Sulfur effects on sugar content, enzyme activity and seed yield of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) Received for publication: 21 April, 2018. Accepted for publication: 2 September, 2019 Doi: 10.15446/agron.colomb.v37n3.71830 1 Agronomic and Horticultural Crops Research Department, Mazandaran Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO Sari (Islamic Republic of Iran). 2 Scientific member and former MSc. graduate student, Islamic Azad University, Gorgan Branch. * Corresponding author: vrameeh@gmail.com Agronomía Colombiana 37(3), 311-316, 2019 ABSTRACT RESUMEN A field experiment was conducted in a randomized complete block design with four sulfur levels, S0, S1, S2 and S3, includ- ing 0, 12, 24 and 36 kg ha-1 (respectively) along with 115 kg N ha-1, to evaluate the economic yield of the rapeseed variety (Hyola401) in Abandankash in the Central District of Sari County in Northern Iran. Parameters such as activity of leaf nitrate reductase, root nitrate content, contents of sugars in leaves and root, root peroxidase activity, and leaf catalase activity as well as seed yield were recorded. The results of the analysis of variance revealed that there were highly significant differences between characters for the majority of the traits such as contents of sugars and nitrate in leaves and root, root peroxidase activity, leaf catalase activity, and seed yield. Due to significant positive correlation between activity of root nitrate reductase and seed yield, increasing this enzyme in roots by sulfur application would have an accelerating effect on rapeseed seed yield. A highly significant positive correlation determined between leaf sugar content and seed yield (0.75**) indicated that increasing levels of sulfur had a direct effect on leaf sugar content, which had an accelerating effect on the weight of seed yield. Sulfur application significantly increased seed yield compared to the control (S0 level), and it ranged from 2744 to 3215 kg ha-1 in S0 and S3. Se realizó un experimento de campo en un diseño de bloques completos al azar con cuatro niveles de azufre, S0, S1, S2 y S3, incluyendo 0, 12, 24 y 36 kg ha-1 (respectivamente) junto con 115 kg N ha-1, para evaluar el rendimiento económico de una variedad de canola (Hyola401) en Abandankash en el Distrito Central del condado de Sari en el norte de Irán. Se registraron parámetros tales como actividad de la nitrato-reductasa de la hoja, contenido de nitrato en raíz, contenido de azúcares en hojas y en raíz, actividades de peroxidasa en raíz y de catalasa en hojas y rendimiento de semilla. Los resultados del análisis de varianza revelaron diferencias altamente significativas entre los caracteres para la mayoría de los rasgos como contenido de nitrato y de azúcares en hojas y raíz, actividades de peroxidasa en raíz y de catalasa en hojas y rendimiento de semillas. Debido a una correlación positiva significativa entre la nitrato- reduc- tasa de la raíz y el rendimiento de la semilla, el aumento de esta enzima en la raíz mediante la aplicación de azufre tiene un efecto acelerador en el rendimiento de la semilla de colza. Una correlación positiva altamente significativa determinada entre el contenido de azúcar en la hoja y el rendimiento de la semilla (0.75**) indica que los niveles crecientes de azufre tuvieron un efecto directo sobre el contenido de azúcar en la hoja, lo que tuvo un efecto acelerador sobre el peso del rendimiento del grano. La aplicación de azufre aumentó significativamente el rendimiento de la semilla sobre el control (nivel de S0) y varió de 2744 a 3215 kg ha-1 en S0 y S3, respectivamente. Key words: correlation, fertilizer, nitrate reductase, nutrient, variation. Palabras clave: correlación, fertilizante, nitrato reductasa, nutriente, variación. Sulfur effects on sugar content, enzyme activity and seed yield of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) Efectos del azufre sobre el contenido de azúcar, la actividad enzimática y el rendimiento de semillas de canola (Brassica napus L.) Valiollah Rameeh1*, Maryam Niakan2, and Mohammad Hossein Mohammadi2 SCiENTifiC NoTE introduction Sulfur (S) is considered the fourth major plant nutrient along with nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium.  Sulfur is important for rapeseed production, and S deficiencies frequently constrain rapeseed yield (Jan et al., 2008). Rapeseed requires about 1.5 kg of S to produce 100 kg ha-1 of seed (Kumar et al., 2002). Therefore, a 3000 kg ha-1 crop would require approximately 45 kg S ha-1. To obtain optimum yields of high-quality rapeseed seed, S needs to be an important part of balanced fertilization along with other nutrients (Jackson, 2000; Malhi and Gill, 2002; Kandil and Gad, 2012; Sharifi, 2012). Sulfur is essential for the synthesis of amino acids including cystine and methionine (a component of vitamin A), and it activates special enzyme systems in plants (Balint and Rengel, 2009). http://dx.doi.org/10.15446/agron.colomb.v37n2.70796 mailto:vrameeh@gmail.com 312 Agron. Colomb. 37(3) 2019 Regarding protein formation during rapeseed growth and development, S can also increase seed yield and improve oil content (Zhao et al., 1993; Jan et al., 2002; Sattar et al., 2011). Sulfur is also involved in the synthesis of chlorophyll and is also required in plants of the family Cruciferae for the synthesis of volatile oils (Marschner, 2012). Castellano and Dick (1991) find that photosynthesis-related proteins such as the Rubisco protein and chlorophyll and N and S content in leaves significantly increase with sulfur levels up to 50 kg S ha-1 compared to 0 kg S ha-1. Ahmad et al. (2000) report that sulfur application significantly increased acetyl-CoA concentration, acetyl-CoA carboxylase activity, and soluble protein and starch content in developing seeds. Plants take sulfur primarily in the form of S04-2 by a specific transport protein (Thompson et al., 1986). Shallow soils with low organic matter content are likely to provide little sulphate (Holmes, 1980). Total chlorophyll content and peroxidase activity increases with higher sulfur levels (Khanpara et al., 1993). Abiotic stresses contribute to the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), superoxide radical (O2-), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and hydroxyl radical (OH-), with the last one as the most cytotoxic. These ROS cause per- turbation of basic metabolic pathways and damage mem- branes and organic molecules, mainly proteins, DNA, and pigments (Fridovich, 1986; Imlay and Linn, 1988) as well as sulfur containing amino acids in proteins (Hernandez et al., 2000). Plants use different strategies to solve this problem. For instance, one strategy is that plants increase the activ- ity of antioxidant enzymes. The toxic superoxide radical is rapidly dismutated by superoxide dismutase (SOD) to H2O2, a product that is relatively stable and can be detoxified by catalase (CAT) and guaiacol peroxidases (Grant and Loake, 2000). Increased SOD activity is known to confer oxidative stress tolerance (Bowler et al., 1992). The balance between ROS production and activities of antioxidative enzymes determines whether oxidative signaling and/or damage will occur (Moller et al., 2007). The activities of these an- tioxidant enzymes are reported to increase under various environmental stresses (Hernandez et al., 1995; Hernandez et al., 2000). There are many reports in the literature that underline the intimate relationship between enhanced or constitutive antioxidant enzyme activities and increased resistance to environmental stresses in Brassica and other plant species (Sreenivasulu et al., 2000; Rameeh et al., 2004; Khanna-Chopra and Selote, 2007). Sulfur application will improve seed and oil quality and is also a key factor for oil formation. In the present study, four sulfur levels: 0, 12, 24 and 36 kg ha-1 along with 115 kg N ha-1 were applied to evaluate economic yield and also enzyme activity of rapeseed under rainfed conditions. Materials and methods A field experiment was carried out in a farm in Aben- dankash located in Sari, Iran (53º7’ E, 36º32” N, 60 m a.s.l.) during the 2006-2007 cropping seasons. The soil was classified as a deep loam soil (Typic Xerof luents, USDA classification), which maintained an average of 280 g clay kg-1, 560 g silt kg-1, 160 g sand kg-1, and 22.4 g organic matter kg-1 with a pH of 7.3. Soil samples were found to have 45 kg ha-1 of mineral nitrogen (N) in the upper 30-cm profile. The experiment received 50 kg P ha-1 and 75 kg K ha-1. The average temperature was around 15.5°C and the average rainfall was 36.7 mm. Seeds of the rapeseed cultivar Hy- ola401 were planted on October 18, 2006. Seeds were sown with a uniform seed rate of 5 kg ha-1 in all plots with the help of a hand hoe in straight rows. The experiment was set in a randomized complete block design with four replicates. The treatments under study included different amounts of ammonium sulfate (containing 21% nitrogen and 24% sulfur) and urea fertilizer (containing 46% nitrogen): S0: 250 kg ha-1 urea; S1: 227 kg ha-1 urea+50 kg ha-1 ammonium sulfate; S2: 204 kg ha-1 urea + 100 kg ha-1 ammonium sulfate; and S3: 182 kg ha-1 urea + 150 kg ha-1 ammonium sulfate. S0, S1, S2 and S3 included 0, 12, 24 and 36 kg ha-1 S, respectively, and all treatments maintained 115 kg N ha-1. All cultural practices were uniformly applied to all plots. All plant protection measures were adopted to keep the crop free from insect pests. Seed yield (adjusted to kg ha-1) was recorded based on three middle rows in each plot. For enzyme assays, frozen leaves were ground to fine powder with liquid nitrogen and extracted with ice-cold 0.1 M Tris- HCl buffer (pH 7.5) containing 5% (w/v) sucrose and 0.1% 2- mercaptoethanol (3:1 buffer volume/FW). The homog- enate was centrifuged at 10,000 g for 20 min, at 4°C, and the supernatant was used for enzyme activity. Regarding the enzyme assay, superoxide dismutase activity which has the ability to inhibit the phothochemical reduction of nitro- blue tetrazolium (NBT) (Beauchamp and Fridovich, 1971), was determined according to the method by Dhindsa et al. (1980). For the SOD assay, the reaction mixture contained 50 mM K-phosphate buffer (pH 7.8), 13 mM methionine, 75 µM NBT, 0.1 µM EDTA, 4 µM ribof lavin and the required amount of enzyme extract. The reaction was initiated by adding ribof lavin and placing the tubes under two 15 W f luorescent lamps for 15 min. A complete reaction mixture without enzyme, which gave the maximal color, served as control. Peroxidase activity was assayed adopting the method by Polle et al. (1994). According to this method, Peroxidase activity was determined at 436 nm by its ability to convert guaiacol to tetraguaiacol (E = 26.6 mM-1 cm-1) The reaction mixture contained 100 mM K-phosphate 313Rameeh, Niakan, and Hossein Mohammadi: Sulfur effects on sugar content, enzyme activity and seed yield of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) buffer (pH 7.0), 20.1 mM guaiacol, 10 mM H2O2, and the enzyme extract. The increase in absorbance was recorded by the addition of H2O2 at 436 nm for 5 min. CAT activity was determined by monitoring the disappearance of H2O2 at 240 nm (E = 40 mM-1 cm-1) according to the method by Aebi (1984). The reaction mixture contained 50 mM K- phosphate buffer (pH 7.0), 33 mM H2O2 and the enzyme extract. To estimate sugar and starch contents in leaves, chopped leaves were fixed in boiling 80% ethanol. Sugar contents were estimated colorimetrically by the method described by Nelson (1994) at 500 nm. Data recorded were analyzed statistically, using analysis of variance (ANOVA) with appropriate techniques for randomized complete block design (Steel and Torrie, 1980). For the analysis, an Excel worksheet was programmed. All the analyses were performed using the software SAS version 9 (SAS Institute Inc., 2004). Results and discussion Significant mean square, which indicates significant dif- ferent effects of sulfur levels, were found for the traits including leaf nitrate reductase, root nitrate reductase, leaf and root sugars, root peroxidase, leaf catalase, and seed yield (Tab. 1). Leaf peroxidase activity was not affected by sulfur levels. Sulfur application along with seed yield that improves oil quality is a critical factor for oil formation. Sulfur shortage adversely decreases yield as well as protein and enzyme synthesis (Scherer, 2001). Means comparisons of leaf nitrate reductase as in- f luenced by different levels of sulfur is presented in Table 2 and Fig ure 1. Su lf ur application induced a significant increase in activity of leaf nitrate reduc- tase. Leaf nitrate reductase activity varied from 0.82 to 2.90 mM No2- g-1 in S0 (control) and S3 (36 kg S ha-1), respectively. Mean values of leaf nitrate reductase activity were classified into two statistical groups for the application of four S levels. This trait related to S0 and S1 determined the same group, and for S2 and S3 it was also classified in the same statistical group. Ahmad et al. (2000) report that sulfur application significantly increases acetyl-CoA concentration acetyl-CoA carboxylase activity, soluble pro- tein and starch content in developing seeds. A significant positive correlation was determined between leaf nitrate reductase activity and sugar content in leaf and root of rapeseed (Tab. 3). Therefore, any variation for this enzyme will have considerable effect on leaf and root sugar contents. Root nitrate reductase activity ranged from 0.33 to 1 mM No2- g-1 in S0 and S3, respectively. A significant positive cor- relation between root nitrate reductase activity and sugar content in leaf and root of rapeseed was observed (Tab. 3). Due to a significant positive correlation between activity of root nitrate reductase and seed yield, increasing this enzyme in the roots followed by sulfur application will have considerable effect on rapeseed seed yield. Leaf sugar was positively affected by sulfur levels, and it varied from 0.72 to 2.29 g g-1 DW for S0 and S3, respectively. A highly significant TABLE 1. Randomized complete block (RCBD) analysis of variance for the studied traits. MSdf S.o.V. Seed yield Leaf catalase Root peroxidase Leaf peroxidase Root sugarLeaf sugar Root nitrate reductase Leaf nitrate reductase 39126.52**0.001**0.0010.050.06*0.120.082Replicate 365024**1.57**0.0002*0.00010.41**1.39**0.24*2.65**3Treatments 854320.080.000030.0010.040.010.030.236Error 11.565.911.434.724.56.6725.727.4Coefficient of variation (C.V.) % S.O.V.: source of variance, df: degree of freedom, MS: mean squares. *, ** Significant at P<0.05 and 0.01, respectively. TABLE 2. Mean comparison of yield components, seed yield and oil percentage. Sulfur (kg ha-1) Leaf nitrate reductase (mM No2 - g -1) Root nitrate reductase (mM No2 - g-1) Leaf sugar (g g-1 DW) Root sugar (g g-1 DW) Leaf peroxidase (oD g-1 fW min-1) Root peroxidase (oD g-1 fW min-1) Leaf catalase (µM H2o2 d min -1) Seed yield (kg ha-1) S0=0 0.82b 0.33c 0.72d 0.40c 0.053a 0.036b 3.87b 2744b S1=12 1.18b 0.63bc 1.07c 0.63bc 0.056a 0.041b 4.50b 2844ab S2=24 2.12a 0.77ab 1.55b 0.91ab 0.052a 0.047ab 4.87ab 3190ab S3=36 2.90a 1.00a 2.29a 1.26a 0.053a 0.057a 5.60a 3215a S0, S1, S2 and S3 included 0, 12, 24 and 36 Kg S ha -1, respectively, and all treatments maintained 115 Kg N ha-1. 314 Agron. Colomb. 37(3) 2019 fiGURE 1. Means of plant heights, yield components, seed yields and oil contents of rapeseed var. Hyola401 under different sulfur levels (S0, S1, S2 and S3 including 0, 12, 24 and 36 kg S ha -1, respectively). Error bars indicate 95% confidence intervals. S ee d yi el d (k g ha -1 ) Sulfur levels Le af C at al as e (µ M H 2O 2 d m in -1 ) Sulfur levels R oo t p er ox id as e (O D g -1 F W m in -1 ) Sulfur levels Le af p er ox id as e (O D g -1 F W m in -1 ) Sulfur levels R oo t s ug ar ( g g- 1 D W ) Sulfur levels Le af s ug ar ( g g- 1 D W ) Sulfur levels R oo t n itr at e re du ct as e (m M N o2 g -1 ) Sulfur levels Le af n itr at e re du ct as e (m M N o 2 - g -1 ) Sulfur levels S 0 S 1 S 2 S 3 0 1 2 3 4 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 S 0 S 1 S 2 S 3 S 0 S 1 S 2 S 3 S 0 S 1 S 2 S 3 S 0 S 1 S 2 S 3 S 0 S 1 S 2 S 3 S 0 S 1 S 2 S 3 S 0 S 1 S 2 S 3 315Rameeh, Niakan, and Hossein Mohammadi: Sulfur effects on sugar content, enzyme activity and seed yield of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) positive correlation (0.75**) was determined between leaf sugar content and seed yield; therefore, increasing sulfur levels had a direct increasing effect on leaf sugar content, which had an escalating effect on seed yield. Root sugar content was positively affected by sulfur levels and changed from 0.40 to 1.26 g g-1 DW for S0 and S3, respectively (Tab. 2). Sulfur levels had an increasing effect on root peroxidase activity and this enzyme ranged from 0.036 to 0.057 OD g-1 FW min-1 in roots. Leaf catalase activity was significantly affected by sulfur levels, and the mean value of this enzyme activity varied from 3.87 to 5.60 µM H2O2 d min-1 for S0 and S3. Bashir et al. (2015) indicate that the activity of ascorbate peroxidase, glutathione reductase and catalase declined in Cd-treated and S-deficient plants, but it was upregulated in the presence of sulfur.  Sulfur application signif icantly increased seed yield compared to control (S0 level) and it ranged from 2744 to 3215 kg ha-1 in S0 and S3 (Tab. 3). S3 (36 kg ha-1 S) increased seed yield on 17%. Sulfur application improves seed yield quantity and oil quality and also sulfur shortage adversely decreases yield, protein and enzyme synthesis (Scherer, 2001; Rehmanuh et al., 2013). Conclusion All the traits except leaf peroxidase activity were signifi- cantly affected by sulfur levels. A significant positive cor- relation between leaf nitrate reductase and sugar content in rapeseed leaves and roots was found. Therefore, any variation of this enzyme will have considerable effect on leaf and root sugar contents. Due to a significant positive correlation between root nitrate reductase activity and seed yield, increasing this enzyme in roots by sulfur ap- plication will have a considerable effect on rapeseed seed yields. Leaf sugar was positively affected by sulfur levels and its high mean value was observed at level S3. A highly significant positive correlation determined between leaf sugar content and seed yield (0.75**) was observed. Thus, increasing sulfur levels had a direct increasing effect on leaf sugar content, which had an accelerating effect on seed yield. Sulfur application significantly increased seed yield compared to S0 level, and it ranged from 2744 to 3215 kg ha-1 in S0 and S3. Literature cited Aebi, H. 1984. Catalase in vitro. Methods Enzymol. 105, 121-126. Ahmad, A. and M.Z. Abdin. 2000. Interactive effect of sulphur and nitrogen on the oil and protein contents and on the fatty acid profiles of oil in the seeds of rapeseed (Brassica campestris L.) and mustard (Brassica juncea L. Czern. and Coss.). J. Agron. Crop Sci. 185(1), 49-54. Doi: 10.1046/j.1439-037X.2000.00401.x Ahmad, G., A. Jan, I. Arif, and M. Arif. 2006. Phenology and physiol- ogy of canola as affected by nitrogen and sulphur fertilization. J. Agron. 5, 555-562. Doi: 10.3923/ja.2006.555.562 Balint, T. and Z. Rengel. 2009. Differential sulphur efficiency in canola genotypes at vegetative and grain maturity stage. Crop Past. Sci. 60, 262-270. Doi: 10.1071/CP08224 Bashir, H., M.M. Ibrahim, R. Bagheri, J. Ahmad, I.A. Arif, M.A. Baig, and M.I. Qureshi. 2015. Inf luence of sulfur and cadmium on antioxidants, phytochelatins and growth in Indian mustard. AoB Plants 7(1), 1-13. Doi: 10.1093/aobpla/plv001 Beauchamp, C. and I. Fridovich. 1971. Superoxidase dismutase: improved assays and an assay applicable to acrylamide gels. Anal. Bioch. 44, 276-286. Doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(71)90370-8 Bowler, C., M.W. Montagu, and D. Inze. 1992. Superoxide dismutase and stress tolerance. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 43, 83-116. Doi: 10.1146/annurev.pp.43.060192.000503 Castellano, S.D. and R.P. Dick. 1991. Cropping and sulphur fertiliza- tion inf luence on sulphur transformation in soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 55, 1, 114-121. Chen, X.J., Z.J. Zhu, X.L. Ni, and Q.Q. Qlan. 2006. Effect of nitrogen and sulfur supply on glucosinolates in Brassica campestris ssp. chinensis. Agric. Sci. China 5(8), 603-608. TABLE 3. Pearson correlation coefficient estimates of biochemical traits and seed yield in different levels of sulfur used on a rapeseed variety. Traits Leaf nitrate reductase Root nitrate reductase Leaf sugar Root sugar Leaf peroxidase Root peroxidase Leaf catalase Seed yield Leaf nitrate reductase 1 Root nitrate reductase 0.67* 1 Leaf sugar 0.88** 0.74** 1 Root sugar 0.78** 0.76** 0.86** 1 Leaf peroxidase -0.15 0.35 0.06 -0.09 1 Root peroxidase 0.21 -0.18 -0.07 -0.19 -0.19 1 Leaf catalase 0.12 -0.24 0.01 0.25 0.25 0.65* 1 Seed yield 0.53 0.71* 0.75** 0.27 0.27 -0.36 -0.18 1 *, ** Significant at P<0.05 and 0.01, respectively. 316 Agron. Colomb. 37(3) 2019 Fridov ich, I. 1986. Biolog ica l ef fects of superox ide rad ica l. Arch. Biochem. Biophysic. 247(1), 1-11. Doi: 10.1016/0003- 9861(86)90526-6 Giannopolitis, C.N. and S.K. Ries. 1977. Superoxide dismutases: I. occurrence in higher plants. Plant Physiol. 59, 309-314. Grant, J.J. and G.J. Loake. 2000. Role of reactive oxygen intermedi- ates and cognate redox signaling in disease resistance. Plant Physiol. 124, 21-29. Doi: 10.1104/pp.124.1.21 Hernandez, J.A., A. Jimenez, P. Mullineaux, and F. Sevilla. 2000. Tolerance of pea (Pisum sativum L.) to long-term salt stress is associated with induction of antioxidant defences. Plant Cell Environ. 23, 853-862. Doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3040.2000.00602.x Hernandez, J.A., E. Olmos, F.J. Corpas, F. Sevilla, and L.A. Del Rio. 1995. Salt-induced oxidative stress in chloroplasts of pea plants. Plant Sci. 105, 151-167. Doi: 10.1016/0168-9452(94)04047-8 Holmes, M.R.J. 1980. Nutrition of the oilseed rape crop. Applied Science Publishers ltd., London. Imlay, J.A. and S. Linn. 1998. DNA damage and oxygen radical toxicity. Science 240, 1302-1309. Doi: 10.1126/science.3287616 Jackson, G.D. 2000. Effects of nitrogen and sulfur on canola yield and nutrient uptake. Agron. J. 92(4), 644-649. Doi: 10.2134/ agronj2000.924644x Jan, A., G. Ahmad, T. Jan, M. Jamal, and F. Subhan. 2008. Oil yields of Canola as affected by N and S levels and methods of ap- plication under rainfed condition. Sarhad J. Agric. 24(1), 1-10. Jan, A., N. Khan, I.A. Khan, and B. Khattak. 2002. Chemical com- position of canola as affected by nitrogen and sulphur. Asian J. Plant Sci. 1, 519-521. Doi: 10.3923/ajps.2002.519.521 Kandil, H. and N. Gad. 2012. Growth and oil production of canola as affected by different sulphur sources. J. Basic. Appl. Sci. Res. 2, 5196-5202. Kayupova, G.A. and L.K. Klyshev. 1984. Superoxide dismutase of pea root under the inf luence of high NaCl concentrations. Plant Physiol. 31, 441-445. Khanna-Chopra, R. and D.S. Selote. 2007. Acclimation to drought stress generates oxidative stress tolerance in drought-resistant than -susceptible wheat cultivar under field conditions. Envi- ron. Exp. Bot. 60, 276-283. Doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2006.11.004 Khanpara, V.N., B.L. Porwal, and J.E. Patel. 1993. Effect of levels and modes of sulphur application on biochemical changes in mus- tard (Brassica juncea) leaves. Indian J. Agron. 38(3), 410-413. Kumar, R., D. Singh, and H. Singh. 2002. Growth and yield of Bras- sica species as inf luence by sulphur application and sowing dates. Indian J. Agron. 47(3), 418-421. Malhi, S., Y. Gan, and J. Raney. 2007. Yield, seed quality and sulphur uptake of Brassica oil seed crops in response to sulphur fertil- ization. Agron. J. 99, 570-577. Doi: 10.2134/agronj2006.0269 Malhi, S.S. and K.S. Gill. 2002. Effectiveness of sulphate-S fertiliza- tion at different growth stages for yield, seed quality and S uptake of canola. Can. J. Plant Sci. 82, 665-674. Doi: 10.4141/ P01-184 Doi: 10.4141/P01-184 Marschner, P. 2012. Mineral nutrition of higher plants. 3rd ed. Aca- demic Press, London. Moller, I.M., P.E. Jensen, and A. Hansson. 2007. Oxidative modifica- tions to cellular components in plants. Ann. Rev. Plant Biol. 58, 459-481. Doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.58.032806.103946 Nelson, N. 1994. A photometric adaptation of the Somogyi method for determination of glucose. J. Biol. Chem. 53, 375-378. Polle, A., T. Otter, and F. Seifert. 1994. Apoplastic peroxidases and lignification in needles of Norway Spruce (Picea abies L.). Plant Physiol. 106, 53-60. Doi: 10.1104/pp.106.1.53 Rameeh, V., A. Rezai, and G. Saeidi. 2004. Study of salinity tolerance in rapeseed. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 35, 2849-2866. Doi: 10.1081/CSS-200036472 Rehmanuh, Q., M. Iqbal, I. Farooq, and S.M.A. Afzal. 2013. Sulphur application improves the growth, seed yield and oil quality of canola. Acta Physiol. Plant. 35(10), 1331-339. Doi: 10.1007/ s11738-013-1331-9 SAS Institute Inc. 2004. SAS/STAT user’s guide. Version 9. Fourth Edition. Statistical Analysis Institute Inc. Cary, North Caro- lina, USA. Sattar, A., M.A. Cheema, M.A. Wahid, M.F. Saleem, and M. Hassan. 2011. Interactive effect of sulphur and nitrogen on growth, yield and quality of canola. Crop Environ. 2, 32-37. Scherer, H.W. 2001. Sulphur in crop production. Eur. J. Agron. 14(2), 81-111. Doi: 10.1016/S1161-0301(00)00082-4 Sharifi, R.S. 2012. Sulphur fertilizer effects on grain yield and the sum of physiological indices of canola (Brassica napus L.). Ann. Biol. Res. 3(11), 5034-5041. Sreenivasasula, N., B. Grimm, U. Wobus, and W. Weschke. 2000. Differential response of antioxidant compounds to salinity stress in salt-tolerant and salt-sensitive seedlings of foxtail millet (Setaria italica). Physiol. Plant. 109, 435-442. Doi: 10.1034/j.1399-3054.2000.100410.x Steel, R.G.D. and J.H. Torrie. 1980. Principles and procedures of statistics: a biometrical approach. 2nd ed. McGraw Hill Book Co., New York, USA. Thompson, J.F., I.K. Smith, and J.T. Madison. 1986. Sulfur metabo- lism in plants. In: Tabatabai, M.A. (ed.). Sulfur in Agriculture. Agronomy Society of America, Madison, USA. Zhao, F., P.E. Bilsborrow, E.J. Evans, and J.K. Syers. 1993. Sulphur turnover in the developing pods of single and double low va- rieties of oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). J. Sci. Food Agric. 62(2), 111-119. Doi: 10.1002/jsfa.2740620203