Agricultural Science; Vol. 2, No. 1; 2020 ISSN 2690-5396 E-ISSN 2690-4799 https://doi.org/10.30560/as.v2n1p144 144 Published by IDEAS SPREAD Effects of Polypropylene Bag on Storage Properties of Litchi (Litchi Chinensis Sonn.) Fakhar Uddin Talukder1, Md. Sohanur Rahman2 & Md. kamrul Hassan3 1, 2 Scientific Officer, Pest Management Division, Bangladesh Jute Research Institute, Manik Mia Avenue, Dhaka- 1207, Bangladesh 3 Professor, Department of Horticulture, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh -2202, Bangladesh Correspondance: Md. Sohanur Rahman, Scientific Officer, Entomology Department, Bangladesh Jute Research Institute, Manik Mia Avenue, Dhaka-1207, Bangladesh. E-mail: sohanbau2010@gmail.com Received: March 28, 2020 Accepted: April 28, 2020 Online Published: May 3, 2020 Abstract The present study was run in the laboratory of the Department of Horticulture, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh during the period of 15 May to September, 2016. The objectives of the study were to determine the effects of different postharvest treatments on the storage behaviour of litchi. Eight postharvest treatments viz., control, fruits stored in 50µ polypropylene bag at ambient temperature, fruits stored in 75µ polypropylene bag at ambient temperature, fruits stored in 100µ polypropylene bag at ambient temperature, fruits stored at 4ºC temperature, fruits stored in 50µ polypropylene bag at 4ºC temperature, fruits stored in 75µ polypropylene bag at 4ºC temperature, fruits stored in 100µ polypropylene bag at 4ºC temperature were assigned to the litchi fruits. The single factor experiment was laid out in a completely randomized design with three replications. 75µ polypropylene bag at low temperature (4ºC) caused minimal weight loss, whereas, the untreated fruits exhibited maximal weight loss. The pericarp turned brown within 4 days of storage in the untreated fruits, while polypropylene bags helped keep its bright red colour, but microbial decay was evident at the end of the storage period. Different postharvest treatments showed highly significant variation in the shelf life of litchi. Among the treated and untreated fruits, 75µ polypropylene bag at low temperature (4ºC) treatment exhibited better storage performance. The fruits kept in 75µ polypropylene bag at 4°C showed the highest shelf life (20.67 days) followed by 50µ polypropylene bag at 4°C (20.33 days), and it was the lowest in the untreated fruits (3 days). Keywords: litchi, polypropylene bag, temperature, postharvest, shelf life 1. Introduction Litchi (Litchi chinensis Sonn.) is called as one of the kings of sub-tropical fruits and famous for its excellent quality such as juiciness, slightly sour-sweet taste, characteristics pleasant flavor and for attractive colour. It is under the family Sapindaceae and subfamily Nepheleae. A white to cream coloured translucent pulp surrounding a glossy brown seed is its edible portion. The pulp is grape-like in texture, very succulent, aromatic and is characterized by sweet and acid tastes (Cavaletto, 1980). This fruit is originated in china, cultivated for 300 years and was introduced to Burma and India by the end of the 17th century (Goto, 1960; Liang, 1981). It was introduced into Australia, South Africa and Hawaii by the end of the 19th century (Menzel and Simpson, 1986). Other litchi growing countries of the world are Bangladesh, Pakistan, the Philippines, Thailand, Madagascar and Hong Kong. Litchi fruit is so popular and major table fruit in Bangladesh. It is demanded by all classes of people. Litchi cultivating districts are Dinajpur, Rajshahi, Rangpur, Jessore, Pabna, Chittagong, Dhaka, Sylhet and Mymensingh. According to BBS (2006) Bangladesh produces 73000 mt of litchi per annum from 1619.43 hectares of land. Litchi is known as a non-climacteric fruit (Wills et al., 2004) and it spoils its quality very quick after harvesting. The first and important visual sign of fruit quality deterioration is pericarp browning. It is considered the most important postharvest problem of litchi. Browning is normally caused by dehydration of the pericarp. When fruits loss a few percent of the harvested pericarp fresh weight it starts to brown. (Jiang and Fu 1999). The study mainly highlights on pericarp browning reduction of litchi and therefore, the biochemistry of browning needs to be clearly realized. The prominent colours of mature litchi fruits are largely due to a range of anthocyanins located in the mid to upper mesocarp (Underhill and Critchley, 1993). as.ideasspread.org Agricultural Science Vol. 2, No. 1; 2020 145 Published by IDEAS SPREAD Ivi and Banik (2003) conducted an experiment on the effect of sulfur treatment followed by HCl dipping on the retention of litchi pericarp colour and fruit quality- by storing in polyethylene bag and polypropylene packaging. They reported that physiological loss in weight was lower in fruits in polyethylene bag than in polypropylene packaging. Chaiprasart (2005) ran an experiment with litchi fruit packed in tray and wrapped in polyethylene and polyvinyl chloride films and fruits were stored at 5°C. He found that fruits wrapped in polyethylene showed slight changes in weight loss and the peal was brighter than polyvinyl chloride during 12 days of storage. Roy (2002) studied the postharvest behaviors of litchi cv. ‘Bombai’ and ‘Bedana’. He noticed that fruits preserved in unperforated polyethylene bag without litchi leaves at low temperature (7-8 °c) showed minimal weight loss and gave the longest shelf life (21.50days) than the fruits kept in unperforated polyethylene bag with or without litchi leaves, oil coated fruits kept in unperforated polyethylene bag without litchi leaves. Kamleshwar (2001) reported that litchi fruits covered with shisam (Dalbergia sisso)leaves, litchi leaves, polyethylene bag, paper cuttings and perforated polyethylene bags and kept in a basket for storage, the treatments shisam leaves, litchi leaves, polyethylene bags deteriorated and become inedible on the 5th day. The fruits of the treatment last perforated plastic bags were fairly to maintain acceptable quality until the 7th days of storage where the rest of the treatments did not perform well. Fontes et al. (1999) investigated the influence of low density polyethylene, PVC and temperature (27 or 50C) on litchi cv. ‘Brewster’ during storage. Regardless of temperature low density polyethylene (LDP) film (non perforated) had the lowest water loss throughout the storage period and at 27°C LDP were able to reduce the rate of browning until 8th day after harvest. Liang et al. (1948) conducted an experiment to study the effect of 3 types of packaging materials on litchi fruit. They found that at room temperature weight loss was reduced by 10.4% and proportion of good fruits were 96.2% and 71.4% after 3 and 5 days of storage when fruits were packed in Litchi chinensis leaves inside plastic boxes. Mitra et al. (1996) studied the effect of polyethylene at low temperature on litchi cv. ‘Bombai’ during storage. Ripe litchi fruits were harvested and placed in perforated polyethylene bags and stored at 0°C, 4°C and at ambient temperature. The control fruits were dipped in water and stored at ambient temperature. Results showed that wrapping fruits in polyethylene bags gave the longest life with better quality at 4°C than at 0°C (up to 18 and 16 days, respectively). Bluller et al. (1983) stated that it was possible to store fully ripe litchi fruits in perforated polyethylene bags for up to 35 days at 3.3°C. Sing et al. (2004) reported that polythene wrappers having 20% vent+Ca (NO3)2 at 1.0, 1.5 and 2% recorded minimum spoilage percentage (20.50, 20.50 and 20.00) in Purbi and 19.17, 20.50 and 20.33 in ‘manaraji’ cultivars, respectively on the thirteenth day of storage. A maximum economic life of 11 days was also observed using the same treatments in both cultivars. According to Techavuthiporn et al. (2006) fruit shelf life increased from 20 days in 21% O2 (air) to 32 days in 3-8% O2. Rajak et al. (2004) conducted an experiment with litchi cv. ‘Shahi’ fruit by sulphur fumigation and packed in different packaging materials. They observed 21 days (longest) shelf life in sulfur fumigated fruit in polythene bags at 14ºC and 2 days (shortest) in untreated fruits at 31ºC. Ramma (2004) observed that litchi fruit treated with sulfur fume and dipped in 3% HCl extended the storage life to 5 weeks under storage at 2°C and 90-95% RH. compared to 2 weeks for sulfur treated fruits that were not acid treated. Semeerbabu et al. (2007) found that the shelf life of litchi fruits were 21 days which were treated with SO2 fume followed by 4% HCl dip and packed in LDPE film pouches at 2±1°C. Mitra and Kar (2001) obtained the best results under the treatments on fruits using litchi perforated polyethylene at 0 and 4ºC, where minimum physiological loss in weight up to 8 days of storage was observed and storage life was extended up to 14 and 18 days, respectively. According to Lin et al. (2003) the postharvest life of fruit at ambient temperature is less than 3days. Lin (1999) conducted an experiment with litchi fruits cv. ‘Huoli’ and ‘Heiyell’. He noticed that fruit treated with polysaccharide solution in combination with various disinfectants and stored in plastic bag at room temperature give the best results with 84.2-89.2% sound fruits after 12 days for storage, whereas the controls had only 4% sound fruit after 4 days of storage. The need to increase the shelf life and reduce postharvest browning of litchi is of paramount importance. So, the present study has been undertaken to find out suitable postharvest treatment to reduce pericarp browning & extend shelf life of litchi. 2. Materials and Methods The experiments were carried out at the laboratory of the Departments of Horticulture, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh during the period from 15 May to 15 September, 2016. The litchi variety, namely ‘Bombai’ was chosen as experimental materials for the current investigation of the experiment. The experimental litchies were collected from the local growers of Ishwardi, Pabna. The maturity of the fruits was determined by the flatness of tubercles and comparative smoothness of epicarp. The commercially important litchi variety namely as.ideasspread.org Agricultural Science Vol. 2, No. 1; 2020 146 Published by IDEAS SPREAD ‘Bombai’ was used for the present experiment. The single factor experiment consists of Eight (8) treatments as T0= control (Fruits under ordinary conditions without wrapping), T1= Fruits wrapped in 50µ polypropylene bag at ambient temperature, T2= Fruits wrapped in 75µ polypropylene bag at ambient temperature, T3= Fruits wrapped in 100µ polypropylene bag at ambient temperature, T4= Fruits stored at 4°C temperature, T5= Fruits wrapped in 50µ polypropylene bag at 4°C temperature, T6= Fruits wrapped in 75µ polypropylene bag at 4°C temperature and T7= Fruits wrapped in 100µ polypropylene bag at 4°C temperature. The single factor experiment was laid out in completely randomized design with three replications of 8 fruits. A total of 192 fruits of more or less similar shape and size and free of visible disease symptoms were randomly selected from the harvested fruits. Among 8 fruits in each replication of each treatment 4 fruits were marked to investigate colour, pericarp browning, total weight loss, disease incidence, disease severity, isolation and identification of causal pathogens, shelf life and the remaining 4 fruits were kept unmarked conditions for destructive sampling to examine moisture content, dry matter content, TSS, pulp to peel ratio, vitamin C and pulp pH. All the marked and unmarked fruits were then subjected to the following treatments as per the experimental design: Thirty-six fruits were randomly selected from the lot and kept on brown paper placed on the laboratory floor at ambient conditions without imposing any treatment. Polypropylene bag with the thickness of 50µ, 75µ and 100µ (35X24 cm) were used for this treatment. Twelve fruits were kept the Polypropylene bag for each replication. The top of the bag was tied by using thread and then placed on brown paper for observation at ambient condition. Fruits were kept in low temperature (4ºC). Twelve fruits were taken in a petridish and then placed on brown paper for observation at low temperature condition. The fruits into polypropylene bag were kept into refrigerator at temperature of 4°C. Polypropylene bag with the thickness of 50µ,75µ and 100µ (35X24 cm) were used for this treatment. Twelve fruits were kept the Polypropylene bag for each replication. The top of the bag was tied by using thread and then placed on brown paper for observation at low temperature (4°C) condition. The parameters studied include: colour, browning, pulp to peel ratio, total weight loss, moisture content, dry matter content and shelf life. The above parameters were studied as per the following methods. Among 12 fruits in each replication 6 fruits were used for destructive sampling at 2 days interval to investigate several parameters including moisture content, dry matter content, pulp to peel ratio. The remaining 6 fruits were used to investigate colour, browning, total weight loss and shelf life. 2.1 Colour Days required to reach different stages of colour during storage and ripening were determined objectively using numerical rating scale of 1-6, where 1 = ‘green’, 2= ‘breaker’ or 10-<30% coloured, 3 = 30-<50% coloured, 4 = 50-<70% coloured, 5 =70-<90% coloured and 6 = fully coloured. Similar rating scale was used by Hassan, (2006) for mango. 2.2 Pericarp Browning Days required to reach different stages of browning during storage and ripening were determined using numerical rating scale of 1-5, where, 1 = 10-<30% brown, 2 = 30-<50% brown, 3 = 50-<75% brown, 4 =75-<90% brown and 5 = 90-<100% brown. 2.3 Pulp to peel ratio The fruits were peeled at the 3rd, 6th and the 9th day's storage. After separating, the peel and pulp weights were taken separately by using an electric balance and then the pulp to peel ratio was calculated. The pulp was then used for other chemical analyses. 2.4 Total weight loss 6 fruits of each replication of each treatment were weighed by using an electric balance at the first day of storage and at every 2-day intervals. Weight loss of fruit was estimated during storage by using the following formula: Weight loss (%) = IW FW -IW ×100 Where, IW = Initial weight of fruits (g) FW = Final weight of fruits (g) as.ideasspread.org Agricultural Science Vol. 2, No. 1; 2020 147 Published by IDEAS SPREAD 2.5 Moisture Content Ten grams of fruit pulp was taken in a Petridish from each treatment and replication. The Petridish was placed in an electric oven preset at 80°C for 72 hours until constant weight attained. It was then cooled in desiccators and weighed again. Percent moisture content was calculated according to the following formula: Moisture content (%) = IW FW -IW ×100 Where, IW = Initial weight of pulp (g) FW= Final weight of oven dried pulp (g) 2.6 Dry Matter Content Percent dry matter content of the pulp was calculated from the data obtained during moisture estimation using the following formula; Dry matter (%) = (100%-% moisture content) 2.7 Shelf Life Shelf life of litchi fruits as influenced by different varieties was calculated by counting the days required to ripe fully as to retaining optimum marketing and eating qualities. 2.8 Observation Fruits used in the experiment were observed everyday. Data were collected on weight loss, physical and chemical changes and rottening of the fruits during storage as influence by different postharvest treatments. 2.9 Statistical Analysis For the experiment, the collected data were statistically analyzed by Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) test. The means of different parameters were compared by least significant difference (LSD) as described by Gomez and Gomez (1984). For percentage data arcsine transformations were carried out to satisfy the assumption of ANOVA. 3. Results and Discussion 3.1 Colour Figure 1. Effect of different postharvest treatments in colour change of litchi during storage. a = colour scale (1 = ‘green’, 2 = 10-<30% colour, 3 = 30-<50% colour, 4 = 50-<70% colour, S = 70-<90% colour, 6 = 90-100% colour).The vertical bar represents LSD at 5% level of probability. T0= control, T1= 50µ polypropylene bag at ambient temp, T2= 75µ polypropylene bag at ambient temp, T3= 100µ polypropylene bag at ambient temp, T4= Low temperature (4°C) treatment, T5= 50µ polypropylene bag at 4°C temp, T6= 75µ polypropylene bag at 4°C temp, T7= 100µ polypropylene bag at 4°C temp as.ideasspread.org Agricultural Science Vol. 2, No. 1; 2020 148 Published by IDEAS SPREAD The influence of different postharvest treatments in respect of reduction of postharvest browning and extension of shelf life of litchi was studied. The experiment was carried out to achieve the objective of the study. The results obtained from the present investigation are presented and interpreted in the following: Different storage treatments used in the present investigation had pronounced effects on colour changes of litchi fruits. The variations among the treatments were significant in respect of colour change. A sharped changed was observed in colour change among all the treatments. However, the fruits kept in 75µpolypropylene bag at 4ºC temperature (T6) were good until the 10th days of storage, whereas the fruits kept in 50µ polypropylene bag at ambient temperature (T1), 75µ polypropylene bag at ambient temperature (T2), 100µ polypropylene bag at ambient temperature (T3) attained full colour at the 10th day of storage (Fig. 6). It was also observed that control fruits(T0) lost its colour very fastly followed by fruits kept in 4ºC temperature (T4). 3.2 Pericarp Browning Figure 2. Effect of different postharvest treatments on pericarp browning of litchi during storage. Browning scale, b=(1= 10-<30%brown, 2= 30-> /ColorImageDict << /QFactor 0.15 /HSamples [1 1 1 1] /VSamples [1 1 1 1] >> /JPEG2000ColorACSImageDict << /TileWidth 256 /TileHeight 256 /Quality 30 >> /JPEG2000ColorImageDict << /TileWidth 256 /TileHeight 256 /Quality 30 >> /AntiAliasGrayImages false /CropGrayImages true /GrayImageMinResolution 300 /GrayImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleGrayImages true /GrayImageDownsampleType /Bicubic /GrayImageResolution 300 /GrayImageDepth -1 /GrayImageMinDownsampleDepth 2 /GrayImageDownsampleThreshold 1.50000 /EncodeGrayImages true /GrayImageFilter /DCTEncode /AutoFilterGrayImages true /GrayImageAutoFilterStrategy /JPEG /GrayACSImageDict << /QFactor 0.15 /HSamples [1 1 1 1] /VSamples [1 1 1 1] >> /GrayImageDict << /QFactor 0.15 /HSamples [1 1 1 1] /VSamples [1 1 1 1] >> /JPEG2000GrayACSImageDict << /TileWidth 256 /TileHeight 256 /Quality 30 >> /JPEG2000GrayImageDict << /TileWidth 256 /TileHeight 256 /Quality 30 >> /AntiAliasMonoImages false /CropMonoImages true /MonoImageMinResolution 1200 /MonoImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleMonoImages true /MonoImageDownsampleType /Bicubic /MonoImageResolution 1200 /MonoImageDepth -1 /MonoImageDownsampleThreshold 1.50000 /EncodeMonoImages true /MonoImageFilter /CCITTFaxEncode /MonoImageDict << /K -1 >> /AllowPSXObjects false /CheckCompliance [ /None ] /PDFX1aCheck false /PDFX3Check false /PDFXCompliantPDFOnly false /PDFXNoTrimBoxError true /PDFXTrimBoxToMediaBoxOffset [ 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 ] /PDFXSetBleedBoxToMediaBox true /PDFXBleedBoxToTrimBoxOffset [ 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 ] /PDFXOutputIntentProfile () /PDFXOutputConditionIdentifier () /PDFXOutputCondition () /PDFXRegistryName () /PDFXTrapped /False /CreateJDFFile false /Description << /ARA /BGR /CHS /CHT /CZE /DAN /DEU /ESP /ETI /FRA /GRE /HEB /HRV (Za stvaranje Adobe PDF dokumenata najpogodnijih za visokokvalitetni ispis prije tiskanja koristite ove postavke. Stvoreni PDF dokumenti mogu se otvoriti Acrobat i Adobe Reader 5.0 i kasnijim verzijama.) /HUN /ITA /JPN /KOR /LTH /LVI /NLD (Gebruik deze instellingen om Adobe PDF-documenten te maken die zijn geoptimaliseerd voor prepress-afdrukken van hoge kwaliteit. De gemaakte PDF-documenten kunnen worden geopend met Acrobat en Adobe Reader 5.0 en hoger.) /NOR /POL /PTB /RUM /RUS /SKY /SLV /SUO /SVE /TUR /UKR /ENU (Use these settings to create Adobe PDF documents best suited for high-quality prepress printing. Created PDF documents can be opened with Acrobat and Adobe Reader 5.0 and later.) >> /Namespace [ (Adobe) (Common) (1.0) ] /OtherNamespaces [ << /AsReaderSpreads false /CropImagesToFrames true /ErrorControl /WarnAndContinue /FlattenerIgnoreSpreadOverrides false /IncludeGuidesGrids false /IncludeNonPrinting false /IncludeSlug false /Namespace [ (Adobe) (InDesign) (4.0) ] /OmitPlacedBitmaps false /OmitPlacedEPS false /OmitPlacedPDF false /SimulateOverprint /Legacy >> << /AddBleedMarks false /AddColorBars false /AddCropMarks false /AddPageInfo false /AddRegMarks false /ConvertColors /ConvertToCMYK /DestinationProfileName () /DestinationProfileSelector /DocumentCMYK /Downsample16BitImages true /FlattenerPreset << /PresetSelector /MediumResolution >> /FormElements false /GenerateStructure false /IncludeBookmarks false /IncludeHyperlinks false /IncludeInteractive false /IncludeLayers false /IncludeProfiles false /MultimediaHandling /UseObjectSettings /Namespace [ (Adobe) (CreativeSuite) (2.0) ] /PDFXOutputIntentProfileSelector /DocumentCMYK /PreserveEditing true /UntaggedCMYKHandling /LeaveUntagged /UntaggedRGBHandling /UseDocumentProfile /UseDocumentBleed false >> ] >> setdistillerparams << /HWResolution [2400 2400] /PageSize [612.000 792.000] >> setpagedevice