TEMPLATE FOR ACADEMICA SCIENCE JOURNAL


JOURNAL OF AL-QADISIYAH FOR 
ENGINEERING SCIENCE  

 
Vol. 11, No. 2  

ISSN: 1998-4456 

 

Page 153 Copyright  2018 Al-Qadisiyah Journal For Enginnering Science. All rights reserved. 

 

 

EFFECT OF DIE ANGLE AND FRICTION COEFFICIENT ON 
TEMPERATURE AND STRESS DISTRIBUTION IN THE EXTRUSION 

PROCESS   

 

Dr. Hazim Ismael Radhi 

Thi – Qar University – Engineering College - Mechanical  Department 

E-mail- Hazemismaeel2003@gmail.com 

Dr. Lattif Shekher Jabur 

Southern Technical University - Technical Institute of Nasiriyah - Mechanical Technics Department 

E-mail- lsh58@stu.edu.iq 

 

Abstract: : Extrusion, among other types,  is one of the most important forming processes 
due to its high productivity, lower cost and its good ability to improve the physical and 
mechanical properties of extruded materials. FE simulation was carried out on ABAQUS 
software ver.6.9. to study the distribution of stress and temperature which created through 
the extrusion process. The results of present study are accentuated that, there is a 
complicated relationship between stress and temperature distribution relative to die angle 
and friction coefficient. It was found, in the range of tested cases, at friction coefficient of 
more than ( 0.08 ), for ( 45o ) die angle, the maximum value of temperature is twice higher 
than that of ( 75o ), hence the die angle has more significant effect on state of stress and 
temperature than that of friction coefficient. Nevertheless,  a high die angle ( α = 75o ) 
emerged low value of maximum temperature due to easily flow of material toward the die 
orifice. Furthermore, there are a gradual increasing of vonMises criterion and temperature 
with increasing the friction coefficient while they are decreasing with increasing the die 
angle.  

Keywords: stress and temperature distribution, die angle, friction coefficient, deformation.  

INTRODUCTION 

Aluminum and its alloys are extensively used in different forming process to produce long, strong pieces of 
formed metal from one solid piece. As well as extrusion of aluminum alloys offers a relatively cheap method of 
producing complex shapes with high geometric tolerance [1]. Tiernam P. et al. [2] used finite element analysis 
to evaluate the influence of reduction ratio, die land height and die angle on the extraction force during  cold 
extrusion of high grade ( AA 1100 ) aluminum. They presented, the largest extrusion force obtained when the 
die angle, die exit diameter and die land are ( 15o, 5mm, 4mm ) respectively. Evan W. Albert et al. [3] studied 
direct extrusion of aluminum wire by FE analysis to mitigate manufacturing defects. They concluded,the 
increasing the ram velocity leads to decrease both of turbulence and stress irregularities because of time 
decreasing in which the die surface and billet are in contact. 

By using port hole die method, the effect of convex die angle that would optimize the strength and a load of 
hot extrusion process of ( A 16061) alloy of aluminum tube, have been investigated by Sangamesh Sirsgi et al. 
[4]. The authors were reported, with the numerical analysis of the process, the maximum stress is created on 
the corners of square tube. Also, finite element simulation employed to study the distribution of strain, 

mailto:Hazemismaeel2003@gmail.com
mailto:lsh58@stu.edu.iq


JOURNAL OF AL-QADISIYAH FOR 
ENGINEERING SCIENCE  

 
Vol. 11, No. 2  

ISSN: 1998-4456 

 

Page 154 Copyright  2018 Al-Qadisiyah Journal For Enginnering Science. All rights reserved. 

 

temperature and effective stress of direct extrusion of titanium alloy [5]. They investigated the influence of 
different design and process parameters on maximum ram speed, applied pressure and strain and stress 
distribution. Adeosun S. O. [6] studied mechanical properties response of extruded aluminum ( 6063 )  alloy by 
using plain carbon and tool steel dies at different die entry angles. They employed finite element analysis to 
investigate the effect of die angle on maximum extrusion pressure and hardness of extrudate. They reported 
that, by taken into account the cost of manufacturing  process, plain carbon steel can successfully replace tool 
steel as a die material without losing the desirable products. And the maximum extrusion pressure and the 
hardness of extruded parts are increased as the die entry angle increased. Tool steel and mild steel dies used 
to study the extrusion characteristic of cold, hot and annealed billets of wrought aluminum alloy [1]. Die angles 
ranging from (15o to 90o) adopted to measure the extrusion pressure, linear strain, extrusion ratio and surface 
hardness of extrusion products. The authors concluded, cold extrusion was easier at high die angles than that 
at lower die angles and the highest linear strain was obtained for cold extrusion billets by using tool steel die 
with (90o) die angle. Also, the results revealed that the tool steel dies achieved superior extrusion response 
relative to die which made of mild steel.Rafid Jabbar Mohammed [7] utilized commercial finite element code 
Deform – 3D to investigat the type of metal flow and stress distribution of ( Al – 1100 ) rod extrusion.The 
author reported, the finite element model was successfully simulating the stress distribution in direct rod 
extrusion. He found, the optimum die angle reduces the magnitude of normal, shear and effective stresses.  

In this present study, FEM was employed to investigate the distribution of stress and temperature which 
created during direct extrusion of commercial aluminum for different values of die angle and friction coefficient. 
Finite element simulation was carried out on ABAQUS software V. 6.9 [8]. 

1. MATERIALS AND FINITE ELEMENT MODEL 

The billet materials is aluminum alloy which its mechanical and thermal properties are listed in Table (1) [9]. 
Figure (1) indicates the FE model of the extrusion process. The analysis is adopted on consideration of 
coupled temperature displacement condition. The diameter and the length of the billet are ( Do = 60 mm,        
Lo = 180 mm ) respectively. The billet goes through a die with an opening diameter of ( Di = 40 mm ), it means, 
the extrusion ratio is ( 2.25, where extrusion ratio = Do2 /Di2 ).Three values of die angle ( α = 45o , 60o and 75o )  
and ten values of friction coefficient ( μ ) from ( 0.01 to 0.1; with 0.01 for each step ) are used to study their 
effect on stress and temperature distribution which generated during the extrusion process. 

The use of computing software in the simulations of metal forming process, such as extrusion, rolling and 
drawing, is the most logical approach to achieve the reducing of unnecessary consumption of resources as 
time, energy and scrap material [3]. FE simulation of this study was carried out on ABAQUS V.6.9. CAX4T 
elements are used to mesh the billet which is considered as deformable part while the container defined as 
rigid surfaces. CAX4T is a 4 - nodes axisymmetric thermally coupled quadrilateral, and 2D meshes of both 
billet and container are created [5,8,10].The extrusion process is displacement controlled so that 
corresponding displacement is applied on the top of the billet. 

Table 1: Mechanical and thermal properties of Aluminum billet [9] 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

properties The values 

Density 2700 Kg / m3 

Young's Modulus 69 x 103 MPa 

Poisson's ratio 0.33 

Conductivity 204  at 0oC w /m.k 
225  at 300 oC  w /m.k 

Inelastic heat fraction 
0.9 

Specific heat 880  J/ kg k 

Expansion coefficient 8.42 x 10-5 1/k 



JOURNAL OF AL-QADISIYAH FOR 
ENGINEERING SCIENCE  

 
Vol. 11, No. 2  

ISSN: 1998-4456 

 

Page 155 Copyright  2018 Al-Qadisiyah Journal For Enginnering Science. All rights reserved. 

 

 

Figure 1 : Dimension of Finite Element Simulation model 

2. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 

2.1. STRESS DISTRIBUTION 

Figure ( 2 ) illustrates the location of maximum vonMises stress ( SVM ) at a different stage of extrusion process 
at friction coefficient equal ( μ = 0.05  ) and die angle ( α = 60o ). It is clear that when the billet reaches the first 
bend in the container, the value of maximum vonMises stress is small ( 131.9 MPa ) because ( at this region ) 
the billet material starts deforming plastically. Then it increases gradually throughout the flow of the billet's 
material to the die outlet. The maximum value of vonMises stress (251.1 MPa ) occurs at the end of extrusion 
stage when the extrusion products go out of the die orifice. A similar trend was found with different values of 
friction coefficient and die angle, and also with the distribution of shear stress ( S12 ) as shown in figures ( 3 ).  

 

b 

 

a 

 

d  

 

c 
 
Figure 2: Location of maximum vonMises stresses ( SVM  ) at different stage of extrusion   
                 process for friction coefficient, μ = 0.05 and die angle = 60o.    



JOURNAL OF AL-QADISIYAH FOR 
ENGINEERING SCIENCE  

 
Vol. 11, No. 2  

ISSN: 1998-4456 

 

Page 156 Copyright  2018 Al-Qadisiyah Journal For Enginnering Science. All rights reserved. 

 

 

b 

a 

 

d 

 

 

c 

 

Figure  3  : Location of maximum shear stress ( S12
 ) at different stage of extrusion process for 

                  friction coefficient, μ = 0.05 and die angle = 60o.                

                              

The change in the state of principle stress ( S22 ) and plastic strain ( PE22 ) for die angle ( α = 60o ) and friction 
coefficient ( μ = 0.05 ) during the extrusion process can be obviously seen in figures ( 4 & 5 ). From figure (4), 
it is clear that when the billet material flows throughout the die, the material in the corners of container and die 
was under compressive stress. Also, it can be noticed, the maximum principle stress (  S22 ) which is tensile 
stress localizes in the surface areas of the extrudate, whilst the compressive stress exists in the core of 
extruded parts. Figure (5) reveals the changes that have taken place in plastic strain ( PE22 ) through the 
extrusion process.  

  
 
Figure 4: Distribution of principle stress(S22) of 
               extrusion process for die angle = 60o 
               and friction coefficient, μ = 0.05. 

 
Figure 5 : Distribution of plastic strain ( PE22 ) of 
                extrusion process for die angle = 60o 
                and friction coefficient, μ = 0.05. 



JOURNAL OF AL-QADISIYAH FOR 
ENGINEERING SCIENCE  

 
Vol. 11, No. 2  

ISSN: 1998-4456 

 

Page 157 Copyright  2018 Al-Qadisiyah Journal For Enginnering Science. All rights reserved. 

 

2.1.1. EFFECT OF FRICTION COEFFICIENT ON STRESS DISTRIBUTION 

 

The variation of maximum vonMises stress with friction coefficient for different die angles are shown in figure   
(6). It is obvious that the increasing of friction coefficient leads to increase the value of maximum vonMises 
stress. Also, it can be seen, there is a significant effect of die angle in such manner; the bigger the die angle, 
the less value of maximum vonMises stress is. This can be attributed to the bigger die angle achieve more 
easily flow of billet material through the die, leading to  a decrease in the extrusion force that needed to press 
the billet to go through the die outlet. 

 

 

 

Figure 6: The variation of vonMises stress ( SVM )    
verse friction coefficient for different die angles. 

 

In addition to another parameter that affects on stress and strain state during extrusion process,the frictional 
condition at the billet – container and billet – die contributes strongly in determining the characteristics of 
stresses and plastic strain that exist in extruded products. Figures ( 7, 8 and 9 ) demonstrates the variation of 
vonMises ( SVM ), principle ( S22 ) and shear ( S12 ) stresses with friction coefficient for ( 60o ) die angles. It is 
evident that the increasing of friction coefficient leads to increase the maximum values of all stresses. The 
results accentuated that the maximum values of SVM, S22 and S12 are ( 265 MPa, 158.8 MPa and 75.98 MPa ) 
respectively, and for tested cases, these results attained at maximum value of friction coefficient which is 
equal to ( 0.1 ). These results mean, as the coefficient of friction increases, larger frictional forces is, so larger 
extrusion force is needed to overcome this force which resists the material's flow through the container and 
die. Then consequently, higher stresses exist during the extrusion process with a high value of friction 
coefficient.  

 

 

 

 

 

 



JOURNAL OF AL-QADISIYAH FOR 
ENGINEERING SCIENCE  

 
Vol. 11, No. 2  

ISSN: 1998-4456 

 

Page 158 Copyright  2018 Al-Qadisiyah Journal For Enginnering Science. All rights reserved. 

 

 

a 

 

b 
c 

 

d 

 

e 

 

f 
 
Figure 7 : Effect of friction coefficient on vonMises stress ( SVM ) for 60

o die angle ; a- μ= 0.00, 
                b- μ=0.02, c- μ = 0.04, d – μ =0.06, e- μ=0.08  and f- μ = 0.1. 

 

  

a 

 

b 

 

c 

 

d 

 

e 

 

f 

 
Figure 8 : Effect of friction coefficient on principle stress ( S 22 ) for 60

o die angle ; a- μ= 0.00,  
                 b- μ =0.02, c- μ = 0.04, d – μ =0.06, e- μ=0.08  and f- μ = 0.1. 
 



JOURNAL OF AL-QADISIYAH FOR 
ENGINEERING SCIENCE  

 
Vol. 11, No. 2  

ISSN: 1998-4456 

 

Page 159 Copyright  2018 Al-Qadisiyah Journal For Enginnering Science. All rights reserved. 

 

2.1.2. EFFECT OF DIE ANGLE ON STRESS DISTRIBUTION 

Die angle has a direct effect on the level of maximum stresses and strains of extrusion process. The variation 
of maximum values of ( SVM , S22 , S12 ) for different die angles and friction coefficient are shown in figures       
( 10, 11 and 12 ). The results were exhibited that the maximum values of stress, strain and contact pressures 
for ( α = 75o ) die angle are lower than those for ( α = 45o ). It means, the bigger the die angle, the lower values 
of maximum stress are. This can be attributed to the fact, the bigger die angle achieves more easily flow of the 
billet's material throughout the die, hence decreasing the extrusion forces that needed to press the billet to go 
toward the die outlet and consequently fewer values of maximum stresses and strains. These results are 
consistent with result have been found by Adeosun S. O. et al.[1]. 

 

 

a 

 

b 

 

c 

 
Figure 10 : Effect of die angles on VonMises stress ( SVM ) for coefficient of friction μ =  0.06 ; 
                  a- α = 45o , b- α = 60o, c- α = 75o. 

 

a 

 

b 

 

c 

 

d 

 

e 

 

f 

 
 

Figure 9: Effect of coefficient of friction on shear stress ( S12 ) for 60
o die angle ;  a- μ= 0.00,  

               b- μ=0.02, c- μ = 0.04, d – μ =0.06, e- μ=0.08  and f- μ = 0.1 



JOURNAL OF AL-QADISIYAH FOR 
ENGINEERING SCIENCE  

 
Vol. 11, No. 2  

ISSN: 1998-4456 

 

Page 160 Copyright  2018 Al-Qadisiyah Journal For Enginnering Science. All rights reserved. 

 

 

 

a 

 

b 

 

c 

 
 
Figure 11 : Effect of die angles on principle  stress ( S 22 ) for friction  coefficient μ =  0.06 ;  a- α = 45

o , 
                  b- α = 60o, c- α = 75o. 
 
 

 

a 

 

b 

 

c 
 
Figure 12 : Effect of die angles on shear  stress ( S 12 ) for friction coefficient μ =  0.06 ;  a- α = 45

o , 
                  b- α = 60o, c- α = 75o. 
 

2.2. Temperature distribution 

 

The relationship between the maximum temperature and friction coefficient for different die angle is shown in 
figure (13). It is evident that the increasing of friction coefficient leads to increase the value of maximum 
temperature.The temperature distribution and location of maximum values of ( 60o ) die angle for different 
friction coefficient are illustrated in figure ( 14 ). It is clear that the maximum temperature exists on the surface 
of extrudate part in the region when the material enters toward the die, it is in the interfacial contact surface 
between the material and wall of the die.  

 

 



JOURNAL OF AL-QADISIYAH FOR 
ENGINEERING SCIENCE  

 
Vol. 11, No. 2  

ISSN: 1998-4456 

 

Page 161 Copyright  2018 Al-Qadisiyah Journal For Enginnering Science. All rights reserved. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 

a b 
 
Figure 14 : Temperature distribution and location of maximum values for  60o  die angle and  
                   friction coefficient of  ; a - μ = 0.02 , b - μ = 0.06. 
 

2. 2.1. Effect of friction coefficient on temperature distribution 

The variation of maximum temperature, which generates during the extrusion process for ( α = 60o ) with 
different values of friction coefficient, is shown in figures 13 and 15. There is a gradual increasing in maximum 
value of temperature with increasing the friction coefficient. The maximum temperature for  (α = 60o ) at 
frictionless condition is ( 62.77 oC ) and it increases to ( 80.53 oC ) at ( μ = 0.1 ), it means, the the difference 
percentage is ( 22% ) while for (α = 45o ) and (α = 75o ) are ( 34% and 7.6% ) respectively. These results prove 
that, the friction coefficient at the interfacial surface between the billet's material and the walls of both 
container and die, has a significant effect on the level of maximum temperature which created through the 
extrusion process. This can be explained as; when the friction  coefficient increases, more friction force exist 
between the contact surfaces and it will produce more heat. Hence the maximum value of material's 
temperature which exists inside the die will also increase. These results are consistent with results that have 
been found by Salode A. M. [11]. 

Figure 13 :The releationship between maximum 
temperature and coefficient of  friction for  
different die angles. 
 



JOURNAL OF AL-QADISIYAH FOR 
ENGINEERING SCIENCE  

 
Vol. 11, No. 2  

ISSN: 1998-4456 

 

Page 162 Copyright  2018 Al-Qadisiyah Journal For Enginnering Science. All rights reserved. 

 

 

a 

 

b 
 c 

 

d 

 

e 

 

f 

Figure 15 : Effect of friction coefficient o on Temperature ( NTII ) for 60o die angle  a- μ= 0.0,  
                  b- μ=0.02, c- μ = 0.04, d – μ =0.06, e- μ=0.08  and f- μ = 0.1 

On another hand, and despite the fact of, materials deform easily at high temperature due to the softening 
effect, nevertheless the high level temperature which created through the extrusion process, is undesirable 
because of the intensity of dead metal zone formation will increases. Also, a high temperature affects the 
elastic and plastic properties of the billet and die material, resulting in increasing the level of plastic 
deformation of extruded material and/or increasing the deflection of the die [11]. 

2.2.2. EFFECT OF DIE ANGLE ON TEMPERATURE DISTRIBUTION 

The effect of die angle on the maximum value of extruded parts' temperature is shown in figures ( 16 and 17 ). 
There is a reverse relationship between the die angle and maximum temperature. In the range of tested cases 
of friction coefficient, the maximum temperature for   ( α = 45o ) is higher than that for ( α = 75o ), and for           

( μ > 0.08 ) it is more than twice higher. They are ( 106.2 oC, 76.86 oC, 51.74 oC ) at ( μ = 0.08 ) for die angles 
of ( 45o, 60o and 75o ) respectively. The results are revealed that the maximum temperature is substantially 
influenced by the die angle in such a manner; a low die angle leads to difficult flow of material throughout the 
containeranddietowardthedieoutlet,resultingwithincreasing  in the friction at billet – container and billet – die 
interfaces, which caused large amount of heat generation, consequently increasing the process temperature. 

 

 

a 

 

b 

 

c 
 
Figure 16 : Effect of die angles on temperature ( NTII ) for coefficient of friction μ =  0.02 ;  a- α = 45o, 
                  b- α = 60o, c- α = 75o. 

 



JOURNAL OF AL-QADISIYAH FOR 
ENGINEERING SCIENCE  

 
Vol. 11, No. 2  

ISSN: 1998-4456 

 

Page 163 Copyright  2018 Al-Qadisiyah Journal For Enginnering Science. All rights reserved. 

 

 

a 

 

b 

 

c 

 
 
Figure 17 : Effect of die angles on temperature ( NTII ) for friction coefficient μ =  0.06 ; 
                  a- α = 45o , b- α = 60o, c- α = 75o. 

 

VI. Conclusion 

The influence of stress and temperature distribution by die angle and friction coefficient have been 
investigated using finite element analysis. The die angle has a significient effect on temperature distribution of 
billet ( i.e. high die angle will decrease the temperature distribution and vice versa ). Furtheremore, the finite 
element simulation of process was illustrated that, the maximum values of vonMises stress and temperature 
are attain at die angle of ( 45o ) and friction coefficient of ( 0.1 ). 

 

REFERENCES 

  

1. Adeosun S. O., Akpan E. I. and Gbenebor O. P. " Extrusion Characteristics Dependence of wrought 

Aluminium Alloy on Extrusion Variables ", American Journal of Materials Science, 2013, volume 3, Issue 4, 

pp. 77 – 83. 

2. Tiernam P., Hillery M. T., Draganescu B. and M. Gheorghe, " Modelling of Cold Extrusion with 

Experimental Verification", Journal of Materials Processing Technology ", 168, 2005, pp. 360 – 366. 

3. Evan W. Albert, Adam T. Barret and Timothy F. Gallant," Study of Direct Aluminum Wire Extrusion by 

Finite Element Analysis to Mitigate Manufacturing Defects", ME 259 – Computational Solid Mechanics, 

Final Project Report, May 7 , 2015, pp: 1 – 14 . 

4. Sangamesh Sirsgi, Dr. Shrishail Kakkeri and Nagraji Patil, “ Extrusion Process and  Parameters 

Involved in Experimental and Numerical Investigation Review “, International Journal of Engineering 

Research and Development, Volume 11, Issu 06, June 2015, pp. 01 – 03 

5. Maziar Ramezani and Thomas Neitzeert," Finite Element Modelling of hot Extrusion of  Ti – 6AL – 4V alloy 

", International Journal of Advanced Engineering Research and Science ( IJAERS ), Volume 3, Issue – 6 , 

June 2016, ISSN 2349 – 6495, pp. 45 – 51. 

6. Adeosun S. O., Sekunowo O. I.  and Gbenebor O. P.  " Effect of Die Entry angle on Extrusion Responses 

of Aluminium 6063 alloy ", International Journal of Engineering and Technology ( IJET ), Volume 4, No. 2, 

February 2014, ISSN 2049 – 3444, pp. 127 – 134, publications UK. 

 7. Rafid Jabbar Mohammed," Effect of Die angle on Stress distribution in Extrusion Process of  Aluminium 

Rod ", Basrah Journal for Engineering Sciences, Volume 14, No. 2, 2014, pp. 43 – 50.  



JOURNAL OF AL-QADISIYAH FOR 
ENGINEERING SCIENCE  

 
Vol. 11, No. 2  

ISSN: 1998-4456 

 

Page 164 Copyright  2018 Al-Qadisiyah Journal For Enginnering Science. All rights reserved. 

 

8. ABAQUS CAE ver. 6.9, 2009, Example problems Manual; standard User's Manual. 

9. El Amri Abdelouahid and Mounir El Yakhloufi haddou, " Explicit coupled thermo-mechanical finite 

element of Aluminum Alloys ", International Journal of Recent Advanced in Mechanical Engineering 

(IJMECH) Volume 4, No. 3, August 2015. 

10. Maziar Ramezani and Thomas Neitzer,“ Computer Simulations of Direct Extrusion of Sintered Ti – 6 Al – 

4 V alloy at Elevated Temperature ", International Journal of Applied Engineering Research ", ISSN 0973 – 

4562, Volume 11, Number 6, 2016, pp: 3848 – 3852. 

11. Saloda Murtaza Ali," To Study the Influence of Frictional Conditions and Die Land Length on Component 

Error and Die Deflection in Cold Extrusion by Finite Element Analysis, "Metallurgcal Engineering ( ME ), 

volume 3, Issue 1, January 2013, No. 1, pp. 29 – 38.