In vitro inhibition attempts and bio-elicitation of Solanum lycopersicum L. by chitin and chitosan against Ralstonia solanacearum, the causal agent of bacterial wilt Received for publication: August 10, 2021. Accepted for publication: December 30, 2021. Doi: 10.15446/agron.colomb.v39n3.97746 1 Plant, Animal and Agro-Industry Production Laboratory, Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, Ibn Tofail University, Kenitra (Morocco). * Corresponding author: amine.rkhaila@uit.ac.ma Agronomía Colombiana 39(3), 355-363, 2021 ABSTRACT RESUMEN Ralstonia solanacearum is one of the most destructive patho- gens of vegetables causing very important economic losses. In 2019, 20 strains of R. solanacearum were collected from potato tubers in Morocco. After their identification, the inhibitory effect of colloidal solutions of chitin and/or chitosan was evalu- ated in vitro on a solid medium (Mueller-Hinton) supplemented with these biopolymers. The concentrations (25, 50, or 100 mg L-1) contributed to significant inhibition of the growth of the isolated strains that led to an inhibition of 45.04% with the combination of chitin-chitosan (100 mg L-1), 58.92% with the addition of 100 mg L-1 of chitin, and 68.74% in the presence of chitosan at 25 mg L-1. Likewise, in experiments with Solanum lycopersicum L. seedlings, chitin derivatives significantly pro- moted stem and root growth. Stem length increased by 54.95% when chitin was added at 25 mg L-1, while soil amendment with 100 mg L-1 of chitosan increased root length by 82.55% compared to the control. The severity of bacterial wilt due to R. solanacearum was reduced by 117.02% when we added 100 mg L-1 of chitosan to the soil. However, the severity of this disease decreased by 142.86% when the soil was amended with chitin at 50 mg L-1. These findings are consistent with prior research that suggests using this technique to manage bacterial wilt caused by R. solanacearum. Ralstonia solanacearum es uno de los patógenos más destruc- tivos en plantas hortícolas, ocasionando pérdidas económicas muy importantes. En 2019, 20 aislamientos de R. solanacearum fueron recolectados de tubérculos de papa en Marruecos. Pos- terior a su identificación, se evaluó in vitro el efecto inhibitorio de soluciones coloidales de quitina y/o quitosano en medio sólido (Mueller-Hinton) suplementado con estos biopolímeros. Las concentraciones (25, 50, o 100 mg L-1) contribuyeron a una inhibición significativa del crecimiento de los aislamientos, generando una inhibición del 45.04% con la combinación de quitina-quitosano (100 mg L-1), del 58.92% con la adición de 100 mg L-1 de quitina, y del 68.74% en presencia de quitosano a 25 mg L-1. Así mismo, en los experimentos con plántulas de Sola- num lycopersicum L., los derivados de la quitina demostraron promover el crecimiento del tallo y de las raíces de forma signi- ficativa. La longitud del tallo aumentó en un 54.95% cuando se añadió quitina a 25 mg L-1, mientras que la enmienda del suelo con 100 mg L-1 de quitosano aumentó la longitud de la raíz en un 82.55% en comparación con el control. La severidad de la marchitez bacteriana causada por R. solanacearum se redujo en un 117.02% cuando se adicionaron 100 mg L-1 de quitosano al suelo. Sin embargo, la severidad de la enfermedad se redujo en un 142.86% cuando se enmendó el suelo con quitina a 50 mg L-1. Estos resultados son coherentes con investigaciones anteriores que sugieren el uso de esta técnica para el manejo de la marchitez bacteriana causada por R. solanacearum. Key words: biopolymers, defense stimulation, tomato, growth inhibition. Palabras clave: biopolímeros, estimulación de la defensa, tomate, inhibición del crecimiento. In vitro inhibition attempts and bio-elicitation of Solanum lycopersicum L. by chitin and chitosan against Ralstonia solanacearum, the causal agent of bacterial wilt Intentos de inhibición in vitro y bioelicitación de Solanum lycopersicum L. mediante quitina y quitosano contra Ralstonia solanacearum, el agente causal de la marchitez bacteriana Amine Rkhaila1*, Mouhatti Saga1, Sofia Ghizlan Grohs1, and Khadija Ounine1 Introduction Market gardening is a vital agricultural sector in Africa be- cause of its nutritional value and the significant economic income it generates. This sector has the capacity to serve as an impetus for agricultural and economic diversification by directing production towards local or export markets (Sadi et al., 2020). The tomato sector in Morocco plays an important socio- economic role. In fact, at the economic level, tomato exports have a major place since they generate about 1.1 billion USD in foreign currency. Socially, the sector is a generator of jobs creating an average of 9 million working days per year at the production level but also in packaging and processing (Elame, 2019). https://doi.org/10.15446/agron.colomb.v39n3.97746 356 Agron. Colomb. 39(3) 2021 Bacterial wilt caused by Ralstonia solanacearum is one of the major land-based vascular diseases that produces considerable damage to many crops of worldwide economic importance (Mansfield et al., 2012). The disease was dis- covered in Morocco for the first time on potatoes (Solanum tuberosum) in 1999 as the so-called biovar 2 (Poussier et al., 2000). Over the last 20 years, this taxonomy has undergone several revisions. The classifications were consolidated into four separate phylotypes based on the strain’s geographic origin (Phylotype I, Phylotype II, Phylotype III, and Phylo- type IV) (Cellier, 2010). According to Ravelomanantsoa et al. (2018), the Moroccan strain is grouped into Phylotype IIB-1 that belongs to cluster A. Penetration of this bacte- rium into plant tissues is ensured by wounds produced during secondary root development, insect injuries, and cultural practices. After the death of the host plant and until contact with a new host, the bacterium develops various survival strategies, such as viable non-cultivable forms and biofilm formation (EPPO, 2018). Due to the ability of R. solanacearum to develop endophytically, migrate through water, interact with weeds, and persist in soil, particularly in the deeper layers, this pathogen causes direct yield losses that vary significantly depending on the host, soil type, cultivar, cropping plan, climate, and type of strain (Elphin- stone, 2005). According to some studies, bacterial wilt can result in significant yield losses in bananas (80% to 100%), potatoes (33% to 90%), tomatoes (0% to 91%), groundnuts (0% to 20%), and tobacco (10% to 30%) (Yuliar et al., 2015). Considering the serious consequences that pesticides may have on human health (male infertility, cancers, negative effects on fetuses, etc.), chitin and chitosan seem to be well-known and eco-friendly biocontrol agents due to their biodegradable, nontoxic, and biocompatible proper- ties (Hassan & Chang, 2017). They act by increasing the synthesis of secondary metabolites that enhance plant immunological defenses (phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL) and tyrosine ammonia lyase (TAL)) (Khan et al., 2003). Recently, some studies have found that chitin and its derivatives have strong antibacterial activities in vitro and in vivo against a variety of plant pathogenic bacteria like Ralstonia solanacearum (Farag et al., 2017) and Xan- thomonas spp. (Ramkissoon et al., 2016). These reactions are the consequence of the induction of multiple defensive responses in host plants, including the accumulation of phytoalexins, proteinase inhibitors, and pathogen-related (PR) proteins, callose formation and lignin production (El Hadrami et al., 2010). This biotechnological approach to agriculture promises to increase the efficacy of agrochemicals while reducing their negative impact on the environment. Multiple evidence suggests that chitin and chitosan might be an innovative solution for the regulated release of different agrochemicals such as pesticides, micronutrients, fertilizers, and plant hormones, and they can play a dual function in plant growth promotion and biocontrol of phytopathogens (Malerba & Cerana, 2018). Foliar treatment of a com- mercial chitosan formulation reduced the prevalence of Xanthomonas vesicatoria in tomato plants in vivo (Li et al., 2010). Furthermore, the use of the same chitosan solution has made it possible to limit the incidence of Pseudomonas f luorescens infections on broccoli plants (Ramkissoon et al., 2016). The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of mul- tiple treatments based on chitin and/or chitosan to protect Solanum lycopersicum L. against R. solanacearum attack. Materials and methods R. solanacearum isolation and biochemical identification Sample collection Potato tubers (variety Désirée (Red Skin)) were collected from a local market of the M’Nasra’s region in the province of Kenitra, Morocco (Fig. 1). The collected samples show typical symptoms of R. solancearum infection (creamy exudates from the vascular rings and eyes of tubers). Isolation medium Five potato tubers were carefully cleaned with water and surface sterilized with 70% ethanol; a sterile scalpel was used to cut a transverse section. After crushing the tuber, vascular exudates were sampled with a sterile loop and streaked immediately onto SMSA medium (Siri et al., 2011), and incubated in Petri dishes at 28°C for 3 to 5 d. Colonies with the characteristic R. solanacearum phenotype (irre- gular shaped, f luidal, and completely white or with a pink core) were subcultured onto tetrazolium chloride agar (TZC) medium and purified for further study (Sikirou et al., 2017). Biochemical tests for R. solanacearum identification For validation of R. solanacearum isolates, four biochemical assays were conducted, including gram staining reaction, potassium hydroxide solubility test, the Levan test, and the sugar fermentation test (Rahman et al., 2010). Identification of virulent and avirulent isolates The virulent (colonies with pink or light red color or cha- racteristic red center and whitish margin) and avirulent (smaller, off-white and non-f luidal colonies) strains of R. 357Rkhaila, Saga, Ghizlan Grohs, and Ounine: In vitro inhibition attempts and bio-elicitation of Solanum lycopersicum L. by chitin and chitosan against Ralstonia solanacearum, the causal agent of bacterial wilt solanacearum were identified in a triphenyl tetrazolium chloride (TTC) medium containing 0.005% TTC (Kelman, 1954). Virulence of the R. solanacearum strain The virulence of R. solanacearum was assessed by inocu- lating tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) plants at the six-leaf stage by infiltration, using a hypodermic syringe on the underside of the leaves. The bacterial concentration used for this purpose was of the order of 108 CFU ml-1 (DO600 = 0.28) (Adebayo & Ekpo, 2005). The inoculated plants were then repotted in pots containing Maâmora forest soil (previously sterilized by tyndalliza- tion) (Bank et al., 2008) plus commercial peat at a rate of 1/3. According to the USDA, the soil of the Maâmora forest is made up of fine loamy sands with a clay component (De Mahieu et al., 2020). These pots were then transferred to a greenhouse at a temperature of 23 ± 2°C for 7 d. The appearance of necrotic spots on the surface of the areas of inoculation by R. solanacearum demonstrated virulence. However, when no reaction was observed, virulence was considered negative (Schaad et al., 2001). Source of chitin and chitosan Chitin and chitosan were extracted from shrimp shells of Prapenaeus longirostris following the protocol described in previous studies (Rkhaila & Ounine, 2018). Table 1 summarizes the characteristics of these products. Colloidal chitin preparation Colloidal chitin was made from extracted chitin using a modified process developed by Hsu and Lockwood (1975). Forty g of chitin powder were added to 600 ml of concen- trated HCl. The chitin was precipitated by the addition of 2 L of distilled water at 10°C after 2 h 30 min of stirring. The filtrate was rinsed with water until neutrality. Chitosan solubilization The modified technique of El Ghaouth et al. (1991) was adopted to solubilize extracted chitosan. Eighty ml of distilled water and 2.5 ml of HCl 10 N were added to 1 g of chitosan. After that, the volume was completed with distilled water up to 100 ml. Consequently, the pH of the solution was adjusted to 5.6 using 0.1 ml NaOH. Solanum lycopersicum seed origin The seeds used in the experiments belonged to species of the Solanaceae family from a standard variety (Rio Grande) and were homogeneous and of the same generation. The seeds are listed in the French varieties in the official catalog of the ONSSA - Morocco (Office National de Sécurité Sani- taire des Produits Alimentaires, Morocco) and authorized for sale on the Moroccan markets. Evaluation of the effect of biopolymers on the growth of R. solanacearum in vitro After adjusting the bacterial concentration of a 24 h cul- ture of R. solanacearum to 108 CFU ml-1 (Rodrigues et al., FIGURE 1. Potato tubers (variety Désirée (Red Skin)) infected by the causal agent of the bacterial wilt, Ralstonia solanacearum. TABLE 1. Summary of quantities obtained after extraction of chitin and chitosan from shrimp (Prapenaeus longirostris) shells. Product Quantity (g) Ash (%) Moisture (%) Degree of acetylation (%) Shrimp shell powder 100.0 - 55.08 - Chitin 50.00 51.2 - 90 Chitosan 23.93 - - 1.076 358 Agron. Colomb. 39(3) 2021 2011), 0.1 ml of this suspension was inoculated into 10 ml of Mueller Hinton broth. An aliquot of 1 ml of this well homogenized suspension was taken. Ten µl of this suspen- sion was inoculated by streaking on Mueller Hinton agar. The plates were incubated at 26 ± 1°C for 24 h. The liquid dilution method coupled with agar spreading was used as described by Hoekou et al. (2012) with some modifications. The assay was made by introducing into a sterile hemolysis tube 0.5 ml of the colloidal solution of chitin, chitosan, or chitin-chitosan mixture at 25, 50, or 100 mg L-1 with 10 µl of the microbial suspension. In the control tube, the extract was substituted with 0.5 ml of sterile nutrient broth. The tubes were incubated at 26 ± 1°C for 48 h; then, the tests and controls were distributed on Mueller Hinton agar medium at a rate of 10 plates per tube. After incubation at 37°C for 48 h, colonies were counted on each plate and the percentages of survival and inhibition were calculated in relation to the negative control according to Equation 1 (Hoekou et al., 2012): % Inhibition =  1 − Number of bacterial colonies counted on the test Petri dish   ×100 (1) Number of bacterial colonies counted on the control Petri dish In vivo test on R. solanacearum Inoculation of S. lycopersicum seedlings Solanum lycopersicum seedlings were grown in peat-based germination plates. At the three-leaf stage, the seedlings were collected from their substrate, and the roots cleaned with running water and lightly rubbed with cotton soaked in soapy water. Subsequently, the roots were washed until the soap was completely removed. Then, these were soaked for 30 min in various concentrations of chitin, chitosan, or chitin-chitosan mixture at 25, 50 or 100 mg L-1 with Tween 80 (0.01%) added. For control, the root system was soaked in sterile distilled water containing Tween 80 (0.01%, v/v) (Benhamou & Thériault, 1992). Finally, these seedlings were transferred to plastic pots containing Maâmora soil and commercial peat at a ratio of 1/3. One d later, the seedlings were removed for a second time from their pots and washed with tap water. Once dried, the roots were wounded with a small diameter sterile needle to facilitate the entry of the bacteria (Chandrashekara et al., 2012). The tomato seedlings were then inoculated by soaking for 10 min in R. solanacearum bacterial suspension (108 CFU ml-1) before being replanted in their starting pots. During the greenhouse-growing period (7 weeks), the plants were amended every week (once a week) with a 100 ml solution of chitin, chitosan or the chitin-chitosan mix- ture at 25, 50, or 100 mg L-1. Then, the length of the shoot/ root part and the foliar alteration index were calculated. Assessment of the degree of infection Leaf alteration The expression of leaf symptoms was estimated by a leaf index using the following rating scale (Douira et al., 1994): 0: leaves of healthy appearance; 1: cotyledonary leaf: wilting or yellowing of the cotyledon- ary leaf; 2: falling of the cotyledonary leaf; 3: wilting or yellowing of the true leaf; 4: necrosis of the true leaf; 5: fall of the true leaf. The sum of the scores in relation to the number of leaves constitutes the leaf alteration index. An average index was then calculated for each plant (Douira & Lahlou, 1989): LAI = [∑ (i Xi)] (2) 6 NtF where LAI is the leaf alteration index; i is the leaf appear- ance scores from 0 to 5; Xi is the number of leaves with i score, and NtF is the total number of leaves. Statistical analysis A completely randomized design was used, and data were analyzed by analysis of variance (ANOVA) using the Tukey’s test at α = 0.05 and the IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 21.0. (IBM Corp. Armonk, NY, USA). Three replicates were made for the in vitro and in vivo tests. Results and discussion Biochemical tests for R. solanacearum identification The crystal violate reaction showed that the 20 isolated strains were gram negative because they did not retain the violet color. Microscopic examination revealed that the cells of virulent isolates are gram-negative, straight, or curved rod shaped. This observation was confirmed by the appearance of a viscous mass when potassium hydroxide was applied to bacterial cultures since KOH easily dissolves the thin layer of peptidoglycan of the cell 359Rkhaila, Saga, Ghizlan Grohs, and Ounine: In vitro inhibition attempts and bio-elicitation of Solanum lycopersicum L. by chitin and chitosan against Ralstonia solanacearum, the causal agent of bacterial wilt wall of gram-negative bacteria. This fact contributes to the release of its contents that generate the viscous mass (Razia et al., 2021). Furthermore, the positive result of the Levan test suggested that the R. solanacearum strains are Levan producers (Tab. 2). For sugar fermentation, R. solanacearum isolates had the ability to oxidize carbohydrates, as shown by color changes (reddish to yellow). The sugar fermentation test revealed that all R. solanacearum strains could oxidize the four basic sugars (dextrose, sucrose, mannitol, and lactose) generating acid and gas (Tab. 2). Identification of virulent and avirulent isolates A Kelman tetrazolium chloride (CTC) agar test distinguis- hed virulent from avirulent isolates of R. solanacearum. Additionally, in the TZC medium, these isolates generated pink or light red colonies or colonies with a distinctive red center and a white border (11 isolated strains), whe- reas avirulent isolates (9 isolated strains) produced tiny, off-white, and non-f luid colonies after 24 h of incubation. The results of this test showed that all R. solanacearum isolates (11 virulent strains) from the five potato tubers had gathered the typical pink or light-red colonies or co- lonies with a distinctive red center and a white border on the TZC medium (Ahmed et al., 2013). This proved that all isolates of R. solanacearum (11 virulent strains) were virulent (Chamedjeu et al., 2018) (Fig. 2). Virulence of R. solanacearum To ensure that the isolated strains were virulent, the un- derside of tobacco leaves was inoculated with a bacterial suspension of R. solanacearum at a concentration of 108 CFU ml-1. After incubation for 7 d, the development of necrotic spots was observed around the infiltration zones (Fig. 3). These findings are consistent with those published by Heikrujam et al. (2020), who discovered that R. solana- cearum could produce a hypersensitive reaction in tobacco leaves after 7 d. TABLE 2. Biochemical tests for Ralstonia solanacearum identification. Strain Gram staining reaction Potassium hydroxide Levan test Sugar fermentation R. solanacearum Gram + Gram − + + Dextrose Sucrose Lactose Mannitol – + + + + + FIGURE 2. Characteristic aspect of Ralstonia solanacearum. FIGURE 3. Appearance of necrotic spots on the underside of tobacco leaves produced by Ralstonia solanacearum. In vitro test on R. solanacearum The results of the inhibition effects of treatments based on chitin, chitosan, or their mixtures on R. solanacearum are reported in Table 3. From these results, all treatments resulted in the inhibi- tion of R. solanacearum growth on Mueller Hinton agar. Furthermore, we observed a dependence between the treatment concentration and the in vitro inhibitory effect of R. solanacearum. Based on the results of the in vitro test, we noted that all chitosan concentrations produced the highest suppression of bacterial growth, with values of 68.74%, 63.65%, and 360 Agron. Colomb. 39(3) 2021 67.29% for doses of 25, 50, and 100 mg L-1, respectively. However, the concentrations of chitin and the chitin- chitosan mixture showed a lower inhibitory effect than chitosan alone, as evidenced by inhibition percentages that did not exceed 58.92% for chitin and 45.04% for the mixture of the two biopolymers. TABLE 3. Ralstonia solanacearum growth inhibition percentage (Mueller Hinton solid media). Treatment (mg L-1) % Inhibition Chitin 25 20.87 ± 0.5 a 50 37.15 ± 1.6 b 100 58.92 ± 3.8 d Chitosan 25 68.74 ± 4.3 de 50 63.65 ± 3.2 d 100 67.29 ± 4.0 de Chitin + Chitosan 25 37.48 ± 2.4 b 50 40.24 ± 1.1 bc 100 45.04 ± 3.2 c Means in the same column with the same letter do not differ significantly from each other at the 5% level of significance according to the Tukey’s test. The study performed by Borines et al. (2015) demonstrates that chitosan caused growth inhibition of R. solanacearum in vitro, resulting in the appearance of 7 mm inhibition zones around discs imbibed with 300 mg L-1 of chitosan solubilized in acetic acid. The same authors related this effect to the high substitution of amino groups on chito- san chains, resulting in the enhancement of the positive cationic nature of chitosan in acidic solutions. This could lead to a greater chance of interaction between chitosan and the negatively charged cell walls of microorganisms (Mohy Eldin et al., 2008; Borines et al., 2015). Whereas the results obtained by Ting et al. (2013) con- firmed that an increasing chitosan concentration (from 0 to 0.15 mg ml-1) improved the inhibition of R. solanacearum with a higher rate of 74.3% obtained by applying 0.15 mg ml-1 of chitosan, analysis by transmission electron micros- copy showed that this effect is the result of the destruction of the bacterial cell membrane under the action of chitosan. Thus, chitosan inhibits the formation of biofilm in many bacteria, such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Listeria mono- cytogenes, and R. solanacearum (Kim et al., 2018). In vivo inoculation of seedlings of S. lycopersicum with R. solanacearum Table 4 reports the results of the growth parameters and the leaf alteration index of S. lycopersicum plants inoculated with R. solanacearum. The inoculation of S. lycopersicum seedlings strongly in- f luenced the development of both parts (shoots and roots) in the control plants that was expressed by mean lengths varying from 36.4 ± 7.1 cm to 29.8 ± 8.0 cm, respectively. However, plants treated with the biopolymers showed an ability to overcome infection and the expression of the characteristic symptoms of bacterial wilt at both stem and root levels. An improvement of 17.58% in the growth of the shoot was recorded in plants amended with chitin at 100 mg L-1. More- over, the treatment with 50 mg L-1 of this polymer resulted in the development of this parameter by more than 31%, while the lowest concentration (25 mg L-1) allowed for a significant increase in the growth of this part of the plants, by the expression of a difference of 54.95%. For treatments based on chitosan, the effect of this biopoly- mer was strictly related to its concentration. Consequently, the increase of the concentration generated a longer shoot. Improvements of 18.96, 15.66, and 40.11% compared to the inoculated control were observed in the plants amended with the chitosan at concentrations 25, 50, or 100 mg L-1, respectively (Fig. 4). Plants whose soil was amended with the chitin-chitosan mixture at 25 mg L-1 expressed an average length of 41.6 ± 6.5 cm; in other words, an improvement of 14.87% in stem length was observed compared to the control. Regarding the mean root length, we observed a highly significant improvement of this parameter in plants treated with chitosan at different concentrations. The strongest growth promotion was recorded by 100 mg L-1 of chitosan. This translates into a difference of 82.55% compared to the control. Similarly, chitin at 100 mg L-1 and the chitin-chitosan mixture at 25 mg L-1 showed a remarkable increase in root length compared to the inoculated control, resulting in a difference of 34.90% and 51.34%, respectively (Fig. 4). Seedlings amended with chitin and/or chitosan and in- oculated with R. solanacearum showed the lowest LAI compared to the control. This allowed a high level of protection for the plants against bacterial wilt. Conse- quently, differences ranging from 48.69% to 65.05% were recorded in the presence of the chitin-chitosan mixture, while significant differences were observed when the soil was amended with chitosan (72.30% to 117.02%) or in the presence of chitin (80.24% to 142.86%). These results 361Rkhaila, Saga, Ghizlan Grohs, and Ounine: In vitro inhibition attempts and bio-elicitation of Solanum lycopersicum L. by chitin and chitosan against Ralstonia solanacearum, the causal agent of bacterial wilt agree with those of Borines et al. (2015), who found that the soaking of roots in the 200 mg L-1 chitosan treatment (previously solubilized in acetic acid) before transplanting was effective in protecting the plants against the disease and, consequently, controlling bacterial wilt. Algam et al. (2010) showed that the soil amendment with chitosan at 10 mg ml-1 significantly reduced wilt due to R. solanacearum by 72% in tomato plants grown in a greenhouse. Seed treatment with the same concentration induced a highly significant reduction of R. solanacearum incidence by 48%. We can deduce from this that previous research employed high concentrations of biopolymers (chitin and chitosan) on the same plant; however, in our case the quantities used were lower but the results were more significant in terms of increased plant growth and bacterial biocontrol. These beneficial effects are explained by the fact that chitosan induces callose deposition in plants (Luna et al., 2011). Furthermore, chitin oligomers increase the synthesis of the pathogenesis related (PR) proteins (Van Loon et al., 2006) (for example, PR proteins (NPR1) in roots and leaves (PR1 and PR5) (Beatrice et al., 2017)). Chandra et al. (2015) found that chitosan treatment enhances the plant immune response by inducing defense enzyme activity, increasing phenolic contents and maximizing defense-related gene expression. Conclusions In this study, four different concentrations (25, 50, and 100 mg L-1) of chitin, chitosan, and a chitin-chitosan mixture were employed in vitro on R. solanacearum and, subse- quently, they were used preventively and curatively as soil amendments on tomato plants. The results revealed that chitosan concentrations (25, 50, and 100 mg L-1) inhibited the development of R. solanacearum more than other treatments. Furthermore, in vivo experiments revealed that the lowest concentration of chitin (25 mg L-1) allowed for TABLE 4. Means of stem and root length (cm) and leaf alteration index (LAI) of plants treated by chitin, chitosan or chitin-chitosan mixture (25, 50, or 100 mg L-1) and control plants. Treatment (mg L-1) Stem length (cm) Amelioration % Root length (cm) Amelioration % LAI Control 0 36.4 ± 7.1 ab - 29.8 ± 8.0 a - 0.510 ± 0.51 a Chitin 25 56.4 ± 4.7 d 54.95 35.2 ± 5.2 b 18.12 0.254 ± 0.30 b 50 48.0 ± 5.0 c 31.69 37.1 ± 6.1 b 24.50 0.210 ± 0.21 b 100 42.8 ± 4.6 b 17.58 40.2 ± 7.4 b 34.90 0.283 ± 0.12 b Chitosan 25 43.3 ± 6.3 bc 18.96 30.0 ± 4.6 a 00.67 0.264 ± 0.18 b 50 42.1 ± 4.1 b 15.66 26.6 ± 7.2 a 10.78 0.296 ± 0.22 b 100 51.0 ± 5.3 cd 40.11 54.4 ± 6.1 c 82.55 0.235 ± 0.29 b Chitin + Chitosan 25 41.6 ± 6.5 b 14.87 45.1 ± 4.8 bc 51.34 0.343 ± 0.36 b 50 38.0 ± 5.4 a 04.40 34.2 ± 6.7 a 14.76 0.309 ± 0.20 b 100 37.5 ± 5.0 ab 03.02 32.4 ± 7.0 a 08.72 0.335 ± 0.36 b Means in the same column with the same letter do not differ significantly from each other at the 5% significance level according to the Tukey’s test. Pe rc en ta ge o f i m pr ov em en t Concentration (mg L-1) 0 40 30 20 10 50 60 70 80 90 25 50 100 25 50 100 25 50 100 Increase in stem length (%) Increase in root length (%) Chitin Chitosan Chitin+Chitosan FIGURE 4. Stem and root lengths in control plants and plants inoculated with Ralstonia solanacearum, the bacterial wilt agent. 362 Agron. Colomb. 39(3) 2021 excellent stem growth, whereas the same concentration of chitosan contributed significantly to root length increase. The leaf alteration index showed a decrease during the ap- plication of all treatments compared to the control. These findings led us to suggest the use of these biopolymers to manage this ubiquitous disease in matrix crops over the world. Conflict of interest statement The authors declare that there is no conf lict of interest regarding the publication of this article. Author’s contributions AR and KO developed the methodology and created the models. AR conceptualized and wrote the original draft. KO oversaw the writing and editing of the article’s final text and supervised the work. SGG and MS contributed to the data analysis. AR, KO, SGG, and MS wrote, reviewed, and edited the manuscript. Literature cited Adebayo, O. S., & Ekpo, E. J. A. (2005). Biovar of Ralstonia sola- nacearum causing bacterial wilt of tomato in Nigeria. Plant Disease, 89(10), 1129. https://doi.org/10.1094/PD-89-1129C Ahmed, N. N., Islam, M. R., Hossain, M. A., Meah, M. B., & Hossain, M. M. (2013). Determination of races and biovars of Ralstonia solanacearum causing bacterial wilt disease of potato. Journal of Agricultural Science, 5(6), 86–93. https://doi.org/10.5539/ jas.v5n6p86 Algam, S. A. E., Xie, G., Li, B., Yu, S., Su, T., & Larsen, J. (2010). Effects of Paenibacillus strains and chitosan on plant growth promotion and control of Ralstonia wilt in tomato. Journal of Plant Pathology, 92(3), 593–600. Bank, T. L., Kukkadapu, R. K., Madden, A. S., Ginder-Vogel, M. A., Baldwin, M. E., & Jardine, P. M. (2008). Effects of gamma- sterilization on the physico-chemical properties of natural sediments. Chemical Geology, 251(1–4), 1–7. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2008.01.003 Beatrice, C., Linthorst, J. M. H., Cinzia, F., & Luca, R. (2017). Enhancement of PR1 and PR5 gene expressions by chitosan treatment in kiwifruit plants inoculated with Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 148, 163–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-016-1080-x Benhamou, N., & Thériault, G. (1992). Treatment with chitosan enhances resistance of tomato plants to the crown and root rot pathogen Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. radicis-lycopersici. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology, 41(1), 33–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/0885-5765(92)90047-Y Borines, L. M., Sagarino, R. M., Calamba, R. B., Contioso, M. A. A., Jansalin, J. G. F., & Calibo, C. L. (2015). Potential of chitosan for the control of tomato bacterial wilt caused by Ralstonia solanacearum (Smith) Yabuuchi et al. Annals of Tropical Research, 37(2), 57–69. https://doi.org/10.32945/atr3725.2015 Cellier, G. (2010). Description des écotypes du phylotype II dans le complexe d’espèces Ralstonia solanacearum: diversité et évolution [Doctoral dissertation, Université de la Réunion]. HAL Theses. https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00716870 Chamedjeu, R. R., Masanga, J., Matiru, V., & Runo, S. (2018). Isola- tion and characterization of Ralstonia solanacearum strains causing bacterial wilt of potato in Nakuru County of Kenya. African Journal of Biotechnology, 17(52), 1455–1465. https:// doi.org/10.5897/AJB2018.16659 Chandra, S., Chakraborty, N., Dasgupta, A., Sarkar, J., Panda, K., & Acharya, K. (2015). Chitosan nanoparticles: a positive modula- tor of innate immune responses in plants. Scientific Reports, 5, Article 15195. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep15195 Chandrashekara, K. N., Prasanna Kumar, M. K., & Saroja, S. (2012). Aggressiveness of Ralstonia solanacearum isolates on tomato. Journal of Experimental Sciences, 3(9), 5–9. De Mahieu, A., Ponette, Q., Mounir, F., & Lambot, S. (2020). Using GPR to analyze regeneration success of cork oaks in the Maâ- mora forest (Morocco). NDT & E International, 115, Article 102297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2020.102297 Douira, A., & Lahlou, H. (1989). Variabilité de la spécificité para- sitaire chez Verticillium albo-atrum Reinke et Berthold, forme à microsclérotes. Cryptogamie Mycologie, 10, 19–32. Douira, A., Lahlou, H., Elhaloui, N. E., & Bompeix, G. (1994). Mise en évidence de la variabilité du pouvoir pathogène dans la descendance d’une souche de Verticillium albo-atrum, forme à microsclérotes, après son adaptation à une nouvelle plante hôte et retour sur la plante d’origine. Revue de la Faculté des Sciences de Marrakech, (8), 107–118. Elame, F., Lionboui, H., Wifaya, A., Mokrini, F., Mimouni, A., & Azim, K. (2019). Analyse économique de la compétitivité de la filière tomate dans la région du Souss-Massa (Maroc). Revue Marocaine des Sciences Agronomiques et Vétérinaires, 7(4), 595–599. El Ghaouth, A., Arul, J., Ponnampalam, R., & Boulet, M. (1991). Chitosan coating effect on storability and quality of fresh strawberries. Journal of Food Science, 56(6), 1618–1620. https:// doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1991.tb08655.x El Hadrami, A., Adam, L. R., El Hadrami, I., & Daayf, F. (2010). Chitosan in plant protection. Marine Drugs, 8(4), 968–987. https://doi.org/10.3390/md8040968 Elphinstone, J. G. (2005). The current bacterial wilt situation: a global overview. In C. Allen, P. Prior, & A. C. Hayward (Eds.), Bacterial wilt disease and the Ralstonia solanacearum species complex (pp. 9–28). American Phytopathological Society Press. EPPO. (2018). PM 7/21 (2) Ralstonia solanacearum, R. pseudoso- lanacearum and R. syzygii (Ralstonia solanacearum species complex). EPPO Bulletin, 48(1), 32–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/ epp.12454 Farag, S. M. A., Elhalag, K. M. A., Hagag, M. H., Khairy, A. S. M., Ibrahim, H. M., Saker, M. T., & Messiha, N. A. S. (2017). Potato bacterial wilt suppression and plant health improvement after application of different antioxidants. Journal of Phytopathol- ogy, 165(7–8), 522–537. https://doi.org/10.1111/jph.12589 Hassan, O., & Chang, T. (2017). Chitosan for eco-friendly control of plant disease. Asian Journal of Plant Pathology, 11(2), 53–70. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajppaj.2017.53.70 Heikrujam, S. C., Singh, R. I., Laiphrakpam, P. C., & Laishram, S. (2020). Isolation and characterization of Ralstonia sola- nacearum from infected tomato plants of Bishnupur district https://doi.org/10.1094/PD-89-1129C https://doi.org/10.5539/jas.v5n6p86 https://doi.org/10.5539/jas.v5n6p86 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2008.01.003 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2008.01.003 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-016-1080-x https://doi.org/10.1016/0885-5765(92)90047-Y https://doi.org/10.32945/atr3725.2015 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00716870 https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB2018.16659 https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB2018.16659 https://doi.org/10.1038/srep15195 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2020.102297 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1991.tb08655.x https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1991.tb08655.x https://doi.org/10.3390/md8040968 https://doi.org/10.1111/epp.12454 https://doi.org/10.1111/epp.12454 https://doi.org/10.1111/jph.12589 https://doi.org/10.3923/ajppaj.2017.53.70 363Rkhaila, Saga, Ghizlan Grohs, and Ounine: In vitro inhibition attempts and bio-elicitation of Solanum lycopersicum L. by chitin and chitosan against Ralstonia solanacearum, the causal agent of bacterial wilt of Manipur. The Pharma Innovation Journal, 9(2), 138–141. https://doi.org/10.22271/tpi.2020.v9.i2c.4363 Hoekou, Y. P., Batawila, K., Gbogbo, K. A., Karou, D. S., Ameyapoh, Y., & Souza, C. (2012). Evaluation des propriétés antimicro- biennes de quatre plantes de la f lore togolaise utilisées en médecine traditionnelle dans le traitement des diarrhées infantiles. International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences, 6(6), 3089–3097. https://doi.org/10.4314/ijbcs.v6i6.10 Hsu, S. C., & Lockwood, J. L. (1975). Powdered chitin agar as a selective medium for enumeration of actinomycetes in water and soil. Applied Microbiology, 29(3), 422–426. https://doi. org/10.1128/am.29.3.422-426.1975 Kelman, A. (1954). The relationship of pathogenicity in Pseudomonas solanacearum to colony appearance on a tetrazolium medium. Phytopathology, 44, 693–695. Khan, W., Prithiviraj, B., & Smith, D. L. (2003). Chitosan and chitin oligomers increase phenylalanine ammonia-lyase and tyrosine ammonia-lyase activities in soybean leaves. Journal of Plant Physiology, 160(8), 859–863. https://doi. org/10.1078/0176-1617-00905 Kim, G., Dasagrandhi, C., Kang, E. H., Eom, S. H., & Kim, Y. M. (2018). In vitro antibacterial and early stage biofilm inhibitory potential of an edible chitosan and its phenolic conjugates aga inst Pseudomona s aeruginosa a nd Listeria monocy- togenes. 3 Biotech, 8, Article 439. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s13205-018-1451-4 Li, B., Liu, B., Su, T., Fang, Y., Xie, G., Wang, G., Wang, Y., & Sun, G. (2010). Effect of chitosan solution on the inhibition of Pseudomonas f luorescens causing bacterial head rot of broc- coli. The Plant Pathology Journal, 26(2), 189–193. https://doi. org/10.5423/PPJ.2010.26.2.189 Luna, E., Pastor, V., Robert, J., Flors, V., Mauch-Mani, B., & Ton, J. (2011). Callose deposition: a multifaceted plant defense re- sponse. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, 24(2), 183–193. https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-07-10-0149 Malerba, M., & Cerana, R. (2018). Recent advances of chitosan ap- plication in plants. Polymers, 10(2), Article 118. https://doi. org/10.3390/polym10020118 Mansfield, J., Genin, S., Magori, S., Citovsky, V., Sriariyanum, M., Ronald, P., Dow, M., Verdier, V., Beer, S. V., Machado, M. A., Toth, I., Salmond, G., & Foster, G. D. (2012). Top 10 plant pathogenic bacteria in molecular plant pathol- ogy. Molecular Plant Pathology, 13(6), 614–629. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1364-3703.2012.00804.x Mohy Eldin, M. S., Soliman, E. A., Hashem, A. I., & Tamer, T. M. (2008). Chitosan modified membranes for wound dressing ap- plications: preparations, characterization and bio-evaluation. Trends in Biomaterials and Artificial Organs, 22(3), 158–168. Poussier, S., Trigalet-Demery, D., Vandewalle, P., Goffinet, B., Lu- isetti, J., & Trigalet, A. (2000). Genetic diversity of Ralstonia solanacearum as assessed by PCR-RFLP of the hrp gene region, AFLP and 16S rRNA sequence analysis, and identification of an African subdivision. Microbiology, 146(7), 1679–1692. https:// doi.org/10.1099/00221287-146-7-1679 Rahman, M. F., Islam, M. R., Rahman, T., & Meah, M. B. (2010). Bio- chemical characterization of Ralstonia solanacerum causing bacterial wilt of brinjal in Bangladesh. Progressive Agriculture, 21(1–2), 9–19. https://doi.org/10.3329/pa.v21i1-2.16744 Ramkissoon, A., Francis, J., Bowrin, V., Ramjegathesh, R., Ramsub- hag, A., & Jayaraman, J. (2016). Bio‐efficacy of a chitosan based elicitor on Alternaria solani and Xanthomonas vesicatoria infections in tomato under tropical conditions. Annals of Ap- plied Biology, 169(2), 274–283. https://doi.org/10.1111/aab.12299 Ravelomanantsoa, S., Vernière, C., Rieux, A., Costet, L., Chiroleu, F., Arribat, S., Cellier, G., Pruvost, O., Poussier, S., Robène, I., Guérin, F., & Prior, P. (2018). Molecular epidemiology of bacte- rial wilt in the Madagascar highlands caused by Andean (Phy- lotype IIB-1) and African (Phylotype III) brown rot strains of the Ralstonia solanacearum species complex. Frontiers in Plant Science, 8, Article 2258. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.02258 Razia, S., Chowdhury, M. S. M., Aminuzzaman, F. M., Sultana, N., & Islam, M. (2021). Morphological, pathological, biochemical and molecular characterization of Ralstonia solanacearum isolates in Bangladesh. American Journal of Molecular Biology, 11(4), 142–164. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajmb.2021.114012 Rkhaila, A., & Ounine, K. (2018). Shrimp shells, chitin and chito- san powders effect on growth of Lycopersicon esculentum and their ability to induce resistance against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. radicis-lycopersici attack. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, 52(5), 512–517. https://doi.org/10.18805/IJARe.A-305 Rodrigues, L. M. R., Destéfano, S. A. L., Diniz, M. C. T., Comparoni, R., & Neto, J. R. (2011). Pathogenicity of Brazilian strains of Ralstonia solanacearum in Strelitzia reginae seedlings. Tropi- cal Plant Pathology, 36(6), 409–413. https://doi.org/10.1590/ S1982-56762011000600011 Sadi, S. M., Saidou, A. K., Boube, M., & Aune, J. B. (2020). Effets de la fertilisation à base de la biomasse du Sida cordifolia L. sur les performances agronomiques et la rentabilité économique de la tomate (Lycopersicum esculentum Mill.) en culture irri- guée. European Scientific Journal, 16(3), 127–150. https://doi. org/10.19044/esj.2020.v16n3p127 Schaad, N. W., Jones, J. B., & Chun, W. (Eds.). (2001). Laboratory guide for identification of plant pathogenic bacteria (3rd ed.). American Phytopathological Society Press. Sikirou, R., Beed, F., Ezin, V., Hoteigni, J., & Miller, S. A. (2017). Distribution, pathological and biochemical characterization of Ralstonia solanacearum in Benin. Annals of Agricultural Sci- ences, 62(1), 83–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aoas.2017.05.003 Siri, M. I., Sanabria, A., & Pianzzola, M. J. (2011). Genetic diversity and aggressiveness of Ralstonia solanacearum strains caus- ing bacterial wilt of potato in Uruguay. Plant Disease, 95(10), 1292–1301. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-09-10-0626 Ting, S., Guiyue, W., & Guanlin, X. (2013). Effects of chitosan against Ralstonia solanacearum and its biofilm formation. Plant Pro- tection, 39(1), 89–92. Van Loon, L. C., Rep, M., & Pieterse, C. M. J. (2006). Significance of inducible defense-related proteins in infected plants. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 44, 135–162. https://doi.org/10.1146/ annurev.phyto.44.070505.143425 Yuliar, Nion, Y. A., & Toyota, K. (2015). Recent trends in control methods for bacterial wilt diseases caused by Ralstonia sola- nacearum. Microbes and Environments, 30(1), 1–11. https:// doi.org/10.1264/jsme2.ME14144 https://doi.org/10.22271/tpi.2020.v9.i2c.4363 https://doi.org/10.4314/ijbcs.v6i6.10 https://doi.org/10.1128/am.29.3.422-426.1975 https://doi.org/10.1128/am.29.3.422-426.1975 https://doi.org/10.1078/0176-1617-00905 https://doi.org/10.1078/0176-1617-00905 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-018-1451-4 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-018-1451-4 https://doi.org/10.5423/PPJ.2010.26.2.189 https://doi.org/10.5423/PPJ.2010.26.2.189 https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-07-10-0149 https://doi.org/10.3390/polym10020118 https://doi.org/10.3390/polym10020118 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1364-3703.2012.00804.x https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1364-3703.2012.00804.x https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-146-7-1679 https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-146-7-1679 https://doi.org/10.3329/pa.v21i1-2.16744 https://doi.org/10.1111/aab.12299 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.02258 https://doi.org/10.4236/ajmb.2021.114012 https://doi.org/10.18805/IJARe.A-305 https://doi.org/10.1590/S1982-56762011000600011 https://doi.org/10.1590/S1982-56762011000600011 https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2020.v16n3p127 https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2020.v16n3p127 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aoas.2017.05.003 https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-09-10-0626 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.phyto.44.070505.143425 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.phyto.44.070505.143425 https://doi.org/10.1264/jsme2.ME14144 https://doi.org/10.1264/jsme2.ME14144