300 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times book review the politics of genocide by edward s. herman and david peterson. new york: monthly review press, 2010. $12.95; paper. isbn: 978-1-58367-212-9. pages: 159. reviewed by: matthew nelson1 while genocide commonly refers to the killing or attempted killing of an entire ethnic group or people, its definition is highly controversial and the subject of extensive debate. the term is often used to describe diverse forms of direct or indirect killing, which has resulted in its “frequency of use and recklessness of application” over the past several decades (103). in the politics of genocide, herman and peterson argue that while members of the western establishment and news media have rushed to denounce bloodbaths in bosnia-herzegovina, rwanda, kosovo, and darfur, they have largely remained silent over war crimes and mass atrocities committed by allied regimes in southeast asia, central america, the middle east, and sub-saharan africa. as noam chomsky suggests in the foreword to the book, since the end of the cold war, we have witnessed the emergence of an era of virtual “holocaust denial” or “genocide denial with a vengeance” (7-9). in substantiating their argument, herman and peterson draw on years of meticulous research, careful documentation and in-depth, empirical analysis of atrocities and bloodbaths around the world. the authors have done an excellent job at exposing the double standards of the us news media and its hypocritical system of propaganda. in this sense, the politics of genocide offers a needed corrective to those who manipulate and abuse the genocide label for the purposes of promoting the expansion of imperial power interests around the globe. similar to herman’s past work, however, the book offers less in the way of a theoretical addition to debates surrounding the nature of genocide and imperialism, instead providing a series of well-documented case studies. like the five ‘filters’ in herman and chomsky’s manufacturing consent, the phenomenon of genocide is simply classified through four categories—in this case, of bloodbaths. moreover, while herman and 1  matthew nelson is a ph.d. candidate at the department of political science, carleton university (ottawa, canada). book review: the politics of genocide | 301 peterson, like chomsky, do perceive imperialism fundamentally in race and class terms, their use of terms such as ‘elite’ and western ‘establishment’ rather than class or ruling class tends to obscure the real material links between genocide, capitalism and western imperialism. for herman and peterson, “a remarkable degree of continuity stretches across the many decades of bribes and threats, economic sanctions, subversion, terrorism, aggression, and occupation ordered-up by the policymaking elite of the united states” (13). after the us emerged from the second world war in a dominant economic, political and military position, it had to confront numerous nationalist upheavals in former colonial areas by peoples seeking “independence, self-determination and better lives” (14). to counter these increasingly popular demands for improvement in living standards, the us supported a series of dictatorships in countries like indonesia, south vietnam and chile. although these “national security” states were “torture-prone” and “deeply undemocratic,” they helped improve the overall climate of capitalist investment by keeping their majorities fearful and atomized (14). when local dictators failed, direct us military intervention often followed, as illustrated in the cases of vietnam, and more recently, in iraq and afghanistan. the authors draw on the framework for analyzing mass killings provided by chomsky, and herman himself in their counter-revolutionary violence: bloodbaths in fact and propaganda (crv), first published in 1973. in this work, herman and chomsky conclude that it is obvious and demonstrable that us officials, with the help of the established media, would engage in “atrocities management,” by producing incessant propaganda to deflect attention away from us-approved violence, and onto its enemies. in its framework of analysis, crv provided four categories of bloodbaths: “constructive,” “benign,” “nefarious,” and “mythical” (a sub-category under nefarious). as herman and peterson explain, “[t]hose bloodbaths carried out by the united states itself or that serve immediate and major us interests are constructive; those carried out by allies or clients are benign; and those carried out by us target states are nefarious and (sometimes) mythical” (16). in essence, instances of mass violence are evaluated differently by the us political establishment and media depending on who is responsible for carrying them out. the authors apply this analytical framework in their current work by subsuming more recent bloodbaths under the four categories, which they argue are “eerily applicable to the present”, and “apply now with the same political bias and rigor” (17-19). using empirical measures such as the coverage of key events in the media, what the authors offer the 302 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times reader is more or less a classificatory schema or conceptual model for understanding bloodbaths rather than a specific interjection into theoretical debates surrounding critical accounts of genocide, imperialism and international law. today’s leading ‘experts’ on genocide and mass atrocities, including many journalists, academics, legal scholars and policymakers, are often careful to exclude from consideration the vietnam war, the 1965-1966 indonesian massacres, and the invasion and occupation of east timor by indonesia in 1975, the latter of which resulted in the deaths of somewhere between 100,000 and 200,000 civilians (although this is a hugely debatable claim) (18). the vietnam war, and the massive “sanctions of mass destruction” directed at iraq during the 1990s, are examples of constructive atrocities, where the victims of war crimes are deemed unworthy of our attention. however, when the perpetrators of genocide are considered enemies of the west, the atrocities are nefarious and their victims are seen to be worthy of our focus and sympathy. examples of nefarious atrocities include: cambodia under the khmer rouge, iraq under saddam hussein, halabja, bosnia, rwanda, kosovo and darfur. when systematic violence is carried out by us clients—such as indonesia in east timor from 1975-1999, israel in the gaza strip and west bank from 1967 to the present, or rwanda and uganda in congo—they are viewed by the us political establishment as benign and not worthy of condemnation. the final category, mythical, results from the inflation of numbers or invention of incidents by the us government, media sources and ngos to implement pre-planned interventions such as sanctions, embargoes and the funding of various ‘color revolutions.’ the politics of genocide has done much to emphasize the biases and contradictions of us foreign policy, but it should be read in conjunction with other theoretical contributions to themes related to genocide, imperialism and international law. first, while herman and peterson recognize that the history of ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity demonstrates “the centrality of racism to the imperial project” (22), there is little discussion of why advanced capitalist powers and oppressed nations are, in the first place, not equal partners in shaping the world. due in part to their use of terms such as ‘elite’ and western ‘establishment’ rather than class, their analysis should be complimented by recent work that is more explicit in highlighting the centrality of racism to issues of class, capitalism and imperialism in the international system. while not directly touching on the topic of genocide, marxist theorists writing on current modes of imperialism such as leo panitch and book review: the politics of genocide | 303 sam gindin (global capitalism and american empire, 2004) and david harvey (the new imperialism, 2003) emphasize the extent to which current modes of imperialism continue to exacerbate racial as well as global class inequalities. identifying the class basis of the new imperialism would help identify some of the underlying reasons for why media coverage of genocides in the west is often silent with respect to crimes committed by the various client regimes of advanced capitalist states. second, herman and peterson are highly critical of the “selective investigation” and “selective impunity” of the international criminal court (icc) in prosecuting alleged perpetrators of genocide, especially, in the contemporary age of ‘responsibility to protect,’ the exclusion from its jurisdiction of the international crime of aggression, judged at nuremburg to be the “supreme international crime” (21). however, on this theme, the authors seem to imply that the responsibility to protect doctrine and the very notion of human rights are to be located outside of contemporary imperialism. in this sense, they are often ambiguous on whether they seek to defend a position of legal neutrality, holding out hope for the reformed international law and institutions, which marxist theorist of international law china miéville has recently argued in between equal rights (2006), are completely incapable of adequately resisting imperialism. not only does legal equality, in this sense, mask actually existing inequality, the appeal to international law tends to undermine the most effective avenue for advancing necessary political resistance against the new imperialism—building solidarity as widely as possible through social movements centered not only on antiracism, but also on class struggle. 304 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times symposium on braverman _ comments by john porter i cannot comment on michael burawoy's paper from the point of view of any of the current "problematiques" of contemporary marxism, since i am not schooled in them. what little i have read does not particularly help me in clarifying the kinds of problems that interest me. but when i first read braverman, i was very much impressed and after rereading large sections of the book for this particular task, i am still very much impressed and i do not make that judgement in terms of his contribution, whatever that may be, to marxian labour economics or marxian sociology. nor is it because what braverman has said is new. most of this compilation of materials studies of work, labour force statistics and other things we knew before. perhaps i was impressed because the book was an articulate reminder of facts we did know but were prepared to overlook, and i use "we" here in the sense of the whole gamut of followers of conventional social science, of the post-second-world war period. i think we were prepared to overlook this evidence because of our overconcern for economic growth as the raison-d'etre of industrialization, and the way we saw worker productivity linked to economic growth. as well we believed consumption to be one of the major goals of the industrialization process. so convinced were we of these objectives, both those in actual work situations and those studying them, that we overlooked much of the change that braverman analyses. certainly social scientists accepted growth and upgrading of the labour force as basic to modernism, and i think the best illustration of that is found in every intergenerational mobility matrix where one compares the marginals of fathers and sons, and takes the difference as representative of progress because overall 23 alternate routes the sons have done better than the fathers. the objective of the exercise in mobility analysis is to discover how respondents have exploited the opportunity provided by occupational upgrading. so we ask whether or not the class structure is permeable, and to what degree. again, the basic assumption underlying analyses of these father-son occupational data, on which i have been engaged myself, is that the overall effects of industrialization have been beneficial and progressive. social scientists, of course, bear this burden of oversight, or guilt depending on how severe one considers the offence to be. i can remember papers back in the fifties in which industrial sociology was being condemned as "cow" sociology, and in which industrial psychology was referred to as deep therapy on the assembly line, so that the picture is not totally one of the social sciences going to work for capitalist enterprise, although i would not deny for a moment that that has been their major thrust. there have always been critics of this direction, however. many of the things said about the degradation of work, or the character of work, have been criticized through various art forms, if not sociology, and certainly taylorism has been subject to ridicule for a very long time. so i would see braverman's contribution as a massive critique of what work has become, whether or not he made any contribution to theory. i think the critique is particularly strong not only because of his analysis of work in the factory, but also because of the extent to which automation and new forms of technology have affected the tertiary sector, as well as the application of science and technology to the work process and the effects they have brought about. also, his observations (he is eclectic here) on the role of education and how it has helped to create the illusion of upgrading 24 symposium on braverman of the contemporary labour force is consistent with other current criticisms of credential ism. his appendix on occupational classifications is fascinating for anybody who has attempted to develop occupational classifications, but more importantly his analysis of the methodology of the prevailing official ones, more than any other part of the book calls into question the notion of an upgraded labour force. all of these things add up to a tremendously powerful critique of how we have looked at work. 25 book review: missing women, missing news | 291 book review missing women, missing news: covering crisis in vancouver’s downtown eastside, by david hugill. black point, ns: fernwood publishing, 2010. $17.95 cad., paper. isbn: 9781552663776. pages: 1-111. reviewed by ryan boyd1 in missing women, missing news, david hugill offers an insightful and critical study of the national newspaper coverage of the crisis of missing women in vancouver’s downtown eastside that followed through the proceedings against robert pickton, a critique of police responses to the crisis, and an analysis of the roles of the federal, provincial, and municipal governments in creating the socioeconomic conditions of the downtown eastside. hugill charges journalists and police as missing in action after sixty women, most of them sex workers, from this neighbourhood were murdered between 1978 and 2002. on the one hand, he criticizes journalists because mainstream news coverage of the crisis did not appear until 1998. on the other hand, he criticizes police for their contempt and negligence: “at best, they failed to notice. at worst, they failed to care” (p. 10). hugill argues that the narrative combining down on their luck women, a psychotic serial killer, and bad policing cannot satisfactorily explain why this crisis was ignored for so long. this prudent and topical study reveals the complexity of what was presented as a simple narrative and reassigns the culpability of the crisis to the state. the crux of hugill’s argument is that news coverage generally offered uncomplicated reasons why these women were neglected and victimized. media reasoning positioned the local vancouver police as the negligent party and the women as victims of pickton alone. hugill’s focus is to reconsider these partial yet dominant explanations by examining additional layers of complexity (p. 22). hugill explores the historically, politically and culturally pervasive reasons why this crisis was ignored for so long. the state should be implicated as structuring and perpetuating the vulnerability of these women through the lingering impact of 1  ryan boyd is a master’s candidate at the department of sociology and anthropology, carleton university (ottawa, canada). 292 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times colonialism, prostitution laws and policing patterns, the lack of a federal housing plan, and continued funding cutbacks for social programs directly impacting vancouver’s downtown eastside. his consideration of ideology as the primary force of shaping the logic of these narratives is his contribution to several studies already covering the mishandling of the crisis. chapter 1 examines the initial limitations of the media coverage and explanations for the crisis, as well as their lasting effects. hugill’s research reveals that newspapers reported that the crisis was largely neglected for two decades because of the negligence of the local vancouver police department (p. 24). this emerged as the central theme for explaining the crisis in the media. drawing from stuart hall, hugill suggests that local police negligence became the “primary interpretation” of the crisis, thereby limiting the physical space and parties responsible for the crisis at the local level. this is problematic for hugill as this interpretation defines both the sources and solutions at the local level, meaning “the narratives of newspapers mask the larger contradictions about the universality of state protection” (p. 24). this primary interpretation sets an ideological limit for the other narratives that would follow. while hugill commends journalists for implicating local authorities and their role in perpetuating the crisis, he argues that ultimately these groups were the only ones held accountable and that the structural conditions set by the state were neglected. chapter 2 is devoted to the role of the state in fostering the conditions that both produced and imperiled marginalized women in british columbia. hugill writes that the state is responsible for producing the structural conditions that put these women in danger in three central ways: (1) sweeping retrenchments of state systems of social solidarity beginning in 1983; (2) amendments to the criminal code targeted at curbing street prostitution; and (3) the persistent effects of state colonial policy (p. 32). the retrenchment of the state occurred in three distinct periods, beginning in 1983 with provincial budget cuts that “hollowed out social services” (p. 35). the liberal federal government attacked social services again during the 1990s. hugill argues that declining federal support both forced and inspired provincial liberals to further reduce spending beginning in 2001, resulting in the “single deepest cuts to social spending in canadian history” (p. 37). with this information in hand, hugill engages with his media analysis and discovers that newspapers report overwhelmingly that women engage in prostitution to support their drug addictions. despite the reality that many women book review: missing women, missing news | 293 engage in sex work as a way to supplement reduced or precarious incomes, this reporting has helped produce an ideological conflation with “drug addict” and “prostitute” (p. 39). changes to the canadian criminal code under brian mulroney in 1985 resulted in pushing already vulnerable women into the unseen margins of the downtown eastside and forcing them to work in relative isolation from one another. these changes impeded sex workers from forming cohesive community that could share information about bad dates and pressured them into making quicker, less-informed decisions about their clients. yet, only six out of 157 articles studied covering the crisis were critical of these sanctions.2 hugill’s layered work has the potential to inform current debates in prostitution laws, in which the federal government and provincial government of ontario are appealing an ontario superior court ruling that dismissed laws against keeping a common bawdy house, communicating for the purposes of prostitution and living on the avails of the trade (jones 2011). in a critical analysis of the racial component of the state’s culpability of endangering sex workers, hugill’s study finds that only thirteen of 157 newspaper articles acknowledged that a significant proportion of missing women were aboriginal (p. 47). despite coverage that goes beyond just-the-facts reporting, trying to invoke some deeper meaning to the crisis, journalists overlooked an abundance of research and statistics from well-established authorities that “clearly demonstrates the disproportionate burden of social suffering carried by aboriginal people in this neighbourhood” (p. 47). hugill questions why this central factor was neglected despite a number of credible sources for answers. his answer is in canadian commonsense ideology. our image of canada as a fair, democratic, and tolerant society creates “race blindness” as a by-product of commonsense. this commonsense reasoning posits that racism cannot possibly exist in this type of society, so it is ignored almost outright. with this layer being ignored, newspaper coverage focused mainly on the exotic nature of violence and drugs, the self-imposed risky lifestyle in society’s seedy underbelly, and the presence of a serial killer to add to the well-established coverage of police negligence. chapter 3 focuses on reported images of the missing women and sex workers from the downtown eastside. hugill pays special attention to who is speaking on behalf of missing women and prostitutes and their perceived credibility. hugill suggests that credibility is based on per2  while this is mainly a qualitative study, hugill uses several numerical representations as another way to illustrate the themes in newspaper coverage. 294 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times sonal relationships to victims rather than an understanding of the systemic issues facing the downtown eastside. his study finds that family and friends of missing women were quoted 109 times, advocates and allies of street women were quoted 25 times, and sex workers themselves were quoted 10 times (p. 62). this is indicative of vastly differentiated access to discourse and shows that sex workers were not in the position to describe themselves, but were rather described by others. one critique is that while it is implied, access to discourse is not something that hugill writes about in detail. a second critique is that this analysis also would have been more nuanced if details of quotes from police officers and their role in describing the women and the crisis had been included. when prostitutes were allowed to define themselves it was only to describe their one-dimensional drive for narcotics. hugill notes that each paper reminds its readers that these murdered women were “real people,” but describes them more like caricatures. conflating prostitution with crime makes it appear self-inflicted or self-selected—especially with drug addiction. drawing on hall, hugill suggests that through conflation with drug use, prostitution is criminalized and therefore depoliticized (p. 75). chapter 4 is where hugill’s work in human geography shines through. the aim of this chapter is to detail the ways in which coverage mapped the downtown eastside, using a multitude of images on streetlevel chaos that set the neighbourhood as symbolically distinct and disconnected from the rest of the city. hugill writes, “[t]hough seemingly disconnected, patterns of divestment in the dtes and patterns of geographically specific tolerance of illicit activity offer potent ways to interrogate the hollowness of the claim that vancouver’s inner city has been “taken over” by a degenerate population” (p. 83). here hugill is pointing to the ways in which capital and state interest had slowly disappeared from the area. furthermore, differentiated police presence and enforcement created a zone of tolerance that ultimately neglected missing women, suggesting that their disappearances were part of the transient nature of the job. the coverage of the downtown eastside is described through text and photographs as if it were ground zero of a zombie apocalypse, where the undead exchange sex for drugs with human beings instead of simply eating them. the neighbourhood is framed as “a horrifying hobbesian enclosure where the war of all against all is waged with unyielding fury” (p. 92). no one can be trusted and political intervention is seen as futile. however, hugill’s conclusion suggests that all is not lost. the book review: missing women, missing news | 295 downtown eastside has shown a great deal of leadership, bottom-up resistance, ground-level support, and ingenuity in a number of groundbreaking programs, such as insite, canada’s first safe-injection venue (p. 98). he suggests that sex workers must make changes even if they are not officially sanctioned by the state, such as collective work environments, networks that share bad-date lists, or sex worker unions. they must also push for a venue for safer sex work. these suggestions have partially come to fruition in the aforementioned ontario superior court case ruling, which has seen current and former sex workers advocate for safer conditions. work like missing women, missing news questions commonsense ideology and urges critical thinking. while hugill focuses on vancouver’s downtown eastside, his work is relevant in current debates surrounding prostitution laws, spatial identities of other urban areas with concentrated poverty3, and the residual effects of colonialism in an aboriginal population. the aboriginal population faces structural issues such as systemic poverty, high rates of incarceration, mental health concerns, and loss of culture, among many others, because of canada’s racist history. this history cannot be ignored because of the contemporary commonsense of tolerance. in the case of vastly disparate birthrates, without developing strategies that problematize and work to resolve the negative impacts of colonialism, institutionally and culturally disenfranchised aboriginal communities will continue to grow in a culture of contempt and indifference. references: aboriginal peoples in canada in 2006: inuit, métis and first nations, 2006 census (2008). ottawa: ministry of industry statistics canada. jones, a. (2011, may 4). “sex-trade workers say ottawa trivializing their serious claims in appeal”. maclean’s .ca. retrieved may 18, 2011 from www.macleans.ca/article.jsp?content=n6755746. walks, r. and l. bourne. (2006). “ghettos in canada’s cities? racial segregation, ethnic enclaves and poverty concentration in canadian urban areas”. canadian geographer, 50(3), 273-297 . 3  walks and bourne (2006) report a growing trend of racialized concentrated poverty that suggests a ‘ghettoization’ in major canadian cities, such toronto, saskatoon, and winnipeg. book review: revolutionary doctors | 267 book review revolutionary doctors: how venezuela and cuba are changing the world’s conception of health care by steve brouwer. new york: new york: monthly review press, 2011. $18.95 u.s., paper. isbn: 978-1-58367-239-6. pages: 1-256. reviewed by rebekah wetmore1 revolutionary doctors explores the human needs based health care model developed in cuba and how those involved are becoming protagonists of social change. beginning with cuba’s original revolutionary doctor – che guevara – readers are guided through the origins of cuban health care, how it spread to venezuela and beyond, and the counterrevolutionary response. che guevara’s vision of “combining the humanitarian mission of medicine with the creation of a just society” (p.11) is being implemented in cuba and venezuela. soon after the triumph of the cuban revolution, thousands of doctors and over a hundred medical professors left the country further weakening their inadequate medical system. the new cuban government insisted on developing universal health care through adopting a preventative based system, opening a second medical school and creating positions for recent graduates of the university of havana medical school in rural areas. health care continued to improve including through the creation of basic health teams and brigadistas sanitarias or health brigades in the end of the 1980’s. every small neighborhood has a basic health team, which includes one doctor and one nurse who live in the community. not only did this increase community coverage to 99% by 2004 but it also gave residents more of an active role in their health care. health brigades, made up of residents, assist doctors in prevention programs and public health campaigns. while cuba created universal health care domestically, they continued their commitment to internationalism. from algeria to angola and more recently haiti, cuba has sent health professionals on humanitarian missions for over five decades in response to emergencies and “long-term collaboration in developing 1 rebekah wetmore is an independent researcher and community organizer. she has an ma in sociology from acadia university in wolfville, nova scotia. 268 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism another nation’s system of primary health care” or the comprehensive health plan (p.45). along with humanitarian missions, the latin american school of medicine (elam) was founded in 1998 for students from around the world to study medicine for free. in return, students promise to serve the poor of their country through preventative community health care. venezuela’s health care was in desperate need of an overhaul as “prior to 2003, there were just 1,500 doctors employed by the venezuelan government to provide primary care in a public system that had 4,400 offices called ambulatorios” (p.85). as a means to improve health care the cuba-venezuela comprehensive cooperation agreement, a precursor to the bolivarian alliance of the peoples of our americas (alba), was signed on october 30, 2000. this agreement allowed for the exchange of goods, services and experts between the two countries with oil as the largest export from venezuela and cuba offering human capital through “thousands of teachers, agronomists, technicians and other experts” (p.81). after the failed economic coup in 2002, the government consolidated control of pdvsa, the state oil company, and its revenue, which was used to increase funding for social programs such as barrio adentro to address the inadequate public health system. barrio adentro has been expanded to include four different levels from preventative primary care, diagnostic centers, updating and modernizing the public health care system through increased community involvement, improved medical technology and the construction of new hospitals, and building new specialized research hospitals for specific areas like oncology, cardiology and nephrology. similar to the cuban model, these missions mobilize community members to be active participants in their health care. if a community wants a cuban doctor they are “expected to organize a committee of ten to twenty volunteers from the community who would commit themselves to finding office spaces, providing sleep quarters, collecting furniture and simple fixtures, and feeding the medical providers” (p.84). though brouwer singles out health professionals as protagonists of social change, community members who support the health programs are also shaping the socialist project. integrating community members into the system empowers residents while giving them a direct role in shaping their health care and negating top down approaches. in terms of gender, women are becoming empowered through their involvement in health committees to increase their involvement in their communities. a main argument of revolutionary doctors – that those involved in health book review: revolutionary doctors | 269 care are becoming protagonists for socialist change can be extended to include all participants of missions or social programs in venezuela. not only are venezuelans taking an active role in their health care but also other missions including education (ribas, robinson and sucre) and local government through communal councils. both countries have made huge gains in traditional measures of health care and the social determinants of health but there are still problems internally and abroad. the united states attempts to undermine the new conception of health care through media, laws and aid to destabilizing groups. domestically, problems include inconsistent coverage in the most disadvantaged communities and the inherited inefficient bureaucracy. critics argue that cuba’s health care has suffered from a decrease in doctors as large numbers continue to go on humanitarian missions, which pays considerably more than practicing in cuba. as is set out in the agreement between cuba and venezuela and all countries with humanitarian missions, cuban doctors will leave and host countries must develop self-sufficient health care systems. a common critique is that an insufficient number of new doctors are trained and thus host countries continue to be dependent on cuban doctors. as a response to potential dependency, mission sucre, the program for free university level education, in conjunction with barrio adentro, medicinia integral communitaria, “university without walls” (p.15), and elam train new medical doctors. in the end, brouwer provides a compelling case for the needs based conception of health care, which has improved the lives of the poor around the world. his arguments are supported with the fascinating personal stories that are weaved throughout the book. from medical students studying in medicinia integral comunitaria in the small village of monte carmelo to cuban doctors’ experiences in post-earthquake haiti, there are numerous examples of seemingly ordinary people working to create a better health care system and society. these stories provide hope that there is an alternative to the profit-driven capitalist model of health care and capitalism in general. book review: rosa luxemburg: ideas in action | 261 book review rosa luxemburg: ideas in action by paul frölich, translated by johanna hoornweg. chicago, illinois: haymarket books, 2010. $18 u.s., paper. isbn 97-1-60846-074-8. pages: 1-311. reviewed by tiffany hall1 rosa luxemburg: ideas in action is the intellectual biography of rosa luxemburg and her role in socialist party movements in poland, russia, and germany at the turn of the 20th century. author paul frolich sketches a portrait of a woman who greatly shaped the composition and direction of socialist ideology. the author was himself once a member of the german socialist democratic party and, like luxemburg, was a founding member of the german communist party. these positions allowed for an intimate relationship with luxemburg, giving him access to her incredible character before she died. frölich combines what few writings of luxemburg still exist with other personal and political writings from other party members during that time. by doing so, he constructs a vivid account of luxemburg’s progression through the socialist party system up until her murder in january of 1919. while reading frölich’s book it becomes questionable whether he should have created two separate pieces instead of one: only chapters one and ten speak specifically to luxemburg’s personality and life in a biographical manner. the other chapters, which make up a substantial part of the book, alternatively may have been presented as a history of the socialist party. several chapters are more focused on the relationships between luxemburg, kautsky, mehring, and liebknecth, party members and writers who worked closely with luxemburg and held key positions in the party, and many chapters describe the intricate details large events, such as the russian revolution and the first world war. yet there are few mentions of clara zetkin, who was known to be luxemburg’s most intimate friend. frölich’s decision to create the book as it appears is a testament to the dedication of luxemburg to the socialist cause; separating the two would be disingenuous. thus, those looking specifically for information on luxemburg the individual may be slightly disappointed; her life was too much a part of politics to ignore 1 tiffany hall is an ma candidate in sociology and anthropology at carleton university, ottawa. 262 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism any of her political endeavors in attempting to understand the person she was. for this reason, the book is a much more substantial contribution to understanding the creation and progression of the socialist party. due to her role in the changing nature of the party, luxemburg could not help but have a heavy presence in the discussion of party politics. frölich’s strongest aspect is his detailing of the progression of socialist ideas and movement during the most intense times. for instance, the chapter on the outbreak of the first world war is a substantial contribution to the understanding of the socialist position in germany and prussia at the time. frölich integrates aspects from luxemburg’s writing for pamphlets and articles to highlight the parallels and progression of her ideology. his discussion of her piece the accumulation of capital reveals luxemburg’s process in her own understanding of marxism. he describes the effect it had on understanding imperialism and capitalism and how it changed the approach of the party toward policies for the working class. although the entirety of the book is informative and succinct, the real beauty of frölich’s writing as an author comes to fruition during the last two chapters of the book; the final two months of the german revolution leading up to luxemburg’s murder. frölich describes the creation of the “spartakusbund” and provides many excerpts from the rote fahne, the journal in which luxemburg would write for the final time. frölich points to this time period as the clearest indication of a direct extension of karl marx’s ideas, particularly the communist manifesto. this adds greater emphasis on the importance of luxemburg and her socialist advocacy within historical marxism. in final chapter, frölich reveals the little known facts about luxemburg’s life and character, as well as provides his own opinion on the events leading to her death. the strength of the counter-revolution is seen by frölich as a ‘diabolical plan’ in which luxemburg and her spartans were deliberately dismantled through political guises. frölich’s witness of the decline in mental health following her weakening physical state provides enough speculation for him to ask whether luxemburg was the great leader they believed her to be: “…did her physical strength simply not suffice for the necessary tasks, or did this great leader, who as a theoretician and as a strategist of class struggle moved ahead with such unshakeable inner strength and tenacity, lack that crowning touch of the party leader who can make realistically sound judgments at critical moments irrespective of his mood book review: rosa luxemburg: ideas in action | 263 and who knows how to see to it that his decisions are carried out that crowning touch which became lenin’s second nature. this question, of course, can never be answered” (p.293). frölich’s question is somewhat sorrowful, as he acknowledges that the events led to the rise of the counter-revolution, and to the eventual rise to power of hitler in 1933. overall, frölich’s piece allows for an extensive yet clear description of the creation of the socialist party in prussia, russia, and germany at the turn of the 20th century. this newly translated edition provides greater detail of luxemburg’s life as well as excerpts from her most influential writings, particularly those that had great impact on the socialist party. frölich’s book provides a significant contribution to understanding the progression of the socialist party and, more importantly, to understanding the role luxemburg had in advocating for socialism and the power of the working class. frölich’s book is an important historical contribution to marxist literature and an important tool for understanding past socialist ideologies and the current political landscape. austerity is bad for our health | 199 austerity is bad for our health: gender and distributional impacts of ontario’s 2012 budget — sheila block1 there are many questions to be asked and answered about the shifts in fiscal policy stance and discourse from the start of the 2008 financial crisis to the present. the policy consensus on the need for concerted international government intervention and the need for constraints and regulation of markets has vanished from the mainstream policy discussion. it has been replaced by an austerity agenda that suffers from short-term amnesia about the causes of government deficits and debt, and is focused instead on a further reduction in the role of the state. this paper will, however, limit itself to an analysis of the 2012 ontario budget, and its gender and distributional impacts. the agreement reached between the ndp and the liberal government resulted in the first progressive change in canadian income tax rates in more than a decade (benzie & ferguson, 2012). the agreement included a temporary increase in taxes for ontarians earning more than $500,000 per year and a 1 percent increase in rates for people who are surviving on social assistance. these were small, but important, first steps in addressing the record levels of income inequality in ontario. these adjustments around the edges, however, will not change the fundamental impact of this budget. the budget document boasted that for every dollar in new revenues, there were four dollars of savings and cost containment measures. even after the agreement with the ndp, average annual growth in program spending will be held to 1.0 percent between 2011–12 and 2014–15 (ontario ministry of finance, 2012). this means that there will be real, per capita decreases in government spending in ontario. a program of reductions in government services to this size and scale will increase inequality. research by mackenzie and 1 sheila block is the director of economic analysis at the wellesley institute, an independent research and policy institute focused on advancing population health. 200 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism shillington (2009) shows the progressivity of government expenditures. these reductions will have the most detrimental impact on low-income ontarians, but will also reach far beyond them. some ontarians will have to do without the public services they have relied on because they will not be able to afford to purchase them privately. for others, life will become far more expensive when they have to start paying privately for services their tax dollars used to pay for. only those whose resources are so large that they rarely need to rely on public services will be unaffected by the impact of such a shift in the landscape of ontario public services. given their higher incidence of low income, racialized and immigrant communities will be disproportionately affected by these cutbacks. an example of the distributional impact of cutbacks in services is the changes to education funding (people for education, 2012). these changes will include cuts to programs that support math acquisition in schools. some children, who need this assistance, will go without it because their families will not be able to afford to purchase these services privately. for other families, life will become more expensive when they have to privately purchase this help for their children, previously paid for by their tax dollars. only those parents who were already privately purchasing these services for their children will be unaffected. the impact of the loss of public services will be compounded for the thousands of families who have members with public sector jobs. many of these families will face unemployment, reduced access to public services, reduced family incomes, and increased economic uncertainty. again, the impact of these changes will be felt more acutely by lower-income ontarians. workers in lower-paid occupations — such as cleaning, food preparation, and clerks — are generally better paid in the public sector than in the private sector. a cook working in the public sector was paid an average of $26,216 a year in 2006, which is 24 percent more than the $21,089 average received by private sector cooks. on the other hand, higher-paid occupations — such as managers, lawyers and accountants — tend to be paid considerably less in the public sector than in the private sector. for example, engineering managers in the public sector were paid an average of $93,514 in 2006, which is 27 percent below the average of $128,886 in the private sector (sanger, 2011). as a result, higher-income public sector workers who lose their jobs have better prospects in the private sector than lower-income workers who lose theirs. these cutbacks in services and loss of public sector jobs will come at a time when income inequality in canada is at levels that have not been seen since the 1920s (yalnizyan, 2010). austerity is bad for our health | 201 health impacts of austerity the government’s austerity agenda poses substantial risks to the health and well-being of ontarians. a recent report from statistics canada provides a stark example of the impact of income and income inequality on health. the difference in life expect ancy at age 25 between the highest and lowest income groups was 7.1 years for men and 4.9 years for women (tjepkema & wilkins, 2011). while these differences are striking, an equally important finding is that life expectancy increases with each and every step in the income scale. this research found that the gaps are even greater in health-related quality of life, where once again, there was an improvement in health at every step up the income scale. as this research shows, the health impacts of government actions that improve social conditions are not limited to low-income individuals and families. this is supported by international research that shows that inequality has an impact on our health and well-being (wilkinson & pickett, 2009). in more equal countries, people are healthier, live longer, and commit fewer crimes. these relationships hold among all income groups. even for the highest income segment of the population, people are safer, healthier and live longer when they live in a more equal society. there are many ways that austerity programs have an impact on health. the link between unemployment and ill-health has been clearly established. research on the aggregate level has shown that high levels of unemployment in society and in neighbourhoods are correlated with poor health and increased mortality (block, 2010). a recent imf report, based on international evidence, shows that austerity programs increase unemployment and long-term unemployment in particular (ball, leigh, & loungani, 2011). the report also shows that the burden of austerity is disproportionately borne by wage earners rather than those who rely on profits or rents for their incomes. increased unemployment, lower job quality, decreased levels of/access to social benefits, and reduced access to services that support social inclusion will all have a negative impact on ontarians’ health. and these impacts will fall disproportionately on ontarians from marginalized communities – particularly those who are low-income, racialized, and new immigrants. gender impacts of austerity the burden of reductions in public services, loss of public sector employment, and privatization of public sector employment falls more heavily on women than on men. the slowdown in spending proposed in the budget cannot be accomplished without reduced employment in the 202 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism public sector, and a shift of employment within the public sector from better paid unionized jobs with pensions and benefits to more precarious work. these changes will have a differential impact by gender. women comprise just over 60 percent of ontario public sector employees, and about 47 percent of private sector employees (statistics canada, n.d.). the impact of layoffs will be compounded by the differences in wages for women in the public and private sectors. on average, women employed in public sector jobs are paid 4.5 percent more than women in comparable occupations in the private sector: $45,821 compared to $43,841. women who are laid off from the public sector will likely have difficulty finding employment with similar remuneration, men in the public sector are paid an average of 5.3 percent less: $57,318 compared to $60,531 (sanger, 2011). as a result, a decrease in public sector employment will tend to widen the gap between men and women’s wages. the impact on women’s remuneration is not limited only to job losses. shifts in the method of public service delivery will also have a disproportionate impact. private delivery of services and a shift to community–based health care delivery will move women to more precarious employment situations, where they are less likely to be unionized and typically have lower compensation. caregiving makes up a substantial portion of public services. when these services are reduced, the responsibility falls on disproportionately on women to pick up the slack. for example, 21 percent of women in ontario provide unpaid caregiving to seniors as compared to 16 percent of men. women also provided more hours of caregiving, with 9 percent spending more than 5 hours a week as compared to 5.7 percent of men (statistics canada, 2008). the loss of public services will increase unpaid work for women while reducing their remuneration and opportunities for paid work. reducing women’s employment and wages has an impact on their families and their communities. the table below shows the increasing importance of women’s contributions to family incomes. the increase in the share of families where women contribute more than 50 percent of income has been sharpest in areas of the province that have been particularly hard hit by the downturn in manufacturing. these families and areas will be particularly disadvantaged by this year’s budget. austerity is bad for our health | 203 sh ar e of t ot al n um be r of f am il ie s w it h th e w if e co nt ri bu ti ng o ve r 50 % t o hu sb an dw if e em pl oy m en t in co m e 20 00 20 01 20 02 20 03 20 04 20 05 20 06 20 07 20 08 20 09 to ro nt o 27 .7 % 28 .2 % 28 .7 % 29 .2 % 29 .5 % 29 .7 % 30 .1 % 30 .5 % 31 .2 % 32 .8 % lo nd on 26 .2 % 26 .3 % 26 .8 % 27 .2 % 27 .4 % 27 .8 % 28 .0 % 28 .8 % 30 .0 % 32 .4 % w in ds or 20 .4 % 21 .5 % 22 .5 % 22 .7 % 23 .7 % 24 .2 % 25 .2 % 26 .5 % 27 .9 % 31 .6 % ha m ilt on 22 .8 % 23 .7 % 24 .4 % 24 .7 % 25 .1 % 25 .9 % 26 .7 % 27 .5 % 28 .3 % 30 .4 % on ta rio 25 .8 % 26 .1 % 26 .8 % 27 .3 % 27 .7 % 28 .0 % 28 .5 % 29 .0 % 29 .7 % 31 .6 % so ur ce : s ta tis tic s c an ad a. ta bl e 1 11 -0 02 1 f am ily ch ar ac te ris tic s, hu sb an dw ife fa m ili es , b y w ife ’s co nt rib ut io n to h us ba nd -w ife em pl oy m en t i nc om e, an nu al (n um be r u nl es s o th er w ise n ot ed ) 204 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism conclusion the changes to the 2012 ontario budget that resulted from the agreement between the liberal government and the ndp were a welcome departure from the austerity agenda. they increased the progressivity of the tax system, and mitigated the erosion of purchasing power of inadequate social assistance rates. however, the overall impact of this budget is to increase inequality in ontario. by relying much more heavily on cutback on expenditures than increasing tax revenues, it will have a disproportionate impact on lower income ontarians. because of the role of public sector employment in women’s working lives; it will also erode gender equity in the province. increased inequality, unemployment, and low income resulting from this budget will have negative health impacts for ontarians. references ball, l. leigh, d. and loungani, p. (2011). painful medicine: the international monetary fund finance and development, 48(3), 20-24. www.imf.org/ external/pubs/ft/fandd/2011/09/pdf/ball.pdf benzie, r. and ferguson, r. (2012, april 23). ontario budget: mcguinty agrees to horvath’s tax the rich scheme toronto star. http://www. thestar.com/news/canada/politics/article/1166296—ontario-budget mcguintyandhorwath-in-last-ditch-talks-to-prevent-election block, s. (2010). work and health: exploring the impact of employment on health disparities. the wellesley institute. http://www.wellesleyinstitute. com/publication/our-working lives-affect-our-health/ mackenzie, h., & shillington, r. (2009). canada’s quiet bargain the benefits of public spending canadian centre for policy alternatives. http://www.policyalternatives.ca/ sites/default/files/uploads/publications/national_office_pubs/2009/ benefits_from_public_spending.pdf ontario ministry of finance. (2012). balancing the budget. toronto: queen’s printer. http://www.fin.gov.on.ca/en/budget/ontariobudgets/2012/bk3.html people for education. (2012). education funding cuts in 2012 budget. http:// www.peopleforeducation.ca/pfe-news/ontario-budget-includes-cutsto-education-funding/ sanger, t. (2011). battle of the wages: who gets paid more, public or private sector workers? ottawa: canadian union of public employees. statistics canada. (n.d.).table 282 0012 labour force survey estimates (lfs), employment by class of worker, north american industry classification system (naics) and sex, annually (persons). austerity is bad for our health | 205 cansim (database). last updated january 4, 2012. http://www5.statcan. gc.ca/cansim/pick-choisir?lang=eng&p2=33&id=2820012 statistics canada. (2008). 2006 census. unpaid work, age groups and sex for the population 15 years and over of canada, provinces, territories, census divisions and census subdivisions. catalogue number 97-559xcb2006015.last updated july 4, 2011. http://goo.gl/hokxy statistics canada. (n.d.). table 111-0021 family characteristics, husbandwife families, by wife’s contribution to husband-wife employment income, annual (number). cansim (database). last updated june 26, 2012. http://www5.statcan.gc.ca/cansim/pickchoisir?lang=eng&p2=3 3&id=1110021 tjepkema, m. & wilkins, r. (2011). remaining life expectancy at age 25 and probability of survival to age 75, by socio-economic status and aboriginal ancestry. statistics canada health reports. 22(4), 2-7. http:// www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/82-003-x/2011004/article/11560-eng.pdf wilkinson, r. & pickett, k. (2009). the spirit level: why more equal societies always do better. london: allen lane. yalnizyan, a. (2010). the rise of canada’s richest 1%. canadian centre for policy alternatives. http://www.policyalternatives.ca/sites/default/files/ uploads/publications/national%20office/20 10/12/richest%201%20 percent.pdf 978-1-926958-01-9 163 book review cops, crime and capitalism: the law and order agenda in canada by todd gordon. halifax: fernwood publishing, 2006. $21.95 can, paper. isbn 1-55266-185-7. pages 1-171. reviewer: gulden ozcan1 debates around the notions of security, police, the state and the dissent have accelerated in the aftermath of the g8/20 summit in toronto. on the face of these debates, revisiting one of the ambitious contributions to the critical literature on police in canada is important. todd gordon’s cops, crime and capitalism: the law and order agenda in canada provides two primary insights that can be utilized in current discussions. first, gordon situates his analysis of the broader police project in the context of massive restructuring of social relations after each crisis of capitalism. thus, the increasing adoption of the ‘law-and-order policies’ by the canadian state since the 1990s is depicted in relation to the neoliberal restructuring of social relations after the downfall of keynesian policies. second, gordon’s focus on racialised and gendered aspects of policing in canada opens up the possibility for new approaches to locate this long-delayed discussion at the very centre of the materialist analysis of state power, capital and labour relations. gordon, by conducting a careful empirical study of legal regulations, demonstrates how police practices have served the systematic subordination of racialised and gendered populations in canada. the theoretical stance gordon employs in the book is informed by open marxism and the concepts developed by mark neocleous, one of the leading figures in critical police/security studies. the open marxism approach provides him with theoretical tools in defining the state as the political form of the class antagonism between labour and capital. even though the organization of social relations are 1 gulden ozcan is a phd student in the department of sociology & anthropology at carleton university. she can be reached at gozcan@connect.carleton.ca cops, crime and capitalism: the law and order agenda in canada 164 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research operated by the state and its apparatuses, gordon argues these operations originate from the struggles between labour and capital. gordon draws on neocleous’s historical analysis of the broader police project in relation to the rise of capitalism as well as his conceptualizations of the “political administration” and the “fabrication of social order”. paralleling neocleous, gordon defines policing as a form of “political administration” that has historically played an important role in the “fabrication of social order” (pp. 38-50). i shall also acknowledge a third theoretical stance gordon uses, that is, his critical attitude towards “marxist-oriented functionalism” and foucauldian “panoptical theories”. although he mentions the former very briefly only in the introduction, he spends a great deal of the first chapter on the latter. it is, therefore, important to mention gordon’s critique of what he calls “panoptical theories”, i.e., theories that take “governing at a distance” approach as their starting point. gordon pinpoints a “gap between the reality of contemporary policing and its portrayal” in this literature (p. 7). he identifies three main assumptions of panoptic theories: (1) policing is done electronically at-a-distance; (2) electronic policing is exercised equally on everybody regardless of class, race and gender differences; (3) electronic policing reinforces the emergence of more local and autonomous forms of policing (pp. 7-8). gordon’s position toward these assumptions unfolds in the question of “at a distance or in your face?” (p. 13). he basically argues that the new tactics of policing does not change the historical objective of police forces, i.e., targeting working-class, racialised and gendered populations through ever-ascending centralized and intense state power (pp. 8-27). drawing attention to the problematic aspects of panoptic theories strengthens gordon’s approach to police as a state-centred strategy. although his criticisms of the panoptical and at-a-distance approaches are persuasive, his equation of foucault with foucauldians is not. it is obvious that foucault’s work has generated a basis for both panoptical theories and governing at a distance approach. however, some aspects of these approaches contradict foucault’s own writings. gordon does not distinguish foucault from the foucauldians and thus presents a reductionist attitude towards foucault’s contribution to the literature on police. his miscomprehension of foucault’s oeuvre results in a few literally wrong assumptions such as the naming of ‘at a distance approach’ after foucault—which was originally suggested by p. miller and n. rose in 19922—, the rejection of foucault’s meticulous attention to material social relations, the denial of foucault’s understanding of police as a state-centric initiative at its birth, and his attack of foucault’s notion of “docile bodies” on the basis of the absence of agency. nevertheless, this confusion neither 2 rose, n. and miller, p. 1992 “political power beyond the state: problematics of government”, british journal of sociology 43(2): 173-205. 165cops, crime and capitalism: the law and order agenda in canada diminishes the strong basis of the arguments in the book, nor contributes anything to it. following the theoretical debate in the second chapter, gordon draws on the history of police in the making of the capitalist social order from the nineteenth century onwards. gordon defines this historical role of police as such: police power has been mobilized [by the ruling classes] to criminalize a series of street-based activities that either provide people with an opportunity to survive outside market relations or serve as distractions from waged work. in the process, policing has worked to constitute a class of labourers dependent on the wage for subsistence and thereby a bourgeois order rooted in the authority of private property and the subordination of working people to the imperatives of capital accumulation (p. 50). in what follows, he compares and contrasts nineteenth-century police practices with more current police practices and thus illustrates the continuous dynamic that lies at the very raison d’etre of the police project, i.e., targeting labour power to build a more orderly, disciplined, regulated and supervised society in accord with the changing needs of capitalism. the third chapter provides a brief history of the neoliberal transition from keynesianism in advanced capitalist countries, with specific attention to canada. in order to respond to the growing structural imbalances in the economy, gordon explains that labour costs have been reduced significantly since the 1960s through increasing the number of non-standard, non-unionized, and unqualified types of labour as a state policy. this of course was not a pain-free process. although the initial attempt of consecutive governments was to have policies of “austerity by consent”, gordon argues this did not work due to the disruptive power of labour at the time. as a result, the coercive power of the state has been increased and lawand-order policies increasingly adopted (pp. 54-57). the fourth chapter portrays that new regulations introduced with the lawand-order policies that target not so much the poor, but the contemporary indigent that seek to live outside the labour market. in this sense, gordon examines the vagrancy act of 1869 and shows that following the economic crisis of the 1970s, vagrancy status did not come back to the criminal code; however, substitutes have taken their place in an attempt to serve the same objective. this is evidenced, for example, in provincial legislation and municipal by-laws such as the safe streets acts, panhandling by-laws, and the adoption of targeting and intelligence policing strategies (pp. 82-85). accompanying this new work ethic has been a re-regulation of social assistance programs. gordon reveals that people in need of social assistance 166 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research due to unemployment are encouraged to gain and/or improve their “transferable skills” (p. 105). these skills are defined as self-discipline, getting to work on time, meeting the expectations of the employer and being motivated to work. in the last chapter of the book gordon problematizes how policing as “an administrative feature of state power” takes on a certain position when it comes to immigrant communities (p. 128). unlike some marxist approaches to immigration, gordon does not limit his account to portraying immigrants only as a source of cheap foreign labour. although the initial emphasis is put on the role of immigrant labour in filling the worst jobs canada has to offer, gordon does not ignore other circumstances surrounding immigrants. he especially takes issue with the conditions of women and non-white immigrants. for instance, he demonstrates how the points system used in immigration applications neglects the unpaid domestic labour of women and makes them rely on their husband in the application process (p. 115). moreover, he establishes the link between the exploitative immigration policies of the federal government and the cheap labour requirements of capital by drawing attention to the non-immigrant employment authorization program (nieap), live-in caregiver program, as well as the government’s blindness to nonstatus immigrants’ participation in the labour process. gordon also speaks to the fact that the criminalization of certain drugs are strongly related to canada’s immigration policies. he claims, for example, that the prohibition of opium in 1908 was a direct response to chinese immigration. the ruling class was concerned that opium shows “signs of non-conformity with “canadian” order, and that this vice of bodily pleasure might infiltrate the ranks of the white working class” (p. 130). the same applies to the prohibition of cocaine in 1911, cannabis in 1923 and khat in 1997, however this time as a response to black, mexican and somalian immigrants, with the explicit aim being to produce public order on the streets (p. 135). all in all, gordon’s book provides a significant overview of policing in canada. it has much to contribute to the current debates on the role of police in the current reformation of the neoliberal order. although gordon’s approach to police as a state-centred strategy leaves some questions unanswered such as the ever-increasing numbers of private police, he provides an accessible account to remind us that policing is a strategy driven by a moral discourse on the importance of employment and self-discipline, rather than a strategy to fight crime. whole book pdf book review: the ecological rift: capitalism’s war on the earth | 285 book review the ecological rift: capitalism’s war on the earth, by john bellamy foster, brett clark, and richard york. new york: monthly review press, 2010. $17.95 u.s.; paper. isbn: 978-1-58367218-1. pages: 544. reviewed by: naomi alisa calnitsky1 in marx’s ecology: materialism and nature (2000), john bellamy foster offered a dynamic and in-depth interrogation of the ecological strands of karl marx’s thought, exploring a number of marx’s critiques of capitalist agriculture and linking his neglected ideas to the modern-day ecological movement. in ecology against capitalism (2002), foster problematized the relationship between contemporary american environmentalism and the needs and preferences of the labour movement, and offered critical insights into the environment’s relationship with the economic world, citing critical contemporary examples of the environmental costs associated with the capitalist industrial footprint. his innovative and up-to-date approach placed politicized ecological questions into direct focus, to ask, how might we incorporate the earth into the balance sheet? building upon past theoretical approaches and contributions, in the ecological rift: capitalism’s war on the earth (2010), foster, clark and york offer a radical and comprehensive critique of the planetary environmental crisis as exacerbated by industrial capitalism. situated within the subfield of environmental sociology, the authors posit arguments which depart from a distinctly marxist foundation. their central target is industrial capitalism and its derivative effects, namely, the unsustainable social habits of consumer forces associated with capitalist production, and the unprecedented levels of ecological destruction associated with accumulative capitalism. foster, clark and york highlight the alienating tendencies of capitalism, as well as the irreversible changes wrought upon our ecosystem and biosphere from capitalist activities. 1 naomi alisa calnitsky is a ph.d. candidate at the department of history, carleton university (ottawa, canada), with a focus on the history of mexican seasonal agricultural workers in western canada. 286 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times by re-inserting ecological thought into analyses of the human economy, this highly-needed and readable work comprised of scientific arguments and synthetic approaches underscores planetary assaults resulting from the human-industrial footprint and bemoans an apparent lack of concern within social science disciplines towards environmental questions at a time when the planet has approached a red alert status. situated within a critical anti-capitalist tradition, the authors point to an abandonment of a critique of capital in existing ecologically-minded social science approaches. they consider the question of “green capitalism,” or capitalism’s potential or ostensible ability to modernize and adapt along ecologically sustainable lines, in a critical light. additionally, they question the deceptive phenomenon of “corporate green-washing.” the work emphasizes accelerated transformations in the global environment, where ecosystem degradation and human-induced climate change is linked intimately to the expansion of industrial capitalism. the authors argue that the recovery of the environment may not be ameliorated solely through faith in capitalism’s ability to adapt or modernize according to green demands. while this remains a problematic viewpoint, given the fact of capitalism’s current position as the dominant economic system governing human economic interrelations across much of the globe, the marxist critique offered by the ecological rift nevertheless remains indispensable. one of the book’s central strengths is its questioning of the premise of unlimited economic growth from an ecologycentered perspective, in which capital is depicted as an “unstoppable” as well as “crushing” force upon nature. the ecological rift successfully bridges a diversity of academic fields including economics, ecology, and environmental/marxist sociology, taking its readership into the realm of a yet-to-be established field, that of political ecology. its authors highlight irreversible ecological transformations such as ocean warming and the degradation of coral reef systems, and place a good deal of emphasis upon scientific proofs for the existence of climate change. highlights of the work include one imaginative chapter entitled “capitalism in wonderland” which illustrates how environmental deterioration has stemmed from human mediations with the natural world and has been propelled by the demands of the capitalist marketplace. here, our capitalist wonderland is framed by foster, clark and york as a thoroughly artificial and alienating human landscape and construct. the ecological rift has global and international implications, and yet it would likely appeal only to an environmentalistinclined readership. the work requires attention from ecological and book review: the ecological rift: capitalism’s war on the earth | 287 economic schools alike, as its efforts to bridge fields represents a widening of boundaries in the name of ecological urgency. significantly, the authors engage with the concept of metabolic rift, defined loosely as the way in which the capitalist system has radically separated natural production from sites consumption, particularly at a global scale and across imperial divides. capitalism has radically separated humanity from nature, and through “metabolic rift analysis” the authors seek to comprehend environmental catastrophe in terms of the capitalist order of things. critically entertaining the question of capitalism’s ability to modernize and adapt according to the demands of sustainability, the ecological rift retains skepticism towards the destructive effects of individualist accumulation and prefers socialism as a route towards sustainability. critically, the work stresses the need for a renewed interrogation into the dynamic relationship between nature and capitalism. it is primarily concerned with an interrogation of capitalism as an anti-ecological force, yet remains wholly devoid of any analysis of capitalism’s relationship with gender, avoiding any discussion of capitalism’s continued place as maleoriented, rationalized economic regime which exploits and intersects with the natural world in profoundly powerful ways. still, the work offers a number of solutions deserving of consideration. offering a dialogue which incorporates the natural sciences with the social sciences, the ecological rift is profoundly multi-disciplinary and one of the strengths of the book is its sense of urgency. the authors claim that we are living in an age of unprecedented ecological destruction and only radical ecological approaches may offer sustainable pathways for environmental regeneration. the author’s discussion of “imperialism and ecological metabolism” probes the concept of imperialist extraction as it intersected with agricultural production and consumption in metropolitan england, exploring the nineteenth century peruvian guano trade to europe from a metabolic standpoint and citing the trade as an example of capitalist exploitation and structural dependency. marx’s humanism, “naturalism” and concept of labour as a metabolic mediation of nature are given due attention. while highly dependent upon marx’s “ecological” mind, without emphasizing contributions from more contemporary ecological thinkers, foster, clark and york reinforce their call for social scientists to interrogate capitalism as it intersects with the natural world. also significantly, the work charts disciplinary transformations and recent theoretical developments in the ecological sciences which have contributed to the genealogy of the sub-discipline of environmental sociology. book review: the people’s lawyer | 273 book review the people’s lawyer by albert ruben. new york: monthly review press, 2011. $17.95 us paper. isbn: 978-1-58367-237-2. pages: 1-200. reviewed by rania tfaily1 “my job is to defend the constitution from its enemies. its main enemies right now are the justice department and the white house.” (bill goodman, legal director of the center for constitutional rights, 2001) for about five decades, the center for constitutional rights (ccr) has waged significant legal, educational and public awareness battles to defend marginalized communities and to uphold rights guaranteed by the u.s. constitution and the universal declaration of human rights. since its inception, it was dedicated to progressive politics, social justice and social change. it branded itself as being in the service of the people’s movements whether it is civil rights, women’s rights, war against vietnam, and more recently campaigns against torture, renditions and indefinite detention. the ccr cases often set legal precedents. however, the impact of the ccr varied with times. during the 1990s, it suffered from a financial crunch that intensified tensions between the board and staff. these tensions which have been brewing for a number of years culminated in the staff’s seven weeks long strike. after a period of decline, the ccr saw its fortunes and profile increase following 9/11 and the war on terror which resulted in human rights violations of thousands of arabs and muslims. the center’s decision to defend the right to habeas corpus of guantanamo detainees was a turning point given that the crc often focused on civil cases, and it tended to represent people with whom it usually shared a common (leftist) political vision. the ccr’s decision to take on the government of the u.s. during a time of high patriotic fever was not without its risks, and a number of individuals and organizations withdrew their financial support. after a definite defeat in two lower courts, the center’s legal effort culminated in a surprising and significant win in 1 rania tfaily is an assistant professor of sociology in the department of sociology and anthropology at carleton university, ottawa. 274 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism rasul vs. bush in which the u.s. supreme court ruled 6 to 3 that guantanamo detainees have the right to access the federal courts. the ccr’s budget rose from $1.2 million in 2001 to $5.5 million following this crucial victory. albert ruben takes us through a condensed history of the ccr, from its humble beginnings to help lawyers in the south who were challenging racial segregation and the disenfranchisement of the voting rights of african americans, to its involvement in women’s rights movement, antiwar activism and more recently its defense of victims of the war on terror. ruben shows how the ccr pioneered the creative use of the law by adopting novel and often untested arguments to launch legal battles along with educational campaigns with the purpose of facilitating social change. the ccr defined success not only in terms of winning cases and setting legal precedents but also in terms of its ability to raise public awareness and galvanize social movements. ruben provides us with detailed synopsis of the lives of the center’s four founding fathers – arthur kinoy, morton stavis, william kunstler, and benjamin smith. he shows the significant impact that a handful of hardworking, motivated and committed professionals and activists can make. ruben’s book includes a detailed chapter about the ccr’s most significant cases classified under “international human rights and solidarity”, “government misconduct”, and “attacks on dissent”. it is obvious that ruben highly values the ccr and the fighting spirits, motivation and dedication of its founding fathers and staff. nevertheless, he exposes the struggles and the difficulties encountered in running the ccr. he does not shy away from including unflattering characteristics of the founding fathers. “the people’s lawyer” is a valuable contribution detailing the history of one of the most progressive american organizations. it also depicts work-related challenges that face progressive organizations that do not wish to conform to the capitalist/ corporatist work model. these include monetary compensation, decision-making process, board-staff relations, and gender and generational tensions. the book raises the important question of how best to facilitate social change and whether channeling the struggle through the courts and its lengthy litigation defuses and sets back social movements. on this point, however, it fails to provide a clear assessment and position. the book is written in a lively and engaging manner. it is definitely an interesting read for lawyers, activists and social scientists. however, the narrative of the book goes back and forth between different time book review: the people’s lawyer | 275 periods and different issues. in addition, it does not adequately address the social, political and legal context that prevailed in the united states at various periods. i would have appreciated a more chronological history coupled with an analysis of whether the ccr’s successes in the 1960s, 1970s and 1980s were byproduct of the social and political turmoil engulfing the united states at that time. this is relevant as one ponders the future of the ccr and the ability to challenge oppressive laws through the courts given the changing social and political environment. the dramatic (and negative) changes in the u.s. justice system have included draconian sentencing, expansion of state surveillance, increased prosecutorial power and particularly diminished judicial authority and oversight. the increase in the power of prosecutors (often at the expense of judges) coupled with draconian sentencing means that the accused (often poor and marginalized) are almost always compelled to accept plea bargains even if they were innocent since the consequences of convictions are severe. about 90% of criminal cases end in plea bargains without trials. recent journalistic articles in the new york times and the washington post paint a very dim picture of the u.s. justice system which is characterized by concealing exculpatory evidence, framing and entrapment, evidence manipulation, incompetent and flawed forensic analysis, and prosecutorial misconduct. as we contemplate the future of progressive organizations such as the ccr, it is important to take into account that the u.s. justice system is becoming increasingly repressive and that it is becoming harder to achieve significant social change through the courts. 248 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism book review activism that works edited by elizabeth whitmore, maureen g. wilson, and avery calhoun. halifax and winnipeg: fernwood publishing, 2011. $19.95 can, paper. isbn: 978-1-55266-411-7. pages: 1-184. reviewed by christine pich1 activism that works provides an important empirical and collaborative contribution towards literature on action research and social justice activism. in raising the key question – “[h]ow do we know when we’re making a difference?” (p.7) – the editors, through part of a larger collaborative project with nine social justice-oriented organizations, challenge us to think about what it means to be successful in activist work that contributes, in a broad sense, towards social change oriented by “social or environmental justice” (p.8). in partnering with a range of diverse organizations throughout canada – such as oxfam canada, the calgary raging grannies, and the social justice committee – an aim of this book was to provide activists from these organizations the opportunity to reflect upon their work in terms of what factors they believe constitute effectiveness and success, and how they know that they are making a difference. it is in this regard that terms such as ‘activism’ and ‘success’ take on broad and encompassing conceptual meanings. for example, ‘success’ is understood as that which is “described by activists themselves reflecting on their own work” (p.8). this relates to the central theme of the book, that is, in attempting to understand what constitutes ‘successful activism’ in complex contexts, there is no ‘right answer’ or ‘best practice’ when undertaking social justice oriented work. it is in this regard that the editors challenge how success is commonly perceived in terms of linear and tangible outcomes. in contrast, the editors encourage us to think about success on a different scale through the everyday work and successes experienced by a wide range of people (paid workers, volunteers, members of the community) involved within these organizations. the book is organized with the majority of the contents constituting stories from the organizations themselves (in no particular identified order), and with the editors writing the introductory and concluding 1 christine pich is a ph.d. student in the department of sociology and anthropology at carleton university in ottawa. her research interests are in the areas of occupational health, work and labour. book review: activism that works | 249 chapters. it is within the chapters written by the editors that the theoretical and methodological focus is discussed. within the introductory chapters they highlight the difficulties posed by neoliberal capitalism towards activist work. in this regard, they point to the potential of “emancipatory social inquiry” (p.20) in terms of collaborative work between researchers and social movements, and the knowledge coproduced from such efforts. to frame this discussion, they briefly draw upon the work of antonio gramsci (structural and conjunctural analysis; ideological hegemony), paulo friere (conscientization; praxis; participatory action research), and george smith (political activist ethnography). in the concluding chapters, the editors elaborate upon complexity theory, with particular reference to the work of brenda zimmerman (2000). this theory is understood as “a loose network of ideas, a set of mental models” (p.155) which challenges “linear, mechanistic ways of thinking” (p.155) that are outcome-oriented. the theoretical works drawn upon, especially the introduction of complexity theory, provide an intriguing framework towards understanding the complexities of ‘successful activism’. however, a tension in this regard was that they were only briefly drawn upon. it would have been interesting to delve into further discussion of, and identify any potential tensions between, the theoretical approaches. through the use of an appreciative inquiry (ai) lens emphasis is cast upon success and positive experiences, as well as the data sources generated, take a narrative form. this approach is well suited to frame the range of stories of what success means. for example, the disability action hall considers successful features of their work to include building a “sense of community, sense of pride and culture” (p. 53), while the calgary raging grannies highlight the ability to attain media coverage and energize themselves and others through humour and catchy songs. the main contribution of this book is that it highlights how, even in a hostile neoliberal capitalist climate, successes of varying degrees are experienced within the processes of working on social justice issues and that important work is being done on a day-to-day basis in this regard. this is particularly important as it challenges the contemporary orientation of many funding sources in their measures of ‘success’ wherein focus tends to be on readily identifiable results and quantitative reporting mechanisms. in addition, through the involvement of various organizations, this book provides the space for activists to tell their own stories with through creative means, such as a comic book style format in the chapter by the youth project. 250 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism while providing important contributions, the main tension with the book stems from the framing of some key concepts – such as activists, social movements, and social justice – which could have benefited from a more elaborated conceptual analysis as they were quite broad and encompassing. while the intent may have been to provide generous conceptual framings, more discussion towards the potential benefits and limitations of this approach would have been useful. in addition, while the focus of the book is on ‘success,’ and the ai approach is suitable toward achieving this aim, the editors note the assumption “that something works in every organization” (p.24). it would have been useful to provide some discussion of what would be considered as falling outside of notions of success and positive work. furthermore, while the editors introduce the organizations they have worked with within this project, what remained to be more clearly addressed is the methodological rationale for identifying and working with these particular organizations and not others. overall, whitmore et. al.’s edited book provides an important collaborative space for multiple voices to creatively share and reflect upon what they understand as effectiveness and success and the importance of recognizing everyday successes that do not neatly fit into concrete outcomes. with its creative and accessible style and structure, this book will be of particular interest for researchers who work in researchercommunity collaborative projects with the aim to co-produce knowledge, as well as a more general public and activist audience. book review: debt, the imf, and the world bank | 255 book review debt, the imf, and the world bank: sixty questions, sixty answers by eric toussaint and damien millet. new york: monthly review press, 2010. $17.95 us. isbn: 978-1-58367-222-8. pages: 1-361. reviewed by jillian l. curtin1 in their book, debt, the imf, and the world bank: sixty questions, sixty answers, eric toussaint and damien millet provide an extensive overview of the impact that debt has on highly indebted poor countries (hipcs). they show how debt inhibits hipcs from investing in infrastructure, health, education, and other development-oriented socialpolicies. the problem, they argue, is not just debt itself, but the capitalist global economic system that fuels it. this process contributes to an endless cycle of poverty and human suffering. the book is written for a general audience. it is organized in a way that showcases the causes of the cyclical debt crisis, the major actors involved, and ways of addressing the problems. it is especially proficient in outlining how private actors in the global financial system have had a negative impact on hipcs. throughout the book toussaint and millet display marxists overtones. their critique of the global financial system and the exploitive nature of the global trade system is accurate. they provide some “radical alternatives” to the current, broken system. however, many of their ideas are not overly radical. for example, their argument focusing on the elimination of structural adjustment programs (saps) is in line with many other experts in the field. in fact, this discussion on saps is the highlight of the book. toussaint and millet give an in depth explanation of the role saps have played in this debt crisis. they describe them as entities geared toward developing institutions and policies to allow private foreign investment into countries. this process shapes the structure of the domestic political economic policy in debtor countries. it gives lenders 1 jillian curtin is currently completing her ph.d. in political science at carleton university, with a focus on political economy. she specializes in governance of the global economy and the politics of private enterprise. she is also the co-founder and content manager of discourse magazine. 256 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism the ability to control indebted countries through conditionality which has helped to create a system of dependence, exploitation, and indirect rule. the use of saps not only interferes with sovereignty but implies that some countries lack the ability to rule themselves. toussaint and millet argue that any lending should consist of a simple transaction in which the lender provides money solely on the condition that the debtor will pay it back. conditions should not be applied. it is difficult to disagree with this position. interestingly, toussaint and millet do not call for the abolition of lending and debt all-together. however, they do argue against usury. they claim that private banks and investment houses in the global north have been making “easy money” off of the global south. these countries have paid back their debts – many times over – but the interest in some cases is so high that an endless cycles of debt ensues. they also argue against certain foreign “investment” in hipcs. they believe that often this “investment” is a cover which allows wealthier countries to take hipcs’ natural resources without sufficient financial compensation. this has had profound ecological and economic consequences for hipcs and is why the shift toward chinese investment – even though china infringes less on sovereignty – is simply exchanging one resource exploiter for another. they articulate that the process of external loans in exchange for resources does not help a hipc establish long-term human and/or economic development. it is the conditions under which lending and debt are currently conducted which is the crux of the problem. one problem with this book is the way in which it answers its own questions. while they ask some great questions, often their answers could be further unpacked. for example, in addition to their argument on how debt has redistributed financial resources from important social policies like health and education they make some important points about the impact of debt on resources and food sovereignty. but, the analysis of these problems is somewhat shallow. more space could have been dedicated to explaining why these areas are essential to meaningful development. the analysis is also problematic when they discuss the significance of self-determination and the right to self-governance. deeper, empirically grounded examples and a theoretical examination of the consequences of resources depletion and food sovereignty would have added more to their argument and allowed this book to make a deeper contribution to contemporary debates on development and debt. book review: debt, the imf, and the world bank | 257 a second problem is, at several points, the book borders on becoming a polemic. often the author’s choice of words is incendiary. they use loaded language to support their argument in areas where more empirically based explanations are desirable. this detracts from their overall argument. for example, they claim that the debt burden has “crushed all attempts” for hipcs to develop. in addition to the implication of hopelessness, the tenor of the phrase externalizes the responsibility of development and ignores any complicity amongst the governments of the hipcs. this is a problem found throughout the book. another issue with this work is that their solutions are only partly explained. they argue that much of the citizenry in hipcs are too poor to formally participate in the market. as such, only governments are able to redistribute wealth and provide the programs necessary for human and economic development. however, they do not adequately address the potential problems of economic corruption associated with authoritarian regimes and shell governments. their correlation between the elimination of debt and deterring the formation and maintenance of authoritarian regimes is weakly argued. the rationale toussaint and millet do provide – that the immediate forgiveness of debt acquired under dictators would deter external lenders from providing credit to dictators – counters their own call for the abolition of the current risk and confidence-based financial system. this is a logical inconsistency in the book. government control of economic assets often leads to dictatorships. toussaint and millet also fail to explain how wealth will be generated in these countries once debt is forgiven. aside from these problems toussaint and millet do provide a general overview of how the burden of debt is crippling development efforts in many countries. this is an ongoing crisis that has been overlooked in the wake of the current economic crisis that is preoccupying european and american politics. their question and answer and answer format makes their work easy to understand. this book provides an enticing argument for interested readers with little to no background in economics, politics, or development studies. 142 implications of the domestic role of women eileen saunders the feminist movement has posed a fundemental challenge to social scientists, a challenge reflected in the necessity of providing an analysis of the causes of the oppression of women. the response has been varied, with available models ranging from a focus on biological explanations to class analysis. i would argue, however, that we have not yet reached the point where we are able to integrate these various positions into an adequate analysis of the forms of oppression women have experienced and continue to experience, the sources of their oppression, the mechanisms by which it is maintained, and the means to eliminate it. the resolution of this "impasse" requires that we begin to fully examine the spheres of female activity and attempt to integrate our understanding of the social forces which shape female participation in society. as juliet mitchell has shown in her criticisms of socialist movements, we have failed to look at woman's role through the structures that compose it i production, reproduction, sexuality and socialization (mitchell, 1966). the value of her analysis i3 its ability to examine the position of wom«n historically in terms of their variable role within each structure. the difficulty, on the other hand, emerges in treating these categories as independent structures which are unrelated in origin. for this reason, r. bridenthal has argued that it is possible to fuse mitchell's latter three 143 structures into one, each representing an aspect of the reproduction of the species (bridenthal, 1976:3-5). one is then able to examine the situation of women through an analysis of their position in the productive sphere (as workers) and the reproductive sphere (as housewives and mothers). through an historical examination, one can discover the nature of the relationship between these spheres, and the implications this holds for the societal position of women. a beginning point in such an attempt is an examination of the structure of the reproductive sphere and the position it occupies under capitalist relations. using a marxist framework, w. seccombe has questioned toe role of household labour (i.e., reproductive) in the creation of value, and examines its linkages to the overall wage-relation system (seccombe, 1973). seccombe* s thesis is that sexual oppression emerged, with the advance of capitalism, due to the sexual division of labour: a division into an "industrial unit" and a "domestic unit" (1973»6). moreover, this development required the physical seperation of this workplace and the home (i will return to a discussion of this "division" in my discussion of the transition from a precapitalist mode to a capitalist mode of production). seccombe argues that the labour of the domestic unit has a dual nature. on the one hand, domestic labour is necessary labour because the commodities of capital require 1w additional labour (i.e., housework) before consumption. in the preparation of food for family consumption, the housewife's labour creates a use-value insofar as the product of her labour directly serves certain consumption needs. such labour also allows for the reproduction of the wage earner's labourpower (i.e., capacity for work, 1973»l /0« domestic labour thus creates value because "all labour produees value when it produces any part of a commodity that achieves equivalence in the market place with other commodities" (seccombe, 1973'9)domestic labour helps produce and reproduce labour power as a commodity. on the other hand, and here is where we begin to approach the dual nature of domestic labour, the marxist "law of value" cannot apply to labour in the reproductive sphere. there are two reasons for thisi first, domestic labour is not engaged in an exchange relation with capital, and second, it is unproductive because it produces no surplus value . in other words, because domestic labour has only a use-value, it has no direct relation to capital. it then becomes difficult to measure the value of such labour. for other commodities, this is unproblematic. for example, labour power as a commodity achieves its equivalence through the wage relation. but, since domestic labour is not exchanged on a market, it has no apparent exchange value . seccombe 's solution is to argue that the value of domestic labour is equivalent to that part of the worker's wage that goes to the maintenance of 1*5 domestic labour (1973«8-10). its value, in this sense is mediated by the wage transaction between capital and the wage earner. it is also for this reason that seccombe argues that one cannot speak of surplus value creation in reference to domestic labour. because the value of this labour is seen as equivalent to its maintenance costs, the possibility of an extraction of a surplus value from household labour by capital is rendered impossible under seccombe* s scheme. the housewife is assumed to receive the value she creates. he recognizes that a "mystification" of the wage relation occurs under capitalism. whereas wages are equivalent to the value of labour power, not the value produced by labour power, this is not the case with the relation between capital and 'the housewife. the value she produces is contained in the wage received by the wage earner. seccombe* s analysis is valuable in several respects. it represents needed insight into an area which marxists have tended to ignore in theoretical endeavors. moreover, his analysis of the mediation of the relation between capital and domestic labour by the wage transaction contains important implications regarding the "political potential" of housewives (1973 ! 21-23) . the problem however is that he does not really develop his argument tothe necessary point. it is useful to explicate the structure of domestic labour under capitalism, but this in itself is not sufficient. one must question the motivation behind the continuing reproduction ik6 of that structure in its present form. in other words, does domestic labour, in its privatized and unwaged form, serve a value to capital in addition to the simple use value it creates? i am really seeking to question the conception of household labour as non-productive, in the sense of creating no surplus value. a strict marxist application of the term surplus value blinds us to the value extracted by capital from domestic labour. the structure of the domestic sphere allows for the reproduction of class relations in various forms. these must be explicated before one can attempt to account for the reproduction of sexism in contemporary society. what i am suggesting is a reconceptualization of our understanding of surplus value creation so that we are not forced to deal only with those exchange transactions which occur on an open market. if one can demonstrate a value served by domestic labour in the direct reproduction of class relations, and the extraction of that value by capital, then it becomes possible to discuss the productivity of domestic labour. i will now discuss the role of domestic labour in the satisfaction of certain of capital's needs. first, capitalism cannot satisfy all a worker's needs through commodity production. these needs must however be met in order to maintain a passive working force. domestic labour becomes the forum for the satisfaction of these needs in that it has personal value which cannot be reproduced by socialized domestic labour. 147 the family and the role of the housewife provide an area where the male worker can achieve some sense of authority and control (which is otherwise lacking in his relation to capital). secondly, domestic labour realizes a higher standard of living for the worker than is realized in his actual wages. workers are paid a wage to cover the cost of maintaining their labour power. domestic labour is the activity which transforms that wage into usable goods. obviously, there are alternative methods of maintaining labour power: restaurants, laundries, tailors, etc. but it is cheaper for capital to maintain domestic labour than to give workers higher wages so that they can buy these services on a competitive market. the wage labour system is sustained by the socially necessary, but private, labour of housewives and mothers. child rearing, cleaning, laundry, maintenance of property, food preparation, reproduction, etc. are all necessary elements in the maintenance of life and the reproduction of the work force. in this sense, they are all aspects of the mode of reproduction. this sphere produces daily and generationally the labour needed by capital. fianlly, by maintaining an economically dependent, and therefore passive, individual within the family the industrial sector creates an individual who is easier to manipulate. historieally this has been the casei women have functioned as a cheap and passive reserve work force. this is reflected in their unequal wages, narrow choice of occupations, and ikb underrepresentation in trade unions. it is a situation which has been relativiely easy to maintain. she has no structural responsibility in the waged labour force. rather, her participation is seen as transitory, depending on the labour needs of the industrialized sector. reserve labour power is stored in the family, drawn upon when necessary, and then reabsorded when no longer needed. the position of women as unwaged privatized labourers in the family is reproduced outside of the family. they have traditionally been located in low wage positions in more or less marginal occupations. however, one must be careful not to view female wage labour as only transitory in nature. this is a problem in seccombe's analysis, as well as in that of other marxists who only deal with the housewife and ignore women as workers. the error is compounded when marxists attempt to find a ba;is for the unity between the working class and housewives. to see only her domestic labour or her position as wage earner as the source of unity is to ignore that women are often both domestic labourers and wage earners. the central feature of women under capitalism is not their position as domestic labourers, but rather their dual role . the task is to relate these two roles in a coherent fashion -something which marxists have not yet done. when marxist feminists deal with the issue of wage labour, they assume that their interests are synonymous with working class interests. this is not the case however, due to the contradictory nature of wage labour and 1^9 domestic labour, a contradiction contained in the female role. female wage labour is not synonymous with male wage labourj the former's economic position as domestic labourers has transformed their economic position as wage labourers. their increased proletarianization has not eliminated the gap between female and male workers. it is a question again of the specific oppression of women: this is an issue which is not dealt with by merely recognizing that women serve two roles. the key is to see the integration of these two roles, and the contradiction that integration poses for women. female labour is both privatized and socialised: she is both a domestic and an industrial unit. her status as worker reduces her isolation, but has done nothing to reduce the oppression of her privatized labour at home. her domination within the family is controlled by the male worker. granted, it was originally based on his relation to the means of production, but it has been maintained, even with the entry of women into industry. the solution is to look for the interplay of this dual role of women, a situation which has given rise to a tension between the productive sphere and the reproductive sphere. women are positioned historically in the center of this dialectic, and with advanced capitalism the opposing forces of production and reproduction have posed contradictions for women which demand a resolution. if one can isolate these 150 contradictions, then perhaps one can build a base for a successful feminist movement. the women's work study group (1976) has argued that these contradictions do in fact reflect "stress points" in the capitalist system. one needs to examine the historical emergence of these contradictions and the changing nature of the productive and reproductive spheres. i will ' briefly discuss three historical phases and the impact the changing roles of production and reproduction has had on the position of women. the historical phases are the stages of precapitalism, industrialization, and monopoly capitalism. in precapitalist societies, the family was the major productive unit in the economy. the female performed tha tasks of the rpproductive sphere (reproduction, health care, laundry, and so on), as well as the tasks associated with the material production of necessities. production was generally for immediate consumption, but also involved the market exchange of goods. there was a sexual division of labor at work, both categories of sexually divided tasks being regarded as valuable and socially necessary. moreover, both forms of labour were performed within the family unit. in fact, one could say that the productive and reproductive spheres maintained a symbiotic relationship, in that each sphere was dependent to a great extent on the labour which occured within the other sphere (bridenthal, 1976:5). it is only with capitalism that material production, organized socially in the form of wage labour, 151 became seperated from the reproductive tasks within the family. with this seperation of production and reproduction, the family relinquished its economic functions, and the household was devalued in terms of its socio-economic contribution. it was devalued precisely because it became isolated from the socialized production of surplus value. in the nineteenth century, with the rise of industry, commodity production shifted increasingly to the factory system. the shift fundementally altered the position of women. it shifted the nature of demand from skilled workers to low wage unskilled workers who could perform the tasks of running the machines. since physical strength was no longer as important a variable for this task, women were increasingly brought in as a cheap and readily available source of unskilled labour. however, the increased entry of women posed a serious threat to the bargainning position of the skilled male worker. it waa during this period that the ideology of the family unit was transformed. the focus shifted from its value as a productive unit to its value as an institution for securing personal happiness and fulfillment (zaretsky, 1976:^7-57). females were regarded as the key figures in that unit, thereby reinforcing motherhood as the feminine ideal. at the same time, the ideology defined the labour undertaken by women in this sphere as economically unproductive. such an ideology served two purposes. first, by upholding motherhood and the household as the "natural" and "true" position of women, the male worker 152 was able to restrict the entry of a large number of women into the labour market. at the same time, capital's needs were met. for those women who could not afford the "luxury" of remaining in the home, their ideological position as unproductive domestic labourers left them in a weak bargaining position upon entry into socialized production. capitalists were then able to maintain a cheap supply of labour, which could be easily laid off during economic recessions. women workers are the first to go when jobs are scarce. part of this is due to the ideology that a male worker has a family to support, whereas a female probably has a husband to support her. the sexist ideology of this period crossed classboundaries as well. whereas the vote was extended to all white men, regardless of social position, in the mid 1800's in north america, women , regardless of their economic standing, were refused the franchise (women's work study group, 1976:31). the increasing socialization of production, and its seperation from the more privatized reproductive sphere posed visible contradictions for women in this period. female workers were doubly exploited, both as domestic and as wage labourers, while bourgeois women were increasingly isolated in their separate sphere. the result was an upsurge of feminist protest. as zaretsky notes, the protest took two forms. first, the bourgeois women organized a protest against the enforced idleness of their domestic lives, and demanded access to middle class occupations. protest from working class women was focused 153 on a call for reforms in the industrial sphere so as to lessen the hardships of their working position (zaretsky, 1973s 37). unfortunately, both movements placed their hopes solely on the granting of the franchise; they assumed that contradictions could be resolved through legal means. as they quickly came to realize, this was not the case. the oppression of women was too integrally connected to the specific mode of production. the monopoly phase of capitalism which began to emerge in the early twentieth century is characterized by several developments: an increasing concentration of capital, a shift away from labour intensive industry, and a rise in profit rates which is accompanied by a need to maintain high consumption rates. it is a period marked by a rise in wages, which is controlled for by capitalists by a corresponding rise in commodity prices (see braverman, 197*0. furthermore, monopoly capitalists reorganized corporate facilities to spread the ideology of consumerism, and thereby ensure a market for their commodities. the family unit took on a new value for capital as a market for products. with increasingly sophisticated forces of production and ideological manipulation at their control, capitalists were able to cultivate that family market through an ideology of mass consumption. a cheap yet educated work force was required to perform the task of marketing the increasing mass of commodities. the result was a rapidly expanding white collar sector for which women provided an ideal source of labour. however, the rising expectations imposed by mass 15* consumerism often could not be met by a single wage earner in the family unit. to facilitate the entry of married women into the work force, the technology of capitalism produced new labour saving devices (automatic washers, dryers, freezers, tv dinners, and so on) which decreased the time spent on household tasks. these devices undoubtedly have had an impact on domestic labour; at the same time there has been a qualitative expansion of woman's work. due to the increased emphasis on consumption and standard of living, women have had more tasks to perform. her responsibilities in the reproductive sphere were not reduced: if anything, they were redefined in order to widen their scope. women now have to be child psychologists, aware consumers, and "efficient" housekeepers. what has occurred with monopoly capitalism is the development of a larger group of women who are engaged in labour in both the productive and reproductive spheres. women have entered the productive sphere largely in work tasks which are part of the reproductive sphere (i.e., teaching, nursing, social work, domestic service sectors). bridenthal argues quite convincingly that this phenomenon is indicative of an increasing shift of the mode of reproduction from the personal to the public forum (1976«6-8). while the labour within the family remains privatized, decisions and policy concerning the form and use of that labour are no longer in the woman's control. bridenthal 's discussion focuses on the increasing intervention of the capitalist system 155 into the reproductive sphere in order to ensure the control of the reproduction of the labour force. the increased entry of the female into socialized production transformed the area of reproductive labour. this in turn threatens the maintenance of the specific mode of production unless the former is controlled by capital. in other words, capital must on the one hand maintain the stability of the nuclear family (to ensure the personal happiness of the worker and obscure his alienation on the job), and on the other hand, it requires women as an available source of reserve labour. the structural contradiction of these needs has left women in advanced capitalism both socialized and privatized in their labour; both waged and unwaged. the contradictory nature of capitalist ideology becomes only too evident. the family unit is portrayed as a separate entity from the economic sphere. but in fact, the household as a productive and consumptive unit is integrally tied to certain economic needs of the system. the myth of the family as independent of the productive sphere is necessary if society is to maintain the notion that the personal life of the worker has an entirely self controlled meaning. because the family is organized around reproduction and consumption however, it is impossible to speak of family organization without considering the labour needs of capital. as already noted, monopoly capital relies on high rates of consumption and high commodity prices. these needs, in turn, force women into the work force 156 on an increasingly permanent basis in order to maintain the standard of living demanded by mass consumerism. this poses a challenge to the traditional position of the male as the wage earner, and to the authority that position has given him over the female. the result is an erosion of the traditional ideology of the family unit, though the demand by capital for such a unit remains. this is not to say that capital has reorganized its sexist ideology. on the contrary, it is reproduced as long as women receive lower wages and are concentrated in low-skilled occupations. however the transformation in the reproductive sphere (it is becoming less and less the primary position for women as greater numbers join the work force) makes visible the need for a transformation in the productive sphere. women are now both regular participants in the wage labour force and in the domestic labour force, yet still the ideology defines them in terms of housewives and mothers. the tension and contradiction inherent in their dual role is masked by a false separation of the two spheres. capital has mystified the place of women within capitalist production. it thus becomes the task of a revolutionary movement to "demystify" their position, and organize on the basis of an understanding of both spheres of female labour. 157 references braverman, harry 197^ labor and monopoly capital. new york: monthly review press. bridenthal, renate 1976 "the dialectics of reproduction and production in history." radical america 10 ( march-april ) . mitchell, juliet 1966 "women: the longest revolution." new left review uo(november-december) . seccombe, wallace 1973 "the housev/ife and her labour under capitalism. new left review 83( january-february) . women's work study group 1976 "loom, broom and womb: producers, maintainers and reproducers." radical america 10(marchapril) . zaretsky, eli 1973 "capitalism, the family and personal life." socialist revolution, 1 3lk{ january-april) , and 1 5 ( may-june ) . climate change and crisis | 215 climate change and crisis: in dialogue with simon dalby — jen wyre jen wrye1 (jw): since the economic collapse, spending on environmental programs has decreased around the globe. can you comment on the similarities and differences in such reductions between canada and the u.s. or eurozone? simon dalby2 (sd): in general environmental programs may have suffered but clearly european states remain much more concerned about environmental matters than at least the federal governments in both the u.s., given republican agendas, and canada, given the conservatives’ agenda. however, that said, other jurisdictions do have a very varied response. california’s climate change agenda is completely different from washington’s even if austerity is the order of the day there. if you count in such things as obama’s green jobs initiatives then things look rather different in the u.s.. europeans, and even ontario in the canadian federation, are working on initiatives that, while not traditional environmental regulations, are nonetheless important in terms of the larger climate change issue in particular. jw: how ideologically driven are cuts to environmental spending, canada’s abandonment of kyoto commitments, etc.? are the circumstances 1 jen wrye recently completed her ph.d. at the department of sociology and anthropology, carleton university. she now teaches in the humanities and social sciences department at north island college in courtenay, british columbia. 2 simon dalby holds the cigi chair in the political economy of climate change, and is professor of geography and environmental studies at wilfrid laurier university. his published research deals with climate change, political ecology, geopolitics, global security, environmental change, militarization and the spatial dimensions of governance. he is co-editor of rethinking geopolitics, the geopolitics reader, the journal geopolitics, and author of creating the second cold war, environmental security, and security and environmental change. 216 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism a reflection of the conservative government mainly or do you see these tendencies as part of broader transnational and neoliberal restructuring? sd: the canadian conservative government is particularly clear that its agenda is ideologically driven. yes, there is a certain structural dimension in the canadian political economy as resource extraction is a key part of the national economy. canada is also home, through both the toronto and vancouver stock exchanges, to many of the largest international mining companies. some of these companies are more concerned about their environmental records than the conservatives apparently are, and indeed if environmental standards are abandoned in canada, exporting may actually get more complicated given international standards on many things such things as food safety standards. abandoning kyoto is clearly ideologically driven, but in line with the anti-multilateralism of the conservatives, expressed in foreign minister john baird’s formulations of enlightened sovereignty quite as much as its anti-environmental agenda. in the so called stimulus package the federal government could have chosen to push hard on renewable energies, sensible public transit initiatives in canadian cities and other projects, and fund these by removing subsidies to the petroleum sector, but they ignored these opportunities to shift investment to build green projects. instead canada is portrayed as an energy superpower given its tar sands, although how much of this oil will make its way to international markets remains unclear given the difficulties with various pipeline projects. jw: can you highlight some of the environmental consequences to austerity we might expect in canada? for example, which communities might be impacted most? sd: if austerity is about reducing environmental reviews of numerous proposed mines, pipeline and other resource extraction “developments” then clearly communities close to such developments obviously are most likely to have to deal directly with the disruption of developments and subsequent habitat disruption and pollution issues. in terms of forgone green building initiatives and modernization of infrastructure then the effects are likely to be widespread. the big unknown in the next few years is of course how much of the reduction of federal activity will be taken up by the provinces. that depends on provincial politics in complicated ways. but clearly the gutting of federal environmental science programs and environmental reviews isn’t about austerity; that at least climate change and crisis | 217 is clearly an ideologically driven agenda to silence the production of information that might challenge the priority of promoting the resource extraction sector as the key to canadian prosperity. jw: there seem to be conflict between an austerity agenda that diminishes environmental spending on one hand, and the need, as the frequency and scale of environmental catastrophes increases, to prioritize the environment politically on the other. what types of responses might we anticipate to these events if state spending is retracting? sd: gradually it is dawning on policy makers in municipalities and provinces that the federal government can’t be relied on to help in ways that it used to. pretending that companies and contractors can step in to deal with floods or oil spills in the absence of resources and coordination from the federal government is a very dangerous way to conduct public policy. the neoliberal ideology that markets can provide and that government should have no role in many aspects of public life leads to the reduction of facilities and capabilities in ways that may imperil people in coming years. can municipalities and provinces agree to pool resources to compensate for the withdrawal of federal support? that remains to be seen, but as all the predictions of climate change make clear, extreme events are becoming more frequent. but some of the most important things that need to be done to prepare for what is coming are simple practical matters of sensible land use planning and building resilient emergency systems and infrastructure. if short-term market priorities continue to be the priority the prognosis isn’t good, especially if self-regulation in the construction sector leads to shoddy construction and bad planning decisions. marketizing risk in terms of catastrophe bonds, and relying on insurance for many things is logical if markets and adaptation are the policy priority. this leaves those without financial resources especially vulnerable when government programs are withdrawn. jw: the united nations anticipates that austerity will reduce environmental spending by up to $50 billion in the foreseeable future. what do you think this will mean for global human security, particularly in the global south? sd: this issue has to be handled very carefully given that some of the projects, such as community forestry projects funded by various 218 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism international development schemes, are dubious both in terms of their environmental and local community impacts. forestry plantations that are claimed to be carbon sinks are not always helpful to local communities and indeed one might argue that canceling some of these might actually be beneficial in many parts of the south. if the cuts affect urban infrastructure, flood prevention measures and such things then the security of many poor people are further imperiled. jw: how do you think ideas about a ‘depressed’ economy and austerity affect people’s opinions about environmental problems? does austerity shift public attention from environmental degradation and sustainability? for example, do we stop thinking in terms of reducing our dependency on non-renewable resources, curbing resource use, or funding green initiatives and more in terms of maintaining our current lifestyle as is? sd: constraints often have perverse consequences for the environment; reduced economic activity frequently reduces pollution and resource use. it may also prevent modernization projects that use cleaner technologies, meaning that old polluting technologies are used longer than might otherwise be the case. traditionally hard times have meant environmental matters slip down the list of political priorities; environment being seen as a matter of a luxury for affluent times. but the relationships are never that simple; and efficiency responses often reduce resource consumption and hence pollution. jw: which strategies might you expect to be most successful in resisting cuts to environmental investments? sd: in the canadian context electing tom mulcair as prime minister might seem to be the most obvious strategy! but clearly some of the ecological modernization arguments are important. efficiency matters in things like heating bills and electricity consumption for schools, hospitals and numerous parts of the public sector. conservation in such matters helps in dealing with controlling costs in all aspects of economic activity. what seems to be happening across the globe is that numerous institutions are starting to think much more carefully about their fuel use in terms of travel budgets and the running costs of factories, housing and numerous other things. here in fact neo-liberal mantras about efficiency do make environmental sense. but austerity will no doubt affect new innovative investments that might be cleaner alternatives to existing systems. climate change and crisis | 219 the key to all this remains the ability of the political left to articulate a clear vision of a more just future that is also one that uses less resources than the production systems of the past. in times of austerity unions are often politically boxed into fighting to protect existing jobs, even in “dirty” industries rather than trying to articulate a larger agenda of green jobs and public investments. this is what many green parties have tried to promote, but often ended up too close to the market ideologies of neo-liberalism, and too focused on the narrow technicalities of environment to produce a convincing alternative narrative that can challenge the ideologies of neoliberalism combined by the re-articulation of citizenship in terms of consumption and “life-style”. challenging this discourse of “entitlement” remains a key ideological task for those who think that a more just and less destructive mode of political economy is both necessary and possible. symposium on brave rman between marxist orthodoxy and critical theory: comments on brave rman' s labor and monopoly capital michael burawoy one of the remarkable features of harry brave rman' s labor and monopoly capital has been its appeal to a wide range of different groups. it is used for courses in universities at both graduate and undergraduate level and in a variety of departments. it is used in community colleges, in trade union schools, in all sorts of study groups among workers and professionals. it is clearly destined to emerge as one of the giants of the marxist tradition. but it will not be confined to this tradition, since it has caught the imagination of non-marxists as much as of marxists. not surprisingly, therefore, labor and monopoly capital can be read in many different ways, and today i want to place it in the context of marxist debate. it is curious to note that widely divergent forms of marxism have embraced labor and monopoly capital as a pillar in their own tradition. in this book they have all found confirmation of their own position. in part this may reflect the fact that labor and monopoly capital is one of the first attempts to rewrite volume one of capital in the light of a century of development in both marxism and capitalism. however, an equally important reason for its appeal among divergent marxisms lies in its combination of themes from orthodox marxism with themes from critical theory. thus paul sweezy a relatively orthodox marxist can write that in terms of theory there is very little that is new in this book, while critical theorists have embraced it as a major theoretical contribution in the tradition of lukacs, adorno, horkheimer, marcuse and others. in this talk i propose to argue, like critical theorists, that the novelty of labor and monopoly capital lies in alternate routes harnessing their ideas to the understanding of monopoly capitalism through the examination of the labor process. but i shall also argue that this novelty is the very feature that poses an obstacle to braver-man's understanding of the nature of monopoly capitalism. what is this critical component in braverman? the subtitle of the book "the degradation of work in the twentieth century" indicates a critique in the obvious sense of the negative connotation of "degradation." but it involves another element, namely the notion of an alternative to the nature of work as we know it today. this refers not merely to an alternative in the past but more significantly to an alternative for the future. to critique, then, is to seek out the unrealized potential in the present and to point to the gap between what is and what could be. critique declares that what exists is not natural, inevitable or necessary but the product of very definite conditions which are not themselves immutable. thus, braverman attributes the degradation of work and the commodifi cation of life in general to the domination of capital. it is not only that work under monopoly capitalism becomes fractionalized into meaningless tasks but market forces invade all arenas of life turning relations among people into relations among things. even the family is "stripped for action in order to survive in the market society." in the remainder of this talk i shall argue that this critical component in braverman's analysis, while offering an appealing and plausible description of monopoly capitalism, only expresses rather than reveals the forces at work in an advanced capitalist society. first, his critique tends to interfere with the understanding of control characteristic of the capitalist labor process. second, it allows him to leave out of his analysis the political and ideological aspects of work. third, the form of critique allows him to ignore j symposium on braverman different forms of struggles as forces shaping the labor process. fourth, his conception of the capitalist totality prevents him from understanding how it reproduces itself. fifth, his point of critique leads him to portray socialism as a reversion to the past. sixth, and finally, braverman misses the specificity of the conditions of which labor and monopoly capital is a product, namely the specificity of monopoly capitalism in the united states. in all these respects, i shall argue, braverman 's analysis is limited by his critique but let me stress it is not critique per se but the particular critique which braverman adopts that poses as an obstacle to the understanding of monopoly capitalism. 1 . capital ist control to engage in critique is to evaluate and this involves the adoption of a standpoint, that is a point of critique. there was a time when marxists were unanimous in taking the standpoint of the proletariat. the position and interests of the proletariat provided a unique basis for understanding the capitalist totality. this optimism has lapsed as the working class of the advanced capitalist society has appeared to lose the revolutionary potential it may have had and as it has become involved in various forms of reactionary politics. critical theory has been left equivocating over its standpoint. in contrast to this studied skepticism braverman makes his point of critique unambiguously clear. it is the craft worker. moreover, it is not the craft worker dislocated from any historical context but the craft worker of early capitalism that braverman takes as a point of departure. with the rise of monopoly capitalism skill is expropriated from the craft worker and placed in the hands of the agents of capital. mental and manual labor are systematically divided or more precisely, as braverman puts it, there is a systematic separation of alternate routes conception and execution. braverman constitutes this development as the organizing principle of the labor process and social structure of monopoly capitalism. the separation of conception and execution is identified as the control peculiar to the capitalist labor process in general. however, one cannot get at what is fundamental to the capitalist labor process or capitalist control by looking at variations within capitalism as braverman does. what is fundamental to capitalist control is what all forms of capitalist control share and this can only be understood by contrast to forms of control under non-capitalist modes of production. there are a number of possibilities. one could examine the labor process under some pre-capitalist mode of production or pre-capitalist modes of production in general or one could draw upon notions of "control" or absence of control under socialism. unfortunately, but not surprisingly, our notions of socialism tend to be vague and too restricted by what we don't like about capitalism to be of much use as an analytical tool. rather 1 prefer to turn to the feudal mode of production and to begin from a conventional understanding of its labor process. while there is no time to enter into details here, by adopting feudalism as a point of departure the significant feature of capitalist control becomes the simultaneous obscuring and securing of surplus. whereas under feudalism surplus is pumped out of the direct producers through rent, is transparent and therefore has to be legitimated, under capitalism the existence of that surplus is obscured and this poses the problem of ensuring its existence. only when one has posed the question of capitalist control in such a general way can one return to the issue of the relationship of the separation of conception and execution to the capitalist labor process. we can ask, for example, about the limits on the separation 6 y symposium on braverman of conception and execution. thus, one might argue that if this separation is pushed too far then the securing of surplus becomes problematical, whereas if it is not pushed far enough the obscuring of surplus becomes problematical. in addition, the precise limits on the separation of conception and execution will themselves depend on certain historical conditions, revolving around the level of political and ideological as well as economic struggles. my first point, then, is that in taking the particular standpoint of the craft worker, braverman mistakes what is but a particular expression of the capitalist labor process for its essence. 2. the political and ideological aspects of the labor process in his concern for critique braverman quite deliberately restricts his analysis to the objective aspects of the labor process. the elimination of subjectivity is part and parcel of his critical analysis. under capitalism we lose control over the labor process, indeed over our lives in general and history is made behind our backs according to the imperatives of capital accumulation. but braverman not only speaks of control in this negative sense. he also speaks of it in the positive sense of extracting surplus labor time, compelling or persuading people to work hard enough to produce not merely the equivalent of their wage but in addition a surplus which can then be realized by the capitalist as profit. such control, however, presupposes the existence of a minimal consent to capitalist relations and this can be only understood through the study of the "subjective" components of the labor process, or what i shall call its ideological and political aspects. in other words, the very objective braverman sets for himselfto explain the generation of surplus under capitalism is incompatible with a critique that restricts the analysis of work to its "objective" component. alternate routes what, then, are the political and ideological dimensions of the labor process? again i cannot enter into details now, suffice to say that the political dimension refers to maintenance or reproduction of what i call the relations in production, that is the immediate production relations or the relations at the point of production among workers, supervisors, etc. on the shop floor. the ideological dimension refers to the production of experience, in particular the experience of the relations in production, how workers experience their position in the productive process and how their interests emerge out of the organization of work. in other words, the study of the political and ideological aspects of the labor process allows us to understand how surplus is produced through the organization of struggles and consent at the point of production. it is precisely in this area that industrial sociology sheds light on the labor process and the experience it produces. yet, braverman dismisses this excellent body of literature because it concerns itself with subjective responses to work, with modes of adaptation to the objectifying features of industrial labor. he rejects industrial sociology, therefore, because it illuminates the very processes which are crucial to the understanding of capitalist control. for it is in the attempt to cope with, to compensate for the inherent deprivation in capitalist work that laborers generate a world of their own which shapes the ideological effects of work, which explains how workers submit to or resist the separation of conception and execution on the one hand and consent to the production of surplus on the other. to dismiss industrial sociology, as braverman does in the name of his critique, is to miss the fact that it not only conceals but also expresses an underlying reality. it is for marxists to appropriate the "rational kernel" of sociology by placing it in a marxist framework. 8 symposium on braverman 3. struggles and competition it is not only that braverman gives short shrift to day to day adaptation but he also allows little room for the types of struggle which shape the movement of capital. instead capital flows from one arena to the next with its own inexorable logic and similarly the separation of conception and execution invades all aspects of social life. resistance is reduced to a mere friction a derivative and ineffectual response which does not affect the direction or pace of change. insofar as braverman does point to a motor of this movement, it is the unilateral power of the capitalist class. this would appear to rest on three assumptions. first, it presumes that the capitalist class identifies its interests as lying in the separation of conception and execution. second, it presumes that the capitalist class or its agents have the power to implement those interests, that is they have the power to enforce the separation of conception and execution against resistance from other classes. third, it presumes that the separation of conception and execution as a mode of "control" is actually in the interest of all or at least some of the fractions of the capitalist class. i find all three assumptions to be problematical. historically, there have been occasions when capitalists have not identified their interests as lying in the separation of conception and execution; they have not always had the power to expropriate skill and there have been times when such expropriation was at odds with their interests, when it created more trouble than it was worth. an alternative approach would be to look upon changes in the labor process as the outcomes of struggles between capital and labor on the one hand and competition among capitalists on the other. it is the particular constellation of struggle and competition that shapes managerial strategies and leads to the introduction of new forms of alternate routes control in the labor process. it is only in this way that we can begin to explain why taylorism or mechanization are introduced in different places at different times. moreover, such changes have had the effect of reorganizing struggle and competition and hence to further changes in the labor process. at the same time one should not make the mistake of regarding the managerial class or managerial group within a single firm as a monolithic entity. it is itself composed of different levels (shop floor, middle and top management) as well as different fractions (departments) which compete with each other with immediate effects on the organization of work. in avoiding the study of changing patterns of competition and struggle braverman has difficulty in developing an adequate notion of the periodization of the capitalist labor process. what he offers is the coincidence of the emergence of monopoly capitalism, taylorism and the scientific-technical revolution. however, it is by no means clear that they all occurred at once. rather it has to be posed as a question for historical research as to when taylorism and mechanization appeared and where and how their timing related to the rise of the large corporation. to do this it is also necessary to have an adequate picture of the labor process prior to the rise of the large corporation, that is the labor process under competitive capitalism. at best braverman presents a false comparison between monopoly capitalism as characterized by the systematic separation of conception and execution and competitive capitalism as the lost paradise of craft autonomy. obviously neither picture is adequate even as an approximation. the transition from competitive to monopoly capitalism refers to the emergence of the "monopoly" sector of the large corporations. what was the nature of the labor process during this transitional phase and to what extent was the labor process itself responsible for the 10 symposium on braverman capital and so on, that offe, habermas, o'connor, man del , castells and others find the sources of various crises. while this is no place to enter into a discussion of their studies, it is important to note that it is in the analysis of the conditions of. existence of capitalism, how it persists, how it is at all possible that braverman offers nothing and thereby gives the impression of the permanence of capitalism. the alternative to braverman's expressive totality is to examine how the different parts of a social formation are functionally interrelated to ensure its continuity over time. moreover, in pursuing such a "reproduction" analysis one can also explore the reproduction of contradictions that are inherent in the social formation. one is led to view parts not merely as expressions of a single dominant principle but, in addition, as possessing a certain coherence and logic of their own. however, just as braverman's critique, as reflected in the expressive totality, is by itself inadequate so the reproduction analysis of the structured totality is equally unsatisfactory in that it disguises itself in some neutral garb without posing the problem and potential of socialism. 5. socialism so what shall we mean by socialism? braverman's notion of socialism stems from his point of critique and therefore involves the reunification of conception and execution. although he vehemently denies it, his critique taken as it is from within capitalism leads in the direction of the resurrection of his lost paradise of the craft worker. perhaps it might have been more useful if braverman had distinguished between the reunification of conception and execution at the individual level job control and at the collective level. the latter notion is more compatible with the idea of society in which history is made consciously through a genuine collective organization 11 alternate routes of production, distribution and consumption. braver-man's somewhat limited vision of socialism is linked to his notion of technology as neutral. it is in connection with the role of forces of production in the development of capitalism and the transition to socialism that braverman rejects critical theory at its most powerful and embraces orthodoxy at its weakest. although there are places which suggest the opposite, he tends to argue that there is nothing inherent in capitalist technology and machines which prevents the realization of socialism. to the contrary, with a few exceptions such as the assembly line, advanced capitalist machines can be harnessed to relations of production under socialism. capitalist relations of production make themselves in the factory not through the imperatives of machine technology but through the organization of relations around machines. this view is at odds with a stream of thought associated with critical theory, that capitalist machines themselves embody capitalist relations of production; they themselves carry with them technical imperatives incompatible with the notion of emancipatory work. thus, for marcuse socialism must inaugurate its own technology and machinery and not import that which is most advanced under capitalism. having said that, then we can no longer assert that the major contradiction and developmental tendency of capitalism rests in the expansion of the forces of production. to the contrary under such view the forces of production rather than undermining the relations of production, reinforce those relations. in marxist literature this is now a common place observation. 6. the specificity of capitalism in the united states labor and monopoly capital is a product of a particular time and place. it reflects the very real power of capital in the united states during the third quarter of the twentieth century. but this domination 12 symposium on braverman of capital is not something to be taken as given but, as i have already suggested, its presuppositions should themselves become the object of study. indeed, the more powerful that domination appears to be, the more important it is to unmask it, to reveal its premises and to place it in its political and economic context. in other words we must examine the specificity of capitalism in the united states its origins, development and reproduction rather than projecting its attributes as the attributes of the capitalist mode of production in general. there are a number of conventional explanations for the distinctive strength of capital in the united states. the supposed absence of a feudal mode of production also meant the absence of what gramsci referred to as viscous sedimentations that might resist capitalist hegemony. the corporate liberal thesis argues for the existence of an enlightened bourgeoisie, constituted during the progressive era, which cemented the dominant classes and organized the incorporation of the working classes. other theories focus on the open frontier or the successive waves of immigrants that divided the working class into antagonistic ethnic and racial segments thus facilitating the domination of capital. here i want to suggest an alternative approach which might be of more use in understanding the specificity of the labor process in the united states. the critical factor, i would suggest, in shaping the development of the labor process in different capitalist social formations is the relative timing of unionization and mechanization. in contrast to the united states, where mechanization preceded large scale unionization, in britain mechanization could only proceed in the face of powerful resistance presented by an already organized working class. indeed, to this day workers on the shop floor are more militant and exercise a greater control over the labor process than 13 alternate routes their counterparts in the united states who never built a strong trade union movement to resist mechanization. in exploring the relative timing of unionization and mechanization one is examining the specific constellation of competition and struggle as it shapes the development of the labor process. in this way one can begin to explain variations in the labor process over time both within and between different countries. rather than attributing variations to positions on a continuum of becoming or to some spiritual lag we explore the very real political and economic forces that determine variations in the labor process and in this way gain a sense of the limits of the possible and the conditions for the transcendence of capitalism. 14 978-1-926958-01-9 133 culture political poetry lyle daggett1 “political” poetry. all human activity is political because it takes place in a context — the context of history. sending someone a recipe for crab meat salad is one thing if you work food prep in a restaurant kitchen. it means something else if you’re nancy reagan. poets have been political, in some sense of the word, from the earliest beginnings to the present. enheduanna, sumerian poet, priestess of the moon goddess inanna, the earliest poet whose name is known. the chinese government compiled collections of popular folk songs — for example, the shih ching, the book of songs — as a way of learning something about what the people were thinking. (did nixon listen to bob dylan or joan baez or pete seeger? does george bush listen to billy bragg or tracy chapman or rap music?) homer was political. (george bush on the walls of troy.) the bhagavad gita (which j. robert oppenheimer quoted as he watched the first atomic bomb explode in the new mexico desert) was and is political. the plays of aeschylus and sophocles and euripedes were defining forces in greek society. dante and shakespeare were all political. (if dante were writing today, who would he consign to the ninth circle of hell?) the great flowering of art and culture in medieval spain grew originally from the founding of a new umayyad dynasty in exile by survivors of the conquest of damascus by the abbasids. the trouveres and troubadours of medieval france lived in a time of constant upheaval and displacement and continuously shifting political alliances, in which most if not all of them were intimately involved. (many died during the wholesale slaughter that took place during the albigensian crusades, following which troubadour poetry essentially came to a halt.) 1 this work was first published by pemmican press. political poetry 134 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research chaucer was political, tu fu (or du fu) was political, murasaki shikibu was political. andrew marvell, william blake, shelley, keats, byron, whitman, rubén darío, josé martí, yosano akiko. political, in at least some sense of the word. what we’re talking about here is something more specific. we’re talking about poetry that expresses or reflects — either explicitly or at least by suggestion — politics that are left-wing, working-class, populist, or of a similar character. how to combine politics with creative work remains an unsettled question on the political left. this is not simply a question of socialist or communist realism versus whatever else. the widespread stereotype of socialist realism emphasizes the huge public portraits and statues of lenin, stalin, mao, etc., and maybe allows for some murals and poster art of muscle-bound workers in factories and rosy-cheeked starry-eyed young men and women gazing off at the bright horizon of the future. this, again, is the stereotype. but it should be patently obvious that public portraits and monument sculpture, poster art, and so on, comprise only a portion of (and not necessarily the best) of a culture’s art. we cannot judge the effectiveness of socialst realism (or any other artistic movement or tendency of the political left) based only on the more mediocre or homogenized examples. should we judge the art of capitalist societies based only on norman rockwell and mount rushmore? should we judge american literature based on mcguffey’s reader? are these the basis for the prevailing critical standards advocated by the literature and art departments at leading universities? for every norman rockwell there’s a diego rivera, a david siqueiros, a walter crane, a sue coe; for every edgar guest and joyce kilmer there’s a thomas mcgrath, a muriel rukeyser, a hugh macdiarmid. some people argue that there is much badly written political poetry — that much of it reads like a political pamphlet chopped into line breaks, or sing-song rhyming doggerel — and that this proves that political subject matter is not suited to poetry. but there is also much badly written love poetry, badly written poetry about religion, nature, and every other subject. do we then conclude that love, religion, nature, etc., are also unsuitable subjects for poetry? do hallmark greeting cards invalidate the work of dante and shakespeare and shelley and wordsworth? journalism reports facts; poetry tells the truth. in our time much political discourse in english — including discourse on the political left — is weighted with high-sounding rhetoric, with the greco-roman vocabulary of philosophy, psychology, and the other social sciences. one of our tasks, when writing about political subject matter (or any other subjects) is to make decisions about the vocabulary we use. 135 there is nothing wrong with using, in a poem, words such as “capitalism,” “working class,” “imperialism,” “revolution,” etc. the challenge is to ground such language in the concrete physical texture and detail of the world we live in from day to day, to reclaim it from the bourgeois abuse and alienation it has suffered, to give it the life and meaning it can actually have. we are not talking about merely taking a political speech or pamphlet, or a set of theoretical statements, and simplistically grafting them onto the skeleton of a poem — as if writing a poem were an act of taxidermy. it’s difficult to write a love poem if you’ve never been in love, or to write a poem about nature if you’ve never touched a tree. similarly, it can be difficult to write a good political poem if you’ve never marched in an anti-war demonstration, or faced a platoon of police in riot gear preparing to charge, or tried to pay rent or medicals when you’ve been unemployed for six months. the best examples of good left-wing political poetry are written out of an organic understanding of the politics, and out of a passionate involvement in the political movements of the time and place in which the poet lives. poetry of the political left from the twentieth century has developed along several currents or tendencies. my intention here is not to define rigid categories but to give examples of some of the possibilities poets have explored. though one or two of the poets i’ve named below might not strictly be considered politically left, all have at least shown a general outlook in their work that is populist, workingclass, anti-fascist, radically democratic, or of a similar character. 1. poetry rich in metaphor and imagery, poetry that works mainly be evoking feeling and sensory experience (rather than by elaborating intellectual argument or rhetorical appeal). example poets might be pablo neruda (usually), paul éluard, lorca, yosano akiko, mahmoud darwish, dale jacobson, rené depestre. sometimes verging on surrealism, as with éluard and lorca and depestre. 2. poetry that is agitational in tone, spare in imagery and metaphor, working by the kinetic energy of public speech. examples are bertolt brecht, mayakovsky, sol funaroff, langston hughes, césar vallejo in spain, take this cup from me. 3. poetry similar to the second type above but with a quieter voice, more personal, direct face-to-face speech rather than public oratory. examples are nazim hikmet, otto rené castillo, roque dalton, claribel alegría, maria aliger, anna swir, joy harjo sometimes, carl sandburg, luis j. rodríguez often, faiz ahmed faiz. 4. poetry that derives from or consciously imitates folk song. examples include brecht (sometimes), thomas mcgrath (sometimes), josé martí, hugh macdiarmid occasionally, langston hughes, naomi replansky at times. 5. poetry that is essentially traditional or classical lyric in tone (whether or not employing the external forms — sonnets, quatrains, etc.). examples are thomas political poetry 136 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research mcgrath (most characteristically), louis aragon, miguel hernández, rafael alberti, mao tse-tung [or mao zedong], william blake (in the shorter lyric poems), rubén darío, yannis ritsos, nancy morejón, don gordon, olga cabral, nelly sachs. 6. poetry that communicates by its rhetorical strength, poetry of ecstatic utterance. similar to type 2 above but with more elevated language. examples are william blake (in the “prophetic” poems), léopold senghor, walt whitman, kenneth fearing, yannis ritsos in some of his longer poems, anuradha mahapatra, joy harjo sometimes, dennis brutus, janice mirikitani, muriel rukeyser. 7. poetry that communicates mainly by intellectual argument or statement. examples are w. h. auden, edwin rolfe, jack beeching. 8. poetry that is documentary or journalistic in tone and method. examples are agostinho neto, javier heraud, leonel rugama, zöe anglesey (often), yannis ritsos (sometimes), anna swir (sometimes), nazim hikmet especially in his booklength poem human landscapes from my country. 9. poetry that works by humor or satire, or by an overall humorous or satirical tone. examples include kenneth patchen (often), thomas mcgrath now and then, kenneth fearing from time to time, mayakovsky often. obviously none of the poets named above wrote purely in the manners or styles outlined here. all have written poetry that fluidly combines the various approaches described above, and are certainly not limited to the possibilities given here. the above list is, again, intended to suggest some of the existing possibilities, not to limit or define rigidly. let us state here for the record that political correctness, understood properly, is a good thing. the expression “politically correct” originally meant “politically (and/or ethically/morally) the right thing to do.” it became a little confusing, sometimes, to talk about what was “politically right” because it sounded a little bit like “the political right” (who are, of course, politically wrong). so people got into the habit of saying “politically correct” instead, which sounded a little pompous sometimes but tended to be less confusing. to write poetry with political content that is left-wing, working-class, populist, or of a similar nature, is the right thing to do. the examples above make it clear that it is thoroughly possible to write poetry that has progressive political content and that is well-written. the fact is that leftwing political poetry, taken as a whole, is better poetry than poetry in which the poet has tried to leave politics out of it, or in which the poet has deliberately written from a right-wing perspective (i suppose a few examples of the latter do exist). we should have no hesitation about saying this — not, obviously, as absolute decrees from olympus, but as acts of affirmative belief: carl sandburg wrote better poetry than ezra pound. muriel rukeyser wrote better poetry than t. s. eliot. thomas mcgrath wrote better poetry than robert lowell. langston hughes 137 wrote better poetry than wallace stevens. gwendolyn brooks wrote better poetry than marianne moore. mayakovsky wrote better poetry than akhmatova or mandelstam. brecht wrote better poetry than rilke. otto rené castillo and leonel rugama wrote better poetry than octavio paz. etheridge knight wrote better poetry than john berryman. sharon doubiago and joy harjo and dale jacobson and luis rodríguez and nellie wong write better poetry than jorie graham or marvin bell or c. k. williams or billy collins or sharon olds. we don’t need the ruling class (or its representatives in arts and letters) to tell us whether or not we’re good poets. the record of our poetry, and the history from which it arises, speaks for itself. we reject “literary” standards that preclude politics as acceptable or essential subject matter. we belong in the real world of the living — breathing, changing, revolutionary — and the real world (and the poetry that grows from it) is the only answer we need to give. political poetry 138 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research whole book pdf 978-1-926958-01-9 145 movie review eyes wide shut, director: stanley kubrick; scenario: stanley kubrick, frederic raphael; starring: nicole kidman (alice harford), tom cruise (dr. william ‘bill’ harford), madison eginton (helena harford), sydney pollack (victor ziegler), 1999/usa, 159 min., adaptation from traumnovella by arthur schnitzler. reviewed by: bora erdagi1 eleven years after its release, it is worth remembering stanley kubrick’s last film eyes wide shut for its critique of dehumanized (bourgeois) lifestyles of our times. kubrick worked on the screenplay for quite a long time and could finish shooting only months before his death. the inspiration was the novel traumnovella by arthur schnitzler who was a close friend of sigmund freud. the film is an attempt to question the notions of love, trust, and sexuality in order to unfold the taken-for-granted relations between these notions. it also reveals the role these notions play in constructing and reconstructing social bodies in a certain way. it tells the story of an upper-middle class new york couple (bill harford performed by tom cruise and alice harford performed by nicole kidman) who lose their way upon having a few existential crises in three consecutive days. the diverse routes alice and bill take to deal with their own traumas opens up the possibility to observe the conditions of different levels of (un)consciousness. alice, as opposed to bill, is neither attached in an unbounded way to the dream she was thrown into nor is she too heavily involved in the circumstances surrounding her way of life. bill, on the other hand, is capable of easily justifying the conditions of his life through his instrumental rationality; nevertheless, he easily falls apart within the first crisis. this review attempts to unfold the ways in which the characters try to overcome 1 dr. bora erdagi is a research assistant in the department of philosophy at kocaeli university, izmit, turkey. he can be reached at berdagi@gmail.com. eyes wide shut 146 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research these crises with respect to their class positions. in so doing, it also undertakes a broader search to speculate about the reified nature of current social relations. in other words, while the film reflects the psychoanalytic exploration of the characters, this review aims at a socio-political analysis of the characters. bill is a medical doctor working for upper-class people, and his wife alice works as an art director. in the opening scene we see them in an extremely fancy christmas ball where they find themselves separated and try to find each other for the rest of the evening. the next night, during a moment of drunkenness before having sex, alice and bill start talking about the previous night. alice suddenly starts asking bill questions about their relationship. bill has a hard time answering alice’s simple questions such as “why do you love me?” as he tries to get out of the situation he is trapped in, he is faced with a confession from alice. alice tells him that she cannot avoid thinking about another man. more strikingly, she confesses that she was once ready to leave everything behind for the man she was thinking about. this confession shatters bill’s preconceived beliefs about his marriage as well as his own being. he is thus forced to open his eyes. however, he is not totally woken yet since opening one’s eyes does not necessarily imply they have abandoned the dream. bill, nevertheless, is now left scared and vulnerable, far from the stability of his security zone. upon receiving a phone call from a patient’s family, bill leaves home. but this trip will turn into a nightmare as he is now entirely defenseless. this nightmare will go on until alice wakes him up. when he arrives at the patient’s house, he is informed that his patient has died. afterwards, the deceased patient’s daughter confesses her love for bill in the funeral room to which he does not respond and leaves the house. walking on the street he encounters a prostitute, chats with her for a bit and goes to her place, something he would not have done before. these experiences greatly complicate things for bill, especially after losing his footing on the takenfor-granted ground upon which he formally stood. the light of the real world now dazzles his eyes and yet he does not stop there. for him, the night turns into a search for a story through which he may obtain a counter-position to his wife’s story so that he can reconstruct his lost self-esteem and strengthen his ego. the audience is then brought to a pivotal moment in the story when bill meets a friend in a pub. his friend mentions a private sex party for upper class new yorkers. bill obtains the secret password from his friend and attends by infiltrating the party house with a rented mask and costume. however, bill’s identity is revealed and a prostitute sacrifices herself in an effort to rescue him. after having to leave the party, he gets back home and finds alice talking in her sleep. he wakes her up. alice tells bill that, in her dream, he and she were naked in a deserted place. she says that when he left her to find their clothes, she felt better. then, the man she 147 had been constantly thinking about appeared and they began having sex in front of a crowd. alice’s dream brings forth an absolute possibility for bill to be woken up from his own dream that is his reality. however, bill denies that possibility and retains his calm position. the next day, he returns the rented costume and witnesses the store owner selling his teenage daughter to others for sex. in light of these, and other shocking events in two consecutive nights, he realizes that he has to face his own reality. that same night bill, who finally has something of his own to confess, starts explaining to alice what he had experienced over the last three days. this, for both of them, may denote the end of the sleep, but still not the dream. their sleep ends and eyes are now wide open! with the first sunlight falling on the ground, the harford family is metamorphosed. while christmas shopping the next day, we hear a short dialogue between our “exhausted warriors”: bill: what do you think we should do? alice: what do i think? i don’t know. maybe i think (...) we should be grateful that we’ve managed to survive through all of our adventures (…) whether they were real or only a dream. bill: a dream is never just a dream. alice: the important thing is we’re awake now. alice’s open, questioning and repentant attitude throughout the film proves to be healing for their relationship. she helps, despite all the hardship, the lived experience arise to the level of consciousness rather than suppressing it. throughout the film, bill appears on the screen much more than alice does. alice however, appears only in critical moments, mimicking the relationship between the conscious and unconscious. bill, on the other hand, acts ‘rationally’ under almost all circumstances. but his rationality lacks content; it is completely instrumental, and he observes reality from a paradigmatically representational perspective. questioning is rarely a feature of his rationality. he fears falling apart as he experiences something new and shocking. however, falling apart in bill’s case does not spring from the ‘shock of experience’, which walter benjamin defines in his miscellaneous writings as a norm of nineteenth-century intellectuals. according to benjamin, shock disintegrates people’s emotional world, but it also restructures their intellectual world. in bill’s case, it is hard to observe this restructuring of his reason because he does not utilize the shocking experiences to transform his reality. it is more as if bill has had an accident and keeps chasing whatever has crashed into him rather than trying to understand what had happened. it is, therefore, obvious that bill is not a typical inheritor of the nineteenth-century shock experience. in this sense, he indeed behaves in the exact opposite way to which benjamin describes. bill represents the instrumental reason eyes wide shut 148 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research that theodor w. adorno radically criticizes. moreover, bill resembles a typical reconciliatory bourgeois of twentieth-century keynesianism who declares himself as participative in social and political life, while completely ignoring the ongoing class struggles and yet wanting his ‘heroism’ to be acknowledged by others. his dreams and fantasies about the world—and about his heroic position in it—replace his real life experiences, and therefore it is difficult for him to be woken from his dreams (his constructed reality). alice, on the other hand, positions herself at the complete opposite pole. she thinks that it is foolish to hide behind masks, especially after the masks are uncovered. thus, unlike bill, she chooses to deal with reality, not through fantasy but through language. in that, she also tries to emancipate language from its given constraints. emancipating language from its chains allows for slippages and enables consciousness to set itself free from tensions. this opens up room for spontaneity. her use of story-telling, her first story occurring while her and bill were smoking marijuana and the second after just waking up, represents this process. alice’s peaceful reconciliation with reality is therefore much easier than bill’s, which moves alice to an advantageous position over bill. however, it by no means puts her in a revolutionary position because alice in a sense occupies the position of the bourgeoisie in the totality of the capitalist system, as georg lukacs would put it. for lukacs, the bourgeoisie is aware of the reality of class struggles with respect to their position within the master-slave dialectic. however, for the sake of their very existence, ‘the master’ (the bourgeoisie) forces ‘the slave’ (the proletariat) to obey. what this contradictory mechanism of subordination generates for the bourgeoisie is twofold: the awareness of their dependence on the proletariat and possibility of manipulation. yet this awareness does not put the bourgeoisie in a revolutionary position, which would allow them to overcome this contradiction. broadly speaking, as long as the bourgeoisie can survive this contradiction, the system will continue to benefit them. in this context, alice, unlike bill, is well aware of her and bill’s own class position and behaves in the way this awareness requires. she knows that, as members of the upper-middle class, they are afforded the privilege of enjoying their life through the denial and manipulation of the shocking contradictions their material conditions may reinforce. it is this knowledge that makes her a healing agent in their relationship even during times of crisis. this knowledge provides her with the flexibility to easily adjust her reality to the changing circumstances and assume the different stances necessary in defense of both herself and her husband. the two portraits drawn above help us to unpack two different modes of politics. the first, represented by bill, depends entirely on traditional modalities; the functioning of which is dependent less on awareness than it is on repression techniques as a defense mechanism. as opposed to its rational outlook, it is never 149 reconciled with critical reasoning. this is a bourgeois politics. the second, represented by alice, relies on awareness as well as manipulation; it also emanates from a bourgeois politics. despite the differences, both modes of politics require masks to be performed. because, as it is illustrated above for both alice and bill, family replaces free sex in their relationship, reality replaces fantasy, recognition by others replaces conflict, the conservation of lifestyle replaces alteration and finally, dream/ masks replaces real life. then, it seems reasonable to claim the following: waking up is not as difficult as imagined. it is however, more difficult to awaken from a dream that is thought to be limited by the sleep itself. because dreaming is not something that consciousness can deal with easily, unpacking a dream is only possible through the denial of various masks. abandoning the masks however, requires a realistic revolutionary position acknowledging the real life experiences and material conditions of today’s world where dreaming is made tremendously charming through the fantasy, ideologies and ubiquitous reification that occupies almost every aspect of modern life. in the last scene of the film, both alice and bill obtain awareness of their bourgeois lifestyles. in other words, both characters finally wake up from their sleep. neither of them however, abandons their dreams because neither wants to lose their world of fetishized commodities. in this way, lukacs’s prophecy does not come true: totality is preserved for the sake of totality. eyes wide shut 150 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research whole book pdf 978-1-926958-01-9 171 book review in and out of crisis: the global financial meltdown and left alternatives, by greg albo, sam gindin and leo panitch. oakland, california: spectre pm press, 2010. $13.95 u.s., paper. isbn: 978-1-60486-212-6. pages: 1-140. reviewed by carlo fanelli1 in and out of crisis is a thought provoking, accessible and politically engaging contribution to debates on the origin, severity and historical significance of the so-called “great recession”. furthermore, as the subtitle the global financial meltdown and left alternatives suggests, albo and authors provide an unapologetically socialist analysis of what to do about it. albo, gindin and panitch remind the reader that the classical meaning of crisis is turning point, to which they ask: has the crisis marked a turning point in the balance of class power and the organization of the state? or can the political alliances and power structures that have dominated the last four decades be reconstituted in what so clearly has been a monumental crisis? for the authors, the short answer to the first question is no and, for the second, yes. this book departs from the tendency of writers (both from the left and right) to view the current responses to crisis as somehow marking a return to keynesianism, or in terms of states versus markets, finance versus industry. instead, rather than lay emphasis on the economic determinations of the crisis, the authors (p.10) seek to politicize and get at the social roots of the problem by moving beyond limited technical or policy solutions to capitalist crises by instead placing democratic and social rights at the centre of their analysis. as they state (p.122): “the interpretation in this book is quite distinct”. 1 carlo fanelli is a ph.d candidate in the department of sociology & anthropology with a concentration in political economy. he can be reached at cfanelli@connect.carleton.ca in and out of crisis: the global financial meltdown and left alternatives 172 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research fortunately, the authors have preemptively summarized the outline of the book (p.25): ‘chapter one explores whether or not we are currently witnessing the end of neoliberalism; chapter two engages in current debates regarding the nature of capitalist crises, and the relationship between the state, finance and production in a neoliberal era; chapter three traces the historical process through which, over a century punctuated by previous cries, the american state and finance developed in tandem, and came to play a new kind of imperial role at the centre of global capitalism; chapter four traces the development of the crisis that began in 2007 and explains the active role of the american state, both under bush and obama, in containing the crisis in ways that reproduced the structures of class inequality and power domestically and internationally; chapter five analyses how the relationship between industry and finance played itself out in the auto sector, bringing to the fore the full class dimensions of the crisis; chapter six reflects on the impasse of the north american labour movement and the implications for the north american left; and chapter seven tries to think creatively about alternatives, not least in terms of how advancing the case for democratic economic planning, including the nationalization of the banks and auto industry, must become integrated with demands for immediate reforms.’ if the reader does not have the time for chapters one through seven, chapter eight’s ten theses on the crisis succinctly summarizes the gist of their arguments. for the purpose of this review, however, i would like to provide a glimpse of what makes in and out of crisis’ analysis distinct. or, in other words, what are likely to be the major points of contention stemming from their investigation. first, contrary to authors that claim that the new deal was an attempt to impose greater ‘regulation’ or ‘controls’ upon capital, albo et al argue that following the great depression of the 1930s, private banking institutions had been nurtured back to health in the post-war decades and then unleashed in the explosion of global innovations that have defined the neoliberal era. and that, despite the meltdown, (p.17) “[t]he conditions that kept neoliberal policies in play for so long have not been exhausted or undone by the crisis.” second, taking aim at a broad spectrum of liberal, keynesian, minskian and orthodox marxist views that posit the end of the american imperium, a return to greater “regulation” or the stagnation tendencies of “mature” capitalist economies (such as robert brenner and the monthly review school for instance), albo and 173 authors argue that, if anything, the crisis has reconfirmed the world’s dependence on the american state and financial system as capital everywhere ran to the safe haven of the us treasury bond. as opposed to the end of american hegemony or the birth of a multi-polar world, the resolution of this international crisis has rested fundamentally on the actions of the us state in leading a more or less coordinated response, and in the process integrating the g20 members into the us’s informal empire in what has been an extraordinarily dynamic period of capitalism. third, albo, gindin and panitch provide a unique examination of the relationship between states and markets, industry and finance and, therein, the class relations that underpin them. rater than viewing ‘financialization’ as narrowly superstructural, parasitic or speculative, or as a result of the tendency for the rate of profit to fall, they situate finance-led neoliberalism in historical terms in the sense that financial volatility actually becomes a developmental feature of neoliberalism that reinforces, rather than undermines the central position of financial interests in capitalist power structures. in their view, neoliberalism is understood as a (p.28) “particular form of class rule and state power that intensifies competitive imperatives for both firms and workers, increases dependence on the market in daily life and reinforces the dominant hierarchies of the world market, with the us at its apex.” fourth, the authors claim (p.91) that a new historical project must be placed on the agenda. in order to do this, the left must come to the bitter realization that the forms of protest, means of organizing and daily practices of activism, most visible in the anti-globalization movements and world social forums, just aren’t working anymore. this means soberly reflecting on the impasse of the north american labour movement, in addition to the successful “disorganization” (on the part of capital) of old working class institutions (labour parties, cooperatives, benefit societies) that has been central to neoliberalism and which threatens to become a historic class defeat. throughout the book, albo et al raise the question as to whether or not the left can develop the confidence to think as big and radical as “they”—the ruling class—are doing in terms of both how workers see the future and what needs to be done to build the capacities to get there. “the way forward”, they argue (p.114) however, “is not to take one step first and another more radical step later, but to find ways of integrating both the immediate demands and the goal of systemic change into the building of new political capacities.” as they remind (p.128), ‘democracy is not just a form of government but a kind of society’, which unavoidably remains fractional and incomplete within capitalism. a few questions, however, may beg further unpacking. in light of the shifting composition of the working class and the role of women’s reproductive labour, how would the expansion of collective social services such as in health care and in and out of crisis: the global financial meltdown and left alternatives 174 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research education, for instance, impact women’s paid and unpaid life experiences given their position in the labour market as a whole and concentration in specific sectors? given the legacy of defeats and setbacks over the period of neoliberalism, how may unions—many trapped in erstwhile social-democratic parties and the constraints of formal union structures—find some basis of unity that could help shape collective struggles in working-class communities and connect the linkages between the employed and unemployed, and those denied a chance to work? what kinds of fresh organizational structures and emergent forms of activism throughout north america and abroad carry potential? on the whole, in and out of crisis is all but certain to have a broad appeal to researchers and academics, as well as students and lay persons alike. the era of neoliberalism—that is, capitalist militancy, is by no means over. in fact, it seems to be gaining new momentum the world over. albo, gindin and panitch, in their short but no less provocative book, do much to not only shed light on what led to the enduring socio-economic and political uncertainty, but provide a much needed analysis on what may need to be done in order to avoid such relapses in the future. whole book pdf the limits of keyncsianism: some theoretical observations john malcolmson the history of advanced capitalism is the history of a statebuttressed, state-controlled and state-regulated capitalism. for this reason, it is no longer possible to speak of vital areas and processes which fall outside of this near pervasive blanket of state intervention. when seen in context, the expansion of the state sector and of state interventionism in general form part of a larger dynamic at work in the advanced capitalist economies. the growth of the service and repair sectors, the proliferation of intermediary functions, the emergence of a complex networv of advertising and marketing, the establishment of a growing research sector, the extension of consumer credit all of these developments and others reflect the increasing technical socialization of the labour process as well as the increasing complexity of the sphere of commodity circulation. all in all, advanced capitalism faces growing difficulties in its attempts to realize value (mandel, 1978: 401-3). the expansion of the state sector has absorbed much of the growth in some of these areas. together with the emergence of state planning and of extensive state involvement in the socialization of private sector costs and risks, this overall expansion can be seen as an attempt, by the state, to assist capital in the transcendence of those barriers it finds in its path. in other words, the state attempts to secure the social existence of capital through the mobilization of counter-tendencies to capitalist crisis. thus, despite changes in the nature of capitalism and changes in the nature of state activity, the specific modes of intervention still reflect the attempt to meet certain form-specific needs associated with the maintenance of the capitalist order. generally speaking, there is an inherent trend under late capitalism for the state to incorporate an ever greater number of productive and reproductive sectors into the 'general conditions of production' which it finances (mandel, 1978: 484). the origins of the modern interventionist state can be traced back to the immediate postwar period. the immediate problem facing capital and the state was one of conversion to a peacetime economy. it had taken a world war to lift international capitalism out of a decade of stagnation and unemployment, during which the social and political cohesion of the capitalist order faced serious challenge. experiences gained in managing a wartime economy had demonstrated the potential inherent in state intervention, i.e. the ability of the state to virtually end unemployment and to set the economy back on the course of expansion and growth. clearly, the lessons derived from these experiences were not lost on capital and the state. the conversion to a peacetime economy could not involve a return to the disruptive boom-bust cycle of earlier times. a dismantling of the war machine 88 could not lead to the threat of a sudden contraction of business activity. the best that might be hoped for was some sort of balance between private sector activity and public sector intervention, a balance that could assure those conditions necessary for continued capital investment and economic growth. these considerations demonstrate that the growth of state interventionism is not something that can be observed and analysed apart from an analysis of the balance of forces in the class struggle. the state's conversion to a program of fiscal and monetary management (of which commitment to a policy of full employment is but one aspect) was itself a reflection of the need to deflect working class opposition away from any radical alternative. steps taken in the construction of the welfare state symbolize the effort by the state to integrate labour into a postwar 'settlement' or consensus, something essential for the maintenance of relative stability and class harmony and for the attainment of economic growth. certain aspects of the welfare state can even be seen as tactical victories for the working class and its organizations, as instances where the working class has been able to "impose its political will on the logic of capital within capitalist relations" (altvater, 1976: 3). all of these factors suggest that the actual character of state intervention is something largely dependent upon the nature of the class struggle and its outcome (i.e. 'the relative contingency of the political process'). keynesian economics represents an attempt to guide and theorize the practice of state fiscal and monetary intervention in the advanced capitalist economies. to keynes, the laissez-faire liberal image of the state (i.e. the best state is that which governs least) was hopelessly inadequate in the face of chronic economic stagnation and 89 massive unemployment. classical economy had erred in assuming that the capitalist market was an inherently self-correcting mechanism and that any prolonged imbalance between supply and demand, producing unemployment or idle capacity, was impossible. in the keynesian system, the central postulate was that market equilibrium was possible at any level of employment, the latter being dependent upon the volume of effective demand. full employment is, therefore, not something towards which an economy will naturally tend. it is, rather an "optimum relationship" to be produced only by either "accident or design" (keynes, 1965: 28). the unimpeded interaction of market forces is something just as likely to produce stagnation as prosperity, a colossal wastage of resources instead of their efficient employment. thus, the ostensible object of government policy was the attainment of full employment via a policy of selective state intervention. the short term manipulation of key economic variables by the state is what is termed economic 'finetuning*, a practice designed to level out the disruptive boom-bust cycle of capitalism and to attain a state of permanent 'quasi-boom' . in the keynesian system, a given rate of investment and a given 2 'propensity to consume' will together bring forth an actual volume of effective demand which, in turn, will determine a definite level of employment consistent with economic equilibrium. when effective demand, the sum of the demand for capital and consumption goods, is equal to a nation's total income (i.e. total savings = total investments), the economic system will operate at a full employment equilibrium. if effective demand falters, then savings will exceed investments, total income will drop and unemployment will result. in setting forth this model, keynes was explicitly ressurecting the "great puzzle of effective demand" which, with ricardo, had vanished from the realm of 90 orthodox economic theory to lead a subterranean existence in the underworlds of gesell, douglas and marx (keynes, 1965: 32). and in doing so, keynes was concentrating his attack upon say's law, the idea of a selfequilibrating market. the mere fact that savings and investments may be defined the same way (as the excess of income over consumption) does not necessarily mean that the two will always tend to coincide in actual practice (keynes, 1965: 63, 83-4). the factors which determine the former are distinct and separate from those influencing the latter. in the final analysis, the nature of the equilibrium will depend upon the level of aggregate effective demand. in a mature capitalist economy, keynes felt there were valid reasons for suspecting that the level of effective demand would be insufficient to produce equilibrium at full employment. increased income will augment consumption but not by so much as the initial increase in income. keynes, (1965: 27) attributed this to the psychological propensity to consume consequent upon the increase in material affluence. therefore to increase and justify increased employment, there must be an amount of current investment sufficient to absorb the excess of total output over what the community chooses to consume when employment is at the given level. for unless there is this amount of investment, the receipts of the entrepreneurs will be less than is required to induce them to offer the given amount of employment (keynes, 1965: 27). thus, the question of investment was central to the keynesian model. the health of a mature capitalist economy depends upon the maintenance of an appropriate level of capital investment. acceptance of this principle leads, in keynes' mind, to the same conclusion as before, namely, that employment can only increase pari passu with an 91 increase in investment; unless, indeed, there is a change in the propensity to consume (1965: 98). however, as with consumption, a mature capitalist economy tended to throw up barriers to the productive investment of capital which served to weaken the incentive to invest on the part of the individual capitalist (i.e. the saturation of investment outlets, the declining marginal efficiency of capital etc.). additional factors such as the prevailing 'business mood' and the cost of borrowing might induce an investment strike as capital exercises a 'liquidity preference'. all in all, these factors held out the distinct possibility of a secular tendency to stagnation as the incentive to private investment weakened. the object of state policy, given these factors, was to ensure the attainment of a full employment equilibrium through the use of fiscal and monetary devices designed to strengthen both the incentive to invest as well as the society's 'propensity to consume'. here, the overriding importance of investment was clear. as david horowit: states (1973: 92) , by stressing the pre-eminent significance of the investment decision, in determining the level of output and employment, and by illuminating the dependence of that decision on the expectation of investors, keynes provided the key to a theory of fiscal politics which would show that the pattern of government spending must fall predominantly within the channels coincident with business interest. keynes was enough of a realist to know that any state authority that failed to provide the necessary framework for business expansion would soon find the economy in the throes of a major depression. indeed, it was the duty of the state to ensure that investment and accumulation materialized, even despite what might be the temporary whims of capital. keynes writes: it is not the ownership of the instruments of production which it is important for the state 92 to assume. if the state is able to determine the aggregate amount of resources .devoted to augmenting the instruments and the basic rate of reward to those who own them, it will have accomplished all that is necessary. moreover, the necessary measures of socialization can be introduced gradually and without a break in the general traditions of society (1965: 378). the object is therefore one of saving capitalism and for this reason it is completely erroneous to view keynes as a socialist. in the words of maurice dobb, despite an inclination epater les bourgeois and to patronize heretics, he went no further than the position of an interventist liberal, alive to the needs of his time (1977: 220). in practical terms, keynesian fiscal and monetary policy aims at the stimulation of both investment and consumption. "for it is unlikely," keynes writes, that full employment can be maintained, whatever we may do about investment, with the existing propensity to consume. there is room, therefore, for both policies to operate together; to promote investment and, at the same time, to promote consumption... i should readily concede that the wisest course is to advance on both fronts at once (1965: 325). to this end, the state should attune its monetary policy (lower interest rates, a flexible money supply) and its fiscal policy (taxation, subsidization, welfare spending etc.) in the attempt to surmount the overall deficiencies in the level of effective demand. keynes* approach to the problems of capital accumulation, with its emphasis upon the key variable, effective demand, is indicative of a highly abstract and ahistorical conceptualization of the nature of production founded upon capital. in general, the aggregates and categories used by keynes posit the essence of capitalist production as production for use and consumption, and not as production for value . "capital", writes keynes, "is not a self-subsistent entity existing apart from 93 consumption" (keynes, 1965: 106). consumption must be seen as the object and purpose of all economic activity (mattick, 1974: 11). the implications of this approach are far reaching in a number of areas. to take a concrete example, the keynesian concept of 'national income' (i.e. consumption investment) establishes a separation between its two major components only to blur the distinction by evaluating the significance of these components primarily in terms of their impact upon the level of effective demand. shigeto tsuru (1968: 194) wtites, the result is the keynesian concept of national income which has only one dimension, that of being consumable sooner or later . the part which is consumed during a given period is called 'consumption 1 , and the remainder in whatever physical form it may be, is called 'investment'. tsuru goes on to demonstrate that a methodology based upon what is essentially crude aggregation cannot accurately gauge what he terms the 'productivity effect' of consumption and investment, or the actual significance of consumption expenditure and investment outlays vis-a-vis the accumulation of capital. paul mattick (1974: 116) develops a similar point in greater detail in his discussion of the role of the 'multiplier* within the keynesian system. given the existence of idle capacity and unemployed workers during a depression, state expenditures are seen as 'pump priming' devices that stimulate a resumption of private sector business activity. an initial expenditure in the area of public works or welfare assistance initiates a chain reaction of subsequent expenditures (the precise quantitative dimensions of which depend upon the society's marginal propensity to consume), thereby multiplying the cumulative impact of the initial outlay. given this process, state expenditure might well be seen as a panacea whose curative powers are sufficient to overcome the shortfall in effective demand. 94 however, as mattick points out, there are serious problems inherent in the multiplier concept, which, in the final analysis, are rooted in the nature of state intervention and state spending within a capitalist economy. firstly, the multiplier concept creates the illusion... that any given amount of additional income can multiply itself merely by travelling from one group to another. actually, of course, this is not so, just as a change in the velocity of money does not imply a change in its quantity or in the quantity of commodities in circulation (mattick, 1974: 158). he adds that it is only when money spent in consumption finds its way into productive investment that any real increase in income takes place. secondly, a problem emerges because the state is not a capitalist and must therefore finance its activities out of revenue in the form of taxes, or out of borrowing. whereas the private sector is involved in the direct creation of surplus value, direct state involvement in production is usually confined to a series of non-productive enclaves vital for the economy as a whole but unprofitable for private investment and exploitation. for this reason, almost all forms of state expenditure must be seen as forms of consumption of surplus value within the context of the capitalist system as a whole. even in the case of government contracts with the private sector, the costs associated with this kind of induced production as well as the profits that accrue to the private suppliers must be financed out of taxes on the private productive base or out of borrowings against the future profitability of that same base (mattick, 1974: 118). in either case the state appropriates a portion of the surplus value generated in the private sector and for this reason alone state finance must be labelled unproductive from the standpoint of the whole system (yaffe, 1973: 51). 95 the multiplier effect of state spending is therefore largely illusory, despite the fact that the stimulus of government spending may help arrest a downward trend in business activity. mattick (1974: 1s9) notes that as state spending may ease unemployment and increase production in the private sector, it may under special conditions, induce an acceleration of private investments. if this should be the case, it would increase total income by more than that brought forth by deficit-spending, but this 'multiplication' would be due directly to the additional profitable investments, not to the initial spending. in the case of deficit spending, the overall complex of capitalist valorization problems find their expression in the cumulative growth of the national debt. attempts to rationalize this indebtedness usually rest upon the claim that a rising national income will offset the problems associated with increased borrowing and debt servicing. it is, however, impossible to gauge the stimulative impact of deficit financing if comparisons are made on the basis of total national income. as mattick states, the growing national debt cannot be related to total national income, but only to that part of the total which has not been injected into the economy by the government. it is by counting an expense as an income that the illusion arises that the growing national debt is neutralized by a rising national income (1974: 162). the upshot of this analysis may be summed up as follows. state spending can only be viewed as a consumption of surplus value, or better, a redistributive appropriation and consumption of surplus value with an aim to establish and maintain certain, historically-specific 'general material conditions of production' in the era of advanced capitalism. this expenditure cannot be viewed simply as one vital input amidst a complex of socially-necessary tasks and functions which together constitute 96 the system of production based upon capital. a perspective like this tends to abstract the technical aspects of an advanced division of labour away from the social relations which constitute capitalist production as a valorization process, and, in doing so, it loses sight of the fact that only labour undertaken within the capital relation can be productive of surplus value. the result is an analysis which downplays the limits of state intervention, which, ultimately, stem from the fact that the state is not a capitalist and that the state must therefore appropriate and consume surplus value in the course of its interventions. given this understanding, state expenditure and state intervention can best be seen as "indirectly productive for capital in the sense used by marx" they constitute essential moments apart from capital which, nonetheless, make a vital contribution to the social conditions of capitalist reproduction (fine and harris, 1976: 104-5). the limits of contemporary state intervention inhere in the very nature of the form-specific functions the state is called upon to provide within the context of advanced capitalism. the use of fiscal and monetary devices to attenuate the business cycle and prevent the re-emergence of dangerously high levels of unemployment has served to displace the locus of contradiction and crisis to the level of the state itself. the cumulative growth of public debt, the mounting burden of debt servicing and the bias of permanent inflation together represent the price paid by 'capital in general 1 for the maintenance of state-buttressed 'prosperity' amidst conditions of declining profitability in vital sectors and growing difficulties in the sphere of commodity circulation. state intervention in the form of 'demand management' and an expanded money supply has served to arrest the necessary destruction of excess capitals in the economic crisis and to hinder the concentration and 97 re-organization of the capital structure necessary for a profitable upswing in business activity (itoh, 1978: 6-7). the use of credit leverage and deficit financing to further this end has led to the current phenomenon of 'stagflation', a steady and seemingly inexorable rise in the cost of living amidst either sluggish or non-existent growth rates. all in all, capital in crisis stands in need of a depression, a 'shake-out' that the state dare not risk in view of its likely social and political consequences. the current strategy of keynesian intervention, based as it is upon the use of fiscal and monetary means for the redistribution of existing values, cannot penetrate to the heart of the matter for, as fine and harris note, "the dominant recuperative force in crisis is the re-organization of capital and not the redistribution of values" (1976: 111). given this situation, the efficacy of the keynesian devices is severely limited by the expansion of state debt on one side, and the risk of refuelling inflation without any substantial improvement in business activity, on the other (itoh, 1978: 9). the growing obsolescence of keynesianism is reflected in the fact that the current high level of unemployment does not basically result from the needs of distributional struggle (although this plays a secondary related role), but from the need for a break in the circuit of capital to release money, means of production and labour-power so that they can, at a later stage of the cycle, when the expansion capital's circuit is renewed, be re-employed in a circuit based on a re-structuring of productive capital (fine and harris, 1976: 112). in the meantime, the crisis of a state-buttressed capitalism increasingly manifests itself in a crisis of state finance. the stage is thus set for a round of spending cuts, as the state attempts to 'rationalize' its spending and taxation priorities to suit the valorization needs of capital (o'connor, 1973). in the long run, the continued existence of 98 the welfare state, as it is currently known, is placed in serious jeopardy. the current crisis of capital, the fiscal crisis of the state and the growing impotence of keynesian economics all point in the final analysis to the dynamic, yet crisis-ridden course of capitalist development. state intervention, as the continuous and ongoing management of vital economic processes, emerged in a particular conjuncture in response to particular social and economic pressures. for a certain specified period, the efficacy of this intervention was clearly seen and hence unquestioned. yet, the crisis of the 1970' s demonstrates that a state-managed and state-regulated capitalism is still capitalism, still subject to the inner laws of motion that characterize capitalist production, and still subject to the barriers and limits that inhere in the form of capital itself. for this reason, the growing obsolescence of the keynesian prescription can best be seen as reflecting the transition of the capitalist mode of production to a higher phase of development which, in turn, will posit the form-specific functions of the state in a new and qualitatively different manner. whatever the change in state fort! and function, it must, nevertheless, remain consistent with the fom of capital itself and the immanent necessities posited by this form. all in all, the state must always face up to the need of securing the political and social domination of capital and, in doing so, secure the social exsitence of capital itself. conclusion : post-keynesianism? in a wall street journal story, dated september 6, 1974, the following statement is attributed to robert gordon, then president of the american economic association: under keynes' influence, we've developed a theory of aggregate demand but haven't even started to develop a theory of aggregate supply (quoted in morris, 1974: 3) 99 in its own way, an admission like this one reflects a growing feeling that keynesian economics, and modern economic theory in general, docs not provide adequate insight into basic problems regarding capital accumulation and production, problems made more acute with the current economic crisis. current state intervention and emerging future trends in this area also reflect this. given the predicament of 'stagflation 1 , the atmosphere is ripe for the state to undertake new departures in setting the economy back on track, departures that push state intervention beyond the ambit of traditional keynesian practice. massive cutbacks in health, education and social services, inroads into the collective bargaining process and controls on wage increases all mark the arrival of a new phase of state intervention. the precise nature and direction of this new phase is hard to determine as of yet, but it will likely involve efforts to redistribute income away from working-class consumption, to co-opt organized labour into surrendering gains made over decades of struggle and to mobilize state funds in the attempt to remove the structural barriers to sustained capital accumulation. an image of the future that lies in store for the western world might be drawn from an article in the october, 1974 issue of business week . in discussing the problems and imperatives facing american capitalism, the author reaches the following matter-of-fact conclusion : some people will obviously have to do with less... indeed, cities and states, the home mortgage market, small business and the consumer will all get less than they want because the basic health of the u.s. is based on the basic health of its corporations and banks: the biggest borrowers and the biggest lenders (quoted in sweezy and magdoff, 197s: 2). 100 notes there are basic problems involved in simply equating state intcrventionism with keynesianism. as has been stated, much of what came to constitute the keynesian prescription in practice dates back at least as far as world war i and, in addition, certain aspects of modern state practice cannot be traced back to keynes. in spite of this, keynesianism does represent a general theorization of state intervention in advanced capitalism. it is with this general connexion in mind that this paper is based upon the admittedly rather loose and simplistic identification of the two entities. keynes (1965: 8-10) defines 'propensity to consume' as the ensemble of subjective and objective factors that guide the consumption habits and the decision whether to spend or save of individuals and classes. ian gough (1975) argues that it is wrong to see state spending as non-productive for this reason. 101 rfffrf.ncf.s alvater, elmar 1976 "reproduction conditions of the capital relation and the bourgeois state" bulletin of the conference of socialist economists , 5, (1). dobb, maurice 1977 theories of value and distribution since adam smith . london: cambridge. fine, ben and laurence harris 1976 "'state expenditure in advanced capitalism: a critique" new left review, 98. gough, ian 1975 "state expenditures in advanced capitalism" new left review, 92. horowitz, david 1973 the fate of midas and other essays san francisco: ramparts. itoh, makato 1978 "the inflational crisis of world capitalism" capital and class, 4. keynes , john maynard 1965 the general theory of employment, interest and money . new york: harbinger. mandel, ernest 1978 late capitalism london: verso. mattick, paul 1974 marx and keynes • london: merlin. morris , jacob 1974 "stagflation" monthly review, 26, (7). o'connor, james 1973 the fiscal crisis of the statenew york: st. martins. 102 sweezy, paul and harry magdoff 1975 "the economic crisis in historical perspective, part ii" monthly review 26, (11). tsuru, shigeto 1968 "keynes versus marx: the methodology of aggregates" in david horowitz ed. , marx and modern economics new york: monthly review. yaffe, david 1973 "the crisis of profitability" new left review, 80. 103 | 223 an interview with pat armstrong canadian health care: privatization and gendered labour priscillia lefebvre is a collaborative ph .d . student at the department of sociology and anthropology/institute of political economy, carleton university (ottawa, canada) . pat armstrong is professor of sociology and women’s studies at york university (toronto, canada) . she held a chsrf/cihr chair in health services and nursing research, focused on gender and chaired the group women and health care reform for more than a decade . she has published on a wide range of issues related to gender, health care and work . pat was interviewed by priscillia lefebvre over august 2011 . priscillia lefebvre (pl): a large focus on your research seems to be the ways in which gender and labour intersect from the vantage point of health care delivery. what have been the main influences that have affected the trajectory of your research in terms of a feminist rooted political economy approach? why is this approach so important in understanding the contradictions that exist regarding the role of women within health care? pat armstrong (pa): it is difficult to identify the main influences on my thinking and research. growing up in a family where community involvement was not only encouraged but required meant seeking engagement at university. also, the red tory approach in our household did not fit so comfortably with the marx i read as a student in the 1960s or with the growing feminist movement i participated in. as juliet mitchell1 explained, marx was not good about women and did not provide a detailed blueprint for analysis, but he did offer a way to make systems transparent and to think about progressive change. in my reading of marx, work and the political economy are where the analysis should start because they are so powerful in shaping our lives; however, both productive and reproductive work have to be understood in historically specific ways and in ways that comprehend contradictions as well as interrelations. indeed, contradictions can provide a basis for creating alternatives. starting with power and economic forces did not imply ignoring ideas, discourses and cultural practices, but it did put those ideas, often blamed for an interview with pat armstrong canadian health care: privatization and gendered labour 224 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times women’s subordination, into a context that allowed us to see the power embedded in them and in their reproduction. furthermore, starting with the political economy did not mean ignoring gender and other basis for inequities. rather, as we are argued in the 1970s and 1980s, gender had to be theorized at the highest level of abstraction if we are to think through the implications for change in our lives. this relates, in turn, to another influence, which was involvement in student and other politics. my feminist political economy approach develops in such practices, as well as through engagement with other academics. canadian studies at carleton university in the early 1970s provided fertile ground for the further development of my ideas about political economy with a clearly canadian twist and so has my continuing policy work. as i became increasingly interested in feminist issues, i abandoned a thesis on the class origins of student activists and focused instead on women’s paid and unpaid work. the result was the double ghetto; canadian women and their segregated work,2 a joint project with my partner hugh armstrong, as is much of my research . when our daughter broke her leg and ended up in the hospital for weeks, we realized that health care covered all aspects of women’s work. paid and unpaid work overlapped in obvious and gendered ways, as the staff told me, but not hugh, where i could get our daughter juice and empty the bed pan. there were unionized and non-union workers, full, part-time and casual jobs, work defined as highly skilled and jobs defined as unskilled, occupations dominated by women classified as managerial, clerical, professional, and service, with many women from racialized and/ or immigrant groups. what it took us longer to realize but what we should have realized as political economists was that health care provides a unique context and required us to learn about a wider range of forces, policies and practices in care. women are not only the majority of workers, but also the majority of patients and of those who take others for care, creating complicated and often contradictory gender relations. equally important from our perspective, health care in canada offers a clear example of how universal programmes can create social solidarity by demonstrating the impact of collective action. what a political economy approach allows us to do is think through the ways work, gender and other inequities intersect, to explore the ways economic and political forces shape not only services and employment, but | 225 also ideas, and to bring together the complexity of work relations within this specific historical context. this approach also helps us see the contradictions in, for example, nurses fighting to distance themselves from links with women’s caring.3 pl: in a previous article published in a 1983 special edition of alternate routes1, you outline the problematic nature of quantitative data analysis as gender-blind. since then, you have been involved in several working groups, including the national coordinating group on health care reform and women (now women and health care reform), dedicated to researching health care reform policies and their impact on women both as health care providers and recipients. in your experience, what have been the greatest research challenges in gathering information on gender and sex differences within health care in canada? in your opinion, what needs to be explored further? pa: in my view, many of the challenges remain the same. there are still problems with the way data are collected and categorized, with the failure to collect some kinds of data and a further problem with the way the data are analyzed and with what gets accepted as good science. in too many cases, quantitative data are still seen as providing the truth and the whole truth, while qualitative data are too often treated as suspect. especially in health care, there is a hierarchy of evidence in terms of what kinds of data are accepted as legitimate and worthy of attention with the meta-analysis of double-blind randomized clinical trials taken as the gold standard because they are assumed to remove all bias. yet numbers, and categories, continue to reflect values. one example from our recent research is the definition of industry.4 in the past, statistics canada defined industry as ‘where people work.’ thus, everyone who worked in hospital would be counted as working in the health care industry. now industry is defined as ‘who you work for,’ removing from health care all those whose jobs have been contracted out, most of whom are women and many of whom are from racialized groups. a second example comes from data on work-related violence.5 our interviews with women employed in long-term residential care indicate that many women fail to report violence, in part because they will be blamed, in part because they won’t be believed, and in part because it takes too much time. the result is underestimates of violence in the numbers. 1  beyond numbers: problems with quantitative data, by pat armstrong and hugh armstrong in alternate routes: a critical review, vol. 6. ottawa, ontario: carleton university, 1983. pages: 1-40. an interview with pat armstrong canadian health care: privatization and gendered labour 226 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times at the same time, research is still published that failed to collect data by sex, and even more frequently, without analyzing the data by sex or gender. most frequently, the approach to data collection and analysis makes it impossible to do a gender analysis. women and health care reform has illustrated the problem by looking at wait times for hip and knee surgery, demonstrating that we need to look at the entire patient journey to see the ways gender influences how long women wait and even whether or not women get the surgery they need.6 a mere comparison of the number of women who get surgery compared to the number of men tells us little about equity. as women and health care reform struggled to figure out how to ensure gender could be included as a criterion in meta-analysis such as cochrane reviews, we came to realize that in their attempt to ensure scientific validity such reviews sought to eliminate context. as a result, they eliminated gender and racialization because both are about social relations in context. in addition, new problems have arisen since we wrote that article. at the time statistics canada data were free and now much of it must be paid for. in the past, we could analyze the data in the way we saw fit. now for access to much of the original data, you apply for access and then you have to go through a data analysis centre where the analysis must be vetted. of course, the government has attacked the long-form census in general and a critical question for feminist in particular, the one that asked about unpaid work. does gender have an impact, and in what ways, needs to always be part of the question, whatever the research, but this lesson has still not been learned by far too many researchers and policy makers. so, what needs to be explored further is a huge question. in short, we have some more data by sex, but too little analysis by gender and too much faith in numbers. pl: much of your work focuses on the privatization of health care and its detrimental effects in terms of access to treatment and quality of care. in exposing privatization2 (p. 163), you outline the introduction of privatization measures to health care beginning with the majority conservative government in ontario in the mid-90s. given the current tory majority at the federal level and provincial inroads to privatization in ontario, do you see this as a particularly critical time in defending health care as a public good, rather than a competitive market com2 bernier, kay wilson, karen r. grant, and ann pederson. toronto, ontario: university of toronto press, 2001. $24.76 cdn, paper. isbn-13: 978-1551930374. pages: 1-310. | 227 modity? what are your thoughts regarding stephen harper’s recent statement that, although the federal conservatives have no plans to go private, he cannot control the kinds of alternative delivery models used at the provincial level? pa: the best defence of public health care is popular support and we need to mobilize that support more than ever because we are facing a huge threat. the biggest threat now, in my view, is not costs but further privatization in all its forms. those pushing for privatization know that medicare is canada’s best loved social programme and so have privatized by stealth, always promising public payment. they have claimed there is a crisis and that health care cannot be sustained; that it must be radically transformed in order to save it. fear is a powerful force, especially when your health is at stake. our biggest problem in defending public care is complexity and the difficulty of getting people to understand why it is wrong to have forprofit delivery, even if the money comes from the public purse rather than from private payment, and why health care is as sustainable as we want it to be. i think the federal government will be very crafty while promoting deep privatization. it will negotiate individually with provinces and territories, allowing them to go their own way and blame the consequences on them. of course, the prime minister can stop that. monique begin did when she was minister of health and welfare. but prime minister harper will not intervene, so we need to put pressure at the local level and keep educating people about the perils of profits in care. if we do not stop this erosion soon, it will be too late. pl: in your opinion, how harmful are agreements such as the canadaeuropean union comprehensive economic and trade agreement (eu-ceta) to canadian health care and how are women affected in particular? pa: in many ways, these new agreements have much the same impact as earlier ones and have particularly negative consequences for women as a group and for particular groups of women.7 the agreements are written to promote profit and limit governments’ capacity to shape their own economies and public policies. it is much harder to influence policies if governments are prohibited from acting in the public’s interests and are instead forced to act in the interests of global profits. because more women than men depend on the state for services, financial support, jobs and protections against things like violence at work, agreements that limit or prevent governments from an interview with pat armstrong canadian health care: privatization and gendered labour 228 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times regulating, protecting, and providing have a particularly negative impact on them. the result is likely to be greater inequities among women, as well as greater inequity between women and men. pl: labour disputes, in particular organized labour, have received much political attention recently. for example, in an unprecedented move, postal workers were recently legislated back to work on a lockout. do you consider the recent use of back to work legislation in both the private and public sectors as threatening to the collective bargaining rights of unions? also, how do you think these latest negotiations will affect the collective organization and labour struggles of health service workers (for example, nurses and home care workers)? pa: the attacks on labour are no surprise and it should be clear that attacks on unions in the public sector are attacks on women who make up the majority of unionized workers there. one factor that kept families going during the most recent economic crisis was women’s employment in the public sector in general.8 we are building up to massive cuts in the health sector, where four out of five workers are women and where one in five women works. those who keep their jobs are likely to see them get worse as privatization is pushed further. cutbacks in public pensions and benefits will also hurt these women, as well as their families. at the same time however, women employed in health care enjoy tremendous public support. if the unions in the public sector can come together and resist, we may see real limits on attacks from the government. few doubt these women work hard, few think they are overpaid or pandered to by their employers, so it is much harder to sell the line about being pampered employees or to promote the politics of envy with them, as has been done with other unionized workers. pl: finally, in critical to care3 (p. 53), you argue that much of the labour performed by women in health services is essential in terms of providing care, yet remains peripheral in terms of social and economic status. your research indicates that due to this gendered division of labour in health care women are the primary health care providers in canada, yet women hold very little decision making power when it comes to policy. also, not only is it highly gendered, it is highly racialized. in your opinion, to what extent has the introduction of state level initiatives, such as the foreign live-in caregiver program, 3  critical to care: the invisible women in health services, by pat armstrong, hugh armstrong, and krista scott-dixon. toronto, ontario: university of toronto press, 2008. $20.76 cdn, paper. isbn-13: 978-0802096081. pages: 1-176. | 229 perpetuated these inequities? also, even if such initiatives did not exist, how far do you think ‘within system’ efforts, such as changes to policy, will go in resolving these inequities? is a shift beyond the present political system also needed? pa: these are complicated questions and difficult to answer in part because i think there are contradictory policies and practices. universal health care has undoubtedly helped women, both as care providers and as those with care needs. women’s employment conditions are better in the public sector and they have more power there, in large measure because unions have been strong, but also because there are pressures within and outside government to respond to calls for human rights and to set an example as a model employer.9 initiatives such as pay and employment equity have helped make employment in the public sector more equitable than in the private sector. of course, these gains are precisely why there is pressure on governments to abandon these policies and to attack unions; attacks supported by many within governments. this is not to claim that health care has been equally accessible or that employment practices in the public sector have resulted in equity but we can demonstrate that women do better in the public sector than they do in the for-profit one. at the same time, the way health care has been organized and policies developed have in many ways reinforced not only women’s responsibilities for care, but also the inequities among women. this is happening increasingly with current reforms. nor is it to argue that we should try to return to some ‘good old days.’ those days were not all good and, in any case, they are gone. we are dealing with a new reality and ‘old’ means of undermining the gains we made. nevertheless, i think that we should struggle for government policies that promote equity. universal public daycare combined with more public homecare, for example, could help make the foreign live-in caregiver programme irrelevant. if workers in these services were unionized and supported by strong anti-racist programmes, it would help address some inequities. however, it is not sufficient, in my view, to rely on governments alone. we need strategies that address conditions of work and care within the voluntary and for-profit sectors as well, even while we work for public care. we also need strategies to change the power inequities within households. i agree, then, with the implications of your question that we need to shift beyond the system and that we need to connect multiple policies in and outside the state, but i think that it is still important to work to change public policies. an interview with pat armstrong canadian health care: privatization and gendered labour 230 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times notes 1 women’s estate by juliet mitchell. harmondsworth: penguin, 1971 and “marxism and women’s liberation” by juliet mitchell. social praxis 1(1):23-33. 2 the double ghetto: canadian women and their segregated work by pat armstrong and hugh armstrong. toronto: mcclelland and stewart, 1978. 3 “contradictions at work: struggles for control in canadian health care” by pat armstrong and hugh armstrong in morbid symptoms health under capitalism, edited by leo panitch and colin leys. 2009. pontypool: merlin press, pages 145-183 4 “doubtful data: why paradigms matter in counting the health-care labor force” by pat armstrong, hugh armstrong and kate laxer in. work in tumultuous times: critical perspectives , edited byvivian shalla and wallace clement. montreal and kingston: mcgill-queen’s university press, 2007 “precarious work, privatization, and the health care industry: the case of ancillary workers” . pat armstrong and kate laxer in precarious employment . understanding labour market insecurity in canada edited by leah vosko. montreal: mcgillqueen’s university press, 2006. 5 critical to care: the invisible women in health services, by pat armstrong, hugh armstrong, and krista scott-dixon. toronto, ontario: university of toronto press, 2008. $20.76 cdn, paper. isbn-13: 978-0802096081. pages: 1-176. 6 “waiting to wait: improving wait times evidence through gender-based analysis by beth jackson, ann pederson and madeline boscoe in women’s health . intersections of policy, research, and practice. edited by pat arsmtrong and jennifer deadman. toronto: women’s press, 2009. pages 35-52. 7 “trade agreements, home care and women’s health.” by olena hankivsky, marina morrow, pat armstrong, lindsay, galvin and holly grinvalds. ottawa: status of women in canada, 2004. 8 “women forced to work longer, harder, for less pay by pat armstrong in speaking truth to power edited by trish hennessey and ed finn. ottawa: ccpa, 2010. pages 7-14. 9 precarious work, privatization, and the health care industry: the case of ancillary workers” . pat armstrong and kate laxer in precarious employment . understanding labour market insecurity in canada edited by leah vosko. montreal: mcgill-queen’s university press, 2006. twenty-first century socialism and the global financial meltdown | 171 twenty-first century socialism and the global financial meltdown: in conversation with michael lebowitz — rebekah wetmore and ryan romard rebekah wetmore and ryan romard1 (rw/rr): the crisis of world capitalism starting in 2007 was the most severe crisis of capitalism since the great depression and thus far the recovery, both globally and within canada, has been weak at best. with this mind, to what extent is the current crisis cyclical and in what ways is this related to a broader, systemic crisis of the capitalist system? michael lebowitz2 (ml): this is not a question for which there is a quick answer. what do we mean by a crisis of capitalism? i distinguish between a crisis in capitalism and a crisis of capitalism. for me, there is only a crisis of capitalism when there is an organized and conscious subject prepared to put an end to capitalism. there are always crises, though, within capitalism. understanding this distinguishes a marxian perspective from the perspective of mainstream neoclassical economists for whom the normal state of capitalism is equilibrium and crises are aberrations. for marx and marxists, crises are inherent in capital’s tendency toward overaccumulation. it is inherent in the nature of capital that its orientation is to grow, to expand — to accumulate, accumulate! in a crisis, though, that process of accumulation is checked. all crises take the form initially of the inability of capital to realise the 1 rebekah wetmore is an independent researcher and community organizer. she has an ma in sociology from acadia university in wolfville, nova scotia. ryan romard is a ma candidate in sociology at acadia university. he studies the sociology of agriculture in cuba. 2 michael a. lebowitz is professor emeritus of economics at simon fraser university in vancouver, canada, and the author of, most recently, the socialist alternative: real human development, and the contradictions of “real socialism”: the conductor and the conducted. he was the director of the program in transformative practice and human development, centro internacional miranda, in caracas, venezuela, from 2006-11. 172 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism surplus value extracted from workers through exploitation in the process of production. if capital is unable to realise the surplus value which is contained within commodities through sale of those commodities, it will cut back on their production. and, the result is unemployment as well as reduced demand for investment—in other words, reduced demand for the sector producing means of production. growing unemployment in both the consumer goods sector and the sector producing means of production means that there will be greater difficulties in selling commodities. thus, the initial emergence of the inability to sell commodities brings with it a deepening crisis within capitalism. part of that deepening of the crisis involves a significant reduction in the values of capital — in the value of raw material stocks, for example, but especially what is called fictitious capital. by fictitious capital, we mean the capital invested in various vehicles which, while linked ultimately to the fortunes of real capital within the spheres of production and circulation, takes on a life of its own. for example, the values of shares in corporations (which have their real basis in the profitability of those corporations) expand significantly in the period of a boom. presumably, these values are related to expectations of that profitability but those stock values are determined instead by prospects of money to be made in the stock market. until the moment of truth, there comes a point as a crisis within the real economy emerges in which there is an enormous destruction of those values contained in this particular form of fictitious capital— i.e., a crisis of the stock market. and this is not the only form of fictitious capital. we’ve seen a great destruction of fictitious capital in the form of various financial instruments such as derivatives, etc. as well as real estate values. all of this has its impact and feeds back on the real, underlying economy to deepen a crisis. none of this explains why crises occur, though—why capital’s drive to expand comes up against barriers. in marx’s capital, he indicated that capital develops an ability to grow by leaps and bounds and comes up against no barriers except those presented by the availability of raw materials and the extent of sales outlets. both those barriers are the result of capital’s tendency for overaccumulation. in the case of the first, marx described how overaccumulation tends to be manifested in lagging production of raw materials and other products whose source is nature. agriculture and extractive industries such as mining, marx noted, are modes of production sui generis — they cannot be expanded in the same way as spheres of production which are users of raw materials. precisely for this reason, then, in an extended period of accumulation, capital often twenty-first century socialism and the global financial meltdown | 173 comes up against the problem of the rising value of raw materials with the result that a greater proportion of capital outlays must be for what is called constant capital. these will be periods in which the rate of profit tends to fall because overaccumulation in industry has as its counterpart underaccumulation in the production of raw materials. you can see my discussion of marx’s argument in ‘the general and the specific in marx’s theory of crisis’, which is reprinted in my book, following marx: method, critique and crisis. the second barrier that marx identified is rooted in the antagonistic conditions within which capital functions — in other words, in the nature of capitalist relations of production themselves (recall that marx stressed that the real barrier of capital is capital itself). capital’s drive to increase the rate of exploitation brings with it a tendency for its ability to produce more and more articles of consumption to come up against a barrier in terms of its ability to realise the surplus value contained in those commodities; this tendency for overproduction of capital often takes the form of intensification of capitalist competition. the begged question, though, is if a rising rate of exploitation is significant, why doesn’t the relatively increased share of income for capital lead to increased capitalist expenditures (investment and consumption)? the answer is that capitalists are not likely to expand productive capacity if there is already unused capacity in the productive sector (because of overaccumulation) and falling profit rates because of the burden of the high costs of raw materials. the situation is one in which workers can’t spend and capitalists won’t. it’s a situation when capitalists choose to place their funds elsewhere—in securities, real estate, etc. i have been describing a crisis which is essentially a cyclical crisis. cyclical crises, though, by definition don’t last. for one, the process of destruction of values can restore the conditions for resumption of profitable production. but crises can be more than cyclical; they can also be structural. when we talk about the overaccumulation of capital, it is essential to recognise that capital does not expand in unison. there is an inherent tendency toward unevenness: some capitals will be the major contributors to the growth and accumulation of capital while others may bear the brunt of the effects of overaccumulation. in particular, there are periods in which capital expands in new areas, new geographical regions, more rapidly than in the old regions of capitalist expansion. this process may reflect new, advanced productive forces (thus, better means of securing relative surplus value) or very high rates of exploitation based upon low real wages and a high length and intensity of work—and sometimes it 174 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism may be both modern techniques and very low wages. this emergence of new capitals and new forms of production provides a basis for a structural crisis — in other words, a crisis which is the result of the changing structure of capital. although it does not occur with the periodicity of a cyclical crisis, this definitely has happened before—in what was called the great depression in england in the latter part of the 19th century (as the result of the growth of production in germany and elsewhere on the continent as well as the us) and in the 1930s (after the growth of mass production in the us and the growth of the rate of exploitation in the 20s). crises in capitalism which embody both cyclical elements but also significant structural elements will be deeper and longer than those which only involve cyclical swings. further, structural crises may generate significant tensions because the change in the geographical locus of capital resulting from unevenness may lead to an attempt to redivide spheres of influence and power (and thus inter-imperialist rivalry). finally, their resolution may require a process of restructuring of capitalist institutions in order to incorporate the new elements and manage these new relations—the obvious case being the restructuring which occurred with the bretton woods agreements after the depression of the 30s and world war ii. i have been stressing this question of restructuring because it is obvious that the current crisis within capitalism is both cyclical and also structural in this sense. there’s been a very significant growth in productive capacity, an accumulation of capital, in centres such as china, south korea, india, brazil, etc. a significant part of the explanation of this process has been the enormous reserve armies of labour in the countryside which could be drawn upon for the expansion of wage labour within industry at wage rates well below the levels in the old capitalist centres. as a result, this has been a period marked by a rising rate of exploitation on a world scale and at the same time a rising demand for raw materials from these new expanding centres of capitalist accumulation (reflected in prosperity in raw material producing centres). both these characteristics tend to generate a crisis within world capitalism; however, within that general crisis, the unevenness is obvious. in the old centres of capital, we see that rather than the expansion of productive capital, money has flowed into finance and real estate; thus, one can speak accurately about the separation of finance capital from productive capital there (much like england’s shift toward rentier capitalism in the late 19th century). but there is more: in the context of capitalist competition and pressures upon profits we see that capital in twenty-first century socialism and the global financial meltdown | 175 these old centres has managed to insulate itself somewhat because of its success in shifting the tax burden to the working class—reducing taxes upon corporations and upon those with high income (who are described as the ‘job creators’). capital has been able to do this because the defeat of the working class in these centres. to describe, though, the growth of finance capital at the expense of productive capital as characteristic of this crisis in capitalism (and especially to see this as a sign of the crisis of capitalism) is an example of onesidedness (which happens to coincide with the location of those who come to this conclusion). it doesn’t look at all like a crisis of capitalism in china, vietnam, india, brazil etc. in short, what we are seeing is a change in the structure of world capitalism, and the attempt to manage the change in that structure is reflected in such developments as the shift from the g7 to the g20. will that restructuring of capital succeed? i suggest that, in the absence of the ability of the working class throughout the world to prevent it, capital will succeed in this as it has in the past. let me turn, though, to a question which you didn’t ask explicitly: is there anything in this existing situation which points to the ultimate, final crisis of capitalism? although there are many marxist economists who are predicting the end of capitalism (something marxist economists are prone to do), my perspective is somewhat different. it is obvious that there is a very serious problem of an emerging ecological crisis to which capital is contributing substantially. however, that is a crisis of humanity—not a crisis of capital. how and if this crisis of humanity can be prevented depends upon a serious movement of working people to put an end to capitalism by all means possible and as soon as possible. and that will be the crisis of capitalism. rw/rr: canada’s prime minister stephan harper has unashamedly promoted the myth that the financial crisis did not greatly affect canada. is this notion of canadian exceptionalism warranted? if not, what might the next couple of years be like for canadians, particularly in light of the recent austerity measures? ml: it is true that canada has not been as affected by the financial crisis as the united states. but that has really little to do with the actions of the harper government. in part, it reflects the difference in the nature of the banking system and the traditions of finance in canada. in part, too, it also reflects the difference in the risk orientation of canadians. but this is not a case of canadian exceptionalism at all. not unless you forget about 176 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism all those other exceptions like chile, ecuador, venezuela, brazil, and indeed all countries exporting raw materials to china and experiencing a boom based upon this. there have been two distinct tendencies affecting the canadian economy. one is the tendency related to the depression in the united states, given canada’s long-term dependence upon that market. the other tendency reflects the resource boom based upon exports to china and other asian countries. those two tendencies reflect the changing structure of world capitalism, and the geographical division involved is reproduced within canada itself. thus, provinces like québec and ontario, which have focused upon manufacturing, are suffering significantly whereas prairie provinces like alberta, saskatchewan and manitoba in particular have been benefiting from their resources. the harper government has thrown its lot in with the latter group of provinces and with the emerging new centres of capital. in its so-called budget bill, its determination to push through pipelines to serve china, its interest in chinese foreign investment, its removal of environmental protection measures, etc, we can see that it is placing a wager on the structural changes in capital. this strategy has major implications for the canadian economy. thomas mulcair of the ndp has raised the question of the ‘dutch disease’ — i.e., the blow to canadian manufacturing as a result of a rising value of the canadian dollar linked to resource exports. i think that’s a bit premature because we cannot say at this point how much of this particular decline is cyclical and how much is structural. however, over a long time period, i think it is correct to talk about the spectre of the dutch disease. the harper government strategy points in the direction of a new model — actually a return to the old model, that of the hewers of wood and drawers of water (i.e., to a hollowing-out of the economy similar to what happened to venezuela over a number of years as the result of its oil wealth). in this period, the two tendencies interact. budget deficits reflect the fate of the old capitals—in particular, the problems in the u.s. economy and the pattern of tax cuts for corporations and high income earners that have occurred here. as in the case of the united states, the defeat of the working class and the weakness of working class institutions has meant the successful imposition of capital’s austerity plan which is an attack on the working class. to this can be added the effect of resource exports which have significantly elevated the value of the canadian dollar relative to that of the us and seriously affected manufacturing exports as well as those of sectors such as the forest industry (and thus employment in these sectors). twenty-first century socialism and the global financial meltdown | 177 of course, it is essential to recognise that these two tendencies are not occurring in two separate worlds. the rapid accumulation of capital in china and other emerging capitalist countries has itself been based on the existence of markets in the developed north. to the extent that the latter continue to slump, it can not help but affect the accumulation of capital in the former and thus their demand for resources. when that happens (and i think the only thing in question will be its extent), canada faces the real prospect of a serious decline. all other things equal, this will accelerate and intensify the capitalist austerity project. so, when you ask the question as to what may the next couple of years be like for canadians, it is difficult to provide a definite answer. it depends. all other things are not necessarily equal. if the working class continues to be defeated, we can look forward to one defeat after another—one attack after another on social services, health and safety, education, everything that people have made sacrifices and struggled to achieve in the past. it’s not, of course, inevitable. nothing is inevitable when it comes to the question of class struggle. rw/rr: in the socialist alternative, you argue that “given the heterogeneity of the collective worker (and its various forms of immiseration) and capital’s use of differences to divide the working class in order to defeat it, a political instrument is needed to mediate among the parts of the collective worker, provide the welcoming space where popular movements can learn from each other and develop the unity necessary to defeat capital..” is the anti-capitalist left in canada ready to form such a party? if not, what can be done to foster the development of this type of party? ml: my immediate response is no, the anti-capitalist left in canada is definitely not ready to form a party which can defeat capital. but there is also the question as to whether an anti-capitalist left as such can ever defeat capital. i doubt that. when i was involved in rebuilding the left in vancouver, i argued that we needed to go beyond organising on the basis of anti-capitalism and instead to stress explicitly the necessity for a socialist alternative. anti-capitalism means something different for everyone. for some people, it is opposition to big corporations; for others, it is opposition to the banks or the capitalist state or money or large-scale industry, international capital or inequality in income and wealth. accordingly, the perceived alternative can range from breaking up the corporations to developing alternative currencies to supporting cooperatives and credit unions to putting an end to private ownership 178 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism of the means of production and to returning simply to the good old days when people could anticipate a good job, a home of their own and all the amenities that their parents had. the multiplicity of views about what we don’t like about capitalism (ie., anti-capitalism) was apparent in the occupy movement. of course people should struggle against every assault by capital and every violation of our conceptions of justice. marx made the point well: without the struggles of workers over wages, workers would be a ‘heartbroken, a weak-minded, a worn-out, unresisting mass’ and would be incapable of any larger struggles. of course, too, it is essential to try to link these struggles. however, in the absence of a positive vision, capital can and will separate and defeat those who oppose it. trade unions under attack and facing capital’s demand for concessions, for example, can look at issues outside their immediate concerns and say, ‘what’s this got to do with our members?’ sometimes, though, capital and the capitalist state make it easier to connect issues. in 1983, a simultaneous blanket assault by the social credit government in bc created conditions in which it was possible to unify teachers, hospital workers, renters, poverty movements and private sector trade unions who were injured by the proposed legislation in a movement toward a general strike. similarly, when capital is in a crisis period and moves to administer its affairs through a general programme of capitalist austerity, it is possible to bring together those under attack—both those suffering from the crisis itself and those under attack by the capitalist state. that is what occupy, the enraged and the middle east spring demonstrate. and, right now that potential is there as the result of the harper government’s so-called budget bill. but, as the disintegration of the general strike movement in bc demonstrated, many ‘no’s’ do not make a big ‘yes’. at the present time, people are fighting against reductions in social services, against measures which make universities and education inaccessible for many, against the removal of measures protecting against the destruction of the environment, against the removal of support for our current healthcare system — against, indeed, many characteristics of what is viewed as our entitlement, an entitlement which didn’t drop from the sky but which was the result of years of struggle. in short, people are struggling out of a sense of fairness. but there’s a difference between struggling over questions of fairness (sometimes identified as characteristic of moral economy) and being able to understand why all this is occurring — enough so to be able to put an end to such attacks. if you don’t undertwenty-first century socialism and the global financial meltdown | 179 stand the underlying factors, you are likely to look upon what you’re fighting for as the restoration of the good old days. marx made this point in talking about the limits of wage struggles. 99% of those struggles, he said, were reactions against capital’s previous actions to drive down wages. they were attempts to restore the traditional standard of life and occurred under the conservative banner of a fair day’s pay for a fair day’s work. and, it was accurate to describe this as a conservative slogan because workers fighting under that banner were seeking to conserve or preserve the pre-existing conditions. while though those struggles were essential for developing their collective strength and dignity, marx stressed the necessity for workers to go beyond those guerrilla wars against capital and its state and to struggle under the revolutionary banner of putting an end to capitalist relations. we need to understand the nature of capitalism, and we need a vision of a socialist alternative if we are to defeat capital. this is my point in the socialist alternative: real human development, where i argue for a vision of socialism which involves social ownership of the means of production, worker and community decision-making and production for social needs rather than exchange. a focus upon human development unifies these elements and, indeed, has the potential to unify all our separate struggles. this vision of a society in which all human beings are able to develop their capacities and realize their potential is the vision contained in the communist manifesto—a society in which ‘the free development of each is the condition for the free development of all’. we need to communicate and struggle for the realization of that vision. defeating capital won’t happen spontaneously through some kind of collective epiphany. it requires conscious effort. but any attempt to create at this point a party to defeat capital would be viewed correctly as just another vanguard sect promising to deliver socialism. it is important to start from people’s conception of fairness and to understand why they are moved to struggle. however, we need to recognise the limits of guerrilla wars against capital and to learn to work together in practice to build an understanding about the nature of capitalism and the need for a socialist vision. that means finding ways to create spaces where popular movements can learn from each other—spaces and new forms like people’s assemblies at every level. we need but we’re not ready to form a socialist party that can defeat capital. but we can develop a socialist project, one which listens, educates and helps to create the basis for a new type of party which is integral to and does not stand over and above social movements. 180 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism rw/rr: drawing on your work in venezuela, cuba and the former soviet union what might a socialistic response to the ongoing economic crisis look like? what has been venezuela’s response to the economic crisis? what can socialists in canada and elsewhere learn from these experiences about how to respond to the crises of capitalism? ml: i’ve just completed a new book, contradictions of ‘real socialism’: the conductor and the conducted, which stressed, among other things, the importance of building upon aspects of the ‘moral economy’ of the working class in the former soviet union in order to move forward to socialism. as we know, however, what did happen was precisely the opposite—an attack on the concepts of fairness and justice of workers as part of the process of moving to capitalism. unfortunately, too, there are many signs in cuba that the response to their current crisis is to move in the same direction although it is still too soon to rule out the possibility that there can be a return to the ideas of che guevara about the importance of building socialist human beings. venezuela, though, does offer some ideas that canadians can draw upon—precisely because it is a capitalist country with resource wealth, has the experience of suffering the dutch disease and now has a government with the articulated goal of building a new socialism different from the experiences of the 20th century. in particular, the government of hugo chavez has decided to use its resource wealth to expand enormously access to health services and education, to reclaim as state property the oil and other basic industries as well as telecommunications, electricity, steel, cement, airlines and a host of other sectors seen as important for satisfying the many needs of venezuelans. by building up local industry, housing and agriculture with oil revenues, it is explicitly attempting to demonstrate that there is nothing inevitable about the dutch disease if you have a government committed to food sovereignty and to creating opportunities for jobs that can serve the needs of people. there are many problems in venezuela, and not the least is the inherited culture of clientalism and corruption (as well as a tendency to populism) to which the chavez government is not at all immune. but there are elements that can inspire many people within canada who don’t think of themselves as part of an anti-capitalist or socialist left. the idea of neighbourhood government where people can work together with their neighbours to solve local problems and to plan (something embodied in the communal councils and communes in venezuela) and the idea twenty-first century socialism and the global financial meltdown | 181 of workers councils (without which, chavez has said, you can’t build socialism)—these are ideas which don’t need oil revenues or major state-directed programmes. this concept of protagonistic democracy, a concept of democracy as practice through which people can develop their potential, can appeal to people precisely because of their sense of their powerlessness in modern capitalist society. are there ideas here for canadian socialists to draw upon in the context of the current crisis and the capitalist austerity programme under way? think about it. taking resource wealth away from private corporations to be used for fostering the education and health of the people and building new socially-owned industry, creating new institutions which allow for the development of the capacities of people through their own practices, i.e., developing the ultimate productive forces—wouldn’t these be elements with which to counter capital’s austerity programme and to substitute for it a socialist austerity programme (i.e., austerity for capital)? consider how different would be the situation in the current crisis in canada if resource revenues were poured back into the economy for education and health and for building and modernising economic activity—investments for the future as well as a means of mitigating (instead of exacerbating) the current crisis. capitalism, as chavez has said, is a perverse system—one which doesn’t care about human beings. we can use the opportunity of the current crisis to demonstrate how it is a system that we need to go beyond. 248 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times an interview with michael perelman the invisible handcuffs of capitalism: how market tyranny stifles the economy by stunting workers by michael perelman. new york, new york: monthly review press, 2011. $19.95 u.s., paper. isbn-13: 978-1-58367-229-7. pages: 1-360. carlo fanelli is a ph .d . candidate at the department of sociology & anthropology, carleton university, with interests in critical political economy, labour studies, canadian public policy, social movements, urban sociology and education . carlo serves as editor of alternate routes: a journal of critical social research, and recently co-edited capitalism & confrontation: critical perspectives . michael perelman teaches economics at california state university, chico . he has published 19 books, including, the confiscation of american prosperity, railroading economics, manufacturing discontent, the perverse economy, and the invention of capitalism. michael spoke to carlo fanelli about his most recent book over june 2011 . carlo fanelli (cf): your early work pays a great deal of attention to the classical political economists (e.g. ricardo, smith, j.b. say, j.s. mill, marx, etc.), with later writings engaging with economic luminaries such as alfred marshal and john maynard keynes. could you briefly discuss how this research has influenced your thinking about economics? and in what ways has this motivated your present explorations? michael perelman (mp): the disconnect between what purports to be objective analysis and the underlying power relationships fascinates me. like moliere’s bourgeois gentlemen, who was unaware that he was speaking prose, economists have developed a culture in which they communicate without any recognition of how much they have internalized the distorted perspective of a capitalist system. what is more surprising is how thoroughly the economists were able to propagate their flawed worldview throughout much of society. the economic worldview loses sight of essential elements of the world economists to analyze. once their simplistic world of economics spins out control, economists’ instinct is to explain away their deficiencies rather than finally coming to grips with the real world. in that sense, | 249 an interview with michael perelman the invisible handcuffs of capitalism: i feel that a critical study of economists and their economics becomes useful as a means of self-defense against the tyranny of markets. cf: a central theme running throughout much of your work has been to denaturalize capitalism–that is, as one of your previous book titles indicates, show how capitalism was “invented” and is not, as is commonly assumed, the natural culmination of age-old historical practices. rather your studies show how, as marx put it, capitalism was ‘written in the annals of mankind in letters of blood and fire.’ in this book you critique adam smith’s notion of fair, harmonious and efficient markets, and instead, argue that wage-labour depended on violence and coercion to accept the discipline of the workplace. how does this compare with previous forms of social organization? could you illustrate this with some examples? mp: to be fair, capitalism was not invented in some eureka moment. already in pre-historical times, people traded, but, of course, trade is a necessary, but not sufficient condition for capitalism. early on, people began to take up trades, moving the world closer to a capitalist economy. next, people would face hard times or need money for weddings or funerals. unable to pay their debts, they might find themselves forced into wage labor. however, wage labor at this stage of development represented a relatively small portion of the population. a mixture of wage labor and slavery existed in greece and rome, hence the word proletariat. once the great empires fell, feudal lords acquired far more power. serfdom increased at the expense wage labor. eventually, as modern technology took hold, power shifted again in the direction of traders, often under the shadow of the newly emerging european empires. the landed gentry either lost power or joined in the commercial revolution, which morphed into the industrial revolution. at this point, forcing people to work to make commodities for foreign trade became a high priority. marx described this process as primitive accumulation, where he wrote about the blood and fire. i followed up his work in my book, the invention of capitalism, where i described some of the harsh measures used to drive people off the land, where they could provide for their own needs, leaving them with the necessity of having to work for wages. the laws against hunting were particularly interesting. the legend of robin hood represented the feudal measures to protect the aristocrats’ hunting preserves. by the early 17th century, these laws had fallen into disuse. at the end of the century, as the shoots of modern capitalism were being 250 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times laid down, the law was suddenly enforced again. hunting became a capital offense. during the next century, australia became populated with by leaders of these game laws. at the same time, clumps of aristocratic hunters were allowed to ride across farmers’ land, in order to chase down foxes. in their published books, the political economists at the time ignored the injustices associated with the enforcement of the feudal game laws, as well as the enormous economic damage done by the hunters. instead, they described the economy as the result of voluntary transactions between willing buyers and sellers. away from the public eye, these same economists applauded the displacement of rural masses, which was providing new bodies for the emerging proletariat. in this sense, capitalism was invented as i described in the invention of capitalism. capitalism was invented in another sense. the early economists described the emergence of capitalism as a voluntary system that benefited everybody. this falsification of history, which was central to their analysis, was a very creative invention. cf: your most recent book, as you state (p.9), takes aim at capitalism in terms of its own basic rationale: the creation of an efficient method of organizing production. you argue that the failure by economists and employers alike to adequately take work, workers and working conditions into account has led to actions that have stifled the economy. this inattention, however, has not been accidental. can you describe the consequences of this largely ignored dimension of market inefficiency? mp: good question. in the invisible handcuffs, i tried to show how economists tried to frame capitalism as a system of voluntary transactions, as i mentioned in my previous answer. one can understand how the economists could have gotten away with this evasion of reality in a world when literacy was limited and communications, expensive. in a modern world, to be able to get away with such nonsense is an audacious act of genius. economic theory also abstracts from virtually anything having to do with time. for example, business is assumed to invest efficiently when it purchases durable equipment. how is that possible when business has no knowledge about future demand conditions, technology, or competition? considerations of such matters would make mathematical models impossible. how is it possible to efficiently value the existing stock of resource, such as petroleum, when nobody knows precisely how much petroleum | 251 there is, or whether alternative sources of energy will appear, or whether creating even more carbon dioxide would be too dangerous to contemplate? what economics does do very well is to create an effective ideological system that pretends to prove that whatever business wants to do is good. within this framework of voluntary transactions, workers agree to a wage bargain in which they give up their leisure time in return for wages, which more than compensate for their lost leisure. no thought is given to the context in which the transaction is made. from this perspective, the conditions of workers who accept the lethal consequences of accepting a job at the fukushima nuclear plant are no different a high priced athlete playing an enjoyable game. also missing from this picture is anything having to do with work, workers, and working conditions. the only relevant action is the wage bargain. just as an individual consumer tries to buy commodities at the cheapest possible price, employers want to buy their workers for as little as they can. unions become framed as a monopoly that interferes with the transactions. at the same time, this transaction-based perspective, neither employers nor society have any reason to nurture the skills or the creativity of the working class. why not break the unions and defund education. not surprisingly, productivity suffers. traumatized workers, as alan greenspan called them, may often be docile, but their fear of job loss is likely to interfere with efficient performance. but since all that counts is buying work at the cheapest possible price, even though the ultimate effect of that arrangement is detrimental to productivity, as well as society at large. in the book, i do describe the hostile treatment meted out to economists who stray from this perspective. in part, this attitude reflects the defensive behavior of academics who want to defend the purity of their supposed science, but, i suspect, that there may also be an intuition that to move beyond the transaction perspective ultimately leads to marx. part of what is involved is the unproductive effort used to maintain of power relations. once a worker is reduced to a means of production and managers can believe that they are selected because of their superior abilities. this perspective is obviously detrimental to workers’ creativity. in one of my favorite cases, when computerization was first being introduced into manufacturing, a paper mill opened up its computer system to the whole workforce. the workers who manned the facan interview with michael perelman the invisible handcuffs of capitalism: 252 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times tory took advantage of this access to information and quickly ramped up productivity and efficiency. recognizing the growing threat to their authority, management quickly shut off their access. imagine a team sport–basketball or soccer–in which no one could do anything without prior authorization from their coach. any deviations would be punished. not only would the players’ restriction hurt their play, but the players’ development would also suffer. cf: you make the case in the invention of capitalism (p. 10) that economics is an ideology masquerading as a science buttressed by mathematical models. scientific pretentions aside, the economics profession in your view supports the interests of the rich and powerful at the expense of the vast majority of the working class. contra mainstream economics, you show how the interests of employers and employees are fundamentally at odds. instead, you contend that what might be called “invisible handcuffs” blind workers from realizing how capitalism both constrains their potential and degrades their quality of life. can you briefly describe what you mean by this? in what ways has the economics profession, particularly their role in academe, played in reinforcing capitalism? how do neoclassical presuppositions, such as natural assumptions concerning human behavior, differ from your own starting points? mp: let me take issue with your premise. you suggest that economics supports the (perceived) interest of the rich. i inserted the parenthesis to suggest that economists are not doing the rich a real favor. i am convinced that a more egalitarian society would improve the general quality of life, not just of the working class. by all measures, the quality of life increases with equality. ignoring that point, in the united states the economics profession, fearing to suggest anything that will upset the rich and powerful, has practiced severe self-censorship for more than a century. other countries are not as extreme in this respect, but diversity is relatively rare in the study of economics around the world. a leftist– let alone a marxist–can hope to get a job in literary criticism or even sociology, but the chances in an economics department is less than slim. there are a few liberal arts college, some jesuit institutions, and a handful of state universities that are less rigid, but nonetheless relatively few of them. there was a brief opening in the 60s, but that has long passed. besides, the rigor (mortis?) of economists’ training is extremely demanding in terms of mastering mathematics and statistics. even if a student is already advanced enough | 253 to breeze through that work, he or she will have to find a sympathetic professor to oversee anything outside of the mainstream. if that effort is successful, the vast majority of departments would not consider that person as a potential colleague. i am fascinated by human potential—what unlikely people are able to accomplish despite the odds. i believe that everybody has the capacity to be the worlds best at something; that the role of society (not just family, or education) should be to help people discover what that something is. to the extent that this kind of discovery becomes widespread, societies will prosper. hierarchical systems prevent that kind of discovery and need to be eliminated as soon as possible. cf: you argue (p.29) that the promise of job creation drives the rhetoric of almost all economic policies. how has this influenced policymakers and what have been the consequences? what role have large corporations played? and how have changes in the organization of work, workers and working conditions affected the quality of employment? mp: the rhetoric of job creation smacks of blackmail. give us everything you want or we will make unemployment worse. but if you look at the last decade, business got virtually everything it requested, but without much job creation. what is worse, the largest corporations were most effective in reducing jobs. besides, real hourly wages peaked back in 1973. the corporations run around from state to state, offering to create new jobs in return for tax breaks and other incentives. sometimes the jobs never materialize; other times they do, but disappear soon after. cf: with the focus on workplace (especially union) concessions and attacks against the public provision of social services a current flashpoint of political contestation, how does economics serve to obscure relations of class and the compulsions of the market? mp: abstract economics does not play much of a role, either in the discussion of job creation or in the concessions and cutbacks that are rolling across the country. the basic justification is that business, by its very nature, will create all of the preconditions for prosperity as long as nothing impedes “the magic of the marketplace.” adults should not believe in magic. as long as opportunities exist to cut back on wages and benefits by moving work abroad to where people work for pennies an hour, expectation of a tsunami of good, highpaying jobs is ridiculous–even more so when companies get tax breaks to take advantage of such labor arbitrage. an interview with michael perelman the invisible handcuffs of capitalism: 254 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times cf: finally, where do we go from here? how may economists and the economic profession, within and external to academe, be challenged in progressive ways? what role does political education and mobilization play? how might academics, activists and trade unionists begin to break the chains of the “invisible handcuffs” ? mp: now you are getting to the toughest question. even marx never described the specifics of his ideal society. although he frequently recommended tactics to address particular situations, he never laid out a long-term strategy. in a sense, he had no choice. he was trying to assemble disparate political factions who could never agree on anything. some of his german followers then adopted the attitude that they should just wait for the crisis to open the door to a new society. now, after more than a century, that quietist strategy should be thoroughly discredited. the first step is the easiest. develop the thoroughgoing critique of the status quo. unfortunately, radicals have been quicker to snipe at each other’s analysis than to collaborate on something to appeal to the larger population. in short, the easiest part is still difficult. next, we must be able to communicate an alternative. merely to suggest the abstract idea of socialism is vulnerable to the charge of proposing to duplicate all the abuses, real or imagined, of any society that purports to be socialist. now, in the midst of a sadistic round of austerity, proposing an alternative should be easier than ever, but i haven’t seen much progress in that regard. the next step becomes even more difficult. people need to be able to organize in a way that not only appeals to the masses, but it makes them feel empowered. although i have not offered any concrete program, i think it might be useful in considering any action to think about how it might contribute to, or detract from the simple steps that i suggested. 115 free transit and social movement infrastructure: assessing the political potential of toronto’s nascent free transit campaign rebecca schein abstract: this article examines the movement-building potential of a campaign for free and accessible public transit in the city of toronto. the campaign, launched by the newly formed “greater toronto workers’ assembly,” calls for the de-commodification of toronto’s transit system, arguing that mass transportation is a public good that should be paid for by fair taxation. the demand for free transit represents a positive, concrete anti-capitalist vision for the future of the city, which could open a space for a broader public dialogue about public goods and public control over resource allocation. the process of developing and organizing a free transit campaign will present a productive set of challenges to the newly formed assembly, pushing it to develop the relationships, skills, and internal processes necessary for nurturing a broad-based anti-capitalist movement. keywords: g20; transit; public sector; social movements; “right to the city” the demonstrations surrounding the g20 summit in toronto unfolded more or less as scripted. the state spent obscene amounts of public money to install security cameras in toronto’s streets, build an enormous fence, and augment the capacities of the local, provincial, and national police forces, both logistically and legally. demonstrators marched peacefully along a designated route through deserted downtown streets. a few people broke windows and set fire to abandoned police cars. police made full use of their brand new riot gear and special legal powers. steve paiken of tvo was shocked, shocked, to see police aggression directed at journalists and, as he put it, “middle class people” peacefully assembling. a thousand arrests. the keynesian revival: a marxian critique 116 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research denunciations of police lawlessness and brutality. calls for a public inquiry. denunciations of vandalism. calls for solidarity. and of course, the perennial lament that the voices and messages of labour and civil society were lost in the clamor. to say the events were scripted is not to say that the violence and rights violations were not serious, or that people’s anger, shock, and frustration are not real, righteous, and deeply felt. the problem with this script is that our side loses. we get bogged down in the postmortem, denouncing each other, and then denouncing the denouncers. we pour scarce resources of time and money into mobilizing for legal defense: we are literally put on the defensive. we react with renewed outrage to the predictable “over-reaction” of the state and continue to mourn the movements we should be working to build. the aftermath of the g20 summit will be an important test for a newly formed activist organization called the greater toronto workers assembly (www.workersassembly.ca). formally convened in january 2010, the assembly is comprised of individual members from a diverse array of unions, leftist political groups, and grassroots community organizations1. the assembly’s organizational culture is still very much a work in progress, and it has not yet proven its capacity to sustain over the long haul the diligent, principled non-sectarianism that it has begun to cultivate over the past year. but coming out of the g20 summit, the analysis and political ambitions that have driven the assembly’s formation seem all the more urgent and necessary. the impetus behind the assembly, as i see it, is the idea that “changing the script” will require a new form of organization, one deliberately geared to gain traction against the contours of contemporary capitalism. at a time when unions have largely stopped acting like organs of a labour movement, and when workers increasingly identify their own fate with the fate of capital (and not without reason, given the financialization of many pensions), we need an organization capable of confronting the specific ways in which neoliberalism divides, demobilizes, and demoralizes its potential opponents. since joining the workers assembly, i have often been asked about the use of the word “worker” in the organization’s name. my answer has been that the work of the assembly is to rebuild the meaning of “working class.” that meaning will not be realized by fiat, and no organizational vision statement, however comprehensive or inclusive, will generate the cultural meanings that give shape and power to political identities. to rebuild the meaning and political potency of working class identities, we need an organization that will foster sustained relationships and sustained political dialogue—not as a precursor to movement-building, but as an intrinsic feature of the movement itself. 1 for a list of members’ organizational affiliations see http://www.workersassembly.ca/links 117 in the weeks since the g20 summit, i have had many conversations debating the need for various organizations to weigh in on the question of property destruction, “diversity of tactics,” and the meaning of solidarity in the face of state repression. although i was dismayed that broken windows played their part in the g20 drama, it was hard for me to feel that a movement had been discredited, or that the messages of “legitimate protestors” had been undermined. in the absence of a movement with clear ambitions, an ostensibly tactical debate quickly becomes unmoored from strategy and devolves into a discussion of principles—principles of non-violence, solidarity, opposition to police violence, etc. as long as we are neither harnessed by the practicalities of building a mass movement nor oriented towards a vision we really believe we can win, these debates are unlikely to generate productive disagreement and dialogue on the broader left. the greater toronto workers’ assembly, however, has embarked on a project that has real potential to develop into the kind of movement in which impassioned debates over tactics will be inspiring and energizing, rather than defeatist and moralizing. at its general meeting in april, 2010, the assembly voted to dedicate significant energy to a campaign for free, fully accessible public transit in the city of toronto. many of our members have been inspired by recent efforts to elaborate the “right to the city” as a rubric organizing demands for public services and city infrastructure (harvey, 2008; world charter on the right to the city, 2004). in toronto, recent fare-hikes, strikes, provincial funding cuts, cancelled or delayed construction projects, insufficient service, piecemeal and inadequate accessibility infrastructure, and public relations debacles have made our transit system the target of considerable public anger, much of which has been channeled into generalized anti-union resentment and calls for privatization. the assembly began to see a role for itself here—not only to respond to rhetoric pitting transit riders and transit workers against each other, but to popularize an analysis of public goods and an argument for democratic control over city resources. mass transit is an essential pillar of toronto’s public infrastructure, yet its transit system is among the least “public” public systems in the world. estimated at between 70 and 80 percent, toronto’s “fare-box recovery ratio”—the percentage of the system’s operating budget paid for by individual riders at the fare-box—is among the highest in the north america and more than doubles that of some other large cities around the world (toronto environmental alliance, 2009; toronto board of trade, 2010). many other transit systems in comparable cities “recoup” less than half of their operating budgets from fares, relying more heavily on subsidies from multiple levels of government. according to the toronto board of trade (2010), “essentially no north american or european transit systems operate in [the] manner [of toronto]” with respect to transit funding. the keynesian revival: a marxian critique 118 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research riders rarely think about rising “fare-box recovery ratios,” but few have failed to notice that fares have increased from $1.10 in 1991 to $3.00 in 2010—the last fare-hike in january 2010 arriving in the context of high unemployment and rising demand for emergency food and shelter services in the city. the fare-box recovery ratio represents a rough quantification of the efficiency with which neoliberal governments have divested from the public sphere and downloaded costs to the most vulnerable individuals. the failure to invest seriously in mass transit in recent decades has meant, moreover, that many toronto residents outside the downtown core pay high fares for service that is inconvenient and inefficient. while the operating subsidies that support other transit systems reflect an understanding of mass transit as a public good, yielding benefits to entire communities and ecosystems, toronto’s system increasingly treats transit as a commodity, consumed and paid for by individual riders. the funding structure of toronto’s transit system is effectively a form of regressive taxation: although all of toronto’s residents benefit from transit infrastructure—including the car-owners who never ride a bus—our “public” system is funded disproportionately out of the pockets of the lowand middle-income people who rely on mass transportation in their daily lives. the demand for free and accessible public transit has the potential not only to develop into a broad-based movement, but also to drive the development of the new kind of organization that the assembly aspires to become. the assembly is committed to its call for the outright abolition of transit fares, not merely a fare-freeze or fare-reduction. what is exciting to me about the free transit campaign is that the expression of a radical anti-capitalist principle—the outright de-commodification of public goods and services—actually serves in this instance to invite rather than foreclose genuine political dialogue about values, tactics, and strategies. while still in its early stages, the free transit campaign is already pushing us to elaborate both analytical and strategic links between commodification, environmental justice, the limits and capacities of public sector unions, and the interlocking forms of exclusion faced by people marginalized by poverty, racism, immigration status, or disability. free transit could represent a site of convergence between many distinct activist circles in the city and foster greater integration and collaboration between environmental advocacy, anti-poverty work, and diverse human rights organizations. if the free transit campaign does succeed in bringing diverse and distinct activist cultures into conversation with each other, it will force the assembly to grapple with strategic questions about its relationship to less radical organizations in the city. given the marginalization and isolation that have long plagued leftist groups in toronto and elsewhere, this should be a welcome challenge, particularly if the assembly hopes to become an effective left pole in a broad alliance. 119 among the strengths of the free transit campaign is the concreteness of vision. within the left, efforts to elaborate a broad anti-capitalist vision too often run aground at the level of abstractions, generalities, and platitudes. most toronto residents would draw a blank if asked to “imagine a world without capitalism,” but what torontonian who has ever waited for a bus can’t begin to imagine an alternate future for the city, built on the backbone of a fully public mass transit system? the invitation to imagine free transit is an invitation for transit riders to imagine themselves not simply as consumers of a commodity, but as members of a public entitled to participate in conversations about the kind of city they want to live in. without devolving into abstract and alienating debates over the meaning of, say, socialism, the call for free transit invokes the things we value: vibrant neighbourhoods; clean air and water; participatory politics; equitable distribution of resources; public space where we are free to speak, gather, play, create, and organize. even the most skeptical response to the idea of free transit—“how will you fund it?”—is the opening of a productive conversation about taxation and control over public resources. the call for free transit can effectively open a space for an unscripted political dialogue about the meaning of fair taxation, public goods, collective priorities, and public accountability for resource allocation. but perhaps more fundamentally, the free transit campaign is a rare example of a political project on the left that is not reactive, defensive, nostalgic, or alarmist, but hopeful, proactive, and forward-looking. “crisis talk” is pervasive in much of contemporary culture, but in left circles, it has become difficult to imagine a mode of organizing that is not oriented around predicting or responding to punctuated calamities of various kinds—whether a financial meltdown, an un/natural disaster, the latest wave of layoffs and service cuts, or the systematic violation of basic civil liberties on a weekend in downtown toronto. in the case of free transit, however, we are free to move ahead with the campaign on our own timeline, to seek out and develop the kinds of relationships and democratic spaces that are necessary to sustain grassroots movements over the long term. for the assembly, this will mean having the space and time to realistically assess its own capacities and to organically develop its own strategies and priorities. the assembly does not have modest ambitions: it hopes to nurture a broadbased anti-capitalist movement and to vitalize a new working class politics (rosenfeld & fanelli, 2010; dealy, 2010). its members are, i think, tired of listening to militant rhetoric unanchored to any genuine hope of winning. the push for an excellent, fully public and accessible transit system is a radical demand with immense popular appeal, an ambitious, long-range goal for which clear, achievable interim political victories are possible along the way. free transit is not a crazy idea. arguments in favour of free transit have surfaced sporadically in toronto over the the keynesian revival: a marxian critique 120 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research years, whether in an editorial by caw economist jim stanford in the globe and mail or in a cbc interview with deborah cowen, a professor of geography at the university of toronto (stanford, 2005; cowen, 2010). some cities already have free transit systems, and many have partially free systems—in the downtown core, during holiday seasons or off-peak hours, or on “spare the air” days when smog levels are high. but in toronto there has not yet been an initiative focused on building a broad-based movement dedicated to the eventual abolition of transit fares in the name of social, economic, and environmental justice. without abandoning or compromising its radicalism, the assembly can push for concrete steps in the direction of de-commodified transit and build productive relationships with individuals and organizations who do not necessarily identify themselves as anti-capitalist. it will be in the process of pushing for interim reforms along the way to a de-commodified transit system that the assembly will most need to articulate its political principles and its analysis of the spatialization of race and class in toronto. free transit in the downtown core may, for instance, be good for toronto’s tourism industry, but will it benefit the immigrant and working class communities in transit-poor areas of the inner suburbs, who spend proportionately more of their income to access poorer quality services than those available downtown? proposals to pay for free transit through suburban road tolls will similarly hit hardest those working class communities whose neighbourhoods are so underserved by transit that they have no choice but to drive into the city for work. the process of developing interim priorities will not, in other words, postpone the challenge of articulating and popularizing a class-based and anti-racist argument for public infrastructure. instead, the assembly will be forced to pursue its most radical aspirations by cultivating a sustained dialogue about the interim remedies and strategies that will both address real needs in our communities and help build a broad-based movement over the long term. it will be through this process of dialogue, i hope, that a new articulation of a politicized working class identity might emerge. our earliest discussions of the free transit campaign are already pushing us to think about the social complexities that will need to be navigated if we are to build an effective free transit movement. success will depend on our capacity to carve out and sustain a space for dialogue and negotiation among transit workers and riders, within unions, and across neighbourhoods and communities that have been unevenly affected by fare hikes and inadequate services. questions of tactics and strategy cannot be divorced from the process of identifying, developing, and strengthening the complex connections between the people who need and use public goods and services and the workers who provide them. we will need to recognize the different ways in which our various constituencies are powerful and vulnerable and learn how to defend and 121 protect each other. the free transit campaign lends itself to the kind of intensely local organizing through which honest dialogue, trust, and long-term relationships can be developed and nurtured—within and across neighbourhoods and among transit riders and workers. and of course, without these things, the campaign will go nowhere. among the strengths of the free transit campaign is its potential to foreground and develop an analysis of our collective stake in the protection of public goods. it is not difficult to talk about public goods in the context of mass transportation infrastructure. the shared benefits of public transportation are difficult to deny, particularly in a city as large and as sprawling as toronto. even setting aside the obvious ecological imperatives that should be driving public investment in greener infrastructure, there are powerful economic reasons to support a massive re-investment in ontario’s transportation sector. a serious effort to expand the reach and accessibility of the public transit system would serve not only to ease the burden of toronto’s most vulnerable residents and reduce the economic and health costs associated with air pollution and traffic congestion: such an investment could re-direct the wasted skills and resources embodied in ontario’s laid-off auto-workers and silent auto-plants, which could be converted to the production of high efficiency mass transit vehicles. as sam gindin and leo panitch (2010) argued recently in the toronto star, public borrowing to finance such investments represents not a wasteful burden on future generations, but a commitment to securing them a future. the real squandering of our collective resources lies not in public borrowing or benefits packages for public employees, but in our failure to direct existing skills, knowledge, and material capacities into a coherent strategy for building sustainable communities. the idea of a free transit movement immediately foregrounds a number of thorny strategic questions for the left in toronto: how to build trust, dialogue, and support for a free transit movement within the transit union; how to address and re-focus the widespread anger, mistrust, and resentment directed at the public sector in the current climate; how to sustain and advance anti-capitalist principles while building productive relationships within broader progressive milieux. navigating these questions will be challenging, and the assembly is still a long way from a coherent and systematic approach to answering them. but the fact that these questions surface so quickly and urgently is a positive sign of the ambition and seriousness with which the assembly is approaching the organization of a free transit movement. the free transit campaign will push the assembly to develop further its internal organizational and decision-making capacities, but it will also demand an outward-looking, inclusive process, in which the assembly’s role is to open space for debate, dialogue, and collective strategizing. the keynesian revival: a marxian critique 122 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research in fact, the transit system itself can provide the venue for us to stage public discussions about our collective resources and to share alternative visions for our city: the transit system is a readymade classroom, theatre, and art gallery, attended every day by people who could come to recognize their stake in the de-commodification of public goods of many kinds. my hope is that toronto’s buses, streetcars, and subway platforms could be places for experimentation, places to develop the new tactics, organizing skills, and relationships that might permit us to really depart from the prevailing script. references dealy w. (2010). the greater toronto workers’ assembly: building a space of solidarity, resistance, change. relay, 30, 27-28. gindin s, and l. panitch. public sector austerity unreasonable and irrational. toronto star. retrieved on august 25, 2010 from, http://www.thestar.com/opinion/editorialopinion/ article/837616--public-sector-austerity-unreasonable-and-irrational. greater toronto workers assembly. retrieved on september 9, 2010 from, www.workersassembly.ca harvey d. (2008). the right to the city. new left review. 53, 23-40. rosenfeld h, and c. fanelli. (2010). a new type of political organization? the greater toronto workers assembly. mr zine: a project of the monthly review foundation. retrieved on august 23, 2010 from, http://mrzine.monthlyreview.org/2010/rf050810.html. stanford j. (2005). free public transit on the dirty brown horizon? the globe and mail. retrieved on august 12, 2010 from, http://freepublictransit.org/jim_stanford.php. toronto board of trade. (2010). the move ahead: funding ‘the big move’. retrieved on september 12, 2010from, http://www.bot.com/am/template.cfm?section=growing_the_ economy&template=/cm/contentdisplay.cfm&contentid=4702. toronto environmental alliance. (2009). transit commission briefing note ttc operating budget 2010: fare increase. retrieved on september 8, 2010 from, http://www.torontoenvironment. org/campaigns/transit/fareincrease2010. transit funding challenges for toronto’s communities -interview with deb cowen. metro morning. canada: canadian broadcasting corporation march 29, 2010: runtime 8:03; http:// www.cbc.ca/metromorning/2010/03/transit-funding-challenges-for-torontos-communitiesruns-803.html world charter on the right to the city. (2004). social forum of the americas, quito, ecuador. retrieved on september 12, 2010 from, http://v1.dpi.org/lang-en/events/details.php?page=124. alternate routes a critical review editorial board: marybelle myers, daniel sansfacon, erika van meurs the previous editors jim conley and joan st. laurent were involved in selecting papers for this issue. distribution and promotion: joseph cooper, brian mokee illustrations: alwin and erika van meurs a iternate routes is an annual publication of graduate students in sociology and anthropology . manuscripts , subscriptions and communications should be addressed to: alternate routes department of sociology and anthropology carleton university ottawa, ontario, canada k1s sb6 the editioral board wishes to establish a genuine forum for the exchange of ideas. we welcome critical responses , commentaries or rejoinders , which we will endeavour to publish in subsequent issues. the editors gratefully acknowledge the financial assistance of the carleton university community : the department of sociology and anthropology and its chairperson, gordon irving; the dean of social sciences, dennis forcese; the graduate students ' association and the sociology and anthropology graduate students' caucus. ue also wish to thank bev cruikshank for : iministrative assistance . subscriptions : individuals and institutions: $3.50. make cheques payable to alternate routes. copyright 1982, alternate routes, unless otherwise noted. prin:nada. alternate routes vol 5 1982 editorial la revue alternate routes est publide par les etudiants gradues du departement de soaiologie et d'anthropologie de i'universite carleton. la revue se veut une alternative offerte aux etudiants desireux de developper une connaissance critique et de partiaiper aux debats actuels dans la societe canadienne . reconnaissant les contradictions inherentes a cette societe aussi bien qu'aux sciences sociales, nous rejetons d' emblee les divisions traditionnelles du savoir. notre objectif est done de contribuer au developpement d'une pensee originale qui ne s'enferme plus dans les orthodoxies du pouvoir mais ouvre sur une vision radicale de la societe canadienne. nous invitons done les etudiants que concernent ces questions a nous soumettre leurs articles . dans ce volume, les deux premiers articles 8 ' adressent au probleme des petits producteurs independants . christensen analyse la crise de la production fruitiere dans la vallee de i'okanagan en colombie-britannique; myers, de son cqte, etudie le dsveloppement des cooperatives d'etat chez les inuit suite a i 'extinction du marche de la fourrure . dans le premier article publii en francais dans la revue, sansfacon explore quelques-uns des problemes relies a une lecture marxiste du droit, en analysant une decision juridique . s 'attardant aussi aux luttes en colombie-britannique , edelson relate les tendances dans les relations de travail au niveau des gouvernement8 locaux et soutient qu'une alliance entre les travailleurs des services publics et les consommateurs de ces services est essentielle au syndicalisme dans ce secteur . enfin, robinson s 'insere dans le debet marxiste sur la division entre travail manuel et travail intellectuel pour defendre i'argument que les colleges communautaires idgitiment les relations politiques de domination dans le procea de travail. soulignons enfin, que dans la veine de notre editorial, le prochain volume de la revue sera consacre aux articles touchant les questions feminines . editorial statement a iternate routes is a journal published by the graduate students in the department of sociology and anthropology at carleton university . the journal offers an alternative to students attempting to develop critical knowledge and to participate in continuing debates in canadian society. acknowledging the inherent contradictions in this society, as well as in the social sciences , we reject the traditional division of knowledge . it is our purpose to contribute to the development of thought which is critical of conventional science and open to a radical vision of canadian society and we invite papers from graduate students concerned with these issues . in the current issue, two contributions deal with independent commodity production. christensen addresses the crisis in fruit farming in the okanagan valley in british columbia and myers looks at the rise of state-sponsored co-operatives among the inuit after the collapse of the fur trade. in the first french paper published by a iternate routes , sans f 'aeon explores some of the problems related to a marxist reading of law by way of a concrete analysis of a juridical decision. yet another paper dealing with struggles in british columbia comes from edelson who looks at trends in management-labour relations in local government and argues .for an alliance between civic workers and consumers of their services . finally, robinson enters the marxist debate on the division between manual and mental labour to argue that community colleges legitimize political relations in the labour process. in line with our emphasis on provocative analysis of contemporary issues, our next volume will be devoted to papers on women. biographical sketches erling christensen obtained his b.a. (sociology and political science) from simon fraser university and his m.a. (sociology ) from carleton university . he worked as a research coordinator with the canadian farmworkers' union. he is presently finishing a dissertation on the political economy of agriculture at simon fraser university . miriam edelson completed her b.a. hon. (political science) at mcmaster (1980). she is currently studying for an m.a. in political science at carleton university . she is president of cupe 2222, carleton'8 student assistants' union. the paper presented here is based on ongoing research on public sector unionization. marybelle myers obtained her b.a. (eng lit) in 1962 from trinity college, university of toronto. she taught in the northwest territories for two years, from 1965 to 1967 and was manager of project development for arctic quebec co-operatives from 1970 to 1980. her m.a. (sociology ) was obtained at mcgill university in 1978 and she is now a doctoral candidate at carleton university . david robinson obtained his b.a. hon. (sociology ) from st. francis xavier university in 1980. he is currently writing his m.a. thesis in sociology , on community colleges , at carleton university . daniel sansfaeon received his b.a. (psychology ) and m.a. (criminology ) from ottawa university in 1976 and 1981 respectively . he is presently a graduate student in the doctoral program in sociology at carleton university . his "tain research interests focus on the sociology of law and on the organization of social control . a critical review vol. 5, 1982 contents erling v. christensen aspects of the crisis in petit commodity production in the okanagan valley 1 marybelle myers beyond the fur trade: the rise and fall of the eskimo co-operative 27 daniel sansfacon sujet de droit et sujets de droit: de la pratique juridique au pluriel 67 miriam edelson accountable to whom? trends in managementlabour relations in local government 95 david robinson community colleges and the division between mental and manual labour 133 fiasfjusou jb. itz-ite (x6lst&q&j /d.l-zs aspects of the crisis in petit commodity production in the okanagan valley erling v. christensen petit commodity production in agriculture has been undergoing changes since 1945, with the general trend being towards increased capitalization of production. co-operative organization of production and distribution has enabled producers in the okanagan valley to resist, to a certain extent, the encroachment of capital. a crisis exists, nonetheless , in petit commodity production due to a pending breakdown of the co-operative structure as well as rising land prices due to speculation. les changements intervenus dans la petite production agriculturale depuis 1945 ddnotent une tendance croissante vers la capitalisation de la production. l' organisation cooperative de la production et de la distribution a permis aux producteurs de la vallee de i 'okanagan de resister, jusqu'a un certain point, a cet envahissement du capital. toutefois , en raison de sdrieuses difficultes dans la structure cooperative et des hausses du prix des terres dues a la speculation, la petite production indspendante traverse prisentement un etat de arise. alternate routes vol. 5 1982 2 introduction petit commodity production has, historically, been the basis of agricultural production in canada. although this basis has been transformed into larger capitalist units in some spheres of agricultural production, it has persisted in others. consequently, much debate has developed in recent years over the concept of petit commodity production and its role in canadian agriculture. in this paper, i focus on petit commodity production as a specific form of production. my argument is that, in the okanagan valley of british columbia, this form of tree fruit production persists, not as an isolated instance that exists in spite of a changing capitalist economy, but rather as a part of it. its persistence is due, in part, to the collective action of independent producers and their complementary roles in the larger capitalist economy. however, as independent producers in a capitalist economy they cannot escape the imminence of class struggle. it is, in fact, the contradictions inherent in their participation in the dominant capitalist economy that are responsible both for their persistence as independent producers and the severe crisis in their ability to continue as such. these contradictions are both external and internal. the internal contradictions become manifest, in part, by a crisis in collective responses to stave off transformation. the external contradictions become manifest, in part, by the pressures on agricultural land by state and capital. the most important structural element of independent commodity production in the tree fruit industry in the okanagan 3 valley has been the co-operative structure known as the british columbia fruit growers association (bcfga) . this co-operative structure developed as an attempt to protect and rationalize an industry dominated by independent producers. it has enabled producers to band together and to put some logic into both production and marketing. the bcfga has, however, been unable to control marketing. it has to compete with imports for the same market and, consequently, some producers have split from the organization and gone completely independent or have set up competing corporate structures. this split in the protective umbrella of the co-operative structure has created a crisis in both production and marketing in the industry as a whole. another important factor has been the limited land available in the okanagan, a narrow valley, affected by favourable climatic conditions not existing elsewhere in the province. some land has become available with increased technological advances in irrigation and fertilizing, but, as a whole, suitable land for tree fruit production remains limited. since land is at a premium for the agricultural industry, as well as the recreation industry , reproduction and/or transformation of petit commodity producers is contingent upon the availability and price of land. in turn, these factors affect the returns of agricultural production. there have been attempts to keep the price of agricultural land at artificially lower prices by putting a freeze on non-agricultural development, in spite of land protection, however, speculation and rising prices are reappearing, due to the pressure of recreational alternate routes vol. 5 1982 development as well as to. the inconsistency of the social credit government in removing certain parcels of land from the agricultural land reserves. these important aspects of independent commodity production -co-operative structure and land availability and price -have undergone some critical changes which have created a crisis in both the industry and in the viability of petit commodity producers to reproduce themselves as an economic unit. as i argue, this crisis will accelerate the contradictory forces affecting independent commodity producers in a capitalist dominated mode of production. the outcome of this accelerated class struggle is dealt with at the end of this paper. petit commodity production agricultural production in british columbia is generally organized into small independent production units, relying primarily upon family, as opposed to wage labour, a crucial distinction in the production of commodities (marx, 1967b: 548). in family production units there is virtually no distinction between capital and labour. the producer owns the means of production and is directly engaged in labour as one aspect of the relations of production. consequently, petit commodity production has been seen as constituting an independent mode of production. the conditions of petit commodity producers are, however, such that one cannot talk of an independent mode of production existing within a dominant capitalist mode of production (marx, 1967a:713). the merging of labour and capital is generally thought of as a transitory stage of development from feudalism to capitlaism, not expected to persevere in any significant form under the onslaught of capitalist development within an increasingly dominant capitalist mode of production (marx, 1967a : 7 13-716; 1971:810,812-813). herein lies the crux of the problem: why has petit commodity production persisted in agriculture for over a hundred years of capital development? or, to put it differently, why has agricultural production not been fully "rationalized" within the capitalist mode of production? there have been a number of recent attempts to develop a theoretical explanation of the persistence of independent commodity production and its varying rates of transformation. for, while it is true that it has per sisted, especial] y in agricultural production, it has also been changed and, even, transformed, in certain areas and spheres of production. petit commodity production persists, changes and transforms, 'then, in reaction to pressures and changes in the dominant capitalist mode of production. it has been argued by some that petit commodity production in agriculture, or "the family farm" is an apparition, or fossilized left-over from a previous time, and as such, must be understood in isolation (hedley, 1976:414). others argue that it is inevitable that small independent holdings will become part of a large corporate or capitalist structure (burbach and flynn,1980; hedley ,1976a) . such analyses, however, have found it difficult to explain the persistence of petit commodity production. they have been even less successful at explaining the small holding's contribution to and role in the larger economy. some have even argued that alternate routes vol. 5 1982 scale is of primary importance and that "... large farm units are necessary to allow efficient production of agricultural commodities" (flynn and buttel, 1980:949). agricultural organization in japan, denmark and france, as well as certain sectors in canadian agriculture, however, serves to refute that argument. one of the more insightful attempts to analyze the role of petit commodity production in agriculture is that of susan mann and james dickinson, who argue that the persistence of petit commodity production is due to "... an excess of production time over labour time..., labour recruitment problems, a lower rate of profit, and complications in the smooth realization of value in the sphere of circulation (1978:478)." this appears to be the first clear attempt to provide answers to why such forms persist. mann and dicikinson argue that it is the nature of agricultural production which creates the obstacles for capitalist development. in agriculture, much time is devoted to "natural processes" of growth before labour time is expended to produce value. during the intervals between planting and harvesting, for example, neither value nor surplus value is created (1978:472). they make a strong argument, separating "unproductive" ("of value) production time from "productive" (of value) production time. in computing value, they take into account labour invested in activities such as fertilizing and pruning, which create increases in production, hence, in value, but they eliminate activities such as tractor maintenance and shed building, which they consider to be nonvalue producing labour. such labour may be necessary to 7 production but it does not "create" value. the authors go on to link the possibilities of agricultural production with the problems of circulation, agreeing with marx that, although the circulation sphere produces no value, it is necessary in order that surplus value may be realized. the speed of circulation, for instance is important to capital; for, the quicker the turn-over, the quicker capital is required to renew the process. in canada, however, this process is determined, to a large extent, by climate which necessitates quick start-up of a new production cycle. nonetheless, circulation time is still of utmost importance, especially in the sphere of fresh fruit production. certain agricultural commodities, such as fresh fruits and vegetables, do not store well and require a quick turn-over in order to realize the full potential surplus value. purchasers of such commodities are not likely to buy at prices reflecting the cost and profit if the commodity is in the process of spoiling. while other agricultural commodities have benefitted by increased technology in cold storage facilities and transportation systems, fresh products still pose a firm or "absolute" limit for the circuit of commodity capital (mann and dickinson, 1987:475; marx, 1967b:131). as a consequence, capital has been slow to move into the production sector in most spheres of agricultural production. this limitation does not, of course, affect food grown for processing and in that sector there is already substantial involvement of capital. another attempt to analyze the persistence of petit commodity forms of production in agriculture has been undertaken alternate routes vol. s 1982 by carol maclennon and richard walker, who argue that the number of "family-owned and operated" farms has been declining and that the rural class structure is undergoing dramatic changes (1980:22). their contention is that a new "agrarian bourgeoisie with roots in the traditional family farms" will emerge from this crisis to create "a polarized structure, dominated by a small but powerful agrarian bourgeoisie" f 1980: 20) . the reason they give for the lack of corporate or "agribusiness" development is, however, superficial. they simply state that industrial corporations do not want to be bothered with direct agricultural production. big capital... has found it more advantageous in certain crops to contract with small farmers for their products rather than to invest directly in production (1980:3). they offer no explanation as to why this is so but, if their argement is put into the context established by mann and dickinson, there is, i believe, the possibility of further theoretical development. the major focus of the argument made by maclennon and walker is the changing rural class structure. illustration 1 is an attempt to graphically expand their argument, the crux of which is that family farm production is doomed to become a capitalist unit of production with a number of these farmers/owners being proletarianized into a combination of owner/of f -farm labourers. as we shall see later, however, family farm production has options which will delay this transformation, if not stop it altogether in certain spheres such as fresh fruit production. maclennon and walker argue further that increased labour productivity with increased debt to meet the cost price squeeze (where the costs of production, including heavy finance charges to banks and other lending agencies, greatly outdistance returns to the producer) will generate an increased reliance on wage labour at which point the "farm is pushed to become a capitalist unit of production" (1980:36). the difference between the development of a new "agrarian bourgeoisie" and the integration of agribusiness into industrial capital is not exlained sufficiently. illustration 1 the changing rural class structure (proletarianization of farm classes) family owner operators combination owner/wage earner in town sion small medium farmer edged out family farm production maintained through increases in family labour productivity + an attempt to solve the debt-income squeeze by combining increased debt with exploitation of a low wage labour force growth of agribusiness + increased mechanization as a way of increasing profits \r vertical integration with processors, distributors and retailers to maximize surplus value . v horizontal integration 4at this point the family farm is pushed to become a capitalist unit of agricultural production again, this argument could be made more attractive if combined with the argument made by mann and dickinson. this would help to clarify the dynamics of production which encourages expansion and integreation in certain spheres of production and alternate routes vol. 5 1982 10 consolidation and change, which maintains smaller "independent" units in other spheres. at any rate, both argue that capital integration is not inevitable (at least into the industrial sectors) for reasons which lie in the peculiarities of agricultural production which puts obstacles in the way of capital's need and development. while it is true that petit commodity production has persisted, it is also true that it. is in a state of constant turmoil. petit commodity producers are pressured and hemmed in in every direction. capital has developed control of production at both the input and the output side of agricultural production. the input level is dominated by capital in the areas of seed and fertilizer production, pesticides, farm machinery, etc. the output level is dominated in such areas as processing, wholesaling and retailing, as well as in the provision of transportation and storage facilities. this squeeze on the "independent" producer has the effect of increasing their dependence to the point where they can no longer control costs and prices or returns on their production. in fact, in certain instances and in certain spheres of petit commodity production in agriculture, it can be argued that the producer, far from being in control, is, rather, in possession of "sham property". as marx argues (the merchant) buys their (the independent producer's) labour and takes their property first in the form of the product, and soon after that the instrument as well, or he leaves it to them as sham property in order to reduce his own production costs (1973:510). this argument has been developed by hegedus in his distinction between ownership and possession of the means of production 11 (1976:95). the producer may "own" his property but the corporations which sell and buy from the producer may enjoy a"restricted-ownership exercise" or possession of the producer's means of production, labour power and product. the producer has often been forced to take conventional steps in order to survive such as increasing debt and attempts to increase productivity. as bernard bernier has so convincingly shown in his analysis of quebec agriculture, however, scale is "not a guarantee of rising income; for, the increase in productivity is more than offset by larger increases in expenses" (1976: 431). the same can be said of increased labour exploitation. as the percentage of labour costs goes up, so do management costs. at a certain level, the economic unit will either transform into a "capital" unit or it will have to increase labour productivity by further mechanization which, in turn, increases debt. this debt is not necessarily met with an increase in the price of the commodity. increases in debt are, in fact, often an important stage in the transformation of petit commodity producers or proletarianized labour (marx, 1971:435-441). other attempts which have been more successful in maintaininj independent units of production have been the development of marketing boards and co-operative structures as mechanisms to rationalize costs, production and price. these attempts help to develop a solution to the pressures of capital upon agricultural production. as marx argues: the moral of history... is that the capitalist system works against a rational agriculture, or that a rational agriculture is incompatible with the capitalist system . . . and needs either the alternate routes vol. 5 1982 12 small farmer living on his own labour or the control of associated producers (1971:121). what works specifically against a "rational" agriculture for capitalism is the long periods of "non-productive" (of value) time where large amounts of capital are tied up but create no value as well as factors such as climate and soil conditions which affect the production process and restrict the circulation of capital. it has also become increasingly difficult to exist strictly by one's own labour, due to the control over the input levels by capital and to land prices which do not reflect agricultural productivity. in response, many producers have formed associated organizations or co-operatives. petit commodity production in the okanagan valley tree fruit production in the okanagan valley has long been organized along co-operative lines. since 1939, singledesk selling (marketing control by one agency) through the grower owned british columbia tree fruits limited (bctf) has controlled the marketing of tree fruits in that province. as well as marketing control, the bctf has expanded into processing under the name of sun-rype limited and into controlled atmosphere storage under the name of british columbia fresh storage limited. these companies all come under the nominal control of the british columbia tree fruit growers association (bcfga). the 2200 members of the bcfga constitute the vast majority of the tree fruit producers in the okanagan valley. in the valley there are 2703 farms under crops and 91.6 per cent of these farms are classified as individual or family owned and operated farms. of the total number of crop producers 65.4 per cent are engaged in tree fruit production. 13 table 1 farms in the okanagan valley type acres % of growers % of land part-time 2-5 22 6 small commercial 5 -25 58 57 medium commercial 25 -60 8 24 large commercial 60 plus 1 11 these farms are generally small in size and, for the purpose of this study, are broken into four distinct categories (table 1) with 80 per cent of all tree fruit producers farming less than 25 acres, petit commodity production is the most common type of enterprise. these farms rely primarily upon family labour. the average small commercial farm will hire five to seven pickers at various times over a four month period to pick fruit as it ripens. it is estimated that wage labour constitutes 20 to 30 2 per cent of the total yearly labour. of the two larger categories, medium commercial farms rely to a greater extent on wage labour (estimated at 30 to 60 per cent of the total labour depending upon a number of variables such as family size and type of crop produced) , while the large commercial farm is a capitalist unit of production with more than 60 per cent reliance on wage labour. in my study, any farm requiring over 50 per cent wage labour is not considered a family owned and operated farm (mann and dickinson, 1978:477). the majority of production is destined for the fresh fruit market, a crucial market if small independent producers are to realize a price for their produce sufficiently high to allow them to continue production. fruit destined for processing is alternate routes vol. 5 1982 14 designated as "culls", and realizes only one third of the price of fresh fruit. the returns on processed fruit are, however, beginning to climb, comparatively, due to huge increases in packing costs of fresh fruit. for example, in 1972, packing costs represented 37.4 per cent of the total returns on all fruit commodities. this proportion of the cost has risen steadily and, by 1976, it constituted over 50 per cent of total returns (table 2) . table 2 british columbia tree fruits limited distribution of the sales dollar all commodities % 30grower — return to naked fruit packinghouse operation costs igencr «ium1 • fwoooctiom cott» taiiui acaimst iu.1 197« source: british columbia tree fruits limited annual reports. 15 this has created a problem for the grower in that the price of the commodity has not risen accordingly. the returns on apples and pears, for example, have remained constant in terms of sales value, and grower returns have decreased from approximately five cents a pound to less than three cents a pound (select standing committee on agriculture, 1978:10). the combined effects of climbing costs and diminishing returns has put the independent producers into a precarious position. this problem is exacerbated by the bctf's inability to generate fresh fruit markets capable of absorbing the majority of fruit produced. in certain commodities, the bctf has been unable to market even 50 per cent of the production. a case in point is cherries. in 1978, only 30 per cent of all cherries produced could be marketed through the association. consequently, much of the cherry production was marketed independently on roadside stands, the alternative being to have them designated as culls receiving a lower return. vast quantities were also sold to "fruitleggers" , or, directly, to wholesalers and retailers. the developing crisis in the industry's inability to market all of the fruit production through the bctf exploded in 1974. after numerous demonstrations and battles with the police, dissident growers put enough pressure on the provincial ndp government to have marketing restrictions lifted. this was done by instituting a farm income assurance program which would pay all farmers who stayed in the bcfga the difference between production and marketing quotas when the need arose. the only criterion for benefit would be marketing through the bctf. alternate routes vol. 5 1982 16 this development gave growers the legitimate right to sell independently, but as a consequence they would be struck from the bcfga and thus not be eligible for assurance benefits. even though most growers did not opt out of the bcfga, independent sales were, however, not curtailed. many farmers play both sides of the fence, selling to the bctf , in order to claim assurance benefits from the government, and then selling the remainder to "fruitrunners" from the lower mainland and alberta. according to government figures, more than 20 per cent of fruit production is sold outside agency control (select standing committee on agriculture, 1978:24), although some estimates are that up to 50 per cent of all producers are involved in this scheme (vancouver sun : june 19,1978:3). certainly, fruitlegging has become a lucrative business in the valley. in the 1960's it was common for a few people to arrive with half -ton trucks, buy fruit and then travel to alberta to sell if from roadside stands. by the mid-1970' s, fleets of semi -trailers were arriving to purchase 100 per cent of some farmers' production in commodities such as cherries. the fruitrunners would then travel throughout british columbia and the prairies, undercutting major retailers. this had the effect of pressure being put on the bcfga by major wholesalers and retailers, who threatened not to purchase through them if they did not control or clean up the industry. in fact, one of the major wholesalers and retailers in western canada is already being supplied outside the bctf. kelly douglas and super-valu (a part of the weston chain) is now purchasing from a newly formed, independent corporation. 17 two dissident growers, ronald fournier and graeme nelson, broke away from the bcfga and set up their own corporation, black sage orchards, which sells directly to kelly douglas. in 1979, this new corporation was being supplied by 75 orchardists and marketedin excess of 3/4 million pounds of apples to the weston empire. they undersold the bctf by a sufficient amount to enable super-valu to sell apples at twenty cents per pound below its competitors' price ( the province , october 5,1979:a2). safeway, the other major retailer in western canada, is contemplating following suit. the major saving that these "independents" have achieved is in the packaging of the fruit. since, for example, they do not wax and individually pack apples, they can realise a higher profit than they can on the returns they receive from the bctf. they can still sell cheaper to the wholesalers and retailers than the bctf can. the long term effect of this trend will be to erode industry protection of single-desk marketing. this, in turn, will allow large wholesalers and retailers to play producers off against each other. potentially, this situation may create a severe economic crisis among petit commodity producers in the valley, one from which they may not recover. at this stage, larger productive units will become increasingly viable and necessary. and, with larger productive units, mechanization and production for processing become possible. the advantages of discord in the industry for capital, whether processors, wholesalers or retailers, are obvious. discord allows increasing control and the merging of okanagan tree fruit production into a capitalist organized and alternate routes vol. 5 1982 18 controlled market. this may allow the producers to remain owners of their property but they will have lost more of what they possess as a result of their production by losing the ability to even partially determine price by control over marketing. in order for that to occur, the protection that petit commodity producers have provided for themselves must be eroded. a second factor creating pressure on petit commodity producers in the okanagan valley is that of agricultural land prices. the price of farm land in the okanagan has been going up rapidly, in spite of the freeze put on agricultural land bv the creation of the agricultural land reserves. these reserves were created to protect agricultural land for future use and thus to aid the survival of viable farm units. this was seen as an important step in protecting british columbia agriculture. prime agricultural land in the province occupies less than 1 per cent of the total land area. land suitable for fruit production occupies only l/100th of 1 per cent of the land area (british columbia land commission, 1975 : 5) . agricultural land is generally "lost" through three related processes (environment canada, 1978 : 4-4) . the first is through direct conversion to urban, commercial, industrial, or transport use. the second is through indirect urban impacts such as recreational development. the third is through economic decline and uncertainty in the agricultural industry. in the okanagan, pressures to take over farm land are generally related to growth in the recreation industry and urban growth. unfortunately for the agricultural industry in the valley, 19 lake frontage, the most desirable land, is also prime agricultural land. although the vast majority of producers support legislation protecting farm land (environment canada, 1978:73), organizations such as the okanagan mainland real estate board, various construction firms, and municipal councils frequently put pressure on the provincial cabinet to "unfreeze" certain land. others, such as private entrepreneurs with known social credit affiliation, have put pressure on the government to take land out of the reserve. a prime example is that of tom capozzi, a long-time social credit party supporter, who attempted to remove 1400 acres for subdivision into "ranchettes" to be sold to retiring albertans. he was so confident about the successful outcome of his application that he went ahead with subdivision and roadbuilding before a formal decision was made. while still under protection, the price of his land rose from $350 an acre in 1972 to $1750 an acre in 1979 (vancouver sun , october 27 , 1979 :a10) . this speculation in reserve land is not unusual in the okanagan valley, nor in the province as a whole. the implementation of land reserves has had two immediate effects: a rise in land prices for non-reserve land and demands for exclusion of certain lands from reserve protection. this also had the effect of increasing the price of protected land since the government has been amenable to passing orders-incouncil to release land, upon request, bypassing the protective commission. this made speculating in agricultural reserve land, for eventual removal, quite lucrative. alternate routes vol. 5 1982 20 two related pressures developed on agricultural petit commodity production. further growth through the acquisition of more land was stunted, and secondly, younger or new producers were discouraged from entering agriculture. a number of producers, being squeezed by an increasing price/debt trap, became quite amenable to selling out. the only way a number of producers stood to gain from their enterprise was to sell out and reap the benefits of rapidly rising land prices. rather than attempting to discourage speculation in agricultural land, the provincial government fed the uncertainty of land protection through erratic approval of apllication for land reserve removals. conclusion the net effect of problems in the co-operative organization of tree fruit production and the protected today/ >;one tomorrow land policies of the provincial government is a crisis in petit commodity production in the okanagan. it is a crisis that has very real consequences for the maintenance and reproduction of petit commodity production as the basis of agriculture in the valley. in terms of maintenance and reproduction, land prices ire too high to encourage the upcoming generation of producers to enter farming. land prices further encourage the selling of agricultural land to reap the benefits of high prices. this may suit present growers, but it will have devastating effects on future agricultural production. if the land is not removed from production through sales, then it will likely be transformed into larger capital units, either directly 21 controlled by a newly developing agrarian bourgeoisie or controlled by a hired manager on behalf of a non-farming owner or corporate enterprise holding the land for speculation. in either case, the land is removed from fresh fruit production. the so-called "new agrarian bourgeoisie" will likely mechanize and grow crops for processing since fresh fruit production is too labour intensive to be profitable. non-farming owners may be expected to remove agricultural land from production and turn it into more profitable parking lots or condominium projects geared to the tourist industry. the second aspect of the crisis in petit commodity production, that of strains in the protective umbrella of single-desk selling, has accentuated the attractiveness of selling out. this occurs w"hen sufficient income cannot be generated through' production. the crisis in co-operation in the valley has the potential of accelerating the transformation of production to larger units of production. it likewise has the potential to increase the necessity of having to augment family income by off -farm labour, if complete bankrupcy is to be avoided. there is, of course, also the possibility that the petit commodity producers will weather this storm, as they have others in the past. this time, however, they are beset by other problems. the importation of cheap fresh and processed products has cut into the industry's share of the market and farm labour problems are increasing and will lead to higher labour costs. last year, the newly formed canadian farmworkers' union started organizing in the valley. this will alternate routes vol. 5 1982 22 put pressure on the small producer and help accelerate the transformation of the industry away from petit commodity based productive units. also, the costs of increasing productivity through technology are growing at a faster rate than are the returns on production. in conclusion, the basis of the crisis of continued existence of petit commodity producers lies in the relationship between petty commodity producers and the larger capitalist economy. numerous pressures, two of which are dealt with in this paper, are brought to bear on these producers. as a class, they are waging a constant struggle with the larger capitalist economy to avoid being swallowed up or proletar ianized. their long-term survival prospects seem bleak. they have always been bleak. historically, they have played a role compatible with the needs of the larger capitalist economy and it is far from clear that this role has ceased. independent producers have persevered, creating new solutions to contradictions which in turn generate new contradictions requiring new solutions. their survival is due, in part to the nature of agricultural production, and, in part, to the needs of capital. it is not always beneficial for corporate capital to enter all spheres of production. 23 notes the same climatic conditions which make tree fruit production possible, also make this area a very desirable place for recreational activities, including a commodified tourist industry. farmers and speculators in the tourist industry are competing for the same land, the price of which increasingly reflects the higher prices that the investors in the recreation industry can offer. it is difficult to compare the exact amount of wage labour with family labour due to the lack of compatible statistical dat a .however , the small commercial and part-time farms hire wage labour only at peak picking times and during the rest of the year rely upon family labour . the estimate of 20 to 30 per cent hired labour comes from a comparison of farm labour pool data, census data and interviews with farmers. the estimates for the larger units were somewhat easier due to more permanent employment of wage labour and clearer statistical data. "fruitleggers" and "fruitrunners" are terms given to private entrepreneurs who come into the valley, buy fruit directly from the producers and then sell the fruit to small retailers and on roadside stands throughout the western provinces. since this bypasses the marketing control of the bctf, it is seen as an illegal activity. references bernier, bernard 1976 "the penetration of capitalism in agriculture." canadian review of sociology and anthropology 13, 4: 422-434. flinn, william and frederick h.buttel 1980 "sociological aspects of farm size: ideological and social consequences of scale in production." american journal of agricultural economics 1980: 946-953 . hedley, max , . .. 1976a "independent commodity production and the dynamics of tradition." canadian review of sociology and anthropology 13, 4: 413-4zj>gy and anthropology alternate routes vol. 5 1982 24 1976b "the social conditions of production and the dynamics of tradition: independent commodity production in canadian agriculture." doctoral dissertation, university of alberta, edmonton . hegedus, andras 1976 socialism and bureaucracy . london: allison and busby. maclennan, carol and richard walker 1980 "crisis and change in u.s. agriculture: an overview." agribusiness in the americas . burbach, roger and patricia flynn, edit. new york: monthly review press: 21-40. mann, susan and james m. dickinson 1978 "obstacles to the development of a capitalist agriculture." journal of peasant studies 5: 466-481. manning, edward w. and sandra s. eddy 197 8 agricultural land reserves of british columbia: an impact analysis . ottawa: environment canada. marx, karl „ «.«., ». 1967a capital , vol. 1. moscow: progress publishers. 1967b capital , vol. 2. moscow: progress publishers. 1971 capital , vol. 3. moscow: progress publishers. 1973 grundrisse . new york: vintage books. okanagan historical society 1964 "british columbia fruit growers association." the twenty -eighth report of the okanagan historical society . kelowna : 149-191 . raup, p. 1978 "some questions of value and scale in american agriculture." american journal of agricultural economics 60 : 503 -308 . select standing committee on agriculture 1978 the british columbia tree fruit industry . victoria : government of british columbia. shaw, paul 1979 canada's farm population . ottawa: statistics canada. 25 statistics canada 197 3 1971 census of canada, agriculture: british columbfa t ottawa : statistics canada. 197 8 1976 census of canada, agriculture: british columbia"! ottawa : statistics canada . the peoples food commission 1979 are your oysters ready dear? vancouver: the peoples food commission report to british columbia. 1980 the land of milk and money . canada: the alger press. veltmeyer, henry 1979 "the capitalist underdevelopment of atlantic canada." underdevelopment and social movements in atlantic canada . brym, r. j . and r. james sacauman , edit . toronto: new hogtown press: 17-35. warnock, j. 1971 "the farm crisis." essays on the left . lapierre, l e_t al, edit . toronto : mc lei land and stewart. alternate routes vol. 5 1982. graduate studies in sociology and anthropology carleton university the department of sociology and anthropology offers the following programs of advanced study and research: m.a. and ph.d. degrees in sociology, with specialization in comparative social organization social demography ecology theory methodology m.a. degree in anthropology, with specialization in north american studies theory methodology information regarding admission requirements and financial support may be obtained from: coordinator of graduate studies department of sociology and anthropology carleton university ottawa, canada k1s 5b6 the myth of autonomy in family farm production bonnie ward agricultural practice on family farms throughout ontario history provides an example of independent commodity production. according to this description, farm producers own, operate and control the means of production (hedley, 1976:415; johnson, 1979:91). the autonomy of farm producers is derived from their ability to determine the conditions of production, for example, the type and quantity of commodity produced and application of technological innovation. the capacity of producers to influence the conditions of the sale and purchase of agricultural goods significantly influences the degree of productive autonomy characteristic of farming. in a capitalist society where private ownership prevails, and the autonomy of owners is seen as providing scope for the expansion of production and innovation, the real relation between ownership and autonomy mi_st be made explicit. it will be argued that the real relationship between ownership and autonomy in farm practice is an historical relationship which is determined and conditioned by: 1. the transformation of the mode of production in society, 2. the transformation of the relations of production immediate to farming, 3. the role of the state in these transformations. through the examination of these historical processes it appears that the autonomy of small farm producers at present is a myth. farm production seems to be increasingly characterized not by autonomy but by dependency; dependency among members of farm families and of small farmers on the state. the transformation of the mode of production may be more precisely described as the process by which a particular mode of production emerges as dominant in a society. in ontario history, the most significant transformation in this regard is the emergence of the * revised version of a paper presented to the canadian sociology and anthropology association, saskatoon, june, 1979. capitalist mode of production. the rise of capitalism has two effects: capitalist relations may replace previously existing relations of production, or previously existing relations of production may be retained but in a new relation to the capitalist market. in ontario farm history both effects can be observed. at present, in ontario, there is evidence that the production of agricultural commodities is increasingly organized by capitalist relations (warnock:123; johnson, 1979:94). the replacement of the family farm by corporate (capitalist) farming occurs after the incorporation of family farm production into the capitalist market. in fact, it is incorporation of the family farm into capitalist market relations which results in the eventual elimination of increasing numbers of small farms. the process by which family farm production is transformed by the emergence of capitalism is the context for the analysis of the relation between ownership and autonomy. h. saffioti, describing the emergence to dominance of the capitalist mode of production, states: a mode of production is dominant insofar as it interferes vertically in other modes of production thus provoking the latter's loss of autonomy and redefining their specific activities . . . hence they are only able to survive thanks to a process of redefinition governed by the capitalist mode of production ... what remains are precapitalist work relations which now have new connotations. (1977:30) vertical interference by the capitalist mode of production describes the process which has transformed independent commodity production in agriculture. the family farm persists but under conditions substantially altered by the capitalist market. competitive conditions for marketing agricultural produce confront the farmer as pressure for specialization, with consequent risks of overproduction, and loss in real income in addition to the natural/biological risks of agricultural production 50 (smith, 1978:19-23; mitchell, .1975:18-21; hedley, 1976:417). what is clearly suggested by the vertical interference of capitalism is the possibility of retaining individual ownership while experiencing significant alteration in other conditions of production. the alteration of market conditions and pressure for specialization with its concomitant risks, result in risk minimizing practices which may in themselves limit productivity (hedley, 1976:418). the double bind that emerges with transformed productive conditions limits the autonomy of the farmer in terms of the type and quantity of goods produced, the scale of operation and the necessity of adopting technological innovations in order to remain competitive. vertical interference of the capitalist mode of production limits autonomy further in the sphere of ownership of the means of production. the necessity of greater investment in land and machinery in order to maintain competitive levels of production leads to ever increasing dependence on credit and corporate controlled production and marketing of farm machinery, fertilizer and fuel. that is, there emerges a dependence of the farmer on capitalist relations for the necessities of productive consumption. the increasing determination by capitalist market relations of not only the type and quantity of product but also the costs of production continually narrows the sphere of autonomy of agricultural producers. is the integration of independent commodity production in agriculture into capitalist market relations simply a precursor to the eventual demise of all "family farm" production? evidence of the increasing corporatization of agriculture and the decrease in small farms have led some to conclude that this is the case (johnson, 1979:98). there are, however, factors and conditions which mediate the tendency to corporatization and the erosion of small farm production. 51 it appears that certain types of agricultural production (e.g. fruit, tobacco) are particularly amenable to organization on capitalist lines, whereas other sectors retain more traditional forms of productive organization. region also appears to be a mediating factor in the corporatization process. the comparison of the rate of corporatization of agriculture in ontario and quebec reveals that quebec agricultural practice may be more resistant to change (johnson, 1979:98). protective legislation and tax concessions which benefit individual farmers may be understood as legitimating activities of the state which affect the corporatization process. to the extent that tradition, region and ideology may influence the rate of corporatization of agriculture, their relationship to the transformation of the mode of production needs clarification. saffioti, in her analysis of the process of vertical interference with precapitalist forms of productive organization by the capitalist mode of production, postulates that this process has the effect of retaining only the economic aspect of precapitalist work, relations and eliminating their ideological aspect, which it replaces with bourgeois ideology (saf fioti :30) . such a hypothesized replacement of one ideology with another does not appear to adequately reflect the way in which world views change. while it seems likely that new productive relations generate new ideological counterparts, some aspects of traditional world views persist and continue to be reproduced. if ideas are viewed as singularly determined by productive relations, then the transformation of productive relations ought to lead directly to the transformation of ideas. however, this appears not necessarily to be the case. in the preceding discussion it was suggested that the conditions of farming have been significantly transformed such that the margin of autonomy of the small producer is increasingly reduced. in spite of the altered 52 conditions of production, autonomy persists ideologically as the counterpart of private ownership. belief in the autonomy of individual owners may persist as a result of the reluctance of individuals to alter their beliefs in accordance with changes in the world. alternately, this belief may be reproduced ideologically and serve to justify practices related to capitalist expansion. (owners of capitalist enterprises may have considerable autonomy) . ideological reproduction of the relation of ownership to autonomy in the context of capitalist development mystifies the real effects of that development for small agricultural producers. the latter explanation can be examined by reference to the degree of autonomy which existed in family farming historically. the myth of autonomy in agricultural production has its historical origins in the notion of the self sufficient agriculture of pioneer families. v. fowke has argued that self sufficiency is itself a myth "which is an integral part of canadian folklore" (fowke, 1962:23). far from self sufficiency, pioneer agriculture was characterized by the need for capital as a precondition for settlement, barter and the extension of credit as a means to provide for domestic and productive consumption, and the need for markets for surplus products (fowke, 1962). settlement of the canadian frontier was not the culmination of the pioneering dream of daring individuals. it was rather, a means to escape industrial labour, famine and political revolution (loyalists) and for some, the chance to acquire greater wealth and position. ontario pioneer settlements were not located by chance but were a product of british interest in providing defense for trade routes and for the provisioning of military personnel and traders (fowke, 1946:118). from the outset, it became apparent that settlement provided an excellent investment opportunity, not through agricultural production but in the movement of settlers. "there were profitable investment opportunities 53 associated with the original transfer and installation of prospective farm populations" (fowke, 1946:118). this relation is further evidenced by the responsibility of the bureau of agriculture established in 1852, for immigration policy (fowke, 1946:121). the combination of the dependence of farmers on market conditions (capital, barter, credit) and on the state for acquiring land is evidence of the interconnectedness of agricultural production with political and economic interests from its inception. while this interconnectedness does not necessarily imply a lack of autonomy, it does create a basis from which historical relations of dependence may be seen to emerge. v. fowke, in identifying the historical pattern in canadian agricultural policy states: the clearest and most significant uniformity regarding canadian agriculture for more than three hundred years has been its deliberate and consistent use as a basis for economic and political empire. (1978:3) while economic and political interests are significant in the determination of agricultural settlement, it would appear that at least for a time, a period of relative autonomy of agricultural producers could be said to have existed. this is in part due to periods of favourable market conditions and minimally due to the protective actions of the state (jones: 196, 307). in addition, it could be argued that productive relations organized on the basi6 of collective labours of family members contributed to the possibility of a relative degree of autonomy in agricultural production. the family constitutes a basis for production from which a considerable number of benefits can be derived. the division of labour among family members facilitated the diversification of production which contributed both to domestic consumption and to the production of commodities. the work of women, often associated with production closer 54 to the home, could be drawn upon at times when additional labour was required in the fields. the contribution of children to agricultural production beginning at an early age provided additional necessary labour (johnson, 1974:17). when inadequate resources were available for establishing a farm, family members worked for wages before or during the early years of settlement (fowke, 1962:32-33). the intense labour required and the need for financial resources in agriculture prior to 1850 necessitated a co-operative productive unit like the family for survival (johnson, 1974:15-22). however, these conditions would change. the introduction of mass education and use of technology in agricultural production were significant in the change in participation of family members (johnson, 1974:23). with increasing specialization and transformation of productive relations, women (and children) became increasingly separated from the production of commodities. this separation was enhanced ideologically by the emergent role of 'chatelaine 1 , the wife of the 'better class' of entrepreneur. the agricultural practice of the wealthiest settlers was thus set up as the model for all agricultural practice. this point is illustrated by the tendency for the wealthiest settlers to be the organizers of agricultural societies and the initiators of technological innovation (jones :157, 174). similarly, the separation of the "chatelaine" from the production of commodities may have exerted ideological pre-eminence over relations of interdependence of family members which characterized most farming. at this point i would like to note that i am somewhat skeptical about historical accounts of the time and degree of separation of women from agricultural commodity production. it is unclear whether the productive relations described are those of the majority of farmers or of "ideal" (affluent) farmers. for the moment, this question must be 55 suspended pending further investigation. what is clear however, is that while there may be evidence of the decreasing role of women in commodity production (hedley, 1977:6; johnson, 1974:24) the work of women in creating conditions for continued commodity production is significant. women have often taken on tasks of bookkeeping and business management (kohl, 1978:52). women's role in reproduction and domestic work also provides the basis for long and short run production of labour power required by the enterprise. further, the efforts of the family, particularly of women, toward decreasing consumption of commodities and the production of use value offers a measure of protection in "lean" times. more relevant in recent times would be the contribution by family members of wages. as input of capital comes to have ever increasing importance, family members more frequently have off-farm employment. it may be argued that the shift from interdependence of family members in agricultural labour to dependence on family members for wage inputs is a qualitative change. analysis of the significance of wage inputs to the persistence of many family farm operations in ontario warrants further investigation and evidence. in all of the above ways, the productive interdependence of family members has contributed greatly to creating conditions of flexibility in an enterprise vulnerable to "acts of god", of the market and of the state. this flexibility could be said to account for the relative degree of autonomy differentially experienced by farm producers historically. as is implicit in the foregoing discussion, the capacity of internal relations of family farm production to offer protection from transformed market conditions is limited. m. hedley states, "the significance of the involvement of domestic producers in commodity production is that reproduction of the mode of production is unavoidably 56 dependent on the process of exchange" (hedley, 1977: a). this dependency is at present mediated by the state through agricultural policy, trade policy, supervision of marketing boards, and tax, succession and zoning laws, to name a few examples. fowkes' thesis of the dependence of farm producers on dominant economic and political interests, extended into the present, suggests there is little basis for believing that small producers will, in the long run, be offered any measure of protection. this skepticism is well founded, as an examination of the report of the task force on agriculture, (1967) reveals. the recommendations of this report include : 1. reduction of the number of farms with about 2/3 of farm families removed. 2. increase in farm size. 3# greater rationalization of farming with an increase in "backward, forward, horizontal integration" with agricultural business interests. 4. "a clearcut separation of welfare and commercial farm policy". (summarized from warnock, 1971:126) my emphasis the government disowned this report without providing a substitute policy (cayley, 19.73:8). however, a detailed analysis of the historical conditions which give rise to recommendations of this sort is required. points like the emergence of an overlap in "welfare and commercial policy" obviously need to be examined. these recommendations are indicative of the extensive involvement of the state in the reproduction and transformation of agricultural production and certainly suggest the emergence of dependency and the almost complete erosion of the autonomy of small producers. some further, and perhaps less obvious, characteristics of the role of the state may be suggested. if in fact an appropriation of ideologies of pre-capitalist modes of production occurs, what is the concrete 57 character of that appropriation? one example would be the continued affirmation of individual patriarchal ownership (see hedley, 1977:7). this clearly denies the history of productive interdependence of family members in favour of a definition which reproduces an individualistic ideology and the legal subordination of women. at the interpersonal level, this relation is reproduced in the reluctance of federal and provincial bureaucratic agents to deal with farmers' wives in business matters (kohl, 1978:51). kohl states: "the formal definition of the male role as the official 'producer' in north american society is based on and reinforced by the embodiment of that status in law" (1978:51). in marketing, the state has played a primary mediating role in the establishment and control of production quotas through marketing boards. the protection offered to farmers through these agencies is useful only insofar as increases in productivity and conditions of the purchase of quota facilitate the expansion necessary for survival. this places the small producers in an increasingly vulnerable position (cayley, 1973:5). it appears that autonomy in agricultural production has been progressively eroded by the transformation of market conditions. the internal relations of production of the family farm offer a limited amount of protection from these tendencies. the state, while periodically offering limited protection to individual producers, ultimately functions to facilitate that development and expansion of capitalist interests. in spite of these developmental tendencies, the ideology of autonomy derived from private ownership of the means of production persists and is reproduced. in terms of highly visible cultural tendencies, the "back to nature" movement and the purchase of hobby farms by members of high income groups reaffirm the myth of autonomy. loss of ownership (the final loss of autonomy) is explained in terms of the "inefficiency" of producers. this explanation serves to 58 transpose a characteristic defined by the mode of production to a statement of the inadequacy of an individual producer. as long as the loss of autonomy of individual producers can be explained in terms of their individual shortcomings, changes at the level of the social organization of production remain unexamined. the framework for analysis outlined in the preceding discussion yields several areas requiring further investigation: 1. the persistence of farm based independent commodity production in certain sectors delimited by type of production, geography and culture needs to be examined. to what extent does independent commodity production in these sectors serve the interests of capitalist expansion? that is, to what extent are the risks borne by the producers such that corporatization of that sector would be a poor investment? a further question raised is the extent that corporatization of agriculture is impeded by traditional practices and by cultural considerations. research into these questions would contribute greatly to an understanding of the transformation of farming which occurs with the emergence of capitalism in ontario. 2. the relations of production on the family farm, i have argued, offer certain limited protection to the enterprise by providing some flexibility. in the present day, the most significant contribution of family members residing on small farms may be the income they derive from other sources. a work-farm pattern is emerging in canadian agriculture. in ontario, it would be worthwhile to look at the wage contributions of farm wives as i suspect they may be significant for the persistence of many small farm operations. the transformation from interdependence in production of family members to dependence on wage inputs for security of the farm is a phenomenon which remains unexamined. 3. a third area requiring elaboration is the role of the state. 59 critical analyses of the state are fairly recent and the complexity of thia task makes it formidable. such analyses as applied to farming would have to encompass the mediating role of the state in the market, the ideological function of the state and political parties* and the history and impact of agrarian protest movements, to mention only several aspects. this task is central to work in agricultural history because of the peculiar relation of political practice to agriculture from the first settlements. while the scope of the analytic task here outlined is broad, a more comprehensive analysis of the determinants of agricultural production is required. it is essential that analyses cease to focus on "inefficiency" and "traditionalism" of individual producers and become recast at the level of explaining individual practice in terms of the social relations of production. the relation between autonomy and individual ownership must be demystified in order that the collective interests of farm producers can be articulated. the realities of productive organization rather than their ideological representations are the only adequate basis for political action of farm producers. department of sociology/ queen's university 60 references cayley, david 1973 "the rise of the national fanners union." this magazine , vol. 7, no. 3. fowke, vernon c. 1946 canadian agricultural policy the historical pattern . toronto: university of toronto press. 1962 "the myth of the self sufficient canadian pioneer." transactions of the royal society of canada , vol. lvi , series iii. hedley, max j. 1976 "independent commodity production and the dynamics of tradition." canadian review of sociology and anthropology , 13, 4. 1977 "transformation of the domestic mode of production." paper presented at the annual meetings of the canadian sociology and anthropology association, fredericton. johnson, leo. 1972 "the development of class in canada in the twentieth century," in g. teeple, ed., capitalism and the national question in canada . toronto: university of toroi.to press. 1974 'the political economy of ontario women in the nineteenth century," in women at work ontario 1850-1930 . toronto: canadian women's educational press. 1979 "precapitalist economic formations and the capitalist market in canada 1911-1971," in j. curtis and w. g. scott, eds., social stratification: canada . scarborough: prentice-hall. jones, robert l. 1977 the history of agriculture in ontario 1613-1880 . toronto: university of toronto press. kohl, seena b. 1976 working together: women and the family in south western saskatchewan . toronto: holt, rinehart and winston. 1978 "women's participation in the north american family farm." women's studies international quarterly , vol. 1, no. 1. mitchell, don. 1975 the politics of food . toronto: james lorimer and co. saffioti, heleieth i. b. 1977 "women, mode of production and social formations." latin american perspectives , vol. 4, nos . 1 § 2. 61 smith, pamela 1978 "comments on the analysis of the political economy of canadian agriculture." paper presented at the political economy session, learned societies meetings, london, ont. taylor, norma 1976 '"all this for three and a half a day': the farm wife," in g. matheson, ed., women in the canadian mosaic . toronto: peter martin associates. warnock, john w. 1971 "the farm crisis" in l. lapierre, e_t. al . , eds., essays on the left. toronto: mcclelland and stewart. 62 commentary : imaginaries and realities, utopia and dystopia | 265 commentary imaginaries and realities, utopia and dystopia garry potter is associate professor of sociology at wilfred laurier university (waterloo, ontario, canada) . he is author of the bet: truth in science, literature and everyday knowledges, the philosophy of social science: new perspectives, and co-edited (with jose lopez) after postmodernism . more recently he wrote and published dystopia: what is to be done? and made a documentary film of the same title . the film can be viewed for free and downloaded for educational purposes from the website www .dystopiafilm .com . introduction: contradictions of hope and despair the dystopia thesis is an analysis of humanity’s most serious problems of the present and a prediction of them being exacerbated and added to in the near future. i have presented this thesis in some detail in my 2010 book dystopia: what is to be done? i also made a documentary film of the same name that is available for free viewing (http://www. dystopiafilm.com). what i intend to do here, is to give a summarised flavour of the overall argument presented in the book and film, but also add some reflections upon the utopian dreams of both right and left, and more importantly consider the left’s continued failure to construct a left vision that captures ordinary people’s imagination and enthusiasm. the dystopia thesis propounds an argument that the structural features of the world political economy are such as to make the problems we collectively face impossible to solve. the dystopia thesis is grounded in present day fact and highly probabilistic trajectories and outcomes as regards the future. the logic and empirical content of the dystopia thesis concludes a near certain hopelessness with respect to avoiding a future of unimaginable horror and suffering. causally inter-connected, mutually enhancing catastrophes, are around the corner . . . and there is nothing we can do to prevent them yet at the same time, the dystopia thesis was founded on the contradiction of pessimistic assessment and sincere hope. if one believed absolutely in the hopelessness of any effort to avert catastrophe what would be the point in articulating the argument? 266 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times utopia and dystopia are bound up together in complex ways. both have their causal effects of interpenetration of imaginaries and realities. for example, both liberal and socialist utopias form a part of contemporary dystopian reality, as ideological barriers to an accurate understanding of both the present and future possibilities. the apocalyptic media visions of life after the bomb . . . or virus or asteroid strike etc. etc., also contribute to a lack of understanding of what is now and what might come to pass in the near future. these imaginaries are part of our dystopian reality because they serve to deceive and mystify us with regard to real problems. i will begin by summarising the dystopia thesis, giving particular attention to its knowledge, power and ideology component: the theory of structural mystification. i will then reflect upon some of the ways both utopian and dystopian fictions feed into this mystification. finally, i shall embrace the dystopia thesis’s own contradictions (that is to say my own) and discuss how a vision of hope is the only hope we have, how the dystopia thesis ultimately calls for a new marxist imaginary, a realistically feasible, yet nonetheless inspiring, utopian vision to sustain us in our struggles. this last component of this piece is perhaps too big to be anything other than a preliminary reflection here. it is a task i have been wrestling with ever since i began my work upon the dystopia thesis. the question of what is to be done was not part of my original project because quite frankly i only had the vaguest of vague ideas about what should be done. i was also, on some levels, persuaded that there was nothing to be done. i had only an instinct that sounding the alarm, as it were, might contribute to mitigating the horrors to come. however, as the project progressed it became clear that i simply could not present the dystopian vision and argument without engaging with potential strategies for dealing with the problems with respect to many of the dystopia thesis’s individual components, many people have provided far gloomier assessments than i. i tended to be rather cautious with predictions of catastrophe and apocalypse. but the cumulative emotional effect of seeing put together as a causally inter-linked conclusion, all the worst environmental problems facing humankind, along with all the most extreme suffering of poverty and disease, appeared to be too much for most of the people i consulted with. they told me that some strategies for the amelioration of crises had to at least be entertained, along with the analysis of their cause. some balance of hope had to be given along with analysis of calamity commentary : imaginaries and realities, utopia and dystopia | 267 however, my reflections upon the question of what is to be done began with critique. the analysis was of the inadequacies of many of the popular propounded solutions to the problems that were most serious. for example, the technocratic solutions to the world’s food or transport problems may have some value but miss the main point: the problems are most significantly political-economic problems rather than technological. for another example, charity may mitigate a small amount of suffering in the immediate present but cannot even begin to address the ocean of pain deriving from the systematically produced extremes of world poverty finally, i realized that utopian thinking, the right kind of utopian thinking that is, is actually a necessary counter-point to the dystopia thesis. it is a great irony that left-wing analysis, more specifically marxist analysis, is everywhere being proven correct and yet is not attended to. capitalism is in crisis on many fronts. there are rumblings of resistance and revolution in many parts of the world. and yet in the first world, most particularly in the american “heart of the beast”, where some of the contradictions of wealth and poverty are most extreme, the left has never been weaker . my conclusion with respect to this, is that while intellectual analysis of the problems has never been as acute, there still lacks an inspiring vision of a better world that is realistic enough for masses of people to see beyond the inertia of their present day to day living. reflection upon this situation shall be the conclusion of the article. the dystopia thesis the first argument of the dystopia thesis is that the future of misery and crisis that is dystopia is already here. perhaps a billion people live lives of such dreadful daily experience as to reduce any concerns about the future to the most immediate. they are starving or close to starving. they are watching their children being sold into the slavery of bonded labour or prostitution. they are dying of malaria or plague or tuberculosis or aids or any number of diseases. they live in a mundane poverty-stricken everyday life. or worse, they are incarcerated and perhaps are being tortured this very second. the list can go on and on through the drama of war and refugees, to the boredom and unpleasantness of under-paid, soul-destroying employment or unemployment. the future is already here for a billion people, if the future is dystopia the dystopia thesis’s predictions of the future are mainly simple probabilistic extensions of present problems being exacerbated. we are just beginning to see the effects of global warming but we can well 268 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times imagine increased future problems of flooding and hurricanes. and global warming is merely the most dramatic of the wide variety of environmental problems facing us. many of these link up with issues of resource shortages and energy. so yes, the dystopia thesis is a very simple argument in many respects: things that are bad now and are going to get worse however, entirely new problems are coming as well. peak oil will add to existing inequality, suffering, terrorism and warfare. but even more importantly, at some point, it will make our existing socio-political economic system impossible to maintain. there will be a post-carbon economy. this is coming whatever we do. but the dystopia thesis predicts an excruciatingly painful transition to this post-carbon future the dystopia thesis is also a causal analysis. on the one hand, it takes note of the immense complexity of inter-linkages of problems and causality. it observes the positive feedback loops and their snowballing effects. on the other hand, however, it posits a broad context of common structural causality. the world capitalist system possesses structural features that ensures extreme inequality and thus poverty. poverty is not only an effect that is suffered but is in turn a cause of many, many other problems. in this regard, the dystopia thesis is essentially marxist. it thus sees inequality, unemployment and poverty as features of the world political economy that are not contingent but rather are fundamental to the system unemployment rates (in any country), for example, may rise or fall; that much is contingent upon a variety of factors; but whether there is to be unemployment or not at all, that is not a variable. some level of unemployment is functionally necessary to the system. this is among the reasons why the dystopia thesis rejects reformism as a potential solution to the avoidance of dystopia the world capitalist system is just that, a world system1. globalization is not something new; it is an on-going developing process that emerged simultaneously with the birth of capitalism. the development of the richer countries was dependent upon the lack of development in the poorer. development and underdevelopment evolved together. the wealth of the rich, whether it be people or nations, is dependent upon the lack thereof by the poor the particularities of recent global economic change and the neo-liberal economic ideologies and policies that have driven them have had many dire consequences of course. but neo-liberalism per 1  i am indebted for the world systems theory here to immanual wallerstein and andre gunder frank. commentary : imaginaries and realities, utopia and dystopia | 269 se is not the real problem. capitalism is the real problem. a return to keynesian economic policies may well save capitalism from some of its contemporary crises . . . but it will not save us from dystopia2. it will not save the world; inequality will be maintained; the suffering of that inequality will be maintained; environmental destruction will continue unabated. in addition to a structural logic of profit which necessitates inequality, the world capitalist system has a structurally determined time-frame for decision and action. it has a temporal logic, which ensures that potentially beneficial decisions and actions of collective pain avoidance and responsible environmental stewardship will come too late. the peak oil problem can be used to clearly illustrate this. as we all know, the problem of peak oil is not that we will run out of oil eventually. rather it is that after the capacity for world production peaks, demand will not slacken but continue its ever increasing pressure. prices will dramatically rise to a point whereby the present world system of trade and commerce, of energy and transport, of agriculture and consumption, simply will not be able to continue without drastic change. we will move into what people are beginning to call a post-carbon world. the dystopian point with respect to the peak oil problem is not that a post-carbon world is necessarily a future to be feared. no, the problem, the future to be feared, is the transition to it. we could imagine (and people have, which we will discuss in a moment) a post-carbon economy and world as actually a good thing in many ways. what world capitalism will ensure is that the sensible planning in advance that would enable a smooth painless major transition of economy and lifestyle will not occur. capitalism’s political-economic temporal logic forbids it. there is a further key factor in capitalism which keeps our most serious problems from being effectively engaged with. this is the problem of power and knowledge and ideology. structural mystification structural mystification is the negative side of the dialectical contradiction found in the institutional production of knowledge. structural mystification exists as a counterpart to the real knowledge production and dissemination practices of the media, the education system and all other institutions fundamentally concerned with the production and dissemination of knowledge 2  see the excellent critique of the return to keynesian economics by richard wolff (2011). 270 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times the relationship between power and knowledge has been theorized in innumerable ways. ideology has also been theorized from many conflicting, and frequently confusing, perspectives. the key points of the theory of structural mystification, however, are clear and relatively simple3. power sometimes corrupts the production and dissemination of knowledge. but it is not as though the production of knowledge could take place without the influence of power relations. no, institutional power relations also facilitate the production and dissemination of knowledge. this is why the relationship between power and knowledge is dialectical. knowledge production (and dissemination) most significantly takes place within institutions. the institutions all have within them a dialectical contradiction for example, the university generally is fundamentally concerned with the production and dissemination of knowledge. this is not a contingent feature but essential to the very nature of what a university is. that that is not all the institution is, does not change this fact. knowledge production is fundamental in a way that having a football team is not (however important that may be for some universities). but also fundamental to the very nature of a university, is the dialectical opposite to knowledge production and dissemination: the obfuscation of the production of knowledge and the restriction and sometimes outright prevention of the dissemination of knowledge. while all university faculty would be forced to acknowledge that this sometimes occurs, few are aware that it is not a contingent feature the university, amongst other things, is a complex structural hierarchy of power relations. further, it is connected to the broader hierarchies and complexities of the power relations of the world . . . of the world capitalist system. this is not any simple matter of conspiracy or propaganda or intentional distortion. rather the production and dissemination of knowledge takes place at the nexus of many different levels of conflict there is frequently a conflict between the institution and the government in terms of priorities of spending on research and pedagogy, and in terms of academic freedom of speech and critique and dissent. there is an ongoing conflict between the priorities of the board of governors and the university senate. there is a constant scrambling over scarce resources between faculties and departments. there is genuine intellectual debate and politically coerced loyalties and acts of bad faith. there is not only conflict between individuals but conflict within individuals. 3  for a more complete account see potter, 2010c. commentary : imaginaries and realities, utopia and dystopia | 271 there is a struggle to “do the right thing” and a struggle to know what that is. it is both a moral and an intellectual struggle . . . and one that takes place very often within a mystifying fog . . . a mystifying fog that they both suffer and frequently help to construct. it is not for nothing that the word “academic” also has a pejorative sense to it. and as pierre bourdieu (1988, p. 207) puts it, academics are often “mystified mystifiers” the first ideological victims of the operations of power and classification they perform. structural mystification is also structurally embedded within science itself. yes, even that tremendous tool for acquiring information and potential understanding of so many things is frequently corrupted through its practical and ideological contextualization within the wider political economy. and yet science on another level, is absolutely our only hope of coming to terms with the crises of dystopia. there is a plethora of examples to choose from to make these points about science here. but i will briefly mention the “hydrogen highway” and hydrogen automobile. the hydrogen car (in a variety of formats) is often propounded by politicians and auto makers as the future solution to the problems of global warming and peak oil. it doesn’t use oil and it doesn’t pollute (directly). there is not space in this article to go into the practical limitations of this technology in relation to the political economy of it. these have been thoroughly explored elsewhere (see for example demirbas, 2009, romm, 2005, and the unattributed article on the alternative energies website). no, the major importance of the hydrogen “solution” is mystificatory. its practical realization is always far enough in the future as to necessitate a continuance of the gasoline vehicle status quo. the utopian promise of the idea is sufficient though, to deflect political action toward any more immediately viable technological solutions knowledge production and dissemination, including scientific knowledge production and dissemination, is profoundly affected by politics . . . and politics is profoundly affected by knowledge . . . and the lack of it. the problems of dystopia, whether global poverty or global warming, require radical change. radical change requires significant mass-scale collective political will. political will requires knowledge. the knowledge gets produced, as does its mystifying ideological counter-arguments and “facts”. the knowledge gets distributed . . . on a restricted scale. the knowledge gets produced and receives a restricted dissemination but the ideological counter-points are trumpeted and/or subtly and insidiously whispered in the media, or taught in the schools or even at home 272 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times among the most potent elements of dystopia with respect to knowledge and ideology are the utopian visions that grab the collective imagination. the utopian imaginaries are part and parcel of our dystopian reality. the utopian dream of capitalist reform slavoj zizek quotes john caputo (caputo and vattimo, 2009, p. 124-125) to make a point about utopian thinking concerning the possibilities of reforming the capitalist system: i would be perfectly happy if the far left politicians in the united states were able to reform the system by providing universal health care, effectively redistributing wealth more equitably with a revised irs code, effectively restricting campaign financing, enfranchising all voters, treating migrant workers humanely, and effecting multilateral foreign policy that would integrate american power within the international community etc., i.e., intervene upon capitalism by means of serious and far-reaching reforms. . . if after doing all that badiou and zizek complained that some monster called capital still stalks us, i would be inclined to greet that monster with a yawn. zizek (2009, p. 79) does not dispute whether such reforms would make for a better world, or even if we might be better able to remain within the system if such far reaching reforms were possible. instead he argues that: the problem lies with the “utopian premise” that it is possible to achieve all that within the coordinates of global capitalism. what if the particular malfunctionings of capitalism enumerated by caputo are not merely accidental disturbances but are rather structurally necessary? just to be completely clear, i will answer zizek’s rhetorical question. the “malfunctionings” are not such at all; the ill treatment of migrant workers, for example, is certainly a moral shame, but it is not because of an accidental flaw in the system. no, it and the rest enumerated by caputo, are structurally necessary to the system. utopian visions and dystopian realities vision. this is what we would like to see in our political leaders. in america, and elsewhere as well of course, but especially in america, vision is in short supply. so we are given utopian fiction. but it is often presented not as a vision of the future but as a pious hope for the present, through the idealized glasses of memory. it was not president bush or clinton or reagan that gave us this poetized vision, a: commentary : imaginaries and realities, utopia and dystopia | 273 . . . reminder of the time when two powerful nations challenged each other and then boldly raced into outer space. what would be the next thing to challenge us, that makes us go farther and work harder? you know when smallpox was eradicated? it was considered the single greatest humanitarian achievement of the century. surely we can do it again. as we did in a time when our eyes looked towards the heavens and with outstretched fingers, we touched the face of god. yes, poetic indeed, but it was president bartlett of the west wing (episode 5, 1999), not obama, that articulated this vision of past and future. its resonance, of course, is with kennedy and the beginnings of the “space race”. but along with kennedy’s perceived martyrdom (to what exactly?, i often wonder) goes a collective amnesia of the real fear of nuclear holocaust and a total ignorance of what was really going on with the cuban missile crisis. forgotten also, is the bay of pigs; and most of all it is forgotten that it was with kennedy that the american involvement in vietnam began the eradication of smallpox was undoubtedly a truly wonderful achievement. bartlett says: “surely we can do it again”. and of course this should be true. but this utopian moral imperative, stands alongside the historical reality of the tragic failure to eradicate malaria. in 1958, the worldwide effort to eradicate malaria began in earnest. it was led by paul russell from harvard’s school of public health. the united states congress directly allocated $23 million a year towards the battle. it also provided 90 percent of the world health organization’s anti-malaria budget and a significant proportion of the budgets of the pan-american health organization and unicef (united nations children’s education foundation). this constituted a financial commitment in the order of billions in today’s dollars. it was a serious commitment to eradicate a serious collective human problem. but it also was an effort with a definite time limit to it. paul russell in his international development advisory board report emphasized the time line of malaria eradication: four years of ddt spraying and four years of monitoring that there are three consecutive years of no mosquito transmission in an area. he also emphasized the dangers of failing to complete the program of eradication: ddt resistance, renewed disease pandemics and a virtual economic impossibility of having another attempt in the future be successful. a four-year commitment was made, and four years of funding was what was given. four years were nearly enough. in 1955, sri lanka had a million cases of malaria. in 1963, it had only eighteen. 274 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times only another two or three years of concerted effort and financial commitment would have given the world the same success with malaria as it had had with smallpox. but the funding was cut off4. the result, of course, was not merely the failure to eradicate something that was eradicable. the result was to make the problem worse, much worse. the insects developed resistance to ddt and other pesticides. the malarial parasites developed resistances to quinine, chloroquine and other drugs. most importantly, in areas where the mosquitoes and disease would almost certainly make a comeback, many millions of people now lacked all resistance to the disease. by cutting off funding to the eradication efforts, congress and the other “money people” were condemning millions of people to death in the future. such is the relationship between the time frame for capitalist political economic planning and future calamity. such is the relation between eloquent vision and a sad reality. but if the harsh reality stands in contrast to utopian vision there is something rather pathetic about the vision as well. people often imagine utopia as something very like small town america in the fifties. the dark side of this hope was portrayed nicely in the film pleasantville (ross, 1998). but as good as this film was, it cannot stand in comparison to the real life utopian monument to this vision of the world. i’m speaking here of the disney-built small town celebration near disney world in florida. it looks like main street usa in disney land but it is a real town that people live and work in. as someone once put it “it just seems to be the perfect little town back in a nicer time. except it feels creepy”.5 what is to be done? the answers to the question of what is to be done which i gave in my book and film were all fairly obvious. they could be fundamentally articulated in a number of traditional leftist slogans: “the people (the left, the workers) united will never be defeated”, “union!”, “one solution, revolution” “occupy, resist, produce” and so on. i advocated boycotts and protests and taking it to the street. i criticized reformist compromise and charitable band-aids. in short, i advocated what the radical left has advocated for years. that these activities and slogans are obvious does not diminish their importance nor their power to effect change (witness tunisia 4  i am indebted to laurie garret’s excellent (1995, p. 48-52) account for all the factual information of this history. 5  name withheld by request. commentary : imaginaries and realities, utopia and dystopia | 275 or egypt for recent examples of this). but still, in the face of all the forces of structural mystification, something crucial seems lacking. the masses may have been teeming into the streets of tunis and cairo; the poor may have come down from the shanty towns of caracas to have thwarted the 2002 coup in venezuela, but. . .while the arrest report of toronto’s 2010 g20 protests was impressive in terms of numbers, the numbers of people who merely peacefully marched in protest was on a relative scale, pitifully small. most torontonians, most canadians, simply went about their ordinary business and watched the violence on tv as a spectacle which had nothing to do with them. my point here again is obvious; cairo and toronto are different worlds; the developed and the developing, the core and the periphery, are miles apart in present political potential, as well as in terms of their economies but the problem is that we are one world; so the “first world” needs a revolution too. but the political consciousness is not there. . .or rather it is not here . there are contradictions in this. the majority of the affluent middle classes in countries such as canada or the us cannot seem to grasp what is obvious to millions of peasants and workers in the developing world. is it that their affluence blinds them? some would have us think so. but there is more to it than that marxist analysis of capitalism is repeatedly, and everywhere, being proven correct. right wing ideology is not faring well. we have had, for example, such an intellectual big gun for laissez-faire capitalism as alan greenspan admitting he was fundamentally wrong. . . about everything. yet in north america and europe, the left has never been weaker. why? i don’t presume to reduce the answer to this question to a single cause. however, i do want to focus here upon one of the causes. the left has thus far failed to articulate a positive vision of the future that truly catches people’s imagination! there is, of course, a good historical and analytical set of reasons for this failure. early in its history socialist thought divided in terms of hard and soft. proponents of these softer versions of socialism seemed to spend a lot of time dreaming. for many marxists the term “utopian socialism” was a pejorative. . .and rightly so. to spell out in great detail a picture of the future without having paid any attention to the process of getting there, without a proper appreciation of the problems of the present, is utopian in this negative sense, simply because the thinking is unrealistic. 276 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times it may be the case that there also is a certain, necessarily utopian element, to the dream of overthrowing of capital. but can one dream and still be realistic? can we fly and yet be grounded? good marxist analysis does not predict too specifically about the future. it rightly concludes that there are simply too many variables for such to be sensibly done. so where does that leave us? one of the excellent stunts of the yes men (2009) has given me an idea in this regard. they printed and distributed a hoax version of the new york times. this satirical version of the times had such headlines as “iraq war ends”, “maximum wage law succeeds” “popular pressure ushers recent progressive tilt: study cites movements for massive shift in dc” and “nationalized oil to fund climate change efforts”. there was a small caption by their times banner that gave me the idea: “all the news we hope to print”. we cannot realistically articulate a detailed far-off in the future vision. but we can clearly see what is wrong now. this can be our realistically grounded imaginary: the many problems being immediately solved let us begin articulating things that could be done, things just beyond the political realities of the moment, but nonetheless easily imagined. i have had so many conversations with ideology derived ignorant people about socialism. “well, if all property is going to be shared, does that mean somebody else will be allowed to use my toothbrush?”. or “ . . . just how exactly is it going to be organized for people to do their little bit of literary criticism in the afternoon?”. the conversation needs to be changed. john steinbeck articulated the direction of such a change in his classic novel the grapes of wrath: “what’s a red anyway?” “a red is somebody who, if you’re getting paid 15 cents an hour thinks you should get 25” “oh . . . i guess i’m a red then”. it is testimony to the power of such simplicity that when hollywood made their film of this novel they transformed this conversation. in answer to the question of what a red was the answer was given; “it’s hard to say. . . i really don’t know”. so instead of trying to present some detailed blueprint of the far-off future, let us give a series of questions and strong simple answers to people about the present and the immediate future . . . of what could be done. how can we eliminate hunger in the world? we can take the entire canadian wheat crop and offer to transport it free to where food is most urgently needed. could we afford to do this? yes, it would take an evenly distributed tax increase of only about 2% to afford to have canada save the world from starvation all by itself! how can we provide basic education and health care to the whole world’s population? well, we could commentary : imaginaries and realities, utopia and dystopia | 277 take half of bill gates’ money, and half of warren buffet’s money, and this special tax upon the two of them could alone easily finance the effort. the serious problems of poverty could be realistically costed. these costs could then be presented along with the estimates of individual wealth. yes, personalizing it would make a great difference. people seem to get lost when one talks about the top one percent of one percent. four hundred people in the us have a combined wealth greater than the wealth of half of the population of the us (johnston, 2011). people’s heads swim when one talks about the trillions of dollars spent on defense. we need to present to people what could be done for the price of a fleet of battleships or a single stealth fighter. we need to present to people that such and such changes in the national and international laws relevant to generic drugs would save exactly how many lives of people dying of aids or tb. i am not arguing for a single campaign. no, it needs to be bigger than that. the left, the world’s left, needs to continually present a vision of all the things that could be so quickly and easily done to make a better world. “a better world now” could be the new slogan arising from an unflinching look at the horror of dystopia. references bichlbaum, andy and bonanno, mike (2009). the yes men fix the world, renegade pictures uk . bourdieu, pierre (1988). homo academicus, california: stanford university press. caputo, john and vattimo, gianni (2009). after the death of god, pp. 124-125, quoted in slavoj zizek first as tragedy, then as farce, london: verso: pp. 78-79. demirbhas, ayhan, (2009). biohydrogen: for future engine fuel demands, springer press. frank, andre gunder (1966). “the development of underdevelopment” monthly review, volume 18. _____. (1967). capitalism and underdevelopment in latin america: historical studies of chile and brazil, monthly review press. garrett, laurie (1995). the coming plague: newly emerging diseases in a world out of balance, new york: penguin. johnson, dave (2011). “9 pictures that expose this country’s obscene division of wealth” alternet .org . http://bearmarketnews. blogspot.com/2011/02/9-pictures-that-expose-this-countrys.html kunstler, james howard (2005). the long emergency: surviving the converging catastrophes of the twenty-first century, grove atlantic. 278 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times paine, chris (writer/director) (2006). who killed the electric car? sony pictures classics. potter, garry (2010a). dystopia: what is to be done?, waterloo: new revolution press. ____. (2010b). dystopia: what is to be done? the film version–www. dystopiafilm.com. ____. (2010c). “power and knowledge: a dialectical contradiction”, journal of critical realism, equinox publishing. romm, joseph, j. (2005). the hype about hydrogen: fact and fiction in the race to save the climate, island press. ross, gary (director) (1998). pleasantville, new line cinema. sorkin, aaron (writer/director) (1999). “season one episode five” the west wing, nbc. turteltaub, jon (2006) jericho, cbs paramount network television. unattributed (2011). “hydrogen fuel vehicles looking at the disadvantages of hydrogen fuel vehicles” http://www.alternativeenergyresources.net/hydrogenfuelvehicles.html wallerstein, immanual (1974). the modern world-system i: capitalist agriculture and the origins of the european world-economy in the sixteenth century, academic press inc. wolff, richard (2011). “the keynesian revival: a marxian critique”, alternate routes, 22, 103-14 zizek, slavoj (2009). first as tragedy, then as farce, london: verso. 978-1-926958-01-9 167the ecological revolution making peace with the planet book review the ecological revolution making peace with the planet, by john bellamy foster. new york: monthly press review, 2009. $17.95 us., paper. isbn-13: 9781583671795. pages: 1-328. reviewed by: alda kokallaj1 john bellamy foster’s book is a critical treatise of the ecological crisis facing our planet and a scholarly contribution to the literature of political ecology. the book’s primary aim is to provide “resources for a journey of hope” towards an ecosocial revolution, while we stand at a crucial point regarding humanity’s relation to the earth. the book is divided in three parts. part one, entitled “the planetary crisis” begins by pointing out the ecological crisis that is looming upon the planet and briefly discusses the unsuccessful endeavors for addressing this crisis. particular attention has been paid to efforts undertaken as part of the 1992 rio earth summit and the johannesburg summit, which are seen as failed attempts to achieve a sustainable future. foster argues that sustainable development is increasingly seen as an opportunity for business, thus environmental reform is to be achieved through market-driven models. this part of the book reads easily and is rich in information about the inconsistencies that have lead to questionable environmental policies and the failure to achieve environmental reform on a large scale. in the second part entitled “marx’s ecology”, foster sets the ground for theorizing the ecological revolution. while its theoretical richness cannot be addressed here in its entirety, it is crucial to focus on the concept of ‘metabolic rift’. foster explains that instead of seeing marx’s work as blind towards nature, his work needs to be seen as providing a powerful analysis for the ecological crisis of our time. foster achieves this through an in-depth discussion of marx’s later work on political economy, especially by revealing his discussion of ‘the second agricultural revolu1 alda kokallaj is a ph.d candidate in the department of political science with a concentration in political economy. she can be reached at akokalla@connect.carleton.ca 168 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research tion’ and by unfolding marx’s inspiration with the work of german chemist justus von liebig (organic chemistry in its application to agriculture and physiology, 1840; animal chemistry, 1842; letters on modern agriculture, 1859). for foster, marx employed the concept of ‘metabolic rift’ in order to “capture the material estrangement of human beings in capitalist society from the natural conditions of their existence” (p.180). such discussion reveals that although marx did not attempt to provide a treatment of all ecological problems, his work was not ‘ecologically blind’. indeed, foster rightly maintains, that marx’s work “constitutes a possible starting point for a comprehensive sociology of the environment” (p.196). foster establishes that marx argued and wrote as if nature mattered, and that is the crux of his contribution to sociology as a field, as well as to the movements for an ecological revolution. the third part entitled “ecology and revolution”, presents an integration of theory with practice for establishing the argument that an ecological revolution needs to originate from ‘the social’ realm. thus, it is through a social revolution that secures the provision of basic human needs that an ecological civilization can be achieved. in this way foster maintains that the human relation to nature lies at the heart of the transition to socialism. this identification along with the discussion of the ‘metabolic rift’ found in marx’s work constitutes a significant contribution to socialist theory, which can serve as the starting point for the theorization of the transition from capitalism to socialism. this can also serve in understanding the struggles for sustainable society and human development that are taking place in the periphery of the capitalist system, which need to be seen as examples for fundamental change at the centre. in the last two chapters foster broadly discusses examples from cuba, venezuela, brazil and india as “islands of hope” for the establishment of the human metabolism with nature along with practices of human development, instead of solely economic development. although these are important cases for illustrating the transitional steps from capitalism to an ecological society, the discussion is somewhat insufficient. while expecting the argument for the ecological revolution to acquire more depth towards the end of the book, the reader encounters a rather romanticized and superficial treatment of the struggles for sustainable human development that have taken place in the periphery of the capitalist world system. one further problem with the book is that foster spends a lot of time trying to tie together theory and practice while dealing with some complicated theoretical questions and not-so-easy to sort out practical issues. this has resulted in often repetitive and overburdened sections, rather than providing more straightforward treatment of the practical and theoretical issues. better editing would have assisted the reader to get a clearer understanding of the dynamics of the socio-ecological 169 revolution presented in the book. this, coupled with the fact that the book is a collection of articles turned into chapters, demonstrates its lack of focus and at times makes it a difficult read. despite these problems foster’s book does offer an excellent discussion of some key concepts of marx’s work regarding the metabolism of humanity with nature and relates them to the problematique of eco-social sustainability. foster’s main achievement is to draw together a difficult body of theory with urging political questions and convincingly argue that it is high time ecological crises were addressed via a socialist, as opposed to a capitalist, approach. the root of addressing environmental crises for foster involves a “civilizational shift” that would be revolutionary for culture, economy and society. foster compellingly reveals that questions surrounding the capacity of the capitalist mode of production to wrought environmental destruction have been treated in the classical works of critical political economy. in this way, foster’s book is an important addition to the scholarly works, which assert that the work of marx, especially his later political economy, is characterized by an understanding that nature (non-human nature) matters. hence, the genesis of the questionable sustainability of capitalism can be discerned via marx’s discussion of ‘the second agricultural revolution’. another disciplinary contribution is for the field of sociology. through his discussion of marx, one of the classical thinkers of the field, and by unfolding the ‘metabolic rift’ as well as society – nature relation, foster reveals that theorization, particularly in environmental sociology, can be done on a more theoretically solid ground. more generally, from foster’s argument it can be discerned that in the face of ecological crises we need to think and act beyond disciplinary boundaries. he asserts that a “sociology of the environment” must recognize and consider changes that take place in the social and natural realms, as well as their mutual interaction. thus, social transformation cannot be understood without ecological transformation and vice versa. the ecological revolution making peace with the planet whole book pdf 296 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times book review economic democracy: the working class alternative to capitalism, by allan engler, halifax: fernwood publishing, 2010. $15.95 cad paper. isbn 9781552663462. pages 1-112. reviewed by: chris hurl1 in this world of highly specialized academic discourse, the art of writing a manifesto has all but disappeared. a good manifesto should be short, concise and all-encompassing. through sharp language it should cut to the core. in this sense, allan engler’s short book, economic democracy, should be seen as a contribution to the revival of the manifesto in confronting neoliberalism in canada and around the world. as a long-time activist in the labour movement, heading up local 400 of the international longshore and warehouse union (ilwu) and contributing to a strong left current in the vancouver and district labour council (vdlc), engler approaches the problems of modern capitalism as an organic intellectual. building on his earlier work, in which he examines the myth of market individualism, he diagnoses in clear language the many deep-seated problems inherent under capitalism and attempts to prescribe a solution, based on grassroots economic democracy. inspired by marx, engler situates modern capitalism in the disjuncture between the narrow restriction of property rights and the growing socialization of labour. on the one hand, ownership under capitalism is concentrated into the hands of an “entitled minority”. while this is often obfuscated through the apparent freedom of individuals to buy and sell things on the market, engler argues that market freedom is just another word for “letting the capitalists decide” (18). engler traces the implications of minority entitlement over the past three hundred years, which has entailed the destabilization of the world market, the destruction of the environment, the rise of colonial wars and the exploitation of peripheral regions by the core countries. on the other hand, people are increasingly interdependent, tied together in a complex division of labour. less and less capable of existing 1  chris hurl is a ph.d. candidate at the department of sociology and anthropology, carleton university (ottawa, canada). book review: economic democracy | 297 outside of market relations, they become dependent on social cooperation in order to survive. with the growing socialization of labour, the myth of competitive individualism becomes open to contestation as, increasingly, working people come to recognize that productivity cannot be simply attributed to the entrepreneurial spirit of individual capitalists, but is the outcome of complex relationships advanced between workers, communities, and nature. while engler goes some distance in diagnosing the problems of modern capitalism, he does not quite meet his mark. the key to writing a good manifesto is not only exposing the dark and dismal reality, but also evoking the collective protagonist that promises a way out, cobbling together a shared sensibility that transcends the relationship between author and reader. a good manifesto stands between voluntarism and determinism, such that the transformation envisioned is neither the result of the inevitable march of progress, nor is it simply a matter of waking people up out of false consciousness. on the one hand, the book falls short to the extent that it falls back on deterministic arguments. just like the transition from feudalism to capitalism, engler argues, the movement to a post-capitalist world will be a gradual one. it will not be produced through a revolutionary dictatorship or armed uprising. no single event will bring it about. in fact, the change will be incremental through the advancement of workplace organization, community mobilization and democratic political action. through slowly extending the power of social ownership, the powers of the “entitled minority” will be necessarily weakened. eventually, a “tipping point” will be reached and the system will be transformed as a whole. but how will the power of “social ownership” be advanced? at times this reads as an inevitable process. from the emergence of the early industrial unions through to the development of social security and the advancement of the rights of women and people of colour, engler’s account of twentieth century history appears as a ceaseless movement forward fuelled by the growing socialization of labour. however, barring a few comments on the deregulation of capital flows, he fails to sufficiently explain the significant shift in ruling relations over the last forty years. the rise of neoliberalism is simply attributed to the failure of trade union leaders and single-issue social activists to challenge the system as a whole. it is attributed to the lack of faith by the working class that a viable alternative to capitalism exists. missing from engler’s analysis is an in-depth discussion of “socialized labour,” which he defines as “people who depend on income from 298 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times their labour” (45). the rise of socialized labour is in part attributed to a process of primitive accumulation, by which people are dispossessed of their land and are compelled to sell their labour for a wage. it is fuelled by a process of technological innovation, through which people are integrated into an increasingly complex social machine. however, the notion of socialized labour is limited. to the extent that it includes everyone, this category lacks analytical power. it does not provide an adequate means of understanding the divisions in progressive social movements or the problem of building solidarity in the broader community. on the other hand, engler poses the solution as a matter of proper consciousness. it is simply a matter of showing people that a world of human equality, democracy and cooperation is practical and attainable. “once the scaffoldings of capitalist property relations have been removed, people will understand that well-being everywhere depends on human equality” (62). unfortunately, engler does not convincingly show how such a world is possible. instead, he falls back on the evocation of the hypothetical situation, that moment when revolution has been achieved, minority entitlement has been abolished and the community finally sits down to make its own decisions. the problem is that engler does not explain who or what this “community” is. this can, in part, be attributed to his latent populism. he tends to target forces external to the community that are responsible for its downfall. the “working class alternative” is purely negative, in the sense that it is simply contingent on denying minority entitlement. however, there is no sense of how this is a positive program. aside from a few hints of union organizing and social activism, there is no discussion of existing movements that are taking concrete steps towards a better world. in the absence of such a discussion, the advancement of alternatives is inevitably abstract and schematic. at times, engler appears as a makeshift fortune-teller, promising an end to war, environmental degradation and social inequality, viewing this more as a natural outcome than as a process that must be actively pursued through the adoption of specific strategies and tactics over the course of struggle. “socialized labour” and “community” are the two black-boxes that engler leaves unexplained. however, the book does take us in the direction of rethinking these terms and their relationship in practice. certainly, the rise of neoliberalism over the past forty years reflects the advancement of a fractured landscape upon which citizenship and wage labour have been unevenly inscribed. in this context, how can we effectively struggle to reconstitute the relationship between “work” book review: economic democracy | 299 and “citizenship” in a manner that undermines the market individualism that has been so prevalent over the past forty years? for instance, how does this play out on the ground through the struggles of public sector workers to retain their collective bargaining freedoms? or in the struggles of illegal immigrants to obtain the right to residence, gaining access to public schools and hospitals? in appraising the prefigurative possibilities of such struggles, it is not enough to simply invoke the universal protagonist that promises a way out. rather, it is important to recognize how these struggles come to develop concrete relationships with a broader community in practice. 252 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism book review canada and israel: building apartheid by yves engler. winnipeg: fernwood publishing, 2010. $15.95 can. isbn: 978-1-55266-355-4. pages: 1-168. reviewed by natalie spagnuolo1 canada’s policy towards israel constitutes a minefield of contentious issues which historians of canadian foreign relations seldom directly address. among the accounts that are most visible, few diverge from the nationalist narrative that represents canada as historically favouring peace-keeping over militarism. this positive portrait of canada, as suggested by paul heinbecker and bessma momani’s, compliments a somewhat more critical stance that imagines canada’s role as a less consequential, neutral player in middle east affairs.2 in canada and israel: building apartheid, engler problematizes the claims of current analysts, such the former canadian ambassador to israel michael bell,3 who would like to see greater canadian involvement in the middle east. engler takes issue with the perception of canada’s suitability as an “honest-broker” in the israel-palestine conflict. he argues that a consistently pro-israel attitude has characterized canada’s foreign policy towards the conflict from the nineteenth century onwards. perhaps no other study makes as strong a claim as engler does for historical consistency in terms of canadian complicity in the zionist expansion of jewish settlements. building on the foundation of leftwing revisionist readings of zionism as a form of colonialism, engler implicates canada in the controversial expansion of the state of israel and the current apartheid conditions by considering the domestic and international events that have supported these developments. following a tradition that traces canadian interest in the region back to the anti-semitic christian political 1 natalie spagnuolo completed an ma in history at carleton university. 2 heinbecker, p. and b. momani (eds.). canada and the middle east: in theory and practice. waterloo: wilfred laurier university. 3 bell, m., m. malloy, d. sultan and s. shaker. practitioner’ perspectives on canada-middle east relations. in heinbecker, p. and b. momani (eds.). canada and the middle east: in theory and practice (pp.7-24). waterloo: wilfred laurier university. canada and israel | 253 culture of the nineteenth century, the first chapter of this book attempts to develop a historical trend by assuming continuity between disparate time periods. engler represents the general tone of entire decades with single statements that demonstrate a “fortuitous political climate” for the federation of zionist societies of canada (p.13). considering the scope of the study, these leaps are likely made to allow engler to address the present-day consequences of canada’s support for israeli expansionism. nevertheless, his less-than-precise treatment of zionism conflates various versions of the movement and misleadingly overlooks participation by canadians in anti-expansionist zionist organizations, such as the union of progressive zionists (upz). engler’s larger point is that historically, canadian society has facilitated israel’s expansion by conjuring its own justifications for sustaining nationalist aggression, and not by simply borrowing the arguments of political zionists. through salient case studies, he highlights some of the advantages that canada has gained throughout various stages of its support for israeli expansionism, including such economic benefits as might result from the sale of weapons by canadian manufacturers to israeli buyers (p.10). a more thorough exposition of this thesis occurs in chapters 2, 3 and 4, which focus on the ways in which canadian policy has been influenced by broader international relations and a tendency to remain “preoccupied with the great powers,” namely britain and america (p.24). however, engler derives this trend from a reading of various media sources without comparing coverage of events, and this, along with his reliance on secondary sources that are often considered polemical, detracts from the credibility of this section. his humanitarian convictions and his motivation to mould his argument along these lines leads to a somewhat univocal interpretation of events. by not considering the subjectivity of his own accounts, engler consistently eschews the academic integrity necessary to persuade opponents of this perspective. these early chapters are balanced with a final section that is derived from a leftist, politically-conscious reading of present-day canada. more convincingly, chapters 5 and 6 document how canada’s supportive attitude for israel has been consistent with the activities of intelligence agencies, lobby groups, and major canadian corporations and charities. engler exposes aspects of canadian society that function to directly support israel’s expansion but which are, interestingly enough, unknown to most canadians, supporting the idea that “israel is highly dependent on north american financial, military, ideological and diplomatic support” 254 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism (p.145). key to engler’s claim is the connection he draws between the charitable status granted to israeli expansionist organizations in canada, such as the jewish national fund, and the support for canadian industries active in palestinian territory that falls beyond the green line. engler suggests the anti-semitic nature of explanations exaggerate the role of canada’s jewish communities. carefully distinguishing between anti-semitism and anti-zionism in chapter 9, he highlights the extensive efforts of anti-zionist jewish organizations and warns against the use of anti-semitism to discourage anti-zionist values (p.146). canadian complicity in israel is, according to engler, the outcome of a discourse that has developed while most canadians have been “shut-out of the discussion” (p.147). this political commentary is supplemented with engler’s own experience as a political activist. his skill in researching economic connections to foreign policy (see his black book of canadian foreign policy) lends this book greater weight as a counter-narrative, despite his failure to follow academic conventions. throughout canada and israel, engler insists that the relevancy of the current conflict in palestine and the suffering of palestinians must be defended based on canada’s role in that conflict and “canadian complicity with that suffering” (p.142). according to engler, failure to adequately defend the prioritization of this issue to canadians will not only sideline the problem but will risk insinuating anti-semitism (p.142). ingraining his argument in the thick fabric of controversy, engler’s book is a welcome contribution to the sparsely populated field of critical studies of canadian-israeli relations. alternate routes a critical review editorial board: jim conley, joan st. laurent, eileen saunders alternate routes is an annual publication of graduate students in sociology and anthropology. manuscripts, subscriptions and communications should be addressed to: alternate routes department of sociology and anthropology carleton university ottawa* ontario, canada k1s 5b6 phone: 231-6634. the editorial board wishes to establish a genuine forum for the exchange of ideas. we welcome critical responses, commentaries or rejoinders, which we will endeavour to publish in subsequent issues. the editors gratefully acknowledge the financial assistance of the department of sociology and anthropology, carleton univere is chairperson, dennis forcese. we also wish to thank cruikshank for her administrative assistance. subscriptions : individuals and institutions: $2. 75. payable to alternate routes. copyright 1979, alternate routes, unless otherwise noted. alternate routes a critical review editorial board: jim conley, joan st. laurent, eileen saunders alternate routes is an annual publication of graduate students in sociology and anthropology. manuscripts, subscriptions and communications should be addressed to: alternate routes department of sociology and anthropology carleton university ottawa, ontario, canada k1s 5b6 phone: 231-6634. the editorial board wishes to establish a genuine forum for the exchange of ideas. we welcome critical responses, commentaries or rejoinders, which we will endeavour to publish in subsequent issues. the editors gratefully acknowledge the financial assistance of the department of sociology and anthropology, carleton university, and its chairperson, dennis foroese. we also wish to thank bev cruikshank for her administrative assistance. subscriptions : individuals and institutions: $2. ?s. make cheques payable to alternate routes. copyright 1979, alternate routes, unless otherwise noted. digitized by the internet archive in 2011 with funding from carleton university, department of sociology & anthropology http://www.archive.org/details/alternateroutesc03alte alternate routes a critical review vol. 3 1979 contents phil heiple 7 university of california, santa barbara the poxitios of probability ...1 gordon haas / carleton university claus offe and the capitalist state: a critique ...25 bonnie ward / queen's university the myth of autonomy in family farm production . . .49 sut jhally / university of victoria marxism and underdevelopment: the modes of production debate ...63 janice belkaoui / rosary college a critical assessment of media studies ...94 votes to contributors ...128 editorial statement alternate routes is a critical review of sociology and related disciplines. we strive to publish the critical work of graduate students which will inform, and be of interest to students and teachers of social science. in our view, sociologists must be critical, both of their own society and of the work of other social analysts. we seek, therefore, to publish work which challenges existing sociological and societal orthodoxies. to achieve this goal we require manuscripts. we encourage graduate students among our readers to submit essays, reviews, commentaries and rejoinders on a wide variety of subjects. we particularly welcome v^rk which treats some aspect of canadian society within the wider concerns of critical social science. isbn 0-7709-0061-5 john porter 1921 1979 the editors of alternate routed wish to acknowledge the contributions of the late john porter to carleton university, to canadian sociology, and to the academic community at large. his seminal work, the vertical mosaic (1965j, stands as a benchmark in the development of sociological analyses of canadian society, serving to encourage the continuing investigation of the nature of social inequality. while beet known for this book, dr. porter was also the author of numerous other works, including canadian social structure: a statistical profile, amd does money matter? (co-authored with marion porter and bernard bliehen). john porter will be keenly missed, as a scholar, as a member of the university community, and above all, for graduate students at carleton, as a teacher committed to his students and to their training as critical, skilled sociologists . the politics of probability phil heiple "statistics" was first used in the middle of the sixteenth century and related to matters concerning the state. statistics continued in this sense for the next two hundred years. these matters of state concern became more and more numerical and summary methods were used. these provided a framework for social policy and also played a rhetorical function of legitimation due to popular attitudes toward exact figures (kendall, 1972:196; clark, 1937:122-124). by the mid-seventeenth century, mathematicians, physicists, astronomers and other scientists adopted and advanced the summary methods of statistics. these advances were aided by the developing systems of rational accounting in use in business and by the philosophies of natural science developed by galileo, bacon, descartes, and newton (clark, 1937:79, 133-137; kendall, 1972:197). quantification was first being attempted as a form of social thought at this time. the general background was the rational spirit of rising capitalism and the increasing size of different countries which necessitated a more impersonal and abstract basis for public administration. specific attempts were related to concrete problems of refining the numerical bases of the new insurance systems and to the mercantilists' belief that population size was a crucial factor in the wealth and power of the state (douglas, 1971a:50; lazarsfeld, 1961:279). new economic conditions forced the new importance of recordskeeping for political assessment. changing modes of production led to prolonged depression and massive unemployment throughout europe. vagrancy laws and institutionalized houses of confinement were among the bureaucratic responses to these conditions (c.f., chambliss, 1964; foucault, 1965). these required systematic records as well as agencies charged with the execution of these tasks. this was the beginnings of the bureaucracies of official morality. the growing size and complexity of western societies created a need for some form of accountable information which could be legally and morally sanctioned as the basis for policy judgments (douglas, 1971b :51-52). the symbiosis of quantitative social thought with the analytical and calculating form of thought of the bourgeoisie had advanced by the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries to the point where social statisticians and official statistics helped promote a formal standardization of morality as justice and helped civil service and state interventionist power to grow and to become increasingly remote from the qualitative relations of a socially produced and understood world. this is compatible with what weber depicted as the rationalizing character of bureaucratic thought, which lukacs later depicted as fundamental to the process of capitalist reification. parallel with the late-nineteenth century transition from entrepreneurial capitalism to corporate capitalism and the administrative welfare state of the new deal, sociology in the united states abandoned early descriptive participant-observer methods (e.g. chicago school) in favor of survey methods and the analysis of official statistics. by the 1930's, sociological methods as represented by the increasing number of methods texts came to be synonymous with quantitative analysis (douglas, 1971a:55). articles in social science journals from 1895 to the present reveal an increasing use of quantification and statistical manipulation. snizek (1975:42—424) found that these methods tended to produce " a realist view of social reality, often associated with the fallacy of reification, ... one that focuses on group properties in hopes of discovering the structural laws that govern behavior" (1975:416). statistical reasoning's claim to validity in social analysis is that the calculus of probability adequately describes the relative likelihood of events occurring in the social world. or, as blalock (1960:509) negatively stated it: if probabilities are unknown, it will be impossible to make legitimate use of statistical inference. i am interpreting this to mean that probability theory is the philosophical (i.e., metaphysical) link between statistical measurement and the world of observables. this dichotomy is interesting. blalock (1960:19) himself evokes it in an anticipatory aside where he says, "this is a question of fact which is irrelevant to the question of whether or not there is a legitimate unit of measurement." to me, the irrelevant is relevant. my basic thesis is that methods and politics are inseparable because methods for social analysis always contain certain presuppositions about the nature of the social world. insofar as these presuppositions express or imply a concept or evaluation of social order, or an excuse or means to evaluate social order, they are metaphysical. these metaphysics are a metaphysics of normality. they delimit the scope of normal social relations and are therefore political in their implications for social life. antonio gramsci 's criticism of the law of large numbers illustrates this approach. in brief, the law of large numbers states that the larger the number of samples the greater the likelihood (probability) that their average will approximate the average of the population from which they were drawn. several times in the prison notebooks gramsci (1971:401, 412) mentions the usefulness of this concept for analysing the quantitative expressions of social phenomena. this is acceptable because it does not pretend to avoid selecting for specific characteristics of the sample. when dealing with human subjects, however, gramsci (1971:428-429) finds the law of large numbers (and the concept of statistical law generally) to be deeply flawed: but the fact has not been properly emphasized that statistical laws can be employed in the science and art of politics only so long as the great masses of the population remain (or at least are reputed to remain) essentially passive, in relation to the questions which interest historians and politicians. furthermore, the extension of statistics to the science and art of politics can have very serious consequences to the extent that it is adopted for working out future perspectives and programmes of action ... indeed in politics the assumption of the law of statistics as an essential law operating of necessity is not only a scientific error, but becomes a practical error in action ... it should be observed that political action tends precisely to rouse the masses from passivity, in other words to destroy the law of large numbers. gramsci is arguing that the law of large numbers contains an important presupposition about its unit of analysis. the presupposition is that the unit of analysis is a passive object. gramsci points out that the unit of analysis cannot be an active subject. it cannot be in a state of becoming i.e. , it cannot be in a state that is undergoing any kind of qualitative change. this is the metaphysic of normality for the law of large numbers. it delimits its units to static relations. even if stochastic measures are used, only quantitative changes are possible. in short, it systematically ignores the possibility of a revolutionary subject. gramsci did not attempt a study of probability theory to see if metaphysics of normality were only accidentally and occasionally present, or generally so. in the next several pages i will survey probability theory with a search for metaphysics in mind. first, let me delineate which issues in probability theory i will be addressing. three perspectives dominate modern probability theory: the "objective" or "frequentist" position, the "subjective" or "personalist" approach, and the "logical" theory of probability. putting aside the logical theory for a moment, the distinction between the objective and subjective theories can be posed by their different accounts of the relationship between the concept of probability and the nature of probable knowledge. according to the objectivist position, probability is an objective characteristic of a multi-leveled physical reality. probable knowledge is knowledge of one of those levels and is incomplete because of the incompleteness of our information. strict determinacy is assumed in the physical reality. statistical methods are used to bridge the gap between insufficient information and the strict determinacy of objective reality. the objectivist position is the predominant form of probability theory used in the social sciences. the less widely held subjectivist position holds that our knowledge of physical reality is inevitably limited in principle and that our knowledge is therefore only probably true. this is the interpretation of probability' predominant in orthodox quantum physics: the quantum level is the level of inseparability between the knower and the object known where the knower is nonetheless compelled to speak of the object as if it were not affected by the knower, which results in statements of only probable validity. statistical methods are employed to express the degree of certitude the knower attaches to these statements (suppes, 1969:238-242). quantum theory is, in part, a theory of the indeterminateness of knowledge. no such theory exists in the social sciences, although, to me, its adoption there is long overdue. the logical theory of probability is not in use in the social sciences, unsuccessful attempts have been made to formulate social probability along the lines of the logical theory. basically, the logical theory of probability directly addresses the problem of metaphysical content. it tries to avoid metaphysics witn a strictly inductive non-demonstrative mathematical logic of self-evident maxims. in this it is hoped that all subjective judgments will be precluded. my basic thesis on probability is that it is in essence metaphysical and all attempts to remove the metaphysical content are doomed to fail. further, i will argue that it is precisely because of the metaphysical content that probability theory has been useful to quantitative social scientists. this usefulness is in large part a function of the degree to which the mataphysics of probability are compatible with the hegemonic ideologies of social science. i will try to illustrate this thesis with a few brief looks at the origins and development of the modern theory of probability. byrne (1968:292-293) provides the following thumbnail sketch of the development of the calculus of probability: in the course of time, cardano and then pascal and fermat came to recognize that gambler's rules already in existence might provide a more effective instrument with which to deal with the contingent. these gambler's rules they and then others developed and systematized. that this more or less systematic instrument of the nonsystematic came to be known as a calculus is due not only to its character as a mathematical instrument but to imitation and adulation of the great new instrument of the systematic, the calculus of leibnitz and newton ... ... the new instrument thus inaugurated was eventually systematized by laplace according to standards of his day. but it is important to bear in mind that what is now a demonstrative system in its own right began as an instrument to deal with the non-systematic on the basis of a new theory about how to express the non-systematic: not disjunctively but in terms of a continuum of values between what happens always and what never happens. the "notion of non-systematic" needs clarification. byrne (1968:285) writes: notion is here taken in a general sense broader than that of concept and is meant to imply, without further precision, awareness of or consciousness of. non-sys temat ic is also taken in a broad sense and is meant to imply non-necessity, or non-certain, or non-demonstrated, or even non-scientific in the thomlst sense which is not unrelated to the modern 'indeterminate'. being negative non-systematic is meant to imply also 'with respect to a given system. ' thereby what one calls non-systematic will depend on one's conception of a system. for example, if newtonian mechanics is taken to be the system, then the non-systematic will be all the relevant phenomena not explained by newtonian mechanics. this was, in fact, the original relation of the non-systematic: the first probabilists were trying to develop an instrument to handle specifically what was non-systematic with respect to the newtonian system of celestial mechanics. whereas the newtonian mechanics replaced medieval cosmology, the founders of proability theory sought to replace medieval disputational means of discerning the probability of judgments. the medieval concepts of probability as (1) probabilis : an argumentatively supported proposition, and (2) contingens : events that occur either ut in pluribus or ut in paucioribus were carried over into the new probability theory as (1) the logical interpretation: probability or degree of confirmation of a proposition, and (2) mathematical interpretation: probability or relative frequency of a class of variables (byrne, 1968:302). now let us take a look at the leading models and see what manifestations these concepts have once fully articulated. the logical theory of probability, as i mentioned earlier, is not in use in the social sciences, but it does indicate the culmination of a particular line of probabilistic thinking and is noteworthy in this respect. following a theme initiated by leibniz, attempts have been made to develop a general logic combining formal logic and the calculus of probability. john venn, c.s. peirce, richard von mises, hans reichenbach, and j.m. keynes all made contributions toward this project, and the work of rudolf carnap represents its most successful formulation (byrne , 1968:20-21; nagel, 1939:42-43). carnap distinguished between probability as (1) degree of confirmation, and (2) relative frequency over time. taking the former as his problematic, he says, "a definition of an explicandum for probability must not refer to any person and his beliefs but only to the two sentences and their logical properties within a given language system" (carnap, 1950:43; quoted in byrne, 1968:21). hence, a deliberate attempt is made to control opinionative (metaphysical) content. carnap 's approach to probability is part of his project to develop a wholly non-demonstrative inductive logic. the basic problem lies in consistently assigning numerical values to the degrees of confirmation for opinionative judgments. carnap believes that quantification is the only guarantor of this needed consistency (1950:220-226). as a general logic, all this could be constructed on the basis of elementary set theory, which carnap proceeds to do. however, the effectiveness of the construction is problematical. it is already disputable whether opinionative judgments about contingent events are in any sense quantitative and hence mathematically formalizable. carnap suggests that this issue is merely technical: if the logic can be constructed, then it will be effective (1950:242). yet, as byrne (1968:22) points out, that a formal logic can ever be capable of such a task is seriously challenged by two important theorems of meta-logic: craig's and godel's. craig's theorem is for replacing a formal linguistic system of theoretical terms with another with the same empirical content but no theoretical terms. nagel (1961:135-137) shows that this method of replacement becomes unworkable when the subject axioms (in this case opinionative judgments) are very numerousand that in order to specify, the replacement axioms the set of true statements about the subject axioms must be closed (i.e., known in advance). byrne (1968: 22-23) adds that opinionative judgments are at least numerous and in principle unlimited and that the very notion of opinionative judgments entails openness for the set of true statements about them. godel's theorem shows that formal axiomatic systems such as catnap's are necessarily incomplete in that proof of internal consistency (in this case, effectiveness) cannot be made within that system. instead, such proofs must come from without — a requirement that puts carnap' s entire project of a non-demonstrative inductive logic into serious question (nagel and newman, 1958:96-97). in sum, although the issue is not yet closed, there appear to be insurmountable 8 obstacles confronting a non-metaphysical logic of probability at levels both material (craig's theorem) and formal (gtidel's theorem). the mathematical theory of probability is like the logical theory of probability in that it can be constructed out of elementary set theory but would be subject to the critique of gbdel's theorem if metaphysical assumptions were not acknowledged. as with carnap's logical theory, the question being posed of the mathematical theory is not the adequacy of the formal system, but rather the interpretation of that system. while there are numerous ways that a mathematical theory of probability could be built upon the arithmetic of proper fractions (nagel, 1939:40-41), the linkages between the formal system and physical events would have to be drawn extra-mathematically. as venn (1962:87; quoted in byrne, 1968: 31) observes: when probability is ... divorced from direct reference to objects, as it substantially is by not being founded upon experience, it simply resolves itself into the common algebraical or arithmetical doctrine of permutations and combinations . emil borel and george polya suggest that the link is to be established by the practical certitude of the user. borel is distrustful of the opinion of a single individual, because it is too likely to be subjective. objective certitude arises through the common agreement of many prudent individuals. borel (quoted in byrne, 1968:18) states: the only reason why we regard as certain some well demonstrated mathematical facts ... is that the demonstrations have been reconsidered and verified by a large number of persons. it is fair to infer that these persons are assumed to be mathematicians, thus creating an elite consensus theory of truth (to which i will return in my examination of polanyi's views). it is also fair to make a strict logical rejection of this view on the grounds that it is tautological: borel seeks to justify practical applications of the mathematical theory of probability, which would include the law of large numbers, through reference to a practical situation in which the law of large numbers is 9 apparently assumed to be valid a priori. polya avoids the errors of carnap and borel by admitting that a formal system is neither selfjustifying nor connected to an observable reality in a non-mediated way. according to polya, we can, nonetheless, approach a formal system as if it were integrally connected to observable reality, insorfar as it is plausible to do so. polya (1954a: 198-199) outlines the grounds of plausibility: ... the credence that we place in a conjecture is bound to depend on our whole background , on the scientific atmosphere of our time ... in dealing with the observable reality, we can never arrive at any demonstrative truth, we have always to rely on some plausible ground. i think polya points in the right direction. why does probability theory have credibility as a deductive system? it has credibility only because it conforms to our background expectations about what a deductive system is like. why is there such confidence in the applicability of probability theory to social phenomena? because our background assumptions about the nature of social phenomena makes such application entirely plausible (though non-demonstrable). in this, polya is making tacit reference to what i have been calling a "metaphysics of normality." the only thing he has not done is put this into its historical and political context. i hope that the first part of this essay succeeded in establishing some of this context: (1) probability theory was adopted as a technique for use within the general method of quantitative social thought, wherein the conception of social phenomenon employed necessitated the assumptions that social reality had a pre-categorical facticity, that human behavior was quantifiable, and that these quantities had corresponding elements in number theory; and (2) this development was instrumental (a) to the rising bourgeoisie's interest in the rational planning of society through bureaucracies of official morality, and (b) to the ability to legitimate bourgeois rule through rhetorical reference to hard, numerical, quantitative science. in sura, 10 probability theory is plausibly applied to social phenomena because we have historically arrived at reified conceptions of what tocial phenomena are like and how to study them. of all the probabi lists surveyed thus far, some have acknowledged the presence of metaphysics in their conceptions of science and others have asserted its absence. of those who recognize the incompleteness or impossibility of logical and/or mathematical formulations of social probability without metaphysical presuppositions, none have tried to specify the use of metaphysics in this enterprise. micheal polanyi is an exception. polanyi provides a strong but ultimately circular critique of the myth of scientific objectivity. against the view of the relationship between science and its object as being impersonal and dispassionate, polanyi (1964) presents a wealth of evidence from the history of science to show that in all forms of knowing there is a tacit dimension which is ultimately more important than any established scientific method, evidence, or explanation. this dimension is the "personal participation of the knower in all acts of understanding" (1964:xiii). this participation is the effect of the opinions, prejudices, and preconceptions (i.e., metaphysics) of the knower upon the act of knowing. for the scientist, these would include "personal obligations to universal standards" (1964:17). with regards to probability, a probability statement is an incomplete and personal commitment according to one's framework of personal judgment (1964: 29). probability statements are thereby partially formalized within certain maxims understood to be no more than "rules of the art" (thus utilizing the strengths of an internally-consistent system without the weaknesses of extra-systemic truth claims) (1964 : 30-31) . polanyi recognizes that the scientist acts in dialogue with other scientists and with the traditions and norms of scientific practice, i.e., the social nature of science and, 11 hence, the social character of personal commitment. this means that a scientist's personal commitment to "universal standards" is influenced by factors outside the scientist. polanyi (1964:375) considers the influence on scientists to be "superior knowlege," which he defines, as "beside the systems of science and other factual truths, all that is coherently believed to be right and excellent by men within their culture." this "network of confidence" enables science to survive as a "coherent system of superior knowledge, upheld by people mutually recognizing each other as scientists, and acknowledged by modern society as its guide." full of post-enlightenment optimism, polanyi becomes a propagandist for a hegemonic elite technocracy. well aware of the horrors of stalinist and nazi scientism (1964:224-245), polanyi nonetheless opts for an elite consesus theory of truth. despite his sympathy for galileo, mesmer, d.c.miller, and other victim s of elite hegemony, nowhere does polanyi question the ability of the present scientific community to make the right decisions at the right times. he improves probability theory by including metaphysics in the creative act of probability assertion, but capitulates to bourgeois hegemony by not institutionalizing any means to critically reflect upon the metaphysics received. polya (1948: 208-209) recognizes this as a procedural necessity: "no idea is really bad, unless we are uncritical ... don't let your suspicion, or guess, or conjecture grow without examination till it becomes ineradicable. at any rate, in theoretical matters, the best of ideas is hurt by uncritical acceptance and thrives on critical examination." in contradistinction, polanyi is advocating what i warn against : technocratic planning by scientists uncritical of their own metaphysical presuppositions. some of the general problems of probability theory have been demonstrated. more difficulties arise when it is used in social science. this can be demonstrated by examining the ways it is used there. one way probability theory enters the methods of social research is 12 as an aid to sampling statistics. there it is used to ensure the selection of a representative sample. the problem it solves is the problem created by purposive sampling — maybe we can control for all extraneous variables we can anticipate, but what about extraneous variables ve have not anticipated? ford (1975:271) describes fisher's solution through probability sampling: his idea was to go about the whole business of casting for samples the other way around. if you can select imaginary variables to render them systematic, then, he reasoned, perhaps you can unselect the unimaginary ones to render them unsystematic. if you can be reasonably sure that their variation is indeed unsystematic from the point of view of your theory, then you can assume that any biases in your sample are also unsystematic, so these biases can be regarded as irrelevant from all conceivable points of view and thus can be ignored. the key to this is randomization. through randomization it is hoped that there will be no relevant differences between the sample and the universe from which it is drawn, and therefore any differences present are irrelevant. once you have a sample whose members were as equally likely to have been drawn as all those in the universe from which they came,, the calculus of probability may be employed to calculate the probability that your sample is biased in any relevant respect (ford, 1968:273). this is all well and good as long as one is dealing with experimental data hut, as selvin (1957) has pointed out, when non-experimental data are used certain problems arise. since the data are non-experimental, the researcher has no grounds for believing that there are no correlated biases greater than the random errors in the sample. these biases may have even an undetectable supressor effect. this rules out the calculus of probability (in this case, tests of significance). according to selvin (1957:522), "... only when all important correlated biases have been controlled is it legitimate to measure the possible influence of random errors by statistical tests of significance." of course, in order to control "all 13 important correlated biases" it is necessary to know what they are. this sounds to me like purposive sampling. if selvin is right, then probability sampling is randomly-collected purposive sampling with the assumption that there are no correlated biases greater than the random errors (a metaphysic of normality). while finding value in selvin, ford takes a different route to the same conclusion. she looks at the formal mathematics involved, specifically the requirement that "whenever the separate probability values of all mutually exclusive units are added together at the same time, che result must add up to 1" (1975:290). that this is impossible to link with events has been recognized in some statistical circles. in 1948 g.a. barnard criticized h. jeffreys' social statistics on this point (it is equally applicable to the school of r.a. fisher): the snag in professor jeffreys' theory is that to work it one has to specify a probability distribution for a class of alternative hypotheses and the whole of the probability has to be distributed. one must when interpreting one's experiments be able to think of all possible explanations of the data, and that, i think, none of us believe that we can do. it is always possible for someone to produce later an entirely new explanation we had never thought of, and which would not be represented in the hypothesis nor in the alternatives we had tested, (quoted in hogben, 1957:25.) ford (1975:291) sees this as a severe restriction of the applicability of probability statistics in general: for, unless the cases under consideration at any particular level of analysis may be properly regarded as derivable from a precisely defined and logically exhaustive set of nonoverlapping (i.e., mutually exclusive) units, then none of the impressive methods and techniques of probability theory will be applicable. the case against probability sampling is especially strong, for instead of solving the problems of purposive sampling, the formal requirements of the calculus of probability mean that they can only be employed "within a clearly defined set of units, that is, within a purposive sample" (ford, 1975:291, her emphasis). 14 an illustration of latent political bias is provided by an extension of neuberg's (1977:4-5, 20) critique of objectivist probability on the grounds of the unique character of a social event. he argues that social-level events (such as france becoming a monarchy) occur in a manner which cannot be recreated by replicating the circumstances. this is equally true for individual elements of a random sample. neuberg (1977:5) argues: the usual situation in a social-statistical study is a population model . . . the a priori assumption is that each element of the sample has been drawn at random, under similar circumstances, from the same population. if this assumption is not fulfilled the meaningfulness of the resulting explanation is open to question. one area, for example, where the assumption appears systematically doubtable is in .econometric time-series analysis. here the sample points are, originally, possibly distant from each other in social-level time. it is difficult to conceive a sense in which the elements of such a sample have been "drawn at random, under similar circumstances, from the same population". hence the uniqueness of social-level events is the basis of an explanation of the explanatory unreliability of econometric time-series models over longer periods of time. neuberg (1977:19-20) briefly notes that this may be because of the"special quality of soc.al-level («* historical) time" and cites lukacs' (.1971:89-90) argument that reified thought "degrades time to the dimension of space." in this way "time sheds its qualitative, variable, flowing nature; it freezes into an exactly delimited, quantifiable continuum filled with quantifiable 'things' ... in short, it becomes space." i would extend this argument somewhat to underscore the a priori assumption that social time is quantitative (newtonian). gurvitch (1964: 27-38) argues that social time is a conceptual derivative of a world-view and varies considerably within world-views according to need. husserl (1964:29, 77) argues that social time is wholly constituted by the experiential subject and that phenomenal time (e.g. standard time) has nothing more than an ascriptive status. both of these positions seriously challenge the assumption that time frames between unique events are comparable in any quantitative sense. this assumption has three additional features — the metaphysics of normality — which make the theorem politically 15 conservative : (1) the social subject cannot be an active participant in social time, either physically (e.g., intervening in such a way as to cause changes within the time frame) or cognitively (reflecting upon, interpreting, or reconstituting the experience of social time) ; (2) no part of the time frame can be anything other than a quantitative development of earlier parts (e.g., quantum leaps in time are precluded as well as any concept of determinism other than a linear causal model. the possibilities/probabilities for the future are wholly limited to quantitative developments of the present.) ; (3) if social time is viewed as newtonian space, then motive forces to change states woi.ld have to be extrinsic to the subjects at hand. this makes it possible for the subjects to be wholly quantifiable, i.e., for all behavior to be subsumed by and understood through number theory. to assume that social behavior can be subsumed by number theory is to believe that the limitations of numerical formulations do not apply to social analysis or social behavior. this metaphysics of normality is also the logical error of affirming the consequent because the second premise affirms the consequence of the hypothetical first premise. probability theory is only for the testing of judgments. it is when probability is seen as referring to material occurrence, i.t., events, that the confusion of causality and probability comes about. while i have no sympathy for any causal models in social research, probability in no way fits into a causal model. the concept of a probabilistic law is only possible when the unknown, a feature of judgments, is viewed as a material force in social events. this is one of the most common errors of bourgeois thought: to equate one's way of thinking about the world with the way things happen in the world (mistaking epistemology for ontology). in this way probability theory could be viewed as a source for social theory inductively drawn from frequency distributions (recall snizek's (1975) finding that mode of analysis determines theoretical perspective). logical grounds for rejecting inductively obtained explanations are given by hempel, who finds probabilistic laws to have nothing other than analogic credibility (1966:67). i think the most explicit dismissal of any connection between causal laws and probabilistic reasoning is provided by 16 polya (1954b; 100), who imagines a doctor trying to comfort a patient with the remark, "you have a very serious disease. of ten persons who get this disease, only one survives. but do not worry. it is lucky you came to me, for i have recently had nine patients with this disease and they all died of it." my final remark on probability theory as a method in social science deals with several small points made previously about the conflation of events with judgments and about the closed and unambiguous set of transformations available to probability. it has been suggested that graduate study in the social sciences is chiefly a process of indoctrination which occurs surreptitiously through the acquisition of a new language (pozzuto, 1975:20-21, 166-171). the notion that social probability is a language unto itself is plausible. in wittgenstein's view, language is a socially shared and practiced activity through which we learn and know what things are: "we predicate of the thing what lies in the method of representing it" (wittgenstein, 1953:46). that the truth claims of a language cannot be made within that language, but rather must be established through a richer language, is demonstrated by tarski (1944:341-376). what this means for the problem at hand is that if it is true that social probability is a language or like a language, then it constitutes a picture of the world whose validity cannot be established within its own logic. instead, validation must come from without, and i think i know where. consider the plausibility of the following experiment. go back in mnemonic time to your first indoctrination session into the secret meta-language of statistical probabilistic social analysis. remember all the examples about coins, dice, cards, and roulette wheels which made the case for the applicability of probability to social analysis so strong. those examples mystified us. the problem is that social-level events simply do not occur within 17 the same conditions necessary to say anything meaningful about the coins, dice, cards, and roulette wheels. in the case of the latter, it is not by chance that one knows the total distribution of probabilities, i.e., that a coin has two faces, that dice have six sides, and so on. in fact, the key concept of the latter is that everyone has full and complete knowledge of the total set of possibilities. it is in terms of this knowledge that meaningful frequencies can be calculated because everything relevant is known about them. the basic law of social statistics is that you must have a representative sample. powerful andeffective randomizing techniques are available to ensure this. but in ensuring representation, they also ensure that the parameters of the sample are unknown. nothing is known about the sample except that it is unknown and that anything discovered about it will be new data, i.e., everything relevant is unknown about it . this difference between dice, etc., and random samples, is irreducible and prevents transferability from one system to the next. nonetheless inductive leaps are frequently made between the two levels because of common sensical habits of mind, gramsci (1971:419) said that common sense is "the conception .of the world which is uncritically absorbed by the various social and cultural environments in which the moral individuality of the average (person) is developed," the inductive leap is facilely made because of the pre-ref lective habit of mind to think quantiatively and probabilistically about social events as a way of using human foresight in planning one's day. life u'ider capitalism predisposes people to pervasive habits of this sort in that every part of one's day can be fractured into discrete units, the manipulation of which is rarely reflectively regarded. the dominant ideas in social reasoning (commonsensical or quantitative-probabilistic) conform to the ideology of the ruling class. 18 in sum, probability theory is a logic, a language, a set theory, or a way of comraonsensical reasoning; the connection of which to social events can only be inductively (metaphysically) established. rather than making the link to the social world for statistical methods, probability theory is a stalking horse with which we can be ideological and confirm our commonsensical presuppositions about the social world while appearing to be scientific and anti-metaphysical. (perhaps the discipline selects for people who are predisposed to this sort of reasoning; just the fact that all these people at some time in their lives decided to go to graduate school indicates they are all gamblers to a certain extent). finally, i wish to conclude by returning to a point raised previously: the connection between quantitative social thought and the "analytical and calculating form of thought of the bourgeoisie." douglas (1971b ;58-59) believes that there are two major points of confluence : first, (bureaucratic rationality) contributed the view of men and their actions as absolute categories (or absolute typifications) . that is, rather than see men and their actions as the continuous, situation-bound, concrete persons we normally assume for our purposes of everyday interaction, it saw them as discrete, discontinuous phenomena that are independent of time and situations. it is this set of properties which is necessary before one can validly apply real numbers and mathematical analyses to human beings and their actions; it is this assumption that generates the pigeon-hole perspective on man known to all students of introductory methods in the social sciences ... second, this calculative attitude was fundamental to the development of the rational policy orientation of officials and rulers that made official information the means of 'testing' and 'proving' the effectiveness of official policies . . . the calculation of the effects of official action relative to the policy-determined practices (i.e. , effectiveness) was fundamental to the development of all official information. quantitative methods have a legitimating function. despite the undermining of the rhetorical claim to absolute rationality by twentieth century physical scientists themselves, mathematical formulations still evoke an ideology of absolute rationality in social science and the public 19 sphere (c,f. mumford, 1967). in this way, the official bureaucracies of social planning are invulnerable to any criticism that does not transcend quantitative reasoning, i.e., that does not reject the rhetorical appeal of mathematical formulations as absolute rationality. weber (1947:184-185) describes formal rationality as resting upon quantification and calculability . he views it as the mode of reasoning for modern science and industrial capitalism, especially in planning. without it, a capitalist economy could not be rationally (efficiently) administered (1958:26-27). in addition to being indispensable, it is absolutely unavoidable as the fate of the west and will pervade every apsect of social life from the administration of state bureaucracies to everyday life (1946:228-229). his scenario closes with a whole society completely rationalized by capitalism and experiencing "the absolute and complete dependence of its existence, of the political, technical and economic conditions of its life on a specially trained organization of officals" (1958:16). these ideas are very useful, but incomplete. lukacs (1971:99) expands upon weber (1946:228) to show that the members of the bureaucracy are themselves subject to rationalization and become dehumanized and mechanized as their service becomes a commodity form. schroyer (1973:184) adds that what weber calls formal rationalization is also the rising organic composition of capital, or in other words, increasing value production or growth of the capacity to create value. this is at the same time the growth of the capacity to extract surplus, i.e. material exploitation. developing themes inaugurated by kant, marx, weber and lukacs, are the recent observations of horkheimer (1947:8-9), mills (1959: 165-176), and kosik (1976:56-60) on the spread of irrationality simultaneous with and caused by advancing rationalization. rather than making individual everyday life more understandable and easier to control, rationalization 20 makes social reality more opaque and less subject to control — irrational in these senses. finally, buried within schlltz's social phenomenology is a theory of the invisibility of the expert. as experts become both more specialized and more important in the successful concentration of power in society (monopolization) t their role as constructors of world views and as corroborators of taken for granted social knowledge becomes "nearly completely invisible" (schlltz, and luckmann, 1973:315) and "entirely hidden in its anonymity" (schlltz, 1964:133). i think this is an important addition to marx's concept of reification as the domination of living human potentiality by dead, objectified labor (marx, 1969:17-18). what these additions do to weber's formulation is to turn it into a crisis theory. if this is a meaningful description of the tendencies associated with my subject, then the fundamental question to ask is what are the implications for our practical activity — as people trying to understand social reality (perhaps as critical social scientists) , and as people who have everyday lives in that social reality? there are partial answers to the first question. investigations need to be conducted into the available methodologies of social research to see (1) if they are in fact able to do what they are conceived to do, (2) if there are unacknowledged limitations on the picture of social reality they create, and (3) if these limitations have political consequences, particularly if bureaucracies of official planning are empowered to make social policy on the basis of their picture of social reality. for example, if the view of social reality is a reified one, then their policy will presuppose reification, and the "guns and butter" they impose will correspond best to the reified needs of society, and, hence, be materially constitutive of further societal reification (which is then studied and — lo and behold — confirms the presupposed reified picture 21 of social reality). my criticisms q f quantitative reasoning, statistics, and social probability can be summed up as a critique of reification. the details of the criticism can be included in lukacs' (1971:104, passim ) more general critique of reification in science for (1) losing contact with the totality by becoming a "formally closed system of partial laws", (2) ignoring the world-manufacturing effect of its work ("ontological problems of its own sphere of influence") , and (3) losing history through a freezing of the given to produce apodictically certain facts. although it is necessary to develop alternative methodologies, the answer is not a categorical rejection of quantitative methods. some of the techniques, like ordinal variables, probability sampling, probabilistic laws, and certain features of analysis, inference, and significance, must be cast on the junkheap forthwith. other techniques are not inappropriate in that they can be useful as long as one does not pretend that they are capable of dealing with anything other than appearances. what this means is that reified substitutes for real knowledge (quantified observables) are important and necessary means of apprehending and describing indicators of phenomena which as yet cannot be accounted for in any superior manner, as long as the reified status of the observables is acknowledged. this may seem like an overly simplistic solution but in practice it means an active struggle with the makers of social policy over the legitimacy of their research methods. this implies a struggle for social policy. this struggle (if the efforts of working peoples, the third world, and all others disenfranchised from the decision-making that effects them are unsuccessful) is a struggle for the future. if unsuccesful, there may be no basis for social policy other than the truncated visions of the technocrat. department <->f sociology, university of california, santa barbara. bibliography blalock, herbert m. social statistics , new york: mcgraw-hill. 1960 byrne, edmund f. 1968 carnap, rudolf. 1950 probability and opinion: a study in the medieval presuppositions of post-medieval theories of probability . the hague: martinus nijhoff. logical foundations of probability , chicago: university of chicago press. chambliss, william. "a sociological analysis of the law of vagrancy," 1964 social problems , 12, 1. clark, sir george, science and social welfare in the age of newton , 1937 oxford: clarendon. douglas, jack d. "the rhetoric of science and the origins of statistical 1971a social thought: the case of durkheira's suicide," in edward a. tiryakian (ed.) the phenomenon of sociology : a reader in the sociology of sociology, new york: appleton-century-crof ts . 1971b american social order: social rules in a pluralistic society, new york: macmillan. ford, julienne, paradigms and fairy tales: an introduction to the 1975 science of meanings. london: routledge & kegan paul. foucault, michael. madness and civilization , new york: pantheon. 1965 gramsci, antonio. selections form the prison notebooks , new york: 1971 international. gurvitch, georges. the spectrum of social time , dordrecht, holland :d.reidel 1964 hempel, carl g. philosophy of natural science , englewood cliffs, 1966 new jersey: prentice-hall. hogben, lancelot. statistical theory: the relationship of probability , 1957 horkheimer, max. 1947 husserl, edmund. 1964 kendall, m.g. 1972 credibility, and error , new york: w.w. norton. eclipse of reason , new york:seabury. the phenomenology of internal time consciousness, bloomington, ind.: indiana university press. "the history and future of statistics: in t.a. bancroft (ed.) statistical papers in honor of george w. snedecor , ames, iowa: iowa state university press. 23 lazarsfeld, paul f. "notes on the history of quantification in sociology 1961 trends, sources, and problems," isis, 52:2, lukacs, georg. 1971 marx, karl. 1969 (1863) history and class consciousness: studies in marxist dialectics , cambridge, mass.: mit resultate des unwittelbaren produktionsprozesses , franfurt: verlag neue kritik. mills, c. wright, 1959 the sociological imagination , new york: oxford university press. mumford, lewis, 1964 the pentagon of power ,' new york: harcourt-brace-jovanovich. 1967 "quality in the control of quantity," in s.v.ciriacwantrup and james j. parsons (eds.), natural resources: quality and quantity , berkeley, california university of california press. nagel, ernest. principles of the theory of probability , chicago: 1939 university of chicago press. 1961 the structure of science: problems in the logic of scientific explanation , new york: harcourt, brace & world. nagel, ernest and james r. newman. godel's proof , new york: new york 1960 university press. neubert.leland gerson. "the limits of statistics in planning analysis" 1977 polanyi, michael. 1964 quality and quantity , 11. personal knowledge: towards a post-critical philosophy , new york: harper & row. polya, george 1948 how to solve it , princeton, n.j.: princeton university press. 1954a induction and analogy in mathematics : volume one of mathematics and plausible reasoning , princeton, n.j. princeton unviersity press. 1954b patterns of plausible inference : volume two of mathematics and plausible reasoning , princeton, n.j. princeton unviersity press. pozzuto, richard. 1975 schroyer, trent. 1973 scientific sociology, alienation and community, phd dissertation, sociology department, university of oregon, eugene, oregon. the critique of domination: the origins and development of critical theory , new york: george braziller. 24 schutz, alfred. "the well-informed citizen: an essay on the social 1964 distribution of knowledge," in collected papers, volume ii, the hague: martinus nijhoff. schutz, alfred and thomas luckmann. structures of the life-world , 1973 evanston, illinois: northwestern university press. selvin, hanan c. "a critique of tests of significance in survey research,^ 1957 american sociological review , 22:4. snizek, william e. "the relationship between theory and research: 1975 a study in the sociology of sociology, sociological quarterly , 16:3. suppes, patrick. "the role of probability in quantum mechanics," 1969 in studies in the methodology and foundations of science , dordrecht, holland: d. reidel. tarski, alfred. "the semantic conception of truth and the foundations 1944 of semantics,: philosophy and phenoroenological research , 4. venn, john. 1962 logic of chance, new york: chelsea. weber, max. from max weber: essays in sociology , h.h. gerth and 1946' c. wright mills ceds.), new york: oxford university press 1947 the theor • of social and economic organization . new york: macmillan. 1958 the protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism, new york: scribners. wittgenstein, ludwig. philosophical investigations , new york:macmillan. 1953 25 carleton university symposium: braverman and beyond introduction by john myles in a period when the intellectual division of labour is intensifying, it is rare to find a work which is generally acclaimed as being "important", much less read, by social scientists representing a wide range of disciplines and specialties. such a work is harry braverman's labor and monopoly capital and it is for this reason that braverman's analysis of "the degradation of work in the twentieth century" was selected as the topic for a special symposium held at carleton university in the fall of 1977, a summary of which appears in the following pages. the centerpiece of the symposium was an address delivered by michael burawoy, assistant professor of sociology at the university of california, berkeley. it is reprinted in this volume under the title: "between marxist orthodoxy and critical theory: comments on braverman's labor and monopoly capital" . the paper presents in summary form the major points developed in a much longer manuscript made available to the participants beforehand. a subsequent revision which in manuscript form runs to 119 pages is forthcoming in politics and society (vol. 8, no. 4). in agreeing to prepare this paper for the symposium, burawoy accepted the difficult and challenging task of critiquing braverman from within the perspective of marxist analysis. the widespread acclaim with which braverman's work has been met makes this task all the more crucial. as with any great work, it stands in danger of being accepted as the last word on its subject matter, thereby becoming an impediment alternate routes rather than an impetus to further theoretical and empirical analysis. burawoy comes well qualified for his task. his discussion of braverman, which is mainly pitched at a theoretical level, is informed by his own experience and research in a chicago factory, the results of which are to appear in a forthcoming book entitled the production of consent on the shop floor, 1945 1975: the labor process under monopoly capitalism . perhaps more than any other contemporary work, braverman 's labor and monopoly capital reflects the vitality and relevance of the recent resurgence of marxist analysis in north american sociology. the seeds which braverman has planted, however, will wither and die unless nurtured in an atmosphere of intellectual struggle and debate. accordingly the participants in the symposium were deliberately encouraged to confront one another and avoid the unfortunate practice of avoiding points of disagreement which often passes for academic good manners and professional respect. as will be apparent, the discussants of burawoy 's paper fulfilled their mandate admirably. the most extensive replies came from leo panitch and donald swartz who, like burawoy, take their position from within the marxist perspective. john porter's comments, on the other hand, are probably representative of those sociologists who have been profoundly impressed by braverman 's work without accepting his marxist frame of reference. it is hoped that the presentation of the carleton debate in this issue of alternate routes will encourage more of the same elsewhere. 288 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times book review state power and democracy: before and after the presidency of george w. bush, by andrew kolin. new york, new york: palgrave macmillan, 2010. $85.00 u.s., paper. isbn: 978-0-230-10935-3. 262 pages. reviewed by: brandon tozzo1 did america under george w. bush become a police state? andrew kolin’s book traces the centralization of control in the presidency at the expense of congress and american democracy. kolin argues the extreme security measures taken during the bush administration are not unique in american history, but part of a longer trend to limit democratic institutions and curtail individual rights and freedoms. according to kolin, under the bush presidency america became a police state. the administration used measures to quell opposition through the usa patriot act, and tortured enemy combatants in military prisons. while kolin provides a compelling account of the immoral and–under american law–illegal policies before and during the presidency of george w. bush, the book makes a less persuasive argument that this led to the elimination of domestic american democracy. the first chapters provide a brief historical account of the consolidation of political power in the executive branch. starting in the 19th and early 20th century, the american government used the police to investigate political opponents, such as black rights groups, communists, and women’s rights advocates. with ascendancy of the united states after world war ii, this increased in scope with the formation of the federal bureau of investigations (fbi) and the central intelligence agency (cia). the external threat of the cold war and the conflict in vietnam led to the american executive using the cia and fbi to infringe on the legal rights of american citizens. though many facets of the police state started with nixon in order to repress protest, it has culminated with george w. bush’s response to the terrorist attacks of september 11th, 2001. the strongest part of the book is the evidence that the american executive is allowed free rein to conduct foreign policy. other domestic institutions and social forces such as congress, the media and the public 1  brandon tozzo is a ph. d. candidate in political economy at queen’s university (kingston, ontario, canada). book review: state power and democracy | 289 ignore or are indifferent to the extreme measures taken by american presidents dating back to richard nixon. among the most alarming recent abuses were the use of torture in guantanamo bay and the iraqi abu ghraib prison, and the policy of extraordinary rendition to kidnap foreign nationals. all the while, the presidency insulated itself from criminal liability and congressional oversight. kolin goes into great detail to outline the lack of accountability for the military and the cia when it carries out presidential orders, and the need for substantial changes in the way america conducts its foreign policy. moreover, kolin outlines how american institutions failed to limit the actions of the bush administration in fighting the war on terror, a problem that continues under president obama. however, kolin’s argument that the bush administration has instituted a police state in america is less persuasive. a significant issue is that several key concepts are left unclear throughout the book, such as ‘police state,’ ‘democracy’ and ‘mass democracy’. this is not necessarily problematic–terms and concepts can vary depending on time and location–but there needs more discussion why concepts shift throughout the book. since the definitions are vague, it often obscures their meaning. for example, there is no discussion of why mass democracy movements such as the black panthers and the socialist party are favourable to american democracy, while others such as the religious right and tea party are not, since they are both mass movements albeit with different agendas. also, there is little comparative historical analysis of police states. if the united states has developed into a police state under george w. bush, then some caparison between it and other obvious police states such as maoist china, stalinist russia, and north korea under kim ilsung would have strengthened the book’s analysis and provided a more explicit conceptual framework. more substantively, the bush administration’s elimination of american internal democracy and subversion of the constitution is less convincing when examining contemporary resistance movements in the united states. kolin argues the bush administration took radical measures to eliminate formal democracy in reaction to the september 11th terrorist attacks through the usa patriot act for warrantless wiretaps, and imprisoned and deported over 6000 muslim non-citizens. however many muslims detained after 9/11 returned to the united states and sued the bush administration for compensation. even some of the more controversial pieces of legislation –such as the warrantless wiretaps -have been struck down by the courts showing that formal democracy 290 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times may not have been entirely subverted. such legal recourse does not exist in guantanamo bay or in abu gharib. moreover, despite the actions of the bush presidency to limit dissent, there were mass social movements against the invasion of iraq and throughout his presidency. the book shows the bush administration did go too far restricting liberties in the war on terror against enemy combatants, but there was more domestic dissent than presented. many social groups and formal institutions such as activist groups, the courts, congress and the media combated the extremism of the bush presidency. so unlike foreign policy, domestic political forces in the united states had the ability –albeit with varying degrees of successto contest the extreme policies of the american president. kolin’s book is an effective warning to readers that the media, congress and the courts, and social forces must work to prevent the executive from abusing its power and control over america’s foreign policy. without the public forcing american institutions to keep watch, the president can commit illegal or immoral acts in the name of security. this book is recommended for those interested in a comprehensive, and thorough, overview of covert actions taken by the cia and fbi before and during the bush presidency, particularly in reaction to the september 11th terrorist attacks. 264 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism book review the devil’s milk: a social history of rubber, by john tully. new york, ny: monthly review press, 2011. $24.95 us. isbn: 987-1-58367-231-0. pages: 1-480. reviewed by james braun1 drawing upon marx’s famous formulation of commodity fetishism, john tully seeks to uncover “the whole buried world of social and ecological relations” that have historically constituted the production of rubber and its derivative products (p.359). rubber, tully argues, is an indispensable commodity for the industrial age, facilitating revolutions in transportation, sexuality and communications (p.41-45). its myriad industrial applications and unique properties meant that government and industry were prepared to go to great lengths to secure a reliable supply, abusing workers and ecologies in their wake. from the amazon rubber boom to the rise of synthetic rubber production in world war 2, tully documents the history of rubber production and processing “inextricably bound up with the rise of capitalism, imperialism and modernity” (p.345). although tully presents his book as “a social history of rubber,” his methodology focuses narrowly on labour history. from the subtitle, one might expect a comprehensive investigation of how rubber transformed everyday life from the viewpoint of “ordinary” people. the book hints at interesting directions such a history might proceed, but only ever briefly engages with them. the development of the rubber condom and its associated controversies suggests transformations in sexual and religious politics (p.44-45). likewise, the pneumatic tire had crucial implications for the ascendancy of truck transport over rails, but the political and social contests that facilitated this change are glossed over (p.139-40). the subjects of tully’s history are primarily workers, and their lives away from the worksite are not given much consideration. most of the book documents in detail the brutal labour practices that characterized (and continue to characterize) the rubber industry. wild rubber tapping in the amazon and the congo, driven by extortion and 1 james braun is an m.a. candidate at the institute of political economy, carleton university. he can be reached at jbraun@connect.carleton.ca. book review: the devil's milk | 265 sadism, was supplanted by hevea plantations and indentured labour in malaya, liberia and indochina, and ultimately synthetic production in world war 2 after japan captured most of the world’s natural rubber supply. his study of rubber production and processing begins with the early industrial revolution in britain, but is primarily focused on the birth and growth of the pneumatic tire industry in akron, ohio. despite rubber’s many applications, this is a reasonable limit on scope; as tully notes, by the end of world war 1, akron tire plants processed roughly forty percent of the world’s supply of raw rubber (p.138). his discussion of worker resistance is somewhat uneven. resistance tactics in akron, indochina and auschwitz are discussed at length, whereas one is left with the unlikely impression that indigenous workers in the congo and the amazon hardly fought against their oppression. the methodological challenges of writing history from the perspective of rubber tappers or plantation labourers are obvious; nevertheless, a social history should seek to highlight the agency of its subjects and to make visible the world as they understood it, not to merely paint them as the passive victims of forces from above. tully makes good use of tran tu binh’s memoir, a seminary-educated communist organizer who worked as a coolie “in order to carry out communist agitation among the michelin estate laborers” in indochina, but such first-hand accounts are exceedingly rare (p.239-40). innovative readings of other types of sources would shed a much-needed light on these hidden histories, a task crucial to tully’s project. among tully’s admirable achievements is to bridge the histories of colonial rubber extraction and metropolitan rubber processing. imperialism is a key theme of his work; at each stage in the rubber industry’s development, political and economic power intertwines transnationally to secure the rubber supply so vital to industrial modernity. among the more notable examples: british capital and peruvian desperation to assert sovereignty in the putomayo valley facilitated julio césar arana’s murderous rubber fiefdom (p.90-100). leopold ii of belgium’s instincts for political aggrandizement and financial enrichment coincide in his reign of terror in the congo (p.102-103). strikebreaking tactics developed by firestone in akron are used against plantation workers in malaya (p.273). ig farben’s collusion with the third reich creates legal complications for us efforts to develop synthetic rubber during the second world war, via farben’s agreements with standard oil (p.322-323). throughout this history, capital operates both as a productive and constraining force, both feeding the ravenous resource appetites of metropolitan industry and frustrating the efforts of those who would put a more “human face” on the labour processes involved. 266 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism given the importance of the colonized world in this book, there is space in his analysis to interrogate the coloniality of processes that brought rise to the rubber industry. the narrative he sketches in chapter one, of rubber as a mesoamerican article of ritual and curiosity transformed by european science and rationalism into a utilitarian commodity for industry, should be familiar to post-colonialists and other critics of modernity. the foundations of this rationalism have been thoroughly dissected, but tully does not engage with those critiques. rubber fetishism is described briefly as a cultural aberration on rubber’s march to utilitarian respectability, but could be used as an avenue to explore ongoing affective relationships to rubber (p.45-46). implicit in tully’s discussion of worker resistance in malaya is an acceptance of a normative, eurocentric conceptualization of economic organization. tully describes how trade unions and strikes emerged from “primitive protests” such as assaults on overseers and desertion, but he misses how this tactical evolution normalizes the relations of the capitalist wage economy imposed by european imperialism (p.260-270). in some respects, tully has done for rubber much of what sidney mintz did for sugar. in highlighting “the social character of the commodity of rubber,” (p.20) he demonstrates the crucial and brutal relationship between the metropolis and periphery that produces industrial capitalism. in other words, metropolitan machinery would not run without a steady stream of peripheral resources. 270 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism book review mexico’s revolution then and now by d. cockcroft. new york: monthly review press, 2010. $14.95 us, paper. isbn-13: 978-1-58367-224-2. pages: 1-160. reviewed by naomi alisa calnitsky1 in mexico’s revolution then and now, james cockcroft interrogates the parallels between the mexican revolution of 1910-17 and current political conflicts in mexico. he explores what persuasive ideas shaped and influenced revolutionary acts and the ways in which anarchist ideas and modes of thought were woven into revolutionary action. the author also attempts to provide a critical reassessment of continuities between early strands of revolutionary thought and those that persist, however embattled, in mexico today. in his first published book in 1968, intellectual precursors of the mexican revolution, 1900-1913, cockcroft explored the ideas which shaped revolution in mexico. mexico’s revolution then and now is a welcome addition to existing literature on mexican revolutionary ideology, relevant for its assessment of the ways in which revolutionary ideas have shaped contemporary resistance movements. cockcroft highlights magonistas’ influence upon the revolution, including their ideals of anarcho-communism and socialism. scholars such as john mason hart have explored the critical role played by ricardo flores magon as an organizer of a “pro-democracy movement” in mexico from the 1890’s through to 1910. hart’s emphasis upon the instrumental ideological work carried out by the partido liberal mexicano (p.l.m.) mirrors cockcroft’s assessments of the movement. cockcroft draws our attention to the “lessons and legacies” of the revolutionary period, illuminating present-day asymmetries and inequalities. in mexico, for example, the minimum wage remains the “weakest” across latin america. revolutionary struggles in contemporary mexico enrich the narrative, which intertwines past and present. cockcroft affords considerable attention the oaxacan-born revolutionary, ricardo flores magón, 1 naomi alisa calnitsky is a ph.d. candidate in the department of history at carleton university, ottawa. she received an ma in history from otago university in new zealand, where she specialized in pacific island seasonal migration to new zealand. her doctoral thesis research seeks to enhance the voices of mexican migrant workers in canadian labour history narratives. she currently lives in montreal, quebec. book review: mexico’s revolution then and now | 271 and the anti-imperialist mexican liberal party. in 1906 the p.l.m. disseminated an agenda for radical agrarian reform for communities dispossessed of lands and set out clauses to protect indigenous peoples. significantly, cockcroft weaves in the revolutionary contributions and sufferings experienced by magonista women (e.g. margarita ortega), redressing the paucity of historical attention devoted to mexican women involved with the magonista movement. cockcroft links revolutionary-era struggles to present-day labour conflict. the author emphasizes the magonistas’ goals of human emancipation and social justice and the role of the p.l.m. in co-ordinating a series of strikes prior to the revolution and the repression faced by those who joined its ranks. cockcroft flags persisting labour violations as key sites of contemporary struggle. of note are conflicts between working people’s rights and american, as well as transnational, companies based in mexico from anaconda copper at cananea to continental tire in el salto. the current political scene in mexico is assessed as wholly neoliberal and corrupt, poverty is viewed as generated (rather than worsened) by neoliberal policy, and mass emigrations and union-busting considered normalized features of mexican life. the militarization of the mexican border control, which increased under the obama administration, and consolidation of contemporary imperialism, particularly in oil, feature in cockcroft’s intrepid work. cultural items are treated in connection with the economy, including for instance, the dual monopoly over mexican television which operates under the “iron control” of two mexican billionaires. mexico’s uneven economic development is counterbalanced with the magonista era in which it was believed that the means of production were in need of a re-ordering. the revolution and its aftermath are deconstructed to their very core through a wholly economic analysis rooted in a social history approach. the ascent of the mexican bourgeoisie in the twentieth century is charted and the “institutional” revolution is exposed as counter-revolutionary, antagonistic to the interests of most mexicans. labour concerns remain at the heart of mexico’s revolution, then and now, which unearths contemporary popular uprisings against neoliberalism in the face of state-led, patriotic pacification campaigns that emphasized the “glorious revolution” and championed mexican identity through the celebration of public art. while the study does not go to great lengths to enrich our understanding of the revolutionary period, it does a fair job at emphasizing the ideological contributions made by magon and his followers. 272 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism cockcroft assesses the cárdenas administration as fraught with holes: during this time millions of hectares of land were transferred to peasants, yet best quality lands remained in the hands of twelve mostly foreign-owned corporations, enabling neolatifundismo to dominate mexican agriculture in ensuing decades. the abandonment of revolutionary ideals and political corruption are key themes. his immiseration thesis identifies n.a.f.t.a. as responsible for mexico’s dramatic loss of self-sufficiency in agriculture. neoliberal trading schemes are treated as naked imperialism. in spite of mexico retaining state-owned resources such as oil, pemex profits have not trickled down to the population and this state-owned company continues to fuel american consumption. as in mexico`s hope (1998), cockcroft is tuned into mexico’s most recent social conflicts. cockcroft believes that, while population growth does not create immiseration, in reality it has more to do with how capitalism operates. cockcroft credits injustices perpetuated upon the people to right-wing decision-making, and the book is concerned more with explaining current social ills facing the nation than with actually revisiting the revolutionary period. it emphasizes, for example, the high proportion of indigenous people and languages still present in mexico and the spread of neo-zapatismo from chiapas to other indigenous communities. resistance strategies are presented, for example the modern-day “sit-in” (plantón) of adelitos and adelitas advocating fair politics (actions taken by a female-led labour solidarity movement for maquiladora workers). modern attempts to reinstate political democracy are emphasized, including the neo-zapatistas who champion tierra y libertad (a magonista slogan) and continue to maintain autonomous “good government” municipalities. women`s issues are not ignored in this work. the author’s critiques of transnational capitalism’s inherently exploitative character refresh our understanding of current crises facing mexico, offering a relevant and necessary contribution and critical manifesto for change. perhaps lacking for not sufficiently engaging with the views of mexicans on their own revolutionary past and current predicament, cockcroft’s diligent and methodical work remains radical in nature and should be considered required reading for all those interested in gaining a better understanding of mexico today. alternate routes comments by donald swartz when the organizers of this symposium gave me a copy of michael burawoy's stimulating examination of braverman's labour and monopoly capital , i found myself in a quandary as to whether i was expected to address michael's paper or braverman's book. as the time allocated didn't permit me to do both, i have decided to focus on michael's paper as i found some of his arguments quite questionable. my remarks will concentrate on three of burawoy's assertions which are, i believe, central to his critique of braverman. firstly, burawoy argues that the separation of conception and execution is an outcome of the division of labour and the scientific-technical revolution whereas braverman sees it as a consequence of the application of taylorism. secondly, burawoy disputes braverman's view that it was with the development of monopoly capital that it was possible to institutionalize this separation. instead, burawoy advances the periodization of capitalist development which essentially sees taylorism in its failure, giving rise to a scientific and technical revolution. the third assertion, which i will address myself to quite briefly, is burawoy's claim that braverman's analysis is pessimistic, as "he takes for granted the capacity of capitalism to survive class struggles and dismisses them as ineffectual outbursts". burawoy refers us to chapter six, "the habituation of the worker", with the comment "his title mirrors its content". in brief, i'm not persuaded by burawoy's analysis. it is important to note that part of the confusion stems from a certain weakness 26 symposium on braverman in braverman 's treatment of taylorism, which burawoy correctly picks up on. (i'll elaborate on this point in the course of my remarks). in general burawoy' s argument seems based on the view that braverman has not paid proper attention to working-class struggles in the course of american history (and elsewhere, insofar as braverman is talking about the development of monopoly capital generally). specifically, burawoy's analysis rests heavily on worker resistance to taylcrism. burawoy defines taylorism as the specification of task performance. he notes that it certainly gives rise to a management conception of the labour process but precisely because labour power can not be physically separated from labour, workers' conceptual faculties remain. thus burawoy asserts that taylorism simply results in a management as well as a worker's conception of the labour process. effective worker resistance historically to management's attempts to specify task performance means that the separation of conception and execution cannot be identified with taylorism. secondly, building on braverman and marx's argument that technological change is an attempt to increase efficiency and hence surplus value in the face of competition, burawoy argues first that efficiency, not control, is management's prime motive. to equate the two is to assume that taylorism generates efficiency, management knows this, and management has the power to impose taylorism on the work force. burawoy disputes these three assumptions. then, adding that the impetus to technological change can also come from class struggle (i.e: successful wage claims which render labour saving machinery profitable), suggests that taylorism, by intensifying class struggles, spurred the technicalscientific revolution which led to monopoly capitalism. taylorism is to be seen not as the hand-maiden of monopoly capitalism as braverman 27 alternate routes suggests, but as its mid-wife. and of course, the separation of conception and execution is a tendential result of the scientifictechnical revolution and the division of labour. now, it is important not to deny the control that workers exercise both over the method of performing their tasks and the pace at which it is performed, but to see taylorism only as the specification of task performance as burawoy does, is to misconceive, i think, what taylorism and scientific management were all about. as brian palmer has noted, referring to the united states, as late as the progressive era capital still lacked decisive control over the basic processes of work. what this lack of control involved is illustrated very well in the study by katherine stone of steelmaking prior to the homestead strike of 1892, which is an example contrary to many of those cited by montgomery, where the workers were decisively defeated. (among progressive historians seeking to reinterpret u.s. labour history, i think there is probably a tendency to confuse substantial and sustained working class resistance with victory). in essence, prior to that strike, the employers of the steel mills contracted with the unions to produce steel on a rate per ton basis. the organization of the labour process, the division of labour, the pace, manpower requirements, recruitment, wage differentials and training, were determined by the unions virtually unilaterally. quality levels, tools and techniques were substantially controlled by the union as well, and i quote from stone's study: "changes for the improvement of the mill required the consent of mill committees". the ground capital has covered since then is reflected in the public amazement when the postal workers demand the right to veto technological change. the key point here is that the scientific-technical revolution, 28 symposium on braverman just like taylorism, had to confront the control of workers over the production process. taylorism was no mere technique for specifying tasks but an expression of capital's demand for the control labour then exercised over the execution of the labour process; a demand that control rest with its hirelings, not those from whom surplus value was to be extracted. management would assume the responsibility to conceptualize the entire work process, decompose it into constituent task elements each geared to the capacities of "a first-class man", select and train workers to perform these tasks, determine wage rates and differentials based upon task requirements and performance, and control the progress of workers from task to task. in general terms, i am advancing a much more dialectical view of the relationship between conception and execution, and implying that there was a lot of conscious purpose in management's activities and thinking at the time. let us not forget marx's distinction of the human labour process and the way in which animals go about producing on an instinctual basis "--what distinguishes the worst of architects from the best of bees is precisely that the architect conceptualizes his structure in his imagination before he realizes it concretely". it is very important not to get lost in specific scientific management techniques, many of which were as farcical as those peddled by human relations experts today. scientific management, as palmer notes, was part of a general thrust for efficiency, whose proponents despite differences in technique found common ground in the objectives of specialization, standardization and simplification. to these points of consensus it should also be added that job hierarchies, and individual piece-rates (where possible) were also widely advanced to promote competition and individualism. this vertical structure had nothing to 29 alternate routes do with mechanization per se, as burawoy in quoting lukacs seems to imply, but rather was seen as necessary to the realization of surplus value in the context of conflicting objective interests between capital and labour. in taylor's words of earning to bosses preferring rules of thumb to 'scientific management', "when employers herd the men together in classes, pay all of each class the same wages, the only remedy for the men comes in combination". this broader view of taylorism is suggestive of the relationship between it and monopoly capitalism more generally. its implementation meant the development of the management cadre, responsible for conceptualizing the production process, production planning and control, personnel, etc.; in short, a large administrative component. it presupposes a certain scale of production and degree of market control without which taking on the substantial investment is not likely to seem feasible. the significance of the magnitude of the investment is reflected in statistics in the united states which show that between 1899 and 1923, the administrative component of manufacturing industries doubled from less than 8% to 15% of all employees, a tremendous increase in overhead. what i'm suggesting is that the division of labour, taylorism, and the scientific-technical revolution are not easily separable and pcriodizable but rather form a very integrated unity. this idea is reinforced when we consider the specific relationship between the growth of monopoly capitalism and taylorism in the united states. kolko, in his study of the progressive era, points out that the bulk of the merger movement which generated monopoly capitalism, began in the late 1880's and peaked between 1897 and 1901. the date most commonly associated with the beginnings of the movement to establish industrial 30 symposium on bravennan management as a profession subject to scientific laws was 1903, when taylor addressed the american society of mechanical engineers. in other words, when one looks at the timing of the transformation of the structure of industry and one looks at the tremendous growth in all forms of 'scientific management' organizations etc., one sees a very close, indeed inseparable, linkage between the two processes. finally, it is important not to overlook the significance of scientific management as an instrument of the bourgeoisie's struggle for ideological hegemony, by undermining the working class's selfconception and its sense of its own worth, much of which was bound up in the image of the craftsmen. as palmer notes, "called into being by the structural imperatives of the developing industrial capitalism which required to refine the division of labour, 'efficiency' fulfilled another more specific function. in relegating the labouring man and the capitalist to their respective positions in the hierarchy, the new managers buried the populist conception of labour and took a long forceful stride in the direction of lessening working-class autonomy on the shop floor". in a sense (to use one of burawoy's concepts), the whole thrust for efficiency, including scientific management, was directed toward the process of obscuring surplus by suggesting that surplus came not from direct productive labour but rather from the skills and abilities of management. now let me briefly turn to the question of braverman's pessimism. i will confine my remarks to the now-infamous chapter six, whose title in my view does not at all mirror its content. braverman, to me, is talking about the post-taylor evolution in management thought and practices to some extent, which to quote braverman "do not by and large concern themselves with the organization of work but rather with the 31 alternate routes conditions under which the worker may be brought to co-operate in the scheme of work organized by the industrial engineer". braverman begins by overviewing the various subtle manifestations of working class resistance: absenteeism, output restriction, sabotage, as well as overt hostility to management (i.e. strikes). he is derisive in his treatment of management efforts to gain labours' co-operation. in his conclusion he directs our attention not to the apparent acclimatization of the working class but beneath it, to "the hostility of workers to the degenerated forms of work which are forced upon them... this hostility renews itself in new generations, expresses itself in the unbounded cynicism and revulsion which large numbers of workers feel about their work, and comes to the fore repeatedly as a social issue". if anything, such assertions promote optimism (and perhaps even adventurism) . conversely, it is burawoy rather than braverman whom i find pessimistic. his analysis of games of habituation which focusses particularly on surface adaptation of workers to capitalism, it seems to me, contradicts his shouting of class struggle from the rooftops in criticizing braverman. moreover, his conclusion too is pessimistic -in looking to contemporary theories of capitalist crisis and breakdown to jolt labour into revolutionary action. crisis and breakdown are no automatic economic event but presuppose the working class strong enough to counter bourgeois efforts to resolve the contradictions of capitalism at the expense of the working class. without addressing the question of how to build that strength, there will be no revolutionary crisis, but poverty, unemployment, and loss of freedom. and i think, in conclusion, the way to build upon braverman is to build upon the various manifestations of class struggle which are very obviously often individualized, localized, union as opposed to community or 32 symposium on braverman industry or more broadly class-based, and to try to build out of those manifestations an understanding of how to generalize them and how to broaden them into the kind of consciousness which will give the working class the capacity to create the political crisis which may lead us to a new era. -end -33 the collusion with patriarchy: a psychoanalytic account roberta hamilton this paper seeks an understanding within psychoanalytic theory for how people come to collude with patriarchal structures that oppress them. the bisexuality of the child, the distinction between basic and surplus repression and horowitz' analysis that surplus repression involves the repudiation of bisexuality is explored through the active and passive oedipal complexes . their 'normal' result involves monogamy , hetero sexuality and the denigration of femininity . the paper concludes that the struggles for sexual liberation belong at the centre of the struggle against capitalism and patriarchy . ttie most important insight that feminist theory and practice has given to traditional marxist theory is the insistence that the reproduction of the species, the institutions within which this occurs, and the entire network of relationships which result from it must be analysed if the nature of society is to be understood and transformed. within ma rx is tfeminist theory, this has led to the analysis of the role played by the family in perpetuating both the social relations of capitalism and patriarchy. while it is recognized, in the words of christopher lasch (1975) , that "the development of capitalism and the rise of the state reverberate in the individual's inner being,'' understanding the mediations for this interchange has proven an elusive task. it is not just marxists who have faltered in the attempt to understand why and how individuals collude with social and personal structures which exploit and oppress them, or for that matter why they resist, as miraculously they do, so often. it was dennis wrong who pointed out in his seminal article, "the cversocialized conception of man in modern sociology," that sociologists have tended to generate a view of man sufficiently "disembodied and non-materialistic to satisfy bishop berkeley, as well as being desexualized enough to please mrs. grundy" (1961:183-193). as a result, he argues, there has been a marked failure to keep in mind the long-time sociological and philosophical question: "how is it that man becomes tractable to social discipline?". he called for a sociological reassessment of the nature of man which would incorporate the findings of freud and psychoanalysis. and he did not have in mind the kind of truncated version of psychoanalysis that talcott etersons produced, extracting the concept of the superego from the rest of the theory to explain that men 42 internalise the values of their society. rather, wrong insisted that full weight be given to freud's understanding of the human psyche as a complex, conflict-ridden arena in which there is a life-long attempt to reconcile the desires of the material body with social possibilities. wiile mainstream sociology has, with few exceptions, resisted wrong's challenge, tending, as edward boldt pointed out, to return to symbolic interactionism and george herbert mead for an understanding of human motivation (1979:1-4), the particular intersection of questions posed by marxistfeminists are now leading to some tentative explorations of psychoanalytic theory, fl] what conjuncture of interests has brought this about? as eli zaretsky has put it (1976:133-34): marxists have rightly pointed out that society must organize the production of food, clothing and shelter, but they have forgotten that it must equally organize the sexual and instinctual life of its members and the process of human reproduction. this lacuna was, of course, particularly important to feminists whose primary concern with the hierarchical relationship between men and women, even in their intimate day-to-day encounters, led them to the appreciation expressed in the slogan, 'the personal is political.' the analysis that resulted from the marxist-feminist encounter led to the breakdown of the mystification that there were two autonomous arenas for human activity: the public world of work and social relations of production and the private world of the family and personal relations. [2] engel's (1948) understanding of the family as historically shaped by the particular mode of production has been extended to show the role of the family in capitalist society as both producer and reproducer of 'appropriate' kinds of labour power for capitalist enterprise and, also, as a unit of consumption for the products of that enterprise (zaretsky, 1976). the sexual division of labour, both in the 43 family and in the work world, has been analysed and used to help account for the perpetuation both of social relations of production and of patriarchy (armstrong and armstrong, 1978). ims work has, however, tended to rely upon superficial assumptions about human motivations. the collusion of men and women with the social structure has been variously accounted for by political and economic coercion, behavioural conformity and individual intention. it is not surprising that this inadequacy has been more acutely felt in marxistfeminist theory than in other theoretical perspectives. our interest in that intersection between social and economic structure and the behaviour of individuals has forced us to be peculiarly sensitive to individual resistance to change. we have had to wonder in new and bitter ways about the cliche, 'she is her own worst enemy. 1 kate millett's expression 'interior colonization' is an effective description but also raises questions about how and why. since our interest is not simply to understand the world but to change it, our theories are flawed if they do not include viable formulations about the nature of human beings. just as we need to understand the social structure in order to participate actively in its transformation, so we need to understand how the psychosexual structure of men and women will lead them to conform to, or to resist, the social order that they encounter. at the same time, the consequences of the transformations of social systems without the transformations of underlying psychosexual structure are becoming apparent. this, together with the lonaevity of capitalism and the tenacity of patriarchy, can lead us to unbecomingly cynical answers to the old questions, 'can men and women in fact live by bread alone, and under what circumstances will they demand more than that?' it has not been easy for feminists to turn to psychoanalysis. 44 freud's personal commitment to patriarchy was often reflected in his writings about women and have been an easy foil for feminist anger, f 3] this anger resonated with that of most marxists who believe that their theory is irreconcilable with freud. yet, as paul robinson (1969:3) argues, a serious controversy about the nature of freud's theories has long existed among the left: the question can be formulated in both political and sexual terms. did freud's theoretical achievement imply a revolutionary or a reactionary attitude toward the human situation? vvfes freud truly the apologist of sexual and political repression, drawing a picture of inevitable unhappiness, unfreedom, and aggression, or did his new science contain within it the promise of gratification, liberty and peace? in the last ten years or so, sparked by juliet mitchell's psychoanalysis and feminism (1974) , marxistfeminists have begun to draw out the radical implications of freud's theory as part of their attempt to show that patriarchy is not a universal but an historically specific phenomenon. [4] it is my own view that what we can have minimally from psychoanalytic theory are serious answers to questions about how and why women and men come to collude with the system of male dominance and female subordination and thereby participate in its perpetuation. it cannot explain why men are dominant and women subordinate. for that we must look elsewhere: to the implications of the unequal role men and women play in the perpetuation of the species and to the ramifications of the development of private property and social relations of production (hamilton, 1978: 104-05). here, i will argue that we internalise and legitimate this hierarchy in the course of the early development of our ego; that it becomes enmeshed in what we feel about or bodies, our behaviour and our actions, in our fantasies and dreams and in our self-concepts. in particular, in this paper i want to outline the specific kind 45 of contribution that i believe psychoanalytic theory can make: 1. it can account for, as freud put it (1965:116), how men and women are made in social terms and for how they are so tenaciously made. 2. it can account for the social reproduction of primarily heterosexual human beings out of bisexual human infants. 3. it can account for the social devaluation of what is perceived as femininity (with its more extreme manifestations in mysogyny) and the overvaluation of what is perceived as masculinity. the social reproduction of heterosexual men and women who place unequal value upon masculinity and femininity implies its corollary: that a whole range of needs, feelings, attitudes, desires and behaviours have had to be repressed in the process. [5] in other words, we have individuals who, in the course of their development, come to collude both with patriarchal and social structures. i would, of course, not argue that economic, political and social coercion do not play a crucial role in ensuring this conformity. i maintain, however, that the system does not, nor could not, rely simply on coercion to ensure that individuals perform the thousands of small and large acts which sustain it from day to day. lb start, "we must remember that in the beginning is the body" (wrong, 1961:183). radical feminists have had no difficulty with this departure. their concern has been with the social consequences of the biological differences between the sexes, differences which have made possible the reproduction of the species (firestone, 1970:12). the question arising from biological differences that has been posed most fruitfully within psychoanalysis is at what point, and in what ways, do these biological differences register themselves in the psychic development of the human child? before discussing this further, it is necessary to look briefly at freud's theory of ego development. qjr 46 interest is in that phase in the development of the ego (if indeed at all) that it becomes a gendered ego (wbllheim, 1975:65) . wiile marxists have had difficulty accepting the concept of repression, feminists have reacted negatively to the argument for penis envy. both these aspects of freud's theory have been the focus of new research, clarification, systematization and reformulation. the first concern is the link which freud drew between repression and civil ization. cn the surface at least, he advanced an image of the nature of man which is antithetical to marx's formulation. for marx, man's alienation from himself, from his fellows and from nature, is not an inevitable aspect of humanness but is historically specific, located in his alienation from the productive process and from the products of that process (marx, 1964:106-19). in an attempt to reconcile marx's theory with freud's concept of repression, herbert marcuse (1955), and more recently, gad horowitz (1977) have undertaken the task of analytically separating basic repression from vhat they call 'surplus repression.' vtiat is basic repression and vhy is it fundamental to the freudian account? under its rubric come many different processes. as horowitz says (1977:44-54), repression includes, for example, the physiological renunciation of certain infantile pleasures as the libido shifts to different areas of the body and sublimation, the process vhereby some neutralization and redirection of libido occurs (painting instead of smearing) . repression also explains the resolving of the oedipus complexes in which incestuous love objects are renounced and the subsequent identification with parental figures occurs. this neutralization, sublimation and substitution of desires occurs in the unconscious which operates according to its own laws and does not 47 recognize realities of time, space or 'logic.' the nature of the human child makes repression intrinsic to human development. on the one hand, she arrives on this earth dependent and helpless, unable to satisfy her bodily drives without the active intervention of caretakers. cn the other hand, unlike the young in the rest of the animal kingdom, she possesses no automatic script for the playing out of those drives. [6] what we have, therefore, is a small being alive with potential, but inevitable contradictions. she is not a tabula rasa , awaiting the imprint of her society. but, on the other hand, her dependence, helplessness and the very diffuseness of her drives means that she is unable to seek their gratification except insofar as they are being chanelled, fashioned, controlled, redirected and mediated by others. this process does not result only from the social pressures being exerted by the primary caretakers who engage in a "training" process. it is also very much a physiological process, in which the ego and the concept of the ego are developing in response to the body's sexual maturation. that is, the libido (the sexual instincts) successively organizes around four erotogenic zones, the mouth, anus, phallus and genitals. each stage does not simply replace the next but, in a dialectical fashion, the content of former stages persists in similar and altered forms within the new (wbllheim, 1975:64-65; horowitz, 1977:54). although with each successive stage, there is some repression of the wishes of earlier stages (it is unlikely even in the millenium that most adults would spend a lot of time sucking their thumbs) , marcuse and horowitz argue that, in our society, there is more repression at each stage than is called for by the requirements of ego development or civilization, (maybe thumbs would be better than cigarettes) . 48 repression is, then, our guarantee of humanness; in marcuse's words, (1955:38), it is that which enables the child "to transform the blind necessity of the fulfilment of want into desired gratification." but freud believed that the amount of renunciation necessary for civilization had become so intolerable that he could characterize man in society as discontented, even though man apart from society was a logical and practical absurdity. marcuse saw as his task, the rescuing of the idea of repression but without its devastating implications for man which freud foresaw. his solution was to separate repression into "basic" and "surplus" components. this was an analytic distinction only; for, in experience, they were intertwined. basic repression, necessary for civilization, is intrinsic to ego development and is not itself especially burdensome. surplus repression, which he posited, is by far the greater component, refers to renunciation in order that man accept patriarchal domination and toil. robinson (1969:232) refers to marcuse' s argument as follows: he was able to correlate the repression of pregenital sexuality with the economic needs of the capitalist order the requirement that libido be concentrated in the genitals in order that the rest of the body might be transformed into an instrument of labor. working with marcuse 1 s concepts, horowitz' contribution was to separate out what constitutes basic repression and what surplus repression. he has provided an analysis which explains the internalization of patriarchy and which has important implications for revolutionary feminism. horowitz' argument is that the main component of surplus repression involves the renunciation of all non-reproductive sexuality and therefore, primarily of bisexuality. in a society informed by scarcity, either actual or controlled, the libido will be free to pursue bodily pleasure insofar as it serves the perpetuation of 49 the species; i.e., heterosexual, genital sexuality. all other libidinal desires will be renounced and that energy will ultimately be redirected towards toil. this renunciation, firstly in the service of meeting human survival needs, but finally (and most evidently in capitalist society) in the service of the ruling class involves individual collusion with patriarchy. central to horowitz' critique is an analysis of the oedipus complexes and it is at this point that his analysis intersects with the concept of penis envy which, as i pointed out earlier, has been a particular 'problem' for feminists. freud posited the essential bisexuality of the human child (freud, 1965:116; wollheim, 1975:68). as the child proceeds through the first three stages of ego development (oral, anal, and phallic) she remains psychically bisexual. the biological differences between male and female do not yet register themselves psychically; for, the function of the dominant organ is experienced and represented in the same way in the two sexes (wollheim, 1975:68). it is, then, a psychically bisexual child wiich arrives at the oedipei stage. furthermore, for each sex, there is not one oedipus complex but two: the active and the passive. the resolution of these two oedipal dramas will determine the biological maturation of the child and its subsequent entry into 'human' society through the incorporation of the parents' social standards. when we consider the oedipus complex we can start with the assurance that for almost all children everywhere their first love object has been a female primary caretaker or caretakers. hi in our society, because of the nuclear family structure (fehich has taken its shape from, and in the course of, the development of capitalist social relations of production), it is likely to be one woman, the mother, who will carry out her mothering task in virtual so isolation from all other adults. v\hile a ma rx is tfeminist analysis has revealed the consequences of this for the hierarchical sex division of labour, the incorporation of a psychoanalytic account of ego development can demonstrate the manner in which children are prepared during their early psychosexual development for collusion with that structure. in other words, the renunciation of the oedipal complexes will also reflect the particular nature of the socializing society in our case, a patriarchal, heterosexual, sexually monogamous one, based on a sexual division of labour that the infant will have experienced profoundly through her primary caretaker, in all likelihood the female parent. under these circumstances, both sexes will emerge from the stage of pre-oedipal attachment and identification with the mother towards the inevitable mother-infant separation and the taking up of the mother as a love object. the father, because he distracts maternal attention from the child, is experienced as a rival. the male child fears that his father will do to him what he would like to do to his father; namely, castrate him. in such a struggle, the child acknowledges his powerlessness, represses his oedipal love for his mother, and compensates himself for his loss through identification with his father. this internalization of the father's standards forces part of the child's ego to split off into the observing and judging function viiich freud called the superego (1965:63-65) . this is the renunciation of the male child's active oedipus complex; "active" because active libidinal aims are called up in the desire to possess the mother. for the male child, however, the active aims are not forfeited, since he will one day have what his father now has. the vehicle for the incorporation of society's standards is, therefore castration anxiety. but, it is precisely this experience of castration anxiety which, horowitz argues si (95) , is felt much more intensely than it has to be because of the child's perception of the undoubted value of the penis, and what it represents in patriarchal society. the overvaluation (hyper-cathexis) of the penis in patriarchal society will also help determine the fate of the boy's passive oedipal complex. the male child will also take his father as love-object and see his mother as rival. when he realizes, however, that to desire his father means, in a patriarchal, heterosexual world, that he cannot have a penis, his desire for his father will arouse all the intense castration anxiety that was involved in his active oedipus complex. the 'normal' way to deal with this will be for him to repress not only his incestuous desire for his father in particular, but his homosexual desires in general, and therefore, his passive libidinal aims (including his desire to be penetrated) , for when roused they will summon up the anxiety surrounding castration (horowitz, 1977:95-103) . what he represses, then, are his passive aims which he equates with femininity since only females do not have a penis. these desires will be projected onto the female, who, as the possessor of those anxiety-creating desires, will be threatening (horowitz, 1977:108). she will have to be mastered or controlled and since this is an uncertain business, even in patriarchy hostility and contempt for women will also be summoned to aid in controlling his castration anxiety. the male repudiation of femininity, which ruth brunswick (1948:246) described as "what we have come to consider the normal male contempt for women," is an intrinsic feature of male psychosexual structure in patriarchal society. wbllheim (1975:68-69) puts it this way: "what women have suffered from over the centuries is man's inability to tolerate the feminine side of his nature." this, then, as 52 i understand it, would be, in skeletal form, the psychoanalytic case for male collusion with patriarchy. let us turn now to female children. like the little boy, the little girl will emerge from pre-oedipal attachment to her mother to the taking of her mother as her first love object. in freud's early formulations, the girl child passed directly from pre-oedipal attachment to her mother to the oedipal relationship with her father. he was, however, forced to reconsider (1965:119): we knew, of course, that there had been a preliminary stage of attachment to the mother, but we did not know that it could be so rich in content and so long-lasting, and could leave behind so many opportunities for fixations and dispositions. during this time the girl's father is only a troublesome rival: in some cases the attachment to her mother lasts beyond the fourth year of life. almost everything that we find later in her relation to her father was already present in this earlier attachment and has been transferred subsequently onto her father. more concisely put by brunswick (1948:236), "the pre-oedipal sexuality of the girl becomes her active oedipus complex with the mother as its object." the taking of the mother as love object will, however, be resolved in different ways by the male and female child. the little girl does experience her father as rival for her mother's attention, but this problem is soon eclipsed by a new dilemma. as she enters the genital phase she becomes aware of the significance of the fact that she does not have a penis and that a penis is what you need in a heterosexual world in order to possess your mother (horowitz, 1977:103). the resulting penis envy then has two sources: (1) the wish of the bisexual child to possess the organs of the other sex (penis envy, uterus envy, breast envy) , (horowitz, 104) and (2) the desire to do the things that having those organs permits one to do. lampl-de groot (1948:186) puts it this way: 53 the acceptance of castration anxiety has for her (the girlj the same consequences as for the boy. ' not only does her narcissism suffer a blow on account of her physical inferiority (the boy finds himself and his penis unbearably puny compared to his father; the girl finds her clitoris unimpressive compared to the larger and handier penis), but (secondly) she is forced to renounce the fulfilment of her first love longings. (just as the boy had to renounce his mother to avoid castration anxiety, the girl has to renounce her because, lacking a penis, she cannot possess her.) horowitz argues, however, that penis envy becomes intense penis envy, just as castration anxiety becomes intense castration anxiety for the male, because the phallo-centric civilization, the patriarchal, heterosexual world announces to the girl child that she cannot possess her mother, or indeed any other women, because she has no penis. she will be forced to repress not only her desire for her mother but also her homosexuality, in her case, her active libidinal aims. intense penis envy is for her then, just as castration anxiety is for the male, a repudiation of 'femininity.' but in her case, it is a repudiation of precisely what patriarchal civilization insists that she be feminine, i.e. passive and submissive. in this resolution of her active oedipal complex, she gives up her active libidinal aims. i have not yet dealt with the passive oedipal complex in which the girl takes her father as love object and experiences her mother as rival. by the time she turns to her father as love object, the girl child cannot be threatened by castration since, in the course of resolving her active oedipus complex, she has already accepted her 'castration,' and, more importantly, its implications (lampl de groot , 1948:186). as a result, she does not have the same motivation to renounce her father as love object. equally interesting, however, is why she takes him as a love object at all in a society in vrich he is not her primary caretaker. is it only, as freud suggested, in defensive flight from her active oedipal complex? "the girl is driven out of her 54 attachment to her mother through the influence of her envy for the penis and she enters the cedipus situation (with her father) as though into a haven of refuge" (1965:129). or is it, as nancy chodo row posits, (1978:160) , a question of seduction by her father? in other words, she responds to his treatment of her as a little girl. or is it, rather, a result of her 'essential' bisexual ity? wiile i would not deny the role of the first two processes, particularly in patriarchal society, i agree with horowitz that the acquisition of heterosexual genital aims by women (the acquisition of which is the species guarantee of survival; rape surely not being a viable alternative) cannot be an entirely learned behaviour (as chodorow seems to posit) and is rather one of the outcomes of the normal psychosexual development of a bisexual child (horowitz, 1977:115-116) . horowitz' aim is to show that the presence of these heterosexual genital aims is not incompatible with the retention both of pregenital sexuality and homosexuality. the male child need not give up his homosexuality and his passive aims and the girl child need not give up her homosexuality and her active aims, except in surplus repressive civilization (horowitz, 1977:106). the argument that both men and women repudiate femininity in the course of their early psychosexual development provides, i believe, a plausible explanation of the collusion of men and women with patriarchy. as v*>llheim (1975:97) argues, "psychoanalysis can at best explain why men and for that matter women have colluded", have conspired with the organization of society to secure male dominance and fer =1 e subordination. efert of this explanation demonstrates how both sexes come to repudiate their 'female' side, though only one sex is expected to live it. horowitz (1977:123) states categorically, "revolutionary 55 movements which do not revolutionize the psychosexual structure formed by surplus repression must fail, for this psychosexual structure is both product and source of domination." but if we are now trying to understand a world through such concepts as "basic" and "surplus" repression, are we in a realm that is not so much antithetical to marxist theory, as foreign to it? and if that is the case, how can we view the relationship between the dismantling of patriarchy and the overthrow of capitalism? at this point, i can only indicate where one important point of convergence would seem to lie. i would suggest that the concepts of objectification and alienation in marx have some affinity with the concepts of basic and surplus repression in marcuse and horowitz. psychoanalytic theory informs us that the young child's passage into human society involves an initial erotic dependence upon its primary caretakers, followed by the renunciation of that dependence and the internalization of the adults' socializing standards. this involves processes which horowitz describes as basic repression. intrinsic to this process, is the child's separation from her primary caretakers and, more especially, her growing realization that she is separate from the people and objects around her. in the course of ego development she moves from identification with the mother "briefly one may state that every successful act of identification with the mother makes the mother less necessary to the child" (brunswick, 1948:237) to objectification, the separation of the se! f from the other, the capacity to reflect upon oneself, that is to take oneself as object and to take the other as love object. this occurs in the very process in which she interacts with others and achieves growing mastery over her environment. compare marx (1964:113-114) who, we must remember, did not, like some of his 56 disciples, ever believe that consciousness started at the factory door: in creating a vvorld of objects by his practical activity, in his work upon organic nature, man proves himself a conscious species being, i.e. as a being that treats the species as its own essential being, or that treats itself as a species being .. .through and because of this production, nature appears as his work and his reality. the object of labor, is therefore, the objectif ication of man's species life: for he duplicates himself not only, as in consciousness, intellectually, but also actively, in reality, and therefore he contemplates himself [emphasis added] in a world that he has created. this activity in and upon the world commences with birth. we participate in the creation of our world even as we undergo its primary initiation rights. and this capacity for objectification is made possible through basic repression without which we could never experience separateness, without which we would never come to treat ourselves as the "actual living species" (marx, 1964:112). in our society, the human capacity of objectif ication turns against itself (marx, 1964:114): in tearing away from man the object of his production, therefore, estranged labor tears from him his species life , [emphasis added] his real objectivity as a member of the species and transforms his advantage over animals into the disadvantage that his inorganic body, nature, is taken away from him. in the very process of producing objects which will be controlled by others and used by others to enhance their life, man is alienated from his labour, the objects of his labour, himself and his fellows. his preparation for this has been lifelong, and his willingness is both the result and the cause of surplus repression, a surplus repression that has been fashioned by scarcity, real and controlled. for, in the course of renouncing many forms of bodily gratification, we renounce many pleasures to be found in our own company and in the company of others. this is true not just in directly sexual pleasures but in all the derivatives of sexuality including general sociability, affection 57 and in the activities arising from non-surplus repressive sublimation. we not only come to reflect upon ourselves, but also to experience a painful separation from self and from othersmarx's concept of alienation includes estrangement from self, other people and nature. its transcendence involves the reclamation of work and the productive process as the species activity of man. a psychoanalytic account informs us that our understanding of what constitutes 'work' must include all the activities in which we engage as we produce and reproduce our social world (williams, 1977:80, 91). its reclamation, therefore, must include the re-eroticization of the body, the retention of pregenital sexuality and the refusion of passive and active libidinal aims. such a perspective brings the struggles for sexual liberation away from the sidelines and into the centre of the struggle against capitalism and patriarchy. notes * an earlier draft of this paper was read at the annual meetings of the canadian sociology and anthropology association in saskatoon, june 1979. i would like to thank meg luxton (who was the discussant at that session) and, through her, heather jon m3roney, pat armstrong, john mcmillan and susan russell for their useful criticism of that draft. [1] mitchell, juliet; psychoanalysis and feminism , new york: pantheon books, 1974. there has been a debate in the new left review : richard wollheim (nlr 93 and 97), nancy chodorow and" eli zaretsky (nlr 96), the lacan study group (nlr 97). foreman, ann; femininity as alienation: women and the family in marxism and psychoanalysis , london: pluto press, 1977. chodorow, n=»ncy; the reproduction of mothering , university of california press, 1978. dinnerstein, dorothy, the mermaid and the minotaur . [2] morton, peggy, "women's work is never done," women unite toronto: women's educational press, 1972, pp. 46-68; smith, dorothy, "women, the family and corporate capitalism," women in canada , marylee stephenson, ed . general publishing co., 1977; hamilton, roberta, the liberation of women , london: allen and unwin, 1978. 58 [3] ada farber provides a thoughtful and sympathetic insight into freud's personal views on men and women through an analysis of his love letters to his fiance, martha bernays, in "freud's love letters: intimations of psychoanalytic theory," in the psychoanalytic review , vol. 65, no. 1, spring 1978, pp. 166-189. [4] see footnote 1. [5] it should be clear here, as throughout the paper, that i am talking only about the general case; the life history of any particular individual has its own specificity and requires its own analysis. it is equally important and interesting to investigate the conditions under which individuals depart from heterosexual ity and from societal concepts of masculinity and femininity but that is beyond the scope of this paper. [6] for example, the honey bee does not need to repress her desires in ordet for her to be willing to work until she dies of exhaustion. [7] nancy chodorow and ebrothy dinnerstein have both provided interesting accounts of the implications for human development of the universality of mothering as a gendered activity (footnote 1) . references armstrong, pat and hugh armstrong 1978 the double ghetto . mcclelland and stewart, toronto. boldt, edward d. 1979 "homo sociologicies" , society societe , 3, 1, pp. 1-4. brunswick, ruth 1948 "the preoedipal phase of the libido development", the psycho-analytic reader , robert fleiss (ed.), international universities press, new york. chodorow, nancy 1978 the reproduction of mothering . university of california press. engels, frederick 1948 the origin of the family, private property and the state . moscow: progress publishers. firestone, shulamath 1970 the dialectic of sex . new york: morrow. freud, slgmund 1965 new introductory lectures in psychoanalysis . new york: w.w. norton & co. 59 hamilton, roberta 1978 the liberation of women: a study of capitalism and patriarchy . london: george allen and unwin. horowitz, gad 1977 basic and surplus repression in psychoanalytic theory: freud , reich and marcuse . toronto: university of toronto press. lampl-de groot, j. 1948 "the evolution of the oedipus complex in women", in the psychoanalytic reader , robert fleiss (ed.) new york: international universities press. lasch, christopher 1975 "the family in history", new york review of books , november 13. marcuse, herbert 1955 eros and civilization . boston: beacon press. marx, karl 1964 the economic and philosophic manuscripts of 1844 . new york: international publishers. mitchell, juliet 1974 psychoanalysis and feminism . new york: pantheon books. robinson, paul a. 1969 the freudian left . new york: harper and row. williams, raymond 1977 marxism and literature . oxford university press. wrong, dennis 1961 "the oversocialized conception of man in modern sociology", american sociological review 26, pp. 183-93. zaretsky, eli 1976 capitalism, the family and personal life . new york: harper and row. 60 great recession-proof? shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism 2013 alternate routes edited by: carlo fanelli & bryan evans g reat r ecessio n-pro o f? carlo fanelli & b ryan evans great recession-proof? shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism 2013 alternate routes edited by: carlo fanelli & bryan evans g reat r ecessio n-pro o f? carlo fanelli & b ryan evans great recession-proof? shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism 2013 alternate routes edited by: carlo fanelli & bryan evans g reat r ecessio n-pro o f? carlo fanelli & b ryan evans © red quill books ltd. 2013 ottawa www.redquillbooks.com isbn 978-1-926958-24-8 printed on acid-free paper. the paper used in this book incorporates post-consumer waste and has not been sourced from endangered old growth forests, forests of exceptional conservation value or the amazon basin. red quill books subscribes to a one-book-at-a-time manufacturing process that substantially lessens supply chain waste, reduces greenhouse emissions, and conserves valuable natural resources. includes bibliographical references. isbn 978-1-926958-24-8 also published as a serial: “alternate routes” issn 1923-7081 (online) issn 0702-8865 (print) red quill books is an alternative publishing house. proceeds from the sale of this book will support future critical scholarship. alternate routes: a journal of critical social research volume 24, 2013 editors: carlo fanelli and bryan evans book review editors: priscillia lefebvre and nicolas carrier editorial board: nahla abdo, pat armstrong, david camfield, nicolas carrier, wallace clement, simten cosar, simon dalby, aaron doyle, ann duffy, bryan mitchell evans, luis fernandez, randall germain, peter gose, alan hunt, paul kellogg, jacqueline kennelly, mark neocleous, mi park, georgios papanicolaou, justin paulson, garry potter, stephanie ross, herman rosenfeld, george s. rigakos, heidi rimke, arne christoph ruckert, alan sears, mitu sengupta, donald swartz, ingo schmidt, toby sanger, janet lee siltanen, susan jane spronk, mark p. thomas, rosemary warskett. journal mandate established in 1977 at the department of sociology and anthropology, carleton university, alternate routes’ central mandate has been to create outlets for critical social research and interdisciplinary inquiry. a scholarly peer-reviewed annual, ar works closely with labour and social justice activists to promote the publication of non-traditional, provocative and radical analyses that may not find a forum in conventional academic venues. ar seeks to be a public academic journal and encourages submissions that advance or challenge theoretical, historical and contemporary socio-political, economic and cultural issues. in addition to full-length articles, we welcome review essays sparked by previously published material, interviews, short commentaries, as well as poetry, drawings and photos. ar publishes primarily special-themed issues and therefore requests that submissions be related to the current call for papers. submissions must be free of racist and sexist language, have limited technical or specialized terms and be written in a style that is accessible to our diverse readership. 4 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism table of contents | 5 table of contents introduction from great recession to great deception: reimagining the roots of the crisis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 —carlo fanelli and bryan evans articles 1. the myth of canadian exceptionalism: crisis, non-recovery, and austerity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 —jim stanford 2. crisis and opportunism: public finance trends from stimulus to austerity in canada . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 —christopher stoney and tamara krawchenko 3. canada’s conservative class war: using austerity to squeeze labour at the expense of economic growth. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59 —toby sanger 4. stabilizing privatization: crisis, enabling fields, and public-private partnerships in canada. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85 —heather whiteside 5. when resistance isn’t futile: understanding canadian labour’s fight for decent pensions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109 —joel davidson harden 6. what is trade union bureaucracy? a theoretical account . . . 133 —david camfield interventions 1. social property relations in the 21st century: an interview with ellen meiksins wood . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 159 —jordy cummings 2. twenty-first century socialism and the global financial meltdown: in conversation with michael lebowitz . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 171 —rebekah wetmore and ryan romard 3. neoliberalization and the matrix of action: in conversation with neil brenner, jamie peck, and nik theodore . . . . . . . . . 183 —peter brogan 6 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism 4. austerity is bad for our health: gender and distributional impacts of ontario’s 2012 budget . . . . . . . . . . . 199 —shelia block 5. austerity and aboriginal communities: an interview with david newhouse . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 207 —carlo fanelli 6. climate change and crisis: in dialogue with simon dalby . . . 215 —jen wrye 7. the electro-motive lockout and non-occupation: what did we lose? what can we learn? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 220 —herman rosenfeld 8. beyond the economic crisis: this crisis in trade unionism. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 236 —sam gindin reviews 1. christine pich —whitmore, elizabeth, et al. “activism that works.”. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 248 2. natalie spagnuolo —engler, yves. “canada and israel: building apartheid”. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 252 3. jillian l. curtin —toussaint, eric and damien millet. “debt, the imf and the world bank: sixty questions, sixty answers. . . 255 4. kevin partridge —hill, gord. “500 years of indigenous resistance.” . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 258 5. tiffany hall —frölich, paul. “rosa luxemburg: ideas in action.” 261 6. james braun —tully, john. “the devil’s milk: a social history of rubber.” . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 264 7. rebekah wetmore —brouwer, steve. “revolutionary doctors: how venezuela and cuba and changing the world’s conception of health care.” . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 267 8. naomi alisa calnitsky —cockcroft, james. “mexico’s revolution then and now.” . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 270 9. rania tfaily —ruben, albert. “the people’s lawyer.” . . . . . . . . . . 273 10. sabrina fernandes —dwyer, augusta. “broke but unbroken: grassroots social movements and their radical solutions to poverty.” . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 276 editorial introduction from great recession to great deception: reimagining the roots of the crisis —carlo fanelli and bryan evans on march 23, 2012, alternate routes in conjunction with carleton university and ryerson university’s centre for labour-management relations hosted the conference: the global economic crisis and canada: perception versus reality. the original call for papers which inspired the event and later this issue, stated: “it is now broadly recognized that the global economic crisis that struck in late 2007 is by far the most significant and wide-ranging since the depression years of the 1930s. while there have been signs of tepid recovery over the last five years, the international monetary fund (2011, p.xv) has recently warned that “[t]he global economy is in a dangerous new phase. global activity has weakened and become more uneven, confidence has fallen sharply recently, and downside risks are growing...thus, the structural problems facing recessionhit economies have proven more intractable than expected, and the process of devising and implementing reforms more complicated.” given fears of an ongoing recession, particularly as a result of europe’s sovereign debt crisis and a record level u.s. budget deficit, the global recession that struck in 2007 is by no means over. “in canada, however, the economic downturn has been shorter and milder than many of its g7 counterparts. in fact, according to statistics canada, while the canadian economy began contracting in the fourth quarter of 2008 by the third quarter of 2009 the recession had already passed. indeed, the great recession is allegedly no greater than previous slumps such as those in the early 1980s and 1990s as measured by job losses, home sales, bankruptcies, credit availability and consumer spending (cross, 2011). but numbers rarely, if ever, tell the whole story. federal, provincial and local governments across the country, regardless of political stripes, are turning to a range of austerity measures that will erode public services and the quality of public sector employment. it is also being demanded that private sector workers take pay and benefit cuts.” 8 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism despite official pronouncements suggesting a recovery is well underway, the articles and interviews collected here problematize prevailing characterizations of recession and recovery. rather than focusing on narrowly economistic measures, contributors challenge standard explanations of the great recession drawing attention to the multifaceted socio-political, ethno-racial and gendered dimensions of austerity and retrenchment. furthermore, instead of glossing over or ignoring the capitalist context that leaves workers dependent on the imperatives of capital, the analyses collected here take seriously the inherently antagonistic class relations that structure our daily lives. the challenge, as we saw it, was to bring together contributors who considered the uneven and often contradictory impacts of recession that stretch across the canadian political economic landscape. we are confident that the voices presented in this edition of ar have made a serious contribution to that objective. as the 2008 global economic slump made its way to canada, the initial response by the federal conservatives to a deteriorating economic climate was one of confusion and denial. in the midst of the 2008 general election p.m. harper suggested that there were some great buying opportunities in the stock market, while his finance minister, jim flaherty, insisted that canada would not run a deficit. six months later the deficit was estimated to be roughly $50 billion (laxer, 2009). despite dubious financial advice and eyebrow-raising budgetary forecasting, the conservatives have since gone on to win a majority government in 2011. like their counterparts across the provinces, most notably in ontario, alberta, and nova scotia —each province having elected a different political party —austerity and attacks against public services and unionized workers has been established as the orthodox policy response. needless to say, the shape taken by struggles over austerity and the protection of public services may well determine whether (neoliberal) capitalism continues uninterrupted or, alternatively, whether something new and historically unique can capture the public’s imagination. before introducing the articles presented here, however, we found it necessary to bring attention to what we are calling the great deception. it is plain to see that the assault on trade union rights and freedoms, the public provision of social services and working class standards of living are currently under attack and will remain so indefinitely.1 while austerity has been the buzzword of the last five years, when considered in historical perspective it is clear that 1 parts of this section are drawn from fanelli, 2012 editorial introduction from great recession to great deception | 9 canadians have been living with varying degrees of austerity for at least the last three decades (mcbride and shields, 1997; panitch and swartz, 2003). in this sense, public services and collective bargaining have been gradually eroded over an otherwise “permanent era of austerity” (evans and albo, 2010). the severity of the great recession has merely intensified and given impetus to long-term efforts to undermine the public production and delivery of public services and reduce workers’ ability to chart a path independent from the vagaries of capital. indeed, democracy in the workplace, understood as the ability of workers to have a say over how and what gets made, under what conditions and what rewards, are proving increasingly incompatible with the logic of capitalist development. since the 1980s, there has been a slow but steady downward convergence in working conditions and wages, backed by employer and state efforts to lower working class expectations. these efforts have been in combination with unprecedented amounts of personal affluence among certain groups in the midst of public sector austerity. . as the great recession recedes from public scrutiny in canada, its aftereffects continue to frame political debate and strain public finances. despite the public treasury bailing-out corporations, supplying new subsidies, lowering corporate taxes, and increasing state spending in order to counter the recession, the banks and capitalist classes continue to demand public sector austerity. emphasis has increasingly moved away from a critical investigation into the historical origins and root causes of the recession, excessive executive compensation, and even inquiries into the nature of capitalism to an emphasis on cutting public services and attacking those who produce, deliver and use those services, the poor, the elderly, and beyond. in our view, the redefinition of the crisis as stemming from a bloated and inefficient public sector and unionized workers’ wages more broadly, can be understood as nothing less than a great deception. this is not to imply that those who believe that the public sector is wasteful and unproductive are duped or foolish, nor to suggest that the public sector is uniformly a beacon of efficiency (since efficiency itself is a politically loaded phrase that often obscures more than it reveals), but to draw attention to the purposeful attempt to obfuscate, confuse, muddy, mislead and deflect critical inquiry away from a social and economic system —capitalism —that not only caused the crisis but constrains the scope for change. the essays collected here ensure that such a deception does not go unnoticed. 10 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism while greater detail is beyond the purview of this short editorial introduction and issue in its entirety, it is our contention that a new historical project that seeks to transcend (neoliberal) capitalism is urgently needed. a strong starting point for such a project —counter to the prevailing orthodoxy —is to expand the scope of the public sector. while the capitalist class bathed in excess in the midst of the crisis, politicians, the media and leading business pundits dogmatically asserted that workers must do more with less, that pensions, healthcare, unemployment insurance and social services were in need of modernization to better fit the new normal of declining working class incomes, increasingly ineffective collective bargaining, and global competition for investment. honest explanations as to why such social protections were no longer possible were few and far between. the fact that decades of cuts to high-income earners and corporations’ taxes had utterly failed to produce any real benefits for the majority of working people continued to elude the economic and political officialdom. quite paradoxically, decades of neoliberal reforms almost disappeared from the historical record as collective dementia (or deception) shifted the debate away from the origins and causes of the private sector-led great recession to a one-sided emphasis on the public sector. in our view, making the case for an expanded public sector necessarily entails the conversion of spaces formerly understood to be the sacrosanct domain of the private sector. nationalizing some parts of the economy, from the banking and finance sectors which sustain the institutional power of capital to the goods-producing sectors which create tangible outputs, may open up the possibility for escaping from the cycle of austerity and retrenchment which has long since characterized the body politic. democracy is never a fast-frozen state of being. rather democratic rights and freedoms are always a work in progress. expanding the terrain of the public sector via the democratization of finance and industry, carries the potential to deepen and extend such popular capacities, rights and freedoms. as marx (1875, n.p.) once put it, freedom consists in converting the state from being an organ of despotism superimposed upon society to one completely subordinate to it. thus an alternative class project from below must seek to extend the application of democratic forms out of the limited political sphere and into the organization of society as a whole. in a similar vein, marx also suggested that social reforms are never carried out by the weakness of the strong, but always by the strength of the weak (marx, 1847, n.p.). despite the setbacks to trade unionists and social editorial introduction from great recession to great deception | 11 justice activists over the period of neoliberalism, new political forms and organizational experiments are necessary in order to turn defeats into victory. all things considered, contrary to claims that the great recession is a thing of the past —as p.m. harper and finance minister flaherty are keen to remind —the articles assembled here collectively shatter the myth of canadian exceptionalism by showing that the aftershocks of the recession continue to have grave implications. starting us off, jim stanford debunks the notion that canada stands as a bastion of economic stability and superior economic management. rather, he demonstrates the shortcomings of conventional economic indicators arguing, contrary to mainstream analyses, that canada’s so-called recovery has been incomplete and relatively weak when compared with similar organization for economic cooperation and development countries. stoney and krawchencko follow with an overview of the transition from rescue strategies to exit strategies, that is, the shift from stimulus to austerity. they analyze where and how large changes in spending and restraint have taken place within the narrative of ‘crisis’ and the political opportunism that this has afforded. their analysis shows that rather than abandoning the neoliberal project, recent budgets, policies and priorities indicate a more intense and comprehensive neoliberal agenda is emerging in canada. moving forward, toby sanger argues that the acceleration of neoliberal-inspired austerity budgets will accomplish the same thing as previous recessions: lowering wage growth and shrinking the share of labour’s national income. focusing on the 2011 and 2012 federal conservative budgets, he makes the case that conventional economic approaches are incapable of adequately addressing contemporary needs, thus an alternative framework is gravely needed.the following article by heather whiteside explores the troubled track record of public-private-partnerships (p3s) in canada when delivering public infrastructure and services. her chapter investigates how recent projects in british columbia and ontario —“p3 enthusiasts” —have enabled privatization measures while disabling public oversight. the fifth article in this issue by joel harden details the canadian labour congress’ (clc) “retirement security for everyone” campaign. harden discusses how the clc grappled with the complexities of canada’s pension plan and the concrete challenges encountered along the way. despite some important shortcomings in the clc’s campaign, harden stresses the importance of expanding canada’s public pension plan in accordance with rebuilding the political capacities of organized 12 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism labour. the final article by david camfield problematizes the uncritical treatment of ‘trade union bureaucracy’ by academics and labour activists asking what do we mean when we talk about the trade union bureaucracy? in short, he argues that the sources of bureaucracy in unions lie in wage-labour contracts, the separation of conception from execution in human practical activity, the political administration of unions by state power, and the trade union officialdom. this year’s interventions section, which continues ar’s long-held emphasis on pushing the boundaries of academic orthodoxy, brings together some of the most original and innovative thinkers in a variety of sub-fields. in her wide-ranging and insightful interview, ellen meiksins wood discusses the similarities and differences of the current phase of austerity with past policy objectives; what is meant by “political marxism”; ongoing debates about the value of the term “imperialism”; the significance of the occupy movements and horizontalism; and the importance of freedom as a politically animating principle. the following interview with michael lebowitz explores the current crisis of world capitalism and its relation to canadian exceptionalism; the present state of the anti-capitalist left and its relation to party politics; the contradictions of ‘really-existing socialism’ and what socialistic responses to the recession might look like. in “neoliberalization and the matrix of action”, neil brenner, jamie peck and nick theodore take us through an examination of the different forms that neoliberalism has taken over the years; the urban dimensions of the crisis and the specific ways in which cities reproduce capital accumulation yet create openings for organized resistance to the ongoing encroachments of capital; the significance of the right to the city and occupy movements; and the importance of counter-hegemonic strategies and alternatives to capitalism. in the following commentary, shelia block considers the gender and distributional impacts of the 2012 ontario budget. she argues that reductions to services will have disproportionate impacts on low-income ontarians, and racialized and immigrant communities. furthermore, block shows how cutbacks in public sector employment will increase inequality and unemployment, in addition to expanding the share of unpaid caregiving work done primarily by women. an interview with david newhouse follows where he discusses the impacts of austerity on aboriginal communities. newhouse discusses issues related to housing and poverty reduction; health and education; mandatory minimum sentences and their impact on rehabilitative services; the relationship between first nations communities and social justice; and the continuing importance of first editorial introduction from great recession to great deception | 13 nations studies. in his valuable study of the electro-motive lockout, herman rosenfeld addresses the shortcomings and limitations of union tactics and strategy in fighting against concessionary demands from the caterpillar-owned plant. he asks why unions’ responses to concessionary demands have been so tepid and unwilling to demonstrate some of the confrontational tactics of the past? while rosenfeld is critical of the union’s non-occupation, he concludes that unions themselves are incapable of posing alternative industrial strategies that reject corporatism and dependence on progressive-sounding schemes for competitive private sector projects. instead, he argues that this requires a larger socialist and anti-capitalist movement —left of social democracy —that could research, debate and place a range of alternatives onto the larger political arena. the final article by sam gindin argues that the ‘crisis’ that desperately needs addressing is not just the economic crisis but the crisis inside the labour movement. he argues that working people have now been under concerted attack for some three decades, culminating in the austerity agenda presented as the ‘solution’ to the latest crisis. gindin reminds that the last time an economic and social crisis this deep occurred —the great depression of the 1930s —working people responded by reinventing forms of labour organization: placing industrial unionism firmly on the map and introducing dramatic new tactics like sit-downs and plant occupations. he asks: what comparable institutional and strategic changes might emerge from the present moment? rounding off ar’s thirty-sixth year of publication and twenty-fourth issue are ten book reviews which explore issues ranging from social movements and progressive activism to indigenous resistance, revolutionary health care and political theory. in including a broad survey of recently published material we hope that readers will find our reviews section useful. this issue of alternate routes would not have been possible without the tremendous support of carleton university’s departments of: sociology and anthropology; political science; law; geography and environmental studies; as well as, the institute of interdisciplinary studies; institute of political economy; and the faculty of graduate and postdoctoral affairs. we would also like to thank ryerson university’s department of politics and public administration and, in particular, the very generous support —financial, administrative and otherwise —of the centre for labour-management relations at the ted rogers school of management, and its director maurice maze14 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism rolle. thanks are also due to eric leclerc and hillary ryde collins for their valuable assistance. without the above-mentioned sources of support, this issue of ar would not have been possible. we look forward to what we hope is a long and fruitful relationship in the promotion of critical social research. last but certainly not least, a sincere thank you to all contributors and referees who took time out of their schedules to write, review, revise and re-evaluate the articles assembled here. your commitment to the most pressing issues of the day is a constant reminder of the importance of dissenting voices. for that we are grateful. in the year since the publication of ar’s 2011 issue, we are pleased to have added an online photo and video section which contains a series of presentations from past ar conferences.2 thanks are due to pance stojkovski for his tremendous assistance in editing 2012’s online conference presentations. we hope that readers and viewers will find them useful for stimulating class and other discussions. as a final note, all previously published material from 1977 to 2012 are now fully available on our website —www.alternateroutes. ca —free of charge. references cross, p. (2011). how did the 2008-10 recession and recovery compare to previous cycles. statistics canada. http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/11010-x/2011001/partpartie3-eng.htm evans, b. and g. albo. (2010). permanent austerity: the politics of the canadian exit strategy from fiscal stimulus. in fanelli, c. , c. hurl, p. lefebvre and g. ozcan (eds.), saving global capitalism: interrogating austerity and working class responses to crises (pp.7-28). ottawa: red quill books. fanelli, c. (forthcoming, 2012). fragile future. public services and collective bargaining in an era of austerity. unpublished doctoral dissertation. carleton university, ottawa, on. international monetary fund. (2011, september). world economic outlook: slowing growth, rising risks. http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/ weo/2011/02/pdf/text.pdf laxer, j. (2009). beyond the bubble: imagining a new canadian economy. toronto: between the lines. marx, k. (1847). the poverty of philosophy. http://www.marxists.org/archive/ marx/works/subject/hist-mat/pov-phil/ch02.htm 2 see http://www.alternateroutes.ca/index.php/ar/pages/view/video editorial introduction from great recession to great deception | 15 ———(1875). critique of the gotha programme. http://www.marxists.org/ archive/marx/works/1875/gotha/ mcbride, s. and j. shields. (1997). dismantling a nation: the transition to corporate rule in canada, second edition. halifax: fernwood publishing. panitch, l. & d. swartz. (2003). from consent to coercion: the assault on trade union freedoms. aurora, on: garamond press. a critical assessment of media studies janice monti belkaoui sociological theory has played an important role in the development of mass communications studies but until recently sociologists have not shown much commitment to media-related inquiries. the dismissal of mass media studies to the marginal areas of the sociological enterprise is unfortunate. sociology can make an important contribution in the codification of empirical findings about the media within its theoretical foundations. while this strategy has been advocated by both traditional and contemporary thinkers, from max weber to robert merton, few have made serious attempts at a synthesis of theory and media research, or, more precisely, at reconciling to some degree what is said about the media with what is known about its societal impact. this paper outlines some of the reasons for this hiatus, points out the existing but largely ignored links between sociological theory and media research, and concludes with a modest suggestion for the integration of media research within the paradigms of political sociology and stratification. i. what we say: conflicting conceptions of the development of mass media studies a. the nature of the critique of media studies mass media studies were among the principal irritants precipitating c. wright mills' charge that some brands of sociological inquiry are little more than sterile exercises in abstracted empiricism. in reviewing the many critiques of mass communications studies, a perennial theme is the allegation of theoretical and conceptual immaturity. one popular form of this attack argues that media researchers, especially the. north american variety, have spent their time refining sophisticated methodologies and statistical techniques while paying scant attention to the theoretical implications of their work. one recent assessment of american studies charges that the obsession with methods is "...symptomatic of a theoretical vacuum in which the paucity of ideas is masked by a dazzling display of empirical ingenuity" (golding and murdock, 1978) . this criticism is hardly of recent vintage. exactly two decades ago, berelson delivered what was regarded by many as a eulogy for media studies, charging among other things that the field was troubled '.ot so much by its paucity of theory than by a paucity of theorists. the state of communication research, in berelson* s play on words, was "withering away" as its founding fathers, men like hovland, lasswell, lazarsfeld and lewin, moved on to other areas (berelson, 1959) . the lack of a theoretical foundation has sometimes been attributed to the pragmatic research orientations of the discipline's pioneers. major determinants for the directions pursued by these early researchers included (1) the research monies offered by the u.s.'s infant broadcasting industry to map out its existing and potential audiences and (2) the pressing war-time demand by the u.s. military for propaganda studies. the administrative needs of these sponsors did much to set the agenda for the next three decades of communication research, 95 resulting finally in a preponderance of practically-oriented manipulation, effects and personal influence studies. while these efforts contain something of a theoretical base, especially at the level of social psychology, they are most often viewed as forming part of the areas of policy analysis or political science rather than sociology proper. in general, however, studies from this first generation of media research in the social sciences were concerned with the elaboration of quantitative techniques for the measurement of effects at the expense of theoretical formulations. (an account of this period and its implications for sociology can be found in gans , 1972) . the reputation of mass media studies has been discredited by the persistent charge of theoretical vacuity. the accusation has been made with such enthusiasm and frequency that seldom is the charge itself subject to evaluation. an overview of the sociological analysis of mass media suggests that the criticism is unduly severe. the history of the sociology of media does reveal at least implicit theoretical strains. they do not emerge sequentially nor do they reveal a linear progression of development but conform more to a multiple paradigmatic view of sociology, revealing a set of contending theoretical perspectives, or, perhaps more accurately, alternative conceptual frameworks, some of which are more fruitful than others. the study of media emerges not as an atheoretical activity but perhaps as one hindered by too much of it. what follows is a brief sketch of the most prominent of these perspectives. 96 b. sociological theory in the study of mass communications 1. early sociological approaches while an extensive analysis of the press and other forms of popular media did not assume a central role in the nineteenth and early twentieth century development of sociology, the media were at least acknowledged as a peculiar feature of modern and increasingly differentiated societies. for example, the nature and power of a modern and rationalized press attracted the attention of max weber, particularly the phenomenon of an increasingly bureaucratized process of newsgathering. that the questions and research program he proposed six decades ago still constitute a relatively unexplored area is an indication of the current state of underdevelopment in media sociology. specifically, weber was concerned with what gets "publicized" and what does not, corresponding to the quite recent work on the mechanisms of gatekeeping and agenda-setting. weber's interest in media ownership and control is even more indicative of his vision, especially when viewed in relation to recent critical queries into the monopolistic tendencies of media industries and the ways this translates into legitimating systems of ideology through media content. weber's media sociology focused on the ...power relations which create publicity, particularly the conditions of economic power... how does the press get its material? what is the position of the great news bureaus and how are they internationally related to each other? what is the position of the creative journalist in this intrinsically rationalized system of the modern press? (weber in mayer, 1946) 97 the media's role in achieving and maintaining cohesion in modern complex societies was given some attention in the early years of american sociology by members of the chicago school. the press was viewed as an emerging and necessary social institution for the integration of diverse immigrant groups and rural migrants into the mainstream of urban american life. this approach introduced the now familiar notion that, in modern industrial societies, mass media provide the lost sense of community associated with less industrial, villagebased social groupings. the concern with media displayed by the chicago school sociologists was to a large extent a byproduct of their broader based inquiries in human ecology and ethnic relations in community settings. because of this primary orientation, their writings on the press ever made much impact on media research nor did they elicit much response from the north american sociological community. 2. consensus theories the emergence of functionalism as the dominant paradigm in sociology by the mid-twentieth century has important implications for this generation of mass communications research. functionalism in postwar north america became a theory cum ideology of stable and egalitarian democracy. functionalist-inspired research focused on stabilizing and integrating relationships among society's institutions. in the form of pluralism, functionalist studies analyzed mechanisms of checks and balances among contending sources of power. functionalist 98 approaches also depict mass media as an information and entertainment organ, operating independently of society's interest groups. within this general framework, mass media are said to perform certain objective and systematic socialization and integration functions for the social system. most representative of this approach is the work of c.r. wright (1960; 1975) whose influential textbook on mass communication asserts that the "...transmission of culture focuses on the communication of information values and social norms from one generation to another" (wright , 1960:16). taking his cue from merton's reformulation of functionalism as a mode of analysis and middle range theoretical strategy, wright has provided his own reformulation of a general sociological framework for the analysis of mass media. this approach is built upon the following question: what are the intended and unintended functions and dysfunctions of mass communicated surveillance, correlation, cultural transmission and entertainment for society, subgroups, the individual and the cultural system? (1960) . despite the more critical intentions of this reformulation, media researchers who have adopted this perspective continue to focus on the role of media systems in promoting integration and consensus. in these renditions, media emerge more often as agents of socialization rather than of social control (e.g., janowitz, 1952; katz, et. al ., 1973; singer, 1975; allen, 1976). although the functionalist paradigm is no longer in its ascendancy, its application to empirical media research continues to have considerable impact. one specific approach which has attracted a number of adherents is a kind of synthesis of functionalism and behaviourism, 99 the "uses and gratifications" approach (see, e.g., the blumler and katz reader, 1975) . this literature tries to specify the links among the individual, media and society. an individual, in response to his sccial environment (determined by his social position, socialization, etc.), develops certain functional requisites or needs (for information, entertainment, contact, security, etc.) which are met by different varieties of media content. this basic paradigm has given rise to an entire catalogue of social effects and individual functions in a manner similar to the earlier lasswell-lazarsfeldmerton tradition. thus mass media are shown to provide information, advice, companionship, escape, entertainment and, implicitly, a core system of values. criticisms lodged against this approach reflect those which have been directed at functionalism in generalthe "uses and gratifications" literature has added little to our existing understanding of media's impact on society or individuals. the approach can be viewed as an extreme form of psychological reductionism because of the more or less explicit assumption that the explanations of media functions for total societies can be found in uncovering their functions for individuals. the approach has attempted to redefine "social effects" by starting with a rather problematic "given" an integrated, non-stratified, homeostatic society and then proceeds to question how the media have contributed to this result. the excessively descriptive bent inherent in the functionalist tradition has led some theorists to look for more general and 100 explanatory frameworks in the fields of information and systems theory. these perspectives still retain elements of structural-functionalism in that they tend to incorporate the notion of a social system, however defined, as the level of analysis. an assumption of equilibrium among system parts is also common to both approaches. information and systems theories of communication generally have met with more favour from communications specialists who view media vehicles primarily in technological terms than from media sociologists. the principal deficiency of such perspectives from the vantage point of theoretical sociology is their lack of attention to societal impact and change. 3. conflict theories the functionalist-based consensus model of society and media views mass communications vehicles as integrative mechanisms providing functional substitutes for traditional forms of order, cohesion and community. an alternative perspective, drawn from variants of elite, marxist and critical orientations, casts the mass media in the role of legitimating agents of social control in complex industrial societies. such approaches, until recently, have had less impact than the consensus model in media sociology. at the most general level, sociological conflict approaches view the emergence and current functions of mass communications as an historical outgrowth of the structuration of economic or power relations between dominant and subordinant social groups. in pluralist accounts of the rise of modern media systems, one focal point is the autonomy of privatelyowned media industries from state and political control. in contrast, 101 the conflict approaches not only acknowledge the importance of tracing the media's formal and informal links to authority but are also more centrally concerned with investigating the media as an agency of legitimation in relation to the structure and unequal distribution of social resources. in particular, this emphasis has prompted the elite or instrumentalist perspective's concern with the ideological implications of monopoly control over media industries. putting aside for the time being the results of empirical analyses of media ownership and control, at a purely theoretical level, proponents of the instrumentalist perspective view the modern media as the major ideological apparatus in the hands of the capitalist class. in miliband's framework (1969), for example, the media take on an instrumental role in western industrial socif^y. they are characterized not only by their "bourgeois" ideology, transmitted through advertising and program content, but also by monopoly control and by collusion of state and economic interests over management's decisions. western media systems, because of their organizational peculiarities, perform a crucial ideological function in perpetuating a global capitalist system. another variant of the conflict perspective comes out of the frankfurt school's critical theory tradition. while critical sociology rejects the notion that the institutional incorporation of the working class has been accomplished, it questions the role of media content and other forms of popular culture in creating and maintaining the working class's false consciousness. in this view, workers and large segments of the middle class are merely receivers and consumers 102 of media-sanctioned ideas and material goods. the media, under the control of capitalist interests, aim for the widest common denominator and are commercial rather than public-interest oriented. these traits, according to the frankfurt school's formulation, debase the audience and lower average levels of literacy and culture (see, e.g., adorno and horkheimer, 1977). in recent years, the frankfurt school, under the direction of habermas, has embraced a "self-liberating" ideology of praxis . this literature advocates the establishment of an alternative media system, open to expression of diverse opinions and cultures and operated independently of commercial pressures. the major point of contention between the critical theorists and the functionalists is that the former argue that changes in media systems should originate with interest groups outside the industry rather than from media professionals as advocated by the pluralists who largely embrace a "free press" and social responsibility model of media organization. one variant of nee—marxist sociology which quite recently has begun to apply a "theory of ideology" to the analysis of mass media draws its "theoretical base from german idealism, structuralism and semiotics. this "cultural studies" approach, as it is termed, places media systems and content in the context of culture as a whole. the key concept "culture" is vaguely defined as the set of relationships between a society's social order and the totality of symbolic forms through which meanings are transmitted (hall, 1977). within this broad conception of culture are placed not only the media but also art, literature, religion, non-verbal and verbal 103 interpersonal communication, clothing, and other expressions of lifer style. this approach begins with the assumption that all cultural items, in the form of media content and social artifacts, contain elements of the processes and ideologies inherent in their creation, which, when apprehended by the analyst, can serve as interpretive tools. mass media artifacts are viewed as "texts" and are analyzed by "reading off" their multiple levels of social meanings and placing these meanings in the general context of societal relations and organization. these descriptions of core assumptions and appropriate methods are vexingly vague and proponents of the cultural studies approach have written little in a less idiosyncratic vocabulary which might enlighten those outside the paradigm. this kind of interpretation is based on a naive leap of faith that makes an analogy between contemporary cultural products and class structure in capitalist society. stuart hall (1977) , the principal adherent to the cultural studies approach, borrows the concept of 'hegemony' from gramsci to convey a similar argument that cultural and media products are part of the ideological superstructure resting on society's economic base. hegemony represents an artificially imposed social order based on moral and intellectual justifications diffused throughout all classes to conceal domination and shape all aspects of social life. in hall's statement, hegemony is said to exist when the ruling class not only exercises the power to coerce but also wins the consent of the other classes. thus hegemony is created and maintained through both force and consent. in a liberal capitalist 104 state, consent is usually the predominant mode of hegemonic relations but it is said to operate as well behind an "armour of coercion". hegemony is therefore not simply an outcome of economic relations but involves the organization of superstructural relations in the state and polity and, in the form of ideological influence, in the mass media. the obvious issue which this approach is attached to but never directly addresses is the conditions under which superstructural relations, especially ideological domination through the media, are determined by class relations. the various proponents of this "theory of ideology" invoke but never go beyond marx's famous dictum that "the ideas of the ruling class are in every epoch the ruling ideas", never demonstrating how ideological domination by the capitalist class is created and sustained. this is not an explanation; rather it is a question to be investigated. at the empirical level, it is necessary to find evidence of how hegemoney is actually reproduced through the decisions of media personnel, through media content, and through consumer and political behaviour. interpretive analysis from cultural texts, no matter how ingenious or suggestive, are no substitute for this kind of systematic inquiry. another crucial problem in employing this approach in mass media studies is the irreconcilability of textual and empirical sociological methodologies. however tenuous one finds the above positions, they raise, in one form or another, the major issues in the contemporary critique of modern media. yet these positions do not yield much in the way of sociological insight, for devoid of an empirical base they tell us 105 nothing of the conditions under which the mass media have been organized, why the range of content offerings is so predictable, and what specific effects , if any, the media have on social structure. in isolation, without empirical substantiation, these positions have litte relevance as the foundations for an informed sociological theory of mass communications. they must be integrated into and assessed in terms of what is known about mass media in modern life. with that aim in mind, the following section will discuss the most prominent research areas in mass communications studies, the social effects tradition and the inquiries into media ownership and control, and, finally, the more recent linking of power and stratification studies with media analysis. ii . what we know; some major themes in the empirical tradition a. the context of evidence about media's societal impact the various theoretical approaches have all asserted in one form or another the power of the mass media over their audiences. the question now is whether this argument can be substantiated empirically. indeed, the findings while vast are also conflicting as a number of excellent summaries of social effects research reveals (see, e.g., mcquail, 1976; halloran, 1970; hovland, 1954; klapper, 1960). as a point of departure, it should be kept in mind that the assumption of media determinism has enjoyed a long historical primacy. long before scientific techniques were applied to questions of media's societal impact, it was generally taken as axiomatic that the emerging mass press and infant film and broadcast industries would be as 106 politically and socially powerful as any historical forms of persuasion. because of this widespread belief, the earliest research efforts on modern media's effects were formulated and conducted with high expectations of the media's impact which were not always borne out. this accounts for what mcquail observes as an evolving sequence of thinking "...in which the media have been viewed first as highly effective and irresistible, subsequently relatively powerless and latterly re-evaluated as having a. real potential for achieving effects" (mcquail, 1976:58). in fact, the post-war generation of media effects studies can be labelled the "no-effects" view. the lazarsfeld et. al. classic inquiry into the media and voting behaviour (1948) , for example, concluded that few people changed their opinions of candidates during an election and, rather than media coverage, discussion with others was the primary cause of this change. more recent studies of election campaigns are believed to confirm this view that the media, especially the press, make little impact on forming voting behaviour or instigating political change -(berelson, et. al. , 1954; lang and lang, 1959; 1968a, b) . klapper's influential summary of this first generation of effects literature modifies the finding of "no effects" to that of "partial effects", concluding that the media seldom convert or overtly manipulate audiences but certainly reinforce and confirm their existing opinions and beliefs. klapper's conclusion, while influential, has been misleadingly interpreted. reviewers have tended to overgeneralize media's indeterminancy and ignored the specific conditions 107 under which significant media effects can be isolated. in returning to this literature, it is possible to draw out a series of confirmed propositions about media effects which can lead to further inquiries. this cere body of findings, however suggestive, is in need of codification and considerable refinement. unfortunately the social effects tradition has often ignored the early foundation. consequently, contemporary research has not added neasureably to our understanding of media's societal impact. a good deal of the more recent research on press effectiveness falls within the same functionalist-behaviourist tradition discussed above and is subject to the same difficulties. the primary foci of the contemporary inquiries are personal influence and the media, political effects and the information and agenda-setting functions. although this research on press effects is extensive, some specific features of the press have been left unexplored. this approach because of its disinterest in content analysis and in questions of ownership and control largely ignores the partisan positions adopted by newspapers and broadcast stations and their impact on political behaviour. also, the role of non-news entertainment content in providing definitions of political situations has seldom been subjected to rigorous empirical scrutiny. the field seems stagnated by the narrow definition of political activity as "voting behaviour". only a few among the recent studies have examined the media's role in shaping definitions of broader political situations. al ] in all, the recent contributions to press effects research 108 seem to suggest that news media do play a significant role in shaping political behaviour. this is by no means the whole picture of media's societal impact nor does it indicate the state of effects research in general . sixty percent of all the studies dealing with media and human behaviour address the nature and effects of children's exposure to the entertainment content of television. most of these studies draw their theoretical foundations from the various modelling, social learning and interactionist perspectives. this body of literature has tried to establish a causal connection between television exposure and aggressive behaviour. taken as a whole, it is suggestive and may contribute to the erosion of the prevailing "no-effects conclusion on the issue of media and societal impact. however, the many inconsistencies in the literature cannot be overlooked. a variety of theoretical and methodological difficulties can be identified including design errors and unfounded or over-enthusiastic inferences from the individual to the societal level as well as researcher and experimenter bias. as it stands, the social effects research, whether it addresses political behaviour or the broad issues of socialization, has not resulted in an accumulation of knowledge about the societal impact of media content. the major deficiencies stem from methodological and theoretical oversights. first, the literature is flawed by a lack of clear definitions or by restricted definitions for key 109 variables. for example, political behaviour is most often conceptualized as party affiliation or voting behaviour, ignoring media portrayal of non-electoral but politically salient issues such as labour unrest, race relations, economic matters and so on. also, the research preoccupation with children and anti-social behaviour has done surprisingly little to clarify the operationalization of key terms like violent behaviour, aggression and heavy viewing. secondly, the relationship between media effects and stratification has not been adequately explored. again this is a direct result of mainstream sociology's neglect of mass communication research. further investigations are needed to determine the extent to which racial , cultural , sex and class differences are related to differences first in patterns of media exposure and second in social behavioural outcomes. another area of concern is the extent to which the socialization agents of family, school, workplace, peer groups, etc., affect the perception of media images, in news as well as entertainment content. more attention needs to be directed toward the extent of differential effectiveness of newspapers over broadcast media. finally, the social effects literature suffers from an extreme abstracted empiricism. despite the current theoretical emphasis on legitimation, integration, social control and the like in theoretical sociology, the social effects studies remain glued to the narrow concerns of voting and aggressive behaviour. the effects tradition provides us with the most striking example of the gap between theory and research in media analyses. 110 b. the context of evidence about onwership and control of media the inquiry into media ownership and control is possibly the one empirical tradition in mass media studies that is explictly related to a theoretical tradition in sociology. this tradition is within the confines of the sociology of power and stratification and tends to characterize the media's position of power in industrial societies in terms of pluralist or elite frameworks. in very recent years, a trend toward more explicitly marxist analyses can be traced (e.q., murdock and golding 1973; 1977) but relatively few empirical studies can rightly claim a marxist pedigree. when applied to mass media, the power and stratification frameworks shift the focus from the individual level of analysis of the behavioural effects tradition to a more macroscopic concern with the place of mass media in th" social structure, especially their role in the organization of social, political and economic relations. the pluralist approach posits the existence of socially responsible yet privately-owned and autonomous media industries. the argument is often suggested that the "free press" model does not imply freedom to be objective but simply freedom from any outside influence. in this most basic formulation, the model is closest to a pure laissezfaire interpretation of the function of the media. an autonomous media system sets up an open and competitive free market of ideas. the more diversity and competition among media vehicles, it is argued, the more likely the best and most accurate information and ideas will be the most widely assimilated and accepted. ill the interpretation based on elite theories rejects the pluralist assumptions of media responsibility and autonomy. instead, it posits that competing sets of elites attempt to legitimate their power through increasing concentration of control over society's major institutions, including mass media. indeed, the media are viewed as one of the most powerful tools for maintaining and legitimating the existing structure of social relations. although a problematic inferential leap is made from the analysis of elite control of media to the allegation of specific ideological consequences, the actual empirical inquiries in the elite tradition are usually concerned with the patterns of media ownership, whether economic and informal contacts link media personnel with government or other business elites (see, e.g., porter, 1965; clement, 1973; fournier, 1976; nixon, 1966; baer et. al. , 1974) . the pluralist and elite approaches have been applied to the empirical analysis of media ownership and control in several nations. much of the literature is flawed by the assumption that the organizational and economic contexts in which the media operate also imply broad ideological effects on the societal level. the empirical research reveals little relationship between concentration of ownership and media content slant, regardless of the economic and political organization of the nations under study. in the u.s., for example, the research disagrees over the extent of monopoly ownership as well as over the effect of concentration on the media professionals' social responsibility ethic. with regard to the issue of concentration, one student of this trend finds a tendency toward increasing monopolistic 112 control of the local daily press as well as increasing evidence of cross-media ownership (radio-tv-press) (nixon, 1955; nixon and hahn, 1971). little evidence is given, however, to establish the relationship between concentration and owner influence over content. in fact, one study reports little publisher interference under monopolistic conditions (bowers, 1967) . a recent report, in spite of its critical orientation, concluded that owner influence was probably more likely in small independent media since control over the content of chainowned media is usually less directly exercised (murphy, 1974) . a comprehensive review of the current state of knowledge on the relationship between concentration of ownership of american media and content finds almost no evidence of owner influence over the coverage of issues or editorial slant nor any difference between competitive and monopoloy media sectors. in fact, among the u.s. studies, the only evidence of the existence of hegemonic control is stempel's observation that residents in media monopoly towns are less well informed than residents in media competitive regions (stempel , 1973) . the canadian literature on ownership and control is also marred by the problematic inference of ideological effects through owner and managerial collusion. porter, for example, whose own theoretical position derives from both pluralist as well as elite perspectives, argues that the upper class backgrounds of the media elite provide evidence of this group's ability to use media content to legitimate existing class relations and political structures: 113 ...the unifying of value themes is achieved through the control of media of communication and therefore the structure of the ideological system becomes articulated with other systems of power. the ideological system must provide the justification for the economic system, the political system, and so forth, and this it does by attempting to show that the existing arrangements conform with the traditional value system (porter, 1965:460) . however, at the empirical level, porter's method of examining social origins of media personnel is hardly appropriate to his radical assumption of ideological hegemony. although his findings indicate largely upper class british origins of media management, ownership of the media industry is firmly in canadian hands. this leads to further conjecture: ...the absence of foreign control... would suggest that they are not sufficiently profitable to be taken over by foreign investors. it might also suggest a reluctance on the part of canadian owners to sell these properties because they are viewed, not primarily as economic instruments, but as institutions which have a public responsibility (1965:482) . in essence, porter's conclusion falls back on an assumption of autonomous and socially responsible media, which is a much different position from the one he began with. clement's attempt to update porter's analysis of canadian media and to recast it in a more explicitly critical perspective has also been only moderately successful in empirically demonstrating the relationship between media ownership and manipulation (clement, 1973). in addition, his analysis has been criticized for its naive economic determinism, its lack of fit between theory and data, and, recently, from within the critical tradition, for its inattention to non-economic, political and structural factors (see baldwin, 1977). the problematic assumptions of the ownership and 114 control literature on canada are even more suspect when juxtaposed with the results of the empirical research on political coverage by the canadian press. a content analysis of seven newspapers with highly-concentrated ownership established no hint of editorial collusion on the choice of issues, extent of coverage or editorial endorsements (wagenberg and soderlund, 1975) . although both the marxist and the elite perspectives are concerned in varying degrees with the power of the ruling elite to create and maintain ideological hegemony, the latter approach is concerned with the amalgamation and maintenance of bureaucratic power while the former is occupied with the analysis of class relations as they shape the distribution of power in all aspects of social life. when applied to mass media, the marxist, or class model, assumes that both the structure and content of the press and other media are determined by the historically-specific positions of power maintained by different classes. the media are part of the ideological superstructure which rests on the economy's material base. in modern capitalism, the media are the bourgeoisie's principal tools for hegemonic control over the working class. at the empirical level, adherents to the marxist approach do not concern themselves with the type of network analyses of media ownership which typifies the elite orientation. instead, they argue that the functions of the media are determined by the structured patterns of relations between classes rather than by individuals who occupy decisionmaking positions. because of this distinction, marxist media analyses 115 tend to avoid the problematic assumption of conspiratorial personal intervention and manipulation which detracts from even the most elegant studies in the elite tradition. the marxist model instead attempts to demonstrate media's role in creating and sustaining ideological hegemony through purely structural features. consequently, their analyses are historical and focus on horizontal and vertical integration, diversification, the nature of control and the conversion of information into a marketable commodity as well as the ideological and technological transfer from capitalist to peripheral third world countries (see, e.g., murdock and golding, 1973; 1977; golding, 1977; boyd-barrett, 1977; westergaard, 1977; janus, 1977). these pioneering works are suggestive and worthy of wider attention among sociologists operating in a critical tradition. both the social effects and the ownership and control literature, despite uneven evidence, rest on the axiomatic premise of media's broad societal impact, an assumption which has characterized the discipline since the first generation of media research. as the above overview suggests, this position has coloured not only the way in which theoretical questions are posed but also the way in which research is carried out. consequently, the accumulation of knowledge about the media's actual effects has been retarded. of course, there is probably more than some truth to the persistent belief that media programming contributes to a wide range of social behaviour in both children and adults and that the structure of media organizations influences the nature of this content. however, the methods used to investigate these concerns have not 116 proven appropriate to the task. this is precisely where the body of sociological knowledge in such relatively well-developed areas as power and stratification can be of help. ill . what lies ahead: towards a sociology of mass media mass communication, as a social institution, must be viewed in relation to what is known in sociology about the distribution of power and other social resources. in the area of social effects, for example, this strategy would round out the few exploratory attempts to trace media's treatment and impact on minorities and social classes by providing an incorporating framework from the various literatures on socialization, stratification and political behaviour. in the area of ownership and control , the task involves both theoretical and methodological effoics. the arguments that either competitive or monopoly ownership promotes consensus or favours dominant interests cannot be confirmed through the analysis of social origins or through studies of content in isolation. such arguments are based instead on a thesis of "general omission" (see breed, 1958) and would be better approached through an understanding of what is left out of mass media content as well as the economic, legal, political, technological and production constraints on media organizations in relation to the structural features of industrial market economies. analyses of the technological and organizational features of media production (donohew et. al. , 1972; janowitz, 1975; tunstall, 1971; tuchman, 1973) have a place in the general empirical tradition of the sociology of work and, indeed, remembering weber's concern with the 117 rationalization of an increasingly bureaucratic modern press, such inquiries make an important contribution to the literature on the labour process. concern with economic and non-economic structures shaping mass media is relatively undeveloped as a research area but is precipitating some theoretical interest, especially from the neo-marxist writersthis structural orientation is one of central importance to the study of canadian media because it goes beyond the analysis of the functions qua effects of media in a market economy directing needed attention to canada's international economic and political position as well as to the role of federal regulation and the question of public ownership. recent neo-marxist work on the nature of the capitalist state provides the basis for a suitable theoretical framework for such an analysis, especially discussions of the state's "mandate" to create and maintain the conditions of capital accumulation. the relevance of this orientation is in its spelling out of the state's legitimation functions through the analysis of symbols and sources of public support (see, e.g., representative readings in lindberg, et. al . , 1975) . an ideal candidate for such an inquiry is the question of jurisdiction over the cable communications system in canada. * nacro$c"6pio structural orientation would necessarily examine u.s. -canadian political and economic links as well as canadian _ federal and provincial relations and the role of federal regulatory agencies. such an approach conceptualizes the media not simply as a tool of economic and political interests but as an auxilliary of 118 either the economy or the state, depending on historically specific circumstances. in the case of canadian development, at times the economy has influenced the nature of media regulation, as in the case for the creation of the privately-owned television networks, and, at other times, the state in its political legitimacy function has intervened with clear opposition from economic interests, as in the case of establishing canadian content and ownership regulations. this type of orientation breaks out of the "media determinism" which characterizes so much of the discipline and acknowledges that the media, as "mediators", are more acted upon than they are actors. in addition, this approach by focusing on actual relations and policy decisions helps bridge the inferential gap from the structure of media to the ideological superstructure. this problem, as we have seen, flaws a great deal of the research, whether it be the behavioural approach to media's societal effects, content analysis or inquiries into the social origins and socialization of media management and personnel. the framework for the establishment of media sociology within the boundaries of the power and stratification tradition is hinted at in the work of marx, weber, and more recently, in statements by miliband, westergaard and most forcibly by murdock and golding: ...the sociological study of mass communications should not be seen as a self -contained professional specialism, and still less as one element in a grand multi-disciplinary approach to "communications", but as a part of an overall study of social and cultural reproduction which has traditionally occupied the heartland of sociological analysis. 119 in the case of advanced capitalist societies of north america and western europe with which we are specifically concerned here, this means that the sociology of mass communications should derive from, and feed into, the continuing debate on the nature and persistence of class stratification. more particularly, media sociology should address itself to the central problem of explaining how radical inequalities in the distribution of rewards come to be presented as natural and inevitable and are understood as such by those who benefit least from this distribution. in short, our argument is that media studies should be incorporated into the wider study of stratification and legitimation (murdock and golding, 1977: 12). what constitutes the basic assumptions of such an orientation and where does it lead the sociologist? the obvious point of departure is the realization that inequality in the distribution of social resources is a fundamental yet variable feature of modern societies. a media sociology would necessarily focus on the relationship between the unequal distribution of control over mass communications, at the levels of ownership and production of content, and the wider societal patterns of inequality. at the national level, this would center on the media's relationship to both the economy and the state, especially the media's functions in the market system and the process of legitimation through which structures of inequality are maintained and reproduced. at the international level, this form of media sociology would address the transfer of technology and programming between industrialized and developing countries as an indication of unequal exchange between center and periphery in a system of global stratification. 120 the advantage of this orientation lies in its attempt to link theoretically what has only been implicit in traditional approaches, the connection between media as an industry and as a transmitter of ideology. this synthesis is never achieved in the prevailing lasswellian paradigm which compartmentalizes source, channel and receiver effects. as an industry, the media in modern market systems are subject to a variety of economic, political and legal constraints, not the least of which is the maximization of profit subject to strict government regulation. as a transmitter of values, the media serve as mediators and translators among social groups as well as agents of legitimation for the existing social order. when viewed in relation to stratification and class structure, the material base and the ideological functions of the media merge. although this link between mass communications and social class has been the focus of recent inquiries, these isolated empirical findings on sex role portrayal, media use by the urban poor and ethnic stereotyping await integration into an holistic perspective. a power and stratification orientation not only shifts attention from the fruitless search after short-term media effects but directly links communications systems with' the other social institutions and agencies which channel social groups through the stratification system. this orientation calls for a new focus on the roles assumed by the family, the educational and the occupational agencies in the distribution of social knowledge and resources and the acquisition of cultural and social skills through the mass media. finally, the theoretical concern with legitimation would inevitably lead to queries of the nature of the relationship between media and the fostering or curbing of social dissent and political movements. 121 contrary to the popular verdict, mass media studies suffer neither from a paucity of theory nor from empirical overkill. they are flawed primarily because of their lack of direction and a unifying theme. thus this essay concludes with a call to bring mass media back into the mainstream of sociological inquiry. this central focus of sociology is the study of power and stratification. the specification of the nature of the link between media systems and the distribution of power and social resources may finally provide the appropriate entree for situating the study of mass communications in sociology proper. this is not a novel strategy. indeed, similar approaches are currently advocated for the incorporation of schooling research and studies of deviance. this orientation poses important yet relatively unexplored questions, the most general of which include defining media as a system of production, the analysis of its specialized occupations and internal power structure as well as its relation to class structure through its ideological and cultural functions. by focusing on these features of media in society we may at last develop a sociology of mass communications, one that provides the missing links between what we "say", in the form of our theorizing about the media, and what we "know", in the form of the enormous body of empirical findings on the nature and role of mass communication in contemporary society. department of sociology rosary college river forest, illinois 122 bibliography adorno, t. and m. horkheimer 1977 "the culture industry: enlightenment as mass deception." in j. curran, m. gurevitch and j. woollacott (eds.). mass communication and society. london: edward arnold. alford, r. 1975 "paradigms of relation between state and society." in: l. lindberg et. al. stress and contradiction in modern capitalism. allen, i. 1976 "mass communication and social integration." in g. gerbner (ed.) current trends in mass communication. the hague: mouton. baer, w. et. al. 1974 concentration of mass media ownership: ' assessing the state of current knowledge. santa monica: rand. baldwin, e. 1977 "the mass media and the corporate elite." canadian journal of sociology. vol. 2, no. 1 winter). 1-28 berelson, b., p. lazarsfeld and w. mcphee 1954 voting: a study of opinion formation in a presidential campaign. chicago-: university of chicago press. berelson, b. 1959 "the state of communication research." public opinion quarterly. no. 23, 1-6. blumler and e. katz (eds.) 1975 the uses of mass communication. beverly hills: sage publications. bowers, d. 1967 "a report on activity by publishers in directing newsroom decision 8 * journalism quarterly. no. 44, 43-52. boyd-barrett, 0. 1977 "media imperialism: towards a.n international framework for the analysis of media systems." in: j. curran, m. gurevitch and j. woollacott (eds.). mass fommuni cation and society. .london: edward arnold. carpenter, e. and m. mcluhan (eds.) 1960 explorations in communication. boston: beacon press. clement, w. 1973 the canadian corporate elite. toronto: mcclelland and stewart. 123 cohen, s. 1972 folk devils and moral panics. london: macgibbon and kee. donohew, g., p. tichenor and c. olien 1972 "gatekeeping: mass media systems and information control." in: f. kline and p. tichenor (eds.). current perspectives in mass communications research. beverly hills: sage publications. ellul, j. 1965 propaganda. n.y. alfred a. knopf. 1967 the technological society. n.y.: vintage. foumier, p. 1976 the quebec establishment. montreal: black rose. cans, h. 1972 "the famine in american mass communications research." american journal of sociology. vol. 77, no. 4 (january), 697-705. golding, p. 1977 "media professionalism in the third world: the transfer of an ideology." in: j. curran, m. gurevitch and j. woollacott (eds.) mass communication and society. london: edward arnold, 291-315. golding, p. and g. murdock 1978 "theories of communication and theories of society." communication . research. vol. 5, no. 3 (july), 339-357. hall, s. 1977 "culture, the media and the 'ideological effect'." in; j. curran, m. gurevitch, and j. woollacott (eds.). mass communication and society. london: edward arnold. 315-348. halloran, j. (ed.) , 1970 the effect *; of television. london: panther. hovland, c. 1954 "effects of the mass media of communications." in: g. lindzey (ed.) handbook of social psychology. vol. ii. cambridge, mass.: addison-wesley, 1062-1103. janowitz, m 1952 the community press in an urban setting. chicago: university of chicago press 1975 "professionals models in journalism." journalism quarterly . vol. 52, no. 4 . 618-626 124 janus, n. 1977 "research on sex roles in the mass media: toward a critical approach." the insurgent sociologist . vol. vii, no. 1 (summer) ,19-31. katz, e., m. gurevitch and h. haas 1973 "on the use of the mass media for important things." american sociological review. no. 38, 164-181. klapper, j. 1960 the effects of mass communication. n.y.: free press. lang, k. and g. lang 1959 the mass media and voting. n.y.: free press. 1968a politics and television. chicago: quadrangle books. 1968b voting and nonvoting. waltham, mass.: blaisdell publishing. lasswell, h. 1948 "the structure and function of communication in society." in: l. bryson (ed.). the communication of ideas. n.y.: harper lazarsfeld p., b. berelson and h. gaudet 1948 the people's choice. n.y.: columbia university press. lazarsfeld p. and r. merton 1948 "mass communication, popular taste and organized social action." in: l. bryson (ed.) . thp fnimmim cation of ideas. n.y.: harper. lindberg, l, a. alford, c. crouch and c. offe 1975 stress and contradiction in modern capitalism. lexington: heath. mayer, j. 1951 max weber and german politics. n.y.: faber. mccombs, m. 1967 "editorial endorsements: a study of influence." journalism quarterly, no. 44, 545-48. mcluhan, m. 1964 understanding media: the extensions of man. n.y.: mcgraw-hill. mcquail, d. 1976 review of sociological writing on the press. royal commission on the press. london: her majesty's stationery office. miliband, r. 1969 the state in capitalist society. london: quartet books. 125 mills, c. 1956 the power elite. n.y.: oxford university press. murdock, g. and p. golding 1973 "towards a political economy of mass communication." in: r. miliband and j. saville (eds.). the socialist register. london. 1977 "capitalism, communication and class relations." in: j. curran, m. gurevitch and j. woollacott (eds.). mass communication and society. london: edward arnold, 12-44. murphy, d. 1974 "the unfreedom of the local press." new society. vol. 19, no. 17. nixon, r. 1955 "trends in daily newspaper ownership since 1945." journalism quarterly . no. 32, 3-14. 1966 "trends in u.s. newspaper ownership concentration with competition." gazette. vol. xiv. no. 3, 181-93. nixon, r., and t. hahn 1971 "concentration of press ownership: a comparison of 32 countries." journalism quarterly . 48, 5-16. porter, j. 1965 the vertical mosaic . toronto: university of toronto press. 1972 "the ideological system: the mass media. in: b. singer (ed.) . communications in canadian society . toronto: copp clark, 119-162. singer, b. 1973 "mass society, mass media and the transformation of minority identity." british journal of sociologyno. 24, 140-150. stempel, g. 1973 "effects on performance of a cross-media monopoly." journalism monographs . (june) . tuchman, g. 1973 "making news by doing kork: routinizing the unexpected." american journal of sociology. vol. 79, 110-31. tunstall, j. 1971 journalists at work. london: constable. 126 kagenberg, p.., and w. soderlung 1975 "the influence of chain ownership on editorial comment in canada." journalism quarterly, no. 52, 93-98. kestergaard, j. 1977 "power, class and the media." in: j. curran, m. gurevitch and j. woollacott (eds.). mass communication and society. london: edward arnold, 95-116. williams, r. 1973 "base and superstructure in marxist cultural theory." npw t/>ft review. no. 82 (nov. -dec), 3-16. 1974 television: technology and cultural form._ london: fontana books 1977 marxism and literature. oxford: oxford university press. wright, c. 1960 "functional analysis and mass communication." public opinion quarterly. no. 24. — 1975 mass communication: a sociological perspective. n.y. : random house (2nd edition). 127 276 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism book review broke but unbroken: grassroots social movements and their radical solutions to poverty by augusta dwyer. winnipeg: fernwood publishing, 2011. $19.95 cad paperback. isbn: 9781552664063. pages: 1,169. reviewed by sabrina fernandes1 in broke but unbroken, augusta dwyer uses journalistic narratives to describe and examine stories of struggle, despair and success about four social movements: the landless rural workers movement (mst) in brazil, the peasant union of indonesia (spi), the indian alliance, and argentina’s national movement of factories recovered by workers (mnfrt). the title term “broke but unbroken” provides the synthesis of what the book sets out to do: identify the intersections of hopelessness and hope where grassroots social movements concentrate their efforts on diminishing poverty in a more sustainable and effective way than governments or aid institutions. by collecting personal anecdotes and situating them in the broader social and political context of social movement struggle against capitalism and globalization within their countries, she connects the four movements as they work towards what dwyer refers as imagining grassroots solutions to their daily struggle while promoting sustainable alternatives to problems created from local and global sources as a way to fight poverty rather than simply coping with it. a major theme throughout the book is how the movements are reconfiguring the way poverty has been approached by policymakers and aid institutions. dwyer emphasizes that the tactics of grassroots social movements are often misunderstood or misrepresented because of the way western society has been shaped to think about poverty: as something so complex only elite experts from government or global institutions can manage it. in fact, grassroots tactics are perceived as out of the ordinary because they combine methods of protest and resistance with the search for and implementation of sustainable solutions. one of the 1 sabrina fernandes is currently a ph.d. candidate in the department of sociology and anthropology, carleton univeristy. her research interests include brazilian politics, development and underdevelopment, gender issues, and education. book review: broke but unbroken | 277 ways this is done is through decentralized/horizontal decision-making, to which the author credits many of the success stories experienced by the movements. for the mst, decentralized decisions have been fundamental to the maintenance of such a diverse and widespread movement. the support for organic farming, for example, is a solution from below that has enabled mst farmers to keep afloat through small-scale organic production while avoiding the replication of the unsustainable industrial agricultural system they fight against. it is “production based on our values,” one member says in reference to the rejection of chemical pesticides and fertilizers while ensuring that members can make a living from farming with fair prices and distribution of land and resources. this is also reflected in the relationship between forest dwellers and the forest in indonesia. education is explored as another common element to grassroots movements’ strategies. more often than not, research on grassroots movements highlights how “raising awareness” is a priority but only superficially explores how movements’ organizational structure and their educational strategies are deeply entrenched. dwyer corrects this gap by analysing education as a fundamental strategy of grassroots movements that truly believe in participatory democracy and autonomy. for the mst, education is such an important tool that it has established its own schools, training centres, and universities (p.18). for the spi, the alliance between students and peasants strengthened their cause. in india, former slum dwellers take the role of educators in order to help others make a living and access secure housing (p. 89). for the mnfrt, education means access to training and information so that every worker has the knowledge to run the cooperatives (p.145). the book’s narratives are well analysed in a critique of capitalism and the impact of globalization on people’s right to food, water, housing, and job security are also complemented with secondary literature. these include references made both by dwyer and by the movement members themselves demonstrating how grassroots movements perceive the merging of theory and practice to be essential for the creation of alternatives. this shows how these movements’ strengths go beyond organizational capacity; an argument she notes has been promoted in neoliberal thought to disconnect poverty alleviation from the need to actually transform political and economic systems. she challenges this view by proposing that, for example in the case of peasant movements in brazil and indonesia, “through direct action and the physical taking of land, their members are challenging the definition of empowerment 278 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism that obscures the material basis of power” (p.78). instead of promoting “empowerment” through aid, structural adjustments, and even some forms of microcredit, which the author argues do not always address the root of the problem and fail to take into account particular traits of each society and culture (p. 99), grassroots movements link it to changing mindsets, stronger class-consciousness, and the continuous flow of support that comes from community solidarity. although it is easy for the reader to get lost in the personal anecdotes of movement members, dwyer’s narrative style is effective because it brings a human face back to the understanding of social movements. by shifting power to those telling their own stories, she creates counterframes to the ones promoted by opposing politicians and mainstream media. the book shows how it is in fact the innovation behind the movements’ methods and the way they reflect the consciousness of the millions of people represented that make the movements capable of building resilience even when it is hard to develop solutions to crises. the author demonstrates this through examples of creativity, solidarity and strength when groups find themselves at a critical point; when it is sí o sí (yes or yes), as an argentine factory worker put it. the combination of inventiveness, optimism, and altruism, which dwyer successfully highlights, works because it is so novel and unusual to strategies inherent to capitalist dominance associated with conformism to systematic poverty and inequality that it shakes its structures and creates positive new ways of thinking and producing. these alternatives contrast with traditional policies and government initiatives that the movements claim have not provided a long-term solution but simply a way to “manage their poverty better” (p.99). by presenting four grassroots movements from distinct parts of the world in a unifying way, dwyer shows that, despite their many differences and peculiarities they share similar strategies, visions, and even transnational networks of support. that is mostly because they share a common enemy centered on capitalism and globalization, although it takes many shapes: agribusinesses, hydroelectric dams, mining, colonial states, corruption, perverse laws, and even conservationists. the portrayal of how movements have confronted these forces shows that, in addition to direct action and similar strategies, it may be necessary to negotiate and compromise in order to guarantee a reasonable outcome for the membership. while dwyer shows some of these movements’ successful stories, she poses the question of whether their methods can be replicated and bring about positive returns in places other than book review: broke but unbroken | 279 the countries she explores. by interweaving the stories of other, some smaller, movements, she shows that replication is possible though their success can only be sustainable when shaped towards the need of a wide membership, which emerges when the movement favours ideas from below through horizontal decision-making based on collective needs, autonomy, and the principle of solidarity within grassroots organizing (p.21). but the question remains on whether the changes are sustainable. the author argues that as long as the economic system persists in creating poverty, the poor will keep fighting. the analysis of the cooperatives in argentina demonstrates the constant struggle with cycles of poverty and inequality and how crisis tends to return and create new vulnerabilities requiring movements to maintain their search for sustainable solutions to their problems in a way that prevents community gains from becoming losses. 133 community colleges and the division between mental and manual labour david robinson poulantzas ' (1978) analysis of the contribution of the educational apparatus to the reproduction of the division between mental and manual labour is elaborated upon to provide a theoretical framework for examining community colleges in terms of their relationship to the capitalist labour process. the thesis is that community colleges legitimize political relations in the labour process by defining the knowledge of graduates as inferior to the knowledge of university-educated workers trained in comparable specialities . community college programs designed for engineering technicians are discussed in seme detail and a number of suggestions for future research are advanced. alternate routes vol. 5 1982 134 cet article utilise i 'analyse de poulantzas (1978) sur la contribution de i 'appareil educatif dans la reproduction ie la division entre travail manuel et travail intellectuel -our elaborer un cadre theorique permettant i ' examen de la relation entre les colleges communautaires et le proces du travail aapitaliste . l'auteur soutient que les colleges communautaires legitiment les relations politiques dans le proc"es de travail en accordant un statut infirieur au savoir de leurs gradues face aux universitaires formes dans des domaines comparables . ii analyse en detail les programmes des colleges communautaires des techniciens en genie et sugg s ere quelques avenues de recherche . few theoretical or empirical analyses of community college systems have been conducted by canadian sociologists of education. as pike's (1981) recent review of canadian literature on postsecondary education makes very clear, canadian sociologists have devoted far less attention to the area of higher education then they have to elementary and secondary education. the most obvious reason for the paucity of literature on community colleges is that their emergence has been a very recent development in the history of postsecondary education in canada. in fact, most community colleges first opened their doors to students in the early sixties. in spite of their late inception in canada, community colleges currently serve a surprising proportion of postsecondary students, although universities continue to maintain the largest share of graduates, in 1978, community colleges awarded 62,443 135 certificates and diplomas compared to 103,738 degrees awarded by universities (clark and zsigmond , 1981 : 62 , 66) . in the united states, where the genisis of community colleges can be traced to the turn of the century, some sociological work has been carried out. this literature emphasizes the extent to which community colleges have contributed to a stratification process in postsecondary education in the united states as well as the implications of this process for individual mobility (pincus , 1978 , 1980; karabel , 1977 ; mayes, 1977; bowles and gintis,1976; zwerling , 1976) . 1 in this paper, i will depart somewhat from this emphasis, to focus on the role of community colleges in the transmission of skills which are employable in the workplace. while the stratification process is not the immediate concern here, it is, however, an important one at a more general level. in raising the issue of community colleges and work skills, various perspectives which focus on the relationship between schools and the workplace will be examined. after identifying some of the shortcomings of this literature, an alternative position will be proposed, one which focuses on the ideological role of the educational system in the transmission of skills. the work of nicos poulantzas on the contribution of the educational apparatus to the reproduction of the division of mental and manual labour will be utilized since it is particularly helpful in understanding the relationship between community college education and the capitalist workplace. one of the most salient features of community college systems in canada is their emphasis on vocational training or alternate routes vol. 5 1982 136 educational programs which are designed to prepare individuals to assume particular positions in the work world (martin and macdonell , 1978 : 28) . unlike postsecondary education at the university level, which is typically more general, community college programs are often geared toward specific work destinations. as the designation "community college" conveys, many of these institutions are perceived as responding to particular labour market demands arising in the communities in which they are situated. a variety of career -or iented programs are offered to students: training in numerous engineering and medical technologies, nursing studies, clerical and business education, and various other vocational programs which evoke images of skilled positions in the realm of work. the term "community college" is normally associated with larger educational establishments offering a comprehensive range of postsecondary programs. in addition, a variety of more specialized institutions such as schools of technology, agriculture, and nursing, can be included under the broad category of "community college". in comparison to the type of credential conferred by the university, community colleges offer no degrees, although, in some provinces, studies may be continued at the university level. community college programs usually lead to certificates and diplomas, with courses varying 2 in length from one to three years of study." although the "training for skills" function is often explicitly claimed by community colleges, recent "conflict" interpretations of schooling call such an assertion into question (bowles and gintis,1976; shecter , 197" ; collins , 1979; 137 harp, 1980). for example, sociologists who have investigated the origins of public education in canada have advanced the view that the need for technical skills was never a major impetus in the development of canadian educational policy. nor, as its proponents implied, was universal public education designed to provide mobility for the masses. the schools were depended upon to constitute "a successful program of integration" which "would lead to a passivity on the part of people towards the inequality of society" (harp , 1980 : 222) . according to shecter (1977:379), the school system was fashioned to train workers who would be sufficiently disciplined to perform the function of labour in industrial capitalism. bleasdale (1978:14) writes: "the social organization of the school was, in its early form, an almost exact replica of factory organization." with specific regard to technical and vocational training in canada, after examining the historical record, shecter (1977:390-398) and harp (1980: 222-224) arrive at similar judgements. they conclude that the real goal behind such education reflected its social control potential rather than a desire to deliver technical skills. a number of theoretical stances concerning the school's ability to supply technical skills can be isolated. the perspective which views the education system as primarily engaged in training students to fulfil the technical requirements of work has been identified as "technological functionalism" in the sociological literature on education. adherents of this position, perhaps best represented by burton clarke (1962), argue that the skills marketed by the school are tailored to alternate routes vol. 5 1982 138 the exigencies of a technologically complex and advanced societies. in contrast thecentral argument running through the neo-marxist stance put forward by bowles and gintis (1976) is that the chief role of the school is to turn out students whose non-cognitive personality traits and attitudes are conducive to acquiescence in a capitalist work world. in this view of the manner in which educational activities are related to the workplace, the ostensible function of the school in the delivery of cognitive or* technical skills camouflages its role in producing students who will adapt easily to the social relations of production. in this way, the education system aids in the smooth reproduction of capitalist society. randall collins amplifies on bowles and gintis' position that the school's forte is not in the realm of technical training. writing in a neo-weberian conflict vein, collins portrays the school as an agency for producing and distributing status cultures, suggesting that status groups manipulate educational policy in order to regulate entrance into their particular ranks. the myriad types of knowledge which the school produces are understood as contributions to the identity and exclusiveness of status groups rather than to the need for skilled workers. while collins shares bowles and gintis' indictment of technological functionalist theories, his analysis does not proceed from a critique of capitalist society. bowles and gintis have influenced conceptions of the relationship between schools and work more than any other recent writers in the sociology of education. for this reason, the 139 tenets of their thesis and the criticisms which have been leveled against them will be explored further. in their celebrated schooling in capitalist america , bowles and gintis (1976:47) assert that, in the past, theorists have incorrectly perceived work in capitalist society as essentially a technical process requiring an education system which prepares individuals for mastery of technical skills. alternatively, they point to work under capitalism as being principally a social process demanding schools which equip students with the social dispositions necessary for the success of the capitalist system of production. bowles and gintis provide examples of how the evolution of the education system in the united states has been shaped by interests which have primarily reflected capital's need for control over the labour process, rather than for the technical expertise of workers (1976:73-81). in their formulation of what has been 4 labeled the "correspondence principle", they describe how the education system accomplishes its task: the educational system helps integrate youth into the economic system, we believe, through a structural correspondence between its social relations and those of production. the structure of social relations in education not only inures the student to the discipline of the work place, but develops the type of personal demeanor, or modes of self -presentation, self-image, and socialclass identifications which are the crucial ingredients of job adequacy (1976:131). beyond correspondence at the aggregate level, the social relations at varying levels in the education system correspond to the social relations at different layers in the hierarchical division of labour. kence, emphasis on rule following at lower levels of the education system (e.g., junior and senior high alternate routes vol. 5 1982 140 school) parallels the capitalist imperative of tight control over workers at lower levels in the workplace. at higher levels in the education system (e.g., university), the social relations are arranged to prepare students for roles in higher levels of the workplace where dependability and internalization ot the norms of tne enterprise are expected. in their application of the correspondence principle to the educational processes of community colleges, bowles and gintis draw attention to the heavy vocational orientation there compared to four-year universities. they suggest that community colleges have evolved in response to the needs generated by the expansion of corporate capital for new kinds of workers which they define as "skilled sub-professional white-collar workers" (1976:205,206). with regard to social relations, their impression is that the general milieu of the commmunity college classroom bears more resemblance to the high school than to the university. community colleges have often been described as "high schools with ashtrays" (1976: 2] 2). more guidance and control is operative in the community college, there is much less room for individual decisionmaking regarding selection of courses, and the student is restrictd in the pursuit of a liberal education. bowles and gintis also remark that discipline is stressed much more in the community college than in the university, with specific assignments and deadlines more likely to be employed in evaluation procedures. bowles and gintis' work has been helpful in identifying elements of the education system which had previously escaped 141 the attention of sociologists. their contribution has, however, met with a critical reception from neo-marxists as well as sociologists of other theoretical persuasions. the most pervasive objection to their analysis is that it over-estimates the fit between education systems and the capitalist workplace. shapiro (1980), while defending the position that schools assist in the maintnance of the capitalist system, allows the school much more autonomy from the direct influence of capital on educational policy. he suggests that, far from being completely malleable, education systems experience much conflict and contradiction. gorlick c1977) and apple (1980) join in this criticism, contending that students do not merely submit passively to the social relations of the classroom. moreover, worker resistance to the social relations in the workplace is ubiquitous. the implication is that the correspondence principle may not be functioning as bowles and gintis believe. another major problem is that bowles and gintis' approach neglects a large area of investigation which may be crucial in explicating the ideological role of education systems in capitalist society. the concern here is that bowles and gintis have taken for granted the formal or overt curriculum of the school by focusing almost exclusively on what has been feferred to as the "hidden curriculum" (white , 1980 : 56 , 57 , 81) . in the sociology of education literature, the "hidden curriculum" pertains to the mechanisms by which values and norms are promoted by the school. as opposed to the formal content of the explicit curriculum (i.e., such school subjects as alternate routes vol. 5 1982 142 mathematics and reading) , the "hidden curriculum" operates through "the organization of the classroom and the rewards and punishments schools employ to regulate student behavior" (. hum, 1978 : 192) . in this context, because bowles and gintis view the relationship between the education system and the workplace almost exclusively in terms of how the former reproduces the social relations of work, they omit analysis of what is transmitted to students through the overt or explicit curriculum. recent developments in the perspective emerging in britain "the new sociology of education", have challenged this convention of taking the school curriculum as a given. this work points to the importance of examining the nature of school knowledge, an area which has previously remained o unexplored by sociologists. bowles and gintis' assumption that the capitalist system does not rely upon the school for technical skills appears to have prevented them from considering the fact that students at all levels of the education system spend most of their school hours learning and being taught what is presented as "objective knowledge". even if it is conceded that the school's role in reproducing the social relations of production supercedes its contribution to the technical forces of production, it would not be safe to assume that the school has no contribution to nake in training workers to perform specific skills. many workers arrive at the workplace ready to carry out tasks which rhey would be unprepared to conduct successfully if it were not for their educational experience. for example, the computer programmer must learn the skills necessary to command particular 143 computer operations, the draughtsman must be proficient in executing designs on the draughtboard, and the medical practicioner must know the appropriate treatments to prescribe for given illnesses. that the educational system at various levels has the capacity to equip individuals with skills which are, to some extent, applicable in the workplace cannot be q debated. what can be questioned is the logic by which these skills are organized or divided in the capitalist workplace and, subsequently, how the education system succeeds or fails in responding to such logic. it is in this respect that it becomes important to closely scrutinize the overt curriculum which pertains to the delivery of technical skill , and how it relates to the capitalist workplace. from this vantage point, what warrants study is not only the varying social relations at different levels of the education system but, also, the types of knowledge which are peculiar to particular levels. the sociological investigation of classroom knowledge is particularly important when it is considered that the education system is purported to be an agency which generates and dispenses "knowledge". this is not intended to suggest that the elements of the hidden curriculum are of no significance. as apple proposes (1979:40), there is a complementary interplay between the social relations of the classroom and the formal corpus of school knowledge. nevertheless, it is certainly true that sociologists need to know much more about classroom knowledge and its affinity to the workplace. before proceeding to an examination of the relationship between the community college curriculum and the organization alternate routes vol. 5 1982 144 of the capitalist labour process, it is necessary to review some of the primary characteristics of the latter. the owners of the means of production organize and control the labour process to correspond to their interests. work under capitalism is not arranged and modified according to the needs of the workers who perform the labour. braverman's (1974) work has been useful in identifying features of the division of labour in monopoly capitalism. a central theme in his writing is that the capitalist labour process separates the functions of conception and execution: "the separation of hand and brain is the most decisive single step in the division of labour taken by the capitalist mode of production" (braverman, 1974 : 126). this separation results in a small number of managers becoming responsible for the mental labour involved in planning and organizing production while the majority of workers simply carry out the work which has been conceived by management. effectively, capital's monopolization of the technical knowledge of the labour process is ensured and workers are prevented from initiating any changes in the organization of production. poulantzas (1978) has given more rigorous theoretical attention to the notion of the separation of conception from execution, which he speaks of as the mental/manual division of labour. he is emphatic on the point that the division of mental and manual labour is essentially an ideological division rather than one inherent in the actual technologies of capitalist production. it is in this context that he writes (1978:225): "in the actual organization of the labour process, the social division of labour, directly dependant on the relations of 145 production, dominates the technical division." echoing braverman, poulantzas asserts that this division takes place as a condition for ensuring that knowledge is monopolized by capital, through its agents, and removed from the direct producers or manual labourers. the work of mental labour is more precisely delimited in the following manner (1978:238): we could thus say that every form of work that takes the form of a knowledge from which the direct producers are excluded, falls on the mental labour side of the capitalist production process, irrespective of its empirical/natural content, and that this is so whether the direct producers actually do know how to perform this work but do not do so (again not by chance) , or whether they in fact do not know how to perform it (since they are systematically kept away from it) , or whether again there is quite simply nothing that needs to be known. the management and supervision of workers, which constitutes political relations in the capitalist labour process, are legitimized by the division of mental and manual labour. the functions of management and supervision in their capitalist form are justified by the concentration of knowledge or technical expertise in the hands of those individuals who carry out these functions. poulantzas describes this monopolization as a "secrecy of knowledge" which excludes manual labour and is a further step in the capitalist compulsion to detach the direct producers from their means of production. manual labourers are ideologcally dominated by capital in the sense that the knowledge they are supposed not to possess is depicted as the basis for their preclusion from participation in the organization of production. poulantzas elaborates (1978:241) it is not by chance that the various categories of foreman who perform direct supervisory tasks also alternate routes vol. 5 1982 146 present thenselves as bearers of a particular knowledge in relation to the workers whom they control. this is precisely how this work of management and control that is necessary to every "co-operative process" falls to mental labour within the capitalist social division of labour. gorz (1976:175,176) provides a good example of how the possession of knowledge is used to defend political relations, citing the reflections of a technician who justified his supervisory role over manual workers on the basis of his aquisition of training in calculus. the technician admitted he did not use calculus in his job and that workers could gain comparable knowledge through practical experience. he maintained, however, that his calculus set him apart from other workers because he had gained a more comprehensive theoretical knowledge of the work supervised. most of poulantzas' discussion of mental and manual labour is specific to his theory of the political and ideological determinants of the "new petty bourgeoisie". the "new petty bourgeoisie" are agents of capital who perform unproductive labour (economic determination), carry out the functions of supervision and management in the labour process (political determination) , and are located primarily on the mental side of the division between mental and manual labour (ideological determination). it is not necessary, however, to view the division between mental and manual labour only as it pertains to the class determination of the new petty bourgeoisie. the division between mental and manual labour has wider applications. it exists in varying degrees within mental and manual labour and can be understood as a process tendential to 147 1 2 alj levels of the labour process (1978:255). on the side of manual labour, poulantzas notes that the division between mental and manual labour is manifested in the various partitions of skill that exist in the labour process (unskilled, semi-skilled , etc. ) . understood as a monopolization of knowledge which legitimates political relations, the division between mental and manual labour can also be detected in work categories which have traditionally been perceived as mental in orientation. braverman (1974:243-258) illustrates this point in his treatment of how the functions of conception and execution are separated in clerical work as management takes possession of the knowledge involved in the technology of office work. the same holds true for scientific workers who perform supervisory and management functions. braverman (1974:236-247) portrays their work as being divided in such a manner that knowledge is concentrated in varying measures at different levels within their ranks. poulantzas devotes considerable attention to the contribution of the capitalist education system to the reproduction of the division between mental and manual labour (1978:259-270). although based upon observations of the french educational system, his basic propositions may be reworked and applied to the role played by community colleges in the division between mental and manual labour. first, poulantzas considers the major role of the school to be the preparation of mental labour for its function in capitalist production. at the level of higher education, this is achieved through the provision of a general knowledge of the symbols and rituals of technical expertise appropriate to mental labour. alternate routes vol. 5 1982 148 at levels ir the system charged with preparation for manual labour, interest is mainly in teaching "discipline, respect for authority, and the veneration of mental labour that is always "somewhere else" in the educational apparatus" (1978: 266). poulantzas assigns no weight to the ability of the educational system to transfer specific skills to students who will carry out manual work. all components of the educational process in elementary and secondary schools are dismissed as having no utility, with the exception of the hidden curriculum. similarly, poulantzas proposes that the education of mental labour is so general that it is not geared toward providing specific technical skills. again, he emphasizes that the primarv educational transmission at this level entails the ideological "secrecy of knowledge" which elevates mental labour above manual labour. poulantzas' position is well summarized in the following statement (1978:266): the main role of the capitalist school is not to "qualify" manual and mental labour in different ways, but far more to disqualify manual labour (to subjugate it) , by only qualifying mental labour there is no doubt that, in expounding his position on education, poulantzas has exaggerated the role of the division between mental and manual labour. in dichotomizing the education system in terms of preparation for mental and manual labour, he ignores subtle variations at different levels in the system. in one sense, it could even be argued that poulantzas' analysis of the training of manual labour brings us no further than the correspondence principle, in that he reduces the schooling process to the operation of the hidden curriculum. what is seminal about poulantzas' thinking on the school, however, is 149 that he credits the education system with the capacity to inculcate particular conceptions of mental and manual labour which aid in the legitimation of the capitalist division of labour . elements of the division between mental and manual labour are visible in the way in which the education system fragments knowledge to reflect different levels of skills. this is evident in the categories of credentials for many professional specializations, each purporting to correspond to a particular concentration of knowledge or technical expertise. the community college system plays a crucial role in this fragmentation of knowledge. in many cases, the programs available to students relegate them to places in the labour process which are associated with lower or intermediate rungs in the hierarchy of knowledge. graduates of university programs, on the other hand, are placed in the upper reaches of the hierarchy^ if we refer to the division between mental and manual labour in terms of the propensity for knowledge to be monopolized at certain levels in the labour process, it is not difficult to locate community college graduates on the manual side of the division in contrast to university graduates. the discrepancy between the places occupied by the two groups in the workplace is demonstrated in table 1, which presents the most frequent occupational categories of students who graduated from community colleges and universities in 1976. the figures are based on the 1978 statistics canada employment outcome survey, involving a sample of 29,609 postsecondary graduates (clark and zsigmond ,1981) . alternate routes vol. 5 1982 iso table 1 most frequent occupations of 1976 university and college graduates senior § middle managers management support (accountants, auditors, financial 5 personnel officers, etc.) architects 5 engineers architecture s engineering technologists, draughting occupations, surveyors salespeople (commodities) elementary 5 secondary school teaching 5 related occupations vocational § community college, § specialized teachers mathematicians, statiticians, computer scientists physicians, dentists, veterinarians pharmacists, dieticians, optometrists, medical 5 dental technologists nurses, therapists lawyers 5 other law occupations social welfare, community service workers finance 5 statistics clerks stenographers 5 typists general office clerks other » university average annual salary $ 5 college average annual salary $ 7.4 17,200 4.5 12,600 6.9 14,500 3.1 13,100 4.8 18,200 5.5 13,500 2.8 13,900 4.6 11,000 29.5 15,8-2.7 8,900 4.1 16,000 2.7 16,100 2.4 18,800 6.5 12,400 20.0 13,000 3.2 16,000 2.8 14,100 4.2 9,600 6.8 9,100 2.6 10,000 33.4 13,500 39.7 12,500 100.0 100.0total source: table 1 is taken from tab]e 6 and 7 of clark and zsigmond (1981:63,67). the figures represent estimates based on the total sub-sample of 18,849 university graduates and 10,790 college graduates. data on the occupations of 4,629 respondents (15.61 of the total sample) were not available. only the ten most frequent occuptional categories for each group are indicated. consequently, emptv cells do not imply freqencies of zero. the actual frequencies for many of the emptv cells, however, would be too small to permit statistical reliability sub-sample sizes and missing data documentation arp derived from the statistics canada 1976 employment outcome survey data file maintained by the social science data archives, carleton university, ottawa. 151 the sample was designed to represent the 1976 canadian cohort of 26,250 "college", and 66,481 university graduates from nine provinces (qubec was excluded). the tabulations reveal that, relative to university graduates, community college graduates have a much lower rate of participation at the managerial decision-making level. moreover, the large differences in salaries imply that community college graduates who are employed in this category are likely to be assigned to the lower echelons. their representation in the "management support" category leads to a similar conclusion about their position in the workplace relative to university graduates. the clerical occupations, where a large number of community college graduates are clustered, suggest roles comprised of little control over the direction and organization of work. it is also notable that, in the classifications related to engineering and health services, community college graduates fulfil support or assistant functions to higher level positions which are linked to university training. a range of occupational specializations, such as business administration, engineering, and health sciences, may be pursued at both the university and community college levels. what often distinguishes community college programs from university programs within the same specialization, however, is that recruits of the former are prepared for positions which are frequently subject to the supervision of university graduates in the political relations of the labour process. titles such as "assistants", "technicians"., and "technologists" abound in the course offerings of community colleges and are alternate routes vol. 5 1982 152 indicative of the positions community college graduates occupy vis-a-vis workers who have completed university degrees. the specific tasks which its graduates are and are not qualified to perform in the actual work setting are often made quite explicit by the community college. for instance, in an academic calendar for one of ontario's colleges of applied arts and technology (caats) , the roles of graduates are often negatively defined in terms of what the graduate cannot expect to do. it is not uncommon for course descriptions to declare that certain work duties are reserved only for individuals who possess the kind of advanced training provided by universities. in turn, students are alerted to the fact that these superiorqualified workers will be responsible for supervising the work of community college graduates. one is left with the distinct impression that this community college wished to allay any illusions about the scope of the training it provided, and to establish that the knowledge it had to offer was inferior to that of the university. a good example of how the community college circumscribes the range of students' work skills in relation to "advanced" university education is provided in the training of engineering technicians and technologists. accounting for about 16.2 per cent of community college graduates in 1976 (clark and zsigmond, 1981:54), the case of technicians and technologists is worth chronicling in some detail. a unesco document which reports on an international comparison of the education of technicians and technologists, describes the work of this group as "middle men". according to the report, their activities fall between 153 lower level "craftsmen" and university trained engineers, "top level personnel" (french. 1981 : 16-17 ) . braverman (1974: 236-247) has noted that, under monopoly capitalism, the separation of conception from execution has penetrated the work of engineers and other scientists. he atttributes the appearance of a middle layer cadre of technical workers to this phenomenon within the engineering profession. referring to the new group of technical workers, he writes (1974:245,246): there is generally no accepted definition of the term but the distinguishing characteristic of the technician is that he or she functions as a "support" for the engineer or scientist; the routine which can be passed to a lower-paid and slightly trained person goes to the technician. the two to three year community college training period undergone by canadian technicians and technologists would 17 suggest that they are more than "slightly" trained. utilizing poulantzas' criterion, however, it is clear that this group would incline towards the manual side of the division between mental and manual labour, in light of their relationship to engineers. in the province of ontario, materials promoting technician and technologist careers in the various engineering specialities emphasize that training in such fields offers challenging opportunities in the labour force, where comprehensive practical and theoretical skills will be demanded. the accompanying enumerations of routines in which graduates are expected to show competence, point, however, to very specific work skills. the materials intimate that more creative work is the preserve of professional engineers who will summon the services of alternate routes vol. 5 1982 technicians and technologists to implement the practical operations necessary to test their ideas. when more stimulating responsibilities are delegated, aspiring technicians and technologists are assured that engineers will often be available to provide direction. it is not unreasonable to speculate that engineering technology students are reminded daily of the relative merits of their knowledge to that of engineers. frequently, their instructors are professional engineers who have had several years of industrial experience before teaching. not only is educational experience presented as the basis for the exclusion of technicians and technologists from much of the work of engineers, but, within the area of engineering technology itself, there is a further differentiation. the training of technicians, which normally lasts for two years in the community college, is designed to develop skills which are more manual in nature than those of the technologist. the technologist, whose schooling is extended to an additional year, is supposedly certified for more theoretical pursuits. as an electronics engineering technology instructor in an ontario caat put it, the work of the technician is a "hands-on operation" while the technologist's duties require more "thinking". in turn, just as the engineer's training justifies the supervisory role over technicians 3nd technologists, the technologist will sometimes be responsible for overseeing the work of technicians. in ontario, many of the technician and technology programs share a common core of courses during the first four semesters of study, with technologists remaining for a fifth and sixth semester. eight months' of supplementary 1ss training apparently equips technologists with the necessary knowledge to enable them to take a superordinate position to technicians. the role of the educational system in the legitimation of political relations in the labour process is particularly evident in this example. the argument has additional cogency when we consider that the schooling of most engineers, whose knowledge is reputed to be "advanced" in comparison to the knowledge of technicians and technologists, takes place in four years of university training. the education system makes a very definitive contribution to the reproduction of the division between mental and manual labour as it applies to the case of engineers and the engineering technology coterie. in fact, the education system appears to have been structured to permanently maintain the sharp division between the two groups. to take the example of ontario again, the terminal quality of community college credentials prevents technicians and technologists from building on their educational experience to become engineers. the only course open to themis to enrol in a university engineering program. clement (1981: 213-214) provides a good example of this educational barrier in one of the inco mining company's research and development department where engineers and technicians worked closely together in a team environment. in spite of a fair degree of autonomy and input into the research process, the only strategy for career mobility available to the community collegetrained technician was a return to school to pursue a university degree. because the diplomas and certificates awarded by caats are not transferable to university programs, to attain the status of alternate routes vol. 5 1982 is6 engineer the technician or technologist must return to "square one" in the postsecondary system. while i have focused on the training of engineering technicians and technologists, it would not be difficult to expand the analysis to other community college programs. as alluded earlier, a large number of programs are geared towards preparing graduates for roles in the workplace which are subordinate to positions filled by individuals with university training. with its many skill distinctions, the health sciences field provides parallels to the engineering speciality in terms of the division between mental and manual labour. community college programs related to dental, laboratory, and pharmacy technology are also comparable to engineering technician and technologist programs. the field of nursing comprises the largest segment of community college graduates. this is clearly a field subservient to medical careers reserved for university graduates, including nurses trained in four-year bachelor of science programs. finally, community college courses that provide training for cartographic, survey, architectural, museum, and library technicians, and assistants in the legal and accounting professions, can be situated within this 19 discussion. theorists influenced by the technological functionalist paradigm might, argue that the various divisions in postsecondary education reflect the need to arrange the education system in a manner which efficiently transmits technical skills. included in this tradition would be the insistence that advances in science and technology have made it necessary to organize 157 training so that certain individuals master the practical skills required to execute technical advances made in production. at a more theoretical level, the education system is requested to supply a cadre of experts who posses the esoteric knowledge needed to introduce improvements and innovations, as well as to supervise workers who are involved in more rudimentary facets of production. implicit in this view is the assumption that the arrangement of technical roles in production emanates naturally from the progress of technology, and that the labour process is rationally organized to guarantee that production proceeds at maximum efficiency. it is not reconcilable with the marxist premise that the technical division of labour is shaped by the social division of labour. the ideological components of the education system, which operate to maintain the technical division of labour endemic to capitalism, are undiscovered because the technical knowledge disseminated by the school and its application to production are taken for granted. the thesis of this paper also contradicts some of the tenets of bowles and gintis' neo-marxist approach. they do not include an analysis of the formal curriculum of the school and it will be recalled that they perceive the education system as engaged chiefly in the preparation of workers for the social relations of production rather than the training of students for technical competence in the field of work. i submit, however, that the transmission of work skills is central to the role of the community college system. this training function is relevant not so much for its technical alternate routes vol. 5 1982 158 contribution to production, as for its ideological role in the reproduction between mental and manual labour. this position has a number of implications for further research. several questions arise regarding mechanisms within the community college curriculum which serve to mould students' conceptions about their role in the labour process. it is important to focus on how the knowledge presented in the community college classroom is compared to the knowledge university graduates are believed to possess. the promotional literature which the community college prepares to attract its clientele seems to convey the notion that the community college is more elementary than the university. the actual dynamics of how this view is imparted to students, however, requires examination. answers to these questions may revolve primarily around an appraisal of the overt curriculum. the problem of how constituents of the hidden curriculum interact and conform with the overt curriculum may also be relevant. in this connection, it would be appropriate to consider how the modes of social control and organizational structures within the two main branches of postsecondary education reinforce the division between mental and manual labour. in focusing on particular programs, careful attention must be given to the way in which community college curricula vary from university programs in comparable specialities. it may be that community college and university students in related fields share similar curriculum content. if so, an identification of the efforts made to legitimize these similarities will become an essential part of the investigation. an integral component 159 of the overall inquiry would be an examination of the responses of community college students to their anticipated roles in the workplace as well as their perceptions of the positions they will assume in relation to university students. more particularly, such an analysis would be remiss if it failed to probe the possible forms of resistance which community college students exhibit toward the school's assignment of their position in the labour process. the research concerns posed above coincide with many of the questions which have been generated by the "new sociology of education" and methods which have predominated in research being carried out within this perspective may be borrowed. qualitative approaches aimed at uncovering elements of the curriculum which assist in the reproduction of the division between mental and manual labour would have great utility in addressing these questions empirically. this would entail lengthy observations in classrooms in order to assess the content of the curriculum as it relates to the labour process, its mode of presentation and the student response to it. further insight could be gained through informal discussions with students, instructors and administrators. without doubt, such a research programmatic would demand tremendous resources of time and commitment from investigators. in this way, much could be learned, however, not only about the role played by the school in the reproduction of the division between mental and manual labour, but also about the wider ideological processes in which the community college is immersed. alternate routes vol. 5 1982 notes various authors point to the fact that community college students are recruited from lower income and education groups than are students in universities. in addition, the positions which community college graduates eventually occupy in the work world are inferior to those of university graduates in terms of prestige and financial reward. canadian data on the background characteristics of university and community college students show a similar trend for canada (pike, 1980:130; porter, porter and blishen, 1979; dennison et al.,1975). supplementary to the family background data, a statistics canada (clark and zsigmond, 1981) report on 1976 postsecondary graduates confirms that community college graduates command lower salaries than their university trained counterparts. it should be stated at the outset that the nature of community colleges varies by province in canada. some community colleges offer only terminal career programs (ontario) while others offer a mixture of terminal programs and programs which may be continued or transferred to studies at universites (british columbia, quebec'. at the same time, community colleges have in common a non-degree granting status. for more detailed accounts of the diversity of community colleges in canada, consult martin and mcdonell (1978:28-32) and harvey [1973:57-60). see karabel and halsey's (197") review of theoretical work in the sociology of education, where the tenets of technological functionalism and other competing theoretical perspectives in the sub-discipline are delineated . several other american educational theorists have posited similar versions of bowles and gintis' 'correspondence principle" (behn, et al. ,1976; carter, 19"6; levin, 1976). it is interesting to note that they draw attention to the fact that the carnegie commission on higher education in the united states has had a significant impact on the patterning of the community college system in the united states. their insinuation is that capital's interests have been represented in the development of policy on community college education. they also note, as has karabel (1977), that the needs of capital in the area of curricula are represented on an ongoing basis by members from local business communities on community college advisory boards. paul willis' (1977) important british study gives empirical support to this contention. 161 7. in some instances, it is difficult to separate the hidden and overt curricula, since both have the ability to impart norms and values. for example, mcdiarimid and pratt (1971) have demonstrated that the presentation of canadian history in elementary schools (which would be identified as part of the overt curriculum) has often encouraged negative values and beliefs about trade unions, racial groups, and certain political systems, etc. 8 advocates of this perspective prescribe a sociology of education which takes as problematic "what counts as educational knowledge and how it is made available" (young, 1971: 2) . although much of this work focuses on classroom knowledge as negotiable between teachers and students and has been faulted for failing to take into account the external structural constraints on the school (sharp and green, 1975 : 16 -35) , it has stimulated research in the area of curriculum. for a review of the major theoretical positions of the "new sociology of education" see hum (1976). 9 this remark must be qualified with the acknowledgement that we may question how well the education system prepares individuals. collins (1979) has argued persuasively that the education system is less efficient as a training ground for workers than on-the-job training. he contends that workers must supplement their educational training with much practical work experience before they become successful at their work. 10. braverman (1974:114) notes that the designation "separation of conception from execution" and "the separation of mental and manual labour" are roughly equivalent. however, he favours the use of the "separation of conception from execution" since it applies not only to the removal of conception (brain workl from the work of those who perform manual labour (hand work), but also to mental labour itself. 11 in making use of poulantzas' concept of the division between mental and manual labour it is not imperative to accept his theorizing on the determination of class boundaries in toto. for example, wright (1978a:53) questions the validity of using the division between mental and manual labour as the ideological determinant of class boundaries when there are many forms of ideological domination in the labour process. notwithstanding this reservation, wright (1978b : 196-197) concurs that the division is an important form ot ideological domination. 12 poulantzas suggests that it is not appropriate to think of the division between mental and manual labour in 162 terms of "clean jobs" and "dirty jobs", and reminds us that no work can be conceived of as totally devoid of a mental or intellectual component (1978:325,254). 13. see shapiro (1980) for an excellent exposition of the major insights of poulantzas on education. 14. in one of his last essays, john porter (1979:263-280) cites braverman's analysis of "the degradation of work in the twentieth century". porter noted that the education system has spawned an "elite" of highly educated experts whose university training places them in a powerful position in production. in spite of the inflated qualifications needed to procure positions under the experts, porter suggested that many of these subordinate roles involved routinized work that really required little training. while he hesitated to lay the blame on the technical division of labour unique to capitalism, porter was andamant in his assessment that our esteem for credentials represented a misplaced respect that contributed to inequality in access to material privileges and input in the shaping of future society. 15. the statistics canada report grouped all non-university postsecondary graduates under the category of "colleges" (clark and zsigmond , 1981 : 38) . included in this grouping were graduates of colleges of applied arts and sciences, community colleges, institutes of technology, and all other postsecondary institutions which do not offer degree programs (e.g. surveying, agriculture, and nursing schools). the term "college" is equivalent to the term "community college" used throughout this paper . 16. american writers have recognized other features of the community college which are inferior to the university in the united states (zwerling , 1976 ; aronowitz , 1973 : 90-91). these authors call attention to the disparity between the two types of institutions with regard to the funds at their disposal for physical and cultural resources, and point to a cultural poverty of community college campus life. 17. french (1981:87-89) gives a brief overview of canada's system for training technicians and technologists. 18. in ontario, community college instructors are required to have work experience in an area other than teaching. 19. for a more comprehensive list of similar courses of instruction available at the community college level in ontario see horizons 1981/82 (ontario ministry of colleges and universities, 1981:10-17). 163 references apple, michael, w. 1979 ideology and curriculum . london: routledge and kegan pau 1 . 1980 "the other side of the hidden curriculum: correspondence theories and the labour process." interchange , ll(3):s-22. aronowitz, stanley 197 3 false promise: the shaping of american worjcing class consciousnesti new york: mcgraw-hill book company. behn, william h. et al. 1976 "school is bad; work is worse" .martin carnoy and henry m. levin (eds) , the limits of educational reform . new york: david mckay company, inc . : 219244. bleasdale, graham 1978 "towards a political economy of capitalist educational values". randle w. nelson and david a. nock (eds), reading, writing and riches: education and the socio-economic order in north america . toronto : between the lines:ll-39. bowles, samuel and herbert gintis 197 6 schooling in capitalist america: educational reform and the contradictions of economic li f e . new york: basic books inc. braverman, harry 197 4 labour and monopoly capital: the degradation of work in the twentieth century . new york: monthly review press. carter, michael a. 1976 "contradiction and correspondence: analysis of the relation of schooling to work.", martin carnoy and henry m. levin (eds) , t he limits of educational reform . new york: david mckay company, inc . : 219244 . clark, burton r. 1962 educating the expert society . san francisco: chandler publishing company. clark, w and z. zsigmond 1981 job market reality for postsecondary graduates: employment outcome by 1978, two years after graduation"! ottawa: statistics canada . 164 clement, wallace 1981 hard rock mining: industrial relations and technological change at inco . toronto: mcclelland and stewart limited . collins, randall 197 9 the credential society: an historical sociology of education and stratification . new york: academic press. dennison, john d. et al. 197 5 the impact of community colleges: a study of the college concept in british columbia . vancouver : btc. research. french, h.w. 1981 engineering technicians: some problems of nomenclature and classification . paris :unesco . gorlick, sherry 1977 "undermining hierarchy: problems of schooling in capitalist america." monthly review 29(5): 20-36. gorz, andre 1976 "technology, technicians and class struggle." andre gorz fed), the division of labour: the labour process and class struggle in modern capitalism . sussex: the harvester press limited: 159-189. harp, john 1980 "social inequalities and the transmission of knowledge: the case against the schools." john harp and john r. hof ley (eds) , s tructured inequality in canada . scarborough, ontario: prentice-hall of canada: 219-246. harvey, edward 1974 educational systems and the labour market toronto : longman canada limited. hurn, christopher j. 1976 "recent trends in the sociology of education in britaid." harvard educational review 46(1): 105-114. 1978 the limits and possibilities of schooling . boston: allyn and bacon, inc. karabel, jerome 1977 "community colleges and social stratification: submerged class conflict in american higher education." jerome karabel and a.h. halsey eds), power and ideology in education .new york: oxford university press: 232253 . 165 karabel, jerome and a.h. halsey 1977 "educational research: a review and interpretation." jerome karabel and a.h. halsey (eds) , power and ideology in education . new york: oxford university press: 1-85. levin, henry m. 1976 "educational reform: its meaning?" martin carnoy and henry m. levin (eds) , the limits of educational reform . new york: david mckay company, inc . : 23 51 . martin, wilfred b. and allan j. macdonell 197 8 canadian education: a sociological analysis scarborough, ontario: prentice hall of canada ltd. mayes, sharon s. 1977 "the increasing stratification of higher education: ideology and consequence." the journal of educational thought 11 f 1 ) : 16-27. mcdiarmid, garnet and david pratt 1971 teaching prejudice . toronto: ontario institute for studies in education. ministry of colleges and universities 1981 horizons 1981/82 . toronto: ministry of colleges and universities . pike, robert m. 1980 "education, class, and power in canada." richard ossenberg (ed) , power and change in canada . toronto: mcclelland and stewart ltd. 1981 sociological research on higher education 1970-1980: a review of some main" themes in the english language literature . paper presented at the annual meetings of the canadian society for the study of higher education, halifax, nova scotia. pincus, fred 1978 "tracking and community colleges." randle w. nelson and david a. nock (eds), reading , writing and riches .toronto : between the lines:171-211. 1980 "the false promises of community colleges: class conflict and vocational education." harvard educational review 50 (3) : 332361 . 166 porter m.r. and j.porter and b.r.blishen 1979 does money matter? toronto: macmillan of canada . porter, john 1979 the measure of canadian society: education , equality, and opportunity"! toronto : gage publishing limited. poulantzas, nicos 1978 classes in contemporary capitalism . london: verso . shapiro, h. svi 1980 "education and the state in capitalist society: aspects of the sociology of nicos poulantzas." harvard educational review 50 (3) : 3 21 -331"! sharp, rachel and anthony green 197 5 education and social control: a study in progressive primary education . london: routledge and kegan paul. schecter, stephen 1977 "capitalism, class and educational reform in canada." leo panitch (ed) , the canadian state . toronto: university of toronto press: 373-416. white, robert 1980 "knowledge and power: determinants of educational curriculum." alternate routes 4:53-85. willis, paul 1977 learning to labour . westmead, england: saxon house. wright, erik olin 1978a class, crisis and the state . london: verso. 1978b "intellectuals and the class structure of capitalist society." pat walker (ed) , between labour and capital. montreal: black rose books: 191 -211. young, michael r.d. (ed) 1971 knowledge and control: new directions for the sociology of education" london: coll i ermacmillan publishers. zweling, l.s. 197 6 second best: the crisis of the community college . new york: mcgraw hill. sr embourgeoisement or proletarianization? stan marshall society as a whole is more and more splitting up into two great hostile camps, into two great classes directly facing each other; bourgeoisie and proletariat. * marx and engles' proposition that the system of capitalist relations would inevitably result in a polarization of the two main classes the bourgeoisie and the proletariat is and has been under considerable debate. the rise of a new middle class which appears to be located between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat has sparked speculation that the expected polarization of the class structure would not occur. the debate, of course, centres around whether there are any processes in operation which will have such a polarization as its end result. two theoretical propositions have been advanced. the first, the proletarianization thesis, asserts that the old and new middle classes are being drawn into the proletariat or working class. the second, the embourgeoisement thesis, argues that the upper levels of the working class are being assimilntcd ir.to an ever increasing ndo'dle class. this paper will endeavour to examine critically these two hypotheses in order to determine the merits of each in studying the class structure of capitalist societies. in order to accomplish this task it is necessary to allow for the examination of society at the level of production relations as well as at the level of distributive relations. more specifically, the aims of this paper will be (1) to identify the 59 processes of embourgeoisement and proletarianization in terms of their operation in capitalist society, (2) to determine the coniposition and location of the "new middle class", and (3) to formulate a basis from which to look at the middle classes of modern capitalist society in order to determine if there has been or will be a significant change in the class structure. before this can be accomplished, it is necessary to look at both proletarianization and embourgeoisement in order to determine the emphasis of each thesis. at first glance, it appears that these propositions are polar opposites. however, it is not the case when one looks at the arguments at different levels of analysis. as will be 2 3 seen later on, g. carchedi and harry braverman both attempt to look at the proletarianization of the middle classes from the level of the economic substructure and changes in the relations to the means of production. on the other hand, the embourgeoisement thesis is primarily concerned with changes in the superstructural elements resulting from a change in consumption patterns and life styles within the working . 4 class. embourgeoisement has as its major focus the perceived increasing affluence of the western working class." these changed material conditions and increased opportunities for workers are seen as resulting in a general homogeneity of lifestyles and values. in other words, the traditional working class is seen as developing middle class lifestyles. the argument rests on the increase in the affluence of workers and the perception that material conditions are better for western workers today 60 than they have ever been at any other time. these improved conditions are seen as being paramount in stifling any development of a working class consciousness. thus the cmbourgeoisement process is seen as operating upon the traditional working class in a manner which has changing material conditions resulting in changing values and lifestyles. proletarianization has as its major focus the economic or objectiveconditions which perpetuate the traditional working class and adds to its number by forcing segments of the middle class to become working class. these segments are proletarianized only in an economic sense i.e., their economic identification is with the working class. this does not mean that at any given point in time, their values or behaviour will be the same as production workers. g. carchedi is one author who recognizes that a proper class analysis must take into account all the analytical components. there is no autoratic correspondence between the economic identification of classes and their definitions. this is so because classes must be defined in economic, political and ideological terms. ^ the proletarianization process is seen as operating upon the middle classes in a manner in which the economic (objective) identification of the middle class is changed. once the economic condition is changed we can expect a corresponding change in the superstructural elements. it is recognized that changes in the political and ideological spheres are not necessarily immediate. however, at its limit, the proletarianization process will result in the middle classes "becoring proletariat". 6: it is clear that proletarianization is not necessarily opposed to the embourgeoisement thesis. its basis does not rest entirely upon the assumption that workers are becoming less affluent. proletarianization refers to a structural transformation in the relation of the worker to the means of production. the embourgeoisement thesis, on the other hand, rests upon the assertion that workers are becoming more affluent and is concerned mainly with distributive relations. one area where the two theses tend to make opposite projections is in the development of a working class consciousness. proletarianization supporters claim that changing economic conditions set the stage for a rising working class consciousness while embourgeoisement supporters claim that the material affluence of workers militates against the development of a working class consciousness. these are questions worthy of examination but due to the limited scope of this paper, they can be touched upon only superficially here. it is now necessary to examine each of these processes individually. embourgeoisement the thesis of working class embourgeoisement in its simple formulation is no longer in fashion. but its political corollary has come in again by the back door, with these newer and more sophisticated interpretations of the situation of the "affluent worker". 8 the studies concerning the "affluent worker" that are the most well known are those of john goldthorpe, david lockwood, f. bechhofer 9 and j. piatt at luton in britain. these authors set out to determine if workers are becoming "bourgeois". the locale which they chose, they believed to be one in which the conditions would lead to the 62 embourgeoisement of the workers. for goldthorpe ctal . , the test to prove embourgeoisement would be to prove that the acquisition of incomes and living standards by manual workers similar to white collar workers would lead to the adoption of a new social outlook and new social norms that are middle class. the acquisition of this new outlook and these new norms would then have to lead to an acceptance of the manual worker by the middle class on the basis of equality. in this way it was to be a stiff test of the embourgeoisement thesis. goldthorpe et al . concluded that the affluent worker is not becoming bourgeois but is becoming a new type of worker whose work is no longer central to his life and whose orientation is "instrumental". this "instrumental" worker is concerned primarily with making money which he can spend on his family. in other words, his "outside of work" activities become his central life interest. goldthorpe et al . , call such a worker the privatized worker and as such he is not middle class. however, this privatization militates against collective organization by the worker and in this way hinders the development of a class consciousness. privatization does not preclude militancy or radical action but it does decrease the probability that radical action ... 11 will occur. j.h. westergaard criticizes these studies from both a theoretical and methodological viewpoint. his main criticism is that the authors of these studies do not recognize that the workers' monetary orientation to the job is remarkably similar to marx's "cash nexus". marx rccog12 nized this "cash nexus" as the binding force in capitalist society. 63 the interpretation of these studies ...underplays evidence [strikes, industrial sabotage, work stoppages] to indicate the precariousness of the balance between attitudes of cooperation and "societal resignation" on the one hand, and on the other hand those conflicting attitudes involving a generalized social discontent which may be released once the single .stranded "cash orientation" becomes strained or broken. 1* in other words, at any one point in time, the workers may be cooperative and resigned to the workings of the existing society but the cooperation and resignation does not preclude the possibility of action resulting from the"continuing conflict once the cash nexus is broken. although goldthjrpe etal . , make a case for the inaction of the working class, their case is not strong enough to say that workers are becoming bourgeois. in addition, their argument is not strong enough to say that becoming affluent or privatized, eliminates the possibility of some radical action in the future. for while the affluent workers' ' "instrumental" orientation to work militates against any radicalization stemming from his employment situation, new and more radical demands may well be engendered by the clash between steadily rising aspirations and the barriers to their achievement in the world outside work. 14 in addition to the possibility of action resulting from the strain on the cash nexus, there is also a possibility of action resulting from the inability of the system to maintain and increase the workers desire for individual upward mobility. if these aspirations are stifled then m the potential for radical action may be stimulated. up to this point, the possibility of such events taking place are mostly speculative based upon a few isolated labor disputes which have resulted from similar conditions. however, sucli a possibility cannot be dismissed offhand. an integral part of the affluence thesis is that blue collar or manual workers' incomes are converging with those of white collar workers. this convergence results in increased consumption by the working class from which results a corresponding identification with the middle class. richard hamilton points out that people tend to assune that there was a wide gap between manual and non-manual incomes in the past and that the tendency today is for incomes to converge and overlap. hamilton disputes this convergence. he maintains that those workers viewed as well-off are in those families in which there is more than one wage earner and that the pattern of work for families of nonmanuals is different from that of families formed by manual workers. affluent working class families are not like equivalent middle-class families. the majority of well off working-class families achieve "affluence" through a greater expenditure of effort. 1° there are several other differences between so called affluent working class families and rriddle class families. for example, in middle class families, wives and children are more free from work. in this sense, the determinants of income for middle class are linked to the head of the family's job and career; while working class "affluence" is dependent upon the wife's job and career. in other words, the wife's 65 income auguments the husband's and accounts for the "extras" that the family may buy. one can see that the expenditure of effort in the working class family is significantly different from that of the middle class family. the acceptance of the idea that incomes are converging i.e., that manual wages are increasing, provides the basis for a theory of general satisfaction in society. however, there are some misconceptions about 18 increasing incomes. hamilton notes three in particular: (1) the frame of reference is usually past experience, therefore people perceive that their wages are increasing. they are perceiving an absolute increase as opposed to a relative increase. (2) incomes estimates are often based on hourly rates of pay and people assume full employment at that specific rate. however, they do not consider that many jobs which have high hourly pay rates are not jobs which guarantee year round employment. in many fields, construction for example, year round employment is a rarity. (3) the third misconception is related to the first in that there is a perceptual distortion due to continuing inflation. for example, the minimum wage keeps increasing. people remember when the minimum wage was much lower and draw a conclusion that incomes are increasing. this is obviously true in absolute terms but is questionable when viewed in relative terms. due to the increasing incomes (in absolute terms), living standards are also assumed to be increasing for the working class and converging with the middle class. hamilton measured living standards 66 in terms of home ownership and automobile ownership, tie found that the ip lower middle class " and the working class shared a similar life condition, that is, a lower percentage own homes in comparison to the upper middle class and the homes that they do own are less expensive. similarly, the upper middle class are significantly differentiated from the lower middle and working classes in automobile ownership. the ability to buy new cars varies directly with social class. hamilton concludes that convergence in income and consumption theses are not well founded. it might appear from hamilton's work that there is some convergence between the lower middle class and the working class. associated with this is a problem of definition and identification of 20 the middle class. related to ha-i.ilton 1 s work and corroborating it to some extc.t is 21 the work of andrew l.evison. he purposely sets out to dispel some of the myths associated with the embourgeoisement thesis. he attacks the 22 assumption that the majority of americans are white collar workers by pointing out inaccuracies in the census categories researchers use to determine the number of people who make up the white collar or blue collar ranks. he notes especially two instances (1) the lumping of large numbers of clerical and sales occupations into white collar categories and (2) the contention that service categories are something other than blue collar. by rectifying these two situations, he estimates that 60°. of america is in the working class. a second myth which lcvison attacks is the myth that blue collar workers earn as much as white collar workers. his procedure for 67 determining this is directly related to the work of richard hamilton. he corrects tor inaccuracies in categories used to show the distribution of income. his conslusion is that the working class earns less. related to the distribution of income is the condition of lifestyle. the myth maintains that blue collar lifestyle is similar to white collar lifestyle. levison dispels this by noting differences in the lifestyles of working class and middle class families especially in the location of working class areas vis a vis middle class areas. he makes a valid criticism of this myth by saying that the working class and the middle class very seldom come into contact with each other. in other words, the working class are not being assimilated into the middle class. he elaborates by looking at community life. blue collar life is permeated 23 by economic insecurit) and a lower quality of life. in other words, the blue collar worker is not "affluent" in that he does not have job security. in addition the "affluence" of the blue collar worker often refers to the ability to buy a house. it is questionable whether being able to meet such an essential need as shelter constitutes "affluence". there is also a problem of comparability in that working class communities tend to have less expensive homes and their neighborhoods are seldom given the priority that middle class communities are given with regard to services or development. even the educational system which was to have opened up opportunities for the working class has failed to do so. there have been many studies documenting middle class bias in the school system, discrimin24 ating against working class children. at the same time higher ' education has become more universal, the educational requirements for jebs (even manual jobs) have shifted upwards. coincident with this, there are not enough jobs available for those who have a university education. in other words, an increase in education has not resulted .-. ar. increase in opportunity within the upper and middle levels of the occupational structure. obviously, this paper has not taken the position that the workers arc becoming bourgeois. it supports the position that the working class has not decreased and has not become more affluent relative to other segments of society. it is optimistic that the working class is becoming more aware of their objective class condition and that the potential for radical action is reflected in high absenteeism, shoddy vcrkr.ar.ship, sabotage, use of drugs, periodic refusals to accept the authority of the foreman, strikes, increasing incidences of rejecting settlements, wild cat strikes, and challenges to incumbent union leaders. in this sense, the working class is alive and retaining its revolutionary potential. up to this point, the discussion has revolved around the embourgec:?ercr.t or "affluent worker" thesis. as mentioned at the beginning of this paper, the central focus of the embourgeoiscment thesis lies in the distributive relations in society. this fact is obvious in light of the works discussed here. although they formulate an effective refutation of the embourgeoiscment thesis, the works of hamilton and levison tend to be descriptive rather than explanatory. they tend to focus upon a descriptive account of the distribution of surplus in b9 society rather than those factors which underly changes in the class structure. moreover, to refute embourgeoisement is not to illustrate proletarianization for the two, as i have argued, are not cecrpletely antithetical. with this in mind, it is now necessary to turn to the proletarianization thesis. proletarianization one of the main obstacles to a study of proletarianization has been an inadequate understanding of the class position of those v«hc appear to be in contradictory class positions. this lack of understanding of the class position of the middle classes has led to the criticism that the process of proletarianization is inadequately or improperly defined. in other words, if the criteria for placing individuals in the middle class are not clear, then it is impossible to understand how any process could lead to a deterioration of that class position. however, the work of g. carchedi has gone a long way to identifying the class location of those who seem to be neither wholly in the bourgeoisie nor wholly in the proletariat. harry braverman also acknowledges that this is a problem and both he and carchedi come to a similar type of conclusion. the most important problem in locating the "middle class" is not that they are a class unto themselves but that they take on characteristics from both the bourgeoisie and the proletariat. braverman comes to the conclusion this way. the complexities of the class structure of pre-monopoly capitalism arose from the fact that so large a proportion of -o the working population, being neither ecployed by capital not itself employing labour to any significant extent, fell outside the capital-labor polarity. the complexity of the class structure of modern monopoly capitalism arises from the very opposite consideration: namely that almost all of the population has been transformed into employees cf capital . ^5 this quotation suggests that it is necessary to make a distinction between the "old" riddle class and the "new" middle class. the old middle classes are the petite bourgeoisie the small businessman and the independent commodity producers. the new middle classes are the managers and supervisors. for braverman the old middle class is neither bourgeoisie nor proletariat because they lie outside the dominant relations of production i.e., capital-labor-polarity. on the other har.d, the new middle clas: is situated between capital and labor. their class location becomes difficult to define because they are both manager and worker. ...there is a range of intermediate categories, sharing the characteristics of worker on the one side and manager on the other in varying degrees.-^ implicit in this statement is a recognition that managers and workers carry on different functions and that there is a group of people who are both manager and worker. as such, they must carry out the functions of both these positions. carchcdi makes it very clear that there is a definite distinction between the old and the new middle class. his conclusion is similar to braverman's in that the new middle class seems to be both bourgeoisie and proletariat. however he introduces specifically that component which we extrapolated implicitly from 71 braverman the idea that functions are important in determining class 27 position. carchedi's main contribution to the controversy surrounding the middle class and whether this sector of the labor force is being proletarianized, is the introduction of the two functions the function of global capital and the function of the collective worker . it is necessary to try to understand exactly what carchedi means when he speaks of these two functions and how they enable us to understand the economic identification of the middle class. it is unnecessary to go through the rather lengthy and complex derivations of these definitions as given by carchedi. instead the definitions will be borrowed as he finalizes them. . . . to perform the function of the collective worker means to take part in the capitalist production process as a whole ... from the point of view of the labour process and thus of the surplus labour producing process . conversely, to perform the global function of capital means to take part in the capitalist production process as a whole exclusively from the point of view of the surplus labour producing process . ^ put more simply "there will be those who will collectively perform 29 the labour process and those who will supervise". returning to the distinction between old and new middle class, carchedi makes his distinction very clear. the old middle class (1) owns (legally and economically) the means of production, (2) performs the function of capital and the function of the collective worker, (3) is laborer and non-laborer and (4) is exploiter and exploited. -: however, carchedi maintains that at the level of production relations, the role of ownership is dominant over the functions performed and thus the old middle class belongs to the capitalist class. however, in the monopoly stage of capitalism, the function of capital becomes the global function of capital which can be performed by agents outside the capitalist class. these agents are the new middle class and are characterized by (1) not owning (legally or economically) the means of production, (2) performing the global function of capital and the function of the collective worker, (3) being laborer and non-laborer and (4) being exploiter and exploited. _ thus the differences between the new middle class and the old middle class according to carchedi are substantial. the old middle class perform the function of capital individually while the new rr.iddle class perform, the function in conjunction with the capitalist and with other members of the new middle class. in the old iriddlc class the function of capital is always dominant but in the new middle class either the global function of capital or the function of the collective worker could be dominant at any given time. these are the key points to understanding the new middle class. ...that the new rr.iddle class performs the global function of capital even without owning the means of production, and that it performs this function in conjunction with the function of the collective worker, is the basic point for an understanding of the nature of this class. 32 carchedi claims that the new middle class can perform the two functions (not simultaneously) in varying degrees. the range is from performing exclusively the function of global capital to performing any combination 73 of the two functions. any definition of proletarianization formulated at this point must be composed of two elements (1) a change in function performed and (2) a devaluation of labor power. from a completely economic standpoint, proletarianization for carchedi becomes ... . the limit of the process of devaluation of the new niddle class ' labour-power, i.e., the reduction of this labour-power to an average un skilled lev'fl coupled with the elimination of the global function of capital . -^ the phenomena which are associated with proletarianization (lower level of living, unemployment, lowering of lifes' conditions degradation of the work process etc.) are manifestations of the devaluation of labor power in conjunction with the stripping away from the new 34 middle class of the global function of capital. carchedi makes one final remark which is central to understanding the process of proletarianization. it is a remark which relates to the beginning of this paper where it is noted that proletarianization has a different focus than embourgeoisement . it was not«d that the analysis may focus on the economic, the political or the ideological. proletarianization is generally focused on the economic while the embourgeoisement thesis is generally focused on the political and the ideological. carchedi makes it clear that the processes operating in this limited sense will not be sufficient to change the definition of a class. ...we should be careful not to confuse proletarianization with "becoming proletariat". the former term only refers to the economic sphere which, as we know, is not enough to classify groups and strata within one or another class. khen the "4 process of proletarianization has been completed we have only the objective conditions for a certain stratum to become part of the proletariat. there are, however, also political and ideological conditions which must be met before that stratum or group will actually become part of the proletariat . 35 kith this in mind, we can see that any definition of proletarianization taken from carchedi will be limited exclusively to the economic sphere and will give us only one dimension to examine in trying to ascertain any changes in the class structure. this is not a criticism of the excellent work carchedi has done, but is a plea for a more comprehensive definition of proletarianisation at both the political and ideological levels as well as at the economic level. as mentioned pr»viously, carchedi has opened up a new avenue in the research of proletarianization by introducing the two functions. previous research, especially that done by leo johnson and harry braverran has provided some empirical substantiation of the devaluation of labor power in canada as a condition of becoming proletarianized. however, further research is needed in the area to determine if there are changes in the functions performed by the middle class in canada i.e., changes in the balance of functions performed as described by carchedi. the devaluation of labor power is adequately documented in many places in harry draverman's book labor and monopoly capital . he highlights the processes of change in the economic sphere which had a resultant change in the objective identification of workers. the introduction of samuel taylor's techniques allowed the capitalist to extract far greater surplus value from the worker than ever before. 75 the advancement of technology allowed the capitalist to usurp control of the work process from the worker. it separated the worker from the conception and planning portion of the labor process. increasing division of labor in the workshop further removed the worker from engaging in the entire production process. thus the worker was further degraded. braverman indicates that the same processes were occurring in the offices of the capitalist enterprise. the clerical workers were undergoing a process of change as well. the meaning of "clerk" has changed in the transformation from early capitalism to monopoly capitalism. in carchedi's terms, office workers have had the global function of capital removed from them. many office jobs are no longer associated with management but with manual labor and have been mechanized in order to increase efficiency. the clerical portion of the new middle class is becoming increasingly proletarianized. ...the process in the course of which the body of salaried employees becomes a mass group rests on the successful attempt to replace the personal experience of the individual by a rational scientific business administration, so that an increasing proportion of the workers can be changed without danger to the efficiency of the enterprise... the salaried employees as a whole are being subjected to a process of decreasing social esteem. 37 an excellent example of this process is documented by joan greenbaum in monthly review , "division of labor in the computer field". in this article she documents the rise and fall of computer related occupations. 76 in a short twenty-year span, work in the computer field has been transformed by capitalism to suit its needs, through carefully planned division of labor. °° greenbaun; describes this rise and fall as the degradation of a technical work force into a "white collar assembly line where control of knowledge 39 in concentrated" in addition to the down grading of skills, the situation outlined by joan greenbaum also highlights another consequence of the process of the increasing division of labor. this consequence is the formation of a surplus labor force as there is an increasing centralization of computer companies. the centralization compounded the other consequences by continuing the lowering of wages and by further reducing task definitions. the end result seems to be ...lower salaries relative to the cost of living, expansion of clerical like jobs, and a shift away from computer specialists. technological skill has been removed from all but a handful of workers. 40 it seems obvious from the foregoing discussion that the devaluation of labor power is integral to any definition of proletarianization and so we must accept it as part of the definition used here. it is necessary to make a distinction between proletarianization as it affects the "old middle class" as opposed to how it affects the "new middle class". because of the differences between the two segments of the ciddlc class, proletarianization is going to have a different consequence for each. according to the definition of proletarianization at the econoric level, there must be a devaluation of labor power plus a change in the function performed i.e., a shift from the global function of capital towards the function of the collective worker. however, the proletarianization of the old middle class would have to entail an elimination of the function of capital and thus an elimination of that occupational grouping. this is necessarily so because in the old middle class the function of capital is always dominant as they own the means of production. the shift away from employment classified as petite bourgeoise in this century would be an indication that this proletarianization is taking place. the decreasing proportion of the income allocated to the petite bourgeoisie is another indication and is a factor involved in the elimination of those ei7iplo>nient sectors. leo johnson documents the decline of the petite bourgeoisie in canada. this decide is illustrated in a drop in their relative numbers from 14.7* of income earners in 1£ms to 10.9% in 196s. in addition the petite bourgeoisie have become relatively more impoverished in terms cf income during that period. the petite bourgeoisie income as a percentage of the average income decreased from 120% in 1948 to 94* in 41 1968. this decline occurred for both the small independent commodity producer, especially the small farmer, and the small independent businessman, although for each of these subgroups the decline was at different rates. we have already documented the tendency of capitalism to erode the new middle class and now we see an even more startling erosion of the old middle class. thus far the paper has dealt with the emphasis of both the cmbourgeoisement and proletarianization theses. in doing so it has highlighted 7fi and refuted the embourgeoiserr.cnt thesis as being an inaccurate and incocplete assessment of the changing class structure. this paper has accepted the proletarianization thesis as being infinitely more amenable tc erpirical research which would allow for a complete and indepth analysis of the class structure. the cmbourgeoisement thesis is deficient in that it concentrates on the distributive relations and the superstructural elements in society. this deficiency is a fundamental one in that it neglects changes in the production relations and it is these changes which are determinant and dominant over changes in 42 the superstructure. conversely, the proletarianization argument uses this as its very starting point. if any criticism can be made of this approach, it is that it rarely progresses past this starting point i.e., it is concerned alirost entirely with the economic level of analysis. khat needs to be developed is a more comprehensive definition and cxaminaticn of proletarianization which would account for the political and ideological levels as well. basically the conclusion which must be reached at this time is that it is an erpirical question as to whether the formation of the ''new niddle class" is a class with middle class characteristics or a class with traditional working class characteristics. either way, the most appropriate way to analyze it is to prove or disprove the increasing deterioration cf the old and new niddle classes in conjunction with the contir.ui:.^ proletarian condition of the traditional working class. khat follows is a \ery brief outline of how this may be accomplished. as mentioned earlier the new and old middle classes have to be 79 treated somewhat differently. a deterioration in the old middle class will be detected by an absolute decrease in the percentage of the population making a living in the petite bourgeois occupations. however, this in itself is not sufficient in that a corresponding increase must be found in occupations which are traditionally working class or are devalued new middle class occupations. in this way there must be a change over time in the occupational groupings. there are several indicators which can be used to detect these changes. the devaluation of occupations can be tested by analyzing the income (including benefits) changes over time. a devaluation in labor power will lead to corresponding devaluation in income of that group relative to the incomes of other occupational groupings. this analysis could be used to check the embourgeoi sement thesis as well by checking the incomes of traditional working class occupations relative to other occupations. another aspect which has to be examined in the changing class locations of occupations is the innovation of technology. it is necessary to look at how diversified jobs have become as a result of the implementation of technology. the result could have either of two consequences (1) routinization i.e. a more complex job is broken down into two or more additional, more routine, less skillful jobs or (2) technological rationalization i.e. several jobs are brought together into one job which does not demand as much skill as the original jobs. either way, it is an indication that the labor power of those performing the jobs has been devaluated. the most obvious consequence should be a reduction in the relative income of those occupations. 80 not unrelated to the above is the degree of unemployment in occupational sectors. rationalization of jobs due to technological change can result in large numbers of unemployed. before an occupation is devalued there should be a high demand for workers in that area. as devaluation takes place the supply of workers capable of filling devalued positions should outstrip the demand. therefore, an indication of devaluation should be a large number of unemployed who are qualified to work in that occupational sector. other variables which have to be considered include trade union activity, male-female occupations, and education and experience. the trade unions could have the effect of obscuring some of the obvious differences in income differentials. at the same time, increased trade union activity in o:cupational sectors where there has been little activity previously may be an indication that the workers are becoming aware cf the deterioration of their position. it matters not whether the activity is a result of their becoming proletarian or a reaction against their becoming proletarian. the same obvious indicator, increased trade union activity, is still there. the sexual differentiation among occupations is important in looking at proletarianization. one must determine whether occupations with a high proportion of female manpower are more prone to deterioration than those with mainly male manpower or whether women are drawn into jobs where the deterioration process has already begun. the amount of experience and education required for performing jobs must be analyzed to determine if there is a deterioration of these qualifications in certain sectors relative to other sectors. bl the brief discussion given above states some of the factors which may be examined in a study of the devaluation of labor power. however, if one follows carchedi's definition, then the functions which the agents perform must be analyzed as well. in this case the operationalization is somewhat more difficult. the function of global capital may be related to the work of supervision and control. the function of the 43 collective worker occurs when the agent takes part in the labor process. if over any two time periods the function of the job shifts from that of global capital to that of the collective worker then the occupation is becoming more proletarian. in order to research this type of change it is necessary to look at such variables as (1) supervisory duties of the job and (2) the amount of control over other employees the job requires. obviously the investigation of the changes occurring in the middle classes is an exceedingly difficult and imposing task. this task has been touched upon only very superficially in this paper but it is a topic worthy of much more intensive scrutiny. 82 notes 1. marx, karl and frederick engels. the communist manifesto , new york: international publishers, 1st published 1s48. p. 9. 2. carchedi, g. "on the economic identification of the new middle class" in economy and society , 1975. 3. braverman, harry. labor and monopoly capital , monthly review press 1974. 4. these superstructural elements are the political and the ideological. 5. the embourgeoisement thesis was most popular in the 1950s and 1960s. some of its major proponents were kurt b. mayer, class and society , new york: random house, 1955; ferdinand zweig, the worker in an affluent society , london: heinrmann, 1961; and gerhard lenski, power and privilege , new york: mcgraw-hill, 1966. 6. g. carchedi op. cit . p. 59. 7. the difference between "proletarianization" and "becoming proletariat' will be expounded upon later in this paper. 8. kestergaard, j.h. "the rediscovery of the cash nexus" in socialist register , 1970, p. 113. 9. this study is published in three volumes. (1) the affluent worker : industrial attitudes and behavior , cambridge university press, 19t8, (2) the affluent worker: political attitudes and behavior , 1966 and (3) the affluent worker in the class structure , 1969. 10. goldthorpe, j.h. et.al . the affluent worker in the class structure , 1969, p. 24. also see j.h. westergaard. op. cit . p,113~ 11. studies conducted by k.g. runciinan, relative deprivaticn and social justice , 1966 and r.t. mckenzie and a. silver, angels in marble : working class conservatives in england , 1968 lend support to the conclusions of goldthorpe et.al . pertaining to the development of the working class. workers are described as "secular and pragmatic" "instrumental ly oriented" and "privatised". 12. j.h. westergaard. op.cit . p. 120. 13. ibid , p. 121. 14. ibid , p. 132. 83 15. hamilton, richard. class and politics in the united states , new york: wiley, 1972, p. 378. 16. ibid , p. 369. 17. ibid , p. 371. 18. ibid , pp. 380-381. 19. by using this type of designation for classes, hamilton differs soirewhat from the conception of classes used in this paper. a more fully developed definition of class will be attempted later in a discussion of the middle class which is integral to the proletarianization thesis. however, for the purposes of illustrating the problems of the embourgeoisement thesis, hamilton's concept of class can be accepted here. 20. harry braverman, op . c i t . and g. carchedi, op . c i t . address themselves to this problem and lend support to the thesis of proletarianization of certain segments ofthe middle class. 21. levison, andrew. the working class majority , new york: coward, mccann and geoghegan, inc. 1974. 22. levison uses strictly american data gathered from the u.s. cer.: us and the dept. of labor statistics. 23. see also richard sennett and jonathon cobb. the hidden injuries of class , new york: vintage books, 1973. 24. for example, see marion r. porter, john porter and bernard blishcn, does money matter? prospects for higher education , toronto: institute for beharioral research, york university, 1973. 25. harry braverman, op . c i t . p. 4 04. 26. ibid , p. 405. 27. andre gorz, in an earlier article "technical intelligence and the capitalist division of labor" in telos , 1972, points out that functions are important in the process of capital accumulation. ...we shall not succeed in locating technical and scientific labor within the class structure of advanced capitalist society unless wc start analyzing what functions technical and scientific labor perform in the process of capital accumulation and in the process of reproducing capitalist relations, (p. 27). gorz's statement, although it is speaking specifically of scientific and technical orployn.ent , could be applied to all these middle levels of employment which seem to be both proletariat and bourgeoisie. s4 johnson, leo. "the development of class in canada in the twentieth century" in gary teeple (ed.) capitalism and the national question ir, canada , university of toronto press, 1972. 37. harry braverman, op . c i t . pp. 350-351. 38. grecnbaum, joan. "division of labor in the computer field" in monthly review , vol.28, july-august, 1976, pp. 40-55. see also john and barbara ehrenreiih, "hospital workers: a case study in the 'new working class'" in monthly review , vol.24, *8, jan. 1973. 39. ibid , p. 41. 40. ibid , p. 42. 41. leo johnson, op. cit . p. 148, table 1. these figures are for the total petite bourgeoisie. also harry braverman, op. cit . notes these same changes in the occupationsl structure especially in the drastic reduction in the proportion of the population engaged in agriculture. 42. the political and ideological can react back upon the economic in a form of overdetermination. however, they react back upon the economic only within the limits set by the economic substructure. 43. this may be either productive or unproductive work. both carchedi op . cit . and leo johnson op. cit . allow that non-productive workers can be part of the working class and thus perform the function of the collective worker. however, nicos poulantzas, "on social classes" in new left review , 1973 assigns non-productive workers to the middle class specifically on the grounds that they are unproductive. thus for both carchedi and johnson the proletarianization of non-productive workers in the middle class is possible without changing their unproductive nature, while for poulantz.is this proletarianization is not possible save for a change from unproductive work to productive wor> . ss bibliography braverman, harry, labor and monopoly capital, monthly review press, 1974. carchedi, g. "on the economic determination of the new middle class" in economy and society, 1975. ehrenreich, john and barbara. "hospital workers: a case study in the 'new working class"" in monthly review , vol.24, #8, jan. 1973. goldthorpe, j.h. ct . al . the affluent worker: industrial attitudes and behavior , cambridge university fress, 1968. goldthorpe et.al . the affluent worker: political attitudes and behavior , cambridge university press, 1968. goldthorpe et .al . the affluent worker in the class structure , cambridge university fress, 1969. gorz, andre. "technical intelligence and the capitalist division of labor" in telos , 1972. greenbaum, joan. "division of labor in the computer field" in montnly review , vol.28, july-august 1976. hamilton, richard. class and politics in the united states , new york: wiley, 1972. johnson, leo. "the development of class in canada in the twentieth century: in gary teeple (ed.) capitalism and the national question in canada , university of toronto press, 1972. lenski, gerhard. power and privilege , new york: mcgraw-hill 1966. levison, andrew, the working class majority , new york: coward, mccann and geoghegan inc. 1974. marx, karl and frederick engels. the communist manifesto , international publishers, 1st published in 1848. mayer, kurt b. class and society , new york: random house, 195s. mckenzie, r.t. and a. silver. angels in marble: working class conser vatives in urban england , chicago: university of chicago press, 1968. porter, marion r., john porter and bernard blishen. docs money matter ? prospects for higher education , tctonto: institute for behavioral research, york university, 1973. 86 runciman, k.c. relative deprivation and social justice , berkeley: university of california press, 1966. scnnett, richard and jonathon cobb. the hidden injuries of class , vintage books, 1973. kestergaard, j.h. "the rediscovery of the cash nexus" in socalist register , 1970. zweig, ferdinand. the worker in an affluent society , london: heineman, 1961. | 99 power, the state and global politics after the great freeze:towards a new articulation? randall germain1 introduction in the social sciences, scholarly disciplines can be prompted to re-evaluate the analytical traction of their central concepts by abrupt changes in how the object of their scholarship is organized. the disciplines of international relations (ir) and international political economy (ipe) have long faced such pressure. for example, some see the interwar years and the great depression as the precursor not only to the empirical development of american hegemony, but also as a key spur to the emergence of realism as a central method of apprehending power (carr, 1946; schmidt, 1998; cox, 2000). several decades later, scholars took the breakdown of the bretton woods system as a prompt both to re-evaluate the utility of realism as a theoretical lens for ir and ipe, and as a signal that the post-war structure of the global political economy was itself entering a period of ‘after hegemony’, to use the title of a significant text from that era (keohane and nye, 1977; keohane, 1984). this last debate over american decline of power was seemingly resolved in the closing years of the 20th century, amid the aftermath of the end of the cold war, the collapse of the soviet union and the re-assertion of american power (cox, 2001). the uni-polar era had arrived even as governance was becoming increasingly globalized (scholte, 2000; ikenberry, mastanduno and wohlforth, 2009). the financial crisis of 2007-2009 has brought this paradoxical resolution into question. the central features of the crisis include both domestic and international dynamics: regulatory failure among leading 1  randall germain is professor and chair of the department of political science at carleton university (ottawa, canada). he is the author of global politics and financial governance and the international organization of credit: states and global finance in the world-economy. he can be reached at: randall_germain@carleton.ca power, the state and global politics after the great freeze: towards a new articulation? 100 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times financial powers (most critically the united states (u.s.) but others as well); financial innovation among banks, investment banks and nonbank financial institutions that built up significant systemic risk; macroeconomic imbalances at the global level that included trade and capital account disequilibria alongside currency misalignments; inappropriate monetary policies; high sovereign debt loads; and ultimately massive institutional failure. i have elsewhere labelled this crisis the great freeze, because one of its principal consequences was a steady constriction of credit markets from the summer of 2007 that ultimately resulted in a near total blockage–or flash freeze–after lehman brothers went bust in september 2008 (germain, 2010). the twelve months following this spectacular bankruptcy saw the harshest contraction of global economic activity since the worst days of the great depression. indeed, 2009 is the only year since 1945 that the global economy as a whole has been in recession (imf, 2009). this article uses this crisis as the occasion to explore the changing global articulation of power. power in ir and ipe is usually viewed in relational terms, as the ability to effect change in actor’s behaviour, where actor a gets actor b to do what it might not otherwise would (baldwin, 2002; schmidt, 2005). power here is understood as the capacity–derived most often from control over material capabilities that translate into instruments of pressure–of one actor to influence (directly or indirectly) the decisions of another actor. in contrast, i deploy an understanding of power that is more structural in orientation, derived from the work of susan strange, who argues that it is the structural determinants of power that are more important to understand than the relational determinants (strange, 1988b). on this basis, strange disagreed with those who, in the mid-1980s, viewed the global political economy to be entering a period marked by american decline (strange, 1987). the argument i advance below takes it cue from her framework to argue that the new global articulation of power suggested by the great freeze is both highly fluid and relatively opaque or ambiguous. this is so because even as some key structural determinants of power have become hollowed out, other elements remain intact while yet more have yet to emerge fully. the result will be a period of struggle waged around and through the principal organizational pillars of the global political economy for control over the very foundations of political order. the outcome of this struggle will not be resolved any time soon. | 101 power, the state and global politics the idea that we can measure power in global politics has long been attractive to scholars, even as they have acknowledged the immense difficulties of the task (knorr, 1975; kirshner, 1995; hardt and negri, 2000; andrews, 2006). here i wish to follow the british ipe scholar susan strange in asking how changes in the structural determinants of power help us to understand select contemporary trends. strange developed her understanding of power against prevailing views, largely american in origin, that saw in the 1980s a sharp and steep decline in the ability of the u.s. to shape the international economic order. at the time, ir and ipe scholars were concerned primarily with the ability of the u.s. to compel its long-time allies to follow american preferences and accommodate themselves to american interests as they had for much of the bretton woods period. from across the theoretical spectrum, this was most often articulated as the erosion of international regimes, whose main cause was a decline in american power (block ,1977; gilpin, 1981; krasner, 1983). in contrast, strange argued that such measurements of american power were at the very least inaccurate, and at worst entirely misleading (strange, 1983; 1987). she noted that even as the share of american gross domestic product (gdp) in relation to global gdp had declined, the control of american corporations over key international markets remained high and was even (in certain industries such as services) growing. for strange, the key question was not the weight of the american economy in the global economy, but the control exerted by american corporations and lawmakers over global markets (strange, 1988; cf nizan and bichler, 2009). here she pointed out that this control was not under threat from global competition; in fact, global competition was defined and shaped inexorably by the demands, preferences and resources of american corporations. in short, the structure of global competition was determined (or controlled) by american interests, even if these interests were themselves no longer expressly related to the territorial borders of the u.s. she sometimes styled these interests in the form of a ‘transnational’ or ‘american’ empire’ (strange, 1988b; 1989). it was this structural capacity to control the global economic agenda which counted in the power sweepstakes, not where widgets were actually produced. and such power at its heart was constituted by a complicated amalgam of public and private authority. at one level, for strange, the global articulation of power in the 1980s was constituted by an iron triangle of inordinate (american) military power, an inter-state system that refracted and radiated america’s govpower, the state and global politics after the great freeze: towards a new articulation? 102 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times ernmental power throughout its most important elements, and the dominance of an ideational framework that privileged american principles and ideals. here strange disagreed with two of the strongest proponents of the argument that america was no longer ascendant. from a realist perspective, robert gilpin argued that american power, measured as its ability to compel its allies to make contributions to the pax americana, was in terminal decline (gilpin, 1981). and from a critical historical materialist perspective, robert cox argued that the u.s. was no longer able to direct a hegemonic structure of world order (cox, 1987). both gilpin and cox, albeit for quite different reasons, pointed to the inability of the u.s. to fashion consensus or accommodate its allies’ needs as part of the negotiations necessary to maintain a benevolent (from an american point of view) global economic system. for them, a neo-liberal (or hyper-liberal, to use the term initially coined by cox) world signalled the end of american dominance. strange had a different answer to the question of american decline, relying instead on a careful distinction between relational and structural power. relational power was of course above all about the u.s. being able to coerce or compel its allies and competitors to undertake particular courses of action. here she acknowledged that this form of power waxed and waned with global economic circumstances, and was entirely dependent upon very specific and particular contexts. on this reading, from the early 1970s until the late 1980s it did appear that u.s. relational power was in retreat. the instrumental capacity of the u.s. to exert its willpower seemed to have eroded, or at the very least to be under severe stress.2 however, what was significant for strange’s counter-intuitive analysis was the capacity of some states to set the rules by which others would have to play the ‘great power’ game. in other words, for strange the key to understanding who actually ‘had’ power lay not in determining who could prevail in specific decisions, but who could set the rules by which such decisions were made in the first place (strange, 1988b). in her estimation at the time, it was still american political leaders who had it within their grasp to provide such leadership. even though not all decisions went america’s way, they were made under american rules that reflected american interests. this social fact also called attention to the global reach of american domestic political conflicts, which had a disproportionate impact on international regulatory developments. beyond 2  for strange, however, this decline in relational power was predominantly caused by u.s. domestic politics, by an inability on the part of the american political system to organize itself effectively so as to project and use its (structural) power appropriately (strange, 1987). | 103 this, there were also some decisions that were simply not taken because the u.s. in effect blocked the way; such ‘non-decisions’ as she called them were also the product of american structural power (strange, 1986). in strange’s view, this ability to set the rules derived from several sources, some public or state-centred and some centred more in the operation of the (capitalist) economic system. the american state still maintained a considerable military edge over its closest rivals, which was bolstered by the continued reluctance of european states to devote adequate resources to defending themselves. but equally importantly, american corporations continued to dominate transnational production systems, which were a principal source of high value profits. the superior innovative capacities of these firms, bolstered by statesponsored military research, bestowed onto certain segments of america’s ‘private’ economy an unalloyed competitive advantage. as well, american ideas about how to organize economic activity (and its associated set of political values and ideals) complemented these advantages, and held a global appeal. and finally, and for her critically, the u.s. (through its government, its markets and its private institutions) had a lock-grip over the organization and operation of the world’s monetary and financial system (strange, 1987; 1988; cf may, 1996). for strange, all that was required for america to actually exercise its structural power was a willingness to act politically in a manner congruent with its underlying power capacities.3 this understanding of power ties together the capacity of the state with the operation of private institutions and the inter-state system to provide for strange a structural reading that suggests where power actually resides in the global political economy. because power is about the capacity to decide agendas, it is not directly related to the ability of a to compel b to undertake a particular course of action; rather, it is related to the context of agency, which has two levels: (1) the capacity of a to convince b that its menu of choice involves x, y and z and nothing else; and (2) the capacity of a to influence this menu of choice either directly, through its own ability to compel the acceptance of the menu, or indirectly, because the majority of the elements of the menu remain in a dependent relationship to a. this kind of power, which she called structural power, belonged as a property to the u.s. throughout the period of supposed american decline. to highlight the exercise of such power, strange (1988b) considered the example of the international debt crisis of the early 1980s, when several countries ran into significant debt repayment problems. instruc3  by the end of her life, strange had finally concluded that the u.s. was in fact unwilling to act in a manner congruent with its own ‘structural’ interests (strange, 1998). power, the state and global politics after the great freeze: towards a new articulation? 104 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times tively for her, only those countries with close ties to the u.s. were able to work towards a resolution that involved creditors booking losses on their assets within the framework of an overall imf-sanctioned debt recovery scheme. crucially, it was the u.s. which was able to dictate these rules of engagement, and it was these rules which all indebted countries had to follow if they wanted debt relief on a multilateral scale. american power here was omnipresent but structural, reflecting its pole position within the inter-state system rather than a calculated exploitation of its own instrumental power. strange’s view of structural power–and indeed power in general–is not of course without problems, many of which are connected to her idiosyncratic view of theory in ir and ipe. some of these are noted in a volume dedicated to engaging with the corpus and legacy of her work (lawton, rosenau and verdun, 2000). we could, for example, take her to task for developing taxonomies rather than theoretical insights (cohen, 2000); for not working through the tension in her work between materialism and idealism (guzzini, 2000); for failing to overcome the de facto analytical barriers between economics and politics (cutler, 2000); and for refusing to socialize adequately her fundamentally empiricist reading of knowledge, ideology and ultimately power itself (tooze, 2000). what these critiques of strange’s view on power suggest is that she offers an insightful but yet truncated conception of power, which only partially connects the foundations of power to the way in which it is exercised. most importantly, strange seems oddly reluctant to reflect theoretically on her insights, and determined to restrict her theoretical reflections to the terrain of empirical falsification. this is perhaps due to her ambiguous acceptance of the place of positivism within the social sciences, and to her ultimate unwillingness to modify its evidence-based evaluative precepts (may, 1996; palan, 1999; cutler, 2000; tooze, 2000). even with these caveats, however, her conception of structural power offers a useful framework to consider how the global articulation of power has been affected by the great freeze. this is because it directs our attention to two key developments: (1) the changing role of the state in regulating financial markets; and (2) the rise of emerging market economies and their new role in setting the agenda of global economic decision-making. on both counts, what emerges from such a consideration is a recognition that established patterns of decision-making are unravelling, even if new patterns have yet to be firmly established. each development will be reviewed below. | 105 power and the state: financial regulation the key authorities involved in global financial regulation are american and european officials together with their counterparts in international regulatory institutions. this should not be surprising, as historically these states sit astride the world’s deepest and most liquid financial markets. what is noteworthy from the perspective of considering the effects of the great freeze is to observe how systematically these states are moving forward to intervene more forcefully in the operation of financial markets under their jurisdiction. states are renewing their authority to set the agenda of global finance. in the u.s., two major directions of change are developing: in the organization and logic of supervision; and in the range and extent of supervision. each of these regulatory changes will increase the degree of state intervention in its financial system, and thereby encourage other states to intervene more forcefully in their financial systems. the first major change concerns the organization of financial supervision and in particular the question of whether such supervision should be sectoral or unified in scope and scale. while the u.s. may be an extreme case with its plethora of financial regulatory bodies, the logic of sectoral supervision has a considerable historical record (russell, 2008).4 the great freeze has brought into sharp relief how problematic such a fragmented regulatory apparatus is when set within the context of an integrated set of financial markets. here the great freeze has unquestionably tipped the balance in favour of a more strongly unified supervisory framework. in the u.s., the obama administration’s efforts to recalibrate u.s. financial regulation have resulted in the passage of the dodd-frank bill, which among other things identifies the federal reserve board (fed) as the principal overseer of systemic risk. a combined council of regulators will further close many of the remaining gaps within the u.s. system. equally important are new powers given to regulators to wind-up insolvent firms, and to compel banks to limit or restrict their proprietary treading units under the so-called volcker rule. this rule prescribes how banks are to capitalize their special investment vehicles, and how much they are allowed 4  financial markets have historically been differentiated by the kinds of instruments that comprise them and their institutional makeup. regulation has evolved in line with how these markets operate and what kinds of products they generate. this has traditionally been understood in terms of key pillars, most importantly banking, equities, insurance and pensions. almost everywhere each pillar has spawned its own regulatory apparatus, together with a few more recent developments such as organized futures markets. see germain (2010) and porter (2005) for an historical account. power, the state and global politics after the great freeze: towards a new articulation? 106 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times to invest in hedge funds and private equity firms. together with the vetting powers which the new consumer protection agency will have for financial instruments, the dodd-frank bill will push the government to cast a much heavier footprint over the organization and operation of the american financial system.5 a heavier footprint is also taking shape in europe, where british and e.u. authorities are moving to give the state a much stronger presence within their respective financial systems. in the u.k., a major reorganization of financial supervision has been undertaken to strip the financial services authority of its supervisory role and to relocate it within the bank of england.6 this has been further supported by the recommendations made by an independent commission struck by the new british government to examine how to strengthen the british financial system in light of the great freeze (economist 2011: april 16th–22nd). this commission–known as the vickers’ commission–has recommended that british banks organize themselves to insulate or ring fence their domestic u.k. retail arms from their investment and commercial banking operations. in other words, the (british) state looks set to intervene more forcefully in how financial institutions active in the u.k. are actually run. similar albeit weaker trajectories are underway in the e.u.7 of course, none of these developments have yet to be fully implemented as of the time of writing of this manuscript, and there are some who doubt that their impact will be as argued here. such scepti5  other provisions in the ‘wall street reform and consumer protection act’ include bringing all major financial institutions–whether bank or non-bank–within the purview of federal regulation, more closely regulating derivatives trading and hedge funds, limiting the proprietary trading prerogatives of banks, and providing the federal government with a more clearly specified way of closing down insolvent financial institutions. see http://www. opencongress.org/bill/111-h4173/show (accessed august 6th, 2010). 6  among the proposals published by the british government in july 2010 were to return both macroand microprudential supervisory responsibilities to the bank of england, and to create a new consumer protection agency to absorb the institutional responsibilities of the financial services authority (which will effectively be gutted). these proposals arise out of the turner review–the official enquiry into how the uk’s supervisory arrangements failed to contain the fallout from the great freeze–as well as the political preferences of the conservative and liberal-democrat partners in the new coalition government. see http:// www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/other/turner_review.pdf (accessed may 04, 2009) and http://www. hm-treasury.gov.uk/consult_financial_regulation.htm (accessed august 06, 2010). 7  the e.u. struck a high-level committee to examine the crisis and how to respond to it, chaired by jacques de larosière, a former managing director of the imf who also played a leading role in preparing the e.u. for monetary union. in addition to proposing e.u.-wide risk and supervisory councils, this panel recommended reviewing accounting standards and basel ii (especially its capital adequacy requirements), tighter regulation of derivatives trading and the shadow banking system, and the harmonization of deposit insurance schemes on an e.u.-wide basis. see http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/finances/docs/ de_larosiere_report_en.pdf (accessed on july 29, 2009). | 107 cism however should be treated with caution, for two reasons. first, across europe and the u.s., banks have been recapitalized and are being forced to hold much more capital in relation to their lending and proprietary operations than prior to 2008. swiss banks, for example, are being compelled by their government to hold nearly 20% capital buffers whereas prior to 2008 they were capitalized at nearer to 7%.8 the british and dutch governments are arguing strenuously with the e.u. that they should be allowed to impose higher capital requirements than the new basel iii rules. here, minimum tier 1 capital ratios are being raised from a pre-crisis requirement of 4% to at least 7%, with a further tranche of easily accessible capital at 3%. furthermore, somewhere between 20 and 30 globally-active financial institutions are about to be categorized by the basel committee on banking supervision as ‘systemically important financial institutions’, or sifis, which will need to hold extra capital buffers above and beyond normal operating guidelines of between 1.5-2.5%, due to their perceived systemic importance. no one should doubt that increased capital ratios, which influence how much banks can lend, are on the way, and that these will have an impact on banking operations. it is through the mechanism of increased capital ratios that major banks are having their activities more closely supervised, and similar consequences are in train for other regulatory developments.9 the second reason why sceptics should be cautious relates to the politics of financial regulation. for much of the post-war period, financial regulation in the rich economies has been debated and conducted in a kind of segregated, insulated bubble, removed for the most part from popular (and democratic) pressures (helleiner, 1994; strange, 1998; porter, 2005; wood, 2005; germain, 2010). this is no longer the case. from the tea party phenomenon in the u.s. to the role played by populist and nationalist political parties in scandinavia in addressing the 2010-2011 european debt crisis to the refusal of icelandic voters to sanction an imf bailout, financial supervision and the politics of finance have moved to centre stage in national politics. and while this development has yet to fully play itself out, all indications are that the relatively insulated nature of financial politics has for the moment become impossible to maintain (thirkwell-white, 2009). 8  see http://online.wsj.com/article/sb10001424052748704631504575531222507779044.html (accessed october 15, 2010). 9  a summary of the basel iii can be found at http://www.bis.org/press/p100912.htm (accessed october 15, 2010). power, the state and global politics after the great freeze: towards a new articulation? 108 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times and yet a word of caution is in order. the state that is at the centre of this reassertion of authority is not itself entirely distinct from private authority. in all three jurisdictions examined here, private financial institutions have over the 1990s won a strengthened degree of involvement in the debate over how the financial system should be regulated. in the u.s. this is because of the porous and fragmented nature of the american political system, which has long been open to lobbying efforts from private firms. in the u.k. this is because of the historic ties between the city, the exchequer and the bank of england, and the single-minded determination of successive governments to maintain london’s role as a leading international financial centre. and in the e.u., although the influence of the private sector is not as strong as in the u.s. or u.k., it has grown over the years due to the sheer increase in the weight of financial affairs in the overall economy of europe, as well as the organizational efforts of europe’s leading banks to lobby on their own behalf in brussels (underhill and zhang, 2008; king and sinclair, 2003). geoffrey underhill (2000) is surely correct to note that there is a growing condominium between state and market in today’s global political economy. here, it is helpful to follow susan strange’s understanding of the intimate relationship between public and private forms of authority, as she recognizes that this relationship is part of a continuum whose balance changes over time. in her last major publication, she argued that markets and private authority had outrun state authority to the point where only an almost complete collapse of confidence in the capacity of private authority to effectively organize global finance could catalyze state authorities to reassert their traditional grip on financial systems (strange, 1998, p. 190). this collapse came upon us in 2008, when it fell to public authorities alone to stem the tide, which was estimated by one respected analyst to cost nearly us$14 trillion (haldane and alessandri, 2009). so, while the precise nature of the new balance between public and private authority has yet to be stabilized, there should be no questions about the direction of change: in each of the world’s major financial markets, the role of the state is being up-scaled, with the result that state authority is being re-articulated to exert more structural power over how financial markets are organized. we may say that the agenda-setting capacity of the state has been re-asserted over financial markets, even if this reassertion is uneven and subject to private sector push-back. | 109 power and the state system: emerging market economies and the balance of power many scholars and commentators have observed that global politics, understood primarily through the lens of the inter-state system, has been in a period of transformation (e.g. jacques, 2009; halliday, 2009). on the debit side of this ledger is the weakening grip of western powers, symbolized by the economic troubles of the u.s. on the credit side of this ledger are the emerging market economies, symbolized most importantly by the rise of the bric countries but including other non-g7 countries whose economies and international profiles have been growing rapidly. for these countries the early years of the 21st century have at last brought dynamic economic growth and public sector reform that has enabled them to acquire the material vestiges of real power: their economies have hummed; their trade has skyrocketed; their companies have gone global; their reserves have been bolstered; and their armies have become better equipped. in short, enough emerging market and other non-g-7 economies have grown in relation to the historically-powerful countries that talk of a new and emerging international balance of power is warranted. following from our earlier analysis, however, we can ask whether scholars are not committing the same analytical error that strange reprimanded her peers for making over two decades ago? a critical example is the accumulation of international reserves by the bric countries, which is often considered a key barometer of the growing power of emerging market economies. for strange, this would be a clear example of how structural power works, because the stockpiling of foreign currency reserves denominated in u.s. dollars confirms three important features of american structural power: (1) america still has the world’s confidence as the pre-eminent provider of global liquidity; (2) there are at this time no serious rivals to accumulating and using u.s. dollars as an international reserve currency, even if those accumulating such reserves complain about the injustice of it; and (3) whereas bric and other countries have to earn their liquidity (which are what such reserves represent), america can simply create its liquidity. it is hard to think of a better indicator of structural power than this, what strange (1987, p. 569) in her own time called super-exorbitant privilege. nevertheless, since 2009 chinese officials (often but not always supported by other bric countries) have stepped up calls for the development of a non-dollar-denominated international reserve currency unit. what would be needed for such a development to occur? on the governpower, the state and global politics after the great freeze: towards a new articulation? 110 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times ment side, it would require holders of large dollar-denominated reserves to make their own currencies completely convertible in order to allow for their use abroad as trade and investment vehicles. in other words, emerging market economies such as china, russia, india and brazil need to liberalize their current and capital accounts to the point where others will have the necessary confidence to diversify into these currencies and use them as genuine reserve currencies. as these governments tighten their hold on undesired movements of capital into and out of their economies (as indeed many emerging market economies are doing), such a possibility seems more remote today than at any time in the past twenty years.10 indeed, one only has to look back to the experience of japan during the 1980s and its antipathy towards internationalizing the yen to understand the deep political forces that constrain governments which otherwise might challenge existing reserve currencies.11 but on the private or market side of the equation the forces supporting the continuing use of the u.s. dollar are equally powerful. private firms and market actors demand not just that governments relinquish control over currencies in order that they may be used for purposes dictated by the interests of private accumulation, but also that there be ample liquidity in order that the temporary use of a currency (as a store of value, for example) does not become a permanent and unwanted longterm investment. for this condition to obtain, governments need to adopt a liberal view of their currencies, most importantly by freeing their use abroad and by abjuring their use as a developmental tool. there also needs to be an adequate supply of the currency in question. absent suitable liberalization and an ample supply, private firms and markets will not have the confidence to use a currency (or facilitate its use), and will therefore minimize how they employ it. 10  over the past two years, countries including china, south korea, singapore, brazil and turkey have joined russia and india to implement controls on the inflow of capital as an important tool in the battle to protect their economies from currency appreciation and, to a lesser extent, over-heating. these controls are now supported by the imf, which has shifted its long-standing blanket opposition to capital controls. see for example http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/11/business/global/11capital.html?_r=1&ref=business (accessed december 5, 2010). 11  the basic problem faced by a country possessing an international reserve currency is that it loses its ability to hold onto direct control of its exchange rate, and thereby the ability to use its currency as a developmental tool. by its very nature an international reserve currency is widely dispersed and intensely traded, and this compromises the ability of its issuing government to control its value. of course, there are significant advantages to the issuer of an international reserve currency, most importantly the ability to fund its government’s activities cheaply because of the international demand for its government bonds (which are the chief component of international reserves). to most developing and emerging market countries, however, the benefits of issuing a reserve currency are far outweighed by the disadvantages, hence their reluctance to allow their currency to act as such. | 111 and this is where we are in 2011 with respect to the future of the american dollar as an international reserve currency. many countries (and not just bric countries) are uncomfortable with the international role of the u.s. dollar. by making it cheap for the u.s. to fund its budgetary and current account deficits (what economists often call seigniorage), using the dollar as the international reserve currency retards the adjustment process the u.s. needs to undertake to bring its trade, current and capital accounts into a more sustainable balance. it also prolongs the vulnerability other countries experience with respect to having to follow or react to america’s monetary policies. yet, the world is not rushing out to adopt the rouble or the rupee or the yuan as reserve currencies, simply because they cannot. and neither can they freely use the pound sterling, japanese yen, swiss franc or, most significantly, the euro. there are simply not enough of the former to be thrust into this role, while the political mismatch between the issuance of euro-denominated debt and who controls its value ultimately means that an enormous question mark hangs over precisely how robust an international role the euro can play. by default, the dollar will be required for use as an international reserve currency until well into the middle decades of the 21st century.12 so, the accumulation of a mountain of u.s. dollar-denominated reserve assets by bric and other countries such as japan does not prima facie indicate the decline of american power. in relational terms, to return to susan strange’s argument, it may indeed appear that the u.s. now has serious rivals to its monetary power. however, in structural terms, its challengers are hobbled by the framework of practices that have developed over the past decades that have been entirely cantered on american interests and needs. the u.s. has held a firm grasp on monetary and financial power since 1945, and this has allowed it to build up 12 the problems of the euro zone in 2010-11 have clarified how significant the political mismatch is in europe, possibly dealing a fatal blow to a global role for the euro. two developments could conceivably undermine the future role of the u.s. dollar. one development might be a genuine budgetary (and therefore political) crisis in the u.s., involving both default and devaluation. if this happens all bets are off. the august 2011 downgrade u.s. debt by standard and poor’s sets up an interesting confrontation between the u.s. government and american credit rating agencies in this respect, but it is difficult to see quite what the practical outcome of this move will be, since a large part of these agencies’ role in the global financial system derives in part from their explicit (american) government sanctioned role in rating government and private debt (sinclair 2005). moreover, it is difficult to identify america’s budgetary woes as a ‘debt’ problem when in fact its effective tax rate is less than 25% of gdp, well below the oecd average of 35%. the other development might be the development of sdrs into a kind of proper international reserve currency. even if this were to happen it would still not address the needs of private firms and market actors for an internationally-tradable currency, which an sdr is most manifestly not. international reserve currencies need to be accepted and used by both public and private agents; this accounts for how difficult they are to establish as well as why they take so long to fade. power, the state and global politics after the great freeze: towards a new articulation? 112 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times an historic reservoir of influence and power that will not be easily dislodged.13 yet, the balance of economic power has not been entirely static over the post-war era, and even though american firms and indeed the american government together constitute a significant element of the world’s monetary and financial system, they are not as ubiquitous an element as they once were. the u.s. has been to a certain extent decentred from the structure of financial governance over the past decade and a half, so that even though it is still an immensely powerful actor it must now negotiate the framework of this structure with other actors and their concerns (germain, 2010). it is this political fact which marks out the salience of current governance developments, where the interaction of international political relations with the demands of regulatory change are generating a set of issues whose importance is both novel and potentially long-lasting. structural power and political order two important sets of long-term structural consequences have been set in motion. one set of consequences revolves around the role of the state in the global financial system. as states–in both the developed and developing economies–move to re-calibrate how they intervene in the organization and operation of financial systems, their centrality within the globalized structure of financial governance will grow. the nationstate is not simply important here because it is the instrument through which all regulation actually gets implemented. even more critically, it is the only institution which can generate financial regulation that is appropriate and suitable for its own economy. emerging market economies–and the bric countries in particular–will here take their cue from what the u.s. and e.u. states actually do to impose tighter regulations on financial institutions; a slightly less globalized financial system is most likely to be the outcome. this is so because higher capital requirements, more capital controls and more tightly circumscribed operating environments will inevitably generate a global financial system less hospitable 13  many of the themes canvassed in the above paragraphs can be found also in a recent volume on the future of the u.s. dollar (helleiner and kirshner, 2009). interestingly, the experts in that volume agree to disagree on the future of the dollar. | 113 to what i elsewhere describe as deep globalization.14 this does not mean that globalization as we know it is coming to an end, merely that there will be less of it going forward. we will move from a highly globalized world to a world in which the pull of the nation-state away from deep globalization is more clearly felt. intersecting with the strengthening of the state is the second set of consequences, namely the refashioning of the inter-state balance of power. we have seen how this works in terms of the role of the u.s. dollar as an international reserve currency: its role is being eroded and brought into question, yet with no alternative in sight. in other words, one of the critical foundations of political order for the global political economy is entering a period of intense uncertainty. we have not witnessed such a situation since the inter-war period. strange might have observed here that the structural power of the u.s. is changing only very slowly, while its instrumental power to shape decisions directly is increasingly haphazard, reflecting the volatility of circumstances (including significantly an increasingly unstable domestic political landscape). what is especially important at the current moment, however, is that the global economic decision-making agenda does not yet appear to have ceded substantial power to emerging market economies, despite for example their accumulation of enormous reserves of u.s. dollars. structural power remains asymmetrically concentrated in american institutions and subject to american rules. how much longer will this remain so? if we return to strange’s conceptual formulation of structural power, we can recall that it relied on american military dominance, the continuing dominance of american ideals and values, and the place of american financial institutions, markets and government in the global financial system. if these fundamental elements of the global political order become further constrained or even undermined, then those adopting strange’s position would have to concede that the structural power of the u.s. is weakening. what is the status of these elements of global political order? the u.s. continues to outspend the rest of the world combined on defence, and it continues to be the only state with the military capacity 14  deep globalization here refers to the intensity of liberalization efforts which have driven economic growth since the end of the bretton woods era in the early 1980s. globalization– understood as increasing levels of economic integration among major economies together with the emergence of a global political consensus organized around neo-liberal principles– has been sustained by the global reach of liberalization, and it is precisely this which is coming unstuck as a consequence of the great freeze. this theme is explored below and in some detail in germain (2010: ch. 6). power, the state and global politics after the great freeze: towards a new articulation? 114 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times to fight a two-front war. yet, its military might is no longer unrivalled, and the build up of military assets by china could be viewed by some as a significant challenge. but it must be acknowledged that the only potential military rival to the u.s. is china, and so long as european states continue to rely disproportionally on american security via nato it is unlikely that the military dominance of the u.s. will collapse any time soon. while the idea of a uni-polar moment may be overstating the case, we are in many respects well short of a genuine multi-polar inter-state system (ikenberry, mastanduno and wohlfarth, 2009). what should be of more concern to scholars of global power is the condition of american values and ideals, which support in so many ways the entrenched american-centred global economic agenda. here it is interesting that one of the consequences of the great freeze has been the severe questioning of liberalization as the default ideational template for global capitalism. there are still no serious alternatives to organizing the global economy along capitalist lines. what has changed, however, is the degree to which capitalism needs to be organized along liberal (or neo-liberal) lines. here liberalization as an ethos is now subject to two important charges: (1) it is unsustainable as a form of economic regulation; and (2) that state-organized capitalism is in fact more stable than liberal capitalism. and while neither of these charges are categorical or themselves without controversy, they have undermined the persuasive power of liberalization’s ideologues to spread their gospel. from europe to asia to latin america and africa, liberalism is in retreat, and this has undermined the ideational supports for the operationalization of american structural power. finally, the great freeze began in the u.s. financial system, even if it was aided and abetted by global forces and dynamics. has it also challenged the centrality of the american financial system to the global financial system? this question is difficult to assess at this moment in time. on one hand, even with the carnage wreaked by the great freeze, american financial markets remain the deepest and most liquid in the world. and while american banks and financial institutions no longer remain the world’s largest by many ratios, they continue to be among the most profitable and innovative, and equally important they continue to provide unparalleled access for foreigners to american capital markets. their centrality to the organization and operation of the global financial system will not soon disappear. and because both u.s. markets and financial institutions remain key components of the global financial system, so too does the american government. its image and halo may | 115 be tarnished and dented, but it continues to possess a definite and considerable weight in how the global financial system runs. this sets up an interesting scholarly debate between those, like myself, who now emphasize the extent of change in the landscape of global political economy, and those who remain impressed by the continuity of capitalist relations as the key factor that explains current trajectories. at one level this is a debate about the relative weight to assign to competing explanatory variables: are we focusing on state versus class; public versus private; or global versus national? at another level it is about the grounds of adjudication: does more regulatory control also mean that state authorities are somehow in ascendancy, when in fact the dividing line between public and private authority may be impossible to identify? and at still another level, it is about the means used to understand and verify the categories we are using: do we appeal to ‘evidence’ or ‘theory’ (‘beliefs’?) when it comes to establishing the fundamental basis of our arguments? there are no easy or clear answers to these questions; thus such debates will long maintain their traction. yet here again it is worthwhile to return to the work of susan strange, for she offers at the very least a way of negotiating some of the hurdles thrown up by these debates. for strange, who understood that there were several ways of apprehending all important events, the question of the significance of current changes would need to be addressed within the context of cui bono, or for whose advantage? this context almost always provides a clear causal chain to follow, even if the measurement of ‘advantage’ can be a bit messy. in the case of changes to financial regulation, it appears that the biggest beneficiaries of higher capital requirements, increased capital controls and less liberalization are states in general and major developed states in particular, because it is they who will have to spend less to bail out their financial institutions if regulatory reforms are successful. of course, private financial institutions should also benefit from these reforms, but the weight of advantage lies with states. similarly, the unevenness of the changes outlined above regarding the inter-state balance of power, while not directly challenging the structural power of the u.s., certainly begin to undermine the ideational core of that power. over time, this will have the effect of eroding from within the dominant position of the u.s. in the global political economy. it is for these reasons that i can argue that the global articulation of power within the global political economy is entering a period of power, the state and global politics after the great freeze: towards a new articulation? 116 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times uncertainty as established patterns of power erode and new patterns emerge unevenly. there is no question that the relational power of the u.s. is eroding: firms from emerging market economies are challenging american firms in some areas, while the ability of the u.s. state to dictate its preferences onto a pliant world no longer holds. at the same time, the agenda setting ability of american authorities, both public and private, has not entirely deteriorated, and in some areas remains substantial. this is what continues to generate america’s continuing structural power. the interesting aspect of this situation, from the perspective of scholars of ir and ipe, will be how it plays out over the medium term, when the economic and security capabilities of the u.s. seem to be moving in opposite directions. the prediction i would make in late 2011 is that as nation-states reassert their authority over their financial systems and intervene to blunt the advance of globalization, the entire fabric of the global political economy is becoming rebalanced, ushering in a new inter-state balance of power and a new era in the history of global politics that is no longer centrally defined by the hegemonic position of the u.s. references andrews, david m., (ed). (2006). international monetary power. ithaca: cornell university press. baldwin, david. (2002). “power and international relations,” in walter carlsnaes, thomas risse and beth a. simmons (eds.), handbook of international relations. london: sage. block, fred. (1977). the origins of international economic disorder. berkeley: university of california press. carr, e.h. (1946). the twenty years crisis. london: macmillan. cox, michael (ed.) (2000). e .h . carr: a critical appraisal. basingstoke: palgrave. ___________. (2001). “whatever happened to american decline? international relations and the new united states hegemony,” new political economy, 6 (3), 311-340. cutler, a. clair. (2000). “theorizing the ‘no-man’s-land’ between politics and economics,” in lawton, rosenau and verdun (2000). economist. london: various dates. germain, randall. (2010). global politics and financial governance. basingstoke: palgrave. gilpin, robert. (1981). war and change in world politics. princeton: princeton university press. | 117 ____________. (1987). the political economy of international relations. princeton: princeton university press. guzzini, stefano. (2000). “strange’s oscillating realism: opposing the idealand the apparent,” in lawton, rosenau and verdun (2000). haldane, andrew and piergiorgio alessandri. (2009). “banking on the state,” bis review, no. 139. accessed at www.bis.org/review/r091111e. pdf on november 17 2009. halliday, fred. (2009). “international relations in a post-hegemonic age,” international affairs, vol. 85, no.1: 37-51. hardt, michael and antonio negri. (2000). empire cambridge: harvard university press. helleiner, eric. (1994). states and the re-emergence of global finance. ithaca: cornell university press. ____________ and jonathan kirshner (eds.). (2009). the future of the dollar. ithaca: cornell university press. ikenberry, john g., michael mastanduno and william c. wohlforth. (2009). “unipolarity, state behaviour and systemic consequences,” world politics, vol. 61, no. 3: 1-27. imf. 2009 world economic outlook, july. washington: international monetary fund. jacques, martin. (2009). when china rules the world: the end of the western world and the birth of a new global order. london: penguin press. keohane, robert o. (1984). after hegemony: cooperation and discord in the world political economy. princeton: princeton university press. keohane, robert o. and joseph s. nye, jr. (1977). power and interdependence: world politics in transition. boston: little, brown. king, michael r. and timothy j. sinclair. (2003). “private actors and public policy: a requiem for the new basle capital accord,” international political science review, vol. 24, no. 3: 345-62. kirshner, jonathan. (1995). currency and coercion: the political economy of international monetary power. princeton: princeton university press. knorr, klaus. (1975). the power of nations: the political economy of international relations. new york: basic books. krasner, stephen (ed.). (1983). international regimes. ithaca: cornell university press. lawton, thomas, james rosenau and amy verdun (eds.). (2000). strange power: shaping the parameters of international relations and international political economy. aldershot: ashgate. may, christopher. (1996). “strange fruit: susan strange’s theory of structural power in the international political economy,” global society, 10 (2), 167-89. nitzan, jonathan and shimshon bichler. (2009). capital as power: a study of order and creorder. london: routledge. power, the state and global politics after the great freeze: towards a new articulation? 118 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times palan, ronen. (1999) “susan strange 1923-1998: a great international relations theorist,” review of international political economy, 6 (2), 121-32. porter, tony. (2005). globalization and finance. cambridge: polity press. russell, ellen d. (2008). new deal banking reform and keynesian welfare state capitalism. london: routledge. schmidt, brian c. (1998). the political discourse of anarchy: a disciplinary history of international relations albany: state university of new york press. ______________. (2005). “competing realist conceptions of power,” millennium, 33 (3), 523-549. scholte, jan aart. (2000). globalization: a critical introduction. basingstoke: macmillan. sinclair, timothy. (2005). the new masters of capital: american bondrating agencies and the politics of creditworthiness. ithaca: cornell university press. strange, susan. (1983). “cave! hic dragones: a critique of regime analysis,” in krasner (1983). ____________. (1986). casino capitalism. oxford: basil blackwell. ____________. (1987). “the persistent myth of lost hegemony,” international organization, vol. 41, no. 4: 551-74. ____________. (1988a). “the future of the american empire,” journal of international affairs, 42 (1), 1-17. ____________. (1988b). states and markets. london: pinter. ____________. (1989). “towards a theory of transnational empire,” in ernst-otto czempiel and james rosenau, eds, global changes and theoretical challenges: approaches to world politics in the 1990s. lexington: lexington books. ____________. (1998). mad money. manchester: manchester university press. thirkwell-white, ben. (2009). “dealing with the banks: populism and the public interest in the global financial architecture,” international affairs, vol. 85, no. 4: 689711. tooze, roger. (2000). “ideology, knowledge and power in international relations and international political economy,” in lawton, rosenau and verdun (2000). underhill, geoffrey r.d. (2000). “state, market and global political economy: genealogy of an (inter-?) discipline,” international affairs, 76 (4), 805-24. ____________________ and xiaoke zhang. (2008). “setting the rules: private power, political underpinnings, and legitimacy in global monetary and financial governance,” international affairs, vol. 84, no. 3: 536-54. | 119 wood, duncan. (2005). governing global banking: the basel committee and the politics of financial globalization. aldershot: ashgate. power, the state and global politics after the great freeze: towards a new articulation? 7 permanent austerity: the politics of the canadian exit strategy from fiscal stimulus bryan evans and greg albo1 abstract: this paper fills a gap in the analysis to date in examining the political context of canada’s fiscal stimulus rescue strategy and the subsequent turn to exit. the central question in canada, as everywhere else, has been who will pay for the economic crisis? canada’s federal and provincial governments have answered by signaling a sharp turn to austerity in targeting public sector workers and public services. while examples of resistance are noted, these remain far too limited to effectively challenge what is becoming a return to not just neoliberalism but a more authoritarian form at that. keywords: austerity, public sector, deregulation, fiscal crisis, since erupting across the world market in 2007, the global economic crisis has held political centre-stage in the core capitalist states. what began as a liquidity crisis in mortgage markets in the heartlands of neoliberalism in 2007 – the us, britain, ireland, and the baltic countries – quickly turned into an insolvency crisis in 2008, and the worst economic downturn since the great depression in 2009. although the downward spiral is now contained, economic stagnation continues in the central economies of capitalism – including canada – across 2010. indeed, there remain palpable fears of a further slide into economic recession in economic forecasts for 2011. and slow growth is projected for the foreseeable future. the centre of the economic turmoil has been the us, the driving force of the world economy over the last century. as a small open economy with an overwhelming trade dependence on the us, economic conditions in the us have been a crucial determinant of prospects for accumulation in canada. a register of key de1 bryan evans teaches public administration at ryerson university. greg albo teaches political economy at york university, and is co-editor of socialist register, and author of in and out of crisis (2010). permanent austerity: the politics of the canadian exit strategy from fiscal stimulus 8 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research velopments in the us (noted in us dollars below) is indicative of the breadth and depth of the financial crisis (imf 2010; office of management and budget 2010; realtytrac 2010; bloomberg 2009; ilo 2009; mckinsey 2008; crotty 2009). at the height of the us housing market bubble in 2006, a startling one-• fifth of new mortgages taken out are high-risk sub-prime loans, with total outstanding residential mortgages valued at over $10 trillion. but in 2007 things turned sour: foreclosure proceedings by lenders on mortgages increase by 79 per cent from 2006 levels on 1.3 million properties; they increase again by 81 per cent for 2008 over 2007 on 2.3 million properties; and in 2009, foreclosure notices on 2.8 million properties shatter records. into 2010, the numbers of mortgages either delinquent or foreclosed continues to climb. from a mid-2006 peak, us house values decline by one-quarter by sep-• tember 2008 at the peak of the financial turbulence– a stunning $15 trillion in asset value vanishing. in february 2007, hsbc, the world’s largest bank, is forced to write-down • $10.5 billion in us sub-prime loan backed securities. this begins a chain of write-offs and bankruptcies that will take down over 100 mortgage lenders in 2007. by 2008, the imf estimates that over $1.5 trillion of subprime mortgage-backed securities have to be written-off in a total market valued at over $7 trillion. in march 2008, the us government mandates the shotgun merger of bear • stearns with jp morgan at a meager $2 a share after trading at $170 per share only one year earlier. in september 2008, global inter-bank lending completely freezes up on • realization that the sub-prime mortgage meltdown is moving from the shadow banking system into the formal banking system risking complete financial collapse. as a consequence, in september 2008 the major us investment houses are • eliminated virtually overnight with the collapse of lehman brothers, the forced merger of merrill lynch into bank of america and the automatic regulatory conversion of morgan stanley and goldman sachs into commercial banks. 9 as well, in september 2008 the us government is forced to takeover aig, • the largest insurance company in the world with assets of some $1 trillion and a yearly turnover in the order of $10 trillion. by may 2009, the government has provided credit facilities to aig in the order of $180 billion, the largest bailout in history. the us government also takes over fannie and freddie mac in septem-• ber 2008, owners or guarantors of about half of the $12 trillion mortgage market. a cut in half of global stock market capitalisation from some $63 trillion • to only $31 trillion by november 2008. in december 2008, the largest ponzi scheme in history at $65 billion, and • run by bernard l. madoff investment securities (madoff being a former head of the nasdaq), collapses. in february 2009, the obama administration gains congressional sup-• port for an emergency economic stabilization package nominally figured at $787 billion, the largest such stimulus measure in history. by april 2009, estimates are ranging from $2.7 trillion to $5 trillion for • potential losses to banks for collateralized debt obligations (cdos) assets, with half this falling on us banks. it is also estimated that an astounding half of all cdos will default. the filing for chapter 11 bankruptcy protection by general motors on • june 1, 2009, the largest such filing by an industrial company at $82 billion in assets and $173 billion in debt. the estimated costs to us taxpayers for the financial crisis are notoriously • hard to come by from the government, but one official puts the figure at a possible $23.7 trillion dollars. by 2009, the numbers of officially unemployed in the us are over 15 mil-• lion, or over 10 percent of the labour force, with over 20 million estimated global job losses since the onset of the crisis. the us budget deficit for fiscal year 2009 is estimated at a stunning $1.42 • trillion dollars, and 12.3 percent of gdp, a deficit share last seen during ww ii. budgetary forecasts for 2010 are only slightly improved. permanent austerity: the politics of the canadian exit strategy from fiscal stimulus 10 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research for the first time since the great depression, world output as a whole • declined by 0.6 percent in 2009, with the us suffering a slump of -2.4 percent, the advanced economies of -3.2 percent and the developing economies (including india and china) growing by only 2.5 percent. with the us mortgage meltdown and liquidity crisis triggering a global economic crisis, canada could not be insulated from the economic turbulence. nor was canada cut-off from the processes of financialization and credit bubbles that formed in the us. the crisis in canada has not been as severe as in the us, but there are certain features that bear noting (department of finance 2010; bank of canada 2009; mcnish and mcarthur 2008; baragar 2009). from budgetary measures introduced in 2006, state mortgage guarantees • in canada more than doubled by the end of 2008. this included the move by mortgage lenders into high risk mortgages of 40 years and no down payment (after prompting from us mortgage brokers, and notably aig). the canada mortgage and housing corporation (cmhc) effectively carrying much of the foreclosure risk, with financial institutions reaping the rewards of high leverage. this has included the cmhc taking major swaps in mortgages for ‘cash’ for the banks to help bolster their balance sheets. in august 2007 as problems in derivatives markets began to spread, the • asset-backed commercial paper market (abcp) in canada froze-up with some $32 billion in paper not being able to be traded. after removing the 30 percent limit on foreign asset holdings in canadian • retirement plans in 2005, us bond placements in canada increase from a mere $1.5 billion in 2004 to almost $27 billion in 2007. from the fall of 2007 through 2009, the bank of canada begins to take a • series of measures to increase liquidity in the financial system. this included driving interest rates down to just 0.5 per cent, and injecting billions into the financial system through purchases of government of canada securities, but also extending to the purchase of private sector securities and commercial paper. while the lead canadian financial institutions avoided collapse in 2008, • canadian equity markets more than matched the us decline, government of canada treasury bill yields collapsed, and spreads with commercial pa11 per shot up. these indications of liquidity problems moved the finance ministry to implement an extraordinary financing framework (eff) with $200 billion in available funds. with the turbulence in world markets, canadian growth rates fell sharply • from average rates of about 3 per cent from 2004-2007, to just about 0.4 per cent for 2008, before tanking at -2.6 per cent for 2009. positive growth is returning across 2010 but expected to remain sluggish. as a consequence, the official unemployment moved from 6.0 for 2007 to 8.3 in 2009, and has stayed in this range since. as a consequence of falling output and fiscal support for canadian finan-• cial institutions, the budgetary position of the federal government moved from a surplus in 2007-08 of about $10 billion, to a deficit of $6 billion for 2008-09 and spiraling to $-54 billion for 2009-10. from financial rescue to public sector austerity the severity of the economic crisis left little alternative to massive state-led ‘rescue strategies’ across the world market, although concentrated in the core countries, including canada. the rescue had two overarching components: a series of measures to stabilize the financial system and enhance conditions for borrowing; and fiscal stimulus to offset the demand shock from the collapse of the financial system and the severe decline in world trade (loxley 2009; roubini and mihm 2010). the first and most urgent measures were to address the insolvency crisis of specific financial institutions where firms were facing massive loan losses or runs on deposits. in an unprecedented number of countries, the actions included forced mergers, bank nationalizations and, in almost all countries, specific steps to bailout banks by offloading ‘troubled assets’ into the state sector or central banks. as well, governments established emergency credit facilities available to financial institutions (as canada did with the eff and the cmhc) and boosting guarantees on deposits. second, governments (in the form of central banks like the bank of canada) undertook a number of policies to re-establish liquidity in financial markets. these included: extensive interventions and guarantees for inter-bank lending market; purchases of government and private securities and commercial paper; allowing banks to increase their borrowing leverage against high-quality assets; purchase of bank equity to boost cash on balance-sheets; and by directly purchasing government debt issuances and thus government cash deposits held in banks. third, financial regulatory institutions moved to oversee directly the operations of specific markets, deploy emergency oversight of others and arrange extensive audits of financial inpermanent austerity: the politics of the canadian exit strategy from fiscal stimulus 12 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research stitutions. finally, central banks have driven down their key market-setting interest rate, often by 2009 to the point of negative real rates, to encourage lending and widen spreads for banks. as bank lending has remained sluggish and markets highly unstable, this has included central banks radically pushing down the yield curves on 5 and 10 year government bonds. these measures occurred, to various degrees and at different stages, across the core capitalist states from 2007-10 to ‘rescue’ the financial system from collapsing credit markets. to address the shock to aggregate demand, a coordinated turn to emergency fiscal expansion was led by the us government and the g20 states, with governments adopting, in general, fiscal deficits in the order of 2-5 percent of gdp (although with the severe banking crises and recession, these levels were much larger in the us and britain) (stiglitz 2010; onaran 2010). as a consequence, and after two decades of neoliberal efforts to enforce balanced budgeting doctrines, to lower government debt to gdp ratios, and to reduce overall non-military and non-debt servicing expenditures (in other words, to reduce programmed social spending and activist industrial policies), government debt levels rose dramatically. (by some measures, and despite no major collapse in financial institutions, canada had one of the largest fiscal stimulus packages and one of the most supportive monetary policies. see td economics 3 august 2010.) at the first sign of the crisis stabilizing in late 2009, a campaign began being waged for ‘exit strategies’ from the emergency measures. this has been led by neoliberal think-tanks, the financial sector, the wider business community and international financial institutions. one exit is to leave behind the emergency oversight of financial markets and complete the installation of a new regulatory structure so that full-blown derivatives trading, particularly in credit instruments and a fullrange of interest and exchange rate swaps, can be re-established. this exit includes the dodd-frank wall street reform and consumer protection act passed in july 2010, which focuses on increased transparency in derivatives trading, limits on bank proprietary trading, regulatory consolidation, financial products consumer protection, a ‘resolution regime’ for financial crises, and a new proposals for international financial rating and regulatory standards. the new basel iii accord agreed to in september 2010 among global bank regulators also sets higher reserves to be held against potential losses, and more than doubles the key capital ratio to 4.5 per cent from the current 2 per cent (financial times 13 september 2010). the widely discussed financial transactions tax (a version of the tobin tax long campaigned for by progressives to slow financial speculation) has come to naught, although a few eu countries are imposing a tiny levy on certain features of financial trades. canada, in this case, has viewed its financial regulatory regime as a success over the 13 crisis and mainly undertook special policy measures rather than develop emergency regulatory machinery. the canadian exit here will simply be to tail some of the international agreements as they proceed to implementation. a second exit is to return to a ‘normal’ monetary policy focused again on an ‘inflation-targeting regime’, and away from overly stimulative interest rates being set by central banks to spur bank lending and profitability. the bank of canada, for example, has moved the bank rate up three times since june 2010 to 1.25 per cent in september, to signal a return to more normal credit conditions. however, this exit remains highly contingent and no further increases are suggested into 2011 given the fragility of the recovery and the depth of problems still pervading the financial markets. and a third exit – and the focus of the most heated political debate – is from deficit-spending fiscal policies toward public sector austerity. although there is some caution on the rush to austerity, notably from the us government, the oecd, world bank, and the imf are all calling for austerity, with the last notably suggesting two decades of ‘fiscal consolidation’ may be in order; or, more or less, ‘permanent austerity’ (imf may 2010: 30). the first two exits attempt to return to finance-led growth and financial disciplining that have been characteristic of neoliberalism. that this approach is dominating banking and monetary policies suggests how little the ruling classes have been destabilized within states (and particularly in the us and canada where it is easy enough to see the political right and business in ascendancy) or across states (where competitive rivalries over world market shares have intensified in conditions of stagnant growth, but no general challenges or alternative approaches can plausibly be pointed to apart from the us). the fiscal exit to austerity revolves around ‘who will pay for the crisis?’ and reasserts the distributional and administrative dynamics of the neoliberal form of the state. this exit marginalizes attempts to move fiscal policy toward a ‘green new deal’ or rebuilding the welfare state and public infrastructure that fleetingly appeared on the political horizon in the midst of the crisis; and it insulates the financial sector and the capitalist classes for assuming the costs of the ‘rescue strategies’. instead, the fiscal exits are focused on: bolstering bank and corporate profits through further tax cuts and shifting away from taxes on property, income and capital; cutting public sector wages, pensions and employment levels; cutting welfare transfers; imposing user fees; and beginning another round of privatization and ‘monetization’ of public sector assets. the general notion, expressed at the toronto g20 summit and other international meetings, is cutting public sector deficits in half by 2013, and phasing in a reduction of debt to gdp rations after 2016. permanent austerity: the politics of the canadian exit strategy from fiscal stimulus 14 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research across the central capitalist states, the context of the exits to austerity and the political struggles they have invoked have been quite diverse (panitch, albo and chibber 2010). in the irish case, for example, a major banking collapse has led to a severe economic crisis. as part of the eurozone, this has left ireland without the possibility of resort to devaluation to aid adjustment and public sector restrain has been a central focus of restructuring. three austerity budgets have been introduced in less than 2 years. the first two largely coped with the collapse of the housing market and the main banks, while the last budget of december 2009 shifted the cost of the crisis onto the public sector. expenditure cuts of more than $4 billion euros were made with $1 billion of that coming from pay. public sector workers are to take an average 7 per cent pay cut, while there is a 4.1 percent reduction in social benefits including for unemployment. but after a number of public sector walkouts and threats of a general strike, the irish congress of trade unions and key public sector unions have attempted to maintain the ‘irish partnership’ and negotiate austerity. this led to an agreement that may result in the loss of 18-20,000 public sector jobs, largely ends overtime pay, creates a two-tier workforce marked by lower wages and pensions for all new hires into the public sector, and prohibits any industrial action for three years. greece faces some of the same constraints as ireland as part of the eurozone, but did not go through the same banking collapse. rather, the crisis in public finances has been a result of the general weakness of greek capitalism and the greek state. its exit strategy, therefore, has been a more proto-typical neoliberal stabilization programme. for example, pay for public sector workers is to be cut by 7 percent and frozen for the next five years; the value-added tax increased from 21 to 23 percent; contract/temporary workers in the public sector are to be terminated; the retirement age is to be raised; pensions will be based on lifetime earnings which will result in a 45 to 60 percent cut; and everything from water companies, railways and airlines are being discussed for privatization. this has, in turn, generated mass class conflict with five general strikes already launched by august 2010. with the social democratic pasok party in power, greece has been a case of ‘social liberal’ austerity. in contrast to these two cases, the us has had a massive financial crisis after years of credit-aided economic expansion as the world’s dominant economic power and issuer of the key reserve currency. as the world market’s ‘consumer of last resort’, the us government has played a key role in coordinating the rescue strategies of the financial system and of the stimulus measures. indeed, its global responsibilities for managing the world capitalist system has made the obama administration the most reluctant of the core states to turn to austerity. instead, austerity has been displaced to the state level. thirty-three states, for instance, are facing budget 15 shortfalls of 20 percent or more in 2010-11. since the summer of 2008, 231,000 state and local government jobs have been lost. all states combined are running a deficit of 30.2 percent of total budgetary requirements. to deal with this public services are being cut: states have reduced health benefits for low-income earners; 25 states are in the process of cutting support to primary and secondary education; 34 states are cutting support to state colleges and universities; 26 states have implemented hiring freezes; 13 states have laid off workers; and 22 states have cut public sector wages and salaries. in california alone the governor has proposed cuts that will result in the loss of 331,000 jobs. but across the us only sporadic protests have erupted, with public sector coalition fightbacks forming, but soon faltering. indeed, political space in the us is increasingly being taken up by the political right, most visibly seen in the emergence of the ‘tea party’ movement within the republican party. the us is a case where a defeated and traumatized working class is facing another period of punitive austerity in an effort to revitalize the american capitalist class and the delusions of the american dream. canada: from fiscal orthodoxy to ‘rescue’ and back canada has neither had the severe financial crisis of ireland, the uk and the us, nor the long-term competitiveness and financial problems of greece or other countries in the european periphery. canada’s monopolistic financial sector has been protected by its market structure, the underwriting of high-risk mortgages by the state, and the support given by the bank of canada to the financial sector to maintain profit margins. there has been, moreover, a long-term pattern of fiscal austerity by the federal and provincial governments that dates back to the 1980s (doern 2009; mcbride 2005). systematic reviews of programme expenditures were established in the last years of the liberal pierre trudeau government, and given particular prominence in the nielson task force on programme review of the conservative brian mulroney government. these governments began the neoliberal restructuring of the canadian state, in terms of programme administration and levels of support, shifting tax policies, and restraining expenditures and the deficit. it was, however, the liberal government of jean chretien and finance minister paul martin that the deficit was reduced through a radical programme of cuts and a displacement of fiscal responsibilities through the inter-government system. the canadian fiscal ‘miracle’ was founded upon the destruction of 50-50 cost sharing programs created in the 1960s to support health care, social services, income maintenance and post-secondary education. this programme spending was off-loaded onto the provinces. they, in turn, restrained expenditures and, following the same logic of displacement, dumped as much as they could onto municipalities and cities. local governments in canada are now entering a second decade of a fiscal crisis, permanent austerity: the politics of the canadian exit strategy from fiscal stimulus 16 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research of cutbacks and astonishing levels of unmet infrastructure spending. a canadian strategy of punitive austerity for public sector workers and services, coupled with the inter-governmental displacement of obligations, established a pattern of federal and provincial government surpluses. in coming to power in 2006, the hard right government of stephen harper had only to build on this financial legacy. it shaped, as will be shown, both the ‘rescue’ and ‘exit’ strategies to the financial crisis of the canadian state. the 2008 fiscal update: fiscal orthodoxy rarely does fiscal policy become the source of high drama, but that is exactly what unfolded at the national level of the canadian state over an 8 week period spanning 27 november 2008 to 27 january 2009. within that short timeframe, the harper government’s fiscal policy lurched from an uncompromising commitment to balanced budget orthodoxy to keynesian style emergency stimulus. the two forces behind the fiscal re-tacking were the severity of the economic crisis and washington’s call for a coordinated global stimulus package led by the g20, and the possibility that a vote of non-confidence would see the minority conservative government replaced in government by a coalition of liberals and new democratic party (ndp) backed by the bloc quebecois (bq). on 27 november 2008, finance minister jim flaherty delivered the annual economic and fiscal statement, essentially an update of the previous budget. in his address to parliament flaherty acknowledged that this was a dire time of “unprecedented deterioration in economic and financial systems around the world” and that such “difficult times” would require “difficult choices” (department of finance 2008). while governments around the globe embarked upon unprecedented public spending programs to contain the damage to their imploding economies and financial systems, canada’s conservative government announced that their antirecession plan was to keep the budget balanced. they did cede, however, that they would re-assess the situation in the weeks ahead (department of finance 2008). alongside flaherty’s out-of-step budget orthodoxy, the minister proceeded to lay down a series of political attacks that would, on the one hand, challenge the fundraising capacity of the opposition parties to exist and, on the other, intensify the assault on federal public service unions. prefacing his first bombshell by saying that tax dollars should not be “spent frivolously”, he announced that the $1.95 per vote subsidy parties received would be terminated. this would deprive the political parties of a major source of income. based on the votes received for each party in the 2008 election this would result in a loss for the liberals of $7.7 million, for the ndp $4.9 million, and $2.6 million for the bq (cbc 26 november 2008). second, he announced that legislation would be presented suspending the right to strike for federal public servants for 2010-11, 17 and that the wages of public service workers would be constrained for four years at 2.3 per cent in the first year and 1.5 per cent for the subsequent three years. third, in an effort to undermine the success of pay equity complaints filed against the federal government and adjudicated by the canadian human rights commission, flaherty announced that legislation would be introduced to terminate adjudication by the canadian human rights commission. instead, they would require that pay equity be dealt with only through the collective bargaining process – a process that could itself be uprooted at any time as he had just demonstrated (department of finance 2008). in the midst of an exploding financial crisis, the conservative government appeared adamant that they would rather cut spending than engage in the type of massive stimulus spending programs that the us and others were embarking upon. instead, their focus was on taking advantage of a liberal party in disarray and attempting to bankrupt the opposition parties. the opposition response was rapid. ndp leader jack layton, responding to earlier rumours of what the update contained, had already asked former leader ed broadbent to call former liberal prime minister jean chretien to discuss how the two parties might coordinate a response (valpy 2009, 11). the liberals had also announced that they would be moving a non-confidence motion on 1 december, three days hence. harper’s operatives and mps were picking up news that the three opposition parties were rapidly moving toward some form of common front. harper moved to delay the confidence vote to 8 december and thus began a series of government retreats from what they had just announced. on 29 november, the government announced it was dropping its plan to eliminate the subsidy to political parties. the next day, 30 november, the government retreated from the strike ban and announced that it would table a budget on 27 january 2009 to respond to the economic crisis. the opposition parties pressed ahead saying that harper had revealed what his real agenda was and that he had to be stopped. on monday december 1st, the liberals, ndp and bq unveiled their accord that would see the liberals and ndp share cabinet seats with the support of the bq which would remain outside cabinet (valpy 2009: 11-13). the accord ensured that the coalition would command a majority in parliament until 30 june, 2011 (dion and layton 2008). harper immediately said he would seek a prorogation of parliament: on december 3rd in an address on national television harper poured vitriol on the coalition arguing that it was a fundamentally undemocratic maneuver that did not respect the choice canadians had made in the previous election. his government would “use every legal means at our disposal to protect our democracy, to protect our economy, and to protect canada” (national post 2008). the following day harper met with the permanent austerity: the politics of the canadian exit strategy from fiscal stimulus 18 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research governor-general, who granted his request for prorogation. the coalition was dead. the question now turned to whether the fiscal update was as well. budget 2009: emergency keynesianism a new speech from the throne was delivered on january 26 and signaled that the harper government was now going to set a more conciliatory tone and, quite remarkably given the remarks just a few months prior, a budgetary u-turn. the speech noted that “the government’s agenda and the priorities of parliament must adapt in response to the deepening crisis. old assumptions must be tested and old decisions must be rethought” (clark and galloway 26 january 2009). the finance minister’s conversion from the most dogmatic of balanced budget conservatives to a deficit spending ‘keynesian’ came the next day in the 2009 budget speech. at the core of “canada’s economic action plan” was an emergency fiscal stimulus built on a budgetary deficit of $34 billion and then $30 billion over two years. emergency stimulus measures were then to be terminated, with deficit spending steadily reduced. this included $12 billion for infrastructure projects (department of finance 27 january 2009: 4). in addition, other key budget measures included a $20 billion cut to personal income taxes, $50 billion to expand a government program to purchase mortgages from banks, and $13 billion in additional financing for several state-owned agencies concerned with insuring mortgages, export marketing and business loans (globe and mail 27 january 2009). with the possibility of a liberal-ndp coalition government all but gone, and with michael ignatieff, a reluctant supporter of the coalition accord, replacing stephan dion as leader, the liberals decided to support the budget if the conservatives agreed to an amendment that required the government to a regimen of three updates on the implementation of the budget. although the pettiest of symbols, ignatieff characterized it as “putting this government on probation” (cbc 28 january 2009). as for the prospects of the coalition, bq leader gilles duceppe summed up: “it’s dead. it’s over. it’s finished” (cbc 28 january 2009). budget 2010: back to austerity on march 4, 2010, jim flaherty tabled his fifth budget as harper’s finance minister. the fiscal plan presented in budget 2010 contrasts with the previous year’s reluctant ‘rescue’ budget. ‘canada’s economic action plan’ was born out of, on the one side, the efforts to coordinate emergency stimulus spending by the g20, and, on the other, the coalition accord challenging the political stability of the harper minority government. in contrast, budget 2010 assumed the corner has turned on the economic crisis and presents a plan for ‘exit’ from deficit financing and a return to balanced budget orthodoxy. moreover, a ‘crisis in public finance’ is now assessed as the foremost problem to be addressed. the conservatives are seizing an 19 opportunity to deepen the neoliberalization of the canadian state well beyond an exit strategy from the emergency fiscal keynesianism. budget 2010 proposes an aggressive plan to bring federal public finances back to balance, although the actual state of the canadian economy and public finances measures comparatively well against other large economies. for example, through the ‘great recession’ the canadian economy contracted less than the average of the core economies at 2.5 per cent in 2009, and is expected to grow at a faster clip for both 2010 and 2011 (imf 2010). in 2009-10, the combined federal and provincial deficits equaled -5.5 per cent of gdp. the federal deficit alone equals -3.1 per cent of total gdp. in historical perspective, this is modest given that during the mulroney era in the 1980s, the federal deficit stood between 5.6 and 5.8 per cent of gdp (td economics august 3 2010). in comparative perspective, the canadian position is rather modest given that deficit to gdp calculations for the us is -11.0 per cent, in the uk -11.3 per cent, and for the oecd as a whole -7.9 per cent. similarly, with respect to debt levels, canada falls toward the lower end of the spectrum with debt accounting for 28.6 per cent of gdp. this looks rather manageable compared with 56.4 per cent for the us, 46.9 per cent for the uk, and 50.2 per cent for germany (td economics august 3 2010, 4). while the recovery is widely regarded as fragile and uncertain, the harper government has with budget 2010 declared the great recession a historical relic. the priority now is an uncompromising five-year march to a near balanced budget in the fiscal year 2015-16. a range of constraint measures are to be deployed but without question a big part of achieving that target is the winding down of stimulus spending as of march 31, 2011. in addition to the termination of this spending, the budget plans to cap international assistance spending at 2010 levels, reduce defense spending by $500 million in 2012 through to 2014 as the afghanistan mission shrinks, and a three year freeze on federal program spending that will see 11 thousand public service jobs disappear (conference board of canada 2010, 11). these measures are expected to contain growth in program spending to 2.2 per cent per year. to place this in comparative perspective what this means is that within a five year frame, the federal deficit as a percentage of gdp will shrink from -3.1 per cent in 2010-11 to -0.1 per cent (td economics 4 march 2010, 2). one bank forecast even projects a surplus of $1 billion in 2014-15, although there is also the caution that the scale of the cuts may slow economic growth in canada by 0.2 to 0.4 per cent (td economics 3 august 2010, 6). another forecast suggests that the government revenue forecasts are set low based on exceedingly low growth expectations. the result is that revenues to the government will be better than expected and by 2013 these may be as much as $6.3 billion higher than forecast. if this proves accupermanent austerity: the politics of the canadian exit strategy from fiscal stimulus 20 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research rate, a fiscal balance will be achieved a full year ahead of target (browarski, stewart, and derby 2010, 1; hodgson and stewart 29 july 2010). but even while a program for aggressively shrinking public expenditures was being presented, the finance minister boasted that canada’s federal tax-to-gdp ratio had dropped to its lowest level since 1961 (budget 2010, 10). this is astonishing given that 1961 precedes the advent of the important redistributive cost-sharing programs of the late 1960s that enabled an expansion in public health care, postsecondary education, social assistance and a myriad of other services and programs. there is clearly the fiscal space in canada to increase spending and taxation by at least two per cent of gdp to bring canada’s spending up to the level it was during a period marked by the most progressive innovations in redistributive policy in this country’s history (yalnizyan, 22 march 2010). in short, the response presented in budget 2010 to canada’s federal public deficit and debt is an exaggeration. however, other policies sprinkled throughout the budget suggest that this exit is about more than public finances. budget 2010 includes a massive deregulation program, corporate tax cuts, and a further liberalization of foreign investment. with respect to cuts to corporate income tax, the finance minister noted that by 2012 “canada will have the lowest statutory corporate income tax rate in the g7” (budget 2010, 10). the goal is to reduce the federal general corporate tax rate to 15 per cent and to move toward a combined federal and provincial corporate tax rate of 25 per cent by 2012. to place this in perspective, in 2000 the federal corporate tax rate was 28 per cent and the combined federal and provincial corporate tax rates were 43.6 per cent. within a 12 year span, taxes on corporations operating in canada will have been nearly halved by a succession of liberal and conservative governments (budget 2010, 47; department of finance 2003). the deregulatory dimension of the budget received scant attention despite the fact that these proposals seriously erode environment protection and open the door wide for mining and hydro carbon exploration in the fragile eco-systems of the arctic. the budget proposes a ‘red tape reduction commission’ involving both conservative members of parliament and ‘private sector representatives’, to review and eliminate federal regulations that are seen to impede investment and development. this mimics the red tape commission set up by the harris government in ontario in 1995 but goes even further. business interests who had been subject to regulation can now advocate from within the canadian state to terminate or change regulations to which their industries are subjected. in the absurdly named objective of ‘green jobs and growth’, environmental regulations that have served to at least assess and shape investment and development projects are undermined. indian and northern affairs have been directed to ‘accelerate’ the process of reviewing resource extraction projects in the arctic so as to ‘remove barriers to private investment’. the 21 regulatory system is to be ‘modernized’ by transferring responsibility for conducting environmental assessments of large energy projects from the canadian environmental assessment agency to the much more producer and investment friendly national energy board. and budget 2010 furthers foreign investment liberalization by removing restrictions on foreign ownership in canada’s satellite sector (budget 2010, 93-102). while the heavy hand of state regulation over the environment and economy is lightened, the canadian security and intelligence service will see its budget grow by $28 million (budget 2010, 127). the harper government’s 2010 budget is leading an aggressive attack on the fiscal deficit engendered by the economic crisis and the bailouts of the financial system. in many ways canada is at the forefront of the central capitalist states in undermining public services as it has been since the chretien-martin budgets of the mid-1990s. the punitive austerity they imposed has been sustained across the last decade and the harper government. the ‘fiscal crisis’ that has been sparked by the panic rush to exit strategies from the emergency fiscal stimulus is being used as a further opportunity to intensify the neoliberal restructuring of the regulatory and redistributive remnants of the welfare state. it would not be too far off to describe the evolution of canadian fiscal strategy as a turn to permanent austerity, particularly when the constraints on provincial budgetary policies are also considered. the provincial exits to austerity while the federal government is attempting to move methodically toward balance within five years, the budgetary position of the canadian provinces is much more uneven. in fiscal year 2009, the ten provinces collectively ran the largest provincial deficit in history at $48.2 billion. this equals 3.2 per cent of provincial gdp. it is expected that a combination of improving economic conditions and the conclusion of provincial stimulus programs will help the provinces reduce this deficit to $34 billion in 2011 (conference board of canada 2010). but beyond that, how some of the provinces, especially ontario and quebec, exit fiscal deficit without a radical reconsideration of how revenues are raised or public services are delivered is difficult to imagine. the provinces diverge widely in their exit planning both in time frame and policy measures. whether social democratic or conservative, they all share a fidelity to ensuring the cost of the crisis is borne by workers via tax shifting, declining levels and quality of public services and regressive user fees. for example, various new and higher consumption taxes have been introduced in nova scotia, quebec, manitoba and saskatchewan. quebec has further added new user fees and introduced a health ‘premium’. all provinces have presented budgets that aim to keep program expenditure growth at or below 2 per cent per year; have cut or frozen operational budgets permanent austerity: the politics of the canadian exit strategy from fiscal stimulus 22 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research and introduced constraints on public sector compensation and the number of staff working in the core public services. only nova scotia has introduced a tax on high income earners and only manitoba has indefinitely postponed a planned 1 point cut in the corporate income tax rate (td economics 3 august 2010, 7). of all the provinces, ontario’s budget position is the most politically and fiscally complicated. ontario’s ‘third-way’ liberals have reinvested in public services since arriving in government in 2003 after defeating a conservative party led largely by mike harris. however, they have also been committed to some of the key principles of the common sense revolution—regressive taxation, a fidelity to balanced budgets, and an ongoing erosion of social assistance benefits. the finance minister, dwight duncan, signaled a new era of austerity in his 2010 budget. first, the public sector compensation restraint to protect public services act was tabled and which froze the salaries and wages of 350,000 non-union public sector workers until march 31 2012. the second signal delivered was that the liberal government would ask the unions representing 700,000 broader public sector workers to accept a minimum 2 year wage freeze. such an agreement would yield an estimated $750 million per year in savings (ontario ministry of finance 2010). third, ontario will continue with its ongoing plan to cut corporate taxes. this will cost the province $1.2 billion in each of the next three years resulting in an accumulative loss of $3.6 billion (nupge 31 march 2010). fourth, the budget contemplates a massive privatization of public assets including the liquor control board that regulates the sale of alcohol, the ontario lottery and gaming commission, public electricity producers and distributors among others as a means to generate a large amount of revenue. (however, the political focus appears to be on public sector wage cuts, with the privatization measures being delayed or shunted to the side.) as a whole, ontario’s 2010 budget forecasts 7 years of austerity with a plan that extends to 2017-18 when a zero-deficit is achieved. this will result in a shrinking of ontario’s public economy from a current 19.2 per cent of gdp to 15.5 per cent in 2017-18 (td economics 25 march 2010, 1). this translates as a nearly 20 per cent contraction of ontario’s public sector, leaving it at a size that corresponds to that of the period of the common sense revolution. if the ontario budget was the most complex of the provincial budgets in the hardest hit economy from the financial crisis, the most draconian budget of all the 2010 provincial budgets was delivered by the liberal government of quebec on 30 march 2010. the more regressive measures include a health care user-fee that applies to all citizens 18 years of age and older. this user fee will reach $200/year in 2012; a $25 fee per visit with a medical doctor; a 17 per cent increase in electricity costs by 2018; a 2 per cent increase in the sales tax; the core public service is subject 23 to a pay freeze until 2014; an ongoing shrinking of the number of public sector workers by allowing only one replacement hire for every two retirements/departures; a review of all government programs; and the closure or amalgamation of 30 public agencies (quebec ministry of finance march 30 2010, press release #1). it needs noting that the measures directed at public sector workers is in addition to the charest government’s draconian law c-43 passed in 2005. the legislation imposed a two-year wage freeze and restricted wage increases thereafter to 2 per cent. moreover, the bill introduced anti-strike provision ensuring there would be no union resistance and backed this up with punitive provisions including a $500 fine for any worker defying the legislation in addition to a penalty for striking of two days pay for every day on strike. the combined effect of five years of frozen wages followed by increases falling below the rate of inflation resulted in a decline in real incomes for public sector workers of 4 per cent (mandel 2010). resisting austerity, defending public services the turn to austerity in the core capitalist states has generated general strikes, disruption of public service delivery and sustained protests. these will continue over the coming year as the cuts are only starting and the impacts of austerity more severe and inequitable through time. in all cases, the cuts are revitalizing anti-neoliberal movements, and leading to new attempts to forge coalitions between public sector workers and users. the form of these alliances, however, varies greatly: from the general strikes and fusion with an emerging socialist politics in the european periphery; to the contradiction between the community based anti-cuts alliances and the peak-union ‘partnership’ with the government in ireland; to the surging then sputtering fightback campaigns at the state and local levels in the us under the shadow of an ascending hard right. after a number of previous coalitions against neoliberalism—in the struggles against nafta, the ontario days of action, the public sector common fronts in b.c. and quebec, the militant walkouts by nurses in alberta and other provinces— the union movement in canada has retreated into a defensive posture and the social movements are in a sustained phase of disorganization and political uncertainty. the exit strategy of ‘permanent austerity’ emerging out of the canadian state and capitalist classes provides a direct challenge to the left in canada at a moment of historical weakness. the federal ‘exit’ budget, for example, was met with criticism from the canadian labour congress, the council of canadians, among others. they argued that it laid out a program for eroding public services, economic sovereignty, and environmental protections, as well as its targeting public sector wages and work. but there is little evidence of strategy for resisting the cuts, or of a broader permanent austerity: the politics of the canadian exit strategy from fiscal stimulus 24 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research campaign of resistance through grass-roots mobilization of union members, social movements and users of public services. there is little beyond the ad hoc negotiating fronts of public sector unions and the sectoral campaigns around specific policy issues—climate change, healthcare, erosion of public broadcasting, and so forth. this is in part explained by canada’s decentralized federalism with the provinces delivering public goods, such as health, education and social services, which are a key terrain for struggles over cuts. in quebec, for instance, there has been a measure of political mobilization in defence of public services and workers’ rights. after five years of legislated wage restraint, quebec’s public sector workers formed a common front—composed of the confederation of national trade unions, the quebec federation of labour, and the inter-union secretariat of public services, and representing 475,000 workers—in anticipation of law 43’s expiration in march 2010 and an austerity budget being delivered to the national assembly. the front’s main demand was for an 11.25 per cent wage increase over a three year period. but the common front refused to join forces with the broad-based coalition against user fees and privatization that emerged in response to the 2010 budget. instead, the unions signed a five year ‘accord’ with the government that falls far short of restoring public sector wages and working conditions. the five year agreement will provide a 7 per cent increase or 10.5 per cent if there is better than expected economic growth. given inflation, quebec’s public sector workers are facing a further five years of declining income (mandel 2010). the quebec case bears parallels to the irish unions negotiating to preserve the illusions of ‘partnership’ with the state at the expense of austerity. in ontario, the momentum for a similar union accommodation, in this case without any union mobilization at all, may well prove unavoidable. since 2003, the ontario liberals have built something of the old ‘lib-lab’ alliance with several key unions that has filled the electoral vacuum left by much of labour abandoning the ndp after imposing a ‘social contract’ under the rae government in the 1990s. the ontario government has been holding preliminary talks on restraint with a wide number of unions with public employees. to date, most unions have walked away from the talks, and voiced opposition to the wage restraint. but it is not so clear that the unions will mobilize opposition to the wage restraint or the cuts to government services, and build toward the strikes that will be necessary to break the budgetary proposals to have workers and the poor pay for the crisis. it would be foolish to rule out a deal emerging between a number of unions and the mcguinty government and further consolidation of a ‘lib-lab’ alliance under the fear that a conservative government would be even worse. it is completely delusional that such ‘there is no alternative’ politics challenges austerity or builds an anti-neoliberal political bloc. 25 there is, however, a number of campaigns in ontario—notably, against welfare cuts to the special diet and for disabilities support, indigenous peoples struggles around mining, demands for improved public transit, ecology fights about commodification of water and the boreal forest—that are illustrative of the anti-austerity politics forming in specific sectors. these need to deepen their struggles over specific state apparatuses and bases of support in local communities and develop the organizational linkages of a province-wide anti-neoliberal front. the ontario health coalition (ohc) includes nurses, unions, progressive doctors, and a vast array of community organizations, and is part of the canada health coalition network; it is a good example of the potential to build an alternate political campaign to defend public services. in response to ontario’s 2010 budget, for example, the ohc rejected the 1.5 per cent increase in hospital funding that budget provided. the ohc concluded that this created a “gap between hospital funding and inflation for the third year in a row” (ohc 25 march 2010). the ohc has also effectively opposed the ontario government’s policy of incremental privatization of health care institutions and delivery. examples include the ohcs opposition to the marketization of home care where a steady increase in for-profit contracting has been observed and the government’s policy of public-private partnerships (p3s) in the hospital sector. p3 hospital projects have been characterized by public healthcare advocates as ‘pay more, get less’ projects that fatten private profits at public expense. an analysis of four ontario p3 hospital projects in sarnia, ottawa, brampton and north bay found that they were posting budget overruns of 75 per cent. they were costing not the planned $1.2 billion but rather $2.1 billion, and delivered less bed capacity than had been planned as well (canadian health coalition march 2009). these campaigns have built up impressive community alliances between public sector healthcare workers, local health policy activists and the wider union and progressive movements in defence of public healthcare. the campaigns to defend public hospitals and healthcare offer an example of popular resistance, and the potential to expand this mobilization to other parts of the public sector such as waste management, transit, and energy production. opposition to workers bearing the cost of the crisis and defence of public expenditure is the beginning case to be made. this will require linking public sector ‘producers’ with ‘users’ of public services. the quality of these services is directly connected to public sector workers. and there is any number of areas where the quality of public goods and spaces—parks, welfare provision, public transit—needs democratization and expansion. however, it is increasingly clear that the ‘exits’ from the emergency keynesian measures introduced at the height of the crisis are intensifying the market and class disciplines of neoliberalism. this does not mean less state, or even permanent austerity: the politics of the canadian exit strategy from fiscal stimulus 26 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research less regulation, but a particular form of state and regulatory policies that enhance capitalist class power. the political opposition to the austerity exits need to account for the class nature of neoliberalism in building new organizational capacities for resistance. the lines of social division and political conflicts forming at this phase of the crisis suggest that these will be struggles, in the first instance, against and within the neoliberal state and the politics in canada of permanent austerity. references bank of canada, july 2009, monetary policy report, available at www.bankofcanada.ca/en/mpr/. baragar, fletcher, 2009, “canada and the crisis,” in julie guard and wayne antony, eds., bankruptcies and bailouts, halifax: fernwood. bloomberg, july 20, 2009, “u.s. rescue may reach $23.7 trillion, barofsky says”, at http://www. bloomberg.com/. browarski, sabrina, matthew stewart and paul derby, 2010, budget report 2010: the long road to fiscal balance, conference board of canada, available at http://www.conferenceboard.ca/topics/economics/budgets/fed_2010_budget.aspx. canadian health coalition, 2009, “p3s = private profits, public pays”, available at http://medicare. ca/main/the-facts/p3s-private-profits-public-pays. cbc, 28 january 2009, “ignatieff puts tories ‘on probation’ with budget demand”, available at http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2009/01/28/ignatieff-decision.html. conference board of canada, summer 2010, canadian outlook, available at http://www.conferenceboard.ca/temp/9e6cbdc6-81e8-4a33-b0c1-c33bf33dc455/11-022_co-summer10-otlk_ web.pdf clark, campbell and gloria galloway, 26 january 2009, “harper’s words carry softer tone”, globe and mail. crotty, james, 2009, “structural causes of the global financial crisis,” cambridge journal of economics, 33. department of finance, 27 november 2008, the economic and fiscal statement 2008, available at http://www.fin.gc.ca/ec2008/speech-eng.html. department of finance, 4 march 2010, budget 2010: leading the way on jobs and growth available at http://www.budget.gc.ca/2010/pdf/speech-eng.pdf . department of finance, august 2003, federal corporate tax rate reductions, available at http:// www.fin.gc.ca/toc/2003/taxratered_-eng.asp. 27 dion, stephane and jack layton, 1 december 2008, an accord on a cooperative government to address the present economic crisis, available at http://www.liberal.ca/pdf/docs/081201_accord_en_signed.pdf. doern, bruce, 2009, “evolving budgetary policies and experiments,” in alan maslove, ed., how ottawa spends, 2009-2010: economic upheaval and political dysfunction, montreal: mcgillqueen’s university press. financial times, 13 september 2010, “basel deal reached on banks’ reserves.” government of canada, 3 march 2010, speech from the throne, a stronger canada. a stronger economy. now and for the future, available at http://www.speech.gc.ca/grfx/docs/sft-ddt-2010_e. pdf. globe and mail, 27 january 2009, “tax relief and major spending projects: a plan for troubled times”, available at http://v1.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/rtgam.20090127.wbudget_highlights0127/bnstory/budget2009/home. hodgson, glen and matthew stewart, 2010, canadian feds ahead of plan on fiscal rebalancing, conference board of canada, available at http://www.conferenceboard.ca/economics/hot_ eco_topics/default/10-07-29/canadian_feds_ahead_of_plan_on_fiscal_rebalancing.aspx. ilo, 2009, world of work report 2009: the global jobs crisis and beyond, geneva: ilo. imf, may 2010, fiscal monitor: navigating the fiscal challenges ahead, washington: imf. imf, july 2010, world economic outlook, washington: imf. loxley, john, 2009, “financial dimensions: origins and state responses,” in julie guard and wayne antony, eds., bankruptcies and bailouts, halifax: fernwood. mackenzie, hugh and richard shillington, 2009, canada’s quiet bargain: the benefits of public spending, toronto: canadian centre for policy alternatives. mandel, david. july 25 2010, fighting austerity? the public sector and the common front in quebec, the bullet, n. 396, available at http://www.socialistproject.ca/bullet/396.php. mcbride, stephen, 2005, paradigm shift: globalization and the canadian state, halifax: fernwood. mckinsey global institute, october 2008, mapping global capital markets: fifth annual report, new york: mckinsey global institute. mcnish, jacquie and greg mcarthur, december 13 2008, “how high risk mortgages crept north,’ globe and mail. national post, 3 december 2008, “stephen harper’s dec. 3, 2008 statement”, available at http://www. nationalpost.com/news/politics/story.html?id=1028147. permanent austerity: the politics of the canadian exit strategy from fiscal stimulus 28 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research national union of public and general employees, 31 march 2010, “public sector workers paying for corporate tax cuts”, available at http://www.nupge.ca/content/public-sector-workers-paying-corporate-tax-cuts. office of management and budget, 2010, “the budget” at www.budget.gov. onaran, özlem, 2010, ‘fiscal crisis in europe or a crisis of distribution?’ soas, research on money and finance, discussion paper, no. 18. ontario health coalition, 25 march 2010, “ontario health coalition response to provincial budget”, available at http://www.marketwire.com/press-release/ontario-health-coalition-responseprovincial-budget-mcguinty-must-stop-over-top-crisis-1138192.htm. ontario health coalition, 20 january 2006, “say no to privatized hospitals!”, available at http:// www.web.net/ohc/p3s/p3updatejan06.pdf. ontario ministry of finance, 25 march 2010, open ontario: ontario’s plan for jobs and growth, available at http://www.fin.gov.on.ca/en/budget/ontariobudgets/2010/statement.pdf. panitch, leo, greg albo and vivek chibber, eds., 2010, the socialist register 2011: the crisis this time, london: merlin press. quebec ministry of finance, 30 march 2010, choices for the future press release # 1, available at http://www.budget.finances.gouv.qc.ca/budget/2010-2011/en/documents/ communique_1en.pdf. realtytrac, 2010, “us foreclosures market report,” at www.realtytrac.com. roubini, nouriel and stephen mihm, 2010, crisis economics, new york: penguin. stiglitz, george, 2010, freefall, new york: w.w. norton. td economics, 4 march 2010, the 2010 federal budget, available at www.td.com/economics/budgets/fed10.pdf. td economics, 25 march 2010, a long road back to balance, available at http://www.td.com/economics/budgets/on10.pdf. td economics, 30 april 2010, fiscal green shoots, available at http://www.td.com/economics/special/db0410_fiscal.pdf. td economics, 3 august 2010, special report: canada’s fiscal exit strategy, available at http://www. td.com/economics/special/pg0810_fiscal_exit.pdf. valpy, michael, 2009, the ‘crisis’: a narrative, in peter russell and lorne sossin eds., parliamentary democracy in crisis, toronto: university of toronto press. yalnizyan, armine, 22 march 2010, now is the wrong time for fiscal frugality, canadian centre for policy alternatives, available at http://www.policyalternatives.ca/publications/commentary/now-wrong-time-fiscal-frugality. the struggle for equal pay for work of equal value: a case study stella lord introduction the concept of equal pay for women has not been tied to the concept of 'value' in most provincial equal pay legislation in canada. the pay of men in similar jobs in the same establishment has, in most cases, been the criterion for equal pay legislation. consequently, if women work in sex segregated jobs, or job 'ghettos', they remain outside the present legislation in most canadian provinces. possibly as a natural effect of the women's liberation movement on the one hand and frustration with the slow progress towards effective equal pay legislation on the other, women are now tending to turn to 2 unionization and union militancy to achieve higher rates of pay. except in one or two isolated instances, however, there have been few explicit demands based on the concept of equal pay for work of equal value. moreover, there is little uniformity in the extent to which the process of unionization itself is successful, or the economic benefits to be gained from it jre realized. unionization amongst nurses has been relatively successful on both counts, whereas unionization amongst bank tellers has been slow, spasmodic and localized , and unions have been unable to make real economic gains. the strike of the communication workers (bell canada) succeeded in making economic gains, whereas workers at radio shack, fleck and blue cross in ontario underwent long strikes merely to gain union recognition and the right to bargain. even where women are unionized, therefore, higher rates of pay (to say nothing of general overall parity with male workers) are not achieved without a struggle. unions, even the most militant and well organized, must face not only the economic power of their employers, but an ideologically structured industrial relations system which is also weighted against radical change in bargaining patterns. union militancy around the issue ot higher wages for women is certainly a step in the right direction. but while it provides a vehicle and a tool for the attainment of equal pay, unless demands are tied to the concept of value there are limitations on what it can do for women working in highly sex segregated jobs and for those with little or no collective bargaining strength. union militancy, therefore, is not a panacea. if the concept of equal pay for work of equal value were to become an accepted criterion on which pay rates were to be negotiated, however, it could have wide ranging effects on the status of women in our society, both inside and outside the labour movement. there is also the possibility that it could raise broader, more fundamental, questions about the 'value' of labour. for the concept of 'value' as a measurement for wage rates introduces a criterion which raises a number of questions about the labour market, the collective bargaining system and the 22 structure of wage rates. more important ly , for women in sex segregated work, it raises the question: what is the nature and function of the work that women have traditionally performed in our society? what is the 'real value' of women's work? in early october, 1977, local 31 of the steel plate examiners at the british american bank note company in ottawa went on strike for equal pay. their demand was for equal pay with some of the men in their plant whom they contended were doing jobs of considerably less skill and responsibility than their own. there was more than one dollar difference between the full hourly rate of pay of the lowest paid men in the plant and the women. in addition, the male 'floor boys' started at a higher rate of pay and achieved the maximum rate after one year; the women did not achieve their full rate until they had been with the company for two years.* the steel plate examiners local was, therefore, demanding a 29.2% increase which would have given them parity with the lowest paid male workers in the plant. during negotiations and until the local went on strike in october, they had only received an offer of 3 12.8% by the company. but the strike was more than a strike about a specific wage increase. it was a strike about equal pay and as a result it became (somewhat after the fact) a 'cause celebre' for women's groups inside and outside the labour movement in ontario. but this was the first strike in which the steel plate examiners local had ever been involved in their 4 thirty year history at the plant. the women, therefore, were fairly inexperienced in organizing for a strike. more importantly, however. because the political significance of their demands were not immediately apparent to them, they did not exploit to their advantage the broader political support of women which might otherwise have been available *stecl plate (examiners started at $3.75/hr., reaching a maximum of $5.00/hr. a^tcr two years. 23 co them. for this, and several other reasons which will be discussed later, the strike was not very successful in meeting their immediate demands. in particular, it did not succeed in changing the company's opposition to recognizing the local's claim to parity with the male workers. the women went back to work after nine weeks, having only obtained the agreement of the company to submit the dispute to arbitration. on april 13, 1978, owen shime, the arbitrator in the case, made his decision in favour of the company's original offer of 12.8% retroactive to may 1977. in view of the terms of reference of the case, the reasoning behind shime's decision seemed dubious to the counsel for the union and it was decided to submit the decision to judicial review. but the counsel later advised against this because it was felt that the chances of a reversal of the decision would be limited. instead, it was decided to put the case before the canadian human rights commission, which had coiie into being in january 1979 to act as a tribunal court on alleged contraventions of the canadian bill of rights. the decision to go this route was made because it could be argued that the company was contravening clause 11 of the federal bill of rights which provides for non-discrimination in pay on the basis of equal pay for work of equal . 6 value. although the company's main customer is the bank of canada, it was not at all clear whether the labour relations of this company would be held to fall within federal or provincial jurisdiction. nor was it clear whether the canadian bill of rights would take precedence ovt-r provincial legislation in labour relations. on february 26, 1980, the huaan rights tribunal decided 'with regret' that because the labour relations of the company did not fall under federal jurisdiction, the 24 equal pay clause in the canadian bill of rights could not apply. since the minister of labour for the province of ontario had already ruled before the strike commenced that the women were "not performing substantially similar work" to the men in the plant, the matter had not been put to the ontario human rights commission. for the future, therefore, the steel plate examiners have only two avenues open to them to improve their present position to rely on their own bargaining strength with the company or, together with the opposition parties and labour and women's pressure groups in the province, to put pressure on the government to change the legislation. in terms of the women themselves and the sustained effort which was demanded of them over the period of 2'-j years the outcome was more than just an economic setback, it was a defeat which struck at their own self respect as working women. as a result, the impetus for future 8 struggle around the issue in their local was seriously stunted. in terms of the industrial relations and legal systems within which these women were involved for that 2*s years, there exist serious barriers to the attainment of equal pay which" appear to be insuperable. these barriers exist for any group of women working in job 'ghettos' who seek to obtain equal pay for work of equal value through the collective bargaining process. an understanding of the structural barriers within the collective bargaining route tr~ the attainment of equal pay for work of equal value is essential if these are to be overcome for that goal to be reached. it is proposed in this paper, therefore, to examine in greater detail the collective bargaining/industrial relations process and the political appeal process as these affected the outcome of this specific case. while it will be difficult to generalize beyond this particular case 25 to any ocher case as to the final outcome, many of the same structural barriers and sets of assumptions that he behind these processes will exist in most collective bargaining situations. the case study 1. collective bargaining (a) the workplace, the company and its employees the british american bank note company is engaged in the business of engraving and printing of high security material such as bank notes, postage stamps, lottery tickets, share certificates and travellers cheques. the ottawa plant prints mainly bank notes and postage stamps and it is the only one of its four subsidiaries which operates the steel 9 plate presses. the company has been in operation since 1866 and was incorporated in 1909. it was in the control of the estate of the founder until 1929 when these holdings were bought out privately. shares were not offered on the stock exchange until 1945. since 1967 the company has been involved in a number of acquisitions and takeovers and has recently experienced expansion in sales and profits. in 1978 the company's net income increased by 45z. in the same year, sdes were up by 232. similarly, for the first 6 months of 1979, profits rose by 42z and sales by 211. in constant dollars, the company's earnings per share rose from $1.68 in 1974 to s^.62 in 1978 while in the same period profits rose from $754,000 to $2,528,000. the company is. therefore, a growing concern and it attributes this growth to "an expansion of the company's product base plus increased productive efficiency . the company has only one other major competitor, the canadian bank note company, also based in ottawa. 26 local 31 of the steel plate examiners is made up of 24 women whose average seniority at the company was 17 years at the time of the strike. the turnover of workers, therefore, is low and this is an 12 acknowledged asset to the company. the local is part of the international plate printers, die strippers and engravers union whose head office is in the u.s. the union has no full time personnel in ottawa and the locals have traditionally maintained a great deal of autonomy from the international and its other locals in bargaining. * 'phe steel plate examiners have also historically negotiated separately from the printers local and the five other unions in the plant. they have, however, negotiated jointly with the steel plate exaraiiers at the canadian 14 bank note company. these women are also members of local 31. working in pairs or threes, the r.xarainer's job consists of examining sva stacking the printed material as it comes off the presses. the fxatniner removes defective work and at the same rime, from about six possible problem areas connected with the specialized process, attempts to diagnose what might be causing the defect. if it is considered serious enough, the lxaminer is responsible for signalling problems to the printer or for stopping the press in order to rectify the problem. the steel plate examiners have first responsibility for determining whether the product is acceptable. failure to correct an error may result in excessive spoilage or damage to the machine. another group of workers, the graphic artists, carry out a later, more detailed examination of the printed material but they have nothing to do with the printing process itself. this group of workers is also made up of women and their rate of pay was the same as that of the examiners. these workers are members of the graphic artists international, local 'iss. 27 besides checking the printed material, the examiner is sometimes called upon to place tissue sheets between printed sheets. the presses deliver between 25 and 60 sheets per minute depending on the type of material printed and the press which is in use. the work was described by the arbitrator as "of a fatiguing nature". the basic training for the examiner is on the job training working with an experienced lxamimr. after three months the employee may work alone on the simpler processes or on a less demanding job and will then be moved gradually to more difficult work. an examiner is expected to be proficient after one year although the full rate of pay is not reached until after two years on the job. the company employs about 250 hourly paid workers at its ottawa plant and with the exception of one unrepresented group they are represented by 6 unions and covered by 11 separate collective agreements. the unions and the company, therefore, are engaged in a multiple collective bargaining situation with both skilled and unskilled workers. although this kind of craft bargaining situation can result in f.iirly established relationships between the rates of pay of the crafts, their helpers, apprentices and journeymen, pay differentials between the steel plate examiners and other semi-skilled and unskilled workers in the plant had widened in recent years. although the arbitration decision placed the main portion of the blame for this with the examiner's union and their ineffectiveness in bargaining, the women themselves argued that the differentials were the result of discriminatory hiring and training practices of the company. the company, thev argued, hired women only for training into the position of steel i'late l.xaminer. in addition, until the post arbitration period, women had not been giv«n the opportunity to apply for positions in the plant then held by men, such as printer's helper or porter. 28 there also seems to huve been nn attempt on the part of the company to control the labour market in tiie area. the job is fairly specialized and few similar jobs exist in the ottawa area but the women alleged that there was an unofficial agreement with the canadian bank note company not to hire each other's employees. because of the lack of mobility both inside and outside the firm, one possible explanation for the maintenance of wage discrimination inside the company was that it was able to take advantage of this situation to impose starting wages and wage settlements below those obtained in dollar terms by male workers. b) collective bargaining the one year collective agreement between the company and the union was due to expire in april 1977. in february 1977, under the terms of the agreement, the local notified the company of its intention to negotiate a new collective agreement in which "equal wages with the men on the floor" would be the central issue. at the same time, the local requested that joint negotiations be held with the canadian bank note company. the male workers with whom the women of local 31 were comparing themselves in their negotiations belonged to the lowest paid group of the ottawa printing specialties and paper products union. these workers were designated as "porters, paper handlers and cleaners" by the company and referred to as "porters" and "floor boys" by the women. the higher categories within this union were classed into three grades designated by the company as building maintenance workers. as of april 1977, the pry range for the lowest classified workers in this union was between $5.11 19 ard $6.26 and for the highest it was between $6.48 and $6.89. a second group of male workers with whom the women subsequently compared themselves during the arbitration process were the printer s 29 helpers, also members of the printers international union. these workers received two years on the job training and the rate of pay ranged from 20 $6.17 to $9.59 an hour after two years. the collective agreements of the other bargaining groups in the company were also due to expire at the beginning of may. the company agreed to commence bargaining with local 31 as all the other negotiations would hang on che outcome. the company's initial offer to all bargaining units was 8%. local 31 rejected this. by the middle of may negotiations seemed to be going nowhere and the president of local 31, shirley cooligan, wrote to the employment standards branch of the ontario ministry of labour asking them to investigate the matter as a case of wage discrimination on the basis of sex. the reply from the ministry indicated that because the women were not doing substantially similar work as the men, the matter did not fall under the ontario labour standards act. the ministry advised the local to pursue their goals through collective bargain4 21 ing. a conciliator was called in during the summer but neither the company nor the union was willing to move from their positions. as the possibility of a strike seemed to be no longer just a threat, in september the company increased its offer to 10% to all bargaining units, with an additional 2.8% to the examiners and the graphic artists from january. the graphic artists accepted this two-stage offer and the other all male bargaining units in the plant followed suit. the examiners at both companies again refused the offer because it did nothing to meet their demands for parity with the lowest paid male workers. a week before the strike was due to be called in mid-october, the company threatened to withdraw the usual retroactive pay clause if the local went out on strike. when it became obvious that thev would so either have to accept the company's latest offer or go out on strike and risk losing their back pay, the examiners from the canadian bank note company voted to accept their employer's latest offer which was the same as that of the british american bank note company. the acceptance of the two-stage pay increase by the graphic artists and later by the examiners from the canadian bank note company not only isolated the examiners at the british american bank note company in their strike action and rendered it much less effective than it might otherwise have been, but it also jeopardized their case in the arbitration hearing. the british american bank note company made the case that the examiners had requested joint bargaining with the canadian bank note company. because the workers there had accepted their employer's latest offer, it was questionable, argued the company, whether the higher claims of the british american employees were legitimate. but the fact was that negotiations were never actually carried on jointly. the tvo companies seem to have made the same offer to both sets of workers and the local, as far as possible until the strike was called, maintained a unified bargaining position. in early october 1977, the examiners at the british american bank note company were in a legal position to strike and they voted to do so on october 14, with the explicit demand that this was a strike for 22 equal pay for work of equal value. c) the strike the strike lasted for nine weeks and the picket line was 'manned' every day and night during that period. the women received only $25.00 a week in strike pay and this was due to run out after the tenth week. although the plant was never at any time completely shut down during the strike, production slowed down considerably after a few weeks. this was largely because the printers refused to cooperate with the 31 company in putting two men on each press, one of whom, it was intended, should perform the examiner's tasks. although some picketing was successful in keeping out suppliers and maintenance people, in order not to alienate their fellow workers. local 31 agreed that other workers in the plant could cross the picket line. the picket was not successful, however, in its main purpose of blocking the shipping out of material for delivery to the bank of canada. nor was it successful in preventing some material from being sent to the company's plant in montreal. nevertheless, because the printers refused to cooperate with the company in working with blackleg labour, production at the ottawa plant slowed down enough so that by the beginning of 23 december, the printers and several other employees were laid off. the company did not approach the union for further negotiations until the women had been on strike for two weeks, at which time they merely 2 4 repeated their previous offer. the mediator was called in on the fifth week of the strike. at this point the union understood that arbitration was not a possible alternative in this case, even though they believed that the company favoured this solution. the confusion over this was cleared up and the union and the company met with the mediator early in december to discuss the issue. the mediator later met with the union privately and indicated that they would have to spell out the terms of the arbitration very carefully if they wanted to have the case considered on the basis of equal pay. the terms were then the subject of further negotiation with the company over a period of about one week before the 25 strike was finally called off. the company had attempted to counteract the effects of the strike in two specific ways. firstly, there was an attempt to maintain production in^idr the pl.int by persuading the printers and the graphic artists 32 lo take on the l-'xaroiner s' work. when this failed because of the lark of cooperation from the printer's union, the company shipped material to its montreal plant for processing and checking. the company s strategy to obtain cooperation from other workers to help break the strike took the form of persuasion and threat. in the first instance, the company contrived to set those employees still working in the plant against the striking workers. meetings were called and letters sent to employees who were laid off 'explaining' the situation. although the all female graphic artists' union seems to have been willing to comply with the company's request, the printers' union refused to cooperate by working two men to a press. it was then suggested by the company to the printers that if the strike was allowed to continue technological changes 27 might have to be introduced, putt ing some of the printers' iobs in jeopardy. what finally persuaded the women to go back to work was their own economic hardship combined with what they knew to be the economic h.irdship of the other employees from the plant who had been laid off." the printers, for instance, were in a particularly bad situation because not only were they not receiving strike pay, but the uic had ruled that because they were members of the same international as the stnikinc employees, they were ineligible for uic payments.^ christmas was approaching and the strike pay was running out. the local voted to return to work and on december 15, the union met with the company to discuss submitting the easv. to arbitration. 2. arbitration instead of the 29.2% originally demanded durine bargaining, the local changed its demand in the arbitration brief to equal pay for work of equal value based on job evaluations drawn up by an expert from cupe. on this reckoning, the steel plate examiner's job fell between that of $3 printer's helper and the floor boy/portor and would need a 772 pay inc31 rease to give the women parity. the terms of reference of the arbitration case agreed between the union and the company, however, were somewhat ambiguous as to the question 32 of equal pay for work of equal value. in the written agreement to send the matter to arbitration dated december 17, the dispute was described as one which had "arisen out of a difference of opinion between the parties on the merits of skill and responsibility of a job with the company regardless of sex." following this preamble, the specific point for arbitration was specified as "the rate of wage to be paid to the examiners during the term of the contract." the union's brief in the arbitration case used the opening paragraph of the agreement as the definition of what the dispute was about. with the use of evaluations, therefore, the union was able to compare the jobs and the rate of pay for the examiners with that of other (male) jobs and rates of pay for the men in the plant who were closely conm-cred with the printing process. the company, on the other hand, chose to b;ise its case solely on the question of the rate of pay. in doing so they compared the examiners to the graphic artists who performed an examination function inside the plant and to workers doing similar work outside the company in the federal government or the printing industry. the arbitrator, owen shime, took the middle ground between these two positions. in doing so, he circumvented the issue of equal pav for work of equal value because he addressed the question of sex discrimination separately from that of comparability. this undermined the union's argument that the two were inevitably linked because of the 'job ghetto' situation inside the plant which had been created by the hiring ami training practices of the company. secondly, because shine argu<-d that 14 the method of job evaluation had historically not been used in collective bargaining in the printing industry, he ignored the union's calculation of where the examined job stood in relation to others at the plant. shime dealt with the comparability issue explicitly from the point of view of the traditional collective bargaining practices in the printing industry. thiitily, shime argued that the arbitration process was not a 'judgement' but an 'adjudication' based on what existed in similar jobs and situations elsewhere, and/or, if applicable, on a set of historical relationships which have been established over time. shime, therefore, ruled out the possibility that the arbitration could be a precedent setting case which would in any way alter established practices. more specifically, shime refused to accept the union's case of comparability on the basis of job evaluation for three reasons: 1) the history of bargaining in the printing industry had been 'splintered' and "the relationships among workers were not capable of being analyzed on a purely rational or objective basis." 2) the job evaluations provided by the union had been 'too selective' because they had not included the graphic artists at british american who were paid similar wages as the examiners. because the issue of pay was separated from the issue of d iscr itninat ion . he did not take up the question of job ghetto iza tion. 3) the job evaluation had not been the result of a consultative process with the company but had been unilaterally formulated by the union. while shime did not argue against the union's case that the company, because of its profitable record, had the ability to pay the wage demanded, he agreed with the company that its competitive position had to be taken into account and that the settlement of a 77% wage demand could jeopardise this. although the companydid not fall within the terms of reference of the aib, it also made the case in its brief that because 35 wage and price controls were in effect in canada at that time, a wage settlement above the norm set by the anti-inflation board regulations would b« inflationary and irresponsible. 36 addressing the question of discrimination, shime agreed with the ontario ministry of labour that the work was 'not similar' to that of the male workers. he argued in fact that the work of the floor boys was 'dirtier' than that of the examiners and this could account for the difference in wages. in this context, the usual criteria of skill and responsibility were ignored. in his concluding remarks, shime argued that while there was inconsistency in the wage rates of the floor boys and the examiners, this was not necessarily evidence of discrimination on the part of the company. instead, he made two kinds of argument which, while it attributed the difference in pay to the collective bargaining process, also placed the solution in that arena. firstly, the work force in the industry is splintered into multiple bargaining units which of itself produces inconsistency in wage bargaining. since this occurs elsewhere under similar conditions, he argued, inconsistency was nor unusual and was not evidence of discrimination. secondly, the wage rate of the 'floor boys' could be' accounted for by more effective collective bargaining on the part of their union. the solution to the widening differentials and the different rates of pay between the two sets of workers, therefore, lay in the collective bargaining process. on this question shime took a similar position to that of the ontario ministry of labour. the onu;; was quite clearlv put upon the steel plate examiners' local and the printer's union to bargain more effectively on behalf of the women. furthermore, shime accepted the company's argument that in comparison with the rraphlc artists at the company and other examiners at the bank v, of canada and the federal government, as well as in other printing establishments elsewhere, the wagi> offered to the steel plate examiners was 'a fair one'. again the question of job ghettos—whether the examiners at the other plants were also women or predominently womin--was not addressed, nor could it be under the terms of reference which the arbitrator had set for himself. shime also accepted the company's argument that because the offer of 12.8% had been accepted by the steel plate examiners at the canadian bank note company as a result of the "normal, bilateral bargaining and decisionmaking process", the charge of discrimination on the basis of sex could not be upheld. the union's argument , that the women at the canadian bank note company had made their own decision to accept the offer of ] 2 . 8% after an assessment of the possibilities of winning a strike, was discounted. on the one hand, shime argued that it was up to the union to rectify the problem of widening wage differentials and ensure that it was not a party to an agreement which contravened the labour relations act forbidding discriminatory bargaining practices. on the other hand, he argued that "the process of making the decision about wage rates was bilateral, and it is reasonable to infer that it was arrived at in the normal collective bargaining process after a relative assessment of bargaining strength, including the willingness of the members to withdraw their services." on the basis of these arguments the arbitrator's decision was in favour of the company's original offer to the union of 12.8%. 3. the political and legal processes a) political pressure after being notified by the ontario ministry of labour that the ontario legislation would not cover their case, the executive of local 31 went beyond the collective bargaining process in an attempt to bring polit37 ical pressure to bear on the company both during and after the negotiat ions. contact was made with the clc and the ofl, both of whom made unsuccessful attempts tc change the situation. shirley carr, vice president of the ci.c, appealed to the then minister of labour bette stephenson to put a wider interpretation on the implementation of the ontario human rights act. the ofl convention which was held during the strike voted to make representation to the government to amend the ontario legislation. 39 because of the federal government's connection with the company, appeals were made by the clc to the federal minister of labour, john munro, to put pressure to bear on the company to change its bargaining position. ottawa ndp mla's evelyn cigantes and ndp provincial leader michael cassldy both raised questions in the ontario legislature on the issue of the need 40 to change the present legislation. the matter was later taken up by the ndp through a private member's bill. this was defeated in committee in early 1980. u most of the political pressure and lobbying activity was reported in the media at the time of the strike ,-ind while it made the case something of a 'cause celebre' it served little to change the situation for the steel plate examiners. since the company was not directly involved in selling to the public, adverse publicity of this kind could have little impact. although the publicity served to drum up some financial support for the strikers from women's groups across the province, most of this arrived after the strike had ended. initially, the executive of the local had been reluctant to take the issue outside the union movement and it was particularly reluctant to rake what it conxtdited to he an extreme militant position, for example. by expanding their picket line to include women's nroups or to a 1 low the issue to become the focus of mass demonstrations or meetings. although the women had been aware in the early stages of the strike that political pressure might be needed to change the company's bargaining position, this was seen in terms of the legitimate channels of the democratic political process—letters to mp's, lobbying by recognized pressure groups (the clc, ofl) and raising the matter with the political parties in opposition at queen's park. 44 while it was unsuccessful in terms of the examiners' specific case, the political pressure did have some repurcussions, however. in early 1980, the ontario minister of labour upgraded the employment standards branch inspectorate by hiring 11 more inspectors in an effort to remove the onus of complaint from the individual employee. as a result, within the first few weeks of the new program, several new cases of wage discrimination were uncovered in the province, even though the branch is still operating under the original terms of reference of 'equal pay for similar work . premier davis, under pressure from womnn in his own party on the issue, in the spring of 1980 promised a new conservative bill which would address the issue of equal pay for work of equal value. in malcing this announcement, however, he cautioned that implementation of this kind of legislation could be difficult. given the government's previous record with its existing legislation, the warning is probably appropriate, b) the human rights commission the strike ended in december 1977. in january 1978, the federal government's human rights commission came into operation. during the course of the strike .quest ions had been raised in parliament about the federal government's responsibility in the case because section 11 39 of the canadian human rights act bases sex discrimination in wages on equal pay for work of equal value. cordon fairweather, the chairman of the commission, had issued a statement indicating that if the strike was not settled when the commission came into operation in january 1978. the commission would examine the case. although he indicated at that time that the company's affairs fell under provincial jurisdiction, because the company did a large amount of its business with the federal government through the bank of canada, it could be argued that it was a government contractor. in this case, the human rights act had provisions in section 19 for the governor in council "to make recommendations respecting the terms and conditions to be included in or applicable to any contract, licence or grant."" questioned on the possibility of using this provision in the commons, prime minister trudeau replied that this would be "a completely incorrect procedure." "as a matter of principle we do not encourage third parties to involve themselves in disputes by exercising any kind of economic boycott. it seemed unlikely, therefore, that fairweather 's willingness to take up the issue on the basis of the government's contractual position and its responsibility under the act would nor receive the necessary cabinet backing. nevertheless, when the arbitration failed to meet the union'-; demands, instead of proceeding with a judicial review of the case, which was initially planned, the union decided to leave the matter in the hands of the federal human rights commission. the hearing took place in december 1979 and judgement in the case was handed down in march 1980 . the tribunal arrued, firstly, th.it the nature of the act was human rights, clearly d if f erent iat lf)r it from the 40 narrower aspects of labour legislation. secondly, they argued that the unintended scope of the canadian human rights act had been fairly narrowly defined by parliamentary discussion when it was enacted. during parliamentary debate on the issue it was clear that the act was not intended to have wide ranging constitutional jurisdiction under civil law. even here, the residual powers of the "peace, order and good government" clause of the british north america act had not been invoked which might have ensured that the act had universal applicability in canada. the human rights act specifically stares that the legislation is to "extend the present laws in canada to give effect, within a purview of matters coming within the legislative authority of the parliament of canada." this was interpreted by the tribunal to mean that the act only applies to enterprises falling under federal jurisdiction and that it should not be seen as "an attemor to supplant existing provincial legislation in the field, but rather to supplement it by filling in some of the gaps left by it." giveii this rather narrow interpretation of the scope of the act, the tribunal had to decide, it was argued, whether the business of the british american bank note company fell under provincial or federal jurisdiction in the matter of human rights. basing their discussion on two precedent cases, it was argued that while the control of paper money, which was the major part of the company's business, was clearly a matter of federal competence, it could not be argued on this basis that the employment practices of the company also fell under federal jurisdiction in respect to human rights. the employment practices of the company were already covered by the ontario human rights act and by ontario labour legislation and there could only 41 be a basis for supplementing this legislation if the practices of the company's operation in other than actual bank note production amounted to discrimination in their provision of services to the general public. since the company's employmen t practices did not come into the specific category of the actual issuing of paper money (such as banking) which would have placed it in the category of the federal government's incidental control, it was decided that the matter of wage discrimination in this case did not come within the powers of the tribunal. in making its decision, the tribunal reasoned the case on the basis of precedents which, although they were about employment, were not argued in terms of human rights but in terms of the constitutionality of the question. the question of human rights, therefore, was clearly viewed as subordinate to the question of constitutional jurisdiction. while it could be argued that the tribunal was unnecessarily narrow in its interpretation of the scope of the act, it was constrained by political realities. the tribunal itself acknowledged the act's weak position both legally and constitutionally by suggesting several ways in which, given the will to do so, parliament could have expanded the act's efficacy and 52 jurisdiction. it has already been noted that, in theory, under the terms of the act, the federal government had the power to act. but that it did not do so. this reluctance is comprehensible in both political and economic terms. apart from the sensitive political considerations surrounding the question of federal or provincial jurisdiction in this area, the federal government would have been setting a precedent with fairly broad ramifications for the labour relations system in the private sector if it had extended the concept of equal pay for work of equal 12 value to include companies with any kind of contractual relations with the federal government. the political repurcussions would have been even greater, however, if the human rights tribunal had not been careful to differentiate the human rights aspects of the act's power from thst of labour legislation. the human rights commission is now in the process of appealing the tribunal's decision in the supreme court of appeal. civen, however, the fairly weak position of the act constitutionally and legally, and the politically ascendant position of provincial jurisdictions in recent years, it is unlikely that a decision coming down in favour of the commission's case will remain unchallenged by the province of ontario or the company. conclusions the above case study has documented one instance in which equal pay for work of equal value became the explicit demand of a union in the process of a collective bargaining situation. but the strike was to all intents spd purposes defeated. although the organizational structure of the unions in the plant was in part to blame for both the discrepency in pay and for the failure of the strike, it is also clear that the defeat was only possible because the issue was either obscured or deflected by the processes and ideological discourse within which the issue was fought out. this 'mystification' of the real issue of the value of women's work, however, raises contradictions, which upon examination, become very apparent. while the union was defeated on the issue in this specific instance, the kind of demands they were making will not go down into historical oblivion. for many women inside and outside the labour movement, it has served as yet another example of the limitations of the 43 present legislation in ontario. but more than this, a close examination of the structure and ideology of collective bargaining reveals the full weight of the kind of barriers which must be overcome if women are to achieve equal pay in practice. concretely, the reasons for the failure of the examiners to achieve their goals within the collective bargaining and industrial relations system are obviously complex. as far as the local itself was concerned, these related to both organizational and ideological factors. it seems that the women had only relatively recently begun to feel justified in demanding equal pay. indeed, the initial demands were not for equal pay for work of equal value but only for parity with the lowest paid men in the plant. even here, there was some reluctance on the part of the other all-female local at the plant to support local 31 in this demand. although all the women in local 31 supported the strike in principle, it seems to have been a relatively small group within the local who felt strongly enough about the issue to take on the tasks of organization. there seems to have been a profound sense among this group of women that the situation at the plant was intolerable. having voiced their grievances to fellow workers on a number of occasions, they were taunted by some of the male workers for seeming to be unable 53 to do anything about their situation. their demand only became one for 'equal pay for work of equal value' after the strike had commenced and their attempts to close the gap in pay using existing means were fruitless. in the arbitration case, the union took up the principle of equal pay for work of equal value because it was the only logical way to present thdr case .which rested on comparability with the male workers. this demand was one which evolved as confrontation proceeded a.nd the issue became more clear. this unplanned approach to 14 a politically sensitive aril yet powerful issue had both advantages and disadvantages. it meant on the one hand that the strike had not been designed specifically to challenge the legislation. this 'political innocence' and the fact that the women were prepared to work within the existing legislation and structures served to highlight the inadequacy of the ontario legislation in a way which a more politically motivated strike might not have done. partly because of the local's autonomy in decision making, the nature of their demands developed spontaneouslv. while there were drawbacks in the lack of strategy, it also meant that there were few constraints on tailoring their strategy in the interests of the long-term. thus, by the time the strike was over, the issue and its real nature had been brought into clear focus, not only for the women themselves but for a broader public who were fcllowing the case, by the apparent audacity of their claim. on the other hand, the lack of planning and of a clear strategy also meant that there were loopholes in making a consistent case before the arbitrator which gave the company the opportunity to argue that the local's demands were inconsistent and unreasonable. the high degree of autonomy enjoyed by the local may also, in the long run, have worked against them. owen shime was perhaps correct in claiming that the union itself was in part to blame for the situation in which the women initially found themselves. the international seems to have done little or nothing to remeay what had been a fairly longstanding practice of hiring and wage discrimination by the employer. although the strike was legally recognized by the international and the women received a small amount of strike pay for the duration of the strike, they were left to themselves to organize and drum up support for the strike both inside 45 and outside the plant. local 31, like several of the other locals at the plant, is part of an old international craft union. these unions have traditionally taken little interest in 'politicizing' their members or putting their weight behind issues which take on an overt political content. the fact that the strike took place in a craft union shop placed not only organizational, but ideological, constraints on the polit icization of the issue inside and outside the plant. solidarity amongst the women in the plant was not uniformly maintained and the multi-union situation did not help to create it, but tended rather to foster competition between the two all-female locals. when the collective bargaining process failed, the issue was brought into the political arena. as discussed earlier, the women in the local initially had a great deal of confidence in the democratic political process and they were not reticent about trying to make their complaints heard. but they tended to see politics only in institutional terms. protest was directed through established pressure groups or members of parliament. such overt political action as there was was planned in accordance with this view. there was little appreciatbn on th'e part of the local that lobbying the ndp or liberal opposition parties at queen's park or writing to the local mla was unlikely to effect an immediate change in the ontario law or its implementation on their behalf. the other side of the coin to the obstacles created by the union organizational structure and the lack of strategy was the collective bargaining and arbitration process itself. as is clear from shiroe's report, this took place within a set of ideological assumptions about what constitutes a 'just' or 'fair' wage. within the discourse of collective bargaining and the industrial relations system, a wage which has been bargained for is, by definition, a fair one. according to the labour practices act, only where a union knowingly accepts a discriminatory wage rate is such a wage considered discriminatory. although it was recognized that the bargaining strength of a particular union can in reality vary and that this would have implications for the outcome, this was not considered to be an argument which justified intervention to rectify unequal or discriminatory wage practices on the part of the arbitrator. the onus, therefore, to achieve a 'fair wage' was placed entirely with the union. in other words, the structure of collective bargaining itself, for the purposes of reaching an arbitration decision, was considered to be a situation in which the union and the employer meet as equals. within thp discourse of the industrial relations system, therefore, collective bargaining is extracted from the unequal relationship which exists structurally between capital and labour and is assumed to take place between equals. the findings of this case study have immediate practical implications for the women's movement. but the case study also raises interesting questions for further study by sociologists. has the present ontario legislation, for instance, contributed to the problem of job ghettoization because one means of getting around the legislation is through discriminatory hiring and training practices? to what extent does the structure and practice of trade unions help to maintain job ghettos? to what extent is it possible that the demand for equal pav for work of equal value could present a challenge to the pattern of rewards which now exist in society, and what are the implications of this? these are just some of the quest ions which might be pursued by those interested in further research in this area. 47 but there are also practical lessons to be drawn from this case study. firstly, women in the union movement must learn tc work and fight together for equal pay. traditional, particularistic, union or trade interests and loyalties must be re-examined in the light of the equal pay principle. this may mean struggles will emerge within unions and between unions as much as they do with employers. secondly, women cannot afford to rely solely on the legislative process to change their situation. legislation must be interpreted and put to the test before its effectiveness can be judged. more progressive legislation can only back-up militant and united union struggle for the abolition of wage discrimination in practice at the work place. 18 footnotes 1 besides the federal llumnn rights legislation, b.c. and quebec do not limit equal pay rights to the same work. but there are constraints in both provinces on the universal application of equal pay for work of equal value. see lynn mcdonald, "equal pay-how far off?" c anadian dimension , vol. 14, no. 6, 1980. 2 see jule white, women in unions , ottawa: advisory council on the status of women, 1980, for statistical information on women in unions in canada. 3 affidavit of shirley cooligan, president of local 31, steel plate examiners union, august 2, 1978. 4 union brief to arbitration hearing. february 7, 1978. 5 arbitration decision of mr. owen shime, april 13, 1978. 6 interview with lynn kaye, counsel for the union, april 1980. 7 the decision of the canadian human rights tribunal, februarv 26, 1980, p. 19. 8 interview with shirley cooligan, former president of local 3 1 , steel plate examiners union, april 1980. 9 the details of the company's operations were taken from f>ven shime's arbitration decision, op . c i t . 10 the details of the company's financial position were taken from the financial post corporations service, revised edition, december, 1979, 11 union brief to arbitration hearing, february 7, 1978. 12 interview with personnel officer at british american bank note co., april 1980. 13 other than strike pay, the international did very little to help the local win its strike or the arbitration. in the latter case the local received considerable help from cupe. 14 arbitration decision, op.cit . 15 this description of the work and the workplace is based on the union brief, the company's brief and the arbitration decision, op . c i t 16 interview with shirley cooligan and maureen mckenney, january 1978 . 17 this does not account for the genesis of wage discrimination. in an interview with the ottawa journal in december 1977, r.p. white, vice chairman of the company is quoted as saying that "it wastraditional in the industry for men and women to be segregated in different unions and job categories." he also observed that a lot of women were second wage earners but contended that this was 'hot a reason why they received lower wages." 18 letter dated february 25, 1977, from maureen mckenney, secretary of the local to industrial relations manager at british american bank note company. 19 union brief to arbitration hearing, op . c i t . 20 ibid 21 letter from employment standards branch of the ontario ministry of labour, may 26 1977. 22 this account of the negotiations was taken from the arbitration documents and from interviews with shirley cooligan, union president and lynn kaye, the local's counsel. 23 this account is based on interviews with shirley cooligan and maureen mckenney in november 1977 and january 1978. 24 affidavit of shirley cooligan, august 2, 1978. 25 there was some confusion on the part of the union as to whether the case could legally be put to arbitration. according to cooligan the union was told during the mediation proceedings in november that the case was not eligible for arbitration. mien it was finally realized that it was, negotiations began with the company through the mediator as to the terms of reference for arbitration. 26 the company changed its trucking contractor during the strike because brinks drivers refused to cross the picket lines. the company then hired rydcrs trucking co. whose drivers crossed the picket line. 27 interviews with shirley cooligan and maureen mckenney with mr. kuiack of the printers union, november 1977. 28 many of the women in local 31 were heads of single parent families or the main bread winners in their family. 50 29 citizen , december, 1977 30 union reply to company brief to arbitration hearing 31 union brief to arbitration hearing, op.cit 32 the union made the case in its rebuttal to the company's brief that the terms of reference were clear and that they had been the point of protracted negotiations between the parties for almost a week in mid-december indicating that the intention was clear. agreement to arbitrate december 17, 1977. 33 agreement to arbitrate, december 17, 1977. 34 arbitration decision, op . c i t . 35 ibid 36 company's brief to arbitration hearing, op.cit . 37 arbitration decision, op.cit . 38 ibid 39 press reports, november-december, 1977. 40 press reports, december 1977. 41 maclean 's magazine, april 1980. 42 interview with shirley cooligan and maureen mckenney, january 1978. 43 discussion with shirley cooligan in late october, 1977. 44 ibid 45 citizen , april 1980. 46 davis stated that he favoured a program of affirmative action. this largely skirts the problem of wage discrimination in iob ghettos by concentrating on upgrading the skills of a united number of women. the solution is thus individualized. ( i t izen , april 15, 1980. 47 citizen , december 1977 48 ibid 49 the canadian human rights act, tribunal decision, february 26, 1980. si 50 the cases used as precedents were construction montcalm vs. minimum wage commission and one which was referred to as the steevedoring case. counsel for the respondent made his case on the former while the commission's counsel made his case on the latter. both cases concerned the question of federal or provincial jurisdiction over labour relations for firms whose operations included some connection with areas of federal jurisdiction, e.g., aeronautics and shipping. 51 the tribunal's decision was based on the montcalm case in which justice baetz had argued that although the company was engaged in operations (the construction of an airport) which clearly came under federal jurisdiction, its employee relations were fundamentally an integral part of these operations and therefore this came under provincial jurisdiction. 52 tribunal decision, op.cit . 53 based on interviews with shirley cooligan and maureen mckenney october 1977, november 1977 and january 1978. trade unions and the state: an interpretative essay on the historical development of class and state relations in canada, 1889 1947 daniel glenday and christopher schrenk introduction this essay investigates the interaction between the canadian state and trade unions during the first half of this century primarily in terms of the political incorporation of trade unions in canada. the basis of our investigation is the work of those theorists who spoke to the importance of the state and trade unions under advanced capitalism and whose familiarity in this area aided our historical exploration. we discovered that incorporation of canada's unions was an uneven process with the federal level taking the lead over the provincial. we conclude by expanding on certain notions of the state and the role trade unions play within advanced capitalism. theories stressing the limits and possibilities of trade union action in capitalist societies can be subsumed under two broad categories. first, what might broadly be termed the sociological tradition was founded upon such writers as s. perlman (1928) in the united states and sidney and beatrice webb (1902) in the united kingdom. more recently, a group based at the berkeley institute of industrial relations and which included such noted academics as daniel bell, r. dubin, clark kerr, s.m. lipset and a.m. ross came to dominate the field in the 1950 ' s and 1960 ' s . in britain as well there are many theorists who belong in this tradition. some, such as alan fox (1974) and j.h. goldthorpe (1974) are more 'radical' in their approach while others like h.a. clegg (1951), a. flanders (1965), h.a. turner (1962), g.s. bain (1970), to mention only a few, remain more "liberal" in their orientation. second, there is the marxist tradition which 114 trade unions and the state includes revolutionaries such as k. marx, a. grams ci , r. luxemburg, v. lenin and l. trotsky. it is represented today by a growing number of young practioners, mostly, though not exclusively, from great britain: robin blackburn (1967), victor allen (1972), richard hyman (1971) and perry anderson (1967). the sociological approach the dominant sociological approach centres on the changing dynamics of class consciousness and class conflict under advanced capitalism. distilling from the literature, we can outline at least five major interrelated propositions. first, industrialization is depicted as a modernizing trend which will eventually eliminate vestiges of traditional institutions and values. in other words, the secular will come to replace the sacred. second, as michael mann (1973: 10) notes with reference to the "end of ideology" theorists, their "central tenet would be that there is an inherent strain in the industrialization process toward the compromise of class interests and the institutionalization of conflict." third, once institutionalized, class conflict becomes isolated or fragmented into separate spheres of dispute. this is due to an argument that sees the institutionalization of conflict necessarily involving the isolation of economic from political action. as mann further argues "the institutionalization of industrial conflict is nothing more nor less than the narrowing down of conflict to aggressive economism and defensive control" (mann, 1973: 21). in addition, it is held that such conflict is so fragmented that it no longer threatens social stability but becomes a functional part of 2 society. put another way, the segmentation of life in advanced capitalist society constitutes an obstacle to the realization of class consciousness (dunlop: 1958). fourth, the rising standard of living or working class affluence in advanced industrial societies inevitably 115 alternate routes leads to a decline in conflict. and, finally, the working class is reasonably content with its lot and exhibits little indication of alienation, deprivation or socialist consciousness. trade unions enter the picture as reducing the class nature of the conflict by focusing almost exclusively on economistic or instrumental demands. they represent the organization apparatus which has plugged into the complicated web of government and business agencies, boards and committees. although it varies from industry to industry, general 1y the older the labour union, the more complete the institutionalization of class conflict would be, thereby reducing the necessity for the organization to exhibit a radical political content. the process of institutionalization is never complete. the sociological explanation for why this happens can be reduced to two root factors. first, we must consider the particular characteristic of each national economy; this includes the important differences in the industrial segments of mining, and manufacturing, and the service sector which, in turn, result in variations in the level of legitimate trade union involvement in the national economy. second, employers of labour become critical components in the working out of the role of trade unions under capitalism. as employer attitudes change away from what richard lester has called the "commodity concept" of employment to the "welfare concept", a reduction in the intensity and violence of industrial conflict results. on the other hand, the reverse is also true. class conflict will intensify if the employer refuses to play by the rules of the game which include trade union recognition and collective bargaining (ingham: 1974: 16). the major thrust of the sociological approach characterizes capitalist social relations as tending towards the isolation of conflict into separate industrial disputes and the narrowing of lift trade unions and the state conflict to aggressive economism provided the employer will play the game. in all, compromise and sectoral conflict are seen to be the dominant tendencies which bear on the problem of trade unions under advanced capitalism. the marxist tradition the sociological approach has indeed borrowed many of the ideas which were germane to the marxist tradition. a key difference is the 3 political thrust of their arguments. while the sociological approach ends with the limited or constrained political role of trade unions the marxist tradition moves in a revolu tionary direction while at the same time acknowledging certain limitations to trade union action under capitalism. the limitations of trade union action under capitalism were seen to be the result of the fact that trade unions crystal li zed or institution alized the existence of the working class in the factory. they did not transcend capitalist social relations. trade unions were the expression of class relations and as such would become a prisoner of them. consequently, as lenin came to argue, the labour movement by itself can only develop trade union consciousness that is, "the conviction that it is necessary to combine in unions, fight employers and strive to compel the government to pass necessary labour legislation" (1967: 117). such consciousness, he argues, cannot transcend the existing social structure without the intervention of a revolutionary party. socialism as the political generalization of immediate economic interests had to be learned, and it was up to the party cadres to become the active participants within the working class to bring about the desired goal. we do not intend to go into any detail on the historical experiences which led most revolutionaries to this position, nor will we delve into the important differences in strategy and tactics within this 117 alternate routes tradition. the problematic of the contracted political role of trade unions under advance capitalism is shared by both the marxist and sociological traditions each of which provides some indication as to why this has occurred. what distinguishes the marxist tradition from the sociological approach centers on the theoretical analysis of the exploitive relationship between capitalists and workers. the inherently antagonistic interests between the two great classes of capitalism rest on the appropriation of surplus value by capitalists from the working class. therefore, the incorporation of the working class and its organizations can only be of limited success. the fundamental contradiction still remains and is a constant source of conflict for the system as a whole (hyman, 1975: 68, 96, 103). one, but by no means the only marxist to contribute to the understanding of this problematic was leon trotsky. just before his assassination he was investigating the question of the role of trade unions under late ...capitalism (1975). he added certain dimensions to the study of this problem by stressing trade union bureaucratization and the "growing together" of "modern trade union organizations throughout the i world" with the state (1975: 68). he saw this process as being "equally characteristic of the neutral, the social democratic, the communist and the anarchist trade unions" because it derived from "social conditions common to all unions" (1975: 68-69). as with lenin, these common social conditions were seen to stem from the emergence of monopoly capitalism which forced trade unions to "confront a centralized capitalist adversary, intimately bound up with state power". as such, trade unions "insofar as they remain on reformist positions, i.e. on positions of adapting themselves to private property (must) adapt themselves to the capitalist state and ...contend for its cooperation" (1975: 69). unlike the sociological approach which made impressionistic 118 trade unions and the state references to the impact of industrialization on trade unions and the changing attitudes of employers, trotsky stressed the centralizing tendencies of capital and its connections with the state. this facilitated boththe consolidation of trade union organizations and their bureaucratization, a process which hyman (1971) refers to as trotsky's thesis of incorporation . here trotsky, more explicitly than lenin, encompasses in his examination the intentional strategies of industry and the state. he notes, how, particularly in periods of economic and political 'difficulty', government and leaders of large corporate enterprises deliberately plan to integrate trade unions into state structures thereby mitigating threats from below to the dominance of capital. while government and industry viewed positively an incorporated. and therefore more easily regulated and controlled labour force, the trade union leadership, for its own bureaucratic reasons also favoured such a development. trade union leaders would see their primary task as "freeing the state from the embrace of capitalism, in weakening its dependence on trusts, in pulling it over to their side" (1975: 69). in this manner, they mistakenly believed the "independence" of trade unions would be assured and a better deal for the workers could be extracted form the profits of monopoly capitalism. reformist leaders using their authority gained by "delivering the goods" in periods of expansion now function to condone, if not promote, this strategy. "implicit in this argument," says hyman (1971: 18), "is the thesis of incorporation: that union leaders, having acquired authority over their 4 members, are used to assist capitalism in controlling the workers." in a period of capitalist decline and crises, trotsky predicted that trade unions could move in one of two directions, either to serve as "secondary instruments of capitalism for the subordination and disciplining of workers or, on the contrary, the trade unions could 119 alternate routes become the instruments of the revolutionary movement of the proletariat" (1975: 71). the tendency (not "iron law"), towards incorporation differs fundamentally from the notion of the institutionalization of conflict discussed above. it is analysed as a tendency which attempts to temporarily counter the dynamic of class conflict. the conflictual dynamic between the two dominant social classes within capitalism is endemic to it and remains central here as it is in all writings within the marxist tradition. it is not necessary for this short essay to deal with the criticism that trotsky did not envision the durability of capitalism after world war ii and that his projections therefore failed to include the renewed basis for reformist action in the trade unions. his analysis has shown that one fruitful avenue to explore towards understanding the limited political role of trade unions would be an historical investigation of the interaction between the state and trade unions. to this question we now turn. trade unions and the state in canada: 1889 1947 over the past three-quarters of a century, a most important development for the working class in western capi talistcountries has been the expansion of the state's involvement in the class struggle. in the pages to follow, we intend to trace the historical development of the federal and provincial government's role in incorporating trade unions into specific state structures under the domination of capital. we begin our investigation by delving into some of the background statements and past positions taken by the federal government concerning labour legislation in canada. 120 trade unions and the state the royal commissions we intend to refer to two royal commissions, the royal commission on labour and capital (1889) and the royal commission on industrial relations (1919) , both influenced by similar musings in great britain, in order to outline the government's position on organized labour. first, the royal commission on capital and labour (1889) tells us that: labour organizations are necessary to enable working men to deal on equal terms with their employers. they encourage their members to study and discuss matters affecting their interests and to devise means for the betterment of their class. it is gratifying to be assured by many competent witnesses that labour bodies discourage strikes and other disturbances in industry, favour conciliation and arbitration for the settlement of disputes, and adopt conservative and legitimate methods for promoting the welfare of the producing members of society. it is in evidence that most labour bodies strive effectively to promote temperance throughout the country, and especially among their members (emphasis added). ,two points are clear from this statement. first, "responsible" and "competent" trade unions were those which were effectively able to foster "temperance" in their membership by "discouraging strikes" and "adopting conservative and legitimate methods" to achieve their ends. the royal commissioners sought trade union leaders who were willing and able to compromise on their demands and minimize disruptive acticns by the rank and file against the sanctity of property. second, to focus on the legitimacy of trade unions as bargaining agents with capital in the era of "laissez-faire" capitalism is one indication of the farsightedness of the commissioners. the commission argued that on the basis of testimony from individuals representing all sections of canadian society, trade unions should be accepted as representing the interests of the working class. their willingness to compete for rewards wi thin the system and not against 121 alternate routes it must have compelled the commissioners to view trade unions as "responsible" agents for the working class. as such, a further explanation for the position taken by the royal commission could have been due to the fact that industrialization was still in its infancy in canada. with an eye to great britain the commissioners may have felt that the exploitation and degradation of nascent capitalism there had resulted in indiscriminate acts of vandalism and destruction by the workers (e.g. luddism). the restraints which trade union organizations could exercise over their membership may have been seen as a means of protecting property and fixed capital from those same destructive tendencies which appeared to be. inherent in early industrial capitalist development. the political logic important as that early statement may have been, it must be qualified to scne extent. not all unions were viewed in this manner by both the federal and provincial levels of the canadian government. for instance, in 1903, a royal commission on industrial disputes in british columbia emphatically stated that "foreigners" from the united states who were nothing more than "socialist agitators of the most bigoted and ignorant type" should be punished for their trade union activities. these men came to canada for no other reason than to "keep up unceasing friction between the employer and the employed." the action taken by the federal government in this matter has been neatly summarized by john crispo: "this report sparked the senate of canada to propose a similar amendment to the criminal code. although the bill was defeated by an overwhelming margin in the house of commons, a member of the senate put forward a comparable bill four years later. this time, however, it was tossed out by the senate itself. the cma (canadian manufacturers association) proposal of two years later had no better luck. this scries of defeats hardly suggests that the canadian government was prepared to make an issue 122 trade unions and the state of international unionism (1967: 292). what we see emerging is the divergent paths which the two levels of the canadian government follow when they seek to interpret and deal practically with the role of trade unions in canadian society. the federal government will come to endorse their positive role, at least in words and occasionally in deeds, while the provincial governments will not, until many bitter struggles have been waged. but, it was not simply a matter of dealing with trade unions per se which annoyed the leaders of the more industrialized provincial governments; it was also the incursion of american-based international trade unions into 'their' territory. on the other hand, the federal government's position towards international unionism appeared to be an affirmation of their role and contribution to canadian society and industry. another important event which symbolized the federal government's positive attitude towards american-based international unions came when the president of the af of l was invited to address a joint session of both houses of parliament in april, 1917. this was the first time that such an invitation had been made to any labour leader. and, that it was not a canadian but an american labour leader "must be taken as a sign of the esteem in which international unions were hel c by the government of the day" (crispo, 1967: 292). twenty years later, we hear again the echo of the spectre of international trade unionism. this time it comes from mitchell hepburn, premier of the province of ontario. in commenting on the strike between the united auto workers and general motors at oshawa, ontario in 1937, hepburn remarked: the issue is whether or not foreign agitators, who already have brought the united states to a state of anarchy, were to attain their goal of smashing our export business. we know what these agitators are up to, they are working their way into the 123 alternate routes lumber camps, the pulp mills and our mines. well, that has got to stop and we are going to stop it. if necessary, we will raise an army to do so (ware, 1937: 66-67). all of the premier's rhetoric went to no avail. besides losing the minister of labour and the attorney general over the strike, he failed to enlist the support of the federal government in this matter. mr. king showed no sympathy for mr. hepburn's position, while the dominion minister of labour, the honourable norman mcleod rogers, laid down the dominion's attitude on the rights of trade union organizers crossing the border. he said that american organizers had free entry into canada as representatives of the af of l or the c.i.o. or any other organization. the dominion government had no interest in the differences among organizations whether native or alien and was ready to offer its conciliation services on request (ware, 1937: 70-71). the history of the quebec government's attitude towards international trade unionism is probably better known and is not significantly different from ontario's or british columbia's attitudes described above. the one important qualification concerns quebec's endorsement of the catholic syndicate movement at least up to the asbestos strike. the position of the federal government at this time, in contrast to the provincial governments was certainly aimed at facilitating the incorporation of international trade unions within the political framework of canadian society. the provincial governments and the canadian manufacturers association (cma), on the other hand, lobbyed against the international trade unions. they were prepared to support national trade union organizations against the international if need be, but would have preferred not to deal with trade unions at all. why do we see bifurcation of political interests on this issue? one plausible explanation, besides the oft noted influence of british legislative precedence on the federal government, rests with the economic interests which lie beneath both levels of the state apparatus. the 124 trade unions and the state federal government was allied to finance capital and foreign, primarily u.s. controlled, international corporations (armstrong and nelles, 1973; naylor,1975). big business is not always as challenged by trade union demands as are locally based industries since it is more difficult for a trade union to paralyze a large corporation than it is to close down a small domestic one. it is also noteworthy that the financial institutions, such as the large canadian banks, were always able to thwart unionization attempts and were therefore under no serious threat from the canadian labour movement. therefore, big business can, if necessary, tolerate trade unions and in the long run may even attempt to use them to their advantage (bendix, 1956; weinstein, 1968). the provincial governments and local business present a different case. the governments of more industrialized provinces such as ontario, quebec and british columbia were more strongly influenced by smallscale domestic manufacturing industries and the independent commodity producer (armstrong and nelles, 1973; nelles, 1974), whose political conservatism should be noted. during the first half of this century, many provinces felt the impact of the rise of important petit bourgeois parties (macpherson, 1953; quinn, 1960; young, 1971). putting these pieces together, we can argue that the parts played by both levels of the canadian state vis-a-vis trade unions can be understood if they are situated historically in terms of the two different class interests which they in many respects reflected. the provincial state's intransigence toward international trade unions, for instance, can be seen as a response to the small-scale businessman's fears that a large and, relatively speaking, powerful international trade union could destroy his business. such fears, on the other hand, would not necessarily be felt as strongly by banking and large-scale business interests which would explain the federal government's more positive 125 alternate routes attitude towards international unions. this interpretation is in part borne out by the royal commission on industrial relations commissioned in 1919. this commission was more analytical than the former study (1889) and therefore provides a clearer insight into the problem of class conflict in canada in the early 20th century. the problem, it seems, fell on the internal divisions within canada's capitalist class. employers may be divided into three classes -(1) those who deny the right of their employees to organize (2) those who, while not denying that right of their employees to organize, refuse to recognize organization among their employees. .. .and (3) those who not only admit the right of their employees to organize, but recognize and bargain with the organization on behalf of their employees... there are not many employers in canada who belong to the first class, but there are a very large number who belong to the second class. to the third class belong the great railway , telegraph and mining companies and many building trades . . . . we believe the frank acknowledgement of this right by employers will remove one of the most serious causes of unrest (emphasis added), g class struggle in canada was primarily seen as resulting from the large number of business organizations which did not acknowledge the legitimate role of trade unions in the nation's economy. it was only the giant corporations at this point in time which were able to transcend their parochial interests and face up to the legitimacy of the collective representation of workers in canada. the statements from these royal commissions have shown the federal state's concern for labour's role within canadian capitalist society. it only remains to describe the stages in which the federal government attempted to implement these concerns. the political 'praxis' the implementation of these concerns has followed roughly two stages. as indicated in the previous section, the federal government 126 trade unions and the state endorsed labour's contribution to the development of the canadian economy. however, government only provided for registration, conciliation and arbitration on a voluntary basis. the object of the industrial disputes investigation act of june 17, 1925 is essentially the voluntary settlement of disputes before they develop into stoppages of work. the instrument employed is an ad hoc body consisting of three membe rs , one appointed on the recommendation of the other two members. the minister of labour makes any appointments necessitated by failure to recommend., the principal problem with this arrangement, as soon became obvious, was the institutional separateness between the state, industry and organized labour. only in times of crisis and only through ad hoc committees do the three parties involved come together. as long as labour was ket out of society, then the potential for violence always remained. the establishment of appropriate labour legislation would permit if not the complete incorporation of labour, at least its significant integration through its organized representatives, within the state system. the process of establishing such procedures as trade union recognition and collective bargaining by the canadian state was about to begin. this leads us to the second phase -direct state intervention between capital and labour. the first piece of legislation to help accomplish this end became the federal government's adoption of p.c. 1003 in 1943. wartime labour relations board concerning the particular contribution of p.c. 1003 effected for the incorporation of organized labour into canadian society, professor logan notes: 127 alternate routes p.c. 1003 means the bringing of the wagner act and american experience under it to canada. but it involves more: for in some respects it goes beyond, while in others it modifies the pattern. it copies the american act in setting up a special board , in strictures it directs towards employers regarding unfair labour practises, in compelling negotiations in good faith with certified representatives of their workers, in vote taking, majority rule, etc. it goes beyond it: (1) in naming and prescribing unfair practices by unions (2) it goes beyond the american act also in assuming a responsibil i ty by the state to assist the two negotiating parties to reach agreement (3) it exceeds the american act again in that it forbids strikes and lockouts during negotiations and for the term of the agreement and compels the parties to fulfil (emphasis added). ,. the important points to bear in mind are contained in the thrust of the legislation towards state intervention and the behavioural control of trade unions. significantly, this piece of labour legislation set down the basic ground rules which management, certified trade unions and the state must still follow today. the machinery implemented to bring trade unions into canadian society was the wartime labour relations board, composed of a chairman and eight representatives of employers and employees -four from each group. the board's effect on trade union activity was immediately felt. the principal cause for many strikes, union recognition, had been removed. in the words of arthur macnamara, the deputy minister of labour during the war period: ...a wartime experiment in industrial relations was to prove to have more than temporary utility, and was subsequently embodied in peacetime legislation. this was the introduction, in 1944, of compulsory collective bargaining between employers and the certified bargaining representatives of their employees. . . . its introduction had the effect of virtually ending strikes over the issue of union recognition ; a result of considerable importance during a period when unions were more than doubling their membership (emphasis added). 128 trade unions and the state certainly the increasing pressure from below which came from the doubling of trade union membership in the first few short years of the war contributed to the canadian state's positive intervention in regards to trade union recognition (jamieson, 1973: 90-91). but on matters pertaining to manpower programs and social legislation, the canadian state took a more"cautious route" by consulting with labour, management and third parties before implementing policy. again, we hear from arthur macnamara: a significant feature of the manpower program was the care that was taken to consult with labour , management and other groups on policy matters. before regulations were passed and put into effect they were reviewed by the national selective service advisory committee, made up of representatives of labour , management, the armed forces, agriculture, the universities and other groups (emphasis added) j? in matters pertaining to social legislation, a similar procedure was followed: for example, the unemployment insurance act of 1940: ...the insurance fund, financed by compulsory contributions from the employer , employed worker and the government is an excellent example of responsibility and cooperation that may exist between groups of citizens (emphasis added).,.. the importance of these consultations did not rest in the equal status of the contending parties. indeed such was not the case as labour did not have an equal voice with management. what is significant centers on the conscious action by the federal state to open the ground for future acts of incorporation. conclusion in summary, with the above changes in industrial relations the various sections of the canadian trade union movement had by 1947 14 moved significantly in the direction of incorporation. they became increasingly enmeshed in the complicated machinery of state agencies beginning, of course, on the federal level. furthermore, this trend of the canadian labour movement was facilitated by the fact that, with the 129 alternate routes short-lived exception of western syndicalists, it had always been a reform movement and never desired to seriously challenge capitalist hegemony in canada. this despite the fact that at certain historical moments, such as the massive strike waves of the post-world wars and particularly the later years of the depression, a revolu tionary leadership could have posed a substantial challenge to corporate rule in canada. however, it was only when its legitimacy within the system was not guaranteed that the trade union movement felt compelled to display a show of force. once it gained recognition and collective bargaining rights and was accepted as an integral part of canadian society the dynamics of class conflict could become more routinized. as a social institution, the unions now form not only an integral part of the commun i ty but also of the nation. the labour congresses make known the view-points of their members on national affairs through the presentation of briefs to government. in addition, representatives of unions as well as of management organizations now serve on many governmental boards and commi ttees (emphasis added). ,c by 1947, every province in canada, except saskatchewan, had, in effect, adopted p.c. 1003 as standard labour policy. variations between provinces as to its implementation were due to differences in constitutional interpretation and on the relation of class forces, that is, large versus small capital, the strength of the independent commodity producer and working class militancy. conflict continued but the implementation of p.c. 1003 virtually across canada meant that organized labour's role moved away from finhting for recognition at the national level towards consolidating these gains at the provincial level. in general, the arena within which industrial conflict would be concentrated in the post world war ii period would be in those provinces whose political machinery had the strongest support coming from local businessmen and independent farmers. 130 trade unions and the state in all, then, the role of the canadian state is a complicated picture because the two principal levels of the state, the federal and the provincial, acted in contradictory ways. the federal level was clearly in the vanguard of the political incorporation of trade unions while the provincial state apparatus had to be dragged. finally, a theory of the state and trade unions must also include an analysis of the key responses and initiatives of the working class. in dealing with process of political incorporation of trade unions in canada, we had to assume the oppositional influence of class conflict that so dramatically surfaced at such historical moments as the winnipeg general strike (1919), oshawa (1937), windsor (1945), asbestos (1949), to mention just a few examples. on the basis of the above overview, then, it appears to be too simple to see the state in capitalist societies as acting only in one direction or manner at every historical point in time. a theory of the state and trade unions must be expanded to incorporate different levels of the state apparatus and an analysis of class fractions within society which ally themselves to these different levels. in other words, the explanation for the uneven or incomplete process of incorporation of trade unions within civil society must include an analysis of the effectiveness with which the local businessmen and independent commodity producers are capable of politically implementing their ends in the face of a growing industrial working class. in our opinion, such an approach was not forthcoming from the sociological tradition but can be seen to derive from the marxist theories. 131 footnotes 1. 'secular* in terms of working class politics refers to instrumental attitudes, that is, the sober calculation of material advantages. see r.t. mackenzie and a. silver, angels in marble (london ,1969) . 2. there are of course partial exception to functionalist). for example, clark kerr has argued that "aggressive industrial conflict cannot be eliminated and can only be temporarily suppressed". he grounds his thesis on four assumptions; "labour-management conflict flows inevitably from the unsatiated desires of men, the relationship of managers and managed, the need to adapt to changed conditions in one fashion or another and the drive for institutional separateness". his mixture of hedonist philosophy and liberal pluralism does not contradict the conservative thrust of his conclusion: "but conflict may be destructive as well as constructive, and thus it needs to be guided if the social fabric is to be protected and serious injury to individuals and groups avoided" (1954: 230,231,234). 3. see the "debate with marx's ghost" in irving zeitlin, ideology and the development of sociological theory (new jersey, 1968) . 4. for further elaboration on trade union officials' powe r "over" versus "for" members, see hyman (1975) chapter three. 5. the labour gazette , september 1950, p. 1346. 6. for an alternate explanation see eric hobsbawm's "the machine breakers" in l abouring men (london, 1964). 7. c. b. williams, "development of relations between canadian and american national trade union centers 1886-1925", industrial relations (quebec ), vol. 20, no. 2, 1965. 8. there is some evidence that the same samuel gompers was quite acceptable to business interests. in a 1901 address to the national civic federation he had proclaimed "a community of interests .. between the organization of the wage earners and the organization of the employers" (cited from howard and scott in teeple, 1972: 69). 9. the labour gczette , september 1950, p. 1347. 10. international labour org anization , studies and reports, series a., no. 34, conciliation and arbitration in industrial disputes, geneva, 1933. 11. h.a. logan, "the state and collective bargaining", cjeps, 1944, vol. 10, p. 482. "(up to 1943) the canadian acts, however, provided no special machinery for enforcing their provisions, a most serious ommission." h.a. logan and m.j. inman, op. ci t . , p. 596. 12. the labour gazette, ibid . , pp. 1342, 1344, 1345. 13. ibid . , p. 1369. 14. while we have emphasized the legislative aspect of industrial relations in this sketch, a more thorough investigation would also note the role of state coercion i.e., use of the police and judiciary. 15. the labour gazette , op. cit., p. 1372. 16. see i. abel la (ed.) on s trike: six key labour struggles in canada 1919-1949 (toronto, 1974). 132 abel la, irving 1974 on strike: six key labor struggles in canada 1919-1949 . toronto: james lewis 5 samuel. armstrong, c. and h.v. nelles 1973 "private property in peril: ontario businessmen and the federal system, 1898-1911" in g. porter and r. cliff (eds) enterprise and national development . toronto: hakkert. bendix, r. 19s6 work and authority in industry . new york: harper 5 row. crispo, john 1967 international unionism: a study in canadian-american relations . toronto: mcgraw-hill. dunlop, j.t. 1958 industrial relations systems . new york: holt. hobsbawm, eric 1964 labouring men: studies in the history of labour . london: weidenfeld and nicolson. howard, roger and jack scott 1972 "international unions and the ideology of class collaboration" in g. teeple (ed.) capitalism and the national question in canada. toronto: u. of t. press. hyman, richard 1971 marxism and the sociology of trade unionism . london: pluto. 1975 industrial relations . london: macmillan. international labour organization 1933 conciliation and arbitration in industrial disputes . studies and reports, series a., no. 34, geneva. ingham, g. 1974 strikes and industrial conflict . london: macmillan. jamieson, stuart 1973 industrial relations in canada . toronto: macmillan. kerr, clark 1954 "industrial conflict and its mediation", american journal of sociology , vol. 60, pp. 230-245. labour , dept . of 1950 labour gazette . ottawa. lenin, v.i. 1967 "what is to be done?", selected works, volume i . moscow: progress . logan, h.a. 1944 "the state and collective bargaining", canadi an journal of economics and political science , vol. 10, pp. 476-488. mackenzie, r.t. and a. silver 1969 • angels in marble . london. 133 macpherson, c.b. 1953 mann, michael 1973 naylor, tom 1975 nelles, h.v. 1974 trotsky, leon 1975 ware, n.j. 1937 weinstein, james 1968 williams, c.b. 1965 young, walter 1969 zeitlin, irving 1968 democracy in alberta: social credit and the party system . toronto: university of toronto press. consciousness and action among the western working class. london: macmillan. the history of canadian business 1867-1914 . toronto: james lorimer. the politics of development . toronto: macmillan. leon trotsky on the trade unions . new york: pathfinder. "the history of labour interactions", in n.j. ware and h.a. logan, labour in canadian-american relations . toronto: ryerson. corporate ideal in the liberal state, 1900-1918 . boston: beacon. "development of relations between canadian and american national trade union centers 1886-1925" in i ndustrial relations (quebec) , vol. 20, no. 2. anatomy of a party . toronto: university of toronto press. ideology and the development of sociological theory. new jersey: prentice-hall. 134 crisis and opportunism | 33 crisis and opportunism: public finance trends from stimulus to austerity in canada — christopher stoney and tamara krawchenko1 with crisis comes uncertainly and with it, opportunity. this has certainly characterized responses to the 2007 economic crises and its aftermath. in the early days of the crisis, economists and the neoclassical model alike were battered with contempt from internal and external criticism (nadeau, 2008). even the staunchly neoliberal magazine, the economist, briefly declared the death of neoclassical economics—only to rectify and defend it in its subsequent issue. leading up to the 2007 economic crisis, there had been a movement within economics to question market fundamentalist logic and the increasingly divorced-fromreality mathematical models that had come to define the profession (williams & mcneill, 2005, p.3). neoclassical economics and its bedfellow, neoliberalism, has dominated public policy for so long that its widespread critique since the most recent economic crisis has led to speculation that we are witnessing a paradigm shift. our review of canadian federal public policy and expenditures finds that there has been no such significant or sustained shift and the economic crisis and resulting federal stimulus expenditures have done little to reorient the dominance of neoliberal policy in canada. indeed by 2012 talk of a paradigm shift or significant realignment in the neoliberal consensus had largely evaporated. 1 christopher stoney is associate professor in the school of public policy and administration, director of the centre for urban research and education at carleton university, and co-editor of how ottawa spends. his research interests include infrastructure funding, municipal government and urban sustainability. tamara krawchenko is assistant professor in political science at dalhousie university. her current research focuses on rural community and economic development in the atlantic provinces. 34 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism using powerful imagery, harvie and milburn (2011) epitomize the sense of despair felt by many towards neoliberalism’s seemingly inexorable march: “neoliberalism no longer “makes sense”, but its logic keeps stumbling on, without conscious direction, like a zombie: ugly, persistent and dangerous. such is the “unlife” of a zombie, a body stripped of its goals, unable to adjust itself to the future, unable to make plans. it can only act habitually as it pursues a monomaniacal hunger” (harvie and milburn, 2011). in order to illuminate aspects of the return to ‘business as usual,’ the paper focuses on telling the story of stimulus and austerity in canada by examining federal government expenditures from 2006 onwards using public accounts data (fiscal years 2005-2011). we highlight how the crisis (and the way it was presented) provided opportunities for the harper government to deliver strategic shifts in priorities and spending. in particular, we focus in on the two biggest ministerial portfolio ‘winners’ over this period –the ministries of transport (namely, the department of infrastructure canada) and natural resources. rather than initiating a change in thinking amongst the policy elites we see a continuation, if not a heightening of existing ‘growth-first’ priorities. for canada, this has included a focus on supporting a natural resource driven export economy in support of a political commitment to economic expansion, wealth creation and employment. canada’s stimulus response to the economic crisis can be seen to have been consistent with the harper government’s overall approach of “open federalism,” the two major tenets of which are: smaller government (“keeping the federal government’s spending power within bounds”) and adherence to the constitutional divisions of powers (“respecting areas of provincial jurisdiction” (pm of canada, 2006). significantly, compared to many other countries, the size of canada’s stimulus measures were relatively small (ccpa, 2009, p.2) and much of it focused on tax cuts and some infrastructure spending in which funding contributions from other levels of government were required. harmes argues that ‘open federalism’ is consistent with a “broader neoliberal approach to federalism which, among other aims, seeks to use institutional reforms to lock in more market-oriented public policies” (2007, p.418). of interest in the areas of natural resources and trade is how public policy has promoted an energy-based export agenda—a continuation and yet, new manifestation of harold innis’ staples theory crisis and opportunism | 35 of canadian development (innis, 1956). here, open federalism’s tenets are somewhat relaxed, as the federal government takes a strong interest in resource extraction and the development of infrastructure to support canada’s export markets – areas of major government expenditure and intervention in provincial affairs. in this area the prime minister has been eager to exploit opportunities to sell canada’s oil, gas and other natural resources abroad with particular attention focused on the giant us and emerging chinese markets. consequently, despite a commitment to smaller government and respect for provincial jurisdiction, the federal government finds itself involved in major interventions that favor some regions over others and appears to contradict the basic principles of open federalism. given the political and calculated nature of these interventions we contend that ‘strategic federalism’ provides a better description of the government’s approach than ‘open federalism’. because our focus is on federal spending in canada, we engage mainly with the literature seeking to dissect how neoliberal policies are adopted across time and place. this includes the literature on ‘varieties of neoliberalism’ (cerny, 2004) and that which seeks to understand the distinctive ways in which it is practiced at different scales (e.g., varro, 2010; mackinnon & shaw, 2010). however we are also influenced by ongoing debates concerning broader manifestations of neoliberalism and the impact of particular types of state intervention. in this wider context the paper’s conception of neoliberalization draws on the so-called neoliberal commandments (harvey, 2003) predicated on the washington consensus (williamson, 1990). in particular we emphasize the focus these approaches place on fiscal and monetary austerity, the lowering of inflation rates, trade and financial liberalization, deregulation, and reorientation of public expenditure, the freeing of interest rates, and emergence of independent central banks. we also share harvey’s view that neo-liberalism must be understood as a comprehensive theory of political as well as economic practices as this firmly acknowledges that the state has a key and selective role to play in advancing the neo-liberal project including the creation of “free markets” and “free trade”. (harvey, 2003) state interventions into the economy during the neoliberal era have shifted drastically from protecting individuals from the perils of the market and limiting corporate power during the keynesian era to subsidizing corporations, promoting competitiveness of national economies, and undermining the power of labor (ruckert, 2006). significant in this shift has been the growing power of increasingly global capital, in contrast to largely immobile labour (ruckert, 2009). this has been facilitated 36 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism and reflected by the ‘internationalization of the state’ whereby nation states increasingly prioritize the interests of transnational (financial) capital over domestic (industrial) capital and social groupings (ruckert, 2010; baker, 1999). this has helped fashion the deregulation of financial markets and the opening up of national economies to international competition. importantly ruckert (2010) connects this process to institutional changes, in particular the growing influence of the state agencies that are linked to (and often directly represent) the interests of transnational capital, such as ministries of finance and central banks. the ascendency of financial institutions and the deregulation that has accompanied it has been highly significant in the emergence of neoliberalism and the resulting crisis. as harvie and milburn (2011) argue, while the postwar keynesian settlement contained an explicit deal linking rising real wages to rising productivity, neoliberalism contained an implicit deal based on access to cheap credit. while real wages have stagnated since the late 1970s, the mechanisms of debt have maintained most people’s living standards. the financial crisis shattered the central component of this deal by restricting access to cheap credit and undermining confidence in financial markets and continued growth. faced with a severe financial crisis, governments initially intervened to stimulate spending, subsidize corporations and shore up markets leading to suggestions of a return to keynesian style government and the demise of neoliberal hegemony. however, the hasty return to austerity measures combined with attacks on public services and the public servants that provide them have reaffirmed that any shift in policy will be short-lived and should not be conflated with paradigmatic or fundamental reforms. our analysis of spending trends combined with the government’s stated priorities suggests that canadians face an intensification of neoliberal policies rather than a shift or decline. as such we are likely to see continued and growing inequality within canadian society on a scale greater than before the crisis. warning of the dangers of growing inequality, stiglitz (2012) identifies this trend in the us, with america’s current level of income inequality at historic levels not seen before the great depression. in the boom years before the financial crisis in 2008, the top 1 percent seized more than 65 percent of the gain in national income. in 2010, as the us struggled to emerge from a deep recession, the 1 percent gained 93 percent of the additional income created in the so-called recovery (stiglitz, 2012). with respect to neoliberalism, stiglitz points out that inequality does not arise in a vacuum but from the interplay of market forces and political crisis and opportunism | 37 machinations. over time, he argues, politics has shaped the market in ways that advantage those at the top at the expense of the rest of society. with an economic system that seems to fail most citizens and a political system that appears captive to moneyed interests, he warns of the price of growing inequality in terms of slower growth, lower gdp, greater instability and a variety of social and democratic threats. it is in this context that we examine the policy response of the harper government following the financial crisis and consider the implications for canada the paper is organized into four parts. first, we examine the ‘big picture’ of federal revenue and expenses in canada over the last decade with a focus on stimulus and austerity measures. second, we turn to the ministries of trade and natural resources—two of the biggest ‘winners’ in revenue terms over recent years. we examine just how these ministries have expanded and consider the meaning of this within the broader context of fiscal federalism and the economy. from this high level analysis of public accounts we consider the federal government’s policy priorities and policy focus. third, we reflect on the most recent budget (2012) and what this means for the direction of change. the final section offers conclusions. from stimulus to austerity the onset of the global economic crisis led to a common refrain amongst commentators that “we are all keynesians now”. interestingly, governments that were ideologically opposed to such spending would now need to adopt stimulus policies in order to strengthen investment, consumer and business confidence (and capital liquidity). canada’s response was launched through its 2007 economic statement. the stimulus budget proposed $60 billion in broad-based tax relief over five years. this was followed by a two-year commitment to financial stimulus measures focused on taxation, employment insurance benefits, and infrastructure investments, as outlined in the 2009-10 budget, entitled canada’s economic action plan. similar to other countries, the stimulus measures adopted through canada’s 2009-2010 budget focused on encouraging economic growth. that budget stated stimulus measures were guided by three principles—that they be “timely, targeted and temporary” (government of canada 2009, p.4). the budget further stated that measures would begin within 120 days of the budget being passed; that the measures would focus on targeting businesses and families in the greatest need in order to trigger increases in jobs and output and; finally, that the plan would be phased out 38 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism “when the economy recovers [in order] to avoid long-term structural deficits” (ibid). while some aspects of the plan would be phased out (i.e., infrastructure spending) the stimulus measures clearly stated that one objective would be to “reduce taxes permanently” (department of finance, 2010). we can see in chart 1 below the recession reflected in the government’s public accounts. program expenses increased as a percent of gdp while revenues decreased. it is important to note that part of this revenue decline comes from the decision to reduce taxation in a number of areas. for example the decision to drop two percentage points off of the goods and services tax(gst) and to reduce the corporate tax rate. this figure is further compounded by a contraction of economic growth over these years. while federal government revenues as a percentage of gdp have steadily decreased over the past decade (from 18.1 per cent in 2000-01 to 14.6 per cent in 2010-11), program expenses as a percentage of gdp saw increases in the 2009-10 and 2010-11 periods (at 16.0 and 14.7 per cent respectively). this is a slight increase from the previous three years where program expenditures as a percentage of gdp were steady at 13 per cent. in the past two years there has been an operating deficit (2009-10 and 2010-11) and over the past three year period there has been a budgetary deficit (between 2008-09 and 2010-11). the increasing size of the deficit (both budgetary and operational) has been instrumental in the narrative of austerity. chart 1. public accounts, fiscal transactions, per cent of gdp, 2000-2011 the government posted a budgetary deficit of $55.6 billion for the fiscal year ending march 31, 2010 (department of finance, 2010). finance minister flaherty blamed the 2010 fiscal year record deficit on the $5.6 billion payout to british columbia and ontario to assist with the transition to the harmonized sales tax, and the decision to limit increases in employcrisis and opportunism | 39 ment insurance premiums (ibid.). while these obviously contributed to the overall size of the deficit, they are only part of the fiscal equation with the government also responsible for cuts in direct and indirect taxation over this period in addition to its spending on stimulus measures. clearly the policy preference for tax cuts has helped to diminish government revenues and in doing so has also contributed to the narrative of ‘belt tightening’ for the public sector. having helped manufacture a sizeable deficit, minister flaherty has made it the deficit into as a major public issue and used it to justify austerity measures, warning canadians to brace themselves against significant cutbacks in budget 2012 (ibid.). the chart below illustrates these trends. personal income tax, expressed as a percentage of gdp, has consistently declined over that past decade, with the exception of the 2010-11 period, when there was a slight increase (from 6.8 percent to 7.0 per cent of gdp). total tax revenue as a percentage of gdp has declined and flattened, hitting an all time low over the past three years. corporate income tax as a percentage of gdp has been lower in the past three years than in the previous five. overall, revenues as a percentage of gdp show a declining trend over the past decade. economically, this shift is consistent with the political shift to ‘open federalism’s’ commitment to smaller government. chart 2. public accounts, government of canada revenue by type, percent of gdp, 2000-2011 a high level analysis of public accounts from the past decade shows evidence of ‘roll-back neoliberalism’ (peck and tickell, 2002). government revenues have slowly declined and the public sector is urged to do less with less. the conservative government has expressed a commitment to leave as much as possible to the private sector. the economic crisis has brought with it opportunism – it has led to a wide swath of 40 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism tax cuts (some of them, permanent) and has reoriented spending in a number of areas. the size of the deficit is however part of a fiscal choice to reduce taxation. while the conservative government expresses preference for smaller government and limited spending, there are inconsistencies in the expression of these preferences across portfolios—some ministries and departments have grown considerably, while others have diminished in revenue and policy importance. while we have seen evidence of ‘roll-back neo-liberalism’ there is also evidence of ‘roll-out neoliberalism’ as certain ministries become the focus of government policies and spending. the chart below provides an analysis of the changes in public accounts since 2006. it shows the percentage change of total net expenditures by ministry between the years 2006 and 2001 (in constant 2002 dollars). the red line denotes the average percentage change for all – a 14.30 percentage increase. those ministries above the red line gained more than the average in revenue terms over those years, and those below it lost more than the average. hence, this gives some indications of relative spending priorities. by this analysis, the ministries of transport and natural resources have seen the greatest percentage increases. this percentage change figure should be read with caution in the case of some ministries – the privy council, the governor general, parliament, finance and justice can see major fluctuations in funding for a variety of reasons. for example, parliament and the governor general may have large capital expenditure due to renovations. the privy council (pco) may have special royal commission expenditures (or see fluctuations because it includes the office of the chief electoral officer), and finance can have highly fluctuating transfer payments. from this overall analysis, two federal priorities clearly emerge – infrastructure and natural resources. crisis and opportunism | 41 chart 3. public accounts, percentage change total net ministerial expenditure, 2006-2011, constant dollars federal priorities: infrastructure and natural resources transport and infrastructure the ministry of transport has grown in importance over the years, with numerous agencies and authorities being added to it.2 the chart below shows the total budget by authority within the transport ministry for the fiscal years 2006-2011 (in millions, 2002 constant dollars). it is clear from this analysis why the revenues of the ministry have increased 2 in 2004, the ministry was composed of transport canada, the canadian transportation agency (a regulatory agency) and the transportation appeal tribunal of canada. in 2005, this portfolio was expanded to include the office of infrastructure of canada, the national capital commission, the canada post corporation and the royal canadian mint two years later, it would include the canadian air transport security authority, the federal bridge corporation limited, the jacques cartier and champlain bridges incorporated, via rail canada inc., marine atlantic inc. and old port of montreal corporation inc. the old port of montreal corporation existed under this portfolio from 2006-2009. 42 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism so considerably in the past several years – infrastructure canada has seen massive budgetary increases over this period. the remainder of this section will focus on the gains of this department. chart 4. transport ministry—total budget of authorities used by fiscal year, millions of dollars, 2002 constant dollars stimulus responses in the wake of the late 2007 financial crisis focused on short-term growth (raising aggregate demand) as well as long-term growth by aiming to create favorable conditions for investment and innovation. these measures entailed both revenue side policies (cuts to direct and indirect taxes and social insurance contributions) and spending side policies of which there are many possibilities. one of the most popular choices made by governments on the spending side has been the ramping up of public investment in infrastructure. the infrastructure components of the stimulus measures in canada were approximately $40 billion (cad) over two years.3 the largest portions of the infrastructure measures were tax credits for households – e.g., home renovation and energy efficiency tax credits administered through the canada revenue agency.4 these tax incentives to households accounted for approximately 28 per cent of all 3 this figure is the sum of total reported stimulus measures for 2009 and 2010. this figure does not include funds leveraged by other orders of government e.g., through the creation of stimulus programs requiring matching grants, which, in the canadian case are a significant amount (department of finance canada, 2009). 4 knowledge infrastructure has been excluded (department of finance canada, 2009). crisis and opportunism | 43 infrastructure related stimulus spending.5 the second largest proportion was allocated to social housing, first nations housing and northern housing at approximately 15.4 per cent of total infrastructure related funding and administered through the canada mortgage and housing corporation (cmhc) and indian and northern affairs (inac) in some cases.6 the third largest component of funding was allocated to a mixture of provincial, municipal and first nations, territorial and some federal infrastructure—amounting to approximately nine per cent of total infrastructure related investments.7 many of the infrastructure investments that were chosen were often less complicated projects such as road expansion as opposed to more transformative projects such as transit for which the employment effects of stimulus spending are greater (ccpa, 2009, p.2). in many oecd countries, the infrastructure components of stimulus programs included transformative long-term projects (oecd, 2011). the chart below details spending by major program area for infrastructure canada between the years 2008-2011 (in 2002 constant dollars).8 funding programs have significantly expanded in infrastructure from but two major program areas in the 2008-09 fiscal year to 14 in the 2010-11 fiscal year. some of this is one time funding, such as support for the g20 and g8 summits. however, much of it represents a major program of investment into large infrastructure projects, particularly in areas that support trade such as the asia pacific gateways and corridors initiative; the ontario-quebec continental gateway and trade corridor and; the atlantic gateway and trade corridor. these initiatives involve major partnerships between the federal and provincial and municipal governments to connect canada to eastern, western and southern markets with significant funding attached to the development of border crossings, ports, airports, railway lines and major highways across the region. 5 calculation includes funding for the programs home renovation tax credit; enhancing the energy efficiency of our homes; increasing withdrawal limits under the home buyers’ plan and; first-time home buyers’ tax credit as a proportion of all infrastructure-related funding measures. this figure excludes knowledge infrastructure. 6 ibid. 7 ibid. 8 fields noted ‘not applicable’ (n/a) indicate funding has been discontinued. 44 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism chart 5. office of infrastructure canada – expenditure components by program type, millions of dollars, 2002 constant dollars. the role of the federal government in municipal affairs has gone through waves of engagement and disengagement over the past decades. the harper government is publicly committed to the principles of ‘open federalism’ and seeks to adhere to the constitutional division of powers wherein municipalities are ‘creatures’ of the provinces. however, their strong role in infrastructure development and a particular orientation to trade is a major area of federal involvement—one that sets a strong direction for urban policy in canada’s biggest city regions. in this role, the federal government is a leader, committing vast sums of money to build partnerships that will reorient our urban regions around a trade agenda. crisis and opportunism | 45 natural resources unlike the ministry of transport, the ministry of natural resources has been a relatively stable portfolio.9 the chart below shows the total budget by authority within the natural resources ministry for the fiscal years 2006-2011 (in millions, 2002 constant dollars). as was seen in the case of infrastructure canada, the department of natural resources leads in gains. chart 6. ministry of natural resources, total budget of authorities used by fiscal year, millions of dollars, 2002 constant dollars. the department of natural resources seeks to enhance the use and competitiveness of canada’s natural resources products. the department conducts scientific research and technology development in the fields of energy, forests, mineral and metals and earth sciences. as a lead department in the natural resources development they are involved in environmental assessments and their work must comply with the cana9 it is composed of the department of natural resources, atomic energy of canada limited, the northern pipeline agency, the canadian nuclear safety commission, the national energy board and cape breton development corporation. the cape breton development corporation was disbanded in 2009. 46 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism dian environmental assessment act and the cabinet directive on the environmental assessment of policy plan and program proposals. chart 7 (below) shows expenditure components by program type for the department of natural resources (millions of dollars, 2002 constant dollars). one can see that over the past few years, the department has focused its attentions on adaptation management (including hazard risk management and climate adaptation). some of these functions had previously been undertaken by environment canada and one can make the argument that environmental protection might be better placed there rather than a department whose mandate is resource development. chart 7. department of natural resources – expenditure components by program type, millions of dollars, 2002 constant dollars. the prime minister’s efforts to promote canadian exports abroad and natural resources in particular, has been a key feature of canada’s recent trade and foreign policy. strong lobbying for the keystone xl pipeline and the recent visits to china, malaysia and japan were aimed at increasing trade surpluses with these countries and underline the govcrisis and opportunism | 47 ernment’s strategy to use economic growth as means of paying down the deficit in time for the next election. in a 2006 speech, mr. harper set out his vision of canada as a “global energy superpower power” and was reportedly furious with president obama’s 2011 announcement to delay the keystone xl pipeline for at least a year. soon after, harper had established energy exports as the government’s new top strategic priority, with asia seen as the key market to target, making enbridge’ northern gateway pipeline to the seaport at kitimat bc an essential project (wells and mcmahon, 2012). this context helps explain why environmental assessments have recently been streamlined and also the alacrity with which prime minister harper appears to have backtracked in relation to china’s record on human rights. as corcoran observes “his [mr. harper’s] previous issues with china appear to have been sidelined, replaced in part by some neonixonian strategizing over potential economic advantage over the united states” (corcoran, 2012). heading to china, mr. harper set out his intentions and his hopes very clearly: “[a]s you know, our country is looking for new markets for our goods and services and china and the entire asiapacific region is an area of tremendous opportunity,” and added, “[w]e hope to expand on our strategic partnership with china and, in particular, we hope to deepen the economic and trade ties between our two countries” (corcoran, 2012). this represents a significant shift in policy by the government and it remains to be seen how the us will react and how deeper trade ties with china and asia will develop. opportunism amidst crisis: the narrative of austerity and the 2012 federal budget having examined federal expenditures over the past several years, we turn here to the most recent federal budget to examine some of its implications for policy development in the near term. for several reasons, the 2012 budget can be seen as a watershed moment in a politically realigned canada and speculation was intense leading up to its release. the conservatives having secured a much sought after majority were finally in a position to define their political agenda without having to depend on the mercurial support of the opposition parties. political opponents feared that the way was now clear for the conservatives to push ahead with the implementation of the so-called harper agenda, particularly in view of the fact that both the ndp and liberal parties had spent most of 2011-12 in limbo as they attempted to (re)establish long-term leadership and political direction. that said an uncertain 48 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism and fragile fiscal and economic climate, a weak majority and a series of political scandals including the so-called “in and out” scandal, misuse of the g8/g20 border infrastructure fund and the “robocall” election fraud made this a challenging environment within which to introduce an austerity budget. in particular it required the government to tread carefully as it balanced cuts in public spending with the fragile economic recovery and the political fallout that typically accompanies cuts in core services and benefits such as pensions and old age security spending. when the conservatives came to power in 2006 they inherited a budget surplus of $8-billion. in 2008, the government entered into a deficit due to falling tax revenue and higher spending. in its november 2011 economic update, the government projected canada’s deficit for 2011-2012 would be $31-billion, although recent indicators suggest it could be lower. in 2010-2011, canada’s actual deficit was $33.4-billion. whether or not the 2012 budget is seen as draconian response to this size of deficit, the government’s majority allied to its commitment to slay the deficit created an opportunity to prioritize its spending and program commitments in a way that was not conceivable in previous years. as during the election campaign, mr. flaherty and the prime minister said repeatedly that jobs and economic growth are their first priority. not surprisingly therefore, the first harper majority government budget on march 29th was titled and pitched as a jobs, growth and long-term prosperity budget, with links back to the economic action plan from their minority government years. stressing that canada has done relatively well in the global recession context and in job creation since 2009, finance minister jim flaherty emphasized instead the structural problems that canada must now address both for long-term prosperity and “to ensure the sustainability of public finances and social programs for future generations” the structural fundamentalism of the budget, that is, its greater focus on steps needed to ensure the full potential of the economy is intended to be the main message.10 the harper list of policies and initiatives (spending, tax and regulatory in nature) in their order of presentation include: • supporting entrepreneurs, innovators and worldclass research • responsible resource development • expanding trade and opening new markets for canadian business 10 on structural fundamentalism, see doern et al, 2013, chapter 3. crisis and opportunism | 49 • investing in training, infrastructure and opportunity • expanding opportunities for aboriginal peoples to fully participate in the economy • building a fast and flexible economic immigration system • sustainable social programs and secure retirement • responsible expenditure management11 the budget cuts of $5.2 billion, mainly referred to in the final “responsible expenditure management” section are not highlighted although considerable attention is drawn in the budget to the elimination of 19,200 civil service jobs. among the agencies mentioned in the budget to be eliminated outright are assisted human reproduction canada (beset with constitutional and court challenges) and the national roundtable on the environment and the economy (an advisory body not favoured by the conservatives, in part because of its climate change policy advocacy). further budget cuts are planned to reach about $5 billion a year by 2014-2015 (see further discussion below of cuts and the strategic review process headed by treasury board president, tony clement). under the above structural themes other key particular initiatives were announced in budget 2012). among these are: • increase funding for research and development by small and medium-sized companies, including through a refocusing of the role of the national research council. • in the resource development sphere, bring forward legislation to achieve the goal of “one project, one review” in a clearly defined period. • pursue new and deeper trading relationships, particularly with large, dynamic and fast-growing economies. • invest in first nations education on reserve, including early literacy programming and other supports and services to first nations schools and students. • move to an increasingly fast and flexible immigration system where priority focus is on meeting canada’s labour market needs. • gradually increase the age of eligibility for old age security (oas) and guaranteed income supplement benefits from 65 to 67. 11 government of canada, 2012, p.5-11. 50 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism this change will start in april 2023 with full implementation by january 2029, and will not affect anyone who is 54 years of age or older as of march 31st, 2012.12 as these priorities and initiatives demonstrate, the government’s response to the fiscal crisis has been influenced by the neoliberal framework and “commandments” outlined in the introduction. just as the financial crisis in canada was at least in part manufactured by domestic fiscal policy, the urgency with which the deficit is being tackled is just as much a question of politics as it is economics. in a political context it is important that the deficit is reduced quickly and, specifically, in time for the next federal election. having already committed to return to a surplus position by then the question for the conservatives appears to be how not whether to implement cuts. to this end much emphasis has been placed on strategic review. in canada, “program reviews” that check all government spending have been a feature of public sector managing since the late 1970s. at that time these reviews were infrequent and usually responded to political promises that spending would be kept to a minimum. it was not until the late 1990s that such reviews became a routine feature of canadian public management, culminating in “strategic reviews” introduced in 2006, and now “operational reviews” (not the same thing) introduced in 2011. these latter reviews are intended to find significant one-time cuts in services, rather than ongoing and permanent cuts as in the case of the former. “strategic reviews” were introduced to force departments and agencies to find critical savings and to use these savings to align with key government priorities. such reviews are conducted every four years with the objective of finding five percent savings from low performing, low priority programs and services. the goal of the latest strategic and operating review is to find ongoing savings of at least $4-billion a year by 2014-2015 from departments’ total $80-billion operating budget. this represents only one part of total federal spending and includes the cost of staff and benefits etc. the rest of the spending, including $150-billion in program spending and transfers, are not part of the spending review. consequently out of a total spending of almost $250-billion, including about $30-billion in interest on the federal debt, the government aims to cut spending by 1.5%. more than 60 departments have submitted plans to cabinet for either five to 10 per cent cuts to their budgets, by finding operating efficiencies and examining the usefulness of programs. 12 government of canada, 2012, p.5-11. crisis and opportunism | 51 the stated desire to avoid cuts in services is attractive to governments because it reduces the political fall-out with the electorate and provides the opposition and critics with less ammunition. the government’s strategy is to present cuts as targeting inefficiency, red tape and redundant “back room” bureaucrats rather than services and benefits. in order to further reduce the political pain some commentators have suggested that mr. flaherty is also conducting a “strategy by stealth” approach to realizing cuts and deficit reduction (reynolds, 2011). this view is predicated on two main patterns of action that have helped minister flaherty achieve “real dollar, per-capita austerity” over the each of the last 5 years without the kinds of protests and political fallout seen in other countries in response to austerity measures. first, reynolds points to program spending increases that are less than the amount needed to keep pace with population-plus inflation adjustments. a budget prepared in this way will show nominal increases in national expenditure every year (averaging 2 per cent a year) even though they are, de-facto, cuts. second, he points to minister flaherty’s attempts to look for and weed out government programs that are no longer seen to serve a productive purpose. by making small, incremental spending cuts, “here and there, hither and yon”, he contends that minister. flaherty has provided the world with a good example of “responsible restraint – without inciting mobs” (reynolds, 2011). because these kinds of cuts are difficult to notice, he describes the process as “austerity on the quiet” (reynolds, 2011). clearly this approach is politically attractive as it avoids minus signs on the fiscal ledger, and it is harder for the opposition to galvanize resistance around specific or draconian cuts. reynolds concludes it is an effective strategy that has managed to realize $10billion of savings in recent years. in spite of the political attractiveness of stealth as a means of achieving reductions many fiscal conservatives would like to see more severe cuts, particularly in areas that have become political and ideological targets or simply to signal government priorities. not surprisingly in this context, further job cuts are predicted for environment canada, in addition to the 776 already announced in 2011-12. consistent with a neoliberal agenda, environmental assessments have been seen to slow down projects and the exploitation of natural resources across canada, and in its northern regions in particular, and the government is keen to suspend these for projects pending, labeling them as excessive red tape and impediments to economic growth and jobs. specific programs and green energy initiatives were also being pinpointed for cuts and/or eradication. the target of these proposed cuts are clearly green and renewable energy programs 52 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism which, since the expansion of the alberta tar sands, have increasingly come to symbolize the deepening ideological divide between canada’s left and right on energy and environmental policy as well as the splits between the provinces. while ontario and other provinces have begun to seriously invest in renewable energy programs, alberta and saskatchewan look to the federal government for policies that facilitate greater exploitation of oil and gas as well as other natural resources. given the harper conservative’s commitment to jobs, growth, increased trade and their western political base, it is no surprise that spending on the environment and in renewable energies continues to be vulnerable. consequently the government has sought to minimize climate change as an issue, withdrawn from kyoto and effectively given up the pretence of taking serious action to reduce emissions. however, it is not just the substance of the 2012 budget that has caused concern; critics also point to the lack of transparency and informed debate that has been a constant feature of the process. bill c-38, also called the jobs, growth and long-term prosperity act, tabled the 2012 budget as part of a so-called omnibus bill. over 420 pages long, it has been described as a “statutory juggernaut” that introduces, amends, or repeals nearly 70 federal laws. it has been presented to the house of commons in a manner that may be without close precedent in canadian parliamentary history and has made proper parliamentary scrutiny impossible in the time available (galvin, 2012). the parliamentary budget officer has also been concerned by the lack of reporting to parliament on the impact of the cuts announced in the 2012 budget as well as the previous two and is fighting to have details released by the government. liberal mp john mccallum said this “slow oozing” of information over months erodes transparency and accountability and silences any debate at committees on what programs and services canadians may be losing (may, 2012). he also expected this delay and “lack of transparency” since treasury board recently ordered departments not to include details about the reductions in their annual planning and priorities reports to parliament (may 2012). conclusion the policy practices of the harper government over the past few years have transformed much of what the state does and how it does it. the narrative of austerity has been formative in the ability of the government to push through these transformative changes. in particular, the economic crisis and canada’s growing reliance on oil and crisis and opportunism | 53 gas for its economic wellbeing has allowed the government to shift policy direction in ways that might have seemed impossible when they came to power. as this paper has shown, the crisis of austerity is at least in part a manufactured one—based on the decision to reduce taxation in a number of areas. this narrative of ‘crisis’ has been instrumental in reducing government involvement in a range of activities and in plans to decrease the size of the public service significantly. numerous women’s groups have lost their funding; the roundtable for the environment and the economy has been disbanded; as has the canadian council on learning.13 these are but a small sample of groups and policy issues affected. at the same time, regulatory and oversight mechanisms are being eroded in such areas as trade and environmental assessments (woods, 2012). while the government is divesting its involvement in many areas, it is increasing them in others—as we have shown through the departments of infrastructure and natural resources. consequently, we argue that ‘open federalism’ is a serious misnomer and that ‘strategic federalism’ better describes the selective nature of the federal role under the harper government. our analysis of public accounts has sought to take a look at overall spending patterns and focus on two examples, but the data holds many stories of interest. rather than abandoning the neoliberal project, we believe that recent budgets, policies and priorities suggest that a more intense and comprehensive neoliberal agenda is emerging in canada. dissecting these changes and what they mean for the longer term will be a major task in the coming years. the well-documented restriction of information and control of communications complicates this task (office of the information commissioner of canada, 2010; the professional institute of the public service of canada, 2011; maher, 2011). but, such work will be pivotal in understanding how neoliberal policies, in the case of this government, are being practiced. we hope to have contributed in some small way to this dialogue. 13 as of april 25, 2011, thirty-five women’s organizations in canada have had federal funding significantly cut or ended all together (ad hoc coalition for women’s equality and human rights 2011). 54 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism references ad hoc coalition for women’s equality and human rights (2011). http:// www.womensequality.ca/ bagnall, j. (2011, june 10). afraid of 2012? remember the budget of 1995. the ottawa citizen. http://www.fcpp.org/publication.php/3797 baker, a. (1999). nebuleuse and the ‘internationalization of the state’ in the uk? the case of hm treasury and the bank of england. review of international political economy, 6(1), 79-100 bruno, j. (2012, february 27). the majority governing conservatives are having a difficult time deciding what to cut, what to keep, and where to reallocate the scarce funds. the hill times. http://www.hilltimes.com/ news/news/2012/02/27/expect-a%e2%80%98watershed%e2%80%99federal-budget-say-experts/29723 ccpa (2009). 2009 budget analysis. ottawa: canadian centre for policy alternative. cerny, p. g. (2004). mapping varieties of neoliberalism. paper prepared for presentation at the annual convention of the international studies association, montreal, québec, 17-20 march 2004 and the annual conference of the political studies association of the united kingdom, 6-8 april 2004. http://www.psa.ac.uk/cps/2004/cerny.pdf coen, d. & roberts, a. (2012). a new age of uncertainty. governance: an international journal of policy, administration, and institutions, 25(1) 5-9. corcoran, t. (2012, february 10). panda politics: it’s trickier than you think. national post. http://opinion.financialpost.com/2012/02/10/pandapolitics-its-trickier-thanyou-think/ de souza, m. (2012, april 6). quebec tories say stephen harper creating ‘winning conditions’ for referendum. postmedia news. http://lifestyle. topnewstoday.org/culture/article/1969375/ department of finance (2010). annual financial report of the government of canada fiscal year 2009–2010. http://www.fin.gc.ca/afr-rfa/2010/ report-rapport-eng.asp department of finance canada. (2007). strong leadership, a better canada: economic statement. ottawa: government of canada, october 30, 2007. department of finance canada. (2009). budget 2009: canada’s economic action plan backgrounder. ottawa: government of canada. http://www. fin.gc.ca/n08/09-011eng.asp doern, g.b., a.m. maslove and m.j. prince. (2013). canadian public budgeting in the age of crises. ottawa and kingston: mcgill-queens press. easterbrook, w.t. & watkins, m.h. (1984) the staple approach. in w.t easterbrook & m.h. watkins (eds.), approaches to canadian economic history (pp. 1–98). ottawa: carleton university press. crisis and opportunism | 55 evans, b. & albo, g. (2011). permanent austerity: the politics of the canadian exit strategy from fiscal stimulus. alternate routes: a journal of critical social research, 22, 7-28. fanelli, c. & hurl, c. (2011). janus-faced austerity: strengthening the ‘competitive’ canadian state. alternate routes: a journal of critical social research, 22, 29-50. fekete, f. (2012b, march 16) future of public service in hands of nine parliamentarians. postmedia news. retrieved september 30, 2012, from http://www2.canada.com/future+public+service+hands+nine+parliame ntarians/63 14885/story.html?id=6314885 fekete, j. (2012a, march 10). bureaucrats must shift to efficiency and constraint: clement. canada.com. http://www2.canada.com/topics/ news/story.html?id=6282995 galloway, g. (2012, march 5). spare veterans from budget axe, opposition says. globe and mail update. http://m.theglobeandmail.com/news/ politics/ottawanotebook/spare-veterans-from-budget-axe-opposition says/article2358967/?service=mobile galloway, g. (2011, november 29). after the tory witch-hunt against the cbc, who’ll be next? globe and mail. http://www.theglobeandmail.com/ arts/television/after-thetory-witch-hunt-against-the-cbc-wholl-benext/article4179574/ glavin, t. (2012, may 7). something’s fishy with bill c-38. national post. http://www2.canada.com/ottawacitizen/news/archives/story. html?id=cb8b39a4f566-4e5a-a5c9-f3431c0dd554 government of canada (2009, january 27). canada’s economic action plan. budget 2009, tabled in the house of commons by j.m. flaherty, p.c., m.p. minister of finance. government of canada (2010, march 4). canada’s economic action plan, year 2: leading the way on jobs and growth. budget 2010, tabled in the house of commons by j.m. flaherty, p.c., m.p. minister of finance. government of canada (2011). infrastructure stimulus fund. infrastructure canada. http://www.infrastructure.gc.ca/prog/other-autres-eng. html#isf-fsi government of canada (2012, november 11). jobs, growth and long term prosperity, economic action plan 2012: the budget in brief. department of finance. http://www.budget.gc.ca/2012/rd-dc/brief-bref-2012-eng. pdf gray, k. (2011, august 10). a defenseless economy. the ottawa citizen. http://blogs.ottawacitizen.com/2011/08/10/a-defenceless-economy/ harmes, a. (2007). the political economy of open federalism. canadian journal of political science, 40(2), 417-437. harvey, d. (2003). the new imperialism. oxford: oxford university press. 56 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism harvie, d. & milburn, k. (2011, august 4). the zombie of neoliberalism can be beaten – through mass direct action. the guardian. http://www. guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/aug/04/neoliberalism-zombie action-phone-hacking innis, h. (1956). essays in canadian economic history. toronto: university of toronto press. kipp, k. (2012, march 15). most disabled access projects going to tory ridings: documents. postmedia news. http://www. calgaryherald.com/business/most+disabled+access+projects+going+ tory+ridings+documents/6309515/story.html krugman, p. (2010, july 1). op ed column: myths of austerity. the new york times. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/02/opinion/02krugman. html maher, s. (2011, november 30). harper’s pr obsession fostering paranoia and paralysis in the public service. canada.com. http://www2. canada.com/news/maher+harper+obsession+fostering+paranoia+pa ralysis+public+service/5792000/story.html?id=5792000 may, k. (2012, march 14). budget won’t reveal details of ps cuts. the ottawa citizen. from http://www.ottawacitizen.com/opinion/oped/ budget+reveal+details+cuts+clement+says/6303389/story.html mackinnon, d. & shaw, j. (2010). new state spaces, agency and scale: devolution and the regionalisation of transport governance in scotland. antipode, 42(5), 1226-1252. nadeau, r. (2008, march 25). the economist has no clothes: unscientific assumptions in economic theory are undermining efforts to solve environmental problems. the scientific american. http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=the-economisthas-no-clothes nguyen, l. (2012, february 24). jim flaherty says there ‘shouldn’t be any tax increases’ in next budget. postmedia news. http://www.theguardian. pe.ca/business/201202-24/article-2906460/jim-flaherty-says-thereshouldnt-be-any-tax-increases-innext-budget/1 oecd [organisation for economic development and cooperation] (2011). making the most of public investment in a tight fiscal environment: multilevel governance lessons from the crisis. paris: oecd. office of the information commissioner of canada (2010). special report to parliament: interference with access to information requests. ottawa, ontario. peck, j. & tickell, a. (2002). neoliberalizing space. antipode, 34(3), 380–404. pm of canada (2006, march 21). prime minister promotes open federalism. office of the prime minister of canada. retrieved september 30, 2012, from http://pm.gc.ca/eng/media.asp?id=1123. crisis and opportunism | 57 public works and government services canada [pwgsc] (2010). public accounts of canada, volume ii, details of expenses and revenues. government of canada, prepared by the receiver general of canada. public works and government services canada [pwgsc] (2005). public accounts of canada, volume ii, details of expenses and revenues. government of canada, prepared by the receiver general of canada. public works and government services canada [pwgsc] (2006). public accounts of canada, volume ii, details of expenses and revenues. government of canada, prepared by the receiver general of canada. public works and government services canada [pwgsc] (2007). public accounts of canada, volume ii, details of expenses and revenues. government of canada, prepared by the receiver general of canada. public works and government services canada [pwgsc] (2008). public accounts of canada, volume ii, details of expenses and revenues. government of canada, prepared by the receiver general of canada. public works and government services canada [pwgsc] (2009). public accounts of canada, volume ii, details of expenses and revenues. government of canada, prepared by the receiver general of canada. public works and government services canada [pwgsc] (2011). public accounts of canada, volume ii, details of expenses and revenues. government of canada, prepared by the receiver general of canada. pugliese, d. (2012, march 9). opposition mps say they’ll now think twice about accepting canadian forces’ invitations. the ottawa citizen. http://www.ottawacitizen.com/news/opposition%20they%20 think%20twice%20ab out%20accepting%20canadian%20forces%20 invitations/6280032/story.html ruckert, a. (2006). towards an inclusive-neoliberal regime of development: from the washington to the post-washington consensus. labour, capital and society, 39(1), 34-67. ruckert, a. (2009). periodizing neoliberal development policy: from destructive ‘roll back’ and constructive ‘roll out’ to inclusive neoliberalism. paper presented at the annual convention of the canadian political science association reynolds, n. (2011, september 6). jim flaherty: the master of stealth austerity. the globe and mail. http://www.theglobeandmail.com/reporton-business/robcommentary/jim-flaherty-the-master-of-stealthausterity/article627118/ stiglitz, j. e. (2012). the price of inequity: how today’s divided society endangers our future, norton: ny. the professional institute of the public service of canada (2011, july 28). privy council muzzles canadian scientist. http://www.pipsc.ca/portal/ page/portal/website/news/newsreleases/news/072811 58 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism varro, k. (2010). re-politicising the analysis of ‘new state spaces’ in hungary and beyond: towards an effective engagement with ‘actually existing neoliberalism.’ antipode, 42(5), 1253-1278. veldhuis, n. & lammam, c. (2012), march 5. the chopping block: cut $10-billion now. national post. http://opinion.financialpost. com/2012/03/05/the-chopping-blockcut-10-billion-now/ wells, p. & mcmahon, t. (2012, april 2). oil power. maclean’s magazine, p.16. corcoran, t. (2012, march 6). the chopping block: opinion. national post. http://www.nationalpost.com/opinion/where+flaherty+begin/6255598/ story.html williams, b. & mcneill, j. m. (2005). the current crisis in neoclassical economics and the case for an economic analysis based on sustainable development. u21 global working paper, no. 001/2005. williamson, j. (1990). latin american adjustment: how much has happened? washington, d.c.: institute for international economics. woods, m. (2012, april 17). federal budget: critics blast ottawa’s plan to overhaul environmental review process. the star. http://www. thestar.com/news/canada/politics/article/1162871—tories-introduce sweeping-changes-to-environmental-assessments 258 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism book review 500 years of indigenous resistance by gord hill. oakland, california: pm press, 2009. $10.00 us, paper. isbn: 978-1-60486-106-8. pages: 172. reviewed by kevin partridge1 gord hill originally published this work as part of a revolutionary indigenous newspaper in 1992 in order to provide a brief history of the colonization of the americas from 1492. it is aimed at a broad audience of people who are interested in reading a historical narrative that is often suppressed and excluded from many discussions of the colonization of the americas. it is well crafted for this purpose with its clear writing, brief length and interesting graphics by the author as well as the inclusion of some archival photographs. the arguments in the book are supported by a variety of citations and references that provide the reader with a good grasp of the field of research in which the author is locating his research. however, he does not reference many written sources and the book does not contain the sort of voluminous bibliographic information that is common to books aimed at a more academic audience. the author claims that this book is just a plain historical chronology, yet it is clearly guided by a theoretical understanding of colonization and historical development that is well developed and considerably at odds with much of history that is written from a eurocentric perspective. hill seems apologetic when he writes about his own lack of knowledge of “authentic indigenous philosophy” (p.5) but he provides a reflexive awareness of his own position as a member of the kwakiutl (kwakwaka’wakw) nation on the west coast, as well as his position as a political activist within a globalized system that continues to encroach upon indigenous lands. this is a book with a political purpose and it is useful for its qualities as a polemic and also for its straightforward explanation of the beliefs and motivations that lie behind the strong commitment shown by many people in indigenous activist communities around the globe. 1 kevin partridge is a ph.d. candidate in the department of sociology and anthropology at carleton university in ottawa. book review: 500 years of indigenous resistance | 259 this book should not be seen as a corrective to the current mainstream construction of the history of the americas a sort of liberal attempt to provide a balance of viewpoints but is instead an outline of a historical narrative that is created from the experiences of people who have often been eliminated from the historical record. the author is particularly interested in challenging the argument that colonization in the americas is a process that will eventually be of benefit to the colonized as well as the colonizer. he bluntly states that the colonization process has been an “american indian holocaust” (p.6) that resulted in the deaths of millions of people and the destruction of entire nations and their respective cultures and histories. he then goes on to provide some of the stories and evidence both of this destruction and the resistance that has accompanied it from the time of the first contact with europeans to current conflicts involving indigenous peoples. since the book was originally written in the early 1990s, the conflicts he describes include the oka confrontation in quebec, the lil’wat blockade in bc and an assault on logging operations on lubicon cree land in alberta. the book is composed of fifteen very short chapters that are organized in a broadly chronological order. they begin with a brief description of the multitude of peoples, nations and languages that were spread over the americas before columbus’s ship, the santa maria, landed somewhere in the caribbean region in 1492. the four pages allotted to this era is nowhere near enough space to do justice to the variety of histories that hill is trying to cover but he does convey a sense of the cultural richness of the americas. unfortunately, as he points out, there was little understanding of this cultural wealth on the part of the europeans who quickly grasped the material opportunities to finance their voyages by seizing goods and people using both deceit and superior weapons. this exploitation was rapidly formalized by the creation of colonial administrative structures guided by the expanding economic needs of european imperial countries. hill describes almost constant warfare and exploitation of labour, land and resources since european settlers first arrived. these struggles completely alter the social landscape of north america by bringing in people from many other places in the world as well as contributing to the deaths of many millions of indigenous people, the profound alteration of social structures that survived, and the export of a huge amount and variety of resources. hill provides a number of examples such as the brutal campaign to seize gold from the americas for shipment to spain (p.14). he also argues that there is a parallel history of resistance to these 260 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism changes. he shifts his focus in the last two chapters to more specific struggles as he cites examples of confrontations at oka, oldman river and in the lil’wat nation in british columbia to show that indigenous resistance is still an active and viable force within the political landscape of canada in particular. this book was originally written as a response to the 500th anniversary of the landing of the santa maria. hill is presenting a history of resistance to this silencing of voices that is both still present and still relevant within our current political environment. he is successful in putting forward a narrative that illustrates both continuity and complexity. there is no attempt here to create a comprehensive story of the many nations that have been involved in this process and the focus of this book is primarily on canadian history. nor is he trying to argue the ‘truth’ behind the narratives. the length of the book does not allow for a great deal of discussion of the history that he presents. it appears that the point of the book, however, is not just to talk about history but to help change it. this book is successful in contributing to both the political dialogues and the struggles in which it is located. despite hill’s own doubts about his place amongst an ‘authentic’ indigenous philosophical tradition, this book shows that he has a definite and unique contribution to make to that history and this book is useful for those who are looking for alternative historical narratives and for people who may be trying to understand the motivations and understandings that lie behind apparently widely separated expressions of indigenous resistance that repeatedly crop up in the mainstream news with little explanation. this work is a valuable contribution that could be very useful for teachers, activists and others who are interested in challenging the often complacent acceptance of the colonization of the americas. sujet de droit et sujets de droit: de la pratique juridiquc au pluriel daniel sansfacon cet article s ' adresse au droit. ii y est question de discours juridique mais aussi de discours marxiste sur le droit. par i'analyse d'un exemple conoret de discours juridique, i'auteur explore quelques problemes d'une theorie marxiste de droit, suggerant principalement une decentration du discours marxi3te , et propose une recherche ulterieure. alternate routes vol. 5 1982 68 this article deals with law and some problems in a marxist theory of law. although many marxian theorists treat the law as being concerned with a uniform subject, the argument here is that law, as a complex practice , creates different subjects, not all of which may be equated with homo economicus , a topic for future research i3 proposed. l'analyse marxiste de l'univers jurdique se contente souvent de l'articuler a l'etat conune forme necessaire de la domination de la forme marchande fetichisee et par la de la bourgeoisie. inversement, les jurisprudences offrent un discours idealiste, coupe de la materialite des pratiques sociales, qui presente le droit comme un ensemble de regies se developpant sur la base de relations evoluant vers la raison. le droit lui-meme par ailleurs rebute, par son langage formel, ses technical ites , sa complexite'. pourtant, le juridique est de toutes les relations sociales. pourtant aussi, l'imagerie juridique la plus vehiculee, et apparemment la plus simple, 1 ' idee de justice, est aussi, peut-etre, l'une des notions les plus complexes. dans le droit, de facon indelebile, il y a d'abord le sujet de droit. si l'on peut dire "nulla crimen, nulla poene 69 sine lege", a plus forte raison peut-on dire sans sujet point de droit. or cette question du sujet est elle-meme rien moins que fort complexe. et si 1 'analyse marxiste du droit et de son sujet a certes permis des propres, elle n'en demeure pas moins gravement fautive. c'est du moins ce que pretend cette courte et bien partielle etude, ou il sera question non plus de sujet de droit mais bien des sujets du juridique. l'univers juridique le juridique occupe une place particuliere dans la formation sociale capitaliste. ii se place a la fois dans la societe, ou il regie les differends qui opposent les individus entre eux ou individus et institutions; mais il se situe aussi au-dessus d'elle en ce qu'il se veut le rempart de la legitimite (e.g. la constitution) et la representation (ideale) d'un ordre ultime a atteindre. qui plus est, le droit ne se limite pas a regler un champ donn§ d'activites mais s'etend a toutes les spheres de la vie sociale: depuis les relations economiques jusqu'aux formes politiques, en passant par le fonctionnement des institutions et appareils d'etat jusqu'au comportement individuel. le juridique ne constitute done certes pas un champ monolithique qui se pourrait aborder dans son ensemble d'un coup d'oeil global et general. bien au contraire la sphere juridique ressemble a un molosse eclate. pourtant, la systematisation et la technique juridiques, dans la forme du droit et de la loi, presentent un caractere unifie sous les principes d'equite, de justice et de "due process". ainsi, il n'est pas rare d'entendre parler de faqon equivalente de droit et de justice, comme de deux cotes inseparables d'une alternate routes vol. 5 1982 70 meme piece. les reglements de litiges ou les assurances juridiques a la legitimite deviennent justice: que justice soit faite ! et le ce*lebre symbole de la balance juridique de reapparai tre . ii y a la une premiere confusion: celle du droit et de la loi, dont il sera question plus loin. mais il faut ici souligner qu'entre la loi adoptee par le legislateur dans une enceinte democratique et la loi prononcee par le juge qui, dans 1 'enceinte de la cour, devient droit, se glissent, a prime abord, des differences. une premiere se trouve dans l'acte lui-meme: l'elu du peuple qui accorde son appui i un texte le fait au nom, dit-il, de ses commettants . le juge qui se prononce sur un texte et l'evalue "a sa juste valeur" le fait au nom de la justice, dont un tiers l'a imparti. une seconde tient i 1 ' impact et au contenu de la decision: l'elu accorde ou refuse son appui, c'est-a-dire qu'il se pose publiquement en faveur ou en defaveur d'un texte. le juge qui tranche un litige accorde un droit et/ou refuse une pretention de droit ou de fait: il departit done des odposants. une troisieme difference apparente tient a la division des pouvoirs: l'elu appartient au corps l€gislatif et le juge au corps judiciaire, et si l'un et l'autre travaillent de concert a batir l'ordre social, ils n'en restent pas moins independants ; le premier travaille a ^laborer une politique de bien commun, le second al'appliquer i la transformer en "common law" du moins a 1 'experience de la realitg. ces differences ne sont rien moins qu ' apparences ce qui ne signifie pas que pour concretes qu'elles soient elles 71 n'aient une efficace propre dans la formation des pratiques sociales et individuelles . d'abord 1'acte. l'elu avons-nous dit le conjugue a 1 'opinion publique, le juge au texte du droit dans lequel se decouvre la justesse du legislateur, et la justice par extension. de deux actes d'abord differencies il ne reste qu'un, celui de l'expression sociale d'un pouvoir. ii pourrait bien ne pas s'agir du meme douvoir cependant puisque , selon la seconde difference l'elu tranche pour exposer publiquement ses convictions, alors que le juge decide impartialement de la justice. encore que justice et convictions ne soient pas si eloignees au sens ou les convictions du juge decideront du lieu ou se situe la justice. mais surtout , il s'agit du meme exercice social du pouvoir en ce que l'un et 1 'autre produisent, via des moyens divergeants certes , une discrimination. discrimination, nous dit la troisieme difference entre le bien commun et les inte'rsts specifiques pour le legislateur et entre justice et injustice pour le juge. dans un cas comme dans 1' autre cependant, cette discrimination s'exerce a partir des representations faites devant l'autorite par les parties antagonistes defendant chacune leur conception de ce qui est et de ce qui doit etre. voila justement ce qui unit davantage juge et legislateur que ce qui ne les separe: l'etre et le devoir-etre. parce que munis chacun d'un mandat sur l'origine duquel nous ne nous attarderons pas , elu et juge decident de ce qui est et de ce qui doit etre. et au nom de qui, sinon, en derni^re instance, du "sujet"? car dans l'un et l'autre cas, c'est le meme sujet qui git au centre des preoccupations du legislateur et du juge. ici, sujet politique alternate routes vol. 5 1982 72 et suiet de droit se confondent, indif ferencies et pourtant sollicites di f f gremment , qui au nom du bien commun, qui au nora de la iustice. en somme, le sujet est a la fois le sujet de 1 ' ir.teret general et des interets particul iers . apparemment done , et apparemment de fagons distinctes, le legislateur et le judiciaire investissent le sujet. mais quel suiet? le politique dit l'un; le justiciable dit l'autre; et en derniere instance ils ne font qu'un. ii y a la un discours commun. discours qui curieusement est commun aussi a certains marxistes analysant le juridique. ainsi, pashukanis (1978), bien que cherchant une analyse de la forme juridique dans les relations objectives qui la fondent et qu'elle vient ensuite regler, constate-til que le forme juridique correspond en derniere analyse a la forme marchandise de l'schange capitaliste. en d'autres termes , la forme marchandise fetichisee par la valeur acquise dans le processus d' exploitation du travail est transoosee dans le domaine juridique via le marche. dans la forme iuridique, se revele le fetichisme du sujet porteur de droits qui est libre d'echanger et de s'echanger, a valeur egale, sur le marche. de meme , miaille (1976) soutient un raisonnement similaire. selon lui, seul le concept d'une personnalite' iuriiique pourvue de droits et libre de participer au marche' pouvait permettre la realisation globale du processus de production capitaliste: en effet, le suiet de droit est sujet de droits virtuels, tout a fait abstraits: anim6 par sa seule volont6, il a la possibility, la liberty ie s'obliger, notamment de vendre sa force de travail a un autre sujet de droit (miaille, 19^6:132) . 73 ainsi, la ou les relations de production capitalistes se developpent, et la ou l'echange marchand est fetichise, il y aura necessairement creation d'un sujet de droit. en somme , la categorie de sujet de droit permet "la realisation des echanges marchands generalises" (miaille, 1976:132). bien que de maniere differente, et inspire plus particulierement des travaux d'althusser, edelman soutient aussi la centralite du sujet dans le discours juridique: l 1 ideologic juridique se denonce en dressant son acte de naissance. et son acte de naissance, c'est la postulation que l'homme est naturellement un sujet de droit, i.e. un proprietaire en puissance, puisqu'il est de son essence de s'approprier la nature (edelman, 1973:17). c'est de la qu'edelman developpe son essai sur le droit et la photographie . dans ce processus ou, en un premier temps le droit nie le suj et photographe en niant son activite comme artistique pour la releguer au plan d'une technique, et ou en un second temps, le capital investissant le champ photographique et cinematographique , le droit reconnait un sujet de droit qui cependant est le producteur, i.e. le capitaliste, et non plus le "createur" i.e. le photographe ou le realisateur on reconnait ici les effets de denegation et de deplacement althusseriens il faut voir, nous dit edelman, le cycle du capital se refermer sur lui-meme. ce a quoi on assiste ici, c'est done a une "sur-appropriation du reel", e'est-a-dire a 1 ' appropriation d'un reel "deja investi par la propriete" (1973:29-30). de dire edelman, dans ce proces, "le droit fixe et assure la realisation, comme donne naturel, de la sphere de la circulation" et simultanement "il rend possible la alternate routes vol. 5 1982 74 production" [1973:37). le sujet de droit est done encore 1 ' incarnation privilegiee de son interpellation par le processus de circulation, puisqu'il est constitue libre, volontaire, propr ietaire , en mesure de contracter, e'est-a-dire de se vendre comme objet sur le marche . le problemat ique du sujet de droit n'appartient done pas qu'au juridique lui-meme. bien sur, elle y est posee en des termes fort differents: en termes idealistes, theologiques ou "socioloqiques" " . ainsi, le sujet juridique y est ici un sujet naturel, i.e. naturellement donne pour le droit soit par la volonte divine, soit par la nature des choses. ou si le sujet est socialement cree, il sera dans l'ordre des choses qu'une juridicite vienne regler les interactions humaines. que se soit dans la perspective marxiste ou autre, le sujet occupe done une position centrale dans le droit. mais plus particul ierement pour la perspective marxiste, le sujet juridique se confond avec le sujet economique. on essentialise ainsi la forme juridique, e'est-a-dire qu'on lui donne une essence qui est celle de correspondre aux pratiques economiques, et encore plus, de les permettre meme. d'autre part, on reduit la forme juridique \ son expression fetichiste du sujet comme sujet libre et possedant une valeur (d'6change) egale. comme le souligne hirst (1979:111), ce genre d'analyse inverse en les repliquant les perspectives idealistes. de meme, ces approches presupposent une efficace au droit non seulement dans la creation du sujet juridique mais dans la regulation des pratiques economiques . enfin, ces positions ont deux autres effets complementaires : elles fetichisent la forme juridique, 75 i.e. en font une superstructure ideologique qui en soi n'est qu'un "derive" des conditions in f rastructurales , mais paradoxalement, elles accordent au droit une legitimite qu'il se pretend, a savoir sa capacite de definir le sujet et ses comportements . debusquer le discours juridique ne doit pas signifier le reduire a un discours exterieur ni lui faire dire ou faire ce qu'il ne dit ou ne fait pas. ii ne s'agit pas davantage de chercher derriere le discours juridique comme si l'on cherchait a soulever un voile qui cacherait la "vraie" realite, bien que ce qui est derriere le juridique serve sans doute a le comprendre dans sa pratique. nous en donnerons ici un exemple, a partir d'une realite juridique, celle du "nul n'est cense ignorer la loi", exemple qui ne se veut ni exhaustif de la question ni necessairement novateur, mais qui cherche plutot a introduire a une preoccupation plus vaste. la connaissance du juridique le code criminel canadien' 3 dit expressement que "1 ' ignorance de la loi chez une personne qui commet une infraction n'excuse pas la perpetration de cette infraction" f a-19) . c'est dire que tout individu est repute connaitre la loi. mais c'est aussi signifier que la loi ne se preoccupe de cette connaissance que chez 1 ' infracteur : chacun est un infracteur en puissance, mais la structure juridique institutionnelle n'a pas a s 'assurer de cette connaissance chez tous les individus, a priori, sans parler du fait bien connu qu'on n'enseigne pas la loi a l'ecole. certaines regies viennent limiter 1 ' appl ication de ce principe general: l'age de juvenile par example 1 'enfant alternate routes vol. 5 1982 76 de moins de sept ans ne peut "etre declare coupable a l'e'gard d'un acte ou d'une omission de sa dart" (a-12); l'enfant entre sept et quatorze ans doit etre "en etat de comprendre la nature et les consequences de sa conduite et de juger qu ' i 1 agissait mal" (a-13) , ou les cas d'alienation mentale (a-16) ou de deficience mentale (a-2) . hormis ces restrictions, le principe de la connaissance du droit est assuietti a certaines contraintes. on doit d'abord distinguer les formes de connaissance et ensuite s'assurer de la possibilite materielle, pour 4 l'individu, de connaitre. 1. les formes de connaissance la connaissance constitue bien sur un evenement factuel, mesurable. ou bien l'individu connait, ou bien il ne connait pas. cette dichotomie ne rend certes pas compte des niveaux de qualite" de la connaissance. le droit ne demande pas a l'individu de connaitre les subtilit^s, les interpretations de la loi. pourtant , on le sait, ces memes subtilites ou interpretations peuvent decider de la culpabilite ou de 1' innocence. le droit n'est-il pas d'ailleurs ainsi fait que le r£sultat d'un litige n'est jamais connu a 1 ' avance ? quoiqu'il en soit, le droit n'exige du sujet que l'effort diligent qu'il est en mesure de faire, pour connaitre les lois que le parlement adopte. a l'aide d'une situation quelque peu diff€rente, on peut decouvrir les formes de connaissance que souleve le tribunal. le code criminel prevoit a l'article 21, qu'"est partie a une infraction quiconque... b) accomplit ou omet d'accomplir quelque chose en vue d'aider quelqu'un a la commettre" (nous 77 soulignons d.s.). cet article peut etre invoque pour signifier que l'accuse aurait du, avait les moyens de connaitre la loi, et que son ignorance a permis la commission d'une infraction. r. v woolworth souleve ce point. sans entrer dans les details de l'affaire, precisons qu'une infraction a ete commise par deux individus qui avaient conclu une entente avec un magasin woolworth de toronto, pour vendre, dans le magasin, des stylos a bille, moyennant une ristourne de trente pour cent a la compagnie. condamnee en premiere instance sous pretexte, entre autres, que la compagnie "aurait du savoir" ce qui se passait dans son magasin, le tribunal d'appel rejette les motifs, recoit l'appel et casse le jugement. ii stipule dans son jugement que l'on doit distinguer entre une connaissance de fait qu'une infraction est commise, une connaissance irresdonsable ou, malgre sa connaissance, le sujet ne s'assure pas de ses fondements ni n'informe d'autres autorites competentes de cette connaissance, et finalement une connaissance constructive, ou l'individu ne savait pas mais avait la possibility, sinon le devoir, de connaitre. si les deux premieres formes relevent immediatement de la norme juridique, la troisieme, la "connaissance constructive" ne constitue tout simplement pas un cas de droit ( r. v woolworth, loc . cit.: 30) . c'est cette seule forme de connaissance qu'aurait pu avoir woolworth des delits commis sur sa propriete et le tribunal affirme ne pouvoir en tenir compte. dans le cas de la connaissance de la loi, seules les deux premieres formes existent. la connaissance de fait est une connaissance postulee chez tous les individus, sous respect alternate routes vol. 5 1982 78 des contraintes d'ordre legal. ouant 1 la connaissance irresponsable, on parlera ici d'un sujet qui, croyant qu'existe une loi, commet un acte, sans s'etre assure qu'existe cette loi, et l'enfreint ainsi. z. la connaissance rip la lni le cas de r. v catholique (1980) expl ique 1 ' element materiel de la connaissance et renferme aussi la question de la connaissance constructive. ici, un individu est condamne a la peine maximale (six semaines d' emprisonnement) , pour avoir enfreint un reolement local le ''snowdrift liquor prohibition regulations act" concernant la nossession de boissons alcoolisees sur le territoire de snowdrift aux territoires du n'ord ouest .pendant son emprisonnement , 1' individu rencontre un avocat oui lui suggere d'en apneler de la sentence. la cour d'aupel constate alors que cette legislation n'a pas ete propremer.t oubliee par le conseil leqislatif, et qu'il est, des lors, inacceptable en droit, "qu 'une personne soit condamnee, punie, et derde sa liberte personnelle par une sentence d'emprisonnement , pour avoir enfreint un reglement dont elle q n'avait ni connaissance ni avis a ce moment." ii appert clairement ici qu'un individu doit faire des efforts nomaux dour connaltre la loi, la connaissance du droit, a contrario de celie d'une infraction, est done necessairement constructive mai? jue ceci implique aussi que le legislateur s'assure que les lois sont publiees correctement et qu'une p£riode temps est accordee aux individus pour prendre connaissance de la loi .ivant qu'elle ne prenne effet. nous avons done la totality du principe: ignorantia 79 facti excusat, ignorantia juris non excusat. d'une part, le sujet ne peut construire sa connaissance de la loi que si les circonstances le lui permettent. le legislateur doit fournir au sujet la possibilite de prendre connaissance des lois: par une publication dans une gazette officielle par exemple. ce qui nous met ici en presence du sujet-etat, qui devient sujetde-droit. de plus, le suj et-individu beneficie d'une autre possibilite: s'il a fait effort diligent pour connaitre la loi, peut-on lui tenir rigueur d'une infraction commise, autrement dit, y a-t-il infraction? r. v maclean (1974) repond par la negative. dans ce cas en effet, la cour maintient que l'individu, ayant demontre sa bonne volonte, ayant tente de construire, par les canaux usuels, sa connaissance de la loi, ne peut etre accuse d'une infraction puisque depourvu de mens rea, d'inten9 v v tion coupable. cette autre exception a la regie generale ne peut etre invoquee constamment sous peine de rendre inoperant le droit, ni ne peut etre invoquee en toutes circonstances; certaines infractions ou une responsabilite generale suffit a demontrer la culpabilite ne pretent pas a une telle excuse. cette autre exception souleve ici le probleme de 1' interpretation du droittc'est par le travail interpretatif des juges que la loi devient droit, i.e. que les intentions du legislateur sont accordees aux conditions concretes de la volonte collective. autrement dit, les individus, meme connaissant une loi, peuvent commettre une infraction qui n'en sera finalement une qu ' a la loi et non au droit, en raison d'une part de leur volonte de connaitre la loi et d'autre part de 1 ' interpretation du droit. ce qui aioute force au precepte imperieux pour le alternate routes vol. 5 1982 le-islateur de divulguer ses prescriptions, c'est done dire que l'acte legislatif, s'il definit les bornes de l'interet general, ne peut , en droit commun, specifier toutes les regies et toutes les applications de ces regies qu'il adopte. le travail de la cour pourvoiera justement & ces lacunes qui n'en sont pas. et c'est dans ce travail juridique que la loi devient droit. c'est aussi dans ce travail que le sujet politique devient sujet de droit, pour utiliser le langage theorioue deja mentionne. nous verrons , 4 nartir d'un extrait d'un discours juridique, que la coherence interne de ces raisonnements logiques n'est pas de toute rigueur, que le discours apparemment evident contient sa propre opacite, et surtout que le sujet de droit n'est plus un mais multiple. les sujets du juridique le juridique parle. ii se parle k lui-meme d'abord: il definit, dans sa pratique, les conditions de sa reproduction. ii parle aux sujets: a l'etat qu'il interpelle comme son fondateur, lui rappelant aussi les bornes a respecter; aux suiets qu'il pretend souverains et qu'il limite. ii parle enfin d'un sujet: celui de l'ordre a maintenir comme ordre publique indispensable. mais ces locuteurs ne sont pas identiques. pas davantage d'ailleurs que les sujets (matieres) de 12 leurs discours. ainsi cet extrait de r. v maclean: it is true that on occasion the word legis has been substituted for juris and the maxim (ignorantia... d.s.) does apply to that kind of law, but only when the lex, i.e. the positive command of the prince or legislature, has entered into the realm of jus, i.e., the realm of legal right 81 and obligation generally. this distinction... has become obscured in common law countries by the lack of appropriate legal terminology and the consequent use of "law" for the entire field. lex becomes part of jus by promulgation and assimilation. for if an enactment is notably at odds with general notions of justice it usually suffers considerable attrition in judicial and other leeal interpretations until its rough edges have been smoothed down enough to fit into the general plan. the point of noting this however is that it again accentuates the need in justice to give publicity to an enactment ... if the subject is to be required to conform himself to it. un discours demembre les acteurs sont campes , ici, comme membres d'un seul et meme processus: d'une part les elements abstraits, lex et jus, la loi et le droit, d'autre part les sujets qui sont determines et determinants de ces elements, a savoir l'etat, le tribunal, l'individu. la loi, lex, c'est la volonte du prince, son activity legislative democratique en tant qu'elu par le peuple; la loi devrait done exprimer la volonte du peuple. le droit, jus, c'est la justice faite, c'est l'activite juridique rendue conforme a la volonte du peuple, ce "plan general" ou s'exercent les grandes idees d'egalite, de liberte. d'une certaine fa<;on, le discours pose ici le probleme de l'etre et du devoiretre. peut-on dire que "lex" est l'etre, le fait, et que "jus" est le devoir-etre? une reponse affirmative est tentante puisqu'en effet, la loi demeure un outil imparfait en face du devoir-etre, la valeur ,realise"e dans le droit. mais le devoiretre realise dans le droit devient fait, et le tribunal nous dit justement que l'activite du juge consiste a effectuer ce passage. de plus, ce devoir-etre, le jus, correspond-il vraiment a la volonte collective, aux valeurs des individus qui forment alternate routes vol. 5 1982 82 une society donnee, regie par un corps juridique donne? de meme, une volonte collective est-elle possible; de quoi s'agitil? enfin, le juridique, de par sa nature ici decrite, d'etreen-devenir, peut-il jamais etre donne? ces questions, le juridique ne les pose pas. et ces questions ne s'imposent pas, sinon justement, par leur absence. les acteurs que sont le prince, le tribunal et le sujet, le discours les isole. d'un cote, le politique qui decide pour les sujets. de 1 'autre les sujets qui sont agis dans le droitjus. au centre le juge, qui mediatise les deux poles, muni d'une sorte de super-conscience, capable de comprendre le message de prince et de connaitre la volonte du peuple que d'ailleurs le pouvoir voulait exprimer, bien que parfois gauchement si l'on peut dire. la boucle apparait: le sujet collectif, expression de la valeur, porte au pouvoir un politique qui emet des regies, transformees par le juridique pour que le sujet "s'y con forme'. premiere question: le suj.et qui elit le politique est-il le meme que celui qui doit se conformer? autrement dit, notre sujet politique egale-t-il sujet de droit? bien que d ' importance , cette question sera laissee sans reponse ici. seconde question: ce passage de la loi au droit n ' exprime-t-il qu'un probleme terminologique comme le pretend le tribunal? nous suggererons quelques responses. 1. contradictions et repression premiere possibility, le probleme ne releve que d'une question terminologique , dans le corps juridique lui-meme. mais pourquoi cette confusion, deja au moins bi-centenaire devrait-elle persister? le juge n'aurait-il pu suggerer, dans 83 le meme effort, une solution a cette navrante situation? les linguistes competents en langue anglaise feraient-ils defaut? fut-elle aussi technique et concise, cette langue doit tout de meme permettre de resoudre de telles embuches. s'il s'agit d'un probleme terminologique , nous pouvons supposer qu'il est entretenu par le droit lui-meme qui ne fait pas d'effort diligent afin de le solutionner. mais encore faudrait-il savoir pourquoi cette confusion particuliere et pas une autre est entretenue. si le droit, comme le dretend la theorie de la division des pouvois, est en relation d'independance et de collaboration tout a la fois avec le legislatif, il se trouve peut-etre la une explication. nous avons deja entame cette question. ii s'agit de tenter ici d'aller un peu plus loin. nous avons vu plus haut que, dans les differences apparentes entre le travail legislatif et le travail judiciaire se trouvent des similitudes certaines. mais il y a plus encore: il y a peut-etre le fait, comme le pretend miaille (1978: 70-87; 105-124) que le systeme juridique s'est eleve, dans l'etat, a l'epoque de l'extinction du feodal isme ,en accord avec la transformation du fief en bien economique, permettant ainsi "la privatisation de toute la vie sociale ' de sorte que "les rois purent, par la suite, donner 1' image d'un interet "public"" fl 978: 60-61) . de sorte encore que l'etat liberal a pu se specifier "sur une double separation: separation entre la societe civile et l'etat...; separation des pouvoirs dans l'etat..." (1978:87), qui ne constituent que les "figures" de l'autonomie de l'etat. figures recouvrant done en fait la nature de classes de l'etat et la cachant sous le voile juridique. ainsi, le droit alternate routes vol. 5 1982 84 et la loi seraient deux figures d'une seule realite: "law". mais alors, comment se fait-il que le droit anglais n'ait pas exige cette meme distinction et n'ait pas cree sa propre figure de style? s'agit-il des conditions historiques sur lesquelles s'est eleve l'etat anglais? ii appert pour sur que le droit de la common law et que le droit continental existent bien ... et non pas comme simples figures de style. faudraitil supposer des lors que ce sont des differences propres aux systemes iuridiques d'abord, systemes qui eux originent de conditions materielles particuli&res , qui expliquent ici l'absence et la la presence? nous sommes enclins a penser qu'avant de chercher du cote des fonctions de ce manque et de sa relation avec d'autres pratiques, il y aurait lieu de chercher d'abord a le saisir dans le juridique lui-meme. seconde possibility, le probleme n'est pas terminologique. ou bien l'habitude est tellement bien ancree, qu'on a renonce, dans la profession, a combler cette lacune. la encore, on ne repondrait qu 1 imparfaitement a la question puisque ce qui est ici en jeu c'est bien la raison de cette habitude. ou bien alors c'est que de lacune il n'y a que dans les subtilites juridiques, c'est-a-dire que lorsque le droit est confronts a lui-meme. et de fait nous assistons bien, dans ce cas-ci, a une reflexion du droit sur lui-meme: place dans une situation ou il y a erreur dans la loi, le tribunal doit eviter une erreur de droit. l'erreur de loi, c'est celle du politique, qui, par son pouvoir impositif, pour assurer la dissuasion et la conforrute, instaure a la fois une responsabi 1 i t€ legale universelle: la connaissance de la loi, et une defense contre 85 cette responsabilite , au nora de la volonte lihre. l'erreur de droit serait done de condamner un individu qui ne pouvait savoir comme dans la cause r. v catholique ou qui croyai t savoir comme dans la cause r. v maclean bafouant alors les idees generales du citoyen quant a la justice. le juriste se doit done de creer une difference, pour fins de resoudre une contradiction temporaire. d ' ou une troisieme possibility deja suggeree: il n'y a pas, comme le pretend le juge, confusion juridique ou terminologique. a contrario, il y a la une situation qui est caracteristique au droit commun, e'est-a-dire une situation qui correspond au developpement historique de la pratique juridique britannique. et avec cette pratique juridique, en elle et derriere elle, une evolution historique particuliere qui ne se resume pas a une determination en derniere instance ou autrement, mais qui possede sa propre signification. et si l'on accepte 1 'argument presente plus tot sur le role du juge comme mediateur entre le sujet-etat et le suj et-individu, ce qu'on constate ici e'est bien plus une repression par le juge de son role mediateur, ou par une inversion, le juge desoriente ce role. en effet, le juge remet le fardeau au legislateur, son collaborateur gemellaire, de faire en sorte que le sujet-individu reconnaisse le sujet-etat et se reconnaisse ensuite dans le droit (law) comme suj et-de-droit . un discours decentre ce que le juge signifie ici, explicitement , e'est son inquietude comme mediateur, devant les incongruences des deux protagonistes que sont l'etat et 1' individu. ce qu'il ne sigalternate routes vol. 5 1982 86 ni f ie das clairement, c'est la nature de ce role de mediateur. dans le premier cas , il propose un moyen de sortir de 1 ' impasse, et cree la division loi-droit. dans le second cas, il s'instaure comme centre du processus juridique, mediateur neutre, parfait interpr^te de deux ensembles de volontes. l'un ne peut aller sans l'autre. le juge ne peut se donner comme medium sans l'existence de deux poles qu'il relie. ii ne deut se donner comme exercant ce passage de la loi au droit, que comme medium neutre, sujet central. c'est done a soi-meme que s'adresse le juridique. puisqu'en effet, en s'adressant au lecislateur, comme a son double, le juriste s'adresse en ^ait au juridique comme ne pouvant en fa\t se contenir tout entier. car de meme que le droit n'est pas dans la loi mais est obtenu par un processus de transformation (et de denlacement?) que le juge appelle promulgation et assimilation, de meme, le juridique ne peut contenir tous les suiets de droit. le juridique s'adresse ainsi aux sujetsde-droit qui sont pourvus en droit d 'obi igat ions et de droits, et de ce fait, il les cree. mais il les cree de facon imparfaite et provisoire. imnarfaite tant que lex ne devient pas ius; provisoire tant que lex n'est pas connue, ou changee par le legislateur. ainsi done, cette categorie de sujet de droit que visent aussi bien le juriste que certains marxistes n'estelle pas fixe ni stable ni uniaue mais au contraire mouvante, chanqeante et multinle. celui qu'on nomme theor iauement ou i ur idiquement sujet de droit apparait rlutot multiple qu'uniiue. la boucle nui origine du sujet collectif sujet de droit pour se refermer sur lui , pose, dans sa circularite meme, des 87 sujets qui ne sont pas necessairement sujets-de-droit . le sujet politique, on l'a deja mentionne, n'egale pas de facto le sujet de droit. l'etat on le sait, peut etre hors le droit, il peut meme etre contre le droit. mais il demeure sujet de droit au moins dans certaines de ses functions. le juridique d'autre dart, se parle avons-nous dit. en ce sens, il se cree lui-meme comme sujet de ses propres transformations. et le sujet economique pourrait aussi etre mentionne. en somme, d'une sujet unique il faut bien plutot passer a une multiplicity de sujets dans le droit. ce qui par ailleurs, ne signi^ie pas que la categorie sujet de droit soit eclatee a tel point qu'elle ne permette plus de comprendre le fonctionnement du droit. ii semble au contraire que c'est bien a un processus de creation de sujets de droit que s 'affaire, entre autres, le droit, et en ce sens, 1 'analyse de la pratique juridique implique un recours a cette categorie. ii faut cependant se garder de reduire cette categorie a une expression simpliste. conclusion: l'analyse de la pratique juridique la question de jus et lex, et devoir-etre et etre, souleve done avec acuite la nature sociale du droit, sa materiality comme corps normatif formel, et son ideologie comme ensemble deja oriente, dans une certaine mesure, par une pratique discursive de classe, au sens ou se laisse percevoir le droit, e'est-a-dire comme relation sociale sp€cifique, inscrite dans une formation sociale historique, celle de la societe bourgeoise, et non pas comme simple reflet de la volonte bourgeoise. alternate routes vol. s 1982 88 a travers la categorie sujet de droit, c'est non settlement toute une pratique mais aussi toute une pratique theorique qui sont en cause. ii ne s'agit plus ici, de concevoir le juridique a travers les categories qu'il presente pour le demasquer comme une absence ou un reflet, fut-il speculaire. le juridique peut bien etre une persona (au sens grec du terme) , tout comme il instaure une "personne" juridique. mais c'est justement a travers cette personnalite qu'il faut le decouvrir et 1 ' analyser . de plus, le juridique se presente dans l'etat et dans une formation sociale donnee. mais les liens qui l'unissent a ces autres pratiques ne peuvent etre reduits a des determinismes formels. le juridique a une histoire plus lonpue que l'etat et que le caditalisme , faut-il le rappeler. faut-il souligner aussi que le juridique n'est pas soumis aux memes crises que l'etat ou que le mode de production economique. oue le juridique puisse servir certaines fonctions et, comme 18 le suggerent par exemple les auteurs d'un recent ouvrage , oarticiper dans l'etat a assurer la domination hegemonique, et en temps de crise, a s'affirmer comme le rempart de l'ordre etabli, ne saurait resumer tout le juridique. ne serait-ce ^ue parce que le juridique vehicule une pratique ideologique rart icul ierement vivace, ramifiee et £scterique, il ne se resume pas, selon nous, a quelques liens mecaniques ou expressifs . ce sont la du moins quelques principes generaux a partir jesquels nous travaillons presentement a une recherche jur la privaute au canada. la loi sur la vie privge au canada 89 loi c-l 7 6 adoptee en 1974 par le parlement canadien se situe justement au carrefour d'une pratique juridique apparemment centree sur le sujet de droit puisque son objectif est, of f iciellement , de delimiter les zones publiques et les zones privees via les pratiques policieres. l'analyse de cette loi tentera de deboucher non seulement sur une comprehension historique de la pratique juridique mais aussi sur une vision theorique plus globale de 1 ' articulation du juridique dans 1 'etat . notes 1. c'est aussi ce que soutient par example, vincent (1973: 40-41) : la societe syllanagmatique , c'est-a-dire fond6e sur la reciprocity des obligations, apparalt en realite comme une societe* de la division et de la domination dans laquelle 1 ' independance personnelle est construite sur la dependance materielle ... le droit trouve par consequent sa validite dans la f&rantie et l a defense de la separation ... au sein de la socialisation..., d'oii son caractere d'obligation opposable a tous . en ce sens il ne se confond pas immediatement avec les interets des classes dominantes tout en traduisant les valeurs profondes qui les inspirent. indispensable aux rapports sociaux capitalistes , il en est inseparable. sur le formalisme juridique inspire de pashukanis, voir aussi hirsch,1978: blanke e_t al_,1978; kinsey, 1979; et jessop,1980. 2. on nourrait citer ici presque toute la jurisprudence. contentons-nous , pour la perspective idealiste, de renvoyer 4 villey (1968; 1969), pour la perspective theologique, qui est une section de la precedente, a schwarz-lieberman (1978) et nour la perspective ''sociologique ', a poun-' (1942; 1959) et a podgorecki (1974). on en trouvera une excellente critique dans poulantzas (1965) et dans miaille (1976). 3. code criminel, s.r.c.,1970, chap. c-34, et lois connexes par l. saintonge-poitevin. montreal: wilson et lafleur, 1978. 90 4. ii s'agit en somme des deux aspects d'une definition de la connaissance . l'aspect formel, abstrait, correspond aux elements conceptuels de la connaissance: l'acte de volonte, la curiosite aussi de l'individu, entrent ici en jeu. dans l'aspect concret-materiel , ce ne sont plus les capacites volitives ou intellectuelles de l'individu que le droit evalue, mais la mater ialite des documents legaux disponibles. dans le premier cas on demandera: le sujet veut-il connaitre? et dans le second cas, le sujet peut-il connaitre? 5. cf. long v state (delaware) (1949), cite dans r. v maclean, 104 (1974) . 6. r. v f.w.woolworth co. ltd. (1974) 24 cf. aussi roper v taylor's central garage (exeter) ltd. (1951) et r. v kester (1980) entre autres. 8. r. v catholique, loc. cit , : 69, nous traduisons. cf. lim chin aik v queen (1963) , ou le juge note que la connaissance concrete d'une regie est un element essentiel de 1' intention criminelle, du princip de "mens rea". voir aussi r. v michelin tires manufacturing (canada) ltd., (1976), et r. v dry bones (1970). 9. voir aussi r. v de marco (1973), ou le iuge reintroduit la notion "d ' apparence de droit", qui signifie que la ou un individu a agi honnetement en se croyant dans le bon droit, ou ik ou l'individu croit honnetement que les faits sont legaux, il ne peut etre tenu responsable, meme si, en droit, il a illegalement agi. voir aussi r. v howson (1966). 10. cf. r. v villeneuve (1968). voir aussi long v state (delaware) in r. v maclean, loc . cit . : 105: "the reasons for disallowing it are practical considerations dictated by deterrent effects upon the administration and enforcement of the criminal law. which are deemed likely to result if it were allowed as a general defence 11. cf. miaille, op . cit . 127-158. voir aussi sala-molins l. 197-7 : 101-126 et 131-146. 12. r, v maclean, loc . cit . : 104; nous laissons en langue anglaise cette citation puisque, telle quelle, elle est au coeur de ce qui suit. 15. le terme "law" en effet est herite du droit brit annique 14. on constatera ici 1 ' importance que prendrait une analyse du sujet qui elit et du sujet qui se conforme. 13. voir entre autres poulantzas, 1978. ii ne s'agit pas ici que des etats "spe'ciaux" ou "anormaux" mais bien de situations part iculieresdans l'etat "normal". 91 16. nous renvoyons le lecteur a la these de poulantzas (1965), pour un expose detaille de cette question. 17. dujardin p., j. michel (1978), qui deplorent en premier lieu la trop longue periode "stal inienne" de 1 'economisme , "cette conception lineaire et unilateral du developpement historique concu comme entierement determine par un schema economique" (15) et qui "aboutit... a une non-analyse "( 15) du droit entre autres. cependant, il n'en reste pas moins que "la transformation du rapport economique en rapport juridique, done 1 ' occultat ion du premier sous le second, sont permises par 1 ' idee d'autonomie du suiet de droit et renvoient encore une fois aux categories politiques bourgeoises fondamentales" (22), de sorte "qu'il n'y a plus de place que pour une anthropologic economique ou le droit trouve la position qui est la sienne" (23) et que finalement "rapporter le droit a la circulation permettrait d'eclairer l'un par 1' autre" (27) en tant qu'ils sont tous deux "entremetteurs" entre le capital realisation de la valeur et le travailleur moyen de cette realisation (cf. 24-26). c'est, dans le cas du droit, poursuivent-ils , le passage incessant du suj et-de-droit a 1 'objet-de-droit du proprietaire (potentiel) a la propriete de soi-meme. ainsi 1' ideologic n'est pas "mensonge sur-ajoute au reel, mais mensonge de la realite elle-meme" (28) . et s'il faut aller plus loin, c'est a la reproduction qu'on s'adressera. en some, malgre une pretention d'eviter un mecanicisme(economiste) , les auteurs retrouvent une vieille "verite" essentialiste , celle de la "realite" sur l'ideologie, dans laquelle ils donnent a pleines pages. s'il est autorise, par la "nature des choses" (poulantzas, op „ cit.) de parler de droit bourgeois, qu'on ne lui enleve pas sa logique, sa "verite" interne. 18. hall et al 1978: chap. 2 et 7 particulierement . 92 bibliographie blanke.b., j. jurgens , h. kastendiek 1978 "on the current marxist discussion on the analysis of form and function of the bourgeois state." state and capital , holloway j., and s. picciotto, eds . london: arnold. code criminel 1978 s.r.c., 1970, chap. c-34, et lois connexes par l. saintonge-poitevin. montreal: wilson et la^leur. dujardin.p., j. michel 1978 "marx et la question du droit : raisons d'une approche et d'un detour. " pour une critique du droit : du juridique au politique , collec t i f . presses universitaires de grenoble et maspero. edelman, b 1973 le doit saisi par la photographie . paris : maspero . hall.s et al 1 _ 9"7s — policing the crisis: mugging, the state and law and order" london : macmillan . hirsch, j. 1978 "the state apparatus and social reproduction: elements of a theory of the bourgeois state." state and capital , holloway, j., s .• picciotto, eds . london: arnold. hirst, p.o. 1979 on law and ideology . atlantic highlands, new-jersey: humanities press jessop, b. 1980 "on recent marxist theories of law, the state, and juridico-political ideology." internatio nal journal of the sociology of law 8, 51 339-368. kinsey, j. 1979 "despotism and legality in national deviancy conference." capitalism and the rule of law . london: hutchinson. lim chin aik v queen 1963 1 all e.r. : 223-237 . long v state (delaware) 1949 65 a. (2d) 489, 5 terry 262. 93 miaille, m. 1976 miaille, m. 1978 pashukanis, e.b, 1978 poulantzas, n. 1965 poulantzas, n. 1978 pound, r. 1942 pound, r. 1959 r. v catholique 1980 r. v de marco 1973 r. v dry bones 1970 r. v howson 1966 r. v kester 1980 r. v maclean 1974 une introduction critique au droit paris : maspero . l'etat du droit paris : maspero . law and marxism: a general theory . edited and introduced by chris arthur , translated by b. einhorn. london: ink links nature des choses et droit . paris : pichon et durand auz i a s . l'etat, le pouvoir, le socialisms . paris: maspero. social control through law . new york: yale university press jurisprudence . st .paul (minn.) : west publishing c. 5. vol 49, c.c.c. (ad) 65-77. 13 c.c.c. (2d) 369, 22 c.r.n.s. 25! 3 c.c.c. (3d) 355, 9 d.l.r. (3d). 3 c.c.c. (3d) 348, 55 d.l.r. (2d) 582, 2 d.r. 63. 58 c.c.c. (2d) 219, 17 c.c.c. (2d) 84-107 r. v michelin tires manufacturing (canada) ltd, 1976 15 n.s.r. (2d) . r. v villeneuve 1968 1 c.c.c. (2d) 267, 2 c.r.n.s. 301 94 r. v r.w. woolworth co. ltd. 1974 18 c.c.c. (2d) 24 roper v tavlor's central garage (exeter) ltd. 1951 2 t.l.r. 284. sala-mol ins , l. 1977 la loi: de quel droit? paris : flammarion. schwartz-lieberman von wahlendorf, m.a. 1 9 " s les dimensions du droit . paris: lgdj. villey, m. 1968 la formation de la pensee juridique moderne paris : montchrestien . 1969 seize essais de philosophic du droit . paris: dalloz. vincent, j.m. 19"3 fetichisme et societe . paris: anthropos . socialism as a life-coherent society | 195 socialism as a life-coherent society jeff noonan1 all varieties of socialism share this trait in common: they are systematic alternatives to capitalism. but why should a systematic alternative to capitalism be necessary? has it not proven to be the most productive economic system in history? has it not created social conditions in which the powers of human imagination, creativity, and scientific understanding have grown to wider scope than in any previous society? has it not enabled human beings to extend their life span and live healthier and more active lives than ever before? has it not proven extraordinarily plastic, able to solve unforeseen problems in ways that its opponents continue to predict that it cannot, thus proving itself superior to any proposed alternative? these are difficult questions that anyone who claims that an alternative is necessary must take seriously. there is little use in denying that one part of honest answers to the foregoing questions is “yes.” no system has proven as productive, has enabled the development of imagination, creativity, and science to as wide a compass, cured more diseases, or proven as adaptable and protean as capitalism. however, since capitalism is not on trial here, but under analysis, more than yes or no answers are permitted. when more complex answers to the questions are proffered, the grounds supporting the need for a systematic alternative which builds upon the real achievements of capitalism become clear. notwithstanding those real achievements, an alternative is ultimately necessary because the social processes through which capitalism reproduces and develops itself are ecologically unsustainable and socially, politically, and culturally contradictory. at the root of capitalism’s unsustainable and contradictory nature is its ruling money-value system. the money-value system reduces the good 1  jeff noonan is professor and head of the department of philosophy at the university of windsor. he is the author of critical humanism and the politics of difference, democratic society and human needs, and materialist ethics and life-value (2012, forthcoming). he can be reached at: jnoonan@uwindsor.ca 196 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times across all dimensions of human life-activity to increasing the moneyvalue available for appropriation by private market agents, rendering the system blind to any harms that it imposes on natural life-support and social life-development systems which are not measurable in moneyvalue terms. beneath the apparent freedom of interest and activity enabled by capitalism lies a structure of social dependence upon possession of money-value for the satisfaction of life’s requirements. peering into this structure of dependence discloses the secret of capitalist unsustainability and contradiction: it systematically confuses life-value with money-value. life-value is that which is instrumentally or intrinsically good for living things. all life-requirement satisfiers, i.e., those resources, institutions, relationships, and practices that enable life to survive, reproduce, and develop, have instrumental life-value (mcmurtry, 1998, 164). the experiences and activities which living things are able to have and realise because life-requirements are satisfied are, in general, intrinsically lifevaluable, the substance of the good life. capitalism does indeed produce instrumental life-value and enable the expression of intrinsic life-value, but in systematically life-incoherent ways. rather than “consistently enabling ecological and human life together,” as a life-coherent society would, capitalism systematically degrades and depletes natural life-support systems at an accelerating pace, deprives those without the money to pay of the means of satisfying their natural and socio-cultural life-requirements, selects for expression and enjoyment only those experiences and activities which are money-valuable, and subjects even those experiences and activities to competitive zero sum games which ensures that the good of some people’s lives is sacrificed for the sake of the good of other people’s lives (mcmurtry, 2011, 4). a socialist alternative to capitalism is necessary because capitalism generates life-crises in the natural and socio-cultural dimensions of life-support and life-development. the warrant and value of this alternative is determined by the extent to which socialism proves capable of solving capitalist life-crises in life-coherent ways. as will become clear, conceiving socialism as a life-coherent society requires important revisions to prevailing interpretations of its traditional justificatory values. capitalist life-incoherence and traditional socialist values there is a large and growing body of socialist literature that focuses on the long-term unsustainability of capitalist society. the main conclusion of this literature is that capitalism is materially irrational because the expansion of money-value it demands contracts the natural system of life-support upon which its existence as a social system depends. as socialism as a life-coherent society | 197 meszaros argues, “the system is and must remain expansion oriented and driven by accumulation. naturally, what is at issue in this regard is not a process designed for ensuring the satisfaction of human need. rather, it is the expansion of capital as an end in itself, serving the preservation of a system which could not survive without consistently asserting its power as an extended mode of reproduction” (meszaros, 2008, 65). this system-need to expand money-capital is the driver of capitalist life-incoherence. the good of the system, ever expanding production of moneycapital, undermines, over the long term, the natural life-support system upon which the system itself depends. as kovel argues, “the [capitalist] imperative to expand continually erodes the edges of ecologies along an ever expanding perimeter, overwhelming or displacing recuperative efforts, and accelerating a cascade of destabilization” (kovel, 2007, p. 51, see also meszaros, 2008, p. 99-100, kovel and lowy, 2011). it is no good to rejoin to worries about long-term consequences that in the long term we are all dead, as keynes said, so that only short and medium term thinking in economics makes sense (keynes, 1924, p. 88). the rejoinder commits a fallacy of composition. it is true that every human individual exists for a fixed period of time, but it does not follow that the species faces the same limits. the species can reproduce itself indefinitely into the future. to the extent that economics focuses on the life of individuals as moments of the open-ended life of the species, long term, life-coherent thinking is required. however, the problem of life-incoherence has not always been recognised in the history of socialist thought. as lebowitz has recently noted, the history of socialism is riven by a tension between productvist and humanist interpretations. “rather than ... focus upon the full development of human potential, ... the dominant conception of socialism in the twentieth century tended to stress the development of the productive forces ... an important part of the socialist vision was lost—human beings at the centre” (lebowitz, 2010, 21). this tension was not invented by twentieth century socialists. it can be found in marx himself who understood the necessity of socialism as arising not from the long-term life-incoherence of capitalist productivity, but from the systematic blockage that capitalist relations of production imposed upon the ability of the productive forces to expand (marx, 1970, 21, marx and engels, 1975, 54-58). while it is true, as john bellamy foster has demonstrated, that marx did not ignore the natural foundations of human life but in fact understood labour as humanity’s metabolism with nature and criticised capitalism for imposing a “metabolic rift” between human beings 198 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times and their natural life-support system, it remains true that marx understood an essential element of socialism to be the unlocking of productive potential suppressed by capitalism (bellamy foster, 2000, p. 141-177). while the historical context in which marx wrote explains his belief that productive force expansion and socialism were essentially connected, in our changed circumstances the opposite relationship is demanded: socialism as a life-coherent society must end the hypertrophied growth of productive forces. if today the viability of the socialist project depends upon rejecting the traditional belief that socialism will be a society of unbounded productivity in favour of the suppressed alternative, socialism as a society with human needs and human capacities at the centre, we must ask in what human needs consist and to what extent and in what directions it is good to develop human capacities. if we start, as materialists must, from the natural basis of human life, then human needs originate in those non-optional physical-organic life-requirements without which biological life is impossible. so much is clear from marx in the german ideology (marx, 1975, p 37). but when we venture beyond the physical-organic bases of life the history of socialist thought loses sight of the essential connection between needs and the range of objective requirements of human life. despite marx’s understanding of real wealth as lying in human needs and capacities, he nowhere provides a criterion to distinguish between social needs which are not directly organic and consumer demands, and in some cases directly conflates needs and consumer demands. the most egregious example of this failure to rigorously distinguish real needs (objective natural and social life-requirements) from consumer demands occurs in wage labour and capital, where marx argues that a house which meets a person’s material need for shelter is enjoyed as such, so long as no one builds a bigger house next door. as soon as that happens, the owner of the smaller house now feels that his modest dwelling shows that “he has only very slight or no demands to make” (marx, 1973, p. 163). yet, this belief that one’s happiness as a human being depends upon ever higher levels of consumption, as opposed to the sufficient satisfaction of one’s real life-requirements, is just the psychology of consumer desire exploited by capitalist advertisers. as i have argued in more detail elsewhere, marx’s failure to define needs as real life-requirements blinds him to the life-destructive implications of the equation of happiness with rising levels of consumption (noonan, 2006, p. 121-130). socialism as a life-coherent society | 199 for the most part this elision has not been challenged by subsequent marxists. neither agnes heller nor ian fraser, who have provided the most detailed studies of marx’s conception of human needs, exposed this conflation of needs and consumer demands (heller, 1976; fraser, 1998). alan gilbert, who grounds his marxist theory of moral realism in human needs, likewise provides no explicit criterion by which objective human life-requirements can be rigorously distinguished from stimulated consumer demands (gilbert, 1982; gilbert, 1986). in the midst of ecological crisis today, this conceptual lacuna can no longer be accepted, as the failure to limit needs to what is universally required by human life to survive and socially develop impedes the formulation of a lifecoherent conception of socialism. sympathetic critics of my position might point to the work of marcuse or, more recently, the work of eco-socialists like joel kovel as having already filled in this lacuna. it is true that marcuse’s conception of “true” and “false” needs in one dimensional man implies that the differentia specifica of true needs is that they are objective life-requirements, but he does not state this criterion explicitly and he provides no systematic account of the limits of our needs (marcuse, 1964, p. 4-5). this failure to distinguish needs as life-requirements from consumer demands persists in the thought even of those socialists who have gone the furthest towards making the implicit life-coherence of the socialist alternative explicit. thus kovel contrasts the capitalist prioritisation of exchange value to the socialist alternative of prioritization of use-value, without noting the obvious, that there are life-destructive use-values that socialism ought not waste resources producing (kovel, 2007, p. 39). kovel does, it is true, argue that a socialist economy ought to produce only those use-values that satisfy human needs, but provides no criterion by which to distinguish need and consumer demand, and at one point conflates needs with advertising-induced addictions. “as capitalism penetrates life-worlds, it alters them in ways that foster its accumulation, chiefly by introducing a sense of dissatisfaction or lack...in this way, children develop such a craving for caffeine-laced sugar-loaded, or artificially sweetened soft drinks that it may be said that they positively need them” (kovel, 2007, p. 53). if one defines needs as life-requirements, then it can never be the case that our addictions are needs. life-requirements are not simply demands for use-values that we lack, they are our actual, positive connection to the natural field of life-support and the social field of lifedevelopment. as such they are our essential guide to the fundamentally practical question of what a life-coherent socialism must produce. if we 200 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times allow that consumer addictions are needs, then we use need in a purely descriptive sense, which then undermines the normative force of the difference between a life-requirement and consumer-demand. an analogous problem applies to the human potential or human capacities that socialism is supposed to better enable. lebowitz’ s most recent defence of socialism contends that “real wealth is the development of human capacities, the development of human potential.”(lebowitz, 2010, p. 43). stated in this unqualified way this position has no answer to the objection that capitalism has developed human potential and capacities better than any alternative, because it again lacks a criterion by which to distinguish life-valuable and life-disvaluable capacities and potentials. surely the capacities of human beings to instrumentally exploit nature have been developed under capitalism, and the potential to invent destructive weapons has been realized to an exquisite degree. are these the potentials and the capacities that lebowitz thinks socialism ought to better develop? clearly not. but when we ask “why not? we do not find the conceptual grounds for a principled answer, even though that answer is vital to explaining and defending the socialist alternative that lebowitiz is attempting to construct. the conceptual basis of that principled answer lies in the idea of life-value, to a more nuanced explanation of which i now turn. socialism, life-value, and life-coherence i noted in the introduction that life-values are either instrumental or intrinsic. instrumental life-values are defined by the range of life-requirements that a given organism must satisfy if it is to survive, develop, and express its vital capacities. human beings share with all other life-forms physical-organic requirements of survival, but our much richer cognitive, imaginative, and practical-creative capacities entail socio-cultural and temporal requirements for which we know of no real analogues in the rest of nature. the free expression and enjoyment of our capacities for social self-consciousness and intentional agency require definite forms of loving and caring interpersonal relationships, education, cultural spaces and institutions in which creative self and collective expression can be developed and enjoyed, political institutions in which collective rules of social life can be decided, opportunities for meaningful creation and contribution through productive work, and time experienced as an open matrix of possibilities for action. thus human beings share three sets of life-requirements corresponding to the three dimensions of human life: socialism as a life-coherent society | 201 physical-organic requirements of biological life, socio-cultural requirements of human life as a socially self-conscious agent, and temporal requirements of free human life. in all three cases we can apply a test to distinguish between resources, practices, relationships, and institutional structures which have instrumental life-value, and are therefore objective life-requirements, or needs, and consumer demands and preferences which may be desired, but are not life-requirements, and are therefore either of no life-value or negative life-value (life-destructive). in order to distinguish between life-requirements and consumer demands we must ask: if anyone were deprived of the given resource, relationship, practice, or institutional structure, would they suffer harm to any of their human capacities to experience the world through the senses, to feel the range of human emotions, to think and imagine, or act and create in life-valuable ways (mcmurtry, 2008, p. 164)? if deprivation causes objective harm in the form of loss of life or vital capacity, such as would ensue if one were deprived of all shelter in a cold climate, then the object, relationship, practice or institutional structure in question is a requirement of organic-social human life. if only subjective feelings of relative deprivation ensue, as in the case of marx’s man jealous of his neighbour’s house, then no life-requirement is involved, but only a consumer demand with no or negative life-value. let me give one example from each class of life-requirements to clarify my meaning. all of our sentient, cognitive, and imaginative capacities depend upon the functioning of our brains. without adequate protein, brain function is degraded, and thus so too the capacities to sense, think, and imagine. there is an objective relationship between protein intake and brain function such that objective harm in the form of degradation of the various capacities of the brain necessarily follows deprivation. it does not follow that there is only one way to satisfy this life-requirement for protein; the life requirement is not for any particular form of food but for any food that will satisfy the brain’s requirement for protein. analogous forms of harm are caused by the deprivation of socio-cultural life-requirements, although here the harm is not to the organic systems themselves but to the human forms of experience, thought, and activity they enable. adequately functioning eyes and brains can perfectly well sense the world, but it does not follow that they will see all that there is to experience. unless the person to whom the eyes and brain belong receives some degree of education and cultivation, it is quite possible for the person not to see the natural and humanly created beauty of the 202 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times world. as marx says, “the care burdened man in need has no sense for the finest play.”(marx, 1975a, p. 302). the human form of capacity expression emerges out of the biological organization of the human body, but is not reducible to it. well-functioning biological machines may be sociopathically indifferent to the others’ pain which they observe. healthy people may be illiterate, or live in social circumstances that prevent them from participating in political life, or be forced into mindless drudgery as their life’s work. in cases such as these there is no impairment of biological functioning but there certainly is harm to the human form of expression of our sentient, cognitive, imaginative, and creative capacities. i admit that verbal scepticism about socio-cultural life-requirements s possible, but that it would only prove practically convincing were the sceptic willing to deprive him or herself permanently of that which he or she claims is not a real life-requirement: loving and caring concern between people, education, political participation, intrinsically and instrumentally life-valuable and democratically governed work, and the experience of all natural and humanly created beauty. deprivation of the third class of life-requirement, the requirement of mortal beings for the experience of time as free, also causes objective harm, this time to our ability to express our life-capacities freely. by the expression “the experience of time as free” i do not mean the availability of “empty time,” time in which no external force compels us to do one thing rather than another (noonan, 2009, p. 377-393). some degree of empty time is a material condition of the experience of time as free, but the latter is not reducible to empty time. rather, it is essentially an experience of time as an open matrix of possibilities for life-valuable activity, in contrast to unfree time, the experience of time as an inescapable, externally imposed routine. as the human form of capacity expression develops out of our biological organism, so too their free realization grows out of their human form. freedom requires in addition to the satisfaction of biological and socio-cultural life-requirements some degree of free time in which the person can contemplate different possibilities for capacity expression and development and decide between them. there is thus a difference between a life rich in content of human capacity expression and a life in which this content is developed freely. someone trapped in the “rat race” of capitalism may express complex and challenging capacities in a particularly human way at work and yet feel oppressed rather than free. if money-value pressures cause these capacities to be expressed in routinized ways, then the capacities are not freely developed but coerced by the structure of work in which the person is trapped. socialism as a life-coherent society | 203 since human beings have only a finite life-span, they are harmed to the extent that their life-time is structured as a closed routine rather than an open matrix of possibilities for life-valuable activity. again, sceptical rejoinders are possible, but presuppose exactly what they deny. no one without the time to freely mull over the structure and implications of philosophical arguments makes sceptical rejoinders. hence i conclude that these three-dimensions of human life-requirement are objectively real, the material foundation of any humanly possible good life, and that anyone is harmed to the extent that they are deprived of one or more of them. capitalism is systematically harmful to people because: it degrades the natural field of life-support upon which our biological organism depends and makes the satisfaction of natural, socio-cultural, and temporal life-requirements contingent on their serving the master capitalist goal of money-value accumulation. in thus making life-requirement satisfaction contingent on the ability to pay, capitalism treats life-requirements as instruments for the expansion of money-value rather than instruments of the creation of intrinsic life-value. it thus reduces social institutions to structures of exploitation rather than life-requirement satisfaction and free life-capacity realization. finally, capitalism reifies time such that it is experienced as an oppressive structure in which human activity is systematically routinized in the service of external powers. if socialism is the solution for these harms then it must solve these problems in a life-coherent manner. what would such a solution entail? as i noted in the introductory comments, life-coherence requires enabling ecological and human life together. it might seem that the simultaneous satisfaction of these twin demands is impossible, that the good life for humans requires more and more things, such that human life can only be enabled if ecological life is damaged. in fact, the accumulation of things beyond life-requirements does not make life any better, because life is essentially creative activity, and most consumer goods are passivity-inducing, which is why shopping for them tends to be more enjoyable than possessing them (kasser, 2002, p. 85-86). thin a social activity it may be, but shopping is nevertheless a social activity. once the new gadget has been brought home, boredom with it soon ensues. the life-requirements set out above are the natural, social, and temporal conditions for the widest possible life-coherent expression of human capacities. since their satisfaction can be achieved without much of what advertisers tell us are necessities but which in reality have no committed life-function in any dimension of being humanly alive, socialist 204 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times production can enable human and ecological life together by progressively reducing the energy and resources devoted to the production of life-disvaluable commodities. as it is the wealthy societies of the global north that waste the most energy and resources in the consumption of commodities which contribute nothing to life-maintenance, development, or enjoyment, the shift in priorities of production would, while reducing the overall ecological impact of human economies, make more resources available for life-development of the global south, and still enable more active and enjoyable lives in the global north. in this way, socialism as a life-coherent society can enable human and ecological life together by limiting the output of production to that which is required by our organism and to fund the institutions, relationships and free time required to freely cultivate our capacities. to put this point another way, minimizing the energy and resources it takes to produce instrumental life-value is the condition for the maximization of intrinsic life-value over the open-ended future of the human species. intrinsic life-value, recall, is the enjoyed, life-coherent expression of freely realized life-capacities. capitalism is life incoherent in relation to the expression and enjoyment of human capacities because its ruling value system does not valorise the universal and comprehensive satisfaction of life-requirements. thus the lives of most people are dependent upon finding paid work, which in turn is not organized so as to enable the comprehensive expression and enjoyment of the fullrange of life-capacities, but to maximise profits for the firm which purchases the labour-power through which the capacities are expressed. life-capacities may be developed, but not as intrinsic life-values, but as exploitable inputs to the production of money-value. even where human capacities are developed in rich and complex ways, the ends they serve are often life-destructive. and even where the ends they serve are not life-destructive, the distribution of positions is not according to talent and aptitude, but limited by the demands of profitability, which means that people who are willing and able to contribute their talents and aptitudes to life-valuable social tasks cannot find work. traditionally, socialism has encapsulated its solution to these structural impediments to the free expression and enjoyment of capacities in slogans like “from each according to their abilities, to each according their needs” (marx, 1978, p. 531). but just as in the case of needs, which have not been consistently and coherently defined in terms of the three classes of life-requirements, so too has the question of the limits of life-valuable socialism as a life-coherent society | 205 capacity development been left unaddressed. instead of systematic interrogation of these limits we too often find socialism identified with the transcendence of all limits. lebowitz quotes marx with approval for his claim that socialism will develop “all human powers as such as ends in themselves,” without noting the obvious problem, all too clear from the history of capitalist industry, that the set of all human powers includes life-destructive powers. clearly marx and lebowitz do not mean to affirm the power to destroy, but by not tying down the human powers whose development they affirm to the required life-coherence limitation, they open themselves to objections of this sort. such critiques are not only abstract philosophical objections but also political, as in environmentalist critiques of socialism as ecologically destructive or radical feminist critiques of marxism as still rooted in masculinist psychologies of violence and conquest.(benton, 1989, p. 51-86; wittig, 1997, p. 224-225). to obviate these objections and to build political links to those who lodge them it must be made clear the ways in which the principle of life-coherence would govern the development of human capacities in a future socialist society. just as it is not the case that every use-value has instrumental life-value, so too not every expression of human capacities has intrinsic life-value. absolute intrinsic life-value attaches only to the raw capacities to sense, feel, think, imagine, and act. definite constellations of these raw capacities in concrete expressions are subject to evaluation according to the principle of life-coherence. this principle rules out forms of capacity expression which: (1) permanently degrade the natural life-support system or destroy non-human life for no higher, long-term life-serving purpose; and (2) depend necessarily on the exploitation of others’ life-requirements, such that the exploited other is prevented from expressing and enjoying his or her life-capacities as a necessary consequence of the structure of exploitation within which he or she lives. the normal expression of life-capacities under capitalism violates both of these limitations. the extent of their development is limited not by the principle of life-coherence but by the degree to which the development of any given capacity is money-valuable. even where ecodestruction is avoided, the development and expression of life-capacities cannot escape the structures of exploitative work and oppressive sociocultural institutions and ideologies that dominate life in activity in capitalist society. the life-coherent solution to these systematic problems is to create the social conditions in which human capacities are expressed and enjoyed only in those forms that enable ecological and human life 206 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times together. if that which is intrinsically valuable in its effects destroys the natural and social life-support and life-development systems upon which its very existence depends, then this conception of intrinsic value must be materially irrational. if socialism is to solve the problems of capitalism and secure the comprehensive conditions for everyone to enjoy their lives through making valuable contributions to the natural and social worlds, it must take care to specify clearly the limits that lifesupport systems and the shared life-interests of other people impose on individual goals and projects. analogous limits must govern the forms of political struggle through which socialism can be progressively built. to an explanation and defence of a life-coherent political practice i now turn in conclusion. life-coherence and political practice as lebowitz rightly argues, new societies do not “drop from the sky” or emerge “pristine and complete from the conceptions of intellectuals,” but rather “emerge within and in opposition to the existing society” (lebowitz, 2006, p. 62). his point, as i interpret it, is that the task of building socialism is not like constructing a new building from blueprints, but like an on-going project of renovating an existing building piece by piece until a different building sits on the same foundations. as he argues in relation to the emergence in venezuela of new neighbourhood-based democratic councils and workers’ co-management of enterprises, “the emergence of both these new elements is a process—a process of learning and a process of development.”(lebowitz, 2006, p. 112). they are elements of a socialist alternative developing within an existing capitalist society. building socialism is thus not a process that awaits a revolutionary break with capitalism but is itself that break which emerges within and in tension and struggle with the prevailing capitalist institutions. some socialists might vociferously object to the implications of the metaphor by noting that it claims that a new society can be built upon on the same foundations as the old. the objection can be met by pointing out that all societies have the same material foundations: the natural life-support system and human labour as “metabolic interchange” with it. nevertheless, it is true that the metaphor is meant to emphasise more than is usual the continuities that link present capitalist society to a future socialist society. socialists have paid most attention, for obvious reasons, to questions about how best to bring about fundamental social transformation: can it be achieved through reforms, or is revolution necessary? if revolution is necessary, what does revolusocialism as a life-coherent society | 207 tion mean? can it be the spontaneous product of workers’ self-activity, or does it require a vanguard party? what ought the relationship be between workers and the party, or between workers as a class and other oppressed groups whose members belong to different classes? these questions define in large part the political history of different socialist movements, and i will have something to say, in general, about them at the end. to begin, however, i want to say something about what would remain continuous between socialist and capitalist society, not for the sake of novelty, but because i think that the principle of life-coherence sheds light on this under-examined issue in a way that has important practical implications for rebuilding a democratic socialist movement. capitalism is able to reproduce itself in the short and medium term despite the manifold economic, political, social, and environmental crises it regularly generates because people believe themselves to be ultimately dependent upon access to its labour and commodity markets for their survival and development. although the ultimate foundations of human life are not markets and commodities, but natural resources and human labour, this belief is not completely mistaken. it is supported by the fact that in capitalist social reality money is required to exchange for the commodities that one’s life and development requires. so long as the belief persists that capitalist labour and commodity markets are the ultimate foundations of life and development it will appear to all who hold this belief that any attack on the existing society is an attack on the very foundations of life and life-development. by this claim i do not mean that people never fight back unless they believe that a completely different world is possible, but rather that they fight back in self-limiting ways because they cannot see any real possibility for successfully building a fundamentally different society. to take a recent case as illustration of the meaning of my claim, in june 2011 postal workers went on strike against canada post. fearing back to work legislation, they decided to engage in rotating strikes rather than an all-out nation-wide strike. in response, canada post locked them out and the conservative government then passed back to work legislation. yet, the strategy, though it ultimately proved self-undermining, is understandable, not simply as conservatism on the part of the union leadership, but as rooted in genuine fear of the consequences of all-out challenges to capitalist power in an era where a systematic alternative seems remote. as albo, gindin, and panitch argue, capitalism has consistently “compelled workers to become more dependent on the market as individuals so as to limit their ability to contest the social relations 208 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times of the capitalist market as a class” (albo, gindin, and pantich, 2010, p. 90). from the standpoint of anyone enmeshed in the daily struggle to make money in order to survive, talk of total social transformation does not sound utopian, but suicidal. hence oppositional politics, especially in wealthy societies, remains limited to promises of piecemeal reform that do not upset “the markets” for fear of compromising money-value growth upon which life and life-development appear to depend. systemic causes are never addressed, and society lurches from one crisis to the next. this fear cannot be overcome by talk of “smashing” and “destroying” capitalism that sometimes tempt socialists because people for the most part do not believe that it can be smashed or destroyed. in order to build movements broad-based and powerful enough to solve the causes of life-crises, socialists might do better to emphasise the natural and institutional continuity between capitalism and socialism. by ‘natural and institutional continuity’ i refer to the natural system of life-support that underlies any human society and supplies all the physical-organic requirements of life, and existing social institutions, relationships, and practices in so far as they actually fulfill their life-coherent function: enabling the development of human capacities through the satisfaction of life-requirements. the point of emphasising natural and institutional continuity is not to attenuate the essential opposition between capitalism and socialism, but rather to bring to light the longer and deeper history of collective labour and struggle through which social institutions have been built up from their natural bases and progressively turned from support of the particular interests of ruling classes towards universal provision of life-requirements across the three dimensions of human life. if we ground the struggle for socialism in those aspects of existing institutions which actually serve the shared life-interest, stressing always the role that struggle has played historically in extending this life-service, then the task of building socialism no longer appears as a suicidal destruction of existing means of life-support, but an organic development beyond the achieved plateaus of life-requirement satisfaction found in actually existing civil commons institutions and practices. the civil commons is mcmurtry’s term for all non-commodified social goods which enable human life to freely develop (mcmurtry, 2002, p. 117). these institutions and practices range from languages and love for children through to free education, health care, and the democratic principle that all who are subject to institutions ought to play an active role in their governance. the universality of life-requirement provision socialism as a life-coherent society | 209 that defines the civil commons contrast with privacy of monetary benefit that defines the system-value that governs institutions today. all social institutions are marked by this contradiction. people love their children, but often express this love by buying them things which they in no sense require and which contribute to inculcating the habitual equation of enjoyment with the purchase of commodities. publically funded health care in canada is a civil commons institution, but it is continually eroded at the margins by the commodified medical industry. education is a public civil commons good, but at the post-secondary level it is becoming increasingly commodified and bent to the purposes of private industry. existing political institutions are formally democratic, but determined by the master purpose of protecting the existing structure of power and ruling value system, and thus not coherently anchored in protection and satisfaction of the shared life-interest. my contention is that socialism indeed does not drop from the sky but finds its organic basis in the achieved level of civil commons development. motivating people in the struggle for socialism is thus not a task, which even socialists sometimes present it as being, of winning people to an alien ideology, but disclosing how socialist values are already embodied in the civil commons function of existing institutions which people already support, and whose erosion they lament, if not always actively resist. the politically relevant contradiction, the one that socialists ought to focus people’s attention on, is between the goodness of the civil commons function of these institutions, and the ways in which this actually existing goodness is negated to the extent that private money-value interests seize control. let me illustrate my claim through the paradigmatic example of canadian public health care. the principle if not the complete practice of public medicine in canada is “to each according to her or his need.” people might debate the cogency of this principle in the abstract, but as concretely applied to medical care, the majority of canadians consistently defend it. more importantly, by any metric one cares to choose: cost effectiveness, health outcomes, or equity of access it is demonstrably superior to commodified medicine (armstrong, armstrong, bourgeault, choniere, lexchin, mykhalovsky, peters, and white, 2004, p. 13-38). thus public medical care is a real life, if partial and imperfect, realization of the socialist principle of distribution. when it is attacked, people mobilise to defend it. what they defend it from is the core distributive principle of capitalism: to each according to his or her ability to pay, regardless of his or her own or others’ need. yet, proponents of public medical care rarely 210 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times equate it with the demonstrably superior outcomes of the socialist principle of distribution that underlies it. “socialism” is most often only mentioned by opponents who castigate it as such. defenders typically bend over backwards trying to distance their defence of public medical care from socialism, and marxists too often treat it as nothing more than a “reform” within capitalism. but this response misses a crucial opportunity to link socialism with a practice that enjoys majority support and actually works. of course it is true that a means of health care delivery is not a whole society. my point is not to claim that advanced capitalism is implicitly socialist. nor i am not arguing that the path towards socialism can be advanced by what erik olin wright calls “symbiotic” forms of social transformation (wright, 2010, p. 337-365). symbiotic forms of social transformation are processes of social change which achieve real reform for workers and other subordinate groups while at the same time solve certain problems for capitalists. universal suffrage is an example: it solved the problem of containing radical opposition to capitalism while also enabling workers to gain and use political power to advance certain other economic goals. although real reform is possible through such strategies, fundamental social change is not. eventually the logic of the existing system is going to put a stop to the evolving counter-logic of the alternative. my point is thus not that radical change can be achieved by progressive reforms extended over an open ended time frame, but rather that past social struggles have created civil commons institutions which demonstrably function according to socialist principles. this point can become the centre of political education for mass mobilization– another world is possible because elements of it are actual, and have been made so through successful struggles. the fact that these institutions work better than market alternatives provides an organic basis for socialist politics. by “organic” i mean actually existing and functioning in the present as means of life-requirement satisfaction. organic is to be contrasted with “theoretical,” i.e., abstract arguments that claim to prove that a systematic socialist alternative to capitalism is possible, but whose plausibility depends entirely upon the internal logical cogency of argument. in other words, the term is meant to stress that the struggle for socialism occurs along an historical continuum of building up civil commons institutions whose real value is the universal enabling of life-coherent capacities through comprehensive satisfaction of life-requirements. by arguing from the achieved level of civil commons development, and socialism as a life-coherent society | 211 demonstrating how this development demands collective as opposed to private appropriation of social wealth, socialists can refute the capitalist critique of socialism by embracing it. all that socialists need as an effective rejoinder is to say: yes it is socialist, and look, it actually works. conceiving of socialism as an organic development out struggles oriented by the universal goal of comprehensive satisfaction of life requirements takes us beyond sterile debates about reform or revolution. the real problem is not constructing an abstract proof that capitalism is or is not reformable, but securing public control over life-sustaining and lifedeveloping resources and institutions, and using them in life-coherent ways. the practicability of this task is proven by the existing level of civil commons development. the task of building socialism is thus a task of extending existing civil commons practices into the core economic and political systems of capitalist society. to conclude i will examine whether or not there are any existing practices which can serve as an organic basis from which to build struggles capable of transforming these core systems. it is a well-known objection to capitalist democracy that it is at best incomplete because it does not extend into economic institutions (see for example meiksins wood, 1995). one of the great achievements in the history of socialist struggle is the development of workers’ councils, novel political institutions through which the coercive economic power exercised by money-value and management as its servant over workers can be overcome. in the experience of the contemporary working class in north america and europe there appear to be no analogues of workers councils. hence the demand for workers councils would sound exactly like a demand “dropping from the sky” and be unlikely to mobilise significant numbers of people. while there are no existing analogues of institutions like workers’ councils in contemporary western capitalism, there is a civil commons institution which embodies the principle of workplace democracy. that institution is the trade union understood as a forum in which workers debate together about how best to structure their conditions of work. like other civil commons institutions under capitalism unions are imperfect expressions of the democratic principle of workers control of production because unions presuppose management as a bargaining opponent and the money-value system as the object of bargaining. nevertheless, unions are an organic basis for socialist arguments in favour of the more comprehensive democratization of work life because, when they are functioning well, they draw workers out of self-enclosed con212 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times cern for doing their job and getting paid into political debates about how work life ought to be governed and what its universal social significance is. without minimizing any of the challenges facing unions or the limitations of their current mode of operation, it remains true to say, as hilary wainwright recently has, that “unions are, in many countries, the largest, the best resourced, most stable, most institutional, and in some respects to most rooted ... movements in civil society...unions can facilitate the organization of knowledge, practical actions, expert research, and popular expression of the mass of people to defend social needs and the means of meeting them” (wainwright, 2011, p. 3). consciously turned in the direction of contesting the authority of management at work and the rule of money-value over life-requirement satisfaction, unions could function as the organic foundation for deeper struggles for the democratization, i.e., the rule of the common life-interest within, economic life generally. but is not the principle of the rule of the common life-interest the deepest justification of existing democratic institutions? the very first value affirmed by the american declaration of independence, for example, is “life.” yet we know through observation that it is not the value of life that actually rules, but the power of money. nevertheless, existing democratic institutions cannot openly reject the principle that they are designed to allow people to govern themselves in the shared life-interest, for to break openly with it would be to compromise the deepest legitimating value of liberal-democratic capitalism: freedom. thus the political institutions of existing liberal-democratic capitalism also provide an organic basis for the comprehensive life-coherent democratic institutions that socialism would require. marx himself argued that the working class must win the battle of democracy (marx and engles, 1986, p. 53; see also nimtz, 2000). today i believe that struggles need to be organized around gaining political control of existing political institutions and using them for life-valuable ends. the age of revolutionary vanguardism and the “noah complex” (the belief that nothing new can be built until the old world has been washed away) has passed (collier, 2009, p. 98). while certainly far from perfect, the examples of venezuela and bolivia provide evidence that existing parliamentary institutions need not be instruments of class power, but can be transformed from institutions of class rule to institutions of genuine lifecoherent democracy. the history of revolutionary vanguardism proves that the violent conquest of the existing ruling class does socialism as a life-coherent society | 213 not at all entail success in building a life-coherent society. the construction of a life-coherent alternative does not so much depend upon single-minded devotion to the cause—always a mindset that carries with it profound dangers—as it does learning to distinguish in every case between the life-value of a given institution and the system-value that prevents the full expression of that life-value. radical political practice today depends not so much on the invention of new institutions as the fuller realization of the life-value of the existing institution. in the case of existing political institutions the life-value is that their legitimacy enables ruling parties to use state power to implement their agenda. if this agenda is a comprehensive program of life-coherent social transformation, then its democratic legitimacy cannot be coherently contested by opponents. if its democratic legitimacy cannot be contested, then the only way in which it can be attacked is for opponents to drop all pretence to democracy and violently assert their particular interests against the universal life-interest. in doing so they deprive themselves of the legitimacy references: albo, greg, gindin, sam, and panitch, leo. (2010). in and out of crisis. oakland, ca: pm press. armstrong, pat, armstrong, hugh, bourgeault, ivy lynn, choniere, jacqueline, lexchin, joel, mykhalovsky, eric, peters, suzanne, and white, jerry. (2004). amarket principle, business practices, and health care: comparing the u.s. and canadian experiences,@ international journal of canadian studies, no. 28, (fall, 2004), 13-38. bellamy foster, john. (2000). marx’s ecology. new york: monthly review press. benton, ted. (1989). “marxism and natural limits,” new left review, no. 178, (nov.dec. 1989, 51-86. collier, andrew. (2009). “marx and conservatism,” karl marx and contemporary philosophy, andrew chitty and martin mcivor, eds. london: palgrave macmillan. fraser, ian. (1998). hegel and marx: the concept of need. edinburgh: university of edinburgh press. gilbert, alan. (1982). “an ambiguity in marx and engel’s account of justice and equality,” american political science review. vol. 76, no. 2 (june, 1982). 328-346. gilbert, alan. (1986). “moral realism, individuality, and justice in war,” political theory. vol. 14, no. 1 (february 1986). 105-135. 214 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times heller, agnes. (1976). the theory of need in marx. new york: st. martin’s press. kasser, tim. (2002). the high price of materialism. cambridge ma: mit press. keynes, john maynard. (1924). atract on monetary reform. new york: harcourt brace. kovel, joel. (2007). the enemy of nature. new york: zed books. kovel, joel, and lowy, michael lowy. (2011). an ecosocialist manifesto (http://www.ecosocialistnetwork.org/docs/ecomanifesto.htm (accessed, february 28th, 2011). lebowitz, michael. (2006). build it now. new york: monthly review press. lebowitz, michael. (2010). the socialist alternative: real human development. new york: monthly review press. marcuse, herbert. (1964). one dimensional man. boston: beacon press. marx, karl. (1970). a contribution to the critique of political economy. moscow: progress publishers. marx, karl. (1973). “wage labour and capital,” marx and engels, selected works, volume 1. moscow: progress publishers. marx, karl, and engels, friedrich. (1975). the german ideology. moscow: progress publishers. marx, karl. (1975a). “economic and philosophical manuscripts of 1844,” karl marx and friedrich engels, collected works, volume 3. new york: international publishers. marx, karl. (1978). “critique of the gotha program,” the marx-engels reader . robert c. tucker, ed. new york: w.w. norton, 525-541. marx, karl, and engels, friedrich. (1986). the communist manifesto. moscow: progress publishers. meiksins wood, ellen. (1995). democracy against capitalism. new york: cambridge university press. mcmurtry, john. (1998). unequal freedoms. toronto: garamond).. mcmurtry, john. (2002). value wars. london: pluto press. mcmurtry, john. (2011). “human rights v. corporate rights: understanding life-value, the civil commons, and social justice.” studies in social justice, vol.5, no. 1 (summer, 2011). 1-38. meszaros, istvan. (2008). the challenge and burden of historical time . new york: monthly review press. nimtz, august h. (2000). marx and engles: their contribution to the democratic breakthrough. albany ny: state university of new york press. socialism as a life-coherent society | 215 noonan, jeff. (2006). democratic society and human needs. montreal: mcgill queen’s university press. noonan, jeff. (2009). “free time as a condition of a free human life,” contemporary political theory, vol. 8, no. 4, 377-393. wainwright, hilary. (2011). “a new trade unionism in the making?” the bullet. no. 488. www.socialistproject.ca/bullet/488.php (accessed april 8th, 2011). wittig, monique. (1997). “one is not born woman,” feminisms. susan kemp and judith squires, eds. oxford: oxford university press, 220226. wright, erik olin. (2010). envisaging real utopias. london: verso. 216 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times the myth of canadian exceptionalism | 19 the myth of canadian exceptionalism: crisis, non-recovery, and austerity —jim stanford1 since the onset of the global financial crisis and resulting worldwide recession in 2008, canadian political leaders have consistently boasted (to both domestic and international audiences) about canada’s supposedly superior record in avoiding the worst effects of that crisis, and then quickly repairing the damage and getting back to previous trajectories of growth and prosperity.2 indeed, at first federal leaders (led by finance minister jim flaherty) even denied that canada would be caught in the global conflagration at all – illustrated most strikingly by mr. flaherty’s ill-fated fiscal update of october 2008, which denied the existence of a recession which in fact had already hit the country (department of finance, 2008).3 once it became obvious that this could not be true, the government changed tack, and – in cooperation with other countries, as agreed at the g20’s emergency summit meeting in washington in november 2008 – launched a powerful but temporary series of emergency fiscal, monetary, and financial measures. the recession that then hit canada was quick and sharp, but shortlived (by technical economic definitions, anyway): real gross domestic product (gdp) bottomed out in july 2009 and began to grow again. by the autumn of 2010 real gdp had regained its pre-recession peak (reached two years earlier). a few months later (by january 2011), total employment also regained its pre-recession peak, and the government crowed that the damage from the recession had thus been fully repaired. political 1 jim stanford is an economist with the canadian auto workers. he can be reached at stanford@caw.ca. the author acknowledges very helpful comments on an earlier draft from stephen mcbride. 2 this work extends and updates previous research by the author. see stanford, 2012; 2012b. 3 the glaring sense of denial which infused that document sparked the subsequent political crisis during which the opposition parties united to vote non-confidence in the minority conservative government, followed by the prorogation of parliament by the governorgeneral. 20 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism figures naturally credited their own economic management for this purported recovery – including, variously, tax cuts (implemented before and during the recession), canada’s relatively lower public debt, the emergency fiscal and financial measures taken during the crisis, and canada’s more stringent banking regulations. economic conditions may be suboptimal, it was acknowledged, but canadians should be grateful that the country survived the crisis so much better than the rest of the world. this argument was a potent weapon in the conservatives’ successful campaign to win a majority mandate in the election of spring 2011. the traditional “rule of thumb” of economists in canada is that a recession occurs when real gdp declines for two consecutive quarters, and a “recovery” commences when real gdp begins to expand again. by this definition, the recession lasted for three quarters beginning in the autumn of 2008, and recovery began in the summer of 2009. real gdp has continued to edge ahead (albeit unspectacularly and unsteadily), employment has increased (also fitfully), and the economy seems headed in a forward direction. so has the canadian economy indeed been “exceptional” in how the crisis was experienced and managed here? it turns out that both components of the government’s dual boast – that canada fared much better than other countries, and that the damage from the recession has already been repaired – are false. and both claims founder on the same underlying empirical fact: canada’s population grows over time, and relatively quickly. trends in absolute levels of output and employment need to be considered in the context of that population growth. on average over the last five years, canada’s total population has increased by about 1.2 percent per year. the working age population (aged 15 years and over, by canadian statistical definitions) has been growing slightly faster than that: about 1.3 percent per year. with a growing population, therefore, the economy must continuously generate new employment opportunities, and new output and income, simply to support a constant standard of living and a steady degree of labour market utilization. comparisons of the total number of jobs, or the total volume of output, over time require adjustments for this ongoing expansion in the canadian population. in fact, canada’s population growth is among the fastest in the industrialized world. canada’s population growth rate is faster than any other g7 economy (including the u.s.), faster than mexico’s, and nearly twice the organization for economic cooperation and development (oecd) average. strong population growth generates a certain underlying economic momentum (since growing population naturally stimulates underlying growth in consumer spending and other variables). but it also sets the myth of canadian exceptionalism | 21 a higher “bar” in order to maintain a steady-state economic standard: the canadian economy must generate hundreds of thousands of new jobs each year, and tens of billions of dollars in new gdp, just to maintain existing economic and labour market conditions. when canadian officials boast that the pace of job-creation or gdp growth is relatively high compared to other countries, they neglect to mention that canada’s economy must generate more growth and jobs, just to stand still. other industrialized countries (like japan or germany), where population is stagnant or even declining, do not need to generate such significant annual expansion in order to protect existing benchmarks. similarly, when political leaders claim that the absolute level of employment or production has regained and surpassed pre-recession peaks, they neglect to consider the impact of ongoing population growth in the several years since those pre-recession peaks were reached. any comparisons of economic and employment performance, therefore, whether over time or across countries, must take account of the impact of population growth on measures of utilization or prosperity. once those adjustments are made, then the tone of self-congratulation which typifies so many official pronouncements on canada’s recent economic performance is shown to be thoroughly unjustified. this paper will consider in turn the twin claims made by canadian political leaders: namely, that the damage done by the recession to the canadian economy and labour market has now been repaired, and that canada did much better than other industrialized countries in traversing the difficult economic conditions of the last few years. section i indicates that after adjusting for population growth, the recovery in neither gdp nor employment since the recession has yet to recoup the ground lost during the 2008-09 downturn. in the labour market, in particular, the pace of employment-creation has lagged far behind the pace of population growth. after adjusting for population growth, just one-fifth of the damage done by the recession had been repaired by mid-2012 – fully three years after the official onset of the recovery. moreover, this key labour market indicator has not improved since the spring of 2010, highlighting the stalling of the canadian recovery since that time. as discussed in section ii, canada’s international economic reputation similarly loses considerable lustre when the data are adjusted for canada’s faster-than-average population growth. in per capita terms, the change in canada’s real gdp since 2007 ranks an uninspiring 16th among the 34 countries of the oecd. similarly, after adjusting for growth in the working age population, canada’s employment performance has been equally middling: once again ranking 17th (out of 33 22 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism reporting countries) in terms of the change in the employment rate since 2007. if there is one word to summarize canada’s economic standing among its industrialized peers, it should be “mediocre.” section iii provides further comment on another factor that has been suggested as contributing to canada’s economic performance during and after the global financial crisis: the relative stability of the canadian banking system. while canadian financial markets experienced significant stress during the worst moments of the global crisis, no canadian banks failed, and credit conditions did not experience the same degree of contraction as in u.s. and european markets. this relative stability certainly constituted a canadian “advantage” in recent years. the reasons for this stability are considered, with special emphasis on the role of powerful stabilizing state interventions – both long-standing policies and regulations, and emergency measures implemented during the crisis. the exceptionalist claim that canadian banks were somehow inherently immune from the global meltdown is refuted; the success of the canadian financial system in traversing the global meltdown reflects state policy, not any embedded advantages of canadian banks. part i: historical comparisons canada’s economy (measured by real output) began to shrink in the third quarter of 2008, and declined close to 4 percent by summer 2009, when the official recession ended and real gdp began to recover. in per capita terms, however, the downturn began somewhat earlier: at the beginning of 2008, when slowing economic expansion began to lag behind ongoing population growth. real per capita gdp then fell by over 5 percent by summer 2009. the decline in the per capita measure was worse than the fall in total gdp, because of the impact of ongoing population growth that continued even as the economy was in recession. as indicated in figure 1, real per capita gdp has improved fairly steadily but slowly since mid-2009, with the exception of the second quarter of 2011 when total gdp (and, of course, per capita gdp) declined. however, those 9 quarters (over two years) of economic progress have repaired only about 70 percent of the reduction in real per capita gdp that occurred during the downturn. real per capita gdp remains 1.4 percent lower as of the third quarter of 2011, than it was at the beginning of 2008. in fact, real per capita gdp is still lower in canada than it was at the beginning of 2006 (when the harper conservative government first took power); during almost six years of conservative “stewardship,” therefore, canadians have experienced no economic progress (by this measure) whatsoever. the myth of canadian exceptionalism | 23 put differently, real gdp declined by some $2,100 per canadian (measured in 2002 dollar terms) during the 9 months of the official recession. the subsequent 27 months of recovery recouped some $1,500 of that loss, leaving gdp per person $600 lower than before the recession. of course, trends in average real gdp per capita are not an adequate portrayal of actual living standards of the majority of canadians anyway, for several well-known reasons. average gdp per capita takes no account of the distribution of income, so at a time of growing income polarization, the average measure is an increasingly misleading indicator of the actual material standards experienced by the growing share of marginalized canadians. and many components of gdp (including corporate profits, depreciation, and others) are never fully reflected in individual incomes or living standards. for this reason, the decline in average real per capita personal incomes has been slightly worse than the decline in real per capita gdp. in fact, the lasting damage from the recession is considerably worse than that. it is normal for an economy to demonstrate rising real per capita output over time, as a result of technological improvements and productivity growth. the pre-recession trend in canada was for real per capita gdp to increase by around 1.5 percent per year (reflecting capital accumulation, productivity growth, and innovation). trend potential output has continued to grow during the years of recession and subsequent slow recovery (as indicated in figure 1). relative to that potential,4 current real per capita gdp (of about $39,400 per person, in 2002 dollar terms) is at least 6 percent (or $3,000) below the level it would have reached if the prerecession trend had been sustained. in this regard, the fact that canada’s economy continues to operate well below its productive potential costs each canadian thousands of dollars in foregone income each year. and the modest rebound in real per capita gdp experienced since summer 2009 has not been strong enough to begin to close that gap with potential output that was opened up during the recession. this is different from most previous recoveries, which featured periods of above-trend growth which allowed the economy to catch up to potential output.5 4 the canadian economy was not fully-employed even before the crisis and recession hit in 2008, so even that pre-recession trend does not capture the true full-employment potential of the economy. 5 for example, as canada exited the painful recession of 1981-82, real gdp began to grow at an annual average rate of 5.6 percent during the first three years after the trough of the recession –more than twice as fast as the average gdp growth experienced in the first three years of the present recovery (author’s calculations from statistics canada cansim table 380-0002). the recovery after the 1990s recession, however, was also initially halting and uncertain; only by the last five years of that decade was the economy growing at a fast enough clip (almost 5 percent on an average annual basis) to absorb excess capacity still being carried from the 1990-91 recession. 24 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism adjusting employment statistics for population growth results in an even starker comparison to pre-recession benchmarks. because the potential labour force (represented by the working age population) grows by some 1.3 percent (or around 350,000 canadians) each year, it is not enough for the canadian economy to simply create new jobs. it must produce enough new jobs to keep up with ongoing population growth; in fact, during a recovery job creation must be even faster, in order to repair the damage done by the recession (as well as offsetting ongoing population growth). the best statistic for comparing the pace of job creation with ongoing population growth is the employment rate, which is the ratio of total employment to the working age population. especially during periods of sustained labour market slackness, the employment rate is a more appropriate indicator of labour market well-being than the unemployment rate; in particular, it is unaffected by factors such as the decline in formal labour force participation which results when discouraged workers simply give up looking for work.6 falling labour force participation reduces the unemployment rate, making it seem like the labour market is strengthening, when in fact discouraged workers are simply throwing in the towel. in this context, the employment rate provides a more accurate reading on labour market conditions than the unemployment rate. like real per capita gdp, canada’s employment rate peaked some months before the official onset of recession. the employment rate peaked at 63.8 percent of the working age population in february 2008, after which point the decelerating pace of job creation no longer kept up with ongoing population growth. during the next 17 frightening months, the employment rate plunged by 2.5 percentage points, reaching a trough of 61.3 percent of the working age population in july 2009. that represented the fastest decline in the employment rate of any recession since the 1930s. the subsequent bottoming and recovery of real output in canada has hardly recouped any of this sharp downturn. from july 2009 through mid-2010, the employment rate recovered by about one-half of a percentage point, representing one-fifth of the damage that was done to canadian labour markets by the recession. after summer 2010, however, further labour market progress ground to a halt, as governments shifted from stimulus to austerity and private business investment stagnated. 6 as will be discussed, even the employment rate does not capture the deterioration in the quality of work (represented by trends such as increased part-time, contract, and precarious work) that is another feature of a chronically depressed labour market. the myth of canadian exceptionalism | 25 during the two years from mid-2010 through mid-2012, the employment rate stagnated at an average of 61.8 percent. the employment rate remains 2 full percentage points below the pre-recession peak. regaining that pre-recession peak would require the creation of an incremental 570,000 jobs, doubling the number of actual net jobs created in canada between fall 2008 and mid-2012. this analysis is rooted solely in the quantity of employment in canada’s labour market, not its quality. but since 2008 there has also been a significant deterioration in the quality of employment in canada, measured by the incidence of part-time, temporary, and lowwage work. from october 2008 (the pre-recession peak in canadian employment) through summer 2012, over one third of net new jobs created in canada were part-time. the share of part-time employment has declined slightly since the recovery formally began in july 2009, but is nevertheless considerably higher than before the recession began. similarly, there has been a net reallocation of employment toward lower-wage industries since the recession began. employment in those sectors of the economy (defined at the two-digit level) which pay higher-than-average wages was still lower in mid-2012 than in october 2008 (mostly due to the net loss of over 200,000 jobs during this time in manufacturing). that means that new jobs in lower-wage sectors account for more than 100 percent of all net new jobs created since the pre-recession peak. this has reinforced the continuing longer-run decline in the average quality of jobs in the canadian labour market. this decline in employment quality means that the quantitative data on the employment rate described above (properly adjusted for population growth) understates the true extent of weakness in the canadian labour market. whether measured by output or employment, therefore, it is clear that canada is still grappling with the after-effects of the 2008-09 downturn. in an interesting public opinion poll conducted in late 2011 by the pollara (2011) firm for the economic club of canada, a full 70 percent of canadians believed the country was still in an economic recession – even though, according to economists, the recession had officially ended two-and-a-half years earlier. from the perspective of a labour market that was hammered by the recession, and has barely recouped any of that damage since, it is quite understandable why average canadians could be forgiven for concluding that the recession is still with us. in terms of the employment rate, it clearly still is. 26 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism part ii: international comparisons failing to take account of population growth also distorts international comparisons of economic and employment performance, just as it distorts comparisons over time. for example, canada experienced the 9th fastest rate of gdp expansion in the oecd, on average, since 2007. however, canada has a higher-than-average rate of population growth, and hence must generate faster gdp growth simply to “stand still” in terms of per capita standards. if we adjust for differential population growth rates, then canada’s gdp performance is only mediocre within the sample of industrialized countries. table 1 reports the cumulative evolution of real per capita gdp across the oecd from 2007 through 2011. of the 34 countries in the oecd, canada ranks only 16th – almost exactly in the middle. real per capita gdp for 2011 was still 1.4 percent lower than in 2007. twelve oecd countries have regained and surpassed their pre-recession levels of real per capita gdp (including germany, korea, australia, and several others). these countries might more honestly be able to claim to have repaired the economic damage from their recessions.7 canada, in contrast, can make no such claim. other countries (including sweden, the netherlands, belgium, and new zealand) have yet to regain their pre-recession real per capita gdp benchmarks, but have experienced smaller declines in that measure than canada has. of the countries which have experienced a worse decline in real per capita gdp since 2007 than canada, several experienced full-blown financial crises, complete with bank failures and large losses of apparent wealth. this group includes ireland, greece, and iceland (the worst-hit countries), along with the u.k. and the u.s. the fact that canada’s more strongly regulated banking system avoided these worst-case manifestations of the global crisis clearly contributed to canada’s avoidance of those very large declines in living standards (and the reasons for this outcome are discussed below). however, among the sub-set of countries which did not experience bank failures and associated consequences, canada’s gdp performance has been relatively poor. of course, there are many factors affecting each country’s performance during and after the crisis (in addition to the stability of their respective financial institutions). canada’s international standing is similarly mediocre in terms of our labour market recovery. canada’s economy must generate some7 as noted in section i, however, simply regaining a pre-recession peak in per capita gdp does not take into account the problem that real output, in the intervening years, has continued to lag far behind potential output. the myth of canadian exceptionalism | 27 thing like 225,000 new jobs per year just to keep pace with the ongoing expansion of the working age population.8 it is not sufficient, then, for politicians to point out that the total number of jobs now exceeds the prerecession peak. in the nearly four years since that time, the working age population has grown by 1.3 million. a much faster pace of job creation would have been needed in order to create opportunity for new labour force entrants, as well as re-employ those who were displaced by the downturn. many other industrialized countries, in contrast, do not face that same challenge. population in some oecd countries (like japan, germany, much of eastern europe, and several others) is stagnant or growing very slowly. in that context, total employment might not grow much at all – yet a given employment rate could still be sustained. table 2 reports the change in each oecd country’s employment rate from 2007 (the last full year before the recession) to 2011.9 canada’s average employment rate for 2011 was 0.8 points below its average level for 2007.10 that ranks canada 17th out of the 33 reporting oecd countries included in table 2. eleven countries (including germany, korea, and australia) achieved a higher employment rate by 2011 than was experienced before the recession. these countries, then, can more genuinely claim to have fully repaired the labour market damage of the recession. in france and japan, the employment rate is still lower than in 2007, but the decline was not as steep as in canada. as with table 1, the hardest-hit countries in terms of the decline in the employment rate include those (such as greece, ireland, iceland, and the u.s.) where banks collapsed and vast amounts of credit were destroyed. among a peer group of oecd economies which did not experience such extreme financial shocks, however, canada’s employment performance (like the evolution of gdp) has been relatively poor. part iii: understanding canadian financial stability an influential stream within the broader ideology of canadian exceptionalism is the myth that canadian banks were blameless in the events of the 2008-09 financial crisis and the resulting recession. canadian banks are strong and safe, the argument goes; they were prudent, 8 this estimate represents the product of the annual absolute growth in the working age population times the pre-recession employment rate. 9 chile does not report this data and hence is excluded from table 2. 10 table 2 reports the decline in canada’s employment rate between 2007 and 2011 as 0.8 percentage points, compared to the full 2-point decline in that rate illustrated above in figure 2. the reason for the difference is because table 2 reports the difference in full-year averages (in order to facilitate international comparisons), whereas figure 2 illustrates the more dramatic evolution in the monthly series. 28 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism and above all they (unlike u.s. banks) were not bailed out.11 this argument is invoked in order to deflect critical attention away from canadian financial players, even as other countries (like the u.k. and u.s.) debate how to strengthen financial regulation, and indeed challenge the general political and cultural legitimacy of financial elites. in actuality, canadian banks were bailed out – and powerfully so. at the end of 2008, and the beginning of 2009, federal finance minister flaherty and other federal officials implemented a new program called the extraordinary financing framework (eff). this package of measures consisted of several different ways to assist canadian banks, enhancing their liquidity and shifting risks off their balance sheets, during their hour of need. the major components of the eff included: • using the public mortgage insurance company (canadian mortgage and housing corporation) to buy securitized mortgages from the banks in order to inject cash into the banks’ coffers. • providing large loans, at near-zero interest rates, from the bank of canada, when commercial lenders would not do so. • providing other lines of credit from the bank of canada and other agencies, including in u.s. dollars. • even the u.s. federal reserve bank supported the canadian banks with major assistance offered through its emergency liquidity program. these loans and other liquidity injections were backed up with very unusual forms of collateral – or sometimes with no collateral at all. for example, the bank of canada was willing to accept asset-backed commercial paper (abcp) from the banks to back up some of these emergency loans. this was just a year after the entire abcp market froze up in canada, even before the global meltdown, as a result of growing investor concern regarding the true nature and value of some of the securitized assets contained in abcp products. individual abcp owners were left 11 federal government officials boasted about the relative stability of canadian banks right through the crisis – even as they were channeling unprecedented sums of emergency assistance to those institutions. for example, the government claimed in 2009 that “canada’s financial system has shown exceptional stability throughout the crisis and has become a globally noted leader in best banking practices.” (government of canada, 2009, p.165). the president of the canadian bankers’ association (cba) stated baldly that “not one bank in canada …required a cent in taxpayer-funded bailouts” (anthony, 2010, p.11). some of the debate hinges on a matter of semantics: when is a bail-out not a bail-out? as another cba spokesperson put it, bank critics “seem to be implying that liquidity support is the same as a bank bailout and this is not the case” (tencer, 2012). whether it is called a “bailout” or “liquidity support,” it is a matter of record that over $100 billion of public funds were injected into the private banks in their moment of need. the myth of canadian exceptionalism | 29 holding illiquid paper. but banks with abcp were able to convert it into liquid cash, courtesy of the bank of canada, when they needed it. in total, various federal agencies offered the banks a maximum of up to $200 billion in cash and short term low-interest loans, at a point in time when the banks could not attain this financing from normal commercial sources because of the global crisis. at peak, it is estimated that canadian banks tapped $114 billion of this potential line of credit (macdonald, 2012). incredibly, canadian banks remained profitable right through the dramatic events of 2008 and 2009. every one of the five largest banks declared an annual profit, and only one of them (the cibc) declared even a quarterly loss during the darkest days of the crisis. as credit and economic conditions stabilized, profits strengthened further, and the banks were able to quickly repay the government assistance, with interest in some cases. nevertheless, there is no denying that canadian banks received unprecedented financial support from government in order to survive the crisis, and that without that support there is considerable likelihood that one or more major canadian banks would have failed.12 in this regard, canadian banks were clearly “saved” (or “bailed out”) by powerful public intervention. moreover, quite distinct from the emergency support offered up during the moment of crisis in 2008-09, the canadian financial system has benefited in a longer-term sense from a public policy regime which is accommodating, supportive, and protective. these long-standing protections and subsidies have served to create a domestic financial industry that is more stable and profitable than those in other countries. it was this policy context (not the good judgment or “prudence” of canadian bank executives) which explains why canada’s financial system withstood the storms of 2008-09 more safely than banks in the u.s., the u.k., or europe did.13 deposits up to $100,000 per person per bank are fully guaranteed by the canadian deposit insurance corporation. this eliminates the incentive for a “run” on the bank, and stabilizes the whole system. most home mortgages are insured by the canadian mortgage and housing corporation. this eliminates most of the risk for banks in 12 macdonald’s (2012) study notes that at various times the estimated extent of public lending to three of the big five canadian banks exceeded the market value of the banks; without government support, then, those banks would have been fully “under water.” 13 a very useful summary of the history and nature of canadian bank regulation, and the continuing risks associated with leveraged private banking even in that more stable context, is provided by russell, 2012. 30 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism writing new mortgages, and also makes it easier for them to “collateralize” their mortgages (packaging them into bonds which are sold to financial investors).14 by attaching conditions to the mortgages it ensures (such as requiring minimum down payment ratios or maximum amortization timetables), the cmhc contributes to higher quality in mortgage loans, further reducing risk. the federal government prohibits foreign takeovers of canadian banks. this prevented any major bank from being swallowed up in the mid-2000s when u.s. banks (riding high on the bubble) were scouring the world for acquisitions. earlier in the 200s, the previous liberal federal government also vetoed mergers between the major canadian banks, which also likely contributed to their relatively lower leverage ratios as they headed into the crisis. canadian bank services are heavily subsidized by the canadian tax system, including through the partial taxation of capital gains and dividends, the deductibility of carrying charges, and a plethora of tax shelters for financial investments (such as registered retirement savings plans, registered education savings plans, tax-free savings accounts, and now pooled registered pension plans. both during the global financial crisis, and in a longer-term perspective, the canadian financial industry benefits from a multidimensional framework of government support, subsidy, and stabilization. it is certainly true that the relative stability of canadian banks has been a positive feature of canada’s economic experience since 2008. but that relative stability can be ascribed neither to the judgment or acumen of canadian bankers (who were heavily engaged in leveraged, speculative activities like their counterparts around the world), nor to the specific policy actions of the current canadian government (which inherited the structure of canadian bank regulation from much-earlier predecessors). conclusion since the onset of the global financial crisis and subsequent recession, canadian political leaders have stressed that while things may be difficult for canadians, they are getting better, and the ground lost in the recession has been quickly recovered. moreover, canada is said to have escaped the worst effects of the recession, which hit home 14 this practice also meant that the incremental risk shifted to government by the purchase of mortgages from the banks during the crisis was modest, since those mortgages were already insured by the public agency. the myth of canadian exceptionalism | 31 more painfully in other industrialized countries. many canadians accepted this argument (perhaps due more to the power of sheer repetition, rather than empirical validity), and this contributed to the conservative party’s successful campaign for a majority mandate in may 2011. this mantra of canadian exceptionalism is refuted by an analysis of appropriate measures of economic performance. the damage of the recession is still very much with canadians – and is especially visible in the labour market. real per capita gdp is still below its pre-recession peak, and several thousand dollars per person below its potential level (given pre-recession trends). and the labour market is still much weaker (measured by the employment rate) than before the recession. indeed, measured by the employment rate, only one-fifth of the damage has been repaired, and no further progress has been made on this measure in the last two years. internationally, canada’s performance according to both standards is at best mediocre. certainly, canada has done better than those countries which experienced major banking and financial crises during the 2008-09 downturn (such as the u.s., the u.k., ireland, iceland, greece, and italy). but among the broader set of industrialized countries, canadian performance in terms of output and employment ranks exactly at the mid-point of the sample. instead of allowing politicians to claim credit for doing better than america or italy, they should be challenged to explain why canada’s performance during this time has lagged so far behind many other industrial countries (including germany, korea, australia, and others). in short, the self-congratulatory and triumphalist tone of so many official economic pronouncements in canada is clearly unjustified. in terms of its implications for economic and fiscal policy, the incomplete and relatively weak state of canada’s economic recovery should give considerable pause to policy-makers before embarking on a campaign of fiscal austerity – a campaign which will clearly further undermine output and employment which are still weak. instead, top priority needs to be placed on expansionary measures to strengthen a recovery that has been slow, incomplete, and unsteady. 32 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism references anthony, n.h. (2010, june 30). the facts on banks. winnipeg free press, p.11. department of finance canada. (2008, november 21). protecting canada’s future: economic and fiscal statement. ottawa: department of finance. government of canada. (2009). canada’s economic action plan: a fourth report to canadians. ottawa: government of canada. macdonald, d. (2012). the big banks’ big secret: estimating government support for canadian banks during the financial crisis. ottawa: canadian centre for policy alternatives. pollara. (2011). the economic club of canada. http://www.pollara.com/ eclub2012/report.pdf russell, e. (2012). no more swimming naked: the need for modesty in canadian banking. ottawa: canadian centre for policy alternatives. stanford, j. (2012). canada’s incomplete, mediocre recovery. ottawa: canadian centre for policy alternatives. ——— (2012). a budget for the rest of us: alternative federal budget 2012. ottawa: canadian centre for policy alternatives. tencer, d. (2012, april 30). canada bank bailout cost $114 billion at peak. huffington post. http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2012/04/30/canadabank-bailout-costccpa_n_1464398.html pressuring the canadian state for women's rights: the role of the national action committee on the status of women cerise morris this paper examines the history , structure and operation of the national action committee on the status of women (nac) . charged with the enormous task of addressing all women's issues tiith public policy implications , the argument is that the organisation is undeservedly criticised as elitist and ineffective . in addition to its broad mandate , the weaknesses and limitations of nac are attributed to certain restraining conditions : class, ethnic and ideological divisions within the constituency and membership , a high leadership turn-over and the dilemma of restrictive government funding versus time consuming fund-raising . pressure groups, or public-interest groups as they are often called, are "organizations whose members act together to influence public policy in order to promote their common interest" (pross, 1975:2). interest-group liberalism assumes that the public interest and the public policy agenda should be defined in terms of the organized interests of society (lowi , 1968). accordingly, all sectors of society may participate in the democratic process by banding together to express and defend their interests. the aggregation, ordering and balancing of interests thus defined constitutes the ongoing policy process. according to lowi (1969:71) this working model rests on the following assumptions: (1) organized interests are homogeneous and easy to define, sometimes monolithic. any "duly elected" spokesman for any interest is taken as speaking in close approximation for each and every member. (2) organized interests pretty much fill up and adequately represent most of the sectors of our lives, so that one organized group can be found effectively answering and checking some other organized group as it seeks to prosecute its claims against society. and, (3) the role of government is one of ensuring access particularly to the most effectively organized and or ratifying the agreements and adjustments worked out among the competing leaders and their claims. this last assumption is supposed to be a statement of how our democracy works and how it ought to work. taken together, these assumptions constitute the adam smith "hidden hand" model. fbst of the literature on pressure groups is specific to the united states. wiile there are clearly many similarities between the united states and canadian socio-political systems, the differences are too important to be obscured by reliance on theory and analysis generated by the united states experience. as pross (1975:5) emphasizes, "the structure and behaviour of pressure groups are functions of the political systems in which they are located." the little research that has been done on canadian pressure groups is more descriptive than analytical. pross, therefore, has developed a 88 conceptual framework for analyzing pressure groups. the institutional continuum model, as he calls it, distinguishes between "issue-oriented" groups at one end of a four-point continuum, and "institutional" groups at the other end. groups are categorized according to their organizational characteristics. the process of institutionalization culminates in the ideal type of pressure group characterized by organizational continuity and cohesion; expert knowledge of relevant government sectors; stable membership; well-formu) ated , short-term objectives; and high regard for overall organizational imperatives. issue-oriented groups have characteristics which are opposite to those of the institutional pressure group. in reality, of course, particular groups cannot be expected to conform exactly to the typology here, but pross contends that the pattern does represent the central tendency. in canada, political power and control over policy lies within two federal structures: the party system and the bureaucracy, "both of which achieve an apex in the cabinet" (pross, 1975:18). parliament or individual mps are not the first target of pressure group activists. according to one experienced lobbyist, quoted by van loon and vshittington (1976:306), "vvrien i see members of parliament being lobbied, it's a sure sign to me that the lobby lost its fight in the civil service and the cabinet." the task of formulating policy belongs to the bureaucracy; for cabinet ministers this is a secondary role. recent changes in the canadian political process have altered the context in which pressure groups act, with subsequent implications for their behaviour (aucoin, 1975) . these changes have occurred in three areas: (1) the policy advisory functions of the prime minister's office and the privy council office have expanded to de-emphasize the bureaucratic departmentalization of policy formulation and re-assert the 89 primacy of the political executive in the setting and monitoring of policies. (2) the prime minister's office and the privy council office now advise on broad policy concerns across departmental lines, providing cabinet members with a broad context in which to evaluate advice from their individual departments. (3) the standing committees in the commons have been re-organized along national policy lines. these reforms have forced pressure groups to: (1) assume a more public role and provide more expert documentation; (2) demonstrate that their proposals conform with the public interest and national priorities; and (3) compete openly with other groups for material and power resources. canadian pressure groups face a different set of circumstances from their united states counterparts, because of canada's parliamentary-cabinet system (cawson, 1975:35). according to pross (1975), the canadian political system is based less on a pluralistic, competitive approach to decision-making than the united states political system. the parliamentary system of government does not allow pressure groups to exploit rivalries between houses of legislature as they do in the united states. nor is there as much rivalry betwen government agencies in canada as there is in the united states. consequently, issue generation is de-emphasized in canada in favour of access, which as pross notes, need not be a function of publicity. access to the bureaucracy and the cabinet depends upon careful cultivation of relationships and channels of communication, possession of expert knowledge, and adoption of an accommodative and consensus-seeking approach. it follows, then, that pressure groups whose characteristics most closely approximate the institutional type have the greatest likelihood of achieving their objectives for influencing public policy. as pross observes: 90 the canadian policy system. . .tends to favour elite groups, making functional accommodative, consensus-seeking techniques of political communication, rather than conflict-oriented techniques that are directed towards the achievement of objectives through arousing public opinion (1975:19). pross hypothesizes that pressure group success is associated with two main behavioural characteristics: the cultivation of access to public decision-makers in the relevant policy areas, and the demonstrated willingness to accept short-term defeats in the interest of maintaining good relations and achieving long-term success. two imperatives follow: the necessity for non-partisanship, and the necessity of maintaining staff headquarters in ottawa. dawson (1975:46) describes the prerequisites to successful pressure group influence on the bureaucracy in particular: a wide network of acquaintances, and even friends, within the bureaucracy, is essential for utilization of all the opportunities... the group and its officials must have a reputation for expertise, reliability and political non-partisanship. they should be able to provide accurate information quickly; they must be reliable about keeping confidences; preferably they should try to restrain their clientele from great public excesses. if the relationship is working properly there is a constant two-way flow of information. restraining conditions facing pressure groups in canada for groups willing to operate within this framework of realpolitik , what are the restraining conditions? goldstein contends in his study of the consumer's association of canada that pressure groups work with certain inherent disadvantages in the capitalist democracies. "these problems include limited financial resources, limited political legitimacy and particular difficulties in defining their priorities clearly" (1979:137-38). in particular, goldstein notes, "general" groups, characterized by broad goals and the inability to provide material rewards to members, have difficulty in developing strategies to 91 overcome these inherent disadvantages. lawson's (1975) analysis emphasizes the relationship between federalism on the one hand, with its over-riding question of jurisdiction and its requirement that a "national consensus" be constructed out of varying regional priorities and interests, and the financial constraints which pressure groups face on the other hand: the problems associated with unclear constitutional jurisdiction and group difficulty in aggregating client demands into cohesive country-wide policies are the cause of major weaknesses in pressure groups claiming national support. they affect not only the groups' ability to perform effectively their role in influencing federal government policies, but have also led... to financial instability. the problem is most serious for groups vvhich depend upon "voluntary assessment" from component organizations.. .the financial weakness is exacerbated by the necessity of maintaining well-staffed offices at both levels, and it also has an adverse effect on the frequency of board and executive meetings, thus compounding the normal communication problems extant in larger national organizations. lack of money has led to restrictions of activity at the national level or to acceptance of a government subsidy or grant (1 975: 33, emphasis added) . for loney, whose 1977 critique takes a marxist view, this last point is critical in understanding the restraining conditions facing voluntary groups concerned with social change. government funding of the voluntary sector must be understood as an important instrument of social control. in themid-60s, loney notes, the federal government expanded its support in the field of citizen participation beyond established agencies to include innovative and apparently radical groups: it could of course be argued that all of this represents no more than the laudable desire of the government to facilitate the fuller workings of democracy. in fact, government has a very pronounced effect on the way in which democracy works, serving to contain the debate within broad, but nonetheles definable, parameters (1977:457). loney' s data on such recent federal programs as company of young canadians and opportunities for youth lend some support to his claim. 92 as vvell , the literature generally supports the viev; that public interest groups have little hope of succe3sfully influencing public policy if they are belligerent or uncompromising, or if they employ non-routine techniques in pursuit of their goals. the case of the national action committee on the status of women: the women's federal lobby 1. history the roots of the national action committee on the status of women (nac) lie in the campaign to establish the royal commission on the status of women in canada (rcsw) , led by a group of prominent, toronto-based activists with laura sabia at their head (see morris, 1980) . nac was founded by these same women, and the thirty-two groups they represented along with some twenty newly-formed feminist groups, to pressure the federal government to implement the rcsw recommendations. the mandate to create nac was given by the five hundred delegates to the 1972 "strategy for change" convention, chaired by sabia. its formation represented a major response to the rcsw report by one of its main consti tuenci es . as an umbrella organization, nac maintained its diversity at the national level with the aim of truly representing canadian women. nac founders saw from the outset that it was essential to keep women of all classes involved, especially those from the labour movement. working-class women offered social criticism viiile professional, academic, and business women, and some women from the public service, offered mainstream political experience and contacts (lorna marsden, personal interview, september, 1978). 93 2. structure by 1980, nac represented one hundred and fifty non-governmental groups from across the country. these ranged from the large, established women's voluntary organizations which have been the mainstay of nac — groups such as the national council of jewish women and the canadian federation of business and professional women's clubs — to newer "status of women" and issue-oriented feminist groups, such as the hamilton rape crisis centre and kelowna status of women action society, lb join nac, groups must have at least ten members and be sponsored by another member organization. individuals do not have voting rights in nac, although they may participate as observers and "friends of nac." as such, they make financial contributions and are invited to support activities. eight of the twenty-two members on the executive are elected by groups within their own region. the executive is constitutionally empowered to run the organization; its agenda is set at n^c's annual meetings. all affiliates accept nac's official purposes, which are: 1. to press for the implementation of the recommendations of the royal commission on the status of women and for additional reforms supported by the participating organizations; 2. to encourage communication between organizations, local groups, and individuals working to improve the status of women in canada (nac brochure, n.d.) . because of the breadth and generality of these objectives, nac's member organizations are highly diversified in ideology, and class, regional, and ethnic interests. this diversity produces conflicts of interest among member organizations and disputes over priorities. yet nac has never formally excluded a group, and the views of both the communist party of canada and the ywca are aired. for historical reasons, nac was based in tbronto. although the 94 organization was national in scope, the initial organization and executive decision-making was largely carried out by the toronto women. given limited financial resources and the inevitable conflict of loyalties for women representing their far-flung local and regional organizations, it was deemed easier to depend upon members living in tbronto. predictably, this led to tensions and charges of narrowness and elitism in the executive, which, in any case, effectively is nac. the problem of adequate representation of regional interests and priorities was seriously debated in kpic. although funds were raised (or diverted) for members to travel to tbronto for monthly executive meetings, the whole question of regionalism remains a problem for the organization. one member of the executive articulated some of the difficulties and frustrations related to this question in 1978: when i hear the suggestion that regional representation include areas such as "the prairie provinces and territories" or "the atlantic provinces," i shudder. i cannot conceive of one person providing meaningful representation from areas which are so large. in alberta, for example, we face the problem of not being able to liaise with women from the far north and even south of the province. our needs and interests are often quite different and frequently i feel hopelessly inadequate when i attempt to speak for sisters scattered so far apart. ..i believe we must establish what regionalism implies to a) member groups and b) nac. what are the objectives of regional representatives and what obligations do they have to nac and to their areas? perhaps it's mandatory for regional rep's to have back up a consulting group in their areas, but then it seems to me that even more funding has to be found to not only back nac but also the smaller regional groups. funds everywhere are tight. . .being a member of the nac executive is a commitment to work, and electing a regional representative who has no commitment to working or being actively involved in some specific aspect (s) of nac is ridiculous. surely we can avoid tokenism in our feminist groups (pat preston, "regional representation.. .some thoughts" mimeo., undated). the problems for public interest groups with limited financial resources have been summed up by goldstein (1979:139): "since they represent no special interests, they are unlikely to possess any 95 automatic source cf financial support and must scramble for money where they can." this condition is aggravated when the public pressure group is an umbrella organization for voluntary groups, as is nac. f^embers of nac owe their primary allegiance to their own organizations. nac neither expects nor receives significant financial support from its groups or their individual members. annual dues range from $15.00 to $25.00, depending upon size and type of the group. while nac depends largely upon federal government funding for its operations [1], there are pronounced differences of opinion within the organization about the wisdom of this situation. some fear that dependence upon government funding will lead inevitably to cooptation; others that nac has already been coopted, in deed if not in word.t2] still others feel that cooptation is neither necessary nor inevitable. three models for funding were debated at nac's 1981 annual meeting (from discussion paper, finance and funding workshop, 1981 nac annual meeting) : 1. complete self-sufficiency, with all money being raised by nac and no government funding. 2. core funding from the government, with nac raising a percentage of its budget from other sources. 3. ail funding from the government, with additional input from affiliation fees. in the opinion of nac leadership, self-sufficiency is presently unattainable. the second model is currently followed within the organization and probably best reflects present realities. there is no strong current of opinion in favour of the third model, complete dependence upon government funding. the extent to which nac is constrained by limited funding is best illustrated by the fact that in 1981 it was still unable to maintain permanent headquarters or lobbyists in ottawa . 96 methods of influence 1. action oriented toward the policy system nac operates, as a canadian pressure group of national scope must, by attempting to influence the bureaucracy and cabinet. it has two ways of doing this: through its annual ottawa lobbying with cabinet ministers and mps, and through briefs and position papers on current policy issues affecting the status of women, which it is invited with increasing frequency to present to parliamentary committees. priorities are determined by the membership at an annual meeting. between meetings, the executive committee responds to issues as they arise. former nac president, lorna marsden, explained the campaign for 'equal pay for work of equal value': there was a wrangle within the cabinet about whether the equal wages provision should get into the human rights commission or should remain in labour. since we favoured its remaining in labour, we contacted monro and his officials to put forward that view. our contact took two forms. at our annual meeting and lobbying in ottawa in april 1976, we invited the ministers and representatives to come to appear on a panel. our members that evening included well-informed women from across the country. our anger and distress at the ill-informed responses from the members of parliament and their representatives had quite an impact on some members of parliament and government. subsequently we were invited to several long meetings in both toronto and ottawa with representatives of both the minister of labour and the minister of justice concerning our point of view. . . in the meantime, several of us inside the government party (liberal) had been lobbying with the prime minister and his assistants, the party leaders, and the minister responsible for the status of women, using nac materials and positions. women in the other parties had been lobbying with their members of parliament and party leaders. questions were asked in the house and in party meetings.. .the bill was withdrawn for amendments in 1975 and for a long time we had to rely on inside information and our contacts for news of what was going on... the lobbying had some impact although our view that equal pay for work of equal value be included in existing labour legislation was not sustained. the federal government re-introduced the issue as a new bill (c-25) in november 1976, complete with the equal value section added (1979:254-55). 97 although in this case nac was only partially successful in achieving its policy objectives, marsden's account demonstrates the way in which the organization operates. clearly, nac's informal methods of influence were important in this campaign, as dawson (1975) and pross (1975) stressed above. nac leaders are firmly plugged into the federal women's network and many key women in the government are also nac members. [3] nac need not rely entirely on informal contacts with women in high places. among its own leadership are women who have mainstream political legitimacy and political access on their own terms. marsden, for example, is a senior sociologist at the university of tbronto, and was elected to the national policy chair of the liberal party of canada in 1980. many nac leaders are affiliated with either the liberals or the ncp, and have attained prominence in their professional or public lives. in this way, nac is able to participate informally in the policy-raking process. marsden's account of nac's campaign for 'equal pay for equal value' also illustrates this aspect of influence: the bill was withdrawn for amendments in 1975 and for a long time we had to rely on inside information and our contacts for news of what was going on. influencial people, such as the former head of the women's eureau in the department of labour were reported to be against the equal value concept on "practical" grounds. several of us knew lawyers inside the ministry and asked them to get us news. "anonymous" brown paper envelopes came our way. at social gatherings we pressed for news and questions. officials in town on other business would stop off for a chat in our offices. a newly formed and highly effective organization of women lawyers and legal secretaries made presentations and briefs and accompanied us on lobbying visits. the ontario government formed a study group on which one of our members sat. officials in the ontario government, while remaining officially neutral, unofficially pressed us to continue, fed us information, and warned us of impending developments (1979:255). 2. mobilizing the constituency and influencing public opinion nac is always trying to strengthen its support base and inform 98 and influence public opinion about status-of-women issues. oie major vehicle has been its status of women news , a political magazine published an average of four times a year between 1974 and 1980. publication was suspended in 1980 due to lack of funds, but was to be resumed in 1981. tbtal circulation of the magazine in 1980 was about 2,500 copies. distribution was limited to feminist centres, community groups, women's organizations and subscribers. according to haviva hosek, nac's secretary at the time of writing, the importance of status of women news in achieving nac's goals is "unclear," but the organization remains committed to using the magazine as a platform for communication. it intends to launch a subscription campaign and otherwise attanpt to enlarge the magazine's circulation in canada. nac's decision to resume publication was based on two considerations. first, nac was granted a budget increase by the secretary of state in 1980, enabling the organization to meet publication costs without sacrificing other priorities. second, several other feminist publications ceased operation around the same time as status , and will not be resurrected. [4] there is, then, a lack of feminist-oriented publications with national focus and distribution. "our decision to resume publication of status can be viewed in a different publishing context now, which may influence its impact" (hosek, personal interview, october, 1981). all member groups and "friends of nac" receive nac memo , a monthly mimeographed bulletin concerning nac activities and current issues and events affecting women. as well, nac reproduces copies of its position papers and briefs, and has printed a cross-referenced index of all its resolutions and recommendations since 1972. the organization 99 also sponsors and participates in public events such as conferences. perceptions of nac nac is not a household word for women in canada, even though it is the only national voluntary organization dedicated entirely to defending and enlarging women's rights through political lobbying. it is likely that the majority of people outside of the women's movement and policy networks have never heard of the organization. among those who know nac, opinion is divided about its orientation and effectiveness. a humorous comment made by a feminist activist during a panel discussion on the direction of the women's movement in canada conveyed the unflattering image of ^c: "if the major american women's organization is called ncw, ours should be called later! t5] responding to the lack of public awareness of nac and perceptions of it as a pale and ineffective imitation of the american national organization for women (ncw) , marsden said t>pvc does not have the resources to influence the general public effectively. there is, however, a more fundamental reason for nac's style: first, many issues of the women's movement are too complex to be put forward in a useful way to influence public opinion; eg. "crummy pay" is ok to talk about, but strategic considerations of equal pay for work of equal value are too complex. . .more fundamentally, if you look at the way social change occurs in canada most impact comes from influence on institutional authorities challenged in a quiet, straightforward way not from populist protest. we're about change, not protest (marsden, interview, october, 1978). while the latter point (which marsden stressed was fundamental) is not necessarily an adequate description of the social change process in canada, it does support pross' (1975) argument. pross traced the process of organizational maturation within the women's liberation movement from its early beginnings in the 1960's to its present stage of 100 development : demonstrations still occurred but they were more orderly and less flamboyant, and increasingly they were supplemented or replaced by careful documentation of women's grievances and reasoned discussion of proposed solutions. confrontation with officials has become less common. as these changes occurred women's lib [sic] groups ceased to be issue-oriented and became fledgling and then mature organi2ations. . . those concerned with continuing problems or able to provide desirable selective benefits will be the most likely to survive at the institutional or mature level (1975:17). because many of the issues of the women's movement are philosophically and technically complex 'equal pay' and 'affirmative action' are two examples nac favours strategies which put "a group of well-prepared, articulate, and pragmatic women together with those who actually implement law in a face-to-face negotiation. the important point of a_ social movement is to get £ concept accepted (marsden, 1979:248; emphasis added) . nac's behaviour conforms to pross' model of an "institutional" pressure group. as such, it makes no sense to criticize it for failing to behave like an issue-oriented radical organization. in its own terms , nac is a relatively mature pressure group for women's rights; nevertheless, it has frequently been the object of criticism as summarized in saturday night ("building the feminist network," unsigned, september, 1978:4) : what critics contended is that it's either elitist, wishy-washy, ineffectual, invisible, has forgotten its middle name, and is a waste of time and money. for one thing, it remains entirely dependent for funds (about $55,000 a year) on the very government it's supposed to lobby; so, inevitably it has sought to avoid biting the hand that feeds it. for another, it continues to accommodate such a spectrum of viewpoints that it's been unable to avoid compromising on practically everything. many women within the federal government, some of whom belong to nac, either as "friends" or representatives of non-governmental, cntario women's groups, feel nftc has yet to develop sophisticated political 101 strategies. as one wc representative who refused to be named observed: "there is no shared analytic understanding of social change; it is more by leadership and luck than by design that nac has had an impact." another federal woman who is a "friend of nac" said: nac is the closest thing we have to a representative group... it is as effective as the women who come from the member groups, and there is frequent turnover—their lobbying is largely symbolic, but is a good learning process for women. their orientation is more 'women's rights' than feminist, per se, a 1978 version of the national council of women. the advisory council on the status of women is more sophisticated, and has more behind-the-scenes expertise than nac. nor does nac have the funds necessary to produce good research (hellie wilson, personal interview, july 1978) . and from a civil servant in the employment and immigration ministry, involved in the development of voluntary affirmative action programmes: nac is not equivalent to now, partly because it is an umbrella organization and they see themselves that way. nac has been useful in saying what needs to be said, but in this department we don't see any followup after their annual lobby day. . .what the bureaucrats understand is political pressure, and this is what women don't yet know how to do effectively (elizabeth mcallister, august, 1978). the key to understanding nac's weaknesses and limitations as a pressure group, i believe, is to be found in an examination of the restraining conditions it faces. restraining conditions for nac nac's diversity necessitates discussion, negotiation and compromise in order to arrive at organizational consensus. positions adopted through this process cannot please nor accurately reflect all of nac's constituent parts. since the rhetoric and to some extent the practice of nac is based on participatory democracy, internal dissension can be a draining experience for the organization. insiders fear the organization could fall apart over a fundamental issue and some feel that members need to tread carefully. what could destroy nac? 102 centrists fear a possible "take-over" by more left-leaning and confrontation-oriented members. leftists, on the other hand, view the dominant central tendency, middle of the road approach of nac as a fundamental obstacle to "real social action on behalf of women's liberation," as one critical delegate at the 1980 annual meeting put it. this is not to imply that nac fails to deal with fundamental women's issues; rather, the problem is nac's vulnerability to internal, ideological conflict. "the real split is in terms of the confrontation-adversarial approach versus the lobby-andinfluence approach" (hosek, personal interview, august, 1981) . the complex and technical task of defining issues, and the education and expertise called for by the 'brief and lobby 1 method tends to exclude less educated and less politically-involved women from a pressure group such as nac. vhile this may be inevitable, the fact is a source of irritation to women who have been steeped in an ideology stressing egalitarianism, anti-hierarchical organization, and the ideals of participatory democracy. given this orientation, the charges of 'elitism' leveled against i*ac are inevitable. class, ethnic and ideological divisions within nac are further exacerbated by 'regional pull,' which has been a great problem for the organization. the demands of regionalism appear too great for nac's limited resources. scholars such as eawson (1975) and van loon and whittington (1971) point to the impact on canadian pressure groups of problems associated with federalism and regional disparities. marsden summarizes the particular impact of these problems on voluntary organizations such as nac: the existence of two official languages in the country, and many cultural traditions, is a hard social fact which affects every social organization.. .any group trying to bring about social change in the country. . .has to face these divided loyalties. an 103 attempt to build a national network of people often breaks dovvn under the pull of regional concerns. it is also incredibly expensive in money and time to canvas a country over three thousand miles wide with five time zones. a voluntary movement, like the women's movement, is hard hit by these divisions. on issues of major concern, canadian women must address themselves to both federal and provincial legislation and administrations, usually with different political parties in charge. an attempt to build consensus on any issue implies building a compromise position that will take into account the sensibilities of french and english, catholics, protestants, and jews, the economic interests of the various regions, the dominance of central canada, especially much-hated toronto, and the dependent position of the economically poor regions such as much of the maritimes (1979:248). the critical problem of funding is exacerbated by the fact and implications of nac's raison d'etre as a woman's organization pursuing woc.en's rights. no matter which funding model prevails, the problems will likely remain: more government funding requires more vigilance in the face of real fears about dependence and cooptation, while less funding (or none at all) requires more organizational energy devoted to fund-raising — and the prospect, at least, of t^c's disintegration. finally, the fact that b&c is often used as a political training grojnd means that some leadership will inevitably be lost to other career pursuits. this phenomenon is neither unusual nor unexpected. active involvement in nac means participating in a wide social network curring across major areas of public life. training is available in loobying, research and brief writing, public speaking, organizational affairs, and politics. just as the voice of women served as a training ground in the 1960's for bright, middle-class women concerned with social change, nac has filled the same role since the 1970's. because n£c cannot afford a paid, professional staff, it must continue to rely on committed volunteers to carry out its executive work. yet recruiting capable women is becoming increasingly difficult; of all women, feminists are the most likely to be actively pursuing careers, higher 104 education, and other avenues to "a larger humanity." members of the executive work ten hours a week for n£c, on the average, in addition to their professional and personal commitments. che member of nac's executive said that, even though there .is a turnover, nac never completely loses its people, because they so frequently move on to positions of prominence and influence in canadian society and politics, carrying with them their identification with nac's objectives. [6] in this respect, at least, a high turnover on the nac executive has some benefit for the organization. conclusions nac's self-appointed task is enormous. the organization addresses, in effect, all women's issues with public policy implications. although nac focuses on the federal government, it frequently gives its attention to provincial politics as well. yet nac does not possess the resources to support offices and activities at the provincial level nor to maintain a systematic and effective follow-through or monitoring function in ottawa. instead, contacts in the advisory council on the status of women, office of the coordinator status of women and the various ministries must be relied upon for inside information. without funds for professional staff to perform research and public relations functions, nac must nonetheless be well-informed and able to demonstrate its technical expertise on any of the issues it is promoting. furthermore, nac must continue to inform the women's movement by producing regular newsletters and a magazine. women newly-elected to the executive as representatives of their grass-roots organizations often lack political sophistication. women 105 generally have not been encouraged, or afforded opportunities, to acquire this kind of learning. hence, political naivete frequently goes hand in hand with earnestness among the ranks of nac activists. it is important to appreciate fully all the conditions which shape and determine l^c's role in the policy system. some of these conditions are common to all pressure groups in canada; others are unique, or are exaggerated, because nac is a women's organization dedicated to changing the status of women. trie more we appreciate these conditions, the less we need to criticize nac for those things over which it has little or no control. as one informant said: "wc may not be everything we would wish for, but in reality, it's all we've got!" notes * this paper is a slightly modified version of a chapter in my doctoral dissertation, "no more than simple justice: the royal commission on the status of women and social change in canada" (mcgill university, department of sociology, 1982) . the data were gathered over the period 1978-1981 through personal interviews with representatives of nac's leadership, participants from member organizations and informed observers; and through study of organizational documents and participant-observation at several executive and annual general meetings of mac. [1] see morris (1982, chapter 8) for a discussion of the question of government funding of canadian women's groups. [2] loney (1977) analyzes government funding in the field of citizens' participation as a deliberate system of social control. [3] one is reminded of the feminist slogan: "we are everywhere!" more precisely, women are everywhere, though not all women are feminists nor even strongly pro-women in their sympathies. nevertheless, the j unique advantage possessed by nac as a pressure group is its raison d'etre . the women's network cuts across divisions which might block or limit the promotion of other issues or causes. the cooptable communications network which freeman (1975) posed as crucial to the formation of a social network is well -developed . its potential is even greater, since women not already active in or convinced about feminist issues may still be won over when they see the relevance to _ 106 _ their personal lives of the issue of sexual discrimination. as the ideas and vocabulary of the women's movement continue to gain currency, more women in strategic sectors will likely be recruited to the feminist cause. as lorna marsden observed: "there are two kinds of people in the bureaucracy for informal contacts nac members or converts" (from interview, october, 1978). [4] these include: branching out , upstream , and for a while, canadian women's studies . [5] my former colleague, roberta hamilton, gets the credit for this comment, though she may have been quoting a standard joke in feminist circles. [6] lynn verge, who was on the executive in 1978-79, was asked by the newfoundland progressive-conservatives to run for public office. she did, and became minister of education in newfoundland. carol swan, at the time of writing, was directing in-house economic research for the office of the coordinator status of women. and lynn macebnald and laura sabia have both run (unsuccessfully) for public office. pat preston from alberta served as an assistant to lloyd axworthy, who held the federal status of women portfolio in the federal government in 1980. wendy lawrence, executive assistant to doris anderson at the advisory council on the status of women, is a former part-time staff member at nac. lorna marsden and grace hartman remain accessible to nac. references aucoin, peter 1975 "pressure groups and recent changes in the policy-making process", paul a. pross (ed.) , pressure group behaviour in canadian politics . toronto: mcgraw-hill ryerson ltd. dawson, helen 1975 "national pressure groups and the federal government", paul a. pross (ed.) , pressure group behaviour in canadian politics . toronto: mcgraw-hill ryerson ltd. freeman, jo 1975 the politics of women's liberation . new york: david mckay co. goldstein, jonah 1979 "public interest groups and public policy: the case of the consumers association of canada", canadian journal of political science , 12(1) . loney, martin 1977 "a political economy of citizen participation", leo panitch (ed .) , the canadian state: political economy and political power . toronto: university of toronto press. 107 lowi , theodore, j. 1969 the end of liberalism: ideology, policy and the crisis of public authority . new york: norton. marsden, lorna , r. 1979 "the role of the national action commitee on the status of women in facilitating equal pay policy in canada", ronnie steinberg ratner (ed.) , equal employment policy for women , philadelphia: temple university press. morris, cerise 1980 "determination and thoroughness: the movement for a royal commission on the status of women in canada", atlantis 5(2) 1982 "no more than simple justice: the royal commission on the status of women and social change in canada", unpublished doctoral dissertation, mcgill university, 1982. national action committee on the status of women 1972 report of "strategy for change" convention, toronto. national ad hoc action committee on the status of women in canada 1972 submission to the government of canada, toronto. pross, paul a. (ed.) 1975 pressure group behaviour in canadian politics . toronto: mcgraw-hill ryerson, ltd. van loon, richard j. and michael s. whittington 1976 the canadian political system: environment, structure and process. toronto: mcgraw-hill ryerson, ltd, 2nd edition. interviews with the following people were conducted as part of the research for this paper: doris anderson, haviva hbsek, elizabeth mcallister, kay macpherson, maureen o'neil , laura sabia, and hellie wilson. i gratefully acknowledge their help, as well as that of other individuals connected to the women's movement who are too numerous to mention individually. 108 austerity and aboriginal communities | 207 austerity and aboriginal communities: an interview with david newhouse — carlo fanelli carlo fanelli1 (cf): the public service alliance of canada (psac) has suggested that the 2012 canadian federal budget “is true to conservative governments course of assimilating the aboriginal population by making life in aboriginal communities unbearable.”2 psac points to the fact that the budget has done little if nothing to address housing issues faced by indigenous peoples and is subsequently continuing a trend of inequality thereby subtly forcing indigenous communities to assimilate in attempts to escape impoverished conditions. to what extent would you agree with such a proposition? if so, in what ways is the current budget a continuation of past attempts to assimilate indigenous communities in canada? david newhouse3 (dn): the 2012 budget provides limited funding for services such as education and community infrastructure, primarily improvements to reserve water systems. there are no additional funds to address the chronic housing problems nor to assist those who wish to pursue post secondary education. as we all know, one of the keys to effective labour market participation is a high level of education. without adequate support for primary and secondary education, the graduation 1 carlo fanelli is a ph.d. candidate at the department of sociology & anthropology, carleton university, with interests in critical political economy, labour studies, canadian public policy, social movements, urban sociology and education. in addition to serving as editor of alternate routes: a journal of critical social research, his work has appeared in socialist studies, journal of critical education policy studies, new proposals: journal of marxism and interdisciplinary inquiry, as well as the bullet, mrzine and labor notes. 2 public service alliance of canada. (2012). impact of the 2012 budget on aboriginal peoples. http://www.psac-afpc.com/news/2012/issues/20120417-e.shtml 3 david newhouse is chair of the indigenous studies department, and associate professor of business administration at trent university. his works include improving the aboriginal quality of life: changing the public policy paradigm, from woundedness to resilience: urban aboriginal health, hidden in plain sight: aboriginal contributions to canada, not strangers in these parts: urban aboriginal peoples and well-being in the urban aboriginal community. 208 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism rate will not improve and without increased support for those who make it to post secondary education, fewer will be able to continue. the lack of adequate funding makes it difficult to break from the cycle of poverty that exists in many aboriginal communities. despite land claim agreements and other types of agreement, most researchers and policy analysts agree that the current level of funding is considerably below what is needed to close the gap in social and economic conditions between aboriginal peoples and canadians. the cuts to the aboriginal health organizations removes an important set of actors from the policy advice circle. at a time when all of the indicators tell us that increased attention to aboriginal health services are important, it doesn’t make sense to remove the source of advice that can assist in the effective and efficient spending of funding on aboriginal health. the removal of an independent aboriginal voice, effective to a modern canadian democracy, means that aboriginal people lose the ability to affect government policy and participate effectively in the design and delivery of their own programs in this extremely important area. as to the issue of assimilation, i think that this process is more complex. certainly governments can require certain types of organizational behaviours and structures from their funding partners but that doesn’t mean that aboriginal people are assimilated if they adhere to them. there is an incredible movement within aboriginal communities to use ideas, practices, theories, etc from our own intellectual heritage as the basis for everyday life, including organizational and community lives. what is important is that the thinking of organizational actors is aboriginal and that thought is translated into appropriate action. two of the foundational ideas of indigenous thought are transformation and adaptability. the truth test for indigenous knowledge is whether or not it works in real life; does it help one to survive? this allows for change and adaptation while remaining aboriginal. we see this in the remarkable resurgence of traditional ideas being brought back into everyday life. assimilation occurs when one stops thinking in aboriginal terms. i’ll tell you a story from one of my first year classes a decade ago. we were reading a paper on the introduction of iron pots into mi’kmaq culture in the 16th and 17th centuries. some of the non-indigenous students argued that the mi’kmaq should not have used the pots since it changed their way of life and was not ‘traditional.’ a mi’kmaq student in the class spoke up, after a lengthy debate: but we liked the pots. they austerity and aboriginal communities | 209 made life easier for us. using the pots didn’t make us any less mi’kmaq. they strengthened us by enabling us to do more things easier. my views on assimilation and that of the students were challenged and changed in this instant. the history of aboriginal people is filled with similar adaptations and yet we remain aboriginal (of all types). yes, life has changed and we have adapted, just like other cultures around the world. the real problem around assimilation is the homogenization that is occurring as a result of the dominance of north american modernity and the market, which are proving to be remarkably powerful forces. cf: recent focus on attawapiskat has caused much of the canadian public to become aware of the impoverished conditions apparent on a number of reserves and has highlighted the significant disparities in wealth and income between indigenous and non-indigenous communities. to some extent, this renewed interest in attawapiskat and elsewhere has compelled the canadian government to develop new strategies for tackling poverty amongst indigenous peoples both on and off the reserve. to what extent are these challenges rooted in the failure of earlier policies and have there been any major shifts in policy orientation? dn: the conditions that created attawapiskat-like situations are myriad and are rooted in canada’s colonial history, the indian act and government paternalism, the establishment of indian reserves outside the economic space of canada, the continued racism towards aboriginal peoples, and a lack of adequate funding for local government services including education and job training. in addition, the funding regulations for indian bands did not provide for much local discretion in shifting funds to meet local needs as they emerged and changed over the course of a funding cycle. while first nations councils now have some increases in flexibility and a higher modicum of local control, in reality, demands for higher level of accountability from governments (both federal and provincial) effectively remove this control and the cycle of colonial administration continues, albeit in a different guise. in the economic area, the focus is now on success and helping those who are most likely to be successful. the new aboriginal economic development framework is based on neo-liberal principles, providing assistance to those who need it least and leaving those who need it the most behind. we seem to be moving towards a policy that emphasizes the market as a primary vehicle for the way in which individuals participate in 210 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism society. the emphasis on individual participation is at odds with the collectivist nature of much of aboriginal society. it will be a challenge for aboriginal communities to develop institutions that can effectively mediate between these two approaches. without them, and lacking the high levels of education needed to effectively participate in the market, i have great fears that the economic and social divide will continue to widen. the playing field isn’t level yet. cf: although the 2012 budget has been presented as being focused on providing more educational opportunities for aboriginal children, the canadian coalition for the rights of children4 (ccrc) has argued that the budget fails to recognize the importance of early education and is ignoring the needs of canada’s youngest generation. although the government has assigned $275 million over three years for both literacy and for the building of new schools, do you think that they are failing to address the earlier educational needs of indigenous children? moreover, the funds have only been provided for elementary school education rather than high school or post-secondary education, so in addition to neglecting early educational needs it seems as if the government is also failing to encourage later educational opportunities. what might the consequences of this be both in the short and long term? dn: what we fail to recognize is that education is a system of institutions that include more than schools and local education programs. for the system to function well, all aspects of it need to well designed and adequately funded. funding for classroom teaching is important but also needs to be supplemented by other activities these days: local school boards/committees that bring local control and parents into governance activities of schools, breakfast and lunch programs for students who often come from low income families, academic assistance such as tutors, mentors and guidance counselors, important cultural elements such as elders, traditional teachers and language teachers which help to provide a sense of pride in one’s own heritage and culture. one also needs capital funding to ensure that schools are up to date and well maintained. learning in outdated schools or poorly maintained ones doesn’t do much to improve success. it is also important to have parents involved in meaningful ways in their children’s education. the consequences of not adequately funding edu4 canadian coalition for the rights of children. (2012). right in principle, right in practice. http://rightsofchildren.ca/wp-content/uploads/ccrc-report-to-un-on-crc.pdf austerity and aboriginal communities | 211 cation means lower graduation rates, lower labour force participation rates, lower incomes and an inability to contribute to canada at ones potential. as the aboriginal population grows, additional resources for social assistance are required, at funding levels higher than the cost of the initial educational investment. cf: the ccrc has also raised concern that the budget has allocated no new funds or resources to address youth rehabilitation. to the contrary, among prime minister stephen harper’s first tasks since gaining a majority government in 2011 has been to introduce bill c-10 which among other things eliminates conditional sentences for minor and property offenders and instead mandates mandatory minimum sentences. a plethora of research has shown that such an approach is not only counter-productive but actually intensifies the very problems they allegedly seek to solve.5 as a consequence, this has resulted in the canadian civil liberties association and canadian bar association, among other groups, opposing the implementation of such legislation.6 given that aboriginal youth make up only 5 percent of the overall canadian youth population but are disproportionately represented in canadian prisons at 28 percent of the population, what kind of impact will this lack of rehabilitative funds have on indigenous communities? does this threaten to further victimize the vulnerable? dn: the budget changes and bill c-10 make it likely that the level of incarceration of aboriginal youth will continue at its same level and even more likely that it will grow. the mandatory minimum sentences mean that more aboriginal youth (and others) will serve time; the loss of rehabilitative funds increases the possibility of re-offending upon release. one could analyze the effects through two lenses: the first is a loss of community productive capacity as a disproportionate number of aboriginal youth are removed; the second is through the lens of community safety as the cycle continues as youth return to communities after custody. the loss of funding for rehabilitative services also means a shift in philosophy away from restoration and rehabilitation towards deterrence and punishment. given the gains made over the last two decades in trying to bring aboriginal ideas into the justice system and the move towards restorative justice practices, it appears that the system would 5 for an introductory overview see barken, s.e. and g.j. bryjak. (2011). fundamentals of criminal justice: a sociological view, 2nd edition. toronto: jones and bartlett learning. 6 the ccla has called bill c-10 “unwise, unjust, unconstitutional.” see http://ccla.org/ omnibus-crime-bill-c-10/ 212 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism become less amicable to aboriginal peoples rather than more. cf: one of the most contentious issues emerging from the 2012 federal budget has been to grant the canada revenue agency and other federal departments the power to withdraw the tax-free status as well as government grants from charities that are involved in so-called political activities. environmental groups, in particular, have been singled-out by federal minister of the environment, peter kent, for having been accused of money laundering, illegal activities and ubiquitous with radicals and terrorists. given the intimate relationship between many indigenous communities and canadian charities, as well as efforts intent on, for instance, limiting the reckless development of the alberta tar sands, destructive resources extraction on first nations lands or broader issues related to climate change, how might such changes have potentially damaging affects for first nations communities and issues related to social justice? dn: as a society i think we have moved in a direction that criminalizes dissent. dissent itself is defined quite broadly as any criticism or opposition to the government positions. this is dangerous territory and goes against the foundations of an liberal democratic society. it creates a climate of fear where groups of citizens are unwilling to speak their mind and advance their views as part of the public policy process. since aboriginal peoples have been subject to public debate restrictions in the past and have successfully found ways to advance their views, i would anticipate that aboriginal leaders and organizations will continue to advance their views, even at the risk of having their funding cut or affairs investigated. threats of interrogation and the like have not been effective in the past at silencing aboriginal voices. there has been much effort at building alliances with non-aboriginal groups over the last few decades on social justice issues. i would forecast that the attempts at labeling criticism dissent would not be effective and might have the opposite effect of creating more alliance and more pointed criticism and action. the groups who might be most affected are those who have charitable status and who are engaged in advocacy work that is considered critical of government policy. cf: in from wounded to resilient, you argue that the indigenous community needs to become aware of the ongoing colonial discourse that constructs indigenous people as ‘wounded’, causes them to remain reliant and restricts their ability to become aware of their own agency. if i understand you correctly, you argue that a collective consciousness needs to be developed in austerity and aboriginal communities | 213 order for indigenous communities to see themselves as resilient. given the economic crisis and harper’s cuts to many social services that aboriginal and non-aboriginal communities often depend on in terms of health, welfare and so on, do you think that this process has been restricted? in your view has the economic crisis constrained this process of ‘healing’? how might these cuts have continued this notion of ‘woundedness’ or prevented indigenous communities from moving past this stereotype? dn: good question. will the reduction or loss of government funding stop the healing process? it may slow certain aspects of it down but i don’t think that it will be stopped as its essential core doesn’t depend upon government funding. the developing resilience i think will be able to find new ways to address some of the problems. my major concern is for those who are the most vulnerable and the most wounded who need specialized supports and attention. we seem to have forgotten about them and it is clear that the institutional support will not be available. aboriginal people have always lived in a polarized environment with sharp differences in economic and social conditions. reducing this distance is a national challenge which the state has been reluctant to take up, except on its own terms. aboriginal peoples have articulated over and over again what they believe needs to be done to reduce the economic and social distance as well as bring them into confederation. the best articulation of an aboriginal vision of canada is the final report of the royal commission on aboriginal peoples. it forms the foundation of contemporary aboriginal political action on many fronts. it’s aim is to reduce the polarization. the question in my own mind is whether or not canadians can deal with a ‘healed’ indian. so much of our public policy effort is based upon the notion of woundedness. this is not to say that there is not genuine poverty and social dislocation that needs addressing. can we support aboriginal led efforts as i believe that healing comes also from doing things for oneself. i was struck by the results of the environics urban aboriginal peoples study that indicated that 100 percent of those interviewed had experienced discrimination and racism in their lives and had to a large extent decided that there was nothing they could do about it and so were getting on with living with it.7 it was an astounding finding for the year 2011 but it is illustrative of the complex environment that we live in. a recent ipso-reid poll also showed that most canadians 7 environics. (2010). urban aboriginal peoples study. http://www.uaps.com 214 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism believe that aboriginal peoples get too much from government.8 a part of the issue as i see it changing the attitudes of non-aboriginal canadians so that they can find a way to live comfortably with us. cf: in an era of unprecedented austerity and continuing economic insecurity, what are some of the major challenges facing first nations communities that have yet to garner the serious media, academic and popular attention that is warranted? in what ways are health care, housing and other social services at risk of deteriorating? and why is the continuing study of first nations peoples central to improving the lives of both indigenous and non-indigenous communities? dn: what always strikes me is the fragility of some of the gains over the last two decades. it is clear that government funding for services and institutional development is important and critical to continued improvement in health, education and economic participation. without stable predictable funding for a set of societal institutions in these three areas it will be difficult to improve. the loss of national aboriginal health organization and the first nations statistical institute will be felt as they represent important sources of knowledge for policy makers in all foray. what many focus upon is only the delivery of services; what is missing is an understanding of the nature of the institutions that are necessary for direct support organizations to function. the issue of racism and its effects has been consistently ignored by researchers and governments as have urban issues (which are now slowly beginning to gain some attention). policy makers have consistently ignored urban aboriginal peoples until recently. research helps us to better understand the issues and to devise, hopefully, better policy and programming interventions. aboriginal leaders complain that their communities have been researched to death and that their interest in more in action than more research. and to some extent this is true. much of the research on aboriginal peoples has been performed by outsiders and directed towards improving the knowledge of outsiders. what is needed is more research that is undertaken on issues identified by aboriginal communities as important to them, undertaken by researchers working with them rather than for someone external and which helps local communities understand their situations better. the likelihood of improved local effort is much improved. 8 smith, teresa. (2012, june 30). canadians think government is too generous with aboriginals: poll. global news. http://www.globalnews.ca/canadians+think+government+is+too+generous+w ith+aboriginals+poll/6442671478/story.html 87 cutting government deficits: economic science or class war? hugo radice1 abstract: the financial crisis of 2008 was widely blamed on reckless and predatory behavior by the banks, and public debate therefore centred on supporting employment and reforming the financial system. but during 2010, the focus of attention has shifted to the deficits and debts of governments, which are widely believed to be excessive and unsustainable. it is argued here that cutting government deficits is not an economic necessity, but a strategy for justifying attacks on the living standards of workers and heading off reforms that might threaten the power of the dominant business and financial elites. keywords: public finances; keynesianism; neoliberalism; class rule introduction shortly before the british general election of 6 may 2010 an independent london economic policy think-tank, the institute for fiscal studies (ifs), called for the major parties to ‘come clean’ about their strategies for reducing the public sector debt, if elected to office (chote 2010). the ifs report resonated strongly with the overall public attitude towards the main political parties in the campaign: fuelled by the parliamentary expenses scandal that dominated british politics for much of 2009, many people had come to regard all politicians as devious and untrustworthy. the media response pandered to this attitude by unthinkingly echoing the ifs position. the centre-left guardian asserted that the ifs was “the leading economics think-tank” in the country, clearly implying that its views must be accepted without question. in this particular case that meant accepting not only that 1 life fellow, school of politics and international studies, university of leeds, leeds, u.k.; correspondence to h.k.radice@ leeds.ac.uk. this paper develops arguments originally presented in an article published in the bullet on 4 may 2010: see http://www.socialistproject.ca/bullet/350.php. cutting government deficits: economic science or class war? 88 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research the political parties had to be transparent, but also that the public sector debt had to be reduced. to any critical social scientist, such claims require substantiation. leaving aside the less contentious first claim, that political parties should be open about their intentions, the purpose of this paper is to examine the second claim. is cutting the public debt really an objective economic necessity, or is it actually a deeply political stance, reflecting the interests of business and financial élites? in the next section, i look at the historical reconfiguration of public finances over the last forty years, focusing on the shift during that period from post-war keynesian state interventionism to the neoliberal hegemony that characterizes the current economic policy landscape across the world. the following section then examines the contemporary debates over public sector deficits and sovereign debt, arguing that because of the global savings glut that has persisted right through the crisis that began in 2007, it is not ‘economically necessary’ to give immediate priority to cutting public deficits and debts. in the final section, i suggest that the real reason for the cuts is twofold. on the one hand, the business, financial and political élites—in short, the ruling classes— were obliged in 2008 to summon the interventionist state back onto the stage to avoid a total collapse of global finance, and now want to banish it once more to a merely supportive role. on the other hand, the cuts in state spending and increases in taxes are being structured in such a way as to transfer income and wealth from working people to the rich and powerful: ironically, this has now been authoritatively confirmed in a detailed study by the self-same ifs (browne, 2010). this combined attack, at once economic, political and ideological, requires a response that breaks decisively both with the easy compromises of social democracy, as well as with the unpalatable elitism of vanguard communism. the political economy of state spending in historical perspective over the last forty years, the theory and practice of economic policy has shifted markedly from mainstream post-war keynesianism to the unchallenged hegemony of free-market neoliberalism. although there have been many elements in this overall shift—notably privatization of state enterprises, deregulation of financial markets, the globalization of finance and attacks on trade union rights—public finances have consistently played a central role. continuing a long historical tradition, britain was a pioneer in this shift to neoliberalism. there were two key campaigns in particular that affected the uk: the first during the ‘stagflation’ crisis of the mid-1970s, and the second during the sharp recession of the early 1990s. 89 the 1970s and the rise of thatcherism through the 1950s and 1960s, economic growth in britain had been slower than in continental europe, let alone japan. in the 1970s, slow growth came to be accompanied by both high inflation and the return of mass unemployment, a combination that was completely at odds with conventional keynesian thinking at the time. a long decline of industrial employment in britain also accelerated in the 1970s. this ‘deindustrialization’ was blamed variously on poor business management, a national culture hostile to scientific and technical education, the continuing cost of empire, excessive investment abroad, or the obstructiveness of highlyorganized trade unions. attempts by successive governments to address these problems of decline started under the 1964-70 wilson administrations, and continued through the heath years to the return of labour in 1974. in the decade from 1964, restricting public spending might have been necessitated when sterling was under pressure, but it was not seen as the key to macroeconomic stability. instead, the predominantly keynesian policy mainstream favoured state initiatives in the form of income policies and indicative planning, aiming to reconcile the conflicting interests of employers and unions through the good offices of the state. however, by 1976 these efforts appeared to have failed, as inflation reached a record level of 26% even though unemployment remained stubbornly high—an unprecedented combination that came to be called ‘stagflation’. although keynesians tried to argue that the inflation was largely the result of international developments such as the breakdown of the dollar-gold link in 1971 and the oil shock of 1973, their policies were clearly in disarray. this led to the emergence of two policy platforms standing to left and right of the mainstream. on the left, labour and the unions flirted with an alternative economic strategy which centred on a radical extension of state intervention in the modernization of british industry (london cse group, 1980). on the right, the monetarist followers of milton friedman offered an equally radical diagnosis, blaming stagflation on the fiscal and monetary indiscipline of the government (laidler, 1982). while friedman’s followers argued that inflation was always due to excessive expansion of the money supply by the central bank, in britain bacon and eltis (1980) argued that alongside this, successive governments had ‘crowded out’ private economic activity through the excessive growth of the public sector. following a sudden dip in britain’s trade balance in 1976, a run on the pound forced chancellor healey to turn to the international monetary fund (imf) for help. the public spending cuts that followed signalled an early victory for the monetarist right, and the end of the road for both mainstream keynesianism and the leftist alternative economic strategy. thatcher’s election success in 1979, followed cutting government deficits: economic science or class war? 90 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research by reagan’s in the usa, signalled the return of pre-keynesian economic and social conservatism. in britain, the fierce monetary and fiscal squeeze that ensued put manufacturing to the sword, while the abolition of exchange controls allowed the burgeoning wealth from north sea oil to be invested largely abroad. trade union rights were severely restricted through a series of legislative measures. the breaking of the print unions by rupert murdoch and the defeat of the year-long miners’ strike of 1984-5 signalled an end to the power of organized labour. the second half of the 1980s saw an eventual revival in economic growth, which was widely seen as a triumph for thatcherism (coates and hillard, 1987). politically, that triumph was very well summed up by gamble (1988) as combining the free economy and the strong state: in order to liberate capital from the suffocating embrace of the state, it was necessary for the state itself to act decisively to restrict its own sphere of action. internationally there were soon clear parallels to the rise of thatcherism in britain. the bretton woods international monetary order, set up in 1944 and broadly inspired by keynes, had tied most currencies to the us dollar, which in turn had been tied to gold. the availability of temporary loans from the imf in principle gave governments the leeway to work out their own solutions to deficits in their balance of payments. this system had been abandoned in 1971-2, when the us no longer had the gold reserves to support it, and thereafter currencies were mostly allowed to float, meaning that their values were determined by international market forces. the revival of private international finance accelerated as a result of the massive 1973 rise in oil prices, when oil producers’ revenues were recycled as loans to oil-consuming countries. in 1979, president carter’s federal reserve chairman paul volcker attacked us inflation through a dramatic monetary squeeze, raising interest rates sharply and plunging the us into recession. this not only signalled a shift to monetarist economic policies in the us, but also directly contributed to the third world debt crisis of the 1980s. hit by falling export revenues and a rising cost of debt service from higher interest rates, many developing countries were forced to seek help from the imf and the world bank precisely when those bodies were themselves adopting the revived economic ideology of free markets and sound money. loans were only made available on condition of cuts in public spending and the liberalization of trade and finance, the new development policy that became known as the washington consensus (williamson, 1993). the triumph of neoliberalism – and globalization while the third world was devastated by the debt crisis of the 1980s (haggard & kaufman, 1992), the uk and us financial sectors pressed forward with deregulation at home and expansion abroad, laying the basis for their joint domination of global financial markets. however, by the end of the decade, the us 91 recovery under the reagan administrations ended in a major financial crisis centred on the savings and loan companies that traditionally provided residential mortgage loans. recovery in the uk centred on financial services, retail and property, generating a boom that led to renewed inflation and an unsustainable expansion of credit. meanwhile in japan too, a frenetic stock market and property boom led to a spectacular crash in 1987. when these developments culminated in a global financial bust in 1990-91, coinciding with the fall of communist regimes across the soviet bloc, the freemarket right once again blamed lax monetary policy and excessive public spending. within the european union, this resulted in the strictures of the maastricht treaty, first negotiated in 1991 and finally enacted, after some resistance, in 1993. in relation to public finance, from now on all eu member states were enjoined to limit their fiscal deficits to 3% of gdp, and their aggregate public debts to 60% of gdp. the free-market reforms that the washington consensus had imposed on the third world were now also imposed upon the post-communist ‘transition’ countries of eastern europe and the former soviet union. as a result, economic policy regimes across the world began rapidly converging on a single model, that of neoliberalism. within each country, this took the form of monetary and fiscal policies that prioritized open markets and low inflation, rather than full employment or the eradication of poverty. in the monetary field, the overriding purpose was to achieve a target rate of inflation. because banking and finance were both deregulated and internationally integrated, the money supply became almost impossible to measure, let alone control, and selective state intervention in credit markets was now ruled out. as a result, the rate of interest became the key policy instrument; if inflation exceeded its target, the central bank would raise the rate of interest charged to banks, and if it fell below, they would reduce it. meanwhile, the limits on public expenditure and government deficits not only brought to a halt the expansion of welfare states, but also accelerated the privatization of state-owned industries everywhere, most extensively in the excommunist countries. the wider political economy of neoliberalism centred on two significant processes through the 1990s. the first of these was financialization (epstein, 2005), in which capital accumulation shifts to the financial services sector from the production of other goods and services. while financial firms certainly took full advantage of the sector’s deregulation, the growth in financial markets and the development of new financial products was enthusiastically welcomed by businesses and households alike. for big business in particular, the 1990s saw a boom in mergers, buy-outs and restructuring, and the embedding of financial imperatives within the firm aimed at maximizing profits. this signalled an abrupt end to the more benign ‘managerial cutting government deficits: economic science or class war? 92 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research revolution’ of the post-war period, in which professional management and organized labour supposedly worked together in pursuit of growth, innovation and good working conditions. households, suffering from stagnation in earnings as a result of fierce competition in labour markets, began to pile up debt as they sought to maintain the growth in living standards to which they had become accustomed. unwittingly, they were being transformed from wage-earning workers into universal financial subjects, viewing the world in terms of investment opportunities and capital gains (radice, 2010b). the second important process of change was globalization, which became a dominant subject of study across the social sciences and in political and cultural discourse. after two decades of relative stagnation, the 1990s saw dramatic growth in trade and foreign direct investment (fdi) across all sectors of the economy and in all parts of the world. within the washington consensus, fdi was to replace publicly-funded aid programmes as the primary means of modernization and development, enabling ‘emerging economies’ to take advantage of trade liberalization by expanding their exports to the consumer markets of the rich countries. fdi was also central to the remarkable acceleration of economic growth in asia, especially the rise of china, and in latin america. by the end of the decade, the conventional perception on the left of a third world entirely and inevitably mired in poverty and stagnation had become seriously out of date. these twin processes strongly reinforced the transformation in economic policy regimes everywhere. globalization and financialization ensured that the state’s fiscal and monetary discipline was backed up by the mighty power of global credit markets. the capacity to withdraw funds from states backsliding on their commitment to neoliberalism was exemplified in the dramatic crises that hit mexico in 1994, many east asian countries in 1997, and russia in 1998. with active monetary and fiscal policies to pursue national economic goals now outlawed, the standard policy model became that of the ‘competition state’ (cerny 1997), seeking to attract inward investment flows to boost employment and exports, and to provide the ‘supply-side’ infrastructure for domestic businesses. although the turn of the millennium was accompanied by further outbreaks of financial crisis—for instance, the ‘dot.com’ stock-market bust and argentina in 2001—a new wave of global economic growth accompanied by low inflation appeared to justify the self-satisfied claim that ‘the ‘great moderation’ had arrived (bernanke, 2004). until 2007, the hegemony of neoliberalism seemed assured. the course of the crisis: government deficits and the bond markets the origins and course of the crisis that began in that year have by now generated a large literature (for a fuller account see radice, 2010b). the combination 93 of a long period of growth with exceptionally low interest rates had led to the over-selling of ‘sub-prime’ mortgages to poorer households in the usa, who were persuaded that ever-increasing house prices could provide economic security. like other forms of household loan, these mortgages were funded through securitization, issuing bonds whose value was based on the stream of expected mortgage payments. for the purchasers of such bonds, the risk appeared minimal, since each was based on a diversified bundle of mortgages, so that if some were to go into default, the rest would carry on generating income. in any case, the risk could also be laid off through a new form of insurance eagerly supplied by global investors—the credit default swap. through 2005-7, mortgage defaults climbed as interest rates rose, while both house prices and employment stalled, and it slowly became clear that the risk to the value of mortgage-backed securities had been drastically underestimated. as defaults increased, thousands of banks, insurance companies and other investors such as hedge funds found themselves facing potentially catastrophic losses. with the markets unable to arrive at any clear idea of the real value of trillions of dollars worth of financial assets, day-to-day lending transactions between banks ground to a halt, not just in the usa but around the world. during 2008, the entire global financial sector slid inexorably towards total breakdown. after the bankruptcy of lehman brothers in september 2008, governments began a hectic programme of concerted actions. these were aimed first at supporting the banks so that they could continue to manage the world’s monetary flows, and then, as a world recession rapidly set in, at sustaining aggregate demand. interest rates fell to near-zero and central banks pumped money into their economies. for the worst-hit countries, the imf organised rescues using the methods established in the 1980s third world debt crisis. the traditional g8 summits were hastily supplemented by larger g20 meetings, bringing china, india and brazil among others into the mix. global governance agencies, such as the bank for international settlements and the organization for economic cooperation and development, provided coordination and advice, and began the process of crafting regulatory reforms for the banking sector aimed at avoiding any repetition of the crisis. despite the obvious echoes of the global crisis of the 1930s, however, there has been no repetition, at least in the major capitalist nations, of the catastrophic rises in unemployment and falls in international trade that characterized that decade. this is surely partly due to the dense web of global governance institutions, which scarcely existed eighty years ago. the cooperative response has also reflected the dramatically greater extent of cross-border economic interdependence. however, the proximate reason is undoubtedly the adoption of massive fiscal stimulus packages, most notably in the usa and in china, but also in many other countries. the fiscal stringency of the maastricht treaty and the washington consensus was cutting government deficits: economic science or class war? 94 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research quickly abandoned from late 2008, with current budget deficits rising rapidly to levels ranging from 5% to 15% of gdp or more. however, through the second half of 2009 the tide of support for public intervention began to turn. precisely because the giant investment banks make their money from market-making and transactions, rather than loans and investments, their fortunes quickly recovered from the 2008 debacle, the supreme irony being the vast commissions they got for marketing the flood of new sovereign borrowing, and restructuring and refinancing busted large corporations like general motors. as credit markets began to function again, even the derided ratings agencies like moody’s, which had happily taken fat fees for doling out aaa ratings on sub-prime mortgage-backed securities, recovered their nerve and began to pronounce upon the sustainability of the much higher—and still rising—post-crisis levels of government debt. as the eurozone powers bickered over how to address greece’s fiscal crisis in late 2009, governments recently freed from the shackles of fiscal restraint found themselves once more on the defensive. how and why has this happened? it is striking that at no point in the past forty years of debate on public finances did the monetarist economists—or their neoliberal successors—explain why any particular limit to public deficits and debt was economically necessary. instead we have been offered, then as now, an entirely circular argument. we are told by supposed economic experts that deficit cuts are necessary because international bond markets require them. so why do the investors in international bond markets require cuts? because the economic experts say they are necessary! now it is certainly the case that any single government which accumulates debts that are very high compared to those of other governments will find itself subject to special scrutiny by the bond markets, as the greeks now know only too well, and as many third world governments found out already back in the 1980s. we should of course also make allowance for the pernicious effects of speculators: for instance, the role of george soros in britain’s 1992 crisis that forced it out of the european union’s exchange rate mechanism, or the flight of ‘hot money’ from east asia in 1997. but a reasonable case can still be made that governments should, in normal times, avoid excessive reliance on borrowing, especially to fund current expenditure as opposed to capital investments. however, from the standpoint of macroeconomic stability, and especially that of maintaining full or near-full employment, our overriding concern today should remain that of keynes: the need for governments to sustain economic activity at a time when savings in the private sector greatly exceed investments. this need is met by absorbing excess savings through the sale of government securities, the proceeds of which are then spent so as to sustain aggregate output and employment. 95 there are however big differences in the nature of capitalism today, compared to the 1930s when keynes first made the case for counter-cyclical public spending. in 1933, after the failure of yet another international conference aimed at coordinating responses to the crisis, keynes reluctantly made the case for a national solution led by the state. as a lifelong liberal, he rejected both the soviet experiment of central planning, and the emerging nazi model of extreme economic nationalism under the joint dictatorship of capital and the state. from then on, he consistently argued that international capital movements should be tightly restricted, so that governments could fully exercise the control over national financial markets that they acquired through the sheer scale of their borrowing and their control of the money supply (radice, 1988). but precisely as a result of the combined processes of deregulation, financialization and globalization discussed earlier, governments no longer have this degree of structural power over finance. in addition, for decades now, massive imbalances in international trade between countries have been sustained, with the huge trade surpluses of japan, germany, and now china being matched by the huge deficits of the usa and britain. these trade imbalances are by definition offset by capital flows from surplus to deficit countries, and these flows—as well as the financing of expanded trade—have been a major feature of financial globalization. as a result the keynesian premise, of the state’s structural power over finance, can only be fully applied collectively at the global level. state power over finance could only be re-established within a single country by a radical disengagement from the world economy, but given the economic and political resources invested in building the global economy and its neoliberal order, the cost of doing so would be immense. adopting this approach, we can see that the continued growth and prosperity of countries with chronic trade surpluses, like germany and china, depend, in conditions of global recession, on the willingness of other countries like the usa and britain to continue to run trade deficits. as a corollary—and this is really an economic fact—there will be continuing matching outflows of capital from the former countries, and inflows into the latter. given the current reluctance of businesses and households in the trade-deficit countries to borrow and spend, it is their government borrowing that keeps the world economy going. and the very fact that so many governments have been able to borrow so much since 2008 shows that, despite the global recession, there remains a global savings glut. this savings glut has arisen because of the massive shift from wages to profits, and from the closely-related subordination of hundreds of millions of peasants and independent producers to wage labour in those ‘emerging’ economies. as states have abandoned their earlier commitment to the fiscal mitigation of inequality, the wealthy have increased their grip on global savings. cutting government deficits: economic science or class war? 96 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research as long as those savings continue to exceed global private sector investments, governments must continue to absorb that excess. otherwise, the world economy will slip back into the famous ‘double-dip’ recession, a prospect that has become increasingly likely through the summer of 2010. indeed, as and when the global recovery has reached the point where private sector investment has substantially recovered and cyclical unemployment has disappeared, why should ‘the markets’ require a reduction of government deficits to ‘normal’ levels? there is, after all, no economic law that dictates a 3% cap on the government deficit, and 60% on debt, or indeed any other numerical values. the level of aggregate economic activity is entirely unaffected by the proportion of demand that flows through the public rather than the private sector. as real interest rates swing back to being moderately positive, the power of compound interest is surely enough to sustain the economic advantage of the rich, as well as the pensions of the middle classes. resolving the crisis: restoring class rule in the end, now as in the 1970s, the real reason for the attacks on state borrowing and state expenditure lies not in economics, but in politics, or more specifically in class warfare. for it is primarily through the politics of democracy—even our highly restricted form of it—that the privileged position of private wealth has historically come under threat. after 1945 the propertyless in most parts of the world, west, east and south, made remarkable gains in their well-being and in the strength of their political voice. by the mid-1970s, the propertied classes—whether capitalists, usurers, merchants or landlords, or indeed the soviet-bloc bureaucratic élite—found themselves on the defensive on many fronts. many radical nationalist governments in the third world continued to press for reforms in the governance of the world economy, challenging the new forms of economic colonialism that followed independence (biel, 2000, ch.6). in the soviet bloc, the 1968 prague spring and the first stirrings of the polish workers’ movement in 1970 threatened the bureaucrats’ highly centralised power (harman, 1974). and in the west, not only had new social movements challenged the elites on issues of gender, race and the environment, but workers were also advancing new claims to workplace democracy and economic security that seriously threatened the power of big business and high finance (e.g. rowbotham, segal and wainwright, 1979; gorz, 1985). the previous two sections charted the rise of neoliberalism with a particular focus on public finances. with the benefit of hindsight, the historical logic of that rise seems all too apparent. but the political articulation of an effective response by the ruling classes to the combined challenges of the 1970s was by no means clear at the time. for more than thirty years, the ideologues of neoliberalism, with econo97 mists at the fore, worked assiduously to construct a new common-sense about the economy based on the old liberal mantra: property rights, individualism and the residual state. yet they were constantly faced with resistance, not only from the diverse forces of the left, seeking to at least defend the post-war gains of workers, but also from political strands of the right: nationalism, religious authoritarianism, and even, in parts of the global south, the traditional paternalism that remained from the rule of precapitalist landed interests (barrington moore, 1966). karl polányi (1944) had argued that the nineteenth-century liberal utopia of a market society had historically foundered on the social consequences of subordinating not only produced commodities, but also land, labour and money, to the market—in marx’s terms, to the rule of capital. the result was a historical ‘double movement’: first towards the market society, and then towards social protection. by the turn of the millennium, the restructuring of the state, the redistribution of income and wealth to the rich, and the removal of workers’ collective rights had seemingly turned the tide once more towards the market society. yet in 2007-9, the crisis immediately led to widespread public challenges to the neoliberal order, and the ruling classes were obliged to tear up the neoliberal rulebook in favour of vigorous state intervention. perhaps this heralded the second phase of a new polányian double movement, as hettne (1997) had argued a decade earlier (for a sceptical view see wade, 2010). but as we have seen, within about six months the neoliberals regrouped. in britain, as the debate over labour’s 2009 budget already showed, their ownership of the economic common sense allowed them to steadily shift the focus of debate from exacting retribution and repayment from the banks, to blaming governments for assuming the vast fiscal deficits that have kept capitalism afloat. meanwhile, those who spoke up for real alternatives—for green new deals, for radical reform of the banks, for a new international financial architecture—have been pushed to the margins of public attention. the immediate need, at this juncture, is for the left to continue to make the case for maintaining public expenditure, supporting the efforts of keynesian economists such as paul krugman, robert reich and joseph stiglitz in the us, or david blanchflower and robert skidelsky in britain. across the eu, the progressive economists of the euromemorandum group (2009) have argued this case, and even the international monetary fund has argued that “growth prospects in advanced economies could suffer if an overly severe or poorly planned fiscal consolidation stifles still-weak domestic demand” (imf, 2010, p. 7). however, it is becoming increasingly clear that this is by no means enough, because it takes the easy course of looking back at how the world was before neoliberalism—and often doing so through rose-tinted glasses. james ferguson (2010) argues, in relation to the global south, that returning to the alternative of the decutting government deficits: economic science or class war? 98 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research velopmental state is not enough because the building-blocks of politics—workers, markets, nation-states—have been so fundamentally reconfigured by neoliberal restructuring. in the context of a realistic appreciation of these changes, we can see that the assault on public spending goes far beyond the simple matter of the macroeconomic management of effective demand. in this respect, britain is leading the way, as has so often been the case historically. following the election on 6 may 2010, a coalition government was unexpectedly formed between the conservative party under david cameron, which had won the largest number of seats but not an overall majority, and the much smaller liberal democrats under nick clegg, which had widely been assumed to favour a centre-left coalition with labour. on 22 june, the coalition announced an emergency budget, setting out savage cuts in public spending of up to 25% in all areas except health and overseas aid” (for details see radice, 2010a). however, as government ministers began to detail their substantive plans for the years ahead, it quickly became clear that the immediate macroeconomic consequences were only one issue for the government’s critics. in the key areas of health, education and welfare, the coalition intends a far more radical assault on the nature of the state and its relation to society. this assault is not only aimed at deepening the neoliberal restructuring of institutions, but also at banishing the very idea that societal goals can be advanced through the collective state provision of public goods. the message is relentlessly driven home, that the coalition wants to ‘restore power to the people’, linking service provision directly to clients and engaging the public actively in the substantive shaping of that provision. in historical terms, this is taking britain back not merely to the era before the post-1945 welfare state, but to before the liberal reforms of the early 20th cent ury. however, in every respect the coalition is cleverly building upon initiatives and perceptions already established not only by the tory administrations from 1979 to1997, but also under new labour from 1997 to 2010. new labour dropped the tory experiment under which family doctors commissioned specialist medical services; but in opting for an indirect commissioning model via local bureaucracies under central state control, they ensured that the nhs would still be driven by financial motives and managed along private-sector lines. in education, new labour persistently undermined democratic local control through central initiatives and through the creation of specialist academies at the secondary level. and in welfare, despite some successful initiatives aimed at tackling child poverty, they pursued ‘modernization’ and ‘value for money’ programmes that did nothing to break the weary cycles of poverty and welfare dependency in which so many millions were trapped. however, at a deeper level the neoliberal project is also about reshaping the very nature of citizenship, the way in which individuals imagine and live their relations with each other and with social institutions. in the post-war period, it was generally 99 taken for granted that these relations were shaped by institutions structured around class interests: trade unions, professional associations, and political parties whose ideologies reflected the interests of capital or labour. today, any such concept of class as a mediating force has been expunged from public discourse. on the left, the retreat from statism (social-democratic or communist) led in the 1990s to the famous ‘third way’ of giddens (1999), and the search for progressive elements in ‘civil society’ and ‘social movements’. on the right, the currently-fashionable british ‘red tory’ thinker philip blond (2010) argues that the modern citizen can be mindful of social needs and active in ensuring their provision, while still responding to market signals in the more narrowly economic sphere. the consequence is to deprive anyone seeking to pursue traditional progressive goals of equality, solidarity and sustainable livelihoods of the potential for a collective response to neoliberalism. so can the concept of class be resuscitated? in marx’s work in particular, class is a relational concept centred on the way in which society’s material reproduction is ensured. under capitalism, the predominant but by no means exclusive form of this is capitalist production, based on the separation of the majority from direct appropriation of the means of production. this separation divides society into workers and capitalists, with the many and varied strata of society comprehensible only in terms of their standing in relation to that fundamental division. neoliberalism has developed a double denial of the significance of class division in this sense, building upon the dominant theoretical traditions of mainstream sociology. first, class is redefined empirically in terms of the detailed differentiation of income levels and occupations in society, whose multiple groups are then aggregated into ‘working class’ and ‘middle class’. many marxists have been drawn into this position, accepting the divide between the two, and arguing only that elements of this middle class could still challenge the rule of capital, either in conjunction with or in place of the industrial working class (walker, 1979; for a general review of ‘new class’ theories see king & szelényi, 2004). but as long as the main axes of differentiation are rooted in the production of goods and services as commodities, the common subordination to the dynamics of capitalist accumulation ensures common experiences that potentially unite these supposedly separate ‘classes’, however elusive this unity may have become (meiksins, 1986). the second denial addresses this problem directly, by positing other systematic determinants of the relation between individual and society, firmly based outside the realm of production. this has also been a perennial feature of mainstream sociology, but in recent decades it has been fuelled by the universal rejection of most varieties of marxism for their ‘economic determinism’. twentieth-century marxism, from gramsci to poulantzas and on, had in many respects accepted the criticism, downcutting government deficits: economic science or class war? 100 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research playing the analysis of ‘economic’ production relations in favour of an approach in which ‘the political’ is constituted as ‘relatively autonomous’. but equally, since the 1970s much of the left has rejected ‘class politics’—interpreted narrowly as the sectional interests of the traditional male industrial working class—in favour of the ‘rainbow politics’ of social movements, rooted in the different, supposedly more authentic needs of particular social groups. it seems clear that the rejection of class politics goes hand in hand with the view that economic activity really is constituted separately from other aspects of life in capitalist societies, including politics. however, such a view is at the very core of liberalism as a political ideology. for if the economic is really separated from the political, then its regulation can and should lie outside the realm of political action. in other words, the institution of private property cannot be politically challenged, and property rights cannot be subordinated to human or civil rights in forms such as ‘the right to livelihood’. it is precisely in order to develop a substantive underpinning for this proposition that neoliberalism now seeks to redefine the individual in effect as a capitalist, an economic subject whose engagement with others is mediated by the market, and structured by the accumulation of private capital. since it is self-evident that the great majority of individuals are not ‘capitalists’ in marx’s sense—possessing a sufficient mass of money-capital that can generate at least a subsistence income— they are, instead, seen as capable of accumulating ‘human’ or ‘social’ capital (fine, 2010), the possession of which enables them in principle to acquire money capital. yet they can only do that through the sale of their labour-power—in other words, through wage labour, as members of the working class. in order to escape from the trap that neoliberalism is now springing the left needs to reassert the class nature of capitalism in these terms, albeit without in any sense denying the political significance of other forms of oppression. in a letter to marx, engels (1858) famously quipped that “the english proletariat is actually becoming more and more bourgeois, so that the ultimate aim of this most bourgeois of all nations would appear to be the possession, alongside the bourgeoisie, of a bourgeois aristocracy and a bourgeois proletariat”. the reality is that britain is the most proletarian of nations, in terms of the proportion of its population who rely on wage-labour for their subsistence: there are no peasants left, and small-business capitalism has always been feebler than in other capitalist countries. by recognizing such foundations in present-day economic reality, it may yet prove possible to build a movement of universal appeal that can challenge the class rule of capital. 101 references bacon, r. and eltis, w. (1980). britain’s economic problem: too few producers. london: macmillan. barrington moore, j. r. (1966). social origins of dictatorship and democracy: lord and peasant in the making of the modern world. boston: beacon press. bernanke, b. (2004). ‘the great moderation’. speech to the eastern economic association, 20 february 2004. see http://www.federalreserve.gov/boarddocs/speeches/2004/20040220/default. htm. biel, r. (2000). the new imperialism: crisis and contradictions in north/south relations. london: zed press. blond, p. (2010). red tory: how left and right have broken britain and how we can fix it. london: faber. browne, j. et al. (2010). ‘the distributional effects of tax and benefit reforms between june 2010 and april 2014: a revised assessment’. institute for fiscal studies briefing note bn108, 25 august, available at www.ifs.org.uk/publications/5246. cerny, p. (1997). ‘paradoxes of the competition state: the dynamics of political globalization’. government and opposition 32(1), 251-74. chote, r. et al. (2010). ‘filling the hole: how do the three main uk parties plan to repair the public finances?’. institute for fiscal studies 2010 election briefing note no.12, 27 april, available at www.ifs.org.uk/publications/4848. coates, d. and hillard, j. (eds) (1987). the economic revival of modern britain: the debate between left and right. aldershot: edward elgar. engels, f. (1858). letter to marx of 7 october 1858, in marx-engels collected works 40, 343. epstein, g. (ed) (2005). financialization and the world economy. cheltenham: edward elgar. euromemorandum group (2009). europe in crisis: a critique of the eu’s failure to respond. at http://www.lwbooks.co.uk/ebooks/euromemorandum%202009-2010.pdf. ferguson, j. (2010). ‘the uses of neoliberalism’. antipode 41(s1), 166-84. fine, b. (2010). theories of social capital: researchers behaving badly. london: pluto press. gamble, a. (1988). the free economy and the strong state: the politics of thatcherism. london: macmillan. giddens, a. (1999). the third way: the renewal of social democracy. cambridge: polity press. gorz, a. (1985). paths to paradise: on the liberation from work. boston: south end press. cutting government deficits: economic science or class war? 102 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research harman, c. (1974). bureaucracy and revolution in eastern europe. london: pluto press. haggard, s. and kaufman, r. (eds) (1992). the politics of economic adjustment. princeton: princeton up. hettne, b. (1997). ‘development, security and world order: a regionalist approach’. european journal of development research 9(1), 83-106. international monetary fund (2010). world economic outlook update. 7 july, at http://www.imf. org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2010/update/02/pdf/0710.pdf. king, l.p. and szelényi, i. (2004). theories of the new class: intellectuals and power. minneapolis: university of minnesota press. laidler, d. (1982). monetarist perspectives. oxford: philip allan. london cse group (1980). the alternative economic strategy: a response by the labour movement to the economic crisis. london: cse books. meiksins, p. (1986). ‘beyond the boundary question’. new left review 157, 101-20. polányi, k. (1944). the great transformation: the political and economic origins of our times. beacon hill: beacon press. radice, h. (1988). ‘keynes and the policy of practical protectionism’, in j. v. hillard (ed), j. m. keynes in retrospect. aldershot: edward elgar, 153-71. radice, h. (2010a). ‘britain’s austerity budget: a class act’, the bullet 385. at http://www.socialistproject.ca/bullet/385.php. radice, h. (2010b). ‘confronting the crisis: a class analysis’. socialist register 2011, forthcoming. rowbotham, s., segal, l. and wainwright, h. (1979). beyond the fragments: feminism and the making of socialism. london: merlin books. wade, r. (2010). ‘is the globalization consensus dead?’. antipode 41(s1), 142-65. walker, p. (ed.) (1979). between labour and capital. brighton: harvester press. williamson, j. (1993). ‘democracy and the “washington consensus”’. world development 21(8), 1329-36. 103 toward a marxist theory of transition chuck smith this essay attempts to do two things: 1) to familiarize the reader with certain theoretical concepts (problematic, mode of production, social formation, historical conjuncture, class struggle; 2) to further the process of theorization of these concepts in order that they may be further elaborated and more fruitfully applied to the study and propagation of large scale social change. such an approach is utilized by the writer as the method of theoretical analysis in the study of colonial social formations. the basic thesis i wish to put forward is that, the elaboration of the concepts mode of product ion, social formation and class struggle will lead to the building up of an adequate conceptual framework for understanding and changing man's social relations. the key concepts mode of production and social formation are formulated and utilized in such varied ways that they often have very different meanings. this is not merely a matter of 'semantics' since these varied conceptualizations often lead to radically different theories and practises in determinate concrete situations, rather than being a question of semantics this is a theoretical divergence which at least in the first instance centers on what althusser calls problematics. that is the underlying structure of knowledge which renders possible the raising of certain questions in a particular form while ruling out certain other questions as unsuitable. to ask questions (even the right ones) is not the same as answering them. yet one's theoretical perspective is very much a reflection of one's problematic. following from this, the main questions i wish to raise, concern the theoretical status of the concept mode of production and the manner in which it exists in actu within concrete social formations given, specific conditions of existence (material conditions) and specific class struggle or class struggles, social relations and a specific historical conjuncture. within the context of modes of production it seems that many of the varying positions and differences of opinion arise precisely from the manner in which the concept is employed and 104 questions are posed. as cardoso points out, marx, from whom the concept mode of production is derived was himself less than instructive since he used "mode of production" ambiguously encompassing at least three distinct meanings (with possible combinations): the first refers in a descriptive way simplyto ways of producing; the second to a series of modes of production which become dominant in particular regions and periods and which define "progressive epochs" in the evolution of history (e.g. feudalism and capitalism); and thirdly, secondary modes of production which never become dominant "e.g. petty bourgeois modes, peasant small-holding modes". one can clearly recongize all three tendencies in marx but i do not agree with cardoso's conclusion that one must move from such a categorization to the concrete study of the evolutionary process of the totality of the european mediterranean area in order to tathom capitalism as the first universal mode of production which then dissolves previous modes of production." rather i believe one must begin with a reading which spells out the relation between the whole and its parts , as althusser proposes in this case between a dominant and other modes of production. before doing so, it is necessary to provide a definition of a mode of production at the most abstract level. i believe that with some modifications the basic problematic proposed by balibar can be retained. following the classic althusserian conception one can discern a pattern of invariants encompassing: 1) labourer (always labour power within the cm. p.); 2) means of production (the object and instruments [means} of labour) 3) non-labourer (appropriating surplus value in one or more of its component parts). these invariants are held together by two connections (relations), 1) relations of real appropriation, and 2) relations of property. the former refers to the appropriation of nature by man, or the real material appropriation of the means of production by the producer in the labour process, i.e. the production process. this concept approximates the classical marxist notion of forces of production encompassing raw materials and other subjects of labour, the labour process and object of labour (commodities) but explicitly manifests effects on the other (superstructural) elements. within the context used relation 1) also refers to the ability and skill of the non-worker appropridting surplus to set the labour process in motion. 105 the latter (property) relation in the combination, refers to more than legal property, rather it includes use/enjoyment as well as (legal) "property strictly speaking", the process of exploitation of labour within the ensemble of social and technical relations. it approximates relations 3 of production, as used in capital . balibar then goes on to complete the picture by introducing the concept of determination in the last instance by the economy. of the three inter-related structures, (otherwise called levels, elements , instances or moments ) economic, political-legal, ideological the economy is determinant in that it determines which of the instances of the social structure occupies the dominant place. dominance refers back to althusser's definition of over-determination... "it is the manifestation of the structure in dominance that unifies the whole. this reflection of the conditions of existence of the contradiction within itself, this reflection of the structure articulated in dominance that constitutes the unity of the complex whole within each contradiction , this is the most profound characteristic of the marxist dialectic." 5 the structure in dominance then provides the main determinant of the effectivity of material conditions and defines the primary conditions of existence of class struggle and other social forms. determination in the last instance, must be interpreted as determination by 'economic' material conditions, through a dominant instance. as balibar states in his self criticism. "the economic aspect (the 'economic' class struggle) is only one of these aspects cof class struggle], unevenly developed, unevenly decisive according to historical conjunctures, and never capable of producing revolutionary effects by itself . which by no means rules out , but on the contrary demands that in all historical periods , whatever the dominant mode of production and whatever the conjuncture, the ensemble of the class struggle is still determined by the 'economic' material conditions. "^ that is, the structures, define the conditions of existence of a class struggle which expresses an effectivity at the level of a transformation of the structures. change is never necessary in a teleological sense but 106 mutually conditioned and determined by the ongoing process of the structures combined with the specific events of class struggle. as pouiantzas points out each structure operates in its own connected yet distinct 'region' of practise, within a mode of production. the political exists as a specific level but also as the crucial level in which the contradictions of a social formation are reflected and condensed. political practise has as its specific object the present moment, the nodal point where the contradictions of the various levels of a formation are condensed in the complex relations governed by overdetermination and by their dislocation and uneven development. the problem of state power arises inside the structure of several levels dislocated by uneven development. the state has the particular function of constituting the factor of cohesion between the levels of a social formation. the struggle for control of the state, class struggle, operates along complex lines of development. following gramsci, pouiantzas posits dominant classes with specific hegemonic fractions engaged in compromises and power alliances with popular classes and fractions, whose power is reflected in ideological and repressive state apparatuses, generally reflected by the reigning class (upper levels of the state and corporate bureaucratic hierarchy) and manifested in all the structural levels especially ideology. for pouiantzas, unlike gramsci, agents are tied to the reproduction of the positions occupied by a social class. "we are faced with a series of relations between apparatuses, whose roots are deep in the class struggle. in other words the primary distribution of agents is tied to the primary reproduction of the positions occupied by social classes. according to the stages and phases of the social formation, that primary distribution assigns to a given apparatus or series of apparatuses its own proper role which it is to play in distributing agents."' during a revolutionary conjuncture or period of transition the possibility exists for radical changes in the primary distribution of agents and the role of the various apparatuses in the distribution of agents may in fact be drastically altered or in extreme cases the apparatuses themselves eliminated. 107 further elaboration of the concept of mode of production can now be made on the basis of these formulations. hindess and hirst very clearly define the structure of the unity of the two relations (property and real appropriation). they define mode of production as an articulated combination of relations of production and forces of production structured 8 by the dominance of relations of production. relations of production, define a specific mode of appropriation of surplus labour and the specific form of social distribution of the means of production corresponding to that mode of appropriation of surplus labour. furthermore the distribution of agents to the positions labourer/non-labourer is seen as a function of the social distribution of the means of production. in fairness to hindess and hirst they do not attempt to do this outside of their rather inclusive study of specific modes of production. hindess and hirst specifically define forces of production as the subject of work (raw materials, etc.), the labour process (personal activity of man) and its instruments. this is a vast inprovement over the all too prevalent ambiguity in the use of the term production by many marxists. for example "pierre-philippe rey quotes a passage from marx wherein the term production is used in a context referring to mode of production. this is not clear in rey's presentation where this term might easily be mistaken for productive forces. "in all forms of society, it is a determined production and the relations engendered by it which assigns to all other productions and relations engendered by them, their level and their importance. "9 similarly terray even more incorrectly posits that the instruments of labour are determinant in the enumeration and identification of the indices of a mode of production present, i.e. the order of investigation hindess and hirst wisely ignore terray' s formulation and extend that of rey to preclude any definition of forces of relations of production independently of the mode of production in which they are combined. yet despite their apropos criticisms of certain technicist notions, hindess and hirst carry their articulated combination of forces and relations of production too far, i.e. to the point of denying the specific effectivity of forces of production 108 as a social relation. in their attempt to deduce the productive forces from the concept of mode of appropriation, hindess and hirst establish a direct relationship between mode of appropriation, dominant instance and class struggle which bypasses the forces of production subsumed in this articulated combination, and denegates the labour process. in such a forroalistic deductive connection the possibility of a contradictory relation between the forces and relations of production virtually disappears in the articulated combination such that it is hard to envisage how such a construct can avoid reproducing its conditions of existence. ** more will be said on this in relation to the question of transition and class struggle. to avoid possible ambiguities it is necessary to clearly define relations of production. as mentioned such a definition must include appropriation of the product or some portion of it by the labourer and appropriation of the surplus labour by the non-labourer. following poulantzas . relations of production in class society, can be viewed as a double relation encompassing man's relations to nature in material production. "these two relations are relations first between men and other men class relations, and secondly between the agents of production and the object and means of labour the productive forces. these two relations thus concern the relation of the non-worker (the owner-director) to the object and means of labour. these relations involve two aspects (a) economic ownership: by this is meant the real economic control of the means of production, i.e. the power to assign the means of production to given uses and so to dispose of the products obtained (b) possession: by this is meant the capacity to put the means of production into operation."12 ernesto laclau, posits a similar hierarchical definition of a means of production as an "integrated complex of social productive forces and relations linked to a determinate type of ownership of the mean^ of production ownership of means of production are essential relations among the ensemble of relations of production. logically and mutually co-ordiri one will be able to discern quite clearly the presence of essential elements of two distinct modes of production. in such cases the dominant mode of production is demarcated by its more or less hegemonic control of productive property and productive relations albeit often in rather bastardized forms. such articulated modes ay in fact be particularly resilient and long lasting. in the case of domestic manufacture predominating in a social formation one finds predominant capitalist freehold property, bourgeois law combined with artisanal production carried out by direct producers (perhaps cottars) still in possession of most of their own means of production and a situation where merchants and usurers capital fulfills the directive functions and mediates between production and exchange. such social formations (common in eighteenth century europe) are not yet entirely capitalist, in fact metayage may still exist in widespread form, but they are for the most part dominated by capitalist institutions (even if sometimes of a perfunctory nature) capitalist relations of production and a capitalist state i.e. one controled primarily in the interests (if not by) a bourgeoisie. i would characterize 12? such a conjuncture as capitalist at the point at which the predominant mode of appropriation of surplus takes place within predominantly capitalist relations of exchange and social relations. the actual forms that the transformation of productive and corresponding superstructural relations take depend on specific internal and external contradictions of the the social formation delineating its conditions of existence and the actual course of class struggle witnin such prescribed limits. the third transitional conjuncture involves a multiplicity of more than two modes and forms of production which can again be expressed in terms of dominance set by the economic level but where direct state intervention would seem to be necessary to stabilize such a complex articulation in order that the dominant relations of production might reproduce themselves. for example in 192i lenin periodized soviet russia in terms of five separate modes and forms of production wherein the collective ownership of the means of production provided the determinant level but one which could only structure articulation of the social formation through the state and political practise. multiple contradictions within the varied elements existed which could have possibly served to undermine socialism of various points, one could in fact argue that this is what happened under stalin. but at any rate the main, point i wish to make is only that new productive forces were not immediately forthcoming as an inevitable result of changed relations production. such correspondance can only come about through struggle at the level of all existing social relations which is necessary because the outcome of such struggle while prescribed within certain limits is in no way pre-determined in any strict sense. in summary then actual transition does not constitute a new separate mode of production but a dislocated state of an articulated combination of modes of production (diachrony) where one mode is dominant. in practise the boundaries can be obscure, capricious and relatively undefined, but i prefer this uncertainty to positing a transitional mode which undermines mode of production as a theoretical concept. in concrete terms the actual transition is defined by a non-inevitable class struggle between the major 128 classes and fractions so the co-existing modes and forms of production which takes place at different levels and reflects the structural and superstructural totality. the state manifests itself as the region of condensation of the levels, but control of the state does represent a complex and possibly long and arduous accession to power. a further problem involves the generally contradictory nature of articulation of m.p.'s. can synchrony as a concept exist outside of tendencies toward transition? the answer i believe does not lie simply within the realm of theory. as i have said transition depends on determinate class struggle within the structural complexity of a mode of production or more generally a social formation. unique circumstances with their own causal specificity and relative autonomy play an important part at the level of concrete conjunctures. it is at this level that factors such as geography, climate, demography, personality, etc. come into play. they are never isolated from the structural complexity but neither are they simply or unilaterally determined by it or subsumed within it. thus the concrete conjuncture must be separated from social formation as a threoretical construct and should be seen not merely as possible outcomes predetermined by the structures but also as outcomes derived from the give and take of actual class struggle. 129 footnotes 1. callinicos, n., althusser 's marxism , p. 34, pluto fress , london, 1976. 2. cardoso, c.f.s., "colonial modes of production", critique of anthropology , nos. 4 and 5, autumn, 1975. 3. balibar, etienne in reading capital (b. brewster, trans), new left books, london, 1970. althusser, louis, pages 209-253. 4. another level theoretical is sometimes introduced but for methodological reasons beyond this essay i reject althusser 's distinction between theory and ideology and thus i leave it out for my purposes here. my reasons for doing so are grounded in what 1 take to be althusser 's fundamental demarcation of scientific work as the activity of generality ii, theoretical concepts on generality i ideological representations. for example marx's concept of mode of production could be applied to the representations of a particular social formation to produce scientific theory. whether this theory would have a specific effectivit^y from the ideological instance and thus would constitute a transformative element cannot be posited in a mechanical fashion and would very much depend upon the particular historical conjuncture, and it is the conjuncture which is at issue here. if as althusser maintains "the knowledge effect is the appropriation of the real object" then the real object of revolutionary theory must be revolutionary politics and the two cannot be separated as althusser would at times maintain. 5. balibar, e. , op. cit ., p. 224. althusser, l. for marx , allen lane, (b. brewster, trans), 1969, p. 200. 6. balibar, etienne, "self criticism: an answer to questions from 'theoretical practise"' in theoretical practise , no. 7/8 january 1973. 7. poulantzas, nicos, folitical power and social classes (t. o'hagan, trans), new left books, london, 1973, 12, 13, 40, 42, "on social classes", new left review , p. 54. 8. hindess, b. hirst, p.q., pre-capitalist modes of production , routledge and kegan paul, london, 1375, p. 125. 9. rey, pierre-philippe, les alliances de classes , my translation, p. 22, maspero, paris, 1973. 10. cf. balibar, e., in althusser and balibar, op. cit. , 1970, p. 235. 11. gareth stedman-jor.es, "modes of production workshop", communist university of cambridge, april, 25, 1976. 12. poulantzas, niccs, "cn social classes", p. 28, new left feview , no. tj-. 13. laclau, ernesto, "feudalism and capitalism in latin america, new left review , no. 67, kay-june, 1971, p. 33. 130 m. in cases where the technical conditions of existence for a new mode of production come into existence before the social relations of production, this does not necessitate transition but might facilitate such an historical process given a suitable conjuncture. an example of such a conjuncture could be china during the period of the warring states or tokugawa japan. 15. poulantzas, n., op. cit ., 1973, p. 63, footnote 8. 16. ibid. , p. 63. 17. ibid. , p. 64. 18. ibid. , p. 66. 19. j: n>ia.^;-p..i5.^?i}7> hindess and hirst, op. cit. , p. 31. 21. ibid. , p. 15. 22. cf. rey p.p., op. cit. , postscript. 23. poulantzas, n., op. cit. , 1973, p. 15. 24. ibid. , p. 15. 25. poulantzas, n., "on social classes" in new left review , p. 33. 26. godelier, maurice, "on the definition of a social formation" critique of anthropology , no. 1, spring 1974, p. 63. 27. rey, p.p. "the linneage mode of production", critique of anthropology no. 3, spring 1975. 28. balibar, e. in theoretical practise , op. cit. p. 64. 29. ibid. , p. 69. 30. balibar, e., op. cit. 1970, p. 297. 31. ibid. , p. 304. 32. ibid. , p. 305 33. ibid. , p. 306-307 what is trade union bureaucracy? | 133 what is trade union bureaucracy? a theoretical account — david camfield1 ‘union bureaucracy’ is an important yet vexed term in the study of trade unions and in radical politics. at worst, it can be a label pinned by left-wing activists on those union officers whose actions or beliefs are seen as repugnant. this usage confers the label of ‘bureaucrat’ on some union officials but not on those whose behaviour is seen as praiseworthy. the term is also used in a more serious way. many critical analysts (and others) have drawn attention to the existence of a layer of full-time union officers and staff and argued that this group of people – ‘the trade union bureaucracy’ – plays a conservative role in unions. there are many versions of this kind of analysis of ‘the bureaucracy,’ some much more insightful than others. yet there have been scarcely any recent attempts to refine and present a coherent theory of union bureaucracy.2 unfortunately, it remains the case that in the study of unions, as john kelly (1988) argued over two decades ago, ‘rarely is the term “bureaucracy” defined or its use justified on any theoretical grounds, and it is normally unclear which of several different definitions is actually being employed’ (p.155). moreover, theories of ‘the trade union bureaucracy’ understood as a group of people can function as blinkers to a critical understanding of the character of union activity itself. a focus on official leaderships can lead us to ignore or neglect how union activity happens, how the relations among members and between officials and members are organized. to put the same point 1 david camfield teaches labour studies at the university of manitoba and is the author of canadian labour in crisis: reinventing the workers’ movement (2011). thanks to david mcnally, charlie post, alan sears and sheila wilmot for discussions about some of the ideas in this article, earlier versions of which were presented at the annual meetings of the society for socialist studies in 2009 and at the 2010 toronto historical materialism conference. 2 brenner (1986), leier (1991) and some of the essays collected in hyman (1989) represent original contributions that attempt to clarify the character of union bureaucracy. the past two decades have seen very few theoretical contributions on this question. darlington and upchurch (2012) is a notable exception. 134 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism differently, bureaucratic forms of social practice in union organizations risk escaping examination when ‘the bureaucracy’ is the centre of our field of vision. when this happens, the result is a very partial understanding of unions as working-class movement organisations. consequently, this article proposes an alternative theoretical account of union bureaucracy and union officialdom (members who hold elected or appointed union office, and union staff). this account seeks to incorporate the best insights of the tradition of critical analysis of ‘the trade union bureaucracy’ (full-time union officials) into a theoretical framework founded on an original conceptualization of bureaucracy as a particular mode of existence of social relations, whose relevance is not limited to the study of unions.3 the development of an explicit conceptualization of bureaucracy as a social phenomenon and, on that foundation, an account of union bureaucracy is intended to address the problem of theoretical unclarity identified by kelly. another reason for addressing the nature of bureaucracy itself is that marxist writers on bureaucracy (e.g. mandel, 1992) have tended to pay relatively little attention to theorizing the phenomenon at the most basic level, in contrast to the care paid to concepts such as class. the account proposed here attempts to grasp core processes of bureaucratization within unions in capitalist societies. it identifies the sources of bureaucracy in unions as wage-labour contracts, the separation of conception from execution in human practical activity, the political administration of unions by state power and union officialdom. the perspective advanced encourages analysis that combines attention to different manifestations of bureaucracy throughout union organizations with examination of the specific role of full-time officers and staff (rather than one or the other). the article concludes with a brief discussion of how this theory directs our attention in the analysis of contemporary unions, with specific reference to the us and canada. trade union bureaucracy as the officialdom when the concept of union bureaucracy is used in a serious fashion (rather than as a superficial political criticism), it usually refers to a group of people. this is how the concept figures in classic sociological studies such as robert michels’s oft-cited book of a century ago on 3 an anonymous reviewer pointed out that this theory could be used to scrutinize the “’ngoization’ of social movements” and “the relationship between ngos and social movements,” but i am unable to address those issues here. what is trade union bureaucracy? | 135 working-class movement organizations (1966)4 and c wright mills’s 1948 book on us union officials, the new men of power (2001, p.224). union bureaucracy is equated with a group of people by most marxist writers. for ernest mandel (1992), it is a layer of full-time officials that has carried out ‘the usurpation of decision-making power’ within the union organisation; a stratum of full-timers who have not accomplished this are ‘an incipient bureaucracy’ (p.68). for alex callinicos (1995), the union bureaucracy is ‘a social layer made up of full time officials with a material interest in confining the class struggle to the search for reforms within a capitalist framework’ (p.16). robert brenner (1985) uses the term in a similar manner, and many more examples of this kind could be cited. this usage is also common among non-marxist radicals. for example, historian mark leier (1991) advances a perspective on union bureaucracy influenced by the anarchist mikhail bakunin. leier argues that the bureaucracy is made up of leaders whose ‘offices are protected from immediate and effective control by the membership’ (p.420). by including shop stewards as part of the bureaucracy (p.424), leier differs with the previously-mentioned writers, but he shares with them the idea that the term ‘union bureaucracy’ refers to a group of people. in identifying the widespread use of the term trade union bureaucracy in this sense, i do not want to imply that all those who use it in this manner theorize union bureaucracy in the same way or equally well. for example, callinicos (1995) argues that union struggle within capitalist society inevitably requires compromises with capital, which must be negotiated by workers’ representatives. some of these representatives become full-time officials and ‘the effect, whatever the beliefs of the officials, is to isolate them from those they represent.’ removed from the paid workplace and no longer employed by capital, they ‘come to see negotiation, compromise, the reconciliation of capital and labour as the very stuff of trade unionism’ (p.17) and oppose struggle because it threatens negotiations and union funds. mandel (1992)’s theory is different in important respects. in power and money, he sees the ‘cultural underdevelopment’ of the working class (the normal ‘status of the proletariat under the rule of capital’) as the basis of union bureaucracy (p.60). at the same time, he identifies an inexorable organizational logic that creates a bureaucracy: ‘the development of mass political or trade-union organisations is incon4 while michels’s focus is on political parties and he does not use the exact term ‘union bureaucracy,’ his work considers unions as well as parties and his discussion of party bureaucracy equates it with a group of people. see the comments on michels by perusek (1995). 136 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism ceivable without an apparatus of full-timers and functionaries. at the most basic level, it is impossible to collect, centralise and administer the dues of a million members through purely voluntary labour’ (p.59). leier (1991)’s notion of bureaucracy is different again, as he argues that the bureaucracy’s ‘distinguishing characteristic...is their power over the membership’ (p.420). my point is simply that these writers share a certain understanding: union bureaucracy means the labour officialdom. the strengths and weaknesses of these specific accounts is not my concern here, though it is worth pointing out that they are all more sound theoretical efforts than michels’s belief in an iron law of oligarchy rooted in the allegedly universal incompetence of ‘the masses’ and the inherent nature of organization itself (michels, 1966; barker, 2001; perusek, 1995) or lenin’s influential but deeply flawed idea that union officials are conservative because they are part of a ‘labour aristocracy’ bribed with imperialist super-profits (lenin, 1920; post, 2011). these theories highlight the significance of the existence of layers of union officials, particularly full-time officers and staff, and nothing that follows should be interpreted as dismissing the importance of this social phenomenon, to which i will return. the most important problem common to such accounts is that their focus on full-time union officials is conducive to neglecting how union activity is socially organized more broadly. at worst, it can lead to a depiction of union officialdom as a rotten crust beneath which lies a pure, untainted organization and membership. another pitfall is that in situations where there are few or no full-time officials – as is the case in many smaller union locals in the us and canada – the theory implies by definition that bureaucracy is not a significant issue, since there are few or no bureaucrats present. above all, focusing on the head can, so to speak, lead to neglect of the body. for example, callinicos (1995) devotes most of a chapter on ‘capitalism, the unions and union leaders’ to ‘the union bureaucracy.’ it says very little about how relations between officers (whether lay, to use the british term for workers holding union office who remain on the job, or full-time) and other members are organized in the country whose unions are at the centre of the book, the uk. it also pays scant attention to the nature of collective bargaining relations or how the regulation of unions by state power (the political administration [neocleous, 1996] of unions) influences uk unions, including the officialdom. questions about the condition of union organization in paid workplaces what is trade union bureaucracy? | 137 and in branches (union locals), levels of member participation and control, the relationship between unionized workers and the nonunionized majority of the working class and the gender and racial order within british unions are raised barely or not at all. this kind of critical analysis leaves many important dimensions of a union movement unexamined or treats them as of little importance. the elaboration and defence by ralph darlington and martin upchurch (2012) of the same theoretical perspective on full-time union officials for which callinicos argues is less narrow in scope. however, it has little to say about unions as bureaucratic organizations, rather than the character of the stratum of officials at their head. this suggests that to identify bureaucracy with ‘the bureaucracy’ is too limited a notion. we need a theoretical approach that embraces other phenomena too, not just full-time officials. if union bureaucracy is not to be equated with the officialdom, what is it? richard hyman (1989) has proposed that bureaucracy in unions is ‘a corrosive pattern of internal social relations manifest in a differential distribution of expertise and activism; in a dependence of the mass of union members on the initiative and experience of a relatively small group of leaders – both official and ‘unofficial’’ (p.246). to distinguish bureaucracy as a social relation from union officers and staff as a group, one can use the term ‘labour officialdom’ to refer to the latter. from this perspective, to the degree that the relationship between members and the officers and staff is one of dependence, then what we have is a bureaucratic officialdom. this approach has the advantage of conceptually distinguishing the phenomenon of bureaucracy from that of the officialdom as a social layer. it allows us to understand many contemporary unions as bureaucratic mass organizations headed by particular bureaucratic officialdoms. unfortunately, it also creates new problems: it severs bureaucracy from any notion of regulations that constrain agents, and its emphasis on dependence on leaders blurs the line between the problematic of bureaucracy and the broader problematic of subaltern agency, self-activity and leadership. the latter is relevant in situations where bureaucracy is absent or insignificant. for these and perhaps other reasons,5 hyman’s approach, while a thoughtful attempt to move beyond the limitations of a conventional marxist theory of union bureaucracy, is flawed and unsatisfactory. 5 see darlington and upchurch (2012) and the rejoinder by hyman (2012). 138 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism what is bureaucracy? to raise the level of theoretical reflection on union bureaucracy to a higher level in a way that allows us to understand many unions as bureaucratic mass organizations, it is helpful to pose the question directly: what is bureaucracy? i suggest that bureaucracy is best understood as a mode of existence of social relations in which people’s activity (labour) is organized through formal rules that limit their ability to determine its character and goals, and which they themselves are not able to alter with ease. although informal rules may also affect people’s activity in similar ways, one of the distinguishing features of bureaucracy as a social phenomenon is the formal character of rules, as recognized by max weber (1952).6 it should also be noted that the understanding of bureaucracy suggested here does not claim that all social organization involving formal rules is bureaucratic (as might be argued by supporters of an extremely individualistic version of anarchism); rules are bureaucratic only when they limit people’s ability to determine the character and goals of their own activity and cannot be easily changed by those affected. this form of organizing social relations, while commonplace in contemporary capitalist societies, does not originate with capitalism. bureaucracy can be found in societies that long pre-date capitalism. anthropologist david graeber (2006) argues that bureaucracy occurs where ‘social situations...founded on structural violence’ (by which he means ‘forms of pervasive social inequality that are ultimately backed up by the threat of physical harm’) are being managed (pp. 4-5). the development and geographical expansion of capitalism is associated with the spread of bureaucracy; as georg lukács (1971) noted, the concern for prediction and calculability in the capitalist enterprise observed by weber is part of a broader drive to subject different aspects of social life to ‘an increasingly formal and standardised treatment...in which there is an ever-increasing remoteness from the qualitative and material essence of the “things” to which bureaucratic activity pertains’ (p.99). one of the ‘forms of pervasive social inequality’ most relevant to bureaucracy is the separation of intellectual from manual labour and the monopolization of the former by a small number of people. alfred sohn-rethel (1978) argues that intellectual labour, as distinct from manual labour, is defined by ‘the use of non-empirical form-abstractions which may be represented by nothing other than non-empirical, “pure” 6 the conceptualization of bureaucracy being proposed here is obviously not weber’s. my point is simply that weber was right to recognize the significance of formal rules to the phenomenon of bureaucracy. what is trade union bureaucracy? | 139 concepts’ (p.66). intellectual labour in this sense, he contends, first arose with the emergence of philosophy in greece, a development made possible by the ‘non-empirical real abstraction’ (p.66) involved in a ‘social synthesis’ – sohn-rethel’s term for ‘the network of relations by which society forms a coherent whole’ (p.4) – that is ‘in strict spatio-temporal separation from all acts of man’s [sic] material interchange with nature’ (p.67). thus intellectual labour was made possible by ‘the generalisation intrinsic in the monetary commensuration of commodity values promoted by coinage’ (p.102). the first occurrence of coinage he dates to ‘about 680 bc on the ionian side of the aegean, in lydia or phrygia’ (p.59).7 a number of questions can be raised about sohn-rethel’s account.8 however, for present purposes, what matters is that intellectual labour has been a source of bureaucracy to the extent that it has been monopolized by privileged social groups with the power to impose restrictive formal rules that organize the life activity of other people. examples of such groups include priests and other office-holders in religious institutions and scientists in the service of state power. a related but distinct form of domination giving rise to bureaucracy is the separation of the activity of conceptualizing the goals and methods of human activity from its execution.9 we can see rudimentary examples of this before the development of capitalism, for instance in rule-books of military organisation and state administration and in patriarchal laws that authorize men’s control over women’s labour. but it is under capitalism that the separation of conception (thinking) from execution (doing) becomes pervasive. as cornelius castoriadis (1988a) observed 7 according to seaford (2012, p. 82), “opinion has now shifted to a date towards the end of the seventh century.” 8 to contemporary readers sohn-rethel (1978)’s historical argument as presented in compressed summary here may appear as simply an example of the kind of hellenocentrism that was so marked in eurocentric german culture in the 1800s. for discussion of egypt (where he locates the earliest initial manifestation of the separation of intellectual labour), asia and greece, see pp. 86-103. an assessment of his theoretical account would require an interrogation of both his general claim about the social conditions required for the emergence of intellectual labour and the specific geographical and historical coordinates he posits for its emergence, bearing in mind the critique of western european hellenocentrism raised by authors such as goody (2006). kapferer (1980) raises a number of questions about sohnrethel’s argument, including about his claim that social synthesis in ancient greek societies was based on commodity exchange. seaford (2012) defends sohn-rethel’s analysis. 9 i distinguish the separation of conception from execution from the split between intellectual and manual labour in order to help us recognize examples of the former that do not involve the use of what sohn-rethel calls ‘non-empirical form-abstractions which may be represented by nothing other than non-empirical, ‘pure’ concepts’ and to grasp that in contemporary capitalist societies intellectual labour itself is subjected to the separation of conception from execution. for a brief discussion of this in the case of physics see schmidt (2000, p. 140). schmidt (2000) deserves to be read by anyone concerned with bureaucracy in contemporary society. 140 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism in 1960, the ‘arbitrary end’ of ‘maximum production’ ‘is accomplished through the ever-heightened separation of direction and execution, by reducing workers to the status of mere executants, and by transferring the functions of management outside the labor process’ of producing goods and services (p. 273). as harry braverman (1998)’s better-known and slightly later version of such an analysis argues, capitalist development fuels an ‘incessant breakdown of labor processes into simplified operations taught to workers as tasks,’ creating more ‘labor from which all conceptual elements have been removed and along with them most of the skill, knowledge and understanding’ (p.319). even paul thompson (1989), who does not argue that the separation of conception from execution is a necessary feature of capitalism’s organization of labour processes, recognises that competitive accumulation drives capital to reorganize production in order to reduce costs, and that this ‘sets limits to the use of workers’ creative capacities and constrains attempts to dispense with hierarchical relations’ (p.243). whether one accepts the stronger or the weaker claim (or an intermediate position), it is evident that the separation of conception from execution takes place on a large scale in the sphere of paid work in capitalist societies. this is a feature of labour processes in capitalist societies in all but their earliest phases, and is often enforced through formal rules. although capitalist development creates new productive forces and patterns of workplace organisation that generate novel kinds of conceptual work, employers have historically proceeded to attempt to separate conception from execution within such new types of labour. the example of computer programming work illustrates this trend (p. 111-112). importantly, the process of separating conception from execution is not limited to the sphere of paid work.10 this separation is also basic to public political life in capitalist societies. in capitalist states with liberal democratic systems of government the contours of the political administration of society are decided by small numbers of elected officials and unelected high-ranking civil servants; other citizens are left to execute what is decided for them. whether in the relations between employers 10 a merit of castoriadis’s work is his sensitivity to this, but he errs in going so far as to claim that ‘the fundamental social relationship of modern capitalism’ is that ‘between directors and executants’ (1988b, p. 201). writing in 1963, castoriadis displaced the relationship between capital and labour from the core of capitalist society: for classical marxism, ‘society was seen as dominated by the abstract power of impersonal capital. today, we see it as dominated by a hierarchical bureaucratic structure’ (1993, p. 31). he contrasts ‘the market’ to ‘bureaucratichierarchical organisation’ as ‘the central structuring moment of contemporary society’ (p. 31). in so doing he wrongly conflates market with capital (value). such a perspective is extremely ill-equipped to understand the rise of neoliberal capitalism and its current crisis. what is trade union bureaucracy? | 141 and wage-workers or between state power and the governed, this separation is frequently accomplished by organizing people’s life activity through the restrictive regulations of bureaucracy. in the understanding proposed here, then, bureaucracy refers to a form of social relations, a way of organising social activity, rather than a group of people. this conceptualization is quite open, but also delimits the concept clearly. bureaucracy does not encompass all situations in which people’s ability to determine their own objectives and how to act are constrained. it is present when such constraint is associated with formal rules that people cannot easily change themselves. for example, a small business run in an utterly arbitrary and despotic fashion by an owner who ‘micro-manages’ a workforce of people carrying out extremely deskilled work and who goes to great lengths to prevent workers from having access to information about the enterprise’s affairs is not a case of bureaucracy. instead, it is a classic case of the employer control strategy that richard edwards (1979) dubs simple control. this conceptualization also recognises that bureaucracy is not the only phenomenon that can impede subaltern self-activity. the phenomenon of substitutionism needs to be distinguished from bureaucracy. substitutionism involves one or more persons substituting their own actions for those of a larger number of people. to put it differently, substitutionist actions are those which do not raise the level of self-activity among members of a given group. bureaucratic methods are often substitutionist – as in the case of union rules which allow rank-and-file members little or no way to be involved in union affairs and which assign all important tasks to officers and staff, thereby substituting executive members and staff for an active membership – but not all substitutionism is bureaucratic. for example, a militant local union president who preaches ‘leave it to me’ to members and attempts to squelch or take control of any initiative that does not emanate from himself is undoubtedly a barrier to workers’ self-activity. however, his behaviour should only be considered bureaucratic if (or to the extent that) it involves the use of formal rules that limit workers’ ability to determine their own goals and actions.11 the conceptualization developed here can help us to understand how bureaucracy can pervade the practice of unionism. it is broad enough to cover a range of practices found in contemporary labour movements, including some phenomena excluded by the ‘bureaucracy 11 my use of substitutionism is influenced by but not identical to that in cliff (1960), which discusses it as a problem in the relationship between workers and a political party ‘act[ing] as proxy in their name and on their behalf, regardless of what the workers thought or wanted.’ 142 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism as officialdom’ approach. for example, it alerts us to the fact that basic distinguishing features of how unions are politically administered by state power in canada and the us – the legal and contractual prohibition of mid-contract strikes and sympathy strikes, and the requirement to resolve mid-contract disputes through grievance and arbitration procedures – are sources of union bureaucracy. these legal impositions take complaints about the employer out of the hands of unionized workers and channel them into a formal process. once a grievance enters the process, it is ‘owned’ by union officials, not the workers affected. another example of bureaucracy in the labour movement is when union rules sanction the monopolization of access to important information by a union executive or negotiating team. members deprived of such information are less able to act independently. a union organizational structure that allows few or no opportunities for democratic decisionmaking by members during a strike is also an example of bureaucracy; even if the members have democratically set the goals of the strike, their inability to direct its course means that only a few people can determine how it is conducted. a union whose constitution gives members who hold no union office few or even no ways to participate in its affairs on an ongoing basis – for example, because general membership meetings are rare – is also bureaucratic. in such unions a few people conceive and execute union work, leaving most members with literally no way to get involved. when rules of order for the running of union meetings impede members’ influence, this too is a case of bureaucracy. these examples, which are simply meant to give a sense of some of the ways that bureaucracy can be manifested within union organizations, suggest just how much is missed when a theory of union bureaucracy focuses solely or mainly on union full-time officers and staff. the social roots of union bureaucracy what gives rise to union bureaucracy? it is arguably still true, as alvin gouldner (1955) claimed, that the root causes of bureaucracy are most often seen as human nature and the complexity and size of organizations such as unions (p.498-500). even darlington (2010), a marxist, has written that ‘a hierarchical and bureaucratic structure... is inherent in the requirement that unions are administratively efficient’ (p.9). as gouldner (1955) argues, such explanations, found in the work of theorists including weber, michels and talcott parsons, are shot through with ‘pessimism and fatalism’ (p. 498). a few years after gouldner published his challenge to the dominant sociological theories of bureaucracy what is trade union bureaucracy? | 143 of the day, castoriadis responded to the claim that large organizations must inevitably be bureaucratic by arguing that the need to organize centralization in organizations is indeed an inevitable and objective problem. however, it is a problem that can be resolved either through bureaucracy or direct democracy. ‘a general meeting of strikers, an elected strike committee, the commune, the soviet, the factory council – that’s centralisation’ (castoriadis, 1988b, p.207) or, more precisely, these are anti-bureaucratic responses created by self-organized workers in struggle to the problem of centralization. castoriadis’s demonstration that there are alternatives to bureaucratic organization suggests that theories which deduce union bureaucracy as simply the inevitable outcome of organizational scale are flawed. instead of adopting an empty fatalism, we need to explore the determinate social conditions out of which union bureaucracy arises. arguably the most important cause of union bureaucracy is the practice at the centre of unionism itself: negotiating the price of labour power. the subordination of wageearners to capital in the paid workplace sphere leads organized workers to seek to regulate aspects of their working lives through collective agreements with their employers. the unequal balance of power between capital and labour is the reason why workers tend to try to codify wage levels and conditions of work in contracts. only when workers’ collective power and willingness to confront employers is so strong that they find it unnecessary or even undesirable to fix wages or conditions will wage-earners not try to lock in such matters in contracts. the ‘episodic and discontinuous character of working-class struggle under capitalism’ (post, 1999, p.122) means that circumstances in which wage-earners enjoy such a highly favourable relationship of forces are both uncommon and generally short-lived. these rare situations have given rise to unions that refuse to sign contracts, such as the industrial workers of the world in the early 20th century and some early locals of the committee for industrial organisation/ congress of industrial organisations (cio).12 once contracts are in place, employers, who are concerned with the uninterrupted production of goods and services, have strong incentives to insist that there be no strikes for the duration of the agreement. similarly, they have an incentive to assert their control over how their employees work. since it is rare for the balance of class power in the paid workplace sphere in capitalist societies to be decisively in workers’ favour – after all, this is the fundamental reason why workers fight for collective agreements in the first place – unions face pressures to accept 12 see brissenden (1957), p.115, 324, 330, 371; lynd (1996), p.5. 144 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism limits on strikes and to recognize managerial authority. such concessions arise directly out of the relations between capital and labour in the labour market and the labour process. when formalized, they are bureaucratic: they limit workers’ ability to determine the character and goals of their activity. this, then, is the source of union bureaucracy at the very core of unionism, probably its most important source. although the rule-governed separation of intellectual from manual labour is an important source of bureaucracy in contemporary capitalist societies, above all in matters related to the natural sciences and society, it is not especially important in the case of union bureaucracy. if we follow sohn-rethel (1978) and understand intellectual labour as involving ‘the use of non-empirical form-abstractions which may be represented by nothing other than non-empirical, ‘pure’ concepts’ (p.66) – for example, abstract time, space and motion – then it is difficult to see them as important to unionism. a far more important source of union bureaucracy is the separation of conception from execution. this is a key element of the alienation of labour – the structural lack of control by workers over the labour process, workplace organization and production in general – that is a hallmark of capitalist societies after their earliest phases (rinehart, 2006). in societies in which the separation of conception from execution has become normalized, or even just common, it is little surprise that workers tend to organize unions in ways that bureaucratically reflect and reproduce this separation. organizing in this way is consistent with how many aspects of their social lives are structured, including schooling, paid work, state-citizen relations and, often, voluntary associations. the separation between conception and execution can be seen in, for example, union rules that give enormous decision-making power to staff and elected officers, treating the membership as passive executants. this corresponds to how many employers treat employees, state officials treat citizens and religious authorities treat members of their congregations. nevertheless, it is also noteworthy that the tendency for workers to organize unions in ways that embody this dominant feature of capitalist society coexists with a countertendency: workers can and do organize in directly democratic ways. this democratic impulse arises out of experiences of workers’ self-activity and self-organization, and disrupts the separation between conception and execution. it can be observed most clearly in the most democratic contemporary unions, such as the fledgling national union of healthcare workers in the us (early, 2011); the unions affiliated with france’s union syndicale solidaires federation what is trade union bureaucracy? | 145 (coupé, 2007); and in forms of collective action such as strikes in which workers make important decisions in mass meetings and elect recallable strike committees.13 many unions bear, to some extent, the imprint of both this democratic countertendency and the tendency to reproduce the separation of conception from execution. the relative strength of the two in a particular case is the product of a concrete history. capitalist state power is also a significant root of union bureaucracy. states often impose formal rules that influence the social organization of unions. such rules are examples of what mark neocleous (1996) dubs political administration, his term for the legal and administrative activity of capitalist state power in civil society. political administration constitutes legal persons as both subjects of rights and objects of administration and regulates the working class through mechanisms that respond to workers’ struggles but in ways that aim to extinguish their subversive potential (p. 88-92, 110-116). it is very common for capitalist states, once they legally recognize unions, to use their legal and regulatory powers to compel unions to structure themselves in ways that limit members’ ability to determine the goals and methods of action. bans on strikes or restrictions on the timing and nature of strikes are perhaps the most frequently imposed restrictions. in the us, the ‘gradual metamorphosis of grievance arbitration from a voluntary and private mode of dispute resolution into a semicompulsory, institutional system for the management of complex enterprises’ (klare, 1978, p.377) was driven in large part by a series of judicial decisions, and the taft-hartley act of 1947 imposed important restrictions on strike action (green, 1980, p.198). in canada, legislation passed in the 1940s prohibited all strikes during the term of a contract and made grievance arbitration compulsory (fudge and tucker, 2001). however, we should not forget that bureaucratic rules concerning such matters need not be imposed by state power, since they also arise from within capital-labour relations in the labour process and the labour market, as argued above. for example, in the us the initial 1937 contract between general motors and the united auto workers ‘established a grievance procedure designed to circumvent the shop steward systems and prevent wildcat strikes’ and the 1940 contract stipulated that the grievance procedure would be the only way that the union would challenge management actions (edsforth, 1987, p.177, 193). the new bureaucratic state mechanisms for the political administration of labour that were instituted in canada in the 1940s amplified and generalized developments such as management rights clauses and grievance procedures 13 for example, the wildcat construction strikes in britain in february 2009 (gall, 2010). 146 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism that had already begun to emerge in collective bargaining (while also drawing on the us wagner act model of industrial legality and elements of pre-war canadian legislation) (camfield, 2002, p. 318). having argued that fatalist theories which simply deduce union bureaucracy from the existence of large-scale organisation are unconvincing, this article has discussed three social roots of union bureaucracy: contracts arising out of the wage relation, the separation of conception from execution and the political administration of unions by capitalist state power. it is now time to return to our starting point, the union officialdom. in addition to being a fourth source of union bureaucracy, it deserves some examination as a specific phenomenon. what about the officialdom? so far this alternative account of union bureaucracy has said almost nothing about union officials. some readers may be inclined to think that this is a theory of bureaucracy that gives bureaucrats an alibi. my concern, however, has simply been to foreground what is so often neglected or ignored in discussions of ‘the trade union bureaucracy,’ namely bureaucracy as a form of social relations. to use an imperfect analogy, this is no more an alibi for union officials than marx’s theory of the capitalist mode of production is an alibi for capitalists. the more bureaucratic a union is, the more bureaucratic its officialdom. but we should be more careful about making sweeping generalizations about union officialdoms than some radical theorists have been. that said, there is plenty of historical evidence that as collective bargaining relations become more established, giving rise to or strengthening union bureaucracy as discussed above, unions tend to acquire (more) full-time officers and staff. three examples will illustrate the pattern. as local contracts between craft unions and employers spread in the us and canada at the end of the nineteenth century these unions began to hire full-time ‘business agents’ to administer their contracts. as craig heron (1996) puts it, these staff, along with the top officers and organisers of the craft unions, developed into an officialdom which began to develop a concern with protecting the union organization, its assets, its procedures, and its contractual obligations, as well as their own status and salaries. by denying access to central strike funds or ordering strikers back to work, these full-time officials sometimes put brakes on workers’ anger and resentment (p.32).14 14 see also heron (1999) and green (1980, p.35-40). what is trade union bureaucracy? | 147 half a century later, the stabilization in the us and canada of collective bargaining between employers and industrial unions that had recently become more bureaucratic also brought with it an expansion of union officialdom; the need to process grievances within the new mandatory grievance and arbitration systems was an important reason for this growth (heron, 1996, p.80; green, 1980, p.187). in south africa, after the passage of the 1995 labour relations act, which established a new mode of industrial legality, the officialdom of the congress of south african trade unions swelled with the development of a layer of fulltime shop stewards (appolis and sikwebu, 2003). many more similar cases could be cited. the development of an extensive union officialdom is significant for a union movement. regardless of their ideological outlooks or personal commitments, full-time officials (whether officers or union staff) have material conditions that are objectively different from those of the members they are supposed to serve.15 they do not share workers’ working conditions. they are often more highly-paid than rank-and-file members and lay officials. full-time officials are only indirectly affected by employer attacks on wages and working conditions. full-time officials who deal with management on a regular basis are particularly subject to employer efforts to enlist them in efforts to limit work stoppages, get workers to accept managerial control on the job, motivate workers to work harder, and the like. these material conditions create a real tendency for full-time officials to be less sensitive to the realities of workers’ lives on the job and more attuned to management’s desires than are rank-and-file workers. this is true even when a union is an insecure organization with very few full-time officials and meagre funds. to the degree that serving as a full-time official actually becomes an occupation rather than a temporary commitment, this existence cultivates a different outlook. as the welsh radical pamphlet the miners’ next step observes, full-time officers become ‘”trade unionists by trade” and their profession demands certain privileges’ (anonymous, 1912, p.3), or at least tends to. for full-time officials who can contemplate remaining full-timers for years, the union ‘constitutes...a whole way of life – their day to day function, formative social relationships with peers and superiors on the organisational ladder, a potential career, and, on many occasions, a social meaning, a raison d’être.’ preserving this existence imposes its own imperatives: 15 this is also true for part-time officers (and other union members who are allowed time away from work for union activity), though obviously to a much lesser extent. 148 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism to maintain themselves as they are, the whole layer of officials must, first and above all, maintain their organizations. it is thus easy to understand how an irresistible tendency emerges on the part of the trade union officials... to treat their organizations as ends in themselves, rather than as the means to defend their memberships – to come to conflate the interests of the organizations upon which they depend with the interests of those they ostensibly represent (brenner, 1985, p.45). the material need to preserve the union in order to continue as a full-time official, which gives rise to the tendency to treat the union institution as an end in itself, is just as significant for a radical who takes office because of a sincere desire to further the fight for workers’ rights as it is for someone who becomes a full-timer as a way to boost their income and status and escape from highly alienated labour. an individual official may, of course, remain personally more committed to the workers she serves than to defending the union as an institution. the case of national union of mineworkers’ leader arthur scargill in the 1984-1985 miners’ strike in britain springs to mind.16 brenner’s point is not that all full-time officials are always more concerned with the institutional fate of unions than they are with workers’ interests. rather, it is that the officialdom as a whole cannot reproduce itself without preserving union institutions. there is more than one way to do this. an orientation to preserving union institutions is often accompanied with overtly class-collaborationist ideology, but need not be. it does not necessarily translate into a refusal by full-time officials to mobilize workers in struggles that defy the law to some extent – consider the political strikes organized by leaders of the canadian auto workers (caw) and most public sector unions during the days of action in province of ontario in the second half of the 1990s (camfield, 2000) and the efforts by leaders of the british columbia division of cupe to organize sympathy strikes to support striking teachers in 2005 (camfield, 2009). the central issue is that when union officialdoms become consolidated social layers their continued existence depends on the security of union institutions. consequently, the actions of full-time officials as a group will be influenced – and, in the last instance, determined by – the goal of preserving these institutions. this allows us to pinpoint why union officialdom as a social layer is a fourth source of union bureaucracy. motivated by the need to preserve union institutions in order to reproduce themselves as an officialdom, 16 see callinicos and simons (1985), which combines an appreciation of scargill’s strengths with observations about his political weaknesses. what is trade union bureaucracy? | 149 full-time officials tend to organize union activity in ways that reflect their distinct interests as a group. officials tend to favour ways of functioning that give themselves a great deal of decision-making power, at the expense of democratic rank-and-file control. as the miners’ next step puts it, of the privileges demanded by ‘”trade unionists by trade”...the greatest of all these are plenary powers...every inroad the rank and file make on this privilege lessens the power and prestige’ (anonymous, 1912, p.3-4) of full-time officials, who for this reason have an interest in opposing such democratizing moves. in short, full-time officials tend to organize union activity in ways that enhance their own sway. these are bureaucratic when they involve formal rules that limit the ability of members to determine the methods and goals of union action. this is a general tendency of the behaviour of full-time officials where union officialdom has become consolidated as a social layer; obviously there are individual exceptions. when this kind of practice does arise, it can be challenged by the influence of active members firmly committed to democratic methods designed to limit the power of full-timers, such as the radical welsh workers who a century ago proposed the miners’ next step. there are undoubtedly full-time officials who are so deeply committed to membership control that they seek to develop rather than curtail it. nevertheless, full-time officials do generally tend to promote bureaucratic functioning rooted in their distinct interests as a social layer. contrary to a common assumption, the sway of the officialdom is not always exercised against militancy or radicalism. full-time officials may try to advance one or both within unions within a bureaucratic framework. this can be seen, for example, in the militancy of the justice for janitors campaign initiated by leaders of the service employees international union (tait, 2005, p.188-189, 200-202) and the caw’s left turn in the second half of the 1990s.17 however, as a theoretical generalization, we can say that once a union officialdom has crystallized as a social layer it will tend to display institutional conservatism. the strength of this conservatism varies enormously, and is influenced by a range of factors including the extent of union bureaucratization, the degree of unions’ institutional security, the intensity of class struggle and the ideology of the union in question. the conservatism of union officials is not found only in stable contemporary unions in advanced capitalist countries; it 17 this turn and the caw’s subsequent evolution have not yet received adequate study, but see gindin (1995) and allen (2006). recognizing the possibility of bureaucratic militancy implies a questioning of the notion (present in voss and sherman [2000]) that militant mobilization is evidence of a challenge to bureaucratic unionism. 150 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism has manifested itself in far more fragile and less bureaucratic organizations. for example, late nineteenth-century us and canadian craft unions had weak legal rights, few officials and small bank accounts. yet, as discussed above, their full-time officials were increasingly preoccupied with the defence of union institutions as well as contract obligations and their own perks. in addition to noting the tendency to a conservatism based on the preservation of union institutions, we can also conclude that full-time officials tend to favour their own control within union organizations, thereby promoting bureaucracy. analyzing unions today where does this theory direct our attention in the analysis of unions? first, by highlighting the importance of formal rules that limit workers’ ability to determine the character and goals of their actions and which they themselves are not easily able to change, this approach directs our attention to the double-sided nature of collective agreements and labour law. both are often sources of union rights as well as restrictions on collective action. for example, many basic features of us and canadian labour law qualify as bureaucratic. in the us, the law prohibits sympathy (‘secondary’) strikes (lynd and gross, 2008). it also bans ‘bargaining over managerial decisions “which lie at the core of entrepreneurial control”’ and makes grievance arbitration ‘semicompulsory’ (klare, 1978, p.337). canadian law goes even further in its imposition of bureaucracy. it makes labour board certification the only permissible route to union recognition, bans recognition strikes, requires grievance arbitration procedures and (in most jurisdictions) a pre-strike compulsory conciliation process, contains a blanket prohibition of mid-contract, political and sympathy strikes, makes management rights clauses in contracts mandatory and requires the rand formula for union security (fudge and tucker, 2001, p.302-315). such instances of bureaucracy are widely accepted by unionists, precisely because they are mandated by law. as philip corrigan and derek sayer (1981) have argued, ‘integral to the law is a moral topography, a mapping of the social world which normalises its preferred contours – and, equally importantly, suppresses or at best marginalises other ways of seeing and being’ (p.33) and, i would add, doing. although many instances of bureaucracy stemming from law and contract have the straightforward effect of making it difficult for workers to engage in collective action against employers and governments, some – such as exclusive representation rights and the rand what is trade union bureaucracy? | 151 formula’s requirement that all workers covered by a union contract pay union dues – have effects on workers’ power that are more complicated. second, this theoretical perspective underscores the significance of others kinds of formal rules restricting the activity of unionized workers, chiefly those found in union constitutions and other union rules. in both the us and canada, bureaucracy is widespread in the form of organizational structures and practices at all levels – from locals all the way up to the top labour centrals – that make it difficult or impossible for unionized workers to determine what their organizations will do and how they will do it. in these countries, this kind of bureaucracy is not the result of the political administration of labour by state power. us laws in fact guarantee many union members a number of basic democratic rights (benson, 1979) while canadian law and administration impose very few requirements on the internal organization of unions (lynk, 2002). much more significant as an influence on union organizational structures in the us and canada is the pervasiveness of the separation of conception from execution in social life. the working-class movement is affected by the norms of societies in which organizations are generally understood to be properly run by small numbers of managers and ‘experts,’ with little or no popular participation. this approach has been unchallenged in the most influential political traditions within us and canadian unions. what heron (1996) writes of the politics of canadian union officials in the years after the second world war was also true of the outlook of many of their us counterparts (mills, 2001): they ‘had always emphasized the importance of expertise and centralized bureaucratic administration, rather than direct rank-and-file initiative’ (p.80). following the legal entrenchment of unions and collective bargaining in the us in the 1930s and in canada in the following decade, newlyconsolidated labour officialdoms put a stronger bureaucratic stamp on union organization. the perspective advanced in this article broadens our understanding of what union bureaucracy is. bureaucracy is not a group of leaders. nor is it an external cage in which unions are trapped. rather, as a mode of existence of social relations, it is, to varying degrees, a significant quality of unionism itself – to be precise, of particular forms of union praxis in specific times and places. where union bureaucracy exists, it is usually deeply internal to unions as workingclass movement organizations. for this reason, ‘resolutionary radicalism’ at union meetings and conferences and the denunciation of bureaucrats offer no escape from bureaucracy, which can only be 152 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism weakened through the promotion of forms of action whose character and goals are determined by workers themselves. self-activity, self-organization and democratic control from below are central to anti-bureaucratic unionism, in which the conception and execution of union activity are brought together through workers’ active participation in and control over their organisations. conditions which are conducive to this kind of unionism and practices that foster its development deserve study. references allen, b. (2006). inside the caw jacket. new socialist, 57, 18-20 anonymous (1912). the miners’ next step. being a suggested scheme for the reorganisation of the federation. tonypandy: unofficial reform committee. retrieved from http://www.llgc.org.uk/ymgyrchu/ llafur/1926/mns.pdf appolis, j. & sikwebu, d. (2003). pressing challenges facing the south african labour movement: an interview with john appolis and dinga sikwebu. in t. bramble & f. barchiesi (eds.), rethinking the labour movement in the ‘new south africa.’ (p. 205-225). aldershot: ashgate. barker, c. (2001). robert michels and the ‘cruel game.’ in c. barker, a. johnson & m. lavalette (eds.), leadership and social movements (p. 24-43). manchester: manchester university press. benson, h. (1979). democratic rights for union members. new york: association for union democracy. braverman, h. (1998). labor and monopoly capital. new york: monthly review. brenner, r. (1985). the paradox of social democracy: the american case. in m. davis, f. pfeil & m. sprinker (eds.), the year left: an american socialist yearbook (p. 32-86). london: verso. brissenden, p.f. (1957). the iww: a study of american syndicalism. 2nd ed. new york: russell and russell. callinicos, a. (1995). socialists in the trade unions. london: bookmarks. callinicos, a. & simons, m. (1985). the great strike: the miners’ strike of 1984-5 and its lessons. london: socialist worker. camfield, d. (2000). assessing resistance in harris’s ontario, 19951999. in m. burke, c. mooers & j. shields (eds), restructuring and resistance: canadian public policy in an age of global capitalism (p. 306-317). halifax: fernwood. ——— (2002). class, politics and social change: the remaking of the working class in 1940s canada. unpublished doctoral dissertation, york university, toronto. what is trade union bureaucracy? | 153 ——— (2009). sympathy for the teacher: labour law and transgressive workers’ collective action in british columbia, 2005. capital and class, 33 (3), 81-107. castoriadis, c. (1988a). modern capitalism and revolution. in d.a. curtis (ed.), political and social writings (vol. 2, p. 225-315). minneapolis: university of minnesota press. ——— (1988b). proletariat and organization, i. in d.a. curtis (ed.), political and social writings (vol. 2, p. 193-222). minneapolis: university of minnesota press. ——— (1993). recommencing the revolution. in d.a. curtis (ed.), political and social writings (vol. 3, p. 27-55). minneapolis: university of minnesota press. cliff, t. (1960). trotsky on substitutionism. retrieved from http://www. marxists.org/archive/cliff/works/1960/xx/trotsub.htm corrigan, p. & sayer, d. (1981) how the law rules: variations on some themes in karl marx. in b. fryer, a. hunt, d. mcbarnet & b. moorhouse (eds.), law, state and society (p. 21-53). london: croom helm. coupé, a. (ed.). (2007). qu’est-ce que l’union syndicale solidaires? paris: éditions de l’archipel. retrieved from http://solidaires.org/img/pdf/ union_syndicale_solidaires.pdf darlington, r. (2010). the rank-and-file versus bureaucracy analysis of intra-union relations. unpublished paper presented at the european social science history conference, ghent. darlington, r. & upchurch, m. (2012). a reappraisal of the rank-and-file versus bureaucracy debate. capital and class, 36 (1), 77-95. early, s. (2011). the civil wars in us labor: birth of a new workers’ movement or death throes of the old? chicago: haymarket. edsforth, r. (1987). class conflict and cultural consensus: the making of a mass consumer society in flint, michigan. new brunswick: rutgers university press. edwards, r. (1979). contested terrain: the transformation of the workplace in the twentieth century. new york: basic books. fudge, j. & tucker, e. (2001). labour before the law: the regulation of workers’ collective action in canada, 1900-1948. don mills: oxford university press. gall, g. (2010, february 10). the engineering construction workers’ strike. new socialist webzine. retrieved from http://www.newsocialist.org gindin, s. (1995). the canadian auto workers: the birth and transformation of a union. toronto: james lorimer. goody, j. (2006). the theft of history. cambridge: cambridge university press. 154 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism gouldner, a. (1955). metaphysical pathos and the theory of bureaucracy. american political science review, 49, 496-507. graeber, d. (2006). beyond power/knowledge: an exploration of the relation of power, ignorance and stupidity. retrieved from http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/lsepubliclecturesandevents/ pdf/20060525gra eber.pdf green, j. (1980). the world of the worker: labor in twentieth-century america. new york: hill and wang. heron, c. (1996). the canadian labour movement: a short history. toronto: james lorimer. heron, c. (1999). review of the book red flags and red tape: the making of a labour bureaucracy, by m. leier. labor history, 40, 410-412. hyman, r. (1989). the political economy of industrial relations: theory and practice in a cold climate. basingstoke: macmillan. hyman, r. (2012). will the real richard hyman please stand up? capital and class, 36 (1), 151-164. kapferer, n. (1980). commodity, science and technology: a critique of sohn-rethel. in p. slater (ed.), outlines of a critique of technology (p. 74-95). london: ink links. kelly, j. (1988). trade unions and socialist politics. london: verso. klare, k.e. (1978). judicial deradicalization of the wagner act and the origins of modern legal consciousness, 1937-1941. minnesota law review, 62, 265-339. leier, m. (1991). which side are they on? some suggestions for the labour bureaucracy debate. international review of social history, 36, 412-427. lenin, v.i. (1920). preface to the french and german editions. imperialism, the highest stage of capitalism. retrieved from www.marxists.org/ archive/lenin/works/1916/imphsc/pref02.htm lukács, g. (1971). history and class consciousness: studies in marxist dialectics. london: merlin lynd, s. (1996). introduction. in s. lynd (ed.), ‘we are all leaders’: the alternative unionism of the early 1930s (p. 1-26). urbana: university of illinois press. lynd, s. & gross, d. (2008). labor law for the rank and filer: building solidarity while staying clear of the law. oakland: pm press. lynk, m. (2002). union democracy and the law in canada. just labour, 1, 16-30. mandel, e. (1992). power and money: a marxist theory of bureaucracy. london: verso. michels, r. (1966). political parties: a sociological study of the oligarchical tendencies of modern democracy. new york: the free press. what is trade union bureaucracy? | 155 mills, c.w. (2001). the new men of power: america’s labor leaders. urbana: university of illinois press. neocleous, m. (1996). administering civil society: towards a theory of state power. london and new york: macmillan and st. martin’s. perusek, g. (1995). classical political sociology and union behavior. in g. perusek & k. worcester (eds), trade union politics: american unions and economic change, 1960s-1990s (p. 57-76). new jersey: humanities. post, c. (1999). ernest mandel and the marxian theory of bureaucracy. in g. achcar (ed.), the legacy of ernest mandel (p. 119-151). verso: london. post, c. (2011). exploring working-class consciousness: a critique of the theory of the ‘labour aristocracy.’ historical materialism, 18 (4), 3-38. rinehart, j. (2006). the tyranny of work: alienation and the labour process. 5th ed. toronto: thomson/nelson. schmidt, j. (2000). disciplined minds: a critical look at salaried professionals and the soul-battering system that shapes their lives. lanham: rowman and littlefield. seaford, r. (2012). monetisation and the genesis of the western subject. historical materialism, 20 (1), 78-102. sohn-rethel, a. (1978). intellectual and manual labour: a critique of epistemology. atlantic highlands, nj: humanities. tait, v. (2005). poor workers’ unions: rebuilding labor from below. cambridge, ma: south end. thompson, p. (1989). the nature of work: an introduction to debates on the labour process. 2nd ed. houndmills: macmillan. voss, k. & sherman, r. (2000). breaking the iron law of oligarchy: union revitalization in the american labor movement. american journal of sociology, 106 (2), 303-349. weber, m. (1952). the essentials of bureaucratic organization: an ideal-type construction. in r.k. merton (ed.), reader in bureaucracy (p. 18-27). glencoe: the free press. 156 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism 236 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism beyond the economic crisis: the crisis in trade unionism — sam gindin1 the earlier contributions to this collection might be summarized as warning us that that things are going to get a lot worse before they get… worse.2 this is not just a matter of the sustained attacks on the labour movement but as much a reflection of the crisis within labour. for some three decades now, labour has been stumbling on, unable to organizationally or ideologically rebut the attacks summarized as ‘neoliberalism’. though the great financial crisis held out the promise of finally exposing the right and its supporters and potentially opening the door to a union offensive and possible revival, the attacks on labour in actuality intensified and labour continues to have no coherent counter-response. as a prelude to directly addressing that impasse in labour, it is useful to begin with something that greg albo (2012) posed in his presentation to the conference forerunner to this collection: what is the larger historical significance of this particular crisis? though cyclical downturns are common in capitalism, structural crises are of relatively rare occurrence, generally separated by a generation or so (30 years or more).3 such crises reflect social and institutional barriers that block capitalism’s normal continuation, and the question for capital and its governments then becomes what, if anything, might take capitalism to a new stage that allows for the resumption of its drive. for example, the outcome of the crisis that began at the end of the 1960s and ran through the 1 sam gindin retired from the canadian auto workers’ union in 2000 after 27 years on staff, the last 16 as assistant to the president. from 2001 through 2011 he was the visiting packer chair in social justice at york university, toronto. 2 see also the presentations from the conference: the global economic crisis and canadian austerity: perception versus reality available at http://www.alternateroutes.ca/index.php/ar/ pages/view/video 3 it is common to identify three structural crises in capitalism before the latest one: the first occurring in the last quarter of the 19th century, the second introduced by the 1929 stock market crash and lasting through the 1930s, the third breaking out in the late 1960s and running through the 1970s. see panitch and gindin, 2011. beyond the economic crisis | 237 1970’s was first and foremost that the earlier strength of labour was broken. as well, finance was liberalized, globalization was accelerated, and the state was restructured – not weakened or withdrawn to the end of establishing more autonomy from popular pressures and therefore actually emerging stronger in terms of supporting private accumulation. the resolution of that crisis, in short, set the conditions and contradictions that frame the crisis we face today (panitch and gindin, 2012). four aspects of this present crisis seem especially significant. first, in spite of the domestic and international turmoil there has been remarkably little challenge to globalization and free trade. contrast this with the last time we had a crisis this deep, in the 1930’s, when protectionist sentiments were strong and common, and capitalism as an international system seemed threatened. yet today, no country has placed exiting global capitalism on the agenda.4 the issue, rather, is that with globalization taken for granted, how can crises, particularly the financial crises linked to the expansion of global capitalism, be contained (i.e. managed). this brings us to a second facet of the crisis. in spite of a general understanding that private bankers and other financial institutions were responsible for the crisis, the solution to the crisis is not to weaken but strengthen them and to develop the state capacities to contain – not end future volatility. we need to understand this not as a matter of stupidity or corruption (though both play a role!), but as a reflection of the structural importance of finance to capitalism as a whole. we often separate finance from the rest of the system and describe it as a speculative parasite (jim stanford (2012, in an otherwise valuable presentation, tended to do this as well). but if that were the case, we should have expected divisions within the capitalist class with the rest of capital, suffering in terms of stagnating markets, ready to join the attack on finance. instead, there has been remarkably little evidence of splits between financial capital and the rest. this reflects the extent to which finance and industry are in fact tightly integrated. it is not so much that large industrial corporations need daily credit since they have more profits and cash than they know what to do with but rather the importance of credit to mergers and restructuring, the need on the part of global corporations for specialized financial services to ease trade and limit exchange rate risks and other uncertainties, the discipline financial markets impose on workers, states, and capital itself to be true to the priorities of profits and private 4 even in greece, syriza (the leading left opposition group) has emphasized the need to modify, not transform, greece’s relationship to the international economy and has posed exit from the euro not as a goal, but as a reluctant option if the counter-productive austerity pressures continue. 238 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism capital accumulation, and in the case of the us its special access to the world’s savings. the contradiction lies in the fact that on the one hand all of capital would like finance to be less volatile and more orderly, but they don’t want to see it regulated to the point that they lose the advantages that global finance has brought them. a third aspect of the crisis is, as greg albo (2012) emphasized, the tendencies across countries towards a more authoritarian state. this has been most dramatic in europe where external institutions have placed ‘technical experts’ at the head of government to carry out ‘reforms’ but is also seen in the legislation essentially trying to outlaw protest in the student strike in quebec. this is part of a more general trend towards states gaining more autonomy from the electorate to do what’s necessary for capital accumulation. and it has especially emerged in regard to the fourth aspect, downsizing social services and attacking public sector unions, generally the last standing bastion of trade unionism. in this regard, the story of labour’s defeat doesn’t go back just to the 1970’s but to the immediate postwar period when the left inside and outside the labour movement was marginalized. in spite of that defeat, trade unionism was able to make gains, real gains, for a while. but that defeat of the left came with a loss of capacities critical to understanding, strategizing, and mobilizing. and when capitalism changed and now identified past labour gains as a barrier to continued progress, labour no longer had the capacity to resist. so the second defeat of labour, taking place through the 1980’s and 1990’s, shifted from that of a small but influential left to trade unionism as a whole, especially the private sector. today, capital is trying to consolidate and complete that defeat by going after the public sector and ensuring that it does not inspire any positive examples for private sector workers. a central aspect of this three decades long assault on the labour movement has been a profound lowering of expectations. the intensification of competition from the third world seems to have set boundaries on worker demands, even though most of our trade is still with the developed countries and most workers are now employed in private and public services, sectors not directly limited by trade. greater globalization seemed to place possible government responses beyond the reach of domestic politics, even though it was states that endorsed globalization (and can potentially also check it). the state-endorsed defeats workers suffered left many of them angry but still redefining what might be considered ‘success’. the world we criticized so strongly a short while ago was now looked back on with nostalgia. beyond the economic crisis | 239 herman rosenfeld (2012; this issue) captures this shift when he asks why responses that seemed so obvious in an earlier era are now so out of bounds (like rejecting a plant takeover at caterpillar in contrast to the takeover, with less provocation, in the early 1990s). this shift in what is possible in terms of both goals and tactics highlights the cultural change in the labour movement. talk to any worker and you don’t have to convince them that capitalism doesn’t work for them. they know that, but believe they just can’t do anything about it. confidence in resistance, let alone change, is at an all-time low. fatalism is now the dominant mood and the main barrier to fighting back. to some the stagnation of trade unions is often explained in terms of bureaucratization and the thin democracy characteristic of unions (even though relative to other institutions, unions democracy still compares very favorably). but as significant as such aspects are, they do not get to the core of the ‘union problem’. as steve tufts and mark thomas (2012) noted in terms of their discussion of populism, you can have a very militant and democratic movement but it can also end up being very particularistic (‘militant particularism’, in the phrase used by raymond williams (1989) and elaborated by david harvey (1996)). workers can, for example, demand militancy but also insist that their union concentrate entirely and narrowly on defending the workers that finance its operations and not only ignore the plight of other workers such as the poor or new immigrants and even join in the attacks on them. such sectionalism highlights the fact that though unions emerged out of the working class, they are not class organizations in the sense of representing the class as a whole. that sectionalism is directly tied to the issue of bureaucratization and limited democracy. if members see their unions as insurance agencies – instrumental organizations paid for by dues – they won’t be looking for more participation but only that they get the service ‘contracted for’. correspondingly, leaders don’t see much priority in developing and mobilizing the capacities of workers – never mind raising expectations and putting more pressure on themselves – and so look to developing only that level of democracy, tempered by ‘loyalty’, to achieve a level of gains that doesn’t undermine their leadership. there was a time when that narrow solidarity of unions didn’t hinder unions all that much; they made gains and those gains even spread to other workers and the community. but that era is over. the notion that workers can survive and defend past achievements, let alone make new gains, through just looking after their own with no larger understanding of the common attacks all workers face and their mutual dependence 240 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism on the rest of the working class, is now daily exposed. absent a class perspective unions can today neither defend their members nor come to grips with how to renew themselves. consider organizing. only a broader sense of building the class will lead to the commitment of resources and voluntary energy to unionize in the present hostile climate. moreover, making breakthroughs in the new sectors where the majority of workers are now employed is unlikely to occur without cooperation across unions. the present competition for union dues dollars blocks such cooperation and ends up undermining each union. it too can only come from recognizing that the issue isn’t the growth of any particular institution – canadian auto workers, united steel workers, canadian union of public employees or ontario public service employees union – but that of building the working class as a social force. and it is only when we start from the class perspective that other creative approaches, like bringing individual workers into a union culture whether or not they have a bargaining unit. 5 or consider bargaining. in the 2012 round of the canadian union of public employees (cupe) bargaining with the city of toronto, individual cupe locals bargained with the municipal state. it was obvious enough that the bargaining had ramifications for all cupe members and of course workers beyond cupe. yet there was no explicit acknowledgment that individual locals can’t win against the state and that coordination across the union – itself a step towards winning other workers and their communities over was paramount. a coordinated strategy might have put the library workers, the workers with the greatest support, first out of the gate. it might have then contemplated selective tactical strikes, escalating to mass mobilizations and eventually bringing in the rest of the public sector while also mobilizing the community around the services provided. the point is that the only way union renewal can happen in the public sector, is to recognize what workers are up against, the extent to which the state’s focus is on isolating them, that it is the state itself and not ‘an employer’ the union is fighting, and establish itself as the leader in the fight to defend and expand social services. this is not easy; it requires a transformation of everything about public sector unions. it is not a matter of simply passing strong resolutions and putting up expensive billboards. the public is – understandably too cynical to be moved by public relations alone. 5 the canadian auto workers and communications, energy and paperworkers union, in preparation for their merger, recently announced their enthusiasm for such an approach. see caw-cep, 2012 beyond the economic crisis | 241 rather, it means rethinking union strategic priorities, rethinking the role of staff and their subsequent training, and coming to see union members as potential organizers for moving the public and shifting research and education to that end. it means not just defensively insisting that the public sector is ‘good’ but also being at the forefront of criticizing its bureaucratization and waste through acting as whistleblowers actively defending the public. and it even means moving to place the level, quality and administration of social services on the bargaining table (in the last municipal strike, for example, might not the municipal workers have emerged more successful, with greater protection for their members, if their primary bargaining demand – the one they might strike for – was keeping garbage services public rather than handing them over to profit-hungry and service-poor multinational corporations?). finally, it means creatively addressing the contradiction that traditional strike tactics now isolate workers from the public while it is so crucial to win that public over: e.g. dumping garbage during strikes not in parks but on bay street to make the connection between austerity and finance; continuing bus service but not collecting fares; delivering, as cupw did in the 1990s, pension and welfare checks even though on strike.6 a class perspective is likewise central to union renewal in the private sector. here the fundamental issue revolves around jobs. the function of unions is to negotiate the sale of labour power yet the greatest concern of workers is something unions have little or no input into – the existence of jobs in the first place. unless unions can deal with workers’ prime concern, union renewal can’t happen and even the bargaining position of unions will be further eroded as workers, facing the alternative of indefinite unemployment or a very much inferior level of pay and benefits, end up vulnerable to making concessions in a vain attempt to protect their jobs.7 a number of things follow from any emphasis on seriously dealing with the jobs issue. toby sanger (2012; this issue) flagged one of them in noting that in not adequately reinvesting its profits in decent jobs, the private sector is openly admitting that it can’t provide decent jobs 6 for a discussion of such an alternative strike tactics, which at least set the stage for when traditional strikes become necessary, see hurley and gindin, 2012. 7 one particular concession that reflects the logic of thinking instrumentally and undermines even the internal solidarity in unions is passing concessions on to future workers by agreeing to lower wages for new hires (as recently occurred at the lear siegler plant in kitchener). this not only undercuts the union principle of equal pay for equal work but open the way for the next generation of workers using that ‘lesson’ to in turn betray retirees. and since the very first experience of the very workers on whom union revival will critically depend is to see unionism at its least solidaristic, it virtually guarantees its failure. 242 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism for everyone. jobs must therefore depend on an expanded public sector, including into spaces that were formerly seen as inherently private. that is, it’s not just a matter of keeping health care in the public domain and not outsourcing it, but also thinking in new ways about sectors like auto. for one thing, we can’t build new alliances if we’re calling for subsidies for gm and the rest of the industry while social services are being cut. moreover, those subsidies won’t, as we’ve seen deliver jobs because productivity in the auto industry keeps rising while the market is limited – and a push for far ‘more cars’ is also not a viable strategy given the already overwhelming traffic congestion and environmental concerns. on the other hand there is enormous productive capacity in all of those facilities and worker skills; they can make the widest range of things that we do need. what needs to be placed on the agenda, by unions above all, is the waste of closing them when they could be converted to producing socially useful goods, starting with the environment. taking the environmental crisis seriously means the entire material foundation of society will have to be changed: the transportation and communication infrastructure, the machinery and tools in every factory, the construction of homes and appliances, offices and equipment everything. this means explicitly talking about preserving our productive potential not gm and ford, planning instead of competition, asking about social utility not profit. we obviously can’t win this right now, but it poses the question of how we organize today so this becomes a real option down the road. as radical as this sounds it’s worth remembering that in the second world war, canada and the us demonstrated a astonishing capacity to convert facilities in a remarkably short time and then reconvert them again after the war. as fundamental as internal changes are to union renewal, this is only a step to changing the external environment facing workers. and in this regard, we can’t just lament the power of the financial system over our lives and occasional shale our fists at them. we need to question why, in an allegedly democratic society, they stand above us – profiting enormously in good times, blackmailing us to bail them out in bad, and always insisting that what is good for banks should frame public policy. if they are in fact to be treated as having the weight of essentially being ‘public utilities’, they should be taken over and become democratic public utilities. this is not just a matter of ideology; it is a practical issue. if we really want to convert industry, if we really want to defend the public sector, if we want to chart what kind of society we want to have, controlling finance is a precondition. otherwise, we’ll remain in the beyond the economic crisis | 243 trap of catering to them and being disciplined by them whether it’s in the workplace or in terms of government policy. here again, taking on such a fundamental part of the canadian power establishment is not something that will happen just because we assert its need. but unless we begin to talk about it now, educate around it and mobilize for it, it will always be out of reach. in criticizing the labour movement for its failure to change, it is vital to understand this as being as much a failure of the left itself; the crisis of labour and that of the left go hand in hand. there’s a strong case to be made that we will not see a renewal of the labour movement unless there’s also simultaneously a renewal of the left. it seems clear enough that in spite of some positive developments, the leadership of the trade union movement has neither the inclination nor capacity to radically transform their organizations while the membership is too fragmented and too overwhelmed to sustain anything but the occasional sporadic rebellion. for rank and file workers to do more will require the resources and support from a left with feet both inside and outside unions that can link workers across workplaces, clarify what workers face and why a class response is critical to what workers now face. what, more specifically, might be done? one initiative that came out of the crisis was the establishment of the greater toronto workers assembly. it was inspired by two realities. first, that the formation of a new socialist party was simply not on the agenda until a stronger labour base was laid. second, the fact that, as noted earlier, out of the last comparable crisis – the depression of the 1930s a new form of working class organization was born and this pointed to the challenge today. the craft unionism that dominated working class organization at that time was inadequate to what workers faced and in a remarkable act of working class creativity, industrial unionism emerged as a dynamic alternative. today we need to think just as honestly and creatively about whether unions in their present form are adequate. it’s not that unions are going to disappear; they will continue to soldier on and occasionally demonstrate their potential, but on their own unions are simply not enough to deal with what workers face. the greater toronto worker assembly was an attempt to think about a form of working class organization that could support union renewal but also act beyond unions.8 it was anti-capitalist, not a coalition but organization of individuals looking for another kind of politics that was class based. it defined class very broadly to include not just the minority of 8 see www.workersassembly.ca 244 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism workers who are unionized, but the unemployed, the poor, and lowwage non-union workers. and it included all the dimensions of our lives that reflect class outside of the workplace. one especially important goal of the assembly in terms of union renewal – one it remains a long way from achieving – was to establish networks of activists across workplaces. this might take the form of fight back committees in every local that are focused on educating their own members, establishing links to the community, and engaging in joint solidarity actions.9 the role of the assembly would be to facilitate the formation of such committees, contribute to organizing the crossworkplace educationals and training, hold forums where experiences could be shared and generally support the development of groups of activists who, among other things, would also fight to inject a class perspective into their unions (gindin, 2012). let me conclude with three observations. first, the argument that ‘there is no alternative’ (tina) is actually true in the sense that moderate options simply can’t stand up to what we today face in capitalism. options have been radicalized and we need to recognize and confidently assert is that the radical is now the only thing that’s practical. directly related to this, we now have to think bigger even to win small. even if we just hoped to defend what we have, the lesson of the past quarter century is clearly that tinkering around the edges or being modest will protect us. either we think more radically and bigger or things will continue to get worse. finally, what we face is an organizational barrier. if we understand the inactivity of workers as reflecting their fatalism, their sense that nothing can be done, then this can only be addressed by concretely demonstrating the potentials of organized collective action. workers aren’t inherently radical and they’re not inherently conservative; they adapt to the structured options they face. once they are convinced that organizations exist that hold out some confidence that struggle can change things, even if that will take time, workers will be there. it’s in this regard that the socialist left has failed over the last quarter-century, and it is this organizational challenge that identifies the principal current challenge for the left. 9 a group of locals in the airline industry in toronto (including locals from the international association of machinists and aerospace workers, the caw and cupe) have been working together with some other non-airline locals (particularly in the municipal sector) to support each other in conflicts, do joint educationals, and strategize. beyond the economic crisis | 245 references albo, g. (2012, march 23). the state and exists from the crisis. conference presentation. the global economic crisis and canada austerity, alternate routes, ryerson university. http://www.alternateroutes.ca/ index.php/ar/pages/view/global%20economic%20 crisis%20%26%20 canadian%20austerity caw-cep. (2012, august). towards a new union: caw-cep proposal committee final report. http://www.newunionproject.ca/wpcontent/ uploads/2012/08/final.report.pdf. gindin, s. (forthcoming, 2012). rethinking unions, registering socialism. socialist register, 2013. london: merlin press. harvey, d. (1996). justice, nature and the geography of difference. oxford: blackwell. hurley, m. and s. gindin. (2011). the assault on public services: will unions lament the attacks or lead the fightback? the bullet. http:// www.socialistproject.ca/bullet/516.php panitch, l. and s. gindin. (2011). capitalist crises and the crisis this time. in panitch, l., g. albo and v. chibber (eds.), the crisis this time, socialist register (p.120). london: merlin. panitch, l. and s. gindin. (2012). the making of global capitalism: the political economy of american empire. new york: verso. rosenfeld, h. (2012, march 23). cat closure: what have we lost? what can we learn? conference presentation. the global economic crisis and canada austerity, alternate routes, ryerson university. http://www. alternateroutes.ca/index.php/ar/pages/view/global%20economic%20 crisis%20%26%20canadian%20austerity sanger, t. (2012, march 23). public finance, pensions and p3’s. conference presentation. the global economic crisis and canada austerity, alternate routes, ryerson university. http://www.alternateroutes.ca/ index.php/ar/pages/view/global%20economic%20 crisis%20%26%20 canadian%20austerity stanford, j. (2012, march 23). canadian (non)exceptionalism: crisis, recovery, austerity. conference presentation. the global economic crisis and canada austerity, alternate routes, ryerson university. http://www. alternateroutes.ca/index.php/ar/pages/view/global%20economic%20 crisis%20%26%20canadian%20austerity thomas, m.p. and s. tufts. (2012, march 23). uneven worker power and the populism-austerity-labour nexus. conference presentation. the global economic crisis and canada austerity, alternate routes, ryerson university. http://www.alternateroutes.ca/index.php/ar/pages/view/ global%20economic%20 crisis%20%26%20canadian%20austerity williams, r. (1989). resources of hope. new york: verso. 51 can global capitalism be saved? “exit strategies” for capitalism or humanity minqi li1 abstract: global capitalism is currently recovering from the great recession of 2009. but the basic contradiction of neoliberalism has not been resolved. the fiscal deficits in the western countries and china’s real estate bubble are setting up the world for a potentially more devastating crisis. china may emerge as the key battleground of global class struggle. as the global ecological system approaches total collapse, any further expansion of capitalism is now in fundamental conflict with the long-term survival of humanity. keywords: global capitalism, crisis, class struggle, global ecological crisis introduction in 2009, global capitalism suffered the deepest economic crisis since the great depression. in previous crises, such as in the early 1980s, early 1990s, 1998, and 2001, the global economy had managed to grow, though at comparatively slower rates. in 2009, according to the international monetary fund (imf), the global economy as a whole contracted in absolute terms for the first time since the second world war (see figure 1). in response to the crisis, leading capitalist governments have thrown trillions of dollars to bail out the financial markets and kept the economies afloat through massive increases in fiscal deficits. since then, the global economy seems to have recovered. the imf now predicts the global economy to grow by 4.6 percent in 2010 (imf 2010). has global capitalism been saved, after all? the question may be addressed at three different levels. first, there is no doubt that capitalism has survived the most recent economic crisis. however is the world 1 assistant professor, department of economics, university of utah, salt lake city, utah, usa. he is the author of the rise of china and the demise of the capitalist world economy (pluto press and monthly review press, 2009). can global capitalism be saved? “exit strategies” for capitalism or humanity 52 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research back to some form of “normal conditions”? capitalism is basically an economic system based on the pursuit of profit and capital accumulation. saving capitalism, in this sense, has to do with securing the conditions that favor high profit rates and rapid capital accumulation (economic growth). will these “normal conditions” required for capitalist expansion be reestablished in the foreseeable future? second, there is the long-term, world historical question whether capitalism as an economic and social system can be saved in the long run. what historical conditions are required for capitalism to remain a “savable” system? under what historical conditions may capitalism cease to exist as a historically viable system? third, if it turns out that capitalism is no longer historically viable, in that case, what might be the “exit strategies” that are available for humanity? the following pages attempt to shed some light on each of these questions. -0.01 0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 figure 1. world economic growth (annual growth rate of world gdp, 1951-2009) annual growth rate sources: maddison (2003); world bank (2010); and imf (2010). profit and accumulation capitalist profit derives from the exploitation of workers’ surplus labor. from this point of view, maximum profit requires maximum exploitation of labor. however, other things being equal, maximum exploitation is always beneficial for individual capitalists; it is not necessarily in the interest of the entire capitalist class however. excessive exploitation reduces workers’ purchasing power. under certain conditions, it could also reduce the overall “effective demand” in the capitalist econ53 omy, thus lowering the total profits for capitalists. successful capitalist accumulation requires an effective (though temporary) solution to this contradiction. this may be illustrated by the following formula: w + π + t = c + i + g + nx this equation shows that in a capitalist economy, the sum of wages (w), profits (π), and taxes (t) must equal the sum of consumption (c), investment (i), government purchases (g), and net exports (nx), that is exports less imports, or net purchases by foreigners. in other words, total incomes must equal total expenditures. rearrange terms and one arrives at the following profit determination formula: π = i + (c-w) + (g-t) + nx this equation illustrates that capitalist profits may increase if there is a rise in capitalist investment, or household consumption in excess of wages (which roughly corresponds to “household deficit”), government deficit or trade surplus.2 from the point of view of a national capitalist economy, the most ideal solution would be to keep wages and taxes low, while keeping profits high through large trade surpluses. however, this obviously cannot work for all national capitalist economies as some economies’ surpluses have to be matched by other economies’ deficits and, for the global capitalist economy as a whole, imports and exports by definition should cancel out. for the global capitalist economy or any national capitalist economy that has a trade account that is in rough balance, the “optimal” solution would appear to be keeping wages and taxes low, while solving the “effective demand” problem (also known as the “realization” problem) through high investment. this would maximize the rate of capital accumulation. however, capitalists would make large investments only when they expect high rates of return (the profit rate). but excessively high investment could lead to excess production capacity and higher production costs, leading to lower profit rates. finally, there are the “second best” options such as household deficits or government deficits. the problem with these less than ideal solutions is that they will inevitably lead to unsustainable household or public debt, likely ending with devastating financial crises. how has capitalism historically managed to maneuver between these different temporary “solutions”? figure 2 presents the historical trajectory of the profit rate in the us economy, a crucial indicator that represents the degree of “health” of a capitalist economy.3 2 this profit rate determination formula was first developed by polish marxist economist michael kalecki and later adopted by hyman minsky (minsky 2008[1986]: 160-169). 3 the profit rate is defined as the ratio of the broadly defined profit (including corporate profits, interests, and rent) over the can global capitalism be saved? “exit strategies” for capitalism or humanity 54 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research the great depression marked the bankruptcy of free market capitalism and demonstrated that modern capitalism could not function without substantial government intervention. after the second world war, capitalism underwent major institutional restructuring. government spending now accounted for a substantial portion of the national economic output and keynesian policies helped to stabilize the capitalist economy. several factors contributed to comparatively high profit rates in the 1950s and 1960s. u.s. corporations benefited from monopoly over world industry in the early postwar years. on the other hand, in western europe and japan, a large rural surplus labor force kept pressure on wages, thereby keeping labor costs low. all advanced capitalist countries benefited from cheap energy and raw materials imported from the periphery (the “third world”). however, by the mid-1960s all of these favourable factors started to fade. competition between the us, japan and western europe in the world market intensified. after decades of economic expansion, strengthened by welfare state institutions, western working classes enjoyed a period of rising bargaining power and wages started to grow rapidly. finally, given the triumph of a good many national liberation movements, and politically strengthened by “cold war” geopolitics, peripheral states started to demand more favourable terms in the world division of labor.4 the collapse of the profit rate led to the crisis of the 1970s and early 1980s. in response, the global capitalist classes undertook a counter-offensive in the form of neoliberalism which in effect amounted in a strategy to revive the global profit rate through global redistribution of income and wealth from labor to capital. “globalization” was a key component of neoliberalism, which had to do with opening up the markets and resources of several large peripheral or former socialist states. the massive increase in the global reserve army of cheap labour turned the global balance of power decisively in the favour of the capitalist class. as is presented in figure 2, neoliberalism did succeed in reviving the profit rate. but by lowering the global wages, neoliberalism necessarily depressed the global mass of consumption. the neoliberal global economy was thus confronted with a serious problem of insufficient global effective demand. in this context, many capitalist economies (china, japan, other asian economies, and germany) attempted to promote capital accumulation through expansion of exports (that is, net stock of private nonresidential fixed assets. ideally, if the purpose is to study the overall performance of global capitalist economies, one would like to examine the evidence of the global average profit rate. but reliable data on the subject is not available. given the leading position of the us in the global economy, one may think about the us profit rate as representative of the profit rate in the global capitalist economy. the profit rate trajectories of other advanced capitalist economies have been similar to that of the us in the postwar era and until recently the overall performance of the global capitalist economy had been largely determined by the performance of the advanced capitalist economies. for an attempt to study the “world profit rate”, see li, xiao, and zhu (2007). 4 for detailed discussions on the rise and fall of the postwar capitalist “social structure of accumulation,” see gordon, weisskopf, and bowles (1987). 55 through rising nx). however, as mentioned earlier, this meant that some economies would have to run trade surpluses, while others ran trade deficits. since the 1990s, the us economy has consistently run large trade deficits, absorbing much of the overproduction from the rest of the world. within the us economy, demand expansion has relied mostly upon debt-financed consumption (that is, through rising c-w). the situation was already unsustainable by the early 2000s. but the us federal reserve attempted to prolong the expansion by fueling a massive housing bubble, paving the way for the 2008-2009 economic crisis.5 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 figure 2. e profit rate (us economy, 1929-2008) profit rate source: bea (2010). “exit strategies” for capitalism? to save global capitalism, all major capitalist governments have responded with massive increases in fiscal deficits. in terms of the profit determination formula discussed above, this amounts to an effort to substitute (g-t) for (c-w) to sustain capitalist profits. the problem is that such a strategy will simply substitute fiscal crises for private debt crises. according to the bank of international settlements, by 2011 the general government debt to gdp ratio is expected to approach 100 percent in france, portugal and the united kingdom; 130 percent in greece and italy; and exceed 200 percent in japan (cecchetti, mohanti, and zampolli 2010). in fact, several southern european countries (greece, spain, portugal, and italy) are 5 for detailed discussions on the structural contradictions of neoliberalism, see crotty (2000) and li (2009). can global capitalism be saved? “exit strategies” for capitalism or humanity 56 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research now threatened with imminent fiscal bankruptcy. in a few years, major capitalist countries such as the us and uk may have to confront an explosive fiscal crisis. the current dilemma for western capitalism, then, is the following. if western capitalist governments respond to the fiscal crisis by imposing massive fiscal austerity programs (through cutting social spending and increasing taxes on the working classes), it would dramatically reduce global effective demand. this would, at best, result in a period of prolonged stagnation throughout the advanced capitalist world and, at worst, trigger a collapse of the global economy. on the other hand, if western governments fail to address the fiscal crisis in accordance with the dictates of financial markets, financial capitalists may respond with massive sales of government bonds, leading to surging interest rates and economic collapses. in this context, the so-called “emerging markets” (such as china, india, russia, eastern europe and latin america and especially china), have emerged as a major pillar of global economic growth. figure 3 presents the share of world gdp of the world’s major economies. in 2008, the us, eurozone and japan combined accounted for 42 percent of the world’s total gdp (and us accounted for 20 percent). the socalled “bric” countries (brazil, russia, india, and china) combined accounted for 22 percent of world gdp (and china accounted for 11 percent). can china sustain global economic growth in spite of western stagnation? 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 figure 3. share of world gdp (selected economies, 1980-2008) us euro area japan china india brazil russia source: world bank (2010). 57 figure 4 presents china’s changing macroeconomic structure. household consumption as a share of china’s gdp declined from about 50 percent in the 1980s to about 35 percent by 2008 (by comparison, in the us household consumption accounts for about 70 percent of gdp). the relative decline of consumption reflects the fact that chinese working class incomes have fallen behind the growth of gdp. according to the official chinese general federation of labor survey, labour income as a share of china’s gdp declined from 57 percent in 1983 to 37 percent in 2005. further, according to the survey, in an economy with double-digit growth, about a quarter of the labour force has not seen any wage growth over the past five years. about 75 percent of workers believe the current income distribution in china is “unjust” and about 60 percent of workers believe excessively low labour income represents the greatest social injustice (xin jing bao 2010). on the other hand, capital formation (investment) as a share of china’s gdp increased from 35 percent in 2000 to 44 percent in 2008, and net exports as a share of china’s gdp increased from 2 percent in 2001 to 8 percent in 2008. from 2001 to 2008, china’s total merchandise exports (not subtracting imports) increased from 20 percent of gdp to 33 percent of gdp. thus, before the recent crisis, china’s economic growth was led primarily by investment and exports. -0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 figure 4. china's macroeconomic structure (share of gdp, 1980-2008) household consumption government consumption capital formation source: state statistical bureau (2009). can global capitalism be saved? “exit strategies” for capitalism or humanity 58 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research during 2009, in the midst of global economic crisis, chinese exports decelerated sharply. total merchandise exports fell by 16 percent from 2008. china’s trade surplus fell from $196 billion in 2008 to $102 billion in 2009, falling by 48 percent. investment emerged as china’s only remaining engine of economic growth. from 2008 to 2009, china’s total fixed investments increased from 17.3 trillion yuan to 22.5 trillion yuan (or an increase of 5.2 trillion yuan). china’s nominal gdp increased from 31.4 trillion yuan to 33.5 trillion yuan (or an increase of 2.1 trillion yuan). increase in total fixed investments thus accounted for 240 percent of china’s economic growth in 2009 (that is, the increase in fixed investments more than offset declines in consumption and net exports to have sustained economic growth) (state statistical bureau 2010a). in early 2010, china’s economic growth continued to be led by investment. over the first four months of 2010, total urban fixed investments increased by 26 percent from the same period in 2009 (about twice as fast as overall economic growth). however, excessively high investment has by now built up enormous excess capacity in productive sectors. unable to profit from productive investment any more, chinese capitalists are shifting a growing proportion of capital into property and financial speculation. over the first four months of 2010, about 21 percent of the fixed investments went to real estate development, which increased by 36 percent from the same period in 2009 (state statistical bureau 2010b). andy xie, the former chief asian economist of morgan stanley, recently commented that china could face major economic and political instabilities in a few years. it is likely that china will face rising labour, raw materials and environmental costs in the coming years. also, china’s share in the world export market may shrink against the background of western economic stagnation. as a result, capital accumulation in the productive industries is no longer profitable. in this context, chinese capitalists and local governments have relied upon real estate development to prolong the economic boom. china is in effect following the same path as japan, korea, and southeast asian economies once did. these asian economies relied upon property bubbles to sustain economic growth after the export boom ended. xie (2010) has argued that in a few years, china’s property bubble will likely burst, leaving china with a stagnant economy and threatening china’s political stability. the basic contradiction of the neoliberal global economy is that under neoliberalism, working class incomes and purchasing power tends to be depressed and liberalized capital flows tend to generate financial instability, discouraging productive investment and government social spending. global effective demand thus tends to be depressed. many national capitalist economies attempt to overcome this contradiction by promoting export-led growth. but for much of the world to pursue export-led growth, there will have to be economies that are willing to run large 59 trade deficits. in the deficit countries, either the private sector or the government has to run large deficits, leading to rising private or public debts over time. sooner or later, the deficit countries will be hit by financial crises as rising debts become unsustainable. during the current “recovery”, this basic contradiction has not in any way been resolved. on the contrary, fiscal deficits in western countries and china’s real estate bubble are setting up the world for a potentially more devastating crisis. how will the evolving global capitalist crisis affect the conditions of global class struggle? this is the basic political question confronting global working classes. what has happened to the grave diggers of capitalism? in the communist manifesto, marx and engels famously predicted that capitalist development would inevitably lead to the growth of the proletarianized working class and prepare the necessary conditions for the working class to organize economically and politically. as the organized working classes grow in size and strength, they argued, eventually they will prove themselves the grave diggers of capitalism (marx and engels 1978). nearly one and a half centuries after the communist manifesto, what has happened? the late 19th and early 20th century saw the rapid growth of working class movements and socialist political parties throughout europe. however, as western working class movements gained strength politically, their stake in the existing capitalist system has also increased. reformist tendencies (known as “revisionism”) gradually became dominant within the european socialist parties (the “second international” parties). after the second world war, european socialist parties officially abandoned revolutionary objectives and committed themselves to incremental reforms within the capitalist system. the russian bolshevik party was the only major party within the “second international” that remained committed to the revolutionary overthrow of capitalism. during the first world war, lenin attempted to analyze and understand the phenomenon of “revisionism”. lenin argued that in the “imperialist” era, western capitalism benefited from “super profits” exploited from the colonies and semicolonies. the western capitalists would then use a portion of the super profits to buy off the working class leaders, or the “labor aristocracies”. lenin argued that the colonial super profits constituted the material basis of revisionism (lenin, 1916). after the second world war, a growing marxist literature followed the leninist tradition and further argued that because of “unequal exchanges” and the operations of the “capitalist world system”, western capitalist wealth had been largely based on the exploitation of the peripheries. the so-called “technological revolutions” had basically been different ways to create world market monopolies that would allow a few “core” capitalist states to extract surplus value from the rest of the world (emmanuel, 1972; amin, 1974; wallerstein, 1979). can global capitalism be saved? “exit strategies” for capitalism or humanity 60 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research however, neither the super profits nor the unequal exchanges had succeeded in maintaining permanent social peace in the west. through long-term economic and political struggles, the western working classes had been able to secure important concessions from the capitalist classes, winning a growing range of economic, social, and political rights. by the 1960s, these working class gains had begun to put pressure on capitalist profits, threatening to undermine the basic conditions of capitalist accumulation. neoliberalism was the global capitalist response to this crisis. neoliberalism is a significant world historical development. it clearly demonstrates that global capitalism has developed to such a point that it is no longer possible for capitalism to simultaneously meet the basic requirements of capital accumulation while accommodating the historically determined demands of the working classes in the core capitalist states. in other words, the second international reformism (or the social contract) that had secured basic social peace within western capitalism since the mid-20th century has run into irreconcilable contradictions and is therefore historically bankrupt. another major development in the neoliberal era has to do with the changing balance of global economic forces. the relocation of global capital to exploit cheap labour forces in the “emerging markets” has been a major component of the neoliberal project. however this has led to the large formations of working classes in the “semi-periphery” (the geographical zone in the capitalist world system that has a position, in terms of the world division of labour and political strength, between the core and the periphery). over time, the semi-periphery working classes will demand economic, social and political rights comparable to those enjoyed by the western working classes. this development, once it happens, will presumably dismantle the global system of unequal exchange (which has been based on the super exploitation of the peripheral working classes) and therefore destroy the material foundation of western labor aristocracies. the current intensification of class struggles, such as in europe, could thus mark the beginning of a new historical era. it is no longer possible for european capitalism to accommodate both the historically established “social contracts” (most importantly pensions and health care commitments) and the requirements of capital accumulation. this contradiction has manifested itself in the form of fiscal crises throughout europe. the european capitalist classes are now attempting to impose the entire burden of adjustment onto the working classes in order to reestablish favourable conditions for capital accumulation by creating a new regime of cheap labour. the current struggle is therefore a life-and-death question for both the capitalist classes and the working classes. for the working classes, they will have to either fight back or eventually accept the loss of the historic gains made since the 19th century. indeed, it is quite possible that the european working classes might 61 lose the impending battle. the basic problem is that after a century of dominance of social democratic reformism, currently no effective revolutionary political force is playing a significant role in european working class politics. as a result, the european working classes have politically failed to break free from the historical limitations of capitalism, in the process coming to terms with capital. if the capitalist classes succeed in depriving the european workers of their historic gains, their “victory” could yet prove to be no more than a pyrrhic one. if the capitalist classes manage to impose massive declines of living standards onto the european working classes, this would dramatically reduce the european-wide effective demand and, in turn, reduce the export demand for “emerging market” economies. the decline of global effective demand could then lead to a global depression. as such, the economic crisis could then evolve into a general social and political crisis. under the second possible scenario, some effective revolutionary political forces may emerge in europe in the next few years, breaking the current political stalemate. under this scenario, the european working classes would undertake effective, unified struggles to make a decisive break with the existing capitalist order, moving towards the general socialization of the basic means of production and democratization of state power (in other words, establishing the “dictatorship of the proletariat”). the new socialist powers would then redirect the economy towards meeting peoples’ basic needs and ecological sustainability. if such a scenario does unfold, europe could emerge as the center of the 21st century global socialist revolution. the most likely scenario, though, is for europe to repeat the pattern that has been established in the neoliberal era. the european working classes would wave off defensive struggles against capitalist attacks. as a result, the european working classes would suffer from some declines in living standards but manage to maintain most of their historic gains. the setbacks for the working classes, however, would prove to be inadequate to revive the european capitalism which would sink into an increasingly deeper accumulation crisis. in other words a slow motion, but increasingly deeper, vicious circle. from a global perspective, under such a scenario, the european working classes would play an important role in weakening but not defeating global capitalism. the decisive battleground of global class struggle will then likely take place in other parts of the world. it is the global semi-periphery (china, india, russia, and latin america) that could prove to be the focus of global capitalist contradictions. over the past two or three decades, capitalist development in the semi-periphery has depended upon (to different degrees) super exploitation of a cheap domestic labour force, intensive exploitation of material resources and the environment, based on exports to western markets. these factors are no longer possible. in the coming years, the semi-peripheral capitalist economies will probably encounter shrinking can global capitalism be saved? “exit strategies” for capitalism or humanity 62 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research western markets, rising tides of working class struggle, resource depletion and an increasingly devastating environmental crisis. the combination of these contradictions may lead to the breakdown of the semi-peripheral capitalist regimes and potentially a general revolutionary crisis. the surge of revolutionary struggles in the semi-periphery could decisively change the dynamics of global class struggle. china: the key battleground of global class struggle? within the semi-periphery, china may emerge as the key battleground. china is already the world’s second largest economy and under the current trend will replace the u.s. to become the world’s largest economy within a decade. in the neoliberal era, china has become the centre of global industrial production, playing a central role in the global division of labor. china has become one of the major markets of energy and raw materials for latin america, the middle east, russia, and africa. china is the main importer of capital goods from germany, japan and south korea. china is also the leading supplier of low and medium-valued manufactured goods to the world market, especially to the u.s. market. in a way, then, the entire global capitalist market now works around china. likewise, china is also at the very centre of global ecological contradictions. chinese capitalist development has caused enormous devastation to china’s own environment and china has overtaken the u.s. to become the world’s largest energy consumer and greenhouse gas emitter. as china now accounts for fully one quarter of the world’s total carbon dioxide emissions, it is virtually impossible to resolve the global climate change crisis without china being committed to large absolute emission reductions. how did china turn from a revolutionary socialist state in the 1960s and 1970s into a major pillar of global capitalism today? in short, after the counter-revolutionary coup in 1976 (when radical maoist leaders were arrested), the emerging bureaucratic capitalist class took over and consolidated political power. in the 1980s, the state sector working class continued to enjoy many socialist rights and remained strong at the factory level. instead of organizing a direct, frontal attack on the working class that would be politically costly and might not succeed, the chinese bureaucratic capitalist class adopted—in line with mao’s revolutionary approach—a strategy of surrounding the cities with the countryside. china’s “economic reform” started with the privatization of agriculture. with the dismantling of the collective peoples’ communes, hundreds of millions of “surplus workers” in the rural areas were made available for capitalist exploitation. foreign and domestic capitalist enterprises grew explosively, profiting from china’s cheap labor force, low taxes and lack of social and environmental regulations. by the 1990s, the capitalist sector has overtaken the state sector to become the dominant economic force. the chinese government was ready to push for massive privatization in the cities. tens 63 of millions of state workers were laid off. those who were employed were deprived of any remaining socialist protections. however, the very success of chinese capitalism may have prepared the conditions for its eventual downfall. first of all, the state sector working class (including the laid off state sector workers) has developed political experience in both the socialist period and the capitalist period. this rich historical experience has contributed to a dramatic increase in class consciousness and organizational capacity among china’s state sector workers. in recent years, the state sector workers have organized many anti-privatization struggles and many are led by activists influenced by marxist-leninist-maoist ideas.6 by contrast, the migrant working class (the workers who have their origin in the countryside and work in the new capitalist sector) remains politically inexperienced. in recent years, however, migrant workers have also developed the consciousness to demand more economic and social rights (not yet political rights or socialism). as chinese capitalist accumulation continues to deplete rural surpluses of labour and a new generation of migrants increasingly considers themselves as “workers” rather than “peasants”, the objective balance of class power could increasingly shift in favour of the working class, encouraging migrant workers to get organized and fight for economic and social rights. in addition, under capitalist development, many among the petty bourgeoisie (or the urban “middle class”) have also suffered from declining living standards. many cannot afford to buy an apartment in the city. several college graduates cannot find jobs and have to live in slum-like conditions. the proletarianization of the petty bourgeoisie has contributed to the rise of the intellectual left in china. a growing number of young people have turned into marxist-leninist-maoists. the future of china depends on whether political unity can be developed between state sector workers, migrant workers and the proletarianized petty bourgeoisie. if such a unity does take shape, it may become a political force that the chinese capitalist class cannot defeat. is it conceivable that the chinese capitalist class could undertake certain social reforms to accommodate rising class tensions and redirect chinese capitalism onto a more “sustainable” path? over the past few years, the hu jintao-wen jiabao administration has been discussing building a so-called “harmonious society” with less inequality. in reality, despite some minor policy adjustments, economic and social inequality has continued to widen. for several reasons, meaningful social reform is unlikely to be achieved. first, much of the chinese capitalist wealth has its origin in the theft of state and collective assets from the socialist era. the entire ruling class is thoroughly corrupt and, at the local level, political power increasingly rests upon cooperation 6 on the class consciousness and anti-privatization struggle of the state sector workers, see weil (2010). can global capitalism be saved? “exit strategies” for capitalism or humanity 64 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research with local mafias. in this context, the central government has little ability to discipline the ruling class. even if the central government cares about the long-term sustainability of capitalism, it does not have the ability or will to force any significant capitalist group to make major concessions. second, despite the rapid growth of the chinese economy, china has failed to make inroads into the truly high value added segments of global commodity chains. china now relies upon foreign capital for almost all key technological areas in industry. without access to the monopolistic profits associated with the high value added activities, chinese capitalism will have to rely upon cheap labour forces to maintain its global “competitive advantage”. in the future, as the chinese working class gets organized and demands a growing range of rights, chinese capitalism may no longer be able to maintain social stability without in some way undermining capitalist accumulation.7 third, and potentially the most important, both chinese capitalist accumulation and global capitalist accumulation have rested upon the relentless exploitation of the environment. as the global ecological system approaches total collapse, any further expansion of capitalism is now in fundamental conflict with the long-term survival of the humanity. global catastrophes or “exit strategies” for humanity? in socialism: utopian and scientific, engels summarized the basic contradiction of capitalism as one between objective socialization of production and the capitalist system of private appropriation. this contradiction had led to increasingly more violent crises, demonstrating the inherent conflict between capitalist relations of production and the objective development of social productive forces. such a contradiction could only be resolved through the establishment of a more democratic and egalitarian form of social relations of production, based on social ownership of the means of production and rational economic planning. in other words, socialism (engels, 1978 [1880]). for classical marxists, socialism would prove to be a superior social system by developing social productive forces more rationally than capitalism. however, the greatest challenge confronting humanity today is no longer economic crisis but the fact that after centuries of relentless capital accumulation the global ecological system is now on the verge of complete collapse. consider the following aspects of the global ecological crisis (climate action tracker 2010; speth 2010; wild 2010): • according to the “climate action tracker,” the climate actions pledged by a good many national governments will commit the world to a warming of 3 7 on how china has failed to rise to the technology frontier, see hart-landsberg (2010). 65 degrees celsius by the end of the 21st century, steering the world onto a path of unprecedented catastrophes. • according to the united nations, by 2025 about 1.8 billion people will be living in countries with absolute water scarcity and about two-thirds of the world population could be under conditions of water stress. • the world is currently losing soil 10 to 20 times faster than it is being replenished, threatening the very foundation of world agriculture. • a recent foreign policy article argued that the world could face peak phosphorus production in the near future. phosphorus is a key input in the production of fertilizers. the authors warned that “if we fail to meet this challenge, humanity faces a malthusian trap of widespread famine on a scale that we have not yet experienced.” • about half the world’s wetlands and a third of the mangroves are gone. an estimated 90 percent of large predatory fish are gone, and 75 percent of marine fisheries are now over-fished or fished to capacity. • twenty percent of ocean corals are gone and another 20 percent are severely threatened. half the world’s temperate and tropical forests no loner exist. species are disappearing at rates about 1,000 times faster than normal. how may the rapidly developing global ecological crisis be dealt with? apologists claim that capitalism may be made “sustainable” or “green” by promoting “green technologies” or “eco-efficiency”. this argument may be illustrated by the following “ipat” formula: i = p * a * t the formula suggests that environmental impacts (t) are determined by population (p), “affluence” (a, that is, gdp per capita), and technology (t, which measures the environmental impact per unit of gdp). according to basic laws of ecology, ecological sustainability requires stable or falling environmental impacts. according to the ipat formula, unlimited economic growth (that is, capital accumulation) can be made compatible with ecological sustainability if technological progress leads to increasingly higher eco-efficiency, that is, falling t, which presumably falls more rapidly than the growth of gdp. the fundamental problem with the “green capitalist” argument is that it fails to understand, on the one hand, why uncan global capitalism be saved? “exit strategies” for capitalism or humanity 66 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research der capitalism there has been a powerful tendency towards endless accumulation of capital and, on the other hand, the insurmountable physical and political-economic limitations of “eco-efficiency” as a countervailing factor. all human civilizations have been based on the existence of a substantial surplus product (the part of total social product that is above the population’s basic consumption and the means of production required to maintain society’s simple reproduction). in pre-capitalist societies, the surplus product was used by ruling elites primarily for luxury consumption and various wasteful activities (such as war, religious rituals, or grand imperial projects), leaving little for the expansion of production. modern capitalism is unique in that it is the only socio-economic system that has ever existed in human history where market relations have become dominant in every aspect of social life. the dominance of market relations leads to universal and unending competition between producers, forcing every producer to use a substantial portion of the surplus-value (profit) to engage in capital accumulation and expand the scale of production. this dynamic, once it is dominant, becomes a self-sustaining economic force reproducing itself on increasingly larger scales. in the world market, world-wide competition forces all national states to pursue as much economic growth as possible. those nations that fail to compete often suffer economic and political crises or are defeated militarily. against this powerful tendency towards unlimited capital accumulation (represented by increasingly larger p and a), what has been the counteracting force? green capitalist advocates argue that market functions generate the most efficient economic system. for such a view, resource scarcity through rising prices will stimulate innovation leading to resource-saving technologies that can lower t and offset the growth of p and a. this argument, however, was found to be flawed as early as the 19th century by british economist william stanley jevons. jevons argued that any resource-saving technology, by temporarily reducing the consumption of a resource, would lead to lower price, which would then encourage people to consume more of the resource. the perverse phenomenon was known as the “jevons paradox”. jevons’ paradox could explain why in reality, despite improvements in resource efficiency (that is, falling resource consumption per unit of economic output), overall resource consumption keeps growing persistently.8 natural resources are, after all, “priced” in a capitalist economy, however flawed the pricing mechanisms might be. by contrast, generations of material waste from human activities or human pollutants are treated as “free” by capitalist markets. in economic terms, the ecological system is treated as an “externality” that is considered to have zero costs 8 for an explanation of jevons’ paradox, see orford (2010). 67 in a free market system. in a capitalist system, government regulations provide the only countervailing mechanism against externalities. however, as environmental regulations tend to increase the costs associated with accumulation, governments will typically only regulate those pollutants that do not significantly affect business profitability. thus, even on national scales, government environmental regulations are often inadequate and ineffective. on a global scale, any national capitalist economy that seriously regulates the environment will increase its own accumulation costs and suffer a competitive disadvantage in the global market. thus, when the question concerns global environmental problems (such as climate change), few capitalist economies are willing to undertake the necessary actions. international agreements are supposed to help solve this dilemma by sharing the costs among national capitalist states. however, major capitalist powers rarely agree upon how the costs should be shared and few want to contemplate any restrictions on their own accumulation. the recent united nations conference fiasco on climate change at copenhagen demonstrates this clearly. in addition to the political-economic limits on “t”, there are also fundamental physical-ecological limits. all human economic activities have to do with either physical or chemical transformations of the natural world, and thus necessarily require the consumption of material resources and lead to the generation of material wastes. it is therefore not possible to invent an economic activity with zero environmental impacts. unlimited economic growth will inevitably lead to unlimited environmental impacts. in the long run, the only way to achieve ecological sustainability is to develop an economy with stable material flows (or a “steady-state” economy) that can meet the world population’s basic needs and are consistent with the normal operations of ecological systems. the capitalist system is taking humanity down the path of global ecological catastrophe, which threatens the destruction of civilization. at this critical threshold of the early 21st century, what will be humanity’s “exit strategy” for survival? under capitalism, society’s surplus product is under the control of many big and small capitalists that engage in ruthless competition against one another. this competition generates an enormous, immensely irrational social force that is beyond any individual capitalist’s control, forcing businesses to pursue ruthless exploitation of both nature and humanity. the only way for humanity to escape this ridiculous trap, an enormous irony of alienation (that the very social force created by human beings is now turned against humanity itself ), is to establish society’s collective and self-conscious control over the social surplus product—that is to say, over the economy and over the makeup of society itself. as classical marxism argued, this control would in turn require social ownership of the means of production and the development of democratic, rational economic planning that determines the can global capitalism be saved? “exit strategies” for capitalism or humanity 68 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research size, composition and use of society’s surplus product. it is often claimed that the critics of capitalism have failed to provide a viable alternative to capitalism. this shortcoming is allegedly a fatal flaw that invalidates any attempt to move beyond capitalism. such a claim, however, despite its vacuousness, only remains valid or legitimate so long as the capitalist system remains a viable historical option. since the continued operation of capitalism is now in fundamental conflict with the survival of the ecosphere and humanity, the terms of debate have been fundamentally transformed. references amin, samir. 1974. accumulation on a world scale: a critique of the theory of underdevelopment. new york and london: monthly review press. bea. us bureau of economic analysis. 2010. national income and product account tables and fixed assets tables. website: http://www.bea.gov. cecchetti, stephen g., m. s. mohanty, and fabrizio sampolli. 2010. “the future of public debt: prospects and implications.” website: http://www.bis.org/publ/work300.pdf. climate action tracker. 2010. “high chance to exceed 3°c despite recent developments.” website: http://www.climateactiontracker.org. crotty, james. 2000. “trading state-led prosperity for market-led stagnation: from the golden age to global neoliberalism.” the political economy research institute of university of massachusetts amherst, published study 7. website: http://www.peri.umass.edu/fileadmin/ pdf/published_study/ps7.pdf. emmanuel, arghiri. 1972. unequal exchange: a study of the imperialism of trade. new york: monthly review press. engels, friedrich. 1978[1880]. “socialism: utopian and scientific,” in robert c. tucker (ed.), the marx-engels reader, pp. 683-717. new york: w. w. norton & company. gordon, david m., thomas weisskopf, and samuel bowles. 2007. “power, accumulation, and crisis: the rise and demise of the postwar social structure of accumulation,” in the union for radical political economics, the imperiled economy, book 1, pp. 43-58. new york: monthly review press. hart-landsberg, martin. 2010. “the chinese reform experience: a critical assessment.” review of radical political economics (forthcoming). imf. international monetary fund. 2010. world economic outlook update, july 2010. website: http://www.imf.org/external/ns/cs.aspx?id=29. 69 lenin, vladimir ilyich. 1916. imperialism, the highest stage of capitalism. website: http://www. marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1916/imp-hsc. li, minqi. 2009. the rise of china and the demise of the capitalist world economy. london: pluto press; new york: monthly review press. li, minqi, feng xiao, and andong zhu. 2007. “long wages, institutional changes, and historical trends: a study of the long-term movement of the profit rate in the capitalist worldeconomy.” journal of world systems research xiii:1: 33-54. maddison, angus. 2003. the world economy: historical statistics. paris: organisation for economic co-operation and development. marx, karl and friedrich engels. 1978[1848]. “manifesto of the communist party,” in robert c. tucker (ed.), the marx-engels reader, pp. 469-500. new york: w. w. norton & company. minsky, hyman p. 2008[1986]. stabilizing an unstable economy. new york: mcgraw-hill. orford, lionel. 2010. “jevons’ law: enforcing the age of energy decline.” website: http://www. energybulletin.net/node/51158. speth, gus. 2010. “towards a new economy and a new politics.” website: http://www.energybulletin.net/node/53202. state statistical bureau, people’s republic of china. 2009. statistical yearbook of china 2009. website: http://www.stats.gov.cn. ____. 2010a. zhonghua renmin gongheguo 2009 nian guomin jingji he shehui fazhan tongji gongbao (statistical communiqué of the people’s republic of china on national economic and social development 2009). website: http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjgb/ndtjgb/qgndtjgb/ t20100225_402622945.htm. ____. 2010b. “4 yuefen guomin jingji zhuyao zhibiao shuju (the main indicators of the national economy in april)”, may 11, 2010. website: http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjfx/jdfx/ t20100511_402641475.htm. wallerstein, immanuel. 1979. the capitalist world-economy. cambridge: cambridge university press. weil, robert. 2010. “a house divided: china after 30 years of ‘reforms’,” in economic and political weekly (ed.), china after 1978, pp. 209-232. hyderabad, india: orient blackswan. wild, matthew. 2010. “peak soil – it is like peak oil, only worse.” website: http://www.energybulletin.net/52788. world bank. 2010. world development indicators online. website: http://data.worldbank.org/datacatalog/world-development-indicators. can global capitalism be saved? “exit strategies” for capitalism or humanity 70 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research xie, andy. 2010. “trapped inside a property bubble,” january 10, 2010. website: http://english. caing.com/2010-01-10/100106991.html. xin jing bao (new beijing daily). 2010a. “laodong baochou zhan gdp bili lianxu 22 nian xiajiang, yi yingxiang shehui wending (labor income share of gdp had fallen for 22 years, threatening social stability)”, may 12, 2010. website: http://finance.eastmoney.com/ news/1346,2010051275119040.html. multiple files are bound together in this pdf package. adobe recommends using adobe reader or adobe acrobat version 8 or later to work with documents contained within a pdf package. by updating to the latest version, you’ll enjoy the following benefits: • efficient, integrated pdf viewing • easy printing • quick searches don’t have the latest version of adobe reader? click here to download the latest version of adobe reader if you already have adobe reader 8, click a file in this pdf package to view it. http://www.adobe.com/products/acrobat/readstep2.html 978-1-926958-01-9 139 play review multinational [g]rape corporation written and directed by ozgur cinar, performed by ozgur cinar and chara berk. 2010. reviewed by: aaron henry1 “welcome to the market time. everything has turned into a market today ergo it is not that surprising to see urinals exhibited in museums”. enter multinational [g]rape corporations (mgc), the play that took this year’s ottawa fringe theatre and arts festival by storm, winning the outstanding original work award. yet reviews of this play, for the most part, have entirely missed what is truly outstanding about it. while several reviews have praised the actors, who were indeed electrifying, or marveled over the irreverence and the spectacle of the play, none of them have discussed the meaning of this play. the meaning has been largely shoved aside, one reviewer even went so far as to suggest that “it defies explanation” (marr, 2010). this is disappointing because it is in the structure of the play where cinar’s brilliance, the play’s originality and its message lie. it is, then, the architecture of the play that needs to be given attention, if mgc is going to be reviewed for not just its spectacle but for its internal content. however, the two are necessarily interdependent. the set of the play is austere. it features a table and two chairs upstage, a suitcase full of different props and two squares on the floor formed by red-tape labeled security. the play opens with a man and a women vomiting through a slit in the closed curtain while eating and drinking behind it, a married couple who are the key subjects of the play. the play scrolls through many different locales in capitalist society, ranging from the interior of an immigration office where the man is made to pay over and over again to gain permanent residency; a doctor’s office where tapeworms are removed from the woman—played indomitably by chara berk— 1 aaron henry is a ma student at carleton university in the department of political economy. he can be reached at ahenry2@connect.carleton.ca multinational [g]rape corporation 140 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research where, as a consequence, the doctor informs her of not eating organic food; the first date between the married couple, to a scene of protest against exploitation. each of these scenes closes with the couple’s retreat to the table. the next scene begins with the transformation of the woman, following a sound cue that imitates defecation, into an advertisement for different products and services ranging from fair-trade coffee, cds or for a holiday vacation. following this metamorphosis of the woman into a commodity, the couple retreats into their respective security boxes where the man, played by cinar, attempts to commit suicide over and over again to no avail. this structure has a number of important effects that taken together form cinar’s critique of capitalist society—a critique that goes far beyond being merely anti-consumerist and anti-security, as other reviewers have commented on. foremost, the play is presented as a number of instances between subjects. the thread of unity that binds these instances is not that of unified characters with a linear narrative but the existence of the market within these relations. this is perhaps epitomized by the scene where the man applies for a study permit and then a permanent residency card to integrate into canada. this scene unfolds as primarily a monetary 141 relationship between the man and the canadian immigration officer who remains alienated from the man and treats him from a distance established by both the cash relationship and the sterile rationality of the bureaucracy. similarly, on the couple’s first date the romantic evening is disrupted as the woman laments that she must “take a dump” but that they can’t afford access to a toilet. the scene sublimates the tender moment of the couple back into the market. the love between them cannot exist without the commodification of the most basic and biological human needs. multinational [g]rape corporation 142 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research mgc produces its scenes around subjects that are produced by market relations. this forecloses on the unified character one would find in the classic plays of shakespeare, jonson, wilde, synge, etc. and substitutes this character for a fragmented subject that develops and disappears in line with the market relations that cinar exposes. the play progresses not as a linear narrative but as a process of interaction between fragmented subjects as the man and woman transform before the audience, into police officers, immigration officials, doctors, waiters and lovers. the subjects are then formed in context to the power relations that develop within capitalist society and, as such, they develop and disappear discontinuously and through this disclose the totality of these relations. this structure conveys the message that the market has fully crept into social life, to the degree where one is at once an advertisement and a person. living under these conditions produces a number of contradictions that constitute the insanity and hypocrisy of living in capitalist society. market society then, produces not only fragmented subjects but the complete fragmentation of social life. this fragmentation allows the brutality of capitalism to colonize the human condition. as cinar laments, we get urinals next to the wonders of human history, cosmetics next to the death tolls in afghanistan and iraq, the marketing of vacations alongside brutal exploitation and dictatorship. cinar reveals the societal response to this through the couples retreat to their own private security boxes, provided to them by the market. in this sense, the complete commodification of social life finds its terminal point of expression in the partitioning of our own social beings from these processes and our own feeble attempts to secure ourselves from them. the consequences mgc aptly shows is the reinforcement of our own alienation from ourselves and from each other, precisely because we all form part of capitalist society. the man, in particular, is a paragon of this reality as he attempts suicide in his own private security box to end his imprisonment from the market only to be distracted by the very processes he revolts against in disgust. his repeated failure to commit suicide is caused by his inability to see that he himself constitutes part of this market society. cinar in fact lays this theme out quite clearly and succinctly in the opening lines when the woman declares “we are the flowers of the commercial world. we are the vomit of the commercial world”. they, like all of us, are at once both of these things, nurtured and cared for as consumers, the subjects of society and at once the objects of it the refuse, the labourers who are exploited to constitute its existence. the tragedy and insanity is that the couple cannot recognize themselves as the subjects that constitute the processes that transform them into these wretched objects. 143 this is one of the central messages of mgc. the structure of the play conforms to that of capitalist society insofar as capitalist society cannot be understood through a single narrative. instead it can only be understood under the fragmentary conditions its relations of exploitation and alienation produce. superficially this reality appears disjointed, chaotic, and beyond explanation. however, with greater focus we see ourselves as the subjects of capitalist society that constitute these relations. our imprisonment to the market stems from the fact that we ourselves play a part, much like the man and woman, in the exploitation and alienation that constitute capitalist society. in the end we cannot understand this reality; we have after-all “only applied for cleaner, dish-washer or waiter positions”. we don’t understand that in these positions we ourselves are both the subject and object of these processes. cinar’s play is a scream to see outlining this insanity. as such, cinar’s play constitutes an important critique of capitalism in canadian society and warrants engagement by all. references marr, den. fully fringed, june 28th, 2010. www.fullyfringed.ca photos by a. erdem ozcan. multinational [g]rape corporation 144 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research whole book pdf | 147 québec solidaire: a québécois approach to building a broad left party richard fidler1 a number of attempts have been made in recent years to launch new parties and processes, addressing a broad left or popular constituency, that are programmatically anti-neoliberal if not anti-capitalist, some of them self-identifying as part of an international effort to create a “socialism of the 21st century.” they vary widely in origins, size, social composition, and influence. the process has gone furthest in a number of latin american countries; among the best known are the united socialist party of venezuela (psuv), led by hugo chávez, and the bolivian movement towards socialism–political instrument of the sovereignty of the peoples (mas-ipsp), led by evo morales. efforts in western europe, such as italy’s refoundation party, germany’s die linke, or france’s parti de gauche originated in part in splits in the traditional parties of “20th century socialism,” in avowed rejection of both stalinism and social democracy. many of these parties include members who in the past were associated with one or another of the marxist currents identified historically with trotsky’s anti-stalinist legacy. in france, the nouveau parti anti-capitaliste (npa) was initiated under their aegis. parallel developments have not yet occurred in the united states or canada, where anticapitalist ideas and movements have less presence in the political landscape today than they had a century ago. however, as it does in so many respects, quebec constitutes something of an exception. a new left party, québec solidaire, created during the past decade, is attracting considerable interest and growing support as an anti-neoliberal alternative to quebec’s three capitalist parties. while not explicitly anti-capitalist or socialist, it defines itself 1  richard fidler is an independent researcher and writer who publishes the blog life on the left (www.lifeonleft.blogspot.com). he is based in ottawa and can be reached at: rfidler_8@ sympatico.ca. thanks are due to john riddell and david mandel for their critical comments on an earlier draft. the usual caveats apply. québec solidaire: a québécois approach to building a broad left party 148 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times as a party “resolutely of the left, feminist, ecologist, altermondialiste,2 pacifist, democratic and sovereigntist.” this paper will outline how this party originated, describe how it functions, and explore some major challenges it faces and how it is confronting them. the quebec exception quebec’s political evolution has always followed a distinct trajectory within the canadian social formation. a crucial determinant has been the province’s character as the homeland of a distinct nation, with its own territory, language, culture, historical tradition and a well-defined national consciousness as a minority people within canada and north america. until well past the mid-20th century, french-canadian nationalism was essentially defensive, focused on protecting the autonomy of quebec, the last major enclave of the francophone presence in canada, against involvement in imperialist wars and the increasing encroachment on the province’s constitutional jurisdiction by the federal state with its expanding economic and social functions. industrialization and the concomitant urbanization and growth of trade unions aggravated these tensions, disrupting the social and political culture of a francophone population long dependent on church and parish for the provision of basic social and community services. in the 1960s a new, more assertive nationalist dynamic gained force as quebec rapidly moved to modernize its industrial infrastructure, nationalized hydro-electric power resources and expanded and secularized its education, health and social welfare systems. a large provincial state bureaucracy developed, increasingly directed to stimulating the expansion of a skilled labour force and the growth of a francophone bourgeoisie through the provision of financial and other assistance. quebec pushed increasingly — but unsuccessfully — for constitutional changes that would give it greater autonomy within the federation, especially in areas crucial to its national identity and development. union membership expanded exponentially. a veritable cultural revolution occurred with the appearance of many new radical publications and other media, many of them raising the demand for quebec autonomy, political sovereignty or independence. on the left, pro-independence movements sprouted, their members inspired by the post-war afroasian decolonization and, closer to home, the socialist ideology of the cuban revolutionists. 2  in french, those who advocate “another world” of global justice and solidarity. | 149 national consciousness and class consciousness have maintained a close and reciprocal relationship in quebec in recent decades. but this social ferment, both a product and promoter of rising québécois national consciousness, largely bypassed the parties of the existing “20th century” canadian left. their historical failure to sink mass roots in quebec was directly related to their programmatic orientation toward strengthening the canadian state and their indifference to quebec’s national oppression and/or hostility to québécois nationalist sentiment. the regina manifesto, the founding document of canadian socialdemocracy, omitted any reference to the quebec national question.3 the communist party expelled québécois members who developed a proautonomy interpretation of the party’s formal support of quebec’s right to self-determination.4 the labour-based new democratic party, founded in 1961, has been unwilling to embrace any fundamental alteration to canada’s existing institutional structure that would reflect quebec’s national character, or even to develop a coherent approach that differed significantly from the constitutional priorities of the federal government of the day.5 soon after its founding, its quebec section voted to form a distinct parti socialiste du québec (psq). the psq advocated that quebec and canada be constitutionally recognized as “associated states.” if such an agreement proved impossible, it said, “quebec should declare its independence.”6 but the psq was upstaged on its nationalist flank by the pro-independence rassemblement pour l’indépendance nationale (rin), while the quebec trade unions were still unprepared to drop their longstanding support of the quebec liberals in favour of independent labour political action. the psq dissolved in the late 1960s. in the absence of a viable left-wing alternative sympathetic to québécois national aspirations, this consciousness was politically channeled into support for the pro-sovereignty parti québécois. founded in the late 1960s, the pq came to hegemonize the national movement as its political expression. moreover, its increasing attraction for the leaderships of quebec’s three big union centrals — which gradually shifted to seeing the pq, and not the liberals, as their preferred vehicle for political 3  regina manifesto, 1933. the manifesto was adopted by the first “national” convention of the co-operative commonwealth federation (ccf). 4  henri gagnon, n.d. 5  for a summary of ndp positions in this regard, see cooke, 2004. for a critique of the ndp’s sherbrooke declaration, its most complete and recent statement on the quebec national question, see fidler, 2011b. see also fidler, 2011d. 6  parti socialiste du québec, 1966 québec solidaire: a québécois approach to building a broad left party 150 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times influence and reform — tended to eclipse early attempts by some union militants to found independent and anticapitalist political formations. a notable effort, the front d’action politique (frap), a radical municipal party initiated in part by the montréal section of the csn, foundered in the wake of the october 1970 crisis and repression. an upsurge in mass nationalist and pro-sovereignty sentiment fueled a radicalization in the labour movement that in the early 1970s saw all three labour centrals7 issue and debate anticapitalist manifestos. but the capitalist pq was the primary political beneficiary, although a nationalist left within the party that included some prominent union officials often had a problematic relationship to the party hierarchy. the pq project was, and remains, to achieve a bourgeois-nationalist form of state sovereignty associated — the political context permitting — with canada outside quebec, or if necessary functioning as a fully independent (but thoroughly capitalist) quebec state. the pq’s popular support derived from its advocacy of sovereignty, its strong defense of the french language, culture and national identity and, initially at least, its promise of social reforms. during its first term in office, the pq enacted some important reforms, particularly in the area of french-language rights, although its legislation in this regard has been subject to constant challenges and adverse court rulings over the years. but after a total of 18 years in government (1976-1985, 1994-2003), the party no longer inspires the hopes for change that it once did. pq governments have on occasion viciously attacked unions, as in 1982 when the lévesque government legislated a 20% reduction in the salaries of government workers. the pq has consistently supported anti-worker “free trade” and investment agreements and its governments have imposed harsh austerity programs. although opinion polls have registered high and remarkably consistent support for quebec independence,8 the pq has failed to win its two sovereignty referendums. equally important, ongoing developments in bourgeois politics — such as the 1982 unilateral patriation of canada’s constitution without quebec’s consent; the 1990 defeat of the meech lake accord; or the federal parliament’s enactment of the clarity act in the wake of the narrow 1995 referendum defeat — have signalled the 7  the three centrals were the quebec federation of labour (ftq), the confederation of national trade unions (csn) and the teachers’ union, the ceq (now the centrale des syndicats du québec, or csq). 8  opinion polls indicate that even today more than 40% of québécois support independence (more than those who declare support for the pq), and a substantial majority favour greater autonomy for quebec. | 151 lack of sympathy in canada’s ruling circles not only for quebec sovereignty but for any meaningful constitutional recognition of quebec’s national identity, let alone unfettered provincial autonomy in jurisdictions essential to that identity. the new francophone bourgeoisie that has developed since the sixties, with state support (both provincial and federal), functions largely as a subset of the canadian bourgeoisie and no major component favours quebec sovereignty. today the parti québécois has less appetite for independence, although the goal of “sovereignty” is still article one in its program. doubts are growing about the party’s ability to capture enough popular support for its program to create the “winning conditions” for a successful referendum vote on sovereignty. the pq’s commitment to working within the neoliberal order, which has often brought it into sharp conflict with the unions, has fueled disenchantment with the party among the very social layers that are the driving force of the national movement. however, a credible left alternative to the parti québécois was slow to emerge within the broad québécois nationalist and left milieu. until the early 1980s, when they unceremoniously collapsed, the mao-stalinist currents that largely dominated the far left for a decade opposed quebec sovereignty, which they regarded as a purely bourgeois objective dividing the “canadian” working class. and although they opposed the pq, they also opposed proposals within the trade unions in favour of establishing an independent working-class party, advocating instead, in true sectarian fashion, the constitution of their own “proletarian party.”9 like the ccf and pro-moscow cp before them, this “far left” was ideologically defined around international events and alliances that had little or no resonance in the conditions of quebec, where the class struggle tends to unfold within a nationalist framework of opposition to linguistic and cultural oppression. there was always, of course, a smaller left that favoured independence and rejected the pq and its capitalist program. sporadic attempts were made in the 1980s to build new parties of the left, but without lasting success. the trade unions remained resistant to proposals to engage in political action independent of the pq. and during the 1980s and 1990s, the major labour centrals initiated — with political support and generous tax breaks from both levels of government — investment funds that have enmeshed the unions in the financial industry, company management structures and other strategic “partnerships” with capital. 9  for a critical analysis of this experience, see moreau, 1986. for a more extended analysis, see dubuc, 2003, especially chapters 3 and 4. québec solidaire: a québécois approach to building a broad left party 152 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times during the late 1990s, however, some cracks began to appear in the edifice of bourgeois sovereigntist hegemony in the left. feminists, the one broadly-based social movement that had largely survived the neoliberal onslaught of the 1980s — waging a successful defense of abortion rights, for example — organized a mass “march for bread and roses” that directly challenged lucien bouchard’s pq government and its “zero deficit” austerity program. they followed up with further demonstrations and, in 2000, sponsored a world march of women that mobilized tens of thousands in quebec and elsewhere. when the government rejected their modest demands for an increase in the minimum wage, women’s federation leader françoise david publicly mused on the need to create a “feminist left-wing political alternative” to the parti québécois. then, in 2001, tens of thousands mobilized at the quebec summit in opposition to the proposed free trade area of the americas. opponents of neoliberal globalization — “altermondialistes” as they are known in quebec — were soon joined by hundreds of thousands more in massive demonstrations in the lead-up to the 2003 u.s. invasion of iraq, the largest antiwar mobilization in quebec history. for the first time in decades, there was now a realistic potential for a new configuration of progressive forces. regroupment and fusion the initiative was taken — first separately, then in combination — by three far-left groups:10 the parti de la démocratie socialiste (pds) originated as the quebec section of the federal ndp. in 1995 it broke definitively from the ndp; adopted its new name; defined itself as “anti-capitalist, anti-neoliberal, feminist, internationalist and independentist”; and campaigned for a yes to sovereignty in the referendum. the pds was joined by some independent left-wing nationalists who had left the pq. members of gauche socialiste, a section of the trotskyist fourth international, were prominent in the pds leadership. the rassemblement pour une alternative politique (rap) was founded in 1998, in response to a public appeal for a “political alternative” issued in november 1997 by prominent left-wing personalities including former psq leader and union militant michel chartrand; pierre dubuc (editor of the popular independentist monthly l’aut’journal); and paul cliche, a journalist who in 1970 had led the left-wing municipal party 10  the following chronology borrows in part from dostie et al., 2006. see also lavallée, 2011, p. 202-14. | 153 frap in montréal. the rap later (in november 2000) voted to change its name to rassemblement pour l’alternative progressiste. the parti communiste du québec (pcq), the quebec section of the canadian cp, now led by individuals who had once been prominently associated with quebec’s mao-stalinist parties.11 in the 1998 general election, the rap ran seven candidates while the pds contested 97 ridings; their overall vote was small (36,000), although in jonquière the rap candidate michel chartrand took 15% of the popular vote against the pq’s premier lucien bouchard. in 2000, a joint public meeting in montréal organized by the pds, rap and pcq attracted some 650 persons to discuss “unity of the political left and progressive forces.” a liaison committee was set up by the three groups along with the bloc pot (a marijuana legalization group) and the quebec section of the green party of canada, with the objective of establishing common positions and actions. in april 2001, just days before the huge protest demonstrations at the pro-free trade québec summit of the americas, independent candidate paul cliche won 24% of the popular vote in a by-election in montréal’s mercier riding. his campaign, supported by the liaison committee, some trade unions and community organizations, indicated the positive potential of left unity. the liaison committee then became the coalition of the union des forces progressistes (ufp). in december 2001 the rap voted by a narrow majority at its congress to join the ufp.12 at a convention in june 2002 the ufp was founded as “a federated party that seeks to become a mass alternative to the parties of neoliberalism.” those attending included a large number of independent activists in addition to members of the pds, rap and pcq.13 at a subsequent policy convention in february 2003 the new party adopted a radical platform opposing free-trade agreements and calling for international solidarity (palestine, cuba, iraq), cancellation of third-world foreign debts, 11  the pcq separated from the canadian cp in 2005 when a majority of its members voted to support quebec independence. some members of the reconstituted quebec section of the canadian cp are members today of québec solidaire, but they do not constitute a recognized “collective” within qs. 12  rap founder pierre dubuc, in the minority, abandoned the project of building a political alternative to the pq. in june 2005, he joined with some trade union leaders and “left” pq members (péquistes) to found syndicalistes et progressistes pour un québec libre (spqlibre), which for a time was officially recognized as a “club” within the pq. 13  according to an internal ufp study cited by amir khadir, 56% of the members were under the age of 35 and 29% were under 29; 50% of them were first-time party members; there was a minor yet real presence of anglophone activists as well as several members of montreal’s cultural communities (amir khadir, interview by pascale dufour, march 2006), cited in dufour, 2003. québec solidaire: a québécois approach to building a broad left party 154 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times defence of the environment, extensive social and educational reforms, electoral reform, labour rights, first nations self-determination, and a constituent assembly to draft a constitution for a “progressive, republican, secular and democratic quebec.”14 the ufp adopted a pluralist structure recognizing the right of organized tendencies (“political entities”) to “promote specific orientations compatible with the platform and statutes of the ufp.” the pds was now a political entity called démocratie socialiste (later québec socialiste), although it soon dissolved as such. the rap, for its part, simply dissolved into the ufp, while the pcq became a recognized political entity within the new party. in the april 2003 general election the ufp, now registered as an official party, ran 73 candidates (26% were women) and obtained just over 40,000 votes — barely attaining the 1% of the popular vote required to qualify for partial rebate of expenses under the elections act. the highest vote was amir khadir’s 18% in mercier riding. this campaign was considered a success; some ufp candidates were endorsed by unions, and a post-election report noted that a considerable number of students had been recruited. the party now claimed a membership of some 1,800 members, almost double its membership in 2002. at a june 2003 meeting, the ufp council adopted an ambitious agenda of social movement participation, antiwar mobilizing, unification talks with the parti vert (a resuscitated green party), and fighting for an electoral regime of proportional representation to help overcome quebec’s “democratic deficit.” the members voted to investigate possible participation in municipal elections and creation of a “youth organization... both independent of and in solidarity with the ufp.” meanwhile, during the fall and winter of 2002-03, d’abord solidaires, a “non-partisan collective” of activists from the women’s and other social movements, had been formed independently of the ufp to mount a public campaign against a rise in right-wing politics that was aimed primarily against action démocratique du québec (adq), a party that split from the provincial liberals in the early 1990s on a pro-autonomy program and at one point in the months before the 2003 election was registering 40 percent support in public opinion polls on a platform centered on “family values” and “old-stock” québécois identity issues. d’abord solidaires was officially indifferent between the governing pq and the opposition liberals, not opposing a vote for either as a “lesser evil” to the adq. as it turned out, the adq polled just 18%, the pq was 14  see fidler, 2003. | 155 defeated — its vote dropped by 10 percentage points from its previous result — and the liberals led by jean charest formed the government.15 in may 2004, one of the three component collectives in d’abord solidaires, led by feminist leader françoise david and social housing activist françois saillant, founded option citoyenne (oc–citizens’ choice). it favoured political action to the left of the pq but initially rejected an invitation to join the ufp.16 david toured quebec promoting her book bien commun recherché (“seeking the common good”) and probing support for a new left party. david encountered much support for uniting the political forces to the left of the pq, and considerable openness to the idea of joining with the ufp in a new party — notwithstanding the reservations of many of her supporters, and david herself,17 about the ufp’s strong commitment to quebec independence. in december 2004 option citoyenne began negotiations with the ufp to explore the possibility of forming “a single progressive, ecologist and feminist party.” the year-long fusion process posed some major challenges to both groups. each had its distinct constituency or corporate culture. the ufp’s membership included young people from the global justice movement — internationalist and strong supporters of quebec independence, which they saw as essential to their anti-capitalist politics — along with an older layer of members, many with long experience in left and far-left politics. oc members, on the other hand, were primarily active within feminist and community organizations (60% were women) and in local grass-roots organizing around tenants’ rights, food and housing co-ops and the like, a milieu in which the politics of consensus and accommodation of conflicting views and interests are valued. oc members tended to radicalize around anti-poverty concerns, and were less likely to be concerned with quebec’s national question. but the ufp was adamant that the new party must advocate quebec independence. over a year, beginning in november 2004, option citoyenne held three “national [quebec] meetings” of its membership to develop a programmatic basis for negotiations with the ufp. draft position papers were circulated and resolutions adopted on feminism, democracy, plu15  in the 2007 election, the adq managed to displace the pq as official opposition until the following year’s election, when it was reduced to 7 seats. 16  ufp leader pierre dostie later explained that his party would have preferred that oc simply join the ufp. “but reality is very often more complex than we imagine. once we found that this political movement, given its composition and what it represented, had to comply with its own process, we sought areas of convergence and we entered into a dialogue.” à bâbord !, february-march, 2005. 17  david was once a member of en lutte, a mao-stalinist group that opposed quebec independence. québec solidaire: a québécois approach to building a broad left party 156 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times ralism and economic questions.18 a typical resolution declared that “a party of the common good, inspired by feminism” should be oriented around “values of social justice, equality, peace, solidarity, respect for the integrity of individuals and the environment, while recognizing the importance of struggles against forms of exclusion, racism, discrimination and violence, including those that continue to be exercised against women in the private and public sphere.” a resolution on economic issues, adopted unanimously, proposed that the “private-public” economic model be replaced by a “plural model” based on “the domestic economy” of family and gratuitous or volunteer services, the “social economy” of non-profit community or cooperative agencies, in addition to “private undertakings... that agree to function in accordance with collective (social, environmental, etc.) rules,” and a “public, state and parastate” sector providing equal and accessible services to the entire population. these positions differed substantially from the explicit anti-capitalism of the ufp’s program. the most contentious issue among oc members was the national question, and it was not resolved until the last oc national meeting in october 2005, when the 300 delegates voted overwhelmingly in favour of quebec sovereignty, thus fulfilling a key condition for ufp consent to a merger. the coordinating committee’s position paper justified its position largely on the basis that there was no credible or workable perspective for a renewed federalism that would allow quebec the additional powers it needed in order to resolve its social problems, but insisted that the defining characteristic of the new party should be its “social agenda” (projet social) and not its position on the national question. the delegates then voted unanimously to join with the ufp to form a new pro-sovereignty party. just three days earlier, on october 19, a right-wing manifesto had been published by former pq premier lucien bouchard, some other prominent péquistes, and equally prominent liberals. entitled pour un québec lucide (for a clear-eyed vision of quebec), it castigated “big unions” and called for lifting the freeze on university tuition fees, raising electricity rates and consumption taxes, focusing on debt reduction, opening the doors further to private sector investment in public infrastructures and ending the “unhealthy suspicion of private business that has developed in some sectors.” the important challenges facing quebecers, it proclaimed, were declining demographics and increasing global competition from asia — not sovereignty. the manifesto reflected 18  option citoyenne, 2004. | 157 a strong rightward drift of both the neoliberal pq and its federal counterpart the bloc québécois.19 thus, while the traditional pro-sovereignty parties were shifting further to the right and some prominent péquistes like bouchard were retreating from their previous commitment to a sovereigntist perspective, there was a perceptible trend developing in the opposite direction on the left, which now tended overwhelmingly to see a sovereign quebec as the framework for its social agenda. during 2005 option citoyenne and the ufp participated in some common actions and published joint briefs on sustainable development and electoral reform. and in response to the lucides’ manifesto, they initiated a counter-manifesto, pour un québec solidaire, that garnered more than 2,500 signatures.a special convention of the ufp in november 2005 voted unanimously in favour of a fusion with option citoyenne, and in february 2006 the two organizations held a joint congress to establish the new party, québec solidaire. the founding declaration of principles defined it as a party “resolutely of the left, feminist, ecologist, altermondialiste, pacifist, democratic and sovereigntist.” it was an impressive achievement — uniting leading activists in the women’s movement, some prominent trade-union militants, grassroots community organizers and long-standing leftists around a project to build a new québécois political movement based on popular and national sovereignty grounded in general principles of solidarity with the oppressed and exploited. a work in progress québec solidaire celebrated its fifth anniversary in february 2011. how has it fared? the balance sheet is uneven. during its first year, québec solidaire’s membership rose from 3,000 to just over 5,000, about 50% of them women, but since then has remained fairly stable. the party has just over 70 local associations organized on the basis of their respective electoral ridings as well as some university campus sections. about one third of these associations are considered “very active,” another one third less so, while the remainder function only minimally.20 in the last 19  at its convention in october 2005, the bloc voted to support nato membership, an eu free-trade (and investment) agreement, and the development of a quebec army and air force that would participate actively in international “peacekeeping”, as in canada’s occupation of haiti. at about the same time, pierre dubuc, the left-wing spq-libre candidate, received barely 1% support in his campaign for the pq leadership. 20  information provided at the party’s fifth convention, november 2009. québec solidaire: a québécois approach to building a broad left party 158 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times election, in 2008, the party nominated candidates in almost all of quebec’s 125 electoral counties, or ridings. québec solidaire strives for male-female parity in its structures and representation at all levels, and is headed by two “co-spokespersons”: françoise david, the party president, and amir khadir, currently its sole member of the quebec legislature, the national assembly. the party has an office with a small full-time staff, a web site and members’ intranet, and makes ample use of modern communications media such as twitter, facebook, blogs and videos. however, it has no newspaper, although this deficiency is partially compensated by various independent alternative media published by members and sympathizers of the party.21 the party lacks an internal discussion bulletin or email list, so there is little horizontal communication at the general membership level apart from organized pre-convention discussions, which are held in general assemblies in areas of greater membership density such as montréal and quebec city. a national (i.e. quebec-wide) policy commission is composed of a dozen or so theme committees, responsible for drafting papers and proposals for program development. a national women’s commission is composed of delegates from the various regions of quebec, and is charged with ensuring adherence by the party to the values of feminism. in the december 2008 general election, québec solidaire scored a major breakthrough. despite an undemocratic first-past-the-post electoral system, it managed to elect a member to the national assembly. the election of amir khadir in mercier riding brought welcome media attention to the party. his effective interventions in the national assembly have given the party considerable media exposure, and he has been able to speak out on many issues not previously associated with the left.22 however, his high media profile and popularity — opinion polls recently rated him the “most popular” mna in quebec! — have not translated into corresponding support for the party as a whole. although some recent polls have attributed 8-10% or more support to qs among the electorate, the overall score of its candidates in the two general elections since its founding (2007 and 2008) has been just under 4%. a handful of individual candidates, including david, have won electoral scores of between 10% and 30%, however; in each such case they are well-known activists in trade unions or other social movements. 21  presse-toi a gauche, http://www.pressegauche.org/ (on-line webzine), à bâbord! http:// www.ababord.org/ (bimonthly magazine), and nouveaux cahiers du socialisme, http:// www.cahiersdusocialisme.org/ (semi-annual journal, which also hosts a webzine). 22  to see khadir’s interventions in the assembly (there are hundreds of them since his election), see: http://www.assnat.qc.ca/fr/deputes/khadir-amir-25/interventions.html. | 159 although it styles itself “a party of the ballot-box and the streets” — a party of mass action as well as elections — this has not been an easy balance to establish or maintain. the political context, at least until khadir’s election, has been a difficult one in which to find opportunities to establish a visible presence in quebec’s political landscape. as in other parts of north america, quebec experienced a general downturn in extra-parliamentary mobilizations after 9-11, with the notable exception of the massive antiwar actions prior to the iraq war. added to this was the political demoralization of many militants following almost a decade of neoliberal austerity under a parti québécois government that for many discredited the very idea of quebec “sovereignty” as envisaged by the pq. the trade union movement has suffered major defeats in the face of an antilabour offensive orchestrated since 2003 by the liberal government. the student movement has been relatively quiescent since a successful mobilization against tuition fee increases in 2005. although antiwar sentiment remains high, mass actions are fewer and smaller. thus, québec solidaire has had to build itself in a period of general retreat for the very movements that generated its existence. in addition, québec solidaire has found its attention, energy and finances absorbed by election organizing, often to the detriment of extra-parliamentary mobilization. in its first three years the party faced two general elections and more than a half-dozen by-elections. besides meeting the demanding legal requirements of a registered party, it had to find and train candidates, raise funds, and hold successive delegated conventions to cobble together interim election platforms. the 2007 election platform,23 was limited to modest reforms that (as the party admitted) could be implemented within the “neoliberal and provincial framework.” it featured proposals for modest social reforms, free education, a publicly-owned pharmacare (prescription drugs insurance) agency, repeal of antilabour legislation, electoral reform through institution of proportional representation, tax reform, nationalization of wind power and expansion of public transit. however, this platform did not even reflect the minimal basis of agreement between the party’s founding components. for example, it called for a constituent assembly to determine quebec’s political and constitutional future, but did not call for sovereignty or independence. 23  http://www.quebecsolidaire.net/files/25engagementsqs.pdf. summarized in fidler, 2006. québec solidaire: a québécois approach to building a broad left party 160 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times the 2008 platform24 was much more elaborate. it called for “making quebec a country by way of popular sovereignty,” and included detailed proposals on language rights, intercultural secularism and international solidarity (for example, replacing free trade agreements with “new international treaties based on individual and collective rights, respect for the environment and a widening of democracy (such as the alba25).” but it also contained some notable omissions; for example, it opposed “canadian imperialist intervention” in the war in afghanistan but did not mention nato or canada’s other military alliances. in the 2008 election, more than half of québec solidaire’s 122 candidates were women — a first for a party in quebec and possibly in canada. the party was endorsed by the montréal council of the csn, and some candidates were endorsed by other unions. adopting a program in 2009 the party launched a lengthy process aimed at producing a formal program setting out québec solidaire’s proposals for a “democratic transformation of the whole of society over the medium and long term.” the program is distinguished from an election platform, which applies to a single government mandate, or an emergency program, a plan of action addressed to a specific context or issue.26 over a three-year period, culminating before the next quebec election, a series of delegated conventions are being held, each to debate and adopt sections of the program organized according to subject matter. the first convention, in november 2009, adopted resolutions on the national question, electoral reform, immigration policy and secularism. a second convention, held in march 2011, was addressed to the economy, the environment, and labour. other topics — health and social services, education, social and formal justice, culture, agriculture, and international solidarity and altermondialisation — will be addressed in subsequent conventions. under the complex procedure the party has chosen for conducting its program debates, initial written submissions by the members (or by “citizens’ circles” composed of both members and non-members) must 24  http://www.quebecsolidaire.net/files/qs-commitments-2008.pdf (in english). discussed in fidler, 2008. 25  alianza bolivariana para los pueblos de nuestra américa (bolivarian alliance for the peoples of our america), a progressive economic and social alliance for fair trade and mutual assistance initiated by venezuela and cuba, which now comprises eight countries of latin america and the caribbean. 26  see québec solidaire, 2009b. | 161 not exceed 800 words in length. the policy commission then compiles a “perspectives booklet” presenting concise demands based on what it considers the “principal orientations” in these submissions. these are discussed and amended or added to by qs local associations and general assemblies, following which the policy commission produces a “synthesis booklet” that arranges the revised demands by topic and, where appropriate, lists differing resolutions addressed to a particular issue as “options” (a half-dozen or so, in some cases) for debate and decision at the convention — first in topic workshops, then in plenary session, where delegates are limited to two or three minute interventions from the floor.27 at each stage the draft documents are published on the members’ intranet. (in the lead-up to the first convention, written contributions to the debate by individual members or groups of members were published on the qs web site; however, it appears this practice is no longer being implemented.) whatever the democratic merits of this procedure– and there are some, to be sure–it effectively precludes lengthier written contributions within the party structures that could outline a general strategic or programmatic framework on the given subjects and allow a broader debate among opposing approaches. as noted earlier, the party has no public or internal discussion bulletin or even an email discussion list that would allow such debates. the main topics for debate at the first program convention, in november 2009, were the national question and reform or creation of “democratic institutions.” the three hundred delegates agreed, by large majorities:28 that the quebec “nation” includes all residents of quebec, and is based not on ethnic origin but on voluntary membership in the political community, with french as the common language of public communication; this nation being composed historically by the successive integration of people originating from other communities, including the anglophone community. qs also acknowledges the sovereignty of “the ten amerindian peoples and the inuit people who also inhabit quebec territory,” and their fundamental right to national self-determination, however they choose to exercise that right. 27  in the most recent discussion, prior to the sixth convention held in march 2011, the policy commission received about 150 submissions. following publication of the perspectives booklet, members submitted about 600 amendments and new proposals or comments from about 40 local associations or committees entitled to representation at the convention. (introduction to the cahier synthèse–programme) this suggests that most of the internal preconvention discussion was on the basis of the perspectives document, with its succinct specific demands. 28  for a full report, see fidler, 2009. québec solidaire: a québécois approach to building a broad left party 162 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times that “canadian federalism is basically unreformable. it is impossible for quebec to obtain all the powers it wants and needs for the profound changes proposed by québec solidaire.” a new relationship with the rest of canada can only be negotiated once the québécois have clearly established their intent and ability to form an independent state. that independence should be achieved through a process of participatory and representative democracy, through election of a constituent assembly composed equally of women and men, with “proportional representation of tendencies and the various socio-economic milieus within quebec society.” the assembly would conduct an extensive consultation of opinion and, following its debates, its conclusions — in effect, a draft constitution — would then be put to a popular vote in a referendum. these positions mark a major advance in the party’s understanding of the national question, when compared with the minimal agreement on this question at its founding. and they clearly delimit it from the pq’s sovereignty-association and ethnic nationalism, as well as its referendum strategy which limits popular input to a vote on a question negotiated between the parties in the national assembly. the convention also addressed another of québec solidaire’s founding “values” — laïcité, or secularism — basically, separation of church and state. this is a hot-button issue in quebec, where right-wing ideologues, narrow nationalists, and some leftists and feminists have campaigned in recent years against “reasonable accommodation” of ethnic minority practices. those particularly targeted include muslim women wearing “ostentatious symbols” of their religious faith such as the hijab, or scarf, which are deemed threats to national identity or challenges to women’s rights. the qs delegates ratified the party leadership’s concept of “open” and “intercultural” secularism and opposed proposals for state-enforced dress codes that would effectively outlaw the wearing of symbols of religious belief. debate continues in the party on some related issues such as the growing demand by many nationalists and feminists that the government adopt a “charte de laïcité,” a charter to control more generally the expression of religious beliefs in the public sphere. the convention also adopted progressive proposals on measures to integrate immigrants into quebec society and on democratic reform of electoral institutions. in regard to the latter topic, qs advocates a system of proportional representation that would elect 60% of mnas as individual riding representatives, the other 40% of the seats being allocated to the various parties in proportion to their respective shares of the popular vote. | 163 the second program convention, held in march 2011, focused on environmental, economic and labour issues.29 environment. the 350 delegates voted for a major turn to “green energy,” including: a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by at least 40% by 2020 compared with 1990 levels, and by 95% by 2050. abandonment of fossil fuels by 2030. opposition to carbon taxes, carbon trading and storage schemes, biofuels, and geo-engineering. “public control” over energy firms, defined as majority participation of the state up to and including 100% nationalization as needed. prohibition of any new hydro-electric development. production of renewable energies: solar, geothermal, wind, to limit to the maximum any supplementary resort to hydro-electricity. an end to all exploration and development of fossil fuels, such as petroleum in the gulf of st. lawrence (old harry), shale gas, and lng ports. elimination of quebec’s nuclear reactor system, and an end to the exploration and development of uranium mines. development of electrified transportation to ensure the accessibility, universality “or even gratuity” of public transit. support for a new, legally binding international agreement, and participation in the world movement linking climate and social justice. it was noted that this movement is inspired by the alternative peoples’ summit on the environment held at cochabamba, bolivia in april 2010. natural resources. the convention voted by large majorities that the mining and forestry industries should be placed under “public control,” with up to 100% nationalization “as needed.” in addition: all resource industries to be subject to strict environmental regulations, and no project to be approved without meaningful public consultation in the communities concerned and a veto by local or regional authorities over development plans. mining royalties to be increased and shared equitably between the resource region and the government. in the forest industry, elimination of laws allowing clear cutting and cutting in the boreal forest north of the 49th parallel. a reduction in disparities between natural and managed forests, and a need for prior agreements with the indigenous people in all regions under aboriginal treaties or land claims. fresh water, whether surface or underground, to be considered a 29  see fidler, 2011a. québec solidaire: a québécois approach to building a broad left party 164 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times “non-commodified common good accessible to all but the property of no one,” with the state as guardian. water used by industry and businesses to be considered a “loaned” public property subject to royalties and post-treatment controls. trade union and labour rights. among the programmatic demands adopted by the convention — usually by large majorities, in some cases unanimously — are the following: constitutional protection of the right to join unions, bargain and strike, including the right to political and solidarity strikes (strikes for political objectives and in solidarity with striking workers and students). prohibition of lockouts, and strict controls on layoffs and shutdowns — including mandatory justification before a government agency, protection of company pensions, compulsory retraining and re-employment in similar jobs, etc. state assistance to employees wishing to form local worker coops when companies relocate. union rights for farmworkers and self-employed workers, and the right to multi-employer certifications. right of full employment in safe, stable, socially useful, ecologically sound work free of discrimination, with social protection in case of loss of employment, incapacity and ageing. affirmative action for women, disabled, visible minorities and indigenous. immediate reduction in the workweek to 35 hours, and “gradual” transition to 32 hours with no loss of pay, compensatory hiring and no speed-up in workload or pace. legal restrictions on the use of overtime work. an immediate increase in the minimum wage to the low-income (poverty) threshold for a person working full time, with a “gradual” increase to 50% over this threshold, indexed to the cost of living. this would mean a gradual increase from $10.66 to $15.99 per hour. expanded public employment in social services, construction, infrastructures maintenance and environmental clean-up. accessible programs for job retraining, free and funded by employers and government. virtually all of these demands have been raised by the unions and social movements; québec solidaire sees itself as their political and electoral representative. beyond capitalism? introducing the preconvention debates, the policy commission asked qs members to consider a question that goes to the very heart of | 165 the party’s conception of its overall objective: “as we work on our program, we should spell out the nature and limits of the system, and ask ourselves the following question: isn’t the capitalist system, based as it is on maximizing profit and irresponsible exploitation of nature, the main obstacle to social progress and a healthy relationship to the environment? we need a serious debate on the question so we can determine whether our social problems can be corrected by reforms that respect the logic of the system or if we need to adopt the perspective of going beyond the system.”30 this was also the question put by the québec solidaire leadership in a manifesto issued for may day 2009, entitled “to emerge from the crisis, should we go beyond capitalism?”31 the manifesto’s anticapitalist rhetoric met with a very favourable response in qs ranks.this defining issue was debated briefly during the preconvention period, although not in official party publications. some members argued that qs should remain a “rainbow coalition,” fighting “for immediate changes realizable within the framework of the present capitalist state and system.” others, however, argued for a more radical perspective: “ecosocialism,” and an explicit attention to “the class interests of the workers’ movement.”32 judging from the debates at the march convention, these questions remain open for “serious debate” in québec solidaire. in the plenary session on “general orientations,” delegates voted by a large majority for a statement declaring that “qs ultimately intends to go beyond capitalism,” and calling for a “plural economy” and “an eventual socialization of economic activities, based on a strengthened public economy (state-owned companies and nationalization of major enterprises in some strategic sectors), a greater role of the social economy (cooperatives, community-owned firms), and a controlled private sector, with much greater emphasis on promoting small and medium enterprises (smes).” no relative weight was assigned to any of these sectors. a number of delegates objected that many smes are low-wage sweatshops, the proprietors being bitter opponents of trade unions. their alternative motions were outvoted after brief debate. delegates voted as well that: nationalized enterprises are to be operated in a framework of national and democratic planning, with decentralized management including 30  québec solidaire, 2010, p.5 31  québec solidaire, 2009a. 32  for excerpts, see fidler, 2011a. québec solidaire: a québécois approach to building a broad left party 166 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times representatives of employees, the community, and first nations where applicable. forms of self-management are to be promoted in place of bureaucratic oversight. economic growth must cease to be considered an objective in itself. a qs government will take immediate legal, regulatory, fiscal or other measures to discourage over-production, over-indebtedness, and overconsumption. the emphasis on the “social economy” is not surprising, perhaps, given the traditional prominence within quebec society of farming co-operatives, the caisses populaires (originally, parish-based credit unions), and similar service-based not-for-profit organizations, with selfdefined “social missions” and relatively democratic decision-making structures.33 the attention to the “domestic economy” reflects as well the traditions and roots of many qs members in the feminist movement and its recognition that many important economic functions of society go unpaid or underpaid relative to other economic sectors. however, many of these undertakings operate in low-wage ghettos, and they often serve to legitimize the privatization of public services. and although some sectors, as in the childcare industry, have managed to unionize, some major proponents of quebec’s “social economy” are heavily implicated in collaborating with the trade union-sponsored investment funds such as the ftq’s solidarity fund or the csn’s fondaction, which have served as a major economic and ideological bulwark for the conservative union bureaucracy.34 the “social economy,” as it actually functions in quebec society, is an integral part of its capitalist economy. and some of its components, such as the massive desjardins movement, a dominant player in retail banking and insurance in the province, are major institutions of “québec inc.,” the new francophone corporate elite. a packed agenda did not allow time for debate on important resolutions on banking and the financial industry — where some draft proposals called for complete expropriation — and taxation, where pro33  in quebec as a whole, the “social economy” comprises more than 7,000 “collective enterprises (cooperatives and non-profits)” employing 125,000 workers and accounting for 8% of the province’s gdp. see: http://www.chantier.qc.ca/?module=document&uid=871. a recent study of the “social economy” in montréal alone lists close to 4,000 establishments with $2 billion in revenues and employing more than 65,000 salaried workers (women occupying about 59% of full-time and 66% of part-time jobs). they encompass a wide variety of undertakings: housing cooperatives, child-care centres, caterers, domestic care agencies, as well as some major operations in the retail, finance and insurance sectors. see université du québec à montréal, 2008. 34  see, for example, neamtam,2010. | 167 posals included, inter alia, rejection of consumption taxes and radically shifting the tax burden from individuals to corporations. these topics were left for future debate and decision. a party of the ballot boxes... and the streets? aware that “politics” is conventionally viewed as electoral and parliamentary activity, québec solidaire has established itself as an officially recognized party under quebec law. since its founding, and particularly since khadir’s election in 2008, the focus has been increasingly on a strategy of building the party through the ballot box, to the neglect of extra-parliamentary action “in the streets.” a “development plan” adopted at a national council meeting, in june 2010, summarized the objectives for the next two years as “advancing our ideas in the population, gaining a greater presence in public debates, electing more mnas and appreciably increasing our percentage of the vote in the next general elections.” a draft resolution of the qs policy commission, still to be debated and adopted in a future convention, addresses “the relations between québec solidaire, the trade-union movement and the social movements in general.” the draft text outlines a strategy by which qs, “as a party and as a government, should seek to strengthen the capacities of the social movements, encourage their unity in action and participate in them on the basis of a program of social transformation.” it proposes that qs members who belong to the various social movements be encouraged to “network” within the party — that is, coordinate their activities within the unions and other movements around a strategy of reciprocal reinforcement of the movements and the party while respecting “the organizational and political autonomy of the social movements.” this draft text addresses an important lacuna in québec solidaire’s activities. québec solidaire works alongside the unions and some social movements in a number of coalitions, such as the pro-independence conseil de la souveraineté. but its modest campaign in relation to the public-sector unions’ negotiations with the quebec government last year, labelled “courage politique,” failed to mount a clear defense of the unions’ demands and was largely confined to arguments in support of existing social programs and opposition to privatization. the party has no organized presence as such in the unions. as the policy commission puts it, the conquest of political power requires “a structured political organization whose program integrates québec solidaire: a québécois approach to building a broad left party 168 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times the demands of the social movements and an overall projet de société [program for society].” and thus it is important to think in particular about the party’s relation with “the trade-union movement, which occupies a central place within quebec’s social movements.” the undemocratic first-past-the-post system in quebec (as in every other jurisdiction in canada) poses some formidable obstacles to a new party with radical ideas facing a hostile mass media in a multiparty environment. québec solidaire promotes a detailed proposal for a system of proportional representation, but recognizes that there is no early prospect of its adoption. with this in mind, the party leadership asked delegates to the march convention to consider whether qs should seek electoral agreements with other parties under which each party would agree not to contest certain ridings in which the other stood a better chance of electing its candidate. two options were on the table: (a) a possible tactical agreement with the parti québécois and/or the verts (a small green party); or (b) a possible tactical agreement with the verts alone, a “strategic alliance” with that party being deemed conceivable if based on the global greens charter, but ruled out for “practical reasons pertaining to internal decisions of the verts in quebec.” after an intense debate, the delegates rejected any such alliances, despite appeals from both amir khadir and françoise david, among others, in support of either option. opponents noted that such alliances would blur québec solidaire’s programmatic differences from the other parties, particularly the pq, and in any case were impractical — the pq is apprehensive of the growing popularity of qs among many of its traditional supporters, and pq governments have always resisted implementing any form of proportional representation. the vote also reaffirmed the members’ determination to build québec solidaire as an independent left-wing political alternative to the parti québécois. a ‘country of projects’ the unexpected surge in support for the new democratic party in the may 2 federal election, and the sharp decline in the bloc québécois vote,35 have underscored the volatility of the quebec electorate and stimulated hopes in québec solidaire, which does not run for federal office, for major gains in the next provincial election. it has also given 35  the ndp took 43% of the popular vote in quebec, electing 59 of the province’s 75 mps. in 2008 it had polled only 12.2%, electing one mp. the bloc vote fell from close to 40% in 2008 to less than 24%, and it elected only 4 mps, although it had elected a majority of quebec’s mps since 1993. see fidler, 2011b. the bloc’s collapse has touched off a profound crisis within the parti québécois and traditional pro-sovereignty movement: see fidler, 2011e | 169 a powerful boost to the party’s campaign “for a country of projects,” launched in mid-april of 2011 pursuant to a resolution adopted at its november 2009 convention.36 the campaign web site sets out the party’s vision of sovereignty and the approach it favours for achieving it. it also outlines the party’s approach to strengthening the status of the french language, especially in montréal. as the web site explains: “some of these projects can be achieved here and now, without affecting quebec’s constitutional status. however, the people’s ambition to realize many other projects will soon be hobbled by the total or partial absence of any latitude for quebec in areas as fundamental as the environment, foreign policy, foreign trade and even language. the full mastery of our destiny is therefore indispensable for achieving all of the projects of our dreams.” associated materials (all on-line) include a historical survey that dates a québécois quest for sovereignty back to the 18th century, a critique of canadian federalism and the failure of past efforts to reform the system, and a critique of “the impasse of the pq and its referendum strategy,” to which it counterposes québec solidaire’s proposed grassroots campaign to build support for sovereignty and, eventually, the election of a democratic non-partisan constituent assembly to adopt a constitution for an independent quebec. associated articles describe parallel “inspiring experiences” in bolivia, ecuador and, most recently, in tunisia. in the fall of 2011, the campaign will feature a tour of quebec by qs president françoise david and public meetings “on themes chosen by local party associations.” this campaign has the potential to boost québec solidaire’s profile as the left wing of the independence movement, with a “project for society” and a “country of projects” that points toward an anticapitalist alternative vision that breaks sharply with the pq-bloc strategy for independence — a strategy “based on alienation from canada,” and “fuelled by resentment,” as amir khadir described it in a recent analysis of the federal election results.37 21st century socialism? the rightward evolution of the traditional sovereigntist parties, the pq and bq, has left a very broad space to their left, one that québec soli36  see fidler, 2009. the interactive campaign web site may be accessed at: quèbec solidaire 2011. 37  le devoir, may 14, 2011. translated in fidler, 2011c québec solidaire: a québécois approach to building a broad left party 170 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times daire aspires to fill. the party has managed to cast a wide net, encompassing leading activists from the women’s movement and community social action groups, veterans of previous but unsuccessful attempts to found viable parties of socialism and a marxist left, and some trade unionists. it cannot (yet) be classified as anti-capitalist, or a party of 21st century socialism as that concept has generally been conceived. but it is clearly much more than a québécois version of the federalist ndp, notwithstanding hopes expressed by qs leaders that the ndp will some day prove a valuable canadian interlocutor for quebec as it moves to independence. québec solidaire’s support of quebec independence means that its strategic framework is not limited to the existing form of the state; it opens the party’s imagination and perspectives to conceiving another, very different quebec based on the “values” or principles upheld by the party. this is not a line of march that facilitates accommodation with the canadian bourgeoisie or its quebec component. this independentism is one of québec solidaire’s strongest programmatic assets, offering it the potential to build a party that encompasses and represents the driving forces for progressive social transformation within the quebec social formation. there are other important features of the party, however, that underscore its sui generis nature in the quebec, and indeed canadian, political landscape and that offer hope for its evolution and development into a mass socialist party with deep roots among quebec working people. the party’s strong commitment to feminist principles has given it a compass in navigating through the shoals of the public debate over quebec identity and “reasonable accommodation.” despite some backsliding by the party leadership,38 qs has generally stood firm behind its support of “open secularism” in the face of harsh criticism from some on the left. the near parity of women with men in the party’s membership and structures is unique in quebec, and in canada. québec solidaire’s internationalism has been given limited expres38  qs has given critical support to the charest government’s bill 94, which would deny government-funded health care, education and child care services to all whose clothing prevents disclosure of their face, and would bar them from government and public-service employment. the bill patently targets a tiny number of muslim women who wear niqabs or burqas. and when some sikhs sought to appear before a parliamentary committee to express their opposition to bill 94, amir khadir added his vote on a pq motion, supported by the other parties, to exclude them from the national assembly because they were wearing their ceremonial dagger, the kirpan. this action is arguably inconsistent with the resolutions on laïcité adopted a year ago, mentioned in this paper. | 171 sion in its opposition to capitalist trade and investment deals, its opposition to the war in afghanistan, and in its sympathy toward progressive governments in latin america. the party has been harshly attacked in the mainstream media for its participation in the boycott, divestment and sanctions campaign against israeli apartheid, which the delegates to its november 2009 convention voted unanimously to endorse — a position that demarks québec solidaire from the ndp’s strong support of the zionist state.39 the party’s commitment to defence of the environment, if adhered to consistently, points it toward anti-capitalist solutions and the formulation of a radical ecosocialism that can link up with the worldwide movement developing in the wake of bolivia’s cochabamba conference of 2010. last but not least, the pluralism of québec solidaire, its desire to include within its ranks all those in quebec who wish to fight for another, better world, opens space for revolutionary socialists and marxists to join the party and to fight for their perspectives within the party as organized “collectives” democratically recognized by the party’s statutes although not represented as such in its leadership bodies. although they have maintained a rather low profile so far, some of these collectives could play a leading role in helping to bring theoretical understanding and clarity to the evolving debates on the party’s program and its activities. perhaps more importantly, they could help to overcome a glaring deficiency in the party: its lack of any coherent organized educational effort among its members and the larger left constituency. this paper has described in considerable detail the process of formation of québec solidaire because it has features that can serve as guides for other processes in other settings. the left groups that initiated the process recognized a shift in the objective situation — in this case the growing disillusionment with the pq, the new vibrancy of the women’s movement, and the appearance of a new altermondialiste movement mobilizing young people in opposition to capitalist oppression and injustice. they laid down a minimal set of principles for regroupment and consolidation: a strategic framework of striving for the independence of quebec; feminism, both programmatically and organizationally (as in male-female parity in party structures); pluralism, inclusion of all who agreed to support and work to implement the party’s “values” and general orientations, and respect for minority opinions including the right 39  québec solidaire was a strong supporter of the recent “boat to gaza” solidarity project, delegating a qs leader, manon massé, to participate personally on the party’s behalf in the international attempt to breach the israeli blockade of the palestinian statelet. québec solidaire: a québécois approach to building a broad left party 172 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times of members with particular perspectives to organize within the party in support of their views; internationalism — placing anti-imperialism, solidarity and global justice at the core of the new party’s politics. and throughout, they were willing to let the process follow its own rhythm. as pierre dostie said, in describing the ufp’s approach to fusion with option citoyenne, the latter “had to comply with its own process, [so] we sought areas of convergence and we entered into a dialogue.” (note 15, supra) the goal is to build a party that encompasses and represents the leading militants in all those movements that are, in various ways, engaged in struggles against capital. the future of québec solidaire is closely linked to its ability to become more integrated in quebec’s broad labour-radical subculture, and to develop the “reciprocal relationship” with the trade union and popular movements that is outlined in the policy commission proposal. to the degree that it does this, the social and ethnic composition of the party will change. qs is still a “white” party, for example. neither its membership nor its leading bodies reflect the diverse ethnic and immigrant composition of quebec. it is no accident that its major achievements so far, the election of amir khadir, an iranian-quebecois with deep roots in the independence movement, was scored in one of montréal’s most ethnically diverse constituencies. québec solidaire cannot yet be characterized as an anticapitalist party. but it is fair to say that it is much more than a québécois version of, say, the federal ndp. some important features of the party underscore its sui generis nature and offer hope for its evolution and development into a mass socialist party with deep roots among quebec working people. references à bâbord ! (february-march 2005). négociations ufp-option citoyenne: go! go! gauche!. chantier de l’économie sociale (march 28, 2011). définition. retrieved from http://www.chantier.qc.ca/?module=document&uid=871. cooke, m. (2004). constitutional confusion on the left: the ndp’s position in canada’s constitutional debates. retrieved from http://www.cpsa acsp.ca/papers-2004/cooke.pdf dostie, p. et al . (2006) .quelques repères dans l’histoire de la gauche politique québécoise. (website of the union des forces progressistes, no longer available). dubuc, p. (2003). l’autre histoire de l’indépendance (éditions trois-pistoles, | 173 éditions du renouveau québécois). dufour, p. (2009). from protest to partisan politics: when and how collective actors cross the line. sociological perspectives on québec solidaire, canadian journal of sociology/cahiers canadiens de sociologie 34(1), page range. fidler, r. (december 10, 2003). quebec’s new united left party. retrieved from http://www.greenleft.org.au/node/28531 –-. (december 10, 2006). québec solidaire adopts a program for government. retrieved from http://www.socialistvoice.ca/?p=142 –-. (december 15, 2008). québec solidaire scores major breakthrough in quebec election. retrieved from http://lifeonleft.blogspot.com/2008/12/qubecsolidairescores-major.html –-. (december 4, 2009). quebec left debates strategy for independence. retrieved from http://lifeonleft.blogspot.com/2009/12/quebec-left-debatesstrategy-for.html –. (2011a). beyond capitalism? québec solidaire launches debate on its program for social transformation. retrieved from http://www .socialistproject .ca/ bullet/491 .php –-. (2011b). the federal ndp’s electoral breakthrough in quebec: a challenge to progressives in canada. retrieved from http://lifeonleft.blogspot. com/2011/05/federal-ndps-electoral-breakthrough-in.html –-. (2011c).more on that election. retrieved from http://lifeonleft.blogspot. com/2011/05/more-on-that-election.html –. (2011d). layton chooses supreme court, clarity act over ndp’s sherbrooke declaration. retrieved from http://lifeonleft.blogspot.com/2011/05/layton chooses-supreme-court-clarity.html –-. (2011e). behind those resignations from the parti québécois. retrieved from http://lifeonleft.blogspot.com/2011/06/behind-those-resignations-fromparti.html gagnon, h. (n.d.). les militants socialistes du québec. retrieved from http:// www.pcq.qc.ca/dossiers/pcq/histoire/lesmilitantssocialistes.pdf lavallée, j, (2011). du parti de la démocratie socialiste à québec solidaire,” in la gauche au québec depuis 1945, (bulletin d’histoire politique, 19, 2, winter 2011), p. 202-14. moreau, f . (1986) . balance sheet of the quebec far left. retrieved from http://socialisthistory.ca/docs/history/bilan-moreau-english.htm neamtam, n.. (2010). interview: integration with trade unions is key to the success of social/solidarity economy initiatives. retrieved from http:// www.chantier.qc.ca/?module=document&action=get&uid=1059 option citoyenne. (2004). document préparatoire à la rencontre nationale. retrieved from http://www.lagauche.com/lagauche/spip.php?article1078 parti socialiste du québec. (1966). programme 66. longueil: les presses québec solidaire: a québécois approach to building a broad left party 174 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times sociales. québec solidaire (2009b). définition du programme politique. retrieved from http://programme.quebecsolidaire.net/definition –-. (2009a). pour sortir de la crise: dépasser le capitalisme? manifeste de québec solidaire . retrieved from http://www.quebecsolidaire.net/ files/2009-05manifeste-crise.pdf –-. (2011). pour un pays de projets. retrieved from www.paysdeprojets.org –-. (2010). pour une société solidaire et écologique....cahier de participation au programme, enjeu 2.retrieved from http://programme. quebecsolidaire.net/documents/cahier_de_participation corrige.pdf#page=5 regina manifesto. (1933). title (italics) retrieved from http://www. saskndp.ca/assets/file/history/manifest.pdf université du québec à montréal. (2008). chaire de recherche en économie sociale . portrait statistique de l’économie sociale de la région administrative de montréal. retrieved from http://www.credemontreal.qc.ca/ publications/developpement%20economique/p ortrait%20 statistique%20economie%20sociale.pdf symposium on braverman comments by leo panitch i want to begin with a couple of comments on what braverman has accomplished. i think this is important because although burawoy began his paper and his talk with praise of braverman, by the time he's through with him, he's dragged him through what marx would call the "muck" . now, all of this puts me in an odd position because i have criticisms of braverman's work. i was struck, in coming into this room, by a resemblance to a court-chamber--the way we're sitting here, the way you're sitting there. and as i read burawoy's critique of braverman, i had the feeling that what was being engaged in here was a prosecution and that willy-nilly i was being cast into the role of the defence attorney. therefore, you may have to excuse me if what i say sounds like that to some extent, if i have to occasionally bring evidence into court, that is, the odd quotation, in order to salvage braverman from the critique which we just heard.. in order to counter the critique, i think one has to note braverman's achievements, the ones that haven't been noted. first of all, braverman has brought us back to a proper appreciation of what marx meant by the tendency to emiseration. those embourgeoisement theorists who thought that marx meant by this the increasing material impoverishment of workers simply did not know what they were talking about. on the contrary, marx saw capitalism as constantly, through its restless striving after the general forms of wealth, driving labour out beyond the limits of its natural needs and producing the material elements needed for the development of the rich individualityreplacing natural needs with needs that were historically produced. in other words, capital was itself constantly redefining subsistence at higher levels. what emiseration meant for marx in this context was 15 alternate routes something different. it was what braverman describes as the degradation of work, and marx put it extremely well in turns of capitalists establishing "the accumulation of misery corresponding to the accumulation of capital". and what he means by that is the accumulation of wealth at one pole is therefore at the same time the accumulation of misery expressed in marx's terms as "the agony of toil, slavery, ignorance, brutality, mental degradation at the opposite pole, i.e. on the side of the class that produces its own product in the form of capital". that's what marx meant by the tendency to emiseration, and what braverman has done is salvage this definition for our own time. well, braverman also has done more than this, and one of the ways in which people who look at braverman have done him injustice is that they see the book as a book on the labour process. it's much more than that, its central core, its intent, to begin with, was to identify the structure of the working class, and the manner in which it had changed. if you read the first page of braverman's introduction, that's what he set out to do. he makes it clear that in the process of trying to look at occupational shifts, that is, between occupations and within occupations, he became aware of a contradiction in the literature between an argument that went something to the effect that modern work required higher levels of education, training, mental effort, etc., and a simultaneous argument that work was subdivided into petty tasks, petty operations, that are mundane, alienating, and so on. braverman found no attempt to reconcile those two processes. so he began to look for a dynamic which would explain the evolution of labour processes within occupations as well as between them, and this led him to stress the evolution of management and technology, of the modern corporation as well as of social structure. he found himself doing a history of the capitalist mode of production over the last hundred 16 symposium on braverman years. but this does not mean that his central concern was lost in the process. it's no accident that the last third of the book is concerned with the mapping-out of the structure of the modern working class, in the context of his examination of the dynamics of proletarianization. he arrives at part iv, at this point, and what he gives us is something not dissimilar to the kinds of mapping we receive from kinds of recent marxist theoreticians like carchedi or even erik olin wright. but unlike their work, he provides us not merely with a mapping which is deductively arrived at, but one which is also empirically and inductively arrived at. as a result, his mapping is much more detailed and richer; it has meat on it if you will. we will remember that the critique begins at the level of a divorce between evaluation and criticism, a divorce between "science" and critique in braverman, with the statement that in marx, these two things are combined, and i think that's very true and it's an important insight—probably the person who has given the best expression of that insight in marx is norman geras . and what he was getting at was the argument that marxism as a critique is not a moral critique, not an ethical critique; it doesn't take its standpoint in that sense from a set of values--it is scientific, and insofar as it attempts to get at the essence of things rather than the appearance of things, it cuts away mythology, ideology in the false sense, and establishes criticism by counteracting mythology and ideology. his criticism is therefore based on uncovering the essence of reality and it doesn't depend on a moral or ethical stance. i don't think braverman does in fact base his criticism of capitalism on a moral stance, but bases it on his attempt to uncover the dynamics of proletarianization in capitalism. moreover, i don't think one avoids the problem that burawoy seems to think braverman has by stepping out of capitalism. the whole 17 alternate routes problematic of speaking of inside and outside of capitalism in terms of points of view for us today is very bothersome. it's very difficult to imagine that we, living in a capitalist society, can step outside of capitalism when we try to define feudalism. we define those elements of feudalism that appear to us important vis-a-vis capitalism; we never step outside of capitalism (that seems to me an essential point in the sociology of knowledge). moreover, what burawoy gives us is a very ideal-typical definition of feudalism, one which-really i think would apply to all pre-capitalist formations, and not to feudalism itself. braverman would reject an attempt to understand the contrasts between feudalism and capitalism in ideal-typical terms; he in fact says very clearly and explicitly in his introduction that the same productive forces that are characteristic of the close of one epoch of social relations are also characteristic of the opening of the succeeding epoch. it is not a matter of craft production not being there in feudalism and suddenly being there in capitalism--in that sense braverman is both developing his point of view, if you like, from feudalism and from capitalism. what he is talking about is not the craft worker per se; what he is talking about is the paradox that labour is a commodity (labour-power is a commodity) that can't be separated from its owner. that's what he's talking about; and what capitalism has to do in treating labour-power as a commodity is in some way attempt to attenuate, although it can never remove, that indissoluble connection between labour-power and the individual to whom it belongs. a second point that burawoy made is a critique of braverman for treating class as an objective rather than a subjective category. i think that if one reads braverman carefully, one sees that an attack on braverman for not seeing class as class formation is a •traw man. braverman makes very clear that he doesn't want to 18 symposium on braverman deprecate the importance of the study of the state of consciousness of the working class, since it is only through consciousness that a class becomes an actor on the historic stage class consciousness is that state of social cohesion reflected in the understanding and activities of a class or portion of a class. its absolute expression is a pervasive and durable attitude on the part of a class toward its position in society. its long-term relative expression is found in the slowly changing traditions, experiences, education, and organization of the class. its short-term relative expression is a dynamic complex of moods and sentiments affected by circumstances and changing with them, sometimes in periods of stress and conflict, almost from day to day. a class, cannot exist in society without in some degree manifesting a consciousness of itself as a group, with common problems, interests and prospects, although this manifestation may for long periods be weak, confused and subject to manipulation by other classes. (braverman, 1974: 29, 30). so i think that the conception that braverman has is very much of a class as an historical actor. but what he is saying, is that in order to understand and examine empirically that class, one has to begin with a certain mapping, in order to know what to look for. przeworski , in his important paper on class formations, ends up by agreeing with this, but giving us a very crude mapping—industrial workers , white collar workers, bourgeoisie, will do. but what braverman gives us is a rich mapping, which marks out the paths to follow much more clearly. so again i think that the criticism is misconceived. there is another criticism of braverman--he doesn't talk enough about class struggle. clearly, this is part of our problem, which wasn't braverman 's problem (he didn't live in a university). in isolation, we have a need to shout class struggle from the rooftops in terms of understanding society. braverman has an understanding of society's dynamic being composed of class struggle so deep that it suffuses his work and he doesn't constantly have to keep crying class struggle. i think that if you read braverman (this is not new--many 19 alternate routes people have made this criticism of braverman) this criticism can be avoided. rather than, as burawoy suggests, seeing workers' responses to taylorism being merely impotent resistance, or simply internal friction, braverman makes it clear that it doesn't have that view at all. braverman points out that taylorism raised a storm of opposition among trade unions during the early part of the century, and then he goes on to quote, after discussing that opposition, a long passage from the international moulders journal in which he shows that the moulders understood perfectly what was happening to them. when he later speaks of internal friction, (and he doesn't use the term "mere" friction) he first makes clear that the pace of production is decided in a practice which' largely assumes the form of a struggle, whether organized or not. braverman very clearly has this image of class struggle taking place, not only and maybe even not so much, given his american context, at the level of the central organizations of the unions, at the level of the national civic federation in the nineteenth century, but at the level of the shopfloor in day-to-day struggle. and it's interesting how he's able to use taylor to make his own case in this regard, because his quotations from taylor are full of the class struggle (soldiering, etc.). burawoy argues that braverman doesn't have a concept of contradiction; at best it's only there in passing. to some extent i think this is true, in the sense that the contradiction that braverman identifies apart from class struggle is the gap between potential which exists in modern capitalism, and the actuality that we experience. but the irony of burawoy 's points with regard to contradiction, is that of the eclecticism that he indicates by referring to certain neo-marxists who do use the concept of contradiction. he refers to habermas and offe and others who have decided that the working class is not an 20 symposium on braverman element in the contradiction any longer, who identify contradiction at the highly abstract levels of legitimacy crises in the sense that crises then always beset capitalism. even the best of the works based on this, like o'connor, give very little play to the actual class struggle. sure, you can identify contradictions, the question is to what extent can you operationalize them in terms of being able to understand whether a society will in fact evolve in a certain direction or not. and it's interesting that the theoretical framework that burawoy adopts in terms of understanding capitalism and in terms of his critique of braverman, is that of understanding how capitalism in a concrete way reproduces itself. i think that is very important and it's one of the great contributions of the structuralist (marxist) developments. but i wonder whether, by simply looking at the way capitalism reproduces itself, we don't fall into the same error that parsons or parsons and shils fell into. parsons and chils argued that by understanding the way in which the system maintained itself, one could also understand the conditions for change. all one can understand, if the system doesn't reproduce itself, is breakdown; one doesn't understand conditions of transformation, by simply studying maintenance. and there's no doubt that one of the great problems with the structuralists, even the structuralists like poulantzas, is that they don't establish the conditions for change in any sense. they are simply talking, in a very functionalist way, of outcomes rather than purpose at the centre of their analysis, of how the state comes in to plug the gaps, the contradictions that develop in the system. one final point on socialist machines, and then i'll shut up. i think that in a sense burawoy 's onto something here, in what is i think an important section of the paper, but i'm not sure one can lay apathy on braverman, the kind of neutral view of technology that is 21 alternate routes suggested in the latter part of the paper. i don't think one can hang on braverman the conception that technology is neutral, that machines are neutral. braverman makes it very clear in the beginning of his work that the treatment of the interplay between forces and relations of production occupied marx in almost all of his historical writings, and while there is no question that he gave primacy to the forces of production in the long sweep of history, the idea that this primacy on a day-to-day basis could be used in a formalistic way in the analysis of history would never have entered his mind. within the historical, analytical limits of capitalism, according to marxist analysis, technology instead of simply producing social relations, is produced by social relations represented by capital. the concrete and determinate forms of society are indeed "determined" rather than accidental , but this is the determinacy of the thread-by-thread weaving of the fabric of history, not the imposition of external formulas... every society is a moment in the historical process, and can be grasped only as part of that process. capitalism, a social form, when it exists in time, space, population, and history, weaves a web of myriad threads; the conditions of its existence form a complex network each of which presupposes many others. it is because of this solid and tangible existence, this concrete form produced by history, no part of which may be changed by artificial suppositions without doing violence to its true mode of existence it is precisely because of this that it appears to us as "natural," "inevitable", and "eternal". and it is only in this sense, as a fabric woven over centuries, that we may say that capitalism "produced" the present capitalist mode of production. this is a far cry from a ready-made formula which enables us to "deduce" from a given state of technology a given mode of social organization. (braverman, 1974: 21, 22). braverman clearly argues here that technology is a product of social relations, and i think he is arguing, at least implicitly, that the bringing about of socialism involves not only the changing of social relations, but the changing of machines in the process, and his discussion of the soviet union yields this interpretation. 22 a rough climate for migration | 59 a rough climate for migration elaine kelly1 “understanding climate change as a security issue risks making it a military rather than foreign policy problem and a sovereignty rather than global commons problem .” (barnett, 2003, p .14) “this is the double law of hospitality: to calculate the risks, yes, but without closing the door on the incalculable, that is, on the future and the foreigner . it defines the unstable site of strategy and decision .” (derrida, 2005, p . 6) introduction in 2010, writer and director michael nash released a film detailing the impact of climate change and environmental degradation in terms of mass migration. nash’s film, titled climate refugees has since gone around the world, gaining official selection into countless film festivals. according to information contained on the official website http://www.climaterefugees. com, the film has made its way across much of the united states, presumably in an effort to educate americans about the global nature of climate change as well as possible impacts at a domestic level with regard to displacement and migration. a call for political action, the film places emphasis on the negative implications of neglecting climate issues, casting this in terms of threats to national security. given its dominant market (so far), its cover imagery of the u.s. and south america across a face, and its inclusion of prominent american academics, scientists and politicians, such as al gore, paul ehlrich and lester brown, it is not unreasonable to assume that u.s. national security is an important theme of the film. in fact, approximately two minutes into ‘trailer two’ is the following quote from navy vice admiral lee f. gunn: 1 elaine kelly is chancellor’s postdoctoral candidate at the university of technology, sydney, australia. her work examines the political, ethical and scientific issues associated with the climate-migration nexus. she is particularly interested in the works of jacques derrida and the concept of hospitality in the context of climate-migration. she can be reached at: elaine.kelly@uts.edu.au 60 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times addressing the changes in the earth’s climate is not simply about saving polar bears and preserving the beauty of the mountain glaciers. climate change is a threat to our national security. “climate change is a threat to our national security”. such a statement reveals some potentially important implications for policy directions in relation to international or cross-border climate-induced migration. an issue that has no formal recognition or (inter)national structures2, environmental migration remains in a policy vacuum. this leaves it open to be being absorbed by a security platform. thus the contention of this paper is that if work is not done to assert an ethical foundation for responding to climate-induced migration, law and policy will be dominated (in and for the global north) by a national security paradigm. this is already an emerging trend with countries such as australia deploying the navy in ‘deter and deny’ migration strategies, and the us drawing heavily upon the military following the devastating earthquake in haiti in 2010, an example i will return to later in this paper. while the nation-state is usually assumed in security studies to be the bedrock for stability, i argue that it can be viewed as an active agent in producing insecurity when we examine the north-south divide and the ways in which in the global north disaster narratives promote apocalyptic visions of environmental migration which in turn perpetuate racialised discourses of invasion and fear. for instance, one article warns of the 50 million environmental refugees who are set to “flood the global north by 2020” (smh, 2011) or another which reports that ‘mexican “climate migrants” predicted to flood us’ (naturenews, 2011). this nightmarish narrative functions in the global north to stall policy development, while in the global south many states continue to deal with the reality of regional and internal mass migration. against the logic that posits this as a regional problem, i agree with warner et al ., who argue that solutions must be thought through at a global level (warner et al, 2009). from here, i consider the privileged nation-state as bound up with the production of insecurity in numerous ways. firstly, in relation to the ongoing complicity of many privileged states in the emission of the 2 legal scholarship on climate refugees and environmental migration is available, but has not been put into action by the international community at present. see: bierman and boas, 2008; warner et al ., 2009. moreover there is a debate amongst legal scholars as to what mechanism and definitional system would be most appropriate. this paper is concerned with the dominance of national securisation and the impact of having no protective framework rather than with outlining the positions within this debate. a rough climate for migration | 61 very pollutants that contribute to environmental and climate displacement and migration. in 2007, namibian’s representative to the united nations, kaire mbuende, reportedly referred to the continued levels of greenhouse gas emissions by developed nations as equivalent to “low intensity biological and chemical warfare” (cited in brown et al ., 2007, p. 1142). secondly, in relation to the policing of borders and the militaristic management of ‘mass migration’ and, thirdly, in reference to the ways in which these more dominant states may override another state’s sovereignty or decision-making capacity in the event of natural disaster (or in the future, climate change disaster). this shifts the discourse away from positioning the privileged nation-state as a potential victim, in the position of impeding insecurity from waves and floods of migration, and toward an understanding of its active role in sustaining the conditions of instability and indeed insecurity for vulnerable states and populations. throughout, i shift between examples of more broadly understood environmental disaster such as the 2010 earthquake in haiti, and more specific climate change issues. this shifting is not to be understood as a conflation of environmental disasters with climate-related events. rather, haiti is drawn upon because it exemplifies the manner in which existing policy patterns toward specific forms of migration will contribute to, if not determine, potential responses to climate-related disasters in the future. moreover, because the effects of climate change on migration are difficult to determine in advance, it is useful to “use past and current experiences as analogous” (tacoli, 2009, p. 517). by calling into question the logic of security at play, this paper attempts to disrupt the dominant political vocabulary of national security and securitisation more generally in relation to matters of migration and climate. securitisation refers to the copenhagen school’s paradigm which regards security as the “social practice” of constructing an issue as a threat (trombetta, 2008, p. 588). this in turn permits the suspension of the normal order of things and the deployment of a “‘decisionist’ attitude which emphasizes the importance of reactive emergency measures” (trombetta, 2008, p. 588). heeding mark neocleous’ call for an “alternative political language” to contend with the dominance of securitisation (neocleous, 2008, p. 186), i present the concept of hospitality as one way that we may be able to ethically engage with and prepare for climateinduced migration; to engage at the “unstable site of strategy and decision” (derrida, 2005, p. 6) without shutting out the foreigner or reducing politics to the identification of enemies, as in schmitt’s logic.3 derrida’s 3 see huysman, 2006. 62 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times double law of hospitality refers to the notion that a fundamental unconditional openness must negotiate with the imperative to condition gestures of hospitality via programmes, rights discourse, and other policies, and vice versa, that the latter cannot be closed off. using derrida i argue that the concept of hospitality provides us with greater scope for ethical engagement with the issue. in so doing, i compare the mobilisation of the military by the us following the earthquake in haiti to the gesture of radical hospitality put forth by senegal president abdoulaye wade. rather than bracketing ‘hospitality’ off as a utopian or unrealistic ideal, i argue that it must contest the political vocabularies that constitute the climate-security discourse. securitising climate-migration literature dealing with issues of security tends to be interdisciplinary in scope and thus encompasses a wide range of approaches. it is consequently impossible to generalise about the ‘field’. a dominant area of research however concerns national security which is, according to lester brown, “as old as the nation-state” itself, but took on greater significance post-wwii when it was reduced, from this period until the end of the cold war, to military might with a “policy of continual preparedness” (brown, 1977, p. 4). underpinning the operation of national security is a belief that the political and economic structures of the nation-state provide stability and protection, and that threats external may undermine this (traditionally this specified war/military threats). before i get to an analysis of the potential response to climate migration to the global north, it seems imperative to outline and analyse the ways in which security is tied to the nation-state and the development of this field to encompass the environment, migration and more recently, climate change.4 this discussion is important in order to contextualise issues of migration and demonstrates the dominance of the security model when discussing the environment and climate change. lester brown’s foundational piece, redefining national security (1977), marks a discursive shift away from national security as a military issue and toward understanding the relationship between man and nature in terms of security. brown outlines the environmental basis of much polit4 anthropocentric climate change has and will continue to result in the increased frequency, duration and force of harsh weather events (storms, hurricanes and droughts for example), as well as rising sea levels. such events occur in addition to more broadly understood environmental problems such as desertification, soil erosion, resource depletion, an expanding population and natural disasters such as earthquakes. a rough climate for migration | 63 ical conflict, the importance of energy and resources, and the manner in which the economy is dependent upon the biosphere for its raw materials. it stands to reason then that if domestic political and economic stability is the objective of national security imperatives, the environment would need to be accommodated under such an umbrella. brown concludes that “the purpose of national security deliberations should not be to maximize military strength but to maximize national security” (brown, 1977, p. 37). over fifteen years later, joseph j. romm likewise notes that the broadening of security outside of traditional military concerns and into areas like the environment witnesses the diminishing import of military security (romm, 1993, p.1). in this sense, widening the concept acknowledges the diversity of issues that may impact the nation-state’s sense of wellbeing as well as the variety of possible ways of responding to problems. theoretically, ‘human security’ goes a step further, shifting the emphasis away from the state and toward the individual.5 however, even as the discourse of security is now recognisable in discussions outside of traditional military concerns, the alignment of the environment as a defence issue has become increasingly apparent. as richard a. matthew tells us, while many, especially environmentalists, saw the defence industry as inextricably bound up with the problems of ecological disaster, the environment soon emerged as an aspect of national security and, from the 1980s onward in the united states, continued to be included in its agenda (matthew, 2000, p. 105). despite some reservations on the left side of political activism, many fought for the inclusion of environmentalism in the national security policy domain (matthews, 2000, p. 107). with this move, matthew marks precisely what is at stake: while inclusion may have initially been desired as a result of a fear that without any recognition of the problem at a national level the response would be one of neglect and continued environmental degradation, the contemporary context reveals to us the costs of such inclusion. in the decision to include environmental security into its defence agenda, a large range of economic, social and political issues could now be interpreted utilising the rubric of defence and the apparatus of the military. 5 roland paris’ much cited text “human security: paradigm shift or hot air” (2001), suggests that the umbrella term human security is too broad to assist policy makers or academic researchers alike. in a different manner, migel de larrinaga and marc g. doucet in “sovereign power and the biopolitics of human security” (2008), argue that the paradigm of human security extends the reach of sovereign and biopolitical modalities of power. in this sense, taking an approach popularised by giorgio agamben they contend that human security is simply another means via which sovereign power takes hold of life. 64 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times drawing diverse issues under the same umbrella of securitisation has the effect of, as jef huysmans notes regarding migration, determining the operation of the political as the identification of an “existential” threat, in the tradition of politics handed down since schmitt (huysmans, 2006, p. 126). across the global north–for instance, in the eu6, australia, and the us–unexpected migration has witnessed the deployment of the military, something which united states naval war college associate professor paul smith writes, “partially reflects a paradigm shift in how international migration is being considered. what was once a social or labor issue has now transformed often into a security matter” (smith, 2007, p. 628). following this, smith argues that while this may present a workable short-term solution for the ‘host’ state, in the long-term, states must confront the “dilemma” of “how to accommodate the predicated surge in environmental migrants” (smith, 2007, p. 633). the dominance of the security paradigm can be seen in recent efforts to lock down a concept of climate security which can then be effectively mobilised by policymakers, extending its reach from environmental and migration discourse into climate change. steen nordstrom has suggested that even though climate change is an “odd security problem to address” (nordstrom, 2010, p. 6), because it is a “threat multiplier” it needs to be more tightly tied to national security and multilateral discussion forums (nordstrom, 2010, p. 9). again the language of threat dominates. because migration is a knock-on or one of the threats multiplied by unstable climatic conditions, one can only assume then that it should be subsumed under the umbrella of national security. indeed, joshua w. busby has contended that the “spillover from neighbours” may in turn require “military mobilization to contain the population movement or provide essential services” (busby, 2008, p. 477). in the following section, this blurring of humanitarian aid and military mission in the interests of national security will be discussed. marie julia trombetta recognises the difficulty of implementing climate security, arguing that its complexity arises in the paradoxical need to both transform and protect “the existing economic structure and way of life” (trombetta, 2008, p. 591). while environmental security takes account of the entire biosphere, climate security concerns the “maintenance of stable climatic conditions as a prerequisite of all human enterprises” (trombetta, 2008, p. 595). the ambition to secure stable climatic conditions is central to the issues of displacement and migration 6 smith (2007, p.628) notes that the eu’s border protection agency, frontex, utilises the military regularly. a rough climate for migration | 65 which arise when climatic conditions are destabilised and chaotic. and yet, the desire to tie political action to a notion of climate security reads ambiguously. how would this be achieved? normative questions of responsibility arise: if a nation-state has benefited historically from high carbon emissions should it take on more migrants/refugees? how can we weigh this against the host nations own sustainability needs? how can we think through hospitality in this setting? it is at this juncture–of sustainability and social justice–that states need to do ethical work. even as the difficulties, paradoxes and oddities of merging climate and security are signposted by academics, the coupling of climate change with security, and thus the association to “potential or real threat” (liotta, 2005, p. 49) can be seen in the establishment of major government and non-government bodies such as the cia’s centre on climate change and national security in late september 2009.7 indeed this development builds on what john tirman has highlighted as the ways in which security discourse has taken a leading role in the administration and regulation of immigration post 9/11 in the us (tirman, 2006). in addition to the formation of national bodies, the united states department of defence quadrennial defence review report 2010, which provides an overview of the strategic framework for its national defence force, includes the subsection “creating a strategic approach to climate and energy”. in this brief section we are told that that climate change, alongside energy, will play a key role “in shaping the future security environment” (p. 84). taking a holistic approach, the document notes that “climate change, energy security and economic stability are inextricably linked” (p. 84). this echoes brown, writing almost 40 years earlier, rhetorically tying national security to sustainability (even the defence force is involved in making its operations more ecologically sustainable!). the preservation or defence of the environment and climate is crucial for continued economic prosperity. the conclusion is drawn that the military as well as civil bodies will be required to deal with “instability or conflict” resulting from climate change (p. 85). interestingly, mass migration is mentioned once briefly and cautiously–pointing to the possibility that national responses will privilege national security over other possible modes of engagement. the move toward heightened border protectionism8 is crucial to scrutinise given the role of such privileged nation-states in the emergence of anthropocentric climate change as well as the uneven burden 7 see https://www.cia.gov/news-information/press-releases-statements/center-on-climatechange-and-national-security.html. 8 see paul smith (2007) for an overview of the various ways in which military security paradigms have been employed against migrants. 66 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times the global south will be dealt in terms of migration (tacoli, 2009, p. 515).9 in the context of climate change and migration the apparatus of security extends in two directions: one, it simultaneously, and from afar, contains migratory movements by positing responsibility as a local or regional issue, rather than a global concern, a point reflected in the failure to generate an international definition of a climate and/or environmental migrant or refugee. as simon dalby has noted, “spatial strategies of containment” have always been part of security discourse (dalby, 2002, p. 38). even as pre-established migration routes suggest a local or regional trajectory, there needs to be a global focus to policy outlook and an appreciation of “mobility...as part of the solution rather than the problem” (tacoli, 2009, p. 514). part of this solution needs to be the reintroduction of hospitality into the debate. this would challenge the current practice of “warehousing” refugees, or what u.s committee for refugee’s executive director, levinia limón, referred to as “coercing people who have fled persecution to live in crowded, destitute and dangerous encampments” (limón cited in fernandes, 2007, p. 142). secondly, as outlined above, in the global north, securitising migration promotes the deployment of the military in the event of mass migration, setting security against hospitality or ethics, and short-term reactionary politics against long term legislative and policy development. while there seems to be an acknowledgement of the difficulty yet urgency of defining climate-induced migration, there is little argument over the fact that numbers are increasing (kalin, 2010, p. 82). according to norman myers, a conservative estimate of environmental migrant numbers in the 1990s was 25 million, more than the figure of traditional refugees at the time (myers, 2002, p. 609). current figures put this between 50 million and as high as one billion by 2050 (christian aid, 2007), with 200 million often repeated (iom). many of these migrants come from “impoverished communities” (myers, 2002, p. 612) where the environment has exceeded its carrying capacity and can no longer sustain life. scholars indicate that when migration occurs it is usually regionally focused, leaving neighbouring countries in the position of having to negotiate large numbers of new arrivals (matthews, 1989; myers, 2002; ramlogan, 1996; swain, 1996; fernandes, 2007; tacoli, 2009). as feldman and hsu have pointed out, it is not simply a matter of chance that the effects of environmental damage, destruction and harm are unevenly 9 as tacoli (2009) indicates, only a small proportion of movement is global in scope, with most migration occurring regionally or even within the same state (rural to rural, urban to urban or rural to urban). a rough climate for migration | 67 distributed. they argue that the “distribution of environmental burdens and risks reflects the legacies of racialisation and colonialism” (feldman & hsu, 2009, p.199; also see dalby, 2002). when the political response by states such as the us, australia and the european union to the migration of peoples characterises their movement as illegal through, in the case of climate-induced migration, a failure of recognition, it could be argued that a model of security is reiterated in which racial privileging protects some at the expense of others (feldman and hsu 2009, p. 199). ashok swain reveals to us the fact that for years marginal peoples have called for an expansion of the concept of refugee beyond the post-wwii definition, which can be viewed as somewhat eurocentric in nature. swain informs us that the organisation of african unity as well as central american bodies have lobbied for change and greater inclusion (swain, 1996, p. 964). more recently, bangladesh’s finance minister, abul maal abdul muhith, noted that “the convention on refugees could be revised to protect people. it’s been through other revisions, so this should be possible” (grant, randerson and vidal, 2009). stalled political action and legal implementation forces us to question the reasons for such reluctance to either re-define refugee or open up new categories of protection. p.h liotta suggests that when threats are not deemed to be immediate and undeniable the political response is often one of refusal followed by reactive action: given the uncertainty, the complexity, and the sheer non-linear unpredictability of creeping vulnerabilities, the frequent–and classic– mistake of the decision maker is to respond with the ‘gut reaction’: the intuitive response to situations of clear ambiguity is, classically, to do nothing at all . the more appropriate response is to take an adaptive posture. (liotta, 2005, p. 52) a reactive reaction can be juxtaposed to “an adaptive posture”, which i suggest can be read as one open to the uncertainty inherent to hospitality (unconditional hospitality) while also preparing in advance–adapting–to changing circumstances (conditional hospitality). a security apparatus is mobilised in a reactive manner by global north states and forecloses or dramatically restricts both a conditional economy of hospitality, and unconditionality. moreover, in the movement from reaction to adaptation, a ‘threat’ can be re-signified. in this instance, while legal recognition has its limits, a more ethically informed conditional hospitality can be attained which responds to the needs outlined by vulnerable countries. 68 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times for the global north then, the failure (or refusal?) to adapt protocols for protection or regulation leads then to the adoption of military tactics when confronting migration and reproduces a racialised apparatus of security in which privileged states must be protected from potential mass migration, while poorer states are left to deal with growing numbers of displaced peoples. here i draw again on feldman and hsu who understand “racialisation as, in part, a function of differentially distributed vulnerabilities” (feldman & hsu, 2009, p. 204).10 while there is an acknowledgment that some locales are more vulnerable to the impact of climate change, for instance the works of myers and others brings to light the uneven effects of climate change; legacies of racialisation and colonialism are not fleshed out for their ongoing significance. in fact, the language deployed by myers in his book ultimate security re-inscribes the sorts of racial fear invoked more casually in mainstream media. the rhetoric of flooding, spreading and waves, of poverty and destruction, has the effect of portraying such peoples in homogenising ways with the logic of ‘us’ and ‘them’ implicitly apparent. for example, take the following excerpt from myers: we could eventually (or soon?) witness multitudes of despair-driven migrants heading from tropical asia toward “empty” australia, from china toward siberia, from latin america toward north america, and from africa toward europe… the repercussions would be profound. refugees often arrive with what is perceived by host communities as “unwanted luggage” in the form of alien customs, religious practise, and dietary habits, plus new pathogens and susceptibility to local pathogens. resettlement is generally difficult, full assimilation is rare. economic and social dislocations would proliferate, cultural and ethnic problems would multiply, and the political fallout would be extensive if not explosive (myers, 1993, p. 200-1). 10 at the time of writing this paper, a humanitarian catastrophe is occurring in the horn of africa, where at least 10 million people are affected by drought with many moving toward large refugee camps in the region. while i cannot do justice to this issue in this paper, the emergency presents us with an example of what limón refers to as “warehousing”. near the borders of ethiopia and somalia, the dadaab camp usually holds 90,000 people at capacity, but currently has 400,000 people with more waiting to be processed. while not all of these people may be requesting resettlement in another country, all are moving because their homelands are at least temporarily unable to nourish them. in response, the british are leading the way with aid packages, pledging firstly £38 million and then another £52.25 million. a rough climate for migration | 69 although potentially well-intentioned (as a call for action to mitigate environmental destruction), myers’ disaster narrative positions the racialised ‘other’ as a bringer of disease, disorder, and incompatible cultural differences which may lead to conflict and political breakdown. the global north faces invasion by “multitudes of despair-driven migrants”. dalby expresses this well when he writes that such representational strategies highlight “the modern impulse to control and the medical tropes of endangerment and disease, abnormality and threat” (dalby, 2002, p. 154). myers’ scenario negatively overemphasises the risks and dangers of extending hospitality. such framing is unhelpful to any constructive efforts to understand the necessary and inevitable role that migration and resettlement will play in the future.11 from this we can see that from the representational economies perpetuated in media, academic texts and so on, to the positions held by governments, security is privileged over hospitality; they are, in fact, placed in opposition to one another. in this section, i have traced the way in which environmental, migration and climate issues have been included in security debates. these debates have attempted to move beyond the national paradigm. by introducing a discussion of climate-induced migration, i have suggested that despite this conceptual development, the nation-state continues to hold enormous power over the scope of policymaking with a policy vacuum at the international level in relation to climate and environmentally-induced migration. this in turn reiterates a racialised north-south divide, with the global south carrying most of the impacts of environmental migration. finally, i have started to highlight the potential for military models of security to become the norm in privileged states in response to the possibility of environmental and climate-induced disaster migration. in the next section, i will focus on the us response to the haiti earthquake in 2010 in order to develop this line of argument. 11 that hospitality is not on the agenda for the global north is evidenced in the unfolding horn of africa humanitarian crisis where emergency aid tops the international agenda (and rightly so), but the possibility of global gestures of hospitality in terms of resettlement is not addressed. while it is undeniably important to restore homelands, to provide funding for infrastructure and local resilience strategies, the plight of hundreds of thousands of peoples demands measures which extend beyond the maintenance of refugee camps. 70 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times a rough climate for migration “border security–and the ability to decide who comes in and who is excluded–is an essential aspect of state sovereignty .” (smith, 2007, p . 621) it has almost become a truism to say that humans have for thousands of years moved in response to climate, either opportunistically or as a result of circumstance (see carto et al ., 2009; mcleman and smit, 2006). with the system of nation-states firmly established since the treaty of westphalia in 1648, movement has been read through a paradigm of sovereign rights and responsibilities. the logic that paul smith expresses– that border security is central to state sovereignty–has been echoed in politics and law with, for instance, the former australian prime minister stating that “[w]e will decide who comes to this country and the conditions in which they come” (howard, 2001) following an influx of asylum seekers arriving by boat from iraq, afghanistan and iran between 1999 and 2001.12 this mode of politics, one which barnett–in the quote which opens this paper–refers to as a security paradigm tying military efforts and sovereignty together (barnett, 2003, p. 14), contains an extremely conditional version of hospitality reliant upon invitations. barnett contends that a paradigm change is needed in which climate change should be put under the banner of foreign policy and regarded as a global commons concern. what this means is that it must look outward instead of inward; it must understand the nation-state as in-relation with other states and non-state actors. in our current political environment and imagination turning to foreign policy may only confirm the priority of the nation-state even as it demands global engagement and puts into question traditional understandings of responsibility, ownership and sovereignty. while this shift in perspective has potential, its relationship to security discourse needs to be carefully thought through. part of this demands that we disentangle hospitality from discourses of insecurity and threat. in ‘the case against linking environmental degradation and national security’ (1990), daniel deudney carefully thinks through the ramifications of linking the environment with security. writing in response to figures such as jessica t. matthews and lester brown, deudney contests the relevance of national security–as concerned with interstate violence–with the environment. there are two other points deudney highlights that have importance for this paper. firstly, deudney points out that national security has traditionally been understood as imposing a form of “organised violence” (deudney, 1990, p. 462) 12 see pugliese, 2002; perera, 2002. a rough climate for migration | 71 and secondly, nationalism is always coupled with national security. indeed, deudney argues that “[n]ational security thinking and action is all premised upon a relatively sharp distinction between ‘us’ and ‘them’, between friend and foe” (deudney, 1990, p. 467). thus, if we continue to promote a national security approach to climate change and environmental migration, the baggage of nationalism comes along too, with strong racialised distinctions between ‘us’ and ‘them’, between ‘citizen’ and ‘foreigner’, and ‘friend’ and ‘enemy’. before considering ways in which we can intervene ethically into this complex political issue, ways that break down the reliance on national security, the case of the 2010 haiti earthquake will be discussed. is there a form of organised violence functioning in the actions of the us government, despite its humanitarian guise? is there a nationalistic sense of ‘us’ and ‘them’ evident in the response? what understanding of hospitality does this entail? is hospitality even possible within security regimes, or do we need an entirely different language? haiti: ‘compassionate invasion’? a compelling example of the use of a national security paradigm by the us is the event of the haitian earthquake of january 2010.13 the response to this crisis provides insights into ways in which climate security across national borders or in the name of defending one’s borders may in the future be militarised. the use of the us defence force for humanitarian aid following natural disaster is not something new. indeed in 2005, following hurricane katrina in new orleans, the us military was deployed to ‘restore order’ and assist with aid, with a ‘public health emergency’ declared, effectively placing new orleans under martial law.14 for the american critical theorist, henry giroux, hurricane katrina revealed a “politics of disposability” in which some us citizens were blatantly “abandoned” by the us government (giroux, 2006, p. 180). this systematic neglect, according to giroux, reflected larger racial and class divides in america, which came to determine a differential response in the event of disaster. the case of haiti takes on several additional troubling dimensions. although i am not focusing on the biopolitical dimensions of national security, it is possible to adjust and apply giroux’s critical framework to the situation in haiti and argue that a “politics of disposability” has been operational. departing from giroux, i am interested in the ways in 13 ‘compassionate invasion’ was how one times editor put it for mark thompson’s piece “the u.s. military in haiti: a compassionate invasion’, 12 january 2010. available online at: http:// www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1953379_1953494_1954326,00.html . 14 see giroux 2006, for a critical analysis of hurricane katrina. 72 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times which us national security measures contained any possible migratory movements out of haiti as well as the ways in which haitian sovereignty has been completely undermined in the year following the tragedy. this, in and of itself, may be considered an exercise of biopower as distinct from biopolitics (esposito, 2008, p. 15). according to roberto esposito, biopolitics, or “politics in the name of life” is sometimes conflated with “biopower” which refers to “life subjected to the command of politics” (esposito, 2008, p. 15). this is not what giroux does, preferring the term necropolitics derived from achille mbembe to discuss life negatively affected by politics–disposable life–and deploying the term biopower in relation to the operation of racialised and classed neoliberalism: given the increasing perilous state of the those who are poor and dispossessed in america, it is crucial to re-examine how biopower functions within global neoliberalism and the simultaneous rise of security states organised around cultural (and racial) homogeneity . this task is made all the more urgent by the destruction, politics, and death that followed hurricane katrina (giroux, 2006, p. 182, my emphasis). giroux’s inclusion of security states defined here as enforcing a “cultural (and racial) homogeneity” is a useful way to frame the response of the us to the haitian earthquake, and ties in with deudney’s argument concerning nationalism. the security apparatus around migration in the us-caribbean region has been developing since the 1980s, increasingly reinforcing national sovereignty and the right to protect its borders, and culminating in operation vigilant sentry introduced in 2007: this plan provides guidance for four, broad mass-migration activities: (1) at sea rescue and interdiction operations in response to a mass migration from cuba, haiti, or other caribbean nations; (2) deterrence and dissuasion; 3) land-based-law enforcement operations; and (4) migrant processing, protection, and detention procedures (homeland security fact sheet, 2007). deepa fernandes argues that haitians in particular have been “disproportionately targeted” by us immigration and homeland security measures (fernandes, 2007, p. 123). for instance, fernandes brings our attention to the automatic denial and deportation of haitians arriving by boat while historically refugees from neighbouring nations like cuba are provided the opportunity to apply for asylum (fernandes, 2007, p. a rough climate for migration | 73 133), a point overturned with the passage of vigilant sentry. that haitians occupy a particular place as a security threat in the us imaginary is highlighted by two things in particular. firstly, it was in 1972 with the arrival of haitians fleeing political violence that indefinite detention was introduced, and secondly, the us government’s funding of the haitian coast guard (fernandes, 2007, p.135-138). it is against this background that the response to the 2010 earthquake must be read. on 12 january 2010, an earthquake of 7.0 magnitude struck the small island state of haiti leaving its major city, port-au-prince, in ruin and resulting in the death of 300, 000 locals.15 the response of the us government was swift and significant, with a massive deployment of military personnel issued within hours; “one of the globe’s biggest warships” in addition to 10,000 troops (thompson, 2010). in the words of times journalist mark thompson, “haiti for all intents and purposes, became the 51st [american] state…[or] ward of the state” (thompson, 2010). while this is certainly true in terms of the liberties the us government took with haitian state sovereignty, the us government did not extend all of the benefits of us citizenship to haitian victims of the earthquake.16 thompson’s language is of import here: to become a ward of the state is to be placed under the state’s care, to be regarded as unfit to govern oneself, a condition usually placed upon minors who are deemed to no longer have adequate parental supervision. this move has been discussed with reference to colonisation across a range of contexts, with designated populations being under the control of the coloniser’s law while not offered citizenship. that the us sought to dominate aid and, later, reconstruction efforts, undermines the political independence of haiti, the ‘first black republic’ in the world (overthrowing its french colonisers in the late 18th/early 19th century). repeating the phrase “only the u.s. military” throughout the second half of the article, thompson’s nationalistic piece gives the impression that the us government has taken on the responsibility of a big brother, compassionately pouring resources into the vulnerable region, taking the lead–even outnumbering the international community efforts with only 9,000 un peacekeepers initially sent out (thompson, 2010). the actions of the us government to this natural disaster were, from the outset, framed in terms of national security even as they sought to provide essential aid. the use of such a paradigm for an environmental 15 the haitian population is approximately 10 million. 16 the us government did provide temporary rights to undocumented haitians in the us at the time of the disaster, but this ended in february 2011 when the us started deporting 4,000 undocumented haitian immigrants back to haiti. 74 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times catastrophe makes it a relevant example for more speculative discussions of climate security and migration to the global north. the us government did not make any secret of its security imperatives, immediately deploying its national security team led by deputy national security adviser, denis mcdonough (thompson, 2010). the us gained air traffic control at the major airport in port-au-prince, regulating the arrival of aid and international personnel and, perhaps equally importantly, who could leave haiti (afp, 2010). the impact of this was heavily scrutinised in the media when a group of critically ill patients scheduled to be flying out of haiti to florida for immediate care, were delayed treatment for four days (padgett, 2010). it has been reported that the majority of us money was spent on military endeavours with only a small amount allocated to the haitian government to spend on food for its displaced population (which exceeded one million in the capital city). haitian president rene preval’s comments were paraphrased by democracy now! journalist in the following manner: “his government is receiving less than a penny for each dollar the us spends on aid efforts in haiti. thirty-three cents of every dollar goes to us military aid, over three times the nine cents spent on food” (democracy now!, 2010). aid and defence worked hand in hand with a large navy hospital anchored off the coast of haiti. thus, in addition to securing the right to control the airport, the us government’s deployment of a navy hospital in conjunction with coast guard worked to prevent passages across the sea to miami, only 681 miles away from the small island. the show of force was clear: us coast guard commander christopher o’neal saying that “the goal is to interdict them at sea and repatriate them” conforming to the directives of operation vigilant sentry outlined above (cited in rezouni, 2010, p.12; waterfield, 2010). salaheddine rezouni has noted that immediately following the earthquake, “us soldiers in guantanamo bay have already set up tents and beds as a prudent measure to prepare for possible refugees” (rezouni, 2010, p. 12). thus, guantanamo bay, a site of exception from us law whilst firmly under its jurisdiction, would function as an ad hoc emergency detention camp in the event of mass migration. this provision had been initiated in the early 1990s by george bush senior, who set up guantanamo bay for use “as a refugee camp exclusively for haitians” (fernandes, 2007, p. 136). if we are to understand biopower as the subjugation of life to the demands of political power, in this instance a foreign sovereign force has effectively sought control over movement of bodies out of another sovereign territory, as well as blocking off the avenues for migration across the a rough climate for migration | 75 sea. the decision to intervene in haiti and assume a degree of sovereign right perhaps signals a changing conception of sovereignty in the era of climate change and natural catastrophe. such changes are not geared toward recognising interdependence and forming cooperative forms of responsible action or “shared identity”, a movement toward globalism (matthews, 1989, p.175); rather this example illustrates the vulnerability of another’s state sovereignty in the interests of us national security and us biopower. this occurred under the seemingly more ethical umbrella of humanitarian aid, but it is useful to recall deudney’s warning that “taken to the absurd extreme–as national security threat sometimes are–seeing environmental degradation in a neighbouring country as a national security threat could trigger various types of interventions, a new imperialism of the strong against the weak” (deudney, 1990, p. 468). writing twenty years ago, deudney’s fear can be seen unfolding in haiti at least, most explicitly, until the us military withdrew in late april 2010 and, implicitly, in the internationally organised reconstruction process which has followed. haitian writer and activist jean saint-vil argues that this reconstruction effort is “mobilizing resources to maintain the status quo” with all but two of the construction contracts given to us contractors (democracy now!, 2011). against this sort of response “[f]or those countries already dealing with large influxes of migrants, and for those likely to receive increasing numbers of migrants as a consequence of climate change, forward looking assessments and forward planning for climate immigrants should be a policy priority” (barnett, 2003, p. 12). moving beyond security: hospitality and the climate-migrant/refugee following the devastation in haiti, a gesture of hospitality shone through the wreckage and systematic organised violence of us national security. amidst the blurring of humanitarianism and militarism and the firm commitment to us power, the president of senegal, abdoulaye wade, offered land to haitian victims: “the repeated calamities that befall haiti prompt me to propose a radical solution: to take measures to create somewhere in africa, the conditions for haitians to return”. such a gesture of goodwill recognised an historical context of colonialism and slavery: “they did not choose to go to that island. it is our duty to recognise their right to come back to the land of their ancestors” (abc, 2010). more than this, on offer was fertile land, to ensure the sustainability of any potential community. while there was no mass permanent migration from haiti to senegal, by october 2010, 163 haitian students had been granted full 76 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times scholarships to study in senegal. even this gesture is exceptional given the economic backdrop in senegal where half the population is unemployed and literacy rates remain low (39.3%).17 in a speech to the students, president wade invoked the language of hospitality: “your ancestors left here by physical force...you have returned through moral force... you are neither strangers nor refugees. you are members of our family” (cited in bojang, 2010). this message was reinforced by iba der thaim, vice-president of senegal’s national assembly, when he spoke of giving the world “a lesson in humanity”: “senegal has shown that it’s in the hearts of the poor that you can find the gift of generosity...a country that is neither rich nor developed has agreed to share the little it has with its brothers” (cited in bojang 2010). while both officials deploy the language of brotherhood and familial ties, thus “introducing the circles of conditionality” (derrida, 2000a, p. 8), it was under the dominance of security discourse that this act of radical hospitality was put forward. i call this gesture radical because it goes beyond determined rights and responsibilities and speaks to the particularities of the situation. what are the solutions, radical or otherwise, that we in the global north, are willing to put forward? in the global north, it is necessary to re-think our conditional modes of hospitality (as well as our inhospitable responses) and learn to more ethically adapt to the unconditionality of hospitality. while it may read strangely to say that we must prepare for what we cannot know in advance, for the unexpected, this is precisely what much action in the realm of climate change requires. in so doing, there is an ethical necessity to move beyond the notion of security. while some have pointed out that the constructed nature of the discourse gives it the capacity to work in the name of progressive outcomes (see trombetta (2008) for instance, as well as the acceptance of the term ‘human security’), others have argued that the term is irredeemable (neocleous, 2008). trombetta’s claim that “[s]ecuritization is not about applying a fixed meaning of security as exceptionality that inscribes enemies in a context... it is ‘an always (situated and iterative) process’ [citing stritzel, 2007, 366] of generating meaning” (trombetta, 2008, p. 591), is correct. however, introducing hospitality as the lens through which we should plan for movements of people holds moral appeal and seeks to shortcircuit dominant security discourse. while security is discursively maintained, the dominance of militarisation in the realm of migration is evident in the ways in which many privileged nation-states are deploying deterrence techniques. 17 see: https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/sg.html a rough climate for migration | 77 as we have seen, in the context of climate change paul smith acknowledges the need to move beyond the security paradigm and in the direction of morally defensible positions, while jef huysmans’ analysis of migration demands that we rethink our understandings of the political, security and the relationship between the two. dalby also argues that a shift away from “exceptional measures” and toward “routine political and economic” procedures is important in de-securitising a range of issues (dalby, 2006, p. 10). barnett and tacoli both state the need to include mobility as part of any solution to climate-induced migration. however, such dispositions are not available from within the logic of militarisation which inherently requires the violent closure of the border and thus denies the question of ethics or a more pluralistic notion of politics (huysmans, 2006, p. 127). nor, i would argue, are they available within the discourse of security even if it does not automatically infer the use of the military. because security produces “a practice of exclusion: a practice of identity and being through exclusion” (burke, 2008, p. 5), the logic that motors policy and discourse around (national) security perpetuates a form of identity that is separate from the ‘other’ or, when pushed, views alterity as a threat to selfhood/statehood. a politics of (in)security assumes that a fully protected state can be realised through force, and the re-establishment of borders, something pursued under the rubric of national security. the need to root sovereignty in forms of national securitisation denies what butler thinks of as a preexisting interdependency and vulnerability, “an impressionability and violability that are ineradicable dimension of human dependency and sociality” (butler, 2004, p. xiv). as noted above, hospitality is a double law, requiring the movement between the unconditional and the conditional. this movement is deconstructive in the sense that rather than taking an either/or position, hospitality arises out of the negotiation of the two poles. this process is also bound up with the construction of subjectivity and statehood. hospitality involves the negotiation rather than reconsolidation of identity. as derrida writes it is “the foreigner...the one who, putting the first question, puts me in question” (derrida, 2000b, p. 3). why is this significant? returning to burke, we saw that security imposes a mode of identity premised upon exclusion. deconstructive reasoning challenges the possibility of discrete identities by emphasising the interdependent relationship between self/other, host/guest and so on. for derrida, the performance of hospitality is not merely the reiteration of the categories of host and guest, but demonstrates how they rely upon and challenge 78 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times one another. in this way, notions of interdependency and sociality are compatible with deconstructive engagements with hospitality and provide a theoretical foundation for ethically informed practice. i opened this paper with a quote from derrida which suggests that hospitality contains an inherent riskiness and incalculability. this has two central implications for proposing a political vocabulary of hospitality in the context of climate-migration. firstly, the acknowledgement of risk as something needing recognition could potentially be read as re-imposing the language of security, or justifying its presence (security is, after all, one strategy for eliminating or reducing potential risks). this raises the following questions: outside of security measures how can risk be responded to ethically? does hospitality as a conceptual alternative provide a way to take account of risk without returning us to a political space of threat and danger, characteristic of securitisation? it is at this critical intersection that further work is needed, work which exceeds the scope of this paper. secondly, in spite of every effort to calculate and prepare in advance, the incalculable remains. what this means is that even if we create protocols and legal frameworks of recognition, something will remain excessive to these measures and disrupt them. in this sense, derrida’s double law gives space for hospitality outside of legal imperatives. the implication for our concern is that the currently undefined nature of climate migration should not result in a default defensive reaction; rather, it is a chance for hospitality. this philosophical reorientation is where a new discussion of practices of hospitality can be generated, where perhaps we can “reorient the politics of the state” (derrida, 2001, p. 4). jon barnett’s argument, captured in the other quote opening this paper, suggests that we shift away from a military-sovereignty response to a foreign policy-global commons framework. this may provide us with a starting point for such a reorientation and is certainly compatible with the concept of hospitality. however, in order to avoid the exclusionary logic of security, this would need to renegotiate the binary relations of ‘us’ and ‘them’ or ‘inside’ and ‘outside’ and ‘host’ and ‘guest’ which tend to underpin foreign policy considerations. it is precisely by privileging a deconstructive language of hospitality that this may be achieved. in the domain of migration, this would require co-operative action and equitable responsibilitysharing at the level of programs, as well as rethinking concepts of identity and belonging at a conceptual level. it is here that the theoretical approach of a global commons discourse may be useful in conjunction with discourses of hospitality. if global commons regards a rough climate for migration | 79 ownership, sovereignty and responsibility in ways that stretch the dominant western tradition, understandings of host and guest and of citizen and foreigner may be able to be rethought. conclusion despite efforts to expand the security discourse beyond the state and to mark it as constructed, the “national referent dominates discussions of security” (barnett, 2003, p. 2). if national security inherently excludes the concerns of non-citizens by privileging national priorities, the protection of citizen rights and the “classic national security burden–ensuring its territorial inviolability” (romm, 1993, p. 4), i have asked if it is the most appropriate paradigm to utilise in response to climate-induced migration. my critical intervention is not an attempt to argue for the dissolution of the state in the name of a world of open borders. rather it seeks it highlight limitations and point toward the importance of ethical models that might help re-orient the response of privileged states to climateinduced displacement and migration. if our critical work has to take place within the context of nation-states, then it needs to imagine ethical solutions to major problems. part of this will involve making more central the language of hospitality. as such, this paper has offered a review of the dominant security literature and its inclusion of the environment, climate change and migration. from here, i sought to unpack and scrutinise the implications of tying climate-migration to a security paradigm. in response to the limitations of this coupling, i introduced the concept of hospitality, drawing particularly on jacques derrida’s interventions. references abc. (2010, january 18). senegal offers haitians a new home. abc news online. retrieved from: http://www.abc.net.au/news/ stories/2010/01/18/2794995.htm. afp. (2010, january 15). us takes over port-au-prince airport after haiti earthquake. news .com .au. retrieved from http://www.news.com.au/ breaking-news/us-takesover-port-au-prince-airport-after-haitiearthquake/story-e6frfku0-1225819945319. barnett, j. (2003). security and climate change. global environmental change 13: 7-17. bierman, f and boas i. (2008). protecting climate refugees: the case for a global protocol. environment. 50 (6): 8-16. bojang, s.(2010, october 14). senegal takes in haitian student refugees. the guardian. retrieved from: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/ oct/14/senegal-haiti-earthquake-student-refugees. 80 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times brown, l. (1977, october). redefining national security. worldwatch paper14 . washington d.c. worldwatch institute. brown o., hammill, a., mcleman, r. (2007). climate change as the ‘new’ security threat: implications for africa. international affairs, 83:6, 1141-1154. busby, j.w. (2008). who cares about the weather? climate change and u.s. national security. security studies, 17:3, 468-504. burke, a. (2008). in fear of security: australia’s invasion anxiety. port melbourne. cambridge university press: 1-14 (introduction only). butler, j. (2004). precarious life: the powers of mourning and violence. london and new york. verso. butler, j. (2010). frames of war: when is life grievable? london and new york. verso. carto, s.l, weaver, a. j, hetherington, r, lam, y, wiebe, e.c. (2009). out of africa and into an ice age: on the role of global climate change in the late pleistocene migration of early modern humans out of africa. journal of human evolution. 56: 139-151. climate refugees. (2010). retrieved from: http://www.climaterefugees.com/. dalby, s. (2002). environmental security. minneapolis. university of minnesota press. de larrinaga, m., and doucet.m.g. (2008). sovereign power and the biopolitics of human security. security dialogue. 39(5): 517-537. demoracy now! (2010, january 28). us military spending in haiti more than triples assistance to haitian government. retrieved from: http:// www.democracynow.org/2010/01/28/headlines#3. democracy now! (2011, january 12). haitian writer jean saint-vil: one year after earthquake, haitian population treated as a threat, not an asset. retrieved from: http://www.democracynow.org/2011/1/12/haitian_ writer_jean_saint_vil_one. derrida, j. (2000a). hostipitality. angelaki: journal of theoretical humanities, 5(3), 3-18. derrida, j., and dufourmantelle, a. (2000b). of hospitality. (trans. rachel bowlby). california. stanford university press. derrida, j. (2001). on cosmopolitanism and forgiveness. london. routledge. deudney, d. (1990). the case against linking environmental degradation and national security. millennium: journal of international studies, 19: 461-479. esposito, r. (2008). bios: biopolitics and philosophy, (t. campbell. trans.). minneapolis and london. university of minnesota press. feldman, m. b., and hsu, h. l. (2009). introduction: race, environment, and representation’, discourse, 29(2&3): 199-214. fernandes, d. (2006). targeted: national security and the business of immigration. new york. seven stories press a rough climate for migration | 81 homeland security fact sheet. (2007, march 2). fact sheet: operation vigilant sentry. retrieved from: http://www.hstfse.com/go/ doc/1038/148670/fact-sheetoperation-vigilant-sentry. howard, j. (2001, october 28). transcript of the prime minister. (speech delivered at the federal liberal party campaign launch, sydney). available online at: http://www.australianpolitics.com/news/2001/01-10-28.shtml. huysmans, j. (2006). ‘de-securitising migration: security knowledge and concepts of the political’, in the politics of insecurity: fear, migration, and asylum in the eu. usa and canada. routledge. giroux, h.a. (2006). reading hurricane katrina: race, class, and the politics of disposability. college literature. 33.3: 171-196. grant, h., randerson, j., vidal, j. (2009, december 4). uk should open its borders to climate refugees, says bangladeshi minister. the guardian. retrieved from: http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/nov/30/ rich-west-climate-change international organisation of migration. retrieved from: http://www.iom. int/jahia/jahia/complex-nexus. kalin, w. (2010). conceptualising climate-induced displacement. in climate change and displacement: multidisciplinary perspectives. ed. jane mcadam. oxford and portland, oregon. hart publishing. kelly, e. (2006). white hospitality: a critique of political responsibility in the context of australia’s anti-asylum seeker laws. continuum: journal of media and cultural studies. 20:4, 457-469. liotta, p.h. (2005). through the looking glass: creeping vulnerabilities and the reordering of security. security dialogue. 36(1): 49-70. mcleman, r, and smit, b. (2006). migration as adaptation to climate change. climatic change. 76, 31-53. matthew, r.a. (2000). the environment as a national security issue. journal of policy history. 12(1), 101-122. matthews, j.t. (1989). redefining security. foreign affairs. 68(2), 161-177. moon, b. k. (2007, september 24). ‘address to high-level event on climate change’. un news centre. retrieved from: http://www.un.org/apps/ news/infocus/sgspeeches/search_full.asp?statid=121. myers, n. (2002). environmental refugees: a growing phenomenon of the twenty-first century. philosophical transactions of the royal society of london b. 357, 609613. myers, n. (1993). ultimate security: the environmental basis of political instability. new york and london. w. w. norton & company, inc. nordstrom, s. (2010, march). climate security: from agenda-setting to policy. royal danish defence college. neocleous, m. (2008). critique of security. edinburgh. edinburgh university press. 82 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times padgett, t. (2010, january 31). who’s to blame for suspending haitian medevac flights? time. retrieved from, http://www.time.com/time/ specials/packages/article/0,28804,1953379_19534 94_1957926,00. html. paris, r. (2001). human security: paradigm shift or hot air. international security. 2(fall), 87-102. perera, s. (2002). a line in the sea: the tampa, boat stories and the border. cultural studies review. 8(1), 11-27. pugliese, j. (2002). penal asylum. borderlands e-journal. 1(1). states of america. retrieved from: http://www.defense.gov/qdr/images/ qdr_as_of_12feb10_1000.pdf. ramlogan, r. (1996). environmental refugees: a review. environmental conservation. 23, 81-88. rezouni, s. (2010). illegal immigration: causes, consequences, and national security implications. strategy research project. carlisle barracks, pa. army war college. retrieved from, http://www.stormingmedia. us/59/5902/a590225.html. romm, j. r. (1993). defining national security: the nonmilitary aspects . new york. council on foreign relations press. sydney morning herald. (2011, february 22). 50 million ‘environmental refugees’ by 2020, experts say. sydney morning herald. retrieved from, http://www.smh.com.au/ environment/climate-change/50-million-environmentalrefugeesby-2020-experts-say-20110222-1b31i.html smith, p. (2000). transnational security threats and state survival: a role for the military? parameters . army war college. us. 30(3). smith, p. (2007). climate change, mass migration and the military response. orbis, 51(4), 617-633. swain, a. (1996). environmental migration and conflict dynamics. third world quarterly. 17(5), 959-973. tacoli, c. (2009). crisis or adaptation? migration and climate change in a context of high mobility. environment and urbanisation, 21, 513-525. thompson, m. (2010, january 16). the u.s. military in haiti: a compassionate invasion. time. retrieved from, http://www.time. com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1953379_1953494_ 1954326,00.html. tirman, j. (2006, july 28). immigration and insecurity: post 9/11 fear in the united states. border battles: the u .s immigration debates . retrieved from, http://borderbattles.ssrc.org/tirman/ trombetta, m, j. (2008). environmental security and climate change: analysing the discourse. cambridge review of international affairs, 21:4, 585-602. a rough climate for migration | 83 warner, k & ehrhart, c, de sherbinin, a, adamo, s. & chai-onn, t. (2009). in search of shelter: mapping the effects of climate change on human migration and displacement . cooperative for assistance and relief everywhere. waterfield, b. (2010, january 19). haiti earthquake: us ships blockade coast to thwart exodus to america the telegraph. retrieved from, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/ centralamericaandthecaribbean/haiti /7030237/haiti-earthquake-usships-blockade-coast-to-thwart-exodus-toamerica.html. westing, a. h. (1992). environmental refugees: a growing category of displaced person. environmental conservation. 19, 201-207 84 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times stabilizing privatization | 85 stabilizing privatization: crisis, enabling fields, and public-private partnerships in canada — heather whiteside1 public-private partnerships (p3s) – or “cooperative ventures between the state and private business” (linder, 1999, p.35) – are now commonly used in canada to deliver public infrastructure such as hospitals, highways, water treatment facilities, and schools. however, despite their growing popularity, p3 arrangements are seldom able to provide better value for money than traditional public procurement given the higher costs associated with private financing and for-profit service delivery. problems of this sort were only further compounded during the recent global financial crisis as private financing became more expensive and difficult to secure, leading to several project delays and cancellations across the country (mackenzie, 2009). with the onset of a new round of fiscal austerity as of late, one might reasonably expect that this policy would be scrapped in favour of lower cost public procurement. instead, as of 2010, the p3 model is flourishing once again. this is particularly problematic given that these arrangements link important public services to highly volatile global financial markets and poorer value for money leads to additional unnecessary costs over the long run. the relatively quick recovery of the p3 model in the face of recent and longstanding concerns requires explanation. one obvious driver is neoliberal ideology and its dogged commitment to privatization. yet however accurate this explanation may be, on its own it is inadequate since it tells us very little about the specific policy forms that these normative commitments take. to this end, attention is paid here to the changes in public infrastructure decision-making that have occurred 1 heather whiteside is a ph.d. candidate in the department of political science at simon fraser university. she is the co-author of private affluence, public austerity: economic crisis & democratic malaise in canada (with stephen mcbride), and has published articles in journals such as studies in political economy, health sociology review, and socialist studies. 86 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism over the past decade which shore up the ideological underpinnings of privatization via p3. this is not to suggest that the normatively-based preference for p3s has disappeared, but it does point to its normalization within a public sector reoriented toward greater market dependence. this has helped to promote p3s over the long run and to stabilize their use more recently despite the growing list of drawbacks. this article makes two interrelated arguments. first, in canadian jurisdictions most enthusiastic for p3s – ontario and british columbia – p3 proliferation is encouraged through important changes within government made to capital planning procedures and bureaucratic decision-making, and new forms of institutional support for privatization. this constellation of new arrangements will be referred to here as a ‘p3 enabling field’.2 these provincial enabling fields normalize p3 use through the routinization, institutionalization, and depoliticization of this policy. routinizing p3 implementation involves the creation of infrastructure planning protocols and routines that deeply embed the language and calculus of the private for-profit sector into the heart of public policy making. institutionalizing support for p3s has been advanced through the creation of new capital planning procedures and public authorities, both of which create an air of permanency for this policy. finally, depoliticization through provincial p3 enabling fields helps to obscure the normative basis of p3 use by making it appear as though privatization is merely a pragmatic decision. depoliticization also occurs through the actual shift from public to private authority, making it both a strategy and a reality. however, given that p3 markets are vulnerable to the volatility of global finance, existing problems with the model (such as poor value for money) are exacerbated during times of crisis which can readily lead to collapsed/abandoned deals and crises of faith on the part of policy makers. this recently occurred when newly initiated projects – those in the high risk bidding or construction stages – were hard hit in 2008/9 when access to capital markets narrowed significantly. thus the second argument made here flows from the first: the subsequent stabilization and recovery of p3 use in canada after 2009 relates in large part to the routinizing, insti2 the use of this term has been inspired by, though differs from, jooste and scott’s (2012) discussion of p3 enabling fields. for them an enabling field is composed of a “network of new ‘enabling organizations’ (public, private, nonprofit)” (2012, p.151). these organizations include specialized p3 units, auditors general, private consultants, and advocacy organizations. while these actors are no doubt crucial to the maturation of p3 markets, by focusing only on organizations (essentially the ‘institutional support’ category of the enabling field as conceptualized here) their concept of an enabling field ignores legislation, capital planning frameworks, and supportive secondary reforms which are particularly important for p3s in canada. stabilizing privatization | 87 tutionalizing, and depoliticizing effects of provincial p3 enabling fields. this has led to the curious condition that p3s are now increasingly the new ‘traditional’ mode of public infrastructure procurement despite their longstanding inability to live up to the promises made by proponents.3 these arguments will be substantiated through a series of steps. first, the article discusses the (misleading) basis on which p3s are often justified in canada, and how problems with the private financing component in particular were compounded by the recent financial crisis. second, it describes the principal features of the p3 enabling fields that have been set up in ontario and bc, and examines how they routinize, institutionalize, and depoliticize privatization policy. public-private partnerships the canadian public sector is becoming increasingly reliant upon capitalist markets to deliver ‘public’ infrastructure and support services at all levels of government, and p3s are a leading way in which this occurs. p3 policy is typically passed off as a new and innovative approach to ‘alternative service delivery’ (e.g., see hodge and greve, 2005, p.7-8), as though partnering with for-profit partners is simply one innocuous option among many. however, p3s contribute to a transformation in the social relations of power, and therefore they should be more precisely understood to be a form of what david harvey (2003) calls ‘accumulation by dispossession’. reminiscent of ‘original accumulation’ as described by marx, dispossession involves the expansion of capitalist market relations in a number of ways, namely through the creation of new opportunities for profit making and by redistributing assets, thereby enhancing the breadth and depth of capitalist accumulation (harvey, 2003). this form of market expansion is achieved by incorporating into the realm of private accumulation that which has come to exist ‘outside’ of these circuits of capital (ibid). through this predatory mechanism, privatization opens up new investment and profit-making opportunities in three distinct ways. as discussed by ashman and callinicos (2006), privatization can involve commodification, recommodification, and/or state restructuring. their qualification of harvey’s argument is an important contribution as 3 this applies to hospital re/development in particular. though the numbers fluctuate over time, hospital p3s make up the majority of all p3 projects in bc and ontario, particularly with projects that cost in excess of $50 million (for up-to-date project lists see partnerships bc, n.d.; infrastructure ontario, n.d.). this has been relatively consistent over the past decade due to the strategic targeting of health care infrastructure in provincial infrastructure renewal plans. 88 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism privatization is not a homogenous process. commodification turns assets that were not previously commodities into private property which can be bought and sold in capitalist markets; recommodification converts what was once produced privately but subsequently taken over by the state back into a commodity; and restructuring creates a reliance upon private for-profit provision (ibid, p.121-123). p3s can involve commodification and/or recommodification, depending on the project, as well as state restructuring. the latter feature is of principal interest here and its key elements (routinization, institutionalization, and depoliticization) will be examined in subsequent sections.4 like other forms of privatization (e.g., selling state assets), p3s create new markets for capital through re/commodification. restructuring via p3s intensifies market dependence and awards greater authority and decision-making over public policy to private for-profit investors. sometimes labeled ‘privatization by stealth’ (e.g., cupe, 2003), p3s also allow for dispossession within potentially unprofitable or especially sensitive areas which would not otherwise be suitable candidates for more overt privatization initiatives. however, an important distinguishing characteristic of the p3 model is that while it features dispossession, state obligations to provide that particular good or service are not severed (grimsey and lewis, 2004, p.55). in other words, should the purported benefits of a p3 project fail to materialize, the public sector (i.e., taxpayer) ultimately remains on the hook. policy makers make several misleading claims to justify p3 use. transferring projects risks away from taxpayers and onto the shoulders of private partners is often touted as the central advantage of the p3 model (hodge and greve, 2005). the most common risks attributed to infrastructure projects are those relating to the site (tenure, access, suitability), design and construction (delays, weather, cost overruns), operation and maintenance (cost overruns), and financing (interest rate fluctuation, inflation). while these are indeed important concerns, the risks addressed in p3 contracts are restricted to those which can be insured against through market actors, thus excluding other forms of risk relevant to the public sector.5 for instance, this involves ignoring social concerns related to privatization (e.g., more precarious working conditions and lower quality services) and the creation of long run risk when the public sector is locked in to more 4 other aspects of p3s as accumulation by dispossession, particularly as this relates to the canadian public health care system, are addressed in whiteside, forthcoming 2013. 5 furthermore, the auditor general of ontario argues that a well-designed public procurement contract can adequately protect the public from many of these risks (especially cost overruns, delays, and design flaws). see ontario auditor general, 2008. stabilizing privatization | 89 expensive, inflexible, multi-decade p3 agreements. further, in practice risk transfer is often illusory given that private consortia build these costs into the price of their bids, and thus acceptance of risk translates into the anticipated profit margin of the private partner. this essentially cancels out public sector gains whilst the private partner is fully compensated by the state (cohn, 2004, p.8). risk transfer is a very lucrative arrangement for the private partner, with investors earning real rates of return of roughly 15-25 percent per year (gaffney et al., 1999, p.116; hodge, 2004, p.162). financial risk transfer played a large role in the justification of early p3s in canada (see loxley, 2010). these arguments rely on the belief that infrastructure ought to be funded by private firms, and financed by loans, particularly when government funds are scarce. in canada this rationale is in part ideological (i.e., the perception of public debt as a sign of mismanagement) and in part practical due to fiscal austerity. however p3s cannot actually reduce the financial obligations of the state, they are only able to mask costs since traditional infrastructure tends to be paid for upfront while p3s tend to be structured as lease arrangements, spreading payments out over time. whether or not p3s can actually deliver value for money and cost savings over the long run therefore becomes of primary concern. proponents base value for money (vfm) arguments on risk transfer as well as the neoclassical assumption that competition (in this case for the p3 contract) combined with the profit-maximizing behaviour of the private sector will result in lower overall project costs (loxley, 2010, p.2-3).6 there are a number of problems with these claims, the most important being the suggestion that private sector cost superiority will actually lead to lower public sector costs rather than being absorbed by the private partner in the form of higher profit (vining and boardman, 2008, p.15). these arguments also do not take into account social concerns produced by reducing labour costs and through a relaxation of standards (e.g., environmental, design, hiring and training). finally, claims that value for money is achieved through ‘on time’ and ‘on budget’ delivery must, of course, be confirmed through the empirical record. in canada like elsewhere many p3s have been delivered late and there have been serious cost overruns (e.g., see edwards and shaoul, 2002; mckee et al., 2006; mehra, 2005). compounding these more straightforward financial concerns is the methodological deception that occurs with vfm calculations. a central component of any vfm assessment is a comparison between the cost 6 see spronk, 2010 for a discussion of the normative assumptions used to justify privatization on the basis of ‘economic efficiency’. 90 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism of a p3 in relation to a public sector comparator (psc) – a hypothetical model created to represent the traditional delivery method. a key part of this process involves the application of a discount rate to the project costs in order to estimate the “cost of capital over time” which allows for considerations such as interest and inflation (partnerships bc, 2005, p.19). yet the choice of which discount rate to use is not a neutral decision, it is both political and controversial. the higher the discount rate, the more attractive the p3 option becomes since it favours expenditure in later years relative to that which is spent now (gaffney et al., 1999, p.117). as loxley (2012; 2010) indicates, even though there is no universally agreed upon discount rate, rates used to calculate vfm in ontario and bc are well above the uk’s best practice rate of 3.5%, often by 1-3 percent respectively. this practice makes it appear as though a p3 offers better value even in cases where cost savings fail to materialize. public-private partnerships and the 2008/9 global financial crisis many of the long-standing problems that accompany p3 projects were made even worse by the recent global financial crisis. the most obvious impact was the ratcheting up of costs associated with the private finance portion of newly initiated partnerships. prior to 2007 government borrowers in canada were able to secure interest rates that were, on average, 2 percent lower than those charged to private borrowers, but between 2007 and 2009 this increased to an average of 3 or 4 percent – making p3s nearly 70 percent more expensive than publicly funded infrastructure (when measured in present value terms) (mackenzie, 2009, p.2). transaction costs also increased as the timeframe for negotiations was lengthened due to financial market instability (drapak, 2009). this impacted p3 value for money as any unbiased assessment would have to favour the traditional procurement model on these grounds alone. along with increased costs came the implications of the credit crunch and changes in financial market dynamics. when the option to secure monoline wrapped bonds disappeared during the subprime meltdown, the main source of private financing used by p3s was suddenly eliminated.7 together these developments posed serious challenges for newly initiated projects (those that were in the bidding and construction stages) and led to a series of delays, renegotiations, and collapsed deals in 2008/9. 7 a monoline wrapped bond refers to when companies take out insurance against the risk that they will default on their debt (‘monoline’), and by using a high quality insurance group (‘wrapped’) debtors are able to secure very high credit ratings, leading to lower interest rates (see tett, 2007 for further detail). stabilizing privatization | 91 in canada the effects of the financial crisis began to show in mid-2008 and most projects that reached financial close at this time were smaller in scope and required only short term financing (canadian council for public-private partnerships [ccppp], 2009, p.1). several high profile and high cost deals also faced serious challenges during this time. with the port mann bridge p3, one of the private partners (macquarie infrastructure group) was unable to come up with the requisite $700 million and as a result the province of british columbia was forced to renegotiate the agreement in order to keep the project going (hunter, 2009). this renegotiation occurred just weeks before construction was scheduled to begin. with the fort st. john hospital p3 project, also in bc, financial market instability meant that a new private partner was needed to bailout the original private equity partner that had been contracted to finance the $268 million hospital (mackenzie, 2009, p.11). further, although the bc provincial government remained committed to actively pursuing p3 projects throughout the crisis, stimulus fund spending targeted speedier traditional infrastructure projects and decision makers suspended the requirement that p3s be first considered for all large infrastructure projects (mackenzie, 2009, p.10).8 other pro-p3 provinces faced similar problems. in ontario, for example, the niagara health systems p3 project, originally scheduled to begin construction in spring 2009, was delayed for several months when the private financing portion fell through (mackenzie, 2009, p.12). a new private financing partner then stepped in. rather than abandon p3 policy altogether, the province temporarily moved away from partnerships which relied on private financing. equally troublesome were the problems posed for operational projects. based on the assumption that projects could be refinanced periodically at projected rates, many existing p3s have secured financing for a shorter term than the life of the project. as mackenzie (2009) suggests, the rationale underpinning privately financed p3s therefore had a builtin expectation that the credit-fueled bubble would continue indefinitely. there was little prudence demonstrated despite p3-proponents often justifying partnerships on the basis of fiscal austerity, and promoters ignored the possibility of a looming financial crisis. fiscal recklessness such as this led scotland’s finance minister john swinney to label the use of private financing associated with p3s “one of the worst excesses of the age of financial irresponsibility” (fraser, 2009). 8 the requirement that p3s must be first considered for all large infrastructure projects has since been re-imposed. 92 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism crises of faith began to emerge in canada’s public sector as well. while labour unions and public service advocacy groups have long been vocal and determined opponents of p3s, the global financial crisis and its immediate aftermath also led several policy makers to publicly question their use. for instance, quebec health minister yves bolduc stated in 2009 that “p3s were not a religion” for his party (canadian union of public employees, 2009). the treasury board president, minister of transport, and minister of municipal affairs also cast doubt on the future of p3s in that province, and several proposed p3s were scrapped in favour of public procurement (ibid). altogether, the new and longstanding problems and widening opposition could have easily nurtured a movement away from the p3 model. that it has since rebounded was never inevitable, but rather the legacy of the p3 enabling fields created nearly a decade earlier. this constellation of initiatives stabilized the p3 model during the darkest days of the financial crisis and helped it subsequently recover given the reorientation of public policy and public sector decision-making that had been initiated several years earlier. p3 enabling fields in light of their troubled track record, governments seeking not to abandon p3 policy but to normalize its use have restructured and reoriented certain key elements of their public sectors. in addition to the expansion of, and enhanced public sector dependence on, capitalist markets that accompanies dispossession, p3s have also come to entail the application of private sector logic and rationale to public infrastructure and service delivery. these new rules, and the institutions that have been created to enforce and promote them, are conceptualized here as forming a ‘p3 enabling field’. over the long run, enabling fields promote dispossession through state restructuring, and on a more immediate level they help stabilize p3 policy during times of crisis – as witnessed in the wake of the 2008 global financial crisis. the p3 enabling fields set up by canada’s key p3 enthusiasts – the bc and ontario provincial governments – are composed of several crucial elements, including new capital planning frameworks, and new forms of institutional support for privatization.9 the capital planning changes relevant to these provinces are: bc’s capital asset management frame9 there are other legislative and supportive secondary reforms which have also been implemented although these contain elements unique to particular sectors (e.g., transportation and health) and therefore will not be addressed here. stabilizing privatization | 93 work (camf) and ontario’s infrastructure planning, financing and procurement framework (ipfp) and alternative financing and procurement (afp) model. new institutional support for p3s is now provided by specialized p3 units, named partnerships bc and infrastructure ontario. p3 enabling fields bc ontario capital planning frameworks camf (2002) ipfp (2004); afp (2004) institutional support partnerships bc (2002) infrastructure ontario (2005) capital planning frameworks in may 2002, the capital asset management framework (camf) was introduced in bc to serve as new “rules of the road” for public infrastructure development, governed by five best-practice principles: sound fiscal management, strong accountability, value for money, protecting the public interest, and competition and transparency (bc ministry of finance, 2002, p.1-2). the camf applies province-wide and all ministries, public sector agencies, and public organizations must now comply with these rules when seeking approval and funding for infrastructure projects. when it was first introduced, the ministry of finance made an effort to present the camf as being pragmatic, claiming that it “does not predetermine that every project will be a public-private partnership” (bc ministry of finance, 2002, p.1). the value for money camf document furthermore states that: “the framework does not assume that any one sector [public or private] is inherently more efficient in building and operating public assets. instead, it emphasizes that capital decisions will be based on a practical, project-specific assessment of a full range of options” (bc ministry of finance, n.d., p.5). yet pragmatism is more rhetorical than real since the camf also dictates that all capital project proposals in excess of $50 million must first be considered as p3s.10 cohn (2008, p.89) suggests that the camf shifts the bias away from traditional public procurement by “chang[ing] the terms of debate regarding p3s. instead of explaining why a p3 was justified, it [is now] necessary to explain why a p3 (or some other form of alternative service delivery) [is] not being employed”. less obvious but equally important are the implications of its focus on market-oriented notions of risk and the heavy emphasis placed on 10 from 2002-2008 this stipulation applied to all proposals above an even lower threshold of $20 million (since 2008 those in the $20-$50 million range are subject to a p3 screen which is used to determine whether a more comprehensive p3 evaluation should proceed) (bc ministry of finance, 2008). 94 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism identifying and valuating risk throughout the camf procedures. before a project can move beyond the initial proposal stage it is subjected to a risk-based assessment which assumes that additional responsibilities bring greater risks, and thus risk can be mitigated and minimized through partnership agreements. this creates an innate bias against public financing and ownership given that any new infrastructure project taken on by a public sector agency is assumed to generate risk. risks are then monetized and added onto publicly delivered projects, penalizing public procurement even though these risks may be entirely hypothetical. reliance upon the private sector to reduce risk also ignores the potential for cost savings that can be achieved through risk pooling (i.e., publicly financing a large number of projects), which can amount to a huge loss for the citizen and taxpayer. mackenzie’s (2007, p.iv) study of alberta p3 schools found that “for every two schools financed using the p3 model, an additional school could be built if they were all financed using conventional public sector financing.” the camf also enshrines a market-based notion of what defines the public interest. under the camf this feature of policy making is to be determined through criteria such as assessing service outcomes (mediated by monetary relations) and monitoring the performance of service providers (using market-based contracts). this is an extremely narrow conception of the public interest and does not take into consideration other concerns such as the contradiction that exists between profit-making and commercial confidentiality on the one hand, and democratic oversight and local control on the other (see wood 1995 for more on this tension). initiated in july 2004, ontario’s infrastructure planning, financing and procurement framework (ipfp) is similar to bc’s camf given that it outlines the strategies that will be used when developing (planning, building, financing and managing) new public infrastructure projects across the province. like the camf, the ipfp framework enshrines five key principles in the planning, financing, and approval of project proposals submitted by ministries, municipalities, and other public sector entities: the public interest is paramount, value for money must be demonstrated, appropriate public ownership/control must be preserved, accountability must be maintained, all processes must be fair, transparent, and efficient (ontario ministry of public infrastructure renewal [mpir], 2004, p.9). these are presented as a pragmatic, technocratic approach to infrastructure investment but there is an explicit emphasis on “innovative engagement of the private sector to leverage expertise and capital” (mpir, 2004, p.17); and p3s must be considered stabilizing privatization | 95 for all projects over $20 million. of the nine infrastructure and procurement models discussed in the ifpf, eight are p3s (mpir, 2004, p.21-22), and the public procurement option is only recommended for very minor investments (mpir, 2004, p.24). a risk-focus is present here too, as is an emphasis on value for money which incentivizes private financing and procurement. in 2003 dalton mcguinty, while campaigning for premier of ontario, vowed to scrap the province’s first p3 hospitals which had been recently initiated by his predecessor mike harris. however, not only did these particular deals go forward (although some renegotiation did take place), but attempts to depoliticize p3s were soon initiated when the newly elected mcguinty government rebranded them as ‘alternative financing and procurement’ (afp) projects. though improvements have been made when compared to how p3s were previously developed (e.g., see ontario auditor general, 2008), there is no specific legislation in place to ensure that ipfp principles are upheld and in practice afp projects are still p3s. both involve partnering with for-profit private consortia for the design, construction, financing, and operation of public infrastructure and support services. p3 industry insiders and advocates also confirm that they see no substantial difference between the p3 and afp models (e.g., see ontario standing committee on government agencies, 2008, p. 1530), as did the minister of health when initially presenting afp to the private sector (ccppp, 2005). an important feature of afp as it applies specifically to ontario’s health sector which is worth highlighting here is the 2006 decision by the ministry of health and long term care to exclude what they call ‘soft support services’ from future hospital deals (block, 2008, p.2). this means that p3 hospitals in ontario now involve only hard facility services such as maintenance, security, and operation of the physical plant but not care-related services like housekeeping, dietary, and laundry services. there is no such exemption in bc though some recent p3 hospital deals have excluded cleaning services. why exactly soft services were excluded in ontario is a multifaceted issue. the canadian union of public employees (cupe) and the ontario health coalition (ohc) claim that this was largely the result of a series of community-initiated plebiscites organized by the ohc which indicated overwhelming community support for the proposition that new hospital projects be kept fully public. a plebiscite in hamilton, for example, returned a vote of 98% in favour of this proposition (ohc, 2006). from a more cynical perspective, soft support services may have been exempted 96 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism from p3 hospital project agreements not due to community activism but instead because of the serious and ongoing problems that have resulted from their incorporation within early project agreements in that province (see ontario standing committee on public accounts, 2009, p.1340). it is therefore likely that this exemption serves two purposes: assuaging some public concerns whilst helping to make p3s run smoother in the future. by serving as both a concession offered to opponents and a pragmatic modification to the p3 model, overall this development has helped ensure the longevity of the p3 model in ontario’s public health care sector. there is also no guarantee that this exemption of soft services will be maintained in the future. new forms of institutional support new forms of institutional support for p3s are the backbone of the enabling field. the creation of specialized government agencies, or ‘p3 units’, best exemplifies this component. p3 units promote and evaluate these projects and act as repositories of knowledge which facilitates policy learning by building government expertise surrounding the complex bidding, negotiation, and operational phase of p3 projects (rachwalski and ross, 2010). the presence of these p3 units has been essential to the entrenchment of privatization within the public sector. the role of the p3 unit extends beyond the more prosaic activities outlined on their websites and in policy documents as they must translate global policy models and dispossession imperatives, ensuring that this unfolds in ways which meet local needs whilst simultaneously ensuring profitability for global investors. without the institutional support that p3 units provide, problems experienced with individual projects would not readily transform into a sophistication of the local p3 model but instead could easily lead to its abandonment. dispossession via p3s is relatively unique from other types of privatization since even though individual projects are locked in through multi-decade contracts, the model itself must be continually renewed through new projects and thus it contains a future-oriented component. this means that committed policy makers must take into consideration the long run implications of decisions made today. p3 units are currently the central way to ensure that this happens in bc and ontario. as jooste and scott (2012, p.150) put it: “the move toward private participation in infrastructure does not simply substitute private sector capacity for public sector capacity, it requires new forms of public sector capacity to be developed to overcome [p3] challenges” (emphasis added). stabilizing privatization | 97 the need for new forms of public sector capacity to facilitate dispossession was resolved in bc and ontario through the creation of crown corporations (in 2002 and 2006, respectively). this organizational form is significant given that in some countries greater political control is retained through the development of expertise and p3 unit-like roles within line departments (e.g., mission d’appui aux ppp in france and parapublica in portugal; see farrugia et al., 2008). the use of crown corporations, an arm’s length quasi-public organizational form, has a long history in canada and has been used for many different purposes ranging from economic development to cultural preservation (whiteside, 2012). yet something entirely new appears to have occurred in the past decade with p3 units: the use of crown corporations to facilitate dispossession. this occurs not through their sale but through their very existence – they are developed by the state to manage and encourage privatization in other areas of the public sector. thus the crown corporation is now being used to extend market-led restructuring in canada’s public sector. these crown corporations also help root market rules and norms within the public sector, and this is role appears to be expanding as their purview grows. with partnerships bc this expansion is both internal and external to the province. within the province, greater use of p3s means that partnerships bc has been gradually taking over the roles previously played by the bc building corporation (bcbc) (mckellar, 2006). created in 1977 to manage public sector real estate, land, and infrastructure, bcbc is thus being increasingly replaced with a commercialized crown corporation oriented toward privatization. further, as indicated in its 2011 annual report (partnerships bc, 2011), its future strategy includes diversifying its client base. this involves selling its expertise to other jurisdictions without p3 units and pushing the p3 model into new sectors within the province. the roles assigned to infrastructure ontario have also been greatly expanded over the years and it is now responsible for many different aspects of infrastructure and land development in the province: from large p3 infrastructure development and operation in 2005 to small infrastructure loans (offered to municipal borrowers only) in 2006 when it absorbed the ontario strategic infrastructure financing authority (osifa), and more recently in 2011 it took on the responsibilities of the ontario reality corporation (orc) (the manager of government owned and occupied land and buildings) (see infrastructure ontario, 2011). this has not only given infrastructure ontario a greater degree of permanence within the province but it also means that its p3-specific tasks are increasingly normalized within the day-to-day operations of government. 98 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism in order to assist jurisdictions without a p3 unit, in 2007 the federal government has also increased its commitment to p3s through the creation of ppp canada inc. as a way of promoting and assisting p3 development across the country (especially at the municipal level). once the p3 market deteriorated sharply with the financial crisis in 2008, ppp canada inc. also began to engage in ‘extensive discussions’ throughout 2008/9 with the provinces/territories, private sector stakeholders and other federal organizations to gauge the nature and extent of public sector support needed to ensure that new projects were started and that recently initiated projects reached financial close. through these efforts ppp canada determined its priority would be to help ease the “significant roadblock” to p3 projects posed by the financial crisis (ppp canada, 2009). in furtherance of its mandate to “develop the canadian market for public-private partnerships,” it has received funding commitments from the federal government of $2.8 billion per annum for 2011-2013 (ppp canada, 2009). ppp canada also teamed up with export development canada to provide surety, bonding support, and co-lending to enable troubled p3 projects to proceed (ibid). in contrast, fiscal austerity is making a comeback in most other areas of government. enabling field support cannot ultimately resolve all the problems associated with p3s but it does make them easier to implement, smoothes out and regularizes the process, and promotes privatization. and to the degree that some policy learning takes place then p3s may in fact perform slightly better – or at least appear to. the real significance of the enabling field is thus the way in which it creates a ‘common sense’ that permeates public sector processes and decision-making. this insulates the p3 model from crises through routinization, institutionalization, and depoliticization. routinization routinizing dispossession within the public sector involves the development and normalization of protocols which facilitate the selection of p3s. there are two important components here: the language of the enabling field (and an entrenchment of risk, derived through calculations of relatively short term costs and value for money, as the primary focus of decision-making) and the normalization of a market-based and market-reliant view of how the ‘public interest’ is to be conceptualized and upheld. this is accomplished not through grand overt offenses but instead through mundane, technocratic procedures. given the market-oriented nature of this form of decision-making, the language of the enabling field is part rhetoric and part reality. the rhetoric of public provision as being inherently riskier and of poorer value stabilizing privatization | 99 for money demonizes traditional projects and incentivizes privatization. for this reason p3 development remains a highly normative process as adherence to, and support for, logics of dispossession require a strong ideological commitment to privatization. however, even though the establishment of routines surrounding p3 selection may initially be normatively-based, once enabling fields are up and running normalization can proceed through its everyday routines. thus normalized and normative processes are not mutually exclusive. rhetoric is further transformed into reality when, as larner (2000, p.33) describes, discourse comes to constitute the institutions and practices of decision makers. after nearly a decade of developing most/many large infrastructure projects as p3s, and of placing an importance on particular conceptions of risk, the public interest, and value for money, the normative basis of the p3 option is shored up in ways that transcend narrow ideological dogma. self-referentiality also characterizes p3 policy as assumptions and biases are recirculated and used to justify future p3 selection. this is paradoxical given that p3s remain, on the face of it, superior only when judged against a public sector comparator (psc). yet since a psc is merely a hypothetical scenario and values alien to privatization policy (such as public provision in order to allow for collective decision-making and democratic accountability) are inherently penalized, the role of the psc is not actually that of engaging with alternatives to p3s – instead it is often a device used to mask these normative aspects through technocratic procedures. reinforcing this is the presumption that large infrastructure projects ought to be first considered as a p3. even when improvements are made to overcome past problems, p3 policy innovations (e.g., exempting some services, standardizing contracts and bidding procedures) involve moving the privatization agenda forward, not searching for public alternatives. institutionalization an important element in the shift to p3s as the new ‘traditional’ is the institutionalization of this model as the de facto standard way in which large infrastructure projects are delivered in bc and ontario (especially hospital projects). the term ‘institutionalization’ is used here to denote a number of different things. first, the root word – institution – should be taken to literally represent the creation of new public sector agencies (p3 units) which act as centres of expertise for p3 development protocols. another way to think of institutionalization is the way in which new ‘rules of the game’ are formalized through the enabling field and come to shape future decisions, connoting a new system of action and a reori100 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism entation of standards and decision-making.11 p3 units and new capital planning procedures tailored to privatization therefore lead to a change in the rules of the game, the norms of the public sector, and the social processes and actions repeated by decision-makers. an increasing permanence is also suggested by the use of the term institutionalization: these agencies and protocols are no longer expendable and temporary, but are indicative of a regulatory shift. as captured by selznick (1957, p.16-17), “institutionalization is a process… to ‘institutionalize’ is to infuse with value beyond the technical requirements of the task at hand”. when p3 development begins to shed its reliance upon external validation through reference to previous traditional methods, it begins to take on a life of its own (as the new ‘traditional’). institutionalization should therefore be conceptualized in process-based terms. in selznick’s (1957) description, institutionalization is something which happens to an organization over time but with the enabling field it is obvious that increasing permanence can also be sped up by state policy. in fact both evolution and entrenchment are visible with p3 units and the norms and procedures they embody and reproduce. this is not to say that processes relating to the evolution of the enabling field are unidirectional and heading ineluctably toward a situation where p3s are the hegemonic model for all public sector infrastructure projects. this category of institutionalization equally captures how different moments of p3 policy are crystallized (i.e., the ways in which challenges are dealt with, created, and absorbed). these challenges come from many directions: neutralizing and accommodating p3 opponents; making good on election promises (or at least appearing to – i.e., afp in ontario); dealing with the inherent problems and conflicts associated with privatization and economic crises; and adjusting to the tensions associated with marketized state restructuring. as larner (2000, p.20) suggests, “the emergence of new forms of political power does not simply involve the imposition of a new understanding on top of the old … [it] involves the complex linking of various domains of practice, is ongoingly contested, and the result is not a foregone conclusion”. in other words, p3 development and the ‘lock-in’ of the privatization model is not a foregone conclusion by any stretch; the argument being made here is that the whole purpose behind enabling fields and institutionalization is to provide for some semblance of permanency even though dispossession via p3s requires constant renewal and therefore ongoing political/ideo11 see burnham, 1999 on rules-based forms of state management and depoliticization. stabilizing privatization | 101 logical commitment. as mentioned above, efforts by cupe and the ohc to politicize p3 use in ontario’s public health care sector clearly stand out as an example of how effective, targeted resistance can lead to tangible changes in p3 policy. depoliticization depoliticizing privatization policy, or how dispossession now proceeds largely through technocratic decision-making rather than grand normative gestures, is another key implication of the p3 enabling fields in bc and ontario. peter burnham (2001, p.127) connects depoliticization to a particular governing strategy which “plac[es] at one remove the political character of decision-making”. this benefits state managers by redirecting blame and dampening expectations whilst still allowing them to retain control. more than merely rhetoric, depoliticization also relies on new bureaucratic practices and a shift from discretion-based to rules-based regimes in particular (burham, 2001, p.130-1). the routines of the new capital planning and procurement frameworks and p3 units correspond to this conceptualization. it is also suited to describing the p3 enabling field as it deals with the internal transformations that occur with state restructuring, and indicates that depoliticized decisionmaking remains simultaneously political in nature in addition to burnham’s (2001) version of depoliticization (which deals mainly with internal state restructuring) we must specifically add the privatization dimension. colin hay (2007, p.80-87) provides this in his description of three forms of depoliticization: when issues are demoted from the governmental to the public sphere, from the public sphere to the private sphere, and from the private sphere to the realm of necessity. depoliticization is therefore a process with many faces. changes that have occurred with p3s and the creation of enabling fields generally fall within the first two categories of depoliticization. most obviously it involves shifting decision-making from the public sphere into the profit-oriented private sphere. this moment captures the new authority and influence awarded to the private consortia representatives who now influence individual projects, and the private consultants, accountants, auditors which form the private technocracy that informs policy and evaluates projects. in addition, when issues are demoted from the governmental sphere to the public sphere it means that public infrastructure and service decisions are no longer primarily managed through the formal democratic arena (where decision-makers are accountable and public deliberation takes place), but instead are 102 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism shifted into the far less transparent realm of bureaucratic management (conducted by public or quasi-public agencies). this is the realm of the public technocracy and where officials become fairly insulated from public accountability (i.e., p3 units). like with routinization, depoliticization can become a reality in the sense that decisions are actually shifted into the private sphere, however it is also remains a powerful rhetorical tactic used by policy makers attempting to duck responsibility for, or reduce the visibility of, privatization. as ascoli and ranci (2002, p.14) suggest, marketization will always remain politicized since it “changes the direction in which [government] policies are developing” making it “an eminently political process, which redistributes rights and power, modifies policy networks and the institutional context in which [public] policy is made, and influences the ways in which welfare needs are defined.” furthermore, since public infrastructure delivered via a p3 remains a political responsibility (with the governmental sphere ultimately on the hook for funding, procuring, and broadly overseeing the operation of new public infrastructure and support services), this form of privatization cannot be truly depoliticized given that issues are never entirely demoted to the private sphere. conclusion routinizing, institutionalizing, and depoliticizing p3 development is an ongoing process, not a stationary state. it is increasingly ‘lockedin’ through various changes and innovations in the p3 enabling field. provincial enabling fields have become more sophisticated over time, leading to p3 project proliferation and the entrenchment of privatization particularly in the area of large infrastructure projects. since this process requires policy learning and p3 program evolution, elements of these p3 enabling fields in ontario and bc have been altered in response to market changes and community activism. however, so long as this involves changes made to how p3s proceed and not whether p3s proceed, adaptations have ultimately strengthened the model overall. nothing presented here should be taken to suggest that jurisdictions without enabling fields are not, or have not been, developing p3s. whether at the provincial or municipal level, most provinces in canada have developed at least one p3 in the past, although outside of bc and ontario these efforts have been far more sporadic. at the federal level there are also several operational p3s and the harper conservatives have implemented a p3 screen (federal funding through the building stabilizing privatization | 103 canada initiative is tied to the use of p3s) and a p3 unit (ppp canada). however, due to the constitutional division of powers, the sectors with projects most suitable for partnership agreements are mainly located within provincial jurisdiction (e.g., hospitals, schools, highways, water treatment facilities) which inherently limits the number of federal p3s. furthermore, the argument made here is not that enabling fields unequivocally force ministries and other public authorities to choose the p3 procurement model. mainly what enabling fields do, as the name would suggest, is enable p3s by simplifying processes, and encouraging, supporting and promoting their use. some items compel public authorities to consider p3s (i.e., camf and ipfp) but even these are mere frameworks which could be easily altered, transcended, or ignored if the political will to do so existed. instead it is the sheer bulk of the enabling field which acts as a form of soft lock-in by shifting the bias away from traditional public procurement. soft lock-in also helps depoliticize these activities just as p3s themselves depoliticize dispossession through technocratic decision-making. enabling fields also help p3s weather crises, whether the crisis is related to financial market volatility or a loss of faith in the model. we have recently seen this in action as routinizing and institutionalizing p3 adoption played an important role in helping to avert widespread p3 abandonment after the 2008/9 crisis. this has allowed the p3 model to retain its privileged policy position in ontario and bc, despite all of its drawbacks. changes in p3 markets and policy have nonetheless occurred over the past five years. it is likely that the global volume of annual p3 deals will not return to the heyday of 2002-7 given that this was an era of cheap credit and euphoric financialization (ccppp, 2009, p.1). concerns around debt refinancing have also led to the inclusion of clauses within ontario’s p3 hospital project agreements which stipulate that financial gains reaped through debt refinancing must now be shared with the relevant public hospital board (loxley, 2010, p.110). a reversal of some elements of privatization enabling legislation has also occurred. most notably, in 2007 the supreme court of canada sided with bc’s hospital employees union, and other health sector unions, in their fight against bc bill 29-2002 (the health and social services delivery improvement act) which unilaterally rescinded provisions in signed collective agreements and paved the way for unprecedented privatization of health care support staff in the province. this forced changes to similar unconstitutional provisions in p3-related legislation (bc bill 94-2003 the health sector 104 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism partnerships agreement act) as well. more recently, in 2011/12 the province of manitoba took an important step toward expanding protections for the public with its bill 34 (the public-private partnerships transparency and accountability act) which requires greater public consultation and involvement of officials such as the provincial auditor general and fairness monitors. these victories and initiatives help dampen the more deleterious effects of dispossession but they do not entirely counter it, nor do they root out the specific elements of privatization-driven state restructuring that have occurred over the past decade. a greater focus on p3 enabling fields would be useful for opponents as it helps to uncover the ways in which privatization by stealth proceeds through the support of even more obscure changes being made to public sector decision-making in some jurisdictions. resistance must therefore be not only directed at the outcomes of p3 use (i.e., dispossession) but also at the processes encouraging and supporting p3 selection (i.e., enabling fields). this includes politicizing the institutionalization, routinization and normalization of the market-based rationale that informs p3 policy and reorients public sector decision-making. stabilizing privatization | 105 references ascoli, u., & ranci, c. (2002). the context of new social policies in europe. in u. ascoli, & c. ranci (eds.), dilemmas of the welfare mix. ny: kluwer. ashman, s., & callinicos, a. (2006). capital accumulation and the state system. historical materialism, 14(4), 107-131. bc ministry of finance. (n.d). overview. capital asset management framework. http://www.fin.gov.bc.ca/tbs/camf_overview.pdf bc ministry of finance. (2002, may 30). new framework, agency to guide public building. news release. http://www2.news.gov.bc.ca/nrm_news_ releases/2002fin0001-000023.htm bc ministry of finance. (2008, november 7). province raises capital standard threshold for ppps. information bulletin. http://www2.news. gov.bc.ca/news_releases_2005-2009/2008fin0019-001677.htm block, s. (2008). from p3s to afp. ontario: canadian centre for policy alternatives. http://www.policyalternatives.ca/sites/default/files/ uploads/publications/ontario_office_pubs/2008/from_p3s_to_afps.pdf burnham, p. (1999). the politics of economic management in the 1990s. new political economy. 4(1), 37-54. burnham, p. (2001). new labour and the politics of depoliticization. british journal of politics & international relations, 3(2), 127-149. canadian council for public-private partnerships (ccppp). (2005). ontario infrastructure minister announces new infrastructure agency & financing method. for the record. http://www.pppcouncil.ca/pdf/ caplanftr2.pdf canadian council for public-private partnerships (ccppp). (2009). the impact of global credit retraction on the canadian ppp market. toronto: canadian council for public-private partnerships. http://www. pppcouncil.ca/pdf/credit_retraction_report_summer2009.pdf canadian union of public employees (cupe). (2003). exposing ppps. http:// cupe.ca/public-private-partnerships/exposingppps canadian union of public employees (cupe). (2009). quebec government backs away from p3s. http://cupe.ca/privatization-watch-june-09/ quebec-backs-away-from-p3s cohn, d. (2004). the public-private partnership “fetish”: moving beyond the rhetoric. revue gouvernance, 1(2), 2-24. cohn, d. (2008). british columbia’s capital asset management framework: moving from a transactional to transformative leadership on public-private partnerships, or a “railroad job”? canadian public administration, 51(1), 71-97. dimaggio, p.j., & powell, w.w. (1991). introduction. in w. w. powell, & p. j. dimaggio, (eds.) the new institutionalism in organizational analysis. chicago: university of chicago press. 106 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism drapak, f. (2009). how the financial crisis has changed the market for ppps. http://www.slideshare.net/filipdrapak/financial-crises-and-publicprivate-partnership-by-filip-drapak edwards, p., & shaoul, j. (2002). partnerships: for better, for worse? accounting, auditing & accountability journal, 16(3), 397-421. farrugia, c., reynolds, t., & orr, r. j. (2008). public-private partnership agencies: a global perspective. collaboratory for research on global projects, stanford university. working paper #39. http://crgp.stanford. edu/publications/working_papers/farrugia_etal_pppagencies_ wp0039.pdf fraser, i. (2009, april 19). john swinney slams pfi legacy. the sunday times. http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/economics/ article6122170.ece gaffney, d., pollock, a. m., price, d., & shaoul, j. (1999.) the private finance initiative. british medical journal, 319(7202), 48-51. grimsey, d., & lewis, m. k. (2004.) public private partnership. uk: edward elgar. harvey, d. (2003). the new imperialism. oxford: oxford university press. hay, c. (2007). why we hate politics. cambridge: polity press. hodge, g. (2004). risks in public-private partnerships: shifting, sharing or shirking? asia pacific journal of public administration, 26(2), 155-179. hodge, g., & greve, c. (eds). (2005). the challenge of public-private partnerships: learning from international experience. uk: edward elgar. hunter, j. (2009, january 29). province takes on larger share of toll-bridge project. globe and mail, p. s1. infrastructure ontario. (n.d.) projects. http://www.infrastructureontario.ca/ templates/projects.aspx?id=36 infrastructure ontario. (2011). 2010-2011 annual report. http:// www.infrastructureontario.ca/workarea/downloadasset. aspx?id=2147488402 jooste, s. f., & scott, w. r. (2012). the public-private partnership enabling field: evidence from three cases. administration & society, 44(2), 149182. larner, w. (2000). neoliberalism: policy, ideology, governmentality. studies in political economy, 63, 5-25. linder, s.h. (1999). coming to terms with the public-private partnership. american behavioral scientist, 43(1), 35-51. loxley, j. (2010). public service, private profits. black point: fernwood. loxley, j. (2012). public-private partnerships after the global financial crisis: ideology trumping economic reality. studies in political economy. 89, 7-37. stabilizing privatization | 107 mackenzie, h. (2007). doing the math: why p3’s for alberta schools don’t add up. alberta: canadian union of public employees. http://cupe.ca/updir/ cupe_alberta_doing_the_math.pdf mackenzie, h. (2009). bad before, worse now. ontario: hugh mackenzie and associates. http://www.cupe.bc.ca/sites/default/files/bad%20before%20 worse%20now%20_final_%20_2_.pdf mckee, m., edwards, n., & atun, r. (2006). public-private partnerships for hospitals. bulletin of the world health organization, 84(11), 890-896. mckellar, j. (2006). alternative delivery models: the special purpose corporation in canada. in o. kaganova, & j. mckellar (eds.), managing government property assets: international experiences. washington, d.c.: the urban institute press. mehra, n. (2005). flawed, failed, abandoned. ontario: ontario health coalition. http://cupe.ca/updir/flawed.failed.abandoned.p3s.pdf north, d. c. (1990). institutions, institutional change and economic performance. cambridge: cambridge university press. ontario auditor general. (2008). brampton civic hospital public-private partnership project. 2008 annual report of the auditor general of ontario. http://www.auditor.on.ca/en/reports_en/en08/303en08.pdf ontario health coalition. (2006, march 27). hamilton joins more 50,000 ontarians in saying no to privatized p3 hospitals. http://www.web. net/~ohc/hamiltons/march272006hamiltonrelease.pdf ontario ministry of public infrastructure renewal (mpir). (2004). building a better tomorrow: infrastructure planning, financing and procurement framework for ontario’s pubic sector. ontario: queen’s printer. ontario standing committee on government agencies. (2008, september 17). agency review: ontario infrastructure project corp. (infrastructure ontario). hansard committee transcripts. http://www.ontla. on.ca/web/committee-proceedings/committee_transcripts_details. do?locale=en&date=2008-09-17&parlcommid=8859&billid=&business =agency+review%3a+ontario+infrastructure+projects+corp.+%28infr astructure+ontario%29&documentid=23205 ontario standing committee on public accounts. (2009, march 25). 2008 annual report, auditor general: ministry of energy and infrastructure, ministry of health and long-term care. hansard committee transcripts. http://www.ontla.on.ca/web/committee-proceedings/ committee_transcripts_details.do?locale=en&date=2009-03-25&par lcommid=8861&billid=&business=2008+annual+report%2c+au ditor+general%3a++ministry+of+energy+and+infrastructure%2c++ministry+of+health+and+long-term+care&documentid=23744 partnerships bc. (n.d.) projects. http://www.partnershipsbc.ca/files/ projects.html 108 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism partnerships bc. (2005). project report: achieving value for money. abbotsford regional hospital and cancer centre project. victoria: partnerships bc. http:// www.partnershipsbc.ca/files_2/documents/020705_pbcabbotsford.pdf partnerships bc. (2011). 2010/2011 annual report. victoria: partnerships bc. http://www.partnershipsbc.ca/files/documents/pbc-annualreport15jun2011.pdf ppp canada. (2009). annual report 2008-2009. ottawa: ppp canada. www. p3canada.ca/_files/file/ppp-annual-report_en.pdf rachwalski, m. d., & ross, t. (2010). running a government’s p3 program: special purpose agency or line departments? journal of comparative policy analysis, 12(3), 275-298. scott, w. r. (1995). institutions and organizations. london: sage. selznick, p. (1957). leadership in administration. ny: harper & row. spronk, s. (2010). water and sanitation utilities in the global south: re-centering the debate on “efficiency”. review of radical political economics, 42(2), 156-174. tett, g. (2007, november 16). how monoline market works. financial times. http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/4465d6c8-93e5-11dc-acd00000779fd2ac.html#axzz1v8mvqfao vining, a. r., & boardman, a. e. (2008). public-private partnerships in canada: theory and evidence. canadian public administration. 51(1), 9-44. whiteside, h. (2012). crises of capital and the logic of dispossession and repossession. studies in political economy, 89, 59-78. whiteside, h. (forthcoming 2013). tarnished yet tenacious: examining the track record and future of public-private partnership hospitals in canada. in y. atasoy (ed.), global economic crisis and the politics of diversity. london & new york: palgrave macmillan. wood, e. m. (1995). democracy against capitalism: renewing historical materialism. cambridge: cambridge university press. 978-1-926958-01-9 159 reviews book review about canada: animal rights, by john sorenson. black point, nova scotia and winnipeg, manitoba: fernwood publishing company limited, 2010. $17.95 can, paper. isbn: 978-1-55266-356-1. pages: 1-192. reviewed by priscillia lefebvre1 about canada: animal rights is one in a series of books that critically examines vital issues pertaining to social justice, healthcare, and public services in canadian society. john sorenson delivers an extensive analysis of animal rights in canada, which is both extremely disturbing and informative. in his exploration of this important and controversial topic, sorenson provides us with numerous examples of the exploitation and abuse of animals within industry, as well as the sad shortcomings of canadian legislation intended to regulate it. he explains the issue of animal rights in a comprehensive and yet extremely accessible way. because of its broad nature, sorenson does not delve into an exhaustive analysis of any one topic but provides the reader with an excellent overview of the legal, historical, and social issues surrounding animal rights in canada as well as the arguments, misconceptions, and industry propaganda embedded within it. sorenson begins with a discussion of animal rights within the broader social justice movement by remarking that all too often animal rights are disregarded by many otherwise progressive people as a legitimate concern. for many, he explains, animal rights are considered inferior to the widely accepted notion of the hierarchical order of nature in which human beings dominate and take priority over concerns of other species. labeled as pretentious or sentimental, animal rights issues are placed at odds with other struggles instead of being considered central to many sites 1 priscillia lefebvre is a ph.d candidate in the department of sociology & anthropology with a concentration in political economy. she can be reached at plefebvr@connect.carleton.ca about canada: animal rights 160 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research of oppression. sorenson takes issue with this by stating that to view a compassion for the suffering of animals as somehow indicative of a disregard for the suffering of humans is nonsensical and creates a false dichotomy between the two, as if systemic violence towards animals and the environment does not also include an attack on human labour and health under patriarchal capitalism. animal rights activists, to a great extent, are also accused of extremism and called terrorists, mainly pointing to groups such as the animal liberation front, by those who would defend animal exploitation and cruelty under the present system. sorenson likens this socially constructed bifurcation to racism and sexism, ideologies which have been historically used to justify the oppression of marginalized others. sorenson readies his audience for this discussion with the following passage (p.11): capitalism involves exploitation of animals as well as humans and the profit-motive extends suffering to a broader scale: billions of animals are killed each year in the food, vivisection, fashion, hunting, and entertainment industries. mistreatment of animals is shaped by systems of oppression that developed over time to maintain profit, privilege and power. sorenson’s abolitionist perspective is based first and foremost on the premise, outlined by gary francione, that animals are to be recognized as having one basic right—the right not to be considered property. all animals are sentient beings who deserve respect and are not to be seen as at the disposal of humans, and for this he makes no apologies. sorenson maintains that the commodification of animals enables their usage by humans to attain whatever ends deemed fit by the owner, be it for profit, labour, experimentation or otherwise. he details accounts of the gruesome activities taking place in industrial meat production, factory farming, and in the slaughter of cows, pigs, chickens as well as the production of more so-called upscale delicacies such as duck foie gras, marine animals, and exotic meats. he explores animals being tortured and abused for entertainment purposes and sport such as in hunting, rodeos, horse-racing, circuses, and zoos. sorenson also speaks of the ugliness of the pet industry in his examples of puppy mills, as well as cases of extreme animal cruelty on the part of pet owners and individuals. he also refers to and provides examples of the redundancy and ineffectualness of animal research in canada. although reading numerous accounts of violence and excruciating pain being inflicted on animals does not make for an enjoyable read per se, it is an important one for those willing to confront the truly horrible production methods of what we, as a society, consume on a daily basis. sorenson reestablishes the links between animal and human suffering through a survey of the detrimental role that animal exploitation and the killing of animals for profit plays in capitalist colonial expansion. he argues that animal rights issues 161 must be integrated as part of the greater ecological and economic crisis by interrogating the animal industry’s contribution to serious threats to human survival such as global warming and starvation. corporate interests will never allow for animal rights as that would interfere with their profits. to combat this, corporations have invested millions of dollars, a significant portion of which comes from taxpayers awarded through government subsidies, in public relations propaganda. for example, sorenson outlines the opportunistic use of indigenous people by the fur industry as marketing tools to promote themselves as preserving canada’s rich cultural heritage and supporting traditional ways of living by paying aboriginal fur-trappers next to nothing for the bloody work of killing animals. many would say this relationship is far more representative of canada’s tradition of colonization and genocide of indigenous people than it is of respecting or preserving aboriginal culture. lending to the strength of his arguments, particularly when speaking of canada’s indefensible seal hunt, he also lays out the irrationality of much of the animal industry’s practices not only in moral, but economic terms. in doing so, he calls into question the sustainability of such practices and explores who really profits from them. in most cases, such as the seal hunt, it is fur industry corporations who lobby the federal government’s department of fisheries and oceans to continue defending the mass killing of seals under the guise of job creation for off-season fishermen and animal population control, even in the face of embarrassing international public anger and costly boycotts. ironically, this also follows the same orwellian logic that conservation through culling initiatives propagate in that in order to preserve animals we must kill them. sorenson also points out that, in reality, these brutal annual practices only account for a tiny fraction of income for labourers, while producing hazardous consequences for the ocean’s ecosystem and costing governments several times more money to orchestrate than it generates. in fact, one gets the impression that it would be cheaper to cancel the hunt altogether and just give sealers the money they make during this mass killing outright. as the fur market declines, it would seem that the seal hunt, referred to by many as ‘canada’s shame,’ is only lucrative for the commercial fur industry. in the final chapter, sorenson presents veganism as the only ethical choice when facing an industry bent on such cruelty and total disregard for the wellbeing of both animals and humans; an industry inflicting countless long-term harms on the environment in search of profit. however, his call for veganism as a (at least partial) solution fails in part due to the lack of addressing the shortcomings of following a vegan lifestyle without examining other forms of exploitation that, on its own, veganism does not address. problems surrounding grain production and other foods under capitalist industrial agriculture that are not animal based, for example. about canada: animal rights 162 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research where does veganism situate itself, in the resistance of not only animal exploitation but human exploitation as well, in the import of fruits and other foods from countries such as the philippines and costa rica grown under extremely oppressive, dangerous, and environmentally harmful conditions, not to mention the use of migrant labour in canada’s own fruit and vegetable production? sorenson’s call for veganism would have been much stronger had he clarified this point. nor does sorenson problematize his call for eco-tourism as an alternative to safari-style vacationing as a colonial practice in itself which often requires the appropriation and ‘clearing’ of land already in use by indigenous people in order to prepare it for viewing as a pristine wilderness. in my opinion, these are vital topics for discussion if we are not to simply trade one oppression for another in an attempt to, as sorenson himself would say, “salve our consciences.” that said, about canada: animal rights provides an excellent overview of this issue, as well as its far-reaching implications and vital place within the broader movement for social justice for all. whole book pdf 978-1-926958-01-9 175 book review canada’s 1960s: the ironies of identity in a rebellious era by bryan d. palmer. toronto: university of toronto press, 2008. $35.00 us, paper. isbn 978-08020-9954-9. pages: 1-605. reviewed by edward hilchey1 curious about ‘what it is to be canadian’? if so, you are not alone. grounding this question of identity in history, bryan palmer theorises that the turbulence of the 1960s played a significant role in the destabilization of established notions of canadian identity. re-evaluating the personalities and movements of the 1960s, palmer argues that the 60s push towards an equitable society acted as a catalyst for questioning canada’s historic british identity. however, these movements did not provide any long lasting certainty over what canada’s national identity should entail. palmer’s style of writing quietly and gently guides us into his perception of canada’s experience of the 1960s. layering his work topically, palmer demonstrates himself to be as much of a cultural as he is a labour historian. well-supported with 143 pages of notes, he adds a humanistic depth to this work through a series of anecdotes from newspapers, poems, activist manifestos and other lesser known works. through the effective use of these resources with broader themes and debates, palmer critically engages the developments of the 1960s. palmer connects a range of events which emerged in the 1960s through creative and concise language, blending the transformation of this social and political climate. the choice to examine canada during the 1960s for palmer lies precisely in its overt activism. the 60s were marred with patterns of hostility demarcating regional, political, cultural, and linguistic disparities. through a marxist definition of irony (drawn from terry eagleton), palmer comments that “capitalism is that of a system 1 edward hilchey is an m.a. candidate at carleton university. he can be reached at ehilchey@connect.carleton.ca canada’s 1960s: the ironies of identity in a rebellious era 176 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research frozen in its fixed modes of representation, yet mobilizing a desire to overturn all representation; which gives birth to a great carnival of difference... which constantly conjures material inequality out of abstract equality; which is in need of an authority it continually flouts” (p. 9). the post-world war image of canada was that of a white european colony emerging to become a state. the irony was that canada was on the verge of confronting its own self image. in a renewed analysis, palmer counters the notion that canada’s 1960s was sui generis, that is, a spent generation whose objectives were not obtained (p. 5), and argues that this particular period was characterized with widespread changes in canada. palmer sets the stage by contextualizing events within the broader history affecting canada in the post-war era. part 1 begins with the fluctuation of the canadian dollar and its subsequent inflation in the early 60s. reflecting on the unstable dollar as an indicator of political and economic ineffectiveness, political blunderings became the backdrop to express (and subsequently elect) needed change in canada. these episodes quashed canada’s image as one of british dominion, settled by a robust and progressive populace. as well, it severed many historical economic ties with britain by shifting economic focus to the rise of the imperialist united states. in part 2, palmer tracks the international attention being afforded to canada through a variety of publicized events and scandals. emphasizing the role of electronic media in broadcasting and journalism, canadians became fascinated with sex scandals and political wrangling. from the munsinger affair wherein a displaced women from world war ii came to media attention due to her personal relationships with prominent conservative figures, to the acceptance of the ali-chuvolo fight where an underdog boxer survived fifteen rounds with the ‘louisville lip”. the way canadians perceived sexuality and white-ness was being transformed, paving the way for trudeau mania. canadians found themselves elated by the international recognition these events received, though these events flew in the face of victorian values and conventions. in parts 3 & 4, he mentions that the politicization of youth and striking workers lead to the opening of canada’s political organizations for debate. with airwaves and television screens saturated with nationalistic fervour, the unruly, reactive, and openly rebellious youth had moved from the margins of social transformation (paralleling labour) into “the very core of a decade’s understanding of social-political meaning” (p. 209). youth were rejecting integration into family and nation, as represented in the victoria day disturbances. street youth hostility shifted towards the development of subsequent banners of new left radicalism, revolutionary strife in quebec and indian red power. alternative identities awoke and broadcasted their displeasure with british canada. they drew their ideals, strength and support from the pantheon of marginal groups which were reinventing and redefining themselves. 177 the conclusion ends with the vanguard of british canada gathering with the world in montreal’s expo 67, celebrating canada’s arrival into the modern era. with the replacement of the red ensign for the maple leaf and an army of rcmp keeping the protestors and the flq at bay, canadian identity would remain precarious. yet, expo 67 and the maple leaf flag would be as unsuccessful at charting a unified path for canada as the victoria day celebrations and bank of canada issued currency before it. palmer’s remarks in the introduction are epitomized in this final section in which canadians “finally extricated themselves from a national identity... [that] so many voices had come to proclaim outmoded” (24). palmers understanding and application of historical materialism places increased emphasis on content and examples as compared to theoretical debate (five pages in the introduction are devoted to eagleson & his theoretical perspective). choosing to elaborate the historical antagonism bred from exploitation and struggle within canada, as seen in the dearth of detail, he presents an interpretive history of canada during the 60s, refocusing the period as a topic worthy of analytical spotlight. palmer uses this work to ‘suggest’ (p. 21) the reasons why the past happened as it did, and how the outcome of these events maintained a destabilized canadian identity. his analytical approach focuses on how the conflicting ideas were critically important to history. palmer concludes that the dominate relations of class conflict may be seen in the struggle over canadian identity, an identity which required significant consideration of how gender, race, empire and imperialism, social movements and identity interplay. the significance of this book lies within its reminder to scholars that the struggles of the 1960s have not completely died, and that this period has made a lasting contribution to canadian society. the intent is for others to understand the significant impact that 1960s & 70s politics and activism had in the uprooting of victorian canada. this book was written for both those who were present during the 60s and those who are interested in the implications of views from this period in canada. palmer asserts that what he offers through his work is “not so much a synthesis of the 60s, as suggestion on what destabilized the canadian identity, rooted in some specifics” (21). the point becomes clear that everything has a history; that before trudeau, we needed munsinger; that before red power or the flq, we needed ‘white niggers of america’ and hooliganism; that the transition of the canadian identity could only occur while being rooted in these events. reinforcing the point that canadians have accepted an undetermined identity rather than one passed down from establishment, this book reopens the tumultuous period which was the 1960s for further analysis. canada’s 1960s: the ironies of identity in a rebellious era 178 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research whole book pdf alternate routes science as capitalist ideology: the sociology of max weber reconsidered randle w. nelsen abstract max weber's sociology is viewed within the conteat of the changing socio-economic arrangements of his time. in attempting to develop a value-neutral sociology by creating a superhuman sociologist, weber in fact creates the persistent capitalistic valuebias of a sociology which reproduces the major characteristics of socio-economic reforms initiated by bismarck and his immediate successors. this bias makes capitalism interchangeable with bureaucracy, and the crucial "social-political problem" becomes the development of independent political leadership rather than the unequal distribution of profits among socio-economic classes. as with his super scientist, weber creates as problem-solver a super agent of change, the charismatic political leader, whose charisma becomes routinized to help ensure the continued capitalistic domination which weber's sociology supports. introduction max weber's sociology, in order to be most fully understood, should be viewed within the context of the changing socio-economic arrangements of his time. in germany, as in the united states, the transition from laissez faire to corporate capitalism contributed to, and was accomplished during, a period (c. 1865-1900) of severe 34 capitalist ideology economic disturbances (engels 1887-88; williams 1966). l the task of bringing stability to the german economy during the last third of the nineteenth century became in large part the responsibility of one man — germany's most charismatic leader prior to adolph hitler, chancellor otto von bismarck. this paper argues that the sociology developed by weber can be linked to the socio-economic reforms initiated by bismarck and his successors -reforms which were, like weber's sociology, favorable to the development of capitalism in its new corporate form. bismarck's reforms joined the interests of the more liberal professional and middle classes into which weber was born and the more conservative upper-class junkers with the interests of german workers. he promised direct universal vote in the election of parliament and worker security with a government-sponsored insurance program. he also endorsed and protected limited incorporation and trade combinations. the combined effect of these reforms was to provide bureaucratic support for an emerging corporate capitalism made synonymous with allegiance to the fatherland --a combination of factors that constitutes the central focus of weber's scientific sociology. 4 ironically, in his attempt to eliminate value bias by creating a superhuman sociologist capable of separating scientist from citizen (political) self, weber in fact creates the persistent capitalistic value bias that characterizes his sociology. in attempting to neutralize his analysis by maintaining a distinction between the 35 alternate routes socio-economic policy of politics and the objective requirements of science, weber attempts to provide scientific respectability for a sociology harmonious with, and subservient to, the new corporate arrangements of bismarck's nationalistic capitalism. specifically, weber's science serves as an attempt to legitimize capitalism because it makes bureaucracy as a form of social organization equivalent to, and interchangeable with, the existent division of labor produced by modern capitalism (giddens 1972). thus, through a process of substitution, bureaucracy rather than capitalism, the development of independent political leadership rather than the fact that one class profits by the labor of another, becomes the central problem of the german socio-economic order (see cohen 1972 and wright 1974-75) scientist weber provides citizen weber with a solution to this problem, the leader with charisma. however, in the final analysis, even this agent of change -the charismatic political leader -attempts to provide individualistic opposition to the status quo by working from within bureaucracy/capitalism, cooperating with the privileged social strata in cooling (routinizing) charisma. weber's faith in the charisma of a super change agent -the logical extension of, and counterpart to, his super scientist -is transformed into a faith in prevailing socio-economic arrangements. in brief, the salvation urged by weber's sociology helps ensure the continuation of capitalistic domination. 36 ' capitalist ideology bismarck, the junkers, and weber: an emphasis upon administrative efficiency bismarck created governmental policy without bothering to consult the great majority of the governed; he simply made decisions for them. the german tradition had long supported leadership of this type. in his summary of the germans' "war of liberation" against napoleon in 1813, a. j. p. taylor refers to this legacy of executive rule: . . . thus germany passively endured the war of liberation, just as previously it had endured conquest by the french and before that the balance of the system of westphalia. the allies defeated the french, but they could not undo the effects of french rule; and they had to devise a new system for germany which would serve the interests of europe, as previously the napoleonic system had served the interests of france. the people of germany were not consulted. they could not be consulted. as a political force they did not exist. [taylor 1945, p. 46] fifty years later bismarck was engaged in developing an increasingly self-serving power with which he could make sure that most germans still "did not exist" as a political force -a power that was soon to make him, as imperial chancellor, the chief administrator of his "new system for germany." during bismarck's rule weber, born in 1864, was maturing as a liberal intellectual. weber's father, who came from a financially secure family of textile manufacturers in western germany, was a successful lawyer and national-liberal parliamentarian; his mother, "a woman of culture and piety whose humanitarian and religious interests were not shared by her husband" (bendix 1962, p. 1). what weber's parents did share was their active involvement in attempting 37 alternate routes to increase the political influence of a declining liberalism. their house served, for the first twenty-nine years of weber's life, as a meeting place for the coalition of prominent politicians and professors from the university of berlin responsible for developing liberal opinion -that opinion which was so easily dominated by the autocratic rule of bismarck. this domination was made possible by skillful administration of a tariff system that restored the financial security of prussia's aristocratic landowners, the junkers. bismarck's administrative skill permitted him to develop what appeared to be a policy of national unity, while in actuality he was fashioning an economic reality in accordance with his now-famous statement to one of the liberals in 1848: "i am a junker and mean to benefit by it." the junkers were somewhat unique as an aristocratic class of landholders in east prussia. in contrast with the landowners of western europe, they were not a leisured class (see shuster and bergstraesser 1944, pp. 58-59). as owners of colonial lands they worked their estates themselves, without tenants: . . . the junker estates were never feudal; they were capitalist undertakings, which closely resembled the great capitalist farms of the american prairie -also the result of a colonial expropriation of the american indians. the junkers were hardworking estate managers, thinking of their estates solely in terms of profits and efficiency, neither more nor less than agrarian capitalists. [taylor 1945, pp. 28-29] in brief, the prussian junkers were "too poor to afford the aristocratic luxury of unbalanced accounts; and they brought to the 38 capitalist ideology affairs of state the same competence as was demanded on their own estates" (taylor 1945, pp. 60-61). thus, it is not surprising that the prussian tariff of 1818, which gave at least moderate protection to the junkers, marked the beginning of the first tariff system in all of europe. to return to the description of the junkers offered by taylor (1945, p. 61), "it was their application at the office desk which kept them afloat" as europe's most durable, hereditary governing class. the junker emphasis on administrative efficiency was the distinguishing characteristic of the professional and intellectual middle classes into which weber was born. it was these classes that still dominated the relatively small towns of germany in 1848, the year the german masses revolted against the military monarchies in vienna and berlin. these uprisings, the response of the unemployed to germany's first general economic crisis in winter 1847-48, led to a centralizing of power and the calling of a national assembly at frankfort. the work of this assembly revealed and strengthened the administrative tie that permitted the liberal, middle-class professionals to unite with the more conservative, upper-class junkers to dominate the german masses. the bonds of this liberal union -a union to which weber was later to lend scientific legitimation in his writings on social science methodology and bureaucracy -were cemented by force. the frankfort liberals, lawyers and professors, wanted to create a united germany by consent. however, as the class analysis of karl 39 alternate routes marx (1851-52, especially p. 71) clearly shows, they were frightened of the "disorder" being created by the revolutionary masses; consequently and paradoxically, the liberals increased their own vulnerability to the decisive power of the armed state by turning away from politics of consent to support the repressive activities of the armed forces as being essential to their cause of national security. as a commissioned officer, weber also considered the armed forces essential to this cause. his reliance on persuasion by force was made clear in a speech delivered to the 1907 congress of the verein fur sozialpolitik . speaking of the future of the social democratic party weber issues this warning: ... if the party seeks political power and yet fails to control the one effective means of power, military power , in order to overthrow the state, its dominance in the community and in public corporations and associations would only show its political impotence more distinctly, and the more it thought to rule simply as a political party and not objectively , the sooner it would be discredited. [mayer 1955, p. 65] weber's year of military training in 1883-84 had turned his initial condemnation into objective admiration of the requirements of military discipline. converted by his training experience to believe that the body works more precisely when all thinking is eliminated, weber apparently found considerable appeal in this partitioned view of men; taking leave from his university studies, he returned to strassburg for summer exercises in 1885 and again in •87, and participated in more military maneuvers a year later in posen (see gerth and mills 1946, p. 8). some twenty-five years 40 capitalist ideology later he was anxious to march at the head of his company in a world war about which he said: "in spite of all," it was " a great and wonderful war" (gerth and mills 1946, p. 22). while his health would not permit his participation as a leader of a company, he did serve from august 1914 to the fall of 1915 as a disciplinary and economic officer in charge of operating nine hospitals in the heidelberg area. with the peace of 1918, weber called upon "the designated war criminals" among germany's political leaders to offer their heads to the enemy as compensation for the mistakes they had made in conducting the war. his hope was that this offering would restore prestige to the german officer corps he so dearly loved -a love clearly shown in this answer to a favorite student's question concerning his post-war political plans: "i have no political plans except to concentrate all my intellectual strength on the one problem, how to get once more for germany a great general staff" (mayer 1955, p. 107). weber's emphasis on the importance of developing this general staff supported the cause of the liberals, which was also that of the junkers -namely, the protection of the capitalistic socioeconomic arrangements by which they were profiting. thus, the frankfort assembly's answer to the riots of the unemployed in the cities, and the more widespread general uprisings which followed, was a government without power to change existent socio-economic conditions. the central power legitimized by the frankfort assembly, 41 alternate routes referred to by marx (1851-52, p. 56) as "the parliament of an imaginary country," gave every appearance of having all the qualities of government; however, the imperial constitution creating this government was "a mere sheet of paper, with no power to back its provisions" (marx 1851-52, p. 114): ... as to the legal force of the decrees of the assembly, that point was never recognized by the larger governments, nor enforced by the assembly itself; it therefore remained in suspense. thus we had the strange spectacle of an assembly pretending to be the only legal representative of a great and sovereign nation, and yet never possessing either the will or the force to make its claims recognized. . . . thus the pretended new central authority of germany left everything as it had found it. [marx 1851-52, p. 54] when bismarck became the central power he, like the frankfort liberals of 1848, created a hollow government. however, it was a hollowness of a different kind in that it stemmed not from a lack of centralized power, but rather, precisely the opposite condition -that is, bismarck's administrative ability to efficiently consolidate and concentrate power which flowed from his own position as imperial chancellor. bismarck's socio-econoraic reforms: the administration of corporate economic unity the government fashioned by bismarck provided an illusion of power widely-dispersed. it was based on bismarck's 1866 proposal to establish a german parliament elected by direct universal vote, the junkers, perhaps the weakest and most reactionary group in 42 capitalist ideology germany at that time, were forced to accept this proposal in order that they might appear to be aligned with policy that was both powerful and progressive; thus, they were placed in a "ruling" position by bismarck while at the same time, they were being made accountable to him. so too were both the professionals and merchants of the middle classes and the working class who endorsed the proposal and accepted junker rule; the former were promised continued prosperity through the reinforcement of ties that strengthened their bond with the junkers, while the latter was convinced that the vote would bring social security. "the only loss was freedom, and that is not an item which appears in a balance sheet or in a list of trade union benefits" (taylor 1945, p. 108). 9 freedom to the liberals of the middle classes became transformed, under junker rule, from a desire for "liberal government" into a wish for "liberal administration." thus, the administrative talent of the prussian general staff that directed the war of 1870, became, under bismarck's direction, ever more efficient at achieving liberal demands without relinquishing power. as with the parliamentary proposal of 1866, bismarck initiated reforms designed to maintain the reality of his autocratic rule by retaining the image or appearance of pluralism. this was accomplished, as the following description makes clear, by encouraging development of the corporate capitalism upon which the liberal-junker alliance was based. the bismarckian order of 1871 had a simple pattern: junker prussia and middle-class germany, the coalition which sprang from the 43 alternate routes victories of 1866 . . . between 1867 and 1879 the german liberals achieved every liberal demand except power: ;ind in germany the demand for power had never bulked large in the liberal programme. never have liberal reforms been crowded into so short a period. . . . germany was given at a stroke uniform legal procedure, uniform coinage, uniformity of administration; all restrictions on freedom of enterprise and freedom of movement were removed, limited companies and trade combinations allowed. it is not surprising that in face of such a revolution the liberals did not challenge bismarck's possession of power: he was carrying out their programme far more rapidly than they could ever execute it themselves. [taylor 1945, pp. 122-123] endorsing limited incorporation and trade combinations, bismarck tied his own position of power and the security of the liberals' middle-class status position ever more closely to the development of capitalism in its new corporate form. thus, the end of the free trade era -heralded by the 1873 financial panic which marked the beginning of severe depression in germany and the rest of europe, and in the united states as well -was met by bismarck's policy favoring development of the kartells that fixed prices and regulated production during the 1880s. while the liberals received governmental support for industrial consolidation, the new capitalism required bismarck -somewhat against his will, because it was a step towards the greater germany he was resisting *" _-to further stabilize emerging socio-economic arrangements by implementing a policy that would protect the junker position. the moderate tariff of 1879, and the much higher tariffs of the 1880s, lessened the possibility that the newly-built railways of russia and the american continent could provide enough cheap grain to destroy german agriculture. in brief, 44 capitalist ideology it was a policy that not only made secure the junker position, but it also created allegiance to bismarck on the part of small farmers in east prussia; they, much more than the junker managers of large estates, needed protection. this protection, the method by which bismarck retained and strengthened his control over the liberals, junkers, and small farmers, was soon extended to the working class -the wage laborers. in exchange for their liberty -their freedom to oppose bismarck -between 1883 and 1889 he established for german workers a compulsory insurance program against sickness, accident, and old age. this program of social security was yet another indication of bismarck's administrative genius; not only did he manage to organize worker security at no expense to the state -it was subsidized for the state by employers and the workers themselves -but he also used the good will engendered by the program to collaborate with his rivals and eventual successors, the social democrats (see roth 1963, especially pp. 212-248). bismarck's administrative legacy : the bethmann conscience and weber's sociology the new chancellor of 1890, general leo von caprivi, carried on the bismarck tradition by giving empha; is to efficient organization and administration. while caprivi 's integrity was incorruptible, he was also politically inexperienced. his government, often ignoring the fact that power remained centralized in relatively few hands, 45 alternate routes was barely able to avert several potential economic crises -the army law renewal of 1893 is probably the most well-known example -by administering at least temporary unity among the various socioeconomic classes. caprivi's successors, prince chlodwig hohenlohe and then prince bemhard von bu'low, placed even more emphasis upon, and were considerably less discreet about, creating economic unity. bulow's germany of 1900 was searching for "world policy" that would provide an outlet for the overproduction of a rapidly maturing industrial capitalism; and the chief accomplishment of bulow's administration was that his minister of finance, johannes von miquel -a frequent guest in weber's parents' house -quite simply was able to buy, with the high tariff of 1902, the support of the prussian junkers for the reich. bulow's successor in 1909, theobald von bethmann-hollweg, was, even more markedly than bismarck and his other predecessors, an administrator. the descendent of a frankfort family that had for generations supplied the state with bureaucrats, bethmann became a civil servant who exemplified the "objective" bureaucrat-statesman that weber's sociology idealized. thus, while bethmann has been described by taylor (1945, p. 160) as "cultured, sympathetic, honest, he ran over with good intentions," it was his administration that most truly fulfilled bismarck's "blood and iron" promise of 1862 by leading germany into world war one and military rule. . . . all he lacked was any sense of power; and so it came about that this 'great gentleman' became, through his very irresponsibility, 46 capitalist ideology responsible for the agadir crisis, for the military violence at saverne, for the violation of belgian neutrality, for the deportation of conquered peoples, and for the campaign of unrestricted submarine warfare -crimes a good deal beyond bismarck's record, all extremely distasteful to bethmann, but all shouldered by his inexhaustible civil servant's conscience. it was useless, one night say dishonest, for him to have a high character: his sin was to belong to a class which had failed in its historic task and had become the blind instrument of power which it could not itself master. bismarck had said in 1867: 'let us put germany into the saddle. she will ride'; but in reality he had been the rider and germany the horse. now bethmann threw the reins on the horse's back. [taylor 1945, p. 160] the bethmann conscience that helped shape max weber's germany is precisely what weber advocates and encourages as he develops his sociology. the violence that resulted from bethmann' s attempt to be value neutral is herein viewed as nothing more nor less than weber's attempt to transfer the supposed objectivity of his science to bureaucracy. the result was a scientific equation that attempted to link the social organization of bureaucracy with the socio-economic arrangements of a nationalistic corporate capitalism -to make capitalism as value-neutral as weber believed bureaucracy was. such objectivity was, among other things, to form the core of the kind of education weber thought necessary to reconstruct war-torn germany. in a 1918 letter addressed to a frankfort colleague he writes: " 'objectivity' (sachlichkeit) as sole means to achieve pureness and the feeling of shame against the disgusting exhibitionism of those who are morally broken down --only this will provide us with a firm attitude ..." (see mayer 1955, p. 65). for weber, this objective 47 alternate routes attitude was fostered by the supposedly value-neutral social organization of bureaucracy and he celebrated, patterning his science after, the increasing efficiency with which modern government from bismarck to bethmann was able to exclude "love, hatred, and every purely personal . . . feeling from the execution of official tasks" (see bendix 1962, p. 483). l2 weber's objectivity: scientific schizophrenia in his essay on " 'objectivity' in social science and social policy" weber argues that "it can never be the task of an empirical science tc provide binding norms and ideals from which directives for immediate practical activity can be derived." [weber (1904) 1949, p. 52] "existential knowledge" is to be distinguished from "normative knowledge" -what "is" must be separated from what "should be." [weber (1904) 1949, p. 51] for weber, scientific analysis cannot directly evaluate the appropriateness of a given goal or end, but only the appropriateness of the means for achieving that end. [see weber (1904) 1949, pp. 52-54] in order to maintain this view that social science ("the analysis of f.icts") cannot directly address questions of social policy ("statement of ideals") weber introduces a scientific rationality that permits the sociologist to detach, at least partially, science from its cultural context. thus, weber's sociologist is allowed to consider, and be influenced by, cultural surroundings only in the initial stages of research and only on the condition that motives and afi capitalist ideology values remain "scientifically oriented." ... in social sciences the stimulus to the posing of scientific problems is in actuality always given by practical "questions." hence the very recognition of the existence of a scientific problem coincides, personally, with the possession of scientifically oriented motives and values. . . [weber (1904) 1949, p. 61] as research progresses, this cultural influence that initially helps to determine the scientific problem can be, in weber's view, carefully controlled by the social scientist. capable of distinguishing between "scientifically oriented" values and "normative standards," weber's sociologist uses scientific wisdom to separate empirical from normative self -the objective-scientist self leaves questions concerning social policy to be answered by sentimental-citizen self: ... it should be constantly made clear to the readers (and -again we say it -above all to one's self!) exactly at which point the scientific investigator becomes silent and the evaluating and acting person begins to speak. in other words, it should be made explicit just where the arguments are addressed to the analytical understanding and where to the sentiments . . . [weber (1904) 1949, p. 60] in this manner weber reasons a scientific schizophrenia that permits the sociologist to develop a value-relevant understanding of social reality without making value judgments, [see weber (1904) 1949, pp. 55-56] the result is a sociology that is shaped by weber's efforts to be value neutral -to separate his scien:ific from his political (citizen) self. this separation can be viewed as an important heuristic device aiding weber in exploring and explaining the rationality of his scientific methodology. this separation can also be viewed as 49 alitknait kuuitb being largely responsible for prohibiting weber from sufficientlyexploring and explaining the logic of the way in which value judgments influence the practice of social scientists. in failing to attend to this matter of value rationality weber is unable to adequately understand either the content of, or be clear about when he is moving between, the two selves and their respective worlds which he creates. ironically, then, it is precisely the movement between these two worlds, a separation weber made with the intention of eliminating bias, which accounts for the persistent value bias that characterizes his sociology -namely, his scientific support of capitalism. schizophrenic objectivity and weber's capitalism = bureaucracy equation the science that allows weber to distinguish between and separate means from end, fact from value, objective knowledge from emotional action as he moves between his scientist and citizen worlds also facilitates a separation sf the economic from the political. this dichotomy permits weber in defining power--"the possibility of imposing one's will upon the behavior of other persons" (see rheinstein and shils 1954, p. 323) -to make a further distinction between voluntary agreement and authoritative imposition. [weber (1925) 1947, pp. 148-149] it is this split which in turn forms the basis for weber's distinction between interest groups, the primary focus of his economic sociology, and types of authority, 50 capitalist ideology the major concern of his political sociology. [see weber (1925) 1947] 1s the result of this bifurcation of reality is that weber obscures the interrelationships between the agreements of interest groups and the imposition of authorities; as jean cohen (1972, p. 65) and more recently, erik olin wright (1974-75, pp. 94-95) have argued, domination becomes the "authoritarian power of command" as weber locates power not in economic relations of class, but in the political relations of bureaucracy. for weber, the primary characteristic of bureaucratic social organization is the rationalized specialization of tasks, the development of a hierarchy of authority. as anthony giddens (1972) points out, this characteristic is also the most important, the most essential, feature of weber's rational capitalism -an economic system he defines as being "identical with the pursuit of profit, and forever renewed profit, by means of continuous, rational . . . enterprise." [weber (1904-05) 1958, p. 17] weber argues -to follow the giddens thesis -that the labor of administrative officials is like the labor of the workers whom they administer (control), "expropriated" from the means of production by the bureaucratic form of social organization. this separation of administrative staff from the material means of administrative organization allows weber to equate managers with workers; similarly, it also serves to equate bureaucracy with, and to legitimate, the existent division of labor produced by modern capitalism. (see giddens 1972, pp. 34-36) much of weber's work, in addition to his writing on bureaucracy, 51 is concerned with the development of capitalism in germany. his doctoral dissertation of 1889 examined the various legal principles by which medieval trading companies were allowed to combine in order to minimize the risk of private enterprise. subsequently, he studied the junker estates of east prussia and worker-motivation in his grandfather's linen factory in westphalia. his several speeches to the congresses of the verein fur sozialpolitik in 1905, 1907, 1909 and 1911, touched upon such topics as cartels and the state, economic communal enterprises, the growth of bureaucracy, and the problems of productivity and psychology of the working classes. in none of this work does weber ever seem to 18 fundamentally question the sanctity of capitalism. however, he is careful to promote a particular kind of capitalism. accordingly, in his 1909 speech weber decries the addiction to order produced by "the unquestioning idolization of bureaucracy." he argues that this "predilection for bureaucracy" is "a purely moral sentiment." therefore, he urges that this "belief in the unshakability of the undoubtedly high moral standard of german officialdom" be replaced with a more objective system. although this system would be based upon "the expansion of private capital, coupled with a purely business officialdom which is more easily exposed to corruption," it would help germany increase her 'power value', "the ultimate value," among the nations of the world. 19 [weber (1909) in mayer 1955, pp. 125-131] ten years later, amidst the post-war clamor for socio-economic arrangements that 52 capitalist ideology were more socialistic, weber again offers an "objective" defense of an "objective" capitalism: we have truly no reason to love the lords of heavy industry. indeed, it is one of the main tasks of democracy to break their destructive political influence. however, economically their leadership is not only indispensable, but becomes more so than ever now, when our whole economy and all its industrial enterprises will have to be organized anew. the communist manifesto quite correctly emphasized the economically (not the politically) revolutionary character of the work of the bourgeois-capitalist entrepreneur. no trade union, least of all a state-socialist official, can carry out these functions for us. we must simply make use of them, in their right place: hold out to them their necessary premium -profits -without, however, allowing this to go to their heads. only in this way today'. -is the advance of socialism possible. [giddens 1972, pp. 24-25] once again, weber's scientific schizophrenia permits him to posit a fragmented world -a world in which the development of a science that is objective links weber's sociology to a capitalism built upon the objectivity of bureaucracy. the value neutrality that supposedly results, in fact, creates the value bias of his impotent sociology. it is a sociology that can be nothing else but a legitimation of prevailing socio-economic arrangements -the arrangements of a german capitalism that weber himself referred to as "the fate of our time" (see loewith 1970, p. 119). thus, in perceptively criticizing those who mistake state-controlled cartel lization (monopolization) of profit and wage interests for the ideal of a "democratic" or "socialist" future, weber proceeds to characterize a viable alternative moving in the direction of 53 alternate routes this ideal, the organization of consumer interests, as a "pipe dream." [weber (1918) 1968, p. 1454] for weber, then, the development of a workable socialism must wait upon the capitalism of a refined state bureaucracy. in weber's sociology, capitalism becomes equated with, interchangeable with, bureaucracy. through a process of substitution the central problem of the german socio-economic order becomes bureaucracy, rather than capitalism; the problem is no longer economic, the fact that one class profits by the labor of another, but political -that is to say, bureaucratic. people do not dominate (control) one another; instead, hierarchical offices (bureaucratic roles) dominate each other (see cohen 1972; giddens 1972, p. 36). people "alienate" each other not because of the way in which interaction is affected by their relationship to the means of production, but because of their "objective" relationship to bureaucratic hierarchies. thus, weber focuses considerable attention on what he referred to as "the leadership 20 problem" (see wright 1974-7s, pp. 96-97). bureaucratic social change: the routinization of charismatic leadership weber was early aware that it was the political leaders elected by the people, and not the people or masses themselves, who safeguard capitalism, and the economic leaders "necessary premium 21 profits --", against "the dictatorship of the official." i bismarck regime had left germany with a strongly centralized s4 capitalist ideology bureaucracy unable, in weber's view, to provide the independent political leadership to carry out the "tasks of the nation" 22 (giddens 1972, p. 35). thus, in his 1895 inaugural lecture (antrittsrede) as professor of ecoromics at the university of freiburg, he speaks of the necessity for developing the political leadership of the economically prosperous bourgeoisie -leadership which would, without becoming despotic, "place the political powerinterests of the nation above all other considerations" (see giddens 1972, p. 17). the threatening thing in our situation ... is that the bourgeois classes, as the bearers of the pflkfirinterests of the nation, seem to wilt away, while thete are no signs that the workers are beginning to show the maturity to replace them. the danger does not . . . lie with the masses. it is not a question of the economic position of the ruled , but rather the political qualification of the ruling and as cending classes which is the ultimate issue in tn~e social-political problem. [giddens 1972, pp. 17-18] scientist weber provides citizen weber with a solution to this problem, the leader with charisma. this extraordinary individual, like weber's superhuman sociologist, is able to put his fragmented world back together again, protecting both the wilting bourgeoisie and the immature workers from the political dangers of bureaucracy/ capitalism. that these dangers, in weber's view, have little or nothing to do with class differences, the economic relationship between the rulers and the rulec, logically anticipates his particular kind of "voluntarism." in brief, it is a freedom of action that becomes rationally reserved for the super individual, the charismatic leader, whose personal magnetism "preaches, creates, 55 alternate routes or demands new obligations" [weber (1925) 1947, p. 361] of bureaucracy/capitalism. for weber, charismatic domination is, at least initially, the very opposite of bureaucratic domination. "pure" charisma is antithetical to all ordered economy. "it is the very force that disregards economy . . . where its 'pure' type is at work, it is the very opposite of the institutionally permanent" (gerth and mills 1946, p. 248). however, it is precisely this instability of charismatic authority which according to weber permits it to be fitted into the reality of socio-economic relations: . . . genuine charisma rests upon the legitimation of personal heroism or personal revelation. yet precisely this quality of charisma as an extraordinary, supernatural, divine power transforms it, after its routinization, into a suitable source for the legitimate acquisition of sovereign power by the successors of the charismatic hero. routinized charisma thus continues to work in favor of all those whose power and possession is guaranteed by that sovereign power, and who thus depend upon the continued existence of such power. [gerth and mills 1946, p. 262] charisma, then, becomes routinized to answer the "need of social strata, privileged through existing political, social, and economic orders, to have their social and economic positions 'legitimized'" (see gerth and mills 1946, p. 262). in the final analysis, even weber's super individual, the charismatic leader, must eventually cooperate in tailoring (routinizing) 'irrational" and "revolutionary' passions to fit the bureaucracy (the capitalism) of prevailing socio-economic arrangements. weber writes: "the routinization of charisma, in quite essential respects, is identical with adjustment to the conditions of the economy, that is, to the continuously 56 capitalist ideology effective routines of workaday life. in this, the economy leads and is not led" (see gerth and mills 1946, p. 54). 23 weber's antidote for this deadening effect of bureaucracy/ capitalism, is, as both cohen (1972) and wright (1974-75) point out, individualistic opposition -an opposition which is to be based upon acceptance of the prevailing normative definitions of the existent socio-economic system. even weber's chosen agent of change, the charismatic political leader, has no other alternative but to work from within bureaucracy/capitalism, cooperating with the privileged social strata in cooling charisma. the passions which initiate change are to be carefully monitored (routinized) to fall considerably short of that "carnival we decorate with the proud name of •revolution'." [weber (1919) 1946, p. 115] for weber, the point is not to alter the bureaucracy/capitalism that allows some individuals to dominate at the expense of others; rather, "the point is to salvage the soul against the impersonal, calculating formal rationality of domination" (cohen 1972, p. 82). 24 super leaders, superman sociologists, and weber's ideal type as stereotype the salvation urged by weber's sociology helps ensure the continuation of bureaucratic/capitalistic domination. both weber's "mildmannered daily reporter," the superman sociologist, and his charismatic leader can , like clark kent, "leap tall buildings at a single bound" -providing the appearance of transcending reality, while actually preserving it. weber's faith in the charisma of a 57 alternate routes super agent of change -the logical extension of, and counterpart to, his super scientist -is transformed into a faith in prevailing socio-economic arrangements. thus, while his charismatic leader and sociologist alike are able to momentarily transcend their cultural surroundings -the former at the outset, prior to the routinization of charisma, and the latter nearer the completion of value-relevant, but not value-biased, scientific work -they resign themselves to cultural influences at that point in their work most crucial to the maintenance of the established socio-economic system. in brief, the charismatic leader's' personal magnetism creates a passion that, in falling short of revolution, becomes locked into (routinized by) the prevailing socio-economic system. similarly, the superman sociologist's objectivity creates a science in which his problem-producing reality becomes locked into the "phone booth" 25 of weber's imagination -a science that leaves him incapable of emerging to observe how his sociology is changed by, but unable to change, existent socio-economic arrangements . weber's phone booth is the ideal type. it is this methodological technique that permits the transformation of citizen weber's empirical reality into the "mental constructs" cf scientist weber. he describes the ideal type as a research procedure in both negative and positive terms. it is not ideal in the sense of advocating something which ought to be. neither is it average in either the sense of a mediation or a summary of all traits common to a given phenomenon. it is not a 58 capitalist ideology proposition about reality which can be empirically verified as reality's "true" essence. thus, the ideal type is neither a hypothesis, nor can it be construed as an end in itself. rather, the ideal type is a technique, a means for constructing and testing hypotheses in order to facilitate comparisons of various aspects of the empirical world. according to weber: ... an ideal type is formed by the one-sided accentuation of one or more points of view and by the synthesis of a great many diffuse, discrete, more or less present and occasionally absent concrete individual phenomena, which are arranged according to those one-sidedly emphasized viewpoints into a unified analytical construct (gedankenbild) . in its conceptual purity, this mental construct ( gedankenbild) cannot be found empirically anywhere in reality. it is a utopia . . . [weber (1904) 1949, p. 90] however, while the ideal type is never actually found in reality, it must be "objectively possible." [weber (1904) 1949, p. 80] logical soundness, then, is the basis upon which such a type is to be accepted as a reliable tool for use in research designed to check its validity. emphasis on logic to construct abstractions which neither are fully realized in, nor are accurately representative of, the material world is often characteristic of another type, the stereotype. both the ideal type and the stereotype involve exaggerating certain key features, while ignoring certain other features, of a phenomenon for the purpose of organizing observation into categories. it is usually argued by weber's many current disciples that such a comparison is unfair, not legitimate. the ideal type, they contend, 59 alternate routes is a "scientific" tool used to guard against the tendency to stereotype -to type emotionally, using both preconceived beliefs and varied empirical data gathered from biased sources to emphasize negative characteristics. [weber (1904) 1949, especially pp. 90-91] such reasoning is, however, extremely weak protest, as it fails to dismiss the fact that both types can be formulated so as to meet weber's primary criteria of abstractness and logical soundness leading to objective possibility. the result of typing in both instances is often a "picture in the mind -a preconceived (i.e., not based on experience) standardized, group-shared idea" which has been oversimplified (hoult 1974, p. 319). the phenomenon examined is logically cleansed of its contradictions — made into "a pure abstraction of the understanding" (see mueller 1959) . the world becomes a matter of competing interpretations -definitions of the situation -with the appellation "scientific" used to distinguish among various typologies, withholding credibility from some and lending it to others. in sun, in constructing his sociology, weber carefully overlooks the primary fact concerning this competition: namely, that both the ideal type of the scientist and the stereotype of the citizen are, like all other abstractions, given a fixed form in the reality of everyday living by the powerful -usually at the expense of the less powerful. weber's inability to see that it is the powerful 's desire to replace symbols (definitions of the situation) no longer effective in dominating the less powerful which constitutes 60 capitalist ideology the new knowledge necessitating the construction of fresh ideal types, is scientific blindness attributable to the "objectivity" of his sociology. this objectivity, residing in the sociologist's scientific and not citizen self, is supposed to produce a science that is value neutral; instead, it encourages development of a body of knowledge that is subjective and biased -a sociology that permits weber to live in both his worlds without adequately understanding either one. it is a sociology that, like the ideal type which provides its basic insights, confuses appearances with the actualities of the social world it attempts to describe and analyze. thus, bureaucracy appears to be equatable with capitalism, manager with worker, people with offices, power with politics, political leadership with change. such confusion is characteristic of a science most concerned with preserving rather than changing the reality of prevailing socio-economic arrangements; a science that enlists the superhuman qualities of charismatic leaders and scientific sociologists to create a sociology which supports that which is, as opposed to that which might be. conclusion and present-day implications the sociology of max weber, above all else, is a science oriented towards preserving the rapidly maturing german capitalism of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. his justification of existing socio-economic arrangements was accomplished "objectively." for weber, the socio-economic arrangements of german capitalism at the turn of the century were not only "the fate" of his time, but also the facts "the truth is the truth," spoke weber from his deathbed in munich -61 alternate routes his last attempt to support the objective sociology which could alone give credence to these final words. since that june day in 1920 the many and varied implications of weber's objective science have been explored by his disciples and critics alike. there is one major implication which continues to be of primary importance: the "executive privilege" that has welded nationalistic passions to the developing multi-national economic system from bismarck to bethmann to pierre eliott trudeau, richard m. nixon and gerald r. ford, can be more readily extended to bureaucratic sociologists if scientific work is thought to exist in a realm of reason set apart from a sphere of sentiment. for modern social scientists this apparently objective sociology capable of separating values from facts, the political economy from science, has; been most appealing. it becomes even more appealing when combined with weber's bureaucracy-equals-capitalism analysis which gives considerable impetus to a trend he bemoaned -namely, the increasingly narrow range of choices open to most individuals as capitalism matures. such analysis makes it easier for modern sociologists to take a "factual" view of the dominant socio-economic arrangements of their day that is in harmony with weber's description of german capitalism in 1900 as "the fate of our time." in developing this view, they may be able to gain a measure of security for themselves by reproducing the curious paradox which makes it appear that weber's sociology mourns the decline and replacement of the cultivated and well-rounded individual by the technician, while it actually 62 capitalist ideology encourages a role of growing importance for the specialized expert -a professional. in sum, the most potentially dangerous suggestion implied by weber's legacy to present-day social scientists involves the possibility of their continued emphasis upon, and the consequent growth in importance of, objective sociology as the focal point of the professionalism which guides their scientific practice. dangerous, because it is a professionalism that encourages weber's social scientists to see themselves as members of interest groups of a particular kind -interest groups which they view as being somewhat autonomous from other groups in a society supposedly made more pluralistic ("democratic") by their presence. with objective training in a specific discipline, social scientists in the weberian mold claim the capability to stand apart from and control the passions that sway the masses. like weber, their "constellations of interest" give way to both charismatic leaders and superhuman sociologists who transcend the ordinary by pacifying passion in a professional manner. these educated and relatively autonomous professionals know the truth as weber saw it. also, their sociologies continue to develop arguments reiterating the most fundamental paradox characteristic of his science: the objectivity that is supposed to preserve the pluralism of choice among conflicting values, results instead in a value-partisanship -a partisanship that further strengthens the dominating position of a wealthy and privileged elite engaged in fashioning a capitalism that is increasingly one-dimensional. 63 alternate routes notes 1. the riots of unemployed germans and the nearly continual depression suffered by the americans from 1873 to 1898 called into question the central assumptions of laissez faire capitalism. the transition to corporate capitalism questioned the harmony between self-interests and the interests of the larger society, the "natural law" of supply and demand as automatic balance, and the state's role of non-interference with this natural law. as the state moved from its role of referee to that of regulator of economic activity, it repeatedly intervened to extend the limits of the marketplace and further concentrate industrial wealth in the holdings of a relatively few corporate capitalists. this process proceeded somewhat more rapidly in the united states than in germany. even so, the concentration of available german capital in banks, to take an important indicator of corporate development, was occurring at the same time (the last quarter of the nineteenth century), if not a little earlier, in germany than it was in the united states. by 1900 both countries were characterized by comparatively well-developed corporate economies. mann (1968, especially pp. 200-203) provides more details concerning the growth of corporate socio-economic arrangements in germany, and williams (1966) does the same for the united states. 2. the adjective charismatic is used here to indicate the fact that "specifically exceptional qualities," to borrow from weber's own definition of charisma, of bismarck's personality had important effects on the german masses. its use is not meant to suggest, however, that bismarck (or hitler) derived the power with which he ruled by personal magnetism alone. on the contrary, the governmental administration bismarck created is a near-perfect example of social organization designed to routinize charisma by legitimating power within the confines of bureaucratic routine. 3. with reference to the american economy, this link between socio-economic reforms which marked the transformation from laissez faire to corporate capitalism and the origins of a scientific sociology has been traced by smith (1965; 1970). with reference to the socio-economic reform of the german economy in relation to political leadership and the development of a scientific sociology, it should be noted that weber at times spoke against bismarck. [weber (1918) 1968, pp. 138s-1392; gerth and mills 1946, pp. 31-33; bendix 1962, pp. 443-444] however, the fact that weber sometimes denounced eismarck for his intolerance of independent-minded political leaders and his reliance upon advisors who were nothing more than docile and obedient servants of governmental bureaucracy, does not alter and should not overshadow the equally important, if not more important, fact that weber's sociology was a powerful reinforcement for -essentially an imitation of -bismarck's 64 capita n sx. laeoiogy bureaucratic administration. bendix (1962, p. 451) includes a brief note to the effect that weber exempted bismarck from his "wholesale indictment" of monarchical and bureaucratic absolutism. 4. this combination of factors constituting the central focus of weber's sociology was not new among german intellectuals. weber's notion of an "objective" science dates back at least to kant and hegel, as well as being clearly evident in the beliefs and actions of johann fichte. professor fichte of the university of berlin was an outspoken advocate of german nationalism -believing that the superiority of the german people made it imperative that the germans not only govern themselves, but also the french and all the other peoples of europe as well. fichte's nationalism was strongly supported by his conceptions of the nature of science and of the university setting within which it was taught. nearly 100 years before weber wrote about separating reason from emotion, fichte, evidently fearing that the outbreak of war in 1813 might bring emotional bias into his classroom, dramatically cancelled his lectures and retired to his study "until the liberation of the fatherland" (see taylor 1945, pp. 44-45). 5. the general point emphasized here has been well-made by blackburn (1969). he, like myself, emphasizes the interconnections between prevailing socio-economic arrangements and bureaucratic fatalism, charismatic leadership, and social change. the present paper attempts to elaborate these interconnections by offering a more detailed examination of weber's value-neutral methodology, the fundamental scientific base upon which weber's sociology rests. 6. for an excellent elaboration of the way in which bismarck attempted to create economic reality that would be in accord with this statement, see engels (1887-88, especially pp. 89-108). despite bismarck's close identification with the junkers, many biographers suggest that he was not raised as one (see, for example, taylor 1955, especially pp. 13-14). 7. some scholars claim that friederich engels and not marx was primarily responsible for writing the series of new york tribune articles bearing the title germany: revolution and counterrevolution . however, whether one chooses to cite engels as does leonard krieger, and link revolution and counter-revolution with engels' earlier work, the peasant war in germany , in order to demonstrate that they are continuous sections of a single theme, or whether one cites marx as is done here, is of li.ttle matter. • the important point is the marx-engels emphasis on analysis which focuses upon the composition and interactions of the different socio-economic classes before and after the revolution of 1848 in germany (see marx 1851-52, especially pp. 4-11, 13, 30-31, 37, 39, 65 alternate routes 41, 43, 46-47, 51-52, infra.) . it should be noted here that historian taylor (1945, p. 77) makes an attempt to disclaim class as a motivating factor in liberal activities during this period; however, this disclaimer does not alter either the essential correctness of the marx-engels analysis, or the fact that these liberals, as professionals, were a part of the emerging middle classes. 8. military power is mayer's emphasis, objectively is mine. earlier weber had supported the naval program of secretary of state for the imperial navy, admiral von tirpitz. as mann (1968) points out, weber "surrendered as much to the cult of power as the imperial admiral" and most other germans by urging the development of sea power as an essential part of world politics designed to protect the german economy. weber writes: only complete political dishonesty and naive optimism can fail to recognize that, after a period of peaceful competition, the inevitable urge of all nations with bourgeois societies to expand their trade must now once more lead to a situation in which power alone will have a decisive influence on the extent to which individual nations will share in the economic control of the world, and thus determine the economic prospects of their peoples and of their workers in particular, [see mann 1968, p. 262] 9. for another historian's view concerning the conservative and reactionary policy developed by bismarck, see eyck (1948, especially pp. 15-18). 10. this was the paradoxical irony of the bismarck administration: that in order to protect his own power, bismarck was continually forced to support a policy of unification which moved the nation ever closer to the greater germany he did not desire. 11. biilow's "world policy" had been developing for some years under his predecessors. caprivi, especially, was very active in foreign affairs (see mann 1968, pp. 255-256). for more details on the way in which biilow directed germany's international relations see mann (1968, pp. 265-270, especially pp. 266 and 268). 12. evidently, weber had no small measure of success in training many of his closest friends and relatives to exclude such sentiment. thus, writing his wife-to-be, marianne, weber cautions: "we must not tolerate within us vague and mystical attitudes. if feelings run high, you must tame them, to steer your life soberly" (mayer 1955, p. 37). later, marianne, in a biography of her 66 vop i (.a i i o fa i ucu i uyj husband, would wtite in the third person (speaking of herself as "she" and of her husband and herself as "they") ; in short, "the indestructible barriers against yielding to passions" (even such "passion" as writing in the first person when speaking about oneself), which marianne notes that weber's mother had developed in him, are also readily observable in marianne herself (see green 1974, pp. 119-120). 13. it should be made clear at the outset of this discussion and analysis that i appreciate the breadth, and realize the several lasting contributions of weber's work. accordingly, only a small portion of his work has been scrutinized, focusing in particular on weber's conceptions of objectivity and bureaucracy, in order to show the way in which his writings on scientific method and social organization have made a lasting impact upon present-day sociology. further, the criticism of weber's notion of "objectivity" presented herein is not meant to undermine or destroy the idea that science as logical method can be of value in comparing several arguments, one to another, in order to attempt a determination of the validity of each. the judgment implied in this determination is recognition of the reality that some arguments make a stronger case then others. the stronger arguments constitute better interpretations of the material world because, to borrow a phrase from c. wright mills, they are closer to "the run of fact." this fact is interpreted by human beings who, rather than possessing as individuals two independent selves, are whole persons whose beings are shaped by a value configuration that results from the intersection of historical influences, the milieu of present social structure, and individual biography. it is within this framework that some arguments and analyses can be considered to be more "objective" than others. for elaboration of this conception of objectivity, the relationship between fact and value, see mills (1961, pp. 76-79, 129-131, and 178). 14. this is not to argue that weber was not acting in "good faith" by emphasizing this separation; he was well aware of the abuse of power and privilege that results when prejudice predominates fact as the major determinant of policy decisions. it is to argue that in moving between his separate worlds weber developed a science, the logic of which could do little other than to offer support for prevailing socio-economic arrangements. it is to argue against the view that the development of sociology by weber which supported and/or paralleled capitalist interests is in the main attributable to accident. 15. the attempt by bendix (1962, p. 289) to apologize for weber's inability to adequately relate his analytical abstractions to the material world cannot make weber's fragmented conception of reality whole. 67 alternate routes 16. for further elaboration see weber (1904-05, p. 19 and chapter ii, "the spirit of capitalism," especially pp. 62-69). also, see gerth and mills (1946, "social structures and types of capitalism," pp. 6s-69); and weber (1925, "the principal modes of capitalistic orientation of profit making, " pp. 278-280). 17. a fuller appreciation of the way in which weber's understanding of the close relationship between bureaucracy and capitalism helped to unite them in his sociology may be gained from further examination of his own writings. [see weber (1918) 1968, pp. 1381-1469, especially pp. 1393-1395] 18. weber [(1918) 1968, pp. 1423-1424] gives further and later evidence of his consistency in protecting capitalistic socioeconomic arrangements. for a complete list of weber's several speeches to the verein fur sozialpolitik see mayer (1955, p. 67). 19. see green (1974) for an excellent study showing the ways in which this split between the moral sentiment of ethics and the objectivity of science affected weber's most intimate relationships. when it comes to drawing out the connections between weber's science and his daily round of activities, the green analysis is superior to any i have read. 20. this focus upon leadership has been carried from weber's work into the present-day by those modern sociologists who develop a pluralistic view of the structure of authority. among the pluralists listed by gillam (1971, pp. 191-198), the "veto group" theory of riesman (1950) and the "dispersed inequalities" thesis of dahl (1961) are two of the most well-known arguments traceable to weber's concern with leadership. in contrast, the legacy left by marx with his "ruling class" model of the structure of power is exemplified today in the "power elite"thesis of mills (1956) and the "governing class" argument of domhoff (1967; 1970) . 21. both giddens (1972, pp. 17-19) and mayer (1955, pp. 44, 94-96) provide short, but excellent, reviews of weber's thinking on the relationship between bureaucracy and democracy. for a more lengthy treatment of similar high quality which compares weber's analysis of this relationship to that of v.i. lenin, see wright (1974-75). 22. weber's emphasis upon leadership has been accurately summarized as follows: "it was weber as much as anyone who made imperialism a respectable political cause in germany" (green 1974, p. 155, also see pp. 149-150, 153). 23. weber thought that "of all those powers that lessen the importance of individual action, the most irresistible is rational discipline" (see gerth and mills 1946, p. 253). for weber, it is 68 capitalist ideology clear that even the charismatic leader must, at some point, submit to the dictates of rationality. thus, weber was able to create and practice a science that could routinize the charisma of a bismarck, supporting he and his successors by separating doctrine from the person who advocates it. he attempted to do this in his own life even when the person involved, otto gross, was openly loved by weber's lover, else von richthofen, and lived a style of life disapproved of by weber (see green 1974, especially pp. 56, 129). 24. the term "superman" should be thought of in a generic sense, for its use is not intended to exclude women. superhuman activities are not limited to the male sex alone, as comic book readers and television viewers who follow the super feats of "wonder woman" are well aware. 25. for those readers who are unfamiliar with superman comics, radio and television programs, public phone booths, as well as restrooms were locations often used by clark kent for his transformation from "mild-mannered daily reporter" into superman. 26. it should be pointed out that the material quoted here is only part of a more complete definition which seems to support weber's notion of the ideal type. 69 alternate routes references bendix, reinhard. 1962. max weber: an intellectual portrait . garden city: doubleday. blackburn, robin. 1969. "a brief guide to bourgeois ideology." pp. 37-46 in student power , edited by alexander cockburn and robin blackburn. baltimore: penguin books. cohen, jean. 1972. "max weber and the dynamics of rationalized domination." telos (winter) : 63-86. dahl, robert a. 1961. who governs? democracy and power in an american city . new haven: yale university press. dcmhoff, g. william. 1967. who rules america?. englewood cliffs: prentice-hall. . 1970. the higher circles . new york: random house. engels, friedrich. (1850, 1851-52) 1967. the german revolutions ( the peasant war in germany and germany: revolution and counter-revolut ion) . leonard krieger, ed. chicago: the university of chicago press. (1887-88) 1972. the role of force in history: a study of bismark's policy of blood and iron , translated by jack cohen and edited by ernst kangermann. new york: international publishers. eyck, erich. 1948. bismarck after fifty years . london: george philip 5 son. gerth, hans h., and c. wright mills. 1946. from max weber: essays in sociology . new york: oxford. giddens, anthony. 1972. politics and sociology in the thought of max weber . toronto: macmillan. gillam, richard, ed. 1971. power in postwar america . boston: little, brown and company. green, martin. 1974. the von richthofen sisters: the triumphant and the tragic modes of love . new york: basic books. 70 capitalist ideology hoult, thomas ford. 1974. dictionary of modern sociology . totowa, new jersey: littlefield, adams $ company. loewith, karl. 1970. "weber's interpretation of the bourgeoiscapitalistic world in terms of the guiding principle of •rationalization*." pp. 101-122 in max weber , edited by dennis wrong. englewood cliffs: prentice-hall. mann, golo. 1968. the history of germany since 1789 . new york: frederick a. praeger. marx, karl. (1851-52) 1952. revolution and counter-revolution or germany in 1848 . eleanor marx ave ling, ed. london: george allen and unwin ltd. mayer, j. p. 1955. max weber and german politics . london: faber and faber. mills, c. wright. 1956. the power elite . new york: oxford. . 1961. the sociological imagination . new york: oxford. mitzman, arthur. 1970. the iron cage: an historical interpretation of max weber . new york: grosset 6 dunlap, inc. mueller, gustav emil, tr. 1959. g.w. f.hegel in encyclopedia of philosophy . new york: philosophical library. rheinstein, max, ed. (edward shils and m. rheinstein, trans.). 1954. max weber on law in economy and society . cambridge: harvard university press. riesman, david. 1950. the lonely crowd . new haven: yale university press. roth, guenther. 1963. the social democrats in imperial germany: a study in working-class isolation and national integration . totowa, new jersey: bedminster press. shuster, george n., and arnold bergstraesser. 1944. germany: a short history . new york: w.w. norton. smith, dusky lee. 1965. "sociology and the rise of corporate capitalism." science and society 29: 401-418. . 1970. some socio-economic influences upon the founding fathers o f sociology in the united states (unpublished ph.d. dissertation) . buffalo: state university of new york. 71 alternate routes taylor, a. j. p. 1945. the course of german history: a survey of the development of germany since 1815 . london: hamish hamilton. . 1955. bismarck: the man and the statesman . new york: alfred a. knopf. weber, max. (1904) 1949. '** objectivity' in social science and social policy." pp. 49-112 in the methodology of the social sciences , translated and edited by edward a. shils and henry a. finch. new york: the free press. . (1904-05) 1958. the protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism , translated by talcott parsons. new york: charles scribner's sons. . (1909) 1955. "max weber on bureaucratization in 1909." pp. 125-131 in max weber and german politics , j. p. mayer. london: faber and faber. . (1918) 1968. "parliament and government in a reconstructed germany." pp. 1381-1469 in economy and society , edited by guenther ross and claus wittich. new york: bedminster. (1919) 1946. "politics as a vocation." pp. 77-128 in from max weber , translated, edited and introduced by gerth and mills. new york: oxford. . (1925) 1947. the theory of social and economic organization , talcott parsons, ed.(a.m. henderson and t. parsons, trans.). new york: oxford. williams, william a. 1966. the contours of american history . chicago: quadrangle books. wright, erik olin. 1974-75. "to control or to smash bureaucracy: weber and lenin on politics, the state, and bureaucracy." berkeley journal of sociology 19: 69-108. 72 alternate editorial board: dan gl alternate routes is an a dents in socio, unicatic department subscript: ; | the unite payable to alternate rou' copyright, 1976, alternate routes, unless o vol. 1 contents i977 macrosociological approaches toward a 1 'canadian sociology' wallace clement the dominion government as gatekeeper to the 38 canadian ethnic mosaic, the case of quebec, 1867-1885 dan glenday embourgeoisement or proletarianization? 58 stan marshall social mobility: current thrusts (and non87 thrusts) :a critical approach to the analysis of mobility jan mayer toward a marxist theory of transition 103 chuck smith commentary class analysis and technological determinism 131 ken campbell implications of the domestic role of women 1^2 eileen saunders editorial statement this, is the first issue of a canadian graduate students journal dedicated to the dissemination of theoretical and empirical problems in the disciplines of sociology and anthropology. we have had to rely on our colleagues within the carleton university community due, in part, to our feeling of isolation from other centers of intellectual activity in canada. i believe it can be safely said that we, here at carleton, are not alone in this perception. we hope the publication of this journal will help to 'break the ice"* and in the years to cone contribute to a dialogue between our friends and colleagues, not only in the province of ontario but throughout canada. isbn 0-7709-0012-7 macrosociological approaches toward a 'canadian sociology ' * wallace clement there is an element of truth to the analogy between the blind men and an elephant and the sociologist and a society. this paper is no more than an attempt to move toward a wider perspective, a macrosociological approach to canadian society, by examining some models and theories of modern national societies. it attempts to contribute to the development of what will be called a 'canadian sociology' approach. as a topic of substantive inquiry, canading society needs to be informed by many disciplines, encompassing history, economics, political science (or more generally political economy), social pyschol°gy» social geography, anthropology and sociology. because of its breadth the latter seems suited, more than the others, to encompass each of these disciplines —at least potentially it can. there is little evidence of a general movement in englishspeaking canada toward a 'canadian sociology' approach in the sense of a holistic analysis generated from an understanding of distinctive characteristics, relations and patterns within canada. many approaches have been 'imported', largely by way of the united states, using canada simply as another data source or experimental situation without developing a national society perspective. however, in quebec the situation is exceptional since a 'total society' or societe globale viewpoint is common and the analysis has been indigenous to quebec , thus recognizing the obvious: quebec is not a miniature replica of the united states —something english-speaking counterparts often find hard to comprehend for the rest of canada*. levels of analysis following georges gurvitch, guy rocher suggests three classif icatory levels of analysis: the first is the macrosociological plane of total societies, which includes social groups that are sufficiently complete to satisfy all the needs of their members—such as a country, or western civilization. these groups are considered as wholes or units. the •canada's 'two solitudes' are suggested by guy rocher, "it must be recognized that among many differences, canadian sociology separates clearly into two major categories: frenchlanguage sociology and english-language sociology. they are almost airtight entities. two almost impermeable worlds live side by side in almost total, mutual ignorance" (1974:501). ignorance of the societe glohale perspective used by quebec sociologists has impeded others from developing a perspective on canadian society as a whole while quebec sociologists seldom venture into the res* of canada to apply their perspective, maintaining a somewhat understandable but narrowed inward focus. see also claude gousse's, "reflexions sur l'avenir de la sociologie au quebec" in loubser (editor), 1970. second is the plane of partial groupings which form part of total societies, such as the family, lineal groupings, voluntary associations, social classes, and so forth. finally, there is the microsociological plane of different types of social links... the various social relationships which are established between the members of a collectivity and the different ways in which these members are linked to and by the total society (1972:3-4). these are various points of perception for the analyst but are meant to "interpenetrate" and "link" with one another. for rocher, the macrosociological plane is both the place to begin and end; it is the context for all other investigation and the level towards which all investigation is directed (5). the goal is the "total context" or a holistic analysis.* however, rocher's meaning of macrosociology is much more precise than others. usually macrosociology refers to "largescale social systems and patterns of interrelationships within and between these systems, including, for example, national and international forms of social organization" in contrast to microsociology as "the study of small groups".** thus many of the aspects classified by rocher on the second plane are often referred to as macrosociological, serving to impose a very large gap between macro and micro levels without any mediating levels. for this reason the rocher-gurvitch classification is more useful. classif icatory problems are different from analytical ones. to provide an analysis of canadian society it will be necessary to distinguish three types of macrosociological terms. the first may be called 'macrogroupings ' and corresponds to rocher's second plane and what is usually referred to as macrosociology. the other two aim at a holistic perspective and may be referred to as 'total society' and 'national society' approaches. a 'total society' approximates the first plane identified by rocher in the sense that common social and cultural bonds prevail, as exhibited in common identity, values and traditions, usually carried in a common language and organizations which serve to preserve a particular culture. the conditions for a 'total society' are much stronger than those for a 'national society' in terms of the degree of cultural integra•this approach may be contrasted with a social -psychological one like manzer who turns his analysis towards 'human needs' or the microsociological level (1974:5-22). •*these definitions are provided in george and achilles theodorson's modern dictionary of sociology , thomas y. crowell: new york, 1969. tion evident since the latter is delineated simply by territory and legal-political perimeters commonly referred to as a 'state'. in the former, the degree of social integration is much more important in terms of setting 'boundaries' for analysis while in the latter, the extent of integration within states is left problematic. to demonstrate that a 'national society' is at the same time a 'total society', it would be necessary to show that its members share a common identity, common values and traditions and that these members are bounded by a political-legal state which they command. it may be that in some cases the two coincide at particular historical junctures--although it appears this seldom occurs--wh ile in other cases they do not. this distinction is particularly relevant to canada but elsewhere as well.* the primary defining characteristic of macro units is the scale of their implications for the total society and the scope of their inter-relationships within the total social structure. thus, s.z. klausner has adopted the term "total society", to refer to: an ecologically delimited, more or less interdependent set of human collectivities. the student of a total society could inquire into the spatial and/or organizational interdependence of events. he could report the impact of a society's northern upon its southern region, of its army upon its factories, and of its ethnic groups upon its political parties. the term 'total' indicates an intent to consider all of the people in that particular area (1967:3). as this suggests, what is of central importance is the relationships, or as klausner prefers "links", which mediate between various dimensions. as he says, "a model of a 'total society', while recognizing the distinctness of various theoretical levels, must be concerned with statements which link a term on one level with a term on another" (6) . he remarks that many attempts at 'total society' analysis have failed to specify these 'links' between different aspects and levels. these 'mediating mechanisms* are the critical component for models of 'total societies' because they specify how relationships occur and provide direction to correlations. this parallels the •see, for example, jan szczepanski' s , polish society , where he says, "in the years 1795-1918, poland was a nation without statehood, and, because it lacked its own independent political organization, culture constituted the very basis of national existence ....this distinction must always be kept in mind when dealing with eastern and central europe, where the ethnic and cultural areas have never been the same as the political-state demarcations" (1970:4). jews and israel may be a further example. earlier point by rocher but just as with rocher does not distinguish between a 'total' and 'national' society as two distinct ways of delineating tht-perimeters of study. in canada it may be that les quebecois have a 'total society', as may some english-speaking canadians, but les que becois do not have a 'national society' (although some are striving to achieve this); moreover, it may be that for some the english-speaking 'total society' extends beyond canada as a state into the united states and possibly the west as a whole. these are both empirical propositions which could be explored. language is a problem here because in french, nat ion has the connotation given here to 'total society', as in lord durham's famous caricature of "two nations warring in the bosom of a single state".* the tension between the lack of coincidence between a 'total' and 'national' society in quebec has been one of the major motor forces explaining developments in that society and accounts for many of the reasons why quebec sociologists have been so intimately concerned with this issue. however, in the rest of canada a similar problem has also emerged in the for« of nationalism which attempts to identify a distinctiveness vis 1 vis the united states. the native peoples in canada experience a similar dilemma vis a vis the white world, while there are runblings of similar contradictions between western, eastern and central canada. to th cify focus refer socio note indee the n later does pi ica ter-^s devel final e majo the pa is on red to logy, this d d, the at iona in th not ig t ions of th opment ly, in r dist rticul what earli this oes no exter 1 leve e pape norc t of int e impl s. terms of inction in ar level o may be cal er as a 'n being sai t mean tha nal impact 1 and will r . s i m i 1 a he interna ernal phen ications o leve thi f an led atio d, h t th is rec riy. 1 le omen f th is of s pape alysis the na nal so owever e e x t e crucia eive a a foe vel , e on on e nati analy r, it bein t iona ciety . it rnal 1 to good us on ither the n onal sis , is i g pur 1 lev ' app is im level an un deal the in t ation level befo mpor sued el o roac port can ders of nati erms al 1 for re proceeding tant to spehere. the r what w3s h to macroant to be ignored; tandinc of emphasis onal level of the imevel or in internal 'the distinction between 'total' and 'national' society adds a necessary analytical distinction to macrosociological theory. this problem is pointed to by anthony giddens when he says, "the primary unit of sociological analysis, the sociologists' 'society', in this sense, has never been the isolated, 'internally developing' system which has normally been implied in social theory" (1973:264-265). it is only a 'total society' which is really a 'society' in this sense, yet it too must be placed in the context of other societies which compose its environment. the ultimate level of analysis in macrosociology would be the study of a wide range of total societies and national societies. but it will be argued later that a prerequisite to this is a solid base in a number of national society analyses, and particularly here, to develop such an analysis for canada. a 'sociology of canada 1 and a 'canadian sociology* a 'sociology of canada' is restricted to the level of 'macrogroupings ' at best, and at a microsociological level at worst. on the other hand, a 'canadian sociology' attempts to move between the analytical levels of 'national' and 'total' societies, both of which inform the type of analysis being promoted here, and be informed by a holistic perspective. there have been some recent attempts to develop a 'canadian sociology' approach, an analysis of the enterprise as a whole and the formation of canada as a state, but a variety of 'sociology of canada' perspectives continue to dominate; that is, most sociological studies are of individual aspects of canadian society viewed either in isolation or compared with similar phenomenon elsewhere. each approach is important but essentially different. a 'canadian sociology' focuses on major structural features of the country--such as regionalism, ethnic relations, foreign and indigenous investment patterns, political-legal formations and class structures--as they relate in a national context, especially as they unfold and transform historically. 'canadian sociology' is not a theory about canadian society, although it implies a series of models for organizing information, rather, it is a synoptic perspective which conceptually links together a variety of theories and data on canada while making the analyst aware of other factors which may affect or be affected by the particular aspect of society under study. for example, if the subject under study is education, it would be fruitful to know the linkage this has with immigration and the canadian practice of importing highly qualified manpower rather than creating indigenous educational institutions or the linkage between the type of economy canada has and demands this creates for particular training. similarly, it is important to know the type of class structure canada has if education is to be related to class inequalities or the type of sex roles if it is to be related to sexual inequalities. the point is selfevident. the implication being that there emerges from these linkages a broader understanding of various developments by removing them from a narrow view common to a great deal of sociology. similarly, it is concerned about aggregating data on canada into meaningful units of analysis. all that makes it a ' canad ian sociology' perspective as distinct from a 'japanese, american, polish, british, french, australian, russian, etc. sociology' is the substantive focus. this does not mean that various key features such as regionalism, ethnicity, class, etc. will be identical or even similar in each nation. the similarity is that what is being pursued here is simply a specific case of a more general 'national society' perspective. the key is the holistic analysis of a variety of important social phenomenon within a national context. a 'sociology of canada 1 perspective, on the other hand, focuses on particular aspects of the society, such as those listed above or others like education, immigration, sex roles, deviance, voting patterns, urban studies, etc. but does not relate each to other developments within canada. it may compare them with other countries, a la lipset or alford, but is not essentially concerned about the way they combine, emerge and affect one another. if rocher's point about the macrosociological plane being both the place to begin and end is accepted, then the problematic is the extent to which several 'sociologies of canada 1 could be turned into a 'canadian sociology' by transcending individual studies and relating them to one another.* while the individual models and frameworks used in ' soc iolc gies of canada' do not facilitate this end, the information and theories generated may be able to inform a 'canadian sociology'. the idea of a 'canadian sociology' is not based simply on a series of microsociological or macrogrouping studies or even an enumeration of national statistics, but hinges on the relationships and combinations of various elements which crystallize into a unique whole. rather than dealing with each substantive aspect of canadian society discretely, it attempts to tie them into a total framework on the development, structure and operation of the society. a recent book by ronald manzer, canada: a socio-pol i t ical report (1974), will illustrate the distinction being drawn here. although covering a very wide range of topics and providing abundant empirical data on canada, manzer does not organize his analysis or direct himself to the question of a national society, rather, he tends to deal with a wide range of rather specialized topics without attempting to bring them together in a comprehensive national statement in the way, say, john porter did in the vertical mosaic (1965) where he elaborated relations between *as amitai ltzioni metaphorically points out, it may be "that the study of the trivial fruit fly led to the understanding of some general laws of genet ics .... but just as the anatomy of elephants cannot be studied by dissecting fruit flies, so, too, the morphology of macroscopic social units cannot be effectively explored by studying the structure of small groups" (196r:4r). the themes of class, power and ethnicity within the context of canada as a national society. manzer provides a 'sociolocy of canada', porter a 'canadian sociology'. this is not to sav porter produced the complete analysis of canada as a national society; this probably could never be accomplished in one book (and even if possible, it would certainly become dated). for instance, porter focused his analysis of canada on indigenous national elites and tends to by-pass regional differences which a national framework could have paid more attention to, particularly asking why some regions tend not to produce elites or elites of different types. similarly, he had a tendency to bvpass in some senses the external impact on canada and also overlook the historical specificity of some of the many studies recorded in his book. but what he did do was analyse the interaction between class, power and ethnicity as they form canada's social structure and 'the vertical mosaic'. manzer's report, however, has no real theme or theory about the operation or organization of canadian society.* he provides an evaluation based on the ideals of fraternity, equality and liberty, hut not a national society approach which would be addressed to a total set of conditions explaining why these ideals have not been achieved, if indeed, they are the ideals of canadian society. in this paper there is no attempt to provide a sociology of sociology for canada, nor a survey of sociological findincs themselves. rather, the attempt is to examine a series of models and approaches which may prove useful in developing a 'canadian sociology', particularly those which may expand the analysis of canadian society already provided by porter's pathbreaking work and some issues relevant to such an analysis. but first, a larger context is necessary. macrosociology and the 'classical tradition' macrosociology** focuses on structures, types of relationships, and their degree of dependence or independence; in short, how social systems work***. it is in the tradition of sociolo*for example, in a book of well over 300 pages, manzer devotes less than 10 pages to his introduction and conclusion combined, while his first chapter on "human needs and political goods" has only a passing reference to canada. the remainder of the book is devoted to reporting on important statistical comparisons with other countries. **for a recent discussion of macrosociology, see paul f. lazarsfeld's main trends in sociology . harper & row: ny, 1973:22-36. ***c. wright mills provides a series of questions in his sociol og ical imagination which represent some areas a national society approach could explore: "(1) what is the structure of this par8 gists like marx and weber who attempted, in the words of gerth and mills, "to grasp the interrelations on all institutional orders making up a social structure" (1946:49). but what is meant by 'structure'? a social structure is a stable set of relationships among the various parts or elements making up the totality of a society. however, to say these relationships are stable does not discount their continuous transformation. as z.a. jordan has said in his summary of marx, "macro-sociological structures and laws can claim validity only within a specified period of time and, therefore, must be considered historically" (1971:66). "to analytically 'weave' various institutional orders into a whole from the perspective of national societies requires a historical dimension which seeks to comprehend the interactive effects between different orders, their exchanges—both of decision-makers and resources—and their relative strengths or weaknesses vis a vis each other and different orders. for example, someone examining present-day canada may tend to dismiss the religious order in the overall pattern of power but historically it has had_an enormous effect, particularly in ouebec, but elsewhere as well, in helping to shape the current orders. in quebec it could be argued that the church was important in retarding indigenous capitalism but effective in increasing the power of the strte and unions vis a vis capital. the impact of religion thus could be detected only through a historical analysis.* thus the call for a 'canadian sociology 1 is not meant as a replacement for the 'classical tradition'** in sociology; exticular society as a whole? what are its essential components and how are they related to one another? how does it differ from other varieties of social order? within it, what is the meaning of any particular feature for its continuance and for its chance? (2) where does this society stand in human history? what are the mechanics by which it is changing? what is its place within and its meaning for the development of humanity as a whole? how does any particular feature we are examining affect, and how is it affected by, the historical period in which it moves? and this period—what are its essential features? how does it differ from other period? what are its characteristic ways of history-making? (3) what varieties of men and women now prevail in this society and in this period? and what varieties are coming to prevail? in what ways are they selected and formed, liberated and repressed, made sensitive and blunted? what kinds of 'human nature' are revealed in the conduct and character we observe in this society in this period? and what is the meaning for 'human nature' of each and every feature of the society we are examining?" (1959:6-7). •see hubert cuindon's, "the social evolution of quebec reconsidered" (1964: 154ff) . "for an important collection of some major works in the 'classical tradition' of sociology, see c. wright mills (editor), images actly the opposite. it is the application of classical approaches, such as those used by marx and weber, to macrosociological issues of canadian society. it is within the tradition of 'holistic' analysis which maintains that the whole cannot be reconstructed from the parts; the parts can only be understood in light of the whole. rather than a separate focus on theory and methodology, it calls for a reflexive relationship between theorv and research and the development of sociologies at several levels of analysis, especially as the/ relate to one another, including an understanding of the past, toeling for the present and an eye to the future. a 'canadian sociology' approach is consistent with what irving zeitlin sees as the main task of theory construction, 'a problem oriented approach to social science'. he argues th3t, "if one is generally interested in empirical social systems, one ought to have questions a^out thcii workings that one would like to answer. to do this, oie does n< t begin with 'society' in the abstract but with a specific society (or several of them) and with an interesting problem" (1973:23). one major guiding question t^r a 'canadian sociology' already posed is how do major inequalities such as class, regionalism, ethnicity education, occupation, income distribution, foreign control, etc., affect and reinforce one another? of the few national society studies now available, most seem to present their analysis around a particular theme or euidinc value. ralf dahrendorf writes in 'is society and democracy in germany that "the analysis of total societies requires an attempt to relate the structures of mi=ny specific areas of society to an underlying political problem" (1967:ix). he identifies his problem as follows: good analyses of total c ocieties require... a problem that removes all s'. <*tements from the tedious fog of arbitrariness an i provides the whole with a beginning and an end. tocqueville had a problem of this kind: 'democracy , however, we mean something different from tocque\ille, to wit, liberte rather than 6gal ite , a liberal political community rather than an egalitarian society (viii). there need not bei agreement with the particular problem of liberty chosen by darendorf but few would disagree that this is a of man , george braziller: new york (i960], where he says, "classteal sociology contains an enormous variety of conception, value, and method, and its relevance to the life-ways of the individual and to the ways of history-making in our epoch is obvious and immediate. this is why it is central to contemporary cultural work, and among the most valuable legacies of western civilization" (17) 10 macro level problem and an interesting guiding question. in the vertical mosaic , john porter also uses a guiding, theme, that or* inequal i ty , aimed at the image of a 'middle class society'. similar problems are posed by sol encel in his equal ity and authority: a study of class, status and power in aus tralia ! these are also some of! the types of problems which could be posed by a 'canadian soc iology' --problems not constrained by either theory or methodology, but problems which use theories and methodologies to resolve problems. as c. wright mills has said, "for the classical social scientists, neither method nor theory is an autonomous domain; methods are methods for some range of problems; theories are theories for some range of phenomenon" (1959:121).* the first task of the analyst is to provide the macro problem whether these are liberty, equality, democracy, efficiency or whatever will depend on each researcher's values. as has been argued, one of the most important units of analysis is the nation state within which is encompassed a national society**. within this framework the focus is on major structural components and their relationships as they interact to form the whole. many macro studies have used the nation state as a unit of comparative analysis but this is not the same as analysing a national society. stein rokkan has pointed to what he calls the "whole nation bias" in comparative studies and the weakness inherent in taking aggregates rather than components. he says, "most comparisons have been limited •following this, mills offers some advice to those concerned about substantive problems: "in actual practice, every working social scientist must be his own methodologist and his own theorist, which means only that he must be an intellectual craftsman. every craftsman can of course learn not much more than a general kind of awareness" (1959:121), going on to add that, "the classic focus, in short, is on substantive problems. the character of these problems limits and suggests the methods and the conceptions that are used and how they are used" (128). **a case for using the nation state as the key level of analysis is made by c.w. mills, "in our period, social structures are usuallv organized under a political state. in terms of power, and in many other interesting terms as well, the most inclusive unit of social structure is the nation-state. the nation-state is now the dominating form in world history and, as such, a major fact in the life of every man.... in choosing the national social structure as our generic working unit, we are adopting a suitable level of eenerality: one that enables us to avoid abandoning our problems and yet to include the structural forces obviously involved in many details and troubles of human conduct today. moreover, the choice of national social structures enables us most readily to take ud the 11 to institutional or aggregate statistical data for each nation as a unit and have tended to neglect highly significant variations in the rates of growth among competing economic, political or cultural centres and between such centres and the rural peripheries" (1970:49). in other words, to overcome the "whole nation bias" in comparative studies requires the apriori analysis of the national society which in turn may then be compared in terms of the types of relationships found within the national society and the processes* of developing to this stage. it may seem unusual that a paper on canadian society would have this concern about comparative studies but it is to be understood that each nation has its differences as well as similarities and much can be learned from these. indeed, c. wright mills has noted, "it is only by comparative studies that we can become aware of the absence of certain historical phases from a society, which is often quite essential to understanding its contemporary shape" (1959:157). moreover, it is not merely a theoretical or academic exercise but many canadians themselves engage in just such comparisons—principally with the united states, but with europe and other industrialized nations as well, although typically limiting these to other liberal democracies. aside from the outstanding work of john porter, there are only a handful oi sociologists in english-speaking canada who have taken a total or national society approach--such as, at times, s.d. clark, kasper naegele, a . k. davis and, to some extent, frank vallee and don whyte. but in quebec there are many more, such as hubert guindon, maurice pinard, guy rocher, marcel rioux, jean-charles falardeau, jacques dofny, gerald fortin, phillipe garigue, pioneer quebec sociologist leon geerin and fernand dumont,** to name but a few. as suggested earlier, major issues of public concern, for it is within and between the nation-states of the world that the effective means of power, and hence to a considerable extent of history-making, are now, for better or worse, tightly organized" (1959:135). •john porter has commented, "there is no comparative analysis, for example, when six scholars produce separate papers on the educational systems of six different countries. each study may as well have been published separately rather than bound together since they draw nothing from each other" (1970a: 144). the same, of course, may be said for readers which are called canadian society but lack any internal unity aside from the common subject matter of canada. they might more appropriately be called 'sociologies of canada'. **see especially dumont's, "the systematic study of french-canadian total society" (original, 1962) along with the 14 articles in the section on 'sociological interpretations on the social evolution of french canada', 'economic structure and social stratification 1 and 'social organization and culture' in marcel rioux and yves martin (cds.), french-canadian society (1964). see also nock (1974). 12 however, quebec sociologists have limited themselves to a 'total society' analysis of quebec and have not engaged in a 'national society' analysis of canada. these contributions cannot be minimized because they represent necessary starting points, but their lead must be expanded, elaborated and developed if a reasonable sociological understanding of canadian society is to be achieved. this emphasis, it needs to be stressed, is not parochial. it should be seen as a necessary requisite to national comparative analysis, as rokkan suggested above. ncr should it be abstracted from sociological theories and methodologies developed elsewhere; rather, these should be adapted to the canadian experience, if and when they fit. vallee and whyte, in their paper "canadian society: trends and perspectives", have argued that "sociologists are too busy making up for the backlog of sheer information about canadian society to worry about the enterprise as a whole and to engage in much soul-searching concerning the theoretical and methodological aspects of this enterprise" (1968:849). in terms of the distinction presented earlier, they are arguing that most of what has been occurring is a 'sociology of canada' rather than a 'canadian sociology'. in fact, they argue that, with a few notable exceptions, "canadian sociologists have rarely adopted a holistic perspective, one in which the system-as-a-whole is the universe of study" (849).* this does not mean that every piece of research must cover all aspects of canadian society and address every issue. it does mean that regardless of the particular focus of study--be it ethnicity, regionalism, immigration, class, or whatever--a central question is what this means for the national society, that is, how each part relates to the whole. similarly, it is important to stress again that the focus on a national society suggests that the differences with in society are important as differences between one society and* others. thus ethnic differences, regional splits and class relations within canada go a long way to understanding that society. at the same time aspects such as these cannot be abstracted from an analysis of canada's international context. this means more than simply a 'comparative perspective', which itself is interesting and informative, but an international framework of analysis placing canada's internal developments in the context of external ones. •similarly, a.k. davis argues, "by and large anglophone academic sociology in canada has failed to present a realistic and holis' tic picture of the evolution of canadian society" fl*>7f>:31). 13 some frameworks for the study of national societies* (i) regional power relationship frameworks recently there have emerged some frameworks, developed mainly for latin america's relationship with advanced capitalist nations, based on regional power relationships. these models integrate both national and international dimensions and are built on both a national society and total system perspective. that is, they analyse each nation state in terms of the indigenous regional and class power structures while simultaneously analysing the relationships between these structures and external centers of power. central to all of these models is an unequal relationship between interdependent units which form a set of asymmetrical associations either within national societies or between nation states.** according to andre gunder frank and his 'development of underdevelopment' model, "contemporary underdevelopment is in large part the historical product of past and continuing econ*in the canadian corporate elite (1975:345-353), i d i ?cussed a national society framework which will not be presenttd here, except to say ralph miliband's distinction between the state system and political system suggests a fruitful organizing framework. **barrington moore, jr., although applying an interesting analytical scheme to various societies, is a suoject to a 'large society bias'. he writes, "the fact that smaller countries depend economically and politically on big and powerful ones means that the decisive causes of their politics lie outside their own boundaries. it also means that their political problems are not really comparable to those of larger countries" (1966:xiii). is canada a 'small country' in moore's terms? in some respects, but not in all, nor is it an underdeveloped nation, nor totally politically or economically dependent. but it is also not a 'large country' in international terms. the 'decisive causes' are not totally outside canada and to the extent they are, it is in large part a result of internal policy or non-policy, as the case may be. theda skocpal has made a similar point in her critique of moore, emphasizing the relationship between "intersocietal" and "intrasocietal structures and processes", suggesting his focus is intrasocietal. she writes, "variations of ultimate political outcomes of the modernizing process (moore's dependent variable) are explained by a combination of the strength of the 'commercial impulse' and the type of class structure through which its effects are channeled ... .moore was anxious to establish his cases as societies free from 'foreign influences'. but, of course, no society is free from foreign influences, and, in his case accounts, moore is repeatedly forced to refer to 'external' conditions or events in order to explain 'internal' states or chanc es" ("a critical review of barrington moore's, social origins of dictatorship and democracy", politics and society, vol. 4, no. 1. 1973:28-29). l 14 omic and other relations between the satellite underdeveloped and now developed metropolitan countries" (1969:4). the model is not restricted to international relations; rather, it attempts to link internal developments to relationships within as well as outside of nations, or what he refers to as "a whole chain of constellations of metropoles and satellites" (6). his central hypothesis is that "within this world-embracine metropolis-satellite structure the metropoles tend to develod and the satellites to underdevelop" (9). in other words, there is a chain of exploitive relations between various levels from the local to' the regional to the national and international which serve to accumulate power and resources at the highest levels and drain them from the lowest. johan galtung presents a variation on the themes of prank. he begins, as did frank, by focusing on "inequality within and between nations" and specifically analyses the interactive relations contained therein. the key linking or mediating mechanism he defines as ".coupling" which means "some type of social causation in interaction relations and interaction structure" (1971:83). using the imagery of 'center' and 'periphery'*, galtung argues "there is a disharmony of interest between the center nation [metropolitan nationj as a whole and the periphery nation [satellite nationj as a whole" but maintains that this misses an important refinement "because it blurs the harmony of interest between the two centers, and leads to the belief that imperialism is merely an international relationship, not a combination of intraand inter-national relations" (84). the key mediating party in the galtung model is the "bridgehead" in the center of the periphery nation. inequality results from the way interaction takes place and can be identified in terms of sets of elites. in what he calls the "multinational, asymmetric stage", galtung argues, "elites have emerged in the periphery nations, strongly identified with and well harmonizing with the center elites" (96). one final refinement galtung introduces has particular relevance to canada and that is the 'go-between' status of some nations, mediating between center and periphery nations in much the same way the center in the periphery nation mediates in the general model (104) because of the type of imagery used, a problem with the regional power structure models is their emphasis on geographical distinctions rather than class distinctions; for example, the bourgeoisie may be located in metropolitan areas but so is much of the proletariat. while keeping the overall perspective •the terms 'periphery' and 'center' as images of international economic relations have been used since at least 1949 by raul prebish in his the economic development of latin america and its principal probl erns" ]j siew york , united nations department of social and economic affairs, 1950:1 (original published in spanish in 1949). 15 of international relationships and their intra-nat ional implications, recent analysts have paid much more attention to the class structures within these nations and have argued that some elements of these class structures have become ' internationalized' . these types of analyses norman girvan has classified as "historical/ institutional/structural" approaches.* the most impressive example of such an approach is the work of osvaldo sunkel in "transnational capitalism and national disintegration in latin america". using five inter-related concepts of "development, underdevelopment, dependence, marginality and spatial imbalances", sunkel argues: a realistic analysis of latin america development should therefore be based on a conception which assumes our socio-economic system to be formed by two groups of structural elements: internal and external. among the internal factors are: the pattern of natural resources and population; political institutions, especially the state; sociopolitical groups and classes; the ideologies and attitudes of different groups and classes; the specific policies followed by the government; etc. the complex of internal and external structural elements, and the interrelations among them, define the structure of the system, and constitute, therefore, the framework within which the functioning of the national system and its processes of structural transformations take place (1973:135). more specifically, there are three dimensions of the analysis-' process, structure and system--whereby "it is postulated that underdevelopment is part and parcel of the historical process of global development of the international svstem, and therefore, that underdevelopment and development are simply two faces of one single universal process" (135-136). the most recent phase in these relationships maintains the overall structural asymmetry between nations but now that they have become "ever more closely integrated— it is necessary to take into account that this new model of international economic relations is based operationally on the transnational conglomerate, a new kind of business organization that has experienced an enormous growth during the last decades" (139). there now appears an "internationalized" sector in both the center and periphery nations built on the institution of the multinational corporation. for the periphery nation this likely means that "international mobility will correspond to the internal •for an important overview of the types of analysis which have been performed in third world countries, see girvan's, "the development of dependency f.conomics in the caribbean and latin america: review and comparison", social and economic studies , vol. 22, no. 1 (1973: 1-33) . 16 nobility particularly between the internationalized sectors of developed and under-developed countries, which, as we have indicated before, constitute the nucleus of the international capitalist system, and, therefore, probably also constitutes an international market for skilled resources" (170). sunkel's model thus focuses on developments within center and periphery nations but, in addition, adds an international category because of his 'global perspective'. from this wider perspective, analogous with the continental system between canada and the united states, two basic components can be identified: a) a complex of activities, social groups and regions in different countries which conform to the develooed part of the global system and which are closely linked transnationally through many concrete interests as well as by similar styles, ways and levels of living and cultural affinities; b) a national complement of activities, social groups and regions partially or totally excluded from the national developed part of the global system and without any links with similar activities, groups and regions of other countries (146) . thus the imagery used by sunkel is of a "transnational kernel or nucleus" at the "heart" of the international system which tends to be integrated plus national segments which tend to be "segregated or marginal" to the core of the dominant national and international system. the importance of these segregated sectors in both the center and periphery is their relationship with the transnational integrated sectors in terms of the types of demands they may make and conflicts which may occur. it is important to recognize that in sunkel's model class relationships are of crucial importance but do not correspond to the ' integrated-marginalized ' dichotomy. rather, there is a 'core' of international capitalism into which some segments of the periphery bourgeoisie, middle class and a portion of the working class or even agricultural classes are incorporated while some parts of all classes are marginalized. there is still an overall international hierarchy between nations based on an asymmetrical relationship but above this is an integrated multinational segment 'transcending' this in an international capitalist system. the effect of integrating galtung's idea of 'go-between' nations with sunkel's 'integrated and marginalized' segments of the class structures of center and periphery nations means that a rather integrate model of international and internal economic relations could be developed. mediating between the various structural components of the model would be the institution of the multinational corporation and the elites who control them 17 and others who work for them. to turn this general model into a theory of international and regional capitalism would require a great deal of empirical work but as a guide to this system requires a model somewhat more developed than that for latin american nations because of canada's unique role of mediator for foreign controlled capital plus its own foreign investment and the extensive foreign investment within canada itself.* although there has been some discussion of various regional power structure frameworks within canada, very little empirical work has actually been done. what has been undertaken is at the level of the frank 'development of underdevelopment' thesis and not in terms of more recent models such as c-altune's or sunkel's. mel watkins, for instance, suggests using a "center-margin framework" similar to frank's model for examining the national bourgeoisie and "its relationship of dependency or independence with respect to the imperial business class or the imperial bourgeoisie" (1970:35). in so doing, he recognizes the importance of the "metropolis-satellite chian" used by frank (37-39), arguing that in the international framework, "canada would lie above the line as one of the exnloiting nations rather than an exploited nation" (40). but at the same time the internal relationships must also be taken into account and it is in this context that arthur k. davis' paper, "caradian society and history as hinterland versus metropolis" (1971), is important**. however, these humble beginnings have led to very little in the way of model building or theories, not to mention the absence of empirical research. while this is somewhat better in the case of regional analysis within canada, there is virtually nothing published about the continental context . *** •see wallace clement, "the canadian bourgeoise: merely comprador?", a paper presented at the marxist study institute, toronto, feb., 1975 and the section on "absentee ownership and 'linkages'" at the end of the next section. **the importance of the boundaries selected for study is also noted by keyfitz when he writes, "if we study any institution in canada, for example, trade unions or an automobile plant, our conclusions will come out one way if we treat it as autonomous, as though anv links with the united states can be disregarded, and another way if we treat it as part of a larger continental entity" (1974:34). ***to comprehend the nature of the relationship between canada and the united states at any given time, it is necessary to understand what is happening within each. milner and milner are amonc the few who have actually practiced this, writing, "the united states behaves toward other nations in ways which are to a great extent a reflection and outgrowth of the economic structures and social system inside its borders... in order to understand many of the most important aspects of everyday experience in quebec, we must understand 18 these frameworks have a particular promise for canadian social science as models because they reflect a centralist tradition important in canada's development, particularly in terms of its early colonial links and the early development of central canada as exemplified in innis's staple theory and the lower/creighton 'laurentian thesis'. each has been built on an analysis of structural power links binding them into a whole founded on geography, regionalism, and resource extraction. one of the differences between most elite models, such as that used by john porter in the vertical mosaic , and the regional power structure frameworks outlined here is the force of opposition built into the latter. they see the relationship as one of running conflict whereby canadians are placed in a 'doublebind' between the united states and canadian business interests, both of whom have turned toward the regional hinterlands for their surplus extraction. replicated in canada are the beginnings of a model of a national society in its international context.* although these have not as yet been developed sufficiently or applied adequately to canadian society, there are clearly beginnings in this direction. many more specifications are required in such a model, some of which are suggested in the international models, before it can address some particular characteristics of canadian society. it would seem important to specify more clearlv the dimensions such as regionalism, class or ethnicity being analysed and recognizing some of the differences and clusterings which may occur. for instance, there may be an important difference in french-english relations with respect to the economic domain as compared to the state. indeed, this has recently been shown to be the case (clement and olsen, 19741. also, the links between various levels must be more clearly specified and the mechanisms of mediation examined more carefully. furthermore, the relationships between the various 'parties' in both the 'center' and 'periphery' must be examined more thoroughly. this means, for instance, examining relations based on economic and state power in terms of the ethnicity of the power holders and their regional location. it may be that there is uniformity within the 'center' but diversity in the •periphery' which affects the types of resistences davis suggests should exist. finally, the international dimension must be explored more thoroughly for the internal implications of some of the crucial facts of life in the united states--beg inning with its internal class structure and the culture which sustains this structure" (1973:9). •while the international context has been stressed here, internal relations can also be examined within this model. for example, frank vallee notes, "one cannot understand situations and trends among the native people without taking into account the nonnative people who form part of the social environment" (1171:149) 19 these structures. these preliminary points arising from various regional power structure models may prove useful in the attempt to develop a 'canadian sociology' . they would clearly allay any criticism of such an undertaking as parochial. indeed, they would bring the analysis of canada into an international framework in a more meaningful fashion than could anv series of 'sociologies of canada'--or traditional comparative studies—because they demand that relations between various institutions in canada and other national societies be specified, not simply as they compare. for example, rather than comnaring political, judicia], economic, or educational institutions and policies in 'canada, the united states and the united kingdom, the researcher would ask what implications the institutions and policies of one nation have for others--both in terms of models that have been adapted after being established in one place as well as the impact of policies and institutions from other nations and their implications for the nation under study*. some of these questions will be returned to later but first the consociational democracy model will be examined. (ii) consociational democracy there has been an attempt to present a model of certain types of nationa*. societies characterized as 'segmented' in terms of ethnicity, religion, language, or political .tructure. this approach has been presented and applied specifically to canada and other nations in a collection of papers edited by kenneth mcrae, consociational democracy: political accomoda tion in segmented societies (1974). although variously called "segmented plural ism" , and "contradictarian democracy", mcrae suggests that the term "consociational democracy' is most convenient (3-4) . he distinguishes three perspectives in the general consociational literature: 1) as a pattern of social structure, emphasizing the degree of religious, ideological, cultural or linguistic segmentation in the society itself; 2) as a pattern of elite behavior and mass-elite relationships emphasizing the processes of decision-making and conflict regulation; 3) as an underlying characteristic of the political culture arising from historical circumstances that may antedate the period of mass politics (5) . mcrae* s summary of the literature suggests that one element stands out as most important and is a prerequisite for a society being 'on the relationship between 'endogenous' and 'outside* factors on development, see giddens (1973:265). 20 considered consociat ional ; he says, "the cleavage in question should be sufficiently intensive and durable to rive members of the respective groups a distinctive and persistent outlook or cultural orientation that is different from that of other sectors, a raison d'etre for maintaining organized segmentation" (6). underlying the entire model, but not made explicit, is the assumption that these cleavages will become organized and be manifest in the political system so as to stabilize the society as a whole. this is apparent, for example, in lijphart's definition: "consoc iat ional democracy means government by elite cartel designed to turn a democracy with a fragmented political culture into a stable democracy" (1974:79). while the model explicitly deals with cleavages based on regional, religious, linguistic and ideological splits, it does not attempt to incorporate social classes as possible subcultures. similarly, the consociat ional model stresses the role of the political system but does not take into account others such as the bureaucratic, economic, labour, or mass media in terms of representing population segments. mcrae has made a cautioned application of the consociat ional model to canada, albeit limited to the political system hecause of the bias contained within the general model. his main findings are that, "the primary lines of segmentation in canada are difficult to identify with precision on account of (.sicj the reinforcing but not completely overlapping effects of province, language and religion", especially because there is not one government in canada but eleven, including the provinces and federal government thus creating a "distorting forum" for the segments. using a comparative method to place canada's segmentation in a relative position to 'classic' segmented societies, the results are "inconclusive" since "by any of these criteria province, religion and language canada must he ranked significantly lower". probably most significant, given the political orientation of the model, is his finding that "because of the nature of the party system and the electoral system, modern political parties in canada have not divided alon^ any of the axes of subcultural cleavage—accommodations between subcultures must take place within the governing party" (260-261). while there may be some resemblance between canada and the consociational model, it does not adequately explain developments even within the political system. some of the preconditions for the development of a consociat ional political system mav in fact exist but they have not become organized and represented in the political system in the way the consociat ional model suggests. in his book, elite accommodation in canadian politics (1973), robert presthus has adopted a consoc iat ional approach , part icularly as developed by lijphart. his use of the model, however, is more metaphoric than real because he adapts it to the study of interest groups rather than the study of cleavages based on so21 cial segments. in fact, what he does abstract from the general model are those elements related to "elite accommodation" as "an integral part of the larger process of national integration" (4). this is simply another way of saying "elite pluralism" (see bachrach, 1967). but what is made quite explicit in presthus' analysis is that he regards this not only as a desirable way to organize a 'democratic' society but as the only way. he says, "elite accommodation may be regarded as a structural requisite of any democratic society in which political decisions are the result of negotiation and consultation among the elites concerned ... -.el ite accommodation is inherent in the process of democratic government" (4). while presthus' account of "elite accommodation" may be an interesting ideology* as a "way to overcome pervasive modern schisms between labour and capital, social classes, and indeed, between government and the governed" (25), it is not an adequate base upon which to build a theory or model of the way canadian society operates. it is subject to the same limitations mcrae pointed out for the consociational model and confines the analysis to the role of the state system, virtually ignoring the operation of other power domains in the society and not providing any insight into such issues as regionalism or class structures.** while the consociational model does not address sufficient issues necessary to develop a 'canadian sociology' it does provide at least some potential in terms of the two major segments of canadian society. these are the 'two nations' of french and english canada. language, religion, political units and regional centralization are all elements serving to reinforce this major cleavage, as is economic position and, at least to some extent, political parties with the liberals dominant in quebec and the conservatives and ndp almost totally absent. however, the issue of social class is not integrated in the model and for this it is necessary to turn to a long standing debate over the place of the concepts 'class 1, 'nation' and 'ethnicity' in canadian society. (iii) the problems of class, nation and ethnicity*** although the theoretical debate has been centered mainly in quebec, the issue has relevance for all of canadian society, *see, for example, w.l. mackenzie king's, industry and humanity . macmillan: toronto, 1913. **in a highly critical reveiw of the book, john meisel has noted that presthus introduces the idea of elite accommodation but fails to integrate it, saying, "the book makes only a marginal contribution to this still open issue", canadian forum , may-june, 1974:44-46. ***this question will be discussed again shortly in terms of dominant issues in canadian society. hubert guindon's work, especially "two cultures: an essay on nationalism, class, and ethnic tension" (1968), as john porter's extensive analysis has demonstrated. bourque and laurin-frer.ette h3ve analysed the relation between the concents 'class' and 'nation' within quebec, raintaining that "a diversified class structure has existed within the two nations present in quebec's social format ion ... the stri-.ctuve <'.oes not prevent, on the one hand, the collaboration between the elates whose members are in the main from different nations, and on the other hand, the class struggle, within e^ch nation". while they see the two concepts as related they are by no means identical, nor should they be merged into such hvbrids as 'ethnicclass'. they define and analyse the concepts as fellows: an ethnic group forming a single dominated social class cannot therefore constitute a nation. we can only analyse it as a social class within the social formation and, in the case of the capitalist mode of production, the nation to which it belongs. in the case of an ethnically differentiated class, the ethnic character may be the vestigial result of another social formation; an earlier social formation in the case oi conquest; another nation, where large-scale emigration is involved (1972: 192) . the distinction _s put more simply by stanlev p.yerson when he says, "the concepts of class anil nation are not equatable. classes enbody relationships of property and work, in the context of a mode of product ion .. .nat ion-communi ty embodies an identity linguistic and cultural, that is not simply an 'effect' of class, however closely its evolution may he interwoven with the shifting patterns of class relations" (1972 : 224 ) . for some time now, quebec sociologists have been relating the issues of class and nation to a total society analysis. more than other sociologists in canada, they have ilso given a 'richer' meaning to the concept of class.* this can be seen, for exairple, in the use given the term by dofny and xioux: on the role of the middle class in french canada is a total society analysis which takes into account its larger context and the interplay between 'class' and 'nation'. tie clearly relates class developments and political movements within the context of ethnic differentiation. see also maurice pinard's paper on this topic, "working class politics: an interpretation of the quebec case", canadian review of sociology and anthropology , vol. 7, no. 2 (may 1970) . •contrast dofnv and rioux with porter's use of class (1965:9:s). 23 the concept of social class is intrinsically related to the concept of 'total society'; unless social and cultural phenomena are placed in the context of the total society, there is the risk of confusing social classes with groups based on occupation or socio-economic interests ... .social classes are very large groups, real rather than nominal, that appear in those societies where the economic structure predominates and determines the congruence between the other sub-systems of the society. these groups we call -social classes are mainly differentiated according to economic inequalities. social classes appear in heterogeneous societies and tend to form subcultures, in other words, cultural systems which are relatively coherent (1964:307-308). later dofny and rioux raise the problem of the "truncated" nature of the class system in quebec, a problem also raised by rocher when he speaks of "a double system of classes, permeating each other at certain leve'ls, but relatively autonomous in relation to each other" (1964:336). while porter is generally noted for his 'nominal' use of the term class, it is apparent in the following comment on quebec that he iz using the term as more than statistical categories. he says, "because british and french live as largely separate groups there are two class systems, each bearing the stamp of its own culture. both french and british have their old aristocratic families as well as their lower classes. however, these two class systems while operating side by side are also firmly interlocked in the economic system" (1165:91). unfortunately, there has not been a major attempt to provide a class analysis for the national society in the way this has been done for quebec. leo johnson's article (1972) is the closest there is to analysing classes as large, active groups on a national scale. this may be because they are not real or associational groups on this level but research has not been done to either confirm or deny this. aside from their importance in terms of 'class' and 'nation' , what is important in the way these concepts have been related analytically is the use of a historical perspective. this is particularly true for bourque and laurin-frenette, ryerson and guindon, but is also evident in porter, who says, "to understand the interplay between ethnic inequalities and class inequalities it is important to look at how ethnic differentiation within a society develops. in most historical instances it has been through conquest or migration" (1974:5). porter differs from others mentioned in one other important respect; he analyses the relationship between 'ethnicity' and 'class' 2k rather than 'nation' and 'class'.* this allows him to deal more broadly with canadian society as a whole because it extends the analysis to cover 'third' ethnic groups, representing about one quarter of the canadian population. a recent book by david hughes and evelyn kallen, the ana tomy of racism: canadian dimensions (1974), has expanded^ trie study of ethnicity well beyond earlier attempts. although they begin with one central problem, that of racism in canada, they expand their analysis to include a wide range of inter-related phenomenon, such as conquest, immigration, individual, institutional and structural racism, ethnic group boundaries, the role of education, religion and language, and the effect of state policies, as they affect and are affected by their central problem. of particular note is the way they are able to relate ethnicity and power, privilege and prestige in canada in a wav not evident since the vertical mosaic . hughes and kallen systematically deal with many problems at the core of a 'canadian sociology' by searching out the linkage between inequalities in each of these phenomenon. thus there are two fairly distinct issues; one concerning the place of quebec in confederation and another the relationship between class and other relatively fragmented eihnic eroups the first may be analysed in terms of conquest; the second is better understood in terms of selective migration and other factors . to summarize this discussion before examining some dominant issues in canadian society, it may be said that there is much that is suggestive in regional power struggle models, the consoc iat ional democracy model and the "class ''nation' distinction but they have not been developed into what could be called a model of canadian society. a number of sub-theories or models are available in the literature but they have not been brought together into a coherent and comprehensive 'canadian sociology ' . some issues in canadian society the preceding sections have discussed the idea of a 'canadian sociology' and some approaches which may prove useful in the attempt to develop this perspective. this final section will provide a few dominant issues (for illustrative purposes) which could be addressed in such an undertaking. the conclusion will provide some suggestions about how these issues could be related and expanded. •on the relationship between ethnicity, cultural groups and territory, see hughes and kallen (1974:88). (i) national identity and the social psychology of canadians the literature in canadian sociology on 'national identity 1 is probably more extensive than on any other single tonic*, particularly one at the national level, yet little consensus has emerged in terms of what this means in canada or -hat it? implications are for a 'canadian sociology'. some have argued canada is conservative because of its 'tory' origins and reiection of the american revolution, others that it is liberal because of its american orientation, still others that canadians are engaged in a love-hate relation with themselves and the united states. whatever the case may be, the 'national character 1 route to understanding canadian society seems a 'dead end' not a place to begin but a place to arrive. the onlv conclusion seems to be that there are a number of social forces affecting the way canadians act and believe. it seer.s -nore reasonable to first identify these social forces and the", address the consequences for the canadian consciousness. one of these social forces is ethnic diversity, the struggle between the french and english plus the ethnic pluralism of the other one quarter of the population. in the absence of alternative identities, the canadian state has pursued policies of ' biculturalism ' , and more recently, 'mult icul tural i? v , which serve to reinforce these atomized 'organized' mir orities . ' it is difficult to tell if these are identities arisinc from the canadian 'mosaic' or ideologies projected by the canadian state elite (see clement and olsen, 1974). sociologists themselves are not free from responsibility on this matter, as vallee and whyte have said: sociologists who have written on national character and values in canada have based their conclusions on impressions, introspection, and on inferences from such disparate sources as literature, historical developments, and statistics on a variety of subjects. the framework within which these studies are carried out and presented is almost always a comparative one in which canadians are •see, for example, kasper naegele (1968); s.d. clark (1974); george grant (1965); mildred schwartz (1967); j. m.s. careless (1969); john porter (1967, 1971, 1974); g. horowitz (1971); s. m. lipset (1964, 1971); don whyte (1973). ••examining the consequences of these policies porter says, "it really seems questionable that we seek our psychic shelters through ethnic identification. there is no doubt that ethnic groupings can play this role, but at the cost of perpetuating ethnic stratification" (1974:10). 26 viewed as not quite as american as the americans, not quite as british as the british, not quite as australian as the australians, not quite as french as the french. in this way, sociologists reinforce a folk impression of long standing that canada is a hyhrid product arid an intermediary between the united states and europe (1968:836). religion, ethnicity, linguistic groups, class, sex and region all compete with a sense of national identity but it seems an understanding of how and why these operate can best follow from the studv of the structure of canadian society. a study of regionalism using the framework outlined earlier would suggest some of the reasons why there are several identity references operating simultaneously. in the west, for example, there is one pull to central canada and another north-south pull to the united states. nations need not be monolithic or highly integrated; indeed, precisely the way the parts (be they ethnic, regional, class, etc.) relate to the whole is one of the most important and interesting variables. only very recently with the appearance of patricia marchak ' s ideological persp e ctive on canada has the weakness of the 'canadian character literature begun to be overcome an j this has been done by using a methodology different from the earlier studies. she has chosen to do her macrosocioloi;v of canada by counterposi ng "two versions of the canadian reality" --dominant and counter ideologies (1975:viff). the method is to contrast ideology and reality and see why some classes adopt one or another, and evaluate which 'fits' an understanding of canadian society. marchak is able to weave an analysis of history, class, nation, foreign ownership, sovereignty, regionalism, french canada, ethnicity, native peoples, sexual inequality, professions, unions, political parties, institutional arrangements--publ ic and private, education, wealth and income distribution into her theme of dominant and counter ideologies, and this is all done at the national society level. although they are not as yet related in such a way that it could be said that they constitute a model or theory of canadian society, the beginnings of such an attempt are apparent. an analysis using the regional power structure discussed earlier which attempted to integrate the findings of rex lucas' study, minetown, milltown, kail town , john porter's study of the national power structure anh other work on the international level* is another approach worth exploring. the number of such 'in a paper, "econfomic elites in ontario: a broader perspective on regionalism" (presented to the canadian studies institute, university of waterloo, november, l (->74), i attempted to show the linkages between the local, regional, national and international levels. this approach is particularly useful for illustrating the implications of broader powei structures on the day to day activitites of canal ians. 27 links as education, corporate control, regionalism, urban-rural migration, social mobility, unions anil others, are innumerable.* a study which tried to examine national identities based on these types of linkages would probably have more to say about how people develop 'identities' than those undertaken within the 'national identity' approach thus far. indeed, studies such as the impressive work of lucas have done a great deal to link the social psychological level of analysis into broader social forces and structures. it is likely that studies such as his or marchak's would be the primary way that a 'canadian sociology' approach could tap this level of analysis yet still retain its broad national focus. (ii) french canada as a hinterland model it was mentioned earlier that hubert guindon's analysis of french canada provides an analysis of a total society which could be expanded to the whole of canada. guindon links the "increase in the political and economic relevance of the provincial governments at the expense of the federal government" to changes which have occurred in the class structure of quebec (1968:33ff). this could also be related to postwar transformations in the prairies, particularly oil in alber*a, which have catalysed ;.imilar developments there.** althougi all of the parallels and points of analysis cannot be developed here, it is worthwhile to suggest some of the more obvious. guindon says, the vulnerability of the traditional elite set the stage for an easy introduction of industrialization even if it meant dependence on foreign capitalists. the capitalists transformed the french canadians into urban dwellers. to service the needs of the recently urbanized masses, the traditional power elite had to transform its institutions into large scale bureaucracies, giving birth in the process to the new middle class of french-canadian society (44). in these few sentences guindon has introduced and integrated a historical framework for the study of industrialization, bureaucratization, foreign investment, class transformations and the study of elites. later he discusses social mobility, saying, "french-canadian bureaucratic pyramids have a narrow base --geographically, socially, and organizat ionally--because of their small scale. this means that upward mobility is more re•these linkages will be returned to in the final section. *see john barr and owen anderson (editors), the unfinished revolt , mcclelland and stewart: toronto, 1971. stricted, less diversified, and less extended" (51). all of this resembles closely the experience of other regional hinterlands in canada.* it places the analysis within its canadian and international context, shows the limitations of attempting to create parallel mobility structures alongside dominant ones (and the need to do this because of exclusion from dominant ones) it explains the role local elites have in mediating with outside rower centers and where their interests are located. vallee and whyte have commented: compared to the total canadian nation-state, the distinctive entity called french-canadian societv is easy to grasp in its totality. the inter-dependence of the parts that make up the socio-political entity called quebec can be traced historically and synchronical ly in a way which it would be extremelv difficult to do for canada as a whole, except at the most abstract level (1968:850). perhaps it is not so much the size or complexity of canadian societv as the lack of attempting to develop such an approach anong english-speaking sociologists that explains this failure. surely the same ;ind of analysis can be done for the rest of canada; it even has the model of such analyses as guindon's to start with. . absentee ownership and 'linkages' since i have discussed the international setting of canada's economy elsewhere in "the changing structure of the canadian economy" (1974), only a few aspects of national level absentee ownership will be provided for illustrative purposes of some of the 'linkages' necessary to develop a 'canadian sociology'. canada's economy has two types of elites, comprador and indigenous, which are centered in relatively distinct economic sectors. the '.dor elites are the canadian counterpart of foreign controlled multinationals. in terms of the galtung model, they are the 'go-between' elites in the periphery nation. some modifications to this model are necessary because, in addition to the comprador or 'go-between' economic elites, there exist independent indigenous elites. aside from this amendment, the fragmented economic system in canada can be related to the fragmented political system, particularly in the context of the above re*the case studies of philip mathias', forced growth , james lewis and samuel: toronto, 1971 are interesting illustrations. all five cases are located within the weakest provinces. see also garth stevenson, "continental integration and canadian unity" in andrew airline, et al, editors, continental community ?, mcclelland and stewart: toronto, 1974. 29 marks on the relationship between foreign investment and regional hinterlands. that is, the fragmented political system has encouraged the development of foreign direct investment within various provinces which compete with each other thus encouraging differential patterns of growth between provinces and higher rates of foreign investment. this, in turn, has resulted in an increase in provincial power in the postwar period, particularly in the oil rich prairies, which has also weakened the federal system. these brief remarks suggest that it is important to establish relationships between various developments a*nd places them within their international context. absentee ownership on the national level has had important economic, political and regional implications but these represent only one side of the relationship. if the full implications for a 'canadian sociology' are to be explored, then other aspects must also be taken into account. absentee ownership may be defined in terms of the distance from a particular center, similar to the metropolis-hinterland chain discussed earlier. the boundaries under consideration must be specified; for example, at the national level foreign ownership is absentee and the economic boundaries do not coincide with the nation state. on the community or regional level, absentee ownership refers to the branches of firms which are not locally owned but are part of larger corporations, themselves either canadian or foreign owned. the consequences of foreign ownership at the national level and local level exhibit similar characteristics, including lack of autonomy from outside control and decision-making, withdrawal of capital and resources, as well as a higher degree of uncertainty about the continuation of the branch plant at both levels since by definition they are peripheral to the overall operation. another consequence of importance is the effect on the class structure and mobility of the indigenous population, either local or national. with a branch plant system, management is typically recruited outside the community and frequently transferred thus creating a system of 'transient managers'. this means local people have a lower probability of upward mobility and participation within this type of structure. on the national level the matter is more complex. if management is brought in from outside, as has often been the case in the past, the opportunity structure for indigneous canadians is blocked. however, if foreign firms recruit within canada to fill these positions, this opens the possibility for middle class canadians who are university educated. given the high degree of blockage which occurs within canadian controlled firms, this may be desirable from the perspective of individual mobility, but must be weighted against other consequences of absentee ownership suggested above plus the fact that this may be a way that indigenous entrepreneurial talent is drained off within canada, thus inhibiting the creation of indigneously controlled activity. 30 in some respects it does make a difference whether the absentee owners are canadian or foreign. these would be with respect to the retention of profits within canada which could be used to expand industrial activity thus creating greater surplus and more jobs. it would also mean that many of the secondary and tertiary spin-offs such as technological development could be supported and encouraged within canada. being based within canada may also mean the firms would be subject to greater regulation by the canadian state. in other respects it makes little difference whether the branch plant is canadian or foreign controlled, particularly for the regional or local level. in either case the major access points to occupational mobility, the major accumulation of surplus, and the sources of decision-making, occur outside the area. the community or region within which the branch plant is located is equally vulnerable to decisions taken at head office, be it in toronto or new york. this discussion is the result of taking several levels of analysis such as the local or regional level represented by rex lucas' minetown, mill town , rail town , john porter's analysis of national economic elites and tying them all together in a variation of regional power structure model. while tnis discussion is very brief and only illustrative, as well as being confined mainly to economic dimensions, it does provide some indication of the type of analysis that could be developed into a national society framework. the key analytical points are in the linking mechanisms between each level and a concern with the entire scope of the society, including the frequently missing local level. several other types of analyses could be provided which link external and internal developments; for example, the relationship between immigration and retaining a french-speaking population base for the purposes of political power as evident in the recent bill 22 controversy in quebec or the relationship between foreign control of industry, the occupational structure of the labour force and the implications this has for postindust rial ism. while these cannot be developed here, they give some indication of other types of studies which could be related to a national society analysis. conclusion the future of canadian sociology will depend upon its keepin? up with current trends and being able to place them within the context of the national society. in canada there is a double dilemma of trying to catch up empirically and theoretically by developing the basis for a 'canadian sociology' while at the sane time staying abreast of current developments and remaining relevant. moreover, there are many areas that have been almost totally neglected, not only in a substantive sense hut in the sense of the types of perspectives used in the analysis. for 31 example, there has never been in canada a macrosoc iological approach by a marxist on the scale of, say, charles ii. anderson (1974) for the united states, although elements of such an analysis exist such as leo .johnson (1972) on the decline of the petite bourgeoisie or in some respects davis' metropolishinterland analysis (1971) following the town-country dichotonv in marx. more work needs to be done even with existing studies. for instance, an important undertaking would be tying the analysis of class, power and elites together empirically; put crudely, this means tying part i of the vertical mosaic , 'the structure of class", into part ii, 'the structure of power', by maintaining the national perspective and adding an historical analvsis. there do exist a number of theories, models or at least themes about the nature of canadian society, some of which have already been mentioned. porter, for instance, has identified the relationship between class, power and ethnicity, and this has now been expanded by hughes and kallen; a.k. davis' hinterland-metropolis relationship based on regional inequalities; a. richmond's relationship between immigration and ethnic inequalities, following, in part, from porter's 'two stream model' of migration; leo johnson's changing occupational structure and the decline of the petite bourgeoisie; pat marchak's two competing versions of social reality; and i have suggested the relationship between foreign and indigneous economic development . together, and with others, it may be possible to form these into a 'canadian sociology 1 . social life is highly complex and experiments in types of societies have been varied. the task of social studies is to 'make sense 1 out of the variety of experiences and experimentations by identifying major processes, structures and relationships. therefore, the study of canadian society can and should be approached from a number of perspectives, using a variety of methodologies and data sources. but ultimately, to have relevance for the study of the national society, they have to be tied into an overriding framework and presumably be aimed at a common concern--such as improving the lot of canadians, which could mean being concerned about the decline of inequalities of all sorts and the increase and redistribution of the society's resources. it has been argued that the focus of a 'canadian sociology' should be on an array of substantive problems in canadian society but these in turn must also be worked out in terms of the priorities of each researcher. this means an evaluation of what are considered important or significant social issues and concerns, an analysis of them and reporting these results. the process of reporting to other scholars and the public is intended to have others re-examine what they consider to be social issues and to re-order their priorities accordingly. this goal would be one of the major tasks of such an undertaking, and one of its most important rewards. 32 one important question remains: is there a uniqueness to canadian society that makes it a valuable topic beyond its intrinsic interest to its residents? the answer offered in this paper has been in the affirmative. canada lends itself for comparison to probably a wider range of nations than does any other single country. it encompasses a number of problems such as its industrial development, ethnic diversity and regionalism, comparable with, yet distinct from, other countries. its rolr as a 'mediator' or 'go-between' generates a number of unique internal developments different from most other nations. for these reason's and more, it seems a worthwhile undertaking to continue to develop a 'canadian sociology'. postscript 1977 in the two years since this paper was written there has been a maturing of my thinking about models and theories of canadian societyt although i continue to accept the paper's central direction. i would now adopt the political economy tradition as the most fruitful approach; in my view, it has the strongest historical roots and the greatest insights int:> canada's social structure. it is a tradition represented in different ways in the works of such diverse people as donald creighton, harold innis, tom naylor and stanley ryerson. it encompasses scholars from c.e.macpherson to h. claire pentland to john porter. broadly contained within this tradition is the tasis for a distinctive canadian social science which would make sense of and give meaning to the development and current structure of canadian society. the following are what i regard as the most central components of a model of canada as develops 1 within the political economy tradition. these features of canadian society give direction to the most appropriate questions to be asked and relationships to be explained: 1. the implications of external relations for internal development, especially early colonial ties with france and the united kingdom and current dependence on the united states in many economic, political and military activities. 2. the. persistently active role of the canadian state in the economy and its fragmented federal-provincial structure . 3the continued survival of two nations within a single state--the conquered french and the conquering ;lish--and the demise of the native population. '* . the role of immigration in filling the west during t-arly stages ol pment (1879 to 191^) and the urban centres of too;