Article AL-QADISIYAH JOURNAL FOR ENGINEERING SCIENCES 13 (2020) 274–283 Contents lists available at http://qu.edu.iq Al-Qadisiyah Journal for Engineering Sciences Journal homepage: http://qu.edu.iq/journaleng/index.php/JQES * Corresponding author. E-mail address: s.ali1101@coeng.uobaghdad.edu.iq( Sahar H. Ali ) https://doi.org/10.30772/qjes.v13i4.681 2411-7773/© 2020 University of Al-Qadisiyah. All rights reserved. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Improving the Moisture Damage Resistance of HMA by Using Ceramic Fiber and Hydrated Lime Sahar Hussein Ali a* , Mohammed Qadir Ismael a a University of Baghdad / Civil Engineering Department, Baghdad, Iraq A R T I C L E I N F O Article history: Received 19 August 2020 Received in revised form 25 September 2020 Accepted 25 September 2020 Keywords: Moisture Susceptibility Ceramic Fibers Hydrated Lime Tensile Strength Ratio Index of Retained Strength A B S T R A C T The Moisture damage is considered as one of the main challenge for the experts in the field of asphalt pavement design. The aims of the present study is to modify moisture resistance of the asphalt concrete by utilizing ceramic fibers as a type of reinforcement incorporated with hydrated lime. For this purpose, a penetration grade of the asphalt cement (40-50) was utilized as a binder with an aggregate of the maximum nominal size of 12.5mm and mineral filler limestone dust. A series of specimens has been fabricated by utilizing 0.50, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 percentages from the weight of total mixture of ceramic fibers. For each of these contents, another subsequent group of specimens with hydrated lime with 0.0, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 percentages from the total weight of aggregate were molded. For the addition of ceramic fiber and hydrated lime to the mixtures, the dry method for ceramic fiber was adopted. While for the hydrated lime, the saturated surface dry method was adopted. The results of this study have shown that the addition of 1% ceramic fiber from the total weight of the asphalt mixture with 1.5% hydrated lime recorded the highest levels of increase. Furthermore, the outputs of the tests used in this study have shown that the use of ceramic fibers resulted in an increase in the value of tensile strength ratio (TSR) and in the index of retained strength (IRS) compared with the control mixture. Maximum values for TSR were achieved at 1% ceramic fibers with 1.5 % hydrated lime. Maximum values for TSR were achieved at 1% ceramic fibers with 1.5 % hydrated lime. © 2020 University of Al-Qadisiyah. All rights reserved. 1. INTRODUCTION Moisture damage is one of the main reasons for the early failure in the asphalt concrete mixtures. A correct assessment of the moisture susceptibility is necessary to prevent the deterioration of the field mixtures Adriana et al. [1]. The moisture damage as distresses that influence the community in various ways can be considered. Economically, the maintenance and rehabilitation of the damaged pavements that are resulted from the moisture damage cost millions of dollars [2 –3]. Besides, susceptibility due to moisture is a major concern in asphalt pavements; it can be considered as a deterioration within the mechanical property of the asphalt because of the impact of moisture or water that causes severe distresses. The asphalt mixture's resistance to the moisture damage is highly critical for its long-term performance. If the asphalt mixture is susceptible to the moisture damage, it could, in the end, fail in any of the http://qu.edu.iq/ https://doi.org/10.30772/qjes.v13i http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ SAHAR HUSSEIN ALI , MOHAMMED QADIR ISMAEL /AL-QADISIYAH JOURNAL FOR ENGINEERING SCIENCES 13 (2020) 274–283 275 failure modes, i.e. rutting, fatigue, thermal cracking, or ravelling Sebaaly et al. [4]. Moisture damage in asphalt pavement can lead to several distresses inside asphalt structures such as bleeding, cracking, rutting, ravelling and localized failures which are similar to distress resulting from some other factors such as materials, design, and construction. It is then necessary to differentiate between distresses resulting from moisture or those resulting from the effect of other factors and to consider this as the first step is in selecting the proper solution Hicks et al. [5]. Because of the growing cost of repairing and renewing damaged pavements, extended studies have been carried out to the resistance against damages and to the growing of their service-life Arabani et al. [6]. Many studies have inspected the use of fibre to get better the performance of HMA: some focused on specific performance concerning water effects, environment, and temperature Xu et al. [7]. At the same time, other experiments were conducted to highlight the mechanical performance of HMA, e.g. fatigue, rutting, and stiffness Moreno-Navarro et al. [8]. Different kinds of the modifier fibres like cellulose, polyester, glass, and mineral fibres are widely used into dissimilar types of asphalt mixtures Wan et al. [9]. The influence of reinforcement of the fiber is improved by various means of improving its quantity into a definite value, relying on the kind and length of the fibres Wu et al. [10]. Ceramic fiber has an extensive application value in everyday life and it forms a whole industry as a substance for heat insulation. The main chemical composition of the ceramic fiber is Al2O3 and SiO2. At the same time, depending on the various purposes, some other chemical substances are added to it to improve its properties. The ceramic fiber diameter ranges from 2 to 5 µm, and the length is nearly 20 mm. Its advantages involve being of lightweight, having thermal insulation, no toxicity, resistance to mechanical vibration, and is of low cost compared with other fibers. Ceramic fiber can improve the rendition of the asphalt mixtures because it has a high stability to temperature and chemical changes, appropriate flexibility, and adequate shock resistance. The reinforcing properties of these fibers along with their low deleterious influences and easy-accessibility can make them suitable additives to improve the characteristics of the binder and the asphalt mixture Wan et al. [9]. Anti-stripping agents are categorized into two sets: the first includes those added to the asphalt binder which are usually chemical liquids called "Liquid Anti stripping Agents" while the second set includes those attached directly to the aggregate like fly ash, lime, Portland cement, flue dust, polymers, cement Klein, and numerous others, Epps et al. [11]. The main goal of adding anti-stripping agents is to reduce the moisture sensitivity of the asphalt mixtures by improving the bond between the asphalt binder and the aggregate. Lime has been widely utilized as both a filler and additive to resist moisture in asphalt mixtures Ismael et al. [12]. Three major forms of lime are used with asphalt mixtures according to Hunter et al. [13]; hydrated lime (Ca(OH)2), quicklime (CaO), and dolomitic lime (CaO.MgO). The increase in road traffic with inadequate and the repeated with less the maintenance exacerbated the deterioration of asphalt pavements, during the past 20 years in Iraq. The major structural distress that led to a reduction in the serviceability of asphalt pavements are cracking and rutting. Therefore, different types of additives and modifiers are utilized in asphalt to decrease the distresses effect Hunter et al. [14]. The objective of that research is to study the application of one of the most widely utilized fibres in the insulation manufacture in the asphalt mixtures. The significance of the present study is to use ceramic fibre as suitable and cost-effective additives to excess the service-life of the asphalt pavements, which could promote more types of researches in the future. In this study, hydrated lime was used as anti-stripping with the ceramic fibres as reinforcement fibres for the asphalt mixture. 2. EXPERIMENTAL WORK 2.1. Materials The materials utilized in this research are locally obtainable and are now used in road constructions in Iraq. Ceramic fiber and hydrated lime are available in the local market. All materials were obtained from commercial sources without trying to get private products. Therefore, this research investigates the use of the ceramic fibers as reinforcement fibers for improving their resistance to the moisture damage in the asphalt mixtures. 2.1.1. Asphalt Cement (AC) One kind of AC with a penetration grade of (40-50) and produced by Al–Daurah Refinery was used here. The physical properties of asphalt cement utilized in this study are shown in Table 1. The test results were to meet the State Commission of Roads and Bridge (SCRB) [15] specifications. 2.1.2. Coarse Aggregate The crushed coarse aggregate of about between the sieve size (19mm) and sieve (4.75 mm) has been gained from the Al-Nibaee Quarry; it accords to the (SCRB) [15] specifications. specifications. The physical property of the coarse aggregate is shown in Table 2. 2.1.3. Fine Aggregate The crushed fine aggregate of about between the sieve size (4.75 mm) and sieve size (0.075 mm) has been gained from the same source of coarse aggregate. It consists of tough, hard, grains, free of the injurious amount of clay, loam, or other harmful substances. The physical property of the fine aggregate is shown in Table 3. 2.1.4. Mineral Filler The substance passage from sieve size (0.075mm) is called the mineral filler. It must be dry and free of the accumulation of accurate particles. The filler material used in making asphalt mixture is the limestone dust because of its availability and comparatively low cost. The physical property of the mineral filler is shown in Table 4. Nomenclature AC asphalt cement, % SSD saturated surface dry ASTM american Society for testing and material t the specimen thickness, mm D diameter of specimen, mm TSR the tensile strength ratio, % HMA hot mix asphalt IRS index of retained strength, % ITS indirect tensile strength, kPa P ultimate load failure, N SCRB state commission of roads and bridge 276 SAHAR HUSSEIN ALI , MOHAMMED QADIR ISMAEL /AL-QADISIYAH JOURNAL FOR ENGINEERING SCIENCES 13 (2020) 274–283 2.2 Combination of Aggregate Gradations A manual sieving for the coarse and fine aggregate was used to classify it into sets according to size. In this study, one kind of gradation was utilized, (12.5mm) nominal maximum size. Then, the combination percent for Type IIIA wearing coarse was selected to meet the job mix formula specified by the (SCRB) [15]. The aggregate gradation is shown in Table 5 and Fig. 1. Table 1: Physical Properties of AC (40-50 ). Tests Units Results SCRB 2003 Specification Limits [15] ASTM Designation [16] Penetration (25 °C, 100 gm., 5 sec) 1/10 mm 47 40 – 50 D-5 Ductility (25 ° C, 5 cm/min) cm 135 ≥ 100 D-113 Kinematics Viscosity, @ 135° C cSt 405 ─ D-2170 Softening Point (Ring & Ball) °C 50 ─ D-36 Flash Point (Cleveland Open Cup ) °C 270 232 min. D-92 Specific gravity at 25 °C ─ 1.04 ─ D-70 After Thin –Film Oven Test ASTM D 1754 Retained Penetration of Residue (25°C, 100 gm. , 5 sec ) % 60 55(min) D 5 Ductility at 25 ° C, 5 cm/min cm 82 >25 D-113 Table 2 : Physical Properties of Coarse Aggregate. Property ASTM Designation [16] Results SCRB Specification [15] Bulk Specific Gravity C-127 2.579 ---- Apparent Specific Gravity C-127 2.601 ---- Percent Water Absorption C-127 0.54 ---- Percent Wear (Los Angeles abrasion) C-131 15.79 30 Max Table 3: The Physical Properties for the Fine Aggregate. Properties ASTM Designation [16] Result SCRB 2003 Specifications [15] Bulk Specific Gravity C-128 2.61 --- Apparent Specific Gravity C-128 2.632 --- Percent Water Absorption C-128 0.952 --- Table. 4: Physical Properties of filler (Limestone Dust). Property Result % passing sieve N0.200 95 Specific Gravity 2.71 Table.5 : Gradation of Combined Aggregate for Wearing Course ( Type IIIA ). Sieve Size Sieve Size (mm) Specification Passing Range (%) Selection Gradation ¾ʺ 19.0 100 100 ½ʺ 12.5 90-100 95 ⅜ʺ 9.5 76-90 83 No.4 4.75 44-74 59 No. 8 2.36 28-58 43 No.50 0.300 5-21 13 N0.200 0.075 4-10 7 Figure 1: The Specification Limits and Selected Gradation for the Wearing Course SCRB [15]. 2.3. Additives: To improve the ability of the asphalt mixtures to resist the damaging effect of moisture presence, ceramic fibres and hydrated lime were used in this research, with different percentages for each additive. 2.3.1. Ceramic Fibers 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 % P a ss in g Sieve Size Opening , mm selection gradation specification uper limit specification lower limit SAHAR HUSSEIN ALI , MOHAMMED QADIR ISMAEL /AL-QADISIYAH JOURNAL FOR ENGINEERING SCIENCES 13 (2020) 274–283 277 The aluminium silicate fibres are formed by melting and blowing molten kaolin with excessive content of the alumina material, or more popular, the materials to be ceramic fibres Arabani et al. [6]. The use of ceramic fibres as a reinforcement of asphalt concrete is limited in Iraq. Therefore, it is chosen to be used in this study. It was selected due to its high tensile strength property and high melting point. The characteristics of ceramic fibers are listed in Table 6. 2.3.2. Hydrated Lime Hydrated lime is well known as an anti-stripping agent. It has been widely utilized as both a filler and additive to resist moisture in the asphalt mixes. Hydrated lime is known to be a promising probable substance for pavements because of its unique chemical, physical, and mechanical characteristics. Hydrated lime was used as an anti-stripping additive for HMA pavements in this study. The physical property and the chemical composition is shown in Table 7 and Table 8 respectively. Table 6 : The basic properties of the ceramic fibers . Table 7: physical properties . Property Hydrated Lime Specific gravity 2.44 % Passing N0.200 99 Table 8: Chemical Composition of Hydrated Lime . 2.4. The Research Methodology For this work, the research methodology consists of four phases. The first phase of the experimental part was represented by bringing the substances of asphalt binder, aggregates, the mineral filler, and ceramic fibres and hydrated lime additives and by testing the physical properties of the materials. The second phase include the preparation of asphalt cement mixtures that will be formed to locate the optimum asphalt content of the control mix, without additives. The third phase was to determine the optimum asphalt content of the mixture specimens with ceramic fibre and hydrated lime based on Marshall characteristics. Moreover, in the fourth phase, in addition to the volumetric properties, the Marshall properties flow and stability values are determined to satisfy the requirement of Iraqi specifications. The optimum asphalt contents specified by these tests were 4.9 for the control mixture, and 5.30 for modified mixtures. Then to produce mixtures for indirect tensile tests to evaluate (TSR) and compressive strength tests for assessing (IRS). 2.5. Methods of Incorporating Additives into the Mixture To add ceramic fibre with hydrated lime to the asphalt cement mixture, the dry method for ceramic fibre and the saturated surface dry process for hydrated lime were used. Using the Saturated Surface Dry method (SSD) for hydrated lime, water was added at 3% of the weight of the combined aggregate without filler. Then, the additives were added and well mixed with; the wet aggregate was left to dry in an oven for two hours at 150 °C. After that, the filler was added to and mixed with asphalt. 2.6. Tensile Strength Ratio Test (TSR) The process for preparing and testing the asphalt concrete samples and of measuring the influence of moisture on the tensile strength for the asphalt mixture is covered by the TSR. This test is utilized to evaluate the impact of the humidity on the asphalt mixture. For more information, ASTM D-4867 [16] provides a full description of this test. The samples in this test were worked out to have the number of blows that give 7±1% the air voids appropriate to the job - mix formulation by the trial method by prepared samples free from any additive by made by using the number of blows(45,55,65,75) respectively. The number of blows was 54 to give this percent, as shown in Fig. 2 below. After identifying the number of blows, groups of Marshall specimens were prepared in six samples where each group is divided into two sets, three samples for every set. The first set was located in a water bath at 25 °C for 30 minutes (specimens unconditioned ), then the ITS has been calculated for every sample and the ITS average for the three samples was determined. The second set was located in a vacuum container full of distilled water at 25 °C to remove the air content. After that, the specimens were put in the freezer for 16 hrs. at -18±3 °C. After the freezing cycle, the samples were put at a water bath for 24 hrs. at 60 °C to complete the thawing cycle. It has been extracted and put in another water bath at 25 °C for 1hr, and the ITS for these specimens conditioned was calculated. Properties Ceramic fibers Type NC1260 Appearance White cotton shape Morphological structure Glass state Average length (mm) 2.0 Average diameter (𝜇𝑚) 3.0 Thermal conductivity 0.03 ) 3Density ( kg/m 128 Melting Point (°C ) 1760 Tensile strength ( kPa) 83 The Chemical composition (%) 3O2Al 52 2+SiO3 O2Al 95 3O2Fe <0.2 2ZrO / Chemical composition Percent % CaO 56.1 2SiO 1.38 MgO 0.13 3O2Fe 0.12 3O2Al 0.72 3SO 0.21 L.O.I 40.65 278 SAHAR HUSSEIN ALI , MOHAMMED QADIR ISMAEL /AL-QADISIYAH JOURNAL FOR ENGINEERING SCIENCES 13 (2020) 274–283 The ITS calculations are made according to the method shown in ASTM D-6931-12 [16]. The sample was located in the loading apparatus, and the loading strips have been put parallel and centered onto the perpendicular diametrical level. The length of the loading strips has exceeded the thickness of the specimen. A diametrical load was applied at 50.8mm/min (2in. /min) until the failure of the sample. The samples and the tests are shown in Fig. 3. The extreme load which causes that breakdown was registered and the ITS were calculated according to the following equation: ITS= 𝟐𝟎𝟎𝟎𝑷𝒖𝒍𝒕 𝝅 𝒕 𝑫 (1) Where: ITS = Indirect Tensile Strength , (kPa) . Pult = Ultimate applied load required to fail specimen,(N). t = thickness of the sample,(mm). D = diameter of sample , (mm) . After calculation of ITS for conditioned and unconditioned samples for each set, the tensile strength ratio was calculated as below: TSR = 𝐜𝐨𝐧.𝐈𝐓𝐒 𝐮𝐧𝐜𝐨𝐧.𝐈𝐓𝐒 × 𝟏𝟎𝟎 (2) Where : TSR = Tensile Strength Ratio, % . con. ITS = average ITS of the moisture – conditioned samples, kPa. uncon. ITS= average ITS unconditioned (dry) samples , kPa . The minimum TSR value is ( 80%) according to the ASTM D-4867-09 [16]. Figure 2 : Relationship between No. of Blows and Air Voids Percent . (a) Some of the specimens (b) sample under test . (c) sample after test ( failure). Figure 3: Tensile Strength Ratio Test 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 40 50 60 70 80 % A ir V o id s No. of Blows SAHAR HUSSEIN ALI , MOHAMMED QADIR ISMAEL /AL-QADISIYAH JOURNAL FOR ENGINEERING SCIENCES 13 (2020) 274–283 279 2.7. Compressive Strength Test A compressive strength of a compacted mixture is usually conducted to determine its suitability for use in the pavement under a given load and environmental condition. This test was conducted according to ASTM D- 1074 – 02 [16]. The prepared mixture is compacted by using a compressive device. Samples of 4 in. height (101.6mm) and diameter of 4 in. (101.6mm) were prepared. The specimens were cooled for 24 hours before being tested for compressive strength at a rate of loading of 5.08 mm/min. Then they were placed in a vertical position so that the axial load could be applied to the first surface of the specimen until it fails. Compressive strength specimens and tests are shown in Fig. 4. (a) Cylinder specimens (b) Specimen before loading (c) Specimen after loading and failure Figure 4: Compressive Strength Test. 2.8. Index of Retained Strength Test This method covers the measurement of the cohesion loss producing from the impact of water on compressed the asphalt mixtures. A group of six samples prepared for that purpose divided into two groups. Three samples for the compressive strength after putting into the air bath with 25 °C for nearly 4 hr. were examined. The three other samples have been put in the water bath with 60 °C for 24 hr. and then transmitted to the water bath, and kept for 2 hours at 25 °C before the compressive strength testing. The IRS is calculated in accordance with the ASTM D-1075-07 [16] specifications, which must be within a minimum of 70% as adopted by SCRB [15]. 3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 3.1. Tensile Strength Ratio Results The dry indirect tensile strength, wet indirect tensile strength, and T.S.R values for the asphalt mixtures containing ceramic fibers with hydrated lime for all percentages are greater than the values of the control mixture. The dry ITS with 1% ceramic fiber values have been higher than those with 0.5,1.5, and 2 % ceramic fiber. Samples containing 1, 1.5, and 2 % hydrated lime (by weighing the total mixtures) with 1% ceramic fiber have higher dry indirect tensile strength values than the mixtures of control. The effect of the ceramic fiber content increases the dry ITS values because of the increase of tensile modulus of elasticity; this increase is because ceramic fibers with hydrated lime have a much higher strength. The mixture was stiffer into the specimen because the fibers have a random orientation in various directions, strongly connect particles within the matrix, and eventually stop them from moving. Furthermore, given that the hydrated lime has a high surface area, the aggregate was plated with enough amount of the asphalt, and as a result, the adhesion force became higher between asphalt and aggregate and prevented the stripping beneath the influence of the moisture. As a result, the value of the TSR increased in a way that indicates the increment in the resistance of moisture of asphalt 280 SAHAR HUSSEIN ALI , MOHAMMED QADIR ISMAEL /AL-QADISIYAH JOURNAL FOR ENGINEERING SCIENCES 13 (2020) 274–283 mixture together with the addition of ceramic fiber and hydrated lime. The effect of ceramic fiber with hydrated lime is shown in Table 9 and Fig. 5 through 7 respectively. Table 9: Indirect Tensile Strength Test Results. Additives Additive, % Dry ITS (kPa) Wet ITS (kPa) TSR( %) Control mix 0 1243 953 76.71 Ceramic Fiber with Hydrated Lime 0.5 CF +1H 1467 1141 77.77 0.5 CF+1.5H 1645 1336 81.22 0.5 CF +2 H 1281 1005 78.49 1 CF +1 H 1489 1180 79.25 1 CF+1.5 H 2170 1917 88.34 1 CF +2 H 1809 1489 82.30 1.5 CF +1 H 1370 1083 79.08 1.5 CF +1.5 H 1526 1222 80.05 1.5 CF +2 H 1415 1117 78.95 2 CF+1 H 1284 994 77.39 2 CF +1.5 H 1348 1061 78.73 2 CF +2 H 1255 968 77.15 Figure 5: Effect the Percentages of Ceramic Fibers Content and Hydrated Lime Content on Dry Indirect Tensile Strength . Figure 6: Effect the Percentages of Ceramic Fibers Content and Hydrated Lime Content on Wet Indirect Tensile Strength. Figure 7: Effect of Fibers Content and Hydrated Lime Content on Tensile Strength Ratio. 3.2. Index of Retained Strength results The IRS to evaluates the resistance of the asphalt mixture to the susceptibility of moisture has been utilized. In accordance with the SCRB [15], the minimum value of the allowed IRS is 70% which has been considered as a measure if the asphalt mixture is susceptible to moisture. The results of the increase in the value of dry compressive strength, wet compressive strength and IRS percentage in the asphalt mixture modified with ceramic fiber with hydrated lime is listed in Table 10 and Fig. 8 through 12. 0 250 500 750 1000 1250 1500 1750 2000 2250 2500 Control mix 1 HL 1.5 HL 2HL In d ir e c t T e n si le S tr e n g th ( k P a ) Ceramic Fiber with Hydrated lime, % 2% CF 0.5% CF 1%CF 1.5% CF 0 250 500 750 1000 1250 1500 1750 2000 2250 2500 Control mix 1 HL 1.5 HL 2HL In d ir e c t T e n si le S tr e n g th ( k P a ) Ceramic Fiber with Hydrated lime, % 2% CF 0.5% CF 1%CF 1.5% CF 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Control mix 1 HL 1.5 HL 2HL T S R , % Ceramic fiber with Hydrated lime , % TSR% (0.5 % CF ) TSR% (1% CF) TSR% ( 1.5 % CF) TSR% (2% CF ) SAHAR HUSSEIN ALI , MOHAMMED QADIR ISMAEL /AL-QADISIYAH JOURNAL FOR ENGINEERING SCIENCES 13 (2020) 274–283 281 The values for dry compressive strength and wet compressive strength of mixtures that contain ceramic fibers with hydrated lime have been higher than those in the control mixture. The values of the dry and wet compressive strength were higher with 1% ceramic fiber than those with 0.5,1.5, and 2 % ceramic fiber. Samples containing 1, 1.5, and 2 % hydrated lime, by weighing the total mixtures, with 1% ceramic fiber have higher values of the dry compressive strength than the mixtures of control. The mixture was stiffer into the specimen because the fibers have a random orientation in various directions, strongly connect particles within the matrix, and eventually stop them from moving. Moreover, given that the hydrated lime has a high surface area, the aggregate was plated with enough amount of the asphalt, and as a result, the adhesion force became higher between asphalt and aggregate and prevented the stripping beneath the influence of the moisture. As a result, the value of the IRS increased in a way that indicates the increment in the resistance of moisture of asphalt mixture together with the addition of ceramic fiber and hydrated lime. Where the addition of ceramic fiber and hydrated lime makes the asphalt mixture of a greater resistance for compression beneath the influence of the moisture. This leads to increasing the IRS which in turn leads to increasing the moisture resistance. Table 10: Results of Index of Retained Strength (IRS%) Tests. Additives Additi ves, % Dry Compressive Strength (kPa) Wet Compressive Strength (kPa) IRS (%) Control Mix 0 6858 5052 73.6 7 Ceramic Fiber with Hydrated Lime 0.5 CF +1H 7325 5743 78.4 0 0.5 CF +1.5H 8504 7005 82.3 7 0.5 CF +2H 7590 6095 80.3 0 1 CF +1 H 7704 6493 84.2 7 1 CF +1.5 H 9807 8678 88.4 8 1 CF +2 H 7338 6150 83.8 0 1.5 CF +1 H 7046 5898 83.7 1 1 .5CF +1.5 H 7576 6515 86.0 0 1.5 CF +2 H 6931 5779 83.3 8 2 CF +1 H 7064 5889 83.3 7 2CF +1.5 H 7201 6127 85.0 8 2CF +2 H 6927 5647 81.5 2 Figure 8: Effect of Percentages of Fiber on the Dry and Wet Compressive Strength for (0.5% CF). Figure 9: Effect of Percentages of Fiber on the Dry and Wet Compressive Strength for (1% CF). 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000 11000 12000 Control mix 1 HL 1.5 HL 2HL C o m p r e ss iv e s tr e n g th ( k P a ) Ceramic fiber with hydrated lime, % Wet compressive strength(kPa) Dry Compressive strength(kPa) 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000 11000 12000 Control mix 1 HL 1.5 HL 2HL C o m p r e ss iv e s tr e n g th ( k P a ) Ceramic fiber with hydrated lime, % Wet compressive strength(kPa) Dry Compressive strength(kPa) 282 SAHAR HUSSEIN ALI , MOHAMMED QADIR ISMAEL /AL-QADISIYAH JOURNAL FOR ENGINEERING SCIENCES 13 (2020) 274–283 Figure 10: Effect of Percentages of Fiber on the Dry and Wet Compressive Strength for (1.5% CF). Figure 11: Effect of Percentages of Fiber on the Dry and Wet Compressive Strength for(2%CF). Figure 12: Effect of Fibers Content and Hydrated Lime Content on the IRS. 4. CONCLUSIONS According to the specification of substances and test result utilized in the present study, the following points have been concluded: • The addition of ceramic fiber as a reinforcement and the hydrated lime as anti-stripping has led to a reduction in the moisture susceptibility of the asphalt mixture as a result of the excess in TSR values. • The dry ITS, wet ITS, and TSR values were higher than the control mixtures for the asphalt mixtures containing ceramic fiber with hydrated lime for all percentages. • The addition of 1% ceramic fiber with1.5% hydrated lime has given the highest TSR which was 86.55 % compared with the control asphalt mixture that was 76.71 %. • The results of the dry compressive strength, wet compressive strength, and IRS values were higher than the control mixtures for the asphalt mixtures containing ceramic fiber with hydrated lime for all percentages. • The addition of 1% of ceramic fiber with 1.5% hydrated lime has also recorded the highest IRS, which was 88.48 % compared with the control asphalt mixture which has been 73.67 %. Acknowledgments Thanks and appreciation go to members of the Department of Civil Engineering and the staff of Transportation Laboratories in the Department of Civil Engineering, University of Baghdad for providing research facilities during of work. 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000 11000 12000 Control mix 1 HL 1.5 HL 2HL C o m p r e ss iv e s tr e n g th ( k P a ) Ceramic fiber with hydrated lime, % Wet compressive strength(kPa) Dry Compressive strength(kPa) 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000 11000 12000 Control mix 1 HL 1.5 HL 2HL C o m p r e ss iv e s tr e n g th ( k P a ) Ceramic fiber with hydrated lime, % Wet compressive strength(kPa) Dry Compressive strength(kPa) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Control mix 1 HL 1.5 HL 2HL IR S , % Ceramic fiber with hydrated lime, % IRS% (2% CF) TSR% (0.5 % CF ) IRS% (1% CF) IRS% (1.5% CF) SAHAR HUSSEIN ALI , MOHAMMED QADIR ISMAEL /AL-QADISIYAH JOURNAL FOR ENGINEERING SCIENCES 13 (2020) 274–283 283 REFERENCES [1] Adriana, V.N., Fabricio, L. V., José, P. A., and Luis, L. S., Evaluating Moisture Susceptibility of Asphalt Concrete Mixtures through Simple Performance Tests. Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, 2015. [2] Abuawad, I.M.A., Imad L. Al-Qadi, and James S. Trepanier, Mitigation of Moisture Damage in Asphalt Concrete: Testing Techniques and Additives/modifiers Effectiveness. Construction and Building Materials 84 (June 2015): 437–443. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.03.001, 2015. [3] Ismael, M.Q., and Al-Taher, Hiba M., Reinforcement of Asphalt Concrete by Polyester Fibers to Improve Flexural Bending Fatigue Resistance. Journal of Engineering 21, no. 1 (2015): 115-130., 2015. [4] Sebaaly, P.E., Hajj, E. Y., Sathanathan, T., and Shivakolunthar, S. , A comprehensive evaluation of moisture damage of asphalt concrete mixtures. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 18(2), 169- 182, 2017. [5] Hicks, R.G., Santucci, L., and Aschenbrener, T. . Introduction and Seminar Objectives." Moisture Sensitivity of Asphalt Pavements, A National Seminar. in Transportation Research Board Miscellaneous Report, Transportation research Board, 3-36. 2003. [6] Arabani, M., Mirabdolazimi, S. , Experimental investigation of the fatigue behavior of asphalt concrete mixtures containing waste iron powder. Mater. Sci. Eng.: A. 528 (10–11) () 3866–3870, 2016. [7] Xu, Q., Chen, H., and Prozzi, J. A., Performance of fiber reinforced asphalt concrete under environmental temperature and water effects. Construction and Building materials, 24(10), 2003-2010, 2010. [8] Moreno-Navarro, F., Sol-Sánchez, M., Rubio-Gámez, M. C., and Segarra- Martínez, M., The use of additives for the improvement of the mechanical behavior of high modulus asphalt mixes. Construction and Building Materials, 70, 65-70, 2014. [9] Wan, J., S. Wu, Y. Xiao, Q. Liu, and E. Schlangen, Characteristics of ceramic fiber modified asphalt mortar. Materials 9 (9): 788. https://doi .org/10.3390/ma9090788, 2016. [10] Wu, M., Li, R. , Zhang, Y. , Wei, J. , Lv, Y. , Ding, X. , Reinforcement effect of fiber and deoiled asphalt on high viscosity rubber/SBS modified asphalt mortar. Pet. Sci. 11 (3) () 454–459, 2014. [11] Epps, J., Berger, E., and Anagnos, J. N. Treatments." Moisture Sensitivity of Asphalt Pavements, A National Seminar. in Transportation Research Board Miscellaneous Report, Transportation Research Board, 117-186. 2003. [12] Ismael, M.Q., and Ahmed, Hussein Ahmed, Effect of Hydrated Lime on Moisture Susceptibility of Asphalt Mixtures. Journal of Engineering 25, no. 3 (): 89-101, 2019. [13] Hunter, E.R., and Ksaibati, K., Evaluating Moisture Susceptibility of asphalt Mixtures. 2002: Laramie: University of Wyoming. [14] Aboud, G.M., Jassem, N. H., AlAmili, S., Abdulhussein, A. A. , Effect of Polymer’s Type and Content on Tensile Strength of Polymers Modified Asphalt Mixes. Al-Qadisiyah Journal for Engineering Sciences 13.1: 7-12, 2020. [15] State Corporation of Roads and Bridges (SCRB), General Specification for Roads and Bridges, Section R/9, Hot-Mix Asphalt Concrete Pavement, in Ministry of Housing and Construction, Republic of Iraq. 2003. [16] American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 04.03, in Road and Paving Materials Vehicle Pavement Systems. 2015. https://doi/