AL-QADISIYAH JOURNAL FOR ENGINEERING SCIENCES   14 (2021) 021–030 
 

   
       Contents lists available at http://qu.edu.iq 

 

Al-Qadisiyah Journal for Engineering Sciences 

  
Journal homepage: http://qu.edu.iq/journaleng/index.php/JQES  

  

 

* Corresponding author.  

E-mail address: mushtaq76h@gmail.com  (Mushtaq I. Hasan ) 
 
https://doi.org/10.30772/qjes.v14i1.735  
2411-7773/© 2021 University of Al-Qadisiyah. All rights reserved.                                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. 

    

A review of earth to air heat exchanger as a passive cooling and heating 

technique and the affecting parameters 

 

Mushtaq I. Hasana*  ,  Dhay Mohammed Mutera  

aDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Thi‐Qar, Nasiriyah 64001, Iraq  
 

A R T I C L E  I N F O 

Article history:  

Received  18 February 2021 

Received in revised form 31 March  2021 

Accepted 15  April 2021 

 

Keywords: 

computational fluid dynamics 

 earth‐to‐air heat exchanger system 

geothermal energy 

 heating, cooling 

 affecting parameters 

 thermal performance 

 

A B S T R A C T 

In the recent time the EAHE is widely used as a passive cooling and heating technique due to the mounting 

thermal potential of earth as and as a result of energy crisis. In the past years many researches published 

including studying this type of heat exchanger and using it in many applications and many locations with 

different climate conditions. Also, these researches investigated the most affecting parameters. In this paper 

a review is prepared to survey the published literature in this field to shed a light on the research. 

 

 

 

© 2021 University of Al-Qadisiyah. All rights reserved. 

1. Introduction: 

    The requirement to reduction a   consumption in the energy for heating 

and cooling loads improved through past time. Energy saving can be 

reached by depend on the renewable energies for example solar, wind and 

geothermal energy. For heating and cooling buildings it can be reliant on 

the ground for example warmth source in the winter and as     heat     sink 

in the summer. The utilities of the    geothermal energy in heating and 

cooling spaces can be consummate by using (EAHE) or moreover named 

earth heat exchanger Singh et al. [1]. 

   Earth to air heat exchanger is a passive heating and cooling systems and 

it used in wide types of application for example heating and cooling 

greenhouse, industrial and inhabitation buildings. EAHE is usually involves 

of pipe or more -pipes that inside the earth vertically or level. First the end 

of the tube is linked to the supply end of the fan and the other  

 

 

 

 

 

of side is open for air. While the air of flows during the inhumed  of tubes, 

the heat is transmission from air to the contiguous soil through  a  summer 

period and the opposite  in  a winter. 

 

 

 

 

Abbreviations 

DE          Dry heat exchanger                          P.P           pumping power 

COP     Coefficient of performance                 WE        Wet heat exchanger 

EAHE     Earth Air Heat Exchanger 

 

 

http://qu.edu.iq/
https://doi.org/10.30772/qjes.v13i
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/


22 MUSHTAQ I. HASAN ,  DHAY  MOHAMMED MUTER /AL-QADISIYAH JOURNAL FOR ENGINEERING SCIENCES   14 (2021) 021–030 

 

 

2. Applications: 

The earth to air heat exchanger used in many applications mainly in Yusof 

et al. [2] 

 1) Agricultural applications, 2) residential building Equations 

2.1. Agricultural applications: 

Okonkwo, W et al . [3] conducted an experimentally  investigation the  

poultry  house, with solar Trombe  wall which is equipped in order to the  

provide the  ventilation, cooling and heating to a poultry house. They noted  

that the EAHEs  maintained  the temperature in the range from  28°C -35°C, 

586 is grams the average body weight, the rate of mortality is around 3%and 

the feed conversion ratio is 1.87% . Ahachad, M et al.[ 4] and Fawaz, H et 

al. [ 6] performed  experimentally the influence of the heat stress 

phenomenon are offered with simulating and modeling on the poultry house 

and it  the effect of all parameter  on     the    performance of the    building 

(shape , ventilation, orientation etc) in  North of Morocco. From the results 

showed temperature will decrease per 2 air changes per hour by about 

1.5°C,     for   5 air    changes    per       hour to  2.7 C° and for 10 air changes 

per hour 3.8 C°, the temperature of the inlet air reduction (up to 9 C°), and 

the production quality is enhancement. the ventilation lead to a full decrease 

of   the   cycle    cooling capacity of     29.9 %.   Choi, Salim et al. [5] studied 

the geothermal of  heat pump for heating of poultry  house, the geothermal 

of heat pump allows the  lesser cost of heating, developed  the production 

performance with decline  amount of  the gases discharges.  Kapica, J,et al. 

[7] estimated the decrease of CO2 by using the  solar-wind hybrid system 

for heating the  house of  poultry hey discovered  that the larger system 

provides a greater CO2 drop ,however the energy utilization ratio 

reductions . Azzeddine L aknizi. [8 ]study plan and modeling of the  earth 

to air HE for the  typical poultry house to estimate the potential of cooling 

and heating. They results found that the outlet temperature is 15°C for 

cooling mode  of  summer  and     heating    mode  in winter was 21.8°C.. 

Azzeddine et al. [9] studied the thermal performance of the EAHEs through 

the parametrical to investigate the influences of the velocity  of the   air, the 

physical   properties    and the   diameter  of    the pipe.   The  results 

displayed that a heat exchanger gives the  coefficient of  performance is 

higher with a  upper    efficiency and a    system has the potential energy  

146.38 M W h  in heating and 104.3  M W h in cooling modes.  Wasseemet 

al. [10] studied experimentally the   thermal performance of EAHE in arid 

and humid soil  in the Basra in the semi   desert region for a poultry shed. 

They found results advances the overall heat exchange efficiency. The 

(COP) of the wetted exchanger with an average COP of 6.41, while  the dry 

exchanger ( DE) obtained the value of 5. 07. On average, the exit 

temperature from the wet exchanger ( WE )was 37.35°C ,however in the 

dry exchanger it was 38.91°C in  the warmest hours of the day. Also, the 

WHE warmed the air over than the dry exchanger system, throughout the 

night time. 

2.2. Residential building: 

   Sodha et al. [11] investigated the EAHEs pipe length requisite in the 

cooling of   the model with different earth surface dealings of Delhi (India) 

for compound climate. Observed  from the result that for meeting the 

cooling load demand the dry sunny superficies requisite long tunnel, while, 

wet covered surface requisite the smallest length one. From the parametric 

of  their research, saw that improvement for  the temperature of the  profiles 

in soil with great moisture  of substances is faster than compared to  the soil 

by little moisture substances. Sharan and Jadhav [12] used EAHEs  to 

heating and cooling with modes was working in India ,Ahmedabad, with 

yearly  the middle temperature varieties between (23◦C and 43◦C). They 

found that a  system was capable to rise the temperature with  nearly 14◦C 

in January and reduce the temperature in May with a same value. The 

performance coefficient (COP) for heating and cooling was 3.8and 3.3, 

correspondingly. F. Al-Ajmi et al.[ 13] improved a theoretically model to 

calculate the earth  to air heat exchanger  temperature  of air outlet and the 

potential of this cooling apparatus in a warm and dry weather. The model 

for the classic home of Kuwait City. They found  that    the EAHEs   had 

the ability to decrease home cooling energy request through the summer 

season by 30%.  M.K. Ghosal and G.N.Tiwari .[14] in India, analytically 

model was advanced to study the  efficiency of the  earth  thermal air heat 

exchanger combined greenhouse found in New Delhi. Their Results 

presented that the thermal performance  was suitable and  advance by  using 

of EAHEs . M.K.Ghosal et al. [15] presented advanced numerical model of 

using the kept thermal energy of earth for space warming to investigate the 

potential with the advantage of (EAHE) systems with the greenhouses 

situated in the Delhi, India. Experimental. They found that the  air 

temperature were discovered to be on the  average  from( 7-8 C°  ) greater 

than a same greenhouse when operational minus EAHE.    Cheletal et al 

[16] executed experimentally during winter season thermal analysis with 

EAHE systems  for the building integrated. The dimensions of building air 

temperature showed that with using EAHE system is an increase by 5 – 

15.8 ˚C in the  temperature  of air of building  compared by ambient air 

temperature, consequently the concluded that the EAHE is appropriate to 

an axillary system for heating and cooling buildings . Transient Systems 

Simulation Software (TRNSYS)  by Abdullahi  Ahmed. et al. [ 17]  

estimated a thermal performance of the EAHEs   for unlike shapes and work 

conditions in the UK. Their  result showed major enhancement in potential 

and internal thermal conditions to decrease  use of the  energy concentrated 

conservative cooling system . Bansal et al. [18] and Vaz et al. [20] showed 

out a numerical  studies by the help of FLUENT based on  the 

computational fluid dynamics(CFD) surroundings for calculating the 

heating   and   cooling capability of earth to air-pipe heat exchanger 

(EAPHE ) system .  Mohammad Jia et al. [19] investigated  experimentally 

the measurement   the capacity of cooling the  ETAHEs  in Bangladesh..  

They found  that the COP and  the capacity of  Cooling increased with the 

increase of mass rate  of flow ,the outlet temperature  declined below 

ambient temperature as the inlet air. Khalajzadeh et al. [21] estimated the  

performance thermal of earth heat exchanger  (GHE) and evaporative 

cooler hybrid systems of Tehran, Iran in summer climate. They [60] saw 

that the hybrid systems are able to change the conventional air conditioner 

efficiently and its cooling efficacy is higher than unity.  Tudor et al. [22] 

analyzed and advanced the suitability of using the EAHEs as the passive 

method for heating and cooling of houses under the climate for five cities 

of South – Eastern Europe. They obtained that the exit air temperature from 

EAHEs noted during July and August month was the maximum monthly 

average, while in January month  was the minimum. Moreover, they 

discussed, best the thermal performance and the high heat gain record with 

using pipe diameter of 100 mm instead of 200 and 300 mm &17 m pipe 

length instead of 10 and 5 m, 2.5 & 3.5 m burial depth in its place  of 1 m 

.Ramirez-Davila et al [23] executed numerically study on the performance 

thermal of the (EATHE)  system by  changing climatic conditions for three 

cities in Mexico. Their results presented that use of EAHEs  was suitable 

for extreme and enough temperature areas wherever the thermal inertia 



MUSHTAQ I. HASAN ,  DHAY  MOHAMMED MUTER /AL-QADISIYAH JOURNAL FOR ENGINEERING SCIENCES   14 (2021) 021–030                                                                                      23 

 

 

influence is greater in soil. Earth  to  air heat exchangers (EAHE) s  with 

solar chimneys  Haorong Li. et al. [24].  Experiments studied to estimate 

the performance the system in summer to investigates an innovative passive 

air conditioning system. They noted  that EAHE full cooling aptitude in that 

Experimental was 3308 W, while the maximum cooling ability  of coupled 

system EAHEs and solar chimneys was 2582 W, and they concluded that 

the increase in the exit air temperature . Trilok Singh Bisoniya et al.[25] 

discussed the decrease a  cooling of  energy demand of buildings 

experimentally in dry and hot climate Bhopal (Central India)  .Observations 

of  ; temperature  was drop from 12.90 °C to11.30 °C and the gain energy 

of  cooling of EAHEs improve 0.85    to  1.87 MJ h for  the air flow  of 

speeds of 2m/s to 5m/s . Trilok Singh Bisoniya et al. [26]discussed the  

efficiency of decreasing the  heat of energy  request of buildings in dry and 

cold winter climate conditions by using EAHE. Experimental results  

showed that heating potential various from   0.59 to    1.22MJ h for air  of  

flow speeds of 2  to 5 m/s  ,also correlation coefficient and root mean square 

of percentages deviance of 2.1% and 0.999.  Nitish Shrestha et al. [27] 

Performance analysis of EAHE at different atmospheric conditions, 

Experimental that system consist  of finned tube. Observed that in cooling 

mode the inlet temperature of the air drops with rise in the pipe length. The 

temperature reduction for a length of 1.2m differs from 1-3 C° at velocity 

6.5m/sec.  G.N. Tiwari et al. [28] experimentally estimate thermal 

conductivity of a soil, the  EAHE system has been planned ,measurement 

of room with improved values of radius of pipe, length of pipe, number of 

air variations, and depth at which( HE) be fixed under the superficies of the 

ground. They  observed that the outlet air temperature a reduction of( 5 – 6 

°C ) in summer for a number of 5 air variations with 0.10 m and 21 m 

enhanced diameter and pipe length respectively. Sanjeev  Jakhar. et al. [29] 

expected   experimentally  the  thermal of  performance of earth to air tunnel 

heat exchanger (EATHE ) system linked by the  solar air heating duct to 

develop the capacity of heating EATHE system. They noted that the 

capability  of heating of EATHE system improved from 1217.625 to 

1280.753 kWh after it was   linked with  the solar air heating duct with a 

significant rise of temperature of room by 1.1– 3.5 ◦C . the effect of a 

thermal performance of EAHE by its design parameters are planned 

numerically by Thakur et al.[ 30]. From result their displayed that the 

thermal performance improved with using finned pipe wherever the air 

temperature  was recorded drop about 20.5 ˚C compared with 17.7 ˚C when 

the pipe is finless. Numerical study  by Benhammou et al. [ 31] to estimate 

the thermal of  performance of  the (EAHE)system a passing one 

dimensional season below the climate conditions of Algerian Sahara. 

through summer . They found that the decline in the air temperature 

between inside and exit of the system is greater with high  the inlet air 

temperature consequently by the  tube length of 50 m, the drop in the air  of 

temperature is 11 ˚C for the air inside  temperature of 44 ˚C and is 5 C°  for 

the air inside  temperature of 29 ˚C. After observing their results they 

reached to that the thermal of  performance of EAHEs developed at great 

air    temperature through  the summer season. Hiresh .et al. [32] performed 

an experimental operate to study the earth to Air Heat exchanger    

performance. They found that about 261.5 W  was  the maximum quantity 

of heat transfer from air to surrounding soil at 5 m/s  the velocity of  air. 

Also, they explained  from the results that with temperature of inlet air 

changing from 32 ˚C to 40.3 ˚C the exit air temperature increased with 4.5 

˚C at 5 m/s.   Anuj Mathur et al [33] showed    an numerical the problematic 

of increase of    heat nearby the tube during the   summer period by  soil 

having low moisture content and great specific heat. They obtained  that the 

saturation of soil with  heat hampers the      performance  of   EAHEs and  

the heat can be enhanced in winter days with  running the system.   Sanjeev 

et al. [34] discuss experimentally and simulation typical with using 

TRNSYS 17 to evaluation the heating of  potential of earth air heat 

exchanger      with    and    without    solar heat pipe (SHD). They establish 

through  the simulation results and experimental results that the heating 

capacity and exit air  of temperature of EAHEs enhanced by using solar 

heat duct.   

Figure 1: Experimental set-up of EATHE coupled with solar air 

heating duct. 

Moreover, in the winter season  they found that the exit air  of  

temperature improved    by     reduced air velocity.  Badgaiyan P et al. [35]. 

evaluated the performance of EAHE with several operating parameters was 

studied experimentally and numerically. They proved that thermal 

performance enhanced with increasing the length of  pipe, wherever the 

outlet temperature reduced. Additionally, they concluded that for three 

velocity of air flow (4, 5, and 6 m/s). the less outside temperature found 

with 4 m/s air velocity .Omar Hamdi et al. [36] study the    performance  of 

the earth -to-air heat exchanger (EAHEs) and discovery out the usefulness 

of the cooling of buildings in the hot region in the south east of  the Algeria 

at Biskra University. From result observed  The air temperature at the 

outside of the exchanger is about 24 °C at the starting  of May to reach 

nearly 32 C° in early September.  Nasreddine Sakhri1 et al. [ 37] 

experimentally study is showed on the performance of a combined system 

:EAHEs    and the  solar   chimney. as an arid region in the North-west of 

the city of  Bechar, Algeria. They showed results of the capacity  of the 

system to rise the outlet air temperature exit the system by 14 °C and 

produce the heating mode. The inside temperature increased ,then, the 

system travelled to a cooling mode by decreasing this temperature of  air 

by 11.6 °C (from    36.2 °C at the inside to    24.6 °C at   the outside ). Three 

dimensional EAHEs  combined with a house building by Mushtaq I. Hasan 

and Sajad W. Noori [ 38] discussed  a numerical  the potential for drop in 

energy consumption for heating and cooling loads by using  the  EAHE 

system in southern Iraq in the weather of Nasiriya city .They results showed 

that thermal performance and the outlet air temperature improved with 

length and the pipe of number of the EAHE system. So,  The EAHEs   is 

higher appropriate for  work through winter month , wherever ,  the    drop 

in energy saving and heating capacity are great compared with the decrease 

in energy saving and cooling capacity in summer months. 

 

 

 

 



24 MUSHTAQ I. HASAN ,  DHAY  MOHAMMED MUTER /AL-QADISIYAH JOURNAL FOR ENGINEERING SCIENCES   14 (2021) 021–030 

 

 

2.3.Study  the  earth to air heat exchanger  performance 

with solar chimney: 

     Also, they used MATLAB software with CFD modeling by. Salman 

H  et al. [ 39] studied to  the investigating the influence of  tube length   , 

the  air  of speed , and     tube   diameter on a performance      of the air 

thermal HE system in Basrah, used (EAHE) collected with Solar chimney 

(SC) .The results have shown that the temperature at outlet from the  buried   

pipe declines with rising the pipe length  , declining pipe diameter, 

declining mass flow rates of flowing air in the tube and rising depths    up 

to   4m.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Figure 2: the Earth–tube–air heat exchanger system. 

Earth   to -air heat exchangers (EAHEs) with solar chimneys  by 

Haorong Li. et al. [ 24].  Experiments studied to evaluate the performance 

the system in summer to investigates an innovative passive air conditioning 

system. They noted  that EAHE maximum cooling capacity during that 

Experimental was 3308 W, while the full cooling capability  of coupled 

system EAHEs and solar chimneys was 2582 W, and they saw that the rise 

in the outside air temperature . Nasreddine Sakhri1. et al. [ 40] an 

experimental investigation is showed on the performance of a combined 

system: earth-to-air heat exchanger and a  solar chimney, as an arid region 

in the North-west of the city of Bechar, Algeria. They showed results the 

capacity  of the system to rise the outlet air temperature exit the system with    

14 °C    and   produce a heating mode. The inside  temperature increased 

,then, a system travelled to the cooling mode by decreasing this temperature 

of  air with  11.6 °C    (    from 36.2 °C at the inside  to 24.6 °C    at    the 

exit ).                                                              

2.4.E ffect of soil type and moisture content on EAHEs: 

   After the parametric study by Puri. [40] Saw that advance of 

temperature profiles is quicker in soil by  great humidity substances than  to    

soil    by little humidity contents. Their result improvement of  the 

temperature with  soil moisture contents.. Sodha et al. [11] studied the earth 

air HE pipe length requisite in the cooling of  the model with different earth 

surface dealings of Delhi (India) for compound climate. Observed  from the 

result that for meeting the cooling load demand the dry sunny surface 

requisite long tunnel, while, wet shaded superficies requisite the smallest 

length one. And , improvement of  the temperature of the  profiles in soil 

by great moisture  of contents is faster than compared to the soil with little 

moisture substances.  Santamouris et al. [41] studied the effect of different 

earth superficies the boundary of conditions on the of a multiple and a single 

parallel EAHEs They provide efficiency  is high by using EAHE.. Clara et 

al. [42] Presented the influence of soil shield, soil composition and climate, 

on the performance of the EAHE systems. They reached that the bare 

surface for heating develops the performance of the EAHE, while the 

surface humid  for the cooling object is better. They additionally ,showed 

that the higher water contented and a carefully packed soil nearby the tubes 

of EAHEs develop EAHE system performance. Mathur et al. [43-44-45] 

evaluated that the soil temperature about  of the tube depends on the thermal 

conductivity of soil wherever the soil by a lesser    thermal    conductivity 

will   saturate at the quicker than  to the soil with the greater thermal 

conductivity.  Mushtaq I. Hasan and Sajad  W. Noori .[46] explained  an 

numerical    the influence of some plan and environmental factors ( the 

material  of pipe and  the thickness of pipe wall, moist content of soil,) on 

the overall   performance of an  EAHE  systems. They showed that the 

saturated soil shows the greatest general performance    of EAHEs  

compared with further soils, also the  wall thickness  and tube material no 

significant influence on the overall performance. Agrawal. et al. [47] 

discuss experimentally the influence sub-soil moisture content in hot and 

arid climate to enhance soil thermal properties and its influence on EATHE  

the pipe of  length and thermal performance requisite for selected 

temperature declined for  the summer cooling. They noted that COP and 

the average heat transfer rate improved by 24.0% and 24.1% 

correspondingly for 20% moisture contented at 30 m EATHEs the pipe of  

length than  to  the dry system.  Kamal Kumar A et al. [48] studied  the 

moisture contented and its effect on the pipe of  length and the  performance 

of  thermal  necessary for selected  temperature increase in  the winter 

season. They saw that the coefficient of performance and the average heat 

transfer rise up to     26.1% and    26.0% correspondingly, for 15%  the 

moisture contented at 30  m   length pipe of EAPHE  system as than  to  the 

arid climate. 

3. Affecting parameters: 

3.1. The effect of  flow velocity: 

Bansal et al. [50] numerical study carried out on  the ETHE systems 

through the winter period .From their results  they  proved  that  23.4 m of  

long the earth air thermal heat exchanger system can increase air  of 

temperature for the flow of  speeds of 2–5 m/s in the range from  4.1–4.8 

C°.  Vikas et al [51, 54] ,Sanjeev et al. [34] showed  experimentally and 

numerically the influence of  the air speed on the performance    of   earth  

to air heat exchanger system . Their result found experimentally and 

numerically during summer and winter seasons that the exit  air temperature 

improved with rising  the air  of speed.  Vikas Bansal. et al. [53] presented 

experimentally the effect of the operative parameters (  air of  velocity, the 

pipe materials ) on a performance  of thermal of   EPAHE systems to 

reduction the cooling capacity of  the buildings in summer period. They 

found the air temperature reduce with rise the velocity,  and the 

performance of   coefficient of the system differs from 1.9 to 2.9 for rise in 

speed from 2.0 to 5.0 m/s.  V. Bansal et al.[ 52-56]  performed the numerical 

simulation of cooling capacity and thermal performance of an EAHEs   in  

the hot and dry conditions. They have saw  that   the velocity of air during 

a  pipe buried has been noted  significantly influenced  the    performance   

of the earth  to air heat exchanger  . Mohammad Hossein et al. [ 55] Carried 

out experimentally treatments on  the influence of important parameters, 

counting pipe material  and burial  pipe (pipe of  length, depth,  air 

velocity)and on   the performance   of EAHE systems .They obtained  that 

5.5  of  COP of the system for   cooling   type was greater than 3.5 for 

heating COP of material which is higher for steel than PVC.  Also, the 

differential temperatures were 14.4 C° and 9.4 C° for cooling and heating 

modes . 



MUSHTAQ I. HASAN ,  DHAY  MOHAMMED MUTER /AL-QADISIYAH JOURNAL FOR ENGINEERING SCIENCES   14 (2021) 021–030                                                                                      25 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Figure 3: Schematic of the EAHE piping design. 

Misra et al. [57] Estimate the  variant of derating element of the EAHEs 

because of the influence of the parameters. They results displayed that the 

rise in  the flow  of velocity it causes  decline in thermal performance of 

EAHEs.  Nitish Shrestha1. et al. [28] performance analysis of EAHE at 

different atmospheric conditions observed that in cooling type the inlet 

temperature of the air drops with rise in the pipe length. The temperature 

reduction for a length of 1.2m differs from 1-3 C°  at velocity 6.5m/sec. 

Salman H  et al. [ 39].  studied to show the effect of the tube of  length,  air   

speed , and pipe diameter on the    performance of the air thermal HE system 

in  Basrah . The result have presented that the potential of Earth Tube is 

providing lesser exit temperature of air inside to the area. They discover 

that the temperature at outlet from the buried pipe declines with rising the 

length  of pipe, declining pipe diameter, declining mass flow rates of 

flowing air in the tube and rising depths above to 4.m .Experimental and 

theoretical study have been  by Mohammed Benhammou and  Belkacem 

Draoui [ 58] to show the impact of dynamical and geometrical parameters 

on the  thermal performance of EAHEs the thermal performance of 

(EAHEs) to the  summer cooling in the Algerian Sahara. Their result 

obtained that the air exit temperature declines with rising the length of pipe 

but it rises with rising the velocity of air and pipe cross section , also 

experimental that COP declined quickly with increasing the velocity of air. 

numerical study  by Benhammou et al.  [ 31]  to estimate the thermal of  

performance of earth  to   air heat exchanger system a passing one 

dimensional season below the climate conditions of Algerian Sahara. 

through summer . They noted from the results that the air temperature in 

outlet from the system with pipe length of 30 m is less by 2 ˚C compared 

with 10 m pipe length. Also, they observed that the air temperature in  outlet 

decrease by 1.8 and 1.2 with using 10 cm pipe diameter 30 cm and 1 m/s  

the air  of velocity in place of 3 m/s. Similarly with the found of Krarti et 

al.  [49].  Ahmed et al [59].discussed numerical and an experimental 

investigation about the thermal performance EAHE systems with diverse 

parameters (pipe of  length,  pipe space ,pipe diameter and pipe material) in 

Egyptian weather conditions. The results showed  by using computational 

fluid dynamic saw that the   air   temperature  at exit increases with reduced 

diameter, increasing pipe length and decreasing the flow rate. Sanjeev J et 

al. [34] showed  experiment was through winter season for the influence of 

diverse inside flow velocities, concluded that the best rise in EAHE exit 

temperature at the speed  5m/s compared with velocity at 2.5m/s   and     

3.5m/s. While, Jahkar et al   [60] studied the parametric were done to 

analyses the influence of mass flow rate, radius of buried pipe ,  length  of 

tube and  the material of  pipe on the performance study of a EWHE system. 

They obtained that by an rise in mass flow rate, the temperature  in the outlet 

of EHWE rise .  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Figure 4: schematic diagram of the experimental setup. 

Badgaiyan P et al. [35] estimated the performance of EAHEs with 

several operating parameters was studied. . They proved that thermal 

performance enhanced with increasing the length of  pipe, wherever the 

outlet temperature reduced. Additionally, they concluded that for three 

velocity of air flow (4, 5, and 6 m/s). the less outlet temperature found with 

4 m/s air velocity.   Mushtaq I. Hasan and Sajad W. Noori [61] study a 

numerically the overall performance of the EAHE by five forms of the 

EAHEs channel. They discover that the outlet air temperature reduced 

through the summer and increased through the  winter season period, with 

increasing pipe of  length or declining  the air  of speed, so, they showed 

that there is the circular form gives the greatest general performance since 

it has the smallest pressure drop than by further figures. 

3.2. Effect of length  of pipe: 

      Mihalakakou et al. (1995) [62] discuss the parametrical model in 

which changing parameters were tube radius ,pipe length,  speed of the air 

inlet the pipe and  the buried of depth pipe under  the earth superficies. 

conclude with  increase the velocity the temperature is enhance. Bansal et 

al. [50] numerical study carried out on  the earth air HE systems   through 

the winter periods .From their results  they  proved  that  23.4 m of  long 

the earth air thermal HE systems can increase the air  of temperature for a 

flow of  velocities of 2–5 m/s in the range from  4.1–4.8 °C,.  Maerefat and 

Haghighi [63] ,Pohstiri et al., [65] have advanced a mathematically typical 

based on energy conservation equations and resolved by iterative way to 

find out  the ability of the solar chimney and EAHE system. pipe lengths of 

EAHE must be  used to afford a best thermal security condition less than 

35m .They results showed of the influence of EAHEs tube radius on  the 

system performance exposes that the rise of the EAHEs diameter up to 0.5m 

does not rise the room air temperature. Ascione et al.[64].evaluated the 

energy of performance of the air to conditioned building joined by ground 

heat  exchanger (GHE) in the Italian weather. From their result obtained for 

a 50 m length of ground heat  exchanger pipe was about 14.2 kWh/m2 is 

the maximum major energy  that saving . Mohammad Hossein et al. [ 55] 

Carried out experimentally treatments on  the influence of important 

parameters, counting pipe material  and burial  pipe (pipe of  length, depth,  

air velocities )and on the   performance of an  EAHE systems .They 

obtained  that 5.5  of  COP of the system for cooling style was greater than 

3.5 for heating COP of material which is higher for steel than PVC.  Also, 

the differential temperatures were 14.4◦C and 9.4◦C for cooling and heating 

modes .  academics[66-67] have discovered that the system provide best  

the thermal  of performance with  rising the tube length burying, the  pipe   

at a depth  above   to   3 m, expanding the superficies of a pipe, decreasing 

the tube radius and the air flow rate inlet the tube. Nitish Shrestha1. et al. 

[28] performance analysis of EAHEs at different atmospheric conditions 



26 MUSHTAQ I. HASAN ,  DHAY  MOHAMMED MUTER /AL-QADISIYAH JOURNAL FOR ENGINEERING SCIENCES   14 (2021) 021–030 

 

 

observed that in cooling style the inlet temperature of the air drops with rise 

in the tube length. The temperature reduction for the  length of 1.2m differs 

from 1-3 C° at velocity 6.5m/sec. Experimental and theoretical study have 

been  by Mohammed Benhammou and  Belkacem Draoui [ 58] to show the 

influence of dynamical and geometrical parameters on the thermal  

performance of EAHEs the  thermal   performance of (EAHEs) for summer 

cooling during the Algerian Sahara region. Their result concluded that the 

air exit temperature declines with rising  the length of pipe, then it   

increased with   increasing the velocity of air and pipe  cross  section , also 

experimental that the   coefficient   of performance declined fast with   rises  

the velocity of air. numerical study  by Benhammou et al. [ 31]  to estimate 

the thermal of  performance of earth to   air heat   exchanger system a 

passing one dimensional season below the climate conditions of Algerian 

Sahara. through summer . They noted that the air temperature in outlet from 

the system with pipe length of 30 m is less by 2 ˚C compared with 10 m 

pipe length. Also, they observed that the air temperature in  outlet decrease 

by 1.8 and 1.2 with using 10 cm pipe diameter 30 cm and 1 m/s  the air  of 

velocity in place of 3 m/s. Similarly with the found of[49] .  Ahmed et al  

[59] discussed numerical and experimentally investigation about  the 

thermal  performance of  EAHEs   with    parameters (pipe of   length , pipe 

space ,pipe diameter and pipe material) in Egyptian weather conditions. The 

results showed  by using computational fluid dynamic observed that the   air    

temperature  at exit  increases with reduced diameter, increasing tube length 

and decreasing the flow rate. Jahkar et al   [67] studied the parametric were 

done to analyses the influence of mass flow rates, radius of buried tube , 

pipe length and pipe substance on the performance analysis of the EWHEs. 

They obtained that with the  rise in mass flow rate, the temperature  in the 

outlet of EHWEs    rises. While  [76] showed  experiment was through 

winter season for the influence of diverse inside flow velocities, concluded 

that the best growth in  EAHE exit temperature at the velocity   5m/s   than    

to velocity at    2.5m/s   and   3.5m/s.   Badgaiyan P et al. [35] estimated the 

performance of EAHE with several working parameters was studied. They 

proved that thermal performance enhanced with increasing the length of  

pipe, wherever the outlet temperature reduced. Additionally, they 

concluded that for three velocity of air flow (4, 5, and 6 m/s). the less outlet 

temperature found with 4 m/s air velocity.. Mushtaq I. Hasan and Sajajd W. 

Noori .[61] study a numerically the general performance of the   EAHE   by 

five forms of the earth air heat exchanger channel. They discovered that the 

exit air temperature reduced through the summer and increased through the  

winter period, with rising the pipe of  length or declining  the air  of velocity, 

so, they established that there is the circular form gives the greatest general 

performance since it has the smallest pressure of   drop compared by further 

figures.. Agrawal. et al. [48]studied experimentally the influence sub-soil 

humidity content in hot and arid climate to improve soil thermal properties 

and its influence on EATHE  the tube of  length and thermal performance 

requisite for selected temperature declined for  the summer cooling. , COP 

and the average heat transfer rate improved by 24.0% and 24.1% 

correspondingly for 20% moisture contented at 30 m EATHE the pipe of  

length as compared to  the arid system.  Mushtaq I. Hasan and Sajad W. 

Noori [46] studied numerically the effect of the parameters (inside 

condition, pipe diameter, pipe length, and exit condition) on the general 

performance of the EAHEs .They pretend results presented that  the  EAHE 

systems with pipe radius ( 6 in) has the best values of general performance. 

Then, the diameter of pipe more suitable is 2 in  from the   thermal   of 

performance point   of overview. 

3.3. Effect of  diameter of  pipe: 

   Mihalakakou et al. (1995) [62] discuss the  parametrical typical in 

which changing parameters    were    pipe radius ,pipe length,   speed of the 

air inlet the cylinder and  the buried of depth pipe under  the ground 

superficies. conclude with  increase the velocity the   temperature is 

enhance.. Maerefat and Haghighi [63], Pohstiri et al. [65] have advanced 

the  mathematical typical based on energy conservation equations and 

resolved by iterative way to find out the ability of the solar chimney and 

EAHE system. pipe lengths of EAHE must be used to afford a best thermal 

security condition less than 35m .They results showed of the influence of 

EAHE system  tube radius on  the system  of performance exposes that the 

rise of the EAHEs diameter   above to   0.5m does not rise the area    air 

temperature .academics [66,67] have discovered that the system provide 

best  the thermal  of performance by rising the tube length burying, the tube 

at the   depth   up to 3 m, expanding the superficies  of the pipe, decreasing 

the tube diameter and the air flow rates inlet the pipe.  G.N. Tiwari et al. 

[69] experimentally estimate thermal conductivity of the soil, earth - to   air    

heat exchanger    system    has been planned ,measurement of room with 

improved values of radius of pipe, length of pipe, number of air variations, 

and depth at which( HE).  They  observed that the exit     air temperature a 

reduction of 5 – 6 C° in summer for the   number of 5 air variants with 0.10 

m and 21 m enhanced diameter and length of pipe correspondingly. Salman 

H  et al. [ 39] studied to investigate the impact of   the pipe of    length, air      

velocity , and   pipe diameter on performance of the air thermal HE system 

in Basrah . The result have presented that the potential of Earth Tube is 

providing lesser outside temperature of air inside to the area. They discover 

that the temperature at outlet from the buried       pipe declines with rising 

the length  of    pipe , declining pipe radius, declining mass flow rates of  

the flowing air in the     tube and rising   depths above        to 4m.  Numerical 

study  by Benhammou et al. [ 31]  to estimate the thermal of  performance 

of earth air HE system a passing one dimensional season below the climate 

conditions of Algerian Sahara. through summer . They noted from the 

results that the air temperature in outlet from the system with pipe length of 

30 m is less by 2 ˚C compared with 10 m pipe length. Also, they observed 

that the air temperature in  outlet decrease by 1.8 and 1.2 with using 10 cm 

pipe diameter 30 cm and 1 m/s  the air  of velocity in place of 3 m/s. 

Similarly with the found of [49]. Ahmed et al . [59] discussed numerical 

and experimentally  investigation about the thermal performance of  the 

EAHE     system with diverse parameters (    pipe length , pipe space ,pipe 

diameter and pipe material) in Egyptian weather conditions. The results 

showed  by using computational fluid dynamic  saw that the   air    

temperature  at outlet increases with reduced radius, increasing tube length 

and decreasing the flow rate. Jahkar et al.  [68] studied the parametric were 

done to analyses the influence of mass    flow    rate, diameter of buried 

tube , pipe length and tube of   material on the performance   enquiry of     

the EWHE system . They obtained that with an rise in mass flow rates, the 

temperature  in the outlet of EHWE rises . While [76] showed  experiment 

was through winter season for the influence of diverse inlet flow velocity, 

concluded that the batter growth in EAHE exit temperature at the velocity 

5m/s than  to the  speed    at 2.5m/s    and     3.5m/s.  Mushtaq I. Hasan and 

Sajad W. Noori [48] studied numerically the influence of the parameters 

(inside condition, pipe diameter, pipe length, and exit condition) on the 

general performance of the earth air heat exchanger( EAHE) system .They 

simulated result presented that the EAHE systems by pipe diameter ( 6 in) 

has the better values of general performance. Then, the diameter of tube 

more suitable is 2 in  from  the thermal performance point    of   overview. 



MUSHTAQ I. HASAN ,  DHAY  MOHAMMED MUTER /AL-QADISIYAH JOURNAL FOR ENGINEERING SCIENCES   14 (2021) 021–030                                                                                      27 

 

 

3.4.  Effect of pipe of  thickness: 

   Mushtaq I. Hasan and Sajad W. Noori (2018)[70]  explained  an 

numerical the influence of specific design and environmental factors     

(pipe material and thickness of tube wall, moist content of soil,) on the 

overall performance of the  earth to air heat exchangers. they showed that 

the saturated soil displays the greatest general performance of EAHEs than  

by   other soils, also the  wall thickness  and pipe material no significant 

influence on the overall performance.  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Figure 5: Schematic of EAHE system 

Mushtaq I.    Hasan and Sajad W.   Noori..[71] studied numerically the 

effect of wall thickness and tube material on the overall performance of 

EAHEs . Their results noted the more suitable to use is  PVC pipe  because 

it is non-corrosive and less cost compared with steel pipe. The influence of 

wall thickness on the overall performance is less and can be neglected. 

3.5. Effect of  pipe material: 

  Vikas Bansal. et al.  [72] discuss experimentally the influence of the 

operative parameters ( the air  velocity, the tube material) on the thermal 

performance of   EPAHE systems to decrease the cooling capacity of  the 

buildings in summer. they found the air temperature reduce with rise the 

speed,   and the COP of the system differs from    1.9 to    2.9 for rise in  the 

velocity of    2.0 to    5.0  m/s. In addition  the maximum rises in temperature 

for steel and PVC pipes are    10.3  and   12.7 8C correspondingly. V. Bansal 

et al. [52-56]  performed the numerical simulation of cooling capacity and 

thermal performance of EAHEs  in  the warm and dry conditions. They 

have observed  that the performance of the EAHEs is not significantly 

influenced  by the material of a pipe buried, while the velocity of air during 

a pipe buried has been noted  significantly influenced  the     performance      

of the EAHEs . Mohammad Hossein et al. [ 55] Carried  experimentally 

treatments the influence of important parameters, counting pipe material  

and burial  pipe (pipe length, depth,  air velocity ) and on the performance 

of the EAHE system.  They discovered  that 5.5  of  COP of the system to   

cooling mode was greater than 3.5 for    heating  COP of material which is 

higher for steel than PVC.  Also, the differential temperatures were 14.4◦C 

and 9.4◦C for cooling and heating types . Hatraf et al. [73] have studied the 

parameters effectiveness the performance of  EAHE during  

experimentation and modeling. They have done design using the  simple 

typical varied some and the supply of the air temperature. they found  was 

that the pipe of  material has no influence on a  performance of the HE, 

which    is arrangement by   the found of Bansal et. al [52]. Serageldin et 

al., [75] calculated the     thermal of   performance of the  EAHEs used to  

cooling and    heating in the Egyptian climate conditions. They have 

advanced the   mathematical typical founded    on unsteady,   one 

dimensional,   quasi to state for energy conservation equation Three  diverse 

kinds of pipe  material were used , specifically steel , PVC and  the copper. 

The exit air   of    temperature was  19.7 °C    in     PVC  tube, and   19.8   

°C for together copper and    steel correspondingly. So, it is established that 

the difference in  the exit air temperature for many pipe material is also 

lesser  and later it is negligible. Mushtaq I. Hasan and Sajad W. Noori [ 70] 

, Mohd, Noor A et al. [74] explained  a numerical   the influence   of   certain   

design and environmental factors (tube material and  thickness of pipe wall, 

moist content of soil,) on the overall performance of the earth to air heat 

exchangers  systems in Nasiriyah town in southern of Iraq. they showed 

that the saturated soil displays the greatest general performance of EAHEs  

than  with further   soils   , also the  wall thickness  and pipe material   no 

significant influence on the overall performance. Mushtaq I.  Hasan and  

Sajad W. Noori.[71] studied numerically the influence of wall    thickness   

and tube material on the general performance of EAHE. The results showed 

the more suitable to use is  PVC pipe  because it is non-corrosive and less 

cost  compared with steel pipe. The influence of wall thickness on the 

overall performance is less and can be neglected, The pressure drop and the 

exit air temperature for the two materials improved with rising the velocity 

of air. 

3.6. Effect of pipe depth buried underground: 

 Pfafferot.[75] and Pfafferot et al.  [76] studied  the average of  yearly 

temperature   profile   at   depths of 1 m, 2 m, 4 m and 8 m. They results 

presented that the temperature at depths of 4 and 8 m was stable during the 

time in the range of 9 to 13°C. Cucumo et al. [77] explained the effect of  

the burial  pipe depth on the performance of  earth to air  heat     exchanger  

systems. The   model  allowable also to calculate the temperature of air inlet 

the tube and of soil nearby the buried pipe, taking into description the 

thermal perturbation of greater free superficies and the possible phase 

change (concentration) in the   buried   pipes. A like model     was advanced 

by  Su et al. [78] for discuss the thermal performance of EAHEs  used for   

the  building energy saving.   Mohammad Hossein et al. [55] Carried 

experimentally treatments the influence of important parameters, counting 

pipe material  and burial  pipe (pipe   length, depth,  air    speed) and on the 

performance of an   EAHE.  They discovered  that 5.5  of  COP of the 

system for  the   cooling   style    was greater than 3.5       for    heating COP 

of material which is higher for steel than PVC.  Also, the differential   

temperatures were 14.4◦C and 9.4◦C for cooling and heating modes. 

Academics [66,67] have discovered that a    system    provides best  the 

thermal  of performance by rising the    pipe    length     burying, the pipe at 

a depth up to 3 m, expanding the superficies of the pipe,  decreasing    the   

pipe diameter and the air flow rates inlet the pipe.  Mushtaq I. Hasan and  

Sajad W.  Noori.[79] thesis discussed a numerical study about the potential 

decrease in the request of energy and the overall performance of (EAHE) 

systems   for heating   and    cooling of the house buildings by EAHE system 

of  southern of Iraq in Nasiriyah city. they showed that more appropriate to 

use is the EAHE system of case 2 compared with case 1 and case 3 II 

(consist of one layer buried with 3 m depth  of EAHE system and the EHAE 

of this case3 II  buried with depth of 4 m ) with saving in energy 17.84% of 

winter at January months and 9.33 % of summer months at August month.  

 



28 MUSHTAQ I. HASAN ,  DHAY  MOHAMMED MUTER /AL-QADISIYAH JOURNAL FOR ENGINEERING SCIENCES   14 (2021) 021–030 

 

 

4.The disadvantages. of this application: 

1. Possibility of Depletion of Geothermal Sources.   

2. High Investment Costs for Geothermal System.  

3. Land Requirements for Geothermal System to Be Installed. 

4. environmental Concerns about Greenhouse Emissions. 

5. Conclusions: 

       The EAHE is one of the systems that can be used for decreasing 

energy consumed in buildings ,thermal performance of the EAHE depends 

on several chief influences such as under  earth temperature difference, plan 

and specification of the EAHE pipe, the following conclusions can be 

decided: 

1.Thermal performance improved with using finned pipe wherever the air 

temperature  was recorded drop about 20.5 ˚C compared with 17.7 C° when 

the pipe is finless 

2. The  wall thickness  and pipe material   no significant influence on the 

overall performance 

3. The effect of EAHE system  tube diameter on  the system  of performance 

exposes that the rise of the EAHEs diameter 

lead to increase in area of pipe that it cause increase in temperature outside 

of pipe and it cause decrease in pressure drop. 

4. The EAHEs   had the ability to decrease home cooling energy request 

through the summer season by 30%. 

5. The increase in length of pipe of EAHE lead to decline in  the temperature 

interning to the poultry houses, then it   increased with   increasing the 

velocity of air and pipe  cross  section. 

REFERENCES: 

[1] B-M D, B.D, and R .Singh, Study of a Balastic Clay. GeoFrontiers ,( 42)(2011) 

480-487. 

[2] M. Yusof, S. Anuar And H. Ibrahim .A review of ground heat exchangers for 

application in The malaysian climate T. Journal Of Mechanical Engineering And 

Sciences (Jmes),( 8) (2015) 1426-1439. 

[3] O. W. and C. Akubuo, .Trombe wall system for poultry brooding. International 

journal of poultry science, 6(2)(2007) 125-130.  

[4] A. M., R .Belarbi,., N .Bouaziz , & F. Allard,. Poultry housing in the Arab World: 

applying principles of thermal exchange to improve performance (A case study 

of Morocco). Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture, 20 (1) (2008) 60-75. 

 [5] Choi, H. C., Salim, H. M., N. Akter, Na, J. C., Kang, H. K., M. J. Kim, & O. S. 

Suh,. Effect of heating system using a geothermal heat pump on the production 

performance and housing environment of broiler chickens. Poultry 

science,  91(2) (2012) 275-281. 

 [6] Fawaz, H., Abiad, M. G., Ghaddar, N., & Ghali, K. Solar-assisted localized 

ventilation system for poultry brooding. Energy and Buildings,  71 (2014) 142-

154.  

[7] J. Kapica, , H . Pawlak, & M .Ścibisz,. Carbon dioxide emission reduction by 

heating poultry houses from renewable energy sources in Central 

Europe. Agricultural Systems, 139(2015) 238-249. 

 [8] A. Laknizi, A. ElMaakoul,., A. Abdellah. B., M Bouya,., Dhimdi, S., & S. Said,. 

Evaluation of earth-air heat exchanger for cooling and heating a poultry house: 

case study in Morocco. In 2015 3rd International Renewable and Sustainable 

Energy Conference (IRSEC) December IEEE. (2015) 1-5. 

[9] A .Laknizi, M .Mahdaoui, K. Anoune, M .Bakhouya, , A. Abdellah,. B, & H 

.Oussous. Parametric Study and Energy Performance of an Earth-Air Heat 

Exchanger for a Poultry House in Morocco. International Journal of Renewable 

Energy Research (IJRER), 8(4) ( 2018) 2047-2056. 

 [10 ] W. Morshed, , L. Leso, L .Conti, G. Rossi, S. Simonini, & M .Barbari. Cooling 

performance of earth-to-air heat exchangers applied to a poultry barn in semi-

desert areas of south Iraq. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological 

Engineering,  11(3) ( 2018) 47-53. 

[11] M .Sodha, S. R. L Sawhney, B. C. Jayashankar, & A. K. Sharma, Effect of 

different earth surface treatments on the thermal performance of a room coupled 

to an earth‐air tunnel. International journal of energy research,  14(3)(1990)  337-

354.  

 [12] G .Sharan, & R .Jadhav. Soil Temperatures Regime at Ahmedabad. IIMA 

Working Paper No.WP 2002-11-02, Research and Publication DepartmentIndian 

Institute of Management. 2002.  

[13] F. Al-Ajmi, D. L. Loveday, & V. I. Hanby. The cooling potential of earth–air heat 

exchangers for domestic buildings in a desert climate. Building and 

Environment,  41( 3)(2006) 235-244,  

[14] M.K. Ghosal and G.N.Tiwari,“Modeling and parametric studies for thermal 

performance of an earth to air heat exchanger integrated with a 

greenhouse”,Energy Conversion and Management, 47( 13–14)(2006) 1779-

1798. 

[15] M. K. Ghosal , S. Nayak, & G.N.Tiwari, .Modeling and experimental study for 

winter performance of an earth to air heat exchanger: An alternative energy 

source for greenhouse. Agricultural Engineering International: CIGR Journal, the 

CIGR Ejournal. Manuscript. January 5(2008) 1-14 . 

[16] A. Chel, & G. N. Tiwari, Performance evaluation and life cycle cost analysis of 

earth to air heat exchanger integrated with adobe building for New Delhi 

composite climate. Energy and Buildings, 41(1)( 2009) 56-66. 

[17] A .Ahmed, I.p, K., A Miller, & K Gidado, (, July). Thermal performance of earth-

air heat exchanger for reducing cooling energy demand of office buildings in the 

United Kingdom. In 11th Conference of international building performance 

simulation association , l (2009) 2228-2235.  

[18] V. Bansal, R..Misra, G. D. Agrawal, & J .Mathur. Performance analysis of earth–

pipe–air heat exchanger for summer cooling. Energy and buildings,  42(5 )( 

2010) 645-648,. 

[19] J .Mohammad, C .Uddin, S. Bodius & Md. Akefur Rahman..An experimental  

analysis of a horizontal earth to air heat exchanger (ETAHE) system for hot 

climatic condition of Bangladesh. Proceedings of the International Conference 

on Mechanical Engineering and Renewable Energy, 24 ( 11)( 2015) 26 – 29. 

[20] J .Vaz, Sattler, M. A., dos Santos, E. D., & L. A. Isoldi,. Experimental and 

numerical analysis of an earth–air heat exchanger. Energy and Buildings,  43(9)( 

2011) 2476-2482.  

[21] V. Khalajzadeh, M .Farmahini-Farahani, & G. A .Heidarinejad, Novel integrated 

system of ground heat exchanger and indirect evaporative cooler. Energy and 

Buildings,  49(2012) 604-610,. 

[22] A .Tudor, & V. Badescu, The influence of several parameters on the performance 

of earth to air heat exchangers in South-Eastern European climates. UPB Sci 

Bull,  75 (3) (2013) 85-96.  

[23] L. Ramirez-Davila, J. Xaman, J. Arce, G. Álvarez, I. Hernandez-Perez, 

Numerical study of earth-to-air heat exchanger for three different climates, 

Energy Build. Vol. 76(2014) 238–248. 

[24] Li . Haorong, Yu .Yuebin, Niu. Fuxin , Michel Shafik , Bing Chen. .Performance 

of a coupled cooling system with earth-to-air heat exchanger and solar chimney 

. Renewable Energy, 62(2014) 468-477. 



MUSHTAQ I. HASAN ,  DHAY  MOHAMMED MUTER /AL-QADISIYAH JOURNAL FOR ENGINEERING SCIENCES   14 (2021) 021–030                                                                                      29 

 

 

[25] T. Bisoniya, S., A Kumar, & P .Baredar. Heating potential evaluation of earth–

air heat exchanger system for winter season. Journal of Building Physics,  39( 3) 

(2015) 242-260. 

[26] T. Bisoniya, S., A Kumar, & P .Baredar .Cooling potential evaluation of earth-air 

heat exchanger system for summer season. Int J Eng Tech Res,  2(.4) (2014) 309-

316.  

[27] G. N. Tiwari, V. Singh, P .Joshi, Deo, A., & A. Gupta, Design of an earth air heat 

exchanger (EAHE) for climatic condition of Chennai, India. Open 

Environmental Sciences,  8(1)(2014) 24-34. 

[28] N. Shrestha & A. A .Kumari. Performance Analysis of a Finned Pipe Earth Air 

Heat Exchanger International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR),  4 

(10)(2015) 109-113. 

[29] S.Jakhar, , R .Misra, , V Bansal,., & Soni, M. S. Thermal performance 

investigation of earth air tunnel heat exchanger coupled with a solar air heating 

duct for northwestern India. Energy and Buildings,  87(2015) 360-369.  

[30] A. Thakur, and A. Sharma, CFD Analysis of Earth-Air Heat Exchanger to 

Evaluate the Effect of Parameters on Its Performance. IOSR Journal of 

Mechanical and Civil Engineering (IOSR-JMCE), 5(1) (2015) 14- 19. 

[31] M. Benhammou, & B. Draoui, Parametric study on thermal performance of earth-

to-air heat exchanger used for cooling of buildings. Renewable and Sustainable 

Energy Reviews, 44 (2015) 348-355. 

[32] H. Dubey, B. Kosthi & K. Choudhary. performance analysis of earth tube heat 

exchanger. International Journal of Engineering Sciences & Research 

Technology. July.  5(7) ( 2016) 323-331. 

[33] M. Anuj . K. S .Ankit, M .Sanjay. "Numerical investigation of the performance 

and soil temperature recovery of an EATHE system under intermittent 

operations", Journal ofRenewable Energy, 95(2016) 510-521. 

[34] J. Sanjeev, M. Rohit, M.S. S, G. Nikhil. Parametric simulation and experimental 

analysis of earth air heat exchanger with solar air heating duct. J Eng Sci Technol. 

19(2016)1059-1066,. 

[35] P. Badgaiyan,. and , S. Agrawal. CFD Base Performance Evaluation of Earth-Air 

Tube Heat Exchanger for Natural Air Conditioning. Invention Journal of 

Research Technology in Engineering & Management, 1 (1) (2016) 01-05 

[36] H. Omar, B. Abdelhafid, M. Nouredine & N. Hamza. Experimental study of the 

performance of an earth to air heat exchanger located in arid zone during the 

summer period .International Journal of Heat and Technology, December, 36( 4)  

(2018) 1323-1329. 

[37] S.Nasreddine , M. Younes,  J. Ali  Chamkha, Lo Giulio , A.Houari  , K. 

Noureddine  & Mohammed B. Experimental study of an earth-to-air heat 

exchanger coupled to the solar chimney for heating and cooling applications 

in arid regions. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry.  June,8( 2020). 

[38]  M. I. Hasan  and S.W. Noori . Astudy of the potential of using the Earth to air 

heat exchanger for cooling and heating of residential buildings in Iraq. Heat 

Transfer—Asian Research, (2019) 1–26.  

[39] H. Salman. Hammadi  & Alaa Hlaichi Mohammed..Application of Earth Tube 

Heat Exchanger and Solar Chimney for Natural Cooling System in Basrah City. 

Basrah Journal for Engineering Sciences, 14 (2014)  23–32. 

[40] V.M. Puri,. Heat and mass transfer analysis and modeling in unsaturated ground 

soils for buried tube systems. Energy Agric. https://doi.org/10.1016/ 0167-

5826(87)90001-5, 6(1987) 179–193,..  

[41]M. Santamouris, G. Mihalakakou, D. Asimakopoulos, J.O. Lewis, On the 

application of the energy balance equation to predict ground temperature profiles, 

Solar Energy 60 (3/4) (1997) 181–190. 

[42] P .Clara, A. Zarrella, M .Decarli, R .Zecchin. The design and environmental 

evaluation of earth-to-air heat exchangers (EAHE). J Renew Sust Energ Rev,  

28(2013) 16-107. 

[43] L.  Ramírez-Dávila, J .Xamán, J. Arce, G .Álvarez ,I. Hernández-Pérez . 

"Numerical study of earth-to-air heat exchanger for three different climates", 

Journal of Energy Build, 76(2014) 238-248. 

[44 ]A. Mathur, A .Srivastava, J .Mathur, S .Mathur, GD. Agrawal. Transient effect 

of soil thermal diffusivity on performance of EATHE system. Energ Rep, 

1(2015)17-21,. 

[45] A. Mathur, A .Srivastava, GD. Agrawal, S.Mathur, J. Mathur. CFD analysis of 

EATHE system under transient conditions for intermittent operation. J Energ 

Build. 87( 12)  (2015) 37-44. 

[46] M. I. Hasan and S. W. Noori.. Evaluating the influence of some design and 

environmental parameters on the performance of earth to air heat exchanger. 

Journal of Engineering and Sustainable Development, 22(2) (Part -1) (2018)10–

29. 

[47] Agra, K. K. Gha. Agrawal, R. Misra, M. Bhardwaj and D. K.Jamuwa,“A review 

on effect of geometrical, flow and soil properties on the performance of Earth air 

tunnel heat exchanger”. Energy and Buildings, 176(2018)120-138. 

[48] A. K. K., Yadav, T., R. Misra, & Agrawal, G. D. Effect of soil moisture contents 

on thermal performance of earth-air-pipe heat exchanger for winter heating in 

arid climate: In situ measurement. Geothermics,  77(2019)12-23.  

[49] M. Krarti and J. F .Kriede. Analytical model for heat transfer in an Underground 

air tunnel, Energy Conservation and Management 37 (10) (1996) 1567-1574. 

[50] V. Bansal, R., Misra, Agrawal, G.D., J. Mathur, Performance analysis of earth 

pipe air heat exchanger for winter heating. Energy Build, 41(2009) 1151–1154. 

[51] B.Vikas, M .Rohit, D .GhanshyamA, M. Jyotirmay "Performance analysis of 

earth–pipe–air heat exchanger for winter heating", Journal of Energy and 

buildings, 42 (2009) 1151-1154,  

[52] V. Bansal, R. Misra, G.D. Agrawal, J. Mathur. Performance analysis of earth-

pipe-air heat exchanger for summer cooling. Energy and Buildings, 42(2010)  

645-648.  

[53] V. Bansal, R. Misra, Gh. Das Agrawal, J. Mathur,. Performance analysis of earth–

pipe–air heat exchanger for summer cooling. Energy and Buildings, Vol. 42 , 

pp.645–648, 2010. 

[54] V. B., R. M., Ghanshyam D. A, J.yotirmay M., "Performance analysis of earth–

pipe–air heat exchanger for winter cooling", Journal of Energy and buildings, 41( 

2010) 645-648. 

[55] M. Hossein Abbaspour-Fard, A. Gholami, and M. Khojastehpour. Evaluation of 

an Earth-to-Air Heat Exchanger for the North-East of Iran with Semi-Arid 

Climate. International Journal of Green Energy , 8(2011)  499–510. 

 

[56] V .Bansal, R Mishra, GD .Agarwal, J.Mathur. Performance analysis of integrated 

earth-air-tunnelevaporative cooling system in hot and dry climate. Energy and 

Buildings , 47(2012) 525-532. 

[57] R. Misra, V. Bansal, GD .Agrawal, J. Mathur, Aseri TK. CFD analysis based 

parametric study of derating factor for earth air tunnel heat exchanger. Appl 

Energy, 103(2013) 266–77.  

[58] M. Benhammou and B. Draoui . Parametric study on thermal performance of 

earth-to-air heat exchanger used for cooling of buildings. Renewable and 

Sustainable Energy Reviews, 44(2015) 348–355. 

[59] A .Ahmed. S., Ali K. A, O .Shinichi. "Earth-Air Heat Exchanger thermal 

performance in Egyptian conditions: Experimental results, mathematical model, 

and Computational Fluid Dynamics simulation", Journal of Energy Conversion 

and Management,  122 (2016) 25-38. 



30 MUSHTAQ I. HASAN ,  DHAY  MOHAMMED MUTER /AL-QADISIYAH JOURNAL FOR ENGINEERING SCIENCES   14 (2021) 021–030 

 

 

[60] S. Jakhar, R .Misra, M .Soni and N .Gakkhar, Parametric simulation and 

experimental analysis of earth air heat exchanger with solar air heating duct. 

Engineering Science and Technology,( 2016 )1059-1066. 

[61] M. I.Hasan, S. W.Noori. Numerical investigation of earth to air heat exchanger 

for residential air conditioning with different channel shapes. In press, Proc. Of 

the 3 rd Int. Sci. Conf. (14-15/march/2018)  

[62] G. Mihalakakou, M. Santamouris, D. Asimakopoulos, I. Tselepidaki, Parametric 

prediction of the buried pipes cooling potential for passive cooling applications, 

Solar Energy, 55 (3) (1995)163–173. 

[63] M .Maerefat and A P .Haghighi, Passive cooling of buildings by using integrated 

earth to air heat exchanger and solar chimney. Renewable Energy, (2010) 2316-

2324,  . 

[64] F. Ascione, L. Bellia, F .Minichiello. Earth-to-air heat exchangers for Italian 

climates. Renewable Energy, 36(2011) 2177-88.  

[65] A. H. Poshtiri, N. Gilani, & F. Zamiri, Feasibility study on using solar chimney 

and earth-to-air heat exchanger for natural heating of buildings. In World 

Renewable Energy Congress-Sweden; 8-13 May;; Linköping; Sweden (No. 

Linköping University Electronic Press, November , 57(2011) 1773-1780 

 [66] G A .Florides, P. Christodoulides, P. Pouloupatis. An analysis of heat flow 

through a borehole heat exchanger validated model. Applied Energy, 92(2012) 

523–533. 

[67] S K .Soni, M .Pandey, V N. Bartaria. Ground coupled heat exchangers: A review 

and applications. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 47(2015) 83–92. 

[68] L. Ramírez-Dávila, Xamán J, J .Arce, G. Álvarez, I. Hernández-Pérez, 

"Numerical study of earth-to-air heat exchanger for three different climates", 

Journal of Energy Build, 76 (2014)  48-238. 

[69] G.N. Tiwari , Vikram Singh, Poonam Joshi, Shyam, Arjun Deo, Prabhakant and 

Agam Gupta. Design of an Earth Air Heat Exchanger (EAHE) for Climatic 

Condition of Chennai, India. Open Environmental Sciences , 8(2014) 24-34. 

[70] M I. Hasan and S W. Noori. Evaluating the influence of some design and 

environmental parameters on the performance of earth to air heat exchanger. 

Journal of Engineering and Sustainable Development , 22 (2)(Part -1)(2018) 10–

29. 

[71] M. I.Hasan and  S W  Noori. Numerical Investigation of Earth to Air Heat 

Exchanger for Cooling and Heating Applications. Proc. Of the 3 rd Int. Sci. 

Conf(14-15/march). Southern Technical University,  2018. 

[72] N. Hatraf, , F. Chabane, A. Brima, N.Moummi, & A. Moummi. Parametric study 

of to design an earth to air heat exchanger with experimental 

validation. Engineering journal,  18(2) (2014) 41-54. 

[73] N. A. M. Ariffin,., A. N. Z., Sanusi, & A. M. Noor, Materials for the Earth Air 

Pipe Heat Exchanger (EAPHE) System as a Passive Cooling Technology for Hot-

Humid Climate. Abstract  of International Conference on Emerging Trends in 

Scientific Research , Pearl International Hotel (Kuala Lumpur) , 2(2014) 1-19. 

[74] A .Serageldin, A K. Abdelrahman and S .Okawara, Earth-Air Heat Exchanger 

thermal performance in Egyptian conditions: Experimantal results, mathematical 

model, and Computational Fluid Dynamics simulation. Energy Conversion and 

Management, 122(2016) 25-38. 

[75] J .Pfafferott. Evaluation of earth-to-air heat exchangers with a standardised 

method to calculate energy efficiency. Energy and Buildings,35(2003) 971-83. 

[76] J .Pfafferott, S .Walker-Hertkorn, B .Sanner. Ground cooling: Recent Progress. 

In: Santamouris M, editor. Advances in Passive Cooling. London: EarthScan,  67 

(2007) 190-227. 

[77] M. Cucumo, S.Cucumo, L. Montoro, & A. Vulcano, A one-dimensional transient 

analytical model for earth-to-air heat exchangers, taking into account 

condensation phenomena and thermal perturbation from the upper free surface as 

well as around the buried pipes. International Journal of Heat and Mass 

Transfer,  51(.3-4) (2008)506-516. 

[78] Su, H., Liu, X. B., Ji, L., & Mu, J. Y. A numerical model of a deeply buried air–

earth–tunnel heat exchanger. Energy and Buildings,  48(2012) 233-239.  

[79]  M. I. Hasan  and S W. Noori. Study the potential of using earth to air  heat 

exchanger for cooling and heating of the residual building in Iraq. A Thesis 

Submitted to the Department of Mechanical Engineering, College of 

Engineering, Thi-Qar University, 2018.