Effect of three biowastes on the productivity potential of a sodic soil Received for publication: 7 January, 2016. Accepted for publication: 30 June, 2016. Doi: 10.15446/agron.colomb.v34n2.55044 1 Department of Physics, Faculty of Natural and Exact Sciences, Universidad del Valle. Cali (Colombia). 2 Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Palmira (Colombia). diospinasa@unal.edu.co Agronomía Colombiana 34(2), 250-259, 2016 Effect of three biowastes on the productivity potential of a sodic soil Efecto de tres biorresiduos en el potencial productivo de un suelo sódico Mauricio Alejandro Gutiérrez C.1, Orlando Zúñiga E.1, and Daniel I. Ospina-Salazar2 ABSTRACT RESUMEN Three biowastes were applied to a Typic Haplustepts sodic soil in order to generate a Soil Productivity Potential (SPP) indicator derived from the biological, physical and chemical properties. The biowastes included swine manure (SM), vinasse (VS) and composted biosolids (CB) incorporated on experimental plots and left undisturbed. The assessment of the soil properties was done prior to and twice during the experiment. The biowastes produced, in general, an increase in the SPP, being higher that of swine manure at the lowest dose in the short term, and composted biosolids at the highest dose in the long term; the vinasse did not significantly increase the SPP at any dose. In the control plots, in contrast, the SPP decreased steadily during the experiment period. The application of the three biowastes reduced the exchangeable sodium percentage, as well as the electric conductivity, particularly with the swine manure and composted biosolids at the low and high doses, respectively. The total porosity did not change significantly, whereas the CO2 production increased between all of the treatments and control. The SPP indicated that the biowaste addition improved the quality status of a sodic soil, particularly at the chemical level; hence, this practice could prevent the loss of productivity in the short and long term. Se aplicaron tres biorresiduos a un suelo sódico Typic Haplus- tepts, con el fin de generar un indicador del Potencial Produc- tivo del Suelo (PPS), derivado de sus propiedades biológicas, físicas y químicas. Se emplearon los biorresiduos porquinaza (P), vinaza (V), y biosólidos compostados (BC), aplicados superficialmente en lotes experimentales sin alterar. Las evalu- aciones de las propiedades del suelo se realizaron antes y dos veces durante el experimento. Los biorresiduos produjeron un incremento en el PPS, siendo mayor el de porquinaza a menor dosis en el corto plazo, y el de biosólidos compostados a mayor dosis en el largo plazo; vinaza no incrementó el PPS significa- tivamente a ninguna dosis. En contraste, en el testigo el PPS disminuyó sostenidamente durante el tiempo del ensayo. La aplicación de los tres biorresiduos redujo el porcentaje de sodio intercambiable, así como la conductividad eléctrica, especial- mente con porquinaza y biosólidos compostados en bajas y altas dosis. La porosidad total no varió significativamente, mientras que la producción de CO2 aumentó en todos los tratamientos y el testigo. El PPS indica que la aplicación de biorresiduos mejora las condiciones del suelo sódico, particularmente a nivel químico, así que esta práctica podría prevenir pérdidas de productividad en el corto y largo plazo. Key words: soil amendments, soil chemicophysical properties, soil improvement. Palabras clave: enmiendas del suelo, propiedades fisicoquímicas del suelo, mejora de suelos. sodicity in crop soils is related to inadequate irrigation practices, a lack of routine monitoring of water quality, as well as the bicarbonate content, which leads to its transfer to the soil (Ramírez-Alzate, 2011). Moreover, there are concerns about the massive genera- tion of by-products derived from industrial and livestock processes, such as vinasse, wastewater biosolids, and pig manure. However, the use of these biowastes as amend- ments in degraded soils, or also as fertilizers, is a promis- ing issue, while palliating their possible impacts on the environment. In Colombia, Ordinance 1287 (July 10th 2014) states the rate of use of biosolids in crop soils in relation to the content of heavy metals and biological risk (MVCT, 2014). Sugar mills have been also evaluating different ways Introduction Sodic soils are widely present in farmlands, where there could be losses in crop productivity without adequate management. In the Cauca Valley region of southwest Co- lombia, it is estimated that there are around 20,000 ha with some degree of risk of salinity or sodicity, and 40,000 ha affected by saturation levels of sodium above 15% (Calero- Aguado et al., 2013). The reduction in soil productivity is due to def locculation processes and unavailability of base cations, such as Mg2+ and Ca2+, which limit the aggregate stability and, therefore, leads to a poor physical condition of the soil. Sodium also affects plant development because of specific toxicity of this element in some species (Bauder et al., 2014). In the Valle del Cauca department, progressive http://dx.doi.org/10.15446/agron.colomb.v34n2.55044 251Gutiérrez C., Zúñiga E., and Ospina-Salazar: Effect of three biowastes on the productivity potential of a sodic soil of applying vinasse on sugar cane crops in order to restore the nutrients depleted by each harvest. Pineda et al. (2015) found an increase in phosphorus and potassium in the soil, as well as in the growth parameters of sugar cane fertilized with a dose of 60 m3 ha-1 of vinasse. The swine industry is also aware of the use of pig manure as a soil amendment for crop production, which is a practical method to solve the disposal problem and can be an agronomically and economically viable management practice for sustain- able crop production in some areas (Choudhary et al., 1996). Yongchao et al. (2005) reported that a mixture of pig manure and rice straw had a significant effect on the enzymatic and microbial activity of the soil, as well as the respiration rate, when it was added to pots simulating a salinized environment with NaCl. The long-term effects of biowastes on soils have proven to be beneficial. Avnimelech et al. (1994), in a two-year evaluation, found that the addition of municipal solid waste compost was even superior to gypsum in reclaiming alka- line soils. Further authors supported this finding, showing that gypsum alone is not able to restore saline-sodic soils, but when combined with municipal solid waste sequen- tially, the physical, chemical and biological properties were restored (Hanay et al., 2004). Diacono and Montemurro (2010) summarized the long- term effects of organic amendments on soil fertility, demonstrating that, among others, the regular addition of composted organic residues increased the soil physi- cal fertility, mainly by improving the aggregate stability and decreasing the soil bulk density. In addition, the crop yield increased with long-term applications of municipal solid waste compost, and there was no tangible evidence demonstrating negative impacts of heavy metals applied to soils, particularly when high-quality compost was used for long periods. Since biological, physical and chemical properties do not ref lect by themselves the productivity and conservation status of a soil, it is necessary to establish quality soil indicators that link together all of the characteristics of a soil. The available methodologies only focus on analytical techniques, reducing the entire concept (soil quality) to the sum of their parts (soil properties). In contrast, an alterna- tive methodology to measure soil status is the Soil Produc- tivity Potential (SPP), a synthetic indicator that includes both analytical and synthetic properties (such as thermal conductivity, porosity and exchangeable sodium percent- age) in order to generate an overall diagnosis of the soil, which conducts to differential management strategies and fertilization with the identification of areas with distinct productivity potential (Zúñiga et al., 2008). This indicator has been evaluated on three livestock hillside farms in the Cauca valley, showing that slight changes in humidity and fertility inf luence the SPP and are related to the microbial activity (Rojas et al., 2009). The aim of this study was, thus, to measure the effect of three biowastes on the SPP indicator in a soil affected by sodicity through the evaluation of their biological, chemical and physical properties in undisturbed conditions of the Cauca Valley region, Colombia. Materials and methods Location and georeferencing The experiments were carried out in the Moraima farm, located in the Cerrito municipality, Valle del Cauca De- partment. The experimental field was set at the coordinates 3°38’44” N and 76°13’18” W, at 973 m a.s.l. At the time of the experiments, the farm was being used for cattle produc- tion. Geographically, the Moraima farm is part of a basin between the Central and Western Ranges of the Andes, in the f loodplain of the Cauca river. The average temperature is 24ºC, with a maximum of 30ºC and a minimum of 18ºC, while precipitation reaches 1,200 mm year-1. Soil survey and taxonomy The parental material of the soils are gross f lood particles, deep and drained, high fertility and gross texture. The soils of the farm are part of the Marsella consociation. This con- sociation is classified as a Typic Haplustepts, gross-loam, mixed, superactive, isohypertermic, represented by the mo- dal profile CC806 (IGAC, 2004). The slope is less than 1%, representative of f lat topography. Three samplings of the plots were done, one before the start of the experiments, a second one a month after the application of the treatments, and a last one seventeen months later. For the chemical and biological properties, altered samples were taken with a shovel in the first 20 cm of the soil profile, and, for the physical properties, a bore soil sampler with a cylindrical core inside was used. At each plot, three samples were taken. Physical and chemical analysis of the soil and biowastes The samples were analyzed at the Agrilab Laboratories in Bogota for the chemical properties and in the laboratory of Environmental Physics of Universidad del Valle in Cali for the biological and physical properties. Table 1 sums up the analytical methodology. 252 Agron. Colomb. 34(2) 2016 Vinasse was obtained from the Providencia sugar mill located in the Cerrito municipality. The swine manure was produced and composted on the Moraima farm, and the composted biosolids from the Cañaveralejo wastewater plant in Cali. Field tillage and experiment design The tillage of the experiment field was done by passing twice with a cross chisel in order to build up ridges and set adequate conditions to incorporate the three different biowastes. After this, ten 12 x 40 m plots were defined for the application of the biowaste treatments, each plot containing fifteen ridges. Each biowaste (composted biosolid, swine manure and vinasse) had three levels of dose application, for ten treat- ments, including the control, distributed in a completely randomized design with three replicates. The doses were calculated according to the availability of each biowaste in the source and dividing them by three (Tab. 2). The time between each application of the biowastes was approxi- mately 2 months, the first one in early March, 2012 and the second one mid-May, 2012. The treatments were applied to the plots by using a knap- sack in the case of the vinasse, whereas for the biosolids and swine manure, it was done by hand for the surface dis- tribution, homogeneously. The plots were left undisturbed until the end of the experiments. Soil Productivity Potential (SPP) modeling SPP is a synthetic variable that links together the soil analytical and synthetic properties. Analytical properties are those that directly give a characterization of the soil, such as exchangeable sodium percentage and macropo- rosity, whereas synthetic properties are those that give an idea of the status of the soil, specifically through the energy f low, as heat or electricity, and are indirectly determined by the thermal conductivity and resistivity. The model for the determination of this parameter was set up with fuzzy logic. The interface used to process the data was Fis-Pro 3.4. Figure 1 shows a scheme of the fuzzy logic processing. The input variables were total pore space, thermal conductivity and ESP, whereas the output was SPP. FIGURE 1. Interface used for fuzzy logic in Fis-Pro 3.4. With this basis, labels were assigned to identify the subordination degree of each variable and the ranges at which they are consider low, medium or high. Through the application of fuzzy rules IF and AND to the prior ranges, the SPP estimation was inferred. The biological and physical properties, as well as the SPP data were statistically analyzed with a Tukey test and SPSS software (Statistical Procedures Companion, Upper Saddle River, NJ). Results and discussion Physical and chemical characterization of the soil and biowastes The physical characteristics of the Marsella consociation showed moderately fine textures in the arable layer. The bulk density was high (1.50 to 1.56 g cm-3), whereas the particle density ranged from medium to high (2.57 to 2.88 TABLE 1. Methodologies used in the analysis of sodic soil treated with biowastes. Parameter Method Texture Bouyucos Bulk density Richards Thermal conductivity Electrothermal pH Potenciometer Organic carbon Walkley and Black Electric conductivity Saturation extract K, Ca, Mg, Na Ammonium acetate. Atomic absorption P Olsen/colorimetric Microelements Melhich I Microbial activity Titration TABLE 2. Applied biowaste doses and treatments in a sodic soil. Biowaste Treatment Application 1 Application 2 Total Vinasse (L ha-1) VS1 1,000 1,000 2,000 VS2 5,000 5,000 10,000 VS3 10,000 10,000 20,000 Total VS 32,000 Composted biosolid (kg ha-1) CB1 1,000 2,000 3,000 CB2 5,000 20,000 25,000 CB3 10,000 50,000 60,000 Total CB 88,000 Swine manure (kg ha-1) SM1 1,000 2,600 3,600 SM2 5,000 6,500 11,500 SM3 10,000 10,000 20,000 Total SM 35,100 Control C 0 0 0 Input Output Diffusor Inference mechanism De-diffusor 253Gutiérrez C., Zúñiga E., and Ospina-Salazar: Effect of three biowastes on the productivity potential of a sodic soil g cm-3); regarding total porosity in the topsoil, a dominance of micropores versus macropores was noticed (44.3% and 12.7%, respectively). The soils of the experiment field are typically sodic, clayey, showing an average exchangeable sodium percentage (ESP) of 72.88% and an electric conductivity (EC) of 3.7 dS m-1, whereas the soil reaction was slightly to moderately alkaline (pH 7.7 to 9.3). The concentration of Ca2+ and Mg2+ ranged from 1 to 8 cmolc kg-1 and 0.7 to 7.6 cmolc kg-1, respectively; these values are within the ranges reported for this type of soils (Verma et al., 2013; Ahmad et al., 2016). Limita- tions for plant growth and soil exploitation are related to the calcium/magnesium ratio, high sodium saturation ratio (>70%), low content of microelements and mildly to moderately alkaline soil reactions (Tab. 3). Physical, biological and chemical properties as affected by the biowastes The biological properties of the soil, measured as the micro- bial activity, were not significantly affected by any biowaste, in comparison with the control plot. Although the degree of this activity tended to increase up to the seventeenth month, this could be attributed not only to the treatments but also to the growth of vegetal layer on the undisturbed plots. This explain the higher microbial activity in the control plots. Notably, CB decreased it at all three doses, unlike VS and SM, where this parameter went progressively increased with each dose. However, at the end of the ex- periment, the microbial activity reached a non-significant steady value throughout all of the treatments and control (Fig. 2). Barbarick et al. (2004), pointed out that the control and biosolids treatments in shrublands had statistically the same qCO2 at 6 years after application, indicating that biosolids did not produce increased adverse stress on the microbial population. The increase in the CO2 production over time observed in this study could be attributed to a lesser microbial C biomass or to a microbial stress indu- ced by the amount of added biowastes. This differed from that indicated by Montenegro-Gómez et al. (2009), whose findings showed a decrease over time in CO2 production in a mollisol treated with vinasse. TABLE 3. Physical, chemical and biological characterization of biowastes applied to a sodic soil. Parameters Units Sodic soil Vinasse Composted biosolids Swine manure Bulk density g cm-3 1.53 - 0.61 0.56 Total porosity % 57 - - - Microporosity % 44.3 - - - Macroporosity % 12.7 - - - Humidity % 17.2 - 56.3 10.4 Clay % 50 - - - Silt % 26.4 - - - Sand % 23.6 - - - Texture - Ar - - - MA kg CO2/ha per day 21.8 - - - OOC % - 10.5 9.8 30.4 pH - 8.71 4.50 8.81 7.08 EC dS m-1 3.7 20.0 23.3 30.6 Ca cmolc kg –1 1.3 48.2 30.3 85.5 Mg cmolc kg –1 1.7 23.2 4.1 65 Na cmolc kg –1 37.8 69.5 1.8 20.4 SAR % 31.1 - - - ESP % 72.8 - - - Mn mg kg-1 0.2 32.4 - 425 B mg kg-1 0.4 13.4 - 52 Zn mg kg-1 0.0 20.0 1686 2700 Cu mg kg-1 0.1 38.3 185 58 Fe mg kg-1 0.3 - 57331 2400 MA, microbial activity; OOC, oxidizable organic carbon; EC, electric conductivity; SAR, sodium adsorption ratio; ESP, exchangeable sodium percentage. 254 Agron. Colomb. 34(2) 2016 The total pore space exhibited an increase over time in all of the treatments, except SM2. In the control plots, this property underwent a slight decrease, which is a signal of a compaction process in the soil, in contrast with that observed in the treated plots (Fig. 3). In this study, it was found that the total porosity was af- fected by the treatments at the beginning and the end of the experiment, but not significantly, by augmenting the air fraction of the soil. Other researchers have also ob- served that the bulk density and porosity suffered changes with biowaste amendments. Ramírez-Pisco et al. (2007) found a reduction in the bulk density of a degraded soil from a brick mine when treated with biosolids at high doses (4 and 8% w/w). This result is in agreement with Linlin et al. (2014), whose findings showed a steady and significant decrease in bulk density and an increasing total porosity in a two-year field experiment with four combinations of compost and furfural. Mondal et al. (2015) also reported a lessening in bulk density with sewage sludge applications in a Typic Haplustept sandy loam soil. However, the results of this study are more re- lated with those of Peñarete et al. (2013), who registered a slight, but not significant reduction in bulk density, and an increase in macroporosity in a vertic endoaquept soil amended with three types of biosolids. A possible explanation given by the authors was that the high content of clay in the soil, plus the water regime of the period of evaluation, induced a compaction process despite the addition of biowastes. FIGURE 2. Microbial activity of a sodic soil with applications of biowastes. Means with different letters indicate significant differences according to the Tukey test (P≤0.05)±SD. See abbreviatons in Tab. 2. VS1 VS2 VS3 CB1 CB2 CB3 SM1 SM2 SM3 C Month 0 26.39 30.69 22.70 31.16 29.75 29.86 29.44 24.87 27.36 28.16 Month 1 21.77 26.41 40.72 12.65 17.74 18.98 15.56 23.73 56.49 32.44 Month 17 64.0 77.7 68.8 62.9 53.3 57.0 51.7 70.5 58.2 65.8 abc c a c bc bc bc ab abc abc a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 M ic ro bi al a ct iv ity ( kg C -C O 2 ha -1 d -1 ) Month 0 Month 1 Month 17 To ta l p or e sp ac e (% ) 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 VS1 VS2 VS3 CB1 CB2 CB3 SM1 SM2 SM3 C 54.6 53.6 54.6 54.1 54.4 54.3 53.7 53.8 54.0 54.1 60.5 58 53.7 52.8 59.5 56.6 57.6 59.8 57.2 68.7 65.6 59.3 57.3 58.8 67.9 59.3 58.7 56.0 57.7 65.4 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a FIGURE 3. Total pore space of a sodic soil with applications of biowastes. Means with different letters indicate significant differences according to the Tukey test (P≤0.05)±SD. See abbreviatons in Tab. 2. 255Gutiérrez C., Zúñiga E., and Ospina-Salazar: Effect of three biowastes on the productivity potential of a sodic soil Porosity is the most important macroscale parameter for the thermal conductivity of dry soils: the thermal con- ductivity of a dry soil linearly increases as the porosity decreases (Yun and Santamarina, 2008). As seen in Fig. 4, the thermal conductivity at the first month of evaluation with VS1, VS3 and SM1 significantly differed from con- trol. This means that in these plots, the soil underwent an increase in air volume. Concerning the chemical properties, it was observed that the addition of biowastes affected several parameters, which could change the characterization of the soil as sodic. The ESP in the control plots remained stable at the two samplings dates, at values of 87.8-92.4%. VS1 and CB2 did not change significantly the ESP, but at their highest FIGURE 4. Thermal conductivity of a sodic soil with applications of biowastes. Means with different letters indicate significant differences according to the Tukey test (P≤0.05)±SD. See abbreviatons in Tab. 2. Month 0 Month 1 Month 17 Th er m al c on du ct iv ity ( ca l c m -1 s -1 °C -1 )· 10 3 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0 9.5 10.0 10.5 11.0 VS1 VS2 VS3 CB1 CB2 CB3 SM1 SM2 SM3 C 9.20 9.12 8.88 8.97 8.91 8.91 9.05 9.17 8.95 9.20 7.22 7.86 7.47 8.26 8.50 8.19 7.24 8.25 8.56 9.07 8.1 9.6 8.0 8.3 9.5 8.2 8.0 10.2 9.5 9.4 a a a a a a a a a a a ab a ab ab ab a ab ab b a a a a a a a a a a Month 0 Month 1 Month 17 ES P ( % ) 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 VS1 VS2 VS3 CB1 CB2 CB3 SM1 SM2 SM3 C 65.79 70.98 81.70 80.49 82.58 82.48 74.93 67.17 78.47 66.41 89.9 62.5 33.7 30.1 82.2 23.0 11.2 47.6 29.7 92.4 88.4 67.1 37.6 44.9 85.7 12.8 19.4 64.0 28.8 87.8 doses this property went consistently lower. This effect was also observed when using SM1 (Fig. 5). The chemical properties of the soil, such as ESP, EC and SAR were significantly affected by the three added bio- wastes. High doses of VS and CB, and low doses of SM, demonstrated a reduction in the ESP more than 50%, reach- ing values near 15% in the case of CB3 and SM1. In the case of VS, the trend was negatively correlated with the dose, whereas with CB and SM, the medium dose presented a gap with the other doses. This could be related to the sampling variations. García-Orenes et al. (2005) previously reported a decreased ESP, from 33.7% to 21.8% in a salinized Xeric Torrif luvent amended with three levels of sewage sludge. The results of Linlin et al. (2014) indicated that organic FIGURE 5. Exchangeable sodium percentage (ESP) of a sodic soil with applications of biowastes. Error bars indicate standard deviation. See abbre- viatons in Tab. 2. 256 Agron. Colomb. 34(2) 2016 amendments could help reduce the ESP and thus, improve saline soils. Our results showed that the CB and SM were more effective in controlling the Na content in a sodic soil. The EC of the soil showed no significant changes in the control plots, but it went progressively lower in the plots with decreasing doses of SM. The inverse effect was ob- served with VS, particularly at the seventeenth month of the evaluation. The CB exhibited an irregular trend, but it decreased the EC below the control in two of the applied doses. Fig. 6. The EC with VS exhibited a growing pattern at the sev- enteenth month of the evaluation; one explanation is that its inherent content of sulfates, sodium and phosphates contributed to the increase in the EC in the plots treated with this biowaste. Gemtos et al. (1999) did not found a significant variation in this parameter by adding two levels of vinasse to a clayey and a silty clay loam soil from Greece. However, Alfaro and Ocampo-Cinchilla (2008), who worked with two levels of vinasse in a vertisol, noticed an important increase in the EC, from 0.29 to 16.49 mS.cm-1. The low EC values achieved with CB3 and SM1 ref lected in their effect on the ESP and SAR, indicating that these two biowastes have an important capacity to alleviate the effects of sodicity in soils. The latter improves the soil structure by increasing the aggregate stability and decreasing the bulk density (Mondal et al., 2015). For the salinized soil, this improvement was primarily due to a reduction in the ESP (García-Orenes et al., 2005). The latter results indicate that the applications of CB and SM were more effective at amending the sodic and saline properties of soils rather than VS, which actually could en- hance these characteristics by increasing the EC. Concomi- tantly with the ESP and EC, the SAR was also affected in the plots treated with the biowastes (Fig. 7). The reduction in the Na+ content had a direct effect on the SAR, which in turn went down to less than 2% (CB3 and SM1). This means that the effects of the biowastes on the physical properties of saline soils could be indirect, through the modification of chemical attributes, such as sodium content or SAR. This parameter was significantly decreased in the treated plots, particularly with SM. The VS showed a trend similar to that of the ESP, which is consistent with the decrease of sodium in the soil. Low SAR levels indicate better physical conditions in clayey soils (Rengasamy, 2010). On the other hand, the higher Ca2+ levels caused by the biowaste application, particularly with VS3, also affected the SAR. SM3 also raised the content of this cation in the soil, as compared to the control, but the losses in time were not as marked as with VS3 (Fig. 8). Previous studies have reported that Ca2+ could improve the soil structure by forming cationic bridges between clay particles and soil organic matter. In addition, Ca2+ can inhibit clay dispersion and the associated disruption of ag- gregates by replacing Na+ and Mg2+ in clay and aggregates, thereby promoting aggregate stability (Linlin et al., 2014). Other researchers have stated that municipal solid wastes increased Ca2+ and Mg2+ in soils in a three-year experiment. The positive changes in soil fertility were connected mainly with an increase in available nutrients, such as Mg, as well as an improvement of soil sorption properties (Weber et al., 2007). Month 0 Month 1 Month 17 El ec tr ic c on du ct iv ity ( dS m -1 ) 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 VS1 VS2 VS3 CB1 CB2 CB3 SM1 SM2 SM3 C 2.77 2.37 1.94 2.31 2.07 2.20 2.37 2.38 2.38 2.53 3.8 3.5 17.1 1.5 2.9 1.7 1.2 2.3 4.0 5.5 2.23 3.05 4.11 0.94 4.57 1.97 0.98 2.01 4.01 5.09 FIGURE 6. Electric conductivity of soil of a sodic soil with applications of biowastes. Error bars indicate standard deviation. See abbreviatons in Tab. 2. 257Gutiérrez C., Zúñiga E., and Ospina-Salazar: Effect of three biowastes on the productivity potential of a sodic soil SPP as affected by biowaste applications The evaluation of the SPP throughout the whole experi- ment showed that, in the control plots, the trend was to progressively decline over time, unlike with the biowastes, where, in all cases, this parameter increased, but only sig- nificantly with CB3 and SM1 at the seventeenth and first month, respectively (Fig. 9). This suggests that CB3 has a long-term effect on the soil productivity, rather than SM1, in which the SPP experienced a decline from the first to seventeenth month. The changes produced by the biowastes, mainly in the chemical properties of the soil, concomitantly inf luenced the SPP parameter. It was expected that CB3 and SM1 would exhibit the highest values of SPP, principally because of the decrease in sodicity and salinity characteristics (SAR, ESP, EC). According to Zúñiga et al. (2007), values below 90 are considered low, values between 90 and 102 are medium, and values above 102 are high. The diminishing trend in the SPP observed in the control plots is an indication of the loss of productivity in sodic soils without adequate management. This is in agreement with Rojas et al. (2009), who concluded that SPP is lower in soils with compaction processes. Cuero (2012) also reported that SPP is lower in soils with inadequate control practices for erosion. Al- though the physical properties, such as total porosity and thermal conductivity, were not affected significantly by the biowaste treatments, the reduction in ESP and SAR, and the increase in the divalent cations, improved the SPP parameter. FIGURE 8. Calcium content in soil of a sodic soil with applications of biowastes. Error bars indicate standard deviation. See abbreviatons in Tab. 2. Month 0 Month 1 Month 17 S A R ( % ) 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 VS1 VS2 VS3 CB1 CB2 CB3 SM1 SM2 SM3 C 28.9 9.0 12.7 11.2 13.3 12.6 8.6 12.9 9.6 19.6 28 8.86 7.78 2.04 15.8 1.57 0.61 4.66 3.35 39.9 20 9.5 4.39 2.76 24.8 0.88 0.99 7.17 3.18 27.8 FIGURE 7. Sodium absorption ratio of a sodic soil with applications of biowastes. Error bars indicate standard deviation. See abbreviatons in Tab. 2. Month 0 Month 1 Month 17 C a (c m ol c k g- 1 ) 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 VS1 VS2 VS3 CB1 CB2 CB3 SM1 SM2 SM3 C 0.74 0.85 0.53 0.73 0.60 0.66 0.84 0.84 0.80 0.81 1.7 5.9 20 5.1 2.45 6.4 6.9 5.2 10.9 1.8 1.2 6.6 11.8 2.55 2.85 9.4 4.35 2.75 10 3 258 Agron. Colomb. 34(2) 2016 Conclusions The surface application of vinasse, composted biosolids and swine manure to a Typic Haplustepts sodic soil mainly af- fected the chemical properties, but marginally affected the physical and biological ones; however, the soil productivity potential indicator ref lected these changes. The above was corroborated by the fact that the SPP improved in the short and long term with the addition of SM and CB, respectively, whereas it decreased over time in the untreated plots, which means a deterioration of the quality status of the soil. In conclusion, the CB and SM were better amendments of sodic soils than VS, and the SPP synthetic indicator sup- ported this. The findings of this study will help to avoid losses in crop productivity from poor condition in sodic soils in Cauca Valley through the proper application and management of the different biowastes generated by the industrial and livestock processes in this region and the application and interpretation of the SPP indicator. Acknowledgments The authors render thanks to the Sustainable Production Group of Corporación Autónoma Regional del Valle del Cauca (CVC) and ILAMA Research Group of Valle Uni- versity for their financial support of this study. Literature cited Ahmad, S., A. Ghafoor, M.E. Akhtar, and M.Z. Khan. 2016. Implica- tion of gypsum rates to optimize hydraulic conductivity for variable-texture saline -sodic soils reclamation. Land Degrad. Dev. 27, 550-560. Doi: 10.1002/ldr.2413 Alfaro, R. and R. Ocampo-Chinchilla. 2008. Cambios físico- químicos provocados por la vinaza en un suelo vertisol en Costa Rica. Agron Costarric. 12, 147-153. Avnimelech, Y., D. Shkedy, M. Kochva, and Y. Yotal. 1994. The use of compost for the reclamation of saline and alkaline soils. Com- post Sci. Util. 2, 6-11. Doi: 10.1080/1065657X.1994.10757926 Barbarick, K.A., K.G. Doxtader, E.F. Redente, and R.B. Brobst. 2004. Biosolids effects on microbial activity in shrubland and grassland soils. Soil Sci. 169, 176-187. Doi: 10.1097/01. ss.0000122525.03492.fe Bauder, T.A., J.G. Davis, and R.M. Waskom. 2014. Managing saline soils. Fact Sheet No. 0.503, Crop Series Soil. In: Colo- rado State University Extension, www.ext.colostate.edu/pubs/ crops/00503.pdf; consulted: may, 2016. Calero-Aguado, A., G. A. Romero-Lozada, and C. Martínez-Herrera. 2013. La salinidad de los suelos en el valle del río Cauca. Tec- nicaña 31, 27-35. Choudhary, M., L.D. Bailey, and C.A. Grant. 1996. Review of the use of swine manure in crop production: effects on yield and composition and on soil and water quality. Waste Manage. Res. 14, 581-595. Doi: 10.1006/wmre.1996.0056 Cuero, R. 2012. Hacia un sistema complementario de producción más limpia en suelos degradados por salinidad. Amb. Sost. 2, 59-68. Diacono, M. and F. Montemurro. 2010. Long-term effects of organic amendments on soil fertility. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 30, 401-422. Doi: 10.1051/agro/2009040 García-Orenes, F., C. Guerrero, J. Mataix-Solera, J. Navarro-Pedre- ño, I. Gómez, and J. Mataix-Beneyto. 2005. Factors control- ling the aggregate stability and bulk density in two different degraded soils amended with biosolids. Soil Till. Res. 82, 65-76. Doi: 10.1016/j.still.2004.06.004 Gemtos, T.A., N. Chouliaras, and S.T. Marakis. 1999. Vinasse rate, time of application and compaction effect on soil properties FIGURE 9. Changes in SPP for each treatment during the time for a sodic soil with applications of biowastes. Means with different letters indicate significant differences according to the Tukey test (P≤0.05)±SD. See abbreviatons in Tab. 2. Month 0 Month 1 Month 17 R el at iv e S P P v al ue s 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 VS1 VS2 VS3 CB1 CB2 CB3 SM1 SM2 SM3 C 45.94 45.71 45.67 45.43 45.48 45.82 46.11 46.40 46.50 47.16 47.38 46.08 49.04 49.57 48.05 47.16 120.71 46.68 48.90 46.44 46.60 46.16 48.39 47.41 46.79 121.92 49.76 47.04 48.92 45.30 abc cd a d d bc ab b abc abc c d abc a cd d bcd bc abc db b b b cd b a b b b b https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2413 https://doi.org/10.1080/1065657X.1994.10757926 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ss.0000122525.03492.fe https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ss.0000122525.03492.fe http://www.ext.colostate.edu/pubs/crops/00503.pdf http://www.ext.colostate.edu/pubs/crops/00503.pdf http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0734242X96900567 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0734242X96900567 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0734242X96900567 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/0734242X http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/0734242X http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/0734242X/14/6 https://doi.org/10.1006/wmre.1996.0056 https://doi.org/10.1051/agro/2009040 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2004.06.004 259Gutiérrez C., Zúñiga E., and Ospina-Salazar: Effect of three biowastes on the productivity potential of a sodic soil and durum wheat crop. J. Agr. Eng. Res. 73, 283-296. Doi: 10.1006/jaer.1999.0419 Hanay, A., F. Büyüksönmez, F.M. Kiziloglu, and M.Y. Canbo- lat. 2004. Reclamation of saline-sodic soils with gypsum and MSW compost. Compost Sci. Util. 12, 175-179. Doi: 10.1080/1065657X.2004.10702177 IGAC, Instituto Geográfico Agustín Codazzi. 2004. Levantamiento de suelos y zonificación de tierras del departamento de Valle del Cauca. Tomo I. Corporación Autónoma Regional del Valle del Cauca (CVC), Bogota. Linlin, W., S. Xiangyang, L. Suyan, Z. Tao, Z. Wei, and Z. Penghui. 2014. Application of organic amendments to a coastal saline soil in north China: effects on soil physical and chemical properties and tree growth. PLoS ONE 9, 1-9. Doi: 10.1371/ journal.pone.0089185 MVCT, Ministerio de Vivienda, Ciudad y Territorio. 2014. Decreto 1287, “Por el cual se establecen criterios para el uso de los biosólidos generados en plantas de tratamiento de aguas re- siduales municipales”. Bogota. Mondal, S., R.D. Singh, A.K. Patra, and B.S. Dwivedi. 2015. Changes in soil quality in response to short-term application of munici- pal sewage sludge in a typic haplustept under cowpea-wheat cropping system. Environ. Nanotechnol. Monit. Manage. 4, 37-41. Doi: 10.1016/j.enmm.2014.12.001 Montenegro-Gómez, S.P., J.C. Menjivar-Flórez, C.R. Bonilla-Correa, and R. Madriñán-Molina. 2009. Inf luencia de la aplicación de vinaza en actividad y biomasa microbiana en un Entic Dystro- pept y un Fluventic Haplustoll del Valle del Cauca, Colombia. Acta Agron. 58, 41-45. Peñarete, W., J. Silva-Leal, N. Urrutia, M. Daza, and P. Torres- Lozada. 2013 Efecto de aplicación de biosólidos sobre las propiedades físicas de un suelo cultivado con caña de azúcar. Acta Agron. 62, 251-260. Pineda R., E., Y. Chico L., M.L. Vidal D., E. Becerra de Armas, F. Acosta H., I. Fernández D., and I. Lugo R. 2015. Uso alternativo de la vinaza en la fertilización de la caña de azúcar, efectos sobre el cultivo y el suelo. Cent. Agric. 42, 31-36. Ramírez-Alzate, J.A. 2011. Evaluación general de la salinidad y modelación de los riesgos de salinización en suelos del Valle del Cauca. MSc thesis. Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Uni- versidad Nacional de Colombia, Palmira, Colombia. Ramírez-Pisco, R., D.C. Velásquez-Pomar, and E. Acosta-Baena. 2007. Efecto de la aplicación de biosolidos en el crecimiento de Jacaranda mimosifolia (Gualanday) y en las condiciones físicas y químicas de un suelo degradado. Rev. Fac. Nal. Agr. Medellin 60, 3751-3770. Rengasamy, P. 2010. Soil processes affecting crop production in salt-affected soils. Funct. Plant Biol. 37, 613-620. Doi: 10.1071/ FP09249 Rojas P., A., E. Madero-Morales, L. M. Ramírez-Náder, and O. Zúñiga-Escobar. 2009. Índice de potencial productivo del suelo aplicado a tres fincas ganaderas de ladera en el Valle del Cauca, Colombia. Acta Agron. 58, 85-90. Verma, T.P., S.P. Singh, G. Ram, S. Rameshwar, R.P. Dhankar, and T. Lal. 2013. Inf luence of landscape on soil properties in up- per Gangetic Plain of Uttar Pradesh. Agropedology 23, 65-76. Weber, J., A. Karczewska, J. Drozd, M. Licznar, S. Licznar, E. Jamroz, and A. Kocowicz. 2007. Agricultural and ecological aspects of a sandy soil as affected by the application of municipal solid waste composts. Soil Biol. Biochem. 39, 1294-1302. Doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2006.12.005 Yongchao, L., S. Jin, M. Nikolic, P. Yu, C. Wei, and J. Yun. 2005. Or- ganic manure stimulates biological activity and barley growth in soil subject to secondary salinization. Soil Biol. Biochem. 37, 1185-1195. Doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.11.017 Yun, T.S. and J.C. Santamarina. 2008. Fundamental study of ther- mal conduction in dry soils. Granul. Matter 10, 197–207. Doi. 10.1007/s10035-007-0051-5 Zúñiga, O., R. Cuero, E. Erazo-Mesa, R. Torres y G. Dávila. 2008. Determinación del potencial productivo del suelo en un cultivo de yuca a partir de la medición de la conductividad térmica y resistividad eléctrica del suelo en el norte del Cauca. Suelos Ecuat. 38, 9-15. Zúñiga, O., R. Cuero, A. Roa, J.C. Osorio, J. Zapata-Usurriaga, and J. Caicedo. 2007. Metodología para determinar el potencial productivo del suelo a partir de la medición de la conductividad térmica y su relación con los análisis químicos en un cultivo de caña de azúcar en el Valle del Cauca. Suelos Ecuat. 37, 10-14. https://doi.org/10.1006/jaer.1999.0419 https://doi.org/10.1080/1065657X.2004.10702177 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089185 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089185 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enmm.2014.12.001 https://doi.org/10.1071/FP09249 https://doi.org/10.1071/FP09249 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2006.12.005 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.11.017 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10035-007-0051-5