248 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism book review activism that works edited by elizabeth whitmore, maureen g. wilson, and avery calhoun. halifax and winnipeg: fernwood publishing, 2011. $19.95 can, paper. isbn: 978-1-55266-411-7. pages: 1-184. reviewed by christine pich1 activism that works provides an important empirical and collaborative contribution towards literature on action research and social justice activism. in raising the key question – “[h]ow do we know when we’re making a difference?” (p.7) – the editors, through part of a larger collaborative project with nine social justice-oriented organizations, challenge us to think about what it means to be successful in activist work that contributes, in a broad sense, towards social change oriented by “social or environmental justice” (p.8). in partnering with a range of diverse organizations throughout canada – such as oxfam canada, the calgary raging grannies, and the social justice committee – an aim of this book was to provide activists from these organizations the opportunity to reflect upon their work in terms of what factors they believe constitute effectiveness and success, and how they know that they are making a difference. it is in this regard that terms such as ‘activism’ and ‘success’ take on broad and encompassing conceptual meanings. for example, ‘success’ is understood as that which is “described by activists themselves reflecting on their own work” (p.8). this relates to the central theme of the book, that is, in attempting to understand what constitutes ‘successful activism’ in complex contexts, there is no ‘right answer’ or ‘best practice’ when undertaking social justice oriented work. it is in this regard that the editors challenge how success is commonly perceived in terms of linear and tangible outcomes. in contrast, the editors encourage us to think about success on a different scale through the everyday work and successes experienced by a wide range of people (paid workers, volunteers, members of the community) involved within these organizations. the book is organized with the majority of the contents constituting stories from the organizations themselves (in no particular identified order), and with the editors writing the introductory and concluding 1 christine pich is a ph.d. student in the department of sociology and anthropology at carleton university in ottawa. her research interests are in the areas of occupational health, work and labour. book review: activism that works | 249 chapters. it is within the chapters written by the editors that the theoretical and methodological focus is discussed. within the introductory chapters they highlight the difficulties posed by neoliberal capitalism towards activist work. in this regard, they point to the potential of “emancipatory social inquiry” (p.20) in terms of collaborative work between researchers and social movements, and the knowledge coproduced from such efforts. to frame this discussion, they briefly draw upon the work of antonio gramsci (structural and conjunctural analysis; ideological hegemony), paulo friere (conscientization; praxis; participatory action research), and george smith (political activist ethnography). in the concluding chapters, the editors elaborate upon complexity theory, with particular reference to the work of brenda zimmerman (2000). this theory is understood as “a loose network of ideas, a set of mental models” (p.155) which challenges “linear, mechanistic ways of thinking” (p.155) that are outcome-oriented. the theoretical works drawn upon, especially the introduction of complexity theory, provide an intriguing framework towards understanding the complexities of ‘successful activism’. however, a tension in this regard was that they were only briefly drawn upon. it would have been interesting to delve into further discussion of, and identify any potential tensions between, the theoretical approaches. through the use of an appreciative inquiry (ai) lens emphasis is cast upon success and positive experiences, as well as the data sources generated, take a narrative form. this approach is well suited to frame the range of stories of what success means. for example, the disability action hall considers successful features of their work to include building a “sense of community, sense of pride and culture” (p. 53), while the calgary raging grannies highlight the ability to attain media coverage and energize themselves and others through humour and catchy songs. the main contribution of this book is that it highlights how, even in a hostile neoliberal capitalist climate, successes of varying degrees are experienced within the processes of working on social justice issues and that important work is being done on a day-to-day basis in this regard. this is particularly important as it challenges the contemporary orientation of many funding sources in their measures of ‘success’ wherein focus tends to be on readily identifiable results and quantitative reporting mechanisms. in addition, through the involvement of various organizations, this book provides the space for activists to tell their own stories with through creative means, such as a comic book style format in the chapter by the youth project. 250 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism while providing important contributions, the main tension with the book stems from the framing of some key concepts – such as activists, social movements, and social justice – which could have benefited from a more elaborated conceptual analysis as they were quite broad and encompassing. while the intent may have been to provide generous conceptual framings, more discussion towards the potential benefits and limitations of this approach would have been useful. in addition, while the focus of the book is on ‘success,’ and the ai approach is suitable toward achieving this aim, the editors note the assumption “that something works in every organization” (p.24). it would have been useful to provide some discussion of what would be considered as falling outside of notions of success and positive work. furthermore, while the editors introduce the organizations they have worked with within this project, what remained to be more clearly addressed is the methodological rationale for identifying and working with these particular organizations and not others. overall, whitmore et. al.’s edited book provides an important collaborative space for multiple voices to creatively share and reflect upon what they understand as effectiveness and success and the importance of recognizing everyday successes that do not neatly fit into concrete outcomes. with its creative and accessible style and structure, this book will be of particular interest for researchers who work in researchercommunity collaborative projects with the aim to co-produce knowledge, as well as a more general public and activist audience. microsoft word document3 references acheson, t.w., david frank and james d. frost. 1985. industrialization and underdevelopment in the maritimes, 1880-1930. toronto: garamond press. allen, sheila and carol wolkowitz. 1987. homeworking: myths and realities. london: macmillan education. amin, samir. 1994. re-reading the postwar period. new york: monthly review press. amin, samir. 2004. the liberal virus: permanent war and the americanization of the world. new york: monthly review press. bell, daniel. 1973. the coming of post-industrial society. new york: basic books. braverman, harry. 1974. labor and monopoly capital: the degradation of work in the twentieth century. new york: monthly review press. broad, dave. 1988. “peripheralization of the centre: w(h)ither canada?” alternate routes, vol. 8, pp. 1-41. broad, dave. 1991. “global economic restructuring and the (re)casualization of work in the centre: with canadian illustrations,” review, vol. 14, no. 4 (fall), pp. 555-94. broad, dave. 1995a. “globalization, free trade and canadian labour,” critical sociology, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 19-41. broad, dave. 1995b. “globalization and the casual labour problem: history and prospects,” social justice, vol. 22, no. 3 (fall), pp. 67-91. broad, dave. 1995c. “globalization versus labour,” canadian review of social policy, no. 36 (winter), pp. 75-85; monthly review, vol. 47, no. 7 (december), 20-31. broad, dave. 1997. “the casualization of the labour force,” in ann duffy, daniel glenday and norene pupo (eds.), good jobs, bad jobs, no jobs: the transfromation of work in the 21 st century. toronto: harcourt brace & company, pp. 53-73. broad, dave. 2000a. hollow work, hollow society? globalization and the casual labour problem in canada. halifax: fernwood publishing. broad, dave. 2000b. “the periodic casualization of work: the informal economy, casual labour and the longue duree,” in faruk tabak and michaeline a. crichlow (eds.), informalization: process and structure. baltimore: johns hopkins university press, pp. 23-68, 190-195. broad, dave and wayne antony (eds.). 2006. capitalism rebooted? work, welfare and the new economy. halifax: ferwood publishing. broad, dave and garson hunter. 2009. “work, welfare and the new economy: the commodification of everything,” in norene j. pupo and mark thomas (eds.), interrogating the new economy: restructuring work in the 21 st century. toronto: university of toronto press, pp. 21-42. brym, robert j. and r. james sacouman (eds.). 1979. underdevelopment and social movements in atlantic canada. toronto: new hogtown press. clement, wallace. 1975. the canadian corporate elite: an analysis of economic power. ottawa: carleton university press. clement, wallace. 1977. continental corporate power: economic linkages between canada and the united states. toronto: mcclelland and stewart. ecc (economic council of canada). 1990. good jobs, bad jobs: employment in the service economy. ottawa: economic council of canada. ecc (economic council of canada). 1991. employment in the service economy. ottawa: economic council of canada. frank, andre gunder. 1980. crisis: in the world economy. new york: holmes & meyer. frank, andre gunder. 1981. crisis: in the third world. new york: holmes & meyer. frobel, folker, jurgen heinrichs and otto kreye. 1980. the new international division of labour: structural underdevelopment in industrialized countries and industrialization in developing countries. cambridge: cambridge university press. henwood, doug. 2003. after the new economy. new york: the new press. jackson, andrew. 2009. work and labour in canada: critical issues (second edition). toronto: canadian scholars’ press. klaren, peter f. and thomas j. bossert (eds.). 1986. promise of development: theories of change in latin america. boulder: westview press. kotz, david. 2003. “neoliberalism and the us economic expansion of the ‘90s,” monthly review, vol. 54, no. 11 (april), pp. 15-33. la botz, dan. 2010. “unions representing workers in canada, mexico and u.s. explore merger,” mrzine, http://mrzine.monthlyreview.org/2010/labotz280610.html. loxley, john and salim loxley. 2010. public service, private profits: the political economy of public/private partnerships in canada. halifax: fernwood publishing. mcbride, stephen. 2005. paradigm shift: globalization and the canadian state (second edition). halifax: fernwood publishing. mies, maria, veronoka bennholdt-thomsen and claudia von werlhof. 1988. women: the last colony. london: zed books. olsen, dennis. 1980. the state elite. toronto: mcclelland and stewart. panitch, leo and donald swartz. 1985. from consent to coercion: the assault on trade union freedoms. toronto: garamond press. panitch, leo and donald swartz. 2003. from consent to coercion: the assault on trade union freedoms (third edition). toronto: garamond press. peck, jamie. 1996. work-place: the social regulation of work. new york: the guilford press. porter, john. 1965. the vertical mosaic: an analysis of social class and power in canada. toronto: university of toronto press. portes, alejandro, manuel castels and lauren a. benton (eds.). 1989. the informal economy: studies in advanced and less developed countries. baltimore: johns hopkins university press. pupo, norene j. and mark p. thomas (eds.). 2009. interrogating the new economy: restructuring work in the 21 st century. toronto: university of toronto press. rinehart, james w. 2006. the tyranny of work: alienation and the labour process. toronto: thomson nelson. rosenberg, dorothy. 1991. “the colonization of east germany,” monthly review, vol. 43, no. 4 (september), pp. 14-33. ross, andrew. 2004. no-collar: the humane workplace and its hidden costs. philadelphia: temple university press. ross, andrew. 2009. nice work if you can get it: life and labor in precarious times. new york: new york university press. sassen, saskia. 1994. cities in a world economy. thousand oaks, ca: pine forge press. smith, adam. 1776. the wealth of nations. london: penguin books. tabak, faruk and michaeline a. crichlow (eds.). 2000. informalization: process and structure. baltimore: johns hopkins university press. teeple, gary. 2000. globalization and the decline of social reform: into the twenty first century. toronto: garamond press. vosko, leah f. 2000. temporary work: the gendered rise of a precarious employment relationship. toronto: university of toronto press. wallerstein, immanuel. 1995. after liberalism. new york: the new press. notes 1 to give credit where credit is due, my original alternate routes article began life as a doctoral paper for a graduate seminar led by professor dennis olsen. while absolving him of any blame for the final product, i wish to thank dennis for providing a stimulating educational environment, and will put in a plug for his excellent book the state elite (olsen, 1980), which needs to be ranked along with books by john porter (1965) and wallace clement (1975; 1977) as one of the seminal publications from the carleton school of sociology. 2 the post-world war ii era of the cold war resulted in the terminology of first world to describe the developed capitalist countries, generally found in the northern hemisphere, second world to describe the nominally socialist countries of the so-called eastern bloc, and third world to describe the underdeveloped countries, found mostly in the southern hemisphere. hence the terms north and south are sometimes applied to the first world and third world. dependency theorists have also used the term subimperialism to describe the larger countries of the third world, such as brazil and south africa. world-systems theorists have used the term semi-periphery to describe these countries, which lie between the centre and periphery in economic and political power. some authors (e.g., amin, 2004) now refer to certain countries in africa, which have been largely marginalized from the world economy, as the fourth world. this term has also been applied to the situation of many of the world’s indigenous populations. 3 dependency theorists writing in canada and elsewhere have applied the concept of centre-periphery relations to political-economic relations within as well as between countries. 4 with the breakup of the soviet union in 1989, we witnessed the same process with the re-peripheralization of countries in eastern europe by the west (see, e.g., rosenberg, 1991). 5 in my article i had quoted frobel et al. (1980: 45) as saying that the nidl “should be understood as an ongoing process, and not a final result.” 6 see page 12 of my alternate routes article (broad, 1988). 7 panitch and swartz’ book from consent to coercion: the assault on trade union freedoms was updated and expanded twice, most recently as panitch and swartz, 1993. 8 the child care resource and research unit at the university of toronto is a good source for materials on child day care. see www.childcarecanada.org. 9 the canadian centre for policy alternatives provides useful studies on employment, poverty and other social issues in canada. see www.policyalternatives.ca. 10 the four governments were canada, the united states, australia, and new zealand, but with the subsequent election of a labour government australia ratified the declaration. 978-1-926958-01-9 171 book review in and out of crisis: the global financial meltdown and left alternatives, by greg albo, sam gindin and leo panitch. oakland, california: spectre pm press, 2010. $13.95 u.s., paper. isbn: 978-1-60486-212-6. pages: 1-140. reviewed by carlo fanelli1 in and out of crisis is a thought provoking, accessible and politically engaging contribution to debates on the origin, severity and historical significance of the so-called “great recession”. furthermore, as the subtitle the global financial meltdown and left alternatives suggests, albo and authors provide an unapologetically socialist analysis of what to do about it. albo, gindin and panitch remind the reader that the classical meaning of crisis is turning point, to which they ask: has the crisis marked a turning point in the balance of class power and the organization of the state? or can the political alliances and power structures that have dominated the last four decades be reconstituted in what so clearly has been a monumental crisis? for the authors, the short answer to the first question is no and, for the second, yes. this book departs from the tendency of writers (both from the left and right) to view the current responses to crisis as somehow marking a return to keynesianism, or in terms of states versus markets, finance versus industry. instead, rather than lay emphasis on the economic determinations of the crisis, the authors (p.10) seek to politicize and get at the social roots of the problem by moving beyond limited technical or policy solutions to capitalist crises by instead placing democratic and social rights at the centre of their analysis. as they state (p.122): “the interpretation in this book is quite distinct”. 1 carlo fanelli is a ph.d candidate in the department of sociology & anthropology with a concentration in political economy. he can be reached at cfanelli@connect.carleton.ca in and out of crisis: the global financial meltdown and left alternatives 172 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research fortunately, the authors have preemptively summarized the outline of the book (p.25): ‘chapter one explores whether or not we are currently witnessing the end of neoliberalism; chapter two engages in current debates regarding the nature of capitalist crises, and the relationship between the state, finance and production in a neoliberal era; chapter three traces the historical process through which, over a century punctuated by previous cries, the american state and finance developed in tandem, and came to play a new kind of imperial role at the centre of global capitalism; chapter four traces the development of the crisis that began in 2007 and explains the active role of the american state, both under bush and obama, in containing the crisis in ways that reproduced the structures of class inequality and power domestically and internationally; chapter five analyses how the relationship between industry and finance played itself out in the auto sector, bringing to the fore the full class dimensions of the crisis; chapter six reflects on the impasse of the north american labour movement and the implications for the north american left; and chapter seven tries to think creatively about alternatives, not least in terms of how advancing the case for democratic economic planning, including the nationalization of the banks and auto industry, must become integrated with demands for immediate reforms.’ if the reader does not have the time for chapters one through seven, chapter eight’s ten theses on the crisis succinctly summarizes the gist of their arguments. for the purpose of this review, however, i would like to provide a glimpse of what makes in and out of crisis’ analysis distinct. or, in other words, what are likely to be the major points of contention stemming from their investigation. first, contrary to authors that claim that the new deal was an attempt to impose greater ‘regulation’ or ‘controls’ upon capital, albo et al argue that following the great depression of the 1930s, private banking institutions had been nurtured back to health in the post-war decades and then unleashed in the explosion of global innovations that have defined the neoliberal era. and that, despite the meltdown, (p.17) “[t]he conditions that kept neoliberal policies in play for so long have not been exhausted or undone by the crisis.” second, taking aim at a broad spectrum of liberal, keynesian, minskian and orthodox marxist views that posit the end of the american imperium, a return to greater “regulation” or the stagnation tendencies of “mature” capitalist economies (such as robert brenner and the monthly review school for instance), albo and 173 authors argue that, if anything, the crisis has reconfirmed the world’s dependence on the american state and financial system as capital everywhere ran to the safe haven of the us treasury bond. as opposed to the end of american hegemony or the birth of a multi-polar world, the resolution of this international crisis has rested fundamentally on the actions of the us state in leading a more or less coordinated response, and in the process integrating the g20 members into the us’s informal empire in what has been an extraordinarily dynamic period of capitalism. third, albo, gindin and panitch provide a unique examination of the relationship between states and markets, industry and finance and, therein, the class relations that underpin them. rater than viewing ‘financialization’ as narrowly superstructural, parasitic or speculative, or as a result of the tendency for the rate of profit to fall, they situate finance-led neoliberalism in historical terms in the sense that financial volatility actually becomes a developmental feature of neoliberalism that reinforces, rather than undermines the central position of financial interests in capitalist power structures. in their view, neoliberalism is understood as a (p.28) “particular form of class rule and state power that intensifies competitive imperatives for both firms and workers, increases dependence on the market in daily life and reinforces the dominant hierarchies of the world market, with the us at its apex.” fourth, the authors claim (p.91) that a new historical project must be placed on the agenda. in order to do this, the left must come to the bitter realization that the forms of protest, means of organizing and daily practices of activism, most visible in the anti-globalization movements and world social forums, just aren’t working anymore. this means soberly reflecting on the impasse of the north american labour movement, in addition to the successful “disorganization” (on the part of capital) of old working class institutions (labour parties, cooperatives, benefit societies) that has been central to neoliberalism and which threatens to become a historic class defeat. throughout the book, albo et al raise the question as to whether or not the left can develop the confidence to think as big and radical as “they”—the ruling class—are doing in terms of both how workers see the future and what needs to be done to build the capacities to get there. “the way forward”, they argue (p.114) however, “is not to take one step first and another more radical step later, but to find ways of integrating both the immediate demands and the goal of systemic change into the building of new political capacities.” as they remind (p.128), ‘democracy is not just a form of government but a kind of society’, which unavoidably remains fractional and incomplete within capitalism. a few questions, however, may beg further unpacking. in light of the shifting composition of the working class and the role of women’s reproductive labour, how would the expansion of collective social services such as in health care and in and out of crisis: the global financial meltdown and left alternatives 174 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research education, for instance, impact women’s paid and unpaid life experiences given their position in the labour market as a whole and concentration in specific sectors? given the legacy of defeats and setbacks over the period of neoliberalism, how may unions—many trapped in erstwhile social-democratic parties and the constraints of formal union structures—find some basis of unity that could help shape collective struggles in working-class communities and connect the linkages between the employed and unemployed, and those denied a chance to work? what kinds of fresh organizational structures and emergent forms of activism throughout north america and abroad carry potential? on the whole, in and out of crisis is all but certain to have a broad appeal to researchers and academics, as well as students and lay persons alike. the era of neoliberalism—that is, capitalist militancy, is by no means over. in fact, it seems to be gaining new momentum the world over. albo, gindin and panitch, in their short but no less provocative book, do much to not only shed light on what led to the enduring socio-economic and political uncertainty, but provide a much needed analysis on what may need to be done in order to avoid such relapses in the future. whole book pdf book review: the ecological rift: capitalism’s war on the earth | 285 book review the ecological rift: capitalism’s war on the earth, by john bellamy foster, brett clark, and richard york. new york: monthly review press, 2010. $17.95 u.s.; paper. isbn: 978-1-58367218-1. pages: 544. reviewed by: naomi alisa calnitsky1 in marx’s ecology: materialism and nature (2000), john bellamy foster offered a dynamic and in-depth interrogation of the ecological strands of karl marx’s thought, exploring a number of marx’s critiques of capitalist agriculture and linking his neglected ideas to the modern-day ecological movement. in ecology against capitalism (2002), foster problematized the relationship between contemporary american environmentalism and the needs and preferences of the labour movement, and offered critical insights into the environment’s relationship with the economic world, citing critical contemporary examples of the environmental costs associated with the capitalist industrial footprint. his innovative and up-to-date approach placed politicized ecological questions into direct focus, to ask, how might we incorporate the earth into the balance sheet? building upon past theoretical approaches and contributions, in the ecological rift: capitalism’s war on the earth (2010), foster, clark and york offer a radical and comprehensive critique of the planetary environmental crisis as exacerbated by industrial capitalism. situated within the subfield of environmental sociology, the authors posit arguments which depart from a distinctly marxist foundation. their central target is industrial capitalism and its derivative effects, namely, the unsustainable social habits of consumer forces associated with capitalist production, and the unprecedented levels of ecological destruction associated with accumulative capitalism. foster, clark and york highlight the alienating tendencies of capitalism, as well as the irreversible changes wrought upon our ecosystem and biosphere from capitalist activities. 1 naomi alisa calnitsky is a ph.d. candidate at the department of history, carleton university (ottawa, canada), with a focus on the history of mexican seasonal agricultural workers in western canada. 286 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times by re-inserting ecological thought into analyses of the human economy, this highly-needed and readable work comprised of scientific arguments and synthetic approaches underscores planetary assaults resulting from the human-industrial footprint and bemoans an apparent lack of concern within social science disciplines towards environmental questions at a time when the planet has approached a red alert status. situated within a critical anti-capitalist tradition, the authors point to an abandonment of a critique of capital in existing ecologically-minded social science approaches. they consider the question of “green capitalism,” or capitalism’s potential or ostensible ability to modernize and adapt along ecologically sustainable lines, in a critical light. additionally, they question the deceptive phenomenon of “corporate green-washing.” the work emphasizes accelerated transformations in the global environment, where ecosystem degradation and human-induced climate change is linked intimately to the expansion of industrial capitalism. the authors argue that the recovery of the environment may not be ameliorated solely through faith in capitalism’s ability to adapt or modernize according to green demands. while this remains a problematic viewpoint, given the fact of capitalism’s current position as the dominant economic system governing human economic interrelations across much of the globe, the marxist critique offered by the ecological rift nevertheless remains indispensable. one of the book’s central strengths is its questioning of the premise of unlimited economic growth from an ecologycentered perspective, in which capital is depicted as an “unstoppable” as well as “crushing” force upon nature. the ecological rift successfully bridges a diversity of academic fields including economics, ecology, and environmental/marxist sociology, taking its readership into the realm of a yet-to-be established field, that of political ecology. its authors highlight irreversible ecological transformations such as ocean warming and the degradation of coral reef systems, and place a good deal of emphasis upon scientific proofs for the existence of climate change. highlights of the work include one imaginative chapter entitled “capitalism in wonderland” which illustrates how environmental deterioration has stemmed from human mediations with the natural world and has been propelled by the demands of the capitalist marketplace. here, our capitalist wonderland is framed by foster, clark and york as a thoroughly artificial and alienating human landscape and construct. the ecological rift has global and international implications, and yet it would likely appeal only to an environmentalistinclined readership. the work requires attention from ecological and book review: the ecological rift: capitalism’s war on the earth | 287 economic schools alike, as its efforts to bridge fields represents a widening of boundaries in the name of ecological urgency. significantly, the authors engage with the concept of metabolic rift, defined loosely as the way in which the capitalist system has radically separated natural production from sites consumption, particularly at a global scale and across imperial divides. capitalism has radically separated humanity from nature, and through “metabolic rift analysis” the authors seek to comprehend environmental catastrophe in terms of the capitalist order of things. critically entertaining the question of capitalism’s ability to modernize and adapt according to the demands of sustainability, the ecological rift retains skepticism towards the destructive effects of individualist accumulation and prefers socialism as a route towards sustainability. critically, the work stresses the need for a renewed interrogation into the dynamic relationship between nature and capitalism. it is primarily concerned with an interrogation of capitalism as an anti-ecological force, yet remains wholly devoid of any analysis of capitalism’s relationship with gender, avoiding any discussion of capitalism’s continued place as maleoriented, rationalized economic regime which exploits and intersects with the natural world in profoundly powerful ways. still, the work offers a number of solutions deserving of consideration. offering a dialogue which incorporates the natural sciences with the social sciences, the ecological rift is profoundly multi-disciplinary and one of the strengths of the book is its sense of urgency. the authors claim that we are living in an age of unprecedented ecological destruction and only radical ecological approaches may offer sustainable pathways for environmental regeneration. the author’s discussion of “imperialism and ecological metabolism” probes the concept of imperialist extraction as it intersected with agricultural production and consumption in metropolitan england, exploring the nineteenth century peruvian guano trade to europe from a metabolic standpoint and citing the trade as an example of capitalist exploitation and structural dependency. marx’s humanism, “naturalism” and concept of labour as a metabolic mediation of nature are given due attention. while highly dependent upon marx’s “ecological” mind, without emphasizing contributions from more contemporary ecological thinkers, foster, clark and york reinforce their call for social scientists to interrogate capitalism as it intersects with the natural world. also significantly, the work charts disciplinary transformations and recent theoretical developments in the ecological sciences which have contributed to the genealogy of the sub-discipline of environmental sociology. 978-1-926958-01-9 133 culture political poetry lyle daggett1 “political” poetry. all human activity is political because it takes place in a context — the context of history. sending someone a recipe for crab meat salad is one thing if you work food prep in a restaurant kitchen. it means something else if you’re nancy reagan. poets have been political, in some sense of the word, from the earliest beginnings to the present. enheduanna, sumerian poet, priestess of the moon goddess inanna, the earliest poet whose name is known. the chinese government compiled collections of popular folk songs — for example, the shih ching, the book of songs — as a way of learning something about what the people were thinking. (did nixon listen to bob dylan or joan baez or pete seeger? does george bush listen to billy bragg or tracy chapman or rap music?) homer was political. (george bush on the walls of troy.) the bhagavad gita (which j. robert oppenheimer quoted as he watched the first atomic bomb explode in the new mexico desert) was and is political. the plays of aeschylus and sophocles and euripedes were defining forces in greek society. dante and shakespeare were all political. (if dante were writing today, who would he consign to the ninth circle of hell?) the great flowering of art and culture in medieval spain grew originally from the founding of a new umayyad dynasty in exile by survivors of the conquest of damascus by the abbasids. the trouveres and troubadours of medieval france lived in a time of constant upheaval and displacement and continuously shifting political alliances, in which most if not all of them were intimately involved. (many died during the wholesale slaughter that took place during the albigensian crusades, following which troubadour poetry essentially came to a halt.) 1 this work was first published by pemmican press. political poetry 134 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research chaucer was political, tu fu (or du fu) was political, murasaki shikibu was political. andrew marvell, william blake, shelley, keats, byron, whitman, rubén darío, josé martí, yosano akiko. political, in at least some sense of the word. what we’re talking about here is something more specific. we’re talking about poetry that expresses or reflects — either explicitly or at least by suggestion — politics that are left-wing, working-class, populist, or of a similar character. how to combine politics with creative work remains an unsettled question on the political left. this is not simply a question of socialist or communist realism versus whatever else. the widespread stereotype of socialist realism emphasizes the huge public portraits and statues of lenin, stalin, mao, etc., and maybe allows for some murals and poster art of muscle-bound workers in factories and rosy-cheeked starry-eyed young men and women gazing off at the bright horizon of the future. this, again, is the stereotype. but it should be patently obvious that public portraits and monument sculpture, poster art, and so on, comprise only a portion of (and not necessarily the best) of a culture’s art. we cannot judge the effectiveness of socialst realism (or any other artistic movement or tendency of the political left) based only on the more mediocre or homogenized examples. should we judge the art of capitalist societies based only on norman rockwell and mount rushmore? should we judge american literature based on mcguffey’s reader? are these the basis for the prevailing critical standards advocated by the literature and art departments at leading universities? for every norman rockwell there’s a diego rivera, a david siqueiros, a walter crane, a sue coe; for every edgar guest and joyce kilmer there’s a thomas mcgrath, a muriel rukeyser, a hugh macdiarmid. some people argue that there is much badly written political poetry — that much of it reads like a political pamphlet chopped into line breaks, or sing-song rhyming doggerel — and that this proves that political subject matter is not suited to poetry. but there is also much badly written love poetry, badly written poetry about religion, nature, and every other subject. do we then conclude that love, religion, nature, etc., are also unsuitable subjects for poetry? do hallmark greeting cards invalidate the work of dante and shakespeare and shelley and wordsworth? journalism reports facts; poetry tells the truth. in our time much political discourse in english — including discourse on the political left — is weighted with high-sounding rhetoric, with the greco-roman vocabulary of philosophy, psychology, and the other social sciences. one of our tasks, when writing about political subject matter (or any other subjects) is to make decisions about the vocabulary we use. 135 there is nothing wrong with using, in a poem, words such as “capitalism,” “working class,” “imperialism,” “revolution,” etc. the challenge is to ground such language in the concrete physical texture and detail of the world we live in from day to day, to reclaim it from the bourgeois abuse and alienation it has suffered, to give it the life and meaning it can actually have. we are not talking about merely taking a political speech or pamphlet, or a set of theoretical statements, and simplistically grafting them onto the skeleton of a poem — as if writing a poem were an act of taxidermy. it’s difficult to write a love poem if you’ve never been in love, or to write a poem about nature if you’ve never touched a tree. similarly, it can be difficult to write a good political poem if you’ve never marched in an anti-war demonstration, or faced a platoon of police in riot gear preparing to charge, or tried to pay rent or medicals when you’ve been unemployed for six months. the best examples of good left-wing political poetry are written out of an organic understanding of the politics, and out of a passionate involvement in the political movements of the time and place in which the poet lives. poetry of the political left from the twentieth century has developed along several currents or tendencies. my intention here is not to define rigid categories but to give examples of some of the possibilities poets have explored. though one or two of the poets i’ve named below might not strictly be considered politically left, all have at least shown a general outlook in their work that is populist, workingclass, anti-fascist, radically democratic, or of a similar character. 1. poetry rich in metaphor and imagery, poetry that works mainly be evoking feeling and sensory experience (rather than by elaborating intellectual argument or rhetorical appeal). example poets might be pablo neruda (usually), paul éluard, lorca, yosano akiko, mahmoud darwish, dale jacobson, rené depestre. sometimes verging on surrealism, as with éluard and lorca and depestre. 2. poetry that is agitational in tone, spare in imagery and metaphor, working by the kinetic energy of public speech. examples are bertolt brecht, mayakovsky, sol funaroff, langston hughes, césar vallejo in spain, take this cup from me. 3. poetry similar to the second type above but with a quieter voice, more personal, direct face-to-face speech rather than public oratory. examples are nazim hikmet, otto rené castillo, roque dalton, claribel alegría, maria aliger, anna swir, joy harjo sometimes, carl sandburg, luis j. rodríguez often, faiz ahmed faiz. 4. poetry that derives from or consciously imitates folk song. examples include brecht (sometimes), thomas mcgrath (sometimes), josé martí, hugh macdiarmid occasionally, langston hughes, naomi replansky at times. 5. poetry that is essentially traditional or classical lyric in tone (whether or not employing the external forms — sonnets, quatrains, etc.). examples are thomas political poetry 136 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research mcgrath (most characteristically), louis aragon, miguel hernández, rafael alberti, mao tse-tung [or mao zedong], william blake (in the shorter lyric poems), rubén darío, yannis ritsos, nancy morejón, don gordon, olga cabral, nelly sachs. 6. poetry that communicates by its rhetorical strength, poetry of ecstatic utterance. similar to type 2 above but with more elevated language. examples are william blake (in the “prophetic” poems), léopold senghor, walt whitman, kenneth fearing, yannis ritsos in some of his longer poems, anuradha mahapatra, joy harjo sometimes, dennis brutus, janice mirikitani, muriel rukeyser. 7. poetry that communicates mainly by intellectual argument or statement. examples are w. h. auden, edwin rolfe, jack beeching. 8. poetry that is documentary or journalistic in tone and method. examples are agostinho neto, javier heraud, leonel rugama, zöe anglesey (often), yannis ritsos (sometimes), anna swir (sometimes), nazim hikmet especially in his booklength poem human landscapes from my country. 9. poetry that works by humor or satire, or by an overall humorous or satirical tone. examples include kenneth patchen (often), thomas mcgrath now and then, kenneth fearing from time to time, mayakovsky often. obviously none of the poets named above wrote purely in the manners or styles outlined here. all have written poetry that fluidly combines the various approaches described above, and are certainly not limited to the possibilities given here. the above list is, again, intended to suggest some of the existing possibilities, not to limit or define rigidly. let us state here for the record that political correctness, understood properly, is a good thing. the expression “politically correct” originally meant “politically (and/or ethically/morally) the right thing to do.” it became a little confusing, sometimes, to talk about what was “politically right” because it sounded a little bit like “the political right” (who are, of course, politically wrong). so people got into the habit of saying “politically correct” instead, which sounded a little pompous sometimes but tended to be less confusing. to write poetry with political content that is left-wing, working-class, populist, or of a similar nature, is the right thing to do. the examples above make it clear that it is thoroughly possible to write poetry that has progressive political content and that is well-written. the fact is that leftwing political poetry, taken as a whole, is better poetry than poetry in which the poet has tried to leave politics out of it, or in which the poet has deliberately written from a right-wing perspective (i suppose a few examples of the latter do exist). we should have no hesitation about saying this — not, obviously, as absolute decrees from olympus, but as acts of affirmative belief: carl sandburg wrote better poetry than ezra pound. muriel rukeyser wrote better poetry than t. s. eliot. thomas mcgrath wrote better poetry than robert lowell. langston hughes 137 wrote better poetry than wallace stevens. gwendolyn brooks wrote better poetry than marianne moore. mayakovsky wrote better poetry than akhmatova or mandelstam. brecht wrote better poetry than rilke. otto rené castillo and leonel rugama wrote better poetry than octavio paz. etheridge knight wrote better poetry than john berryman. sharon doubiago and joy harjo and dale jacobson and luis rodríguez and nellie wong write better poetry than jorie graham or marvin bell or c. k. williams or billy collins or sharon olds. we don’t need the ruling class (or its representatives in arts and letters) to tell us whether or not we’re good poets. the record of our poetry, and the history from which it arises, speaks for itself. we reject “literary” standards that preclude politics as acceptable or essential subject matter. we belong in the real world of the living — breathing, changing, revolutionary — and the real world (and the poetry that grows from it) is the only answer we need to give. political poetry 138 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research whole book pdf book review: revolutionary doctors | 267 book review revolutionary doctors: how venezuela and cuba are changing the world’s conception of health care by steve brouwer. new york: new york: monthly review press, 2011. $18.95 u.s., paper. isbn: 978-1-58367-239-6. pages: 1-256. reviewed by rebekah wetmore1 revolutionary doctors explores the human needs based health care model developed in cuba and how those involved are becoming protagonists of social change. beginning with cuba’s original revolutionary doctor – che guevara – readers are guided through the origins of cuban health care, how it spread to venezuela and beyond, and the counterrevolutionary response. che guevara’s vision of “combining the humanitarian mission of medicine with the creation of a just society” (p.11) is being implemented in cuba and venezuela. soon after the triumph of the cuban revolution, thousands of doctors and over a hundred medical professors left the country further weakening their inadequate medical system. the new cuban government insisted on developing universal health care through adopting a preventative based system, opening a second medical school and creating positions for recent graduates of the university of havana medical school in rural areas. health care continued to improve including through the creation of basic health teams and brigadistas sanitarias or health brigades in the end of the 1980’s. every small neighborhood has a basic health team, which includes one doctor and one nurse who live in the community. not only did this increase community coverage to 99% by 2004 but it also gave residents more of an active role in their health care. health brigades, made up of residents, assist doctors in prevention programs and public health campaigns. while cuba created universal health care domestically, they continued their commitment to internationalism. from algeria to angola and more recently haiti, cuba has sent health professionals on humanitarian missions for over five decades in response to emergencies and “long-term collaboration in developing 1 rebekah wetmore is an independent researcher and community organizer. she has an ma in sociology from acadia university in wolfville, nova scotia. 268 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism another nation’s system of primary health care” or the comprehensive health plan (p.45). along with humanitarian missions, the latin american school of medicine (elam) was founded in 1998 for students from around the world to study medicine for free. in return, students promise to serve the poor of their country through preventative community health care. venezuela’s health care was in desperate need of an overhaul as “prior to 2003, there were just 1,500 doctors employed by the venezuelan government to provide primary care in a public system that had 4,400 offices called ambulatorios” (p.85). as a means to improve health care the cuba-venezuela comprehensive cooperation agreement, a precursor to the bolivarian alliance of the peoples of our americas (alba), was signed on october 30, 2000. this agreement allowed for the exchange of goods, services and experts between the two countries with oil as the largest export from venezuela and cuba offering human capital through “thousands of teachers, agronomists, technicians and other experts” (p.81). after the failed economic coup in 2002, the government consolidated control of pdvsa, the state oil company, and its revenue, which was used to increase funding for social programs such as barrio adentro to address the inadequate public health system. barrio adentro has been expanded to include four different levels from preventative primary care, diagnostic centers, updating and modernizing the public health care system through increased community involvement, improved medical technology and the construction of new hospitals, and building new specialized research hospitals for specific areas like oncology, cardiology and nephrology. similar to the cuban model, these missions mobilize community members to be active participants in their health care. if a community wants a cuban doctor they are “expected to organize a committee of ten to twenty volunteers from the community who would commit themselves to finding office spaces, providing sleep quarters, collecting furniture and simple fixtures, and feeding the medical providers” (p.84). though brouwer singles out health professionals as protagonists of social change, community members who support the health programs are also shaping the socialist project. integrating community members into the system empowers residents while giving them a direct role in shaping their health care and negating top down approaches. in terms of gender, women are becoming empowered through their involvement in health committees to increase their involvement in their communities. a main argument of revolutionary doctors – that those involved in health book review: revolutionary doctors | 269 care are becoming protagonists for socialist change can be extended to include all participants of missions or social programs in venezuela. not only are venezuelans taking an active role in their health care but also other missions including education (ribas, robinson and sucre) and local government through communal councils. both countries have made huge gains in traditional measures of health care and the social determinants of health but there are still problems internally and abroad. the united states attempts to undermine the new conception of health care through media, laws and aid to destabilizing groups. domestically, problems include inconsistent coverage in the most disadvantaged communities and the inherited inefficient bureaucracy. critics argue that cuba’s health care has suffered from a decrease in doctors as large numbers continue to go on humanitarian missions, which pays considerably more than practicing in cuba. as is set out in the agreement between cuba and venezuela and all countries with humanitarian missions, cuban doctors will leave and host countries must develop self-sufficient health care systems. a common critique is that an insufficient number of new doctors are trained and thus host countries continue to be dependent on cuban doctors. as a response to potential dependency, mission sucre, the program for free university level education, in conjunction with barrio adentro, medicinia integral communitaria, “university without walls” (p.15), and elam train new medical doctors. in the end, brouwer provides a compelling case for the needs based conception of health care, which has improved the lives of the poor around the world. his arguments are supported with the fascinating personal stories that are weaved throughout the book. from medical students studying in medicinia integral comunitaria in the small village of monte carmelo to cuban doctors’ experiences in post-earthquake haiti, there are numerous examples of seemingly ordinary people working to create a better health care system and society. these stories provide hope that there is an alternative to the profit-driven capitalist model of health care and capitalism in general. 258 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism book review 500 years of indigenous resistance by gord hill. oakland, california: pm press, 2009. $10.00 us, paper. isbn: 978-1-60486-106-8. pages: 172. reviewed by kevin partridge1 gord hill originally published this work as part of a revolutionary indigenous newspaper in 1992 in order to provide a brief history of the colonization of the americas from 1492. it is aimed at a broad audience of people who are interested in reading a historical narrative that is often suppressed and excluded from many discussions of the colonization of the americas. it is well crafted for this purpose with its clear writing, brief length and interesting graphics by the author as well as the inclusion of some archival photographs. the arguments in the book are supported by a variety of citations and references that provide the reader with a good grasp of the field of research in which the author is locating his research. however, he does not reference many written sources and the book does not contain the sort of voluminous bibliographic information that is common to books aimed at a more academic audience. the author claims that this book is just a plain historical chronology, yet it is clearly guided by a theoretical understanding of colonization and historical development that is well developed and considerably at odds with much of history that is written from a eurocentric perspective. hill seems apologetic when he writes about his own lack of knowledge of “authentic indigenous philosophy” (p.5) but he provides a reflexive awareness of his own position as a member of the kwakiutl (kwakwaka’wakw) nation on the west coast, as well as his position as a political activist within a globalized system that continues to encroach upon indigenous lands. this is a book with a political purpose and it is useful for its qualities as a polemic and also for its straightforward explanation of the beliefs and motivations that lie behind the strong commitment shown by many people in indigenous activist communities around the globe. 1 kevin partridge is a ph.d. candidate in the department of sociology and anthropology at carleton university in ottawa. book review: 500 years of indigenous resistance | 259 this book should not be seen as a corrective to the current mainstream construction of the history of the americas a sort of liberal attempt to provide a balance of viewpoints but is instead an outline of a historical narrative that is created from the experiences of people who have often been eliminated from the historical record. the author is particularly interested in challenging the argument that colonization in the americas is a process that will eventually be of benefit to the colonized as well as the colonizer. he bluntly states that the colonization process has been an “american indian holocaust” (p.6) that resulted in the deaths of millions of people and the destruction of entire nations and their respective cultures and histories. he then goes on to provide some of the stories and evidence both of this destruction and the resistance that has accompanied it from the time of the first contact with europeans to current conflicts involving indigenous peoples. since the book was originally written in the early 1990s, the conflicts he describes include the oka confrontation in quebec, the lil’wat blockade in bc and an assault on logging operations on lubicon cree land in alberta. the book is composed of fifteen very short chapters that are organized in a broadly chronological order. they begin with a brief description of the multitude of peoples, nations and languages that were spread over the americas before columbus’s ship, the santa maria, landed somewhere in the caribbean region in 1492. the four pages allotted to this era is nowhere near enough space to do justice to the variety of histories that hill is trying to cover but he does convey a sense of the cultural richness of the americas. unfortunately, as he points out, there was little understanding of this cultural wealth on the part of the europeans who quickly grasped the material opportunities to finance their voyages by seizing goods and people using both deceit and superior weapons. this exploitation was rapidly formalized by the creation of colonial administrative structures guided by the expanding economic needs of european imperial countries. hill describes almost constant warfare and exploitation of labour, land and resources since european settlers first arrived. these struggles completely alter the social landscape of north america by bringing in people from many other places in the world as well as contributing to the deaths of many millions of indigenous people, the profound alteration of social structures that survived, and the export of a huge amount and variety of resources. hill provides a number of examples such as the brutal campaign to seize gold from the americas for shipment to spain (p.14). he also argues that there is a parallel history of resistance to these 260 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism changes. he shifts his focus in the last two chapters to more specific struggles as he cites examples of confrontations at oka, oldman river and in the lil’wat nation in british columbia to show that indigenous resistance is still an active and viable force within the political landscape of canada in particular. this book was originally written as a response to the 500th anniversary of the landing of the santa maria. hill is presenting a history of resistance to this silencing of voices that is both still present and still relevant within our current political environment. he is successful in putting forward a narrative that illustrates both continuity and complexity. there is no attempt here to create a comprehensive story of the many nations that have been involved in this process and the focus of this book is primarily on canadian history. nor is he trying to argue the ‘truth’ behind the narratives. the length of the book does not allow for a great deal of discussion of the history that he presents. it appears that the point of the book, however, is not just to talk about history but to help change it. this book is successful in contributing to both the political dialogues and the struggles in which it is located. despite hill’s own doubts about his place amongst an ‘authentic’ indigenous philosophical tradition, this book shows that he has a definite and unique contribution to make to that history and this book is useful for those who are looking for alternative historical narratives and for people who may be trying to understand the motivations and understandings that lie behind apparently widely separated expressions of indigenous resistance that repeatedly crop up in the mainstream news with little explanation. this work is a valuable contribution that could be very useful for teachers, activists and others who are interested in challenging the often complacent acceptance of the colonization of the americas. 296 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times book review economic democracy: the working class alternative to capitalism, by allan engler, halifax: fernwood publishing, 2010. $15.95 cad paper. isbn 9781552663462. pages 1-112. reviewed by: chris hurl1 in this world of highly specialized academic discourse, the art of writing a manifesto has all but disappeared. a good manifesto should be short, concise and all-encompassing. through sharp language it should cut to the core. in this sense, allan engler’s short book, economic democracy, should be seen as a contribution to the revival of the manifesto in confronting neoliberalism in canada and around the world. as a long-time activist in the labour movement, heading up local 400 of the international longshore and warehouse union (ilwu) and contributing to a strong left current in the vancouver and district labour council (vdlc), engler approaches the problems of modern capitalism as an organic intellectual. building on his earlier work, in which he examines the myth of market individualism, he diagnoses in clear language the many deep-seated problems inherent under capitalism and attempts to prescribe a solution, based on grassroots economic democracy. inspired by marx, engler situates modern capitalism in the disjuncture between the narrow restriction of property rights and the growing socialization of labour. on the one hand, ownership under capitalism is concentrated into the hands of an “entitled minority”. while this is often obfuscated through the apparent freedom of individuals to buy and sell things on the market, engler argues that market freedom is just another word for “letting the capitalists decide” (18). engler traces the implications of minority entitlement over the past three hundred years, which has entailed the destabilization of the world market, the destruction of the environment, the rise of colonial wars and the exploitation of peripheral regions by the core countries. on the other hand, people are increasingly interdependent, tied together in a complex division of labour. less and less capable of existing 1  chris hurl is a ph.d. candidate at the department of sociology and anthropology, carleton university (ottawa, canada). book review: economic democracy | 297 outside of market relations, they become dependent on social cooperation in order to survive. with the growing socialization of labour, the myth of competitive individualism becomes open to contestation as, increasingly, working people come to recognize that productivity cannot be simply attributed to the entrepreneurial spirit of individual capitalists, but is the outcome of complex relationships advanced between workers, communities, and nature. while engler goes some distance in diagnosing the problems of modern capitalism, he does not quite meet his mark. the key to writing a good manifesto is not only exposing the dark and dismal reality, but also evoking the collective protagonist that promises a way out, cobbling together a shared sensibility that transcends the relationship between author and reader. a good manifesto stands between voluntarism and determinism, such that the transformation envisioned is neither the result of the inevitable march of progress, nor is it simply a matter of waking people up out of false consciousness. on the one hand, the book falls short to the extent that it falls back on deterministic arguments. just like the transition from feudalism to capitalism, engler argues, the movement to a post-capitalist world will be a gradual one. it will not be produced through a revolutionary dictatorship or armed uprising. no single event will bring it about. in fact, the change will be incremental through the advancement of workplace organization, community mobilization and democratic political action. through slowly extending the power of social ownership, the powers of the “entitled minority” will be necessarily weakened. eventually, a “tipping point” will be reached and the system will be transformed as a whole. but how will the power of “social ownership” be advanced? at times this reads as an inevitable process. from the emergence of the early industrial unions through to the development of social security and the advancement of the rights of women and people of colour, engler’s account of twentieth century history appears as a ceaseless movement forward fuelled by the growing socialization of labour. however, barring a few comments on the deregulation of capital flows, he fails to sufficiently explain the significant shift in ruling relations over the last forty years. the rise of neoliberalism is simply attributed to the failure of trade union leaders and single-issue social activists to challenge the system as a whole. it is attributed to the lack of faith by the working class that a viable alternative to capitalism exists. missing from engler’s analysis is an in-depth discussion of “socialized labour,” which he defines as “people who depend on income from 298 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times their labour” (45). the rise of socialized labour is in part attributed to a process of primitive accumulation, by which people are dispossessed of their land and are compelled to sell their labour for a wage. it is fuelled by a process of technological innovation, through which people are integrated into an increasingly complex social machine. however, the notion of socialized labour is limited. to the extent that it includes everyone, this category lacks analytical power. it does not provide an adequate means of understanding the divisions in progressive social movements or the problem of building solidarity in the broader community. on the other hand, engler poses the solution as a matter of proper consciousness. it is simply a matter of showing people that a world of human equality, democracy and cooperation is practical and attainable. “once the scaffoldings of capitalist property relations have been removed, people will understand that well-being everywhere depends on human equality” (62). unfortunately, engler does not convincingly show how such a world is possible. instead, he falls back on the evocation of the hypothetical situation, that moment when revolution has been achieved, minority entitlement has been abolished and the community finally sits down to make its own decisions. the problem is that engler does not explain who or what this “community” is. this can, in part, be attributed to his latent populism. he tends to target forces external to the community that are responsible for its downfall. the “working class alternative” is purely negative, in the sense that it is simply contingent on denying minority entitlement. however, there is no sense of how this is a positive program. aside from a few hints of union organizing and social activism, there is no discussion of existing movements that are taking concrete steps towards a better world. in the absence of such a discussion, the advancement of alternatives is inevitably abstract and schematic. at times, engler appears as a makeshift fortune-teller, promising an end to war, environmental degradation and social inequality, viewing this more as a natural outcome than as a process that must be actively pursued through the adoption of specific strategies and tactics over the course of struggle. “socialized labour” and “community” are the two black-boxes that engler leaves unexplained. however, the book does take us in the direction of rethinking these terms and their relationship in practice. certainly, the rise of neoliberalism over the past forty years reflects the advancement of a fractured landscape upon which citizenship and wage labour have been unevenly inscribed. in this context, how can we effectively struggle to reconstitute the relationship between “work” book review: economic democracy | 299 and “citizenship” in a manner that undermines the market individualism that has been so prevalent over the past forty years? for instance, how does this play out on the ground through the struggles of public sector workers to retain their collective bargaining freedoms? or in the struggles of illegal immigrants to obtain the right to residence, gaining access to public schools and hospitals? in appraising the prefigurative possibilities of such struggles, it is not enough to simply invoke the universal protagonist that promises a way out. rather, it is important to recognize how these struggles come to develop concrete relationships with a broader community in practice. 978-1-926958-01-9 159 reviews book review about canada: animal rights, by john sorenson. black point, nova scotia and winnipeg, manitoba: fernwood publishing company limited, 2010. $17.95 can, paper. isbn: 978-1-55266-356-1. pages: 1-192. reviewed by priscillia lefebvre1 about canada: animal rights is one in a series of books that critically examines vital issues pertaining to social justice, healthcare, and public services in canadian society. john sorenson delivers an extensive analysis of animal rights in canada, which is both extremely disturbing and informative. in his exploration of this important and controversial topic, sorenson provides us with numerous examples of the exploitation and abuse of animals within industry, as well as the sad shortcomings of canadian legislation intended to regulate it. he explains the issue of animal rights in a comprehensive and yet extremely accessible way. because of its broad nature, sorenson does not delve into an exhaustive analysis of any one topic but provides the reader with an excellent overview of the legal, historical, and social issues surrounding animal rights in canada as well as the arguments, misconceptions, and industry propaganda embedded within it. sorenson begins with a discussion of animal rights within the broader social justice movement by remarking that all too often animal rights are disregarded by many otherwise progressive people as a legitimate concern. for many, he explains, animal rights are considered inferior to the widely accepted notion of the hierarchical order of nature in which human beings dominate and take priority over concerns of other species. labeled as pretentious or sentimental, animal rights issues are placed at odds with other struggles instead of being considered central to many sites 1 priscillia lefebvre is a ph.d candidate in the department of sociology & anthropology with a concentration in political economy. she can be reached at plefebvr@connect.carleton.ca about canada: animal rights 160 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research of oppression. sorenson takes issue with this by stating that to view a compassion for the suffering of animals as somehow indicative of a disregard for the suffering of humans is nonsensical and creates a false dichotomy between the two, as if systemic violence towards animals and the environment does not also include an attack on human labour and health under patriarchal capitalism. animal rights activists, to a great extent, are also accused of extremism and called terrorists, mainly pointing to groups such as the animal liberation front, by those who would defend animal exploitation and cruelty under the present system. sorenson likens this socially constructed bifurcation to racism and sexism, ideologies which have been historically used to justify the oppression of marginalized others. sorenson readies his audience for this discussion with the following passage (p.11): capitalism involves exploitation of animals as well as humans and the profit-motive extends suffering to a broader scale: billions of animals are killed each year in the food, vivisection, fashion, hunting, and entertainment industries. mistreatment of animals is shaped by systems of oppression that developed over time to maintain profit, privilege and power. sorenson’s abolitionist perspective is based first and foremost on the premise, outlined by gary francione, that animals are to be recognized as having one basic right—the right not to be considered property. all animals are sentient beings who deserve respect and are not to be seen as at the disposal of humans, and for this he makes no apologies. sorenson maintains that the commodification of animals enables their usage by humans to attain whatever ends deemed fit by the owner, be it for profit, labour, experimentation or otherwise. he details accounts of the gruesome activities taking place in industrial meat production, factory farming, and in the slaughter of cows, pigs, chickens as well as the production of more so-called upscale delicacies such as duck foie gras, marine animals, and exotic meats. he explores animals being tortured and abused for entertainment purposes and sport such as in hunting, rodeos, horse-racing, circuses, and zoos. sorenson also speaks of the ugliness of the pet industry in his examples of puppy mills, as well as cases of extreme animal cruelty on the part of pet owners and individuals. he also refers to and provides examples of the redundancy and ineffectualness of animal research in canada. although reading numerous accounts of violence and excruciating pain being inflicted on animals does not make for an enjoyable read per se, it is an important one for those willing to confront the truly horrible production methods of what we, as a society, consume on a daily basis. sorenson reestablishes the links between animal and human suffering through a survey of the detrimental role that animal exploitation and the killing of animals for profit plays in capitalist colonial expansion. he argues that animal rights issues 161 must be integrated as part of the greater ecological and economic crisis by interrogating the animal industry’s contribution to serious threats to human survival such as global warming and starvation. corporate interests will never allow for animal rights as that would interfere with their profits. to combat this, corporations have invested millions of dollars, a significant portion of which comes from taxpayers awarded through government subsidies, in public relations propaganda. for example, sorenson outlines the opportunistic use of indigenous people by the fur industry as marketing tools to promote themselves as preserving canada’s rich cultural heritage and supporting traditional ways of living by paying aboriginal fur-trappers next to nothing for the bloody work of killing animals. many would say this relationship is far more representative of canada’s tradition of colonization and genocide of indigenous people than it is of respecting or preserving aboriginal culture. lending to the strength of his arguments, particularly when speaking of canada’s indefensible seal hunt, he also lays out the irrationality of much of the animal industry’s practices not only in moral, but economic terms. in doing so, he calls into question the sustainability of such practices and explores who really profits from them. in most cases, such as the seal hunt, it is fur industry corporations who lobby the federal government’s department of fisheries and oceans to continue defending the mass killing of seals under the guise of job creation for off-season fishermen and animal population control, even in the face of embarrassing international public anger and costly boycotts. ironically, this also follows the same orwellian logic that conservation through culling initiatives propagate in that in order to preserve animals we must kill them. sorenson also points out that, in reality, these brutal annual practices only account for a tiny fraction of income for labourers, while producing hazardous consequences for the ocean’s ecosystem and costing governments several times more money to orchestrate than it generates. in fact, one gets the impression that it would be cheaper to cancel the hunt altogether and just give sealers the money they make during this mass killing outright. as the fur market declines, it would seem that the seal hunt, referred to by many as ‘canada’s shame,’ is only lucrative for the commercial fur industry. in the final chapter, sorenson presents veganism as the only ethical choice when facing an industry bent on such cruelty and total disregard for the wellbeing of both animals and humans; an industry inflicting countless long-term harms on the environment in search of profit. however, his call for veganism as a (at least partial) solution fails in part due to the lack of addressing the shortcomings of following a vegan lifestyle without examining other forms of exploitation that, on its own, veganism does not address. problems surrounding grain production and other foods under capitalist industrial agriculture that are not animal based, for example. about canada: animal rights 162 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research where does veganism situate itself, in the resistance of not only animal exploitation but human exploitation as well, in the import of fruits and other foods from countries such as the philippines and costa rica grown under extremely oppressive, dangerous, and environmentally harmful conditions, not to mention the use of migrant labour in canada’s own fruit and vegetable production? sorenson’s call for veganism would have been much stronger had he clarified this point. nor does sorenson problematize his call for eco-tourism as an alternative to safari-style vacationing as a colonial practice in itself which often requires the appropriation and ‘clearing’ of land already in use by indigenous people in order to prepare it for viewing as a pristine wilderness. in my opinion, these are vital topics for discussion if we are not to simply trade one oppression for another in an attempt to, as sorenson himself would say, “salve our consciences.” that said, about canada: animal rights provides an excellent overview of this issue, as well as its far-reaching implications and vital place within the broader movement for social justice for all. whole book pdf 276 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism book review broke but unbroken: grassroots social movements and their radical solutions to poverty by augusta dwyer. winnipeg: fernwood publishing, 2011. $19.95 cad paperback. isbn: 9781552664063. pages: 1,169. reviewed by sabrina fernandes1 in broke but unbroken, augusta dwyer uses journalistic narratives to describe and examine stories of struggle, despair and success about four social movements: the landless rural workers movement (mst) in brazil, the peasant union of indonesia (spi), the indian alliance, and argentina’s national movement of factories recovered by workers (mnfrt). the title term “broke but unbroken” provides the synthesis of what the book sets out to do: identify the intersections of hopelessness and hope where grassroots social movements concentrate their efforts on diminishing poverty in a more sustainable and effective way than governments or aid institutions. by collecting personal anecdotes and situating them in the broader social and political context of social movement struggle against capitalism and globalization within their countries, she connects the four movements as they work towards what dwyer refers as imagining grassroots solutions to their daily struggle while promoting sustainable alternatives to problems created from local and global sources as a way to fight poverty rather than simply coping with it. a major theme throughout the book is how the movements are reconfiguring the way poverty has been approached by policymakers and aid institutions. dwyer emphasizes that the tactics of grassroots social movements are often misunderstood or misrepresented because of the way western society has been shaped to think about poverty: as something so complex only elite experts from government or global institutions can manage it. in fact, grassroots tactics are perceived as out of the ordinary because they combine methods of protest and resistance with the search for and implementation of sustainable solutions. one of the 1 sabrina fernandes is currently a ph.d. candidate in the department of sociology and anthropology, carleton univeristy. her research interests include brazilian politics, development and underdevelopment, gender issues, and education. book review: broke but unbroken | 277 ways this is done is through decentralized/horizontal decision-making, to which the author credits many of the success stories experienced by the movements. for the mst, decentralized decisions have been fundamental to the maintenance of such a diverse and widespread movement. the support for organic farming, for example, is a solution from below that has enabled mst farmers to keep afloat through small-scale organic production while avoiding the replication of the unsustainable industrial agricultural system they fight against. it is “production based on our values,” one member says in reference to the rejection of chemical pesticides and fertilizers while ensuring that members can make a living from farming with fair prices and distribution of land and resources. this is also reflected in the relationship between forest dwellers and the forest in indonesia. education is explored as another common element to grassroots movements’ strategies. more often than not, research on grassroots movements highlights how “raising awareness” is a priority but only superficially explores how movements’ organizational structure and their educational strategies are deeply entrenched. dwyer corrects this gap by analysing education as a fundamental strategy of grassroots movements that truly believe in participatory democracy and autonomy. for the mst, education is such an important tool that it has established its own schools, training centres, and universities (p.18). for the spi, the alliance between students and peasants strengthened their cause. in india, former slum dwellers take the role of educators in order to help others make a living and access secure housing (p. 89). for the mnfrt, education means access to training and information so that every worker has the knowledge to run the cooperatives (p.145). the book’s narratives are well analysed in a critique of capitalism and the impact of globalization on people’s right to food, water, housing, and job security are also complemented with secondary literature. these include references made both by dwyer and by the movement members themselves demonstrating how grassroots movements perceive the merging of theory and practice to be essential for the creation of alternatives. this shows how these movements’ strengths go beyond organizational capacity; an argument she notes has been promoted in neoliberal thought to disconnect poverty alleviation from the need to actually transform political and economic systems. she challenges this view by proposing that, for example in the case of peasant movements in brazil and indonesia, “through direct action and the physical taking of land, their members are challenging the definition of empowerment 278 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism that obscures the material basis of power” (p.78). instead of promoting “empowerment” through aid, structural adjustments, and even some forms of microcredit, which the author argues do not always address the root of the problem and fail to take into account particular traits of each society and culture (p. 99), grassroots movements link it to changing mindsets, stronger class-consciousness, and the continuous flow of support that comes from community solidarity. although it is easy for the reader to get lost in the personal anecdotes of movement members, dwyer’s narrative style is effective because it brings a human face back to the understanding of social movements. by shifting power to those telling their own stories, she creates counterframes to the ones promoted by opposing politicians and mainstream media. the book shows how it is in fact the innovation behind the movements’ methods and the way they reflect the consciousness of the millions of people represented that make the movements capable of building resilience even when it is hard to develop solutions to crises. the author demonstrates this through examples of creativity, solidarity and strength when groups find themselves at a critical point; when it is sí o sí (yes or yes), as an argentine factory worker put it. the combination of inventiveness, optimism, and altruism, which dwyer successfully highlights, works because it is so novel and unusual to strategies inherent to capitalist dominance associated with conformism to systematic poverty and inequality that it shakes its structures and creates positive new ways of thinking and producing. these alternatives contrast with traditional policies and government initiatives that the movements claim have not provided a long-term solution but simply a way to “manage their poverty better” (p.99). by presenting four grassroots movements from distinct parts of the world in a unifying way, dwyer shows that, despite their many differences and peculiarities they share similar strategies, visions, and even transnational networks of support. that is mostly because they share a common enemy centered on capitalism and globalization, although it takes many shapes: agribusinesses, hydroelectric dams, mining, colonial states, corruption, perverse laws, and even conservationists. the portrayal of how movements have confronted these forces shows that, in addition to direct action and similar strategies, it may be necessary to negotiate and compromise in order to guarantee a reasonable outcome for the membership. while dwyer shows some of these movements’ successful stories, she poses the question of whether their methods can be replicated and bring about positive returns in places other than book review: broke but unbroken | 279 the countries she explores. by interweaving the stories of other, some smaller, movements, she shows that replication is possible though their success can only be sustainable when shaped towards the need of a wide membership, which emerges when the movement favours ideas from below through horizontal decision-making based on collective needs, autonomy, and the principle of solidarity within grassroots organizing (p.21). but the question remains on whether the changes are sustainable. the author argues that as long as the economic system persists in creating poverty, the poor will keep fighting. the analysis of the cooperatives in argentina demonstrates the constant struggle with cycles of poverty and inequality and how crisis tends to return and create new vulnerabilities requiring movements to maintain their search for sustainable solutions to their problems in a way that prevents community gains from becoming losses. symposium on braverman comments by leo panitch i want to begin with a couple of comments on what braverman has accomplished. i think this is important because although burawoy began his paper and his talk with praise of braverman, by the time he's through with him, he's dragged him through what marx would call the "muck" . now, all of this puts me in an odd position because i have criticisms of braverman's work. i was struck, in coming into this room, by a resemblance to a court-chamber--the way we're sitting here, the way you're sitting there. and as i read burawoy's critique of braverman, i had the feeling that what was being engaged in here was a prosecution and that willy-nilly i was being cast into the role of the defence attorney. therefore, you may have to excuse me if what i say sounds like that to some extent, if i have to occasionally bring evidence into court, that is, the odd quotation, in order to salvage braverman from the critique which we just heard.. in order to counter the critique, i think one has to note braverman's achievements, the ones that haven't been noted. first of all, braverman has brought us back to a proper appreciation of what marx meant by the tendency to emiseration. those embourgeoisement theorists who thought that marx meant by this the increasing material impoverishment of workers simply did not know what they were talking about. on the contrary, marx saw capitalism as constantly, through its restless striving after the general forms of wealth, driving labour out beyond the limits of its natural needs and producing the material elements needed for the development of the rich individualityreplacing natural needs with needs that were historically produced. in other words, capital was itself constantly redefining subsistence at higher levels. what emiseration meant for marx in this context was 15 alternate routes something different. it was what braverman describes as the degradation of work, and marx put it extremely well in turns of capitalists establishing "the accumulation of misery corresponding to the accumulation of capital". and what he means by that is the accumulation of wealth at one pole is therefore at the same time the accumulation of misery expressed in marx's terms as "the agony of toil, slavery, ignorance, brutality, mental degradation at the opposite pole, i.e. on the side of the class that produces its own product in the form of capital". that's what marx meant by the tendency to emiseration, and what braverman has done is salvage this definition for our own time. well, braverman also has done more than this, and one of the ways in which people who look at braverman have done him injustice is that they see the book as a book on the labour process. it's much more than that, its central core, its intent, to begin with, was to identify the structure of the working class, and the manner in which it had changed. if you read the first page of braverman's introduction, that's what he set out to do. he makes it clear that in the process of trying to look at occupational shifts, that is, between occupations and within occupations, he became aware of a contradiction in the literature between an argument that went something to the effect that modern work required higher levels of education, training, mental effort, etc., and a simultaneous argument that work was subdivided into petty tasks, petty operations, that are mundane, alienating, and so on. braverman found no attempt to reconcile those two processes. so he began to look for a dynamic which would explain the evolution of labour processes within occupations as well as between them, and this led him to stress the evolution of management and technology, of the modern corporation as well as of social structure. he found himself doing a history of the capitalist mode of production over the last hundred 16 symposium on braverman years. but this does not mean that his central concern was lost in the process. it's no accident that the last third of the book is concerned with the mapping-out of the structure of the modern working class, in the context of his examination of the dynamics of proletarianization. he arrives at part iv, at this point, and what he gives us is something not dissimilar to the kinds of mapping we receive from kinds of recent marxist theoreticians like carchedi or even erik olin wright. but unlike their work, he provides us not merely with a mapping which is deductively arrived at, but one which is also empirically and inductively arrived at. as a result, his mapping is much more detailed and richer; it has meat on it if you will. we will remember that the critique begins at the level of a divorce between evaluation and criticism, a divorce between "science" and critique in braverman, with the statement that in marx, these two things are combined, and i think that's very true and it's an important insight—probably the person who has given the best expression of that insight in marx is norman geras . and what he was getting at was the argument that marxism as a critique is not a moral critique, not an ethical critique; it doesn't take its standpoint in that sense from a set of values--it is scientific, and insofar as it attempts to get at the essence of things rather than the appearance of things, it cuts away mythology, ideology in the false sense, and establishes criticism by counteracting mythology and ideology. his criticism is therefore based on uncovering the essence of reality and it doesn't depend on a moral or ethical stance. i don't think braverman does in fact base his criticism of capitalism on a moral stance, but bases it on his attempt to uncover the dynamics of proletarianization in capitalism. moreover, i don't think one avoids the problem that burawoy seems to think braverman has by stepping out of capitalism. the whole 17 alternate routes problematic of speaking of inside and outside of capitalism in terms of points of view for us today is very bothersome. it's very difficult to imagine that we, living in a capitalist society, can step outside of capitalism when we try to define feudalism. we define those elements of feudalism that appear to us important vis-a-vis capitalism; we never step outside of capitalism (that seems to me an essential point in the sociology of knowledge). moreover, what burawoy gives us is a very ideal-typical definition of feudalism, one which-really i think would apply to all pre-capitalist formations, and not to feudalism itself. braverman would reject an attempt to understand the contrasts between feudalism and capitalism in ideal-typical terms; he in fact says very clearly and explicitly in his introduction that the same productive forces that are characteristic of the close of one epoch of social relations are also characteristic of the opening of the succeeding epoch. it is not a matter of craft production not being there in feudalism and suddenly being there in capitalism--in that sense braverman is both developing his point of view, if you like, from feudalism and from capitalism. what he is talking about is not the craft worker per se; what he is talking about is the paradox that labour is a commodity (labour-power is a commodity) that can't be separated from its owner. that's what he's talking about; and what capitalism has to do in treating labour-power as a commodity is in some way attempt to attenuate, although it can never remove, that indissoluble connection between labour-power and the individual to whom it belongs. a second point that burawoy made is a critique of braverman for treating class as an objective rather than a subjective category. i think that if one reads braverman carefully, one sees that an attack on braverman for not seeing class as class formation is a •traw man. braverman makes very clear that he doesn't want to 18 symposium on braverman deprecate the importance of the study of the state of consciousness of the working class, since it is only through consciousness that a class becomes an actor on the historic stage class consciousness is that state of social cohesion reflected in the understanding and activities of a class or portion of a class. its absolute expression is a pervasive and durable attitude on the part of a class toward its position in society. its long-term relative expression is found in the slowly changing traditions, experiences, education, and organization of the class. its short-term relative expression is a dynamic complex of moods and sentiments affected by circumstances and changing with them, sometimes in periods of stress and conflict, almost from day to day. a class, cannot exist in society without in some degree manifesting a consciousness of itself as a group, with common problems, interests and prospects, although this manifestation may for long periods be weak, confused and subject to manipulation by other classes. (braverman, 1974: 29, 30). so i think that the conception that braverman has is very much of a class as an historical actor. but what he is saying, is that in order to understand and examine empirically that class, one has to begin with a certain mapping, in order to know what to look for. przeworski , in his important paper on class formations, ends up by agreeing with this, but giving us a very crude mapping—industrial workers , white collar workers, bourgeoisie, will do. but what braverman gives us is a rich mapping, which marks out the paths to follow much more clearly. so again i think that the criticism is misconceived. there is another criticism of braverman--he doesn't talk enough about class struggle. clearly, this is part of our problem, which wasn't braverman 's problem (he didn't live in a university). in isolation, we have a need to shout class struggle from the rooftops in terms of understanding society. braverman has an understanding of society's dynamic being composed of class struggle so deep that it suffuses his work and he doesn't constantly have to keep crying class struggle. i think that if you read braverman (this is not new--many 19 alternate routes people have made this criticism of braverman) this criticism can be avoided. rather than, as burawoy suggests, seeing workers' responses to taylorism being merely impotent resistance, or simply internal friction, braverman makes it clear that it doesn't have that view at all. braverman points out that taylorism raised a storm of opposition among trade unions during the early part of the century, and then he goes on to quote, after discussing that opposition, a long passage from the international moulders journal in which he shows that the moulders understood perfectly what was happening to them. when he later speaks of internal friction, (and he doesn't use the term "mere" friction) he first makes clear that the pace of production is decided in a practice which' largely assumes the form of a struggle, whether organized or not. braverman very clearly has this image of class struggle taking place, not only and maybe even not so much, given his american context, at the level of the central organizations of the unions, at the level of the national civic federation in the nineteenth century, but at the level of the shopfloor in day-to-day struggle. and it's interesting how he's able to use taylor to make his own case in this regard, because his quotations from taylor are full of the class struggle (soldiering, etc.). burawoy argues that braverman doesn't have a concept of contradiction; at best it's only there in passing. to some extent i think this is true, in the sense that the contradiction that braverman identifies apart from class struggle is the gap between potential which exists in modern capitalism, and the actuality that we experience. but the irony of burawoy 's points with regard to contradiction, is that of the eclecticism that he indicates by referring to certain neo-marxists who do use the concept of contradiction. he refers to habermas and offe and others who have decided that the working class is not an 20 symposium on braverman element in the contradiction any longer, who identify contradiction at the highly abstract levels of legitimacy crises in the sense that crises then always beset capitalism. even the best of the works based on this, like o'connor, give very little play to the actual class struggle. sure, you can identify contradictions, the question is to what extent can you operationalize them in terms of being able to understand whether a society will in fact evolve in a certain direction or not. and it's interesting that the theoretical framework that burawoy adopts in terms of understanding capitalism and in terms of his critique of braverman, is that of understanding how capitalism in a concrete way reproduces itself. i think that is very important and it's one of the great contributions of the structuralist (marxist) developments. but i wonder whether, by simply looking at the way capitalism reproduces itself, we don't fall into the same error that parsons or parsons and shils fell into. parsons and chils argued that by understanding the way in which the system maintained itself, one could also understand the conditions for change. all one can understand, if the system doesn't reproduce itself, is breakdown; one doesn't understand conditions of transformation, by simply studying maintenance. and there's no doubt that one of the great problems with the structuralists, even the structuralists like poulantzas, is that they don't establish the conditions for change in any sense. they are simply talking, in a very functionalist way, of outcomes rather than purpose at the centre of their analysis, of how the state comes in to plug the gaps, the contradictions that develop in the system. one final point on socialist machines, and then i'll shut up. i think that in a sense burawoy 's onto something here, in what is i think an important section of the paper, but i'm not sure one can lay apathy on braverman, the kind of neutral view of technology that is 21 alternate routes suggested in the latter part of the paper. i don't think one can hang on braverman the conception that technology is neutral, that machines are neutral. braverman makes it very clear in the beginning of his work that the treatment of the interplay between forces and relations of production occupied marx in almost all of his historical writings, and while there is no question that he gave primacy to the forces of production in the long sweep of history, the idea that this primacy on a day-to-day basis could be used in a formalistic way in the analysis of history would never have entered his mind. within the historical, analytical limits of capitalism, according to marxist analysis, technology instead of simply producing social relations, is produced by social relations represented by capital. the concrete and determinate forms of society are indeed "determined" rather than accidental , but this is the determinacy of the thread-by-thread weaving of the fabric of history, not the imposition of external formulas... every society is a moment in the historical process, and can be grasped only as part of that process. capitalism, a social form, when it exists in time, space, population, and history, weaves a web of myriad threads; the conditions of its existence form a complex network each of which presupposes many others. it is because of this solid and tangible existence, this concrete form produced by history, no part of which may be changed by artificial suppositions without doing violence to its true mode of existence it is precisely because of this that it appears to us as "natural," "inevitable", and "eternal". and it is only in this sense, as a fabric woven over centuries, that we may say that capitalism "produced" the present capitalist mode of production. this is a far cry from a ready-made formula which enables us to "deduce" from a given state of technology a given mode of social organization. (braverman, 1974: 21, 22). braverman clearly argues here that technology is a product of social relations, and i think he is arguing, at least implicitly, that the bringing about of socialism involves not only the changing of social relations, but the changing of machines in the process, and his discussion of the soviet union yields this interpretation. 22 mature marx: the case against an epistemological break by jan mayer "the philosophers have only interpreted the world differently, the point is, to change it" 1 this quotation, taken along with marx's other theses on feuerbach, such as his critique of "contemplative materialism" as stopping at isolated man or human essence conceived of outside the aggregate of social relations and objective activity, sums up his attitude to idealist philosophy in general, as well as his dissatisfaction with feuerbach 's anthropological humanism. his was from the beginning 2 a "revolt against the rule of thoughts. , an attempt to turn hegel on his head" as he stated in his critique of hegel's philosophy of right; that is, to rescue what were valuable insights from idealism and to put these in the context of a materialist philosophy. the left hegelians such as feuerbach thought that merely by reinterpreting the world they would solve the problems of idealist philosophy; marx's intent was not only to criticize philosophy but to criticize and to change the real world. marx's sea thing attack on idealism was prompted by the way in which material existence and social consciousness were treated. in hegel, they were mere epiphenomena, emanations of the progress of the world, or absolute, spirit or mind through various stages of its development to its ultimate state (the thesis-antithesis-synthesis), the "really real" to hegel was not "real individuals, their o activity and the material conditions under which they live , not real flesh and blood men, but an abstraction which existed purely in the transcendental realm of reason. marx's materialist antidote to hegel's idealism was found through political economy.'* it is the purpose of this short essay to examine the ways in which this element is retained and developed throughout marx's career and to argue that despite various more systematic and scientific reworkings, many of the important categories of analysis were retained. there are both continuities and discontinuities between the "early" and the "mature" marx, but no epistemological break, contrary to what has been argued particularly by althusserian structuralists. these lines of development are especially evident in the following items: marx's method, including dialectics; his 135 alternate routes treatment of the conditions underlying alienation; and related to this, the way in which he perceives the structure of capitalist society and works his way from "surface phenomena" such as markets, competition, etc. in the early works, to a mature analysis of the hidden mechanisms underpinning them. there are three important and central components in capital which not only represent an advance over marx's earlier analysis of capitalism but also serve as keys to the continuities at the heart of marx's concerns. these three interconnected concepts are: the relations of production, surplus value, and the commodity. the "relation" may be thought of as a basic unit of reality: it is a unity of contradictory parts, and the notion of "contradiction" and "totality" are joined in marx's use of the dialectical method. the mode of production subsumes two types of conditions: means, or forces, of production, and social relations of production; the relations of production under capital unite two antagonistic social actors, the capitalist and the labourer, who are of necessity in conflict because of their relationship in the creation and appropriation of surplus value. it is through the historical conditions which make this appropriation possible that the worker is exploited and his labour alienated from him as labourpo^er , an abstract commodity which has the unique property of producing values greater than itself which then enter into the exchange process and add to the accumulation of capital, under the control of the capitalist who has rights of disposition over capital and labour. the "commodity" (in the special sense intended by marx) is a unique product of capitalism, combining within itself the unity of use-value and exchange-value, with exchange-value becoming the dominant force in the development of the capitalist mode of production. together, surplus value aid the commodity are keys to understanding the structure of capitalist society, taken in context with the social relations of production. these concepts will be elaborated upon in the course of the ensuing discussion. let us first exanine the concept of alienation as it is used in the early economic and philosophic manuscripts and through this analysis, indicate in what form the concept remains in marx's mature political economy. it may be recalled that marx had objected to feuerbach's analysis of religion as being a projection 136 mature marx and reification of man's reflection of himself in an idealized form, a creation not recognized by its creator. this was for marx too psychological a model and said nothing about the relationship between man and his material conditions which were at the basis of all such idealized productions of which religion (the separation between man and his creation, the creation standing over against him as an alien force) was the exemplar. it is at this point that marx's anthropology or ontology (the nature of man and being), his materialist philosophy and his borrowed categories of political economy converge to produce an explanation of alienation. it is because man is an "active, sensual being" in nature that man necessarily realizes himself and his fellow actors only in and by acting on nature—by producing the means of his subsistence. through this activity man refines his human capacities and produces objects which reflect himself (man thus "makes" himself and, in co-operation with others, makes a human, social world). however, under certain historical conditions, the connection between productive activity and the objects of production are lost, and these objects come to take on a separate, hostile existence: under the conditions of division of labour and private property. those who control the means by which men produce their world control both the men and their products; under capitalism, therefore, the worker becomes separated from these and as a consequence, becomes estranged from his fellow men, from himself, and from his true human nature or "species-being". thus the concept of alienation refers to an objective set of conditions caused by particular material arrangements. they involve a producer, a means and an object of production, and an appropriator of these in a set of property relations. these are the elements which appear in rudimentary form in the early writings of marx. in his mature works, he develops in detail the mechanisms which link appropriation, exploitation and accumulation— and the word alienation, but not the sense of the concept, disappears. marx wrote the manuscripts in 1844, the _german ideology in 1846, and he subsequently repudiated most of what he had written as "unscientific." in 1851 he began more intensive study of ricardo although had not yet developed the full implications of 137 alternate routes surplus value. the notebooks towards a critique of political economy (the grundrisse) were written between 1857 and 1858 and are generally acknowledged as representing a "watershed" between marx's early and mature works. contained within them are the elements which would later appear in capital , and it was at this time that marx realized his previous analysis had dealt only with the appearances, the "surface phenomena" of political economy and the structure of capitalist society. earlier, he had treated labour as any other commodity--now he realized its special nature, and this was linked to the creation of surplus value which now was to become the basis of the theory of capitalist accumulation. the extraction of surplus value under the conditions of capitalist domination becomes the motor of the process in which the world comes to be dominated by impersonal exchange relationships. labourpower , as an abstract general category, and money, become the universal solvents by which all things are reduced to equivalents, made mobile and exchangeable, and make the growing accumulation of capital possible. these conditions, however, presuppose historical developments whereby all personal ties, as in feudalism, have been sundered; persons and things have become freed to enter into a system of exchange relations, and a formally free labour force created to enter into contractual relationships with capital, exchanging labourpower for wage-money. however, this is an unequal exchange ev^n if on the surface it appears equal, since labourpower, the unique commodity, creates wealth which is under the control of capitalists. by causing the worker to labour part of the day for the capitalist and only part of the day for himself, conditions are created in which stored-up value adds to the wealthaccumulating capacity of capital when the circuits of production and circulation are completed. hence, as the worker creates more wealth, he becomes more impoverished relative to it--capital, embodying the creative power alienated from him. stands as an alien power over him which grows with the growth of capital. accumulation becomes an end in itself, and the commodity becomes "fetishized" . it is thus in his analysis of th? turning of labour into the commodity labourpower by its separation from the labourer that 138 mature marx marx's analysis of surplus value relates to his earlier analysis of alienation-the term is now "exploitation." earlier, marx saw the relationship between man and his world as one in which productive activity mediates between the individual and the external world as the means by which he appropriates objects. under capitalism, labour and other elements become "abstractions" (that is, the links are severed). alienation implies the breakdown or sundering of a unity of interconnected elements (as oilman, in his 1971 book alienation, points out). in capital , it is now evident that as activity goes through its metamorphosis into value, to be expressed as money, commodities, etc., these become fetishized and take on a life of their own, expressing in distorted fashion the original relation. man's relationship to his world (which includes other men) is now mediated by the abstractions created under capitalism, just as capitalists and labourers, or buyers and sellers in the marketplace, now relate to one another only indirectly, through the mediation of exchange-value. private property (which marx originally saw as the cause of alienation) is now recognized by him as only one form of value and that more fundamental are the conditions which create surplus value and exchange value. let us now turn to an examination of dialectics, another element in marx's development which exhibits both continuity between early and late works and was also from the very beginning, entirely different from hegel's idealistphilosophy use of it. marx's dialectics is both historical-materialist and treats contradictions differently—he does not merely "turn hegel upside down" by converting idealism to materialism. in his early usage, marx corrected hegel by making history "march on its feet" instead of in the airy realm of pure reason; his principal concern was with the contradiction between bourgeoisie and proletariat and the way in which modes of production develop historically through the conflictual supercession of previous forms and social relations. in the mature works, marx adds to this the notion of contradiction within capital itself, as between productive forces (as they develop through the socialization of accumulation and production in large-scale units), and the private ownership of those forces, that is, as godelier p.its it, between two structures, production and ownership. 139 alternate routes dialectics did not originate with hegel but in greek usage, the combined "dia" and "logos" meaning "to reason by splitting in two", of phenomena which are split, their elements in clashing opposition . from the beginning, there was implied in the notion of dialectics a world in flux, moving, changing and transforming into its opposite. the world is conceived of as a unity of opposites in contradiction with one another, even if at any particular "moment" appearances seem static and in harmony. this conception was adopted both by hegel and by marx. however, marx rejected hegel's progress of an "independent objective mind" and posited instead the movement of history through human subjects actively creating and changing their world. there is no ultimate reality which transcends passive humans and proceeds in mechanical and subjectless fashion; rather, to marx, contradictions and conflicts which move history are within and between human actors and structural elements which they have created but which nevertheless condition and limit them at any one point. this unity in contradiction which is material reality also has production as its basis, grasped via the categories not of philosophy but of political economy. components are related together internally in a totality, a set of circumstances which are the products of historical processes and which determine at any point the conceptual status of elements within that totality. it is for these reasons that the starting point of the scientific method in marxian political economy must be fundamentally different from that of idealist philosophy. as nicolaus comments: "unlike hegel's logic, and unlike marx's own initial attempts earlier, th~is beginning begins not with a pure, indeterminate, eternal and universal abstraction, but rather with a compound, determinate, delimited and concrete whole..." ("foreword" to the 1973 pelican grundrisse ; and see "the method of political economy", marx, grundrisse ) a significant example in the mature marx's work of the particular and "delimited" concrete entity is the commodity as central to understanding what is unique and crucial about the mechanisms of capitalist society. it makes possible the analysis of value which contains within it the unity of two contradictory elements, usevalue and exchangevalue, with the latter dominating, just as there is in capitalist society as a whole a "unity in domination" of 140 mature marx capital and labour, bourgeoisie and proletariat. beginning the analysis with a particular concrete entity such as the commodity, illustrates that the unity of production and consumption is not direct and immediate, but is part of a process linked to other conditions, as nicolaus points out. in other words, we are not concerned with the universal qualities of production and consumption as they would be useful in analysing any and all societies, but rather, with historically specific ones, those under conditions which create and sustain capitalist society. the commodity represents the essence of the uniqueness of the historical product, capitalism, because it contains within it all of the other contradictions of the capitalist mode of production. as marx proceeded with his detailed study of political economy in the grundrisse notebooks, nicolaus (1973) observes, his methodological approach changed: one must not work up from simple, general, abstract relations to complex particular wholes, but from the particular to the general, an essential difference between idealist and materialist dialectics. this has implications for the role of "abstraction" as a methodological procedure. as keat and urry (1975) point out, marx was not a positivist—he wished to lay bare the internal structure of the capitalist mode of production and society, hidden workings which are related together internally and not readily observable in appearances or isolated "social facts": his was a "realist" conception. social reality could therefore be understood only by examining both parts and whole, both concrete facts and abstract categories, by a process of moving back and forth between them in order to reach closer and closer approximations to the nature of this reality in its historical specificity. the process of abstraction involves a reduction of pheno.nena to their "pure form" in order to grasp how particular processes are worked out and interrelated (and to separate out residues of previous forms which have not yet been superceded). thus, for example, the significance of the spinning jenny cannot be understood unless we know the context in which it is located in the relations of production; similarly, labour takes on a particular meaning because of the social relations in which it is embedded: the subordination of labour to capital and the domination of the commodity form of value. 141 alternate routes the contention made by such theorists as althusser that there was a break between the early "ideological" and "philosophical" marx and the mature "scientific" marx is, therefore, misleading, as well as incorrect. marx was throughout his career both a materialist philosophically and an empiricist scientifically (and it could be added, an "enlightenment child" who did not see the problems with scientificity that concern us today). the early marx was interested in uncovering the false or reified nature of notions by relating them to the material conditions of existence; the mature marx with examining the hidden mechanisms of capitalism. at both points in his development, he was therefore interested in what was in the world of appearance not readily apparent but hidden and examinable only through scientific categories. philosophy (as a bourgeois activity) was for marx unscientific; the nature of reality, society and history had to be examined scientifically--it could be said, then, that as he developed he merely became more scientific, more systematic. although he recognized individuals as the creators of their social world and history, at no point did he ever begin from purposive action of individual actors. he did not begin, that is, from presuppositions of a psychologistic utilitarianism, but began, rather. from the structured unity in which actions were to be understood. unlike functionalism, however, this unity was one of inherent contradictions, and it is this point which links the notions of "dialectics" and "totality." thus, marx's theoretical and methodological approaches separate him from both idealism and utilitarianism on the one hand, and also from positivistic social science and functionalism on the other. to sum up, there are a number of continuities (despite differences in terminology and focus) which link the ^arly and mature marx, despite some discontinuities which may legitimately be considered of a developmental kind: 1) society is the product of struggle between man and nature and between groups of men, with material conditions (economic organization, means of subsistence) as the focal point of this struggle. 2) since "man makes himself" through his activities, knowledge of society must be concerned both with action and with objective 142 mature marx conditions in which actions occur; they are not merely epiphenomenal of a hidden "ultimate reality." 3) society is a structure of interrelated parts in which social processes containing contradictory elements generate conflicts — society and history are therefore to be analysed in dynamic and dialectical terms in the context of specific objective conditions. 4) "false consciousness," "alienation", or "reification" are processes which contribute to masking the true nature of social relations, products and society from their creators and arise because of those social relations and products in particular societal contexts. philosophy, religion, and the "fc-tishism of commodities" are examples of masked and misunderstood processes. 143 austerity and aboriginal communities | 207 austerity and aboriginal communities: an interview with david newhouse — carlo fanelli carlo fanelli1 (cf): the public service alliance of canada (psac) has suggested that the 2012 canadian federal budget “is true to conservative governments course of assimilating the aboriginal population by making life in aboriginal communities unbearable.”2 psac points to the fact that the budget has done little if nothing to address housing issues faced by indigenous peoples and is subsequently continuing a trend of inequality thereby subtly forcing indigenous communities to assimilate in attempts to escape impoverished conditions. to what extent would you agree with such a proposition? if so, in what ways is the current budget a continuation of past attempts to assimilate indigenous communities in canada? david newhouse3 (dn): the 2012 budget provides limited funding for services such as education and community infrastructure, primarily improvements to reserve water systems. there are no additional funds to address the chronic housing problems nor to assist those who wish to pursue post secondary education. as we all know, one of the keys to effective labour market participation is a high level of education. without adequate support for primary and secondary education, the graduation 1 carlo fanelli is a ph.d. candidate at the department of sociology & anthropology, carleton university, with interests in critical political economy, labour studies, canadian public policy, social movements, urban sociology and education. in addition to serving as editor of alternate routes: a journal of critical social research, his work has appeared in socialist studies, journal of critical education policy studies, new proposals: journal of marxism and interdisciplinary inquiry, as well as the bullet, mrzine and labor notes. 2 public service alliance of canada. (2012). impact of the 2012 budget on aboriginal peoples. http://www.psac-afpc.com/news/2012/issues/20120417-e.shtml 3 david newhouse is chair of the indigenous studies department, and associate professor of business administration at trent university. his works include improving the aboriginal quality of life: changing the public policy paradigm, from woundedness to resilience: urban aboriginal health, hidden in plain sight: aboriginal contributions to canada, not strangers in these parts: urban aboriginal peoples and well-being in the urban aboriginal community. 208 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism rate will not improve and without increased support for those who make it to post secondary education, fewer will be able to continue. the lack of adequate funding makes it difficult to break from the cycle of poverty that exists in many aboriginal communities. despite land claim agreements and other types of agreement, most researchers and policy analysts agree that the current level of funding is considerably below what is needed to close the gap in social and economic conditions between aboriginal peoples and canadians. the cuts to the aboriginal health organizations removes an important set of actors from the policy advice circle. at a time when all of the indicators tell us that increased attention to aboriginal health services are important, it doesn’t make sense to remove the source of advice that can assist in the effective and efficient spending of funding on aboriginal health. the removal of an independent aboriginal voice, effective to a modern canadian democracy, means that aboriginal people lose the ability to affect government policy and participate effectively in the design and delivery of their own programs in this extremely important area. as to the issue of assimilation, i think that this process is more complex. certainly governments can require certain types of organizational behaviours and structures from their funding partners but that doesn’t mean that aboriginal people are assimilated if they adhere to them. there is an incredible movement within aboriginal communities to use ideas, practices, theories, etc from our own intellectual heritage as the basis for everyday life, including organizational and community lives. what is important is that the thinking of organizational actors is aboriginal and that thought is translated into appropriate action. two of the foundational ideas of indigenous thought are transformation and adaptability. the truth test for indigenous knowledge is whether or not it works in real life; does it help one to survive? this allows for change and adaptation while remaining aboriginal. we see this in the remarkable resurgence of traditional ideas being brought back into everyday life. assimilation occurs when one stops thinking in aboriginal terms. i’ll tell you a story from one of my first year classes a decade ago. we were reading a paper on the introduction of iron pots into mi’kmaq culture in the 16th and 17th centuries. some of the non-indigenous students argued that the mi’kmaq should not have used the pots since it changed their way of life and was not ‘traditional.’ a mi’kmaq student in the class spoke up, after a lengthy debate: but we liked the pots. they austerity and aboriginal communities | 209 made life easier for us. using the pots didn’t make us any less mi’kmaq. they strengthened us by enabling us to do more things easier. my views on assimilation and that of the students were challenged and changed in this instant. the history of aboriginal people is filled with similar adaptations and yet we remain aboriginal (of all types). yes, life has changed and we have adapted, just like other cultures around the world. the real problem around assimilation is the homogenization that is occurring as a result of the dominance of north american modernity and the market, which are proving to be remarkably powerful forces. cf: recent focus on attawapiskat has caused much of the canadian public to become aware of the impoverished conditions apparent on a number of reserves and has highlighted the significant disparities in wealth and income between indigenous and non-indigenous communities. to some extent, this renewed interest in attawapiskat and elsewhere has compelled the canadian government to develop new strategies for tackling poverty amongst indigenous peoples both on and off the reserve. to what extent are these challenges rooted in the failure of earlier policies and have there been any major shifts in policy orientation? dn: the conditions that created attawapiskat-like situations are myriad and are rooted in canada’s colonial history, the indian act and government paternalism, the establishment of indian reserves outside the economic space of canada, the continued racism towards aboriginal peoples, and a lack of adequate funding for local government services including education and job training. in addition, the funding regulations for indian bands did not provide for much local discretion in shifting funds to meet local needs as they emerged and changed over the course of a funding cycle. while first nations councils now have some increases in flexibility and a higher modicum of local control, in reality, demands for higher level of accountability from governments (both federal and provincial) effectively remove this control and the cycle of colonial administration continues, albeit in a different guise. in the economic area, the focus is now on success and helping those who are most likely to be successful. the new aboriginal economic development framework is based on neo-liberal principles, providing assistance to those who need it least and leaving those who need it the most behind. we seem to be moving towards a policy that emphasizes the market as a primary vehicle for the way in which individuals participate in 210 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism society. the emphasis on individual participation is at odds with the collectivist nature of much of aboriginal society. it will be a challenge for aboriginal communities to develop institutions that can effectively mediate between these two approaches. without them, and lacking the high levels of education needed to effectively participate in the market, i have great fears that the economic and social divide will continue to widen. the playing field isn’t level yet. cf: although the 2012 budget has been presented as being focused on providing more educational opportunities for aboriginal children, the canadian coalition for the rights of children4 (ccrc) has argued that the budget fails to recognize the importance of early education and is ignoring the needs of canada’s youngest generation. although the government has assigned $275 million over three years for both literacy and for the building of new schools, do you think that they are failing to address the earlier educational needs of indigenous children? moreover, the funds have only been provided for elementary school education rather than high school or post-secondary education, so in addition to neglecting early educational needs it seems as if the government is also failing to encourage later educational opportunities. what might the consequences of this be both in the short and long term? dn: what we fail to recognize is that education is a system of institutions that include more than schools and local education programs. for the system to function well, all aspects of it need to well designed and adequately funded. funding for classroom teaching is important but also needs to be supplemented by other activities these days: local school boards/committees that bring local control and parents into governance activities of schools, breakfast and lunch programs for students who often come from low income families, academic assistance such as tutors, mentors and guidance counselors, important cultural elements such as elders, traditional teachers and language teachers which help to provide a sense of pride in one’s own heritage and culture. one also needs capital funding to ensure that schools are up to date and well maintained. learning in outdated schools or poorly maintained ones doesn’t do much to improve success. it is also important to have parents involved in meaningful ways in their children’s education. the consequences of not adequately funding edu4 canadian coalition for the rights of children. (2012). right in principle, right in practice. http://rightsofchildren.ca/wp-content/uploads/ccrc-report-to-un-on-crc.pdf austerity and aboriginal communities | 211 cation means lower graduation rates, lower labour force participation rates, lower incomes and an inability to contribute to canada at ones potential. as the aboriginal population grows, additional resources for social assistance are required, at funding levels higher than the cost of the initial educational investment. cf: the ccrc has also raised concern that the budget has allocated no new funds or resources to address youth rehabilitation. to the contrary, among prime minister stephen harper’s first tasks since gaining a majority government in 2011 has been to introduce bill c-10 which among other things eliminates conditional sentences for minor and property offenders and instead mandates mandatory minimum sentences. a plethora of research has shown that such an approach is not only counter-productive but actually intensifies the very problems they allegedly seek to solve.5 as a consequence, this has resulted in the canadian civil liberties association and canadian bar association, among other groups, opposing the implementation of such legislation.6 given that aboriginal youth make up only 5 percent of the overall canadian youth population but are disproportionately represented in canadian prisons at 28 percent of the population, what kind of impact will this lack of rehabilitative funds have on indigenous communities? does this threaten to further victimize the vulnerable? dn: the budget changes and bill c-10 make it likely that the level of incarceration of aboriginal youth will continue at its same level and even more likely that it will grow. the mandatory minimum sentences mean that more aboriginal youth (and others) will serve time; the loss of rehabilitative funds increases the possibility of re-offending upon release. one could analyze the effects through two lenses: the first is a loss of community productive capacity as a disproportionate number of aboriginal youth are removed; the second is through the lens of community safety as the cycle continues as youth return to communities after custody. the loss of funding for rehabilitative services also means a shift in philosophy away from restoration and rehabilitation towards deterrence and punishment. given the gains made over the last two decades in trying to bring aboriginal ideas into the justice system and the move towards restorative justice practices, it appears that the system would 5 for an introductory overview see barken, s.e. and g.j. bryjak. (2011). fundamentals of criminal justice: a sociological view, 2nd edition. toronto: jones and bartlett learning. 6 the ccla has called bill c-10 “unwise, unjust, unconstitutional.” see http://ccla.org/ omnibus-crime-bill-c-10/ 212 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism become less amicable to aboriginal peoples rather than more. cf: one of the most contentious issues emerging from the 2012 federal budget has been to grant the canada revenue agency and other federal departments the power to withdraw the tax-free status as well as government grants from charities that are involved in so-called political activities. environmental groups, in particular, have been singled-out by federal minister of the environment, peter kent, for having been accused of money laundering, illegal activities and ubiquitous with radicals and terrorists. given the intimate relationship between many indigenous communities and canadian charities, as well as efforts intent on, for instance, limiting the reckless development of the alberta tar sands, destructive resources extraction on first nations lands or broader issues related to climate change, how might such changes have potentially damaging affects for first nations communities and issues related to social justice? dn: as a society i think we have moved in a direction that criminalizes dissent. dissent itself is defined quite broadly as any criticism or opposition to the government positions. this is dangerous territory and goes against the foundations of an liberal democratic society. it creates a climate of fear where groups of citizens are unwilling to speak their mind and advance their views as part of the public policy process. since aboriginal peoples have been subject to public debate restrictions in the past and have successfully found ways to advance their views, i would anticipate that aboriginal leaders and organizations will continue to advance their views, even at the risk of having their funding cut or affairs investigated. threats of interrogation and the like have not been effective in the past at silencing aboriginal voices. there has been much effort at building alliances with non-aboriginal groups over the last few decades on social justice issues. i would forecast that the attempts at labeling criticism dissent would not be effective and might have the opposite effect of creating more alliance and more pointed criticism and action. the groups who might be most affected are those who have charitable status and who are engaged in advocacy work that is considered critical of government policy. cf: in from wounded to resilient, you argue that the indigenous community needs to become aware of the ongoing colonial discourse that constructs indigenous people as ‘wounded’, causes them to remain reliant and restricts their ability to become aware of their own agency. if i understand you correctly, you argue that a collective consciousness needs to be developed in austerity and aboriginal communities | 213 order for indigenous communities to see themselves as resilient. given the economic crisis and harper’s cuts to many social services that aboriginal and non-aboriginal communities often depend on in terms of health, welfare and so on, do you think that this process has been restricted? in your view has the economic crisis constrained this process of ‘healing’? how might these cuts have continued this notion of ‘woundedness’ or prevented indigenous communities from moving past this stereotype? dn: good question. will the reduction or loss of government funding stop the healing process? it may slow certain aspects of it down but i don’t think that it will be stopped as its essential core doesn’t depend upon government funding. the developing resilience i think will be able to find new ways to address some of the problems. my major concern is for those who are the most vulnerable and the most wounded who need specialized supports and attention. we seem to have forgotten about them and it is clear that the institutional support will not be available. aboriginal people have always lived in a polarized environment with sharp differences in economic and social conditions. reducing this distance is a national challenge which the state has been reluctant to take up, except on its own terms. aboriginal peoples have articulated over and over again what they believe needs to be done to reduce the economic and social distance as well as bring them into confederation. the best articulation of an aboriginal vision of canada is the final report of the royal commission on aboriginal peoples. it forms the foundation of contemporary aboriginal political action on many fronts. it’s aim is to reduce the polarization. the question in my own mind is whether or not canadians can deal with a ‘healed’ indian. so much of our public policy effort is based upon the notion of woundedness. this is not to say that there is not genuine poverty and social dislocation that needs addressing. can we support aboriginal led efforts as i believe that healing comes also from doing things for oneself. i was struck by the results of the environics urban aboriginal peoples study that indicated that 100 percent of those interviewed had experienced discrimination and racism in their lives and had to a large extent decided that there was nothing they could do about it and so were getting on with living with it.7 it was an astounding finding for the year 2011 but it is illustrative of the complex environment that we live in. a recent ipso-reid poll also showed that most canadians 7 environics. (2010). urban aboriginal peoples study. http://www.uaps.com 214 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism believe that aboriginal peoples get too much from government.8 a part of the issue as i see it changing the attitudes of non-aboriginal canadians so that they can find a way to live comfortably with us. cf: in an era of unprecedented austerity and continuing economic insecurity, what are some of the major challenges facing first nations communities that have yet to garner the serious media, academic and popular attention that is warranted? in what ways are health care, housing and other social services at risk of deteriorating? and why is the continuing study of first nations peoples central to improving the lives of both indigenous and non-indigenous communities? dn: what always strikes me is the fragility of some of the gains over the last two decades. it is clear that government funding for services and institutional development is important and critical to continued improvement in health, education and economic participation. without stable predictable funding for a set of societal institutions in these three areas it will be difficult to improve. the loss of national aboriginal health organization and the first nations statistical institute will be felt as they represent important sources of knowledge for policy makers in all foray. what many focus upon is only the delivery of services; what is missing is an understanding of the nature of the institutions that are necessary for direct support organizations to function. the issue of racism and its effects has been consistently ignored by researchers and governments as have urban issues (which are now slowly beginning to gain some attention). policy makers have consistently ignored urban aboriginal peoples until recently. research helps us to better understand the issues and to devise, hopefully, better policy and programming interventions. aboriginal leaders complain that their communities have been researched to death and that their interest in more in action than more research. and to some extent this is true. much of the research on aboriginal peoples has been performed by outsiders and directed towards improving the knowledge of outsiders. what is needed is more research that is undertaken on issues identified by aboriginal communities as important to them, undertaken by researchers working with them rather than for someone external and which helps local communities understand their situations better. the likelihood of improved local effort is much improved. 8 smith, teresa. (2012, june 30). canadians think government is too generous with aboriginals: poll. global news. http://www.globalnews.ca/canadians+think+government+is+too+generous+w ith+aboriginals+poll/6442671478/story.html | 223 an interview with pat armstrong canadian health care: privatization and gendered labour priscillia lefebvre is a collaborative ph .d . student at the department of sociology and anthropology/institute of political economy, carleton university (ottawa, canada) . pat armstrong is professor of sociology and women’s studies at york university (toronto, canada) . she held a chsrf/cihr chair in health services and nursing research, focused on gender and chaired the group women and health care reform for more than a decade . she has published on a wide range of issues related to gender, health care and work . pat was interviewed by priscillia lefebvre over august 2011 . priscillia lefebvre (pl): a large focus on your research seems to be the ways in which gender and labour intersect from the vantage point of health care delivery. what have been the main influences that have affected the trajectory of your research in terms of a feminist rooted political economy approach? why is this approach so important in understanding the contradictions that exist regarding the role of women within health care? pat armstrong (pa): it is difficult to identify the main influences on my thinking and research. growing up in a family where community involvement was not only encouraged but required meant seeking engagement at university. also, the red tory approach in our household did not fit so comfortably with the marx i read as a student in the 1960s or with the growing feminist movement i participated in. as juliet mitchell1 explained, marx was not good about women and did not provide a detailed blueprint for analysis, but he did offer a way to make systems transparent and to think about progressive change. in my reading of marx, work and the political economy are where the analysis should start because they are so powerful in shaping our lives; however, both productive and reproductive work have to be understood in historically specific ways and in ways that comprehend contradictions as well as interrelations. indeed, contradictions can provide a basis for creating alternatives. starting with power and economic forces did not imply ignoring ideas, discourses and cultural practices, but it did put those ideas, often blamed for an interview with pat armstrong canadian health care: privatization and gendered labour 224 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times women’s subordination, into a context that allowed us to see the power embedded in them and in their reproduction. furthermore, starting with the political economy did not mean ignoring gender and other basis for inequities. rather, as we are argued in the 1970s and 1980s, gender had to be theorized at the highest level of abstraction if we are to think through the implications for change in our lives. this relates, in turn, to another influence, which was involvement in student and other politics. my feminist political economy approach develops in such practices, as well as through engagement with other academics. canadian studies at carleton university in the early 1970s provided fertile ground for the further development of my ideas about political economy with a clearly canadian twist and so has my continuing policy work. as i became increasingly interested in feminist issues, i abandoned a thesis on the class origins of student activists and focused instead on women’s paid and unpaid work. the result was the double ghetto; canadian women and their segregated work,2 a joint project with my partner hugh armstrong, as is much of my research . when our daughter broke her leg and ended up in the hospital for weeks, we realized that health care covered all aspects of women’s work. paid and unpaid work overlapped in obvious and gendered ways, as the staff told me, but not hugh, where i could get our daughter juice and empty the bed pan. there were unionized and non-union workers, full, part-time and casual jobs, work defined as highly skilled and jobs defined as unskilled, occupations dominated by women classified as managerial, clerical, professional, and service, with many women from racialized and/ or immigrant groups. what it took us longer to realize but what we should have realized as political economists was that health care provides a unique context and required us to learn about a wider range of forces, policies and practices in care. women are not only the majority of workers, but also the majority of patients and of those who take others for care, creating complicated and often contradictory gender relations. equally important from our perspective, health care in canada offers a clear example of how universal programmes can create social solidarity by demonstrating the impact of collective action. what a political economy approach allows us to do is think through the ways work, gender and other inequities intersect, to explore the ways economic and political forces shape not only services and employment, but | 225 also ideas, and to bring together the complexity of work relations within this specific historical context. this approach also helps us see the contradictions in, for example, nurses fighting to distance themselves from links with women’s caring.3 pl: in a previous article published in a 1983 special edition of alternate routes1, you outline the problematic nature of quantitative data analysis as gender-blind. since then, you have been involved in several working groups, including the national coordinating group on health care reform and women (now women and health care reform), dedicated to researching health care reform policies and their impact on women both as health care providers and recipients. in your experience, what have been the greatest research challenges in gathering information on gender and sex differences within health care in canada? in your opinion, what needs to be explored further? pa: in my view, many of the challenges remain the same. there are still problems with the way data are collected and categorized, with the failure to collect some kinds of data and a further problem with the way the data are analyzed and with what gets accepted as good science. in too many cases, quantitative data are still seen as providing the truth and the whole truth, while qualitative data are too often treated as suspect. especially in health care, there is a hierarchy of evidence in terms of what kinds of data are accepted as legitimate and worthy of attention with the meta-analysis of double-blind randomized clinical trials taken as the gold standard because they are assumed to remove all bias. yet numbers, and categories, continue to reflect values. one example from our recent research is the definition of industry.4 in the past, statistics canada defined industry as ‘where people work.’ thus, everyone who worked in hospital would be counted as working in the health care industry. now industry is defined as ‘who you work for,’ removing from health care all those whose jobs have been contracted out, most of whom are women and many of whom are from racialized groups. a second example comes from data on work-related violence.5 our interviews with women employed in long-term residential care indicate that many women fail to report violence, in part because they will be blamed, in part because they won’t be believed, and in part because it takes too much time. the result is underestimates of violence in the numbers. 1  beyond numbers: problems with quantitative data, by pat armstrong and hugh armstrong in alternate routes: a critical review, vol. 6. ottawa, ontario: carleton university, 1983. pages: 1-40. an interview with pat armstrong canadian health care: privatization and gendered labour 226 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times at the same time, research is still published that failed to collect data by sex, and even more frequently, without analyzing the data by sex or gender. most frequently, the approach to data collection and analysis makes it impossible to do a gender analysis. women and health care reform has illustrated the problem by looking at wait times for hip and knee surgery, demonstrating that we need to look at the entire patient journey to see the ways gender influences how long women wait and even whether or not women get the surgery they need.6 a mere comparison of the number of women who get surgery compared to the number of men tells us little about equity. as women and health care reform struggled to figure out how to ensure gender could be included as a criterion in meta-analysis such as cochrane reviews, we came to realize that in their attempt to ensure scientific validity such reviews sought to eliminate context. as a result, they eliminated gender and racialization because both are about social relations in context. in addition, new problems have arisen since we wrote that article. at the time statistics canada data were free and now much of it must be paid for. in the past, we could analyze the data in the way we saw fit. now for access to much of the original data, you apply for access and then you have to go through a data analysis centre where the analysis must be vetted. of course, the government has attacked the long-form census in general and a critical question for feminist in particular, the one that asked about unpaid work. does gender have an impact, and in what ways, needs to always be part of the question, whatever the research, but this lesson has still not been learned by far too many researchers and policy makers. so, what needs to be explored further is a huge question. in short, we have some more data by sex, but too little analysis by gender and too much faith in numbers. pl: much of your work focuses on the privatization of health care and its detrimental effects in terms of access to treatment and quality of care. in exposing privatization2 (p. 163), you outline the introduction of privatization measures to health care beginning with the majority conservative government in ontario in the mid-90s. given the current tory majority at the federal level and provincial inroads to privatization in ontario, do you see this as a particularly critical time in defending health care as a public good, rather than a competitive market com2 bernier, kay wilson, karen r. grant, and ann pederson. toronto, ontario: university of toronto press, 2001. $24.76 cdn, paper. isbn-13: 978-1551930374. pages: 1-310. | 227 modity? what are your thoughts regarding stephen harper’s recent statement that, although the federal conservatives have no plans to go private, he cannot control the kinds of alternative delivery models used at the provincial level? pa: the best defence of public health care is popular support and we need to mobilize that support more than ever because we are facing a huge threat. the biggest threat now, in my view, is not costs but further privatization in all its forms. those pushing for privatization know that medicare is canada’s best loved social programme and so have privatized by stealth, always promising public payment. they have claimed there is a crisis and that health care cannot be sustained; that it must be radically transformed in order to save it. fear is a powerful force, especially when your health is at stake. our biggest problem in defending public care is complexity and the difficulty of getting people to understand why it is wrong to have forprofit delivery, even if the money comes from the public purse rather than from private payment, and why health care is as sustainable as we want it to be. i think the federal government will be very crafty while promoting deep privatization. it will negotiate individually with provinces and territories, allowing them to go their own way and blame the consequences on them. of course, the prime minister can stop that. monique begin did when she was minister of health and welfare. but prime minister harper will not intervene, so we need to put pressure at the local level and keep educating people about the perils of profits in care. if we do not stop this erosion soon, it will be too late. pl: in your opinion, how harmful are agreements such as the canadaeuropean union comprehensive economic and trade agreement (eu-ceta) to canadian health care and how are women affected in particular? pa: in many ways, these new agreements have much the same impact as earlier ones and have particularly negative consequences for women as a group and for particular groups of women.7 the agreements are written to promote profit and limit governments’ capacity to shape their own economies and public policies. it is much harder to influence policies if governments are prohibited from acting in the public’s interests and are instead forced to act in the interests of global profits. because more women than men depend on the state for services, financial support, jobs and protections against things like violence at work, agreements that limit or prevent governments from an interview with pat armstrong canadian health care: privatization and gendered labour 228 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times regulating, protecting, and providing have a particularly negative impact on them. the result is likely to be greater inequities among women, as well as greater inequity between women and men. pl: labour disputes, in particular organized labour, have received much political attention recently. for example, in an unprecedented move, postal workers were recently legislated back to work on a lockout. do you consider the recent use of back to work legislation in both the private and public sectors as threatening to the collective bargaining rights of unions? also, how do you think these latest negotiations will affect the collective organization and labour struggles of health service workers (for example, nurses and home care workers)? pa: the attacks on labour are no surprise and it should be clear that attacks on unions in the public sector are attacks on women who make up the majority of unionized workers there. one factor that kept families going during the most recent economic crisis was women’s employment in the public sector in general.8 we are building up to massive cuts in the health sector, where four out of five workers are women and where one in five women works. those who keep their jobs are likely to see them get worse as privatization is pushed further. cutbacks in public pensions and benefits will also hurt these women, as well as their families. at the same time however, women employed in health care enjoy tremendous public support. if the unions in the public sector can come together and resist, we may see real limits on attacks from the government. few doubt these women work hard, few think they are overpaid or pandered to by their employers, so it is much harder to sell the line about being pampered employees or to promote the politics of envy with them, as has been done with other unionized workers. pl: finally, in critical to care3 (p. 53), you argue that much of the labour performed by women in health services is essential in terms of providing care, yet remains peripheral in terms of social and economic status. your research indicates that due to this gendered division of labour in health care women are the primary health care providers in canada, yet women hold very little decision making power when it comes to policy. also, not only is it highly gendered, it is highly racialized. in your opinion, to what extent has the introduction of state level initiatives, such as the foreign live-in caregiver program, 3  critical to care: the invisible women in health services, by pat armstrong, hugh armstrong, and krista scott-dixon. toronto, ontario: university of toronto press, 2008. $20.76 cdn, paper. isbn-13: 978-0802096081. pages: 1-176. | 229 perpetuated these inequities? also, even if such initiatives did not exist, how far do you think ‘within system’ efforts, such as changes to policy, will go in resolving these inequities? is a shift beyond the present political system also needed? pa: these are complicated questions and difficult to answer in part because i think there are contradictory policies and practices. universal health care has undoubtedly helped women, both as care providers and as those with care needs. women’s employment conditions are better in the public sector and they have more power there, in large measure because unions have been strong, but also because there are pressures within and outside government to respond to calls for human rights and to set an example as a model employer.9 initiatives such as pay and employment equity have helped make employment in the public sector more equitable than in the private sector. of course, these gains are precisely why there is pressure on governments to abandon these policies and to attack unions; attacks supported by many within governments. this is not to claim that health care has been equally accessible or that employment practices in the public sector have resulted in equity but we can demonstrate that women do better in the public sector than they do in the for-profit one. at the same time, the way health care has been organized and policies developed have in many ways reinforced not only women’s responsibilities for care, but also the inequities among women. this is happening increasingly with current reforms. nor is it to argue that we should try to return to some ‘good old days.’ those days were not all good and, in any case, they are gone. we are dealing with a new reality and ‘old’ means of undermining the gains we made. nevertheless, i think that we should struggle for government policies that promote equity. universal public daycare combined with more public homecare, for example, could help make the foreign live-in caregiver programme irrelevant. if workers in these services were unionized and supported by strong anti-racist programmes, it would help address some inequities. however, it is not sufficient, in my view, to rely on governments alone. we need strategies that address conditions of work and care within the voluntary and for-profit sectors as well, even while we work for public care. we also need strategies to change the power inequities within households. i agree, then, with the implications of your question that we need to shift beyond the system and that we need to connect multiple policies in and outside the state, but i think that it is still important to work to change public policies. an interview with pat armstrong canadian health care: privatization and gendered labour 230 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times notes 1 women’s estate by juliet mitchell. harmondsworth: penguin, 1971 and “marxism and women’s liberation” by juliet mitchell. social praxis 1(1):23-33. 2 the double ghetto: canadian women and their segregated work by pat armstrong and hugh armstrong. toronto: mcclelland and stewart, 1978. 3 “contradictions at work: struggles for control in canadian health care” by pat armstrong and hugh armstrong in morbid symptoms health under capitalism, edited by leo panitch and colin leys. 2009. pontypool: merlin press, pages 145-183 4 “doubtful data: why paradigms matter in counting the health-care labor force” by pat armstrong, hugh armstrong and kate laxer in. work in tumultuous times: critical perspectives , edited byvivian shalla and wallace clement. montreal and kingston: mcgill-queen’s university press, 2007 “precarious work, privatization, and the health care industry: the case of ancillary workers” . pat armstrong and kate laxer in precarious employment . understanding labour market insecurity in canada edited by leah vosko. montreal: mcgillqueen’s university press, 2006. 5 critical to care: the invisible women in health services, by pat armstrong, hugh armstrong, and krista scott-dixon. toronto, ontario: university of toronto press, 2008. $20.76 cdn, paper. isbn-13: 978-0802096081. pages: 1-176. 6 “waiting to wait: improving wait times evidence through gender-based analysis by beth jackson, ann pederson and madeline boscoe in women’s health . intersections of policy, research, and practice. edited by pat arsmtrong and jennifer deadman. toronto: women’s press, 2009. pages 35-52. 7 “trade agreements, home care and women’s health.” by olena hankivsky, marina morrow, pat armstrong, lindsay, galvin and holly grinvalds. ottawa: status of women in canada, 2004. 8 “women forced to work longer, harder, for less pay by pat armstrong in speaking truth to power edited by trish hennessey and ed finn. ottawa: ccpa, 2010. pages 7-14. 9 precarious work, privatization, and the health care industry: the case of ancillary workers” . pat armstrong and kate laxer in precarious employment . understanding labour market insecurity in canada edited by leah vosko. montreal: mcgill-queen’s university press, 2006. 142 implications of the domestic role of women eileen saunders the feminist movement has posed a fundemental challenge to social scientists, a challenge reflected in the necessity of providing an analysis of the causes of the oppression of women. the response has been varied, with available models ranging from a focus on biological explanations to class analysis. i would argue, however, that we have not yet reached the point where we are able to integrate these various positions into an adequate analysis of the forms of oppression women have experienced and continue to experience, the sources of their oppression, the mechanisms by which it is maintained, and the means to eliminate it. the resolution of this "impasse" requires that we begin to fully examine the spheres of female activity and attempt to integrate our understanding of the social forces which shape female participation in society. as juliet mitchell has shown in her criticisms of socialist movements, we have failed to look at woman's role through the structures that compose it i production, reproduction, sexuality and socialization (mitchell, 1966). the value of her analysis i3 its ability to examine the position of wom«n historically in terms of their variable role within each structure. the difficulty, on the other hand, emerges in treating these categories as independent structures which are unrelated in origin. for this reason, r. bridenthal has argued that it is possible to fuse mitchell's latter three 143 structures into one, each representing an aspect of the reproduction of the species (bridenthal, 1976:3-5). one is then able to examine the situation of women through an analysis of their position in the productive sphere (as workers) and the reproductive sphere (as housewives and mothers). through an historical examination, one can discover the nature of the relationship between these spheres, and the implications this holds for the societal position of women. a beginning point in such an attempt is an examination of the structure of the reproductive sphere and the position it occupies under capitalist relations. using a marxist framework, w. seccombe has questioned toe role of household labour (i.e., reproductive) in the creation of value, and examines its linkages to the overall wage-relation system (seccombe, 1973). seccombe* s thesis is that sexual oppression emerged, with the advance of capitalism, due to the sexual division of labour: a division into an "industrial unit" and a "domestic unit" (1973»6). moreover, this development required the physical seperation of this workplace and the home (i will return to a discussion of this "division" in my discussion of the transition from a precapitalist mode to a capitalist mode of production). seccombe argues that the labour of the domestic unit has a dual nature. on the one hand, domestic labour is necessary labour because the commodities of capital require 1w additional labour (i.e., housework) before consumption. in the preparation of food for family consumption, the housewife's labour creates a use-value insofar as the product of her labour directly serves certain consumption needs. such labour also allows for the reproduction of the wage earner's labourpower (i.e., capacity for work, 1973»l /0« domestic labour thus creates value because "all labour produees value when it produces any part of a commodity that achieves equivalence in the market place with other commodities" (seccombe, 1973'9)domestic labour helps produce and reproduce labour power as a commodity. on the other hand, and here is where we begin to approach the dual nature of domestic labour, the marxist "law of value" cannot apply to labour in the reproductive sphere. there are two reasons for thisi first, domestic labour is not engaged in an exchange relation with capital, and second, it is unproductive because it produces no surplus value . in other words, because domestic labour has only a use-value, it has no direct relation to capital. it then becomes difficult to measure the value of such labour. for other commodities, this is unproblematic. for example, labour power as a commodity achieves its equivalence through the wage relation. but, since domestic labour is not exchanged on a market, it has no apparent exchange value . seccombe 's solution is to argue that the value of domestic labour is equivalent to that part of the worker's wage that goes to the maintenance of 1*5 domestic labour (1973«8-10). its value, in this sense is mediated by the wage transaction between capital and the wage earner. it is also for this reason that seccombe argues that one cannot speak of surplus value creation in reference to domestic labour. because the value of this labour is seen as equivalent to its maintenance costs, the possibility of an extraction of a surplus value from household labour by capital is rendered impossible under seccombe* s scheme. the housewife is assumed to receive the value she creates. he recognizes that a "mystification" of the wage relation occurs under capitalism. whereas wages are equivalent to the value of labour power, not the value produced by labour power, this is not the case with the relation between capital and 'the housewife. the value she produces is contained in the wage received by the wage earner. seccombe* s analysis is valuable in several respects. it represents needed insight into an area which marxists have tended to ignore in theoretical endeavors. moreover, his analysis of the mediation of the relation between capital and domestic labour by the wage transaction contains important implications regarding the "political potential" of housewives (1973 ! 21-23) . the problem however is that he does not really develop his argument tothe necessary point. it is useful to explicate the structure of domestic labour under capitalism, but this in itself is not sufficient. one must question the motivation behind the continuing reproduction ik6 of that structure in its present form. in other words, does domestic labour, in its privatized and unwaged form, serve a value to capital in addition to the simple use value it creates? i am really seeking to question the conception of household labour as non-productive, in the sense of creating no surplus value. a strict marxist application of the term surplus value blinds us to the value extracted by capital from domestic labour. the structure of the domestic sphere allows for the reproduction of class relations in various forms. these must be explicated before one can attempt to account for the reproduction of sexism in contemporary society. what i am suggesting is a reconceptualization of our understanding of surplus value creation so that we are not forced to deal only with those exchange transactions which occur on an open market. if one can demonstrate a value served by domestic labour in the direct reproduction of class relations, and the extraction of that value by capital, then it becomes possible to discuss the productivity of domestic labour. i will now discuss the role of domestic labour in the satisfaction of certain of capital's needs. first, capitalism cannot satisfy all a worker's needs through commodity production. these needs must however be met in order to maintain a passive working force. domestic labour becomes the forum for the satisfaction of these needs in that it has personal value which cannot be reproduced by socialized domestic labour. 147 the family and the role of the housewife provide an area where the male worker can achieve some sense of authority and control (which is otherwise lacking in his relation to capital). secondly, domestic labour realizes a higher standard of living for the worker than is realized in his actual wages. workers are paid a wage to cover the cost of maintaining their labour power. domestic labour is the activity which transforms that wage into usable goods. obviously, there are alternative methods of maintaining labour power: restaurants, laundries, tailors, etc. but it is cheaper for capital to maintain domestic labour than to give workers higher wages so that they can buy these services on a competitive market. the wage labour system is sustained by the socially necessary, but private, labour of housewives and mothers. child rearing, cleaning, laundry, maintenance of property, food preparation, reproduction, etc. are all necessary elements in the maintenance of life and the reproduction of the work force. in this sense, they are all aspects of the mode of reproduction. this sphere produces daily and generationally the labour needed by capital. fianlly, by maintaining an economically dependent, and therefore passive, individual within the family the industrial sector creates an individual who is easier to manipulate. historieally this has been the casei women have functioned as a cheap and passive reserve work force. this is reflected in their unequal wages, narrow choice of occupations, and ikb underrepresentation in trade unions. it is a situation which has been relativiely easy to maintain. she has no structural responsibility in the waged labour force. rather, her participation is seen as transitory, depending on the labour needs of the industrialized sector. reserve labour power is stored in the family, drawn upon when necessary, and then reabsorded when no longer needed. the position of women as unwaged privatized labourers in the family is reproduced outside of the family. they have traditionally been located in low wage positions in more or less marginal occupations. however, one must be careful not to view female wage labour as only transitory in nature. this is a problem in seccombe's analysis, as well as in that of other marxists who only deal with the housewife and ignore women as workers. the error is compounded when marxists attempt to find a ba;is for the unity between the working class and housewives. to see only her domestic labour or her position as wage earner as the source of unity is to ignore that women are often both domestic labourers and wage earners. the central feature of women under capitalism is not their position as domestic labourers, but rather their dual role . the task is to relate these two roles in a coherent fashion -something which marxists have not yet done. when marxist feminists deal with the issue of wage labour, they assume that their interests are synonymous with working class interests. this is not the case however, due to the contradictory nature of wage labour and 1^9 domestic labour, a contradiction contained in the female role. female wage labour is not synonymous with male wage labourj the former's economic position as domestic labourers has transformed their economic position as wage labourers. their increased proletarianization has not eliminated the gap between female and male workers. it is a question again of the specific oppression of women: this is an issue which is not dealt with by merely recognizing that women serve two roles. the key is to see the integration of these two roles, and the contradiction that integration poses for women. female labour is both privatized and socialised: she is both a domestic and an industrial unit. her status as worker reduces her isolation, but has done nothing to reduce the oppression of her privatized labour at home. her domination within the family is controlled by the male worker. granted, it was originally based on his relation to the means of production, but it has been maintained, even with the entry of women into industry. the solution is to look for the interplay of this dual role of women, a situation which has given rise to a tension between the productive sphere and the reproductive sphere. women are positioned historically in the center of this dialectic, and with advanced capitalism the opposing forces of production and reproduction have posed contradictions for women which demand a resolution. if one can isolate these 150 contradictions, then perhaps one can build a base for a successful feminist movement. the women's work study group (1976) has argued that these contradictions do in fact reflect "stress points" in the capitalist system. one needs to examine the historical emergence of these contradictions and the changing nature of the productive and reproductive spheres. i will ' briefly discuss three historical phases and the impact the changing roles of production and reproduction has had on the position of women. the historical phases are the stages of precapitalism, industrialization, and monopoly capitalism. in precapitalist societies, the family was the major productive unit in the economy. the female performed tha tasks of the rpproductive sphere (reproduction, health care, laundry, and so on), as well as the tasks associated with the material production of necessities. production was generally for immediate consumption, but also involved the market exchange of goods. there was a sexual division of labor at work, both categories of sexually divided tasks being regarded as valuable and socially necessary. moreover, both forms of labour were performed within the family unit. in fact, one could say that the productive and reproductive spheres maintained a symbiotic relationship, in that each sphere was dependent to a great extent on the labour which occured within the other sphere (bridenthal, 1976:5). it is only with capitalism that material production, organized socially in the form of wage labour, 151 became seperated from the reproductive tasks within the family. with this seperation of production and reproduction, the family relinquished its economic functions, and the household was devalued in terms of its socio-economic contribution. it was devalued precisely because it became isolated from the socialized production of surplus value. in the nineteenth century, with the rise of industry, commodity production shifted increasingly to the factory system. the shift fundementally altered the position of women. it shifted the nature of demand from skilled workers to low wage unskilled workers who could perform the tasks of running the machines. since physical strength was no longer as important a variable for this task, women were increasingly brought in as a cheap and readily available source of unskilled labour. however, the increased entry of women posed a serious threat to the bargainning position of the skilled male worker. it waa during this period that the ideology of the family unit was transformed. the focus shifted from its value as a productive unit to its value as an institution for securing personal happiness and fulfillment (zaretsky, 1976:^7-57). females were regarded as the key figures in that unit, thereby reinforcing motherhood as the feminine ideal. at the same time, the ideology defined the labour undertaken by women in this sphere as economically unproductive. such an ideology served two purposes. first, by upholding motherhood and the household as the "natural" and "true" position of women, the male worker 152 was able to restrict the entry of a large number of women into the labour market. at the same time, capital's needs were met. for those women who could not afford the "luxury" of remaining in the home, their ideological position as unproductive domestic labourers left them in a weak bargaining position upon entry into socialized production. capitalists were then able to maintain a cheap supply of labour, which could be easily laid off during economic recessions. women workers are the first to go when jobs are scarce. part of this is due to the ideology that a male worker has a family to support, whereas a female probably has a husband to support her. the sexist ideology of this period crossed classboundaries as well. whereas the vote was extended to all white men, regardless of social position, in the mid 1800's in north america, women , regardless of their economic standing, were refused the franchise (women's work study group, 1976:31). the increasing socialization of production, and its seperation from the more privatized reproductive sphere posed visible contradictions for women in this period. female workers were doubly exploited, both as domestic and as wage labourers, while bourgeois women were increasingly isolated in their separate sphere. the result was an upsurge of feminist protest. as zaretsky notes, the protest took two forms. first, the bourgeois women organized a protest against the enforced idleness of their domestic lives, and demanded access to middle class occupations. protest from working class women was focused 153 on a call for reforms in the industrial sphere so as to lessen the hardships of their working position (zaretsky, 1973s 37). unfortunately, both movements placed their hopes solely on the granting of the franchise; they assumed that contradictions could be resolved through legal means. as they quickly came to realize, this was not the case. the oppression of women was too integrally connected to the specific mode of production. the monopoly phase of capitalism which began to emerge in the early twentieth century is characterized by several developments: an increasing concentration of capital, a shift away from labour intensive industry, and a rise in profit rates which is accompanied by a need to maintain high consumption rates. it is a period marked by a rise in wages, which is controlled for by capitalists by a corresponding rise in commodity prices (see braverman, 197*0. furthermore, monopoly capitalists reorganized corporate facilities to spread the ideology of consumerism, and thereby ensure a market for their commodities. the family unit took on a new value for capital as a market for products. with increasingly sophisticated forces of production and ideological manipulation at their control, capitalists were able to cultivate that family market through an ideology of mass consumption. a cheap yet educated work force was required to perform the task of marketing the increasing mass of commodities. the result was a rapidly expanding white collar sector for which women provided an ideal source of labour. however, the rising expectations imposed by mass 15* consumerism often could not be met by a single wage earner in the family unit. to facilitate the entry of married women into the work force, the technology of capitalism produced new labour saving devices (automatic washers, dryers, freezers, tv dinners, and so on) which decreased the time spent on household tasks. these devices undoubtedly have had an impact on domestic labour; at the same time there has been a qualitative expansion of woman's work. due to the increased emphasis on consumption and standard of living, women have had more tasks to perform. her responsibilities in the reproductive sphere were not reduced: if anything, they were redefined in order to widen their scope. women now have to be child psychologists, aware consumers, and "efficient" housekeepers. what has occurred with monopoly capitalism is the development of a larger group of women who are engaged in labour in both the productive and reproductive spheres. women have entered the productive sphere largely in work tasks which are part of the reproductive sphere (i.e., teaching, nursing, social work, domestic service sectors). bridenthal argues quite convincingly that this phenomenon is indicative of an increasing shift of the mode of reproduction from the personal to the public forum (1976«6-8). while the labour within the family remains privatized, decisions and policy concerning the form and use of that labour are no longer in the woman's control. bridenthal 's discussion focuses on the increasing intervention of the capitalist system 155 into the reproductive sphere in order to ensure the control of the reproduction of the labour force. the increased entry of the female into socialized production transformed the area of reproductive labour. this in turn threatens the maintenance of the specific mode of production unless the former is controlled by capital. in other words, capital must on the one hand maintain the stability of the nuclear family (to ensure the personal happiness of the worker and obscure his alienation on the job), and on the other hand, it requires women as an available source of reserve labour. the structural contradiction of these needs has left women in advanced capitalism both socialized and privatized in their labour; both waged and unwaged. the contradictory nature of capitalist ideology becomes only too evident. the family unit is portrayed as a separate entity from the economic sphere. but in fact, the household as a productive and consumptive unit is integrally tied to certain economic needs of the system. the myth of the family as independent of the productive sphere is necessary if society is to maintain the notion that the personal life of the worker has an entirely self controlled meaning. because the family is organized around reproduction and consumption however, it is impossible to speak of family organization without considering the labour needs of capital. as already noted, monopoly capital relies on high rates of consumption and high commodity prices. these needs, in turn, force women into the work force 156 on an increasingly permanent basis in order to maintain the standard of living demanded by mass consumerism. this poses a challenge to the traditional position of the male as the wage earner, and to the authority that position has given him over the female. the result is an erosion of the traditional ideology of the family unit, though the demand by capital for such a unit remains. this is not to say that capital has reorganized its sexist ideology. on the contrary, it is reproduced as long as women receive lower wages and are concentrated in low-skilled occupations. however the transformation in the reproductive sphere (it is becoming less and less the primary position for women as greater numbers join the work force) makes visible the need for a transformation in the productive sphere. women are now both regular participants in the wage labour force and in the domestic labour force, yet still the ideology defines them in terms of housewives and mothers. the tension and contradiction inherent in their dual role is masked by a false separation of the two spheres. capital has mystified the place of women within capitalist production. it thus becomes the task of a revolutionary movement to "demystify" their position, and organize on the basis of an understanding of both spheres of female labour. 157 references braverman, harry 197^ labor and monopoly capital. new york: monthly review press. bridenthal, renate 1976 "the dialectics of reproduction and production in history." radical america 10 ( march-april ) . mitchell, juliet 1966 "women: the longest revolution." new left review uo(november-december) . seccombe, wallace 1973 "the housev/ife and her labour under capitalism. new left review 83( january-february) . women's work study group 1976 "loom, broom and womb: producers, maintainers and reproducers." radical america 10(marchapril) . zaretsky, eli 1973 "capitalism, the family and personal life." socialist revolution, 1 3lk{ january-april) , and 1 5 ( may-june ) . the myth of autonomy in family farm production bonnie ward agricultural practice on family farms throughout ontario history provides an example of independent commodity production. according to this description, farm producers own, operate and control the means of production (hedley, 1976:415; johnson, 1979:91). the autonomy of farm producers is derived from their ability to determine the conditions of production, for example, the type and quantity of commodity produced and application of technological innovation. the capacity of producers to influence the conditions of the sale and purchase of agricultural goods significantly influences the degree of productive autonomy characteristic of farming. in a capitalist society where private ownership prevails, and the autonomy of owners is seen as providing scope for the expansion of production and innovation, the real relation between ownership and autonomy mi_st be made explicit. it will be argued that the real relationship between ownership and autonomy in farm practice is an historical relationship which is determined and conditioned by: 1. the transformation of the mode of production in society, 2. the transformation of the relations of production immediate to farming, 3. the role of the state in these transformations. through the examination of these historical processes it appears that the autonomy of small farm producers at present is a myth. farm production seems to be increasingly characterized not by autonomy but by dependency; dependency among members of farm families and of small farmers on the state. the transformation of the mode of production may be more precisely described as the process by which a particular mode of production emerges as dominant in a society. in ontario history, the most significant transformation in this regard is the emergence of the * revised version of a paper presented to the canadian sociology and anthropology association, saskatoon, june, 1979. capitalist mode of production. the rise of capitalism has two effects: capitalist relations may replace previously existing relations of production, or previously existing relations of production may be retained but in a new relation to the capitalist market. in ontario farm history both effects can be observed. at present, in ontario, there is evidence that the production of agricultural commodities is increasingly organized by capitalist relations (warnock:123; johnson, 1979:94). the replacement of the family farm by corporate (capitalist) farming occurs after the incorporation of family farm production into the capitalist market. in fact, it is incorporation of the family farm into capitalist market relations which results in the eventual elimination of increasing numbers of small farms. the process by which family farm production is transformed by the emergence of capitalism is the context for the analysis of the relation between ownership and autonomy. h. saffioti, describing the emergence to dominance of the capitalist mode of production, states: a mode of production is dominant insofar as it interferes vertically in other modes of production thus provoking the latter's loss of autonomy and redefining their specific activities . . . hence they are only able to survive thanks to a process of redefinition governed by the capitalist mode of production ... what remains are precapitalist work relations which now have new connotations. (1977:30) vertical interference by the capitalist mode of production describes the process which has transformed independent commodity production in agriculture. the family farm persists but under conditions substantially altered by the capitalist market. competitive conditions for marketing agricultural produce confront the farmer as pressure for specialization, with consequent risks of overproduction, and loss in real income in addition to the natural/biological risks of agricultural production 50 (smith, 1978:19-23; mitchell, .1975:18-21; hedley, 1976:417). what is clearly suggested by the vertical interference of capitalism is the possibility of retaining individual ownership while experiencing significant alteration in other conditions of production. the alteration of market conditions and pressure for specialization with its concomitant risks, result in risk minimizing practices which may in themselves limit productivity (hedley, 1976:418). the double bind that emerges with transformed productive conditions limits the autonomy of the farmer in terms of the type and quantity of goods produced, the scale of operation and the necessity of adopting technological innovations in order to remain competitive. vertical interference of the capitalist mode of production limits autonomy further in the sphere of ownership of the means of production. the necessity of greater investment in land and machinery in order to maintain competitive levels of production leads to ever increasing dependence on credit and corporate controlled production and marketing of farm machinery, fertilizer and fuel. that is, there emerges a dependence of the farmer on capitalist relations for the necessities of productive consumption. the increasing determination by capitalist market relations of not only the type and quantity of product but also the costs of production continually narrows the sphere of autonomy of agricultural producers. is the integration of independent commodity production in agriculture into capitalist market relations simply a precursor to the eventual demise of all "family farm" production? evidence of the increasing corporatization of agriculture and the decrease in small farms have led some to conclude that this is the case (johnson, 1979:98). there are, however, factors and conditions which mediate the tendency to corporatization and the erosion of small farm production. 51 it appears that certain types of agricultural production (e.g. fruit, tobacco) are particularly amenable to organization on capitalist lines, whereas other sectors retain more traditional forms of productive organization. region also appears to be a mediating factor in the corporatization process. the comparison of the rate of corporatization of agriculture in ontario and quebec reveals that quebec agricultural practice may be more resistant to change (johnson, 1979:98). protective legislation and tax concessions which benefit individual farmers may be understood as legitimating activities of the state which affect the corporatization process. to the extent that tradition, region and ideology may influence the rate of corporatization of agriculture, their relationship to the transformation of the mode of production needs clarification. saffioti, in her analysis of the process of vertical interference with precapitalist forms of productive organization by the capitalist mode of production, postulates that this process has the effect of retaining only the economic aspect of precapitalist work, relations and eliminating their ideological aspect, which it replaces with bourgeois ideology (saf fioti :30) . such a hypothesized replacement of one ideology with another does not appear to adequately reflect the way in which world views change. while it seems likely that new productive relations generate new ideological counterparts, some aspects of traditional world views persist and continue to be reproduced. if ideas are viewed as singularly determined by productive relations, then the transformation of productive relations ought to lead directly to the transformation of ideas. however, this appears not necessarily to be the case. in the preceding discussion it was suggested that the conditions of farming have been significantly transformed such that the margin of autonomy of the small producer is increasingly reduced. in spite of the altered 52 conditions of production, autonomy persists ideologically as the counterpart of private ownership. belief in the autonomy of individual owners may persist as a result of the reluctance of individuals to alter their beliefs in accordance with changes in the world. alternately, this belief may be reproduced ideologically and serve to justify practices related to capitalist expansion. (owners of capitalist enterprises may have considerable autonomy) . ideological reproduction of the relation of ownership to autonomy in the context of capitalist development mystifies the real effects of that development for small agricultural producers. the latter explanation can be examined by reference to the degree of autonomy which existed in family farming historically. the myth of autonomy in agricultural production has its historical origins in the notion of the self sufficient agriculture of pioneer families. v. fowke has argued that self sufficiency is itself a myth "which is an integral part of canadian folklore" (fowke, 1962:23). far from self sufficiency, pioneer agriculture was characterized by the need for capital as a precondition for settlement, barter and the extension of credit as a means to provide for domestic and productive consumption, and the need for markets for surplus products (fowke, 1962). settlement of the canadian frontier was not the culmination of the pioneering dream of daring individuals. it was rather, a means to escape industrial labour, famine and political revolution (loyalists) and for some, the chance to acquire greater wealth and position. ontario pioneer settlements were not located by chance but were a product of british interest in providing defense for trade routes and for the provisioning of military personnel and traders (fowke, 1946:118). from the outset, it became apparent that settlement provided an excellent investment opportunity, not through agricultural production but in the movement of settlers. "there were profitable investment opportunities 53 associated with the original transfer and installation of prospective farm populations" (fowke, 1946:118). this relation is further evidenced by the responsibility of the bureau of agriculture established in 1852, for immigration policy (fowke, 1946:121). the combination of the dependence of farmers on market conditions (capital, barter, credit) and on the state for acquiring land is evidence of the interconnectedness of agricultural production with political and economic interests from its inception. while this interconnectedness does not necessarily imply a lack of autonomy, it does create a basis from which historical relations of dependence may be seen to emerge. v. fowke, in identifying the historical pattern in canadian agricultural policy states: the clearest and most significant uniformity regarding canadian agriculture for more than three hundred years has been its deliberate and consistent use as a basis for economic and political empire. (1978:3) while economic and political interests are significant in the determination of agricultural settlement, it would appear that at least for a time, a period of relative autonomy of agricultural producers could be said to have existed. this is in part due to periods of favourable market conditions and minimally due to the protective actions of the state (jones: 196, 307). in addition, it could be argued that productive relations organized on the basi6 of collective labours of family members contributed to the possibility of a relative degree of autonomy in agricultural production. the family constitutes a basis for production from which a considerable number of benefits can be derived. the division of labour among family members facilitated the diversification of production which contributed both to domestic consumption and to the production of commodities. the work of women, often associated with production closer 54 to the home, could be drawn upon at times when additional labour was required in the fields. the contribution of children to agricultural production beginning at an early age provided additional necessary labour (johnson, 1974:17). when inadequate resources were available for establishing a farm, family members worked for wages before or during the early years of settlement (fowke, 1962:32-33). the intense labour required and the need for financial resources in agriculture prior to 1850 necessitated a co-operative productive unit like the family for survival (johnson, 1974:15-22). however, these conditions would change. the introduction of mass education and use of technology in agricultural production were significant in the change in participation of family members (johnson, 1974:23). with increasing specialization and transformation of productive relations, women (and children) became increasingly separated from the production of commodities. this separation was enhanced ideologically by the emergent role of 'chatelaine 1 , the wife of the 'better class' of entrepreneur. the agricultural practice of the wealthiest settlers was thus set up as the model for all agricultural practice. this point is illustrated by the tendency for the wealthiest settlers to be the organizers of agricultural societies and the initiators of technological innovation (jones :157, 174). similarly, the separation of the "chatelaine" from the production of commodities may have exerted ideological pre-eminence over relations of interdependence of family members which characterized most farming. at this point i would like to note that i am somewhat skeptical about historical accounts of the time and degree of separation of women from agricultural commodity production. it is unclear whether the productive relations described are those of the majority of farmers or of "ideal" (affluent) farmers. for the moment, this question must be 55 suspended pending further investigation. what is clear however, is that while there may be evidence of the decreasing role of women in commodity production (hedley, 1977:6; johnson, 1974:24) the work of women in creating conditions for continued commodity production is significant. women have often taken on tasks of bookkeeping and business management (kohl, 1978:52). women's role in reproduction and domestic work also provides the basis for long and short run production of labour power required by the enterprise. further, the efforts of the family, particularly of women, toward decreasing consumption of commodities and the production of use value offers a measure of protection in "lean" times. more relevant in recent times would be the contribution by family members of wages. as input of capital comes to have ever increasing importance, family members more frequently have off-farm employment. it may be argued that the shift from interdependence of family members in agricultural labour to dependence on family members for wage inputs is a qualitative change. analysis of the significance of wage inputs to the persistence of many family farm operations in ontario warrants further investigation and evidence. in all of the above ways, the productive interdependence of family members has contributed greatly to creating conditions of flexibility in an enterprise vulnerable to "acts of god", of the market and of the state. this flexibility could be said to account for the relative degree of autonomy differentially experienced by farm producers historically. as is implicit in the foregoing discussion, the capacity of internal relations of family farm production to offer protection from transformed market conditions is limited. m. hedley states, "the significance of the involvement of domestic producers in commodity production is that reproduction of the mode of production is unavoidably 56 dependent on the process of exchange" (hedley, 1977: a). this dependency is at present mediated by the state through agricultural policy, trade policy, supervision of marketing boards, and tax, succession and zoning laws, to name a few examples. fowkes' thesis of the dependence of farm producers on dominant economic and political interests, extended into the present, suggests there is little basis for believing that small producers will, in the long run, be offered any measure of protection. this skepticism is well founded, as an examination of the report of the task force on agriculture, (1967) reveals. the recommendations of this report include : 1. reduction of the number of farms with about 2/3 of farm families removed. 2. increase in farm size. 3# greater rationalization of farming with an increase in "backward, forward, horizontal integration" with agricultural business interests. 4. "a clearcut separation of welfare and commercial farm policy". (summarized from warnock, 1971:126) my emphasis the government disowned this report without providing a substitute policy (cayley, 19.73:8). however, a detailed analysis of the historical conditions which give rise to recommendations of this sort is required. points like the emergence of an overlap in "welfare and commercial policy" obviously need to be examined. these recommendations are indicative of the extensive involvement of the state in the reproduction and transformation of agricultural production and certainly suggest the emergence of dependency and the almost complete erosion of the autonomy of small producers. some further, and perhaps less obvious, characteristics of the role of the state may be suggested. if in fact an appropriation of ideologies of pre-capitalist modes of production occurs, what is the concrete 57 character of that appropriation? one example would be the continued affirmation of individual patriarchal ownership (see hedley, 1977:7). this clearly denies the history of productive interdependence of family members in favour of a definition which reproduces an individualistic ideology and the legal subordination of women. at the interpersonal level, this relation is reproduced in the reluctance of federal and provincial bureaucratic agents to deal with farmers' wives in business matters (kohl, 1978:51). kohl states: "the formal definition of the male role as the official 'producer' in north american society is based on and reinforced by the embodiment of that status in law" (1978:51). in marketing, the state has played a primary mediating role in the establishment and control of production quotas through marketing boards. the protection offered to farmers through these agencies is useful only insofar as increases in productivity and conditions of the purchase of quota facilitate the expansion necessary for survival. this places the small producers in an increasingly vulnerable position (cayley, 1973:5). it appears that autonomy in agricultural production has been progressively eroded by the transformation of market conditions. the internal relations of production of the family farm offer a limited amount of protection from these tendencies. the state, while periodically offering limited protection to individual producers, ultimately functions to facilitate that development and expansion of capitalist interests. in spite of these developmental tendencies, the ideology of autonomy derived from private ownership of the means of production persists and is reproduced. in terms of highly visible cultural tendencies, the "back to nature" movement and the purchase of hobby farms by members of high income groups reaffirm the myth of autonomy. loss of ownership (the final loss of autonomy) is explained in terms of the "inefficiency" of producers. this explanation serves to 58 transpose a characteristic defined by the mode of production to a statement of the inadequacy of an individual producer. as long as the loss of autonomy of individual producers can be explained in terms of their individual shortcomings, changes at the level of the social organization of production remain unexamined. the framework for analysis outlined in the preceding discussion yields several areas requiring further investigation: 1. the persistence of farm based independent commodity production in certain sectors delimited by type of production, geography and culture needs to be examined. to what extent does independent commodity production in these sectors serve the interests of capitalist expansion? that is, to what extent are the risks borne by the producers such that corporatization of that sector would be a poor investment? a further question raised is the extent that corporatization of agriculture is impeded by traditional practices and by cultural considerations. research into these questions would contribute greatly to an understanding of the transformation of farming which occurs with the emergence of capitalism in ontario. 2. the relations of production on the family farm, i have argued, offer certain limited protection to the enterprise by providing some flexibility. in the present day, the most significant contribution of family members residing on small farms may be the income they derive from other sources. a work-farm pattern is emerging in canadian agriculture. in ontario, it would be worthwhile to look at the wage contributions of farm wives as i suspect they may be significant for the persistence of many small farm operations. the transformation from interdependence in production of family members to dependence on wage inputs for security of the farm is a phenomenon which remains unexamined. 3. a third area requiring elaboration is the role of the state. 59 critical analyses of the state are fairly recent and the complexity of thia task makes it formidable. such analyses as applied to farming would have to encompass the mediating role of the state in the market, the ideological function of the state and political parties* and the history and impact of agrarian protest movements, to mention only several aspects. this task is central to work in agricultural history because of the peculiar relation of political practice to agriculture from the first settlements. while the scope of the analytic task here outlined is broad, a more comprehensive analysis of the determinants of agricultural production is required. it is essential that analyses cease to focus on "inefficiency" and "traditionalism" of individual producers and become recast at the level of explaining individual practice in terms of the social relations of production. the relation between autonomy and individual ownership must be demystified in order that the collective interests of farm producers can be articulated. the realities of productive organization rather than their ideological representations are the only adequate basis for political action of farm producers. department of sociology/ queen's university 60 references cayley, david 1973 "the rise of the national fanners union." this magazine , vol. 7, no. 3. fowke, vernon c. 1946 canadian agricultural policy the historical pattern . toronto: university of toronto press. 1962 "the myth of the self sufficient canadian pioneer." transactions of the royal society of canada , vol. lvi , series iii. hedley, max j. 1976 "independent commodity production and the dynamics of tradition." canadian review of sociology and anthropology , 13, 4. 1977 "transformation of the domestic mode of production." paper presented at the annual meetings of the canadian sociology and anthropology association, fredericton. johnson, leo. 1972 "the development of class in canada in the twentieth century," in g. teeple, ed., capitalism and the national question in canada . toronto: university of toroi.to press. 1974 'the political economy of ontario women in the nineteenth century," in women at work ontario 1850-1930 . toronto: canadian women's educational press. 1979 "precapitalist economic formations and the capitalist market in canada 1911-1971," in j. curtis and w. g. scott, eds., social stratification: canada . scarborough: prentice-hall. jones, robert l. 1977 the history of agriculture in ontario 1613-1880 . toronto: university of toronto press. kohl, seena b. 1976 working together: women and the family in south western saskatchewan . toronto: holt, rinehart and winston. 1978 "women's participation in the north american family farm." women's studies international quarterly , vol. 1, no. 1. mitchell, don. 1975 the politics of food . toronto: james lorimer and co. saffioti, heleieth i. b. 1977 "women, mode of production and social formations." latin american perspectives , vol. 4, nos . 1 § 2. 61 smith, pamela 1978 "comments on the analysis of the political economy of canadian agriculture." paper presented at the political economy session, learned societies meetings, london, ont. taylor, norma 1976 '"all this for three and a half a day': the farm wife," in g. matheson, ed., women in the canadian mosaic . toronto: peter martin associates. warnock, john w. 1971 "the farm crisis" in l. lapierre, e_t. al . , eds., essays on the left. toronto: mcclelland and stewart. 62 the limits of keyncsianism: some theoretical observations john malcolmson the history of advanced capitalism is the history of a statebuttressed, state-controlled and state-regulated capitalism. for this reason, it is no longer possible to speak of vital areas and processes which fall outside of this near pervasive blanket of state intervention. when seen in context, the expansion of the state sector and of state interventionism in general form part of a larger dynamic at work in the advanced capitalist economies. the growth of the service and repair sectors, the proliferation of intermediary functions, the emergence of a complex networv of advertising and marketing, the establishment of a growing research sector, the extension of consumer credit all of these developments and others reflect the increasing technical socialization of the labour process as well as the increasing complexity of the sphere of commodity circulation. all in all, advanced capitalism faces growing difficulties in its attempts to realize value (mandel, 1978: 401-3). the expansion of the state sector has absorbed much of the growth in some of these areas. together with the emergence of state planning and of extensive state involvement in the socialization of private sector costs and risks, this overall expansion can be seen as an attempt, by the state, to assist capital in the transcendence of those barriers it finds in its path. in other words, the state attempts to secure the social existence of capital through the mobilization of counter-tendencies to capitalist crisis. thus, despite changes in the nature of capitalism and changes in the nature of state activity, the specific modes of intervention still reflect the attempt to meet certain form-specific needs associated with the maintenance of the capitalist order. generally speaking, there is an inherent trend under late capitalism for the state to incorporate an ever greater number of productive and reproductive sectors into the 'general conditions of production' which it finances (mandel, 1978: 484). the origins of the modern interventionist state can be traced back to the immediate postwar period. the immediate problem facing capital and the state was one of conversion to a peacetime economy. it had taken a world war to lift international capitalism out of a decade of stagnation and unemployment, during which the social and political cohesion of the capitalist order faced serious challenge. experiences gained in managing a wartime economy had demonstrated the potential inherent in state intervention, i.e. the ability of the state to virtually end unemployment and to set the economy back on the course of expansion and growth. clearly, the lessons derived from these experiences were not lost on capital and the state. the conversion to a peacetime economy could not involve a return to the disruptive boom-bust cycle of earlier times. a dismantling of the war machine 88 could not lead to the threat of a sudden contraction of business activity. the best that might be hoped for was some sort of balance between private sector activity and public sector intervention, a balance that could assure those conditions necessary for continued capital investment and economic growth. these considerations demonstrate that the growth of state interventionism is not something that can be observed and analysed apart from an analysis of the balance of forces in the class struggle. the state's conversion to a program of fiscal and monetary management (of which commitment to a policy of full employment is but one aspect) was itself a reflection of the need to deflect working class opposition away from any radical alternative. steps taken in the construction of the welfare state symbolize the effort by the state to integrate labour into a postwar 'settlement' or consensus, something essential for the maintenance of relative stability and class harmony and for the attainment of economic growth. certain aspects of the welfare state can even be seen as tactical victories for the working class and its organizations, as instances where the working class has been able to "impose its political will on the logic of capital within capitalist relations" (altvater, 1976: 3). all of these factors suggest that the actual character of state intervention is something largely dependent upon the nature of the class struggle and its outcome (i.e. 'the relative contingency of the political process'). keynesian economics represents an attempt to guide and theorize the practice of state fiscal and monetary intervention in the advanced capitalist economies. to keynes, the laissez-faire liberal image of the state (i.e. the best state is that which governs least) was hopelessly inadequate in the face of chronic economic stagnation and 89 massive unemployment. classical economy had erred in assuming that the capitalist market was an inherently self-correcting mechanism and that any prolonged imbalance between supply and demand, producing unemployment or idle capacity, was impossible. in the keynesian system, the central postulate was that market equilibrium was possible at any level of employment, the latter being dependent upon the volume of effective demand. full employment is, therefore, not something towards which an economy will naturally tend. it is, rather an "optimum relationship" to be produced only by either "accident or design" (keynes, 1965: 28). the unimpeded interaction of market forces is something just as likely to produce stagnation as prosperity, a colossal wastage of resources instead of their efficient employment. thus, the ostensible object of government policy was the attainment of full employment via a policy of selective state intervention. the short term manipulation of key economic variables by the state is what is termed economic 'finetuning*, a practice designed to level out the disruptive boom-bust cycle of capitalism and to attain a state of permanent 'quasi-boom' . in the keynesian system, a given rate of investment and a given 2 'propensity to consume' will together bring forth an actual volume of effective demand which, in turn, will determine a definite level of employment consistent with economic equilibrium. when effective demand, the sum of the demand for capital and consumption goods, is equal to a nation's total income (i.e. total savings = total investments), the economic system will operate at a full employment equilibrium. if effective demand falters, then savings will exceed investments, total income will drop and unemployment will result. in setting forth this model, keynes was explicitly ressurecting the "great puzzle of effective demand" which, with ricardo, had vanished from the realm of 90 orthodox economic theory to lead a subterranean existence in the underworlds of gesell, douglas and marx (keynes, 1965: 32). and in doing so, keynes was concentrating his attack upon say's law, the idea of a selfequilibrating market. the mere fact that savings and investments may be defined the same way (as the excess of income over consumption) does not necessarily mean that the two will always tend to coincide in actual practice (keynes, 1965: 63, 83-4). the factors which determine the former are distinct and separate from those influencing the latter. in the final analysis, the nature of the equilibrium will depend upon the level of aggregate effective demand. in a mature capitalist economy, keynes felt there were valid reasons for suspecting that the level of effective demand would be insufficient to produce equilibrium at full employment. increased income will augment consumption but not by so much as the initial increase in income. keynes, (1965: 27) attributed this to the psychological propensity to consume consequent upon the increase in material affluence. therefore to increase and justify increased employment, there must be an amount of current investment sufficient to absorb the excess of total output over what the community chooses to consume when employment is at the given level. for unless there is this amount of investment, the receipts of the entrepreneurs will be less than is required to induce them to offer the given amount of employment (keynes, 1965: 27). thus, the question of investment was central to the keynesian model. the health of a mature capitalist economy depends upon the maintenance of an appropriate level of capital investment. acceptance of this principle leads, in keynes' mind, to the same conclusion as before, namely, that employment can only increase pari passu with an 91 increase in investment; unless, indeed, there is a change in the propensity to consume (1965: 98). however, as with consumption, a mature capitalist economy tended to throw up barriers to the productive investment of capital which served to weaken the incentive to invest on the part of the individual capitalist (i.e. the saturation of investment outlets, the declining marginal efficiency of capital etc.). additional factors such as the prevailing 'business mood' and the cost of borrowing might induce an investment strike as capital exercises a 'liquidity preference'. all in all, these factors held out the distinct possibility of a secular tendency to stagnation as the incentive to private investment weakened. the object of state policy, given these factors, was to ensure the attainment of a full employment equilibrium through the use of fiscal and monetary devices designed to strengthen both the incentive to invest as well as the society's 'propensity to consume'. here, the overriding importance of investment was clear. as david horowit: states (1973: 92) , by stressing the pre-eminent significance of the investment decision, in determining the level of output and employment, and by illuminating the dependence of that decision on the expectation of investors, keynes provided the key to a theory of fiscal politics which would show that the pattern of government spending must fall predominantly within the channels coincident with business interest. keynes was enough of a realist to know that any state authority that failed to provide the necessary framework for business expansion would soon find the economy in the throes of a major depression. indeed, it was the duty of the state to ensure that investment and accumulation materialized, even despite what might be the temporary whims of capital. keynes writes: it is not the ownership of the instruments of production which it is important for the state 92 to assume. if the state is able to determine the aggregate amount of resources .devoted to augmenting the instruments and the basic rate of reward to those who own them, it will have accomplished all that is necessary. moreover, the necessary measures of socialization can be introduced gradually and without a break in the general traditions of society (1965: 378). the object is therefore one of saving capitalism and for this reason it is completely erroneous to view keynes as a socialist. in the words of maurice dobb, despite an inclination epater les bourgeois and to patronize heretics, he went no further than the position of an interventist liberal, alive to the needs of his time (1977: 220). in practical terms, keynesian fiscal and monetary policy aims at the stimulation of both investment and consumption. "for it is unlikely," keynes writes, that full employment can be maintained, whatever we may do about investment, with the existing propensity to consume. there is room, therefore, for both policies to operate together; to promote investment and, at the same time, to promote consumption... i should readily concede that the wisest course is to advance on both fronts at once (1965: 325). to this end, the state should attune its monetary policy (lower interest rates, a flexible money supply) and its fiscal policy (taxation, subsidization, welfare spending etc.) in the attempt to surmount the overall deficiencies in the level of effective demand. keynes* approach to the problems of capital accumulation, with its emphasis upon the key variable, effective demand, is indicative of a highly abstract and ahistorical conceptualization of the nature of production founded upon capital. in general, the aggregates and categories used by keynes posit the essence of capitalist production as production for use and consumption, and not as production for value . "capital", writes keynes, "is not a self-subsistent entity existing apart from 93 consumption" (keynes, 1965: 106). consumption must be seen as the object and purpose of all economic activity (mattick, 1974: 11). the implications of this approach are far reaching in a number of areas. to take a concrete example, the keynesian concept of 'national income' (i.e. consumption investment) establishes a separation between its two major components only to blur the distinction by evaluating the significance of these components primarily in terms of their impact upon the level of effective demand. shigeto tsuru (1968: 194) wtites, the result is the keynesian concept of national income which has only one dimension, that of being consumable sooner or later . the part which is consumed during a given period is called 'consumption 1 , and the remainder in whatever physical form it may be, is called 'investment'. tsuru goes on to demonstrate that a methodology based upon what is essentially crude aggregation cannot accurately gauge what he terms the 'productivity effect' of consumption and investment, or the actual significance of consumption expenditure and investment outlays vis-a-vis the accumulation of capital. paul mattick (1974: 116) develops a similar point in greater detail in his discussion of the role of the 'multiplier* within the keynesian system. given the existence of idle capacity and unemployed workers during a depression, state expenditures are seen as 'pump priming' devices that stimulate a resumption of private sector business activity. an initial expenditure in the area of public works or welfare assistance initiates a chain reaction of subsequent expenditures (the precise quantitative dimensions of which depend upon the society's marginal propensity to consume), thereby multiplying the cumulative impact of the initial outlay. given this process, state expenditure might well be seen as a panacea whose curative powers are sufficient to overcome the shortfall in effective demand. 94 however, as mattick points out, there are serious problems inherent in the multiplier concept, which, in the final analysis, are rooted in the nature of state intervention and state spending within a capitalist economy. firstly, the multiplier concept creates the illusion... that any given amount of additional income can multiply itself merely by travelling from one group to another. actually, of course, this is not so, just as a change in the velocity of money does not imply a change in its quantity or in the quantity of commodities in circulation (mattick, 1974: 158). he adds that it is only when money spent in consumption finds its way into productive investment that any real increase in income takes place. secondly, a problem emerges because the state is not a capitalist and must therefore finance its activities out of revenue in the form of taxes, or out of borrowing. whereas the private sector is involved in the direct creation of surplus value, direct state involvement in production is usually confined to a series of non-productive enclaves vital for the economy as a whole but unprofitable for private investment and exploitation. for this reason, almost all forms of state expenditure must be seen as forms of consumption of surplus value within the context of the capitalist system as a whole. even in the case of government contracts with the private sector, the costs associated with this kind of induced production as well as the profits that accrue to the private suppliers must be financed out of taxes on the private productive base or out of borrowings against the future profitability of that same base (mattick, 1974: 118). in either case the state appropriates a portion of the surplus value generated in the private sector and for this reason alone state finance must be labelled unproductive from the standpoint of the whole system (yaffe, 1973: 51). 95 the multiplier effect of state spending is therefore largely illusory, despite the fact that the stimulus of government spending may help arrest a downward trend in business activity. mattick (1974: 1s9) notes that as state spending may ease unemployment and increase production in the private sector, it may under special conditions, induce an acceleration of private investments. if this should be the case, it would increase total income by more than that brought forth by deficit-spending, but this 'multiplication' would be due directly to the additional profitable investments, not to the initial spending. in the case of deficit spending, the overall complex of capitalist valorization problems find their expression in the cumulative growth of the national debt. attempts to rationalize this indebtedness usually rest upon the claim that a rising national income will offset the problems associated with increased borrowing and debt servicing. it is, however, impossible to gauge the stimulative impact of deficit financing if comparisons are made on the basis of total national income. as mattick states, the growing national debt cannot be related to total national income, but only to that part of the total which has not been injected into the economy by the government. it is by counting an expense as an income that the illusion arises that the growing national debt is neutralized by a rising national income (1974: 162). the upshot of this analysis may be summed up as follows. state spending can only be viewed as a consumption of surplus value, or better, a redistributive appropriation and consumption of surplus value with an aim to establish and maintain certain, historically-specific 'general material conditions of production' in the era of advanced capitalism. this expenditure cannot be viewed simply as one vital input amidst a complex of socially-necessary tasks and functions which together constitute 96 the system of production based upon capital. a perspective like this tends to abstract the technical aspects of an advanced division of labour away from the social relations which constitute capitalist production as a valorization process, and, in doing so, it loses sight of the fact that only labour undertaken within the capital relation can be productive of surplus value. the result is an analysis which downplays the limits of state intervention, which, ultimately, stem from the fact that the state is not a capitalist and that the state must therefore appropriate and consume surplus value in the course of its interventions. given this understanding, state expenditure and state intervention can best be seen as "indirectly productive for capital in the sense used by marx" they constitute essential moments apart from capital which, nonetheless, make a vital contribution to the social conditions of capitalist reproduction (fine and harris, 1976: 104-5). the limits of contemporary state intervention inhere in the very nature of the form-specific functions the state is called upon to provide within the context of advanced capitalism. the use of fiscal and monetary devices to attenuate the business cycle and prevent the re-emergence of dangerously high levels of unemployment has served to displace the locus of contradiction and crisis to the level of the state itself. the cumulative growth of public debt, the mounting burden of debt servicing and the bias of permanent inflation together represent the price paid by 'capital in general 1 for the maintenance of state-buttressed 'prosperity' amidst conditions of declining profitability in vital sectors and growing difficulties in the sphere of commodity circulation. state intervention in the form of 'demand management' and an expanded money supply has served to arrest the necessary destruction of excess capitals in the economic crisis and to hinder the concentration and 97 re-organization of the capital structure necessary for a profitable upswing in business activity (itoh, 1978: 6-7). the use of credit leverage and deficit financing to further this end has led to the current phenomenon of 'stagflation', a steady and seemingly inexorable rise in the cost of living amidst either sluggish or non-existent growth rates. all in all, capital in crisis stands in need of a depression, a 'shake-out' that the state dare not risk in view of its likely social and political consequences. the current strategy of keynesian intervention, based as it is upon the use of fiscal and monetary means for the redistribution of existing values, cannot penetrate to the heart of the matter for, as fine and harris note, "the dominant recuperative force in crisis is the re-organization of capital and not the redistribution of values" (1976: 111). given this situation, the efficacy of the keynesian devices is severely limited by the expansion of state debt on one side, and the risk of refuelling inflation without any substantial improvement in business activity, on the other (itoh, 1978: 9). the growing obsolescence of keynesianism is reflected in the fact that the current high level of unemployment does not basically result from the needs of distributional struggle (although this plays a secondary related role), but from the need for a break in the circuit of capital to release money, means of production and labour-power so that they can, at a later stage of the cycle, when the expansion capital's circuit is renewed, be re-employed in a circuit based on a re-structuring of productive capital (fine and harris, 1976: 112). in the meantime, the crisis of a state-buttressed capitalism increasingly manifests itself in a crisis of state finance. the stage is thus set for a round of spending cuts, as the state attempts to 'rationalize' its spending and taxation priorities to suit the valorization needs of capital (o'connor, 1973). in the long run, the continued existence of 98 the welfare state, as it is currently known, is placed in serious jeopardy. the current crisis of capital, the fiscal crisis of the state and the growing impotence of keynesian economics all point in the final analysis to the dynamic, yet crisis-ridden course of capitalist development. state intervention, as the continuous and ongoing management of vital economic processes, emerged in a particular conjuncture in response to particular social and economic pressures. for a certain specified period, the efficacy of this intervention was clearly seen and hence unquestioned. yet, the crisis of the 1970' s demonstrates that a state-managed and state-regulated capitalism is still capitalism, still subject to the inner laws of motion that characterize capitalist production, and still subject to the barriers and limits that inhere in the form of capital itself. for this reason, the growing obsolescence of the keynesian prescription can best be seen as reflecting the transition of the capitalist mode of production to a higher phase of development which, in turn, will posit the form-specific functions of the state in a new and qualitatively different manner. whatever the change in state fort! and function, it must, nevertheless, remain consistent with the fom of capital itself and the immanent necessities posited by this form. all in all, the state must always face up to the need of securing the political and social domination of capital and, in doing so, secure the social exsitence of capital itself. conclusion : post-keynesianism? in a wall street journal story, dated september 6, 1974, the following statement is attributed to robert gordon, then president of the american economic association: under keynes' influence, we've developed a theory of aggregate demand but haven't even started to develop a theory of aggregate supply (quoted in morris, 1974: 3) 99 in its own way, an admission like this one reflects a growing feeling that keynesian economics, and modern economic theory in general, docs not provide adequate insight into basic problems regarding capital accumulation and production, problems made more acute with the current economic crisis. current state intervention and emerging future trends in this area also reflect this. given the predicament of 'stagflation 1 , the atmosphere is ripe for the state to undertake new departures in setting the economy back on track, departures that push state intervention beyond the ambit of traditional keynesian practice. massive cutbacks in health, education and social services, inroads into the collective bargaining process and controls on wage increases all mark the arrival of a new phase of state intervention. the precise nature and direction of this new phase is hard to determine as of yet, but it will likely involve efforts to redistribute income away from working-class consumption, to co-opt organized labour into surrendering gains made over decades of struggle and to mobilize state funds in the attempt to remove the structural barriers to sustained capital accumulation. an image of the future that lies in store for the western world might be drawn from an article in the october, 1974 issue of business week . in discussing the problems and imperatives facing american capitalism, the author reaches the following matter-of-fact conclusion : some people will obviously have to do with less... indeed, cities and states, the home mortgage market, small business and the consumer will all get less than they want because the basic health of the u.s. is based on the basic health of its corporations and banks: the biggest borrowers and the biggest lenders (quoted in sweezy and magdoff, 197s: 2). 100 notes there are basic problems involved in simply equating state intcrventionism with keynesianism. as has been stated, much of what came to constitute the keynesian prescription in practice dates back at least as far as world war i and, in addition, certain aspects of modern state practice cannot be traced back to keynes. in spite of this, keynesianism does represent a general theorization of state intervention in advanced capitalism. it is with this general connexion in mind that this paper is based upon the admittedly rather loose and simplistic identification of the two entities. keynes (1965: 8-10) defines 'propensity to consume' as the ensemble of subjective and objective factors that guide the consumption habits and the decision whether to spend or save of individuals and classes. ian gough (1975) argues that it is wrong to see state spending as non-productive for this reason. 101 rfffrf.ncf.s alvater, elmar 1976 "reproduction conditions of the capital relation and the bourgeois state" bulletin of the conference of socialist economists , 5, (1). dobb, maurice 1977 theories of value and distribution since adam smith . london: cambridge. fine, ben and laurence harris 1976 "'state expenditure in advanced capitalism: a critique" new left review, 98. gough, ian 1975 "state expenditures in advanced capitalism" new left review, 92. horowitz, david 1973 the fate of midas and other essays san francisco: ramparts. itoh, makato 1978 "the inflational crisis of world capitalism" capital and class, 4. keynes , john maynard 1965 the general theory of employment, interest and money . new york: harbinger. mandel, ernest 1978 late capitalism london: verso. mattick, paul 1974 marx and keynes • london: merlin. morris , jacob 1974 "stagflation" monthly review, 26, (7). o'connor, james 1973 the fiscal crisis of the statenew york: st. martins. 102 sweezy, paul and harry magdoff 1975 "the economic crisis in historical perspective, part ii" monthly review 26, (11). tsuru, shigeto 1968 "keynes versus marx: the methodology of aggregates" in david horowitz ed. , marx and modern economics new york: monthly review. yaffe, david 1973 "the crisis of profitability" new left review, 80. 103 | 255 an interview with noam chomsky democracy and the public university rebecca schein is assistant professor and acting coordinator of the human rights stream at the institute of interdisciplinary studies, carleton university (ottawa, canada) . her teaching and research interests include: nationalism and cosmopolitanism; citizenship and civic pedagogies; social movements; social and economic rights; science studies . research projects include: a critical cultural study of the u .s . peace corps and american cosmopolitanism; an examination of “risk management”, data ownership, and contemporary ideals of competent citizenship . noam chomsky is a political theorist and activist, and institute professor emeritus of linguistics at the massachusetts institute of technology (massachusetts, u .s .a) . in addition to his work in linguistics, chomsky has written widely on u .s . foreign and domestic policy, power and ideology, as well as the corporate media . having authored more than 100 books, his most recent include: profit over people, rogue states, the essential chomsky, and power and terror . noam chomsky was interviewed by rebecca schein at carleton university on april 8, 2011 .1 rebecca schein (rs): the title of this discussion was “democracy and the public university” and i thought i would start with a really big question which is what do we mean when we talk about a public university? what is it that makes a public university? noam chomsky (nc): well there’s a technical definition. this depends on who is in charge of the administration, the finances and so on. it’s either the government or the private institution. if it’s the government it’s a public university, if it’s a private institution it’s a private university. actually that’s just technical–the boundaries are extremely flexible. take my own university, mit. technically it’s a private university, but it’s overwhelmingly subsidized by the government. in fact when i got there in 1955 and up through the early 1970s probably ninety percent of the academic program was paid by the pentagon. the political science department was openly funded by the cia until the early 60s, when it got kind of embarrassing. after that some other technique was used and since then the funding has shifted for interesting reasons having to do with the nature of the economy. so 1  interview transcribed by kate gentle. a recording of this interview is available at: http:// www1.carleton.ca/iis/news/noam-chomsky/ an interview with noam chomsky democracy and the public university 256 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times technically, mit is private but from another point of view it’s public. the administration is private and the trustees are not specifically responsible to state authorities. on the other hand, if you go down the street to the university of massachusetts it’s entirely public and also gets some funding from the federal government. harvard has the biggest private endowment in the world. it’s a private university but again there is plenty of government funded work going on. rs: most of us are probably not imagining a time of pentagon funding or its equivalent when we talk about the need to defend or restore the public-ness of our universities, nor would most of us be likely to see pentagon funding as supportive of a democratic mission for universities. what is the relationship between democracy and a university’s public-ness? nc: you just can’t draw mechanical conclusions about how research will be carried out from the source of the funding. a lot of my friends on the left think that if you are pentagon funded you must be working for the military. its exactly the opposite. when you were pentagon funded they didn’t care what you did. if you wanted to overthrow the government in your spare time that’s ok. in 1968, when mit was completely pentagon funded, i was in a lab that was one-hundred percent funded by the three armed services. that lab was also the centre of anti-war resistance in the country. several of us, including me, were on the verge of long jail sentences. that was all under pentagon funding and there was no interference. for twenty-five years i was teaching undergraduate courses in social and political issues and social change. they were open to the community and usually met in the evening. i was doing them in my own time but the university didn’t shut them down. a lot of the students who came out were involved in the activism of the 60s. some of the former students are doing things right now. as i say, it was the centre of anti-war resistance but there was no interference. there was a little harassment of the courses from the fbi but not from the pentagon. interestingly, it was the increase in corporate funding through the later period that led to greater secrecy. in 1969, there was a period of a lot of student activism [at mit]. there were protests about military labs, which were administered by mit, and it was reaching a crisis which nobody wanted. so everybody did what you do when there’s a crisis–you establish a commission to look into it. i was on the commission which looked into institute financing. it turned out that about half the institute budget was administering | 257 the military labs, and the other half was the academic budget. the military labs did classified secret military work, but that was kind of a joke too. technically it was secret, but the academic side was open. again a kind of porous distinction. of the academic budget in 1969 maybe ninety percent was pentagon funded. there was no war work except for the political science department. the political science department was involved in pacification programs in vietnam, and naturally this was under the rubric of a peace research institute. they had secret seminars and things like that, which you’re not supposed to have, but outside the political science department there was no dedicated war work. the pentagon was not funding war work–they were funding the high tech economy. the pentagon was a technique. they were deluding tax payers into providing funds for the future benefit of private corporations. the pentagon funded advances in computing, the development of the internet, lasers–in fact the whole it revolution that enabled the high tech economy. the funding for innovation and initiative comes in many ways through the state sector, and for business that’s great. they wait around and eventually reap the profits of publicly resourced innovation. the tax payers pay them on the assumption that we’re saving ourselves from the russians or something like that. that’s basically the system. through the 50’s and the 60’s the cutting edge of the economy was electronics-based, and the pentagon was a good cover for that sort of research. now the cutting edge of the economy is more biology based. so we see funding shift to other government institutes like the national institutes of health. the shift in the sources of government money largely reflects the direction of the economy is headed, just as it did in the 1950’s and 60’s around mit and other research universities. this happens all over the country. mit is extreme but it is all over stanford, north carolina and so on. around the research universities you get small start ups. those are faculty members who are using the government funded research and development to start up small businesses. back then they were electronics-based, and if they were successful they’d be bought up by raytheon and i-tech and other big high tech companies. now if you go around the campus the start-ups are genetic engineering, biotechnology, pharmaceuticals, and the big buildings around are novartis and all these guys who want to milk the research an interview with noam chomsky democracy and the public university 258 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times development that is going on under government auspices in the university. that’s the basis for a lot of the economy. this goes a long way back but it really took off after the second world war–partly because of changes in the nature of science and technology. in the 1950’s, when i was there, mit was actually an engineering school: you went there if you wanted to build things. now if you want to build a bridge or an electric circuit you go to wentworth institute or some other place. mit is a science university–you study basic science and basic math and you take pretty much the same courses whether you’re in aeronautical engineering or electrical engineering. the technology changes fast, so if the students learns the technology of today, they won’t be able to get a job twenty years from now. technology will be different. if they learn fundamental science they can grow with it. so everything changed. the same is true in the biological-based areas such as pharmaceuticals. at the same time, we see an increase in corporate funding in universities, and that has to do not with changes in science and technology, but with changes in the way the economy is structured. there is more of an effort to build a business model for everything, and corporate funding is part of that picture. corporate funding has an effect. for one thing it tends to drive research towards short term applied work. when the pentagon or nih is funding something, they’re thinking about the long term health of the economy. when merck is funding something, they want something for themselves, not their competitors, and they want it tomorrow. so you end up getting more short term applied research. you also get secrecy for the first time. there was no secrecy under the pentagon. they wanted to be as open as possible because it just impedes communication between scientists and engineers. in fact there was no security in the buildings. you could walk in twenty-four hours a day. a corporation may not be able to enforce secrecy, but it can make it clear that you’re not going to get your contract renewed if something gets out. so there’s a coarsening effect, which you’d expect when a business model is imposed on research. rs: so is it reasonable to think that public universities, specifically, have a democratic function? can you spell out the relationship between publicness and democracy? nc: well you know, mit was a private university which means you have to pay tuition to get in. the tuition is not exorbitant, but it’s tuition. a public university is supposed to be free. its supposed to be for the | 259 public. that used to be the case. the university of pennsylvania is an ivy league college, and when i went it was one hundred dollars. you could easily get a scholarship, which i did. working students could get a scholarship. now it’s probably $20, 000, $30,000 and the public universities have changed radically since the 1970’s. i don’t know about here in canada. i’m talking about the united states. let me give you a personal example. a couple of months ago i happened to be giving talks in mexico city at the national university. it’s a big university–it has a couple of hundred thousand students, pretty high quality, good facilities, smart students, good faculty, low salaries by our standards but quite an efficient, good university. a perfectly respectable university. it’s free. ten years ago the government tried to slightly raise tuition. there was a national student strike and the government backed off. in fact one of the main administration buildings on campus, i discovered, is still occupied by students from that strike and it has become kind of a movement centre, a community activities centre. the administration doesn’t like it. a lot of the students don’t like it, but they’re not calling in the police to throw them out. in mexico city there is a public university that is not only free but open admissions, so it’s open to everyone. they have compensatory courses because a lot of the students don’t have the right background. i was there, met students, talked to faculty. it was pretty impressive. mexico is a very poor country, and i went from there to california, which is maybe the richest place in the world. in california they are consciously destroying the best public education system in the world. the california public education system was pretty amazing. the universities were great universities. there’s lower tiers like state colleges, lower colleges, other universities, all quite high level, and they used to be free. tuitions have gone sky high. in fact its very likely that berkeley and ucla, the two stars in the system, will be privatized. they’re almost private universities now if you look at the tuition and the endowments,. the rest of the system will be lowered in quality–more vocationally oriented and less funding. that’s one of the richest places in the world. in fact this year for the first time i think less than half of the cost of the university is provided by public funding. mostly it’s tuition. that’s true in many states in the united states now. these are all steps towards privatizing society and creating a kind of two-tiered society– these are big processes, happening not just in universities. none of this is economically driven. you can an interview with noam chomsky democracy and the public university 260 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times see that by comparing mexico to the united states. mexico is a very poor country. the united states is the richest country in history. so it’s not economic. these are social decisions both in mexico and in the united states. what’s a public university supposed to be? like mexico. it should be free, there should be an option for open admissions, and resources should go into it to making sure it works. it is not impossible. rs: rising tuition fees, increasing reliance on student fees for operating budgets, endowments–to what extent do you see all these trends as part of a general divestment from the public sphere? nc: its partly general, but i think some of this is oriented specifically toward the universities. this hasn’t really been studied so i’m just telling you what i think. all of this stuff began in the 70’s. there were a lot of changes in the economy in the 70’s, but one crucial thing changed with regard to the universities. the late 60’s was a period of a lot of activism and it terrified the business world and it also terrified liberal intellectuals across the spectrum. they were terrified. “the students are out of control, there’s too much democracy, what are we going to do?” there’s some very interesting reactions that you can read. there are two main ones at the opposite ends of the spectrum and they’re worth looking up. one of them is a book and the other you can find on the internet. at the right end of the spectrum, we have the powell memo. lewis powell, was a corporate lawyer who became a justice of the supreme court, and he wrote a memorandum to the education committee of the chamber of commerce in 1971. his memorandum was essentially reflected the paranoia of the business world. the business world is basically totalitarian. they’re used to running everything, and if anything gets out of control the world is falling apart. that’s a typical aspect of the totalitarian mentality. it shows up in foreign policy and all over the place. so his perspective was that the whole university system, as well as the media, television, and even the government, had been taken over by raging marxist lunatics. all of this is so surreal if you know anything about the facts. you’d laugh if you didn’t understand that this is a natural perception of the totalitarian mentality. you can’t allow anything to get out of control, and its true, things were partially out of control. so herbert marcuse was teaching some students in harvard that ralph nader was popular, and to the business world that meant that all the world was falling apart. so powell wrote to the chamber of commerce, the main business lobby, saying we’ve got to do something to “restore | 261 the balance”. do something to make sure that in the universities, in television, in the media, there’s at least some small voice that says the united states is not nazi germany and maybe something in american history is not just extermination and massacre. powell says to the business world, look, we’re the trustees of the universities, we’re the ones who make the decisions, we provide the tax funds, and we own the media. we ought to mobilize instead of letting ralph nader and herbert marcuse steal the whole world away from us. we ought to mobilize and use our power to “restore the balance”. powell’s suggestions were followed by the business world in all kinds of ways, and i think one of them is raising tuitions. its at that time that tuition starts to go up. that’s a disciplinary technique. kids in the 60’s assumed, “i can take off for a couple of years and become a political activist and work for women’s rights or civil rights, then i can come back and pick up my career.” that’s a dangerous situation–it frees people to think and that’s a terrible idea. so what you want to do is trap them. maybe some guy thinks that he wants to be a public interest lawyer. if you make sure he comes out of law school $100,000 in debt, he’s going to go into a corporate law firm because he just has no choice. once he’s in there he’ll internalize the culture and he’ll be safe. it’s the same across the board. raising tuition is a disciplinary technique. so we have the powell memo on the right. on the other end of the spectrum, which is in a way even more interesting, there’s an important book called the crisis of democracy. it comes out in 1974 and it’s the first publication of the trilateral commission. (the trilateral commission brought together liberal internationalists in the three major state capitalist societies–north america, western europe, japan. to get the tenor of it that’s what the carter administration was drawn from.) well what’s the crisis of democracy? the crisis of democracy is that there’s too much democracy. segments of the population that are usually passive and apathetic and obedient are entering the public arena and pressing their demands–women, youth, the elderly, workers and farmers. the population, in other words, or what they call the special interests. and that’s too much pressure on the state. they can’t deal with all the special interests. they have to be beaten back to establish what they called more moderation in democracy. with regard to the schools it was quite interesting. they said that the institutions that are responsible for the indoctrination of an interview with noam chomsky democracy and the public university 262 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times the young are not doing their job. schools, universities, churches– they’re not indoctrinating the young properly.” (this is the liberals that i’m talking about!) “we’ve got to do something to make sure they indoctrinate the young properly.” then comes various suggestions. they even wanted to control the media, because they’re too adversarial and free. well the two ends of the political spectrum are almost identical and that tells you something. my strong suspicion is that the attacks on public universities, including things like tuition, quite possibly came out of this whole sort of mentality. it was related to things happening in the economy. this is the period in the 1970s when the postwar economy was being dismantled–we see moves towards financialization and the off shoring of production. a lot of things happened. this was one of them. they tried to re-impose discipline so we wouldn’t have problems from these students, who aren’t indoctrinated properly. i think there was a confluence of all these things and it’s led to the period of increasing repression which we’re living under in the schools and everywhere else. there is a cultural dimension to the transition happening in thte economy–the fear of student independence and the fear of freedom. freedom is a scary thing so you want to make sure people are properly indoctrinated and controlled. you have a lot of debt and not a lot of choices, you’re insecure–you can’t take chances. in fact if you listen to alan greenspan’s testimony to congress every year, he’s crowing about the wonderful economy he’s administering, and he says straight out its best feature is what he calls “growing worker insecurity.” that’s the best feature of the economy and that makes sense on his assumptions. growing worker insecurity means that working people are afraid to ask for a raise in wages, decent working conditions, for secure jobs and so on. they’ll just grab on to anything they can, and that’s great. it makes the economy more healthy by standard economic principles. so yes, growing worker insecurity is a great thing and it’s the same with students. if they’re insecure they’re not going to go out onto the streets and demand things, and think about things. my feeling is that all of this is tied together very closely. rs: so if students are disciplined by things like rising student debt and rising student fees, you could also argue that the people who are in charge of indoctrinating those students are also disciplined by this casualization of the labour force. nc: that’s right because you have to discipline both students and teachers. when the trilateral commission goes after the institutions | 263 responsible for the indoctrination for the young, they’re saying it’s the teachers, the ministers, church figures, the people in charge are out of control. they’re out of control so they have to be disciplined. and its called casualization of the labour force, or cut backs, threats to tenure, and so on. that is disciplining the faculty. academic freedom always had two aspects. the freedom to teach and the freedom to learn and you’ve got to cut them both back if you want to really control people. rs: i think that you have said that you are uneasy about the notion of a politically engaged university, but that you also think that universities have a responsibility to foster political engagement. could you say more about that? nc: well take mit. i didn’t think myself that mit ought to become involved in the anti-war movement. it’s not their job. nor did i think they should become involved in the war. if they’re going to develop technology for the military they ought to also be developing technology for guerilla resistance. but in fact they should be doing neither. however, the university should be an open arena for people to get involved, and as i said, mit was at the centre of academic anti-war resistance. i think it was 1968 that the whole university was closed down for a couple of weeks. a small number of students, including mike albert (who now runs z-net), steve shallow, and a few others decided to organize a sanctuary for deserters. that was the kind of thing going on then, mostly in churches. a kid decides he wants to desert, so you organize a sort of sanctuary and people stay with him until the fbi comes and takes him. i should say i was against it. i thought this was just going to crash but their intuition was much better. the deserter was a very interesting young guy from the marines. he knew what he was doing–he had had a lot of briefing, thought about it, knew the consequences, and he wanted to do it. they had a press conference in a room in the student centre and about five people showed up. in about three days the whole institute was closed down. there were thousands of students in the student centre twenty-four hours a day doing everything that students do–everything from smoking pot to having seminars. it was quite exciting. there were two weeks of really active engagement on campus and the institute was virtually closed. a lot of things came out of that experience. one thing that came out of it was the commission i was talking about earlier. another was that an interview with noam chomsky democracy and the public university 264 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times the institute itself officially devoted a full day just to consider the uses of technology in society. this is the main technological institute in the world and the question had never come up. so it was march 4th 1969. the day was set aside for meetings, discussions, rallies, all sorts of things on the uses of technology in society. one thing that came out of that day was the union of concerned scientists, which is still around and very active. the whole culture of the place changed, and it’s never going back to what it was. it’s not as active as it was back in 68 but it’s just a changed place. this is the kind of thing the university ought to be open to. it’s right for the university to concern itself with the uses of technology in society; it should be open to letting these issues be discussed and debated. the discussion that happened at mit had a very good impact broadly over all kinds of subjects. one of the biggest issues in toronto is the school of public affairs that is being endowed by peter munk, who is the head of barrick gold, a big gold mining company. what should be done? mining is an absolute international scandal, extremely destructive. it’s environmentally destructive, it’s destructive of communities all over the place and canada has the worst record in the world for this. gold mining is absolutely the worst. so i think that what monk and the global affairs institute ought to do is investigate mining–gold mining in particular. and don’t just investigate, but offer a voice for people who have no voice. you go down in the summer to visit remote and endangered communities in colombia and they’re trying to protect themselves from mining. they have no voice. nobody’s going to hear them but people here do have a voice and they can support them. that’s a perfectly fine research and teaching engagement for a university, and out of it can come pretty good actions. i think you see things like that all over the place. you’re not trapped by funders. they may want to carry out indoctrination of the young but it doesn’t mean they have to succeed. twenty-first century socialism and the global financial meltdown | 171 twenty-first century socialism and the global financial meltdown: in conversation with michael lebowitz — rebekah wetmore and ryan romard rebekah wetmore and ryan romard1 (rw/rr): the crisis of world capitalism starting in 2007 was the most severe crisis of capitalism since the great depression and thus far the recovery, both globally and within canada, has been weak at best. with this mind, to what extent is the current crisis cyclical and in what ways is this related to a broader, systemic crisis of the capitalist system? michael lebowitz2 (ml): this is not a question for which there is a quick answer. what do we mean by a crisis of capitalism? i distinguish between a crisis in capitalism and a crisis of capitalism. for me, there is only a crisis of capitalism when there is an organized and conscious subject prepared to put an end to capitalism. there are always crises, though, within capitalism. understanding this distinguishes a marxian perspective from the perspective of mainstream neoclassical economists for whom the normal state of capitalism is equilibrium and crises are aberrations. for marx and marxists, crises are inherent in capital’s tendency toward overaccumulation. it is inherent in the nature of capital that its orientation is to grow, to expand — to accumulate, accumulate! in a crisis, though, that process of accumulation is checked. all crises take the form initially of the inability of capital to realise the 1 rebekah wetmore is an independent researcher and community organizer. she has an ma in sociology from acadia university in wolfville, nova scotia. ryan romard is a ma candidate in sociology at acadia university. he studies the sociology of agriculture in cuba. 2 michael a. lebowitz is professor emeritus of economics at simon fraser university in vancouver, canada, and the author of, most recently, the socialist alternative: real human development, and the contradictions of “real socialism”: the conductor and the conducted. he was the director of the program in transformative practice and human development, centro internacional miranda, in caracas, venezuela, from 2006-11. 172 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism surplus value extracted from workers through exploitation in the process of production. if capital is unable to realise the surplus value which is contained within commodities through sale of those commodities, it will cut back on their production. and, the result is unemployment as well as reduced demand for investment—in other words, reduced demand for the sector producing means of production. growing unemployment in both the consumer goods sector and the sector producing means of production means that there will be greater difficulties in selling commodities. thus, the initial emergence of the inability to sell commodities brings with it a deepening crisis within capitalism. part of that deepening of the crisis involves a significant reduction in the values of capital — in the value of raw material stocks, for example, but especially what is called fictitious capital. by fictitious capital, we mean the capital invested in various vehicles which, while linked ultimately to the fortunes of real capital within the spheres of production and circulation, takes on a life of its own. for example, the values of shares in corporations (which have their real basis in the profitability of those corporations) expand significantly in the period of a boom. presumably, these values are related to expectations of that profitability but those stock values are determined instead by prospects of money to be made in the stock market. until the moment of truth, there comes a point as a crisis within the real economy emerges in which there is an enormous destruction of those values contained in this particular form of fictitious capital— i.e., a crisis of the stock market. and this is not the only form of fictitious capital. we’ve seen a great destruction of fictitious capital in the form of various financial instruments such as derivatives, etc. as well as real estate values. all of this has its impact and feeds back on the real, underlying economy to deepen a crisis. none of this explains why crises occur, though—why capital’s drive to expand comes up against barriers. in marx’s capital, he indicated that capital develops an ability to grow by leaps and bounds and comes up against no barriers except those presented by the availability of raw materials and the extent of sales outlets. both those barriers are the result of capital’s tendency for overaccumulation. in the case of the first, marx described how overaccumulation tends to be manifested in lagging production of raw materials and other products whose source is nature. agriculture and extractive industries such as mining, marx noted, are modes of production sui generis — they cannot be expanded in the same way as spheres of production which are users of raw materials. precisely for this reason, then, in an extended period of accumulation, capital often twenty-first century socialism and the global financial meltdown | 173 comes up against the problem of the rising value of raw materials with the result that a greater proportion of capital outlays must be for what is called constant capital. these will be periods in which the rate of profit tends to fall because overaccumulation in industry has as its counterpart underaccumulation in the production of raw materials. you can see my discussion of marx’s argument in ‘the general and the specific in marx’s theory of crisis’, which is reprinted in my book, following marx: method, critique and crisis. the second barrier that marx identified is rooted in the antagonistic conditions within which capital functions — in other words, in the nature of capitalist relations of production themselves (recall that marx stressed that the real barrier of capital is capital itself). capital’s drive to increase the rate of exploitation brings with it a tendency for its ability to produce more and more articles of consumption to come up against a barrier in terms of its ability to realise the surplus value contained in those commodities; this tendency for overproduction of capital often takes the form of intensification of capitalist competition. the begged question, though, is if a rising rate of exploitation is significant, why doesn’t the relatively increased share of income for capital lead to increased capitalist expenditures (investment and consumption)? the answer is that capitalists are not likely to expand productive capacity if there is already unused capacity in the productive sector (because of overaccumulation) and falling profit rates because of the burden of the high costs of raw materials. the situation is one in which workers can’t spend and capitalists won’t. it’s a situation when capitalists choose to place their funds elsewhere—in securities, real estate, etc. i have been describing a crisis which is essentially a cyclical crisis. cyclical crises, though, by definition don’t last. for one, the process of destruction of values can restore the conditions for resumption of profitable production. but crises can be more than cyclical; they can also be structural. when we talk about the overaccumulation of capital, it is essential to recognise that capital does not expand in unison. there is an inherent tendency toward unevenness: some capitals will be the major contributors to the growth and accumulation of capital while others may bear the brunt of the effects of overaccumulation. in particular, there are periods in which capital expands in new areas, new geographical regions, more rapidly than in the old regions of capitalist expansion. this process may reflect new, advanced productive forces (thus, better means of securing relative surplus value) or very high rates of exploitation based upon low real wages and a high length and intensity of work—and sometimes it 174 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism may be both modern techniques and very low wages. this emergence of new capitals and new forms of production provides a basis for a structural crisis — in other words, a crisis which is the result of the changing structure of capital. although it does not occur with the periodicity of a cyclical crisis, this definitely has happened before—in what was called the great depression in england in the latter part of the 19th century (as the result of the growth of production in germany and elsewhere on the continent as well as the us) and in the 1930s (after the growth of mass production in the us and the growth of the rate of exploitation in the 20s). crises in capitalism which embody both cyclical elements but also significant structural elements will be deeper and longer than those which only involve cyclical swings. further, structural crises may generate significant tensions because the change in the geographical locus of capital resulting from unevenness may lead to an attempt to redivide spheres of influence and power (and thus inter-imperialist rivalry). finally, their resolution may require a process of restructuring of capitalist institutions in order to incorporate the new elements and manage these new relations—the obvious case being the restructuring which occurred with the bretton woods agreements after the depression of the 30s and world war ii. i have been stressing this question of restructuring because it is obvious that the current crisis within capitalism is both cyclical and also structural in this sense. there’s been a very significant growth in productive capacity, an accumulation of capital, in centres such as china, south korea, india, brazil, etc. a significant part of the explanation of this process has been the enormous reserve armies of labour in the countryside which could be drawn upon for the expansion of wage labour within industry at wage rates well below the levels in the old capitalist centres. as a result, this has been a period marked by a rising rate of exploitation on a world scale and at the same time a rising demand for raw materials from these new expanding centres of capitalist accumulation (reflected in prosperity in raw material producing centres). both these characteristics tend to generate a crisis within world capitalism; however, within that general crisis, the unevenness is obvious. in the old centres of capital, we see that rather than the expansion of productive capital, money has flowed into finance and real estate; thus, one can speak accurately about the separation of finance capital from productive capital there (much like england’s shift toward rentier capitalism in the late 19th century). but there is more: in the context of capitalist competition and pressures upon profits we see that capital in twenty-first century socialism and the global financial meltdown | 175 these old centres has managed to insulate itself somewhat because of its success in shifting the tax burden to the working class—reducing taxes upon corporations and upon those with high income (who are described as the ‘job creators’). capital has been able to do this because the defeat of the working class in these centres. to describe, though, the growth of finance capital at the expense of productive capital as characteristic of this crisis in capitalism (and especially to see this as a sign of the crisis of capitalism) is an example of onesidedness (which happens to coincide with the location of those who come to this conclusion). it doesn’t look at all like a crisis of capitalism in china, vietnam, india, brazil etc. in short, what we are seeing is a change in the structure of world capitalism, and the attempt to manage the change in that structure is reflected in such developments as the shift from the g7 to the g20. will that restructuring of capital succeed? i suggest that, in the absence of the ability of the working class throughout the world to prevent it, capital will succeed in this as it has in the past. let me turn, though, to a question which you didn’t ask explicitly: is there anything in this existing situation which points to the ultimate, final crisis of capitalism? although there are many marxist economists who are predicting the end of capitalism (something marxist economists are prone to do), my perspective is somewhat different. it is obvious that there is a very serious problem of an emerging ecological crisis to which capital is contributing substantially. however, that is a crisis of humanity—not a crisis of capital. how and if this crisis of humanity can be prevented depends upon a serious movement of working people to put an end to capitalism by all means possible and as soon as possible. and that will be the crisis of capitalism. rw/rr: canada’s prime minister stephan harper has unashamedly promoted the myth that the financial crisis did not greatly affect canada. is this notion of canadian exceptionalism warranted? if not, what might the next couple of years be like for canadians, particularly in light of the recent austerity measures? ml: it is true that canada has not been as affected by the financial crisis as the united states. but that has really little to do with the actions of the harper government. in part, it reflects the difference in the nature of the banking system and the traditions of finance in canada. in part, too, it also reflects the difference in the risk orientation of canadians. but this is not a case of canadian exceptionalism at all. not unless you forget about 176 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism all those other exceptions like chile, ecuador, venezuela, brazil, and indeed all countries exporting raw materials to china and experiencing a boom based upon this. there have been two distinct tendencies affecting the canadian economy. one is the tendency related to the depression in the united states, given canada’s long-term dependence upon that market. the other tendency reflects the resource boom based upon exports to china and other asian countries. those two tendencies reflect the changing structure of world capitalism, and the geographical division involved is reproduced within canada itself. thus, provinces like québec and ontario, which have focused upon manufacturing, are suffering significantly whereas prairie provinces like alberta, saskatchewan and manitoba in particular have been benefiting from their resources. the harper government has thrown its lot in with the latter group of provinces and with the emerging new centres of capital. in its so-called budget bill, its determination to push through pipelines to serve china, its interest in chinese foreign investment, its removal of environmental protection measures, etc, we can see that it is placing a wager on the structural changes in capital. this strategy has major implications for the canadian economy. thomas mulcair of the ndp has raised the question of the ‘dutch disease’ — i.e., the blow to canadian manufacturing as a result of a rising value of the canadian dollar linked to resource exports. i think that’s a bit premature because we cannot say at this point how much of this particular decline is cyclical and how much is structural. however, over a long time period, i think it is correct to talk about the spectre of the dutch disease. the harper government strategy points in the direction of a new model — actually a return to the old model, that of the hewers of wood and drawers of water (i.e., to a hollowing-out of the economy similar to what happened to venezuela over a number of years as the result of its oil wealth). in this period, the two tendencies interact. budget deficits reflect the fate of the old capitals—in particular, the problems in the u.s. economy and the pattern of tax cuts for corporations and high income earners that have occurred here. as in the case of the united states, the defeat of the working class and the weakness of working class institutions has meant the successful imposition of capital’s austerity plan which is an attack on the working class. to this can be added the effect of resource exports which have significantly elevated the value of the canadian dollar relative to that of the us and seriously affected manufacturing exports as well as those of sectors such as the forest industry (and thus employment in these sectors). twenty-first century socialism and the global financial meltdown | 177 of course, it is essential to recognise that these two tendencies are not occurring in two separate worlds. the rapid accumulation of capital in china and other emerging capitalist countries has itself been based on the existence of markets in the developed north. to the extent that the latter continue to slump, it can not help but affect the accumulation of capital in the former and thus their demand for resources. when that happens (and i think the only thing in question will be its extent), canada faces the real prospect of a serious decline. all other things equal, this will accelerate and intensify the capitalist austerity project. so, when you ask the question as to what may the next couple of years be like for canadians, it is difficult to provide a definite answer. it depends. all other things are not necessarily equal. if the working class continues to be defeated, we can look forward to one defeat after another—one attack after another on social services, health and safety, education, everything that people have made sacrifices and struggled to achieve in the past. it’s not, of course, inevitable. nothing is inevitable when it comes to the question of class struggle. rw/rr: in the socialist alternative, you argue that “given the heterogeneity of the collective worker (and its various forms of immiseration) and capital’s use of differences to divide the working class in order to defeat it, a political instrument is needed to mediate among the parts of the collective worker, provide the welcoming space where popular movements can learn from each other and develop the unity necessary to defeat capital..” is the anti-capitalist left in canada ready to form such a party? if not, what can be done to foster the development of this type of party? ml: my immediate response is no, the anti-capitalist left in canada is definitely not ready to form a party which can defeat capital. but there is also the question as to whether an anti-capitalist left as such can ever defeat capital. i doubt that. when i was involved in rebuilding the left in vancouver, i argued that we needed to go beyond organising on the basis of anti-capitalism and instead to stress explicitly the necessity for a socialist alternative. anti-capitalism means something different for everyone. for some people, it is opposition to big corporations; for others, it is opposition to the banks or the capitalist state or money or large-scale industry, international capital or inequality in income and wealth. accordingly, the perceived alternative can range from breaking up the corporations to developing alternative currencies to supporting cooperatives and credit unions to putting an end to private ownership 178 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism of the means of production and to returning simply to the good old days when people could anticipate a good job, a home of their own and all the amenities that their parents had. the multiplicity of views about what we don’t like about capitalism (ie., anti-capitalism) was apparent in the occupy movement. of course people should struggle against every assault by capital and every violation of our conceptions of justice. marx made the point well: without the struggles of workers over wages, workers would be a ‘heartbroken, a weak-minded, a worn-out, unresisting mass’ and would be incapable of any larger struggles. of course, too, it is essential to try to link these struggles. however, in the absence of a positive vision, capital can and will separate and defeat those who oppose it. trade unions under attack and facing capital’s demand for concessions, for example, can look at issues outside their immediate concerns and say, ‘what’s this got to do with our members?’ sometimes, though, capital and the capitalist state make it easier to connect issues. in 1983, a simultaneous blanket assault by the social credit government in bc created conditions in which it was possible to unify teachers, hospital workers, renters, poverty movements and private sector trade unions who were injured by the proposed legislation in a movement toward a general strike. similarly, when capital is in a crisis period and moves to administer its affairs through a general programme of capitalist austerity, it is possible to bring together those under attack—both those suffering from the crisis itself and those under attack by the capitalist state. that is what occupy, the enraged and the middle east spring demonstrate. and, right now that potential is there as the result of the harper government’s so-called budget bill. but, as the disintegration of the general strike movement in bc demonstrated, many ‘no’s’ do not make a big ‘yes’. at the present time, people are fighting against reductions in social services, against measures which make universities and education inaccessible for many, against the removal of measures protecting against the destruction of the environment, against the removal of support for our current healthcare system — against, indeed, many characteristics of what is viewed as our entitlement, an entitlement which didn’t drop from the sky but which was the result of years of struggle. in short, people are struggling out of a sense of fairness. but there’s a difference between struggling over questions of fairness (sometimes identified as characteristic of moral economy) and being able to understand why all this is occurring — enough so to be able to put an end to such attacks. if you don’t undertwenty-first century socialism and the global financial meltdown | 179 stand the underlying factors, you are likely to look upon what you’re fighting for as the restoration of the good old days. marx made this point in talking about the limits of wage struggles. 99% of those struggles, he said, were reactions against capital’s previous actions to drive down wages. they were attempts to restore the traditional standard of life and occurred under the conservative banner of a fair day’s pay for a fair day’s work. and, it was accurate to describe this as a conservative slogan because workers fighting under that banner were seeking to conserve or preserve the pre-existing conditions. while though those struggles were essential for developing their collective strength and dignity, marx stressed the necessity for workers to go beyond those guerrilla wars against capital and its state and to struggle under the revolutionary banner of putting an end to capitalist relations. we need to understand the nature of capitalism, and we need a vision of a socialist alternative if we are to defeat capital. this is my point in the socialist alternative: real human development, where i argue for a vision of socialism which involves social ownership of the means of production, worker and community decision-making and production for social needs rather than exchange. a focus upon human development unifies these elements and, indeed, has the potential to unify all our separate struggles. this vision of a society in which all human beings are able to develop their capacities and realize their potential is the vision contained in the communist manifesto—a society in which ‘the free development of each is the condition for the free development of all’. we need to communicate and struggle for the realization of that vision. defeating capital won’t happen spontaneously through some kind of collective epiphany. it requires conscious effort. but any attempt to create at this point a party to defeat capital would be viewed correctly as just another vanguard sect promising to deliver socialism. it is important to start from people’s conception of fairness and to understand why they are moved to struggle. however, we need to recognise the limits of guerrilla wars against capital and to learn to work together in practice to build an understanding about the nature of capitalism and the need for a socialist vision. that means finding ways to create spaces where popular movements can learn from each other—spaces and new forms like people’s assemblies at every level. we need but we’re not ready to form a socialist party that can defeat capital. but we can develop a socialist project, one which listens, educates and helps to create the basis for a new type of party which is integral to and does not stand over and above social movements. 180 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism rw/rr: drawing on your work in venezuela, cuba and the former soviet union what might a socialistic response to the ongoing economic crisis look like? what has been venezuela’s response to the economic crisis? what can socialists in canada and elsewhere learn from these experiences about how to respond to the crises of capitalism? ml: i’ve just completed a new book, contradictions of ‘real socialism’: the conductor and the conducted, which stressed, among other things, the importance of building upon aspects of the ‘moral economy’ of the working class in the former soviet union in order to move forward to socialism. as we know, however, what did happen was precisely the opposite—an attack on the concepts of fairness and justice of workers as part of the process of moving to capitalism. unfortunately, too, there are many signs in cuba that the response to their current crisis is to move in the same direction although it is still too soon to rule out the possibility that there can be a return to the ideas of che guevara about the importance of building socialist human beings. venezuela, though, does offer some ideas that canadians can draw upon—precisely because it is a capitalist country with resource wealth, has the experience of suffering the dutch disease and now has a government with the articulated goal of building a new socialism different from the experiences of the 20th century. in particular, the government of hugo chavez has decided to use its resource wealth to expand enormously access to health services and education, to reclaim as state property the oil and other basic industries as well as telecommunications, electricity, steel, cement, airlines and a host of other sectors seen as important for satisfying the many needs of venezuelans. by building up local industry, housing and agriculture with oil revenues, it is explicitly attempting to demonstrate that there is nothing inevitable about the dutch disease if you have a government committed to food sovereignty and to creating opportunities for jobs that can serve the needs of people. there are many problems in venezuela, and not the least is the inherited culture of clientalism and corruption (as well as a tendency to populism) to which the chavez government is not at all immune. but there are elements that can inspire many people within canada who don’t think of themselves as part of an anti-capitalist or socialist left. the idea of neighbourhood government where people can work together with their neighbours to solve local problems and to plan (something embodied in the communal councils and communes in venezuela) and the idea twenty-first century socialism and the global financial meltdown | 181 of workers councils (without which, chavez has said, you can’t build socialism)—these are ideas which don’t need oil revenues or major state-directed programmes. this concept of protagonistic democracy, a concept of democracy as practice through which people can develop their potential, can appeal to people precisely because of their sense of their powerlessness in modern capitalist society. are there ideas here for canadian socialists to draw upon in the context of the current crisis and the capitalist austerity programme under way? think about it. taking resource wealth away from private corporations to be used for fostering the education and health of the people and building new socially-owned industry, creating new institutions which allow for the development of the capacities of people through their own practices, i.e., developing the ultimate productive forces—wouldn’t these be elements with which to counter capital’s austerity programme and to substitute for it a socialist austerity programme (i.e., austerity for capital)? consider how different would be the situation in the current crisis in canada if resource revenues were poured back into the economy for education and health and for building and modernising economic activity—investments for the future as well as a means of mitigating (instead of exacerbating) the current crisis. capitalism, as chavez has said, is a perverse system—one which doesn’t care about human beings. we can use the opportunity of the current crisis to demonstrate how it is a system that we need to go beyond. alternate routes a critical review editorial board: jim conley, joan st. laurent alternate routes is an annual publication of graduate students in sociology and anthropology. manuscripts, subscriptions and communications should be addressed to: alternate routes department of sociology and anthropology carleton university ottawa, ontario, canada k1s 6b6 the editorial board wishes to establish a genuine forum for the exchange of ideas. we welcome critical responses, commentaries or rejoinders, which we will endeavour to publish in subsequent the editors gratefully acknowledge the financial assistance of the department of sociology and anthropology, carleton university, and its chairperson, gordon irving. we also wish to thank bev cruikshank for her administrative assistance and karen bouris for for speedy and expert typing. subscriptions : individuals and institutions: $3.50. make cheques payable to alternate routes. copyright 1980, alternate routes, unless otherwise noted. editorial statement alternate routes is a critical review of sociology and related disciplines. we strive to publish the critical work of graduate students which will inform, and be of interest to students and teachers of social science. in our view, sociologists must be critical, both of their own society and of the work of other social analysts. we seek, therefore, to publish work which challenges existing sociological and societal orthodoxies. to achieve this goal we require manuscripts. we encourage graduate students among our readers to submit essays, reviews, commentaries and rejoinders on a wide variety of subjects. we particularly welcome work which treats some aspect of canadian society within the wider concerns of critical social science. isbn 0-7709-0108-5 a critical review vol. 4 1980 contents robert alford (u. of california, santa cruz) elections, state policy and the marxian tradition in political sociology: an interview 1 stella lord (carleton university) the struggle for equal pay for work of equal value: a case study 21 robert white (australian national university) knowledge and power: determinations of educational curriculum 53 john malcolmson (simon fraser university) the limits of keynesianism: some theoretical observations 87 debra clarke (carleton university) the state of cultural theory: a review of past and present fashions 105 digitized by the internet archive in 2011 with funding from carleton university, department of sociology & anthropology http://www.archive.org/details/alternateroutesc04alte elections, state policy and the marxian tradition in political sociology: an interview robert alford introduction like the discipline in general, political sociology in north america has undergone considerable change since the early 1960s. in his career and publications, robert alford reflects many of those changes, which are of more than merely historical interest for scholars working in political sociology. alford is probably best known in canada for the published version of his doctoral thesis, party and society: the anglo-american democracies , in this comparative study of "class voting" in great britain, australia, the united states and canada, he found that canada scored lowest on the index of class voting. although not always welcomed or accepted by them, this seminal work has provided subsequent canadian scholars with an agenda for debates on the methods, conceptions, indicators and explanations concerning the presence of class in canadian elections. from these early pluralist beginnings, alford went on to study the development of health policy in new york, from what might be called an elite perspective, and liter to studies of political participation and urban politics from a broadly marxian perspective, critical of both elite and pluralist approaches. along the way, an article on paradigms in political sociology summarized some of the differences among these approaches. the transformations represented by robert alford' s career, which reflect and are part of broader changes in political sociology, are of more than historical interest because he has attempted to combine the insights, levels of analysis and concepts of pluralist, elite and marxist approaches into a perspective able to deal with the complexities of politics in liberal democracies. the interview is presented in the hope that it will stimulate thought and discussion on the relationships among voting, the operations of state agencies, capital accumulation, and social class. directions for further work are indicated tentatively in the interview, but they need to be developed in theoretical reflection and empirical research on politics in canada and elsewhere. that the interview ends abruptly, with loose ends left dangling, is thus appropriate. robert alford was interviewed at carleton university on march 20, 1980, by jim conley. 1. e.g. r. ogmundson, "party class images and the class vote in canada," american sociological review 40 (1975): 506-512. 2. see the interview for references. j.c. to start from the beginning, you are probably best known in canada for party and society , where you compare class voting in canada, the united states, great britain, and australia. as you no doubt know, it continues to inspire work by canadians such as john myles and others. your recent work seems to take a starting point that's a long way from the pluralist assumptions that were behind party and society . that change seems to reflect wider trends in political sociology in north america. how do you explain this change in north american sociology, and perhaps in robert alford? second, do you consider the kind of voting study you did in party and society to be worthwhile still? if it is and you were to do it today, would you do it differently? in what ways? how would you analyse the electoral system and elections in liberal democracies? r.a. those are large questions and it is a little hard to formulate a coherent and well-developed answer on the spur of the moment. i suppose the quick and easy, but basically accurate answer to the first one is that the change in my own perspective does reflect certain trends in north american political sociology. old problems have persisted and new crises have emerged which cannot be theoretically understood or politically dealt with in the framework of existing political theories or mechanisms for liberal reform. that's the quick answer. i think the change in sociology is more marked than in other social sciences partly because of the more diverse intellectual traditions within sociology. historically, sociology always has been more 1 (chicago: rand mcnally, 1963) influenced by marxist or neo-marxist ideas. even people who have been pluralists have always included some aspects of analysis of the class structure. lipset is the best example. i think his agrarian socialism is a very important work. whatever criticisms you can make of sociology, many in the field recognize the importance of class interests and the class structure for state policy. the critical tradition is not alien to sociology; it remains dormant under some historical conditions and re-etierges under others. with respect to the second part of your question, elections and voting are not merely devices to control or co-opt popular struggles. they are important democratic institutions, however much they are biased and distorted through the ways in which participation is rendered fictitious and despite the pact thct voting and party competition have relatively little effect on major developments. my answer is that voting studies are important, and i don't think they have to be done within a pluralist perspective. i haven't really thought about the issue of how i would do party and society differently. that book differed from the classic pluralist analyses of voting in the sense that i was analyzing class voting as an attribute of the system, rather than examining the factors predisposing individuals to vote in a certain way. the "columbia" and "michigan" traditions were primarily interested in the determinants of the voting decision. you have on the one hand the concern of the michigan school with issues, candidates and party identification as the triple determinants of individual behavior. the classic studies respectively are: bernard berelsen, et al.. voting (chicago: univ. of chicago press, 1954) and angus campbell, et al . , elections and the political order (ny: wiley, 1966). on the other hand, you have the more institutional concern of the columbia school with cross-pressures and the impact of religion versus class in the earliest studies. because i was a student of lipset's i drew more upon the columbia tradition in my dissertation, but i transformed it into a structural analysis of an attribute of the system and not of a set of individual variables predicting individual voting. i still think that was the right way to do it. with different measures, in the light of john myles' critique of the index of class voting and with more theoretically self-conscious and empirically adequate indices of the social base of parties in different regions and nations, such studies can still be useful. now given the line of development of my more recent work, i would look for the links of voting much more with state policy, the political strategies of elites and the changing class situation in particular political units. i now would use a much broader theoretical framework for the analysis of elections and voting. j.c. i found what you said earlier about elections being important a bit surprising. although it may simply be my reading of it, the paper on 4 political participation and public policy you did with roger friedland gives me the impression of a concentration on the symbolic effects of voting and similar forms of political participation, and an emphasis on the social control aspects rather than the policy effects of political participation. r.a. i absolutely agree; i think you stated the point of that article correctly. but elections have both aspects: they are genuine democratic john myles, "differences in the canadian and american class vote: fact or pseudo-fact," american journal of sociology 84, no. 5, march 1979, pp. 1232-1237. "political participation and public policy," annual review of sociology , vol. i, 1975, pp. 429-479. institutions because they provide equal rights to participate to all citizens and because their outcome installs a regime with great potential power over important decisions. the fact that they are genuine gives them great symbolic power as an instrument of social control. that's the paradox. elections have an impact: proposition 13 in california is a good recent example. it was an overwhelming demonstration of the electoral power oi the people. this particular decision had reactionary consequences, but the referendum shows people that their vote has an impact. elections and the machinery of voting, and the biennial and quadrennial spectacles of party competition around congressional and national elections in the united states do absorb the political attention of the population. in that sense they are like sports events: the symbolic function of elections that murray edelman and ike balbus, among others, have emphasized. but they wouldn't have that effect if they did not have genuine and real political import as well. if elections were purely spectacle and thus only symbolic, they would not have that impact. j.c. in a recent paper on the urban fiscal crises, or better, on urban fiscal strains and the way crises are created out of them, you and your co-authors try to analyse the forces making for a rise in public expenditures. in the context of neo-conservative or reactionary attacks on public expenditures (particularly social services) exemplified by proposition 13, which seem to be able to mobilize many people against the visible sources of their personal fiscal strains of taxes, etc., that sort of analysis seems 'roger friedland, frances fox piven, and robert r. alford, "political conflict, urban structure and the fiscal crisis," intl. journal of urban and regional research , vol. 1 #3, oct. 1977, pp. 447-471. an important topic for left sociologists. they are politically important, but as you and your co-authors note at the end of that article, in the absence of any mass movements of political change, they seem also to be politically impotent. do you see that sort of analysis connecting up in any way to political movements, and in more general terms, what role does sociological analysis have in this kind of situation? r.a. well, you're asking three or four related but somewhat different questions. i do think that our point was an important one, namely that there is a potential political basis for challenges to the cuts in public and social services. but i don't see that our analysis or others like it have had much direct impact in mobilizing a reaction to them. the connection between research and intellectual analyses and political movements has always been a highly indirect and mediated one, so that the role of critical analyses of particular policies and their impact in enlivening a movement or providing ammunition for it is quite unclear. j.c. it is also a question that seems to have plagued sociologists. they usually seem to have been particularly concerned about the social and political effects of their work and often try to give what they do some political relevance. it is very obvious in the case of piven and cloward's poor people's movements , where the analysis is intended to inform the strategy of that sort of movement. it is less clear in the case of most other work, but there still seems very often to be some political impetus. r.a. of course piven and cloward are among the few left social scientists who have been actively involved in the movements that they write (new york: vintage books, 1979) about. as you know they were instrumental in helping to shape the welfare rights movement and earlier cloward helped form mobilization for youth in new york city. but it is unclear what their analyses contributed as opposed to their own presence as organizers. it may be that sociologists have to participate directly in order to have an impact, like anybody else. j.c. we've already spoken indirectly about a flowering of marxist sociology in north america. as a paradigm in sociology, is marxism a fragile flower always in danger of fading, or is it a fairly hardy young weed that will strongly resist any attempts to get rid of it? what are the strengths and weaknesses of marxist theory and research in sociology? r.a. that question presupposes an answer to a question that you didn't ask. i think it's a mistake to talk about marxist sociology, because i think that implies that "arxism is a sufficiently comprehensive and adequate theory by itself on which to base an analysis of sorietv. marxist concepts are intrinsically interdisciplinary, and for marx they belong to a "critique of political economy." even that currently popular phrase—"political economy"—seems to me in some ways to be untrue to the spirit of marxism as a critique of the partial theories that derive from the arbitrary disciplinary boundaries of the social sciences and history. there is also another reason why speaking of "marxist sociology" is not a good idea. i think such a usage reinforces and maintains lines of antagonism within political and theoretical debates that are not healthy. that is, it tends to set up a polarization between people who are willing to include themselves as marxists and those who are then willy-nilly in a non-marxist camp, i think that is politically and theoretically dangerous. to answer your question rephrased, i would regard marxism as an intellectual tradition that should be available and dealt with seriously by all sociologists as a very important component both of the education of students and available for people to deal with regardless of the problem they are working on. given that, i would say that the marxist theoretical tradition is developing and likely to have more and more influence, if it avoids the double tendencies towards self-ghettoization and repression: the exclusion of people who use the marxist tradition from jobs, or the intimidation of those who have jobs. while political repression is certainly not created by sectarianism, it is at least made possible to some extent by the tendency of the left to fragment and become hostile sects. you asked about the strengths and weaknesses of marxism as a paradigm in political sociology. let me speak to the strengths first. first, in a marxist analysis crises of the state are not simply exogenous phenomena that burst upon the scene like a storm but are explainable within the structure of the theory and of the society. second, class relations and class conflict are recognized directly and centrally as having an independent causal impact on state policies and state structures. organizations of both capital and of the working class are regarded as among the fundamental forces at work in society, both to shape its structure and to bring about change. to start from those premises as starting points of analysis i think is a contribution of fundamental importance. the main deficiencies of marxism in political sociology are that marxism has no satisfactory theory of the state or of democracy. the recent attempts to develop a concept of the relative autonomy of the state do not go far enough in recognizing the internal dynamics of the state. once institutionally established, separated by the very requirements of capitalist rule, the state 9 cannot be understood in any direct way as representing the interests of the capitalist class. that is recognized in general by the formula "relative autonomy of the state" but not in practical analysis. in concrete analyses these tend to fall back on either an "instrumentalist" or a "structuralist" perspective, either to discover to what extent agents of the capitalist class are directly present in the making of state decisions or to assume that the structure of the state in the "last instance" serves or represents the interests of capital as a whole. neither of these assumptions is a good starting point for analysis. j.c. if i'm not mistaking your position, your solution to that problem is basically to look at the consequences of state policy, at who benefits from state policy. that leaves the question of who is served by state policy open, but it doesn't avoid the functionalist trap of going from who benefits to an implied causal mechanism. the only way to avoid that is to go back and look at the causes of state policies, and it seems to me that the so-called structuralist theory of the state is at least starting to do that. you're correct that there is still this assumption that in the last analysis (a nice loophole) the state will serve the capitalist class or a fraction of the capitalist class. but there is starting to be a recognition, e.g., in poulantzas' state, power, socialism , ' that you have to look at the mechanism by which that happens and an implicit question of whether that is always going to happen. r.a. well, it is certainly inadequate to say "to look at the mechanism" because that formulation still accepts the assumption that "that happens" (i.e. the function for capital) in the normal political process. that assumption is precisely what has to be questioned. that is thr theoretical inadequacy of the marxist tradition at 7 lxmdon: nlb, 1978. 10 this time. i'm obviously gliding over the significant differences among marxists with respect to this question, e.g., among miliband, poulantzas, and o'connor .that leo panitch and others have been trying to specify and which are very important. in talking about the consequences of state policy i wasn't saying that approach will solve all the problems because that is not really a theoretical position but rather an "entry point," the point where you analytically enter this complex system and develop a research question which will enable you to ask something quite concrete. the opposite approach is somewhat easier—to postulate, and be right, incidentally—that the causes of state policies and state structures are constrained in some broad way by the fact that the state exists within the capitalist context. but if one examines the consequences of state policies then i think it's harder tc accept that theoretical postulate. both for causes and consequences, the form and level of class conflict—among other factors—have an impact. i think that in the famous poulantzas-miliband debate they're both right. what i mean by that is that poulantzas is right in arguing that the direct participation of members or agents of the capitalist class is indeed as he puts it "chance and contingent," that it's not necessary for the capitalist class always to be present in order for their interests to be served. but i think miliband was right in sayina that we have to specify the concrete conditions under which specific political elites function and in whose interests they function. you can't postulate that the structure of the state is organized in such a way as to serve capitalist interests either in the short run or in the long run. j.c. there's a difference of levels then. 11 r.a. that's right. the issue must be defined as one about the historical conditions under which different class agents must be mobilized to serve their interests. it has to become a historically concrete problem. i would even argue that if you find members of the capitalist class directly present, it is a sign that they are either losing or in danger of losing. that is, only in political and economic crisis must they become active in order to influence policy. if the state is running smoothly, then in effect they don't have to be active (it is even better that they are not active) to have their interests served. i'm not arguing this empirically; this is a theoretical speculation. now look at what this theoretical position leads to. certain kinds of issues are likely to become public, visible, and then politically open to the participation of more groups. in such instances of crisis the situation has the appearance of pluralism, that is, the outcome is genuinely uncertain. therefore ruling elites and dominant class interests are vulnerable in those moments and must mobilize if the outcome is indeed vital to their interests. yet the outcome is problematic, because the issues have become public and visible and therefore politicized. that's why "mapping" the whole range of state decisions and state policies is important. otherwise you. tend to have a biased sample of either those issues and decisions which are insulated from popular and democratic influence or those which are highly politicized and in which the outcome is genuinely doubtful. j.c. in the article about the urban crisis that we've already referred to, the argument is made that there is a seqreqation between public and o politicized issues dealing with what o'connor calls legitimation and you call political integration, and the insulated ones, out of public view and a the fiscal crisis of the state . new york: st. martin's, 1973. 12 concerned with accumulation. are you saying then that in cases of crisis the ones that are ordinarily insulated become public issues? r.a. no, not necessarily, but if they do then the balance of political and class forces has shifted and the outcome becomes problematic. we are assuming that we are dealing with capitalist societies that are democratic in the sense that mechanisms of participation do make a difference, if popular interests get mobilized. i'm not at all assuming that the balance of power always shifts in moments of crisis, quite the contrary. 9 j.c. both in health care politics and in this urban crisis article, and in contrast to much marxist writing that tends to see crises as more or less automatic results of tendencies of the system, you appear to be arguing that crises are created by elites as a way of resolving strains that exist within the state. r.a. i guess this might be looked at as the transposition into the state of what marxists used to call in the economy a "shakeout," i.e., the destruction or elimination of the less efficient firms in the economic crisis. maybe political crises have that same character, as a way of getting rid of the less efficient state agencies. j.c. it sounds awfully conspiratorial. r.a. no, not necessarily. i don't think we intended to imply (although we may have come close to it) that crises were that free floating and could be created by political elites almost at their will. certainly not. different interests are strategically located at different places to take advantage of crises and to exacerbate them, to define them ideologically in certain ways 9 (chicago: university of chicago press, 1975) 13 or to use them to get leverage in different ways. once a situation like that is in existence, the outcome is to some extent open. they may not be able to control the outcome. popular interests may mobilize and have an impact that could not be foreseen or controlled. and not all crises are created by elites in any direct sense, for example the sort of thing discussed by piven and cloward in poor people's movements . j.c. in party and society you did a comparative study, and in the urban crisis article called for more comparative studies of such phenomena. it seems very often that marxists and left sociologists haven't done that, often i suppose because they find that a lot of very basic work has to be done in their own society before any attempt is made to be comparative (such is the case in canada, i'd say). do you see much prospect for real comparative work that takes account of the different levels of analysis in political sociology? r.a. i think this is a general problem for people working in the marxist tradition and for others. perhaps it is more difficult for people working in the marxist tradition because of their refusal to see different levels or different units of analysis as autonomous. the best marxist analyses are both multi-level and historical, so the problems of comparative analysis are compounded. i'm not sure that it's a good starting point to say that much of the fundamental work has to be done in one society, because you don't know what the criteria for relevance are until you have some sense of comparison. if you're doing a case study of one country, you can quickly get enmeshed in the details which may be unique so that they are not general izable. if the specific family alliances among elites, say, in canadian society are completely idiosyncratic and yet have decisively influenced some rather : i critical investment decisions, you may not know that unless you've started out with a comparative framework using the economic consequences of ruling class family networks as your problem. it's a chicken and egg problem to some extent. you don't know what the relevant factors are until you've done the comparative study, but you don't know how to do the comparative study unless you know enough about each case to make the comparison. it depends on the state of knowledge in a particular area as to whether it's better to get the facts straight history of a particular institution or state policy. a lot of groundwork like that certainly has to be done in many areas. on the other hand, it may be better to start out comparatively, if you are able to develop a comparative framework using theoretical guidelines as to what is relevant. this rather important issue of research design underlines the importance of creating a research group where it's possible to have a genuine division of labour, not necessarily collective work but at least a genuine intellectual division of labour on some of these problems. j.c. in the sense of people working on different problems or people working in different areas? r.a. both. i recommend this approach highly. people in france, britain, the united states and canada may be working on pension policy, for example. they get together for an initial conference where they compare notes in a kind of gestalt about the general pattern of the policy making and history of pensions. the process will sensitize them to the dimensions of variability as well as about factors each person is not aware of because some process is absent in their own country. if the research process becomes a quasi-collective division of labour both detailed case studies and systematic comparisons can be done at once in some sense. is i advance that vision of the ideal research process as theoretically desirable but in practice i haven't done any mors comparative work than most other people. but i have been involved in an international group trying to work on urban crises. we want to analyze the differences in the specific structures of the state which deal with these problems. in canada, for example, you could look at the centralization and de-centralization of the state as a rolitical strategy, not as the iron boundaries within which political struggle occurs. the very structure of the state is an object of political and class conflict. j.c. one question that lies behind some of the questions i've already asked concerns r. paper you did on paradigms in political sociology several years ago. in that paper, you appear to simply set out the alternative paradigms without really taking a stand on any of them. in the work you've done since then you do seem to take some position. what i would like you to do is not so much to say that one is better than another (although i want you to do that too) , but rather to state the grounds on the basis of which you would say that you should use one paradigm in preference to another. perhaps you'd have to take all three in any concrete problem. r.a. the essay you refer to was written in 1973 and it certainly did not take a stand on any of them. it attempted to state the assumptions of the class, elite and pluralist paradigms and contrast their distinctive assumptions and power to explain different aspects of social reality. to some extent i would still take that position, i.e. , that there is no adequate general theory. as "paradigms of relations between state and society," in leon lindberg, et al., editors. stress and contradiction in modern capitalism (lexington: lexington books, 1975), pp. 145-160. 16 i said earlier in the interview, marxism has no satisfactory theory of either the state or of democracy and can only with great effort be extended to cover some phenomena. they tend to be regarded as residual or unique features of the "social formation" or of the "conjuncture." i don't object to that mode of theorizing as long as it's clear what limited realms of experience and historical evidence the person who is making that statement realizes they are explaining, that other historical processes and factors remain open for investigation and interpretation. but you're also certainly right that in later writings i come closer to containing what i would now describe as the insights of pluralism within a combination of elite and class perspectives. if i had to describe the nature of a position or a synthesis i would put it that way. the autonomy of groups and the free formation of preferences as in the classic pluralist approach to politics i regard as a useful mode of explanation only within a very narrow range of real political issues. i think there are certain parameters or conditions under which you can describe the outcomes of political conflict using a pluralist model, but those conditions then have to be specified using concepts drawn from essentially a theory which specifies the autonomy of the state structure and the autonomy of the class structure. i realize that's a cryptic statement. you're raising one of the most fundamenta epistemological issues, that is, how (if it is possible) to integrate alternativi paradigms or perspectives. in effect you're asking me to give you a brief and almost glib synthesis, which is a very difficult thing to do, but i will try. first, the requirements of legitimation and accumulation in the capitalist state requires that the state be institutionally separated from the economy, that is the state cannot be under the direct and visible control of the capitalist class for various reasons that the neo-marxists have specified. 17 second, once the state is institutionally separated, it becomes internally differentiated into a politicized and de-politicized sector. this differentiation does not happen in ways which necessarily serve the interests of capital. this is the elite component and it is not the same as either an instrumentalist or a structuralist marxist prediction of the structure. now the pluralist element is that the politicized sectois genuinely open to change brought by the demands of diverse social groups. the political energies of the mobilized groups and parties are absorbed in attempts to influence state decisions largely in the politicized sector of the state. you could call it the sector of pluralist politics, which consumes the political energies of the population in certain kinds of reforms. the issues arour.d which it is possible to mobilize, or to have an impact are quite limited. this interpretation is quite consistent with the whole pluralist position. for example, the whole argument of dahl in who governs? (in different language) is that the impact of political action is limited to the political consensus at any given time, to a quite limited set of issues. now the plural ists do not theorize political consensus: that's their residual category. what accounts for those constraints on the effective range of issues? very briefly, i think both the internal differentiation of the state structure at any given time and the way in which the state is organized in a larger sense to meet certain kinds of requirement for a capitalist economy limit the impact of political mobilization. what i have just given is a structural description , not a prediction of any particular outcomes. i've attempted to state the ways in which each theory (hew haven: yale university press, 1961) 18 locates a particular aspect of reality and explains it with distinctive factors. again, that's only an approach, only a starting point, bat i think it enables one to take into account the incredibly complex and diverse panoply of political actors that get involved in a particular situation, without saying that all the sound and fury of pluralist politics is all of reality, or even the most important part. the other levels still exist at which issues are being decided and benefits allocated. (incidentally, 1 an currently struggling with a book which will expand this argument, with many illustrations from the empirical literature.) j.c. the way you've done it is to go from structures to be analysed in class terms, to the more specific structures of states, such as the segregation of agencies, and finally to the sound and fury of pluralist politics. presumably you car. trace it back then to the effects of pluralist politics on transforming the other levels. r.a. that's precisely right. if you take seriously the idea that the outcomes of the actual issues that emerge into political conflict are not completely determined by the structure of the system, then one can develop a more adequate explanation for the incredibly internally contradictory and fragmented structure of the state and the diverse public policies it produces. j.c. and it would account then for circumstances where it seems that the state is not serving the needs of the capitalist class. r.a. that's correct. this approach argues that if you look at a "cross-section" of the state at any given point in time it will be a reflection simultaneously of the impact of popular mobilization, of working class and other group interests as reflected in various organizations, of the outcomes of the internal strategies of state elites struggling to build bureaucratic empires 19 and of the direct impact of capitalist class interests either mobilized or not mobilized depending on the existing policy of the relevant state agency. because the state depends upon economic growth and tax revenue, it's internal processes are biased (in ways the structuralists have stated) toward the interests of capital. the sum total is a highly internally contradictory apparatus. the implication of this approach is that one cannot and should not leap to quick and easy judgments about the overall function of the state. 87 social mobility: current thrusts (and non-thrusts) a critical approach to the analysis of mobility jan mayer "...the most important thing. ..that we can know about a man is what he takes for granted, and the most elemental and important facts about a society are those that are seldom debated and generally regarded as settled." (louis v.'irth, preface to karl mannheim's ideology and utopia, 1936, xxii, cited in pease, form and rytina, 1970: 127) in the sections which follow, various aspects of mobility research will be examined, beginning in section ii with a orief summary of various approaches which have been taken. the discussion of the sources and functions of social mooility in industrial societies leads to a discussion of the relationship between mobility and industrialization trends, including changes in the occupational structure. the paper ends with a critique of some of the dominant assumptions and lacks of attention in mobility research. the title of the paper indicates a certain skepticism with regard to any progression to date towards shedding light on the "taken for grantedness" of the mobility researcher's world, which encourages a narrow focus on some elements to the exclusion of others. some reasons why this is so are suggested in the concluding section. i introduction: the meaning of mobility the theory of social mobility, goldhaner informs us in the international encyclopedia 0? the social sciences, attempts to account for the frequencies in movements of individuals, families and groups from one social position to another. as moore (1966: 19?) notes, such movements may he in terms of location, relative position, sector or industry, in terms of lateral or occupational moves, or in terms of employer. movements may be intra-generational (career mobility) or intergenerational (change from father's to offspring's status). clearly, some types of mobility will be of more importance than others when such questions as degrees of opportunity or social inequality are raised. the subject of social mobility is an element in the more general study of "social selection"--the distribution of people into positions in social structures, with positions in turn varying in terms of three major "scarce and desirable" social rewards: income (or material goods), prestige, and power. thus, there is a relationship between the stratification system of a society and mobility within it--an "open" class system produces a certain kind and degree of mobility distinct from more closed "estate" systems or nearly rigid caste systems. different mechanisms or processes 88 are said to operate in each type, and these types have a relationship to the type of society—agrarian or industrial, and within industrial, whether "market" (capitalist) or "command" (soviettype) systems. industrialism and its impact on the stratification system and implications for mobility will be examined in section iv. at this point, however, it is important to note a number of general features of social structures which determine forms mobility will take in different societies. smelser and lipset (1966: £-11) identify three such features: (1) "ascription" or "achievement" as the institutionalized basis of legitimation for movement, implying collective and individualistic bases respectively; (2) the degree to which differentiation in the kinship, religious, economic, and political institutions makes for differential status of individuals among the dimensions of wealth, power and prestige (a high degree of formal segregation existing in highly institutionally differentiated social structures making it easier for individuals to move on the basis of a single role); and (3) the locus of control of sanctions ( rewards) --and if in the hands of a few, the degree to which these concentrations coincide in various institutional orders. smelser and lipset (:2) also make the point that economic development (specifically, industrialization) requires more movement, or at least different forms of movement, and that the ease or difficulty of such moveients will depend on the social structure of that society—there is an "emerging tension" between the "demands" of the developing structure and the characteristics of traditional structures. social systems, in their view, have certain "directional tendencies" and certain resources, which are linked by social structure in terms of basic units: roles and social organization (clusters of roles). systems have "functional imperatives" which must be met if systems are to survive: the economic, political, and "integrative" (norms, values, culture) are basic. these imperatives are interrelated, both in terms of interdependence and also in terms of the way in which sanctions produced in one may be used or involved in complex interchanges in another context, to produce other sanctions (e.g. wealth transformed as power, or education as inforration) . thus the stratification system must be seen in terms of roles characterized by different (and differential) receipts of sanctions; roles, organizations, individuals or classes may oe seen as stratified on the basis of these distributions ( :2-7) . to the functionalist, stratification (and hence inequality) is both necessary and inevitable if efficiency and survival of the social system are to be assured. historical and empirical data have at least confirmed the ubiquitousness of stratification. parkin (1973: 49) states that "as a rough general estimate, between a quarter and a third of those born into tne manual working class in modern western countries will move into the ranks of the middle class." —and for most of these, as blau and duncan (ls>67) have found, mobility will involve only short-range changes, such as to low white-collar positions, with the less usual cases, parkin notes, becoming mobile by entry into middle-class professions. 89 mcroberts' (1975) survey of the literature shows that mobility, whether up or down, occurs in sin£le "steps" (i.e. to adjacent categories) ( :7) . lipset and zetterberg (1966: 566; first published 1956), using only the statistically crude comparative tools available at the time, concluded that most western industrial societies revealed roughly the sane "high" rate as the u.s., but perhaps it would be preferable to say "low" (for ooviously, what one regards as evidence of an acceptable rate of mobility will be a normative judgment). (rates of mobility, however, were not related to differences in income inequality^ these findings have been confirmed by more recent comparisons which show that there is little difference in mobility between countries at different levels of economic development, having different normative orientations or class structures (kcroberts, 1975: 7; from muller and kayer, 1973). as for the united states over time, for example, duncan (196?) concludes that the data to the 19oo's tell a "monotonously repetitive story"--no regular increases or decreases in the magnitudes of correlations to be expected if stratification were becoming less rigid since about world war i, that is. no trend either towards increasing or decreasing mobility ( :711) . moreover, hlau an i duncan's (1967: 424) findings indicate that manual workers are less likely than others to achieve an occupational status different from that of their fathers. they identify the three major class divisions in terms of manual/non-raanual and blue-collar/farm as manifested in intergenerational and intragenerational mobility matrices; the lowest white-collar and lowest blue-coliar categories, located just above the class boundaries, apparently serve as channels for upward mobility, while self-employed groups are largely "self-contained" (:422). ii approaches to the study of mobility perhaps the most striking aspect of mobility research over the decades is how little it has progressed. duncan, as cited in the introductory section, concluded that the results of his research were "monotonously repetitive" ; the same could be said about mobility research in general. research has been dominated by the questions "v.'hat factors affect mobility?" and "how 'open' a society is this?" (or more often, "v.'hat is the rate of mobility?"). some different kinds of questions have recently been raised, but as will be shovm in the concluding section, even these have fallen short of the mark in terms of a contriuution to a more encompassing understanding of the mechanisms, consequences, and structural causal roots of lack of mobility, the other side of the coin which comes closer to the heart of questions of inequality, "relative deprivation," and the like. goldhamer highlights one objection to the mobility-measurement enterprise: "...moral and political critiques of society must rest not on distributions of children's status by parents' status., but on the nature of the processes that produce these distributions." (inter! atiokal encyclopedia..; :430) 90 obviously, such questions are not contained within the limits of statistical inference—they r.ust be placed there through theory which guides data-gathering and interpretation, and what is included in theory as relevant depends upon the researcher's bias and the bias of the dominant mode of thinking he accepts. what is absent in the theory will not magically appear in the statistics. duncan (1962) dates the methodological emphasis on measurement from the 1940's with the publication of an article by sibley (1942). up to that time only cooley and sorokin had made some contribution to an understanding of mobility. but even sibley's work had no data on vertical mobility per se , only on net shifts in the occupational structure as presumed evidence for past mobility. sibley's focus was on structural factors—demography, in terms of immigration and differential fertility, and on the educational system as a mechanism facilitating selection of talent and merit. between that time and about 1952, most writers were concerned with the "rigidification" thesis--that the opportunity structure of america had rigidified or that people had "lost the belief" in the possibility of mobility. it was not until natalie kogoff's 1953 study, with its "methodological elegance," that any significant data was brought forward, according to duncan; her finding was that there had been no significant changes in mobility rates between 1910 and 1940. mcroberts (1975: 2-6) defines three main approaches to the study of mobility. these are all approaches at the "macro," societal level, as distinguished from much rarer "micro" approaches such as that of harrison white in chains of offohtui.'ity (1970), in which a mathematically sophisticated "systems" analysis is applied to the mechanisms of mobility within organizational settings involving populations within them. all three "macro" models, the "matrix," "status-attainment," and "life-history" approaches, are essentially mathematical models, relating variables together and searching out statistical associations. the. earlier approach uses a matrix of father's occupation and son's current occupation (father's occupation represented at approximately mid-career by specifying his occupation at the point when the son was 16) ; the matrix describes the amount of mobility in a society intergenerationally. the status-attainment approach goes further. initially developed by blau and duncan (1967), the model introduces the variables of father's education, respondent's education, and respondent's first job on completion of education. it attempts to account for factors which contribute to the transformation of son's origin status into son's present status, but also allows for an examination of the relationship between educational attainment and status attainment independent of origin, through the statistical method of path analysis, which also allows the introduction of other factors thought to be relevant (mcroberts :2-6) . as duncan (1966: 681) explains it: 91 "the rigidity of stratification, in this sense l i.e. intertemporal predictability greater than chance] , is measured by the intergenerational correlation or coefficient of association. . .to be distinguished from the degree of inequality, which refers to the extent of differentiation on a relevant scale of rewards...". the analysis "places" the present generation on an occupational scale relative to placement of the father, but little more. aside from the limitations of the model, a number of methodological problems come to mind: first, the impact of structural change on occupational categories (this is addressed in section iv) ; second, the question of scaling of positions in terms of whether a "step" from one occupation to another always has the same significance (a point raised by goldhamer :430 and also by smelser and lipset, 1966: ib, particularly in terms of the autonomy and social relations connected with jobs) . the elau and duncan model appears to be able to deal with the first but not the second objection. the life-history approach (which kcroberts thinks of not as distinct from but as an extension of the status-attainment model) places its emphasis not so much on inter-generational movement but on the process of intra-generational (career mobility) movements and factors in the opportunity structure (1975: 7). as developed in the later work of hatalie rogoff (now ramsey) in the norwegian occupational life-history study (1974), the focus is on "the socio-economic life cycle of a cohort" and on the distances between groupings in terms not only of societal goods but "bads" (the distribution of negative rewards such as unemployment, illness, work discomforts, and factors usually labelled "quality of life"). ramsey questions "how effective the occupational system is as a transmitter of the rewards involved in the stratification system." (:14), noting that occupational status has been found to account for "relatively little of the variance in income in the united states." ( :15) . the norwegian study found it accounted for only 22$ of the variance in income (:1£). education and occupational status correlated .70 (slightly less than half of the variance), the highest correlation obtained (:19). ramsey also pointed to the possibility in there being a trend towards education bringing a lower monetary return than it did in the past (:22). although she did not raise the question, a relevant concern of research would seem to be the variance unaccounted for—what is there in the structure of industrial (specifically, capitalist) societies which perpetuates inequality and lack of mobility? ill sources and function s of mobility as mentioned in section i, sibley's (1942) analysis of mobility focussed on structural conditions, including the demographic "clues" of immigration, which aided mobility of native americans by injecting a large number of unskilled workers into the bottom end of the labour force, and fertility differentials between the 92 lower and higher occupational clas.-es, which created a surplus at the lower end who could r.ove up the social ladder to fill places left vacant there due to lower rates of reproduction. two other sources of upward mobility sibley identified were continuing technological progress, and the ability of the educational system to outfit people for positions of skill and responsilility. as sibley suspected immigration and differential fertility might eventually be "dwindling sources of upward mobility," he placed great erphasis on the educational system rather than on the effects of technology for upgrading the labour force, since he also noted the appearance of the offsetting effects of unemployment. he saw the future of technological progress as depending on the "ability of the nation's leaders to readjust political-economic institutions so as to produce a genuine 'economy of plenty.'" ( :32 5 ) , thus preventing political unrest and polarization into distinct classes. an important mechanism of stratification is intergenerational transmission of status including not only those parental statuses which influence offsprings' opportunities and orientations, such as parental occupational status ana educational attainment, but also, as duncan (l$t>8: 683) points out, such ascribed statuses as racial, ethnic, cultural, or religious group membership. other factors which affect nobility are inheritance of property, wealth or "intangibles," genetics, socialization, access to opportunities, advantages or handicaps of environment, and something which duncan calls "differential association," which includes items such as assortive mating, which place constraints on the socialization field or act as limits on access to opportunity ( :685) . causes of mobility identified in the literature may be divided into two types—those whicn are structural in nature such as demographic factors and occupational structure as related to industrial development, the creation of vacancies; and those which are "individual" in nature: genetic (intelligence, native ability) conditioned by environment, education, training, motivational factors (aspirations to achieve and to oe mobile), and variational (cultural orientations and belief in mobility as a good end) (see lipset and bendix, 1959; goldhamer; lipset and zetterberg, 1966; blau and duncan, 1967). it can be argued that much of the latter concern constitutes an "individualistic bias" in the literature, inasmuch as it places a great deal of responsibility for success or failure on tne individual rather than on social conditions (as, for example, lipset and bendix' s 1959: 286-7 statement that "the cumulation of disadvantages at th» bottom of the social scale is in large part the result of a lack of interest in educational and occupational achievenents" which cannot be attributed solely to the environment but to individuals' defence mechanisms against psychological burdens of mobility) . by focussing undue attention only on the characteristics of mobile versus non-mobile individuals qua individuals, attention is drawn away from characteristics of social structures and of social groupinrs relative to one another--that is, from the relationship between existing social arrangements and social classes, in the v/eberian and marxian senses. 93 smelser and lipset (1966) argue that "status values" —a "strong concern for social mobility in a society"—will contribute to economic growth because those desiring mobility success "will seek ways to maximize resources" ( :2u). their distinction, cited earlier, between ascriptionand achievement-oriented societies is important here—in societies where enphasis is on ascribed status of people based on kin groupings, "particularistic" rather than "universalistic" standards will tend to prevail, and so impede the workings of meritocratic principles to seek out and elevate talent--principles which are applicable to individuals and not to like groupings. thus, according to these theorists, "this phenomenon of increasing individual nobility appears to be one of the universal consequences of industrialization" ( :12) . blau and duncan (1967: 430) also express a belief that "expanding universalism" (the prevailing of objective criteria of evaluation of individuals over particularistic and subjective bases of evaluations) are causes of mobility, since such criteria become tied to a concern of individuals with materialistic values and hence to an interest in achievement and efficiency. for technological progress and efficiency to continue, the social system has to be such that "the great potential of society's human resources can be more fully exploited in a fluid class structure with a high degree of mobility" ( :43d . hence class lines which restrict mobility are a waste of human talent. the assertion of the democratizing and politically stabilizing effects of industrialization and hence mobility has been expressed by many writers, among them blau and duncan (1967: 439), and also by lipset and bendix (1959) , although the latter also remark that it is a strong belief in mobility, aside from the actual rate, which has the stabilizing influence (:260). lipset and zetterberg (1966: 571) observe that it is strains introduced by thwarted mobility aspirations which predispose individuals towards more extreme political views. they see a consequence of economic development being a potential tension in contradictions between the aristocratic and egalitarian sentiments, where egalitarianism is a characteristic of mature industrial societies. the functions of mobility are also taken up by lipset and bendix (1959: 260-265) in connection with the impact of rapid industrialization creating structural instabilities and disrupting orderly political processes through such factors as conflicts between individual aspirations and kin loyalties, or between emphasis on personal achievement and the management of failure; they speak of the "social and psychic costs" of high rates of mobility. this concern is also expressed by tumin (1970), who views the enphasis of mass societies on mobility strivings and the success ethic as creating: (1) fragmentation of the social order into statuscompeting groups each striving to emulate higher groups and shut out lower ones, (2) a move away from the belief in the dignity of work and work for its own sake to a cynical instrumental use of work as a means to the ends of social and financial success, and (3) a "cult of gratitude" among those who are mobile, blunting social criticism and reinforcing an acceptance of the ''status quo" ( :335-33#) • tumin's overriding concern, however, does not appear to be for individuals or for social classes, but rather for social 9* stability and cohesion of society. tumin's functionalist (and conservative) concern for the social system makes of individuals merely means for the ends of "system needs," it would seem. although blau and duncan (1967: 40?) identified social origins, career preparation, and first job as important conditions for occupational success, they also argued that it is the "basic structural features" of industrial society which are the source of high rates of occupational nobility, and expressed a faith that technological progress would continue to improve chances for upward mobility by making possible the shift from primary and secondary to tertiary industry (especially in professional and semi-professional services) , thus expanding the occupations at the top of the hierarchy, contracting the bottom, and acting as a vehicle for upward mobility ( :426-429) . this is the thesis of the general upgrading of the labour force which many writers have seen as basic to the process of industrialization, and these remarks will thus serve as a suitable introduction to the critical issues raised in the next section. iv industrialization. social structure. amd mobility the assertion of the occupational upgrading of the labour force as a result of advanced industrialism^ and the assertion of the increasing homogenization of class groupings arise from two kinds of social structural analysis which are closely related: the "logic of industrialism" model as exemplified by clark kerr (see goldthorpe, 1966: 649; see ossowski's statement cited in lipset and bendix, 19^9: 281), and the "post-industrial society" thesis as exemplified by daniel bell (see rinehart, 1975: 83-88). both of these approaches have been much criticized for their lack of accord with empirical facts, and they will not be dealt with here. however, they both share the "upgrading" thesis in common and it is this aspect which has important implications for mobility theory. although goldthorpe (1966: 651-3) agrees that in general, industrial societies appear to have higher rates of mobility than non-industrial societies, it does not follow that industrial society is in essence "open" or "meritocratic" or that high rates of mobility are inevitable consequences of technology, increasing specialization and the need for talent expressed in the division of labour. he cites two sources of counter-argument: after kolko and myrdal, goldthorpe argues that levelling in some ranges of the income distribution (as, for example, a swelling of the middle ranks) does not mean more equality, since other trends may be operating—the gap between top and bottom may have remained the same or have widened (indeed there is evidence that in some nations, this latter appears to be the case). moreover, goldthorpe points out, increased inter-generational mobility as indicated by the data may be associated with an actual limitation on intra-gene rational, or career, mobility. lipset and zetterberg (1966: 567) argue that the expansion in whitecollar positions at the expense of manual creates a "surge of upward occupational mobility to the extent that new industrial labour is 95 drawn from farm areas." although they cite a study by bendix which shows a parallel trend in a number of western industrial countries towards an increase in adninistrative employees per 100 production workers since the beginning of this century, they give no evidence to support the argunent that i_n general whitecollar work represents upgrading, or that a move from farm work to industrial manual work represents upward mobility. far from representing upgrading, rinehart {1975: 86) argues that the swelling of white-collar ranks has not occurred at the expense of manual work but at the expense of farm, and that in 1971 the over-whelming majority of white-collar workers (six out of ten in clerical and sales) were engaged in low-level white-collar work, and that within the category "professional and technical," 70$ were semi-professional or technical workers not involved in the complex and challenging "knowledge-work" attributed to them by post-industrial society theorists. moreover, he indicates there is evidence that people are becoming over-educated for their jobs (:#7). an extended argument is made by braverman (1974) for the increasing "deskilling" of much work which previously demanded higher amounts of skill and thought, through the process of subdivision of tasks and the separation of conceptualization from execution of tasks, with control of conceptualization and execution in the hands of high-ranking members of hierarchies or their agents. thus, in effect, much of what may appear to resemble mobility from blue-collar to low-level white-collar and the proliferation of low-level technicians is in actuality a process of "proletarianization" of increasing proportions of the labour force. these arguments would point to a form of downward mobility as more blockages are introduced into the occupational structure, or at minimum, that relative position in terms of class distribution has remained the same despite changes in the nature of work. despite the fond hopes of some of the structural theorists cited here, attempts at measuring structural (occupational) trends also lend support to the interp retation that the progression of industrialism has not resulted in increased mobility—as for example is shown by natalie rogoff's 1953 finding that when changes in the occupational structure were "standardized out", a major factor in mobility changes between 1910 and 1940 was accounted for (cited in koore, 19o6: 1^0). although moore recognizes that skill dilution rather than upgrading is a possibility of structural change ( :197) and that it is not clear why seme white-collar occupations are termed "head" work (such as typists) while some bluecollar' jobs are "hand" work (such as linotypists) (:206), he argues that "it is generally true that occupations commonly classified as non-manual require somewhat higher educational levels and... yield higher incomes." ( :206) . the question of certification through education will be addressed shortly. arguments for upgrading (and hence, sources of mobility) tend to take on a curiously circular cast. occupations which require more education often do so as a result of decisions by employers and may have nothing to do with job content. a listing of occupations in some kind of rank-order says little about differences in authority or job-content between two adjacent categories and may in fact be 96 a reflection of other factors, such as income differentials which may be the result of unionization or its absence. status rankings on which objective rankings are in part based have experienced little change in consensus over the years or from country to country because they are part of the dominant definition of reality. the last point refers to parkin's insight that through socialization into or by dominant-class ideologies, people learn not the placement of every occupation in the scale but rather, "the criteria by which positions are to be ranked. . .certain criteria become institutionalized as 'relevant' fcr ranking purposes, while other criteria are excluded or defined as 'irrelevant'." so that technical expertise, skill, or responsibility are accepted by subordinate classes as relevant fur high prestige, and not physical effort, danger, or dirtiness (1973: 42). if the assertion of occupational upgrading is based upon upgrading in status, and status is a subjective dimension, then a serious point of confusion is introduced into what is purported to be an attempt to measure objective phenomena. since blau and duncan's task was to measure the extent to which a man's occupational achievements depended on occupational status of his father, the question of occupational changes was a crucial one. the issue, as duncan sees it, is "whether occupational status... is sufficiently stable over time as to permit meaningful intertemporal comparisons..." (196?: 70}). duncan's "strong presumptive evidence" of stability was based on income positions and on prestige rankings, and he concluded that the occupational status structure is subject to such snail "random shocks" that changes cumulatevery slowly and have thus not affected the statistics to an appreciable degree ( :709) . it could be argued equally as well, following parkin, that after all, there has been no major overturning of the criteria by which the dominant view accords status, and no major questioning of its legitimacy. the question of whether or not an occupational structure has been "upgraded" cannot be answered by reference to a scale but involves other criteria and other kinds of observations. if upgrading cannot be shown, then one is left only with data which indicates there has at best been no change in the occupational structure, however much it may have changed in other ways, to make any difference to mobility. before proceeding to some general critical comments, it will be in order to discuss one other aspect of the industrialization arguments which pertains to what night be described as "the myth of increasing rationality" and "the myth of increasing universalism." since a highly sophisticated industrial society needs efficiency and rational means for allocating ability, so blau and duncan's argument went, "objective criteria of evaluation that are universally accepted increasingly pervade all spheres of life and displace particularistic standards of diverse ingroups, intuitive judgments, and humanistic values not susceptible to empirical verification." (1967: 429). however, in "strategies of social closure in class formation," parkin (1974) puts forward a different interpretation of the use of universalistic criteria. he distinguishes between two historically distinct ways in which dominant groups exclude others 97 from claims to social rewards: "classes of nomination" are the product of rules of exclusion "that single out the specific attributes of individuals rather than the generalized attributes of social collectivities" (:o) which are the historically older "classes of reproduction." he points out that individualistic rules of exclusion operate within societies dominated by the "liberal ideal." the establishing of universal criteria for evaluating individuals in the form of "credent ialism" is a way of controlling entry to valued positions to those qualified, using eeemingly impersonal means, but universalism is distorted when the "means of credentialism" are monopolized by one social group, and by the transmission of "cultural capital" which introduce "socially inherited handicaps and easements" that are de facto types of collectivist exclusion ana class reproduction ( :7-8) . certain desired social qualities (that is, desired by groups in control of occupational recruitment and selection) come to be more predominant in some groups than others—the nebulous quality of "character" is one such that is sufficiently loose to be used by dominant groups subject to their own definition. there are many such "intangibles"which go into the selection process of potential new elites, for example, by established elites, such that through the recruitment of people "like" tnemselves and through co-optation, existing social arrangements are perpetuated. v critiques of the kceility-measurement enterprise what follows is not a critique of measurement per se , but of the way it has been used, particularly its lack of including any other methods of data-collection. the attempt at making statistical connections usually begins or ends with a nod to social structure and accepts the dominant theories and assumptions about industrial societies as put forward by structuralists who are often functionalists in one guise or another. the fact remains that statistics do not tell a story in ther.selves—they are subject to interpretation and they are only as reliable as the operationalization of variables that went into them. the selection of variables in turn is only-as good as the theory behind them. a number of reasons will be suggested for why this theory may be found lacking. the study of mobility over the years has been largely an enterprise based on variations of the same themes; it has utilized mathematical models of increasing sophistication which have nevertheless been premised on an oversimplified view of the social system, one aspect of which they purport to account for. their variables have been few, their assumptions lacking in tneoretical inclusiveness—many have fallen easily into the "individualistic" trap and have hence been overly psychologistic in their explanations of the sources and mechanisms of mobility; many, often the same, have also fallen into the "logic of industrialism" trap. it is perhaps no accident that the two types of explanation are not unrelated in their minds: that is, the belief in the overriding effect of meritocratic and universalistic principles operating impersonally in the selection system means that the burden of responsibility for mobility is upon the indiviuual, and that if there are any 98 imperfections in the system, "tinkering" with the system to increase equality of opportunity will make the race more fairly run. duncan (196?: 6£>) notes that "from a normative standpoint" one could be concerned with whether the race is fairly run, given the rules, or whether changes should be made in the rules— but the problem with mobility studies is that they rarely get around to explicating the implications of their findings in even the first instance, let alone the second. although some studies (particularly the work of blau and duncan) have noted the differential rates of mobility between the two broad occupational (and societal) groupings centering around the manual/nonmanual "divide," to my knowledge few if any have spent much time on intra-group differences, and none has related these differential rates to dominant class-configurations in society: that is between different categories of manual or of white-collar workers and their differing relationship to the dominant value and resource centres of the society. the one exception is that of elite studies, which have made exhaustive analyses of social origins, career patterns, and mechanisms of exclusion and cohesion which mark off elites from non-elites—but the studies have not been linked to the mainstream of mobility research. it would appear from this lack of connection that the reality of the elite world is not thought to have repercussions for the non-elite world in terms of opportunity structure at lower points on the ladder, in terms of the locus of control and power, and the basis of elite dominance. this is particularly curious considering the concern expressed by elite researchers about the economic and institutional consequences of concentration of power. the notion of dominant and subordinate classes and of the property system around which their relations revolve in capitalist societies have been conspicuously absent in the mobility theoristresearchers' kit of concepts and explanations. it appears not to occur to them that, as parkin (1973: ch. 2) sees it, some degree of mobility in capitalist societies not only assures the infusion of talent when needed but also serves to legitimate the existing set of relations by reinforcing the belief in the rise of merit regardless of origins. both parkin (1973: ch. 1) and anderson (1974: 121-122) criticize the use of the "multidimensional" framework for the analysis of social class common not only to stratification theorists in general, but to those cited here. v/hen wealth, status and power are treated as separate variables with little relationship to one another, or at least, with some disjunctions, attention is drawn away from what is the major societal underpinning in capitalist systems: control of productive property. anderson argues that property classes or ownership must occupy the first and central part of any theory of stratification, as was held by marx and weber, and that from the fact of property other dimensions of stratification can then be examined in proper context. he goes beyond parkin's view that the occupational order is the "backbone" of the class structure and reward system in modern western societies, stating that occupation has always been an important and usually only source of sustenance for the masses; 99 the shift from self-employment to salaried employment is due not to the demise but to the "increasing preponderanc e of property in shaping industrial society" (:122; his err.phasist^ anderson also argues that what is at issue is not the operation of the mobility system but "why such a stepladder society exists in the first place and how and why it is perpetuated." ( :140) . mobility researchers have been obsessed with establishing the rate of mobility, and with the existence of stratification systems almost (if not completely) universally as an important fact—but one may ask whether it is the fact of stratification which is the important concern of research once the fact is established, or whether it ought to be the basis of stratification, its underpinnings, and its meaning. this venture has not gone far enough, and the reason it has not within "mainstream" sociology a; pears due to the limitations imposed by theory and behind that, of an ideological inclination which impedes it. strauss (1971: 1) has concluded that sociological theory is "shot through with rhetoric and ideological commitment" —he has found from an analysis of clusters of images in american stratification literature that the dominant themes of the frontiers as "seedbeds of democracy," the honest workman, the "rugged individualist," the emphasis on personal character, "destiny and civilization" and the "just rewards" of social mobility contained in social theories about industrialization "reflect and are virtually inseparable from their views about social mobility." (:10>). the conviction that americfn stratification literature has been dominated by notions of "evolutionary liberalism" and functionalism has also been expressed by pease, form and rytina (1v70). they trace dominant themes and assumptions in the research to the present, and find that in the postwar period, despite the critique of functionalism and the discovery of some merit in the theories particularly of weber (and to a lesser extent marx), only a perfunctory nod has been made in their direction. social mobility researchers have trivialized weber's work by separating out status from its theoretical brothers; by the 19>0's interest evolved into a concern for "mass middle-class society" with consumption patterns of more importance than income patterns. the authors give three reasons why stratification research seems to have steered clear of hard-hitting issues: the dominant american ideology of individualism which has seeped into sociological theory despite the sociological perspective on "social" explanations for phenomena; the public ideology which conceives of any theoretical debt to i-.arx as implying marxism ; and the struggle of sociology to achieve scientific status, hence its emphasis on improving quantification procedures and choosing variables like status which are easier to operationalize than power (: 132-133). in summary, the sociological enterprise as it is represented in the vast majority of north american stratification and mobility 100 studies is aptly characterized by pease, form and rytina thus: "sociologists who view stratification as a matter of individual occurrences rather than social structure, who study consumption to the neglect of distribution and production, who study the labor market but not the credit and commodity markets, who emphasize status, oversimplify class, neglect wealth, define power as being outside stratification, and who fail to see 'race relations,' minority status, and poverty in the context of stratification confirm robert lynd's observation that when it ccmes to matters of class stratification, 'the social sciences tiptoe evasively around the problem' ." ( :134) . 101 bibli ography anderson, charles h., the political economy of social class, 1974 englewood cliffs, n.j.: prentice-hall blau, peter h. , duncan, otis dudley, the american occupational 1967 structure, new york: john v/iley &. sons brave rman, harry, labor and monopoly capital, new york and london: 1974 monthly review press duncan, otis dudley, "problems in the measurement of trend," in 1968 e. b. sheldon and w. e. moore (eds.), indicators of social change, new york: russell sage foundation goldhamer, herbert, "social mobility," international encyclopedia of the social sciences goldthorpe, john h., "social stratification in industrial society," 1966 in reinhard bendix and seymour martin lipset (eds.) class, status and fower, new york: the free press lipset, seymour martin; bendix, reinhard, social mobility in 1959 industrial society, berkeley and los angeles: university of california press lipset, seymour martin; zetterberg, hans l., "a theory of social 1966 mobility," in bendix and lipset (eds.) class, status and pov.'er, new york: the free press mcroberts, hugh a., social stratification in canada: a prelimin1975 ary analysis, doctoral dissertation, carleton university moore, wilbert e., "changes in occupational structures," in smelser 1966 and lipset, (eds.) social structure and mobility in economic development, chicago: aldine parkin, frank, "strategies of social closure in class formation," 1974 in parkin (ed,), the social analysis of class structure, london: tavistock , class inequality and political order, paladin (u.k.) t973 pease, john; form, william h.; rytina, joan huber, "ideological 1970 currents in american stratification literature," the american sociologist (may), pp. 127-137 ramsey, natalie rogoff, "social equality in the here and now," 1974 institute of applied social research, oslo raimeo rinehart, james w., the tyranny of work, don mills: longman canada 1975 102 sibley, elbridge, "some demographic clues to stratification," 1942 american sociological review, vol. 7, pp. 322-330 smelser, neil j.; lipset, seymour kartin, "social structure, 1966 mobility and development," in smelser and lipset (eds.), social structure and mobility in economic development, chicago; aldine strauss, anselra, the contexts of social mobility, chicago: 1971 aldine tuilin, melvin m. , "some unapplauded consequences of social mobility 1970 in a mass society," in tumin (ed.), readings on social stratification, englewood cliffs, n.j.: prentice-hall socialist feminist theory: the issue of revolution eileen saunders this paper explains the reproduction of sexual inequality in socialist systems with the argument that an emancipated role for women is strategic during the phase of revolutionary mobilisation but, given the productive priorities of the new state, equality will be downplayed during the period of consolidation. the case of china is used to illustrate the tension between female productive and reproductive roles and to support the argument -hat, since revolution is an engineered process, female status is partially determined by the priorities of the engineer . introduction socialist feminists are beginning to arrive at some common understanding of the role of women under capitalism, at least at a general level of analysis. we agree that we must focus on the interconnections between patriarchal relations and the historicallysituated interests of capitalism, supporting our arguments with research detailing the relationship between the exigencies of evolving capitalism and the socio-political position of women. the position, however, on the relationship of women to socialism is less clear. while juliet mitchell was calling for the "articulation" of our relationship to socialism over a decade ago, our response has been uneven, at times contradictory, and, above all, limited at the theoretical level. as with the proverbial donkey, we dangle the carrot of socialist revolution in front of our collective noses, with the implicit knowledge that its consumption may alleviate the hunger without eliminating it. we know that which we negate, but are not as sure of that which we affirm. but, that said, we still fall back on a precarious "after-the-revolut ion-trust" fweinbaum, 1978:8) . accordingly, confronted by feminists who point to existing sexual inequalities in various contemporary socialist states, the response, though varied, contains one unifying theme, the attempt to 'explain avey' the inequalities. this occurs in several ways: ch the one hand, there are those who would deny that inequality persists in socialism, citing bourgeois propaganda, liberal distortions, and north american ethnocentric standards as the sources of such conclusions. essentially, they argue that female emancipation can be demonstrated through a comparison of pre-social ist and socialist female status. oi the other hand, there are those who would argue that 62 persisting inequality is a consequence of cultural lag, the remnants of a feudal tradition which will eventually disappear. finally, a similar strand focuses on technological underdevelopment, arguing that full emancipation must await sufficient development in the forces of production. wiile obviously different in terms of their focus of analysis, each category of response assumes a processual transition from the pre-revolutionary period through to the post-revolutionary period. in other words, there is an implicit acceptance of the linear rationality of socialist revolution; namely, that ideology of women's role developed during the concrete revolutionary process is a pre-figurative version of the post-revolutionary regime's policy toward the role of women in the 'new' society. underlying this assumption is an expectation of gradual elevation in female socio-political status as the socialist regime extends its control over the entire society. if the expectation remains unrealized, we are locked into either examining the prefigurative version (i.e. where did engels go wrong?) or arguing that the transitional process has not fully evolved (i.e. give us another ten years to get the 'kinks' worked out) . essentially, the motivation for this paper lies in a dissatisfaction with the socialist feminist response to the feminist dismissal of socialism. what appears to have happened is that socialist feminists have felt we must either deny the 'accusations' or argue for patience in the face of impending cultural/economic development for the 'accused' regime. wiat i would argue is that neither approach sheds light on the role of women within a socialist revolution, lb deny the reality of the phenomenon is as meaningless as to apologize for history by promising a better future. 63 the real theoretical problems are to account for the context of the participation of women relative to men, and to articulate the mechanisms of change . female emancipation under socialism is not an all-or-nothing phenomenon; it is a process which has taken on different dimensions in different historical periods. it is precisely this fluctuating nature of progress and retrenchment in women's issues under socialist revolution which must be explained, lb accomplish this, one must look at the historical process involved in the development of socialist revolution. in other words, we must use history to determine the mechanisms of change, not merely to "compare the present to the past and see progress" (sidel, 1974:123). a starting point in this task is to treat as problematic the assumption of a processual transition from prerevolutionary ideology to post-revolutionary praxis. in other words, i will begin by treating as analytically separate the period of revolutionary insurgency and the period of post-revolutionary consolidation of power. the problem is to examine the interaction of the revolutionary party/state exigencies in each period and policies concerning the productive and reproductive roles that women play in each period, d] hopefully this approach will avoid the error of treating ideology as determining praxis, by arguing that historical material realities necessitate a praxis which may have little to do with the ideology of liberation. in the following, i will attempt to suggest how one can proceed to investigate the interaction of socialist revolutionary requisites and policies regarding women, and how one can use the 'model' to make sense of certain developments in the chinese revolution. 64 revolution: the process and the product as suggested in the introduction, the analysis of socialist revolutions must take account of two distinct phases: the process of attempting seizure of the incumbent state apparatus; and the process of consolidation of the new state apparatus (in marx's terms, the insertion of a 'dictatorship of the proletariat') . [2] the problem is that there is a void within marxism in terms of a political theory which addresses either process in any detail (see miliband, 1977 and boggs, 1977) . although there is a general framework with which to approach the issue of socialist revolution and transition (i.e. the notion of a proletariat achieving self-anancipation with the aid of an organizing party) , the problem of how, and the problem of transition to a new stage was never fully worked out by marx. the emphasis on the historical inevitability of the transition has subordinated the question of how a revolutionary movement actually brings about the process. this problem becomes even more acute when an industrial proletariat is either weak or non-existent, and when capitalism is at an early stage of development (and often inserted from outside) . the general framework, as mapped by marx and engels and modified by lenin, seems even more remote in these cases, cases which become important vshen one looks at the growth of socialist movements in the third wbrld. the fundamental question becomes: how does a revolutionary socialist movement build socialism under those conditions? in other words, what is required of the organizing revolutionary party? and , how can those requisites affect policy toward women? i turn first to the process of seizure of power. 65 a. phase of insurgency lb begin, one can isolate two clear tasks of a revolutionary party at this stage. first, the movement, through the direction of the party, must seize effective control of the state apparatus from the incumbent elite. thus, through force , the movement can remove a regime from power. this is essentially a military question concerning the strategic mobilization and deployment of armed forces. i am not concerned with the relation of this task to the role of women, other than to point out the necessity of replacing labour power displaced by military mobilization. second, the movement, through the direction of the party, must destroy loyalties to the old regime. this task is essentially a question of dealing with the impact of traditionalism, an obstacle which cannot be dealt with by force alone. as mliband (1977:47,50) argues, it involves a "battle for consciousness": the problem, for victorious revolutions, is to prevent tradition from corroding them and ultimately defeating them from within. . .traditions are sustained and mediated by a network of particular institutions, which are actively involved in the performance of a process of transmission. it is in terns of this task that the relationship of women to revolutionary goals may be understood. what role do women play in the 'institutions of tradition' and how may a revolutionary party overcome this obstacle? a significant contribution can be made to this set of questions by drawing upon the work of gregory massell (1974). massell's intention was to study a ' revolution-from-above' in this case, the soviet union's extension into central asia (between 1919-1929), with the following questions in mind : ...how and to what extent, political power may be deliberately used in the revolutionary transformation of societies, especially those we call 'traditional' societies; conversely, how, and to what extent, traditional structures and life styles may serve as obstacles to engineered revolution, (p.xx) 66 the problems faced by the soviets in central asia were typical of traditional society: no industrial proletariat to speak of and the minimal presence of a capitalist mode of production. massell (75, 76) argues that their solutions essentially broke down into two possible responses: on the one hand, the use of force to 'excise' the traditional elites and coerce the population into compliance and, on the other, the discovery of "a weak link in society, a relatively deprived and hence potentially subversive stratum susceptible to militant appeal, a surrogate proletariat where no proletariat in the real marxist sense existed". both responses were used by the soviets in central asia, but what is interesting for the issues at hand is their perception of the weak link and its strategic contribution to the subversion of traditionalism. through an analysis of soviet documents, massell (76) demonstrates that women in these traditional moslem societies were defined as "crucial actors" whose mobilization would severely weaken the key institutions. this plan of action obviously assumes that class position was not the sole basis for expression of social conflict; rather, patriarchy vested in a range of authority relations was a key element (87-88) . chce the decision to mobilize women was taken, the task of the revolutionary party became to "maximize female discontent" and "channel" it into directions optimal to the revolutionary movement (massell, 1974:131-132). the source of the discontent was fairly clear; a quick scan of female status in traditional moslem societies gave clues as to the potential tension inherent in their roles. thus, the 'payoffs' for women in mobilization were the wide range of citizen rights not 67 previously open to them (ranging from rights to education to protection from sentence of death for illegitimate loss of virginity) . the payoffs for the revolutionary movement were not as obvious. the links between the mobilization of women and the demise of traditionalism were more implicit than explicit. this is exactly where the significance of tessell's argument to the issues raised at the beginning of this paper emerges. he articulates those linkages by demonstrating the expectations the soviets expressed through their policies and action regarding women. his analysis illustrates the leverage gained by the soviet state through the strategic use of women to destabilize the traditional regime. briefly summarized, the "payoffs of female mobilization" are (133-181): 1. liberation and humanitarian implications: the moral legitimation of the soviet movement on humanitarian grounds become an important rallying point for both appeals to foslem women (who gained personal benefits) and for the recruitment of cadres to work for the cause. 2. implications for traditional authority relations: the role network links between authority, kinship, lineage and male superiority become vulnerable when the political cohesion afforded through the female role is removed. 3. implications for kinship and community: the increased opportunities to women, the liberalization of divorce, and the stress on public participation subordinates local traditional loyalties based on clan, family and custom ties. in addition, the disruption of kinship control over sex and marriage strengthens loyalties to the new regime among women and young people. to undercut primary social units and induce 'fragmentation' makes individuals more accessible to mobilization and the society more open to penetration. 4. implications for religion and custom: to challenge the legitimacy of religious control over daily life through the subversion of islamic custom regarding women is a key to weakening the overall control of these religious institutions and their elites. 68 5. implications for property relations: the importance of the links between customs involving the female role and certain 'institutions of property* (arranged marriage, bride-price, etc.) suggests that mobil izat ion of women can weaken patterns of property controlthis is compounded with challenge to lack of control over property, including land. moreover, the new accessibility of poor males to marriage increases the latter' s attraction for the new regime. 6. implications for recruitment of labour and technical cadres: the mobilization of women involves the provision of a large, previously untapped labour pool which increases the scope of economic development and the optimal productive potential of the society. 7. implications for recruitment of political cadres: the recruitment of indigenous cadres through appeals to moslem women is useful not only in expanding party influence but also in their serving as prefigurative models of the role of women in the new society. 8. implications for revolutionary potentials abroad: this theme, more historically tied to the nature of the soviet 'satellite' system, involves the expectation that the ofttern set for women in central asia could serve as a revolutionary model for societies on its borders. the importance of massell's analysis to socialist feminists lies in his focus on the strategic use of feminist issues both to weaken the traditional regime and to strengthen loyalties to the emerging regime. again, this is not to say that 'liberation' motives played no part in their policies on women, only that these were secondary to the priorities of gaining a foothold in the society. this fact becomes even more apparent when massell documents the retrenchment and, even, reversals in policies of mobilization within two and one half years of their origin (1974:322-389). however, it is concerning the problem of explaining the retrenchment that i think massell fails. he notes that the "imperatives of insurgency are not easily reconciled with imperatives of incumbency" 69 (1974:407-408) but, when faced with the elaboration of the latter imperatives, he falls back on the idealist argument that the threat posed by radical policies of liberation to male identity , vested in tradition, created a situation of tension which was unhealthy for a regime seeking stabilization. wiile one cannot ignore this dimension of resistance, to give it causal status is, i think, misleading. it obscures the question of what set of conditions emerges when a revolutionary party is transformed into a legitimate state apparatus. it is necessary to specify the conditions under which the 'payoffs' became too costly. to do that one needs to question the role of the state in socialism, its tasks, and how they interact with the role of women in the new regime. in other words, is the new regime forced to retrench its position on women (for reasons of resistance, cultural lag or whatever) or, are there payoffs to the socialist state for retaining or reproducing particular elements of patriarchal relations? b. phase of consolidation/development as i discussed earlier, there is a lack of analysis by marxists of the role of the state in socialism. the explanation of the socialist state apparatus cannot be found, though, by merely equating the state's role in capitalist and socialist states as some convergence theorists would seek to do. the conditions within which the state operates cannot be ignored. collective ownership of the means of production and the absence of an appropriating class cannot help but have an effect on the concrete operations of the socialist state. vfriat then can one say of the requisites the socialist party faces at this phase? on a general level, what is required is the replacement 70 of the seized state apparatus with a new organ of planning and control and the replacement of engineered separation from old regime loyalties with popular support and loyalty to the new regime. moreover, it is important to recognize the broad constraints on the state in terms of its ability to meet those requisites. ch this point, miliband's discussion of the 'functions' of a state is incisive. essentially, he argues that every state must carry out the following functions, although the conditions of doing so will vary (1977:90): 1. the repressive function (the state must maintain social order within its boundaries) 2. the idealogical-cultural function (the state must engineer and maintain consent to the form of the system) 3. the economic function (used in the broadest sense, the state must sustain the population and foster productive growth) 4. the international function (the state must foster and protect the 'national* interest in international matters) the important question is how the 'nature' of socialism affects the role of the state in carrying out these functions. while it is fairly clear how the capitalist state operates as a class instrument (although we may debate its degree of autonomy) in the performance of these functions, the matter is complicated in the analysis of socialism by its economic context. as miliband (1977:114, my emphasis) notes: . . .the collectivist character of the society precludes it from being such an instrument .. .instead, the state may be taken to 'represent' the collective society or system itself, and to have as its function the service of its needs as these are perceived and defined by those who control the state . the role of the party/state (in socialism the terms are realistically interchangeable in terms of actual control) is, then, to define needs and the strategy for dealing with them. this is not to suggest that the state becomes an instrument for bureaucratic class 71 privilege although one cannot deny that privilege can accrue in this manner. rather, the state is still constrained by the "rationality of state action" in a socialist context; i.e. "statefostered economic growth... and statefostered provision of social services and cultural developments" (miliband, 1977:113-114). but, a factor which _is significant is the degree of power wielded by the apex of the socialist state in the interpretation of needs and allocation of resources to meet them. this does not imply a purposeful conspiracy of those individuals who hold the reins of state power but it does recognize the place of the state in intersecting historical material conditions through planning direction and implementing policy . certainly, one must recognize the genuine role of mass parties in socialist states, but these are parties which are "distinguished by their pyramidal structures, with an extreme concentration of power at the top of the pyramid" (miliband, 1977:115). lb return to the issue of women in this process of consolidation and development: the above discussion focuses attention on the interplay of the historically situated material conditions which socialist regimes inherit; the role of the state in intersecting the material conditions and the necessity of growth and provision of services; and the policies regarding women in the consolidation of socialism as a reflection of the conditions proceeding from the first two factors rather than from a prefigurative ideology or their role in the insurgency phase. my argument is that to talk about women's relationship to socialism is a complex matter. it requires that we first look at the conditions of taking power , its requisites and the strategic role women can play, and, secondly, look at the conditions of replacing and consolidating power , its requisites and the strategic role women can 72 play. this mode of analysis does not assume the party/state as an a_ priori monolith. quite the opposite. it suggests, to rework an old marxist adage, that socialist parties/states make history, but not under conditions of their own choosing. in other words, socialist ideology concerning women does not necessarily transform into socialist praxis towards women. case application: china i have been attempting to suggest that a focus on the stages or phases in the building of socialism in traditional societies and on their parallel requisites can lead to a better understanding of the unfulfilled promise of socialism for women. i would now like to suggest how one might make sense of particular developments in china with respect to policies regarding women. cbviously, in a paper of this scope, i cannot mount a full historical analysis of the role of women in china from the prerevolutionary period through the present. what i will attempt is a selective discussion of the broad policies of the chinese communist party (c.c.p.) relevant to the role of women. i will focus specifically on the phase of insurgency and the phase of consolidation/development. a. the phase of insurgency keeping in mind the two periods of alliance between the c.c.p. and the guomindang nationalist party (1923-27 and 1938-45), the important periods of insurgency are 1927-37 and 1945-49. tne period of 1927-33 is important as the time during which the initial collectivist soviets were established as rural bases in central and southeast china. they are especially important as a 'testing ground' for development of party policies regarding women, policies later expanded in the liberated 73 areas of northern china following the long march of 1934. mule there are many policies of significance in the insurgency period, those regarding marriage are of particular relevance. i will focus on these policies, and also make brief reference to labour and land policies. two key marriage policies in the insurgency period are the ferriage regulations (1931) and the marriage law (1934). t3] both policies contained an emphasis on: 1) freedom of choice in marriage by individuals involved 2) freedom of choice in divorce by individuals involved 3) registration of marriage and divorce with local party officials 4) responsibility of the male in divorce action to provide for wife and children (the latter remaining in custody of wife) the law of 1934 seems to have taken a qual ifed stand on divorce. [4] the restrictions placed on women who were seeking divorce from males serving in the red army are particularly interesting since such a suit required the husband's consent. as croll notes, several documents appeared during this period viiich stressed the difference between freedom and 'absolute' freedom in marriage and divorce. this was, apparently, a response to negative reaction to the law (1978:195) on the part of peasants. vrtiile recognizing that the implementation of the law was uneven, what can we say about its links to revolutionary goals at large? following is a brief summary of what i think are some of the important linkages: (i) the c.c.p. policies on marriage most certainly reflected liberation and humanitarian themes. their recognition of the impact of such practices as marriage, bride-price and widow suicide on women as individuals became an important inducement for the feminist organizations in china at that time to join with the communist cause. 74 (for discussion of this engineered alliance, see croll, 1978:117-152). (ii) the impact of the marriage law on traditional authority relations is particularly significant in china where a women was subject to three authorities in her lifetime: that of her father, her husband, and her son. the granting of unprecedented female rights disrupted that entire role network. with respect to the attack on an arranged marriage system, the law significantly affected the practice of the land-holding classes to use marriage as a mechanism for social mobility (see wolf, 1969:107). the disruption of traditional authority is particularly evident with respect to the role of confucian ideology in sustaining a hierarchy of authority. at the root of the confucian system of 'proper relations' was the notion of patriarchy, vested in the dominance of the male 'yang' over the female 'yin.* indeed, to challenge the legitimacy of this domination was to challenge the whole confucian system of authority relations. (iii) the granting of equal rights to women in marriage and divorce seriously undermined the control of the kinship system over such processes. in so doing, it undermined a crucial link between the peasants and the ruling class; namely, the clan system. as barrington moore notes (1966:207), peasant conservatism in feudal china can largely be explained through the extended kin groups, the clan. it was the one binding link between ruled and ruler and it was determined by patrilineal descent. to 'equalize' women as partners in a freely-chosen marital arrangement (including the retention of maiden name) is a direct challenge to the lineage system and the control exercised by the clan. this is even more significant when the locus of 'approval' is transferred to the c.c.p. through registration of marriage and divorce. the local officials had significant discretion in the recognition of 75 such arrangements. also important is the fact that it was the middle and upper class members of a clan who really controlled the clan itself, generally because of the importance accorded to literacy as a requisite of political poter (wblf, 1966:108-109). thus, the undermining and subordination of clan authority to party control was a blow against class authority as well. in this manner, radical reform in marriage custom provided important leverage for the c.c.p. in breaking the strong clan ties, ties which often encompassed entire villages. in addition, the new accessibility of the sexes encouraged the loyalty of poor male peasants (known as 'bare sticks') vho previously could not afford brides, and of young people in general. (iv) the impact of the marriage law on religious tradition is important with respect to the place of confucian ideology in sustaining traditional authority, as discussed above. not only did the law i challenge the legitimacy of confucian beliefs and values in relation to i women, it extended the challenge to the fundamental axis of filial duty j and to ancestoral worship (again based on patrilineal descent). (v) the links between the marriage law and property relations are quite clear. the former fundamentally challenged the tradition of females as property to be used and disposed of at will by father or husband. in outlawing arranged marriage and bride-price, it took away significant control from fathers. in liberalizing divorce, it eroded the control of husbands over their wives. in both cases, it increased the accessibility of women to the revolutionary movement, a significant consequence vhen a party is seeking the quick mobilization of individuals for revolutionary tasks. in addition to marriage policies, the linkages of land and labour 76 , reform policies to female mobilization are significant. the land reform laws[5] formulated during the period of the early soviets, withdrawn during the 2nd lhited front and expanded during the civil war period, contained one important theme, the equal right of all individuals to land allotments, and went so far as to issue separate deeds to husband and wife to specify the share of each. the impact of this law was clear in one respect. redistribution of land on an individual basis rather than on a family unit basis broke the village network apart at its base by undermining the crucial link between property and kinship and forging a new link between the individual and the c.c.p. thus, while c.c.p. documents of this time contain explicit reference to the equation of land reform and female liberation (see eavin, 1976:26-27) the more obvious consequence was the subversion of the traditional property network. this becomes clearer when one notes the refusal of the c.c.p. to extend allotments to all 'landless' women. class position of the husband was a determinate boundary. policies regarding the labour of women in the insurgency phase contained one dominant aim: the mobilization of women for the war effort. in a society dependent upon labour-intensive agriculture for subsistence, the ability to recruit military forces was directly tied to the ability to provide for the dependents left behind. tack of financial resources for 'welfare support' leaves but one choice, to replace the lost labour power. this was the primary role of chinese women in the revolutionary process, engaging in support activities for the red army. they were not recruited into combat activity. we know, for example, that only fifty women went along on the long march of 50,000 (salaff and terkle, 1970:82). in contributions other than agricultural labour, their tasks were 77 consistently of a domestic nature. this selectivity of participation was reflected in the issues dealt with by the women's congresses of this period. davin summarizes the major subjects of debate of the 1933 women's district congress as: enlarging and giving aid to the red army, caring for dependents of the latter, learning to plough, and selling personal valuables to finance the movement (1976:26). issues such as literacy, health care, footbinding, and feudal marriage were relatively ignored by these 'ffminist' organizations in the pursuit of the party priorities. for those feminists, like ding ling in 1941, who protested the subordination of these questions, the party response was that sexual liberation was already established and further feminist action was harmful to the cause (see davin, 1976:36). apparently, the strategic use of women had its limitations, imposed by party priorities. trie general labour law of this period, modelled after the soviet union labour code, did not have much impact on women's labour due to its emphasis on industrial workers, a significant minority in the liberated areas. it _i£ significant as a prefigurative version of protective legislation restricting women's labour, limiting certain industries, night work, and 'heavy' labour (see croll 1978:263-264 and davin 1976:31). also included was a policy to arrange day care services at the female's place of employment so that she might better organize her dual responsibilities. the above discussion provides, i think, some clues as to the relationship of women and revolutionary requisites in the insurgency phases in china. certainly, there were payoffs for chinese women and to ignore this fact is to do a gross injustice to the real successes of the revolution. trie equally interesting question, however, is the degree to which these payoffs were in keeping with party requisites in seizing 78 power and combatting traditionalism. the admittedly brief summary of certain policies and their links to revolutionary goals seems to suggest that feminism had its value, but only to a point. the retrenchment in divorce during the civil war, the emphasis on the war effort over particular female-specific reforms, the segregation of women from active military participation, and the extension of domestic-type tasks indicate some of the boundaries of patriarchy that the party was not willing to cross. b. the phase of consolidation/development as elaborated earlier, the essential requisites of the socialist state in this phase are the fostering of economic growth and the provision of necessary services to the population. these are carried out under the restraints of particular material conditions which the state intersects through the implementation of policies defined as necessary by those in control of 'problem perception 1 . to understand the role of women in the chinese socialist state, one must first examine the conditions under which policies regarding their role emerged. again, there is a significant body of literature addressing various developments in post-revolutionary china which time does not permit me to pursue here. rather, i will attempt to summarize what seem to have been the major shifts in policy regarding women. i will restrict the time period in question to 1953-1960, for reasons involving the 'statistical blackout' of 1961 and policy shifts and factional struggles in china since 1960 which reflect the competing models (the "two roads to socialism") which emerged in the first decade. two quite different approaches to economic development emerged in china following the demise of the new democratic period in 1953 and the 79 break with a capital isr mode of production. the first was a soviet-modelled, urban-oriented and capital-intensive strategy, the first five year plan (1953-1957). the second model was really mao zedong's version of a dual approach to economic development, the great leap forward (1958-196c) . based on mass mobilization of labour power, it stressed the simult< neous development of small-scale and large-scale industry, employing labour-intensive means in the former and capital-intensive means in the latter. these alternative strategies for promoting growth led to differing and sometimes contradictory policies on women. 1. the first five year plan the problems facing post-war china were severe: a fragmented, war-torn economy, a weak industrial base, technological backwardness and low labour productivity in agriculture, and a population of about five hundred million (see eckstein et al., 1968). with soviet guidance and support, the c.c.p. attempted a massive industrial drive by increasing the state capital investment by sixty percent by 1956, by sharply increasing industrial output, and by creating a massive in-flow to urban areas ;see yeh, 1968). the difficulties contained in this approach were the inordinate share of fixed investment in heavy industry, about eighty-six percent in the 53-57 period according to cheng (1974:55), and stabilization of the agricultural sector at low growth levels. the impact of these conditions on women was a significant retrenchment of previous policies. during the contraction of the urban market in 1955-1957, the "whole apparatus of persuasion and propaganda was mobilized to keep women out of the labour force" (howe, 1971:97). it was also in 1955 that davin notes a significant increase in women's 30 organizations known as dependents' associations, groups whose purpose was to encourage the participation of women, not as productive workers, but as wives and mothers (1976:59-61). an additional consequence of the focus on heavy industry was a decline in the state's investment in consumer goods to about nine percent of total investment (cheng, 1974:55). as weinbaum argues, the slack led to inflated consumer prices and thus to higher wage demands by state workers, lb deflect rising wage costs, the state encouraged women to engage in domestic production of consumer goods for use (weinbaum, 1976:42-43). again, women's organizations played an important role in implementing this policy. indeed, the slogan of the women's congress of 1957 became "build up the country economically; manage the household thriftily; and struggle for socialist construction" (davin, 1976:65). finally, family solidarity was an important theme in this period and divorce became increasingly difficult to obtain (see kristeva, 1975:65). the overall thrust was a resurgence in traditional female roles (including arranged marriage) during the period of urban-centered industrial expansion. by the end of the plan, industrial growth was impressive, but it was not in any way matched by growth in agriculture. intersectoral imbalances led to raw material shortages, supply bottlenecks and inadequate consumer goods provision (eckstein et al . , 1968:6). it was in the context of these conditions that the leap policy was implemented. the problem they faced was that of maintaining industrial growth in addition to fostering agricultural growth. 2. the great leap forward mao's solution, that of 'walking on two legs' was the 81 simultaneous development of agriculture and industry, heavy and light industry, and modern and traditional technology (hou, 1968:379). in a context of scarce capital, the state's solution was to use capital-intensive means in heavy industry and substitute labour for capital in other development (hou, 1968:381). the impact on the policies regarding women was clear. mass mobilization of labour power for socialist development demanded the large scale entrance of women into production. vt\at is interesting, however, is the context of their entrance. in rural areas, where male cadres significantly controlled the production process, women were overwhelmingly represented in seasonal labour and in sectors of traditional technological organization such as irrigation, reclamation and flood-control (see andors, 1976:91 and hou, 1968). in urban areas there were several consequences of significance. first, between 1958 and 1960, the state set up a state-controlled sector of urban commune cr 'street' industry. this sector employed a total of two million workers, of whom eighty-five percent were women (hou, 1968:381). organized for small-scale production of consumer goods, this sector allowed several advantages: it alleviated the state's need for consumer goods production given its low rate of investment; it brought private supplementary income into the household, lowering the necessary wage bill to the state, and, finally, it was a means of absorbing a large supply of labour in the urban area (weinbaum, 1977:43). in addition, a sectoral division of labour by sex tended to peripheral ize women into either service sectors or the traditionally organized , low investment sectors of industry (see hou, 1968) . finally, in 1959 the birth control campaign of earlier periods was halted (hou, 1968:383). apparently the strategy of using labour as 82 a primary form of capital implies a renewed emphasis on the role of women as reproducers. unfortunately, the state expected women to serve both productive and reproductive roles with no compensation and little service support for the latter. the leap period was a dismal failure for several reasons, not the least of which were a variety of natural disasters. in the years to follow, what occurred was really a power struggle concerning approaches to development. while right-wing strategists controlled the state, a reversion to social conservatism and material incentives was accompanied by a retrenchment in the role of women, including the revival of feudal customs such as bride-price in certain areas (£ndors, 1976:94). when mao regained control, a re-anphasis on leap strategies led to policies on women similar to those of 1958-60. while historical conditions obviously differed, the real patterns for fluctuating state policies on women in socialism stem from the first decade of chinese development. while an in-depth historical treatment of these periods is required to fully explore the role of the state and its manipulation of female status, i think the above discussion is suggestive of the linkages. essentially, it indicates that women are used to 'absorb 1 the costs of production in socialism. i emphasize that the tenor of this analysis is not to suggest that socialist revolution is, therefore, a dead-end for socialist feminists. certainly in china, the position of women has progressed remarkably relative to pre-revolutionary conditions. what i am suggesting is that there have also been blocks in that process toward liberation, blocks which do not seem to wither away with time or technology. the task seems to be that of articulating the process of revolution, the process of transition to socialism, and above all, our place in these processes. glib references to historical 83 inevitability can only bind us to a naive faith in the historical ocnent. ultimately, it is necessary to realize that revolution is an engineered process and, consequently, that female status is partially determined by the priorities of the engineer. notes fl] the distinction as employed here refers to the type and organization of labour performed. 'productive' refers to labour performed in the public sphere and 'reproductive' refers to labour (including actual reproduction) performed in the private sphere of the family unit. [2] it is perhaps important to note at this point that i am not concerned in this paper with the issue of conditions leading to socialist revolution in the pre-revolutionary period. rather, i am interested in the point at which the revolutionary movement is already in progress and, subsequent to success, is transformed into a socialist regime. [3] documents available in english in meijer (1972). [4] for extended discussion, see croll (1978:194-196) or davin (1976:28-29). [5] for extended discussion, see wong (1973) and hsiao (1969). hsiao also contains english translations of documents. references andors, phyllis 1976 "politics of chinese development: the case of women, 1960-1966", signs , 2(1):89-119. boggs, carl 1977 "revolutionary process, political strategy, and the dilemma of power", theory and society , 4(3) :359-393. cheng , chu-yuan 1974 china's allocation of fixed capital investment, 1952-1957 . ann arbor: michigan papers in chinese studies, no. 17. croll, elizabeth 1978 feminism and socialism in china . london: routledge and keagan pau! 84 davin, delia 1976 women work . oxford: clarendon press. eckstein, a. 1968 economic trends in communist china . w. galenson and ta-chung liu (eds.) , edinburgh: edinburgh university press. hou, chi-ming 1968 "manpower, employment and unemployment", economic trends in communist china , a. eckstein, w. galenson and t. liu (eds.) , edinburgh: university of edinburgh press. howe, christopher 1971 employment and economic growth in urban china: 1949-1957 . cambridge: cambridge university press. howe, christopher 1973 wage patterns and wage policy in modern china: 1919-1972 . cambridge: cambridge university press. hsiao, tso-liang 1969 the hand revolution in china, 1930-1934: a study of documents. seattle: university of washington press. kristeva, j. 1975 "ch the women of china", signs , (1):57-81. massell, gregory j. 1974 the surrogate proletariat . princeton, new jersey: princeton university press. meijer, m.j. 1972 marriage law and policy in the chinese people's republic . hong kong: hong kong university press. miliband, ralph 1972 marxism and politics . oxford: oxford university press. moore, earrington 1966 the social origins of dictatorship and democracy . new york: harper and row. salaff, j. and j. merkle 1970 "women in revolution", berkeley journal of sociology , xv: 166-191. sid el, ruth 1974 families of fenshang: urban life in china. london: penguin books. ?5 weinbaum, eatya 1976 "wor.e.n in transition to socialism: perspectives on the chinese case", the review of radical political economics , (1) : 24-58. weinbaum, batya 1977 "redefining the question of revolution", the review of radical political economics , 9(3):54-78. weinbaum, batya 1978 the curious courtship of women's liberation and socialism . boston: south end press. wolf, eric ?. 1969 peasant wars of the twentieth century . new york: harper & row. wong , john 1973 land reform in the people's republic of china . new york: praecer publishers. yeh, k.c. 1968 "capital formation", economic trends in communist china , a. eckstein, w. gslenson and t. liu (eds.) , edinburgh: university of edinburgh press. 86 87 cutting government deficits: economic science or class war? hugo radice1 abstract: the financial crisis of 2008 was widely blamed on reckless and predatory behavior by the banks, and public debate therefore centred on supporting employment and reforming the financial system. but during 2010, the focus of attention has shifted to the deficits and debts of governments, which are widely believed to be excessive and unsustainable. it is argued here that cutting government deficits is not an economic necessity, but a strategy for justifying attacks on the living standards of workers and heading off reforms that might threaten the power of the dominant business and financial elites. keywords: public finances; keynesianism; neoliberalism; class rule introduction shortly before the british general election of 6 may 2010 an independent london economic policy think-tank, the institute for fiscal studies (ifs), called for the major parties to ‘come clean’ about their strategies for reducing the public sector debt, if elected to office (chote 2010). the ifs report resonated strongly with the overall public attitude towards the main political parties in the campaign: fuelled by the parliamentary expenses scandal that dominated british politics for much of 2009, many people had come to regard all politicians as devious and untrustworthy. the media response pandered to this attitude by unthinkingly echoing the ifs position. the centre-left guardian asserted that the ifs was “the leading economics think-tank” in the country, clearly implying that its views must be accepted without question. in this particular case that meant accepting not only that 1 life fellow, school of politics and international studies, university of leeds, leeds, u.k.; correspondence to h.k.radice@ leeds.ac.uk. this paper develops arguments originally presented in an article published in the bullet on 4 may 2010: see http://www.socialistproject.ca/bullet/350.php. cutting government deficits: economic science or class war? 88 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research the political parties had to be transparent, but also that the public sector debt had to be reduced. to any critical social scientist, such claims require substantiation. leaving aside the less contentious first claim, that political parties should be open about their intentions, the purpose of this paper is to examine the second claim. is cutting the public debt really an objective economic necessity, or is it actually a deeply political stance, reflecting the interests of business and financial élites? in the next section, i look at the historical reconfiguration of public finances over the last forty years, focusing on the shift during that period from post-war keynesian state interventionism to the neoliberal hegemony that characterizes the current economic policy landscape across the world. the following section then examines the contemporary debates over public sector deficits and sovereign debt, arguing that because of the global savings glut that has persisted right through the crisis that began in 2007, it is not ‘economically necessary’ to give immediate priority to cutting public deficits and debts. in the final section, i suggest that the real reason for the cuts is twofold. on the one hand, the business, financial and political élites—in short, the ruling classes— were obliged in 2008 to summon the interventionist state back onto the stage to avoid a total collapse of global finance, and now want to banish it once more to a merely supportive role. on the other hand, the cuts in state spending and increases in taxes are being structured in such a way as to transfer income and wealth from working people to the rich and powerful: ironically, this has now been authoritatively confirmed in a detailed study by the self-same ifs (browne, 2010). this combined attack, at once economic, political and ideological, requires a response that breaks decisively both with the easy compromises of social democracy, as well as with the unpalatable elitism of vanguard communism. the political economy of state spending in historical perspective over the last forty years, the theory and practice of economic policy has shifted markedly from mainstream post-war keynesianism to the unchallenged hegemony of free-market neoliberalism. although there have been many elements in this overall shift—notably privatization of state enterprises, deregulation of financial markets, the globalization of finance and attacks on trade union rights—public finances have consistently played a central role. continuing a long historical tradition, britain was a pioneer in this shift to neoliberalism. there were two key campaigns in particular that affected the uk: the first during the ‘stagflation’ crisis of the mid-1970s, and the second during the sharp recession of the early 1990s. 89 the 1970s and the rise of thatcherism through the 1950s and 1960s, economic growth in britain had been slower than in continental europe, let alone japan. in the 1970s, slow growth came to be accompanied by both high inflation and the return of mass unemployment, a combination that was completely at odds with conventional keynesian thinking at the time. a long decline of industrial employment in britain also accelerated in the 1970s. this ‘deindustrialization’ was blamed variously on poor business management, a national culture hostile to scientific and technical education, the continuing cost of empire, excessive investment abroad, or the obstructiveness of highlyorganized trade unions. attempts by successive governments to address these problems of decline started under the 1964-70 wilson administrations, and continued through the heath years to the return of labour in 1974. in the decade from 1964, restricting public spending might have been necessitated when sterling was under pressure, but it was not seen as the key to macroeconomic stability. instead, the predominantly keynesian policy mainstream favoured state initiatives in the form of income policies and indicative planning, aiming to reconcile the conflicting interests of employers and unions through the good offices of the state. however, by 1976 these efforts appeared to have failed, as inflation reached a record level of 26% even though unemployment remained stubbornly high—an unprecedented combination that came to be called ‘stagflation’. although keynesians tried to argue that the inflation was largely the result of international developments such as the breakdown of the dollar-gold link in 1971 and the oil shock of 1973, their policies were clearly in disarray. this led to the emergence of two policy platforms standing to left and right of the mainstream. on the left, labour and the unions flirted with an alternative economic strategy which centred on a radical extension of state intervention in the modernization of british industry (london cse group, 1980). on the right, the monetarist followers of milton friedman offered an equally radical diagnosis, blaming stagflation on the fiscal and monetary indiscipline of the government (laidler, 1982). while friedman’s followers argued that inflation was always due to excessive expansion of the money supply by the central bank, in britain bacon and eltis (1980) argued that alongside this, successive governments had ‘crowded out’ private economic activity through the excessive growth of the public sector. following a sudden dip in britain’s trade balance in 1976, a run on the pound forced chancellor healey to turn to the international monetary fund (imf) for help. the public spending cuts that followed signalled an early victory for the monetarist right, and the end of the road for both mainstream keynesianism and the leftist alternative economic strategy. thatcher’s election success in 1979, followed cutting government deficits: economic science or class war? 90 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research by reagan’s in the usa, signalled the return of pre-keynesian economic and social conservatism. in britain, the fierce monetary and fiscal squeeze that ensued put manufacturing to the sword, while the abolition of exchange controls allowed the burgeoning wealth from north sea oil to be invested largely abroad. trade union rights were severely restricted through a series of legislative measures. the breaking of the print unions by rupert murdoch and the defeat of the year-long miners’ strike of 1984-5 signalled an end to the power of organized labour. the second half of the 1980s saw an eventual revival in economic growth, which was widely seen as a triumph for thatcherism (coates and hillard, 1987). politically, that triumph was very well summed up by gamble (1988) as combining the free economy and the strong state: in order to liberate capital from the suffocating embrace of the state, it was necessary for the state itself to act decisively to restrict its own sphere of action. internationally there were soon clear parallels to the rise of thatcherism in britain. the bretton woods international monetary order, set up in 1944 and broadly inspired by keynes, had tied most currencies to the us dollar, which in turn had been tied to gold. the availability of temporary loans from the imf in principle gave governments the leeway to work out their own solutions to deficits in their balance of payments. this system had been abandoned in 1971-2, when the us no longer had the gold reserves to support it, and thereafter currencies were mostly allowed to float, meaning that their values were determined by international market forces. the revival of private international finance accelerated as a result of the massive 1973 rise in oil prices, when oil producers’ revenues were recycled as loans to oil-consuming countries. in 1979, president carter’s federal reserve chairman paul volcker attacked us inflation through a dramatic monetary squeeze, raising interest rates sharply and plunging the us into recession. this not only signalled a shift to monetarist economic policies in the us, but also directly contributed to the third world debt crisis of the 1980s. hit by falling export revenues and a rising cost of debt service from higher interest rates, many developing countries were forced to seek help from the imf and the world bank precisely when those bodies were themselves adopting the revived economic ideology of free markets and sound money. loans were only made available on condition of cuts in public spending and the liberalization of trade and finance, the new development policy that became known as the washington consensus (williamson, 1993). the triumph of neoliberalism – and globalization while the third world was devastated by the debt crisis of the 1980s (haggard & kaufman, 1992), the uk and us financial sectors pressed forward with deregulation at home and expansion abroad, laying the basis for their joint domination of global financial markets. however, by the end of the decade, the us 91 recovery under the reagan administrations ended in a major financial crisis centred on the savings and loan companies that traditionally provided residential mortgage loans. recovery in the uk centred on financial services, retail and property, generating a boom that led to renewed inflation and an unsustainable expansion of credit. meanwhile in japan too, a frenetic stock market and property boom led to a spectacular crash in 1987. when these developments culminated in a global financial bust in 1990-91, coinciding with the fall of communist regimes across the soviet bloc, the freemarket right once again blamed lax monetary policy and excessive public spending. within the european union, this resulted in the strictures of the maastricht treaty, first negotiated in 1991 and finally enacted, after some resistance, in 1993. in relation to public finance, from now on all eu member states were enjoined to limit their fiscal deficits to 3% of gdp, and their aggregate public debts to 60% of gdp. the free-market reforms that the washington consensus had imposed on the third world were now also imposed upon the post-communist ‘transition’ countries of eastern europe and the former soviet union. as a result, economic policy regimes across the world began rapidly converging on a single model, that of neoliberalism. within each country, this took the form of monetary and fiscal policies that prioritized open markets and low inflation, rather than full employment or the eradication of poverty. in the monetary field, the overriding purpose was to achieve a target rate of inflation. because banking and finance were both deregulated and internationally integrated, the money supply became almost impossible to measure, let alone control, and selective state intervention in credit markets was now ruled out. as a result, the rate of interest became the key policy instrument; if inflation exceeded its target, the central bank would raise the rate of interest charged to banks, and if it fell below, they would reduce it. meanwhile, the limits on public expenditure and government deficits not only brought to a halt the expansion of welfare states, but also accelerated the privatization of state-owned industries everywhere, most extensively in the excommunist countries. the wider political economy of neoliberalism centred on two significant processes through the 1990s. the first of these was financialization (epstein, 2005), in which capital accumulation shifts to the financial services sector from the production of other goods and services. while financial firms certainly took full advantage of the sector’s deregulation, the growth in financial markets and the development of new financial products was enthusiastically welcomed by businesses and households alike. for big business in particular, the 1990s saw a boom in mergers, buy-outs and restructuring, and the embedding of financial imperatives within the firm aimed at maximizing profits. this signalled an abrupt end to the more benign ‘managerial cutting government deficits: economic science or class war? 92 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research revolution’ of the post-war period, in which professional management and organized labour supposedly worked together in pursuit of growth, innovation and good working conditions. households, suffering from stagnation in earnings as a result of fierce competition in labour markets, began to pile up debt as they sought to maintain the growth in living standards to which they had become accustomed. unwittingly, they were being transformed from wage-earning workers into universal financial subjects, viewing the world in terms of investment opportunities and capital gains (radice, 2010b). the second important process of change was globalization, which became a dominant subject of study across the social sciences and in political and cultural discourse. after two decades of relative stagnation, the 1990s saw dramatic growth in trade and foreign direct investment (fdi) across all sectors of the economy and in all parts of the world. within the washington consensus, fdi was to replace publicly-funded aid programmes as the primary means of modernization and development, enabling ‘emerging economies’ to take advantage of trade liberalization by expanding their exports to the consumer markets of the rich countries. fdi was also central to the remarkable acceleration of economic growth in asia, especially the rise of china, and in latin america. by the end of the decade, the conventional perception on the left of a third world entirely and inevitably mired in poverty and stagnation had become seriously out of date. these twin processes strongly reinforced the transformation in economic policy regimes everywhere. globalization and financialization ensured that the state’s fiscal and monetary discipline was backed up by the mighty power of global credit markets. the capacity to withdraw funds from states backsliding on their commitment to neoliberalism was exemplified in the dramatic crises that hit mexico in 1994, many east asian countries in 1997, and russia in 1998. with active monetary and fiscal policies to pursue national economic goals now outlawed, the standard policy model became that of the ‘competition state’ (cerny 1997), seeking to attract inward investment flows to boost employment and exports, and to provide the ‘supply-side’ infrastructure for domestic businesses. although the turn of the millennium was accompanied by further outbreaks of financial crisis—for instance, the ‘dot.com’ stock-market bust and argentina in 2001—a new wave of global economic growth accompanied by low inflation appeared to justify the self-satisfied claim that ‘the ‘great moderation’ had arrived (bernanke, 2004). until 2007, the hegemony of neoliberalism seemed assured. the course of the crisis: government deficits and the bond markets the origins and course of the crisis that began in that year have by now generated a large literature (for a fuller account see radice, 2010b). the combination 93 of a long period of growth with exceptionally low interest rates had led to the over-selling of ‘sub-prime’ mortgages to poorer households in the usa, who were persuaded that ever-increasing house prices could provide economic security. like other forms of household loan, these mortgages were funded through securitization, issuing bonds whose value was based on the stream of expected mortgage payments. for the purchasers of such bonds, the risk appeared minimal, since each was based on a diversified bundle of mortgages, so that if some were to go into default, the rest would carry on generating income. in any case, the risk could also be laid off through a new form of insurance eagerly supplied by global investors—the credit default swap. through 2005-7, mortgage defaults climbed as interest rates rose, while both house prices and employment stalled, and it slowly became clear that the risk to the value of mortgage-backed securities had been drastically underestimated. as defaults increased, thousands of banks, insurance companies and other investors such as hedge funds found themselves facing potentially catastrophic losses. with the markets unable to arrive at any clear idea of the real value of trillions of dollars worth of financial assets, day-to-day lending transactions between banks ground to a halt, not just in the usa but around the world. during 2008, the entire global financial sector slid inexorably towards total breakdown. after the bankruptcy of lehman brothers in september 2008, governments began a hectic programme of concerted actions. these were aimed first at supporting the banks so that they could continue to manage the world’s monetary flows, and then, as a world recession rapidly set in, at sustaining aggregate demand. interest rates fell to near-zero and central banks pumped money into their economies. for the worst-hit countries, the imf organised rescues using the methods established in the 1980s third world debt crisis. the traditional g8 summits were hastily supplemented by larger g20 meetings, bringing china, india and brazil among others into the mix. global governance agencies, such as the bank for international settlements and the organization for economic cooperation and development, provided coordination and advice, and began the process of crafting regulatory reforms for the banking sector aimed at avoiding any repetition of the crisis. despite the obvious echoes of the global crisis of the 1930s, however, there has been no repetition, at least in the major capitalist nations, of the catastrophic rises in unemployment and falls in international trade that characterized that decade. this is surely partly due to the dense web of global governance institutions, which scarcely existed eighty years ago. the cooperative response has also reflected the dramatically greater extent of cross-border economic interdependence. however, the proximate reason is undoubtedly the adoption of massive fiscal stimulus packages, most notably in the usa and in china, but also in many other countries. the fiscal stringency of the maastricht treaty and the washington consensus was cutting government deficits: economic science or class war? 94 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research quickly abandoned from late 2008, with current budget deficits rising rapidly to levels ranging from 5% to 15% of gdp or more. however, through the second half of 2009 the tide of support for public intervention began to turn. precisely because the giant investment banks make their money from market-making and transactions, rather than loans and investments, their fortunes quickly recovered from the 2008 debacle, the supreme irony being the vast commissions they got for marketing the flood of new sovereign borrowing, and restructuring and refinancing busted large corporations like general motors. as credit markets began to function again, even the derided ratings agencies like moody’s, which had happily taken fat fees for doling out aaa ratings on sub-prime mortgage-backed securities, recovered their nerve and began to pronounce upon the sustainability of the much higher—and still rising—post-crisis levels of government debt. as the eurozone powers bickered over how to address greece’s fiscal crisis in late 2009, governments recently freed from the shackles of fiscal restraint found themselves once more on the defensive. how and why has this happened? it is striking that at no point in the past forty years of debate on public finances did the monetarist economists—or their neoliberal successors—explain why any particular limit to public deficits and debt was economically necessary. instead we have been offered, then as now, an entirely circular argument. we are told by supposed economic experts that deficit cuts are necessary because international bond markets require them. so why do the investors in international bond markets require cuts? because the economic experts say they are necessary! now it is certainly the case that any single government which accumulates debts that are very high compared to those of other governments will find itself subject to special scrutiny by the bond markets, as the greeks now know only too well, and as many third world governments found out already back in the 1980s. we should of course also make allowance for the pernicious effects of speculators: for instance, the role of george soros in britain’s 1992 crisis that forced it out of the european union’s exchange rate mechanism, or the flight of ‘hot money’ from east asia in 1997. but a reasonable case can still be made that governments should, in normal times, avoid excessive reliance on borrowing, especially to fund current expenditure as opposed to capital investments. however, from the standpoint of macroeconomic stability, and especially that of maintaining full or near-full employment, our overriding concern today should remain that of keynes: the need for governments to sustain economic activity at a time when savings in the private sector greatly exceed investments. this need is met by absorbing excess savings through the sale of government securities, the proceeds of which are then spent so as to sustain aggregate output and employment. 95 there are however big differences in the nature of capitalism today, compared to the 1930s when keynes first made the case for counter-cyclical public spending. in 1933, after the failure of yet another international conference aimed at coordinating responses to the crisis, keynes reluctantly made the case for a national solution led by the state. as a lifelong liberal, he rejected both the soviet experiment of central planning, and the emerging nazi model of extreme economic nationalism under the joint dictatorship of capital and the state. from then on, he consistently argued that international capital movements should be tightly restricted, so that governments could fully exercise the control over national financial markets that they acquired through the sheer scale of their borrowing and their control of the money supply (radice, 1988). but precisely as a result of the combined processes of deregulation, financialization and globalization discussed earlier, governments no longer have this degree of structural power over finance. in addition, for decades now, massive imbalances in international trade between countries have been sustained, with the huge trade surpluses of japan, germany, and now china being matched by the huge deficits of the usa and britain. these trade imbalances are by definition offset by capital flows from surplus to deficit countries, and these flows—as well as the financing of expanded trade—have been a major feature of financial globalization. as a result the keynesian premise, of the state’s structural power over finance, can only be fully applied collectively at the global level. state power over finance could only be re-established within a single country by a radical disengagement from the world economy, but given the economic and political resources invested in building the global economy and its neoliberal order, the cost of doing so would be immense. adopting this approach, we can see that the continued growth and prosperity of countries with chronic trade surpluses, like germany and china, depend, in conditions of global recession, on the willingness of other countries like the usa and britain to continue to run trade deficits. as a corollary—and this is really an economic fact—there will be continuing matching outflows of capital from the former countries, and inflows into the latter. given the current reluctance of businesses and households in the trade-deficit countries to borrow and spend, it is their government borrowing that keeps the world economy going. and the very fact that so many governments have been able to borrow so much since 2008 shows that, despite the global recession, there remains a global savings glut. this savings glut has arisen because of the massive shift from wages to profits, and from the closely-related subordination of hundreds of millions of peasants and independent producers to wage labour in those ‘emerging’ economies. as states have abandoned their earlier commitment to the fiscal mitigation of inequality, the wealthy have increased their grip on global savings. cutting government deficits: economic science or class war? 96 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research as long as those savings continue to exceed global private sector investments, governments must continue to absorb that excess. otherwise, the world economy will slip back into the famous ‘double-dip’ recession, a prospect that has become increasingly likely through the summer of 2010. indeed, as and when the global recovery has reached the point where private sector investment has substantially recovered and cyclical unemployment has disappeared, why should ‘the markets’ require a reduction of government deficits to ‘normal’ levels? there is, after all, no economic law that dictates a 3% cap on the government deficit, and 60% on debt, or indeed any other numerical values. the level of aggregate economic activity is entirely unaffected by the proportion of demand that flows through the public rather than the private sector. as real interest rates swing back to being moderately positive, the power of compound interest is surely enough to sustain the economic advantage of the rich, as well as the pensions of the middle classes. resolving the crisis: restoring class rule in the end, now as in the 1970s, the real reason for the attacks on state borrowing and state expenditure lies not in economics, but in politics, or more specifically in class warfare. for it is primarily through the politics of democracy—even our highly restricted form of it—that the privileged position of private wealth has historically come under threat. after 1945 the propertyless in most parts of the world, west, east and south, made remarkable gains in their well-being and in the strength of their political voice. by the mid-1970s, the propertied classes—whether capitalists, usurers, merchants or landlords, or indeed the soviet-bloc bureaucratic élite—found themselves on the defensive on many fronts. many radical nationalist governments in the third world continued to press for reforms in the governance of the world economy, challenging the new forms of economic colonialism that followed independence (biel, 2000, ch.6). in the soviet bloc, the 1968 prague spring and the first stirrings of the polish workers’ movement in 1970 threatened the bureaucrats’ highly centralised power (harman, 1974). and in the west, not only had new social movements challenged the elites on issues of gender, race and the environment, but workers were also advancing new claims to workplace democracy and economic security that seriously threatened the power of big business and high finance (e.g. rowbotham, segal and wainwright, 1979; gorz, 1985). the previous two sections charted the rise of neoliberalism with a particular focus on public finances. with the benefit of hindsight, the historical logic of that rise seems all too apparent. but the political articulation of an effective response by the ruling classes to the combined challenges of the 1970s was by no means clear at the time. for more than thirty years, the ideologues of neoliberalism, with econo97 mists at the fore, worked assiduously to construct a new common-sense about the economy based on the old liberal mantra: property rights, individualism and the residual state. yet they were constantly faced with resistance, not only from the diverse forces of the left, seeking to at least defend the post-war gains of workers, but also from political strands of the right: nationalism, religious authoritarianism, and even, in parts of the global south, the traditional paternalism that remained from the rule of precapitalist landed interests (barrington moore, 1966). karl polányi (1944) had argued that the nineteenth-century liberal utopia of a market society had historically foundered on the social consequences of subordinating not only produced commodities, but also land, labour and money, to the market—in marx’s terms, to the rule of capital. the result was a historical ‘double movement’: first towards the market society, and then towards social protection. by the turn of the millennium, the restructuring of the state, the redistribution of income and wealth to the rich, and the removal of workers’ collective rights had seemingly turned the tide once more towards the market society. yet in 2007-9, the crisis immediately led to widespread public challenges to the neoliberal order, and the ruling classes were obliged to tear up the neoliberal rulebook in favour of vigorous state intervention. perhaps this heralded the second phase of a new polányian double movement, as hettne (1997) had argued a decade earlier (for a sceptical view see wade, 2010). but as we have seen, within about six months the neoliberals regrouped. in britain, as the debate over labour’s 2009 budget already showed, their ownership of the economic common sense allowed them to steadily shift the focus of debate from exacting retribution and repayment from the banks, to blaming governments for assuming the vast fiscal deficits that have kept capitalism afloat. meanwhile, those who spoke up for real alternatives—for green new deals, for radical reform of the banks, for a new international financial architecture—have been pushed to the margins of public attention. the immediate need, at this juncture, is for the left to continue to make the case for maintaining public expenditure, supporting the efforts of keynesian economists such as paul krugman, robert reich and joseph stiglitz in the us, or david blanchflower and robert skidelsky in britain. across the eu, the progressive economists of the euromemorandum group (2009) have argued this case, and even the international monetary fund has argued that “growth prospects in advanced economies could suffer if an overly severe or poorly planned fiscal consolidation stifles still-weak domestic demand” (imf, 2010, p. 7). however, it is becoming increasingly clear that this is by no means enough, because it takes the easy course of looking back at how the world was before neoliberalism—and often doing so through rose-tinted glasses. james ferguson (2010) argues, in relation to the global south, that returning to the alternative of the decutting government deficits: economic science or class war? 98 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research velopmental state is not enough because the building-blocks of politics—workers, markets, nation-states—have been so fundamentally reconfigured by neoliberal restructuring. in the context of a realistic appreciation of these changes, we can see that the assault on public spending goes far beyond the simple matter of the macroeconomic management of effective demand. in this respect, britain is leading the way, as has so often been the case historically. following the election on 6 may 2010, a coalition government was unexpectedly formed between the conservative party under david cameron, which had won the largest number of seats but not an overall majority, and the much smaller liberal democrats under nick clegg, which had widely been assumed to favour a centre-left coalition with labour. on 22 june, the coalition announced an emergency budget, setting out savage cuts in public spending of up to 25% in all areas except health and overseas aid” (for details see radice, 2010a). however, as government ministers began to detail their substantive plans for the years ahead, it quickly became clear that the immediate macroeconomic consequences were only one issue for the government’s critics. in the key areas of health, education and welfare, the coalition intends a far more radical assault on the nature of the state and its relation to society. this assault is not only aimed at deepening the neoliberal restructuring of institutions, but also at banishing the very idea that societal goals can be advanced through the collective state provision of public goods. the message is relentlessly driven home, that the coalition wants to ‘restore power to the people’, linking service provision directly to clients and engaging the public actively in the substantive shaping of that provision. in historical terms, this is taking britain back not merely to the era before the post-1945 welfare state, but to before the liberal reforms of the early 20th cent ury. however, in every respect the coalition is cleverly building upon initiatives and perceptions already established not only by the tory administrations from 1979 to1997, but also under new labour from 1997 to 2010. new labour dropped the tory experiment under which family doctors commissioned specialist medical services; but in opting for an indirect commissioning model via local bureaucracies under central state control, they ensured that the nhs would still be driven by financial motives and managed along private-sector lines. in education, new labour persistently undermined democratic local control through central initiatives and through the creation of specialist academies at the secondary level. and in welfare, despite some successful initiatives aimed at tackling child poverty, they pursued ‘modernization’ and ‘value for money’ programmes that did nothing to break the weary cycles of poverty and welfare dependency in which so many millions were trapped. however, at a deeper level the neoliberal project is also about reshaping the very nature of citizenship, the way in which individuals imagine and live their relations with each other and with social institutions. in the post-war period, it was generally 99 taken for granted that these relations were shaped by institutions structured around class interests: trade unions, professional associations, and political parties whose ideologies reflected the interests of capital or labour. today, any such concept of class as a mediating force has been expunged from public discourse. on the left, the retreat from statism (social-democratic or communist) led in the 1990s to the famous ‘third way’ of giddens (1999), and the search for progressive elements in ‘civil society’ and ‘social movements’. on the right, the currently-fashionable british ‘red tory’ thinker philip blond (2010) argues that the modern citizen can be mindful of social needs and active in ensuring their provision, while still responding to market signals in the more narrowly economic sphere. the consequence is to deprive anyone seeking to pursue traditional progressive goals of equality, solidarity and sustainable livelihoods of the potential for a collective response to neoliberalism. so can the concept of class be resuscitated? in marx’s work in particular, class is a relational concept centred on the way in which society’s material reproduction is ensured. under capitalism, the predominant but by no means exclusive form of this is capitalist production, based on the separation of the majority from direct appropriation of the means of production. this separation divides society into workers and capitalists, with the many and varied strata of society comprehensible only in terms of their standing in relation to that fundamental division. neoliberalism has developed a double denial of the significance of class division in this sense, building upon the dominant theoretical traditions of mainstream sociology. first, class is redefined empirically in terms of the detailed differentiation of income levels and occupations in society, whose multiple groups are then aggregated into ‘working class’ and ‘middle class’. many marxists have been drawn into this position, accepting the divide between the two, and arguing only that elements of this middle class could still challenge the rule of capital, either in conjunction with or in place of the industrial working class (walker, 1979; for a general review of ‘new class’ theories see king & szelényi, 2004). but as long as the main axes of differentiation are rooted in the production of goods and services as commodities, the common subordination to the dynamics of capitalist accumulation ensures common experiences that potentially unite these supposedly separate ‘classes’, however elusive this unity may have become (meiksins, 1986). the second denial addresses this problem directly, by positing other systematic determinants of the relation between individual and society, firmly based outside the realm of production. this has also been a perennial feature of mainstream sociology, but in recent decades it has been fuelled by the universal rejection of most varieties of marxism for their ‘economic determinism’. twentieth-century marxism, from gramsci to poulantzas and on, had in many respects accepted the criticism, downcutting government deficits: economic science or class war? 100 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research playing the analysis of ‘economic’ production relations in favour of an approach in which ‘the political’ is constituted as ‘relatively autonomous’. but equally, since the 1970s much of the left has rejected ‘class politics’—interpreted narrowly as the sectional interests of the traditional male industrial working class—in favour of the ‘rainbow politics’ of social movements, rooted in the different, supposedly more authentic needs of particular social groups. it seems clear that the rejection of class politics goes hand in hand with the view that economic activity really is constituted separately from other aspects of life in capitalist societies, including politics. however, such a view is at the very core of liberalism as a political ideology. for if the economic is really separated from the political, then its regulation can and should lie outside the realm of political action. in other words, the institution of private property cannot be politically challenged, and property rights cannot be subordinated to human or civil rights in forms such as ‘the right to livelihood’. it is precisely in order to develop a substantive underpinning for this proposition that neoliberalism now seeks to redefine the individual in effect as a capitalist, an economic subject whose engagement with others is mediated by the market, and structured by the accumulation of private capital. since it is self-evident that the great majority of individuals are not ‘capitalists’ in marx’s sense—possessing a sufficient mass of money-capital that can generate at least a subsistence income— they are, instead, seen as capable of accumulating ‘human’ or ‘social’ capital (fine, 2010), the possession of which enables them in principle to acquire money capital. yet they can only do that through the sale of their labour-power—in other words, through wage labour, as members of the working class. in order to escape from the trap that neoliberalism is now springing the left needs to reassert the class nature of capitalism in these terms, albeit without in any sense denying the political significance of other forms of oppression. in a letter to marx, engels (1858) famously quipped that “the english proletariat is actually becoming more and more bourgeois, so that the ultimate aim of this most bourgeois of all nations would appear to be the possession, alongside the bourgeoisie, of a bourgeois aristocracy and a bourgeois proletariat”. the reality is that britain is the most proletarian of nations, in terms of the proportion of its population who rely on wage-labour for their subsistence: there are no peasants left, and small-business capitalism has always been feebler than in other capitalist countries. by recognizing such foundations in present-day economic reality, it may yet prove possible to build a movement of universal appeal that can challenge the class rule of capital. 101 references bacon, r. and eltis, w. (1980). britain’s economic problem: too few producers. london: macmillan. barrington moore, j. r. (1966). social origins of dictatorship and democracy: lord and peasant in the making of the modern world. boston: beacon press. bernanke, b. (2004). ‘the great moderation’. speech to the eastern economic association, 20 february 2004. see http://www.federalreserve.gov/boarddocs/speeches/2004/20040220/default. htm. biel, r. (2000). the new imperialism: crisis and contradictions in north/south relations. london: zed press. blond, p. (2010). red tory: how left and right have broken britain and how we can fix it. london: faber. browne, j. et al. (2010). ‘the distributional effects of tax and benefit reforms between june 2010 and april 2014: a revised assessment’. institute for fiscal studies briefing note bn108, 25 august, available at www.ifs.org.uk/publications/5246. cerny, p. (1997). ‘paradoxes of the competition state: the dynamics of political globalization’. government and opposition 32(1), 251-74. chote, r. et al. (2010). ‘filling the hole: how do the three main uk parties plan to repair the public finances?’. institute for fiscal studies 2010 election briefing note no.12, 27 april, available at www.ifs.org.uk/publications/4848. coates, d. and hillard, j. (eds) (1987). the economic revival of modern britain: the debate between left and right. aldershot: edward elgar. engels, f. (1858). letter to marx of 7 october 1858, in marx-engels collected works 40, 343. epstein, g. (ed) (2005). financialization and the world economy. cheltenham: edward elgar. euromemorandum group (2009). europe in crisis: a critique of the eu’s failure to respond. at http://www.lwbooks.co.uk/ebooks/euromemorandum%202009-2010.pdf. ferguson, j. (2010). ‘the uses of neoliberalism’. antipode 41(s1), 166-84. fine, b. (2010). theories of social capital: researchers behaving badly. london: pluto press. gamble, a. (1988). the free economy and the strong state: the politics of thatcherism. london: macmillan. giddens, a. (1999). the third way: the renewal of social democracy. cambridge: polity press. gorz, a. (1985). paths to paradise: on the liberation from work. boston: south end press. cutting government deficits: economic science or class war? 102 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research harman, c. (1974). bureaucracy and revolution in eastern europe. london: pluto press. haggard, s. and kaufman, r. (eds) (1992). the politics of economic adjustment. princeton: princeton up. hettne, b. (1997). ‘development, security and world order: a regionalist approach’. european journal of development research 9(1), 83-106. international monetary fund (2010). world economic outlook update. 7 july, at http://www.imf. org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2010/update/02/pdf/0710.pdf. king, l.p. and szelényi, i. (2004). theories of the new class: intellectuals and power. minneapolis: university of minnesota press. laidler, d. (1982). monetarist perspectives. oxford: philip allan. london cse group (1980). the alternative economic strategy: a response by the labour movement to the economic crisis. london: cse books. meiksins, p. (1986). ‘beyond the boundary question’. new left review 157, 101-20. polányi, k. (1944). the great transformation: the political and economic origins of our times. beacon hill: beacon press. radice, h. (1988). ‘keynes and the policy of practical protectionism’, in j. v. hillard (ed), j. m. keynes in retrospect. aldershot: edward elgar, 153-71. radice, h. (2010a). ‘britain’s austerity budget: a class act’, the bullet 385. at http://www.socialistproject.ca/bullet/385.php. radice, h. (2010b). ‘confronting the crisis: a class analysis’. socialist register 2011, forthcoming. rowbotham, s., segal, l. and wainwright, h. (1979). beyond the fragments: feminism and the making of socialism. london: merlin books. wade, r. (2010). ‘is the globalization consensus dead?’. antipode 41(s1), 142-65. walker, p. (ed.) (1979). between labour and capital. brighton: harvester press. williamson, j. (1993). ‘democracy and the “washington consensus”’. world development 21(8), 1329-36. on knowledge production, learning and research in struggle | 175 on knowledge production, learning and research in struggle aziz choudry1 [t]he most powerful, visionary dreams of a new society don’t come from little think tanks of smart people or out of the atomized, individualistic world of consumer capitalism, where raging against the status quo is simply the hip thing to do. revolutionary dreams erupt out of political engagement; collective social movements are incubators of new knowledge (robin kelley, 2002, p. 8). introduction in his book, freedom dreams: the black radical imagination, historian robin kelley (2002) points out that social movements generate new knowledge, questions, and theory.2 he also emphasizes the need for concrete and critical engagement with the movements confronting the problems of oppressed peoples. in this article i discuss the politics of learning, knowledge production and research “from the ground up”– that which takes place in social action/social movement contexts. while on the one hand, scholarship on social movements owes significant intellectual debts to the learning, knowledge production and theorizing which occur in the course of social struggles, on the other, the intellectual work, ideas and analysis which emerge from concrete engagement in these struggles are often overlooked and undervalued by the dominant theorizing practices of the academy. further, drawing firstly from the author’s involvement with research and activism around montreal’s 1  aziz choudry is assistant professor, international education, in the department of integrated studies in education, mcgill university (montreal, canada). he recently co-edited organize! building from the local for global justice, learning from the ground up: global perspectives on social movements and knowledge production, and fight back: workplace justice for immigrants . he can be reached at: aziz.choudry@mcgill.ca 2  an earlier draft of this paper was presented at “varieties of socialism, varieties of approaches”, organized by the critical social research collaborative (www.csrcproject. ca), carleton university, ottawa, 5 march 2011. 176 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times immigrant workers centre and wider struggles for immigration/labour justice, and secondly from global justice/anti-colonial organizing in aotearoa/new zealand and the asia-pacific region, for this discussion, this paper argues that critical scholarship should strive to be engaged concretely with social struggles and the knowledge produced in these contexts for both political and intellectual reasons. a growing interdisciplinary body of literature explores the politics and processes of knowledge production from within social movement and political activist milieus. in their article on “movement-relevant theory,” doug bevington and chris dixon (2005) note that just as few activists read social movement theory, important debates inside movement networks often do not enter the scholarly literature about social movements. they contend that social movement scholars do not have a monopoly on theory about movements. they call for recognition of existing movement-generated theory and of dynamic reciprocal engagement by theorists and movement activists in formulating, producing, refining and applying research. they hold that: “[m]ovement participants produce theory as well, although much of it may not be recognizable to conventional social movement studies. this kind of theory both ranges and traverses through multiple levels of abstraction, from everyday organizing to broad analysis” (p. 195). as flacks (2004) asserts, much social movement theory is being driven by attempts to define and refine theoretical concepts which are likely to be “irrelevant or obvious to organizers” (p. 147). kelley (2002) notes that “too often, our standards for evaluating social movements pivot around whether or not they ‘succeeded’ in realizing their visions rather than on their merits or power of the visions themselves” (p. ix). there are dominant tendencies–even among those on the left, within the university and outside–to make assumptions in relation to the relative value and significance of the location of intellectual work (in universities or in a myriad of everyday social action settings), what processes of knowledge production are recognized, and what counts as knowledge, theory or research. as alan sears (2005) puts it, deeper theoretical work is crucial, but “is not simply the property of specialized theorists with lots of formal education.” (p.151). the historian staughton lynd (2011) reminds us that “of the principal luminaries of …marxism, no onenot marx, not engels, not plekhanov, not lenin, not trotsky, not bukharin, not rosa luxemburg (who has a particular contempt for professors), not antonio gramsci, not mao-tse tung–put bread on the table by university teaching…without exception the most significant contribuon knowledge production, learning and research in struggle | 177 tions to marxist thought have come from men and women who were not academics, who passed through the university but did not remain there” (p.144). in addition, there are many located outside of universities who, as maori educationalist linda smith (1999) notes “are referred to as project workers, community activists or consultants, anything but ‘researchers’. they search and record, they select and interpret, they organize and re-present, they make claims on the basis of what they assemble. this is research” (p.17). the voices, ideas, and, indeed, theories produced by those engaged in social struggles are often ignored, rendered invisible, or overwritten with accounts by professionalized ‘experts’ or university-based intellectuals. in the realm of academic knowledge production, original, single authorship is highly valued, which can contribute to a tendency to fail to acknowledge the intellectual contributions of activism, or to recognize the lineages of ideas and theories that have been forged in struggles largely outside of universities, often incrementally, collectively, informally, and sometimes incidentally. an example of scholarly work which has explored the impact of anti-colonial struggles on an influential academic theoretical tradition is the attention that tavares (1992) and buck-morss (2009) have brought to the way in which the haitian revolution (the first and only successful slave revolution in the americas) influenced hegel’s theorizing–in particular the master-slave dialectic. marx (1984) rewrote his theory of the state under the impact of the paris commune. raya dunayevskaya (1958) points out that the spur to finishing the first volume of capital came from the revival of the british working class movement in the context of the u.s. civil war. many examples of feminist, anti-racist, and indigenous scholarship have also arisen and benefited from mass mobilizations challenging patriarchal, racist, colonial–and often capitalist–relations. yet within the university, there remains relatively little awareness of the many important debates and thinking occurring within those networks of activists, social movements, trade unions, community organizations and ngos that take more critical stances in relation to state power and capital. further, we should be aware of the importance of drawing from those who have sought to extend marx, firstly, in terms of thinkers who have emerged from, and been closely tied to anti-colonial and other left democratic struggles in the global south, such as fanon (1968), aijaz ahmad (2000), c.l.r. james (1963), and many others. how, where and in which forms social struggles take place may differ greatly from context to context and challenge some of the dominant lenses applied to 178 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times typologizing/categorizing them as both bayat (1997, 2010) and eschle (2001) remind us. in thinking through the challenges of theorizing social relations and struggles in both global south and north, himani bannerji (2011) contends that “historical and social realities of the world are neither macro-spaces of free-floating imaginaries and abstractions nor bounded within micro-formations and spaces of geographically discrete cultural identities” (p.3). equally, these diverse contexts can be important sites of knowledge production and conceptual tools for other struggles. biju mathew (2005) suggests that “[m]aybe our collective task …is to look carefully as the resurgent left social movements all across africa, asia and latin america and comprehend the ideas of justice that inhere within these movements and the historical memory they are rooted in” (203). david austin (2009) describes theory as being “congealed experience, which, in a concentrated form, can bring years of accumulated knowledge to bear on a particular issue or cause and help to prevent strategic mishaps” (p.115), while kelley (2002) also reminds us of the importance of drawing conceptual resources for contemporary struggles from critical readings of histories of older movements. theorizing social movements, ngos, community organizations and ‘civil society’ at a level which is too abstracted from the very real differences, contradictions and particularities on the ground, especially the geo-historical context, has severe limitations. as adult educationalist paula allman (2001, p.165) puts it, “our action in and on the material world is the mediation or link between our consciousness and objective reality. our consciousness develops from our active engagement with other people, nature, and the objects or processes we produce. in other words, it develops from the sensuous experiencing of reality from within the social relations in which we exist (marx and engels, 1846).” analysis of social movements need to be situated in social dynamics and concrete conditions. bannerji (2011) reminds us that “all meaningful, useful generalizations need to be shown as having a material, a social/ existential and an historical ontology. to think otherwise is to indulge in the absurdity of separating human consciousness from existing human beings and detaching both from lived time. thus micro-histories are part of history or history’s mode of existence, they are inconceivable without each other, and subjugated knowledges are the pedestals of the dominant knowledge” (p.4). thus, in order to understand social movements we need to carefully attend to the political, historical, cultural and economic forces that are at play in any one place, and explicate how they relate to the state, to capital, and to each other. the dominant strands on knowledge production, learning and research in struggle | 179 of social movement theory tend to be reductionist, eurocentric, and disconnected from the social movements and organizations that are the objects of its study. some movements are overlooked or ignored simply because they do not conform to a model or typology through which the researcher approaches the subject (eschle, 2001). inadequate attention is given to questions of geo-history, political economy, and to the politics of knowledge production, both in terms of constructing theory, and of the knowledge(s) emerging from movements. i suggest that a sounder analytical framework might draw from knowledge and theory arising from movements themselves. it would recognize the importance of “history from below” rather than seeking to only interpret movements and mobilizations solely through an imposed interpretative framework or set of variables. close attention must be paid to analyzing the trends of bureaucratization and professionalization in these movement and ngo networks. so theory is not merely created from above to be imposed on material conditions of struggle–it is also born out of practice. just as d. smith (1987, p. 80) notes “the basis for a political economy from the standpoint of labour, according to marx, is precisely that it is grounded in the work and activity of actual individuals producing their existence under definite material conditions,” so too does theory and analysis about ngo and social movement networks require such a concrete grounding in our everyday activities in the world. learning from the ground up in his work on social movements and radical adult education, john holst (2002) refers to the “pedagogy of mobilization” to describe the learning inherent in the building and maintaining of a social movement and its organizations. through participation in a social movement, people learn numerous skills and ways of thinking analytically and strategically as they struggle to understand their movement in motion…. moreover, as coalitions are formed people’s understanding of the interconnectedness of relations within a social totality become increasingly sophisticated (holst, 2002, pp. 87–88). both holst and griff foley’s (1999) work on learning in social action highlight and value the incremental learning and building of knowledge, which arises from actual and dialectical engagement in our everyday world. located in a historical materialist framework, foley’s (1999) book, learning in social action: a contribution to understanding informal education makes a vital contribution to theorizing and making explicit the 180 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times incidental learning processes arising from and contributing to engagement in a range of social struggles. foley emphasizes the importance of “developing an understanding of learning in popular struggle” (p.140). his attention to documenting, making explicit, and valuing incidental forms of learning and knowledge production in social action is in keeping with others who understand that critical consciousness, rigorous research, and theory can and do emerge from engagement in action and organizing contexts, rather than as ideas developed elsewhere by movement elites and dropped down from “above” to “the people” (smith, 1999; shragge, 2003; carroll, 2004; bevington & dixon, 2005; kelley, 2002; kinsman, 2006; newman, 2006). in doing so, foley cautions that although learning through involvement in social struggles can indeed transform power relations, it can also be contradictory and ambiguous. critical alternatives arise from struggle, active engagement, reflection and action. there remains much work to be done in thinking through what kinds of social relations, contexts and circumstances help people move from learning only to adapt to learning that supports resistance, and which can generate theoretical insights and more complex understandings about the world. for foley (1999) this involves theorizing experience, standing back from it, and reordering it, using categories like power, conflict, structure, values and choice. novelli (2010) highlights the dialectics of strategic learning through struggle and contestation which includes incidental, formal, informal, and non-formal education. this implies an engagement in “strategic analysis, which in turn leads to strategic action, and then to intended and unintended consequences of action, and to further reflection/analysis and action” (p.124). foley suggests that we need to make case studies of learning in struggle which make explanatory connections “between learning and education on the one hand, and analysis of political economy, micropolitics, ideology and discourse (or ‘discursive practices’) on the other (p.9). he highlights the importance of embracing a broad conception of education and learning, the relationship between struggle and learning, and an analytical framework which connects learning to its context. i turn now to discuss two examples of activist learning, knowledge production, research and theorizing in social action contexts to further illustrate the significance of these sites and their contributions to intellectual work. firstly, i reflect upon questions of knowledge production, research and theorizing in the context of ‘global justice’ struggles against trade and investment liberalization in networks of ngos, trade unions and social movements opposing the asia pacific economic cooperaon knowledge production, learning and research in struggle | 181 tion (apec) forum during the 1990s. secondly, i discuss aspects of the learning and knowledge production in contemporary immigrant and migrant workers’ struggles. finally, i share some critiques of ngoization which have emerged from within activist milieus engaged in struggles against global capitalism in recent decades. research, knowledge production and activism as noted earlier, social movements and activist milieux can be important sites of research which takes place outside of formal and/or professionalized research settings such as universities. effective research can help move activist practice beyond reacting only to the immediate, and inform longer-term strategy and vision. this is not to claim that all ‘activist research’ is inherently progressive or rigorous anymore than all university research can claim to be rigorous and immaculately constructed. nor is it argued that academic and activist research necessarily exist in finite, separate worlds, although sometimes this might seem to be the case. much activist research of the kind that i have engaged in involves an ongoing process of research in which information has to serve a purpose, is ongoing, and not usually channeled towards the production of one particular research output. taking the time to “get the research right” is crucial–whether in the case of adequately researching details of a meeting venue in order to mount an effective protest action, or in the more formal sense of research on a corporation, policy or practice, which, if poorly researched, can be easily, and publicly discredited by a far better-resourced protagonist and media outlets. this in turn can have serious effects on efforts to build a campaign through reaching and mobilizing a broader base of people. a central aspect of effective activist research is the relationship of trust and engagement built up with social struggles and movements. articulating or explicating activist research methodologies from our own practices (and those of colleagues) is an interesting, and perhaps challenging task which falls outside of the scope of this article. but the notion that there is some kind of natural separation between what some have called the ‘brain’ and the ‘brawn’ of movement is to be challenged since intellectual work, knowledge production, and forms of investigation/research which take place within activism are often inextricably linked to action in many mobilizations, although sometimes overlooked or unrecognized (see choudry and kuyek, forthcoming, 2012). kinsman (2006) warns: “sometimes when we talk about research and activism in the academic world we replicate distinctions 182 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times around notions of consciousness and activity that are detrimental to our objectives. we can fall back on research as being an analysis, or a particular form of consciousness, and activism as about doing things “out there”, which leads to a divorce between consciousness and practice” (p.153). in turn, we should also be wary of replicating such dynamics in activist milieux. political activist ethnography, which builds on dorothy smith’s (1987) work on institutional ethnography, offers useful tools for activist research and knowledge production. george smith (2006) suggests that for activist researchers, there is a wealth of research material and signposts derived from moments of confrontation to explore the way that power in our world is socially organized. he contends that being interrogated by insiders to a ruling regime, like a crown attorney for example, brings a researcher into direct contact with the conceptual relevancies and organizing principles of such regimes. moments of confrontation with ruling regimes were crucial to uncovering aspects of their social organization in global justice activism and research which i have been part of, before entering the university as a student, and, more recently, as faculty. during the 1990s, i was an organizer, educator and researcher for two small aotearoa/new zealand-based activist groups, gatt watchdog and the aotearoa/new zealand apec monitoring group which focused on building opposition to free trade and investment agreements, at domestic and regional (asiapacific) levels. a major focus was the asia pacific economic cooperation (apec) process that included 21 governments in the region, with a goal to advance trade and investment liberalization. apec’s highest profile event was a leaders’ summit, which rotated among apec member countries each year, and had become a target for mobilizations against neoliberal globalization. an important goal for anti-apec activism has been to delegitimize the apec forum and to expose apec governments’ claims of ‘civil society’ involvement and consultation as a sham. analysis of official texts was a key aspect of practice that informed strategy for the opposition to the hosting of apec 1999 in aotearoa/ new zealand. in 1998, well in advance of the start of new zealand’s chairing of apec the following year, i obtained a new zealand cabinet strategy committee paper “apec 1999–engagement with ngos” (new zealand government, 1998) for gatt watchdog under new zealand’s official information act (access to information act). from analyzing this document, it became evident that government intentions were to co-opt ngos and harness them to promote apec domestically, and on knowledge production, learning and research in struggle | 183 also to project to international audiences an image of a democratic government which valued differing opinions. deletions in the document clearly refer to managing the risks (militant opposition to apec), since there are several references to risk management and preparedness for “a protest element”, but gave no specific details to what this entailed, corresponding to sections that have been withheld. what remains in the document is instructive. on the positive side, the government has a real opportunity to develop a wider sense of ownership and participation. ensuring constructive participation by ngos in the apec process will be a critical part of the overall strategy of communicating the what, why and how of apec to the new zealand community. it would serve to demonstrate to the international community new zealand’s ability, as a participatory democracy, to accommodate debate and dissent among a variety of ngos… on the other hand, as the experience of chogm and the mai indicated, there is significant risk of disruption and protest at apec events. in particular we are likely to see a protest element around the leaders’ meeting in auckland in september (p.3). the document also advised that “new zealand’s chairing of apec should reflect the values of an open and participatory democracy where ngos have an opportunity freely to express their views” (p.5). “we propose a dual strategy of constructive engagement: [paragraph deleted]” and then: the target audience in this strategy is not just ngos per se, but also the wider group of “middle” new zealand who will want to see ngo voices given a fair hearing. [deletion] this will require engaging effectively with responsive groups and helping to meet, as far as possible, their own objectives of being seen to influence outcomes…the requirement for cost-effectiveness suggests there will be limits to the extent of outreach that may be possible. it will be important to avoid getting bogged down in long, resource-intensive consultations (p.6). the strategy “involves building broad support for apec and actively managing the risk of disruption” (my italics) (p.7). the new zealand government’s ngo engagement strategy paper was a clear example of a document which operates in the state’s interest in drawing up a plan to contain dissent and manage the government’s image, rather than being a background paper to inform a dialogue among equals. by its use of the term “responsive groups”, the government assumed the right to determine who was in and who was out in new zealand ‘civil society’. it also clearly sought to divide and rule ngos (and other groups) into supposedly constructive and disruptive elements. 184 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times for gatt watchdog and aotearoa/new zealand apec monitoring group activists, our reading of the document was accomplished because of our own confrontation with the government over apec, experience of being targeted by new zealand state security forces for lawful dissent against apec in 1996, involvement in previous years’ anti-apec mobilizations in several countries, and interactions with police at demonstrations and increased surveillance during 1999. having these experiences and analysis was important, but collecting, analyzing and disseminating these documents was essential to building an effective strategy to counter the government’s promotion of apec to ngo networks and community organizations. drawing from these documents, a key part of our anti-apec strategy of 1999 was to explicitly and publicly denounce the new zealand government’s apec taskforce communications strategy, and to politicize attempts to co-opt or silence critics through ‘dialogue’ in a similar fashion to that revealed in canadian official documents relating to the vancouver apec summit. this included a picket of the first dialogue on apec 1999 with ngos outside the office of the ministry of foreign affairs and trade in wellington in january 1999, and a rejection of approaches made by the official apec ngo liaison officer (hired by the new zealand government’s apec taskforce) to discuss apec matters. through media work and dissemination through ngo and community group mailings and meetings, we publicly revealed the government strategy of containment and propaganda through limited dialogue and state surveillance and harassment of the more radical critics. our strategy involved politicizing the disjuncture between stated intentions for dialogue, the calculated actual rationale expressed by the official documents obtained under the official information act, and past actual experience of state practice of criminalization of lawful dissenters who were critical of free trade and investment. after we circulated the cabinet papers to a wide range of ngos and trade unions, the government’s plan to co-opt ngos and harness them to do their work of selling apec to “middle” new zealand failed dismally, with few attending their ngo consultation sessions. the operation of the official information act, and broader questions of transparency, state power and claims of democracy became politicized in this research activism work when various government ministries either refused to divulge or release information, or insisted on imposing expensive processing fees before even considering a request. in turn, we publicized this through mainstream and independent media, finding some journalists sympathetic on this issue for their own reasons of frustration over obstacles to accessing official information, and willing to write critical articles on the matter. on knowledge production, learning and research in struggle | 185 learning and knowledge production in im/migrant workers’ struggles i turn now to focus on aspects of the politics of learning and knowledge production in migrant and immigrant workers’ struggles both in canada and in international networks. defilippis, fisher and shragge (2010) argue that for community organizations to be part of a broader longer-term movement for social change, social analysis and political education are vital. they argue that “[b]oth contribute to understanding that the specific gains made and the struggles organizations undertake are part of something larger, but so is the broader political economy that structures organizational choices” (p.177). montreal’s immigrant workers’ centre (iwc) was set up in 2000 as a community-based workers’ organization in the diverse, working-class neighbourhood of côte-des-neiges by some filipino-canadian union and former union organizers, and other activist and academic allies.3 the iwc engages in individual rights counseling and casework, as well as popular education and political campaigns that reflect the general issues facing immigrant and temporary foreign workers–dismissal, problems with employers, and sometimes inadequate representation by their unions. often these arise from individual cases and form the basis for campaigns and demands which are expressed collectively. labour education is a priority, targeting organizations in the community and increasing workers’ skills and analysis. workshops on themes such as the history of the labour movement, the labour standards act and collective organizing processes have been presented in many organizations that work with immigrants as well as at the iwc itself. for example, the “skills for change” program teaches basic computer literacy, while incorporating workplace analysis and information on labour rights and supporting individuals in becoming more active in defending those rights in their workplaces. the iwc strives to develop leadership among immigrant workers in order to take action on their own behalf. support for self-organizing, direct action, coalition-building and campaigning are used to win gains for workers and to build broader awareness of and support for systemic change in relation to their working conditions and, often, immigration status. as iwc organizer mostafa henaway (forthcoming 2012) puts it, the centre: tries to build from an organizing model that incorporates radical traditions, going back to basics, focusing on outreach, collective organizing, casework, and education. at times, there are many challenges faced in balancing all of these facets in the organization; but each facet 3  immigrant workers centre website: http://iwc-cti.ca 186 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times has proven to be critically important to the political work of the centre, such as weekly outreach outside metro [subway] stations, building relationships with both communities and individual immigrant workers, or attempts to collectivize the casework and individual issues faced by workers, and to respond in a politicized way. the foundation of this organizing has come from these principal organizing methods, in addition to a flexibility in tactics and strategy, due to ever-changing economic conditions in montreal, and globally. significantly, organizations such as the immigrant workers centre, and the workers’ struggles that they support can be key sites of informal and non-formal learning and knowledge production for labour justice struggles. this process occurs through workers’ struggles and contestation of their conditions and rights and is important in winning gains for workers. a recent study on immigrant workers’ struggles in quebec, which conducted extensive interviews (choudry et al. 2009, p. 112) notes: individuals that did eventually take action always did so with the support of others, who provided information and other resources to help them in a dispute with an employer. these others can be unions, community organizations or co-workers or friends with whom they have informal relationships. ‘street smarts’ and small victories are shared between people: this in turn encourages others to take action. such learning most often grows out of pre-existing relations with other individuals, peers or friends. however, organizations play a key role. this study found that learning to question or to resist exists in tension with learning to cope, adapt or ‘get by’–as indeed it does in workplace industrial relations since the emergence of capitalism. sometimes, as rodriguez (2010) notes, such knowledge forms contest not only the power (and knowledge) produced by governments, but also that of professionalized non-governmental organizations (ngos) which purport to speak on behalf of migrant workers. but building alliances with trade unions, through education and supporting internal debates occurring within organized labour to encourage unions to more meaningfully represent the needs and concerns of immigrant and migrant workers is an important aspect of these local and global struggles for justice. as mathew (2005) and others note, migrant and immigrant workers can and do bring their own histories of struggle and organizing strategies from their countries of origin to the new countries in which they labour. for those of us located in universities and engaged in research on im/ migrant workers this work requires some careful reflection and political commitment. commenting on the role of a growing number of ngos on knowledge production, learning and research in struggle | 187 and think-tanks which purport to represent migrant workers’ interests at national and international levels, yet exclude workers themselves, rodriguez (2010) argues that it is vital to pay attention to the knowledge production of those excluded from official venues and who cannot participate in the circuits, virtual and otherwise, frequented by others in the ‘global justice movement’. she says (p. 67), in order to be able to document the kinds of struggles engaged in by migrant worker activists…requires some level of political investment on our part as scholars, for it is in spaces outside of the seats of power, like the space of the street, where migrants can come together not only to narrate their experiences, but also to articulate radical alternatives to the contemporary global order. we must also be aware of the politics of which campaigns, organizations and movements are documented, and which are not. for, as rahila gupta (2004, p. 3) of southall black sisters, a long-established organization supporting asian and african-caribbean women against violence in britain notes, it is not easy for activists “to sit down and record their work, but in this age of information overload you need to record in order almost to prove that you exist.” indeed, for engaged academics working on immigration and labour issues, and for organizers on the frontlines of struggles for social justice, the analyses and knowledge produced in the course of such struggles can be seen as not only important intellectual contributions, but as rich conceptual resources for understanding and challenging the continued exploitation and commodification of migrant workers and immigrants, locally and internationally. the politics of activist research are inevitably impacted by challenges related to mobilizing and maintaining support, continuity and accountability among (and between) activist researchers and broader social struggles. funding and institutional recognition of movement research is not necessarily proportionate to the utility of such work, especially if it is disconnected from the task of building and supporting movements, but rather oriented towards outputs intended to influence decisionmakers in government, private sectors or international organizations. indeed, some ngo research is driven by project-centric cycles and/or compartmentalized logics that are disconnected from social struggles, and more reflective of tensions around funding priorities (petras and veltmeyer, 2001; bazan et al ., 2008). in the above examples, small activist groups which operated on a shoestring budget were able to uncover, analyze and disseminate their research through popular education and relationships with other organizations. 188 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times ngos, ngoization and the ‘global justice’ movement the past decades have seen the ascendancy of non-governmental organizations (ngos) and the widespread valorization of the notion of “civil society” at global and local levels. fowler (2000) sees a number of factors which account for the growth of ngos involved in third world development, and their increased relationships with governments and the private sector. he sees the rightwards shift in northern politics during the reagan-thatcher era as key to “the start of the rise in official finance to, and number of ngos that continues today” (p. 2). this was due to the move away from government to the market as the engine of growth and progress, and “meant more responsibility to citizens and their organizations” (ibid). although funds used to flow primarily from northern governments or financial institutions to southern governments, ngos have increasingly become channels for, and direct recipients of this ‘development assistance’ (hancock, 1989; biel, 2000; petras and veltmeyer, 2001; wallace, 2003; hewson, 2005). there has been an enormous amount of celebratory and triumphalist writing about “civil society”, and both development and advocacy ngos as being inherently “good” forces for progressive change. such claims often fail to consider who is included in and excluded from “civil society”, and pay inadequate attention to the power and role of the state, private sector and international institutions in relation to ngo/community organization milieus which, many argue, are complicit with, and dependent upon the state. even before the fiscal austerity and public sector cuts of the reagan-thatcher era, united nations conferences, increasing intergovernmental forums, agreements, treaties and negotiations had been accompanied by a parallel process of international ngo meetings, campaigns and other activity. besides the institutionalization of ngo involvement in the various arms of the united nations, the policies and statements of intergovernmental organizations such as the world bank (2008) and the asian development bank (asian development bank, 1998) and their representatives have also set parameters for which kinds of ngos will be validated by dialogue or other forms of engagement. alongside this, for many years, a number of critiques of ngos and “ngoization” have been advanced by feminist, marxist, critical race and other critical scholars. these include jad’s (2004) work on the ngoization, cooptation and undermining of the women’s movement and other parts of palestinian “civil society”, kamat’s (2002, 2004) work on the impacts of ngoization and the growth of ngos on political space and development in india and internationally, and incite! women of color on knowledge production, learning and research in struggle | 189 against violence’s (2007) recent analyses of the “non-profit industrial complex” in the americas. for petras and veltmeyer, (2005), and others, the professionalization of community-based ngos and their depoliticization works well for neoliberal regimes, keeping “the existing power structure (vis-à-vis the distribution of society’s resources) intact while promoting a degree (and a local form) of change and development” (p.20). indeed, neoliberal states have often downloaded, privatized and individualized responsibility for social welfare and ‘development’ via ngos and community organizations. in turn, if we trace the lineage of existing scholarly critiques of ngos and institutionalization/demobilization, such analyses of ngoization often owe a debt to collective forms of critical knowledge production, learning and debates emerging from within social movements and activist networks committed to progressive social change. often these tensions and critiques are raised and even worked out in practice before being subjected to academic inquiry. there is a relationship between the ngoization of social change and its impact on knowledge production, and the disciplining of dissent at national and global levels. elsewhere (choudry, 2009, 2010a, 2010b, choudry and shragge, 2011), i interrogate how, within supposedly ‘alternative’ global justice networks, a relatively small ngo elite attempts to claim positional superiority for forms of professionalized knowledge and advocacy that attempt to sideline, filter, or erase more critical positions opposed to capitalism and colonialism. while emphasizing the importance of context-specific approaches to understanding ngos and social movements, i contend that the dominant tendency of ngos is to compartmentalize the world into ‘issues,’ and ‘projects’, and the practice of an “ideology of pragmatism” (choudry, 2010b, p.20) which entails an unwillingness to name or confront capitalism. a form of colonial amnesia seems particularly entrenched in many social justice networks in settler colonial-states like aotearoa/new zealand, canada and australia. a liberal “white economic progressive nationalist” (choudry, 2010b, p.27) nostalgia underpins the framing of alternatives to neoliberalism, entailing the erasure or writing out of canada’s own ongoing colonial injustices and struggles by indigenous peoples for self-determination, and rendering invisible the historical and presentday experiences and struggles of racialized communities. these positions, which replicate, rather than challenge dominant national practices, serve to undermine and contain more critical forms of knowledge production and action in relation to confronting global capitalism. but these processes are also being challenged by ideas and mobilization strategies arising from past and present anti-imperialist and anti-colonial struggles. 190 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times in sum, even within movement networks purportedly committed to ‘global justice’, one finds hierarchies and dynamics around power and knowledge similar to that found in the academy. frequently, for example, questions of immigration, indigenous sovereignty, racism and colonialism are viewed as separate, unrelated issues by ngos and activists critical of neoliberal globalization in the north, while they are often seen as intimately connected by movements in the south (sivanandan, 1982; petras and veltmeyer, 2001; mathew, 2005). many ngos in the north and south replicate dominant approaches to hierarchies of knowledge by favouring academic, professionalized forms over learning developed in social struggles. conclusion: a call for reengagement of academics there is a danger that the conventional processes of production of academic scholarship, and assumptions or claims that such activity constitutes the apex of intellectual rigour and inquiry, can in fact overlook the complexities and dynamics of activism, and the intellectual contributions of activist practice (bevington & dixon, 2005; frampton et al., 2006). i do not imply that these various epistemologies of knowledge (academic and activist) and processes of knowledge production and learning (formal, non-formal, and informal) exist in completely separate universes. yet it seems important to consider how critically engaged scholars located in universities can avoid replicating the tendency to ignore or misconstrue forms of social action and the knowledge produced therein, because they do not fit neatly within a pre-established theoretical framework? academic work on activism and social movements requires some level of political investment on our part as scholars. it also requires an acknowledgement of the intellectual debts that many of us have to knowledge and theory arising from conversations, debates, discussions, dilemmas in the everyday worlds of organizing for social change, reconnecting with ideas and action and the importance of context/dynamics of institutionalization. if we are to play a role in creating a future in a world marked by devastating economic and ecological crises, militarized violence, war and occupation, in which canada is complicit, we need to urgently direct some thought and energy towards building social movements. we now face a period of global economic and political crisis–to be addressed by austerity measures which download the social costs onto the poor and marginalized (mcnally, 2011). we need movements to create counterpower and radical alternatives to the prevailing world order which is on knowledge production, learning and research in struggle | 191 steeped in colonialism, imperialism and war, by building upon, and in dialogue with the intellectual/conceptual resources produced in the course of social movement activism. perhaps one of the most important challenges in the early part of the 21st century for those of us who are privileged to work in universities and are committed to social justice, is to connect, reconnect, renew and ground our scholarly work with/ in continuing struggles here in canada, and around the world. and to make our work count. for, as marx (1968) noted nearly two hundred years ago, “the philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways; the point is to change it”. in theses on feuerbach (ibid), he further reminds us: “all social life is essentially practical. all mysteries which lead theory to mysticism find their rational solution in human practice and in the comprehension of this practice.” references: ahmad, a. (2000). lineages of the present: ideology and politics in contemporary south asia. london: verso. allman, p (2001). critical education against global capitalism: karl marx and revolutionary critical education. westport, ct.: bergin and garvey. asian development bank. (1998, april). cooperation between the asian development bank and nongovernment organizations. manila: asian development bank. retrieved january 20, 2008, from http://adb.org/ documents/policies/cooperation_with_ngos/default.asp?p=polici es austin, d. (2009). education and liberation. mcgill journal of education, 44(1), 107-117. bannerji, h. (2011). demography and democracy: essays on nationalism, gender and ideology. toronto: canadian scholars’ press. bayat, a. (1997). street politics: poor people’s movement’s in iran. new york: columbia university press. bayat, a. (2010). life as politics: how ordinary people change the middle east. stanford, ca: stanford university press. bazan, c., cuellar, n., gómez, i., illsley, c., monterroso, i., pardo, j., rocha, j.l., torres, p., bebbington, a j.. (2008). producing knowledge, generating alternatives? challenges to research oriented ngos in central america and mexico. in bebbington, a. j., hickey, s., and mitlin, d.c. (eds.). can ngos make a difference? the challenge of development alternatives (pp. 174-195). london and new york: zed books. bevington, d., and dixon, c. (2005). “movement-relevant theory: rethinking social movement scholarship and activism,” social movement studies 4(3), 185-208. 192 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times biel, r. (2000). the new imperialism: crisis and contradictions in north/south relations . london and new york: zed books. buck-morss, s. (2009). hegel, haiti and universal history. pittsburgh: university of pittsburgh press. carroll, w.k. (ed.). (2004). critical strategies for social research. toronto: canadian scholars’ press. choudry, a, and kapoor, d. (eds). (2010) learning from the ground up: global perspectives on social movements and knowledge production. new york: palgrave macmillan. choudry, a. (2009). challenging colonial amnesia in social justice activism. in kapoor, d (ed). education, decolonization and development: perspectives from asia, africa and the americas (pp. 95-110). rotterdam: sense. choudry, a. (2010a). what’s left? canada’s ‘global justice’ movement and colonial amnesia. race and class, 52(1), 97-102 . choudry, a. (2010b). global justice? contesting ngoization: knowledge politics and containment in antiglobalization networks. in choudry, a, and kapoor, d. (eds). (2010) learning from the ground up: global perspectives on social movements and knowledge production (pp.17-34). new york: palgrave macmillan. choudry, a. and kuyek, d. (2012, forthcoming). activist research: mapping power relations, informing struggles. in choudry, a., hanley, j., and shragge, e. (eds.). organize! building from the local for global justice . oakland: ca.:pm press. choudry, a. and shragge, e. (2011). disciplining dissent: ngos and community organizations. globalizations, 8:4, 503-517. choudry, a., hanley, j., jordan, s., shragge, e., and stiegman, m. (2009). fight back . workplace justice for immigrants. blacks point, n.s.: fernwood. defilippis, j., fisher, r., and shragge, e. (2010). contesting community: the limits and potential of local organizing. new brunswick, nj.:rutgers university press. dunayevskaya, r. (1958). marxism and freedom: from 1776 until today. new york: bookman associates. eschle, c. (2001). globalizing civil society? social movements and the challenge of global politics from below. in hamel, p., lustiger-thaler, h., nederveen pieterse, j., and roseneil, s. (eds.). globalization and social movements (pp. 61-85). basingstoke: palgrave. fanon, f. (1968). concerning violence. in the wretched of the earth (pp. 35-106). new york: grove press. foley, g. (1999). learning in social action: a contribution to understanding informal education london and new york: zed books. on knowledge production, learning and research in struggle | 193 fowler, a. f. (2000). introduction — beyond partnership: getting real about ngo relationships in the aid system. in fowler, a. f. (ed.). questioning partnership: the reality of aid and ngo relations — special issue of institute of development studies bulletin, 31 (3), 1–13. gupta, r. (2004). some recurring themes: southall black sisters 1979–2003 and still going strong. in from homebreakers to jailbreakers: southall black sisters, ed. r. gupta, pp. 1–27. london: zed books. hancock, g. (1989). lords of poverty. london: macmillan. henaway, m. (2012, forthcoming). immigrant worker organizing in a time of crisis: adapting to the new realities of class and resistance. in choudry, a., hanley, j., and shragge, e. (eds.). organize! building from the local for global justice . oakland: ca.: pm press. hewson, p. (2005). ‘it’s the politics, stupid’. how neoliberal politicians, ngos and rock stars hijacked the global justice movement at gleneagles…and how we let them. in harvie, d., milburn, k., trott, b, and watts, d. shut them down! the g8, gleneagles 2005 and the movement of movements. (pp. 135-149). leeds: dissent! and new york: autonomedia. holst, j. d. (2002). social movements, civil society, and radical adult education. westport, ct.: bergin and garvey. incite! women of color against violence. (eds.). (2007). the revolution will not be funded: beyond the non-profit industrial complex boston, ma.: south end press. jad, i. (2004), the ngo-isation of arab women’s movements. ids bulletin, 35: 34–42. james, c.l.r. (1963). the black jacobins: toussaint l’ouverture and the san domingo revolution. new york: vintage . kamat, s. (2002). development hegemony: ngos and the state in india. oxford: oxford university press. kamat, s. (2004). the privatization of public interest: theorizing ngo discourse in a neoliberal era. review of international political economy, 11 (1) (february), 155-176. kelley, r. d. g. (2002). freedom dreams: the black radical imagination. boston: beacon press. kinsman, g. (2006). “mapping social relations of struggle: activism, ethnography, social organization” in sociology for changing the world: social movements/social research, ed. frampton, c., g. kinsman, a.k. thompson, and k tilleczek. black point, n.s.: fernwood. lynd. s. (2010). from here to there: the staughton lynd reader. oakland. ca.:pm press. marx, k. (1968). theses on feuerbach. in karl marx and frederich engels: selected works. new york: international. accessed online at: http:// www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1845/theses/theses.htm 194 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times marx, k. (1984). the civil war in france: the paris commune. new york: international publishers. mcnally, d. (2011). global slump: the economics and politics of crisis and resistance. oakland, ca.: pm press. new zealand government, cabinet office. (1998, 24 august). “apec 1999. engagement with ngos”, str (98)203. newman, m. (2006). teaching defiance: stories and strategies for activist educators. san francisco, ca.: jossey-bass. novelli, m. (2010). learning to win: exploring knowledge and strategy development in anti-privatization struggles in colombia. in choudry, a, and kapoor, d. (eds.). learning from the ground up: global perspectives on social movements and knowledge production (pp. 121-137). new york: palgrave macmillan. petras, j. and veltmeyer, h. (2005). social movements and state power: argentina, brazil, bolivia, ecuador . london: pluto press. petras, j., and veltmeyer, h. (2001). globalization unmasked: imperialism in the 21st century. new delhi: madhyam. rodriguez, r.m. (2010). on the question of expertise: a critical reflection on “civil society” processes. in choudry, a, and kapoor, d. (eds.). learning from the ground up: global perspectives on social movements and knowledge production (pp. 53-68). new york: palgrave macmillan. sears, a. (2005). a good book, in theory: a guide to theoretical thinking. toronto: broadview press. shragge, e. (2003). activism and social change: lessons for community and local organizing. toronto: university of toronto press. smith, d.e. (1987). the everyday world as problematic: a feminist sociology. toronto: university of toronto press. smith, g. w. (2006). political activist as ethnographer. in sociology for changing the world: social movements/social research, ed. g. kinsman, a. k. thompson, & k. tilleczek, pp. 44–70. black point, ns: fernwood. smith, l.t. (1999). decolonising methodologies: research and indigenous peoples. london: zed books. tavares, p. (1992). hegel et haiti, ou le silence de hegel sur saintdomingue”, chemins critiques 2 (may 1992): 113-31. wallace, t. (2003). ngo dilemmas: trojan horses for global neoliberalism? in panitch, l., and leys, c. (eds.). socialist register 2004: the new imperial challenge (pp. 202-219). london: merlin. world bank. (2008, january). world bank civil society engagement newsletter. retrieved 4 february 2008, from http://web.worldbank.org/ wbsite/external/topics/cso/0,,contentmdk:216 14446~pagepk:220503~pipk:220476~thesitepk:228717,00.html on. 133 community colleges and the division between mental and manual labour david robinson poulantzas ' (1978) analysis of the contribution of the educational apparatus to the reproduction of the division between mental and manual labour is elaborated upon to provide a theoretical framework for examining community colleges in terms of their relationship to the capitalist labour process. the thesis is that community colleges legitimize political relations in the labour process by defining the knowledge of graduates as inferior to the knowledge of university-educated workers trained in comparable specialities . community college programs designed for engineering technicians are discussed in seme detail and a number of suggestions for future research are advanced. alternate routes vol. 5 1982 134 cet article utilise i 'analyse de poulantzas (1978) sur la contribution de i 'appareil educatif dans la reproduction ie la division entre travail manuel et travail intellectuel -our elaborer un cadre theorique permettant i ' examen de la relation entre les colleges communautaires et le proces du travail aapitaliste . l'auteur soutient que les colleges communautaires legitiment les relations politiques dans le proc"es de travail en accordant un statut infirieur au savoir de leurs gradues face aux universitaires formes dans des domaines comparables . ii analyse en detail les programmes des colleges communautaires des techniciens en genie et sugg s ere quelques avenues de recherche . few theoretical or empirical analyses of community college systems have been conducted by canadian sociologists of education. as pike's (1981) recent review of canadian literature on postsecondary education makes very clear, canadian sociologists have devoted far less attention to the area of higher education then they have to elementary and secondary education. the most obvious reason for the paucity of literature on community colleges is that their emergence has been a very recent development in the history of postsecondary education in canada. in fact, most community colleges first opened their doors to students in the early sixties. in spite of their late inception in canada, community colleges currently serve a surprising proportion of postsecondary students, although universities continue to maintain the largest share of graduates, in 1978, community colleges awarded 62,443 135 certificates and diplomas compared to 103,738 degrees awarded by universities (clark and zsigmond , 1981 : 62 , 66) . in the united states, where the genisis of community colleges can be traced to the turn of the century, some sociological work has been carried out. this literature emphasizes the extent to which community colleges have contributed to a stratification process in postsecondary education in the united states as well as the implications of this process for individual mobility (pincus , 1978 , 1980; karabel , 1977 ; mayes, 1977; bowles and gintis,1976; zwerling , 1976) . 1 in this paper, i will depart somewhat from this emphasis, to focus on the role of community colleges in the transmission of skills which are employable in the workplace. while the stratification process is not the immediate concern here, it is, however, an important one at a more general level. in raising the issue of community colleges and work skills, various perspectives which focus on the relationship between schools and the workplace will be examined. after identifying some of the shortcomings of this literature, an alternative position will be proposed, one which focuses on the ideological role of the educational system in the transmission of skills. the work of nicos poulantzas on the contribution of the educational apparatus to the reproduction of the division of mental and manual labour will be utilized since it is particularly helpful in understanding the relationship between community college education and the capitalist workplace. one of the most salient features of community college systems in canada is their emphasis on vocational training or alternate routes vol. 5 1982 136 educational programs which are designed to prepare individuals to assume particular positions in the work world (martin and macdonell , 1978 : 28) . unlike postsecondary education at the university level, which is typically more general, community college programs are often geared toward specific work destinations. as the designation "community college" conveys, many of these institutions are perceived as responding to particular labour market demands arising in the communities in which they are situated. a variety of career -or iented programs are offered to students: training in numerous engineering and medical technologies, nursing studies, clerical and business education, and various other vocational programs which evoke images of skilled positions in the realm of work. the term "community college" is normally associated with larger educational establishments offering a comprehensive range of postsecondary programs. in addition, a variety of more specialized institutions such as schools of technology, agriculture, and nursing, can be included under the broad category of "community college". in comparison to the type of credential conferred by the university, community colleges offer no degrees, although, in some provinces, studies may be continued at the university level. community college programs usually lead to certificates and diplomas, with courses varying 2 in length from one to three years of study." although the "training for skills" function is often explicitly claimed by community colleges, recent "conflict" interpretations of schooling call such an assertion into question (bowles and gintis,1976; shecter , 197" ; collins , 1979; 137 harp, 1980). for example, sociologists who have investigated the origins of public education in canada have advanced the view that the need for technical skills was never a major impetus in the development of canadian educational policy. nor, as its proponents implied, was universal public education designed to provide mobility for the masses. the schools were depended upon to constitute "a successful program of integration" which "would lead to a passivity on the part of people towards the inequality of society" (harp , 1980 : 222) . according to shecter (1977:379), the school system was fashioned to train workers who would be sufficiently disciplined to perform the function of labour in industrial capitalism. bleasdale (1978:14) writes: "the social organization of the school was, in its early form, an almost exact replica of factory organization." with specific regard to technical and vocational training in canada, after examining the historical record, shecter (1977:390-398) and harp (1980: 222-224) arrive at similar judgements. they conclude that the real goal behind such education reflected its social control potential rather than a desire to deliver technical skills. a number of theoretical stances concerning the school's ability to supply technical skills can be isolated. the perspective which views the education system as primarily engaged in training students to fulfil the technical requirements of work has been identified as "technological functionalism" in the sociological literature on education. adherents of this position, perhaps best represented by burton clarke (1962), argue that the skills marketed by the school are tailored to alternate routes vol. 5 1982 138 the exigencies of a technologically complex and advanced societies. in contrast thecentral argument running through the neo-marxist stance put forward by bowles and gintis (1976) is that the chief role of the school is to turn out students whose non-cognitive personality traits and attitudes are conducive to acquiescence in a capitalist work world. in this view of the manner in which educational activities are related to the workplace, the ostensible function of the school in the delivery of cognitive or* technical skills camouflages its role in producing students who will adapt easily to the social relations of production. in this way, the education system aids in the smooth reproduction of capitalist society. randall collins amplifies on bowles and gintis' position that the school's forte is not in the realm of technical training. writing in a neo-weberian conflict vein, collins portrays the school as an agency for producing and distributing status cultures, suggesting that status groups manipulate educational policy in order to regulate entrance into their particular ranks. the myriad types of knowledge which the school produces are understood as contributions to the identity and exclusiveness of status groups rather than to the need for skilled workers. while collins shares bowles and gintis' indictment of technological functionalist theories, his analysis does not proceed from a critique of capitalist society. bowles and gintis have influenced conceptions of the relationship between schools and work more than any other recent writers in the sociology of education. for this reason, the 139 tenets of their thesis and the criticisms which have been leveled against them will be explored further. in their celebrated schooling in capitalist america , bowles and gintis (1976:47) assert that, in the past, theorists have incorrectly perceived work in capitalist society as essentially a technical process requiring an education system which prepares individuals for mastery of technical skills. alternatively, they point to work under capitalism as being principally a social process demanding schools which equip students with the social dispositions necessary for the success of the capitalist system of production. bowles and gintis provide examples of how the evolution of the education system in the united states has been shaped by interests which have primarily reflected capital's need for control over the labour process, rather than for the technical expertise of workers (1976:73-81). in their formulation of what has been 4 labeled the "correspondence principle", they describe how the education system accomplishes its task: the educational system helps integrate youth into the economic system, we believe, through a structural correspondence between its social relations and those of production. the structure of social relations in education not only inures the student to the discipline of the work place, but develops the type of personal demeanor, or modes of self -presentation, self-image, and socialclass identifications which are the crucial ingredients of job adequacy (1976:131). beyond correspondence at the aggregate level, the social relations at varying levels in the education system correspond to the social relations at different layers in the hierarchical division of labour. kence, emphasis on rule following at lower levels of the education system (e.g., junior and senior high alternate routes vol. 5 1982 140 school) parallels the capitalist imperative of tight control over workers at lower levels in the workplace. at higher levels in the education system (e.g., university), the social relations are arranged to prepare students for roles in higher levels of the workplace where dependability and internalization ot the norms of tne enterprise are expected. in their application of the correspondence principle to the educational processes of community colleges, bowles and gintis draw attention to the heavy vocational orientation there compared to four-year universities. they suggest that community colleges have evolved in response to the needs generated by the expansion of corporate capital for new kinds of workers which they define as "skilled sub-professional white-collar workers" (1976:205,206). with regard to social relations, their impression is that the general milieu of the commmunity college classroom bears more resemblance to the high school than to the university. community colleges have often been described as "high schools with ashtrays" (1976: 2] 2). more guidance and control is operative in the community college, there is much less room for individual decisionmaking regarding selection of courses, and the student is restrictd in the pursuit of a liberal education. bowles and gintis also remark that discipline is stressed much more in the community college than in the university, with specific assignments and deadlines more likely to be employed in evaluation procedures. bowles and gintis' work has been helpful in identifying elements of the education system which had previously escaped 141 the attention of sociologists. their contribution has, however, met with a critical reception from neo-marxists as well as sociologists of other theoretical persuasions. the most pervasive objection to their analysis is that it over-estimates the fit between education systems and the capitalist workplace. shapiro (1980), while defending the position that schools assist in the maintnance of the capitalist system, allows the school much more autonomy from the direct influence of capital on educational policy. he suggests that, far from being completely malleable, education systems experience much conflict and contradiction. gorlick c1977) and apple (1980) join in this criticism, contending that students do not merely submit passively to the social relations of the classroom. moreover, worker resistance to the social relations in the workplace is ubiquitous. the implication is that the correspondence principle may not be functioning as bowles and gintis believe. another major problem is that bowles and gintis' approach neglects a large area of investigation which may be crucial in explicating the ideological role of education systems in capitalist society. the concern here is that bowles and gintis have taken for granted the formal or overt curriculum of the school by focusing almost exclusively on what has been feferred to as the "hidden curriculum" (white , 1980 : 56 , 57 , 81) . in the sociology of education literature, the "hidden curriculum" pertains to the mechanisms by which values and norms are promoted by the school. as opposed to the formal content of the explicit curriculum (i.e., such school subjects as alternate routes vol. 5 1982 142 mathematics and reading) , the "hidden curriculum" operates through "the organization of the classroom and the rewards and punishments schools employ to regulate student behavior" (. hum, 1978 : 192) . in this context, because bowles and gintis view the relationship between the education system and the workplace almost exclusively in terms of how the former reproduces the social relations of work, they omit analysis of what is transmitted to students through the overt or explicit curriculum. recent developments in the perspective emerging in britain "the new sociology of education", have challenged this convention of taking the school curriculum as a given. this work points to the importance of examining the nature of school knowledge, an area which has previously remained o unexplored by sociologists. bowles and gintis' assumption that the capitalist system does not rely upon the school for technical skills appears to have prevented them from considering the fact that students at all levels of the education system spend most of their school hours learning and being taught what is presented as "objective knowledge". even if it is conceded that the school's role in reproducing the social relations of production supercedes its contribution to the technical forces of production, it would not be safe to assume that the school has no contribution to nake in training workers to perform specific skills. many workers arrive at the workplace ready to carry out tasks which rhey would be unprepared to conduct successfully if it were not for their educational experience. for example, the computer programmer must learn the skills necessary to command particular 143 computer operations, the draughtsman must be proficient in executing designs on the draughtboard, and the medical practicioner must know the appropriate treatments to prescribe for given illnesses. that the educational system at various levels has the capacity to equip individuals with skills which are, to some extent, applicable in the workplace cannot be q debated. what can be questioned is the logic by which these skills are organized or divided in the capitalist workplace and, subsequently, how the education system succeeds or fails in responding to such logic. it is in this respect that it becomes important to closely scrutinize the overt curriculum which pertains to the delivery of technical skill , and how it relates to the capitalist workplace. from this vantage point, what warrants study is not only the varying social relations at different levels of the education system but, also, the types of knowledge which are peculiar to particular levels. the sociological investigation of classroom knowledge is particularly important when it is considered that the education system is purported to be an agency which generates and dispenses "knowledge". this is not intended to suggest that the elements of the hidden curriculum are of no significance. as apple proposes (1979:40), there is a complementary interplay between the social relations of the classroom and the formal corpus of school knowledge. nevertheless, it is certainly true that sociologists need to know much more about classroom knowledge and its affinity to the workplace. before proceeding to an examination of the relationship between the community college curriculum and the organization alternate routes vol. 5 1982 144 of the capitalist labour process, it is necessary to review some of the primary characteristics of the latter. the owners of the means of production organize and control the labour process to correspond to their interests. work under capitalism is not arranged and modified according to the needs of the workers who perform the labour. braverman's (1974) work has been useful in identifying features of the division of labour in monopoly capitalism. a central theme in his writing is that the capitalist labour process separates the functions of conception and execution: "the separation of hand and brain is the most decisive single step in the division of labour taken by the capitalist mode of production" (braverman, 1974 : 126). this separation results in a small number of managers becoming responsible for the mental labour involved in planning and organizing production while the majority of workers simply carry out the work which has been conceived by management. effectively, capital's monopolization of the technical knowledge of the labour process is ensured and workers are prevented from initiating any changes in the organization of production. poulantzas (1978) has given more rigorous theoretical attention to the notion of the separation of conception from execution, which he speaks of as the mental/manual division of labour. he is emphatic on the point that the division of mental and manual labour is essentially an ideological division rather than one inherent in the actual technologies of capitalist production. it is in this context that he writes (1978:225): "in the actual organization of the labour process, the social division of labour, directly dependant on the relations of 145 production, dominates the technical division." echoing braverman, poulantzas asserts that this division takes place as a condition for ensuring that knowledge is monopolized by capital, through its agents, and removed from the direct producers or manual labourers. the work of mental labour is more precisely delimited in the following manner (1978:238): we could thus say that every form of work that takes the form of a knowledge from which the direct producers are excluded, falls on the mental labour side of the capitalist production process, irrespective of its empirical/natural content, and that this is so whether the direct producers actually do know how to perform this work but do not do so (again not by chance) , or whether they in fact do not know how to perform it (since they are systematically kept away from it) , or whether again there is quite simply nothing that needs to be known. the management and supervision of workers, which constitutes political relations in the capitalist labour process, are legitimized by the division of mental and manual labour. the functions of management and supervision in their capitalist form are justified by the concentration of knowledge or technical expertise in the hands of those individuals who carry out these functions. poulantzas describes this monopolization as a "secrecy of knowledge" which excludes manual labour and is a further step in the capitalist compulsion to detach the direct producers from their means of production. manual labourers are ideologcally dominated by capital in the sense that the knowledge they are supposed not to possess is depicted as the basis for their preclusion from participation in the organization of production. poulantzas elaborates (1978:241) it is not by chance that the various categories of foreman who perform direct supervisory tasks also alternate routes vol. 5 1982 146 present thenselves as bearers of a particular knowledge in relation to the workers whom they control. this is precisely how this work of management and control that is necessary to every "co-operative process" falls to mental labour within the capitalist social division of labour. gorz (1976:175,176) provides a good example of how the possession of knowledge is used to defend political relations, citing the reflections of a technician who justified his supervisory role over manual workers on the basis of his aquisition of training in calculus. the technician admitted he did not use calculus in his job and that workers could gain comparable knowledge through practical experience. he maintained, however, that his calculus set him apart from other workers because he had gained a more comprehensive theoretical knowledge of the work supervised. most of poulantzas' discussion of mental and manual labour is specific to his theory of the political and ideological determinants of the "new petty bourgeoisie". the "new petty bourgeoisie" are agents of capital who perform unproductive labour (economic determination), carry out the functions of supervision and management in the labour process (political determination) , and are located primarily on the mental side of the division between mental and manual labour (ideological determination). it is not necessary, however, to view the division between mental and manual labour only as it pertains to the class determination of the new petty bourgeoisie. the division between mental and manual labour has wider applications. it exists in varying degrees within mental and manual labour and can be understood as a process tendential to 147 1 2 alj levels of the labour process (1978:255). on the side of manual labour, poulantzas notes that the division between mental and manual labour is manifested in the various partitions of skill that exist in the labour process (unskilled, semi-skilled , etc. ) . understood as a monopolization of knowledge which legitimates political relations, the division between mental and manual labour can also be detected in work categories which have traditionally been perceived as mental in orientation. braverman (1974:243-258) illustrates this point in his treatment of how the functions of conception and execution are separated in clerical work as management takes possession of the knowledge involved in the technology of office work. the same holds true for scientific workers who perform supervisory and management functions. braverman (1974:236-247) portrays their work as being divided in such a manner that knowledge is concentrated in varying measures at different levels within their ranks. poulantzas devotes considerable attention to the contribution of the capitalist education system to the reproduction of the division between mental and manual labour (1978:259-270). although based upon observations of the french educational system, his basic propositions may be reworked and applied to the role played by community colleges in the division between mental and manual labour. first, poulantzas considers the major role of the school to be the preparation of mental labour for its function in capitalist production. at the level of higher education, this is achieved through the provision of a general knowledge of the symbols and rituals of technical expertise appropriate to mental labour. alternate routes vol. 5 1982 148 at levels ir the system charged with preparation for manual labour, interest is mainly in teaching "discipline, respect for authority, and the veneration of mental labour that is always "somewhere else" in the educational apparatus" (1978: 266). poulantzas assigns no weight to the ability of the educational system to transfer specific skills to students who will carry out manual work. all components of the educational process in elementary and secondary schools are dismissed as having no utility, with the exception of the hidden curriculum. similarly, poulantzas proposes that the education of mental labour is so general that it is not geared toward providing specific technical skills. again, he emphasizes that the primarv educational transmission at this level entails the ideological "secrecy of knowledge" which elevates mental labour above manual labour. poulantzas' position is well summarized in the following statement (1978:266): the main role of the capitalist school is not to "qualify" manual and mental labour in different ways, but far more to disqualify manual labour (to subjugate it) , by only qualifying mental labour there is no doubt that, in expounding his position on education, poulantzas has exaggerated the role of the division between mental and manual labour. in dichotomizing the education system in terms of preparation for mental and manual labour, he ignores subtle variations at different levels in the system. in one sense, it could even be argued that poulantzas' analysis of the training of manual labour brings us no further than the correspondence principle, in that he reduces the schooling process to the operation of the hidden curriculum. what is seminal about poulantzas' thinking on the school, however, is 149 that he credits the education system with the capacity to inculcate particular conceptions of mental and manual labour which aid in the legitimation of the capitalist division of labour . elements of the division between mental and manual labour are visible in the way in which the education system fragments knowledge to reflect different levels of skills. this is evident in the categories of credentials for many professional specializations, each purporting to correspond to a particular concentration of knowledge or technical expertise. the community college system plays a crucial role in this fragmentation of knowledge. in many cases, the programs available to students relegate them to places in the labour process which are associated with lower or intermediate rungs in the hierarchy of knowledge. graduates of university programs, on the other hand, are placed in the upper reaches of the hierarchy^ if we refer to the division between mental and manual labour in terms of the propensity for knowledge to be monopolized at certain levels in the labour process, it is not difficult to locate community college graduates on the manual side of the division in contrast to university graduates. the discrepancy between the places occupied by the two groups in the workplace is demonstrated in table 1, which presents the most frequent occupational categories of students who graduated from community colleges and universities in 1976. the figures are based on the 1978 statistics canada employment outcome survey, involving a sample of 29,609 postsecondary graduates (clark and zsigmond ,1981) . alternate routes vol. 5 1982 iso table 1 most frequent occupations of 1976 university and college graduates senior § middle managers management support (accountants, auditors, financial 5 personnel officers, etc.) architects 5 engineers architecture s engineering technologists, draughting occupations, surveyors salespeople (commodities) elementary 5 secondary school teaching 5 related occupations vocational § community college, § specialized teachers mathematicians, statiticians, computer scientists physicians, dentists, veterinarians pharmacists, dieticians, optometrists, medical 5 dental technologists nurses, therapists lawyers 5 other law occupations social welfare, community service workers finance 5 statistics clerks stenographers 5 typists general office clerks other » university average annual salary $ 5 college average annual salary $ 7.4 17,200 4.5 12,600 6.9 14,500 3.1 13,100 4.8 18,200 5.5 13,500 2.8 13,900 4.6 11,000 29.5 15,8-2.7 8,900 4.1 16,000 2.7 16,100 2.4 18,800 6.5 12,400 20.0 13,000 3.2 16,000 2.8 14,100 4.2 9,600 6.8 9,100 2.6 10,000 33.4 13,500 39.7 12,500 100.0 100.0total source: table 1 is taken from tab]e 6 and 7 of clark and zsigmond (1981:63,67). the figures represent estimates based on the total sub-sample of 18,849 university graduates and 10,790 college graduates. data on the occupations of 4,629 respondents (15.61 of the total sample) were not available. only the ten most frequent occuptional categories for each group are indicated. consequently, emptv cells do not imply freqencies of zero. the actual frequencies for many of the emptv cells, however, would be too small to permit statistical reliability sub-sample sizes and missing data documentation arp derived from the statistics canada 1976 employment outcome survey data file maintained by the social science data archives, carleton university, ottawa. 151 the sample was designed to represent the 1976 canadian cohort of 26,250 "college", and 66,481 university graduates from nine provinces (qubec was excluded). the tabulations reveal that, relative to university graduates, community college graduates have a much lower rate of participation at the managerial decision-making level. moreover, the large differences in salaries imply that community college graduates who are employed in this category are likely to be assigned to the lower echelons. their representation in the "management support" category leads to a similar conclusion about their position in the workplace relative to university graduates. the clerical occupations, where a large number of community college graduates are clustered, suggest roles comprised of little control over the direction and organization of work. it is also notable that, in the classifications related to engineering and health services, community college graduates fulfil support or assistant functions to higher level positions which are linked to university training. a range of occupational specializations, such as business administration, engineering, and health sciences, may be pursued at both the university and community college levels. what often distinguishes community college programs from university programs within the same specialization, however, is that recruits of the former are prepared for positions which are frequently subject to the supervision of university graduates in the political relations of the labour process. titles such as "assistants", "technicians"., and "technologists" abound in the course offerings of community colleges and are alternate routes vol. 5 1982 152 indicative of the positions community college graduates occupy vis-a-vis workers who have completed university degrees. the specific tasks which its graduates are and are not qualified to perform in the actual work setting are often made quite explicit by the community college. for instance, in an academic calendar for one of ontario's colleges of applied arts and technology (caats) , the roles of graduates are often negatively defined in terms of what the graduate cannot expect to do. it is not uncommon for course descriptions to declare that certain work duties are reserved only for individuals who possess the kind of advanced training provided by universities. in turn, students are alerted to the fact that these superiorqualified workers will be responsible for supervising the work of community college graduates. one is left with the distinct impression that this community college wished to allay any illusions about the scope of the training it provided, and to establish that the knowledge it had to offer was inferior to that of the university. a good example of how the community college circumscribes the range of students' work skills in relation to "advanced" university education is provided in the training of engineering technicians and technologists. accounting for about 16.2 per cent of community college graduates in 1976 (clark and zsigmond, 1981:54), the case of technicians and technologists is worth chronicling in some detail. a unesco document which reports on an international comparison of the education of technicians and technologists, describes the work of this group as "middle men". according to the report, their activities fall between 153 lower level "craftsmen" and university trained engineers, "top level personnel" (french. 1981 : 16-17 ) . braverman (1974: 236-247) has noted that, under monopoly capitalism, the separation of conception from execution has penetrated the work of engineers and other scientists. he atttributes the appearance of a middle layer cadre of technical workers to this phenomenon within the engineering profession. referring to the new group of technical workers, he writes (1974:245,246): there is generally no accepted definition of the term but the distinguishing characteristic of the technician is that he or she functions as a "support" for the engineer or scientist; the routine which can be passed to a lower-paid and slightly trained person goes to the technician. the two to three year community college training period undergone by canadian technicians and technologists would 17 suggest that they are more than "slightly" trained. utilizing poulantzas' criterion, however, it is clear that this group would incline towards the manual side of the division between mental and manual labour, in light of their relationship to engineers. in the province of ontario, materials promoting technician and technologist careers in the various engineering specialities emphasize that training in such fields offers challenging opportunities in the labour force, where comprehensive practical and theoretical skills will be demanded. the accompanying enumerations of routines in which graduates are expected to show competence, point, however, to very specific work skills. the materials intimate that more creative work is the preserve of professional engineers who will summon the services of alternate routes vol. 5 1982 technicians and technologists to implement the practical operations necessary to test their ideas. when more stimulating responsibilities are delegated, aspiring technicians and technologists are assured that engineers will often be available to provide direction. it is not unreasonable to speculate that engineering technology students are reminded daily of the relative merits of their knowledge to that of engineers. frequently, their instructors are professional engineers who have had several years of industrial experience before teaching. not only is educational experience presented as the basis for the exclusion of technicians and technologists from much of the work of engineers, but, within the area of engineering technology itself, there is a further differentiation. the training of technicians, which normally lasts for two years in the community college, is designed to develop skills which are more manual in nature than those of the technologist. the technologist, whose schooling is extended to an additional year, is supposedly certified for more theoretical pursuits. as an electronics engineering technology instructor in an ontario caat put it, the work of the technician is a "hands-on operation" while the technologist's duties require more "thinking". in turn, just as the engineer's training justifies the supervisory role over technicians 3nd technologists, the technologist will sometimes be responsible for overseeing the work of technicians. in ontario, many of the technician and technology programs share a common core of courses during the first four semesters of study, with technologists remaining for a fifth and sixth semester. eight months' of supplementary 1ss training apparently equips technologists with the necessary knowledge to enable them to take a superordinate position to technicians. the role of the educational system in the legitimation of political relations in the labour process is particularly evident in this example. the argument has additional cogency when we consider that the schooling of most engineers, whose knowledge is reputed to be "advanced" in comparison to the knowledge of technicians and technologists, takes place in four years of university training. the education system makes a very definitive contribution to the reproduction of the division between mental and manual labour as it applies to the case of engineers and the engineering technology coterie. in fact, the education system appears to have been structured to permanently maintain the sharp division between the two groups. to take the example of ontario again, the terminal quality of community college credentials prevents technicians and technologists from building on their educational experience to become engineers. the only course open to themis to enrol in a university engineering program. clement (1981: 213-214) provides a good example of this educational barrier in one of the inco mining company's research and development department where engineers and technicians worked closely together in a team environment. in spite of a fair degree of autonomy and input into the research process, the only strategy for career mobility available to the community collegetrained technician was a return to school to pursue a university degree. because the diplomas and certificates awarded by caats are not transferable to university programs, to attain the status of alternate routes vol. 5 1982 is6 engineer the technician or technologist must return to "square one" in the postsecondary system. while i have focused on the training of engineering technicians and technologists, it would not be difficult to expand the analysis to other community college programs. as alluded earlier, a large number of programs are geared towards preparing graduates for roles in the workplace which are subordinate to positions filled by individuals with university training. with its many skill distinctions, the health sciences field provides parallels to the engineering speciality in terms of the division between mental and manual labour. community college programs related to dental, laboratory, and pharmacy technology are also comparable to engineering technician and technologist programs. the field of nursing comprises the largest segment of community college graduates. this is clearly a field subservient to medical careers reserved for university graduates, including nurses trained in four-year bachelor of science programs. finally, community college courses that provide training for cartographic, survey, architectural, museum, and library technicians, and assistants in the legal and accounting professions, can be situated within this 19 discussion. theorists influenced by the technological functionalist paradigm might, argue that the various divisions in postsecondary education reflect the need to arrange the education system in a manner which efficiently transmits technical skills. included in this tradition would be the insistence that advances in science and technology have made it necessary to organize 157 training so that certain individuals master the practical skills required to execute technical advances made in production. at a more theoretical level, the education system is requested to supply a cadre of experts who posses the esoteric knowledge needed to introduce improvements and innovations, as well as to supervise workers who are involved in more rudimentary facets of production. implicit in this view is the assumption that the arrangement of technical roles in production emanates naturally from the progress of technology, and that the labour process is rationally organized to guarantee that production proceeds at maximum efficiency. it is not reconcilable with the marxist premise that the technical division of labour is shaped by the social division of labour. the ideological components of the education system, which operate to maintain the technical division of labour endemic to capitalism, are undiscovered because the technical knowledge disseminated by the school and its application to production are taken for granted. the thesis of this paper also contradicts some of the tenets of bowles and gintis' neo-marxist approach. they do not include an analysis of the formal curriculum of the school and it will be recalled that they perceive the education system as engaged chiefly in the preparation of workers for the social relations of production rather than the training of students for technical competence in the field of work. i submit, however, that the transmission of work skills is central to the role of the community college system. this training function is relevant not so much for its technical alternate routes vol. 5 1982 158 contribution to production, as for its ideological role in the reproduction between mental and manual labour. this position has a number of implications for further research. several questions arise regarding mechanisms within the community college curriculum which serve to mould students' conceptions about their role in the labour process. it is important to focus on how the knowledge presented in the community college classroom is compared to the knowledge university graduates are believed to possess. the promotional literature which the community college prepares to attract its clientele seems to convey the notion that the community college is more elementary than the university. the actual dynamics of how this view is imparted to students, however, requires examination. answers to these questions may revolve primarily around an appraisal of the overt curriculum. the problem of how constituents of the hidden curriculum interact and conform with the overt curriculum may also be relevant. in this connection, it would be appropriate to consider how the modes of social control and organizational structures within the two main branches of postsecondary education reinforce the division between mental and manual labour. in focusing on particular programs, careful attention must be given to the way in which community college curricula vary from university programs in comparable specialities. it may be that community college and university students in related fields share similar curriculum content. if so, an identification of the efforts made to legitimize these similarities will become an essential part of the investigation. an integral component 159 of the overall inquiry would be an examination of the responses of community college students to their anticipated roles in the workplace as well as their perceptions of the positions they will assume in relation to university students. more particularly, such an analysis would be remiss if it failed to probe the possible forms of resistance which community college students exhibit toward the school's assignment of their position in the labour process. the research concerns posed above coincide with many of the questions which have been generated by the "new sociology of education" and methods which have predominated in research being carried out within this perspective may be borrowed. qualitative approaches aimed at uncovering elements of the curriculum which assist in the reproduction of the division between mental and manual labour would have great utility in addressing these questions empirically. this would entail lengthy observations in classrooms in order to assess the content of the curriculum as it relates to the labour process, its mode of presentation and the student response to it. further insight could be gained through informal discussions with students, instructors and administrators. without doubt, such a research programmatic would demand tremendous resources of time and commitment from investigators. in this way, much could be learned, however, not only about the role played by the school in the reproduction of the division between mental and manual labour, but also about the wider ideological processes in which the community college is immersed. alternate routes vol. 5 1982 notes various authors point to the fact that community college students are recruited from lower income and education groups than are students in universities. in addition, the positions which community college graduates eventually occupy in the work world are inferior to those of university graduates in terms of prestige and financial reward. canadian data on the background characteristics of university and community college students show a similar trend for canada (pike, 1980:130; porter, porter and blishen, 1979; dennison et al.,1975). supplementary to the family background data, a statistics canada (clark and zsigmond, 1981) report on 1976 postsecondary graduates confirms that community college graduates command lower salaries than their university trained counterparts. it should be stated at the outset that the nature of community colleges varies by province in canada. some community colleges offer only terminal career programs (ontario) while others offer a mixture of terminal programs and programs which may be continued or transferred to studies at universites (british columbia, quebec'. at the same time, community colleges have in common a non-degree granting status. for more detailed accounts of the diversity of community colleges in canada, consult martin and mcdonell (1978:28-32) and harvey [1973:57-60). see karabel and halsey's (197") review of theoretical work in the sociology of education, where the tenets of technological functionalism and other competing theoretical perspectives in the sub-discipline are delineated . several other american educational theorists have posited similar versions of bowles and gintis' 'correspondence principle" (behn, et al. ,1976; carter, 19"6; levin, 1976). it is interesting to note that they draw attention to the fact that the carnegie commission on higher education in the united states has had a significant impact on the patterning of the community college system in the united states. their insinuation is that capital's interests have been represented in the development of policy on community college education. they also note, as has karabel (1977), that the needs of capital in the area of curricula are represented on an ongoing basis by members from local business communities on community college advisory boards. paul willis' (1977) important british study gives empirical support to this contention. 161 7. in some instances, it is difficult to separate the hidden and overt curricula, since both have the ability to impart norms and values. for example, mcdiarimid and pratt (1971) have demonstrated that the presentation of canadian history in elementary schools (which would be identified as part of the overt curriculum) has often encouraged negative values and beliefs about trade unions, racial groups, and certain political systems, etc. 8 advocates of this perspective prescribe a sociology of education which takes as problematic "what counts as educational knowledge and how it is made available" (young, 1971: 2) . although much of this work focuses on classroom knowledge as negotiable between teachers and students and has been faulted for failing to take into account the external structural constraints on the school (sharp and green, 1975 : 16 -35) , it has stimulated research in the area of curriculum. for a review of the major theoretical positions of the "new sociology of education" see hum (1976). 9 this remark must be qualified with the acknowledgement that we may question how well the education system prepares individuals. collins (1979) has argued persuasively that the education system is less efficient as a training ground for workers than on-the-job training. he contends that workers must supplement their educational training with much practical work experience before they become successful at their work. 10. braverman (1974:114) notes that the designation "separation of conception from execution" and "the separation of mental and manual labour" are roughly equivalent. however, he favours the use of the "separation of conception from execution" since it applies not only to the removal of conception (brain workl from the work of those who perform manual labour (hand work), but also to mental labour itself. 11 in making use of poulantzas' concept of the division between mental and manual labour it is not imperative to accept his theorizing on the determination of class boundaries in toto. for example, wright (1978a:53) questions the validity of using the division between mental and manual labour as the ideological determinant of class boundaries when there are many forms of ideological domination in the labour process. notwithstanding this reservation, wright (1978b : 196-197) concurs that the division is an important form ot ideological domination. 12 poulantzas suggests that it is not appropriate to think of the division between mental and manual labour in 162 terms of "clean jobs" and "dirty jobs", and reminds us that no work can be conceived of as totally devoid of a mental or intellectual component (1978:325,254). 13. see shapiro (1980) for an excellent exposition of the major insights of poulantzas on education. 14. in one of his last essays, john porter (1979:263-280) cites braverman's analysis of "the degradation of work in the twentieth century". porter noted that the education system has spawned an "elite" of highly educated experts whose university training places them in a powerful position in production. in spite of the inflated qualifications needed to procure positions under the experts, porter suggested that many of these subordinate roles involved routinized work that really required little training. while he hesitated to lay the blame on the technical division of labour unique to capitalism, porter was andamant in his assessment that our esteem for credentials represented a misplaced respect that contributed to inequality in access to material privileges and input in the shaping of future society. 15. the statistics canada report grouped all non-university postsecondary graduates under the category of "colleges" (clark and zsigmond , 1981 : 38) . included in this grouping were graduates of colleges of applied arts and sciences, community colleges, institutes of technology, and all other postsecondary institutions which do not offer degree programs (e.g. surveying, agriculture, and nursing schools). the term "college" is equivalent to the term "community college" used throughout this paper . 16. american writers have recognized other features of the community college which are inferior to the university in the united states (zwerling , 1976 ; aronowitz , 1973 : 90-91). these authors call attention to the disparity between the two types of institutions with regard to the funds at their disposal for physical and cultural resources, and point to a cultural poverty of community college campus life. 17. french (1981:87-89) gives a brief overview of canada's system for training technicians and technologists. 18. in ontario, community college instructors are required to have work experience in an area other than teaching. 19. for a more comprehensive list of similar courses of instruction available at the community college level in ontario see horizons 1981/82 (ontario ministry of colleges and universities, 1981:10-17). 163 references apple, michael, w. 1979 ideology and curriculum . london: routledge and kegan pau 1 . 1980 "the other side of the hidden curriculum: correspondence theories and the labour process." interchange , ll(3):s-22. aronowitz, stanley 197 3 false promise: the shaping of american worjcing class consciousnesti new york: mcgraw-hill book company. behn, william h. et al. 1976 "school is bad; work is worse" .martin carnoy and henry m. levin (eds) , the limits of educational reform . new york: david mckay company, inc . : 219244. bleasdale, graham 1978 "towards a political economy of capitalist educational values". randle w. nelson and david a. nock (eds), reading, writing and riches: education and the socio-economic order in north america . toronto : between the lines:ll-39. bowles, samuel and herbert gintis 197 6 schooling in capitalist america: educational reform and the contradictions of economic li f e . new york: basic books inc. braverman, harry 197 4 labour and monopoly capital: the degradation of work in the twentieth century . new york: monthly review press. carter, michael a. 1976 "contradiction and correspondence: analysis of the relation of schooling to work.", martin carnoy and henry m. levin (eds) , t he limits of educational reform . new york: david mckay company, inc . : 219244 . clark, burton r. 1962 educating the expert society . san francisco: chandler publishing company. clark, w and z. zsigmond 1981 job market reality for postsecondary graduates: employment outcome by 1978, two years after graduation"! ottawa: statistics canada . 164 clement, wallace 1981 hard rock mining: industrial relations and technological change at inco . toronto: mcclelland and stewart limited . collins, randall 197 9 the credential society: an historical sociology of education and stratification . new york: academic press. dennison, john d. et al. 197 5 the impact of community colleges: a study of the college concept in british columbia . vancouver : btc. research. french, h.w. 1981 engineering technicians: some problems of nomenclature and classification . paris :unesco . gorlick, sherry 1977 "undermining hierarchy: problems of schooling in capitalist america." monthly review 29(5): 20-36. gorz, andre 1976 "technology, technicians and class struggle." andre gorz fed), the division of labour: the labour process and class struggle in modern capitalism . sussex: the harvester press limited: 159-189. harp, john 1980 "social inequalities and the transmission of knowledge: the case against the schools." john harp and john r. hof ley (eds) , s tructured inequality in canada . scarborough, ontario: prentice-hall of canada: 219-246. harvey, edward 1974 educational systems and the labour market toronto : longman canada limited. hurn, christopher j. 1976 "recent trends in the sociology of education in britaid." harvard educational review 46(1): 105-114. 1978 the limits and possibilities of schooling . boston: allyn and bacon, inc. karabel, jerome 1977 "community colleges and social stratification: submerged class conflict in american higher education." jerome karabel and a.h. halsey eds), power and ideology in education .new york: oxford university press: 232253 . 165 karabel, jerome and a.h. halsey 1977 "educational research: a review and interpretation." jerome karabel and a.h. halsey (eds) , power and ideology in education . new york: oxford university press: 1-85. levin, henry m. 1976 "educational reform: its meaning?" martin carnoy and henry m. levin (eds) , the limits of educational reform . new york: david mckay company, inc . : 23 51 . martin, wilfred b. and allan j. macdonell 197 8 canadian education: a sociological analysis scarborough, ontario: prentice hall of canada ltd. mayes, sharon s. 1977 "the increasing stratification of higher education: ideology and consequence." the journal of educational thought 11 f 1 ) : 16-27. mcdiarmid, garnet and david pratt 1971 teaching prejudice . toronto: ontario institute for studies in education. ministry of colleges and universities 1981 horizons 1981/82 . toronto: ministry of colleges and universities . pike, robert m. 1980 "education, class, and power in canada." richard ossenberg (ed) , power and change in canada . toronto: mcclelland and stewart ltd. 1981 sociological research on higher education 1970-1980: a review of some main" themes in the english language literature . paper presented at the annual meetings of the canadian society for the study of higher education, halifax, nova scotia. pincus, fred 1978 "tracking and community colleges." randle w. nelson and david a. nock (eds), reading , writing and riches .toronto : between the lines:171-211. 1980 "the false promises of community colleges: class conflict and vocational education." harvard educational review 50 (3) : 332361 . 166 porter m.r. and j.porter and b.r.blishen 1979 does money matter? toronto: macmillan of canada . porter, john 1979 the measure of canadian society: education , equality, and opportunity"! toronto : gage publishing limited. poulantzas, nicos 1978 classes in contemporary capitalism . london: verso . shapiro, h. svi 1980 "education and the state in capitalist society: aspects of the sociology of nicos poulantzas." harvard educational review 50 (3) : 3 21 -331"! sharp, rachel and anthony green 197 5 education and social control: a study in progressive primary education . london: routledge and kegan paul. schecter, stephen 1977 "capitalism, class and educational reform in canada." leo panitch (ed) , the canadian state . toronto: university of toronto press: 373-416. white, robert 1980 "knowledge and power: determinants of educational curriculum." alternate routes 4:53-85. willis, paul 1977 learning to labour . westmead, england: saxon house. wright, erik olin 1978a class, crisis and the state . london: verso. 1978b "intellectuals and the class structure of capitalist society." pat walker (ed) , between labour and capital. montreal: black rose books: 191 -211. young, michael r.d. (ed) 1971 knowledge and control: new directions for the sociology of education" london: coll i ermacmillan publishers. zweling, l.s. 197 6 second best: the crisis of the community college . new york: mcgraw hill. crisis and opportunism | 33 crisis and opportunism: public finance trends from stimulus to austerity in canada — christopher stoney and tamara krawchenko1 with crisis comes uncertainly and with it, opportunity. this has certainly characterized responses to the 2007 economic crises and its aftermath. in the early days of the crisis, economists and the neoclassical model alike were battered with contempt from internal and external criticism (nadeau, 2008). even the staunchly neoliberal magazine, the economist, briefly declared the death of neoclassical economics—only to rectify and defend it in its subsequent issue. leading up to the 2007 economic crisis, there had been a movement within economics to question market fundamentalist logic and the increasingly divorced-fromreality mathematical models that had come to define the profession (williams & mcneill, 2005, p.3). neoclassical economics and its bedfellow, neoliberalism, has dominated public policy for so long that its widespread critique since the most recent economic crisis has led to speculation that we are witnessing a paradigm shift. our review of canadian federal public policy and expenditures finds that there has been no such significant or sustained shift and the economic crisis and resulting federal stimulus expenditures have done little to reorient the dominance of neoliberal policy in canada. indeed by 2012 talk of a paradigm shift or significant realignment in the neoliberal consensus had largely evaporated. 1 christopher stoney is associate professor in the school of public policy and administration, director of the centre for urban research and education at carleton university, and co-editor of how ottawa spends. his research interests include infrastructure funding, municipal government and urban sustainability. tamara krawchenko is assistant professor in political science at dalhousie university. her current research focuses on rural community and economic development in the atlantic provinces. 34 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism using powerful imagery, harvie and milburn (2011) epitomize the sense of despair felt by many towards neoliberalism’s seemingly inexorable march: “neoliberalism no longer “makes sense”, but its logic keeps stumbling on, without conscious direction, like a zombie: ugly, persistent and dangerous. such is the “unlife” of a zombie, a body stripped of its goals, unable to adjust itself to the future, unable to make plans. it can only act habitually as it pursues a monomaniacal hunger” (harvie and milburn, 2011). in order to illuminate aspects of the return to ‘business as usual,’ the paper focuses on telling the story of stimulus and austerity in canada by examining federal government expenditures from 2006 onwards using public accounts data (fiscal years 2005-2011). we highlight how the crisis (and the way it was presented) provided opportunities for the harper government to deliver strategic shifts in priorities and spending. in particular, we focus in on the two biggest ministerial portfolio ‘winners’ over this period –the ministries of transport (namely, the department of infrastructure canada) and natural resources. rather than initiating a change in thinking amongst the policy elites we see a continuation, if not a heightening of existing ‘growth-first’ priorities. for canada, this has included a focus on supporting a natural resource driven export economy in support of a political commitment to economic expansion, wealth creation and employment. canada’s stimulus response to the economic crisis can be seen to have been consistent with the harper government’s overall approach of “open federalism,” the two major tenets of which are: smaller government (“keeping the federal government’s spending power within bounds”) and adherence to the constitutional divisions of powers (“respecting areas of provincial jurisdiction” (pm of canada, 2006). significantly, compared to many other countries, the size of canada’s stimulus measures were relatively small (ccpa, 2009, p.2) and much of it focused on tax cuts and some infrastructure spending in which funding contributions from other levels of government were required. harmes argues that ‘open federalism’ is consistent with a “broader neoliberal approach to federalism which, among other aims, seeks to use institutional reforms to lock in more market-oriented public policies” (2007, p.418). of interest in the areas of natural resources and trade is how public policy has promoted an energy-based export agenda—a continuation and yet, new manifestation of harold innis’ staples theory crisis and opportunism | 35 of canadian development (innis, 1956). here, open federalism’s tenets are somewhat relaxed, as the federal government takes a strong interest in resource extraction and the development of infrastructure to support canada’s export markets – areas of major government expenditure and intervention in provincial affairs. in this area the prime minister has been eager to exploit opportunities to sell canada’s oil, gas and other natural resources abroad with particular attention focused on the giant us and emerging chinese markets. consequently, despite a commitment to smaller government and respect for provincial jurisdiction, the federal government finds itself involved in major interventions that favor some regions over others and appears to contradict the basic principles of open federalism. given the political and calculated nature of these interventions we contend that ‘strategic federalism’ provides a better description of the government’s approach than ‘open federalism’. because our focus is on federal spending in canada, we engage mainly with the literature seeking to dissect how neoliberal policies are adopted across time and place. this includes the literature on ‘varieties of neoliberalism’ (cerny, 2004) and that which seeks to understand the distinctive ways in which it is practiced at different scales (e.g., varro, 2010; mackinnon & shaw, 2010). however we are also influenced by ongoing debates concerning broader manifestations of neoliberalism and the impact of particular types of state intervention. in this wider context the paper’s conception of neoliberalization draws on the so-called neoliberal commandments (harvey, 2003) predicated on the washington consensus (williamson, 1990). in particular we emphasize the focus these approaches place on fiscal and monetary austerity, the lowering of inflation rates, trade and financial liberalization, deregulation, and reorientation of public expenditure, the freeing of interest rates, and emergence of independent central banks. we also share harvey’s view that neo-liberalism must be understood as a comprehensive theory of political as well as economic practices as this firmly acknowledges that the state has a key and selective role to play in advancing the neo-liberal project including the creation of “free markets” and “free trade”. (harvey, 2003) state interventions into the economy during the neoliberal era have shifted drastically from protecting individuals from the perils of the market and limiting corporate power during the keynesian era to subsidizing corporations, promoting competitiveness of national economies, and undermining the power of labor (ruckert, 2006). significant in this shift has been the growing power of increasingly global capital, in contrast to largely immobile labour (ruckert, 2009). this has been facilitated 36 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism and reflected by the ‘internationalization of the state’ whereby nation states increasingly prioritize the interests of transnational (financial) capital over domestic (industrial) capital and social groupings (ruckert, 2010; baker, 1999). this has helped fashion the deregulation of financial markets and the opening up of national economies to international competition. importantly ruckert (2010) connects this process to institutional changes, in particular the growing influence of the state agencies that are linked to (and often directly represent) the interests of transnational capital, such as ministries of finance and central banks. the ascendency of financial institutions and the deregulation that has accompanied it has been highly significant in the emergence of neoliberalism and the resulting crisis. as harvie and milburn (2011) argue, while the postwar keynesian settlement contained an explicit deal linking rising real wages to rising productivity, neoliberalism contained an implicit deal based on access to cheap credit. while real wages have stagnated since the late 1970s, the mechanisms of debt have maintained most people’s living standards. the financial crisis shattered the central component of this deal by restricting access to cheap credit and undermining confidence in financial markets and continued growth. faced with a severe financial crisis, governments initially intervened to stimulate spending, subsidize corporations and shore up markets leading to suggestions of a return to keynesian style government and the demise of neoliberal hegemony. however, the hasty return to austerity measures combined with attacks on public services and the public servants that provide them have reaffirmed that any shift in policy will be short-lived and should not be conflated with paradigmatic or fundamental reforms. our analysis of spending trends combined with the government’s stated priorities suggests that canadians face an intensification of neoliberal policies rather than a shift or decline. as such we are likely to see continued and growing inequality within canadian society on a scale greater than before the crisis. warning of the dangers of growing inequality, stiglitz (2012) identifies this trend in the us, with america’s current level of income inequality at historic levels not seen before the great depression. in the boom years before the financial crisis in 2008, the top 1 percent seized more than 65 percent of the gain in national income. in 2010, as the us struggled to emerge from a deep recession, the 1 percent gained 93 percent of the additional income created in the so-called recovery (stiglitz, 2012). with respect to neoliberalism, stiglitz points out that inequality does not arise in a vacuum but from the interplay of market forces and political crisis and opportunism | 37 machinations. over time, he argues, politics has shaped the market in ways that advantage those at the top at the expense of the rest of society. with an economic system that seems to fail most citizens and a political system that appears captive to moneyed interests, he warns of the price of growing inequality in terms of slower growth, lower gdp, greater instability and a variety of social and democratic threats. it is in this context that we examine the policy response of the harper government following the financial crisis and consider the implications for canada the paper is organized into four parts. first, we examine the ‘big picture’ of federal revenue and expenses in canada over the last decade with a focus on stimulus and austerity measures. second, we turn to the ministries of trade and natural resources—two of the biggest ‘winners’ in revenue terms over recent years. we examine just how these ministries have expanded and consider the meaning of this within the broader context of fiscal federalism and the economy. from this high level analysis of public accounts we consider the federal government’s policy priorities and policy focus. third, we reflect on the most recent budget (2012) and what this means for the direction of change. the final section offers conclusions. from stimulus to austerity the onset of the global economic crisis led to a common refrain amongst commentators that “we are all keynesians now”. interestingly, governments that were ideologically opposed to such spending would now need to adopt stimulus policies in order to strengthen investment, consumer and business confidence (and capital liquidity). canada’s response was launched through its 2007 economic statement. the stimulus budget proposed $60 billion in broad-based tax relief over five years. this was followed by a two-year commitment to financial stimulus measures focused on taxation, employment insurance benefits, and infrastructure investments, as outlined in the 2009-10 budget, entitled canada’s economic action plan. similar to other countries, the stimulus measures adopted through canada’s 2009-2010 budget focused on encouraging economic growth. that budget stated stimulus measures were guided by three principles—that they be “timely, targeted and temporary” (government of canada 2009, p.4). the budget further stated that measures would begin within 120 days of the budget being passed; that the measures would focus on targeting businesses and families in the greatest need in order to trigger increases in jobs and output and; finally, that the plan would be phased out 38 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism “when the economy recovers [in order] to avoid long-term structural deficits” (ibid). while some aspects of the plan would be phased out (i.e., infrastructure spending) the stimulus measures clearly stated that one objective would be to “reduce taxes permanently” (department of finance, 2010). we can see in chart 1 below the recession reflected in the government’s public accounts. program expenses increased as a percent of gdp while revenues decreased. it is important to note that part of this revenue decline comes from the decision to reduce taxation in a number of areas. for example the decision to drop two percentage points off of the goods and services tax(gst) and to reduce the corporate tax rate. this figure is further compounded by a contraction of economic growth over these years. while federal government revenues as a percentage of gdp have steadily decreased over the past decade (from 18.1 per cent in 2000-01 to 14.6 per cent in 2010-11), program expenses as a percentage of gdp saw increases in the 2009-10 and 2010-11 periods (at 16.0 and 14.7 per cent respectively). this is a slight increase from the previous three years where program expenditures as a percentage of gdp were steady at 13 per cent. in the past two years there has been an operating deficit (2009-10 and 2010-11) and over the past three year period there has been a budgetary deficit (between 2008-09 and 2010-11). the increasing size of the deficit (both budgetary and operational) has been instrumental in the narrative of austerity. chart 1. public accounts, fiscal transactions, per cent of gdp, 2000-2011 the government posted a budgetary deficit of $55.6 billion for the fiscal year ending march 31, 2010 (department of finance, 2010). finance minister flaherty blamed the 2010 fiscal year record deficit on the $5.6 billion payout to british columbia and ontario to assist with the transition to the harmonized sales tax, and the decision to limit increases in employcrisis and opportunism | 39 ment insurance premiums (ibid.). while these obviously contributed to the overall size of the deficit, they are only part of the fiscal equation with the government also responsible for cuts in direct and indirect taxation over this period in addition to its spending on stimulus measures. clearly the policy preference for tax cuts has helped to diminish government revenues and in doing so has also contributed to the narrative of ‘belt tightening’ for the public sector. having helped manufacture a sizeable deficit, minister flaherty has made it the deficit into as a major public issue and used it to justify austerity measures, warning canadians to brace themselves against significant cutbacks in budget 2012 (ibid.). the chart below illustrates these trends. personal income tax, expressed as a percentage of gdp, has consistently declined over that past decade, with the exception of the 2010-11 period, when there was a slight increase (from 6.8 percent to 7.0 per cent of gdp). total tax revenue as a percentage of gdp has declined and flattened, hitting an all time low over the past three years. corporate income tax as a percentage of gdp has been lower in the past three years than in the previous five. overall, revenues as a percentage of gdp show a declining trend over the past decade. economically, this shift is consistent with the political shift to ‘open federalism’s’ commitment to smaller government. chart 2. public accounts, government of canada revenue by type, percent of gdp, 2000-2011 a high level analysis of public accounts from the past decade shows evidence of ‘roll-back neoliberalism’ (peck and tickell, 2002). government revenues have slowly declined and the public sector is urged to do less with less. the conservative government has expressed a commitment to leave as much as possible to the private sector. the economic crisis has brought with it opportunism – it has led to a wide swath of 40 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism tax cuts (some of them, permanent) and has reoriented spending in a number of areas. the size of the deficit is however part of a fiscal choice to reduce taxation. while the conservative government expresses preference for smaller government and limited spending, there are inconsistencies in the expression of these preferences across portfolios—some ministries and departments have grown considerably, while others have diminished in revenue and policy importance. while we have seen evidence of ‘roll-back neo-liberalism’ there is also evidence of ‘roll-out neoliberalism’ as certain ministries become the focus of government policies and spending. the chart below provides an analysis of the changes in public accounts since 2006. it shows the percentage change of total net expenditures by ministry between the years 2006 and 2001 (in constant 2002 dollars). the red line denotes the average percentage change for all – a 14.30 percentage increase. those ministries above the red line gained more than the average in revenue terms over those years, and those below it lost more than the average. hence, this gives some indications of relative spending priorities. by this analysis, the ministries of transport and natural resources have seen the greatest percentage increases. this percentage change figure should be read with caution in the case of some ministries – the privy council, the governor general, parliament, finance and justice can see major fluctuations in funding for a variety of reasons. for example, parliament and the governor general may have large capital expenditure due to renovations. the privy council (pco) may have special royal commission expenditures (or see fluctuations because it includes the office of the chief electoral officer), and finance can have highly fluctuating transfer payments. from this overall analysis, two federal priorities clearly emerge – infrastructure and natural resources. crisis and opportunism | 41 chart 3. public accounts, percentage change total net ministerial expenditure, 2006-2011, constant dollars federal priorities: infrastructure and natural resources transport and infrastructure the ministry of transport has grown in importance over the years, with numerous agencies and authorities being added to it.2 the chart below shows the total budget by authority within the transport ministry for the fiscal years 2006-2011 (in millions, 2002 constant dollars). it is clear from this analysis why the revenues of the ministry have increased 2 in 2004, the ministry was composed of transport canada, the canadian transportation agency (a regulatory agency) and the transportation appeal tribunal of canada. in 2005, this portfolio was expanded to include the office of infrastructure of canada, the national capital commission, the canada post corporation and the royal canadian mint two years later, it would include the canadian air transport security authority, the federal bridge corporation limited, the jacques cartier and champlain bridges incorporated, via rail canada inc., marine atlantic inc. and old port of montreal corporation inc. the old port of montreal corporation existed under this portfolio from 2006-2009. 42 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism so considerably in the past several years – infrastructure canada has seen massive budgetary increases over this period. the remainder of this section will focus on the gains of this department. chart 4. transport ministry—total budget of authorities used by fiscal year, millions of dollars, 2002 constant dollars stimulus responses in the wake of the late 2007 financial crisis focused on short-term growth (raising aggregate demand) as well as long-term growth by aiming to create favorable conditions for investment and innovation. these measures entailed both revenue side policies (cuts to direct and indirect taxes and social insurance contributions) and spending side policies of which there are many possibilities. one of the most popular choices made by governments on the spending side has been the ramping up of public investment in infrastructure. the infrastructure components of the stimulus measures in canada were approximately $40 billion (cad) over two years.3 the largest portions of the infrastructure measures were tax credits for households – e.g., home renovation and energy efficiency tax credits administered through the canada revenue agency.4 these tax incentives to households accounted for approximately 28 per cent of all 3 this figure is the sum of total reported stimulus measures for 2009 and 2010. this figure does not include funds leveraged by other orders of government e.g., through the creation of stimulus programs requiring matching grants, which, in the canadian case are a significant amount (department of finance canada, 2009). 4 knowledge infrastructure has been excluded (department of finance canada, 2009). crisis and opportunism | 43 infrastructure related stimulus spending.5 the second largest proportion was allocated to social housing, first nations housing and northern housing at approximately 15.4 per cent of total infrastructure related funding and administered through the canada mortgage and housing corporation (cmhc) and indian and northern affairs (inac) in some cases.6 the third largest component of funding was allocated to a mixture of provincial, municipal and first nations, territorial and some federal infrastructure—amounting to approximately nine per cent of total infrastructure related investments.7 many of the infrastructure investments that were chosen were often less complicated projects such as road expansion as opposed to more transformative projects such as transit for which the employment effects of stimulus spending are greater (ccpa, 2009, p.2). in many oecd countries, the infrastructure components of stimulus programs included transformative long-term projects (oecd, 2011). the chart below details spending by major program area for infrastructure canada between the years 2008-2011 (in 2002 constant dollars).8 funding programs have significantly expanded in infrastructure from but two major program areas in the 2008-09 fiscal year to 14 in the 2010-11 fiscal year. some of this is one time funding, such as support for the g20 and g8 summits. however, much of it represents a major program of investment into large infrastructure projects, particularly in areas that support trade such as the asia pacific gateways and corridors initiative; the ontario-quebec continental gateway and trade corridor and; the atlantic gateway and trade corridor. these initiatives involve major partnerships between the federal and provincial and municipal governments to connect canada to eastern, western and southern markets with significant funding attached to the development of border crossings, ports, airports, railway lines and major highways across the region. 5 calculation includes funding for the programs home renovation tax credit; enhancing the energy efficiency of our homes; increasing withdrawal limits under the home buyers’ plan and; first-time home buyers’ tax credit as a proportion of all infrastructure-related funding measures. this figure excludes knowledge infrastructure. 6 ibid. 7 ibid. 8 fields noted ‘not applicable’ (n/a) indicate funding has been discontinued. 44 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism chart 5. office of infrastructure canada – expenditure components by program type, millions of dollars, 2002 constant dollars. the role of the federal government in municipal affairs has gone through waves of engagement and disengagement over the past decades. the harper government is publicly committed to the principles of ‘open federalism’ and seeks to adhere to the constitutional division of powers wherein municipalities are ‘creatures’ of the provinces. however, their strong role in infrastructure development and a particular orientation to trade is a major area of federal involvement—one that sets a strong direction for urban policy in canada’s biggest city regions. in this role, the federal government is a leader, committing vast sums of money to build partnerships that will reorient our urban regions around a trade agenda. crisis and opportunism | 45 natural resources unlike the ministry of transport, the ministry of natural resources has been a relatively stable portfolio.9 the chart below shows the total budget by authority within the natural resources ministry for the fiscal years 2006-2011 (in millions, 2002 constant dollars). as was seen in the case of infrastructure canada, the department of natural resources leads in gains. chart 6. ministry of natural resources, total budget of authorities used by fiscal year, millions of dollars, 2002 constant dollars. the department of natural resources seeks to enhance the use and competitiveness of canada’s natural resources products. the department conducts scientific research and technology development in the fields of energy, forests, mineral and metals and earth sciences. as a lead department in the natural resources development they are involved in environmental assessments and their work must comply with the cana9 it is composed of the department of natural resources, atomic energy of canada limited, the northern pipeline agency, the canadian nuclear safety commission, the national energy board and cape breton development corporation. the cape breton development corporation was disbanded in 2009. 46 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism dian environmental assessment act and the cabinet directive on the environmental assessment of policy plan and program proposals. chart 7 (below) shows expenditure components by program type for the department of natural resources (millions of dollars, 2002 constant dollars). one can see that over the past few years, the department has focused its attentions on adaptation management (including hazard risk management and climate adaptation). some of these functions had previously been undertaken by environment canada and one can make the argument that environmental protection might be better placed there rather than a department whose mandate is resource development. chart 7. department of natural resources – expenditure components by program type, millions of dollars, 2002 constant dollars. the prime minister’s efforts to promote canadian exports abroad and natural resources in particular, has been a key feature of canada’s recent trade and foreign policy. strong lobbying for the keystone xl pipeline and the recent visits to china, malaysia and japan were aimed at increasing trade surpluses with these countries and underline the govcrisis and opportunism | 47 ernment’s strategy to use economic growth as means of paying down the deficit in time for the next election. in a 2006 speech, mr. harper set out his vision of canada as a “global energy superpower power” and was reportedly furious with president obama’s 2011 announcement to delay the keystone xl pipeline for at least a year. soon after, harper had established energy exports as the government’s new top strategic priority, with asia seen as the key market to target, making enbridge’ northern gateway pipeline to the seaport at kitimat bc an essential project (wells and mcmahon, 2012). this context helps explain why environmental assessments have recently been streamlined and also the alacrity with which prime minister harper appears to have backtracked in relation to china’s record on human rights. as corcoran observes “his [mr. harper’s] previous issues with china appear to have been sidelined, replaced in part by some neonixonian strategizing over potential economic advantage over the united states” (corcoran, 2012). heading to china, mr. harper set out his intentions and his hopes very clearly: “[a]s you know, our country is looking for new markets for our goods and services and china and the entire asiapacific region is an area of tremendous opportunity,” and added, “[w]e hope to expand on our strategic partnership with china and, in particular, we hope to deepen the economic and trade ties between our two countries” (corcoran, 2012). this represents a significant shift in policy by the government and it remains to be seen how the us will react and how deeper trade ties with china and asia will develop. opportunism amidst crisis: the narrative of austerity and the 2012 federal budget having examined federal expenditures over the past several years, we turn here to the most recent federal budget to examine some of its implications for policy development in the near term. for several reasons, the 2012 budget can be seen as a watershed moment in a politically realigned canada and speculation was intense leading up to its release. the conservatives having secured a much sought after majority were finally in a position to define their political agenda without having to depend on the mercurial support of the opposition parties. political opponents feared that the way was now clear for the conservatives to push ahead with the implementation of the so-called harper agenda, particularly in view of the fact that both the ndp and liberal parties had spent most of 2011-12 in limbo as they attempted to (re)establish long-term leadership and political direction. that said an uncertain 48 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism and fragile fiscal and economic climate, a weak majority and a series of political scandals including the so-called “in and out” scandal, misuse of the g8/g20 border infrastructure fund and the “robocall” election fraud made this a challenging environment within which to introduce an austerity budget. in particular it required the government to tread carefully as it balanced cuts in public spending with the fragile economic recovery and the political fallout that typically accompanies cuts in core services and benefits such as pensions and old age security spending. when the conservatives came to power in 2006 they inherited a budget surplus of $8-billion. in 2008, the government entered into a deficit due to falling tax revenue and higher spending. in its november 2011 economic update, the government projected canada’s deficit for 2011-2012 would be $31-billion, although recent indicators suggest it could be lower. in 2010-2011, canada’s actual deficit was $33.4-billion. whether or not the 2012 budget is seen as draconian response to this size of deficit, the government’s majority allied to its commitment to slay the deficit created an opportunity to prioritize its spending and program commitments in a way that was not conceivable in previous years. as during the election campaign, mr. flaherty and the prime minister said repeatedly that jobs and economic growth are their first priority. not surprisingly therefore, the first harper majority government budget on march 29th was titled and pitched as a jobs, growth and long-term prosperity budget, with links back to the economic action plan from their minority government years. stressing that canada has done relatively well in the global recession context and in job creation since 2009, finance minister jim flaherty emphasized instead the structural problems that canada must now address both for long-term prosperity and “to ensure the sustainability of public finances and social programs for future generations” the structural fundamentalism of the budget, that is, its greater focus on steps needed to ensure the full potential of the economy is intended to be the main message.10 the harper list of policies and initiatives (spending, tax and regulatory in nature) in their order of presentation include: • supporting entrepreneurs, innovators and worldclass research • responsible resource development • expanding trade and opening new markets for canadian business 10 on structural fundamentalism, see doern et al, 2013, chapter 3. crisis and opportunism | 49 • investing in training, infrastructure and opportunity • expanding opportunities for aboriginal peoples to fully participate in the economy • building a fast and flexible economic immigration system • sustainable social programs and secure retirement • responsible expenditure management11 the budget cuts of $5.2 billion, mainly referred to in the final “responsible expenditure management” section are not highlighted although considerable attention is drawn in the budget to the elimination of 19,200 civil service jobs. among the agencies mentioned in the budget to be eliminated outright are assisted human reproduction canada (beset with constitutional and court challenges) and the national roundtable on the environment and the economy (an advisory body not favoured by the conservatives, in part because of its climate change policy advocacy). further budget cuts are planned to reach about $5 billion a year by 2014-2015 (see further discussion below of cuts and the strategic review process headed by treasury board president, tony clement). under the above structural themes other key particular initiatives were announced in budget 2012). among these are: • increase funding for research and development by small and medium-sized companies, including through a refocusing of the role of the national research council. • in the resource development sphere, bring forward legislation to achieve the goal of “one project, one review” in a clearly defined period. • pursue new and deeper trading relationships, particularly with large, dynamic and fast-growing economies. • invest in first nations education on reserve, including early literacy programming and other supports and services to first nations schools and students. • move to an increasingly fast and flexible immigration system where priority focus is on meeting canada’s labour market needs. • gradually increase the age of eligibility for old age security (oas) and guaranteed income supplement benefits from 65 to 67. 11 government of canada, 2012, p.5-11. 50 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism this change will start in april 2023 with full implementation by january 2029, and will not affect anyone who is 54 years of age or older as of march 31st, 2012.12 as these priorities and initiatives demonstrate, the government’s response to the fiscal crisis has been influenced by the neoliberal framework and “commandments” outlined in the introduction. just as the financial crisis in canada was at least in part manufactured by domestic fiscal policy, the urgency with which the deficit is being tackled is just as much a question of politics as it is economics. in a political context it is important that the deficit is reduced quickly and, specifically, in time for the next federal election. having already committed to return to a surplus position by then the question for the conservatives appears to be how not whether to implement cuts. to this end much emphasis has been placed on strategic review. in canada, “program reviews” that check all government spending have been a feature of public sector managing since the late 1970s. at that time these reviews were infrequent and usually responded to political promises that spending would be kept to a minimum. it was not until the late 1990s that such reviews became a routine feature of canadian public management, culminating in “strategic reviews” introduced in 2006, and now “operational reviews” (not the same thing) introduced in 2011. these latter reviews are intended to find significant one-time cuts in services, rather than ongoing and permanent cuts as in the case of the former. “strategic reviews” were introduced to force departments and agencies to find critical savings and to use these savings to align with key government priorities. such reviews are conducted every four years with the objective of finding five percent savings from low performing, low priority programs and services. the goal of the latest strategic and operating review is to find ongoing savings of at least $4-billion a year by 2014-2015 from departments’ total $80-billion operating budget. this represents only one part of total federal spending and includes the cost of staff and benefits etc. the rest of the spending, including $150-billion in program spending and transfers, are not part of the spending review. consequently out of a total spending of almost $250-billion, including about $30-billion in interest on the federal debt, the government aims to cut spending by 1.5%. more than 60 departments have submitted plans to cabinet for either five to 10 per cent cuts to their budgets, by finding operating efficiencies and examining the usefulness of programs. 12 government of canada, 2012, p.5-11. crisis and opportunism | 51 the stated desire to avoid cuts in services is attractive to governments because it reduces the political fall-out with the electorate and provides the opposition and critics with less ammunition. the government’s strategy is to present cuts as targeting inefficiency, red tape and redundant “back room” bureaucrats rather than services and benefits. in order to further reduce the political pain some commentators have suggested that mr. flaherty is also conducting a “strategy by stealth” approach to realizing cuts and deficit reduction (reynolds, 2011). this view is predicated on two main patterns of action that have helped minister flaherty achieve “real dollar, per-capita austerity” over the each of the last 5 years without the kinds of protests and political fallout seen in other countries in response to austerity measures. first, reynolds points to program spending increases that are less than the amount needed to keep pace with population-plus inflation adjustments. a budget prepared in this way will show nominal increases in national expenditure every year (averaging 2 per cent a year) even though they are, de-facto, cuts. second, he points to minister flaherty’s attempts to look for and weed out government programs that are no longer seen to serve a productive purpose. by making small, incremental spending cuts, “here and there, hither and yon”, he contends that minister. flaherty has provided the world with a good example of “responsible restraint – without inciting mobs” (reynolds, 2011). because these kinds of cuts are difficult to notice, he describes the process as “austerity on the quiet” (reynolds, 2011). clearly this approach is politically attractive as it avoids minus signs on the fiscal ledger, and it is harder for the opposition to galvanize resistance around specific or draconian cuts. reynolds concludes it is an effective strategy that has managed to realize $10billion of savings in recent years. in spite of the political attractiveness of stealth as a means of achieving reductions many fiscal conservatives would like to see more severe cuts, particularly in areas that have become political and ideological targets or simply to signal government priorities. not surprisingly in this context, further job cuts are predicted for environment canada, in addition to the 776 already announced in 2011-12. consistent with a neoliberal agenda, environmental assessments have been seen to slow down projects and the exploitation of natural resources across canada, and in its northern regions in particular, and the government is keen to suspend these for projects pending, labeling them as excessive red tape and impediments to economic growth and jobs. specific programs and green energy initiatives were also being pinpointed for cuts and/or eradication. the target of these proposed cuts are clearly green and renewable energy programs 52 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism which, since the expansion of the alberta tar sands, have increasingly come to symbolize the deepening ideological divide between canada’s left and right on energy and environmental policy as well as the splits between the provinces. while ontario and other provinces have begun to seriously invest in renewable energy programs, alberta and saskatchewan look to the federal government for policies that facilitate greater exploitation of oil and gas as well as other natural resources. given the harper conservative’s commitment to jobs, growth, increased trade and their western political base, it is no surprise that spending on the environment and in renewable energies continues to be vulnerable. consequently the government has sought to minimize climate change as an issue, withdrawn from kyoto and effectively given up the pretence of taking serious action to reduce emissions. however, it is not just the substance of the 2012 budget that has caused concern; critics also point to the lack of transparency and informed debate that has been a constant feature of the process. bill c-38, also called the jobs, growth and long-term prosperity act, tabled the 2012 budget as part of a so-called omnibus bill. over 420 pages long, it has been described as a “statutory juggernaut” that introduces, amends, or repeals nearly 70 federal laws. it has been presented to the house of commons in a manner that may be without close precedent in canadian parliamentary history and has made proper parliamentary scrutiny impossible in the time available (galvin, 2012). the parliamentary budget officer has also been concerned by the lack of reporting to parliament on the impact of the cuts announced in the 2012 budget as well as the previous two and is fighting to have details released by the government. liberal mp john mccallum said this “slow oozing” of information over months erodes transparency and accountability and silences any debate at committees on what programs and services canadians may be losing (may, 2012). he also expected this delay and “lack of transparency” since treasury board recently ordered departments not to include details about the reductions in their annual planning and priorities reports to parliament (may 2012). conclusion the policy practices of the harper government over the past few years have transformed much of what the state does and how it does it. the narrative of austerity has been formative in the ability of the government to push through these transformative changes. in particular, the economic crisis and canada’s growing reliance on oil and crisis and opportunism | 53 gas for its economic wellbeing has allowed the government to shift policy direction in ways that might have seemed impossible when they came to power. as this paper has shown, the crisis of austerity is at least in part a manufactured one—based on the decision to reduce taxation in a number of areas. this narrative of ‘crisis’ has been instrumental in reducing government involvement in a range of activities and in plans to decrease the size of the public service significantly. numerous women’s groups have lost their funding; the roundtable for the environment and the economy has been disbanded; as has the canadian council on learning.13 these are but a small sample of groups and policy issues affected. at the same time, regulatory and oversight mechanisms are being eroded in such areas as trade and environmental assessments (woods, 2012). while the government is divesting its involvement in many areas, it is increasing them in others—as we have shown through the departments of infrastructure and natural resources. consequently, we argue that ‘open federalism’ is a serious misnomer and that ‘strategic federalism’ better describes the selective nature of the federal role under the harper government. our analysis of public accounts has sought to take a look at overall spending patterns and focus on two examples, but the data holds many stories of interest. rather than abandoning the neoliberal project, we believe that recent budgets, policies and priorities suggest that a more intense and comprehensive neoliberal agenda is emerging in canada. dissecting these changes and what they mean for the longer term will be a major task in the coming years. the well-documented restriction of information and control of communications complicates this task (office of the information commissioner of canada, 2010; the professional institute of the public service of canada, 2011; maher, 2011). but, such work will be pivotal in understanding how neoliberal policies, in the case of this government, are being practiced. we hope to have contributed in some small way to this dialogue. 13 as of april 25, 2011, thirty-five women’s organizations in canada have had federal funding significantly cut or ended all together (ad hoc coalition for women’s equality and human rights 2011). 54 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism references ad hoc coalition for women’s equality and human rights (2011). http:// www.womensequality.ca/ bagnall, j. (2011, june 10). afraid of 2012? remember the budget of 1995. the ottawa citizen. http://www.fcpp.org/publication.php/3797 baker, a. (1999). nebuleuse and the ‘internationalization of the state’ in the uk? the case of hm treasury and the bank of england. review of international political economy, 6(1), 79-100 bruno, j. (2012, february 27). the majority governing conservatives are having a difficult time deciding what to cut, what to keep, and where to reallocate the scarce funds. the hill times. http://www.hilltimes.com/ news/news/2012/02/27/expect-a%e2%80%98watershed%e2%80%99federal-budget-say-experts/29723 ccpa (2009). 2009 budget analysis. ottawa: canadian centre for policy alternative. cerny, p. g. (2004). mapping varieties of neoliberalism. paper prepared for presentation at the annual convention of the international studies association, montreal, québec, 17-20 march 2004 and the annual conference of the political studies association of the united kingdom, 6-8 april 2004. http://www.psa.ac.uk/cps/2004/cerny.pdf coen, d. & roberts, a. (2012). a new age of uncertainty. governance: an international journal of policy, administration, and institutions, 25(1) 5-9. corcoran, t. (2012, february 10). panda politics: it’s trickier than you think. national post. http://opinion.financialpost.com/2012/02/10/pandapolitics-its-trickier-thanyou-think/ de souza, m. (2012, april 6). quebec tories say stephen harper creating ‘winning conditions’ for referendum. postmedia news. http://lifestyle. topnewstoday.org/culture/article/1969375/ department of finance (2010). annual financial report of the government of canada fiscal year 2009–2010. http://www.fin.gc.ca/afr-rfa/2010/ report-rapport-eng.asp department of finance canada. (2007). strong leadership, a better canada: economic statement. ottawa: government of canada, october 30, 2007. department of finance canada. (2009). budget 2009: canada’s economic action plan backgrounder. ottawa: government of canada. http://www. fin.gc.ca/n08/09-011eng.asp doern, g.b., a.m. maslove and m.j. prince. (2013). canadian public budgeting in the age of crises. ottawa and kingston: mcgill-queens press. easterbrook, w.t. & watkins, m.h. (1984) the staple approach. in w.t easterbrook & m.h. watkins (eds.), approaches to canadian economic history (pp. 1–98). ottawa: carleton university press. crisis and opportunism | 55 evans, b. & albo, g. (2011). permanent austerity: the politics of the canadian exit strategy from fiscal stimulus. alternate routes: a journal of critical social research, 22, 7-28. fanelli, c. & hurl, c. (2011). janus-faced austerity: strengthening the ‘competitive’ canadian state. alternate routes: a journal of critical social research, 22, 29-50. fekete, f. (2012b, march 16) future of public service in hands of nine parliamentarians. postmedia news. retrieved september 30, 2012, from http://www2.canada.com/future+public+service+hands+nine+parliame ntarians/63 14885/story.html?id=6314885 fekete, j. (2012a, march 10). bureaucrats must shift to efficiency and constraint: clement. canada.com. http://www2.canada.com/topics/ news/story.html?id=6282995 galloway, g. (2012, march 5). spare veterans from budget axe, opposition says. globe and mail update. http://m.theglobeandmail.com/news/ politics/ottawanotebook/spare-veterans-from-budget-axe-opposition says/article2358967/?service=mobile galloway, g. (2011, november 29). after the tory witch-hunt against the cbc, who’ll be next? globe and mail. http://www.theglobeandmail.com/ arts/television/after-thetory-witch-hunt-against-the-cbc-wholl-benext/article4179574/ glavin, t. (2012, may 7). something’s fishy with bill c-38. national post. http://www2.canada.com/ottawacitizen/news/archives/story. html?id=cb8b39a4f566-4e5a-a5c9-f3431c0dd554 government of canada (2009, january 27). canada’s economic action plan. budget 2009, tabled in the house of commons by j.m. flaherty, p.c., m.p. minister of finance. government of canada (2010, march 4). canada’s economic action plan, year 2: leading the way on jobs and growth. budget 2010, tabled in the house of commons by j.m. flaherty, p.c., m.p. minister of finance. government of canada (2011). infrastructure stimulus fund. infrastructure canada. http://www.infrastructure.gc.ca/prog/other-autres-eng. html#isf-fsi government of canada (2012, november 11). jobs, growth and long term prosperity, economic action plan 2012: the budget in brief. department of finance. http://www.budget.gc.ca/2012/rd-dc/brief-bref-2012-eng. pdf gray, k. (2011, august 10). a defenseless economy. the ottawa citizen. http://blogs.ottawacitizen.com/2011/08/10/a-defenceless-economy/ harmes, a. (2007). the political economy of open federalism. canadian journal of political science, 40(2), 417-437. harvey, d. (2003). the new imperialism. oxford: oxford university press. 56 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism harvie, d. & milburn, k. (2011, august 4). the zombie of neoliberalism can be beaten – through mass direct action. the guardian. http://www. guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/aug/04/neoliberalism-zombie action-phone-hacking innis, h. (1956). essays in canadian economic history. toronto: university of toronto press. kipp, k. (2012, march 15). most disabled access projects going to tory ridings: documents. postmedia news. http://www. calgaryherald.com/business/most+disabled+access+projects+going+ tory+ridings+documents/6309515/story.html krugman, p. (2010, july 1). op ed column: myths of austerity. the new york times. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/02/opinion/02krugman. html maher, s. (2011, november 30). harper’s pr obsession fostering paranoia and paralysis in the public service. canada.com. http://www2. canada.com/news/maher+harper+obsession+fostering+paranoia+pa ralysis+public+service/5792000/story.html?id=5792000 may, k. (2012, march 14). budget won’t reveal details of ps cuts. the ottawa citizen. from http://www.ottawacitizen.com/opinion/oped/ budget+reveal+details+cuts+clement+says/6303389/story.html mackinnon, d. & shaw, j. (2010). new state spaces, agency and scale: devolution and the regionalisation of transport governance in scotland. antipode, 42(5), 1226-1252. nadeau, r. (2008, march 25). the economist has no clothes: unscientific assumptions in economic theory are undermining efforts to solve environmental problems. the scientific american. http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=the-economisthas-no-clothes nguyen, l. (2012, february 24). jim flaherty says there ‘shouldn’t be any tax increases’ in next budget. postmedia news. http://www.theguardian. pe.ca/business/201202-24/article-2906460/jim-flaherty-says-thereshouldnt-be-any-tax-increases-innext-budget/1 oecd [organisation for economic development and cooperation] (2011). making the most of public investment in a tight fiscal environment: multilevel governance lessons from the crisis. paris: oecd. office of the information commissioner of canada (2010). special report to parliament: interference with access to information requests. ottawa, ontario. peck, j. & tickell, a. (2002). neoliberalizing space. antipode, 34(3), 380–404. pm of canada (2006, march 21). prime minister promotes open federalism. office of the prime minister of canada. retrieved september 30, 2012, from http://pm.gc.ca/eng/media.asp?id=1123. crisis and opportunism | 57 public works and government services canada [pwgsc] (2010). public accounts of canada, volume ii, details of expenses and revenues. government of canada, prepared by the receiver general of canada. public works and government services canada [pwgsc] (2005). public accounts of canada, volume ii, details of expenses and revenues. government of canada, prepared by the receiver general of canada. public works and government services canada [pwgsc] (2006). public accounts of canada, volume ii, details of expenses and revenues. government of canada, prepared by the receiver general of canada. public works and government services canada [pwgsc] (2007). public accounts of canada, volume ii, details of expenses and revenues. government of canada, prepared by the receiver general of canada. public works and government services canada [pwgsc] (2008). public accounts of canada, volume ii, details of expenses and revenues. government of canada, prepared by the receiver general of canada. public works and government services canada [pwgsc] (2009). public accounts of canada, volume ii, details of expenses and revenues. government of canada, prepared by the receiver general of canada. public works and government services canada [pwgsc] (2011). public accounts of canada, volume ii, details of expenses and revenues. government of canada, prepared by the receiver general of canada. pugliese, d. (2012, march 9). opposition mps say they’ll now think twice about accepting canadian forces’ invitations. the ottawa citizen. http://www.ottawacitizen.com/news/opposition%20they%20 think%20twice%20ab out%20accepting%20canadian%20forces%20 invitations/6280032/story.html ruckert, a. (2006). towards an inclusive-neoliberal regime of development: from the washington to the post-washington consensus. labour, capital and society, 39(1), 34-67. ruckert, a. (2009). periodizing neoliberal development policy: from destructive ‘roll back’ and constructive ‘roll out’ to inclusive neoliberalism. paper presented at the annual convention of the canadian political science association reynolds, n. (2011, september 6). jim flaherty: the master of stealth austerity. the globe and mail. http://www.theglobeandmail.com/reporton-business/robcommentary/jim-flaherty-the-master-of-stealthausterity/article627118/ stiglitz, j. e. (2012). the price of inequity: how today’s divided society endangers our future, norton: ny. the professional institute of the public service of canada (2011, july 28). privy council muzzles canadian scientist. http://www.pipsc.ca/portal/ page/portal/website/news/newsreleases/news/072811 58 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism varro, k. (2010). re-politicising the analysis of ‘new state spaces’ in hungary and beyond: towards an effective engagement with ‘actually existing neoliberalism.’ antipode, 42(5), 1253-1278. veldhuis, n. & lammam, c. (2012), march 5. the chopping block: cut $10-billion now. national post. http://opinion.financialpost. com/2012/03/05/the-chopping-blockcut-10-billion-now/ wells, p. & mcmahon, t. (2012, april 2). oil power. maclean’s magazine, p.16. corcoran, t. (2012, march 6). the chopping block: opinion. national post. http://www.nationalpost.com/opinion/where+flaherty+begin/6255598/ story.html williams, b. & mcneill, j. m. (2005). the current crisis in neoclassical economics and the case for an economic analysis based on sustainable development. u21 global working paper, no. 001/2005. williamson, j. (1990). latin american adjustment: how much has happened? washington, d.c.: institute for international economics. woods, m. (2012, april 17). federal budget: critics blast ottawa’s plan to overhaul environmental review process. the star. http://www. thestar.com/news/canada/politics/article/1162871—tories-introduce sweeping-changes-to-environmental-assessments | 99 power, the state and global politics after the great freeze:towards a new articulation? randall germain1 introduction in the social sciences, scholarly disciplines can be prompted to re-evaluate the analytical traction of their central concepts by abrupt changes in how the object of their scholarship is organized. the disciplines of international relations (ir) and international political economy (ipe) have long faced such pressure. for example, some see the interwar years and the great depression as the precursor not only to the empirical development of american hegemony, but also as a key spur to the emergence of realism as a central method of apprehending power (carr, 1946; schmidt, 1998; cox, 2000). several decades later, scholars took the breakdown of the bretton woods system as a prompt both to re-evaluate the utility of realism as a theoretical lens for ir and ipe, and as a signal that the post-war structure of the global political economy was itself entering a period of ‘after hegemony’, to use the title of a significant text from that era (keohane and nye, 1977; keohane, 1984). this last debate over american decline of power was seemingly resolved in the closing years of the 20th century, amid the aftermath of the end of the cold war, the collapse of the soviet union and the re-assertion of american power (cox, 2001). the uni-polar era had arrived even as governance was becoming increasingly globalized (scholte, 2000; ikenberry, mastanduno and wohlforth, 2009). the financial crisis of 2007-2009 has brought this paradoxical resolution into question. the central features of the crisis include both domestic and international dynamics: regulatory failure among leading 1  randall germain is professor and chair of the department of political science at carleton university (ottawa, canada). he is the author of global politics and financial governance and the international organization of credit: states and global finance in the world-economy. he can be reached at: randall_germain@carleton.ca power, the state and global politics after the great freeze: towards a new articulation? 100 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times financial powers (most critically the united states (u.s.) but others as well); financial innovation among banks, investment banks and nonbank financial institutions that built up significant systemic risk; macroeconomic imbalances at the global level that included trade and capital account disequilibria alongside currency misalignments; inappropriate monetary policies; high sovereign debt loads; and ultimately massive institutional failure. i have elsewhere labelled this crisis the great freeze, because one of its principal consequences was a steady constriction of credit markets from the summer of 2007 that ultimately resulted in a near total blockage–or flash freeze–after lehman brothers went bust in september 2008 (germain, 2010). the twelve months following this spectacular bankruptcy saw the harshest contraction of global economic activity since the worst days of the great depression. indeed, 2009 is the only year since 1945 that the global economy as a whole has been in recession (imf, 2009). this article uses this crisis as the occasion to explore the changing global articulation of power. power in ir and ipe is usually viewed in relational terms, as the ability to effect change in actor’s behaviour, where actor a gets actor b to do what it might not otherwise would (baldwin, 2002; schmidt, 2005). power here is understood as the capacity–derived most often from control over material capabilities that translate into instruments of pressure–of one actor to influence (directly or indirectly) the decisions of another actor. in contrast, i deploy an understanding of power that is more structural in orientation, derived from the work of susan strange, who argues that it is the structural determinants of power that are more important to understand than the relational determinants (strange, 1988b). on this basis, strange disagreed with those who, in the mid-1980s, viewed the global political economy to be entering a period marked by american decline (strange, 1987). the argument i advance below takes it cue from her framework to argue that the new global articulation of power suggested by the great freeze is both highly fluid and relatively opaque or ambiguous. this is so because even as some key structural determinants of power have become hollowed out, other elements remain intact while yet more have yet to emerge fully. the result will be a period of struggle waged around and through the principal organizational pillars of the global political economy for control over the very foundations of political order. the outcome of this struggle will not be resolved any time soon. | 101 power, the state and global politics the idea that we can measure power in global politics has long been attractive to scholars, even as they have acknowledged the immense difficulties of the task (knorr, 1975; kirshner, 1995; hardt and negri, 2000; andrews, 2006). here i wish to follow the british ipe scholar susan strange in asking how changes in the structural determinants of power help us to understand select contemporary trends. strange developed her understanding of power against prevailing views, largely american in origin, that saw in the 1980s a sharp and steep decline in the ability of the u.s. to shape the international economic order. at the time, ir and ipe scholars were concerned primarily with the ability of the u.s. to compel its long-time allies to follow american preferences and accommodate themselves to american interests as they had for much of the bretton woods period. from across the theoretical spectrum, this was most often articulated as the erosion of international regimes, whose main cause was a decline in american power (block ,1977; gilpin, 1981; krasner, 1983). in contrast, strange argued that such measurements of american power were at the very least inaccurate, and at worst entirely misleading (strange, 1983; 1987). she noted that even as the share of american gross domestic product (gdp) in relation to global gdp had declined, the control of american corporations over key international markets remained high and was even (in certain industries such as services) growing. for strange, the key question was not the weight of the american economy in the global economy, but the control exerted by american corporations and lawmakers over global markets (strange, 1988; cf nizan and bichler, 2009). here she pointed out that this control was not under threat from global competition; in fact, global competition was defined and shaped inexorably by the demands, preferences and resources of american corporations. in short, the structure of global competition was determined (or controlled) by american interests, even if these interests were themselves no longer expressly related to the territorial borders of the u.s. she sometimes styled these interests in the form of a ‘transnational’ or ‘american’ empire’ (strange, 1988b; 1989). it was this structural capacity to control the global economic agenda which counted in the power sweepstakes, not where widgets were actually produced. and such power at its heart was constituted by a complicated amalgam of public and private authority. at one level, for strange, the global articulation of power in the 1980s was constituted by an iron triangle of inordinate (american) military power, an inter-state system that refracted and radiated america’s govpower, the state and global politics after the great freeze: towards a new articulation? 102 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times ernmental power throughout its most important elements, and the dominance of an ideational framework that privileged american principles and ideals. here strange disagreed with two of the strongest proponents of the argument that america was no longer ascendant. from a realist perspective, robert gilpin argued that american power, measured as its ability to compel its allies to make contributions to the pax americana, was in terminal decline (gilpin, 1981). and from a critical historical materialist perspective, robert cox argued that the u.s. was no longer able to direct a hegemonic structure of world order (cox, 1987). both gilpin and cox, albeit for quite different reasons, pointed to the inability of the u.s. to fashion consensus or accommodate its allies’ needs as part of the negotiations necessary to maintain a benevolent (from an american point of view) global economic system. for them, a neo-liberal (or hyper-liberal, to use the term initially coined by cox) world signalled the end of american dominance. strange had a different answer to the question of american decline, relying instead on a careful distinction between relational and structural power. relational power was of course above all about the u.s. being able to coerce or compel its allies and competitors to undertake particular courses of action. here she acknowledged that this form of power waxed and waned with global economic circumstances, and was entirely dependent upon very specific and particular contexts. on this reading, from the early 1970s until the late 1980s it did appear that u.s. relational power was in retreat. the instrumental capacity of the u.s. to exert its willpower seemed to have eroded, or at the very least to be under severe stress.2 however, what was significant for strange’s counter-intuitive analysis was the capacity of some states to set the rules by which others would have to play the ‘great power’ game. in other words, for strange the key to understanding who actually ‘had’ power lay not in determining who could prevail in specific decisions, but who could set the rules by which such decisions were made in the first place (strange, 1988b). in her estimation at the time, it was still american political leaders who had it within their grasp to provide such leadership. even though not all decisions went america’s way, they were made under american rules that reflected american interests. this social fact also called attention to the global reach of american domestic political conflicts, which had a disproportionate impact on international regulatory developments. beyond 2  for strange, however, this decline in relational power was predominantly caused by u.s. domestic politics, by an inability on the part of the american political system to organize itself effectively so as to project and use its (structural) power appropriately (strange, 1987). | 103 this, there were also some decisions that were simply not taken because the u.s. in effect blocked the way; such ‘non-decisions’ as she called them were also the product of american structural power (strange, 1986). in strange’s view, this ability to set the rules derived from several sources, some public or state-centred and some centred more in the operation of the (capitalist) economic system. the american state still maintained a considerable military edge over its closest rivals, which was bolstered by the continued reluctance of european states to devote adequate resources to defending themselves. but equally importantly, american corporations continued to dominate transnational production systems, which were a principal source of high value profits. the superior innovative capacities of these firms, bolstered by statesponsored military research, bestowed onto certain segments of america’s ‘private’ economy an unalloyed competitive advantage. as well, american ideas about how to organize economic activity (and its associated set of political values and ideals) complemented these advantages, and held a global appeal. and finally, and for her critically, the u.s. (through its government, its markets and its private institutions) had a lock-grip over the organization and operation of the world’s monetary and financial system (strange, 1987; 1988; cf may, 1996). for strange, all that was required for america to actually exercise its structural power was a willingness to act politically in a manner congruent with its underlying power capacities.3 this understanding of power ties together the capacity of the state with the operation of private institutions and the inter-state system to provide for strange a structural reading that suggests where power actually resides in the global political economy. because power is about the capacity to decide agendas, it is not directly related to the ability of a to compel b to undertake a particular course of action; rather, it is related to the context of agency, which has two levels: (1) the capacity of a to convince b that its menu of choice involves x, y and z and nothing else; and (2) the capacity of a to influence this menu of choice either directly, through its own ability to compel the acceptance of the menu, or indirectly, because the majority of the elements of the menu remain in a dependent relationship to a. this kind of power, which she called structural power, belonged as a property to the u.s. throughout the period of supposed american decline. to highlight the exercise of such power, strange (1988b) considered the example of the international debt crisis of the early 1980s, when several countries ran into significant debt repayment problems. instruc3  by the end of her life, strange had finally concluded that the u.s. was in fact unwilling to act in a manner congruent with its own ‘structural’ interests (strange, 1998). power, the state and global politics after the great freeze: towards a new articulation? 104 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times tively for her, only those countries with close ties to the u.s. were able to work towards a resolution that involved creditors booking losses on their assets within the framework of an overall imf-sanctioned debt recovery scheme. crucially, it was the u.s. which was able to dictate these rules of engagement, and it was these rules which all indebted countries had to follow if they wanted debt relief on a multilateral scale. american power here was omnipresent but structural, reflecting its pole position within the inter-state system rather than a calculated exploitation of its own instrumental power. strange’s view of structural power–and indeed power in general–is not of course without problems, many of which are connected to her idiosyncratic view of theory in ir and ipe. some of these are noted in a volume dedicated to engaging with the corpus and legacy of her work (lawton, rosenau and verdun, 2000). we could, for example, take her to task for developing taxonomies rather than theoretical insights (cohen, 2000); for not working through the tension in her work between materialism and idealism (guzzini, 2000); for failing to overcome the de facto analytical barriers between economics and politics (cutler, 2000); and for refusing to socialize adequately her fundamentally empiricist reading of knowledge, ideology and ultimately power itself (tooze, 2000). what these critiques of strange’s view on power suggest is that she offers an insightful but yet truncated conception of power, which only partially connects the foundations of power to the way in which it is exercised. most importantly, strange seems oddly reluctant to reflect theoretically on her insights, and determined to restrict her theoretical reflections to the terrain of empirical falsification. this is perhaps due to her ambiguous acceptance of the place of positivism within the social sciences, and to her ultimate unwillingness to modify its evidence-based evaluative precepts (may, 1996; palan, 1999; cutler, 2000; tooze, 2000). even with these caveats, however, her conception of structural power offers a useful framework to consider how the global articulation of power has been affected by the great freeze. this is because it directs our attention to two key developments: (1) the changing role of the state in regulating financial markets; and (2) the rise of emerging market economies and their new role in setting the agenda of global economic decision-making. on both counts, what emerges from such a consideration is a recognition that established patterns of decision-making are unravelling, even if new patterns have yet to be firmly established. each development will be reviewed below. | 105 power and the state: financial regulation the key authorities involved in global financial regulation are american and european officials together with their counterparts in international regulatory institutions. this should not be surprising, as historically these states sit astride the world’s deepest and most liquid financial markets. what is noteworthy from the perspective of considering the effects of the great freeze is to observe how systematically these states are moving forward to intervene more forcefully in the operation of financial markets under their jurisdiction. states are renewing their authority to set the agenda of global finance. in the u.s., two major directions of change are developing: in the organization and logic of supervision; and in the range and extent of supervision. each of these regulatory changes will increase the degree of state intervention in its financial system, and thereby encourage other states to intervene more forcefully in their financial systems. the first major change concerns the organization of financial supervision and in particular the question of whether such supervision should be sectoral or unified in scope and scale. while the u.s. may be an extreme case with its plethora of financial regulatory bodies, the logic of sectoral supervision has a considerable historical record (russell, 2008).4 the great freeze has brought into sharp relief how problematic such a fragmented regulatory apparatus is when set within the context of an integrated set of financial markets. here the great freeze has unquestionably tipped the balance in favour of a more strongly unified supervisory framework. in the u.s., the obama administration’s efforts to recalibrate u.s. financial regulation have resulted in the passage of the dodd-frank bill, which among other things identifies the federal reserve board (fed) as the principal overseer of systemic risk. a combined council of regulators will further close many of the remaining gaps within the u.s. system. equally important are new powers given to regulators to wind-up insolvent firms, and to compel banks to limit or restrict their proprietary treading units under the so-called volcker rule. this rule prescribes how banks are to capitalize their special investment vehicles, and how much they are allowed 4  financial markets have historically been differentiated by the kinds of instruments that comprise them and their institutional makeup. regulation has evolved in line with how these markets operate and what kinds of products they generate. this has traditionally been understood in terms of key pillars, most importantly banking, equities, insurance and pensions. almost everywhere each pillar has spawned its own regulatory apparatus, together with a few more recent developments such as organized futures markets. see germain (2010) and porter (2005) for an historical account. power, the state and global politics after the great freeze: towards a new articulation? 106 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times to invest in hedge funds and private equity firms. together with the vetting powers which the new consumer protection agency will have for financial instruments, the dodd-frank bill will push the government to cast a much heavier footprint over the organization and operation of the american financial system.5 a heavier footprint is also taking shape in europe, where british and e.u. authorities are moving to give the state a much stronger presence within their respective financial systems. in the u.k., a major reorganization of financial supervision has been undertaken to strip the financial services authority of its supervisory role and to relocate it within the bank of england.6 this has been further supported by the recommendations made by an independent commission struck by the new british government to examine how to strengthen the british financial system in light of the great freeze (economist 2011: april 16th–22nd). this commission–known as the vickers’ commission–has recommended that british banks organize themselves to insulate or ring fence their domestic u.k. retail arms from their investment and commercial banking operations. in other words, the (british) state looks set to intervene more forcefully in how financial institutions active in the u.k. are actually run. similar albeit weaker trajectories are underway in the e.u.7 of course, none of these developments have yet to be fully implemented as of the time of writing of this manuscript, and there are some who doubt that their impact will be as argued here. such scepti5  other provisions in the ‘wall street reform and consumer protection act’ include bringing all major financial institutions–whether bank or non-bank–within the purview of federal regulation, more closely regulating derivatives trading and hedge funds, limiting the proprietary trading prerogatives of banks, and providing the federal government with a more clearly specified way of closing down insolvent financial institutions. see http://www. opencongress.org/bill/111-h4173/show (accessed august 6th, 2010). 6  among the proposals published by the british government in july 2010 were to return both macroand microprudential supervisory responsibilities to the bank of england, and to create a new consumer protection agency to absorb the institutional responsibilities of the financial services authority (which will effectively be gutted). these proposals arise out of the turner review–the official enquiry into how the uk’s supervisory arrangements failed to contain the fallout from the great freeze–as well as the political preferences of the conservative and liberal-democrat partners in the new coalition government. see http:// www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/other/turner_review.pdf (accessed may 04, 2009) and http://www. hm-treasury.gov.uk/consult_financial_regulation.htm (accessed august 06, 2010). 7  the e.u. struck a high-level committee to examine the crisis and how to respond to it, chaired by jacques de larosière, a former managing director of the imf who also played a leading role in preparing the e.u. for monetary union. in addition to proposing e.u.-wide risk and supervisory councils, this panel recommended reviewing accounting standards and basel ii (especially its capital adequacy requirements), tighter regulation of derivatives trading and the shadow banking system, and the harmonization of deposit insurance schemes on an e.u.-wide basis. see http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/finances/docs/ de_larosiere_report_en.pdf (accessed on july 29, 2009). | 107 cism however should be treated with caution, for two reasons. first, across europe and the u.s., banks have been recapitalized and are being forced to hold much more capital in relation to their lending and proprietary operations than prior to 2008. swiss banks, for example, are being compelled by their government to hold nearly 20% capital buffers whereas prior to 2008 they were capitalized at nearer to 7%.8 the british and dutch governments are arguing strenuously with the e.u. that they should be allowed to impose higher capital requirements than the new basel iii rules. here, minimum tier 1 capital ratios are being raised from a pre-crisis requirement of 4% to at least 7%, with a further tranche of easily accessible capital at 3%. furthermore, somewhere between 20 and 30 globally-active financial institutions are about to be categorized by the basel committee on banking supervision as ‘systemically important financial institutions’, or sifis, which will need to hold extra capital buffers above and beyond normal operating guidelines of between 1.5-2.5%, due to their perceived systemic importance. no one should doubt that increased capital ratios, which influence how much banks can lend, are on the way, and that these will have an impact on banking operations. it is through the mechanism of increased capital ratios that major banks are having their activities more closely supervised, and similar consequences are in train for other regulatory developments.9 the second reason why sceptics should be cautious relates to the politics of financial regulation. for much of the post-war period, financial regulation in the rich economies has been debated and conducted in a kind of segregated, insulated bubble, removed for the most part from popular (and democratic) pressures (helleiner, 1994; strange, 1998; porter, 2005; wood, 2005; germain, 2010). this is no longer the case. from the tea party phenomenon in the u.s. to the role played by populist and nationalist political parties in scandinavia in addressing the 2010-2011 european debt crisis to the refusal of icelandic voters to sanction an imf bailout, financial supervision and the politics of finance have moved to centre stage in national politics. and while this development has yet to fully play itself out, all indications are that the relatively insulated nature of financial politics has for the moment become impossible to maintain (thirkwell-white, 2009). 8  see http://online.wsj.com/article/sb10001424052748704631504575531222507779044.html (accessed october 15, 2010). 9  a summary of the basel iii can be found at http://www.bis.org/press/p100912.htm (accessed october 15, 2010). power, the state and global politics after the great freeze: towards a new articulation? 108 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times and yet a word of caution is in order. the state that is at the centre of this reassertion of authority is not itself entirely distinct from private authority. in all three jurisdictions examined here, private financial institutions have over the 1990s won a strengthened degree of involvement in the debate over how the financial system should be regulated. in the u.s. this is because of the porous and fragmented nature of the american political system, which has long been open to lobbying efforts from private firms. in the u.k. this is because of the historic ties between the city, the exchequer and the bank of england, and the single-minded determination of successive governments to maintain london’s role as a leading international financial centre. and in the e.u., although the influence of the private sector is not as strong as in the u.s. or u.k., it has grown over the years due to the sheer increase in the weight of financial affairs in the overall economy of europe, as well as the organizational efforts of europe’s leading banks to lobby on their own behalf in brussels (underhill and zhang, 2008; king and sinclair, 2003). geoffrey underhill (2000) is surely correct to note that there is a growing condominium between state and market in today’s global political economy. here, it is helpful to follow susan strange’s understanding of the intimate relationship between public and private forms of authority, as she recognizes that this relationship is part of a continuum whose balance changes over time. in her last major publication, she argued that markets and private authority had outrun state authority to the point where only an almost complete collapse of confidence in the capacity of private authority to effectively organize global finance could catalyze state authorities to reassert their traditional grip on financial systems (strange, 1998, p. 190). this collapse came upon us in 2008, when it fell to public authorities alone to stem the tide, which was estimated by one respected analyst to cost nearly us$14 trillion (haldane and alessandri, 2009). so, while the precise nature of the new balance between public and private authority has yet to be stabilized, there should be no questions about the direction of change: in each of the world’s major financial markets, the role of the state is being up-scaled, with the result that state authority is being re-articulated to exert more structural power over how financial markets are organized. we may say that the agenda-setting capacity of the state has been re-asserted over financial markets, even if this reassertion is uneven and subject to private sector push-back. | 109 power and the state system: emerging market economies and the balance of power many scholars and commentators have observed that global politics, understood primarily through the lens of the inter-state system, has been in a period of transformation (e.g. jacques, 2009; halliday, 2009). on the debit side of this ledger is the weakening grip of western powers, symbolized by the economic troubles of the u.s. on the credit side of this ledger are the emerging market economies, symbolized most importantly by the rise of the bric countries but including other non-g7 countries whose economies and international profiles have been growing rapidly. for these countries the early years of the 21st century have at last brought dynamic economic growth and public sector reform that has enabled them to acquire the material vestiges of real power: their economies have hummed; their trade has skyrocketed; their companies have gone global; their reserves have been bolstered; and their armies have become better equipped. in short, enough emerging market and other non-g-7 economies have grown in relation to the historically-powerful countries that talk of a new and emerging international balance of power is warranted. following from our earlier analysis, however, we can ask whether scholars are not committing the same analytical error that strange reprimanded her peers for making over two decades ago? a critical example is the accumulation of international reserves by the bric countries, which is often considered a key barometer of the growing power of emerging market economies. for strange, this would be a clear example of how structural power works, because the stockpiling of foreign currency reserves denominated in u.s. dollars confirms three important features of american structural power: (1) america still has the world’s confidence as the pre-eminent provider of global liquidity; (2) there are at this time no serious rivals to accumulating and using u.s. dollars as an international reserve currency, even if those accumulating such reserves complain about the injustice of it; and (3) whereas bric and other countries have to earn their liquidity (which are what such reserves represent), america can simply create its liquidity. it is hard to think of a better indicator of structural power than this, what strange (1987, p. 569) in her own time called super-exorbitant privilege. nevertheless, since 2009 chinese officials (often but not always supported by other bric countries) have stepped up calls for the development of a non-dollar-denominated international reserve currency unit. what would be needed for such a development to occur? on the governpower, the state and global politics after the great freeze: towards a new articulation? 110 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times ment side, it would require holders of large dollar-denominated reserves to make their own currencies completely convertible in order to allow for their use abroad as trade and investment vehicles. in other words, emerging market economies such as china, russia, india and brazil need to liberalize their current and capital accounts to the point where others will have the necessary confidence to diversify into these currencies and use them as genuine reserve currencies. as these governments tighten their hold on undesired movements of capital into and out of their economies (as indeed many emerging market economies are doing), such a possibility seems more remote today than at any time in the past twenty years.10 indeed, one only has to look back to the experience of japan during the 1980s and its antipathy towards internationalizing the yen to understand the deep political forces that constrain governments which otherwise might challenge existing reserve currencies.11 but on the private or market side of the equation the forces supporting the continuing use of the u.s. dollar are equally powerful. private firms and market actors demand not just that governments relinquish control over currencies in order that they may be used for purposes dictated by the interests of private accumulation, but also that there be ample liquidity in order that the temporary use of a currency (as a store of value, for example) does not become a permanent and unwanted longterm investment. for this condition to obtain, governments need to adopt a liberal view of their currencies, most importantly by freeing their use abroad and by abjuring their use as a developmental tool. there also needs to be an adequate supply of the currency in question. absent suitable liberalization and an ample supply, private firms and markets will not have the confidence to use a currency (or facilitate its use), and will therefore minimize how they employ it. 10  over the past two years, countries including china, south korea, singapore, brazil and turkey have joined russia and india to implement controls on the inflow of capital as an important tool in the battle to protect their economies from currency appreciation and, to a lesser extent, over-heating. these controls are now supported by the imf, which has shifted its long-standing blanket opposition to capital controls. see for example http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/11/business/global/11capital.html?_r=1&ref=business (accessed december 5, 2010). 11  the basic problem faced by a country possessing an international reserve currency is that it loses its ability to hold onto direct control of its exchange rate, and thereby the ability to use its currency as a developmental tool. by its very nature an international reserve currency is widely dispersed and intensely traded, and this compromises the ability of its issuing government to control its value. of course, there are significant advantages to the issuer of an international reserve currency, most importantly the ability to fund its government’s activities cheaply because of the international demand for its government bonds (which are the chief component of international reserves). to most developing and emerging market countries, however, the benefits of issuing a reserve currency are far outweighed by the disadvantages, hence their reluctance to allow their currency to act as such. | 111 and this is where we are in 2011 with respect to the future of the american dollar as an international reserve currency. many countries (and not just bric countries) are uncomfortable with the international role of the u.s. dollar. by making it cheap for the u.s. to fund its budgetary and current account deficits (what economists often call seigniorage), using the dollar as the international reserve currency retards the adjustment process the u.s. needs to undertake to bring its trade, current and capital accounts into a more sustainable balance. it also prolongs the vulnerability other countries experience with respect to having to follow or react to america’s monetary policies. yet, the world is not rushing out to adopt the rouble or the rupee or the yuan as reserve currencies, simply because they cannot. and neither can they freely use the pound sterling, japanese yen, swiss franc or, most significantly, the euro. there are simply not enough of the former to be thrust into this role, while the political mismatch between the issuance of euro-denominated debt and who controls its value ultimately means that an enormous question mark hangs over precisely how robust an international role the euro can play. by default, the dollar will be required for use as an international reserve currency until well into the middle decades of the 21st century.12 so, the accumulation of a mountain of u.s. dollar-denominated reserve assets by bric and other countries such as japan does not prima facie indicate the decline of american power. in relational terms, to return to susan strange’s argument, it may indeed appear that the u.s. now has serious rivals to its monetary power. however, in structural terms, its challengers are hobbled by the framework of practices that have developed over the past decades that have been entirely cantered on american interests and needs. the u.s. has held a firm grasp on monetary and financial power since 1945, and this has allowed it to build up 12 the problems of the euro zone in 2010-11 have clarified how significant the political mismatch is in europe, possibly dealing a fatal blow to a global role for the euro. two developments could conceivably undermine the future role of the u.s. dollar. one development might be a genuine budgetary (and therefore political) crisis in the u.s., involving both default and devaluation. if this happens all bets are off. the august 2011 downgrade u.s. debt by standard and poor’s sets up an interesting confrontation between the u.s. government and american credit rating agencies in this respect, but it is difficult to see quite what the practical outcome of this move will be, since a large part of these agencies’ role in the global financial system derives in part from their explicit (american) government sanctioned role in rating government and private debt (sinclair 2005). moreover, it is difficult to identify america’s budgetary woes as a ‘debt’ problem when in fact its effective tax rate is less than 25% of gdp, well below the oecd average of 35%. the other development might be the development of sdrs into a kind of proper international reserve currency. even if this were to happen it would still not address the needs of private firms and market actors for an internationally-tradable currency, which an sdr is most manifestly not. international reserve currencies need to be accepted and used by both public and private agents; this accounts for how difficult they are to establish as well as why they take so long to fade. power, the state and global politics after the great freeze: towards a new articulation? 112 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times an historic reservoir of influence and power that will not be easily dislodged.13 yet, the balance of economic power has not been entirely static over the post-war era, and even though american firms and indeed the american government together constitute a significant element of the world’s monetary and financial system, they are not as ubiquitous an element as they once were. the u.s. has been to a certain extent decentred from the structure of financial governance over the past decade and a half, so that even though it is still an immensely powerful actor it must now negotiate the framework of this structure with other actors and their concerns (germain, 2010). it is this political fact which marks out the salience of current governance developments, where the interaction of international political relations with the demands of regulatory change are generating a set of issues whose importance is both novel and potentially long-lasting. structural power and political order two important sets of long-term structural consequences have been set in motion. one set of consequences revolves around the role of the state in the global financial system. as states–in both the developed and developing economies–move to re-calibrate how they intervene in the organization and operation of financial systems, their centrality within the globalized structure of financial governance will grow. the nationstate is not simply important here because it is the instrument through which all regulation actually gets implemented. even more critically, it is the only institution which can generate financial regulation that is appropriate and suitable for its own economy. emerging market economies–and the bric countries in particular–will here take their cue from what the u.s. and e.u. states actually do to impose tighter regulations on financial institutions; a slightly less globalized financial system is most likely to be the outcome. this is so because higher capital requirements, more capital controls and more tightly circumscribed operating environments will inevitably generate a global financial system less hospitable 13  many of the themes canvassed in the above paragraphs can be found also in a recent volume on the future of the u.s. dollar (helleiner and kirshner, 2009). interestingly, the experts in that volume agree to disagree on the future of the dollar. | 113 to what i elsewhere describe as deep globalization.14 this does not mean that globalization as we know it is coming to an end, merely that there will be less of it going forward. we will move from a highly globalized world to a world in which the pull of the nation-state away from deep globalization is more clearly felt. intersecting with the strengthening of the state is the second set of consequences, namely the refashioning of the inter-state balance of power. we have seen how this works in terms of the role of the u.s. dollar as an international reserve currency: its role is being eroded and brought into question, yet with no alternative in sight. in other words, one of the critical foundations of political order for the global political economy is entering a period of intense uncertainty. we have not witnessed such a situation since the inter-war period. strange might have observed here that the structural power of the u.s. is changing only very slowly, while its instrumental power to shape decisions directly is increasingly haphazard, reflecting the volatility of circumstances (including significantly an increasingly unstable domestic political landscape). what is especially important at the current moment, however, is that the global economic decision-making agenda does not yet appear to have ceded substantial power to emerging market economies, despite for example their accumulation of enormous reserves of u.s. dollars. structural power remains asymmetrically concentrated in american institutions and subject to american rules. how much longer will this remain so? if we return to strange’s conceptual formulation of structural power, we can recall that it relied on american military dominance, the continuing dominance of american ideals and values, and the place of american financial institutions, markets and government in the global financial system. if these fundamental elements of the global political order become further constrained or even undermined, then those adopting strange’s position would have to concede that the structural power of the u.s. is weakening. what is the status of these elements of global political order? the u.s. continues to outspend the rest of the world combined on defence, and it continues to be the only state with the military capacity 14  deep globalization here refers to the intensity of liberalization efforts which have driven economic growth since the end of the bretton woods era in the early 1980s. globalization– understood as increasing levels of economic integration among major economies together with the emergence of a global political consensus organized around neo-liberal principles– has been sustained by the global reach of liberalization, and it is precisely this which is coming unstuck as a consequence of the great freeze. this theme is explored below and in some detail in germain (2010: ch. 6). power, the state and global politics after the great freeze: towards a new articulation? 114 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times to fight a two-front war. yet, its military might is no longer unrivalled, and the build up of military assets by china could be viewed by some as a significant challenge. but it must be acknowledged that the only potential military rival to the u.s. is china, and so long as european states continue to rely disproportionally on american security via nato it is unlikely that the military dominance of the u.s. will collapse any time soon. while the idea of a uni-polar moment may be overstating the case, we are in many respects well short of a genuine multi-polar inter-state system (ikenberry, mastanduno and wohlfarth, 2009). what should be of more concern to scholars of global power is the condition of american values and ideals, which support in so many ways the entrenched american-centred global economic agenda. here it is interesting that one of the consequences of the great freeze has been the severe questioning of liberalization as the default ideational template for global capitalism. there are still no serious alternatives to organizing the global economy along capitalist lines. what has changed, however, is the degree to which capitalism needs to be organized along liberal (or neo-liberal) lines. here liberalization as an ethos is now subject to two important charges: (1) it is unsustainable as a form of economic regulation; and (2) that state-organized capitalism is in fact more stable than liberal capitalism. and while neither of these charges are categorical or themselves without controversy, they have undermined the persuasive power of liberalization’s ideologues to spread their gospel. from europe to asia to latin america and africa, liberalism is in retreat, and this has undermined the ideational supports for the operationalization of american structural power. finally, the great freeze began in the u.s. financial system, even if it was aided and abetted by global forces and dynamics. has it also challenged the centrality of the american financial system to the global financial system? this question is difficult to assess at this moment in time. on one hand, even with the carnage wreaked by the great freeze, american financial markets remain the deepest and most liquid in the world. and while american banks and financial institutions no longer remain the world’s largest by many ratios, they continue to be among the most profitable and innovative, and equally important they continue to provide unparalleled access for foreigners to american capital markets. their centrality to the organization and operation of the global financial system will not soon disappear. and because both u.s. markets and financial institutions remain key components of the global financial system, so too does the american government. its image and halo may | 115 be tarnished and dented, but it continues to possess a definite and considerable weight in how the global financial system runs. this sets up an interesting scholarly debate between those, like myself, who now emphasize the extent of change in the landscape of global political economy, and those who remain impressed by the continuity of capitalist relations as the key factor that explains current trajectories. at one level this is a debate about the relative weight to assign to competing explanatory variables: are we focusing on state versus class; public versus private; or global versus national? at another level it is about the grounds of adjudication: does more regulatory control also mean that state authorities are somehow in ascendancy, when in fact the dividing line between public and private authority may be impossible to identify? and at still another level, it is about the means used to understand and verify the categories we are using: do we appeal to ‘evidence’ or ‘theory’ (‘beliefs’?) when it comes to establishing the fundamental basis of our arguments? there are no easy or clear answers to these questions; thus such debates will long maintain their traction. yet here again it is worthwhile to return to the work of susan strange, for she offers at the very least a way of negotiating some of the hurdles thrown up by these debates. for strange, who understood that there were several ways of apprehending all important events, the question of the significance of current changes would need to be addressed within the context of cui bono, or for whose advantage? this context almost always provides a clear causal chain to follow, even if the measurement of ‘advantage’ can be a bit messy. in the case of changes to financial regulation, it appears that the biggest beneficiaries of higher capital requirements, increased capital controls and less liberalization are states in general and major developed states in particular, because it is they who will have to spend less to bail out their financial institutions if regulatory reforms are successful. of course, private financial institutions should also benefit from these reforms, but the weight of advantage lies with states. similarly, the unevenness of the changes outlined above regarding the inter-state balance of power, while not directly challenging the structural power of the u.s., certainly begin to undermine the ideational core of that power. over time, this will have the effect of eroding from within the dominant position of the u.s. in the global political economy. it is for these reasons that i can argue that the global articulation of power within the global political economy is entering a period of power, the state and global politics after the great freeze: towards a new articulation? 116 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times uncertainty as established patterns of power erode and new patterns emerge unevenly. there is no question that the relational power of the u.s. is eroding: firms from emerging market economies are challenging american firms in some areas, while the ability of the u.s. state to dictate its preferences onto a pliant world no longer holds. at the same time, the agenda setting ability of american authorities, both public and private, has not entirely deteriorated, and in some areas remains substantial. this is what continues to generate america’s continuing structural power. the interesting aspect of this situation, from the perspective of scholars of ir and ipe, will be how it plays out over the medium term, when the economic and security capabilities of the u.s. seem to be moving in opposite directions. the prediction i would make in late 2011 is that as nation-states reassert their authority over their financial systems and intervene to blunt the advance of globalization, the entire fabric of the global political economy is becoming rebalanced, ushering in a new inter-state balance of power and a new era in the history of global politics that is no longer centrally defined by the hegemonic position of the u.s. references andrews, david m., (ed). (2006). international monetary power. ithaca: cornell university press. baldwin, david. (2002). “power and international relations,” in walter carlsnaes, thomas risse and beth a. simmons (eds.), handbook of international relations. london: sage. block, fred. (1977). the origins of international economic disorder. berkeley: university of california press. carr, e.h. (1946). the twenty years crisis. london: macmillan. cox, michael (ed.) (2000). e .h . carr: a critical appraisal. basingstoke: palgrave. ___________. (2001). “whatever happened to american decline? international relations and the new united states hegemony,” new political economy, 6 (3), 311-340. cutler, a. clair. (2000). “theorizing the ‘no-man’s-land’ between politics and economics,” in lawton, rosenau and verdun (2000). economist. london: various dates. germain, randall. (2010). global politics and financial governance. basingstoke: palgrave. gilpin, robert. (1981). war and change in world politics. princeton: princeton university press. | 117 ____________. (1987). the political economy of international relations. princeton: princeton university press. guzzini, stefano. (2000). “strange’s oscillating realism: opposing the idealand the apparent,” in lawton, rosenau and verdun (2000). haldane, andrew and piergiorgio alessandri. (2009). “banking on the state,” bis review, no. 139. accessed at www.bis.org/review/r091111e. pdf on november 17 2009. halliday, fred. (2009). “international relations in a post-hegemonic age,” international affairs, vol. 85, no.1: 37-51. hardt, michael and antonio negri. (2000). empire cambridge: harvard university press. helleiner, eric. (1994). states and the re-emergence of global finance. ithaca: cornell university press. ____________ and jonathan kirshner (eds.). (2009). the future of the dollar. ithaca: cornell university press. ikenberry, john g., michael mastanduno and william c. wohlforth. (2009). “unipolarity, state behaviour and systemic consequences,” world politics, vol. 61, no. 3: 1-27. imf. 2009 world economic outlook, july. washington: international monetary fund. jacques, martin. (2009). when china rules the world: the end of the western world and the birth of a new global order. london: penguin press. keohane, robert o. (1984). after hegemony: cooperation and discord in the world political economy. princeton: princeton university press. keohane, robert o. and joseph s. nye, jr. (1977). power and interdependence: world politics in transition. boston: little, brown. king, michael r. and timothy j. sinclair. (2003). “private actors and public policy: a requiem for the new basle capital accord,” international political science review, vol. 24, no. 3: 345-62. kirshner, jonathan. (1995). currency and coercion: the political economy of international monetary power. princeton: princeton university press. knorr, klaus. (1975). the power of nations: the political economy of international relations. new york: basic books. krasner, stephen (ed.). (1983). international regimes. ithaca: cornell university press. lawton, thomas, james rosenau and amy verdun (eds.). (2000). strange power: shaping the parameters of international relations and international political economy. aldershot: ashgate. may, christopher. (1996). “strange fruit: susan strange’s theory of structural power in the international political economy,” global society, 10 (2), 167-89. nitzan, jonathan and shimshon bichler. (2009). capital as power: a study of order and creorder. london: routledge. power, the state and global politics after the great freeze: towards a new articulation? 118 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times palan, ronen. (1999) “susan strange 1923-1998: a great international relations theorist,” review of international political economy, 6 (2), 121-32. porter, tony. (2005). globalization and finance. cambridge: polity press. russell, ellen d. (2008). new deal banking reform and keynesian welfare state capitalism. london: routledge. schmidt, brian c. (1998). the political discourse of anarchy: a disciplinary history of international relations albany: state university of new york press. ______________. (2005). “competing realist conceptions of power,” millennium, 33 (3), 523-549. scholte, jan aart. (2000). globalization: a critical introduction. basingstoke: macmillan. sinclair, timothy. (2005). the new masters of capital: american bondrating agencies and the politics of creditworthiness. ithaca: cornell university press. strange, susan. (1983). “cave! hic dragones: a critique of regime analysis,” in krasner (1983). ____________. (1986). casino capitalism. oxford: basil blackwell. ____________. (1987). “the persistent myth of lost hegemony,” international organization, vol. 41, no. 4: 551-74. ____________. (1988a). “the future of the american empire,” journal of international affairs, 42 (1), 1-17. ____________. (1988b). states and markets. london: pinter. ____________. (1989). “towards a theory of transnational empire,” in ernst-otto czempiel and james rosenau, eds, global changes and theoretical challenges: approaches to world politics in the 1990s. lexington: lexington books. ____________. (1998). mad money. manchester: manchester university press. thirkwell-white, ben. (2009). “dealing with the banks: populism and the public interest in the global financial architecture,” international affairs, vol. 85, no. 4: 689711. tooze, roger. (2000). “ideology, knowledge and power in international relations and international political economy,” in lawton, rosenau and verdun (2000). underhill, geoffrey r.d. (2000). “state, market and global political economy: genealogy of an (inter-?) discipline,” international affairs, 76 (4), 805-24. ____________________ and xiaoke zhang. (2008). “setting the rules: private power, political underpinnings, and legitimacy in global monetary and financial governance,” international affairs, vol. 84, no. 3: 536-54. | 119 wood, duncan. (2005). governing global banking: the basel committee and the politics of financial globalization. aldershot: ashgate. power, the state and global politics after the great freeze: towards a new articulation? when resistance isn’t futile | 109 when resistance isn’t futile: understanding canadian labour’s fight for decent pensions — joel davison harden1 in recent years, the canadian labour congress (clc) – the political voice for over 3.2 million union members in english canada – waged a “retirement security for everyone” campaign. at the core of the campaign were three demands: doubling future canada pension plan (cpp) benefits; eliminating retiree poverty; and creating a federal insurance system for workplace pensions. from 2009-2010, the campaign was the top priority for canadian unions with most allocating significant attention and resources to the effort. many consider this the best work canadian unions have done since the “free trade” battles of the late 1980s (wilson, 2011). during the height of the clc’s pension campaign, employers and governments were compelled to acknowledge union perspectives. important legislative reforms were introduced while thousands of ordinary union members shared common demands articulated through their own experience. this article describes how the campaign took shape, and its lessons for progressive strategy. of any, the importance of bottom-up, inclusive activism was reinforced by this example, far more of which must happen if unions want effective anti-austerity campaigns in tough political conditions. despite the many challenges facing unions, effective resistance isn’t futile with an educated, empowered, and confident union membership. there are four distinct phases to the clc’s pension campaign explored here. the first involved the years preceding the 2008 financial crisis when unions were hamstrung by an expert-led focus on pension 1 joel davison harden is an ottawa-based writer and activist. he was the previous registrar of the labour college of canada, and director of the labour education department at the canadian labour congress. i sincerely thank the following reviewers who offered helpful advice and comments: alan zuege, govind rao, rebecca schein, and ingo schmidt. any mistakes that remain are mine alone. 110 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism issues, and stymied by a stalemate in canada’s pension debate. this period then gave way to a second “discovery phase” from 2006-2008 as the clc grappled with the complexity of pension issues on the one hand, and the need for inclusive pension activism (of relevance to union and non-union workers) on the other. by the autumn of 2009, with an effective campaign in place, the clc entered into a third “capacity development phase” where hundreds (perhaps thousands) of activists received training on pension issues. once a critical mobilization point was achieved, substantial momentum developed for pension reforms, with a wide array of observers crediting the clc for driving the discussion. by the end of 2010, however, the clc pension campaign entered a tough fourth phase of limited opportunity for activism on pension issues. a key factor was the federal government’s decision to withdraw interest in cpp expansion, but the clc also suffered from a drop in bottom-up pension activism. what follows is an attempt to grasp the lessons learned over the entirety of these four campaign phases. canada’s pension stalemate ends (2005-2006) the years preceding the clc’s pension campaign are best understood against the “tech wreck” of 2000-2002, when dot com firms became investor nightmares. robert brown, an actuary and academic from the university of waterloo, reflected on canada’s pension debate at the height of this crisis. his conclusion was instructive: the key issue in canada was an unwillingness from unions to exchange defined benefit (db) workplace pensions for individual account arrangements (2001). the biggest reason was the simplicity and security of db plans, which allowed workers to predict their future pension based on years of service, best average or career salary, and a certain percentage of earnings. with this in mind, the rest of this article refers to db plans as “decent pensions”, unlike rrsps, 401k’s, or so-called “defined contribution” plans where retirement benefits are based on the performance of pension investments and prevailing interest rates at the moment of a worker’s retirement. db pensions are decent because of the pension promise that underpins them; benefits, at least in theory, are predictable, and union negotiators were reluctant to let them go (though some felt compelled to make that choice). as a result, the number of workers covered by db plans in canada, unlike other countries, increased from the mid 1970s to 2004 (even as the percentage of workers enjoying db plans dropped by 7 percent from 1992 to 2005) (statscan, 2005; townson, 2009). a major source of db plan growth came from women in the canadian public sector. when resistance isn’t futile | 111 by 2004, bob baldwin – then a clc pension specialist – wrote about a stalemate produced by these conditions (2004). one end of this stalemate was the failure of pension industry lobbyists to succeed in major campaigns of privatization. in the 1990s they had campaigned unsuccessfully to transform the cpp/qpp into a system of individual accounts. industry lobbyists took a further hit when the tech wreck devastated pensions, particularly market-linked individual accounts. it was hardly a time to suggest that canadians should fend for themselves. but if conditions were not ideal for canada’s pension industry, they were more troublesome for unions. by 2005, a third of workingage canadians (18-64) had no personal retirement savings, and only 30 percent contributed to registered retired savings plans (or rrsps, the canadian version of the american 401k) (statistics canada: 2006). of the 17 million workers in paid employment in 2005, almost 11 million (or 62 percent) were not part of any workplace pension plan (statistics canada, 2005). organized labour had negotiated pensions for union members, but decent coverage had not spread widely outside the public sector. by 2005, barely 20 percent of private sector workers had decent pensions, and this had much to do with the growth of precarious, non-union work, and the stalled position of union organizing in general. this regrettable situation posed major problems for unions’ intent on advancing the progressive side of canada’s pension debate. the pension industry was first in attempting to break this stalemate. in the summer of 2005, the association of canadian pension management released a paper entitled back from the brink: securing the future of defined benefit pension plans (acpm, 2005). its key demand was control of the surplus that accrued on a yearly basis when pension investments performed well, and a call for less stringent pension funding rules. without question, these arguments were made at an opportune time. by 2005, the u.s. housing market was in full stride, and finance capital was building a new speculative bubble. in 2005 and 2006, as employers sought control of pension surplus, this bubble was peaking. any financial organization (or employer with the access to pension fund investments) was freeing up available cash to get in on the game, either through listed trades on stock markets or via the shadow banking system of over-the-counter derivatives trading (blackburn, 2007). the fight over pension funding and surplus was therefore a fight over a lucrative source of profit, among the most generous in all of global capitalism. what frustrated canadian employers were regulations and court rulings that made ownership of pension surplus unclear, and therefore 112 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism subject to extensive legal battles. in a unionized environment, collective bargaining agreements often specified ownership of pension surplus be negotiated or shared. it faced a similar challenge in efforts to weaken pension funding rules. by 2005, unions were in no mood to offer that consent, and politicians were nervous about being perceived as advocates of an insecure pension system. nonetheless, the intensity of the moment forced governments to intervene, and facilitate discussion on this issue. in november 2005, the canadian federal government hosted a “work to retirement roundtable” at wilson house (where the meech lake accord constitutional negotiations were once held in 1987). what transpired there spoke to the status of canada’s pension debate. following a brief introduction by federal government facilitators, both union and industry leaders staked out positions. employer executives wanted more “fairness” and “flexibility” to facilitate the growth of decent pensions. union leaders insisted that meant strengthening (not weakening) the existing pension system, notably the well-being of db plans. government facilitators looked on with increasing unease – there was no clear consensus on the key issues. both sides were dug in, with no apparent appetite for compromise. industry was attempting to break the 2004 stalemate, but unions were not budging. at the same time, the stalemate was already unraveling under the force of other pressures. in the private sector, many employers were following through on threats to convert db plans into less secure arrangements. the cost of public sector worker pensions was (and remains) a frequent source of banter among the usual pundits. to effectively counter these attacks, the clc needed a vision for change that could compete with the industry-employer view, and unite a broad coalition for progressive reform. but first, the clc needed its own analysis of the pension industry, and a better sense of the industry’s role in the architecture of global capitalism. as the next section explains, a series of important research discoveries would allow this to happen. 2006-2007: the clc in discovery mode on pensions starting in early 2006, research surfaced which undermined industry arguments, and helped clarify the clc’s positions in canada’s pension debate. since the acpm’s back from the brink paper, industry lobbyists claimed (to some degree of success) that funding rules restricted the growth of decent pensions. curiously enough, an article for an industry magazine, the pensions and benefits monitor (by greg hurst, an influential pensions consultant from vancouver), demolished this position (2006). when resistance isn’t futile | 113 what stood in the way of decent pension coverage, hurst argued, were employers who viewed pension plans as “cash management tools”. in the 1980s and 1990s, high interest rates generated huge windfalls for pension funds, often to the point where most were fully funded from investment returns alone. in these situations, pension rules in canada allow employers to pursue “contribution holidays”, an unfortunate practice that continues to this day. research from elsewhere confirmed hurst’s analysis. quebec’s pension regulator has estimated that over $2.9 billion was taken in contribution holidays by employers from 1991 to 2000 (gold, 2006). bernard dussault, the former chief actuary of the canada pension plan from 1992-1998, insists this led to the hobbled funding condition of pension plans in general, and their lack of preparation for the leaner years of 2001-2003 and 2008 (2009). thanks to contribution holidays, employers did not maintain a “rainy day” fund to cushion the blow of market slumps. instead, they could redirect pension surplus for other purposes – the details for which will never be known. hurst painted a picture that did not fit with the industry’s explanation, and it gave rise to lively debate in progressive circles. union researchers soon questioned whether “cupboard is bare” arguments by employers on pensions had any merit, and they quickly found grist for their mill. in april 2006, non-financial employers enjoyed a “net lending position” (or balance sheet surplus) of $80.6 billion, and the international monetary fund documented a similar trend worldwide (tomas, 2006; cardarelli et al, 2006). two years later, a report from desjardins securities, a financial services firm, explained canadian employers had operating profits 18.3 times the size of their pension liabilities (gibson et al, 2008). an averagesized employer, the report argued, could pay down pension liabilities with just one to two months of profit, or a year’s worth of operating cash flow. the april 2006 issue of benefits canada (a widely-read industry magazine) noted the pension industry had grown to a size of $1.3 trillion, larger than the total of all goods and services sold in canada the previous year (cakebread, 2006). the following month, a british study posed more ambitious questions. according to the authors, the industry push for pension privatization (in canada and elsewhere) was part of a more ambitious effort: “pension privatization is not really about pensions at all, but about extending capital markets, the free movement of capital, and changing the role of the state. the philosophy of [pensions] has changed over the twentieth 114 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism century because politics has changed ... the critical issue is not a choice between the state and the private sector, nor the precise balance between a basic pension and a supplemental one, nor non-funding versus funding, nor general taxation versus contributions based on income. instead, it is the question of whether financial institutions, financial markets and the “free movement of capital” should play leading roles in social welfare. debates about pensions cannot ignore the effects pension schemes have on relationships between finance and industry, investment, and the broader social and economic implications of the stock-market approach to welfare or social security.” (minns and sexton, 2006, p.35-36). robin blackburn, a british historian, took this analysis even further (2007). for him, the attack on decent pensions was not just about creating freer reign for global finance, it was primarily an attempt to restore employer profitability which had gradually slipped since the mid-1970s. if employers and finance executives could access retirement savings, these substantial funds could be diverted to the lucrative paper chase of stock traders and ticker boards. empowered by a new political context, employers could siphon off money meant for pensions to invest in various financial products, earning a tidy sum in the process. over time, many did precisely this, but the perks were temporary if employers remained on the hook for a workers’ pension. hence the industry-employer preference to close decent pensions, and opt for schemes where workers bear the risk of market slumps. seen in this light, the attack on decent pensions was part of what blackburn called the “financialization” of capitalism in general. in the course of a few short decades, pension funds were no longer sources of “patient capital”, facilitating the lending of money to create investment and jobs. instead, in a relatively short period of time, they became enmeshed in a paper chase where rampant speculation and fee extraction trumped reasonable judgement. as this happened, precious little went to genuine economic expansion, or what jim stanford has called the “real economy” (1999; 2008). in fact stanford explains that, at the height of recent financialization, every dollar of investment in real production was eclipsed by a hundred dollars in pure speculation (stanford, 2008). such speculative activity was permitted by loose financial regulation in us stock markets, the heart of the system. stock traders and ticker boards, propelled by the heavyweights of global finance, were ballooning a bubble of massive proportions, and often using workers’ retirement savings to supply the hot air. the attack on pensions, while when resistance isn’t futile | 115 profitable, also had the additional benefit of disciplining unions, and taking back much of the postwar compromise in which workplace pensions emerged. soon enough, as the clc grasped this bigger picture, they began challenging the framework for pension discussions in general. in a submission to finance canada on pension reform, clc president ken georgetti made this explicit: “in a letter to minister flaherty dated march 27, 2005, i expressed the clc’s deep regret that the federal review of defined benefit pensions was taking place in a context where corporate lobbyists were guiding the discussion. this has been confirmed in recent months with the government’s proposed [pension funding] regulations, which read like a wish list for the pension industry. the federal debate on defined benefit pensions – and retirement security for all canadians – must be refocused, and reflect the cooperative values most canadians share. in the twenty-first century, after eight decades of federal pension policy, it should no longer be acceptable for any working canadian to retire into insecurity. a secure, enjoyable retirement should be the reward for decades of contributions to one’s community and canada’s economy.” (georgetti, 2006, p.7). at a federal government “pension policy dialogue” in 2007, the clc also came out swinging. why should unions, they asked, take hits in pension rights after years of employer contribution holidays? why should consumers be charged ridiculous fees (so-called “management expense ratios”) for the mutual funds sold by canada’s financial sector (see: korma et al, 2006)? and, above all, given most workers are without decent pensions or significant retirement savings, what is the government’s vision to ensure retirement security for everyone? the clc soon realized that power brokers were ignoring such questions. instead, debate remained focused on one thing: closing decent pensions, increasing employer access to pension surpluses, and weakening pension funding rules. at government pension consultations in 2006-2007, these objectives were repeatedly sought. finance minister jim flaherty wrote to the congress of union retirees of canada responding to their concerns about canada pension plan benefits. at that time, minister flaherty insisted the cpp status quo was acceptable, and that current contribution rates “will remain unchanged” (2007). the letter confirmed what the clc already knew: in 2007, there was little appetite to expand the modest cpp benefits available to all in paid employment. 116 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism given these realities, the clc faced tough conditions. it had gone through a valuable discovery phase, gained a broader awareness of pension issues, and expressed it well to reporters and politicians. these interventions made an impact, but they had not shifted the industry and employer framework that defined canada’s pension debate. through polling research, the clc had confirmed union members wanted action on pension reform, but the kind of reform was unclear. most union activists, while an important voice in communities across canada, were not informed players in the pension debate. given this situation, union leaders and researchers were labour’s political action team, and that limited group ensured less political influence. for that to change the clc needed a “capacity development phase” that could empower union activists to engage in pension activism; this activist core could then recruit others, and apply pressure to waverers and opponents. but for that to happen, a clear and compelling vision was required. if this was done well, politicians would face constituent anger (and electoral consequences) for not championing a more adequate, fair and secure pension system. as many have explained, canadian history had seen this happen before, particularly when pensioners were involved (finlayson, 1989; deaton, 1989; morton, 1987). a golden opportunity soon presented itself: the clc had pledged to hold a pension conference in late 2007, and union activists were motivated to participate. but what kind of conference would this be? would it feature technical workshops of use to pension specialists, or a clear and compelling vision for pension reform? between these two choices, unions leaders picked the latter, and at times to the dismay of their pension specialists. the 3rd clc pension conference theme was move forward together or fend for yourself? the future of canadian pensions, and offered a clear indication that labour had grasped the bigger picture. the conference was structured around political demands and aimed to refocus the clc’s pension work. a discussion paper was circulated that prioritized cpp expansion, improved public pensions, and a federal system of pension insurance (clc, 2007). three hundred and thirty-five delegates participated, making it the most successful event the clc had held in some time. all delegates were registered on a “clc pension activism” email list, which proved useful given mobilizations that happened later. one could sense union confidence on pensions was building. debbie marantz, a pension representative for the communications, energy, and paperworkers union, captured this in a report to her executive board: when resistance isn’t futile | 117 “the 3rd annual clc pension conference from november 1 to 3 in ottawa was meant to energize those attending and to assist them in focusing on labour’s campaign to protect pensions and retirement security. and, may i say, for myself and everyone else who had the opportunity to attend, it did that and a lot more.” (2007, p. 5). 2008-2010: crisis and opportunity for labour on pensions by 2008, the clc shifted into action on pensions, and not a moment too soon. in april, the viral impact of wall street’s defective investments was clear, setting off a chain of events well documented by others (ferguson, 2012; mcnally, 2010). the resulting slump, at its worst, caused stock markets to plummet by 52 percent and pension funds worldwide lost $5 trillion usd in assets (over three times the size of canada’s economy in 2008) (oecd, 2009). at first, canada’s federal government denied these problems seeped north of the 49th parallel. in his economic and fiscal update of november 21, 2008, finance minister jim flaherty announced a budget surplus, and prime minister stephen harper speculated about “buying opportunities” in plummeting stock markets (as cited in palmer, 2008). in a further bizarre move, a clawback on party financing was also announced (canceling, among other things, the $1.75 per vote federal political parties had received since 2003) which forced the hand of the government’s opposition. a constitutional crisis followed, with a coalition of opposition parties threatening to oust the federal government from power. to avoid that outcome, the federal government introduced a range of economic measures (which now meant forecasting a deficit of $64 billion) (harper, 2008). among these measures were new rounds of consultations on pension reforms, which the clc rightly saw as an opportunity to advance its agenda for progressive change. after organizing an initial round of public forums on the economic crisis in january 2009, the clc began a nationwide process of pension education sessions empowering union activists to attend federal pension consultations en masse. this proved to be challenging given details for consultations were often released a week before they were held, but the member response was unlike anything the clc had seen in decades. the first consultation took place in ottawa on march 13, 2009, and union activists accounted for most of the 150 people in attendance. this hardly surprised officials who were aware of labour’s focus on pension issues. what shocked them, however, were ideas that came from the front 118 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism of the room. bernard dussault, the chief actuary of the canada pension plan and old age security from 1992-1998, had been invited as an expert to share his thoughts on specific reforms to federally-regulated pension plans. but dussault, a major player in the cpp debates of the 1990s, did not restrict his comments to such narrow parameters. he instead proposed a dramatic expansion of cpp benefits that would eventually see all canadians earn 70 per cent of their salary in retirement (dussault, 2008). it was a case to shift the canadian pension system to a “medicare” model, and away from its largely “fend for yourself” design. the direct losers would be banks and financial services companies who would almost certainly forego rrsp clients. dussault’s vision shook the pension establishment, and labour now realized it had a powerful ally in the case for pension reform. as the consultations moved to six other canadian cities, halls were filled with angry union members and retirees. soon after, a conference room in halifax meant for eighty participants was swamped by 150 people. loretta kent, a worker based at av pulp and paper in nackawic, new brunswick, shared one of many compelling pension stories heard that day. loretta’s employer had declared bankruptcy in 2004 after underfunding the pension plan for five years. as a result, her pension went from 92 per cent funded to 48 per cent funded. when the employer emerged from bankruptcy protection, loretta and her co-workers realized how much they lost given canada’s unfair bankruptcy rules, which rank workers’ pensions at the bottom of an employer’s list of creditors. for loretta, it meant $400 in pension after sixteen years of service. not $400 a month, or $400 a year, but a one-time post-bankruptcy payout of $400 (kent, 2009). after she spoke, the entire room (industry experts included) stood and applauded her courage in sharing this story. in toronto, a room for 150 was packed by over 300 participants. one after another, they berated the government for failing to adequately protect their pensions, and provide decent options for the next generation. as len wallace, a retiree leader for the canadian autoworkers union (caw) spoke, heads nodded around the room: “why should politicians and ceos,” he fumed, “get amazing pension plans, but not fight to ensure everyone else gets the same? what’s the message to young people there? do our kids have to be politicians and ceos to retire with dignity?” (wallace, 2009). in vancouver, a room meant for 225 was filled well beyond capacity, and once again retirees in particular made their presence felt. art kube, past-president of the council of senior citizens organizations of b.c., reminded government officials not to use consultations to delay reform. “consultation is fine, and talking is fine,” kube said, “but we’ve had when resistance isn’t futile | 119 many years of that. we want action. and let me remind you of the obvious: seniors vote and we vote for people who care about pensions. you get this issue wrong, and you could be out of a job” (kube, 2009). the 2009 federal pension consultations confirmed what union leaders had said all along: pension anxiety was wide and deep, and action was required to fix the system. the clc had prepared briefings and materials for union participants in the consultations, and these proved useful for the predictable deflections that came from the front of the room. a joint submission by seven federal employers (employing over 50 percent of all federal sector workers) once again demanded greater access to pension surplus and weaker pension funding rules (air canada et al, 2009). as they made these demands, the pension stories shared by workers and retirees became a powerful source of resistance. it was difficult to seek concessions in rooms filled with people facing an insecure pension future. on april 23, 2009, yet another event added to labour’s pension momentum. following a call from the caw, over 15,000 people demonstrated at the ontario legislature in toronto to “protect our pensions.” rally participants included angry nortel networks workers and pensioners (facing significant concessions from a bankrupt employer), irate caw members, and several concerned citizens who came for their own reasons. a toronto “stewards assembly” held two weeks later (called by the toronto and york region labour council) drew over 1800 participants, from rank and file union stewards and elected union officials, and pensions were a hot topic. the globe and mail – a widely-read newspaper in english canada among intellectuals and policymakers – took close notes at both events, capturing several compelling stories for an influential series than ran six months later (entitled “retirement lost”). union activists realized that politicians could no longer, after bailouts for finance companies in 2008, ignore pleas to fix canada’s pension system. momentum for change was starting to build — pension anger and anxiety had traction in the mainstream press and public mind. in the midst of these opportune conditions, the clc released its latest vision for pension reform (clc, 2009b). its july 2009 discussion paper — entitled adequacy, security, fairness: labour’s proposals for the future of canadian pensions – proposed three core demands: 1. doubling future cpp benefits through a phased-in increase of 60% to worker and employer contributions; 2. a 15 percent increase to the guaranteed income supplement to federal old age security pensions (amounting to a $100 per month boost for low-income pensioners at a yearly cost of $1.2 billion); 120 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism 3. implementing an insurance system to protect workplace pensions should an employer declare bankruptcy, to a value of $2500 per month (pp. 6-8). these demands formed the backbone of the clc’s retirement security for everyone campaign launched on september 7, 2009, and elements of this vision were soon evident well beyond progressive circles. on september 11, 2009, the provinces of saskatchewan, alberta and british columbia threatened to “go it alone” on pension reform in the absence of coordinated action from ottawa, and referenced cpp reform among other options (d’alliesio, 2009). on september 15, the financial post ran a lead story entitled “pensions loom as election issue” that featured angry nortel retirees, and quoted clc chief economist andrew jackson on labour’s plan to expand the cpp (mazurkewich, 2009). the following day, david dennison, president and ceo of the cpp investment board (cppib), commented on the public debate over the fund’s future (dennison, 2009). the cppib had usually restricted its public relations to investment issues, but dennison confirmed the depth of canada’s pension problems, and acknowledged a range of potential cpp reforms (including the clc’s proposal). on october 16, the globe and mail’s “retirement lost” was released, beginning with these words: “canadians can no longer assume they will retire with security. many are seeking increasingly scarce work while others flail as their onceflush retirement accounts hemorrhage. a globe and mail series beginning today shows that the crisis in canadian pensions is not looming; it is here, and has been for some time. a concerted national effort, involving changes in policy, behaviour and mindset from governments, businesses, unions, pension overseers and individual canadians, is needed to repel the crisis.” (mcnish et al., 2009). a week later, over three thousand nortel workers and retirees joined union activists on parliament hill, demanding justice for a company once thought to the jewel of canada’s “silicon valley north”. earlier that month, nortel ceo mike zafirovski appeared before the house of commons finance committee, and was forced to account for demanding a 30 percent reduction in pensioner cheques while authorizing a $45 million bonus plan for top executives (cbc, 2009). this was a “hairshirt” moment for corporate canada, and the clc did much to publicize the exuberant heights to which executive pay and pensions had soared. when resistance isn’t futile | 121 politicians promised reforms due to an unrelenting wave of negative publicity, mobilizations, and appeals for change. after being ignored or dismissed by the pension establishment, the logjam that kept progressive options off the table had been broken. almost immediately, canada’s federal political parties began jostling for position on pension issues. the new democratic party and bloc quebecois supported the clc’s demands, while the liberal party proposed an expansion of the cpp through a private sector model. the ruling conservatives, however, were cool to any ambitious plans. reacting to the liberal proposal, federal finance minister jim flaherty accused his opponents of a “knee-jerk reaction to a serious issue”, while his staff warned against policy ideas that might “saddle taxpayers with big obligations” (cited in chase, 2007). this was the first sign of a counter-attack to the clc’s new momentum on pensions, with more to come soon. as provincial, federal and territorial finance ministers prepared to meet in december (in whitehorse, yukon territory), similar appeals continued from government reports and spokespersons. jack mintz, a public policy professor based at the university of calgary, wrote a report for the whitehorse meeting which emphasized the strength of the existing pension system (2009). bob baldwin, the former pension clc expert, produced a study for the ontario government which downplayed ambitious reform, preferring instead to suggest “key subordinate questions”, and hint at “mixing and matching” various policy ideas (2009, p. 76, 78). “fend for yourself” advocates seized on the ambiguity produced by these claims. the canadian bankers association released a paper calling for raised rrsp limits (2009), while the c.d. howe institute published a study attacking federal public service pensions (using, critics charged, questionable assumptions to balloon the perceived costs) (laurin and robson, 2009). david dodge, former governor of the bank of canada, likened an expansion of the cpp to a “nanny state solution”, and urged finance ministers to embrace policy options that allow “choice” in retirement planning (as cited in scoffield, 2009). these arguments gave politicians an excuse to deflect appeals for substantial reform, but they confirmed the clc’s pension campaign had traction. the province of british columbia said as much through its own independent study (also shared with finance ministers) that discussed cpp reform in positive terms (2009). nevertheless, the whitehorse talks ended with no commitment to reform, and most space given to dismissals from mintz and others. the positive outcome was a pledge 122 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism to hold further public hearings, leave “no policy option off the table”, and articulate a clear direction on pension reform at the next finance ministers meeting in june 2010. if whitehorse was a tough moment for the clc campaign, it was also clear that momentum for progressive options had not stalled. in fact, the clc’s lesson from whitehorse was that more grass-roots mobilization was needed to push politicians in the right direction. so, from january to april 2010, the clc worked with others in organized labour to host large pension forums, many of which invited attendees to share their own pension anxieties and concerns. the anger expressed at these forums generated more political action as labour activists pressed local politicians, held rallies and occupied constituency offices of pension industry supporters. this second wave of bottom-up pension activism quickly morphed into a movement for pension justice. the movement’s climax happened in march 2010, when the clc and ontario federation of labour hosted a “pension summit” in toronto that offered space to divergent perspectives to debate the way forward. almost six hundred delegates attended, including federal finance minister jim flaherty, canadian federation of independent business ceo catherine swift, pension consultant keith ambachtscheer, and influential employer-side actuary malcolm hamilton. these voices, unlike usual, did not dominate the proceedings. union delegates posed tough questions, and soon realized how brittle the “fend for yourself” establishment was. it was a moment where organized labour discovered a sense of its power, and one could feel received wisdom starting to shift. incredibly, this shift was also on display a month later at an elite pension conference hosted by jack mintz at the university of calgary. ken georgetti was invited to speak on a panel with industry heavyweights (who, we can presume, were expected to lay waste to the clc pension campaign). but when robert brown (a former top executive for price waterhouse coopers) spoke after georgetti, he told a stunned audience that expanding the canada pension plan was likely the “best of all available options” (georgetti, personal interview, 2010). georgetti nearly tumbled from his chair, and that reaction was modest compared to mintz’s gaping jaw. without question, the clc notched a minor victory in the heart of canada’s conservative policy establishment. in june, this was followed by a resolution passed at the federation of canadian municipalities convention, where delegates when resistance isn’t futile | 123 (including the mayors of canada’s large cities) backed he clc’s call to expand the cpp. the call for pension reform was making an impact at the highest official levels of canadian politics. this was confirmed in june 2010 when federal finance minister jim flaherty announced a new consensus among his colleagues for pension reform. the policy direction, he argued, would involve a “modest expansion of the canada pension plan”, while encouraging the financial sector to offer new retirement savings products (as cited in curry, 2010). alberta stressed its objections to the cpp reform, but it emerged as a lone voice doing so (with, perhaps, some support from right-leaning saskatchewan as well). union activists celebrated the result, and took pride in creating an historic moment in canada’s long-running pension debate. the rest of the summer, however, was unkind to organized labour. by the time union activists returned for labour day weekend, cpp reform was sputtering in the top levels of the federal government. in november, the federal government unveiled legislation enabling pooled registered pension plans (prpps), the latest “fend for yourself” policy option (department of finance, 2010). prpps would be voluntary in nature, and did not even require employer contributions. critics from across the political spectrum argued prpps would do little to expand the scope of workplace pension coverage. the clc fumed about prpps receiving higher priority than cpp reform, and this fact was confirmed a month later when prime minister stephen harper confirmed the latter was officially off the table. “canadians”, harper insisted, “are looking for options ... not a hike in their cpp premiums” (as cited in scoffield, 2010). the union reaction was furious: flaherty’s constituency office was occupied by enraged protesters, and the clc would later announce two access-to-information requests aimed at exposing who undermined cpp reform. prior to a meeting of finance ministers in late december, a joint letter from the governments of british columbia, ontario, prince edward island, new brunswick, manitoba, and nova scotia urged the federal government to re-commit to cpp expansion, but this overture was rebuffed by flaherty at a meeting the following week. the window of opportunity evident months earlier was abruptly closed. looking forward: how did it happen? how can it happen again? despite this unfortunate result, the clc’s pension campaign is a good news story in otherwise tough times for unions. as observers sift through the tea leaves of this experience, it will be important to under124 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism stand where the clc’s clout on pensions came from, and how it can be restored. at a time when many question the political capacity of organized labour, this was an example of collective action winning positive results. not mentioned in the above narrative, for example, were legislative changes canadian governments felt compelled to make given widespread pension activism. these included guaranteed wage payouts in the event of corporate bankruptcies, strengthened rights for pension plan members, and guidelines to prevent federal sector employers “walking away” from unfunded liabilities in their pension plans. these were not the specific objectives the clc sought, but significant in their own right, and more than could have been won without any activity at all. they also offer important lessons about what kind of activism is effective in today’s challenging times. the first is the necessity for unions, where possible, to pursue broad and inclusive campaigns. in 2007, the clc made the crucial decision to depart from an expert-led focus on pensions, and embrace demands that bridged the concerns of union and non-union workers. in this vein, the decision to champion cpp reform and public pensions was important; industry critics could not easily criticize unions for being “self-interested”, and non-union workers could be credibly told the clc was fighting for everyone. the opposite would have happened if the focus had been protecting the pensions of unionized workers. such defensive campaigns do not appeal to a wider public grown weary from decades of “fend for yourself” economic policy (in pensions and elsewhere). if organized labour is unable or unwilling to mount broad campaigns, employers will do so, and redirect public anger against “privileged unions”. this is why us labour’s recent pursuit of the employee free choice act was doomed to fail, and the clc learned a similar lesson after a vigorous pursuit of federal “antiscab” legislation in 2007 (harden, 2007). these goals, while important, will not appeal to a broad enough base, and will cater to the perception that unions are driven by self-interest. to regain momentum, unions must demonstrate their capacity to win victories for all workers. this was the first strength of the clc’s pension campaign — it offered a compelling vision of “retirement security for everyone”, and forced opponents to defend a flawed status quo. the second strength of the clc pension campaign was its efforts to harness the fears, energies, and dreams of everyday union members. when it first realized an opportunity to mobilize on pension issues, the clc could have simply presented its spokespersons to “multiwhen resistance isn’t futile | 125 stakeholder” meetings and media opportunities. instead, following the advice of marshall ganz (2001; 2009) and others, the clc did that and much more. it recognized the power of workers’ stories, and invited them into a focused campaign. for that to happen, the clc financed an extensive, two-year process of pension education, at first to intervene in federal government hearings, but later to ensure inspired advocacy took place in every region possible. as clc campaigners criss-crossed the nation, they empowered union members to argue the merits of improved public pensions through the realities of a retiree on their street. the argument for pension insurance, likewise, was articulated locally as a backstop to prevent more nortels, abitibi-bowaters, or av pulp and papers (as referenced in loretta’s story above) from tearing communities apart. the costs of cpp expansion were explained as a sacrifice of a few take-out coffees or magazine subscriptions per month. from these local, accessible perspectives, union activists could speak from a position of strength, recruit supporters, and apply significant pressure to intransigent decision-makers. to this the clc added an array of attractive materials which activists would colour with local stories (which were often more difficult for politicians to dispute). this was a welcome departure from clc’s earlier pension education efforts – intermittent regional courses, and research papers published for a specialist audience. solid research would remain a key element of the campaign, but a newly-mobilized layer of pension activists gave the clc renewed agency on pension issues. this vindicated those who insist that “staffing up” or “hyper-professionalizing” takes unions away from their source of strength: the activism of union members (clawson, 2008). if the grassroots of organized labour take ownership of campaigns, mass participation can happen, and much is possible. if union activists are compelled to act as a stage army, far less enthusiasm can be expected. for genuine success, labour’s rank and file must be the authors of change. relatedly, the need to sustain local activism is third and final lesson from the clc’s campaign and it is likely the most challenging to understand. during the clc’s capacity development phase, it was never clear how bottom-up mobilizations would continue beyond appeals to politicians or mobilizations for various events. and yet, many of the campaign’s most impressive moments came because activists themselves scored blows against the forces of pension austerity. the mass meetings, rallies, and sit-ins happened because union members gained a sense of their power, and focused it against a common adversary. 126 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism by june 2010, an apparent victory (through cpp reform) caused many to think change was coming. the truth, of course, was otherwise — and blame is hard to allocate about why this perception was widespread. the clc leadership urged vigilance following flaherty’s june 2010 announcement, and called on local pressure to “get the job done”. pension activists sent in numerous requests for additional campaign materials and further trainings, many of which came to fruition. however one interprets the federal government’s final decision, they clearly believed that betraying an earlier pledge would not entail significant political consequences. as it happened, this turned out to be true – in canada’s may 2011 federal election, the ruling conservatives won their first majority government. clc supporters (particularly the ndp) also did well, but not well enough to ensure greater adequacy, fairness, and security for canada’s pension system. that weighty task remains, and it is one organized labour must take seriously. if capitalism’s crisis-prone history portends anything, it is more economic slumps and major assaults on the living conditions of workers. when (and not if) that happens, unions must present a vision of change that inspires action, rather like the 99 percent visionaries whose protest encampments challenged the world’s financial elite, or the quebec student movement who (as these words were written) held fast in the face of enormous pressures. canada’s unions, despite their many challenges, can be a similar political force. this is possible, even probable, but only likely with the active involvement of labour’s rank and file; their activism is the best means of ensuring resistance isn’t futile, both for today and numerous battles ahead. references air canada et al. (2009, march 5). joint submission to the department of finance canada on its january 2009 pension plan consultation paper. http://www.fin.gc.ca/consultresp/pdf/040-joint-submissiondepartment-offinance-march5th-final.pdf. allemang, j. (2012, may 2). the sorry state of our unions. globe and mail. p. f1. association of canadian pension management (acpm). (2005). back from the brink: securing the future of defined benefit plans. http://www. acpm.com/resources/7/pdf/acfd2b.pdf bakvis, p. (2005). social security models and the neoliberal challenge. http://library.fes.de/pdf-files/gurn/00019.pdf. baldwin, b. (2004). pension reform in canada in the 1990s. what was accomplished, what lies ahead? ottawa: canadian labour congress. when resistance isn’t futile | 127 baldwin, b. (2009, october). research study on the canadian retirement income system [prepared for the ministry of finance, government of ontario]. http://www.fin.gov.on.ca/en/consultations/pension/ dec09report.html. blackburn, r. (2003). banking on death or investing in life: the history and future of pensions. london: verso. blackburn, r. (2007). age shock: how finance is failing us. london: verso. blackburn, r. (2006, may/june). finance and the fourth dimension. new left review. 39, 39-70. government of british columbia (2009, december ). options for increasing pension coverage among private sector workers in canada [report prepared for the steering committee of provincial/ territorial finance ministers on pension coverage and retirement income adequacy]. http://www.fin.gov.bc.ca/pension_plan_options_ paper.pdf. brown, r. (2001). the shift to defined contribution pension plans: why did it not happen in canada? north american actuarial journal, 5(3), 65-77. cakebread, c. (2006, april). top 40 money managers report: trillion dollar baby. benefits canada. http://www.hfconferences.ca/top40/pdfs/ top40reportapril.pdf. canadian bankers association. (2009, november 23). modernizing canada’s retirement savings system. http://www.cba.ca/contents/files/ submissions/sub_20091209_pension_en.pdf. canadian labour congress. (2007). move forward together, or fend for yourself? the future of canadian pensions. http://www. canadianlabour.ca/newsroom/publications/move-forward-togetheror-fend-yourself-future-canadianpensions-3rd-clc-pensi. canadian labour congress. (2009a). response by the clc to the department of finance pension consultation paper. http://www. canadianlabour.ca/sites/default/files/pdfs/2009-03-26-federalpensionreview-en.pdf. canadian labour congress. (2009b). security, adequacy, and fairness: labour’s proposals for the future of canadian pensions. http://www. canadianlabour.ca/news-room/publications/security-adequacy fairness-labour-s-proposals-future-canadian-pension. canadian broadcasting corporation (cbc). (2009, november 26). nortel approves more exec raises. cbc news business. http://www.cbc.ca/ news/business/story/2009/11/26/nortel-raises-document.html. cardarelli et al. (2006). awash with cash: why are corporate savings so high? world economic outlook. new york: international monetary fund. 128 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism chase, s. (2009, october 27). parties square off on federal pension reform: liberals vow they would take a more activist role and expand cpp, tories warn of spiraling costs. globe and mail. http://www. theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/federal-parties-square-off-on pension-reform/article4215126/. chevreau, j. (2009, november 5). canadians get the mers they deserve. financial post.http://www2.canada.com/victoriatimescolonist/news/ business/story.html?id= 1de8b905-d81e-4f4c-a772-f9d296e736ff. clawson, d. (2008). the next upsurge: labor and the new social movements. ithaca, ny: cornell university press. curry, b. (2010, june 13). flaherty pushes for expanded cpp. globe and mail. http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/flahertypushes-forexpanded-cpp/article1602737/. d’aliesio, renata. (2009, september 11). western provinces pitch regional pension program. calgary herald. http://www.canada.com/ vancouversun/news/business/story.html?id=747fca14170d-4de3-9e43982626f37e3d&k=9970. deaton, richard. (1989). the political economy of pensions: power, politics and social change in canada, britain, and the united states. vancouver: ubc press. department of finance, government of canada. (december 2010). framework for pooled registered pension plans. http://www.fin.gc.ca/ activty/pubs/pension/prppirpac-eng.asp. dennison, d. (2009, september 16). the canadian model: moving from affordability to sufficiency [remarks made to the 16h annual conference of social security actuaries and statisticians]. http://www. cppib.ca/files/cppib_speech__issa_conference__sept_16_2009_.pdf. dussault, b. (2009). global solution to the canadian pension crisis: expansion of the cpp. presentation to the department of finance, government of canada, on “federal regulation of private pension plans, ottawa, on, canada. ferguson, c. (2012). predator nation: corporate criminals, political corruption, and the highjacking of america. new york: random house. finlayson, d. (1989). whose money is it anyway? the showdown on pensions. toronto: viking. flaherty, j. (2007, march 18). debate on cpp reform [letter to the congress of union retirees of canada]. ganz, m. (2001, august). the power of story in social movements [presentation to the annual meeting of the american sociological association]. anaheim: california. http://www.hks.harvard.edu/ organizing/tools/files/mg%20power%20of%20s tory.pdf. ——— (2009, march). why stories matter. sojourners. http://sojo.net/ magazine/2009/03/why-stories-matter. when resistance isn’t futile | 129 georgetti, k. (2006, march 16). it’s time to refocus canada’s pension debate [open letter to the hon. jim flaherty, federal minister of finance, government of canada]. gibson, p. et al. (2008). research comment: could a pension crisis be next? an analysis of pension shortfalls in canada and the us. toronto: desjardins securities. gold, m. (2006). current pension issues and trends. http://www.share.ca/ files/current_pension_issues_and_trends_m._gold.pdf. harden, j. (2007, may/june) unions learn from defeat of anti-scab bill. relay, 17, 18-19. harper, s. (2008). sound foundations and open doors: canada’s blueprint for short and long-term success [remarks to the asia pacific economic cooperation ceo conference]. http://www.pm.gc.ca/eng/media. asp?id=2323. harvey, d. (2005). a brief history of neoliberalism. new york: oxford. hurst, g. (february 2006). lies, damned lies, and canada’s private pensions funding crisis. pension and benefits monitor. http://www. bpmmagazine.com/02_archives/2006/february/lies_canada_private_p ension_funding.html. kent, l. (2009, march 21). my story about a/v pulp and paper. presentation to the department of finance, government of canada, on “federal regulation of private pension plans. halifax, ns, canada. korma et al. (2006, may). mutual fund fees around the world. http:// randsco.com/_img/blog/0702/fees.pdf. kube, a. (2009, april 12) oral remarks made to the department of finance, government of canada, on “federal regulation of private pension plans”. vancouver, bc, canada. laurin, a. and robson, w. (december 2009). supersized superannuation: the startling fair-value cost of federal government pensions. backgrounder no 122. toronto: c.d. howe institute. marantz, d. (2007). report from the 3rd clc pension conference [letter to cep national executive board]. mazurkewich, k. (2009, september 15). pensions loom as election issue. financial post, p. a4. mccullough. m. (2009, november 22). why there is no retirement crisis. canadian business. http://www.canadianbusiness.com/article/11403— why-there-is-noretirement-crisis. mcnally, d. (2010). global slump: the economics and politics of crisis and resistance. san fransisco: pm press / spectre. mcnish, j. et al (2009, october 16). beyond the illusion of security. globe and mail. p. f3. 130 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism minns, r. and sexton, s. (2006). too many grannies? private pensions, corporate welfare and growing insecurity. london: the corner house. http://www.thecornerhouse.org.uk/sites/thecornerhouse.org.uk/ files/35grannies.p df. mintz, j. (2009, december 18). summary report on retirement income adequacy research [prepared for he research working group on retirement income adequacy of federal-provincial-territorial ministers of finance]. retrieved from http://www.fin.gc.ca/activty/ pubs/pension/riar-narr-eng.asp. morton, d. (1987). resisting the pension evil: bureaucracy, democracy, and canada’s board of pension commissioners, 1916-1933. canadian historical review, 68(2),199-224. national advisory council on the status of aging (naca), government of canada. (2005). seniors on the margins: aging and poverty in canada. retrieved from http://publications.gc.ca/collections/ collection/h88-5-3-2005e.pdf. organization of economic cooperation and development (oecd). (2009, october). pension markets in focus. issue 6. paris: oecd. retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/30/40/43943964.pdf. palmer, r et al. (2008, october 7). canada’s harper sees possible stock market bargains. reuters. retrieved from http://www. reuters.com/article/2008/10/07/financial-canada-opportunities idusn0747329620081007. scoffield, h. (2009, december 17). cut standard of living now for comfortable pension later: dodge. the canadian press. retrieved from http://www.capebretonpost.com/business/personal-finance/2009-12-18/ article777748/cut-standard-of-living-now-for-comfortable-pensionlater%3a-dodge/1. scoffield, h. (2010, november 17). prpp: ottawa launches new pooled registered pension plans to boost retirement savings. the canadian press. http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2011/11/17/prpp-pooledregistered-pensionplans_n_1099456.html. stanford, j. (2008) economics for everyone: a short guide to the economics of capitalism. toronto: fernwood. stanford, j. (2001). paper boom: why real prosperity requires a new approach to canada’s economy. toronto: lorimer. statistics canada. (2006). survey of financial security. ottawa: government of canada. statistics canada. (2005). pension plans in canada. ottawa: government of canada. tomas, a. (2006). recent trends in corporate finance. canadian economic observer. ottawa: statistics canada. when resistance isn’t futile | 131 townson, m. (2001). pensions under attack: what’s behind the push to privatize pensions. ottawa: canadian centre for policy alternatives. ——— (2009). what can we do about pensions? ottawa: canadian centre for policy alternatives. van riesen, g. (2007, february 12). oral remarks made to the government of ontario expert roundtable on pensions. wallace, l. (2009, april 16). oral remarks made to the department of finance, government of canada, on “federal regulation of private pension plans, ottawa, on, canada. wilson, f. (2011, may 27). how the ndp gave unions a new opportunity to organize. rabble.ca. http://rabble.ca/blogs/bloggers/fwilson/2011/05/ how-ndp-gavecanadas-unions-new-opportunity-organize. carleton university symposium: braverman and beyond introduction by john myles in a period when the intellectual division of labour is intensifying, it is rare to find a work which is generally acclaimed as being "important", much less read, by social scientists representing a wide range of disciplines and specialties. such a work is harry braverman's labor and monopoly capital and it is for this reason that braverman's analysis of "the degradation of work in the twentieth century" was selected as the topic for a special symposium held at carleton university in the fall of 1977, a summary of which appears in the following pages. the centerpiece of the symposium was an address delivered by michael burawoy, assistant professor of sociology at the university of california, berkeley. it is reprinted in this volume under the title: "between marxist orthodoxy and critical theory: comments on braverman's labor and monopoly capital" . the paper presents in summary form the major points developed in a much longer manuscript made available to the participants beforehand. a subsequent revision which in manuscript form runs to 119 pages is forthcoming in politics and society (vol. 8, no. 4). in agreeing to prepare this paper for the symposium, burawoy accepted the difficult and challenging task of critiquing braverman from within the perspective of marxist analysis. the widespread acclaim with which braverman's work has been met makes this task all the more crucial. as with any great work, it stands in danger of being accepted as the last word on its subject matter, thereby becoming an impediment alternate routes rather than an impetus to further theoretical and empirical analysis. burawoy comes well qualified for his task. his discussion of braverman, which is mainly pitched at a theoretical level, is informed by his own experience and research in a chicago factory, the results of which are to appear in a forthcoming book entitled the production of consent on the shop floor, 1945 1975: the labor process under monopoly capitalism . perhaps more than any other contemporary work, braverman 's labor and monopoly capital reflects the vitality and relevance of the recent resurgence of marxist analysis in north american sociology. the seeds which braverman has planted, however, will wither and die unless nurtured in an atmosphere of intellectual struggle and debate. accordingly the participants in the symposium were deliberately encouraged to confront one another and avoid the unfortunate practice of avoiding points of disagreement which often passes for academic good manners and professional respect. as will be apparent, the discussants of burawoy 's paper fulfilled their mandate admirably. the most extensive replies came from leo panitch and donald swartz who, like burawoy, take their position from within the marxist perspective. john porter's comments, on the other hand, are probably representative of those sociologists who have been profoundly impressed by braverman 's work without accepting his marxist frame of reference. it is hoped that the presentation of the carleton debate in this issue of alternate routes will encourage more of the same elsewhere. 29 janus-faced austerity: strengthening the ‘competitive’ canadian state carlo fanelli & chris hurl1 abstract: the global economic crisis has triggered a wave of stimulus spending throughout the world, with particular concentrations in north america, the eurozone and china. this paper examines its canadian context. focusing broadly on the deepening integration of neoliberalism since the election of stephan harper in 2006 as well as federal conservative fiscal and monetary policy, this paper delves into the janus-faced character of canadian austerity measures. it is argued that while social services and spending are restricted for certain segments of the canadian working class, new arrangements and spending initiatives are rolled out by the federal government in order to fuel enhanced capital accumulation. this paper concludes with some propositions for resisting austerity and strengthening the resolve of the canadian working class. keywords: canada; austerity; fiscal & monetary policy; capitalpreserving federalism; neoliberalism. introduction the times are tough, we are told. the grim economic climate appears unmatched in severity since the great depression. it is on this basis that social spending is being slashed and wage freezes are imposed on public sector workers across the country and around the world. in order to save a sinking ship, workers are asked to throw wages, benefits and social security overboard. however, the thin veil of collective belt-tightening, the attitude that we must all share the burden, belies an enduring project of class polarization. hence, rather than viewing the current 1 carlo fanelli and chris hurl are phd candidates (abd) in the department of sociology & anthropology with a specialization in political economy. janus-faced austerity: strengthening the ‘competitive’ canadian state 30 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research responses to ‘economic’ crisis as somehow marking a break with neoliberalism, government stimulus policies reflect a profound continuity and further entrenchment of past strategies of privatization, creating openings for capital and public sector spending restraint. in this paper, we will argue that the current round of austerity measures advanced by the harper conservatives is janus-faced: on the one hand public services, social programs, labour and environmental supports and protections are being ‘rolled back’ for the working class, while state supports are ‘rolled out’ to serve the needs of capital. in so doing, harper is showing no hesitation to use the coercive power of the federal government to centralize policies and institutional arrangements that appease business interests. after briefly tracing the theoretical presuppositions of neoliberalism and the realignment of governance at intersecting scales of operation, we situate the continuing assault on public services and organized labour by drawing attention to what we refer to as capital-preserving federalism. as a political and economic strategy, capital-preserving federalism provides a means of imposing constraints upon newly elected federal governments and sub-national constituent-units’ (e.g. provinces, municipalities) ability to bypass market access to goods and services, in addition to restrictions upon withdrawing or opting-out of trade and investment agreements negotiated supra-nationally2. in other words, successive federal governments have firmly fixed the parameters of reform to meet the needs of capital accumulation3. while this dynamic is advanced on a federal level, it entails the enforcement of market-dependence through multi-scaler, multi-spatial and multi-temporal institutional and legal arrangements, as well as corresponding shifts in socio-cultural and political practices. this entails the marketization of public goods and services, the re-regulation of capital controls such as foreign direct investment (fdi), and the creation of new institutional arrangements under the auspices of ‘scarcity’ and ‘restraint’. what’s more, this entails a missionary faith in balanced budgets, fiscal discipline and monetary policy. 2 ‘capital-preserving’ federalism represents an effort on our part to develop a corrective to the concept of “market-preserving” federalism. while we cannot enter into a full analysis here, we base our critique on three main propositions. first, the notion of market-preserving federalism reifies the ‘market’ as if functioning by autonomous laws of supply and demand disembedded from broader social relations. second, this mystification serves to obscure fundamentally antagonistic class relations where the extraction of surplus-value takes place at the detriment of labour for the benefit of capital. third, in naturalizing social relations of capital, takes for granted the liberal dichotomization of the economic and political spheres of social life, while--incorrectly we might add—treating the state and market as competitors as opposed to mutually reinforcing. see, for example, weingast, 1995; yingyi & weingast, 1996; mckinnon, 1997). 3 while not employing the notion of capital-preserving federalism, anderson (2010) outlines similar processes at work. for instance, in 2000 brazil adopted a fiscal responsibility law that constrains both federal and state governments, with limits on spending for government employees, public debt, expenditures and short-term spending in election years. the federal government can withhold transfers to states when they do not comply and criminal proceedings can be brought against elected officials. similar examples include argentina, mexico, nigeria, russia, south africa and belgium for example. see anderson, 2010. 31 as we will attempt to show throughout, this is reflected in the federal government’s most recent stimulus policies. these policies impose restraint measures on the public sector while ceding fiscal control and authority over domestic policies away from local governments and communities toward political and economic elites. for this reason, the response to the current economic crisis entails the ‘rolling back’ of certain state activities, such as social programs and capital controls, and the ‘rolling out’ of new institutions and governmentalities that aim to stabilize neoliberal accumulation strategies (peck and tickell, 2002). while the federal government’s janus-faced strategy is significant, this by no means marks the beginning of a new era. as thomas workman (2009, p.7) has recently reminded: “these institutional constellations evolve very slowly over decades of class struggle.” in fact, the adoption of federal stimulus policies should be viewed in continuity with past neoliberal projects. the issue, then, in our view is what these multi-level arrangements and institutions do and on whose behalf? in other words, it’s a class question. in what follows, we argue that the federal conservative government has taken advantage of the current economic crisis and the regulatory, administrative and institutional powers of the state in order to facilitate planning, underwrite expansions, take on liabilities and contain class conflict. in other words, political and economic agents, via institutional arrangements and socio-cultural practices (i.e. “the market”), work through the state utilizing their positions of power to simultaneously cut services, while extending others to suit the valorization needs of capital. while we focus our analysis on the federal government, as this special forum in alternate routes suggests, this is a pattern being generalized across the country and around the world. theorizing neoliberalism: realigning governance to facilitate capital accumulation in the wake of the economic crisis of the mid-1970s, neoliberalism emerged as a response to the failure of the post-war keynesian welfare state to sustain capital accumulation. with the unprecedented profit rates of the 1950s and 60s faltering due to the rebuilding of western europe’s and japan’s productive capacities, increased competition from emergent economies in latin america and asia, rising militancy on the part of the working classes and especially trade unions, in addition to increasingly aggressive cold war geopolitics, a ruling class coup d’état was launched to reestablish higher rates of profit. with an adherence to neoclassical economics and classical liberalism, neoliberalism emerged in the 1970s as a comprehensive set of political and economic practices intent on reordering state administrations, creating new profit opportunities for businesses, imposing labour market discipline janus-faced austerity: strengthening the ‘competitive’ canadian state 32 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research and a prioritization of ‘finance’ capital over industrial or fixed capital4. a central aspect of this process has been the realignment of governance: unloading the costs of social services onto the individual and compelling diverse communities to compete with one another for ‘scarce’ resources under an institutional framework of private property, free markets and free trade, while continuing to slash taxes for the wealthy, marketizing all aspects of life, and selling off public assets at bargain basement prices. this entails a variety of cross-penetrating strategies that reconfigure the jurisdiction of markets across intersecting scales of governance, revamp institutional responsibilities and encourage socio-cultural changes around four central processes. first, neoliberalism presupposes the ongoing and active separation of people from the means of subsistence, cultivating dependency on market mechanisms in areas of life previously outside of the market. second, under neoliberalism, class solidarities are actively decomposed through the individuation of the labour process and service-provision, increasingly rendering individuals responsible for their own self-management and pitting them against one another for ‘scarce’ resources. third, neoliberalism cultivates short-term speculation, aspiring to transform every aspect of life into an investment opportunity. fourth, this entails the reconfiguration of the labour market away from a stable, skills-based labour force and toward temporary, contract-based labour arrangements that encourage competition between the private and public spheres. internationally, ‘globalization’ is the neoliberal face of a worldwide strategy that aims toward the creation of new zones of accumulation through increasingly authoritarian state apparatuses that seek to entrench market imperatives and reduce the power of labour (saad-filho & johnston, 2005). this includes: lowering and eliminating tariffs on imported goods, the removal of restrictions on foreign direct investment, domestic quotas and monopolies, an export-led growth strategy, the reregulation of domestic capital markets, as well as the weakening of environmental and labour laws, for example, which are seen as market impediments. this does not simply entail deregulation and dismantlement of the institutions of the keynesian welfare state. in fact, as peck and tickell (2002) note, there has been a shift from the ‘roll-back’ neoliberalism of the 1980s to an “emergent phase of 4 in our view, finance capital is not merely speculative or parasitic, nor the result of the stagnation tendencies of advanced capitalist economies. rather, what makes finance unique in its neoliberal form is its coalescing with industry, as well as leadership role. in other words, financial volatility actually becomes a developmental feature of neoliberalism that reinforces, rather than undermines the central position of finance-led neoliberalism and capitalist power structures. for instance, while finance may speculate in global money markets or bundle and repackage a host of derivative trading forms, a good many transactions are more often than not based on some form of real assets and commodity production. moreover, finance has been central to the disciplining of industry and the working class through the availability of credit and reinvestments in mortgages, pensions and loans. though neoliberalism was from its very beginning a project intent on restoring ruling class power, it went beyond this thoroughly integrating and subordinating the working classes into its dependent orbit. for a fuller exposition, see albo, gindin and panitch, 2010. 33 active state-building and regulatory reform” which they describe as “roll out” neoliberalism through the 1990s. while the crisis of the 1970s entailed wages freezes and dramatic austerity budgets, over the past twenty years governments have moved toward a more proactive position in unfolding new institutional frameworks that facilitate a deepening project of class polarization under the rubric of ‘scarcity’ and ‘restraint’. despite the political and ideological antagonism toward state ‘interference’ in the market, state intervention is central to securing the political, economic and social conditions necessary for accumulation such as the privatization of stateowned industries and utilities, the opening of its banking, healthcare, education and telecommunications systems to private ownership, in addition to competing international pensions and mutual funds. domestically, neoliberalism seeks to deepen and intensify internal competition among competing business interests, thereby pitting workers and workplaces in competition with one another through ever-increasing market compulsions. this includes efforts to contract-out and privatize provincial and municipal services, extract concessions from its unionized and non-unionized workforce, in addition to an increased reliance on public-private partnerships (p3’s). central banks are envisaged as inflation fighters, with an inflation control regime of between one and three percent. provincially, and as creatures of the provinces, municipally, neoliberal policies have sought to shift the burden of taxes from businesses to consumers for competitiveness, slash social services and liquidate assets. in order to become more ‘flexible’ and ‘leaner’ in a globalizing economy, provinces and cities have increasingly responded with attempts to move away from the universal provision of social services to marketized provisions with attached user-fees, enhanced inter-jurisdictional competition and sought a confrontational approach with unions, which have aimed to reorient accumulation strategies and to concentrate capital in metropolitan cores, which serve international markets (albo, 1994; kipfer & keil, 2002; tufts, 2004). the most recent emphasis on austerity and balanced budgets, however, is counteracted by growing state involvement in creating new spaces for accumulation. in confronting the growing indebtedness of the state, an all out offensive is launched against remaining social provisions and universal entitlements, thereby tipping the balance of class forces away from labour and toward creditors and locally dominant capitalist coalitions with alliances to the us ruling-class. in this manner, politicians, economists and policy-makers ensconced in the neoliberal doctrine were successful in moving the terrain of debate from the realm of production whereby labour and capital struggled over the control of the working-day and the appropriation of surplus-value, to the terrain of distribution and exchange thereby strengthening the alliance between capital and the state. janus-faced austerity: strengthening the ‘competitive’ canadian state 34 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research as the always global scope of capital accumulation and the persistent need for more domestic and local forms of ‘extra-market’ (i.e. legal, juridical, political, repressive) supports enmeshed, rather than ceding power away from the nation-state neoliberalism created new and shifting scales of governance each with an historically unique dynamism. this includes, for instance, the devolution of regulating responsibilities onto local governments without matching fiscal supports or a proportional transfer of power, while also scaling regulatory capacities ‘upwards’ to regional or international institutions (brenner, 2004). likewise, efforts to extend and consolidate neoliberalism have centered on attempts to: reduce the power of organized labour through market disciplining; the commodification and marketization of the state through measures that promote ‘competitive austerity’; reducing welfare disincentives to work; promoting the massive encouragement of part-time, precarious and contingent forms of service-sector employment; recklessly opening-up goods and capital markets to international competition; as well as disproportionately cutting taxes for higher-income earners and businesses, while moving-away from the social provision of universal programs to consumption-based levies (albo, 1993; clarke, 2005; brenner & theodore, 2002; mcbride, 2005). for organized labour this has meant the institutionalization of policies that aim to make it easier to decertify unions, unilaterally proclaim them “essential” and thereby removing the right to strike, as well as the increased use of coercive back-to-work legislation. all things considered, then, the capitalist classes have used the economic recession and the rhetoric of ‘fiscal consolidation’, ‘prudent business management’ and ‘government responsibility” as a strategic political opportunity to strengthen and expand processes of neoliberalism—from the urban to the international—through the state and market. under the guise of new public management mantras, there has been a retreat from the provision of social services through a stable, full-time labour force, increasingly toward part-time, seasonal and short-term contracts, which are seen as providing a more docile and globally competitive labour force (ilcan et al., 2003). likewise, through reduced social expenditures and long-term investments, all levels of government have sought to shed ‘liabilities’ through attrition, downsizing, leaving vacancies unfilled and retirements. by means of outsourcing, the government is increasingly advanced as a consumer that is responsible for purchasing services rather than actively producing them. this has served to weaken job security, seniority allowances, transfer and promotion opportunities, cost-of-living increases, erode pensions and benefits, in addition to increasing the absolute managerial control over the working-day. indeed, a renewed assault on the public-sector, and in particular unionized jobs (as we argue below), will likely come down hardest on racial35 ized groups and women since not only has this been where many have made the most gains but also because they are likely to see increases in the unpaid sphere of social life and reproduction. all things considered, we now turn to a discussion of the particular ways in which the election of prime minister stephan harper’s federal conservatives have acted to preserve the mobility and power of capital, while subordinating and intensifying pressures for the working-class. ‘constitutionalizing’ neoliberalism: integrating the ‘competitive’ logic of the state the current economic crisis has provided a calculated political and economic opportunity for the federal government to simultaneously ‘roll back’ its commitment to the provision of social services, while at the same time ‘rolling out’ institutions and social policies that are oriented towards the cultivation of new channels for accumulation. the measures advanced by the federal government are by no means based on austerity or restraint, but on expanding and deepening opportunities for capital valorization unburdened by the costs of social infrastructure. welfare state retrenchment and tight fiscal constraints go hand in hand with irresponsible tax cuts and spectacular mega projects. as the immediacy of the financial crisis recedes and governments around the world restrict spending, with the most dramatic conflicts over public goods and services occurring in europe, these so-called ‘exit strategies’ are attempting to re-establish liberalized financial systems and reconstruct the neoliberal policy framework and dominance of the market in regulating economic output and distribution. it is important, therefore, to begin by identifying some of the features of these so-called exit strategies being adopted by the harper government in canada, particularly with respect to fiscal policies, given that fiscal austerity is likely to be a flashpoint of political struggles in the coming period. from his very first budget speech in 2006, titled “restoring fiscal balance in canada”, harper demonstrated his hard-line commitment to constitutionalism in the conservatives proposal for a stricter separation of responsibilities by cutting federal social programs that would fall under the auspices of the provinces. almost immediately after coming to power, prime minister harper slashed the goods and services tax (gst) from 7 percent to 6 and later 5 percent in an attempt to attract investment and spur economic development. the conservatives devoted the canadian state to “competitive and efficient” economic policies and proposed plans to harmonize the tax system. meanwhile, they moved quickly to scrap plans for a non-profit, centre-based, affordable national child care program that had been negotiated by the liberals with the provinces and territories and replaced it with the universal child care benefit that saw families on janus-faced austerity: strengthening the ‘competitive’ canadian state 36 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research welfare, the working poor and modest-income families netting between $600 and $951 per annum; nowhere near close enough to cover the costs of childcare or to allow a parent to stay at home (batte et al, 2006; bezanson, 2010). a short time thereafter, the 2007 global financial meltdown plunged the international political economy into the most significant crisis of accumulation since the great depression. in an act of political brinkmanship, soon after fixing federal election dates to every four years prime minister harper called a snap election breaking his own election promise in the hope of gaining a clear majority. while this did not happen, the biggest losers in the election were the liberals who had lost twenty-six seats; two-thirds of which were redistributed to the conservatives and the remainder to the ndp. meanwhile, governments of all stripes the world over responded with unprecedented levels of stimulus funding. the harper conservatives, long a sanctuary for fiscal hawks, likewise responded with stimulus spending. the centerpiece of the 2009 budget, titled “canada’s economic action plan”, injected $64 billion over two years toward infrastructure spending, personal income tax cuts and the ‘securitization’ (or preemptive bailout) of state-backed mortgage and insurance agencies. harper’s government, which since late-2006 required all provinces to consider the p3 route as a condition for receiving federal infrastructure money and in 2007 created the aggressive public-private partnerships canada crown corporation, was using its fiscal leverage as a source of cost-sharing and the economic crisis as a pretext to promote p3 projects nationally (see loxley, 2010). this is in spite of the fact that a growing number of studies indicate that the privatization of formerly public services is often no more efficient or less costly than traditional approaches to service delivery (loxley, 2010; armstrong et al, 2001; mackenzie, 2004). despite exceptional amounts of stimulus spending, however, the harper government has remained steadfastly committed neoliberals. with the two year stimulus spending coming to an end and economic “recovery” allegedly underway, harper’s conservatives are looking to halve their deficits by 2013 under the euphemism of “fiscal consolidation”, otherwise known as austerity. with an estimated deficit of nearly $56 billion for 2010-11 that is expected to remain well into 2013-2014, and a forecast debt-to-gdp ratio of about 34-35 percent, this is nowhere near the 25 percent threshold when the books were balanced. however, the state of the federal budget is by no means dire, when taking into consideration the record $14 billion surplus that harper inherited from an earlier decade of liberal austerity. in addition, prior to the onset of the current crisis, canada’s debt at 32.3 percent of national gdp was at its lowest in more than a quarter century given the largest payments in canadian history and federal law that requires all surpluses to be used to pay down the national debt and not for new spending initiatives. 37 in an effort to rebalance the books, the most recent speech from the throne (march 3, 2010) suggests that, rather than depart from neoliberal austerity and monetary policy, harper’s conservatives are seeking to further expand and intensify them. in other words, a private-sector crisis is being shifted onto the public sector and the power of finance capital is emerging stronger than ever. in their blatantly ideological quest to return to balanced budgets, harper’s conservatives—no less aided by the federal liberals and new democratic party—have turned their attention toward an aggressive strategy premised on public sector austerity and private sector prosperity. for instance, hidden deep in the 2010 budget is a technical change to tax regulations that aim to entice fdi through the weakening of domestic constraints. the budget removes restrictions that foreign investors, especially venture capitalists and private-equity funds, face in selling shares in canadian firms. this change to section 116 of the income tax act effectively eliminates the need for tax reporting to the canada revenue agency (cra). previously, the cra required investors to disclose details of the sale for approval in the case that taxes needed to be paid. as a result, rather than repatriate any capital gains, investors kept the proceeds of the sale in canadian accounts for fear of taxation. as of the speech, these restrictions have been for the most part eliminated (viera, 2010). touting the alleged benefits of the change, finance minister flaherty recently remarked, “[t]he best way to build a more competitive economy is to create an environment that allows the entrepreneurs who employ so many canadians to succeed and expand—not an environment that stands in the way of their success with high taxes and red tape” (department of finance, 2010). of course, flaherty failed to mention that these changes are expected to cost ottawa $130-million in lost revenue over five-years. meanwhile, in all areas but defense spending which has increased 37% since 2000-2001, government operating expenditures have been frozen for two-years, which given inflation means real cuts. the conservatives have recently pledged $9 billion to build jails for criminals who do not exist, spent $1.1 billion on turning toronto into a militarized city for the recent g8/g20 meetings and promised another $16 billion for f-35 fighter jets for fighting ‘terrorism’ abroad. finance minister jim flaherty has also suggested that there are some opportunities for the privatization of crown assets, including real estate and the outsourcing of public contracts. in particular, the conservatives are taking aim at atomic energy canada ltd., seeking to open-up canada posts’ procurement of overseas mail, and grant the minister of the environment unilateral powers to waive environmental assessments. in seeking to create new clusters of accumulation, environmental regulations in the arctic have been ‘streamlined’ for oil and mining companies to drill, while federal environmental assessment reports have been removed from the purview of the canadian environmental agency to the busijanus-faced austerity: strengthening the ‘competitive’ canadian state 38 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research ness-friendly national energy board. this continues the removal of environmental initiatives by the conservatives made most explicit by harper’s dismissal of the kyoto protocol as a “socialist scheme” designed to suck money from the rich countries. the weakening of social provisions, labour and environmental laws has been paralleled by new spending as harper has further concentrated federal stimulus monies in the energy, resource and construction industries. certainly new public spending is gravely needed given canada’s crumbling infrastructure (estimated at over $123 billion) and the fact that total public investment as a percentage of gdp has fallen from between two and three percent in the 1960s and 70s to about 0.5 percent by the 1990s (mackenzie, 2004); however this spending has not been equally distributed among the various segments of the canadian labour market, nor racial and gender neutral (ontario health coaltion, 2008; armstong et al, 2001; opseu, 2007). attacks against the poor, refugee claimants, temporary workers, live-in caregivers, and non-status persons are increasing as the blatant power of the federal state is summoned to service capital, while abandoning any responsibilities to labour (thomas, 2010; hussan and scott, 2009; teelucksingh & galabuzzi, 2005; galabuzzi, 2006; paz, 2008). indeed, recent research by kathleen lahey (2009) suggests that women have received only about 7 percent to 22 percent of stimulus funding, since men tend to predominate in the construction, mining and forestry industries. the bulwark of stimulus spending has been untargeted without any long-term planning, community involvement or proactive infrastructural spending, going mainly toward existing backlogs as opposed to rethinking development and the spatial development of where we live and work. the federal conservatives have continued to ‘slash and burn’ funding for equity seeking groups such as the status of women, or groups critical of israeli state policies such as kairos, and have in the process punished those that dare to criticize their policies. for example, a short-list of recent harper controversies includes what have (arguably) been labeled ‘politically-motivated’ removals such as the dismissal of openly critical and outspoken veterans ombudsman pat strogran, chief superintendent marty cheliak a strong supporter of the long-gun registry, former president of the canadian nuclear safety commission linda keen who shut down the chalk river nuclear facility over safety concerns, chair of the military complaints commission peter tinsley who was investigating the controversial transfer of afghan detainees and, most recently, chief statistician at statistics canada munir sheikh who resigned after the mandatory long-form census was scrapped in favour of a voluntary survey, which has been harshly criticized by a plethora of academics, think tanks, politicians, community groups and other levels of government. in addition, this includes last year’s prorogation (the fourth time in three years) of parliament for more than two months amid speculation of a coalition liberal-ndp, the helena guergis 39 affair, the dismissal of the arts and cultural community, alleged spending favouritism for conservative ridings, a foreign aid policy that denies funding for abortion services, a bold-faced 802 page omnibus or “dumpster” bill bulging with disparate issues, and public attacks targeting employment equity and affirmative action for federal employees. put into perspective, then, this can be understood as none other than an act of capitalist militancy on behalf of and in accordance with the state. a renewed round of austerity under the banner of “fiscal prudence” has led new president of the treasury board, the main cabinet committee responsible for the administration and operations of the federal civil service, stockwell day, to suggest that public-sector unions need to ‘share the pain’. this was a thinly veiled reference to the concessions extracted by private-sector unions from gm, ford, chrysler and vale-inco, for example, as well as the political failures and public resentment of striking public-sector workers from toronto and ottawa to windsor and vancouver (rosenfeld, 2009; albo et al, 2010; fanelli and paulson, 2009). stimulus and restraint go hand-in-hand: capital-preserving tax cuts cause deficits that then need to be resolved, which translates into social cuts and wage restraint for the working-class and a vicious circle of more tax cuts to spur business investment further eroding the fiscal base. for instance, over the next five years federal workers will subsidize corporate tax-cuts by $6.8-billion in transfers extracted through wage-freezes and job cuts, which will total nearly $21-billion. oddly, though, a great percentage of canadian federal tax-cuts will flow directly right back into the us treasury, which taxes its companies the difference between foreign taxes and domestic ones in order to stimulate internal production and slow outsourcing (weir, 2009). the recently negotiated “buy american” deal gives permanent and unrestricted foreign access to publicly funded contracts. this is an historical deed as it is the first time canadian governments have agreed to open procurement contracts to bids by other world trade organization members since the 1988 free trade agreement. this is particularly confusing as only about 2 percent of us federal stimulus funding, that is, about $4-5-billion of $275-billion, remains. still worse, canada and the european union are in trade negotiations to enact what the trade justice network, an alliance comprised of labour and social justice groups, has argued would be the largest, most intrusive free trade deal that canada has ever entered into and is progressing quite quickly with little public scrutiny (trade justice network). according to a recent study by scott sinclair (2010, p.3) of the canadian centre for policy alternatives (ccpa): the ceta [comprehensive economic and trade agreement] also will have an adverse impact on public services, especially those provided by local, territorial and provincial governments. the agreement would promote and entrench new forms of commercialization, janus-faced austerity: strengthening the ‘competitive’ canadian state 40 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research especially pub lic-private partnerships. it would also prohibit governments from setting performance require ments that oblige foreign investors or service pro viders to purchase locally, transfer technology or train local workers. the combined impact of its investment, services and procurement rules would make it far more difficult to reverse failed privatizations. the austerity agenda of the federal government has entailed the drastic reconfiguration of public services as canada is essentially offering to make commitments at the federal, provincial and municipal tiers that go beyond nafta and the wto, opening up services and investments, domestic regulation and standards, public procurement contracts and intellectual property rights (mcbride, 2005; johnson and mahon, 2005). foreign multinationals could potentially gain unprecedented access to municipal water services, while the demand for local offsets, the most important leverage that towns and cities have, such as local purchasing of goods and services or labour reinvestments, may no longer be permitted. in seeking to ‘constitutionalize’ neoliberalism, canada is pushing to include a nafta-like investor-state dispute mechanism that would allow european companies to sue any tier of government should they enact policies that cut into profits. in effect this could nullify and void, for example, fair wage policies and ethical strategies enacted by some provinces and cities, in addition to ceding authority and control over domestic policies away from local governments and communities to business elites whose profit interests trump all others. the ceta, in particular, takes aim at ontario’s green energy act, which offers grants and exemptions for cleaner energy sources and local job creation. toronto’s “buy local” food policy which has committed to increasing the amount of locally procured food served at city owned facilities and the celebrated ‘living wage’ in new westminster, for instance, could be prohibited. for months ahead of the g8/g20 meetings in toronto, the federal government had been lobbying world leaders to block proposals for a global bank tax for g20 members to be used as a slush fund for expected future bailouts and to prevent banks from shifting to jurisdictions with lower taxes. in an effort to convince g20 member states otherwise, harper touted the stability of the canadian banks, which he misleadingly promoted as not requiring a bailout similar in kind to those in the u.s. and european union. this praise however is both unjustified and dubious, when in fact canadian banks received upwards of $200 billion—that is more than the initial $700 billion bailout in the u.s. as a percentage of gdp—not to mention a host of additional accounting trickery that kept the ‘real’ costs of the bank bailouts out of the books (dobbin, 2010; stanford, 2010; campbell, 2009). in fact, stephan harper has recently gone as far as to say this would “punish” and be 41 “unfair” to canadian banks that, in the midst of the crisis in 2007, racked in nearly $20 billion in profits, and which have since had a field day buying up insolvent american banks. successful with their propaganda, the conservatives managed to persuade g20 leaders to forego a bank tax and, instead, convinced them to commit to a unified push for austerity pledging to halve their deficits by 2013. in canada, the potential class-based consequences are clear. with tens of thousands of baby-boomers expected to retire in the next decade, dwindling revenues and rising social services costs are expected to compound the budget fiasco. considering the twin perils of a falling birth rate and increasing retirements, parliamentary budget officer kevin page has warned that a shrinking tax-base coupled with increasing usage of health care and service benefits will lead to higher government costs and therefore an uncertain fiscal future (campion-smith, 2010). the changing demographics of the canadian labour market is expected to increase by 7 percent the number of retired people compared to those still in the workforce in the next ten years: that’s nearly as much as it grew in the last forty years. wait another ten years and the estimated cost to rectify this dilemma rises from $20 billion to $30 billion as nearly 40 percent of federal service workers are expected to retire in the next five years. in response, page has argued that permanent fiscal actions are needed either through significant tax-hikes, serious cuts in social spending, or some combination of both. unfortunately though, while understanding and analyzing the changing demographics of the canadian labour market is crucial, such uncertainty often invokes alarmist exclamations on the need to shrink the public sector and shed ‘liabilities’ (such as that which is currently happening throughout the eurozone, especially around health care and pension reform). true to form and typifying the inherent short-sightedness of neoliberal ideologues, finance minister flaherty’s spokesperson, crisholm potheier, called page’s warnings an “academic exercise” before dismissing it by replying that “canadians expect the government to focus on today’s fragile economic recovery”. despite harper’s dutiful allegiance to capital-preserving federalism, however, the conservatives continue to remain under pressure from business interests and corporate lobbyists, such as canadian federation of independent businesses president catherine swift, to withdraw health benefits and pension supports. in a letter to the federal pension review panel, swift stressed the need to do something about the “large and growing disunity between the pension benefits of private and public employees” stressing that the public sector should follow the lead of the private sector which the market will reward appropriately, in addition to urging the government to raise the retirement age beyond 65 (whittington, 2010). in making these remarks, swift was implying that unionized workers are overly compensated janus-faced austerity: strengthening the ‘competitive’ canadian state 42 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research and to be blamed for causing the deep economic downturn. more to the point, it is likely that the key reason swift was encouraging part-time seniors to re-join the labour force was because they remain one of the most ‘easily’ exploitable subsets in the labour market as they are often seen as flexible, part-time, easily disposable and unlikely to demand higher wages and benefits since many are under duress and relying on their meager earnings given inadequate pensions, social supports and rising living costs. contrary to swift’s exaggerated remarks, nearly two-thirds of all canadian workers lack a workplace pension and over 1.6-million seniors get by on less than $15,000 per year. according to the public service alliance of canada (psac, 2010), in 2008 the average federal civil service pension was just over $23,000, which pales in comparison with the “diamond encrusted” pensions and retirement packages for c-level executives (e.g. chief financial and executive officers). furthermore, as toby sanger (2010) of the canadian union of public employees (cupe) has recently shown, total public spending dropped to its lowest since 1974 to about 36 percent of the economy in 2007 while total government revenues from taxes, on the other hand, dropped to less than 32 percent of the economy in 2009, its lowest since 1985. in fact, federal program spending fell from 17.2 percent of gdp in the early-1990s to 11.7 percent by the end of the decade (loxley, 2010). likewise, from 1990-2008, the share of total government spending in the economy has been reduced by 20 percent which, when considering that the federal government plans to cut its corporate tax on income from 18 percent to 15 percent leading to a decline in revenue by $20 billion over the next five-years, may spell long-term budget trouble. with inflation expected to rise 1.7 percent in 2010 and 2 percent or more in 2011, together with the ever-present fear of rating agencies downgrading the federal aaa status, which would lead to vast increases in interest payments and thereby increasing canada’s dependence on foreign capital injections, canada is by no means out of the global slump. as of january 2010, 380,000 more people are unemployed and 270,000 fewer people are employed than 15-months earlier. with the canadian dollar near parity with the us dollar, canada’s manufacturing sector continues to suffer from both the increased penetration of imports and the difficulty of trying to compete in foreign markets, which are either strategically subsidized or draw their ‘competitive advantage’ by poverty-wages or externalizing costs onto the environment. despite productivity output per employee rising by more than 37 percent between 19802005, real wages in canada have been generally stagnant since at least 1982, despite the lowest levels of unemployment since the 1970s prior to the recent economic crisis. there has been an inverse relationship, then, between productivity growth 43 and real wages. in an effort to maintain modest living standards workers have increased their hours of work, emptied their savings, added family members to the workforce, and took on huge debt loads by borrowing against their homes and accepting multiple credit cards. recent job data suggests that a significant majority of newly created jobs are often 10 percent lower than the average wage of the jobs lost, with 20 percent having lost their pension plan by changing jobs (bernard & galarneau, 2010; sanger, 2010b). emerging amidst such blatantly janus-faced austerity is a quest to return to the same old orthodoxy of neoliberalism. under the auspices of ‘spiraling’ budget deficits, growing unemployment and low capacity utilization, conservatives have used the crisis to attack the various segments of the working class, in particular those unionized, to lower wages, extract concessions and increase profits, thereby further indebting ‘consumers’ and leaving them more precarious and with less time to spare than ever. in turn, this further undermines federal fiscal capacities in an attempt to return to a mythical era of unbridled “free market” capitalism and proverbial small government. the urge to curtail unsustainable spending, therefore, obscures capitalist militancy. while working class incomes have either stagnated or declined over the past thirty years, the wealthiest members of society have enjoyed unprecedented gains. while in 1995 the average executive compensation of the top 50 ceo’s in canada was eighty-five times that of the average worker, by 2007 it was two-hundred and fifty-nine times that (mcnally, 2009). likewise, the income share taken by the top 0.1 percent of income earners in canada approached 5 percent by the mid-1990s, a level unseen since the 1930s and early years of wwii. the personal savings rate that was nearly 20.2 percent of disposable income in 1982 had plummeted to 2 percent by 2005 (baragar, 2009). indeed, 2009 marked the highest-ever debt-to-income ratio of 145 percent in canada. the vanier institute of the family found that the average canadian household debt climbed to $96,000 while compared with 2008 mortgages 90-days or more overdue had risen by 50 percent, and the number of credit card holders at least 90-days arrears was up 40 percent. the report also went on the suggest that there is a looming housing bubble in canada as prices toward the end of 2009 rose to about $340,000, which is about five-times the average aftertax income of canadian homes. the long-term trend is just over three and one-halftimes that (sauve, 2010). a sudden rise in interest rates, changes in mortgage terms and the bitter realization that current prices are in the long run unsustainable may cause the bubble to burst. as ‘exit strategies’ come to the forefront, contesting the ruinous effects of these policies becomes a central imperative. janus-faced austerity: strengthening the ‘competitive’ canadian state 44 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research where do we go from here? resisting austerity, reestablishing the power of the working class the capitalist classes have used the economic recession as a strategic political opportunity to strengthen and expand processes of neoliberalism through the state and market, and into every aspect of social life. while the federal government proclaims the need to impose wage freezes, sell off public assets, and restructure social services in the face of the baby boom generation’s looming retirement, this is by no means driven simply by restraint. in fact, just as the federal government has advanced austerity in the face of new spending, it has also pursued massive tax cuts for corporations and the wealthy, rolling out new institutional structures that facilitate the increasing mobility of capital, and utilizing stimulus as a way of subsidizing the burgeoning construction and energy sector. in this context, new government spending does not spell out a return to keynesian policies, but is rather symptomatic of a deepening program of class polarization. how can this be challenged? how may social movements adapt? is the ndp a viable alternative? how can labour unions be pushed in a positive manner? the struggle over austerity cannot be limited to its federal expression as issues related to service retrenchment and the increasing penetration of neoliberal policies manifests throughout the provinces and municipalities. likewise, in an increasingly intertwined global political economy, national and sub-national decisions cannot be abstracted from their international context. while exit strategies targeting the public sector are emerging unconcealed in their aggressiveness and vigor, canadian responses have so far been tepid. the capitalist class is recomposing and repositioning itself to make the public pay, spread the risk and hoard the gains. the shape taken by struggles over austerity and social services may very well dictate the next round of accumulation or, alternatively, lead to something historically unique. indeed, a good many predictions already suggest a looming ‘lost decade’ of austerity. new alignments, coalitions and networks will no doubt emerge. more importantly, however, a frank and sober discussion will need to begin that seeks to move beyond the fractured coalition of network politics in hopes of creating something historically unique, all-encompassing and capable of challenging what the working class is collectively up against. the course of neoliberalism has thoroughly beaten down what vestiges remain of trade union militancy and existing social movements must come to the bitter realization of historical defeat. this is the only realistic starting point from which to move forward (anderson, 2000). three decades of neoliberalism have eroded whatever ‘progressive’ remnants of social-democratic and labour parties that exist. the ndp is not an alternative and neither is, regrettably, the green party trapped in erstwhile eco-capitalist “solutions”. both parties have no transformative vision of society, adhere to the eco45 nomic agenda of neoliberalism and display no interest in challenging the logic of capital or the democratic functions of the state. moreover, they remain entrapped in top-down organizational structures with little interest in building mobilizational capacities at the community and grassroots level. finally, when in power they have strayed little from conservative and liberal policies. this is demonstrated time and again in the countless cutbacks and repressive policies of a good many social democratic governments’ over the past three decades (caroll & ratner, 2005). moreoever, organized labour bodies from the canadian labour congress to the ontario federation of labour, canadian auto workers and canadian union of public employees, for instance, have increasingly shown signs of confusion having failed to break ideologically or politically with a social dependence on capital and by their inability to meaningfully intervene in recent battles. great political and social divergences between local’s and their national or provincial affiliates continue to mar the collective bargaining landscape. if worker militancy as demonstrated by workplace stoppages is an indication of growing labour unrest, the 126 workplace stoppages in 2006 (its lowest since 1935) pales in comparison with the historic high of 1,173 in 1974, and indeed paints a grim picture of the state of labour militancy in canada (workman, 2009). by focusing narrowly on workplace gains such as, say, higher wages, the capitalist class and a good many politicians feed off the rhetoric that workplace gains undermine social services. this is a trap that labour gets caught up in when it focuses only on workplace benefits. labour will need to develop counter-narrative strategies and seek to politicize their gains by rooting them in their communities and also in the form of non-economic improvements (paid leave, educationals, etc). unfortunately, instead of inspiring new waves of mass protest, demonstrations and the spawning of new working class organizations, the current global economic insecurity seems to have weakened labour’s resolve and risks signaling its ultimate class defeat. to conclude, the power of capital and the state, as well as the impasse of both organized labour and many social movements to confront what the working class is collectively up against, belies the need for a new kind of radical, anti-capitalist political project suited to the current historical and social conjuncture. new political experiments will need to emerge that aim to incorporate the strongest elements of the traditional party, trade unions, social movements and community groups. in this regard, the left may due well to study the growing brashness of political and economic elites as they reconfigure and reorganize themselves to seize the crisis. nevertheless, the european anti-austerity protests and emergent anti-capitalist projects may provide a glimmer of optimism. what is certain is that the failure to take up such a challenge to reestablish the power of the working class in canada would be to accept the existing social relations as unalterable and would therefore recognize the right of capital to exploit labour. janus-faced austerity: strengthening the ‘competitive’ canadian state 46 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research references albo, g. (1993). the public sector impasse & the administrative question. studies in political economy, 42, 113-127. albo, g. (1994). ‘competitive austerity’ & the impasse of capitalist employment policy. socialist register, 30, 144-170. albo, g., s. gindin., and l. pantich. (2010). in and out of crisis: the global financial meltdown and left alternatives. oakland, california: spectre pm press. anderson, p. (2000). renewals. new left review, 2 (1), 5-24. anderson, g. (2010). fiscal federalism: a comparative introduction. oxford: oxford university press. armstrong, p., amaratunga, c., bernier, j., grant, k., pederson, a., and k. willson (eds.). (2001). exposing privatization: women and health care reform in canada. aurora, ontario: garamond press. baragar, f. & m. seccareccia. (2008). financial restructuring: implications of recent canadian macroeconomic developments. studies in political economy, 82, 61-83. baragar, f. canada & the crisis. (2009). in guard, j. & w. antony (eds.), bankruptcies & bailouts (pp.77-106). halifax: fernwood. battle, k., s. torjman, m. mendelson, and e. tamagno. (2007). mixed brew for the ‘coffee shop’ budget. ottawa: caledon institute of social policy. bernard, a., and d. galarneau. (2010). layoffs in canada. statistics canada. retreived on august 7, 2010 from, http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/75-001-x/2010105/article/11161-eng.htm. bezanson, k. (2010). “childcare delivered through the mailbox:” social reproduction, choice, and neoliberalism in a theo-conservative canada. in braedley, s. and m. luxton (eds.), neoliberalism and everyday life (pp.90-112) montreal & kingston: mcgill-queens university press. brenner, n. & n. theodore (eds.). (2002). spaces of neoliberalism: urban restructuring in north america & western europe. oxford: blackwell. brown, l. (31, march 2010). public sector workers paying for corporate tax cuts. national union of public and general employees. retrieved on april 12 2010, from, http://www.nupge.ca/content/public-sector-workers-paying-corporate-tax-cuts. campbell, b. (2009). the global economic crisis and its canadian dimension. canadian centre for policy alternatives. retrieved online on june 7, 2010 from, http://www.policyalternatives. ca/publications/monitor/global-economic-crisis-and-its-canadian-dimension. 47 campion-smith, b. (19, february 2010). aging workforce to drive up debt: report. toronto star [online]. retrieved february 25, 2010 from, http://www.thestar.com/business/article/767833--aging-workforce-to-drive-up-debt-report carroll, w.k., & r.s. ratner (eds.). (2005). challenges and perils: social democracy in neoliberal times. nova scotia: fernwood press. clarke, s. (2005). the neoliberal theory of society. in saad-filho, a. & d. johnston (eds.), neoliberalism: a critical reader (pp.50-59). london: pluto press. department of finance. (2010). minister of finance highlights budget measure to cut red tape and boost venture capital for canadian firms. retrieved on september 9, 2010 from, http://www. fin.gc.ca/n10/10-079-eng.asp. dobbin, m. (24 may 2010). the canadian ‘good banks’ myth. the vancouver sun. retrieved on july 30, 2010 from, http://communities.canada.com/vancouversun/blogs/communityofinterest/archive/2010/05/24/the-canadian-good-banks-myth.aspx?commentposted=true#comme ntmessage. fanelli, c., and j. paulson. (2009). municipal malaise: neoliberal urbanism and the future of our cities. the bullet. retrieved on july 1, 2010 from, http://www.socialistproject.ca/bullet/357. php. galabuzi, g.e. (2006). canada’s economic apartheid: the social exclusion of racialized groups in the new century. toronto: canadian scholars’ press. gindin, s. (2010). working peoples assemblies. relay, 30, 24-26. government of canada. (2010). a stronger canada. a stronger economy. now and for the future. retrieved on april 25, 2010 from, http://www.discours.gc.ca/grfx/docs/sft-ddt-2010_e.pdf. hussan, s.k., and m. scott. (2009). jason kenney’s doublespeak exposed: tories unleash canada service border services on migrants. the bullet. retrieved january 8, 2010 from, http://www. socialistproject.ca/bullet/bullet207.html. johnson, r., and r. mahon. nafta: the redesign and rescaling of canada’s welfare state. studies in political economy, 76, 7-30. kipfer, s., and r. keil. (2002). toronto inc? planning the competitive city in the new toronto. antipode, 34 (2), p.227-264. lahey, k. (2009). gender analysis of 2009. progressive economics forum [online]. retrieved january 14, 2010 from http://www.progressiveeconomics.ca/2009/01/31/gender-analysis-ofbudget-2009/. mackenzie, h. (2004). financing canada’s hospitals: alternatives to p3s. retrieved on june 2, 2009 from, http://www.web.net/ohc/p3s.htm#p3reports. janus-faced austerity: strengthening the ‘competitive’ canadian state 48 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research mcbride, s. (2005). paradigm shift: globalization & the canadian state: halifax: fernwood press. mckinnon, i. r. (1997). the logic of market-preserving federalism. virginia law review, 83 (7), p. 1573-1580. mcnally, d. (2009). inequality, the profit-system and the global crisis. in guard, j. & w. antony (eds.), bankruptcies & bailouts (pp. 32-42). halifax: fernwood. noonen, j. (2009). the windsor cupe strike: implications for the labour movement & the left. the bullet. retrieved on october 23, 2009 from, http://www.socialistproject.ca/bullet/ bullet236.html ontario health coaltion. (2008). when public relations trump public accountability: the evolution of cost overruns, service cuts and cover-up in the brampton hospital p3. retrieved on july 14, 2009 from, http://www.web.net/ohc/jan08report%20final.pdf. ontario public service employees union local 479. (2007). risky business ii. retrieved on april 7, 2009 from, http://www.opseu.org/bps/health/p3report.pdf. panitch, l. & d. swartz. (2003). from consent to coercion: the assault on trade union freedoms. aurora, on: garamond press. paz, a. (2008). harvest of injustice: the oppression of migrant workers on canadian farms. the bullet. retreived on may 2, 2009 from, http://www.socialistproject.ca/bullet/bullet117.html. peck, jamie and adam tickell. (2002). neoliberalizing space. antipode, 34 (3): 380-404. public service alliance of canada. (2010). seven myths about public service pensions. retrieved on may 5, 2009 from, http://www.psac-afpc.org/petition-pension/mythes-e.asp. rosenfeld, h. (2009). the north american auto industry in crisis. monthly review, 61 (2),18-36. saad-filho, a. & d. johnston (eds.). (2005). neoliberalism: a critical reader. london: pluto press. qian, y. and r. weingast (1996). china’s transition to markets: market-preserving federalism, chinese style. journal of policy reform, 1, p.149-185. sanger, t. (2010). economic climate for bargaining. canadian union of public employees, 7 (1), 1-15. sanger, t. (2010b). the new grecian formula: still toxic. progressive economics forum. retreived on june 22, 2010 from, http://www.progressive-economics.ca/2010/06/18/the-new-grecianformula-still-toxic/. sauve, r. (2010). the current state of canadian family finances: 2009 report. ottawa: vif. sinclair, s. (2010). negotiating from weakness: canada-eu treaty threatens canadian purchasing policies & public services. canadian centre for policy alternatives. ottawa: ccpa. 49 speech from the throne. (2006). restoring fiscal balance in canada: focusing on priorities. government of canada, budget 2006. retrieved on august 21, 2010 from, http://www.fin.gc.ca/ budget06/pdf/fp2006e.pdf. speech from the throne. (2006). canada’s economic action plan. government of canada, budget 2009. retrieved on august 25, 2010 from, http://www.actionplan.gc.ca/grfx/docs/ecoplan_e. pdf teelucksingh, c., & g.e. galabuzzi. (2005). working precariously: the impact of race and immigrant status on employment opportunities and outcomes in canada. toronto: canadian race relations foundation. thomas, m.p. (2010). labour migration and temporary work: canada’s foreign-worker programs in the “new economy”. in pupo, n. & m.p. thomas (eds.), interrogating the new economy: restructuring work in the 21st century (pp.149-172). toronto: university of toronto press. trade justice network. (2010). fact sheets: overview. retrieved on april 28, 2010 from, http:// www.tradejustice.ca/overview?bl=y. tufts, s. (2004). building the ‘competitive city’: labour and toronto’s bid to host the olympic games. geoforum, 35 (1), p.47-58. veira, p. (5, march 2010). budget foreign investment shift ‘masterstroke’. financial post [online]. retrieved march 6 2010, from http://www.financialpost.com/story.html?id=2647200 warskett, r. (2007). remaking the canadian labour movement: transformed work & transformed labour strategies. in shalla, v. & w. clement (eds.), work in tumultuous times: critical perspectives (pp.380-400). montreal & kingston: mcgill-queens university press. weingast, b. (1995). the economic role of political institutions: market-preserving federalism and economic development. journal of law, economics, & organization, 20 (1), 1-31. weir, e. (2009). the treasury transfer effect. canadian centre for policy alternatives, 10 (7), 1-8. whittington, l. (20, february 2010). tories target civil servants pensions. toronto star [online]. retrieved february 22 2010, from http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/article/768588-tories-target-civil-service-pensions wood, e.m. (2002). the origin of capitalism: a longer view. london: verso. workman, t. (2009). if your in my way, i’m walking: the assault on working people since 1970. halifax: fernwood. janus-faced austerity: strengthening the ‘competitive’ canadian state 50 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research symposium on braverman _ comments by john porter i cannot comment on michael burawoy's paper from the point of view of any of the current "problematiques" of contemporary marxism, since i am not schooled in them. what little i have read does not particularly help me in clarifying the kinds of problems that interest me. but when i first read braverman, i was very much impressed and after rereading large sections of the book for this particular task, i am still very much impressed and i do not make that judgement in terms of his contribution, whatever that may be, to marxian labour economics or marxian sociology. nor is it because what braverman has said is new. most of this compilation of materials studies of work, labour force statistics and other things we knew before. perhaps i was impressed because the book was an articulate reminder of facts we did know but were prepared to overlook, and i use "we" here in the sense of the whole gamut of followers of conventional social science, of the post-second-world war period. i think we were prepared to overlook this evidence because of our overconcern for economic growth as the raison-d'etre of industrialization, and the way we saw worker productivity linked to economic growth. as well we believed consumption to be one of the major goals of the industrialization process. so convinced were we of these objectives, both those in actual work situations and those studying them, that we overlooked much of the change that braverman analyses. certainly social scientists accepted growth and upgrading of the labour force as basic to modernism, and i think the best illustration of that is found in every intergenerational mobility matrix where one compares the marginals of fathers and sons, and takes the difference as representative of progress because overall 23 alternate routes the sons have done better than the fathers. the objective of the exercise in mobility analysis is to discover how respondents have exploited the opportunity provided by occupational upgrading. so we ask whether or not the class structure is permeable, and to what degree. again, the basic assumption underlying analyses of these father-son occupational data, on which i have been engaged myself, is that the overall effects of industrialization have been beneficial and progressive. social scientists, of course, bear this burden of oversight, or guilt depending on how severe one considers the offence to be. i can remember papers back in the fifties in which industrial sociology was being condemned as "cow" sociology, and in which industrial psychology was referred to as deep therapy on the assembly line, so that the picture is not totally one of the social sciences going to work for capitalist enterprise, although i would not deny for a moment that that has been their major thrust. there have always been critics of this direction, however. many of the things said about the degradation of work, or the character of work, have been criticized through various art forms, if not sociology, and certainly taylorism has been subject to ridicule for a very long time. so i would see braverman's contribution as a massive critique of what work has become, whether or not he made any contribution to theory. i think the critique is particularly strong not only because of his analysis of work in the factory, but also because of the extent to which automation and new forms of technology have affected the tertiary sector, as well as the application of science and technology to the work process and the effects they have brought about. also, his observations (he is eclectic here) on the role of education and how it has helped to create the illusion of upgrading 24 symposium on braverman of the contemporary labour force is consistent with other current criticisms of credential ism. his appendix on occupational classifications is fascinating for anybody who has attempted to develop occupational classifications, but more importantly his analysis of the methodology of the prevailing official ones, more than any other part of the book calls into question the notion of an upgraded labour force. all of these things add up to a tremendously powerful critique of how we have looked at work. 25 book review: rosa luxemburg: ideas in action | 261 book review rosa luxemburg: ideas in action by paul frölich, translated by johanna hoornweg. chicago, illinois: haymarket books, 2010. $18 u.s., paper. isbn 97-1-60846-074-8. pages: 1-311. reviewed by tiffany hall1 rosa luxemburg: ideas in action is the intellectual biography of rosa luxemburg and her role in socialist party movements in poland, russia, and germany at the turn of the 20th century. author paul frolich sketches a portrait of a woman who greatly shaped the composition and direction of socialist ideology. the author was himself once a member of the german socialist democratic party and, like luxemburg, was a founding member of the german communist party. these positions allowed for an intimate relationship with luxemburg, giving him access to her incredible character before she died. frölich combines what few writings of luxemburg still exist with other personal and political writings from other party members during that time. by doing so, he constructs a vivid account of luxemburg’s progression through the socialist party system up until her murder in january of 1919. while reading frölich’s book it becomes questionable whether he should have created two separate pieces instead of one: only chapters one and ten speak specifically to luxemburg’s personality and life in a biographical manner. the other chapters, which make up a substantial part of the book, alternatively may have been presented as a history of the socialist party. several chapters are more focused on the relationships between luxemburg, kautsky, mehring, and liebknecth, party members and writers who worked closely with luxemburg and held key positions in the party, and many chapters describe the intricate details large events, such as the russian revolution and the first world war. yet there are few mentions of clara zetkin, who was known to be luxemburg’s most intimate friend. frölich’s decision to create the book as it appears is a testament to the dedication of luxemburg to the socialist cause; separating the two would be disingenuous. thus, those looking specifically for information on luxemburg the individual may be slightly disappointed; her life was too much a part of politics to ignore 1 tiffany hall is an ma candidate in sociology and anthropology at carleton university, ottawa. 262 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism any of her political endeavors in attempting to understand the person she was. for this reason, the book is a much more substantial contribution to understanding the creation and progression of the socialist party. due to her role in the changing nature of the party, luxemburg could not help but have a heavy presence in the discussion of party politics. frölich’s strongest aspect is his detailing of the progression of socialist ideas and movement during the most intense times. for instance, the chapter on the outbreak of the first world war is a substantial contribution to the understanding of the socialist position in germany and prussia at the time. frölich integrates aspects from luxemburg’s writing for pamphlets and articles to highlight the parallels and progression of her ideology. his discussion of her piece the accumulation of capital reveals luxemburg’s process in her own understanding of marxism. he describes the effect it had on understanding imperialism and capitalism and how it changed the approach of the party toward policies for the working class. although the entirety of the book is informative and succinct, the real beauty of frölich’s writing as an author comes to fruition during the last two chapters of the book; the final two months of the german revolution leading up to luxemburg’s murder. frölich describes the creation of the “spartakusbund” and provides many excerpts from the rote fahne, the journal in which luxemburg would write for the final time. frölich points to this time period as the clearest indication of a direct extension of karl marx’s ideas, particularly the communist manifesto. this adds greater emphasis on the importance of luxemburg and her socialist advocacy within historical marxism. in final chapter, frölich reveals the little known facts about luxemburg’s life and character, as well as provides his own opinion on the events leading to her death. the strength of the counter-revolution is seen by frölich as a ‘diabolical plan’ in which luxemburg and her spartans were deliberately dismantled through political guises. frölich’s witness of the decline in mental health following her weakening physical state provides enough speculation for him to ask whether luxemburg was the great leader they believed her to be: “…did her physical strength simply not suffice for the necessary tasks, or did this great leader, who as a theoretician and as a strategist of class struggle moved ahead with such unshakeable inner strength and tenacity, lack that crowning touch of the party leader who can make realistically sound judgments at critical moments irrespective of his mood book review: rosa luxemburg: ideas in action | 263 and who knows how to see to it that his decisions are carried out that crowning touch which became lenin’s second nature. this question, of course, can never be answered” (p.293). frölich’s question is somewhat sorrowful, as he acknowledges that the events led to the rise of the counter-revolution, and to the eventual rise to power of hitler in 1933. overall, frölich’s piece allows for an extensive yet clear description of the creation of the socialist party in prussia, russia, and germany at the turn of the 20th century. this newly translated edition provides greater detail of luxemburg’s life as well as excerpts from her most influential writings, particularly those that had great impact on the socialist party. frölich’s book provides a significant contribution to understanding the progression of the socialist party and, more importantly, to understanding the role luxemburg had in advocating for socialism and the power of the working class. frölich’s book is an important historical contribution to marxist literature and an important tool for understanding past socialist ideologies and the current political landscape. 288 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times book review state power and democracy: before and after the presidency of george w. bush, by andrew kolin. new york, new york: palgrave macmillan, 2010. $85.00 u.s., paper. isbn: 978-0-230-10935-3. 262 pages. reviewed by: brandon tozzo1 did america under george w. bush become a police state? andrew kolin’s book traces the centralization of control in the presidency at the expense of congress and american democracy. kolin argues the extreme security measures taken during the bush administration are not unique in american history, but part of a longer trend to limit democratic institutions and curtail individual rights and freedoms. according to kolin, under the bush presidency america became a police state. the administration used measures to quell opposition through the usa patriot act, and tortured enemy combatants in military prisons. while kolin provides a compelling account of the immoral and–under american law–illegal policies before and during the presidency of george w. bush, the book makes a less persuasive argument that this led to the elimination of domestic american democracy. the first chapters provide a brief historical account of the consolidation of political power in the executive branch. starting in the 19th and early 20th century, the american government used the police to investigate political opponents, such as black rights groups, communists, and women’s rights advocates. with ascendancy of the united states after world war ii, this increased in scope with the formation of the federal bureau of investigations (fbi) and the central intelligence agency (cia). the external threat of the cold war and the conflict in vietnam led to the american executive using the cia and fbi to infringe on the legal rights of american citizens. though many facets of the police state started with nixon in order to repress protest, it has culminated with george w. bush’s response to the terrorist attacks of september 11th, 2001. the strongest part of the book is the evidence that the american executive is allowed free rein to conduct foreign policy. other domestic institutions and social forces such as congress, the media and the public 1  brandon tozzo is a ph. d. candidate in political economy at queen’s university (kingston, ontario, canada). book review: state power and democracy | 289 ignore or are indifferent to the extreme measures taken by american presidents dating back to richard nixon. among the most alarming recent abuses were the use of torture in guantanamo bay and the iraqi abu ghraib prison, and the policy of extraordinary rendition to kidnap foreign nationals. all the while, the presidency insulated itself from criminal liability and congressional oversight. kolin goes into great detail to outline the lack of accountability for the military and the cia when it carries out presidential orders, and the need for substantial changes in the way america conducts its foreign policy. moreover, kolin outlines how american institutions failed to limit the actions of the bush administration in fighting the war on terror, a problem that continues under president obama. however, kolin’s argument that the bush administration has instituted a police state in america is less persuasive. a significant issue is that several key concepts are left unclear throughout the book, such as ‘police state,’ ‘democracy’ and ‘mass democracy’. this is not necessarily problematic–terms and concepts can vary depending on time and location–but there needs more discussion why concepts shift throughout the book. since the definitions are vague, it often obscures their meaning. for example, there is no discussion of why mass democracy movements such as the black panthers and the socialist party are favourable to american democracy, while others such as the religious right and tea party are not, since they are both mass movements albeit with different agendas. also, there is little comparative historical analysis of police states. if the united states has developed into a police state under george w. bush, then some caparison between it and other obvious police states such as maoist china, stalinist russia, and north korea under kim ilsung would have strengthened the book’s analysis and provided a more explicit conceptual framework. more substantively, the bush administration’s elimination of american internal democracy and subversion of the constitution is less convincing when examining contemporary resistance movements in the united states. kolin argues the bush administration took radical measures to eliminate formal democracy in reaction to the september 11th terrorist attacks through the usa patriot act for warrantless wiretaps, and imprisoned and deported over 6000 muslim non-citizens. however many muslims detained after 9/11 returned to the united states and sued the bush administration for compensation. even some of the more controversial pieces of legislation –such as the warrantless wiretaps -have been struck down by the courts showing that formal democracy 290 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times may not have been entirely subverted. such legal recourse does not exist in guantanamo bay or in abu gharib. moreover, despite the actions of the bush presidency to limit dissent, there were mass social movements against the invasion of iraq and throughout his presidency. the book shows the bush administration did go too far restricting liberties in the war on terror against enemy combatants, but there was more domestic dissent than presented. many social groups and formal institutions such as activist groups, the courts, congress and the media combated the extremism of the bush presidency. so unlike foreign policy, domestic political forces in the united states had the ability –albeit with varying degrees of successto contest the extreme policies of the american president. kolin’s book is an effective warning to readers that the media, congress and the courts, and social forces must work to prevent the executive from abusing its power and control over america’s foreign policy. without the public forcing american institutions to keep watch, the president can commit illegal or immoral acts in the name of security. this book is recommended for those interested in a comprehensive, and thorough, overview of covert actions taken by the cia and fbi before and during the bush presidency, particularly in reaction to the september 11th terrorist attacks. 252 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism book review canada and israel: building apartheid by yves engler. winnipeg: fernwood publishing, 2010. $15.95 can. isbn: 978-1-55266-355-4. pages: 1-168. reviewed by natalie spagnuolo1 canada’s policy towards israel constitutes a minefield of contentious issues which historians of canadian foreign relations seldom directly address. among the accounts that are most visible, few diverge from the nationalist narrative that represents canada as historically favouring peace-keeping over militarism. this positive portrait of canada, as suggested by paul heinbecker and bessma momani’s, compliments a somewhat more critical stance that imagines canada’s role as a less consequential, neutral player in middle east affairs.2 in canada and israel: building apartheid, engler problematizes the claims of current analysts, such the former canadian ambassador to israel michael bell,3 who would like to see greater canadian involvement in the middle east. engler takes issue with the perception of canada’s suitability as an “honest-broker” in the israel-palestine conflict. he argues that a consistently pro-israel attitude has characterized canada’s foreign policy towards the conflict from the nineteenth century onwards. perhaps no other study makes as strong a claim as engler does for historical consistency in terms of canadian complicity in the zionist expansion of jewish settlements. building on the foundation of leftwing revisionist readings of zionism as a form of colonialism, engler implicates canada in the controversial expansion of the state of israel and the current apartheid conditions by considering the domestic and international events that have supported these developments. following a tradition that traces canadian interest in the region back to the anti-semitic christian political 1 natalie spagnuolo completed an ma in history at carleton university. 2 heinbecker, p. and b. momani (eds.). canada and the middle east: in theory and practice. waterloo: wilfred laurier university. 3 bell, m., m. malloy, d. sultan and s. shaker. practitioner’ perspectives on canada-middle east relations. in heinbecker, p. and b. momani (eds.). canada and the middle east: in theory and practice (pp.7-24). waterloo: wilfred laurier university. canada and israel | 253 culture of the nineteenth century, the first chapter of this book attempts to develop a historical trend by assuming continuity between disparate time periods. engler represents the general tone of entire decades with single statements that demonstrate a “fortuitous political climate” for the federation of zionist societies of canada (p.13). considering the scope of the study, these leaps are likely made to allow engler to address the present-day consequences of canada’s support for israeli expansionism. nevertheless, his less-than-precise treatment of zionism conflates various versions of the movement and misleadingly overlooks participation by canadians in anti-expansionist zionist organizations, such as the union of progressive zionists (upz). engler’s larger point is that historically, canadian society has facilitated israel’s expansion by conjuring its own justifications for sustaining nationalist aggression, and not by simply borrowing the arguments of political zionists. through salient case studies, he highlights some of the advantages that canada has gained throughout various stages of its support for israeli expansionism, including such economic benefits as might result from the sale of weapons by canadian manufacturers to israeli buyers (p.10). a more thorough exposition of this thesis occurs in chapters 2, 3 and 4, which focus on the ways in which canadian policy has been influenced by broader international relations and a tendency to remain “preoccupied with the great powers,” namely britain and america (p.24). however, engler derives this trend from a reading of various media sources without comparing coverage of events, and this, along with his reliance on secondary sources that are often considered polemical, detracts from the credibility of this section. his humanitarian convictions and his motivation to mould his argument along these lines leads to a somewhat univocal interpretation of events. by not considering the subjectivity of his own accounts, engler consistently eschews the academic integrity necessary to persuade opponents of this perspective. these early chapters are balanced with a final section that is derived from a leftist, politically-conscious reading of present-day canada. more convincingly, chapters 5 and 6 document how canada’s supportive attitude for israel has been consistent with the activities of intelligence agencies, lobby groups, and major canadian corporations and charities. engler exposes aspects of canadian society that function to directly support israel’s expansion but which are, interestingly enough, unknown to most canadians, supporting the idea that “israel is highly dependent on north american financial, military, ideological and diplomatic support” 254 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism (p.145). key to engler’s claim is the connection he draws between the charitable status granted to israeli expansionist organizations in canada, such as the jewish national fund, and the support for canadian industries active in palestinian territory that falls beyond the green line. engler suggests the anti-semitic nature of explanations exaggerate the role of canada’s jewish communities. carefully distinguishing between anti-semitism and anti-zionism in chapter 9, he highlights the extensive efforts of anti-zionist jewish organizations and warns against the use of anti-semitism to discourage anti-zionist values (p.146). canadian complicity in israel is, according to engler, the outcome of a discourse that has developed while most canadians have been “shut-out of the discussion” (p.147). this political commentary is supplemented with engler’s own experience as a political activist. his skill in researching economic connections to foreign policy (see his black book of canadian foreign policy) lends this book greater weight as a counter-narrative, despite his failure to follow academic conventions. throughout canada and israel, engler insists that the relevancy of the current conflict in palestine and the suffering of palestinians must be defended based on canada’s role in that conflict and “canadian complicity with that suffering” (p.142). according to engler, failure to adequately defend the prioritization of this issue to canadians will not only sideline the problem but will risk insinuating anti-semitism (p.142). ingraining his argument in the thick fabric of controversy, engler’s book is a welcome contribution to the sparsely populated field of critical studies of canadian-israeli relations. 270 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism book review mexico’s revolution then and now by d. cockcroft. new york: monthly review press, 2010. $14.95 us, paper. isbn-13: 978-1-58367-224-2. pages: 1-160. reviewed by naomi alisa calnitsky1 in mexico’s revolution then and now, james cockcroft interrogates the parallels between the mexican revolution of 1910-17 and current political conflicts in mexico. he explores what persuasive ideas shaped and influenced revolutionary acts and the ways in which anarchist ideas and modes of thought were woven into revolutionary action. the author also attempts to provide a critical reassessment of continuities between early strands of revolutionary thought and those that persist, however embattled, in mexico today. in his first published book in 1968, intellectual precursors of the mexican revolution, 1900-1913, cockcroft explored the ideas which shaped revolution in mexico. mexico’s revolution then and now is a welcome addition to existing literature on mexican revolutionary ideology, relevant for its assessment of the ways in which revolutionary ideas have shaped contemporary resistance movements. cockcroft highlights magonistas’ influence upon the revolution, including their ideals of anarcho-communism and socialism. scholars such as john mason hart have explored the critical role played by ricardo flores magon as an organizer of a “pro-democracy movement” in mexico from the 1890’s through to 1910. hart’s emphasis upon the instrumental ideological work carried out by the partido liberal mexicano (p.l.m.) mirrors cockcroft’s assessments of the movement. cockcroft draws our attention to the “lessons and legacies” of the revolutionary period, illuminating present-day asymmetries and inequalities. in mexico, for example, the minimum wage remains the “weakest” across latin america. revolutionary struggles in contemporary mexico enrich the narrative, which intertwines past and present. cockcroft affords considerable attention the oaxacan-born revolutionary, ricardo flores magón, 1 naomi alisa calnitsky is a ph.d. candidate in the department of history at carleton university, ottawa. she received an ma in history from otago university in new zealand, where she specialized in pacific island seasonal migration to new zealand. her doctoral thesis research seeks to enhance the voices of mexican migrant workers in canadian labour history narratives. she currently lives in montreal, quebec. book review: mexico’s revolution then and now | 271 and the anti-imperialist mexican liberal party. in 1906 the p.l.m. disseminated an agenda for radical agrarian reform for communities dispossessed of lands and set out clauses to protect indigenous peoples. significantly, cockcroft weaves in the revolutionary contributions and sufferings experienced by magonista women (e.g. margarita ortega), redressing the paucity of historical attention devoted to mexican women involved with the magonista movement. cockcroft links revolutionary-era struggles to present-day labour conflict. the author emphasizes the magonistas’ goals of human emancipation and social justice and the role of the p.l.m. in co-ordinating a series of strikes prior to the revolution and the repression faced by those who joined its ranks. cockcroft flags persisting labour violations as key sites of contemporary struggle. of note are conflicts between working people’s rights and american, as well as transnational, companies based in mexico from anaconda copper at cananea to continental tire in el salto. the current political scene in mexico is assessed as wholly neoliberal and corrupt, poverty is viewed as generated (rather than worsened) by neoliberal policy, and mass emigrations and union-busting considered normalized features of mexican life. the militarization of the mexican border control, which increased under the obama administration, and consolidation of contemporary imperialism, particularly in oil, feature in cockcroft’s intrepid work. cultural items are treated in connection with the economy, including for instance, the dual monopoly over mexican television which operates under the “iron control” of two mexican billionaires. mexico’s uneven economic development is counterbalanced with the magonista era in which it was believed that the means of production were in need of a re-ordering. the revolution and its aftermath are deconstructed to their very core through a wholly economic analysis rooted in a social history approach. the ascent of the mexican bourgeoisie in the twentieth century is charted and the “institutional” revolution is exposed as counter-revolutionary, antagonistic to the interests of most mexicans. labour concerns remain at the heart of mexico’s revolution, then and now, which unearths contemporary popular uprisings against neoliberalism in the face of state-led, patriotic pacification campaigns that emphasized the “glorious revolution” and championed mexican identity through the celebration of public art. while the study does not go to great lengths to enrich our understanding of the revolutionary period, it does a fair job at emphasizing the ideological contributions made by magon and his followers. 272 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism cockcroft assesses the cárdenas administration as fraught with holes: during this time millions of hectares of land were transferred to peasants, yet best quality lands remained in the hands of twelve mostly foreign-owned corporations, enabling neolatifundismo to dominate mexican agriculture in ensuing decades. the abandonment of revolutionary ideals and political corruption are key themes. his immiseration thesis identifies n.a.f.t.a. as responsible for mexico’s dramatic loss of self-sufficiency in agriculture. neoliberal trading schemes are treated as naked imperialism. in spite of mexico retaining state-owned resources such as oil, pemex profits have not trickled down to the population and this state-owned company continues to fuel american consumption. as in mexico`s hope (1998), cockcroft is tuned into mexico’s most recent social conflicts. cockcroft believes that, while population growth does not create immiseration, in reality it has more to do with how capitalism operates. cockcroft credits injustices perpetuated upon the people to right-wing decision-making, and the book is concerned more with explaining current social ills facing the nation than with actually revisiting the revolutionary period. it emphasizes, for example, the high proportion of indigenous people and languages still present in mexico and the spread of neo-zapatismo from chiapas to other indigenous communities. resistance strategies are presented, for example the modern-day “sit-in” (plantón) of adelitos and adelitas advocating fair politics (actions taken by a female-led labour solidarity movement for maquiladora workers). modern attempts to reinstate political democracy are emphasized, including the neo-zapatistas who champion tierra y libertad (a magonista slogan) and continue to maintain autonomous “good government” municipalities. women`s issues are not ignored in this work. the author’s critiques of transnational capitalism’s inherently exploitative character refresh our understanding of current crises facing mexico, offering a relevant and necessary contribution and critical manifesto for change. perhaps lacking for not sufficiently engaging with the views of mexicans on their own revolutionary past and current predicament, cockcroft’s diligent and methodical work remains radical in nature and should be considered required reading for all those interested in gaining a better understanding of mexico today. 978-1-926958-01-9 175 book review canada’s 1960s: the ironies of identity in a rebellious era by bryan d. palmer. toronto: university of toronto press, 2008. $35.00 us, paper. isbn 978-08020-9954-9. pages: 1-605. reviewed by edward hilchey1 curious about ‘what it is to be canadian’? if so, you are not alone. grounding this question of identity in history, bryan palmer theorises that the turbulence of the 1960s played a significant role in the destabilization of established notions of canadian identity. re-evaluating the personalities and movements of the 1960s, palmer argues that the 60s push towards an equitable society acted as a catalyst for questioning canada’s historic british identity. however, these movements did not provide any long lasting certainty over what canada’s national identity should entail. palmer’s style of writing quietly and gently guides us into his perception of canada’s experience of the 1960s. layering his work topically, palmer demonstrates himself to be as much of a cultural as he is a labour historian. well-supported with 143 pages of notes, he adds a humanistic depth to this work through a series of anecdotes from newspapers, poems, activist manifestos and other lesser known works. through the effective use of these resources with broader themes and debates, palmer critically engages the developments of the 1960s. palmer connects a range of events which emerged in the 1960s through creative and concise language, blending the transformation of this social and political climate. the choice to examine canada during the 1960s for palmer lies precisely in its overt activism. the 60s were marred with patterns of hostility demarcating regional, political, cultural, and linguistic disparities. through a marxist definition of irony (drawn from terry eagleton), palmer comments that “capitalism is that of a system 1 edward hilchey is an m.a. candidate at carleton university. he can be reached at ehilchey@connect.carleton.ca canada’s 1960s: the ironies of identity in a rebellious era 176 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research frozen in its fixed modes of representation, yet mobilizing a desire to overturn all representation; which gives birth to a great carnival of difference... which constantly conjures material inequality out of abstract equality; which is in need of an authority it continually flouts” (p. 9). the post-world war image of canada was that of a white european colony emerging to become a state. the irony was that canada was on the verge of confronting its own self image. in a renewed analysis, palmer counters the notion that canada’s 1960s was sui generis, that is, a spent generation whose objectives were not obtained (p. 5), and argues that this particular period was characterized with widespread changes in canada. palmer sets the stage by contextualizing events within the broader history affecting canada in the post-war era. part 1 begins with the fluctuation of the canadian dollar and its subsequent inflation in the early 60s. reflecting on the unstable dollar as an indicator of political and economic ineffectiveness, political blunderings became the backdrop to express (and subsequently elect) needed change in canada. these episodes quashed canada’s image as one of british dominion, settled by a robust and progressive populace. as well, it severed many historical economic ties with britain by shifting economic focus to the rise of the imperialist united states. in part 2, palmer tracks the international attention being afforded to canada through a variety of publicized events and scandals. emphasizing the role of electronic media in broadcasting and journalism, canadians became fascinated with sex scandals and political wrangling. from the munsinger affair wherein a displaced women from world war ii came to media attention due to her personal relationships with prominent conservative figures, to the acceptance of the ali-chuvolo fight where an underdog boxer survived fifteen rounds with the ‘louisville lip”. the way canadians perceived sexuality and white-ness was being transformed, paving the way for trudeau mania. canadians found themselves elated by the international recognition these events received, though these events flew in the face of victorian values and conventions. in parts 3 & 4, he mentions that the politicization of youth and striking workers lead to the opening of canada’s political organizations for debate. with airwaves and television screens saturated with nationalistic fervour, the unruly, reactive, and openly rebellious youth had moved from the margins of social transformation (paralleling labour) into “the very core of a decade’s understanding of social-political meaning” (p. 209). youth were rejecting integration into family and nation, as represented in the victoria day disturbances. street youth hostility shifted towards the development of subsequent banners of new left radicalism, revolutionary strife in quebec and indian red power. alternative identities awoke and broadcasted their displeasure with british canada. they drew their ideals, strength and support from the pantheon of marginal groups which were reinventing and redefining themselves. 177 the conclusion ends with the vanguard of british canada gathering with the world in montreal’s expo 67, celebrating canada’s arrival into the modern era. with the replacement of the red ensign for the maple leaf and an army of rcmp keeping the protestors and the flq at bay, canadian identity would remain precarious. yet, expo 67 and the maple leaf flag would be as unsuccessful at charting a unified path for canada as the victoria day celebrations and bank of canada issued currency before it. palmer’s remarks in the introduction are epitomized in this final section in which canadians “finally extricated themselves from a national identity... [that] so many voices had come to proclaim outmoded” (24). palmers understanding and application of historical materialism places increased emphasis on content and examples as compared to theoretical debate (five pages in the introduction are devoted to eagleson & his theoretical perspective). choosing to elaborate the historical antagonism bred from exploitation and struggle within canada, as seen in the dearth of detail, he presents an interpretive history of canada during the 60s, refocusing the period as a topic worthy of analytical spotlight. palmer uses this work to ‘suggest’ (p. 21) the reasons why the past happened as it did, and how the outcome of these events maintained a destabilized canadian identity. his analytical approach focuses on how the conflicting ideas were critically important to history. palmer concludes that the dominate relations of class conflict may be seen in the struggle over canadian identity, an identity which required significant consideration of how gender, race, empire and imperialism, social movements and identity interplay. the significance of this book lies within its reminder to scholars that the struggles of the 1960s have not completely died, and that this period has made a lasting contribution to canadian society. the intent is for others to understand the significant impact that 1960s & 70s politics and activism had in the uprooting of victorian canada. this book was written for both those who were present during the 60s and those who are interested in the implications of views from this period in canada. palmer asserts that what he offers through his work is “not so much a synthesis of the 60s, as suggestion on what destabilized the canadian identity, rooted in some specifics” (21). the point becomes clear that everything has a history; that before trudeau, we needed munsinger; that before red power or the flq, we needed ‘white niggers of america’ and hooliganism; that the transition of the canadian identity could only occur while being rooted in these events. reinforcing the point that canadians have accepted an undetermined identity rather than one passed down from establishment, this book reopens the tumultuous period which was the 1960s for further analysis. canada’s 1960s: the ironies of identity in a rebellious era 178 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research whole book pdf beyond the fur trade: the rise and fall of the eskimo 1 co-operative marybelle myer& this paper is a case study of post world war two state intervention in the canadian arctic and the birth of the eskimo co-operative movement . the argument is that the native co-operative is in the process of becoming a marginalized institution in the face of the development of a corporate structure consequent upon settlement of land claims. specific reference is made to arctic quebec where aboriginal title has been settled although, it is argued, a similar process is occurring across the arctic. cet article analyse i' intervention etatique d' apres-guerre dans i ' arctique canadien et la naissance du mouvement cooperatif inuit. ii y est soutenu que la cooperatif indigene devient une institution marginale face au developpement d'une structure corporative suite au riglement des litiges sur les terres. bien que ce processus se produise dans tout i'arctique, c'est surtout sur i 'arctique quebecois , oil des accords sur les possessions aborigines ont ete conclus , que porte cet expose. alternate routes vol. 5 1982 28 successive waves of outsiders have wrought great changes in the canadian inuit economy. few analyses exist, however, of events after the fur trade which has been of almost no significance since the middle of this century. the focus of this paper will be on the period of state intervention after the second world war, a period marked by the rise of state-initiated native co-operatives and the recent development of a corporate structure. although i refer specifically to arctic quebec, where aboriginal title has been settled, most inuit have passed through the same historical periods to find themselves in a common predicament. in less than one hundred years, the subsistence economy, in which production was mainly (but not exclusively) for use, has been transformed to one involving a mix of subsistence hunting and gathering, simple commodity production, some permanent, but mostly casual, labour and relief and transfer payments. although there were specific regional differences, the native economy may be organised into five overlapping socio-economic periods: (1) the subsistence economy which was based on hunting and gathering and lasted until the latter part of the nineteenth century (2) the fur trade and mission era in which trapping for exchange was added to subsistence hunting and gathering and which declined in importance in mid-twentieth century (3) the development of a state structure after world war ii with trapping and subsistence activities being supplemented by wage labour and government transfer payments and relief (4) the development of native enterprise in the form, mainly, of co-operatives which expanded commodity production and opportunities for wage labour and also succeeded in forging links of ethnic solidarity among 29 inuit and (5) the development of a corporate structure which resulted from the birth of eskimo politics in the ?0's and which has fostered the rise of an indigeneous elite. the development of a state structure prior to the second world war, state interest in the north focussed on the land (mapping and some communications facilities) while the people and administrative functions were handled by what came to be referred to as a "triumvirate," consisting of missionary, trader and policeman. looking after the education and health of the natives, the missionaries functioned as agents of the state. in addition to their own pursuits, the traders "took care" of the economic well-being of the people, buying furs and extending credit (a form of welfare) when hunting was poor. the police, present in the interests of sovereignty, performed administrative functions for the state (rea, 1968:52). post world war ii state involvement was drastically cahnged and the three often-cited reasons for this are: (1) a perceived need to expand sovereignty over canada's northern territories (2) a growing awareness of the resource potential of the area and (3) an appreciation of the plight of the natives many of whom were, literally, starving to death (rea, 1968:55). the department of indian affairs and natural resources was set up in 1953 and, as the title implies, its role may be broken down into the functions of legitimation and accumulation. "indian affairs," which included those of inuit, were dealt with by the extension to the north of health alternate routes vol. 5 1982 30 and welfare programmes in place in southern canada (legitimation) and the continued presence of the rcmp who ensured, for instance, that children attended school through the judicious withholding of social assistance (coercion). the "natural resources" mandate of the department was fulfilled through state investment in social capital overhead facilities (transportation, electricity), a move which provided access to resources and was, therefore, directly beneficial to private enterprise. the state also undertook to stimulate local economies through the exploitation of renewable resources and the creation of wage labour for natives. one explicit, if inconsistently adhered to, ambition was to encourage assimilation of the native population into the western wage economy and lifestyle. gordon robertson had this to say about the state's plans for the natives in a 1960 speech to the institute of public administration of canada: the plan for educating the native both academically and vocationally, is a good one but should not be rushed. in time, this will permit the assimilation of the native into our society and also assist industry and government by establishing a pool of trained personnel who are familiar with the north (371). in spite of the fact that the native people were few in numbers, dispersed across 40 per cent of the canadian land mass, unskilled and virtually all unable to speak either of canada's official languages, they were to be put on hold as a reserve army to be called up when all other alternatives had been put to work. the provision of new services to the north meant the building of schools, nursing stations, administrative offices 31 and housing for imported personnel. these were usually constructed at the site of the trading posts in spite of the fact that their locations had been chosen to satisfy the demands of the fur trade (access to ports, for instance) and were not necessarily suitable to support large colonies of people. there are now 22,300 inuit living in approximately 50 towns across the arctic, most of them comprised of no more than a few hundred people. they are too large for their population to be supported from the land and too small and scattered to permit the development of viable local economies or extensive internal exchange. movement of inuit from the camps into the new administrative centres, mainly voluntary but in some cases coerced, began in the mid 50 's and, in some areas, was not completed until the mid 60's. the acculturation process was, of course, greatly accelerated in towns. earlier contact, with trader or missionary, had been on a one-to-one basis and although biased, at least occurred at a pace more or less governed by inuit who decided when they would go into the post to trade and who were, in many cases, unable to speak directly to the whites. change which had been gradual and relatively non-disruptive under the fur trade was now greatly accelerated and resulted, predictably, in considerable social disorganization. the first effect to be noted was the deterioration of formerly self-reliant people into dependent people. the lifestyle demanded by town living depended heavily upon outside institutions. although they were the numerical majority, inuit townsmen were an effective minority. they had once patterned alternate routes vol. 5 1982 32 their own lives according to a biologically determined rhythm -a time for catching caribou and a time for making clothes -but town life was decisively patterned by outsiders who had direct access to outside support systems. planes and ships began coming into isolated northern villages on a more or less regular, though infrequent, schedule but nothing they contained (mail, foodstuffs, equipment) was addressed to inuit. their cargo was the "property" of the white residents who administered it, at their discretion, to the "community." actually, there was very little feeling of community among the inuit who were family oriented and lacked a strong ethnic identity. simard (1972:18 et al., esp. vallee, 1967) observes that inuit did not adjust easily to life in the new urban centres but tended to resist integration through adherence to their old camp identities. apart from the social disorganization attendant upon town living, the development of the people as consumers and their deterioration as producers was almost immediately evident. firearms had, by now, virtually replaced harpoons and spears and the most significant material changes which occurred were the move from skin tents and snowhouses into wooden houses and the shift in dependence from country food to preserved food. the trading posts expanded their stocks of imported goods in order to provide for new needs which were generated from necessity (as an alternative food and clothing source) and from emulation of the transient white population. increasing reliance upon imported consumer goods led, inevitably, to the loss of formerly necessary hunting and handicraft skills which had been 33 passed, in apprentice fashion, through generations of their ancestors. for the first time, inuit became large-scale consumers and occasional producers, providing for themselves through a combination of hunting and trapping (for use and exchange) , some handicraft production, wage labour and social assistance. the latter was the solution most often resorted to as game in the immediate area was used up and the town population continued to swell through migration from camps and improved health care. native enterprise: the co-operative movement potentially profitable, non-renewable resource exploitation was left in the domain of private enterprise while attempts were made to establish native enterprise in the form of co-ops based on commercial fishing, handicraft programmes and, in some cases, retail stores. a great deal was expected of these co-operative ventures. as arbess (1966:47) says, "the official policy was that the eskimo people should, with all deliberate haste, have control over these organizations in all of their aspects, and should regain their self-sufficiency." statements to this effect, and there were many, should not, however, be taken too literally. "self sufficiency" was used rather ambiguously to mean that natives should exploit renewable resources more vigorously than formerly in order to generate a profit which would eliminate the need of government funding. they were, it might be added, expected to do this with little hope of generating internal exchange and in the face of a massive deficit of social capital overhead facilities. alternate routes vol. 5 1982 34 canada's position vis a vis northern development has always been marked by considerable ambiguity and it may be speculated that the co-operative form of business was considered the ideal development tool because it enabled the natives, hence, the state, to keep one foot in both worlds. americans had forthrightly declared that the traditional culture must be suppressed in the interests of assimilating alaskan natives. the danes took the opposite, but equally unambiguous, stance that greenlanders , being inferior, could never be assimilated and should, therefore, be helped to become better eskimos. canadians, however, have waffled somewhere in between, believing on the one hand that the culture was doomed and the people must be assimilated and, on the other, that they should be helped to live off the land in ways which would not cause undue violence to the traditional culture and the noble savage concept. co-operatives, capitalizing on traditional activities and values, were a felicitous form, accommodating canadian ambiguity by both "modernizing" inuit and enabling them to retain reassuring roots in the past. as louis tapardjuk, president of canadian arctic co-operatives federation limited, sums up, "we're all aware that the co-op is the best vehicle for joining the two activities of culture and money" ( proceedings , 1980:14). organization and economic impact of co-operatives the first eskimo co-operative, based on commercial fishing, was set up in 1959 on the initiative of the federal government. there are now 38active eskimo co-ops across the arctic, affiliated 4 through two federations. ten arctic quebec co-operatives 35 (including one mixed indian and eskimo) are members of the montreal based la federation des cooperatives du nouveau-quebec , while the northwest territories' co-operatives are members of canadian arctic co-operatives federation limited, based in yellowknife. the quebec movement has no links to the powerful desjardins co-operative organization but the northwest territories' movement has established some links with the western canada co-operative movement. combined membership figures (for the northwest territories and quebec) are not readily available but it may be safely assumed that virtually all of the inuit population is involved in one way or another with their local co-operative. membership lists are, in any case, often not current and some people use the co-operative and consider themselves members without actually signing up. more revealing than compilations of book memberships is the support given co-operatives in terms of local purchasing. the pattern for 1976 in northern quebec may be seen in illustration one. since the hudson's bay company (hbc) and the co-operative compete for local business in almost every northern village, a meaningful way of evaluating support for the co-op would be through a comparison of the money spent at each place. the fifty-fifty split shown in the diagram below is so neat that it is immediately suspect. the hudson's bay company has consistently refused to make its numbers available although beaulieu claims to have confidential information supporting this division which, coincidentally or not, has been the working hypothesis of arctic quebec co-op management for the past several years. alternate routes vol. 5 1982 36 % ho u .— 1 v ** ,£. in u ^3 «-> tt m u 11 i lao 1 8 v* «-> o v w 3 ^ d. «o o 3 %* rtt3 c 37 the competition between the hudson's bay company and the co-operatives is complicated. although co-ops are native-owned and have taken both official and unofficial steps to hinder the hudson's bay company from operating in competition with them, most inuit continue to support the "company," their loyalty stemming from their appreciation of its having been around when times were rough to avert famine and death. some inuit are also coming to realize the benefits of having more than one source of consumer goods and, especially, more than one outlet for their carving production. only committed native co-operators now talk about removing the hbc from the north. others complain that co-op prices are higher than the company's, and their merchandise inferior. some threaten to sell all of their carvings to the hbc if they do not get the price they want from the co-op. there is, of course, more information to be gleaned from the diagram above, although space permits only a few further comments. the tertiary sector is, as we might expect, dominated by the state which provides 75 per cent of revenue, in the form of salaries (34 per cent) and transfer payments (41 per cent). the co-operative and the hudson's bay company each account for so per cent of non-state revenue. actual payouts by the co-ops increased from $1.3 million in 1976 to $3.1 million in 1979 and although it is not known, definitely, how this increase compares with increases in payouts from state and private enterprise, it may be that the relative percentages have shifted considerably since the federal government has withdrawn many of its northern operations (in quebec) and a new native-owned alternate routes vol. 5 1982 38 employer, makivik corporation, has come on the scene. in any case, the amount spent on salaries by the co-operatives cannot be correlated, in terms of jobs provided, with that spent by other organizations, especially the state, since the co-ops have historically paid lower salaries than the competition. to be meaningful, information on wage and salary payouts needs to be supplemented with the numbers of jobs provided by the various agencies, with account being taken of the fact that a large percentage of co-op payouts would be for cottage industry g production of handicrafts. at the time of vallee's work, the state was the largest employer in terms of jobs but treude (1972:23) claimed that, in 1971, co-ops provided 280 permanent jobs, "making them the largest employer in the canadian arctic." i would estimate that there are now 500 full time jobs provided in the whole arctic co-op system. unfortunately, the information needed to make a comparison with other organizations is not available, although a 1979 publication from the two arctic federations maintains that co-ops continue to be "the largest employer of native labour in the arctic" ( facts s figures , 1980). state assistance to eskimo co-operatives in spite of co-op disclaimers, it is commonly believed that there is an over-reliance by co-operatives on state assistance. vallee (1967:27,44) for instance, downplayed the povungnituk co-op's claims to have pulled itself up by its own "bootstraps" (paraphrased) , suggesting that this was mere propaganda designed to encourage people to support the co-operative. although it had a definite promotional value, it was also the 39 serious intention and, for a while, the achievement, of arctic quebec co-operatives to "do it on their own." in fact, it was state policy that they should since, as i have mentioned, state-initiated projects were expected to become self supporting as quickly as possible. in the beginning, state-owned buildings and equipment were provided. state assistance also took the form of technical and financial field personnel to train native co-op staffs. since the income of inuit (who were mainly supported by welfare at the time) meant that it was impossible for them to raise sufficient working capital through the sale of shares or through 9 application to private financial institutions, an eskimo loan fund (elf) was set up by the state in 1953 "to make low cost loans to individual inuks or to groups for starting small businesses and exploiting local resources" (undated hand-out) . treude (1972:5) reports that the maximum loan available from this fund in 1972 was $50,000, payable over ten years at 5 per cent. in 1975, elf ceased to offer subsidised interest and went to the full market rate and there is now no ceiling on the amount of individual loans. although the history of state financial intervention is interesting and illustrative, i will merely touch on a fewhighlights here. combined federal and provincial support to arctic quebec co-operatives from 1963 to 1978 inclusive was $7,242,000, of which the federal government provided 42 per cent and the provincial government 58 per cent. most of quebec's input (73 per cent) was, however, in the form of loans, while the federal government input was mainly (69 per alternate routes vol. 5 1982 40 cent) in the form of grants. there was, however, no federal assistance provided in '64 and '65, a mere $10,000 in '66 and nothing in '67 and '68. this reflected a basic disagreement between co-op personnel and government project officers as to how co-op affairs should be run. the federal government was persuaded to resume assistance in 1969 and, in 1976, federal inputs took a giant leap, from a $150,000 loan the year before (to stave off bankruptcy), to $646,500. this was the beginning of a five year plan to rationalize state financing of arctic co-operatives. now in its final year, the plan resulted from a study done by the federal government's bureau of management consultants (bmc) who concluded that state intervention was necessary; for, as a result of growth and a continuing inability to raise private funds, the co-ops were desperately in need of working capital. the bmc group recommended a self -development programme to be funded by a mix of contributions and loans, with the idea, of course, that, at the end of the five year period, the co-operatives would indeed be self sufficient. in the early 70's, the affiliated arctic quebec co-ops had boasted of diminishing government support and increasing self-suf f iciencv. figures compiled by the author at the time demonstrated that, in four years, the ratio of state to co-op support had been reversed. in 1967, the state provided 61 per cent of the co-ops' funding requirements and, in 1970, only 34 per cent. if these figures were updated, it would be seen that, because of the bmc programme, the trend has again reversed, although not approaching anywhere near its 1967 disproport ion . 41 much more work needs to be done to assess the significance of state assistance to native co-ops, especially on a comparative basis since it must be recognized that there is still a relative lack of social capital facilities in the north where "the normal superstructure that undergirds business ventures in the south is almost entirely absent" (phalen, 1974:1). services are more expensive in the north than in the south and stores must be resupplied by expensive air freight or once yearly marine transportation. this means financing huge inventories of bulky staples (flour, sugar, tinned goods) and equipment (canoes, motors, ski-doos) which are ordered for a year ahead and have to be paid for in advance of sales. any comparison should also take into account the fact that the state has, over a ten year period (1970 to 1980), provided $27.1 million to various organizations involved in northern land claims research, but only $9 million over a twenty year period (1960-1980) to all the arctic co-operatives. this amount should also be evaluated in light of the federal government's budget for 1980-81 northern spending of $856 million. co-operative activities co-operative activities fall into two categories: (1) those involving the provision of goods and services locally and (2) those involving production for export. in the first group are included retail stores, oil and gas sales and delivery, restaurant and hotel operations, recreation facilities (movies and poolrooms), the sale of country food, and construction programmes. the second group comprises the production of alternate routes vol. 5 1982 42 furs for export, commercial fishing, the collection (and formerly cleaning) of eiderdown, tourist programmes and arts and crafts production. expansion in the first area is limited because of the small and scattered market which prohibits internal exchange and the lack of linkage between production and consumption. commercial production is for export, except in the case of country food which accounts for only a small percentage of total local sales. as far as expansion in the second area goes, although ongoing efforts are expended to develop exportable products, most have failed because of the high cost of production anywhere in the north. many things have been suggested and tried (and are being suggested again) : food processing, component assembly, saw mills, logging operations, tanneries and, even, the manufacture of ivory surgical pins for orthopedic use! ruffing (n.d:36) makes the point (with reference to the navajo nation) that north american natives cannot compete with "asian sweatshops" and "are one of the latest victims of the new international division of labour." the manager of the quebec federation puts it more simply: "anything you can do in the north, you can do cheaper somewhere else" (murdoch , april, 1981). in spite of the co-operatives' efforts to diversify, most revenue continues to be derived from consumer, rather than producer, activities. beaulieu (1980:42) estimated that, in 1977-78, 76 per cent of the total business done by northern quebec co-ops resulted from consumer activities, while only 24 per cent came from production. the most successful area 43 of production is handicraft which has taken over from fur as the significant trading commodity. the problem is not, either, simply one of capital. the news has not been good even when relatively large amounts of state money have been available, as it has been for projects sponsored by the government of the northwest territories. garment manufacture at inuvik has been subsidized for years and although the producing facility is capable of expansion, the market appears not to be. the other factor is, quoting berger (1977:11:39) "the wishes of the native people themselves." the people complain of being relegated to marginal status and say that they are not content to be shunted into yet more handicraft projects. they recognize that arts and crafts programmes will never be sufficient to bridge the gap between development and underdevelopment. as the white manager of the west baffin eskimo co-operative (cape dorset) said at a meeting held to discuss eskimo art: due to the government's failure to develop alternative industry in the north, there is an inordinate pressure on talent in the north to make up for the lack of development. craft projects seem to be considered the magic solution to everything (ryan, in minutes , 1978:48). it is not surprising that arctic co-operatives are popularly identified with the arts and crafts programmes since this is virtually the only significant area of production and surpluses from carving and printmaking provide support for non-productive 1 2 and non-profitable projects. the arts and crafts programmes, carving especially, have been expected to carry the whole burden of northern development for inuit. art as commodity the carving programme is the major single source of alternate routes vol. 5 1982 44 personal income for inuit. in arctic quebec, for instance, out of the $3.1 million paid out by co-ops in 1979, $1,419,000 or 45.7 per cent of this was used to purchase carvings from the local population. the purchase of other crafts would bring this figure closer to $1.5 million, a figure which would have been higher in the northwest territories, an estimated $2.5 or $3 million. until recently, the global significance of income from art programmes could have been determined by meshing purchase figures for the hbc and the co-ops. northern purchasing by private entrepreneurs has, however, escalated considerably in the past few years, making such a computation more elusive. although carvings had been a trading commodity for ten years before the first co-op was incorporated in 1959, it was the co-operatives which organized their large-scale production and distribution as well as assuming some of the development functions formerly exercised by the federal government. before the co-ops were organized, the hudson's bay company was the main purchaser and, before that, purchasing was organized by the canadian guild of crafts (montreal), the institution responsible for introducing the first inuit art to the canadian public. the initial hope of both whites and inuit was that carving would provide an alternative to dependence upon trapping. it succeeded in this to a remarkable degree. as johnny pov, an inuk from povungnituk, said: "carvings rescued all the people from the wretched situation they were in. if they had to rely only on the trading of fox skins, they would undoubtedly still be poor today"! in myers, 1977a:n.p). for the first time, inuit were 45 freed from eternal dependence upon luck and could expect, more or less by their own efforts, to be able to secure a reasonably steady supply of food. the significant thing was that they could do this without major social disruption. they could carve and still structure their own time. they could work at home or on the land. they could obtain their own raw materials, utilizing traditional relations of production. they did not need to go to school to learn a new skill or to speak another language in order to make their living. they could teach their children. from the beginning, there has been a direct relation of carving to consumption. inuit were not attempting to get rich but to satisfy immediate needs. peter murdoch, manager of the hudson's bay company in povungnituk in 1955, observed that an inuk, needing tea in the morning, would make a carving, sell it to the company and buy some tea. he might repeat this performance in the afternoon when he discovered he needed some lard or flour (myers, 1977b:13). brody (1975:173) also remarked that when a carver needed $30, he made a $30 carving. this still tends to be the pattern, with some carvers making very large sculptures for which they might receive $1,000 to $6,000, in order to obtain some expensive equipment such as a ski-doo or boat. peak purchase times for carving coincide with peak buying times -just before christmas and just before sealift in late summer. although there is great inequity in the volume of goods exported and the volume of goods imported, because of the high prices obtained for even trivial carvings, the transfer of alternate routes vol. 5 1982 46 value perpetrated through their exchange may not be as glaring as that occasioned by the fur trade. ruffing (n.d:29) talks about the transfer of value that takes place fthrough unequal exchange) when navajo hand-made products are exchanged for machine-made products. it is interesting to note that some native carvers, quite unversed in economic theory, have wondered why "toys sold in the co-op store, that are made in a few minutes on a machine and break in a few days cost as much as (they) get for a carving that took three hours to make by hand and will last forever." although eskimo carvers can, on an average, make $20 to $30 for a few hours' work and, unlike their southern counterparts, do not bear any of the expense or risk of selling their own productions, they must provide their own tools and gather their own materials. inuit consider this to be the most onerous part of the work of carving since it means, for instance, buying gas at more than $3 per gallon and travelling many miles by land or water, to hack soapstone out of the frozen ground. this becomes a family task although the extra labour is not taken into account when the carving is finally bought. since the income from carving does not provide for all of a carver's expenses, he must cover a part of his cost of reproduction through the utilization of his own and his family's labour to provide country food to take up the slack between what he earns and what he needs. due to the institution of a a sophisticated marketing strategy, eskimo art has been a significant commercial success, commanding prices far above that generally obtained for handicrafts. although the rate of growth has slowed down since 47 the boom in the early 70's, sales are holding. there is, however, a fear on the part of those involved that the market will disappear or continue to dwindle when what is urgently needed is expansion to take care of an inventory problem which has been nagging for several years but took on acute proportions in 1979. in general, there have been problems with over-production, quality and pricing, the predictable results of a non-selective buying policy. problems within the co-operative movement although the movement in quebec succeeded beyond anyone's expectations and was presented in the 1975 bmc report as a model of what should have been done all across the arctic, it has been bedevilled by several internal problems and conflicts: north-south trading lines, the emphasis on consumer rather than producer activities, the lack of infrastructure and working capital, the assymetrical relations of whites and natives and, perhaps most critical, the lack of member support. the latter is a universal problem of co-ops and is particularly telling in times of crisis. a. a. macdonald, from the coady international institute, attended the third conference of arctic co-operatives in 1980 and in his speech to delegates identified the "unrealistic expectations of members and disloyalty in times of crisis" as one of the factors preventing the farmers' and fishermen's co-ops in nova scotia from fully succeeding in their aspirations ( proceedings , 1980:10) unlike the situation in which discontented producers organize to further common interests, inuit co-ops were formed alternate routes vol. 5 1982 48 on behalf of the people. they were deliberately introduced by federal government agents as a mechanism of development. in many cases, due to the difficulty of explaining business concepts to non-english speaking inuit whose vocabulary, in any case, did not lend itself to economic explanations, co-ops were implemented before the people really understood their operation and implications. it took only a few appeals to their desire to regain self sufficiency (what vallee, 1967:42 calls"ideological calls to action") and the promise of lower prices for consumer goods and cash returns at the end of the year to convince people to join. in any case, in quebec, only twelve people were needed to start a co-operative and, in the northwest territories, only five (treude, 1972:6). the attitude of government project officers charged with setting up native co-operatives was thafthey would learn by doing" and the consequence of this was, of course, a lack of support when things were not going well, although a nucleus of committed inuit supporters did develop and joined white promoters in spreading the message. although they had a definite ideological appeal, the co-ops' enticement of members on the basis of promises they have been mostly unable to keep, has been a source of much discontent. as raymond ningeacheak (from coral harbour) said at the third co-operative conference ( proceedings , 1980:8): in the beginning of the co-op movement, the people were told quite clearly that there would be dividends from the operation of the co-operatives to benefit their members. this was one of the major points that was being circulated in the beginning of the co-op movement. unfortunately, it was given too much prominence and many people expected too much from 49 this point and not enough from the act of co-operation and common effort that would result from the co-operatives (as translated at the meeting) the hudson"s bay company, with greater purchasing power, has historically undercut co-op selling prices and cash dividends have not generally been forthcoming from the co-ops due to the inability of most to generate surpluses and their need to 14 retain them when they do. lack of membership support may reflect a deeper, structural problem, the effects of which, i would suggest, are now being felt in earnest. i am referring to the inherent contradiction in an institution purporting to uphold tradition (non-capitalist practices) while promoting change (in the direction of industrialization). grounded in tradition, co-ops were, and still try to be, committed to making decisions in "the eskimo way" but, at the same time, they have been obliged to link inuit into an external market which dictates its own terms. inuit consider, for example, that anyone, regardless of talent, has the right to earn his living from carving if he so chooses. the co-operatives support them in this attitude by buying anything from everyone. the market , however, places a premium on talent and this has led to inequalities in volume and prices on sales through the co-operative. there is, of course, no option for the co-ops but to take cognisance of the discrimination exercised by the market, if they want to stay in business, that is. the same process is at work in all areas of co-op activity. a business vocabulary in inuttitut had to be alternate routes vol. 5 1982 so developed and this had the double effect of preserving the purity of the language and modernizing it. basic business concepts and practices (profit-making, budgeting, cash accounting etc) had to be taught; workshop activities introduced; a nine to five workday instituted. by making employees out of some inuit and bosses/managers/directors out of others, the co-op has also succeeded in bringing about changes in leadership criteria. sorting inuit into better and best carvers and businessmen, the new criteria of selection makes it possible for younger men to attain authority over older men and, as arbess (1966:47) points out, the nature of the authority also changed since that "expected by the co-operative ... resided not in an individual but in his position." yet another acculturat ing effect of the co-ops proceeded from their efforts to integrate people into the community, "cutting across kinship barriers and religion and creating a solidarity" (treude, 1972:7). although the co-op has gone a long way towards cultural accommodation, it has always been hard-pressed to juggle prerogatives and there is evidence of a growing tendency to put the priorities of the system ahead of the needs or wishes of the people. when the carving market levelled off, for instance, efforts (in quebec) were directed at increasing the consumption level and profitability of goods sold from co-op retail stores in order to generate the profits necessary to keep the system growing. co-operative philosophy, however, is that the system exists to serve its members, "a true co-operative excluding any provision for profitmaking in the general si sense of the term" and being concerned, on the contrary, with "providing goods and services to members at cost"(braid, 1962:21). the decline of the co-operative even though the eskimo co-operative, a bastardized form of state property, was not internally generated, as collective institutions, all co-ops have the potential of assuming a dynamic of their own and of achieving unintended or intended political consequences. the prairie grain growers' co-operative, for instance, became the basis for populist political organization, whereas the maritime co-operative movement did not achieve broad-based political support. the northern co-operatives transformed the economic and social life of inuit and sparked a movement with strong nationalistic overtones. in arctic quebec, particularly, the co-ops functioned as "underground governments" (thomas sulluk, igalaaq , september, 1980). co-ops in northern quebec have always had a stronger ideological content than those in the northwest territories, the result of an informal movement headed by andre' steinman, the roman catholic missionary in povungnituk for many years, and p.e. murdoch, manager of the povungnituk hudson's bay company in the mid 50 's and general manager of the quebec federation since its incorporation in 1967. murdoch and steinman sold the co-operative as an evolutionary form, the natural successor to camp organization and the logical vehicle to bring inuit into a state of equal participation in the modern world. the frequently remarked evangelical flavour of alternate routes vol. 5 1982 52 the quebec movement is due, no doubt, to the involvement of the missionary and the ongoing appeals made to traditional values (see vallee, 1967:43). it is also due to the success of the co-op in povungnituk where people, once poorest among the poor, now have one of the highest standards of living in the canadian arctic. inuit from this community travelled all over arctic quebec to talk up co-ops, promoting them as a way for the people to catch up with the twentieth century and, at the same time, to regain their self sufficiency. this was a message that had great emotional appeal for people just beginning to realize and regret its loss. the co-operatives failed, however, to legitimate their power. until recently, the co-op was the only organized voice inuit had but it was treated as spokesman only reluctantly by the state who, beginning in the early 70's, began sponsoring local community councils as representatives of the people. these councils were a feeble concession to political power. under the guidance of government field staff, they talked about garbage disposal and loose dogs but had nothing to say on the larger issues of game management, education, land and resource use or local government. it was, for instance, the co-operatives which first pushed the issue of self-determination. in arctic quebec, the community councils and the co-operatives, at the latter's instigation, joined to petition the provincial government for regional government status in 1971. they succeeded in stimulating debate and attracting media and official attention to the cause of inuit self-determination but, although a bill was drafted (and translated), it was never s3 presented to quebec's national assembly. the regional government proposal failed because of federal government opposition, provincial government inactivity and inuit indecisiveness . the federal government's initial reaction was to urge inuit to join the provincial indian brotherhood, a move that would have been welcomed by quebec indians (then pressing their own territorial claims within quebec) since inclusion of inuit would have extended their claim to include most of quebec's territory. at the same time, the quebec government was pressing its territorial claims against the federal government. in 1962, jean lesage had announced quebec's intention of assuming what were then federal responsibilities in its northern regions and, by the late 60 's, the province was actively negotiating a take-over from the federal government. the federal attitude was that the transfer would be accomplished when the province was able to provide the services and the people ready to receive them. this meant that, for several years, duplicate federal services and staff were in place in arctic quebec (a provincial and a federal school, for instance), creating overlap and dissension. it was probably more than enough to make claims of yet another minority group seeking status most unwelcome. the failure of inuit to unite on the issue has been cited by co-op advisors as the factor most responsible for failure of the regional government movement. there were, i think, two reasons for this. in the first place, as williamson (1977:175) says, inuit "had always identified with family" and lacked "a real ethnic identity." in the second place, although alternate routes vol. s 1982 54 they were attracted by the idea of "being in charge" (for a change) , they were unable to conceive of themselves as actually being responsible for carrying on. although they were ideologically prepared, they lacked the security which comes from experience and economic stability. uneasy in towns which had a history of only ten to twenty years and possessing only weak links (through the federation) to outside support systems, inuit were afraid of losing the state services they had grown to rely on. they said they needed more time to talk about it and to arrive at a consensus (the traditional mode of decision-making) but there was no time. predictably, land and energy concerns forced the issue. the contemporary scene: development of a corporate structure eskimo politics was born in the 70 's when land claims were assuming some urgency and when the first generation of town born and bred inuit was approaching manhood. political and cultural organizations proliferated across the arctic at this time, often with overlapping membership as well as aims because of the small population they served. inuit tapirisat of canada was founded in 1972. in that year also, given that quebec inuit had refused to join the indian association, the federal government set up the northern quebec inuit association (nqia) . while arctic quebec inuit were still trying to make up their minds whether to continue lobbying for regional government status or to go along with the government's proposal to set up "their own," inuit, association, the decision was made for them. like the co-operative, nqia was 55 put into place, presumably with the idea that, once again, inuit would learn by doing. the state funded a willing group of inuit and nqia was a fait accompli with headquarters, operating funds and a mission: settlement of inuit aboriginal title in quebec. in 1975, nqia signed the james bay and northern quebec (jbnq) agreement, the first significant treaty ever signed by canadian inuit. prompted by quebec's intrusion into its northern territories to mount the james bay hydro-electric project, it is now law although it remains a source of great controversy among arctic quebec inuit. the 1977 referendum was 95 per cent in favour of the agreement but 34 per cent of the population abstained from voting in order to demonstrate their opposition to it ( gazette , november 17, 1980). three communities (povungnituk, ivujivik and sugluk) , comprising one third of the population, have formed a dissident association, inuit tungavinga nunami (known as itn) which continues to oppose the agreement, claiming that the powers of attorney which enabled nqia to negotiate on their behalf had been falsely represnted to them. they believed that they were merely empowering nqia to provide inuit assistance to quebec cree in their fight to halt construction of the james bay dam when they were, in fact, empowering nqia to negotiate settlement of their aboriginal title. the agreement is complex but, essentially, northern quebec inuit renounced claims to the land in return for $90 million which is to be distributed under the aegis of makivik corporation, established in 1978 as a non-profit alternate routee vol. 5 1982 56 channel to receive the compensation money and to create profit-making subsidiaries to benefit all of arctic quebec. there is growing disenchantment with the agreement and the president of makivik (and chief signatory to the agreement) has publicly announced his dissatisfaction with it. meanwhile, the itn position is that inuit are the rightful owners of the land and that they must have a government "that can make laws, be self-supporting financially, raise taxes and claim royalties from any activities in its territory" (sivouac , in proceedings , 1980:21). they continue to refuse services set up with agreement money, going so far as to boycott the schools until an arrangment was made directly with the provincial government, allowing them to by-pass makivik 's school board (kativik). although it has been the cause of some dissension within the co-operative movement, itn has been supported by federation staff who are, of course, sympathetic to its aims. itn does not have a lot of money available to fight the agreement but is attempting to raise funds to take its case to court. in the meantime, the defiance of its members continues to be signalled by a sign at the povungnituk airstrip which reads, in four languages, "welcome to the territory which has not been ceded, in spite of the james bay agreement." organization and activities of makivik corporation all arctic quebec inuit are shareholders in makivik whose publicised mandate is to develop profit-making enterprises for inuit and to protect their interests as an ethnic group 57 ( makivik corporation , n.d: 12). in other words, makivik is attempting, as are many third world countries, to secure development without westernization, in spite of the obvious fact that, as was pointed out in an official statement from inuit tapirisat : corporations are profit-making, thus forcing natives into non-native aspirations. there is only one real option in the corporate structure: make money or be a failure. there is virtually no aspect of the conceptual framework of a corporation that has a counterpart in native culture (the alaska native claims settlement, 1974:28-29) although it is too early to assess the kind of form makivik will ultimately assume, some initial trends may be noted: (1) a focus on large-scale, capital-intensive enterprise which employs a greater proportion of whites than natives (in part, to avoid problems with organized labour). although capitalintensive enterprise may mean a higher return to capital than is possible otherwise, in a situation of labour surplus, the only justification for choosing capital over labour intensive enterprise is the re-investment of capital gains to create more jobs (ruffing, n.d:41). makivik does not, however, appear to be making money. it has publicly announced operating losses on several of its ventures and its construction and fishing subsidiaries were recently terminated. (2) makivik has considerable access to government and to private loan money, the former in amounts not often available to co-ops and the latter, never available. (3) although there is not enough evidence to judge the merits alternate routes vol. 5 1982 £8 of their claim, the co-op people insist that, in many cases, makivik operations conflict and, in others, compete, with co-op programmes. one thing which is evident is that makivik is hiring away co-op personnel through the double attraction of higher wages and more prestige. although it must be assumed that dissatisfaction with the co-operative is also a factor here, the co-op is now in the position of being left with what has been described as "left-overs." the rise of makivik has meant a diminished role for co-ops which are now considered to be "guardians of the old way" while makivik (the name means "advancement") is in the forefront of development. (4) one of the most significant features of the makivik phenomenon is, i believe, the exacerbation of hitherto incipient class cleavages, with the emergence of a group of natives who, combining political and economic power, have achieved unprecedented mobility. described as the first eskimo millionaires, they present a "successful" image through the chartering of planes for international travel, their working relationship with lawyers and other white professionals and, generally, dressing and living in high style. the native corporate elite does not, as inuit have always done, deal with subordinates (civil servants and field personnel) but has access to the top financial and political echelon (bank presidents and cabinet ministers). they have clout with the mandarinate, although not as much as they would like. they were invited, for intance, to the constitutional conferences, but as s9 observers rather than participants. although it is beyond the scope of this paper to argue the point, the makivik group is wielding class-based power and authority, reserving decision-making and the lion's share of benefits for themselves and contributing to the marginal ization of the general population. conclusion it appears that makivik represents a move into full-scale capitalism which will mean, inevitably, marginal status for co-operatives. in the struggle to reproduce itself, the co-op has attempted to secure legitimation through ideological appeals to the "eskimo way." this is mainly an unsuccessful strategy for, while the past continues to exert an emotional tug on all inuit, there is, on the part of many, if not most, a desire for "progress." peter usher expresses some surprise that the native people show few signs of trying to negotiate a different, a non-western, lifestyle for themselves: "how come they didn't do something different?" apart from the fact that the tail seldom wags the dog, the answer has to be sought, i think, in the kinds of options and models available to them. we should not assume, in any case, that they share our self-critical attitude towards western civilization. usher's position is, i believe, rather idealistic (he admits as much) and the statement of girvan (1973:26) relevant: "it may all," or, at least, to a large extent, "depend upon the level of consumption to which a grup should aspire." this is not a psychologizing, reductionist explanation; for, aspirations alternate routes vol. 5 1982 60 are part of the ideological baggage. it is, after all, in the nature of contact that one group will be dominated politically, economically and ideologically. native aspirations as well as the native economy have been undergoing changes since the days of the whalers and there is no reason to assume that the process will stop here, which seems to be what berger (1977) and usher are recommending. some of their recommendations are, in fact, disconcertingly reminiscent of earlier state policies which aimed to improve, but, at the same time, to preserve the purity of eskimo life. with obvious input from usher, berger (1977:11: 39) recommends the development of two parallel economies in the north, industrialization and a native economy based on more vigorous exploitation of renewable resources: processing and manufacture of locally produced commodities could add significantly to employment and income. the chief opportunities in this direction appear to be fur tanning, garment manufacture, food processing, marine oil processing, saw milling, log and lumber construction, handicrafts and similar cottage industries, and tourism. 17 what this prescription amounts to is a way of ensuring that natives will never interfere with progress in the dominant sector. they are suggesting, really, the re-invention of the co-operative, ignoring the twenty year experiment which has been in progress across the arctic and the forces which led to the creation of makivik. they also ignore the limited possibilities for internal exchange and the fact that profits are in the non-renewable resource sector which gets priority in terms of social capital facilities. most of all, they ignore "the wishes of the people themselves ."some of whom are 61 demanding "progress" as measured against the western model. we may idealire a subsistence simple commodity producing/welfare lifestyle but there is little evidence to suggest that the native people want this or, even, will accept it for very much longer. the berger report is replete with statements to the effect that people want to hunt and trap as they always did. they also want jobs and we should not assume that, given a choice, they would opt for the "traditional" way of life over wage labour and the kind of social structure that goes 18 with it. at the very least, one must acknowledge a complexity of interests among native groups which, in spite of increasing evidence to the contrary, continue to be treated as homogeneous. charlie watt, president of makivik, speaks for a large faction when he asks: "do they want us to become antiques?" ( igalaaq , may, 1980). it is a rhetorical question, mirroring the same sort of sentiment expressed by james wah-shee (in pimlott et al., 1972:125): the oil and gas companies are doing exploratory work in the north and in the process doing some damage to the way of life of the native peoples... i don't think we are against northern development .. .what we are saying is that these changes need to be controlled for the betterment of the people who live north of 60', not for the big corporations who control the economy of canada. we realize that we have an abundance of natural resources in the north; we would like to share those resources, but we don't like to see them all shipped down south. the big question to be asked is whether development corporations, owned and managed in theory by native people and, in reality by a powerful group in concert with the state, can reverse underdevelopment. it seems to me that the answer lies in the manner in which capital is obtained. there are not many sources. alternate routes vol. 5 1982 62 it may be generated internally but the barriers to this are obvious. it may be obtained from the state which, although certainly capable of creating an artificial economy, does not have a good record. we have seen the kind of help it has given native enterprise, enough to cripple, not develop, the co-ops and enough to allow makivik to hang itself. the third source, and the only source which is compatible with some measure of autonomy, is taxes and royalties (which imply a political mandate). the co-op wanted this and the dissident group, itn, continues to hope for it. makivik, however, refused compensation in the form of royalties because it "thought they wouldn't amount to very much" (watt, in proceedings , 1980:57). the conclusion has to be that makivik, more state-owned than the co-operatives and serving the interests of an indigeneous elite, is unlikely to reverse the tide of underdevelopment. the state, it seems, succeeded in creating the spokesman it needed, so that the universe could continue to unfold as it should. notes although some native groups have expressed a desire to be called "inuit" rather than "eskimo," i have used the term interchangeably. i claim as my authority for doing so, several arctic quebec inuit who inform me that it matters more how they are treated than what they are called. besides, the topic demands at least the occasional use of the older term. the word "eskimo' is incorporated into the official names of some co-ops and "eskimo art, "has become a household word, carrying connotations not communicated by "inuit art." i assure anyone who might be offended by this usage that no derogation is intended. 63 2. there was some trading for specialities (soapstone for making lamps, polar bear skins etc) but, since my interest here is on post-contact developments, i am deliberately glossing over the complexities of the pre-contact lifestyle. 3. in recent years, some groups have either moved or expressed an intention to move back to their old camping sites. 4. there are also several indian co-operatives in the arctic, some of which are affiliated with the eskimo co-ops. in the interests of clarity, however, i will ignore them in this discussion. 5. the quebec federation, managed by people without a co-op background, unamicably severed relations with the desjardins movement in 1970. federation personnel in the northwest territories tend, however, to be professional "co-operators." 6. over the years, numerous petitions have been sent to government and informal campaigns mounted to stop people buying and selling at the hudson's bay company. 7. co-op wages are geared to a standard of living consistent with the inuit culture but not competitive, although the gap is narrowing under pressure from the population. 8. in 1979, arctic quebec co-ops paid out app . $1.5 million for the purchase of arts and crafts. 9. this is still more or less the case. with only a few exceptions, banks refuse to make major loans to native co-ops unless backed by a government guarantee. 10. the information which follows is based, primarily, upon data contained in beaulieu, 1980:44. 11. since this paper was written, a significant event has taken place. the quebec federation now owns the pipe lines, tank farms and oil and gas products in four northern quebec communities with the co-ops in those communities acting as distributors. these operations are expected to generate a healthy cash flow. 12. their non-offensive nature makes them doubly attractive. d.g. smith (1975:34) makes the point that whites selectively reinforce certain aspects of native culture, i.e., "decorative handicrafts, story-telling and dancing, which do not conflict with western values (nor compete with western products!). 13. this point was raised to the author at a meeting with carvers in wakeham bay, february 25, 1979. alternate routes vol. s 1982 64 14. when profits are made, a non-discretionary allocation of net operating surplus is made to a general reserve fund (to provide financial stability) and, on the recommendation of the delegates, the annual general meeting distributes the balance in one or a combination of three ways: (1) declaration of a patronage cash dividend (2) payment of a patronage share dividend or (3) retention of earnings to invest in development and to finance growing assets. 15. in an unpublished paper entitled "from talking chiefs to a native corporate elite," i have attempted to trace the birth of a class system among the inuit. the argument is that the makivik group actually form a native bourgeoisie. 16. from notes taken at a seminar given by peter usher at carleton university, january, 1981. 17. it will be remarked that all of these are activities which co-ops have tried and, for the most part, been forced to abandon. handicrafts and, to a lesser extent, tourism have proven to be the only practical ventures. i realise, of course, that the berger report is more of a political document than anything else. nonetheless, it has had considerable influence for which its authors must be held accountable. 18. it is interesting that the income security programme set up by the james bay agreement and which pays hunters to live on the land to hunt, has brought the response from some natives, not on the programme, that they will not hunt unless they, too, are paid for it (murdoch, private communication, september, 1981). references arbess, saul e. 1966 "social change and the eskimo co-operative at george river, quebec." ottawa: northern co-ordination and research centre. beaulieu, denis 1980 le nouveau quebec cooperat if . quebec: g"ouvernement du quebec, ministere des consommateurs , cooperatives et institutions financieres (in french) . berger, thomas 1977 northern frontier : northern homeland , volumes i and ii. ottawa: supply and services canada. 65 braid, a.f. 1962 "the role of co-operatives in social and economic planning." co-operative digest , vol. 5, no. 4 (winterj"! brody, hugh 1975 the people ' s land , eskimo and whites in the eastern arctic . middlesex : penguin books ltd. facts 5 figures 1980 booklet published by the canadian arctic co-operatives' federation limited and la federation des cooperatives du nouveauquebec . gazette 1980 montreal, november 17. girvan, norman 1973 "the development of dependency economics in the caribbean and latin america: review and comparison." social and economic studies , vol. 22, no. 1 . igalaaq 1980 ottawa: nortext, september and may issues. makivik corporation n.d. hand-out from makivik corporation minutes 1978 of a meeting on eskimo art, held at the airport-hilton hotel in montreal. myers, marybelle 1977a (ed) davidialuk . montreal: la federation des cooperatives du nouveau-quebec . 1977b "the people of povungnituk, independent through a common effort," in jean blodgett (ed) povungnituk . winnipeg: the winnipeg art gallery. 1981 "from talking chiefs to a native corporate elite," unpublished paper, carleton university. murdoch, p.e.m. 1981 personal communications in april and september. phalen, terry 1974 "an appraisal of co-operative development in arctic canada," unpublished report to the canadian arctic co-operatives federation limited, yellowknife. 66 pimlott, douglas h., vincient, kitson m. , mcknight .christine e. feds) 1972 arctic alternatives . ottawa: canadian arct ic resources committee . proceedings 1980 the third arctic co-operative conference, george river, april. rea, k.j. 1968 the political economy of the canadian north toronto : university of toronto press. robertson, gordon i960 "administration for development in northern canada: the growth and evolution of government." canadian publ ic administration , vol. ill, no. 1 (december) . ruffing, lorraine turner n.d. "the navajo nation: a history of dependence and underdevelopment," publisher unknown. simard, jean-jacques 1972 "la revolution congelee," unpublished essay, laval university. smith, derek g. 1975 natives and outsiders : plural ism in the mackenzie river delta , northwest territories . ottawa : indian and northern affairs. the alaska native claims settlement: a report on a trip to alaska by representatives of the itc 1974 ottawa: inuit tapirisat of canada treude, e. 1972 "genossenschaften in der kanadischen arktis," polarforschung , xlii, nr. 2 (1972), s. 138-150. (translation used) vallee, frank g. 1967 povungnetuk and its cooperative : a case study in community change , ottawa : northern coordination and research centre. williamson, robert g. 1977 the boothia peninsula people : social organizat ion~in spence bay , n. w.t . , unpublished study for the settlement council of spence bay and the polar gas project. multiple files are bound together in this pdf package. adobe recommends using adobe reader or adobe acrobat version 8 or later to work with documents contained within a pdf package. by updating to the latest version, you’ll enjoy the following benefits: • efficient, integrated pdf viewing • easy printing • quick searches don’t have the latest version of adobe reader? click here to download the latest version of adobe reader if you already have adobe reader 8, click a file in this pdf package to view it. http://www.adobe.com/products/acrobat/readstep2.html 978-1-926958-01-9 139 play review multinational [g]rape corporation written and directed by ozgur cinar, performed by ozgur cinar and chara berk. 2010. reviewed by: aaron henry1 “welcome to the market time. everything has turned into a market today ergo it is not that surprising to see urinals exhibited in museums”. enter multinational [g]rape corporations (mgc), the play that took this year’s ottawa fringe theatre and arts festival by storm, winning the outstanding original work award. yet reviews of this play, for the most part, have entirely missed what is truly outstanding about it. while several reviews have praised the actors, who were indeed electrifying, or marveled over the irreverence and the spectacle of the play, none of them have discussed the meaning of this play. the meaning has been largely shoved aside, one reviewer even went so far as to suggest that “it defies explanation” (marr, 2010). this is disappointing because it is in the structure of the play where cinar’s brilliance, the play’s originality and its message lie. it is, then, the architecture of the play that needs to be given attention, if mgc is going to be reviewed for not just its spectacle but for its internal content. however, the two are necessarily interdependent. the set of the play is austere. it features a table and two chairs upstage, a suitcase full of different props and two squares on the floor formed by red-tape labeled security. the play opens with a man and a women vomiting through a slit in the closed curtain while eating and drinking behind it, a married couple who are the key subjects of the play. the play scrolls through many different locales in capitalist society, ranging from the interior of an immigration office where the man is made to pay over and over again to gain permanent residency; a doctor’s office where tapeworms are removed from the woman—played indomitably by chara berk— 1 aaron henry is a ma student at carleton university in the department of political economy. he can be reached at ahenry2@connect.carleton.ca multinational [g]rape corporation 140 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research where, as a consequence, the doctor informs her of not eating organic food; the first date between the married couple, to a scene of protest against exploitation. each of these scenes closes with the couple’s retreat to the table. the next scene begins with the transformation of the woman, following a sound cue that imitates defecation, into an advertisement for different products and services ranging from fair-trade coffee, cds or for a holiday vacation. following this metamorphosis of the woman into a commodity, the couple retreats into their respective security boxes where the man, played by cinar, attempts to commit suicide over and over again to no avail. this structure has a number of important effects that taken together form cinar’s critique of capitalist society—a critique that goes far beyond being merely anti-consumerist and anti-security, as other reviewers have commented on. foremost, the play is presented as a number of instances between subjects. the thread of unity that binds these instances is not that of unified characters with a linear narrative but the existence of the market within these relations. this is perhaps epitomized by the scene where the man applies for a study permit and then a permanent residency card to integrate into canada. this scene unfolds as primarily a monetary 141 relationship between the man and the canadian immigration officer who remains alienated from the man and treats him from a distance established by both the cash relationship and the sterile rationality of the bureaucracy. similarly, on the couple’s first date the romantic evening is disrupted as the woman laments that she must “take a dump” but that they can’t afford access to a toilet. the scene sublimates the tender moment of the couple back into the market. the love between them cannot exist without the commodification of the most basic and biological human needs. multinational [g]rape corporation 142 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research mgc produces its scenes around subjects that are produced by market relations. this forecloses on the unified character one would find in the classic plays of shakespeare, jonson, wilde, synge, etc. and substitutes this character for a fragmented subject that develops and disappears in line with the market relations that cinar exposes. the play progresses not as a linear narrative but as a process of interaction between fragmented subjects as the man and woman transform before the audience, into police officers, immigration officials, doctors, waiters and lovers. the subjects are then formed in context to the power relations that develop within capitalist society and, as such, they develop and disappear discontinuously and through this disclose the totality of these relations. this structure conveys the message that the market has fully crept into social life, to the degree where one is at once an advertisement and a person. living under these conditions produces a number of contradictions that constitute the insanity and hypocrisy of living in capitalist society. market society then, produces not only fragmented subjects but the complete fragmentation of social life. this fragmentation allows the brutality of capitalism to colonize the human condition. as cinar laments, we get urinals next to the wonders of human history, cosmetics next to the death tolls in afghanistan and iraq, the marketing of vacations alongside brutal exploitation and dictatorship. cinar reveals the societal response to this through the couples retreat to their own private security boxes, provided to them by the market. in this sense, the complete commodification of social life finds its terminal point of expression in the partitioning of our own social beings from these processes and our own feeble attempts to secure ourselves from them. the consequences mgc aptly shows is the reinforcement of our own alienation from ourselves and from each other, precisely because we all form part of capitalist society. the man, in particular, is a paragon of this reality as he attempts suicide in his own private security box to end his imprisonment from the market only to be distracted by the very processes he revolts against in disgust. his repeated failure to commit suicide is caused by his inability to see that he himself constitutes part of this market society. cinar in fact lays this theme out quite clearly and succinctly in the opening lines when the woman declares “we are the flowers of the commercial world. we are the vomit of the commercial world”. they, like all of us, are at once both of these things, nurtured and cared for as consumers, the subjects of society and at once the objects of it the refuse, the labourers who are exploited to constitute its existence. the tragedy and insanity is that the couple cannot recognize themselves as the subjects that constitute the processes that transform them into these wretched objects. 143 this is one of the central messages of mgc. the structure of the play conforms to that of capitalist society insofar as capitalist society cannot be understood through a single narrative. instead it can only be understood under the fragmentary conditions its relations of exploitation and alienation produce. superficially this reality appears disjointed, chaotic, and beyond explanation. however, with greater focus we see ourselves as the subjects of capitalist society that constitute these relations. our imprisonment to the market stems from the fact that we ourselves play a part, much like the man and woman, in the exploitation and alienation that constitute capitalist society. in the end we cannot understand this reality; we have after-all “only applied for cleaner, dish-washer or waiter positions”. we don’t understand that in these positions we ourselves are both the subject and object of these processes. cinar’s play is a scream to see outlining this insanity. as such, cinar’s play constitutes an important critique of capitalism in canadian society and warrants engagement by all. references marr, den. fully fringed, june 28th, 2010. www.fullyfringed.ca photos by a. erdem ozcan. multinational [g]rape corporation 144 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research whole book pdf alternate routes science as capitalist ideology: the sociology of max weber reconsidered randle w. nelsen abstract max weber's sociology is viewed within the conteat of the changing socio-economic arrangements of his time. in attempting to develop a value-neutral sociology by creating a superhuman sociologist, weber in fact creates the persistent capitalistic valuebias of a sociology which reproduces the major characteristics of socio-economic reforms initiated by bismarck and his immediate successors. this bias makes capitalism interchangeable with bureaucracy, and the crucial "social-political problem" becomes the development of independent political leadership rather than the unequal distribution of profits among socio-economic classes. as with his super scientist, weber creates as problem-solver a super agent of change, the charismatic political leader, whose charisma becomes routinized to help ensure the continued capitalistic domination which weber's sociology supports. introduction max weber's sociology, in order to be most fully understood, should be viewed within the context of the changing socio-economic arrangements of his time. in germany, as in the united states, the transition from laissez faire to corporate capitalism contributed to, and was accomplished during, a period (c. 1865-1900) of severe 34 capitalist ideology economic disturbances (engels 1887-88; williams 1966). l the task of bringing stability to the german economy during the last third of the nineteenth century became in large part the responsibility of one man — germany's most charismatic leader prior to adolph hitler, chancellor otto von bismarck. this paper argues that the sociology developed by weber can be linked to the socio-economic reforms initiated by bismarck and his successors -reforms which were, like weber's sociology, favorable to the development of capitalism in its new corporate form. bismarck's reforms joined the interests of the more liberal professional and middle classes into which weber was born and the more conservative upper-class junkers with the interests of german workers. he promised direct universal vote in the election of parliament and worker security with a government-sponsored insurance program. he also endorsed and protected limited incorporation and trade combinations. the combined effect of these reforms was to provide bureaucratic support for an emerging corporate capitalism made synonymous with allegiance to the fatherland --a combination of factors that constitutes the central focus of weber's scientific sociology. 4 ironically, in his attempt to eliminate value bias by creating a superhuman sociologist capable of separating scientist from citizen (political) self, weber in fact creates the persistent capitalistic value bias that characterizes his sociology. in attempting to neutralize his analysis by maintaining a distinction between the 35 alternate routes socio-economic policy of politics and the objective requirements of science, weber attempts to provide scientific respectability for a sociology harmonious with, and subservient to, the new corporate arrangements of bismarck's nationalistic capitalism. specifically, weber's science serves as an attempt to legitimize capitalism because it makes bureaucracy as a form of social organization equivalent to, and interchangeable with, the existent division of labor produced by modern capitalism (giddens 1972). thus, through a process of substitution, bureaucracy rather than capitalism, the development of independent political leadership rather than the fact that one class profits by the labor of another, becomes the central problem of the german socio-economic order (see cohen 1972 and wright 1974-75) scientist weber provides citizen weber with a solution to this problem, the leader with charisma. however, in the final analysis, even this agent of change -the charismatic political leader -attempts to provide individualistic opposition to the status quo by working from within bureaucracy/capitalism, cooperating with the privileged social strata in cooling (routinizing) charisma. weber's faith in the charisma of a super change agent -the logical extension of, and counterpart to, his super scientist -is transformed into a faith in prevailing socio-economic arrangements. in brief, the salvation urged by weber's sociology helps ensure the continuation of capitalistic domination. 36 ' capitalist ideology bismarck, the junkers, and weber: an emphasis upon administrative efficiency bismarck created governmental policy without bothering to consult the great majority of the governed; he simply made decisions for them. the german tradition had long supported leadership of this type. in his summary of the germans' "war of liberation" against napoleon in 1813, a. j. p. taylor refers to this legacy of executive rule: . . . thus germany passively endured the war of liberation, just as previously it had endured conquest by the french and before that the balance of the system of westphalia. the allies defeated the french, but they could not undo the effects of french rule; and they had to devise a new system for germany which would serve the interests of europe, as previously the napoleonic system had served the interests of france. the people of germany were not consulted. they could not be consulted. as a political force they did not exist. [taylor 1945, p. 46] fifty years later bismarck was engaged in developing an increasingly self-serving power with which he could make sure that most germans still "did not exist" as a political force -a power that was soon to make him, as imperial chancellor, the chief administrator of his "new system for germany." during bismarck's rule weber, born in 1864, was maturing as a liberal intellectual. weber's father, who came from a financially secure family of textile manufacturers in western germany, was a successful lawyer and national-liberal parliamentarian; his mother, "a woman of culture and piety whose humanitarian and religious interests were not shared by her husband" (bendix 1962, p. 1). what weber's parents did share was their active involvement in attempting 37 alternate routes to increase the political influence of a declining liberalism. their house served, for the first twenty-nine years of weber's life, as a meeting place for the coalition of prominent politicians and professors from the university of berlin responsible for developing liberal opinion -that opinion which was so easily dominated by the autocratic rule of bismarck. this domination was made possible by skillful administration of a tariff system that restored the financial security of prussia's aristocratic landowners, the junkers. bismarck's administrative skill permitted him to develop what appeared to be a policy of national unity, while in actuality he was fashioning an economic reality in accordance with his now-famous statement to one of the liberals in 1848: "i am a junker and mean to benefit by it." the junkers were somewhat unique as an aristocratic class of landholders in east prussia. in contrast with the landowners of western europe, they were not a leisured class (see shuster and bergstraesser 1944, pp. 58-59). as owners of colonial lands they worked their estates themselves, without tenants: . . . the junker estates were never feudal; they were capitalist undertakings, which closely resembled the great capitalist farms of the american prairie -also the result of a colonial expropriation of the american indians. the junkers were hardworking estate managers, thinking of their estates solely in terms of profits and efficiency, neither more nor less than agrarian capitalists. [taylor 1945, pp. 28-29] in brief, the prussian junkers were "too poor to afford the aristocratic luxury of unbalanced accounts; and they brought to the 38 capitalist ideology affairs of state the same competence as was demanded on their own estates" (taylor 1945, pp. 60-61). thus, it is not surprising that the prussian tariff of 1818, which gave at least moderate protection to the junkers, marked the beginning of the first tariff system in all of europe. to return to the description of the junkers offered by taylor (1945, p. 61), "it was their application at the office desk which kept them afloat" as europe's most durable, hereditary governing class. the junker emphasis on administrative efficiency was the distinguishing characteristic of the professional and intellectual middle classes into which weber was born. it was these classes that still dominated the relatively small towns of germany in 1848, the year the german masses revolted against the military monarchies in vienna and berlin. these uprisings, the response of the unemployed to germany's first general economic crisis in winter 1847-48, led to a centralizing of power and the calling of a national assembly at frankfort. the work of this assembly revealed and strengthened the administrative tie that permitted the liberal, middle-class professionals to unite with the more conservative, upper-class junkers to dominate the german masses. the bonds of this liberal union -a union to which weber was later to lend scientific legitimation in his writings on social science methodology and bureaucracy -were cemented by force. the frankfort liberals, lawyers and professors, wanted to create a united germany by consent. however, as the class analysis of karl 39 alternate routes marx (1851-52, especially p. 71) clearly shows, they were frightened of the "disorder" being created by the revolutionary masses; consequently and paradoxically, the liberals increased their own vulnerability to the decisive power of the armed state by turning away from politics of consent to support the repressive activities of the armed forces as being essential to their cause of national security. as a commissioned officer, weber also considered the armed forces essential to this cause. his reliance on persuasion by force was made clear in a speech delivered to the 1907 congress of the verein fur sozialpolitik . speaking of the future of the social democratic party weber issues this warning: ... if the party seeks political power and yet fails to control the one effective means of power, military power , in order to overthrow the state, its dominance in the community and in public corporations and associations would only show its political impotence more distinctly, and the more it thought to rule simply as a political party and not objectively , the sooner it would be discredited. [mayer 1955, p. 65] weber's year of military training in 1883-84 had turned his initial condemnation into objective admiration of the requirements of military discipline. converted by his training experience to believe that the body works more precisely when all thinking is eliminated, weber apparently found considerable appeal in this partitioned view of men; taking leave from his university studies, he returned to strassburg for summer exercises in 1885 and again in •87, and participated in more military maneuvers a year later in posen (see gerth and mills 1946, p. 8). some twenty-five years 40 capitalist ideology later he was anxious to march at the head of his company in a world war about which he said: "in spite of all," it was " a great and wonderful war" (gerth and mills 1946, p. 22). while his health would not permit his participation as a leader of a company, he did serve from august 1914 to the fall of 1915 as a disciplinary and economic officer in charge of operating nine hospitals in the heidelberg area. with the peace of 1918, weber called upon "the designated war criminals" among germany's political leaders to offer their heads to the enemy as compensation for the mistakes they had made in conducting the war. his hope was that this offering would restore prestige to the german officer corps he so dearly loved -a love clearly shown in this answer to a favorite student's question concerning his post-war political plans: "i have no political plans except to concentrate all my intellectual strength on the one problem, how to get once more for germany a great general staff" (mayer 1955, p. 107). weber's emphasis on the importance of developing this general staff supported the cause of the liberals, which was also that of the junkers -namely, the protection of the capitalistic socioeconomic arrangements by which they were profiting. thus, the frankfort assembly's answer to the riots of the unemployed in the cities, and the more widespread general uprisings which followed, was a government without power to change existent socio-economic conditions. the central power legitimized by the frankfort assembly, 41 alternate routes referred to by marx (1851-52, p. 56) as "the parliament of an imaginary country," gave every appearance of having all the qualities of government; however, the imperial constitution creating this government was "a mere sheet of paper, with no power to back its provisions" (marx 1851-52, p. 114): ... as to the legal force of the decrees of the assembly, that point was never recognized by the larger governments, nor enforced by the assembly itself; it therefore remained in suspense. thus we had the strange spectacle of an assembly pretending to be the only legal representative of a great and sovereign nation, and yet never possessing either the will or the force to make its claims recognized. . . . thus the pretended new central authority of germany left everything as it had found it. [marx 1851-52, p. 54] when bismarck became the central power he, like the frankfort liberals of 1848, created a hollow government. however, it was a hollowness of a different kind in that it stemmed not from a lack of centralized power, but rather, precisely the opposite condition -that is, bismarck's administrative ability to efficiently consolidate and concentrate power which flowed from his own position as imperial chancellor. bismarck's socio-econoraic reforms: the administration of corporate economic unity the government fashioned by bismarck provided an illusion of power widely-dispersed. it was based on bismarck's 1866 proposal to establish a german parliament elected by direct universal vote, the junkers, perhaps the weakest and most reactionary group in 42 capitalist ideology germany at that time, were forced to accept this proposal in order that they might appear to be aligned with policy that was both powerful and progressive; thus, they were placed in a "ruling" position by bismarck while at the same time, they were being made accountable to him. so too were both the professionals and merchants of the middle classes and the working class who endorsed the proposal and accepted junker rule; the former were promised continued prosperity through the reinforcement of ties that strengthened their bond with the junkers, while the latter was convinced that the vote would bring social security. "the only loss was freedom, and that is not an item which appears in a balance sheet or in a list of trade union benefits" (taylor 1945, p. 108). 9 freedom to the liberals of the middle classes became transformed, under junker rule, from a desire for "liberal government" into a wish for "liberal administration." thus, the administrative talent of the prussian general staff that directed the war of 1870, became, under bismarck's direction, ever more efficient at achieving liberal demands without relinquishing power. as with the parliamentary proposal of 1866, bismarck initiated reforms designed to maintain the reality of his autocratic rule by retaining the image or appearance of pluralism. this was accomplished, as the following description makes clear, by encouraging development of the corporate capitalism upon which the liberal-junker alliance was based. the bismarckian order of 1871 had a simple pattern: junker prussia and middle-class germany, the coalition which sprang from the 43 alternate routes victories of 1866 . . . between 1867 and 1879 the german liberals achieved every liberal demand except power: ;ind in germany the demand for power had never bulked large in the liberal programme. never have liberal reforms been crowded into so short a period. . . . germany was given at a stroke uniform legal procedure, uniform coinage, uniformity of administration; all restrictions on freedom of enterprise and freedom of movement were removed, limited companies and trade combinations allowed. it is not surprising that in face of such a revolution the liberals did not challenge bismarck's possession of power: he was carrying out their programme far more rapidly than they could ever execute it themselves. [taylor 1945, pp. 122-123] endorsing limited incorporation and trade combinations, bismarck tied his own position of power and the security of the liberals' middle-class status position ever more closely to the development of capitalism in its new corporate form. thus, the end of the free trade era -heralded by the 1873 financial panic which marked the beginning of severe depression in germany and the rest of europe, and in the united states as well -was met by bismarck's policy favoring development of the kartells that fixed prices and regulated production during the 1880s. while the liberals received governmental support for industrial consolidation, the new capitalism required bismarck -somewhat against his will, because it was a step towards the greater germany he was resisting *" _-to further stabilize emerging socio-economic arrangements by implementing a policy that would protect the junker position. the moderate tariff of 1879, and the much higher tariffs of the 1880s, lessened the possibility that the newly-built railways of russia and the american continent could provide enough cheap grain to destroy german agriculture. in brief, 44 capitalist ideology it was a policy that not only made secure the junker position, but it also created allegiance to bismarck on the part of small farmers in east prussia; they, much more than the junker managers of large estates, needed protection. this protection, the method by which bismarck retained and strengthened his control over the liberals, junkers, and small farmers, was soon extended to the working class -the wage laborers. in exchange for their liberty -their freedom to oppose bismarck -between 1883 and 1889 he established for german workers a compulsory insurance program against sickness, accident, and old age. this program of social security was yet another indication of bismarck's administrative genius; not only did he manage to organize worker security at no expense to the state -it was subsidized for the state by employers and the workers themselves -but he also used the good will engendered by the program to collaborate with his rivals and eventual successors, the social democrats (see roth 1963, especially pp. 212-248). bismarck's administrative legacy : the bethmann conscience and weber's sociology the new chancellor of 1890, general leo von caprivi, carried on the bismarck tradition by giving empha; is to efficient organization and administration. while caprivi 's integrity was incorruptible, he was also politically inexperienced. his government, often ignoring the fact that power remained centralized in relatively few hands, 45 alternate routes was barely able to avert several potential economic crises -the army law renewal of 1893 is probably the most well-known example -by administering at least temporary unity among the various socioeconomic classes. caprivi's successors, prince chlodwig hohenlohe and then prince bemhard von bu'low, placed even more emphasis upon, and were considerably less discreet about, creating economic unity. bulow's germany of 1900 was searching for "world policy" that would provide an outlet for the overproduction of a rapidly maturing industrial capitalism; and the chief accomplishment of bulow's administration was that his minister of finance, johannes von miquel -a frequent guest in weber's parents' house -quite simply was able to buy, with the high tariff of 1902, the support of the prussian junkers for the reich. bulow's successor in 1909, theobald von bethmann-hollweg, was, even more markedly than bismarck and his other predecessors, an administrator. the descendent of a frankfort family that had for generations supplied the state with bureaucrats, bethmann became a civil servant who exemplified the "objective" bureaucrat-statesman that weber's sociology idealized. thus, while bethmann has been described by taylor (1945, p. 160) as "cultured, sympathetic, honest, he ran over with good intentions," it was his administration that most truly fulfilled bismarck's "blood and iron" promise of 1862 by leading germany into world war one and military rule. . . . all he lacked was any sense of power; and so it came about that this 'great gentleman' became, through his very irresponsibility, 46 capitalist ideology responsible for the agadir crisis, for the military violence at saverne, for the violation of belgian neutrality, for the deportation of conquered peoples, and for the campaign of unrestricted submarine warfare -crimes a good deal beyond bismarck's record, all extremely distasteful to bethmann, but all shouldered by his inexhaustible civil servant's conscience. it was useless, one night say dishonest, for him to have a high character: his sin was to belong to a class which had failed in its historic task and had become the blind instrument of power which it could not itself master. bismarck had said in 1867: 'let us put germany into the saddle. she will ride'; but in reality he had been the rider and germany the horse. now bethmann threw the reins on the horse's back. [taylor 1945, p. 160] the bethmann conscience that helped shape max weber's germany is precisely what weber advocates and encourages as he develops his sociology. the violence that resulted from bethmann' s attempt to be value neutral is herein viewed as nothing more nor less than weber's attempt to transfer the supposed objectivity of his science to bureaucracy. the result was a scientific equation that attempted to link the social organization of bureaucracy with the socio-economic arrangements of a nationalistic corporate capitalism -to make capitalism as value-neutral as weber believed bureaucracy was. such objectivity was, among other things, to form the core of the kind of education weber thought necessary to reconstruct war-torn germany. in a 1918 letter addressed to a frankfort colleague he writes: " 'objectivity' (sachlichkeit) as sole means to achieve pureness and the feeling of shame against the disgusting exhibitionism of those who are morally broken down --only this will provide us with a firm attitude ..." (see mayer 1955, p. 65). for weber, this objective 47 alternate routes attitude was fostered by the supposedly value-neutral social organization of bureaucracy and he celebrated, patterning his science after, the increasing efficiency with which modern government from bismarck to bethmann was able to exclude "love, hatred, and every purely personal . . . feeling from the execution of official tasks" (see bendix 1962, p. 483). l2 weber's objectivity: scientific schizophrenia in his essay on " 'objectivity' in social science and social policy" weber argues that "it can never be the task of an empirical science tc provide binding norms and ideals from which directives for immediate practical activity can be derived." [weber (1904) 1949, p. 52] "existential knowledge" is to be distinguished from "normative knowledge" -what "is" must be separated from what "should be." [weber (1904) 1949, p. 51] for weber, scientific analysis cannot directly evaluate the appropriateness of a given goal or end, but only the appropriateness of the means for achieving that end. [see weber (1904) 1949, pp. 52-54] in order to maintain this view that social science ("the analysis of f.icts") cannot directly address questions of social policy ("statement of ideals") weber introduces a scientific rationality that permits the sociologist to detach, at least partially, science from its cultural context. thus, weber's sociologist is allowed to consider, and be influenced by, cultural surroundings only in the initial stages of research and only on the condition that motives and afi capitalist ideology values remain "scientifically oriented." ... in social sciences the stimulus to the posing of scientific problems is in actuality always given by practical "questions." hence the very recognition of the existence of a scientific problem coincides, personally, with the possession of scientifically oriented motives and values. . . [weber (1904) 1949, p. 61] as research progresses, this cultural influence that initially helps to determine the scientific problem can be, in weber's view, carefully controlled by the social scientist. capable of distinguishing between "scientifically oriented" values and "normative standards," weber's sociologist uses scientific wisdom to separate empirical from normative self -the objective-scientist self leaves questions concerning social policy to be answered by sentimental-citizen self: ... it should be constantly made clear to the readers (and -again we say it -above all to one's self!) exactly at which point the scientific investigator becomes silent and the evaluating and acting person begins to speak. in other words, it should be made explicit just where the arguments are addressed to the analytical understanding and where to the sentiments . . . [weber (1904) 1949, p. 60] in this manner weber reasons a scientific schizophrenia that permits the sociologist to develop a value-relevant understanding of social reality without making value judgments, [see weber (1904) 1949, pp. 55-56] the result is a sociology that is shaped by weber's efforts to be value neutral -to separate his scien:ific from his political (citizen) self. this separation can be viewed as an important heuristic device aiding weber in exploring and explaining the rationality of his scientific methodology. this separation can also be viewed as 49 alitknait kuuitb being largely responsible for prohibiting weber from sufficientlyexploring and explaining the logic of the way in which value judgments influence the practice of social scientists. in failing to attend to this matter of value rationality weber is unable to adequately understand either the content of, or be clear about when he is moving between, the two selves and their respective worlds which he creates. ironically, then, it is precisely the movement between these two worlds, a separation weber made with the intention of eliminating bias, which accounts for the persistent value bias that characterizes his sociology -namely, his scientific support of capitalism. schizophrenic objectivity and weber's capitalism = bureaucracy equation the science that allows weber to distinguish between and separate means from end, fact from value, objective knowledge from emotional action as he moves between his scientist and citizen worlds also facilitates a separation sf the economic from the political. this dichotomy permits weber in defining power--"the possibility of imposing one's will upon the behavior of other persons" (see rheinstein and shils 1954, p. 323) -to make a further distinction between voluntary agreement and authoritative imposition. [weber (1925) 1947, pp. 148-149] it is this split which in turn forms the basis for weber's distinction between interest groups, the primary focus of his economic sociology, and types of authority, 50 capitalist ideology the major concern of his political sociology. [see weber (1925) 1947] 1s the result of this bifurcation of reality is that weber obscures the interrelationships between the agreements of interest groups and the imposition of authorities; as jean cohen (1972, p. 65) and more recently, erik olin wright (1974-75, pp. 94-95) have argued, domination becomes the "authoritarian power of command" as weber locates power not in economic relations of class, but in the political relations of bureaucracy. for weber, the primary characteristic of bureaucratic social organization is the rationalized specialization of tasks, the development of a hierarchy of authority. as anthony giddens (1972) points out, this characteristic is also the most important, the most essential, feature of weber's rational capitalism -an economic system he defines as being "identical with the pursuit of profit, and forever renewed profit, by means of continuous, rational . . . enterprise." [weber (1904-05) 1958, p. 17] weber argues -to follow the giddens thesis -that the labor of administrative officials is like the labor of the workers whom they administer (control), "expropriated" from the means of production by the bureaucratic form of social organization. this separation of administrative staff from the material means of administrative organization allows weber to equate managers with workers; similarly, it also serves to equate bureaucracy with, and to legitimate, the existent division of labor produced by modern capitalism. (see giddens 1972, pp. 34-36) much of weber's work, in addition to his writing on bureaucracy, 51 is concerned with the development of capitalism in germany. his doctoral dissertation of 1889 examined the various legal principles by which medieval trading companies were allowed to combine in order to minimize the risk of private enterprise. subsequently, he studied the junker estates of east prussia and worker-motivation in his grandfather's linen factory in westphalia. his several speeches to the congresses of the verein fur sozialpolitik in 1905, 1907, 1909 and 1911, touched upon such topics as cartels and the state, economic communal enterprises, the growth of bureaucracy, and the problems of productivity and psychology of the working classes. in none of this work does weber ever seem to 18 fundamentally question the sanctity of capitalism. however, he is careful to promote a particular kind of capitalism. accordingly, in his 1909 speech weber decries the addiction to order produced by "the unquestioning idolization of bureaucracy." he argues that this "predilection for bureaucracy" is "a purely moral sentiment." therefore, he urges that this "belief in the unshakability of the undoubtedly high moral standard of german officialdom" be replaced with a more objective system. although this system would be based upon "the expansion of private capital, coupled with a purely business officialdom which is more easily exposed to corruption," it would help germany increase her 'power value', "the ultimate value," among the nations of the world. 19 [weber (1909) in mayer 1955, pp. 125-131] ten years later, amidst the post-war clamor for socio-economic arrangements that 52 capitalist ideology were more socialistic, weber again offers an "objective" defense of an "objective" capitalism: we have truly no reason to love the lords of heavy industry. indeed, it is one of the main tasks of democracy to break their destructive political influence. however, economically their leadership is not only indispensable, but becomes more so than ever now, when our whole economy and all its industrial enterprises will have to be organized anew. the communist manifesto quite correctly emphasized the economically (not the politically) revolutionary character of the work of the bourgeois-capitalist entrepreneur. no trade union, least of all a state-socialist official, can carry out these functions for us. we must simply make use of them, in their right place: hold out to them their necessary premium -profits -without, however, allowing this to go to their heads. only in this way today'. -is the advance of socialism possible. [giddens 1972, pp. 24-25] once again, weber's scientific schizophrenia permits him to posit a fragmented world -a world in which the development of a science that is objective links weber's sociology to a capitalism built upon the objectivity of bureaucracy. the value neutrality that supposedly results, in fact, creates the value bias of his impotent sociology. it is a sociology that can be nothing else but a legitimation of prevailing socio-economic arrangements -the arrangements of a german capitalism that weber himself referred to as "the fate of our time" (see loewith 1970, p. 119). thus, in perceptively criticizing those who mistake state-controlled cartel lization (monopolization) of profit and wage interests for the ideal of a "democratic" or "socialist" future, weber proceeds to characterize a viable alternative moving in the direction of 53 alternate routes this ideal, the organization of consumer interests, as a "pipe dream." [weber (1918) 1968, p. 1454] for weber, then, the development of a workable socialism must wait upon the capitalism of a refined state bureaucracy. in weber's sociology, capitalism becomes equated with, interchangeable with, bureaucracy. through a process of substitution the central problem of the german socio-economic order becomes bureaucracy, rather than capitalism; the problem is no longer economic, the fact that one class profits by the labor of another, but political -that is to say, bureaucratic. people do not dominate (control) one another; instead, hierarchical offices (bureaucratic roles) dominate each other (see cohen 1972; giddens 1972, p. 36). people "alienate" each other not because of the way in which interaction is affected by their relationship to the means of production, but because of their "objective" relationship to bureaucratic hierarchies. thus, weber focuses considerable attention on what he referred to as "the leadership 20 problem" (see wright 1974-7s, pp. 96-97). bureaucratic social change: the routinization of charismatic leadership weber was early aware that it was the political leaders elected by the people, and not the people or masses themselves, who safeguard capitalism, and the economic leaders "necessary premium 21 profits --", against "the dictatorship of the official." i bismarck regime had left germany with a strongly centralized s4 capitalist ideology bureaucracy unable, in weber's view, to provide the independent political leadership to carry out the "tasks of the nation" 22 (giddens 1972, p. 35). thus, in his 1895 inaugural lecture (antrittsrede) as professor of ecoromics at the university of freiburg, he speaks of the necessity for developing the political leadership of the economically prosperous bourgeoisie -leadership which would, without becoming despotic, "place the political powerinterests of the nation above all other considerations" (see giddens 1972, p. 17). the threatening thing in our situation ... is that the bourgeois classes, as the bearers of the pflkfirinterests of the nation, seem to wilt away, while thete are no signs that the workers are beginning to show the maturity to replace them. the danger does not . . . lie with the masses. it is not a question of the economic position of the ruled , but rather the political qualification of the ruling and as cending classes which is the ultimate issue in tn~e social-political problem. [giddens 1972, pp. 17-18] scientist weber provides citizen weber with a solution to this problem, the leader with charisma. this extraordinary individual, like weber's superhuman sociologist, is able to put his fragmented world back together again, protecting both the wilting bourgeoisie and the immature workers from the political dangers of bureaucracy/ capitalism. that these dangers, in weber's view, have little or nothing to do with class differences, the economic relationship between the rulers and the rulec, logically anticipates his particular kind of "voluntarism." in brief, it is a freedom of action that becomes rationally reserved for the super individual, the charismatic leader, whose personal magnetism "preaches, creates, 55 alternate routes or demands new obligations" [weber (1925) 1947, p. 361] of bureaucracy/capitalism. for weber, charismatic domination is, at least initially, the very opposite of bureaucratic domination. "pure" charisma is antithetical to all ordered economy. "it is the very force that disregards economy . . . where its 'pure' type is at work, it is the very opposite of the institutionally permanent" (gerth and mills 1946, p. 248). however, it is precisely this instability of charismatic authority which according to weber permits it to be fitted into the reality of socio-economic relations: . . . genuine charisma rests upon the legitimation of personal heroism or personal revelation. yet precisely this quality of charisma as an extraordinary, supernatural, divine power transforms it, after its routinization, into a suitable source for the legitimate acquisition of sovereign power by the successors of the charismatic hero. routinized charisma thus continues to work in favor of all those whose power and possession is guaranteed by that sovereign power, and who thus depend upon the continued existence of such power. [gerth and mills 1946, p. 262] charisma, then, becomes routinized to answer the "need of social strata, privileged through existing political, social, and economic orders, to have their social and economic positions 'legitimized'" (see gerth and mills 1946, p. 262). in the final analysis, even weber's super individual, the charismatic leader, must eventually cooperate in tailoring (routinizing) 'irrational" and "revolutionary' passions to fit the bureaucracy (the capitalism) of prevailing socio-economic arrangements. weber writes: "the routinization of charisma, in quite essential respects, is identical with adjustment to the conditions of the economy, that is, to the continuously 56 capitalist ideology effective routines of workaday life. in this, the economy leads and is not led" (see gerth and mills 1946, p. 54). 23 weber's antidote for this deadening effect of bureaucracy/ capitalism, is, as both cohen (1972) and wright (1974-75) point out, individualistic opposition -an opposition which is to be based upon acceptance of the prevailing normative definitions of the existent socio-economic system. even weber's chosen agent of change, the charismatic political leader, has no other alternative but to work from within bureaucracy/capitalism, cooperating with the privileged social strata in cooling charisma. the passions which initiate change are to be carefully monitored (routinized) to fall considerably short of that "carnival we decorate with the proud name of •revolution'." [weber (1919) 1946, p. 115] for weber, the point is not to alter the bureaucracy/capitalism that allows some individuals to dominate at the expense of others; rather, "the point is to salvage the soul against the impersonal, calculating formal rationality of domination" (cohen 1972, p. 82). 24 super leaders, superman sociologists, and weber's ideal type as stereotype the salvation urged by weber's sociology helps ensure the continuation of bureaucratic/capitalistic domination. both weber's "mildmannered daily reporter," the superman sociologist, and his charismatic leader can , like clark kent, "leap tall buildings at a single bound" -providing the appearance of transcending reality, while actually preserving it. weber's faith in the charisma of a 57 alternate routes super agent of change -the logical extension of, and counterpart to, his super scientist -is transformed into a faith in prevailing socio-economic arrangements. thus, while his charismatic leader and sociologist alike are able to momentarily transcend their cultural surroundings -the former at the outset, prior to the routinization of charisma, and the latter nearer the completion of value-relevant, but not value-biased, scientific work -they resign themselves to cultural influences at that point in their work most crucial to the maintenance of the established socio-economic system. in brief, the charismatic leader's' personal magnetism creates a passion that, in falling short of revolution, becomes locked into (routinized by) the prevailing socio-economic system. similarly, the superman sociologist's objectivity creates a science in which his problem-producing reality becomes locked into the "phone booth" 25 of weber's imagination -a science that leaves him incapable of emerging to observe how his sociology is changed by, but unable to change, existent socio-economic arrangements . weber's phone booth is the ideal type. it is this methodological technique that permits the transformation of citizen weber's empirical reality into the "mental constructs" cf scientist weber. he describes the ideal type as a research procedure in both negative and positive terms. it is not ideal in the sense of advocating something which ought to be. neither is it average in either the sense of a mediation or a summary of all traits common to a given phenomenon. it is not a 58 capitalist ideology proposition about reality which can be empirically verified as reality's "true" essence. thus, the ideal type is neither a hypothesis, nor can it be construed as an end in itself. rather, the ideal type is a technique, a means for constructing and testing hypotheses in order to facilitate comparisons of various aspects of the empirical world. according to weber: ... an ideal type is formed by the one-sided accentuation of one or more points of view and by the synthesis of a great many diffuse, discrete, more or less present and occasionally absent concrete individual phenomena, which are arranged according to those one-sidedly emphasized viewpoints into a unified analytical construct (gedankenbild) . in its conceptual purity, this mental construct ( gedankenbild) cannot be found empirically anywhere in reality. it is a utopia . . . [weber (1904) 1949, p. 90] however, while the ideal type is never actually found in reality, it must be "objectively possible." [weber (1904) 1949, p. 80] logical soundness, then, is the basis upon which such a type is to be accepted as a reliable tool for use in research designed to check its validity. emphasis on logic to construct abstractions which neither are fully realized in, nor are accurately representative of, the material world is often characteristic of another type, the stereotype. both the ideal type and the stereotype involve exaggerating certain key features, while ignoring certain other features, of a phenomenon for the purpose of organizing observation into categories. it is usually argued by weber's many current disciples that such a comparison is unfair, not legitimate. the ideal type, they contend, 59 alternate routes is a "scientific" tool used to guard against the tendency to stereotype -to type emotionally, using both preconceived beliefs and varied empirical data gathered from biased sources to emphasize negative characteristics. [weber (1904) 1949, especially pp. 90-91] such reasoning is, however, extremely weak protest, as it fails to dismiss the fact that both types can be formulated so as to meet weber's primary criteria of abstractness and logical soundness leading to objective possibility. the result of typing in both instances is often a "picture in the mind -a preconceived (i.e., not based on experience) standardized, group-shared idea" which has been oversimplified (hoult 1974, p. 319). the phenomenon examined is logically cleansed of its contradictions — made into "a pure abstraction of the understanding" (see mueller 1959) . the world becomes a matter of competing interpretations -definitions of the situation -with the appellation "scientific" used to distinguish among various typologies, withholding credibility from some and lending it to others. in sun, in constructing his sociology, weber carefully overlooks the primary fact concerning this competition: namely, that both the ideal type of the scientist and the stereotype of the citizen are, like all other abstractions, given a fixed form in the reality of everyday living by the powerful -usually at the expense of the less powerful. weber's inability to see that it is the powerful 's desire to replace symbols (definitions of the situation) no longer effective in dominating the less powerful which constitutes 60 capitalist ideology the new knowledge necessitating the construction of fresh ideal types, is scientific blindness attributable to the "objectivity" of his sociology. this objectivity, residing in the sociologist's scientific and not citizen self, is supposed to produce a science that is value neutral; instead, it encourages development of a body of knowledge that is subjective and biased -a sociology that permits weber to live in both his worlds without adequately understanding either one. it is a sociology that, like the ideal type which provides its basic insights, confuses appearances with the actualities of the social world it attempts to describe and analyze. thus, bureaucracy appears to be equatable with capitalism, manager with worker, people with offices, power with politics, political leadership with change. such confusion is characteristic of a science most concerned with preserving rather than changing the reality of prevailing socio-economic arrangements; a science that enlists the superhuman qualities of charismatic leaders and scientific sociologists to create a sociology which supports that which is, as opposed to that which might be. conclusion and present-day implications the sociology of max weber, above all else, is a science oriented towards preserving the rapidly maturing german capitalism of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. his justification of existing socio-economic arrangements was accomplished "objectively." for weber, the socio-economic arrangements of german capitalism at the turn of the century were not only "the fate" of his time, but also the facts "the truth is the truth," spoke weber from his deathbed in munich -61 alternate routes his last attempt to support the objective sociology which could alone give credence to these final words. since that june day in 1920 the many and varied implications of weber's objective science have been explored by his disciples and critics alike. there is one major implication which continues to be of primary importance: the "executive privilege" that has welded nationalistic passions to the developing multi-national economic system from bismarck to bethmann to pierre eliott trudeau, richard m. nixon and gerald r. ford, can be more readily extended to bureaucratic sociologists if scientific work is thought to exist in a realm of reason set apart from a sphere of sentiment. for modern social scientists this apparently objective sociology capable of separating values from facts, the political economy from science, has; been most appealing. it becomes even more appealing when combined with weber's bureaucracy-equals-capitalism analysis which gives considerable impetus to a trend he bemoaned -namely, the increasingly narrow range of choices open to most individuals as capitalism matures. such analysis makes it easier for modern sociologists to take a "factual" view of the dominant socio-economic arrangements of their day that is in harmony with weber's description of german capitalism in 1900 as "the fate of our time." in developing this view, they may be able to gain a measure of security for themselves by reproducing the curious paradox which makes it appear that weber's sociology mourns the decline and replacement of the cultivated and well-rounded individual by the technician, while it actually 62 capitalist ideology encourages a role of growing importance for the specialized expert -a professional. in sum, the most potentially dangerous suggestion implied by weber's legacy to present-day social scientists involves the possibility of their continued emphasis upon, and the consequent growth in importance of, objective sociology as the focal point of the professionalism which guides their scientific practice. dangerous, because it is a professionalism that encourages weber's social scientists to see themselves as members of interest groups of a particular kind -interest groups which they view as being somewhat autonomous from other groups in a society supposedly made more pluralistic ("democratic") by their presence. with objective training in a specific discipline, social scientists in the weberian mold claim the capability to stand apart from and control the passions that sway the masses. like weber, their "constellations of interest" give way to both charismatic leaders and superhuman sociologists who transcend the ordinary by pacifying passion in a professional manner. these educated and relatively autonomous professionals know the truth as weber saw it. also, their sociologies continue to develop arguments reiterating the most fundamental paradox characteristic of his science: the objectivity that is supposed to preserve the pluralism of choice among conflicting values, results instead in a value-partisanship -a partisanship that further strengthens the dominating position of a wealthy and privileged elite engaged in fashioning a capitalism that is increasingly one-dimensional. 63 alternate routes notes 1. the riots of unemployed germans and the nearly continual depression suffered by the americans from 1873 to 1898 called into question the central assumptions of laissez faire capitalism. the transition to corporate capitalism questioned the harmony between self-interests and the interests of the larger society, the "natural law" of supply and demand as automatic balance, and the state's role of non-interference with this natural law. as the state moved from its role of referee to that of regulator of economic activity, it repeatedly intervened to extend the limits of the marketplace and further concentrate industrial wealth in the holdings of a relatively few corporate capitalists. this process proceeded somewhat more rapidly in the united states than in germany. even so, the concentration of available german capital in banks, to take an important indicator of corporate development, was occurring at the same time (the last quarter of the nineteenth century), if not a little earlier, in germany than it was in the united states. by 1900 both countries were characterized by comparatively well-developed corporate economies. mann (1968, especially pp. 200-203) provides more details concerning the growth of corporate socio-economic arrangements in germany, and williams (1966) does the same for the united states. 2. the adjective charismatic is used here to indicate the fact that "specifically exceptional qualities," to borrow from weber's own definition of charisma, of bismarck's personality had important effects on the german masses. its use is not meant to suggest, however, that bismarck (or hitler) derived the power with which he ruled by personal magnetism alone. on the contrary, the governmental administration bismarck created is a near-perfect example of social organization designed to routinize charisma by legitimating power within the confines of bureaucratic routine. 3. with reference to the american economy, this link between socio-economic reforms which marked the transformation from laissez faire to corporate capitalism and the origins of a scientific sociology has been traced by smith (1965; 1970). with reference to the socio-economic reform of the german economy in relation to political leadership and the development of a scientific sociology, it should be noted that weber at times spoke against bismarck. [weber (1918) 1968, pp. 138s-1392; gerth and mills 1946, pp. 31-33; bendix 1962, pp. 443-444] however, the fact that weber sometimes denounced eismarck for his intolerance of independent-minded political leaders and his reliance upon advisors who were nothing more than docile and obedient servants of governmental bureaucracy, does not alter and should not overshadow the equally important, if not more important, fact that weber's sociology was a powerful reinforcement for -essentially an imitation of -bismarck's 64 capita n sx. laeoiogy bureaucratic administration. bendix (1962, p. 451) includes a brief note to the effect that weber exempted bismarck from his "wholesale indictment" of monarchical and bureaucratic absolutism. 4. this combination of factors constituting the central focus of weber's sociology was not new among german intellectuals. weber's notion of an "objective" science dates back at least to kant and hegel, as well as being clearly evident in the beliefs and actions of johann fichte. professor fichte of the university of berlin was an outspoken advocate of german nationalism -believing that the superiority of the german people made it imperative that the germans not only govern themselves, but also the french and all the other peoples of europe as well. fichte's nationalism was strongly supported by his conceptions of the nature of science and of the university setting within which it was taught. nearly 100 years before weber wrote about separating reason from emotion, fichte, evidently fearing that the outbreak of war in 1813 might bring emotional bias into his classroom, dramatically cancelled his lectures and retired to his study "until the liberation of the fatherland" (see taylor 1945, pp. 44-45). 5. the general point emphasized here has been well-made by blackburn (1969). he, like myself, emphasizes the interconnections between prevailing socio-economic arrangements and bureaucratic fatalism, charismatic leadership, and social change. the present paper attempts to elaborate these interconnections by offering a more detailed examination of weber's value-neutral methodology, the fundamental scientific base upon which weber's sociology rests. 6. for an excellent elaboration of the way in which bismarck attempted to create economic reality that would be in accord with this statement, see engels (1887-88, especially pp. 89-108). despite bismarck's close identification with the junkers, many biographers suggest that he was not raised as one (see, for example, taylor 1955, especially pp. 13-14). 7. some scholars claim that friederich engels and not marx was primarily responsible for writing the series of new york tribune articles bearing the title germany: revolution and counterrevolution . however, whether one chooses to cite engels as does leonard krieger, and link revolution and counter-revolution with engels' earlier work, the peasant war in germany , in order to demonstrate that they are continuous sections of a single theme, or whether one cites marx as is done here, is of li.ttle matter. • the important point is the marx-engels emphasis on analysis which focuses upon the composition and interactions of the different socio-economic classes before and after the revolution of 1848 in germany (see marx 1851-52, especially pp. 4-11, 13, 30-31, 37, 39, 65 alternate routes 41, 43, 46-47, 51-52, infra.) . it should be noted here that historian taylor (1945, p. 77) makes an attempt to disclaim class as a motivating factor in liberal activities during this period; however, this disclaimer does not alter either the essential correctness of the marx-engels analysis, or the fact that these liberals, as professionals, were a part of the emerging middle classes. 8. military power is mayer's emphasis, objectively is mine. earlier weber had supported the naval program of secretary of state for the imperial navy, admiral von tirpitz. as mann (1968) points out, weber "surrendered as much to the cult of power as the imperial admiral" and most other germans by urging the development of sea power as an essential part of world politics designed to protect the german economy. weber writes: only complete political dishonesty and naive optimism can fail to recognize that, after a period of peaceful competition, the inevitable urge of all nations with bourgeois societies to expand their trade must now once more lead to a situation in which power alone will have a decisive influence on the extent to which individual nations will share in the economic control of the world, and thus determine the economic prospects of their peoples and of their workers in particular, [see mann 1968, p. 262] 9. for another historian's view concerning the conservative and reactionary policy developed by bismarck, see eyck (1948, especially pp. 15-18). 10. this was the paradoxical irony of the bismarck administration: that in order to protect his own power, bismarck was continually forced to support a policy of unification which moved the nation ever closer to the greater germany he did not desire. 11. biilow's "world policy" had been developing for some years under his predecessors. caprivi, especially, was very active in foreign affairs (see mann 1968, pp. 255-256). for more details on the way in which biilow directed germany's international relations see mann (1968, pp. 265-270, especially pp. 266 and 268). 12. evidently, weber had no small measure of success in training many of his closest friends and relatives to exclude such sentiment. thus, writing his wife-to-be, marianne, weber cautions: "we must not tolerate within us vague and mystical attitudes. if feelings run high, you must tame them, to steer your life soberly" (mayer 1955, p. 37). later, marianne, in a biography of her 66 vop i (.a i i o fa i ucu i uyj husband, would wtite in the third person (speaking of herself as "she" and of her husband and herself as "they") ; in short, "the indestructible barriers against yielding to passions" (even such "passion" as writing in the first person when speaking about oneself), which marianne notes that weber's mother had developed in him, are also readily observable in marianne herself (see green 1974, pp. 119-120). 13. it should be made clear at the outset of this discussion and analysis that i appreciate the breadth, and realize the several lasting contributions of weber's work. accordingly, only a small portion of his work has been scrutinized, focusing in particular on weber's conceptions of objectivity and bureaucracy, in order to show the way in which his writings on scientific method and social organization have made a lasting impact upon present-day sociology. further, the criticism of weber's notion of "objectivity" presented herein is not meant to undermine or destroy the idea that science as logical method can be of value in comparing several arguments, one to another, in order to attempt a determination of the validity of each. the judgment implied in this determination is recognition of the reality that some arguments make a stronger case then others. the stronger arguments constitute better interpretations of the material world because, to borrow a phrase from c. wright mills, they are closer to "the run of fact." this fact is interpreted by human beings who, rather than possessing as individuals two independent selves, are whole persons whose beings are shaped by a value configuration that results from the intersection of historical influences, the milieu of present social structure, and individual biography. it is within this framework that some arguments and analyses can be considered to be more "objective" than others. for elaboration of this conception of objectivity, the relationship between fact and value, see mills (1961, pp. 76-79, 129-131, and 178). 14. this is not to argue that weber was not acting in "good faith" by emphasizing this separation; he was well aware of the abuse of power and privilege that results when prejudice predominates fact as the major determinant of policy decisions. it is to argue that in moving between his separate worlds weber developed a science, the logic of which could do little other than to offer support for prevailing socio-economic arrangements. it is to argue against the view that the development of sociology by weber which supported and/or paralleled capitalist interests is in the main attributable to accident. 15. the attempt by bendix (1962, p. 289) to apologize for weber's inability to adequately relate his analytical abstractions to the material world cannot make weber's fragmented conception of reality whole. 67 alternate routes 16. for further elaboration see weber (1904-05, p. 19 and chapter ii, "the spirit of capitalism," especially pp. 62-69). also, see gerth and mills (1946, "social structures and types of capitalism," pp. 6s-69); and weber (1925, "the principal modes of capitalistic orientation of profit making, " pp. 278-280). 17. a fuller appreciation of the way in which weber's understanding of the close relationship between bureaucracy and capitalism helped to unite them in his sociology may be gained from further examination of his own writings. [see weber (1918) 1968, pp. 1381-1469, especially pp. 1393-1395] 18. weber [(1918) 1968, pp. 1423-1424] gives further and later evidence of his consistency in protecting capitalistic socioeconomic arrangements. for a complete list of weber's several speeches to the verein fur sozialpolitik see mayer (1955, p. 67). 19. see green (1974) for an excellent study showing the ways in which this split between the moral sentiment of ethics and the objectivity of science affected weber's most intimate relationships. when it comes to drawing out the connections between weber's science and his daily round of activities, the green analysis is superior to any i have read. 20. this focus upon leadership has been carried from weber's work into the present-day by those modern sociologists who develop a pluralistic view of the structure of authority. among the pluralists listed by gillam (1971, pp. 191-198), the "veto group" theory of riesman (1950) and the "dispersed inequalities" thesis of dahl (1961) are two of the most well-known arguments traceable to weber's concern with leadership. in contrast, the legacy left by marx with his "ruling class" model of the structure of power is exemplified today in the "power elite"thesis of mills (1956) and the "governing class" argument of domhoff (1967; 1970) . 21. both giddens (1972, pp. 17-19) and mayer (1955, pp. 44, 94-96) provide short, but excellent, reviews of weber's thinking on the relationship between bureaucracy and democracy. for a more lengthy treatment of similar high quality which compares weber's analysis of this relationship to that of v.i. lenin, see wright (1974-75). 22. weber's emphasis upon leadership has been accurately summarized as follows: "it was weber as much as anyone who made imperialism a respectable political cause in germany" (green 1974, p. 155, also see pp. 149-150, 153). 23. weber thought that "of all those powers that lessen the importance of individual action, the most irresistible is rational discipline" (see gerth and mills 1946, p. 253). for weber, it is 68 capitalist ideology clear that even the charismatic leader must, at some point, submit to the dictates of rationality. thus, weber was able to create and practice a science that could routinize the charisma of a bismarck, supporting he and his successors by separating doctrine from the person who advocates it. he attempted to do this in his own life even when the person involved, otto gross, was openly loved by weber's lover, else von richthofen, and lived a style of life disapproved of by weber (see green 1974, especially pp. 56, 129). 24. the term "superman" should be thought of in a generic sense, for its use is not intended to exclude women. superhuman activities are not limited to the male sex alone, as comic book readers and television viewers who follow the super feats of "wonder woman" are well aware. 25. for those readers who are unfamiliar with superman comics, radio and television programs, public phone booths, as well as restrooms were locations often used by clark kent for his transformation from "mild-mannered daily reporter" into superman. 26. it should be pointed out that the material quoted here is only part of a more complete definition which seems to support weber's notion of the ideal type. 69 alternate routes references bendix, reinhard. 1962. max weber: an intellectual portrait . garden city: doubleday. blackburn, robin. 1969. "a brief guide to bourgeois ideology." pp. 37-46 in student power , edited by alexander cockburn and robin blackburn. baltimore: penguin books. cohen, jean. 1972. "max weber and the dynamics of rationalized domination." telos (winter) : 63-86. dahl, robert a. 1961. who governs? democracy and power in an american city . new haven: yale university press. dcmhoff, g. william. 1967. who rules america?. englewood cliffs: prentice-hall. . 1970. the higher circles . new york: random house. engels, friedrich. (1850, 1851-52) 1967. the german revolutions ( the peasant war in germany and germany: revolution and counter-revolut ion) . leonard krieger, ed. chicago: the university of chicago press. (1887-88) 1972. the role of force in history: a study of bismark's policy of blood and iron , translated by jack cohen and edited by ernst kangermann. new york: international publishers. eyck, erich. 1948. bismarck after fifty years . london: george philip 5 son. gerth, hans h., and c. wright mills. 1946. from max weber: essays in sociology . new york: oxford. giddens, anthony. 1972. politics and sociology in the thought of max weber . toronto: macmillan. gillam, richard, ed. 1971. power in postwar america . boston: little, brown and company. green, martin. 1974. the von richthofen sisters: the triumphant and the tragic modes of love . new york: basic books. 70 capitalist ideology hoult, thomas ford. 1974. dictionary of modern sociology . totowa, new jersey: littlefield, adams $ company. loewith, karl. 1970. "weber's interpretation of the bourgeoiscapitalistic world in terms of the guiding principle of •rationalization*." pp. 101-122 in max weber , edited by dennis wrong. englewood cliffs: prentice-hall. mann, golo. 1968. the history of germany since 1789 . new york: frederick a. praeger. marx, karl. (1851-52) 1952. revolution and counter-revolution or germany in 1848 . eleanor marx ave ling, ed. london: george allen and unwin ltd. mayer, j. p. 1955. max weber and german politics . london: faber and faber. mills, c. wright. 1956. the power elite . new york: oxford. . 1961. the sociological imagination . new york: oxford. mitzman, arthur. 1970. the iron cage: an historical interpretation of max weber . new york: grosset 6 dunlap, inc. mueller, gustav emil, tr. 1959. g.w. f.hegel in encyclopedia of philosophy . new york: philosophical library. rheinstein, max, ed. (edward shils and m. rheinstein, trans.). 1954. max weber on law in economy and society . cambridge: harvard university press. riesman, david. 1950. the lonely crowd . new haven: yale university press. roth, guenther. 1963. the social democrats in imperial germany: a study in working-class isolation and national integration . totowa, new jersey: bedminster press. shuster, george n., and arnold bergstraesser. 1944. germany: a short history . new york: w.w. norton. smith, dusky lee. 1965. "sociology and the rise of corporate capitalism." science and society 29: 401-418. . 1970. some socio-economic influences upon the founding fathers o f sociology in the united states (unpublished ph.d. dissertation) . buffalo: state university of new york. 71 alternate routes taylor, a. j. p. 1945. the course of german history: a survey of the development of germany since 1815 . london: hamish hamilton. . 1955. bismarck: the man and the statesman . new york: alfred a. knopf. weber, max. (1904) 1949. '** objectivity' in social science and social policy." pp. 49-112 in the methodology of the social sciences , translated and edited by edward a. shils and henry a. finch. new york: the free press. . (1904-05) 1958. the protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism , translated by talcott parsons. new york: charles scribner's sons. . (1909) 1955. "max weber on bureaucratization in 1909." pp. 125-131 in max weber and german politics , j. p. mayer. london: faber and faber. . (1918) 1968. "parliament and government in a reconstructed germany." pp. 1381-1469 in economy and society , edited by guenther ross and claus wittich. new york: bedminster. (1919) 1946. "politics as a vocation." pp. 77-128 in from max weber , translated, edited and introduced by gerth and mills. new york: oxford. . (1925) 1947. the theory of social and economic organization , talcott parsons, ed.(a.m. henderson and t. parsons, trans.). new york: oxford. williams, william a. 1966. the contours of american history . chicago: quadrangle books. wright, erik olin. 1974-75. "to control or to smash bureaucracy: weber and lenin on politics, the state, and bureaucracy." berkeley journal of sociology 19: 69-108. 72 climate change and crisis | 215 climate change and crisis: in dialogue with simon dalby — jen wyre jen wrye1 (jw): since the economic collapse, spending on environmental programs has decreased around the globe. can you comment on the similarities and differences in such reductions between canada and the u.s. or eurozone? simon dalby2 (sd): in general environmental programs may have suffered but clearly european states remain much more concerned about environmental matters than at least the federal governments in both the u.s., given republican agendas, and canada, given the conservatives’ agenda. however, that said, other jurisdictions do have a very varied response. california’s climate change agenda is completely different from washington’s even if austerity is the order of the day there. if you count in such things as obama’s green jobs initiatives then things look rather different in the u.s.. europeans, and even ontario in the canadian federation, are working on initiatives that, while not traditional environmental regulations, are nonetheless important in terms of the larger climate change issue in particular. jw: how ideologically driven are cuts to environmental spending, canada’s abandonment of kyoto commitments, etc.? are the circumstances 1 jen wrye recently completed her ph.d. at the department of sociology and anthropology, carleton university. she now teaches in the humanities and social sciences department at north island college in courtenay, british columbia. 2 simon dalby holds the cigi chair in the political economy of climate change, and is professor of geography and environmental studies at wilfrid laurier university. his published research deals with climate change, political ecology, geopolitics, global security, environmental change, militarization and the spatial dimensions of governance. he is co-editor of rethinking geopolitics, the geopolitics reader, the journal geopolitics, and author of creating the second cold war, environmental security, and security and environmental change. 216 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism a reflection of the conservative government mainly or do you see these tendencies as part of broader transnational and neoliberal restructuring? sd: the canadian conservative government is particularly clear that its agenda is ideologically driven. yes, there is a certain structural dimension in the canadian political economy as resource extraction is a key part of the national economy. canada is also home, through both the toronto and vancouver stock exchanges, to many of the largest international mining companies. some of these companies are more concerned about their environmental records than the conservatives apparently are, and indeed if environmental standards are abandoned in canada, exporting may actually get more complicated given international standards on many things such things as food safety standards. abandoning kyoto is clearly ideologically driven, but in line with the anti-multilateralism of the conservatives, expressed in foreign minister john baird’s formulations of enlightened sovereignty quite as much as its anti-environmental agenda. in the so called stimulus package the federal government could have chosen to push hard on renewable energies, sensible public transit initiatives in canadian cities and other projects, and fund these by removing subsidies to the petroleum sector, but they ignored these opportunities to shift investment to build green projects. instead canada is portrayed as an energy superpower given its tar sands, although how much of this oil will make its way to international markets remains unclear given the difficulties with various pipeline projects. jw: can you highlight some of the environmental consequences to austerity we might expect in canada? for example, which communities might be impacted most? sd: if austerity is about reducing environmental reviews of numerous proposed mines, pipeline and other resource extraction “developments” then clearly communities close to such developments obviously are most likely to have to deal directly with the disruption of developments and subsequent habitat disruption and pollution issues. in terms of forgone green building initiatives and modernization of infrastructure then the effects are likely to be widespread. the big unknown in the next few years is of course how much of the reduction of federal activity will be taken up by the provinces. that depends on provincial politics in complicated ways. but clearly the gutting of federal environmental science programs and environmental reviews isn’t about austerity; that at least climate change and crisis | 217 is clearly an ideologically driven agenda to silence the production of information that might challenge the priority of promoting the resource extraction sector as the key to canadian prosperity. jw: there seem to be conflict between an austerity agenda that diminishes environmental spending on one hand, and the need, as the frequency and scale of environmental catastrophes increases, to prioritize the environment politically on the other. what types of responses might we anticipate to these events if state spending is retracting? sd: gradually it is dawning on policy makers in municipalities and provinces that the federal government can’t be relied on to help in ways that it used to. pretending that companies and contractors can step in to deal with floods or oil spills in the absence of resources and coordination from the federal government is a very dangerous way to conduct public policy. the neoliberal ideology that markets can provide and that government should have no role in many aspects of public life leads to the reduction of facilities and capabilities in ways that may imperil people in coming years. can municipalities and provinces agree to pool resources to compensate for the withdrawal of federal support? that remains to be seen, but as all the predictions of climate change make clear, extreme events are becoming more frequent. but some of the most important things that need to be done to prepare for what is coming are simple practical matters of sensible land use planning and building resilient emergency systems and infrastructure. if short-term market priorities continue to be the priority the prognosis isn’t good, especially if self-regulation in the construction sector leads to shoddy construction and bad planning decisions. marketizing risk in terms of catastrophe bonds, and relying on insurance for many things is logical if markets and adaptation are the policy priority. this leaves those without financial resources especially vulnerable when government programs are withdrawn. jw: the united nations anticipates that austerity will reduce environmental spending by up to $50 billion in the foreseeable future. what do you think this will mean for global human security, particularly in the global south? sd: this issue has to be handled very carefully given that some of the projects, such as community forestry projects funded by various 218 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism international development schemes, are dubious both in terms of their environmental and local community impacts. forestry plantations that are claimed to be carbon sinks are not always helpful to local communities and indeed one might argue that canceling some of these might actually be beneficial in many parts of the south. if the cuts affect urban infrastructure, flood prevention measures and such things then the security of many poor people are further imperiled. jw: how do you think ideas about a ‘depressed’ economy and austerity affect people’s opinions about environmental problems? does austerity shift public attention from environmental degradation and sustainability? for example, do we stop thinking in terms of reducing our dependency on non-renewable resources, curbing resource use, or funding green initiatives and more in terms of maintaining our current lifestyle as is? sd: constraints often have perverse consequences for the environment; reduced economic activity frequently reduces pollution and resource use. it may also prevent modernization projects that use cleaner technologies, meaning that old polluting technologies are used longer than might otherwise be the case. traditionally hard times have meant environmental matters slip down the list of political priorities; environment being seen as a matter of a luxury for affluent times. but the relationships are never that simple; and efficiency responses often reduce resource consumption and hence pollution. jw: which strategies might you expect to be most successful in resisting cuts to environmental investments? sd: in the canadian context electing tom mulcair as prime minister might seem to be the most obvious strategy! but clearly some of the ecological modernization arguments are important. efficiency matters in things like heating bills and electricity consumption for schools, hospitals and numerous parts of the public sector. conservation in such matters helps in dealing with controlling costs in all aspects of economic activity. what seems to be happening across the globe is that numerous institutions are starting to think much more carefully about their fuel use in terms of travel budgets and the running costs of factories, housing and numerous other things. here in fact neo-liberal mantras about efficiency do make environmental sense. but austerity will no doubt affect new innovative investments that might be cleaner alternatives to existing systems. climate change and crisis | 219 the key to all this remains the ability of the political left to articulate a clear vision of a more just future that is also one that uses less resources than the production systems of the past. in times of austerity unions are often politically boxed into fighting to protect existing jobs, even in “dirty” industries rather than trying to articulate a larger agenda of green jobs and public investments. this is what many green parties have tried to promote, but often ended up too close to the market ideologies of neo-liberalism, and too focused on the narrow technicalities of environment to produce a convincing alternative narrative that can challenge the ideologies of neoliberalism combined by the re-articulation of citizenship in terms of consumption and “life-style”. challenging this discourse of “entitlement” remains a key ideological task for those who think that a more just and less destructive mode of political economy is both necessary and possible. 300 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times book review the politics of genocide by edward s. herman and david peterson. new york: monthly review press, 2010. $12.95; paper. isbn: 978-1-58367-212-9. pages: 159. reviewed by: matthew nelson1 while genocide commonly refers to the killing or attempted killing of an entire ethnic group or people, its definition is highly controversial and the subject of extensive debate. the term is often used to describe diverse forms of direct or indirect killing, which has resulted in its “frequency of use and recklessness of application” over the past several decades (103). in the politics of genocide, herman and peterson argue that while members of the western establishment and news media have rushed to denounce bloodbaths in bosnia-herzegovina, rwanda, kosovo, and darfur, they have largely remained silent over war crimes and mass atrocities committed by allied regimes in southeast asia, central america, the middle east, and sub-saharan africa. as noam chomsky suggests in the foreword to the book, since the end of the cold war, we have witnessed the emergence of an era of virtual “holocaust denial” or “genocide denial with a vengeance” (7-9). in substantiating their argument, herman and peterson draw on years of meticulous research, careful documentation and in-depth, empirical analysis of atrocities and bloodbaths around the world. the authors have done an excellent job at exposing the double standards of the us news media and its hypocritical system of propaganda. in this sense, the politics of genocide offers a needed corrective to those who manipulate and abuse the genocide label for the purposes of promoting the expansion of imperial power interests around the globe. similar to herman’s past work, however, the book offers less in the way of a theoretical addition to debates surrounding the nature of genocide and imperialism, instead providing a series of well-documented case studies. like the five ‘filters’ in herman and chomsky’s manufacturing consent, the phenomenon of genocide is simply classified through four categories—in this case, of bloodbaths. moreover, while herman and 1  matthew nelson is a ph.d. candidate at the department of political science, carleton university (ottawa, canada). book review: the politics of genocide | 301 peterson, like chomsky, do perceive imperialism fundamentally in race and class terms, their use of terms such as ‘elite’ and western ‘establishment’ rather than class or ruling class tends to obscure the real material links between genocide, capitalism and western imperialism. for herman and peterson, “a remarkable degree of continuity stretches across the many decades of bribes and threats, economic sanctions, subversion, terrorism, aggression, and occupation ordered-up by the policymaking elite of the united states” (13). after the us emerged from the second world war in a dominant economic, political and military position, it had to confront numerous nationalist upheavals in former colonial areas by peoples seeking “independence, self-determination and better lives” (14). to counter these increasingly popular demands for improvement in living standards, the us supported a series of dictatorships in countries like indonesia, south vietnam and chile. although these “national security” states were “torture-prone” and “deeply undemocratic,” they helped improve the overall climate of capitalist investment by keeping their majorities fearful and atomized (14). when local dictators failed, direct us military intervention often followed, as illustrated in the cases of vietnam, and more recently, in iraq and afghanistan. the authors draw on the framework for analyzing mass killings provided by chomsky, and herman himself in their counter-revolutionary violence: bloodbaths in fact and propaganda (crv), first published in 1973. in this work, herman and chomsky conclude that it is obvious and demonstrable that us officials, with the help of the established media, would engage in “atrocities management,” by producing incessant propaganda to deflect attention away from us-approved violence, and onto its enemies. in its framework of analysis, crv provided four categories of bloodbaths: “constructive,” “benign,” “nefarious,” and “mythical” (a sub-category under nefarious). as herman and peterson explain, “[t]hose bloodbaths carried out by the united states itself or that serve immediate and major us interests are constructive; those carried out by allies or clients are benign; and those carried out by us target states are nefarious and (sometimes) mythical” (16). in essence, instances of mass violence are evaluated differently by the us political establishment and media depending on who is responsible for carrying them out. the authors apply this analytical framework in their current work by subsuming more recent bloodbaths under the four categories, which they argue are “eerily applicable to the present”, and “apply now with the same political bias and rigor” (17-19). using empirical measures such as the coverage of key events in the media, what the authors offer the 302 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times reader is more or less a classificatory schema or conceptual model for understanding bloodbaths rather than a specific interjection into theoretical debates surrounding critical accounts of genocide, imperialism and international law. today’s leading ‘experts’ on genocide and mass atrocities, including many journalists, academics, legal scholars and policymakers, are often careful to exclude from consideration the vietnam war, the 1965-1966 indonesian massacres, and the invasion and occupation of east timor by indonesia in 1975, the latter of which resulted in the deaths of somewhere between 100,000 and 200,000 civilians (although this is a hugely debatable claim) (18). the vietnam war, and the massive “sanctions of mass destruction” directed at iraq during the 1990s, are examples of constructive atrocities, where the victims of war crimes are deemed unworthy of our attention. however, when the perpetrators of genocide are considered enemies of the west, the atrocities are nefarious and their victims are seen to be worthy of our focus and sympathy. examples of nefarious atrocities include: cambodia under the khmer rouge, iraq under saddam hussein, halabja, bosnia, rwanda, kosovo and darfur. when systematic violence is carried out by us clients—such as indonesia in east timor from 1975-1999, israel in the gaza strip and west bank from 1967 to the present, or rwanda and uganda in congo—they are viewed by the us political establishment as benign and not worthy of condemnation. the final category, mythical, results from the inflation of numbers or invention of incidents by the us government, media sources and ngos to implement pre-planned interventions such as sanctions, embargoes and the funding of various ‘color revolutions.’ the politics of genocide has done much to emphasize the biases and contradictions of us foreign policy, but it should be read in conjunction with other theoretical contributions to themes related to genocide, imperialism and international law. first, while herman and peterson recognize that the history of ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity demonstrates “the centrality of racism to the imperial project” (22), there is little discussion of why advanced capitalist powers and oppressed nations are, in the first place, not equal partners in shaping the world. due in part to their use of terms such as ‘elite’ and western ‘establishment’ rather than class, their analysis should be complimented by recent work that is more explicit in highlighting the centrality of racism to issues of class, capitalism and imperialism in the international system. while not directly touching on the topic of genocide, marxist theorists writing on current modes of imperialism such as leo panitch and book review: the politics of genocide | 303 sam gindin (global capitalism and american empire, 2004) and david harvey (the new imperialism, 2003) emphasize the extent to which current modes of imperialism continue to exacerbate racial as well as global class inequalities. identifying the class basis of the new imperialism would help identify some of the underlying reasons for why media coverage of genocides in the west is often silent with respect to crimes committed by the various client regimes of advanced capitalist states. second, herman and peterson are highly critical of the “selective investigation” and “selective impunity” of the international criminal court (icc) in prosecuting alleged perpetrators of genocide, especially, in the contemporary age of ‘responsibility to protect,’ the exclusion from its jurisdiction of the international crime of aggression, judged at nuremburg to be the “supreme international crime” (21). however, on this theme, the authors seem to imply that the responsibility to protect doctrine and the very notion of human rights are to be located outside of contemporary imperialism. in this sense, they are often ambiguous on whether they seek to defend a position of legal neutrality, holding out hope for the reformed international law and institutions, which marxist theorist of international law china miéville has recently argued in between equal rights (2006), are completely incapable of adequately resisting imperialism. not only does legal equality, in this sense, mask actually existing inequality, the appeal to international law tends to undermine the most effective avenue for advancing necessary political resistance against the new imperialism—building solidarity as widely as possible through social movements centered not only on antiracism, but also on class struggle. 304 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times 978-1-926958-01-9 163 book review cops, crime and capitalism: the law and order agenda in canada by todd gordon. halifax: fernwood publishing, 2006. $21.95 can, paper. isbn 1-55266-185-7. pages 1-171. reviewer: gulden ozcan1 debates around the notions of security, police, the state and the dissent have accelerated in the aftermath of the g8/20 summit in toronto. on the face of these debates, revisiting one of the ambitious contributions to the critical literature on police in canada is important. todd gordon’s cops, crime and capitalism: the law and order agenda in canada provides two primary insights that can be utilized in current discussions. first, gordon situates his analysis of the broader police project in the context of massive restructuring of social relations after each crisis of capitalism. thus, the increasing adoption of the ‘law-and-order policies’ by the canadian state since the 1990s is depicted in relation to the neoliberal restructuring of social relations after the downfall of keynesian policies. second, gordon’s focus on racialised and gendered aspects of policing in canada opens up the possibility for new approaches to locate this long-delayed discussion at the very centre of the materialist analysis of state power, capital and labour relations. gordon, by conducting a careful empirical study of legal regulations, demonstrates how police practices have served the systematic subordination of racialised and gendered populations in canada. the theoretical stance gordon employs in the book is informed by open marxism and the concepts developed by mark neocleous, one of the leading figures in critical police/security studies. the open marxism approach provides him with theoretical tools in defining the state as the political form of the class antagonism between labour and capital. even though the organization of social relations are 1 gulden ozcan is a phd student in the department of sociology & anthropology at carleton university. she can be reached at gozcan@connect.carleton.ca cops, crime and capitalism: the law and order agenda in canada 164 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research operated by the state and its apparatuses, gordon argues these operations originate from the struggles between labour and capital. gordon draws on neocleous’s historical analysis of the broader police project in relation to the rise of capitalism as well as his conceptualizations of the “political administration” and the “fabrication of social order”. paralleling neocleous, gordon defines policing as a form of “political administration” that has historically played an important role in the “fabrication of social order” (pp. 38-50). i shall also acknowledge a third theoretical stance gordon uses, that is, his critical attitude towards “marxist-oriented functionalism” and foucauldian “panoptical theories”. although he mentions the former very briefly only in the introduction, he spends a great deal of the first chapter on the latter. it is, therefore, important to mention gordon’s critique of what he calls “panoptical theories”, i.e., theories that take “governing at a distance” approach as their starting point. gordon pinpoints a “gap between the reality of contemporary policing and its portrayal” in this literature (p. 7). he identifies three main assumptions of panoptic theories: (1) policing is done electronically at-a-distance; (2) electronic policing is exercised equally on everybody regardless of class, race and gender differences; (3) electronic policing reinforces the emergence of more local and autonomous forms of policing (pp. 7-8). gordon’s position toward these assumptions unfolds in the question of “at a distance or in your face?” (p. 13). he basically argues that the new tactics of policing does not change the historical objective of police forces, i.e., targeting working-class, racialised and gendered populations through ever-ascending centralized and intense state power (pp. 8-27). drawing attention to the problematic aspects of panoptic theories strengthens gordon’s approach to police as a state-centred strategy. although his criticisms of the panoptical and at-a-distance approaches are persuasive, his equation of foucault with foucauldians is not. it is obvious that foucault’s work has generated a basis for both panoptical theories and governing at a distance approach. however, some aspects of these approaches contradict foucault’s own writings. gordon does not distinguish foucault from the foucauldians and thus presents a reductionist attitude towards foucault’s contribution to the literature on police. his miscomprehension of foucault’s oeuvre results in a few literally wrong assumptions such as the naming of ‘at a distance approach’ after foucault—which was originally suggested by p. miller and n. rose in 19922—, the rejection of foucault’s meticulous attention to material social relations, the denial of foucault’s understanding of police as a state-centric initiative at its birth, and his attack of foucault’s notion of “docile bodies” on the basis of the absence of agency. nevertheless, this confusion neither 2 rose, n. and miller, p. 1992 “political power beyond the state: problematics of government”, british journal of sociology 43(2): 173-205. 165cops, crime and capitalism: the law and order agenda in canada diminishes the strong basis of the arguments in the book, nor contributes anything to it. following the theoretical debate in the second chapter, gordon draws on the history of police in the making of the capitalist social order from the nineteenth century onwards. gordon defines this historical role of police as such: police power has been mobilized [by the ruling classes] to criminalize a series of street-based activities that either provide people with an opportunity to survive outside market relations or serve as distractions from waged work. in the process, policing has worked to constitute a class of labourers dependent on the wage for subsistence and thereby a bourgeois order rooted in the authority of private property and the subordination of working people to the imperatives of capital accumulation (p. 50). in what follows, he compares and contrasts nineteenth-century police practices with more current police practices and thus illustrates the continuous dynamic that lies at the very raison d’etre of the police project, i.e., targeting labour power to build a more orderly, disciplined, regulated and supervised society in accord with the changing needs of capitalism. the third chapter provides a brief history of the neoliberal transition from keynesianism in advanced capitalist countries, with specific attention to canada. in order to respond to the growing structural imbalances in the economy, gordon explains that labour costs have been reduced significantly since the 1960s through increasing the number of non-standard, non-unionized, and unqualified types of labour as a state policy. this of course was not a pain-free process. although the initial attempt of consecutive governments was to have policies of “austerity by consent”, gordon argues this did not work due to the disruptive power of labour at the time. as a result, the coercive power of the state has been increased and lawand-order policies increasingly adopted (pp. 54-57). the fourth chapter portrays that new regulations introduced with the lawand-order policies that target not so much the poor, but the contemporary indigent that seek to live outside the labour market. in this sense, gordon examines the vagrancy act of 1869 and shows that following the economic crisis of the 1970s, vagrancy status did not come back to the criminal code; however, substitutes have taken their place in an attempt to serve the same objective. this is evidenced, for example, in provincial legislation and municipal by-laws such as the safe streets acts, panhandling by-laws, and the adoption of targeting and intelligence policing strategies (pp. 82-85). accompanying this new work ethic has been a re-regulation of social assistance programs. gordon reveals that people in need of social assistance 166 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research due to unemployment are encouraged to gain and/or improve their “transferable skills” (p. 105). these skills are defined as self-discipline, getting to work on time, meeting the expectations of the employer and being motivated to work. in the last chapter of the book gordon problematizes how policing as “an administrative feature of state power” takes on a certain position when it comes to immigrant communities (p. 128). unlike some marxist approaches to immigration, gordon does not limit his account to portraying immigrants only as a source of cheap foreign labour. although the initial emphasis is put on the role of immigrant labour in filling the worst jobs canada has to offer, gordon does not ignore other circumstances surrounding immigrants. he especially takes issue with the conditions of women and non-white immigrants. for instance, he demonstrates how the points system used in immigration applications neglects the unpaid domestic labour of women and makes them rely on their husband in the application process (p. 115). moreover, he establishes the link between the exploitative immigration policies of the federal government and the cheap labour requirements of capital by drawing attention to the non-immigrant employment authorization program (nieap), live-in caregiver program, as well as the government’s blindness to nonstatus immigrants’ participation in the labour process. gordon also speaks to the fact that the criminalization of certain drugs are strongly related to canada’s immigration policies. he claims, for example, that the prohibition of opium in 1908 was a direct response to chinese immigration. the ruling class was concerned that opium shows “signs of non-conformity with “canadian” order, and that this vice of bodily pleasure might infiltrate the ranks of the white working class” (p. 130). the same applies to the prohibition of cocaine in 1911, cannabis in 1923 and khat in 1997, however this time as a response to black, mexican and somalian immigrants, with the explicit aim being to produce public order on the streets (p. 135). all in all, gordon’s book provides a significant overview of policing in canada. it has much to contribute to the current debates on the role of police in the current reformation of the neoliberal order. although gordon’s approach to police as a state-centred strategy leaves some questions unanswered such as the ever-increasing numbers of private police, he provides an accessible account to remind us that policing is a strategy driven by a moral discourse on the importance of employment and self-discipline, rather than a strategy to fight crime. whole book pdf 264 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism book review the devil’s milk: a social history of rubber, by john tully. new york, ny: monthly review press, 2011. $24.95 us. isbn: 987-1-58367-231-0. pages: 1-480. reviewed by james braun1 drawing upon marx’s famous formulation of commodity fetishism, john tully seeks to uncover “the whole buried world of social and ecological relations” that have historically constituted the production of rubber and its derivative products (p.359). rubber, tully argues, is an indispensable commodity for the industrial age, facilitating revolutions in transportation, sexuality and communications (p.41-45). its myriad industrial applications and unique properties meant that government and industry were prepared to go to great lengths to secure a reliable supply, abusing workers and ecologies in their wake. from the amazon rubber boom to the rise of synthetic rubber production in world war 2, tully documents the history of rubber production and processing “inextricably bound up with the rise of capitalism, imperialism and modernity” (p.345). although tully presents his book as “a social history of rubber,” his methodology focuses narrowly on labour history. from the subtitle, one might expect a comprehensive investigation of how rubber transformed everyday life from the viewpoint of “ordinary” people. the book hints at interesting directions such a history might proceed, but only ever briefly engages with them. the development of the rubber condom and its associated controversies suggests transformations in sexual and religious politics (p.44-45). likewise, the pneumatic tire had crucial implications for the ascendancy of truck transport over rails, but the political and social contests that facilitated this change are glossed over (p.139-40). the subjects of tully’s history are primarily workers, and their lives away from the worksite are not given much consideration. most of the book documents in detail the brutal labour practices that characterized (and continue to characterize) the rubber industry. wild rubber tapping in the amazon and the congo, driven by extortion and 1 james braun is an m.a. candidate at the institute of political economy, carleton university. he can be reached at jbraun@connect.carleton.ca. book review: the devil's milk | 265 sadism, was supplanted by hevea plantations and indentured labour in malaya, liberia and indochina, and ultimately synthetic production in world war 2 after japan captured most of the world’s natural rubber supply. his study of rubber production and processing begins with the early industrial revolution in britain, but is primarily focused on the birth and growth of the pneumatic tire industry in akron, ohio. despite rubber’s many applications, this is a reasonable limit on scope; as tully notes, by the end of world war 1, akron tire plants processed roughly forty percent of the world’s supply of raw rubber (p.138). his discussion of worker resistance is somewhat uneven. resistance tactics in akron, indochina and auschwitz are discussed at length, whereas one is left with the unlikely impression that indigenous workers in the congo and the amazon hardly fought against their oppression. the methodological challenges of writing history from the perspective of rubber tappers or plantation labourers are obvious; nevertheless, a social history should seek to highlight the agency of its subjects and to make visible the world as they understood it, not to merely paint them as the passive victims of forces from above. tully makes good use of tran tu binh’s memoir, a seminary-educated communist organizer who worked as a coolie “in order to carry out communist agitation among the michelin estate laborers” in indochina, but such first-hand accounts are exceedingly rare (p.239-40). innovative readings of other types of sources would shed a much-needed light on these hidden histories, a task crucial to tully’s project. among tully’s admirable achievements is to bridge the histories of colonial rubber extraction and metropolitan rubber processing. imperialism is a key theme of his work; at each stage in the rubber industry’s development, political and economic power intertwines transnationally to secure the rubber supply so vital to industrial modernity. among the more notable examples: british capital and peruvian desperation to assert sovereignty in the putomayo valley facilitated julio césar arana’s murderous rubber fiefdom (p.90-100). leopold ii of belgium’s instincts for political aggrandizement and financial enrichment coincide in his reign of terror in the congo (p.102-103). strikebreaking tactics developed by firestone in akron are used against plantation workers in malaya (p.273). ig farben’s collusion with the third reich creates legal complications for us efforts to develop synthetic rubber during the second world war, via farben’s agreements with standard oil (p.322-323). throughout this history, capital operates both as a productive and constraining force, both feeding the ravenous resource appetites of metropolitan industry and frustrating the efforts of those who would put a more “human face” on the labour processes involved. 266 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism given the importance of the colonized world in this book, there is space in his analysis to interrogate the coloniality of processes that brought rise to the rubber industry. the narrative he sketches in chapter one, of rubber as a mesoamerican article of ritual and curiosity transformed by european science and rationalism into a utilitarian commodity for industry, should be familiar to post-colonialists and other critics of modernity. the foundations of this rationalism have been thoroughly dissected, but tully does not engage with those critiques. rubber fetishism is described briefly as a cultural aberration on rubber’s march to utilitarian respectability, but could be used as an avenue to explore ongoing affective relationships to rubber (p.45-46). implicit in tully’s discussion of worker resistance in malaya is an acceptance of a normative, eurocentric conceptualization of economic organization. tully describes how trade unions and strikes emerged from “primitive protests” such as assaults on overseers and desertion, but he misses how this tactical evolution normalizes the relations of the capitalist wage economy imposed by european imperialism (p.260-270). in some respects, tully has done for rubber much of what sidney mintz did for sugar. in highlighting “the social character of the commodity of rubber,” (p.20) he demonstrates the crucial and brutal relationship between the metropolis and periphery that produces industrial capitalism. in other words, metropolitan machinery would not run without a steady stream of peripheral resources. great recession-proof? shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism 2013 alternate routes edited by: carlo fanelli & bryan evans g reat r ecessio n-pro o f? carlo fanelli & b ryan evans great recession-proof? shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism 2013 alternate routes edited by: carlo fanelli & bryan evans g reat r ecessio n-pro o f? carlo fanelli & b ryan evans great recession-proof? shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism 2013 alternate routes edited by: carlo fanelli & bryan evans g reat r ecessio n-pro o f? carlo fanelli & b ryan evans © red quill books ltd. 2013 ottawa www.redquillbooks.com isbn 978-1-926958-24-8 printed on acid-free paper. the paper used in this book incorporates post-consumer waste and has not been sourced from endangered old growth forests, forests of exceptional conservation value or the amazon basin. red quill books subscribes to a one-book-at-a-time manufacturing process that substantially lessens supply chain waste, reduces greenhouse emissions, and conserves valuable natural resources. includes bibliographical references. isbn 978-1-926958-24-8 also published as a serial: “alternate routes” issn 1923-7081 (online) issn 0702-8865 (print) red quill books is an alternative publishing house. proceeds from the sale of this book will support future critical scholarship. alternate routes: a journal of critical social research volume 24, 2013 editors: carlo fanelli and bryan evans book review editors: priscillia lefebvre and nicolas carrier editorial board: nahla abdo, pat armstrong, david camfield, nicolas carrier, wallace clement, simten cosar, simon dalby, aaron doyle, ann duffy, bryan mitchell evans, luis fernandez, randall germain, peter gose, alan hunt, paul kellogg, jacqueline kennelly, mark neocleous, mi park, georgios papanicolaou, justin paulson, garry potter, stephanie ross, herman rosenfeld, george s. rigakos, heidi rimke, arne christoph ruckert, alan sears, mitu sengupta, donald swartz, ingo schmidt, toby sanger, janet lee siltanen, susan jane spronk, mark p. thomas, rosemary warskett. journal mandate established in 1977 at the department of sociology and anthropology, carleton university, alternate routes’ central mandate has been to create outlets for critical social research and interdisciplinary inquiry. a scholarly peer-reviewed annual, ar works closely with labour and social justice activists to promote the publication of non-traditional, provocative and radical analyses that may not find a forum in conventional academic venues. ar seeks to be a public academic journal and encourages submissions that advance or challenge theoretical, historical and contemporary socio-political, economic and cultural issues. in addition to full-length articles, we welcome review essays sparked by previously published material, interviews, short commentaries, as well as poetry, drawings and photos. ar publishes primarily special-themed issues and therefore requests that submissions be related to the current call for papers. submissions must be free of racist and sexist language, have limited technical or specialized terms and be written in a style that is accessible to our diverse readership. 4 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism table of contents | 5 table of contents introduction from great recession to great deception: reimagining the roots of the crisis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 —carlo fanelli and bryan evans articles 1. the myth of canadian exceptionalism: crisis, non-recovery, and austerity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 —jim stanford 2. crisis and opportunism: public finance trends from stimulus to austerity in canada . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 —christopher stoney and tamara krawchenko 3. canada’s conservative class war: using austerity to squeeze labour at the expense of economic growth. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59 —toby sanger 4. stabilizing privatization: crisis, enabling fields, and public-private partnerships in canada. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85 —heather whiteside 5. when resistance isn’t futile: understanding canadian labour’s fight for decent pensions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109 —joel davidson harden 6. what is trade union bureaucracy? a theoretical account . . . 133 —david camfield interventions 1. social property relations in the 21st century: an interview with ellen meiksins wood . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 159 —jordy cummings 2. twenty-first century socialism and the global financial meltdown: in conversation with michael lebowitz . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 171 —rebekah wetmore and ryan romard 3. neoliberalization and the matrix of action: in conversation with neil brenner, jamie peck, and nik theodore . . . . . . . . . 183 —peter brogan 6 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism 4. austerity is bad for our health: gender and distributional impacts of ontario’s 2012 budget . . . . . . . . . . . 199 —shelia block 5. austerity and aboriginal communities: an interview with david newhouse . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 207 —carlo fanelli 6. climate change and crisis: in dialogue with simon dalby . . . 215 —jen wrye 7. the electro-motive lockout and non-occupation: what did we lose? what can we learn? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 220 —herman rosenfeld 8. beyond the economic crisis: this crisis in trade unionism. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 236 —sam gindin reviews 1. christine pich —whitmore, elizabeth, et al. “activism that works.”. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 248 2. natalie spagnuolo —engler, yves. “canada and israel: building apartheid”. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 252 3. jillian l. curtin —toussaint, eric and damien millet. “debt, the imf and the world bank: sixty questions, sixty answers. . . 255 4. kevin partridge —hill, gord. “500 years of indigenous resistance.” . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 258 5. tiffany hall —frölich, paul. “rosa luxemburg: ideas in action.” 261 6. james braun —tully, john. “the devil’s milk: a social history of rubber.” . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 264 7. rebekah wetmore —brouwer, steve. “revolutionary doctors: how venezuela and cuba and changing the world’s conception of health care.” . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 267 8. naomi alisa calnitsky —cockcroft, james. “mexico’s revolution then and now.” . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 270 9. rania tfaily —ruben, albert. “the people’s lawyer.” . . . . . . . . . . 273 10. sabrina fernandes —dwyer, augusta. “broke but unbroken: grassroots social movements and their radical solutions to poverty.” . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 276 editorial introduction from great recession to great deception: reimagining the roots of the crisis —carlo fanelli and bryan evans on march 23, 2012, alternate routes in conjunction with carleton university and ryerson university’s centre for labour-management relations hosted the conference: the global economic crisis and canada: perception versus reality. the original call for papers which inspired the event and later this issue, stated: “it is now broadly recognized that the global economic crisis that struck in late 2007 is by far the most significant and wide-ranging since the depression years of the 1930s. while there have been signs of tepid recovery over the last five years, the international monetary fund (2011, p.xv) has recently warned that “[t]he global economy is in a dangerous new phase. global activity has weakened and become more uneven, confidence has fallen sharply recently, and downside risks are growing...thus, the structural problems facing recessionhit economies have proven more intractable than expected, and the process of devising and implementing reforms more complicated.” given fears of an ongoing recession, particularly as a result of europe’s sovereign debt crisis and a record level u.s. budget deficit, the global recession that struck in 2007 is by no means over. “in canada, however, the economic downturn has been shorter and milder than many of its g7 counterparts. in fact, according to statistics canada, while the canadian economy began contracting in the fourth quarter of 2008 by the third quarter of 2009 the recession had already passed. indeed, the great recession is allegedly no greater than previous slumps such as those in the early 1980s and 1990s as measured by job losses, home sales, bankruptcies, credit availability and consumer spending (cross, 2011). but numbers rarely, if ever, tell the whole story. federal, provincial and local governments across the country, regardless of political stripes, are turning to a range of austerity measures that will erode public services and the quality of public sector employment. it is also being demanded that private sector workers take pay and benefit cuts.” 8 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism despite official pronouncements suggesting a recovery is well underway, the articles and interviews collected here problematize prevailing characterizations of recession and recovery. rather than focusing on narrowly economistic measures, contributors challenge standard explanations of the great recession drawing attention to the multifaceted socio-political, ethno-racial and gendered dimensions of austerity and retrenchment. furthermore, instead of glossing over or ignoring the capitalist context that leaves workers dependent on the imperatives of capital, the analyses collected here take seriously the inherently antagonistic class relations that structure our daily lives. the challenge, as we saw it, was to bring together contributors who considered the uneven and often contradictory impacts of recession that stretch across the canadian political economic landscape. we are confident that the voices presented in this edition of ar have made a serious contribution to that objective. as the 2008 global economic slump made its way to canada, the initial response by the federal conservatives to a deteriorating economic climate was one of confusion and denial. in the midst of the 2008 general election p.m. harper suggested that there were some great buying opportunities in the stock market, while his finance minister, jim flaherty, insisted that canada would not run a deficit. six months later the deficit was estimated to be roughly $50 billion (laxer, 2009). despite dubious financial advice and eyebrow-raising budgetary forecasting, the conservatives have since gone on to win a majority government in 2011. like their counterparts across the provinces, most notably in ontario, alberta, and nova scotia —each province having elected a different political party —austerity and attacks against public services and unionized workers has been established as the orthodox policy response. needless to say, the shape taken by struggles over austerity and the protection of public services may well determine whether (neoliberal) capitalism continues uninterrupted or, alternatively, whether something new and historically unique can capture the public’s imagination. before introducing the articles presented here, however, we found it necessary to bring attention to what we are calling the great deception. it is plain to see that the assault on trade union rights and freedoms, the public provision of social services and working class standards of living are currently under attack and will remain so indefinitely.1 while austerity has been the buzzword of the last five years, when considered in historical perspective it is clear that 1 parts of this section are drawn from fanelli, 2012 editorial introduction from great recession to great deception | 9 canadians have been living with varying degrees of austerity for at least the last three decades (mcbride and shields, 1997; panitch and swartz, 2003). in this sense, public services and collective bargaining have been gradually eroded over an otherwise “permanent era of austerity” (evans and albo, 2010). the severity of the great recession has merely intensified and given impetus to long-term efforts to undermine the public production and delivery of public services and reduce workers’ ability to chart a path independent from the vagaries of capital. indeed, democracy in the workplace, understood as the ability of workers to have a say over how and what gets made, under what conditions and what rewards, are proving increasingly incompatible with the logic of capitalist development. since the 1980s, there has been a slow but steady downward convergence in working conditions and wages, backed by employer and state efforts to lower working class expectations. these efforts have been in combination with unprecedented amounts of personal affluence among certain groups in the midst of public sector austerity. . as the great recession recedes from public scrutiny in canada, its aftereffects continue to frame political debate and strain public finances. despite the public treasury bailing-out corporations, supplying new subsidies, lowering corporate taxes, and increasing state spending in order to counter the recession, the banks and capitalist classes continue to demand public sector austerity. emphasis has increasingly moved away from a critical investigation into the historical origins and root causes of the recession, excessive executive compensation, and even inquiries into the nature of capitalism to an emphasis on cutting public services and attacking those who produce, deliver and use those services, the poor, the elderly, and beyond. in our view, the redefinition of the crisis as stemming from a bloated and inefficient public sector and unionized workers’ wages more broadly, can be understood as nothing less than a great deception. this is not to imply that those who believe that the public sector is wasteful and unproductive are duped or foolish, nor to suggest that the public sector is uniformly a beacon of efficiency (since efficiency itself is a politically loaded phrase that often obscures more than it reveals), but to draw attention to the purposeful attempt to obfuscate, confuse, muddy, mislead and deflect critical inquiry away from a social and economic system —capitalism —that not only caused the crisis but constrains the scope for change. the essays collected here ensure that such a deception does not go unnoticed. 10 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism while greater detail is beyond the purview of this short editorial introduction and issue in its entirety, it is our contention that a new historical project that seeks to transcend (neoliberal) capitalism is urgently needed. a strong starting point for such a project —counter to the prevailing orthodoxy —is to expand the scope of the public sector. while the capitalist class bathed in excess in the midst of the crisis, politicians, the media and leading business pundits dogmatically asserted that workers must do more with less, that pensions, healthcare, unemployment insurance and social services were in need of modernization to better fit the new normal of declining working class incomes, increasingly ineffective collective bargaining, and global competition for investment. honest explanations as to why such social protections were no longer possible were few and far between. the fact that decades of cuts to high-income earners and corporations’ taxes had utterly failed to produce any real benefits for the majority of working people continued to elude the economic and political officialdom. quite paradoxically, decades of neoliberal reforms almost disappeared from the historical record as collective dementia (or deception) shifted the debate away from the origins and causes of the private sector-led great recession to a one-sided emphasis on the public sector. in our view, making the case for an expanded public sector necessarily entails the conversion of spaces formerly understood to be the sacrosanct domain of the private sector. nationalizing some parts of the economy, from the banking and finance sectors which sustain the institutional power of capital to the goods-producing sectors which create tangible outputs, may open up the possibility for escaping from the cycle of austerity and retrenchment which has long since characterized the body politic. democracy is never a fast-frozen state of being. rather democratic rights and freedoms are always a work in progress. expanding the terrain of the public sector via the democratization of finance and industry, carries the potential to deepen and extend such popular capacities, rights and freedoms. as marx (1875, n.p.) once put it, freedom consists in converting the state from being an organ of despotism superimposed upon society to one completely subordinate to it. thus an alternative class project from below must seek to extend the application of democratic forms out of the limited political sphere and into the organization of society as a whole. in a similar vein, marx also suggested that social reforms are never carried out by the weakness of the strong, but always by the strength of the weak (marx, 1847, n.p.). despite the setbacks to trade unionists and social editorial introduction from great recession to great deception | 11 justice activists over the period of neoliberalism, new political forms and organizational experiments are necessary in order to turn defeats into victory. all things considered, contrary to claims that the great recession is a thing of the past —as p.m. harper and finance minister flaherty are keen to remind —the articles assembled here collectively shatter the myth of canadian exceptionalism by showing that the aftershocks of the recession continue to have grave implications. starting us off, jim stanford debunks the notion that canada stands as a bastion of economic stability and superior economic management. rather, he demonstrates the shortcomings of conventional economic indicators arguing, contrary to mainstream analyses, that canada’s so-called recovery has been incomplete and relatively weak when compared with similar organization for economic cooperation and development countries. stoney and krawchencko follow with an overview of the transition from rescue strategies to exit strategies, that is, the shift from stimulus to austerity. they analyze where and how large changes in spending and restraint have taken place within the narrative of ‘crisis’ and the political opportunism that this has afforded. their analysis shows that rather than abandoning the neoliberal project, recent budgets, policies and priorities indicate a more intense and comprehensive neoliberal agenda is emerging in canada. moving forward, toby sanger argues that the acceleration of neoliberal-inspired austerity budgets will accomplish the same thing as previous recessions: lowering wage growth and shrinking the share of labour’s national income. focusing on the 2011 and 2012 federal conservative budgets, he makes the case that conventional economic approaches are incapable of adequately addressing contemporary needs, thus an alternative framework is gravely needed.the following article by heather whiteside explores the troubled track record of public-private-partnerships (p3s) in canada when delivering public infrastructure and services. her chapter investigates how recent projects in british columbia and ontario —“p3 enthusiasts” —have enabled privatization measures while disabling public oversight. the fifth article in this issue by joel harden details the canadian labour congress’ (clc) “retirement security for everyone” campaign. harden discusses how the clc grappled with the complexities of canada’s pension plan and the concrete challenges encountered along the way. despite some important shortcomings in the clc’s campaign, harden stresses the importance of expanding canada’s public pension plan in accordance with rebuilding the political capacities of organized 12 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism labour. the final article by david camfield problematizes the uncritical treatment of ‘trade union bureaucracy’ by academics and labour activists asking what do we mean when we talk about the trade union bureaucracy? in short, he argues that the sources of bureaucracy in unions lie in wage-labour contracts, the separation of conception from execution in human practical activity, the political administration of unions by state power, and the trade union officialdom. this year’s interventions section, which continues ar’s long-held emphasis on pushing the boundaries of academic orthodoxy, brings together some of the most original and innovative thinkers in a variety of sub-fields. in her wide-ranging and insightful interview, ellen meiksins wood discusses the similarities and differences of the current phase of austerity with past policy objectives; what is meant by “political marxism”; ongoing debates about the value of the term “imperialism”; the significance of the occupy movements and horizontalism; and the importance of freedom as a politically animating principle. the following interview with michael lebowitz explores the current crisis of world capitalism and its relation to canadian exceptionalism; the present state of the anti-capitalist left and its relation to party politics; the contradictions of ‘really-existing socialism’ and what socialistic responses to the recession might look like. in “neoliberalization and the matrix of action”, neil brenner, jamie peck and nick theodore take us through an examination of the different forms that neoliberalism has taken over the years; the urban dimensions of the crisis and the specific ways in which cities reproduce capital accumulation yet create openings for organized resistance to the ongoing encroachments of capital; the significance of the right to the city and occupy movements; and the importance of counter-hegemonic strategies and alternatives to capitalism. in the following commentary, shelia block considers the gender and distributional impacts of the 2012 ontario budget. she argues that reductions to services will have disproportionate impacts on low-income ontarians, and racialized and immigrant communities. furthermore, block shows how cutbacks in public sector employment will increase inequality and unemployment, in addition to expanding the share of unpaid caregiving work done primarily by women. an interview with david newhouse follows where he discusses the impacts of austerity on aboriginal communities. newhouse discusses issues related to housing and poverty reduction; health and education; mandatory minimum sentences and their impact on rehabilitative services; the relationship between first nations communities and social justice; and the continuing importance of first editorial introduction from great recession to great deception | 13 nations studies. in his valuable study of the electro-motive lockout, herman rosenfeld addresses the shortcomings and limitations of union tactics and strategy in fighting against concessionary demands from the caterpillar-owned plant. he asks why unions’ responses to concessionary demands have been so tepid and unwilling to demonstrate some of the confrontational tactics of the past? while rosenfeld is critical of the union’s non-occupation, he concludes that unions themselves are incapable of posing alternative industrial strategies that reject corporatism and dependence on progressive-sounding schemes for competitive private sector projects. instead, he argues that this requires a larger socialist and anti-capitalist movement —left of social democracy —that could research, debate and place a range of alternatives onto the larger political arena. the final article by sam gindin argues that the ‘crisis’ that desperately needs addressing is not just the economic crisis but the crisis inside the labour movement. he argues that working people have now been under concerted attack for some three decades, culminating in the austerity agenda presented as the ‘solution’ to the latest crisis. gindin reminds that the last time an economic and social crisis this deep occurred —the great depression of the 1930s —working people responded by reinventing forms of labour organization: placing industrial unionism firmly on the map and introducing dramatic new tactics like sit-downs and plant occupations. he asks: what comparable institutional and strategic changes might emerge from the present moment? rounding off ar’s thirty-sixth year of publication and twenty-fourth issue are ten book reviews which explore issues ranging from social movements and progressive activism to indigenous resistance, revolutionary health care and political theory. in including a broad survey of recently published material we hope that readers will find our reviews section useful. this issue of alternate routes would not have been possible without the tremendous support of carleton university’s departments of: sociology and anthropology; political science; law; geography and environmental studies; as well as, the institute of interdisciplinary studies; institute of political economy; and the faculty of graduate and postdoctoral affairs. we would also like to thank ryerson university’s department of politics and public administration and, in particular, the very generous support —financial, administrative and otherwise —of the centre for labour-management relations at the ted rogers school of management, and its director maurice maze14 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism rolle. thanks are also due to eric leclerc and hillary ryde collins for their valuable assistance. without the above-mentioned sources of support, this issue of ar would not have been possible. we look forward to what we hope is a long and fruitful relationship in the promotion of critical social research. last but certainly not least, a sincere thank you to all contributors and referees who took time out of their schedules to write, review, revise and re-evaluate the articles assembled here. your commitment to the most pressing issues of the day is a constant reminder of the importance of dissenting voices. for that we are grateful. in the year since the publication of ar’s 2011 issue, we are pleased to have added an online photo and video section which contains a series of presentations from past ar conferences.2 thanks are due to pance stojkovski for his tremendous assistance in editing 2012’s online conference presentations. we hope that readers and viewers will find them useful for stimulating class and other discussions. as a final note, all previously published material from 1977 to 2012 are now fully available on our website —www.alternateroutes. ca —free of charge. references cross, p. (2011). how did the 2008-10 recession and recovery compare to previous cycles. statistics canada. http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/11010-x/2011001/partpartie3-eng.htm evans, b. and g. albo. (2010). permanent austerity: the politics of the canadian exit strategy from fiscal stimulus. in fanelli, c. , c. hurl, p. lefebvre and g. ozcan (eds.), saving global capitalism: interrogating austerity and working class responses to crises (pp.7-28). ottawa: red quill books. fanelli, c. (forthcoming, 2012). fragile future. public services and collective bargaining in an era of austerity. unpublished doctoral dissertation. carleton university, ottawa, on. international monetary fund. (2011, september). world economic outlook: slowing growth, rising risks. http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/ weo/2011/02/pdf/text.pdf laxer, j. (2009). beyond the bubble: imagining a new canadian economy. toronto: between the lines. marx, k. (1847). the poverty of philosophy. http://www.marxists.org/archive/ marx/works/subject/hist-mat/pov-phil/ch02.htm 2 see http://www.alternateroutes.ca/index.php/ar/pages/view/video editorial introduction from great recession to great deception | 15 ———(1875). critique of the gotha programme. http://www.marxists.org/ archive/marx/works/1875/gotha/ mcbride, s. and j. shields. (1997). dismantling a nation: the transition to corporate rule in canada, second edition. halifax: fernwood publishing. panitch, l. & d. swartz. (2003). from consent to coercion: the assault on trade union freedoms. aurora, on: garamond press. book review: debt, the imf, and the world bank | 255 book review debt, the imf, and the world bank: sixty questions, sixty answers by eric toussaint and damien millet. new york: monthly review press, 2010. $17.95 us. isbn: 978-1-58367-222-8. pages: 1-361. reviewed by jillian l. curtin1 in their book, debt, the imf, and the world bank: sixty questions, sixty answers, eric toussaint and damien millet provide an extensive overview of the impact that debt has on highly indebted poor countries (hipcs). they show how debt inhibits hipcs from investing in infrastructure, health, education, and other development-oriented socialpolicies. the problem, they argue, is not just debt itself, but the capitalist global economic system that fuels it. this process contributes to an endless cycle of poverty and human suffering. the book is written for a general audience. it is organized in a way that showcases the causes of the cyclical debt crisis, the major actors involved, and ways of addressing the problems. it is especially proficient in outlining how private actors in the global financial system have had a negative impact on hipcs. throughout the book toussaint and millet display marxists overtones. their critique of the global financial system and the exploitive nature of the global trade system is accurate. they provide some “radical alternatives” to the current, broken system. however, many of their ideas are not overly radical. for example, their argument focusing on the elimination of structural adjustment programs (saps) is in line with many other experts in the field. in fact, this discussion on saps is the highlight of the book. toussaint and millet give an in depth explanation of the role saps have played in this debt crisis. they describe them as entities geared toward developing institutions and policies to allow private foreign investment into countries. this process shapes the structure of the domestic political economic policy in debtor countries. it gives lenders 1 jillian curtin is currently completing her ph.d. in political science at carleton university, with a focus on political economy. she specializes in governance of the global economy and the politics of private enterprise. she is also the co-founder and content manager of discourse magazine. 256 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism the ability to control indebted countries through conditionality which has helped to create a system of dependence, exploitation, and indirect rule. the use of saps not only interferes with sovereignty but implies that some countries lack the ability to rule themselves. toussaint and millet argue that any lending should consist of a simple transaction in which the lender provides money solely on the condition that the debtor will pay it back. conditions should not be applied. it is difficult to disagree with this position. interestingly, toussaint and millet do not call for the abolition of lending and debt all-together. however, they do argue against usury. they claim that private banks and investment houses in the global north have been making “easy money” off of the global south. these countries have paid back their debts – many times over – but the interest in some cases is so high that an endless cycles of debt ensues. they also argue against certain foreign “investment” in hipcs. they believe that often this “investment” is a cover which allows wealthier countries to take hipcs’ natural resources without sufficient financial compensation. this has had profound ecological and economic consequences for hipcs and is why the shift toward chinese investment – even though china infringes less on sovereignty – is simply exchanging one resource exploiter for another. they articulate that the process of external loans in exchange for resources does not help a hipc establish long-term human and/or economic development. it is the conditions under which lending and debt are currently conducted which is the crux of the problem. one problem with this book is the way in which it answers its own questions. while they ask some great questions, often their answers could be further unpacked. for example, in addition to their argument on how debt has redistributed financial resources from important social policies like health and education they make some important points about the impact of debt on resources and food sovereignty. but, the analysis of these problems is somewhat shallow. more space could have been dedicated to explaining why these areas are essential to meaningful development. the analysis is also problematic when they discuss the significance of self-determination and the right to self-governance. deeper, empirically grounded examples and a theoretical examination of the consequences of resources depletion and food sovereignty would have added more to their argument and allowed this book to make a deeper contribution to contemporary debates on development and debt. book review: debt, the imf, and the world bank | 257 a second problem is, at several points, the book borders on becoming a polemic. often the author’s choice of words is incendiary. they use loaded language to support their argument in areas where more empirically based explanations are desirable. this detracts from their overall argument. for example, they claim that the debt burden has “crushed all attempts” for hipcs to develop. in addition to the implication of hopelessness, the tenor of the phrase externalizes the responsibility of development and ignores any complicity amongst the governments of the hipcs. this is a problem found throughout the book. another issue with this work is that their solutions are only partly explained. they argue that much of the citizenry in hipcs are too poor to formally participate in the market. as such, only governments are able to redistribute wealth and provide the programs necessary for human and economic development. however, they do not adequately address the potential problems of economic corruption associated with authoritarian regimes and shell governments. their correlation between the elimination of debt and deterring the formation and maintenance of authoritarian regimes is weakly argued. the rationale toussaint and millet do provide – that the immediate forgiveness of debt acquired under dictators would deter external lenders from providing credit to dictators – counters their own call for the abolition of the current risk and confidence-based financial system. this is a logical inconsistency in the book. government control of economic assets often leads to dictatorships. toussaint and millet also fail to explain how wealth will be generated in these countries once debt is forgiven. aside from these problems toussaint and millet do provide a general overview of how the burden of debt is crippling development efforts in many countries. this is an ongoing crisis that has been overlooked in the wake of the current economic crisis that is preoccupying european and american politics. their question and answer and answer format makes their work easy to understand. this book provides an enticing argument for interested readers with little to no background in economics, politics, or development studies. commentary : imaginaries and realities, utopia and dystopia | 265 commentary imaginaries and realities, utopia and dystopia garry potter is associate professor of sociology at wilfred laurier university (waterloo, ontario, canada) . he is author of the bet: truth in science, literature and everyday knowledges, the philosophy of social science: new perspectives, and co-edited (with jose lopez) after postmodernism . more recently he wrote and published dystopia: what is to be done? and made a documentary film of the same title . the film can be viewed for free and downloaded for educational purposes from the website www .dystopiafilm .com . introduction: contradictions of hope and despair the dystopia thesis is an analysis of humanity’s most serious problems of the present and a prediction of them being exacerbated and added to in the near future. i have presented this thesis in some detail in my 2010 book dystopia: what is to be done? i also made a documentary film of the same name that is available for free viewing (http://www. dystopiafilm.com). what i intend to do here, is to give a summarised flavour of the overall argument presented in the book and film, but also add some reflections upon the utopian dreams of both right and left, and more importantly consider the left’s continued failure to construct a left vision that captures ordinary people’s imagination and enthusiasm. the dystopia thesis propounds an argument that the structural features of the world political economy are such as to make the problems we collectively face impossible to solve. the dystopia thesis is grounded in present day fact and highly probabilistic trajectories and outcomes as regards the future. the logic and empirical content of the dystopia thesis concludes a near certain hopelessness with respect to avoiding a future of unimaginable horror and suffering. causally inter-connected, mutually enhancing catastrophes, are around the corner . . . and there is nothing we can do to prevent them yet at the same time, the dystopia thesis was founded on the contradiction of pessimistic assessment and sincere hope. if one believed absolutely in the hopelessness of any effort to avert catastrophe what would be the point in articulating the argument? 266 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times utopia and dystopia are bound up together in complex ways. both have their causal effects of interpenetration of imaginaries and realities. for example, both liberal and socialist utopias form a part of contemporary dystopian reality, as ideological barriers to an accurate understanding of both the present and future possibilities. the apocalyptic media visions of life after the bomb . . . or virus or asteroid strike etc. etc., also contribute to a lack of understanding of what is now and what might come to pass in the near future. these imaginaries are part of our dystopian reality because they serve to deceive and mystify us with regard to real problems. i will begin by summarising the dystopia thesis, giving particular attention to its knowledge, power and ideology component: the theory of structural mystification. i will then reflect upon some of the ways both utopian and dystopian fictions feed into this mystification. finally, i shall embrace the dystopia thesis’s own contradictions (that is to say my own) and discuss how a vision of hope is the only hope we have, how the dystopia thesis ultimately calls for a new marxist imaginary, a realistically feasible, yet nonetheless inspiring, utopian vision to sustain us in our struggles. this last component of this piece is perhaps too big to be anything other than a preliminary reflection here. it is a task i have been wrestling with ever since i began my work upon the dystopia thesis. the question of what is to be done was not part of my original project because quite frankly i only had the vaguest of vague ideas about what should be done. i was also, on some levels, persuaded that there was nothing to be done. i had only an instinct that sounding the alarm, as it were, might contribute to mitigating the horrors to come. however, as the project progressed it became clear that i simply could not present the dystopian vision and argument without engaging with potential strategies for dealing with the problems with respect to many of the dystopia thesis’s individual components, many people have provided far gloomier assessments than i. i tended to be rather cautious with predictions of catastrophe and apocalypse. but the cumulative emotional effect of seeing put together as a causally inter-linked conclusion, all the worst environmental problems facing humankind, along with all the most extreme suffering of poverty and disease, appeared to be too much for most of the people i consulted with. they told me that some strategies for the amelioration of crises had to at least be entertained, along with the analysis of their cause. some balance of hope had to be given along with analysis of calamity commentary : imaginaries and realities, utopia and dystopia | 267 however, my reflections upon the question of what is to be done began with critique. the analysis was of the inadequacies of many of the popular propounded solutions to the problems that were most serious. for example, the technocratic solutions to the world’s food or transport problems may have some value but miss the main point: the problems are most significantly political-economic problems rather than technological. for another example, charity may mitigate a small amount of suffering in the immediate present but cannot even begin to address the ocean of pain deriving from the systematically produced extremes of world poverty finally, i realized that utopian thinking, the right kind of utopian thinking that is, is actually a necessary counter-point to the dystopia thesis. it is a great irony that left-wing analysis, more specifically marxist analysis, is everywhere being proven correct and yet is not attended to. capitalism is in crisis on many fronts. there are rumblings of resistance and revolution in many parts of the world. and yet in the first world, most particularly in the american “heart of the beast”, where some of the contradictions of wealth and poverty are most extreme, the left has never been weaker . my conclusion with respect to this, is that while intellectual analysis of the problems has never been as acute, there still lacks an inspiring vision of a better world that is realistic enough for masses of people to see beyond the inertia of their present day to day living. reflection upon this situation shall be the conclusion of the article. the dystopia thesis the first argument of the dystopia thesis is that the future of misery and crisis that is dystopia is already here. perhaps a billion people live lives of such dreadful daily experience as to reduce any concerns about the future to the most immediate. they are starving or close to starving. they are watching their children being sold into the slavery of bonded labour or prostitution. they are dying of malaria or plague or tuberculosis or aids or any number of diseases. they live in a mundane poverty-stricken everyday life. or worse, they are incarcerated and perhaps are being tortured this very second. the list can go on and on through the drama of war and refugees, to the boredom and unpleasantness of under-paid, soul-destroying employment or unemployment. the future is already here for a billion people, if the future is dystopia the dystopia thesis’s predictions of the future are mainly simple probabilistic extensions of present problems being exacerbated. we are just beginning to see the effects of global warming but we can well 268 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times imagine increased future problems of flooding and hurricanes. and global warming is merely the most dramatic of the wide variety of environmental problems facing us. many of these link up with issues of resource shortages and energy. so yes, the dystopia thesis is a very simple argument in many respects: things that are bad now and are going to get worse however, entirely new problems are coming as well. peak oil will add to existing inequality, suffering, terrorism and warfare. but even more importantly, at some point, it will make our existing socio-political economic system impossible to maintain. there will be a post-carbon economy. this is coming whatever we do. but the dystopia thesis predicts an excruciatingly painful transition to this post-carbon future the dystopia thesis is also a causal analysis. on the one hand, it takes note of the immense complexity of inter-linkages of problems and causality. it observes the positive feedback loops and their snowballing effects. on the other hand, however, it posits a broad context of common structural causality. the world capitalist system possesses structural features that ensures extreme inequality and thus poverty. poverty is not only an effect that is suffered but is in turn a cause of many, many other problems. in this regard, the dystopia thesis is essentially marxist. it thus sees inequality, unemployment and poverty as features of the world political economy that are not contingent but rather are fundamental to the system unemployment rates (in any country), for example, may rise or fall; that much is contingent upon a variety of factors; but whether there is to be unemployment or not at all, that is not a variable. some level of unemployment is functionally necessary to the system. this is among the reasons why the dystopia thesis rejects reformism as a potential solution to the avoidance of dystopia the world capitalist system is just that, a world system1. globalization is not something new; it is an on-going developing process that emerged simultaneously with the birth of capitalism. the development of the richer countries was dependent upon the lack of development in the poorer. development and underdevelopment evolved together. the wealth of the rich, whether it be people or nations, is dependent upon the lack thereof by the poor the particularities of recent global economic change and the neo-liberal economic ideologies and policies that have driven them have had many dire consequences of course. but neo-liberalism per 1  i am indebted for the world systems theory here to immanual wallerstein and andre gunder frank. commentary : imaginaries and realities, utopia and dystopia | 269 se is not the real problem. capitalism is the real problem. a return to keynesian economic policies may well save capitalism from some of its contemporary crises . . . but it will not save us from dystopia2. it will not save the world; inequality will be maintained; the suffering of that inequality will be maintained; environmental destruction will continue unabated. in addition to a structural logic of profit which necessitates inequality, the world capitalist system has a structurally determined time-frame for decision and action. it has a temporal logic, which ensures that potentially beneficial decisions and actions of collective pain avoidance and responsible environmental stewardship will come too late. the peak oil problem can be used to clearly illustrate this. as we all know, the problem of peak oil is not that we will run out of oil eventually. rather it is that after the capacity for world production peaks, demand will not slacken but continue its ever increasing pressure. prices will dramatically rise to a point whereby the present world system of trade and commerce, of energy and transport, of agriculture and consumption, simply will not be able to continue without drastic change. we will move into what people are beginning to call a post-carbon world. the dystopian point with respect to the peak oil problem is not that a post-carbon world is necessarily a future to be feared. no, the problem, the future to be feared, is the transition to it. we could imagine (and people have, which we will discuss in a moment) a post-carbon economy and world as actually a good thing in many ways. what world capitalism will ensure is that the sensible planning in advance that would enable a smooth painless major transition of economy and lifestyle will not occur. capitalism’s political-economic temporal logic forbids it. there is a further key factor in capitalism which keeps our most serious problems from being effectively engaged with. this is the problem of power and knowledge and ideology. structural mystification structural mystification is the negative side of the dialectical contradiction found in the institutional production of knowledge. structural mystification exists as a counterpart to the real knowledge production and dissemination practices of the media, the education system and all other institutions fundamentally concerned with the production and dissemination of knowledge 2  see the excellent critique of the return to keynesian economics by richard wolff (2011). 270 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times the relationship between power and knowledge has been theorized in innumerable ways. ideology has also been theorized from many conflicting, and frequently confusing, perspectives. the key points of the theory of structural mystification, however, are clear and relatively simple3. power sometimes corrupts the production and dissemination of knowledge. but it is not as though the production of knowledge could take place without the influence of power relations. no, institutional power relations also facilitate the production and dissemination of knowledge. this is why the relationship between power and knowledge is dialectical. knowledge production (and dissemination) most significantly takes place within institutions. the institutions all have within them a dialectical contradiction for example, the university generally is fundamentally concerned with the production and dissemination of knowledge. this is not a contingent feature but essential to the very nature of what a university is. that that is not all the institution is, does not change this fact. knowledge production is fundamental in a way that having a football team is not (however important that may be for some universities). but also fundamental to the very nature of a university, is the dialectical opposite to knowledge production and dissemination: the obfuscation of the production of knowledge and the restriction and sometimes outright prevention of the dissemination of knowledge. while all university faculty would be forced to acknowledge that this sometimes occurs, few are aware that it is not a contingent feature the university, amongst other things, is a complex structural hierarchy of power relations. further, it is connected to the broader hierarchies and complexities of the power relations of the world . . . of the world capitalist system. this is not any simple matter of conspiracy or propaganda or intentional distortion. rather the production and dissemination of knowledge takes place at the nexus of many different levels of conflict there is frequently a conflict between the institution and the government in terms of priorities of spending on research and pedagogy, and in terms of academic freedom of speech and critique and dissent. there is an ongoing conflict between the priorities of the board of governors and the university senate. there is a constant scrambling over scarce resources between faculties and departments. there is genuine intellectual debate and politically coerced loyalties and acts of bad faith. there is not only conflict between individuals but conflict within individuals. 3  for a more complete account see potter, 2010c. commentary : imaginaries and realities, utopia and dystopia | 271 there is a struggle to “do the right thing” and a struggle to know what that is. it is both a moral and an intellectual struggle . . . and one that takes place very often within a mystifying fog . . . a mystifying fog that they both suffer and frequently help to construct. it is not for nothing that the word “academic” also has a pejorative sense to it. and as pierre bourdieu (1988, p. 207) puts it, academics are often “mystified mystifiers” the first ideological victims of the operations of power and classification they perform. structural mystification is also structurally embedded within science itself. yes, even that tremendous tool for acquiring information and potential understanding of so many things is frequently corrupted through its practical and ideological contextualization within the wider political economy. and yet science on another level, is absolutely our only hope of coming to terms with the crises of dystopia. there is a plethora of examples to choose from to make these points about science here. but i will briefly mention the “hydrogen highway” and hydrogen automobile. the hydrogen car (in a variety of formats) is often propounded by politicians and auto makers as the future solution to the problems of global warming and peak oil. it doesn’t use oil and it doesn’t pollute (directly). there is not space in this article to go into the practical limitations of this technology in relation to the political economy of it. these have been thoroughly explored elsewhere (see for example demirbas, 2009, romm, 2005, and the unattributed article on the alternative energies website). no, the major importance of the hydrogen “solution” is mystificatory. its practical realization is always far enough in the future as to necessitate a continuance of the gasoline vehicle status quo. the utopian promise of the idea is sufficient though, to deflect political action toward any more immediately viable technological solutions knowledge production and dissemination, including scientific knowledge production and dissemination, is profoundly affected by politics . . . and politics is profoundly affected by knowledge . . . and the lack of it. the problems of dystopia, whether global poverty or global warming, require radical change. radical change requires significant mass-scale collective political will. political will requires knowledge. the knowledge gets produced, as does its mystifying ideological counter-arguments and “facts”. the knowledge gets distributed . . . on a restricted scale. the knowledge gets produced and receives a restricted dissemination but the ideological counter-points are trumpeted and/or subtly and insidiously whispered in the media, or taught in the schools or even at home 272 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times among the most potent elements of dystopia with respect to knowledge and ideology are the utopian visions that grab the collective imagination. the utopian imaginaries are part and parcel of our dystopian reality. the utopian dream of capitalist reform slavoj zizek quotes john caputo (caputo and vattimo, 2009, p. 124-125) to make a point about utopian thinking concerning the possibilities of reforming the capitalist system: i would be perfectly happy if the far left politicians in the united states were able to reform the system by providing universal health care, effectively redistributing wealth more equitably with a revised irs code, effectively restricting campaign financing, enfranchising all voters, treating migrant workers humanely, and effecting multilateral foreign policy that would integrate american power within the international community etc., i.e., intervene upon capitalism by means of serious and far-reaching reforms. . . if after doing all that badiou and zizek complained that some monster called capital still stalks us, i would be inclined to greet that monster with a yawn. zizek (2009, p. 79) does not dispute whether such reforms would make for a better world, or even if we might be better able to remain within the system if such far reaching reforms were possible. instead he argues that: the problem lies with the “utopian premise” that it is possible to achieve all that within the coordinates of global capitalism. what if the particular malfunctionings of capitalism enumerated by caputo are not merely accidental disturbances but are rather structurally necessary? just to be completely clear, i will answer zizek’s rhetorical question. the “malfunctionings” are not such at all; the ill treatment of migrant workers, for example, is certainly a moral shame, but it is not because of an accidental flaw in the system. no, it and the rest enumerated by caputo, are structurally necessary to the system. utopian visions and dystopian realities vision. this is what we would like to see in our political leaders. in america, and elsewhere as well of course, but especially in america, vision is in short supply. so we are given utopian fiction. but it is often presented not as a vision of the future but as a pious hope for the present, through the idealized glasses of memory. it was not president bush or clinton or reagan that gave us this poetized vision, a: commentary : imaginaries and realities, utopia and dystopia | 273 . . . reminder of the time when two powerful nations challenged each other and then boldly raced into outer space. what would be the next thing to challenge us, that makes us go farther and work harder? you know when smallpox was eradicated? it was considered the single greatest humanitarian achievement of the century. surely we can do it again. as we did in a time when our eyes looked towards the heavens and with outstretched fingers, we touched the face of god. yes, poetic indeed, but it was president bartlett of the west wing (episode 5, 1999), not obama, that articulated this vision of past and future. its resonance, of course, is with kennedy and the beginnings of the “space race”. but along with kennedy’s perceived martyrdom (to what exactly?, i often wonder) goes a collective amnesia of the real fear of nuclear holocaust and a total ignorance of what was really going on with the cuban missile crisis. forgotten also, is the bay of pigs; and most of all it is forgotten that it was with kennedy that the american involvement in vietnam began the eradication of smallpox was undoubtedly a truly wonderful achievement. bartlett says: “surely we can do it again”. and of course this should be true. but this utopian moral imperative, stands alongside the historical reality of the tragic failure to eradicate malaria. in 1958, the worldwide effort to eradicate malaria began in earnest. it was led by paul russell from harvard’s school of public health. the united states congress directly allocated $23 million a year towards the battle. it also provided 90 percent of the world health organization’s anti-malaria budget and a significant proportion of the budgets of the pan-american health organization and unicef (united nations children’s education foundation). this constituted a financial commitment in the order of billions in today’s dollars. it was a serious commitment to eradicate a serious collective human problem. but it also was an effort with a definite time limit to it. paul russell in his international development advisory board report emphasized the time line of malaria eradication: four years of ddt spraying and four years of monitoring that there are three consecutive years of no mosquito transmission in an area. he also emphasized the dangers of failing to complete the program of eradication: ddt resistance, renewed disease pandemics and a virtual economic impossibility of having another attempt in the future be successful. a four-year commitment was made, and four years of funding was what was given. four years were nearly enough. in 1955, sri lanka had a million cases of malaria. in 1963, it had only eighteen. 274 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times only another two or three years of concerted effort and financial commitment would have given the world the same success with malaria as it had had with smallpox. but the funding was cut off4. the result, of course, was not merely the failure to eradicate something that was eradicable. the result was to make the problem worse, much worse. the insects developed resistance to ddt and other pesticides. the malarial parasites developed resistances to quinine, chloroquine and other drugs. most importantly, in areas where the mosquitoes and disease would almost certainly make a comeback, many millions of people now lacked all resistance to the disease. by cutting off funding to the eradication efforts, congress and the other “money people” were condemning millions of people to death in the future. such is the relationship between the time frame for capitalist political economic planning and future calamity. such is the relation between eloquent vision and a sad reality. but if the harsh reality stands in contrast to utopian vision there is something rather pathetic about the vision as well. people often imagine utopia as something very like small town america in the fifties. the dark side of this hope was portrayed nicely in the film pleasantville (ross, 1998). but as good as this film was, it cannot stand in comparison to the real life utopian monument to this vision of the world. i’m speaking here of the disney-built small town celebration near disney world in florida. it looks like main street usa in disney land but it is a real town that people live and work in. as someone once put it “it just seems to be the perfect little town back in a nicer time. except it feels creepy”.5 what is to be done? the answers to the question of what is to be done which i gave in my book and film were all fairly obvious. they could be fundamentally articulated in a number of traditional leftist slogans: “the people (the left, the workers) united will never be defeated”, “union!”, “one solution, revolution” “occupy, resist, produce” and so on. i advocated boycotts and protests and taking it to the street. i criticized reformist compromise and charitable band-aids. in short, i advocated what the radical left has advocated for years. that these activities and slogans are obvious does not diminish their importance nor their power to effect change (witness tunisia 4  i am indebted to laurie garret’s excellent (1995, p. 48-52) account for all the factual information of this history. 5  name withheld by request. commentary : imaginaries and realities, utopia and dystopia | 275 or egypt for recent examples of this). but still, in the face of all the forces of structural mystification, something crucial seems lacking. the masses may have been teeming into the streets of tunis and cairo; the poor may have come down from the shanty towns of caracas to have thwarted the 2002 coup in venezuela, but. . .while the arrest report of toronto’s 2010 g20 protests was impressive in terms of numbers, the numbers of people who merely peacefully marched in protest was on a relative scale, pitifully small. most torontonians, most canadians, simply went about their ordinary business and watched the violence on tv as a spectacle which had nothing to do with them. my point here again is obvious; cairo and toronto are different worlds; the developed and the developing, the core and the periphery, are miles apart in present political potential, as well as in terms of their economies but the problem is that we are one world; so the “first world” needs a revolution too. but the political consciousness is not there. . .or rather it is not here . there are contradictions in this. the majority of the affluent middle classes in countries such as canada or the us cannot seem to grasp what is obvious to millions of peasants and workers in the developing world. is it that their affluence blinds them? some would have us think so. but there is more to it than that marxist analysis of capitalism is repeatedly, and everywhere, being proven correct. right wing ideology is not faring well. we have had, for example, such an intellectual big gun for laissez-faire capitalism as alan greenspan admitting he was fundamentally wrong. . . about everything. yet in north america and europe, the left has never been weaker. why? i don’t presume to reduce the answer to this question to a single cause. however, i do want to focus here upon one of the causes. the left has thus far failed to articulate a positive vision of the future that truly catches people’s imagination! there is, of course, a good historical and analytical set of reasons for this failure. early in its history socialist thought divided in terms of hard and soft. proponents of these softer versions of socialism seemed to spend a lot of time dreaming. for many marxists the term “utopian socialism” was a pejorative. . .and rightly so. to spell out in great detail a picture of the future without having paid any attention to the process of getting there, without a proper appreciation of the problems of the present, is utopian in this negative sense, simply because the thinking is unrealistic. 276 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times it may be the case that there also is a certain, necessarily utopian element, to the dream of overthrowing of capital. but can one dream and still be realistic? can we fly and yet be grounded? good marxist analysis does not predict too specifically about the future. it rightly concludes that there are simply too many variables for such to be sensibly done. so where does that leave us? one of the excellent stunts of the yes men (2009) has given me an idea in this regard. they printed and distributed a hoax version of the new york times. this satirical version of the times had such headlines as “iraq war ends”, “maximum wage law succeeds” “popular pressure ushers recent progressive tilt: study cites movements for massive shift in dc” and “nationalized oil to fund climate change efforts”. there was a small caption by their times banner that gave me the idea: “all the news we hope to print”. we cannot realistically articulate a detailed far-off in the future vision. but we can clearly see what is wrong now. this can be our realistically grounded imaginary: the many problems being immediately solved let us begin articulating things that could be done, things just beyond the political realities of the moment, but nonetheless easily imagined. i have had so many conversations with ideology derived ignorant people about socialism. “well, if all property is going to be shared, does that mean somebody else will be allowed to use my toothbrush?”. or “ . . . just how exactly is it going to be organized for people to do their little bit of literary criticism in the afternoon?”. the conversation needs to be changed. john steinbeck articulated the direction of such a change in his classic novel the grapes of wrath: “what’s a red anyway?” “a red is somebody who, if you’re getting paid 15 cents an hour thinks you should get 25” “oh . . . i guess i’m a red then”. it is testimony to the power of such simplicity that when hollywood made their film of this novel they transformed this conversation. in answer to the question of what a red was the answer was given; “it’s hard to say. . . i really don’t know”. so instead of trying to present some detailed blueprint of the far-off future, let us give a series of questions and strong simple answers to people about the present and the immediate future . . . of what could be done. how can we eliminate hunger in the world? we can take the entire canadian wheat crop and offer to transport it free to where food is most urgently needed. could we afford to do this? yes, it would take an evenly distributed tax increase of only about 2% to afford to have canada save the world from starvation all by itself! how can we provide basic education and health care to the whole world’s population? well, we could commentary : imaginaries and realities, utopia and dystopia | 277 take half of bill gates’ money, and half of warren buffet’s money, and this special tax upon the two of them could alone easily finance the effort. the serious problems of poverty could be realistically costed. these costs could then be presented along with the estimates of individual wealth. yes, personalizing it would make a great difference. people seem to get lost when one talks about the top one percent of one percent. four hundred people in the us have a combined wealth greater than the wealth of half of the population of the us (johnston, 2011). people’s heads swim when one talks about the trillions of dollars spent on defense. we need to present to people what could be done for the price of a fleet of battleships or a single stealth fighter. we need to present to people that such and such changes in the national and international laws relevant to generic drugs would save exactly how many lives of people dying of aids or tb. i am not arguing for a single campaign. no, it needs to be bigger than that. the left, the world’s left, needs to continually present a vision of all the things that could be so quickly and easily done to make a better world. “a better world now” could be the new slogan arising from an unflinching look at the horror of dystopia. references bichlbaum, andy and bonanno, mike (2009). the yes men fix the world, renegade pictures uk . bourdieu, pierre (1988). homo academicus, california: stanford university press. caputo, john and vattimo, gianni (2009). after the death of god, pp. 124-125, quoted in slavoj zizek first as tragedy, then as farce, london: verso: pp. 78-79. demirbhas, ayhan, (2009). biohydrogen: for future engine fuel demands, springer press. frank, andre gunder (1966). “the development of underdevelopment” monthly review, volume 18. _____. (1967). capitalism and underdevelopment in latin america: historical studies of chile and brazil, monthly review press. garrett, laurie (1995). the coming plague: newly emerging diseases in a world out of balance, new york: penguin. johnson, dave (2011). “9 pictures that expose this country’s obscene division of wealth” alternet .org . http://bearmarketnews. blogspot.com/2011/02/9-pictures-that-expose-this-countrys.html kunstler, james howard (2005). the long emergency: surviving the converging catastrophes of the twenty-first century, grove atlantic. 278 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times paine, chris (writer/director) (2006). who killed the electric car? sony pictures classics. potter, garry (2010a). dystopia: what is to be done?, waterloo: new revolution press. ____. (2010b). dystopia: what is to be done? the film version–www. dystopiafilm.com. ____. (2010c). “power and knowledge: a dialectical contradiction”, journal of critical realism, equinox publishing. romm, joseph, j. (2005). the hype about hydrogen: fact and fiction in the race to save the climate, island press. ross, gary (director) (1998). pleasantville, new line cinema. sorkin, aaron (writer/director) (1999). “season one episode five” the west wing, nbc. turteltaub, jon (2006) jericho, cbs paramount network television. unattributed (2011). “hydrogen fuel vehicles looking at the disadvantages of hydrogen fuel vehicles” http://www.alternativeenergyresources.net/hydrogenfuelvehicles.html wallerstein, immanual (1974). the modern world-system i: capitalist agriculture and the origins of the european world-economy in the sixteenth century, academic press inc. wolff, richard (2011). “the keynesian revival: a marxian critique”, alternate routes, 22, 103-14 zizek, slavoj (2009). first as tragedy, then as farce, london: verso. book review: the people’s lawyer | 273 book review the people’s lawyer by albert ruben. new york: monthly review press, 2011. $17.95 us paper. isbn: 978-1-58367-237-2. pages: 1-200. reviewed by rania tfaily1 “my job is to defend the constitution from its enemies. its main enemies right now are the justice department and the white house.” (bill goodman, legal director of the center for constitutional rights, 2001) for about five decades, the center for constitutional rights (ccr) has waged significant legal, educational and public awareness battles to defend marginalized communities and to uphold rights guaranteed by the u.s. constitution and the universal declaration of human rights. since its inception, it was dedicated to progressive politics, social justice and social change. it branded itself as being in the service of the people’s movements whether it is civil rights, women’s rights, war against vietnam, and more recently campaigns against torture, renditions and indefinite detention. the ccr cases often set legal precedents. however, the impact of the ccr varied with times. during the 1990s, it suffered from a financial crunch that intensified tensions between the board and staff. these tensions which have been brewing for a number of years culminated in the staff’s seven weeks long strike. after a period of decline, the ccr saw its fortunes and profile increase following 9/11 and the war on terror which resulted in human rights violations of thousands of arabs and muslims. the center’s decision to defend the right to habeas corpus of guantanamo detainees was a turning point given that the crc often focused on civil cases, and it tended to represent people with whom it usually shared a common (leftist) political vision. the ccr’s decision to take on the government of the u.s. during a time of high patriotic fever was not without its risks, and a number of individuals and organizations withdrew their financial support. after a definite defeat in two lower courts, the center’s legal effort culminated in a surprising and significant win in 1 rania tfaily is an assistant professor of sociology in the department of sociology and anthropology at carleton university, ottawa. 274 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism rasul vs. bush in which the u.s. supreme court ruled 6 to 3 that guantanamo detainees have the right to access the federal courts. the ccr’s budget rose from $1.2 million in 2001 to $5.5 million following this crucial victory. albert ruben takes us through a condensed history of the ccr, from its humble beginnings to help lawyers in the south who were challenging racial segregation and the disenfranchisement of the voting rights of african americans, to its involvement in women’s rights movement, antiwar activism and more recently its defense of victims of the war on terror. ruben shows how the ccr pioneered the creative use of the law by adopting novel and often untested arguments to launch legal battles along with educational campaigns with the purpose of facilitating social change. the ccr defined success not only in terms of winning cases and setting legal precedents but also in terms of its ability to raise public awareness and galvanize social movements. ruben provides us with detailed synopsis of the lives of the center’s four founding fathers – arthur kinoy, morton stavis, william kunstler, and benjamin smith. he shows the significant impact that a handful of hardworking, motivated and committed professionals and activists can make. ruben’s book includes a detailed chapter about the ccr’s most significant cases classified under “international human rights and solidarity”, “government misconduct”, and “attacks on dissent”. it is obvious that ruben highly values the ccr and the fighting spirits, motivation and dedication of its founding fathers and staff. nevertheless, he exposes the struggles and the difficulties encountered in running the ccr. he does not shy away from including unflattering characteristics of the founding fathers. “the people’s lawyer” is a valuable contribution detailing the history of one of the most progressive american organizations. it also depicts work-related challenges that face progressive organizations that do not wish to conform to the capitalist/ corporatist work model. these include monetary compensation, decision-making process, board-staff relations, and gender and generational tensions. the book raises the important question of how best to facilitate social change and whether channeling the struggle through the courts and its lengthy litigation defuses and sets back social movements. on this point, however, it fails to provide a clear assessment and position. the book is written in a lively and engaging manner. it is definitely an interesting read for lawyers, activists and social scientists. however, the narrative of the book goes back and forth between different time book review: the people’s lawyer | 275 periods and different issues. in addition, it does not adequately address the social, political and legal context that prevailed in the united states at various periods. i would have appreciated a more chronological history coupled with an analysis of whether the ccr’s successes in the 1960s, 1970s and 1980s were byproduct of the social and political turmoil engulfing the united states at that time. this is relevant as one ponders the future of the ccr and the ability to challenge oppressive laws through the courts given the changing social and political environment. the dramatic (and negative) changes in the u.s. justice system have included draconian sentencing, expansion of state surveillance, increased prosecutorial power and particularly diminished judicial authority and oversight. the increase in the power of prosecutors (often at the expense of judges) coupled with draconian sentencing means that the accused (often poor and marginalized) are almost always compelled to accept plea bargains even if they were innocent since the consequences of convictions are severe. about 90% of criminal cases end in plea bargains without trials. recent journalistic articles in the new york times and the washington post paint a very dim picture of the u.s. justice system which is characterized by concealing exculpatory evidence, framing and entrapment, evidence manipulation, incompetent and flawed forensic analysis, and prosecutorial misconduct. as we contemplate the future of progressive organizations such as the ccr, it is important to take into account that the u.s. justice system is becoming increasingly repressive and that it is becoming harder to achieve significant social change through the courts. alternate routes comments by donald swartz when the organizers of this symposium gave me a copy of michael burawoy's stimulating examination of braverman's labour and monopoly capital , i found myself in a quandary as to whether i was expected to address michael's paper or braverman's book. as the time allocated didn't permit me to do both, i have decided to focus on michael's paper as i found some of his arguments quite questionable. my remarks will concentrate on three of burawoy's assertions which are, i believe, central to his critique of braverman. firstly, burawoy argues that the separation of conception and execution is an outcome of the division of labour and the scientific-technical revolution whereas braverman sees it as a consequence of the application of taylorism. secondly, burawoy disputes braverman's view that it was with the development of monopoly capital that it was possible to institutionalize this separation. instead, burawoy advances the periodization of capitalist development which essentially sees taylorism in its failure, giving rise to a scientific and technical revolution. the third assertion, which i will address myself to quite briefly, is burawoy's claim that braverman's analysis is pessimistic, as "he takes for granted the capacity of capitalism to survive class struggles and dismisses them as ineffectual outbursts". burawoy refers us to chapter six, "the habituation of the worker", with the comment "his title mirrors its content". in brief, i'm not persuaded by burawoy's analysis. it is important to note that part of the confusion stems from a certain weakness 26 symposium on braverman in braverman 's treatment of taylorism, which burawoy correctly picks up on. (i'll elaborate on this point in the course of my remarks). in general burawoy' s argument seems based on the view that braverman has not paid proper attention to working-class struggles in the course of american history (and elsewhere, insofar as braverman is talking about the development of monopoly capital generally). specifically, burawoy's analysis rests heavily on worker resistance to taylcrism. burawoy defines taylorism as the specification of task performance. he notes that it certainly gives rise to a management conception of the labour process but precisely because labour power can not be physically separated from labour, workers' conceptual faculties remain. thus burawoy asserts that taylorism simply results in a management as well as a worker's conception of the labour process. effective worker resistance historically to management's attempts to specify task performance means that the separation of conception and execution cannot be identified with taylorism. secondly, building on braverman and marx's argument that technological change is an attempt to increase efficiency and hence surplus value in the face of competition, burawoy argues first that efficiency, not control, is management's prime motive. to equate the two is to assume that taylorism generates efficiency, management knows this, and management has the power to impose taylorism on the work force. burawoy disputes these three assumptions. then, adding that the impetus to technological change can also come from class struggle (i.e: successful wage claims which render labour saving machinery profitable), suggests that taylorism, by intensifying class struggles, spurred the technicalscientific revolution which led to monopoly capitalism. taylorism is to be seen not as the hand-maiden of monopoly capitalism as braverman 27 alternate routes suggests, but as its mid-wife. and of course, the separation of conception and execution is a tendential result of the scientifictechnical revolution and the division of labour. now, it is important not to deny the control that workers exercise both over the method of performing their tasks and the pace at which it is performed, but to see taylorism only as the specification of task performance as burawoy does, is to misconceive, i think, what taylorism and scientific management were all about. as brian palmer has noted, referring to the united states, as late as the progressive era capital still lacked decisive control over the basic processes of work. what this lack of control involved is illustrated very well in the study by katherine stone of steelmaking prior to the homestead strike of 1892, which is an example contrary to many of those cited by montgomery, where the workers were decisively defeated. (among progressive historians seeking to reinterpret u.s. labour history, i think there is probably a tendency to confuse substantial and sustained working class resistance with victory). in essence, prior to that strike, the employers of the steel mills contracted with the unions to produce steel on a rate per ton basis. the organization of the labour process, the division of labour, the pace, manpower requirements, recruitment, wage differentials and training, were determined by the unions virtually unilaterally. quality levels, tools and techniques were substantially controlled by the union as well, and i quote from stone's study: "changes for the improvement of the mill required the consent of mill committees". the ground capital has covered since then is reflected in the public amazement when the postal workers demand the right to veto technological change. the key point here is that the scientific-technical revolution, 28 symposium on braverman just like taylorism, had to confront the control of workers over the production process. taylorism was no mere technique for specifying tasks but an expression of capital's demand for the control labour then exercised over the execution of the labour process; a demand that control rest with its hirelings, not those from whom surplus value was to be extracted. management would assume the responsibility to conceptualize the entire work process, decompose it into constituent task elements each geared to the capacities of "a first-class man", select and train workers to perform these tasks, determine wage rates and differentials based upon task requirements and performance, and control the progress of workers from task to task. in general terms, i am advancing a much more dialectical view of the relationship between conception and execution, and implying that there was a lot of conscious purpose in management's activities and thinking at the time. let us not forget marx's distinction of the human labour process and the way in which animals go about producing on an instinctual basis "--what distinguishes the worst of architects from the best of bees is precisely that the architect conceptualizes his structure in his imagination before he realizes it concretely". it is very important not to get lost in specific scientific management techniques, many of which were as farcical as those peddled by human relations experts today. scientific management, as palmer notes, was part of a general thrust for efficiency, whose proponents despite differences in technique found common ground in the objectives of specialization, standardization and simplification. to these points of consensus it should also be added that job hierarchies, and individual piece-rates (where possible) were also widely advanced to promote competition and individualism. this vertical structure had nothing to 29 alternate routes do with mechanization per se, as burawoy in quoting lukacs seems to imply, but rather was seen as necessary to the realization of surplus value in the context of conflicting objective interests between capital and labour. in taylor's words of earning to bosses preferring rules of thumb to 'scientific management', "when employers herd the men together in classes, pay all of each class the same wages, the only remedy for the men comes in combination". this broader view of taylorism is suggestive of the relationship between it and monopoly capitalism more generally. its implementation meant the development of the management cadre, responsible for conceptualizing the production process, production planning and control, personnel, etc.; in short, a large administrative component. it presupposes a certain scale of production and degree of market control without which taking on the substantial investment is not likely to seem feasible. the significance of the magnitude of the investment is reflected in statistics in the united states which show that between 1899 and 1923, the administrative component of manufacturing industries doubled from less than 8% to 15% of all employees, a tremendous increase in overhead. what i'm suggesting is that the division of labour, taylorism, and the scientific-technical revolution are not easily separable and pcriodizable but rather form a very integrated unity. this idea is reinforced when we consider the specific relationship between the growth of monopoly capitalism and taylorism in the united states. kolko, in his study of the progressive era, points out that the bulk of the merger movement which generated monopoly capitalism, began in the late 1880's and peaked between 1897 and 1901. the date most commonly associated with the beginnings of the movement to establish industrial 30 symposium on bravennan management as a profession subject to scientific laws was 1903, when taylor addressed the american society of mechanical engineers. in other words, when one looks at the timing of the transformation of the structure of industry and one looks at the tremendous growth in all forms of 'scientific management' organizations etc., one sees a very close, indeed inseparable, linkage between the two processes. finally, it is important not to overlook the significance of scientific management as an instrument of the bourgeoisie's struggle for ideological hegemony, by undermining the working class's selfconception and its sense of its own worth, much of which was bound up in the image of the craftsmen. as palmer notes, "called into being by the structural imperatives of the developing industrial capitalism which required to refine the division of labour, 'efficiency' fulfilled another more specific function. in relegating the labouring man and the capitalist to their respective positions in the hierarchy, the new managers buried the populist conception of labour and took a long forceful stride in the direction of lessening working-class autonomy on the shop floor". in a sense (to use one of burawoy's concepts), the whole thrust for efficiency, including scientific management, was directed toward the process of obscuring surplus by suggesting that surplus came not from direct productive labour but rather from the skills and abilities of management. now let me briefly turn to the question of braverman's pessimism. i will confine my remarks to the now-infamous chapter six, whose title in my view does not at all mirror its content. braverman, to me, is talking about the post-taylor evolution in management thought and practices to some extent, which to quote braverman "do not by and large concern themselves with the organization of work but rather with the 31 alternate routes conditions under which the worker may be brought to co-operate in the scheme of work organized by the industrial engineer". braverman begins by overviewing the various subtle manifestations of working class resistance: absenteeism, output restriction, sabotage, as well as overt hostility to management (i.e. strikes). he is derisive in his treatment of management efforts to gain labours' co-operation. in his conclusion he directs our attention not to the apparent acclimatization of the working class but beneath it, to "the hostility of workers to the degenerated forms of work which are forced upon them... this hostility renews itself in new generations, expresses itself in the unbounded cynicism and revulsion which large numbers of workers feel about their work, and comes to the fore repeatedly as a social issue". if anything, such assertions promote optimism (and perhaps even adventurism) . conversely, it is burawoy rather than braverman whom i find pessimistic. his analysis of games of habituation which focusses particularly on surface adaptation of workers to capitalism, it seems to me, contradicts his shouting of class struggle from the rooftops in criticizing braverman. moreover, his conclusion too is pessimistic -in looking to contemporary theories of capitalist crisis and breakdown to jolt labour into revolutionary action. crisis and breakdown are no automatic economic event but presuppose the working class strong enough to counter bourgeois efforts to resolve the contradictions of capitalism at the expense of the working class. without addressing the question of how to build that strength, there will be no revolutionary crisis, but poverty, unemployment, and loss of freedom. and i think, in conclusion, the way to build upon braverman is to build upon the various manifestations of class struggle which are very obviously often individualized, localized, union as opposed to community or 32 symposium on braverman industry or more broadly class-based, and to try to build out of those manifestations an understanding of how to generalize them and how to broaden them into the kind of consciousness which will give the working class the capacity to create the political crisis which may lead us to a new era. -end -33 alternate editorial board: dan gl alternate routes is an a dents in socio, unicatic department subscript: ; | the unite payable to alternate rou' copyright, 1976, alternate routes, unless o vol. 1 contents i977 macrosociological approaches toward a 1 'canadian sociology' wallace clement the dominion government as gatekeeper to the 38 canadian ethnic mosaic, the case of quebec, 1867-1885 dan glenday embourgeoisement or proletarianization? 58 stan marshall social mobility: current thrusts (and non87 thrusts) :a critical approach to the analysis of mobility jan mayer toward a marxist theory of transition 103 chuck smith commentary class analysis and technological determinism 131 ken campbell implications of the domestic role of women 1^2 eileen saunders editorial statement this, is the first issue of a canadian graduate students journal dedicated to the dissemination of theoretical and empirical problems in the disciplines of sociology and anthropology. we have had to rely on our colleagues within the carleton university community due, in part, to our feeling of isolation from other centers of intellectual activity in canada. i believe it can be safely said that we, here at carleton, are not alone in this perception. we hope the publication of this journal will help to 'break the ice"* and in the years to cone contribute to a dialogue between our friends and colleagues, not only in the province of ontario but throughout canada. isbn 0-7709-0012-7 macrosociological approaches toward a 'canadian sociology ' * wallace clement there is an element of truth to the analogy between the blind men and an elephant and the sociologist and a society. this paper is no more than an attempt to move toward a wider perspective, a macrosociological approach to canadian society, by examining some models and theories of modern national societies. it attempts to contribute to the development of what will be called a 'canadian sociology' approach. as a topic of substantive inquiry, canading society needs to be informed by many disciplines, encompassing history, economics, political science (or more generally political economy), social pyschol°gy» social geography, anthropology and sociology. because of its breadth the latter seems suited, more than the others, to encompass each of these disciplines —at least potentially it can. there is little evidence of a general movement in englishspeaking canada toward a 'canadian sociology' approach in the sense of a holistic analysis generated from an understanding of distinctive characteristics, relations and patterns within canada. many approaches have been 'imported', largely by way of the united states, using canada simply as another data source or experimental situation without developing a national society perspective. however, in quebec the situation is exceptional since a 'total society' or societe globale viewpoint is common and the analysis has been indigenous to quebec , thus recognizing the obvious: quebec is not a miniature replica of the united states —something english-speaking counterparts often find hard to comprehend for the rest of canada*. levels of analysis following georges gurvitch, guy rocher suggests three classif icatory levels of analysis: the first is the macrosociological plane of total societies, which includes social groups that are sufficiently complete to satisfy all the needs of their members—such as a country, or western civilization. these groups are considered as wholes or units. the •canada's 'two solitudes' are suggested by guy rocher, "it must be recognized that among many differences, canadian sociology separates clearly into two major categories: frenchlanguage sociology and english-language sociology. they are almost airtight entities. two almost impermeable worlds live side by side in almost total, mutual ignorance" (1974:501). ignorance of the societe glohale perspective used by quebec sociologists has impeded others from developing a perspective on canadian society as a whole while quebec sociologists seldom venture into the res* of canada to apply their perspective, maintaining a somewhat understandable but narrowed inward focus. see also claude gousse's, "reflexions sur l'avenir de la sociologie au quebec" in loubser (editor), 1970. second is the plane of partial groupings which form part of total societies, such as the family, lineal groupings, voluntary associations, social classes, and so forth. finally, there is the microsociological plane of different types of social links... the various social relationships which are established between the members of a collectivity and the different ways in which these members are linked to and by the total society (1972:3-4). these are various points of perception for the analyst but are meant to "interpenetrate" and "link" with one another. for rocher, the macrosociological plane is both the place to begin and end; it is the context for all other investigation and the level towards which all investigation is directed (5). the goal is the "total context" or a holistic analysis.* however, rocher's meaning of macrosociology is much more precise than others. usually macrosociology refers to "largescale social systems and patterns of interrelationships within and between these systems, including, for example, national and international forms of social organization" in contrast to microsociology as "the study of small groups".** thus many of the aspects classified by rocher on the second plane are often referred to as macrosociological, serving to impose a very large gap between macro and micro levels without any mediating levels. for this reason the rocher-gurvitch classification is more useful. classif icatory problems are different from analytical ones. to provide an analysis of canadian society it will be necessary to distinguish three types of macrosociological terms. the first may be called 'macrogroupings ' and corresponds to rocher's second plane and what is usually referred to as macrosociology. the other two aim at a holistic perspective and may be referred to as 'total society' and 'national society' approaches. a 'total society' approximates the first plane identified by rocher in the sense that common social and cultural bonds prevail, as exhibited in common identity, values and traditions, usually carried in a common language and organizations which serve to preserve a particular culture. the conditions for a 'total society' are much stronger than those for a 'national society' in terms of the degree of cultural integra•this approach may be contrasted with a social -psychological one like manzer who turns his analysis towards 'human needs' or the microsociological level (1974:5-22). •*these definitions are provided in george and achilles theodorson's modern dictionary of sociology , thomas y. crowell: new york, 1969. tion evident since the latter is delineated simply by territory and legal-political perimeters commonly referred to as a 'state'. in the former, the degree of social integration is much more important in terms of setting 'boundaries' for analysis while in the latter, the extent of integration within states is left problematic. to demonstrate that a 'national society' is at the same time a 'total society', it would be necessary to show that its members share a common identity, common values and traditions and that these members are bounded by a political-legal state which they command. it may be that in some cases the two coincide at particular historical junctures--although it appears this seldom occurs--wh ile in other cases they do not. this distinction is particularly relevant to canada but elsewhere as well.* the primary defining characteristic of macro units is the scale of their implications for the total society and the scope of their inter-relationships within the total social structure. thus, s.z. klausner has adopted the term "total society", to refer to: an ecologically delimited, more or less interdependent set of human collectivities. the student of a total society could inquire into the spatial and/or organizational interdependence of events. he could report the impact of a society's northern upon its southern region, of its army upon its factories, and of its ethnic groups upon its political parties. the term 'total' indicates an intent to consider all of the people in that particular area (1967:3). as this suggests, what is of central importance is the relationships, or as klausner prefers "links", which mediate between various dimensions. as he says, "a model of a 'total society', while recognizing the distinctness of various theoretical levels, must be concerned with statements which link a term on one level with a term on another" (6) . he remarks that many attempts at 'total society' analysis have failed to specify these 'links' between different aspects and levels. these 'mediating mechanisms* are the critical component for models of 'total societies' because they specify how relationships occur and provide direction to correlations. this parallels the •see, for example, jan szczepanski' s , polish society , where he says, "in the years 1795-1918, poland was a nation without statehood, and, because it lacked its own independent political organization, culture constituted the very basis of national existence ....this distinction must always be kept in mind when dealing with eastern and central europe, where the ethnic and cultural areas have never been the same as the political-state demarcations" (1970:4). jews and israel may be a further example. earlier point by rocher but just as with rocher does not distinguish between a 'total' and 'national' society as two distinct ways of delineating tht-perimeters of study. in canada it may be that les quebecois have a 'total society', as may some english-speaking canadians, but les que becois do not have a 'national society' (although some are striving to achieve this); moreover, it may be that for some the english-speaking 'total society' extends beyond canada as a state into the united states and possibly the west as a whole. these are both empirical propositions which could be explored. language is a problem here because in french, nat ion has the connotation given here to 'total society', as in lord durham's famous caricature of "two nations warring in the bosom of a single state".* the tension between the lack of coincidence between a 'total' and 'national' society in quebec has been one of the major motor forces explaining developments in that society and accounts for many of the reasons why quebec sociologists have been so intimately concerned with this issue. however, in the rest of canada a similar problem has also emerged in the for« of nationalism which attempts to identify a distinctiveness vis 1 vis the united states. the native peoples in canada experience a similar dilemma vis a vis the white world, while there are runblings of similar contradictions between western, eastern and central canada. to th cify focus refer socio note indee the n later does pi ica ter-^s devel final e majo the pa is on red to logy, this d d, the at iona in th not ig t ions of th opment ly, in r dist rticul what earli this oes no exter 1 leve e pape norc t of int e impl s. terms of inction in ar level o may be cal er as a 'n being sai t mean tha nal impact 1 and will r . s i m i 1 a he interna ernal phen ications o leve thi f an led atio d, h t th is rec riy. 1 le omen f th is of s pape alysis the na nal so owever e e x t e crucia eive a a foe vel , e on on e nati analy r, it bein t iona ciety . it rnal 1 to good us on ither the n onal sis , is i g pur 1 lev ' app is im level an un deal the in t ation level befo mpor sued el o roac port can ders of nati erms al 1 for re proceeding tant to spehere. the r what w3s h to macroant to be ignored; tandinc of emphasis onal level of the imevel or in internal 'the distinction between 'total' and 'national' society adds a necessary analytical distinction to macrosociological theory. this problem is pointed to by anthony giddens when he says, "the primary unit of sociological analysis, the sociologists' 'society', in this sense, has never been the isolated, 'internally developing' system which has normally been implied in social theory" (1973:264-265). it is only a 'total society' which is really a 'society' in this sense, yet it too must be placed in the context of other societies which compose its environment. the ultimate level of analysis in macrosociology would be the study of a wide range of total societies and national societies. but it will be argued later that a prerequisite to this is a solid base in a number of national society analyses, and particularly here, to develop such an analysis for canada. a 'sociology of canada 1 and a 'canadian sociology* a 'sociology of canada' is restricted to the level of 'macrogroupings ' at best, and at a microsociological level at worst. on the other hand, a 'canadian sociology' attempts to move between the analytical levels of 'national' and 'total' societies, both of which inform the type of analysis being promoted here, and be informed by a holistic perspective. there have been some recent attempts to develop a 'canadian sociology' approach, an analysis of the enterprise as a whole and the formation of canada as a state, but a variety of 'sociology of canada' perspectives continue to dominate; that is, most sociological studies are of individual aspects of canadian society viewed either in isolation or compared with similar phenomenon elsewhere. each approach is important but essentially different. a 'canadian sociology' focuses on major structural features of the country--such as regionalism, ethnic relations, foreign and indigenous investment patterns, political-legal formations and class structures--as they relate in a national context, especially as they unfold and transform historically. 'canadian sociology' is not a theory about canadian society, although it implies a series of models for organizing information, rather, it is a synoptic perspective which conceptually links together a variety of theories and data on canada while making the analyst aware of other factors which may affect or be affected by the particular aspect of society under study. for example, if the subject under study is education, it would be fruitful to know the linkage this has with immigration and the canadian practice of importing highly qualified manpower rather than creating indigenous educational institutions or the linkage between the type of economy canada has and demands this creates for particular training. similarly, it is important to know the type of class structure canada has if education is to be related to class inequalities or the type of sex roles if it is to be related to sexual inequalities. the point is selfevident. the implication being that there emerges from these linkages a broader understanding of various developments by removing them from a narrow view common to a great deal of sociology. similarly, it is concerned about aggregating data on canada into meaningful units of analysis. all that makes it a ' canad ian sociology' perspective as distinct from a 'japanese, american, polish, british, french, australian, russian, etc. sociology' is the substantive focus. this does not mean that various key features such as regionalism, ethnicity, class, etc. will be identical or even similar in each nation. the similarity is that what is being pursued here is simply a specific case of a more general 'national society' perspective. the key is the holistic analysis of a variety of important social phenomenon within a national context. a 'sociology of canada 1 perspective, on the other hand, focuses on particular aspects of the society, such as those listed above or others like education, immigration, sex roles, deviance, voting patterns, urban studies, etc. but does not relate each to other developments within canada. it may compare them with other countries, a la lipset or alford, but is not essentially concerned about the way they combine, emerge and affect one another. if rocher's point about the macrosociological plane being both the place to begin and end is accepted, then the problematic is the extent to which several 'sociologies of canada 1 could be turned into a 'canadian sociology' by transcending individual studies and relating them to one another.* while the individual models and frameworks used in ' soc iolc gies of canada' do not facilitate this end, the information and theories generated may be able to inform a 'canadian sociology'. the idea of a 'canadian sociology' is not based simply on a series of microsociological or macrogrouping studies or even an enumeration of national statistics, but hinges on the relationships and combinations of various elements which crystallize into a unique whole. rather than dealing with each substantive aspect of canadian society discretely, it attempts to tie them into a total framework on the development, structure and operation of the society. a recent book by ronald manzer, canada: a socio-pol i t ical report (1974), will illustrate the distinction being drawn here. although covering a very wide range of topics and providing abundant empirical data on canada, manzer does not organize his analysis or direct himself to the question of a national society, rather, he tends to deal with a wide range of rather specialized topics without attempting to bring them together in a comprehensive national statement in the way, say, john porter did in the vertical mosaic (1965) where he elaborated relations between *as amitai ltzioni metaphorically points out, it may be "that the study of the trivial fruit fly led to the understanding of some general laws of genet ics .... but just as the anatomy of elephants cannot be studied by dissecting fruit flies, so, too, the morphology of macroscopic social units cannot be effectively explored by studying the structure of small groups" (196r:4r). the themes of class, power and ethnicity within the context of canada as a national society. manzer provides a 'sociolocy of canada', porter a 'canadian sociology'. this is not to sav porter produced the complete analysis of canada as a national society; this probably could never be accomplished in one book (and even if possible, it would certainly become dated). for instance, porter focused his analysis of canada on indigenous national elites and tends to by-pass regional differences which a national framework could have paid more attention to, particularly asking why some regions tend not to produce elites or elites of different types. similarly, he had a tendency to bvpass in some senses the external impact on canada and also overlook the historical specificity of some of the many studies recorded in his book. but what he did do was analyse the interaction between class, power and ethnicity as they form canada's social structure and 'the vertical mosaic'. manzer's report, however, has no real theme or theory about the operation or organization of canadian society.* he provides an evaluation based on the ideals of fraternity, equality and liberty, hut not a national society approach which would be addressed to a total set of conditions explaining why these ideals have not been achieved, if indeed, they are the ideals of canadian society. in this paper there is no attempt to provide a sociology of sociology for canada, nor a survey of sociological findincs themselves. rather, the attempt is to examine a series of models and approaches which may prove useful in developing a 'canadian sociology', particularly those which may expand the analysis of canadian society already provided by porter's pathbreaking work and some issues relevant to such an analysis. but first, a larger context is necessary. macrosociology and the 'classical tradition' macrosociology** focuses on structures, types of relationships, and their degree of dependence or independence; in short, how social systems work***. it is in the tradition of sociolo*for example, in a book of well over 300 pages, manzer devotes less than 10 pages to his introduction and conclusion combined, while his first chapter on "human needs and political goods" has only a passing reference to canada. the remainder of the book is devoted to reporting on important statistical comparisons with other countries. **for a recent discussion of macrosociology, see paul f. lazarsfeld's main trends in sociology . harper & row: ny, 1973:22-36. ***c. wright mills provides a series of questions in his sociol og ical imagination which represent some areas a national society approach could explore: "(1) what is the structure of this par8 gists like marx and weber who attempted, in the words of gerth and mills, "to grasp the interrelations on all institutional orders making up a social structure" (1946:49). but what is meant by 'structure'? a social structure is a stable set of relationships among the various parts or elements making up the totality of a society. however, to say these relationships are stable does not discount their continuous transformation. as z.a. jordan has said in his summary of marx, "macro-sociological structures and laws can claim validity only within a specified period of time and, therefore, must be considered historically" (1971:66). "to analytically 'weave' various institutional orders into a whole from the perspective of national societies requires a historical dimension which seeks to comprehend the interactive effects between different orders, their exchanges—both of decision-makers and resources—and their relative strengths or weaknesses vis a vis each other and different orders. for example, someone examining present-day canada may tend to dismiss the religious order in the overall pattern of power but historically it has had_an enormous effect, particularly in ouebec, but elsewhere as well, in helping to shape the current orders. in quebec it could be argued that the church was important in retarding indigenous capitalism but effective in increasing the power of the strte and unions vis a vis capital. the impact of religion thus could be detected only through a historical analysis.* thus the call for a 'canadian sociology 1 is not meant as a replacement for the 'classical tradition'** in sociology; exticular society as a whole? what are its essential components and how are they related to one another? how does it differ from other varieties of social order? within it, what is the meaning of any particular feature for its continuance and for its chance? (2) where does this society stand in human history? what are the mechanics by which it is changing? what is its place within and its meaning for the development of humanity as a whole? how does any particular feature we are examining affect, and how is it affected by, the historical period in which it moves? and this period—what are its essential features? how does it differ from other period? what are its characteristic ways of history-making? (3) what varieties of men and women now prevail in this society and in this period? and what varieties are coming to prevail? in what ways are they selected and formed, liberated and repressed, made sensitive and blunted? what kinds of 'human nature' are revealed in the conduct and character we observe in this society in this period? and what is the meaning for 'human nature' of each and every feature of the society we are examining?" (1959:6-7). •see hubert cuindon's, "the social evolution of quebec reconsidered" (1964: 154ff) . "for an important collection of some major works in the 'classical tradition' of sociology, see c. wright mills (editor), images actly the opposite. it is the application of classical approaches, such as those used by marx and weber, to macrosociological issues of canadian society. it is within the tradition of 'holistic' analysis which maintains that the whole cannot be reconstructed from the parts; the parts can only be understood in light of the whole. rather than a separate focus on theory and methodology, it calls for a reflexive relationship between theorv and research and the development of sociologies at several levels of analysis, especially as the/ relate to one another, including an understanding of the past, toeling for the present and an eye to the future. a 'canadian sociology' approach is consistent with what irving zeitlin sees as the main task of theory construction, 'a problem oriented approach to social science'. he argues th3t, "if one is generally interested in empirical social systems, one ought to have questions a^out thcii workings that one would like to answer. to do this, oie does n< t begin with 'society' in the abstract but with a specific society (or several of them) and with an interesting problem" (1973:23). one major guiding question t^r a 'canadian sociology' already posed is how do major inequalities such as class, regionalism, ethnicity education, occupation, income distribution, foreign control, etc., affect and reinforce one another? of the few national society studies now available, most seem to present their analysis around a particular theme or euidinc value. ralf dahrendorf writes in 'is society and democracy in germany that "the analysis of total societies requires an attempt to relate the structures of mi=ny specific areas of society to an underlying political problem" (1967:ix). he identifies his problem as follows: good analyses of total c ocieties require... a problem that removes all s'. <*tements from the tedious fog of arbitrariness an i provides the whole with a beginning and an end. tocqueville had a problem of this kind: 'democracy , however, we mean something different from tocque\ille, to wit, liberte rather than 6gal ite , a liberal political community rather than an egalitarian society (viii). there need not bei agreement with the particular problem of liberty chosen by darendorf but few would disagree that this is a of man , george braziller: new york (i960], where he says, "classteal sociology contains an enormous variety of conception, value, and method, and its relevance to the life-ways of the individual and to the ways of history-making in our epoch is obvious and immediate. this is why it is central to contemporary cultural work, and among the most valuable legacies of western civilization" (17) 10 macro level problem and an interesting guiding question. in the vertical mosaic , john porter also uses a guiding, theme, that or* inequal i ty , aimed at the image of a 'middle class society'. similar problems are posed by sol encel in his equal ity and authority: a study of class, status and power in aus tralia ! these are also some of! the types of problems which could be posed by a 'canadian soc iology' --problems not constrained by either theory or methodology, but problems which use theories and methodologies to resolve problems. as c. wright mills has said, "for the classical social scientists, neither method nor theory is an autonomous domain; methods are methods for some range of problems; theories are theories for some range of phenomenon" (1959:121).* the first task of the analyst is to provide the macro problem whether these are liberty, equality, democracy, efficiency or whatever will depend on each researcher's values. as has been argued, one of the most important units of analysis is the nation state within which is encompassed a national society**. within this framework the focus is on major structural components and their relationships as they interact to form the whole. many macro studies have used the nation state as a unit of comparative analysis but this is not the same as analysing a national society. stein rokkan has pointed to what he calls the "whole nation bias" in comparative studies and the weakness inherent in taking aggregates rather than components. he says, "most comparisons have been limited •following this, mills offers some advice to those concerned about substantive problems: "in actual practice, every working social scientist must be his own methodologist and his own theorist, which means only that he must be an intellectual craftsman. every craftsman can of course learn not much more than a general kind of awareness" (1959:121), going on to add that, "the classic focus, in short, is on substantive problems. the character of these problems limits and suggests the methods and the conceptions that are used and how they are used" (128). **a case for using the nation state as the key level of analysis is made by c.w. mills, "in our period, social structures are usuallv organized under a political state. in terms of power, and in many other interesting terms as well, the most inclusive unit of social structure is the nation-state. the nation-state is now the dominating form in world history and, as such, a major fact in the life of every man.... in choosing the national social structure as our generic working unit, we are adopting a suitable level of eenerality: one that enables us to avoid abandoning our problems and yet to include the structural forces obviously involved in many details and troubles of human conduct today. moreover, the choice of national social structures enables us most readily to take ud the 11 to institutional or aggregate statistical data for each nation as a unit and have tended to neglect highly significant variations in the rates of growth among competing economic, political or cultural centres and between such centres and the rural peripheries" (1970:49). in other words, to overcome the "whole nation bias" in comparative studies requires the apriori analysis of the national society which in turn may then be compared in terms of the types of relationships found within the national society and the processes* of developing to this stage. it may seem unusual that a paper on canadian society would have this concern about comparative studies but it is to be understood that each nation has its differences as well as similarities and much can be learned from these. indeed, c. wright mills has noted, "it is only by comparative studies that we can become aware of the absence of certain historical phases from a society, which is often quite essential to understanding its contemporary shape" (1959:157). moreover, it is not merely a theoretical or academic exercise but many canadians themselves engage in just such comparisons—principally with the united states, but with europe and other industrialized nations as well, although typically limiting these to other liberal democracies. aside from the outstanding work of john porter, there are only a handful oi sociologists in english-speaking canada who have taken a total or national society approach--such as, at times, s.d. clark, kasper naegele, a . k. davis and, to some extent, frank vallee and don whyte. but in quebec there are many more, such as hubert guindon, maurice pinard, guy rocher, marcel rioux, jean-charles falardeau, jacques dofny, gerald fortin, phillipe garigue, pioneer quebec sociologist leon geerin and fernand dumont,** to name but a few. as suggested earlier, major issues of public concern, for it is within and between the nation-states of the world that the effective means of power, and hence to a considerable extent of history-making, are now, for better or worse, tightly organized" (1959:135). •john porter has commented, "there is no comparative analysis, for example, when six scholars produce separate papers on the educational systems of six different countries. each study may as well have been published separately rather than bound together since they draw nothing from each other" (1970a: 144). the same, of course, may be said for readers which are called canadian society but lack any internal unity aside from the common subject matter of canada. they might more appropriately be called 'sociologies of canada'. **see especially dumont's, "the systematic study of french-canadian total society" (original, 1962) along with the 14 articles in the section on 'sociological interpretations on the social evolution of french canada', 'economic structure and social stratification 1 and 'social organization and culture' in marcel rioux and yves martin (cds.), french-canadian society (1964). see also nock (1974). 12 however, quebec sociologists have limited themselves to a 'total society' analysis of quebec and have not engaged in a 'national society' analysis of canada. these contributions cannot be minimized because they represent necessary starting points, but their lead must be expanded, elaborated and developed if a reasonable sociological understanding of canadian society is to be achieved. this emphasis, it needs to be stressed, is not parochial. it should be seen as a necessary requisite to national comparative analysis, as rokkan suggested above. ncr should it be abstracted from sociological theories and methodologies developed elsewhere; rather, these should be adapted to the canadian experience, if and when they fit. vallee and whyte, in their paper "canadian society: trends and perspectives", have argued that "sociologists are too busy making up for the backlog of sheer information about canadian society to worry about the enterprise as a whole and to engage in much soul-searching concerning the theoretical and methodological aspects of this enterprise" (1968:849). in terms of the distinction presented earlier, they are arguing that most of what has been occurring is a 'sociology of canada' rather than a 'canadian sociology'. in fact, they argue that, with a few notable exceptions, "canadian sociologists have rarely adopted a holistic perspective, one in which the system-as-a-whole is the universe of study" (849).* this does not mean that every piece of research must cover all aspects of canadian society and address every issue. it does mean that regardless of the particular focus of study--be it ethnicity, regionalism, immigration, class, or whatever--a central question is what this means for the national society, that is, how each part relates to the whole. similarly, it is important to stress again that the focus on a national society suggests that the differences with in society are important as differences between one society and* others. thus ethnic differences, regional splits and class relations within canada go a long way to understanding that society. at the same time aspects such as these cannot be abstracted from an analysis of canada's international context. this means more than simply a 'comparative perspective', which itself is interesting and informative, but an international framework of analysis placing canada's internal developments in the context of external ones. •similarly, a.k. davis argues, "by and large anglophone academic sociology in canada has failed to present a realistic and holis' tic picture of the evolution of canadian society" fl*>7f>:31). 13 some frameworks for the study of national societies* (i) regional power relationship frameworks recently there have emerged some frameworks, developed mainly for latin america's relationship with advanced capitalist nations, based on regional power relationships. these models integrate both national and international dimensions and are built on both a national society and total system perspective. that is, they analyse each nation state in terms of the indigenous regional and class power structures while simultaneously analysing the relationships between these structures and external centers of power. central to all of these models is an unequal relationship between interdependent units which form a set of asymmetrical associations either within national societies or between nation states.** according to andre gunder frank and his 'development of underdevelopment' model, "contemporary underdevelopment is in large part the historical product of past and continuing econ*in the canadian corporate elite (1975:345-353), i d i ?cussed a national society framework which will not be presenttd here, except to say ralph miliband's distinction between the state system and political system suggests a fruitful organizing framework. **barrington moore, jr., although applying an interesting analytical scheme to various societies, is a suoject to a 'large society bias'. he writes, "the fact that smaller countries depend economically and politically on big and powerful ones means that the decisive causes of their politics lie outside their own boundaries. it also means that their political problems are not really comparable to those of larger countries" (1966:xiii). is canada a 'small country' in moore's terms? in some respects, but not in all, nor is it an underdeveloped nation, nor totally politically or economically dependent. but it is also not a 'large country' in international terms. the 'decisive causes' are not totally outside canada and to the extent they are, it is in large part a result of internal policy or non-policy, as the case may be. theda skocpal has made a similar point in her critique of moore, emphasizing the relationship between "intersocietal" and "intrasocietal structures and processes", suggesting his focus is intrasocietal. she writes, "variations of ultimate political outcomes of the modernizing process (moore's dependent variable) are explained by a combination of the strength of the 'commercial impulse' and the type of class structure through which its effects are channeled ... .moore was anxious to establish his cases as societies free from 'foreign influences'. but, of course, no society is free from foreign influences, and, in his case accounts, moore is repeatedly forced to refer to 'external' conditions or events in order to explain 'internal' states or chanc es" ("a critical review of barrington moore's, social origins of dictatorship and democracy", politics and society, vol. 4, no. 1. 1973:28-29). l 14 omic and other relations between the satellite underdeveloped and now developed metropolitan countries" (1969:4). the model is not restricted to international relations; rather, it attempts to link internal developments to relationships within as well as outside of nations, or what he refers to as "a whole chain of constellations of metropoles and satellites" (6). his central hypothesis is that "within this world-embracine metropolis-satellite structure the metropoles tend to develod and the satellites to underdevelop" (9). in other words, there is a chain of exploitive relations between various levels from the local to' the regional to the national and international which serve to accumulate power and resources at the highest levels and drain them from the lowest. johan galtung presents a variation on the themes of prank. he begins, as did frank, by focusing on "inequality within and between nations" and specifically analyses the interactive relations contained therein. the key linking or mediating mechanism he defines as ".coupling" which means "some type of social causation in interaction relations and interaction structure" (1971:83). using the imagery of 'center' and 'periphery'*, galtung argues "there is a disharmony of interest between the center nation [metropolitan nationj as a whole and the periphery nation [satellite nationj as a whole" but maintains that this misses an important refinement "because it blurs the harmony of interest between the two centers, and leads to the belief that imperialism is merely an international relationship, not a combination of intraand inter-national relations" (84). the key mediating party in the galtung model is the "bridgehead" in the center of the periphery nation. inequality results from the way interaction takes place and can be identified in terms of sets of elites. in what he calls the "multinational, asymmetric stage", galtung argues, "elites have emerged in the periphery nations, strongly identified with and well harmonizing with the center elites" (96). one final refinement galtung introduces has particular relevance to canada and that is the 'go-between' status of some nations, mediating between center and periphery nations in much the same way the center in the periphery nation mediates in the general model (104) because of the type of imagery used, a problem with the regional power structure models is their emphasis on geographical distinctions rather than class distinctions; for example, the bourgeoisie may be located in metropolitan areas but so is much of the proletariat. while keeping the overall perspective •the terms 'periphery' and 'center' as images of international economic relations have been used since at least 1949 by raul prebish in his the economic development of latin america and its principal probl erns" ]j siew york , united nations department of social and economic affairs, 1950:1 (original published in spanish in 1949). 15 of international relationships and their intra-nat ional implications, recent analysts have paid much more attention to the class structures within these nations and have argued that some elements of these class structures have become ' internationalized' . these types of analyses norman girvan has classified as "historical/ institutional/structural" approaches.* the most impressive example of such an approach is the work of osvaldo sunkel in "transnational capitalism and national disintegration in latin america". using five inter-related concepts of "development, underdevelopment, dependence, marginality and spatial imbalances", sunkel argues: a realistic analysis of latin america development should therefore be based on a conception which assumes our socio-economic system to be formed by two groups of structural elements: internal and external. among the internal factors are: the pattern of natural resources and population; political institutions, especially the state; sociopolitical groups and classes; the ideologies and attitudes of different groups and classes; the specific policies followed by the government; etc. the complex of internal and external structural elements, and the interrelations among them, define the structure of the system, and constitute, therefore, the framework within which the functioning of the national system and its processes of structural transformations take place (1973:135). more specifically, there are three dimensions of the analysis-' process, structure and system--whereby "it is postulated that underdevelopment is part and parcel of the historical process of global development of the international svstem, and therefore, that underdevelopment and development are simply two faces of one single universal process" (135-136). the most recent phase in these relationships maintains the overall structural asymmetry between nations but now that they have become "ever more closely integrated— it is necessary to take into account that this new model of international economic relations is based operationally on the transnational conglomerate, a new kind of business organization that has experienced an enormous growth during the last decades" (139). there now appears an "internationalized" sector in both the center and periphery nations built on the institution of the multinational corporation. for the periphery nation this likely means that "international mobility will correspond to the internal •for an important overview of the types of analysis which have been performed in third world countries, see girvan's, "the development of dependency f.conomics in the caribbean and latin america: review and comparison", social and economic studies , vol. 22, no. 1 (1973: 1-33) . 16 nobility particularly between the internationalized sectors of developed and under-developed countries, which, as we have indicated before, constitute the nucleus of the international capitalist system, and, therefore, probably also constitutes an international market for skilled resources" (170). sunkel's model thus focuses on developments within center and periphery nations but, in addition, adds an international category because of his 'global perspective'. from this wider perspective, analogous with the continental system between canada and the united states, two basic components can be identified: a) a complex of activities, social groups and regions in different countries which conform to the develooed part of the global system and which are closely linked transnationally through many concrete interests as well as by similar styles, ways and levels of living and cultural affinities; b) a national complement of activities, social groups and regions partially or totally excluded from the national developed part of the global system and without any links with similar activities, groups and regions of other countries (146) . thus the imagery used by sunkel is of a "transnational kernel or nucleus" at the "heart" of the international system which tends to be integrated plus national segments which tend to be "segregated or marginal" to the core of the dominant national and international system. the importance of these segregated sectors in both the center and periphery is their relationship with the transnational integrated sectors in terms of the types of demands they may make and conflicts which may occur. it is important to recognize that in sunkel's model class relationships are of crucial importance but do not correspond to the ' integrated-marginalized ' dichotomy. rather, there is a 'core' of international capitalism into which some segments of the periphery bourgeoisie, middle class and a portion of the working class or even agricultural classes are incorporated while some parts of all classes are marginalized. there is still an overall international hierarchy between nations based on an asymmetrical relationship but above this is an integrated multinational segment 'transcending' this in an international capitalist system. the effect of integrating galtung's idea of 'go-between' nations with sunkel's 'integrated and marginalized' segments of the class structures of center and periphery nations means that a rather integrate model of international and internal economic relations could be developed. mediating between the various structural components of the model would be the institution of the multinational corporation and the elites who control them 17 and others who work for them. to turn this general model into a theory of international and regional capitalism would require a great deal of empirical work but as a guide to this system requires a model somewhat more developed than that for latin american nations because of canada's unique role of mediator for foreign controlled capital plus its own foreign investment and the extensive foreign investment within canada itself.* although there has been some discussion of various regional power structure frameworks within canada, very little empirical work has actually been done. what has been undertaken is at the level of the frank 'development of underdevelopment' thesis and not in terms of more recent models such as c-altune's or sunkel's. mel watkins, for instance, suggests using a "center-margin framework" similar to frank's model for examining the national bourgeoisie and "its relationship of dependency or independence with respect to the imperial business class or the imperial bourgeoisie" (1970:35). in so doing, he recognizes the importance of the "metropolis-satellite chian" used by frank (37-39), arguing that in the international framework, "canada would lie above the line as one of the exnloiting nations rather than an exploited nation" (40). but at the same time the internal relationships must also be taken into account and it is in this context that arthur k. davis' paper, "caradian society and history as hinterland versus metropolis" (1971), is important**. however, these humble beginnings have led to very little in the way of model building or theories, not to mention the absence of empirical research. while this is somewhat better in the case of regional analysis within canada, there is virtually nothing published about the continental context . *** •see wallace clement, "the canadian bourgeoise: merely comprador?", a paper presented at the marxist study institute, toronto, feb., 1975 and the section on "absentee ownership and 'linkages'" at the end of the next section. **the importance of the boundaries selected for study is also noted by keyfitz when he writes, "if we study any institution in canada, for example, trade unions or an automobile plant, our conclusions will come out one way if we treat it as autonomous, as though anv links with the united states can be disregarded, and another way if we treat it as part of a larger continental entity" (1974:34). ***to comprehend the nature of the relationship between canada and the united states at any given time, it is necessary to understand what is happening within each. milner and milner are amonc the few who have actually practiced this, writing, "the united states behaves toward other nations in ways which are to a great extent a reflection and outgrowth of the economic structures and social system inside its borders... in order to understand many of the most important aspects of everyday experience in quebec, we must understand 18 these frameworks have a particular promise for canadian social science as models because they reflect a centralist tradition important in canada's development, particularly in terms of its early colonial links and the early development of central canada as exemplified in innis's staple theory and the lower/creighton 'laurentian thesis'. each has been built on an analysis of structural power links binding them into a whole founded on geography, regionalism, and resource extraction. one of the differences between most elite models, such as that used by john porter in the vertical mosaic , and the regional power structure frameworks outlined here is the force of opposition built into the latter. they see the relationship as one of running conflict whereby canadians are placed in a 'doublebind' between the united states and canadian business interests, both of whom have turned toward the regional hinterlands for their surplus extraction. replicated in canada are the beginnings of a model of a national society in its international context.* although these have not as yet been developed sufficiently or applied adequately to canadian society, there are clearly beginnings in this direction. many more specifications are required in such a model, some of which are suggested in the international models, before it can address some particular characteristics of canadian society. it would seem important to specify more clearlv the dimensions such as regionalism, class or ethnicity being analysed and recognizing some of the differences and clusterings which may occur. for instance, there may be an important difference in french-english relations with respect to the economic domain as compared to the state. indeed, this has recently been shown to be the case (clement and olsen, 19741. also, the links between various levels must be more clearly specified and the mechanisms of mediation examined more carefully. furthermore, the relationships between the various 'parties' in both the 'center' and 'periphery' must be examined more thoroughly. this means, for instance, examining relations based on economic and state power in terms of the ethnicity of the power holders and their regional location. it may be that there is uniformity within the 'center' but diversity in the •periphery' which affects the types of resistences davis suggests should exist. finally, the international dimension must be explored more thoroughly for the internal implications of some of the crucial facts of life in the united states--beg inning with its internal class structure and the culture which sustains this structure" (1973:9). •while the international context has been stressed here, internal relations can also be examined within this model. for example, frank vallee notes, "one cannot understand situations and trends among the native people without taking into account the nonnative people who form part of the social environment" (1171:149) 19 these structures. these preliminary points arising from various regional power structure models may prove useful in the attempt to develop a 'canadian sociology' . they would clearly allay any criticism of such an undertaking as parochial. indeed, they would bring the analysis of canada into an international framework in a more meaningful fashion than could anv series of 'sociologies of canada'--or traditional comparative studies—because they demand that relations between various institutions in canada and other national societies be specified, not simply as they compare. for example, rather than comnaring political, judicia], economic, or educational institutions and policies in 'canada, the united states and the united kingdom, the researcher would ask what implications the institutions and policies of one nation have for others--both in terms of models that have been adapted after being established in one place as well as the impact of policies and institutions from other nations and their implications for the nation under study*. some of these questions will be returned to later but first the consociational democracy model will be examined. (ii) consociational democracy there has been an attempt to present a model of certain types of nationa*. societies characterized as 'segmented' in terms of ethnicity, religion, language, or political .tructure. this approach has been presented and applied specifically to canada and other nations in a collection of papers edited by kenneth mcrae, consociational democracy: political accomoda tion in segmented societies (1974). although variously called "segmented plural ism" , and "contradictarian democracy", mcrae suggests that the term "consociational democracy' is most convenient (3-4) . he distinguishes three perspectives in the general consociational literature: 1) as a pattern of social structure, emphasizing the degree of religious, ideological, cultural or linguistic segmentation in the society itself; 2) as a pattern of elite behavior and mass-elite relationships emphasizing the processes of decision-making and conflict regulation; 3) as an underlying characteristic of the political culture arising from historical circumstances that may antedate the period of mass politics (5) . mcrae* s summary of the literature suggests that one element stands out as most important and is a prerequisite for a society being 'on the relationship between 'endogenous' and 'outside* factors on development, see giddens (1973:265). 20 considered consociat ional ; he says, "the cleavage in question should be sufficiently intensive and durable to rive members of the respective groups a distinctive and persistent outlook or cultural orientation that is different from that of other sectors, a raison d'etre for maintaining organized segmentation" (6). underlying the entire model, but not made explicit, is the assumption that these cleavages will become organized and be manifest in the political system so as to stabilize the society as a whole. this is apparent, for example, in lijphart's definition: "consoc iat ional democracy means government by elite cartel designed to turn a democracy with a fragmented political culture into a stable democracy" (1974:79). while the model explicitly deals with cleavages based on regional, religious, linguistic and ideological splits, it does not attempt to incorporate social classes as possible subcultures. similarly, the consociat ional model stresses the role of the political system but does not take into account others such as the bureaucratic, economic, labour, or mass media in terms of representing population segments. mcrae has made a cautioned application of the consociat ional model to canada, albeit limited to the political system hecause of the bias contained within the general model. his main findings are that, "the primary lines of segmentation in canada are difficult to identify with precision on account of (.sicj the reinforcing but not completely overlapping effects of province, language and religion", especially because there is not one government in canada but eleven, including the provinces and federal government thus creating a "distorting forum" for the segments. using a comparative method to place canada's segmentation in a relative position to 'classic' segmented societies, the results are "inconclusive" since "by any of these criteria province, religion and language canada must he ranked significantly lower". probably most significant, given the political orientation of the model, is his finding that "because of the nature of the party system and the electoral system, modern political parties in canada have not divided alon^ any of the axes of subcultural cleavage—accommodations between subcultures must take place within the governing party" (260-261). while there may be some resemblance between canada and the consociational model, it does not adequately explain developments even within the political system. some of the preconditions for the development of a consociat ional political system mav in fact exist but they have not become organized and represented in the political system in the way the consociat ional model suggests. in his book, elite accommodation in canadian politics (1973), robert presthus has adopted a consoc iat ional approach , part icularly as developed by lijphart. his use of the model, however, is more metaphoric than real because he adapts it to the study of interest groups rather than the study of cleavages based on so21 cial segments. in fact, what he does abstract from the general model are those elements related to "elite accommodation" as "an integral part of the larger process of national integration" (4). this is simply another way of saying "elite pluralism" (see bachrach, 1967). but what is made quite explicit in presthus' analysis is that he regards this not only as a desirable way to organize a 'democratic' society but as the only way. he says, "elite accommodation may be regarded as a structural requisite of any democratic society in which political decisions are the result of negotiation and consultation among the elites concerned ... -.el ite accommodation is inherent in the process of democratic government" (4). while presthus' account of "elite accommodation" may be an interesting ideology* as a "way to overcome pervasive modern schisms between labour and capital, social classes, and indeed, between government and the governed" (25), it is not an adequate base upon which to build a theory or model of the way canadian society operates. it is subject to the same limitations mcrae pointed out for the consociational model and confines the analysis to the role of the state system, virtually ignoring the operation of other power domains in the society and not providing any insight into such issues as regionalism or class structures.** while the consociational model does not address sufficient issues necessary to develop a 'canadian sociology' it does provide at least some potential in terms of the two major segments of canadian society. these are the 'two nations' of french and english canada. language, religion, political units and regional centralization are all elements serving to reinforce this major cleavage, as is economic position and, at least to some extent, political parties with the liberals dominant in quebec and the conservatives and ndp almost totally absent. however, the issue of social class is not integrated in the model and for this it is necessary to turn to a long standing debate over the place of the concepts 'class 1, 'nation' and 'ethnicity' in canadian society. (iii) the problems of class, nation and ethnicity*** although the theoretical debate has been centered mainly in quebec, the issue has relevance for all of canadian society, *see, for example, w.l. mackenzie king's, industry and humanity . macmillan: toronto, 1913. **in a highly critical reveiw of the book, john meisel has noted that presthus introduces the idea of elite accommodation but fails to integrate it, saying, "the book makes only a marginal contribution to this still open issue", canadian forum , may-june, 1974:44-46. ***this question will be discussed again shortly in terms of dominant issues in canadian society. hubert guindon's work, especially "two cultures: an essay on nationalism, class, and ethnic tension" (1968), as john porter's extensive analysis has demonstrated. bourque and laurin-frer.ette h3ve analysed the relation between the concents 'class' and 'nation' within quebec, raintaining that "a diversified class structure has existed within the two nations present in quebec's social format ion ... the stri-.ctuve <'.oes not prevent, on the one hand, the collaboration between the elates whose members are in the main from different nations, and on the other hand, the class struggle, within e^ch nation". while they see the two concepts as related they are by no means identical, nor should they be merged into such hvbrids as 'ethnicclass'. they define and analyse the concepts as fellows: an ethnic group forming a single dominated social class cannot therefore constitute a nation. we can only analyse it as a social class within the social formation and, in the case of the capitalist mode of production, the nation to which it belongs. in the case of an ethnically differentiated class, the ethnic character may be the vestigial result of another social formation; an earlier social formation in the case oi conquest; another nation, where large-scale emigration is involved (1972: 192) . the distinction _s put more simply by stanlev p.yerson when he says, "the concepts of class anil nation are not equatable. classes enbody relationships of property and work, in the context of a mode of product ion .. .nat ion-communi ty embodies an identity linguistic and cultural, that is not simply an 'effect' of class, however closely its evolution may he interwoven with the shifting patterns of class relations" (1972 : 224 ) . for some time now, quebec sociologists have been relating the issues of class and nation to a total society analysis. more than other sociologists in canada, they have ilso given a 'richer' meaning to the concept of class.* this can be seen, for exairple, in the use given the term by dofny and xioux: on the role of the middle class in french canada is a total society analysis which takes into account its larger context and the interplay between 'class' and 'nation'. tie clearly relates class developments and political movements within the context of ethnic differentiation. see also maurice pinard's paper on this topic, "working class politics: an interpretation of the quebec case", canadian review of sociology and anthropology , vol. 7, no. 2 (may 1970) . •contrast dofnv and rioux with porter's use of class (1965:9:s). 23 the concept of social class is intrinsically related to the concept of 'total society'; unless social and cultural phenomena are placed in the context of the total society, there is the risk of confusing social classes with groups based on occupation or socio-economic interests ... .social classes are very large groups, real rather than nominal, that appear in those societies where the economic structure predominates and determines the congruence between the other sub-systems of the society. these groups we call -social classes are mainly differentiated according to economic inequalities. social classes appear in heterogeneous societies and tend to form subcultures, in other words, cultural systems which are relatively coherent (1964:307-308). later dofny and rioux raise the problem of the "truncated" nature of the class system in quebec, a problem also raised by rocher when he speaks of "a double system of classes, permeating each other at certain leve'ls, but relatively autonomous in relation to each other" (1964:336). while porter is generally noted for his 'nominal' use of the term class, it is apparent in the following comment on quebec that he iz using the term as more than statistical categories. he says, "because british and french live as largely separate groups there are two class systems, each bearing the stamp of its own culture. both french and british have their old aristocratic families as well as their lower classes. however, these two class systems while operating side by side are also firmly interlocked in the economic system" (1165:91). unfortunately, there has not been a major attempt to provide a class analysis for the national society in the way this has been done for quebec. leo johnson's article (1972) is the closest there is to analysing classes as large, active groups on a national scale. this may be because they are not real or associational groups on this level but research has not been done to either confirm or deny this. aside from their importance in terms of 'class' and 'nation' , what is important in the way these concepts have been related analytically is the use of a historical perspective. this is particularly true for bourque and laurin-frenette, ryerson and guindon, but is also evident in porter, who says, "to understand the interplay between ethnic inequalities and class inequalities it is important to look at how ethnic differentiation within a society develops. in most historical instances it has been through conquest or migration" (1974:5). porter differs from others mentioned in one other important respect; he analyses the relationship between 'ethnicity' and 'class' 2k rather than 'nation' and 'class'.* this allows him to deal more broadly with canadian society as a whole because it extends the analysis to cover 'third' ethnic groups, representing about one quarter of the canadian population. a recent book by david hughes and evelyn kallen, the ana tomy of racism: canadian dimensions (1974), has expanded^ trie study of ethnicity well beyond earlier attempts. although they begin with one central problem, that of racism in canada, they expand their analysis to include a wide range of inter-related phenomenon, such as conquest, immigration, individual, institutional and structural racism, ethnic group boundaries, the role of education, religion and language, and the effect of state policies, as they affect and are affected by their central problem. of particular note is the way they are able to relate ethnicity and power, privilege and prestige in canada in a wav not evident since the vertical mosaic . hughes and kallen systematically deal with many problems at the core of a 'canadian sociology' by searching out the linkage between inequalities in each of these phenomenon. thus there are two fairly distinct issues; one concerning the place of quebec in confederation and another the relationship between class and other relatively fragmented eihnic eroups the first may be analysed in terms of conquest; the second is better understood in terms of selective migration and other factors . to summarize this discussion before examining some dominant issues in canadian society, it may be said that there is much that is suggestive in regional power struggle models, the consoc iat ional democracy model and the "class ''nation' distinction but they have not been developed into what could be called a model of canadian society. a number of sub-theories or models are available in the literature but they have not been brought together into a coherent and comprehensive 'canadian sociology ' . some issues in canadian society the preceding sections have discussed the idea of a 'canadian sociology' and some approaches which may prove useful in the attempt to develop this perspective. this final section will provide a few dominant issues (for illustrative purposes) which could be addressed in such an undertaking. the conclusion will provide some suggestions about how these issues could be related and expanded. •on the relationship between ethnicity, cultural groups and territory, see hughes and kallen (1974:88). (i) national identity and the social psychology of canadians the literature in canadian sociology on 'national identity 1 is probably more extensive than on any other single tonic*, particularly one at the national level, yet little consensus has emerged in terms of what this means in canada or -hat it? implications are for a 'canadian sociology'. some have argued canada is conservative because of its 'tory' origins and reiection of the american revolution, others that it is liberal because of its american orientation, still others that canadians are engaged in a love-hate relation with themselves and the united states. whatever the case may be, the 'national character 1 route to understanding canadian society seems a 'dead end' not a place to begin but a place to arrive. the onlv conclusion seems to be that there are a number of social forces affecting the way canadians act and believe. it seer.s -nore reasonable to first identify these social forces and the", address the consequences for the canadian consciousness. one of these social forces is ethnic diversity, the struggle between the french and english plus the ethnic pluralism of the other one quarter of the population. in the absence of alternative identities, the canadian state has pursued policies of ' biculturalism ' , and more recently, 'mult icul tural i? v , which serve to reinforce these atomized 'organized' mir orities . ' it is difficult to tell if these are identities arisinc from the canadian 'mosaic' or ideologies projected by the canadian state elite (see clement and olsen, 1974). sociologists themselves are not free from responsibility on this matter, as vallee and whyte have said: sociologists who have written on national character and values in canada have based their conclusions on impressions, introspection, and on inferences from such disparate sources as literature, historical developments, and statistics on a variety of subjects. the framework within which these studies are carried out and presented is almost always a comparative one in which canadians are •see, for example, kasper naegele (1968); s.d. clark (1974); george grant (1965); mildred schwartz (1967); j. m.s. careless (1969); john porter (1967, 1971, 1974); g. horowitz (1971); s. m. lipset (1964, 1971); don whyte (1973). ••examining the consequences of these policies porter says, "it really seems questionable that we seek our psychic shelters through ethnic identification. there is no doubt that ethnic groupings can play this role, but at the cost of perpetuating ethnic stratification" (1974:10). 26 viewed as not quite as american as the americans, not quite as british as the british, not quite as australian as the australians, not quite as french as the french. in this way, sociologists reinforce a folk impression of long standing that canada is a hyhrid product arid an intermediary between the united states and europe (1968:836). religion, ethnicity, linguistic groups, class, sex and region all compete with a sense of national identity but it seems an understanding of how and why these operate can best follow from the studv of the structure of canadian society. a study of regionalism using the framework outlined earlier would suggest some of the reasons why there are several identity references operating simultaneously. in the west, for example, there is one pull to central canada and another north-south pull to the united states. nations need not be monolithic or highly integrated; indeed, precisely the way the parts (be they ethnic, regional, class, etc.) relate to the whole is one of the most important and interesting variables. only very recently with the appearance of patricia marchak ' s ideological persp e ctive on canada has the weakness of the 'canadian character literature begun to be overcome an j this has been done by using a methodology different from the earlier studies. she has chosen to do her macrosocioloi;v of canada by counterposi ng "two versions of the canadian reality" --dominant and counter ideologies (1975:viff). the method is to contrast ideology and reality and see why some classes adopt one or another, and evaluate which 'fits' an understanding of canadian society. marchak is able to weave an analysis of history, class, nation, foreign ownership, sovereignty, regionalism, french canada, ethnicity, native peoples, sexual inequality, professions, unions, political parties, institutional arrangements--publ ic and private, education, wealth and income distribution into her theme of dominant and counter ideologies, and this is all done at the national society level. although they are not as yet related in such a way that it could be said that they constitute a model or theory of canadian society, the beginnings of such an attempt are apparent. an analysis using the regional power structure discussed earlier which attempted to integrate the findings of rex lucas' study, minetown, milltown, kail town , john porter's study of the national power structure anh other work on the international level* is another approach worth exploring. the number of such 'in a paper, "econfomic elites in ontario: a broader perspective on regionalism" (presented to the canadian studies institute, university of waterloo, november, l (->74), i attempted to show the linkages between the local, regional, national and international levels. this approach is particularly useful for illustrating the implications of broader powei structures on the day to day activitites of canal ians. 27 links as education, corporate control, regionalism, urban-rural migration, social mobility, unions anil others, are innumerable.* a study which tried to examine national identities based on these types of linkages would probably have more to say about how people develop 'identities' than those undertaken within the 'national identity' approach thus far. indeed, studies such as the impressive work of lucas have done a great deal to link the social psychological level of analysis into broader social forces and structures. it is likely that studies such as his or marchak's would be the primary way that a 'canadian sociology' approach could tap this level of analysis yet still retain its broad national focus. (ii) french canada as a hinterland model it was mentioned earlier that hubert guindon's analysis of french canada provides an analysis of a total society which could be expanded to the whole of canada. guindon links the "increase in the political and economic relevance of the provincial governments at the expense of the federal government" to changes which have occurred in the class structure of quebec (1968:33ff). this could also be related to postwar transformations in the prairies, particularly oil in alber*a, which have catalysed ;.imilar developments there.** althougi all of the parallels and points of analysis cannot be developed here, it is worthwhile to suggest some of the more obvious. guindon says, the vulnerability of the traditional elite set the stage for an easy introduction of industrialization even if it meant dependence on foreign capitalists. the capitalists transformed the french canadians into urban dwellers. to service the needs of the recently urbanized masses, the traditional power elite had to transform its institutions into large scale bureaucracies, giving birth in the process to the new middle class of french-canadian society (44). in these few sentences guindon has introduced and integrated a historical framework for the study of industrialization, bureaucratization, foreign investment, class transformations and the study of elites. later he discusses social mobility, saying, "french-canadian bureaucratic pyramids have a narrow base --geographically, socially, and organizat ionally--because of their small scale. this means that upward mobility is more re•these linkages will be returned to in the final section. *see john barr and owen anderson (editors), the unfinished revolt , mcclelland and stewart: toronto, 1971. stricted, less diversified, and less extended" (51). all of this resembles closely the experience of other regional hinterlands in canada.* it places the analysis within its canadian and international context, shows the limitations of attempting to create parallel mobility structures alongside dominant ones (and the need to do this because of exclusion from dominant ones) it explains the role local elites have in mediating with outside rower centers and where their interests are located. vallee and whyte have commented: compared to the total canadian nation-state, the distinctive entity called french-canadian societv is easy to grasp in its totality. the inter-dependence of the parts that make up the socio-political entity called quebec can be traced historically and synchronical ly in a way which it would be extremelv difficult to do for canada as a whole, except at the most abstract level (1968:850). perhaps it is not so much the size or complexity of canadian societv as the lack of attempting to develop such an approach anong english-speaking sociologists that explains this failure. surely the same ;ind of analysis can be done for the rest of canada; it even has the model of such analyses as guindon's to start with. . absentee ownership and 'linkages' since i have discussed the international setting of canada's economy elsewhere in "the changing structure of the canadian economy" (1974), only a few aspects of national level absentee ownership will be provided for illustrative purposes of some of the 'linkages' necessary to develop a 'canadian sociology'. canada's economy has two types of elites, comprador and indigenous, which are centered in relatively distinct economic sectors. the '.dor elites are the canadian counterpart of foreign controlled multinationals. in terms of the galtung model, they are the 'go-between' elites in the periphery nation. some modifications to this model are necessary because, in addition to the comprador or 'go-between' economic elites, there exist independent indigenous elites. aside from this amendment, the fragmented economic system in canada can be related to the fragmented political system, particularly in the context of the above re*the case studies of philip mathias', forced growth , james lewis and samuel: toronto, 1971 are interesting illustrations. all five cases are located within the weakest provinces. see also garth stevenson, "continental integration and canadian unity" in andrew airline, et al, editors, continental community ?, mcclelland and stewart: toronto, 1974. 29 marks on the relationship between foreign investment and regional hinterlands. that is, the fragmented political system has encouraged the development of foreign direct investment within various provinces which compete with each other thus encouraging differential patterns of growth between provinces and higher rates of foreign investment. this, in turn, has resulted in an increase in provincial power in the postwar period, particularly in the oil rich prairies, which has also weakened the federal system. these brief remarks suggest that it is important to establish relationships between various developments a*nd places them within their international context. absentee ownership on the national level has had important economic, political and regional implications but these represent only one side of the relationship. if the full implications for a 'canadian sociology' are to be explored, then other aspects must also be taken into account. absentee ownership may be defined in terms of the distance from a particular center, similar to the metropolis-hinterland chain discussed earlier. the boundaries under consideration must be specified; for example, at the national level foreign ownership is absentee and the economic boundaries do not coincide with the nation state. on the community or regional level, absentee ownership refers to the branches of firms which are not locally owned but are part of larger corporations, themselves either canadian or foreign owned. the consequences of foreign ownership at the national level and local level exhibit similar characteristics, including lack of autonomy from outside control and decision-making, withdrawal of capital and resources, as well as a higher degree of uncertainty about the continuation of the branch plant at both levels since by definition they are peripheral to the overall operation. another consequence of importance is the effect on the class structure and mobility of the indigenous population, either local or national. with a branch plant system, management is typically recruited outside the community and frequently transferred thus creating a system of 'transient managers'. this means local people have a lower probability of upward mobility and participation within this type of structure. on the national level the matter is more complex. if management is brought in from outside, as has often been the case in the past, the opportunity structure for indigneous canadians is blocked. however, if foreign firms recruit within canada to fill these positions, this opens the possibility for middle class canadians who are university educated. given the high degree of blockage which occurs within canadian controlled firms, this may be desirable from the perspective of individual mobility, but must be weighted against other consequences of absentee ownership suggested above plus the fact that this may be a way that indigenous entrepreneurial talent is drained off within canada, thus inhibiting the creation of indigneously controlled activity. 30 in some respects it does make a difference whether the absentee owners are canadian or foreign. these would be with respect to the retention of profits within canada which could be used to expand industrial activity thus creating greater surplus and more jobs. it would also mean that many of the secondary and tertiary spin-offs such as technological development could be supported and encouraged within canada. being based within canada may also mean the firms would be subject to greater regulation by the canadian state. in other respects it makes little difference whether the branch plant is canadian or foreign controlled, particularly for the regional or local level. in either case the major access points to occupational mobility, the major accumulation of surplus, and the sources of decision-making, occur outside the area. the community or region within which the branch plant is located is equally vulnerable to decisions taken at head office, be it in toronto or new york. this discussion is the result of taking several levels of analysis such as the local or regional level represented by rex lucas' minetown, mill town , rail town , john porter's analysis of national economic elites and tying them all together in a variation of regional power structure model. while tnis discussion is very brief and only illustrative, as well as being confined mainly to economic dimensions, it does provide some indication of the type of analysis that could be developed into a national society framework. the key analytical points are in the linking mechanisms between each level and a concern with the entire scope of the society, including the frequently missing local level. several other types of analyses could be provided which link external and internal developments; for example, the relationship between immigration and retaining a french-speaking population base for the purposes of political power as evident in the recent bill 22 controversy in quebec or the relationship between foreign control of industry, the occupational structure of the labour force and the implications this has for postindust rial ism. while these cannot be developed here, they give some indication of other types of studies which could be related to a national society analysis. conclusion the future of canadian sociology will depend upon its keepin? up with current trends and being able to place them within the context of the national society. in canada there is a double dilemma of trying to catch up empirically and theoretically by developing the basis for a 'canadian sociology' while at the sane time staying abreast of current developments and remaining relevant. moreover, there are many areas that have been almost totally neglected, not only in a substantive sense hut in the sense of the types of perspectives used in the analysis. for 31 example, there has never been in canada a macrosoc iological approach by a marxist on the scale of, say, charles ii. anderson (1974) for the united states, although elements of such an analysis exist such as leo .johnson (1972) on the decline of the petite bourgeoisie or in some respects davis' metropolishinterland analysis (1971) following the town-country dichotonv in marx. more work needs to be done even with existing studies. for instance, an important undertaking would be tying the analysis of class, power and elites together empirically; put crudely, this means tying part i of the vertical mosaic , 'the structure of class", into part ii, 'the structure of power', by maintaining the national perspective and adding an historical analvsis. there do exist a number of theories, models or at least themes about the nature of canadian society, some of which have already been mentioned. porter, for instance, has identified the relationship between class, power and ethnicity, and this has now been expanded by hughes and kallen; a.k. davis' hinterland-metropolis relationship based on regional inequalities; a. richmond's relationship between immigration and ethnic inequalities, following, in part, from porter's 'two stream model' of migration; leo johnson's changing occupational structure and the decline of the petite bourgeoisie; pat marchak's two competing versions of social reality; and i have suggested the relationship between foreign and indigneous economic development . together, and with others, it may be possible to form these into a 'canadian sociology 1 . social life is highly complex and experiments in types of societies have been varied. the task of social studies is to 'make sense 1 out of the variety of experiences and experimentations by identifying major processes, structures and relationships. therefore, the study of canadian society can and should be approached from a number of perspectives, using a variety of methodologies and data sources. but ultimately, to have relevance for the study of the national society, they have to be tied into an overriding framework and presumably be aimed at a common concern--such as improving the lot of canadians, which could mean being concerned about the decline of inequalities of all sorts and the increase and redistribution of the society's resources. it has been argued that the focus of a 'canadian sociology' should be on an array of substantive problems in canadian society but these in turn must also be worked out in terms of the priorities of each researcher. this means an evaluation of what are considered important or significant social issues and concerns, an analysis of them and reporting these results. the process of reporting to other scholars and the public is intended to have others re-examine what they consider to be social issues and to re-order their priorities accordingly. this goal would be one of the major tasks of such an undertaking, and one of its most important rewards. 32 one important question remains: is there a uniqueness to canadian society that makes it a valuable topic beyond its intrinsic interest to its residents? the answer offered in this paper has been in the affirmative. canada lends itself for comparison to probably a wider range of nations than does any other single country. it encompasses a number of problems such as its industrial development, ethnic diversity and regionalism, comparable with, yet distinct from, other countries. its rolr as a 'mediator' or 'go-between' generates a number of unique internal developments different from most other nations. for these reason's and more, it seems a worthwhile undertaking to continue to develop a 'canadian sociology'. postscript 1977 in the two years since this paper was written there has been a maturing of my thinking about models and theories of canadian societyt although i continue to accept the paper's central direction. i would now adopt the political economy tradition as the most fruitful approach; in my view, it has the strongest historical roots and the greatest insights int:> canada's social structure. it is a tradition represented in different ways in the works of such diverse people as donald creighton, harold innis, tom naylor and stanley ryerson. it encompasses scholars from c.e.macpherson to h. claire pentland to john porter. broadly contained within this tradition is the tasis for a distinctive canadian social science which would make sense of and give meaning to the development and current structure of canadian society. the following are what i regard as the most central components of a model of canada as develops 1 within the political economy tradition. these features of canadian society give direction to the most appropriate questions to be asked and relationships to be explained: 1. the implications of external relations for internal development, especially early colonial ties with france and the united kingdom and current dependence on the united states in many economic, political and military activities. 2. the. persistently active role of the canadian state in the economy and its fragmented federal-provincial structure . 3the continued survival of two nations within a single state--the conquered french and the conquering ;lish--and the demise of the native population. '* . the role of immigration in filling the west during t-arly stages ol pment (1879 to 191^) and the urban centres of too;