commentary jesse russell jesse (diana) russell is currently working on her m.a. thesis in the school of social work at carleton university. as both an "urban' metis and a feminist, jesse responds to ron bourgeault's article "the development of capitalism and the subjugation oi native women in northern canada" which appeared in volume 6 of alternate routes (1983). jesse hopes to stimulate an ongoing discussion of the problems native women encounter within their own culture and within the larger dominant culture. i would like to begin by describing my own particular social position which is in itself wrought with contradiction. as an urban metis raised in toronto, i possess neither treaty status nor an indian culture per se . through my mother, however, i was able to gleen a sense of what this culture is and to grasp the complexity of indian issues. i was forced to aeal with the difficulty of experiencing a female existence of subjugation directly, while indirectly dealing with the racism regarding indian people in canada. never being identified with the latter, my natural inclination was to become an active member of the white women's feminist movement. after ten years of experience working alternatively with white women's centres (rape crisis etc.) and working on reserves with indian women, i felt a strong urgency to address the inherent incompatability between the white women's feminist movement and the unique position (i.e. subjugation) of indian women. in response to ron bourgeault's article, i suppose the first issue i'd like to address is his conclusion that native women would benefit from participation in the "white' feminist movement, and that the feminist movement should in fact be a working class movement that could echo the struggles of native women. i sense bourgeault is naive in two vital senses; that the feminist movement seeks solutions as a "class," and that native women's assimilation into a white culture will resolve their problems. i fear bourgeault has missed the point on both occasions. the feminist 169 movement, from my own experience, does not appear to be a class struggle. more importantly, native women are far from being ready to participate in the white women's movement. by and large, native women's non-participation in the feminist movement is due neither to language differences, nor geography — it is due to culture. the western world-view, as i see it, has religious roots which emphasize a mastery over the earth — an on-going battle to subdue the earth. there is a strong sense of "self," of 'individualism,' which creates a hierarchical relationship between men and men, men and nature. the label i use to conceptualize the western world-view is "homo-centric," which basically refers to the western belief that the homo sapien is separate from animal — separate from nature. the indian world-view differs greatly from this. it is "eco-centric" in the sense that indian people see themselves as inseparable from nature. the great spirit or "life force' is part of all that makes up the earth and its function is to maintain a balance or harmony in nature. there is no concern with conquering nature. because there is no sense of 'separateness , ' ownership is not a concept in indian culture. objects, even man-made objects, possess a spirit which negates the possibility of one's "using" it for something. rather, in indian culture, one 'interacts' with objects. [o the white women's feminist movement, the homo-centric world-view dominates. individualism, in particular, is greatly stressed. indian women cannot share the same strategies used by white women because of their eco-centric world-view. becoming 'personally empowered' is alien to them, and using one's reproductive ability as a bargaining tool is unimaginable. i think using women's reproductive ability is a good example of the importance of different world-views when we're talking about women's struggle 170 against oppression. in terms of the simple threat of extinction, reproduction for native women is a moral obligation — although i must stress here that "obligation' is not the term these women would use to describe their thoughts about mothering. again, what we have here is a very different view of biological reproduction. in eco-centrism, women do not see their reproductive ability as something they "possess,' to withhold at any given time. the indian culture has a verbal tradition which has been maintained through motherhood/mothering. in the western world, mothering may be viewed as oppressive but, in indian culture, it is the reproduction of life — of nature itself; it is cyclical. children are important. to return to bourgeault's article, i feel it also perpetuates the stereotyped image of indian women as apathetic, and ignorant. i take exception to the portrayal of physically unaggressive women as weak in some way. indian women historically have possessed a quiet strength which has enabled them to successfully resist assimilation into white culture. sexism does exist in indian culture but its origin can be located in white culture. as bourgeault correctly points out, egalitarianism (respect for women's labour — both productive and reproductive) is part of " indianness' . reclaiming "indianness' would mean reclaiming respect for women. so it is important that sexism be addressed within indian culture first. this means bringing forward eco-centrism from its shadowy existence and re-asserting it. in conclusion, i do not wish to presume what may happen regarding indian and white women and their respective struggles for equality. i feel it would be elitist to suggest what should happen. if there is a commonality of issues — equal pay for example — then perhaps a joining of forces is a possibility. perhaps as two distinct groups, a joining of alliances may be 171 effective. i do know that sexism cannot be addressed by abandoning one's indian culture. native women must find ways to fight their oppression in ways which are part of indianness. sexism, like racism and classism, must be defined by its victims. solutions must be developed within this same dimension. 172 978-1-926958-01-9 167the ecological revolution making peace with the planet book review the ecological revolution making peace with the planet, by john bellamy foster. new york: monthly press review, 2009. $17.95 us., paper. isbn-13: 9781583671795. pages: 1-328. reviewed by: alda kokallaj1 john bellamy foster’s book is a critical treatise of the ecological crisis facing our planet and a scholarly contribution to the literature of political ecology. the book’s primary aim is to provide “resources for a journey of hope” towards an ecosocial revolution, while we stand at a crucial point regarding humanity’s relation to the earth. the book is divided in three parts. part one, entitled “the planetary crisis” begins by pointing out the ecological crisis that is looming upon the planet and briefly discusses the unsuccessful endeavors for addressing this crisis. particular attention has been paid to efforts undertaken as part of the 1992 rio earth summit and the johannesburg summit, which are seen as failed attempts to achieve a sustainable future. foster argues that sustainable development is increasingly seen as an opportunity for business, thus environmental reform is to be achieved through market-driven models. this part of the book reads easily and is rich in information about the inconsistencies that have lead to questionable environmental policies and the failure to achieve environmental reform on a large scale. in the second part entitled “marx’s ecology”, foster sets the ground for theorizing the ecological revolution. while its theoretical richness cannot be addressed here in its entirety, it is crucial to focus on the concept of ‘metabolic rift’. foster explains that instead of seeing marx’s work as blind towards nature, his work needs to be seen as providing a powerful analysis for the ecological crisis of our time. foster achieves this through an in-depth discussion of marx’s later work on political economy, especially by revealing his discussion of ‘the second agricultural revolu1 alda kokallaj is a ph.d candidate in the department of political science with a concentration in political economy. she can be reached at akokalla@connect.carleton.ca 168 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research tion’ and by unfolding marx’s inspiration with the work of german chemist justus von liebig (organic chemistry in its application to agriculture and physiology, 1840; animal chemistry, 1842; letters on modern agriculture, 1859). for foster, marx employed the concept of ‘metabolic rift’ in order to “capture the material estrangement of human beings in capitalist society from the natural conditions of their existence” (p.180). such discussion reveals that although marx did not attempt to provide a treatment of all ecological problems, his work was not ‘ecologically blind’. indeed, foster rightly maintains, that marx’s work “constitutes a possible starting point for a comprehensive sociology of the environment” (p.196). foster establishes that marx argued and wrote as if nature mattered, and that is the crux of his contribution to sociology as a field, as well as to the movements for an ecological revolution. the third part entitled “ecology and revolution”, presents an integration of theory with practice for establishing the argument that an ecological revolution needs to originate from ‘the social’ realm. thus, it is through a social revolution that secures the provision of basic human needs that an ecological civilization can be achieved. in this way foster maintains that the human relation to nature lies at the heart of the transition to socialism. this identification along with the discussion of the ‘metabolic rift’ found in marx’s work constitutes a significant contribution to socialist theory, which can serve as the starting point for the theorization of the transition from capitalism to socialism. this can also serve in understanding the struggles for sustainable society and human development that are taking place in the periphery of the capitalist system, which need to be seen as examples for fundamental change at the centre. in the last two chapters foster broadly discusses examples from cuba, venezuela, brazil and india as “islands of hope” for the establishment of the human metabolism with nature along with practices of human development, instead of solely economic development. although these are important cases for illustrating the transitional steps from capitalism to an ecological society, the discussion is somewhat insufficient. while expecting the argument for the ecological revolution to acquire more depth towards the end of the book, the reader encounters a rather romanticized and superficial treatment of the struggles for sustainable human development that have taken place in the periphery of the capitalist world system. one further problem with the book is that foster spends a lot of time trying to tie together theory and practice while dealing with some complicated theoretical questions and not-so-easy to sort out practical issues. this has resulted in often repetitive and overburdened sections, rather than providing more straightforward treatment of the practical and theoretical issues. better editing would have assisted the reader to get a clearer understanding of the dynamics of the socio-ecological 169 revolution presented in the book. this, coupled with the fact that the book is a collection of articles turned into chapters, demonstrates its lack of focus and at times makes it a difficult read. despite these problems foster’s book does offer an excellent discussion of some key concepts of marx’s work regarding the metabolism of humanity with nature and relates them to the problematique of eco-social sustainability. foster’s main achievement is to draw together a difficult body of theory with urging political questions and convincingly argue that it is high time ecological crises were addressed via a socialist, as opposed to a capitalist, approach. the root of addressing environmental crises for foster involves a “civilizational shift” that would be revolutionary for culture, economy and society. foster compellingly reveals that questions surrounding the capacity of the capitalist mode of production to wrought environmental destruction have been treated in the classical works of critical political economy. in this way, foster’s book is an important addition to the scholarly works, which assert that the work of marx, especially his later political economy, is characterized by an understanding that nature (non-human nature) matters. hence, the genesis of the questionable sustainability of capitalism can be discerned via marx’s discussion of ‘the second agricultural revolution’. another disciplinary contribution is for the field of sociology. through his discussion of marx, one of the classical thinkers of the field, and by unfolding the ‘metabolic rift’ as well as society – nature relation, foster reveals that theorization, particularly in environmental sociology, can be done on a more theoretically solid ground. more generally, from foster’s argument it can be discerned that in the face of ecological crises we need to think and act beyond disciplinary boundaries. he asserts that a “sociology of the environment” must recognize and consider changes that take place in the social and natural realms, as well as their mutual interaction. thus, social transformation cannot be understood without ecological transformation and vice versa. the ecological revolution making peace with the planet whole book pdf book review: the ecological rift: capitalism’s war on the earth | 285 book review the ecological rift: capitalism’s war on the earth, by john bellamy foster, brett clark, and richard york. new york: monthly review press, 2010. $17.95 u.s.; paper. isbn: 978-1-58367218-1. pages: 544. reviewed by: naomi alisa calnitsky1 in marx’s ecology: materialism and nature (2000), john bellamy foster offered a dynamic and in-depth interrogation of the ecological strands of karl marx’s thought, exploring a number of marx’s critiques of capitalist agriculture and linking his neglected ideas to the modern-day ecological movement. in ecology against capitalism (2002), foster problematized the relationship between contemporary american environmentalism and the needs and preferences of the labour movement, and offered critical insights into the environment’s relationship with the economic world, citing critical contemporary examples of the environmental costs associated with the capitalist industrial footprint. his innovative and up-to-date approach placed politicized ecological questions into direct focus, to ask, how might we incorporate the earth into the balance sheet? building upon past theoretical approaches and contributions, in the ecological rift: capitalism’s war on the earth (2010), foster, clark and york offer a radical and comprehensive critique of the planetary environmental crisis as exacerbated by industrial capitalism. situated within the subfield of environmental sociology, the authors posit arguments which depart from a distinctly marxist foundation. their central target is industrial capitalism and its derivative effects, namely, the unsustainable social habits of consumer forces associated with capitalist production, and the unprecedented levels of ecological destruction associated with accumulative capitalism. foster, clark and york highlight the alienating tendencies of capitalism, as well as the irreversible changes wrought upon our ecosystem and biosphere from capitalist activities. 1 naomi alisa calnitsky is a ph.d. candidate at the department of history, carleton university (ottawa, canada), with a focus on the history of mexican seasonal agricultural workers in western canada. 286 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times by re-inserting ecological thought into analyses of the human economy, this highly-needed and readable work comprised of scientific arguments and synthetic approaches underscores planetary assaults resulting from the human-industrial footprint and bemoans an apparent lack of concern within social science disciplines towards environmental questions at a time when the planet has approached a red alert status. situated within a critical anti-capitalist tradition, the authors point to an abandonment of a critique of capital in existing ecologically-minded social science approaches. they consider the question of “green capitalism,” or capitalism’s potential or ostensible ability to modernize and adapt along ecologically sustainable lines, in a critical light. additionally, they question the deceptive phenomenon of “corporate green-washing.” the work emphasizes accelerated transformations in the global environment, where ecosystem degradation and human-induced climate change is linked intimately to the expansion of industrial capitalism. the authors argue that the recovery of the environment may not be ameliorated solely through faith in capitalism’s ability to adapt or modernize according to green demands. while this remains a problematic viewpoint, given the fact of capitalism’s current position as the dominant economic system governing human economic interrelations across much of the globe, the marxist critique offered by the ecological rift nevertheless remains indispensable. one of the book’s central strengths is its questioning of the premise of unlimited economic growth from an ecologycentered perspective, in which capital is depicted as an “unstoppable” as well as “crushing” force upon nature. the ecological rift successfully bridges a diversity of academic fields including economics, ecology, and environmental/marxist sociology, taking its readership into the realm of a yet-to-be established field, that of political ecology. its authors highlight irreversible ecological transformations such as ocean warming and the degradation of coral reef systems, and place a good deal of emphasis upon scientific proofs for the existence of climate change. highlights of the work include one imaginative chapter entitled “capitalism in wonderland” which illustrates how environmental deterioration has stemmed from human mediations with the natural world and has been propelled by the demands of the capitalist marketplace. here, our capitalist wonderland is framed by foster, clark and york as a thoroughly artificial and alienating human landscape and construct. the ecological rift has global and international implications, and yet it would likely appeal only to an environmentalistinclined readership. the work requires attention from ecological and book review: the ecological rift: capitalism’s war on the earth | 287 economic schools alike, as its efforts to bridge fields represents a widening of boundaries in the name of ecological urgency. significantly, the authors engage with the concept of metabolic rift, defined loosely as the way in which the capitalist system has radically separated natural production from sites consumption, particularly at a global scale and across imperial divides. capitalism has radically separated humanity from nature, and through “metabolic rift analysis” the authors seek to comprehend environmental catastrophe in terms of the capitalist order of things. critically entertaining the question of capitalism’s ability to modernize and adapt according to the demands of sustainability, the ecological rift retains skepticism towards the destructive effects of individualist accumulation and prefers socialism as a route towards sustainability. critically, the work stresses the need for a renewed interrogation into the dynamic relationship between nature and capitalism. it is primarily concerned with an interrogation of capitalism as an anti-ecological force, yet remains wholly devoid of any analysis of capitalism’s relationship with gender, avoiding any discussion of capitalism’s continued place as maleoriented, rationalized economic regime which exploits and intersects with the natural world in profoundly powerful ways. still, the work offers a number of solutions deserving of consideration. offering a dialogue which incorporates the natural sciences with the social sciences, the ecological rift is profoundly multi-disciplinary and one of the strengths of the book is its sense of urgency. the authors claim that we are living in an age of unprecedented ecological destruction and only radical ecological approaches may offer sustainable pathways for environmental regeneration. the author’s discussion of “imperialism and ecological metabolism” probes the concept of imperialist extraction as it intersected with agricultural production and consumption in metropolitan england, exploring the nineteenth century peruvian guano trade to europe from a metabolic standpoint and citing the trade as an example of capitalist exploitation and structural dependency. marx’s humanism, “naturalism” and concept of labour as a metabolic mediation of nature are given due attention. while highly dependent upon marx’s “ecological” mind, without emphasizing contributions from more contemporary ecological thinkers, foster, clark and york reinforce their call for social scientists to interrogate capitalism as it intersects with the natural world. also significantly, the work charts disciplinary transformations and recent theoretical developments in the ecological sciences which have contributed to the genealogy of the sub-discipline of environmental sociology. 978-1-926958-01-9 145 movie review eyes wide shut, director: stanley kubrick; scenario: stanley kubrick, frederic raphael; starring: nicole kidman (alice harford), tom cruise (dr. william ‘bill’ harford), madison eginton (helena harford), sydney pollack (victor ziegler), 1999/usa, 159 min., adaptation from traumnovella by arthur schnitzler. reviewed by: bora erdagi1 eleven years after its release, it is worth remembering stanley kubrick’s last film eyes wide shut for its critique of dehumanized (bourgeois) lifestyles of our times. kubrick worked on the screenplay for quite a long time and could finish shooting only months before his death. the inspiration was the novel traumnovella by arthur schnitzler who was a close friend of sigmund freud. the film is an attempt to question the notions of love, trust, and sexuality in order to unfold the taken-for-granted relations between these notions. it also reveals the role these notions play in constructing and reconstructing social bodies in a certain way. it tells the story of an upper-middle class new york couple (bill harford performed by tom cruise and alice harford performed by nicole kidman) who lose their way upon having a few existential crises in three consecutive days. the diverse routes alice and bill take to deal with their own traumas opens up the possibility to observe the conditions of different levels of (un)consciousness. alice, as opposed to bill, is neither attached in an unbounded way to the dream she was thrown into nor is she too heavily involved in the circumstances surrounding her way of life. bill, on the other hand, is capable of easily justifying the conditions of his life through his instrumental rationality; nevertheless, he easily falls apart within the first crisis. this review attempts to unfold the ways in which the characters try to overcome 1 dr. bora erdagi is a research assistant in the department of philosophy at kocaeli university, izmit, turkey. he can be reached at berdagi@gmail.com. eyes wide shut 146 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research these crises with respect to their class positions. in so doing, it also undertakes a broader search to speculate about the reified nature of current social relations. in other words, while the film reflects the psychoanalytic exploration of the characters, this review aims at a socio-political analysis of the characters. bill is a medical doctor working for upper-class people, and his wife alice works as an art director. in the opening scene we see them in an extremely fancy christmas ball where they find themselves separated and try to find each other for the rest of the evening. the next night, during a moment of drunkenness before having sex, alice and bill start talking about the previous night. alice suddenly starts asking bill questions about their relationship. bill has a hard time answering alice’s simple questions such as “why do you love me?” as he tries to get out of the situation he is trapped in, he is faced with a confession from alice. alice tells him that she cannot avoid thinking about another man. more strikingly, she confesses that she was once ready to leave everything behind for the man she was thinking about. this confession shatters bill’s preconceived beliefs about his marriage as well as his own being. he is thus forced to open his eyes. however, he is not totally woken yet since opening one’s eyes does not necessarily imply they have abandoned the dream. bill, nevertheless, is now left scared and vulnerable, far from the stability of his security zone. upon receiving a phone call from a patient’s family, bill leaves home. but this trip will turn into a nightmare as he is now entirely defenseless. this nightmare will go on until alice wakes him up. when he arrives at the patient’s house, he is informed that his patient has died. afterwards, the deceased patient’s daughter confesses her love for bill in the funeral room to which he does not respond and leaves the house. walking on the street he encounters a prostitute, chats with her for a bit and goes to her place, something he would not have done before. these experiences greatly complicate things for bill, especially after losing his footing on the takenfor-granted ground upon which he formally stood. the light of the real world now dazzles his eyes and yet he does not stop there. for him, the night turns into a search for a story through which he may obtain a counter-position to his wife’s story so that he can reconstruct his lost self-esteem and strengthen his ego. the audience is then brought to a pivotal moment in the story when bill meets a friend in a pub. his friend mentions a private sex party for upper class new yorkers. bill obtains the secret password from his friend and attends by infiltrating the party house with a rented mask and costume. however, bill’s identity is revealed and a prostitute sacrifices herself in an effort to rescue him. after having to leave the party, he gets back home and finds alice talking in her sleep. he wakes her up. alice tells bill that, in her dream, he and she were naked in a deserted place. she says that when he left her to find their clothes, she felt better. then, the man she 147 had been constantly thinking about appeared and they began having sex in front of a crowd. alice’s dream brings forth an absolute possibility for bill to be woken up from his own dream that is his reality. however, bill denies that possibility and retains his calm position. the next day, he returns the rented costume and witnesses the store owner selling his teenage daughter to others for sex. in light of these, and other shocking events in two consecutive nights, he realizes that he has to face his own reality. that same night bill, who finally has something of his own to confess, starts explaining to alice what he had experienced over the last three days. this, for both of them, may denote the end of the sleep, but still not the dream. their sleep ends and eyes are now wide open! with the first sunlight falling on the ground, the harford family is metamorphosed. while christmas shopping the next day, we hear a short dialogue between our “exhausted warriors”: bill: what do you think we should do? alice: what do i think? i don’t know. maybe i think (...) we should be grateful that we’ve managed to survive through all of our adventures (…) whether they were real or only a dream. bill: a dream is never just a dream. alice: the important thing is we’re awake now. alice’s open, questioning and repentant attitude throughout the film proves to be healing for their relationship. she helps, despite all the hardship, the lived experience arise to the level of consciousness rather than suppressing it. throughout the film, bill appears on the screen much more than alice does. alice however, appears only in critical moments, mimicking the relationship between the conscious and unconscious. bill, on the other hand, acts ‘rationally’ under almost all circumstances. but his rationality lacks content; it is completely instrumental, and he observes reality from a paradigmatically representational perspective. questioning is rarely a feature of his rationality. he fears falling apart as he experiences something new and shocking. however, falling apart in bill’s case does not spring from the ‘shock of experience’, which walter benjamin defines in his miscellaneous writings as a norm of nineteenth-century intellectuals. according to benjamin, shock disintegrates people’s emotional world, but it also restructures their intellectual world. in bill’s case, it is hard to observe this restructuring of his reason because he does not utilize the shocking experiences to transform his reality. it is more as if bill has had an accident and keeps chasing whatever has crashed into him rather than trying to understand what had happened. it is, therefore, obvious that bill is not a typical inheritor of the nineteenth-century shock experience. in this sense, he indeed behaves in the exact opposite way to which benjamin describes. bill represents the instrumental reason eyes wide shut 148 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research that theodor w. adorno radically criticizes. moreover, bill resembles a typical reconciliatory bourgeois of twentieth-century keynesianism who declares himself as participative in social and political life, while completely ignoring the ongoing class struggles and yet wanting his ‘heroism’ to be acknowledged by others. his dreams and fantasies about the world—and about his heroic position in it—replace his real life experiences, and therefore it is difficult for him to be woken from his dreams (his constructed reality). alice, on the other hand, positions herself at the complete opposite pole. she thinks that it is foolish to hide behind masks, especially after the masks are uncovered. thus, unlike bill, she chooses to deal with reality, not through fantasy but through language. in that, she also tries to emancipate language from its given constraints. emancipating language from its chains allows for slippages and enables consciousness to set itself free from tensions. this opens up room for spontaneity. her use of story-telling, her first story occurring while her and bill were smoking marijuana and the second after just waking up, represents this process. alice’s peaceful reconciliation with reality is therefore much easier than bill’s, which moves alice to an advantageous position over bill. however, it by no means puts her in a revolutionary position because alice in a sense occupies the position of the bourgeoisie in the totality of the capitalist system, as georg lukacs would put it. for lukacs, the bourgeoisie is aware of the reality of class struggles with respect to their position within the master-slave dialectic. however, for the sake of their very existence, ‘the master’ (the bourgeoisie) forces ‘the slave’ (the proletariat) to obey. what this contradictory mechanism of subordination generates for the bourgeoisie is twofold: the awareness of their dependence on the proletariat and possibility of manipulation. yet this awareness does not put the bourgeoisie in a revolutionary position, which would allow them to overcome this contradiction. broadly speaking, as long as the bourgeoisie can survive this contradiction, the system will continue to benefit them. in this context, alice, unlike bill, is well aware of her and bill’s own class position and behaves in the way this awareness requires. she knows that, as members of the upper-middle class, they are afforded the privilege of enjoying their life through the denial and manipulation of the shocking contradictions their material conditions may reinforce. it is this knowledge that makes her a healing agent in their relationship even during times of crisis. this knowledge provides her with the flexibility to easily adjust her reality to the changing circumstances and assume the different stances necessary in defense of both herself and her husband. the two portraits drawn above help us to unpack two different modes of politics. the first, represented by bill, depends entirely on traditional modalities; the functioning of which is dependent less on awareness than it is on repression techniques as a defense mechanism. as opposed to its rational outlook, it is never 149 reconciled with critical reasoning. this is a bourgeois politics. the second, represented by alice, relies on awareness as well as manipulation; it also emanates from a bourgeois politics. despite the differences, both modes of politics require masks to be performed. because, as it is illustrated above for both alice and bill, family replaces free sex in their relationship, reality replaces fantasy, recognition by others replaces conflict, the conservation of lifestyle replaces alteration and finally, dream/ masks replaces real life. then, it seems reasonable to claim the following: waking up is not as difficult as imagined. it is however, more difficult to awaken from a dream that is thought to be limited by the sleep itself. because dreaming is not something that consciousness can deal with easily, unpacking a dream is only possible through the denial of various masks. abandoning the masks however, requires a realistic revolutionary position acknowledging the real life experiences and material conditions of today’s world where dreaming is made tremendously charming through the fantasy, ideologies and ubiquitous reification that occupies almost every aspect of modern life. in the last scene of the film, both alice and bill obtain awareness of their bourgeois lifestyles. in other words, both characters finally wake up from their sleep. neither of them however, abandons their dreams because neither wants to lose their world of fetishized commodities. in this way, lukacs’s prophecy does not come true: totality is preserved for the sake of totality. eyes wide shut 150 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research whole book pdf symposium on braverman comments by leo panitch i want to begin with a couple of comments on what braverman has accomplished. i think this is important because although burawoy began his paper and his talk with praise of braverman, by the time he's through with him, he's dragged him through what marx would call the "muck" . now, all of this puts me in an odd position because i have criticisms of braverman's work. i was struck, in coming into this room, by a resemblance to a court-chamber--the way we're sitting here, the way you're sitting there. and as i read burawoy's critique of braverman, i had the feeling that what was being engaged in here was a prosecution and that willy-nilly i was being cast into the role of the defence attorney. therefore, you may have to excuse me if what i say sounds like that to some extent, if i have to occasionally bring evidence into court, that is, the odd quotation, in order to salvage braverman from the critique which we just heard.. in order to counter the critique, i think one has to note braverman's achievements, the ones that haven't been noted. first of all, braverman has brought us back to a proper appreciation of what marx meant by the tendency to emiseration. those embourgeoisement theorists who thought that marx meant by this the increasing material impoverishment of workers simply did not know what they were talking about. on the contrary, marx saw capitalism as constantly, through its restless striving after the general forms of wealth, driving labour out beyond the limits of its natural needs and producing the material elements needed for the development of the rich individualityreplacing natural needs with needs that were historically produced. in other words, capital was itself constantly redefining subsistence at higher levels. what emiseration meant for marx in this context was 15 alternate routes something different. it was what braverman describes as the degradation of work, and marx put it extremely well in turns of capitalists establishing "the accumulation of misery corresponding to the accumulation of capital". and what he means by that is the accumulation of wealth at one pole is therefore at the same time the accumulation of misery expressed in marx's terms as "the agony of toil, slavery, ignorance, brutality, mental degradation at the opposite pole, i.e. on the side of the class that produces its own product in the form of capital". that's what marx meant by the tendency to emiseration, and what braverman has done is salvage this definition for our own time. well, braverman also has done more than this, and one of the ways in which people who look at braverman have done him injustice is that they see the book as a book on the labour process. it's much more than that, its central core, its intent, to begin with, was to identify the structure of the working class, and the manner in which it had changed. if you read the first page of braverman's introduction, that's what he set out to do. he makes it clear that in the process of trying to look at occupational shifts, that is, between occupations and within occupations, he became aware of a contradiction in the literature between an argument that went something to the effect that modern work required higher levels of education, training, mental effort, etc., and a simultaneous argument that work was subdivided into petty tasks, petty operations, that are mundane, alienating, and so on. braverman found no attempt to reconcile those two processes. so he began to look for a dynamic which would explain the evolution of labour processes within occupations as well as between them, and this led him to stress the evolution of management and technology, of the modern corporation as well as of social structure. he found himself doing a history of the capitalist mode of production over the last hundred 16 symposium on braverman years. but this does not mean that his central concern was lost in the process. it's no accident that the last third of the book is concerned with the mapping-out of the structure of the modern working class, in the context of his examination of the dynamics of proletarianization. he arrives at part iv, at this point, and what he gives us is something not dissimilar to the kinds of mapping we receive from kinds of recent marxist theoreticians like carchedi or even erik olin wright. but unlike their work, he provides us not merely with a mapping which is deductively arrived at, but one which is also empirically and inductively arrived at. as a result, his mapping is much more detailed and richer; it has meat on it if you will. we will remember that the critique begins at the level of a divorce between evaluation and criticism, a divorce between "science" and critique in braverman, with the statement that in marx, these two things are combined, and i think that's very true and it's an important insight—probably the person who has given the best expression of that insight in marx is norman geras . and what he was getting at was the argument that marxism as a critique is not a moral critique, not an ethical critique; it doesn't take its standpoint in that sense from a set of values--it is scientific, and insofar as it attempts to get at the essence of things rather than the appearance of things, it cuts away mythology, ideology in the false sense, and establishes criticism by counteracting mythology and ideology. his criticism is therefore based on uncovering the essence of reality and it doesn't depend on a moral or ethical stance. i don't think braverman does in fact base his criticism of capitalism on a moral stance, but bases it on his attempt to uncover the dynamics of proletarianization in capitalism. moreover, i don't think one avoids the problem that burawoy seems to think braverman has by stepping out of capitalism. the whole 17 alternate routes problematic of speaking of inside and outside of capitalism in terms of points of view for us today is very bothersome. it's very difficult to imagine that we, living in a capitalist society, can step outside of capitalism when we try to define feudalism. we define those elements of feudalism that appear to us important vis-a-vis capitalism; we never step outside of capitalism (that seems to me an essential point in the sociology of knowledge). moreover, what burawoy gives us is a very ideal-typical definition of feudalism, one which-really i think would apply to all pre-capitalist formations, and not to feudalism itself. braverman would reject an attempt to understand the contrasts between feudalism and capitalism in ideal-typical terms; he in fact says very clearly and explicitly in his introduction that the same productive forces that are characteristic of the close of one epoch of social relations are also characteristic of the opening of the succeeding epoch. it is not a matter of craft production not being there in feudalism and suddenly being there in capitalism--in that sense braverman is both developing his point of view, if you like, from feudalism and from capitalism. what he is talking about is not the craft worker per se; what he is talking about is the paradox that labour is a commodity (labour-power is a commodity) that can't be separated from its owner. that's what he's talking about; and what capitalism has to do in treating labour-power as a commodity is in some way attempt to attenuate, although it can never remove, that indissoluble connection between labour-power and the individual to whom it belongs. a second point that burawoy made is a critique of braverman for treating class as an objective rather than a subjective category. i think that if one reads braverman carefully, one sees that an attack on braverman for not seeing class as class formation is a •traw man. braverman makes very clear that he doesn't want to 18 symposium on braverman deprecate the importance of the study of the state of consciousness of the working class, since it is only through consciousness that a class becomes an actor on the historic stage class consciousness is that state of social cohesion reflected in the understanding and activities of a class or portion of a class. its absolute expression is a pervasive and durable attitude on the part of a class toward its position in society. its long-term relative expression is found in the slowly changing traditions, experiences, education, and organization of the class. its short-term relative expression is a dynamic complex of moods and sentiments affected by circumstances and changing with them, sometimes in periods of stress and conflict, almost from day to day. a class, cannot exist in society without in some degree manifesting a consciousness of itself as a group, with common problems, interests and prospects, although this manifestation may for long periods be weak, confused and subject to manipulation by other classes. (braverman, 1974: 29, 30). so i think that the conception that braverman has is very much of a class as an historical actor. but what he is saying, is that in order to understand and examine empirically that class, one has to begin with a certain mapping, in order to know what to look for. przeworski , in his important paper on class formations, ends up by agreeing with this, but giving us a very crude mapping— industrial workers , white collar workers, bourgeoisie, will do. but what braverman gives us is a rich mapping, which marks out the paths to follow much more clearly. so again i think that the criticism is misconceived. there is another criticism of braverman--he doesn't talk enough about class struggle. clearly, this is part of our problem, which wasn't braverman 's problem (he didn't live in a university). in isolation, we have a need to shout class struggle from the rooftops in terms of understanding society. braverman has an understanding of society's dynamic being composed of class struggle so deep that it suffuses his work and he doesn't constantly have to keep crying class struggle. i think that if you read braverman (this is not new--many 19 alternate routes people have made this criticism of braverman) this criticism can be avoided. rather than, as burawoy suggests, seeing workers' responses to taylorism being merely impotent resistance, or simply internal friction, braverman makes it clear that it doesn't have that view at all. braverman points out that taylorism raised a storm of opposition among trade unions during the early part of the century, and then he goes on to quote, after discussing that opposition, a long passage from the international moulders journal in which he shows that the moulders understood perfectly what was happening to them. when he later speaks of internal friction, (and he doesn't use the term "mere" friction) he first makes clear that the pace of production is decided in a practice which' largely assumes the form of a struggle, whether organized or not. braverman very clearly has this image of class struggle taking place, not only and maybe even not so much, given his american context, at the level of the central organizations of the unions, at the level of the national civic federation in the nineteenth century, but at the level of the shopfloor in day-to-day struggle. and it's interesting how he's able to use taylor to make his own case in this regard, because his quotations from taylor are full of the class struggle (soldiering, etc.). burawoy argues that braverman doesn't have a concept of contradiction; at best it's only there in passing. to some extent i think this is true, in the sense that the contradiction that braverman identifies apart from class struggle is the gap between potential which exists in modern capitalism, and the actuality that we experience. but the irony of burawoy 's points with regard to contradiction, is that of the eclecticism that he indicates by referring to certain neo-marxists who do use the concept of contradiction. he refers to habermas and offe and others who have decided that the working class is not an 20 symposium on braverman element in the contradiction any longer, who identify contradiction at the highly abstract levels of legitimacy crises in the sense that crises then always beset capitalism. even the best of the works based on this, like o'connor, give very little play to the actual class struggle. sure, you can identify contradictions, the question is to what extent can you operationalize them in terms of being able to understand whether a society will in fact evolve in a certain direction or not. and it's interesting that the theoretical framework that burawoy adopts in terms of understanding capitalism and in terms of his critique of braverman, is that of understanding how capitalism in a concrete way reproduces itself. i think that is very important and it's one of the great contributions of the structuralist (marxist) developments. but i wonder whether, by simply looking at the way capitalism reproduces itself, we don't fall into the same error that parsons or parsons and shils fell into. parsons and chils argued that by understanding the way in which the system maintained itself, one could also understand the conditions for change. all one can understand, if the system doesn't reproduce itself, is breakdown; one doesn't understand conditions of transformation, by simply studying maintenance. and there's no doubt that one of the great problems with the structuralists, even the structuralists like poulantzas, is that they don't establish the conditions for change in any sense. they are simply talking, in a very functionalist way, of outcomes rather than purpose at the centre of their analysis, of how the state comes in to plug the gaps, the contradictions that develop in the system. one final point on socialist machines, and then i'll shut up. i think that in a sense burawoy 's onto something here, in what is i think an important section of the paper, but i'm not sure one can lay apathy on braverman, the kind of neutral view of technology that is 21 alternate routes suggested in the latter part of the paper. i don't think one can hang on braverman the conception that technology is neutral, that machines are neutral. braverman makes it very clear in the beginning of his work that the treatment of the interplay between forces and relations of production occupied marx in almost all of his historical writings, and while there is no question that he gave primacy to the forces of production in the long sweep of history, the idea that this primacy on a day-to-day basis could be used in a formalistic way in the analysis of history would never have entered his mind. within the historical, analytical limits of capitalism, according to marxist analysis, technology instead of simply producing social relations, is produced by social relations represented by capital. the concrete and determinate forms of society are indeed "determined" rather than accidental , but this is the determinacy of the thread-by-thread weaving of the fabric of history, not the imposition of external formulas... every society is a moment in the historical process, and can be grasped only as part of that process. capitalism, a social form, when it exists in time, space, population, and history, weaves a web of myriad threads; the conditions of its existence form a complex network each of which presupposes many others. it is because of this solid and tangible existence, this concrete form produced by history, no part of which may be changed by artificial suppositions without doing violence to its true mode of existence it is precisely because of this that it appears to us as "natural," "inevitable", and "eternal". and it is only in this sense, as a fabric woven over centuries, that we may say that capitalism "produced" the present capitalist mode of production. this is a far cry from a ready-made formula which enables us to "deduce" from a given state of technology a given mode of social organization. (braverman, 1974: 21, 22). braverman clearly argues here that technology is a product of social relations, and i think he is arguing, at least implicitly, that the bringing about of socialism involves not only the changing of social relations, but the changing of machines in the process, and his discussion of the soviet union yields this interpretation. 22 austerity is bad for our health | 199 austerity is bad for our health: gender and distributional impacts of ontario’s 2012 budget — sheila block1 there are many questions to be asked and answered about the shifts in fiscal policy stance and discourse from the start of the 2008 financial crisis to the present. the policy consensus on the need for concerted international government intervention and the need for constraints and regulation of markets has vanished from the mainstream policy discussion. it has been replaced by an austerity agenda that suffers from short-term amnesia about the causes of government deficits and debt, and is focused instead on a further reduction in the role of the state. this paper will, however, limit itself to an analysis of the 2012 ontario budget, and its gender and distributional impacts. the agreement reached between the ndp and the liberal government resulted in the first progressive change in canadian income tax rates in more than a decade (benzie & ferguson, 2012). the agreement included a temporary increase in taxes for ontarians earning more than $500,000 per year and a 1 percent increase in rates for people who are surviving on social assistance. these were small, but important, first steps in addressing the record levels of income inequality in ontario. these adjustments around the edges, however, will not change the fundamental impact of this budget. the budget document boasted that for every dollar in new revenues, there were four dollars of savings and cost containment measures. even after the agreement with the ndp, average annual growth in program spending will be held to 1.0 percent between 2011–12 and 2014–15 (ontario ministry of finance, 2012). this means that there will be real, per capita decreases in government spending in ontario. a program of reductions in government services to this size and scale will increase inequality. research by mackenzie and 1 sheila block is the director of economic analysis at the wellesley institute, an independent research and policy institute focused on advancing population health. 200 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism shillington (2009) shows the progressivity of government expenditures. these reductions will have the most detrimental impact on low-income ontarians, but will also reach far beyond them. some ontarians will have to do without the public services they have relied on because they will not be able to afford to purchase them privately. for others, life will become far more expensive when they have to start paying privately for services their tax dollars used to pay for. only those whose resources are so large that they rarely need to rely on public services will be unaffected by the impact of such a shift in the landscape of ontario public services. given their higher incidence of low income, racialized and immigrant communities will be disproportionately affected by these cutbacks. an example of the distributional impact of cutbacks in services is the changes to education funding (people for education, 2012). these changes will include cuts to programs that support math acquisition in schools. some children, who need this assistance, will go without it because their families will not be able to afford to purchase these services privately. for other families, life will become more expensive when they have to privately purchase this help for their children, previously paid for by their tax dollars. only those parents who were already privately purchasing these services for their children will be unaffected. the impact of the loss of public services will be compounded for the thousands of families who have members with public sector jobs. many of these families will face unemployment, reduced access to public services, reduced family incomes, and increased economic uncertainty. again, the impact of these changes will be felt more acutely by lower-income ontarians. workers in lower-paid occupations — such as cleaning, food preparation, and clerks — are generally better paid in the public sector than in the private sector. a cook working in the public sector was paid an average of $26,216 a year in 2006, which is 24 percent more than the $21,089 average received by private sector cooks. on the other hand, higher-paid occupations — such as managers, lawyers and accountants — tend to be paid considerably less in the public sector than in the private sector. for example, engineering managers in the public sector were paid an average of $93,514 in 2006, which is 27 percent below the average of $128,886 in the private sector (sanger, 2011). as a result, higher-income public sector workers who lose their jobs have better prospects in the private sector than lower-income workers who lose theirs. these cutbacks in services and loss of public sector jobs will come at a time when income inequality in canada is at levels that have not been seen since the 1920s (yalnizyan, 2010). austerity is bad for our health | 201 health impacts of austerity the government’s austerity agenda poses substantial risks to the health and well-being of ontarians. a recent report from statistics canada provides a stark example of the impact of income and income inequality on health. the difference in life expect ancy at age 25 between the highest and lowest income groups was 7.1 years for men and 4.9 years for women (tjepkema & wilkins, 2011). while these differences are striking, an equally important finding is that life expectancy increases with each and every step in the income scale. this research found that the gaps are even greater in health-related quality of life, where once again, there was an improvement in health at every step up the income scale. as this research shows, the health impacts of government actions that improve social conditions are not limited to low-income individuals and families. this is supported by international research that shows that inequality has an impact on our health and well-being (wilkinson & pickett, 2009). in more equal countries, people are healthier, live longer, and commit fewer crimes. these relationships hold among all income groups. even for the highest income segment of the population, people are safer, healthier and live longer when they live in a more equal society. there are many ways that austerity programs have an impact on health. the link between unemployment and ill-health has been clearly established. research on the aggregate level has shown that high levels of unemployment in society and in neighbourhoods are correlated with poor health and increased mortality (block, 2010). a recent imf report, based on international evidence, shows that austerity programs increase unemployment and long-term unemployment in particular (ball, leigh, & loungani, 2011). the report also shows that the burden of austerity is disproportionately borne by wage earners rather than those who rely on profits or rents for their incomes. increased unemployment, lower job quality, decreased levels of/access to social benefits, and reduced access to services that support social inclusion will all have a negative impact on ontarians’ health. and these impacts will fall disproportionately on ontarians from marginalized communities – particularly those who are low-income, racialized, and new immigrants. gender impacts of austerity the burden of reductions in public services, loss of public sector employment, and privatization of public sector employment falls more heavily on women than on men. the slowdown in spending proposed in the budget cannot be accomplished without reduced employment in the 202 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism public sector, and a shift of employment within the public sector from better paid unionized jobs with pensions and benefits to more precarious work. these changes will have a differential impact by gender. women comprise just over 60 percent of ontario public sector employees, and about 47 percent of private sector employees (statistics canada, n.d.). the impact of layoffs will be compounded by the differences in wages for women in the public and private sectors. on average, women employed in public sector jobs are paid 4.5 percent more than women in comparable occupations in the private sector: $45,821 compared to $43,841. women who are laid off from the public sector will likely have difficulty finding employment with similar remuneration, men in the public sector are paid an average of 5.3 percent less: $57,318 compared to $60,531 (sanger, 2011). as a result, a decrease in public sector employment will tend to widen the gap between men and women’s wages. the impact on women’s remuneration is not limited only to job losses. shifts in the method of public service delivery will also have a disproportionate impact. private delivery of services and a shift to community–based health care delivery will move women to more precarious employment situations, where they are less likely to be unionized and typically have lower compensation. caregiving makes up a substantial portion of public services. when these services are reduced, the responsibility falls on disproportionately on women to pick up the slack. for example, 21 percent of women in ontario provide unpaid caregiving to seniors as compared to 16 percent of men. women also provided more hours of caregiving, with 9 percent spending more than 5 hours a week as compared to 5.7 percent of men (statistics canada, 2008). the loss of public services will increase unpaid work for women while reducing their remuneration and opportunities for paid work. reducing women’s employment and wages has an impact on their families and their communities. the table below shows the increasing importance of women’s contributions to family incomes. the increase in the share of families where women contribute more than 50 percent of income has been sharpest in areas of the province that have been particularly hard hit by the downturn in manufacturing. these families and areas will be particularly disadvantaged by this year’s budget. austerity is bad for our health | 203 sh ar e o f t ot al n um be r of fa m il ie sw it h th e w if e c on tr ib ut in g ov er 50 % to h us ba nd -w if e e m pl oy m en t i nc om e 20 00 20 01 20 02 20 03 20 04 20 05 20 06 20 07 20 08 20 09 to ro nt o 27 .7% 28 .2% 28 .7% 29 .2% 29 .5% 29 .7% 30 .1% 30 .5% 31 .2% 32 .8% lo nd on 26 .2% 26 .3% 26 .8% 27 .2% 27 .4% 27 .8% 28 .0% 28 .8% 30 .0% 32 .4% w in ds or 20 .4% 21 .5% 22 .5% 22 .7% 23 .7% 24 .2% 25 .2% 26 .5% 27 .9% 31 .6% ha m ilt on 22 .8% 23 .7% 24 .4% 24 .7% 25 .1% 25 .9% 26 .7% 27 .5% 28 .3% 30 .4% on ta rio 25 .8% 26 .1% 26 .8% 27 .3% 27 .7% 28 .0% 28 .5% 29 .0% 29 .7% 31 .6% so ur ce : s ta tis tic s c an ad a. ta ble 11 100 21 fa m ily ch ar ac te ris tic s, hu sb an dwi fe fam ilie s, by w ife ’s c on tri bu tio n t o h us ba nd -w ife em plo ym en t i nc om e, an nu al (n um be r u nl es s o th er wi se no te d) 204 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism conclusion the changes to the 2012 ontario budget that resulted from the agreement between the liberal government and the ndp were a welcome departure from the austerity agenda. they increased the progressivity of the tax system, and mitigated the erosion of purchasing power of inadequate social assistance rates. however, the overall impact of this budget is to increase inequality in ontario. by relying much more heavily on cutback on expenditures than increasing tax revenues, it will have a disproportionate impact on lower income ontarians. because of the role of public sector employment in women’s working lives; it will also erode gender equity in the province. increased inequality, unemployment, and low income resulting from this budget will have negative health impacts for ontarians. references ball, l. leigh, d. and loungani, p. (2011). painful medicine: the international monetary fund finance and development, 48(3), 20-24. www.imf.org/ external/pubs/ft/fandd/2011/09/pdf/ball.pdf benzie, r. and ferguson, r. (2012, april 23). ontario budget: mcguinty agrees to horvath’s tax the rich scheme toronto star. http://www. thestar.com/news/canada/politics/article/1166296—ontario-budget mcguintyandhorwath-in-last-ditch-talks-to-prevent-election block, s. (2010). work and health: exploring the impact of employment on health disparities. the wellesley institute. http://www.wellesleyinstitute. com/publication/our-working lives-affect-our-health/ mackenzie, h., & shillington, r. (2009). canada’s quiet bargain the benefits of public spending canadian centre for policy alternatives. http://www.policyalternatives.ca/ sites/default/files/uploads/publications/national_office_pubs/2009/ benefits_from_public_spending.pdf ontario ministry of finance. (2012). balancing the budget. toronto: queen’s printer. http://www.fin.gov.on.ca/en/budget/ontariobudgets/2012/bk3.html people for education. (2012). education funding cuts in 2012 budget. http:// www.peopleforeducation.ca/pfe-news/ontario-budget-includes-cutsto-education-funding/ sanger, t. (2011). battle of the wages: who gets paid more, public or private sector workers? ottawa: canadian union of public employees. statistics canada. (n.d.).table 282 0012 labour force survey estimates (lfs), employment by class of worker, north american industry classification system (naics) and sex, annually (persons). austerity is bad for our health | 205 cansim (database). last updated january 4, 2012. http://www5.statcan. gc.ca/cansim/pick-choisir?lang=eng&p2=33&id=2820012 statistics canada. (2008). 2006 census. unpaid work, age groups and sex for the population 15 years and over of canada, provinces, territories, census divisions and census subdivisions. catalogue number 97-559xcb2006015.last updated july 4, 2011. http://goo.gl/hokxy statistics canada. (n.d.). table 111-0021 family characteristics, husbandwife families, by wife’s contribution to husband-wife employment income, annual (number). cansim (database). last updated june 26, 2012. http://www5.statcan.gc.ca/cansim/pickchoisir?lang=eng&p2=3 3&id=1110021 tjepkema, m. & wilkins, r. (2011). remaining life expectancy at age 25 and probability of survival to age 75, by socio-economic status and aboriginal ancestry. statistics canada health reports. 22(4), 2-7. http:// www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/82-003-x/2011004/article/11560-eng.pdf wilkinson, r. & pickett, k. (2009). the spirit level: why more equal societies always do better. london: allen lane. yalnizyan, a. (2010). the rise of canada’s richest 1%. canadian centre for policy alternatives. http://www.policyalternatives.ca/sites/default/files/ uploads/publications/national%20office/20 10/12/richest%201%20 percent.pdf | 255 an interview with noam chomsky democracy and the public university rebecca schein is assistant professor and acting coordinator of the human rights stream at the institute of interdisciplinary studies, carleton university (ottawa, canada) . her teaching and research interests include: nationalism and cosmopolitanism; citizenship and civic pedagogies; social movements; social and economic rights; science studies . research projects include: a critical cultural study of the u .s . peace corps and american cosmopolitanism; an examination of “risk management”, data ownership, and contemporary ideals of competent citizenship . noam chomsky is a political theorist and activist, and institute professor emeritus of linguistics at the massachusetts institute of technology (massachusetts, u .s .a) . in addition to his work in linguistics, chomsky has written widely on u .s . foreign and domestic policy, power and ideology, as well as the corporate media . having authored more than 100 books, his most recent include: profit over people, rogue states, the essential chomsky, and power and terror . noam chomsky was interviewed by rebecca schein at carleton university on april 8, 2011 .1 rebecca schein (rs): the title of this discussion was “democracy and the public university” and i thought i would start with a really big question which is what do we mean when we talk about a public university? what is it that makes a public university? noam chomsky (nc): well there’s a technical definition. this depends on who is in charge of the administration, the finances and so on. it’s either the government or the private institution. if it’s the government it’s a public university, if it’s a private institution it’s a private university. actually that’s just technical–the boundaries are extremely flexible. take my own university, mit. technically it’s a private university, but it’s overwhelmingly subsidized by the government. in fact when i got there in 1955 and up through the early 1970s probably ninety percent of the academic program was paid by the pentagon. the political science department was openly funded by the cia until the early 60s, when it got kind of embarrassing. after that some other technique was used and since then the funding has shifted for interesting reasons having to do with the nature of the economy. so 1  interview transcribed by kate gentle. a recording of this interview is available at: http:// www1.carleton.ca/iis/news/noam-chomsky/ an interview with noam chomsky democracy and the public university 256 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times technically, mit is private but from another point of view it’s public. the administration is private and the trustees are not specifically responsible to state authorities. on the other hand, if you go down the street to the university of massachusetts it’s entirely public and also gets some funding from the federal government. harvard has the biggest private endowment in the world. it’s a private university but again there is plenty of government funded work going on. rs: most of us are probably not imagining a time of pentagon funding or its equivalent when we talk about the need to defend or restore the public-ness of our universities, nor would most of us be likely to see pentagon funding as supportive of a democratic mission for universities. what is the relationship between democracy and a university’s public-ness? nc: you just can’t draw mechanical conclusions about how research will be carried out from the source of the funding. a lot of my friends on the left think that if you are pentagon funded you must be working for the military. its exactly the opposite. when you were pentagon funded they didn’t care what you did. if you wanted to overthrow the government in your spare time that’s ok. in 1968, when mit was completely pentagon funded, i was in a lab that was one-hundred percent funded by the three armed services. that lab was also the centre of anti-war resistance in the country. several of us, including me, were on the verge of long jail sentences. that was all under pentagon funding and there was no interference. for twenty-five years i was teaching undergraduate courses in social and political issues and social change. they were open to the community and usually met in the evening. i was doing them in my own time but the university didn’t shut them down. a lot of the students who came out were involved in the activism of the 60s. some of the former students are doing things right now. as i say, it was the centre of anti-war resistance but there was no interference. there was a little harassment of the courses from the fbi but not from the pentagon. interestingly, it was the increase in corporate funding through the later period that led to greater secrecy. in 1969, there was a period of a lot of student activism [at mit]. there were protests about military labs, which were administered by mit, and it was reaching a crisis which nobody wanted. so everybody did what you do when there’s a crisis–you establish a commission to look into it. i was on the commission which looked into institute financing. it turned out that about half the institute budget was administering | 257 the military labs, and the other half was the academic budget. the military labs did classified secret military work, but that was kind of a joke too. technically it was secret, but the academic side was open. again a kind of porous distinction. of the academic budget in 1969 maybe ninety percent was pentagon funded. there was no war work except for the political science department. the political science department was involved in pacification programs in vietnam, and naturally this was under the rubric of a peace research institute. they had secret seminars and things like that, which you’re not supposed to have, but outside the political science department there was no dedicated war work. the pentagon was not funding war work–they were funding the high tech economy. the pentagon was a technique. they were deluding tax payers into providing funds for the future benefit of private corporations. the pentagon funded advances in computing, the development of the internet, lasers–in fact the whole it revolution that enabled the high tech economy. the funding for innovation and initiative comes in many ways through the state sector, and for business that’s great. they wait around and eventually reap the profits of publicly resourced innovation. the tax payers pay them on the assumption that we’re saving ourselves from the russians or something like that. that’s basically the system. through the 50’s and the 60’s the cutting edge of the economy was electronics-based, and the pentagon was a good cover for that sort of research. now the cutting edge of the economy is more biology based. so we see funding shift to other government institutes like the national institutes of health. the shift in the sources of government money largely reflects the direction of the economy is headed, just as it did in the 1950’s and 60’s around mit and other research universities. this happens all over the country. mit is extreme but it is all over stanford, north carolina and so on. around the research universities you get small start ups. those are faculty members who are using the government funded research and development to start up small businesses. back then they were electronics-based, and if they were successful they’d be bought up by raytheon and i-tech and other big high tech companies. now if you go around the campus the start-ups are genetic engineering, biotechnology, pharmaceuticals, and the big buildings around are novartis and all these guys who want to milk the research an interview with noam chomsky democracy and the public university 258 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times development that is going on under government auspices in the university. that’s the basis for a lot of the economy. this goes a long way back but it really took off after the second world war–partly because of changes in the nature of science and technology. in the 1950’s, when i was there, mit was actually an engineering school: you went there if you wanted to build things. now if you want to build a bridge or an electric circuit you go to wentworth institute or some other place. mit is a science university–you study basic science and basic math and you take pretty much the same courses whether you’re in aeronautical engineering or electrical engineering. the technology changes fast, so if the students learns the technology of today, they won’t be able to get a job twenty years from now. technology will be different. if they learn fundamental science they can grow with it. so everything changed. the same is true in the biological-based areas such as pharmaceuticals. at the same time, we see an increase in corporate funding in universities, and that has to do not with changes in science and technology, but with changes in the way the economy is structured. there is more of an effort to build a business model for everything, and corporate funding is part of that picture. corporate funding has an effect. for one thing it tends to drive research towards short term applied work. when the pentagon or nih is funding something, they’re thinking about the long term health of the economy. when merck is funding something, they want something for themselves, not their competitors, and they want it tomorrow. so you end up getting more short term applied research. you also get secrecy for the first time. there was no secrecy under the pentagon. they wanted to be as open as possible because it just impedes communication between scientists and engineers. in fact there was no security in the buildings. you could walk in twenty-four hours a day. a corporation may not be able to enforce secrecy, but it can make it clear that you’re not going to get your contract renewed if something gets out. so there’s a coarsening effect, which you’d expect when a business model is imposed on research. rs: so is it reasonable to think that public universities, specifically, have a democratic function? can you spell out the relationship between publicness and democracy? nc: well you know, mit was a private university which means you have to pay tuition to get in. the tuition is not exorbitant, but it’s tuition. a public university is supposed to be free. its supposed to be for the | 259 public. that used to be the case. the university of pennsylvania is an ivy league college, and when i went it was one hundred dollars. you could easily get a scholarship, which i did. working students could get a scholarship. now it’s probably $20, 000, $30,000 and the public universities have changed radically since the 1970’s. i don’t know about here in canada. i’m talking about the united states. let me give you a personal example. a couple of months ago i happened to be giving talks in mexico city at the national university. it’s a big university–it has a couple of hundred thousand students, pretty high quality, good facilities, smart students, good faculty, low salaries by our standards but quite an efficient, good university. a perfectly respectable university. it’s free. ten years ago the government tried to slightly raise tuition. there was a national student strike and the government backed off. in fact one of the main administration buildings on campus, i discovered, is still occupied by students from that strike and it has become kind of a movement centre, a community activities centre. the administration doesn’t like it. a lot of the students don’t like it, but they’re not calling in the police to throw them out. in mexico city there is a public university that is not only free but open admissions, so it’s open to everyone. they have compensatory courses because a lot of the students don’t have the right background. i was there, met students, talked to faculty. it was pretty impressive. mexico is a very poor country, and i went from there to california, which is maybe the richest place in the world. in california they are consciously destroying the best public education system in the world. the california public education system was pretty amazing. the universities were great universities. there’s lower tiers like state colleges, lower colleges, other universities, all quite high level, and they used to be free. tuitions have gone sky high. in fact its very likely that berkeley and ucla, the two stars in the system, will be privatized. they’re almost private universities now if you look at the tuition and the endowments,. the rest of the system will be lowered in quality–more vocationally oriented and less funding. that’s one of the richest places in the world. in fact this year for the first time i think less than half of the cost of the university is provided by public funding. mostly it’s tuition. that’s true in many states in the united states now. these are all steps towards privatizing society and creating a kind of two-tiered society– these are big processes, happening not just in universities. none of this is economically driven. you can an interview with noam chomsky democracy and the public university 260 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times see that by comparing mexico to the united states. mexico is a very poor country. the united states is the richest country in history. so it’s not economic. these are social decisions both in mexico and in the united states. what’s a public university supposed to be? like mexico. it should be free, there should be an option for open admissions, and resources should go into it to making sure it works. it is not impossible. rs: rising tuition fees, increasing reliance on student fees for operating budgets, endowments–to what extent do you see all these trends as part of a general divestment from the public sphere? nc: its partly general, but i think some of this is oriented specifically toward the universities. this hasn’t really been studied so i’m just telling you what i think. all of this stuff began in the 70’s. there were a lot of changes in the economy in the 70’s, but one crucial thing changed with regard to the universities. the late 60’s was a period of a lot of activism and it terrified the business world and it also terrified liberal intellectuals across the spectrum. they were terrified. “the students are out of control, there’s too much democracy, what are we going to do?” there’s some very interesting reactions that you can read. there are two main ones at the opposite ends of the spectrum and they’re worth looking up. one of them is a book and the other you can find on the internet. at the right end of the spectrum, we have the powell memo. lewis powell, was a corporate lawyer who became a justice of the supreme court, and he wrote a memorandum to the education committee of the chamber of commerce in 1971. his memorandum was essentially reflected the paranoia of the business world. the business world is basically totalitarian. they’re used to running everything, and if anything gets out of control the world is falling apart. that’s a typical aspect of the totalitarian mentality. it shows up in foreign policy and all over the place. so his perspective was that the whole university system, as well as the media, television, and even the government, had been taken over by raging marxist lunatics. all of this is so surreal if you know anything about the facts. you’d laugh if you didn’t understand that this is a natural perception of the totalitarian mentality. you can’t allow anything to get out of control, and its true, things were partially out of control. so herbert marcuse was teaching some students in harvard that ralph nader was popular, and to the business world that meant that all the world was falling apart. so powell wrote to the chamber of commerce, the main business lobby, saying we’ve got to do something to “restore | 261 the balance”. do something to make sure that in the universities, in television, in the media, there’s at least some small voice that says the united states is not nazi germany and maybe something in american history is not just extermination and massacre. powell says to the business world, look, we’re the trustees of the universities, we’re the ones who make the decisions, we provide the tax funds, and we own the media. we ought to mobilize instead of letting ralph nader and herbert marcuse steal the whole world away from us. we ought to mobilize and use our power to “restore the balance”. powell’s suggestions were followed by the business world in all kinds of ways, and i think one of them is raising tuitions. its at that time that tuition starts to go up. that’s a disciplinary technique. kids in the 60’s assumed, “i can take off for a couple of years and become a political activist and work for women’s rights or civil rights, then i can come back and pick up my career.” that’s a dangerous situation–it frees people to think and that’s a terrible idea. so what you want to do is trap them. maybe some guy thinks that he wants to be a public interest lawyer. if you make sure he comes out of law school $100,000 in debt, he’s going to go into a corporate law firm because he just has no choice. once he’s in there he’ll internalize the culture and he’ll be safe. it’s the same across the board. raising tuition is a disciplinary technique. so we have the powell memo on the right. on the other end of the spectrum, which is in a way even more interesting, there’s an important book called the crisis of democracy. it comes out in 1974 and it’s the first publication of the trilateral commission. (the trilateral commission brought together liberal internationalists in the three major state capitalist societies–north america, western europe, japan. to get the tenor of it that’s what the carter administration was drawn from.) well what’s the crisis of democracy? the crisis of democracy is that there’s too much democracy. segments of the population that are usually passive and apathetic and obedient are entering the public arena and pressing their demands–women, youth, the elderly, workers and farmers. the population, in other words, or what they call the special interests. and that’s too much pressure on the state. they can’t deal with all the special interests. they have to be beaten back to establish what they called more moderation in democracy. with regard to the schools it was quite interesting. they said that the institutions that are responsible for the indoctrination of an interview with noam chomsky democracy and the public university 262 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times the young are not doing their job. schools, universities, churches– they’re not indoctrinating the young properly.” (this is the liberals that i’m talking about!) “we’ve got to do something to make sure they indoctrinate the young properly.” then comes various suggestions. they even wanted to control the media, because they’re too adversarial and free. well the two ends of the political spectrum are almost identical and that tells you something. my strong suspicion is that the attacks on public universities, including things like tuition, quite possibly came out of this whole sort of mentality. it was related to things happening in the economy. this is the period in the 1970s when the postwar economy was being dismantled–we see moves towards financialization and the off shoring of production. a lot of things happened. this was one of them. they tried to re-impose discipline so we wouldn’t have problems from these students, who aren’t indoctrinated properly. i think there was a confluence of all these things and it’s led to the period of increasing repression which we’re living under in the schools and everywhere else. there is a cultural dimension to the transition happening in thte economy–the fear of student independence and the fear of freedom. freedom is a scary thing so you want to make sure people are properly indoctrinated and controlled. you have a lot of debt and not a lot of choices, you’re insecure–you can’t take chances. in fact if you listen to alan greenspan’s testimony to congress every year, he’s crowing about the wonderful economy he’s administering, and he says straight out its best feature is what he calls “growing worker insecurity.” that’s the best feature of the economy and that makes sense on his assumptions. growing worker insecurity means that working people are afraid to ask for a raise in wages, decent working conditions, for secure jobs and so on. they’ll just grab on to anything they can, and that’s great. it makes the economy more healthy by standard economic principles. so yes, growing worker insecurity is a great thing and it’s the same with students. if they’re insecure they’re not going to go out onto the streets and demand things, and think about things. my feeling is that all of this is tied together very closely. rs: so if students are disciplined by things like rising student debt and rising student fees, you could also argue that the people who are in charge of indoctrinating those students are also disciplined by this casualization of the labour force. nc: that’s right because you have to discipline both students and teachers. when the trilateral commission goes after the institutions | 263 responsible for the indoctrination for the young, they’re saying it’s the teachers, the ministers, church figures, the people in charge are out of control. they’re out of control so they have to be disciplined. and its called casualization of the labour force, or cut backs, threats to tenure, and so on. that is disciplining the faculty. academic freedom always had two aspects. the freedom to teach and the freedom to learn and you’ve got to cut them both back if you want to really control people. rs: i think that you have said that you are uneasy about the notion of a politically engaged university, but that you also think that universities have a responsibility to foster political engagement. could you say more about that? nc: well take mit. i didn’t think myself that mit ought to become involved in the anti-war movement. it’s not their job. nor did i think they should become involved in the war. if they’re going to develop technology for the military they ought to also be developing technology for guerilla resistance. but in fact they should be doing neither. however, the university should be an open arena for people to get involved, and as i said, mit was at the centre of academic anti-war resistance. i think it was 1968 that the whole university was closed down for a couple of weeks. a small number of students, including mike albert (who now runs z-net), steve shallow, and a few others decided to organize a sanctuary for deserters. that was the kind of thing going on then, mostly in churches. a kid decides he wants to desert, so you organize a sort of sanctuary and people stay with him until the fbi comes and takes him. i should say i was against it. i thought this was just going to crash but their intuition was much better. the deserter was a very interesting young guy from the marines. he knew what he was doing–he had had a lot of briefing, thought about it, knew the consequences, and he wanted to do it. they had a press conference in a room in the student centre and about five people showed up. in about three days the whole institute was closed down. there were thousands of students in the student centre twenty-four hours a day doing everything that students do–everything from smoking pot to having seminars. it was quite exciting. there were two weeks of really active engagement on campus and the institute was virtually closed. a lot of things came out of that experience. one thing that came out of it was the commission i was talking about earlier. another was that an interview with noam chomsky democracy and the public university 264 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times the institute itself officially devoted a full day just to consider the uses of technology in society. this is the main technological institute in the world and the question had never come up. so it was march 4th 1969. the day was set aside for meetings, discussions, rallies, all sorts of things on the uses of technology in society. one thing that came out of that day was the union of concerned scientists, which is still around and very active. the whole culture of the place changed, and it’s never going back to what it was. it’s not as active as it was back in 68 but it’s just a changed place. this is the kind of thing the university ought to be open to. it’s right for the university to concern itself with the uses of technology in society; it should be open to letting these issues be discussed and debated. the discussion that happened at mit had a very good impact broadly over all kinds of subjects. one of the biggest issues in toronto is the school of public affairs that is being endowed by peter munk, who is the head of barrick gold, a big gold mining company. what should be done? mining is an absolute international scandal, extremely destructive. it’s environmentally destructive, it’s destructive of communities all over the place and canada has the worst record in the world for this. gold mining is absolutely the worst. so i think that what monk and the global affairs institute ought to do is investigate mining–gold mining in particular. and don’t just investigate, but offer a voice for people who have no voice. you go down in the summer to visit remote and endangered communities in colombia and they’re trying to protect themselves from mining. they have no voice. nobody’s going to hear them but people here do have a voice and they can support them. that’s a perfectly fine research and teaching engagement for a university, and out of it can come pretty good actions. i think you see things like that all over the place. you’re not trapped by funders. they may want to carry out indoctrination of the young but it doesn’t mean they have to succeed. the limits of keyncsianism: some theoretical observations john malcolmson the history of advanced capitalism is the history of a statebuttressed, state-controlled and state-regulated capitalism. for this reason, it is no longer possible to speak of vital areas and processes which fall outside of this near pervasive blanket of state intervention. when seen in context, the expansion of the state sector and of state interventionism in general form part of a larger dynamic at work in the advanced capitalist economies. the growth of the service and repair sectors, the proliferation of intermediary functions, the emergence of a complex networv of advertising and marketing, the establishment of a growing research sector, the extension of consumer credit all of these developments and others reflect the increasing technical socialization of the labour process as well as the increasing complexity of the sphere of commodity circulation. all in all, advanced capitalism faces growing difficulties in its attempts to realize value (mandel, 1978: 401-3). the expansion of the state sector has absorbed much of the growth in some of these areas. together with the emergence of state planning and of extensive state involvement in the socialization of private sector costs and risks, this overall expansion can be seen as an attempt, by the state, to assist capital in the transcendence of those barriers it finds in its path. in other words, the state attempts to secure the social existence of capital through the mobilization of counter-tendencies to capitalist crisis. thus, despite changes in the nature of capitalism and changes in the nature of state activity, the specific modes of intervention still reflect the attempt to meet certain form-specific needs associated with the maintenance of the capitalist order. generally speaking, there is an inherent trend under late capitalism for the state to incorporate an ever greater number of productive and reproductive sectors into the 'general conditions of production' which it finances (mandel, 1978: 484). the origins of the modern interventionist state can be traced back to the immediate postwar period. the immediate problem facing capital and the state was one of conversion to a peacetime economy. it had taken a world war to lift international capitalism out of a decade of stagnation and unemployment, during which the social and political cohesion of the capitalist order faced serious challenge. experiences gained in managing a wartime economy had demonstrated the potential inherent in state intervention, i.e. the ability of the state to virtually end unemployment and to set the economy back on the course of expansion and growth. clearly, the lessons derived from these experiences were not lost on capital and the state. the conversion to a peacetime economy could not involve a return to the disruptive boom-bust cycle of earlier times. a dismantling of the war machine 88 could not lead to the threat of a sudden contraction of business activity. the best that might be hoped for was some sort of balance between private sector activity and public sector intervention, a balance that could assure those conditions necessary for continued capital investment and economic growth. these considerations demonstrate that the growth of state interventionism is not something that can be observed and analysed apart from an analysis of the balance of forces in the class struggle. the state's conversion to a program of fiscal and monetary management (of which commitment to a policy of full employment is but one aspect) was itself a reflection of the need to deflect working class opposition away from any radical alternative. steps taken in the construction of the welfare state symbolize the effort by the state to integrate labour into a postwar 'settlement' or consensus, something essential for the maintenance of relative stability and class harmony and for the attainment of economic growth. certain aspects of the welfare state can even be seen as tactical victories for the working class and its organizations, as instances where the working class has been able to "impose its political will on the logic of capital within capitalist relations" (altvater, 1976: 3). all of these factors suggest that the actual character of state intervention is something largely dependent upon the nature of the class struggle and its outcome (i.e. 'the relative contingency of the political process'). keynesian economics represents an attempt to guide and theorize the practice of state fiscal and monetary intervention in the advanced capitalist economies. to keynes, the laissez-faire liberal image of the state (i.e. the best state is that which governs least) was hopelessly inadequate in the face of chronic economic stagnation and 89 massive unemployment. classical economy had erred in assuming that the capitalist market was an inherently self-correcting mechanism and that any prolonged imbalance between supply and demand, producing unemployment or idle capacity, was impossible. in the keynesian system, the central postulate was that market equilibrium was possible at any level of employment, the latter being dependent upon the volume of effective demand. full employment is, therefore, not something towards which an economy will naturally tend. it is, rather an "optimum relationship" to be produced only by either "accident or design" (keynes, 1965: 28). the unimpeded interaction of market forces is something just as likely to produce stagnation as prosperity, a colossal wastage of resources instead of their efficient employment. thus, the ostensible object of government policy was the attainment of full employment via a policy of selective state intervention. the short term manipulation of key economic variables by the state is what is termed economic 'finetuning*, a practice designed to level out the disruptive boom-bust cycle of capitalism and to attain a state of permanent 'quasi-boom' . in the keynesian system, a given rate of investment and a given 2 'propensity to consume' will together bring forth an actual volume of effective demand which, in turn, will determine a definite level of employment consistent with economic equilibrium. when effective demand, the sum of the demand for capital and consumption goods, is equal to a nation's total income (i.e. total savings = total investments), the economic system will operate at a full employment equilibrium. if effective demand falters, then savings will exceed investments, total income will drop and unemployment will result. in setting forth this model, keynes was explicitly ressurecting the "great puzzle of effective demand" which, with ricardo, had vanished from the realm of 90 orthodox economic theory to lead a subterranean existence in the underworlds of gesell, douglas and marx (keynes, 1965: 32). and in doing so, keynes was concentrating his attack upon say's law, the idea of a selfequilibrating market. the mere fact that savings and investments may be defined the same way (as the excess of income over consumption) does not necessarily mean that the two will always tend to coincide in actual practice (keynes, 1965: 63, 83-4). the factors which determine the former are distinct and separate from those influencing the latter. in the final analysis, the nature of the equilibrium will depend upon the level of aggregate effective demand. in a mature capitalist economy, keynes felt there were valid reasons for suspecting that the level of effective demand would be insufficient to produce equilibrium at full employment. increased income will augment consumption but not by so much as the initial increase in income. keynes, (1965: 27) attributed this to the psychological propensity to consume consequent upon the increase in material affluence. therefore to increase and justify increased employment, there must be an amount of current investment sufficient to absorb the excess of total output over what the community chooses to consume when employment is at the given level. for unless there is this amount of investment, the receipts of the entrepreneurs will be less than is required to induce them to offer the given amount of employment (keynes, 1965: 27). thus, the question of investment was central to the keynesian model. the health of a mature capitalist economy depends upon the maintenance of an appropriate level of capital investment. acceptance of this principle leads, in keynes' mind, to the same conclusion as before, namely, that employment can only increase pari passu with an 91 increase in investment; unless, indeed, there is a change in the propensity to consume (1965: 98). however, as with consumption, a mature capitalist economy tended to throw up barriers to the productive investment of capital which served to weaken the incentive to invest on the part of the individual capitalist (i.e. the saturation of investment outlets, the declining marginal efficiency of capital etc.). additional factors such as the prevailing 'business mood' and the cost of borrowing might induce an investment strike as capital exercises a 'liquidity preference'. all in all, these factors held out the distinct possibility of a secular tendency to stagnation as the incentive to private investment weakened. the object of state policy, given these factors, was to ensure the attainment of a full employment equilibrium through the use of fiscal and monetary devices designed to strengthen both the incentive to invest as well as the society's 'propensity to consume'. here, the overriding importance of investment was clear. as david horowit: states (1973: 92) , by stressing the pre-eminent significance of the investment decision, in determining the level of output and employment, and by illuminating the dependence of that decision on the expectation of investors, keynes provided the key to a theory of fiscal politics which would show that the pattern of government spending must fall predominantly within the channels coincident with business interest. keynes was enough of a realist to know that any state authority that failed to provide the necessary framework for business expansion would soon find the economy in the throes of a major depression. indeed, it was the duty of the state to ensure that investment and accumulation materialized, even despite what might be the temporary whims of capital. keynes writes: it is not the ownership of the instruments of production which it is important for the state 92 to assume. if the state is able to determine the aggregate amount of resources .devoted to augmenting the instruments and the basic rate of reward to those who own them, it will have accomplished all that is necessary. moreover, the necessary measures of socialization can be introduced gradually and without a break in the general traditions of society (1965: 378). the object is therefore one of saving capitalism and for this reason it is completely erroneous to view keynes as a socialist. in the words of maurice dobb, despite an inclination epater les bourgeois and to patronize heretics, he went no further than the position of an interventist liberal, alive to the needs of his time (1977: 220). in practical terms, keynesian fiscal and monetary policy aims at the stimulation of both investment and consumption. "for it is unlikely," keynes writes, that full employment can be maintained, whatever we may do about investment, with the existing propensity to consume. there is room, therefore, for both policies to operate together; to promote investment and, at the same time, to promote consumption... i should readily concede that the wisest course is to advance on both fronts at once (1965: 325). to this end, the state should attune its monetary policy (lower interest rates, a flexible money supply) and its fiscal policy (taxation, subsidization, welfare spending etc.) in the attempt to surmount the overall deficiencies in the level of effective demand. keynes* approach to the problems of capital accumulation, with its emphasis upon the key variable, effective demand, is indicative of a highly abstract and ahistorical conceptualization of the nature of production founded upon capital. in general, the aggregates and categories used by keynes posit the essence of capitalist production as production for use and consumption, and not as production for value . "capital", writes keynes, "is not a self-subsistent entity existing apart from 93 consumption" (keynes, 1965: 106). consumption must be seen as the object and purpose of all economic activity (mattick, 1974: 11). the implications of this approach are far reaching in a number of areas. to take a concrete example, the keynesian concept of 'national income' (i.e. consumption investment) establishes a separation between its two major components only to blur the distinction by evaluating the significance of these components primarily in terms of their impact upon the level of effective demand. shigeto tsuru (1968: 194) wtites, the result is the keynesian concept of national income which has only one dimension, that of being consumable sooner or later . the part which is consumed during a given period is called 'consumption 1 , and the remainder in whatever physical form it may be, is called 'investment'. tsuru goes on to demonstrate that a methodology based upon what is essentially crude aggregation cannot accurately gauge what he terms the 'productivity effect' of consumption and investment, or the actual significance of consumption expenditure and investment outlays vis-a-vis the accumulation of capital. paul mattick (1974: 116) develops a similar point in greater detail in his discussion of the role of the 'multiplier* within the keynesian system. given the existence of idle capacity and unemployed workers during a depression, state expenditures are seen as 'pump priming' devices that stimulate a resumption of private sector business activity. an initial expenditure in the area of public works or welfare assistance initiates a chain reaction of subsequent expenditures (the precise quantitative dimensions of which depend upon the society's marginal propensity to consume), thereby multiplying the cumulative impact of the initial outlay. given this process, state expenditure might well be seen as a panacea whose curative powers are sufficient to overcome the shortfall in effective demand. 94 however, as mattick points out, there are serious problems inherent in the multiplier concept, which, in the final analysis, are rooted in the nature of state intervention and state spending within a capitalist economy. firstly, the multiplier concept creates the illusion... that any given amount of additional income can multiply itself merely by travelling from one group to another. actually, of course, this is not so, just as a change in the velocity of money does not imply a change in its quantity or in the quantity of commodities in circulation (mattick, 1974: 158). he adds that it is only when money spent in consumption finds its way into productive investment that any real increase in income takes place. secondly, a problem emerges because the state is not a capitalist and must therefore finance its activities out of revenue in the form of taxes, or out of borrowing. whereas the private sector is involved in the direct creation of surplus value, direct state involvement in production is usually confined to a series of non-productive enclaves vital for the economy as a whole but unprofitable for private investment and exploitation. for this reason, almost all forms of state expenditure must be seen as forms of consumption of surplus value within the context of the capitalist system as a whole. even in the case of government contracts with the private sector, the costs associated with this kind of induced production as well as the profits that accrue to the private suppliers must be financed out of taxes on the private productive base or out of borrowings against the future profitability of that same base (mattick, 1974: 118). in either case the state appropriates a portion of the surplus value generated in the private sector and for this reason alone state finance must be labelled unproductive from the standpoint of the whole system (yaffe, 1973: 51). 95 the multiplier effect of state spending is therefore largely illusory, despite the fact that the stimulus of government spending may help arrest a downward trend in business activity. mattick (1974: 1s9) notes that as state spending may ease unemployment and increase production in the private sector, it may under special conditions, induce an acceleration of private investments. if this should be the case, it would increase total income by more than that brought forth by deficit-spending, but this 'multiplication' would be due directly to the additional profitable investments, not to the initial spending. in the case of deficit spending, the overall complex of capitalist valorization problems find their expression in the cumulative growth of the national debt. attempts to rationalize this indebtedness usually rest upon the claim that a rising national income will offset the problems associated with increased borrowing and debt servicing. it is, however, impossible to gauge the stimulative impact of deficit financing if comparisons are made on the basis of total national income. as mattick states, the growing national debt cannot be related to total national income, but only to that part of the total which has not been injected into the economy by the government. it is by counting an expense as an income that the illusion arises that the growing national debt is neutralized by a rising national income (1974: 162). the upshot of this analysis may be summed up as follows. state spending can only be viewed as a consumption of surplus value, or better, a redistributive appropriation and consumption of surplus value with an aim to establish and maintain certain, historically-specific 'general material conditions of production' in the era of advanced capitalism. this expenditure cannot be viewed simply as one vital input amidst a complex of socially-necessary tasks and functions which together constitute 96 the system of production based upon capital. a perspective like this tends to abstract the technical aspects of an advanced division of labour away from the social relations which constitute capitalist production as a valorization process, and, in doing so, it loses sight of the fact that only labour undertaken within the capital relation can be productive of surplus value. the result is an analysis which downplays the limits of state intervention, which, ultimately, stem from the fact that the state is not a capitalist and that the state must therefore appropriate and consume surplus value in the course of its interventions. given this understanding, state expenditure and state intervention can best be seen as "indirectly productive for capital in the sense used by marx" they constitute essential moments apart from capital which, nonetheless, make a vital contribution to the social conditions of capitalist reproduction (fine and harris, 1976: 104-5). the limits of contemporary state intervention inhere in the very nature of the form-specific functions the state is called upon to provide within the context of advanced capitalism. the use of fiscal and monetary devices to attenuate the business cycle and prevent the re-emergence of dangerously high levels of unemployment has served to displace the locus of contradiction and crisis to the level of the state itself. the cumulative growth of public debt, the mounting burden of debt servicing and the bias of permanent inflation together represent the price paid by 'capital in general 1 for the maintenance of state-buttressed 'prosperity' amidst conditions of declining profitability in vital sectors and growing difficulties in the sphere of commodity circulation. state intervention in the form of 'demand management' and an expanded money supply has served to arrest the necessary destruction of excess capitals in the economic crisis and to hinder the concentration and 97 re-organization of the capital structure necessary for a profitable upswing in business activity (itoh, 1978: 6-7). the use of credit leverage and deficit financing to further this end has led to the current phenomenon of 'stagflation', a steady and seemingly inexorable rise in the cost of living amidst either sluggish or non-existent growth rates. all in all, capital in crisis stands in need of a depression, a 'shake-out' that the state dare not risk in view of its likely social and political consequences. the current strategy of keynesian intervention, based as it is upon the use of fiscal and monetary means for the redistribution of existing values, cannot penetrate to the heart of the matter for, as fine and harris note, "the dominant recuperative force in crisis is the re-organization of capital and not the redistribution of values" (1976: 111). given this situation, the efficacy of the keynesian devices is severely limited by the expansion of state debt on one side, and the risk of refuelling inflation without any substantial improvement in business activity, on the other (itoh, 1978: 9). the growing obsolescence of keynesianism is reflected in the fact that the current high level of unemployment does not basically result from the needs of distributional struggle (although this plays a secondary related role), but from the need for a break in the circuit of capital to release money, means of production and labour-power so that they can, at a later stage of the cycle, when the expansion capital's circuit is renewed, be re-employed in a circuit based on a re-structuring of productive capital (fine and harris, 1976: 112). in the meantime, the crisis of a state-buttressed capitalism increasingly manifests itself in a crisis of state finance. the stage is thus set for a round of spending cuts, as the state attempts to 'rationalize' its spending and taxation priorities to suit the valorization needs of capital (o'connor, 1973). in the long run, the continued existence of 98 the welfare state, as it is currently known, is placed in serious jeopardy. the current crisis of capital, the fiscal crisis of the state and the growing impotence of keynesian economics all point in the final analysis to the dynamic, yet crisis-ridden course of capitalist development. state intervention, as the continuous and ongoing management of vital economic processes, emerged in a particular conjuncture in response to particular social and economic pressures. for a certain specified period, the efficacy of this intervention was clearly seen and hence unquestioned. yet, the crisis of the 1970' s demonstrates that a state-managed and state-regulated capitalism is still capitalism, still subject to the inner laws of motion that characterize capitalist production, and still subject to the barriers and limits that inhere in the form of capital itself. for this reason, the growing obsolescence of the keynesian prescription can best be seen as reflecting the transition of the capitalist mode of production to a higher phase of development which, in turn, will posit the form-specific functions of the state in a new and qualitatively different manner. whatever the change in state fort! and function, it must, nevertheless, remain consistent with the fom of capital itself and the immanent necessities posited by this form. all in all, the state must always face up to the need of securing the political and social domination of capital and, in doing so, secure the social exsitence of capital itself. conclusion : post-keynesianism ? in a wall street journal story, dated september 6, 1974, the following statement is attributed to robert gordon, then president of the american economic association: under keynes' influence, we've developed a theory of aggregate demand but haven't even started to develop a theory of aggregate supply (quoted in morris, 1974: 3) 99 in its own way, an admission like this one reflects a growing feeling that keynesian economics, and modern economic theory in general, docs not provide adequate insight into basic problems regarding capital accumulation and production, problems made more acute with the current economic crisis. current state intervention and emerging future trends in this area also reflect this. given the predicament of 'stagflation 1 , the atmosphere is ripe for the state to undertake new departures in setting the economy back on track, departures that push state intervention beyond the ambit of traditional keynesian practice. massive cutbacks in health, education and social services, inroads into the collective bargaining process and controls on wage increases all mark the arrival of a new phase of state intervention. the precise nature and direction of this new phase is hard to determine as of yet, but it will likely involve efforts to redistribute income away from working-class consumption, to co-opt organized labour into surrendering gains made over decades of struggle and to mobilize state funds in the attempt to remove the structural barriers to sustained capital accumulation. an image of the future that lies in store for the western world might be drawn from an article in the october, 1974 issue of business week . in discussing the problems and imperatives facing american capitalism, the author reaches the following matter-of-fact conclusion : some people will obviously have to do with less... indeed, cities and states, the home mortgage market, small business and the consumer will all get less than they want because the basic health of the u.s. is based on the basic health of its corporations and banks: the biggest borrowers and the biggest lenders (quoted in sweezy and magdoff, 197s: 2). 100 notes there are basic problems involved in simply equating state intcrventionism with keynesianism. as has been stated, much of what came to constitute the keynesian prescription in practice dates back at least as far as world war i and, in addition, certain aspects of modern state practice cannot be traced back to keynes. in spite of this, keynesianism does represent a general theorization of state intervention in advanced capitalism. it is with this general connexion in mind that this paper is based upon the admittedly rather loose and simplistic identification of the two entities. keynes (1965: 8-10) defines 'propensity to consume' as the ensemble of subjective and objective factors that guide the consumption habits and the decision whether to spend or save of individuals and classes. ian gough (1975) argues that it is wrong to see state spending as non-productive for this reason. 101 rfffrf.ncf.s alvater, elmar 1976 "reproduction conditions of the capital relation and the bourgeois state" bulletin of the conference of socialist economists , 5, (1). dobb, maurice 1977 theories of value and distribution since adam smith . london: cambridge. fine, ben and laurence harris 1976 "'state expenditure in advanced capitalism: a critique" new left review, 98. gough, ian 1975 "state expenditures in advanced capitalism" new left review, 92. horowitz, david 1973 the fate of midas and other essays san francisco: ramparts. itoh, makato 1978 "the inflational crisis of world capitalism" capital and class, 4. keynes , john maynard 1965 the general theory of employment, interest and money . new york: harbinger. mandel, ernest 1978 late capitalism london: verso. mattick, paul 1974 marx and keynes • london: merlin. morris , jacob 1974 "stagflation" monthly review, 26, (7). o'connor, james 1973 the fiscal crisis of the statenew york: st. martins. 102 sweezy, paul and harry magdoff 1975 "the economic crisis in historical perspective, part ii" monthly review 26, (11). tsuru, shigeto 1968 "keynes versus marx: the methodology of aggregates" in david horowitz ed. , marx and modern economics new york: monthly review. yaffe, david 1973 "the crisis of profitability" new left review, 80. 103 236 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism beyond the economic crisis: the crisis in trade unionism — sam gindin1 the earlier contributions to this collection might be summarized as warning us that that things are going to get a lot worse before they get… worse.2 this is not just a matter of the sustained attacks on the labour movement but as much a reflection of the crisis within labour. for some three decades now, labour has been stumbling on, unable to organizationally or ideologically rebut the attacks summarized as ‘neoliberalism’. though the great financial crisis held out the promise of finally exposing the right and its supporters and potentially opening the door to a union offensive and possible revival, the attacks on labour in actuality intensified and labour continues to have no coherent counter-response. as a prelude to directly addressing that impasse in labour, it is useful to begin with something that greg albo (2012) posed in his presentation to the conference forerunner to this collection: what is the larger historical significance of this particular crisis? though cyclical downturns are common in capitalism, structural crises are of relatively rare occurrence, generally separated by a generation or so (30 years or more).3 such crises reflect social and institutional barriers that block capitalism’s normal continuation, and the question for capital and its governments then becomes what, if anything, might take capitalism to a new stage that allows for the resumption of its drive. for example, the outcome of the crisis that began at the end of the 1960s and ran through the 1 sam gindin retired from the canadian auto workers’ union in 2000 after 27 years on staff, the last 16 as assistant to the president. from 2001 through 2011 he was the visiting packer chair in social justice at york university, toronto. 2 see also the presentations from the conference: the global economic crisis and canadian austerity: perception versus reality available at http://www.alternateroutes.ca/index.php/ar/ pages/view/video 3 it is common to identify three structural crises in capitalism before the latest one: the first occurring in the last quarter of the 19th century, the second introduced by the 1929 stock market crash and lasting through the 1930s, the third breaking out in the late 1960s and running through the 1970s. see panitch and gindin, 2011. beyond the economic crisis | 237 1970’s was first and foremost that the earlier strength of labour was broken. as well, finance was liberalized, globalization was accelerated, and the state was restructured – not weakened or withdrawn to the end of establishing more autonomy from popular pressures and therefore actually emerging stronger in terms of supporting private accumulation. the resolution of that crisis, in short, set the conditions and contradictions that frame the crisis we face today (panitch and gindin, 2012). four aspects of this present crisis seem especially significant. first, in spite of the domestic and international turmoil there has been remarkably little challenge to globalization and free trade. contrast this with the last time we had a crisis this deep, in the 1930’s, when protectionist sentiments were strong and common, and capitalism as an international system seemed threatened. yet today, no country has placed exiting global capitalism on the agenda.4 the issue, rather, is that with globalization taken for granted, how can crises, particularly the financial crises linked to the expansion of global capitalism, be contained (i.e. managed). this brings us to a second facet of the crisis. in spite of a general understanding that private bankers and other financial institutions were responsible for the crisis, the solution to the crisis is not to weaken but strengthen them and to develop the state capacities to contain – not end future volatility. we need to understand this not as a matter of stupidity or corruption (though both play a role!), but as a reflection of the structural importance of finance to capitalism as a whole. we often separate finance from the rest of the system and describe it as a speculative parasite (jim stanford (2012, in an otherwise valuable presentation, tended to do this as well). but if that were the case, we should have expected divisions within the capitalist class with the rest of capital, suffering in terms of stagnating markets, ready to join the attack on finance. instead, there has been remarkably little evidence of splits between financial capital and the rest. this reflects the extent to which finance and industry are in fact tightly integrated. it is not so much that large industrial corporations need daily credit since they have more profits and cash than they know what to do with but rather the importance of credit to mergers and restructuring, the need on the part of global corporations for specialized financial services to ease trade and limit exchange rate risks and other uncertainties, the discipline financial markets impose on workers, states, and capital itself to be true to the priorities of profits and private 4 even in greece, syriza (the leading left opposition group) has emphasized the need to modify, not transform, greece’s relationship to the international economy and has posed exit from the euro not as a goal, but as a reluctant option if the counter-productive austerity pressures continue. 238 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism capital accumulation, and in the case of the us its special access to the world’s savings. the contradiction lies in the fact that on the one hand all of capital would like finance to be less volatile and more orderly, but they don’t want to see it regulated to the point that they lose the advantages that global finance has brought them. a third aspect of the crisis is, as greg albo (2012) emphasized, the tendencies across countries towards a more authoritarian state. this has been most dramatic in europe where external institutions have placed ‘technical experts’ at the head of government to carry out ‘reforms’ but is also seen in the legislation essentially trying to outlaw protest in the student strike in quebec. this is part of a more general trend towards states gaining more autonomy from the electorate to do what’s necessary for capital accumulation. and it has especially emerged in regard to the fourth aspect, downsizing social services and attacking public sector unions, generally the last standing bastion of trade unionism. in this regard, the story of labour’s defeat doesn’t go back just to the 1970’s but to the immediate postwar period when the left inside and outside the labour movement was marginalized. in spite of that defeat, trade unionism was able to make gains, real gains, for a while. but that defeat of the left came with a loss of capacities critical to understanding, strategizing, and mobilizing. and when capitalism changed and now identified past labour gains as a barrier to continued progress, labour no longer had the capacity to resist. so the second defeat of labour, taking place through the 1980’s and 1990’s, shifted from that of a small but influential left to trade unionism as a whole, especially the private sector. today, capital is trying to consolidate and complete that defeat by going after the public sector and ensuring that it does not inspire any positive examples for private sector workers. a central aspect of this three decades long assault on the labour movement has been a profound lowering of expectations. the intensification of competition from the third world seems to have set boundaries on worker demands, even though most of our trade is still with the developed countries and most workers are now employed in private and public services, sectors not directly limited by trade. greater globalization seemed to place possible government responses beyond the reach of domestic politics, even though it was states that endorsed globalization (and can potentially also check it). the state-endorsed defeats workers suffered left many of them angry but still redefining what might be considered ‘success’. the world we criticized so strongly a short while ago was now looked back on with nostalgia. beyond the economic crisis | 239 herman rosenfeld (2012; this issue) captures this shift when he asks why responses that seemed so obvious in an earlier era are now so out of bounds (like rejecting a plant takeover at caterpillar in contrast to the takeover, with less provocation, in the early 1990s). this shift in what is possible in terms of both goals and tactics highlights the cultural change in the labour movement. talk to any worker and you don’t have to convince them that capitalism doesn’t work for them. they know that, but believe they just can’t do anything about it. confidence in resistance, let alone change, is at an all-time low. fatalism is now the dominant mood and the main barrier to fighting back. to some the stagnation of trade unions is often explained in terms of bureaucratization and the thin democracy characteristic of unions (even though relative to other institutions, unions democracy still compares very favorably). but as significant as such aspects are, they do not get to the core of the ‘union problem’. as steve tufts and mark thomas (2012) noted in terms of their discussion of populism, you can have a very militant and democratic movement but it can also end up being very particularistic (‘militant particularism’, in the phrase used by raymond williams (1989) and elaborated by david harvey (1996)). workers can, for example, demand militancy but also insist that their union concentrate entirely and narrowly on defending the workers that finance its operations and not only ignore the plight of other workers such as the poor or new immigrants and even join in the attacks on them. such sectionalism highlights the fact that though unions emerged out of the working class, they are not class organizations in the sense of representing the class as a whole. that sectionalism is directly tied to the issue of bureaucratization and limited democracy. if members see their unions as insurance agencies – instrumental organizations paid for by dues – they won’t be looking for more participation but only that they get the service ‘contracted for’. correspondingly, leaders don’t see much priority in developing and mobilizing the capacities of workers – never mind raising expectations and putting more pressure on themselves – and so look to developing only that level of democracy, tempered by ‘loyalty’, to achieve a level of gains that doesn’t undermine their leadership. there was a time when that narrow solidarity of unions didn’t hinder unions all that much; they made gains and those gains even spread to other workers and the community. but that era is over. the notion that workers can survive and defend past achievements, let alone make new gains, through just looking after their own with no larger understanding of the common attacks all workers face and their mutual dependence 240 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism on the rest of the working class, is now daily exposed. absent a class perspective unions can today neither defend their members nor come to grips with how to renew themselves. consider organizing. only a broader sense of building the class will lead to the commitment of resources and voluntary energy to unionize in the present hostile climate. moreover, making breakthroughs in the new sectors where the majority of workers are now employed is unlikely to occur without cooperation across unions. the present competition for union dues dollars blocks such cooperation and ends up undermining each union. it too can only come from recognizing that the issue isn’t the growth of any particular institution – canadian auto workers, united steel workers, canadian union of public employees or ontario public service employees union – but that of building the working class as a social force. and it is only when we start from the class perspective that other creative approaches, like bringing individual workers into a union culture whether or not they have a bargaining unit. 5 or consider bargaining. in the 2012 round of the canadian union of public employees (cupe) bargaining with the city of toronto, individual cupe locals bargained with the municipal state. it was obvious enough that the bargaining had ramifications for all cupe members and of course workers beyond cupe. yet there was no explicit acknowledgment that individual locals can’t win against the state and that coordination across the union – itself a step towards winning other workers and their communities over was paramount. a coordinated strategy might have put the library workers, the workers with the greatest support, first out of the gate. it might have then contemplated selective tactical strikes, escalating to mass mobilizations and eventually bringing in the rest of the public sector while also mobilizing the community around the services provided. the point is that the only way union renewal can happen in the public sector, is to recognize what workers are up against, the extent to which the state’s focus is on isolating them, that it is the state itself and not ‘an employer’ the union is fighting, and establish itself as the leader in the fight to defend and expand social services. this is not easy; it requires a transformation of everything about public sector unions. it is not a matter of simply passing strong resolutions and putting up expensive billboards. the public is – understandably too cynical to be moved by public relations alone. 5 the canadian auto workers and communications, energy and paperworkers union, in preparation for their merger, recently announced their enthusiasm for such an approach. see caw-cep, 2012 beyond the economic crisis | 241 rather, it means rethinking union strategic priorities, rethinking the role of staff and their subsequent training, and coming to see union members as potential organizers for moving the public and shifting research and education to that end. it means not just defensively insisting that the public sector is ‘good’ but also being at the forefront of criticizing its bureaucratization and waste through acting as whistleblowers actively defending the public. and it even means moving to place the level, quality and administration of social services on the bargaining table (in the last municipal strike, for example, might not the municipal workers have emerged more successful, with greater protection for their members, if their primary bargaining demand – the one they might strike for – was keeping garbage services public rather than handing them over to profit-hungry and service-poor multinational corporations?). finally, it means creatively addressing the contradiction that traditional strike tactics now isolate workers from the public while it is so crucial to win that public over: e.g. dumping garbage during strikes not in parks but on bay street to make the connection between austerity and finance; continuing bus service but not collecting fares; delivering, as cupw did in the 1990s, pension and welfare checks even though on strike.6 a class perspective is likewise central to union renewal in the private sector. here the fundamental issue revolves around jobs. the function of unions is to negotiate the sale of labour power yet the greatest concern of workers is something unions have little or no input into – the existence of jobs in the first place. unless unions can deal with workers’ prime concern, union renewal can’t happen and even the bargaining position of unions will be further eroded as workers, facing the alternative of indefinite unemployment or a very much inferior level of pay and benefits, end up vulnerable to making concessions in a vain attempt to protect their jobs.7 a number of things follow from any emphasis on seriously dealing with the jobs issue. toby sanger (2012; this issue) flagged one of them in noting that in not adequately reinvesting its profits in decent jobs, the private sector is openly admitting that it can’t provide decent jobs 6 for a discussion of such an alternative strike tactics, which at least set the stage for when traditional strikes become necessary, see hurley and gindin, 2012. 7 one particular concession that reflects the logic of thinking instrumentally and undermines even the internal solidarity in unions is passing concessions on to future workers by agreeing to lower wages for new hires (as recently occurred at the lear siegler plant in kitchener). this not only undercuts the union principle of equal pay for equal work but open the way for the next generation of workers using that ‘lesson’ to in turn betray retirees. and since the very first experience of the very workers on whom union revival will critically depend is to see unionism at its least solidaristic, it virtually guarantees its failure. 242 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism for everyone. jobs must therefore depend on an expanded public sector, including into spaces that were formerly seen as inherently private. that is, it’s not just a matter of keeping health care in the public domain and not outsourcing it, but also thinking in new ways about sectors like auto. for one thing, we can’t build new alliances if we’re calling for subsidies for gm and the rest of the industry while social services are being cut. moreover, those subsidies won’t, as we’ve seen deliver jobs because productivity in the auto industry keeps rising while the market is limited – and a push for far ‘more cars’ is also not a viable strategy given the already overwhelming traffic congestion and environmental concerns. on the other hand there is enormous productive capacity in all of those facilities and worker skills; they can make the widest range of things that we do need. what needs to be placed on the agenda, by unions above all, is the waste of closing them when they could be converted to producing socially useful goods, starting with the environment. taking the environmental crisis seriously means the entire material foundation of society will have to be changed: the transportation and communication infrastructure, the machinery and tools in every factory, the construction of homes and appliances, offices and equipment everything. this means explicitly talking about preserving our productive potential not gm and ford, planning instead of competition, asking about social utility not profit. we obviously can’t win this right now, but it poses the question of how we organize today so this becomes a real option down the road. as radical as this sounds it’s worth remembering that in the second world war, canada and the us demonstrated a astonishing capacity to convert facilities in a remarkably short time and then reconvert them again after the war. as fundamental as internal changes are to union renewal, this is only a step to changing the external environment facing workers. and in this regard, we can’t just lament the power of the financial system over our lives and occasional shale our fists at them. we need to question why, in an allegedly democratic society, they stand above us – profiting enormously in good times, blackmailing us to bail them out in bad, and always insisting that what is good for banks should frame public policy. if they are in fact to be treated as having the weight of essentially being ‘public utilities’, they should be taken over and become democratic public utilities. this is not just a matter of ideology; it is a practical issue. if we really want to convert industry, if we really want to defend the public sector, if we want to chart what kind of society we want to have, controlling finance is a precondition. otherwise, we’ll remain in the beyond the economic crisis | 243 trap of catering to them and being disciplined by them whether it’s in the workplace or in terms of government policy. here again, taking on such a fundamental part of the canadian power establishment is not something that will happen just because we assert its need. but unless we begin to talk about it now, educate around it and mobilize for it, it will always be out of reach. in criticizing the labour movement for its failure to change, it is vital to understand this as being as much a failure of the left itself; the crisis of labour and that of the left go hand in hand. there’s a strong case to be made that we will not see a renewal of the labour movement unless there’s also simultaneously a renewal of the left. it seems clear enough that in spite of some positive developments, the leadership of the trade union movement has neither the inclination nor capacity to radically transform their organizations while the membership is too fragmented and too overwhelmed to sustain anything but the occasional sporadic rebellion. for rank and file workers to do more will require the resources and support from a left with feet both inside and outside unions that can link workers across workplaces, clarify what workers face and why a class response is critical to what workers now face. what, more specifically, might be done? one initiative that came out of the crisis was the establishment of the greater toronto workers assembly. it was inspired by two realities. first, that the formation of a new socialist party was simply not on the agenda until a stronger labour base was laid. second, the fact that, as noted earlier, out of the last comparable crisis – the depression of the 1930s a new form of working class organization was born and this pointed to the challenge today. the craft unionism that dominated working class organization at that time was inadequate to what workers faced and in a remarkable act of working class creativity, industrial unionism emerged as a dynamic alternative. today we need to think just as honestly and creatively about whether unions in their present form are adequate. it’s not that unions are going to disappear; they will continue to soldier on and occasionally demonstrate their potential, but on their own unions are simply not enough to deal with what workers face. the greater toronto worker assembly was an attempt to think about a form of working class organization that could support union renewal but also act beyond unions.8 it was anti-capitalist, not a coalition but organization of individuals looking for another kind of politics that was class based. it defined class very broadly to include not just the minority of 8 see www.workersassembly.ca 244 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism workers who are unionized, but the unemployed, the poor, and lowwage non-union workers. and it included all the dimensions of our lives that reflect class outside of the workplace. one especially important goal of the assembly in terms of union renewal – one it remains a long way from achieving – was to establish networks of activists across workplaces. this might take the form of fight back committees in every local that are focused on educating their own members, establishing links to the community, and engaging in joint solidarity actions.9 the role of the assembly would be to facilitate the formation of such committees, contribute to organizing the crossworkplace educationals and training, hold forums where experiences could be shared and generally support the development of groups of activists who, among other things, would also fight to inject a class perspective into their unions (gindin, 2012). let me conclude with three observations. first, the argument that ‘there is no alternative’ (tina) is actually true in the sense that moderate options simply can’t stand up to what we today face in capitalism. options have been radicalized and we need to recognize and confidently assert is that the radical is now the only thing that’s practical. directly related to this, we now have to think bigger even to win small. even if we just hoped to defend what we have, the lesson of the past quarter century is clearly that tinkering around the edges or being modest will protect us. either we think more radically and bigger or things will continue to get worse. finally, what we face is an organizational barrier. if we understand the inactivity of workers as reflecting their fatalism, their sense that nothing can be done, then this can only be addressed by concretely demonstrating the potentials of organized collective action. workers aren’t inherently radical and they’re not inherently conservative; they adapt to the structured options they face. once they are convinced that organizations exist that hold out some confidence that struggle can change things, even if that will take time, workers will be there. it’s in this regard that the socialist left has failed over the last quarter-century, and it is this organizational challenge that identifies the principal current challenge for the left. 9 a group of locals in the airline industry in toronto (including locals from the international association of machinists and aerospace workers, the caw and cupe) have been working together with some other non-airline locals (particularly in the municipal sector) to support each other in conflicts, do joint educationals, and strategize. beyond the economic crisis | 245 references albo, g. (2012, march 23). the state and exists from the crisis. conference presentation. the global economic crisis and canada austerity, alternate routes, ryerson university. http://www.alternateroutes.ca/ index.php/ar/pages/view/global%20economic%20 crisis%20%26%20 canadian%20austerity caw-cep. (2012, august). towards a new union: caw-cep proposal committee final report. http://www.newunionproject.ca/wpcontent/ uploads/2012/08/final.report.pdf. gindin, s. (forthcoming, 2012). rethinking unions, registering socialism. socialist register, 2013. london: merlin press. harvey, d. (1996). justice, nature and the geography of difference. oxford: blackwell. hurley, m. and s. gindin. (2011). the assault on public services: will unions lament the attacks or lead the fightback? the bullet. http:// www.socialistproject.ca/bullet/516.php panitch, l. and s. gindin. (2011). capitalist crises and the crisis this time. in panitch, l., g. albo and v. chibber (eds.), the crisis this time, socialist register (p.120). london: merlin. panitch, l. and s. gindin. (2012). the making of global capitalism: the political economy of american empire. new york: verso. rosenfeld, h. (2012, march 23). cat closure: what have we lost? what can we learn? conference presentation. the global economic crisis and canada austerity, alternate routes, ryerson university. http://www. alternateroutes.ca/index.php/ar/pages/view/global%20economic%20 crisis%20%26%20canadian%20austerity sanger, t. (2012, march 23). public finance, pensions and p3’s. conference presentation. the global economic crisis and canada austerity, alternate routes, ryerson university. http://www.alternateroutes.ca/ index.php/ar/pages/view/global%20economic%20 crisis%20%26%20 canadian%20austerity stanford, j. (2012, march 23). canadian (non)exceptionalism: crisis, recovery, austerity. conference presentation. the global economic crisis and canada austerity, alternate routes, ryerson university. http://www. alternateroutes.ca/index.php/ar/pages/view/global%20economic%20 crisis%20%26%20canadian%20austerity thomas, m.p. and s. tufts. (2012, march 23). uneven worker power and the populism-austerity-labour nexus. conference presentation. the global economic crisis and canada austerity, alternate routes, ryerson university. http://www.alternateroutes.ca/index.php/ar/pages/view/ global%20economic%20 crisis%20%26%20canadian%20austerity williams, r. (1989). resources of hope. new york: verso. climate change and crisis | 215 climate change and crisis: in dialogue with simon dalby — jen wyre jen wrye1 (jw): since the economic collapse, spending on environmental programs has decreased around the globe. can you comment on the similarities and differences in such reductions between canada and the u.s. or eurozone? simon dalby2 (sd): in general environmental programs may have suffered but clearly european states remain much more concerned about environmental matters than at least the federal governments in both the u.s., given republican agendas, and canada, given the conservatives’ agenda. however, that said, other jurisdictions do have a very varied response. california’s climate change agenda is completely different from washington’s even if austerity is the order of the day there. if you count in such things as obama’s green jobs initiatives then things look rather different in the u.s.. europeans, and even ontario in the canadian federation, are working on initiatives that, while not traditional environmental regulations, are nonetheless important in terms of the larger climate change issue in particular. jw: how ideologically driven are cuts to environmental spending, canada’s abandonment of kyoto commitments, etc.? are the circumstances 1 jen wrye recently completed her ph.d. at the department of sociology and anthropology, carleton university. she now teaches in the humanities and social sciences department at north island college in courtenay, british columbia. 2 simon dalby holds the cigi chair in the political economy of climate change, and is professor of geography and environmental studies at wilfrid laurier university. his published research deals with climate change, political ecology, geopolitics, global security, environmental change, militarization and the spatial dimensions of governance. he is co-editor of rethinking geopolitics, the geopolitics reader, the journal geopolitics, and author of creating the second cold war, environmental security, and security and environmental change. 216 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism a reflection of the conservative government mainly or do you see these tendencies as part of broader transnational and neoliberal restructuring? sd: the canadian conservative government is particularly clear that its agenda is ideologically driven. yes, there is a certain structural dimension in the canadian political economy as resource extraction is a key part of the national economy. canada is also home, through both the toronto and vancouver stock exchanges, to many of the largest international mining companies. some of these companies are more concerned about their environmental records than the conservatives apparently are, and indeed if environmental standards are abandoned in canada, exporting may actually get more complicated given international standards on many things such things as food safety standards. abandoning kyoto is clearly ideologically driven, but in line with the anti-multilateralism of the conservatives, expressed in foreign minister john baird’s formulations of enlightened sovereignty quite as much as its anti-environmental agenda. in the so called stimulus package the federal government could have chosen to push hard on renewable energies, sensible public transit initiatives in canadian cities and other projects, and fund these by removing subsidies to the petroleum sector, but they ignored these opportunities to shift investment to build green projects. instead canada is portrayed as an energy superpower given its tar sands, although how much of this oil will make its way to international markets remains unclear given the difficulties with various pipeline projects. jw: can you highlight some of the environmental consequences to austerity we might expect in canada? for example, which communities might be impacted most? sd: if austerity is about reducing environmental reviews of numerous proposed mines, pipeline and other resource extraction “developments” then clearly communities close to such developments obviously are most likely to have to deal directly with the disruption of developments and subsequent habitat disruption and pollution issues. in terms of forgone green building initiatives and modernization of infrastructure then the effects are likely to be widespread. the big unknown in the next few years is of course how much of the reduction of federal activity will be taken up by the provinces. that depends on provincial politics in complicated ways. but clearly the gutting of federal environmental science programs and environmental reviews isn’t about austerity; that at least climate change and crisis | 217 is clearly an ideologically driven agenda to silence the production of information that might challenge the priority of promoting the resource extraction sector as the key to canadian prosperity. jw: there seem to be conflict between an austerity agenda that diminishes environmental spending on one hand, and the need, as the frequency and scale of environmental catastrophes increases, to prioritize the environment politically on the other. what types of responses might we anticipate to these events if state spending is retracting? sd: gradually it is dawning on policy makers in municipalities and provinces that the federal government can’t be relied on to help in ways that it used to. pretending that companies and contractors can step in to deal with floods or oil spills in the absence of resources and coordination from the federal government is a very dangerous way to conduct public policy. the neoliberal ideology that markets can provide and that government should have no role in many aspects of public life leads to the reduction of facilities and capabilities in ways that may imperil people in coming years. can municipalities and provinces agree to pool resources to compensate for the withdrawal of federal support? that remains to be seen, but as all the predictions of climate change make clear, extreme events are becoming more frequent. but some of the most important things that need to be done to prepare for what is coming are simple practical matters of sensible land use planning and building resilient emergency systems and infrastructure. if short-term market priorities continue to be the priority the prognosis isn’t good, especially if self-regulation in the construction sector leads to shoddy construction and bad planning decisions. marketizing risk in terms of catastrophe bonds, and relying on insurance for many things is logical if markets and adaptation are the policy priority. this leaves those without financial resources especially vulnerable when government programs are withdrawn. jw: the united nations anticipates that austerity will reduce environmental spending by up to $50 billion in the foreseeable future. what do you think this will mean for global human security, particularly in the global south? sd: this issue has to be handled very carefully given that some of the projects, such as community forestry projects funded by various 218 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism international development schemes, are dubious both in terms of their environmental and local community impacts. forestry plantations that are claimed to be carbon sinks are not always helpful to local communities and indeed one might argue that canceling some of these might actually be beneficial in many parts of the south. if the cuts affect urban infrastructure, flood prevention measures and such things then the security of many poor people are further imperiled. jw: how do you think ideas about a ‘depressed’ economy and austerity affect people’s opinions about environmental problems? does austerity shift public attention from environmental degradation and sustainability? for example, do we stop thinking in terms of reducing our dependency on non-renewable resources, curbing resource use, or funding green initiatives and more in terms of maintaining our current lifestyle as is? sd: constraints often have perverse consequences for the environment; reduced economic activity frequently reduces pollution and resource use. it may also prevent modernization projects that use cleaner technologies, meaning that old polluting technologies are used longer than might otherwise be the case. traditionally hard times have meant environmental matters slip down the list of political priorities; environment being seen as a matter of a luxury for affluent times. but the relationships are never that simple; and efficiency responses often reduce resource consumption and hence pollution. jw: which strategies might you expect to be most successful in resisting cuts to environmental investments? sd: in the canadian context electing tom mulcair as prime minister might seem to be the most obvious strategy! but clearly some of the ecological modernization arguments are important. efficiency matters in things like heating bills and electricity consumption for schools, hospitals and numerous parts of the public sector. conservation in such matters helps in dealing with controlling costs in all aspects of economic activity. what seems to be happening across the globe is that numerous institutions are starting to think much more carefully about their fuel use in terms of travel budgets and the running costs of factories, housing and numerous other things. here in fact neo-liberal mantras about efficiency do make environmental sense. but austerity will no doubt affect new innovative investments that might be cleaner alternatives to existing systems. climate change and crisis | 219 the key to all this remains the ability of the political left to articulate a clear vision of a more just future that is also one that uses less resources than the production systems of the past. in times of austerity unions are often politically boxed into fighting to protect existing jobs, even in “dirty” industries rather than trying to articulate a larger agenda of green jobs and public investments. this is what many green parties have tried to promote, but often ended up too close to the market ideologies of neo-liberalism, and too focused on the narrow technicalities of environment to produce a convincing alternative narrative that can challenge the ideologies of neoliberalism combined by the re-articulation of citizenship in terms of consumption and “life-style”. challenging this discourse of “entitlement” remains a key ideological task for those who think that a more just and less destructive mode of political economy is both necessary and possible. 131 "class analysis and technological determinism" ken campbell the role of technology and its interaction with other elements of social structure has been one of the least examined questions in social theory. as gordon (1976:35) has recently pointed out, there is a strong streak of technological determirism in both non-marxist and orthodox marxist literature. but, for numerous reasons, the charge of 'technological' or 'economic determinism" has been levelled far more commonly at marxist theory. rarely does one encounter an equivalent assessment of weberian theory, although it can be shown* that the weberian literature is heavily imbued with technological determinist assumptions. in large part, the assumptions of technological determinism which underly the weberian view have been obscured by the emphasis which weber and later weberian writers place on subjective and non-economi c factors in social life. it has generally been assumed that this emphasis in some way contradicts the assumptions of a technological determinist view. in fact, this is not the case. technological determinism is not a theory that defines the immediate motives of men as economic; indeed, it implies no psychological theory at all. rather, it assumes that technological and scientific progress exert a determining influence over social institutions, that technological development determines the division of labour, and that social development can best be understood in terms of technological advance. more concretely, it assumes that the modern organization of work — the division of labour within industry, the existence of various levels of skilled labour and th •the argument of this paper has been compressed from a much more lengthy review of the marxist and weberian concept of class and the division of labour. if its arguments appear assertive, rather than demons tat ivc , this — at least in p^rt— is due to the limitations of the present oresentati"' 132 growth of administrative hierarchies — are determined by the exigencies of advancing technique, i.e., by the technical requirements of modern industrial production. as a number of writers have observed, weber's views on class and the division of labour are heavily imbued with the assumptions of technological determinism (see johnson, 1976:5-8; also navarro, 1976:34). many features of social organization (the growth of bureaucracy, for example) were viewed by weber as the product of technological development and the technical demands of an industrial economy.! the concept of 'legal-rational' authority, around which weber's views on bureaucracy revolve, is a typification of the type of normative (value) structure presumably imposed by the technical imperatives of expanding technique. this concept expresses all that is essential to the weberian tradition: the view that social development is a process of "cumulative technological rationalization" (see gerth and mills', 1967:51). according to this principle, history can be viewed as the gradual, if uneven, emergence of social forms corresponding to an increasingly complex technique and its requirements. recent theoretical works within the weberian tradition remain completely wedded to this technological de termini st outlook. two recent, and popular works, frank parkin's class inequality and political order (1972) and anthony giddens' the class structure of the advanced societies (1973) exemplify the reliance upon technological determinist assumptions which characterizes much of modern sociology. both these writers address themselves directly to class inequality in capitalist societies, yet fail to adequately conceptualize their subject matter precisely because they accept the division of labour as (technologically) given. 1. according to weber, bureaucracy can be viewed as a technica 1 requirement of complex organization, i.e., it is technologically determined. "the decisive reason for the advance of bureaucratic organization has always been its purely technical superiority over any other form of organization" (1968:973) 133 on an immediate level, this is evident in the inability of parkin and giddens to move beyond a description of immediate market processes in their attempt to account for class inequality. class differences, according to these authors, arise from differences in skills, education, and expertise and the mannner in which these potential resourses are actualized by the market. parkin argues that differences in class position (which he defines, after weber, as *\narket position") are determined by the skills and knowledge necessary for performing different occupational roles. marketable expertise is the single most important determinant of occupational reward. . . . the greater the skills or knowledge commanded by an occupation, the greater is its relative scarcity in the market place (1972:21) similarly, for giddens, class differences derive from differences in skill and education ( conceptualized as different "market capacities") .... possession of recognized 'skills' — including educational qualifications — is the major factor influencing market capacity. (1973:103) parkin and giddens thus offer an "explanation" of class differences which focuses upon the occupational ly relevant characteristics (skills, education, expertise, etc) of class agents. the suggestion that class differences (i.e., differences in market position) are determined by differences in skill and education level is singularly uninstructive as an explanation of class inequality the attempt to explain class differences in terms of differences in skills and education merely pushes the need for explanation one step further back. if class di f ference s are determined by differences in skill and education, what (one must ask) are the factors that determine differences in skill level? the existence of differentially skilled labour-power is hardly something that can be taken for granted in class analysis, especially when these differences are thought to account for class inequality. differences in skill are not the "givens" around which the class structure is built; these differences broadly correspond to positions in the social division of labour, the determining conditions of which must themselves be theorized . concretely, it is necessary to ask what are the determinants of the modern division of labour which requires differentially qualified labour-power. the failure of parkin and giddens to theorize the problem at this level (i.e., to relate skills to specific positions within production and to analyze the development and inter-relation of thes -» positions ) is readily explained by the technological determinist outlook which informs their treatmentss giddens, in fact, is reasonably clear on this point. the division of labour and the in industry, structure of "paratechnical relations"a he argues, corresponds to , the level of industrial development; under these conditions a "wholesale reorganization" of the division of labour is quite impossible. in an argument not fundamentally different from that earlier advanced by dahrendorf (19 5 9:36-41), giddens charges marx with failing to recognize that many of the features of the capitalist division of labour are, in fact, features of industrialism per se , not a product of antagonistic relations of production (p . 136 ),_this is another way of saying that the modern division of labour is technologically determined, and that marx erred in not recognizing this, 135 parkin is far less direct in his treatment of these questions. like giddens, he is critical of so-called "technocratic" and "convergence" writers who assume a direct and inevi table correspondence between the level of technological development and social structure. he argues that "rewards" within the occupational structure and access (mobility) within the class structure are variable i.e., not technologically determined ( p. 140-159). yet, as a criticism of technocratic writers, this argument remains weak, for it fails, in any way, to question the theoretical foundation of technocratic theory: a technological determinist explanation of the division of labour . insofar as it accepts the existing division of labour and corresponding skill differentials as given, parkin's argument implicitly falls back upon a technological determinist explanation of these phenomena. is the division of labour in capitalist societies a product of the technical exigencies of large scale industrial production? can the existing pattern of "occupational differentiation" be taken as a given in class analysis, as neo-weberian argument suggests? these questions, which are central to class analysis, have been (uncritically) answered in the affirmative by the majority of nonmarxist sociologists. celebrants of the technocratic thesis of "post-industrialism", such as bell, kerr, inkeles and etzioni (to name only a few), not only accept this technological determinism, they relish in its implications. although they remain critical of some of the more egregious conclusions drawn by 'post-industrialist' theorists, progressive weberian writers such as giddens and parkin remain captive to the technological determinism which underlies the 'post-industrialist' view. this is a legacy of weber that is not easily shaken off. 136 in contrast, recent marxist writers have tended to take a more critical view of the relationship between technology and social •tructure. herbert gintis (1976:37), for example, writes of the "dynamic interaction" between technology and social relations — a view quite removed from the economic and technological determinism commonly ascribed to marxist writers. in gintis* view, the division of labour in capitalist society is not technologically determined; rather, it is the product of an interlacing set of management priorities designed to increase worker productivity while structuring the workplace in a manner consistent with capitalist relations of production. braverman, in labor and monopoly capitalism (1974), has tackled the relationship of technology and the division of labour in more depth. braverman has argued that while the proliferation of technical operations within production is determined by the level of technological development, the fragmentation of these operations (i.e., their assignment to different workers) is socially determined* determined, more specifically, by capital's interest in maximizing the productive output of the labour-power it employs. by dissociating the labour process into a series of fractional operations, capital not only gains greater control over the fragmented labour process, it is, also, able to reduce the overall wage bill. "the labour capable of performing the process may be purchased more cheaply as dissociated elements than as a capacity integrated into a single worker" (p. 81). the fragmentation and rou t in iza tion of tasks which characterize the modern organization of work are thus explained in terns of capital's domination over the labour process, not the inexorable demands of technique. 137 braverman's work offers a vivid contrast to the descriptive and ahistorical account of class inequality presented by parkin and giddens. whereas these weberiaft writers provide an immediate description of stratification processes based on skill and education differences, braverman provides an historical analysis of changes in the division of labour which are thought to determine the extended reproduction of differentially skilled labour-power. braverman's analysis thus offers an explanation of the sourse of skill and education differences which enter neo-weberian analyses as "givens". in this connection, he argues that the dissociation of the labour process in the large scale industrial enterprise involves a gradual destruction of general skills, and the creation of a large category of unskilled manual labour alongside a category of technical and scientific specialists who monopolize knowledge of the labour process. this division of labour has all the appearances of a technically ordained specialization; yet it expresses, above all else, the separation of the immediate producers from control over production, and their consequent inability to develop an alternative division of labour. ( 'see also poulantzas, 1975, for whom the division between manual and mental labour represents a condition of ideological domination of the working class; also, gorz, 1972) these changes wrought by capital in the labour process are thought to be responsible for the transformation of the occupational structure over the past century. whereas in craft production each worker is a "repository of human technique for the labour process of that branch" (p. 109), the dissociation of the labour process creates new categories of workers who perform work which is largely mental (p. 109, 239). braverman depicts this transformation in terms 138 of a separation between the process of execution and conception in production: the novelty of this development during the past century lies not in -f.he separate existence of hand and brain, conception a riji execution, but the rigor with which they are divided from one another, and then increasingly subdivided, so that conception is concentrated insofar as possible, in ever more limited groups within management or closely associated with it (p. 125) for braverman, the separation of conception from execution, and the reduction of all labour to increasingly fragmented elemental tasks is a product of social relations of production, not of technica l exigency. experiments conducted on a limited scale, such as those at electronics and automotive plants, have already demonstrated that productivity is not tied to any particular form of work organization. indeed, as gordon (1976:22) >. has pointed out, there appears to be no theoretical reason why a number of alternative organizational forms might not yield equivalent productivities. why then does industrial organization remain tied to the assembly-line model? what accounts for the division of labour as we now know it, in the factory and in society? weberian theorists implicitly assume that, at least in broad outline, the division of labour is technologically determined. the general explanation offered by marxist writers is that the division of labour is determined by the social relations of production, specifically, capital's interest in increased productivity and in maintaining the authoritarian and hierarchial structure of th'e enterprise. (braverman, 1974; carchedi, 1975; gintis, 1976; gor don , 1976 ) . job fragmentation and the separation of manual and mental labour, execution from conception, are related to political and ideological relations of production. — not merely quantitative technical efficiencies. technical imperatives 139 remain important, but the way these imperatives are translated into a detailed division of labour is determined by those who control industrial production, aot the "industrial system" itself quite clearly, it is impossible to establish the precise relationship between technology and social relations at the theoretical level. this demands a concrete study of the division of labour and the specific influences which determine its development. technological determinist assumptions have long dominated theoretical thinking in this area; these assumptions are firmly imbedded in the dominant ideology where they serve to legitimize existing social relations. serious questioning of these assumptions promises to bring sociology closer to the potential ities for overcoming class inequality — potentialities that, to date, have been obscured by determinist ideologies. uk) references braverman, harry labor and monopoly capitalism , new york 1974 perhaps the most important book on the development of the division of division available . carchedi, g "on the economic identification of the new middle class", 1975 science and society , london a useful, if somewhat laboured, discussion of the middle class written from a marxist perspective. dahrendorf, ralf class and class conflict in industrial society , 1959 stanford university press a well argued refutation of the marxist theory of class; widely recognized as such gerth, h.h. and c.wright mills (ed) introduction to from max weber : 1967 essays in sociology , new york giddens, anthony the class structure of the advanced countries , 1973 london, this work is a sophisticated wcberian synthesis of the major themes in the stratification literature . gintis, herbert "the nature of labor exchange and the theory of 1976 capitalist production" review of radical political economi s ts , vol 8, no. 2, an interesting and very readable marxist view of the internal structure of the capitalist firm. gintis considers a number of important sociological questions, including sexual and racial stratification. gorz, andre "technical intelligence and the capital ist division of 1972 labour", teleos , vol 12 may usefully be read alongside braverman' s more detailed study. gordon, david m. "capitalist efficiency and socialist efficiency" 1976 monthly review , vol 28, no 3 a general theoretical consideration of the limitations of the capitalist firm to introduce alternative technologies. very readable, regretably short. johnson, terrence, "professions, class and the state", university of leicester (mimeo) a path-finding marxist analysis of the professions. hopefully soon to appear in print. navarro, vicente "the fetishism of industrialism: a critique of ivan 1976 illlch", monthly review , vol 28, no 5 only tangentially related to the present discussion. offers a critique of counterins ti tut lonal is ts . parkin, frank class inequality and political order , london 1972 a very readable wcberian survey of the stratification literature. the central line of argument has been considerably modified in the author's later work . 141 poulantzas, nicos classes in contemporary capitalism , london 1975 a theoretical re-working of the marxist view of class. quite readable, and brilliantly presented weber, max economy and society , new york 1968 commentary : imaginaries and realities, utopia and dystopia | 265 commentary imaginaries and realities, utopia and dystopia garry potter is associate professor of sociology at wilfred laurier university (waterloo, ontario, canada) . he is author of the bet: truth in science, literature and everyday knowledges, the philosophy of social science: new perspectives, and co-edited (with jose lopez) after postmodernism . more recently he wrote and published dystopia: what is to be done? and made a documentary film of the same title . the film can be viewed for free and downloaded for educational purposes from the website www .dystopiafilm .com . introduction: contradictions of hope and despair the dystopia thesis is an analysis of humanity’s most serious problems of the present and a prediction of them being exacerbated and added to in the near future. i have presented this thesis in some detail in my 2010 book dystopia: what is to be done? i also made a documentary film of the same name that is available for free viewing (http://www. dystopiafilm.com). what i intend to do here, is to give a summarised flavour of the overall argument presented in the book and film, but also add some reflections upon the utopian dreams of both right and left, and more importantly consider the left’s continued failure to construct a left vision that captures ordinary people’s imagination and enthusiasm. the dystopia thesis propounds an argument that the structural features of the world political economy are such as to make the problems we collectively face impossible to solve. the dystopia thesis is grounded in present day fact and highly probabilistic trajectories and outcomes as regards the future. the logic and empirical content of the dystopia thesis concludes a near certain hopelessness with respect to avoiding a future of unimaginable horror and suffering. causally inter-connected, mutually enhancing catastrophes, are around the corner . . . and there is nothing we can do to prevent them yet at the same time, the dystopia thesis was founded on the contradiction of pessimistic assessment and sincere hope. if one believed absolutely in the hopelessness of any effort to avert catastrophe what would be the point in articulating the argument? 266 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times utopia and dystopia are bound up together in complex ways. both have their causal effects of interpenetration of imaginaries and realities. for example, both liberal and socialist utopias form a part of contemporary dystopian reality, as ideological barriers to an accurate understanding of both the present and future possibilities. the apocalyptic media visions of life after the bomb . . . or virus or asteroid strike etc. etc., also contribute to a lack of understanding of what is now and what might come to pass in the near future. these imaginaries are part of our dystopian reality because they serve to deceive and mystify us with regard to real problems. i will begin by summarising the dystopia thesis, giving particular attention to its knowledge, power and ideology component: the theory of structural mystification. i will then reflect upon some of the ways both utopian and dystopian fictions feed into this mystification. finally, i shall embrace the dystopia thesis’s own contradictions (that is to say my own) and discuss how a vision of hope is the only hope we have, how the dystopia thesis ultimately calls for a new marxist imaginary, a realistically feasible, yet nonetheless inspiring, utopian vision to sustain us in our struggles. this last component of this piece is perhaps too big to be anything other than a preliminary reflection here. it is a task i have been wrestling with ever since i began my work upon the dystopia thesis. the question of what is to be done was not part of my original project because quite frankly i only had the vaguest of vague ideas about what should be done. i was also, on some levels, persuaded that there was nothing to be done. i had only an instinct that sounding the alarm, as it were, might contribute to mitigating the horrors to come. however, as the project progressed it became clear that i simply could not present the dystopian vision and argument without engaging with potential strategies for dealing with the problems with respect to many of the dystopia thesis’s individual components, many people have provided far gloomier assessments than i. i tended to be rather cautious with predictions of catastrophe and apocalypse. but the cumulative emotional effect of seeing put together as a causally inter-linked conclusion, all the worst environmental problems facing humankind, along with all the most extreme suffering of poverty and disease, appeared to be too much for most of the people i consulted with. they told me that some strategies for the amelioration of crises had to at least be entertained, along with the analysis of their cause. some balance of hope had to be given along with analysis of calamity commentary : imaginaries and realities, utopia and dystopia | 267 however, my reflections upon the question of what is to be done began with critique. the analysis was of the inadequacies of many of the popular propounded solutions to the problems that were most serious. for example, the technocratic solutions to the world’s food or transport problems may have some value but miss the main point: the problems are most significantly political-economic problems rather than technological. for another example, charity may mitigate a small amount of suffering in the immediate present but cannot even begin to address the ocean of pain deriving from the systematically produced extremes of world poverty finally, i realized that utopian thinking, the right kind of utopian thinking that is, is actually a necessary counter-point to the dystopia thesis. it is a great irony that left-wing analysis, more specifically marxist analysis, is everywhere being proven correct and yet is not attended to. capitalism is in crisis on many fronts. there are rumblings of resistance and revolution in many parts of the world. and yet in the first world, most particularly in the american “heart of the beast”, where some of the contradictions of wealth and poverty are most extreme, the left has never been weaker . my conclusion with respect to this, is that while intellectual analysis of the problems has never been as acute, there still lacks an inspiring vision of a better world that is realistic enough for masses of people to see beyond the inertia of their present day to day living. reflection upon this situation shall be the conclusion of the article. the dystopia thesis the first argument of the dystopia thesis is that the future of misery and crisis that is dystopia is already here. perhaps a billion people live lives of such dreadful daily experience as to reduce any concerns about the future to the most immediate. they are starving or close to starving. they are watching their children being sold into the slavery of bonded labour or prostitution. they are dying of malaria or plague or tuberculosis or aids or any number of diseases. they live in a mundane poverty-stricken everyday life. or worse, they are incarcerated and perhaps are being tortured this very second. the list can go on and on through the drama of war and refugees, to the boredom and unpleasantness of under-paid, soul-destroying employment or unemployment. the future is already here for a billion people, if the future is dystopia the dystopia thesis’s predictions of the future are mainly simple probabilistic extensions of present problems being exacerbated. we are just beginning to see the effects of global warming but we can well 268 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times imagine increased future problems of flooding and hurricanes. and global warming is merely the most dramatic of the wide variety of environmental problems facing us. many of these link up with issues of resource shortages and energy. so yes, the dystopia thesis is a very simple argument in many respects: things that are bad now and are going to get worse however, entirely new problems are coming as well. peak oil will add to existing inequality, suffering, terrorism and warfare. but even more importantly, at some point, it will make our existing socio-political economic system impossible to maintain. there will be a post-carbon economy. this is coming whatever we do. but the dystopia thesis predicts an excruciatingly painful transition to this post-carbon future the dystopia thesis is also a causal analysis. on the one hand, it takes note of the immense complexity of inter-linkages of problems and causality. it observes the positive feedback loops and their snowballing effects. on the other hand, however, it posits a broad context of common structural causality. the world capitalist system possesses structural features that ensures extreme inequality and thus poverty. poverty is not only an effect that is suffered but is in turn a cause of many, many other problems. in this regard, the dystopia thesis is essentially marxist. it thus sees inequality, unemployment and poverty as features of the world political economy that are not contingent but rather are fundamental to the system unemployment rates (in any country), for example, may rise or fall; that much is contingent upon a variety of factors; but whether there is to be unemployment or not at all, that is not a variable. some level of unemployment is functionally necessary to the system. this is among the reasons why the dystopia thesis rejects reformism as a potential solution to the avoidance of dystopia the world capitalist system is just that, a world system1. globalization is not something new; it is an on-going developing process that emerged simultaneously with the birth of capitalism. the development of the richer countries was dependent upon the lack of development in the poorer. development and underdevelopment evolved together. the wealth of the rich, whether it be people or nations, is dependent upon the lack thereof by the poor the particularities of recent global economic change and the neo-liberal economic ideologies and policies that have driven them have had many dire consequences of course. but neo-liberalism per 1  i am indebted for the world systems theory here to immanual wallerstein and andre gunder frank. commentary : imaginaries and realities, utopia and dystopia | 269 se is not the real problem. capitalism is the real problem. a return to keynesian economic policies may well save capitalism from some of its contemporary crises . . . but it will not save us from dystopia2. it will not save the world; inequality will be maintained; the suffering of that inequality will be maintained; environmental destruction will continue unabated. in addition to a structural logic of profit which necessitates inequality, the world capitalist system has a structurally determined time-frame for decision and action. it has a temporal logic, which ensures that potentially beneficial decisions and actions of collective pain avoidance and responsible environmental stewardship will come too late. the peak oil problem can be used to clearly illustrate this. as we all know, the problem of peak oil is not that we will run out of oil eventually. rather it is that after the capacity for world production peaks, demand will not slacken but continue its ever increasing pressure. prices will dramatically rise to a point whereby the present world system of trade and commerce, of energy and transport, of agriculture and consumption, simply will not be able to continue without drastic change. we will move into what people are beginning to call a post-carbon world. the dystopian point with respect to the peak oil problem is not that a post-carbon world is necessarily a future to be feared. no, the problem, the future to be feared, is the transition to it. we could imagine (and people have, which we will discuss in a moment) a post-carbon economy and world as actually a good thing in many ways. what world capitalism will ensure is that the sensible planning in advance that would enable a smooth painless major transition of economy and lifestyle will not occur. capitalism’s political-economic temporal logic forbids it. there is a further key factor in capitalism which keeps our most serious problems from being effectively engaged with. this is the problem of power and knowledge and ideology. structural mystification structural mystification is the negative side of the dialectical contradiction found in the institutional production of knowledge. structural mystification exists as a counterpart to the real knowledge production and dissemination practices of the media, the education system and all other institutions fundamentally concerned with the production and dissemination of knowledge 2  see the excellent critique of the return to keynesian economics by richard wolff (2011). 270 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times the relationship between power and knowledge has been theorized in innumerable ways. ideology has also been theorized from many conflicting, and frequently confusing, perspectives. the key points of the theory of structural mystification, however, are clear and relatively simple3. power sometimes corrupts the production and dissemination of knowledge. but it is not as though the production of knowledge could take place without the influence of power relations. no, institutional power relations also facilitate the production and dissemination of knowledge. this is why the relationship between power and knowledge is dialectical. knowledge production (and dissemination) most significantly takes place within institutions. the institutions all have within them a dialectical contradiction for example, the university generally is fundamentally concerned with the production and dissemination of knowledge. this is not a contingent feature but essential to the very nature of what a university is. that that is not all the institution is, does not change this fact. knowledge production is fundamental in a way that having a football team is not (however important that may be for some universities). but also fundamental to the very nature of a university, is the dialectical opposite to knowledge production and dissemination: the obfuscation of the production of knowledge and the restriction and sometimes outright prevention of the dissemination of knowledge. while all university faculty would be forced to acknowledge that this sometimes occurs, few are aware that it is not a contingent feature the university, amongst other things, is a complex structural hierarchy of power relations. further, it is connected to the broader hierarchies and complexities of the power relations of the world . . . of the world capitalist system. this is not any simple matter of conspiracy or propaganda or intentional distortion. rather the production and dissemination of knowledge takes place at the nexus of many different levels of conflict there is frequently a conflict between the institution and the government in terms of priorities of spending on research and pedagogy, and in terms of academic freedom of speech and critique and dissent. there is an ongoing conflict between the priorities of the board of governors and the university senate. there is a constant scrambling over scarce resources between faculties and departments. there is genuine intellectual debate and politically coerced loyalties and acts of bad faith. there is not only conflict between individuals but conflict within individuals. 3  for a more complete account see potter, 2010c. commentary : imaginaries and realities, utopia and dystopia | 271 there is a struggle to “do the right thing” and a struggle to know what that is. it is both a moral and an intellectual struggle . . . and one that takes place very often within a mystifying fog . . . a mystifying fog that they both suffer and frequently help to construct. it is not for nothing that the word “academic” also has a pejorative sense to it. and as pierre bourdieu (1988, p. 207) puts it, academics are often “mystified mystifiers” the first ideological victims of the operations of power and classification they perform. structural mystification is also structurally embedded within science itself. yes, even that tremendous tool for acquiring information and potential understanding of so many things is frequently corrupted through its practical and ideological contextualization within the wider political economy. and yet science on another level, is absolutely our only hope of coming to terms with the crises of dystopia. there is a plethora of examples to choose from to make these points about science here. but i will briefly mention the “hydrogen highway” and hydrogen automobile. the hydrogen car (in a variety of formats) is often propounded by politicians and auto makers as the future solution to the problems of global warming and peak oil. it doesn’t use oil and it doesn’t pollute (directly). there is not space in this article to go into the practical limitations of this technology in relation to the political economy of it. these have been thoroughly explored elsewhere (see for example demirbas, 2009, romm, 2005, and the unattributed article on the alternative energies website). no, the major importance of the hydrogen “solution” is mystificatory. its practical realization is always far enough in the future as to necessitate a continuance of the gasoline vehicle status quo. the utopian promise of the idea is sufficient though, to deflect political action toward any more immediately viable technological solutions knowledge production and dissemination, including scientific knowledge production and dissemination, is profoundly affected by politics . . . and politics is profoundly affected by knowledge . . . and the lack of it. the problems of dystopia, whether global poverty or global warming, require radical change. radical change requires significant mass-scale collective political will. political will requires knowledge. the knowledge gets produced, as does its mystifying ideological counter-arguments and “facts”. the knowledge gets distributed . . . on a restricted scale. the knowledge gets produced and receives a restricted dissemination but the ideological counter-points are trumpeted and/or subtly and insidiously whispered in the media, or taught in the schools or even at home 272 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times among the most potent elements of dystopia with respect to knowledge and ideology are the utopian visions that grab the collective imagination. the utopian imaginaries are part and parcel of our dystopian reality. the utopian dream of capitalist reform slavoj zizek quotes john caputo (caputo and vattimo, 2009, p. 124-125) to make a point about utopian thinking concerning the possibilities of reforming the capitalist system: i would be perfectly happy if the far left politicians in the united states were able to reform the system by providing universal health care, effectively redistributing wealth more equitably with a revised irs code, effectively restricting campaign financing, enfranchising all voters, treating migrant workers humanely, and effecting multilateral foreign policy that would integrate american power within the international community etc., i.e., intervene upon capitalism by means of serious and far-reaching reforms. . . if after doing all that badiou and zizek complained that some monster called capital still stalks us, i would be inclined to greet that monster with a yawn. zizek (2009, p. 79) does not dispute whether such reforms would make for a better world, or even if we might be better able to remain within the system if such far reaching reforms were possible. instead he argues that: the problem lies with the “utopian premise” that it is possible to achieve all that within the coordinates of global capitalism. what if the particular malfunctionings of capitalism enumerated by caputo are not merely accidental disturbances but are rather structurally necessary? just to be completely clear, i will answer zizek’s rhetorical question. the “malfunctionings” are not such at all; the ill treatment of migrant workers, for example, is certainly a moral shame, but it is not because of an accidental flaw in the system. no, it and the rest enumerated by caputo, are structurally necessary to the system. utopian visions and dystopian realities vision. this is what we would like to see in our political leaders. in america, and elsewhere as well of course, but especially in america, vision is in short supply. so we are given utopian fiction. but it is often presented not as a vision of the future but as a pious hope for the present, through the idealized glasses of memory. it was not president bush or clinton or reagan that gave us this poetized vision, a: commentary : imaginaries and realities, utopia and dystopia | 273 . . . reminder of the time when two powerful nations challenged each other and then boldly raced into outer space. what would be the next thing to challenge us, that makes us go farther and work harder? you know when smallpox was eradicated? it was considered the single greatest humanitarian achievement of the century. surely we can do it again. as we did in a time when our eyes looked towards the heavens and with outstretched fingers, we touched the face of god. yes, poetic indeed, but it was president bartlett of the west wing (episode 5, 1999), not obama, that articulated this vision of past and future. its resonance, of course, is with kennedy and the beginnings of the “space race”. but along with kennedy’s perceived martyrdom (to what exactly?, i often wonder) goes a collective amnesia of the real fear of nuclear holocaust and a total ignorance of what was really going on with the cuban missile crisis. forgotten also, is the bay of pigs; and most of all it is forgotten that it was with kennedy that the american involvement in vietnam began the eradication of smallpox was undoubtedly a truly wonderful achievement. bartlett says: “surely we can do it again”. and of course this should be true. but this utopian moral imperative, stands alongside the historical reality of the tragic failure to eradicate malaria. in 1958, the worldwide effort to eradicate malaria began in earnest. it was led by paul russell from harvard’s school of public health. the united states congress directly allocated $23 million a year towards the battle. it also provided 90 percent of the world health organization’s anti-malaria budget and a significant proportion of the budgets of the pan-american health organization and unicef (united nations children’s education foundation). this constituted a financial commitment in the order of billions in today’s dollars. it was a serious commitment to eradicate a serious collective human problem. but it also was an effort with a definite time limit to it. paul russell in his international development advisory board report emphasized the time line of malaria eradication: four years of ddt spraying and four years of monitoring that there are three consecutive years of no mosquito transmission in an area. he also emphasized the dangers of failing to complete the program of eradication: ddt resistance, renewed disease pandemics and a virtual economic impossibility of having another attempt in the future be successful. a four-year commitment was made, and four years of funding was what was given. four years were nearly enough. in 1955, sri lanka had a million cases of malaria. in 1963, it had only eighteen. 274 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times only another two or three years of concerted effort and financial commitment would have given the world the same success with malaria as it had had with smallpox. but the funding was cut off4. the result, of course, was not merely the failure to eradicate something that was eradicable. the result was to make the problem worse, much worse. the insects developed resistance to ddt and other pesticides. the malarial parasites developed resistances to quinine, chloroquine and other drugs. most importantly, in areas where the mosquitoes and disease would almost certainly make a comeback, many millions of people now lacked all resistance to the disease. by cutting off funding to the eradication efforts, congress and the other “money people” were condemning millions of people to death in the future. such is the relationship between the time frame for capitalist political economic planning and future calamity. such is the relation between eloquent vision and a sad reality. but if the harsh reality stands in contrast to utopian vision there is something rather pathetic about the vision as well. people often imagine utopia as something very like small town america in the fifties. the dark side of this hope was portrayed nicely in the film pleasantville (ross, 1998). but as good as this film was, it cannot stand in comparison to the real life utopian monument to this vision of the world. i’m speaking here of the disney-built small town celebration near disney world in florida. it looks like main street usa in disney land but it is a real town that people live and work in. as someone once put it “it just seems to be the perfect little town back in a nicer time. except it feels creepy”.5 what is to be done? the answers to the question of what is to be done which i gave in my book and film were all fairly obvious. they could be fundamentally articulated in a number of traditional leftist slogans: “the people (the left, the workers) united will never be defeated”, “union!”, “one solution, revolution” “occupy, resist, produce” and so on. i advocated boycotts and protests and taking it to the street. i criticized reformist compromise and charitable band-aids. in short, i advocated what the radical left has advocated for years. that these activities and slogans are obvious does not diminish their importance nor their power to effect change (witness tunisia 4  i am indebted to laurie garret’s excellent (1995, p. 48-52) account for all the factual information of this history. 5  name withheld by request. commentary : imaginaries and realities, utopia and dystopia | 275 or egypt for recent examples of this). but still, in the face of all the forces of structural mystification, something crucial seems lacking. the masses may have been teeming into the streets of tunis and cairo; the poor may have come down from the shanty towns of caracas to have thwarted the 2002 coup in venezuela, but. . .while the arrest report of toronto’s 2010 g20 protests was impressive in terms of numbers, the numbers of people who merely peacefully marched in protest was on a relative scale, pitifully small. most torontonians, most canadians, simply went about their ordinary business and watched the violence on tv as a spectacle which had nothing to do with them. my point here again is obvious; cairo and toronto are different worlds; the developed and the developing, the core and the periphery, are miles apart in present political potential, as well as in terms of their economies but the problem is that we are one world; so the “first world” needs a revolution too. but the political consciousness is not there. . .or rather it is not here . there are contradictions in this. the majority of the affluent middle classes in countries such as canada or the us cannot seem to grasp what is obvious to millions of peasants and workers in the developing world. is it that their affluence blinds them? some would have us think so. but there is more to it than that marxist analysis of capitalism is repeatedly, and everywhere, being proven correct. right wing ideology is not faring well. we have had, for example, such an intellectual big gun for laissez-faire capitalism as alan greenspan admitting he was fundamentally wrong. . . about everything. yet in north america and europe, the left has never been weaker. why? i don’t presume to reduce the answer to this question to a single cause. however, i do want to focus here upon one of the causes. the left has thus far failed to articulate a positive vision of the future that truly catches people’s imagination! there is, of course, a good historical and analytical set of reasons for this failure. early in its history socialist thought divided in terms of hard and soft. proponents of these softer versions of socialism seemed to spend a lot of time dreaming. for many marxists the term “utopian socialism” was a pejorative. . .and rightly so. to spell out in great detail a picture of the future without having paid any attention to the process of getting there, without a proper appreciation of the problems of the present, is utopian in this negative sense, simply because the thinking is unrealistic. 276 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times it may be the case that there also is a certain, necessarily utopian element, to the dream of overthrowing of capital. but can one dream and still be realistic? can we fly and yet be grounded? good marxist analysis does not predict too specifically about the future. it rightly concludes that there are simply too many variables for such to be sensibly done. so where does that leave us? one of the excellent stunts of the yes men (2009) has given me an idea in this regard. they printed and distributed a hoax version of the new york times. this satirical version of the times had such headlines as “iraq war ends”, “maximum wage law succeeds” “popular pressure ushers recent progressive tilt: study cites movements for massive shift in dc” and “nationalized oil to fund climate change efforts”. there was a small caption by their times banner that gave me the idea: “all the news we hope to print”. we cannot realistically articulate a detailed far-off in the future vision. but we can clearly see what is wrong now. this can be our realistically grounded imaginary: the many problems being immediately solved let us begin articulating things that could be done, things just beyond the political realities of the moment, but nonetheless easily imagined. i have had so many conversations with ideology derived ignorant people about socialism. “well, if all property is going to be shared, does that mean somebody else will be allowed to use my toothbrush?”. or “ . . . just how exactly is it going to be organized for people to do their little bit of literary criticism in the afternoon?”. the conversation needs to be changed. john steinbeck articulated the direction of such a change in his classic novel the grapes of wrath: “what’s a red anyway?” “a red is somebody who, if you’re getting paid 15 cents an hour thinks you should get 25” “oh . . . i guess i’m a red then”. it is testimony to the power of such simplicity that when hollywood made their film of this novel they transformed this conversation. in answer to the question of what a red was the answer was given; “it’s hard to say. . . i really don’t know”. so instead of trying to present some detailed blueprint of the far-off future, let us give a series of questions and strong simple answers to people about the present and the immediate future . . . of what could be done. how can we eliminate hunger in the world? we can take the entire canadian wheat crop and offer to transport it free to where food is most urgently needed. could we afford to do this? yes, it would take an evenly distributed tax increase of only about 2% to afford to have canada save the world from starvation all by itself! how can we provide basic education and health care to the whole world’s population? well, we could commentary : imaginaries and realities, utopia and dystopia | 277 take half of bill gates’ money, and half of warren buffet’s money, and this special tax upon the two of them could alone easily finance the effort. the serious problems of poverty could be realistically costed. these costs could then be presented along with the estimates of individual wealth. yes, personalizing it would make a great difference. people seem to get lost when one talks about the top one percent of one percent. four hundred people in the us have a combined wealth greater than the wealth of half of the population of the us (johnston, 2011). people’s heads swim when one talks about the trillions of dollars spent on defense. we need to present to people what could be done for the price of a fleet of battleships or a single stealth fighter. we need to present to people that such and such changes in the national and international laws relevant to generic drugs would save exactly how many lives of people dying of aids or tb. i am not arguing for a single campaign. no, it needs to be bigger than that. the left, the world’s left, needs to continually present a vision of all the things that could be so quickly and easily done to make a better world. “a better world now” could be the new slogan arising from an unflinching look at the horror of dystopia. references bichlbaum, andy and bonanno, mike (2009). the yes men fix the world, renegade pictures uk . bourdieu, pierre (1988). homo academicus, california: stanford university press. caputo, john and vattimo, gianni (2009). after the death of god, pp. 124-125, quoted in slavoj zizek first as tragedy, then as farce, london: verso: pp. 78-79. demirbhas, ayhan, (2009). biohydrogen: for future engine fuel demands, springer press. frank, andre gunder (1966). “the development of underdevelopment” monthly review, volume 18. _____. (1967). capitalism and underdevelopment in latin america: historical studies of chile and brazil, monthly review press. garrett, laurie (1995). the coming plague: newly emerging diseases in a world out of balance, new york: penguin. johnson, dave (2011). “9 pictures that expose this country’s obscene division of wealth” alternet .org . http://bearmarketnews. blogspot.com/2011/02/9-pictures-that-expose-this-countrys.html kunstler, james howard (2005). the long emergency: surviving the converging catastrophes of the twenty-first century, grove atlantic. 278 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times paine, chris (writer/director) (2006). who killed the electric car? sony pictures classics. potter, garry (2010a). dystopia: what is to be done?, waterloo: new revolution press. ____. (2010b). dystopia: what is to be done? the film version–www. dystopiafilm.com. ____. (2010c). “power and knowledge: a dialectical contradiction”, journal of critical realism, equinox publishing. romm, joseph, j. (2005). the hype about hydrogen: fact and fiction in the race to save the climate, island press. ross, gary (director) (1998). pleasantville, new line cinema. sorkin, aaron (writer/director) (1999). “season one episode five” the west wing, nbc. turteltaub, jon (2006) jericho, cbs paramount network television. unattributed (2011). “hydrogen fuel vehicles looking at the disadvantages of hydrogen fuel vehicles” http://www.alternativeenergyresources.net/hydrogenfuelvehicles.html wallerstein, immanual (1974). the modern world-system i: capitalist agriculture and the origins of the european world-economy in the sixteenth century, academic press inc. wolff, richard (2011). “the keynesian revival: a marxian critique”, alternate routes, 22, 103-14 zizek, slavoj (2009). first as tragedy, then as farce, london: verso. neoliberalization and the matrix of action | 183 neoliberalization and the matrix of action: in conversation with neil brenner, jamie peck, and nik theodore — peter brogan peter brogan1 (pb): there’s been tons of ink spilled in the last few years in efforts to try to understand different formations neoliberalism has taken and the meaning of the capitalist crisis that broke in 2008 and what that has morphed into. in that context you guys have continued to refine and rethink your theorization of neoliberalization, part of which has been a consistent argument for the need to hold onto the concept of neoliberalism/neoliberalization. can you give me an outline about why you’ve made this argument for the continued relevance of understanding the contemporary period through a conceptualization of neoliberalism or neoliberalization and what’s different or unique about your understanding of neoliberalism? jamie peck2 (jp): there’s no point in holding onto the concept of neoliberalism for its own sake. clearly it has to be doing some work. i think the work that it does is to force you to think through connections across different geographical sites and historical time periods. it’s that impetus that it gives you to think through connections that is important, connections between neoliberal projects in one place and another, their family resemblances and structural features. it also provides a spur to think about opposition to neoliberalism in a more-than-local way. neoliberalism becomes one of the 1 peter brogan is a ph.d. candidate in the department of geography at york university, toronto, canada. his research focuses on the geopolitical economy of contemporary capitalism, urbanization, education and teachers’ unions. in may 2012 neil brenner, nik theodore and jamie peck sat down with peter brogan in chicago to discuss their scholarship and the present political and economic conjuncture. the following interview is an edited transcript of this dialogue. in the past 10 years they have collaboratively and individually published widely on the changing dynamics of neoliberalism, urbanization and labour market change. 2 jamie peck is the canada research chair in urban and regional political economy, and professor of geography at the university of british colombia. 184 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism points of reference—even if it’s an extremely problematic, unloved, rascal concept—which we have to be prepared to reconstruct. it at least places all of these developments in a wider frame. recently, we can see how it has provided a frame through which the global financial crisis has been understood and, as it turns out, responded to. and we can see that the character of neoliberalism postcrisis is not quite the same as it was before. it has gone through another of its mutations. at the same time, it is still recognizably neoliberal, even as it is being actively reproduced at such moments. the work it does as an ideological formation is an important part of understanding the present crisis, and the extremely ideologically constrained responses to that crisis that we’ve witnessed. of course, it was not absolutely predictable and necessary that the ideological and political responses have been constrained. the neoliberal frame will not hold forever. but that’s the way things have worked out, at least so far. we need to try and understand the limitations of the responses to neoliberalism and why it’s been possible to resuscitate a form of market rule on the back of a crisis manifestly created by the excesses of monetization and deregulation; how a kind of houdini escape has been fashioned once again. but i don’t think it offers you any pat, easy answers to this question. and certainly it’s not an excuse for saying; ah, it’s just neoliberalism again, end of story! that isn’t an explanation. invoking neoliberalism is the beginning of an explanation, not the end. you’ve actually got to get in and amongst the processes of institutional transformation, which i think is one of the reasons we argue for working at different levels of analysis, rather than just having an entirely macro-level understanding of neoliberalism. this is why we insist on exploring how neoliberalization is reproduced through all these domains—the institutional, the ideational, the ideological, the social and so on—as a contradictory process. and so that’s why we’ve argued for a fairly refined and complex notion of how this process works. neil brenner3 (nb): i would just add a couple of things to jamie’s arguments. first, we agree with the tradition of neo-gramscian political economy that there is a world-historical, epochal struggle under capitalism over the form and extent of commodification. throughout the history of capitalism there has been an ongoing political and institutional struggle to determine how far commodification processes can be extended into the fabric of society. obviously both the classical liberalism 3 neil brenner is a professor of urban theory at the harvard graduate school of design. neoliberalization and the matrix of action | 185 of the late 19th century and neoliberalism of the post-1970s period represent internally distinct sets of approaches to this problem that involve creating specific types of regulatory infrastructure designed to intensify the extension of commodification across society and across space. and the kind of keynesian interlude that, broadly construed, obtained after world war two can be construed as an attempt, albeit unevenly developed, to insulate the fabric of society from processes of commodification. so in this sense, our own use of the term neoliberalization is a way of trying to demarcate the historical and geographical specificity of the post-1970s regulatory reorganization of capitalism—it is not simply an ideological movement or a political alliance, but a pathway and trajectory of regulatory reorganization. this reorganization has involved a renewed attempt, as jamie has said, to intensify market rule at every spatial scale. but having said that—and i now turn to the latter part of your question—we are equally interested in uneven regulatory development. what this means is that the process of extending and intensifying market rule in the post-1970s period has been deeply unevenly developed, both spatially and temporally: it does not simply unfold in state-by-state or city-by-city, but involves regulatory recalibrations that crystallize a kind of wave like process in which inherited institutional infrastructures, including those inherited from postwar keynesianism undergo processes of institutional creative destruction, generating new institutional landscapes in which markets are promoted and commodification is extended. this is not simply a unilinear succession, along the lines of a total dismantling of keynesianism followed by the rise of a new, neoliberalized regulatory formation. in effect, our usage of the term neoliberalization is a first-cut attempt to demarcate the broadly developed force field of strategies and struggle in and around market rule in the wake of the collapse of the keynesian compromise. our arguments about the uneven development of regulation and the regulation of uneven development are an attempt to understand the different ways in which this process of regulatory restructuring unfolds, without embracing a traditional phase model of capitalist regulation in which one fully formed phase disappears and another fully formed model emerges. for us, neoliberalism is not a model at all—it is an unevenly developed process of market-oriented regulatory reorganization. jp: because we have to remember that absolute market rule is impossible. so the process of neoliberalization not trending towards some complete or 186 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism fully articulated condition. that’s why we think of neoliberalization as a transformative process, not as a label for this or that economic system or phase of development; it shapes a paradigm of restructuring. it’s a process of continuing to intensify, displace, and reschedule contradictions which are endemic to the prevailing regime of market-oriented development, corporate rule, and social discipline. but while neoliberalization is strategically focused in this way, it’s also repeatedly failing. so, in a sense that’s why we’re interested both in perpetual restructuring, crisis-driven experimentation, and what are often improvised, zigzagging responses to failure—which is inevitable because there is no historical trend towards absolute market rule. yet that’s the unattainable destination, the conservative-neoliberal utopia which remains the inspiration of these projects, but must not be seen as a prediction of where they are leading. hence the necessity for critical work on actually existing transformations of neoliberal rule, neoliberal policy failures, new forms of experimentation, and so on. you can’t just read the road to serfdom and conclude, “ah-ha, this is the plan!” actually, it works out very differently—always unpredictably, and always reshaping the political terrain. nik theodore4 (nt): so then the analytical and the political are linked by a shared concern to understand the terrain across which neoliberal projects are being prosecuted, as well as the processes through which they occur and of course their material effects. i really do believe the analytical and the political are firmly bound together with a set of shared concerns to understand the contours and limitations of neoliberalization. pb: i want to bring in the urban dimensions of all this because i think this is where you guys have been pushing the theoretical and political envelope in your work on neoliberalization. in what ways have cities played central and strategic roles in not just the extension of neoliberalism in the post-2008 crisis period, but the entrenchment or resurgence as you put it? conversely, how should we understand cities as sites for the renewal of organized resistance to neoliberalism? nb: one simple way to start in explaining our position on this is through a distinction we made a long time ago between the neoliberalization of urbanization and the urbanization of neoliberalism. this is a kind of short4 nik theodore is an associate professor at the university of illinois at chicago (uic), and former director of the center for urban and economic development (cued) at uic. neoliberalization and the matrix of action | 187 hand, but it’s simply a way of saying two things. on the one hand, if you’re interested in looking at urban governance during the last thirty years, you can see a tendential reorganization of local institutional arrangements in ways that promote, intensify and extend market rule as opposed to earlier, managerial and distributionist orientations. as david harvey argued back in 1989, reorientation has been transformed since the 1970s from postwar concerns with social reproduction and redistribution, towards the priorities of economic development, place promotion and territorial competitiveness. of course, this realignment has been documented extensively in the literature on urban entrepreneurialism and local economic development; it’s a pretty well-established argument. to some degree jamie’s more recent work criticizing richard florida and the idea of the creative city is a further development of that discussion—economic development is now connected to broader questions of culture and place identity. but, on the other hand, if you flip that idea around, it is also possible to observe various ways in which projects of neoliberalization around the world are now increasingly contingent upon the reorganization of urban built environments themselves. so it’s not just that cities and urban governance systems get neoliberalized, but that the broader, global project of neoliberalization is increasingly anchored in specific places—it doesn’t just involve reorganizing wide rule-regimes governing, say, financial transactions, trade and capital investment, but hinges massively upon investments in built environments to facilitate a kind of neoliberal societal project. to some degree some of david harvey’s recent work interpreting the global financial crisis as an urban crisis provides a very useful entry point into that idea—it goes beyond his earlier concept of urban entrepreneurialism to suggest that neoliberalism is today itself being urbanized in important ways. jp: and i’m just remembering one of the conversations that we had 10 years ago when we we’re setting up the workshop that nik and neil put on here. it’s the anniversary of this event that we’ve been marking this weekend. there was an early preamble to the original meeting, i remember, that raised the question of whether we should understand the urban and the city as a privileged scale where these processes work out, where the politics are played out, or a vital scale? and as a result of this conversation, we decided that we didn’t want to say that it was privileged in a straightforward way, but rather that it is vital; you need a multiscalar reading of these processes to really make sense of them. so we don’t sequester key processes or certain 188 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism kinds of politics to one scale; we don’t say that neoliberalization is a process that operates primarily at this scale or it is a creature of this scale, because it clearly operates across scales. but perhaps one of the more neglected scales—until relatively recently—has been the urban. the neo-gramscian strand of political economy talks very powerfully about the global. and we have a whole literature about national transitions to different forms of neoliberalism, say in britain and chile, and the politics of thatcher and pinochet. what didn’t exist 10 years ago was thinking about how the urban scale was connected to these wider transformations, and how cities had become a vital scale both for the projects’ reproduction and its contestation. so the city becomes a kind of crossroads, where you find some of its most excessive forms of neoliberal politics and the strongest forms of resistance, but it’s not only that scale that matters. we wanted to place an understanding of urban political economy in this broader context. and we can all see now how the most recent financial crisis as partly incubated in the american housing market, but was constituted globally at the same time. we can also see how speculative dynamics, financialization, and capital switching have driven an epic city-building across china in the last 20 years, but as harvey has argued that’s a development of world-historical significance, not just an urban thing. it’s simultaneously a global phenomenon. so we would argue against the privileging of one scale or another. yet, we also argue that the urban needs to be taken seriously, alongside those other scales which in many respects are well documented in politicaleconomic work. the urban really needed to be integrated into these accounts, far more effectively than it was 10 years ago. there has been a lot of progress on this front in recent years. nb: just a couple other things on this. first, a really important point for us hinges on the concept of the secondary circuit of capital which was developed in the 1970s by lefebvre and harvey. according to this idea, in a time of crisis, capital floods into the built environment as a potentially safe refuge – so urban property markets may experience particularly intense investment pressures precisely under conditions of industrial decline. this insight certainly provides some purchase on contemporary neoliberalization patterns in cities—but insofar as such property markets are also, today, tightly connected to global financial markets and instabilities, they certainly no longer provide the kind of “safe haven” from crisis tendencies that they appeared to offer during previous rounds of economic crisis. this dimension of neoliberalization neoliberalization and the matrix of action | 189 has been very productively explored by manuel aalbers and others in their recent work on the financialization of urban land markets. second, equally important to our interest in cities is that cities are sites of important forms of ideological work: they are represented, in media and policy discourse, as sites of crisis and policy failure, and simultaneously, they are situated rhetorically and practically as the target zones for increasingly punitive, repressive and exclusionary “solutions” to those issues. in this ideological trope, which is repeated in various ways across the global urban landscape, the city thus becomes the arena for both problem and solution—regulatory failure and marketbased pathway out of the crisis. now that the failures of these marketbased “solutions” to earlier regulatory failures are also becoming blatantly apparent within urban built environments around the world, can new or revamped forms of neoliberalized regulation be layered on to already deeply crisis-stricken, tendentially marketized regulatory environments? or will this situation provide an opening for alternative mobilizations, urban and otherwise, that challenge the illogics of market authoritarianism and hypercommodification? pb: that’s the thing i want to push on, because in an earlier interview nik and i discussed new organizational forces like the right to the city (rttc) alliance and other non-traditional urban struggles and movements that have emerged to contest neoliberalism in the united states.5 i want to ask where you think some of these struggles have moved in the past few years. in particular could you talk about different efforts to scale up or to build interurban networks like the right to the city alliance and amongst domestic workers and so on? occupy is another kind of movement which is very place-based but also has this kind of urban, translocal dimension to it. what’s going on with these struggles? nt: one of the important aspects of the rttc alliance is that it establishes a framework for local action but one that connects those actions across different localities. and so a national framework was in place to respond to the very financialization crises that neil was just mentioning. so when the housing market tanked and the bubble burst and the wave of foreclosures began to hit low-income, predominantly african american and latino communities, you had a set of organizations that had 5 hugill, d. and p. brogan. (2011). the everyday violence of urban neoliberalism: an interview with nik theodore. mrzine. http://mrzine.monthlyreview.org/2011/theodore050411.html 190 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism aligned both to engage in struggle in their local communities but also to scale up that struggle to target what they viewed as some of the principle actors in that hardship, the banks. and so next week [early may 2012] you’ll see the rttc alliance ally with other networks like the national day laborers network and the national domestic workers alliance to descend on charlotte, north carolina the home of bank of america. this is similar to the alliance that formed about a year ago in boston where a number of social movement organizations went to the streets to target bank of america and other financial leaders to call attention to the foreclosure crises, which is disproportionately being wrought on lowincome african american and latino communities. and so it’s through those types of social movement formations that you’re able to do two things: deal with the local specificities of the crisis, but then scale up the struggle to go after financialized capital which operates not just locally but transnationally. jp: i believe that this is also a case where political responses to neoliberalism, even though they may begin at the local scale, and in many ways may need to, they do not stop at this scale. while resources and capacities can be built at the local level, experiments can gain traction at the local level, it’s crucial that the horizons of action and imagination exceed the local. the local is invariably where organizing starts, where mobilization begins. the logic, rationale, and the power structures of neoliberalizing regimes always exceed the local, however. so political responses—counter-neoliberal actions—have got to attack those targets, as well as taking on immediate issues at the local scale. the living wage movement is a good example, a movement which begins local and specific but which builds up and out as it develops. nt: and what these networks do is create spaces within which to develop a shared analysis. they are spaces to communicate that analysis to a wider public and they are spaces, crucially, to link up local resistance into something larger—something regional, national or international. so they are a strategic response to the globalizing, destablizing and displacing effects of neoliberalization. they are a way to try to project beyond the local and try to reveal at least some of the root causes of social suffering. usually when we think of “roots” we think of them as being local. but the root causes primarily are extralocal. this it requires resistance to move to a position of extralocal resistance, to something beyond the local. you can see this notion contained in the world social neoliberalization and the matrix of action | 191 forum, for example. the creation of those types of formations show that, even 20 years ago, activists worldwide were starting to think in this way. pb: i want to push on this question of resistance a bit further. it seems to me rather important to interrogate the fact that rather than coming out of one the worst crises periods in capitalism since 1929, arguably, with a more revitalized and fighting spirit movement of the left, both in north america and globally, to push for an alternative global rule regime or even more local alternatives to neoliberalism, what we have instead are working class and oppressed people on the defensive everywhere. in city after city the working class is being hit with massive austerity and from a progressive perspective we should have been able to take better advantage of this crisis, as people fighting for social justice. so, as your work has argued instead of taking advantage of the crisis to push forward socially just alternative we have this entrenchment of neoliberalism rather than a development of real alternatives. why? jp: one way of addressing this question is to first ask how neoliberalization works. it actually works as a kind of refraction and displacement machine. so a fiscal crisis which was germinated by the banks is refracted into a state crisis and projected onto marginalized populations. and so we get this period of austerity politics. it’s in this hall of mirrors that neoliberalization does its work, making sure that others pay for the cost of crisis. it also has a kind of shape-shifting character, exhibiting different forms, inhabiting different political shells. this means that it’s extremely elusive and intractable politically. it can leave many of its opponents flat footed as a result. and because we’ve gone through 30 years or so of neoliberalization, which has targeted organized labor and other sources of potential opposition, the foundations from which counter-responses might be constructed have been eroded. that gradual incapacitation has not been accidental, it’s been an explicit goal of the project. the current crisis has morphed into an attack on public-sector unions, now that something like half the remaining union members in the united states are in the public sector. in a sense neoliberalism is always going to take the fight to you, to the remaining sources of resistance. what the left i supposed needs to do is figure out a sort of jiu-jitsu move that would enable different kinds of responses to be imagined, to exploit the weight of the opponent. because clearly just relying on the old structures which have just been under relentless attack for decades is not going to be sufficient. it may be a place to 192 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism start but it’s never going to be enough on its own. so that’s why you need different kinds of coalitions, you need to think across scales in different ways and connect struggles in different locations. nt: in addition to that, many of the recent counter-neoliberalization moves that we have seen remain, in our terms, “disarticulated” in this time of crisis. they are disarticulated in the sense that explicit extralocal linkages—nationally, continentally and globally—are still, in most cases, only emergent. they may be gathering steam now, but at the onset of the crisis they were not capable of offering a plan that could avoid the false choices and politically rigged tradeoffs that have been presented by centrist and right-wing politicians. so the progressive response—in terms of offering alternatives to neoliberalism, to austerity politics, and to the goal of restoring corporate profits above all else—was not up to the task. i would add that from a political standpoint, the state of our public intellectuals is likewise not up to the task. there are not enough progressive public intellectuals who can clearly articulate an alternative vision and program, and seize upon the strategic openings that are created during times of crisis. but in defense of grassroots social movements let’s be clear that the social violence of the crash was visited most severely on marginalized communities, and while we may have wished or hoped for a more coherent and comprehensive response, the reality was they had to deal with the crisis first and foremost. in times of upheaval, sometimes you have to take care of the more immediate needs of your community, which makes it difficult to articulate the grand alternative. pb: you gotta put the fires out. nt: you must put the fire out; to stop the house from burning. and that was a major challenge. so our position would be to not judge social movements, and even public intellectuals, too harshly. we understand the constraints imposed during a time of crisis, but let’s remember for the future that you’ve got to strike when the moment presents itself. progressive alternatives need to be put forward precisely at the moment when upheaval is greatest, since it is in those moments that public attention is most fixated on social problems and the search for potential solutions. nb: i would add to that one specific point: it is very important to transpose the fight for redistribution into broader critiques of the capitalist character of production in the world today. obviously, the distribution of wealth, the surplus, matters a lot, and the occupy movement has neoliberalization and the matrix of action | 193 very effectively problematized this. but that shouldn’t distract us from a broader discussion about how economic life is organized—for instance, about the ramifications of private ownership and control over investment decisions that affect the entire world (socially and environmentally); about the endless reinvestment of socially produced surpluses in pursuit of privately appropriated profits; and about the financialization of huge dimensions of everyday life and public resources (including, in a neoliberal era, not only housing and food but, in many contexts, water and clean air). in other words, there’s a broader question here about social and political control over the surplus, at any spatial scale, and in my view this needs to be debated and to remain on the agenda for the left. such concerns do not displace the issue of redistribution; they are tightly connected and reinforce one another in powerful, productive ways. it may be useful, in other words, to re-appropriate and update some of the ideas about economic democracy that were mobilized by european communist and socialist movements during the interwar period and, later on, within the certain strands of eurocommunism and the new left in the wake of ‘68. pb: i want to push on this a little bit and get all you guys to chime in because i was going to ask this question before you made these comments, neil. should progressive forces be trying to build counter hegemonic strategies to neoliberalism or counter hegemonic strategies and alternatives to capitalism? and what’s the difference between the two? i think in some ways neil put it squarely when he said we need to raise critical questions about what the economy is for and how we make decisions about production and not just redistribution. because i feel like this has been a common critique of regulation theory, and it can be leveled at some of your work, which is that if we’re going to focus so much on neoliberalism/neoliberalization as a mode of regulation we don’t necessarily see or put the priority on the underlying system of capitalist production. jp: i wouldn’t see those as mutually exclusive choices. neoliberalism can be seen as the current historical form of capitalism, its contemporary expression if you like. this is the kind of institutional, ideological shape that capitalism has taken and this is also the landscape from which alternatives will have to be mobilized and articulated. so understanding this terrain is going to be important for how you can develop transformative responses to the present reality. but clearly you would never want to just stop at the institutional level; you can’t expect to achieve much simply by 194 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism switching neoliberal institutions for, say, retro-keynesian ones. these are both essentially liberal responses to regulating capitalism, and need to be understood as that. the agendas of anti-capitalist struggles and visions are clearly much more expansive than that. this said, i think one of the worst misrepresentations of regulation theory, one that is still out there, is that it’s a kind of nostalgic yearning for a return to fordism and keynesianism, those thirty golden years after the second world war, and if you could just get that system going again everything would be fine! clearly this is not possible in the world we live in now, neither would it address the racial and gender inequities, ecological problems, and such like, of the fordist-keynesian regime. we need something different than that. it’s kind of interesting though that the vacuum created in the financial crisis and the wall street crash, just about all that was sucked into that vacuum was a kind of retro-keynesianism, which seemed to last for a couple months before we found ourselves back with some rebooted version of the neoliberal program. and the public intellectuals that were calling for this were the likes of stiglitz and krugman. there was no other story in the mainstream debate around the crisis. there was clearly a vacuum there. but that was all there was to fill the void in that moment. at least in terms of the mainstream conversation about what the meaning of the crisis was and what appropriate responses were. so clearly you’ve got to transcend that. the inadequacy of that is self-evident. pb: i think that’s a really important clarification. i don’t know if you guys want to come in on that. n.b.: i agree with what jamie just said. many of the major disagreements in those classic debates between bob jessop and the british journal capital and class related less to matters of substance – the interpretation of what capitalism is and how to change it – but rather to questions of method – the question of which level of abstraction was most relevant to particular types of analytical and political concerns. one side emphasized the cmp (the capitalist mode of production) on a very high level of abstraction, whereas jessop built upon such arguments and – much like we do in our present work – emphasized a meso-level of abstraction connected to the regulation of that mode of production and its associated contradictions. jessop’s then-claim, and our claim now, is not that capitalism can be reduced simply to the institutions of regulation –this is not an institutional ontology but a stratified ontology in which different layers of reality are neoliberalization and the matrix of action | 195 expressed in different ways at each level of abstraction. one payoff of this stratified conceptualization of reality is that it permits analysis of the concrete institutional and regulatory forms in which broader, systemic features of capitalism are expressed. this in turn permits consideration of path-dependencies—whether of keynesianism, of first-wave neoliberalizations or of secondwave neoliberalizations – through which institutions may demonstrate resilience even in the face of systemic pressures associated with accumulation processes and crisis tendencies. if you’re only operating with abstract models, looking for “pure” expressions of capital’s dynamics, it is difficult to explain the variegated institutional and regulatory geographies that we have tried to explore in our work—they are often quite dysfunctional from the point of view of capital, but they are also not easy to dismantle or creatively destroy for a whole range of contingent political reasons. but, more generally, i think that many arguments from structuralist variants of marxism are quite compatible with—and can very usefully inform—the institution-centric and regulationist analyses that we and others have been developing. jp: it’s important to note that one of the ways in which neoliberalism works is through the downscaling and outsourcing social risk. that also explains why the contradictions tend to pile up in cities. because essentially everybody’s passed the buck down until it can’t be passed any further. in many ways this is quite specific to neoliberalization, or at least there is a particular nexus between neoliberalization and urbanization. i think if you paid some attention to that it will help give you a sense of the structure of the present terrain and what it means to try and respond to the challenges of neoliberalization, financialization, and the extension of corporate power in this historical moment. so the broader questions about capitalist transformation are always there, but you have to get at them by understanding some of these ideological and institutional realms that create the kind of matrix for action in the present time. pb: what do you think are the biggest challenges – politically, strategically and theoretically – for mobilizing a counter hegemonic alternative to this resurgent neoliberal capitalist world that we’re confronted with and embedded in? nb: we might want to break this question down and start with some of the problems with social-scientific analyses of neoliberalization. a lot of social-scientific research on neoliberalization, for example, might not have an immediate payoff for the practical question of what is to be done, 196 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism but we would argue that it still is really important, especially insofar as it contributes to theoretical conceptualizations of contemporary institutional and spatial transformations. from my point of view, a big part of what theory does is to illuminate the essential properties of structures and processes that exist in the world, and thus to clarify the parameters of necessity and possibility given current institutional arrangements. while such arguments may not have immediate consequences or payoffs for questions of political strategy, i believe that they can inform activism and the work of social movements by helping them understand what they are dealing with—systemically, institutionally, politically and so forth. this kind of argument is sometimes met with frustration by colleagues and friends who want theory to offer direct insights into the strategic questions that are of such urgent concern to the left. this is not an unreasonable demand, but i also would strongly defend the moment of abstraction, as distinct from immediate questions of practice, as also being hugely relevant to the work of the left. simply put, sometimes you have to wrestle with a theoretical problem in a focused way, as a basis for illuminating the dynamics and tendencies that obtain in the world, before you can even begin to figure out how that analysis might morph, on a more concrete level, into arguments about strategies and tactics. this position resonates a bit with the one theodore adorno took, very defensively, at the end of his life in relation to the activists of ‘68 who viewed his work as too theoretically distant. while i would not necessarily stand by that particularly austere conception of theory i do think that adorno’s position continues to have relevance for us today. part of the freedom which theory offers is precisely connected to the fact it’s not an immediate handmaiden to instrumental, practical concerns—that is how i understand adorno’s position in relation to the ‘68ers. in other words, it is precisely the autonomy of theory from the question of what is to be done that gives it a certain power to engender utopian and radical thinking about possibilities that might barely be visible in the everyday world. that’s of course not the only function of theory, and here i would not go as far as adorno did in distancing himself almost totally from the realm of practice. but i do believe in that moment of theory as a pulse of freedom, as a projection beyond the present into a realm of the possible. jp: something that is both a near-term and a strategic challenge is how to escape the localist trap. if, in a strategic sense, one of the consequences of the way in which neoliberalization has worked is that it has backed the neoliberalization and the matrix of action | 197 left into local enclaves. in a practical sense, left responses to neoliberalism may therefore have to begin with local action, but the local enclave cannot be the limit of the left’s imagination or ambition. but to get out of the trap, and to start to think much more translocally about political strategies, is a real challenge. there’s a huge challenge in figuring out how you move from those local responses to something that is more organized across scales and internationally. i’d say so far the kinds of networking that we have seen is suggestive, but it remains relatively frail. and certainly it is not enough to carry the project of countering neoliberalism to its next stage. globalizing resistance networks have been around for a couple of decades but in a sense we’re still trying to figure out how to take that next step, to move from these loosely networked global responses to something more generalized, which actually starts to tackle the rules of the game and turn around the rules of the game, which are still being organized according to the logic of finance capital and the logic of competition. the dominant rules of the neoliberal game also undermine local forms of resistance and counter-politics, not coincidentally, both in strongholds and in other places. working extra-locally is the next step. nt: we come from a tradition that values both action and thoughtful reflection. i think one of the positive developments, when you look at formations like the right to the city alliance, is that they act, they use that activity as a way to generate an analysis, they then reflect on that analysis and action, and they act again. so it’s not an approach that says there’s a distinct time for thinking and then you act. instead, you see an approach to social struggle that may turn to abstract analysis and theoretical reasoning, but then merges these with an on-the-ground analysis of contemporary conditions, and sees this as an ongoing process of action and reflection. this praxis can propel social struggle forward in ways that you may not have predicted at the outset of an action. it is both trying to forge a path towards social justice while reacting to the everyday realities and the obstacles that are put in that path. and you can only do that by simultaneously acting and reflecting, making the road as you walk, so to speak. i think we’re deeply sympathetic with that approach, and to the extent that our work has informed progressive social movements, even in a small way, we feel gratified and, i dare say, honored. 220 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism the electro-motive lockout and nonoccupation: what did we lose? what can learn? — herman rosenfeld1 in the months since the february 2012 settlement at the caterpillarowned electro-motive plant in london, ontario, the already bleak context for unionized workers in canada has deteriorated. austerity budgets at all levels of government and political attacks have continued to target public sector unions. the wall government in saskatchewan issued a consultation paper, which, if implemented, could eliminate the rand formula and attack union rights to engage in politics (cep, 2012), while ontario opposition tory leader tim hudak went even further calling for the kinds of anti-union policies initiated in wisconsin, ohio and indiana (ontario pc caucus, 2012). the ruling ontario liberals, with a minority government, have tabled a bill to freeze wages for teachers and plan to extend it to all provincial public sector workers. prime minister harper’s government has virtually eliminated the right to strike in areas under federal jurisdiction, forcing postal workers, airport and rail workers back to work in the name of preventing disruption to the economy. the notorious omnibus budget law targeted employment insurance (recipients must agree to seek jobs that pay dramatically below their normal pay rates); temporary foreign workers and even refugees. this has to be placed in the context of the dramatic pressure of restructuring, concessions bargaining and weak job demands in the private sector. while this has been an ongoing characteristic of the neoliberal period, a new phase began with the aftermath of the 2008 crisis, with the state-guided restructuring in auto, steel and other sectors (albo 1 herman rosenfeld is a former educator in the canadian auto workers’ education department, and has taught labour studies at mcmaster university and political science at york university. the electro-motive lockout and non-occupation | 221 et al, 2010). this process is still working itself through, as detroit-three auto bargaining recently ended with the union agreeing to extend a twotier wage for new hires with a “grow-in” period of 10 years, starting at 60 percent of the regular wage, with a “hybrid” pension, combining defined benefit and defined contributions plans (rosenfeld, 2012b). the high canadian dollar exchange rate – itself tied to the dominance of oil, gas and other natural resource export-dependency – certainly contributes to the problem (caw, 2012). there have been notable efforts at resistance by the labour movement and the social movement left. but these have been extremely weak, isolated and have, for the most part, ended in defeat. the larger labour centrals, such as the canadian labour congress and provincial federations have also been unable to mount impressive or even consistent resistance (although the experience in the latter is admittedly more mixed). this is the context that has driven a number of recent conflicts in this country, most notable the caterpillar-owned electro-motive lockout and closure. this experience is both particular to the changes in the larger transportation sector in north america, but also characteristic of the pressures facing the manufacturing industries, and therefore its unions and workers. electro-motive: what happened? by now, many people have a certain familiarity with the events at electro-motive in london. caterpillar, as part of its progress rail subsidiary, owns electro-motive.2 it was bought from two vulture funds that had previously purchased it from general motors in 2005 (wells, 2012). the notorious anti-union employer paid $820 million for emd, which also includes an electronic manufacturing facility in lagrange, 2 caterpillar is the world’s largest manufacturer of construction and mining equipment. general electric is its chief rival in locomotive production. caterpillar is noted for breaking the uaw plant in peoria, illinois, in 1995 and the closure of the brampton, ontario plant and caw occupation in 1993. in 2008, prime minister stephen harper visited the electro-motive plant to show off a $5 million federal tax break for buyers of the locomotive-maker’s products, and provided a further tax break on capital investment. in 2009, they set about a major expansion plan seeking to cut costs, laying off upward of 11,000 workers or 9 percent of its workforce. even though it lost sales and revenue through the 2008-2010 recession, caterpillars shares rose 64 percent on the down jones in 2010, reaching total sales of $43 billion in 2010, and profits rising 95 percent in the first 9 months of 2011. outgoing ceo james owens received $22.5 million for 6 months of work and a defined benefit pension plan worth $18.7 million. in the past year, caterpillar has opened new locomotive plants in brazil, mexico and muncie, indiana, in order to take advantage of their low-paid and exploited workforces. 222 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism illinois (griffin, 2004; moody, 1998).3 emd was the only manufacturer of locomotive engines in canada and the sale brought control over key technologies to cat. four months after the emd sale, cat announced plans to convert a factory in muncie, indiana into a union-free locomotive assembly plant. in december 2011, the company issued a final offer to its london workers that would cut hourly wages from $35 to $16.50 per hour, while slashing pensions and benefits, even though caterpillar enjoyed record profits and a 20 percent boost to production over the previous year (macdowell, 2012). the bargaining unit and local leadership refused and the company locked out its workers on new year’s day. the union local, with the support of the national caw, began a campaign to challenge and isolate the employer, and demand that they bargain seriously and withdraw the demands. the ofl called a “day of action” for 2012 january 21, drawing attention to the failure of the harper government to protect canadian jobs and interests when domestic companies are acquired by foreign multi-nationals. the demonstration drew upwards of 5,000 people, but was little more than a rally.4 the union did not occupy the plant. on february 3, after a month of campaigning, emd publicly announced the impending closure, and after a tense period, the union bargained a decent severance and closure package that the membership ratified on february 23rd” (grant and keenan, 2012).5 the closure of this facility in the face of the bullying by caterpillar is important – and will be addressed further in this article. but more important is the nature of the resistance – and the limitations of the strategic approaches used. the electro-motive/caterpillar experience is an example of a gross attack by a ruthless employer on a group of union members. the ultimate goal was not to get a wage cut, but to set the stage for a workplace closure and in the process, humiliate and defeat the union, thereby contributing another setback to the larger union movement. the union, caw local 27 refused to accept these outrageous demands and waged a locally-based campaign of resistance, on terms that traditionally would have meant something powerful, but in the cur3 a six-year struggle in the 1990’s defeated the uaw, one of a number of key defeats that the union suffered at the hands of this ruthless employer. 4 participants simply listened to speeches – difficult to hear with a faulty pa system. some went to the emd site and talked with the workers on their protest line, but there was a great deal of frustration and disappointment from many of the protesters. the author was also there. 5 later, at the caw-detroit-3 contract talks in september 2012, the caw was able to bargain job openings for 160 former gm workers from em at the auto assembly, at oshawa and cami. those working in oshawa would be able to add to their pension time, and retire at a full rate, while cami has an independent pension plan (grant and keenan, 2012). the electro-motive lockout and non-occupation | 223 rent era, turned out to mean very little.6 the kind of resistance chosen was unsatisfactory and, although the worst did not happen – the ultimate outcome was a decent severance package – it signalled both a serious defeat and a major opportunity lost. there is little to celebrate out of this episode. it should be sobering, disheartening and a learning moment, about what not to do and what must be done to win in this era. in a union culture that is unable to deal with defeats and retreats and learn from them, where every challenge must end up appearing as a ‘victory’ of sorts, it is difficult to learn the proper lessons and use that learning to make change. the union resistance was positive in a number of ways, but ultimately proved to be too limited. it resulted in a defeat that hurt the caw, the rest of the labour movement and the canadian working class. it helped contribute to the ongoing destruction of canadian manufacturing capacities, and therefore our sovereign capacity to build a different kind of economy. it helped the capitalist class and its political allies move forward in their efforts to deepen the neoliberal defeat of the working class. we need to look at what was done right and wrong. finally, this is not something that is limited to the caw. it is chronic throughout the canadian labour movement and is reflected in the recent defeat of the cupe municipal workers in toronto7 and the steelworkers locals at vale inco and us steel in hamilton (all of which had very different leadership structures and even ideological orientations).8 larger issues as it was unfolding, it was clearly on the radar of labour and people around north america and the world, who correctly, saw this as a kind of private-sector wisconsin, with all of the issues that this entails (yates, 2010). the interest in cat was, in a sense, a kind of culmination of the frustration that so many working class people have had to live with in this era of the re-constitution of neoliberalism. it touched a nerve with 6 local 27 is an amalgamated local – meaning it includes a number of bargaining units, including auto parts, manufacturing, public sector workers and members for other sectors. it has a long history of activism in the community, politics, in the caw and in the larger union movement. the current local president is also the president of the caw council (russell, 2011). 7 with the notable exception of the public library workers unit of cupe that waged a strike – after building public support – and came out rather successfully. (cupe, 2012, march 30). steelworkers at rio tinto in quebec also staved-off defeat (jamasmie, 2012) 8 even the caw, in its merger documents and at its major convention of august 2012, acknowledged the nature of these defeats and some of the underlying reasons for them (caw-cep 2012; rosenfeld, 2012). 224 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism many people. even mainstream pundits critiqued the larger phenomenon of blackmail against working people (and saw in it, the reality in most workplaces these days). it also linked up with the occupy narrative – of the unfairness of income and wealth inequality, in the face of the crisis unleashed by the financial elite. this sense of outrage diffused across north america, and, as was clear to all who would listen, working class people across cultures and labour market segments embraced the theme of the 1% versus the 99% as their own. it was a living example of the de-industrialization process and the loss of key manufacturing capacities; of large mega-corporations, moving capital investment at will just to pressure working class people to reduce living standards to accommodate private profit accumulation. it symbolized the threat to canadian sovereignty and the survival of our communities that capitalism has become. it was clearly part of a new and dangerously aggressive round of attacks on the working class in both the private and public sectors. it reinforced some key defeats in the private sector. there were times where the unions simply gave up and accepted the logic of competitiveness. these included 2 tier wages in auto in the us, acceptance of concessions in the canadian auto plants in recent bargaining rounds, situations where defeats were imposed by the state (e.g. auto concessions in 2008); and, even where the unions did mount a battle for resistance such as at vale inco, st. mary’s cement and us steel, where there were key defeats, anyway (rosenfeld, 2009; 2012). the losses in these situations were aimed at particular targets, such as wages, definedbenefit pensions and benefits. the attacks that electro-motive/cat imposed on workers, took this to another level the main thrust in the most recent period has been in the public sector, where these attacks have dovetailed with efforts to eliminate unionism completely (wisconsin, indiana, ohio, etc). in ontario, bc, and now through ottawa, attacks on unions threaten their very survival. the terrain of the current attacks are different in many ways than the previous rounds. they take advantage of capital mobility made possible by free trade. they seem to be centred in employers that have been favoured by government, either through negotiated aid deals or other forms of support (and are usually related to larger, continent-wide restructuring strategies). the demands of the employer result in either the destruction or dramatic weakening of the union and a radical shift in the rights of the workers. they mark a new level of defeat for the labour movement and affect the willingthe electro-motive lockout and non-occupation | 225 ness and capacity of workers to organize collective resistance. they undermine the rights of all working people – from those of us in the better paid jobs, to those of us out of work, on social assistance and in precarious jobs. what was wrong with the response to the em lockout and closure? there are many issues to raise with the response of the caw. both the national and the local leadership had very limited horizons and goals. they saw themselves as addressing the immediate needs of the workers in the em unit: refusing to accept the threatened wage cuts, but planning for a plant closing that seemed inevitable. the plan was to build a base of community and labour support in the london area and the larger labour movement, get material support for the workers during the lockout period and then work to bargain severance and pension rights. many of the political themes raised were the right ones: corporate greed, the need to maintain manufacturing capacity, how the attacks on the workers contrasted with the wealth of the corporate elite and the 1%, the role of harper and efforts to have the rest of the canadian auto workers and the ontario federation of labour support them. their tactics and strategy reflected those goals. their local campaign built widespread support across the london community. they engaged the provincial government behind the scenes to pressure cat for pension and severance. they blockaded the movement of goods in and out of the workplace and began a campaign to place information pickets outside cat outlets in southern ontario. but both their goals and their strategy were extremely limited and problematic. there was no move to occupy the workplace or extend and deepen the campaign to pressure caterpillar, or raise political demands to pressure the canadian government to stop an impending closure. they argued that “we didn’t want to turn people in the community off”, or threaten the possibility of bargaining a decent close-out agreement.9 the situation required a dramatic tactical move to politicize the struggle. a plant occupation, rather than “turning people off” could have galvanized already-existing concerns of working people across the province and continent. it could have created an opening to call for state intervention – in the form of nationalizing emd – as part of a larger project of building canadian capacity 9 while some might argue that there were differences inside the union, between the local, national and bargaining unit, the public face of the union at all levels clearly looked to downplay any radical actions, such as an occupation. any differences might be better explained with hindsight, but further research would be necessary. 226 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism to manufacture heavy transportation equipment, through the public sector. certainly, caterpillar is known as a ruthless employer, impervious to the claims of workers, unions or communities. no one seriously argued that actions could change their minds. but the struggle needed to be directed at the state – federal and provincial – to intervene to protect jobs and the manufacturing infrastructure that was clearly threatened. instead, the union’s perspective was local and short-term. there was absolutely no interest in making this a larger, political battle. there was blindness to the opening and opportunity that this universally condemned action by capital represented. it was almost as if the union was basking in the sun of public pity. the idea of pressuring harper for state intervention was seen as a pipe dream, beyond the pale of what and who the union is. an occupation could have concentrated interest and anger in london and created a platform to place nationalization on the public agenda, but this was the farthest thing from their sense of the possible. the tactic of occupation was portrayed as possibly threatening short-term interests of the workers at emd. (aside from the narrowness and strategic incompetence this represented, it made the positive links the union built with the occupy movement, rather hypocritical and embarrassing – ignoring the tactical and strategic audacity and originality of occupy).10 how might a different kind of campaign proceeded? the union could have expanded the campaign in london to include challenging government offices, banks, larger industrial employers, all of whom suddenly became “allies” in the union’s perspective. it could have built a campaign across southern ontario – that might have included new and exciting educational materials and challenges to employers. there could have been a boycott of cat products around the tar sands and construction projects. there might have been a new educational effort with the members so that they are no longer afraid of “turning off the rest of the community”. education turned the tide during the ontario days of action in the 1990’s, which relied on the organizational and educational capacities of many of the same local activists in london today to win over workers who had voted for tory mike harris, to a protest movement against him. 10 it is one thing to speak out against inequality and give material support to protesters occupying public spaces to challenge injustice, but it is quite another to take similar control over the private property of capital, to demand that it become the property of the community. the electro-motive lockout and non-occupation | 227 where is the will and capacity to develop and build those mobilizational and educational resources today?11 the caw has had experience with bold campaigns that challenge employers in the past. the 1997 contract bargained at gm successfully dealt with the issue of outsourcing. it was preceded by a strike and campaign waged by the union. in that campaign, the union was able to win over public opinion by appealing to common experiences in dealing with job insecurity. there were many workplace occupations in the early 1980’s and late 1990’s. true, they were mostly organized over demands for decent closeout agreements, but there is no reason that the tactic couldn’t also be used to be the central sparkplug for a larger political campaign to keep a workplace open. the caw has the institutional memory to carry out such a campaign. certainly, the times and context are different today – but the caw had no intention of considering an occupation for more than severance and a decent close-out. indeed, the current defeat of the labour movement and the working class as a whole – the strength and hegemony of employers and the entire, united, capitalist class – demands that bold actions and radical approaches be taken to help inspire an awakening in the labour movement. certainly, there is no tactic or individual struggle that can magically transform the dismal situation the labour movement faces overnight. but a more ambitious plan could have possibly helped get the labour movement off dead centre, where it remains. waiting until the political and economic balance of forces ‘improves’ is equally problematic – as if the stubborn power of capital can ever be challenged without an upsurge of some kind from below.12 this moment constituted “the” critical opening to deal with the unspoken issues and concerns of working people across the country. the moment was there to raise and answer questions like: 11 in the period preceding the hugely successful london day of action, local and national union activists and leaders came to london to engage with members, many of the latter whom were reluctant to oppose harris, let along strike employers or picket. this was a major game-changing educational effort, which made the early one-day general strikes possible (la botz, 2011). after a few minutes in conversation with workers at emd in front of the locked-out plant, it wasn’t difficult to see that the union could have quite easily convinced the membership to take part in an occupation. 12 can one seriously claim that tightening labour markets could, by itself, miraculously produce a surge in militancy, or a growth in radicalism? it seems that every new concessionary agreement coming from unions like the caw is couched in a discourse lamenting the unfavourable larger balance of forces, and claiming the “we will live to fight another day”. the latter, like tomorrow, never seems to come. 228 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism • why should we accept the constant threats to jobs in the name of cost-reduction and competitiveness? • why should ceo’s receive massive incomes, when we have to accept wage and benefit cuts? • why must we and our children “get used” to the lack of good, secure, well-paying jobs, and instead, accept the normalization of part-time, low paid, precarious work? if workplaces like this are going to close without any alternative plan – what have we to look forward to? but there are other political issues that could have and should have been raised as part of a fight to keep this workplace working: • why can’t we defend our right to produce locomotives in this country? isn’t it central to our needs for political sovereignty? isn’t it important for efforts to create a transportation system that is environmentally sustainable? what about mass transit investment for urban areas? • while harper continues to negotiate new free trade agreements, doesn’t the emd closure create an opening for us to raise the call to challenge and ultimately abrogate existing agreements that allow the free movement of investment and capital unregulated by democratic institutions? • wasn’t harper vulnerable on all of these points? his government intervened with the postal workers and repeatedly did so at air canada to supposedly protect the national interest. he was also seen to be in cahoots with cat in his praise of subsidies to the employer. while the p.m. claimed that the emd closure was between a union and a private employer and a matter of provincial jurisdiction, the hypocrisy of all of this made the federal government a legitimate target. • it poses the question of the role and limitations of the investment canada act. the demands of the union movement (often echoing the limitations of social democracy) have been largely limited to soft nationalistic issues of foreign takeovers; getting tradeoffs for financial help to help foster investment and local, provincial or national procurement policies. those are all important and positive. but, as in previous struggles, these are limited demands and will not address the larger issue of capitalist restructuring. the electro-motive lockout and non-occupation | 229 • shouldn’t ontario premier dalton mcguinty’s government be held to the fire, as well? ongoing corporatist illusions seemed to colour union’s comments about mcguinty’s 2012 january 31 limited public condemnation of cat. one can understand the union’s concerns about pressuring the province about severance issues, but it is quite another issue to be satisfied with mealy-mouthed statements from bourgeois politicians. corporatist relations with the liberals should be publicly repudiated. • demands to have the state finance and run a secondary manufacturing capacity (and in this case, heavy machinery, locomotives and engines and mining equipment) practically beg to be raised in this instance. • won’t the outcome of key private sector struggles such as this also affect the outcome of public sector struggles, such as the fight against cuts and privatization in toronto, b.c. and elsewhere? • then, there are issues of the rights of unionization and the right of collective bargaining, both being undermined by this sort of activity; this experience must be understood in the context of previous struggles, such as vale inco, us steel (hamilton) and st. mary’s cement. in each, there was important support from surrounding communities and other locals and unions, but there were no efforts to organize collective forms of direct action, such as rotating work stoppages in other workplaces or occupations. the struggles remained centred in their individual communities, with support from across the country in the form of picket lines and solidarity messages, but no co-ordinated efforts to pressure employers and/or governments. aside from the local unions involved, the campaigns were not transformed into large-scale movements, with educational components, geared towards reaching the entire working class. they were not tied to larger effects that working class and unionized workers have been experiencing – or to political strategies to shape the future of each of these sectors (steel, mining, cement, etc.) conclusion there are two general areas that come to mind when summarizing the lessons of the emd-cat experience: one, relating to the strategic challenges it raises for the union movement and second, larger economic and political issues raised by the loss of the electro-motive facility itself. the broader labour movement – even in its strongest and most militant 230 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism spaces – is still reeling from previous political defeats, the economic offensive of employers, the heritage of defensiveness and at times corporatist or concessionary tactical retreats, dependence on employers and the low-level of collective experience of political as well as industrial struggles that the neoliberal era has brought. in a seemingly neverending series of responses to vicious attacks, they repeat the same limited strategies. at best, they include local-based campaigns to get support for jobs, investment and livelihoods, looking for sympathy (“feel sorry for me”) and forms of solidarity, but never learning from mistakes and weaknesses of this strategy. they call for defending collective bargaining rights and protecting against foreign corporate predators, but the larger political demands are very limited and don’t challenge any of the rules of neoliberalism. there are no efforts to combine struggles with political demands that put capital on the defensive and plug into the real concerns of millions of canadians and americans. in order to address these weaknesses, the union movement must move in new directions and embrace the following strategies: • audacious industrial actions which challenge the power of the employer, and reinforce that challenge in the eye of other workers; • reliance on some of the more creative collective traditions of the respective unions; • seizing the moment to create political campaigns that tap into the almost universal revulsion with the attacks on living standards and jobs that come along with competitiveness requirements of neoliberalism; • putting forward demands for manufacturing investment and jobs, with a new and robust role for the state – including nationalization of manufacturing, finance and creation of new capacities, tied to industrial strategies linked to working peoples’ needs (transportation, health care, environmental transformation). we need demands that argue for a logic other than competitiveness and open up space for challenging our dependence on competitive export regimes and private sector accumulation in a crowded field – or worse, resource extraction. audacious demands need to be raised in the context of audacious actions, such as workplace occupations and strikes. • engaging members and working people in general on these themes. the electro-motive lockout and non-occupation | 231 • developing a different relationship between unions and community-based organizations and needs. for example, what kinds of links could have been built with working class communities over this struggle – communities literally dying for decent-paying and secure jobs? • reflective and self-critical “renewal” projects – which, i believe requires a socialist politics outside and inside unions. the consequences of not doing this have been unfolding right before our eyes. about two weeks after the ratification of the agreement at electro-motive, there was an announcement circulated in the local newspapers about a new collective agreement with the caw at lear seating, in kitchener. that contract was said to contain wage reductions of about 30 percent over the four years of the agreement and the workers are supposed to get a $40,000 transition payment to cushion the permanent wage cut. new hires would start at about half what the workers had been paid, allowing the company to bid on future work with a lower labour-cost base. (qmi agency, 2012) one wonders if this embarrassing agreement was in the works when the electro-motive struggle was going on. if it was, it certainly raises a number of questions about the way the lockout was handled. even if not, it provides a sorry, but all too predictable lesson about the consequences of not stepping up to the challenges raised by electro-motive. aside from the move into retirement for some of the 160 former gm workers laid off from emd, bargained by the caw in september 2012 (grant and keenan, 2012), others haven’t been as fortunate. a journalistic account in the globe and mail from october 5 2012, shows a story of financial and emotional strain: marriage breakups; lowpaid, part-time work for most; severance running out; food bank usage and so forth (grant 2012). but there is more. in the middle of august 2012 (as this essay underwent revision) caterpillar and the international association of machinists local union in joliet, illinois, signed a six year collective agreement that settled a four month strike of 780 workers making hydraulic parts. the contract freezes the wages for all workers hired before may 2005, provides a 3 percent one-time wage increase for workers hired after that date and doubles the cost of health care premiums, eliminates pensions and reduces seniority rights. this settlement took place in the context of hugely successful sales and profits for the company (second quarter profits of $1.75 billion, up 67 percent from the previous year) (cancino, 2012; keenan and mcfarland, 2012). 232 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism numerous commentators around the u.s. noted that this caterpillar settlement reflected a fundamental change in the balance of forces between labour and capital. the subtitle of the chicago tribune article cited above says it quite distinctly, “manufacturer breaks link between profits, workers’ pay; settlement raises wage issues for industry in general, labor experts say.” in other words, corporate behaviour towards workers that used to be considered “egregious” or beyond the pale, has now become the norm. it doesn’t take too much imagination to think about how this might have turned out differently, had the electro-motive struggle been expanded, deepened and fought to its potential conclusion. also in august of 2012, the merger talks between the canadian auto workers and the communications, energy and paperworkers of canada culminated in a proposal for new union. the documents accompanying the project – some of which have been cited in this essay – are rife with references to shortcomings in the collective resistance mounted against attacks by government and employers. with the timetable set for the formation of a new union, whose mandate will include efforts to addressing these weaknesses, one hopes that the lessons of the caterpillar experience will be critically evaluated – especially in the light of the other defeats that the labour movement has suffered in the past period (caw-cep, 2012; rosenfeld, 2012). finally, the lack of any serious discussion about strategies to create environmentally sustainable manufacturing capacities (aside from mild nationalistic commentaries from progressive academics and the bourgeois press13) was critical. militant resistance is absolutely essential, but it has to be tied to new sectoral strategies and approaches that challenge the neoliberal straightjacket that is dramatically weakening working class life and institutions. put another way, fighting back makes a difference, but it must be paired with independent working class strategies for rebuilding and re-imagining industrial and sectoral capacities. it should be clear that unions themselves are incapable of posing alternative industrial strategies that reject corporatism and dependence on progressive-sounding schemes for competitive private sector projects. this requires a larger socialist and anti-capitalist movement – left of social democracy – that could research, debate and place a range of alternatives into the large political arena. but even within the broader 13 actually, some of the commentaries posed key questions and raised issues that the labour movement seemed unable to put forward. (yates, 2012; macdowel, 2012; olive, 2012; walkom, 2012ab). the electro-motive lockout and non-occupation | 233 left, this is not yet happening (although some of jim stanford’s ideas for development of manufacturing industries tied to resource extraction is a legitimate contribution (stanford, 2012). changing this will require thinking through alternative plans for manufacturing and service job creation and political demands associated with them at local union and community levels, as well as through the creation of theoretical, organizational and political projects on larger national, provincial and municipal levels. references albo g., s. gindin and l. panitch. (2010), in and out of crisis: the global financial meltdown and left alternatives. oakland: pm press. canadian auto workers (caw), re-thinking canada’s auto industry: a policy vision to escape the race to the bottom. canadian autoworkers union. https://d3n8a8pro7vhmx.cloudfront.net/caw/pages/29/ attachments/original/13351 89435/554autopolicydocumentweb. pdf?1335189435. canadian union of public employees. (2012, march 30). toronto library workers ratify collective agreement. http://cupe.ca/bargaining/torontolibrary-workers-ratify. cancino, a. (2012, august 18). caterpillar, union settle; joliet contract sets new tone. chicago tribune. http://articles.chicagotribune.com/201208-18/business/ct-biz0818-cat-vote-20120818_1_labor-issues-contractaerospace-workers-union caw president’s report. (2012, august 20). constitutional and collective bargaining convention. http://www.caw.ca/en/11396.htm caw-cep discussion paper. (n.d.). canadian auto workers union, moment of truth for canadian unions. http://www.caw.ca/assets/images/caw_ _cep_discussion_document-final.pdf; caw-cep. (2012, august). towards a new union: caw-cep proposal committee final report. http://www.newunionproject.ca/wpcontent/ uploads/2012/08/final.report.pdf. communications, energy and paperworkers union of canada (cep). (2012, july 24). submission to saskatchewan’s labour “consultation”, international standards and the bid to turn the clock back on workers’ rights. http://www.cep.ca/sites/cep.ca/files/docs/en/120724-saskatchewan labourconsult.pdf grant, t. (2012, october 5). for laid-off caterpillar employees, the fall continues. globe and mail. http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on business/economy/manufacturing/for-laid-off-caterpillar-employeesthe-fallcontinues/article4593258/ 234 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism grant, t. and keenan, g. (2012, february 23). electro-motive workers ratify closeout deal. globe and mail. http://www.theglobeandmail.com/ report-onbusiness/economy/manufacturing/electro-motive-workersratify-closeoutdeal/article548573/ griffin, m. (2004, june 4-6). caterpillar’s assault on the uaw. counterpunch. http://www.counterpunch.org/2004/06/04/caterpillars-assault-on-the-uaw/ http://www.mining.com/rio-tinto-strikes-dealwith-canadian-locked-out-workers/ jamasmie, c. (2012, june 6). rio tinto strikes deal with locked out workers in canada. mining.com. keenan, g. and t. grant. (2012, october 11). in ingersoll and oshawa, caterpillar’s forgotten find new life. globe and mail. https://secure. globeadvisor.com/servlet/articlenews/story/gam/20121011/rbca wjobs1010atl keenan, g., and mcfarland, j. (2012, august 20). new battleground of wage freezes takes centre stage with caw talks. globe and mail. http:// www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/new-battleground-ofwagefreezes-takes-centre-stage-with-caw-talks/article4490806/ la botz, dan. (2011, march 9). ontario’s ‘days of action’ – a citywide political strike offers a potential example for madison.” labor notes. http:// labornotes.org/2005/01/ontario-days-action-citywide-political-strike moody, k. (1998, june). despite defeat, cat workers “vote solidarity.” against the current, 74. http://www.solidarity-us.org/site/node/851 macdowell, l. (2012, jan-feb) what’s wrong with caterpillar?. our times. http://ourtimes.ca/between_times/article_188.php olive, d. (2012, january 3). why caterpillar has the upper hand in the london plant lockout. toronto star. http://www.thestar.com/business/ article/1110094—olivewhy-caterpillar-has-the-upper-hand-in-londonplant-lockout ontario pc caucus white paper. (2012, june). paths to prosperity: flexible labour markets. http://www.ontariopc.com/paths-to-prosperity/ flexible-labour-markets/ qmi agency (2012, march 6). revolutionary new contract could drive auto industry. st. thomas journal. http://www.stthomastimesjournal. com/2012/03/06/revolutionary-new-contractcould-drive-auto-industry rosenfeld, herman (2009). the north american auto industry in crisis. monthly review, 61(2, 18-36 ——— (2012). caw-cep merger: new union in a difficult world. the bullet, 701. http://www.socialistproject.ca/bullet/701.php. ——— (2012b, october 1). canadian auto workers ratify 10 year twotier. labor notes. http://labornotes.org/2012/10/canadian-auto-workersratify-10-year-two-tier the electro-motive lockout and non-occupation | 235 russell, j. (2011), our union: uaw/caw local 27 from 1950 to 1990. edmonton, alberta: athabasca university press. stanford, jim. (2012, march 19). buy canadian’ and upstream supply chain as sector development strategy. rabble.ca. http://rabble.ca/ columnists/2012/03/buycanadian-and-upstream-supply-chain-sectordevelopment-strategy. walkom, t. (2012a, february 3). caterpillar attack part of coordinated attack to cripple unions. toronto star. http://www.thestar.com/news/ canada/politics/article/1125920—walkom-caterpillarclosing-part-of-acoordinated-attack-on-unions ——— (2012b, february 8). the real villain of caterpillar shutdown? mindless free trade”, toronto star. http://www.thestar.com/news/ canada/politics/article/1128113— walkom-the-real-villain-ofcaterpillar-shutdown-mindless-free-trade wells, j. (2012, february 4). caterpillar cunning yields london shutdown. toronto star. yates, charlotte, a. b. (2012b, january 30). high stakes in caterpillar lockout. toronto star. http://www.thestar.com/opinion/ editorialopinion/article/1123881—highstakes-in-caterpillar-lockout yates, m. (2010). editor’s introduction: something is in the air. in m. yates (ed.), wisconsin uprising, (pp.19-25). new york: monthly review press. austerity and aboriginal communities | 207 austerity and aboriginal communities: an interview with david newhouse — carlo fanelli carlo fanelli1 (cf): the public service alliance of canada (psac) has suggested that the 2012 canadian federal budget “is true to conservative governments course of assimilating the aboriginal population by making life in aboriginal communities unbearable.”2 psac points to the fact that the budget has done little if nothing to address housing issues faced by indigenous peoples and is subsequently continuing a trend of inequality thereby subtly forcing indigenous communities to assimilate in attempts to escape impoverished conditions. to what extent would you agree with such a proposition? if so, in what ways is the current budget a continuation of past attempts to assimilate indigenous communities in canada? david newhouse3 (dn): the 2012 budget provides limited funding for services such as education and community infrastructure, primarily improvements to reserve water systems. there are no additional funds to address the chronic housing problems nor to assist those who wish to pursue post secondary education. as we all know, one of the keys to effective labour market participation is a high level of education. without adequate support for primary and secondary education, the graduation 1 carlo fanelli is a ph.d. candidate at the department of sociology & anthropology, carleton university, with interests in critical political economy, labour studies, canadian public policy, social movements, urban sociology and education. in addition to serving as editor of alternate routes: a journal of critical social research, his work has appeared in socialist studies, journal of critical education policy studies, new proposals: journal of marxism and interdisciplinary inquiry, as well as the bullet, mrzine and labor notes. 2 public service alliance of canada. (2012). impact of the 2012 budget on aboriginal peoples. http://www.psac-afpc.com/news/2012/issues/20120417-e.shtml 3 david newhouse is chair of the indigenous studies department, and associate professor of business administration at trent university. his works include improving the aboriginal quality of life: changing the public policy paradigm, from woundedness to resilience: urban aboriginal health, hidden in plain sight: aboriginal contributions to canada, not strangers in these parts: urban aboriginal peoples and well-being in the urban aboriginal community. 208 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism rate will not improve and without increased support for those who make it to post secondary education, fewer will be able to continue. the lack of adequate funding makes it difficult to break from the cycle of poverty that exists in many aboriginal communities. despite land claim agreements and other types of agreement, most researchers and policy analysts agree that the current level of funding is considerably below what is needed to close the gap in social and economic conditions between aboriginal peoples and canadians. the cuts to the aboriginal health organizations removes an important set of actors from the policy advice circle. at a time when all of the indicators tell us that increased attention to aboriginal health services are important, it doesn’t make sense to remove the source of advice that can assist in the effective and efficient spending of funding on aboriginal health. the removal of an independent aboriginal voice, effective to a modern canadian democracy, means that aboriginal people lose the ability to affect government policy and participate effectively in the design and delivery of their own programs in this extremely important area. as to the issue of assimilation, i think that this process is more complex. certainly governments can require certain types of organizational behaviours and structures from their funding partners but that doesn’t mean that aboriginal people are assimilated if they adhere to them. there is an incredible movement within aboriginal communities to use ideas, practices, theories, etc from our own intellectual heritage as the basis for everyday life, including organizational and community lives. what is important is that the thinking of organizational actors is aboriginal and that thought is translated into appropriate action. two of the foundational ideas of indigenous thought are transformation and adaptability. the truth test for indigenous knowledge is whether or not it works in real life; does it help one to survive? this allows for change and adaptation while remaining aboriginal. we see this in the remarkable resurgence of traditional ideas being brought back into everyday life. assimilation occurs when one stops thinking in aboriginal terms. i’ll tell you a story from one of my first year classes a decade ago. we were reading a paper on the introduction of iron pots into mi’kmaq culture in the 16th and 17th centuries. some of the non-indigenous students argued that the mi’kmaq should not have used the pots since it changed their way of life and was not ‘traditional.’ a mi’kmaq student in the class spoke up, after a lengthy debate: but we liked the pots. they austerity and aboriginal communities | 209 made life easier for us. using the pots didn’t make us any less mi’kmaq. they strengthened us by enabling us to do more things easier. my views on assimilation and that of the students were challenged and changed in this instant. the history of aboriginal people is filled with similar adaptations and yet we remain aboriginal (of all types). yes, life has changed and we have adapted, just like other cultures around the world. the real problem around assimilation is the homogenization that is occurring as a result of the dominance of north american modernity and the market, which are proving to be remarkably powerful forces. cf: recent focus on attawapiskat has caused much of the canadian public to become aware of the impoverished conditions apparent on a number of reserves and has highlighted the significant disparities in wealth and income between indigenous and non-indigenous communities. to some extent, this renewed interest in attawapiskat and elsewhere has compelled the canadian government to develop new strategies for tackling poverty amongst indigenous peoples both on and off the reserve. to what extent are these challenges rooted in the failure of earlier policies and have there been any major shifts in policy orientation? dn: the conditions that created attawapiskat-like situations are myriad and are rooted in canada’s colonial history, the indian act and government paternalism, the establishment of indian reserves outside the economic space of canada, the continued racism towards aboriginal peoples, and a lack of adequate funding for local government services including education and job training. in addition, the funding regulations for indian bands did not provide for much local discretion in shifting funds to meet local needs as they emerged and changed over the course of a funding cycle. while first nations councils now have some increases in flexibility and a higher modicum of local control, in reality, demands for higher level of accountability from governments (both federal and provincial) effectively remove this control and the cycle of colonial administration continues, albeit in a different guise. in the economic area, the focus is now on success and helping those who are most likely to be successful. the new aboriginal economic development framework is based on neo-liberal principles, providing assistance to those who need it least and leaving those who need it the most behind. we seem to be moving towards a policy that emphasizes the market as a primary vehicle for the way in which individuals participate in 210 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism society. the emphasis on individual participation is at odds with the collectivist nature of much of aboriginal society. it will be a challenge for aboriginal communities to develop institutions that can effectively mediate between these two approaches. without them, and lacking the high levels of education needed to effectively participate in the market, i have great fears that the economic and social divide will continue to widen. the playing field isn’t level yet. cf: although the 2012 budget has been presented as being focused on providing more educational opportunities for aboriginal children, the canadian coalition for the rights of children4 (ccrc) has argued that the budget fails to recognize the importance of early education and is ignoring the needs of canada’s youngest generation. although the government has assigned $275 million over three years for both literacy and for the building of new schools, do you think that they are failing to address the earlier educational needs of indigenous children? moreover, the funds have only been provided for elementary school education rather than high school or post-secondary education, so in addition to neglecting early educational needs it seems as if the government is also failing to encourage later educational opportunities. what might the consequences of this be both in the short and long term? dn: what we fail to recognize is that education is a system of institutions that include more than schools and local education programs. for the system to function well, all aspects of it need to well designed and adequately funded. funding for classroom teaching is important but also needs to be supplemented by other activities these days: local school boards/committees that bring local control and parents into governance activities of schools, breakfast and lunch programs for students who often come from low income families, academic assistance such as tutors, mentors and guidance counselors, important cultural elements such as elders, traditional teachers and language teachers which help to provide a sense of pride in one’s own heritage and culture. one also needs capital funding to ensure that schools are up to date and well maintained. learning in outdated schools or poorly maintained ones doesn’t do much to improve success. it is also important to have parents involved in meaningful ways in their children’s education. the consequences of not adequately funding edu4 canadian coalition for the rights of children. (2012). right in principle, right in practice. http://rightsofchildren.ca/wp-content/uploads/ccrc-report-to-un-on-crc.pdf austerity and aboriginal communities | 211 cation means lower graduation rates, lower labour force participation rates, lower incomes and an inability to contribute to canada at ones potential. as the aboriginal population grows, additional resources for social assistance are required, at funding levels higher than the cost of the initial educational investment. cf: the ccrc has also raised concern that the budget has allocated no new funds or resources to address youth rehabilitation. to the contrary, among prime minister stephen harper’s first tasks since gaining a majority government in 2011 has been to introduce bill c-10 which among other things eliminates conditional sentences for minor and property offenders and instead mandates mandatory minimum sentences. a plethora of research has shown that such an approach is not only counter-productive but actually intensifies the very problems they allegedly seek to solve.5 as a consequence, this has resulted in the canadian civil liberties association and canadian bar association, among other groups, opposing the implementation of such legislation.6 given that aboriginal youth make up only 5 percent of the overall canadian youth population but are disproportionately represented in canadian prisons at 28 percent of the population, what kind of impact will this lack of rehabilitative funds have on indigenous communities? does this threaten to further victimize the vulnerable? dn: the budget changes and bill c-10 make it likely that the level of incarceration of aboriginal youth will continue at its same level and even more likely that it will grow. the mandatory minimum sentences mean that more aboriginal youth (and others) will serve time; the loss of rehabilitative funds increases the possibility of re-offending upon release. one could analyze the effects through two lenses: the first is a loss of community productive capacity as a disproportionate number of aboriginal youth are removed; the second is through the lens of community safety as the cycle continues as youth return to communities after custody. the loss of funding for rehabilitative services also means a shift in philosophy away from restoration and rehabilitation towards deterrence and punishment. given the gains made over the last two decades in trying to bring aboriginal ideas into the justice system and the move towards restorative justice practices, it appears that the system would 5 for an introductory overview see barken, s.e. and g.j. bryjak. (2011). fundamentals of criminal justice: a sociological view, 2nd edition. toronto: jones and bartlett learning. 6 the ccla has called bill c-10 “unwise, unjust, unconstitutional.” see http://ccla.org/ omnibus-crime-bill-c-10/ 212 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism become less amicable to aboriginal peoples rather than more. cf: one of the most contentious issues emerging from the 2012 federal budget has been to grant the canada revenue agency and other federal departments the power to withdraw the tax-free status as well as government grants from charities that are involved in so-called political activities. environmental groups, in particular, have been singled-out by federal minister of the environment, peter kent, for having been accused of money laundering, illegal activities and ubiquitous with radicals and terrorists. given the intimate relationship between many indigenous communities and canadian charities, as well as efforts intent on, for instance, limiting the reckless development of the alberta tar sands, destructive resources extraction on first nations lands or broader issues related to climate change, how might such changes have potentially damaging affects for first nations communities and issues related to social justice? dn: as a society i think we have moved in a direction that criminalizes dissent. dissent itself is defined quite broadly as any criticism or opposition to the government positions. this is dangerous territory and goes against the foundations of an liberal democratic society. it creates a climate of fear where groups of citizens are unwilling to speak their mind and advance their views as part of the public policy process. since aboriginal peoples have been subject to public debate restrictions in the past and have successfully found ways to advance their views, i would anticipate that aboriginal leaders and organizations will continue to advance their views, even at the risk of having their funding cut or affairs investigated. threats of interrogation and the like have not been effective in the past at silencing aboriginal voices. there has been much effort at building alliances with non-aboriginal groups over the last few decades on social justice issues. i would forecast that the attempts at labeling criticism dissent would not be effective and might have the opposite effect of creating more alliance and more pointed criticism and action. the groups who might be most affected are those who have charitable status and who are engaged in advocacy work that is considered critical of government policy. cf: in from wounded to resilient, you argue that the indigenous community needs to become aware of the ongoing colonial discourse that constructs indigenous people as ‘wounded’, causes them to remain reliant and restricts their ability to become aware of their own agency. if i understand you correctly, you argue that a collective consciousness needs to be developed in austerity and aboriginal communities | 213 order for indigenous communities to see themselves as resilient. given the economic crisis and harper’s cuts to many social services that aboriginal and non-aboriginal communities often depend on in terms of health, welfare and so on, do you think that this process has been restricted? in your view has the economic crisis constrained this process of ‘healing’? how might these cuts have continued this notion of ‘woundedness’ or prevented indigenous communities from moving past this stereotype? dn: good question. will the reduction or loss of government funding stop the healing process? it may slow certain aspects of it down but i don’t think that it will be stopped as its essential core doesn’t depend upon government funding. the developing resilience i think will be able to find new ways to address some of the problems. my major concern is for those who are the most vulnerable and the most wounded who need specialized supports and attention. we seem to have forgotten about them and it is clear that the institutional support will not be available. aboriginal people have always lived in a polarized environment with sharp differences in economic and social conditions. reducing this distance is a national challenge which the state has been reluctant to take up, except on its own terms. aboriginal peoples have articulated over and over again what they believe needs to be done to reduce the economic and social distance as well as bring them into confederation. the best articulation of an aboriginal vision of canada is the final report of the royal commission on aboriginal peoples. it forms the foundation of contemporary aboriginal political action on many fronts. it’s aim is to reduce the polarization. the question in my own mind is whether or not canadians can deal with a ‘healed’ indian. so much of our public policy effort is based upon the notion of woundedness. this is not to say that there is not genuine poverty and social dislocation that needs addressing. can we support aboriginal led efforts as i believe that healing comes also from doing things for oneself. i was struck by the results of the environics urban aboriginal peoples study that indicated that 100 percent of those interviewed had experienced discrimination and racism in their lives and had to a large extent decided that there was nothing they could do about it and so were getting on with living with it.7 it was an astounding finding for the year 2011 but it is illustrative of the complex environment that we live in. a recent ipso-reid poll also showed that most canadians 7 environics. (2010). urban aboriginal peoples study. http://www.uaps.com 214 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism believe that aboriginal peoples get too much from government.8 a part of the issue as i see it changing the attitudes of non-aboriginal canadians so that they can find a way to live comfortably with us. cf: in an era of unprecedented austerity and continuing economic insecurity, what are some of the major challenges facing first nations communities that have yet to garner the serious media, academic and popular attention that is warranted? in what ways are health care, housing and other social services at risk of deteriorating? and why is the continuing study of first nations peoples central to improving the lives of both indigenous and non-indigenous communities? dn: what always strikes me is the fragility of some of the gains over the last two decades. it is clear that government funding for services and institutional development is important and critical to continued improvement in health, education and economic participation. without stable predictable funding for a set of societal institutions in these three areas it will be difficult to improve. the loss of national aboriginal health organization and the first nations statistical institute will be felt as they represent important sources of knowledge for policy makers in all foray. what many focus upon is only the delivery of services; what is missing is an understanding of the nature of the institutions that are necessary for direct support organizations to function. the issue of racism and its effects has been consistently ignored by researchers and governments as have urban issues (which are now slowly beginning to gain some attention). policy makers have consistently ignored urban aboriginal peoples until recently. research helps us to better understand the issues and to devise, hopefully, better policy and programming interventions. aboriginal leaders complain that their communities have been researched to death and that their interest in more in action than more research. and to some extent this is true. much of the research on aboriginal peoples has been performed by outsiders and directed towards improving the knowledge of outsiders. what is needed is more research that is undertaken on issues identified by aboriginal communities as important to them, undertaken by researchers working with them rather than for someone external and which helps local communities understand their situations better. the likelihood of improved local effort is much improved. 8 smith, teresa. (2012, june 30). canadians think government is too generous with aboriginals: poll. global news. http://www.globalnews.ca/canadians+think+government+is+too+generous+w ith+aboriginals+poll/6442671478/story.html public broadcasting in canada: subordinate service david skinner simon fraser university introduction it is a popular conception that although broadcasting regulation was undertaken to give public broadcasting the central role in the broadcasting system, today the situation is reversed and the public service mainly compensates for the inadequacies of private broadcasters (salter 232). generally, proponents of this view frame the history of broadcasting as a struggle between competing interest groups, with those representing the cultural objectives of broadcasting locked in a losing battle with economically motivated private interests. this paper places the history of public broadcasting, as represented in the canadian broadcasting corporation (cbc), in a different perspective. focusing on the historical relations constructed between the state and private capital through intervention, it demonstrates that the structure of regulation has subordinated public broadcasting to the economic interests of private broadcasters since the legislation of the 1932 broadcasting act. while the history of broadcasting is indeed the product of real historical struggles, the regulatory framework has contextualized these struggles so as to foreground the reproduction of private capital. in this way, the marginal ization of public broadcasting can be seen as more the product of the regulatory framework than the political prowess of any particular interest group . the state, capital, and regulatory instruments the history of broadcasting regulation is of course inextricably bound up within the history of the canadian state. from the rationales that have both prompted and guided intervention, to the regulatory bodies that have shepherded the growth of the system, to the political -economic forces that have contextualized its growth the state and its attendant instruments and policies have played a central role in shaping the broadcasting system. to develop a purchase on why public broadcasting is now marginal to private interests within the broadcasting system, the historical relations between the state and private capital must be examined. tracing such relations has long been the project of canadian political econcr.iy. here, the growth of private capital in canada 26 has often been seen as fostered by government intervention. as aitken (184) notes: the standard interpretation of the entire history of the canadian economy assigns to the state a major role in guiding and stimulating development; on any reading of the historical record government policies and decisions stand out as the key factor. moreover, panitch (14) writes that the state has "provided the technical infrastructure for capitalist development when this was too risky or costly for private capital to undertake itself, "and that state ownership has not traditionally been undertaken "with the aim of managing or controlling the economy, but always with a view to facilitating further capital accumulation in the private sphere to the end of economic growth." however, there is little consensus as to why or how the state has acted in this manner. marchak (692) illustrates that the literature in this area has traditionally forwarded two basic perspectives on the canadian state: i) an "instrumentalist version," which leads to the expectation that the state "heeds capitalist demands in specific instances"; ii) a structuralist version, which instead suggests that the state "has 'relative autonomy' from business and introduces legislation in response to numerous pressures." while the instrumental approach is useful for sketching social relations in particular historical moments, it portrays the state as subject to the whims of particular individuals or elites and offers little illustration of how the structure of the state constrains relationships between the state and private capital. the structuralist perspective, while moving to overcome this weakness, often falls prey to a functionalist vision of the relations between the state and private capital and fails to illustrate how these relationships are maintained through changing social conditions. the work of claus offe offers a way out of this impasse. for offe (13), the impetus to state intervention is embedded in the very structure of the capitalist system which leaves the state both dependent on the process of accumulation for its survival and yet prohibits it from "organizing" production according to its own political criteria (because) "property is private." thus the state is trapped in contradiction: on one hand, forced to intervene in the economy to guarantee its own reproduction; on the other, to structure its interventions such that they do not interfere with the prerogatives of private capital. in accomplishing this the state "protects and sanctions a set of rules and social relationships" which give rise to accumulation. over periods of time, these practices are sedimented into institutional relations between the state and private capital . here the state is not the instrument of the ruling class, nor does it defend the interests of one class in some mechanistic way. rather, by contextualizing social struggles in terms of reproduction of private capital, it 27 protects the "common interest of all members of a capitalist class society." following offe's line of analysis, both the regulatory commission and the crown corporation, instruments central to the broadcasting system, can be seen as sets of institutional relationships born of government support for the orderly growth and maintenance of capital accumulation: the former acting as an arbiter between competing interests; the latter providing infrastructure for capital development. the first regulatory commission was instituted in 1903 for the resolution of problems between competing economic interests in the operation of the railways. as the railways opened up areas of the country for exploitation, tensions developed between railway companies and economic interests situated in the hinterland. the structure of the state proved inadequate for dealing with this competition, and pressure mounted for an "independent" agency that would possess both the expertise to make decisions regarding railways and be distant enough from government to be somewhat insulated from political currents of perquisites and patronage. the regulatory commission combined legislative, judicial, and executive functions in one structure and basically functioned to adjudicate disputes between private interests and offer some assurance of the regular operation of these vital links in the economic infrastructure. the literature on regulatory commissions generally interprets their evolution in one of two ways: older works see state intervention as moving to "correct the failures of the marketplace, enhance the quality of life, and ensure economic efficiency and minimum rates by bringing a broader conception of public responsibility to bear on the conduct of private monopoly;" while more recent analyses forward "a much more critical 'capture' theory, which holds that regulatory agencies almost invariably become servants rather than masters of the industries over which they preside, and that in the rational pursuit of its long term security, business actively sought state regulation to escape the travails of the market," (nelles 189). however, questions of whether or not regulation was instituted at the behest of industry tend to obscure larger questions regarding the role of the regulatory commission in the economy. as the privy council (110) notes : regulatory commissions ... exists largely because the adjudicative role which they perform could not be performed by departments under the more or less continuous direction of a minister ... commissions and tribunals are uniquely constructed to dispense privileges usually amongst competing interests and arbitrate rights . indeed, in their dispensing of privileges and rights the board of railway commissioners and its progenitors can be seen as dedicated 28 to the smooth allocation of property rights and the orderly growth and maintenance of private capital . whether adjudicating between directly competing groups of private capital, or between monopoly capital and the "public interest", they foreground an allocative rationale that focuses on the growth or development of the system within which they are embedded. in fulfilling this role, the regulatory commission constructs a particular set of relations between the state and private capital relations which are not dependent on the policy stream in which the instrument is located. government ownership too was born out of pragmatic necessities in the maintenance of capital accumulation. with the union act of 1840, the state became directly involved in the development of economic infrastructure such as canals and railways. innis (1933: 80) offers a summary of the operational imperative of this activity : government ownership is fundamentally a phenomenon peculiar to a new country, and an effective weapon by which the government has been able to bring together the retarded development and the possession of vast natural resources, matured technique, and a market favourable to the purchasing of raw materials. it was essentially a clumsy, awkward means of attaining the end of immediate investment of tremendous sums of capital, but it was the only means of retaining a substantial share of the returns from virgin natural resources. canada's development was essentially transcontinental . private enterprise was not adequate to the task, although the success of government ownership has tended to obscure the paramount importance of its contributions during the early stages of capital formation. through both subsidy and direct ownership, the early canadian stage was able to rapidly secure territory and develop resources while deferring the cost of development through legislative structures. the crown corporation represents a further institutionalization of this process. fuelled by the unsubstantiated optimism of the federal government in the first decade of this century and the trials of war in the second, the debts of two of canada's three transcontinental railways had grown beyond the management of the private sector by 1917. after much deliberation, nationalization seemed to be the only way to prevent bankruptcy and the negative effects on both private individuals and canada's credit in foreign capital markets that might arise from it. the canadian national railway (cnr) was the state's response to this crisis. 29 as a means for the consolidation and public appropriation of private debt the new corporation was quite a success, investors were largely protected and the railways were maintained. however, the structure of the company was not conducive to capital accumulation. on one hand, its assets were a patchwork of isolated railways. while these were important for the maintenance of commercial activities in the communities which they serviced, as commercial enterprises they were marginal at best. on the other hand, the company was saddled with a tremendous debt to service and subject to small and unpredictable parliamentary appropriations for working capital. as innis (1933: 58) notes, this structure placed the cnr in a subordinate position to the cpr in relation to both railway markets and advances of new transportation technologies and, over time, would lead it "to become a buffer between the canadian pacific and the vicissitudes of railway earnings in canada." rather than offering direct competition to private enterprise then, this structure focussed the crown corporation on the edges of the commercial railway system and extended the reach of private capital in the development of national resources. further to this point, innis (1933: 55-56) writes: government ownership at present represents a force in favour of continued and rapid exploitation, and there is little evidence that it is being used, or that it can be used, as a weapon designed for other purposes of importance to the canadian people in the long run. government ownership will continue to be a most potent factor in the rapid development of the country. historically then, these regulatory instruments sedimented particular sets of relations between the state and private capital in institutional form: the regulatory commission working to safeguard the smooth allocation of resources and expedite the orderly expansion of capital; state ownership, with its focus on commercially marginal activities, working to extend the reach of private capital in the development of resources. the origins of public broadcasting prang notes that the introduction of public broadcasting to canada was a move of "defensive expansionism" as the state strove to protect and nurture its broadcasting resources from the intrusion of american broadcasting signals. however, this intervention was not motivated solely by economic concerns, for radio broadcasting was imbued with nationalist cultural significance early in its history. to understand how these cultural concerns structure broadcasting policy, some illustration of the historical significance of the nationalist ideal that gives rise to these concerns and its relation to the canadian state is necessary . 30 as charland (202) illustrates, the early development of the canadian nation state had both physical and discursive components: (1) the existence of a transcontinental canada required the development of a system of transportation facilitating territorial annexation, colonization, and the implantation of a physical presence. (2) the existence of this canada also required the development of a rhetoric which ideologically constituted those in canada as canadians, united in the national project and under the political authority of a national government. through constituting a particular set of historical subjects, this discourse constructed the idea of a "canadian" nation state. legitimated by this notion of nation, the state was empowered to intervene in the economy and undertake the physical components of nation building. however, once the project of confederation was firmly underway, this "discourse of nationalism" did not simply disappear. it remained a central legitimating force in underwriting federal initiatives. while the discourse of nationalism informed the practice of radio broadcasting in the early 1920's, it was not until the report of the royal commission on radio broadcasting (aird report) that it became central to the development of broadcasting policy. informed by a commercial rationale, private broadcasting in canada was largely constructed as an extension of american broadcasting empires. this inhibited the growth of a canadian based industry and raised nationalist concerns. building on these concerns, the aird report (6) stated that radio "could become a great agency in fostering national consciousness and unity" but because of the preponderance of foreign programming available "the minds, ideals, and opinions of canadians, particularly the young, are being shaped into moulds not specifically canadian." here then, the commission implicitly recognized what innis (1951) would call the "space binding" nature of the new medium. central to this vision, was a conception of the medium as a purveyor of nationalist cultural ideas the might bind the country together. from aird on, these nationalist concerns became a central feature of broadcasting policy discussions. these concerns, in concert with the structure of regulation, set up a series of relations between the state, private capital, and the practice of broadcasting relations which have been instrumental in the marginalization of public broadcasting in canada. the struggle for public broadcasting that followed the aird report is well documented in the literature and does not need to be rehearsed in detail here. it is generally argued that with the legislation of the 1932 broadcasting act and the institution of the canadian radio broadcasting commission (crbc) the nationalist forces won the day, (prang). indeed, the discourse of nationalism 31 and its attendant concerns appear to firmly undergird prime minister r. b. bennett's speech to the house of commons introducing the first broadcasting act: this country must be assured of complete canadian control of broadcasting from canadian sources, free from foreign interference of influence. without such control radio broadcasting can never become a great agency for communication of matters of national concern and for the diffusion of national thought and ideals, and without such control it can never be the agency by which consciousness may be fostered and sustained and national unity still further strengthened. .. .no other scheme than that of public ownership can ensure to the people of this country, without regard to class or place, equal enjoyment of the benefits and pleasures of radio broadcasting. private ownership must necessarily discriminate between densely and sparsely populated areas.... happily... under this system there is no need for discrimination: all may be served alike. (cited in peers 101-102.) however, in practice, the crbc fell short of being the "great agency" promised in bennett's speech. the crbc was somewhat of a hybrid of the regulatory commission and crown corporation: on one hand, empowered to regulate private broadcasting; on the other, charged with carrying on the business of broadcasting in canada. this division of responsibilities recognized the legitimacy of private ownership within the system while allowing for public participation. however, positioned as a government department, the commission's powers of selfdetermination were severely constrained by legislation, particularly regarding the acquisition of property, the appointment of staff, and the acquisition and disposition of funds. attempts to have the broadcasting act amended to provide greater autonomy were to no avail, (peers 118-128). this structure, which circumscribed the commission's activities in the marketplace and left it open to pressure from both the government and the private sector, focussed the commission's activities toward the edges of the commercial system. while enough money to make a substantial step toward building a wholly publicly owned broadcasting system was generated through regulation, the crbc was dependent on the government for passing on these funds and they were not forthcoming, (peers 108-136). consequently, the commission's plans to construct a chain of highpowered stations across the country were stymied and most of its 32 efforts focussed on network broadcasts and program production, (malone, 31). in those early days, high transmission costs mitigated against network broadcasting in canada, (weir 50-55). but because such arrangements were seen as important to the national character of the system, they were undertaken almost single-handedly by the commission. in an effort to induce broadcasters to run canadian programming rather than import or copy american programs, the commission produced and distributed programming free of charge. when private stations balked at this prospect, the commission often paid them to affiliate with its networks and/or take on its programming, (weir 56). further, because of national considerations, commercially unprofitable service to less populated areas of the country was shouldered by the commission. in practice then, the crbc's nationalist vision of broadcasting generally subordinated its activities to the commercial interests of the private stations. in the face of foreign broadcasting incursions, it moved to develop aspects of the canadian broadcasting resource that private industry was loathe to and subsidize the operation of private stations with both programming and cash during the tough economic times of the early 1930's. the role of the discourse of nationalism is crucial here. for, though constituting nationalist goals for broadcasting, it directed the activities of the commission away from those of private broadcasters. coupled with a structure that left it open to both budget restrictions and pressure from private broadcasters, these goals narrowed the activities of the commission to those of primary national concern. as a result, the crbc moved to fill in the void created by the contradiction between the logic of commercialism and the discourse of nationalism and lay the foundation for the development of a canadian-based broadcasting system. while the form of public broadcasting and its technological conditions have changed through time, the basic relations between the state, public broadcasting, and private capital constructed by regulation have remained the same. the early cbc the 1936 broadcasting act transferred the crbc's regulatory powers to the cbc while clearly distancing it from the government through casting it in the form of an "independent" crown corporation. but while it had a guaranteed income, the ability to borrow money, and control over its staff, the cbc's powers were still severely circumscribed by the requirements that it have permission from the governor-in-council for expenditures over a certain amount, for the acquisition of property, or for securing loans or advances. because the ability to acquire and dispose of capital is the essence of corporate freedom, the cbc's independence was in practice more of a possibility than an achievement. this structure, combined with its sel f -espoused national mandate, continued to focus the public broadcaster's commercial, network, 33 was in practice more of a possibility than an achievement. this structure, combined with its sel f -espoused national mandate, continued to focus the public broadcaster's commercial, network, and programming policies away from the practices of private broadcasters and toward the development of the national system. network activities were again structured in favour of private capital. while network broadcasting in the late 1930's was still not lucrative enough to attract private investment, it continued to form a major portion of the cbc's activities. private stations formed an important role in this network, filling in large gaps in national coverage. revenue sharing arrangements for such broadcasts were more generous than those american stations struck with their affiliates, and little if any pressure appears to have been exerted on private stations to join the cbc network or carry cbc programming (malone 34). as the economic climate improved and the cbc demonstrated the viability of network operations, pressure from the private sector resulted in both an increase in the cbc's national network coverage and the relaxing of network affiliation rules to allow private stations to form their own regional networks . through this period the cbc's production practices continued to offer little interference with the private sector. production often focused on types of programming that were considered to be either culturally enriching or of national significance, such as symphonies and radio plays or "actuality" broadcasts and current affairs. these types of programming were not particularly attractive to advertisers because of their narrow audience appeal and/or expense. advertising practices too were different from those of private broadcasters. in an attempt to set a high standard for advertising content, the cbc formulated a commercial acceptance policy which considerably narrowed the types of advertising revenue it would accept. further, because it perceived itself as a "national" broadcaster, the cbc does not appear to have contracted either local business or spot advertising through the 1940's, leaving this business for private broadcasters (weir 200203) . the crown corporation structure also left the cbc both financially and authoritatively ill-equipped to regulate the activities of the private sector. transgressions regarding commercial activity, content requirement, and promises of performance were often reprimanded yet evaded punishment in the face of unclear authority. these problems continued to grow through the 1940 's and were compounded after world war ii with the introduction of television in the united states. until, as peers (1969: 379) notes, by the year 1948: several questions demanded the attention from the government. first, an authoritative answer was needed on who should regulate and control the activities of the 34 private stations; their scope and function had to be defined or restated. second financial provision had to be made for the cbc; the license fee... was now clearly inadequate... third, there was the new problem of television. the country, it seemed, would be faced with the same kinds of difficult choices that had confronted it when radio broadcasting developed. the difference was that the pace would be faster, the costs would be greater and the stakes would be higher. while the cbc began to make plans for the implementation of television in 1947, these were dealt a serious blow early in 1948 when the government refused them funding. from this time until the legislation of the 1958 broadcasting act, the federal government assumed the responsibility for setting television policy, as both public and private broadcasters jockeyed for position in this new broadcasting market. in early 1948 it looked as though the cbc would be relegated to a licensing and regulatory role regarding television, similar to the us federal communications commission (fcc). however, the applicants apparently most able to proceed were foreign-owned, which raised objections from the canadian association of broadcasters (cab), (peers, 1979: 11). delay followed and canadian cities were flooded with programming from american border broadcasters . under pressure from a number of sources, the government announced an interim television policy in march of 1949. this policy stated that television would be developed by both public and private enterprise, with the cbc establishing stations and production centres in toronto and montreal and supplying programming to private stations in other parts of the country. however, these plans were again modified in 1952 when the government, reacting to the nationalist concerns of the report of the royal commission on national development in the arts, letters, and sciences (massey commission) made another major television policy statement: the government believes, with the royal commission, that television should be developed in canada with the aim of benefitting our national life and that it should have the structure and means required by canadian conditions to ensure adequate amounts of canadian programs for canadians as well as using some of the material from outside the country. television will undoubtedly play a considerable part in the lives of many canadian families... the government believes it should be so developed in canada that it is capable of providing a sensible pattern of programming for canadian homes with at least a good portion of canadian content reflecting 35 canadian ideas and creative abilities of our own people and life in all parts of canada, (fowler report: 315). while the nationalist goals of broadcasting contextualized this statement, the system the government envisioned was not a purely public model. this plan moved to establish cbc stations in ottawa, halifax, vancouver, and winnipeg as well as toronto and montreal while leaving other centres open to development by private interests. only one station would be licensed in any given area and network arrangements, still too expensive to be attractive to private capital, would be the responsibility of the cbc. the cbc began broadcasting in september of 1952 in toronto and montreal , and the first private station opened in sudbury in october of 1953. from this point television grew extremely quickly. a year and a half later there were seven cbc stations and nineteen private stations. and, by march of 1958, there were eight cbc stations and thirty-six private outlets, (ellis 35). the cbc supplied much of the impetus to this growth, funnelling $170,000,000 into the development of television between 1952 and 1957. much of this money indirectly subsidized the operations of private broadcasters through supplying them with programming and facilities. further, affiliate agreements between the cbc and private broadcasters operating in economically marginal markets acted as a buffer between these businesses and the travails of market development. after their election, the conservatives made good on their longstanding promise to institute an independent regulatory commission in broadcasting with the passage of the 1958 broadcasting act. with this act, the cbc lost control over licensing and network regulation and was set on more or less equal footing with private broadcasters before the board of broadcast governors (bbg), competing for licenses and privileges. however, in practice this realignment of power relations was not as dramatic a shift from the status quo as some critics claim. the 1957 report of the royal commission on broadcasting (fowler report: 224) had already recommended the creation of a separate public agency that would be responsible for all matters of regulation. while this report took pains to point out that this was not the same organization as the independent regulatory board advocated by private broadcasters, it did note that before the new board there might be "competition between the cbc and private applicants for new licenses." further, because the government had acted as an arbiter between the cbc and private interests in the competition for television licenses, the new legislation was in many ways simply legislative recognition of existing regulatory conceptions and relationships. the al locative rationale of the new board quickly became apparent. as the bbg assumed its responsibilities, the government announced that in mid-september of 1959 applications for second 36 stations in areas already served with television would be considered. rising out of this second station policy, an application to operate a private network was heard in april of 1961 and the ctv network began broadcasting in october. as anderson (84) illustrates, the new stations', and consequently the new network's, success was largely dependent on the degree to which they could "cut into cbc commercial revenues and the amount of programming it could sell to the corporation's affiliates." while both the new stations and the new network got off to a rocky start, with a little help from the bbg by way of relaxing regulations, the second stations were soon profitable while the cbc reported declines in commercial revenue. encouraged by government and its structure as a regulatory board, the bbg had both explicit and implicit mandates to expand the broadcasting system. throughout its tenure it was almost constantly at odds with the cbc over how such expansion would be undertaken. with the cbc constrained both financially and through its dedication to the national purposes of broadcasting, it was inevitable that thi.s expansion would come at the expense of the public broadcaster. 6 the crtc with the 1968 broadcasting act, and the institution of the canadian radio-television commission (crtc), the relations between the cbc and private broadcasters were little changed. however, with this act the nationalist goals of public broadcasting finally found voice in legislation and the cbc was officially harnessed to presenting a "balanced service of information" in both english and french, extending service to "all parts of canada", and contributing "to the development of national unity... (and the) continuing expression of canadian identity," (section 3(g)). while the forces at work in the broadcasting system during the 1970's and 1980 's have been varied and complex, both the structure of regulation and the cbc's mandate continued to focus public broadcasting toward the edges of the system. following an al locative rationale, the crtc sought to enhance canadian representation within the broadcasting system during the 1970's by increasing the number of licensees. generally, this led to a further marginalization of public broadcasting through both intensifying competition for audiences and increasing the amount of foreign programming available within the system. following its mandate, the cbc fought this tide by increasing its commitment to the production of canadian programming, extending broadcasting service through its accelerated coverage plan, and devoting increasing attention to issues such as northern and native broadcasting. as the 1970's drew to a close though, the uncontrolled reception of american satellite broadcasts threatened the whole regulatory framework, (crtc, 1980). in an effort to head off this latest invasion of american programming, the crtc 37 increased its licensing activity further fragmenting broadcasting markets, (crtc, 1985). throughout this period, budget cuts undermined the cbc ' s abilities to respond to these changes in the broadcasting environment. since the mid-1970's, recessionary pressures on the state have placed increasing emphasis on the role of the private sector and the supposed benefits of competition, (mcnulty 196). coupled with the increase in private sector representation, these economic forces have further diminished the role of public broadcasting in the system. as the private sector has continued to fill the broadcasting system with more foreign programming, the cbc has predictably reacted by renewing its commitment to develop a greater quantity of "distinctive" canadian programming. this strategy is evidenced in how the corporation dealt with the 1991 budget cuts: withdrawing from local news production (ostensibly because this service "duplicates" that of the private sector); promising increased regional news programming (a market now underserved by private broadcasters); and renewing its commitment to "canadianizing" its program schedule . however, this strategy again finds the public broadcaster emphasizing values that are marginal to the commercial system and it will put a further strain on the cbc's resources. given that local news and foreign programming have traditionally been major sources of commercial revenue, these cutbacks will bring about both a decline in revenue as audiences shrink and an increase in production costs as new programs are produced. it is interesting to note how these commitments, with their apparently negative impact on the commercial revenue of the corporation, come at a time when the proliferation of private broadcasting services have severely fractured advertising markets and threatens loss of income to all. however, while there has undoubtedly been pressure from the private sector to push the cbc further away from commercial advertising markets, the greatest impetus in this direction appears to have come from within the corporation itself as it has moved to pursue cultural concerns in the face of increased foreign program incursions and focus on developing aspects of the system that are being overlooked by the commercial rationale of private broadcasters. 38 conclusion while the history of broadcasting in canada has indeed been a history of struggles between competing interests, the structure of regulation has consistently placed the public sector forefront in developing the broadcasting system. first with the crbc, and later with the cbc, public broadcasting has functioned to both generate and consolidate broadcasting resources. with their abilities to both generate revenue and distribute it to specific sites, these organizations excelled as development instruments. under their shepherding the private sector flourished, leading to pressure for further allocation of available resources as private capital developed the capacity to undertake more responsibilities. at the centre of this division of labour between the private and public sectors has been the contradiction between the cultural goals of broadcasting and the economic rationale that guides private capital. presently, this contradiction is expressed at a number of different levels within the various elements of the system: in the practices of the cbc, where it is torn between the commercial imperatives of broadcasting and the pursuit of broad social and nationalist goals; in the practices of the private sector, where the purchase of cheap foreign programming is favoured over program production; in relations between the private sector, the public broadcaster, and the regulator, where the private sector is generally found to be in a better financial position to assume new licenses than the cbc; and in parliamentary debates and government studies, where commendations of the public sector are often accompanied by calls for further austerity. these contradictions have moved to frame power relations between the private and public sectors such that the public sector both seeks and is pushed toward the economic edge of the system and a subordinate position with regard to revenue production. however, while the mandate of the corporation will inevitably continue to focus its activities on the economic margins of the system, it need not continue its slow drift to obscurity. through instituting some form of funding independent of the political and economic fortunes of the state a form upon which the corporation might generate future revenue opportunities the cbc could strengthen its position at the leading edge of the broadcasting system. 39 endnotes 1. in this way they represent a step in the historical institutionalization of capital relations between the state and private capital. see dubruc (1966) for a discussion of how the canadian state has historically moved toward the promotion of private capital accumulation. 2. while the concept of discourse presented here dovetails with charl iid's notion of the term there are several important differences, particularly regarding the relationship between rhetoric and discourse and the role of technology in this discourse. for a comparison see charland (1986: 196-21) and skinner (1988: 5-24). 3. see canada. canadian-radio broadcasting act statutes of canada, (c. 51, 1932): section 8 a. 4. interestingly, weir (165) illustrates the crbc's first network contract with the railroad telegraph companies was sensitive to their commercial interests and contained this clause: the commission undertakes and agrees not to employ the said transmission lines for commercial broadcasting purposes and agrees not to compete with the railways in the commercial broadcasting field. if, however, the commission hereafter determines to undertake commercial broadcasting, it shall give to the railways and to each of them reasonable notice of its intention so to do and in such an event the commission shall not undertake such commercial broadcasting unless and until the amounts to be paid by the commission to the railways for the use of the said transmission lines for such purposes shall have been mutually agreed upon. 5. weir (200-203) illustrates how the crbc's close relationship with government led to its eventual downfall with the "mr. sage" scandal . 6. as the general manager of the cbc noted in 1946, scheduling practices often worked in conjunction with program production to minimize audience appeal : the cbc does not try to obtain a mass audience all of the time. the easy and profitable way of doing this is to put programs which are not supposed to be big audience builders outside peak listening times. this we have resolutely refused to do. (quoted in weir 272). 7. see the canadian broadcasting corporation annual report 1959. further, weir (331) notes that "during the first three months of the life of most private television stations, up to 85 per cent of 40 their programs were supplied by the cbc without cost to them." also, through lease agreements, the cbc was a major source of financing for the trans-canada telephone system's microwave system and it often shared these channels with the private networks free of charge, (weir 331). 8. skinner (1988) offers a thorough discussion of how this expansion took place at the expense of the cbc. 9. through its interest in the latter, the corporation played an important role in financing the development of satellite broadcasting as telesat's only broadcasting customer from 1973 to 1981. 10. see for instance: the cbc the strategy of the cbc 1983; cbc let's do it! 1985; cbc new broadcasting policy for canada march 1987. 41 references aitken, hugh. "defensive expansionism: the state and economic growth in canada" in w. t. easterbrook and m. h. watkins (eds.) approaches to canadian economic history. toronto: mclelland and stewart, 1967. anderson, peter. "the cbc and its mandate" unpublished ma thesis, simon fraser university, 1976. canada. royal commission on radio broadcasting report . ottawa: king's printer, 1929. canada. royal commission on broadcasting report. ottawa: queen's printer 1957. canada. privy council submission to the royal commission on financial accountability responsibility in the constitution: part ii non-departmental bodies. ottawa: minister of supply and services, 1979. crtc. 1980 's: a decade of diversity july 1980. . the costs of choice. canada: minister of supply and services, 1985. charland, maurice. "technological nationalism" in canadian journal of political and social theory. vol. x, nos . 1-2: 1986. dubruc, alfred. "the decline of confederation and the new nationalism" in peter russell (ed.) nationalism in canada. toronto: mcgraw-hill, 1966. ellis, david. evolution of the canadian broadcasting system ottawa: dept . of supply and services, 1979. innis, harold. the problems of staple production. toronto: ryerson press, 1933. innis, harold. the bias of communication. toronto: university of toronto press, 1951. malone, william. "broadcast regulation in canada" unpublished phd. dissertation, harvard university, 1962. marchak, patricia. "canadian political economy" in the review of canadian sociology and anthropology. 22(5) 1985. mcnulty, jean. "technology and nation-building in canadian broadcasting" in rowland lorimer and donald wilson (eds.) communication canada. toronto: kagan and woo, 1988. 42 nelles, h.v. and christopher armstrong. monopoly's moment. philadelphia: temple university press, 1986. offe, claus and volker ronge. "notes on theses and theories of the state" in new german critique 6, fall 1975. panitch, leo (ed.) the canadi an state. toronto: university of toronto press, 1977. peers, frank. the politics of canadian broadcasting: 1920-1951. toronto: university of toronto press, 1969. . the public eye. toronto: university of toronto press, 1979, prang, margaret. "the origins of public broadcasting in canada" in the canadian historical review 46 (1, 1965): 11-31. salter, liora. "reconceptual izing public broadcasting" in rowland lorimer and donald wilson ( eds . ) communication canada. toronto: kagan and woo, 1988. 43 pressuring the canadian state for women's rights: the role of the national action committee on the status of women cerise morris this paper examines the history , structure and operation of the national action committee on the status of women (nac) . charged with the enormous task of addressing all women's issues tiith public policy implications , the argument is that the organisation is undeservedly criticised as elitist and ineffective . in addition to its broad mandate , the weaknesses and limitations of nac are attributed to certain restraining conditions : class, ethnic and ideological divisions within the constituency and membership , a high leadership turn-over and the dilemma of restrictive government funding versus time consuming fund-raising . pressure groups, or public-interest groups as they are often called, are "organizations whose members act together to influence public policy in order to promote their common interest" (pross, 1975:2). interest-group liberalism assumes that the public interest and the public policy agenda should be defined in terms of the organized interests of society (lowi , 1968). accordingly, all sectors of society may participate in the democratic process by banding together to express and defend their interests. the aggregation, ordering and balancing of interests thus defined constitutes the ongoing policy process. according to lowi (1969:71) this working model rests on the following assumptions: (1) organized interests are homogeneous and easy to define, sometimes monolithic. any "duly elected" spokesman for any interest is taken as speaking in close approximation for each and every member. (2) organized interests pretty much fill up and adequately represent most of the sectors of our lives, so that one organized group can be found effectively answering and checking some other organized group as it seeks to prosecute its claims against society. and, (3) the role of government is one of ensuring access particularly to the most effectively organized and or ratifying the agreements and adjustments worked out among the competing leaders and their claims. this last assumption is supposed to be a statement of how our democracy works and how it ought to work. taken together, these assumptions constitute the adam smith "hidden hand" model. fbst of the literature on pressure groups is specific to the united states. wiile there are clearly many similarities between the united states and canadian socio-political systems, the differences are too important to be obscured by reliance on theory and analysis generated by the united states experience. as pross (1975:5) emphasizes, "the structure and behaviour of pressure groups are functions of the political systems in which they are located." the little research that has been done on canadian pressure groups is more descriptive than analytical. pross, therefore, has developed a 88 conceptual framework for analyzing pressure groups. the institutional continuum model, as he calls it, distinguishes between "issue-oriented" groups at one end of a four-point continuum, and "institutional" groups at the other end. groups are categorized according to their organizational characteristics. the process of institutionalization culminates in the ideal type of pressure group characterized by organizational continuity and cohesion; expert knowledge of relevant government sectors; stable membership; well-formu) ated , short-term objectives; and high regard for overall organizational imperatives. issue-oriented groups have characteristics which are opposite to those of the institutional pressure group. in reality, of course, particular groups cannot be expected to conform exactly to the typology here, but pross contends that the pattern does represent the central tendency. in canada, political power and control over policy lies within two federal structures: the party system and the bureaucracy, "both of which achieve an apex in the cabinet" (pross, 1975:18). parliament or individual mps are not the first target of pressure group activists. according to one experienced lobbyist, quoted by van loon and vshittington (1976:306), "vvrien i see members of parliament being lobbied, it's a sure sign to me that the lobby lost its fight in the civil service and the cabinet." the task of formulating policy belongs to the bureaucracy; for cabinet ministers this is a secondary role. recent changes in the canadian political process have altered the context in which pressure groups act, with subsequent implications for their behaviour (aucoin, 1975) . these changes have occurred in three areas: (1) the policy advisory functions of the prime minister's office and the privy council office have expanded to de-emphasize the bureaucratic departmentalization of policy formulation and re-assert the 89 primacy of the political executive in the setting and monitoring of policies. (2) the prime minister's office and the privy council office now advise on broad policy concerns across departmental lines, providing cabinet members with a broad context in which to evaluate advice from their individual departments. (3) the standing committees in the commons have been re-organized along national policy lines. these reforms have forced pressure groups to: (1) assume a more public role and provide more expert documentation; (2) demonstrate that their proposals conform with the public interest and national priorities; and (3) compete openly with other groups for material and power resources. canadian pressure groups face a different set of circumstances from their united states counterparts, because of canada's parliamentary-cabinet system (cawson, 1975:35). according to pross (1975), the canadian political system is based less on a pluralistic, competitive approach to decision-making than the united states political system. the parliamentary system of government does not allow pressure groups to exploit rivalries between houses of legislature as they do in the united states. nor is there as much rivalry betwen government agencies in canada as there is in the united states. consequently, issue generation is de-emphasized in canada in favour of access, which as pross notes, need not be a function of publicity. access to the bureaucracy and the cabinet depends upon careful cultivation of relationships and channels of communication, possession of expert knowledge, and adoption of an accommodative and consensus-seeking approach. it follows, then, that pressure groups whose characteristics most closely approximate the institutional type have the greatest likelihood of achieving their objectives for influencing public policy. as pross observes: 90 the canadian policy system. . .tends to favour elite groups, making functional accommodative, consensus-seeking techniques of political communication, rather than conflict-oriented techniques that are directed towards the achievement of objectives through arousing public opinion (1975:19). pross hypothesizes that pressure group success is associated with two main behavioural characteristics: the cultivation of access to public decision-makers in the relevant policy areas, and the demonstrated willingness to accept short-term defeats in the interest of maintaining good relations and achieving long-term success. two imperatives follow: the necessity for non-partisanship, and the necessity of maintaining staff headquarters in ottawa. dawson (1975:46) describes the prerequisites to successful pressure group influence on the bureaucracy in particular: a wide network of acquaintances, and even friends, within the bureaucracy, is essential for utilization of all the opportunities... the group and its officials must have a reputation for expertise, reliability and political non-partisanship. they should be able to provide accurate information quickly; they must be reliable about keeping confidences; preferably they should try to restrain their clientele from great public excesses. if the relationship is working properly there is a constant two-way flow of information. restraining conditions facing pressure groups in canada for groups willing to operate within this framework of realpolitik , what are the restraining conditions? goldstein contends in his study of the consumer's association of canada that pressure groups work with certain inherent disadvantages in the capitalist democracies. "these problems include limited financial resources, limited political legitimacy and particular difficulties in defining their priorities clearly" (1979:137-38). in particular, goldstein notes, "general" groups, characterized by broad goals and the inability to provide material rewards to members, have difficulty in developing strategies to 91 overcome these inherent disadvantages. lawson's (1975) analysis emphasizes the relationship between federalism on the one hand, with its over-riding question of jurisdiction and its requirement that a "national consensus" be constructed out of varying regional priorities and interests, and the financial constraints which pressure groups face on the other hand: the problems associated with unclear constitutional jurisdiction and group difficulty in aggregating client demands into cohesive country-wide policies are the cause of major weaknesses in pressure groups claiming national support. they affect not only the groups' ability to perform effectively their role in influencing federal government policies, but have also led... to financial instability. the problem is most serious for groups vvhich depend upon "voluntary assessment" from component organizations.. .the financial weakness is exacerbated by the necessity of maintaining well-staffed offices at both levels, and it also has an adverse effect on the frequency of board and executive meetings, thus compounding the normal communication problems extant in larger national organizations. lack of money has led to restrictions of activity at the national level or to acceptance of a government subsidy or grant (1 975: 33, emphasis added) . for loney, whose 1977 critique takes a marxist view, this last point is critical in understanding the restraining conditions facing voluntary groups concerned with social change. government funding of the voluntary sector must be understood as an important instrument of social control. in themid-60s, loney notes, the federal government expanded its support in the field of citizen participation beyond established agencies to include innovative and apparently radical groups: it could of course be argued that all of this represents no more than the laudable desire of the government to facilitate the fuller workings of democracy. in fact, government has a very pronounced effect on the way in which democracy works, serving to contain the debate within broad, but nonetheles definable, parameters (1977:457). loney' s data on such recent federal programs as company of young canadians and opportunities for youth lend some support to his claim. 92 as vvell , the literature generally supports the viev; that public interest groups have little hope of succe3sfully influencing public policy if they are belligerent or uncompromising, or if they employ non-routine techniques in pursuit of their goals. the case of the national action committee on the status of women: the women's federal lobby 1. history the roots of the national action committee on the status of women (nac) lie in the campaign to establish the royal commission on the status of women in canada (rcsw) , led by a group of prominent, toronto-based activists with laura sabia at their head (see morris, 1980) . nac was founded by these same women, and the thirty-two groups they represented along with some twenty newly-formed feminist groups, to pressure the federal government to implement the rcsw recommendations. the mandate to create nac was given by the five hundred delegates to the 1972 "strategy for change" convention, chaired by sabia. its formation represented a major response to the rcsw report by one of its main consti tuenci es . as an umbrella organization, nac maintained its diversity at the national level with the aim of truly representing canadian women. nac founders saw from the outset that it was essential to keep women of all classes involved, especially those from the labour movement. working-class women offered social criticism viiile professional, academic, and business women, and some women from the public service, offered mainstream political experience and contacts (lorna marsden, personal interview, september, 1978). 93 2. structure by 1980, nac represented one hundred and fifty non-governmental groups from across the country. these ranged from the large, established women's voluntary organizations which have been the mainstay of nac — groups such as the national council of jewish women and the canadian federation of business and professional women's clubs — to newer "status of women" and issue-oriented feminist groups, such as the hamilton rape crisis centre and kelowna status of women action society, lb join nac, groups must have at least ten members and be sponsored by another member organization. individuals do not have voting rights in nac, although they may participate as observers and "friends of nac." as such, they make financial contributions and are invited to support activities. eight of the twenty-two members on the executive are elected by groups within their own region. the executive is constitutionally empowered to run the organization; its agenda is set at n^c's annual meetings. all affiliates accept nac's official purposes, which are: 1. to press for the implementation of the recommendations of the royal commission on the status of women and for additional reforms supported by the participating organizations; 2. to encourage communication between organizations, local groups, and individuals working to improve the status of women in canada (nac brochure, n.d.) . because of the breadth and generality of these objectives, nac's member organizations are highly diversified in ideology, and class, regional, and ethnic interests. this diversity produces conflicts of interest among member organizations and disputes over priorities. yet nac has never formally excluded a group, and the views of both the communist party of canada and the ywca are aired. for historical reasons, nac was based in tbronto. although the 94 organization was national in scope, the initial organization and executive decision-making was largely carried out by the toronto women. given limited financial resources and the inevitable conflict of loyalties for women representing their far-flung local and regional organizations, it was deemed easier to depend upon members living in tbronto. predictably, this led to tensions and charges of narrowness and elitism in the executive, which, in any case, effectively is nac. the problem of adequate representation of regional interests and priorities was seriously debated in kpic. although funds were raised (or diverted) for members to travel to tbronto for monthly executive meetings, the whole question of regionalism remains a problem for the organization. one member of the executive articulated some of the difficulties and frustrations related to this question in 1978: when i hear the suggestion that regional representation include areas such as "the prairie provinces and territories" or "the atlantic provinces," i shudder. i cannot conceive of one person providing meaningful representation from areas which are so large. in alberta, for example, we face the problem of not being able to liaise with women from the far north and even south of the province. our needs and interests are often quite different and frequently i feel hopelessly inadequate when i attempt to speak for sisters scattered so far apart. ..i believe we must establish what regionalism implies to a) member groups and b) nac. what are the objectives of regional representatives and what obligations do they have to nac and to their areas? perhaps it's mandatory for regional rep's to have back up a consulting group in their areas, but then it seems to me that even more funding has to be found to not only back nac but also the smaller regional groups. funds everywhere are tight. . .being a member of the nac executive is a commitment to work, and electing a regional representative who has no commitment to working or being actively involved in some specific aspect (s) of nac is ridiculous. surely we can avoid tokenism in our feminist groups (pat preston, "regional representation.. .some thoughts" mimeo., undated). the problems for public interest groups with limited financial resources have been summed up by goldstein (1979:139): "since they represent no special interests, they are unlikely to possess any 95 automatic source cf financial support and must scramble for money where they can." this condition is aggravated when the public pressure group is an umbrella organization for voluntary groups, as is nac. f^embers of nac owe their primary allegiance to their own organizations. nac neither expects nor receives significant financial support from its groups or their individual members. annual dues range from $15.00 to $25.00, depending upon size and type of the group. while nac depends largely upon federal government funding for its operations [1], there are pronounced differences of opinion within the organization about the wisdom of this situation. some fear that dependence upon government funding will lead inevitably to cooptation; others that nac has already been coopted, in deed if not in word.t2] still others feel that cooptation is neither necessary nor inevitable. three models for funding were debated at nac's 1981 annual meeting (from discussion paper, finance and funding workshop, 1981 nac annual meeting) : 1. complete self-sufficiency, with all money being raised by nac and no government funding. 2. core funding from the government, with nac raising a percentage of its budget from other sources. 3. ail funding from the government, with additional input from affiliation fees. in the opinion of nac leadership, self-sufficiency is presently unattainable. the second model is currently followed within the organization and probably best reflects present realities. there is no strong current of opinion in favour of the third model, complete dependence upon government funding. the extent to which nac is constrained by limited funding is best illustrated by the fact that in 1981 it was still unable to maintain permanent headquarters or lobbyists in ottawa . 96 methods of influence 1. action oriented toward the policy system nac operates, as a canadian pressure group of national scope must, by attempting to influence the bureaucracy and cabinet. it has two ways of doing this: through its annual ottawa lobbying with cabinet ministers and mps, and through briefs and position papers on current policy issues affecting the status of women, which it is invited with increasing frequency to present to parliamentary committees. priorities are determined by the membership at an annual meeting. between meetings, the executive committee responds to issues as they arise. former nac president, lorna marsden, explained the campaign for 'equal pay for work of equal value': there was a wrangle within the cabinet about whether the equal wages provision should get into the human rights commission or should remain in labour. since we favoured its remaining in labour, we contacted monro and his officials to put forward that view. our contact took two forms. at our annual meeting and lobbying in ottawa in april 1976, we invited the ministers and representatives to come to appear on a panel. our members that evening included well-informed women from across the country. our anger and distress at the ill-informed responses from the members of parliament and their representatives had quite an impact on some members of parliament and government. subsequently we were invited to several long meetings in both toronto and ottawa with representatives of both the minister of labour and the minister of justice concerning our point of view. . . in the meantime, several of us inside the government party (liberal) had been lobbying with the prime minister and his assistants, the party leaders, and the minister responsible for the status of women, using nac materials and positions. women in the other parties had been lobbying with their members of parliament and party leaders. questions were asked in the house and in party meetings.. .the bill was withdrawn for amendments in 1975 and for a long time we had to rely on inside information and our contacts for news of what was going on... the lobbying had some impact although our view that equal pay for work of equal value be included in existing labour legislation was not sustained. the federal government re-introduced the issue as a new bill (c-25) in november 1976, complete with the equal value section added (1979:254-55). 97 although in this case nac was only partially successful in achieving its policy objectives, marsden's account demonstrates the way in which the organization operates. clearly, nac's informal methods of influence were important in this campaign, as dawson (1975) and pross (1975) stressed above. nac leaders are firmly plugged into the federal women's network and many key women in the government are also nac members. [3] nac need not rely entirely on informal contacts with women in high places. among its own leadership are women who have mainstream political legitimacy and political access on their own terms. marsden, for example, is a senior sociologist at the university of tbronto, and was elected to the national policy chair of the liberal party of canada in 1980. many nac leaders are affiliated with either the liberals or the ncp, and have attained prominence in their professional or public lives. in this way, nac is able to participate informally in the policy-raking process. marsden's account of nac's campaign for 'equal pay for equal value' also illustrates this aspect of influence: the bill was withdrawn for amendments in 1975 and for a long time we had to rely on inside information and our contacts for news of what was going on. influencial people, such as the former head of the women's eureau in the department of labour were reported to be against the equal value concept on "practical" grounds. several of us knew lawyers inside the ministry and asked them to get us news. "anonymous" brown paper envelopes came our way. at social gatherings we pressed for news and questions. officials in town on other business would stop off for a chat in our offices. a newly formed and highly effective organization of women lawyers and legal secretaries made presentations and briefs and accompanied us on lobbying visits. the ontario government formed a study group on which one of our members sat. officials in the ontario government, while remaining officially neutral, unofficially pressed us to continue, fed us information, and warned us of impending developments (1979:255). 2. mobilizing the constituency and influencing public opinion nac is always trying to strengthen its support base and inform 98 and influence public opinion about status-of-women issues. oie major vehicle has been its status of women news , a political magazine published an average of four times a year between 1974 and 1980. publication was suspended in 1980 due to lack of funds, but was to be resumed in 1981. tbtal circulation of the magazine in 1980 was about 2,500 copies. distribution was limited to feminist centres, community groups, women's organizations and subscribers. according to haviva hosek, nac's secretary at the time of writing, the importance of status of women news in achieving nac's goals is "unclear," but the organization remains committed to using the magazine as a platform for communication. it intends to launch a subscription campaign and otherwise attanpt to enlarge the magazine's circulation in canada. nac's decision to resume publication was based on two considerations. first, nac was granted a budget increase by the secretary of state in 1980, enabling the organization to meet publication costs without sacrificing other priorities. second, several other feminist publications ceased operation around the same time as status , and will not be resurrected. [4] there is, then, a lack of feminist-oriented publications with national focus and distribution. "our decision to resume publication of status can be viewed in a different publishing context now, which may influence its impact" (hosek, personal interview, october, 1981). all member groups and "friends of nac" receive nac memo , a monthly mimeographed bulletin concerning nac activities and current issues and events affecting women. as well, nac reproduces copies of its position papers and briefs, and has printed a cross-referenced index of all its resolutions and recommendations since 1972. the organization 99 also sponsors and participates in public events such as conferences. perceptions of nac nac is not a household word for women in canada, even though it is the only national voluntary organization dedicated entirely to defending and enlarging women's rights through political lobbying. it is likely that the majority of people outside of the women's movement and policy networks have never heard of the organization. among those who know nac, opinion is divided about its orientation and effectiveness. a humorous comment made by a feminist activist during a panel discussion on the direction of the women's movement in canada conveyed the unflattering image of ^c: "if the major american women's organization is called ncw, ours should be called later! t5] responding to the lack of public awareness of nac and perceptions of it as a pale and ineffective imitation of the american national organization for women (ncw) , marsden said t>pvc does not have the resources to influence the general public effectively. there is, however, a more fundamental reason for nac's style: first, many issues of the women's movement are too complex to be put forward in a useful way to influence public opinion; eg. "crummy pay" is ok to talk about, but strategic considerations of equal pay for work of equal value are too complex. . .more fundamentally, if you look at the way social change occurs in canada most impact comes from influence on institutional authorities challenged in a quiet, straightforward way not from populist protest. we're about change, not protest (marsden, interview, october, 1978). while the latter point (which marsden stressed was fundamental) is not necessarily an adequate description of the social change process in canada, it does support pross' (1975) argument. pross traced the process of organizational maturation within the women's liberation movement from its early beginnings in the 1960's to its present stage of 100 development : demonstrations still occurred but they were more orderly and less flamboyant, and increasingly they were supplemented or replaced by careful documentation of women's grievances and reasoned discussion of proposed solutions. confrontation with officials has become less common. as these changes occurred women's lib [sic] groups ceased to be issue-oriented and became fledgling and then mature organi2ations. . . those concerned with continuing problems or able to provide desirable selective benefits will be the most likely to survive at the institutional or mature level (1975:17). because many of the issues of the women's movement are philosophically and technically complex 'equal pay' and 'affirmative action' are two examples nac favours strategies which put "a group of well-prepared, articulate, and pragmatic women together with those who actually implement law in a face-to-face negotiation. the important point of a_ social movement is to get £ concept accepted (marsden, 1979:248; emphasis added) . nac's behaviour conforms to pross' model of an "institutional" pressure group. as such, it makes no sense to criticize it for failing to behave like an issue-oriented radical organization. in its own terms , nac is a relatively mature pressure group for women's rights; nevertheless, it has frequently been the object of criticism as summarized in saturday night ("building the feminist network," unsigned, september, 1978:4) : what critics contended is that it's either elitist, wishy-washy, ineffectual, invisible, has forgotten its middle name, and is a waste of time and money. for one thing, it remains entirely dependent for funds (about $55,000 a year) on the very government it's supposed to lobby; so, inevitably it has sought to avoid biting the hand that feeds it. for another, it continues to accommodate such a spectrum of viewpoints that it's been unable to avoid compromising on practically everything. many women within the federal government, some of whom belong to nac, either as "friends" or representatives of non-governmental, cntario women's groups, feel nftc has yet to develop sophisticated political 101 strategies. as one wc representative who refused to be named observed: "there is no shared analytic understanding of social change; it is more by leadership and luck than by design that nac has had an impact." another federal woman who is a "friend of nac" said: nac is the closest thing we have to a representative group... it is as effective as the women who come from the member groups, and there is frequent turnover— their lobbying is largely symbolic, but is a good learning process for women. their orientation is more 'women's rights' than feminist, per se, a 1978 version of the national council of women. the advisory council on the status of women is more sophisticated, and has more behind-the-scenes expertise than nac. nor does nac have the funds necessary to produce good research (hellie wilson, personal interview, july 1978) . and from a civil servant in the employment and immigration ministry, involved in the development of voluntary affirmative action programmes: nac is not equivalent to now, partly because it is an umbrella organization and they see themselves that way. nac has been useful in saying what needs to be said, but in this department we don't see any followup after their annual lobby day. . .what the bureaucrats understand is political pressure, and this is what women don't yet know how to do effectively (elizabeth mcallister, august, 1978). the key to understanding nac's weaknesses and limitations as a pressure group, i believe, is to be found in an examination of the restraining conditions it faces. restraining conditions for nac nac's diversity necessitates discussion, negotiation and compromise in order to arrive at organizational consensus. positions adopted through this process cannot please nor accurately reflect all of nac's constituent parts. since the rhetoric and to some extent the practice of nac is based on participatory democracy, internal dissension can be a draining experience for the organization. insiders fear the organization could fall apart over a fundamental issue and some feel that members need to tread carefully. what could destroy nac? 102 centrists fear a possible "take-over" by more left-leaning and confrontation-oriented members. leftists, on the other hand, view the dominant central tendency, middle of the road approach of nac as a fundamental obstacle to "real social action on behalf of women's liberation," as one critical delegate at the 1980 annual meeting put it. this is not to imply that nac fails to deal with fundamental women's issues; rather, the problem is nac's vulnerability to internal, ideological conflict. "the real split is in terms of the confrontation-adversarial approach versus the lobby-andinfluence approach" (hosek, personal interview, august, 1981) . the complex and technical task of defining issues, and the education and expertise called for by the 'brief and lobby 1 method tends to exclude less educated and less politically-involved women from a pressure group such as nac. vhile this may be inevitable, the fact is a source of irritation to women who have been steeped in an ideology stressing egalitarianism, anti-hierarchical organization, and the ideals of participatory democracy. given this orientation, the charges of 'elitism' leveled against i*ac are inevitable. class, ethnic and ideological divisions within nac are further exacerbated by 'regional pull,' which has been a great problem for the organization. the demands of regionalism appear too great for nac's limited resources. scholars such as eawson (1975) and van loon and whittington (1971) point to the impact on canadian pressure groups of problems associated with federalism and regional disparities. marsden summarizes the particular impact of these problems on voluntary organizations such as nac: the existence of two official languages in the country, and many cultural traditions, is a hard social fact which affects every social organization.. .any group trying to bring about social change in the country. . .has to face these divided loyalties. an 103 attempt to build a national network of people often breaks dovvn under the pull of regional concerns. it is also incredibly expensive in money and time to canvas a country over three thousand miles wide with five time zones. a voluntary movement, like the women's movement, is hard hit by these divisions. on issues of major concern, canadian women must address themselves to both federal and provincial legislation and administrations, usually with different political parties in charge. an attempt to build consensus on any issue implies building a compromise position that will take into account the sensibilities of french and english, catholics, protestants, and jews, the economic interests of the various regions, the dominance of central canada, especially much-hated toronto, and the dependent position of the economically poor regions such as much of the maritimes (1979:248). the critical problem of funding is exacerbated by the fact and implications of nac's raison d'etre as a woman's organization pursuing woc.en's rights. no matter which funding model prevails, the problems will likely remain: more government funding requires more vigilance in the face of real fears about dependence and cooptation, while less funding (or none at all) requires more organizational energy devoted to fund-raising — and the prospect, at least, of t^c's disintegration. finally, the fact that b&c is often used as a political training grojnd means that some leadership will inevitably be lost to other career pursuits. this phenomenon is neither unusual nor unexpected. active involvement in nac means participating in a wide social network curring across major areas of public life. training is available in loobying, research and brief writing, public speaking, organizational affairs, and politics. just as the voice of women served as a training ground in the 1960's for bright, middle-class women concerned with social change, nac has filled the same role since the 1970's. because n£c cannot afford a paid, professional staff, it must continue to rely on committed volunteers to carry out its executive work. yet recruiting capable women is becoming increasingly difficult; of all women, feminists are the most likely to be actively pursuing careers, higher 104 education, and other avenues to "a larger humanity." members of the executive work ten hours a week for n£c, on the average, in addition to their professional and personal commitments. che member of nac's executive said that, even though there .is a turnover, nac never completely loses its people, because they so frequently move on to positions of prominence and influence in canadian society and politics, carrying with them their identification with nac's objectives. [6] in this respect, at least, a high turnover on the nac executive has some benefit for the organization. conclusions nac's self-appointed task is enormous. the organization addresses, in effect, all women's issues with public policy implications. although nac focuses on the federal government, it frequently gives its attention to provincial politics as well. yet nac does not possess the resources to support offices and activities at the provincial level nor to maintain a systematic and effective follow-through or monitoring function in ottawa. instead, contacts in the advisory council on the status of women, office of the coordinator status of women and the various ministries must be relied upon for inside information. without funds for professional staff to perform research and public relations functions, nac must nonetheless be well-informed and able to demonstrate its technical expertise on any of the issues it is promoting. furthermore, nac must continue to inform the women's movement by producing regular newsletters and a magazine. women newly-elected to the executive as representatives of their grass-roots organizations often lack political sophistication. women 105 generally have not been encouraged, or afforded opportunities, to acquire this kind of learning. hence, political naivete frequently goes hand in hand with earnestness among the ranks of nac activists. it is important to appreciate fully all the conditions which shape and determine l^c's role in the policy system. some of these conditions are common to all pressure groups in canada; others are unique, or are exaggerated, because nac is a women's organization dedicated to changing the status of women. trie more we appreciate these conditions, the less we need to criticize nac for those things over which it has little or no control. as one informant said: "wc may not be everything we would wish for, but in reality, it's all we've got!" notes * this paper is a slightly modified version of a chapter in my doctoral dissertation, "no more than simple justice: the royal commission on the status of women and social change in canada" (mcgill university, department of sociology, 1982) . the data were gathered over the period 1978-1981 through personal interviews with representatives of nac's leadership, participants from member organizations and informed observers; and through study of organizational documents and participant-observation at several executive and annual general meetings of mac. [1] see morris (1982, chapter 8) for a discussion of the question of government funding of canadian women's groups. [2] loney (1977) analyzes government funding in the field of citizens' participation as a deliberate system of social control. [3] one is reminded of the feminist slogan: "we are everywhere!" more precisely, women are everywhere, though not all women are feminists nor even strongly pro-women in their sympathies. nevertheless, the j unique advantage possessed by nac as a pressure group is its raison d'etre . the women's network cuts across divisions which might block or limit the promotion of other issues or causes. the cooptable communications network which freeman (1975) posed as crucial to the formation of a social network is well-developed . its potential is even greater, since women not already active in or convinced about feminist issues may still be won over when they see the relevance to _ 106 _ their personal lives of the issue of sexual discrimination. as the ideas and vocabulary of the women's movement continue to gain currency, more women in strategic sectors will likely be recruited to the feminist cause. as lorna marsden observed: "there are two kinds of people in the bureaucracy for informal contacts nac members or converts" (from interview, october, 1978). [4] these include: branching out , upstream , and for a while, canadian women's studies . [5] my former colleague, roberta hamilton, gets the credit for this comment, though she may have been quoting a standard joke in feminist circles. [6] lynn verge, who was on the executive in 1978-79, was asked by the newfoundland progressive-conservatives to run for public office. she did, and became minister of education in newfoundland. carol swan, at the time of writing, was directing in-house economic research for the office of the coordinator status of women. and lynn macebnald and laura sabia have both run (unsuccessfully) for public office. pat preston from alberta served as an assistant to lloyd axworthy, who held the federal status of women portfolio in the federal government in 1980. wendy lawrence, executive assistant to doris anderson at the advisory council on the status of women, is a former part-time staff member at nac. lorna marsden and grace hartman remain accessible to nac. references aucoin, peter 1975 "pressure groups and recent changes in the policy-making process", paul a. pross (ed.) , pressure group behaviour in canadian politics . toronto: mcgraw-hill ryerson ltd. dawson, helen 1975 "national pressure groups and the federal government", paul a. pross (ed.) , pressure group behaviour in canadian politics . toronto: mcgraw-hill ryerson ltd. freeman, jo 1975 the politics of women's liberation . new york: david mckay co. goldstein, jonah 1979 "public interest groups and public policy: the case of the consumers association of canada", canadian journal of political science , 12(1) . loney, martin 1977 "a political economy of citizen participation", leo panitch (ed .) , the canadian state: political economy and political power . toronto: university of toronto press. 107 lowi , theodore, j. 1969 the end of liberalism: ideology, policy and the crisis of public authority . new york: norton. marsden, lorna , r. 1979 "the role of the national action commitee on the status of women in facilitating equal pay policy in canada", ronnie steinberg ratner (ed.) , equal employment policy for women , philadelphia: temple university press. morris, cerise 1980 "determination and thoroughness: the movement for a royal commission on the status of women in canada", atlantis 5(2) 1982 "no more than simple justice: the royal commission on the status of women and social change in canada", unpublished doctoral dissertation, mcgill university, 1982. national action committee on the status of women 1972 report of "strategy for change" convention, toronto. national ad hoc action committee on the status of women in canada 1972 submission to the government of canada, toronto. pross, paul a. (ed.) 1975 pressure group behaviour in canadian politics . toronto: mcgraw-hill ryerson, ltd. van loon, richard j. and michael s. whittington 1976 the canadian political system: environment, structure and process. toronto: mcgraw-hill ryerson, ltd, 2nd edition. interviews with the following people were conducted as part of the research for this paper: doris anderson, haviva hbsek, elizabeth mcallister, kay macpherson, maureen o'neil , laura sabia, and hellie wilson. i gratefully acknowledge their help, as well as that of other individuals connected to the women's movement who are too numerous to mention individually. 108 multiple files are bound together in this pdf package. adobe recommends using adobe reader or adobe acrobat version 8 or later to work with documents contained within a pdf package. by updating to the latest version, you’ll enjoy the following benefits: • efficient, integrated pdf viewing • easy printing • quick searches don’t have the latest version of adobe reader? click here to download the latest version of adobe reader if you already have adobe reader 8, click a file in this pdf package to view it. http://www.adobe.com/products/acrobat/readstep2.html 978-1-926958-01-9 139 play review multinational [g]rape corporation written and directed by ozgur cinar, performed by ozgur cinar and chara berk. 2010. reviewed by: aaron henry1 “welcome to the market time. everything has turned into a market today ergo it is not that surprising to see urinals exhibited in museums”. enter multinational [g]rape corporations (mgc), the play that took this year’s ottawa fringe theatre and arts festival by storm, winning the outstanding original work award. yet reviews of this play, for the most part, have entirely missed what is truly outstanding about it. while several reviews have praised the actors, who were indeed electrifying, or marveled over the irreverence and the spectacle of the play, none of them have discussed the meaning of this play. the meaning has been largely shoved aside, one reviewer even went so far as to suggest that “it defies explanation” (marr, 2010). this is disappointing because it is in the structure of the play where cinar’s brilliance, the play’s originality and its message lie. it is, then, the architecture of the play that needs to be given attention, if mgc is going to be reviewed for not just its spectacle but for its internal content. however, the two are necessarily interdependent. the set of the play is austere. it features a table and two chairs upstage, a suitcase full of different props and two squares on the floor formed by red-tape labeled security. the play opens with a man and a women vomiting through a slit in the closed curtain while eating and drinking behind it, a married couple who are the key subjects of the play. the play scrolls through many different locales in capitalist society, ranging from the interior of an immigration office where the man is made to pay over and over again to gain permanent residency; a doctor’s office where tapeworms are removed from the woman—played indomitably by chara berk— 1 aaron henry is a ma student at carleton university in the department of political economy. he can be reached at ahenry2@connect.carleton.ca multinational [g]rape corporation 140 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research where, as a consequence, the doctor informs her of not eating organic food; the first date between the married couple, to a scene of protest against exploitation. each of these scenes closes with the couple’s retreat to the table. the next scene begins with the transformation of the woman, following a sound cue that imitates defecation, into an advertisement for different products and services ranging from fair-trade coffee, cds or for a holiday vacation. following this metamorphosis of the woman into a commodity, the couple retreats into their respective security boxes where the man, played by cinar, attempts to commit suicide over and over again to no avail. this structure has a number of important effects that taken together form cinar’s critique of capitalist society—a critique that goes far beyond being merely anti-consumerist and anti-security, as other reviewers have commented on. foremost, the play is presented as a number of instances between subjects. the thread of unity that binds these instances is not that of unified characters with a linear narrative but the existence of the market within these relations. this is perhaps epitomized by the scene where the man applies for a study permit and then a permanent residency card to integrate into canada. this scene unfolds as primarily a monetary 141 relationship between the man and the canadian immigration officer who remains alienated from the man and treats him from a distance established by both the cash relationship and the sterile rationality of the bureaucracy. similarly, on the couple’s first date the romantic evening is disrupted as the woman laments that she must “take a dump” but that they can’t afford access to a toilet. the scene sublimates the tender moment of the couple back into the market. the love between them cannot exist without the commodification of the most basic and biological human needs. multinational [g]rape corporation 142 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research mgc produces its scenes around subjects that are produced by market relations. this forecloses on the unified character one would find in the classic plays of shakespeare, jonson, wilde, synge, etc. and substitutes this character for a fragmented subject that develops and disappears in line with the market relations that cinar exposes. the play progresses not as a linear narrative but as a process of interaction between fragmented subjects as the man and woman transform before the audience, into police officers, immigration officials, doctors, waiters and lovers. the subjects are then formed in context to the power relations that develop within capitalist society and, as such, they develop and disappear discontinuously and through this disclose the totality of these relations. this structure conveys the message that the market has fully crept into social life, to the degree where one is at once an advertisement and a person. living under these conditions produces a number of contradictions that constitute the insanity and hypocrisy of living in capitalist society. market society then, produces not only fragmented subjects but the complete fragmentation of social life. this fragmentation allows the brutality of capitalism to colonize the human condition. as cinar laments, we get urinals next to the wonders of human history, cosmetics next to the death tolls in afghanistan and iraq, the marketing of vacations alongside brutal exploitation and dictatorship. cinar reveals the societal response to this through the couples retreat to their own private security boxes, provided to them by the market. in this sense, the complete commodification of social life finds its terminal point of expression in the partitioning of our own social beings from these processes and our own feeble attempts to secure ourselves from them. the consequences mgc aptly shows is the reinforcement of our own alienation from ourselves and from each other, precisely because we all form part of capitalist society. the man, in particular, is a paragon of this reality as he attempts suicide in his own private security box to end his imprisonment from the market only to be distracted by the very processes he revolts against in disgust. his repeated failure to commit suicide is caused by his inability to see that he himself constitutes part of this market society. cinar in fact lays this theme out quite clearly and succinctly in the opening lines when the woman declares “we are the flowers of the commercial world. we are the vomit of the commercial world”. they, like all of us, are at once both of these things, nurtured and cared for as consumers, the subjects of society and at once the objects of it the refuse, the labourers who are exploited to constitute its existence. the tragedy and insanity is that the couple cannot recognize themselves as the subjects that constitute the processes that transform them into these wretched objects. 143 this is one of the central messages of mgc. the structure of the play conforms to that of capitalist society insofar as capitalist society cannot be understood through a single narrative. instead it can only be understood under the fragmentary conditions its relations of exploitation and alienation produce. superficially this reality appears disjointed, chaotic, and beyond explanation. however, with greater focus we see ourselves as the subjects of capitalist society that constitute these relations. our imprisonment to the market stems from the fact that we ourselves play a part, much like the man and woman, in the exploitation and alienation that constitute capitalist society. in the end we cannot understand this reality; we have after-all “only applied for cleaner, dish-washer or waiter positions”. we don’t understand that in these positions we ourselves are both the subject and object of these processes. cinar’s play is a scream to see outlining this insanity. as such, cinar’s play constitutes an important critique of capitalism in canadian society and warrants engagement by all. references marr, den. fully fringed, june 28th, 2010. www.fullyfringed.ca photos by a. erdem ozcan. multinational [g]rape corporation 144 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research whole book pdf 270 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism book review mexico’s revolution then and now by d. cockcroft. new york: monthly review press, 2010. $14.95 us, paper. isbn-13: 978-1-58367-224-2. pages: 1-160. reviewed by naomi alisa calnitsky1 in mexico’s revolution then and now, james cockcroft interrogates the parallels between the mexican revolution of 1910-17 and current political conflicts in mexico. he explores what persuasive ideas shaped and influenced revolutionary acts and the ways in which anarchist ideas and modes of thought were woven into revolutionary action. the author also attempts to provide a critical reassessment of continuities between early strands of revolutionary thought and those that persist, however embattled, in mexico today. in his first published book in 1968, intellectual precursors of the mexican revolution, 1900-1913, cockcroft explored the ideas which shaped revolution in mexico. mexico’s revolution then and now is a welcome addition to existing literature on mexican revolutionary ideology, relevant for its assessment of the ways in which revolutionary ideas have shaped contemporary resistance movements. cockcroft highlights magonistas’ influence upon the revolution, including their ideals of anarcho-communism and socialism. scholars such as john mason hart have explored the critical role played by ricardo flores magon as an organizer of a “pro-democracy movement” in mexico from the 1890’s through to 1910. hart’s emphasis upon the instrumental ideological work carried out by the partido liberal mexicano (p.l.m.) mirrors cockcroft’s assessments of the movement. cockcroft draws our attention to the “lessons and legacies” of the revolutionary period, illuminating present-day asymmetries and inequalities. in mexico, for example, the minimum wage remains the “weakest” across latin america. revolutionary struggles in contemporary mexico enrich the narrative, which intertwines past and present. cockcroft affords considerable attention the oaxacan-born revolutionary, ricardo flores magón, 1 naomi alisa calnitsky is a ph.d. candidate in the department of history at carleton university, ottawa. she received an ma in history from otago university in new zealand, where she specialized in pacific island seasonal migration to new zealand. her doctoral thesis research seeks to enhance the voices of mexican migrant workers in canadian labour history narratives. she currently lives in montreal, quebec. book review: mexico’s revolution then and now | 271 and the anti-imperialist mexican liberal party. in 1906 the p.l.m. disseminated an agenda for radical agrarian reform for communities dispossessed of lands and set out clauses to protect indigenous peoples. significantly, cockcroft weaves in the revolutionary contributions and sufferings experienced by magonista women (e.g. margarita ortega), redressing the paucity of historical attention devoted to mexican women involved with the magonista movement. cockcroft links revolutionary-era struggles to present-day labour conflict. the author emphasizes the magonistas’ goals of human emancipation and social justice and the role of the p.l.m. in co-ordinating a series of strikes prior to the revolution and the repression faced by those who joined its ranks. cockcroft flags persisting labour violations as key sites of contemporary struggle. of note are conflicts between working people’s rights and american, as well as transnational, companies based in mexico from anaconda copper at cananea to continental tire in el salto. the current political scene in mexico is assessed as wholly neoliberal and corrupt, poverty is viewed as generated (rather than worsened) by neoliberal policy, and mass emigrations and union-busting considered normalized features of mexican life. the militarization of the mexican border control, which increased under the obama administration, and consolidation of contemporary imperialism, particularly in oil, feature in cockcroft’s intrepid work. cultural items are treated in connection with the economy, including for instance, the dual monopoly over mexican television which operates under the “iron control” of two mexican billionaires. mexico’s uneven economic development is counterbalanced with the magonista era in which it was believed that the means of production were in need of a re-ordering. the revolution and its aftermath are deconstructed to their very core through a wholly economic analysis rooted in a social history approach. the ascent of the mexican bourgeoisie in the twentieth century is charted and the “institutional” revolution is exposed as counter-revolutionary, antagonistic to the interests of most mexicans. labour concerns remain at the heart of mexico’s revolution, then and now, which unearths contemporary popular uprisings against neoliberalism in the face of state-led, patriotic pacification campaigns that emphasized the “glorious revolution” and championed mexican identity through the celebration of public art. while the study does not go to great lengths to enrich our understanding of the revolutionary period, it does a fair job at emphasizing the ideological contributions made by magon and his followers. 272 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism cockcroft assesses the cárdenas administration as fraught with holes: during this time millions of hectares of land were transferred to peasants, yet best quality lands remained in the hands of twelve mostly foreign-owned corporations, enabling neolatifundismo to dominate mexican agriculture in ensuing decades. the abandonment of revolutionary ideals and political corruption are key themes. his immiseration thesis identifies n.a.f.t.a. as responsible for mexico’s dramatic loss of self-sufficiency in agriculture. neoliberal trading schemes are treated as naked imperialism. in spite of mexico retaining state-owned resources such as oil, pemex profits have not trickled down to the population and this state-owned company continues to fuel american consumption. as in mexico`s hope (1998), cockcroft is tuned into mexico’s most recent social conflicts. cockcroft believes that, while population growth does not create immiseration, in reality it has more to do with how capitalism operates. cockcroft credits injustices perpetuated upon the people to right-wing decision-making, and the book is concerned more with explaining current social ills facing the nation than with actually revisiting the revolutionary period. it emphasizes, for example, the high proportion of indigenous people and languages still present in mexico and the spread of neo-zapatismo from chiapas to other indigenous communities. resistance strategies are presented, for example the modern-day “sit-in” (plantón) of adelitos and adelitas advocating fair politics (actions taken by a female-led labour solidarity movement for maquiladora workers). modern attempts to reinstate political democracy are emphasized, including the neo-zapatistas who champion tierra y libertad (a magonista slogan) and continue to maintain autonomous “good government” municipalities. women`s issues are not ignored in this work. the author’s critiques of transnational capitalism’s inherently exploitative character refresh our understanding of current crises facing mexico, offering a relevant and necessary contribution and critical manifesto for change. perhaps lacking for not sufficiently engaging with the views of mexicans on their own revolutionary past and current predicament, cockcroft’s diligent and methodical work remains radical in nature and should be considered required reading for all those interested in gaining a better understanding of mexico today. knowledge and power: determinations of educational curriculum robert white several recent contributions to the sociology of education have attempted to present and assess the various theoretical perspectives utilized to examine schooling (karabel and halsey, 1977; hum, 1978; murphy, 1979). this work has been valuable in developing an understanding of the current sociological debates concerning education. what is lacking in these discussions, however, is a systematic appraisal of the basic assumptions of the various sociological approaches to the study of curriculum. for example, in his assessment of theoretical explanations in the sociology of education, murphy (1979) sees the relationship between social classes cor status groups) and school attainment as being of paramount importance. curriculum is accorded analytical treatment by murphy mainly in terms of the way it serves as a selection mechanism in the schooling process. he tends to ignore significant underlying factors which may affect how sociologists within each perspective view curriculum. studies and reviews which focus primarily on the problem of stratification run the risk of taking the curriculum for granted, as a 'given'. from this viewpoint the curriculum itself is not problematic, rather the concern is over differential appropriation of classroom knowledge. analysis which specifically centers on curriculum, however, does not adequately deal with the relationship between knowledge and power as this is manifested in the curriculum. on the one hand, curriculum is seen to be the outcome of 'negotiations' between teacher and students, thus downplaying external constraints on the interaction process. on the other hand, advocates for greater teacher and student autonomy in the development of curriculum underestimate the powerful forces and linkages which circumscribe the decision-making abilities of those involved in the educational process. alternatively, the 'overdetermined' approach goes beyond the 'given', 'negotiated', and 'reformist' approaches in its analysis of knowledge and control as it locates the educational system in the complex totality that is society. the differences between these approaches are to be found in certain identifiable notions of each concerning the nature of curriculum. theoretical considerations in the study of education it is useful to recognize the theoretical assumptions, both explicit and implicit, which underlie one's research. following the lead of sharp and green (1975: 4), the theme of this section will be ... not so much to chart the accomplishments of the available research showing just what substantive issues have been researched and illustrating the appropriate variables, but to look at the conceptual frameworks within which these 'findings' are generated. more specifically, i am interested in delineating certain basic assumptions of various sociological approaches to the study of curriculum. as a general r .4 formulation curriculum is that which defines what counts as valid knowledge (bernstein, 1971), knowledge referring here to ideas, beliefs and values which are transmitted in the classroom. recognizing the multitude of theories and theoretical positions on the understanding of curriculum, it should be stressed that i do not intend an exhaustive appraisal of each. i do, however, maintain that these varied perspectives can be categorized in a fashion which reflects the essential vantage point from which each views curriculum. accordingly, i propose to examine four approaches to the study of curriculum: the 'given', the 'negotiated', the 'reformist', and the 'overdetermined' . in the 'given' approach to the study of classroom knowledge, curriculum is viewed as a received body of understanding that is transmitted in the school and is accepted a priori as being legitimate and unproblematic. from this perspective classroom knowledge is considered as objective 'fact'. in that knowledge is perceived to be external to the knower, it can be appropriated by the student, and, as such, can become the private possession of each individual. there is littie question of the specific interests which may determine the nature of classroom knowledge. indeed, the problem of curriculum, from this approach, is one of appropriation -that is, how to make the established curriculum, (i.e., that knowledge which claims legitimacy) more relevant, and therefore teachable, to the student. this particular approach is most evident in the prevailing traditions in the sociology of education: structural functionalism and methodological empiricism (see sharp and green, 1975; karabel and halsey, 1977). although these labels are used to designate a vast number of theories and a whole gamut of research orientations, certain common features can be found which identify these types of work as being part of a 'tradition'. for instance, 55 functionalist theories a) take for granted existing institutional arrangements of education, b) underplay possible structural determinations of educational processes, and c) often ignore the role of man as an active participant in the production of knowledge. by seeing the educational system primarily in terms of its significance in the maintenance of social equilibrium or consensus, they tend to downplay any necessary structural incongruities within the school or society itself. on the other hand, empiricist studies, which tend to adopt a positivistic methodology, ara characterized by a particular epistemological stance to social reality. in this tradition the recording of 'facts' is paramount, rather than the prior issue of clarifying the conceptual scheme operating behind the collection and recording of these facts. in many cases these studies "are guided by structural functionalism which influences the formulation of the problems to be studied and the areas within which solutions can be sought" (sharp and green, 1975:2). as i have mentioned, the tradition of structural functionalism tends to emphasize the maintenance of an ongoing social equilibrium. characterized by an over-integrated view of social structure and an over-socialized view of man this perspective postulates the human actor as being passively socialized into consensual institutional frameworks. by emphasizing the role of the school in promoting consensus researchers in this tradition tend to downplay the notion of conflict. in viewing the role of the school in society in an uncritical manner the specific interests which underlie the schooling process are left unexamined. not only does this perspective underestimate the importance of conflict and ideology.it also leads one to neglect the content of the educational process. in other words, what counts as knowledge and why this particular knowledge is 56 transmitted in the school are questions which this perspective does not address. the school plays a major role in maintaining social order, but this social order itself is not considered problematic. the methodological empiricist tradition can be criticized in that while a great deal of statistical information can be gathered there are few theoretical or conceptual breakthroughs for interpreting such data (sharp and green, 1975). in many such studies an underlying value consensus is assumed. although there may be some concern with power such research ignores conflict. for example, brophy and good (1974: 3) have compiled a number of studies which "focus attention on the individual student's present status, his pattern of strengths and weaknesses, his methods of approaching problems, and his interests, in order to prescribe an education experience which is likely to succeed for him where others have failed". this type of statistical research may highlight the problem of differential achievement within the schools. methological innovations may be introduced to facilitate the collection of data and thus the mapping out of observable phenomena and the relations between them in which concern centres on individual differences (according to demographic, social and psychological criteria). consideration is not given to the underlying structure of relations which determine the patterns of school inequality. being policy oriented with respect to 'improving' the classroom situation (i.e., to increasing the opportunity of various students to appropriate what the school has to offer as it may appear to the researcher) there is a tendency for this kind of work to take for granted the dominant institutional arrangements of education. the results of such studies can lead to the implementation of compensation and intervention programmes, but they give us little insight into the interests which are at the root of the inequality and they provide no 57 alternatives to the existing educational system. in that the emphasis is on neutrality and the method is numerical, methodological empiricism is well adapted to the interests of administration, for it leaves ends in the hands of policy-makers and concentrates the efforts of the social scientist on the means by which these ends may be attained (karabel and halsey, 1977: 17). in recent years, the 'given' approach to curriculum as exemplified by structural functionalism and the methodological empiricist tradition has been criticized by sociologists who feel that research must focus on the levels of subjective meaning which are created in any social setting. the approach to the study of curriculum used by these people is the 'negotiated' perspective in which curriculum is seen as negotiable, as an artifact. knowledge is viewed as a process, something which is mutually created in the classroom. learning is the outcome of negotiation between teachers and students about meanings. "sociological phenomenology" is a broad and general term which can be used to describe the study of those researchers who feel that the social structure is a human construction and therefore 'reality' is that which is negotiated in any given social situation. in the sociology of education that research which raises questions about 'streaming' , 'selection', and the 'unintended consequences of educational arrangements' is criticized from this perspective for treating as unproblemat ic 'what it is to be educated'. for michael young (1971a) the starting point is 'what counts as educational knowledge' (i.e., the social organization of knowledge in educational institutions). young's concern in the early part of the 1970s was over the interrelation of the process of knowing and knowledge as a product. in other words, recognizing that existing categories (e.g., learning-play) must be conceived as socially constructed, young (1971b) was interested in the nature of the negotiation 58 process which occurred in the context of teacher-student relations. basil bernstein (1971) and nell keddie (1971) share similar concerns. for instance, bernstein explores the concept of 'boundary' in order to see both the power and control components of the structuring of educational knowledge. likewise, keddie casts as problematic what were held to be knowledge and ability in the school. the phenomenological approach is lucidly presented by esland(1971) as well. he criticizes the notion of man presented not as world-producer, but as world-produced, (i.e., the objectivistic view of knowledge -an image of man which is prevelant in the structural functionalist traditidn). as an alternative he states that we must see knowledge in terms of "the entire complex process of intersubjective negotiation of meanings" (1971: 75). while emphasizing man's active construction of experience esland argues that, in the schools, legitimation of knowledge is located at different levels, e.g., teachers, headmasters, and so on. the central concern for esland is to examine the ways and means in which teachers apprehend the world and to explain why and how these perspectives change over time. the sociological phenomenology which characterizes most , of the articles in young's book, knowledge and control (1971), has been 4 criticized for a number of reasons. by focusing solely on the levels of subjective meaning this perspective is 'guilty', to a certain extent, of 'subjective idealism'. michael young (1976) brings this point home when he critically examines two contrasting conceptions of the curriculum. he situates the conception of 'curriculum as fact' as being in opposition to the conception of 'curriculum as practice', and proceeds to criticize both approaches to the study of curriculum. the 'curriculum as fact' conception, which arises out of the structural 59 functionalist perspective, sees curriculum as the structure of socially prescribed knowledge which is external to the knower. not only are students passive in this model but teachers are presented as passively reproducing the knowledge which is produced elsewhere by others. teaching, then, merely means the transmission of preordained knowledge. by seeing curriculum as having a life of its own, this conception obscures the human relations in which it, as any conception of knowledge, is embedded. 'curriculum as practice', on the other hand, views curriculum as how men collectively attempt to order their world and in the process produce knowledge. "knowledge becomes that which is accomplished in the collaborative work of teachers and pupils" (yound 1976: 188). the problem with this model is that it reduces the social reality of curriculum to the subjective intentions and actions of teachers and pupils. similarly, by isolating classroom interaction as the sole focus of attention, the phenomenological approaches divorce the process of educational learning from other significant aspects of the social structure. sharp and green (1975: 10) for example, point out that, whilst it may be useful from an analytical point of view to differentiate different levels of analysis -the classroom from the school, the school from the community and so on -it is important to avoid reifying this analytic distinction and treating the different levels of analysis as theoretically distinct. the social processes which occur within classrooms, whilst they may not merely reproduce mechanically wider societal processes, are certainly not autonomous from them. by directing attention to the so-called microlevel interactions rather than to the larger social structure there is a tendency in studies of this sort to avoid direct confrontation with the status quo. insofar as this type of classroom analysis is not related to social structure it may "ignore the constraints under which human actors operate and so . . . exaggerate the fragility of the daily routine of school life" (karabel and llalsey, 1977: 58). what needs to be done is to integrate interactional analysis, which considers the management of knowledge as its central problem, with a structural analysis, which places greater emphasis on power and interests that may underlie the schooling process. a key difficulty, then, with sociological phenomenology is that it underplays "the extent to which negotiation of meaning in social situations takes place within a context of material and other givens where certain things are non-negotiable" (sharp and green, 1975: 29). the starting point for an analysis of classroom knowledge, in my view, should be the ways in which material circumstances affect activity and consciousness. this is to say that i am interested in how material conditions provide the opportunities made available and the constraints imposed upon what is to be transmitted via the educational system. to a certain extent the 'reformist' approach to the study of curriculum moves in this direction. this approach is an attempt to juxtapose che notion that there is a given body of knowledge which is considered legitimate at a particular moment in time with the position that definitions, evaluations and distribution of knowledge can change over time. to put it differently, the reformist approach recognizes that in a particular time-space location there will be some knowledge which is transmitted as given, but what gets to count as curriculum, (i.e., the definitions of what is accepted truth) is subject to the changing objective realities in which the curriculum is developed. central to this perspective is not so much the form and content of the learning process, but examination of the exercise of power in the development of curriculum. in analyzing the practice of curriculum 61 in the school, this approach, being primarily policy oriented, concentrates on the question of who makes curriculum decisions within the educational institution. for example, eggleston (1977) uses what i have called the reformist approach to examine the struggle for control over the curriculum. one of his concerns is to identify the parameters of the teachers'' and the students* roles in the development of curriculum. following this, he argues for the necessity of teacher autonomy combined with greater input from pupils, such that the definition of curriculum knowledge will lie with the main protagonists in the educational process. essentially it appears that eggleston's main emphasis is on increasing the decisionmaking role of teachers and students, as this presumably awakens them to a 'shared understanding of the human condition*. the main problem with this approach to classroom knowledge is that it tends to simplify the complex set of constraints on educational practices and it under-estimates the strong linkages between educational institutions on the one hand and the state and the economy on the other. the production of a "model curriculum appropriate for an active democratic society" is not nearly as 'easy' to achieve as eggleston (1977: 150) seems to suggest. ideally, for eggleston, schooling should result in differentiated curriculum achievements where the diverse backgrounds of the teachers and students can be accommodated by making them active participants in the schooling process. he uses the concept of power primarily in the context of a policy debate over whether decisions about curriculum development should continue to reside in present organizational arrangements (e.g., school boards, etc.) or whether they should be placed in the hands of the teachers and students themselves. the guiding rationale for eggleston's approach to the study of curriculum arises not so much from concern at a theoretical level over what curriculum is, or the <»2 processes through which it is produced, but what can be done on a practical, everyday level to change the roles of those involved in the definition, evaluation and distribution of knowledge in the educational system. there is little discussion of the ideological nature f schooling practices as these pertain to the class nature of capitalist society. eggleston's analysis places great emphasis on power as it affects the roles teachers and students are called upon to play in curriculum development. what is lacking in this approach is adequate consideration of the linkages between schooling practices and the structure of class relations in wider society, and the mechanisms whereby class power and class interests are manifested in the classroom. hence, although he argues that curriculum ought to enhance the expectations and capacity of students to exercise power, eggleston c 1977 : 71) leaves one wondering to what ends such an exercise is directed. this leads to a consideration of the fourth approach to the study of curriculum. the 'overdetermined' approach also looks at the relationship between knowledge and power, but the primary emphasis in on viewing classroom knowledge in terms of the socio-political context within which it exists. in doing so it looks to the specific determinants of educational practices. the central concern is: 'whose interests does that knowledge which is transmitted in and by the school represent?' what is problematic in this kind of study is the content of the typifications and the context in which they emerge (sharp and green, 1975). this approach views curriculum, both the officially and explicitly recognized subject matter, and the unstated norms, values and beliefs that are transmitted, as being 'overdetermined' by class interests. in examining what counts as valid knowledge this perspective maintains that the attitudes, values and beliefs which arise 63 out of the educational experience to a large extent may not relate to the workings of the 'real' world. the school is seen as acting instrumentally to legitimate and reproduce the fundamental inequalities of capitalist society by shaping the subjective disposition of the participants such that the existing social order is accepted as is. the process of overdetermination refers not only to the class bias in the transmission of classroom knowledge, but also to the limits of, and pressures on, curriculum as imposed by the capitalist class by virtue of its control and ownership of the material means of economic and cultural production. it can be said that this approach to curriculum is an attempt to tackle one of the main unresolved problems of bernstein's work how it is that "power relationships penetrate the organization, distribution and evaluation of knowledge through the social context" (quoted in karabel and halsey, 1977: 71). in the next section this problem is discussed in greater depth and an attempt is made to conceptualize the nature of the determinations of educational practices. knowledge and power in the educational process the practico-social function of ideas in their relation to the ruling class is crucial to the existence and degree of hegemony exercised in society. the 'over-determined' approach to the study of curriculum attempts to discover and examine the mechanisms specific to the educational system which reflect the power and interests of the capitalist class and which serve to reproduce class relations. these can be linked to external forces which impinge upon the process of schooling. class and classroom, in this view, should be examined in terms of two questions. these are 64 (a) "what counts as valid knowledge in the school?" which leads one to consider the nature of learning, and (b) "what are the specific determinations of classroom knowledge?" i.e., what constitutes the limits of, and pressures on, educational practices? that interaction which we call learning can be captured analytically to some extent through the use of the terms form and content . although conceptually distinct, these aspects of learning are at the same time members of an inextricable unity. thus, one cannot adequately examine and describe a learning situation within a particular time-space location through reference only to the form of this process, excluding the content and vice versa. these concepts designate general categories of analysis, although the usage of the term may vary in examination of a specific area of study (e.g. the school) . this point will be clarified later in the discussion. by 'form' i mean the structure or (established) manner of doing or saying something. 'content' as an aspect of learning includes the subject matter and topics treated in a social situation and the essential meaning of these (i.e., the image or representation of social reality which is c conveyed to the people involved). to emphasize an obvious, though certainly not trivial, point, the learning process, that is to say, learning in general, is first and foremost a social activity. as such it is necessarily context bound. form and content are expressions of how learning in general is manifested in any given situation. the process of learning is one of appropriation and 'knowledge', as the outcome of this process, simply refers to what is received or appropriated. conversely, teaching is a process of transmission, involving the 65 conscious and/or unconscious selection of a manner of conveying something to another person. being a social phenomenon the organization of the learning process will determine the material which is to be imparted and the manner in which this is done. with regard to this, one can distinguish between education and learning by describing learning as a social-psychic process of human development and education as a social organization of this process (holly, 1975). classroom knowledge (i.e., that knowledge which is considered valid) may be seen as the outcome of the educational process. schooling, as it is institutionalized in our society, structures the process of learning; it specifies the process of socialization that it involves. dandurand (1977: 67) makes the point that, "education is presented as a conscious undertaking of imposition of a way of thinking, acting or feeling". to understand classroom knowledge we must look at the form and the content of the process of learning as it is found within a specific institution (i.e., the school). in doing so we need to inquire into the manner in which it affects the way of thinking, acting or feeling on the part of the individuals involved. again, the specific applications of each term, form and content, become apparent depending on the particular instance in which it is used. for example, 9 study on the illusion of choice focuses our attention on the manner in which something is presented (e.g., as a choice which in fact does not really exist) . similarly, analysis of school textbooks may be significant in that their contents are presented as 'objective' fact, ignoring the subjective bias involved in the writing of the book. in both cases the concern is over the manner in which something is done, although the results will vary depending on the object of study. in discussion of content not only are we referring to that information which is 66 explicitly recognized in the classroom as valid knowledge, that is, the textbook knowledge, etc., which is taught; but also those ideas apart from the formal curriculum which further affect the student's ways of thinking, feeling and acting. an examination of the process of learning, as formulated in the form/content unity can be useful, but insofar as this process takes place within an institutional setting, it is structured according to the underlying principles of power and control. hence, the social organization of the learning process, with regard both to what is transmitted and to the manner in which this is done, will have no little effect on what is considered as valid knowledge. the educational system legitimates and places greater value on some forms of knowledge than other forms in the selective character of the transmission process. to put it differently, the school acts so as to pass on certain knowledge, and this knowledge is considered valid because it has been chosen to be taught in the first place. the importance of power and control in the classroom curriculum is that the outcome of the educational process provides specific interest groups with ideological support for their favoured positions. insofar as that valid knowledge which is appropriated by the student in the school reflects the interests and concerns of a certain class, sex, race, etc., through the structured misrepresentation of social reality, this knowledge can be said to be ideological (see figure 1) . in this particular approach to the study of schooling our focus has been on the relationship between classroom knowledge and the capitalist social structure. on the one hand, that knowledge which is transmitted by the school is problematic in that it entails specific experiences which are protective of certain class interests. on the other hand, it is necessary to examine the ways in which class bias intrudes upon the learning process within the educational system. 67 the above concerns can provide us with some insight into the role of the school in the hegemonic process. the school, as a particular institution, is an instance of the hegemony of the ruling class only insofar as it is articulated with the state and the economy. this is to say that the nature of learning and the development of the curriculum serve to reproduce the legitimacy of the existing social order in a manner which reflects to some extent the constraints imposed upon figure 1 learning in general time/sp ace location ^appropriation— form ^knowledge conl:ent social organi zation of learning process education (selection) > r > t z power > control school (learning) »valid knowledge ideological knowledge e.g. , class, sex consciousness -. reproduction e.g., political power/control educational practices from forces outside of the educational institution. in making these linkages explicit one is better able to determine the concrete limits of, and pressures on, educational practices which arise out of the power relations of the capitalist mode of production. two important notions underpin the analysis of specific determinations of classroom knowledge. first , 'knowledge' must be viewed in terms of 68 practices specific to the educational institution. this point was alluded to earlier when i stated that education is a particular social organization of the learning process. second, when discussing what counts as valid knowledge, concern is primarily with outlining those experiences within the school which lead to the production of a particular type of consciousness. to restate it, beginning with the premise that ideas are a concrete political force, one should attempt to elucidate the relationship between ideas which are fostered in the school, and the ruling class and the exercise of its hegemony. as part of the analysis there is an interest in how individuals 'make sense' of the world and their place it it. this requires that in addition to delineating those experiences which count as the valid outcomes of the learning process, we need to examine the relationship between that knowledge which is transmitted in the school and the students for whom this knowledge is intended. the consequences which follow or arise out of the students' relation to that knowledge which is considered valid will have some impact on the development of their conception of social reality. in effect, the selected perceptions regarding the direction and exercise of power in the social order are the result not only of the form and content of educational practices but the product of the structured relationship between the student and the learning process. in other words, not only is analysis of classroom knowledge important but, as well, we must consider the different ways in which this knowledge is appropriated by the student and implications that this has in terms of the hegemonic process. ideology and consciousness in the school in an effort to highlight features of the complex activity which we call educational practices one can consider a) the question of valid 69 (legitimate) knowledge, and b) the ties between this knowledge (and the treatment of this knowledge), the state and the economy. writers who do focus on socialization and cultural transmission in the school often distinguish between the "formal" curriculum and the "hidden" curriculum. the formal curriculum generally refers to the transmission of classroom knowledge through explicit instruction. it is overtly recognized and readily apparent to the participants. course outlines, curriculum guidelines, textbooks, etc., make it clear what is (or is not) to be taught in the classroom and through what procedures it is to be taught. there is a difference, however, between the 'official' curriculum statements and practices in the classroom. this is recognized in the conventional usage of the formal/hidden classification of dimensions of curriculum. study of the so-called 'hidden' curriculum concerns itself with the latent norms and values which are transmitted in the schooling process. one of the better formulations of the hidden curriculum is provided by giroux and penna (1977: 40). to these writers the concept includes those unstated norms, values, and beliefs that are transmitted to students through the underlying structure of classroom as opposed to the formally recognized and sanctioned dimensions of classroom experience. while researchers have long recognized the importance of studying this dimension of curriculum the term "'hidden' curriculum" is somewhat misleading. there are underlying structural relations in the classroom that shape behaviour, but these are not necessarily invisible to the participants. indeed, as eggleston (1977: 18) emphasizes, "the hidden curriculum is only hidden, if at all, to the teacher; it is clearly visible to the students -probably even more clearly visible than the official curriculum". 70 although there is considerable interest in the hidden curriculum, research in this area varies. for example, jackson (1968) examines the features of classroom life primarily in terms of the student-teacher relationship. his main concern is to describe the ways in which the students learn how to respond to the knowledge or normative context in ways that are acceptable to their peers as well as to their teachers. other writers (richer, 1980; parsons, 19s9; dreeben, 1968; bowles and gintis, 1976) attempt to address the relationship between what is taught in the hidden curriculum and the wider social context. the school is seen to teach general attitudes and qualities which prepare students for their future adult and work roles. where these researchers differ is in how they view the role of the school in society. parsons, for example, argues that what the school teaches is functional for wider society, and that schooling is necessary for effective performance of adult roles in industrial society (hum, 1978). alternatively, bowles and gintis see the school as teaching conformity and acquiescence to the demands of an essentially repressive society. the work of bowles and gintis provides some direction for analysis which links what the school does with the system of class relations existing in society. however, in discussing the values and qualities which the schools teach through the hidden curriculum, they tend to overstate their case when they categorize such qualities as "tactful", "perseverant", "consistent", and so on, as repressive. there is a need to discriminate between the inculcation of essentially human values, and the promotion of values and qualities specifically geared to the stability of the status quo (i.e., capitalist consumer society), entwistle (1978: 56) concisely outlines a general programmatic for this kind of analysis in the following passage: 71 if people are to be classified by reference to the values to which they suscribe, it is necessary to go beyond these abstract, firstorder human values to the second-order norms through which they find concrete expression in the lives of individuals or groups. this task is extremely difficult, however, if one attempts to organize research simply in terms of the hidden and formal curriculum. although this distinction is of considerable value in discovering aspects of curriculum which had not previously been revealed, numerous conceptual ambiguities remain. this is particularly apparent with regard to analysis of ideology and consciousness in the school. an initial problem lies in efforts to demarcate the boundaries between the formal and hidden curriculum. analytically, these categories may be useful in providing direction for study of the curriculum, but discussion of the actual content and form of the learning process can be complex and confusing. for example, textbooks can be cited as examples of the formal curriculum: they are part of the explicit instruction and the content is not hidden. yet, the presentation of textbook information as objective fact 'hides' the subjective biases which the book may embody. similarly, study of the hidden curriculum, which, for instance, examines the manner of which a child learns to give an acceptable performance in the classroom, must also consider institutional means of social control in order to explain classroom practices. the hidden curriculum is a particularly problematic concept. whilst the literature on the hidden curriculum can be utilized in discussions of ideology, to equate the hidden dimensions of schooling with ideology is to impose unsatisfactory limits on analysis. in a broad sense, all interaction and communication in the classroom is ideological. whether overtly or covertly, educational practices convey particular conceptions and impressions of the world. the examination of textbooks is a case in point. history, for example, is not only presented as an objective record of events and facts but it conveys certain information about the 72 world. the content of a history textbook is overt, 'open' for all to see. however, it tells "the story of heroes to be emulated and ideals to be striven for, of villians to be condemned and false prophets to be avoided" (hum, 1978: 192). thus formal instruction involves the imparting of specific notions about what is right and wrong, important or unimportant. we agree with egglcston (1977: 117) that the hidden curriculum acts as one with the official curriculum as an agent of social control. it identifies the students with 'their place 1 in the social system, brings them into compliance with its norms and values and with the structure and the sanctions with which they are imposed. yet the central problem is not whether certain aspects of curriculum are hidden or overt. the key question is to explain the processes whereby ideological knowledge is transmitted via the curriculum. this can be accomplished by examining a) what is taught, b) how it is taught, and c) the effects on the student of the mechanisms used to ensure that something is learned. the organization of the educational process shapes the behaviour of the participants: what we wish to know is how this affects the development of consciousness in students. recognizing the intimate ties between formal and hidden dimensions of curriculum it is encumbent upon the researcher to consider both the overt and covert ways in which ideological notions about social reality are marifested in the classroom. pressures and limits on schooling: state and economy as part of the 'overdetermined' approach it has been argued that the selective character of classroom knowledge has to be examined with reference to how it affects the students ways of thinking, acting or feeling. also to be considered is the question: 'how does the ruling class limit and exert pressures on the production of knowledge in the 73 school?' to answer this requires an examination of the ways in which the state and economy impinge upon educational practices. thorough analysis of the linkages between the school, state and economy is beyond the scope of this paper, but a sketch of some of the ways outside agencies influence public school curriculum can be provided. kith the bureaucratization of the school in the post-korld war ii period the state gained centralized administrative and social control. in the case of the public schools, the state at present has considerable legal and financial control. this is primarily in the hands of provincial and local governments. in recent years, however, the proportion of public school funds provided by provincial governments has continued to climb substantially. in addition, the consolidation of local school boards leaves even greater decision-making power in the hands of 'central' authorities. provincial governments have a number of legal, financial and informational instruments for school governance. central authorities exercise their legal control in the area of curriculum development. not only do they provide curriculum guidelines but they also exercise rights of approval over new courses, textbooks and other material. the provincial administrations play a key role in deciding the terms of teacher certification. as an essential instrument for control, this strongly influences the content of teacher training. financially, a ministry of education can effect decisions at the local level in a number of ways through formula financing and the provision of various grants. significantly, "new courses and programmes are not automatically financed even if they are kept within the framework of formula-based funds" (oecd, 1975: 11). governments also use informational policy instruments which are used to shape local programmes and school 74 organizations. for example, the oecd external examiners' report (197s: 12) points out that, the central production of curriculum materials reaches substantial levels in many provinces, which partly explains the large central staff found in some of them. . . 'supervisory' functions at central and regional level employ a large number of people, many of whom act as 'expert consultants' with a de facto combination of advisory and controlling functions. to illustrate the extensive bureaucratic controls on what is to be taught in the public schools, and how this is to be taught, one need only refer to provincial legislation regarding education. for example, in ontario the minister of education has broad powers in the development of curriculum and school programs. the minister may 8. -(1) (a) name the diplomas and certificates that are to be granted to pupils and prescribe their form and the conditions under which they are to be granted; (b) prescribe the courses of study that shall be taught and the courses of study that may be taught in the primary, junior, intermediate and senior divisions; (c) in respect of schools under the jurisdiction of a board, (i) issue curriculum guidelines and require that courses of study be developed therefrom and establish procedures for the approval of courses of study that are not developed from such curriculum guidelines, (ii) prescribe areas of study and require that courses of study be grouped thereunder and establish procedures for the approval of alternative areas of study under which courses of study shall be grouped, and (iii) approve or permit boards to approve, (a) courses of study that are not developed from such curriculum guidelines, and (b) alternative areas of study under which courses of study shall be grouped, and authorize such courses of study and areas of study to be used in lieu of or in addition to any prescribed course of study or area of study; 75 (d) establish procedures by which and the conditions under which books and other learning materials are selected and approved by the minister; (e) select and approve for use in schools textbooks, library books, reference books and other learning materials; ... (province of ontario, 1974: 11-12). although publicly controlled schools are operated by local school boards, the centralization and consolidation of these boards means that provincial ministries of education can keep a close rein on curriculum and educational programmes. to be sure, the state will endorse those programmes, and set guidelines for curricula, which will 'benefit' society. i would suggest that the 'best' in intellectual, aesthetic and moral standards and values, as determined to a large degree by state agencies, still reflects the class-based paternalism of early school movements which saw education as an integrative and civilizing force in society. that this type of educational control arbitrarily limits the definition and scope of classroom knowledge is an argument which is glossed over, especially in light of the fact that the school does teach certain 'fundamental' and 'essential' values. these values, however, reinforce the legitimacy of the existing social system and serve to 'naturalize' and mystify conflict and the nature of exploitation in society. it has been mentioned that the state has financial and administrative control over education. where does this leave teachers when it comes to curriculum control and development? briefly, two points can be mentioned. first, the provincial administrations play a key role in deciding the terms of teacher certification and the content of teacher training. for instance, in respect of teachers' colleges in ontario, the minister may 8. -(1) (r) (i) define courses of study and subjects to be taught, (ii) recommend reference books and library books. 76 (iii) approve textbooks, (iv) determine the number of terms and the dates upon which each term begins and ends, and (v) grant bachelor of education degrees; ... (province of ontario, 1974: 13). second, where teachers desire to have greater participation in the development of the curriculum, indications are that this interest is based more on opportunity for greater autonomy or for greater emphasis on local and regional issues (martin and macdonell, 1978), rather than constituting an attempt to depart in any radical fashion fro-n the general values currently being taught. the general pattern of political 'neutrality' on the part of teachers in the classroom, however, does have its exceptions as evidenced harp and betcherman's (1980) paper on teacher organizations. needless to say, the principal agent of educational change for the past three decades has been the government. there are several factors which help to explain the government's positive attitude toward education in the recent past. the post-world war two period saw many changes take place in canadian society. employment opportunities continued to shift from agriculture to manufacturing, and then to service jobs (copse, 1972). with intensive family formation and an increasing birth rate we experienced the 'baby boom', and as these children grew older it became necessary to fill an expanding and changed economy with educated workers. the new economic theory of "human capital" called for a highly qualified manpower and the ready absorption of graduates into well-paying jobs served to reinforce beliefs in the value of education (harvey, 1974). this was the era of the 'sputnik syndrome' when the russian satellite sputnik i touched off a nation-wide cold war trauma in the united states. the american drive to protect their 7technical and scientific leadership by making heavy investments in education influenced the federal and provincial governments' roles in the funding and expansion of educational facilities. again, the causes of higher employment levels and canada's lag behind the u.s. in its per capita gross national product were thought to stem from a lag in education. education, then, was seen as a crucial factor in economic growth and prosperity in a technological age. with close ties between the educational system and the economy the amount of learning one obtained became synonomous with the amount of one's life earnings. in recent years, however, as times get tough for capitalism, educational participation has taken on added significance. in that there appears to be a direct relationship between educational attainment and participation rates in the labour force (martin and macdonell, 1978), education is seen by the student as a valued commodity. the instrumental value of education is increased by virtue of the fact that employers have come to perceive education as more of a screening process than a prerequisite for job performance. the result of this credentialism is twofold, as bleasdale (1978: 30) explains: raising the educational ante has induced an artificial scarcity of talent, but it also latently served to exacerbate a commodity fetishism of certificates and degrees perceived as symbols of knowledge, consumed as a means in acquiring other commodities. it is not a case that workers with better educational qualifications are necessarily better than workers with lesser qualifications; rather credentialism is, in part, the response from employers to the supply of workers which have been produced by educational institutions. thus, credentialism has become "a new form of property holding involving 12 the right to work" (porter, 1977b: 9). 78 the linkage between the educational system and the economy is further reflected in the ways in which learning has been socially organized to subserve the requirements of production. on the one hand, we have already pointed out how education is principally seen in terms of its future utility. on the other hand, with the incursion of 'technical rationality' into the sphere of education, 'success* is measured according to the degree of competence in a closely-defined field of knowledge or area of specialization. this sorting process and the compartmentalization of knowledge into specified activities, each governed by its own technical rules and strategies, not only provides the capitalist economy with a technical division of labour, but it also results in the stultification of an integrative and critical consciousness. what is left is a limited form of thought which, to a large extent, simply responds to the determined requirements of technology (holly, 1975). from this brief sketch it can be seen that the linkages between the state and economy on the one hand and the educational institution on the other have no little effect on the control and development of curriculum. in that the state in capitalist society is a capitalist state, it can be seen as an agent of the bourgeoisie. as such, measures utilized by the state to influence educational practices will be ideological in character, serving to uphold the interests of the capitalist class. likewise the relationship between the economy and the school is geared to facilitate the accumulation of capital and thus to maintenance of capitalist relations. the educational process shapes the behaviour of the participants: what we wish to know is how this affects the development of consciousness in students. recognizing the intimate ties between formal and hidden dimensions of curriculum it is encumbent 79 upon research to consider both the overt and covert ways in which ideological notions about social reality are manifested in the classroom. my concern in this paper has been to present the theoretical assumptions which underlie various sociological approaches to the study of curriculum. it was argued that the overdetermined approach has much to offer for investigation which seeks to integrate interactional analysis (the phenomenologist 's concern with the management of knowledge) with structural analysis (power and interests). the particular framework outlined above can provide considerable insight into the complex system of power relations underlying the educational process. in addressing the question, 'what gets to count as educational knowledge?' it recognizes the limitations of the 'given' approach which, in focusing on school attainment, ignores the content of the curriculum. likewise, the overdetermined approach takes to task naive perspectives which look at school knowledge transmission simply as a process of negotiations between teacher and student. in doing so it attempts to situate educational practices in the context of capitalist class relations, acknowledging the complex structural constraints on classroom interaction and educational reform. 80 footnotes 1. the same might be said for certain marxist approaches, e.g. , bowles and gintis (1976), which are inclined toward what karabel and halsey (1977) call a "hyperfunctional ism" that sees a "perfect fit" between the educational system and other major social institutions. insofar as these approaches assume a functional role for curricula, it is not considered to be problematic and the content of the educational system may be neglected. 2. this is not to say that researchers in this tradition necessarily ignore conflict. however, such analysis tends to cover too much ground in order that a testable explanation for various kinds of social organization can be arrived at. collins (1977: 124) comments: functional analysis too easily operates as a justification for whatever particular pattern exists, asserting in effect that there is a proper reason for it to be so, but failing to state the conditions under which a particular pattern will hold rather than another. 3. "content", as it is used here, refers to not so much the technical skills and so on which are taught in school, or to the relationship between technological advances and the development of curriculur. in accordance to these changes, but to the ideological character of the educational process. 4. in particular, for comments on and criticisms of young and his associates see holly (1975: 6-8); sharp and green, (1975: 12-13); karabel and halsey (1977: 44-61). 5. "overdetermination" makes reference to the fact that while all relations are not class relations (e.g., teacher-student), these relations and the practices attendant to these relations are contingent upon their articulation with relations arising out of the capitalist mode of production. thus the class nature of schooling is to be understood by locating it contextual ly through examination of the exercise of power in capitalist society. 6. this class is primarily responsible for establishing the ideas and institutions which serve to guard the social order. this is not to say however, that members of the capitalist class consciously set about to deceive the people or that intellectuals are participants in a conspiracy to keep the capitalist class in its dominant position. members of the ruling class are bound and compelled by specific material conditions to represent their interests as the common interests of all members of society. the class which has control over the means of material production not only influences the ideas of those who lack the means of mental production, but these ideas can serve to reproduce the existing social relations. 7. my main concern in this paper is with examination of the ruling class and the exercise of its hegemony. a key problem for further research which arises out of this analysis is to elucidate 81 those traditions and ideas, values and attitudes which run counter to the dominant culture, i.e., to study counter-hegemonic forces, such as student resistence, or teacher militancy. 8. it should be recognized that the meaning of form/content in a specific time/space situation implies varying interpretations on the part of the observers and participants. with regard to sociological research, for example, the study of curriculum by liberals or by marxists will necessarily be informed by their theoretical vantage points. 9. smollet (1974) provides an interesting example of this in her article, "schools and the illusion of choice: the middle class, and the 'open' classroom". 10. are these repressive values or values of the middle class? entwistle (1978: 56) argues that, "in fact, in western culture, these have usually been regarded simply as human values, not distinguishing characteristics of any class, but virtues by reference to which persons are deemed human." 11. michael katz in his study of education in american history presents an analysis of the changes in organizational models from the paternalistic voluntarism in the early 1800's to the bureaucratic model which characterizes the public school system today. significantly, katz (1977: 393) observes that, the paternalistic voluntarists and the bureaucrats, of course, saw education as_ the educator of the people, leading, not reflecting, the general will and, at the least, shaping moral opinions... they hoped for, basically, an increasingly standardization of institutions, practices and culture in american society. 12. an interesting aspect of the relationship between education and occupation is the fact that along with the degradation of work noted by braverman (1974), the phenomenon of credentialism has meant an -increase in the substantial lack of fit between occupational requirements and the level of education one carries into the job situation. 13. for further discussion of linkages between the educational institution, and the state and the economy, see white, 1980. h : references bernstein, basil 1971 "on the classification and framing of educational knowledge", in young, ed. , knowledge and control , toronto: colliermacmil ian. bleasdale, graham 1978 "towards a political economy of capitalist educational values", in nelson and nock, eds., reading, writing and riches . toronto: between the lines. bowles, samuel and herbert gintis 1976 schooling in capitalist america . new york: basic books. braverman, harry 1974 labour and monopoly capital . new york: monthly review press. brophy, jere and thomas good 1974 teacher-student relationships . new york: holt, rinehart and winston, inc. collins, randall 1977 "functional and conflict theories of educational stratification' in karabel and halsey, eds., power and ideology in education . new york: oxford university press. copse 1972 report of the commission on post-secondary education, the learning societywright et. al., ministry of govemnent services, toronto. dandurand, pierre 1977 "education and power" in carlton, colley and mackinnon, eds.. education, change and societytoronto: gage educational publishing ltd. dreeban , robert 1968 on what is learned in school. reading, mass: addison wesley. eggleston, john 1977 the sociology of the school curriculum london: rou* ledge and kegan paul. entwistle, harold 1978 class, culture and educationlondon: methuen and co. ltd. esland, geoffrey m. 1971 "teaching and learning as the organization of knowledge", in young, ed. , knowledge and controltoronto: colliermacmillan. 83 giroux, henry and anthony pcnna 1977 "social relations in the classroom: the dialectic of the hidden curriculum", edcentric 40-41. harp, john and gordon betcherman 1980 "contradictory class locations and class action: the case of school teachers' organizations in ontario and quebec", canadian journal of sociology . harvey, edward 1974 "canadian higher education and the seventies", interchange . holly, douglas 1975 "education and the social relations of a capitalist society' a paper presented to the british sociological association, march. hum, j.c. 1978 the limits and possibilities of schooling . boston: allyn and bacon, inc. jackson, philip 1968 life in classrooms new york: holt, rinehart and winston. karabel, jerome and a. ii. ilalsey, (eds.) 1977 "introduction", power and ideology in education new york: oxford university press. katz, michael b. 1977 "from voluntarism to bureaucracy in american education", in karabel and halsey, eds., power and ideology in educationnew york: oxford university press. keddie, nell 1977 "classroom knowledge" in young, ed. , knowledge and controltoronto: col lier-macmil ian. martin, wilfred and allan macdonell 1978 canadian pducationscarborough: prentice -flail of canada, ltd. murphy, raymond 1979 sociological theories of educationtoronto: mcgraw-hill ryerson limited. ontario, province of 1974 the education actqueen's printer for ontario, toronto. organization for economic cooperation and development, (oecd) 1975 external examiners' report, "educational policy in canada", canadian association for adult education and university of toronto students' administrative council, toronto. 84 parsons, talcott 1959 "the school class as a social system: some of its functions in american society", harvard educational review , 29. porter, john 1977a "education and equality: the failure of a mission". the edgar mclnnis lectures, york university. 1977b "education and the just society". the edgar mclnnis lectures, york university. richer, stephen 1980 "the unofficial curriculum in ontario schools: a study of ottawa kindergartens", unpublished paper, carleton university. sharp, rachel and anthony green (with assistance of j. lewis) 1975 education and social control. boston: rout ledge and kegan paul. smollett, eleanor 1974 "schools and the illusion of choice: the middle class, and the 'open' classroom", in martell, ed. , the politics of the canadian public school. toronto: james lorimer and company white, robert d. 1980 "education in bourgeois society: a matter of common sense", interchange . young, michael f.d. 1971a "introduction", in young, ed. , knowledge and control. toronto: collier-macmillan. 1971b "an approach to the study of curricula as socially organized knowledge", in young, ed., knowledge and control. toronto: collier-macmillan. young, michael f.d. 1976 "curriculum change: limits and possibilities", in dale, esland and macdonald, eds., schooling and capitalismlondon: open university press. 85 248 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism book review activism that works edited by elizabeth whitmore, maureen g. wilson, and avery calhoun. halifax and winnipeg: fernwood publishing, 2011. $19.95 can, paper. isbn: 978-1-55266-411-7. pages: 1-184. reviewed by christine pich1 activism that works provides an important empirical and collaborative contribution towards literature on action research and social justice activism. in raising the key question – “[h]ow do we know when we’re making a difference?” (p.7) – the editors, through part of a larger collaborative project with nine social justice-oriented organizations, challenge us to think about what it means to be successful in activist work that contributes, in a broad sense, towards social change oriented by “social or environmental justice” (p.8). in partnering with a range of diverse organizations throughout canada – such as oxfam canada, the calgary raging grannies, and the social justice committee – an aim of this book was to provide activists from these organizations the opportunity to reflect upon their work in terms of what factors they believe constitute effectiveness and success, and how they know that they are making a difference. it is in this regard that terms such as ‘activism’ and ‘success’ take on broad and encompassing conceptual meanings. for example, ‘success’ is understood as that which is “described by activists themselves reflecting on their own work” (p.8). this relates to the central theme of the book, that is, in attempting to understand what constitutes ‘successful activism’ in complex contexts, there is no ‘right answer’ or ‘best practice’ when undertaking social justice oriented work. it is in this regard that the editors challenge how success is commonly perceived in terms of linear and tangible outcomes. in contrast, the editors encourage us to think about success on a different scale through the everyday work and successes experienced by a wide range of people (paid workers, volunteers, members of the community) involved within these organizations. the book is organized with the majority of the contents constituting stories from the organizations themselves (in no particular identified order), and with the editors writing the introductory and concluding 1 christine pich is a ph.d. student in the department of sociology and anthropology at carleton university in ottawa. her research interests are in the areas of occupational health, work and labour. book review: activism that works | 249 chapters. it is within the chapters written by the editors that the theoretical and methodological focus is discussed. within the introductory chapters they highlight the difficulties posed by neoliberal capitalism towards activist work. in this regard, they point to the potential of “emancipatory social inquiry” (p.20) in terms of collaborative work between researchers and social movements, and the knowledge coproduced from such efforts. to frame this discussion, they briefly draw upon the work of antonio gramsci (structural and conjunctural analysis; ideological hegemony), paulo friere (conscientization; praxis; participatory action research), and george smith (political activist ethnography). in the concluding chapters, the editors elaborate upon complexity theory, with particular reference to the work of brenda zimmerman (2000). this theory is understood as “a loose network of ideas, a set of mental models” (p.155) which challenges “linear, mechanistic ways of thinking” (p.155) that are outcome-oriented. the theoretical works drawn upon, especially the introduction of complexity theory, provide an intriguing framework towards understanding the complexities of ‘successful activism’. however, a tension in this regard was that they were only briefly drawn upon. it would have been interesting to delve into further discussion of, and identify any potential tensions between, the theoretical approaches. through the use of an appreciative inquiry (ai) lens emphasis is cast upon success and positive experiences, as well as the data sources generated, take a narrative form. this approach is well suited to frame the range of stories of what success means. for example, the disability action hall considers successful features of their work to include building a “sense of community, sense of pride and culture” (p. 53), while the calgary raging grannies highlight the ability to attain media coverage and energize themselves and others through humour and catchy songs. the main contribution of this book is that it highlights how, even in a hostile neoliberal capitalist climate, successes of varying degrees are experienced within the processes of working on social justice issues and that important work is being done on a day-to-day basis in this regard. this is particularly important as it challenges the contemporary orientation of many funding sources in their measures of ‘success’ wherein focus tends to be on readily identifiable results and quantitative reporting mechanisms. in addition, through the involvement of various organizations, this book provides the space for activists to tell their own stories with through creative means, such as a comic book style format in the chapter by the youth project. 250 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism while providing important contributions, the main tension with the book stems from the framing of some key concepts – such as activists, social movements, and social justice – which could have benefited from a more elaborated conceptual analysis as they were quite broad and encompassing. while the intent may have been to provide generous conceptual framings, more discussion towards the potential benefits and limitations of this approach would have been useful. in addition, while the focus of the book is on ‘success,’ and the ai approach is suitable toward achieving this aim, the editors note the assumption “that something works in every organization” (p.24). it would have been useful to provide some discussion of what would be considered as falling outside of notions of success and positive work. furthermore, while the editors introduce the organizations they have worked with within this project, what remained to be more clearly addressed is the methodological rationale for identifying and working with these particular organizations and not others. overall, whitmore et. al.’s edited book provides an important collaborative space for multiple voices to creatively share and reflect upon what they understand as effectiveness and success and the importance of recognizing everyday successes that do not neatly fit into concrete outcomes. with its creative and accessible style and structure, this book will be of particular interest for researchers who work in researchercommunity collaborative projects with the aim to co-produce knowledge, as well as a more general public and activist audience. 7 permanent austerity: the politics of the canadian exit strategy from fiscal stimulus bryan evans and greg albo1 abstract: this paper fills a gap in the analysis to date in examining the political context of canada’s fiscal stimulus rescue strategy and the subsequent turn to exit. the central question in canada, as everywhere else, has been who will pay for the economic crisis? canada’s federal and provincial governments have answered by signaling a sharp turn to austerity in targeting public sector workers and public services. while examples of resistance are noted, these remain far too limited to effectively challenge what is becoming a return to not just neoliberalism but a more authoritarian form at that. keywords: austerity, public sector, deregulation, fiscal crisis, since erupting across the world market in 2007, the global economic crisis has held political centre-stage in the core capitalist states. what began as a liquidity crisis in mortgage markets in the heartlands of neoliberalism in 2007 – the us, britain, ireland, and the baltic countries – quickly turned into an insolvency crisis in 2008, and the worst economic downturn since the great depression in 2009. although the downward spiral is now contained, economic stagnation continues in the central economies of capitalism – including canada – across 2010. indeed, there remain palpable fears of a further slide into economic recession in economic forecasts for 2011. and slow growth is projected for the foreseeable future. the centre of the economic turmoil has been the us, the driving force of the world economy over the last century. as a small open economy with an overwhelming trade dependence on the us, economic conditions in the us have been a crucial determinant of prospects for accumulation in canada. a register of key de1 bryan evans teaches public administration at ryerson university. greg albo teaches political economy at york university, and is co-editor of socialist register, and author of in and out of crisis (2010). permanent austerity: the politics of the canadian exit strategy from fiscal stimulus 8 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research velopments in the us (noted in us dollars below) is indicative of the breadth and depth of the financial crisis (imf 2010; office of management and budget 2010; realtytrac 2010; bloomberg 2009; ilo 2009; mckinsey 2008; crotty 2009). at the height of the us housing market bubble in 2006, a startling one-• fifth of new mortgages taken out are high-risk sub-prime loans, with total outstanding residential mortgages valued at over $10 trillion. but in 2007 things turned sour: foreclosure proceedings by lenders on mortgages increase by 79 per cent from 2006 levels on 1.3 million properties; they increase again by 81 per cent for 2008 over 2007 on 2.3 million properties; and in 2009, foreclosure notices on 2.8 million properties shatter records. into 2010, the numbers of mortgages either delinquent or foreclosed continues to climb. from a mid-2006 peak, us house values decline by one-quarter by sep-• tember 2008 at the peak of the financial turbulence– a stunning $15 trillion in asset value vanishing. in february 2007, hsbc, the world’s largest bank, is forced to write-down • $10.5 billion in us sub-prime loan backed securities. this begins a chain of write-offs and bankruptcies that will take down over 100 mortgage lenders in 2007. by 2008, the imf estimates that over $1.5 trillion of subprime mortgage-backed securities have to be written-off in a total market valued at over $7 trillion. in march 2008, the us government mandates the shotgun merger of bear • stearns with jp morgan at a meager $2 a share after trading at $170 per share only one year earlier. in september 2008, global inter-bank lending completely freezes up on • realization that the sub-prime mortgage meltdown is moving from the shadow banking system into the formal banking system risking complete financial collapse. as a consequence, in september 2008 the major us investment houses are • eliminated virtually overnight with the collapse of lehman brothers, the forced merger of merrill lynch into bank of america and the automatic regulatory conversion of morgan stanley and goldman sachs into commercial banks. 9 as well, in september 2008 the us government is forced to takeover aig, • the largest insurance company in the world with assets of some $1 trillion and a yearly turnover in the order of $10 trillion. by may 2009, the government has provided credit facilities to aig in the order of $180 billion, the largest bailout in history. the us government also takes over fannie and freddie mac in septem-• ber 2008, owners or guarantors of about half of the $12 trillion mortgage market. a cut in half of global stock market capitalisation from some $63 trillion • to only $31 trillion by november 2008. in december 2008, the largest ponzi scheme in history at $65 billion, and • run by bernard l. madoff investment securities (madoff being a former head of the nasdaq), collapses. in february 2009, the obama administration gains congressional sup-• port for an emergency economic stabilization package nominally figured at $787 billion, the largest such stimulus measure in history. by april 2009, estimates are ranging from $2.7 trillion to $5 trillion for • potential losses to banks for collateralized debt obligations (cdos) assets, with half this falling on us banks. it is also estimated that an astounding half of all cdos will default. the filing for chapter 11 bankruptcy protection by general motors on • june 1, 2009, the largest such filing by an industrial company at $82 billion in assets and $173 billion in debt. the estimated costs to us taxpayers for the financial crisis are notoriously • hard to come by from the government, but one official puts the figure at a possible $23.7 trillion dollars. by 2009, the numbers of officially unemployed in the us are over 15 mil-• lion, or over 10 percent of the labour force, with over 20 million estimated global job losses since the onset of the crisis. the us budget deficit for fiscal year 2009 is estimated at a stunning $1.42 • trillion dollars, and 12.3 percent of gdp, a deficit share last seen during ww ii. budgetary forecasts for 2010 are only slightly improved. permanent austerity: the politics of the canadian exit strategy from fiscal stimulus 10 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research for the first time since the great depression, world output as a whole • declined by 0.6 percent in 2009, with the us suffering a slump of -2.4 percent, the advanced economies of -3.2 percent and the developing economies (including india and china) growing by only 2.5 percent. with the us mortgage meltdown and liquidity crisis triggering a global economic crisis, canada could not be insulated from the economic turbulence. nor was canada cut-off from the processes of financialization and credit bubbles that formed in the us. the crisis in canada has not been as severe as in the us, but there are certain features that bear noting (department of finance 2010; bank of canada 2009; mcnish and mcarthur 2008; baragar 2009). from budgetary measures introduced in 2006, state mortgage guarantees • in canada more than doubled by the end of 2008. this included the move by mortgage lenders into high risk mortgages of 40 years and no down payment (after prompting from us mortgage brokers, and notably aig). the canada mortgage and housing corporation (cmhc) effectively carrying much of the foreclosure risk, with financial institutions reaping the rewards of high leverage. this has included the cmhc taking major swaps in mortgages for ‘cash’ for the banks to help bolster their balance sheets. in august 2007 as problems in derivatives markets began to spread, the • asset-backed commercial paper market (abcp) in canada froze-up with some $32 billion in paper not being able to be traded. after removing the 30 percent limit on foreign asset holdings in canadian • retirement plans in 2005, us bond placements in canada increase from a mere $1.5 billion in 2004 to almost $27 billion in 2007. from the fall of 2007 through 2009, the bank of canada begins to take a • series of measures to increase liquidity in the financial system. this included driving interest rates down to just 0.5 per cent, and injecting billions into the financial system through purchases of government of canada securities, but also extending to the purchase of private sector securities and commercial paper. while the lead canadian financial institutions avoided collapse in 2008, • canadian equity markets more than matched the us decline, government of canada treasury bill yields collapsed, and spreads with commercial pa11 per shot up. these indications of liquidity problems moved the finance ministry to implement an extraordinary financing framework (eff) with $200 billion in available funds. with the turbulence in world markets, canadian growth rates fell sharply • from average rates of about 3 per cent from 2004-2007, to just about 0.4 per cent for 2008, before tanking at -2.6 per cent for 2009. positive growth is returning across 2010 but expected to remain sluggish. as a consequence, the official unemployment moved from 6.0 for 2007 to 8.3 in 2009, and has stayed in this range since. as a consequence of falling output and fiscal support for canadian finan-• cial institutions, the budgetary position of the federal government moved from a surplus in 2007-08 of about $10 billion, to a deficit of $6 billion for 2008-09 and spiraling to $-54 billion for 2009-10. from financial rescue to public sector austerity the severity of the economic crisis left little alternative to massive state-led ‘rescue strategies’ across the world market, although concentrated in the core countries, including canada. the rescue had two overarching components: a series of measures to stabilize the financial system and enhance conditions for borrowing; and fiscal stimulus to offset the demand shock from the collapse of the financial system and the severe decline in world trade (loxley 2009; roubini and mihm 2010). the first and most urgent measures were to address the insolvency crisis of specific financial institutions where firms were facing massive loan losses or runs on deposits. in an unprecedented number of countries, the actions included forced mergers, bank nationalizations and, in almost all countries, specific steps to bailout banks by offloading ‘troubled assets’ into the state sector or central banks. as well, governments established emergency credit facilities available to financial institutions (as canada did with the eff and the cmhc) and boosting guarantees on deposits. second, governments (in the form of central banks like the bank of canada) undertook a number of policies to re-establish liquidity in financial markets. these included: extensive interventions and guarantees for inter-bank lending market; purchases of government and private securities and commercial paper; allowing banks to increase their borrowing leverage against high-quality assets; purchase of bank equity to boost cash on balance-sheets; and by directly purchasing government debt issuances and thus government cash deposits held in banks. third, financial regulatory institutions moved to oversee directly the operations of specific markets, deploy emergency oversight of others and arrange extensive audits of financial inpermanent austerity: the politics of the canadian exit strategy from fiscal stimulus 12 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research stitutions. finally, central banks have driven down their key market-setting interest rate, often by 2009 to the point of negative real rates, to encourage lending and widen spreads for banks. as bank lending has remained sluggish and markets highly unstable, this has included central banks radically pushing down the yield curves on 5 and 10 year government bonds. these measures occurred, to various degrees and at different stages, across the core capitalist states from 2007-10 to ‘rescue’ the financial system from collapsing credit markets. to address the shock to aggregate demand, a coordinated turn to emergency fiscal expansion was led by the us government and the g20 states, with governments adopting, in general, fiscal deficits in the order of 2-5 percent of gdp (although with the severe banking crises and recession, these levels were much larger in the us and britain) (stiglitz 2010; onaran 2010). as a consequence, and after two decades of neoliberal efforts to enforce balanced budgeting doctrines, to lower government debt to gdp ratios, and to reduce overall non-military and non-debt servicing expenditures (in other words, to reduce programmed social spending and activist industrial policies), government debt levels rose dramatically. (by some measures, and despite no major collapse in financial institutions, canada had one of the largest fiscal stimulus packages and one of the most supportive monetary policies. see td economics 3 august 2010.) at the first sign of the crisis stabilizing in late 2009, a campaign began being waged for ‘exit strategies’ from the emergency measures. this has been led by neoliberal think-tanks, the financial sector, the wider business community and international financial institutions. one exit is to leave behind the emergency oversight of financial markets and complete the installation of a new regulatory structure so that full-blown derivatives trading, particularly in credit instruments and a fullrange of interest and exchange rate swaps, can be re-established. this exit includes the dodd-frank wall street reform and consumer protection act passed in july 2010, which focuses on increased transparency in derivatives trading, limits on bank proprietary trading, regulatory consolidation, financial products consumer protection, a ‘resolution regime’ for financial crises, and a new proposals for international financial rating and regulatory standards. the new basel iii accord agreed to in september 2010 among global bank regulators also sets higher reserves to be held against potential losses, and more than doubles the key capital ratio to 4.5 per cent from the current 2 per cent (financial times 13 september 2010). the widely discussed financial transactions tax (a version of the tobin tax long campaigned for by progressives to slow financial speculation) has come to naught, although a few eu countries are imposing a tiny levy on certain features of financial trades. canada, in this case, has viewed its financial regulatory regime as a success over the 13 crisis and mainly undertook special policy measures rather than develop emergency regulatory machinery. the canadian exit here will simply be to tail some of the international agreements as they proceed to implementation. a second exit is to return to a ‘normal’ monetary policy focused again on an ‘inflation-targeting regime’, and away from overly stimulative interest rates being set by central banks to spur bank lending and profitability. the bank of canada, for example, has moved the bank rate up three times since june 2010 to 1.25 per cent in september, to signal a return to more normal credit conditions. however, this exit remains highly contingent and no further increases are suggested into 2011 given the fragility of the recovery and the depth of problems still pervading the financial markets. and a third exit – and the focus of the most heated political debate – is from deficit-spending fiscal policies toward public sector austerity. although there is some caution on the rush to austerity, notably from the us government, the oecd, world bank, and the imf are all calling for austerity, with the last notably suggesting two decades of ‘fiscal consolidation’ may be in order; or, more or less, ‘permanent austerity’ (imf may 2010: 30). the first two exits attempt to return to finance-led growth and financial disciplining that have been characteristic of neoliberalism. that this approach is dominating banking and monetary policies suggests how little the ruling classes have been destabilized within states (and particularly in the us and canada where it is easy enough to see the political right and business in ascendancy) or across states (where competitive rivalries over world market shares have intensified in conditions of stagnant growth, but no general challenges or alternative approaches can plausibly be pointed to apart from the us). the fiscal exit to austerity revolves around ‘who will pay for the crisis?’ and reasserts the distributional and administrative dynamics of the neoliberal form of the state. this exit marginalizes attempts to move fiscal policy toward a ‘green new deal’ or rebuilding the welfare state and public infrastructure that fleetingly appeared on the political horizon in the midst of the crisis; and it insulates the financial sector and the capitalist classes for assuming the costs of the ‘rescue strategies’. instead, the fiscal exits are focused on: bolstering bank and corporate profits through further tax cuts and shifting away from taxes on property, income and capital; cutting public sector wages, pensions and employment levels; cutting welfare transfers; imposing user fees; and beginning another round of privatization and ‘monetization’ of public sector assets. the general notion, expressed at the toronto g20 summit and other international meetings, is cutting public sector deficits in half by 2013, and phasing in a reduction of debt to gdp rations after 2016. permanent austerity: the politics of the canadian exit strategy from fiscal stimulus 14 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research across the central capitalist states, the context of the exits to austerity and the political struggles they have invoked have been quite diverse (panitch, albo and chibber 2010). in the irish case, for example, a major banking collapse has led to a severe economic crisis. as part of the eurozone, this has left ireland without the possibility of resort to devaluation to aid adjustment and public sector restrain has been a central focus of restructuring. three austerity budgets have been introduced in less than 2 years. the first two largely coped with the collapse of the housing market and the main banks, while the last budget of december 2009 shifted the cost of the crisis onto the public sector. expenditure cuts of more than $4 billion euros were made with $1 billion of that coming from pay. public sector workers are to take an average 7 per cent pay cut, while there is a 4.1 percent reduction in social benefits including for unemployment. but after a number of public sector walkouts and threats of a general strike, the irish congress of trade unions and key public sector unions have attempted to maintain the ‘irish partnership’ and negotiate austerity. this led to an agreement that may result in the loss of 18-20,000 public sector jobs, largely ends overtime pay, creates a two-tier workforce marked by lower wages and pensions for all new hires into the public sector, and prohibits any industrial action for three years. greece faces some of the same constraints as ireland as part of the eurozone, but did not go through the same banking collapse. rather, the crisis in public finances has been a result of the general weakness of greek capitalism and the greek state. its exit strategy, therefore, has been a more proto-typical neoliberal stabilization programme. for example, pay for public sector workers is to be cut by 7 percent and frozen for the next five years; the value-added tax increased from 21 to 23 percent; contract/temporary workers in the public sector are to be terminated; the retirement age is to be raised; pensions will be based on lifetime earnings which will result in a 45 to 60 percent cut; and everything from water companies, railways and airlines are being discussed for privatization. this has, in turn, generated mass class conflict with five general strikes already launched by august 2010. with the social democratic pasok party in power, greece has been a case of ‘social liberal’ austerity. in contrast to these two cases, the us has had a massive financial crisis after years of credit-aided economic expansion as the world’s dominant economic power and issuer of the key reserve currency. as the world market’s ‘consumer of last resort’, the us government has played a key role in coordinating the rescue strategies of the financial system and of the stimulus measures. indeed, its global responsibilities for managing the world capitalist system has made the obama administration the most reluctant of the core states to turn to austerity. instead, austerity has been displaced to the state level. thirty-three states, for instance, are facing budget 15 shortfalls of 20 percent or more in 2010-11. since the summer of 2008, 231,000 state and local government jobs have been lost. all states combined are running a deficit of 30.2 percent of total budgetary requirements. to deal with this public services are being cut: states have reduced health benefits for low-income earners; 25 states are in the process of cutting support to primary and secondary education; 34 states are cutting support to state colleges and universities; 26 states have implemented hiring freezes; 13 states have laid off workers; and 22 states have cut public sector wages and salaries. in california alone the governor has proposed cuts that will result in the loss of 331,000 jobs. but across the us only sporadic protests have erupted, with public sector coalition fightbacks forming, but soon faltering. indeed, political space in the us is increasingly being taken up by the political right, most visibly seen in the emergence of the ‘tea party’ movement within the republican party. the us is a case where a defeated and traumatized working class is facing another period of punitive austerity in an effort to revitalize the american capitalist class and the delusions of the american dream. canada: from fiscal orthodoxy to ‘rescue’ and back canada has neither had the severe financial crisis of ireland, the uk and the us, nor the long-term competitiveness and financial problems of greece or other countries in the european periphery. canada’s monopolistic financial sector has been protected by its market structure, the underwriting of high-risk mortgages by the state, and the support given by the bank of canada to the financial sector to maintain profit margins. there has been, moreover, a long-term pattern of fiscal austerity by the federal and provincial governments that dates back to the 1980s (doern 2009; mcbride 2005). systematic reviews of programme expenditures were established in the last years of the liberal pierre trudeau government, and given particular prominence in the nielson task force on programme review of the conservative brian mulroney government. these governments began the neoliberal restructuring of the canadian state, in terms of programme administration and levels of support, shifting tax policies, and restraining expenditures and the deficit. it was, however, the liberal government of jean chretien and finance minister paul martin that the deficit was reduced through a radical programme of cuts and a displacement of fiscal responsibilities through the inter-government system. the canadian fiscal ‘miracle’ was founded upon the destruction of 50-50 cost sharing programs created in the 1960s to support health care, social services, income maintenance and post-secondary education. this programme spending was off-loaded onto the provinces. they, in turn, restrained expenditures and, following the same logic of displacement, dumped as much as they could onto municipalities and cities. local governments in canada are now entering a second decade of a fiscal crisis, permanent austerity: the politics of the canadian exit strategy from fiscal stimulus 16 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research of cutbacks and astonishing levels of unmet infrastructure spending. a canadian strategy of punitive austerity for public sector workers and services, coupled with the inter-governmental displacement of obligations, established a pattern of federal and provincial government surpluses. in coming to power in 2006, the hard right government of stephen harper had only to build on this financial legacy. it shaped, as will be shown, both the ‘rescue’ and ‘exit’ strategies to the financial crisis of the canadian state. the 2008 fiscal update: fiscal orthodoxy rarely does fiscal policy become the source of high drama, but that is exactly what unfolded at the national level of the canadian state over an 8 week period spanning 27 november 2008 to 27 january 2009. within that short timeframe, the harper government’s fiscal policy lurched from an uncompromising commitment to balanced budget orthodoxy to keynesian style emergency stimulus. the two forces behind the fiscal re-tacking were the severity of the economic crisis and washington’s call for a coordinated global stimulus package led by the g20, and the possibility that a vote of non-confidence would see the minority conservative government replaced in government by a coalition of liberals and new democratic party (ndp) backed by the bloc quebecois (bq). on 27 november 2008, finance minister jim flaherty delivered the annual economic and fiscal statement, essentially an update of the previous budget. in his address to parliament flaherty acknowledged that this was a dire time of “unprecedented deterioration in economic and financial systems around the world” and that such “difficult times” would require “difficult choices” (department of finance 2008). while governments around the globe embarked upon unprecedented public spending programs to contain the damage to their imploding economies and financial systems, canada’s conservative government announced that their antirecession plan was to keep the budget balanced. they did cede, however, that they would re-assess the situation in the weeks ahead (department of finance 2008). alongside flaherty’s out-of-step budget orthodoxy, the minister proceeded to lay down a series of political attacks that would, on the one hand, challenge the fundraising capacity of the opposition parties to exist and, on the other, intensify the assault on federal public service unions. prefacing his first bombshell by saying that tax dollars should not be “spent frivolously”, he announced that the $1.95 per vote subsidy parties received would be terminated. this would deprive the political parties of a major source of income. based on the votes received for each party in the 2008 election this would result in a loss for the liberals of $7.7 million, for the ndp $4.9 million, and $2.6 million for the bq (cbc 26 november 2008). second, he announced that legislation would be presented suspending the right to strike for federal public servants for 2010-11, 17 and that the wages of public service workers would be constrained for four years at 2.3 per cent in the first year and 1.5 per cent for the subsequent three years. third, in an effort to undermine the success of pay equity complaints filed against the federal government and adjudicated by the canadian human rights commission, flaherty announced that legislation would be introduced to terminate adjudication by the canadian human rights commission. instead, they would require that pay equity be dealt with only through the collective bargaining process – a process that could itself be uprooted at any time as he had just demonstrated (department of finance 2008). in the midst of an exploding financial crisis, the conservative government appeared adamant that they would rather cut spending than engage in the type of massive stimulus spending programs that the us and others were embarking upon. instead, their focus was on taking advantage of a liberal party in disarray and attempting to bankrupt the opposition parties. the opposition response was rapid. ndp leader jack layton, responding to earlier rumours of what the update contained, had already asked former leader ed broadbent to call former liberal prime minister jean chretien to discuss how the two parties might coordinate a response (valpy 2009, 11). the liberals had also announced that they would be moving a non-confidence motion on 1 december, three days hence. harper’s operatives and mps were picking up news that the three opposition parties were rapidly moving toward some form of common front. harper moved to delay the confidence vote to 8 december and thus began a series of government retreats from what they had just announced. on 29 november, the government announced it was dropping its plan to eliminate the subsidy to political parties. the next day, 30 november, the government retreated from the strike ban and announced that it would table a budget on 27 january 2009 to respond to the economic crisis. the opposition parties pressed ahead saying that harper had revealed what his real agenda was and that he had to be stopped. on monday december 1st, the liberals, ndp and bq unveiled their accord that would see the liberals and ndp share cabinet seats with the support of the bq which would remain outside cabinet (valpy 2009: 11-13). the accord ensured that the coalition would command a majority in parliament until 30 june, 2011 (dion and layton 2008). harper immediately said he would seek a prorogation of parliament: on december 3rd in an address on national television harper poured vitriol on the coalition arguing that it was a fundamentally undemocratic maneuver that did not respect the choice canadians had made in the previous election. his government would “use every legal means at our disposal to protect our democracy, to protect our economy, and to protect canada” (national post 2008). the following day harper met with the permanent austerity: the politics of the canadian exit strategy from fiscal stimulus 18 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research governor-general, who granted his request for prorogation. the coalition was dead. the question now turned to whether the fiscal update was as well. budget 2009: emergency keynesianism a new speech from the throne was delivered on january 26 and signaled that the harper government was now going to set a more conciliatory tone and, quite remarkably given the remarks just a few months prior, a budgetary u-turn. the speech noted that “the government’s agenda and the priorities of parliament must adapt in response to the deepening crisis. old assumptions must be tested and old decisions must be rethought” (clark and galloway 26 january 2009). the finance minister’s conversion from the most dogmatic of balanced budget conservatives to a deficit spending ‘keynesian’ came the next day in the 2009 budget speech. at the core of “canada’s economic action plan” was an emergency fiscal stimulus built on a budgetary deficit of $34 billion and then $30 billion over two years. emergency stimulus measures were then to be terminated, with deficit spending steadily reduced. this included $12 billion for infrastructure projects (department of finance 27 january 2009: 4). in addition, other key budget measures included a $20 billion cut to personal income taxes, $50 billion to expand a government program to purchase mortgages from banks, and $13 billion in additional financing for several state-owned agencies concerned with insuring mortgages, export marketing and business loans (globe and mail 27 january 2009). with the possibility of a liberal-ndp coalition government all but gone, and with michael ignatieff, a reluctant supporter of the coalition accord, replacing stephan dion as leader, the liberals decided to support the budget if the conservatives agreed to an amendment that required the government to a regimen of three updates on the implementation of the budget. although the pettiest of symbols, ignatieff characterized it as “putting this government on probation” (cbc 28 january 2009). as for the prospects of the coalition, bq leader gilles duceppe summed up: “it’s dead. it’s over. it’s finished” (cbc 28 january 2009). budget 2010: back to austerity on march 4, 2010, jim flaherty tabled his fifth budget as harper’s finance minister. the fiscal plan presented in budget 2010 contrasts with the previous year’s reluctant ‘rescue’ budget. ‘canada’s economic action plan’ was born out of, on the one side, the efforts to coordinate emergency stimulus spending by the g20, and, on the other, the coalition accord challenging the political stability of the harper minority government. in contrast, budget 2010 assumed the corner has turned on the economic crisis and presents a plan for ‘exit’ from deficit financing and a return to balanced budget orthodoxy. moreover, a ‘crisis in public finance’ is now assessed as the foremost problem to be addressed. the conservatives are seizing an 19 opportunity to deepen the neoliberalization of the canadian state well beyond an exit strategy from the emergency fiscal keynesianism. budget 2010 proposes an aggressive plan to bring federal public finances back to balance, although the actual state of the canadian economy and public finances measures comparatively well against other large economies. for example, through the ‘great recession’ the canadian economy contracted less than the average of the core economies at 2.5 per cent in 2009, and is expected to grow at a faster clip for both 2010 and 2011 (imf 2010). in 2009-10, the combined federal and provincial deficits equaled -5.5 per cent of gdp. the federal deficit alone equals -3.1 per cent of total gdp. in historical perspective, this is modest given that during the mulroney era in the 1980s, the federal deficit stood between 5.6 and 5.8 per cent of gdp (td economics august 3 2010). in comparative perspective, the canadian position is rather modest given that deficit to gdp calculations for the us is -11.0 per cent, in the uk -11.3 per cent, and for the oecd as a whole -7.9 per cent. similarly, with respect to debt levels, canada falls toward the lower end of the spectrum with debt accounting for 28.6 per cent of gdp. this looks rather manageable compared with 56.4 per cent for the us, 46.9 per cent for the uk, and 50.2 per cent for germany (td economics august 3 2010, 4). while the recovery is widely regarded as fragile and uncertain, the harper government has with budget 2010 declared the great recession a historical relic. the priority now is an uncompromising five-year march to a near balanced budget in the fiscal year 2015-16. a range of constraint measures are to be deployed but without question a big part of achieving that target is the winding down of stimulus spending as of march 31, 2011. in addition to the termination of this spending, the budget plans to cap international assistance spending at 2010 levels, reduce defense spending by $500 million in 2012 through to 2014 as the afghanistan mission shrinks, and a three year freeze on federal program spending that will see 11 thousand public service jobs disappear (conference board of canada 2010, 11). these measures are expected to contain growth in program spending to 2.2 per cent per year. to place this in comparative perspective what this means is that within a five year frame, the federal deficit as a percentage of gdp will shrink from -3.1 per cent in 2010-11 to -0.1 per cent (td economics 4 march 2010, 2). one bank forecast even projects a surplus of $1 billion in 2014-15, although there is also the caution that the scale of the cuts may slow economic growth in canada by 0.2 to 0.4 per cent (td economics 3 august 2010, 6). another forecast suggests that the government revenue forecasts are set low based on exceedingly low growth expectations. the result is that revenues to the government will be better than expected and by 2013 these may be as much as $6.3 billion higher than forecast. if this proves accupermanent austerity: the politics of the canadian exit strategy from fiscal stimulus 20 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research rate, a fiscal balance will be achieved a full year ahead of target (browarski, stewart, and derby 2010, 1; hodgson and stewart 29 july 2010). but even while a program for aggressively shrinking public expenditures was being presented, the finance minister boasted that canada’s federal tax-to-gdp ratio had dropped to its lowest level since 1961 (budget 2010, 10). this is astonishing given that 1961 precedes the advent of the important redistributive cost-sharing programs of the late 1960s that enabled an expansion in public health care, postsecondary education, social assistance and a myriad of other services and programs. there is clearly the fiscal space in canada to increase spending and taxation by at least two per cent of gdp to bring canada’s spending up to the level it was during a period marked by the most progressive innovations in redistributive policy in this country’s history (yalnizyan, 22 march 2010). in short, the response presented in budget 2010 to canada’s federal public deficit and debt is an exaggeration. however, other policies sprinkled throughout the budget suggest that this exit is about more than public finances. budget 2010 includes a massive deregulation program, corporate tax cuts, and a further liberalization of foreign investment. with respect to cuts to corporate income tax, the finance minister noted that by 2012 “canada will have the lowest statutory corporate income tax rate in the g7” (budget 2010, 10). the goal is to reduce the federal general corporate tax rate to 15 per cent and to move toward a combined federal and provincial corporate tax rate of 25 per cent by 2012. to place this in perspective, in 2000 the federal corporate tax rate was 28 per cent and the combined federal and provincial corporate tax rates were 43.6 per cent. within a 12 year span, taxes on corporations operating in canada will have been nearly halved by a succession of liberal and conservative governments (budget 2010, 47; department of finance 2003). the deregulatory dimension of the budget received scant attention despite the fact that these proposals seriously erode environment protection and open the door wide for mining and hydro carbon exploration in the fragile eco-systems of the arctic. the budget proposes a ‘red tape reduction commission’ involving both conservative members of parliament and ‘private sector representatives’, to review and eliminate federal regulations that are seen to impede investment and development. this mimics the red tape commission set up by the harris government in ontario in 1995 but goes even further. business interests who had been subject to regulation can now advocate from within the canadian state to terminate or change regulations to which their industries are subjected. in the absurdly named objective of ‘green jobs and growth’, environmental regulations that have served to at least assess and shape investment and development projects are undermined. indian and northern affairs have been directed to ‘accelerate’ the process of reviewing resource extraction projects in the arctic so as to ‘remove barriers to private investment’. the 21 regulatory system is to be ‘modernized’ by transferring responsibility for conducting environmental assessments of large energy projects from the canadian environmental assessment agency to the much more producer and investment friendly national energy board. and budget 2010 furthers foreign investment liberalization by removing restrictions on foreign ownership in canada’s satellite sector (budget 2010, 93-102). while the heavy hand of state regulation over the environment and economy is lightened, the canadian security and intelligence service will see its budget grow by $28 million (budget 2010, 127). the harper government’s 2010 budget is leading an aggressive attack on the fiscal deficit engendered by the economic crisis and the bailouts of the financial system. in many ways canada is at the forefront of the central capitalist states in undermining public services as it has been since the chretien-martin budgets of the mid-1990s. the punitive austerity they imposed has been sustained across the last decade and the harper government. the ‘fiscal crisis’ that has been sparked by the panic rush to exit strategies from the emergency fiscal stimulus is being used as a further opportunity to intensify the neoliberal restructuring of the regulatory and redistributive remnants of the welfare state. it would not be too far off to describe the evolution of canadian fiscal strategy as a turn to permanent austerity, particularly when the constraints on provincial budgetary policies are also considered. the provincial exits to austerity while the federal government is attempting to move methodically toward balance within five years, the budgetary position of the canadian provinces is much more uneven. in fiscal year 2009, the ten provinces collectively ran the largest provincial deficit in history at $48.2 billion. this equals 3.2 per cent of provincial gdp. it is expected that a combination of improving economic conditions and the conclusion of provincial stimulus programs will help the provinces reduce this deficit to $34 billion in 2011 (conference board of canada 2010). but beyond that, how some of the provinces, especially ontario and quebec, exit fiscal deficit without a radical reconsideration of how revenues are raised or public services are delivered is difficult to imagine. the provinces diverge widely in their exit planning both in time frame and policy measures. whether social democratic or conservative, they all share a fidelity to ensuring the cost of the crisis is borne by workers via tax shifting, declining levels and quality of public services and regressive user fees. for example, various new and higher consumption taxes have been introduced in nova scotia, quebec, manitoba and saskatchewan. quebec has further added new user fees and introduced a health ‘premium’. all provinces have presented budgets that aim to keep program expenditure growth at or below 2 per cent per year; have cut or frozen operational budgets permanent austerity: the politics of the canadian exit strategy from fiscal stimulus 22 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research and introduced constraints on public sector compensation and the number of staff working in the core public services. only nova scotia has introduced a tax on high income earners and only manitoba has indefinitely postponed a planned 1 point cut in the corporate income tax rate (td economics 3 august 2010, 7). of all the provinces, ontario’s budget position is the most politically and fiscally complicated. ontario’s ‘third-way’ liberals have reinvested in public services since arriving in government in 2003 after defeating a conservative party led largely by mike harris. however, they have also been committed to some of the key principles of the common sense revolution—regressive taxation, a fidelity to balanced budgets, and an ongoing erosion of social assistance benefits. the finance minister, dwight duncan, signaled a new era of austerity in his 2010 budget. first, the public sector compensation restraint to protect public services act was tabled and which froze the salaries and wages of 350,000 non-union public sector workers until march 31 2012. the second signal delivered was that the liberal government would ask the unions representing 700,000 broader public sector workers to accept a minimum 2 year wage freeze. such an agreement would yield an estimated $750 million per year in savings (ontario ministry of finance 2010). third, ontario will continue with its ongoing plan to cut corporate taxes. this will cost the province $1.2 billion in each of the next three years resulting in an accumulative loss of $3.6 billion (nupge 31 march 2010). fourth, the budget contemplates a massive privatization of public assets including the liquor control board that regulates the sale of alcohol, the ontario lottery and gaming commission, public electricity producers and distributors among others as a means to generate a large amount of revenue. (however, the political focus appears to be on public sector wage cuts, with the privatization measures being delayed or shunted to the side.) as a whole, ontario’s 2010 budget forecasts 7 years of austerity with a plan that extends to 2017-18 when a zero-deficit is achieved. this will result in a shrinking of ontario’s public economy from a current 19.2 per cent of gdp to 15.5 per cent in 2017-18 (td economics 25 march 2010, 1). this translates as a nearly 20 per cent contraction of ontario’s public sector, leaving it at a size that corresponds to that of the period of the common sense revolution. if the ontario budget was the most complex of the provincial budgets in the hardest hit economy from the financial crisis, the most draconian budget of all the 2010 provincial budgets was delivered by the liberal government of quebec on 30 march 2010. the more regressive measures include a health care user-fee that applies to all citizens 18 years of age and older. this user fee will reach $200/year in 2012; a $25 fee per visit with a medical doctor; a 17 per cent increase in electricity costs by 2018; a 2 per cent increase in the sales tax; the core public service is subject 23 to a pay freeze until 2014; an ongoing shrinking of the number of public sector workers by allowing only one replacement hire for every two retirements/departures; a review of all government programs; and the closure or amalgamation of 30 public agencies (quebec ministry of finance march 30 2010, press release #1). it needs noting that the measures directed at public sector workers is in addition to the charest government’s draconian law c-43 passed in 2005. the legislation imposed a two-year wage freeze and restricted wage increases thereafter to 2 per cent. moreover, the bill introduced anti-strike provision ensuring there would be no union resistance and backed this up with punitive provisions including a $500 fine for any worker defying the legislation in addition to a penalty for striking of two days pay for every day on strike. the combined effect of five years of frozen wages followed by increases falling below the rate of inflation resulted in a decline in real incomes for public sector workers of 4 per cent (mandel 2010). resisting austerity, defending public services the turn to austerity in the core capitalist states has generated general strikes, disruption of public service delivery and sustained protests. these will continue over the coming year as the cuts are only starting and the impacts of austerity more severe and inequitable through time. in all cases, the cuts are revitalizing anti-neoliberal movements, and leading to new attempts to forge coalitions between public sector workers and users. the form of these alliances, however, varies greatly: from the general strikes and fusion with an emerging socialist politics in the european periphery; to the contradiction between the community based anti-cuts alliances and the peak-union ‘partnership’ with the government in ireland; to the surging then sputtering fightback campaigns at the state and local levels in the us under the shadow of an ascending hard right. after a number of previous coalitions against neoliberalism—in the struggles against nafta, the ontario days of action, the public sector common fronts in b.c. and quebec, the militant walkouts by nurses in alberta and other provinces— the union movement in canada has retreated into a defensive posture and the social movements are in a sustained phase of disorganization and political uncertainty. the exit strategy of ‘permanent austerity’ emerging out of the canadian state and capitalist classes provides a direct challenge to the left in canada at a moment of historical weakness. the federal ‘exit’ budget, for example, was met with criticism from the canadian labour congress, the council of canadians, among others. they argued that it laid out a program for eroding public services, economic sovereignty, and environmental protections, as well as its targeting public sector wages and work. but there is little evidence of strategy for resisting the cuts, or of a broader permanent austerity: the politics of the canadian exit strategy from fiscal stimulus 24 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research campaign of resistance through grass-roots mobilization of union members, social movements and users of public services. there is little beyond the ad hoc negotiating fronts of public sector unions and the sectoral campaigns around specific policy issues—climate change, healthcare, erosion of public broadcasting, and so forth. this is in part explained by canada’s decentralized federalism with the provinces delivering public goods, such as health, education and social services, which are a key terrain for struggles over cuts. in quebec, for instance, there has been a measure of political mobilization in defence of public services and workers’ rights. after five years of legislated wage restraint, quebec’s public sector workers formed a common front—composed of the confederation of national trade unions, the quebec federation of labour, and the inter-union secretariat of public services, and representing 475,000 workers—in anticipation of law 43’s expiration in march 2010 and an austerity budget being delivered to the national assembly. the front’s main demand was for an 11.25 per cent wage increase over a three year period. but the common front refused to join forces with the broad-based coalition against user fees and privatization that emerged in response to the 2010 budget. instead, the unions signed a five year ‘accord’ with the government that falls far short of restoring public sector wages and working conditions. the five year agreement will provide a 7 per cent increase or 10.5 per cent if there is better than expected economic growth. given inflation, quebec’s public sector workers are facing a further five years of declining income (mandel 2010). the quebec case bears parallels to the irish unions negotiating to preserve the illusions of ‘partnership’ with the state at the expense of austerity. in ontario, the momentum for a similar union accommodation, in this case without any union mobilization at all, may well prove unavoidable. since 2003, the ontario liberals have built something of the old ‘lib-lab’ alliance with several key unions that has filled the electoral vacuum left by much of labour abandoning the ndp after imposing a ‘social contract’ under the rae government in the 1990s. the ontario government has been holding preliminary talks on restraint with a wide number of unions with public employees. to date, most unions have walked away from the talks, and voiced opposition to the wage restraint. but it is not so clear that the unions will mobilize opposition to the wage restraint or the cuts to government services, and build toward the strikes that will be necessary to break the budgetary proposals to have workers and the poor pay for the crisis. it would be foolish to rule out a deal emerging between a number of unions and the mcguinty government and further consolidation of a ‘lib-lab’ alliance under the fear that a conservative government would be even worse. it is completely delusional that such ‘there is no alternative’ politics challenges austerity or builds an anti-neoliberal political bloc. 25 there is, however, a number of campaigns in ontario—notably, against welfare cuts to the special diet and for disabilities support, indigenous peoples struggles around mining, demands for improved public transit, ecology fights about commodification of water and the boreal forest—that are illustrative of the anti-austerity politics forming in specific sectors. these need to deepen their struggles over specific state apparatuses and bases of support in local communities and develop the organizational linkages of a province-wide anti-neoliberal front. the ontario health coalition (ohc) includes nurses, unions, progressive doctors, and a vast array of community organizations, and is part of the canada health coalition network; it is a good example of the potential to build an alternate political campaign to defend public services. in response to ontario’s 2010 budget, for example, the ohc rejected the 1.5 per cent increase in hospital funding that budget provided. the ohc concluded that this created a “gap between hospital funding and inflation for the third year in a row” (ohc 25 march 2010). the ohc has also effectively opposed the ontario government’s policy of incremental privatization of health care institutions and delivery. examples include the ohcs opposition to the marketization of home care where a steady increase in for-profit contracting has been observed and the government’s policy of public-private partnerships (p3s) in the hospital sector. p3 hospital projects have been characterized by public healthcare advocates as ‘pay more, get less’ projects that fatten private profits at public expense. an analysis of four ontario p3 hospital projects in sarnia, ottawa, brampton and north bay found that they were posting budget overruns of 75 per cent. they were costing not the planned $1.2 billion but rather $2.1 billion, and delivered less bed capacity than had been planned as well (canadian health coalition march 2009). these campaigns have built up impressive community alliances between public sector healthcare workers, local health policy activists and the wider union and progressive movements in defence of public healthcare. the campaigns to defend public hospitals and healthcare offer an example of popular resistance, and the potential to expand this mobilization to other parts of the public sector such as waste management, transit, and energy production. opposition to workers bearing the cost of the crisis and defence of public expenditure is the beginning case to be made. this will require linking public sector ‘producers’ with ‘users’ of public services. the quality of these services is directly connected to public sector workers. and there is any number of areas where the quality of public goods and spaces—parks, welfare provision, public transit—needs democratization and expansion. however, it is increasingly clear that the ‘exits’ from the emergency keynesian measures introduced at the height of the crisis are intensifying the market and class disciplines of neoliberalism. this does not mean less state, or even permanent austerity: the politics of the canadian exit strategy from fiscal stimulus 26 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research less regulation, but a particular form of state and regulatory policies that enhance capitalist class power. the political opposition to the austerity exits need to account for the class nature of neoliberalism in building new organizational capacities for resistance. the lines of social division and political conflicts forming at this phase of the crisis suggest that these will be struggles, in the first instance, against and within the neoliberal state and the politics in canada of permanent austerity. references bank of canada, july 2009, monetary policy report, available at www.bankofcanada.ca/en/mpr/. baragar, fletcher, 2009, “canada and the crisis,” in julie guard and wayne antony, eds., bankruptcies and bailouts, halifax: fernwood. bloomberg, july 20, 2009, “u.s. rescue may reach $23.7 trillion, barofsky says”, at http://www. bloomberg.com/. browarski, sabrina, matthew stewart and paul derby, 2010, budget report 2010: the long road to fiscal balance, conference board of canada, available at http://www.conferenceboard.ca/topics/economics/budgets/fed_2010_budget.aspx. canadian health coalition, 2009, “p3s = private profits, public pays”, available at http://medicare. ca/main/the-facts/p3s-private-profits-public-pays. cbc, 28 january 2009, “ignatieff puts tories ‘on probation’ with budget demand”, available at http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2009/01/28/ignatieff-decision.html. conference board of canada, summer 2010, canadian outlook, available at http://www.conferenceboard.ca/temp/9e6cbdc6-81e8-4a33-b0c1-c33bf33dc455/11-022_co-summer10-otlk_ web.pdf clark, campbell and gloria galloway, 26 january 2009, “harper’s words carry softer tone”, globe and mail. crotty, james, 2009, “structural causes of the global financial crisis,” cambridge journal of economics, 33. department of finance, 27 november 2008, the economic and fiscal statement 2008, available at http://www.fin.gc.ca/ec2008/speech-eng.html. department of finance, 4 march 2010, budget 2010: leading the way on jobs and growth available at http://www.budget.gc.ca/2010/pdf/speech-eng.pdf . department of finance, august 2003, federal corporate tax rate reductions, available at http:// www.fin.gc.ca/toc/2003/taxratered_-eng.asp. 27 dion, stephane and jack layton, 1 december 2008, an accord on a cooperative government to address the present economic crisis, available at http://www.liberal.ca/pdf/docs/081201_accord_en_signed.pdf. doern, bruce, 2009, “evolving budgetary policies and experiments,” in alan maslove, ed., how ottawa spends, 2009-2010: economic upheaval and political dysfunction, montreal: mcgillqueen’s university press. financial times, 13 september 2010, “basel deal reached on banks’ reserves.” government of canada, 3 march 2010, speech from the throne, a stronger canada. a stronger economy. now and for the future, available at http://www.speech.gc.ca/grfx/docs/sft-ddt-2010_e. pdf. globe and mail, 27 january 2009, “tax relief and major spending projects: a plan for troubled times”, available at http://v1.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/rtgam.20090127.wbudget_highlights0127/bnstory/budget2009/home. hodgson, glen and matthew stewart, 2010, canadian feds ahead of plan on fiscal rebalancing, conference board of canada, available at http://www.conferenceboard.ca/economics/hot_ eco_topics/default/10-07-29/canadian_feds_ahead_of_plan_on_fiscal_rebalancing.aspx. ilo, 2009, world of work report 2009: the global jobs crisis and beyond, geneva: ilo. imf, may 2010, fiscal monitor: navigating the fiscal challenges ahead, washington: imf. imf, july 2010, world economic outlook, washington: imf. loxley, john, 2009, “financial dimensions: origins and state responses,” in julie guard and wayne antony, eds., bankruptcies and bailouts, halifax: fernwood. mackenzie, hugh and richard shillington, 2009, canada’s quiet bargain: the benefits of public spending, toronto: canadian centre for policy alternatives. mandel, david. july 25 2010, fighting austerity? the public sector and the common front in quebec, the bullet, n. 396, available at http://www.socialistproject.ca/bullet/396.php. mcbride, stephen, 2005, paradigm shift: globalization and the canadian state, halifax: fernwood. mckinsey global institute, october 2008, mapping global capital markets: fifth annual report, new york: mckinsey global institute. mcnish, jacquie and greg mcarthur, december 13 2008, “how high risk mortgages crept north,’ globe and mail. national post, 3 december 2008, “stephen harper’s dec. 3, 2008 statement”, available at http://www. nationalpost.com/news/politics/story.html?id=1028147. permanent austerity: the politics of the canadian exit strategy from fiscal stimulus 28 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research national union of public and general employees, 31 march 2010, “public sector workers paying for corporate tax cuts”, available at http://www.nupge.ca/content/public-sector-workers-paying-corporate-tax-cuts. office of management and budget, 2010, “the budget” at www.budget.gov. onaran, özlem, 2010, ‘fiscal crisis in europe or a crisis of distribution?’ soas, research on money and finance, discussion paper, no. 18. ontario health coalition, 25 march 2010, “ontario health coalition response to provincial budget”, available at http://www.marketwire.com/press-release/ontario-health-coalition-responseprovincial-budget-mcguinty-must-stop-over-top-crisis-1138192.htm. ontario health coalition, 20 january 2006, “say no to privatized hospitals!”, available at http:// www.web.net/ohc/p3s/p3updatejan06.pdf. ontario ministry of finance, 25 march 2010, open ontario: ontario’s plan for jobs and growth, available at http://www.fin.gov.on.ca/en/budget/ontariobudgets/2010/statement.pdf. panitch, leo, greg albo and vivek chibber, eds., 2010, the socialist register 2011: the crisis this time, london: merlin press. quebec ministry of finance, 30 march 2010, choices for the future press release # 1, available at http://www.budget.finances.gouv.qc.ca/budget/2010-2011/en/documents/ communique_1en.pdf. realtytrac, 2010, “us foreclosures market report,” at www.realtytrac.com. roubini, nouriel and stephen mihm, 2010, crisis economics, new york: penguin. stiglitz, george, 2010, freefall, new york: w.w. norton. td economics, 4 march 2010, the 2010 federal budget, available at www.td.com/economics/budgets/fed10.pdf. td economics, 25 march 2010, a long road back to balance, available at http://www.td.com/economics/budgets/on10.pdf. td economics, 30 april 2010, fiscal green shoots, available at http://www.td.com/economics/special/db0410_fiscal.pdf. td economics, 3 august 2010, special report: canada’s fiscal exit strategy, available at http://www. td.com/economics/special/pg0810_fiscal_exit.pdf. valpy, michael, 2009, the ‘crisis’: a narrative, in peter russell and lorne sossin eds., parliamentary democracy in crisis, toronto: university of toronto press. yalnizyan, armine, 22 march 2010, now is the wrong time for fiscal frugality, canadian centre for policy alternatives, available at http://www.policyalternatives.ca/publications/commentary/now-wrong-time-fiscal-frugality. 29 janus-faced austerity: strengthening the ‘competitive’ canadian state carlo fanelli & chris hurl1 abstract: the global economic crisis has triggered a wave of stimulus spending throughout the world, with particular concentrations in north america, the eurozone and china. this paper examines its canadian context. focusing broadly on the deepening integration of neoliberalism since the election of stephan harper in 2006 as well as federal conservative fiscal and monetary policy, this paper delves into the janus-faced character of canadian austerity measures. it is argued that while social services and spending are restricted for certain segments of the canadian working class, new arrangements and spending initiatives are rolled out by the federal government in order to fuel enhanced capital accumulation. this paper concludes with some propositions for resisting austerity and strengthening the resolve of the canadian working class. keywords: canada; austerity; fiscal & monetary policy; capitalpreserving federalism; neoliberalism. introduction the times are tough, we are told. the grim economic climate appears unmatched in severity since the great depression. it is on this basis that social spending is being slashed and wage freezes are imposed on public sector workers across the country and around the world. in order to save a sinking ship, workers are asked to throw wages, benefits and social security overboard. however, the thin veil of collective belt-tightening, the attitude that we must all share the burden, belies an enduring project of class polarization. hence, rather than viewing the current 1 carlo fanelli and chris hurl are phd candidates (abd) in the department of sociology & anthropology with a specialization in political economy. janus-faced austerity: strengthening the ‘competitive’ canadian state 30 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research responses to ‘economic’ crisis as somehow marking a break with neoliberalism, government stimulus policies reflect a profound continuity and further entrenchment of past strategies of privatization, creating openings for capital and public sector spending restraint. in this paper, we will argue that the current round of austerity measures advanced by the harper conservatives is janus-faced: on the one hand public services, social programs, labour and environmental supports and protections are being ‘rolled back’ for the working class, while state supports are ‘rolled out’ to serve the needs of capital. in so doing, harper is showing no hesitation to use the coercive power of the federal government to centralize policies and institutional arrangements that appease business interests. after briefly tracing the theoretical presuppositions of neoliberalism and the realignment of governance at intersecting scales of operation, we situate the continuing assault on public services and organized labour by drawing attention to what we refer to as capital-preserving federalism. as a political and economic strategy, capital-preserving federalism provides a means of imposing constraints upon newly elected federal governments and sub-national constituent-units’ (e.g. provinces, municipalities) ability to bypass market access to goods and services, in addition to restrictions upon withdrawing or opting-out of trade and investment agreements negotiated supra-nationally2. in other words, successive federal governments have firmly fixed the parameters of reform to meet the needs of capital accumulation3. while this dynamic is advanced on a federal level, it entails the enforcement of market-dependence through multi-scaler, multi-spatial and multi-temporal institutional and legal arrangements, as well as corresponding shifts in socio-cultural and political practices. this entails the marketization of public goods and services, the re-regulation of capital controls such as foreign direct investment (fdi), and the creation of new institutional arrangements under the auspices of ‘scarcity’ and ‘restraint’. what’s more, this entails a missionary faith in balanced budgets, fiscal discipline and monetary policy. 2 ‘capital-preserving’ federalism represents an effort on our part to develop a corrective to the concept of “market-preserving” federalism. while we cannot enter into a full analysis here, we base our critique on three main propositions. first, the notion of market-preserving federalism reifies the ‘market’ as if functioning by autonomous laws of supply and demand disembedded from broader social relations. second, this mystification serves to obscure fundamentally antagonistic class relations where the extraction of surplus-value takes place at the detriment of labour for the benefit of capital. third, in naturalizing social relations of capital, takes for granted the liberal dichotomization of the economic and political spheres of social life, while--incorrectly we might add—treating the state and market as competitors as opposed to mutually reinforcing. see, for example, weingast, 1995; yingyi & weingast, 1996; mckinnon, 1997). 3 while not employing the notion of capital-preserving federalism, anderson (2010) outlines similar processes at work. for instance, in 2000 brazil adopted a fiscal responsibility law that constrains both federal and state governments, with limits on spending for government employees, public debt, expenditures and short-term spending in election years. the federal government can withhold transfers to states when they do not comply and criminal proceedings can be brought against elected officials. similar examples include argentina, mexico, nigeria, russia, south africa and belgium for example. see anderson, 2010. 31 as we will attempt to show throughout, this is reflected in the federal government’s most recent stimulus policies. these policies impose restraint measures on the public sector while ceding fiscal control and authority over domestic policies away from local governments and communities toward political and economic elites. for this reason, the response to the current economic crisis entails the ‘rolling back’ of certain state activities, such as social programs and capital controls, and the ‘rolling out’ of new institutions and governmentalities that aim to stabilize neoliberal accumulation strategies (peck and tickell, 2002). while the federal government’s janus-faced strategy is significant, this by no means marks the beginning of a new era. as thomas workman (2009, p.7) has recently reminded: “these institutional constellations evolve very slowly over decades of class struggle.” in fact, the adoption of federal stimulus policies should be viewed in continuity with past neoliberal projects. the issue, then, in our view is what these multi-level arrangements and institutions do and on whose behalf? in other words, it’s a class question. in what follows, we argue that the federal conservative government has taken advantage of the current economic crisis and the regulatory, administrative and institutional powers of the state in order to facilitate planning, underwrite expansions, take on liabilities and contain class conflict. in other words, political and economic agents, via institutional arrangements and socio-cultural practices (i.e. “the market”), work through the state utilizing their positions of power to simultaneously cut services, while extending others to suit the valorization needs of capital. while we focus our analysis on the federal government, as this special forum in alternate routes suggests, this is a pattern being generalized across the country and around the world. theorizing neoliberalism: realigning governance to facilitate capital accumulation in the wake of the economic crisis of the mid-1970s, neoliberalism emerged as a response to the failure of the post-war keynesian welfare state to sustain capital accumulation. with the unprecedented profit rates of the 1950s and 60s faltering due to the rebuilding of western europe’s and japan’s productive capacities, increased competition from emergent economies in latin america and asia, rising militancy on the part of the working classes and especially trade unions, in addition to increasingly aggressive cold war geopolitics, a ruling class coup d’état was launched to reestablish higher rates of profit. with an adherence to neoclassical economics and classical liberalism, neoliberalism emerged in the 1970s as a comprehensive set of political and economic practices intent on reordering state administrations, creating new profit opportunities for businesses, imposing labour market discipline janus-faced austerity: strengthening the ‘competitive’ canadian state 32 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research and a prioritization of ‘finance’ capital over industrial or fixed capital4. a central aspect of this process has been the realignment of governance: unloading the costs of social services onto the individual and compelling diverse communities to compete with one another for ‘scarce’ resources under an institutional framework of private property, free markets and free trade, while continuing to slash taxes for the wealthy, marketizing all aspects of life, and selling off public assets at bargain basement prices. this entails a variety of cross-penetrating strategies that reconfigure the jurisdiction of markets across intersecting scales of governance, revamp institutional responsibilities and encourage socio-cultural changes around four central processes. first, neoliberalism presupposes the ongoing and active separation of people from the means of subsistence, cultivating dependency on market mechanisms in areas of life previously outside of the market. second, under neoliberalism, class solidarities are actively decomposed through the individuation of the labour process and service-provision, increasingly rendering individuals responsible for their own self-management and pitting them against one another for ‘scarce’ resources. third, neoliberalism cultivates short-term speculation, aspiring to transform every aspect of life into an investment opportunity. fourth, this entails the reconfiguration of the labour market away from a stable, skills-based labour force and toward temporary, contract-based labour arrangements that encourage competition between the private and public spheres. internationally, ‘globalization’ is the neoliberal face of a worldwide strategy that aims toward the creation of new zones of accumulation through increasingly authoritarian state apparatuses that seek to entrench market imperatives and reduce the power of labour (saad-filho & johnston, 2005). this includes: lowering and eliminating tariffs on imported goods, the removal of restrictions on foreign direct investment, domestic quotas and monopolies, an export-led growth strategy, the reregulation of domestic capital markets, as well as the weakening of environmental and labour laws, for example, which are seen as market impediments. this does not simply entail deregulation and dismantlement of the institutions of the keynesian welfare state. in fact, as peck and tickell (2002) note, there has been a shift from the ‘roll-back’ neoliberalism of the 1980s to an “emergent phase of 4 in our view, finance capital is not merely speculative or parasitic, nor the result of the stagnation tendencies of advanced capitalist economies. rather, what makes finance unique in its neoliberal form is its coalescing with industry, as well as leadership role. in other words, financial volatility actually becomes a developmental feature of neoliberalism that reinforces, rather than undermines the central position of finance-led neoliberalism and capitalist power structures. for instance, while finance may speculate in global money markets or bundle and repackage a host of derivative trading forms, a good many transactions are more often than not based on some form of real assets and commodity production. moreover, finance has been central to the disciplining of industry and the working class through the availability of credit and reinvestments in mortgages, pensions and loans. though neoliberalism was from its very beginning a project intent on restoring ruling class power, it went beyond this thoroughly integrating and subordinating the working classes into its dependent orbit. for a fuller exposition, see albo, gindin and panitch, 2010. 33 active state-building and regulatory reform” which they describe as “roll out” neoliberalism through the 1990s. while the crisis of the 1970s entailed wages freezes and dramatic austerity budgets, over the past twenty years governments have moved toward a more proactive position in unfolding new institutional frameworks that facilitate a deepening project of class polarization under the rubric of ‘scarcity’ and ‘restraint’. despite the political and ideological antagonism toward state ‘interference’ in the market, state intervention is central to securing the political, economic and social conditions necessary for accumulation such as the privatization of stateowned industries and utilities, the opening of its banking, healthcare, education and telecommunications systems to private ownership, in addition to competing international pensions and mutual funds. domestically, neoliberalism seeks to deepen and intensify internal competition among competing business interests, thereby pitting workers and workplaces in competition with one another through ever-increasing market compulsions. this includes efforts to contract-out and privatize provincial and municipal services, extract concessions from its unionized and non-unionized workforce, in addition to an increased reliance on public-private partnerships (p3’s). central banks are envisaged as inflation fighters, with an inflation control regime of between one and three percent. provincially, and as creatures of the provinces, municipally, neoliberal policies have sought to shift the burden of taxes from businesses to consumers for competitiveness, slash social services and liquidate assets. in order to become more ‘flexible’ and ‘leaner’ in a globalizing economy, provinces and cities have increasingly responded with attempts to move away from the universal provision of social services to marketized provisions with attached user-fees, enhanced inter-jurisdictional competition and sought a confrontational approach with unions, which have aimed to reorient accumulation strategies and to concentrate capital in metropolitan cores, which serve international markets (albo, 1994; kipfer & keil, 2002; tufts, 2004). the most recent emphasis on austerity and balanced budgets, however, is counteracted by growing state involvement in creating new spaces for accumulation. in confronting the growing indebtedness of the state, an all out offensive is launched against remaining social provisions and universal entitlements, thereby tipping the balance of class forces away from labour and toward creditors and locally dominant capitalist coalitions with alliances to the us ruling-class. in this manner, politicians, economists and policy-makers ensconced in the neoliberal doctrine were successful in moving the terrain of debate from the realm of production whereby labour and capital struggled over the control of the working-day and the appropriation of surplus-value, to the terrain of distribution and exchange thereby strengthening the alliance between capital and the state. janus-faced austerity: strengthening the ‘competitive’ canadian state 34 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research as the always global scope of capital accumulation and the persistent need for more domestic and local forms of ‘extra-market’ (i.e. legal, juridical, political, repressive) supports enmeshed, rather than ceding power away from the nation-state neoliberalism created new and shifting scales of governance each with an historically unique dynamism. this includes, for instance, the devolution of regulating responsibilities onto local governments without matching fiscal supports or a proportional transfer of power, while also scaling regulatory capacities ‘upwards’ to regional or international institutions (brenner, 2004). likewise, efforts to extend and consolidate neoliberalism have centered on attempts to: reduce the power of organized labour through market disciplining; the commodification and marketization of the state through measures that promote ‘competitive austerity’; reducing welfare disincentives to work; promoting the massive encouragement of part-time, precarious and contingent forms of service-sector employment; recklessly opening-up goods and capital markets to international competition; as well as disproportionately cutting taxes for higher-income earners and businesses, while moving-away from the social provision of universal programs to consumption-based levies (albo, 1993; clarke, 2005; brenner & theodore, 2002; mcbride, 2005). for organized labour this has meant the institutionalization of policies that aim to make it easier to decertify unions, unilaterally proclaim them “essential” and thereby removing the right to strike, as well as the increased use of coercive back-to-work legislation. all things considered, then, the capitalist classes have used the economic recession and the rhetoric of ‘fiscal consolidation’, ‘prudent business management’ and ‘government responsibility” as a strategic political opportunity to strengthen and expand processes of neoliberalism—from the urban to the international—through the state and market. under the guise of new public management mantras, there has been a retreat from the provision of social services through a stable, full-time labour force, increasingly toward part-time, seasonal and short-term contracts, which are seen as providing a more docile and globally competitive labour force (ilcan et al., 2003). likewise, through reduced social expenditures and long-term investments, all levels of government have sought to shed ‘liabilities’ through attrition, downsizing, leaving vacancies unfilled and retirements. by means of outsourcing, the government is increasingly advanced as a consumer that is responsible for purchasing services rather than actively producing them. this has served to weaken job security, seniority allowances, transfer and promotion opportunities, cost-of-living increases, erode pensions and benefits, in addition to increasing the absolute managerial control over the working-day. indeed, a renewed assault on the public-sector, and in particular unionized jobs (as we argue below), will likely come down hardest on racial35 ized groups and women since not only has this been where many have made the most gains but also because they are likely to see increases in the unpaid sphere of social life and reproduction. all things considered, we now turn to a discussion of the particular ways in which the election of prime minister stephan harper’s federal conservatives have acted to preserve the mobility and power of capital, while subordinating and intensifying pressures for the working-class. ‘constitutionalizing’ neoliberalism: integrating the ‘competitive’ logic of the state the current economic crisis has provided a calculated political and economic opportunity for the federal government to simultaneously ‘roll back’ its commitment to the provision of social services, while at the same time ‘rolling out’ institutions and social policies that are oriented towards the cultivation of new channels for accumulation. the measures advanced by the federal government are by no means based on austerity or restraint, but on expanding and deepening opportunities for capital valorization unburdened by the costs of social infrastructure. welfare state retrenchment and tight fiscal constraints go hand in hand with irresponsible tax cuts and spectacular mega projects. as the immediacy of the financial crisis recedes and governments around the world restrict spending, with the most dramatic conflicts over public goods and services occurring in europe, these so-called ‘exit strategies’ are attempting to re-establish liberalized financial systems and reconstruct the neoliberal policy framework and dominance of the market in regulating economic output and distribution. it is important, therefore, to begin by identifying some of the features of these so-called exit strategies being adopted by the harper government in canada, particularly with respect to fiscal policies, given that fiscal austerity is likely to be a flashpoint of political struggles in the coming period. from his very first budget speech in 2006, titled “restoring fiscal balance in canada”, harper demonstrated his hard-line commitment to constitutionalism in the conservatives proposal for a stricter separation of responsibilities by cutting federal social programs that would fall under the auspices of the provinces. almost immediately after coming to power, prime minister harper slashed the goods and services tax (gst) from 7 percent to 6 and later 5 percent in an attempt to attract investment and spur economic development. the conservatives devoted the canadian state to “competitive and efficient” economic policies and proposed plans to harmonize the tax system. meanwhile, they moved quickly to scrap plans for a non-profit, centre-based, affordable national child care program that had been negotiated by the liberals with the provinces and territories and replaced it with the universal child care benefit that saw families on janus-faced austerity: strengthening the ‘competitive’ canadian state 36 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research welfare, the working poor and modest-income families netting between $600 and $951 per annum; nowhere near close enough to cover the costs of childcare or to allow a parent to stay at home (batte et al, 2006; bezanson, 2010). a short time thereafter, the 2007 global financial meltdown plunged the international political economy into the most significant crisis of accumulation since the great depression. in an act of political brinkmanship, soon after fixing federal election dates to every four years prime minister harper called a snap election breaking his own election promise in the hope of gaining a clear majority. while this did not happen, the biggest losers in the election were the liberals who had lost twenty-six seats; two-thirds of which were redistributed to the conservatives and the remainder to the ndp. meanwhile, governments of all stripes the world over responded with unprecedented levels of stimulus funding. the harper conservatives, long a sanctuary for fiscal hawks, likewise responded with stimulus spending. the centerpiece of the 2009 budget, titled “canada’s economic action plan”, injected $64 billion over two years toward infrastructure spending, personal income tax cuts and the ‘securitization’ (or preemptive bailout) of state-backed mortgage and insurance agencies. harper’s government, which since late-2006 required all provinces to consider the p3 route as a condition for receiving federal infrastructure money and in 2007 created the aggressive public-private partnerships canada crown corporation, was using its fiscal leverage as a source of cost-sharing and the economic crisis as a pretext to promote p3 projects nationally (see loxley, 2010). this is in spite of the fact that a growing number of studies indicate that the privatization of formerly public services is often no more efficient or less costly than traditional approaches to service delivery (loxley, 2010; armstrong et al, 2001; mackenzie, 2004). despite exceptional amounts of stimulus spending, however, the harper government has remained steadfastly committed neoliberals. with the two year stimulus spending coming to an end and economic “recovery” allegedly underway, harper’s conservatives are looking to halve their deficits by 2013 under the euphemism of “fiscal consolidation”, otherwise known as austerity. with an estimated deficit of nearly $56 billion for 2010-11 that is expected to remain well into 2013-2014, and a forecast debt-to-gdp ratio of about 34-35 percent, this is nowhere near the 25 percent threshold when the books were balanced. however, the state of the federal budget is by no means dire, when taking into consideration the record $14 billion surplus that harper inherited from an earlier decade of liberal austerity. in addition, prior to the onset of the current crisis, canada’s debt at 32.3 percent of national gdp was at its lowest in more than a quarter century given the largest payments in canadian history and federal law that requires all surpluses to be used to pay down the national debt and not for new spending initiatives. 37 in an effort to rebalance the books, the most recent speech from the throne (march 3, 2010) suggests that, rather than depart from neoliberal austerity and monetary policy, harper’s conservatives are seeking to further expand and intensify them. in other words, a private-sector crisis is being shifted onto the public sector and the power of finance capital is emerging stronger than ever. in their blatantly ideological quest to return to balanced budgets, harper’s conservatives—no less aided by the federal liberals and new democratic party—have turned their attention toward an aggressive strategy premised on public sector austerity and private sector prosperity. for instance, hidden deep in the 2010 budget is a technical change to tax regulations that aim to entice fdi through the weakening of domestic constraints. the budget removes restrictions that foreign investors, especially venture capitalists and private-equity funds, face in selling shares in canadian firms. this change to section 116 of the income tax act effectively eliminates the need for tax reporting to the canada revenue agency (cra). previously, the cra required investors to disclose details of the sale for approval in the case that taxes needed to be paid. as a result, rather than repatriate any capital gains, investors kept the proceeds of the sale in canadian accounts for fear of taxation. as of the speech, these restrictions have been for the most part eliminated (viera, 2010). touting the alleged benefits of the change, finance minister flaherty recently remarked, “[t]he best way to build a more competitive economy is to create an environment that allows the entrepreneurs who employ so many canadians to succeed and expand—not an environment that stands in the way of their success with high taxes and red tape” (department of finance, 2010). of course, flaherty failed to mention that these changes are expected to cost ottawa $130-million in lost revenue over five-years. meanwhile, in all areas but defense spending which has increased 37% since 2000-2001, government operating expenditures have been frozen for two-years, which given inflation means real cuts. the conservatives have recently pledged $9 billion to build jails for criminals who do not exist, spent $1.1 billion on turning toronto into a militarized city for the recent g8/g20 meetings and promised another $16 billion for f-35 fighter jets for fighting ‘terrorism’ abroad. finance minister jim flaherty has also suggested that there are some opportunities for the privatization of crown assets, including real estate and the outsourcing of public contracts. in particular, the conservatives are taking aim at atomic energy canada ltd., seeking to open-up canada posts’ procurement of overseas mail, and grant the minister of the environment unilateral powers to waive environmental assessments. in seeking to create new clusters of accumulation, environmental regulations in the arctic have been ‘streamlined’ for oil and mining companies to drill, while federal environmental assessment reports have been removed from the purview of the canadian environmental agency to the busijanus-faced austerity: strengthening the ‘competitive’ canadian state 38 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research ness-friendly national energy board. this continues the removal of environmental initiatives by the conservatives made most explicit by harper’s dismissal of the kyoto protocol as a “socialist scheme” designed to suck money from the rich countries. the weakening of social provisions, labour and environmental laws has been paralleled by new spending as harper has further concentrated federal stimulus monies in the energy, resource and construction industries. certainly new public spending is gravely needed given canada’s crumbling infrastructure (estimated at over $123 billion) and the fact that total public investment as a percentage of gdp has fallen from between two and three percent in the 1960s and 70s to about 0.5 percent by the 1990s (mackenzie, 2004); however this spending has not been equally distributed among the various segments of the canadian labour market, nor racial and gender neutral (ontario health coaltion, 2008; armstong et al, 2001; opseu, 2007). attacks against the poor, refugee claimants, temporary workers, live-in caregivers, and non-status persons are increasing as the blatant power of the federal state is summoned to service capital, while abandoning any responsibilities to labour (thomas, 2010; hussan and scott, 2009; teelucksingh & galabuzzi, 2005; galabuzzi, 2006; paz, 2008). indeed, recent research by kathleen lahey (2009) suggests that women have received only about 7 percent to 22 percent of stimulus funding, since men tend to predominate in the construction, mining and forestry industries. the bulwark of stimulus spending has been untargeted without any long-term planning, community involvement or proactive infrastructural spending, going mainly toward existing backlogs as opposed to rethinking development and the spatial development of where we live and work. the federal conservatives have continued to ‘slash and burn’ funding for equity seeking groups such as the status of women, or groups critical of israeli state policies such as kairos, and have in the process punished those that dare to criticize their policies. for example, a short-list of recent harper controversies includes what have (arguably) been labeled ‘politically-motivated’ removals such as the dismissal of openly critical and outspoken veterans ombudsman pat strogran, chief superintendent marty cheliak a strong supporter of the long-gun registry, former president of the canadian nuclear safety commission linda keen who shut down the chalk river nuclear facility over safety concerns, chair of the military complaints commission peter tinsley who was investigating the controversial transfer of afghan detainees and, most recently, chief statistician at statistics canada munir sheikh who resigned after the mandatory long-form census was scrapped in favour of a voluntary survey, which has been harshly criticized by a plethora of academics, think tanks, politicians, community groups and other levels of government. in addition, this includes last year’s prorogation (the fourth time in three years) of parliament for more than two months amid speculation of a coalition liberal-ndp, the helena guergis 39 affair, the dismissal of the arts and cultural community, alleged spending favouritism for conservative ridings, a foreign aid policy that denies funding for abortion services, a bold-faced 802 page omnibus or “dumpster” bill bulging with disparate issues, and public attacks targeting employment equity and affirmative action for federal employees. put into perspective, then, this can be understood as none other than an act of capitalist militancy on behalf of and in accordance with the state. a renewed round of austerity under the banner of “fiscal prudence” has led new president of the treasury board, the main cabinet committee responsible for the administration and operations of the federal civil service, stockwell day, to suggest that public-sector unions need to ‘share the pain’. this was a thinly veiled reference to the concessions extracted by private-sector unions from gm, ford, chrysler and vale-inco, for example, as well as the political failures and public resentment of striking public-sector workers from toronto and ottawa to windsor and vancouver (rosenfeld, 2009; albo et al, 2010; fanelli and paulson, 2009). stimulus and restraint go hand-in-hand: capital-preserving tax cuts cause deficits that then need to be resolved, which translates into social cuts and wage restraint for the working-class and a vicious circle of more tax cuts to spur business investment further eroding the fiscal base. for instance, over the next five years federal workers will subsidize corporate tax-cuts by $6.8-billion in transfers extracted through wage-freezes and job cuts, which will total nearly $21-billion. oddly, though, a great percentage of canadian federal tax-cuts will flow directly right back into the us treasury, which taxes its companies the difference between foreign taxes and domestic ones in order to stimulate internal production and slow outsourcing (weir, 2009). the recently negotiated “buy american” deal gives permanent and unrestricted foreign access to publicly funded contracts. this is an historical deed as it is the first time canadian governments have agreed to open procurement contracts to bids by other world trade organization members since the 1988 free trade agreement. this is particularly confusing as only about 2 percent of us federal stimulus funding, that is, about $4-5-billion of $275-billion, remains. still worse, canada and the european union are in trade negotiations to enact what the trade justice network, an alliance comprised of labour and social justice groups, has argued would be the largest, most intrusive free trade deal that canada has ever entered into and is progressing quite quickly with little public scrutiny (trade justice network). according to a recent study by scott sinclair (2010, p.3) of the canadian centre for policy alternatives (ccpa): the ceta [comprehensive economic and trade agreement] also will have an adverse impact on public services, especially those provided by local, territorial and provincial governments. the agreement would promote and entrench new forms of commercialization, janus-faced austerity: strengthening the ‘competitive’ canadian state 40 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research especially pub lic-private partnerships. it would also prohibit governments from setting performance require ments that oblige foreign investors or service pro viders to purchase locally, transfer technology or train local workers. the combined impact of its investment, services and procurement rules would make it far more difficult to reverse failed privatizations. the austerity agenda of the federal government has entailed the drastic reconfiguration of public services as canada is essentially offering to make commitments at the federal, provincial and municipal tiers that go beyond nafta and the wto, opening up services and investments, domestic regulation and standards, public procurement contracts and intellectual property rights (mcbride, 2005; johnson and mahon, 2005). foreign multinationals could potentially gain unprecedented access to municipal water services, while the demand for local offsets, the most important leverage that towns and cities have, such as local purchasing of goods and services or labour reinvestments, may no longer be permitted. in seeking to ‘constitutionalize’ neoliberalism, canada is pushing to include a nafta-like investor-state dispute mechanism that would allow european companies to sue any tier of government should they enact policies that cut into profits. in effect this could nullify and void, for example, fair wage policies and ethical strategies enacted by some provinces and cities, in addition to ceding authority and control over domestic policies away from local governments and communities to business elites whose profit interests trump all others. the ceta, in particular, takes aim at ontario’s green energy act, which offers grants and exemptions for cleaner energy sources and local job creation. toronto’s “buy local” food policy which has committed to increasing the amount of locally procured food served at city owned facilities and the celebrated ‘living wage’ in new westminster, for instance, could be prohibited. for months ahead of the g8/g20 meetings in toronto, the federal government had been lobbying world leaders to block proposals for a global bank tax for g20 members to be used as a slush fund for expected future bailouts and to prevent banks from shifting to jurisdictions with lower taxes. in an effort to convince g20 member states otherwise, harper touted the stability of the canadian banks, which he misleadingly promoted as not requiring a bailout similar in kind to those in the u.s. and european union. this praise however is both unjustified and dubious, when in fact canadian banks received upwards of $200 billion—that is more than the initial $700 billion bailout in the u.s. as a percentage of gdp—not to mention a host of additional accounting trickery that kept the ‘real’ costs of the bank bailouts out of the books (dobbin, 2010; stanford, 2010; campbell, 2009). in fact, stephan harper has recently gone as far as to say this would “punish” and be 41 “unfair” to canadian banks that, in the midst of the crisis in 2007, racked in nearly $20 billion in profits, and which have since had a field day buying up insolvent american banks. successful with their propaganda, the conservatives managed to persuade g20 leaders to forego a bank tax and, instead, convinced them to commit to a unified push for austerity pledging to halve their deficits by 2013. in canada, the potential class-based consequences are clear. with tens of thousands of baby-boomers expected to retire in the next decade, dwindling revenues and rising social services costs are expected to compound the budget fiasco. considering the twin perils of a falling birth rate and increasing retirements, parliamentary budget officer kevin page has warned that a shrinking tax-base coupled with increasing usage of health care and service benefits will lead to higher government costs and therefore an uncertain fiscal future (campion-smith, 2010). the changing demographics of the canadian labour market is expected to increase by 7 percent the number of retired people compared to those still in the workforce in the next ten years: that’s nearly as much as it grew in the last forty years. wait another ten years and the estimated cost to rectify this dilemma rises from $20 billion to $30 billion as nearly 40 percent of federal service workers are expected to retire in the next five years. in response, page has argued that permanent fiscal actions are needed either through significant tax-hikes, serious cuts in social spending, or some combination of both. unfortunately though, while understanding and analyzing the changing demographics of the canadian labour market is crucial, such uncertainty often invokes alarmist exclamations on the need to shrink the public sector and shed ‘liabilities’ (such as that which is currently happening throughout the eurozone, especially around health care and pension reform). true to form and typifying the inherent short-sightedness of neoliberal ideologues, finance minister flaherty’s spokesperson, crisholm potheier, called page’s warnings an “academic exercise” before dismissing it by replying that “canadians expect the government to focus on today’s fragile economic recovery”. despite harper’s dutiful allegiance to capital-preserving federalism, however, the conservatives continue to remain under pressure from business interests and corporate lobbyists, such as canadian federation of independent businesses president catherine swift, to withdraw health benefits and pension supports. in a letter to the federal pension review panel, swift stressed the need to do something about the “large and growing disunity between the pension benefits of private and public employees” stressing that the public sector should follow the lead of the private sector which the market will reward appropriately, in addition to urging the government to raise the retirement age beyond 65 (whittington, 2010). in making these remarks, swift was implying that unionized workers are overly compensated janus-faced austerity: strengthening the ‘competitive’ canadian state 42 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research and to be blamed for causing the deep economic downturn. more to the point, it is likely that the key reason swift was encouraging part-time seniors to re-join the labour force was because they remain one of the most ‘easily’ exploitable subsets in the labour market as they are often seen as flexible, part-time, easily disposable and unlikely to demand higher wages and benefits since many are under duress and relying on their meager earnings given inadequate pensions, social supports and rising living costs. contrary to swift’s exaggerated remarks, nearly two-thirds of all canadian workers lack a workplace pension and over 1.6-million seniors get by on less than $15,000 per year. according to the public service alliance of canada (psac, 2010), in 2008 the average federal civil service pension was just over $23,000, which pales in comparison with the “diamond encrusted” pensions and retirement packages for c-level executives (e.g. chief financial and executive officers). furthermore, as toby sanger (2010) of the canadian union of public employees (cupe) has recently shown, total public spending dropped to its lowest since 1974 to about 36 percent of the economy in 2007 while total government revenues from taxes, on the other hand, dropped to less than 32 percent of the economy in 2009, its lowest since 1985. in fact, federal program spending fell from 17.2 percent of gdp in the early-1990s to 11.7 percent by the end of the decade (loxley, 2010). likewise, from 1990-2008, the share of total government spending in the economy has been reduced by 20 percent which, when considering that the federal government plans to cut its corporate tax on income from 18 percent to 15 percent leading to a decline in revenue by $20 billion over the next five-years, may spell long-term budget trouble. with inflation expected to rise 1.7 percent in 2010 and 2 percent or more in 2011, together with the ever-present fear of rating agencies downgrading the federal aaa status, which would lead to vast increases in interest payments and thereby increasing canada’s dependence on foreign capital injections, canada is by no means out of the global slump. as of january 2010, 380,000 more people are unemployed and 270,000 fewer people are employed than 15-months earlier. with the canadian dollar near parity with the us dollar, canada’s manufacturing sector continues to suffer from both the increased penetration of imports and the difficulty of trying to compete in foreign markets, which are either strategically subsidized or draw their ‘competitive advantage’ by poverty-wages or externalizing costs onto the environment. despite productivity output per employee rising by more than 37 percent between 19802005, real wages in canada have been generally stagnant since at least 1982, despite the lowest levels of unemployment since the 1970s prior to the recent economic crisis. there has been an inverse relationship, then, between productivity growth 43 and real wages. in an effort to maintain modest living standards workers have increased their hours of work, emptied their savings, added family members to the workforce, and took on huge debt loads by borrowing against their homes and accepting multiple credit cards. recent job data suggests that a significant majority of newly created jobs are often 10 percent lower than the average wage of the jobs lost, with 20 percent having lost their pension plan by changing jobs (bernard & galarneau, 2010; sanger, 2010b). emerging amidst such blatantly janus-faced austerity is a quest to return to the same old orthodoxy of neoliberalism. under the auspices of ‘spiraling’ budget deficits, growing unemployment and low capacity utilization, conservatives have used the crisis to attack the various segments of the working class, in particular those unionized, to lower wages, extract concessions and increase profits, thereby further indebting ‘consumers’ and leaving them more precarious and with less time to spare than ever. in turn, this further undermines federal fiscal capacities in an attempt to return to a mythical era of unbridled “free market” capitalism and proverbial small government. the urge to curtail unsustainable spending, therefore, obscures capitalist militancy. while working class incomes have either stagnated or declined over the past thirty years, the wealthiest members of society have enjoyed unprecedented gains. while in 1995 the average executive compensation of the top 50 ceo’s in canada was eighty-five times that of the average worker, by 2007 it was two-hundred and fifty-nine times that (mcnally, 2009). likewise, the income share taken by the top 0.1 percent of income earners in canada approached 5 percent by the mid-1990s, a level unseen since the 1930s and early years of wwii. the personal savings rate that was nearly 20.2 percent of disposable income in 1982 had plummeted to 2 percent by 2005 (baragar, 2009). indeed, 2009 marked the highest-ever debt-to-income ratio of 145 percent in canada. the vanier institute of the family found that the average canadian household debt climbed to $96,000 while compared with 2008 mortgages 90-days or more overdue had risen by 50 percent, and the number of credit card holders at least 90-days arrears was up 40 percent. the report also went on the suggest that there is a looming housing bubble in canada as prices toward the end of 2009 rose to about $340,000, which is about five-times the average aftertax income of canadian homes. the long-term trend is just over three and one-halftimes that (sauve, 2010). a sudden rise in interest rates, changes in mortgage terms and the bitter realization that current prices are in the long run unsustainable may cause the bubble to burst. as ‘exit strategies’ come to the forefront, contesting the ruinous effects of these policies becomes a central imperative. janus-faced austerity: strengthening the ‘competitive’ canadian state 44 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research where do we go from here? resisting austerity, reestablishing the power of the working class the capitalist classes have used the economic recession as a strategic political opportunity to strengthen and expand processes of neoliberalism through the state and market, and into every aspect of social life. while the federal government proclaims the need to impose wage freezes, sell off public assets, and restructure social services in the face of the baby boom generation’s looming retirement, this is by no means driven simply by restraint. in fact, just as the federal government has advanced austerity in the face of new spending, it has also pursued massive tax cuts for corporations and the wealthy, rolling out new institutional structures that facilitate the increasing mobility of capital, and utilizing stimulus as a way of subsidizing the burgeoning construction and energy sector. in this context, new government spending does not spell out a return to keynesian policies, but is rather symptomatic of a deepening program of class polarization. how can this be challenged? how may social movements adapt? is the ndp a viable alternative? how can labour unions be pushed in a positive manner? the struggle over austerity cannot be limited to its federal expression as issues related to service retrenchment and the increasing penetration of neoliberal policies manifests throughout the provinces and municipalities. likewise, in an increasingly intertwined global political economy, national and sub-national decisions cannot be abstracted from their international context. while exit strategies targeting the public sector are emerging unconcealed in their aggressiveness and vigor, canadian responses have so far been tepid. the capitalist class is recomposing and repositioning itself to make the public pay, spread the risk and hoard the gains. the shape taken by struggles over austerity and social services may very well dictate the next round of accumulation or, alternatively, lead to something historically unique. indeed, a good many predictions already suggest a looming ‘lost decade’ of austerity. new alignments, coalitions and networks will no doubt emerge. more importantly, however, a frank and sober discussion will need to begin that seeks to move beyond the fractured coalition of network politics in hopes of creating something historically unique, all-encompassing and capable of challenging what the working class is collectively up against. the course of neoliberalism has thoroughly beaten down what vestiges remain of trade union militancy and existing social movements must come to the bitter realization of historical defeat. this is the only realistic starting point from which to move forward (anderson, 2000). three decades of neoliberalism have eroded whatever ‘progressive’ remnants of social-democratic and labour parties that exist. the ndp is not an alternative and neither is, regrettably, the green party trapped in erstwhile eco-capitalist “solutions”. both parties have no transformative vision of society, adhere to the eco45 nomic agenda of neoliberalism and display no interest in challenging the logic of capital or the democratic functions of the state. moreover, they remain entrapped in top-down organizational structures with little interest in building mobilizational capacities at the community and grassroots level. finally, when in power they have strayed little from conservative and liberal policies. this is demonstrated time and again in the countless cutbacks and repressive policies of a good many social democratic governments’ over the past three decades (caroll & ratner, 2005). moreoever, organized labour bodies from the canadian labour congress to the ontario federation of labour, canadian auto workers and canadian union of public employees, for instance, have increasingly shown signs of confusion having failed to break ideologically or politically with a social dependence on capital and by their inability to meaningfully intervene in recent battles. great political and social divergences between local’s and their national or provincial affiliates continue to mar the collective bargaining landscape. if worker militancy as demonstrated by workplace stoppages is an indication of growing labour unrest, the 126 workplace stoppages in 2006 (its lowest since 1935) pales in comparison with the historic high of 1,173 in 1974, and indeed paints a grim picture of the state of labour militancy in canada (workman, 2009). by focusing narrowly on workplace gains such as, say, higher wages, the capitalist class and a good many politicians feed off the rhetoric that workplace gains undermine social services. this is a trap that labour gets caught up in when it focuses only on workplace benefits. labour will need to develop counter-narrative strategies and seek to politicize their gains by rooting them in their communities and also in the form of non-economic improvements (paid leave, educationals, etc). unfortunately, instead of inspiring new waves of mass protest, demonstrations and the spawning of new working class organizations, the current global economic insecurity seems to have weakened labour’s resolve and risks signaling its ultimate class defeat. to conclude, the power of capital and the state, as well as the impasse of both organized labour and many social movements to confront what the working class is collectively up against, belies the need for a new kind of radical, anti-capitalist political project suited to the current historical and social conjuncture. new political experiments will need to emerge that aim to incorporate the strongest elements of the traditional party, trade unions, social movements and community groups. in this regard, the left may due well to study the growing brashness of political and economic elites as they reconfigure and reorganize themselves to seize the crisis. nevertheless, the european anti-austerity protests and emergent anti-capitalist projects may provide a glimmer of optimism. what is certain is that the failure to take up such a challenge to reestablish the power of the working class in canada would be to accept the existing social relations as unalterable and would therefore recognize the right of capital to exploit labour. janus-faced austerity: strengthening the ‘competitive’ canadian state 46 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research references albo, g. (1993). the public sector impasse & the administrative question. studies in political economy, 42, 113-127. albo, g. (1994). ‘competitive austerity’ & the impasse of capitalist employment policy. socialist register, 30, 144-170. albo, g., s. gindin., and l. pantich. (2010). in and out of crisis: the global financial meltdown and left alternatives. oakland, california: spectre pm press. anderson, p. (2000). renewals. new left review, 2 (1), 5-24. anderson, g. (2010). fiscal federalism: a comparative introduction. oxford: oxford university press. armstrong, p., amaratunga, c., bernier, j., grant, k., pederson, a., and k. willson (eds.). (2001). exposing privatization: women and health care reform in canada. aurora, ontario: garamond press. baragar, f. & m. seccareccia. (2008). financial restructuring: implications of recent canadian macroeconomic developments. studies in political economy, 82, 61-83. baragar, f. canada & the crisis. (2009). in guard, j. & w. antony (eds.), bankruptcies & bailouts (pp.77-106). halifax: fernwood. battle, k., s. torjman, m. mendelson, and e. tamagno. (2007). mixed brew for the ‘coffee shop’ budget. ottawa: caledon institute of social policy. bernard, a., and d. galarneau. (2010). layoffs in canada. statistics canada. retreived on august 7, 2010 from, http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/75-001-x/2010105/article/11161-eng.htm. bezanson, k. (2010). “childcare delivered through the mailbox:” social reproduction, choice, and neoliberalism in a theo-conservative canada. in braedley, s. and m. luxton (eds.), neoliberalism and everyday life (pp.90-112) montreal & kingston: mcgill-queens university press. brenner, n. & n. theodore (eds.). (2002). spaces of neoliberalism: urban restructuring in north america & western europe. oxford: blackwell. brown, l. (31, march 2010). public sector workers paying for corporate tax cuts. national union of public and general employees. retrieved on april 12 2010, from, http://www.nupge.ca/content/public-sector-workers-paying-corporate-tax-cuts. campbell, b. (2009). the global economic crisis and its canadian dimension. canadian centre for policy alternatives. retrieved online on june 7, 2010 from, http://www.policyalternatives. ca/publications/monitor/global-economic-crisis-and-its-canadian-dimension. 47 campion-smith, b. (19, february 2010). aging workforce to drive up debt: report. toronto star [online]. retrieved february 25, 2010 from, http://www.thestar.com/business/article/767833--aging-workforce-to-drive-up-debt-report carroll, w.k., & r.s. ratner (eds.). (2005). challenges and perils: social democracy in neoliberal times. nova scotia: fernwood press. clarke, s. (2005). the neoliberal theory of society. in saad-filho, a. & d. johnston (eds.), neoliberalism: a critical reader (pp.50-59). london: pluto press. department of finance. (2010). minister of finance highlights budget measure to cut red tape and boost venture capital for canadian firms. retrieved on september 9, 2010 from, http://www. fin.gc.ca/n10/10-079-eng.asp. dobbin, m. (24 may 2010). the canadian ‘good banks’ myth. the vancouver sun. retrieved on july 30, 2010 from, http://communities.canada.com/vancouversun/blogs/communityofinterest/archive/2010/05/24/the-canadian-good-banks-myth.aspx?commentposted=true#comme ntmessage. fanelli, c., and j. paulson. (2009). municipal malaise: neoliberal urbanism and the future of our cities. the bullet. retrieved on july 1, 2010 from, http://www.socialistproject.ca/bullet/357. php. galabuzi, g.e. (2006). canada’s economic apartheid: the social exclusion of racialized groups in the new century. toronto: canadian scholars’ press. gindin, s. (2010). working peoples assemblies. relay, 30, 24-26. government of canada. (2010). a stronger canada. a stronger economy. now and for the future. retrieved on april 25, 2010 from, http://www.discours.gc.ca/grfx/docs/sft-ddt-2010_e.pdf. hussan, s.k., and m. scott. (2009). jason kenney’s doublespeak exposed: tories unleash canada service border services on migrants. the bullet. retrieved january 8, 2010 from, http://www. socialistproject.ca/bullet/bullet207.html. johnson, r., and r. mahon. nafta: the redesign and rescaling of canada’s welfare state. studies in political economy, 76, 7-30. kipfer, s., and r. keil. (2002). toronto inc? planning the competitive city in the new toronto. antipode, 34 (2), p.227-264. lahey, k. (2009). gender analysis of 2009. progressive economics forum [online]. retrieved january 14, 2010 from http://www.progressiveeconomics.ca/2009/01/31/gender-analysis-ofbudget-2009/. mackenzie, h. (2004). financing canada’s hospitals: alternatives to p3s. retrieved on june 2, 2009 from, http://www.web.net/ohc/p3s.htm#p3reports. janus-faced austerity: strengthening the ‘competitive’ canadian state 48 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research mcbride, s. (2005). paradigm shift: globalization & the canadian state: halifax: fernwood press. mckinnon, i. r. (1997). the logic of market-preserving federalism. virginia law review, 83 (7), p. 1573-1580. mcnally, d. (2009). inequality, the profit-system and the global crisis. in guard, j. & w. antony (eds.), bankruptcies & bailouts (pp. 32-42). halifax: fernwood. noonen, j. (2009). the windsor cupe strike: implications for the labour movement & the left. the bullet. retrieved on october 23, 2009 from, http://www.socialistproject.ca/bullet/ bullet236.html ontario health coaltion. (2008). when public relations trump public accountability: the evolution of cost overruns, service cuts and cover-up in the brampton hospital p3. retrieved on july 14, 2009 from, http://www.web.net/ohc/jan08report%20final.pdf. ontario public service employees union local 479. (2007). risky business ii. retrieved on april 7, 2009 from, http://www.opseu.org/bps/health/p3report.pdf. panitch, l. & d. swartz. (2003). from consent to coercion: the assault on trade union freedoms. aurora, on: garamond press. paz, a. (2008). harvest of injustice: the oppression of migrant workers on canadian farms. the bullet. retreived on may 2, 2009 from, http://www.socialistproject.ca/bullet/bullet117.html. peck, jamie and adam tickell. (2002). neoliberalizing space. antipode, 34 (3): 380-404. public service alliance of canada. (2010). seven myths about public service pensions. retrieved on may 5, 2009 from, http://www.psac-afpc.org/petition-pension/mythes-e.asp. rosenfeld, h. (2009). the north american auto industry in crisis. monthly review, 61 (2),18-36. saad-filho, a. & d. johnston (eds.). (2005). neoliberalism: a critical reader. london: pluto press. qian, y. and r. weingast (1996). china’s transition to markets: market-preserving federalism, chinese style. journal of policy reform, 1, p.149-185. sanger, t. (2010). economic climate for bargaining. canadian union of public employees, 7 (1), 1-15. sanger, t. (2010b). the new grecian formula: still toxic. progressive economics forum. retreived on june 22, 2010 from, http://www.progressive-economics.ca/2010/06/18/the-new-grecianformula-still-toxic/. sauve, r. (2010). the current state of canadian family finances: 2009 report. ottawa: vif. sinclair, s. (2010). negotiating from weakness: canada-eu treaty threatens canadian purchasing policies & public services. canadian centre for policy alternatives. ottawa: ccpa. 49 speech from the throne. (2006). restoring fiscal balance in canada: focusing on priorities. government of canada, budget 2006. retrieved on august 21, 2010 from, http://www.fin.gc.ca/ budget06/pdf/fp2006e.pdf. speech from the throne. (2006). canada’s economic action plan. government of canada, budget 2009. retrieved on august 25, 2010 from, http://www.actionplan.gc.ca/grfx/docs/ecoplan_e. pdf teelucksingh, c., & g.e. galabuzzi. (2005). working precariously: the impact of race and immigrant status on employment opportunities and outcomes in canada. toronto: canadian race relations foundation. thomas, m.p. (2010). labour migration and temporary work: canada’s foreign-worker programs in the “new economy”. in pupo, n. & m.p. thomas (eds.), interrogating the new economy: restructuring work in the 21st century (pp.149-172). toronto: university of toronto press. trade justice network. (2010). fact sheets: overview. retrieved on april 28, 2010 from, http:// www.tradejustice.ca/overview?bl=y. tufts, s. (2004). building the ‘competitive city’: labour and toronto’s bid to host the olympic games. geoforum, 35 (1), p.47-58. veira, p. (5, march 2010). budget foreign investment shift ‘masterstroke’. financial post [online]. retrieved march 6 2010, from http://www.financialpost.com/story.html?id=2647200 warskett, r. (2007). remaking the canadian labour movement: transformed work & transformed labour strategies. in shalla, v. & w. clement (eds.), work in tumultuous times: critical perspectives (pp.380-400). montreal & kingston: mcgill-queens university press. weingast, b. (1995). the economic role of political institutions: market-preserving federalism and economic development. journal of law, economics, & organization, 20 (1), 1-31. weir, e. (2009). the treasury transfer effect. canadian centre for policy alternatives, 10 (7), 1-8. whittington, l. (20, february 2010). tories target civil servants pensions. toronto star [online]. retrieved february 22 2010, from http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/article/768588-tories-target-civil-service-pensions wood, e.m. (2002). the origin of capitalism: a longer view. london: verso. workman, t. (2009). if your in my way, i’m walking: the assault on working people since 1970. halifax: fernwood. janus-faced austerity: strengthening the ‘competitive’ canadian state 50 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research symposium on braverman _ comments by john porter i cannot comment on michael burawoy's paper from the point of view of any of the current "problematiques" of contemporary marxism, since i am not schooled in them. what little i have read does not particularly help me in clarifying the kinds of problems that interest me. but when i first read braverman, i was very much impressed and after rereading large sections of the book for this particular task, i am still very much impressed and i do not make that judgement in terms of his contribution, whatever that may be, to marxian labour economics or marxian sociology. nor is it because what braverman has said is new. most of this compilation of materials studies of work, labour force statistics and other things we knew before. perhaps i was impressed because the book was an articulate reminder of facts we did know but were prepared to overlook, and i use "we" here in the sense of the whole gamut of followers of conventional social science, of the post-second-world war period. i think we were prepared to overlook this evidence because of our overconcern for economic growth as the raison-d'etre of industrialization, and the way we saw worker productivity linked to economic growth. as well we believed consumption to be one of the major goals of the industrialization process. so convinced were we of these objectives, both those in actual work situations and those studying them, that we overlooked much of the change that braverman analyses. certainly social scientists accepted growth and upgrading of the labour force as basic to modernism, and i think the best illustration of that is found in every intergenerational mobility matrix where one compares the marginals of fathers and sons, and takes the difference as representative of progress because overall 23 alternate routes the sons have done better than the fathers. the objective of the exercise in mobility analysis is to discover how respondents have exploited the opportunity provided by occupational upgrading. so we ask whether or not the class structure is permeable, and to what degree. again, the basic assumption underlying analyses of these father-son occupational data, on which i have been engaged myself, is that the overall effects of industrialization have been beneficial and progressive. social scientists, of course, bear this burden of oversight, or guilt depending on how severe one considers the offence to be. i can remember papers back in the fifties in which industrial sociology was being condemned as "cow" sociology, and in which industrial psychology was referred to as deep therapy on the assembly line, so that the picture is not totally one of the social sciences going to work for capitalist enterprise, although i would not deny for a moment that that has been their major thrust. there have always been critics of this direction, however. many of the things said about the degradation of work, or the character of work, have been criticized through various art forms, if not sociology, and certainly taylorism has been subject to ridicule for a very long time. so i would see braverman's contribution as a massive critique of what work has become, whether or not he made any contribution to theory. i think the critique is particularly strong not only because of his analysis of work in the factory, but also because of the extent to which automation and new forms of technology have affected the tertiary sector, as well as the application of science and technology to the work process and the effects they have brought about. also, his observations (he is eclectic here) on the role of education and how it has helped to create the illusion of upgrading 24 symposium on braverman of the contemporary labour force is consistent with other current criticisms of credential ism. his appendix on occupational classifications is fascinating for anybody who has attempted to develop occupational classifications, but more importantly his analysis of the methodology of the prevailing official ones, more than any other part of the book calls into question the notion of an upgraded labour force. all of these things add up to a tremendously powerful critique of how we have looked at work. 25 book review: debt, the imf, and the world bank | 255 book review debt, the imf, and the world bank: sixty questions, sixty answers by eric toussaint and damien millet. new york: monthly review press, 2010. $17.95 us. isbn: 978-1-58367-222-8. pages: 1-361. reviewed by jillian l. curtin1 in their book, debt, the imf, and the world bank: sixty questions, sixty answers, eric toussaint and damien millet provide an extensive overview of the impact that debt has on highly indebted poor countries (hipcs). they show how debt inhibits hipcs from investing in infrastructure, health, education, and other development-oriented socialpolicies. the problem, they argue, is not just debt itself, but the capitalist global economic system that fuels it. this process contributes to an endless cycle of poverty and human suffering. the book is written for a general audience. it is organized in a way that showcases the causes of the cyclical debt crisis, the major actors involved, and ways of addressing the problems. it is especially proficient in outlining how private actors in the global financial system have had a negative impact on hipcs. throughout the book toussaint and millet display marxists overtones. their critique of the global financial system and the exploitive nature of the global trade system is accurate. they provide some “radical alternatives” to the current, broken system. however, many of their ideas are not overly radical. for example, their argument focusing on the elimination of structural adjustment programs (saps) is in line with many other experts in the field. in fact, this discussion on saps is the highlight of the book. toussaint and millet give an in depth explanation of the role saps have played in this debt crisis. they describe them as entities geared toward developing institutions and policies to allow private foreign investment into countries. this process shapes the structure of the domestic political economic policy in debtor countries. it gives lenders 1 jillian curtin is currently completing her ph.d. in political science at carleton university, with a focus on political economy. she specializes in governance of the global economy and the politics of private enterprise. she is also the co-founder and content manager of discourse magazine. 256 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism the ability to control indebted countries through conditionality which has helped to create a system of dependence, exploitation, and indirect rule. the use of saps not only interferes with sovereignty but implies that some countries lack the ability to rule themselves. toussaint and millet argue that any lending should consist of a simple transaction in which the lender provides money solely on the condition that the debtor will pay it back. conditions should not be applied. it is difficult to disagree with this position. interestingly, toussaint and millet do not call for the abolition of lending and debt all-together. however, they do argue against usury. they claim that private banks and investment houses in the global north have been making “easy money” off of the global south. these countries have paid back their debts – many times over – but the interest in some cases is so high that an endless cycles of debt ensues. they also argue against certain foreign “investment” in hipcs. they believe that often this “investment” is a cover which allows wealthier countries to take hipcs’ natural resources without sufficient financial compensation. this has had profound ecological and economic consequences for hipcs and is why the shift toward chinese investment – even though china infringes less on sovereignty – is simply exchanging one resource exploiter for another. they articulate that the process of external loans in exchange for resources does not help a hipc establish long-term human and/or economic development. it is the conditions under which lending and debt are currently conducted which is the crux of the problem. one problem with this book is the way in which it answers its own questions. while they ask some great questions, often their answers could be further unpacked. for example, in addition to their argument on how debt has redistributed financial resources from important social policies like health and education they make some important points about the impact of debt on resources and food sovereignty. but, the analysis of these problems is somewhat shallow. more space could have been dedicated to explaining why these areas are essential to meaningful development. the analysis is also problematic when they discuss the significance of self-determination and the right to self-governance. deeper, empirically grounded examples and a theoretical examination of the consequences of resources depletion and food sovereignty would have added more to their argument and allowed this book to make a deeper contribution to contemporary debates on development and debt. book review: debt, the imf, and the world bank | 257 a second problem is, at several points, the book borders on becoming a polemic. often the author’s choice of words is incendiary. they use loaded language to support their argument in areas where more empirically based explanations are desirable. this detracts from their overall argument. for example, they claim that the debt burden has “crushed all attempts” for hipcs to develop. in addition to the implication of hopelessness, the tenor of the phrase externalizes the responsibility of development and ignores any complicity amongst the governments of the hipcs. this is a problem found throughout the book. another issue with this work is that their solutions are only partly explained. they argue that much of the citizenry in hipcs are too poor to formally participate in the market. as such, only governments are able to redistribute wealth and provide the programs necessary for human and economic development. however, they do not adequately address the potential problems of economic corruption associated with authoritarian regimes and shell governments. their correlation between the elimination of debt and deterring the formation and maintenance of authoritarian regimes is weakly argued. the rationale toussaint and millet do provide – that the immediate forgiveness of debt acquired under dictators would deter external lenders from providing credit to dictators – counters their own call for the abolition of the current risk and confidence-based financial system. this is a logical inconsistency in the book. government control of economic assets often leads to dictatorships. toussaint and millet also fail to explain how wealth will be generated in these countries once debt is forgiven. aside from these problems toussaint and millet do provide a general overview of how the burden of debt is crippling development efforts in many countries. this is an ongoing crisis that has been overlooked in the wake of the current economic crisis that is preoccupying european and american politics. their question and answer and answer format makes their work easy to understand. this book provides an enticing argument for interested readers with little to no background in economics, politics, or development studies. sociology, philosophy and materialism wilfrid denis few sociologists question whether their writings in sociology are scientific. having settled the issue of "science" in social science long ago, the major task for sociologists is conceived as empirical research and its relationship to theory. since a certain definition of science is usually taken for granted, the scientificity of new theories and approaches is evaluated on the basis of existing social science. issues such as contradictory definitions of science are usually left to philosophers while theoretical questions are debated within a common conception of science. at least, this was the situation until fairly recently. recent developments which have changed such a situation include the impact of some philosophical debates on sociologists , the development of phenomenology/ethnomethodology in sociology, and the pheonix-like rise of marxism in the 1960's. these three factors, each in their own right, have shaken the philosophical foundations of traditional sociology and produced very awkward if not insurmountable theoretical and philosophical problems for current sociology. this paper focuses on the philosophical dimension in social theory and attempts to deal with it in terms of social analysis and the development of a science of man. using thomas kuhn as a starting point, i shall review some of the literature on sociological theory, indicating the major difficulties of discussing social theory while omitting any philosophical dimension. efforts to include a minimum of philosophy in theory will also be included. after commenting on the problems inherent in such efforts, i shall summarize a recent attempt at elaborating the philosophical bases of sociology, as a demonstration of the kind of exercise necessary to overcome these problems. 73 alternate routes my closing comments will take the form of a discussion on the relationship of philosophy to sociology. my position essentially is that social theory cannot be fully understood without its philosophical roots. through these roots, social theories are directly related to the actual and historical dimensions of social reality. the philosophical traditions and premises ingrained in social theory comprise basic worldviews which reflect class ideologies. thus the discussion of various philosophies of science lead us to conclude with a few summary statements on the ideological dimension of social theory. i. sociology without philosophy since the turn of the century, sociology has been largely antiphilosophical. passing references are made to philosophical traditions which engendered the discipline. after all, it is difficult to mention corate and not refer to "positivism". but, in spite of a "sociology of knowledge" , the philosophical underpinnings of sociological theories and approaches rarely surface in the literature. it is possible at times in empirical research to tease out ontological and epistemological assumptions. however, disdain or unconcern for these aspects, frequently results in a lact of logical consistency and continuity. theoretical and conceptual syntheses and borrowings very often contain contradictory premises, which, when pushed to their limits, reveal a jumbled and incoherent philosophical base. as stated earlier, recent events are stimulating a greater willingness among sociologists to discuss assumptions inherent in their theories, interest in this dimension of theory has manifested itself in the widespread usage of the concept "paradigm" and the numerous attempts to identify the major "paradigms" in sociology. 74 sociology. . .materialism thomas kuhn's the structure of scientific revolutions is largelyresponsible for the current popularity of the term "paradigm". for kuhn (19?0»10) paradigms arei "accepted examples of actual scientific practise.. . (which) provide models from which spring particular coherent traditions of scientific research." such models include the laws, theories, applications and instrumentations accepted as being scientific by a community of scholars in a discipline. according to kuhn, scientific paradigms go through various stages. as a paradigm becomes dominant, it enters a normal stage where research is done within its intellectual framework. new explanations are not sought, and when they surface, they are rejected as being "unscientific", as knowledge expands, certain anomalies develop which cannot be adequately explained by the dominant paradigm. as these anomalies become increasingly salient, the dominant paradigm enters a crisis stage. alternate explanations are sought. a new kind of explanation develops and replaces the former paradigm through a scientific revolution. the new paradigm may have less explanatory power than the established paradigm generally, but it claims to at least solve the latter* s "crisis provoking problem". however, changing paradigm is not a question of logic or rationality, since even these are paradigm dependent. rather, the new paradigm involves a new way of seeing the world. the simplest and most obvious examples arei the world as round rather than flat; or revolving around the sun, rather than center of the universe. such a change of perspective requires a change of one 4 s mental set akin to religious conversion. acceptance of the new paradigm becomes largely a question of faith, of "subjective and aesthetic considerations" (19?0« 144-159). thus kuhn rejects the notion of objective theory free criteria for evaluating competing paradigms. 75 alternate routes that kuhn refers almost exclusively to the natural sciences, and that he uses the term in twenty-two different ways (kuhn 1970 » 181 j ritzer 1975 »*0 presents problems for sociologists adopting his concept 2 and theory . the term has been reduced to three types by masterman (kuhn 1970:17^). at the highest level, a metaphysical paradigm presents a total world view in a given science. at the next level "sociological" paradigms are more concrete and specific interpretations of the world view. it includes theories and problems to be solved based on accepted examples of research. the lowest level is the construct paradigm which includes tools, instruments and research measurement techniques . most sociologists who use the concept "paradigm" refer to the two lowest levels. merton (1968«104) for example uses the term in the narrow sense of codification of concepts, problems, procedures, and inferences related to a particular theory. such a codification has a dual purpose! the clarification and tighter specification of the whole conceptual apparatus one brings to a problem; and consciousness-raising. codification should make researchers aware of the political, ideological, and scientific implications of the tacit assumptions underlying concepts (i968tl09). merton's paradigm can be summarized in this schemai (manifest effect * ; latent effect > ): consciousness raising > > codification political, taxonomy hypothesis,-^ ideological, theory > of si >* assumptions—» scientific ^-^ concepts ^ procedures, and ** problems //.» tests tacit ideological, theory > of a :ientific .»-* concepts^ procedures,, implications ' ' " * and *, ^j such codification indicates a theory can have more than one 76 sociology. . .materialism "paradigm" which then become confined to problem areas. this leads merton (1968:69) to refer to paradigms of deviant behaviour, racial intermarriage, and sociology of knowledge.. although recognizing the importance of underlying assumptions, merton 's (i968i73_136) own effort at codifying functionalism emphasizes clarification of concepts through empirical research, and pays scant attention to "consciousness-raising". his "tacit assumptions" may refer to different philosophical traditions, but his own work on functionalism indicates that his analysis stops at the much lower level of differences between theories. goertzel (1976) and alford (1975) both attempt to classify theories in political sociology into three paradigms » elite, class, and pluralism. for goertzel (19?6:6) the basis of theoretical models are "the basic beliefs about the nature of man and society", whereas alford (1975 » 1^5) acknowledges "...the implicit but powerful influence of the assumptions upon all aspects of the intellectual processes involved 1 selection of problems, unit of analysis, key terms, definition .of the relevant data, interpretation of data and generalizations beyond data." for both goertzel and alford, paradigms are equivalent to theoretical models whose bases are alternate conceptions of the organization and distribution of power in society. both restrict their analyses to the political realm. goertzel (1976 »42) even goes so far as to claim that the three paradigms often agree about facts. it is at the level of interpretation that disagreement occurs. "but on the more mundane level of social research, the three perspectives can often be effectively combined." alford associates different explanatory power to each paradigm, and thus each of his paradigms corresponds to one of the three levels 77 alternate routes at which society can be analysed. pluralism explains the actions and mobilization of individuals and small groups; elite analysis explains decision making and social structures at the institutional level; and class analysis "sets limits of policy formation and of state structure within class relations of a given society." (1975«153). although alford is more consistent in demonstrating the effect assumptions can have on a theory and its analysis, he doesn't systematically discuss the fundamental differences between his paradigms. his discussion convincingly demonstrates the relationship between implicit assumptions and the competing perceptions of power in society. but, the implicit assumptions which he discusses remain in the political realm. these assumptions, part of a philosophical tradition lead alford to accept the state, the political, as the base of power in society. the result is such conceptual monstrosities as to identify fascism as the pathological form of the class paradigm (1975' 15° )• for both alford and goertzel, the issue is one of competing interpretations of fact rather than one of alternate definitions of reality. the importance of certain ontological assumptions are recognized, but these are not systematically linked to different philosophical traditions which include different methodologies, definitions of science, and conceptions of reality. ritzer (1975) develops the idea of sociology as a multi-paradigm discipline, also identifying three paradigms: social fact, social definition, and social behaviour. ritzer (1975«?) claims a synthesis of kuhn's three types by defining paradigms as "a fundamental image of the subject matter within a science". already a contradiction appears between his definition of "a fundamental image" and his three 78 sociology. . .materialism paradigms. either sociology consists of three sciences or his paradigms are identical. although each paradigm incorporates a number of theories, these share the same values, methodology and subject matter. ritzer can be summarized as follows! ftiradigm: examplari subject matters theories t methods! social fact social definition durkheim suicide weber social action social facts a) structural functionalism individual definition of social facts a) action theory b) symbolic intersocial behaviour skinner beyond freedom and dignity human behaviour a) behavioural sociology b) exchange theory b) conflict theory actionism c) systems theory c) phenomenology ethnomethodology dramaturgy survey, questionobservation, interview experimental, naire, interviews laboratory and real life the base for each paradigm is the definition given to its subject matter. since ritzer adds a special category of "paradigm bridgers", most sociological literature could be thus classified. durkheim, weber and marx bridged the first two paradigms, while parsons covered all three (1975 t 212-216). there is also the possibility that new schools such as the frankfurt school, or social biology might become paradigms. but the major concern for ritzer is the political bickering between sociologists using different paradlgns. unfortunately, he does not relate this to "underlying values" which he recognizes but does not deal with extensively. to do so may have lead to a certain awareness of his own assumptions underlying his call for peace in sociology so that syntheses, bridges, and "triangulation" between paradigms can lead the day to a brighter sociology. this lack of depth also manifests 79 alternate routes itself in his assumption that the images on which his paradigms rest all reflect the same social reality. the idea that contradictory definitions of reality are involved, is never entertained. ritzer claims to include the metaphysical dimension in his paradigms, but i find it lacking. as a result his taxonomy becomes artificial and limited to secondary characteristics. its boundaries remain superficial as long as they are not based on more fundamental aspects of these perspectives. in this respect, j. turner (1978: 11 ) is more consistent in using the terms "orientation" and "perspective" to identify the equivalent of ritzer' s "paradigms". turner identifies four major orientations in sociology: functional, conflict, exchange and interactionist orientations. recognizing that there exist "sharp disagreements among advocates of these four orientations", turner states that the divergences are not fundamental enough to constitute paradigms. contrary to ritzer, turner sees the overlap and convergence of these orientations as indicating that they fall within the same broad overview. nevertheless, turner recognizes the development of another paradigm, ethnomethodology, which has developed from german phenomonology and interactionism. this new approach presents an alternate view of the social world (1978:404-421 ). turner states that his four orientations share a common base (kuhn's metaphysical level), from which he can discuss similarities and differences of these 4 four orientations while recognizing the development of another paradigm . but, turner does not analyse the fundamental differences between his two paradigms in great detail. nor does he refer to the frankfurt or althusserian "schools". he presents an excellent discussion of positivist 80 sociology. . .materialism sociology but without elaborating its philosophical base. ii . sociology and some philosophy so far, one might conclude that sociologists are not fully aware of the level at which one locates "tacit assumptions", "basic beliefs" and "images of subject matter". their sociology of knowledge would seem inadequate for discussing the core issue of fundamental philosophical differences . such conclusions are partly correct, but some sociologists do attempt to delve into this aspect of theory. their efforts have given rise to what could be called the "crisis in sociology" literature. the word "crisis" immediately brings to mind gouldner's work, the coming crisis of western sociology . arguing that sociology is affected by sub-theoretical sets of beliefs, he attempts to demonstrate the presence, source and effects of such background assumptions in parsonian structural-functionalism. interesting as gouldner's work is, it is very incomplete because it limits itself to one exemplar of a paradigm, and does not effectively contrast it with the assumptions of alternate forms of sociology. neither does he elaborate on his own "reflexive sociology" (smart 19?6tl0). gouldner, like the sociologists above, fails to push his analysis to its philosophical roots. consequently, he overlooks the fundamental differences which he claims underlies parsonian sociology and his own reflexive sociology. the popularity of gouldner's "crisis" can be explained largely by the rise of phenomenology-ethnomethodology, and its challenge to the structuralist-functionalist perspective. some sociologists argue that what is involved is not just a new methodology, or a new way of collec7 ting data, but another way of seeing the world . it is presented as 81 alternate routes a different definition of social reality (mason in thorns 1976:103-114; filmer 1972 1 j. turner 1978:408-9). some sociologists pursue the matter even further. smart (1976) contends that marxian analysis and phenomenology cannot be integrated into academic sociology without questionning the assumptions of each regarding the nature of social reality and the subjective/objective distinctions. his discussion of contemporary sociology lead him to conclude that both critical theory (frankfurt) and marxian phenomenology "share the beginnings of an approach to study society" which overcome the problems of positivism and german phenomenology (19?6:153)« only by integrating marx, as in the frankfurt school for example, will sociology eliminate its reifications and ideological distortions, and be able to overcome not only epistemological differences, but also its political complicity. not all sociologists who perceive epistemological differences in distinct "kinds" of sociology take such a strong stance. many eagerly call for immediate syntheses. brown (1977) for example sees essentially two epistemological approaches to sociology » positivist-empiricist, and phenomenology-ethnomethodology; one materialist, the other subjectivist or idealist. for him, however, science and sociology are simply symbol systems which do not have any priority or ascendance over such systems. brown then uses aesthetics to evaluate the symbol systems in sociology in hope of developing a metalanguage to overcome epistemological differences between empiricists and subjectivists. such a creation will allow for an "epistemlc self-consciousness for sociological thought" (brown 1977 »243). "this view finds its justification in a post-positlvist, post romantic, dialectical, symbolic realist theory of knowledge." 82 sociology. . .materialism (brown 1977*233). his approach reveals the philosophical superficiality of his analysis. his symbolic realism places him squarely in the idealist camp. thus, his efforts although acceptable within this perspective, will immediately be rejected by positivists as pure idealist abstractions. the materialist-idealist dilemma is obviously not a fresh rediscovery. oestereicher (1968) attempted to deal with it ten years ago. drawing on similarities between hegel, marx and g.h. mead, he seeks a social-psychological explanation of the development of science within a structural context. the need to compare "facts" is not the issue, but rather "the conceptual structures which organize them and give them meaning '{ 1968 »^3) • oestereicher argues against the empiricist tradition that science develops through accumulation of facts. agreeing with kuhn to a certain extent, he maintains that science develops through a succession of conceptual schemas which provide different perspectives with which to order and give meanings to facts. "we may only assume that the structuration of rational thought tends to take the form of successive states of dynamic equilibrium and that the increasing generality and inclusiveness of these states corresponds to the increase of rational human knowledge itself" (1968:2^8) the above comment for brown is equally applicable to oestereicher. neither one recognizes the importance of the questions on the origins of "the structuration of rational thought',' let alone address the issue. zeitlln (l973) does essentially the same thing. after criticizing the more established positivist approaches, such as structural-functionalism, conflict and exchange theories, he seeks to develop a marx-weber model of historical analysis, based largely on c.w.mills interpretation of marx. to this he adds phenomenology and the dialectical naturalism of both marx and g.h.mead. needless to say his ieferences to marx are limited to the "young marx',' that, is mostly the theses on feuerbach and 83 alternate routes the economic and philosophical manuscripts of 1844 . this leads to a final attempt at discovering the convergence of freud (as interpreted by marcuse), head and marx so as to provide a structural basis for social psychology. zeitlin present the usual critiques of positivist sociology (a-historical, pro-status quo, etc.) then flirts with epistemology in marx (l9?3«243-9) to produce forth his synthesis. although zeitlin (1973 » preface) claims his synthesis hmost adequately considers both the structural and situational dimension of the social process" it seems theoretically weak. the use of relnterpretations of marx by mills and of freud by marcuse, as well as the emphasis on the young marx indicates the nature of his synthesis. mead, marx, and freud are interpreted from within the same perspctlve, one which emphasises the situational dimension and which, in spite of zeitlin' s claim, leaves out the structural aspect. other works similar to the above exist. but these well-known cases illustrate very well the fundamental weakness. the point is not that the authors fail to include a systematic analysis of the various philosophical traditions in sociology. the point is that they have not done so for the theories which they use. thus even if recognition of different traditions is given, the failure to systematically examine their basis results in syntheses and comparisons based either on secondary aspects, or on a compatible re-interpretation. consequently such work falls within one specific tradition or other. iii. critique of sociology without philosophy there are a number of related points to be made from the above discussions. first, there is much confusion in the definition and the usage of the concept "paradigm". avoiding or overlooking the actual 84 sociology. . .material ism philosophical basis of paradigms results in conceptual confusion which accounts for much of the terminological confusion. philosophical underpinnings provide the conceptual orientation of the paradigms, and consequently affect, if not determine, the theories, concepts, methods ar*l research problems. the conceptual orientation coincides with certain ideological currents (ie positivism and liberalism). both have a direct effect on the values and the political orientation academics develop. without a systematic elaboration of these aspects of paradigms, the term itself becomes more of a fad than a meaningful concept in sociology. secondly, since .sociologists generally "do" theory without philosophy, they fail to grasp the importance of kuhn's religious conversion from one paradigm to another. since what is involved is changing completely one's worldview, it seems improbable that people can shift readily from one to another. yet this is implied by many taxonomies. loose definitions of paradigms and lack of a philosophical base allow such authors to discover "bridgers", syntheses, "paradigm jumpers" and other such energumen. such classifications are superficial and incomplete. their arbitrariness results in limited usefulness and reduced accuracy. another aspect to this problem is that without a philosophical base, sociologists are prone to discover numerous theoretical syntheses. these usually assume that gradual quantitative change in theory can lead to qualitative change. although kuhn (l9?0:l8l) later attenuated the importance of qualitative change in theory, the notion of revolution in science remains central to his argument. one simple example illustrates the significance of such change. to think of the world as round 85 alternate routes instead of flat presents few problems of qualitative change for modern theorists. undoubtedly some will argue that such a simple example is not analogous to modern complex social theories. but, the principle is still the same, and such a simple example does indicate the type of change which qualifies as qualitative and revolutionary, in kuhn's terms, gradual quantitative change can set the stage, but it does not actuate or induce this more fundamental change. rupture is necessary to pass from one type of change to the other, and from one type of theory to another. to attempt syntheses of contradicting theories is not only impossible when the full significance of the opposing world views are appreciated, but unnecessary. to attempt it leads only to obscurantism. to successfully synthesize such theories indicates a fundamental agreement, a common pardigmatic base from which the theories either originate 9 or are interpreted. there are few, if any, syntheses between paradigms, many within. thirdly, sociologists are generally not aware of their own paradigm, that is, the philosophical foundation or their own thought. as kuhn states regarding "normal science',' the world view is taken so much for granted that it is never questionned; it never comes to mind, unless challenged by an alternate paradigm, and even then. consequently many sociologists find it easy to do syntheses, discover "bridgers" and the rest, since they are operating essentially on the same epistemological and ontological assumptions. the confusion in sociology as to different "philosophies of science" may well be the result of positivist sociology's attempt to separate itself from philosophy. as marcuse (l 955 « 323-388) argues, comte inaugurated this seperatlon, and emplricist-positivists have eagerly fol86 sociology. . .materialism lowed the tradition of distinguishing between the "real" (the eraprirical) and the metaphysical. since any question relating to "philosophy of science" was of the metaphysical realm, it obviously fell outside of sociology proper. inasmuch as positivist sociology dominated the field, such issues were non-issues because they were defined as non-sociological, however as different philosophies of science appear within sociology, they not only challenge the dominant positivist philosophy of science , but they also reintroduce philosophy into sociology. they reintroduce at the heart of sociological theory such "philosophical" debates as the identification of competing philosophies of science and their pervasive influence on sociology. iv. sociology and philosophy of science one recent attempt to systematically examine philosophy of science within modern sociology is that of keat and urry (1975) social theory as science . they identify three main philosophies: positivist, realist, 11 and conventionalist. although they present a lengthy discussion of these philosophies, numerous writers have commented briefly on various aspects. we shall use keat and urry's effort as the general approach to the issue of philosophy of science in sociology, referring to other works when appropriate. the major aspects of each philosophy will be presented with cursory remarks on sociology. a) positivism positivist sociologists have not written very much recently on 12 positivism. most who write, do not share its philosophy, namely phenomenologists (smart 1976; filraer et al 1972) and realists (keat and urry 1975)* the features which are usually stressed include the following. 87 alternate routes naturalism i in positivlst sociology, naturalism refers to the belief that social and natural phenomena are not qualitatively different. consequently, the methods, techniques and approaches of the natural sciences are directly transposable to the social sciences (thorns 1976:10; lally in thorns 19?6:55)» ®ne °f the strongest advocates of this position was lundberg (keat and urry 1975*91 )• unity of science ! if social and natural phenomena are scientifically similar, then the development of a unity of science follows quite naturally. all sciences are progressing towards a greater synthesis of knowledge where sciences will eventually lose their arbitrary boundaries and become one (kolakowskl 1968 «8). some sociologists prefer a weaker view of science developing gradually but not necessarily reaching that particular outcome. two views of this development exist (keat and urry 1975»24). science either develops through accumulation of facts, increasing accuracy of information, and development of increasingly more general theories, in the inductivist view; or sporadically as new theories are discovered and empirically tested. in this "hypothetico-deductivist" view, not all new theories are empirically acceptable, thus making scientific progress unsteady. regardless of the approach preferred, all > would agree to the fundamental unity of logic and methodology which underlies all sciences and which relates to the naturalism mentioned above. phenomenalism : if such unity exists, it is because all sciences define reality in the same way. for positivists, what is real, factual and scientifically acceptable as knowledge is observable. thus no distinction is drawn between essence and phenomenon. what cannot be perceived through sensory experience belongs to the realm of philosophy 88 sociology. . .materialism and the metaphysical (kolakowski 196qtk). all other forms of knowledge other than empirical observation are rejected as unscientific, and all knowledge which claims a distinction between the essence of an object and its observable manifestation is rejected as metaphysical fabrication. nominalism t kolakowski (1968«5) relates this label to the idea that scientific knowledge must rest an real concrete objects. this requires two different kinds of statements and languages: one observational, 13 the other theoretical. keat and urry (1975? 18) refer to the "ontological and eplstemological privilege" of observational language, that is only the observational language is accepted by positivists as having real referents in the physical world. as a result, epistemologically, terms in this language have the greatest truth, or the highest degree of certainty to them. theory neutrality ? it follows from the above that the observational language is theory neutral since it refers to real, actual things. thus this language can be verified as being true or false without referring to theory (keat and urry 1975s 19). the same does not apply to theoretical language since its truth or accuracy can only be assessed in reference to observational terms. another aspect to theory neutrality which also relates to phenomenalism, is its application to facts. facts are seen as being theory neutral or theory independant. all can agree on the facts, it is the interpretations of facts (theory) which is problematic. value neutrality t not only are facts theory and value neutral but scientific knowledge is also value neutral (thorns 1976il0;5?). the question is not simply the rejection of values and beliefs as a source of knowledge, but rather seeing the whole scientific enterprise as being 89 alternate routes objective and free of values. this gave rise to the debate on value ik free sociology, based largely on a misinterpretation of weber , propagated by the influential parsons (zeitlin 1973*58). although today few would support the extreme position of seeing all sociology as value free, «uch difficulty remains in determining the demarcation between objective value free knowledge and value based interpretation. correspondence rules i the separation of theory from facts in all positivist social sciences raises the problem of relating the "ontologically and epistemologically privileged" language to the inferior theore15 tical language . the translation of one to the other requires increasingly complex rules, detailed and complex operationalizations, an ever greater number of indicators and statistical tests of indicators to overcome the problem. yet, the problem always remains! are the concepts and theoretical terms accurately translated into observational language, or is some vitally crucial element left out? theory t keat and urry (1975*13-16) claim that for positivists, theories are simply sets of highly general universal statements to be empirically verified through observation and experiment. few positivists 16 today would argue for conclusively proving theories. consequently two partial solutions have been developed. confirmationiots argue for strengthening a theory by empirically validating applications of it, while falsificationists hold that a theory is strengthened by proving competing theories to be false (hypothetico-deductive method). both accept empirical research as the objective basis for science, and both believe that theories which are accepted are "universal statements about regular contingent relationships in nature" (keat and urry 1975' 16). on the other hand, positivists see models simply as heuristic aids which 90 sociology. . .material ism help one to understand a theory. but such analogies and representations are nothing more than psychological crutches to assist understanding, and have nothing to do with knowledge as such (keat and urry 1975523). conservaism > a criticism raised especially by the frankfurt school is that positivist sociology leads to the acceptance of the status quo since it rejects any non-empirical knowledge as being non-scientific (keat and urryl 975*220). since this sociology is concerned with society the way it is rather than the way it could or should be, it leads to political conservatism. or as stinchcombe (1968:91 ) described it in terms of functionalism: its conservatism consists of "... a feeling that... homeostatic variables constitute a list of good things about societies and that focusing on the positive consequences of existing institutions tends in a conservative direction" both are partly correct. at best positivism leads to reformism. but conservatism inherent in positivism originates mostly in its ontology phenomenalism requires positivists to accept phenomena at face value. as a result fetishes are accepted a real, rather than as a facade for an underlying reality. examples of this are seeing the market in economics and elections in political science or political sociology as alldetermining. stinchcombe (1968:91 ) for example accepts these statements as facts. such beliefs correspond with 19th century liberal-democratic ideology, the ideological counterpart to positivism. but to explain positivist conservatism simply by its ideology or by "feelings" is to overlook its primary source: its ontology. one is tempted to transform hegel's proposition: "what is rational is actual and what is actual is rational? (bender 1975«15) to read:"what is observable is, what is, is observable" for kolakowski (1968:204) this phenomenalism and the dorai91 alternate routes nant value system together explain the posltlvists' tendency to favour parliamentary democracy as, at most, social democrats. causal theory t one final, but essential feature of positivism is its humean regularity theory of causation. for posltlvists, science is an attempt to develop knowledge which permits prediction and explanation of events in the world. this is done by constructing general theories expressing regular relationships that research demonstrates actually exist. for posltlvists, ability to predict such relationships also comprises ability to explain. causes are explained by regularities rather than by logical or natural necessity. the same applies to explanations of events using j.s.mills'set of conditions, where no one condition alone is sufficient. according to keat and urry (197501-2) this set of conditions is still founded on a regularity theory since no distinction is made between necessary and sufficient conditions. although other aspects of positivist sociology could be indicated, the above points lead us to conclude that the comtian distinction between philosophy and science has prevented positivists from identifying philosophy in their own science. thus most fail to see that the assumption of dealing only with empirically based knowledge is itself part of a philosophy of science, part of a belief system. or, in kolakowski's words i "...positivism is a normative attitude regulating how we are to use such terms as "knowledge',' "science',' "cognition" ... .(196813). keat and urry (1975*71-95) identify many sociologists, especially in the united states, as positivists. from comte, spencer and durkheim, they include merton, farsons, lundberg, cuttman, stouffer, bales, shils, to name a few. the sociological theories associated with this philosophy include structural-functionalism, symbolic interactionism, and 92 sociology. . .materialism exchange theory. however, apart from empirical studies related to these theories, many of the standard works on sociological theory are written from within this tradition. some are openly apologetic of one theory, such as lazarsfeld (1970) for structural-functionalism . others simply view all theory from the positivist perspective (ritzer 1975; cohen 1968; 17 18 19 elsenstadt and curelaru 1976 ; timasheff 1967 ; martindale 197^ ). to complete keat and urry, one could identify specifically which features above are included in each theory and its variants. certain theories and writers emphasise certain features only. also, as keat and urry recognize, these aspects can be accepted with varying degrees of strength. however, such questions go beyond the scope of this paper. b) realism since most sociology up to the 1969' s was positivist, very little realist sociology has been done. according to keat and urry (1975 '68) marx remains one of the few who has written systematically within this paradigm. this causes difficulties in maintaining a distinction between a realist philosophy of science and marxism (keat and urry 1975 '• 96). their comments can be grouped under naturalism; causal theory; ontology; and models. naturalism 1 both positivists and realists accept a reality external to man. however realists reject phenomenalism, and have a different theory of causation. consequently, realist naturalism includes an objective empirical world where science can discover non-positivist causal relationships. except for these points, the distinction which keat and urry make between realist naturalism and positivist naturalism is not very clear. 93 alternate routes causal theory i realists share with positivists a "conception of science as an empirically based, rational, and objective enterprise, the purpose of which is to provide us with a true explanatory and predictive knowledge of nature." (keat and urry 1975*5) • however realists differentiate between prediction and explanation of nature, and insist the latter should be science's prime concern. to explain a phenomenon means to discover its natural cause. a realist explanation consists in discovering a "regular relationship between phenomena, and some kind of mechanism that links them. this requires knowledge of the underlying structures that are present, and the manner in which they generate or produce the phenomenon to be explained." (keat and urry 1975o0). much importance is attached to explanation because realists reject the humean regularity theory of causation in favour of a natural causal theory. phenomena have natural or real causes. prediction of future events on the basis of past regularities does not reveal or explain the actual cause of such events. such explanations require the other elements of the realist philosophy of science. theories i the main objective of theory is to explain; to provide a description of a regular relationship and its underlying cause of structure. theory is an attempt to actually describe reality. this reality includes the phenomenon to be explained, the underlying structures and mechanisms which generate the phenomenon, and an explanation of how the latter generate the former (keat and urry 197502-6). ontology : realist ontology differs from the positivist one in at least two important aspects. first, realists reject positivist phenomenalism. a distinction is drawn between the true object or its 94 sociology. . .materialism essence, and its phenomenon or appearance. since such "natures" are not open to direct observation, positivists relegate them to the "metaphysical realm", the realm of the scientifically unprovable. for realists, objects have underlying "natures" which are disguised behind observable manifestations, but which can also be perceived through their effects on other phenomena. another aspect to be considered is that unlike positivists, no distinction is made between observational and theoretical language. no ontological privilege is given to observational language since theoretical terms presumably refer to real facts. thus realists avoid the problem of correspondence rules which plague positivists. realists argue that terms cannot be classified by the positivist dichotomy observational/theoretical, because many terms are both. it is assumed that if terms are relatively unproblematic at the observational level, they remain unproblematic at the theoretical level. terms can also be defined by means of analogies from some already understood term. since both observational and theoretical terms have ontological value, theories become actual descriptions of social reality. thus they are not simply generalizations, heuristic devices, or abstract conjectures. theoretical terms refer to real things which are explained by theories describing the true nature of the phenomenon, and the underlying structures and mechanisms that are its natural cause. science progresses inasmuch as theories and terms become increasingly accurate and precise descriptions of social or natural reality (keat and urry 197508-44). models t realists see models as a relatively early stage in the 95 alternate routes process of developing a theory. models are analogies drawn from known phenomena to unknown and often unobservable phenomena. "models are of a subject and modelled on a source." (keat and urry 1975* 33 )• thus an analogy is drawn from the underlying structures and mechanism of a known case or similar phenomenon (source of the model) to those of the phenomenon to be explained (subject of the model). as such •odels are attempts to describe underlying structures and mechanisms, and since these are accepted as real, models become a description of actually existing entities and relations. one of the main activities of scientific research is to extend these models in empirically testable form and test them. in this respect, positivists would argue realists are doing hypothesis testing. but such model testing refers to real natural causal relationships rather than generalizations from empirical observation of regularities. keat and urry (197 5o^) indicate differences in positivist and realist ontological premises resulting not only in different uses for models, but in altogether different conceptions of models. positivists develop models by "a process of abstraction and idealization of the concrete." for realists, "abstraction and idealization are involved in the relationship between the elements of the model and the essence that it represents" (keat and urry 1975«135). ttiese are essentially the main features which keat and urry associate with realism. as stated earlier, they identify marx as the only social scientist who consistently worked within a realist philosophy of science. a realist sociology has yet to develop. c) conventionalism the third philosophy of science which keat and urry (1975^6-66) 96 sociology. . .materialism discuss is conventionalism. arising mostly out of german phenomenology and american pragmatism, it can be traced mostly through husserl, schutz (smart 1976:ch.3), bretano and max scheler .(ritzer 1975:103; zeitlin 1 973 i 167-170) and partly through max weber (zeitlin 1 973 « 1 67-170 ) and marxism (smart 19?6s 115-1^-9; zeitlin 1973:167-170). there exist few attempts to identify the main features of its philosophy of science, apart from keat and urry (l975s46-65), but these seem fragmentary and incomplete (lally in thorns 197 61 62 5 turner 1978; 395-402; ritzer 1975»109-112). the main aspects usually include antinaturalism, "value partiality1 ,' and relativity. anti-naturalism : unlike positivists and realists, conventionalists reject the idea that an "objective social reality exists independent of knowing human subjects" (lally in thorns 1976:59). in its most extreme form of idealism, only the image or ideas man develops of reality are seen as real. today, most would accept a modified version which calls for a shift of emphasis from the material objective world to the subjective world of consciousness. most agree that the former exists, but argue that knowledge of the world depends on man's consciousness. universal empirical knowledge is not possible because all knowledge is based on a system of beliefs (keat and urry 1975:142-144). since all science carries varying elements of subjectivity, the focus of science is not objective reality but rather the manner in which man makes sense, establishes order and gives meaning to the world in which he lives. this idea can be expanded by looking at other features of this philosophy . value partiality : i suggest this term as an opposite to "value neutrality" so as to regroup a number of aspects. first it means that theory neutral facts are not possible. that people agree on a given 97 alternate routes fact simply indicates that they share the same meaning system for evaluating or identifying facts. perception is influenced by, if not a reflection of, values, ideas, and general knowledge. consequently definition and even perception of the objective world depends on one's perception of the world. since data on facts are value laden, scientific knowledge becomes simply a system of symbols for making sense of the world. as such scientific theories have no precedence over other meaning systems. also, scientific theories and science as a whole requires study and explanation just as any other system of knowledge (turner 1978 :42l). implicit in this is rejection of the positivist "unity of science" and "theory neutrality of observational language" if facts are theory laden so is the language used to describe them. the frankfurt school goes further than most, claiming that science not only can not, but should not be value neutral (lally in thorns 1976:67). social science should be programmatic. it should seek to change society in regards not only to social problems, but to the very structure of society, so as to overcome fundamental problems such as alienation. rejection of value neutrality has other implications which can be regrouped under the following heading. relativity : implicit in conventionalist ontology is the notion that theories cannot be empirically verified. today few argue for a definitive or conclusive proof or disproof of a theory. most argue for varying degrees of confirmation. the problem that this raises is the development of criteria for choosing between theories. keat and urry (1975:^9) indicate lakatos' solution of abandoning a theory only if an alternate theory explains all the first one explained, and still 98 sociology. . .material ism generates predictions not derivable from" the first theory, "some of which have been confirmed by empirical testing" . however this solution rests on the assumption of value neutrality of facts and theories. all approaches seeking to compare theories, either for evaluation or syntheses, assume the possibility of translating the observations, concepts, and"facts" of both theories into a common language . (keat and urry 1975'50)» conventionalists argue that even a theory neutral observational language is not possible. theory affects perception and definition of data. consequently it is not possible to rationally compare or evaluate their explantory powers. this brings us back to kuhn, discussed earlier, and his claim that all methodological standards and . rules are paradigm dependent. for conventionalists, theories and observations always include a subjective element, either of the researcher directly involved, or within the larger scientific community which developed and supports a particular theory and method of observation. even if facts could be objectively determined, there could always be more than one explanatory hypothesis, and the one to be chosen as true or better, cannot be determined by experience (kolakowski 1968:1^3). thus rejection of value neutrality of facts and scientific knowledge result in relativity in theory, methodology and substantive knowledge. everything becomes relative to the meaning system of which it is a part. if positivist sociology seeks to disembody itself from philosophy, conventionalism seeks its integration. for positivists, the conventionalist emphasis on man's consciousness automatically places all such sociology in the metaphysical realm. however, keat and urry argue that the issue is not science versus philosophy, but rather conflicting philosophies 99 alternate routes of science. thus they identify schutz' phenomenology (1&j-5), levistrauss' structuralism (l?3-^) and the frankfurt school with marcuse and adorno (218-221) as conventionalist social theories. again one can elaborate considerably on the specific philosophical premisses of the major works related to these theories. y sociology and materialism the main argument which underlies this paper is the need for philosophy to understand social theory. some of the errors and difficulties of discussing social theory without philosophy were demonstrated. these include superficial synthese and taxonomies of theories which compound confusion rather than enlighten. i also indicated the inadequacies of including only a simple awareness of some of the underlying assumptions to theories. vhat is needed are systematic discussions and expositions of philosophical traditions and premisses ingrained into social theory. one such exposition, that of keat and urry, as supported by others, was presented. their effort could be expanded substantially. it can no doubt be challenged on numerous points, especially the lack of sufficient distinction between the realist and the positivist philosophies. their work is far from final, but at least it gives some idea as to the nature of the exercise, an exercise which seems totally alien to the writers mentioned in the first part of the paper. the problem so far appears to be philosophical: the discovery and identification of philosophical underpinnings in theory formulation, and their effect on empirical research. thus the problem can be defined as one of competing philosophies of science which provide legitimation for non-positivist sociology. it is an attempt to expand the definition 100 sociology. . .materialism of "science" so that non-positivist sociologists will have their work accepted, or at least tolerated, as "science" within the social science community. as long as non-positivists have to prove the scientificity of their work according to the canons and criteria of established sociology, they face the choice of distorting their work into variants of 20 the dominant paradigm , or having it rejected as un-scientific. the scientificity of non-positivist sociology cannot be demonstrated on the basis of positivist canons. so, philosophy of science not only justifies and legitimates non-positivist sociology, but even challenges the dominant paradigm. one might then expect the conclusion of this paper to expand on this dimension. however, this definition of the problem can easily lead to theoretical relativity where empirical research and theory formulation are defended on the basis of competing notions of science. for keat and urry, this would be identified as a conventionalist argument, that of competing meaning systems. like kuhn, one can argue that alternate paradigms are challenging the dominant paradigm, and preparing the ground for a scientific revolution. these two positions of complete replacement of the dominant paradigm or of paradigm coexistence correspond to the strong and weak version of the same conventionalist argument. nevertheless, many sociologists will be more than happy to stop here. a few may wish to push their analysis further. if the notion of theoretical relativity outlined earlier is rejected, the problem has to be defined differently. it can be redefined as two very broad and general philosophical traditions, materialism and idealism. as long as the debate remains within idealist philosophy, the 101 alternate routes earlier definition of the problem is adequate and the suggested solution of greater tolerance for non-positivlst sociology is satisfactory. as a redefinition of the problem situates the debate outside idealism, philosophy of science becomes incomplete, inadequate. to redefine the problem as a materialist-idealist dichotomy, with the regrouping of conventionalism and positivism in the latter may appear simplistic at first glance. yet, even keat and urry (1975*63-5) and others (kolakowski 1968:15^-173; hollis and nells 1975sl53-l69) need a special category of "instrumentalism" or "pragmatism" for those who combine positivism and conventionalism. the materialism-idealism dichotomy involves a clash of mutually exclusive world views which are embodied in various philosophical traditions. allen (1975) althusser (i976 a) balibar (1978) and hoffman (1975) outline these world views, raising numerous points of which three are of particular significance to sociology. these indicate the direction the materialist-idealist debate would take in the discipline. the first point is historical materialism versus marxist social science. some academics attempt to discover or develope a marxian variant of their particular discipline. such marxist social sciences do not have to be invented or adapted from modified empiricism or phenomenology. marxist science already exists in historical materialism. it has its own framework and approach. however it transcends the artificial discipline boundaries of academia. as a result, marxist scholars attempting to do historical materialism are constantly challenged or hindered by these imaginary boundaries. many academics who try to develop historical materialism remain prisoners of these boundaries. a few examples such as smart and zeitlin were mentioned earlier, not 102 sociology. . .material ism to exclude the countless humanist and empiricist revisions of marx. in spite of marxist rhetoric, they deform marx's scientific discoveries (althusser 19?6a.:kl)t "sauf exception, ils sont encore aujourd'hui en train de bricoler en economie politique, en sociologie, en ethnologie, en anthropologic leurs theories, ce sont des vieilleries ideologiques, rajeunies a grand renfort de subtilites intellectuelles et de techniques mathematiques ultra-modemes." it isn't that sociology, or any social science, has nothing to contribute to marxism. rather they can contribute inasmuch as they share a common materialist philosophy and are incorporated into marxist science: hiaorical materialism. the second point is that the issue is not just one of finding a suitable and acceptable philosophy of science for marxism as keat and urry seem to suggest. making marxism academically acceptable is a very difficult problem for its practitioners. one solution is to use different philosophies of science to disguise dialectical materialism. to do so is to sneak marxism in through the back door. such a strategy, whether conscious or not, tends to weaken and dilute marxism. by seeking to make marxism academically acceptable in this fashion, the danger is very great that it will be transformed into a variant of the dominant conceptualizations of social science. one risks making it safe and uncritical. historical materialism has its philosophical base: dialectical materialism. there is no need to seek other philosophies to support it. what has to be defended is not philosophy of science but dialectical materialism. introducing a marxist world view into academia is not a purely intellectual exercise. as althusser (l976a:^2) explains: 103 alternate routes "lea conceptions du monde sont icpresentees dans le domaine de la theorie... par la phllosophie. la philosophie represente la lutte des classes dans la theorie. c'est pourquoi la philosophie est une lutte, et lutte fondamentalement politique: lutte de classe." superficially, the struggle in which marxist academics are involved is that of having historical materialism accepted as a science, and work done in historical materialism accepted as scientific. "ve therefore have the right and the duty to speak (as all the classics have done) of marxist theory, and within theory, of a science , and a philosophy. . .we must fight for the word science.." (althusser 19?6b:l6). at first glance this seems simple enough, but its simplicity is misleading for this task embodies what allen refers to as the class struggle between bourgeois and proletarian ideology(l975:42,53,231 ). getting historical materialism accepted by academia as a "science" involves a direct challenge of the dominant conception of science, the dominant parcelization of knowledge into arbitrary disciplines, and the dominant ideology as institutionalized into the academic community. therefore, it is not a question of competing philosophies of science, but rather class struggle in academia, which is our third point. the dominant paradigm reflects the ideological hegemony of the bourgeoisie in one particular ideological apparatus. the domination of the bourgeois ideology in academia accounts for the weakness of marxist science and theory. "or ce scandale theorique n'est pas du tout un scandale. c'est un effet de la lutte de ciasse ideologique: car c'est l'ideologie bourgeoise, la "culture" bourgeoise qui est au pouvoir, qui exerce "l'hegemonie" dans leur masse, les intellectuels communistes et marxistes, sont sauf exceptions, domines dans leur theorie par l'ideologie bourgeoise. sauf exceptions, les sciences humaines aussi." (althusser 19?6at4l) bourgeois ideological hegemony explains" the fact that they (scientists) most often present themselves in the terminology of marxism, "tinkering 104 sociology. . .materialism around" with and turning inside out its major theses" (balibar 1978»7). superficial use of marxist terminology and categories disguises "radical chic" bourgeois social science. it also confuses the issues involved whenever they appear. the struggle manifests itself in publishing, in hiring practises, in thesis committees, undergraduate papers, graduate exams, conferences and seminars; in every academic activity in which different conceptions of science clash as an expression of class struggle. this aspect of philosophy in sociology needs further elaboration, for class struggle in social theory is directly related to, and even a part of the proletarian class struggle. one simply has to compare the development of marxist studies where the proletarian movement is strong, in such countries as italy and france with that of english canada or the united states where it is weak. also, the relative autonomy of ideological apparatuses such as the university is crucial in explaining the current tolerance and even the need for a token marxist in each social science department of these "liberal" institutions. these are some fundamental aspects of philosophy as class struggle in the social sciences which a detailed analysis would have to include. the struggle is ideological but it is class struggle nevertheless, and it permeates the university. in conclusion, the problem is not simply that of identifying "philosophical underpinnings" in social theory, but rather that of replacing idealist philosophy with materialist philosophy. to do so is to challenge and weaken the dominant ideology as it exists in social science and as it is institutionalized within academia. 105 alternate routes conclusion the relationship between philosophy and sociological theory has been described in this paper as utterly lacking in much of the literature, and quite superficial in most of the rest. some of the resulting problems were indicated, as well as one attempt to use philosophy of science to overcome them. that competing philosophies of science tend to result in theoretical relativity forced the analysis one step further, to the materialism-idealism dichotomy. an easy criticism of this paper will be that these two world views, or conceptualizations have not been outlined. similarly the points of historical materialism, dialectical materialism, and class struggle in academia, especially in relation to sociology, were not fully elaborated. to reply by refering to one's sources is not very satisfactory. that these points in themselves provide more than* enough material for another lengthy paper is a partial excuse. after all, these points were presented simply to indicate the direction a more complete analysis should take. another partial answer is that many critics insist other people do the work for them. parading under different shades of radicalism, they display a chronic allergy to marxist classics and serious neoharxist literature. eager to attack numerous injustices in society, these "safe radicals" insist on constantly referring to theoretical models and approaches which, at their best, have never lead to anything but reformism. satisfied with diluted and eroded interpretations of marxist science, they are unable to penetrate beyond the intellectual barriers of the dominant paradigm. 106 sociology.. .materialism inasmuch as the university remains liberal, and bourgeois hegemony is not too threatened, either internally, or at the world level such as in recent events in africa, marxists can expect tokenism to continue. in liberal institutions, marxist philosophy and science can be defended. if conditions worsen, we can expect some replay of mccarthyite witchhunts, in a conservative setting, marxists will be lucky if they can get away with competing philosophies of science. 107 alternate routes footnotes 1. a full article could be written on this topic alone, illustrating the influence of hayek, hempel, and wittgenstein for example on sociologists. one is also reminded of the popper-adorno debate among others. t. kuhn's the structure of scientific revolutions has had a significant impact on sociology, of which certain aspects will be discussed in this paper. 2. for a lengthy discussion and marxist critique of the influence of kuhn and his use of the paradigm concept on sociology see allen (l975 : 3-66). 3. in reaction to reviewers, kuhn attempted to clarify his term by redefining the metaphysical level as a "disciplinary matrix',' a shared system of symbols, beliefs, models and values, which identify a scientific community (1970 i 176-186). the second level, he now refers to as exemplars which while being part of the matrix, are of a lower order. these provide models as examples from which solutions to current research problems can be drawn. the term "paradigm" could be retained for this level, according to kuhn (1970:186-190). 4,_ turner's use of the concept paradigm conforms closely to that of kuhn. also his account of sociological theory can correspond to kuhn's theory if one sees structural-functionalisra as a dominant paradigm carrying this discipline through a period of "normal science" over the last two generations or^so, and ethnomethodology as the emerging paradigm, in this "crisis of sociology". however this would be unfair to turner since his account has relatively little to do with kuhn's theory, depite the easy similarity. 5. allen (l975 :^2) is quite categorical on this point. he states that the only two conceptualizations of social reality possible are of static versus dynamic phenomenon. it is on either one of these two irreconcilable initial assumptions that various social theories are erected, adding further supporting assumptions as they develope. the premise of social reality as static phenomenon is so fundamental to accepted theories of social reality that practitioners hardly ever question it. according to allen, this initial premise is so pervasive that discussions usually remain at the level of secondary assumptions and differences. 6. for incisive reviews and critiques of gouldner's book, see shaw(l973) for a narxian perspective; and rhoads (1972) for a positivist proparsons perspective. 7. thorns (1976) presents a collection of essays which address such questions. although most of the authors reveal their positivist training, they indicate at least an awareness that ethnomethodology and althusser, for example, are not simply branch offs from normal sociology". 8. an interesting example of one who discusses some crucial differences between phenomenology and positivist empiricist sociology and yetcan not resist the urge to call for merging these two approaches is thorns (1976:161-177). less remarkable examples are ritzer (1975; and catton (in thorns 1976:25-52). 108 sociology. . .materialism 9. van den berghe (196?) claims to synthesize marx and structural-functionalism. in fact he synthesizes an empiricist reading of marx with an equally empiricist structural-functionalism. the same argument applies to smart (l9?6) with phenomenology and marx, and zeitlin (1973) with marx and social psychology. for critiques of such facile syntheses, see applebaum (1978) and swingewood (l970). 10. turner ( 1978:21-22) makes much the same statement regarding comte and the separation of philosophy from sociology. 11. bhaskar(l975) refers to these as: empirical realism, transcendental realism, and transcendental idealism. bhaskar does not explore sociology as such, but presents a systematic analysis of these philosophies of science. 12. turner (1978:393) for example identifies three features to positivist sociology. these could be labelled phenomenalism, unity of science and nominalism. however his description is in such general terms that it could apply to more than one philosophy of science. more accurate summaries of positivism are found in thorns (l976:9-22;55_75; bottomore 1975*9; giddens 1974:2-8). kolakowski (1968) presents an excellent elaboration of positivist philosophy. giddens (1974) presents an interesting collection of articles by phenomenologists and critical theorists, against the positivism which he defends in the introduction. 13. hollis and nells (1975:4-10) identify these as synthetic and analytic statements, in economics. the major part of their book is a criticism of positivist separation of fact from theory, which provides the basis for a sustained criticism of neo-classical theory in economics. 14. for an excellent discussion of weber's position, and of some objections to it, see keat and urry (1975:196-204). 15. for a detailed analysis of the problems positivist economists face in developing correspondence rules, see hollis and nells (1975 '89-1 06). keat and urry (l975:20-22;l60-l) address this problem in social science in general, and in sociology in particular. 16. this aspect of theory verification is referred to as the "logical problem of induction" (keat and urry 1975'-15) or the "inductive problem" (hollis and nells 1975:11 ).c the problem is essentially that of predicting future outcomes on the basis of past experience. to do so is to go beyond knowledge provided by observation. for an excellent elaboration of this problem, that of correspondence rules, and the necessity for hypothesis testing as the only road to cumulative knowledge, by a positivist sociologist, see zetterberg (1954). 17. one of the most recent efforts at systematically exposing sociological theory is that of eisenstadt and curelaru. true to the positivist tradition, they seek to demonstrate the convergence of sociological theory since its inception by confucius and aristotle, as developed by the founding fathers (marx, durkheim, .etc.) not only in europe and in the 109 alternate routes ^£i ^"shout the world. (the index lists three continents ibcountries plus "conununist bloc" and "scandanavia" . ) however the n£lt? "^ the t^ h0rs face in this ^tensive caklo^e (footnotes ™%l) , ^"j ^^^ material" accounts for alsst so or thej?5 pages) is the fact that much of the literature refers to a "cri^»in sociology. recalling that cries of "crisis" generall? si™ important breakthroughs (preface iv) the^thov^^siin ^scribing the major paradigms, theories, and counter-msels and is ^mlltl^f their b f° ad^tellectual and instit^tiotl fra^em^'etesfsf+f t^le r° n^bendlx and lip3efs explanation ofmarx stratification theory (25) they are able to discover under all 2o^er er flt:h and dlscorf e n^. a -nimng thrust. "in one w^y or s svilstxius^flv^r^:^^"/11^5561 t0 marcuse phenomenology +!l tr 4 , ? / accepted or incorporated the basic premisses ofthe sociological tradition as developed by toennies, weber and scntim thl^n's; ui fs *" the st™tural-functional model and its varies"thus in the crucible of positivism, all contradictory theor varleties molten and after discarding some slag, a new alloy forms! with its arit^lf 1111 , 5 ? ^k' "* lts expla-tory power so overwentas to propel sociology beyond the narrow confines of present knowledgetowards uncharted galaxies of empirical reality. present *™»ledge 18. a somewhat older account of the origins and development of sociological theory, timasheff is as much a positivist as eisenstadt. for example, he spends four chapters on comte, spencer, durkheim and weber (total 53 pages) for three pages on marx. although number of pages is a weak indicator, he does label marx as "economic determinism" (^8 ) and phenomenology as "philosophical sociology" (ch. 21 ). 19. martindale (197*0 presents an interesting taxonomy based on the history of philosophy. his eight cell typology can accommodate any theory. however, since the whole typology is so abstract and general, and since martindale actually refers to very few exemplars, it remains a hasty sketch in need of a more thorough foundation even if it were an accurate reflection of sociological theory. 20. as demonstrated in the first part of the paper, the term "paradigm" is quite ambiguous for sociologists. in this context, i use the term in the sense of a body of theories which share the same philosophy of science. for now, i am using keat and urry's three philosophies of science as being relevant for sociology, and with positivist philosophy as being the dominant one. 110 sociology. . .materialism bibliography allen, v.l.; s ocial analysis: a marxist critique and alternative ; london: longman, 1975. alford, robert; "paradigms of relations between state and society" in lindberg, leon (ed) stress and contradiction of modern capitalism ; lexington, mass.: heath and co.; 1975. althusser, louis; positions 1964 1975 ; paris: editions sociales ,1976. ; essays in self criticism ; london: new left books, 1976. appelbaum, richard, "marx's theory of the falling rate of profit" american sociological review ; vol. 43, 1978 (67 80). balibar, e.; "positivism and irrational thought" new left books ; no. 107, january-february, 1978 (3-18). barnes, barry; scientific knowledge and sociological theory ; london: routledge and kegan paul, 1974. bender, frederic; the betrayal of marx ; new york: harper torchbooks, 1975, bhaskar, roy; a realist theory of social science ; leeds england: leeds books, 1975. ; "feyerabend and bachelard: two philosophies of science"; new left review ; no. 94, nov. -dec. 1975 (31-55). brown, richard; a poetic for sociology ; cambridge: cambridge unfversity press, 1977. cohen, percy; modern social theory ; london: heinemann, 1968. eisenstadt, s.n. ,curelaru, m. ; the form of sociology paradigms and crises ; new york: john wiley and sons; 1976. etzioni, amitai; social change: sources, patterns and consequences ; new york: basic books, 1973. filmer, paul (et al ) ; new directions in sociology ; london: collier macmillan, 1972. freund, julien; "methodologie et epistemologie comparees d'emile durkheim, vilfredo pareto, et max weber"; recherches sociologiques , vol. 5, 1974 (282-309). goertzel, ted g.; political society ; chicago: rand mcnally college pub. co.; 1976 gouldner, alvin; the coming crisis of western sociology ; new york basic books, 1970. ill alternate routes harre, rom and madden, e.h.; causal powers: a theory of natural necessity ; oxford: basil blackwell, 1975. hoffman, john; marxism and the theory of praxis ; london: lawrence and wishart, 1975. hollis, martin, nells, edward; rational economic man ; london: cambridge university press, 1975. keat, russel and urry , john; social theory as science ; london: routledge and kegan paul ltd., 1975. kolakowski , leszek; "althusser's marx" in the socialist register , (111-128); 1971. ; the alienation of reason; new york: doubleday and co. inc. 1968. ; toward a marxist humanism; new york: grove press inc., 1968. kuhn, thomas; the structure of scientific revolutions ; chicago: university of chicago press, 1970. lazarsfelo, p.f.; main trends in sociology ; new york: harper torchbooks, 1970. marcuse, herbert; studies in critical philosophy ; london: new left books ,1972. ; reason and revolution ; london: routledge and kegan paul ltd.; 1955 (orig. 194tt marti ndale, don; sociological theory and the problem of values ; columbia, ohio: charles e. merrill, 1974. mehan, hugh, wood, h.; the reality of ethnomethodology ; new york: john wiley and sons ; 1975. merton, robert k.; social theory and social structure ; new york: the free press, 1968. oestereicher, emil; consciousness and social action, towards a structural dialectical conceptualization of action and thought ; ph.d. thesis; university of illinois: urbana illinois, 1968. parsons, talcott; the system of modern societies ; englewood cliff, n.j.: prentice hall , 1971 . rhoads, john; "on gouldner's crisis of western society"; american journal of sociology ; no. 78, 1972, (136-153). ritzer, george; sociology as a multiple paradigm science ; boston: ally and bacon inc. ; 1975. 112 sociology. . .materialism shaw, m.; "the coming crisis of radical sociology" in r. blackburn: ideology in social science ; bungay, suffolk: the chaucer press, (32-44). 1972. smart, barry; sociology, phenomenology and marxian analysis ; london: routledge and kegan paul ltd., 1976. stinchcombe, arthur; constructing social theories ; new york: harcourt brace and world inc.; 1968. swin6ew00d, alan; "comte , marx and political economy" sociological review , vol. 18, 1970 (335-349). thorns, david (ed); new directions in sociology ; london: david and charles; 1976. timasheff, nicholas; sociological theory ; new york: random house, 1967. turner, jonathan; the structure of sociological theory ; homewood, illinois: the dorsey press; 1978, revised. van den berghe, pierre; "dialectic and functionalism: toward a theoretical synthesis"; american sociological review ; no. 28, 1963; (695-705) walter, wallace; the logic of science in sociology ; chicago: aldine atherton; 1971. zeitlin, irving; rethinking sociology, a critique of comtemporary sociology ; new york: appleton century crafts; 1973. zetterberg, hans; on theory verification in sociology ; totowa, n.j.: bedminster press; 1963. 113 great recession-proof? shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism 2013 alternate routes edited by: carlo fanelli & bryan evans g reat recession-proof? carlo fanelli & bryan evans great recession-proof? shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism 2013 alternate routes edited by: carlo fanelli & bryan evans g reat recession-proof? carlo fanelli & bryan evans great recession-proof? shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism 2013 alternate routes edited by: carlo fanelli & bryan evans g reat recession-proof? carlo fanelli & bryan evans © red quill books ltd. 2013 ottawa www.redquillbooks.com isbn 978-1-926958-24-8 printed on acid-free paper. the paper used in this book incorporates post-consumer waste and has not been sourced from endangered old growth forests, forests of exceptional conservation value or the amazon basin. red quill books subscribes to a one-book-at-a-time manufacturing process that substantially lessens supply chain waste, reduces greenhouse emissions, and conserves valuable natural resources. includes bibliographical references. isbn 978-1-926958-24-8 also published as a serial: “alternate routes” issn 1923-7081 (online) issn 0702-8865 (print) red quill books is an alternative publishing house. proceeds from the sale of this book will support future critical scholarship. alternate routes: a journal of critical social research volume 24, 2013 editors: carlo fanelli and bryan evans book review editors: priscillia lefebvre and nicolas carrier editorial board: nahla abdo, pat armstrong, david camfield, nicolas carrier, wallace clement, simten cosar, simon dalby, aaron doyle, ann duffy, bryan mitchell evans, luis fernandez, randall germain, peter gose, alan hunt, paul kellogg, jacqueline kennelly, mark neocleous, mi park, georgios papanicolaou, justin paulson, garry potter, stephanie ross, herman rosenfeld, george s. rigakos, heidi rimke, arne christoph ruckert, alan sears, mitu sengupta, donald swartz, ingo schmidt, toby sanger, janet lee siltanen, susan jane spronk, mark p. thomas, rosemary warskett. journal mandate established in 1977 at the department of sociology and anthropology, carleton university, alternate routes’ central mandate has been to create outlets for critical social research and interdisciplinary inquiry. a scholarly peer-reviewed annual, ar works closely with labour and social justice activists to promote the publication of non-traditional, provocative and radical analyses that may not find a forum in conventional academic venues. ar seeks to be a public academic journal and encourages submissions that advance or challenge theoretical, historical and contemporary socio-political, economic and cultural issues. in addition to full-length articles, we welcome review essays sparked by previously published material, interviews, short commentaries, as well as poetry, drawings and photos. ar publishes primarily special-themed issues and therefore requests that submissions be related to the current call for papers. submissions must be free of racist and sexist language, have limited technical or specialized terms and be written in a style that is accessible to our diverse readership. 4 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism table of contents | 5 table of contents introduction from great recession to great deception: reimagining the roots of the crisis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 —carlo fanelli and bryan evans articles 1. the myth of canadian exceptionalism: crisis, non-recovery, and austerity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 —jim stanford 2. crisis and opportunism: public finance trends from stimulus to austerity in canada . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 —christopher stoney and tamara krawchenko 3. canada’s conservative class war: using austerity to squeeze labour at the expense of economic growth. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59 —toby sanger 4. stabilizing privatization: crisis, enabling fields, and public-private partnerships in canada. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85 —heather whiteside 5. when resistance isn’t futile: understanding canadian labour’s fight for decent pensions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109 —joel davidson harden 6. what is trade union bureaucracy? a theoretical account . . . 133 —david camfield interventions 1. social property relations in the 21st century: an interview with ellen meiksins wood . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 159 —jordy cummings 2. twenty-first century socialism and the global financial meltdown: in conversation with michael lebowitz . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 171 —rebekah wetmore and ryan romard 3. neoliberalization and the matrix of action: in conversation with neil brenner, jamie peck, and nik theodore . . . . . . . . . 183 —peter brogan 6 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism 4. austerity is bad for our health: gender and distributional impacts of ontario’s 2012 budget . . . . . . . . . . . 199 —shelia block 5. austerity and aboriginal communities: an interview with david newhouse . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 207 —carlo fanelli 6. climate change and crisis: in dialogue with simon dalby . . . 215 —jen wrye 7. the electro-motive lockout and non-occupation: what did we lose? what can we learn? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 220 —herman rosenfeld 8. beyond the economic crisis: this crisis in trade unionism. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 236 —sam gindin reviews 1. christine pich —whitmore, elizabeth, et al. “activism that works.”. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 248 2. natalie spagnuolo —engler, yves. “canada and israel: building apartheid”. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 252 3. jillian l. curtin —toussaint, eric and damien millet. “debt, the imf and the world bank: sixty questions, sixty answers. . . 255 4. kevin partridge —hill, gord. “500 years of indigenous resistance.” . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 258 5. tiffany hall —frölich, paul. “rosa luxemburg: ideas in action.” 261 6. james braun —tully, john. “the devil’s milk: a social history of rubber.” . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 264 7. rebekah wetmore —brouwer, steve. “revolutionary doctors: how venezuela and cuba and changing the world’s conception of health care.” . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 267 8. naomi alisa calnitsky —cockcroft, james. “mexico’s revolution then and now.” . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 270 9. rania tfaily —ruben, albert. “the people’s lawyer.” . . . . . . . . . . 273 10. sabrina fernandes —dwyer, augusta. “broke but unbroken: grassroots social movements and their radical solutions to poverty.” . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 276 editorial introduction from great recession to great deception: reimagining the roots of the crisis —carlo fanelli and bryan evans on march 23, 2012, alternate routes in conjunction with carleton university and ryerson university’s centre for labour-management relations hosted the conference: the global economic crisis and canada: perception versus reality. the original call for papers which inspired the event and later this issue, stated: “it is now broadly recognized that the global economic crisis that struck in late 2007 is by far the most significant and wide-ranging since the depression years of the 1930s. while there have been signs of tepid recovery over the last five years, the international monetary fund (2011, p.xv) has recently warned that “[t]he global economy is in a dangerous new phase. global activity has weakened and become more uneven, confidence has fallen sharply recently, and downside risks are growing...thus, the structural problems facing recessionhit economies have proven more intractable than expected, and the process of devising and implementing reforms more complicated.” given fears of an ongoing recession, particularly as a result of europe’s sovereign debt crisis and a record level u.s. budget deficit, the global recession that struck in 2007 is by no means over. “in canada, however, the economic downturn has been shorter and milder than many of its g7 counterparts. in fact, according to statistics canada, while the canadian economy began contracting in the fourth quarter of 2008 by the third quarter of 2009 the recession had already passed. indeed, the great recession is allegedly no greater than previous slumps such as those in the early 1980s and 1990s as measured by job losses, home sales, bankruptcies, credit availability and consumer spending (cross, 2011). but numbers rarely, if ever, tell the whole story. federal, provincial and local governments across the country, regardless of political stripes, are turning to a range of austerity measures that will erode public services and the quality of public sector employment. it is also being demanded that private sector workers take pay and benefit cuts.” 8 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism despite official pronouncements suggesting a recovery is well underway, the articles and interviews collected here problematize prevailing characterizations of recession and recovery. rather than focusing on narrowly economistic measures, contributors challenge standard explanations of the great recession drawing attention to the multifaceted socio-political, ethno-racial and gendered dimensions of austerity and retrenchment. furthermore, instead of glossing over or ignoring the capitalist context that leaves workers dependent on the imperatives of capital, the analyses collected here take seriously the inherently antagonistic class relations that structure our daily lives. the challenge, as we saw it, was to bring together contributors who considered the uneven and often contradictory impacts of recession that stretch across the canadian political economic landscape. we are confident that the voices presented in this edition of ar have made a serious contribution to that objective. as the 2008 global economic slump made its way to canada, the initial response by the federal conservatives to a deteriorating economic climate was one of confusion and denial. in the midst of the 2008 general election p.m. harper suggested that there were some great buying opportunities in the stock market, while his finance minister, jim flaherty, insisted that canada would not run a deficit. six months later the deficit was estimated to be roughly $50 billion (laxer, 2009). despite dubious financial advice and eyebrow-raising budgetary forecasting, the conservatives have since gone on to win a majority government in 2011. like their counterparts across the provinces, most notably in ontario, alberta, and nova scotia —each province having elected a different political party —austerity and attacks against public services and unionized workers has been established as the orthodox policy response. needless to say, the shape taken by struggles over austerity and the protection of public services may well determine whether (neoliberal) capitalism continues uninterrupted or, alternatively, whether something new and historically unique can capture the public’s imagination. before introducing the articles presented here, however, we found it necessary to bring attention to what we are calling the great deception. it is plain to see that the assault on trade union rights and freedoms, the public provision of social services and working class standards of living are currently under attack and will remain so indefinitely.1 while austerity has been the buzzword of the last five years, when considered in historical perspective it is clear that 1 parts of this section are drawn from fanelli, 2012 editorial introduction from great recession to great deception | 9 canadians have been living with varying degrees of austerity for at least the last three decades (mcbride and shields, 1997; panitch and swartz, 2003). in this sense, public services and collective bargaining have been gradually eroded over an otherwise “permanent era of austerity” (evans and albo, 2010). the severity of the great recession has merely intensified and given impetus to long-term efforts to undermine the public production and delivery of public services and reduce workers’ ability to chart a path independent from the vagaries of capital. indeed, democracy in the workplace, understood as the ability of workers to have a say over how and what gets made, under what conditions and what rewards, are proving increasingly incompatible with the logic of capitalist development. since the 1980s, there has been a slow but steady downward convergence in working conditions and wages, backed by employer and state efforts to lower working class expectations. these efforts have been in combination with unprecedented amounts of personal affluence among certain groups in the midst of public sector austerity. . as the great recession recedes from public scrutiny in canada, its aftereffects continue to frame political debate and strain public finances. despite the public treasury bailing-out corporations, supplying new subsidies, lowering corporate taxes, and increasing state spending in order to counter the recession, the banks and capitalist classes continue to demand public sector austerity. emphasis has increasingly moved away from a critical investigation into the historical origins and root causes of the recession, excessive executive compensation, and even inquiries into the nature of capitalism to an emphasis on cutting public services and attacking those who produce, deliver and use those services, the poor, the elderly, and beyond. in our view, the redefinition of the crisis as stemming from a bloated and inefficient public sector and unionized workers’ wages more broadly, can be understood as nothing less than a great deception. this is not to imply that those who believe that the public sector is wasteful and unproductive are duped or foolish, nor to suggest that the public sector is uniformly a beacon of efficiency (since efficiency itself is a politically loaded phrase that often obscures more than it reveals), but to draw attention to the purposeful attempt to obfuscate, confuse, muddy, mislead and deflect critical inquiry away from a social and economic system —capitalism —that not only caused the crisis but constrains the scope for change. the essays collected here ensure that such a deception does not go unnoticed. 10 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism while greater detail is beyond the purview of this short editorial introduction and issue in its entirety, it is our contention that a new historical project that seeks to transcend (neoliberal) capitalism is urgently needed. a strong starting point for such a project —counter to the prevailing orthodoxy —is to expand the scope of the public sector. while the capitalist class bathed in excess in the midst of the crisis, politicians, the media and leading business pundits dogmatically asserted that workers must do more with less, that pensions, healthcare, unemployment insurance and social services were in need of modernization to better fit the new normal of declining working class incomes, increasingly ineffective collective bargaining, and global competition for investment. honest explanations as to why such social protections were no longer possible were few and far between. the fact that decades of cuts to high-income earners and corporations’ taxes had utterly failed to produce any real benefits for the majority of working people continued to elude the economic and political officialdom. quite paradoxically, decades of neoliberal reforms almost disappeared from the historical record as collective dementia (or deception) shifted the debate away from the origins and causes of the private sector-led great recession to a one-sided emphasis on the public sector. in our view, making the case for an expanded public sector necessarily entails the conversion of spaces formerly understood to be the sacrosanct domain of the private sector. nationalizing some parts of the economy, from the banking and finance sectors which sustain the institutional power of capital to the goods-producing sectors which create tangible outputs, may open up the possibility for escaping from the cycle of austerity and retrenchment which has long since characterized the body politic. democracy is never a fast-frozen state of being. rather democratic rights and freedoms are always a work in progress. expanding the terrain of the public sector via the democratization of finance and industry, carries the potential to deepen and extend such popular capacities, rights and freedoms. as marx (1875, n.p.) once put it, freedom consists in converting the state from being an organ of despotism superimposed upon society to one completely subordinate to it. thus an alternative class project from below must seek to extend the application of democratic forms out of the limited political sphere and into the organization of society as a whole. in a similar vein, marx also suggested that social reforms are never carried out by the weakness of the strong, but always by the strength of the weak (marx, 1847, n.p.). despite the setbacks to trade unionists and social editorial introduction from great recession to great deception | 11 justice activists over the period of neoliberalism, new political forms and organizational experiments are necessary in order to turn defeats into victory. all things considered, contrary to claims that the great recession is a thing of the past —as p.m. harper and finance minister flaherty are keen to remind —the articles assembled here collectively shatter the myth of canadian exceptionalism by showing that the aftershocks of the recession continue to have grave implications. starting us off, jim stanford debunks the notion that canada stands as a bastion of economic stability and superior economic management. rather, he demonstrates the shortcomings of conventional economic indicators arguing, contrary to mainstream analyses, that canada’s so-called recovery has been incomplete and relatively weak when compared with similar organization for economic cooperation and development countries. stoney and krawchencko follow with an overview of the transition from rescue strategies to exit strategies, that is, the shift from stimulus to austerity. they analyze where and how large changes in spending and restraint have taken place within the narrative of ‘crisis’ and the political opportunism that this has afforded. their analysis shows that rather than abandoning the neoliberal project, recent budgets, policies and priorities indicate a more intense and comprehensive neoliberal agenda is emerging in canada. moving forward, toby sanger argues that the acceleration of neoliberal-inspired austerity budgets will accomplish the same thing as previous recessions: lowering wage growth and shrinking the share of labour’s national income. focusing on the 2011 and 2012 federal conservative budgets, he makes the case that conventional economic approaches are incapable of adequately addressing contemporary needs, thus an alternative framework is gravely needed.the following article by heather whiteside explores the troubled track record of public-private-partnerships (p3s) in canada when delivering public infrastructure and services. her chapter investigates how recent projects in british columbia and ontario —“p3 enthusiasts” —have enabled privatization measures while disabling public oversight. the fifth article in this issue by joel harden details the canadian labour congress’ (clc) “retirement security for everyone” campaign. harden discusses how the clc grappled with the complexities of canada’s pension plan and the concrete challenges encountered along the way. despite some important shortcomings in the clc’s campaign, harden stresses the importance of expanding canada’s public pension plan in accordance with rebuilding the political capacities of organized 12 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism labour. the final article by david camfield problematizes the uncritical treatment of ‘trade union bureaucracy’ by academics and labour activists asking what do we mean when we talk about the trade union bureaucracy? in short, he argues that the sources of bureaucracy in unions lie in wage-labour contracts, the separation of conception from execution in human practical activity, the political administration of unions by state power, and the trade union officialdom. this year’s interventions section, which continues ar’s long-held emphasis on pushing the boundaries of academic orthodoxy, brings together some of the most original and innovative thinkers in a variety of sub-fields. in her wide-ranging and insightful interview, ellen meiksins wood discusses the similarities and differences of the current phase of austerity with past policy objectives; what is meant by “political marxism”; ongoing debates about the value of the term “imperialism”; the significance of the occupy movements and horizontalism; and the importance of freedom as a politically animating principle. the following interview with michael lebowitz explores the current crisis of world capitalism and its relation to canadian exceptionalism; the present state of the anti-capitalist left and its relation to party politics; the contradictions of ‘really-existing socialism’ and what socialistic responses to the recession might look like. in “neoliberalization and the matrix of action”, neil brenner, jamie peck and nick theodore take us through an examination of the different forms that neoliberalism has taken over the years; the urban dimensions of the crisis and the specific ways in which cities reproduce capital accumulation yet create openings for organized resistance to the ongoing encroachments of capital; the significance of the right to the city and occupy movements; and the importance of counter-hegemonic strategies and alternatives to capitalism. in the following commentary, shelia block considers the gender and distributional impacts of the 2012 ontario budget. she argues that reductions to services will have disproportionate impacts on low-income ontarians, and racialized and immigrant communities. furthermore, block shows how cutbacks in public sector employment will increase inequality and unemployment, in addition to expanding the share of unpaid caregiving work done primarily by women. an interview with david newhouse follows where he discusses the impacts of austerity on aboriginal communities. newhouse discusses issues related to housing and poverty reduction; health and education; mandatory minimum sentences and their impact on rehabilitative services; the relationship between first nations communities and social justice; and the continuing importance of first editorial introduction from great recession to great deception | 13 nations studies. in his valuable study of the electro-motive lockout, herman rosenfeld addresses the shortcomings and limitations of union tactics and strategy in fighting against concessionary demands from the caterpillar-owned plant. he asks why unions’ responses to concessionary demands have been so tepid and unwilling to demonstrate some of the confrontational tactics of the past? while rosenfeld is critical of the union’s non-occupation, he concludes that unions themselves are incapable of posing alternative industrial strategies that reject corporatism and dependence on progressive-sounding schemes for competitive private sector projects. instead, he argues that this requires a larger socialist and anti-capitalist movement —left of social democracy —that could research, debate and place a range of alternatives onto the larger political arena. the final article by sam gindin argues that the ‘crisis’ that desperately needs addressing is not just the economic crisis but the crisis inside the labour movement. he argues that working people have now been under concerted attack for some three decades, culminating in the austerity agenda presented as the ‘solution’ to the latest crisis. gindin reminds that the last time an economic and social crisis this deep occurred —the great depression of the 1930s —working people responded by reinventing forms of labour organization: placing industrial unionism firmly on the map and introducing dramatic new tactics like sit-downs and plant occupations. he asks: what comparable institutional and strategic changes might emerge from the present moment? rounding off ar’s thirty-sixth year of publication and twenty-fourth issue are ten book reviews which explore issues ranging from social movements and progressive activism to indigenous resistance, revolutionary health care and political theory. in including a broad survey of recently published material we hope that readers will find our reviews section useful. this issue of alternate routes would not have been possible without the tremendous support of carleton university’s departments of: sociology and anthropology; political science; law; geography and environmental studies; as well as, the institute of interdisciplinary studies; institute of political economy; and the faculty of graduate and postdoctoral affairs. we would also like to thank ryerson university’s department of politics and public administration and, in particular, the very generous support —financial, administrative and otherwise —of the centre for labour-management relations at the ted rogers school of management, and its director maurice maze14 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism rolle. thanks are also due to eric leclerc and hillary ryde collins for their valuable assistance. without the above-mentioned sources of support, this issue of ar would not have been possible. we look forward to what we hope is a long and fruitful relationship in the promotion of critical social research. last but certainly not least, a sincere thank you to all contributors and referees who took time out of their schedules to write, review, revise and re-evaluate the articles assembled here. your commitment to the most pressing issues of the day is a constant reminder of the importance of dissenting voices. for that we are grateful. in the year since the publication of ar’s 2011 issue, we are pleased to have added an online photo and video section which contains a series of presentations from past ar conferences.2 thanks are due to pance stojkovski for his tremendous assistance in editing 2012’s online conference presentations. we hope that readers and viewers will find them useful for stimulating class and other discussions. as a final note, all previously published material from 1977 to 2012 are now fully available on our website —www.alternateroutes. ca —free of charge. references cross, p. (2011). how did the 2008-10 recession and recovery compare to previous cycles. statistics canada. http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/11010-x/2011001/partpartie3-eng.htm evans, b. and g. albo. (2010). permanent austerity: the politics of the canadian exit strategy from fiscal stimulus. in fanelli, c. , c. hurl, p. lefebvre and g. ozcan (eds.), saving global capitalism: interrogating austerity and working class responses to crises (pp.7-28). ottawa: red quill books. fanelli, c. (forthcoming, 2012). fragile future. public services and collective bargaining in an era of austerity. unpublished doctoral dissertation. carleton university, ottawa, on. international monetary fund. (2011, september). world economic outlook: slowing growth, rising risks. http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/ weo/2011/02/pdf/text.pdf laxer, j. (2009). beyond the bubble: imagining a new canadian economy. toronto: between the lines. marx, k. (1847). the poverty of philosophy. http://www.marxists.org/archive/ marx/works/subject/hist-mat/pov-phil/ch02.htm 2 see http://www.alternateroutes.ca/index.php/ar/pages/view/video editorial introduction from great recession to great deception | 15 ———(1875). critique of the gotha programme. http://www.marxists.org/ archive/marx/works/1875/gotha/ mcbride, s. and j. shields. (1997). dismantling a nation: the transition to corporate rule in canada, second edition. halifax: fernwood publishing. panitch, l. & d. swartz. (2003). from consent to coercion: the assault on trade union freedoms. aurora, on: garamond press. 300 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times book review the politics of genocide by edward s. herman and david peterson. new york: monthly review press, 2010. $12.95; paper. isbn: 978-1-58367-212-9. pages: 159. reviewed by: matthew nelson1 while genocide commonly refers to the killing or attempted killing of an entire ethnic group or people, its definition is highly controversial and the subject of extensive debate. the term is often used to describe diverse forms of direct or indirect killing, which has resulted in its “frequency of use and recklessness of application” over the past several decades (103). in the politics of genocide, herman and peterson argue that while members of the western establishment and news media have rushed to denounce bloodbaths in bosnia-herzegovina, rwanda, kosovo, and darfur, they have largely remained silent over war crimes and mass atrocities committed by allied regimes in southeast asia, central america, the middle east, and sub-saharan africa. as noam chomsky suggests in the foreword to the book, since the end of the cold war, we have witnessed the emergence of an era of virtual “holocaust denial” or “genocide denial with a vengeance” (7-9). in substantiating their argument, herman and peterson draw on years of meticulous research, careful documentation and in-depth, empirical analysis of atrocities and bloodbaths around the world. the authors have done an excellent job at exposing the double standards of the us news media and its hypocritical system of propaganda. in this sense, the politics of genocide offers a needed corrective to those who manipulate and abuse the genocide label for the purposes of promoting the expansion of imperial power interests around the globe. similar to herman’s past work, however, the book offers less in the way of a theoretical addition to debates surrounding the nature of genocide and imperialism, instead providing a series of well-documented case studies. like the five ‘filters’ in herman and chomsky’s manufacturing consent, the phenomenon of genocide is simply classified through four categories—in this case, of bloodbaths. moreover, while herman and 1  matthew nelson is a ph.d. candidate at the department of political science, carleton university (ottawa, canada). book review: the politics of genocide | 301 peterson, like chomsky, do perceive imperialism fundamentally in race and class terms, their use of terms such as ‘elite’ and western ‘establishment’ rather than class or ruling class tends to obscure the real material links between genocide, capitalism and western imperialism. for herman and peterson, “a remarkable degree of continuity stretches across the many decades of bribes and threats, economic sanctions, subversion, terrorism, aggression, and occupation ordered-up by the policymaking elite of the united states” (13). after the us emerged from the second world war in a dominant economic, political and military position, it had to confront numerous nationalist upheavals in former colonial areas by peoples seeking “independence, self-determination and better lives” (14). to counter these increasingly popular demands for improvement in living standards, the us supported a series of dictatorships in countries like indonesia, south vietnam and chile. although these “national security” states were “torture-prone” and “deeply undemocratic,” they helped improve the overall climate of capitalist investment by keeping their majorities fearful and atomized (14). when local dictators failed, direct us military intervention often followed, as illustrated in the cases of vietnam, and more recently, in iraq and afghanistan. the authors draw on the framework for analyzing mass killings provided by chomsky, and herman himself in their counter-revolutionary violence: bloodbaths in fact and propaganda (crv), first published in 1973. in this work, herman and chomsky conclude that it is obvious and demonstrable that us officials, with the help of the established media, would engage in “atrocities management,” by producing incessant propaganda to deflect attention away from us-approved violence, and onto its enemies. in its framework of analysis, crv provided four categories of bloodbaths: “constructive,” “benign,” “nefarious,” and “mythical” (a sub-category under nefarious). as herman and peterson explain, “[t]hose bloodbaths carried out by the united states itself or that serve immediate and major us interests are constructive; those carried out by allies or clients are benign; and those carried out by us target states are nefarious and (sometimes) mythical” (16). in essence, instances of mass violence are evaluated differently by the us political establishment and media depending on who is responsible for carrying them out. the authors apply this analytical framework in their current work by subsuming more recent bloodbaths under the four categories, which they argue are “eerily applicable to the present”, and “apply now with the same political bias and rigor” (17-19). using empirical measures such as the coverage of key events in the media, what the authors offer the 302 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times reader is more or less a classificatory schema or conceptual model for understanding bloodbaths rather than a specific interjection into theoretical debates surrounding critical accounts of genocide, imperialism and international law. today’s leading ‘experts’ on genocide and mass atrocities, including many journalists, academics, legal scholars and policymakers, are often careful to exclude from consideration the vietnam war, the 1965-1966 indonesian massacres, and the invasion and occupation of east timor by indonesia in 1975, the latter of which resulted in the deaths of somewhere between 100,000 and 200,000 civilians (although this is a hugely debatable claim) (18). the vietnam war, and the massive “sanctions of mass destruction” directed at iraq during the 1990s, are examples of constructive atrocities, where the victims of war crimes are deemed unworthy of our attention. however, when the perpetrators of genocide are considered enemies of the west, the atrocities are nefarious and their victims are seen to be worthy of our focus and sympathy. examples of nefarious atrocities include: cambodia under the khmer rouge, iraq under saddam hussein, halabja, bosnia, rwanda, kosovo and darfur. when systematic violence is carried out by us clients—such as indonesia in east timor from 1975-1999, israel in the gaza strip and west bank from 1967 to the present, or rwanda and uganda in congo—they are viewed by the us political establishment as benign and not worthy of condemnation. the final category, mythical, results from the inflation of numbers or invention of incidents by the us government, media sources and ngos to implement pre-planned interventions such as sanctions, embargoes and the funding of various ‘color revolutions.’ the politics of genocide has done much to emphasize the biases and contradictions of us foreign policy, but it should be read in conjunction with other theoretical contributions to themes related to genocide, imperialism and international law. first, while herman and peterson recognize that the history of ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity demonstrates “the centrality of racism to the imperial project” (22), there is little discussion of why advanced capitalist powers and oppressed nations are, in the first place, not equal partners in shaping the world. due in part to their use of terms such as ‘elite’ and western ‘establishment’ rather than class, their analysis should be complimented by recent work that is more explicit in highlighting the centrality of racism to issues of class, capitalism and imperialism in the international system. while not directly touching on the topic of genocide, marxist theorists writing on current modes of imperialism such as leo panitch and book review: the politics of genocide | 303 sam gindin (global capitalism and american empire, 2004) and david harvey (the new imperialism, 2003) emphasize the extent to which current modes of imperialism continue to exacerbate racial as well as global class inequalities. identifying the class basis of the new imperialism would help identify some of the underlying reasons for why media coverage of genocides in the west is often silent with respect to crimes committed by the various client regimes of advanced capitalist states. second, herman and peterson are highly critical of the “selective investigation” and “selective impunity” of the international criminal court (icc) in prosecuting alleged perpetrators of genocide, especially, in the contemporary age of ‘responsibility to protect,’ the exclusion from its jurisdiction of the international crime of aggression, judged at nuremburg to be the “supreme international crime” (21). however, on this theme, the authors seem to imply that the responsibility to protect doctrine and the very notion of human rights are to be located outside of contemporary imperialism. in this sense, they are often ambiguous on whether they seek to defend a position of legal neutrality, holding out hope for the reformed international law and institutions, which marxist theorist of international law china miéville has recently argued in between equal rights (2006), are completely incapable of adequately resisting imperialism. not only does legal equality, in this sense, mask actually existing inequality, the appeal to international law tends to undermine the most effective avenue for advancing necessary political resistance against the new imperialism—building solidarity as widely as possible through social movements centered not only on antiracism, but also on class struggle. 304 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times 978-1-926958-01-9 163 book review cops, crime and capitalism: the law and order agenda in canada by todd gordon. halifax: fernwood publishing, 2006. $21.95 can, paper. isbn 1-55266-185-7. pages 1-171. reviewer: gulden ozcan1 debates around the notions of security, police, the state and the dissent have accelerated in the aftermath of the g8/20 summit in toronto. on the face of these debates, revisiting one of the ambitious contributions to the critical literature on police in canada is important. todd gordon’s cops, crime and capitalism: the law and order agenda in canada provides two primary insights that can be utilized in current discussions. first, gordon situates his analysis of the broader police project in the context of massive restructuring of social relations after each crisis of capitalism. thus, the increasing adoption of the ‘law-and-order policies’ by the canadian state since the 1990s is depicted in relation to the neoliberal restructuring of social relations after the downfall of keynesian policies. second, gordon’s focus on racialised and gendered aspects of policing in canada opens up the possibility for new approaches to locate this long-delayed discussion at the very centre of the materialist analysis of state power, capital and labour relations. gordon, by conducting a careful empirical study of legal regulations, demonstrates how police practices have served the systematic subordination of racialised and gendered populations in canada. the theoretical stance gordon employs in the book is informed by open marxism and the concepts developed by mark neocleous, one of the leading figures in critical police/security studies. the open marxism approach provides him with theoretical tools in defining the state as the political form of the class antagonism between labour and capital. even though the organization of social relations are 1 gulden ozcan is a phd student in the department of sociology & anthropology at carleton university. she can be reached at gozcan@connect.carleton.ca cops, crime and capitalism: the law and order agenda in canada 164 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research operated by the state and its apparatuses, gordon argues these operations originate from the struggles between labour and capital. gordon draws on neocleous’s historical analysis of the broader police project in relation to the rise of capitalism as well as his conceptualizations of the “political administration” and the “fabrication of social order”. paralleling neocleous, gordon defines policing as a form of “political administration” that has historically played an important role in the “fabrication of social order” (pp. 38-50). i shall also acknowledge a third theoretical stance gordon uses, that is, his critical attitude towards “marxist-oriented functionalism” and foucauldian “panoptical theories”. although he mentions the former very briefly only in the introduction, he spends a great deal of the first chapter on the latter. it is, therefore, important to mention gordon’s critique of what he calls “panoptical theories”, i.e., theories that take “governing at a distance” approach as their starting point. gordon pinpoints a “gap between the reality of contemporary policing and its portrayal” in this literature (p. 7). he identifies three main assumptions of panoptic theories: (1) policing is done electronically at-a-distance; (2) electronic policing is exercised equally on everybody regardless of class, race and gender differences; (3) electronic policing reinforces the emergence of more local and autonomous forms of policing (pp. 7-8). gordon’s position toward these assumptions unfolds in the question of “at a distance or in your face?” (p. 13). he basically argues that the new tactics of policing does not change the historical objective of police forces, i.e., targeting working-class, racialised and gendered populations through ever-ascending centralized and intense state power (pp. 8-27). drawing attention to the problematic aspects of panoptic theories strengthens gordon’s approach to police as a state-centred strategy. although his criticisms of the panoptical and at-a-distance approaches are persuasive, his equation of foucault with foucauldians is not. it is obvious that foucault’s work has generated a basis for both panoptical theories and governing at a distance approach. however, some aspects of these approaches contradict foucault’s own writings. gordon does not distinguish foucault from the foucauldians and thus presents a reductionist attitude towards foucault’s contribution to the literature on police. his miscomprehension of foucault’s oeuvre results in a few literally wrong assumptions such as the naming of ‘at a distance approach’ after foucault—which was originally suggested by p. miller and n. rose in 19922—, the rejection of foucault’s meticulous attention to material social relations, the denial of foucault’s understanding of police as a state-centric initiative at its birth, and his attack of foucault’s notion of “docile bodies” on the basis of the absence of agency. nevertheless, this confusion neither 2 rose, n. and miller, p. 1992 “political power beyond the state: problematics of government”, british journal of sociology 43(2): 173-205. 165cops, crime and capitalism: the law and order agenda in canada diminishes the strong basis of the arguments in the book, nor contributes anything to it. following the theoretical debate in the second chapter, gordon draws on the history of police in the making of the capitalist social order from the nineteenth century onwards. gordon defines this historical role of police as such: police power has been mobilized [by the ruling classes] to criminalize a series of street-based activities that either provide people with an opportunity to survive outside market relations or serve as distractions from waged work. in the process, policing has worked to constitute a class of labourers dependent on the wage for subsistence and thereby a bourgeois order rooted in the authority of private property and the subordination of working people to the imperatives of capital accumulation (p. 50). in what follows, he compares and contrasts nineteenth-century police practices with more current police practices and thus illustrates the continuous dynamic that lies at the very raison d’etre of the police project, i.e., targeting labour power to build a more orderly, disciplined, regulated and supervised society in accord with the changing needs of capitalism. the third chapter provides a brief history of the neoliberal transition from keynesianism in advanced capitalist countries, with specific attention to canada. in order to respond to the growing structural imbalances in the economy, gordon explains that labour costs have been reduced significantly since the 1960s through increasing the number of non-standard, non-unionized, and unqualified types of labour as a state policy. this of course was not a pain-free process. although the initial attempt of consecutive governments was to have policies of “austerity by consent”, gordon argues this did not work due to the disruptive power of labour at the time. as a result, the coercive power of the state has been increased and lawand-order policies increasingly adopted (pp. 54-57). the fourth chapter portrays that new regulations introduced with the lawand-order policies that target not so much the poor, but the contemporary indigent that seek to live outside the labour market. in this sense, gordon examines the vagrancy act of 1869 and shows that following the economic crisis of the 1970s, vagrancy status did not come back to the criminal code; however, substitutes have taken their place in an attempt to serve the same objective. this is evidenced, for example, in provincial legislation and municipal by-laws such as the safe streets acts, panhandling by-laws, and the adoption of targeting and intelligence policing strategies (pp. 82-85). accompanying this new work ethic has been a re-regulation of social assistance programs. gordon reveals that people in need of social assistance 166 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research due to unemployment are encouraged to gain and/or improve their “transferable skills” (p. 105). these skills are defined as self-discipline, getting to work on time, meeting the expectations of the employer and being motivated to work. in the last chapter of the book gordon problematizes how policing as “an administrative feature of state power” takes on a certain position when it comes to immigrant communities (p. 128). unlike some marxist approaches to immigration, gordon does not limit his account to portraying immigrants only as a source of cheap foreign labour. although the initial emphasis is put on the role of immigrant labour in filling the worst jobs canada has to offer, gordon does not ignore other circumstances surrounding immigrants. he especially takes issue with the conditions of women and non-white immigrants. for instance, he demonstrates how the points system used in immigration applications neglects the unpaid domestic labour of women and makes them rely on their husband in the application process (p. 115). moreover, he establishes the link between the exploitative immigration policies of the federal government and the cheap labour requirements of capital by drawing attention to the non-immigrant employment authorization program (nieap), live-in caregiver program, as well as the government’s blindness to nonstatus immigrants’ participation in the labour process. gordon also speaks to the fact that the criminalization of certain drugs are strongly related to canada’s immigration policies. he claims, for example, that the prohibition of opium in 1908 was a direct response to chinese immigration. the ruling class was concerned that opium shows “signs of non-conformity with “canadian” order, and that this vice of bodily pleasure might infiltrate the ranks of the white working class” (p. 130). the same applies to the prohibition of cocaine in 1911, cannabis in 1923 and khat in 1997, however this time as a response to black, mexican and somalian immigrants, with the explicit aim being to produce public order on the streets (p. 135). all in all, gordon’s book provides a significant overview of policing in canada. it has much to contribute to the current debates on the role of police in the current reformation of the neoliberal order. although gordon’s approach to police as a state-centred strategy leaves some questions unanswered such as the ever-increasing numbers of private police, he provides an accessible account to remind us that policing is a strategy driven by a moral discourse on the importance of employment and self-discipline, rather than a strategy to fight crime. whole book pdf what is trade union bureaucracy? | 133 what is trade union bureaucracy? a theoretical account — david camfield1 ‘union bureaucracy’ is an important yet vexed term in the study of trade unions and in radical politics. at worst, it can be a label pinned by left-wing activists on those union officers whose actions or beliefs are seen as repugnant. this usage confers the label of ‘bureaucrat’ on some union officials but not on those whose behaviour is seen as praiseworthy. the term is also used in a more serious way. many critical analysts (and others) have drawn attention to the existence of a layer of full-time union officers and staff and argued that this group of people – ‘the trade union bureaucracy’ – plays a conservative role in unions. there are many versions of this kind of analysis of ‘the bureaucracy,’ some much more insightful than others. yet there have been scarcely any recent attempts to refine and present a coherent theory of union bureaucracy.2 unfortunately, it remains the case that in the study of unions, as john kelly (1988) argued over two decades ago, ‘rarely is the term “bureaucracy” defined or its use justified on any theoretical grounds, and it is normally unclear which of several different definitions is actually being employed’ (p.155). moreover, theories of ‘the trade union bureaucracy’ understood as a group of people can function as blinkers to a critical understanding of the character of union activity itself. a focus on official leaderships can lead us to ignore or neglect how union activity happens, how the relations among members and between officials and members are organized. to put the same point 1 david camfield teaches labour studies at the university of manitoba and is the author of canadian labour in crisis: reinventing the workers’ movement (2011). thanks to david mcnally, charlie post, alan sears and sheila wilmot for discussions about some of the ideas in this article, earlier versions of which were presented at the annual meetings of the society for socialist studies in 2009 and at the 2010 toronto historical materialism conference. 2 brenner (1986), leier (1991) and some of the essays collected in hyman (1989) represent original contributions that attempt to clarify the character of union bureaucracy. the past two decades have seen very few theoretical contributions on this question. darlington and upchurch (2012) is a notable exception. 134 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism differently, bureaucratic forms of social practice in union organizations risk escaping examination when ‘the bureaucracy’ is the centre of our field of vision. when this happens, the result is a very partial understanding of unions as working-class movement organisations. consequently, this article proposes an alternative theoretical account of union bureaucracy and union officialdom (members who hold elected or appointed union office, and union staff). this account seeks to incorporate the best insights of the tradition of critical analysis of ‘the trade union bureaucracy’ (full-time union officials) into a theoretical framework founded on an original conceptualization of bureaucracy as a particular mode of existence of social relations, whose relevance is not limited to the study of unions.3 the development of an explicit conceptualization of bureaucracy as a social phenomenon and, on that foundation, an account of union bureaucracy is intended to address the problem of theoretical unclarity identified by kelly. another reason for addressing the nature of bureaucracy itself is that marxist writers on bureaucracy (e.g. mandel, 1992) have tended to pay relatively little attention to theorizing the phenomenon at the most basic level, in contrast to the care paid to concepts such as class. the account proposed here attempts to grasp core processes of bureaucratization within unions in capitalist societies. it identifies the sources of bureaucracy in unions as wage-labour contracts, the separation of conception from execution in human practical activity, the political administration of unions by state power and union officialdom. the perspective advanced encourages analysis that combines attention to different manifestations of bureaucracy throughout union organizations with examination of the specific role of full-time officers and staff (rather than one or the other). the article concludes with a brief discussion of how this theory directs our attention in the analysis of contemporary unions, with specific reference to the us and canada. trade union bureaucracy as the officialdom when the concept of union bureaucracy is used in a serious fashion (rather than as a superficial political criticism), it usually refers to a group of people. this is how the concept figures in classic sociological studies such as robert michels’s oft-cited book of a century ago on 3 an anonymous reviewer pointed out that this theory could be used to scrutinize the “’ngoization’ of social movements” and “the relationship between ngos and social movements,” but i am unable to address those issues here. what is trade union bureaucracy? | 135 working-class movement organizations (1966)4 and c wright mills’s 1948 book on us union officials, the new men of power (2001, p.224). union bureaucracy is equated with a group of people by most marxist writers. for ernest mandel (1992), it is a layer of full-time officials that has carried out ‘the usurpation of decision-making power’ within the union organisation; a stratum of full-timers who have not accomplished this are ‘an incipient bureaucracy’ (p.68). for alex callinicos (1995), the union bureaucracy is ‘a social layer made up of full time officials with a material interest in confining the class struggle to the search for reforms within a capitalist framework’ (p.16). robert brenner (1985) uses the term in a similar manner, and many more examples of this kind could be cited. this usage is also common among non-marxist radicals. for example, historian mark leier (1991) advances a perspective on union bureaucracy influenced by the anarchist mikhail bakunin. leier argues that the bureaucracy is made up of leaders whose ‘offices are protected from immediate and effective control by the membership’ (p.420). by including shop stewards as part of the bureaucracy (p.424), leier differs with the previously-mentioned writers, but he shares with them the idea that the term ‘union bureaucracy’ refers to a group of people. in identifying the widespread use of the term trade union bureaucracy in this sense, i do not want to imply that all those who use it in this manner theorize union bureaucracy in the same way or equally well. for example, callinicos (1995) argues that union struggle within capitalist society inevitably requires compromises with capital, which must be negotiated by workers’ representatives. some of these representatives become full-time officials and ‘the effect, whatever the beliefs of the officials, is to isolate them from those they represent.’ removed from the paid workplace and no longer employed by capital, they ‘come to see negotiation, compromise, the reconciliation of capital and labour as the very stuff of trade unionism’ (p.17) and oppose struggle because it threatens negotiations and union funds. mandel (1992)’s theory is different in important respects. in power and money, he sees the ‘cultural underdevelopment’ of the working class (the normal ‘status of the proletariat under the rule of capital’) as the basis of union bureaucracy (p.60). at the same time, he identifies an inexorable organizational logic that creates a bureaucracy: ‘the development of mass political or trade-union organisations is incon4 while michels’s focus is on political parties and he does not use the exact term ‘union bureaucracy,’ his work considers unions as well as parties and his discussion of party bureaucracy equates it with a group of people. see the comments on michels by perusek (1995). 136 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism ceivable without an apparatus of full-timers and functionaries. at the most basic level, it is impossible to collect, centralise and administer the dues of a million members through purely voluntary labour’ (p.59). leier (1991)’s notion of bureaucracy is different again, as he argues that the bureaucracy’s ‘distinguishing characteristic...is their power over the membership’ (p.420). my point is simply that these writers share a certain understanding: union bureaucracy means the labour officialdom. the strengths and weaknesses of these specific accounts is not my concern here, though it is worth pointing out that they are all more sound theoretical efforts than michels’s belief in an iron law of oligarchy rooted in the allegedly universal incompetence of ‘the masses’ and the inherent nature of organization itself (michels, 1966; barker, 2001; perusek, 1995) or lenin’s influential but deeply flawed idea that union officials are conservative because they are part of a ‘labour aristocracy’ bribed with imperialist super-profits (lenin, 1920; post, 2011). these theories highlight the significance of the existence of layers of union officials, particularly full-time officers and staff, and nothing that follows should be interpreted as dismissing the importance of this social phenomenon, to which i will return. the most important problem common to such accounts is that their focus on full-time union officials is conducive to neglecting how union activity is socially organized more broadly. at worst, it can lead to a depiction of union officialdom as a rotten crust beneath which lies a pure, untainted organization and membership. another pitfall is that in situations where there are few or no full-time officials – as is the case in many smaller union locals in the us and canada – the theory implies by definition that bureaucracy is not a significant issue, since there are few or no bureaucrats present. above all, focusing on the head can, so to speak, lead to neglect of the body. for example, callinicos (1995) devotes most of a chapter on ‘capitalism, the unions and union leaders’ to ‘the union bureaucracy.’ it says very little about how relations between officers (whether lay, to use the british term for workers holding union office who remain on the job, or full-time) and other members are organized in the country whose unions are at the centre of the book, the uk. it also pays scant attention to the nature of collective bargaining relations or how the regulation of unions by state power (the political administration [neocleous, 1996] of unions) influences uk unions, including the officialdom. questions about the condition of union organization in paid workplaces what is trade union bureaucracy? | 137 and in branches (union locals), levels of member participation and control, the relationship between unionized workers and the nonunionized majority of the working class and the gender and racial order within british unions are raised barely or not at all. this kind of critical analysis leaves many important dimensions of a union movement unexamined or treats them as of little importance. the elaboration and defence by ralph darlington and martin upchurch (2012) of the same theoretical perspective on full-time union officials for which callinicos argues is less narrow in scope. however, it has little to say about unions as bureaucratic organizations, rather than the character of the stratum of officials at their head. this suggests that to identify bureaucracy with ‘the bureaucracy’ is too limited a notion. we need a theoretical approach that embraces other phenomena too, not just full-time officials. if union bureaucracy is not to be equated with the officialdom, what is it? richard hyman (1989) has proposed that bureaucracy in unions is ‘a corrosive pattern of internal social relations manifest in a differential distribution of expertise and activism; in a dependence of the mass of union members on the initiative and experience of a relatively small group of leaders – both official and ‘unofficial’’ (p.246). to distinguish bureaucracy as a social relation from union officers and staff as a group, one can use the term ‘labour officialdom’ to refer to the latter. from this perspective, to the degree that the relationship between members and the officers and staff is one of dependence, then what we have is a bureaucratic officialdom. this approach has the advantage of conceptually distinguishing the phenomenon of bureaucracy from that of the officialdom as a social layer. it allows us to understand many contemporary unions as bureaucratic mass organizations headed by particular bureaucratic officialdoms. unfortunately, it also creates new problems: it severs bureaucracy from any notion of regulations that constrain agents, and its emphasis on dependence on leaders blurs the line between the problematic of bureaucracy and the broader problematic of subaltern agency, self-activity and leadership. the latter is relevant in situations where bureaucracy is absent or insignificant. for these and perhaps other reasons,5 hyman’s approach, while a thoughtful attempt to move beyond the limitations of a conventional marxist theory of union bureaucracy, is flawed and unsatisfactory. 5 see darlington and upchurch (2012) and the rejoinder by hyman (2012). 138 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism what is bureaucracy? to raise the level of theoretical reflection on union bureaucracy to a higher level in a way that allows us to understand many unions as bureaucratic mass organizations, it is helpful to pose the question directly: what is bureaucracy? i suggest that bureaucracy is best understood as a mode of existence of social relations in which people’s activity (labour) is organized through formal rules that limit their ability to determine its character and goals, and which they themselves are not able to alter with ease. although informal rules may also affect people’s activity in similar ways, one of the distinguishing features of bureaucracy as a social phenomenon is the formal character of rules, as recognized by max weber (1952).6 it should also be noted that the understanding of bureaucracy suggested here does not claim that all social organization involving formal rules is bureaucratic (as might be argued by supporters of an extremely individualistic version of anarchism); rules are bureaucratic only when they limit people’s ability to determine the character and goals of their own activity and cannot be easily changed by those affected. this form of organizing social relations, while commonplace in contemporary capitalist societies, does not originate with capitalism. bureaucracy can be found in societies that long pre-date capitalism. anthropologist david graeber (2006) argues that bureaucracy occurs where ‘social situations...founded on structural violence’ (by which he means ‘forms of pervasive social inequality that are ultimately backed up by the threat of physical harm’) are being managed (pp. 4-5). the development and geographical expansion of capitalism is associated with the spread of bureaucracy; as georg lukács (1971) noted, the concern for prediction and calculability in the capitalist enterprise observed by weber is part of a broader drive to subject different aspects of social life to ‘an increasingly formal and standardised treatment...in which there is an ever-increasing remoteness from the qualitative and material essence of the “things” to which bureaucratic activity pertains’ (p.99). one of the ‘forms of pervasive social inequality’ most relevant to bureaucracy is the separation of intellectual from manual labour and the monopolization of the former by a small number of people. alfred sohn-rethel (1978) argues that intellectual labour, as distinct from manual labour, is defined by ‘the use of non-empirical form-abstractions which may be represented by nothing other than non-empirical, “pure” 6 the conceptualization of bureaucracy being proposed here is obviously not weber’s. my point is simply that weber was right to recognize the significance of formal rules to the phenomenon of bureaucracy. what is trade union bureaucracy? | 139 concepts’ (p.66). intellectual labour in this sense, he contends, first arose with the emergence of philosophy in greece, a development made possible by the ‘non-empirical real abstraction’ (p.66) involved in a ‘social synthesis’ – sohn-rethel’s term for ‘the network of relations by which society forms a coherent whole’ (p.4) – that is ‘in strict spatio-temporal separation from all acts of man’s [sic] material interchange with nature’ (p.67). thus intellectual labour was made possible by ‘the generalisation intrinsic in the monetary commensuration of commodity values promoted by coinage’ (p.102). the first occurrence of coinage he dates to ‘about 680 bc on the ionian side of the aegean, in lydia or phrygia’ (p.59).7 a number of questions can be raised about sohn-rethel’s account.8 however, for present purposes, what matters is that intellectual labour has been a source of bureaucracy to the extent that it has been monopolized by privileged social groups with the power to impose restrictive formal rules that organize the life activity of other people. examples of such groups include priests and other office-holders in religious institutions and scientists in the service of state power. a related but distinct form of domination giving rise to bureaucracy is the separation of the activity of conceptualizing the goals and methods of human activity from its execution.9 we can see rudimentary examples of this before the development of capitalism, for instance in rule-books of military organisation and state administration and in patriarchal laws that authorize men’s control over women’s labour. but it is under capitalism that the separation of conception (thinking) from execution (doing) becomes pervasive. as cornelius castoriadis (1988a) observed 7 according to seaford (2012, p. 82), “opinion has now shifted to a date towards the end of the seventh century.” 8 to contemporary readers sohn-rethel (1978)’s historical argument as presented in compressed summary here may appear as simply an example of the kind of hellenocentrism that was so marked in eurocentric german culture in the 1800s. for discussion of egypt (where he locates the earliest initial manifestation of the separation of intellectual labour), asia and greece, see pp. 86-103. an assessment of his theoretical account would require an interrogation of both his general claim about the social conditions required for the emergence of intellectual labour and the specific geographical and historical coordinates he posits for its emergence, bearing in mind the critique of western european hellenocentrism raised by authors such as goody (2006). kapferer (1980) raises a number of questions about sohnrethel’s argument, including about his claim that social synthesis in ancient greek societies was based on commodity exchange. seaford (2012) defends sohn-rethel’s analysis. 9 i distinguish the separation of conception from execution from the split between intellectual and manual labour in order to help us recognize examples of the former that do not involve the use of what sohn-rethel calls ‘non-empirical form-abstractions which may be represented by nothing other than non-empirical, ‘pure’ concepts’ and to grasp that in contemporary capitalist societies intellectual labour itself is subjected to the separation of conception from execution. for a brief discussion of this in the case of physics see schmidt (2000, p. 140). schmidt (2000) deserves to be read by anyone concerned with bureaucracy in contemporary society. 140 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism in 1960, the ‘arbitrary end’ of ‘maximum production’ ‘is accomplished through the ever-heightened separation of direction and execution, by reducing workers to the status of mere executants, and by transferring the functions of management outside the labor process’ of producing goods and services (p. 273). as harry braverman (1998)’s better-known and slightly later version of such an analysis argues, capitalist development fuels an ‘incessant breakdown of labor processes into simplified operations taught to workers as tasks,’ creating more ‘labor from which all conceptual elements have been removed and along with them most of the skill, knowledge and understanding’ (p.319). even paul thompson (1989), who does not argue that the separation of conception from execution is a necessary feature of capitalism’s organization of labour processes, recognises that competitive accumulation drives capital to reorganize production in order to reduce costs, and that this ‘sets limits to the use of workers’ creative capacities and constrains attempts to dispense with hierarchical relations’ (p.243). whether one accepts the stronger or the weaker claim (or an intermediate position), it is evident that the separation of conception from execution takes place on a large scale in the sphere of paid work in capitalist societies. this is a feature of labour processes in capitalist societies in all but their earliest phases, and is often enforced through formal rules. although capitalist development creates new productive forces and patterns of workplace organisation that generate novel kinds of conceptual work, employers have historically proceeded to attempt to separate conception from execution within such new types of labour. the example of computer programming work illustrates this trend (p. 111-112). importantly, the process of separating conception from execution is not limited to the sphere of paid work.10 this separation is also basic to public political life in capitalist societies. in capitalist states with liberal democratic systems of government the contours of the political administration of society are decided by small numbers of elected officials and unelected high-ranking civil servants; other citizens are left to execute what is decided for them. whether in the relations between employers 10 a merit of castoriadis’s work is his sensitivity to this, but he errs in going so far as to claim that ‘the fundamental social relationship of modern capitalism’ is that ‘between directors and executants’ (1988b, p. 201). writing in 1963, castoriadis displaced the relationship between capital and labour from the core of capitalist society: for classical marxism, ‘society was seen as dominated by the abstract power of impersonal capital. today, we see it as dominated by a hierarchical bureaucratic structure’ (1993, p. 31). he contrasts ‘the market’ to ‘bureaucratichierarchical organisation’ as ‘the central structuring moment of contemporary society’ (p. 31). in so doing he wrongly conflates market with capital (value). such a perspective is extremely ill-equipped to understand the rise of neoliberal capitalism and its current crisis. what is trade union bureaucracy? | 141 and wage-workers or between state power and the governed, this separation is frequently accomplished by organizing people’s life activity through the restrictive regulations of bureaucracy. in the understanding proposed here, then, bureaucracy refers to a form of social relations, a way of organising social activity, rather than a group of people. this conceptualization is quite open, but also delimits the concept clearly. bureaucracy does not encompass all situations in which people’s ability to determine their own objectives and how to act are constrained. it is present when such constraint is associated with formal rules that people cannot easily change themselves. for example, a small business run in an utterly arbitrary and despotic fashion by an owner who ‘micro-manages’ a workforce of people carrying out extremely deskilled work and who goes to great lengths to prevent workers from having access to information about the enterprise’s affairs is not a case of bureaucracy. instead, it is a classic case of the employer control strategy that richard edwards (1979) dubs simple control. this conceptualization also recognises that bureaucracy is not the only phenomenon that can impede subaltern self-activity. the phenomenon of substitutionism needs to be distinguished from bureaucracy. substitutionism involves one or more persons substituting their own actions for those of a larger number of people. to put it differently, substitutionist actions are those which do not raise the level of self-activity among members of a given group. bureaucratic methods are often substitutionist – as in the case of union rules which allow rank-and-file members little or no way to be involved in union affairs and which assign all important tasks to officers and staff, thereby substituting executive members and staff for an active membership – but not all substitutionism is bureaucratic. for example, a militant local union president who preaches ‘leave it to me’ to members and attempts to squelch or take control of any initiative that does not emanate from himself is undoubtedly a barrier to workers’ self-activity. however, his behaviour should only be considered bureaucratic if (or to the extent that) it involves the use of formal rules that limit workers’ ability to determine their own goals and actions.11 the conceptualization developed here can help us to understand how bureaucracy can pervade the practice of unionism. it is broad enough to cover a range of practices found in contemporary labour movements, including some phenomena excluded by the ‘bureaucracy 11 my use of substitutionism is influenced by but not identical to that in cliff (1960), which discusses it as a problem in the relationship between workers and a political party ‘act[ing] as proxy in their name and on their behalf, regardless of what the workers thought or wanted.’ 142 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism as officialdom’ approach. for example, it alerts us to the fact that basic distinguishing features of how unions are politically administered by state power in canada and the us – the legal and contractual prohibition of mid-contract strikes and sympathy strikes, and the requirement to resolve mid-contract disputes through grievance and arbitration procedures – are sources of union bureaucracy. these legal impositions take complaints about the employer out of the hands of unionized workers and channel them into a formal process. once a grievance enters the process, it is ‘owned’ by union officials, not the workers affected. another example of bureaucracy in the labour movement is when union rules sanction the monopolization of access to important information by a union executive or negotiating team. members deprived of such information are less able to act independently. a union organizational structure that allows few or no opportunities for democratic decisionmaking by members during a strike is also an example of bureaucracy; even if the members have democratically set the goals of the strike, their inability to direct its course means that only a few people can determine how it is conducted. a union whose constitution gives members who hold no union office few or even no ways to participate in its affairs on an ongoing basis – for example, because general membership meetings are rare – is also bureaucratic. in such unions a few people conceive and execute union work, leaving most members with literally no way to get involved. when rules of order for the running of union meetings impede members’ influence, this too is a case of bureaucracy. these examples, which are simply meant to give a sense of some of the ways that bureaucracy can be manifested within union organizations, suggest just how much is missed when a theory of union bureaucracy focuses solely or mainly on union full-time officers and staff. the social roots of union bureaucracy what gives rise to union bureaucracy? it is arguably still true, as alvin gouldner (1955) claimed, that the root causes of bureaucracy are most often seen as human nature and the complexity and size of organizations such as unions (p.498-500). even darlington (2010), a marxist, has written that ‘a hierarchical and bureaucratic structure... is inherent in the requirement that unions are administratively efficient’ (p.9). as gouldner (1955) argues, such explanations, found in the work of theorists including weber, michels and talcott parsons, are shot through with ‘pessimism and fatalism’ (p. 498). a few years after gouldner published his challenge to the dominant sociological theories of bureaucracy what is trade union bureaucracy? | 143 of the day, castoriadis responded to the claim that large organizations must inevitably be bureaucratic by arguing that the need to organize centralization in organizations is indeed an inevitable and objective problem. however, it is a problem that can be resolved either through bureaucracy or direct democracy. ‘a general meeting of strikers, an elected strike committee, the commune, the soviet, the factory council – that’s centralisation’ (castoriadis, 1988b, p.207) or, more precisely, these are anti-bureaucratic responses created by self-organized workers in struggle to the problem of centralization. castoriadis’s demonstration that there are alternatives to bureaucratic organization suggests that theories which deduce union bureaucracy as simply the inevitable outcome of organizational scale are flawed. instead of adopting an empty fatalism, we need to explore the determinate social conditions out of which union bureaucracy arises. arguably the most important cause of union bureaucracy is the practice at the centre of unionism itself: negotiating the price of labour power. the subordination of wageearners to capital in the paid workplace sphere leads organized workers to seek to regulate aspects of their working lives through collective agreements with their employers. the unequal balance of power between capital and labour is the reason why workers tend to try to codify wage levels and conditions of work in contracts. only when workers’ collective power and willingness to confront employers is so strong that they find it unnecessary or even undesirable to fix wages or conditions will wage-earners not try to lock in such matters in contracts. the ‘episodic and discontinuous character of working-class struggle under capitalism’ (post, 1999, p.122) means that circumstances in which wage-earners enjoy such a highly favourable relationship of forces are both uncommon and generally short-lived. these rare situations have given rise to unions that refuse to sign contracts, such as the industrial workers of the world in the early 20th century and some early locals of the committee for industrial organisation/ congress of industrial organisations (cio).12 once contracts are in place, employers, who are concerned with the uninterrupted production of goods and services, have strong incentives to insist that there be no strikes for the duration of the agreement. similarly, they have an incentive to assert their control over how their employees work. since it is rare for the balance of class power in the paid workplace sphere in capitalist societies to be decisively in workers’ favour – after all, this is the fundamental reason why workers fight for collective agreements in the first place – unions face pressures to accept 12 see brissenden (1957), p.115, 324, 330, 371; lynd (1996), p.5. 144 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism limits on strikes and to recognize managerial authority. such concessions arise directly out of the relations between capital and labour in the labour market and the labour process. when formalized, they are bureaucratic: they limit workers’ ability to determine the character and goals of their activity. this, then, is the source of union bureaucracy at the very core of unionism, probably its most important source. although the rule-governed separation of intellectual from manual labour is an important source of bureaucracy in contemporary capitalist societies, above all in matters related to the natural sciences and society, it is not especially important in the case of union bureaucracy. if we follow sohn-rethel (1978) and understand intellectual labour as involving ‘the use of non-empirical form-abstractions which may be represented by nothing other than non-empirical, ‘pure’ concepts’ (p.66) – for example, abstract time, space and motion – then it is difficult to see them as important to unionism. a far more important source of union bureaucracy is the separation of conception from execution. this is a key element of the alienation of labour – the structural lack of control by workers over the labour process, workplace organization and production in general – that is a hallmark of capitalist societies after their earliest phases (rinehart, 2006). in societies in which the separation of conception from execution has become normalized, or even just common, it is little surprise that workers tend to organize unions in ways that bureaucratically reflect and reproduce this separation. organizing in this way is consistent with how many aspects of their social lives are structured, including schooling, paid work, state-citizen relations and, often, voluntary associations. the separation between conception and execution can be seen in, for example, union rules that give enormous decision-making power to staff and elected officers, treating the membership as passive executants. this corresponds to how many employers treat employees, state officials treat citizens and religious authorities treat members of their congregations. nevertheless, it is also noteworthy that the tendency for workers to organize unions in ways that embody this dominant feature of capitalist society coexists with a countertendency: workers can and do organize in directly democratic ways. this democratic impulse arises out of experiences of workers’ self-activity and self-organization, and disrupts the separation between conception and execution. it can be observed most clearly in the most democratic contemporary unions, such as the fledgling national union of healthcare workers in the us (early, 2011); the unions affiliated with france’s union syndicale solidaires federation what is trade union bureaucracy? | 145 (coupé, 2007); and in forms of collective action such as strikes in which workers make important decisions in mass meetings and elect recallable strike committees.13 many unions bear, to some extent, the imprint of both this democratic countertendency and the tendency to reproduce the separation of conception from execution. the relative strength of the two in a particular case is the product of a concrete history. capitalist state power is also a significant root of union bureaucracy. states often impose formal rules that influence the social organization of unions. such rules are examples of what mark neocleous (1996) dubs political administration, his term for the legal and administrative activity of capitalist state power in civil society. political administration constitutes legal persons as both subjects of rights and objects of administration and regulates the working class through mechanisms that respond to workers’ struggles but in ways that aim to extinguish their subversive potential (p. 88-92, 110-116). it is very common for capitalist states, once they legally recognize unions, to use their legal and regulatory powers to compel unions to structure themselves in ways that limit members’ ability to determine the goals and methods of action. bans on strikes or restrictions on the timing and nature of strikes are perhaps the most frequently imposed restrictions. in the us, the ‘gradual metamorphosis of grievance arbitration from a voluntary and private mode of dispute resolution into a semicompulsory, institutional system for the management of complex enterprises’ (klare, 1978, p.377) was driven in large part by a series of judicial decisions, and the taft-hartley act of 1947 imposed important restrictions on strike action (green, 1980, p.198). in canada, legislation passed in the 1940s prohibited all strikes during the term of a contract and made grievance arbitration compulsory (fudge and tucker, 2001). however, we should not forget that bureaucratic rules concerning such matters need not be imposed by state power, since they also arise from within capital-labour relations in the labour process and the labour market, as argued above. for example, in the us the initial 1937 contract between general motors and the united auto workers ‘established a grievance procedure designed to circumvent the shop steward systems and prevent wildcat strikes’ and the 1940 contract stipulated that the grievance procedure would be the only way that the union would challenge management actions (edsforth, 1987, p.177, 193). the new bureaucratic state mechanisms for the political administration of labour that were instituted in canada in the 1940s amplified and generalized developments such as management rights clauses and grievance procedures 13 for example, the wildcat construction strikes in britain in february 2009 (gall, 2010). 146 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism that had already begun to emerge in collective bargaining (while also drawing on the us wagner act model of industrial legality and elements of pre-war canadian legislation) (camfield, 2002, p. 318). having argued that fatalist theories which simply deduce union bureaucracy from the existence of large-scale organisation are unconvincing, this article has discussed three social roots of union bureaucracy: contracts arising out of the wage relation, the separation of conception from execution and the political administration of unions by capitalist state power. it is now time to return to our starting point, the union officialdom. in addition to being a fourth source of union bureaucracy, it deserves some examination as a specific phenomenon. what about the officialdom? so far this alternative account of union bureaucracy has said almost nothing about union officials. some readers may be inclined to think that this is a theory of bureaucracy that gives bureaucrats an alibi. my concern, however, has simply been to foreground what is so often neglected or ignored in discussions of ‘the trade union bureaucracy,’ namely bureaucracy as a form of social relations. to use an imperfect analogy, this is no more an alibi for union officials than marx’s theory of the capitalist mode of production is an alibi for capitalists. the more bureaucratic a union is, the more bureaucratic its officialdom. but we should be more careful about making sweeping generalizations about union officialdoms than some radical theorists have been. that said, there is plenty of historical evidence that as collective bargaining relations become more established, giving rise to or strengthening union bureaucracy as discussed above, unions tend to acquire (more) full-time officers and staff. three examples will illustrate the pattern. as local contracts between craft unions and employers spread in the us and canada at the end of the nineteenth century these unions began to hire full-time ‘business agents’ to administer their contracts. as craig heron (1996) puts it, these staff, along with the top officers and organisers of the craft unions, developed into an officialdom which began to develop a concern with protecting the union organization, its assets, its procedures, and its contractual obligations, as well as their own status and salaries. by denying access to central strike funds or ordering strikers back to work, these full-time officials sometimes put brakes on workers’ anger and resentment (p.32).14 14 see also heron (1999) and green (1980, p.35-40). what is trade union bureaucracy? | 147 half a century later, the stabilization in the us and canada of collective bargaining between employers and industrial unions that had recently become more bureaucratic also brought with it an expansion of union officialdom; the need to process grievances within the new mandatory grievance and arbitration systems was an important reason for this growth (heron, 1996, p.80; green, 1980, p.187). in south africa, after the passage of the 1995 labour relations act, which established a new mode of industrial legality, the officialdom of the congress of south african trade unions swelled with the development of a layer of fulltime shop stewards (appolis and sikwebu, 2003). many more similar cases could be cited. the development of an extensive union officialdom is significant for a union movement. regardless of their ideological outlooks or personal commitments, full-time officials (whether officers or union staff) have material conditions that are objectively different from those of the members they are supposed to serve.15 they do not share workers’ working conditions. they are often more highly-paid than rank-and-file members and lay officials. full-time officials are only indirectly affected by employer attacks on wages and working conditions. full-time officials who deal with management on a regular basis are particularly subject to employer efforts to enlist them in efforts to limit work stoppages, get workers to accept managerial control on the job, motivate workers to work harder, and the like. these material conditions create a real tendency for full-time officials to be less sensitive to the realities of workers’ lives on the job and more attuned to management’s desires than are rank-and-file workers. this is true even when a union is an insecure organization with very few full-time officials and meagre funds. to the degree that serving as a full-time official actually becomes an occupation rather than a temporary commitment, this existence cultivates a different outlook. as the welsh radical pamphlet the miners’ next step observes, full-time officers become ‘”trade unionists by trade” and their profession demands certain privileges’ (anonymous, 1912, p.3), or at least tends to. for full-time officials who can contemplate remaining full-timers for years, the union ‘constitutes...a whole way of life – their day to day function, formative social relationships with peers and superiors on the organisational ladder, a potential career, and, on many occasions, a social meaning, a raison d’être.’ preserving this existence imposes its own imperatives: 15 this is also true for part-time officers (and other union members who are allowed time away from work for union activity), though obviously to a much lesser extent. 148 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism to maintain themselves as they are, the whole layer of officials must, first and above all, maintain their organizations. it is thus easy to understand how an irresistible tendency emerges on the part of the trade union officials... to treat their organizations as ends in themselves, rather than as the means to defend their memberships – to come to conflate the interests of the organizations upon which they depend with the interests of those they ostensibly represent (brenner, 1985, p.45). the material need to preserve the union in order to continue as a full-time official, which gives rise to the tendency to treat the union institution as an end in itself, is just as significant for a radical who takes office because of a sincere desire to further the fight for workers’ rights as it is for someone who becomes a full-timer as a way to boost their income and status and escape from highly alienated labour. an individual official may, of course, remain personally more committed to the workers she serves than to defending the union as an institution. the case of national union of mineworkers’ leader arthur scargill in the 1984-1985 miners’ strike in britain springs to mind.16 brenner’s point is not that all full-time officials are always more concerned with the institutional fate of unions than they are with workers’ interests. rather, it is that the officialdom as a whole cannot reproduce itself without preserving union institutions. there is more than one way to do this. an orientation to preserving union institutions is often accompanied with overtly class-collaborationist ideology, but need not be. it does not necessarily translate into a refusal by full-time officials to mobilize workers in struggles that defy the law to some extent – consider the political strikes organized by leaders of the canadian auto workers (caw) and most public sector unions during the days of action in province of ontario in the second half of the 1990s (camfield, 2000) and the efforts by leaders of the british columbia division of cupe to organize sympathy strikes to support striking teachers in 2005 (camfield, 2009). the central issue is that when union officialdoms become consolidated social layers their continued existence depends on the security of union institutions. consequently, the actions of full-time officials as a group will be influenced – and, in the last instance, determined by – the goal of preserving these institutions. this allows us to pinpoint why union officialdom as a social layer is a fourth source of union bureaucracy. motivated by the need to preserve union institutions in order to reproduce themselves as an officialdom, 16 see callinicos and simons (1985), which combines an appreciation of scargill’s strengths with observations about his political weaknesses. what is trade union bureaucracy? | 149 full-time officials tend to organize union activity in ways that reflect their distinct interests as a group. officials tend to favour ways of functioning that give themselves a great deal of decision-making power, at the expense of democratic rank-and-file control. as the miners’ next step puts it, of the privileges demanded by ‘”trade unionists by trade”...the greatest of all these are plenary powers...every inroad the rank and file make on this privilege lessens the power and prestige’ (anonymous, 1912, p.3-4) of full-time officials, who for this reason have an interest in opposing such democratizing moves. in short, full-time officials tend to organize union activity in ways that enhance their own sway. these are bureaucratic when they involve formal rules that limit the ability of members to determine the methods and goals of union action. this is a general tendency of the behaviour of full-time officials where union officialdom has become consolidated as a social layer; obviously there are individual exceptions. when this kind of practice does arise, it can be challenged by the influence of active members firmly committed to democratic methods designed to limit the power of full-timers, such as the radical welsh workers who a century ago proposed the miners’ next step. there are undoubtedly full-time officials who are so deeply committed to membership control that they seek to develop rather than curtail it. nevertheless, full-time officials do generally tend to promote bureaucratic functioning rooted in their distinct interests as a social layer. contrary to a common assumption, the sway of the officialdom is not always exercised against militancy or radicalism. full-time officials may try to advance one or both within unions within a bureaucratic framework. this can be seen, for example, in the militancy of the justice for janitors campaign initiated by leaders of the service employees international union (tait, 2005, p.188-189, 200-202) and the caw’s left turn in the second half of the 1990s.17 however, as a theoretical generalization, we can say that once a union officialdom has crystallized as a social layer it will tend to display institutional conservatism. the strength of this conservatism varies enormously, and is influenced by a range of factors including the extent of union bureaucratization, the degree of unions’ institutional security, the intensity of class struggle and the ideology of the union in question. the conservatism of union officials is not found only in stable contemporary unions in advanced capitalist countries; it 17 this turn and the caw’s subsequent evolution have not yet received adequate study, but see gindin (1995) and allen (2006). recognizing the possibility of bureaucratic militancy implies a questioning of the notion (present in voss and sherman [2000]) that militant mobilization is evidence of a challenge to bureaucratic unionism. 150 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism has manifested itself in far more fragile and less bureaucratic organizations. for example, late nineteenth-century us and canadian craft unions had weak legal rights, few officials and small bank accounts. yet, as discussed above, their full-time officials were increasingly preoccupied with the defence of union institutions as well as contract obligations and their own perks. in addition to noting the tendency to a conservatism based on the preservation of union institutions, we can also conclude that full-time officials tend to favour their own control within union organizations, thereby promoting bureaucracy. analyzing unions today where does this theory direct our attention in the analysis of unions? first, by highlighting the importance of formal rules that limit workers’ ability to determine the character and goals of their actions and which they themselves are not easily able to change, this approach directs our attention to the double-sided nature of collective agreements and labour law. both are often sources of union rights as well as restrictions on collective action. for example, many basic features of us and canadian labour law qualify as bureaucratic. in the us, the law prohibits sympathy (‘secondary’) strikes (lynd and gross, 2008). it also bans ‘bargaining over managerial decisions “which lie at the core of entrepreneurial control”’ and makes grievance arbitration ‘semicompulsory’ (klare, 1978, p.337). canadian law goes even further in its imposition of bureaucracy. it makes labour board certification the only permissible route to union recognition, bans recognition strikes, requires grievance arbitration procedures and (in most jurisdictions) a pre-strike compulsory conciliation process, contains a blanket prohibition of mid-contract, political and sympathy strikes, makes management rights clauses in contracts mandatory and requires the rand formula for union security (fudge and tucker, 2001, p.302-315). such instances of bureaucracy are widely accepted by unionists, precisely because they are mandated by law. as philip corrigan and derek sayer (1981) have argued, ‘integral to the law is a moral topography, a mapping of the social world which normalises its preferred contours – and, equally importantly, suppresses or at best marginalises other ways of seeing and being’ (p.33) and, i would add, doing. although many instances of bureaucracy stemming from law and contract have the straightforward effect of making it difficult for workers to engage in collective action against employers and governments, some – such as exclusive representation rights and the rand what is trade union bureaucracy? | 151 formula’s requirement that all workers covered by a union contract pay union dues – have effects on workers’ power that are more complicated. second, this theoretical perspective underscores the significance of others kinds of formal rules restricting the activity of unionized workers, chiefly those found in union constitutions and other union rules. in both the us and canada, bureaucracy is widespread in the form of organizational structures and practices at all levels – from locals all the way up to the top labour centrals – that make it difficult or impossible for unionized workers to determine what their organizations will do and how they will do it. in these countries, this kind of bureaucracy is not the result of the political administration of labour by state power. us laws in fact guarantee many union members a number of basic democratic rights (benson, 1979) while canadian law and administration impose very few requirements on the internal organization of unions (lynk, 2002). much more significant as an influence on union organizational structures in the us and canada is the pervasiveness of the separation of conception from execution in social life. the working-class movement is affected by the norms of societies in which organizations are generally understood to be properly run by small numbers of managers and ‘experts,’ with little or no popular participation. this approach has been unchallenged in the most influential political traditions within us and canadian unions. what heron (1996) writes of the politics of canadian union officials in the years after the second world war was also true of the outlook of many of their us counterparts (mills, 2001): they ‘had always emphasized the importance of expertise and centralized bureaucratic administration, rather than direct rank-and-file initiative’ (p.80). following the legal entrenchment of unions and collective bargaining in the us in the 1930s and in canada in the following decade, newlyconsolidated labour officialdoms put a stronger bureaucratic stamp on union organization. the perspective advanced in this article broadens our understanding of what union bureaucracy is. bureaucracy is not a group of leaders. nor is it an external cage in which unions are trapped. rather, as a mode of existence of social relations, it is, to varying degrees, a significant quality of unionism itself – to be precise, of particular forms of union praxis in specific times and places. where union bureaucracy exists, it is usually deeply internal to unions as workingclass movement organizations. for this reason, ‘resolutionary radicalism’ at union meetings and conferences and the denunciation of bureaucrats offer no escape from bureaucracy, which can only be 152 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism weakened through the promotion of forms of action whose character and goals are determined by workers themselves. self-activity, self-organization and democratic control from below are central to anti-bureaucratic unionism, in which the conception and execution of union activity are brought together through workers’ active participation in and control over their organisations. conditions which are conducive to this kind of unionism and practices that foster its development deserve study. references allen, b. (2006). inside the caw jacket. new socialist, 57, 18-20 anonymous (1912). the miners’ next step. being a suggested scheme for the reorganisation of the federation. tonypandy: unofficial reform committee. retrieved from http://www.llgc.org.uk/ymgyrchu/ llafur/1926/mns.pdf appolis, j. & sikwebu, d. (2003). pressing challenges facing the south african labour movement: an interview with john appolis and dinga sikwebu. in t. bramble & f. barchiesi (eds.), rethinking the labour movement in the ‘new south africa.’ (p. 205-225). aldershot: ashgate. barker, c. (2001). robert michels and the ‘cruel game.’ in c. barker, a. johnson & m. lavalette (eds.), leadership and social movements (p. 24-43). manchester: manchester university press. benson, h. (1979). democratic rights for union members. new york: association for union democracy. braverman, h. (1998). labor and monopoly capital. new york: monthly review. brenner, r. (1985). the paradox of social democracy: the american case. in m. davis, f. pfeil & m. sprinker (eds.), the year left: an american socialist yearbook (p. 32-86). london: verso. brissenden, p.f. (1957). the iww: a study of american syndicalism. 2nd ed. new york: russell and russell. callinicos, a. (1995). socialists in the trade unions. london: bookmarks. callinicos, a. & simons, m. (1985). the great strike: the miners’ strike of 1984-5 and its lessons. london: socialist worker. camfield, d. (2000). assessing resistance in harris’s ontario, 19951999. in m. burke, c. mooers & j. shields (eds), restructuring and resistance: canadian public policy in an age of global capitalism (p. 306-317). halifax: fernwood. ——— (2002). class, politics and social change: the remaking of the working class in 1940s canada. unpublished doctoral dissertation, york university, toronto. what is trade union bureaucracy? | 153 ——— (2009). sympathy for the teacher: labour law and transgressive workers’ collective action in british columbia, 2005. capital and class, 33 (3), 81-107. castoriadis, c. (1988a). modern capitalism and revolution. in d.a. curtis (ed.), political and social writings (vol. 2, p. 225-315). minneapolis: university of minnesota press. ——— (1988b). proletariat and organization, i. in d.a. curtis (ed.), political and social writings (vol. 2, p. 193-222). minneapolis: university of minnesota press. ——— (1993). recommencing the revolution. in d.a. curtis (ed.), political and social writings (vol. 3, p. 27-55). minneapolis: university of minnesota press. cliff, t. (1960). trotsky on substitutionism. retrieved from http://www. marxists.org/archive/cliff/works/1960/xx/trotsub.htm corrigan, p. & sayer, d. (1981) how the law rules: variations on some themes in karl marx. in b. fryer, a. hunt, d. mcbarnet & b. moorhouse (eds.), law, state and society (p. 21-53). london: croom helm. coupé, a. (ed.). (2007). qu’est-ce que l’union syndicale solidaires? paris: éditions de l’archipel. retrieved from http://solidaires.org/img/pdf/ union_syndicale_solidaires.pdf darlington, r. (2010). the rank-and-file versus bureaucracy analysis of intra-union relations. unpublished paper presented at the european social science history conference, ghent. darlington, r. & upchurch, m. (2012). a reappraisal of the rank-and-file versus bureaucracy debate. capital and class, 36 (1), 77-95. early, s. (2011). the civil wars in us labor: birth of a new workers’ movement or death throes of the old? chicago: haymarket. edsforth, r. (1987). class conflict and cultural consensus: the making of a mass consumer society in flint, michigan. new brunswick: rutgers university press. edwards, r. (1979). contested terrain: the transformation of the workplace in the twentieth century. new york: basic books. fudge, j. & tucker, e. (2001). labour before the law: the regulation of workers’ collective action in canada, 1900-1948. don mills: oxford university press. gall, g. (2010, february 10). the engineering construction workers’ strike. new socialist webzine. retrieved from http://www.newsocialist.org gindin, s. (1995). the canadian auto workers: the birth and transformation of a union. toronto: james lorimer. goody, j. (2006). the theft of history. cambridge: cambridge university press. 154 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism gouldner, a. (1955). metaphysical pathos and the theory of bureaucracy. american political science review, 49, 496-507. graeber, d. (2006). beyond power/knowledge: an exploration of the relation of power, ignorance and stupidity. retrieved from http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/lsepubliclecturesandevents/ pdf/20060525gra eber.pdf green, j. (1980). the world of the worker: labor in twentieth-century america. new york: hill and wang. heron, c. (1996). the canadian labour movement: a short history. toronto: james lorimer. heron, c. (1999). review of the book red flags and red tape: the making of a labour bureaucracy, by m. leier. labor history, 40, 410-412. hyman, r. (1989). the political economy of industrial relations: theory and practice in a cold climate. basingstoke: macmillan. hyman, r. (2012). will the real richard hyman please stand up? capital and class, 36 (1), 151-164. kapferer, n. (1980). commodity, science and technology: a critique of sohn-rethel. in p. slater (ed.), outlines of a critique of technology (p. 74-95). london: ink links. kelly, j. (1988). trade unions and socialist politics. london: verso. klare, k.e. (1978). judicial deradicalization of the wagner act and the origins of modern legal consciousness, 1937-1941. minnesota law review, 62, 265-339. leier, m. (1991). which side are they on? some suggestions for the labour bureaucracy debate. international review of social history, 36, 412-427. lenin, v.i. (1920). preface to the french and german editions. imperialism, the highest stage of capitalism. retrieved from www.marxists.org/ archive/lenin/works/1916/imphsc/pref02.htm lukács, g. (1971). history and class consciousness: studies in marxist dialectics. london: merlin lynd, s. (1996). introduction. in s. lynd (ed.), ‘we are all leaders’: the alternative unionism of the early 1930s (p. 1-26). urbana: university of illinois press. lynd, s. & gross, d. (2008). labor law for the rank and filer: building solidarity while staying clear of the law. oakland: pm press. lynk, m. (2002). union democracy and the law in canada. just labour, 1, 16-30. mandel, e. (1992). power and money: a marxist theory of bureaucracy. london: verso. michels, r. (1966). political parties: a sociological study of the oligarchical tendencies of modern democracy. new york: the free press. what is trade union bureaucracy? | 155 mills, c.w. (2001). the new men of power: america’s labor leaders. urbana: university of illinois press. neocleous, m. (1996). administering civil society: towards a theory of state power. london and new york: macmillan and st. martin’s. perusek, g. (1995). classical political sociology and union behavior. in g. perusek & k. worcester (eds), trade union politics: american unions and economic change, 1960s-1990s (p. 57-76). new jersey: humanities. post, c. (1999). ernest mandel and the marxian theory of bureaucracy. in g. achcar (ed.), the legacy of ernest mandel (p. 119-151). verso: london. post, c. (2011). exploring working-class consciousness: a critique of the theory of the ‘labour aristocracy.’ historical materialism, 18 (4), 3-38. rinehart, j. (2006). the tyranny of work: alienation and the labour process. 5th ed. toronto: thomson/nelson. schmidt, j. (2000). disciplined minds: a critical look at salaried professionals and the soul-battering system that shapes their lives. lanham: rowman and littlefield. seaford, r. (2012). monetisation and the genesis of the western subject. historical materialism, 20 (1), 78-102. sohn-rethel, a. (1978). intellectual and manual labour: a critique of epistemology. atlantic highlands, nj: humanities. tait, v. (2005). poor workers’ unions: rebuilding labor from below. cambridge, ma: south end. thompson, p. (1989). the nature of work: an introduction to debates on the labour process. 2nd ed. houndmills: macmillan. voss, k. & sherman, r. (2000). breaking the iron law of oligarchy: union revitalization in the american labor movement. american journal of sociology, 106 (2), 303-349. weber, m. (1952). the essentials of bureaucratic organization: an ideal-type construction. in r.k. merton (ed.), reader in bureaucracy (p. 18-27). glencoe: the free press. 156 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism 264 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism book review the devil’s milk: a social history of rubber, by john tully. new york, ny: monthly review press, 2011. $24.95 us. isbn: 987-1-58367-231-0. pages: 1-480. reviewed by james braun1 drawing upon marx’s famous formulation of commodity fetishism, john tully seeks to uncover “the whole buried world of social and ecological relations” that have historically constituted the production of rubber and its derivative products (p.359). rubber, tully argues, is an indispensable commodity for the industrial age, facilitating revolutions in transportation, sexuality and communications (p.41-45). its myriad industrial applications and unique properties meant that government and industry were prepared to go to great lengths to secure a reliable supply, abusing workers and ecologies in their wake. from the amazon rubber boom to the rise of synthetic rubber production in world war 2, tully documents the history of rubber production and processing “inextricably bound up with the rise of capitalism, imperialism and modernity” (p.345). although tully presents his book as “a social history of rubber,” his methodology focuses narrowly on labour history. from the subtitle, one might expect a comprehensive investigation of how rubber transformed everyday life from the viewpoint of “ordinary” people. the book hints at interesting directions such a history might proceed, but only ever briefly engages with them. the development of the rubber condom and its associated controversies suggests transformations in sexual and religious politics (p.44-45). likewise, the pneumatic tire had crucial implications for the ascendancy of truck transport over rails, but the political and social contests that facilitated this change are glossed over (p.139-40). the subjects of tully’s history are primarily workers, and their lives away from the worksite are not given much consideration. most of the book documents in detail the brutal labour practices that characterized (and continue to characterize) the rubber industry. wild rubber tapping in the amazon and the congo, driven by extortion and 1 james braun is an m.a. candidate at the institute of political economy, carleton university. he can be reached at jbraun@connect.carleton.ca. book review: the devil's milk | 265 sadism, was supplanted by hevea plantations and indentured labour in malaya, liberia and indochina, and ultimately synthetic production in world war 2 after japan captured most of the world’s natural rubber supply. his study of rubber production and processing begins with the early industrial revolution in britain, but is primarily focused on the birth and growth of the pneumatic tire industry in akron, ohio. despite rubber’s many applications, this is a reasonable limit on scope; as tully notes, by the end of world war 1, akron tire plants processed roughly forty percent of the world’s supply of raw rubber (p.138). his discussion of worker resistance is somewhat uneven. resistance tactics in akron, indochina and auschwitz are discussed at length, whereas one is left with the unlikely impression that indigenous workers in the congo and the amazon hardly fought against their oppression. the methodological challenges of writing history from the perspective of rubber tappers or plantation labourers are obvious; nevertheless, a social history should seek to highlight the agency of its subjects and to make visible the world as they understood it, not to merely paint them as the passive victims of forces from above. tully makes good use of tran tu binh’s memoir, a seminary-educated communist organizer who worked as a coolie “in order to carry out communist agitation among the michelin estate laborers” in indochina, but such first-hand accounts are exceedingly rare (p.239-40). innovative readings of other types of sources would shed a much-needed light on these hidden histories, a task crucial to tully’s project. among tully’s admirable achievements is to bridge the histories of colonial rubber extraction and metropolitan rubber processing. imperialism is a key theme of his work; at each stage in the rubber industry’s development, political and economic power intertwines transnationally to secure the rubber supply so vital to industrial modernity. among the more notable examples: british capital and peruvian desperation to assert sovereignty in the putomayo valley facilitated julio césar arana’s murderous rubber fiefdom (p.90-100). leopold ii of belgium’s instincts for political aggrandizement and financial enrichment coincide in his reign of terror in the congo (p.102-103). strikebreaking tactics developed by firestone in akron are used against plantation workers in malaya (p.273). ig farben’s collusion with the third reich creates legal complications for us efforts to develop synthetic rubber during the second world war, via farben’s agreements with standard oil (p.322-323). throughout this history, capital operates both as a productive and constraining force, both feeding the ravenous resource appetites of metropolitan industry and frustrating the efforts of those who would put a more “human face” on the labour processes involved. 266 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism given the importance of the colonized world in this book, there is space in his analysis to interrogate the coloniality of processes that brought rise to the rubber industry. the narrative he sketches in chapter one, of rubber as a mesoamerican article of ritual and curiosity transformed by european science and rationalism into a utilitarian commodity for industry, should be familiar to post-colonialists and other critics of modernity. the foundations of this rationalism have been thoroughly dissected, but tully does not engage with those critiques. rubber fetishism is described briefly as a cultural aberration on rubber’s march to utilitarian respectability, but could be used as an avenue to explore ongoing affective relationships to rubber (p.45-46). implicit in tully’s discussion of worker resistance in malaya is an acceptance of a normative, eurocentric conceptualization of economic organization. tully describes how trade unions and strikes emerged from “primitive protests” such as assaults on overseers and desertion, but he misses how this tactical evolution normalizes the relations of the capitalist wage economy imposed by european imperialism (p.260-270). in some respects, tully has done for rubber much of what sidney mintz did for sugar. in highlighting “the social character of the commodity of rubber,” (p.20) he demonstrates the crucial and brutal relationship between the metropolis and periphery that produces industrial capitalism. in other words, metropolitan machinery would not run without a steady stream of peripheral resources. 978-1-926958-01-9 151 the faces of austerity kyle hamilton philippines: a culture of impunity confronting afp soldiers, lanao del sur, autonomous region of muslim mindanao, philippines. election day in the philippines (may 10, 2010) a local marano woman right, confronts an armed forces philippines soldier looking for answers regarding a fight that took place inside a polling precinct only minutes before. the faces of austerity 152 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research couple in the green cart, manila, philippines. a young couple is found sleeping as the city comes to life for another day. the green cart is their home which serves as their bed and carries all their possessions. a common site throughout metro manila, a city where poverty is the norm and many are forced to live in such circumstances. 153 boy on makeshift raft – manila, philippines. young boy wades through garbage on a river in hopes of recycling his way out of abject poverty. the faces of austerity 154 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research girl in her doorway smokey mountain, manila philippines. young girl stands in the doorway of her home, which is constructed out of discarded spring mattresses. smokey mountain is a landfill site in metro manila where thousands scavenge for their livelihood. 155 toronto: g8/g20 summit flower offering, toronto, canada. peaceful protesters on the front lines offer police flowers in exchange for dropping their heavy arms. the faces of austerity 156 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research protester sitting on yonge st. toronto, canada. a protester peacefully confronts a wall of riot police in downtown toronto as world leaders gather only steps away to commence the g20 summit. 157 sitting protestors, toronto, canada. protestors join hands and sing to win the hearts of police and passers by. one man’s shirt reads, “i love you and i forgive you”. the faces of austerity 158 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research peaceful protesting, toronto, canada. as protestors marched down the streets of toronto, multiple police blockades were set up at each intersection, preventing protestors from gaining access to the secure area where world leaders gathered for the g20 summit. whole book pdf the development of capitalism and the subjugation of native women in northern canada ron bourgeault the subject of this paper is the subjugation of. native (indian and half-breed) women in northern and western canada as a result of the institution of capitalism under the aegis of the fur trade. the racial, colonial and class divisions which were imposed upon native women resulted in a form of subjugation which needs to be differentiated from that affecting euro-canadian women. in this paper i will deal with some of the historical background concerning native women and changes in their role during the development of capitalism in what is now considered northern canada. i intend to establish the basis of class and racial divisions, together with colonial relations that resulted from the particular form of exploitation and oppression of native women within the fur trade of the hudson's eay basin. the oppression of native women (indian and !*etis) can only be understood and dealt with if one first comes to terms with the historical development of their class, colonial and national (racial) status. it has been a common belief that the native population as a whole has somehow been isolated from the history of capitalism in this country and, hence, class relations, and, consequently, that their oppression is somehow the result of their being disadvantaged in relationship to the rest of society. in addition to this, there is a commonly held belief that the indian act as a piece of legislation has existed historically as a means of democratically defining for the benefit of indian people who they are as a people; and that if it did not exist the people would have long ago become assimilated into the greater 'white' canadian society. the indian act has never been, however, a guarantor of the native heritage, and to focus almost exclusively on this piece of legislation in an analysis of the position of native women in contemporary canadian society, as many women in the women's movement do, cannot give us any insight into the history of the struggle against racism and the struggle for emancipation from colonial, class and sexual oppression, nor the long standing resistance to assimilation mounted by native women. although northern native women have their own particular 110 history, their oppression is not something that is peculiar to their circumstances or territory. rathe., as with all women, they are, and have been for centuries, incorporated into a broader world system in which this oppression takes place. however, their subjugation, as differentiated from that of european and euro-canadian women, occurred under a condition of colonialism. this is an important difference even now since it has resulted in the existence of national or racial oppression. the oppression of women who have been living under a state of colonialism is different from that of those who are oppressed within colonizing societies. this is not a question of antagonism; but, rather, a difference that will probably force a self-determining or autonomous relationship to exist between native and euro-canadian women as the former become more organized. first contact the penetration of eritish mercantilism into the hudson's bay basin during the 17th century heralded the beginning of the class/national struggle of the indian peoples within that region. it also marked the creation of exploitable divisions between indian men and women, f^ercantil ism was interested in only one thing, fur as a commodity for the european market. the resident indian population did not prove, however, to be a source of labour that would produce or deliver that commodity in the consistent manner required by the merchant traders. commodity production for exchange was no part of the economic activity of the non-capitalist hunting, gathering, and foraging societies of the indian people of the hudson's bay basin. it was also impossible to introduce another source of labour into the territory; as fur production required the labour skills that the indian ill population had acquired over centuries. it was, therefore, incumbent upon mercantilism to alter the relations of production in the indian societies. as primitive communist societies, they were both classless and egalitarian. as classless societies, there existed no internal social division of labour beyond that of sex and age. there was no class/group of non-labourers existing solely to appropriate the surplus labour of labouring individuals or groups within the society. as a primitive commixiist society the appropriation of surplus labour was communal , but the productive mechanisms and social relations of production could be called backward or undeveloped. indian societies were egalitarian in the sense that individuals (or groups) held power and influence over what and how goods were to be produced and where and how they were to be distributed. in this sense, individuals within their respective societies were able to control the conditions of their work and production for the communal use of the whole society. although divisions of labour existed that were based upon sex, what women did, or women's work, was complementary to that of men. it was not deemed to be of lesser importance. the fact that women were able to control the conditions of their own work and production made, as leacock says (1981:13-29, 133-182), for egalitarian relations with men. the form of egalitarian relations varied, of course, from group to group depending upon the objective conditions of natural environment and the level of development of the productive forces. economic conquest the process of transforming the indian population into commodity producers involved imposing one mode of production upon another. in 112 order to accomplish this, it was necessary to alter or change the system of producing goods for their own internal use into the producing of goods for trade or barter. internal social relations among the people were altered, inequalities were created between women and men, and unequal external relations were established between indian and european. the imposition of a foreign economic system upon a national, in this case, an indigenous, group was the substance of colonial relations; it was also the way in which one people "conquered" another. in the case of the northern indian people it was not military, but economic, conquest. merchant capital did not necessarily totally destroy non-capitalist societies, supplanting them with the capitalist mode of production. as in europe, a free labour market was required in the interest of capital accumulation. merchant capital was quite compatible with different non-capitalist modes of production, as long as it could gain control of them and alter their productive mechanisms to what was required (marx, 1977b: 326-27) . [1] i would argue that there is a parallel to be considered between the establishment of feudal production in latin america (as explained by laclau, 1971) and what was established during the dominant presence of mercantilism in northern canada. i do not mean to suggest, of course, that the situation today is exactly the same. laclau argues that the exploitation of latin america peasantry increased along with demands by the world market and this is certainly the case with the indians of northern canada. [2] with the advent of capitalism, the indian came to be bound to particular outposts, harvesting wildlife no longer for personal consumption but as a commodity to be exchanged. in the course of becoming a commodity producer, the indian adopted from the merchant 113 capitalists new instruments of work such as the gun, traps, knives, and axes. although they owned their means of production, purchasing them with the money they received for their furs, they did not control them. the indians were kept from reproducing or repairing their own tools of work, tasks which remained in the hands of the merchant capitalists. in this manner, the production of the indians was ultimately controlled. they did not, then, act as totally independent producers. land became a subject of their labour process the working of the land for vriat existed naturally in the production of fur (marx, 1977a: 174-76; meillassoux, 1972:103). the manner in which the surplus labour of the indian was extracted in the production of fur determined all relations of existence. the social structure that emerged, the restructured nature of relationships between indian women and men, the form of colonialism that developed and the nature and form of the state that emerged within the fur trade, all were dependent upon the mode of extraction of the surplus labour (marx, 1977b: 791; marx, 1977a:209). since merchant capital was not interested in completely altering indian society, much of what appeared to be the 'traditional' economy or subsistence economy remained intact. the reason for this was that merchant capital was not interested in assuming the costs of the reproduction of the labour force. in this manner, the subsistence economy of the indian, and that included internal social relations of production (women's egalitarian inter-relationships with men), cort:nued to meet the ccsts of social reproduction of the labour force. hence, much of what was primitive communism, now no longer independent, ves allowed to reproduce itself and became a facilitating mechanism by vfiich indian labour was exploited. 114 i indian women within egalitarian society there are many ongoing debates concerning women's actual status within primitive communism or egalitarian society (see, for eg. leacock, 1981; reed, 1975; godelier, 1978) and whether or not men did hold power and influence over women's lives. some maintain that men dominated women and that this domination has its roots within innate characteristics of both men and women. quite frankly, there is not much to suggest that there is anything innate within the human species that predetermines their social behaviour. if, in fact, within different stages or forms of primitive communism, men did hold decision making power over women (in relation to certain tasks) , then, like the issue of female autonomy, male dominated inter-relationships must be considered within the context of the nature of the egalitarian society. in other words, if we reject the idea of domination as being innate, we would attempt to explain it in its social context. why did men play a predominant role in certain tasks? male domination of women in these cases may or may not have been more significant than in situations in which domination did not occur or those in which women held decision making powers. this article is not, however, concerned with sorting out the nature of egalitarian society and the autonomous role of women. its intent is to reflect upon the way in which indian women were in fact conquered and drawn into a class society and how male domination assumed a form that did not exist before the penetration of capitalism. now perhaps the question of male dominance in primitive communism could lead to another question. was it necessary for conquest to occur and male domination to be established that women's autonomy be exploited and then destroyed, or was it necessary just to establish the 115 conquering procedure through the use of males, with the result being the disintegration of primitive communism and the ensuing subjugation of women? if either was the case, what does it mean today in terms of strategy and tactics within the native movement? the egalitarian nature of northern indian society existed to the extent that all adults, both men and women, were mutually engaged in the socially necessary labour required for the reproduction of their society. as well, all adults participated equally in the distribution and consumption of the necessities of life. the autonomy of indian women existed to the extent that they had control over the conditions of their own work and over the distribution of what they produced within their society. women held power over what they produced and the work that women did was deemed to be as socially important as that of men. men did not have decision making powers over the work activities of women. women's social and economic power was held to be as valuable as that of men, even though they were engaged in sharing socially necessary labour (leacock, 1975:34). within the egalitarian society, indian women also enjoyed, as did men, sexual autonomy. women made decisions about their labour, and they held the same decision making power over their bodies. since they were not individually bound to nor dependent upon men, men did not hold any decision making powers over women's sexual lives, lb have sexual relationships with different men, before and after 'marriage,' was not seen as being out of the ordinary. parentage of children was not perceived as being all that important since children were considered to be the responsibility of the collective society. within egalitarian indian society, all individuals were as dependent upon the larger collective society as upon the varied forms 116 of family units. unlike the situation in class societies, where the family functions as an individual unit of production, the family in traditional indian society functioned as an integral part of the collective. the family as an economic unit of the collective society did not demand monogamy and, accordingly, women were not restricted through 'marriage.' relationships of 'marriage' between women and men were formed for the most part out of mutual domestic convenience. and, as the ensuing family formations, children for instance, existed as a unit in support of the greater collective society, they were not individual units responsible for their own individual livelihood (leacock, 1975:33). since women held mutual decision making powers with men over work and production within the collective society, they and their children were not economically or socially bound nor dependent upon men. divorce, for whatever reason, was arrived at through mutual recognition between women and men. abortion was considered to be a socially responsible act, with women having the right to self-administer if prospective children were seen as being an economic burden. the following description was written by an officer of the hudson's bay company in 1771; it is part of a general report on the social conditions of the indians during the fur trade: they have a very strange maxim of policy which is, obliging their women to procure frequent abortions by the use of a certain herb in this country, in order to ease themselves of the heavy burthen of a helples family (hbca, e2/7,7.9) . [3] what does all this mean in the everyday practical operation of egalitarian indian society? both men and women did in fact have particular tasks which they were required to execute for the general maintenance of the society. men did the majority of the hunting for 117 food and trapping for clothing, but women made clothes and prepared food. neither of these two 'types' of work was seen as being more important than the other. one did not hold a particular status at the expense of the other. as well, what was produced by particular people or individuals within the society was done for the use of the society as a whole. no individual, because of his or her skills, produced a good or a service and then exchanged it for something else that they might have needed. the fact that fur was eventually produced for exchange made that itan a commodity and it was considered to be the private property of the person who produced it. that was entirely different than producing fur for the use of individuals within the collective society. women and the development of class society the subjugation of indian women began when the collective economy in which they exercised their autonomy was changed. this change resulted from foreign domination which lead to the undermining or outright conquest of indian societies. tne change in the collective economy was signified by the specialisation of labour and the replacement of communal appropriation with individual production of goods or commodities for exchange. once this process is begun, the revenue from production of commodities becomes the private property of individuals. no longer does labour produce goods or services to be collectively used. eventually, individuals begin to lose control over the production, distribution, and use of the goods they produce. the existing division of labour within the collective society slowly becomes a part of the new productive process. since men were the primary producers of fur in the first place, as commodity production developed 118 they slowly assumed control over the production process. women, no longer utilizing the fur harvest for clothes or food, then began to lose control over the production process. their role became more that of support in the production of the exchange commodity. inevitably, the mutual relationship of men and women within the egalitarian society started to crumble, as did the egalitarian society itself (engels, 1975:233) . with the crumbling of collective society, the family no longer functioned as a productive unit of the egalitarian society. rather, it slowly became an independent economic unit in the production of commodities for exchange. as women's power diminished in relation to that of men, their developing dependent relationship as support workers eventually carried over to a dependent role within the family. this was facilitated by the development of the family as the primary unit of production under mercantile capitalism. as engels suggested (1975:221) women's socially necessary labour and their control over it, no longer was of equal value to that of men. it became exploitable and secondary to commodity production for exchange. the impact of mercantilism: economic conquest and the creation and imposition of class society on northern indian women the reality of merchant capital's first contact with the indian people around the coast of hudson's bay meant that the autonomous role of indian women was destroyed. the intent of merchant capital was the establishment of commodity production in which men worked for exchange and this necessitated destruction of the reciprocal relationship between women and men. with the development of colonial relations and the increasing 119 dependency of indian women upon men, some women considered it to be in their interest to advance themselves in relationships with european men. the european colonizers were only too willing to avail themselves of the indian women, especially since their position of equality with men provided the mercantilists with the opportunity to penetrate the communal society. indian women became a valuable commodity, exploited both politically and sexually in the conquest of indian society. the colonial subjugation of both indian men and women meant then, a double subjugation for indian women. in the early 1700's, the british wanted to move northward from york factory (where they had established themselves in the late 1600' s) to establish trade relations with the dene-chipewyan people. the british, through trading with the cree, captured a chipewyan woman whom they referred to as 'the slave woman.' their strategy was to familiarise the slave woman with the value of british goods and, once accomplished, use her as a means of penetrating and developing initial trade relations with the chipewyans. towards this end, the slave woman was deliberately kept within york factory for one year in order that she might comprehend the system of commodity trade goods and absorb the philosophy of private property. the slave woman was then sent throughout the interior where she organized four hundred chipewyan people for the first trade meeting. one hundred sixty of these were men who were present to conduct the trade negotiations. she organized and brought back to york factory some people to be trained in the selection and preparation of furs whirh w?r° of value for trade. as well, she arranged for men to be trained in the use of the rifle and other tools of work. the slave woman was so committed to the idea of developing trade between the chipewyan and the european that she made a solemn promise that she would not rest until 120 the whole of the interior dene people were delivered into a trade relationship with the british. so well did she understand the process of commodity production that was to be developed that, in return for her work, she requested only to be rewarded with a position for her brother — that he be made a trade captain. the following quotes are from the journal of the chief officer at york factory in 1716-17. the journal was kept as a means of recording how the british developed initial trading with the chipewyan people. it included as well comments on the death of the slave woman in 1717. the quotes serve to show the process of conquest and the utilisation of the power of women within indian society in order to facilitate that process : ...but these poor people have none but are forced to live by the bows and arrows and they cannot live a great many together, because they have nothing to subsist on but what they hunt but if please god when i have settled a trade amongst them and can bring what i am working upon to pass i will stop the trade with those indians for a year or two and lett them make ? on them and drive the cogg's to the devill.... ...the northern slave women departed her life after about seven weeks illness. the misfortune in loosing her will be very prejudical to the company's interests ...she was one of a very high spirit and of the firmest resolution that ever i see anybody in my days and of great courage and forecast also (endued) with an extraordinary vivacity of apprehension. readily taking anything right as was proposed to he and presently give her opinion whether it would doo or not. and i am sure the death of her was a very considerable loss to the company for the wintering here allmost 2 years with us and going one year to make the peace and being chief promoter and acter in it which has caus'd respect to her and carry'd allso a great sway among the indians.... as i have been writing about the slave woman [deceas'd] it will not be amiss to mention one thing. last june she gave away a little kettle as i had given her to carry with her when she went back into her country again. i (tax'd) her about it she said she had not gave it away. i sent to the indian as had it and fetched it aw3y and show' d it her. she told me was a iyer for he had stole it for she did not give it to him and said that her indians should kill me when i come to churchill river and did rise in such a passion as i never did see the like before and i 121 cuff d her ears for her but the next morning she came and cry'd to me and said she was a. fool and mad and told me that i was a father to them all and that she and all her indians would love me and i should never come to any harm. she had been very good ever since in giving me any information and always speaking in our praise to these indians and her own. we buried her ab't 4 a clock... (hbca, b239/a/2, 3, f .28-30,23) . the journal clearly reveals the power and status that the slave woman had within chipewyan society. although the interpretation given by the writer hints that she may have been exceptional, her exceptionality is really a natural outgrowth of egalitarian society. individualism and exceptional ism existed, but within the context of collectivism. making use of the slave woman, or any other person for that matter, to develop contacts to facilitate commodity exchange was not sufficient for conquest. a form of subservience and personalized property had to be created; hence the strategy of first developing trade, then, once dependency was established, stopping trade "and drive the eogg's to the eevill." this destroyed any notion of mutuality in trading and provided the basis for the development of a situation not unlike the lord-peasant relationship of feudalism. [4] in the situation of the slave woman, the kettle was symbolic of whether or not she was going to accept the idea of private property and ties to the european trader or whether she would cling to the notion of communal property. her being hit was symbolic of her new domination by a man and a european. as well as being exploited pol itically by the european, indian women were also exploited sexually. at no time throughout the mercantile fur trade were european women allowed into the fur trade territory of rupert's land and the ensuing shortage of women made indian women a valuable sexual commodity to the european colonizers. it was a 122 common practice for the resident officers to have permanent, or even just casual, sexual relationships with influential indian women as a means of developing and maintaining trade relations with the surrounding indian groups. the following was an officer's comment in 1743 at moose factory concerning the importance of a particular indian woman to the continuation of trade at that post. she apparently lived for a period of time with the officer within the fort and had a child by him: ausiskashagan came in here hawling his sick wife on a sledge, relieved them with provisions—she having been brought up at albany s used to these comforts, as being of ye blood royal & has a child by mr. adams, is very industrious in catching martins, i having had above two hundred from her husband already & must use them with tenderness on acc't of ye comp' ys interest (hbca, b135/a/14,f .63-65). in addition, women were taken possession of as a form of concubine by the officers as a privilege of their class. the same privilege was, however, denied the european servant class. it was a privilege that was taken in much the same manner as a feudal lord would exhibit towards peasant women in europe. the following description of the relationship between indian women and the european resident merchant traders around the different posts was written around 1771 by an officer of the company who himself engaged in the same practices: no european women are allowed to be brought to hudson's bay, and no person is allowed to have any correspondence with the natives without the chief's orders. .. .however , the factors for the most part at proper times allows an officer to take in an indian lady to his apartment, but by no means or on any account whatever to harbour her within the fort at night. however, the factors keeps a bedfellow within the fort at all times, and have carried several of their children home as before observed (williams, 1969:248). in order for commodity production to develop, it was important that the communal family be destroyed. the social interrelationships in which surplus labour was appropriated collectively had to be terminated or ruptured. although the actual development and process of commodity 123 production contributed to its destruction, the communal family had to be dealt with directly by merchant capital. the fur trade post displaced the communal society (hence the establishment of a form of feudal society) by arranging that individual families or family units become dependent upon and bound to each fur trade post for their existence. arrangements were made for the care of dependent women and children while the men were induced to go out and hunt or trap for trade, making it clear that women were no longer considered to be making a contribution to a collective society. in return for their maintenance, women were induced to contribute their labour to the upkeep of their respective posts. so what began to unfold was production by individual family units for the respective posts to which they were increasingly attached. women within these changing family units provided support work for the men and, at the same time, had their labour exploited in support work for each particular post. less than ten years after the chipewyan were drawn into fur production, the post of prince of wales was quite deliberately trying to displace the collective family: the indian which came here ye 22'd of last month went away with his wife in order to look for some deer, he leaving ? children by reason they would be a hindrance if he had taken them with him, he having been employed all this fall a making things necessary for our men which lay abroad this winter. so i think to entertain him he having a small family for to hunt for us this winter, also to knitt snow shoes & making indian shooes & other things is wanting for ye men in ye winter time & itt being usual to entertain an indian for ye same purpose (hbca, b42/a/5,f .7) . cx/er the years, indian women acted as support workers for their respective fur trading posts, making moccassins and snowshoes for the servants, preparing and drying meat and fish, etc. by the turn of the 19th century, indian women were doing much the same support work as they 124 had been forced into one hundred years earlier. this would continue for another hundred years. a description of women's post work was given in an 1802 report to london: we wish to remark that the women are deserving of some encouragement and indulgence from your honors, they clean and put into a state of preservation all beaver and otter skins brought by the indians undried and in bad condition. they prepare line for snow shoes and knit them also without which your honors servants could not give efficient opposition to the canadian traders. they make leather shoes for the men who are obliged to travel about in search of indians and furs and are useful in a variety of other instances, in short they are virtually your honors servants... (hbca, e239/b/79,f .39) . as the communal indian society continued to break down under commodity production, indian women gradually became more dependent upon men. the colonial situation presented an opportunity to some women seeking economic security or benefits from varied relationships with european men. if a woman was able to become a live-in companion or even a 'country wife' of a high officer or a living-out companion of any junior officers, the material benefits were considerably greater than that received as a peasant. the creation of the dependency conditions which forced women to seek these particular opportunities laid the basis for privileged positions and eventually class differences among indian women. to the officer class, maintaining an indian woman was considered a class privilege but, in reality, it was a hidden form of prostitution. as these same privileges were denied the servant or working class, the dependent relationship of indian women with working class european men became a more overt form of prostitution. to indian women, these relationships were, in part, an expression of their sexual autonomy but, within the colonial situation, it signified the creation of prostitution. the just-arrived officer reported in his journal at york factory in 1762, "that the worst erothel house in london is not so common a (stew) as the mens house in this factory was before i 125 put a stop to it" ihbca. b259/a/50, f.3-7). exiring the first one hundred years, mercantilism discouraged any formal family formations to arise around the posts outside of the indian society. the reason was that mercantilism did not require any form of a free labour market to develop outside the indian peasantry. in fact, that vas one of the reasons why european women were not brought into the country. family formations, either european or mixed, outside of the indians would have meant the growth of a labour pool that was not needed and, as well, the existence of non-productive families was considered a burden upon the trade. the capitalist labour market was to remain in europe while merchant capital exploited the indians as simple commodity producers. the age of f*ercantile nbnopoly competition: indian women and the creation of the labour market, 1760' s to 1821 the 1760' s until the turn of the 18th century was marked by the rapid inland penetration of mercantile capital through the aegis of the hudson's bay company and the northwest company. this was a continuation of the previous economic domination of what may be characterized as primitive commur.ist societies. this monopoly period was characterized by the further internal development of class and racial divisions, as well as an intensification of colonial relations with the indian population. as a result of the inland penetration, the costs of maintaining the post infrastructure and increased importation of european labour became astronomical. what began to emerge out of the double necessity to decrease overhead expenses and to retain labour within the service was the creation of a potential wage labour supply from within the fur 12 6 trade territory. inasmuch as mercantilism ves in need of a cheaper internal source of wage labour, there was also a long range interest in developing a national elite that would assist in the implementation of colonial rule. in addition to this, whatever other labour was needed had to be provided from outside. this was accomplished through intermarriage, which then created radical changes. the required elite could not be recruited from the indian population which was needed for commodity production. an internal labour market was encouraged from which mercantilism could draw wage labour when it was needed and to which it could expel labour when it was no longer necessary. this labour market was separate from the indian producers but was not intended to supplant them. cnce the labour market was established, it would reproduce itself through formal individual family structures and 'marriage.' the company began to realize the benefits of relaxing strictures on relations between european men and indian women. previously, family units outside of the indian community were not allowed and mixed-bloods born out of clandestine relationships between europeans and indian women were, as a matter of policy, to be treated as indians. now, however, male mixed-bloods were raised and recruited into the service of the company, as workers if they were born of the servant class and as a rising petty bourgeois elite if they were born of fathers in the officer class. as workers, they were used as cheaper labour than that of europeans and, as a petty elite, they were used in junior positions within the company to facilitate trade relationships and inland penetration. the petty elites were not considered to have the same class position as their fathers since they were "nationals" and the running of the fur trade was not to be entrusted to them. thus, there 127 was created a colonized native elite and wage labour class, which for reasons of class and race, were no longer to be considered as indians. nor were they allowed to be english. they were, as their colonizers, called them "half-breeds." with forced colonialism and dependency, indian women and increasing numbers of mixed-blood women found themselves in a position of having to take advantage of the system for their own individual benefit and well-being. native women (indian and mixed-blood) gradually partook or engaged, as the system demanded, in formalized individual relationships or family formations (as 'country wives' ) with european men. such relationships between ttetive women and european men, formed out of dependency and colonialism, further exacerbated class differences between native women. as well, the resident european officer class found it more fitting to their class position to take a mixed-blood woman as a companion rather than an indian woman. the following quote is an example of the situation in 1783 of the mixed-blood wife of an officer who made a request to london that their child be educated in britain. the correspondence also illuminates the strategy of creating a petty bourgeois elite through education: ...the request arises not from a sudden fit of affection from the infant but from a long-wished-for desire; from a duty i owe him, as well as from the affection i bare him, and i the more strongly wish it as his mother is the daughter of an englishman and has few or no indian friends to protect the child should any accident happen to me (hbca, all/4, f .208) . indian women and mixed-blood women born of the servant class were considered to be more suitable companions for the european working class. the distinction made between mixed-blood and indian women, either as developing petty elites or within the small working class, now took on a class nature, but one overlaid with racial divisions. 128 mixed-blood women were no longer, as was the case previously, to be considered as indians. as dependent women, their new role and class in relationship with european males did not, however, prepare them for thatlike their 'brothers' they were no longer indians nor were they considered to be english. so their new position as a native woman was that of a half-caste or half-breed. curing the fur trade, then, there emerged a new and interwoven structure of race and class. nothing was so revealing of the racist transformation of mixed-blood women as the educational system that was developed around some of the bigger posts at the turn of the 19th century. take as an example the instructions for education in 1807: ...education & religion should be imparted without distinction to the children of both sexes & that the female youth in particular should experience that delicacy & attention to their person their peculiar situation requires. native women as attendant on these young persons seem improper their society would keep alive the indian language & with it its native superstitions which ought to be obliterated from the mind with all possible care. it is therefore, humbly suggested that a female from england of suitable ability & good moral character accompany the school master (hbca, all/118, f. 2) . through education and the divorcing of mixed-blood women from their indian roots arose the anticipated elite class of women that would function as colonial companions for the resident british mercantile officers. as with their brothers, some mixed-blood women were sent to britain for higher level british education. the receiving of a british education prepared the half-breed elites ideologically as a national petty bourgeois class loyal to british colonial policies. but as non-white colonial nationals they were never allowed to be the equal of their british masters. for half-breed women, british education merely prepared them as class companions for the resident british colonial administrators . 123 the situation of indian or half-breed women within the forming wording class was quite different. the labour of i^fetive women within t. u e nixed family units became exploitable either as support work for the european men or directly as labour in and around the different posts. in this sense, native women were not divorced from their labour skills as long as the family units kept themselves outside of peasant society and their social relations of production. the age of british colonialism and imperialism: 1821-1870 the period from 1821, when the two mercantile companies merged, until 1870, when rupert's land was annexed to canada, was one in which formal british colonialism was established. the class formations and contradictions that developed during the era of monopoly competition started to crystallize after 1821, resulting in overt class/national struggles. the rise of national consciousness among the dominant ntetis population grew out of the class oppression and racial hierarchy that formed within the mercantile system. the hudson's bay company no longer exercised political power solely as an independent mercantile concern; but, rather, it came more closely under the control of the british parliament and colonial office. the company, in effect, became more directly an agent of british imperial interests. in turn, a political and state organization was created in assiniboia to deal with the developing internal class formations and divisions of labour in the interest of maintaining britain's imperial interests in the area. we have seen that merchant capital, from the 1780's to the 1820's, resulted in the creation of an internal capitalist labour market. the non-capitalist mode was not, however, destroyed. at this time, with the rise of industrial capital within britain, merchant iso capital in general, was no longer an independent or even the dominant form of capital. rather, it became a subordinate aspect of industrial capital within the developing capitalist mode of production. because merchant capital does not develop the productive mechanisms of societies in which it operates, its constant presence serves only, as marx pointed out ( 1977b: 327-28) , to underdevelop the society. relations of production within the fur trade were not allowed to change as long as merchant capital remained as the dominant form within the fur trade territory, and this was true even when merchant capital became merely an agent of industrial capital. as industrial capital continues to develop, the northern indian people continue to 'underdevelop.' whatever internal changes that came from the implementation of a capitalist mode of production and labour market the formation of a wage labour class and petty bourgeoisie did not serve to develop the society. rather, the class formations only became underdeveloped classes in an overall underdeveloped society. as simply one aspect of the overall development of capital, merchant capital's previously high rate of profit was reduced correspondingly. in the fur trade this led to greater exploitation of the northern indian population and the further erosion of their society, as the mercantile company needed to extract more of the resource for profit. after 1821, there was further systematic development of the labour market with all operations of the fur trade being centralized in the red river. individual family units were deliberately encouraged and marriages became more rigidly controlled. no longer were servants (labourers) or officers allowed to intermarry with indian women but, rather, only with half-breed women as per directive by a company official in 1811: 131 as the colony is at length set on foot & there is a prospect of civilization diffusing itself among us in a few years i would not advise you for the sake of the rising generation to consent to either officers or p^en contracting matrimonial connections unless with the daughters of englishmen & then only with the previous concurrence of the superintend ant (hbca, b239/b/82,f .9d) . both ftoman catholic and protestant churches became an integral part of the colonial structure. church-sanctioned marriages guaranteed the formalization of individual families as the basic unit needed for the reproduction of labour within the internal labour market and, as well, to formalized individual family units of production that operated out of the labour pool. native women outside of the peasantry became further subjugated in dependent relationships to men and further alienated from mutuality as the individual family increasingly became the basic unit of the developing class society. as well, more clearly demarcated class divisions among indian peasantry women, half-breed working class women, and petty bourgeois half-breed women developed. the half-breed surplus labour pool established in the red river provided the seasonal wage labourers needed to run the transportation boats (voyageurs) throughout the infrastructure, the seasonal and annual labourers to work around different posts within the interior and, as well, the plains buffalo hunters needed to produce surplus food (pemican) for distribution throughout the post infrastructure, f 5] as with other forms of labour coming out of the red river, the f*etis buffalo hunters were well organized around individual family units of production. in all cases, it was the women who did the support work within these units. if they were attached to different posts throughout the interior, then their labour also went tovards the support of their respective posts. for those women situated in the red river, labour went into the small plots of land the families were allowed to squat on iz2 as a means of supplementing their meagre wages. the buffalo hunt half-breed women and indian women, who were detached through marriage from their communal background, did the support work of stripping the buffalo carcass and preparing the pemican for trade. after 1821, the fur trade moved in a more systematic manner up the mckenzie river into what is now the northwest territories. the same patterns of conquering and quasi-feudal relations of production developed one hundred and fifty years previously were again implemented. slowly, dene women saw their egalitarian society and relations of production transformed into a class society. the formation of individual family units slowly came into being as the development of class society proceeded. the church and christianization was not imposed upon the indian population until around the 1840's. it was with christianity that the intellectual conquering of the northern indian finally took hold. as merchant capital became more an agent of industrial capital, its profits began to decrease and it was necessary to increase exploitation of the indian population in the production of fur. religion and the church were then used as a means of further facilitating and controlling the indian peasantry in the interests of a declining merchant capital. as well, the church functioned on behalf of industrial capital by extending its political sovereignty over rupert's land. within the indian peasantry, individual units of production had to be further exploited in the quest for profits and market. the dependent position of women was worsened, as was their exploitation within these units of production in a system whose productive mechanisms were even more 'underdeveloped.' in short, the church helped to define intellectually and to legitimate the existence of individual units of production within the indian 133 population. within the central operations of the red river, the company intentionally situated and developed a native or half-breed petit bourgeoisie in conjunction with the selkirk settlers and colonial administrative officers of the company. the half-breed petty bourgeoisie became commercially active by being contracted out to certain enterprises that the company considered to be too costly to manage themselves. they were established in such enterprises as transportation, fur trading and buffalo trading, with the company determining the price of transportation contracts and the only market for the individual traders. what emerged through this colonial economy was the foreign exploitation of both a national petty bourgeoisie, small working class and a large peasantry. it was the petty bourgeoisie and working class that eventually came to see that their national oppression resulted from class exploitation by foreign elements. in the 1840's the metis petty bourgeoisie engaged in political and economic struggle against the monopoly of the fur trade. their ultimate class intent was to displace the hudson's bay company and to become, themselves, the bourgeois merchant capitalists. in 1849, an armed insurrection occurred against the company's colonial rule. the response of the british was co-optive reprisals. concessions were made but, at the same time, british troops were brought in to maintain law and order. what looked on the surface to be concessions actually amounted to nothing more than a deflection of the metis class interests. regardless of how the eritish responded, they still perceived it as a thrust against their class interests. although this class confrontation was put down, it was an ongoing struggle against british colonialism and imperialism that again emerged in 1869-70. 134 a parallel situation for petty bourgeois native women emerged in 1850 following the anti-colonial outbreak of 1849. it had to do with the social status and relations of petty bourgeois ffelf-breed women within the then colonialism of the fur trade. a particular half-breed woman who was the daughter of a british officer and a half-breed woman, and who was the wife of the governor of assiniboia, became involved in a scandal. she was reputed to have had an affair with an officer of the british occupation forces. as she was a part of the colonial elite of native women in the red river, her reputed actions elicited a reaction from the resident european ruling class. her alleged immorality ultimately resulted in assiniboia becoming racially/nationally divided between the european ruling elites and the native population. european women at that time were slowly displacing half-breed women within the elite enclaves of colonial red river society. the actions of the wife of the governor of assiniboia were seen as unbecoming to a woman of such class position. regardless of whether or not it occurred, the political reality was that native elite women were excluded from access to ruling circles through dependent relationships with european men in much the same manner as the half-breed commercial petty bourgeoisie was prevented from having access to bourgeois capital. the ruling european class of the red river was becoming a part of the new colonialism and imperialism of the british empire and half-breed women were no longer seen as being of any 'value' as companions. as industrial capital continued to displace merchant capital within the world system, the british ruling elites in red river, although still administers of merchant capital in the fur trade, had their profits from the trade invested in railroad and bank shares in britain. their allegiances were with the new rising industrial order and, accordingly, 135 alliances with european women were seen as being more appropriate to their class interests. the anti-colonial struggle again emerged in 1869-70 under the leadership of riel. in spite of what has been written by bourgeois historians concerning the events of 1869-70, riel's main task was to establish bourgeois responsible government and to lead the people from under the historic yoke of colonial rule. his strategy was to gain access to capital through the establishment of a native liberal democratic state and a negotiated political relationship with the rest of canada. his belief was that the oppression of the native population was the result of the colonial exploitation by mercantile capitalism. by acquiring access to capital on their own, the l^etis could, he thought, establish new relations of production that would liberate the people from colonial oppression. this strategy was undermined and smashed by both london and ottawa. vnat this meant to native women was that whatever dependency relationships were established throughout exploitation by merchant capital, colonial relations and class formations were perpetuated within the developing canadian nation-state. in the north, london 'strategy was that the fur trade would continue under ever more backward and exploitative merchant capital. the relationship of indian women to the means of production, also ever more backward, was perpetuated in an ever more exploitative manner. with very few internal changes, conditions remained the same until after the second world war. it is then that profound changes started to occur. conclusion with the conquering of communal egalitarian society came the 126 destruction of indian women's egalitarian and mutual relationship with men. in its place was created a class society and the individual family as the basic unit of production within that society. as indian vomen were transformed into what i suggest is an exploited peasantry, the family unit became the basis of their exploitation. the labour of indian women, no longer existing in mutuality with men, became exploitable as support work either in relationship with indian men or with european men. the colonial relations that were imposed upon indian women placed them in a position of being sexually exploited by european men. this sexual exploitation occurred with women being used by the europeans to first conquer and then to develop trade relations with the indian population. early in the fur trade, indian women were used as created class and racial differences within the indian population, but in particular, within the population of indian women as they were forced to develop dependent relationships with european men. as a source of labour, indian women were more or less always exploited as support labour. as merchant capital became more 'backward' in relation to the development of industrial capital, the units of production and relations of production in which they then found themselves also become more backward and heavily exploited. with the influx of imperialism and the development of the market place after the second world war, the relations of production (instituted during the fur trade) broke down. the historic colonial agents were correspondingly usurped by the canadian state, the new agent of imperialism. in the north today, the struggles are many. an anti-colonial struggle continues but is now directed against the canadian state. at 127 the basis of all the struggles of class oppression and exploitation is the need of both women and men for jobs. but because of imperialism, the focus on capital intensive projects, resource extraction and the growing presence of the marketplace, the population is being throve into a labour market that cannot be dealt with. 'back to the land' projects and mentality cannot overcome these problems, as the labour power of the northern native is now in need of wage labour. in the most general of solutions there must be developed a relationship between the native and the greater white working class. it is in this relationship, with the working class echoing the struggles of the native, that the solutions through struggle will emerge. in the same sense native women and white women must come together and work out a strategy, a class struggle strategy that comes to terms with the roots and commonality of their oppression. to focus only on the reform of the indian act is, obviously, to focus only on the tip of the iceberg. notes [1] in the case of the plantation economies of the caribbean it was necessary that the indian population, since they were not willing to succumb to slavery, be exterminated in order that the slave mode of production could be established. [2] see also my soon to be published paper (fall of 1983?) in studies in fblitical economy, entitled "the indians, metis and the fur trade; class, colonialism and sexism in the transition from communism to capitalism." [31 although this was written one hundred years after the conquest, the exercising of autonomy over birth control by women still existed. this was partly because the indians were still responsible for their own social reproduction of labour and maintained some internal autonomous, i.e. egalitarian, relations. it is not until much later, (i.e. one hundred years) that indian individual family formations as units of production came under greater control, by 133 capital through christianization that attempts would have been made to do away with the autonomy of women over abortion. [4] although the relation between indian and trader was an instance of the penetration of capitalism, there ware certain similarities to the feudal mode of production: the psychological aspect of colonial dependency and of being passive to exploitation at every turn. certain gratis services were offered at the posts (eg. brandy) that served to enforce the developing servitude and, in return, indians ware expected to undertake certain donated duties and support work in recognition and acceptance of the 'new order of things.' this free labour also functioned as a form of tithe in recognition of the new owners of the land. [5] the production of surplus food from the buffalo had to be effective and complete. the plains indians ware still primitive-communist and more or less independent and, as such, would not produce the surplus required as a source of labour. it would have been necessary that they be conquered in a manner beyond economic domination, i.e. military. at that time, this was not feasible. instead, an alternate source of labour was introduced. it was necessary that the disciplined labour that was needed come from within capitalism and so it did, with the metis buffalo hunters. references engels, frederick 1975 the origin of the family, private property and the state. new york: international publishers. godelier, maurice 1978 "infrastructures, societies, and history," new left review no. 112. hudson's bay company archives, public archives of canada, ottawa section a 11 london correspondence inward from posts. section b post records 42. churchill or prince of v&les 135. moose 239. york section e 2. miscellaneous records. observations of hudson's bay. laclau, ernesto 1971 "feudalism and capitalism in latin america," new left review, no. 67. leacock, eleanor 1975 introduction to the origin of the family, private property and the state , by frederick engels. new york: international publishers. 1981 myths of male dominance . new york: monthly review press. 139 ••e rx , karl .311a capital , vol. 1. (moscow: progress publishers. 1977b capital , vol. 3. nbscow: progress publishers. 'eillassoux, claude 1972 "from reproduction to production," economy and society, vol. 1, no. 4. ?>eed , evelyn 1975 women's revolution. new york: pathfinder press. williams, glyndwr (ed.) 1969 andres grahams observations on hudson's bay, 1767-91. london: the hudson's eay record society. 140 296 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times book review economic democracy: the working class alternative to capitalism, by allan engler, halifax: fernwood publishing, 2010. $15.95 cad paper. isbn 9781552663462. pages 1-112. reviewed by: chris hurl1 in this world of highly specialized academic discourse, the art of writing a manifesto has all but disappeared. a good manifesto should be short, concise and all-encompassing. through sharp language it should cut to the core. in this sense, allan engler’s short book, economic democracy, should be seen as a contribution to the revival of the manifesto in confronting neoliberalism in canada and around the world. as a long-time activist in the labour movement, heading up local 400 of the international longshore and warehouse union (ilwu) and contributing to a strong left current in the vancouver and district labour council (vdlc), engler approaches the problems of modern capitalism as an organic intellectual. building on his earlier work, in which he examines the myth of market individualism, he diagnoses in clear language the many deep-seated problems inherent under capitalism and attempts to prescribe a solution, based on grassroots economic democracy. inspired by marx, engler situates modern capitalism in the disjuncture between the narrow restriction of property rights and the growing socialization of labour. on the one hand, ownership under capitalism is concentrated into the hands of an “entitled minority”. while this is often obfuscated through the apparent freedom of individuals to buy and sell things on the market, engler argues that market freedom is just another word for “letting the capitalists decide” (18). engler traces the implications of minority entitlement over the past three hundred years, which has entailed the destabilization of the world market, the destruction of the environment, the rise of colonial wars and the exploitation of peripheral regions by the core countries. on the other hand, people are increasingly interdependent, tied together in a complex division of labour. less and less capable of existing 1  chris hurl is a ph.d. candidate at the department of sociology and anthropology, carleton university (ottawa, canada). book review: economic democracy | 297 outside of market relations, they become dependent on social cooperation in order to survive. with the growing socialization of labour, the myth of competitive individualism becomes open to contestation as, increasingly, working people come to recognize that productivity cannot be simply attributed to the entrepreneurial spirit of individual capitalists, but is the outcome of complex relationships advanced between workers, communities, and nature. while engler goes some distance in diagnosing the problems of modern capitalism, he does not quite meet his mark. the key to writing a good manifesto is not only exposing the dark and dismal reality, but also evoking the collective protagonist that promises a way out, cobbling together a shared sensibility that transcends the relationship between author and reader. a good manifesto stands between voluntarism and determinism, such that the transformation envisioned is neither the result of the inevitable march of progress, nor is it simply a matter of waking people up out of false consciousness. on the one hand, the book falls short to the extent that it falls back on deterministic arguments. just like the transition from feudalism to capitalism, engler argues, the movement to a post-capitalist world will be a gradual one. it will not be produced through a revolutionary dictatorship or armed uprising. no single event will bring it about. in fact, the change will be incremental through the advancement of workplace organization, community mobilization and democratic political action. through slowly extending the power of social ownership, the powers of the “entitled minority” will be necessarily weakened. eventually, a “tipping point” will be reached and the system will be transformed as a whole. but how will the power of “social ownership” be advanced? at times this reads as an inevitable process. from the emergence of the early industrial unions through to the development of social security and the advancement of the rights of women and people of colour, engler’s account of twentieth century history appears as a ceaseless movement forward fuelled by the growing socialization of labour. however, barring a few comments on the deregulation of capital flows, he fails to sufficiently explain the significant shift in ruling relations over the last forty years. the rise of neoliberalism is simply attributed to the failure of trade union leaders and single-issue social activists to challenge the system as a whole. it is attributed to the lack of faith by the working class that a viable alternative to capitalism exists. missing from engler’s analysis is an in-depth discussion of “socialized labour,” which he defines as “people who depend on income from 298 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times their labour” (45). the rise of socialized labour is in part attributed to a process of primitive accumulation, by which people are dispossessed of their land and are compelled to sell their labour for a wage. it is fuelled by a process of technological innovation, through which people are integrated into an increasingly complex social machine. however, the notion of socialized labour is limited. to the extent that it includes everyone, this category lacks analytical power. it does not provide an adequate means of understanding the divisions in progressive social movements or the problem of building solidarity in the broader community. on the other hand, engler poses the solution as a matter of proper consciousness. it is simply a matter of showing people that a world of human equality, democracy and cooperation is practical and attainable. “once the scaffoldings of capitalist property relations have been removed, people will understand that well-being everywhere depends on human equality” (62). unfortunately, engler does not convincingly show how such a world is possible. instead, he falls back on the evocation of the hypothetical situation, that moment when revolution has been achieved, minority entitlement has been abolished and the community finally sits down to make its own decisions. the problem is that engler does not explain who or what this “community” is. this can, in part, be attributed to his latent populism. he tends to target forces external to the community that are responsible for its downfall. the “working class alternative” is purely negative, in the sense that it is simply contingent on denying minority entitlement. however, there is no sense of how this is a positive program. aside from a few hints of union organizing and social activism, there is no discussion of existing movements that are taking concrete steps towards a better world. in the absence of such a discussion, the advancement of alternatives is inevitably abstract and schematic. at times, engler appears as a makeshift fortune-teller, promising an end to war, environmental degradation and social inequality, viewing this more as a natural outcome than as a process that must be actively pursued through the adoption of specific strategies and tactics over the course of struggle. “socialized labour” and “community” are the two black-boxes that engler leaves unexplained. however, the book does take us in the direction of rethinking these terms and their relationship in practice. certainly, the rise of neoliberalism over the past forty years reflects the advancement of a fractured landscape upon which citizenship and wage labour have been unevenly inscribed. in this context, how can we effectively struggle to reconstitute the relationship between “work” book review: economic democracy | 299 and “citizenship” in a manner that undermines the market individualism that has been so prevalent over the past forty years? for instance, how does this play out on the ground through the struggles of public sector workers to retain their collective bargaining freedoms? or in the struggles of illegal immigrants to obtain the right to residence, gaining access to public schools and hospitals? in appraising the prefigurative possibilities of such struggles, it is not enough to simply invoke the universal protagonist that promises a way out. rather, it is important to recognize how these struggles come to develop concrete relationships with a broader community in practice. 87 cutting government deficits: economic science or class war? hugo radice1 abstract: the financial crisis of 2008 was widely blamed on reckless and predatory behavior by the banks, and public debate therefore centred on supporting employment and reforming the financial system. but during 2010, the focus of attention has shifted to the deficits and debts of governments, which are widely believed to be excessive and unsustainable. it is argued here that cutting government deficits is not an economic necessity, but a strategy for justifying attacks on the living standards of workers and heading off reforms that might threaten the power of the dominant business and financial elites. keywords: public finances; keynesianism; neoliberalism; class rule introduction shortly before the british general election of 6 may 2010 an independent london economic policy think-tank, the institute for fiscal studies (ifs), called for the major parties to ‘come clean’ about their strategies for reducing the public sector debt, if elected to office (chote 2010). the ifs report resonated strongly with the overall public attitude towards the main political parties in the campaign: fuelled by the parliamentary expenses scandal that dominated british politics for much of 2009, many people had come to regard all politicians as devious and untrustworthy. the media response pandered to this attitude by unthinkingly echoing the ifs position. the centre-left guardian asserted that the ifs was “the leading economics think-tank” in the country, clearly implying that its views must be accepted without question. in this particular case that meant accepting not only that 1 life fellow, school of politics and international studies, university of leeds, leeds, u.k.; correspondence to h.k.radice@ leeds.ac.uk. this paper develops arguments originally presented in an article published in the bullet on 4 may 2010: see http://www.socialistproject.ca/bullet/350.php. cutting government deficits: economic science or class war? 88 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research the political parties had to be transparent, but also that the public sector debt had to be reduced. to any critical social scientist, such claims require substantiation. leaving aside the less contentious first claim, that political parties should be open about their intentions, the purpose of this paper is to examine the second claim. is cutting the public debt really an objective economic necessity, or is it actually a deeply political stance, reflecting the interests of business and financial élites? in the next section, i look at the historical reconfiguration of public finances over the last forty years, focusing on the shift during that period from post-war keynesian state interventionism to the neoliberal hegemony that characterizes the current economic policy landscape across the world. the following section then examines the contemporary debates over public sector deficits and sovereign debt, arguing that because of the global savings glut that has persisted right through the crisis that began in 2007, it is not ‘economically necessary’ to give immediate priority to cutting public deficits and debts. in the final section, i suggest that the real reason for the cuts is twofold. on the one hand, the business, financial and political élites—in short, the ruling classes— were obliged in 2008 to summon the interventionist state back onto the stage to avoid a total collapse of global finance, and now want to banish it once more to a merely supportive role. on the other hand, the cuts in state spending and increases in taxes are being structured in such a way as to transfer income and wealth from working people to the rich and powerful: ironically, this has now been authoritatively confirmed in a detailed study by the self-same ifs (browne, 2010). this combined attack, at once economic, political and ideological, requires a response that breaks decisively both with the easy compromises of social democracy, as well as with the unpalatable elitism of vanguard communism. the political economy of state spending in historical perspective over the last forty years, the theory and practice of economic policy has shifted markedly from mainstream post-war keynesianism to the unchallenged hegemony of free-market neoliberalism. although there have been many elements in this overall shift—notably privatization of state enterprises, deregulation of financial markets, the globalization of finance and attacks on trade union rights—public finances have consistently played a central role. continuing a long historical tradition, britain was a pioneer in this shift to neoliberalism. there were two key campaigns in particular that affected the uk: the first during the ‘stagflation’ crisis of the mid-1970s, and the second during the sharp recession of the early 1990s. 89 the 1970s and the rise of thatcherism through the 1950s and 1960s, economic growth in britain had been slower than in continental europe, let alone japan. in the 1970s, slow growth came to be accompanied by both high inflation and the return of mass unemployment, a combination that was completely at odds with conventional keynesian thinking at the time. a long decline of industrial employment in britain also accelerated in the 1970s. this ‘deindustrialization’ was blamed variously on poor business management, a national culture hostile to scientific and technical education, the continuing cost of empire, excessive investment abroad, or the obstructiveness of highlyorganized trade unions. attempts by successive governments to address these problems of decline started under the 1964-70 wilson administrations, and continued through the heath years to the return of labour in 1974. in the decade from 1964, restricting public spending might have been necessitated when sterling was under pressure, but it was not seen as the key to macroeconomic stability. instead, the predominantly keynesian policy mainstream favoured state initiatives in the form of income policies and indicative planning, aiming to reconcile the conflicting interests of employers and unions through the good offices of the state. however, by 1976 these efforts appeared to have failed, as inflation reached a record level of 26% even though unemployment remained stubbornly high—an unprecedented combination that came to be called ‘stagflation’. although keynesians tried to argue that the inflation was largely the result of international developments such as the breakdown of the dollar-gold link in 1971 and the oil shock of 1973, their policies were clearly in disarray. this led to the emergence of two policy platforms standing to left and right of the mainstream. on the left, labour and the unions flirted with an alternative economic strategy which centred on a radical extension of state intervention in the modernization of british industry (london cse group, 1980). on the right, the monetarist followers of milton friedman offered an equally radical diagnosis, blaming stagflation on the fiscal and monetary indiscipline of the government (laidler, 1982). while friedman’s followers argued that inflation was always due to excessive expansion of the money supply by the central bank, in britain bacon and eltis (1980) argued that alongside this, successive governments had ‘crowded out’ private economic activity through the excessive growth of the public sector. following a sudden dip in britain’s trade balance in 1976, a run on the pound forced chancellor healey to turn to the international monetary fund (imf) for help. the public spending cuts that followed signalled an early victory for the monetarist right, and the end of the road for both mainstream keynesianism and the leftist alternative economic strategy. thatcher’s election success in 1979, followed cutting government deficits: economic science or class war? 90 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research by reagan’s in the usa, signalled the return of pre-keynesian economic and social conservatism. in britain, the fierce monetary and fiscal squeeze that ensued put manufacturing to the sword, while the abolition of exchange controls allowed the burgeoning wealth from north sea oil to be invested largely abroad. trade union rights were severely restricted through a series of legislative measures. the breaking of the print unions by rupert murdoch and the defeat of the year-long miners’ strike of 1984-5 signalled an end to the power of organized labour. the second half of the 1980s saw an eventual revival in economic growth, which was widely seen as a triumph for thatcherism (coates and hillard, 1987). politically, that triumph was very well summed up by gamble (1988) as combining the free economy and the strong state: in order to liberate capital from the suffocating embrace of the state, it was necessary for the state itself to act decisively to restrict its own sphere of action. internationally there were soon clear parallels to the rise of thatcherism in britain. the bretton woods international monetary order, set up in 1944 and broadly inspired by keynes, had tied most currencies to the us dollar, which in turn had been tied to gold. the availability of temporary loans from the imf in principle gave governments the leeway to work out their own solutions to deficits in their balance of payments. this system had been abandoned in 1971-2, when the us no longer had the gold reserves to support it, and thereafter currencies were mostly allowed to float, meaning that their values were determined by international market forces. the revival of private international finance accelerated as a result of the massive 1973 rise in oil prices, when oil producers’ revenues were recycled as loans to oil-consuming countries. in 1979, president carter’s federal reserve chairman paul volcker attacked us inflation through a dramatic monetary squeeze, raising interest rates sharply and plunging the us into recession. this not only signalled a shift to monetarist economic policies in the us, but also directly contributed to the third world debt crisis of the 1980s. hit by falling export revenues and a rising cost of debt service from higher interest rates, many developing countries were forced to seek help from the imf and the world bank precisely when those bodies were themselves adopting the revived economic ideology of free markets and sound money. loans were only made available on condition of cuts in public spending and the liberalization of trade and finance, the new development policy that became known as the washington consensus (williamson, 1993). the triumph of neoliberalism – and globalization while the third world was devastated by the debt crisis of the 1980s (haggard & kaufman, 1992), the uk and us financial sectors pressed forward with deregulation at home and expansion abroad, laying the basis for their joint domination of global financial markets. however, by the end of the decade, the us 91 recovery under the reagan administrations ended in a major financial crisis centred on the savings and loan companies that traditionally provided residential mortgage loans. recovery in the uk centred on financial services, retail and property, generating a boom that led to renewed inflation and an unsustainable expansion of credit. meanwhile in japan too, a frenetic stock market and property boom led to a spectacular crash in 1987. when these developments culminated in a global financial bust in 1990-91, coinciding with the fall of communist regimes across the soviet bloc, the freemarket right once again blamed lax monetary policy and excessive public spending. within the european union, this resulted in the strictures of the maastricht treaty, first negotiated in 1991 and finally enacted, after some resistance, in 1993. in relation to public finance, from now on all eu member states were enjoined to limit their fiscal deficits to 3% of gdp, and their aggregate public debts to 60% of gdp. the free-market reforms that the washington consensus had imposed on the third world were now also imposed upon the post-communist ‘transition’ countries of eastern europe and the former soviet union. as a result, economic policy regimes across the world began rapidly converging on a single model, that of neoliberalism. within each country, this took the form of monetary and fiscal policies that prioritized open markets and low inflation, rather than full employment or the eradication of poverty. in the monetary field, the overriding purpose was to achieve a target rate of inflation. because banking and finance were both deregulated and internationally integrated, the money supply became almost impossible to measure, let alone control, and selective state intervention in credit markets was now ruled out. as a result, the rate of interest became the key policy instrument; if inflation exceeded its target, the central bank would raise the rate of interest charged to banks, and if it fell below, they would reduce it. meanwhile, the limits on public expenditure and government deficits not only brought to a halt the expansion of welfare states, but also accelerated the privatization of state-owned industries everywhere, most extensively in the excommunist countries. the wider political economy of neoliberalism centred on two significant processes through the 1990s. the first of these was financialization (epstein, 2005), in which capital accumulation shifts to the financial services sector from the production of other goods and services. while financial firms certainly took full advantage of the sector’s deregulation, the growth in financial markets and the development of new financial products was enthusiastically welcomed by businesses and households alike. for big business in particular, the 1990s saw a boom in mergers, buy-outs and restructuring, and the embedding of financial imperatives within the firm aimed at maximizing profits. this signalled an abrupt end to the more benign ‘managerial cutting government deficits: economic science or class war? 92 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research revolution’ of the post-war period, in which professional management and organized labour supposedly worked together in pursuit of growth, innovation and good working conditions. households, suffering from stagnation in earnings as a result of fierce competition in labour markets, began to pile up debt as they sought to maintain the growth in living standards to which they had become accustomed. unwittingly, they were being transformed from wage-earning workers into universal financial subjects, viewing the world in terms of investment opportunities and capital gains (radice, 2010b). the second important process of change was globalization, which became a dominant subject of study across the social sciences and in political and cultural discourse. after two decades of relative stagnation, the 1990s saw dramatic growth in trade and foreign direct investment (fdi) across all sectors of the economy and in all parts of the world. within the washington consensus, fdi was to replace publicly-funded aid programmes as the primary means of modernization and development, enabling ‘emerging economies’ to take advantage of trade liberalization by expanding their exports to the consumer markets of the rich countries. fdi was also central to the remarkable acceleration of economic growth in asia, especially the rise of china, and in latin america. by the end of the decade, the conventional perception on the left of a third world entirely and inevitably mired in poverty and stagnation had become seriously out of date. these twin processes strongly reinforced the transformation in economic policy regimes everywhere. globalization and financialization ensured that the state’s fiscal and monetary discipline was backed up by the mighty power of global credit markets. the capacity to withdraw funds from states backsliding on their commitment to neoliberalism was exemplified in the dramatic crises that hit mexico in 1994, many east asian countries in 1997, and russia in 1998. with active monetary and fiscal policies to pursue national economic goals now outlawed, the standard policy model became that of the ‘competition state’ (cerny 1997), seeking to attract inward investment flows to boost employment and exports, and to provide the ‘supply-side’ infrastructure for domestic businesses. although the turn of the millennium was accompanied by further outbreaks of financial crisis—for instance, the ‘dot.com’ stock-market bust and argentina in 2001—a new wave of global economic growth accompanied by low inflation appeared to justify the self-satisfied claim that ‘the ‘great moderation’ had arrived (bernanke, 2004). until 2007, the hegemony of neoliberalism seemed assured. the course of the crisis: government deficits and the bond markets the origins and course of the crisis that began in that year have by now generated a large literature (for a fuller account see radice, 2010b). the combination 93 of a long period of growth with exceptionally low interest rates had led to the over-selling of ‘sub-prime’ mortgages to poorer households in the usa, who were persuaded that ever-increasing house prices could provide economic security. like other forms of household loan, these mortgages were funded through securitization, issuing bonds whose value was based on the stream of expected mortgage payments. for the purchasers of such bonds, the risk appeared minimal, since each was based on a diversified bundle of mortgages, so that if some were to go into default, the rest would carry on generating income. in any case, the risk could also be laid off through a new form of insurance eagerly supplied by global investors—the credit default swap. through 2005-7, mortgage defaults climbed as interest rates rose, while both house prices and employment stalled, and it slowly became clear that the risk to the value of mortgage-backed securities had been drastically underestimated. as defaults increased, thousands of banks, insurance companies and other investors such as hedge funds found themselves facing potentially catastrophic losses. with the markets unable to arrive at any clear idea of the real value of trillions of dollars worth of financial assets, day-to-day lending transactions between banks ground to a halt, not just in the usa but around the world. during 2008, the entire global financial sector slid inexorably towards total breakdown. after the bankruptcy of lehman brothers in september 2008, governments began a hectic programme of concerted actions. these were aimed first at supporting the banks so that they could continue to manage the world’s monetary flows, and then, as a world recession rapidly set in, at sustaining aggregate demand. interest rates fell to near-zero and central banks pumped money into their economies. for the worst-hit countries, the imf organised rescues using the methods established in the 1980s third world debt crisis. the traditional g8 summits were hastily supplemented by larger g20 meetings, bringing china, india and brazil among others into the mix. global governance agencies, such as the bank for international settlements and the organization for economic cooperation and development, provided coordination and advice, and began the process of crafting regulatory reforms for the banking sector aimed at avoiding any repetition of the crisis. despite the obvious echoes of the global crisis of the 1930s, however, there has been no repetition, at least in the major capitalist nations, of the catastrophic rises in unemployment and falls in international trade that characterized that decade. this is surely partly due to the dense web of global governance institutions, which scarcely existed eighty years ago. the cooperative response has also reflected the dramatically greater extent of cross-border economic interdependence. however, the proximate reason is undoubtedly the adoption of massive fiscal stimulus packages, most notably in the usa and in china, but also in many other countries. the fiscal stringency of the maastricht treaty and the washington consensus was cutting government deficits: economic science or class war? 94 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research quickly abandoned from late 2008, with current budget deficits rising rapidly to levels ranging from 5% to 15% of gdp or more. however, through the second half of 2009 the tide of support for public intervention began to turn. precisely because the giant investment banks make their money from market-making and transactions, rather than loans and investments, their fortunes quickly recovered from the 2008 debacle, the supreme irony being the vast commissions they got for marketing the flood of new sovereign borrowing, and restructuring and refinancing busted large corporations like general motors. as credit markets began to function again, even the derided ratings agencies like moody’s, which had happily taken fat fees for doling out aaa ratings on sub-prime mortgage-backed securities, recovered their nerve and began to pronounce upon the sustainability of the much higher—and still rising—post-crisis levels of government debt. as the eurozone powers bickered over how to address greece’s fiscal crisis in late 2009, governments recently freed from the shackles of fiscal restraint found themselves once more on the defensive. how and why has this happened? it is striking that at no point in the past forty years of debate on public finances did the monetarist economists—or their neoliberal successors—explain why any particular limit to public deficits and debt was economically necessary. instead we have been offered, then as now, an entirely circular argument. we are told by supposed economic experts that deficit cuts are necessary because international bond markets require them. so why do the investors in international bond markets require cuts? because the economic experts say they are necessary! now it is certainly the case that any single government which accumulates debts that are very high compared to those of other governments will find itself subject to special scrutiny by the bond markets, as the greeks now know only too well, and as many third world governments found out already back in the 1980s. we should of course also make allowance for the pernicious effects of speculators: for instance, the role of george soros in britain’s 1992 crisis that forced it out of the european union’s exchange rate mechanism, or the flight of ‘hot money’ from east asia in 1997. but a reasonable case can still be made that governments should, in normal times, avoid excessive reliance on borrowing, especially to fund current expenditure as opposed to capital investments. however, from the standpoint of macroeconomic stability, and especially that of maintaining full or near-full employment, our overriding concern today should remain that of keynes: the need for governments to sustain economic activity at a time when savings in the private sector greatly exceed investments. this need is met by absorbing excess savings through the sale of government securities, the proceeds of which are then spent so as to sustain aggregate output and employment. 95 there are however big differences in the nature of capitalism today, compared to the 1930s when keynes first made the case for counter-cyclical public spending. in 1933, after the failure of yet another international conference aimed at coordinating responses to the crisis, keynes reluctantly made the case for a national solution led by the state. as a lifelong liberal, he rejected both the soviet experiment of central planning, and the emerging nazi model of extreme economic nationalism under the joint dictatorship of capital and the state. from then on, he consistently argued that international capital movements should be tightly restricted, so that governments could fully exercise the control over national financial markets that they acquired through the sheer scale of their borrowing and their control of the money supply (radice, 1988). but precisely as a result of the combined processes of deregulation, financialization and globalization discussed earlier, governments no longer have this degree of structural power over finance. in addition, for decades now, massive imbalances in international trade between countries have been sustained, with the huge trade surpluses of japan, germany, and now china being matched by the huge deficits of the usa and britain. these trade imbalances are by definition offset by capital flows from surplus to deficit countries, and these flows—as well as the financing of expanded trade—have been a major feature of financial globalization. as a result the keynesian premise, of the state’s structural power over finance, can only be fully applied collectively at the global level. state power over finance could only be re-established within a single country by a radical disengagement from the world economy, but given the economic and political resources invested in building the global economy and its neoliberal order, the cost of doing so would be immense. adopting this approach, we can see that the continued growth and prosperity of countries with chronic trade surpluses, like germany and china, depend, in conditions of global recession, on the willingness of other countries like the usa and britain to continue to run trade deficits. as a corollary—and this is really an economic fact—there will be continuing matching outflows of capital from the former countries, and inflows into the latter. given the current reluctance of businesses and households in the trade-deficit countries to borrow and spend, it is their government borrowing that keeps the world economy going. and the very fact that so many governments have been able to borrow so much since 2008 shows that, despite the global recession, there remains a global savings glut. this savings glut has arisen because of the massive shift from wages to profits, and from the closely-related subordination of hundreds of millions of peasants and independent producers to wage labour in those ‘emerging’ economies. as states have abandoned their earlier commitment to the fiscal mitigation of inequality, the wealthy have increased their grip on global savings. cutting government deficits: economic science or class war? 96 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research as long as those savings continue to exceed global private sector investments, governments must continue to absorb that excess. otherwise, the world economy will slip back into the famous ‘double-dip’ recession, a prospect that has become increasingly likely through the summer of 2010. indeed, as and when the global recovery has reached the point where private sector investment has substantially recovered and cyclical unemployment has disappeared, why should ‘the markets’ require a reduction of government deficits to ‘normal’ levels? there is, after all, no economic law that dictates a 3% cap on the government deficit, and 60% on debt, or indeed any other numerical values. the level of aggregate economic activity is entirely unaffected by the proportion of demand that flows through the public rather than the private sector. as real interest rates swing back to being moderately positive, the power of compound interest is surely enough to sustain the economic advantage of the rich, as well as the pensions of the middle classes. resolving the crisis: restoring class rule in the end, now as in the 1970s, the real reason for the attacks on state borrowing and state expenditure lies not in economics, but in politics, or more specifically in class warfare. for it is primarily through the politics of democracy—even our highly restricted form of it—that the privileged position of private wealth has historically come under threat. after 1945 the propertyless in most parts of the world, west, east and south, made remarkable gains in their well-being and in the strength of their political voice. by the mid-1970s, the propertied classes—whether capitalists, usurers, merchants or landlords, or indeed the soviet-bloc bureaucratic élite—found themselves on the defensive on many fronts. many radical nationalist governments in the third world continued to press for reforms in the governance of the world economy, challenging the new forms of economic colonialism that followed independence (biel, 2000, ch.6). in the soviet bloc, the 1968 prague spring and the first stirrings of the polish workers’ movement in 1970 threatened the bureaucrats’ highly centralised power (harman, 1974). and in the west, not only had new social movements challenged the elites on issues of gender, race and the environment, but workers were also advancing new claims to workplace democracy and economic security that seriously threatened the power of big business and high finance (e.g. rowbotham, segal and wainwright, 1979; gorz, 1985). the previous two sections charted the rise of neoliberalism with a particular focus on public finances. with the benefit of hindsight, the historical logic of that rise seems all too apparent. but the political articulation of an effective response by the ruling classes to the combined challenges of the 1970s was by no means clear at the time. for more than thirty years, the ideologues of neoliberalism, with econo97 mists at the fore, worked assiduously to construct a new common-sense about the economy based on the old liberal mantra: property rights, individualism and the residual state. yet they were constantly faced with resistance, not only from the diverse forces of the left, seeking to at least defend the post-war gains of workers, but also from political strands of the right: nationalism, religious authoritarianism, and even, in parts of the global south, the traditional paternalism that remained from the rule of precapitalist landed interests (barrington moore, 1966). karl polányi (1944) had argued that the nineteenth-century liberal utopia of a market society had historically foundered on the social consequences of subordinating not only produced commodities, but also land, labour and money, to the market—in marx’s terms, to the rule of capital. the result was a historical ‘double movement’: first towards the market society, and then towards social protection. by the turn of the millennium, the restructuring of the state, the redistribution of income and wealth to the rich, and the removal of workers’ collective rights had seemingly turned the tide once more towards the market society. yet in 2007-9, the crisis immediately led to widespread public challenges to the neoliberal order, and the ruling classes were obliged to tear up the neoliberal rulebook in favour of vigorous state intervention. perhaps this heralded the second phase of a new polányian double movement, as hettne (1997) had argued a decade earlier (for a sceptical view see wade, 2010). but as we have seen, within about six months the neoliberals regrouped. in britain, as the debate over labour’s 2009 budget already showed, their ownership of the economic common sense allowed them to steadily shift the focus of debate from exacting retribution and repayment from the banks, to blaming governments for assuming the vast fiscal deficits that have kept capitalism afloat. meanwhile, those who spoke up for real alternatives—for green new deals, for radical reform of the banks, for a new international financial architecture—have been pushed to the margins of public attention. the immediate need, at this juncture, is for the left to continue to make the case for maintaining public expenditure, supporting the efforts of keynesian economists such as paul krugman, robert reich and joseph stiglitz in the us, or david blanchflower and robert skidelsky in britain. across the eu, the progressive economists of the euromemorandum group (2009) have argued this case, and even the international monetary fund has argued that “growth prospects in advanced economies could suffer if an overly severe or poorly planned fiscal consolidation stifles still-weak domestic demand” (imf, 2010, p. 7). however, it is becoming increasingly clear that this is by no means enough, because it takes the easy course of looking back at how the world was before neoliberalism—and often doing so through rose-tinted glasses. james ferguson (2010) argues, in relation to the global south, that returning to the alternative of the decutting government deficits: economic science or class war? 98 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research velopmental state is not enough because the building-blocks of politics—workers, markets, nation-states—have been so fundamentally reconfigured by neoliberal restructuring. in the context of a realistic appreciation of these changes, we can see that the assault on public spending goes far beyond the simple matter of the macroeconomic management of effective demand. in this respect, britain is leading the way, as has so often been the case historically. following the election on 6 may 2010, a coalition government was unexpectedly formed between the conservative party under david cameron, which had won the largest number of seats but not an overall majority, and the much smaller liberal democrats under nick clegg, which had widely been assumed to favour a centre-left coalition with labour. on 22 june, the coalition announced an emergency budget, setting out savage cuts in public spending of up to 25% in all areas except health and overseas aid” (for details see radice, 2010a). however, as government ministers began to detail their substantive plans for the years ahead, it quickly became clear that the immediate macroeconomic consequences were only one issue for the government’s critics. in the key areas of health, education and welfare, the coalition intends a far more radical assault on the nature of the state and its relation to society. this assault is not only aimed at deepening the neoliberal restructuring of institutions, but also at banishing the very idea that societal goals can be advanced through the collective state provision of public goods. the message is relentlessly driven home, that the coalition wants to ‘restore power to the people’, linking service provision directly to clients and engaging the public actively in the substantive shaping of that provision. in historical terms, this is taking britain back not merely to the era before the post-1945 welfare state, but to before the liberal reforms of the early 20th cent ury. however, in every respect the coalition is cleverly building upon initiatives and perceptions already established not only by the tory administrations from 1979 to1997, but also under new labour from 1997 to 2010. new labour dropped the tory experiment under which family doctors commissioned specialist medical services; but in opting for an indirect commissioning model via local bureaucracies under central state control, they ensured that the nhs would still be driven by financial motives and managed along private-sector lines. in education, new labour persistently undermined democratic local control through central initiatives and through the creation of specialist academies at the secondary level. and in welfare, despite some successful initiatives aimed at tackling child poverty, they pursued ‘modernization’ and ‘value for money’ programmes that did nothing to break the weary cycles of poverty and welfare dependency in which so many millions were trapped. however, at a deeper level the neoliberal project is also about reshaping the very nature of citizenship, the way in which individuals imagine and live their relations with each other and with social institutions. in the post-war period, it was generally 99 taken for granted that these relations were shaped by institutions structured around class interests: trade unions, professional associations, and political parties whose ideologies reflected the interests of capital or labour. today, any such concept of class as a mediating force has been expunged from public discourse. on the left, the retreat from statism (social-democratic or communist) led in the 1990s to the famous ‘third way’ of giddens (1999), and the search for progressive elements in ‘civil society’ and ‘social movements’. on the right, the currently-fashionable british ‘red tory’ thinker philip blond (2010) argues that the modern citizen can be mindful of social needs and active in ensuring their provision, while still responding to market signals in the more narrowly economic sphere. the consequence is to deprive anyone seeking to pursue traditional progressive goals of equality, solidarity and sustainable livelihoods of the potential for a collective response to neoliberalism. so can the concept of class be resuscitated? in marx’s work in particular, class is a relational concept centred on the way in which society’s material reproduction is ensured. under capitalism, the predominant but by no means exclusive form of this is capitalist production, based on the separation of the majority from direct appropriation of the means of production. this separation divides society into workers and capitalists, with the many and varied strata of society comprehensible only in terms of their standing in relation to that fundamental division. neoliberalism has developed a double denial of the significance of class division in this sense, building upon the dominant theoretical traditions of mainstream sociology. first, class is redefined empirically in terms of the detailed differentiation of income levels and occupations in society, whose multiple groups are then aggregated into ‘working class’ and ‘middle class’. many marxists have been drawn into this position, accepting the divide between the two, and arguing only that elements of this middle class could still challenge the rule of capital, either in conjunction with or in place of the industrial working class (walker, 1979; for a general review of ‘new class’ theories see king & szelényi, 2004). but as long as the main axes of differentiation are rooted in the production of goods and services as commodities, the common subordination to the dynamics of capitalist accumulation ensures common experiences that potentially unite these supposedly separate ‘classes’, however elusive this unity may have become (meiksins, 1986). the second denial addresses this problem directly, by positing other systematic determinants of the relation between individual and society, firmly based outside the realm of production. this has also been a perennial feature of mainstream sociology, but in recent decades it has been fuelled by the universal rejection of most varieties of marxism for their ‘economic determinism’. twentieth-century marxism, from gramsci to poulantzas and on, had in many respects accepted the criticism, downcutting government deficits: economic science or class war? 100 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research playing the analysis of ‘economic’ production relations in favour of an approach in which ‘the political’ is constituted as ‘relatively autonomous’. but equally, since the 1970s much of the left has rejected ‘class politics’—interpreted narrowly as the sectional interests of the traditional male industrial working class—in favour of the ‘rainbow politics’ of social movements, rooted in the different, supposedly more authentic needs of particular social groups. it seems clear that the rejection of class politics goes hand in hand with the view that economic activity really is constituted separately from other aspects of life in capitalist societies, including politics. however, such a view is at the very core of liberalism as a political ideology. for if the economic is really separated from the political, then its regulation can and should lie outside the realm of political action. in other words, the institution of private property cannot be politically challenged, and property rights cannot be subordinated to human or civil rights in forms such as ‘the right to livelihood’. it is precisely in order to develop a substantive underpinning for this proposition that neoliberalism now seeks to redefine the individual in effect as a capitalist, an economic subject whose engagement with others is mediated by the market, and structured by the accumulation of private capital. since it is self-evident that the great majority of individuals are not ‘capitalists’ in marx’s sense—possessing a sufficient mass of money-capital that can generate at least a subsistence income— they are, instead, seen as capable of accumulating ‘human’ or ‘social’ capital (fine, 2010), the possession of which enables them in principle to acquire money capital. yet they can only do that through the sale of their labour-power—in other words, through wage labour, as members of the working class. in order to escape from the trap that neoliberalism is now springing the left needs to reassert the class nature of capitalism in these terms, albeit without in any sense denying the political significance of other forms of oppression. in a letter to marx, engels (1858) famously quipped that “the english proletariat is actually becoming more and more bourgeois, so that the ultimate aim of this most bourgeois of all nations would appear to be the possession, alongside the bourgeoisie, of a bourgeois aristocracy and a bourgeois proletariat”. the reality is that britain is the most proletarian of nations, in terms of the proportion of its population who rely on wage-labour for their subsistence: there are no peasants left, and small-business capitalism has always been feebler than in other capitalist countries. by recognizing such foundations in present-day economic reality, it may yet prove possible to build a movement of universal appeal that can challenge the class rule of capital. 101 references bacon, r. and eltis, w. (1980). britain’s economic problem: too few producers. london: macmillan. barrington moore, j. r. (1966). social origins of dictatorship and democracy: lord and peasant in the making of the modern world. boston: beacon press. bernanke, b. (2004). ‘the great moderation’. speech to the eastern economic association, 20 february 2004. see http://www.federalreserve.gov/boarddocs/speeches/2004/20040220/default. htm. biel, r. (2000). the new imperialism: crisis and contradictions in north/south relations. london: zed press. blond, p. (2010). red tory: how left and right have broken britain and how we can fix it. london: faber. browne, j. et al. (2010). ‘the distributional effects of tax and benefit reforms between june 2010 and april 2014: a revised assessment’. institute for fiscal studies briefing note bn108, 25 august, available at www.ifs.org.uk/publications/5246. cerny, p. (1997). ‘paradoxes of the competition state: the dynamics of political globalization’. government and opposition 32(1), 251-74. chote, r. et al. (2010). ‘filling the hole: how do the three main uk parties plan to repair the public finances?’. institute for fiscal studies 2010 election briefing note no.12, 27 april, available at www.ifs.org.uk/publications/4848. coates, d. and hillard, j. (eds) (1987). the economic revival of modern britain: the debate between left and right. aldershot: edward elgar. engels, f. (1858). letter to marx of 7 october 1858, in marx-engels collected works 40, 343. epstein, g. (ed) (2005). financialization and the world economy. cheltenham: edward elgar. euromemorandum group (2009). europe in crisis: a critique of the eu’s failure to respond. at http://www.lwbooks.co.uk/ebooks/euromemorandum%202009-2010.pdf. ferguson, j. (2010). ‘the uses of neoliberalism’. antipode 41(s1), 166-84. fine, b. (2010). theories of social capital: researchers behaving badly. london: pluto press. gamble, a. (1988). the free economy and the strong state: the politics of thatcherism. london: macmillan. giddens, a. (1999). the third way: the renewal of social democracy. cambridge: polity press. gorz, a. (1985). paths to paradise: on the liberation from work. boston: south end press. cutting government deficits: economic science or class war? 102 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research harman, c. (1974). bureaucracy and revolution in eastern europe. london: pluto press. haggard, s. and kaufman, r. (eds) (1992). the politics of economic adjustment. princeton: princeton up. hettne, b. (1997). ‘development, security and world order: a regionalist approach’. european journal of development research 9(1), 83-106. international monetary fund (2010). world economic outlook update. 7 july, at http://www.imf. org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2010/update/02/pdf/0710.pdf. king, l.p. and szelényi, i. (2004). theories of the new class: intellectuals and power. minneapolis: university of minnesota press. laidler, d. (1982). monetarist perspectives. oxford: philip allan. london cse group (1980). the alternative economic strategy: a response by the labour movement to the economic crisis. london: cse books. meiksins, p. (1986). ‘beyond the boundary question’. new left review 157, 101-20. polányi, k. (1944). the great transformation: the political and economic origins of our times. beacon hill: beacon press. radice, h. (1988). ‘keynes and the policy of practical protectionism’, in j. v. hillard (ed), j. m. keynes in retrospect. aldershot: edward elgar, 153-71. radice, h. (2010a). ‘britain’s austerity budget: a class act’, the bullet 385. at http://www.socialistproject.ca/bullet/385.php. radice, h. (2010b). ‘confronting the crisis: a class analysis’. socialist register 2011, forthcoming. rowbotham, s., segal, l. and wainwright, h. (1979). beyond the fragments: feminism and the making of socialism. london: merlin books. wade, r. (2010). ‘is the globalization consensus dead?’. antipode 41(s1), 142-65. walker, p. (ed.) (1979). between labour and capital. brighton: harvester press. williamson, j. (1993). ‘democracy and the “washington consensus”’. world development 21(8), 1329-36. 252 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism book review canada and israel: building apartheid by yves engler. winnipeg: fernwood publishing, 2010. $15.95 can. isbn: 978-1-55266-355-4. pages: 1-168. reviewed by natalie spagnuolo1 canada’s policy towards israel constitutes a minefield of contentious issues which historians of canadian foreign relations seldom directly address. among the accounts that are most visible, few diverge from the nationalist narrative that represents canada as historically favouring peace-keeping over militarism. this positive portrait of canada, as suggested by paul heinbecker and bessma momani’s, compliments a somewhat more critical stance that imagines canada’s role as a less consequential, neutral player in middle east affairs.2 in canada and israel: building apartheid, engler problematizes the claims of current analysts, such the former canadian ambassador to israel michael bell,3 who would like to see greater canadian involvement in the middle east. engler takes issue with the perception of canada’s suitability as an “honest-broker” in the israel-palestine conflict. he argues that a consistently pro-israel attitude has characterized canada’s foreign policy towards the conflict from the nineteenth century onwards. perhaps no other study makes as strong a claim as engler does for historical consistency in terms of canadian complicity in the zionist expansion of jewish settlements. building on the foundation of leftwing revisionist readings of zionism as a form of colonialism, engler implicates canada in the controversial expansion of the state of israel and the current apartheid conditions by considering the domestic and international events that have supported these developments. following a tradition that traces canadian interest in the region back to the anti-semitic christian political 1 natalie spagnuolo completed an ma in history at carleton university. 2 heinbecker, p. and b. momani (eds.). canada and the middle east: in theory and practice. waterloo: wilfred laurier university. 3 bell, m., m. malloy, d. sultan and s. shaker. practitioner’ perspectives on canada-middle east relations. in heinbecker, p. and b. momani (eds.). canada and the middle east: in theory and practice (pp.7-24). waterloo: wilfred laurier university. canada and israel | 253 culture of the nineteenth century, the first chapter of this book attempts to develop a historical trend by assuming continuity between disparate time periods. engler represents the general tone of entire decades with single statements that demonstrate a “fortuitous political climate” for the federation of zionist societies of canada (p.13). considering the scope of the study, these leaps are likely made to allow engler to address the present-day consequences of canada’s support for israeli expansionism. nevertheless, his less-than-precise treatment of zionism conflates various versions of the movement and misleadingly overlooks participation by canadians in anti-expansionist zionist organizations, such as the union of progressive zionists (upz). engler’s larger point is that historically, canadian society has facilitated israel’s expansion by conjuring its own justifications for sustaining nationalist aggression, and not by simply borrowing the arguments of political zionists. through salient case studies, he highlights some of the advantages that canada has gained throughout various stages of its support for israeli expansionism, including such economic benefits as might result from the sale of weapons by canadian manufacturers to israeli buyers (p.10). a more thorough exposition of this thesis occurs in chapters 2, 3 and 4, which focus on the ways in which canadian policy has been influenced by broader international relations and a tendency to remain “preoccupied with the great powers,” namely britain and america (p.24). however, engler derives this trend from a reading of various media sources without comparing coverage of events, and this, along with his reliance on secondary sources that are often considered polemical, detracts from the credibility of this section. his humanitarian convictions and his motivation to mould his argument along these lines leads to a somewhat univocal interpretation of events. by not considering the subjectivity of his own accounts, engler consistently eschews the academic integrity necessary to persuade opponents of this perspective. these early chapters are balanced with a final section that is derived from a leftist, politically-conscious reading of present-day canada. more convincingly, chapters 5 and 6 document how canada’s supportive attitude for israel has been consistent with the activities of intelligence agencies, lobby groups, and major canadian corporations and charities. engler exposes aspects of canadian society that function to directly support israel’s expansion but which are, interestingly enough, unknown to most canadians, supporting the idea that “israel is highly dependent on north american financial, military, ideological and diplomatic support” 254 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism (p.145). key to engler’s claim is the connection he draws between the charitable status granted to israeli expansionist organizations in canada, such as the jewish national fund, and the support for canadian industries active in palestinian territory that falls beyond the green line. engler suggests the anti-semitic nature of explanations exaggerate the role of canada’s jewish communities. carefully distinguishing between anti-semitism and anti-zionism in chapter 9, he highlights the extensive efforts of anti-zionist jewish organizations and warns against the use of anti-semitism to discourage anti-zionist values (p.146). canadian complicity in israel is, according to engler, the outcome of a discourse that has developed while most canadians have been “shut-out of the discussion” (p.147). this political commentary is supplemented with engler’s own experience as a political activist. his skill in researching economic connections to foreign policy (see his black book of canadian foreign policy) lends this book greater weight as a counter-narrative, despite his failure to follow academic conventions. throughout canada and israel, engler insists that the relevancy of the current conflict in palestine and the suffering of palestinians must be defended based on canada’s role in that conflict and “canadian complicity with that suffering” (p.142). according to engler, failure to adequately defend the prioritization of this issue to canadians will not only sideline the problem but will risk insinuating anti-semitism (p.142). ingraining his argument in the thick fabric of controversy, engler’s book is a welcome contribution to the sparsely populated field of critical studies of canadian-israeli relations. the struggle for equal pay for work of equal value: a case study stella lord introduction the concept of equal pay for women has not been tied to the concept of 'value' in most provincial equal pay legislation in canada. the pay of men in similar jobs in the same establishment has, in most cases, been the criterion for equal pay legislation. consequently, if women work in sex segregated jobs, or job 'ghettos', they remain outside the present legislation in most canadian provinces. possibly as a natural effect of the women's liberation movement on the one hand and frustration with the slow progress towards effective equal pay legislation on the other, women are now tending to turn to 2 unionization and union militancy to achieve higher rates of pay. except in one or two isolated instances, however, there have been few explicit demands based on the concept of equal pay for work of equal value. moreover, there is little uniformity in the extent to which the process of unionization itself is successful, or the economic benefits to be gained from it jre realized. unionization amongst nurses has been relatively successful on both counts, whereas unionization amongst bank tellers has been slow, spasmodic and localized , and unions have been unable to make real economic gains. the strike of the communication workers (bell canada) succeeded in making economic gains, whereas workers at radio shack, fleck and blue cross in ontario underwent long strikes merely to gain union recognition and the right to bargain. even where women are unionized, therefore, higher rates of pay (to say nothing of general overall parity with male workers) are not achieved without a struggle. unions, even the most militant and well organized, must face not only the economic power of their employers, but an ideologically structured industrial relations system which is also weighted against radical change in bargaining patterns. union militancy around the issue ot higher wages for women is certainly a step in the right direction. but while it provides a vehicle and a tool for the attainment of equal pay, unless demands are tied to the concept of value there are limitations on what it can do for women working in highly sex segregated jobs and for those with little or no collective bargaining strength. union militancy, therefore, is not a panacea. if the concept of equal pay for work of equal value were to become an accepted criterion on which pay rates were to be negotiated, however, it could have wide ranging effects on the status of women in our society, both inside and outside the labour movement. there is also the possibility that it could raise broader, more fundamental, questions about the 'value' of labour. for the concept of 'value' as a measurement for wage rates introduces a criterion which raises a number of questions about the labour market, the collective bargaining system and the 22 structure of wage rates. more important ly , for women in sex segregated work, it raises the question: what is the nature and function of the work that women have traditionally performed in our society? what is the 'real value' of women's work? in early october, 1977, local 31 of the steel plate examiners at the british american bank note company in ottawa went on strike for equal pay. their demand was for equal pay with some of the men in their plant whom they contended were doing jobs of considerably less skill and responsibility than their own. there was more than one dollar difference between the full hourly rate of pay of the lowest paid men in the plant and the women. in addition, the male 'floor boys' started at a higher rate of pay and achieved the maximum rate after one year; the women did not achieve their full rate until they had been with the company for two years.* the steel plate examiners local was, therefore, demanding a 29.2% increase which would have given them parity with the lowest paid male workers in the plant. during negotiations and until the local went on strike in october, they had only received an offer of 3 12.8% by the company. but the strike was more than a strike about a specific wage increase. it was a strike about equal pay and as a result it became (somewhat after the fact) a 'cause celebre' for women's groups inside and outside the labour movement in ontario. but this was the first strike in which the steel plate examiners local had ever been involved in their 4 thirty year history at the plant. the women, therefore, were fairly inexperienced in organizing for a strike. more importantly, however. because the political significance of their demands were not immediately apparent to them, they did not exploit to their advantage the broader political support of women which might otherwise have been available *stecl plate (examiners started at $3.75/hr., reaching a maximum of $5.00/hr. a^tcr two years. 23 co them. for this, and several other reasons which will be discussed later, the strike was not very successful in meeting their immediate demands. in particular, it did not succeed in changing the company's opposition to recognizing the local's claim to parity with the male workers. the women went back to work after nine weeks, having only obtained the agreement of the company to submit the dispute to arbitration. on april 13, 1978, owen shime, the arbitrator in the case, made his decision in favour of the company's original offer of 12.8% retroactive to may 1977. in view of the terms of reference of the case, the reasoning behind shime's decision seemed dubious to the counsel for the union and it was decided to submit the decision to judicial review. but the counsel later advised against this because it was felt that the chances of a reversal of the decision would be limited. instead, it was decided to put the case before the canadian human rights commission, which had coiie into being in january 1979 to act as a tribunal court on alleged contraventions of the canadian bill of rights. the decision to go this route was made because it could be argued that the company was contravening clause 11 of the federal bill of rights which provides for non-discrimination in pay on the basis of equal pay for work of equal . 6 value. although the company's main customer is the bank of canada, it was not at all clear whether the labour relations of this company would be held to fall within federal or provincial jurisdiction. nor was it clear whether the canadian bill of rights would take precedence ovt-r provincial legislation in labour relations. on february 26, 1980, the huaan rights tribunal decided 'with regret' that because the labour relations of the company did not fall under federal jurisdiction, the 24 equal pay clause in the canadian bill of rights could not apply. since the minister of labour for the province of ontario had already ruled before the strike commenced that the women were "not performing substantially similar work" to the men in the plant, the matter had not been put to the ontario human rights commission. for the future, therefore, the steel plate examiners have only two avenues open to them to improve their present position to rely on their own bargaining strength with the company or, together with the opposition parties and labour and women's pressure groups in the province, to put pressure on the government to change the legislation. in terms of the women themselves and the sustained effort which was demanded of them over the period of 2'-j years the outcome was more than just an economic setback, it was a defeat which struck at their own self respect as working women. as a result, the impetus for future 8 struggle around the issue in their local was seriously stunted. in terms of the industrial relations and legal systems within which these women were involved for that 2*s years, there exist serious barriers to the attainment of equal pay which" appear to be insuperable. these barriers exist for any group of women working in job 'ghettos' who seek to obtain equal pay for work of equal value through the collective bargaining process. an understanding of the structural barriers within the collective bargaining route tr~ the attainment of equal pay for work of equal value is essential if these are to be overcome for that goal to be reached. it is proposed in this paper, therefore, to examine in greater detail the collective bargaining/industrial relations process and the political appeal process as these affected the outcome of this specific case. while it will be difficult to generalize beyond this particular case 25 to any ocher case as to the final outcome, many of the same structural barriers and sets of assumptions that he behind these processes will exist in most collective bargaining situations. the case study 1. collective bargaining (a) the workplace, the company and its employees the british american bank note company is engaged in the business of engraving and printing of high security material such as bank notes, postage stamps, lottery tickets, share certificates and travellers cheques. the ottawa plant prints mainly bank notes and postage stamps and it is the only one of its four subsidiaries which operates the steel 9 plate presses. the company has been in operation since 1866 and was incorporated in 1909. it was in the control of the estate of the founder until 1929 when these holdings were bought out privately. shares were not offered on the stock exchange until 1945. since 1967 the company has been involved in a number of acquisitions and takeovers and has recently experienced expansion in sales and profits. in 1978 the company's net income increased by 45z. in the same year, sdes were up by 232. similarly, for the first 6 months of 1979, profits rose by 42z and sales by 211. in constant dollars, the company's earnings per share rose from $1.68 in 1974 to s^.62 in 1978 while in the same period profits rose from $754,000 to $2,528,000. the company is. therefore, a growing concern and it attributes this growth to "an expansion of the company's product base plus increased productive efficiency . the company has only one other major competitor, the canadian bank note company, also based in ottawa. 26 local 31 of the steel plate examiners is made up of 24 women whose average seniority at the company was 17 years at the time of the strike. the turnover of workers, therefore, is low and this is an 12 acknowledged asset to the company. the local is part of the international plate printers, die strippers and engravers union whose head office is in the u.s. the union has no full time personnel in ottawa and the locals have traditionally maintained a great deal of autonomy from the international and its other locals in bargaining. * 'phe steel plate examiners have also historically negotiated separately from the printers local and the five other unions in the plant. they have, however, negotiated jointly with the steel plate exaraiiers at the canadian 14 bank note company. these women are also members of local 31. working in pairs or threes, the r.xarainer's job consists of examining sva stacking the printed material as it comes off the presses. the fxatniner removes defective work and at the same rime, from about six possible problem areas connected with the specialized process, attempts to diagnose what might be causing the defect. if it is considered serious enough, the lxaminer is responsible for signalling problems to the printer or for stopping the press in order to rectify the problem. the steel plate examiners have first responsibility for determining whether the product is acceptable. failure to correct an error may result in excessive spoilage or damage to the machine. another group of workers, the graphic artists, carry out a later, more detailed examination of the printed material but they have nothing to do with the printing process itself. this group of workers is also made up of women and their rate of pay was the same as that of the examiners. these workers are members of the graphic artists international, local 'iss. 27 besides checking the printed material, the examiner is sometimes called upon to place tissue sheets between printed sheets. the presses deliver between 25 and 60 sheets per minute depending on the type of material printed and the press which is in use. the work was described by the arbitrator as "of a fatiguing nature". the basic training for the examiner is on the job training working with an experienced lxamimr. after three months the employee may work alone on the simpler processes or on a less demanding job and will then be moved gradually to more difficult work. an examiner is expected to be proficient after one year although the full rate of pay is not reached until after two years on the job. the company employs about 250 hourly paid workers at its ottawa plant and with the exception of one unrepresented group they are represented by 6 unions and covered by 11 separate collective agreements. the unions and the company, therefore, are engaged in a multiple collective bargaining situation with both skilled and unskilled workers. although this kind of craft bargaining situation can result in f.iirly established relationships between the rates of pay of the crafts, their helpers, apprentices and journeymen, pay differentials between the steel plate examiners and other semi-skilled and unskilled workers in the plant had widened in recent years. although the arbitration decision placed the main portion of the blame for this with the examiner's union and their ineffectiveness in bargaining, the women themselves argued that the differentials were the result of discriminatory hiring and training practices of the company. the company, thev argued, hired women only for training into the position of steel i'late l.xaminer. in addition, until the post arbitration period, women had not been giv«n the opportunity to apply for positions in the plant then held by men, such as printer's helper or porter. 28 there also seems to huve been nn attempt on the part of the company to control the labour market in tiie area. the job is fairly specialized and few similar jobs exist in the ottawa area but the women alleged that there was an unofficial agreement with the canadian bank note company not to hire each other's employees. because of the lack of mobility both inside and outside the firm, one possible explanation for the maintenance of wage discrimination inside the company was that it was able to take advantage of this situation to impose starting wages and wage settlements below those obtained in dollar terms by male workers. b) collective bargaining the one year collective agreement between the company and the union was due to expire in april 1977. in february 1977, under the terms of the agreement, the local notified the company of its intention to negotiate a new collective agreement in which "equal wages with the men on the floor" would be the central issue. at the same time, the local requested that joint negotiations be held with the canadian bank note company. the male workers with whom the women of local 31 were comparing themselves in their negotiations belonged to the lowest paid group of the ottawa printing specialties and paper products union. these workers were designated as "porters, paper handlers and cleaners" by the company and referred to as "porters" and "floor boys" by the women. the higher categories within this union were classed into three grades designated by the company as building maintenance workers. as of april 1977, the pry range for the lowest classified workers in this union was between $5.11 19 ard $6.26 and for the highest it was between $6.48 and $6.89. a second group of male workers with whom the women subsequently compared themselves during the arbitration process were the printer s 29 helpers, also members of the printers international union. these workers received two years on the job training and the rate of pay ranged from 20 $6.17 to $9.59 an hour after two years. the collective agreements of the other bargaining groups in the company were also due to expire at the beginning of may. the company agreed to commence bargaining with local 31 as all the other negotiations would hang on che outcome. the company's initial offer to all bargaining units was 8%. local 31 rejected this. by the middle of may negotiations seemed to be going nowhere and the president of local 31, shirley cooligan, wrote to the employment standards branch of the ontario ministry of labour asking them to investigate the matter as a case of wage discrimination on the basis of sex. the reply from the ministry indicated that because the women were not doing substantially similar work as the men, the matter did not fall under the ontario labour standards act. the ministry advised the local to pursue their goals through collective bargain4 21 ing. a conciliator was called in during the summer but neither the company nor the union was willing to move from their positions. as the possibility of a strike seemed to be no longer just a threat, in september the company increased its offer to 10% to all bargaining units, with an additional 2.8% to the examiners and the graphic artists from january. the graphic artists accepted this two-stage offer and the other all male bargaining units in the plant followed suit. the examiners at both companies again refused the offer because it did nothing to meet their demands for parity with the lowest paid male workers. a week before the strike was due to be called in mid-october, the company threatened to withdraw the usual retroactive pay clause if the local went out on strike. when it became obvious that thev would so either have to accept the company's latest offer or go out on strike and risk losing their back pay, the examiners from the canadian bank note company voted to accept their employer's latest offer which was the same as that of the british american bank note company. the acceptance of the two-stage pay increase by the graphic artists and later by the examiners from the canadian bank note company not only isolated the examiners at the british american bank note company in their strike action and rendered it much less effective than it might otherwise have been, but it also jeopardized their case in the arbitration hearing. the british american bank note company made the case that the examiners had requested joint bargaining with the canadian bank note company. because the workers there had accepted their employer's latest offer, it was questionable, argued the company, whether the higher claims of the british american employees were legitimate. but the fact was that negotiations were never actually carried on jointly. the tvo companies seem to have made the same offer to both sets of workers and the local, as far as possible until the strike was called, maintained a unified bargaining position. in early october 1977, the examiners at the british american bank note company were in a legal position to strike and they voted to do so on october 14, with the explicit demand that this was a strike for 22 equal pay for work of equal value. c) the strike the strike lasted for nine weeks and the picket line was 'manned' every day and night during that period. the women received only $25.00 a week in strike pay and this was due to run out after the tenth week. although the plant was never at any time completely shut down during the strike, production slowed down considerably after a few weeks. this was largely because the printers refused to cooperate with the 31 company in putting two men on each press, one of whom, it was intended, should perform the examiner's tasks. although some picketing was successful in keeping out suppliers and maintenance people, in order not to alienate their fellow workers. local 31 agreed that other workers in the plant could cross the picket line. the picket was not successful, however, in its main purpose of blocking the shipping out of material for delivery to the bank of canada. nor was it successful in preventing some material from being sent to the company's plant in montreal. nevertheless, because the printers refused to cooperate with the company in working with blackleg labour, production at the ottawa plant slowed down enough so that by the beginning of 23 december, the printers and several other employees were laid off. the company did not approach the union for further negotiations until the women had been on strike for two weeks, at which time they merely 2 4 repeated their previous offer. the mediator was called in on the fifth week of the strike. at this point the union understood that arbitration was not a possible alternative in this case, even though they believed that the company favoured this solution. the confusion over this was cleared up and the union and the company met with the mediator early in december to discuss the issue. the mediator later met with the union privately and indicated that they would have to spell out the terms of the arbitration very carefully if they wanted to have the case considered on the basis of equal pay. the terms were then the subject of further negotiation with the company over a period of about one week before the 25 strike was finally called off. the company had attempted to counteract the effects of the strike in two specific ways. firstly, there was an attempt to maintain production in^idr the pl.int by persuading the printers and the graphic artists 32 lo take on the l-'xaroiner s' work. when this failed because of the lark of cooperation from the printer's union, the company shipped material to its montreal plant for processing and checking. the company s strategy to obtain cooperation from other workers to help break the strike took the form of persuasion and threat. in the first instance, the company contrived to set those employees still working in the plant against the striking workers. meetings were called and letters sent to employees who were laid off 'explaining' the situation. although the all female graphic artists' union seems to have been willing to comply with the company's request, the printers' union refused to cooperate by working two men to a press. it was then suggested by the company to the printers that if the strike was allowed to continue technological changes 27 might have to be introduced, putt ing some of the printers' iobs in jeopardy. what finally persuaded the women to go back to work was their own economic hardship combined with what they knew to be the economic h.irdship of the other employees from the plant who had been laid off." the printers, for instance, were in a particularly bad situation because not only were they not receiving strike pay, but the uic had ruled that because they were members of the same international as the stnikinc employees, they were ineligible for uic payments.^ christmas was approaching and the strike pay was running out. the local voted to return to work and on december 15, the union met with the company to discuss submitting the easv. to arbitration. 2. arbitration instead of the 29.2% originally demanded durine bargaining, the local changed its demand in the arbitration brief to equal pay for work of equal value based on job evaluations drawn up by an expert from cupe. on this reckoning, the steel plate examiner's job fell between that of $3 printer's helper and the floor boy/portor and would need a 772 pay inc31 rease to give the women parity. the terms of reference of the arbitration case agreed between the union and the company, however, were somewhat ambiguous as to the question 32 of equal pay for work of equal value. in the written agreement to send the matter to arbitration dated december 17, the dispute was described as one which had "arisen out of a difference of opinion between the parties on the merits of skill and responsibility of a job with the company regardless of sex." following this preamble, the specific point for arbitration was specified as "the rate of wage to be paid to the examiners during the term of the contract." the union's brief in the arbitration case used the opening paragraph of the agreement as the definition of what the dispute was about. with the use of evaluations, therefore, the union was able to compare the jobs and the rate of pay for the examiners with that of other (male) jobs and rates of pay for the men in the plant who were closely conm-cred with the printing process. the company, on the other hand, chose to b;ise its case solely on the question of the rate of pay. in doing so they compared the examiners to the graphic artists who performed an examination function inside the plant and to workers doing similar work outside the company in the federal government or the printing industry. the arbitrator, owen shime, took the middle ground between these two positions. in doing so, he circumvented the issue of equal pav for work of equal value because he addressed the question of sex discrimination separately from that of comparability. this undermined the union's argument that the two were inevitably linked because of the 'job ghetto' situation inside the plant which had been created by the hiring ami training practices of the company. secondly, because shine argu<-d that 14 the method of job evaluation had historically not been used in collective bargaining in the printing industry, he ignored the union's calculation of where the examined job stood in relation to others at the plant. shime dealt with the comparability issue explicitly from the point of view of the traditional collective bargaining practices in the printing industry. thiitily, shime argued that the arbitration process was not a 'judgement' but an 'adjudication' based on what existed in similar jobs and situations elsewhere, and/or, if applicable, on a set of historical relationships which have been established over time. shime, therefore, ruled out the possibility that the arbitration could be a precedent setting case which would in any way alter established practices. more specifically, shime refused to accept the union's case of comparability on the basis of job evaluation for three reasons: 1) the history of bargaining in the printing industry had been 'splintered' and "the relationships among workers were not capable of being analyzed on a purely rational or objective basis." 2) the job evaluations provided by the union had been 'too selective' because they had not included the graphic artists at british american who were paid similar wages as the examiners. because the issue of pay was separated from the issue of d iscr itninat ion . he did not take up the question of job ghetto iza tion. 3) the job evaluation had not been the result of a consultative process with the company but had been unilaterally formulated by the union. while shime did not argue against the union's case that the company, because of its profitable record, had the ability to pay the wage demanded, he agreed with the company that its competitive position had to be taken into account and that the settlement of a 77% wage demand could jeopardise this. although the companydid not fall within the terms of reference of the aib, it also made the case in its brief that because 35 wage and price controls were in effect in canada at that time, a wage settlement above the norm set by the anti-inflation board regulations would b« inflationary and irresponsible.36 addressing the question of discrimination, shime agreed with the ontario ministry of labour that the work was 'not similar' to that of the male workers. he argued in fact that the work of the floor boys was 'dirtier' than that of the examiners and this could account for the difference in wages. in this context, the usual criteria of skill and responsibility were ignored. in his concluding remarks, shime argued that while there was inconsistency in the wage rates of the floor boys and the examiners, this was not necessarily evidence of discrimination on the part of the company. instead, he made two kinds of argument which, while it attributed the difference in pay to the collective bargaining process, also placed the solution in that arena. firstly, the work force in the industry is splintered into multiple bargaining units which of itself produces inconsistency in wage bargaining. since this occurs elsewhere under similar conditions, he argued, inconsistency was nor unusual and was not evidence of discrimination. secondly, the wage rate of the 'floor boys' could be' accounted for by more effective collective bargaining on the part of their union. the solution to the widening differentials and the different rates of pay between the two sets of workers, therefore, lay in the collective bargaining process. on this question shime took a similar position to that of the ontario ministry of labour. the onu;; was quite clearlv put upon the steel plate examiners' local and the printer's union to bargain more effectively on behalf of the women. furthermore, shime accepted the company's argument that in comparison with the rraphlc artists at the company and other examiners at the bank v, of canada and the federal government, as well as in other printing establishments elsewhere, the wagi> offered to the steel plate examiners was 'a fair one'. again the question of job ghettos—whether the examiners at the other plants were also women or predominently womin--was not addressed, nor could it be under the terms of reference which the arbitrator had set for himself. shime also accepted the company's argument that because the offer of 12.8% had been accepted by the steel plate examiners at the canadian bank note company as a result of the "normal, bilateral bargaining and decisionmaking process", the charge of discrimination on the basis of sex could not be upheld. the union's argument , that the women at the canadian bank note company had made their own decision to accept the offer of ] 2 . 8% after an assessment of the possibilities of winning a strike, was discounted. on the one hand, shime argued that it was up to the union to rectify the problem of widening wage differentials and ensure that it was not a party to an agreement which contravened the labour relations act forbidding discriminatory bargaining practices. on the other hand, he argued that "the process of making the decision about wage rates was bilateral, and it is reasonable to infer that it was arrived at in the normal collective bargaining process after a relative assessment of bargaining strength, including the willingness of the members to withdraw their services." on the basis of these arguments the arbitrator's decision was in favour of the company's original offer to the union of 12.8%. 3. the political and legal processes a) political pressure after being notified by the ontario ministry of labour that the ontario legislation would not cover their case, the executive of local 31 went beyond the collective bargaining process in an attempt to bring polit37 ical pressure to bear on the company both during and after the negotiat ions. contact was made with the clc and the ofl, both of whom made unsuccessful attempts tc change the situation. shirley carr, vice president of the ci.c, appealed to the then minister of labour bette stephenson to put a wider interpretation on the implementation of the ontario human rights act. the ofl convention which was held during the strike voted to make representation to the government to amend the ontario legislation.39 because of the federal government's connection with the company, appeals were made by the clc to the federal minister of labour, john munro, to put pressure to bear on the company to change its bargaining position. ottawa ndp mla's evelyn cigantes and ndp provincial leader michael cassldy both raised questions in the ontario legislature on the issue of the need 40 to change the present legislation. the matter was later taken up by the ndp through a private member's bill. this was defeated in committee in early 1980. u most of the political pressure and lobbying activity was reported in the media at the time of the strike ,-ind while it made the case something of a 'cause celebre' it served little to change the situation for the steel plate examiners. since the company was not directly involved in selling to the public, adverse publicity of this kind could have little impact. although the publicity served to drum up some financial support for the strikers from women's groups across the province, most of this arrived after the strike had ended. initially, the executive of the local had been reluctant to take the issue outside the union movement and it was particularly reluctant to rake what it conxtdited to he an extreme militant position, for example. by expanding their picket line to include women's nroups or to a 1 low the issue to become the focus of mass demonstrations or meetings. although the women had been aware in the early stages of the strike that political pressure might be needed to change the company's bargaining position, this was seen in terms of the legitimate channels of the democratic political process— letters to mp's, lobbying by recognized pressure groups (the clc, ofl) and raising the matter with the political parties in opposition at queen's park. 44 while it was unsuccessful in terms of the examiners' specific case, the political pressure did have some repurcussions, however. in early 1980, the ontario minister of labour upgraded the employment standards branch inspectorate by hiring 11 more inspectors in an effort to remove the onus of complaint from the individual employee. as a result, within the first few weeks of the new program, several new cases of wage discrimination were uncovered in the province, even though the branch is still operating under the original terms of reference of 'equal pay for similar work . premier davis, under pressure from womnn in his own party on the issue, in the spring of 1980 promised a new conservative bill which would address the issue of equal pay for work of equal value. in malcing this announcement, however, he cautioned that implementation of this kind of legislation could be difficult. given the government's previous record with its existing legislation, the warning is probably appropriate, b) the human rights commission the strike ended in december 1977. in january 1978, the federal government's human rights commission came into operation. during the course of the strike .quest ions had been raised in parliament about the federal government's responsibility in the case because section 11 39 of the canadian human rights act bases sex discrimination in wages on equal pay for work of equal value. cordon fairweather, the chairman of the commission, had issued a statement indicating that if the strike was not settled when the commission came into operation in january 1978. the commission would examine the case. although he indicated at that time that the company's affairs fell under provincial jurisdiction, because the company did a large amount of its business with the federal government through the bank of canada, it could be argued that it was a government contractor. in this case, the human rights act had provisions in section 19 for the governor in council "to make recommendations respecting the terms and conditions to be included in or applicable to any contract, licence or grant."" questioned on the possibility of using this provision in the commons, prime minister trudeau replied that this would be "a completely incorrect procedure." "as a matter of principle we do not encourage third parties to involve themselves in disputes by exercising any kind of economic boycott. it seemed unlikely, therefore, that fairweather 's willingness to take up the issue on the basis of the government's contractual position and its responsibility under the act would nor receive the necessary cabinet backing. nevertheless, when the arbitration failed to meet the union'-; demands, instead of proceeding with a judicial review of the case, which was initially planned, the union decided to leave the matter in the hands of the federal human rights commission. the hearing took place in december 1979 and judgement in the case was handed down in march 1980 . the tribunal arrued, firstly, th.it the nature of the act was human rights, clearly d if f erent iat lf)r it from the 40 narrower aspects of labour legislation. secondly, they argued that the unintended scope of the canadian human rights act had been fairly narrowly defined by parliamentary discussion when it was enacted. during parliamentary debate on the issue it was clear that the act was not intended to have wide ranging constitutional jurisdiction under civil law. even here, the residual powers of the "peace, order and good government" clause of the british north america act had not been invoked which might have ensured that the act had universal applicability in canada. the human rights act specifically stares that the legislation is to "extend the present laws in canada to give effect, within a purview of matters coming within the legislative authority of the parliament of canada." this was interpreted by the tribunal to mean that the act only applies to enterprises falling under federal jurisdiction and that it should not be seen as "an attemor to supplant existing provincial legislation in the field, but rather to supplement it by filling in some of the gaps left by it." giveii this rather narrow interpretation of the scope of the act, the tribunal had to decide, it was argued, whether the business of the british american bank note company fell under provincial or federal jurisdiction in the matter of human rights. basing their discussion on two precedent cases, it was argued that while the control of paper money, which was the major part of the company's business, was clearly a matter of federal competence, it could not be argued on this basis that the employment practices of the company also fell under federal jurisdiction in respect to human rights. the employment practices of the company were already covered by the ontario human rights act and by ontario labour legislation and there could only 41 be a basis for supplementing this legislation if the practices of the company's operation in other than actual bank note production amounted to discrimination in their provision of services to the general public. since the company's employmen t practices did not come into the specific category of the actual issuing of paper money (such as banking) which would have placed it in the category of the federal government's incidental control, it was decided that the matter of wage discrimination in this case did not come within the powers of the tribunal. in making its decision, the tribunal reasoned the case on the basis of precedents which, although they were about employment, were not argued in terms of human rights but in terms of the constitutionality of the question. the question of human rights, therefore, was clearly viewed as subordinate to the question of constitutional jurisdiction. while it could be argued that the tribunal was unnecessarily narrow in its interpretation of the scope of the act, it was constrained by political realities. the tribunal itself acknowledged the act's weak position both legally and constitutionally by suggesting several ways in which, given the will to do so, parliament could have expanded the act's efficacy and 52 jurisdiction. it has already been noted that, in theory, under the terms of the act, the federal government had the power to act. but that it did not do so. this reluctance is comprehensible in both political and economic terms. apart from the sensitive political considerations surrounding the question of federal or provincial jurisdiction in this area, the federal government would have been setting a precedent with fairly broad ramifications for the labour relations system in the private sector if it had extended the concept of equal pay for work of equal 12 value to include companies with any kind of contractual relations with the federal government. the political repurcussions would have been even greater, however, if the human rights tribunal had not been careful to differentiate the human rights aspects of the act's power from thst of labour legislation. the human rights commission is now in the process of appealing the tribunal's decision in the supreme court of appeal. civen, however, the fairly weak position of the act constitutionally and legally, and the politically ascendant position of provincial jurisdictions in recent years, it is unlikely that a decision coming down in favour of the commission's case will remain unchallenged by the province of ontario or the company. conclusions the above case study has documented one instance in which equal pay for work of equal value became the explicit demand of a union in the process of a collective bargaining situation. but the strike was to all intents spd purposes defeated. although the organizational structure of the unions in the plant was in part to blame for both the discrepency in pay and for the failure of the strike, it is also clear that the defeat was only possible because the issue was either obscured or deflected by the processes and ideological discourse within which the issue was fought out. this 'mystification' of the real issue of the value of women's work, however, raises contradictions, which upon examination, become very apparent. while the union was defeated on the issue in this specific instance, the kind of demands they were making will not go down into historical oblivion. for many women inside and outside the labour movement, it has served as yet another example of the limitations of the 43 present legislation in ontario. but more than this, a close examination of the structure and ideology of collective bargaining reveals the full weight of the kind of barriers which must be overcome if women are to achieve equal pay in practice. concretely, the reasons for the failure of the examiners to achieve their goals within the collective bargaining and industrial relations system are obviously complex. as far as the local itself was concerned, these related to both organizational and ideological factors. it seems that the women had only relatively recently begun to feel justified in demanding equal pay. indeed, the initial demands were not for equal pay for work of equal value but only for parity with the lowest paid men in the plant. even here, there was some reluctance on the part of the other all-female local at the plant to support local 31 in this demand. although all the women in local 31 supported the strike in principle, it seems to have been a relatively small group within the local who felt strongly enough about the issue to take on the tasks of organization. there seems to have been a profound sense among this group of women that the situation at the plant was intolerable. having voiced their grievances to fellow workers on a number of occasions, they were taunted by some of the male workers for seeming to be unable 53 to do anything about their situation. their demand only became one for 'equal pay for work of equal value' after the strike had commenced and their attempts to close the gap in pay using existing means were fruitless. in the arbitration case, the union took up the principle of equal pay for work of equal value because it was the only logical way to present thdr case .which rested on comparability with the male workers. this demand was one which evolved as confrontation proceeded a.nd the issue became more clear. this unplanned approach to 14 a politically sensitive aril yet powerful issue had both advantages and disadvantages. it meant on the one hand that the strike had not been designed specifically to challenge the legislation. this 'political innocence' and the fact that the women were prepared to work within the existing legislation and structures served to highlight the inadequacy of the ontario legislation in a way which a more politically motivated strike might not have done. partly because of the local's autonomy in decision making, the nature of their demands developed spontaneouslv. while there were drawbacks in the lack of strategy, it also meant that there were few constraints on tailoring their strategy in the interests of the long-term. thus, by the time the strike was over, the issue and its real nature had been brought into clear focus, not only for the women themselves but for a broader public who were fcllowing the case, by the apparent audacity of their claim. on the other hand, the lack of planning and of a clear strategy also meant that there were loopholes in making a consistent case before the arbitrator which gave the company the opportunity to argue that the local's demands were inconsistent and unreasonable. the high degree of autonomy enjoyed by the local may also, in the long run, have worked against them. owen shime was perhaps correct in claiming that the union itself was in part to blame for the situation in which the women initially found themselves. the international seems to have done little or nothing to remeay what had been a fairly longstanding practice of hiring and wage discrimination by the employer. although the strike was legally recognized by the international and the women received a small amount of strike pay for the duration of the strike, they were left to themselves to organize and drum up support for the strike both inside 45 and outside the plant. local 31, like several of the other locals at the plant, is part of an old international craft union. these unions have traditionally taken little interest in 'politicizing' their members or putting their weight behind issues which take on an overt political content. the fact that the strike took place in a craft union shop placed not only organizational, but ideological, constraints on the polit icization of the issue inside and outside the plant. solidarity amongst the women in the plant was not uniformly maintained and the multi-union situation did not help to create it, but tended rather to foster competition between the two all-female locals. when the collective bargaining process failed, the issue was brought into the political arena. as discussed earlier, the women in the local initially had a great deal of confidence in the democratic political process and they were not reticent about trying to make their complaints heard. but they tended to see politics only in institutional terms. protest was directed through established pressure groups or members of parliament. such overt political action as there was was planned in accordance with this view. there was little appreciatbn on th'e part of the local that lobbying the ndp or liberal opposition parties at queen's park or writing to the local mla was unlikely to effect an immediate change in the ontario law or its implementation on their behalf. the other side of the coin to the obstacles created by the union organizational structure and the lack of strategy was the collective bargaining and arbitration process itself. as is clear from shiroe's report, this took place within a set of ideological assumptions about what constitutes a 'just' or 'fair' wage. within the discourse of collective bargaining and the industrial relations system, a wage which has been bargained for is, by definition, a fair one. according to the labour practices act, only where a union knowingly accepts a discriminatory wage rate is such a wage considered discriminatory. although it was recognized that the bargaining strength of a particular union can in reality vary and that this would have implications for the outcome, this was not considered to be an argument which justified intervention to rectify unequal or discriminatory wage practices on the part of the arbitrator. the onus, therefore, to achieve a 'fair wage' was placed entirely with the union. in other words, the structure of collective bargaining itself, for the purposes of reaching an arbitration decision, was considered to be a situation in which the union and the employer meet as equals. within thp discourse of the industrial relations system, therefore, collective bargaining is extracted from the unequal relationship which exists structurally between capital and labour and is assumed to take place between equals. the findings of this case study have immediate practical implications for the women's movement. but the case study also raises interesting questions for further study by sociologists. has the present ontario legislation, for instance, contributed to the problem of job ghettoization because one means of getting around the legislation is through discriminatory hiring and training practices? to what extent does the structure and practice of trade unions help to maintain job ghettos? to what extent is it possible that the demand for equal pav for work of equal value could present a challenge to the pattern of rewards which now exist in society, and what are the implications of this? these are just some of the quest ions which might be pursued by those interested in further research in this area. 47 but there are also practical lessons to be drawn from this case study. firstly, women in the union movement must learn tc work and fight together for equal pay. traditional, particularistic, union or trade interests and loyalties must be re-examined in the light of the equal pay principle. this may mean struggles will emerge within unions and between unions as much as they do with employers. secondly, women cannot afford to rely solely on the legislative process to change their situation. legislation must be interpreted and put to the test before its effectiveness can be judged. more progressive legislation can only back-up militant and united union struggle for the abolition of wage discrimination in practice at the work place. 18 footnotes 1 besides the federal llumnn rights legislation, b.c. and quebec do not limit equal pay rights to the same work. but there are constraints in both provinces on the universal application of equal pay for work of equal value. see lynn mcdonald, "equal pay-how far off?" c anadian dimension , vol. 14, no. 6, 1980. 2 see jule white, women in unions , ottawa: advisory council on the status of women, 1980, for statistical information on women in unions in canada. 3 affidavit of shirley cooligan, president of local 31, steel plate examiners union, august 2, 1978. 4 union brief to arbitration hearing. february 7, 1978. 5 arbitration decision of mr. owen shime, april 13, 1978. 6 interview with lynn kaye, counsel for the union, april 1980. 7 the decision of the canadian human rights tribunal, februarv 26, 1980, p. 19. 8 interview with shirley cooligan, former president of local 3 1 , steel plate examiners union, april 1980. 9 the details of the company's operations were taken from f>ven shime's arbitration decision, op . c i t . 10 the details of the company's financial position were taken from the financial post corporations service, revised edition, december, 1979, 11 union brief to arbitration hearing, february 7, 1978. 12 interview with personnel officer at british american bank note co., april 1980. 13 other than strike pay, the international did very little to help the local win its strike or the arbitration. in the latter case the local received considerable help from cupe. 14 arbitration decision, op.cit . 15 this description of the work and the workplace is based on the union brief, the company's brief and the arbitration decision, op . c i t 16 interview with shirley cooligan and maureen mckenney, january 1978 . 17 this does not account for the genesis of wage discrimination. in an interview with the ottawa journal in december 1977, r.p. white, vice chairman of the company is quoted as saying that "it wastraditional in the industry for men and women to be segregated in different unions and job categories." he also observed that a lot of women were second wage earners but contended that this was 'hot a reason why they received lower wages." 18 letter dated february 25, 1977, from maureen mckenney, secretary of the local to industrial relations manager at british american bank note company. 19 union brief to arbitration hearing, op . c i t . 20 ibid 21 letter from employment standards branch of the ontario ministry of labour, may 26 1977. 22 this account of the negotiations was taken from the arbitration documents and from interviews with shirley cooligan, union president and lynn kaye, the local's counsel. 23 this account is based on interviews with shirley cooligan and maureen mckenney in november 1977 and january 1978. 24 affidavit of shirley cooligan, august 2, 1978. 25 there was some confusion on the part of the union as to whether the case could legally be put to arbitration. according to cooligan the union was told during the mediation proceedings in november that the case was not eligible for arbitration. mien it was finally realized that it was, negotiations began with the company through the mediator as to the terms of reference for arbitration. 26 the company changed its trucking contractor during the strike because brinks drivers refused to cross the picket lines. the company then hired rydcrs trucking co. whose drivers crossed the picket line. 27 interviews with shirley cooligan and maureen mckenney with mr. kuiack of the printers union, november 1977. 28 many of the women in local 31 were heads of single parent families or the main bread winners in their family. 50 29 citizen , december, 1977 30 union reply to company brief to arbitration hearing 31 union brief to arbitration hearing, op.cit 32 the union made the case in its rebuttal to the company's brief that the terms of reference were clear and that they had been the point of protracted negotiations between the parties for almost a week in mid-december indicating that the intention was clear. agreement to arbitrate december 17, 1977. 33 agreement to arbitrate, december 17, 1977. 34 arbitration decision, op . c i t . 35 ibid 36 company's brief to arbitration hearing, op.cit . 37 arbitration decision, op.cit . 38 ibid 39 press reports, november-december, 1977. 40 press reports, december 1977. 41 maclean 's magazine, april 1980. 42 interview with shirley cooligan and maureen mckenney, january 1978. 43 discussion with shirley cooligan in late october, 1977. 44 ibid 45 citizen , april 1980. 46 davis stated that he favoured a program of affirmative action. this largely skirts the problem of wage discrimination in iob ghettos by concentrating on upgrading the skills of a united number of women. the solution is thus individualized. ( i t izen , april 15, 1980. 47 citizen , december 1977 48 ibid 49 the canadian human rights act, tribunal decision, february 26, 1980. si 50 the cases used as precedents were construction montcalm vs. minimum wage commission and one which was referred to as the steevedoring case. counsel for the respondent made his case on the former while the commission's counsel made his case on the latter. both cases concerned the question of federal or provincial jurisdiction over labour relations for firms whose operations included some connection with areas of federal jurisdiction, e.g., aeronautics and shipping. 51 the tribunal's decision was based on the montcalm case in which justice baetz had argued that although the company was engaged in operations (the construction of an airport) which clearly came under federal jurisdiction, its employee relations were fundamentally an integral part of these operations and therefore this came under provincial jurisdiction. 52 tribunal decision, op.cit . 53 based on interviews with shirley cooligan and maureen mckenney october 1977, november 1977 and january 1978. trade unions and the state: an interpretative essay on the historical development of class and state relations in canada, 1889 1947 daniel glenday and christopher schrenk introduction this essay investigates the interaction between the canadian state and trade unions during the first half of this century primarily in terms of the political incorporation of trade unions in canada. the basis of our investigation is the work of those theorists who spoke to the importance of the state and trade unions under advanced capitalism and whose familiarity in this area aided our historical exploration. we discovered that incorporation of canada's unions was an uneven process with the federal level taking the lead over the provincial. we conclude by expanding on certain notions of the state and the role trade unions play within advanced capitalism. theories stressing the limits and possibilities of trade union action in capitalist societies can be subsumed under two broad categories. first, what might broadly be termed the sociological tradition was founded upon such writers as s. perlman (1928) in the united states and sidney and beatrice webb (1902) in the united kingdom. more recently, a group based at the berkeley institute of industrial relations and which included such noted academics as daniel bell, r. dubin, clark kerr, s.m. lipset and a.m. ross came to dominate the field in the 1950 ' s and 1960 ' s . in britain as well there are many theorists who belong in this tradition. some, such as alan fox (1974) and j.h. goldthorpe (1974) are more 'radical' in their approach while others like h.a. clegg (1951), a. flanders (1965), h.a. turner (1962), g.s. bain (1970), to mention only a few, remain more "liberal" in their orientation. second, there is the marxist tradition which 114 trade unions and the state includes revolutionaries such as k. marx, a. grams ci , r. luxemburg, v. lenin and l. trotsky. it is represented today by a growing number of young practioners, mostly, though not exclusively, from great britain: robin blackburn (1967), victor allen (1972), richard hyman (1971) and perry anderson (1967). the sociological approach the dominant sociological approach centres on the changing dynamics of class consciousness and class conflict under advanced capitalism. distilling from the literature, we can outline at least five major interrelated propositions. first, industrialization is depicted as a modernizing trend which will eventually eliminate vestiges of traditional institutions and values. in other words, the secular will come to replace the sacred. second, as michael mann (1973: 10) notes with reference to the "end of ideology" theorists, their "central tenet would be that there is an inherent strain in the industrialization process toward the compromise of class interests and the institutionalization of conflict." third, once institutionalized, class conflict becomes isolated or fragmented into separate spheres of dispute. this is due to an argument that sees the institutionalization of conflict necessarily involving the isolation of economic from political action. as mann further argues "the institutionalization of industrial conflict is nothing more nor less than the narrowing down of conflict to aggressive economism and defensive control" (mann, 1973: 21). in addition, it is held that such conflict is so fragmented that it no longer threatens social stability but becomes a functional part of 2 society. put another way, the segmentation of life in advanced capitalist society constitutes an obstacle to the realization of class consciousness (dunlop: 1958). fourth, the rising standard of living or working class affluence in advanced industrial societies inevitably 115 alternate routes leads to a decline in conflict. and, finally, the working class is reasonably content with its lot and exhibits little indication of alienation, deprivation or socialist consciousness. trade unions enter the picture as reducing the class nature of the conflict by focusing almost exclusively on economistic or instrumental demands. they represent the organization apparatus which has plugged into the complicated web of government and business agencies, boards and committees. although it varies from industry to industry, general 1y the older the labour union, the more complete the institutionalization of class conflict would be, thereby reducing the necessity for the organization to exhibit a radical political content. the process of institutionalization is never complete. the sociological explanation for why this happens can be reduced to two root factors. first, we must consider the particular characteristic of each national economy; this includes the important differences in the industrial segments of mining, and manufacturing, and the service sector which, in turn, result in variations in the level of legitimate trade union involvement in the national economy. second, employers of labour become critical components in the working out of the role of trade unions under capitalism. as employer attitudes change away from what richard lester has called the "commodity concept" of employment to the "welfare concept", a reduction in the intensity and violence of industrial conflict results. on the other hand, the reverse is also true. class conflict will intensify if the employer refuses to play by the rules of the game which include trade union recognition and collective bargaining (ingham: 1974: 16). the major thrust of the sociological approach characterizes capitalist social relations as tending towards the isolation of conflict into separate industrial disputes and the narrowing of lift trade unions and the state conflict to aggressive economism provided the employer will play the game. in all, compromise and sectoral conflict are seen to be the dominant tendencies which bear on the problem of trade unions under advanced capitalism. the marxist tradition the sociological approach has indeed borrowed many of the ideas which were germane to the marxist tradition. a key difference is the 3 political thrust of their arguments. while the sociological approach ends with the limited or constrained political role of trade unions the marxist tradition moves in a revolu tionary direction while at the same time acknowledging certain limitations to trade union action under capitalism. the limitations of trade union action under capitalism were seen to be the result of the fact that trade unions crystal li zed or institution alized the existence of the working class in the factory. they did not transcend capitalist social relations. trade unions were the expression of class relations and as such would become a prisoner of them. consequently, as lenin came to argue, the labour movement by itself can only develop trade union consciousness that is, "the conviction that it is necessary to combine in unions, fight employers and strive to compel the government to pass necessary labour legislation" (1967: 117). such consciousness, he argues, cannot transcend the existing social structure without the intervention of a revolutionary party. socialism as the political generalization of immediate economic interests had to be learned, and it was up to the party cadres to become the active participants within the working class to bring about the desired goal. we do not intend to go into any detail on the historical experiences which led most revolutionaries to this position, nor will we delve into the important differences in strategy and tactics within this 117 alternate routes tradition. the problematic of the contracted political role of trade unions under advance capitalism is shared by both the marxist and sociological traditions each of which provides some indication as to why this has occurred. what distinguishes the marxist tradition from the sociological approach centers on the theoretical analysis of the exploitive relationship between capitalists and workers. the inherently antagonistic interests between the two great classes of capitalism rest on the appropriation of surplus value by capitalists from the working class. therefore, the incorporation of the working class and its organizations can only be of limited success. the fundamental contradiction still remains and is a constant source of conflict for the system as a whole (hyman, 1975: 68, 96, 103). one, but by no means the only marxist to contribute to the understanding of this problematic was leon trotsky. just before his assassination he was investigating the question of the role of trade unions under late ...capitalism (1975). he added certain dimensions to the study of this problem by stressing trade union bureaucratization and the "growing together" of "modern trade union organizations throughout the i world" with the state (1975: 68). he saw this process as being "equally characteristic of the neutral, the social democratic, the communist and the anarchist trade unions" because it derived from "social conditions common to all unions" (1975: 68-69). as with lenin, these common social conditions were seen to stem from the emergence of monopoly capitalism which forced trade unions to "confront a centralized capitalist adversary, intimately bound up with state power". as such, trade unions "insofar as they remain on reformist positions, i.e. on positions of adapting themselves to private property (must) adapt themselves to the capitalist state and ...contend for its cooperation" (1975: 69). unlike the sociological approach which made impressionistic 118 trade unions and the state references to the impact of industrialization on trade unions and the changing attitudes of employers, trotsky stressed the centralizing tendencies of capital and its connections with the state. this facilitated boththe consolidation of trade union organizations and their bureaucratization, a process which hyman (1971) refers to as trotsky's thesis of incorporation . here trotsky, more explicitly than lenin, encompasses in his examination the intentional strategies of industry and the state. he notes, how, particularly in periods of economic and political 'difficulty', government and leaders of large corporate enterprises deliberately plan to integrate trade unions into state structures thereby mitigating threats from below to the dominance of capital. while government and industry viewed positively an incorporated. and therefore more easily regulated and controlled labour force, the trade union leadership, for its own bureaucratic reasons also favoured such a development. trade union leaders would see their primary task as "freeing the state from the embrace of capitalism, in weakening its dependence on trusts, in pulling it over to their side" (1975: 69). in this manner, they mistakenly believed the "independence" of trade unions would be assured and a better deal for the workers could be extracted form the profits of monopoly capitalism. reformist leaders using their authority gained by "delivering the goods" in periods of expansion now function to condone, if not promote, this strategy. "implicit in this argument," says hyman (1971: 18), "is the thesis of incorporation: that union leaders, having acquired authority over their 4 members, are used to assist capitalism in controlling the workers." in a period of capitalist decline and crises, trotsky predicted that trade unions could move in one of two directions, either to serve as "secondary instruments of capitalism for the subordination and disciplining of workers or, on the contrary, the trade unions could 119 alternate routes become the instruments of the revolutionary movement of the proletariat" (1975: 71). the tendency (not "iron law"), towards incorporation differs fundamentally from the notion of the institutionalization of conflict discussed above. it is analysed as a tendency which attempts to temporarily counter the dynamic of class conflict. the conflictual dynamic between the two dominant social classes within capitalism is endemic to it and remains central here as it is in all writings within the marxist tradition. it is not necessary for this short essay to deal with the criticism that trotsky did not envision the durability of capitalism after world war ii and that his projections therefore failed to include the renewed basis for reformist action in the trade unions. his analysis has shown that one fruitful avenue to explore towards understanding the limited political role of trade unions would be an historical investigation of the interaction between the state and trade unions. to this question we now turn. trade unions and the state in canada: 1889 1947 over the past three-quarters of a century, a most important development for the working class in western capi talistcountries has been the expansion of the state's involvement in the class struggle. in the pages to follow, we intend to trace the historical development of the federal and provincial government's role in incorporating trade unions into specific state structures under the domination of capital. we begin our investigation by delving into some of the background statements and past positions taken by the federal government concerning labour legislation in canada. 120 trade unions and the state the royal commissions we intend to refer to two royal commissions, the royal commission on labour and capital (1889) and the royal commission on industrial relations (1919) , both influenced by similar musings in great britain, in order to outline the government's position on organized labour. first, the royal commission on capital and labour (1889) tells us that: labour organizations are necessary to enable working men to deal on equal terms with their employers. they encourage their members to study and discuss matters affecting their interests and to devise means for the betterment of their class. it is gratifying to be assured by many competent witnesses that labour bodies discourage strikes and other disturbances in industry, favour conciliation and arbitration for the settlement of disputes, and adopt conservative and legitimate methods for promoting the welfare of the producing members of society. it is in evidence that most labour bodies strive effectively to promote temperance throughout the country, and especially among their members (emphasis added). ,two points are clear from this statement. first, "responsible" and "competent" trade unions were those which were effectively able to foster "temperance" in their membership by "discouraging strikes" and "adopting conservative and legitimate methods" to achieve their ends. the royal commissioners sought trade union leaders who were willing and able to compromise on their demands and minimize disruptive acticns by the rank and file against the sanctity of property. second, to focus on the legitimacy of trade unions as bargaining agents with capital in the era of "laissez-faire" capitalism is one indication of the farsightedness of the commissioners. the commission argued that on the basis of testimony from individuals representing all sections of canadian society, trade unions should be accepted as representing the interests of the working class. their willingness to compete for rewards wi thin the system and not against 121 alternate routes it must have compelled the commissioners to view trade unions as "responsible" agents for the working class. as such, a further explanation for the position taken by the royal commission could have been due to the fact that industrialization was still in its infancy in canada. with an eye to great britain the commissioners may have felt that the exploitation and degradation of nascent capitalism there had resulted in indiscriminate acts of vandalism and destruction by the workers (e.g. luddism). the restraints which trade union organizations could exercise over their membership may have been seen as a means of protecting property and fixed capital from those same destructive tendencies which appeared to be. inherent in early industrial capitalist development. the political logic important as that early statement may have been, it must be qualified to scne extent. not all unions were viewed in this manner by both the federal and provincial levels of the canadian government. for instance, in 1903, a royal commission on industrial disputes in british columbia emphatically stated that "foreigners" from the united states who were nothing more than "socialist agitators of the most bigoted and ignorant type" should be punished for their trade union activities. these men came to canada for no other reason than to "keep up unceasing friction between the employer and the employed." the action taken by the federal government in this matter has been neatly summarized by john crispo: "this report sparked the senate of canada to propose a similar amendment to the criminal code. although the bill was defeated by an overwhelming margin in the house of commons, a member of the senate put forward a comparable bill four years later. this time, however, it was tossed out by the senate itself. the cma (canadian manufacturers association) proposal of two years later had no better luck. this scries of defeats hardly suggests that the canadian government was prepared to make an issue 122 trade unions and the state of international unionism (1967: 292). what we see emerging is the divergent paths which the two levels of the canadian government follow when they seek to interpret and deal practically with the role of trade unions in canadian society. the federal government will come to endorse their positive role, at least in words and occasionally in deeds, while the provincial governments will not, until many bitter struggles have been waged. but, it was not simply a matter of dealing with trade unions per se which annoyed the leaders of the more industrialized provincial governments; it was also the incursion of american-based international trade unions into 'their' territory. on the other hand, the federal government's position towards international unionism appeared to be an affirmation of their role and contribution to canadian society and industry. another important event which symbolized the federal government's positive attitude towards american-based international unions came when the president of the af of l was invited to address a joint session of both houses of parliament in april, 1917. this was the first time that such an invitation had been made to any labour leader. and, that it was not a canadian but an american labour leader "must be taken as a sign of the esteem in which international unions were hel c by the government of the day" (crispo, 1967: 292). twenty years later, we hear again the echo of the spectre of international trade unionism. this time it comes from mitchell hepburn, premier of the province of ontario. in commenting on the strike between the united auto workers and general motors at oshawa, ontario in 1937, hepburn remarked: the issue is whether or not foreign agitators, who already have brought the united states to a state of anarchy, were to attain their goal of smashing our export business. we know what these agitators are up to, they are working their way into the 123 alternate routes lumber camps, the pulp mills and our mines. well, that has got to stop and we are going to stop it. if necessary, we will raise an army to do so (ware, 1937: 66-67). all of the premier's rhetoric went to no avail. besides losing the minister of labour and the attorney general over the strike, he failed to enlist the support of the federal government in this matter. mr. king showed no sympathy for mr. hepburn's position, while the dominion minister of labour, the honourable norman mcleod rogers, laid down the dominion's attitude on the rights of trade union organizers crossing the border. he said that american organizers had free entry into canada as representatives of the af of l or the c.i.o. or any other organization. the dominion government had no interest in the differences among organizations whether native or alien and was ready to offer its conciliation services on request (ware, 1937: 70-71). the history of the quebec government's attitude towards international trade unionism is probably better known and is not significantly different from ontario's or british columbia's attitudes described above. the one important qualification concerns quebec's endorsement of the catholic syndicate movement at least up to the asbestos strike. the position of the federal government at this time, in contrast to the provincial governments was certainly aimed at facilitating the incorporation of international trade unions within the political framework of canadian society. the provincial governments and the canadian manufacturers association (cma), on the other hand, lobbyed against the international trade unions. they were prepared to support national trade union organizations against the international if need be, but would have preferred not to deal with trade unions at all. why do we see bifurcation of political interests on this issue? one plausible explanation, besides the oft noted influence of british legislative precedence on the federal government, rests with the economic interests which lie beneath both levels of the state apparatus. the 124 trade unions and the state federal government was allied to finance capital and foreign, primarily u.s. controlled, international corporations (armstrong and nelles, 1973; naylor,1975). big business is not always as challenged by trade union demands as are locally based industries since it is more difficult for a trade union to paralyze a large corporation than it is to close down a small domestic one. it is also noteworthy that the financial institutions, such as the large canadian banks, were always able to thwart unionization attempts and were therefore under no serious threat from the canadian labour movement. therefore, big business can, if necessary, tolerate trade unions and in the long run may even attempt to use them to their advantage (bendix, 1956; weinstein, 1968). the provincial governments and local business present a different case. the governments of more industrialized provinces such as ontario, quebec and british columbia were more strongly influenced by smallscale domestic manufacturing industries and the independent commodity producer (armstrong and nelles, 1973; nelles, 1974), whose political conservatism should be noted. during the first half of this century, many provinces felt the impact of the rise of important petit bourgeois parties (macpherson, 1953; quinn, 1960; young, 1971). putting these pieces together, we can argue that the parts played by both levels of the canadian state vis-a-vis trade unions can be understood if they are situated historically in terms of the two different class interests which they in many respects reflected. the provincial state's intransigence toward international trade unions, for instance, can be seen as a response to the small-scale businessman's fears that a large and, relatively speaking, powerful international trade union could destroy his business. such fears, on the other hand, would not necessarily be felt as strongly by banking and large-scale business interests which would explain the federal government's more positive 125 alternate routes attitude towards international unions. this interpretation is in part borne out by the royal commission on industrial relations commissioned in 1919. this commission was more analytical than the former study (1889) and therefore provides a clearer insight into the problem of class conflict in canada in the early 20th century. the problem, it seems, fell on the internal divisions within canada's capitalist class. employers may be divided into three classes -(1) those who deny the right of their employees to organize (2) those who, while not denying that right of their employees to organize, refuse to recognize organization among their employees. .. .and (3) those who not only admit the right of their employees to organize, but recognize and bargain with the organization on behalf of their employees... there are not many employers in canada who belong to the first class, but there are a very large number who belong to the second class. to the third class belong the great railway , telegraph and mining companies and many building trades . . . . we believe the frank acknowledgement of this right by employers will remove one of the most serious causes of unrest (emphasis added), g class struggle in canada was primarily seen as resulting from the large number of business organizations which did not acknowledge the legitimate role of trade unions in the nation's economy. it was only the giant corporations at this point in time which were able to transcend their parochial interests and face up to the legitimacy of the collective representation of workers in canada. the statements from these royal commissions have shown the federal state's concern for labour's role within canadian capitalist society. it only remains to describe the stages in which the federal government attempted to implement these concerns. the political 'praxis' the implementation of these concerns has followed roughly two stages. as indicated in the previous section, the federal government 126 trade unions and the state endorsed labour's contribution to the development of the canadian economy. however, government only provided for registration, conciliation and arbitration on a voluntary basis. the object of the industrial disputes investigation act of june 17, 1925 is essentially the voluntary settlement of disputes before they develop into stoppages of work. the instrument employed is an ad hoc body consisting of three membe rs , one appointed on the recommendation of the other two members. the minister of labour makes any appointments necessitated by failure to recommend., the principal problem with this arrangement, as soon became obvious, was the institutional separateness between the state, industry and organized labour. only in times of crisis and only through ad hoc committees do the three parties involved come together. as long as labour was ket out of society, then the potential for violence always remained. the establishment of appropriate labour legislation would permit if not the complete incorporation of labour, at least its significant integration through its organized representatives, within the state system. the process of establishing such procedures as trade union recognition and collective bargaining by the canadian state was about to begin. this leads us to the second phase -direct state intervention between capital and labour. the first piece of legislation to help accomplish this end became the federal government's adoption of p.c. 1003 in 1943. wartime labour relations board concerning the particular contribution of p.c. 1003 effected for the incorporation of organized labour into canadian society, professor logan notes: 127 alternate routes p.c. 1003 means the bringing of the wagner act and american experience under it to canada. but it involves more: for in some respects it goes beyond, while in others it modifies the pattern. it copies the american act in setting up a special board , in strictures it directs towards employers regarding unfair labour practises, in compelling negotiations in good faith with certified representatives of their workers, in vote taking, majority rule, etc. it goes beyond it: (1) in naming and prescribing unfair practices by unions (2) it goes beyond the american act also in assuming a responsibil i ty by the state to assist the two negotiating parties to reach agreement (3) it exceeds the american act again in that it forbids strikes and lockouts during negotiations and for the term of the agreement and compels the parties to fulfil (emphasis added). ,. the important points to bear in mind are contained in the thrust of the legislation towards state intervention and the behavioural control of trade unions. significantly, this piece of labour legislation set down the basic ground rules which management, certified trade unions and the state must still follow today. the machinery implemented to bring trade unions into canadian society was the wartime labour relations board, composed of a chairman and eight representatives of employers and employees -four from each group. the board's effect on trade union activity was immediately felt. the principal cause for many strikes, union recognition, had been removed. in the words of arthur macnamara, the deputy minister of labour during the war period: ...a wartime experiment in industrial relations was to prove to have more than temporary utility, and was subsequently embodied in peacetime legislation. this was the introduction, in 1944, of compulsory collective bargaining between employers and the certified bargaining representatives of their employees. . . . its introduction had the effect of virtually ending strikes over the issue of union recognition ; a result of considerable importance during a period when unions were more than doubling their membership (emphasis added). 128 trade unions and the state certainly the increasing pressure from below which came from the doubling of trade union membership in the first few short years of the war contributed to the canadian state's positive intervention in regards to trade union recognition (jamieson, 1973: 90-91). but on matters pertaining to manpower programs and social legislation, the canadian state took a more"cautious route" by consulting with labour, management and third parties before implementing policy. again, we hear from arthur macnamara: a significant feature of the manpower program was the care that was taken to consult with labour , management and other groups on policy matters. before regulations were passed and put into effect they were reviewed by the national selective service advisory committee, made up of representatives of labour , management, the armed forces, agriculture, the universities and other groups (emphasis added) j? in matters pertaining to social legislation, a similar procedure was followed: for example, the unemployment insurance act of 1940: ...the insurance fund, financed by compulsory contributions from the employer , employed worker and the government is an excellent example of responsibility and cooperation that may exist between groups of citizens (emphasis added).,.. the importance of these consultations did not rest in the equal status of the contending parties. indeed such was not the case as labour did not have an equal voice with management. what is significant centers on the conscious action by the federal state to open the ground for future acts of incorporation. conclusion in summary, with the above changes in industrial relations the various sections of the canadian trade union movement had by 1947 14 moved significantly in the direction of incorporation. they became increasingly enmeshed in the complicated machinery of state agencies beginning, of course, on the federal level. furthermore, this trend of the canadian labour movement was facilitated by the fact that, with the 129 alternate routes short-lived exception of western syndicalists, it had always been a reform movement and never desired to seriously challenge capitalist hegemony in canada. this despite the fact that at certain historical moments, such as the massive strike waves of the post-world wars and particularly the later years of the depression, a revolu tionary leadership could have posed a substantial challenge to corporate rule in canada. however, it was only when its legitimacy within the system was not guaranteed that the trade union movement felt compelled to display a show of force. once it gained recognition and collective bargaining rights and was accepted as an integral part of canadian society the dynamics of class conflict could become more routinized. as a social institution, the unions now form not only an integral part of the commun i ty but also of the nation. the labour congresses make known the view-points of their members on national affairs through the presentation of briefs to government. in addition, representatives of unions as well as of management organizations now serve on many governmental boards and commi ttees (emphasis added). ,c by 1947, every province in canada, except saskatchewan, had, in effect, adopted p.c. 1003 as standard labour policy. variations between provinces as to its implementation were due to differences in constitutional interpretation and on the relation of class forces, that is, large versus small capital, the strength of the independent commodity producer and working class militancy. conflict continued but the implementation of p.c. 1003 virtually across canada meant that organized labour's role moved away from finhting for recognition at the national level towards consolidating these gains at the provincial level. in general, the arena within which industrial conflict would be concentrated in the post world war ii period would be in those provinces whose political machinery had the strongest support coming from local businessmen and independent farmers. 130 trade unions and the state in all, then, the role of the canadian state is a complicated picture because the two principal levels of the state, the federal and the provincial, acted in contradictory ways. the federal level was clearly in the vanguard of the political incorporation of trade unions while the provincial state apparatus had to be dragged. finally, a theory of the state and trade unions must also include an analysis of the key responses and initiatives of the working class. in dealing with process of political incorporation of trade unions in canada, we had to assume the oppositional influence of class conflict that so dramatically surfaced at such historical moments as the winnipeg general strike (1919), oshawa (1937), windsor (1945), asbestos (1949), to mention just a few examples. on the basis of the above overview, then, it appears to be too simple to see the state in capitalist societies as acting only in one direction or manner at every historical point in time. a theory of the state and trade unions must be expanded to incorporate different levels of the state apparatus and an analysis of class fractions within society which ally themselves to these different levels. in other words, the explanation for the uneven or incomplete process of incorporation of trade unions within civil society must include an analysis of the effectiveness with which the local businessmen and independent commodity producers are capable of politically implementing their ends in the face of a growing industrial working class. in our opinion, such an approach was not forthcoming from the sociological tradition but can be seen to derive from the marxist theories. 131 footnotes 1. 'secular* in terms of working class politics refers to instrumental attitudes, that is, the sober calculation of material advantages. see r.t. mackenzie and a. silver, angels in marble (london ,1969) . 2. there are of course partial exception to functionalist). for example, clark kerr has argued that "aggressive industrial conflict cannot be eliminated and can only be temporarily suppressed". he grounds his thesis on four assumptions; "labour-management conflict flows inevitably from the unsatiated desires of men, the relationship of managers and managed, the need to adapt to changed conditions in one fashion or another and the drive for institutional separateness". his mixture of hedonist philosophy and liberal pluralism does not contradict the conservative thrust of his conclusion: "but conflict may be destructive as well as constructive, and thus it needs to be guided if the social fabric is to be protected and serious injury to individuals and groups avoided" (1954: 230,231,234). 3. see the "debate with marx's ghost" in irving zeitlin, ideology and the development of sociological theory (new jersey, 1968) . 4. for further elaboration on trade union officials' powe r "over" versus "for" members, see hyman (1975) chapter three. 5. the labour gazette , september 1950, p. 1346. 6. for an alternate explanation see eric hobsbawm's "the machine breakers" in l abouring men (london, 1964). 7. c. b. williams, "development of relations between canadian and american national trade union centers 1886-1925", industrial relations (quebec ), vol. 20, no. 2, 1965. 8. there is some evidence that the same samuel gompers was quite acceptable to business interests. in a 1901 address to the national civic federation he had proclaimed "a community of interests .. between the organization of the wage earners and the organization of the employers" (cited from howard and scott in teeple, 1972: 69). 9. the labour gczette , september 1950, p. 1347. 10. international labour org anization , studies and reports, series a., no. 34, conciliation and arbitration in industrial disputes, geneva, 1933. 11. h.a. logan, "the state and collective bargaining", cjeps, 1944, vol. 10, p. 482. "(up to 1943) the canadian acts, however, provided no special machinery for enforcing their provisions, a most serious ommission." h.a. logan and m.j. inman, op. ci t . , p. 596. 12. the labour gazette, ibid . , pp. 1342, 1344, 1345. 13. ibid . , p. 1369. 14. while we have emphasized the legislative aspect of industrial relations in this sketch, a more thorough investigation would also note the role of state coercion i.e., use of the police and judiciary. 15. the labour gazette , op. cit., p. 1372. 16. see i. abel la (ed.) on s trike: six key labour struggles in canada 1919-1949 (toronto, 1974). 132 abel la, irving 1974 on strike: six key labor struggles in canada 1919-1949 . toronto: james lewis 5 samuel. armstrong, c. and h.v. nelles 1973 "private property in peril: ontario businessmen and the federal system, 1898-1911" in g. porter and r. cliff (eds) enterprise and national development . toronto: hakkert. bendix, r. 19s6 work and authority in industry . new york: harper 5 row. crispo, john 1967 international unionism: a study in canadian-american relations . toronto: mcgraw-hill. dunlop, j.t. 1958 industrial relations systems . new york: holt. hobsbawm, eric 1964 labouring men: studies in the history of labour . london: weidenfeld and nicolson. howard, roger and jack scott 1972 "international unions and the ideology of class collaboration" in g. teeple (ed.) capitalism and the national question in canada. toronto: u. of t. press. hyman, richard 1971 marxism and the sociology of trade unionism . london: pluto. 1975 industrial relations . london: macmillan. international labour organization 1933 conciliation and arbitration in industrial disputes . studies and reports, series a., no. 34, geneva. ingham, g. 1974 strikes and industrial conflict . london: macmillan. jamieson, stuart 1973 industrial relations in canada . toronto: macmillan. kerr, clark 1954 "industrial conflict and its mediation", american journal of sociology , vol. 60, pp. 230-245. labour , dept . of 1950 labour gazette . ottawa. lenin, v.i. 1967 "what is to be done?", selected works, volume i . moscow: progress . logan, h.a. 1944 "the state and collective bargaining", canadi an journal of economics and political science , vol. 10, pp. 476-488. mackenzie, r.t. and a. silver 1969 • angels in marble . london. 133 macpherson, c.b. 1953 mann, michael 1973 nay lor, tom 1975 nelles, h.v. 1974 trotsky, leon 1975 ware, n.j. 1937 weinstein, james 1968 williams, c.b. 1965 young, walter 1969 zeitlin, irving 1968 democracy in alberta: social credit and the party system . toronto: university of toronto press. consciousness and action among the western working class. london: macmillan. the history of canadian business 1867-1914 . toronto: james lorimer. the politics of development . toronto: macmillan. leon trotsky on the trade unions . new york: pathfinder. "the history of labour interactions", in n.j. ware and h.a. logan, labour in canadian-american relations . toronto: ryerson. corporate ideal in the liberal state, 1900-1918 . boston: beacon. "development of relations between canadian and american national trade union centers 1886-1925" in i ndustrial relations (quebec) , vol. 20, no. 2. anatomy of a party . toronto: university of toronto press. ideology and the development of sociological theory. new jersey: prentice-hall. 134 neoliberalism and the state | 85 neoliberalism and the state martijn konings1 introduction many political economists have tended to view the global financial crisis as a turning-point, leading us out of neoliberalism and into a more regulated form of capitalism (gamble, 2009; altvater, 2009; wade, 2008).2 the fact that even financial elites felt that insufficient regulatory constraints might have been a factor in the making of the crisis was taken as indicating the demise of free-market dogmas. further confirmation of this diagnosis came in the form of the massive public interventions in the wake of the crisis, which ran counter to all the core tenets of neoliberalism. such arguments often follow the logic of a polanyian conceptual framework, according to which market expansion will generate contradictions that trigger a double movement whereby society organizes to re-impose its values on the market’s commodification logic. in polanyian metaphors, after several decades of market ‘disembedding’ we are potentially witnessing a new phase of regulatory‘re-embedding’. by now, this optimism has been tempered somewhat: it has become clear that the public interventions in the wake of the crisis represent some of the most inegalitarian uses to which state power has ever been put–that is to say, that massive amounts of public funds have shielded financial elites from experiencing the consequences of bad bets while ordinary people are suffering the full effects of the crisis, including unprecedented rates of eviction and unemployment. yet what persists is the notion that the crisis and the governmental responses it triggered 1  martijn konings is lecturer in political economy at the university of sydney (sydney, australia) and has published widely on american and global finance. his current research interests relate to the changing ways in which households are connected to financial institutions, shifts in pension funds’ investment strategies since the onset of the subprime crisis, and the need for political economy to enrich its understanding of core economic categories by drawing on perspectives in social psychology and psychoanalysis. he recently edited the great credit crash and american empire and the political economy of global finance (with leo panitch). he can be reached at: martijn.konings@sydney.edu.au 2  this article incorporates material previously published in neoliberalism and the american state, critical sociology, 36 (5), 741-765. 86 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times represent a progressive moment: according to this reasoning, some form of regulated capitalism is not just imperative from an ethical point of view, but it is a practical necessity, as the self-regulating market will sweep away the very conditions of social and political order. this article argues that such assessments of the current situation are based on a misappraisal of the past three decades, and it will elaborate this argument with reference to the us case. its central claim is that neoliberalism was a return to classical liberalism only on an ideological level; neoliberal practices were never about institutional retreat or the subordination of public and private actors to the discipline of disembedded markets, but precisely involved the creation, legitimation and consolidation of new institutional capacities and mechanisms of control. to view the neoliberal era through the lens of institutionalization is to say that it has been a process whereby financial forms penetrated more deeply into the everyday life of ordinary americans, financial innovation assumed a certain systemic coherence and functionality, and regulators created new policy channels that gave them more grip on financial expansion. this had little to do with the generalized subordination of private and public actors to market imperatives but rather involved a contraction of the room to maneuver available to the bulk of the population that found its counterpart in the growth of the state’s capacities and the increased leverage commanded by financial elites. in the construction of these new relations, the idea of a return to a pre-keynesian free market has played a crucial role, but it is the task of the critical social scientist to show how practices diverge from (even if they are also profoundly shaped by) people’s ideas about them. the idea that neoliberalism has enhanced political control represents a counter-intuitive conceptualization, but this article suggests that that is the case precisely because neoliberal ideology has such a hold on our common sense and intuitions. in order to uncover the nature of neoliberal practices we need to shift to a conceptual register not shaped by neoliberal free-market discourse–to a framework that allows us to see what such practices affect and do rather than say and project. this means that, in order to uncover precisely those dimensions of power that neoliberal discourse obscures, we need to broaden our conception of political authority and learn to operate with more capacious concepts of statehood and state power. attempts to counter the hegemony of neoliberalism often rely too much on a narrow conception of public authority that, by seeking to reassert the salience of the official state vis-à-vis the neoliberalism and the state | 87 market, tend to remain within the conceptual parameters set up by neoliberal thought. this article first develops an alternative conceptualization of the state-market relationship and then discusses how this allows us to make sense of key aspects of the neoliberal era. neoliberalism and infrastructural power we may usefully draw here on mann’s (1984) conception of ‘infrastructural’ power: whereas ‘despotic’ power refers to fairly direct authority over a specific set of actors that is backed up by the threat of coercion, infrastructural power denotes a capacity to implement political projects through social life–that is, an ability to employ institutionalized networks of connections among social actors for the transmission of authority. infrastructural power is more indirect and diffuse and confers more control over the systemic properties of social interaction. it is crucially dependent on the kind of hegemonic socialization that secures active cooperation from social actors. such legitimacy is constructed through institutions that present us with formal, idealized accounts of the operation of our social relations. that norms and institutions should not reveal everything about social life is essential to the emergence of stable mechanisms of social control: their full exposure would entail continuous questioning and so prevent them from becoming entrenched in the routines of everyday life. at the same time, however, the complexity and opacity at the heart of modern power means that its operation is often highly unclear to its participants, making it difficult to wield even for those who are positioned favourably in its networks. in other words, actors may exercise power without being aware of it or without knowing how to wield it most effectively. the capacities that modern power builds are contradictory and fragile, precisely because they require the navigation and manipulation of indirect social relations. although dominant actors like financial elites and policymakers are likely to have more systemic oversight than subordinate actors, their actions are refracted by institutional mediations in ways that they cannot always control or fully foresee. these considerations suggest a particular angle from which to view the dynamics of the neoliberal era. from this perspective, the fact that the modern american state’s capacity to manage economic life and secure financial stability is regularly under threat should not be seen primarily as evidence for the idea (prevalent especially in (ipe) international political economy) that capitalism tends to destroy its institutional preconditions and that neoliberalism has given free rein to this tendency. the interpre88 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times tation proposed here relies on the idea that, instead, the tensions faced by and running through the neoliberal state are the very process through which the state’s modalities of control evolve, reflective of the difficulties involved in managing more intricately interwoven social relations. from a historical perspective the unprecedented infrastructural capacity of the modern american state’s institutional complex to steer and regulate social processes is much more remarkable than the fact that, like all relationships of political control, it is characterized by myriad problems, contradictions and unintended consequences. the infrastructural power wielded by the modern american state is without historical precedent, and so is the intensity of the contradictions that it must negotiate. infrastructural power cannot be easily conceptualized using the categories of political economy. while ipe has not only tried to bring the state and regulatory institutions back in but also tried to distance itself from a ‘state vs. markets’ perspective, its emphasis on the fluidity of the distinction between these spheres has not yet generated the conceptual instruments to understand the role of the neoliberal state in a qualitatively different way. despite the attention to the state and its institutions, financial globalization is still conceptualized as the ‘disembedding’ of financial markets from their erstwhile ‘embedded liberal’ institutional environment and the resulting imposition of market discipline on public and private actors (e.g. helleiner, 1994; best, 2003; ruggie, 2007). to suggest that the lingering influence of a ‘state vs. markets’ perspective is apparent in the continued reliance on polanyian metaphors of ‘embeddedness’ and ‘disembedding’ might seem to be inconsistent with the fact that many scholars use the work of polanyi precisely in order to conceptualize markets as institutional structures. polanyi’s (1957) central argument was that markets are institutional constructions and that the periodically recurring tendencies of markets to disembed themselves from their institutional context would give rise to a counter-movement through which social forces would emerge seeking to re-embed and re-regulate the market. but, as gemici’s (2008) analysis of polanyi’s writings demonstrates, the way the problematic is framed–i.e. the tendency of markets to escape their institutional environment and the possibilities for re-embedding–suggests that a preor extra-institutional logic is at work. that is, insofar as the role of institutions is primarily conceptualized in terms of their ability to regulate and embed markets, the expansionary logic of markets is not itself seen as an institutional construction. rather, it features as a pre-social mechanism that will emerge and expand whenever it is not neoliberalism and the state | 89 actively prevented from doing so. this point echoes recent critiques of the notion of embeddedness as a metaphor to theorize the locus of markets and exchange in social life, which argue that it allows for the persistence of an economistic understanding of the market as a sphere governed by actors’ natural, pre-social propensities and not structured and produced through the norms, conventions and rules provided by institutions (krippner 2002, beckert 2003, jones 2008). we need to move beyond an account of neoliberalism that is consistent with its self-description, i.e., as the subordination of governmental authority and public purpose to the disciplinary pressures of disembedding markets. this argument needs to be differentiated from other perspectives that emphasize the continued salience of institutions in the era of financial globalization and neoliberalism. one of the central theoretical points of critical ipe has been the role of the state in fostering the globalization of financial markets. moreover, it is widely recognized that neoliberal policies do not involve a literal retreat of the state from society and that deregulation is always re-regulation (i.e. that ‘freer markets’ mean ‘more rules’, in vogel’s (1996) terms). however, such interpretations tend to generate conceptual problems characteristic of a polanyian understanding of markets, which stresses on the one hand their many institutional preconditions and on the other their periodically surfacing tendency to escape from that environment and to reverse the direction of causality as their own logic comes to prevail over the control that can be exercised through institutional structures. that is to say, even if it is acknowledged that markets are always dependent on institutional supports, neoliberalism still tends to be considered in terms of the declining capacities of states vis-à-vis disembedded financial markets, the diminished control of political authority over the financial system. the argument made here is different–it is that neoliberalism has involved a process of institutional reconfiguration that adjusted some of the key parameters of the existing financial regime in a way that enhanced rather than diminished the infrastructural capacities of the american state, as well as multiplied the strategic leeway available to those who enjoy privileged access to the state’s mechanisms of infrastructural control (panitch and gindin, 2005). neoliberalism did not represent a return to a purer form of capitalism more in line with the prescriptions of classical liberalism, i.e., ‘an attempt once again to disembed the market from society’ and as such ‘merely the latest iteration of polanyi’s double movement’ (blyth 2002: 4). rather, it connected the state’s formal institutions in more functional ways to the networks of 90 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times governance and control that had evolved at the level of financial intermediation and everyday life, thereby improving the state’s ability to manage those dynamics. the understanding of market expansion implicit in the political economy literature contrasts in an interesting way with the way such processes have been conceptualized in other fields. in recent years, authors working in the field of ‘cultural economy’ have attempted to go beyond the residual economism of ipe to conceptualize financial expansion not as a dynamic of disembedding that destroys social bonds and cohesion, but precisely as a process through which new social forms and relations are created, whereby hitherto uncharted aspects of human life become incorporated into the webs of disciplinary social power and subsumed under the organizational forms of modernity (e.g. aitken, 2005; langley, 2008). the argument in this article bears some similarities to these foucauldian approaches. but it prefers the theoretical lens of ‘infrastructural power’ over concepts such as ‘governmentality’ or ‘disciplinary power’ because it permits us to foreground two key dimensions of contemporary capitalism that have generally not received sufficient attention in the cultural economy literature: the role of the state and the inequality embedded in the operation of power. foucauldian perspectives have tended to assume that the proliferation of governance mechanisms in social life has meant an attenuation of the centrality of the formal state, but this tends to reproduce the image of neoliberal capitalism as a movement of ‘disembedding’. second, such approaches have tended to conceptualize the discursive structures of market governance as a somewhat anonymous nebuleuse that exerts its disciplinary effects evenly across the social field. the market may now be considered as a network of social relations, but these have become so web-like and anonymous that it still does not allow us to think of discipline as an asymmetrical relationship of control. the argument advanced in this article is built on the notion that discipline does not affect social actors in uniform ways, but consists of institutional mechanisms through which some actors build and leverage their agency and expand their strategic options at the expense of the room for manoeuvre and capacities available to others. re-interpreting the neoliberal era in order to fully understand the configuration of social forces out of which the neoliberal era emerged, we need to begin with a schematic look at the nature of the preceding era (from the new deal to the 1970s), which saw the emergence of modern mechanisms of infrastructural neoliberalism and the state | 91 power. the development of this order during the post-wwii period was characterized by contradictions that motivated new strategies and policies that would consolidate and extend the mechanisms of infrastructural power during the neoliberal era. ipe usually understands the post-new deal era as a polanyian mix of markets and state intervention. however, the concept of ‘embedded liberalism’, which suggests a balance of governmental institutions and market forces, doesn’t give us much conceptual grip on that period. far from being contained or suppressed, the post-new deal american financial system underwent a dynamic of vigorous expansion. the point of many new deal reforms had been not to reduce, but precisely to promote, the integration of the american middle and working class into the financial system. this was evident above all in public sanction and support for the use of securitization techniques in order to increase the supply of popular (especially consumer and mortgage) credit. finance was seen not as a force of social fragmentation but as a cluster of institutions that could be used as a means of social integration (calder 1999). the new deal had thus created institutional foundations for the deeper penetration of financial forms into the fabric of american life. and such financial expansion was seen not as increasing but undermining public control: policymaking in the post-new deal era reflected an emerging awareness of the mechanisms of infrastructural control, of the potentially symbiotic relationship between public authority and economic expansion. this was allied to growing awareness of the fact that the proliferation of economic connections produced network characteristics and systemic properties that allowed for more effective institutional steering and manipulation (mitchell 2005)–expressed in the prominence of keynesian economics. for a range of complex (and mostly familiar) reasons, this order came under pressure during the 1960s and 1970s. in this context, the demand for consumer and mortgage credit accelerated in a way that the existing financial system was not designed to accommodate. in order to respond to this demand, banks initiated a huge wave of innovation, dramatically expanding their securitization options. this had contradictory effects: it promoted the state’s institutional capacities in one respect but complicated them in another. on the one hand, the expansion of popular credit compensated for the growing gap between wages and economic aspirations, integrated americans into the discipline of indebtedness and repayment and in this way was crucial in blunting the political edge of social discontent and fortifying the logic of capitalist socialization. on 92 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times the other hand, innovative financial constructions created tremendous regulatory problems: policymakers did not have the instruments to stabilize this pattern of financial expansion (degen 1987). while finance was increasingly important as a means of social integration, the fact that this function was insufficiently supported by the existing institutional regime was visible in high levels of inflation. it is in this context that the emergence of a neoliberal regime should be situated. one of the key moments here was the federal reserve’s turn to monetarism. monetarism is often described as a return to more traditional, pre-keynesian financial policies, but this is a misleading portrayal. pre-new deal financial authorities simply did not have the kind of policy levers that might have permitted them to manipulate financial markets in such a comprehensive way. it had taken the developments of the intervening decades to produce the financial connectivity that permitted such policy leverage. monetarism was a policy to address problems that proceeded on the basis of institutional capacities built up over the previous decades. the standard view of neoliberalism in terms of the subordination of policy and politics to the discipline of the market fails to capture either its origins or effects: the turn to monetarism was initiated by policymakers within the state who sought not to abandon but precisely to increase regulatory control; and it had the effect of enhancing regulatory control over financial markets. monetarist policies involved putting strict limits on the amount of federal funds that banks could access, resulting in higher interest rates. this did not, however, suppress the creation of money and credit. rather, it triggered a new wave of innovation and liquidity creation. banks benefited from the increased price of credit without suffering the downside of restricted quantity (greider, 1987, p. 139-40). capital markets activity surged and financial markets began to function as a kind of vortex, sucking in economic activity. monetarism therefore did not stamp out inflationary pressures but rather re-directed them: inflation was concentrated in the financial sector and so transformed from a generalized problem into a dynamic beneficial to financial capital. the flipside of this development was the recession in the manufacturing sector, which, in combination with the social policies of the reagan administration, had a devastating impact on the income of the lower strata of the american population, pushing these groups to borrow against unfavourable rates and often to borrow more in order to be able to repay their loans and interest charges. everyday life and high finance, main street and wall street, became connected in a highly asymneoliberalism and the state | 93 metrical relationship. in other words, what neoliberalism meant was not across-the-board market discipline but a redistribution of discipline and constraints: it gave financial capital much more leeway, and the other side of this was the intensification of economic discipline on the lower strata of the american population. this redistribution of financial discipline was highly functional from the systemic perspective with which policymakers were concerned: the inflation of asset prices was much more manageable than the consumerprice inflation of the 1970s. so the monetarist shock reconfigured the financial regime in such a way as to eliminate its most serious institutional contradictions and to bolster the infrastructural capacities of the us state. debt-based socialization could now proceed without creating the kind of regulatory contradictions that had marked the 1970s. this did not mean that active financial management had become unnecessary, but that the american state had created sufficient policy room for itself that it could deal with the contradictions of financial markets in more constructive ways. increased public capacities were evident in the treasury’s ability to sell massive amounts of public debt in expanding financial markets, allowing it to finance large budget deficits with relative ease. these public financing capacities would become crucial in the american state’s management of the crises of the 1980s (like the debt crisis and the savings and loan crisis (s&l)), as it permitted the treasury to bail outs firms that were considered ‘too big to fail’. and such interventions created expectations for the way in which financial authorities were likely to respond to the threat of large financial intermediaries failing in the future, i.e., it created a regime of implicit bailout guarantees (de cecco, n.d.). ‘too-big-to-fail’ policies involve a socialization of risk that is inherently asymmetrical in nature, since access to its benefits is conditional on the degree of market power that actors already enjoy. the interests that can count on public backing are those that have already become leveraged to such an extent that, if they were to collapse, would bring entire segments of economic life down with them. since the onset of the subprime crisis, ‘too-big-to-fail’ policies have been portrayed as a very recent development and a departure from the hegemony of neoliberalism, as a kind of pathological ‘moral hazard’. however, public bailouts have been a consistent feature of us financial policy since the early 1980s, and it is crucial to see that the state’s willingness to selectively socialize risk has never just been a moral problem: the ability of financial elites to externalize the risks associ94 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times ated with their strategies has been a consistent driving force behind financial innovation and to the market expansion from which the us state benefited so much. much of the neoliberal period can be understood in terms of a publicly sanctioned and promoted unfolding of a highly symbiotic relationship between financial innovation and elites’ market power on the one hand and social trends like growing inequality and stagnant wages on the other. in the wake of the s&l crisis, regulators and banks cooperated to expand the techniques and instruments for securitization (macdonald, 1996, p. 298), and the clinton administration’s social policies were heavily based on improving access to financial services. the government-sponsored enterprises fannie mae and freddie mac increased their investments in mortgages for lower-income borrowers, and other financial institutions were given incentives to do the same. the availability of securitization techniques interacted with neoliberal social trends and policies to produce a massive expansion of asset-backed debt (montgomerie 2007, dymski 2007). while the integration of lowerincome groups into the formal financial system was widely portrayed as promoting financial inclusion, intermediaries increasingly treated lowincome households as a ‘captured market’ (montgomerie, 2007, p. 21). the nineties saw the steady expansion of an elaborate web of financial relations based on the mutually reinforcing further penetration of financial relations into everyday life and the accelerating gyrations of the wholesale capital markets. during this time ‘too-big-to-fail’ functioned as a background regime that, owing to the decade’s relatively stable growth, did not have to be invoked very often. the infrastructural aspects of us state power were more immediately obvious in the very significant policy leverage that the federal reserve developed. not entirely unlike an economist who can alter the parameters of a model on the basis of an understanding of its systemic properties, the fed could set some of the institutional parameters of a system of highly liquid financial markets. due to the growth of market depth and the consequent improvement in market arbitrage, the price of federal funds was now almost instantly transmitted across highly integrated financial markets, allowing the fed an unprecedented degree of control over market interest rates (krippner, 2007; phillips, 1996). to be sure, the fed’s regulatory authority remained dependent on the networks of institutional linkages through which it had been constituted. its policy autonomy was specifically a capacity to manage and stabilize financial expansion; it was not in a position to control the total quantity of money and credit created in the financial neoliberalism and the state | 95 markets. even if federal reserve chairman greenspan’s expression of concern regarding ‘irrational exuberance’ threw the markets off-kilter for a few weeks, this lamentation was itself testimony to the fact that the fed was not in a position to reduce their dynamism on a structural basis (parenteau, 2005). this logic of financial expansion and governance survived the dotcom meltdown of the first years of the century largely intact. owing to the fed’s liquidity-infusions, the effects of the stock market meltdown, while spectacular, were prevented from spilling over into the wider financial system and triggering a system-wide credit crunch. banks quickly embarked on a new set of profitable strategies, with securitized mortgage and consumer debt the driving forces behind financial growth (blackburn, 2008, p. 81). lending practices took on increasingly predatory qualities. many mortgage lenders found their way into poor neighbourhoods that in the past they had ‘redlined’, that is, designated as areas ineligible for loans. the incorporation of new actors into the forms and relations of american finance produced contradictions that were more serious than financial authorities had imagined possible. as banks and brokers adopted lending strategies that in earlier times had been the preserve of loan sharks, they went well beyond enlisting subordinate actors into hegemonic patterns of control. instead, by tightening the financial screws to the point of overstrain, they undermined their ability to function as competent social actors with access to the requisite set of capacities. many poor americans were less creditworthy than lenders and creditrating agencies had hoped. and so it was that, in the summer of 2007, it became clear that many americans had for some time been unable to service the debts they had taken on. because much of this ‘bad debt’ was hidden in larger pools of asset-backed securities, uncertainty spread and markets froze. over the course of the following year, the gravity of the situation became fully apparent. when the federal reserve’s attempts to restore confidence proved ineffective and several wall street giants teetered on the brink, authorities quickly signalled their willingness to extend financial guarantees. as it became clear that selectively rescuing firms was not going to hold the american financial system together, ‘too-big-to-fail’ policies assumed entirely new dimensions, beginning with the troubled asset relief program. over the past years the us state has extended major public guarantees to financial institutions. this has reinforced the structural salience of the ‘too-big-to-fail’ logic: since post-crisis legisla96 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times tion has not in any meaningful way changed the configuration of incentives facing american financial institutions, they will still be able to take on risks that will have to be socialized when they go sour. the question is how this continued redistribution of financial pressure will be managed and what kind of responses it will provoke. conclusion the us state’s recent crisis management efforts have been highly nonneoliberal in spirit. however, we should exercise considerable caution when depicting the highly visible role of the state in the present situation as a break with a preceding neoliberal era. for, as this essay has argued, neoliberal practices have never been very neoliberal in spirit. if we see the disjunction between neoliberal theory and practice as a constitutive aspect of the construction of power relations and political capacities over the past three decades, then the recent deployment of political capacities appears less as the breakdown than as the provisional culmination of the neoliberal era and its distinctive practices. like all episodes of intense strategic manoeuvring, these strategies generate contradictions and will be affected by a range of unforeseen consequences and unacknowledged interdependencies. yet they are not without foundation, as they operate on the basis of capacities rooted in the institutional construction of the american financial system. if, as a result of the severity of the crisis, the discrepancy between theory and practice has now become so flagrant that it has actually undermined the credibility of neoliberal free market myths, we should bear in mind that that myth has only ever been the tip of the iceberg of neoliberal patterns of power. we are not just dealing with neoliberal policies and ideas but with a much wider infrastructure of power that involves organically rooted norms, institutions and actor capacities (cahill 2009). a conventional perspective that aims to re-assert the state against financial markets is profoundly inconsistent with developments of the past years. the current strategies of the american government, far from representing a classic instance of direct state intervention or a return to keynesianism, are profoundly imbricated with and reliant on the financial institutions and connections that have proliferated throughout social life during the neoliberal era. the sheer degree of infrastructural control that is involved in the bailout packages goes well beyond the kind of intervention mechanisms that were available to keynesian welfare state planners during the post-wwii period. the state’s tentacles have been neoliberalism and the state | 97 wrapped around the heart of economic life, and it is now wielding these to reconfigure the institutional parameters of financial growth and in such a way as to restore systemic properties that allow for stable expansion. the progressive potential of this will be slim, unless we can muster the political agency to effect such change. references aitken, r. (2005) ‘a direct personal stake’: cultural economy, mass investment and the new york stock exchange. review of international political economy 12 (2): 334-363. altvater eltmar, 2009. ‘‘postneoliberalism or postcapitalism? the failure of neoliberalism in the financial market crisis’’, development dialogue, 51. beckert, j. (2003) economic action and embeddedness: how shall we conceptualize economic action? journal of economic issues 37 (3): 769-787. best, j. (2003) from the top down: the new financial architecture and the re-embedding of global finance. new political economy 8 (3): 363-384. blackburn, r. (2008) the subprime crisis. new left review 50: 63-106. blyth, m. (2002) great transformations: economic ideas and political change in the twentieth century. cambridge: cambridge university press. cahill, d. (2009) ‘the end of neoliberalism?’, zcommunications, http:// www.zcommunications.org/the-end-of-neoliberalism-by-damien-cahill calder, l. (1999) financing the american dream . a cultural history of consumer credit. princeton: princeton university press. de cecco, m. (n.d.) the lender of last resort. cidei working paper no. 49. degen, r. a. (1987) the american monetary system . a concise survey of its evolution since 1896. massachutts/toronto: d.c. heath and company/ lexington. dymski, g.a. (2007) from financial exploitation to global banking instability: two overlooked roots of the subprime crisis. url (consulted on 17 july 2009): http://www.soas.ac.uk/economics/events/ crisis/43938.pdf. gamble andrew (2009) the spectre at the feast . capitalist crisis and the politics of recession. new york: palgrave. gemici, k. (2008) karl polanyi and the antinomies of embeddedness. socio-economic review 6 (1): 5-33. greider,w. (1987) secrets of the temple: how the federal reserve runs the country. new york: simon and schuster. helleiner, e. (1994) states and the reemergence of global finance . from bretton woods to the 1990s. ithaca, ny: cornell university press. 98 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times jones, a. (2008) beyond embeddedness: economic practices and the invisible dimensions of transnational business activity. progress in human geography 32 (1): 71-88. krippner, g. (2002) the elusive market: embeddedness and the paradigm of economic sociology. theory & society 30 (6): 775-810. krippner, g. (2007) the making of us monetary policy: central bank transparency and the neoliberal dilemma. theory & society 36 (6): 477-513. langley, p. (2008) the everyday life of global finance . saving and borrowing in anglo-america. oxford: oxford university press. macdonald, h. (1996) expanding access to the secondary mortgage markets: the role of central city lending goals. growth & change 27 (summer): 298-312. mann, m. (1984) ‘the autonomous power of the state: its origins, mechanisms and results’, archives europeennes de sociologie, 25 (2). mitchell, t. (2005) economists and the economy in the twentieth century. g. steinmetz (ed.) the politics of method in the human sciences: positivism and its epistemological others, pp.126-141. durham: duke university press. montgomerie, j. (2007) financialization and consumption: an alternative account of rising consumer debt levels in anglo-america. cresc working paper series no. 43, university of manchester. panitch, l. and gindin, s. (2005) finance and american empire. l. panitch and c. leys (eds.) socialist register 2005, pp. 46-81. london: merlin. parenteau, r. (2005) the late 1990s’ us bubble: financialization in the extreme. in g.a. epstein (ed.) financialization and the world economy, pp. 111-148. cheltenham: edward elgar. phillips, s. m. (1996) the place of securitization in the financial system: implications for banking and monetary policy. l. t. kendall and m. j. fishman (eds.) a primer on securitization, pp. 129-138. cambridge, ma/ london: mit press. polanyi, k. (1957) the great transformation. boston: beacon press. ruggie, j.g. (2007) global markets and global governance. the prospects for convergence. s. bernstein and l. pauly (eds.) global liberalism and political order, pp. 23-48. new york: suny press. vogel, s.k. (1996) freer markets, more rules . regulatory reform in advanced industrial countries. ithaca: cornell university press. wade, r. (2008) ‘financial regime change?’, new left review, 53 (september–october). mature marx: the case against an epistemological break by jan mayer "the philosophers have only interpreted the world differently, the point is, to change it" -1 this quotation, taken along with marx's other theses on feuerbach, such as his critique of "contemplative materialism" as stopping at isolated man or human essence conceived of outside the aggregate of social relations and objective activity, sums up his attitude to idealist philosophy in general, as well as his dissatisfaction with feuerbach 's anthropological humanism. his was from the beginning 2 a "revolt against the rule of thoughts. , an attempt to turn hegel on his head" as he stated in his critique of hegel's philosophy of right; that is, to rescue what were valuable insights from idealism and to put these in the context of a materialist philosophy. the left hegelians such as feuerbach thought that merely by reinterpreting the world they would solve the problems of idealist philosophy; marx's intent was not only to criticize philosophy but to criticize and to change the real world. marx's sea thing attack on idealism was prompted by the way in which material existence and social consciousness were treated. in hegel, they were mere epiphenomena, emanations of the progress of the world, or absolute, spirit or mind through various stages of its development to its ultimate state (the thesis-antithesis-synthesis), the "really real" to hegel was not "real individuals, their o activity and the material conditions under which they live , not real flesh and blood men, but an abstraction which existed purely in the transcendental realm of reason. marx's materialist antidote to hegel's idealism was found through political economy.'* it is the purpose of this short essay to examine the ways in which this element is retained and developed throughout marx's career and to argue that despite various more systematic and scientific reworkings, many of the important categories of analysis were retained. there are both continuities and discontinuities between the "early" and the "mature" marx, but no epistemological break, contrary to what has been argued particularly by althusserian structuralists. these lines of development are especially evident in the following items: marx's method, including dialectics; his 135 alternate routes treatment of the conditions underlying alienation; and related to this, the way in which he perceives the structure of capitalist society and works his way from "surface phenomena" such as markets, competition, etc. in the early works, to a mature analysis of the hidden mechanisms underpinning them. there are three important and central components in capital which not only represent an advance over marx's earlier analysis of capitalism but also serve as keys to the continuities at the heart of marx's concerns. these three interconnected concepts are: the relations of production, surplus value, and the commodity. the "relation" may be thought of as a basic unit of reality: it is a unity of contradictory parts, and the notion of "contradiction" and "totality" are joined in marx's use of the dialectical method. the mode of production subsumes two types of conditions: means, or forces, of production, and social relations of production; the relations of production under capital unite two antagonistic social actors, the capitalist and the labourer, who are of necessity in conflict because of their relationship in the creation and appropriation of surplus value. it is through the historical conditions which make this appropriation possible that the worker is exploited and his labour alienated from him as labourpo^er , an abstract commodity which has the unique property of producing values greater than itself which then enter into the exchange process and add to the accumulation of capital, under the control of the capitalist who has rights of disposition over capital and labour. the "commodity" (in the special sense intended by marx) is a unique product of capitalism, combining within itself the unity of use-value and exchange-value, with exchange-value becoming the dominant force in the development of the capitalist mode of production. together, surplus value aid the commodity are keys to understanding the structure of capitalist society, taken in context with the social relations of production. these concepts will be elaborated upon in the course of the ensuing discussion. let us first exanine the concept of alienation as it is used in the early economic and philosophic manuscripts and through this analysis, indicate in what form the concept remains in marx's mature political economy. it may be recalled that marx had objected to feuerbach's analysis of religion as being a projection 136 mature marx and reification of man's reflection of himself in an idealized form, a creation not recognized by its creator. this was for marx too psychological a model and said nothing about the relationship between man and his material conditions which were at the basis of all such idealized productions of which religion (the separation between man and his creation, the creation standing over against him as an alien force) was the exemplar. it is at this point that marx's anthropology or ontology (the nature of man and being), his materialist philosophy and his borrowed categories of political economy converge to produce an explanation of alienation. it is because man is an "active, sensual being" in nature that man necessarily realizes himself and his fellow actors only in and by acting on nature— by producing the means of his subsistence. through this activity man refines his human capacities and produces objects which reflect himself (man thus "makes" himself and, in co-operation with others, makes a human, social world). however, under certain historical conditions, the connection between productive activity and the objects of production are lost, and these objects come to take on a separate, hostile existence: under the conditions of division of labour and private property. those who control the means by which men produce their world control both the men and their products; under capitalism, therefore, the worker becomes separated from these and as a consequence, becomes estranged from his fellow men, from himself, and from his true human nature or "species-being". thus the concept of alienation refers to an objective set of conditions caused by particular material arrangements. they involve a producer, a means and an object of production, and an appropriator of these in a set of property relations. these are the elements which appear in rudimentary form in the early writings of marx. in his mature works, he develops in detail the mechanisms which link appropriation, exploitation and accumulation— and the word alienation, but not the sense of the concept, disappears. marx wrote the manuscripts in 1844, the _german ideology in 1846, and he subsequently repudiated most of what he had written as "unscientific." in 1851 he began more intensive study of ricardo although had not yet developed the full implications of 137 alternate routes surplus value. the notebooks towards a critique of political economy (the grundrisse) were written between 1857 and 1858 and are generally acknowledged as representing a "watershed" between marx's early and mature works. contained within them are the elements which would later appear in capital , and it was at this time that marx realized his previous analysis had dealt only with the appearances, the "surface phenomena" of political economy and the structure of capitalist society. earlier, he had treated labour as any other commodity--now he realized its special nature, and this was linked to the creation of surplus value which now was to become the basis of the theory of capitalist accumulation. the extraction of surplus value under the conditions of capitalist domination becomes the motor of the process in which the world comes to be dominated by impersonal exchange relationships. labourpower , as an abstract general category, and money, become the universal solvents by which all things are reduced to equivalents, made mobile and exchangeable, and make the growing accumulation of capital possible. these conditions, however, presuppose historical developments whereby all personal ties, as in feudalism, have been sundered; persons and things have become freed to enter into a system of exchange relations, and a formally free labour force created to enter into contractual relationships with capital, exchanging labourpower for wage-money. however, this is an unequal exchange ev^n if on the surface it appears equal, since labourpower, the unique commodity, creates wealth which is under the control of capitalists. by causing the worker to labour part of the day for the capitalist and only part of the day for himself, conditions are created in which stored-up value adds to the wealthaccumulating capacity of capital when the circuits of production and circulation are completed. hence, as the worker creates more wealth, he becomes more impoverished relative to it--capital, embodying the creative power alienated from him. stands as an alien power over him which grows with the growth of capital. accumulation becomes an end in itself, and the commodity becomes "fetishized" . it is thus in his analysis of th? turning of labour into the commodity labourpower by its separation from the labourer that 138 mature marx marx's analysis of surplus value relates to his earlier analysis of alienation-the term is now "exploitation." earlier, marx saw the relationship between man and his world as one in which productive activity mediates between the individual and the external world as the means by which he appropriates objects. under capitalism, labour and other elements become "abstractions" (that is, the links are severed). alienation implies the breakdown or sundering of a unity of interconnected elements (as oilman, in his 1971 book alienation, points out). in capital , it is now evident that as activity goes through its metamorphosis into value, to be expressed as money, commodities, etc., these become fetishized and take on a life of their own, expressing in distorted fashion the original relation. man's relationship to his world (which includes other men) is now mediated by the abstractions created under capitalism, just as capitalists and labourers, or buyers and sellers in the marketplace, now relate to one another only indirectly, through the mediation of exchange-value. private property (which marx originally saw as the cause of alienation) is now recognized by him as only one form of value and that more fundamental are the conditions which create surplus value and exchange value. let us now turn to an examination of dialectics, another element in marx's development which exhibits both continuity between early and late works and was also from the very beginning, entirely different from hegel's idealistphilosophy use of it. marx's dialectics is both historical-materialist and treats contradictions differently—he does not merely "turn hegel upside down" by converting idealism to materialism. in his early usage, marx corrected hegel by making history "march on its feet" instead of in the airy realm of pure reason; his principal concern was with the contradiction between bourgeoisie and proletariat and the way in which modes of production develop historically through the conflictual supercession of previous forms and social relations. in the mature works, marx adds to this the notion of contradiction within capital itself, as between productive forces (as they develop through the socialization of accumulation and production in large-scale units), and the private ownership of those forces, that is, as godelier p.its it, between two structures, production and ownership. 139 alternate routes dialectics did not originate with hegel but in greek usage, the combined "dia" and "logos" meaning "to reason by splitting in two", of phenomena which are split, their elements in clashing opposition . from the beginning, there was implied in the notion of dialectics a world in flux, moving, changing and transforming into its opposite. the world is conceived of as a unity of opposites in contradiction with one another, even if at any particular "moment" appearances seem static and in harmony. this conception was adopted both by hegel and by marx. however, marx rejected hegel's progress of an "independent objective mind" and posited instead the movement of history through human subjects actively creating and changing their world. there is no ultimate reality which transcends passive humans and proceeds in mechanical and subjectless fashion; rather, to marx, contradictions and conflicts which move history are within and between human actors and structural elements which they have created but which nevertheless condition and limit them at any one point. this unity in contradiction which is material reality also has production as its basis, grasped via the categories not of philosophy but of political economy. components are related together internally in a totality, a set of circumstances which are the products of historical processes and which determine at any point the conceptual status of elements within that totality. it is for these reasons that the starting point of the scientific method in marxian political economy must be fundamentally different from that of idealist philosophy. as nicolaus comments: "unlike hegel's logic, and unlike marx's own initial attempts earlier, th~is beginning begins not with a pure, indeterminate, eternal and universal abstraction, but rather with a compound, determinate, delimited and concrete whole..." ("foreword" to the 1973 pelican grundrisse ; and see "the method of political economy", marx, grundrisse ) a significant example in the mature marx's work of the particular and "delimited" concrete entity is the commodity as central to understanding what is unique and crucial about the mechanisms of capitalist society. it makes possible the analysis of value which contains within it the unity of two contradictory elements, usevalue and exchangevalue, with the latter dominating, just as there is in capitalist society as a whole a "unity in domination" of 140 mature marx capital and labour, bourgeoisie and proletariat. beginning the analysis with a particular concrete entity such as the commodity, illustrates that the unity of production and consumption is not direct and immediate, but is part of a process linked to other conditions, as nicolaus points out. in other words, we are not concerned with the universal qualities of production and consumption as they would be useful in analysing any and all societies, but rather, with historically specific ones, those under conditions which create and sustain capitalist society. the commodity represents the essence of the uniqueness of the historical product, capitalism, because it contains within it all of the other contradictions of the capitalist mode of production. as marx proceeded with his detailed study of political economy in the grundrisse notebooks, nicolaus (1973) observes, his methodological approach changed: one must not work up from simple, general, abstract relations to complex particular wholes, but from the particular to the general, an essential difference between idealist and materialist dialectics. this has implications for the role of "abstraction" as a methodological procedure. as keat and urry (1975) point out, marx was not a positivist—he wished to lay bare the internal structure of the capitalist mode of production and society, hidden workings which are related together internally and not readily observable in appearances or isolated "social facts": his was a "realist" conception. social reality could therefore be understood only by examining both parts and whole, both concrete facts and abstract categories, by a process of moving back and forth between them in order to reach closer and closer approximations to the nature of this reality in its historical specificity. the process of abstraction involves a reduction of pheno.nena to their "pure form" in order to grasp how particular processes are worked out and interrelated (and to separate out residues of previous forms which have not yet been superceded). thus, for example, the significance of the spinning jenny cannot be understood unless we know the context in which it is located in the relations of production; similarly, labour takes on a particular meaning because of the social relations in which it is embedded: the subordination of labour to capital and the domination of the commodity form of value. 141 alternate routes the contention made by such theorists as althusser that there was a break between the early "ideological" and "philosophical" marx and the mature "scientific" marx is, therefore, misleading, as well as incorrect. marx was throughout his career both a materialist philosophically and an empiricist scientifically (and it could be added, an "enlightenment child" who did not see the problems with scientificity that concern us today). the early marx was interested in uncovering the false or reified nature of notions by relating them to the material conditions of existence; the mature marx with examining the hidden mechanisms of capitalism. at both points in his development, he was therefore interested in what was in the world of appearance not readily apparent but hidden and examinable only through scientific categories. philosophy (as a bourgeois activity) was for marx unscientific; the nature of reality, society and history had to be examined scientifically--it could be said, then, that as he developed he merely became more scientific, more systematic. although he recognized individuals as the creators of their social world and history, at no point did he ever begin from purposive action of individual actors. he did not begin, that is, from presuppositions of a psychologistic utilitarianism, but began, rather. from the structured unity in which actions were to be understood. unlike functionalism, however, this unity was one of inherent contradictions, and it is this point which links the notions of "dialectics" and "totality." thus, marx's theoretical and methodological approaches separate him from both idealism and utilitarianism on the one hand, and also from positivistic social science and functionalism on the other. to sum up, there are a number of continuities (despite differences in terminology and focus) which link the ^arly and mature marx, despite some discontinuities which may legitimately be considered of a developmental kind: 1) society is the product of struggle between man and nature and between groups of men, with material conditions (economic organization, means of subsistence) as the focal point of this struggle. 2) since "man makes himself" through his activities, knowledge of society must be concerned both with action and with objective 142 mature marx conditions in which actions occur; they are not merely epiphenomenal of a hidden "ultimate reality." 3) society is a structure of interrelated parts in which social processes containing contradictory elements generate conflicts — society and history are therefore to be analysed in dynamic and dialectical terms in the context of specific objective conditions. 4) "false consciousness," "alienation", or "reification" are processes which contribute to masking the true nature of social relations, products and society from their creators and arise because of those social relations and products in particular societal contexts. philosophy, religion, and the "fc-tishism of commodities" are examples of masked and misunderstood processes. 143 51 can global capitalism be saved? “exit strategies” for capitalism or humanity minqi li1 abstract: global capitalism is currently recovering from the great recession of 2009. but the basic contradiction of neoliberalism has not been resolved. the fiscal deficits in the western countries and china’s real estate bubble are setting up the world for a potentially more devastating crisis. china may emerge as the key battleground of global class struggle. as the global ecological system approaches total collapse, any further expansion of capitalism is now in fundamental conflict with the long-term survival of humanity. keywords: global capitalism, crisis, class struggle, global ecological crisis introduction in 2009, global capitalism suffered the deepest economic crisis since the great depression. in previous crises, such as in the early 1980s, early 1990s, 1998, and 2001, the global economy had managed to grow, though at comparatively slower rates. in 2009, according to the international monetary fund (imf), the global economy as a whole contracted in absolute terms for the first time since the second world war (see figure 1). in response to the crisis, leading capitalist governments have thrown trillions of dollars to bail out the financial markets and kept the economies afloat through massive increases in fiscal deficits. since then, the global economy seems to have recovered. the imf now predicts the global economy to grow by 4.6 percent in 2010 (imf 2010). has global capitalism been saved, after all? the question may be addressed at three different levels. first, there is no doubt that capitalism has survived the most recent economic crisis. however is the world 1 assistant professor, department of economics, university of utah, salt lake city, utah, usa. he is the author of the rise of china and the demise of the capitalist world economy (pluto press and monthly review press, 2009). can global capitalism be saved? “exit strategies” for capitalism or humanity 52 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research back to some form of “normal conditions”? capitalism is basically an economic system based on the pursuit of profit and capital accumulation. saving capitalism, in this sense, has to do with securing the conditions that favor high profit rates and rapid capital accumulation (economic growth). will these “normal conditions” required for capitalist expansion be reestablished in the foreseeable future? second, there is the long-term, world historical question whether capitalism as an economic and social system can be saved in the long run. what historical conditions are required for capitalism to remain a “savable” system? under what historical conditions may capitalism cease to exist as a historically viable system? third, if it turns out that capitalism is no longer historically viable, in that case, what might be the “exit strategies” that are available for humanity? the following pages attempt to shed some light on each of these questions. -0.01 0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 figure 1. world economic growth (annual growth rate of world gdp, 1951-2009) annual growth rate sources: maddison (2003); world bank (2010); and imf (2010). profit and accumulation capitalist profit derives from the exploitation of workers’ surplus labor. from this point of view, maximum profit requires maximum exploitation of labor. however, other things being equal, maximum exploitation is always beneficial for individual capitalists; it is not necessarily in the interest of the entire capitalist class however. excessive exploitation reduces workers’ purchasing power. under certain conditions, it could also reduce the overall “effective demand” in the capitalist econ53 omy, thus lowering the total profits for capitalists. successful capitalist accumulation requires an effective (though temporary) solution to this contradiction. this may be illustrated by the following formula: w + π + t = c + i + g + nx this equation shows that in a capitalist economy, the sum of wages (w), profits (π), and taxes (t) must equal the sum of consumption (c), investment (i), government purchases (g), and net exports (nx), that is exports less imports, or net purchases by foreigners. in other words, total incomes must equal total expenditures. rearrange terms and one arrives at the following profit determination formula: π = i + (c-w) + (g-t) + nx this equation illustrates that capitalist profits may increase if there is a rise in capitalist investment, or household consumption in excess of wages (which roughly corresponds to “household deficit”), government deficit or trade surplus.2 from the point of view of a national capitalist economy, the most ideal solution would be to keep wages and taxes low, while keeping profits high through large trade surpluses. however, this obviously cannot work for all national capitalist economies as some economies’ surpluses have to be matched by other economies’ deficits and, for the global capitalist economy as a whole, imports and exports by definition should cancel out. for the global capitalist economy or any national capitalist economy that has a trade account that is in rough balance, the “optimal” solution would appear to be keeping wages and taxes low, while solving the “effective demand” problem (also known as the “realization” problem) through high investment. this would maximize the rate of capital accumulation. however, capitalists would make large investments only when they expect high rates of return (the profit rate). but excessively high investment could lead to excess production capacity and higher production costs, leading to lower profit rates. finally, there are the “second best” options such as household deficits or government deficits. the problem with these less than ideal solutions is that they will inevitably lead to unsustainable household or public debt, likely ending with devastating financial crises. how has capitalism historically managed to maneuver between these different temporary “solutions”? figure 2 presents the historical trajectory of the profit rate in the us economy, a crucial indicator that represents the degree of “health” of a capitalist economy.3 2 this profit rate determination formula was first developed by polish marxist economist michael kalecki and later adopted by hyman minsky (minsky 2008[1986]: 160-169). 3 the profit rate is defined as the ratio of the broadly defined profit (including corporate profits, interests, and rent) over the can global capitalism be saved? “exit strategies” for capitalism or humanity 54 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research the great depression marked the bankruptcy of free market capitalism and demonstrated that modern capitalism could not function without substantial government intervention. after the second world war, capitalism underwent major institutional restructuring. government spending now accounted for a substantial portion of the national economic output and keynesian policies helped to stabilize the capitalist economy. several factors contributed to comparatively high profit rates in the 1950s and 1960s. u.s. corporations benefited from monopoly over world industry in the early postwar years. on the other hand, in western europe and japan, a large rural surplus labor force kept pressure on wages, thereby keeping labor costs low. all advanced capitalist countries benefited from cheap energy and raw materials imported from the periphery (the “third world”). however, by the mid-1960s all of these favourable factors started to fade. competition between the us, japan and western europe in the world market intensified. after decades of economic expansion, strengthened by welfare state institutions, western working classes enjoyed a period of rising bargaining power and wages started to grow rapidly. finally, given the triumph of a good many national liberation movements, and politically strengthened by “cold war” geopolitics, peripheral states started to demand more favourable terms in the world division of labor.4 the collapse of the profit rate led to the crisis of the 1970s and early 1980s. in response, the global capitalist classes undertook a counter-offensive in the form of neoliberalism which in effect amounted in a strategy to revive the global profit rate through global redistribution of income and wealth from labor to capital. “globalization” was a key component of neoliberalism, which had to do with opening up the markets and resources of several large peripheral or former socialist states. the massive increase in the global reserve army of cheap labour turned the global balance of power decisively in the favour of the capitalist class. as is presented in figure 2, neoliberalism did succeed in reviving the profit rate. but by lowering the global wages, neoliberalism necessarily depressed the global mass of consumption. the neoliberal global economy was thus confronted with a serious problem of insufficient global effective demand. in this context, many capitalist economies (china, japan, other asian economies, and germany) attempted to promote capital accumulation through expansion of exports (that is, net stock of private nonresidential fixed assets. ideally, if the purpose is to study the overall performance of global capitalist economies, one would like to examine the evidence of the global average profit rate. but reliable data on the subject is not available. given the leading position of the us in the global economy, one may think about the us profit rate as representative of the profit rate in the global capitalist economy. the profit rate trajectories of other advanced capitalist economies have been similar to that of the us in the postwar era and until recently the overall performance of the global capitalist economy had been largely determined by the performance of the advanced capitalist economies. for an attempt to study the “world profit rate”, see li, xiao, and zhu (2007). 4 for detailed discussions on the rise and fall of the postwar capitalist “social structure of accumulation,” see gordon, weisskopf, and bowles (1987). 55 through rising nx). however, as mentioned earlier, this meant that some economies would have to run trade surpluses, while others ran trade deficits. since the 1990s, the us economy has consistently run large trade deficits, absorbing much of the overproduction from the rest of the world. within the us economy, demand expansion has relied mostly upon debt-financed consumption (that is, through rising c-w). the situation was already unsustainable by the early 2000s. but the us federal reserve attempted to prolong the expansion by fueling a massive housing bubble, paving the way for the 2008-2009 economic crisis.5 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 figure 2. e profit rate (us economy, 1929-2008) profit rate source: bea (2010). “exit strategies” for capitalism? to save global capitalism, all major capitalist governments have responded with massive increases in fiscal deficits. in terms of the profit determination formula discussed above, this amounts to an effort to substitute (g-t) for (c-w) to sustain capitalist profits. the problem is that such a strategy will simply substitute fiscal crises for private debt crises. according to the bank of international settlements, by 2011 the general government debt to gdp ratio is expected to approach 100 percent in france, portugal and the united kingdom; 130 percent in greece and italy; and exceed 200 percent in japan (cecchetti, mohanti, and zampolli 2010). in fact, several southern european countries (greece, spain, portugal, and italy) are 5 for detailed discussions on the structural contradictions of neoliberalism, see crotty (2000) and li (2009). can global capitalism be saved? “exit strategies” for capitalism or humanity 56 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research now threatened with imminent fiscal bankruptcy. in a few years, major capitalist countries such as the us and uk may have to confront an explosive fiscal crisis. the current dilemma for western capitalism, then, is the following. if western capitalist governments respond to the fiscal crisis by imposing massive fiscal austerity programs (through cutting social spending and increasing taxes on the working classes), it would dramatically reduce global effective demand. this would, at best, result in a period of prolonged stagnation throughout the advanced capitalist world and, at worst, trigger a collapse of the global economy. on the other hand, if western governments fail to address the fiscal crisis in accordance with the dictates of financial markets, financial capitalists may respond with massive sales of government bonds, leading to surging interest rates and economic collapses. in this context, the so-called “emerging markets” (such as china, india, russia, eastern europe and latin america and especially china), have emerged as a major pillar of global economic growth. figure 3 presents the share of world gdp of the world’s major economies. in 2008, the us, eurozone and japan combined accounted for 42 percent of the world’s total gdp (and us accounted for 20 percent). the socalled “bric” countries (brazil, russia, india, and china) combined accounted for 22 percent of world gdp (and china accounted for 11 percent). can china sustain global economic growth in spite of western stagnation? 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 figure 3. share of world gdp (selected economies, 1980-2008) us euro area japan china india brazil russia source: world bank (2010). 57 figure 4 presents china’s changing macroeconomic structure. household consumption as a share of china’s gdp declined from about 50 percent in the 1980s to about 35 percent by 2008 (by comparison, in the us household consumption accounts for about 70 percent of gdp). the relative decline of consumption reflects the fact that chinese working class incomes have fallen behind the growth of gdp. according to the official chinese general federation of labor survey, labour income as a share of china’s gdp declined from 57 percent in 1983 to 37 percent in 2005. further, according to the survey, in an economy with double-digit growth, about a quarter of the labour force has not seen any wage growth over the past five years. about 75 percent of workers believe the current income distribution in china is “unjust” and about 60 percent of workers believe excessively low labour income represents the greatest social injustice (xin jing bao 2010). on the other hand, capital formation (investment) as a share of china’s gdp increased from 35 percent in 2000 to 44 percent in 2008, and net exports as a share of china’s gdp increased from 2 percent in 2001 to 8 percent in 2008. from 2001 to 2008, china’s total merchandise exports (not subtracting imports) increased from 20 percent of gdp to 33 percent of gdp. thus, before the recent crisis, china’s economic growth was led primarily by investment and exports. -0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 figure 4. china's macroeconomic structure (share of gdp, 1980-2008) household consumption government consumption capital formation source: state statistical bureau (2009). can global capitalism be saved? “exit strategies” for capitalism or humanity 58 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research during 2009, in the midst of global economic crisis, chinese exports decelerated sharply. total merchandise exports fell by 16 percent from 2008. china’s trade surplus fell from $196 billion in 2008 to $102 billion in 2009, falling by 48 percent. investment emerged as china’s only remaining engine of economic growth. from 2008 to 2009, china’s total fixed investments increased from 17.3 trillion yuan to 22.5 trillion yuan (or an increase of 5.2 trillion yuan). china’s nominal gdp increased from 31.4 trillion yuan to 33.5 trillion yuan (or an increase of 2.1 trillion yuan). increase in total fixed investments thus accounted for 240 percent of china’s economic growth in 2009 (that is, the increase in fixed investments more than offset declines in consumption and net exports to have sustained economic growth) (state statistical bureau 2010a). in early 2010, china’s economic growth continued to be led by investment. over the first four months of 2010, total urban fixed investments increased by 26 percent from the same period in 2009 (about twice as fast as overall economic growth). however, excessively high investment has by now built up enormous excess capacity in productive sectors. unable to profit from productive investment any more, chinese capitalists are shifting a growing proportion of capital into property and financial speculation. over the first four months of 2010, about 21 percent of the fixed investments went to real estate development, which increased by 36 percent from the same period in 2009 (state statistical bureau 2010b). andy xie, the former chief asian economist of morgan stanley, recently commented that china could face major economic and political instabilities in a few years. it is likely that china will face rising labour, raw materials and environmental costs in the coming years. also, china’s share in the world export market may shrink against the background of western economic stagnation. as a result, capital accumulation in the productive industries is no longer profitable. in this context, chinese capitalists and local governments have relied upon real estate development to prolong the economic boom. china is in effect following the same path as japan, korea, and southeast asian economies once did. these asian economies relied upon property bubbles to sustain economic growth after the export boom ended. xie (2010) has argued that in a few years, china’s property bubble will likely burst, leaving china with a stagnant economy and threatening china’s political stability. the basic contradiction of the neoliberal global economy is that under neoliberalism, working class incomes and purchasing power tends to be depressed and liberalized capital flows tend to generate financial instability, discouraging productive investment and government social spending. global effective demand thus tends to be depressed. many national capitalist economies attempt to overcome this contradiction by promoting export-led growth. but for much of the world to pursue export-led growth, there will have to be economies that are willing to run large 59 trade deficits. in the deficit countries, either the private sector or the government has to run large deficits, leading to rising private or public debts over time. sooner or later, the deficit countries will be hit by financial crises as rising debts become unsustainable. during the current “recovery”, this basic contradiction has not in any way been resolved. on the contrary, fiscal deficits in western countries and china’s real estate bubble are setting up the world for a potentially more devastating crisis. how will the evolving global capitalist crisis affect the conditions of global class struggle? this is the basic political question confronting global working classes. what has happened to the grave diggers of capitalism? in the communist manifesto, marx and engels famously predicted that capitalist development would inevitably lead to the growth of the proletarianized working class and prepare the necessary conditions for the working class to organize economically and politically. as the organized working classes grow in size and strength, they argued, eventually they will prove themselves the grave diggers of capitalism (marx and engels 1978). nearly one and a half centuries after the communist manifesto, what has happened? the late 19th and early 20th century saw the rapid growth of working class movements and socialist political parties throughout europe. however, as western working class movements gained strength politically, their stake in the existing capitalist system has also increased. reformist tendencies (known as “revisionism”) gradually became dominant within the european socialist parties (the “second international” parties). after the second world war, european socialist parties officially abandoned revolutionary objectives and committed themselves to incremental reforms within the capitalist system. the russian bolshevik party was the only major party within the “second international” that remained committed to the revolutionary overthrow of capitalism. during the first world war, lenin attempted to analyze and understand the phenomenon of “revisionism”. lenin argued that in the “imperialist” era, western capitalism benefited from “super profits” exploited from the colonies and semicolonies. the western capitalists would then use a portion of the super profits to buy off the working class leaders, or the “labor aristocracies”. lenin argued that the colonial super profits constituted the material basis of revisionism (lenin, 1916). after the second world war, a growing marxist literature followed the leninist tradition and further argued that because of “unequal exchanges” and the operations of the “capitalist world system”, western capitalist wealth had been largely based on the exploitation of the peripheries. the so-called “technological revolutions” had basically been different ways to create world market monopolies that would allow a few “core” capitalist states to extract surplus value from the rest of the world (emmanuel, 1972; amin, 1974; wallerstein, 1979). can global capitalism be saved? “exit strategies” for capitalism or humanity 60 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research however, neither the super profits nor the unequal exchanges had succeeded in maintaining permanent social peace in the west. through long-term economic and political struggles, the western working classes had been able to secure important concessions from the capitalist classes, winning a growing range of economic, social, and political rights. by the 1960s, these working class gains had begun to put pressure on capitalist profits, threatening to undermine the basic conditions of capitalist accumulation. neoliberalism was the global capitalist response to this crisis. neoliberalism is a significant world historical development. it clearly demonstrates that global capitalism has developed to such a point that it is no longer possible for capitalism to simultaneously meet the basic requirements of capital accumulation while accommodating the historically determined demands of the working classes in the core capitalist states. in other words, the second international reformism (or the social contract) that had secured basic social peace within western capitalism since the mid-20th century has run into irreconcilable contradictions and is therefore historically bankrupt. another major development in the neoliberal era has to do with the changing balance of global economic forces. the relocation of global capital to exploit cheap labour forces in the “emerging markets” has been a major component of the neoliberal project. however this has led to the large formations of working classes in the “semi-periphery” (the geographical zone in the capitalist world system that has a position, in terms of the world division of labour and political strength, between the core and the periphery). over time, the semi-periphery working classes will demand economic, social and political rights comparable to those enjoyed by the western working classes. this development, once it happens, will presumably dismantle the global system of unequal exchange (which has been based on the super exploitation of the peripheral working classes) and therefore destroy the material foundation of western labor aristocracies. the current intensification of class struggles, such as in europe, could thus mark the beginning of a new historical era. it is no longer possible for european capitalism to accommodate both the historically established “social contracts” (most importantly pensions and health care commitments) and the requirements of capital accumulation. this contradiction has manifested itself in the form of fiscal crises throughout europe. the european capitalist classes are now attempting to impose the entire burden of adjustment onto the working classes in order to reestablish favourable conditions for capital accumulation by creating a new regime of cheap labour. the current struggle is therefore a life-and-death question for both the capitalist classes and the working classes. for the working classes, they will have to either fight back or eventually accept the loss of the historic gains made since the 19th century. indeed, it is quite possible that the european working classes might 61 lose the impending battle. the basic problem is that after a century of dominance of social democratic reformism, currently no effective revolutionary political force is playing a significant role in european working class politics. as a result, the european working classes have politically failed to break free from the historical limitations of capitalism, in the process coming to terms with capital. if the capitalist classes succeed in depriving the european workers of their historic gains, their “victory” could yet prove to be no more than a pyrrhic one. if the capitalist classes manage to impose massive declines of living standards onto the european working classes, this would dramatically reduce the european-wide effective demand and, in turn, reduce the export demand for “emerging market” economies. the decline of global effective demand could then lead to a global depression. as such, the economic crisis could then evolve into a general social and political crisis. under the second possible scenario, some effective revolutionary political forces may emerge in europe in the next few years, breaking the current political stalemate. under this scenario, the european working classes would undertake effective, unified struggles to make a decisive break with the existing capitalist order, moving towards the general socialization of the basic means of production and democratization of state power (in other words, establishing the “dictatorship of the proletariat”). the new socialist powers would then redirect the economy towards meeting peoples’ basic needs and ecological sustainability. if such a scenario does unfold, europe could emerge as the center of the 21st century global socialist revolution. the most likely scenario, though, is for europe to repeat the pattern that has been established in the neoliberal era. the european working classes would wave off defensive struggles against capitalist attacks. as a result, the european working classes would suffer from some declines in living standards but manage to maintain most of their historic gains. the setbacks for the working classes, however, would prove to be inadequate to revive the european capitalism which would sink into an increasingly deeper accumulation crisis. in other words a slow motion, but increasingly deeper, vicious circle. from a global perspective, under such a scenario, the european working classes would play an important role in weakening but not defeating global capitalism. the decisive battleground of global class struggle will then likely take place in other parts of the world. it is the global semi-periphery (china, india, russia, and latin america) that could prove to be the focus of global capitalist contradictions. over the past two or three decades, capitalist development in the semi-periphery has depended upon (to different degrees) super exploitation of a cheap domestic labour force, intensive exploitation of material resources and the environment, based on exports to western markets. these factors are no longer possible. in the coming years, the semi-peripheral capitalist economies will probably encounter shrinking can global capitalism be saved? “exit strategies” for capitalism or humanity 62 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research western markets, rising tides of working class struggle, resource depletion and an increasingly devastating environmental crisis. the combination of these contradictions may lead to the breakdown of the semi-peripheral capitalist regimes and potentially a general revolutionary crisis. the surge of revolutionary struggles in the semi-periphery could decisively change the dynamics of global class struggle. china: the key battleground of global class struggle? within the semi-periphery, china may emerge as the key battleground. china is already the world’s second largest economy and under the current trend will replace the u.s. to become the world’s largest economy within a decade. in the neoliberal era, china has become the centre of global industrial production, playing a central role in the global division of labor. china has become one of the major markets of energy and raw materials for latin america, the middle east, russia, and africa. china is the main importer of capital goods from germany, japan and south korea. china is also the leading supplier of low and medium-valued manufactured goods to the world market, especially to the u.s. market. in a way, then, the entire global capitalist market now works around china. likewise, china is also at the very centre of global ecological contradictions. chinese capitalist development has caused enormous devastation to china’s own environment and china has overtaken the u.s. to become the world’s largest energy consumer and greenhouse gas emitter. as china now accounts for fully one quarter of the world’s total carbon dioxide emissions, it is virtually impossible to resolve the global climate change crisis without china being committed to large absolute emission reductions. how did china turn from a revolutionary socialist state in the 1960s and 1970s into a major pillar of global capitalism today? in short, after the counter-revolutionary coup in 1976 (when radical maoist leaders were arrested), the emerging bureaucratic capitalist class took over and consolidated political power. in the 1980s, the state sector working class continued to enjoy many socialist rights and remained strong at the factory level. instead of organizing a direct, frontal attack on the working class that would be politically costly and might not succeed, the chinese bureaucratic capitalist class adopted—in line with mao’s revolutionary approach—a strategy of surrounding the cities with the countryside. china’s “economic reform” started with the privatization of agriculture. with the dismantling of the collective peoples’ communes, hundreds of millions of “surplus workers” in the rural areas were made available for capitalist exploitation. foreign and domestic capitalist enterprises grew explosively, profiting from china’s cheap labor force, low taxes and lack of social and environmental regulations. by the 1990s, the capitalist sector has overtaken the state sector to become the dominant economic force. the chinese government was ready to push for massive privatization in the cities. tens 63 of millions of state workers were laid off. those who were employed were deprived of any remaining socialist protections. however, the very success of chinese capitalism may have prepared the conditions for its eventual downfall. first of all, the state sector working class (including the laid off state sector workers) has developed political experience in both the socialist period and the capitalist period. this rich historical experience has contributed to a dramatic increase in class consciousness and organizational capacity among china’s state sector workers. in recent years, the state sector workers have organized many anti-privatization struggles and many are led by activists influenced by marxist-leninist-maoist ideas.6 by contrast, the migrant working class (the workers who have their origin in the countryside and work in the new capitalist sector) remains politically inexperienced. in recent years, however, migrant workers have also developed the consciousness to demand more economic and social rights (not yet political rights or socialism). as chinese capitalist accumulation continues to deplete rural surpluses of labour and a new generation of migrants increasingly considers themselves as “workers” rather than “peasants”, the objective balance of class power could increasingly shift in favour of the working class, encouraging migrant workers to get organized and fight for economic and social rights. in addition, under capitalist development, many among the petty bourgeoisie (or the urban “middle class”) have also suffered from declining living standards. many cannot afford to buy an apartment in the city. several college graduates cannot find jobs and have to live in slum-like conditions. the proletarianization of the petty bourgeoisie has contributed to the rise of the intellectual left in china. a growing number of young people have turned into marxist-leninist-maoists. the future of china depends on whether political unity can be developed between state sector workers, migrant workers and the proletarianized petty bourgeoisie. if such a unity does take shape, it may become a political force that the chinese capitalist class cannot defeat. is it conceivable that the chinese capitalist class could undertake certain social reforms to accommodate rising class tensions and redirect chinese capitalism onto a more “sustainable” path? over the past few years, the hu jintao-wen jiabao administration has been discussing building a so-called “harmonious society” with less inequality. in reality, despite some minor policy adjustments, economic and social inequality has continued to widen. for several reasons, meaningful social reform is unlikely to be achieved. first, much of the chinese capitalist wealth has its origin in the theft of state and collective assets from the socialist era. the entire ruling class is thoroughly corrupt and, at the local level, political power increasingly rests upon cooperation 6 on the class consciousness and anti-privatization struggle of the state sector workers, see weil (2010). can global capitalism be saved? “exit strategies” for capitalism or humanity 64 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research with local mafias. in this context, the central government has little ability to discipline the ruling class. even if the central government cares about the long-term sustainability of capitalism, it does not have the ability or will to force any significant capitalist group to make major concessions. second, despite the rapid growth of the chinese economy, china has failed to make inroads into the truly high value added segments of global commodity chains. china now relies upon foreign capital for almost all key technological areas in industry. without access to the monopolistic profits associated with the high value added activities, chinese capitalism will have to rely upon cheap labour forces to maintain its global “competitive advantage”. in the future, as the chinese working class gets organized and demands a growing range of rights, chinese capitalism may no longer be able to maintain social stability without in some way undermining capitalist accumulation.7 third, and potentially the most important, both chinese capitalist accumulation and global capitalist accumulation have rested upon the relentless exploitation of the environment. as the global ecological system approaches total collapse, any further expansion of capitalism is now in fundamental conflict with the long-term survival of the humanity. global catastrophes or “exit strategies” for humanity? in socialism: utopian and scientific, engels summarized the basic contradiction of capitalism as one between objective socialization of production and the capitalist system of private appropriation. this contradiction had led to increasingly more violent crises, demonstrating the inherent conflict between capitalist relations of production and the objective development of social productive forces. such a contradiction could only be resolved through the establishment of a more democratic and egalitarian form of social relations of production, based on social ownership of the means of production and rational economic planning. in other words, socialism (engels, 1978 [1880]). for classical marxists, socialism would prove to be a superior social system by developing social productive forces more rationally than capitalism. however, the greatest challenge confronting humanity today is no longer economic crisis but the fact that after centuries of relentless capital accumulation the global ecological system is now on the verge of complete collapse. consider the following aspects of the global ecological crisis (climate action tracker 2010; speth 2010; wild 2010): • according to the “climate action tracker,” the climate actions pledged by a good many national governments will commit the world to a warming of 3 7 on how china has failed to rise to the technology frontier, see hart-landsberg (2010). 65 degrees celsius by the end of the 21st century, steering the world onto a path of unprecedented catastrophes. • according to the united nations, by 2025 about 1.8 billion people will be living in countries with absolute water scarcity and about two-thirds of the world population could be under conditions of water stress. • the world is currently losing soil 10 to 20 times faster than it is being replenished, threatening the very foundation of world agriculture. • a recent foreign policy article argued that the world could face peak phosphorus production in the near future. phosphorus is a key input in the production of fertilizers. the authors warned that “if we fail to meet this challenge, humanity faces a malthusian trap of widespread famine on a scale that we have not yet experienced.” • about half the world’s wetlands and a third of the mangroves are gone. an estimated 90 percent of large predatory fish are gone, and 75 percent of marine fisheries are now over-fished or fished to capacity. • twenty percent of ocean corals are gone and another 20 percent are severely threatened. half the world’s temperate and tropical forests no loner exist. species are disappearing at rates about 1,000 times faster than normal. how may the rapidly developing global ecological crisis be dealt with? apologists claim that capitalism may be made “sustainable” or “green” by promoting “green technologies” or “eco-efficiency”. this argument may be illustrated by the following “ipat” formula: i = p * a * t the formula suggests that environmental impacts (t) are determined by population (p), “affluence” (a, that is, gdp per capita), and technology (t, which measures the environmental impact per unit of gdp). according to basic laws of ecology, ecological sustainability requires stable or falling environmental impacts. according to the ipat formula, unlimited economic growth (that is, capital accumulation) can be made compatible with ecological sustainability if technological progress leads to increasingly higher eco-efficiency, that is, falling t, which presumably falls more rapidly than the growth of gdp. the fundamental problem with the “green capitalist” argument is that it fails to understand, on the one hand, why uncan global capitalism be saved? “exit strategies” for capitalism or humanity 66 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research der capitalism there has been a powerful tendency towards endless accumulation of capital and, on the other hand, the insurmountable physical and political-economic limitations of “eco-efficiency” as a countervailing factor. all human civilizations have been based on the existence of a substantial surplus product (the part of total social product that is above the population’s basic consumption and the means of production required to maintain society’s simple reproduction). in pre-capitalist societies, the surplus product was used by ruling elites primarily for luxury consumption and various wasteful activities (such as war, religious rituals, or grand imperial projects), leaving little for the expansion of production. modern capitalism is unique in that it is the only socio-economic system that has ever existed in human history where market relations have become dominant in every aspect of social life. the dominance of market relations leads to universal and unending competition between producers, forcing every producer to use a substantial portion of the surplus-value (profit) to engage in capital accumulation and expand the scale of production. this dynamic, once it is dominant, becomes a self-sustaining economic force reproducing itself on increasingly larger scales. in the world market, world-wide competition forces all national states to pursue as much economic growth as possible. those nations that fail to compete often suffer economic and political crises or are defeated militarily. against this powerful tendency towards unlimited capital accumulation (represented by increasingly larger p and a), what has been the counteracting force? green capitalist advocates argue that market functions generate the most efficient economic system. for such a view, resource scarcity through rising prices will stimulate innovation leading to resource-saving technologies that can lower t and offset the growth of p and a. this argument, however, was found to be flawed as early as the 19th century by british economist william stanley jevons. jevons argued that any resource-saving technology, by temporarily reducing the consumption of a resource, would lead to lower price, which would then encourage people to consume more of the resource. the perverse phenomenon was known as the “jevons paradox”. jevons’ paradox could explain why in reality, despite improvements in resource efficiency (that is, falling resource consumption per unit of economic output), overall resource consumption keeps growing persistently.8 natural resources are, after all, “priced” in a capitalist economy, however flawed the pricing mechanisms might be. by contrast, generations of material waste from human activities or human pollutants are treated as “free” by capitalist markets. in economic terms, the ecological system is treated as an “externality” that is considered to have zero costs 8 for an explanation of jevons’ paradox, see orford (2010). 67 in a free market system. in a capitalist system, government regulations provide the only countervailing mechanism against externalities. however, as environmental regulations tend to increase the costs associated with accumulation, governments will typically only regulate those pollutants that do not significantly affect business profitability. thus, even on national scales, government environmental regulations are often inadequate and ineffective. on a global scale, any national capitalist economy that seriously regulates the environment will increase its own accumulation costs and suffer a competitive disadvantage in the global market. thus, when the question concerns global environmental problems (such as climate change), few capitalist economies are willing to undertake the necessary actions. international agreements are supposed to help solve this dilemma by sharing the costs among national capitalist states. however, major capitalist powers rarely agree upon how the costs should be shared and few want to contemplate any restrictions on their own accumulation. the recent united nations conference fiasco on climate change at copenhagen demonstrates this clearly. in addition to the political-economic limits on “t”, there are also fundamental physical-ecological limits. all human economic activities have to do with either physical or chemical transformations of the natural world, and thus necessarily require the consumption of material resources and lead to the generation of material wastes. it is therefore not possible to invent an economic activity with zero environmental impacts. unlimited economic growth will inevitably lead to unlimited environmental impacts. in the long run, the only way to achieve ecological sustainability is to develop an economy with stable material flows (or a “steady-state” economy) that can meet the world population’s basic needs and are consistent with the normal operations of ecological systems. the capitalist system is taking humanity down the path of global ecological catastrophe, which threatens the destruction of civilization. at this critical threshold of the early 21st century, what will be humanity’s “exit strategy” for survival? under capitalism, society’s surplus product is under the control of many big and small capitalists that engage in ruthless competition against one another. this competition generates an enormous, immensely irrational social force that is beyond any individual capitalist’s control, forcing businesses to pursue ruthless exploitation of both nature and humanity. the only way for humanity to escape this ridiculous trap, an enormous irony of alienation (that the very social force created by human beings is now turned against humanity itself ), is to establish society’s collective and self-conscious control over the social surplus product—that is to say, over the economy and over the makeup of society itself. as classical marxism argued, this control would in turn require social ownership of the means of production and the development of democratic, rational economic planning that determines the can global capitalism be saved? “exit strategies” for capitalism or humanity 68 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research size, composition and use of society’s surplus product. it is often claimed that the critics of capitalism have failed to provide a viable alternative to capitalism. this shortcoming is allegedly a fatal flaw that invalidates any attempt to move beyond capitalism. such a claim, however, despite its vacuousness, only remains valid or legitimate so long as the capitalist system remains a viable historical option. since the continued operation of capitalism is now in fundamental conflict with the survival of the ecosphere and humanity, the terms of debate have been fundamentally transformed. references amin, samir. 1974. accumulation on a world scale: a critique of the theory of underdevelopment. new york and london: monthly review press. bea. us bureau of economic analysis. 2010. national income and product account tables and fixed assets tables. website: http://www.bea.gov. cecchetti, stephen g., m. s. mohanty, and fabrizio sampolli. 2010. “the future of public debt: prospects and implications.” website: http://www.bis.org/publ/work300.pdf. climate action tracker. 2010. “high chance to exceed 3°c despite recent developments.” website: http://www.climateactiontracker.org. crotty, james. 2000. “trading state-led prosperity for market-led stagnation: from the golden age to global neoliberalism.” the political economy research institute of university of massachusetts amherst, published study 7. website: http://www.peri.umass.edu/fileadmin/ pdf/published_study/ps7.pdf. emmanuel, arghiri. 1972. unequal exchange: a study of the imperialism of trade. new york: monthly review press. engels, friedrich. 1978[1880]. “socialism: utopian and scientific,” in robert c. tucker (ed.), the marx-engels reader, pp. 683-717. new york: w. w. norton & company. gordon, david m., thomas weisskopf, and samuel bowles. 2007. “power, accumulation, and crisis: the rise and demise of the postwar social structure of accumulation,” in the union for radical political economics, the imperiled economy, book 1, pp. 43-58. new york: monthly review press. hart-landsberg, martin. 2010. “the chinese reform experience: a critical assessment.” review of radical political economics (forthcoming). imf. international monetary fund. 2010. world economic outlook update, july 2010. website: http://www.imf.org/external/ns/cs.aspx?id=29. 69 lenin, vladimir ilyich. 1916. imperialism, the highest stage of capitalism. website: http://www. marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1916/imp-hsc. li, minqi. 2009. the rise of china and the demise of the capitalist world economy. london: pluto press; new york: monthly review press. li, minqi, feng xiao, and andong zhu. 2007. “long wages, institutional changes, and historical trends: a study of the long-term movement of the profit rate in the capitalist worldeconomy.” journal of world systems research xiii:1: 33-54. maddison, angus. 2003. the world economy: historical statistics. paris: organisation for economic co-operation and development. marx, karl and friedrich engels. 1978[1848]. “manifesto of the communist party,” in robert c. tucker (ed.), the marx-engels reader, pp. 469-500. new york: w. w. norton & company. minsky, hyman p. 2008[1986]. stabilizing an unstable economy. new york: mcgraw-hill. orford, lionel. 2010. “jevons’ law: enforcing the age of energy decline.” website: http://www. energybulletin.net/node/51158. speth, gus. 2010. “towards a new economy and a new politics.” website: http://www.energybulletin.net/node/53202. state statistical bureau, people’s republic of china. 2009. statistical yearbook of china 2009. website: http://www.stats.gov.cn. ____. 2010a. zhonghua renmin gongheguo 2009 nian guomin jingji he shehui fazhan tongji gongbao (statistical communiqué of the people’s republic of china on national economic and social development 2009). website: http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjgb/ndtjgb/qgndtjgb/ t20100225_402622945.htm. ____. 2010b. “4 yuefen guomin jingji zhuyao zhibiao shuju (the main indicators of the national economy in april)”, may 11, 2010. website: http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjfx/jdfx/ t20100511_402641475.htm. wallerstein, immanuel. 1979. the capitalist world-economy. cambridge: cambridge university press. weil, robert. 2010. “a house divided: china after 30 years of ‘reforms’,” in economic and political weekly (ed.), china after 1978, pp. 209-232. hyderabad, india: orient blackswan. wild, matthew. 2010. “peak soil – it is like peak oil, only worse.” website: http://www.energybulletin.net/52788. world bank. 2010. world development indicators online. website: http://data.worldbank.org/datacatalog/world-development-indicators. can global capitalism be saved? “exit strategies” for capitalism or humanity 70 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research xie, andy. 2010. “trapped inside a property bubble,” january 10, 2010. website: http://english. caing.com/2010-01-10/100106991.html. xin jing bao (new beijing daily). 2010a. “laodong baochou zhan gdp bili lianxu 22 nian xiajiang, yi yingxiang shehui wending (labor income share of gdp had fallen for 22 years, threatening social stability)”, may 12, 2010. website: http://finance.eastmoney.com/ news/1346,2010051275119040.html. social property relations in the 21st century | 159 social property relations in the 21st century: an interview with ellen meiksins wood — jordy cummings jordy cummings1 (jc): let’s start with canada. what do you make of the current context of the canadian state? is it exceptionally right wing in comparison with earlier governments, for example, on issues like palestine or the environment? or are current policies continuous with past policy trajectories? ellen meiksins wood2 (emw): i don’t think the two options here are mutually exclusive. yes, this government is distinctively rightwing, not least on matters like palestine and the environment. but, like everything else, it has a history. the simple continuity, of course, is that canada was and remains a capitalist economy, with all this entails: the imperatives of profit-maximization imposed by the capitalist market, the necessity of constant capital accumulation, the constant need to reduce the costs of labour, the subordination of all social goods including ecological sustainability to the requirements of profit, the inequities and social injustices these imperatives inevitably engender, and the limitations placed on states as long as the economy is regulated by capitalist requirements. but let’s be more specific. for 1 jordy cummings is a ph.d. candidate in political science at york university, toronto, canada. he has written for counter punch, the bullet and socialist studies. his main research area is classical marxist political theory and is working on a dissertation examining the significance of the french revolution for the socialist project in light of the rethinking of the concept of bourgeois revolution. 2 ellen meiksins wood, who for many years taught at york university, toronto, canada, is the author of, among other books, the pristine culture of capitalism, the origin of capitalism, democracy against capitalism, empire of capital, and most recently two volumes of a social history of western political thought: citizens to lords and liberty and property. she was an editor of new left review from 1984 to 1993 and co-editor of monthly review from 1997 to 2000. 160 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism instance, inequality in canada today is growing at a faster pace than in most oecd countries, and we have to acknowledge that this isn’t entirely harper’s doing. a previous liberal government in the 1990s did more than its share in bringing about the current conditions: massive cuts in public spending which have made paul martin—who boasted that he had brought public spending back to 1950s standards—a model often cited by the current austerity maniacs. but this doesn’t mean that harper isn’t a particularly malevolent development in canadian history, devoted to reversing as much as he can of what has been best about canada. it hasn’t even been enough for him to undermine the social functions of the state and to do everything he can to create a new culture in canada which treats the state not as an instrument of social responsibility but as the source of our problems. he has also been conducting a lethal attack on civil society and its independent institutions, undermining everything from sources of public information like stats canada to various autonomous human rights and environmental organizations – to say nothing of the ongoing attack on trade union rights. it’s all very well to attack other governments as instruments of capital, but this government is undermining canadian democracy in wholly new ways. jc: the new buzzword is “austerity.” like neoliberalism (and sometimes used in combination), to what extent is austerity the specific manner in which the capitalist state is dealing with the current slowdown of capitalist accumulation? in other words, is there a risk that when we talk too much about austerity or neoliberalism and corporations that we risk softening our critique of capitalism? emw: that’s a good point. we have to be careful that by stressing adjectives like ‘neoliberal’, or for that matter ‘globalized’, in the characterization of capitalism (to say nothing of ‘market capitalism’, as if there were any other kind) we don’t obscure as much as we reveal, at least when we’re trying to explain capitalist crisis or the damage done by capitalism. of course we have to understand the differences among various kinds or phases of capitalism. but we also have to acknowledge the problems endemic to capitalism in all its forms. the imperatives of capital inevitably create periods of crisis. we don’t have to underestimate the importance of, say, neoliberal ideology in creating the mess we’re in today in order to understand that this ideology itself was a response to an already existing problem in the social property relations in the 21st century | 161 profitability especially of us capital. the decline started with the end of the long postwar boom, some time after american capital had been challenged by competition from germany and japan. that economic decline was generated by the systemic mechanisms of capitalism, and neoliberalism, set in motion by reagan and thatcher, was in large measure an ideological response to that decline. this brought with it attacks on the labour movement, extracting huge concessions from workers, the deregulation of markets, and so on. but the ultimate effect wasn’t to correct the problem. on the contrary, it was to make matters worse by reducing aggregate demand, which would be countered by what robert brenner has called ‘assetprice keynesianism’, the stock market bubble, the encouragement of increasing indebtedness, and so on. instead of genuine growth in the ‘real’ economy, there was a kind of ‘bubblenomics’. in other words, this ‘privatized keynesianism’ and the encouragement of private debt by means of reckless financial practices were designed to enhance capitalist profit without social spending, while, of course, reducing taxes for the rich. so the neoliberal ‘solution’, like current austerity programs, was an ideologically driven response to an unavoidable structural problem. i think it would be safe to argue that the solution hasn’t worked, to put it mildly, and it has never worked. there are no doubt insurmountable problems in any growth-stimulating alternative, and we will eventually have to confront the whole difficult question of ‘growth’—how sustainable it is to have an economy driven by a constant need to accumulate capital and maximize profit. but we’d certainly be entitled to say that even an imperfect kind of keynesian demand management would work better even now as a mode of crisis management. at the same time, there’s no use pretending that even the most democratic and humane mode of state intervention could avoid the recurrence of crisis. that leaves us, as ever, with a political conundrum: it’s always tempting to say that, capitalism is capitalism is capitalism, and that since, no matter what we do, capitalism inevitably produces crisis— to say nothing of endemic problems like social injustices and gross inequality—we should maintain our political purity by not settling for imperfect solutions. but the simple truth is that, for most people, imperfect solutions like increased social spending and the raising of taxes on the rich are a far better option than neoliberalism and austerity—which, however driven by big financial interests, don’t even seem to work on their own terms. 162 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism jc: you have always accepted the label “political marxist”, as originally a riposte by guy bois to robert brenner. recently, charlie post claimed a preference for “capital-centric” marxist. in any case, whichever way we label it, what is it about political or capital-centric marxism that so arouses, even to the point of vituperation, such polemical disagreement and criticism? emw: i’ve always had my doubts about that label ‘political marxism’, though i have to take some responsibility for starting it. but i’ve come to accept it, more or less reluctantly, to identify what has become a very fruitful approach to the study of history and social reality. when guy bois accused brenner of this heresy, it was on the grounds that brenner had adopted a voluntarist kind of marxism, which placed too much emphasis on ‘social factors’, in particular class struggle, while neglecting ‘the most operative concept of historical materialism’ (the mode of production) and abandoning ‘the field of economic realities’. in my article on ‘the separation of the economic and the political in capitalism’ i argued that this criticism was based on a false dichotomy, because there was no such thing as a ‘mode of production’ in opposition to ‘social factors’. in fact, marx’s most radical innovation was precisely to define the mode of production and economic laws themselves in terms of ‘social factors’. political marxism’, as i understood it, believed in the importance of material factors and the mode of production just as much as economistic marxism did, and it certainly didn’t involve some kind of voluntarist denial of historical causality. but it took seriously the proposition that production is a social phenomenon. so, the first premise of this approach is that economic relations are social relations, and its primary organizing principle is what bob brenner called ‘social property relations’. one of the main points that follows from this is that each specific system of social property relations has its own dynamics, its own ‘rules for reproduction’, and, of course, this is true of capitalism in particular. the old forms of marxist technological determinism tended to read back into all history capitalism’s laws of motion as if the drive constantly to improve the forces of production by technical means were a universal, transhistorical law. political marxism is far more conscious of the specificities of capitalism, and so it can shed more light on how capitalism operates today, why it does what it does, why its crises take the form that they do, and what the possibilities are for the future – though i’d hesitate to call the approach ‘capital-centric’, if only because of its social property relations in the 21st century | 163 usefulness in identifying the specificity of other social forms too, not just capitalism. the whole point is that it seeks to be a truly historical approach, as distinct, say, from the teleological tendencies of certain kinds of marxism. i’m not really sure why this approach has provoked hostility in certain quarters – though i don’t think this should be exaggerated, given the growing number of impressive scholars it has attracted, and the very fruitful and wide-ranging research agenda it has produced. some of the hostility is probably just the old bad habit of the left, the so-called narcissism of small difference and the kind of sectarianism that tends to be most antagonistic to those outside one’s sect but closest to it. but there’s no denying that our approach to history represents a significant challenge to certain old orthodoxies, not just the old technological determinism but specific notions like ‘bourgeois revolution’, an idea that some people regard as sacrosanct even if it no longer serves any useful purpose, theoretical or political. there has also been another kind of criticism, which simply misunderstands ‘political marxism’ in the most fundamental way. one such criticism responds to my arguments about capitalist social property relations and how they generate the specific market imperatives of profit-maximization, constant capital accumulation, increasing labour-productivity, etc., by claiming that this emphasis on market (‘economic’) imperatives fails to acknowledge the persistence of ‘extra-economic’ coercion in capitalism, in particular in capitalism’s exploitation not only of free wage labour but of unfree labour, and that my analysis of the ‘economic’ as formally separate from the ‘political’ in capitalism makes such an approach incapable of recognizing the political implications of ‘economic’ relations and of dealing with ‘extra-economic’ factors like race or gender. this criticism seems to me completely, and astonishingly, offbase for a whole variety of reasons: because the whole point of my argument about the distinctive relation between the ‘economic’ and the ‘political’ in capitalism is to insist that the ‘economic’ is a social, and indeed a fundamentally political, relation; because i, like others who have adopted this approach, have said quite a bit about capitalism’s exploitation of unfree labour, to say nothing of my writings on the interactions between capitalism and ‘extra-economic’ identities like race and gender; because one of the first premises of political marxism is brenner’s important observation that the market-dependence of economic actors, which creates its characteristic imperatives, long predates the generalization of wage labour and that its original imperatives were not generated by a relation between capital and wage labour; because 164 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism i have elaborated at great length my views on the ‘extra-economic’ power of the state, which, i argue, has always been essential to capitalism and even – in some ways even more – to neoliberal ‘globalized’ capital; and so on and so on. there’s no space to go into this here, so let me just say this: it’s one thing to acknowledge the persistence of ‘extra-economic’ relations and coercion in capitalism; it’s quite another to understand the very specific social property relations that create capitalism’s specific imperatives. if you want to understand the relations between capitalism and, say, race, gender, or slavery, you obviously need to understand what makes capitalism distinct from other social forms, what generates its very specific operating principles and the distinctive historical dynamic that it has set in motion. of course it’s important to recognize the ‘extra-economic’ realities of race, gender, or unfree labour. but to say, for instance, that capitalism continued to exploit slave labour, not just wage labour, gets you nowhere in explaining capitalism and why it operates the way it does, which means you can’t even explain how capitalism interacted with, how it affected and was affected by, slavery itself in ways distinct from other slave societies. i’ve said a few things about this in my own work, but, of course, the specialist on this is charlie post. nor can we explain how race and gender operate in capitalist societies, as distinct from other social forms, without understanding the specific dynamics of capitalism. jc: in relation to criticism of political marxism, at a recent left forum panel, one of post’s critics claimed that political marxism was fundamentally in error, more than anything else, over its rejection of leninist and other “classical” theories of imperialism. speaking personally, one of the things that made the most sense to me when i first read your work was your continuing argument that the early theories of imperialism presupposed a world in which capitalism was not yet universal, yet today for all intents and purposes, capitalism has penetrated social relations everywhere, it has indeed “created a world in its own image”? what kind of theory of imperialism do we now need? emw: i’m not sure who exactly has rejected leninist and other ‘classical’ theories of imperialism, but at any rate, my own argument has always been that those classical theories, as powerful as they were and remain, belong precisely to, and are most illuminating about, the ‘classic’ age of imperialism, in which major colonial powers were engaged in inter-imperialist rivalries to divide and redivide the tersocial property relations in the 21st century | 165 ritories of a largely non-capitalist world. this simply isn’t true today, and i’ve suggested that what we’ve been lacking is a theory of today’s capitalist imperialism, when, among other things, conflicts among capitalist powers take a very different form. i’ve argued in various places that, for all their strengths, neither lenin’s nor luxemburg’s theories were intended to deal with a new historical reality in which the economic imperatives of capitalism have overtaken old forms of colonial domination and inter-imperialist rivalries. i’ve also explained, for instance, why i think lenin’s idea of finance capital and his prediction of its growing dominance, however prophetic they may seem, were dealing with a form of financial dominance quite different from what’s on display today: when, for example, he adopted hilferding’s notion of finance capital, he had in mind the very particular role of german banks in consolidating industrial production into ‘cartels’ and thus, in the process, fusing with industrial capital, not detaching speculation from the ‘real’ economy in the disastrous ways finance capital has been doing, or seeking to do, in our most recent crises. in any case, his ideas don’t, and couldn’t have been intended to, offer an explanation of imperialism in our own time, especially given the ways in which the imperialism of his day was still significantly shaped by noncapitalist relations and forces. if we’re going to cite lenin, the least we have to do is apprehend not only what binds the capitalism of his day to our own but also what differentiates one from the other. and what this means above all is that any theory of imperialism today has to deal with the very specific forms of domination made possible by capitalism, not simply capitalism’s continuing use of ‘extra-economic’ forms of colonial domination but its elaboration and universalization of its own specific forms of purely ‘economic’ coercion, the expansion and manipulation of market dependence and market imperatives, which have really come into their own in barely more than the last half-century. jc: you have written with cautious optimism about the strength of the occupy movement that has developed in the last year. what is it about this movement, its ideas, its rhetoric, that gives you this sense of optimism, in comparison, for example, with the global justice movement of the late 90s? emw: i guess the most heartening thing about the occupy movement is how it has started to change the conversation. one of the things that has always struck me about the earlier movements you mention is how they 166 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism tended to blame global capitalism often less because it was capitalist than because it was global. the principal target of many ‘anti-capitalists’ was less capitalism than ‘globalization’, at least in its present form, and particularly transnational corporations, together with the international organizations like the imf, world bank, wto, and g8 that help to organize the world for global capital. there’s still a lot of that emphasis today, and it certainly has its place. but i think we’re beginning to see more directly anti-capitalist sentiment. i don’t want to exaggerate this shift to a focus on capitalism as capitalism. there’s probably still too much focus on the greed of bankers rather than on the systemic imperatives of capitalism, which compel even the most socially responsible and least personally greedy capitalist to pursue profitmaximization and subordinate social goods like equity or environmental sustainability. but we may now be seeing something different – for instance, in the growing concern about inequality as endemic to the system, or in an increasing recognition of the ways the capitalist market restricts our choices and our individual freedoms. it’s encouraging, too, that at least in some places there are signs of collaboration between occupy groups and the labour movement. and it’s certainly encouraging to see the concerns of the occupy movement expressed in the most mainstream media, who have clearly been compelled to take notice. we’ve yet to see the movement take a truly political form with a capacity for organized action, and i’m not entirely convinced that it’s well suited to producing that kind of effect. but i’d never underestimate the importance of changing the conversation in – eventually – giving rise to something more. one thing that may be encouraging in this respect is that the new movements seem more inclined to see the point of national struggles. the old global justice movement certainly had room for very local struggles, but with its focus on global institutions it seemed to suggest that any truly effective political action would have to occur on the global stage, and this in the end may have proved politically disabling. after all, ‘global’ power is rather hard to target and in the end seems beyond the practical reach of any effective political action, in contrast to national states, which represent more visible, less daunting targets, more susceptible to local struggles and some kind of democratic accountability. it’s not insignificant that globalization theories on the left have tended to emphasize the uselessness of national struggles in globalized capitalism, or even, as in the case of hardt and negri, the absence of any identifiable locus of power at which we can aim some kind of organized counter-power. what we may be seeing now is a different perception of where the targets social property relations in the 21st century | 167 lie. i don’t want to stretch this point too much, but the occupy movement, while certainly aware of globalization and open to international solidarity, may be more inclined to look closer to home, not just to meetings of the g20 but, say, to wall street and washington, not just as symbols but as identifiable centers of power. this applies in various ways to other instances of turbulence you talk about, in the arab spring or the eurozone crisis. i can’t say much with any confidence about the arab spring, given the setbacks we’ve been witnessing, which are likely to continue – except that it’s hard not to be moved by the passionate and courageous demands for freedom and dignity we were hearing at the height of the revolutions, and it’s hard not to believe that they have changed the world for good, in both senses of the word. the crisis in the eurozone may have more immediate implications for the kinds of working class and popular struggles you seem to have in mind. this is a crisis that, like no other in the recent past, has forced a confrontation with the realities of capitalism. the tensions between the purveyors of austerity and their vicitms can’t help but draw the lines more sharply along class lines than we’ve seen, or been willing to see, for a while. but there’s also something else: as, say, the greek state takes on the job of doing the dirty work for german banks, there’s no mistaking the role played by local states as the primary instruments of capital, however ‘global’ – or at least regional – capital may be. it is, after all, national states that have been putting more and more of our lives outside the reach of democratic accountability by subjecting us more and more to market imperatives, by privatizing and commodifying ever more aspects of life. what greater ‘democratic deficit’ is there than the one effected by increasing marketization? and how can this be resisted without directing struggles at the local state? what other struggle is there that can offer greeks – or spaniards or italians – any better hope than a struggle directed at the power concentrated in their own national states? we have to see those struggles as not only a challenge to this or that austerity program but as an effort to restore and expand democracy – and also as a challenge to the long prevailing wisdom that the state has become an irrelevance, not worthy of targetting in struggle. jc: one aspect of the current left conversation is an interest in horizontalism, as it is called, and a skepticism towards engaging with state power. what do you make of the continued resilience of this 168 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism phenomenon? emw: if you’re asking me why many on the left are disinclined to regard the state as a useful target of struggle, or the achievement of state power as a useful objective, i think there are several different kinds of reasons. there are what we might call general structural reasons having to do with the nature of capitalism, which appears to make the state a less relevant player in everday struggles than the daily struggles of the workplace or the tensions between employers and workers. then there are historical reasons, not least the dark record of the state in ‘actually existing socialism’ or the disappointments of social democracy. there’s also something specific to the current generation of young people, which distinguishes them sharply from their parents and grandparents. the generation that went through the great depression and world war ii and lived to see the golden age of welfare state capitalism had a very particular experience of the state as a source of social goods, from housing to health care to universal education. this was particularly true of canada. the next generation, the so-called ‘baby boomers’, may have taken these things for granted, but that’s no longer true of the current generation of young people. they are hard pressed to think of any positive example of state action that has emerged in their own life-time, as their grandparents may have experienced the rise of the health service and other public goods. on the contrary, young people today have witnessed deteriorating public services. long after the decline of postwar capitalism and the end of the postwar boom, they have grown up with both the ideology and the consequences of neoliberalism. i don’t think it’s too much to say that the objective of neoliberalism has been to destroy the state as an instrument of social solidarity and democratic responsibility. it has left the state bereft of both resources and positive objectives, deliberately destroying, in large part simply by means of cuts in funding, much that has been good about state services. so it’s no wonder that this generation finds it hard to think of the state as a positive force in the way that their grandparents did. meanwhile, as i suggested before, we’re constantly inundated by what’s become an almost unchallenged convention: that globalization has rendered the state pretty much irrelevant, a spent force that – for better or worse – can’t keep up with global capital. this kind of thing, which we get from the left no less than the right, has long seemed to me a particularly disabling idea and, as it happens, not even close to social property relations in the 21st century | 169 the truth. i’ve argued endlessly that global capital needs the state, in many ways more than before, and that it remains a very relevant target of struggle, so i won’t go on about it here again but, again, i think it’s worth considering how the current crisis might dramatically bear out the view that struggles at the level of national states may be the most effective counter to the current depradations of global capital. i certainly wouldn’t dismiss the importance of popular efforts to challenge transnational organizations like the g20, but in the eu, for example, take greece. it’s hard to imagine any popular action on the international stage that could have anything like the effects, however limited so far, brought about by the the upsurge of popular opinion that led to the rise of syriza. even without an electoral victory for that radical party, the rules of the game have changed, not only for the greek government itself but for the politics of europe. jc: your new book liberty and property, a companion to citizens to lords has as an underlying theme the contestation over the meaning of freedom as we currently understand it. what is the significance of this contestation i’m thinking in particular about the putney debates, but stretching from hobbes and locke to the diggers, the original “occupy movement”? in relation to this, can and should, as recently suggested by corey robin – the left reclaim “freedom” as an animating principle, in our rhetoric, in our organizing strategies, in our guiding principles? emw: of course the left should ‘reclaim’ freedom as an animating principle –though i’m not really clear on what it means to suggest that ‘the left’ has ever abandoned it or what particular left we’re talking about. the kind of socialism i’ve always believed in – and i’m hardly alone in this – has always regarded freedom as a central guiding principle. i might be tempted to add that various postmodernist trends have in their own ways tended to undermine such ‘universalistic’ principles. but i’ve said enough about all this too often, so let me try to answer the question as you posed it. for corey robin, if i understand him correctly, the issue really has to do with us politics and how the left can challenge the monopoly claimed by the right on the traditional american ideology of individual freedom and mobilize that ideology in favour of progressive causes. progressives in the us, he suggests, tend to invoke security or equality as their animating principles, which has the effect of treating people not as free and active citizens but as passive beneficiaries of state intervention, social welfare, redistributive policies, and so on. this may be a useful comment on us political discourse; but robin’s argument may beg the essential 170 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism question by conceding too much to rightwing conceptions of rights and liberties, which, in a classically american way, define freedom in opposition to equality and collective solidarity. for me, any convincing idea of freedom has to recognize from the start, for example, that liberty and equality are anything but antithetical and that for vast numbers of people the growing inequality we have today is a restriction, not an enhancement, of individual freedom. one of the points i make in liberty and property is that western conceptions of freedom have long been distorted and constrained by the fact that they owe so much to ideas of ‘liberty’ conceived not as a defence of democratic freedoms but as an assertion of class privilege and the autonomy of dominant property classes in their conflicts with monarchical states or other claimants to superior jurisdiction. of course there have been more democratic ideas too, like those of the levellers and the diggers whom you mention, and they are more likely to recognize the mutual reinforcement of liberty and equality, individual and collective. but we shouldn’t underestimate the influence of the dominant tradition and the ways in which our own ideas are still restricted by it. the other essential point i make in liberty and property, as elsewhere in my work, is that our contemporary ideas of freedom haven’t adequately acknowledged the new forms of power and coercion created by capitalism. it’s not enough to defend our liberties against the power of the state. we also have to consider the compulsions imposed on us by distinctively capitalist forms of coercion – and here i mean not just the excessive power of money in politics, nor even just the power of capital in the workplace, but also the compulsions of the market, its imperatives of profit-maximization and constant capital accumulation. we’re so used to thinking of the market as a realm of choice and freedom that we tend to overlook the degree to which it’s a form of coercion and domination, which compels us to subordinate all other considerations –fairness, social justice, human dignity, ecological sustainability, and, yes, the freedom of the individual – to the demands of profit. a race of cuckoos : cninese migration, anti-chinese logialation and the canadian pacific railway. ronald faust ino-santos chinese labour migration to canada in the nineteenth century is explained in terms of the respective positions of china and canada within the world system. the role of the state in determining this position is discussed . with respect to the several states occupying china, this took the form of attempts to officially regulate the migrant labour trade. the canadian state provided for the general interests of capital by reinforcing the use of chinese as cheap labour for work on railway construction . race as an ideology is used to explain the concrete actions of class fractions as they appropriated racism to promote their material interests . in china this took the form of european merchants and plantation owners aligned against exploited chinese labour. within canada, the merchant class, which favoured political marginal ization of the chinese but not necessarily exclusion , was aligned against the white working class which favoured the outright exclusion of chinese from canada. 42 at the economic level, it is clear that race must be given its distinctive and 'relatively autonomous' effectivity, as a distinctive feature. this does not mean that the economic is sufficient to found an explanation of how these relations concretely function. one needs to know how different racial and ethnic groups were inserted historically, and the relations which tended to erode and transform, preserve these distinctions through time not simply as residues and traces of previous modes, but as active structuring principles of the present organization of society. racial categories will not provide or explain these. what are the different forms and relations in which these racial fractions were combined under capital? do they stand in significantly different relations to capital do they stand within an articulation of different modes of production? .... nevertheless, such an analysis would need to be complemented by an analysis of the specific forms which racism assumes in its ideological functioning. here, we would have to begin by investigating the different ways in which racist ideologies have been constructed and made operative under different historical conditions: the racisms of mercantilist theory and of chattel slavery; of conquest and colonialism; of trade and 'high imperialism'; of 'popular imperialism' and of so-called 'post-imperialism'. in each case, in specific social formations, racism as an ideological configuration has been reconstituted by the dominant class relations and thoroughly reworked (see hall , 1980 : 338 ) . introduction the above quotation establishes the salience of race and ethnicity within capitalism. hall suggests that one must examine the historically specific 'articulation' of race and the economic base, while attributing 'relative autonomy' to race as a 'distinctive feature' of capitalist social relations. this suggests an examination of the material base for racism as well as how racism at the political and ideological level reproduces the existing capital relations structured along racial lines. 43 the purpose of this paper is to examine how class struggle at the political level came to be defined along racial lines within two contexts: the british imperial state in china and the canadian state. this paper will deal specifically with chinese migration to canada in the late nineteenth century. the analysis will tawe place at two levels. the first level will involve an examination of the particular economic conditions within the world capitalist system which led to chinese migration. the role of the british imperial state in promoting this migration will be discussed. in an indirect way the material conditions* within the world system and the role of the british state in creating these conditions contributed to the structuring of class struggle along racial lines in the canadian context. the role of the canadian state in reproducing class relations along racial lines will be examined. moreover, the play of class forces which determined the expression of racism in the canadian state will also be investigated. the focus will be on how racism is appropriated by class fractions to promote their own material interests. true to the method suggested above, the material conditions for the salience of race within capitalist social relations must be established. the salience of race within this particular historical period can be related to the imperialist stage of competitive capitalism. the root of imperialism lies in the tendency of the capitalist system towards cyclical crises, due to the tendency of the rate of profit to fall (trpf), and the 44 resulting barriers in the valorization of capital i bonac ich , 1 984 and hirsch, 1 978 ) . the developed capitalist countries in europe attempted to deal with these crises by exporting capital to its colonies . the export of labour from the colonies as a means to counter the trpf is one of the chief attractions of imperialist expansion ( bonachich , 1 984 : 1 7 ) . employers in the metropole can deal with the trpf by increasing the extraction of absolute surplus value through the lowering of workers' wages (5). workers from the colonies can be paid a lower wage rate than their metropole counterparts because the cost of reproducing migrant labor power is borne by the colony (burawoy, 1976). the state also plays a part in the exploitation of migrant labor power. from the perspective of the colony, the exportation of its labor force is characterized by a relationship of dependency and domination in the form of an international division of labor ( baratt-brown, 1974 ) . in the late nineteenth century, imperialism made britain the 'workshop of the world' to be supplied with raw aterials (including labor) by its colonies. an international division of labor emerged, with advanced european countries being supplied with resources and markets by its colonies. goods manufactured with foreign capital from the colony were then exported back to the metropole. thus, there was an unequal exchange of value between the metropole and the colony with the profit from manufactured goods flowing to the metropole (bonachich, 1984:12-16). the relationship between the colony 45 and the metropole was one of dominance and exploitation on the part of the metropole, and led to the underdevelopment of the colony (16-20). therefore, at the economic level, race is a salient characteristic of capitalist social relations because of the domination of non-european countries by european imperial powers . this is not to reduce race to the needs of capital accumulation. hall (1980) notes that the structures through which black labor is reproduced are not simply 'colored' by race, they work through race. therefore, a problem in marxist conceptualizations of racism is to define racism in such a way as to affirm its material base without reducing it to the economic. miles' (1982) conceptualization of racism as an ideology is the most profitable. he does not attribute the emergence of racism to the capitalist mode of production. miles claims that the relative autonomy of racism as an ideology can be explained in two ways. first, racism in the nineteenth century was the product of a number of relatively 'independent' ideologies such as christianity and 'scientific' racism as well as the 'lived experience' of early explorers to africa. racism was relatively autonomous as well in that it was not reducible to a single class. the most significant aspect of miles' argument is the process by which racism in the nineteenth century was appropriated by the bourgeoisie to legitimate imperialism, "racism was used by those advancing the policy of expansionism as justification for intervention in africa" ( mi les , 1 982 : 1 1 6 ) . the working class can also appropriate racism 46 to further its own material self-interests, as was the case with the anti-oriental policy adopted by organized labor in british columbia. china and the world system non-capitalist social relations can exist within a larger capitalist system. lever-tracy (1983), at a global level, conceptualizes a world system, the general form of which can be characterized as capitalist. subsumed within this capitalist form are non-capitalist social relations which contribute to the world system. bonacich (1984) also attributes the existence of cheap migrant labor to subsistence economies in the periphery. the articulation of china as a non-capitalist social formation within the world capitalist system set the conditions for labour migration from china. this describes accurately the relationship of china to the british state within the world system. the chinese social system in the early seventeenth century can be characterized as feudal, the power resting, on the one hand, with the absentee landlord and the impotence of the landless peasant on the other ( li , 1979 : 326 ) . imperialism laid the ground work for labour emigration to canada because of the considerable displacement which occurred as a result of imperialism in china. local craft workers were driven out of their trades by competition from cheap manufactured imports. peasants were forced off their lands (bonacich, 1984:27). in the competitive stage of capitalism, transitory or propertyless labour was needed in the colonies because settlers 47 became small landowners and were not predisposed to participate in wage labour. (marx in barrat-brown , 1 974 : 50 ) the migrant, with kinship ties elsewhere, was suited to the needs of capital. according to bonachich (1984:27): the temporary nature of colonial labor (sic) was completely rational from the point of view of the emigrant and his family. his supplementary remittances meant a great deal to the well-being of his family in the subsistence sector, while he could only support the most degraded style of life within the capitalist economy. china's integration into the world market was detrimental to its internal development. those who benefited from the chinese migrant labour trade were the imperial states which could expropriate chinese labour for use in the colonies. china, being debt-burdened, was dependent on remittances from its workers abroad for foreign currency ( friedman , 1980 : 1 18 ) . at the political level, the british imperial state played an important role in determining china's mode of articulation within the world system. part i: the imperial state and migrant labour the state plays a crucial role in capitalist expansion, providing the general and external conditions for the accumulation of capital (hirsch 1978:67). the form of the capitalist state can therefore be derived from the laws of motion of capital. the form of the state is bounded and structured by the precondition of its own existence, i.e. the need to attempt to ensure the general conditions for the continued accumulation of capital which individual capitalists cannot create for themselves (67). deri vat ioni sts , like hirsch, are mainly 48 concerned with the modern capitalist state, but the above observation may also be applied to the imperial state. if imperialism is a strategy to counter the trpf, then the imperial state mediates the crisis by providing the political conditions advantageous to imperialist expansionism. thus, the opium wars of 1839 to 1842 marked the coming of western imperialism to china by securing the military domination of china for western imperial powers. during the early part of the seventeenth century, china was a source of raw materials for export to britain. by 1839, china began to be viewed as a potential market for british goods. opium exports to china were a major source of profit for britain. needless to say, china's efforts to stem the flow of opium (due to the growing addiction of the chinese population to the drug) was met with hostility on the part of the british. the sinking of three chinese gunboats on november 3, 1839 marked the beginning of the opium wars. the imperial navy blockaded the yangtze river thereby cutting off the northern part of china from its food source, securing a victory for the british (chan, 1983:23-29). the british state, as a member of the alliance of foreign capital in china, played a role in opening the country to the world market by legitimating the presence of foreign capital in china. before 1842, the trading rights of the western powers were severely curtailed. only one port, canton, was open to foreign traders. the import and export trade was regulated by a 49 group of firms (collectively known as the cohong ) to which the qing government had awarded a monopoly. in return, the cohong closely monitored the activities of all foreigners in canton. all of this changed with the signing of the treaty at nanking which ended the opium wars. this treaty, signed in 1842, provided for the establishment of five treaty ports where foreigners could trade freely. it also ceded hong kong to great britain. more importantly, the treaty abolished the cohong ( chan , 1 983 : 23-29 ) . on the political and diplomatic level, western imperialism laid the groundwork for chinese migration. one third of the foreign treasury of china went to pay reparations for the opium war ( bonacich , 1984 : 30 ) . in 1859, the provincial government of quandong was forced to officially sanction the contract labour trade (230). this could have been due to the fact that allied troops had control of the provincial capital, canton, because of the popular unrest directed at foreigners and specifically, at their involvement in the coolie trade ( campbell , 1 923 : 1 1 9 ) . another important treaty that benefited canada directly was the burlingame treaty of 1868, signed between china and the united states. the treaty affirmed the right "of free migration of aliens and subjects from one country to another." the most favoured nation clause, where rights gained by one imperial nation would apply to all other nations occupying china, automatically granted the same privilege to britain and all its former colonies ( chan , 1983 : 43 ) . the treaties imposed by the imperial powers is an example of 50 how the imperial state provided the general and external conditions for the accumulation of capital by securing the political domination of china by the european powers. the treaties assured the smooth accumulation of capital byintegrating china into the world system. free labour was allowed to circulate from china, essentially removing barriers for its expropriation and facilitating its movement into canada. the military power of the imperialist nations also created an unequal political relationship which meant that the foreign powers were able to regulate the flow of chinese labour. the commerce of migration: the contract labour trade the 'coolie' trade was debt-bondage based on the 'credit-ticket' system by which a chinese worker would be advanced passage money and would therefore be bound to a foreign employer for a certain amount of free labour while having to work off the commission of the coolie-broker. 'coolies' very often could not pay back this debt and were not guaranteed passage back. foreign merchant houses in the treaty ports were connected to a vast network of 'eating houses' in the countryside. these 'eating houses' were run as labour depots by crimps (coolie brokers) who were continually kept informed of the labour market needs in the treaty ports. crimps frequently bought persons outright as debt-payment, reselling them to foreign immigration merchant houses. kidnapping was a common form of recruitment (campbell, 1923:2-120) . the abuses of the 'coolie' system led to an alternative form 51 of labour recruitment which came to be regulated by the foreign powers in china: the contract labour system. the formal distinction between the contract and the credit-ticket systems was that the contract between labourer and employer specified the period of employment and other obligations of the employer and thus protected the labourer ( campbell , 1923 : 91 ) . the chinese labourer was, therefore, selling his labour freely by signing the contract. in practice, there was no distinction between the credit-ticket system and the contract labour system. prospective migrant chinese workers were often coerced into signing contracts by the crimps of the white trading houses. torture was not an uncommon practice for extracting consent (118). the link between the international capitalist labour market and the chinese feudal economy was the comprador. compradors were the traditional merchant brokers ( ya-hang ) who now worked for specific foreign merchant houses. they acted as intermediaries between chinese officials and merchant houses. the hong kong compradors were the principal administrators of the contract labour system and used their kinship and regional ties to promote the trade ( hao , 1970 : 99 ) . the compradors processed migrant workers when they were in hong kong. the agent's task included collecting regular fees from the north american contract labourers for the purposes of registration fees and arranging contracts with foreign companies. he would also be responsible for seeing that remittances from the workers were sent to the workers' family in china, or guaranteed 52 workers' return (dead or alive) to china after the contracts expired. at the north american end there was another network of chinese businessmen known in the u.s. as the six companies and in canada, after 1884, as the chinese benevolent association. 1 (chan, 1983:44 ) . the imperial state and the 'coolie' trade the content of state activities develops through a process of mediated reaction to the crisis in accumulation ( carnoy , 1984 : 142 ) . the evolution of the coolie trade from an unregulated 'industry' to a regulated and state-sponsored trade, is a response by the imperial nation states to the crisis in accumulation brought about by the abolition of slavery and the animosity of the chinese to the 'coolie' trade. race informed this class conflict with white european merchants and plantation owners aligned against exploited chinese labour. the emancipation act of 1833 which abolished slavery in britain and its colonies threatened the dominant mode of production (the plantation economy) in the west indies (campbell , 1923 :86 ) . in 1842, by the terms of the websterashburton treaty, great britain and the united states agreed to enforce the international abolition of the slave trade by patrolling the coast of africa; thus effectively eliminating the trade ( ching-hwang , 1 985 : 32 ) . with the abolition of the slave trade a new source of labour for the west indies and other slave/plantation economies had to be found. the competition for chinese labour became fierce with 53 all the major foreign powers competing for labourers. the high demand led to deceitful practices on the part of the foreign merchant houses. for example, syme-muir inc., the leading foreign coolie broker, confined chinese workers to compounds at the front of the merchant house.' some were held there against their will < campbell , 1 923 : 1 28 ) . given the fierce competition among the foreign powers and the agitation against the trade by the chinese, it was in the interest of the british state to rationalize the trade where it had jurisdiction, and to induce other foreign powers to do likewise. the british state did this in a way which assured the west indian plantation owners that their interests were taken into account. 3 the contract system, which legally bound the worker to the employer for a specified period of time, was favoured by the west indian plantation owners. this was because of the militancy of the chinese who, according to one planter, would not accept wages "lower than the amount at the time" implying that migrant workers were traditionally paid below the average wage rate ( campbell , 1 923 : 89 ) . the contract system was, therefore, a form of labour control. the 'coolie' trade was further disrupted by the fact that the increase in chinese labour recruitment was accompanied by a corresponding increase in the sentiment against it. in canton, a mob killed a group of crimps who had been accused of kidnapping ( campbell , 1923 : 1 19 ) . the opposition to the trade culminated in the 1852 amoy and 1859 shanghai ant i-kidnapping riots. 4 (chinghwang, 1985: 74-81 ) . 54 it was probably the animosity of the chinese and the fierce competition that led the british state to attempt to eliminate the abuses of the 'coolie' trade by negotiating, with the other foreign powers, a contract system universally applicable to all countries participating in the trade. the british state introduced the canton system in 1859 which regulated the trade by appointing a government official to act as agent between west indian plantation owners and chinese labourers. the british emigration house would insure that the labourer entered freely into the contract and that travel accommodations were humane (campbell, 1923:124). the emigration house was to be supported with public funds as well as by a tax on employers of chinese labourers (108). canada, as a colony of britain, benefited from this regulation in that it ensured that 'coolies' were in good health on coming to canada, "if for no other reason than that the investment outlay was greater.'' ( chan , 1983 : 45 ). 5 the material basis for the antagonism between the white working class and chinese labour can be related, in part, to the historically lower subsistence level of asians compared to europeans (creese, 1984:10) and to the fact that the costs of reproducing migrant labour are confined to china. 6 this, in turn, can be attributed to conditions at the level of the capitalist world system; conditions that were created and reproduced by the british imperial state in china. these conditions at the level of the world system contributed in turn to the 'making' of a labour market split along racial lines in british columbia. 7 55 part ii: chinese migration and the canadian state at the national level, the canadian state contributed to the reproduction of the split labour market as well. just as class conflict over the 'coolie' trade was structured by race (i.e. the exploitation of chinese labour by european merchants and plantation owners), race informed class conflict in the canadian context. all of these issues must be discussed within the context of the changing economic structure of canada as well as canada's own 'articulation' within the world system. canada in the world system canada's economy in the early 1800s, like that of any other british colony, was geared to the interests of the british empire. for example, canada was required to take all its imports from britain ( pentland , 1981 : 101 ) . furthermore, canada's economy was geared to the export of staples to britain (131). therefore, canada possessed two basic characteristics of a colonial economy: it was a source of raw materials for the metropole as well a market for its manufactured goods. as naylor has noted, "the metropole defines the character and extent of economic development in the hinterland area" ( naylor , 1 972 : 2 ) . therefore, the general need for chinese labour in the canadian economy can be linked to the interests of the empire. given that canada's economy was geared towards the circulation of staples, the dominant class fraction (the merchant class) had built a considerable trade in timber and grain with 56 britain ( nayior , 1972 : 90 ) . mercantile capital works within the sphere of circulation and accumulates wealth through intermediary activities between producers and consumers (90). therefore, it was in the interest of canadian merchant capital, as well as british capital, to expedite the circulation of raw materials from canada to britain. infrastructure construction (i.e. railways, canals, and roads) which expedites the circulation process, was, therefore, important for mercantile capital and the general needs of the empire. the construction of the cpr can be seen as a state-sponsored attempt to provide the needed infrastructure for merchant capital. 8 it is not surprising, then, that the greatest influx of chinese to british columbia occurred during the construction of the railroad. fifteen thousand chinese labourers worked for andrew onderdonk, the largest railroad contractor, between may 1880 and july 1885 ( chan, 1983 : 63 ) . in 1882 alone, onderdonk contracted with lian chan inc. for two thousand workers from hong kong (wickberg et al, 1982: 21). several authors have commented on the fact that the presence of chinese labour dampened wages because of their lower subsistence level compared to whites ( berton, 1971 ; chan, 1983 and fang, 1931). thus, chinese migrant labour helped to promote the interests of the empire by being a source of cheap labour, acting as a damper on the wages of white workers, especially with respect to keeping the cost of railway construction down. the low cost of chinese labour relative to white labour 57 resulted in antagonisms between these class fractions. the practices of white employers and that of the canadian state contributed to conditions in the labour market which formed the material foundation for racial antagonisms. the labour market, split along racial lines, was the structure in which this antagonism took place. 9 at the political level, one way in which the state reproduced this labour market was by politically marginalizing the chinese. first, chinese and asians in general were accorded the official status of 'non-settler' by the canadian government ( creese , 1 984 : 15 ) . second, in a series of amendments to the voter's act, the british columbian legislature disenfranchised the chinese at the provincial and municipal level (wickberg et al., 1982:83). by 1920, the chinese were formally disenfranchised at all levels of government (119). the stage was set for labour to make anti-orientalism an issue in their political conflict with capital. organized labour and racism by the middle of the nineteenth century, the economic structure of canada began to shift gradually from a staple economy to a nascent industrial economy: "mercantile capital and an unmistakable agrarian dominance gave way to a more pervasive industrial capitalism" ( palmer , 1983 : 60 ) . one particular consequence of the gradual shift from a staple to an industrial economy was the rise of organized labour and an increase in class conflict. "the 1880s was a decade of unprecedented working 58 class militancy and cultural cohesion" (99). one of the largest and most influential labour organizations was the knights of labor. in the west, workers' associations made ant l-or lental ism a vital plank in their policy platforms. for example, r.d. pitt, master workman for the vancouver chapter of the knights of labor, ran on an anti-chinese platform and later formed the anti-chinese league. (wickberg et al . , 1982 : 62 ) . another anti-chinese organization, the working man's protective association ( wpa ) , was formed in victoria under noah shakespeare, an avowed racist (48). the explicitly racist ideology of the wpa can be seen in its declarations of purpose, which were: the mutual protection of the working class in b.c. against the great influx of chinese; to use all legitimate means for the suppression of their immigration; to assist each other in the obtaining of employment; and to devise means for the amelioration of the condition of the working class of this province in general ( 48 ) . at the national level, much of the success of the trades and labor congress of canada between 1880-1900 can be attributed to its anti-oriental policy which tended to unify otherwise dissenting groups. ireland (1960) suggests that the trades and labor congress incorporated the chinese exclusionary policy in their platform of principles largely as an expedient measure to secure continued support from british columbian representatives. it would be a mistake to reduce labour's racist attitudes to differences in wages. implicit in a racist ideology is that one race possesses a moral and cultural superiority over all otner races. this 'moral imperative' is used as a rationale for the 59 domination of one racial group over another. therefore, labour representatives expressed negative attitudes towards chinese in moral and cultural terms when calling for their exclusion. this can be seen in the submission of the nanaimo trades association to the royal commission on chinese immigration, vice, including prostitution and gambling, is abundant in those (chinese) quarters .... they are a non-assimilat ing race. their vices are most disgusting. they turn their sick out to die in the streets and their lepers to fill our prisons .... our children oust seek employment in other countries to make room for a race of cuckoos ... in fact, the results of our investigation brings us to the conclusion that the chinese are a disgrace to a civilised community, and we beg that steps may be taken to stop the influx of chinese to our shores ( 54 ) . the wpa ' s declaration of purpose clearly shows that the 'working class' was defined along racial terms, marked by the exclusion of chinese labour. chinese labourers were in effect seen as 'non-workers', and possibly sub-human, if we consider seriously the submission of the nanaimo trades association. racist attitudes, therefore, informed the political strategies of the labour movement. instead of seeking to include the chinese in the organized labour structures, the canadian labour movement sought to exclude them from canada. this, of course, reinforced the position of the chinese in the labour market. in the long run this strategy was detrimental to the working class as a whole . racism was appropriated by certain class fractions to further their own self-interests. the specific issue was anti-chinese legislation. the political power of labour was 60 growing and the calls for exclusionary legislation could not go unheeded. cheap migrant labour was needed for the completion of the railway, but the availability of a cheap labour supply was not in the interests of the white working class. the positions of capitalists and the working class with respect to anti-chinese legislation varied according to their class interests. capitalists could be seen as favouring forms of anti-chinese legislation which created the political conditions that favoured the continued exploitation of chinese labour. capitalists then would favour legislation politically marginalizing the chinese, but not necessarily excluding them from canada. the working class, on the other hand, would favour legislation that would terminate the use of the chinese as a source of cheap labour. given the racist attitudes of the working class, this meant calls for the exclusion of chinese workers from canada. these issues will be dealt with in the next section. a short review of anti-chinese legislation in canada the evolution of anti-chinese legislation from political marg inalizat ion to de facto exclusion can be explained in terms of class conflict at the political level. more specifically, the change in anti-chinese legislation can be attributed to the growing political power of organized labour. a review of anti-chinese legislation will show, however, that the political pressure from labour for exclusionary chinese legislation was resisted until the completion of the cpr. the string of exclusionary anti-chinese legislation since 61 1885 was the culmination of anti-chinese sentiment evident since the 1860s. 10 the gold rush period marked a sudden surge of economic prosperity for victoria which was transformed fron 'a quiet english village' into a busy commercial centre 'with several thousand residents'" (13). while racism did not find expression in legislation at the provincial or federal level, racist sentiments against the chinese were already evident in 1858. amor de cosmos, editor of the colonist and prominent vancouver island businessman, wrote that the chinese were: inferior to europeans and americans in ability, hostile to us in race language and habits and may remain among us a pariah race . . . when the time arrives that we can dispose of them, we will heartily second a check to their immigration (43). the first attempt at monitoring chinese immigration to the west coast came as early as 1860 when the house of assembly colony of vancouver island proposed a poll tax of $10 to be levied on each chinese (42). the tax was opposed by amor de cosmos who, despite his racism, believed that chinese labour was profitable for the colony (43). this is a prime example of 'situational' racism since he would later be at the fore of anti -oriental agitation. by 1864, the gold boom began to level off and antagonisms between white and chinese labour in the cariboo began to grow (44). it was not surprising that the most strident voices for anti-chinese legislation came from labour representatives. for example, noah shakespeare, leader of the racist working man's protective association and a victoria city councillor, was responsible for legislation banning the chinese from city works u8) the first attempt at banning the chinese from railway construction came five years before the government of canada called tenders for railway construction. john robson (a pro-labour member from nanaimo ) presented a resolution in the provincial legislature prohibiting the hiring of any chinese on any public works in the province, effectively banning the chinese from the proposed railway construction (46). this motion was defeated on the grounds that it interfered with free enterprise (46). when the government of canada called tenders for railway construction in 1877, the governor of british columbia petitioned j. a. macdonald to insert in all contracts a clause prohibiting the employment of chinese workers (20). this appeal was rejected by the macdonald government (20). amor de cosmos presented a petition to the government of canada calling for the exclusion of chinese from railway construction as well as other proposals designed to exclude chinese immigration to canada ( -18 ) . these proposals were rejected although the petition did prod the macdonald government to create a select committee, chaired by amor the cosmos, to examine the 'oriental question' (49). up to the time of the select committee it seems that the form of racist legislation was meant to politically marginalize the chinese. all attempts at outright exclusion were rebuffed by the canadian government. further evidence of this can be seen in the response of the macdonald government to the select committee report. while the 63 recommendat ions of the committee are not known, the fact that it was chaired by one of british columbia's leading racists and that oniy two witnesses spoke favourably of the chinese, (49) is a good indication of what the recommendations must have been. it would appear that no official policies came from the committee's recommendations. the government of the day seems to have subordinated calls for chinese exclusion to the completion of the railway. as macdonald bluntly told members of parliament from british columbia, if they wanted the railway built they would have to accept chinese labour (49). the macdonald government's actions in 1884 are also significant. in 1884, the provincial parliament of british columbia proposed an act which would levy a head tax on all chinese in british columbia and forbid them from owning crown lands (56). the government of canada disallowed the bill. 11 however, macdonald was forced to commit himself to an investigation of chinese immigration restrictions and measures to regulate chinese migration. the result was the royal commission of 1884 (55). in february of 1885, the provincial act of 1884 was reenacted as a protest to the perceived ineffectual solutions to chinese immigration proposed by the commission of 1884 (56). this was a direct threat to the completion of the railway. as onderdonk wrote to george stephen, president of the cpr: a large number of chinamen will necessarily have to come from oregon and california in the spring to work on your road above kamloops. it would be well for you to see that this act is disallowed immediately (see ward, 1978:39) . 64 macdonald disallowed the act for the second time (39j. the royal commission that macdonald had been forced to create to investigate chinese immigration gave full expression to racism in british columbia. unfair competition between chinese and white workers was a major issue. other issues were raised concerning the shortcomings of chinese culture, including: the hazard they posed to the health of the white community (chinese were unclean and spread disease); and their morality (gamblers and opium smokers (39). the recommendations of the commissioners are especially enlightening because they represent the class-selective nature of official racism against the chinese. mr. justice gray readily admitted that the chinese were a 'boon to the economy'. the principle which should govern future legislation was a policy of "judicious selection" to make sure that "the great interests and enterprises not be harmed" (40). it is more than apparent that justice gray had the interests of the large capitalists at heart. unlike in 1879, when the government of canada ignored the findings of the select committee, the government acted swiftly on the commission's recommendations. this may have been due, in part, to the fact that the railway was nearing completion. according to chan (1984) the railway was completed in july 29,1885. the new chinese immigration act gained royal assent on july 20, 1885 (see wickberg et al . . 1982). it is true that part of the explanation for the emergence of exclusionary legislation can be a attributed to the growing 65 political power of labour. this can be seen in the evolution of anti-chinese legislation in the late nineteenth century from those measures to politically marginalize the chinese, to those which exclude them from immigrating to canada. creese (1984) has noted that the denial of political franchise and the progressively more stringent restrictions and taxes on asian immigration occurred through pressure by the working class and small business rather than at the 'behest' of the capitalists in british columbia (although it may have been in their long term sel finterests ) . calls for the exclusion and di senf ranchisement of the chinese were made by labour. one can make the argument that the actual point at which the demands of labour were expressed in the state occurred at the behest of capital. witness how macdonald studiously ignored petitions for measures to exclude chinese labour from railway construction, or for measures to exclude chinese immigration before the end of railway construction was in sight, or in his twice-ordered disallowance of british columbia's attempts at exclusionist legislation -given, it seems, at the bidding of the president of the cpr. thus, it seems that the particular expression of racism in the canadian state, here in the form of anti-chinese legislation -from political marginal ization to de facto exclusion -was subordinated to the needs of capital accumulation and reflected the power of the working class in relation to capital within the state at that particular historical moment. 66 conclusions we have seen in the above discussion that race played an important part in the structuring of class relations along racial lines in british columbia. at the level of the world system, race was made salient as a structuring element of class relations in british columbia through the imperial expansionism of the european powers. the british state played a crucial role in creating the conditions which indirectly contributed to the significance of race in british columbia by creating conditions at the level of the world system which favoured labour migration from china. the concrete actions of the british state in creating these conditions was determined by the play of class forces in china. class conflict in china proper was structured along racial lines with exploited chinese labour aligned against the white plantation owners and the foreign trading house merchants . within the canadian context, race was made a salient feature of class relations in three ways: first, through the practices of white employers who used chinese as a source of cheap labour and as strike-breakers; secondly, through the appropriation of a racist ideology by the canadian white working class and the canadian merchant capitalist class to further their own material self-interests; and thirdly, through the practices of the canadian state which, firstly, politically marginalized the chinese and then proceeded to exclude them from canada. as in the british imperial state, the concrete activities of 67 the state were conditioned by class conflict. specifically, expressions of racism in the state, in the form of anti-chinese legislation, were conditioned by the play of class forces at the political le\el. one could further speculate that the relatively weak position of the white working class vis a vis the capitalist class could have been improved if chinese labour were incorporated into existing labour organizations. again, however, we see the influence of a racist ideology on the balance of class forces . notes 1. chinese contract labour in canada seems to have been principally organized through the affiliates of the larger chinese merchant houses operating in the united states. the recruitment of chinese from the united states for the railway was undertaken by a chinese company, the lian chang company, organized by a chinese businessman from san francisco, (see wickberg et al . . 1982 : 21 ) other affiliates of chinese merchant houses in the united states supplying chinese labour to british columbia include the hop kee and co. of san francisco which arranged with the shipping company allan lowe and co. for passage to victoria on the caribbean for 300 chinese (13). evidence seems to indicate, however, that the dominant company dealing in chinese labour recruitment to the railway was non-chinese, stahlschmidt & ward. this company received five thousand of the eight thousand chinese who landed in victoria during 1882 (21). 2. the common designation for the recruitment of migrant chinese was the 'buying and selling of pigs'. the compounds in front of the foreign trading houses where migrant chinese waited to be shipped out were called 'pig-pens' ( campbell , 1 923 : 97 ) . this term accurately reflects the living conditions within these compounds . 3. for example while calling for the end to the abuses of the coolie trade, the british state introduced legislation narrowing the permissible minimum space allowed for asian and black workers on ships. minimum allowable space on ships was reduced from 15 to 12 feet for 'natives of asia or africa' ( campbell , 1 923 : 1 08 ) . 68 4. in both instances the riots centered around the kidnapping of chinese by crimps for the foreign merchant houses (hongs) which dealt in the 'coolie' trade. the amoy riot was sparked by the actions of mr. syrae of syme, muir 4 co., a foreign 'hong' with a notorious reputation for abusive 'coolie' recruitment practices. mr. muir attempted to forcibly 'liberate' one of his 'crimps' (who was charged with kidnapping) from the chinese authorities (ching-hwa, 1985:75). the ensuing riot left twelve killed and sixteen wounded (campbell, 1923: 101 ) . the shanghai riots were precipitated by the friends and relatives of kidnapped chinese who attacked foreign sailors of 'coolie 'bearing ships. the mob attacked several people including the inspector general of the chinese maritime customs and a british doctor (ching-hwa, 1923 : 81 ) . 5. other foreign powers were quick to follow the british lead. all foreign consuls gave their support to the canton system. in december 1859, the french emigration agent formally applied and received permission from the governor-general of quandong to establish an emigration house under the canton system. the spanish also established emigration houses in canton. the american consul required all american ships to conform to the regulations governing emigration under contract, pending receipt of further instructions from the secretary of state (campbell ,1923:12 6127). enforcement of a contract labour system applicable to all foreign powers proved to be a problem in the years following the canton system. under the canton system no labour recruitment was allowed outside of licensed emigration houses in the treatyports. in reality, a substantial amount of the trade was still conducted outside of the emigration houses. subsequent attempts at the replacement of the coolie trade with a contract labour system, such as the peking regulations of 1866, proved to have limited success. the abuses of the coolie trade persisted until 1874 when portugal, the last of the foreign powers which still sanctioned the trade, abolished it in macao (chinghwang, 1985 : 103) . 6.burawoy (1976) has made a similar argument in his analysis of south african and mexican migrant workers. the relative low cost of migrant labour is due to the fact that the reproduction costs of the worker are borne by the migrant's family at the periphery. 7. creese (1984) applies the split labou market model to describe the labour market structure in british columbia during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. the essence of the split labour according to bonachich is that the dynamic of capitalism attempts to drive down the price of labour, and an 69 ethnically split labour market results from the differential resources available to dearer and cheaper workers in tneir attempt to improve wages and working conditions (see in creese, 1984 : 6 ) . 8.naylor (1972) has pointed to the fact that the national policy of the macdonald government i of which the construction of the cpr was only an aspect; was a construct of the merchant class to benefit its material interests by suppressing the growth of other class fractions of the bourgeoisie i.e. the petite bourgeoisie and the 'nascent' industrial class. 9. the relative cheapness of chinese labour, aside from the existence of a split labour market, can also be attributed to the form of labour recruitment used by the railroad contractors. chinese labour was not contracted individually, but in work gangs. probably*, an agent of the contracting company was resident in the camp. each gang had a non-chinese foreman or 'herder' who was responsible to the construction company (wickberg et al. . 1983 : 22 ) according to muszynski, (1986) the chinese labourers were forced into a continuing dependence on the contractor. the cycle of continuing indebtedness prevented the workers from going back to china. thus the chinese custom of indebtedness was used as an instrument to provide for a pool of cheap labour, this is an instance of a precapitalist relation of production being used within a capitalist mode of production . ( 93 ) 10. the first piece of anti-chinese legislation meant to exclude chinese immigrants to canada was passed in 1885 in the form of a $50 head tax levied on every chinese entering canada. the special tax was raised to s10q in 1900 and $500 in 1903. anti-chinese sentiment reached a climax in 1923 when the parliament of canada passed the chinese immigration act which basically excluded all chinese from entering canada. between 1925 and 1947, the year that the chinese immigration act was repealed, chinese immigration to canada was virtually stopped (li, 1979:323). 11. the chinese in british columbia did not depend on the charity of the federal government to ensure that their rights were protected. in 1878, the government of british columbia attempted to pass what amounted to a head tax on all chinese (wickberg et al . 1982:48). opposition was immediate and culminated in a general strike by the chinese community (lasting five days) where stores closed, domestic servants stayed away from homes, chinese workers refused to report to hotels and boot factories. the governor general of canada disallowed the law on october 28, 1879 (49) . 70 references barat -brown , 1974 the economics of imperialism . middlesex, england: penguin book ltd. berton, pierre 1971 the last spike . montreal: mcclelland and stewart ltd. bonacich, edna and lucie cheng 1 984 labour immigration under capitalism: asian workers in the united states . berkeley: university of california press . burawoy, micheal 1981 "the functions and reproduction of migrant labor: comparative material from southern africa and the united states", american journal of sociology : 1050-1087. cambell, persia 1923 chinese coolie emigration . new york: negro universities press. carnoy , martin 1984 the state and political theory . princeton: princeton university press chan, anthony 1983 gold mountain . vancouver: new star books creese, gillian 1984 "immigration policies and the creation of an ethnically segmented work force in british columbia 1880-1923", alternate routes . vol 7, pp. 1-34. friedeman, edward 1980 "maoist conceptulaizat ions of the capitalist world system" in the process of the world system . terence k. hopkins and immanuel wallerstein (eds. ) pol itical economy of the world system annuals . vol 3, london: sage publications hall , stuart 1980 "race articulations and societies structured dominance", unesco sociological theories race colonisation . paris: unesco hao , yen-p ' ing 1970 the comprador in nineteenth century china . cambridge mass: harvard university press 71 riirscr., joachim 1978 'the state apparatus and social reproduction: elements of a theory of the bourgeoisie state" in j. holloway and s. picciotio (eds. ) state and capital: a marxist debate . usa: london publishers co. ireland, ralph r. 1960 "some effects of oriental immigration on canadian trade lnion ideology", american journal of economics and sociology , vol.19, pp. 217-220. lenin, v.i. 1939 imperialism highest stage of capitalism . isa: international publishers co. lever-tracy, constance 1983 "immigrant workers and postwar capitalism: in reserve or core troops in the front line ", pol itics and society , vol.12, no . 2 , pp. 125-57. li , peter 1979 "a historical approach to ethnic stratification: the case of the chinese in canada" the canadian review of sociology and anthropology . vol.16, no. 3, pp. 3 20332. and b. sing bolaria 1979 "canadian immigration policv and assimilation theory' in john allen ed. economy class and social reality . toronto: buttersworth mcenvoy , f.j. 1982 "a symbol of racial discrimination: the chinese immigration act and canada's relations with china, 1942-1947", canadian ethnic studies . vol. xiv no. 3 muszynski , alicja 1986 "class formation and class consciousness: the making of shoreworkers in the bc fishing industry", studies in political economy 20 summer. nay lor, r.t. 1972 "the rise and fall of the third commercial empire of the st. lawrence", in g.teeple, capitalism and the national question in canada , pp. 2-36. 72 palmer, bryan 198 3 working class experience: the rise and reconst 1 tut ion of canadian labour: 1800-1980 . toronto: butterworth and co. ltd. pentland, h.c. 1981 labour and capital in canada 1650-1860 . toronto: james lorimer and co. shaw, p. 19 7 5 migration theory and fact: a review and bibliography of current literature . philadelphia: regional research i nst l tute yen, ching-wang 1985 coolies and mandarins . singapore: university of singapore press. 73 nationalism and class: a case application henri lustiger-thaler this paper examines the relationship between class and nationalism within quebec. an effort has been made to reconstruct the historical narrative through reference to suggestive and complex factors of political discourse. in the quebec conjuncture, the crossroads of these varied forms of discourse have had a profound effect upon the disorganization of working class ascendency in the political sphere. this paper sheds light upon the nature of the present vacuum at the center of the mainstream nationalist crisis. dans cette etude, nous nous penchons sur le rapport qui existe au quebec, entre les phenomenes de classe et de nationalisme . ce faisant, nous nous sommes ef forces de reconstruire la trame historique, a la lumiere des elements signif icatif s et complexes du discours politique. dans le contexte quebecois, la rencontre de ces differentes formes du discours a contribue de facon marquante a la disorganisation deja amorcee de 1' influence de la classe ouvriere sur la vie politique. dans cette etude, nous tentons egalement de faire la lumiere sur la nature du vide presentement au coeur de la crise du courant nationaliste. introduction the relationship between class and nationalism in quebec has often been posed within the context of assigning broad or at times narrow definitions to ethnicity as the primary analytic format. similarly, the class-oriented structuralist analyses by marxists and non-marxists alike have often been reduced to the now classic framework of a rising regional and/or petite bourgeoisie as the sole gatekeepers of the new politico-territorial consciousness. this paper will argue, on the contrary, that nationalism within relatively homogeneous societies is expressed as well as appropriated by various class interests under the pervasiveness of a complex hegemony. whilst the expression of this hegemonic process is deeply rooted in cultural, social and economic factors, its manifestation becomes most apparent in the realm of political discourse and "popular' organization. in this regard, i will attempt to explain the contradictions which exist between the organized sector of the quebec working class and the contemporary nationalist format. in the process, i will be underlining the problematic and protean nature of these varied ideological positions. the case studies which will be reviewed for this task are the confederation des syndicats nationaux (csn) and the federation des travailleurs du quebec (ftq). both of these union centrals have often been uncritically identified with the nationalist persona since the early 1960s. i shall show that this relationship is best understood within the contemporary complex of class alliances. in so doing, this paper, in a broader sense, equally addresses the effects which the contemporary mainstream nationalist discourse has had upon the disorganization of working class ascendancy in the political sphere. 62 theoretical considerations the question of class and nationalism is primarily a problem within marxism itself. in effect, how does one relate nationalism, a political manifestation, and its defining characteristics within the working classes in a paradigm which lacks a comprehensive approach to political organization?^ the association of these two analytic processes, i.e., class and nationalism, have, however, provided an intellectual and pragmatic agenda of some debate. no doubt, this has been due in some part to the instrumentalist perspective often found at the heart of the controversy itself. the essence of the polemic revolves around the inherent and seemingly irreconcilable priority of one historic category and its explanatory features to the detriment of the other. attempts to redress the contradictory nature of these two concepts have generated various interpretations. within marx's own writing the issue of nationalism, though an implicit undercurrent, remains a relatively undeveloped notion. davis (1975:3) attributes this condition to the general absence of a systematic political theory within marx's early and later monographs. without doubt, nationalism as a legitimate area of study has been relegated to a secondary and epiphenomenal status precisely because of the analytic primary accorded to class analysis within the historically specific materialist framework. in this regard, the contradictions arising between these two concepts creates a cancelling effect in the production of analytic terms when, in fact, they are particularly needed. bloom (1941:16) has argued that marx used the concepts of nation and nationhood less than rigorously. in fact, early mention of these designations were fraught with ambiguity. as bloom has shown in his meticulous and seminal study of national concepts within capital , marx often made reference to the nation with considerable licence, using it as a synonym for country, state, and occasionally, the ruling class of a given country. 63 the general thrust of bloom's argument merits some consideration. in his view, marx considered the national question in an indirect manner. therefore, nationalism became an implicit notion within the many monographs. it is in the totality of marx's analyses regarding the problematic of modern and earlier societies that one finds the national perspective. in this light, for marx, a nation as well as a society represented a degree of autonomy and self-consciousness within a particular historical bloc. nations in this sense were often depicted in marx's writing as containing necessary historical background which centered around traditions, questions of unification and so forth. ^ these preconditions were then set against the identifiable structure of class relations. one of the approaches various writers have used to assess marx's thought on the national question, and its expression amongst various classes, has been to decipher his usage of such terms as "the national class and the universal class.' in this instance, bloom posits the horizontal notion of class and the vertical concept of nationalism as fundamental inquiries into the process of class struggle. this dichotomy, he argues, is resolved through marx's use of the concept of "national class' (1941:59). this class, bloom asserts, assumes a leadership role regarding the organization of production and the content of social, political and legal institutions. it is, in a sense, the juncture within marx's work wherein class meets the nation. the "national interest' in this regard is subservient to the interests of the national class, a role traditionally occupied by the bourgeoisie. davis (1967) questions the usefulness of the national class concept, so central to bloom's understanding of marx. for davis, though there are many references in marx's work to the leading class, national class and universal 64 class, caution should be exercised in their explanatory value. he finds within bloom's classic study a notion of common purpose hovering tenuously over the battlefield of contending classes (76). haupt, lowy and weill (1974) have also examined the relationship between class and nationalism in marx's work. these writers have, however, attributed considerably less emphasis to concepts such as the national class in their search for an explanatory correlation. an analysis of national implications in marx's work, they assert, must recognize his emphasis upon the absolute primacy of class formation above any other historic category or process. they argue (33): (a) the nation in this regard is a transitory category that corresponds to the development of capitalism and its peculiarities, (b) there is an absence in marx's work of an explicit theoretical position vis-a-vis nationalism. there is however an implicit assertion in marx's work not to treat the problematic in an autonomous manner, i.e., affording it a theoretical status, (c) the notion of nationalism often developed incidentally is however present in all of marx's work as a condition of historic legacy. for marx, according to haupt et al . , the issue of nationalism, in whatever context, was never a goal in itself, but an instrument within which workers may or may not pursue their own interests. certainly, this was an important element in marx and engels' analysis of german unity in 1848. it was also in this sense that marx supported the unification of italy and germany during the 1860s as revolutionary events even though he acknowledged the immediate benefits accrued by the bourgeoisie. marx's writing on the irish question was another example of how he dealt with the problem. it was within a consideration of the irish question that marx and engels in effect dealt with the notion of the oppressed nation through an understanding of the 65 articulation between national interests and the progression of working class interests. this was, of course, always placed within the larger framework of class struggle outside the exigencies of the particular nation-state. in fact, as marx argued, ireland was without question the key to solving the english question, as england itself was the key to resolving the larger european question. most representative of the modern marxist approach to the question of self-determination is the work of nairn (1981). he equates the growth of nationalism with the political entry of the lower classes into the actual process of history. nationalism receives its social and political thrust from a joint occurrence of external pressure and an internal balance of class forces (41). as nairn would argue, nationalism arises when conscious middle class elites react to the phenomenon of uneven development through the mobilization of cross-class characteristics, myth, etc. the populist element of nationalist or revolutionary nationalist movements receives its momentum at this crossroads in class relations. national self-determination, nairn asserts, whether of the left or the right is never independent of class structure. it has, however, become the mobilizing ideology most effective in portraying the common concerns of a given society and that society's perception of its own internal and external relations. nairn argues in this regard for an amended version of lenin's conception of self-determination. however, whereas lenin's grappling with the problem took place within the historic context of the multinational state, new theorizing, it seems clear from nairn's position, must proceed from the uneven development of modern capitalism. 66 for nairn, the silent intellectual interim between the vibrant 1914 debates of lenin and luxembourg and recent theorizing in the area of class and the nation are linked to various historic weaknesses in marxist studies. principally, this area of concern is one in which marxism has tended to be particularly vague, i.e., the analysis of political structures and the state, particularly the bourgeois democratic state and its accompanying ideology. secondly, in areas where marxism is particularly strong, such as historical development, orthodoxy has prevented new approaches until the recent growth in developmental studies. nairn's contention, in a reformulation of lenin's dictum, postulates that nationalism has been the necessary alliance sought by the middle classes with the working class in the form of a new political complex. this process, he contends, is particular to the current stage of capitalist development in the first as well as the third worlds. hobsbawm has become nairn's most articulate interlocutor regarding the problematic relationship of marxism and nationalism. briefly, in a rebuttal to nairn's thesis, he argues three salient points: first, addressing nairn's assertion of the positive characteristics of nationalism in the global capitalist system, he argues that independent sates are clearly dependent upon a global economy which transforms sovereignty into a modern form of dependence. in effect, as hobsbawm asserts, transnational neo-colonialism favours a maximization of sovereign states to effect a minimization of power under which foreign capital will ultimately have to operate.-' second, he argues that there is a danger that territorial demands would come to be seen as the criterion of a potential nation. hobsbawm's concern here is that this assumption can too easily become a premise for satisfying the various aims of groups. this second observation ties in well with his third consideration which remains the problem of how to organize the co-existence of various 67 ethnic linguistic factors in indivisible areas under the guise of nationalism to the exclusivity of one or the other group. in hobsbawm's view, therefore, nationalism, far from clarifying class relations, at best obscures and prohibits the development of socialism within individual nation-states (1977:7) clearly, the central question asked earlier regarding the relationship of the working classes and nationalism retains a significant level of complexity as well as ambiguity. this has been the case particularly when seen in purely structuralist terms, as by our previous authors, or in a more strategic design, as put forward by hobsbawm. the parameters, therefore, within which the question has been posed are delineated by a towering sense of irreconcilability. the task remains to draw upon a framework which puts the problematic upon a different terrain and suggests, if but in a broad theoretical context, an analysis of levels of articulation between and within social classes while maintaining the essential position of historical materialism. gramsci and nationalism antonio gramsci's conceptualization of the relationship amongst social groups, particularly within the political sphere, offers, at the very least, a point of departure. in this sense, gramsci's understanding of the complex interplay of social relations suggests a method by which to progress from the structure in which classes are constituted at the economic level (i.e., fundamental classes and class fractions) to the political level in which classes and class fractions combine. gramsci's notion of the political allows us to project the issue of nationalism toward the level of superstructure, to give it a complex political stance while maintaining the 68 essential link with structure itself. for gramsci, the relationship of these two levels is, in effect, mediated by the political . ^ pivotal to this form of analysis, which lays a significant emphasis upon political discourse, is the gramscian notion of hegemony. hegemony refers to the dialectic relation of class forces. as hall, lumley and mclennan have asserted (1978:79), the richness of the concept allows an analysis that keeps the levels of the social formation distinct "and yet held in combination." hegemony: an operationalization for gramsci, hegemony (and its numerous ideological components) is tied to the political moment and is achieved "experiencially" through such inclusive notions as transformism and expansiveness. as he contended in the prison notebooks , transformism is indicative of parties of the left and right who merge their interests in the form of common political programs. this aspects of hegemony is synonymous with the notion of passive revolution , wherein class interests become neutralized through political groupings. a transformist hegemony, as gramsci argued, is a process of class absorption wherein the class striving for hegemony has extended its ideological hold ...active elements produced by allied groups and even of those which come from antagonistic groups and seemed irreconcilably hostile (1971:59). the above form of hegemony, and this can be practically read as a type of corporatism, entails a strong dose of political momentum and implies the steady absorption of elites. the dialectic of a transformist hegemony is the expansive hegemony. expansive hegemony results in consensus wherein the interests of the popular 69 classes would be adopted by the hegemonic class and thus give rise to the creation of a genuine "national popular will." these two notions of hegemony as a "lived relation" have, therefore, two components, as mouffe (1979:183) points out: (a) the ability to neutralize class interests ( transformism) , and (b) an articulation of class interests (expansiveness ) which through their full development would ultimately bring to the foreground their inherent contradictions. such an understanding of hegemony would suggest that ideology, through its material base (social class), develops "inter-class subjects which manifest themselves politically." the essence of the problem rests in understanding the development of a given hegemony and the political processes whereby we can pinpoint the adoption of one world view by a social class with apparent differing interests. an application and analysis: quebec the following discussion of class and nationalism in quebec will be divided into three distinct time periods: (a) 1960 to 1965; the period of the quiet revolution characterized by its transformist qualities. (b) 1966 to 1975; a period of sustained state repression indicative of a harsher "transformism', bordering upon integration by coercion. (c) 1976 to 1980; the political ascendancy of the parti quebecois and the referendum on sovereignty-association characterized by the expansive nature of class alliances. each conjuncture is typified by a particular form of nationalism as exemplified by the mainstream (political parties) as well as marginal 'nationalist political groups) political current. it is impossible within the confines of this paper to elaborate upon the exact nature of these 70 periodic mainstream nationalise expressions. i have done this in some detail elsewhere ( 1984 :28-47 ) . it i_s however possible to appraise the positions of the two union centrals under consideration during these same periods and thereby establish their divergence or capitulation to the predominant political expression. these two centrals have played a unique role in the intellectual formation and dissemination of ideas within the quebec working class. this becomes particularly important given the absence of a legitimate left-oriented political party within the province. 1960-1965: the transformist project of the modernizing state the confederation des syndicats nationaux (csn) entered the decade of the sixties having surmounted a vast array of structural changes. in may 1961, jean marchand was elected president of the organization, succeeding roger mathieu. the marchand period, which lasted until 1965, was characterized externally by the transformative project of the lesage liberals and internally by a particular genre of trade-union reformism. a review of minutes of annual congresses through the marchand period provides a perspective on these important years. the fortieth congress of the csn in 1962 occurred within a span of great expansion for the central. specifically, massive reform of the educational system and the development of the social service sector by the state created a significant reservoir for syndical growth. as shown in table 1, the public service sector representation within the csn increased roughly 100% in a six year period. similarly, industrial and skilled workers decreased in relative terms. 71 table 1 : composition of membership of the csn by sector of activity by percentage 1960-1981 1960 1966 1973 1981 public service sector 27 52 67 56 industrial and skilled workers 73 48 33 44 source: rouillard, histoire de la csn 1921-1981 surrounding these internal structural changes were, however, the political realities operating in the larger social formation. major themes throughout the union literature during this period were focused upon attempts by the csn to clarify its role in relation to the state in both its provincial and federal form . this type of dialogue took place during a period of structural symbiosis and a growing ideological affinity of the union central within the modernization projects of the lesage liberals. the groundwork for this political response was laid at the 1962 convention which dealt specifically with various strategies for political action in view of the federal and provincial state structures. marchand addressed himself at some length to the 1959 constitution of the csn concerning the substance of its political outlook. the following is a condensed version of positions taken during the 1959 convention (csn, 1962:48-49) : (a) to reaffirm the csn's independence toward political parties; (b) to pledge complete freedom of affiliated organizations regarding political action as long as it caused no prejudice to the general interest of the movement and (c) to restrict political interventions on the part of the president or the secretary general during electoral campaigns. marchand sought to change various precepts of the 1959 charter. primarily, the political independence of the csn would remain intact, i.e., 72 trade unions and policies would remain disjointed realities lest political opinions weaken and divide the union. however, the president or the secretary general would have the power to make political interventions during election campaigns. marchand went further and suggested that the confederated board of the csn should, under certain circumstances, recommend support for a party of its choosing. this reassessment must be seen within the support of affiliated locals for the new democratic party, and the more immediate provincial political stage in which the lesage liberals were dominant. in effect, marchand' s amendments were intended to address the central's lukewarm support of the ndp, the proportionally greater support of the ndp within the locals and the central's increasing reformist pact with the provincial state. the forty-first congress which took place in 1964 resembled the 1962 session in many respects. the major theme was not, however, the evident strains of political alignments which were at the apex of various positions taken during the previous congress. the 1964 session returned to a more traditional discussion of economic development of the province and the pressing problem of intersyndical relations, particularly given the intense raiding practices between the csn and the federation des travailleurs du quebec (ftq). the national question for the csn represented a contradiction in terms of its own political orientation. the two congresses of 1962 and 1964 suggested a measure of autonomy from the federal state, which was not dissimilar from the left-oriented expression within the lesage liberals spearheaded by the levesque faction. the csn's regular yearly memorandum submittted to the federal cabinet was, however, indicative of its own self-perception as a pan-canadian central , concerned with such issues as the nationalization of 73 bell canada, the canadianization of the economy and the opening of relations between canada and the international labour organization (ilo). in the 1964 memorandum, federal/provincial relations were pervasive. the csn discourse offered various approaches toward powershar ing, with greater revenue generating power for the province. also, the immediate need for federal/provincial conferences was stressed. the demands which the csn submitted to the federal cabinet paralleled quite closely the general political debate between the province and ottawa. the larger context within which these appeals were being made was that of a greater alliance between the central's actions and the interests of the provincial form of the state. it is little wonder that in its 1964 memorandum to the cabinet the csn would plunge more deeply into the current centralization/decentralization debate. in a sense, the vicarious quality of the previous memoranda in which the central expressed the concerns of larger regions for greater canadian independence had come to an abrupt halt. le borgne (1976:12) argued that, given the prevailing circumstances of the period, it was inevitable that the militants within the csn as well as the progressive sector of the provincial liberals would share a common ideological framework. this commonality was fixed, amongst other factors, with the emergence of new class fractions in the sphere of unproductive labour which was intent upon pushing forward the reforms of the quiet revolution. perhaps most indicative of this period, for the csn, was a firmly held perception of the state as being in the forefront of the grand notion of common purpose being actively pursued by the lesage liberals. the ftq, in contradistinction to the csn, entered the period of the sixties more inclined toward structural affiliation with a workers' party. certainly this was due in large part to the ftq link with the canadian labour 74 congress, which had already committed itself to the ndp platform. in his introduction to the 1960 convention, the president of the central, roger provost, outlined the ftq perspective toward traditional provincial parties: today we have another new government which has made us new promises and which apparently contains some loyal friends of the working class. we will not change our political outlook however which is non-support for either of the two parties. we must maintain our political orientation all the more because the foremost problem of the hour (which will likely be the major problem of the years to come) is unemployment. there exists not one single example of a political party with a traditional philosophy which has taken effective measures to solve the problem except in times of war. this ideology, or lack of ideology, and the interests they represent mean that the old parties invariably stop in the threshold of real reforms and full employment (ftq, 1960 :4) . perhaps not surprisingly however, on an ideological level (as with the csn) a comparative analysis of various declarations adopted by the ftq in 1959 and the liberal program of 1960 shows little disagreement as to the agenda of proposed reforms. the difference between the ftq and the csn was, however, nonetheless evident above the prerequisites of the modernizing state which they both acknowledged to varying degrees. the main difference was contained in the differing notions of reform held by either central. in the case of the ftq there was a sense of reform which was immersed in a tradition (through structural links with the canadian labour congress as well as the ndp) of addressing the federal form of the state. the csn was, on the other hand, quebec-oriented in its relation with the provincial form of the state, and, to a greater extent, the immediate provincial social formation. the ftq was as well a recipient of two particular types of political mobilization as expressed by its predecessors, the federation provinciale des travailleurs du quebec (fptq) and the federation des unions industrielles du quebec (fuiq). 5 in this regard, the fptq had a "bread and butter 75 orientation" and favoured structural links with the ccf/ndp political apparatus. the fuiq advocated direct workers' action and was often behind the organizational attempts to create separate working class parties within the province. ^ the ideological gulf between these two factions was no doubt considerable at the time of the merger. the newly formed ftq, over and above these traditions, found itself immediately ensnarled by the nature of the working class struggles which were increasingly being enacted upon the provincial stage. this situation, in purely political terms, was further complicated by the active nurturing of the ftq's shaky alliance with the ndp by the provincial liberals who utilized the pact to justify excluding the ftq from an organizational slice of the growing public and para-public pie. the conditions facing the ftq were therefore: (a) the growth of the quebec state and the concomitant isolation of the ftq from the political arena, while participating in the reformist practices of the state and (b) the inability of the ftq to institute a viable arm of the ndp within the province to represent the political form they so clearly sought. both of these aspects were related to the new historic emergence of the national question. the isolation of the ftq should in this sense be appraised equally through the growing importance of the csn. the csn incidentally faced none of the two above conditions as acutely as did the ftq. roback (1973) has argued similarly that, given the decline of efficiency by the international unions (as represented by the ftq) and confronted with the more effective structure of the csn, the ftq was less adept in maintaining a collective front in its various struggles with the state. ' 76 the quiet revolution: a summary aside from representing a period of considerable growth in the composition of the working classes within quebec, 1960 to 1965 was an equally important time in the development of a modernizing petite bourgeoisie. this juncture is best characterized by its reformist participation and appropriation of class interests through the exigencies of the modernizing state. to a certain extent, these factors provided the background for the articulation of a type of working class nationalism immersed in a transformist pact with the state. nationalism for the working classes of 1960 to 1965 was in this sense primarily, but not solely, of a structural design given the conditions of a changing class structure and modernization of state apparatuses. in the case of the ftq, this was translated into a process of integration of its class interests with a more defined territorial perspective. accordingly, the format of nationalism in the ftq during this period was removed to some degree from the cultural claims of the quiet revolution. 8 this was less the case in the csn which was well implicated as a spokesperson for the working classes. its structural problem resided, however, in the absence of a defined political approach particularly given marchand's earlier guidelines. it was precisely these types of conditions, in both centrals, which would intertwine the political nature of working class interests in the then emerging petit bourgeois political and social agenda. 1966 to 1976: the growth of the repressive state while the early sixties was a period in which working class organizations were adjusting to their own structural incapacities, 1966 to 1976 presented a more complex configuration. the conclusion of the quiet revolution found the 77 syndical movement within quebec in a particularly fragile position. the dynamism of the period created the conditions for union participation in a series of state mechanisms such as the soci6te gsnerale de financement (sgf), the caisse de depots et de placement, and l'office de planification. cracks in the social momentum were, however, beginning to appear. this was evident in the absence of cohesion amongst the new factions in power. technocratic attempts to further the gains of nationalist ideologies conflicted with a neo-capitalist faction which was content with the structural changes already achieved. the program of the technocratic faction was finding political expression in the left of the liberal party and, eventually, in the mouvement souverainete association. the developments influencing the csn and the ftq during this juncture can be concretely typified by (a) a substantial change in the composition of union membership given the public sector expansion; (b) the defeat of the liberal regime and (c) the increasing conflict between the centrals and the state, which had already begun in the final year of the lesage mandate. the last point is particularly pertinent, given the acquiescence of the two centrals toward state decisions throughout the early sixties. mascotto and soucy argue that the prevailing interests and forms of nationalism reminiscent of the social bloc identified with the quiet revolution had reached the frontiers of its own capacity for change (1979:107). this capacity entailed the contextual framework of reformism which, for the centrals could no longer maintain the types of policies they were increasingly advocating. mascotto and soucy refer to some of these stillborn policies as a substantially watered-down hospital insurance plan, slow progression in educational reform and unsatisfactory reforms to the labour code. this last point elicited a strong reaction from the syndical movement which resulted in a march upon the quebec legislative assembly. 78 these failures of the quiet revolution were certainly at the base of disenchantment with the liberal regime. however, as mascotto and soucy point out, instead of retreating to the classic posture of working class organizations (i.e. a greater inward emphasis upon syndical organization during periods of crisis), the two centrals utilized the social dynamic of the period to develop a radical view of social forces in the larger society. certainly, given the nature of discourse during the period, this seems to have been the case. in one sense, the radicalization of the two centrals from the mid-sixties could be seen within the context of an absence of any other form of political organization firmly entrenched in the popular masses. as a consequence of this situation, the centrals became, by necessity, the sole polarized formation for working class grievances. these circumstances were not only operative for the then current plethora of social questions (given the trauma of economic and compositional changes with the working classes), but the centrals also took upon themselves another function. this role was to act as a repository for various class interests on the national question while attempting to clarify its own voice. in 1966, the unionized working class in quebec was composed of 540,000 persons, 35% of the active labour force. of this number, 35,000 belonged to the centrale de l'enseignement du quebec (ceq), 150,000 adhered to the ftq (out of 350,000 members of the international unions) and 200,000 belonged to the csn. table 2 shows this distribution over a 17 year period: table 2: union affiliation of working class in quebec over a seventeen year period 1960 1966 1976 1977 ceq 28,000 55,000 70,000 80,000 csn 94,000 200,000 245,000 200,000 ftq 100,000 150,000 230,000 260,000 source: document de travail, centre de formation populaire 79 the political ascendancy of daniel johnson's union nationale in 1966 was marked by a changed relationship between the centrals and the state. during the lesage regime, the fruits of neo-gomperism blossomed from legislation favourable to the then perceived interests of working classes. the various projets de lois were seen by virtue of successful, however intense, lobbying efforts as geared toward the interests of the collectivity. this was uniformly the case, as both centrals were active participants in state reform regardless of the level of recalcitrant rhetoric, particularly on the part of the ftq. during the johnson regime, we begin to see a division wherein the state uses its ideological appratuses to distinguish the public interest from those of the centrals. johnson saw the role of the state in more coercive terms than his predecessor, and certainly this is borne out by the regressive labour legislation which he helped to enact. the johnson and bertrand regimes (1966-1970) were, on the whole, less entrenched in the particular composition of social forces which typified the lesage period. the union nationale represented a rear—guard reaction to the changes which had occurred during the quiet revolution, particularly the acquisition of greater powers from the federal state. it should be stressed, however, that the un did follow through on various projects of the lesage liberals, particularly educational reform. in fact, once in power, the un became a strong advocate of provincial autonomy. the lesser reliance which the johnson/bertrand regimes initially placed upon state intervention in the economy is evident from a comparison of expenditures with the previous lesage government. latouche's inquiry (1976:167) into the area of expenditure during these periods has yielded some interesting results. he found that 80 from 1960 total expenditure by the quebec government rose steadily, reaching a significant increase of 29% in 1965 over the year before (in constant dollars). during the first year of the johnson government, expenditures rose by only 9.6%. there was an elevation of 13.7% in 1967. each following year, expenditure rose less than 10%. in 1970, expenditures decreased by 0.3% in constant dollars. the above figures can be used to explain the political and social prerequisites of class forces represented by the un. these were regional interests which were less tied to the expanding technocracy of the state. however, given the new structural composition of the centrals (particularly of the csn, 50% of whose members were in the public and para-public sector) it was clear that the centrals and the state were on a collision course. there were, of course, other relevant factors for this situation. the 42nd congress of the csn in 1966 was indicative of the growing militancy of the central vis-a-vis the state. it was the first congress chaired by the new president, marcel pepin. pepin expressed clearly the disappointments of the previous years for the working classes in quebec. these observations were put forward mostly in terms of the full political weight of quebec in provincial matters to counteract the imbalance in economic development. the imbalance to which pepin was referring was most evident in the levels of unemployment throughout the province. these levels remained consistently higher than the national average. the moral report of 1966, a society built for man , addressed various issues. to a great extent, the monograph called for a democratization of the workplace as well as a rationalization of the economy. these issues were not very different from the views expressed in previous presidential reports. this, however, was the period during which the csn had just completed its 81 first round of negotiations with the state for salary policies in the public sector. the effects of these negotiations were evident in the report. pepin left little doubt as to the new perspective of the central toward the state: conrme employeur le gouvernement provinciale ou ses agences se sont revelss parfois au moins aussi durs que l'entreprise privge.. les difficultes que nous avons rencontrses a 1' hydro par exemple, sont de ce nombre. nous comprenons mal que l'etat puisse copier les mgthodes les plus mauvaises des entreprises priv§es ou plutfit nous croyons le comprendre trop bien; il nous est apparu assez clalrement au cours de plusieurs de nos n&gociations avec l'etat oil avec ses agences a la regie des alcools, par exemple oil a l'hydro, que ces nsgociations se d§roulaient sous l'oeil vigilant des grands inte're'ts privss et que ceux-ci n'entendaient pas voir le gouvernement adopter a l'egard de la main-d'oeuvre plus sociales que celles dont eux-memes etaient disposes a faire preuve envers leurs propre employes (csn, 1966:16). there remained, however, a contradiction regarding the outlook of the csn toward the state, one which would continue for years. this contradiction rested upon the recognition that the state, as a vigilant employer, was no more or less favourably disposed to the working classes than the private sector, and the state as ...that which must intervene and not leave economic domain to big capitalism. it (the state) must reassert its preeminence.' within the csn, the image of the state acquired two faces, a perception shared by a rising petite bourgeoisie attempting to convince the regional bourgeoisie of the validity of its political project. this duality consisted of: (a) a dynamic structure whose interventionist quality had been muted and (b) a structure favourably annexed to the interests of big capital. the view of the state as a dynamic structure was in keeping with the developing hegemony of nationalist ideological elements within the general sphere of class formations. struggles to revive the dynamism of state intervention in the economy and to remold the dialogue between labour and the state were at the base of this perception by the central. often, the struggles of labour 82 and the concerns of the new petit bourgeois acquired very concrete forms. this certainly was the case in the now famous cbc strike to affiliate with the csn, which the canada labour relations board refused to accredit. the state's favourable disposition to big capital again coincided with new petit bourgeois struggles against the prevalence of monopoly capital intrusion. its interests lay in the encouragement of indigenous capital of a non-monopolistic character, which is not to suggest that the interests of these two classes were concurrent. they were not. the central's perspective of capital and the state were often confrontational by their inherent class nature. this was not the case with the new petite bourgeoisie. however, what did cause a collusion of interests was the lack of a viable instrument of political expression by the working classes during a period of intense petit bourgeois mobilization. this mobilization was centered precisely on the national question which had at its very heart a quest for state power. the csn remained, in this regard, a receptacle of latent political class interests with no legitimate ideological or practical channel. these interests were to find expression within the political project of a new emerging social bloc, which utilized the ideology of neo-nationalism as a motor for its vision of quebec society. the ftq was more immersed in the federal/provincial debates than its counterpart in quebec. the general council report in 1967 outlined the official position of the ftq regarding the emerging constitutional question. the report refers to the brief submitted by the csn/ftq and the union des cultivateurs catholique (ucc) to the constitution committee of the quebec legislative assembly. in that brief, the ftq rejected a series of propositions aimed at resolving the constitutional crisis. the options objected to were: (a) an independent quebec, (b) associate states, (c) the 83 status quo, and (d) greater centralization under the federal government. in lieu of the above, the central proposed a federal system adapted to present-day realities and entailing a greater state role for quebec. it should be noted that the general council's report occurred during a year in which the national question was quite topical within the central. it is not surprising that, given the differences amongst various factions within the ftq, the central's official proposal should remain so vague. the congress did not, however, come out strongly against separatism. in a repeat of laberge's monologue of 1965, nationalism cum separatism was described as a bourgeois ideology that would ultimately reduce the standard of living of workers. at the same convention a resolution was passed, however, which acknowledged the right of autodetermination of the french canadian homeland .including, if necessary, the right of secession. this indicated the enduring strength of the fuiq tradition, as well as the divided opinion within the central itself. regardless of the divisions, the official position called for a revised federalism through the growth of provincial state power: we would, without any inconvenience reduce the preponderant place of the federal government in certain fields. certain material that jurisprudence has declared to be under federal jurisdiction should come under joint control such as radio and television (rapport de conseil general, 1967:6). surely, the ftq was reacting to a complex series of events. given the various ideological stances within the central, the ftq sought a middle ground. in this regard, while having adopted a left inspired analysis of quebec society, it also articulated what was seen by many militant nationalists as a conservative approach toward federalism. the central's position in the report to the quebec assembly satisfied for the moment both tendencies, as it contained a strong affirmation of a greater role for the provincial state on the language issue. 84 the substance of political action was once again assessed at the 1967 congress. suggestions were put forward to organize with other progressive groups in quebec and an exploratory conference toward unification of left-wing political forces in a provincial party was proposed. the irony of the suggestion must have weighed heavily upon militants, given the earlier failure of the parti socialiste du quebec (psq). the report stressed the need for local union affiliation with the ndp. resolution six stated: ...that the ftq reiterate its intention to give its moral and material support to a provincial political party when it is required in the interest of workers, and when it is sure that there is a provincial party whose program and structures offer both in terms of ideology and integrity the same guarantees as the ndp-q presently offers in federal politics (rapport de conseil general, 1967:6). as well as being a turning point for the central, laberge's opening speech at the 1969 convention revealed much ambiguity. it was obvious by now that the great project of 1967 (to rally progressive forces in quebec to create a new party) had not materialized and laberge's statement reads like an indictment of the ftq at having been "taken over by events." he addressed the seeming inability of the ftq to implicate itself in progressive struggles outside of the union movement. clearly, this speech was directed at the increasing impatience of militants within the central to clarify a political approach. the essence of the convention, as the title of the speech, "operation collective searching," indicated, was more than a reformulation of the inadequacies of political representation of the working class in quebec. rather, it was an affirmation that a new approach was needed. this was evident, given the realization of the difficulty of sustaining an ndp-q presence in the province as well as the taking-up of the mantle of social democracy by the parti quebecois. in this context, he made no mention of the creation of a new party but, rather, urged the ftq to re-examine its response to the large issues of the day. 85 the 1969 address was a harbinger of the type of political appropriation which would occur by the early seventies. through its hegemonic regrouping of nationalist forces, the pq had, in a very broad sense, acquired at least the appearance of the social democratic party for which the ftq had hoped, for so long. radlcalization and reform the decade of the seventies was initiated by the return of the provincial liberal party. the privileged relationship that the csn had maintained with the party during the sixties had been dramatically altered, given the departure of the pq, its progressive wing. during the preceding four years, the union nationale had enlarged the role of the state in industrial relations, restricting union gains made during the first half of the decade. the liberal party had in mind, no doubt, a further expansion of this aspect of the state, given their incoming platform of industrial peace. the first half of the seventies was a crucial period for the re-definition of syndical goals for both centrals. it was during this time frame that we see a significant change in the outlook within the csn/ftq towards the entire question of nationalism. the period of 1970-76 was also marked by a more official movement by the two centrals towards the parti quebecols. the 44th congress of the csn in 1970 stressed the need to eliminate the political vacuum which existed in the province. the atmosphere surrounding the convention was ripe for manifestation of solidarity amongst the various centrals and diverse political groupings. this was the period of the war measures act. as a display of unity against the acquiescence of the bourassa regime in the face of severe federal actions, the csn, ftq and ceq formed the first united front against the military occupation of the province. the 86 natural party ongoing to counteract the repressive military action, was the pq. the urgency of the political moment was not, however, the only aspect binding various class forces of the period. the 44th congress was also the occasion upon which the csn called for an affirmation of the unilingual nature of quebec, curiously rejecting, however, the application of this principle within the central itself. the 1971 ftq document, political action crossroads , summed up the magnitude of conflicting influences to which the central was subject. the committee begins by examining the reason why the political orientation of the central, adopted at the 1967 convention, never rallied support amongst workers. their conclusion was that support for the new democratic party of quebec (ndp-q) was premature. workers were not sufficiently educated to accept this type of labour militancy. the problem lay with the fact that the political education of the working class had been provided by the traditional parties. the idea of politics for the working classes was one which was identified as a "dirty but essential thing which calls for our vote every four years" (ftq, 1971:136). the above assessment of the political action committee was quite remarkable and perhaps attests more to the ideological disarray within the central than to the actual political education of the workers. certainly, by 1971, the ftq had already given its implicit support to the parti quebecois. within the rank and file, the party had done amazingly well in securing a large base over a very short period of time. the question was clearly not to educate the worker away from the crass political attitudes of the traditional parties but, rather, to offer an alternative to a party which was ideologically capable of winning the working class. the committee did suggest the integration of working class representatives in various extraneous organizations, most importantly, 87 municipal and school board elections. they also advocated a greater syndical support role for those workers who did engage in independent political action: up to now those organized workers who have been elected at the municipal and school board level were left to their own means. we should not be surprised if after some time those individuals hold views close to those of the middle classes and the financial elites than the working classes (ftq, 1971:139). the manifestos the well-known 1971 manifestos, ne comptons que sur nos propres moyens by the csn and l'etat rouage de notre exploitation by the ftq, were major articulations of the socialism/nationalism dialectic which was gaining ground in the centrals. both manifestos were illustrative of several facets of the national question within the two centrals. primarily, the documents clearly separated the economic and social contexts from the dominant cultural context of the period. relationships were not posed in quebecois and anglo canadian terms, but in terms of the exploitative effect of capital upon the labouring classes: the point, is not to engage in leftist activism of a particular tendency but to begin an authentic return to the trade union movement's grass roots, that is to forget the verbal battles especially the purely nationalist ones and to plunge into the very heart of a struggle against the exploitation of workers by capitalists (csn, 1972:159) the attempt to keep the two issues separate subjected the centrals to much criticism from various left nationalist coalitions. it was clear that centrals had taken a distinct stand regarding working class priorities outside the realm of culturally motivated concerns. 38 while proposing a socialist definition of society, the csn was particularly restrained in offering an examination of the role of state agencies. this was quite remarkable, given the popularity of state expansion in many sectors of the economy. the csn approach to the economy was encapsulated in its call for the nationalization of sectors controlled by american capital. the ftq proposal was qualitatively different. it saw the extension of state agencies as a solution to various indicators of class struggle, most notably unemployment: our first collective tool is the economic power of the state of quebec. the state should be the only agency able to direct the use of everyone's savings, competence and initiative toward the creation of a real instrument of collective economic liberation. the first task facing trade unionism and the people of quebec is that of involving the state in economic activity and specifying the modalities of this action: (a) participation in the economy through the strengthening of government agencies; (b) the use of peoples' savings for collective purposes (ftq, 1972:183) both of the documents stressed that the territorial prerequisite of quebec was inextricable from the condition of the working class. however, the vagueness of their social project during some very crucial political moments created much room for the appropriation of consent within the labour movement. in effect, the two organizations were radicalizing workers in terms of their objective class position but they were not offering the necessary political dimension needed to express those interests. this was most evident during the debate within the centrals concerning the implications of the manifestos. while the movement was debating the consequences of determined class action of a progressive nature, it was similarly aligning itself with a reformist approach reminiscent of the early sixties. 89 sumnary: an absence of options the perspective of the ftq, although similar to the csn in that it offered no clear alternative to the political morass of the times, went somewhat further. this may have been due to the tradition of commitment to a party sympathetic to the working class, coupled with the repressive state mechanisms during the bourassa regime. the 1975 convention of the ftq (a year before the provincial election) saw an unprecedented shift by a quebec central toward a major party. the move, in strategic terms, was meant to plant workers in the party. a similar rationale was used by f. daoust of the former parti socialiste de quebec as well as the conseil centrale de montreal of the csn, in the early seventies. the opening speech of the president of the ftq on the eve of a new political arrangement within the province was particularly illuminating. the official line of the ftq, particularly when it came to laberge, was to relegate any nationalist rhetoric to the sideline. in no uncertain terms, however, the address was a capitulation to the various pressures within the central for a greater implication in the pq's social project. laberge situated the ftq in terms of the party, stressing that the pq was not a worker's coalition but could still constitute a channel of change. it was, laberge argued, a challenge workers should accept. in 1974 as well as during the special congress in 1975, the csn echoed the same type of movement toward the social platform of the pq, but with considerably less official aplomb than the ftq. though coming from different inclinations and strategies, both centrals were involving themselves in the form of mainstream nationalism in the crucial year prior to the pq victory in 1976. both used essentially the same rationale in the appropriation of their consent. in terms of the developing hegemony, the securing of a stable social base seemed at hand. 90 the parti quebecois and the referendum the election of the parti quebecois in 1976 was a welcome relief for the labour movement in quebec. over and above the vision of a sympathetic party which many workers saw in the pq, the direction of the working class vote was clearly anti-bourassa. interestingly, the researcher investigating this period, intent upon finding material within the centrals related to the national question, comes up against a wall of relative silence. the absence of dialogue was broken earlier by the csn in 1978 and followed hesitatingly by the ftq in 1979 and, more forcefully, a month prior to the referendum in 1980. given the earlier recalcitrant tone of the '71 manifestos implying a socialist vision of quebec society, the lack of position papers, resolutions, etc, was certainly significant. the paucity of analysis within the centrals was indicative of a sceptical "wait and see" attitude exercised by the csn and the ftq towards the new party in power. the absence of an official line by the centrals was, however, not indicative of the substance of debate amongst the militants. at the 1977 congress of the ftq, we do see a developing opposition to the ftq's acquiescent relationship with the pq. this opposition called for syndical unity and the creation of a true workers' party to offset the influence of the pq amongst the working classes. quite apart from these distancing attempts (which were consistently stronger in the csn), it was the mobilization of the new petit bourgeois strategies for the referendum which ultimately motivated the enlivening of debate in both centrals. to a certain extent, it was once more the political which became a factor in class relations. whereas the political moment had appropriated class elements earlier in the parti quebecois' formation and later victory, it became (through the referendum testing, so to speak) the parameters of the existing hegemony. 91 the 49th congress of the csn, held in 1978, had much to resolve. the preceding two years of pq government had shown significantly less promise than the workers' movement had hoped for. the rapport du comite d'orientation was reflective of the need to extrapolate the significance of the national question for the central. the report, published a full two years prior to the referendum, made no mention of the approaching plebiscite. in part, the document represented a clarification of the socialist project enunciated in the 1971 manifesto. it was, however, more clearly directed at the preceding two years of pq rule. the working paper was indicative of the ending of a very disturbing two years of consensual integration. the terms of consent were based upon a disorganization of the working classes, as bill 45 had illustrated. the bill offered a mixed bag of reform and repression which tended to polarize factions within the working classes themselves. it would seem that this is inherent in a process of consensual integration, which incorporates a dialectic but is concretized in terms of the demobilization (in this case of a political type) of class interests. the rapport du comit§ d'orientation was an attempt to address this type of hegemonic process by squarely situating workers' interests on the ideological battleground of the parti quebecois, i.e., the national question. the conditions of the debate, as the document state, were to be found in the efforts of political parties and associations to woo workers to their particular view of the nation. the paper argued that working people of all sectors in quebec were threatened by bill 45, as well as by federal legislation dealing with the economic crisis. it then became essential for workers to analyse the national question within the context of capitalist exploitation. the national question, like the state, the paper continued, 92 could not be seen in neutral terms, i.e., it takes on the form of the dominant class relationship: les partis politiques ont des representations differentes de la realite canadienne et qugbecoise, et cela en fonction des intsrsts qu'ils dependent; lis ont pourtant en commun d'utiliser le concept de nation (canadienne ou quebecoise) pour masquer le9 rapports d'exploitation qui sont le fondement msme de la societe capitaliste (rapport du comite d'orientation, csn, 1978:5). the relationship between the pq and the csn was examined in some detail by the report. the document recalls the support of the csn in the 1976 election. its own studies indicated that 60% of all organized workers voted for the pequistes (pq), with 15% going to the liberal party. in the anglophone sector, it was the working classes which voted pq, (33.3% of anglophone workers under the age of 35 voted for the pq as opposed to 22% who voted liberal.) the interim between the 1978 congress and special congress on the national question in 1979 saw two position papers by the csn. the first of these, proposition de la csn pour la discussion sur la question nationale , approached the large question of stimulating debate within the popular classes. this working paper, as many before it, had clearly defined its intervention as that of a union composed of workers who hold many differing ideas, opinions and ideologies: what binds us together are our common interests as workers and the resultant desire to formulate together and have implemented the changes needed to defend and transform our working and living conditions (csn, 1979:6). the mode of intervention, the document argues, must address cultural, economic, social and political consequences of oppression. this is to be done while maintaining its autonomy from any particular umbrella organization within each camp which "may bring together business and political groupings whose intersts are diametrically opposed to those of the workers" (csn, 93 1979:42). in a sense, lacking its own political mechanism, the csn was outlining the many pitfalls ahead for itself. it would seem that the central had underestimated the pervasiveness of the pq as well as federalist dominance in the debate. the central proposed equal time for labour groups and popular organizations in the various forms of the media. little of this occurred. it is not surprising that the side with which the csn had so hoped to avoid affiliating had already chosen. the paper argues that the election of the parti quebecois (over and above the disappointments) was esentially a positive development for the working classes, as it opened up the debate for the real issue of national oppression, which must be posed by the popular classes. it would seem from resolutions 21 and 22 of the 1979 working paper, that the central was again ready to afford the party its strategic accord: it is proposed that the csn resolutely engage in the debate to determine if it should decide in favour of the people of quebec exercising their right to self-determination, that is the right of the people of quebec to freely choose its political status including independence and to ensure freely its political, social and cultural development . it is proposed that the csn recognize that this struggle against national oppression may necessitate the independence of quebec (resolution 21, 22, csn, 1979:40). the 1979 brochure, la csn et la question nationale , was a strategic working paper focusing upon the exact nature of entry into the political debate: it is the common interest of workers beyond the working environment which makes union intervention in the national question a necessity (csn, 1979:10). however, the union's goals regarding its entry into the political debate were seen to be significantly different from that of political parties. in this sense, ...a political party's basic goal is to get into or stay in power and whose members join on the basis of a common platform or ideology (csn, 1979:11). 94 from the csn's view of the party , it was obvious that it had not yet sharpened its understanding of the class dynamic of political and social relations within the province. the ftq: the politics of nationalism the ftq entered the referendum debate at a relatively late date. the parameters of its discourse were evident during its 16th annual convention in 1979. at that convention the parti quebecois was singled out as being a "hesitant harbinger of change." yet it was this party which had "proposed a political project which would have a determinant effect upon the collective future of the working class" (ftq, 1979:2). the tone of the congress suggested caution. the president's inaugural speech asserted that the ftq would have to examine its response to the national question very carefully, particularly given the hasty resolutions occurring over this matter in the csn. as did the various csn documents before it, the 16th ftq convention enumerated the drawbacks of the pq performance, given their previous selection promises. as well, the csn position taken at its 1978 congress regarding the national question was roundly criticized. in this context, laberge argued that the csn had avoided an analysis of the national question from a distinctively labour viewpoint. in reference to the csn interpretation, laberge argued: it is indeed, starting from a renewed vision that we will be able to tackle the difficult national issue from a true labour perspective. there is no question of a sort of flight forward , of skipping the national issue debate behind a project for society . quite the contrary, we must conduct two rather separate debates: one on the national issue and the other on our project for a society. whatever approach we may follow on this national issue and whatever future quebecers will decide for themselves at the constitutional level, the ftq must continue the fight for the implementation of its project for society (ftq, 1979:22-23). 95 having determined che distinction between the two issues, the president's speech outlined the ftq's "project for quebec society'. this project of democratic socialism stressed increased control of the community over its natural resources, key industries and management of the economy. the president's enunciation of the social and economic policy of the ftq, although not dissimilar from earlier statements, shed a particular light upon a then prevalent perception of the national question. in previous ftq documents, the same type of analysis had been put forward, but suggesting a distinct relationship between the national issue and class struggle. often this relationship was posed within the context of the centralizing/decentralizing debate. this was still in marked distinction to the csn documents of the early seventies, which many readers had interpreted as an implicit nationalist stance. given the approaching referendum, the ftq, as was obvious through the 1979 convention, had little choice but to address the linkages. the csn and the ftq: variations in response the affirmative responses of the csn and the ftq to the referendum differed. the csn position has been referred to within the labour movement as being largely the "yes critique'. on the other hand, the ftq response has been colloquially called the "unconditional yes'.^ the disparity between the two centrals can be attributed to various factors. primarily, the ftq tradition of support for parties sympathetic to working class interests brought it relatively closer to a form of political integration by the dominant nationalist forces within the seventies. as well, by 1980, the ftq had given up hope tor the mdp-0 and, instead, continued their tumultuous relationship with the 96 parti quebecois. but the ftq's articulation of nationalism concentrated upon distancing themselves from the pq platform throughout the debate. principally, this was done by approaching the question from a detached labour standpoint, and by isolating the national issue as a tactical manoeuvre. this type of strategy failed, given: (a) the overwhelming desire of the membership to see their central act as a podium for enunciating workers' interests within the debate and (b) the general effect of the mainstream nationalist debate, and its overlapping characteristic vis-a-vis working class nationalism. the csn had no such ideological attachment towards supporting a party sympathetic to working class interests — the csn relationship with the lesage liberals could hardly be seen in this light. this situation may well have been the reason for its more critical stance in the face of the pq. the csn and the ftq both displayed different backgrounds endemic to a constitutional outlook. the ftq was well entrenched in the federal/provincial debate; its own relationship with the ctc in many ways mimicking the larger ottawa/quebec conflict. the csn had no such tradition, outside of once considering itself, in theory anyhow, a pan-canadian central, with a yearly submission of briefs to the federal cabinet. in a sense, as i have mentioned, the csn was more implicated and perhaps more prepared historically to interlock the national question with its struggle for a socialist program. conclusion what i have tried to show in this paper is the utility of employing a class-based analysis to explain the internal articulation of interests around the national question within a relatively homogeneous ethnic setting. in 97 this respect, the paradigmatic application of a structural marxism is not without its difficulties. i suggest there is a need to further develop approaches which treat inter-class relations and characteristics through an examination of the political implications of these factors. this must be done in the context of assessing the political realization of specific classes . in an application of various theoretical guidelines, particularly those of gramsci, i have examined the political manifestations of these inter-class occurrences. the analysis of the csn and the ftq has addressed a series of processes: the transformist periods of 1960-65 and 1966-75 were distinguished by certain structural conditions which formed the foundation (in consentful as well as coercive terms) of the union central/state relationship. the association between the labour centrals and the parti quebecois from 1976 onwards was distinguished by an expansive dialectic which mobilized the working class within a political project which was entirely outside their sphere of influence. the varied conditions and circumstances outlined in this paper have prompted both centrals in recent years (particularly the csn) to reassess their method of political intervention. notes 1. indeed, hobsbawm (1977) states that marx did begin an analysis of political theory particularly in reference to hegel's philosophy of law. this effort was abandoned, however, in favour of a political economy approach which, for marx, was the "anatomy of civil society." in fact, hobsbawm maintains that "the materialist conception of history actually discouraged the study of politics and the state as autonomous subjects — except in the crucial field of the state and revolution." see "gramsci and marxist political theory" in approaches to gramsci , ed., anne showstack sassoon, writers and readers publishing cooperative society ltd., london, england, 1981. 2. it is noteworthy that much of the actual political arguments which were dominant in marx's era were concerned with the issue of unification. the same concern for unification and its class implication was to be a continuing point of contention which overshadowed the debate between luxembourg and lenin. 98 3. this idea is picked up by j.h. ehrenreich. he argues that "...nationalism leads not towards socialism but towards the integration of working class into the capitalist system and towards the integration of the less developed countries into the capitalist work marketplace." (john h. ehrenreich, "socialism, nationalism and capitalist development" in review of radical political economics , vol. xv, no. 1, spring, 1983.) 4. s. hall, b. lumley and g. mclennan argue that for gramsci it is the purely political moment that marks the passage from the structure to the sphere of the complex superstructure. ("politics and ideology, gramsci" in on ideology , centre for contemporary cultural studies, hutchinson of london, 1978). 5. both the fptq and the fuiq merged in 1957 to form the ftq. 6. many prominent members of the then defunct fuiq, such as fernand daoust, were involved in the creation of the parti socialiste du quebec (psq). 7. it was precisely this drawback, i.e. that the ftq was simply not as entrenched a central as the csn, due to its reliance upon the clc to ratify its decisions, which precipitated a certain crisis of identity leading to an internal struggle for greater autonomy from the parent body. 8. it should be pointed out, however, that both centrals addressed the question of french language rights in the workplace during this period. 9. this was particularly clear given the report's approval of such state agencies as the general investment corporation. see "a society built for man," csn, 1966. 10. yvon charbonneau discusses the significance of these two affirmative responses in relation to the position of the centrale de l'enseignement du quebec (ceo) in his article "d'octobre 1970 a octobre 1980" in l'impasse: enjeux et perspectives de l'apres referendum, ed. nicole laurin-frenette and jean-francois leonard, les editions nouvelle optique, 1980. references black rose collective 1972 quebec labour , montreal: black rose books. bloom, s.f. 1941 the world of nations: a study of the national implications in the world of karl marx , new york: columbia university press. centre de formation populaire 1978 la question nationale, un defi a relever pour le mouvement ouvrier , montreal: centre de formation populaire. 99 centre for contemporary cultural studies 1977 "politics and ideology: gramsci," by stuart hall, bob lumley and gregor mclennan, in on ideology , london, hutchinson. davis, horace b. 1967 nationalism and socialism , new york: monthly review press. drache, daniel 1972 quebec — only the beginning, manifestos of the common front , toronto. gramsci, antonio 1971 the prison notebooks , eds. quinton hoare and geoffrey noweil smith, london: lawrence and wishart. haupt, georges; lowy , michel & weill, claudie 1974 les marxistes et la question nationale 1848-1914 , montreal: editions d'etincelle. hobsbawm, eric 1977 "some reflections on the break-up of britain," new left review , no. 105, september. leborgne, louis 1976 la c.s.n, et la question nationale depuis 1960 . montreal: editions albert st. martin. lenin, v.i. 1965 "question of national policy and proletarian internationalism," collected works , moscow: progress publishers. marx, karl 1964 ireland and the irish questions , new york: new world paperbacks. mascotto, jacques; soucy, pierre yves 1979 sociologie politique de la question nationale . editions cooperatives albert st. martin. nairn, tom 1981 the break-up of britain , london: verso. roback, leo 1973 "les formes historique de politisation du syndicalisme au quebec in g. dion, ed. la politisation des relations du travail ou&bec , quebec: les presses de l'universite laval. thaler, henri 1984 nationalism and the working class: a study of two union centrals of quebec , m.a. thesis, department of sociology, carleton university. union documentation proces verbal de la quarantisme session de congres de la csn , 1962. 100 prcces verbal de la quarante-et-une session de congres de la csn , 1964. a society built for man , moral report of the csn, 1966. positions , csn publication, 1968. political action crossroads , 1971. general resolution for the defence of the working men and women interests, in the struggle against national opression of the quebecois people , csn, 1977. proposition de la csn pour la discussion sur la question nationale . csn, 1977 union documentation fto officers report submitted to the 5th convention of the ftq , 1960. officers report submitted to the 6th convention of the ftq , 1961. inaugural speech of the president, ninth congress , 1965. opening speech of the president, target and speared , ftq, 14th congress, 1975. the ftq and the national question , 1979. 101 crisis and opportunism | 33 crisis and opportunism: public finance trends from stimulus to austerity in canada — christopher stoney and tamara krawchenko1 with crisis comes uncertainly and with it, opportunity. this has certainly characterized responses to the 2007 economic crises and its aftermath. in the early days of the crisis, economists and the neoclassical model alike were battered with contempt from internal and external criticism (nadeau, 2008). even the staunchly neoliberal magazine, the economist, briefly declared the death of neoclassical economics—only to rectify and defend it in its subsequent issue. leading up to the 2007 economic crisis, there had been a movement within economics to question market fundamentalist logic and the increasingly divorced-fromreality mathematical models that had come to define the profession (williams & mcneill, 2005, p.3). neoclassical economics and its bedfellow, neoliberalism, has dominated public policy for so long that its widespread critique since the most recent economic crisis has led to speculation that we are witnessing a paradigm shift. our review of canadian federal public policy and expenditures finds that there has been no such significant or sustained shift and the economic crisis and resulting federal stimulus expenditures have done little to reorient the dominance of neoliberal policy in canada. indeed by 2012 talk of a paradigm shift or significant realignment in the neoliberal consensus had largely evaporated. 1 christopher stoney is associate professor in the school of public policy and administration, director of the centre for urban research and education at carleton university, and co-editor of how ottawa spends. his research interests include infrastructure funding, municipal government and urban sustainability. tamara krawchenko is assistant professor in political science at dalhousie university. her current research focuses on rural community and economic development in the atlantic provinces. 34 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism using powerful imagery, harvie and milburn (2011) epitomize the sense of despair felt by many towards neoliberalism’s seemingly inexorable march: “neoliberalism no longer “makes sense”, but its logic keeps stumbling on, without conscious direction, like a zombie: ugly, persistent and dangerous. such is the “unlife” of a zombie, a body stripped of its goals, unable to adjust itself to the future, unable to make plans. it can only act habitually as it pursues a monomaniacal hunger” (harvie and milburn, 2011). in order to illuminate aspects of the return to ‘business as usual,’ the paper focuses on telling the story of stimulus and austerity in canada by examining federal government expenditures from 2006 onwards using public accounts data (fiscal years 2005-2011). we highlight how the crisis (and the way it was presented) provided opportunities for the harper government to deliver strategic shifts in priorities and spending. in particular, we focus in on the two biggest ministerial portfolio ‘winners’ over this period –the ministries of transport (namely, the department of infrastructure canada) and natural resources. rather than initiating a change in thinking amongst the policy elites we see a continuation, if not a heightening of existing ‘growth-first’ priorities. for canada, this has included a focus on supporting a natural resource driven export economy in support of a political commitment to economic expansion, wealth creation and employment. canada’s stimulus response to the economic crisis can be seen to have been consistent with the harper government’s overall approach of “open federalism,” the two major tenets of which are: smaller government (“keeping the federal government’s spending power within bounds”) and adherence to the constitutional divisions of powers (“respecting areas of provincial jurisdiction” (pm of canada, 2006). significantly, compared to many other countries, the size of canada’s stimulus measures were relatively small (ccpa, 2009, p.2) and much of it focused on tax cuts and some infrastructure spending in which funding contributions from other levels of government were required. harmes argues that ‘open federalism’ is consistent with a “broader neoliberal approach to federalism which, among other aims, seeks to use institutional reforms to lock in more market-oriented public policies” (2007, p.418). of interest in the areas of natural resources and trade is how public policy has promoted an energy-based export agenda—a continuation and yet, new manifestation of harold innis’ staples theory crisis and opportunism | 35 of canadian development (innis, 1956). here, open federalism’s tenets are somewhat relaxed, as the federal government takes a strong interest in resource extraction and the development of infrastructure to support canada’s export markets – areas of major government expenditure and intervention in provincial affairs. in this area the prime minister has been eager to exploit opportunities to sell canada’s oil, gas and other natural resources abroad with particular attention focused on the giant us and emerging chinese markets. consequently, despite a commitment to smaller government and respect for provincial jurisdiction, the federal government finds itself involved in major interventions that favor some regions over others and appears to contradict the basic principles of open federalism. given the political and calculated nature of these interventions we contend that ‘strategic federalism’ provides a better description of the government’s approach than ‘open federalism’. because our focus is on federal spending in canada, we engage mainly with the literature seeking to dissect how neoliberal policies are adopted across time and place. this includes the literature on ‘varieties of neoliberalism’ (cerny, 2004) and that which seeks to understand the distinctive ways in which it is practiced at different scales (e.g., varro, 2010; mackinnon & shaw, 2010). however we are also influenced by ongoing debates concerning broader manifestations of neoliberalism and the impact of particular types of state intervention. in this wider context the paper’s conception of neoliberalization draws on the so-called neoliberal commandments (harvey, 2003) predicated on the washington consensus (williamson, 1990). in particular we emphasize the focus these approaches place on fiscal and monetary austerity, the lowering of inflation rates, trade and financial liberalization, deregulation, and reorientation of public expenditure, the freeing of interest rates, and emergence of independent central banks. we also share harvey’s view that neo-liberalism must be understood as a comprehensive theory of political as well as economic practices as this firmly acknowledges that the state has a key and selective role to play in advancing the neo-liberal project including the creation of “free markets” and “free trade”. (harvey, 2003) state interventions into the economy during the neoliberal era have shifted drastically from protecting individuals from the perils of the market and limiting corporate power during the keynesian era to subsidizing corporations, promoting competitiveness of national economies, and undermining the power of labor (ruckert, 2006). significant in this shift has been the growing power of increasingly global capital, in contrast to largely immobile labour (ruckert, 2009). this has been facilitated 36 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism and reflected by the ‘internationalization of the state’ whereby nation states increasingly prioritize the interests of transnational (financial) capital over domestic (industrial) capital and social groupings (ruckert, 2010; baker, 1999). this has helped fashion the deregulation of financial markets and the opening up of national economies to international competition. importantly ruckert (2010) connects this process to institutional changes, in particular the growing influence of the state agencies that are linked to (and often directly represent) the interests of transnational capital, such as ministries of finance and central banks. the ascendency of financial institutions and the deregulation that has accompanied it has been highly significant in the emergence of neoliberalism and the resulting crisis. as harvie and milburn (2011) argue, while the postwar keynesian settlement contained an explicit deal linking rising real wages to rising productivity, neoliberalism contained an implicit deal based on access to cheap credit. while real wages have stagnated since the late 1970s, the mechanisms of debt have maintained most people’s living standards. the financial crisis shattered the central component of this deal by restricting access to cheap credit and undermining confidence in financial markets and continued growth. faced with a severe financial crisis, governments initially intervened to stimulate spending, subsidize corporations and shore up markets leading to suggestions of a return to keynesian style government and the demise of neoliberal hegemony. however, the hasty return to austerity measures combined with attacks on public services and the public servants that provide them have reaffirmed that any shift in policy will be short-lived and should not be conflated with paradigmatic or fundamental reforms. our analysis of spending trends combined with the government’s stated priorities suggests that canadians face an intensification of neoliberal policies rather than a shift or decline. as such we are likely to see continued and growing inequality within canadian society on a scale greater than before the crisis. warning of the dangers of growing inequality, stiglitz (2012) identifies this trend in the us, with america’s current level of income inequality at historic levels not seen before the great depression. in the boom years before the financial crisis in 2008, the top 1 percent seized more than 65 percent of the gain in national income. in 2010, as the us struggled to emerge from a deep recession, the 1 percent gained 93 percent of the additional income created in the so-called recovery (stiglitz, 2012). with respect to neoliberalism, stiglitz points out that inequality does not arise in a vacuum but from the interplay of market forces and political crisis and opportunism | 37 machinations. over time, he argues, politics has shaped the market in ways that advantage those at the top at the expense of the rest of society. with an economic system that seems to fail most citizens and a political system that appears captive to moneyed interests, he warns of the price of growing inequality in terms of slower growth, lower gdp, greater instability and a variety of social and democratic threats. it is in this context that we examine the policy response of the harper government following the financial crisis and consider the implications for canada the paper is organized into four parts. first, we examine the ‘big picture’ of federal revenue and expenses in canada over the last decade with a focus on stimulus and austerity measures. second, we turn to the ministries of trade and natural resources—two of the biggest ‘winners’ in revenue terms over recent years. we examine just how these ministries have expanded and consider the meaning of this within the broader context of fiscal federalism and the economy. from this high level analysis of public accounts we consider the federal government’s policy priorities and policy focus. third, we reflect on the most recent budget (2012) and what this means for the direction of change. the final section offers conclusions. from stimulus to austerity the onset of the global economic crisis led to a common refrain amongst commentators that “we are all keynesians now”. interestingly, governments that were ideologically opposed to such spending would now need to adopt stimulus policies in order to strengthen investment, consumer and business confidence (and capital liquidity). canada’s response was launched through its 2007 economic statement. the stimulus budget proposed $60 billion in broad-based tax relief over five years. this was followed by a two-year commitment to financial stimulus measures focused on taxation, employment insurance benefits, and infrastructure investments, as outlined in the 2009-10 budget, entitled canada’s economic action plan. similar to other countries, the stimulus measures adopted through canada’s 2009-2010 budget focused on encouraging economic growth. that budget stated stimulus measures were guided by three principles—that they be “timely, targeted and temporary” (government of canada 2009, p.4). the budget further stated that measures would begin within 120 days of the budget being passed; that the measures would focus on targeting businesses and families in the greatest need in order to trigger increases in jobs and output and; finally, that the plan would be phased out 38 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism “when the economy recovers [in order] to avoid long-term structural deficits” (ibid). while some aspects of the plan would be phased out (i.e., infrastructure spending) the stimulus measures clearly stated that one objective would be to “reduce taxes permanently” (department of finance, 2010). we can see in chart 1 below the recession reflected in the government’s public accounts. program expenses increased as a percent of gdp while revenues decreased. it is important to note that part of this revenue decline comes from the decision to reduce taxation in a number of areas. for example the decision to drop two percentage points off of the goods and services tax(gst) and to reduce the corporate tax rate. this figure is further compounded by a contraction of economic growth over these years. while federal government revenues as a percentage of gdp have steadily decreased over the past decade (from 18.1 per cent in 2000-01 to 14.6 per cent in 2010-11), program expenses as a percentage of gdp saw increases in the 2009-10 and 2010-11 periods (at 16.0 and 14.7 per cent respectively). this is a slight increase from the previous three years where program expenditures as a percentage of gdp were steady at 13 per cent. in the past two years there has been an operating deficit (2009-10 and 2010-11) and over the past three year period there has been a budgetary deficit (between 2008-09 and 2010-11). the increasing size of the deficit (both budgetary and operational) has been instrumental in the narrative of austerity. chart 1. public accounts, fiscal transactions, per cent of gdp, 2000-2011 the government posted a budgetary deficit of $55.6 billion for the fiscal year ending march 31, 2010 (department of finance, 2010). finance minister flaherty blamed the 2010 fiscal year record deficit on the $5.6 billion payout to british columbia and ontario to assist with the transition to the harmonized sales tax, and the decision to limit increases in employcrisis and opportunism | 39 ment insurance premiums (ibid.). while these obviously contributed to the overall size of the deficit, they are only part of the fiscal equation with the government also responsible for cuts in direct and indirect taxation over this period in addition to its spending on stimulus measures. clearly the policy preference for tax cuts has helped to diminish government revenues and in doing so has also contributed to the narrative of ‘belt tightening’ for the public sector. having helped manufacture a sizeable deficit, minister flaherty has made it the deficit into as a major public issue and used it to justify austerity measures, warning canadians to brace themselves against significant cutbacks in budget 2012 (ibid.). the chart below illustrates these trends. personal income tax, expressed as a percentage of gdp, has consistently declined over that past decade, with the exception of the 2010-11 period, when there was a slight increase (from 6.8 percent to 7.0 per cent of gdp). total tax revenue as a percentage of gdp has declined and flattened, hitting an all time low over the past three years. corporate income tax as a percentage of gdp has been lower in the past three years than in the previous five. overall, revenues as a percentage of gdp show a declining trend over the past decade. economically, this shift is consistent with the political shift to ‘open federalism’s’ commitment to smaller government. chart 2. public accounts, government of canada revenue by type, percent of gdp, 2000-2011 a high level analysis of public accounts from the past decade shows evidence of ‘roll-back neoliberalism’ (peck and tickell, 2002). government revenues have slowly declined and the public sector is urged to do less with less. the conservative government has expressed a commitment to leave as much as possible to the private sector. the economic crisis has brought with it opportunism – it has led to a wide swath of 40 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism tax cuts (some of them, permanent) and has reoriented spending in a number of areas. the size of the deficit is however part of a fiscal choice to reduce taxation. while the conservative government expresses preference for smaller government and limited spending, there are inconsistencies in the expression of these preferences across portfolios—some ministries and departments have grown considerably, while others have diminished in revenue and policy importance. while we have seen evidence of ‘roll-back neo-liberalism’ there is also evidence of ‘roll-out neoliberalism’ as certain ministries become the focus of government policies and spending. the chart below provides an analysis of the changes in public accounts since 2006. it shows the percentage change of total net expenditures by ministry between the years 2006 and 2001 (in constant 2002 dollars). the red line denotes the average percentage change for all – a 14.30 percentage increase. those ministries above the red line gained more than the average in revenue terms over those years, and those below it lost more than the average. hence, this gives some indications of relative spending priorities. by this analysis, the ministries of transport and natural resources have seen the greatest percentage increases. this percentage change figure should be read with caution in the case of some ministries – the privy council, the governor general, parliament, finance and justice can see major fluctuations in funding for a variety of reasons. for example, parliament and the governor general may have large capital expenditure due to renovations. the privy council (pco) may have special royal commission expenditures (or see fluctuations because it includes the office of the chief electoral officer), and finance can have highly fluctuating transfer payments. from this overall analysis, two federal priorities clearly emerge – infrastructure and natural resources. crisis and opportunism | 41 chart 3. public accounts, percentage change total net ministerial expenditure, 2006-2011, constant dollars federal priorities: infrastructure and natural resources transport and infrastructure the ministry of transport has grown in importance over the years, with numerous agencies and authorities being added to it.2 the chart below shows the total budget by authority within the transport ministry for the fiscal years 2006-2011 (in millions, 2002 constant dollars). it is clear from this analysis why the revenues of the ministry have increased 2 in 2004, the ministry was composed of transport canada, the canadian transportation agency (a regulatory agency) and the transportation appeal tribunal of canada. in 2005, this portfolio was expanded to include the office of infrastructure of canada, the national capital commission, the canada post corporation and the royal canadian mint two years later, it would include the canadian air transport security authority, the federal bridge corporation limited, the jacques cartier and champlain bridges incorporated, via rail canada inc., marine atlantic inc. and old port of montreal corporation inc. the old port of montreal corporation existed under this portfolio from 2006-2009. 42 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism so considerably in the past several years – infrastructure canada has seen massive budgetary increases over this period. the remainder of this section will focus on the gains of this department. chart 4. transport ministry—total budget of authorities used by fiscal year, millions of dollars, 2002 constant dollars stimulus responses in the wake of the late 2007 financial crisis focused on short-term growth (raising aggregate demand) as well as long-term growth by aiming to create favorable conditions for investment and innovation. these measures entailed both revenue side policies (cuts to direct and indirect taxes and social insurance contributions) and spending side policies of which there are many possibilities. one of the most popular choices made by governments on the spending side has been the ramping up of public investment in infrastructure. the infrastructure components of the stimulus measures in canada were approximately $40 billion (cad) over two years.3 the largest portions of the infrastructure measures were tax credits for households – e.g., home renovation and energy efficiency tax credits administered through the canada revenue agency.4 these tax incentives to households accounted for approximately 28 per cent of all 3 this figure is the sum of total reported stimulus measures for 2009 and 2010. this figure does not include funds leveraged by other orders of government e.g., through the creation of stimulus programs requiring matching grants, which, in the canadian case are a significant amount (department of finance canada, 2009). 4 knowledge infrastructure has been excluded (department of finance canada, 2009). crisis and opportunism | 43 infrastructure related stimulus spending.5 the second largest proportion was allocated to social housing, first nations housing and northern housing at approximately 15.4 per cent of total infrastructure related funding and administered through the canada mortgage and housing corporation (cmhc) and indian and northern affairs (inac) in some cases.6 the third largest component of funding was allocated to a mixture of provincial, municipal and first nations, territorial and some federal infrastructure—amounting to approximately nine per cent of total infrastructure related investments.7 many of the infrastructure investments that were chosen were often less complicated projects such as road expansion as opposed to more transformative projects such as transit for which the employment effects of stimulus spending are greater (ccpa, 2009, p.2). in many oecd countries, the infrastructure components of stimulus programs included transformative long-term projects (oecd, 2011). the chart below details spending by major program area for infrastructure canada between the years 2008-2011 (in 2002 constant dollars).8 funding programs have significantly expanded in infrastructure from but two major program areas in the 2008-09 fiscal year to 14 in the 2010-11 fiscal year. some of this is one time funding, such as support for the g20 and g8 summits. however, much of it represents a major program of investment into large infrastructure projects, particularly in areas that support trade such as the asia pacific gateways and corridors initiative; the ontario-quebec continental gateway and trade corridor and; the atlantic gateway and trade corridor. these initiatives involve major partnerships between the federal and provincial and municipal governments to connect canada to eastern, western and southern markets with significant funding attached to the development of border crossings, ports, airports, railway lines and major highways across the region. 5 calculation includes funding for the programs home renovation tax credit; enhancing the energy efficiency of our homes; increasing withdrawal limits under the home buyers’ plan and; first-time home buyers’ tax credit as a proportion of all infrastructure-related funding measures. this figure excludes knowledge infrastructure. 6 ibid. 7 ibid. 8 fields noted ‘not applicable’ (n/a) indicate funding has been discontinued. 44 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism chart 5. office of infrastructure canada – expenditure components by program type, millions of dollars, 2002 constant dollars. the role of the federal government in municipal affairs has gone through waves of engagement and disengagement over the past decades. the harper government is publicly committed to the principles of ‘open federalism’ and seeks to adhere to the constitutional division of powers wherein municipalities are ‘creatures’ of the provinces. however, their strong role in infrastructure development and a particular orientation to trade is a major area of federal involvement—one that sets a strong direction for urban policy in canada’s biggest city regions. in this role, the federal government is a leader, committing vast sums of money to build partnerships that will reorient our urban regions around a trade agenda. crisis and opportunism | 45 natural resources unlike the ministry of transport, the ministry of natural resources has been a relatively stable portfolio.9 the chart below shows the total budget by authority within the natural resources ministry for the fiscal years 2006-2011 (in millions, 2002 constant dollars). as was seen in the case of infrastructure canada, the department of natural resources leads in gains. chart 6. ministry of natural resources, total budget of authorities used by fiscal year, millions of dollars, 2002 constant dollars. the department of natural resources seeks to enhance the use and competitiveness of canada’s natural resources products. the department conducts scientific research and technology development in the fields of energy, forests, mineral and metals and earth sciences. as a lead department in the natural resources development they are involved in environmental assessments and their work must comply with the cana9 it is composed of the department of natural resources, atomic energy of canada limited, the northern pipeline agency, the canadian nuclear safety commission, the national energy board and cape breton development corporation. the cape breton development corporation was disbanded in 2009. 46 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism dian environmental assessment act and the cabinet directive on the environmental assessment of policy plan and program proposals. chart 7 (below) shows expenditure components by program type for the department of natural resources (millions of dollars, 2002 constant dollars). one can see that over the past few years, the department has focused its attentions on adaptation management (including hazard risk management and climate adaptation). some of these functions had previously been undertaken by environment canada and one can make the argument that environmental protection might be better placed there rather than a department whose mandate is resource development. chart 7. department of natural resources – expenditure components by program type, millions of dollars, 2002 constant dollars. the prime minister’s efforts to promote canadian exports abroad and natural resources in particular, has been a key feature of canada’s recent trade and foreign policy. strong lobbying for the keystone xl pipeline and the recent visits to china, malaysia and japan were aimed at increasing trade surpluses with these countries and underline the govcrisis and opportunism | 47 ernment’s strategy to use economic growth as means of paying down the deficit in time for the next election. in a 2006 speech, mr. harper set out his vision of canada as a “global energy superpower power” and was reportedly furious with president obama’s 2011 announcement to delay the keystone xl pipeline for at least a year. soon after, harper had established energy exports as the government’s new top strategic priority, with asia seen as the key market to target, making enbridge’ northern gateway pipeline to the seaport at kitimat bc an essential project (wells and mcmahon, 2012). this context helps explain why environmental assessments have recently been streamlined and also the alacrity with which prime minister harper appears to have backtracked in relation to china’s record on human rights. as corcoran observes “his [mr. harper’s] previous issues with china appear to have been sidelined, replaced in part by some neonixonian strategizing over potential economic advantage over the united states” (corcoran, 2012). heading to china, mr. harper set out his intentions and his hopes very clearly: “[a]s you know, our country is looking for new markets for our goods and services and china and the entire asiapacific region is an area of tremendous opportunity,” and added, “[w]e hope to expand on our strategic partnership with china and, in particular, we hope to deepen the economic and trade ties between our two countries” (corcoran, 2012). this represents a significant shift in policy by the government and it remains to be seen how the us will react and how deeper trade ties with china and asia will develop. opportunism amidst crisis: the narrative of austerity and the 2012 federal budget having examined federal expenditures over the past several years, we turn here to the most recent federal budget to examine some of its implications for policy development in the near term. for several reasons, the 2012 budget can be seen as a watershed moment in a politically realigned canada and speculation was intense leading up to its release. the conservatives having secured a much sought after majority were finally in a position to define their political agenda without having to depend on the mercurial support of the opposition parties. political opponents feared that the way was now clear for the conservatives to push ahead with the implementation of the so-called harper agenda, particularly in view of the fact that both the ndp and liberal parties had spent most of 2011-12 in limbo as they attempted to (re)establish long-term leadership and political direction. that said an uncertain 48 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism and fragile fiscal and economic climate, a weak majority and a series of political scandals including the so-called “in and out” scandal, misuse of the g8/g20 border infrastructure fund and the “robocall” election fraud made this a challenging environment within which to introduce an austerity budget. in particular it required the government to tread carefully as it balanced cuts in public spending with the fragile economic recovery and the political fallout that typically accompanies cuts in core services and benefits such as pensions and old age security spending. when the conservatives came to power in 2006 they inherited a budget surplus of $8-billion. in 2008, the government entered into a deficit due to falling tax revenue and higher spending. in its november 2011 economic update, the government projected canada’s deficit for 2011-2012 would be $31-billion, although recent indicators suggest it could be lower. in 2010-2011, canada’s actual deficit was $33.4-billion. whether or not the 2012 budget is seen as draconian response to this size of deficit, the government’s majority allied to its commitment to slay the deficit created an opportunity to prioritize its spending and program commitments in a way that was not conceivable in previous years. as during the election campaign, mr. flaherty and the prime minister said repeatedly that jobs and economic growth are their first priority. not surprisingly therefore, the first harper majority government budget on march 29th was titled and pitched as a jobs, growth and long-term prosperity budget, with links back to the economic action plan from their minority government years. stressing that canada has done relatively well in the global recession context and in job creation since 2009, finance minister jim flaherty emphasized instead the structural problems that canada must now address both for long-term prosperity and “to ensure the sustainability of public finances and social programs for future generations” the structural fundamentalism of the budget, that is, its greater focus on steps needed to ensure the full potential of the economy is intended to be the main message.10 the harper list of policies and initiatives (spending, tax and regulatory in nature) in their order of presentation include: • supporting entrepreneurs, innovators and worldclass research • responsible resource development • expanding trade and opening new markets for canadian business 10 on structural fundamentalism, see doern et al, 2013, chapter 3. crisis and opportunism | 49 • investing in training, infrastructure and opportunity • expanding opportunities for aboriginal peoples to fully participate in the economy • building a fast and flexible economic immigration system • sustainable social programs and secure retirement • responsible expenditure management11 the budget cuts of $5.2 billion, mainly referred to in the final “responsible expenditure management” section are not highlighted although considerable attention is drawn in the budget to the elimination of 19,200 civil service jobs. among the agencies mentioned in the budget to be eliminated outright are assisted human reproduction canada (beset with constitutional and court challenges) and the national roundtable on the environment and the economy (an advisory body not favoured by the conservatives, in part because of its climate change policy advocacy). further budget cuts are planned to reach about $5 billion a year by 2014-2015 (see further discussion below of cuts and the strategic review process headed by treasury board president, tony clement). under the above structural themes other key particular initiatives were announced in budget 2012). among these are: • increase funding for research and development by small and medium-sized companies, including through a refocusing of the role of the national research council. • in the resource development sphere, bring forward legislation to achieve the goal of “one project, one review” in a clearly defined period. • pursue new and deeper trading relationships, particularly with large, dynamic and fast-growing economies. • invest in first nations education on reserve, including early literacy programming and other supports and services to first nations schools and students. • move to an increasingly fast and flexible immigration system where priority focus is on meeting canada’s labour market needs. • gradually increase the age of eligibility for old age security (oas) and guaranteed income supplement benefits from 65 to 67. 11 government of canada, 2012, p.5-11. 50 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism this change will start in april 2023 with full implementation by january 2029, and will not affect anyone who is 54 years of age or older as of march 31st, 2012.12 as these priorities and initiatives demonstrate, the government’s response to the fiscal crisis has been influenced by the neoliberal framework and “commandments” outlined in the introduction. just as the financial crisis in canada was at least in part manufactured by domestic fiscal policy, the urgency with which the deficit is being tackled is just as much a question of politics as it is economics. in a political context it is important that the deficit is reduced quickly and, specifically, in time for the next federal election. having already committed to return to a surplus position by then the question for the conservatives appears to be how not whether to implement cuts. to this end much emphasis has been placed on strategic review. in canada, “program reviews” that check all government spending have been a feature of public sector managing since the late 1970s. at that time these reviews were infrequent and usually responded to political promises that spending would be kept to a minimum. it was not until the late 1990s that such reviews became a routine feature of canadian public management, culminating in “strategic reviews” introduced in 2006, and now “operational reviews” (not the same thing) introduced in 2011. these latter reviews are intended to find significant one-time cuts in services, rather than ongoing and permanent cuts as in the case of the former. “strategic reviews” were introduced to force departments and agencies to find critical savings and to use these savings to align with key government priorities. such reviews are conducted every four years with the objective of finding five percent savings from low performing, low priority programs and services. the goal of the latest strategic and operating review is to find ongoing savings of at least $4-billion a year by 2014-2015 from departments’ total $80-billion operating budget. this represents only one part of total federal spending and includes the cost of staff and benefits etc. the rest of the spending, including $150-billion in program spending and transfers, are not part of the spending review. consequently out of a total spending of almost $250-billion, including about $30-billion in interest on the federal debt, the government aims to cut spending by 1.5%. more than 60 departments have submitted plans to cabinet for either five to 10 per cent cuts to their budgets, by finding operating efficiencies and examining the usefulness of programs. 12 government of canada, 2012, p.5-11. crisis and opportunism | 51 the stated desire to avoid cuts in services is attractive to governments because it reduces the political fall-out with the electorate and provides the opposition and critics with less ammunition. the government’s strategy is to present cuts as targeting inefficiency, red tape and redundant “back room” bureaucrats rather than services and benefits. in order to further reduce the political pain some commentators have suggested that mr. flaherty is also conducting a “strategy by stealth” approach to realizing cuts and deficit reduction (reynolds, 2011). this view is predicated on two main patterns of action that have helped minister flaherty achieve “real dollar, per-capita austerity” over the each of the last 5 years without the kinds of protests and political fallout seen in other countries in response to austerity measures. first, reynolds points to program spending increases that are less than the amount needed to keep pace with population-plus inflation adjustments. a budget prepared in this way will show nominal increases in national expenditure every year (averaging 2 per cent a year) even though they are, de-facto, cuts. second, he points to minister flaherty’s attempts to look for and weed out government programs that are no longer seen to serve a productive purpose. by making small, incremental spending cuts, “here and there, hither and yon”, he contends that minister. flaherty has provided the world with a good example of “responsible restraint – without inciting mobs” (reynolds, 2011). because these kinds of cuts are difficult to notice, he describes the process as “austerity on the quiet” (reynolds, 2011). clearly this approach is politically attractive as it avoids minus signs on the fiscal ledger, and it is harder for the opposition to galvanize resistance around specific or draconian cuts. reynolds concludes it is an effective strategy that has managed to realize $10billion of savings in recent years. in spite of the political attractiveness of stealth as a means of achieving reductions many fiscal conservatives would like to see more severe cuts, particularly in areas that have become political and ideological targets or simply to signal government priorities. not surprisingly in this context, further job cuts are predicted for environment canada, in addition to the 776 already announced in 2011-12. consistent with a neoliberal agenda, environmental assessments have been seen to slow down projects and the exploitation of natural resources across canada, and in its northern regions in particular, and the government is keen to suspend these for projects pending, labeling them as excessive red tape and impediments to economic growth and jobs. specific programs and green energy initiatives were also being pinpointed for cuts and/or eradication. the target of these proposed cuts are clearly green and renewable energy programs 52 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism which, since the expansion of the alberta tar sands, have increasingly come to symbolize the deepening ideological divide between canada’s left and right on energy and environmental policy as well as the splits between the provinces. while ontario and other provinces have begun to seriously invest in renewable energy programs, alberta and saskatchewan look to the federal government for policies that facilitate greater exploitation of oil and gas as well as other natural resources. given the harper conservative’s commitment to jobs, growth, increased trade and their western political base, it is no surprise that spending on the environment and in renewable energies continues to be vulnerable. consequently the government has sought to minimize climate change as an issue, withdrawn from kyoto and effectively given up the pretence of taking serious action to reduce emissions. however, it is not just the substance of the 2012 budget that has caused concern; critics also point to the lack of transparency and informed debate that has been a constant feature of the process. bill c-38, also called the jobs, growth and long-term prosperity act, tabled the 2012 budget as part of a so-called omnibus bill. over 420 pages long, it has been described as a “statutory juggernaut” that introduces, amends, or repeals nearly 70 federal laws. it has been presented to the house of commons in a manner that may be without close precedent in canadian parliamentary history and has made proper parliamentary scrutiny impossible in the time available (galvin, 2012). the parliamentary budget officer has also been concerned by the lack of reporting to parliament on the impact of the cuts announced in the 2012 budget as well as the previous two and is fighting to have details released by the government. liberal mp john mccallum said this “slow oozing” of information over months erodes transparency and accountability and silences any debate at committees on what programs and services canadians may be losing (may, 2012). he also expected this delay and “lack of transparency” since treasury board recently ordered departments not to include details about the reductions in their annual planning and priorities reports to parliament (may 2012). conclusion the policy practices of the harper government over the past few years have transformed much of what the state does and how it does it. the narrative of austerity has been formative in the ability of the government to push through these transformative changes. in particular, the economic crisis and canada’s growing reliance on oil and crisis and opportunism | 53 gas for its economic wellbeing has allowed the government to shift policy direction in ways that might have seemed impossible when they came to power. as this paper has shown, the crisis of austerity is at least in part a manufactured one—based on the decision to reduce taxation in a number of areas. this narrative of ‘crisis’ has been instrumental in reducing government involvement in a range of activities and in plans to decrease the size of the public service significantly. numerous women’s groups have lost their funding; the roundtable for the environment and the economy has been disbanded; as has the canadian council on learning.13 these are but a small sample of groups and policy issues affected. at the same time, regulatory and oversight mechanisms are being eroded in such areas as trade and environmental assessments (woods, 2012). while the government is divesting its involvement in many areas, it is increasing them in others—as we have shown through the departments of infrastructure and natural resources. consequently, we argue that ‘open federalism’ is a serious misnomer and that ‘strategic federalism’ better describes the selective nature of the federal role under the harper government. our analysis of public accounts has sought to take a look at overall spending patterns and focus on two examples, but the data holds many stories of interest. rather than abandoning the neoliberal project, we believe that recent budgets, policies and priorities suggest that a more intense and comprehensive neoliberal agenda is emerging in canada. dissecting these changes and what they mean for the longer term will be a major task in the coming years. the well-documented restriction of information and control of communications complicates this task (office of the information commissioner of canada, 2010; the professional institute of the public service of canada, 2011; maher, 2011). but, such work will be pivotal in understanding how neoliberal policies, in the case of this government, are being practiced. we hope to have contributed in some small way to this dialogue. 13 as of april 25, 2011, thirty-five women’s organizations in canada have had federal funding significantly cut or ended all together (ad hoc coalition for women’s equality and human rights 2011). 54 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism references ad hoc coalition for women’s equality and human rights (2011). http:// www.womensequality.ca/ bagnall, j. (2011, june 10). afraid of 2012? remember the budget of 1995. the ottawa citizen. http://www.fcpp.org/publication.php/3797 baker, a. (1999). nebuleuse and the ‘internationalization of the state’ in the uk? the case of hm treasury and the bank of england. review of international political economy, 6(1), 79-100 bruno, j. (2012, february 27). the majority governing conservatives are having a difficult time deciding what to cut, what to keep, and where to reallocate the scarce funds. the hill times. http://www.hilltimes.com/ news/news/2012/02/27/expect-a%e2%80%98watershed%e2%80%99federal-budget-say-experts/29723 ccpa (2009). 2009 budget analysis. ottawa: canadian centre for policy alternative. cerny, p. g. (2004). mapping varieties of neoliberalism. paper prepared for presentation at the annual convention of the international studies association, montreal, québec, 17-20 march 2004 and the annual conference of the political studies association of the united kingdom, 6-8 april 2004. http://www.psa.ac.uk/cps/2004/cerny.pdf coen, d. & roberts, a. (2012). a new age of uncertainty. governance: an international journal of policy, administration, and institutions, 25(1) 5-9. corcoran, t. (2012, february 10). panda politics: it’s trickier than you think. national post. http://opinion.financialpost.com/2012/02/10/pandapolitics-its-trickier-thanyou-think/ de souza, m. (2012, april 6). quebec tories say stephen harper creating ‘winning conditions’ for referendum. postmedia news. http://lifestyle. topnewstoday.org/culture/article/1969375/ department of finance (2010). annual financial report of the government of canada fiscal year 2009–2010. http://www.fin.gc.ca/afr-rfa/2010/ report-rapport-eng.asp department of finance canada. (2007). strong leadership, a better canada: economic statement. ottawa: government of canada, october 30, 2007. department of finance canada. (2009). budget 2009: canada’s economic action plan backgrounder. ottawa: government of canada. http://www. fin.gc.ca/n08/09-011eng.asp doern, g.b., a.m. maslove and m.j. prince. (2013). canadian public budgeting in the age of crises. ottawa and kingston: mcgill-queens press. easterbrook, w.t. & watkins, m.h. (1984) the staple approach. in w.t easterbrook & m.h. watkins (eds.), approaches to canadian economic history (pp. 1–98). ottawa: carleton university press. crisis and opportunism | 55 evans, b. & albo, g. (2011). permanent austerity: the politics of the canadian exit strategy from fiscal stimulus. alternate routes: a journal of critical social research, 22, 7-28. fanelli, c. & hurl, c. (2011). janus-faced austerity: strengthening the ‘competitive’ canadian state. alternate routes: a journal of critical social research, 22, 29-50. fekete, f. (2012b, march 16) future of public service in hands of nine parliamentarians. postmedia news. retrieved september 30, 2012, from http://www2.canada.com/future+public+service+hands+nine+parliame ntarians/63 14885/story.html?id=6314885 fekete, j. (2012a, march 10). bureaucrats must shift to efficiency and constraint: clement. canada.com. http://www2.canada.com/topics/ news/story.html?id=6282995 galloway, g. (2012, march 5). spare veterans from budget axe, opposition says. globe and mail update. http://m.theglobeandmail.com/news/ politics/ottawanotebook/spare-veterans-from-budget-axe-opposition says/article2358967/?service=mobile galloway, g. (2011, november 29). after the tory witch-hunt against the cbc, who’ll be next? globe and mail. http://www.theglobeandmail.com/ arts/television/after-thetory-witch-hunt-against-the-cbc-wholl-benext/article4179574/ glavin, t. (2012, may 7). something’s fishy with bill c-38. national post. http://www2.canada.com/ottawacitizen/news/archives/story. html?id=cb8b39a4f566-4e5a-a5c9-f3431c0dd554 government of canada (2009, january 27). canada’s economic action plan. budget 2009, tabled in the house of commons by j.m. flaherty, p.c., m.p. minister of finance. government of canada (2010, march 4). canada’s economic action plan, year 2: leading the way on jobs and growth. budget 2010, tabled in the house of commons by j.m. flaherty, p.c., m.p. minister of finance. government of canada (2011). infrastructure stimulus fund. infrastructure canada. http://www.infrastructure.gc.ca/prog/other-autres-eng. html#isf-fsi government of canada (2012, november 11). jobs, growth and long term prosperity, economic action plan 2012: the budget in brief. department of finance. http://www.budget.gc.ca/2012/rd-dc/brief-bref-2012-eng. pdf gray, k. (2011, august 10). a defenseless economy. the ottawa citizen. http://blogs.ottawacitizen.com/2011/08/10/a-defenceless-economy/ harmes, a. (2007). the political economy of open federalism. canadian journal of political science, 40(2), 417-437. harvey, d. (2003). the new imperialism. oxford: oxford university press. 56 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism harvie, d. & milburn, k. (2011, august 4). the zombie of neoliberalism can be beaten – through mass direct action. the guardian. http://www. guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/aug/04/neoliberalism-zombie action-phone-hacking innis, h. (1956). essays in canadian economic history. toronto: university of toronto press. kipp, k. (2012, march 15). most disabled access projects going to tory ridings: documents. postmedia news. http://www. calgaryherald.com/business/most+disabled+access+projects+going+ tory+ridings+documents/6309515/story.html krugman, p. (2010, july 1). op ed column: myths of austerity. the new york times. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/02/opinion/02krugman. html maher, s. (2011, november 30). harper’s pr obsession fostering paranoia and paralysis in the public service. canada.com. http://www2. canada.com/news/maher+harper+obsession+fostering+paranoia+pa ralysis+public+service/5792000/story.html?id=5792000 may, k. (2012, march 14). budget won’t reveal details of ps cuts. the ottawa citizen. from http://www.ottawacitizen.com/opinion/oped/ budget+reveal+details+cuts+clement+says/6303389/story.html mackinnon, d. & shaw, j. (2010). new state spaces, agency and scale: devolution and the regionalisation of transport governance in scotland. antipode, 42(5), 1226-1252. nadeau, r. (2008, march 25). the economist has no clothes: unscientific assumptions in economic theory are undermining efforts to solve environmental problems. the scientific american. http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=the-economisthas-no-clothes nguyen, l. (2012, february 24). jim flaherty says there ‘shouldn’t be any tax increases’ in next budget. postmedia news. http://www.theguardian. pe.ca/business/201202-24/article-2906460/jim-flaherty-says-thereshouldnt-be-any-tax-increases-innext-budget/1 oecd [organisation for economic development and cooperation] (2011). making the most of public investment in a tight fiscal environment: multilevel governance lessons from the crisis. paris: oecd. office of the information commissioner of canada (2010). special report to parliament: interference with access to information requests. ottawa, ontario. peck, j. & tickell, a. (2002). neoliberalizing space. antipode, 34(3), 380–404. pm of canada (2006, march 21). prime minister promotes open federalism. office of the prime minister of canada. retrieved september 30, 2012, from http://pm.gc.ca/eng/media.asp?id=1123. crisis and opportunism | 57 public works and government services canada [pwgsc] (2010). public accounts of canada, volume ii, details of expenses and revenues. government of canada, prepared by the receiver general of canada. public works and government services canada [pwgsc] (2005). public accounts of canada, volume ii, details of expenses and revenues. government of canada, prepared by the receiver general of canada. public works and government services canada [pwgsc] (2006). public accounts of canada, volume ii, details of expenses and revenues. government of canada, prepared by the receiver general of canada. public works and government services canada [pwgsc] (2007). public accounts of canada, volume ii, details of expenses and revenues. government of canada, prepared by the receiver general of canada. public works and government services canada [pwgsc] (2008). public accounts of canada, volume ii, details of expenses and revenues. government of canada, prepared by the receiver general of canada. public works and government services canada [pwgsc] (2009). public accounts of canada, volume ii, details of expenses and revenues. government of canada, prepared by the receiver general of canada. public works and government services canada [pwgsc] (2011). public accounts of canada, volume ii, details of expenses and revenues. government of canada, prepared by the receiver general of canada. pugliese, d. (2012, march 9). opposition mps say they’ll now think twice about accepting canadian forces’ invitations. the ottawa citizen. http://www.ottawacitizen.com/news/opposition%20they%20 think%20twice%20ab out%20accepting%20canadian%20forces%20 invitations/6280032/story.html ruckert, a. (2006). towards an inclusive-neoliberal regime of development: from the washington to the post-washington consensus. labour, capital and society, 39(1), 34-67. ruckert, a. (2009). periodizing neoliberal development policy: from destructive ‘roll back’ and constructive ‘roll out’ to inclusive neoliberalism. paper presented at the annual convention of the canadian political science association reynolds, n. (2011, september 6). jim flaherty: the master of stealth austerity. the globe and mail. http://www.theglobeandmail.com/reporton-business/robcommentary/jim-flaherty-the-master-of-stealthausterity/article627118/ stiglitz, j. e. (2012). the price of inequity: how today’s divided society endangers our future, norton: ny. the professional institute of the public service of canada (2011, july 28). privy council muzzles canadian scientist. http://www.pipsc.ca/portal/ page/portal/website/news/newsreleases/news/072811 58 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism varro, k. (2010). re-politicising the analysis of ‘new state spaces’ in hungary and beyond: towards an effective engagement with ‘actually existing neoliberalism.’ antipode, 42(5), 1253-1278. veldhuis, n. & lammam, c. (2012), march 5. the chopping block: cut $10-billion now. national post. http://opinion.financialpost. com/2012/03/05/the-chopping-blockcut-10-billion-now/ wells, p. & mcmahon, t. (2012, april 2). oil power. maclean’s magazine, p.16. corcoran, t. (2012, march 6). the chopping block: opinion. national post. http://www.nationalpost.com/opinion/where+flaherty+begin/6255598/ story.html williams, b. & mcneill, j. m. (2005). the current crisis in neoclassical economics and the case for an economic analysis based on sustainable development. u21 global working paper, no. 001/2005. williamson, j. (1990). latin american adjustment: how much has happened? washington, d.c.: institute for international economics. woods, m. (2012, april 17). federal budget: critics blast ottawa’s plan to overhaul environmental review process. the star. http://www. thestar.com/news/canada/politics/article/1162871—tories-introduce sweeping-changes-to-environmental-assessments 103 toward a marxist theory of transition chuck smith this essay attempts to do two things: 1) to familiarize the reader with certain theoretical concepts (problematic, mode of production, social formation, historical conjuncture, class struggle; 2) to further the process of theorization of these concepts in order that they may be further elaborated and more fruitfully applied to the study and propagation of large scale social change. such an approach is utilized by the writer as the method of theoretical analysis in the study of colonial social formations. the basic thesis i wish to put forward is that, the elaboration of the concepts mode of product ion, social formation and class struggle will lead to the building up of an adequate conceptual framework for understanding and changing man's social relations. the key concepts mode of production and social formation are formulated and utilized in such varied ways that they often have very different meanings. this is not merely a matter of 'semantics' since these varied conceptualizations often lead to radically different theories and practises in determinate concrete situations, rather than being a question of semantics this is a theoretical divergence which at least in the first instance centers on what althusser calls problematics. that is the underlying structure of knowledge which renders possible the raising of certain questions in a particular form while ruling out certain other questions as unsuitable. to ask questions (even the right ones) is not the same as answering them. yet one's theoretical perspective is very much a reflection of one's problematic. following from this, the main questions i wish to raise, concern the theoretical status of the concept mode of production and the manner in which it exists in actu within concrete social formations given, specific conditions of existence (material conditions) and specific class struggle or class struggles, social relations and a specific historical conjuncture. within the context of modes of production it seems that many of the varying positions and differences of opinion arise precisely from the manner in which the concept is employed and 104 questions are posed. as cardoso points out, marx, from whom the concept mode of production is derived was himself less than instructive since he used "mode of production" ambiguously encompassing at least three distinct meanings (with possible combinations): the first refers in a descriptive way simplyto ways of producing; the second to a series of modes of production which become dominant in particular regions and periods and which define "progressive epochs" in the evolution of history (e.g. feudalism and capitalism); and thirdly, secondary modes of production which never become dominant "e.g. petty bourgeois modes, peasant small-holding modes". one can clearly recongize all three tendencies in marx but i do not agree with cardoso's conclusion that one must move from such a categorization to the concrete study of the evolutionary process of the totality of the european mediterranean area in order to tathom capitalism as the first universal mode of production which then dissolves previous modes of production." rather i believe one must begin with a reading which spells out the relation between the whole and its parts , as althusser proposes in this case between a dominant and other modes of production. before doing so, it is necessary to provide a definition of a mode of production at the most abstract level. i believe that with some modifications the basic problematic proposed by balibar can be retained. following the classic althusserian conception one can discern a pattern of invariants encompassing: 1) labourer (always labour power within the cm. p.); 2) means of production (the object and instruments [means} of labour) 3) non-labourer (appropriating surplus value in one or more of its component parts). these invariants are held together by two connections (relations), 1) relations of real appropriation, and 2) relations of property. the former refers to the appropriation of nature by man, or the real material appropriation of the means of production by the producer in the labour process, i.e. the production process. this concept approximates the classical marxist notion of forces of production encompassing raw materials and other subjects of labour, the labour process and object of labour (commodities) but explicitly manifests effects on the other (superstructural) elements. within the context used relation 1) also refers to the ability and skill of the non-worker appropridting surplus to set the labour process in motion. 105 the latter (property) relation in the combination, refers to more than legal property, rather it includes use/enjoyment as well as (legal) "property strictly speaking", the process of exploitation of labour within the ensemble of social and technical relations. it approximates relations 3 of production, as used in capital . balibar then goes on to complete the picture by introducing the concept of determination in the last instance by the economy. of the three inter-related structures, (otherwise called levels, elements , instances or moments ) economic, political-legal, ideological the economy is determinant in that it determines which of the instances of the social structure occupies the dominant place. dominance refers back to althusser's definition of over-determination... "it is the manifestation of the structure in dominance that unifies the whole. this reflection of the conditions of existence of the contradiction within itself, this reflection of the structure articulated in dominance that constitutes the unity of the complex whole within each contradiction , this is the most profound characteristic of the marxist dialectic." 5 the structure in dominance then provides the main determinant of the effectivity of material conditions and defines the primary conditions of existence of class struggle and other social forms. determination in the last instance, must be interpreted as determination by 'economic' material conditions, through a dominant instance. as balibar states in his self criticism. "the economic aspect (the 'economic' class struggle) is only one of these aspects cof class struggle], unevenly developed, unevenly decisive according to historical conjunctures, and never capable of producing revolutionary effects by itself . which by no means rules out , but on the contrary demands that in all historical periods , whatever the dominant mode of production and whatever the conjuncture, the ensemble of the class struggle is still determined by the 'economic' material conditions. "^ that is, the structures, define the conditions of existence of a class struggle which expresses an effectivity at the level of a transformation of the structures. change is never necessary in a teleological sense but 106 mutually conditioned and determined by the ongoing process of the structures combined with the specific events of class struggle. as pouiantzas points out each structure operates in its own connected yet distinct 'region' of practise, within a mode of production. the political exists as a specific level but also as the crucial level in which the contradictions of a social formation are reflected and condensed. political practise has as its specific object the present moment, the nodal point where the contradictions of the various levels of a formation are condensed in the complex relations governed by overdetermination and by their dislocation and uneven development. the problem of state power arises inside the structure of several levels dislocated by uneven development. the state has the particular function of constituting the factor of cohesion between the levels of a social formation. the struggle for control of the state, class struggle, operates along complex lines of development. following gramsci, pouiantzas posits dominant classes with specific hegemonic fractions engaged in compromises and power alliances with popular classes and fractions, whose power is reflected in ideological and repressive state apparatuses, generally reflected by the reigning class (upper levels of the state and corporate bureaucratic hierarchy) and manifested in all the structural levels especially ideology. for pouiantzas, unlike gramsci, agents are tied to the reproduction of the positions occupied by a social class. "we are faced with a series of relations between apparatuses, whose roots are deep in the class struggle. in other words the primary distribution of agents is tied to the primary reproduction of the positions occupied by social classes. according to the stages and phases of the social formation, that primary distribution assigns to a given apparatus or series of apparatuses its own proper role which it is to play in distributing agents."' during a revolutionary conjuncture or period of transition the possibility exists for radical changes in the primary distribution of agents and the role of the various apparatuses in the distribution of agents may in fact be drastically altered or in extreme cases the apparatuses themselves eliminated. 107 further elaboration of the concept of mode of production can now be made on the basis of these formulations. hindess and hirst very clearly define the structure of the unity of the two relations (property and real appropriation). they define mode of production as an articulated combination of relations of production and forces of production structured 8 by the dominance of relations of production. relations of production, define a specific mode of appropriation of surplus labour and the specific form of social distribution of the means of production corresponding to that mode of appropriation of surplus labour. furthermore the distribution of agents to the positions labourer/non-labourer is seen as a function of the social distribution of the means of production. in fairness to hindess and hirst they do not attempt to do this outside of their rather inclusive study of specific modes of production. hindess and hirst specifically define forces of production as the subject of work (raw materials, etc.), the labour process (personal activity of man) and its instruments. this is a vast inprovement over the all too prevalent ambiguity in the use of the term production by many marxists. for example "pierre-philippe rey quotes a passage from marx wherein the term production is used in a context referring to mode of production. this is not clear in rey's presentation where this term might easily be mistaken for productive forces. "in all forms of society, it is a determined production and the relations engendered by it which assigns to all other productions and relations engendered by them, their level and their importance. "9 similarly terray even more incorrectly posits that the instruments of labour are determinant in the enumeration and identification of the indices of a mode of production present, i.e. the order of investigation hindess and hirst wisely ignore terray' s formulation and extend that of rey to preclude any definition of forces of relations of production independently of the mode of production in which they are combined. yet despite their apropos criticisms of certain technicist notions, hindess and hirst carry their articulated combination of forces and relations of production too far, i.e. to the point of denying the specific effectivity of forces of production 108 as a social relation. in their attempt to deduce the productive forces from the concept of mode of appropriation, hindess and hirst establish a direct relationship between mode of appropriation, dominant instance and class struggle which bypasses the forces of production subsumed in this articulated combination, and denegates the labour process. in such a forroalistic deductive connection the possibility of a contradictory relation between the forces and relations of production virtually disappears in the articulated combination such that it is hard to envisage how such a construct can avoid reproducing its conditions of existence. ** more will be said on this in relation to the question of transition and class struggle. to avoid possible ambiguities it is necessary to clearly define relations of production. as mentioned such a definition must include appropriation of the product or some portion of it by the labourer and appropriation of the surplus labour by the non-labourer. following poulantzas . relations of production in class society, can be viewed as a double relation encompassing man's relations to nature in material production. "these two relations are relations first between men and other men class relations, and secondly between the agents of production and the object and means of labour the productive forces. these two relations thus concern the relation of the non-worker (the owner-director) to the object and means of labour. these relations involve two aspects (a) economic ownership: by this is meant the real economic control of the means of production, i.e. the power to assign the means of production to given uses and so to dispose of the products obtained (b) possession: by this is meant the capacity to put the means of production into operation."12 ernesto laclau, posits a similar hierarchical definition of a means of production as an "integrated complex of social productive forces and relations linked to a determinate type of ownership of the mean^ of production ownership of means of production are essential relations among the ensemble of relations of production. logically and mutually co-ordiri one will be able to discern quite clearly the presence of essential elements of two distinct modes of production. in such cases the dominant mode of production is demarcated by its more or less hegemonic control of productive property and productive relations albeit often in rather bastardized forms. such articulated modes ay in fact be particularly resilient and long lasting. in the case of domestic manufacture predominating in a social formation one finds predominant capitalist freehold property, bourgeois law combined with artisanal production carried out by direct producers (perhaps cottars) still in possession of most of their own means of production and a situation where merchants and usurers capital fulfills the directive functions and mediates between production and exchange. such social formations (common in eighteenth century europe) are not yet entirely capitalist, in fact metayage may still exist in widespread form, but they are for the most part dominated by capitalist institutions (even if sometimes of a perfunctory nature) capitalist relations of production and a capitalist state i.e. one controled primarily in the interests (if not by) a bourgeoisie. i would characterize 12? such a conjuncture as capitalist at the point at which the predominant mode of appropriation of surplus takes place within predominantly capitalist relations of exchange and social relations. the actual forms that the transformation of productive and corresponding superstructural relations take depend on specific internal and external contradictions of the the social formation delineating its conditions of existence and the actual course of class struggle witnin such prescribed limits. the third transitional conjuncture involves a multiplicity of more than two modes and forms of production which can again be expressed in terms of dominance set by the economic level but where direct state intervention would seem to be necessary to stabilize such a complex articulation in order that the dominant relations of production might reproduce themselves. for example in 192i lenin periodized soviet russia in terms of five separate modes and forms of production wherein the collective ownership of the means of production provided the determinant level but one which could only structure articulation of the social formation through the state and political practise. multiple contradictions within the varied elements existed which could have possibly served to undermine socialism of various points, one could in fact argue that this is what happened under stalin. but at any rate the main, point i wish to make is only that new productive forces were not immediately forthcoming as an inevitable result of changed relations production. such correspondance can only come about through struggle at the level of all existing social relations which is necessary because the outcome of such struggle while prescribed within certain limits is in no way pre-determined in any strict sense. in summary then actual transition does not constitute a new separate mode of production but a dislocated state of an articulated combination of modes of production (diachrony) where one mode is dominant. in practise the boundaries can be obscure, capricious and relatively undefined, but i prefer this uncertainty to positing a transitional mode which undermines mode of production as a theoretical concept. in concrete terms the actual transition is defined by a non-inevitable class struggle between the major 128 classes and fractions so the co-existing modes and forms of production which takes place at different levels and reflects the structural and superstructural totality. the state manifests itself as the region of condensation of the levels, but control of the state does represent a complex and possibly long and arduous accession to power. a further problem involves the generally contradictory nature of articulation of m.p.'s. can synchrony as a concept exist outside of tendencies toward transition? the answer i believe does not lie simply within the realm of theory. as i have said transition depends on determinate class struggle within the structural complexity of a mode of production or more generally a social formation. unique circumstances with their own causal specificity and relative autonomy play an important part at the level of concrete conjunctures. it is at this level that factors such as geography, climate, demography, personality, etc. come into play. they are never isolated from the structural complexity but neither are they simply or unilaterally determined by it or subsumed within it. thus the concrete conjuncture must be separated from social formation as a threoretical construct and should be seen not merely as possible outcomes predetermined by the structures but also as outcomes derived from the give and take of actual class struggle. 129 footnotes 1. callinicos, n., althusser 's marxism , p. 34, pluto fress , london, 1976. 2. cardoso, c.f.s., "colonial modes of production", critique of anthropology , nos. 4 and 5, autumn, 1975. 3. balibar, etienne in reading capital (b. brewster, trans), new left books, london, 1970. althusser, louis, pages 209-253. 4. another level theoretical is sometimes introduced but for methodological reasons beyond this essay i reject althusser 's distinction between theory and ideology and thus i leave it out for my purposes here. my reasons for doing so are grounded in what 1 take to be althusser 's fundamental demarcation of scientific work as the activity of generality ii, theoretical concepts on generality i ideological representations. for example marx's concept of mode of production could be applied to the representations of a particular social formation to produce scientific theory. whether this theory would have a specific effectivit^y from the ideological instance and thus would constitute a transformative element cannot be posited in a mechanical fashion and would very much depend upon the particular historical conjuncture, and it is the conjuncture which is at issue here. if as althusser maintains "the knowledge effect is the appropriation of the real object" then the real object of revolutionary theory must be revolutionary politics and the two cannot be separated as althusser would at times maintain. 5. balibar, e. , op. cit ., p. 224. althusser, l. for marx , allen lane, (b. brewster, trans), 1969, p. 200. 6. balibar, etienne, "self criticism: an answer to questions from 'theoretical practise"' in theoretical practise , no. 7/8 january 1973. 7. poulantzas, nicos, folitical power and social classes (t. o'hagan, trans), new left books, london, 1973, 12, 13, 40, 42, "on social classes", new left review , p. 54. 8. hindess, b. hirst, p.q., pre-capitalist modes of production , routledge and kegan paul, london, 1375, p. 125. 9. rey, pierre-philippe, les alliances de classes , my translation, p. 22, maspero, paris, 1973. 10. cf. balibar, e., in althusser and balibar, op. cit. , 1970, p. 235. 11. gareth stedman-jor.es, "modes of production workshop", communist university of cambridge, april, 25, 1976. 12. poulantzas, niccs, "cn social classes", p. 28, new left feview , no. tj-. 13. laclau, ernesto, "feudalism and capitalism in latin america, new left review , no. 67, kay-june, 1971, p. 33. 130 m. in cases where the technical conditions of existence for a new mode of production come into existence before the social relations of production, this does not necessitate transition but might facilitate such an historical process given a suitable conjuncture. an example of such a conjuncture could be china during the period of the warring states or tokugawa japan. 15. poulantzas, n., op. cit ., 1973, p. 63, footnote 8. 16. ibid. , p. 63. 17. ibid. , p. 64. 18. ibid. , p. 66. 19. j:n>ia.^;-p..i5.^?i}7> hindess and hirst, op. cit. , p. 31. 21. ibid. , p. 15. 22. cf. rey p.p., op. cit. , postscript. 23. poulantzas, n., op. cit. , 1973, p. 15. 24. ibid. , p. 15. 25. poulantzas, n., "on social classes" in new left review , p. 33. 26. godelier, maurice, "on the definition of a social formation" critique of anthropology , no. 1, spring 1974, p. 63. 27. rey, p.p. "the linneage mode of production", critique of anthropology no. 3, spring 1975. 28. balibar, e. in theoretical practise , op. cit. p. 64. 29. ibid. , p. 69. 30. balibar, e., op. cit. 1970, p. 297. 31. ibid. , p. 304. 32. ibid. , p. 305 33. ibid. , p. 306-307 carleton university symposium: braverman and beyond introduction by john myles in a period when the intellectual division of labour is intensifying, it is rare to find a work which is generally acclaimed as being "important", much less read, by social scientists representing a wide range of disciplines and specialties. such a work is harry braverman's labor and monopoly capital and it is for this reason that braverman's analysis of "the degradation of work in the twentieth century" was selected as the topic for a special symposium held at carleton university in the fall of 1977, a summary of which appears in the following pages. the centerpiece of the symposium was an address delivered by michael burawoy, assistant professor of sociology at the university of california, berkeley. it is reprinted in this volume under the title: "between marxist orthodoxy and critical theory: comments on braverman's labor and monopoly capital" . the paper presents in summary form the major points developed in a much longer manuscript made available to the participants beforehand. a subsequent revision which in manuscript form runs to 119 pages is forthcoming in politics and society (vol. 8, no. 4). in agreeing to prepare this paper for the symposium, burawoy accepted the difficult and challenging task of critiquing braverman from within the perspective of marxist analysis. the widespread acclaim with which braverman's work has been met makes this task all the more crucial. as with any great work, it stands in danger of being accepted as the last word on its subject matter, thereby becoming an impediment alternate routes rather than an impetus to further theoretical and empirical analysis. burawoy comes well qualified for his task. his discussion of braverman, which is mainly pitched at a theoretical level, is informed by his own experience and research in a chicago factory, the results of which are to appear in a forthcoming book entitled the production of consent on the shop floor, 1945 1975: the labor process under monopoly capitalism . perhaps more than any other contemporary work, braverman 's labor and monopoly capital reflects the vitality and relevance of the recent resurgence of marxist analysis in north american sociology. the seeds which braverman has planted, however, will wither and die unless nurtured in an atmosphere of intellectual struggle and debate. accordingly the participants in the symposium were deliberately encouraged to confront one another and avoid the unfortunate practice of avoiding points of disagreement which often passes for academic good manners and professional respect. as will be apparent, the discussants of burawoy 's paper fulfilled their mandate admirably. the most extensive replies came from leo panitch and donald swartz who, like burawoy, take their position from within the marxist perspective. john porter's comments, on the other hand, are probably representative of those sociologists who have been profoundly impressed by braverman 's work without accepting his marxist frame of reference. it is hoped that the presentation of the carleton debate in this issue of alternate routes will encourage more of the same elsewhere. | 223 an interview with pat armstrong canadian health care: privatization and gendered labour priscillia lefebvre is a collaborative ph .d . student at the department of sociology and anthropology/institute of political economy, carleton university (ottawa, canada) . pat armstrong is professor of sociology and women’s studies at york university (toronto, canada) . she held a chsrf/cihr chair in health services and nursing research, focused on gender and chaired the group women and health care reform for more than a decade . she has published on a wide range of issues related to gender, health care and work . pat was interviewed by priscillia lefebvre over august 2011 . priscillia lefebvre (pl): a large focus on your research seems to be the ways in which gender and labour intersect from the vantage point of health care delivery. what have been the main influences that have affected the trajectory of your research in terms of a feminist rooted political economy approach? why is this approach so important in understanding the contradictions that exist regarding the role of women within health care? pat armstrong (pa): it is difficult to identify the main influences on my thinking and research. growing up in a family where community involvement was not only encouraged but required meant seeking engagement at university. also, the red tory approach in our household did not fit so comfortably with the marx i read as a student in the 1960s or with the growing feminist movement i participated in. as juliet mitchell1 explained, marx was not good about women and did not provide a detailed blueprint for analysis, but he did offer a way to make systems transparent and to think about progressive change. in my reading of marx, work and the political economy are where the analysis should start because they are so powerful in shaping our lives; however, both productive and reproductive work have to be understood in historically specific ways and in ways that comprehend contradictions as well as interrelations. indeed, contradictions can provide a basis for creating alternatives. starting with power and economic forces did not imply ignoring ideas, discourses and cultural practices, but it did put those ideas, often blamed for an interview with pat armstrong canadian health care: privatization and gendered labour 224 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times women’s subordination, into a context that allowed us to see the power embedded in them and in their reproduction. furthermore, starting with the political economy did not mean ignoring gender and other basis for inequities. rather, as we are argued in the 1970s and 1980s, gender had to be theorized at the highest level of abstraction if we are to think through the implications for change in our lives. this relates, in turn, to another influence, which was involvement in student and other politics. my feminist political economy approach develops in such practices, as well as through engagement with other academics. canadian studies at carleton university in the early 1970s provided fertile ground for the further development of my ideas about political economy with a clearly canadian twist and so has my continuing policy work. as i became increasingly interested in feminist issues, i abandoned a thesis on the class origins of student activists and focused instead on women’s paid and unpaid work. the result was the double ghetto; canadian women and their segregated work,2 a joint project with my partner hugh armstrong, as is much of my research . when our daughter broke her leg and ended up in the hospital for weeks, we realized that health care covered all aspects of women’s work. paid and unpaid work overlapped in obvious and gendered ways, as the staff told me, but not hugh, where i could get our daughter juice and empty the bed pan. there were unionized and non-union workers, full, part-time and casual jobs, work defined as highly skilled and jobs defined as unskilled, occupations dominated by women classified as managerial, clerical, professional, and service, with many women from racialized and/ or immigrant groups. what it took us longer to realize but what we should have realized as political economists was that health care provides a unique context and required us to learn about a wider range of forces, policies and practices in care. women are not only the majority of workers, but also the majority of patients and of those who take others for care, creating complicated and often contradictory gender relations. equally important from our perspective, health care in canada offers a clear example of how universal programmes can create social solidarity by demonstrating the impact of collective action. what a political economy approach allows us to do is think through the ways work, gender and other inequities intersect, to explore the ways economic and political forces shape not only services and employment, but | 225 also ideas, and to bring together the complexity of work relations within this specific historical context. this approach also helps us see the contradictions in, for example, nurses fighting to distance themselves from links with women’s caring.3 pl: in a previous article published in a 1983 special edition of alternate routes1, you outline the problematic nature of quantitative data analysis as gender-blind. since then, you have been involved in several working groups, including the national coordinating group on health care reform and women (now women and health care reform), dedicated to researching health care reform policies and their impact on women both as health care providers and recipients. in your experience, what have been the greatest research challenges in gathering information on gender and sex differences within health care in canada? in your opinion, what needs to be explored further? pa: in my view, many of the challenges remain the same. there are still problems with the way data are collected and categorized, with the failure to collect some kinds of data and a further problem with the way the data are analyzed and with what gets accepted as good science. in too many cases, quantitative data are still seen as providing the truth and the whole truth, while qualitative data are too often treated as suspect. especially in health care, there is a hierarchy of evidence in terms of what kinds of data are accepted as legitimate and worthy of attention with the meta-analysis of double-blind randomized clinical trials taken as the gold standard because they are assumed to remove all bias. yet numbers, and categories, continue to reflect values. one example from our recent research is the definition of industry.4 in the past, statistics canada defined industry as ‘where people work.’ thus, everyone who worked in hospital would be counted as working in the health care industry. now industry is defined as ‘who you work for,’ removing from health care all those whose jobs have been contracted out, most of whom are women and many of whom are from racialized groups. a second example comes from data on work-related violence.5 our interviews with women employed in long-term residential care indicate that many women fail to report violence, in part because they will be blamed, in part because they won’t be believed, and in part because it takes too much time. the result is underestimates of violence in the numbers. 1  beyond numbers: problems with quantitative data, by pat armstrong and hugh armstrong in alternate routes: a critical review, vol. 6. ottawa, ontario: carleton university, 1983. pages: 1-40. an interview with pat armstrong canadian health care: privatization and gendered labour 226 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times at the same time, research is still published that failed to collect data by sex, and even more frequently, without analyzing the data by sex or gender. most frequently, the approach to data collection and analysis makes it impossible to do a gender analysis. women and health care reform has illustrated the problem by looking at wait times for hip and knee surgery, demonstrating that we need to look at the entire patient journey to see the ways gender influences how long women wait and even whether or not women get the surgery they need.6 a mere comparison of the number of women who get surgery compared to the number of men tells us little about equity. as women and health care reform struggled to figure out how to ensure gender could be included as a criterion in meta-analysis such as cochrane reviews, we came to realize that in their attempt to ensure scientific validity such reviews sought to eliminate context. as a result, they eliminated gender and racialization because both are about social relations in context. in addition, new problems have arisen since we wrote that article. at the time statistics canada data were free and now much of it must be paid for. in the past, we could analyze the data in the way we saw fit. now for access to much of the original data, you apply for access and then you have to go through a data analysis centre where the analysis must be vetted. of course, the government has attacked the long-form census in general and a critical question for feminist in particular, the one that asked about unpaid work. does gender have an impact, and in what ways, needs to always be part of the question, whatever the research, but this lesson has still not been learned by far too many researchers and policy makers. so, what needs to be explored further is a huge question. in short, we have some more data by sex, but too little analysis by gender and too much faith in numbers. pl: much of your work focuses on the privatization of health care and its detrimental effects in terms of access to treatment and quality of care. in exposing privatization2 (p. 163), you outline the introduction of privatization measures to health care beginning with the majority conservative government in ontario in the mid-90s. given the current tory majority at the federal level and provincial inroads to privatization in ontario, do you see this as a particularly critical time in defending health care as a public good, rather than a competitive market com2 bernier, kay wilson, karen r. grant, and ann pederson. toronto, ontario: university of toronto press, 2001. $24.76 cdn, paper. isbn-13: 978-1551930374. pages: 1-310. | 227 modity? what are your thoughts regarding stephen harper’s recent statement that, although the federal conservatives have no plans to go private, he cannot control the kinds of alternative delivery models used at the provincial level? pa: the best defence of public health care is popular support and we need to mobilize that support more than ever because we are facing a huge threat. the biggest threat now, in my view, is not costs but further privatization in all its forms. those pushing for privatization know that medicare is canada’s best loved social programme and so have privatized by stealth, always promising public payment. they have claimed there is a crisis and that health care cannot be sustained; that it must be radically transformed in order to save it. fear is a powerful force, especially when your health is at stake. our biggest problem in defending public care is complexity and the difficulty of getting people to understand why it is wrong to have forprofit delivery, even if the money comes from the public purse rather than from private payment, and why health care is as sustainable as we want it to be. i think the federal government will be very crafty while promoting deep privatization. it will negotiate individually with provinces and territories, allowing them to go their own way and blame the consequences on them. of course, the prime minister can stop that. monique begin did when she was minister of health and welfare. but prime minister harper will not intervene, so we need to put pressure at the local level and keep educating people about the perils of profits in care. if we do not stop this erosion soon, it will be too late. pl: in your opinion, how harmful are agreements such as the canadaeuropean union comprehensive economic and trade agreement (eu-ceta) to canadian health care and how are women affected in particular? pa: in many ways, these new agreements have much the same impact as earlier ones and have particularly negative consequences for women as a group and for particular groups of women.7 the agreements are written to promote profit and limit governments’ capacity to shape their own economies and public policies. it is much harder to influence policies if governments are prohibited from acting in the public’s interests and are instead forced to act in the interests of global profits. because more women than men depend on the state for services, financial support, jobs and protections against things like violence at work, agreements that limit or prevent governments from an interview with pat armstrong canadian health care: privatization and gendered labour 228 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times regulating, protecting, and providing have a particularly negative impact on them. the result is likely to be greater inequities among women, as well as greater inequity between women and men. pl: labour disputes, in particular organized labour, have received much political attention recently. for example, in an unprecedented move, postal workers were recently legislated back to work on a lockout. do you consider the recent use of back to work legislation in both the private and public sectors as threatening to the collective bargaining rights of unions? also, how do you think these latest negotiations will affect the collective organization and labour struggles of health service workers (for example, nurses and home care workers)? pa: the attacks on labour are no surprise and it should be clear that attacks on unions in the public sector are attacks on women who make up the majority of unionized workers there. one factor that kept families going during the most recent economic crisis was women’s employment in the public sector in general.8 we are building up to massive cuts in the health sector, where four out of five workers are women and where one in five women works. those who keep their jobs are likely to see them get worse as privatization is pushed further. cutbacks in public pensions and benefits will also hurt these women, as well as their families. at the same time however, women employed in health care enjoy tremendous public support. if the unions in the public sector can come together and resist, we may see real limits on attacks from the government. few doubt these women work hard, few think they are overpaid or pandered to by their employers, so it is much harder to sell the line about being pampered employees or to promote the politics of envy with them, as has been done with other unionized workers. pl: finally, in critical to care3 (p. 53), you argue that much of the labour performed by women in health services is essential in terms of providing care, yet remains peripheral in terms of social and economic status. your research indicates that due to this gendered division of labour in health care women are the primary health care providers in canada, yet women hold very little decision making power when it comes to policy. also, not only is it highly gendered, it is highly racialized. in your opinion, to what extent has the introduction of state level initiatives, such as the foreign live-in caregiver program, 3  critical to care: the invisible women in health services, by pat armstrong, hugh armstrong, and krista scott-dixon. toronto, ontario: university of toronto press, 2008. $20.76 cdn, paper. isbn-13: 978-0802096081. pages: 1-176. | 229 perpetuated these inequities? also, even if such initiatives did not exist, how far do you think ‘within system’ efforts, such as changes to policy, will go in resolving these inequities? is a shift beyond the present political system also needed? pa: these are complicated questions and difficult to answer in part because i think there are contradictory policies and practices. universal health care has undoubtedly helped women, both as care providers and as those with care needs. women’s employment conditions are better in the public sector and they have more power there, in large measure because unions have been strong, but also because there are pressures within and outside government to respond to calls for human rights and to set an example as a model employer.9 initiatives such as pay and employment equity have helped make employment in the public sector more equitable than in the private sector. of course, these gains are precisely why there is pressure on governments to abandon these policies and to attack unions; attacks supported by many within governments. this is not to claim that health care has been equally accessible or that employment practices in the public sector have resulted in equity but we can demonstrate that women do better in the public sector than they do in the for-profit one. at the same time, the way health care has been organized and policies developed have in many ways reinforced not only women’s responsibilities for care, but also the inequities among women. this is happening increasingly with current reforms. nor is it to argue that we should try to return to some ‘good old days.’ those days were not all good and, in any case, they are gone. we are dealing with a new reality and ‘old’ means of undermining the gains we made. nevertheless, i think that we should struggle for government policies that promote equity. universal public daycare combined with more public homecare, for example, could help make the foreign live-in caregiver programme irrelevant. if workers in these services were unionized and supported by strong anti-racist programmes, it would help address some inequities. however, it is not sufficient, in my view, to rely on governments alone. we need strategies that address conditions of work and care within the voluntary and for-profit sectors as well, even while we work for public care. we also need strategies to change the power inequities within households. i agree, then, with the implications of your question that we need to shift beyond the system and that we need to connect multiple policies in and outside the state, but i think that it is still important to work to change public policies. an interview with pat armstrong canadian health care: privatization and gendered labour 230 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times notes 1 women’s estate by juliet mitchell. harmondsworth: penguin, 1971 and “marxism and women’s liberation” by juliet mitchell. social praxis 1(1):23-33. 2 the double ghetto: canadian women and their segregated work by pat armstrong and hugh armstrong. toronto: mcclelland and stewart, 1978. 3 “contradictions at work: struggles for control in canadian health care” by pat armstrong and hugh armstrong in morbid symptoms health under capitalism, edited by leo panitch and colin leys. 2009. pontypool: merlin press, pages 145-183 4 “doubtful data: why paradigms matter in counting the health-care labor force” by pat armstrong, hugh armstrong and kate laxer in. work in tumultuous times: critical perspectives , edited byvivian shalla and wallace clement. montreal and kingston: mcgill-queen’s university press, 2007 “precarious work, privatization, and the health care industry: the case of ancillary workers” . pat armstrong and kate laxer in precarious employment . understanding labour market insecurity in canada edited by leah vosko. montreal: mcgillqueen’s university press, 2006. 5 critical to care: the invisible women in health services, by pat armstrong, hugh armstrong, and krista scott-dixon. toronto, ontario: university of toronto press, 2008. $20.76 cdn, paper. isbn-13: 978-0802096081. pages: 1-176. 6 “waiting to wait: improving wait times evidence through gender-based analysis by beth jackson, ann pederson and madeline boscoe in women’s health . intersections of policy, research, and practice. edited by pat arsmtrong and jennifer deadman. toronto: women’s press, 2009. pages 35-52. 7 “trade agreements, home care and women’s health.” by olena hankivsky, marina morrow, pat armstrong, lindsay, galvin and holly grinvalds. ottawa: status of women in canada, 2004. 8 “women forced to work longer, harder, for less pay by pat armstrong in speaking truth to power edited by trish hennessey and ed finn. ottawa: ccpa, 2010. pages 7-14. 9 precarious work, privatization, and the health care industry: the case of ancillary workers” . pat armstrong and kate laxer in precarious employment . understanding labour market insecurity in canada edited by leah vosko. montreal: mcgill-queen’s university press, 2006. | 231 an interview with sut jhally articulation, cultural studies, and education justin paulson is an assistant professor of sociology at carleton university (ottawa, canada), where he teaches political economy and social theory . he recently co-edited capitalism and confrontation: critical perspectives. sut jhally is professor of communication at the university of massachusetts (massachusetts, u .s .a) and founder and executive director of the media education foundation . he is the author of numerous books, articles, and films on advertising, media, and culture . for more information, please visit his website: www .sutjhally .com . justin spoke with sut jhally on september 8, 2011 . justin paulson (jp): as you know, alternate routes was recently relaunched after several years of dormancy, and we are quite pleased to have the opportunity to hear from you again. you were not only one of the first contributors to ar (vol. 3, 1979), but i understand that the journal also carried your first publication as a scholar? sut jhally (sj): yes, that’s why alternate routes has always held a very fond place in my heart. i was a master’s student in sociology at the university of victoria, and this was the very first thing that i had published. i remember having to provide a copy-ready piece to the journal, and because this was before the age of computers, a secretary had to type up my paper. the process was just very different than today, and reflects how the practices of intellectual life have changed over the last 30 years–from a time when almost every thing was written by hand, and then someone typed it, to a situation now where writing by hand is almost non-existent, and everyone types straight into a computer. and i think that is a very significant change. i remember talking to stuart hall about this a few years ago, and he believed that writing on a computer had actually negatively affected the quality of his prose. his reasoning was that using a typewriter makes major corrections difficult, so you really had to think carefully about sentence construction, etc., before committing it to paper. whereas with computers, you just write down your first conceptualization, knowing you can always change it later on. the problem is, once un-thoughtful stuff is in some (if only virtual) form, that becomes the starting point for both theorizing and writing. an interview with sut jhally articulation, cultural studies, and education 232 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times jp: let’s talk about that early piece for a minute. in “marxism and underdevelopment: the modes of production debate,” you reviewed the debates of the 1970s on what constitute the modes of production and how societies transition to capitalism. on the face of it, your work since then took you in a very different direction: you are well-known today as a leading media critic and an expert in cultural studies. but i’m wondering how, or if, this early publication nevertheless helped to shape your future direction as a scholar. do you ever find yourself taking up such theoretical debates in your more recent work, or in your teaching? sj: although i didn’t really follow up on the specific content of that piece–i haven’t written about underdevelopment or international relations since that time, in fact–i think the broader problematic that they were located in has never gone away. there is a very key theoretical term–“articulation”– that has been important to me, and to the debates in cultural studies in general, that is infused throughout the article. so when i teach these issues today, for example in a graduate class i teach on the cultural studies theorist, stuart hall, i refer back to the frank-laclau debate as the first time that i really came across the term articulation, and the modes of production debate as really one of the first places that it was used to theorize relations between things that seem separate but are connected in some way, a way to talk about sameness and difference. jp: i’m reminded of hall’s working paper from the mid-70s on marx’s 1857 introduction to the grundrisse, which touched on similar issues. were you influenced by that as well? sj: absolutely. what i find interesting right now is that the modes of production debate that focused around articulation led laclau then to move from thinking about modes of production within a social formation, to thinking about the relationship between different levels of the social formation (between culture and politics and economics, etc.) and he really became, along with chantal mouffe, one of the leading theorists in how to conceptualize that question. but the first place he dealt with this was not in the realm of politics, culture or social movements, which is where he ended up, but in the articulation between much larger structures. hall also has a 1980 piece “race, articulation and societies structured in dominance” where articulation is employed in an analysis of modes of production, colonialism and neo-colonialism. so i always refer back to this kind of forgotten genesis of articulation, that it actually really emerged in | 233 another place and then went from the modes of production debate to becoming a central conceptual piece within western marxism to talk about social movements and culture, politics, the state, etc. so, going back to your original question, although i haven’t really bumped into the same themes in content, conceptually i think i have retained that interest in how to conceptualize connection. jp: i wonder if we ought to go full circle and bring the concept of articulation back into conversation with political economy. sj: actually, that is my trajectory into these issues, because my first cut into media studies per se, in the realm of communication specifically (rather than through sociology, for example), came though the work of dallas smythe, who was a canadian communication theorist teaching at simon fraser. he argued that marxism had a “blind spot” when it came to communication in that it regarded the media as principally an ideological institution, whereas it’s really an economic institution. so he wanted to re-think within the marxist tradition how media should be properly conceptualized. because at that time, and we’re talking in the late 1970s, within political economy the media were still largely regarded as ideological institutions that were functional to the state, that were functional to the reproductive process of capitalism. what dallas argued was that instead, we should think about them first as economic institutions that produce surplus in and of themselves, but then also look at the role they play in the circulation and distribution of commodities. and in this understanding advertising was absolutely fundamental. so that was really the first time i started to think about advertising. and it was the same problematic of part-whole understandings, of how to understand what seems to be secondary and peripheral in terms of its place within the entire system. looking back, actually at around the same time i got interested in the debates that were taking place in cultural studies, through the working papers series of the birmingham centre, about how women’s domestic work, housework, should be understood in economic terms. was housework part of wage labor? was it separate from wage labor? did it produce value? essentially it was asking those same questions, which is ‘what’s the relationship between this activity, which seems to be not an economic activity or a key economic activity, and what people thought was real economic activity in the workplace?’ again, the same set of questions as the modes of production debate. are housework and wage labor the same? are they different? what’s the an interview with sut jhally articulation, cultural studies, and education 234 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times connection between them? what’s the articulation between them? that was really interesting to me, and then from that i started to think about advertising within the context of all this material i was reading about the relationships between things that seem different but are connected. that was what the modes of production debate was really about. so as i said, the content of it certainly didn’t stick but the general kind of conceptual questions that were raised have remained with me since then, and partly i think they remain with me because they were always central to cultural studies. jp: could you talk a little bit about the concept of critique that you worked with? the 1979 essay operated within a particular framework, yet also subjected that framework to significant criticism. in one sense this is the true meaning of critique, but it also strikes me as somewhat distinct from our academic publishing environment today, in which young scholars are too often content to simply denounce those who preceded them and move on–even if it means throwing the baby out with the bathwater. it’s less common to see students arguing that a particular framework is basically correct, and yet needs to be critiqued and improved for x or y reasons. have you noticed a change in the nature of critique over the thirty years you’ve been engaged in scholarship? sj: i’m not too sure i’ve seen it change a great deal because i think there have always been those different kinds of approaches to criticism, those different dimensions to it. what i do think exists is good critique and bad critique, and that has always been around. for me critique has to be productive, a kind of sympathetic critique, otherwise its just criticism. i don’t think you should be sympathetic to everything, i think there are some things that are just wrong and you need to say that they’re wrong. but in my view theory doesn’t proceed with giant steps. theory proceeds in small steps, and it proceeds on the shoulders of people who have gone before. i think that’s exactly how marx operated. he started his work with existing economic thinkers because that was the most developed work at that time. he didn’t say this was all wrong, he didn’t say classical economics was all wrong–he started there because he thought that was the most sophisticated understanding of where things were, but it didn’t get everything. and he proceeded to critique it in a pretty fundamental way. he called his work after all “a critique of political economy”. everything operates on the basis of what has gone before. | 235 i guess i take my intellectual lead here again from stuart hall, who i think has always had this kind of very generous way of reading theory–which is, you can evaluate literatures, you can evaluate people’s work, but if you want to move it on, let’s take the best of what’s there without rejecting everything. so, i think that’s the notion that i would urge young scholars to engage in. when i think back to when i was first a grad student, i think the piece that you refer to may be the first time where i was perhaps becoming more thoughtful and really trying to dig out what was useful in people’s work. it was only when i realized how much i didn’t know, how much we didn’t know, that’s when i think i started to develop a more mature view of intellectual work and research. not starting off with what you know you want to find out, but by really not knowing what it is you’re going to find out, really not knowing where you’re going to end up. if you know where you’re going to end up when you start doing research, i wouldn’t really call that research, i’d call that something else. so for me, open-mindedness, a kind of sympathetic view of what’s gone before is a key aspect of advancing knowledge. i am not saying that everything that’s gone on before is great, but taking the most productive aspects and moving theory on, one step at a time. i think that marx operates that way and i think that stuart hall operates that way–in this very, very sympathetic and productive way where you keep on theorizing, you don’t stop at any time and it’s a constant process of evaluating what’s there and moving on slowly. jp: i liked the way you framed that. i think you once noted that your interest in the question of determination is not based in political dogmatism, it’s simply in the nature of being a social scientist. and similarly you’ve argued that the function of universities is to train people to change the world in some way–not necessarily to offer them a pre-written script for how to do that, or to tell them what kind of world to change it into–but universities shouldn’t merely reproduce knowledge about the world nor merely train people for jobs. and this conviction has led you to become a public intellectual. but as a public intellectual based in the university, do you find much resistance to these principles? is the university changing in its ability to train students to think critically, and try to change the world in some way? is it becoming less receptive for criticism and praxis, and more about career training? sj: i think it depends on which university, and which sector of higher education you look at. there’s no doubt that the american univeran interview with sut jhally articulation, cultural studies, and education 236 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times sity is changing. public universities are becoming less public in that there is just less public money that goes into education now. and as that has dried up, what’s taken its place is corporate money, and so i think you’re seeing a kind of corporatization and a militarization of the university in terms of its funding that you never saw before. for example, at the university where i am there are essentially two campuses: there’s the sciences which have all the external research money (either corporate or federal) and then there’s the social sciences and humanities, and we’re very much the poor neighbours of the rich people who live up the hill. our function is essentially to teach people, and the function of the north side of the university is to bring in the money and do the research. and as public money is drying up, the nature of teaching is changing as well in that there are just less tenure track people and positions, with a lot of them being converted to adjunct positions, or to limited term positions. so there’s just a lack of stability on the employment side. i think tenure is fundamental to the intellectual life of a university in that it gives you the chance to experiment, it gives you the chance to take a risk, it gives you the opportunity to say things that might be unpopular in the classroom. and that aspect of academic life is changing, at least in the u.s. i don’t think that tenure is being taken away in some major way; it’s just being slowly eroded because there’s fewer of those kinds of positions. so the people who are teaching students these days, especially in the social sciences and humanities, don’t have the stability and the protection that they perhaps once would have had. and i think that is influencing both research and teaching. at the same time i think students are also changing in the sense that a post-secondary education is seen by many students as a necessity, and as training for a job. so there is a push for professional training, the push for something that’s practical, that will provide a more or less immediate return on the very large personal investment many students make in their education. there has of course always been an element of this, but i think the emphasis is increasing, and it’s really putting the notion of a “liberal education” under pressure, and changing the context within which we operate in the classroom. so i think we just have be much more aware of what we are doing in our pedagogy. teaching for me is a key component of being an intellectual (as important as research and writing). actually, it is a key component of being a public intellectual, because the public is not just out there | 237 beyond the ivory tower–the classroom is also a public space populated by people who do not read our disciplinary journals. these publications have an important role in our professional lives, but our scholarly articles are written for a particular audience of our colleagues that require a quite specialized, technical and sometime jargonistic language. so in that sense i think teaching is a vital practice for people who aspire to have some kind of “public” presence, who regard the function of knowledge as being broader than just job qualification. i think there is a sense that if you want to have this kind of more engaged public presence, you have to think beyond the walls of the academy. but there is a great opportunity within the academy to talk to people who you wouldn’t be otherwise able to reach, and to be able to get them to ask questions in a new way. now one of the questions you asked me was about the nature of critique, and how you engage that. i don’t think my job, especially in the classroom, is to tell people what to do–that’s their job to figure out, and will be driven by their own ethical and moral sense about their lives. that’s not a function that universities should engage in, to tell what people what kinds of political action they should take. i think our job is to get people to see the world as clearly as possible, and that in itself is a radical act. to see the world as clearly as possible in all its complexity and with the implications of why the world operates like it does, and then to say, look, the world isn’t just created, it doesn’t fall from heaven fully formed, it’s created by people, it’s created by interests, it’s created by human activity, and you can either be a bystander to that, or you can participate actively in the creation of the world in which you want to live. but if you’re a bystander, don’t tell me you’re not political, bystanders are also political, bystanders are essentially going along with the world the way it is. that is also a political statement. so what is the function of knowledge? it’s to destroy the illusion that people are somehow separate from the world. i want to destroy the illusion that people do not have a responsibility to the world. in my classes, when students leave i want them to think about what their moral responsibility is. my student evaluations at the end of the semester are quite interesting sometimes. one person wrote, “i guess it’s good to know this stuff, but i just wish i didn’t.” because ignorance is, literally, bliss. i think that should be the key intellectual function of universities, to destroy ignorance, and to give people real an interview with sut jhally articulation, cultural studies, and education 238 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times information and understandings about the world in which they live, and to empower them to be able to take a stance in and to the world. i’ll say to my students, “look, i’m not telling you what to do, you want to go and work in business, in corporations, then that’s fine, but be aware of what you’re doing, that you’re making a moral decision, an ethical decision, that you are going to participate in this system which we just spent a semester looking at. that the values of that system are now your values, you are not just going along blindly, you are now part of that.” that’s what i want to do, to empower people in terms of their own responsibilities and on the basis that they really understand the world as clearly as possible. beyond that i don’t think that’s there’s much we can, or even should do. but having said that, i think there’s a reason why a lot of students come out of universities with a different political viewpoint than when they went in. because the post-secondary sector, at least in the united states, is the last place in the culture where there is any kind of intellectual diversity left. the political culture is now totally bought up, it’s totally colonized, and there is no way that you can have any kind of real meaningful debate about fundamental things within the political sphere. that was one the most brilliant things that corporations figured out–we’ll take over not only the republican party, that’s our traditional party, but we’ll take over the democratic party as well, and in that way take over the whole of politics. that is how corporate interests become the national interest. the political sphere is gone, the media sphere is gone, the public sphere is gone, the state is gone. the universities and colleges are the last place left, and that’s why they’re now coming under attack from the right wing, why they’re coming under attack from corporations– it’s an attempt to shut down the last bastion of seeming diversity. but it’s no accident that when young people are exposed to diversity, when they’re given opposing view points, it’s not surprising to me that they often think that those left wing progressive ideas actually make sense. that’s what always gives me hope, that the right is scared stiff of real debate, the right is scared stiff of real knowledge because they know the vast majority of people, if you presented things to them in a fair way, that the game of hegemony will be over. so they have to shut down that debate through monopoly. for those of us who are in the university, i think we are engaged in one of the last efforts of resistance to this corporate takeover. | 239 jp: and this was one of the insights of cultural studies, was it not? that most people aren’t simply stupid or beset with ‘false consciousness’, but that if given the opportunity to think critically, without proselytization by the party, that they will look somewhat askance at what’s going on in the world. sj: the question i would want to pose is “why do the majority of people vote solemnly every four years against their economic interests?” i don’t think that’s because they’re stupid, i think that’s because there are more aspects of people’s identities than just their economic identities. and the right has figured this out, and especially in the united states, has really made quite explicit appeals to racial identity. and i think that’s one of the things that marxists couldn’t quite figure out, that there are other things in people’s experiences were just as powerful, perhaps more powerful, than class. for them it was as people got poorer and poorer, the more radical they would become, the more the proletarian consciousness will rise. what that ignored was some of the key findings of cultural studies, that there is never a straightforward relationship between reality and peoples’ perception of that reality. that the perception of reality always goes through a cultural and symbolic filter, and if you can control that cultural and symbolic filter you can appeal to people on some other level, and tell a story about why they’re poor, and how the people to blame for why they’re poor aren’t capitalists but those filthy immigrants who have come and taken our jobs. this is what althusser called an “imaginary relationship of individuals to their real conditions of existence.” it is important to stress that it wasn’t a “false” relationship, but an imaginary one that audiences have to actively engage with, and there is no guarantee as to its success. however, i think sometimes cultural studies went too far on the active audience stuff, the idea that people are really active and you can’t control them. well, i think people are active, as human beings we are always active in the creation of meaning because there is never such a thing as natural meaning. meaning is always up for grabs, so the idea of an active audience is fundamentally built into the nature of us as human beings. but that doesn’t mean that active audiences can’t be controlled. the “imaginary relation” that we are encouraged to experience the world through can be a very powerful filter of control that talks to you, again in althusser’s terms it “interpellates” you in powerful ways, and leads you down a particular direction. an interview with sut jhally articulation, cultural studies, and education 240 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times in that way you can actively make meaning (actually i don’t know any other way you make meaning if not actively) but someone else can direct it because the conditions of interpretation are not of your own making. and that is why the institutions of public relations and advertising form such a large part of the work of control of modern society. unfortunately, cultural studies lurched for a time into a direction where that broader social, economic and cultural context of interpretation kind of disappeared, and what we got were lots of fan studies about pleasure, about why people were doing certain kinds of things, making certain kinds of meanings divorced from this broader structure. and i think that’s still the case. so i encourage graduate students to go back to the kinds of concerns that animated cultural studies in the original phase. for example the book policing the crisis, which i think is one of the seminal pieces that emerged out of cultural studies with a central focus on questions of articulation and of conjuncture, is in my mind an exemplary methodological and theoretical text. it starts off with the phenomena in the mid 1970s of british (english actually) judges starting to hand down these ridiculously lengthy jail sentences, twenty years, for what were very common crimes that used to be punished by a few years. and stuart hall and his colleagues at the birmingham centre for contemporary cultural studies started to ask, ‘what is going on here? why are black youth being treated in this way?’ and starting from these small incidents they teased out, theoretically and empirically, what was going on in society as a whole, that this was part of a new conjuncture, a new economicpolitical conjuncture that was responding to the changing imperial role of britain in global terms. hall argues that we are still in the hegemonic project that was birthed at that time: thatcherism was the first part, blair was the second , and now the conservative-liberal coalition is the third. jp: you’ve seen the reaction to the riots–someone was jailed three years for stealing a loaf of bread? sj: and four years for simply posting on facebook! again, we are in that moment where these sentences tell you something else about what’s going on. that was the brilliance of policing the crisis. they started off somewhere small and they ended up with a crisis of the whole society. that is the best kind of sociological work, empirically grounded and theoretically important. i think the best work | 241 has to be empirically grounded. we need theory, yes, but theory by itself is not enough. for me (and i might be unusual in this) theory only helps make sense of the world, helps make sense of something we could call reality. and for that you need to have other ways of linking theory up with the world: evidence. in my own work, and in my teaching, its always about evidence. i start off telling my students that they shouldn’t believe me, that i am just spinning them a story about the world and how it works. so how do we decide what is useful for explaining the world? how do we decide between different “theories”? well, that requires intellectual work. that requires research. that requires proof. i think that’s what c. wright mills called ‘the sociological imagination’. you need the sociological imagination. otherwise, you’re just in religion, you’re just in faith–“i think this is correct this because i believe it.” this is really relevant within the united states right now because there are actually questions about how best to understand the world: by a kind of rational, scientific view of the world, or a view of the world that just refuses that and is based on faith. it’s really a very, very worrying sign right now that the next president of the united states, if he’s one of the republican frontrunners, may not believe in science, won’t believe in evolution, doesn’t believe the science around climate change. jp: i don’t think the last one did, either. sj: well, the view on bush was that he was just a front, and that the people running behind him were much more rational. but there wasn’t this anti-scientific view that is really now so powerful within the mainstream of the republican party. and again, i don’t think that’s just an accident. it’s being created and spun through public relations and through ideological work. the fact that 40 percent of the population in the united states doesn’t believe that climate change is connected to human activity isn’t just because americans are stupid. it’s because there has been an immense amount of ideological work that has gone into constructing that as an opinion. jp: so thinking about teaching again, do you see the role of teaching in part to inoculate students against this kind of, what shall we call it, faith-based storytelling? sj: i think it actually is much more to do with an old-fashioned sense of what “liberal education” is, what learning is, and figuring out exactly how the world works in some kind of rational way. it is a commitment to a rational view of the world, it is a commitment to an interview with sut jhally articulation, cultural studies, and education 242 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times the enlightenment view of the world that for a long time we didn’t even question. what’s happening right now is that that view of the world is being questioned from both the right (who see the truth in faith) and the postmodernists who don’t see truth anywhere. at the very moment when we need scientific clarity to deal with the collapse of our physical and financial environment is the very moment when a commitment to that view of the world is eroding. jp: speaking of collapse, you argued in “advertising and the end of the world” that advertising would be responsible for destroying the world as we knew it in about ten years. it’s now more than a decade later, and the world seems to sputter on in some recognizable form. sj: what i think i said was that the environmental catastrophe would hit some 70 or 80 years down the road, but to avert it, we have to take action now, so that we have very little time left to deal with it. actually, given where we are in terms of climate change and the collapse of the oceans and fishing, 70 years may have optimistic! and while it is impossible to predict with any certainty when things will happen, i don’t think there is any doubt that they will happen. the actual crisis when we won’t be able to continue might be a long time coming, and will certainly happen after i am dead and my ashes scattered in the ocean. and yet to stop that crisis occurring then, we have to take action now. which is why i always use the metaphor (which i got from my doctoral advisor bill leiss) of the oil tanker, which because of its size and momentum has to start turning well before their seems to be any visible danger, heading towards the shore,. and that’s where we are right now. we have to make that change right now, even though the effects of it may not be felt for quite a while. i think that’s what some people call the “sunny day syndrome”. things seem to be fine, the sun is shining, the weather isn’t that extreme, you turn on your tap and water comes out of it, and right now we’re saying, “where’s the crisis?” and so you’ve got to have this long-term view of the world. which is very difficult to do. i mean, from an evolutionary perspective, we have never had to think about our actions that far into the future. most of the time through human history we’ve been, “okay, how do we survive until tomorrow? how do we get enough food now, and perhaps last us through the winter?” and so we’re actually, in one sense, going against eons of evolution, in terms of having to think that far into the future. and i think that’s the function of knowledge, and we have to evolve, or at least develop, a new way of thinking about ourselves. | 243 i think actually everything i said in “advertising and the end of the world” is quite accurate. the crises have just gotten worse and worse, our environmental crisis, our ecological crisis, just the resource crisis around oil. i mean when i first wrote “advertising at the edge of the apocalypse” peak oil wasn’t really a thing at that time. now we know we are in trouble around resources. we know that our oceans are in trouble, through acidification. we’re overfishing and fish are being made extinct by the day. our financial systems are collapsing. and i don’t think there’s any guarantee that the collapse of capitalism will led to socialism. as marx said, “the future could be either socialism or barbarism.” and i think there’s very strong evidence, and especially if this kind of the anti-scientific, faith-based view of the world is going to continue–i’m not sure it’s going to predominate, but it’s going to stop the political system from functioning properly–that our future may be barbarism. again in the article and film, i talked about how the cultural and intellectual ground on which we operate will determine how far into the future we can see and what we regard as important issues. to the extent that advertising remains the ground, it remains the environment within which we think about these things, all these questions, these long-term questions, they’re beyond the horizon, they’re beyond our capability to think about. and it’s partly also that advertising and marketing, to the extent that they are so fundamental to promoting expanding consumption, are pushing the environmental and resource collapse even faster. actually in the film i pointed to the depletion of the ozone layer as an indication of the coming catastrophe. but i think we can actually point to that as a way of showing what a possible solution may be, because the depletion of the ozone layer has partly been dealt with by taking collective action. by nations coming together and deciding to take collective action, and that’s exactly what we need. i think we’re at a time in the world where urgent action is needed. and one piece of advice i give to graduate students in particular is to concentrate your intellectual work on something that’s important, research something that’s connected to the world out there. don’t just do research on things that you find interesting in and of themselves. your work is part of this movement that needs to change how we look at things, and we all play small parts in that. what role are you going to play? for example, within communication, are you going an interview with sut jhally articulation, cultural studies, and education 244 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times to study (and i don’t mean to insult people) the ironic dimensions of the simpsons and the contradictions of postmodern ideology, or are you going to look at really something much more fundamental? are you going to look at, for example, how the simpsons and irony are used to paralyze people from actually taking action? because they think they are taking action by watching the simpsons, by laughing along at the irony. jp: before we wrap up, i’d like to ask you a bit about how you view your work with the media education foundation. with the rise of so much social media, is there a continued role for documentary films, the kinds of things that the media education foundation produces? is that going to have to change at some point, or will there still be a role for ‘old-fashioned’ films in the classroom? sj: well i hope there’s a role for it, because that’s how the media education foundation is going to survive, and i think there will be a role for it, but you have to watch things as they progress. classroom technology is changing, and it’s much easier now for people to be directly connected to the web when they are teaching. it’s easier for students to be connected too, and it’s one of the most maddening things teachers face these days–students who are on their cell phones and on laptops checking their facebook pages when they’re in class. but instructors also have access to this, and i think that will change things. you can go straight to a youtube clip to show something. and i think that’s a positive move forward. there’s more access to immediate knowledge, there are more possibilities for people to use things that are going to engage students. but i think we will continue to do serious documentaries, because at some point, you can’t just communicate through threeminute clips. at some point you need sustained intellectual attention to something to really understand it. and that’s actually one of the things i worry about most, is what is happening to our ability to engage in this sustained intellectual effort. can young people who have grown up in an internet age where everything is short, read a book of theory? can they read a book of research? do they have the ability to focus for how long it takes to read a book? can they sit in a lecture for an hour and a quarter, without being disrupted by having to check their email or twitter account? i know i sound like an old grump, and it is not because i am a reflexive luddite. but environment and context is everything in my book, and intellectual work requires sustained focus on one thing. but at the same time, i am not | 245 going to fight some defensive battle around this. if the new context requires shorter, snappier pieces, then that’s the language and form we will have to use. jp: would the shorter pieces be teasers for longer documentary films? sj: i don’t think so. i’m not sure if you’ve seen this animated piece that was produced in conjunction with a david harvey lecture called “the crisis of capitalism.” it is really quite wonderful and a great way to communicate complex ideas. you look at youtube, and the harvey lecture got a million and a half hits! and so i’m actually really interested in that as a model, experimenting with those kinds of techniques and those kinds of animation strategies to get people to think about—in two or three minute pieces–something like the healthcare system in the u.s. in a new way. can you get them to think about welfare in a new way? can you get them to think about immigration? i don’t know that it’s going to transform how people are thinking, but these are small ideas that will be seeds, i hope, to something else. you know i don’t really consider myself a film maker per se, even though that’s what i do these days. i’ve always considered myself an educator, and educators have to go wherever the action is. you have to go where the attention is. if the attention now is through facebook and social media sites and youtube etc. then i think we have to have a strategy for getting into that space. so i’m thinking, okay, how does mef really evolve beyond just making films for the classroom, which i want to keep doing, but also making things that will engage people where they are. and again, i think that’s the same question for progressive intellectuals about engaging in a public discourse, and the question of how you translate the work that you do into a form whereby a lay person, or a non specialist, could understand it. how do you translate high theoretical work into a form of exposition that can be comprehended by a smart and eager non-specialist? i think a lot of academics actually are very very bad at that, they haven’t really thought about how you speak to the public. there’s a lot of critique about the monopolization of the media and culture by the right and there is no doubt that those are vital questions. but i often wonder, if we had access to the mass of the people, what would we say that would engage them and move them to take action? would we be able to get them to pay attention, to engage with, interact with our ideas and our values? an interview with sut jhally articulation, cultural studies, and education 246 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times and i’m not too sure we would, because i don’t think we as academics have really thought about it a great deal. you go to an academic conference and you see the papers people present–a lot of them are unlistenable. i mean people literally read papers and sometimes say “oh i’ve got a 20 page paper i’ll just read until i run out of time!” they talk in really heavy theoretical ways, and you look around the room and most people are dozing off because they have no idea what people are talking about. for me, that’s just being lazy. i have to say that one of the things i do is to take every opportunity to speak really seriously. i always ask, “who’s my audience”, and then how do you communicate with that audience. if i’m talking to a group of heavy marxist theorists i’ll have one way of speaking, but if i’m talking to a group of 18 year old students who are interested in coming to the university you have to talk in a different way. if you talk to communication students who already are interested in these issues, and you’ve had them in a class before, you talk to them in a different way. that requires thought, it requires really thinking through, it actually requires having the viewpoint of an advertiser. advertisers are always interested in communication, they’re never interested in just exposure, they’re interested in communicating an idea. i wish more intellectuals were interested in the idea of communication, and of how you translate your work into a form where someone can actually understand it and can actually engage in it. they may not agree with it–that’s the nature of politics, there is no guarantee in politics–but engaging people is the goal. stuart hall argues that progressive intellectuals, organic intellectuals in gramsci’s language, have two responsibilities. the first is to understand the world better than anyone else. there’s no room for dogma in understanding the world. you have to understand it the best way you can. that may require specialist language, that may require high theory, that may require jargon. that’s the work of knowledge production. and then second, you have to think about how you translate that into a form where someone else can understand it? and although hall articulated this for me in a formal way, i think i already understood it instinctively right back at the beginning of my career when i was working on that alternate routes article, because i was reading marx’s grundrisse, his notebooks. and the grundrisse is literally unreadable and it’s unreadable because this is marx’s mind in operation, he is trying to work things out. | 247 jp: there’s a reason he didn’t publish the notebooks. sj: yes, absolutely. they are works in progress, where he was developing his analysis. some people have actually called them the mode of analysis. by contrast capital is the mode of exposition and it is beautifully written. it is a rhetorical tour de force. marx spent a long time writing capital (especially volume one) in a way that workers would be able to understand. and those are two different moments. i wish more intellectuals understood that the work of analysis is not the work of exposition, and that exposition takes time and effort. you have to really think about translation. again, i think that’s one of things that i did very early on, partly because i took teaching seriously. for me, teaching wasn’t just part of what i had to do, it was this opportunity to get in front of people who otherwise wouldn’t be exposed to these ideas. so once you’ve got that chance, how do you go about it? for me, the teaching, the research, the politics, is all very closely connected. that’s why i always say, the most important part of media education foundation is the “education” part: it’s media education foundation. what we’re trying to do is to take the best work that’s been done in the academy, and in line with what hall argues, in line with marx’s intellectual practice, to take the ivory tower of the intellectual mind into different places, to take it into hallways, into classrooms. take it into church basements, to community centres, take it into other places where people actually gather and where this vital debate has to take place. twenty-first century socialism and the global financial meltdown | 171 twenty-first century socialism and the global financial meltdown: in conversation with michael lebowitz — rebekah wetmore and ryan romard rebekah wetmore and ryan romard1 (rw/rr): the crisis of world capitalism starting in 2007 was the most severe crisis of capitalism since the great depression and thus far the recovery, both globally and within canada, has been weak at best. with this mind, to what extent is the current crisis cyclical and in what ways is this related to a broader, systemic crisis of the capitalist system? michael lebowitz2 (ml): this is not a question for which there is a quick answer. what do we mean by a crisis of capitalism? i distinguish between a crisis in capitalism and a crisis of capitalism. for me, there is only a crisis of capitalism when there is an organized and conscious subject prepared to put an end to capitalism. there are always crises, though, within capitalism. understanding this distinguishes a marxian perspective from the perspective of mainstream neoclassical economists for whom the normal state of capitalism is equilibrium and crises are aberrations. for marx and marxists, crises are inherent in capital’s tendency toward overaccumulation. it is inherent in the nature of capital that its orientation is to grow, to expand — to accumulate, accumulate! in a crisis, though, that process of accumulation is checked. all crises take the form initially of the inability of capital to realise the 1 rebekah wetmore is an independent researcher and community organizer. she has an ma in sociology from acadia university in wolfville, nova scotia. ryan romard is a ma candidate in sociology at acadia university. he studies the sociology of agriculture in cuba. 2 michael a. lebowitz is professor emeritus of economics at simon fraser university in vancouver, canada, and the author of, most recently, the socialist alternative: real human development, and the contradictions of “real socialism”: the conductor and the conducted. he was the director of the program in transformative practice and human development, centro internacional miranda, in caracas, venezuela, from 2006-11. 172 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism surplus value extracted from workers through exploitation in the process of production. if capital is unable to realise the surplus value which is contained within commodities through sale of those commodities, it will cut back on their production. and, the result is unemployment as well as reduced demand for investment—in other words, reduced demand for the sector producing means of production. growing unemployment in both the consumer goods sector and the sector producing means of production means that there will be greater difficulties in selling commodities. thus, the initial emergence of the inability to sell commodities brings with it a deepening crisis within capitalism. part of that deepening of the crisis involves a significant reduction in the values of capital — in the value of raw material stocks, for example, but especially what is called fictitious capital. by fictitious capital, we mean the capital invested in various vehicles which, while linked ultimately to the fortunes of real capital within the spheres of production and circulation, takes on a life of its own. for example, the values of shares in corporations (which have their real basis in the profitability of those corporations) expand significantly in the period of a boom. presumably, these values are related to expectations of that profitability but those stock values are determined instead by prospects of money to be made in the stock market. until the moment of truth, there comes a point as a crisis within the real economy emerges in which there is an enormous destruction of those values contained in this particular form of fictitious capital— i.e., a crisis of the stock market. and this is not the only form of fictitious capital. we’ve seen a great destruction of fictitious capital in the form of various financial instruments such as derivatives, etc. as well as real estate values. all of this has its impact and feeds back on the real, underlying economy to deepen a crisis. none of this explains why crises occur, though—why capital’s drive to expand comes up against barriers. in marx’s capital, he indicated that capital develops an ability to grow by leaps and bounds and comes up against no barriers except those presented by the availability of raw materials and the extent of sales outlets. both those barriers are the result of capital’s tendency for overaccumulation. in the case of the first, marx described how overaccumulation tends to be manifested in lagging production of raw materials and other products whose source is nature. agriculture and extractive industries such as mining, marx noted, are modes of production sui generis — they cannot be expanded in the same way as spheres of production which are users of raw materials. precisely for this reason, then, in an extended period of accumulation, capital often twenty-first century socialism and the global financial meltdown | 173 comes up against the problem of the rising value of raw materials with the result that a greater proportion of capital outlays must be for what is called constant capital. these will be periods in which the rate of profit tends to fall because overaccumulation in industry has as its counterpart underaccumulation in the production of raw materials. you can see my discussion of marx’s argument in ‘the general and the specific in marx’s theory of crisis’, which is reprinted in my book, following marx: method, critique and crisis. the second barrier that marx identified is rooted in the antagonistic conditions within which capital functions — in other words, in the nature of capitalist relations of production themselves (recall that marx stressed that the real barrier of capital is capital itself). capital’s drive to increase the rate of exploitation brings with it a tendency for its ability to produce more and more articles of consumption to come up against a barrier in terms of its ability to realise the surplus value contained in those commodities; this tendency for overproduction of capital often takes the form of intensification of capitalist competition. the begged question, though, is if a rising rate of exploitation is significant, why doesn’t the relatively increased share of income for capital lead to increased capitalist expenditures (investment and consumption)? the answer is that capitalists are not likely to expand productive capacity if there is already unused capacity in the productive sector (because of overaccumulation) and falling profit rates because of the burden of the high costs of raw materials. the situation is one in which workers can’t spend and capitalists won’t. it’s a situation when capitalists choose to place their funds elsewhere—in securities, real estate, etc. i have been describing a crisis which is essentially a cyclical crisis. cyclical crises, though, by definition don’t last. for one, the process of destruction of values can restore the conditions for resumption of profitable production. but crises can be more than cyclical; they can also be structural. when we talk about the overaccumulation of capital, it is essential to recognise that capital does not expand in unison. there is an inherent tendency toward unevenness: some capitals will be the major contributors to the growth and accumulation of capital while others may bear the brunt of the effects of overaccumulation. in particular, there are periods in which capital expands in new areas, new geographical regions, more rapidly than in the old regions of capitalist expansion. this process may reflect new, advanced productive forces (thus, better means of securing relative surplus value) or very high rates of exploitation based upon low real wages and a high length and intensity of work—and sometimes it 174 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism may be both modern techniques and very low wages. this emergence of new capitals and new forms of production provides a basis for a structural crisis — in other words, a crisis which is the result of the changing structure of capital. although it does not occur with the periodicity of a cyclical crisis, this definitely has happened before—in what was called the great depression in england in the latter part of the 19th century (as the result of the growth of production in germany and elsewhere on the continent as well as the us) and in the 1930s (after the growth of mass production in the us and the growth of the rate of exploitation in the 20s). crises in capitalism which embody both cyclical elements but also significant structural elements will be deeper and longer than those which only involve cyclical swings. further, structural crises may generate significant tensions because the change in the geographical locus of capital resulting from unevenness may lead to an attempt to redivide spheres of influence and power (and thus inter-imperialist rivalry). finally, their resolution may require a process of restructuring of capitalist institutions in order to incorporate the new elements and manage these new relations—the obvious case being the restructuring which occurred with the bretton woods agreements after the depression of the 30s and world war ii. i have been stressing this question of restructuring because it is obvious that the current crisis within capitalism is both cyclical and also structural in this sense. there’s been a very significant growth in productive capacity, an accumulation of capital, in centres such as china, south korea, india, brazil, etc. a significant part of the explanation of this process has been the enormous reserve armies of labour in the countryside which could be drawn upon for the expansion of wage labour within industry at wage rates well below the levels in the old capitalist centres. as a result, this has been a period marked by a rising rate of exploitation on a world scale and at the same time a rising demand for raw materials from these new expanding centres of capitalist accumulation (reflected in prosperity in raw material producing centres). both these characteristics tend to generate a crisis within world capitalism; however, within that general crisis, the unevenness is obvious. in the old centres of capital, we see that rather than the expansion of productive capital, money has flowed into finance and real estate; thus, one can speak accurately about the separation of finance capital from productive capital there (much like england’s shift toward rentier capitalism in the late 19th century). but there is more: in the context of capitalist competition and pressures upon profits we see that capital in twenty-first century socialism and the global financial meltdown | 175 these old centres has managed to insulate itself somewhat because of its success in shifting the tax burden to the working class—reducing taxes upon corporations and upon those with high income (who are described as the ‘job creators’). capital has been able to do this because the defeat of the working class in these centres. to describe, though, the growth of finance capital at the expense of productive capital as characteristic of this crisis in capitalism (and especially to see this as a sign of the crisis of capitalism) is an example of onesidedness (which happens to coincide with the location of those who come to this conclusion). it doesn’t look at all like a crisis of capitalism in china, vietnam, india, brazil etc. in short, what we are seeing is a change in the structure of world capitalism, and the attempt to manage the change in that structure is reflected in such developments as the shift from the g7 to the g20. will that restructuring of capital succeed? i suggest that, in the absence of the ability of the working class throughout the world to prevent it, capital will succeed in this as it has in the past. let me turn, though, to a question which you didn’t ask explicitly: is there anything in this existing situation which points to the ultimate, final crisis of capitalism? although there are many marxist economists who are predicting the end of capitalism (something marxist economists are prone to do), my perspective is somewhat different. it is obvious that there is a very serious problem of an emerging ecological crisis to which capital is contributing substantially. however, that is a crisis of humanity—not a crisis of capital. how and if this crisis of humanity can be prevented depends upon a serious movement of working people to put an end to capitalism by all means possible and as soon as possible. and that will be the crisis of capitalism. rw/rr: canada’s prime minister stephan harper has unashamedly promoted the myth that the financial crisis did not greatly affect canada. is this notion of canadian exceptionalism warranted? if not, what might the next couple of years be like for canadians, particularly in light of the recent austerity measures? ml: it is true that canada has not been as affected by the financial crisis as the united states. but that has really little to do with the actions of the harper government. in part, it reflects the difference in the nature of the banking system and the traditions of finance in canada. in part, too, it also reflects the difference in the risk orientation of canadians. but this is not a case of canadian exceptionalism at all. not unless you forget about 176 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism all those other exceptions like chile, ecuador, venezuela, brazil, and indeed all countries exporting raw materials to china and experiencing a boom based upon this. there have been two distinct tendencies affecting the canadian economy. one is the tendency related to the depression in the united states, given canada’s long-term dependence upon that market. the other tendency reflects the resource boom based upon exports to china and other asian countries. those two tendencies reflect the changing structure of world capitalism, and the geographical division involved is reproduced within canada itself. thus, provinces like québec and ontario, which have focused upon manufacturing, are suffering significantly whereas prairie provinces like alberta, saskatchewan and manitoba in particular have been benefiting from their resources. the harper government has thrown its lot in with the latter group of provinces and with the emerging new centres of capital. in its so-called budget bill, its determination to push through pipelines to serve china, its interest in chinese foreign investment, its removal of environmental protection measures, etc, we can see that it is placing a wager on the structural changes in capital. this strategy has major implications for the canadian economy. thomas mulcair of the ndp has raised the question of the ‘dutch disease’ — i.e., the blow to canadian manufacturing as a result of a rising value of the canadian dollar linked to resource exports. i think that’s a bit premature because we cannot say at this point how much of this particular decline is cyclical and how much is structural. however, over a long time period, i think it is correct to talk about the spectre of the dutch disease. the harper government strategy points in the direction of a new model — actually a return to the old model, that of the hewers of wood and drawers of water (i.e., to a hollowing-out of the economy similar to what happened to venezuela over a number of years as the result of its oil wealth). in this period, the two tendencies interact. budget deficits reflect the fate of the old capitals—in particular, the problems in the u.s. economy and the pattern of tax cuts for corporations and high income earners that have occurred here. as in the case of the united states, the defeat of the working class and the weakness of working class institutions has meant the successful imposition of capital’s austerity plan which is an attack on the working class. to this can be added the effect of resource exports which have significantly elevated the value of the canadian dollar relative to that of the us and seriously affected manufacturing exports as well as those of sectors such as the forest industry (and thus employment in these sectors). twenty-first century socialism and the global financial meltdown | 177 of course, it is essential to recognise that these two tendencies are not occurring in two separate worlds. the rapid accumulation of capital in china and other emerging capitalist countries has itself been based on the existence of markets in the developed north. to the extent that the latter continue to slump, it can not help but affect the accumulation of capital in the former and thus their demand for resources. when that happens (and i think the only thing in question will be its extent), canada faces the real prospect of a serious decline. all other things equal, this will accelerate and intensify the capitalist austerity project. so, when you ask the question as to what may the next couple of years be like for canadians, it is difficult to provide a definite answer. it depends. all other things are not necessarily equal. if the working class continues to be defeated, we can look forward to one defeat after another—one attack after another on social services, health and safety, education, everything that people have made sacrifices and struggled to achieve in the past. it’s not, of course, inevitable. nothing is inevitable when it comes to the question of class struggle. rw/rr: in the socialist alternative, you argue that “given the heterogeneity of the collective worker (and its various forms of immiseration) and capital’s use of differences to divide the working class in order to defeat it, a political instrument is needed to mediate among the parts of the collective worker, provide the welcoming space where popular movements can learn from each other and develop the unity necessary to defeat capital..” is the anti-capitalist left in canada ready to form such a party? if not, what can be done to foster the development of this type of party? ml: my immediate response is no, the anti-capitalist left in canada is definitely not ready to form a party which can defeat capital. but there is also the question as to whether an anti-capitalist left as such can ever defeat capital. i doubt that. when i was involved in rebuilding the left in vancouver, i argued that we needed to go beyond organising on the basis of anti-capitalism and instead to stress explicitly the necessity for a socialist alternative. anti-capitalism means something different for everyone. for some people, it is opposition to big corporations; for others, it is opposition to the banks or the capitalist state or money or large-scale industry, international capital or inequality in income and wealth. accordingly, the perceived alternative can range from breaking up the corporations to developing alternative currencies to supporting cooperatives and credit unions to putting an end to private ownership 178 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism of the means of production and to returning simply to the good old days when people could anticipate a good job, a home of their own and all the amenities that their parents had. the multiplicity of views about what we don’t like about capitalism (ie., anti-capitalism) was apparent in the occupy movement. of course people should struggle against every assault by capital and every violation of our conceptions of justice. marx made the point well: without the struggles of workers over wages, workers would be a ‘heartbroken, a weak-minded, a worn-out, unresisting mass’ and would be incapable of any larger struggles. of course, too, it is essential to try to link these struggles. however, in the absence of a positive vision, capital can and will separate and defeat those who oppose it. trade unions under attack and facing capital’s demand for concessions, for example, can look at issues outside their immediate concerns and say, ‘what’s this got to do with our members?’ sometimes, though, capital and the capitalist state make it easier to connect issues. in 1983, a simultaneous blanket assault by the social credit government in bc created conditions in which it was possible to unify teachers, hospital workers, renters, poverty movements and private sector trade unions who were injured by the proposed legislation in a movement toward a general strike. similarly, when capital is in a crisis period and moves to administer its affairs through a general programme of capitalist austerity, it is possible to bring together those under attack—both those suffering from the crisis itself and those under attack by the capitalist state. that is what occupy, the enraged and the middle east spring demonstrate. and, right now that potential is there as the result of the harper government’s so-called budget bill. but, as the disintegration of the general strike movement in bc demonstrated, many ‘no’s’ do not make a big ‘yes’. at the present time, people are fighting against reductions in social services, against measures which make universities and education inaccessible for many, against the removal of measures protecting against the destruction of the environment, against the removal of support for our current healthcare system — against, indeed, many characteristics of what is viewed as our entitlement, an entitlement which didn’t drop from the sky but which was the result of years of struggle. in short, people are struggling out of a sense of fairness. but there’s a difference between struggling over questions of fairness (sometimes identified as characteristic of moral economy) and being able to understand why all this is occurring — enough so to be able to put an end to such attacks. if you don’t undertwenty-first century socialism and the global financial meltdown | 179 stand the underlying factors, you are likely to look upon what you’re fighting for as the restoration of the good old days. marx made this point in talking about the limits of wage struggles. 99% of those struggles, he said, were reactions against capital’s previous actions to drive down wages. they were attempts to restore the traditional standard of life and occurred under the conservative banner of a fair day’s pay for a fair day’s work. and, it was accurate to describe this as a conservative slogan because workers fighting under that banner were seeking to conserve or preserve the pre-existing conditions. while though those struggles were essential for developing their collective strength and dignity, marx stressed the necessity for workers to go beyond those guerrilla wars against capital and its state and to struggle under the revolutionary banner of putting an end to capitalist relations. we need to understand the nature of capitalism, and we need a vision of a socialist alternative if we are to defeat capital. this is my point in the socialist alternative: real human development, where i argue for a vision of socialism which involves social ownership of the means of production, worker and community decision-making and production for social needs rather than exchange. a focus upon human development unifies these elements and, indeed, has the potential to unify all our separate struggles. this vision of a society in which all human beings are able to develop their capacities and realize their potential is the vision contained in the communist manifesto—a society in which ‘the free development of each is the condition for the free development of all’. we need to communicate and struggle for the realization of that vision. defeating capital won’t happen spontaneously through some kind of collective epiphany. it requires conscious effort. but any attempt to create at this point a party to defeat capital would be viewed correctly as just another vanguard sect promising to deliver socialism. it is important to start from people’s conception of fairness and to understand why they are moved to struggle. however, we need to recognise the limits of guerrilla wars against capital and to learn to work together in practice to build an understanding about the nature of capitalism and the need for a socialist vision. that means finding ways to create spaces where popular movements can learn from each other—spaces and new forms like people’s assemblies at every level. we need but we’re not ready to form a socialist party that can defeat capital. but we can develop a socialist project, one which listens, educates and helps to create the basis for a new type of party which is integral to and does not stand over and above social movements. 180 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism rw/rr: drawing on your work in venezuela, cuba and the former soviet union what might a socialistic response to the ongoing economic crisis look like? what has been venezuela’s response to the economic crisis? what can socialists in canada and elsewhere learn from these experiences about how to respond to the crises of capitalism? ml: i’ve just completed a new book, contradictions of ‘real socialism’: the conductor and the conducted, which stressed, among other things, the importance of building upon aspects of the ‘moral economy’ of the working class in the former soviet union in order to move forward to socialism. as we know, however, what did happen was precisely the opposite—an attack on the concepts of fairness and justice of workers as part of the process of moving to capitalism. unfortunately, too, there are many signs in cuba that the response to their current crisis is to move in the same direction although it is still too soon to rule out the possibility that there can be a return to the ideas of che guevara about the importance of building socialist human beings. venezuela, though, does offer some ideas that canadians can draw upon—precisely because it is a capitalist country with resource wealth, has the experience of suffering the dutch disease and now has a government with the articulated goal of building a new socialism different from the experiences of the 20th century. in particular, the government of hugo chavez has decided to use its resource wealth to expand enormously access to health services and education, to reclaim as state property the oil and other basic industries as well as telecommunications, electricity, steel, cement, airlines and a host of other sectors seen as important for satisfying the many needs of venezuelans. by building up local industry, housing and agriculture with oil revenues, it is explicitly attempting to demonstrate that there is nothing inevitable about the dutch disease if you have a government committed to food sovereignty and to creating opportunities for jobs that can serve the needs of people. there are many problems in venezuela, and not the least is the inherited culture of clientalism and corruption (as well as a tendency to populism) to which the chavez government is not at all immune. but there are elements that can inspire many people within canada who don’t think of themselves as part of an anti-capitalist or socialist left. the idea of neighbourhood government where people can work together with their neighbours to solve local problems and to plan (something embodied in the communal councils and communes in venezuela) and the idea twenty-first century socialism and the global financial meltdown | 181 of workers councils (without which, chavez has said, you can’t build socialism)—these are ideas which don’t need oil revenues or major state-directed programmes. this concept of protagonistic democracy, a concept of democracy as practice through which people can develop their potential, can appeal to people precisely because of their sense of their powerlessness in modern capitalist society. are there ideas here for canadian socialists to draw upon in the context of the current crisis and the capitalist austerity programme under way? think about it. taking resource wealth away from private corporations to be used for fostering the education and health of the people and building new socially-owned industry, creating new institutions which allow for the development of the capacities of people through their own practices, i.e., developing the ultimate productive forces—wouldn’t these be elements with which to counter capital’s austerity programme and to substitute for it a socialist austerity programme (i.e., austerity for capital)? consider how different would be the situation in the current crisis in canada if resource revenues were poured back into the economy for education and health and for building and modernising economic activity—investments for the future as well as a means of mitigating (instead of exacerbating) the current crisis. capitalism, as chavez has said, is a perverse system—one which doesn’t care about human beings. we can use the opportunity of the current crisis to demonstrate how it is a system that we need to go beyond. 248 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times an interview with michael perelman the invisible handcuffs of capitalism: how market tyranny stifles the economy by stunting workers by michael perelman. new york, new york: monthly review press, 2011. $19.95 u.s., paper. isbn-13: 978-1-58367-229-7. pages: 1-360. carlo fanelli is a ph .d . candidate at the department of sociology & anthropology, carleton university, with interests in critical political economy, labour studies, canadian public policy, social movements, urban sociology and education . carlo serves as editor of alternate routes: a journal of critical social research, and recently co-edited capitalism & confrontation: critical perspectives . michael perelman teaches economics at california state university, chico . he has published 19 books, including, the confiscation of american prosperity, railroading economics, manufacturing discontent, the perverse economy, and the invention of capitalism. michael spoke to carlo fanelli about his most recent book over june 2011 . carlo fanelli (cf): your early work pays a great deal of attention to the classical political economists (e.g. ricardo, smith, j.b. say, j.s. mill, marx, etc.), with later writings engaging with economic luminaries such as alfred marshal and john maynard keynes. could you briefly discuss how this research has influenced your thinking about economics? and in what ways has this motivated your present explorations? michael perelman (mp): the disconnect between what purports to be objective analysis and the underlying power relationships fascinates me. like moliere’s bourgeois gentlemen, who was unaware that he was speaking prose, economists have developed a culture in which they communicate without any recognition of how much they have internalized the distorted perspective of a capitalist system. what is more surprising is how thoroughly the economists were able to propagate their flawed worldview throughout much of society. the economic worldview loses sight of essential elements of the world economists to analyze. once their simplistic world of economics spins out control, economists’ instinct is to explain away their deficiencies rather than finally coming to grips with the real world. in that sense, | 249 an interview with michael perelman the invisible handcuffs of capitalism: i feel that a critical study of economists and their economics becomes useful as a means of self-defense against the tyranny of markets. cf: a central theme running throughout much of your work has been to denaturalize capitalism–that is, as one of your previous book titles indicates, show how capitalism was “invented” and is not, as is commonly assumed, the natural culmination of age-old historical practices. rather your studies show how, as marx put it, capitalism was ‘written in the annals of mankind in letters of blood and fire.’ in this book you critique adam smith’s notion of fair, harmonious and efficient markets, and instead, argue that wage-labour depended on violence and coercion to accept the discipline of the workplace. how does this compare with previous forms of social organization? could you illustrate this with some examples? mp: to be fair, capitalism was not invented in some eureka moment. already in pre-historical times, people traded, but, of course, trade is a necessary, but not sufficient condition for capitalism. early on, people began to take up trades, moving the world closer to a capitalist economy. next, people would face hard times or need money for weddings or funerals. unable to pay their debts, they might find themselves forced into wage labor. however, wage labor at this stage of development represented a relatively small portion of the population. a mixture of wage labor and slavery existed in greece and rome, hence the word proletariat. once the great empires fell, feudal lords acquired far more power. serfdom increased at the expense wage labor. eventually, as modern technology took hold, power shifted again in the direction of traders, often under the shadow of the newly emerging european empires. the landed gentry either lost power or joined in the commercial revolution, which morphed into the industrial revolution. at this point, forcing people to work to make commodities for foreign trade became a high priority. marx described this process as primitive accumulation, where he wrote about the blood and fire. i followed up his work in my book, the invention of capitalism, where i described some of the harsh measures used to drive people off the land, where they could provide for their own needs, leaving them with the necessity of having to work for wages. the laws against hunting were particularly interesting. the legend of robin hood represented the feudal measures to protect the aristocrats’ hunting preserves. by the early 17th century, these laws had fallen into disuse. at the end of the century, as the shoots of modern capitalism were being 250 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times laid down, the law was suddenly enforced again. hunting became a capital offense. during the next century, australia became populated with by leaders of these game laws. at the same time, clumps of aristocratic hunters were allowed to ride across farmers’ land, in order to chase down foxes. in their published books, the political economists at the time ignored the injustices associated with the enforcement of the feudal game laws, as well as the enormous economic damage done by the hunters. instead, they described the economy as the result of voluntary transactions between willing buyers and sellers. away from the public eye, these same economists applauded the displacement of rural masses, which was providing new bodies for the emerging proletariat. in this sense, capitalism was invented as i described in the invention of capitalism. capitalism was invented in another sense. the early economists described the emergence of capitalism as a voluntary system that benefited everybody. this falsification of history, which was central to their analysis, was a very creative invention. cf: your most recent book, as you state (p.9), takes aim at capitalism in terms of its own basic rationale: the creation of an efficient method of organizing production. you argue that the failure by economists and employers alike to adequately take work, workers and working conditions into account has led to actions that have stifled the economy. this inattention, however, has not been accidental. can you describe the consequences of this largely ignored dimension of market inefficiency? mp: good question. in the invisible handcuffs, i tried to show how economists tried to frame capitalism as a system of voluntary transactions, as i mentioned in my previous answer. one can understand how the economists could have gotten away with this evasion of reality in a world when literacy was limited and communications, expensive. in a modern world, to be able to get away with such nonsense is an audacious act of genius. economic theory also abstracts from virtually anything having to do with time. for example, business is assumed to invest efficiently when it purchases durable equipment. how is that possible when business has no knowledge about future demand conditions, technology, or competition? considerations of such matters would make mathematical models impossible. how is it possible to efficiently value the existing stock of resource, such as petroleum, when nobody knows precisely how much petroleum | 251 there is, or whether alternative sources of energy will appear, or whether creating even more carbon dioxide would be too dangerous to contemplate? what economics does do very well is to create an effective ideological system that pretends to prove that whatever business wants to do is good. within this framework of voluntary transactions, workers agree to a wage bargain in which they give up their leisure time in return for wages, which more than compensate for their lost leisure. no thought is given to the context in which the transaction is made. from this perspective, the conditions of workers who accept the lethal consequences of accepting a job at the fukushima nuclear plant are no different a high priced athlete playing an enjoyable game. also missing from this picture is anything having to do with work, workers, and working conditions. the only relevant action is the wage bargain. just as an individual consumer tries to buy commodities at the cheapest possible price, employers want to buy their workers for as little as they can. unions become framed as a monopoly that interferes with the transactions. at the same time, this transaction-based perspective, neither employers nor society have any reason to nurture the skills or the creativity of the working class. why not break the unions and defund education. not surprisingly, productivity suffers. traumatized workers, as alan greenspan called them, may often be docile, but their fear of job loss is likely to interfere with efficient performance. but since all that counts is buying work at the cheapest possible price, even though the ultimate effect of that arrangement is detrimental to productivity, as well as society at large. in the book, i do describe the hostile treatment meted out to economists who stray from this perspective. in part, this attitude reflects the defensive behavior of academics who want to defend the purity of their supposed science, but, i suspect, that there may also be an intuition that to move beyond the transaction perspective ultimately leads to marx. part of what is involved is the unproductive effort used to maintain of power relations. once a worker is reduced to a means of production and managers can believe that they are selected because of their superior abilities. this perspective is obviously detrimental to workers’ creativity. in one of my favorite cases, when computerization was first being introduced into manufacturing, a paper mill opened up its computer system to the whole workforce. the workers who manned the facan interview with michael perelman the invisible handcuffs of capitalism: 252 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times tory took advantage of this access to information and quickly ramped up productivity and efficiency. recognizing the growing threat to their authority, management quickly shut off their access. imagine a team sport–basketball or soccer–in which no one could do anything without prior authorization from their coach. any deviations would be punished. not only would the players’ restriction hurt their play, but the players’ development would also suffer. cf: you make the case in the invention of capitalism (p. 10) that economics is an ideology masquerading as a science buttressed by mathematical models. scientific pretentions aside, the economics profession in your view supports the interests of the rich and powerful at the expense of the vast majority of the working class. contra mainstream economics, you show how the interests of employers and employees are fundamentally at odds. instead, you contend that what might be called “invisible handcuffs” blind workers from realizing how capitalism both constrains their potential and degrades their quality of life. can you briefly describe what you mean by this? in what ways has the economics profession, particularly their role in academe, played in reinforcing capitalism? how do neoclassical presuppositions, such as natural assumptions concerning human behavior, differ from your own starting points? mp: let me take issue with your premise. you suggest that economics supports the (perceived) interest of the rich. i inserted the parenthesis to suggest that economists are not doing the rich a real favor. i am convinced that a more egalitarian society would improve the general quality of life, not just of the working class. by all measures, the quality of life increases with equality. ignoring that point, in the united states the economics profession, fearing to suggest anything that will upset the rich and powerful, has practiced severe self-censorship for more than a century. other countries are not as extreme in this respect, but diversity is relatively rare in the study of economics around the world. a leftist– let alone a marxist–can hope to get a job in literary criticism or even sociology, but the chances in an economics department is less than slim. there are a few liberal arts college, some jesuit institutions, and a handful of state universities that are less rigid, but nonetheless relatively few of them. there was a brief opening in the 60s, but that has long passed. besides, the rigor (mortis?) of economists’ training is extremely demanding in terms of mastering mathematics and statistics. even if a student is already advanced enough | 253 to breeze through that work, he or she will have to find a sympathetic professor to oversee anything outside of the mainstream. if that effort is successful, the vast majority of departments would not consider that person as a potential colleague. i am fascinated by human potential—what unlikely people are able to accomplish despite the odds. i believe that everybody has the capacity to be the worlds best at something; that the role of society (not just family, or education) should be to help people discover what that something is. to the extent that this kind of discovery becomes widespread, societies will prosper. hierarchical systems prevent that kind of discovery and need to be eliminated as soon as possible. cf: you argue (p.29) that the promise of job creation drives the rhetoric of almost all economic policies. how has this influenced policymakers and what have been the consequences? what role have large corporations played? and how have changes in the organization of work, workers and working conditions affected the quality of employment? mp: the rhetoric of job creation smacks of blackmail. give us everything you want or we will make unemployment worse. but if you look at the last decade, business got virtually everything it requested, but without much job creation. what is worse, the largest corporations were most effective in reducing jobs. besides, real hourly wages peaked back in 1973. the corporations run around from state to state, offering to create new jobs in return for tax breaks and other incentives. sometimes the jobs never materialize; other times they do, but disappear soon after. cf: with the focus on workplace (especially union) concessions and attacks against the public provision of social services a current flashpoint of political contestation, how does economics serve to obscure relations of class and the compulsions of the market? mp: abstract economics does not play much of a role, either in the discussion of job creation or in the concessions and cutbacks that are rolling across the country. the basic justification is that business, by its very nature, will create all of the preconditions for prosperity as long as nothing impedes “the magic of the marketplace.” adults should not believe in magic. as long as opportunities exist to cut back on wages and benefits by moving work abroad to where people work for pennies an hour, expectation of a tsunami of good, highpaying jobs is ridiculous–even more so when companies get tax breaks to take advantage of such labor arbitrage. an interview with michael perelman the invisible handcuffs of capitalism: 254 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times cf: finally, where do we go from here? how may economists and the economic profession, within and external to academe, be challenged in progressive ways? what role does political education and mobilization play? how might academics, activists and trade unionists begin to break the chains of the “invisible handcuffs” ? mp: now you are getting to the toughest question. even marx never described the specifics of his ideal society. although he frequently recommended tactics to address particular situations, he never laid out a long-term strategy. in a sense, he had no choice. he was trying to assemble disparate political factions who could never agree on anything. some of his german followers then adopted the attitude that they should just wait for the crisis to open the door to a new society. now, after more than a century, that quietist strategy should be thoroughly discredited. the first step is the easiest. develop the thoroughgoing critique of the status quo. unfortunately, radicals have been quicker to snipe at each other’s analysis than to collaborate on something to appeal to the larger population. in short, the easiest part is still difficult. next, we must be able to communicate an alternative. merely to suggest the abstract idea of socialism is vulnerable to the charge of proposing to duplicate all the abuses, real or imagined, of any society that purports to be socialist. now, in the midst of a sadistic round of austerity, proposing an alternative should be easier than ever, but i haven’t seen much progress in that regard. the next step becomes even more difficult. people need to be able to organize in a way that not only appeals to the masses, but it makes them feel empowered. although i have not offered any concrete program, i think it might be useful in considering any action to think about how it might contribute to, or detract from the simple steps that i suggested. sr embourgeoisement or proletarianization? stan marshall society as a whole is more and more splitting up into two great hostile camps, into two great classes directly facing each other; bourgeoisie and proletariat. * marx and engles' proposition that the system of capitalist relations would inevitably result in a polarization of the two main classes the bourgeoisie and the proletariat is and has been under considerable debate. the rise of a new middle class which appears to be located between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat has sparked speculation that the expected polarization of the class structure would not occur. the debate, of course, centres around whether there are any processes in operation which will have such a polarization as its end result. two theoretical propositions have been advanced. the first, the proletarianization thesis, asserts that the old and new middle classes are being drawn into the proletariat or working class. the second, the embourgeoisement thesis, argues that the upper levels of the working class are being assimilntcd ir.to an ever increasing ndo'dle class. this paper will endeavour to examine critically these two hypotheses in order to determine the merits of each in studying the class structure of capitalist societies. in order to accomplish this task it is necessary to allow for the examination of society at the level of production relations as well as at the level of distributive relations. more specifically, the aims of this paper will be (1) to identify the 59 processes of embourgeoisement and proletarianization in terms of their operation in capitalist society, (2) to determine the coniposition and location of the "new middle class", and (3) to formulate a basis from which to look at the middle classes of modern capitalist society in order to determine if there has been or will be a significant change in the class structure. before this can be accomplished, it is necessary to look at both proletarianization and embourgeoisement in order to determine the emphasis of each thesis. at first glance, it appears that these propositions are polar opposites. however, it is not the case when one looks at the arguments at different levels of analysis. as will be 2 3 seen later on, g. carchedi and harry braverman both attempt to look at the proletarianization of the middle classes from the level of the economic substructure and changes in the relations to the means of production. on the other hand, the embourgeoisement thesis is primarily concerned with changes in the superstructural elements resulting from a change in consumption patterns and life styles within the working . 4 class. embourgeoisement has as its major focus the perceived increasing affluence of the western working class." these changed material conditions and increased opportunities for workers are seen as resulting in a general homogeneity of lifestyles and values. in other words, the traditional working class is seen as developing middle class lifestyles. the argument rests on the increase in the affluence of workers and the perception that material conditions are better for western workers today 60 than they have ever been at any other time. these improved conditions are seen as being paramount in stifling any development of a working class consciousness. thus the cmbourgeoisement process is seen as operating upon the traditional working class in a manner which has changing material conditions resulting in changing values and lifestyles. proletarianization has as its major focus the economic or objectiveconditions which perpetuate the traditional working class and adds to its number by forcing segments of the middle class to become working class. these segments are proletarianized only in an economic sense i.e., their economic identification is with the working class. this does not mean that at any given point in time, their values or behaviour will be the same as production workers. g. carchedi is one author who recognizes that a proper class analysis must take into account all the analytical components. there is no autoratic correspondence between the economic identification of classes and their definitions. this is so because classes must be defined in economic, political and ideological terms. ^ the proletarianization process is seen as operating upon the middle classes in a manner in which the economic (objective) identification of the middle class is changed. once the economic condition is changed we can expect a corresponding change in the superstructural elements. it is recognized that changes in the political and ideological spheres are not necessarily immediate. however, at its limit, the proletarianization process will result in the middle classes "becoring proletariat". 6: it is clear that proletarianization is not necessarily opposed to the embourgeoisement thesis. its basis does not rest entirely upon the assumption that workers are becoming less affluent. proletarianization refers to a structural transformation in the relation of the worker to the means of production. the embourgeoisement thesis, on the other hand, rests upon the assertion that workers are becoming more affluent and is concerned mainly with distributive relations. one area where the two theses tend to make opposite projections is in the development of a working class consciousness. proletarianization supporters claim that changing economic conditions set the stage for a rising working class consciousness while embourgeoisement supporters claim that the material affluence of workers militates against the development of a working class consciousness. these are questions worthy of examination but due to the limited scope of this paper, they can be touched upon only superficially here. it is now necessary to examine each of these processes individually. embourgeoisement the thesis of working class embourgeoisement in its simple formulation is no longer in fashion. but its political corollary has come in again by the back door, with these newer and more sophisticated interpretations of the situation of the "affluent worker". 8 the studies concerning the "affluent worker" that are the most well known are those of john goldthorpe, david lockwood, f. bechhofer 9 and j. piatt at luton in britain. these authors set out to determine if workers are becoming "bourgeois". the locale which they chose, they believed to be one in which the conditions would lead to the 62 embourgeoisement of the workers. for goldthorpe ctal . , the test to prove embourgeoisement would be to prove that the acquisition of incomes and living standards by manual workers similar to white collar workers would lead to the adoption of a new social outlook and new social norms that are middle class. the acquisition of this new outlook and these new norms would then have to lead to an acceptance of the manual worker by the middle class on the basis of equality. in this way it was to be a stiff test of the embourgeoisement thesis. goldthorpe et al . concluded that the affluent worker is not becoming bourgeois but is becoming a new type of worker whose work is no longer central to his life and whose orientation is "instrumental". this "instrumental" worker is concerned primarily with making money which he can spend on his family. in other words, his "outside of work" activities become his central life interest. goldthorpe et al . , call such a worker the privatized worker and as such he is not middle class. however, this privatization militates against collective organization by the worker and in this way hinders the development of a class consciousness. privatization does not preclude militancy or radical action but it does decrease the probability that radical action ... 11 will occur. j.h. westergaard criticizes these studies from both a theoretical and methodological viewpoint. his main criticism is that the authors of these studies do not recognize that the workers' monetary orientation to the job is remarkably similar to marx's "cash nexus". marx rccog12 nized this "cash nexus" as the binding force in capitalist society. 63 the interpretation of these studies ...underplays evidence [strikes, industrial sabotage, work stoppages] to indicate the precariousness of the balance between attitudes of cooperation and "societal resignation" on the one hand, and on the other hand those conflicting attitudes involving a generalized social discontent which may be released once the single .stranded "cash orientation" becomes strained or broken. 1* in other words, at any one point in time, the workers may be cooperative and resigned to the workings of the existing society but the cooperation and resignation does not preclude the possibility of action resulting from the"continuing conflict once the cash nexus is broken. although goldthjrpe etal . , make a case for the inaction of the working class, their case is not strong enough to say that workers are becoming bourgeois. in addition, their argument is not strong enough to say that becoming affluent or privatized, eliminates the possibility of some radical action in the future. for while the affluent workers' ' "instrumental" orientation to work militates against any radicalization stemming from his employment situation, new and more radical demands may well be engendered by the clash between steadily rising aspirations and the barriers to their achievement in the world outside work. 14 in addition to the possibility of action resulting from the strain on the cash nexus, there is also a possibility of action resulting from the inability of the system to maintain and increase the workers desire for individual upward mobility. if these aspirations are stifled then m the potential for radical action may be stimulated. up to this point, the possibility of such events taking place are mostly speculative based upon a few isolated labor disputes which have resulted from similar conditions. however, sucli a possibility cannot be dismissed offhand. an integral part of the affluence thesis is that blue collar or manual workers' incomes are converging with those of white collar workers. this convergence results in increased consumption by the working class from which results a corresponding identification with the middle class. richard hamilton points out that people tend to assune that there was a wide gap between manual and non-manual incomes in the past and that the tendency today is for incomes to converge and overlap. hamilton disputes this convergence. he maintains that those workers viewed as well-off are in those families in which there is more than one wage earner and that the pattern of work for families of nonmanuals is different from that of families formed by manual workers. affluent working class families are not like equivalent middle-class families. the majority of well off working-class families achieve "affluence" through a greater expenditure of effort. 1° there are several other differences between so called affluent working class families and rriddle class families. for example, in middle class families, wives and children are more free from work. in this sense, the determinants of income for middle class are linked to the head of the family's job and career; while working class "affluence" is dependent upon the wife's job and career. in other words, the wife's 65 income auguments the husband's and accounts for the "extras" that the family may buy. one can see that the expenditure of effort in the working class family is significantly different from that of the middle class family. the acceptance of the idea that incomes are converging i.e., that manual wages are increasing, provides the basis for a theory of general satisfaction in society. however, there are some misconceptions about 18 increasing incomes. hamilton notes three in particular: (1) the frame of reference is usually past experience, therefore people perceive that their wages are increasing. they are perceiving an absolute increase as opposed to a relative increase. (2) incomes estimates are often based on hourly rates of pay and people assume full employment at that specific rate. however, they do not consider that many jobs which have high hourly pay rates are not jobs which guarantee year round employment. in many fields, construction for example, year round employment is a rarity. (3) the third misconception is related to the first in that there is a perceptual distortion due to continuing inflation. for example, the minimum wage keeps increasing. people remember when the minimum wage was much lower and draw a conclusion that incomes are increasing. this is obviously true in absolute terms but is questionable when viewed in relative terms. due to the increasing incomes (in absolute terms), living standards are also assumed to be increasing for the working class and converging with the middle class. hamilton measured living standards 66 in terms of home ownership and automobile ownership, tie found that the ip lower middle class " and the working class shared a similar life condition, that is, a lower percentage own homes in comparison to the upper middle class and the homes that they do own are less expensive. similarly, the upper middle class are significantly differentiated from the lower middle and working classes in automobile ownership. the ability to buy new cars varies directly with social class. hamilton concludes that convergence in income and consumption theses are not well founded. it might appear from hamilton's work that there is some convergence between the lower middle class and the working class. associated with this is a problem of definition and identification of 20 the middle class. related to ha-i.ilton 1 s work and corroborating it to some extc.t is 21 the work of andrew l.evison. he purposely sets out to dispel some of the myths associated with the embourgeoisement thesis. he attacks the 22 assumption that the majority of americans are white collar workers by pointing out inaccuracies in the census categories researchers use to determine the number of people who make up the white collar or blue collar ranks. he notes especially two instances (1) the lumping of large numbers of clerical and sales occupations into white collar categories and (2) the contention that service categories are something other than blue collar. by rectifying these two situations, he estimates that 60°. of america is in the working class. a second myth which lcvison attacks is the myth that blue collar workers earn as much as white collar workers. his procedure for 67 determining this is directly related to the work of richard hamilton. he corrects tor inaccuracies in categories used to show the distribution of income. his conslusion is that the working class earns less. related to the distribution of income is the condition of lifestyle. the myth maintains that blue collar lifestyle is similar to white collar lifestyle. levison dispels this by noting differences in the lifestyles of working class and middle class families especially in the location of working class areas vis a vis middle class areas. he makes a valid criticism of this myth by saying that the working class and the middle class very seldom come into contact with each other. in other words, the working class are not being assimilated into the middle class. he elaborates by looking at community life. blue collar life is permeated 23 by economic insecurit) and a lower quality of life. in other words, the blue collar worker is not "affluent" in that he does not have job security. in addition the "affluence" of the blue collar worker often refers to the ability to buy a house. it is questionable whether being able to meet such an essential need as shelter constitutes "affluence". there is also a problem of comparability in that working class communities tend to have less expensive homes and their neighborhoods are seldom given the priority that middle class communities are given with regard to services or development. even the educational system which was to have opened up opportunities for the working class has failed to do so. there have been many studies documenting middle class bias in the school system, discrimin24 ating against working class children. at the same time higher ' education has become more universal, the educational requirements for jebs (even manual jobs) have shifted upwards. coincident with this, there are not enough jobs available for those who have a university education. in other words, an increase in education has not resulted .-. ar. increase in opportunity within the upper and middle levels of the occupational structure. obviously, this paper has not taken the position that the workers arc becoming bourgeois. it supports the position that the working class has not decreased and has not become more affluent relative to other segments of society. it is optimistic that the working class is becoming more aware of their objective class condition and that the potential for radical action is reflected in high absenteeism, shoddy vcrkr.ar.ship, sabotage, use of drugs, periodic refusals to accept the authority of the foreman, strikes, increasing incidences of rejecting settlements, wild cat strikes, and challenges to incumbent union leaders. in this sense, the working class is alive and retaining its revolutionary potential. up to this point, the discussion has revolved around the embourgec:?ercr.t or "affluent worker" thesis. as mentioned at the beginning of this paper, the central focus of the embourgeoiscment thesis lies in the distributive relations in society. this fact is obvious in light of the works discussed here. although they formulate an effective refutation of the embourgeoiscment thesis, the works of hamilton and levison tend to be descriptive rather than explanatory. they tend to focus upon a descriptive account of the distribution of surplus in b9 society rather than those factors which underly changes in the class structure. moreover, to refute embourgeoisement is not to illustrate proletarianization for the two, as i have argued, are not cecrpletely antithetical. with this in mind, it is now necessary to turn to the proletarianization thesis. proletarianization one of the main obstacles to a study of proletarianization has been an inadequate understanding of the class position of those v«hc appear to be in contradictory class positions. this lack of understanding of the class position of the middle classes has led to the criticism that the process of proletarianization is inadequately or improperly defined. in other words, if the criteria for placing individuals in the middle class are not clear, then it is impossible to understand how any process could lead to a deterioration of that class position. however, the work of g. carchedi has gone a long way to identifying the class location of those who seem to be neither wholly in the bourgeoisie nor wholly in the proletariat. harry braverman also acknowledges that this is a problem and both he and carchedi come to a similar type of conclusion. the most important problem in locating the "middle class" is not that they are a class unto themselves but that they take on characteristics from both the bourgeoisie and the proletariat. braverman comes to the conclusion this way. the complexities of the class structure of pre-monopoly capitalism arose from the fact that so large a proportion of -o the working population, being neither ecployed by capital not itself employing labour to any significant extent, fell outside the capital-labor polarity. the complexity of the class structure of modern monopoly capitalism arises from the very opposite consideration: namely that almost all of the population has been transformed into employees cf capital . ^5 this quotation suggests that it is necessary to make a distinction between the "old" riddle class and the "new" middle class. the old middle classes are the petite bourgeoisie the small businessman and the independent commodity producers. the new middle classes are the managers and supervisors. for braverman the old middle class is neither bourgeoisie nor proletariat because they lie outside the dominant relations of production i.e., capital-labor-polarity. on the other har.d, the new middle clas: is situated between capital and labor. their class location becomes difficult to define because they are both manager and worker. ...there is a range of intermediate categories, sharing the characteristics of worker on the one side and manager on the other in varying degrees.-^ implicit in this statement is a recognition that managers and workers carry on different functions and that there is a group of people who are both manager and worker. as such, they must carry out the functions of both these positions. carchcdi makes it very clear that there is a definite distinction between the old and the new middle class. his conclusion is similar to braverman's in that the new middle class seems to be both bourgeoisie and proletariat. however he introduces specifically that component which we extrapolated implicitly from 71 braverman the idea that functions are important in determining class 27 position. carchedi's main contribution to the controversy surrounding the middle class and whether this sector of the labor force is being proletarianized, is the introduction of the two functions the function of global capital and the function of the collective worker . it is necessary to try to understand exactly what carchedi means when he speaks of these two functions and how they enable us to understand the economic identification of the middle class. it is unnecessary to go through the rather lengthy and complex derivations of these definitions as given by carchedi. instead the definitions will be borrowed as he finalizes them. . . . to perform the function of the collective worker means to take part in the capitalist production process as a whole ... from the point of view of the labour process and thus of the surplus labour producing process . conversely, to perform the global function of capital means to take part in the capitalist production process as a whole exclusively from the point of view of the surplus labour producing process . ^ put more simply "there will be those who will collectively perform 29 the labour process and those who will supervise". returning to the distinction between old and new middle class, carchedi makes his distinction very clear. the old middle class (1) owns (legally and economically) the means of production, (2) performs the function of capital and the function of the collective worker, (3) is laborer and non-laborer and (4) is exploiter and exploited. -: however, carchedi maintains that at the level of production relations, the role of ownership is dominant over the functions performed and thus the old middle class belongs to the capitalist class. however, in the monopoly stage of capitalism, the function of capital becomes the global function of capital which can be performed by agents outside the capitalist class. these agents are the new middle class and are characterized by (1) not owning (legally or economically) the means of production, (2) performing the global function of capital and the function of the collective worker, (3) being laborer and non-laborer and (4) being exploiter and exploited. _ thus the differences between the new middle class and the old middle class according to carchedi are substantial. the old middle class perform the function of capital individually while the new rr.iddle class perform, the function in conjunction with the capitalist and with other members of the new middle class. in the old iriddlc class the function of capital is always dominant but in the new middle class either the global function of capital or the function of the collective worker could be dominant at any given time. these are the key points to understanding the new middle class. ...that the new rr.iddle class performs the global function of capital even without owning the means of production, and that it performs this function in conjunction with the function of the collective worker, is the basic point for an understanding of the nature of this class. 32 carchedi claims that the new middle class can perform the two functions (not simultaneously) in varying degrees. the range is from performing exclusively the function of global capital to performing any combination 73 of the two functions. any definition of proletarianization formulated at this point must be composed of two elements (1) a change in function performed and (2) a devaluation of labor power. from a completely economic standpoint, proletarianization for carchedi becomes ... . the limit of the process of devaluation of the new niddle class ' labour-power, i.e., the reduction of this labour-power to an average un skilled lev'fl coupled with the elimination of the global function of capital . -^ the phenomena which are associated with proletarianization (lower level of living, unemployment, lowering of lifes' conditions degradation of the work process etc.) are manifestations of the devaluation of labor power in conjunction with the stripping away from the new 34 middle class of the global function of capital. carchedi makes one final remark which is central to understanding the process of proletarianization. it is a remark which relates to the beginning of this paper where it is noted that proletarianization has a different focus than embourgeoisement . it was not«d that the analysis may focus on the economic, the political or the ideological. proletarianization is generally focused on the economic while the embourgeoisement thesis is generally focused on the political and the ideological. carchedi makes it clear that the processes operating in this limited sense will not be sufficient to change the definition of a class. ...we should be careful not to confuse proletarianization with "becoming proletariat". the former term only refers to the economic sphere which, as we know, is not enough to classify groups and strata within one or another class. khen the "4 process of proletarianization has been completed we have only the objective conditions for a certain stratum to become part of the proletariat. there are, however, also political and ideological conditions which must be met before that stratum or group will actually become part of the proletariat . 35 kith this in mind, we can see that any definition of proletarianization taken from carchedi will be limited exclusively to the economic sphere and will give us only one dimension to examine in trying to ascertain any changes in the class structure. this is not a criticism of the excellent work carchedi has done, but is a plea for a more comprehensive definition of proletarianisation at both the political and ideological levels as well as at the economic level. as mentioned pr»viously, carchedi has opened up a new avenue in the research of proletarianization by introducing the two functions. previous research, especially that done by leo johnson and harry braverran has provided some empirical substantiation of the devaluation of labor power in canada as a condition of becoming proletarianized. however, further research is needed in the area to determine if there are changes in the functions performed by the middle class in canada i.e., changes in the balance of functions performed as described by carchedi. the devaluation of labor power is adequately documented in many places in harry draverman's book labor and monopoly capital . he highlights the processes of change in the economic sphere which had a resultant change in the objective identification of workers. the introduction of samuel taylor's techniques allowed the capitalist to extract far greater surplus value from the worker than ever before. 75 the advancement of technology allowed the capitalist to usurp control of the work process from the worker. it separated the worker from the conception and planning portion of the labor process. increasing division of labor in the workshop further removed the worker from engaging in the entire production process. thus the worker was further degraded. braverman indicates that the same processes were occurring in the offices of the capitalist enterprise. the clerical workers were undergoing a process of change as well. the meaning of "clerk" has changed in the transformation from early capitalism to monopoly capitalism. in carchedi's terms, office workers have had the global function of capital removed from them. many office jobs are no longer associated with management but with manual labor and have been mechanized in order to increase efficiency. the clerical portion of the new middle class is becoming increasingly proletarianized. ...the process in the course of which the body of salaried employees becomes a mass group rests on the successful attempt to replace the personal experience of the individual by a rational scientific business administration, so that an increasing proportion of the workers can be changed without danger to the efficiency of the enterprise... the salaried employees as a whole are being subjected to a process of decreasing social esteem. 37 an excellent example of this process is documented by joan greenbaum in monthly review , "division of labor in the computer field". in this article she documents the rise and fall of computer related occupations. 76 in a short twenty-year span, work in the computer field has been transformed by capitalism to suit its needs, through carefully planned division of labor. °° greenbaun; describes this rise and fall as the degradation of a technical work force into a "white collar assembly line where control of knowledge 39 in concentrated" in addition to the down grading of skills, the situation outlined by joan greenbaum also highlights another consequence of the process of the increasing division of labor. this consequence is the formation of a surplus labor force as there is an increasing centralization of computer companies. the centralization compounded the other consequences by continuing the lowering of wages and by further reducing task definitions. the end result seems to be ...lower salaries relative to the cost of living, expansion of clerical like jobs, and a shift away from computer specialists. technological skill has been removed from all but a handful of workers. 40 it seems obvious from the foregoing discussion that the devaluation of labor power is integral to any definition of proletarianization and so we must accept it as part of the definition used here. it is necessary to make a distinction between proletarianization as it affects the "old middle class" as opposed to how it affects the "new middle class". because of the differences between the two segments of the ciddlc class, proletarianization is going to have a different consequence for each. according to the definition of proletarianization at the econoric level, there must be a devaluation of labor power plus a change in the function performed i.e., a shift from the global function of capital towards the function of the collective worker. however, the proletarianization of the old middle class would have to entail an elimination of the function of capital and thus an elimination of that occupational grouping. this is necessarily so because in the old middle class the function of capital is always dominant as they own the means of production. the shift away from employment classified as petite bourgeoise in this century would be an indication that this proletarianization is taking place. the decreasing proportion of the income allocated to the petite bourgeoisie is another indication and is a factor involved in the elimination of those ei7iplo>nient sectors. leo johnson documents the decline of the petite bourgeoisie in canada. this decide is illustrated in a drop in their relative numbers from 14.7* of income earners in 1£ms to 10.9% in 196s. in addition the petite bourgeoisie have become relatively more impoverished in terms cf income during that period. the petite bourgeoisie income as a percentage of the average income decreased from 120% in 1948 to 94* in 41 1968. this decline occurred for both the small independent commodity producer, especially the small farmer, and the small independent businessman, although for each of these subgroups the decline was at different rates. we have already documented the tendency of capitalism to erode the new middle class and now we see an even more startling erosion of the old middle class. thus far the paper has dealt with the emphasis of both the cmbourgeoisement and proletarianization theses. in doing so it has highlighted 7fi and refuted the embourgeoiserr.cnt thesis as being an inaccurate and incocplete assessment of the changing class structure. this paper has accepted the proletarianization thesis as being infinitely more amenable tc erpirical research which would allow for a complete and indepth analysis of the class structure. the cmbourgeoisement thesis is deficient in that it concentrates on the distributive relations and the superstructural elements in society. this deficiency is a fundamental one in that it neglects changes in the production relations and it is these changes which are determinant and dominant over changes in 42 the superstructure. conversely, the proletarianization argument uses this as its very starting point. if any criticism can be made of this approach, it is that it rarely progresses past this starting point i.e., it is concerned alirost entirely with the economic level of analysis. khat needs to be developed is a more comprehensive definition and cxaminaticn of proletarianization which would account for the political and ideological levels as well. basically the conclusion which must be reached at this time is that it is an erpirical question as to whether the formation of the ''new niddle class" is a class with middle class characteristics or a class with traditional working class characteristics. either way, the most appropriate way to analyze it is to prove or disprove the increasing deterioration cf the old and new niddle classes in conjunction with the contir.ui:.^ proletarian condition of the traditional working class. khat follows is a \ery brief outline of how this may be accomplished. as mentioned earlier the new and old middle classes have to be 79 treated somewhat differently. a deterioration in the old middle class will be detected by an absolute decrease in the percentage of the population making a living in the petite bourgeois occupations. however, this in itself is not sufficient in that a corresponding increase must be found in occupations which are traditionally working class or are devalued new middle class occupations. in this way there must be a change over time in the occupational groupings. there are several indicators which can be used to detect these changes. the devaluation of occupations can be tested by analyzing the income (including benefits) changes over time. a devaluation in labor power will lead to corresponding devaluation in income of that group relative to the incomes of other occupational groupings. this analysis could be used to check the embourgeoi semen t thesis as well by checking the incomes of traditional working class occupations relative to other occupations. another aspect which has to be examined in the changing class locations of occupations is the innovation of technology. it is necessary to look at how diversified jobs have become as a result of the implementation of technology. the result could have either of two consequences (1) routinization i.e. a more complex job is broken down into two or more additional, more routine, less skillful jobs or (2) technological rationalization i.e. several jobs are brought together into one job which does not demand as much skill as the original jobs. either way, it is an indication that the labor power of those performing the jobs has been devaluated. the most obvious consequence should be a reduction in the relative income of those occupations. 80 not unrelated to the above is the degree of unemployment in occupational sectors. rationalization of jobs due to technological change can result in large numbers of unemployed. before an occupation is devalued there should be a high demand for workers in that area. as devaluation takes place the supply of workers capable of filling devalued positions should outstrip the demand. therefore, an indication of devaluation should be a large number of unemployed who are qualified to work in that occupational sector. other variables which have to be considered include trade union activity, male-female occupations, and education and experience. the trade unions could have the effect of obscuring some of the obvious differences in income differentials. at the same time, increased trade union activity in o:cupational sectors where there has been little activity previously may be an indication that the workers are becoming aware cf the deterioration of their position. it matters not whether the activity is a result of their becoming proletarian or a reaction against their becoming proletarian. the same obvious indicator, increased trade union activity, is still there. the sexual differentiation among occupations is important in looking at proletarianization. one must determine whether occupations with a high proportion of female manpower are more prone to deterioration than those with mainly male manpower or whether women are drawn into jobs where the deterioration process has already begun. the amount of experience and education required for performing jobs must be analyzed to determine if there is a deterioration of these qualifications in certain sectors relative to other sectors. bl the brief discussion given above states some of the factors which may be examined in a study of the devaluation of labor power. however, if one follows carchedi's definition, then the functions which the agents perform must be analyzed as well. in this case the operationalization is somewhat more difficult. the function of global capital may be related to the work of supervision and control. the function of the 43 collective worker occurs when the agent takes part in the labor process. if over any two time periods the function of the job shifts from that of global capital to that of the collective worker then the occupation is becoming more proletarian. in order to research this type of change it is necessary to look at such variables as (1) supervisory duties of the job and (2) the amount of control over other employees the job requires. obviously the investigation of the changes occurring in the middle classes is an exceedingly difficult and imposing task. this task has been touched upon only very superficially in this paper but it is a topic worthy of much more intensive scrutiny. 82 notes 1. marx, karl and frederick engels. the communist manifesto , new york: international publishers, 1st published 1s48. p. 9. 2. carchedi, g. "on the economic identification of the new middle class" in economy and society , 1975. 3. braverman, harry. labor and monopoly capital , monthly review press 1974. 4. these superstructural elements are the political and the ideological. 5. the embourgeoisement thesis was most popular in the 1950s and 1960s. some of its major proponents were kurt b. mayer, class and society , new york: random house, 1955; ferdinand zweig, the worker in an affluent society , london: heinrmann, 1961; and gerhard lenski, power and privilege , new york: mcgraw-hill, 1966. 6. g. carchedi op. cit . p. 59. 7. the difference between "proletarianization" and "becoming proletariat' will be expounded upon later in this paper. 8. kestergaard, j.h. "the rediscovery of the cash nexus" in socialist register , 1970, p. 113. 9. this study is published in three volumes. (1) the affluent worker : industrial attitudes and behavior , cambridge university press, 19t8, (2) the affluent worker: political attitudes and behavior , 1966 and (3) the affluent worker in the class structure , 1969. 10. goldthorpe, j.h. et.al . the affluent worker in the class structure , 1969, p. 24. also see j.h. westergaard. op. cit . p,113~ 11. studies conducted by k.g. runciinan, relative deprivaticn and social justice , 1966 and r.t. mckenzie and a. silver, angels in marble : working class conservatives in england , 1968 lend support to the conclusions of goldthorpe et.al . pertaining to the development of the working class. workers are described as "secular and pragmatic" "instrumental ly oriented" and "privatised". 12. j.h. westergaard. op.cit . p. 120. 13. ibid , p. 121. 14. ibid , p. 132. 83 15. hamilton, richard. class and politics in the united states , new york: wiley, 1972, p. 378. 16. ibid , p. 369. 17. ibid , p. 371. 18. ibid , pp. 380-381. 19. by using this type of designation for classes, hamilton differs soirewhat from the conception of classes used in this paper. a more fully developed definition of class will be attempted later in a discussion of the middle class which is integral to the proletarianization thesis. however, for the purposes of illustrating the problems of the embourgeoisement thesis, hamilton's concept of class can be accepted here. 20. harry braverman, op . c i t . and g. carchedi, op . c i t . address themselves to this problem and lend support to the thesis of proletarianization of certain segments ofthe middle class. 21. levison, andrew. the working class majority , new york: coward, mccann and geoghegan, inc. 1974. 22. levison uses strictly american data gathered from the u.s. cer.: us and the dept. of labor statistics. 23. see also richard sennett and jonathon cobb. the hidden injuries of class , new york: vintage books, 1973. 24. for example, see marion r. porter, john porter and bernard blishcn, does money matter? prospects for higher education , toronto: institute for beharioral research, york university, 1973. 25. harry braverman, op . c i t . p. 4 04. 26. ibid , p. 405. 27. andre gorz, in an earlier article "technical intelligence and the capitalist division of labor" in telos , 1972, points out that functions are important in the process of capital accumulation. ...we shall not succeed in locating technical and scientific labor within the class structure of advanced capitalist society unless wc start analyzing what functions technical and scientific labor perform in the process of capital accumulation and in the process of reproducing capitalist relations, (p. 27). gorz's statement, although it is speaking specifically of scientific and technical orployn.ent , could be applied to all these middle levels of employment which seem to be both proletariat and bourgeoisie. s4 johnson, leo. "the development of class in canada in the twentieth century" in gary teeple (ed.) capitalism and the national question ir, canada , university of toronto press, 1972. 37. harry braverman, op . c i t . pp. 350-351. 38. grecnbaum, joan. "division of labor in the computer field" in monthly review , vol.28, july-august, 1976, pp. 40-55. see also john and barbara ehrenreiih, "hospital workers: a case study in the 'new working class'" in monthly review , vol.24, *8, jan. 1973. 39. ibid , p. 41. 40. ibid , p. 42. 41. leo johnson, op. cit . p. 148, table 1. these figures are for the total petite bourgeoisie. also harry braverman, op. cit . notes these same changes in the occupationsl structure especially in the drastic reduction in the proportion of the population engaged in agriculture. 42. the political and ideological can react back upon the economic in a form of overdetermination. however, they react back upon the economic only within the limits set by the economic substructure. 43. this may be either productive or unproductive work. both carchedi op . cit . and leo johnson op. cit . allow that non-productive workers can be part of the working class and thus perform the function of the collective worker. however, nicos poulantzas, "on social classes" in new left review , 1973 assigns non-productive workers to the middle class specifically on the grounds that they are unproductive. thus for both carchedi and johnson the proletarianization of non-productive workers in the middle class is possible without changing their unproductive nature, while for poulantz.is this proletarianization is not possible save for a change from unproductive work to productive wor> . ss bibliography braverman, harry, labor and monopoly capital, monthly review press, 1974. carchedi, g. "on the economic determination of the new middle class" in economy and society, 1975. ehrenreich, john and barbara. "hospital workers: a case study in the 'new working class"" in monthly review , vol.24, #8, jan. 1973. goldthorpe, j.h. ct . al . the affluent worker: industrial attitudes and behavior , cambridge university fress, 1968. goldthorpe et.al . the affluent worker: political attitudes and behavior , cambridge university press, 1968. goldthorpe et .al . the affluent worker in the class structure , cambridge university fress, 1969. gorz, andre. "technical intelligence and the capitalist division of labor" in telos , 1972. greenbaum, joan. "division of labor in the computer field" in montnly review , vol.28, july-august 1976. hamilton, richard. class and politics in the united states , new york: wiley, 1972. johnson, leo. "the development of class in canada in the twentieth century: in gary teeple (ed.) capitalism and the national question in canada , university of toronto press, 1972. lenski, gerhard. power and privilege , new york: mcgraw-hill 1966. levison, andrew, the working class majority , new york: coward, mccann and geoghegan inc. 1974. marx, karl and frederick engels. the communist manifesto , international publishers, 1st published in 1848. mayer, kurt b. class and society , new york: random house, 195s. mckenzie, r.t. and a. silver. angels in marble: working class conser vatives in urban england , chicago: university of chicago press, 1968. porter, marion r., john porter and bernard blishen. docs money matter ? prospects for higher education , tctonto: institute for behavioral research, york university, 1973. 86 runciman, k.c. relative deprivation and social justice , berkeley: university of california press, 1966. scnnett, richard and jonathon cobb. the hidden injuries of class , vintage books, 1973. kestergaard, j.h. "the rediscovery of the cash nexus" in socalist register , 1970. zweig, ferdinand. the worker in an affluent society , london: heineman, 1961. 103 the keynesian revival: a marxian critique richard d. wolff1 abstract: the global economic crisis, unfolding since late 2007, has begun to undermine the hegemony of neoclassical economics and neo-liberalism generally, thereby provoking a widespread resurgence of keynesian economics in various forms. the historical adequacy of keynesian economics to modify, reverse or prevent capitalist crisis is criticized systematically. capitalism is shown to have exhibited repeated oscillations between private and state-interventionist forms for centuries, since neither proved capable of preventing recurring crises. an alternative to both neoclassical and keynesian responses to crises—a new kind of marxian response—is developed. it stresses micro-level transformations, adding them to balance the one-sided macro-focus of the traditional interpretations of marxism, socialism, and communism. keywords: economic crisis, keynesian economics, marxian economics, marxian critique a critique of the revival of keynesian counter-recessionary policies in the modern history of capitalism, keynesian counter-recessionary policies (broadly defined) have failed in two major ways. first, those policies have not consistently succeeded as means to end capitalism’s cyclical downturns. they failed, for example, to extract the us from the great depression of the 1930s. as this is written, their effectiveness in today’s global capitalist crisis is questionable. second, the promise that has almost always accompanied each application of keynesian policies 1 richard d. wolff is professor of economics emeritus at the university of massachusetts, amherst and currently visiting professor in the graduate program in international affairs of the new school university in new york city. wolff has authored many articles and books, often together with stephen a. resnick; their latest book is new departures in marxian theory (2006). wolff has written widely on the current economic crisis, produced a dvd and book, each entitled “capitalism hits the fan”, and made much of his work freely available at www.rdwolff.com. the keynesian revival: a marxian critique 104 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research everywhere—that it would also prevent future economic downturns—has never yet been kept. the keynesian policies have included varying mixtures of monetary (easing) and fiscal (expansionary) policies and market regulations (especially in finance). they have sometimes included controls on capital flows as well as subsidies, bailouts, and outright nationalizations of private enterprises. different combinations of these components characterize keynesian policies in different countries and at different historical moments. the chief means that actually ended capitalism’s downturns have been declines in the following: productive laborers’ real wages, finished product inventories, means of production prices, and the associated costs of securing profits (managers and other non-productive workers’ wages and operating budgets, taxes, access to credit, rents, etc.). once those declines sufficed to reach certain thresholds, capitalists could see profit possibilities and so resumed productive investment. that generated more or less “recovery” via multiplier and accelerator effects particular to each place and time. in short, capitalism is a systematically unstable economic system whose cycles are basic features of its normal functioning. keynesian policies have never basically altered that systemic instability. keynesian policies, i propose to argue, have largely provided quite secondary supports to the normal functioning of capitalist cycles. they marginally moderate the cycles’ amplitude and duration. they temporarily impose both costs and constraints on the profit-seeking activities of corporate boards of directors. in these ways, keynesian policies successfully buy both political space and time for the capitalist cycle to run through its usual downward phase. in the current global capitalist crisis, massive keynesian deficit spending, as well as credit-market bailouts have generated huge increases in many capitalist countries’ national debts. lenders eventually balk at further loans to the most over-indebted nations, demanding that they raise taxes and/or cut spending to qualify for more loans. if and when that proves politically impossible for lenders to impose on borrowing nations, multilateral agencies offer less onerous terms for loan assistance but with the same demand for austerity conditions. those conditions—conveniently imposed by others and not the national government—all serve to drive down wages and other costs of business and so once again set the stage for the usual capitalist cycle. besides their secondary role, keynesian policies also serve an important diversionary function. governments appear to be working mightily to “overcome the economic crisis” by implementing those policies with great fanfare. they thereby distract publics from yet another repetition of the normal capitalist’s cyclical downturn. exploding national debts, like other keynesian policy programs constitute an elaborate diversionary political theater. 105 as capitalist crises deepen and last, politicians of most persuasions increasingly express concern, compassion, and/or anger about mass unemployment, home foreclosures, bankruptcies, poverty, etc. they engage in heavily publicized debates and legislative contests over the appropriate monetary, fiscal, regulatory, subsidy, bailout, capital control, and private-enterprisetake-over policies to be executed by the state. these theatrics usually absorb the political energies of many left and right forces that might otherwise, separately or together, make the capitalist system itself the object of opposition, struggle, and transformation. left-tilting inflections of keynesian policies often include, for example, direct state subsidies to or hiring’s of un/underemployed workers, controls over private investment flows, and enterprise nationalizations. right-tilting inflections often include, for example, restrictions on immigration, reduced taxes on small businesses, and spending on business-friendly infrastructure construction. in the context of this argument, figure 1 below supports the basic irrelevance of keynesian policies to the basic contours of capitalist exploitation measured roughly by the relation between labor productivity and real wages.2 first, it covers a long period of us economic history: before, during, and after keynesian interventions occurred in their classic form in the 1930s. figure 1 reveals trends for manufacturing, in both labor productivity and real wages that show no systematic sensitivity to either the imposition or the negation of keynesian policies over the last century. the complex over-determinations of real wage and productivity movements were not much influenced by the rise and fall of keynesian policy regimes nor by whether neo-liberal/neo-classical economics or keynesian macro-economics prevailed in academic and policy-making circles. 2 graphically juxtaposing productivity and real wage trend lines is suggested by but not the exact equivalent to the marxian notion of surplus value (s/v or the ratio of value added less productive workers’ value of labor power – numerator to productive workers’ value of labor power – denominator). first, what contemporary statistical practice counts as manufacturing workers’ wages conflates both productive and unproductive laborers in manufacturing; marxian theory keeps these separate. second, the relevant variable for marxian theory–value of productive laborer’s labor power—is not equivalent to real wages, but is rather real wages adjusted for changes in the productivity of producing real wage goods. because of the difficulties in translating available statistics into their marxian analogues, i use here the available manufacturing productivity and real wage trends which allow me to substantiate the argument offered in the text. the keynesian revival: a marxian critique 106 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 1890 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 figure 1: productivity and the hourly wage (u.s. ecnomomy, 1890-2009) productivity real hourly wage (index: 1890 = 100; sources and details for figure 1: see appendix) indeed, the relatively laissez-faire period before the 1930s saw productivity and real wages rise more or less together, whereas productivity rose somewhat faster than real wages during the 1930s when keynesian policies were imposed. however, in the second half of the 1960s into the 1970s, during a second spurt of keynesian policies (johnson’s “great society”, etc.), productivity rose much faster than real wages. then, driving home the irrelevance of keynesian policies to the productivity-real wage relation, the extreme laissez-faire, neoliberal undoing of keynesian policies after 1980 then saw the last century’s most unequal of productivity to real wage ratios. the end of world war i marks the beginning of a near century of capitalist growth in the us (notwithstanding the great depression’s impact) that saw a self-reinforcing divergence between what workers produced for their employers (productivity) and what they were paid by their employers for doing so (real wages). capitalist cycles punctuated but did not basically alter that growth pattern.3 keynesian policies punctuated but did not basically alter the cycles, let alone the growth pattern. 3 this point parallels an argument about capitalist growth globally presented by david ruccio (1991). 107 for the working classes, the alternation between laissez-faire and keynesian policy regimes made little discernible difference in the long-run relationship between labour productivity and real wages. put otherwise, both regimes could and did facilitate growing gaps between productivity and wages over the last half century, much as earlier both regimes facilitated minimal gaps between them. in rough terms, the productivity of labor exceeded the real wage in 1890, the base year used to compute figure 1 above. that is, in marxian terms, workers produced a surplus for their employers already then. thereafter, that surplus grew both absolutely and relative to real wages. measured in value terms, the marxian metric, the rate of exploitation rose as us capitalism prospered across its cycles. alternations between keynesian and laissez-faire policy regimes, like the accompanying oscillations of theoretical hegemony between neoclassical and keynesian economics, were secondary side shows to the main event of rising exploitation. if workers in the us hoped that supporting the keynesian policies of roosevelt, truman, kennedy, johnson, nixon and others would alter their basic positions inside us capitalism, they were disappointed. notwithstanding their rising real wages from the 1940s to the 1970s and all sorts of political and cultural obfuscations (about everyone being “middle class” or the us being a “people’s capitalism”), the workers lived in the growing gap between their real incomes and the wealth of those who took the lions’ share of the surpluses they delivered to employers. their accumulating disappointment helps to explain some periodic disaffection of workers from the democrats. after real wages stopped rising in the late 1970s, workers increasingly defected even to clearly pro-business republicans (greenberg,1996). a critique of keynesian theory’s revival the laissez-faire (neo-liberalist) phase of capitalism that dominated the world economy over the last 30 years has crashed. that, in turn, has now challenged the hegemony of neo-classical economics as the theoretical rationale for celebrating private enterprise and free markets, privatizing public enterprises, and deregulating markets. keynesian economics is reviving (skidelsky, 2008). as states everywhere again intervene in the “private” economy—more massively than ever this time— keynesian economics provides many of the prescriptions and rationales for state economic interventions. with revival come renewed contestations among different interpretations of keynes. the differences reflect especially long-standing pressures upon keynesians from both the left (those who criticize them for “saving” capitalism) and the right (those who attack them for “threatening” capitalism). the most widespread keynesianism is what prevails in the treatments by most economics textbooks and among advisors to most governments now intervening in their economies to contain and the keynesian revival: a marxian critique 108 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research reverse the damages from the current capitalist crisis. this interpretation of keynesian theory rationalizes state interventions (especially expansionary monetary and fiscal policies and financial market regulations) in an otherwise private capitalism. it represents the predictable first (and quite moderate) phase of a keynesianism just emerging after 30 years of neoclassical theory’s near total hegemony. this keynesian theory’s goal is quite clearly to save capitalism from what it understands to be the dangerous consequences of laissez-faire (neo-liberal) policy regimes. most partisans of another interpretation, the relatively new variant sometimes called green keynesianism, want traditional monetary, fiscal, and regulatory policies redesigned to stress ecological goals (jones, 2008). they seem, at least implicitly, to offer an alliance, a political deal to the dominant keynesians. green keynesians will basically support the goal of saving capitalism in exchange for a keynesian policy package that makes capitalism significantly greener. thus, for example, green keynesians want expansionary deficit government spending to favor energy-saving mass transportation, installation of solar energy facilities, etc., while tax cuts should favor those who undertake pollution reduction. left keynesians typically want larger, more extensive, and more intrusive state intervention into the private economy. they seek state seizures of private enterprises when their demise threatens broad economic collapse (sometimes referred to as corporations “too big to fail”). they particularly favor state controls over investment and other capital flows, domestically and internationally, to limit and prevent those flows’ otherwise destabilizing effects. many left keynesians share the green keynesians’ goals and thus offer them an alternative political deal. instead of allying with the socially prevalent, rather moderate keynesians, the green keynesians are invited to see better chances of realizing their environmental goals with left keynesian policies in command. left-right divisions among green keynesians are now shaping who among them allies with whom. the furthest left keynesians advocate the most intrusive state interventions. many of them refer to such interventions as key parts of a transition to what they sometimes call socialism. allied with other kinds of socialists, including some marxists, the far left keynesians seek to expand state intervention to include officials permanently replacing share-holder elected corporate boards of directors and officials permanently controlling or even replacing markets (with more or less central planning of the distribution of resources and products). for them, those two permanent replacements define socialism.4 4 for a systematic critique of definitions of socialism in terms of state ownership and state planning, see resnick & wolff, 2002. we show there why and how capitalism has oscillated between private and state forms that are both as old as capitalism itself. 109 whether and to what extent any interpretation of keynesian economics can now displace the last 30 years’ hegemony of neoclassical economics will depend on all the economic, political and cultural processes shaping the contesting protagonists of both paradigms. those processes will simultaneously over-determine the outcome of disputes among alternative interpretations of keynesian economics.5 meanwhile and contrary to notions that neoclassical versus keynesian economics encompasses the total range of possible economic theory, the marxian alternatives offer something different from both of them. one particular marxian approach does not ally with any variant of keynesian economics; it stresses its differences from all of them. i want to develop that approach briefly here by noting first that it rejects the keynesians’ nearly exclusive focus on the macro-level of the economy. this marxian theory goes well beyond state regulation, controls, and ownership of capitalist enterprises (versus their private counterparts) and likewise beyond planning (versus markets). the hallmark of this marxian theory is an explicit micro-focus drawn from marx’s critique of the class structure of production. a marxian theoretical alternative this marxian theory begins from the historical observations summarized in this paper’s first paragraph.6 keynesian policies have not overcome the capitalist system’s inherent instabilities. nor have keynesian economists seriously measured, let alone found ways to eliminate, the vast and long-lasting social costs of that instability. as we now live through the second great crisis of capitalism in 75 years, we do know that its global social costs are again immense. between the end of the great depression and the onset of today’s crisis, the national bureau of economic research (nber) counts an additional eleven “business cycle downturns” that also generated large social costs (nber, 2008). so many large and small crises underscore marxian theory’s advocacy of changing the economic system as a solution for such crises, rather than repeated oscillations between neoclassical (private) and keynesian (state or state-interventionist) forms of capitalism. modern society can do better than capitalism. from the standpoint of this marxian theory, the failures of keynesian policies—and the keynesian economics that rationalize them—flow from their neglect of the micro-dimensions of capitalism. in short, the unattended contributor to capitalist instability is the relationship inside enterprises between the workers who 5 limited space and the main foci of this paper prevent a discussion here of the alternative, contesting variants of neoclassical economics. those constraints have also minimized attention to the different interpretations of marxian economics; such attention is available in resnick & wolff, 2006. 6 for the basic propositions of this marxist theory and its differences from alternatives, see resnick & wolff 1987; 2006. the keynesian revival: a marxian critique 110 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research produce the surpluses and the employers (e.g. corporate boards of directors) who appropriate and distribute those surpluses.7 because keynesian policies impose costs and constraints on employers in their exploitative relations with workers and in their competitive struggles within and across industries, those employers have great incentives to evade, weaken or end those keynesian policies. because employers appropriate the surpluses (and hence the profits) of enterprise, they dispose of the resources needed to respond positively to those incentives. that is what happened to roosevelt’s 1930s new deal and what has more recently been happening to much of western european social democracy (clayton & ponstusson, 1998). in both cases, the employers used the surpluses appropriated from their employees to move their societies back toward a laissez-faire policy regime as soon as they secured the political conditions enabling them to do so.8 macro-level efforts to control and constrain capitalism’s instability failed because of the capitalists’ continued appropriation and politically effective distributions of the surpluses produced inside enterprises. marxian theory emphasizes how employers’ decisions about distributing the surpluses are significantly influenced by the struggles between producers and appropriators of surpluses inside capitalist enterprises as well as by the competitive struggles among them. hence marxian theory suggests the internal transformation of enterprise structures. instead of their typical capitalist structures that split employers from employees, a post-capitalist structure would position workers as, collectively, their enterprise’s own board of directors—i.e. marx’s “associated workers.” the era of capitalist employers (e.g., corporate boards selected by and responsible to major private shareholders) would then have come to an historic end. the capitalist class structure of production would have been superseded by such a collectivization of surplus appropriation inside enterprises (wolff, 2010). for example, consider enterprises newly structured such that the workers produce outputs in the usual way mondays through thursdays, but on fridays, assembled in both plenaries and subgroups, they make decisions previously taken by boards of directors selected by (major) shareholders. that is, the workers democratically decide what, where, and how to produce and how to distribute their realized surpluses. they decide when and how to expand and contract. but they do not do that alone. they enter into co-respective power-sharing agreements with the local and regional communities where their physical production facilities are located. 7 a full exposition of how capitalist enterprises organize the production, appropriation, and distribution of surpluses can be found in resnick & wolff, 1987 (chapter 3). 8 an alternative mode of articulating this argument—one that uses the terms “private capitalism” and “state capitalism” to differentiate laissez-faire from crs policy regimes—is developed in resnick & wolff, 2002. there we extend the analysis to include the state capitalisms of the ussr and other “actually existing socialisms” which have demonstrated the same vulnerability to reversals back to laissez-faire or private capitalism as have crs policy regimes and for parallel reasons. 111 the workers participate in the residential communities’ decision-making processes and vice-versa.9 such a micro-based level of socialism becomes the necessary new complement to the classic macro-level socialisms that stressed socialization of means of production and planning over markets. indeed, the microand macro-levels of socialism would then support and, just as importantly, constrain one another. macro-level property socialization and economic planning would emerge from and be accountable to the micro-level collectives appropriating the enterprise-level surpluses they would use to enforce that accountability. at the same time, the micro-level enterprise collectives would have their production and distribution decisions constrained by the macrolevel (social) needs, priorities, and planning mechanisms (possibly co-existing with market mechanisms). this micro-level socialism supports genuine democracy inside each enterprise. it also creates the parallel economic partner for democratic political institutions in residential communities. democratic collectivities inside enterprises and their residential community counterparts would henceforth together reach their interdependent decisions. likewise, they would share their interdependence with macro-level institutions, both economic and political. today’s reviving keynesianism once again largely ignores the micro-level issues raised in and by the marxian criticism and alternative briefly sketched above. most keynesian programs now aimed to end the economic crisis, if they actually restabilized contemporary capitalism, would thereby initiate their own demise. that is, they would then repeat the historical pattern of oscillating back to a laissez-faire capitalism. the marxian alternative program that included the micro-level transformation of production sketched above would break, finally, from the repeated oscillations between private and state-interventionist capitalisms and the unnecessary social costs of capitalism’s instability. 9 a rich literature explores experiments in and analyses of such enterprises (producer co-operatives modeled on the mondragon enterprises in spain, yugoslavia’s worker-run enterprises, etc.) in which workers more or less appropriate and distribute the surpluses they produce; see gibson-graham (2006) for a theoretically sophisticated entrée into that literature. the keynesian revival: a marxian critique 112 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research appendix: sources for figure 1 [compiled by jason ricciuti-borenstein] 1. for wage series for manufacturing workers, 1890-2007 a. historical statistics of the united states (hsus), series d 765-778, “average hours and average earnings in manufacturing”, 1890 to 1926 b. hsus, series d 845-876, “average days in operation per year, average daily hours, and annual and hourly earnings, in manufacturing”, 1889 to 1914 c. hsus, series d 830-844, “earnings and hours of production workers in 25 manufacturing industries”, 1914 to 1948 d. hsus, series d 802-810, “earnings and hours of production workers in manufacturing”, 1909 to 1970 e. u.s. bureau of labor statistics, current employment statistics, “average hourly earnings of production and non-supervisory workers in manufacturing”, 1939 to 2007, http://www.bls.gov/ces/. 2. for consumer price index: f. hsus, series d 735-738, “average annual and daily earnings of nonfarm employees”, 1860 to 1900 g. hsus, series d 722-727, “average annual earnings of employees”, 1900 to 1970 h. u.s. bureau of labor statistics, http://www.bls.gov/cpi/. notes: the series was constructed first by converting the various hourly wage series into real values of 2007. second, in years for which multiple entries of the hourly wage existed, an average was taken such that: 1890-1914, average of sources a and b 1914-1919, b was the only source 1920-1938, average of sources c and d 1939-1948, average of sources c, d and e 1949-1970, average of sources d and e 1970-2007, e was the only source next, this hourly real wage series was converted into an index, in which 100 was set equal to the real hourly wage for 1890. 113 3. for productivity series for manufacturing output per hour a. historical statistics of the united states, series d 683-688, “indexes of employee output”, 1869 to 1969 b. u.s. bureau of labor statistics, http://www.bls.gov/lpc/ “industry analytical ratios for the manufacturing, all persons,” http://www.google.com/ search?ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&sourceid=navclient&gfns=1&q=supers eded+historical+sic+measures+for+manufacturing%2c+durable+man ufacturing%2c+and+nondurable+manufacturing+sectors%2c+19492003++ftp%3a%2f%2fftp.bls.gov%2fpub%2fspecial.requests%2fopt%2f lpr%2fhistmfgsic.zip c. u.s. bureau of labor statistics, http://www.bls.gov/lpc/, series id: prs30006092, 1987 to 2007 notes: the above data sources provide the annual percentage change in the quantity of output per hour for the manufacturing sector. the index was constructed as follows: 1890 to 1949, from source a 1949 to 1987, from source b 1987 to 2007, from source c year 1890 was set equal to 100. the keynesian revival: a marxian critique 114 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research references cayton, r., & pontusson, j. (1998). welfare state retrenchment revisited: entitlemet cuts, public sector retrenchment, and inegalitarian trends in advanced capitalist societies, world politics, 51(1), 67-98. gibson-graham, j.k. (1996). a post-capitalist politics. minneapolis: university of minnesota press. greenberg, s. b. (1996). middle class dreams: the politics and power of the new american majority. new haven and london: yale university press. jones, v. (2008). the green collar economy. new york: harper collins. national bureau of economic research. (2008). us business cycle expansion and contradiction. retrieved august 21 2010, from http://www.nber.org/cycles/cyclesmain.html resnick, s., & wolff, r. d. (1987). knowledge and class: a marxian critique of political economy. chicago: university of chicago press. resnick, s., & wolff, r. d. (2002). class theory and history: captalism and communism in the ussr. new york and london: routledge publishers. resnick, s., & wolff, r. d. (2006). new departures in marxian theory. new york and london: routledge publishers ruccio, d. f. (1991). when failure becomes success: class and the debate over stabilization and adjustment, world development, 19, 1315-34. skidelsky, r. (2008, december 12). the remedist. the new york times magazine [online]. retrieved december 12, 2008, from http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/14/magazine/14wwlnlede-t.html. wolff, r.d. (2010). taking over the enterprise: a new strategy for labor and the left.new labor forum, 19(1), 8-12. the collusion with patriarchy: a psychoanalytic account roberta hamilton this paper seeks an understanding within psychoanalytic theory for how people come to collude with patriarchal structures that oppress them. the bisexuality of the child, the distinction between basic and surplus repression and horowitz' analysis that surplus repression involves the repudiation of bisexuality is explored through the active and passive oedipal complexes . their 'normal' result involves monogamy , hetero sexuality and the denigration of femininity . the paper concludes that the struggles for sexual liberation belong at the centre of the struggle against capitalism and patriarchy . ttie most important insight that feminist theory and practice has given to traditional marxist theory is the insistence that the reproduction of the species, the institutions within which this occurs, and the entire network of relationships which result from it must be analysed if the nature of society is to be understood and transformed. within ma rx is tfeminist theory, this has led to the analysis of the role played by the family in perpetuating both the social relations of capitalism and patriarchy. while it is recognized, in the words of christopher lasch (1975) , that "the development of capitalism and the rise of the state reverberate in the individual's inner being,'' understanding the mediations for this interchange has proven an elusive task. it is not just marxists who have faltered in the attempt to understand why and how individuals collude with social and personal structures which exploit and oppress them, or for that matter why they resist, as miraculously they do, so often. it was dennis wrong who pointed out in his seminal article, "the cversocialized conception of man in modern sociology," that sociologists have tended to generate a view of man sufficiently "disembodied and non-materialistic to satisfy bishop berkeley, as well as being desexualized enough to please mrs. grundy" (1961:183-193). as a result, he argues, there has been a marked failure to keep in mind the long-time sociological and philosophical question: "how is it that man becomes tractable to social discipline?". he called for a sociological reassessment of the nature of man which would incorporate the findings of freud and psychoanalysis. and he did not have in mind the kind of truncated version of psychoanalysis that talcott etersons produced, extracting the concept of the superego from the rest of the theory to explain that men 42 internalise the values of their society. rather, wrong insisted that full weight be given to freud's understanding of the human psyche as a complex, conflict-ridden arena in which there is a life-long attempt to reconcile the desires of the material body with social possibilities. wiile mainstream sociology has, with few exceptions, resisted wrong's challenge, tending, as edward boldt pointed out, to return to symbolic interactionism and george herbert mead for an understanding of human motivation (1979:1-4), the particular intersection of questions posed by marxistfeminists are now leading to some tentative explorations of psychoanalytic theory, fl] what conjuncture of interests has brought this about? as eli zaretsky has put it (1976:133-34): marxists have rightly pointed out that society must organize the production of food, clothing and shelter, but they have forgotten that it must equally organize the sexual and instinctual life of its members and the process of human reproduction. this lacuna was, of course, particularly important to feminists whose primary concern with the hierarchical relationship between men and women, even in their intimate day-to-day encounters, led them to the appreciation expressed in the slogan, 'the personal is political.' the analysis that resulted from the marxist-feminist encounter led to the breakdown of the mystification that there were two autonomous arenas for human activity: the public world of work and social relations of production and the private world of the family and personal relations. [2] engel's (1948) understanding of the family as historically shaped by the particular mode of production has been extended to show the role of the family in capitalist society as both producer and reproducer of 'appropriate' kinds of labour power for capitalist enterprise and, also, as a unit of consumption for the products of that enterprise (zaretsky, 1976). the sexual division of labour, both in the 43 family and in the work world, has been analysed and used to help account for the perpetuation both of social relations of production and of patriarchy (armstrong and armstrong, 1978). ims work has, however, tended to rely upon superficial assumptions about human motivations. the collusion of men and women with the social structure has been variously accounted for by political and economic coercion, behavioural conformity and individual intention. it is not surprising that this inadequacy has been more acutely felt in marxistfeminist theory than in other theoretical perspectives. our interest in that intersection between social and economic structure and the behaviour of individuals has forced us to be peculiarly sensitive to individual resistance to change. we have had to wonder in new and bitter ways about the cliche, 'she is her own worst enemy. 1 kate millett's expression 'interior colonization' is an effective description but also raises questions about how and why. since our interest is not simply to understand the world but to change it, our theories are flawed if they do not include viable formulations about the nature of human beings. just as we need to understand the social structure in order to participate actively in its transformation, so we need to understand how the psychosexual structure of men and women will lead them to conform to, or to resist, the social order that they encounter. at the same time, the consequences of the transformations of social systems without the transformations of underlying psychosexual structure are becoming apparent. this, together with the lonaevity of capitalism and the tenacity of patriarchy, can lead us to unbecomingly cynical answers to the old questions, 'can men and women in fact live by bread alone, and under what circumstances will they demand more than that?' it has not been easy for feminists to turn to psychoanalysis. 44 freud's personal commitment to patriarchy was often reflected in his writings about women and have been an easy foil for feminist anger, f 3] this anger resonated with that of most marxists who believe that their theory is irreconcilable with freud. yet, as paul robinson (1969:3) argues, a serious controversy about the nature of freud's theories has long existed among the left: the question can be formulated in both political and sexual terms. did freud's theoretical achievement imply a revolutionary or a reactionary attitude toward the human situation? vvfes freud truly the apologist of sexual and political repression, drawing a picture of inevitable unhappiness, unfreedom, and aggression, or did his new science contain within it the promise of gratification, liberty and peace? in the last ten years or so, sparked by juliet mitchell's psychoanalysis and feminism (1974) , marxistfeminists have begun to draw out the radical implications of freud's theory as part of their attempt to show that patriarchy is not a universal but an historically specific phenomenon. [4] it is my own view that what we can have minimally from psychoanalytic theory are serious answers to questions about how and why women and men come to collude with the system of male dominance and female subordination and thereby participate in its perpetuation. it cannot explain why men are dominant and women subordinate. for that we must look elsewhere: to the implications of the unequal role men and women play in the perpetuation of the species and to the ramifications of the development of private property and social relations of production (hamilton, 1978: 104-05). here, i will argue that we internalise and legitimate this hierarchy in the course of the early development of our ego; that it becomes enmeshed in what we feel about or bodies, our behaviour and our actions, in our fantasies and dreams and in our self-concepts. in particular, in this paper i want to outline the specific kind 45 of contribution that i believe psychoanalytic theory can make: 1. it can account for, as freud put it (1965:116), how men and women are made in social terms and for how they are so tenaciously made. 2. it can account for the social reproduction of primarily heterosexual human beings out of bisexual human infants. 3. it can account for the social devaluation of what is perceived as femininity (with its more extreme manifestations in mysogyny) and the overvaluation of what is perceived as masculinity. the social reproduction of heterosexual men and women who place unequal value upon masculinity and femininity implies its corollary: that a whole range of needs, feelings, attitudes, desires and behaviours have had to be repressed in the process. [5] in other words, we have individuals who, in the course of their development, come to collude both with patriarchal and social structures. i would, of course, not argue that economic, political and social coercion do not play a crucial role in ensuring this conformity. i maintain, however, that the system does not, nor could not, rely simply on coercion to ensure that individuals perform the thousands of small and large acts which sustain it from day to day. lb start, "we must remember that in the beginning is the body" (wrong, 1961:183). radical feminists have had no difficulty with this departure. their concern has been with the social consequences of the biological differences between the sexes, differences which have made possible the reproduction of the species (firestone, 1970:12). the question arising from biological differences that has been posed most fruitfully within psychoanalysis is at what point, and in what ways, do these biological differences register themselves in the psychic development of the human child? before discussing this further, it is necessary to look briefly at freud's theory of ego development. qjr 46 interest is in that phase in the development of the ego (if indeed at all) that it becomes a gendered ego (wbllheim, 1975:65) . wiile marxists have had difficulty accepting the concept of repression, feminists have reacted negatively to the argument for penis envy. both these aspects of freud's theory have been the focus of new research, clarification, systematization and reformulation. the first concern is the link which freud drew between repression and civil ization. cn the surface at least, he advanced an image of the nature of man which is antithetical to marx's formulation. for marx, man's alienation from himself, from his fellows and from nature, is not an inevitable aspect of humanness but is historically specific, located in his alienation from the productive process and from the products of that process (marx, 1964:106-19). in an attempt to reconcile marx's theory with freud's concept of repression, herbert marcuse (1955), and more recently, gad horowitz (1977) have undertaken the task of analytically separating basic repression from vhat they call 'surplus repression.' vtiat is basic repression and vhy is it fundamental to the freudian account? under its rubric come many different processes. as horowitz says (1977:44-54), repression includes, for example, the physiological renunciation of certain infantile pleasures as the libido shifts to different areas of the body and sublimation, the process vhereby some neutralization and redirection of libido occurs (painting instead of smearing) . repression also explains the resolving of the oedipus complexes in which incestuous love objects are renounced and the subsequent identification with parental figures occurs. this neutralization, sublimation and substitution of desires occurs in the unconscious which operates according to its own laws and does not 47 recognize realities of time, space or 'logic.' the nature of the human child makes repression intrinsic to human development. on the one hand, she arrives on this earth dependent and helpless, unable to satisfy her bodily drives without the active intervention of caretakers. cn the other hand, unlike the young in the rest of the animal kingdom, she possesses no automatic script for the playing out of those drives. [6] what we have, therefore, is a small being alive with potential, but inevitable contradictions. she is not a tabula rasa , awaiting the imprint of her society. but, on the other hand, her dependence, helplessness and the very diffuseness of her drives means that she is unable to seek their gratification except insofar as they are being chanelled, fashioned, controlled, redirected and mediated by others. this process does not result only from the social pressures being exerted by the primary caretakers who engage in a "training" process. it is also very much a physiological process, in which the ego and the concept of the ego are developing in response to the body's sexual maturation. that is, the libido (the sexual instincts) successively organizes around four erotogenic zones, the mouth, anus, phallus and genitals. each stage does not simply replace the next but, in a dialectical fashion, the content of former stages persists in similar and altered forms within the new (wbllheim, 1975:64-65; horowitz, 1977:54). although with each successive stage, there is some repression of the wishes of earlier stages (it is unlikely even in the millenium that most adults would spend a lot of time sucking their thumbs) , marcuse and horowitz argue that, in our society, there is more repression at each stage than is called for by the requirements of ego development or civilization, (maybe thumbs would be better than cigarettes) . 48 repression is, then, our guarantee of humanness; in marcuse's words, (1955:38), it is that which enables the child "to transform the blind necessity of the fulfilment of want into desired gratification." but freud believed that the amount of renunciation necessary for civilization had become so intolerable that he could characterize man in society as discontented, even though man apart from society was a logical and practical absurdity. marcuse saw as his task, the rescuing of the idea of repression but without its devastating implications for man which freud foresaw. his solution was to separate repression into "basic" and "surplus" components. this was an analytic distinction only; for, in experience, they were intertwined. basic repression, necessary for civilization, is intrinsic to ego development and is not itself especially burdensome. surplus repression, which he posited, is by far the greater component, refers to renunciation in order that man accept patriarchal domination and toil. robinson (1969:232) refers to marcuse' s argument as follows: he was able to correlate the repression of pregenital sexuality with the economic needs of the capitalist order the requirement that libido be concentrated in the genitals in order that the rest of the body might be transformed into an instrument of labor. working with marcuse 1 s concepts, horowitz' contribution was to separate out what constitutes basic repression and what surplus repression. he has provided an analysis which explains the internalization of patriarchy and which has important implications for revolutionary feminism. horowitz' argument is that the main component of surplus repression involves the renunciation of all non-reproductive sexuality and therefore, primarily of bisexuality. in a society informed by scarcity, either actual or controlled, the libido will be free to pursue bodily pleasure insofar as it serves the perpetuation of 49 the species; i.e., heterosexual, genital sexuality. all other libidinal desires will be renounced and that energy will ultimately be redirected towards toil. this renunciation, firstly in the service of meeting human survival needs, but finally (and most evidently in capitalist society) in the service of the ruling class involves individual collusion with patriarchy. central to horowitz' critique is an analysis of the oedipus complexes and it is at this point that his analysis intersects with the concept of penis envy which, as i pointed out earlier, has been a particular 'problem' for feminists. freud posited the essential bisexuality of the human child (freud, 1965:116; wollheim, 1975:68). as the child proceeds through the first three stages of ego development (oral, anal, and phallic) she remains psychically bisexual. the biological differences between male and female do not yet register themselves psychically; for, the function of the dominant organ is experienced and represented in the same way in the two sexes (wollheim, 1975:68). it is, then, a psychically bisexual child wiich arrives at the oedipei stage. furthermore, for each sex, there is not one oedipus complex but two: the active and the passive. the resolution of these two oedipal dramas will determine the biological maturation of the child and its subsequent entry into 'human' society through the incorporation of the parents' social standards. when we consider the oedipus complex we can start with the assurance that for almost all children everywhere their first love object has been a female primary caretaker or caretakers. hi in our society, because of the nuclear family structure (fehich has taken its shape from, and in the course of, the development of capitalist social relations of production), it is likely to be one woman, the mother, who will carry out her mothering task in virtual so isolation from all other adults. v\hile a ma rx is tfeminist analysis has revealed the consequences of this for the hierarchical sex division of labour, the incorporation of a psychoanalytic account of ego development can demonstrate the manner in which children are prepared during their early psychosexual development for collusion with that structure. in other words, the renunciation of the oedipal complexes will also reflect the particular nature of the socializing society in our case, a patriarchal, heterosexual, sexually monogamous one, based on a sexual division of labour that the infant will have experienced profoundly through her primary caretaker, in all likelihood the female parent. under these circumstances, both sexes will emerge from the stage of pre-oedipal attachment and identification with the mother towards the inevitable mother-infant separation and the taking up of the mother as a love object. the father, because he distracts maternal attention from the child, is experienced as a rival. the male child fears that his father will do to him what he would like to do to his father; namely, castrate him. in such a struggle, the child acknowledges his powerlessness, represses his oedipal love for his mother, and compensates himself for his loss through identification with his father. this internalization of the father's standards forces part of the child's ego to split off into the observing and judging function viiich freud called the superego (1965:63-65) . this is the renunciation of the male child's active oedipus complex; "active" because active libidinal aims are called up in the desire to possess the mother. for the male child, however, the active aims are not forfeited, since he will one day have what his father now has. the vehicle for the incorporation of society's standards is, therefore castration anxiety. but, it is precisely this experience of castration anxiety which, horowitz argues si (95) , is felt much more intensely than it has to be because of the child's perception of the undoubted value of the penis, and what it represents in patriarchal society. the overvaluation (hyper-cathexis) of the penis in patriarchal society will also help determine the fate of the boy's passive oedipal complex. the male child will also take his father as love-object and see his mother as rival. when he realizes, however, that to desire his father means, in a patriarchal, heterosexual world, that he cannot have a penis, his desire for his father will arouse all the intense castration anxiety that was involved in his active oedipus complex. the 'normal' way to deal with this will be for him to repress not only his incestuous desire for his father in particular, but his homosexual desires in general, and therefore, his passive libidinal aims (including his desire to be penetrated) , for when roused they will summon up the anxiety surrounding castration (horowitz, 1977:95-103) . what he represses, then, are his passive aims which he equates with femininity since only females do not have a penis. these desires will be projected onto the female, who, as the possessor of those anxiety-creating desires, will be threatening (horowitz, 1977:108). she will have to be mastered or controlled and since this is an uncertain business, even in patriarchy hostility and contempt for women will also be summoned to aid in controlling his castration anxiety. the male repudiation of femininity, which ruth brunswick (1948:246) described as "what we have come to consider the normal male contempt for women," is an intrinsic feature of male psychosexual structure in patriarchal society. wbllheim (1975:68-69) puts it this way: "what women have suffered from over the centuries is man's inability to tolerate the feminine side of his nature." this, then, as 52 i understand it, would be, in skeletal form, the psychoanalytic case for male collusion with patriarchy. let us turn now to female children. like the little boy, the little girl will emerge from pre-oedipal attachment to her mother to the taking of her mother as her first love object. in freud's early formulations, the girl child passed directly from pre-oedipal attachment to her mother to the oedipal relationship with her father. he was, however, forced to reconsider (1965:119): we knew, of course, that there had been a preliminary stage of attachment to the mother, but we did not know that it could be so rich in content and so long-lasting, and could leave behind so many opportunities for fixations and dispositions. during this time the girl's father is only a troublesome rival: in some cases the attachment to her mother lasts beyond the fourth year of life. almost everything that we find later in her relation to her father was already present in this earlier attachment and has been transferred subsequently onto her father. more concisely put by brunswick (1948:236), "the pre-oedipal sexuality of the girl becomes her active oedipus complex with the mother as its object." the taking of the mother as love object will, however, be resolved in different ways by the male and female child. the little girl does experience her father as rival for her mother's attention, but this problem is soon eclipsed by a new dilemma. as she enters the genital phase she becomes aware of the significance of the fact that she does not have a penis and that a penis is what you need in a heterosexual world in order to possess your mother (horowitz, 1977:103). the resulting penis envy then has two sources: (1) the wish of the bisexual child to possess the organs of the other sex (penis envy, uterus envy, breast envy) , (horowitz, 104) and (2) the desire to do the things that having those organs permits one to do. lampl-de groot (1948:186) puts it this way: 53 the acceptance of castration anxiety has for her (the girlj the same consequences as for the boy. ' not only does her narcissism suffer a blow on account of her physical inferiority (the boy finds himself and his penis unbearably puny compared to his father; the girl finds her clitoris unimpressive compared to the larger and handier penis), but (secondly) she is forced to renounce the fulfilment of her first love longings. (just as the boy had to renounce his mother to avoid castration anxiety, the girl has to renounce her because, lacking a penis, she cannot possess her.) horowitz argues, however, that penis envy becomes intense penis envy, just as castration anxiety becomes intense castration anxiety for the male, because the phallo-centric civilization, the patriarchal, heterosexual world announces to the girl child that she cannot possess her mother, or indeed any other women, because she has no penis. she will be forced to repress not only her desire for her mother but also her homosexuality, in her case, her active libidinal aims. intense penis envy is for her then, just as castration anxiety is for the male, a repudiation of 'femininity.' but in her case, it is a repudiation of precisely what patriarchal civilization insists that she be feminine, i.e. passive and submissive. in this resolution of her active oedipal complex, she gives up her active libidinal aims. i have not yet dealt with the passive oedipal complex in which the girl takes her father as love object and experiences her mother as rival. by the time she turns to her father as love object, the girl child cannot be threatened by castration since, in the course of resolving her active oedipus complex, she has already accepted her 'castration,' and, more importantly, its implications (lampl de groot , 1948:186). as a result, she does not have the same motivation to renounce her father as love object. equally interesting, however, is why she takes him as a love object at all in a society in vrich he is not her primary caretaker. is it only, as freud suggested, in defensive flight from her active oedipal complex? "the girl is driven out of her 54 attachment to her mother through the influence of her envy for the penis and she enters the cedipus situation (with her father) as though into a haven of refuge" (1965:129). or is it, as nancy chodo row posits, (1978:160) , a question of seduction by her father? in other words, she responds to his treatment of her as a little girl. or is it, rather, a result of her 'essential' bisexual ity? wiile i would not deny the role of the first two processes, particularly in patriarchal society, i agree with horowitz that the acquisition of heterosexual genital aims by women (the acquisition of which is the species guarantee of survival; rape surely not being a viable alternative) cannot be an entirely learned behaviour (as chodorow seems to posit) and is rather one of the outcomes of the normal psychosexual development of a bisexual child (horowitz, 1977:115-116) . horowitz' aim is to show that the presence of these heterosexual genital aims is not incompatible with the retention both of pregenital sexuality and homosexuality. the male child need not give up his homosexuality and his passive aims and the girl child need not give up her homosexuality and her active aims, except in surplus repressive civilization (horowitz, 1977:106). the argument that both men and women repudiate femininity in the course of their early psychosexual development provides, i believe, a plausible explanation of the collusion of men and women with patriarchy. as v*>llheim (1975:97) argues, "psychoanalysis can at best explain why men and for that matter women have colluded", have conspired with the organization of society to secure male dominance and fer =1 e subordination. efert of this explanation demonstrates how both sexes come to repudiate their 'female' side, though only one sex is expected to live it. horowitz (1977:123) states categorically, "revolutionary 55 movements which do not revolutionize the psychosexual structure formed by surplus repression must fail, for this psychosexual structure is both product and source of domination." but if we are now trying to understand a world through such concepts as "basic" and "surplus" repression, are we in a realm that is not so much antithetical to marxist theory, as foreign to it? and if that is the case, how can we view the relationship between the dismantling of patriarchy and the overthrow of capitalism? at this point, i can only indicate where one important point of convergence would seem to lie. i would suggest that the concepts of objectification and alienation in marx have some affinity with the concepts of basic and surplus repression in marcuse and horowitz. psychoanalytic theory informs us that the young child's passage into human society involves an initial erotic dependence upon its primary caretakers, followed by the renunciation of that dependence and the internalization of the adults' socializing standards. this involves processes which horowitz describes as basic repression. intrinsic to this process, is the child's separation from her primary caretakers and, more especially, her growing realization that she is separate from the people and objects around her. in the course of ego development she moves from identification with the mother "briefly one may state that every successful act of identification with the mother makes the mother less necessary to the child" (brunswick, 1948:237) to objectification, the separation of the se! f from the other, the capacity to reflect upon oneself, that is to take oneself as object and to take the other as love object. this occurs in the very process in which she interacts with others and achieves growing mastery over her environment. compare marx (1964:113-114) who, we must remember, did not, like some of his 56 disciples, ever believe that consciousness started at the factory door: in creating a vvorld of objects by his practical activity, in his work upon organic nature, man proves himself a conscious species being, i.e. as a being that treats the species as its own essential being, or that treats itself as a species being .. .through and because of this production, nature appears as his work and his reality. the object of labor, is therefore, the objectif ication of man's species life: for he duplicates himself not only, as in consciousness, intellectually, but also actively, in reality, and therefore he contemplates himself [emphasis added] in a world that he has created. this activity in and upon the world commences with birth. we participate in the creation of our world even as we undergo its primary initiation rights. and this capacity for objectification is made possible through basic repression without which we could never experience separateness, without which we would never come to treat ourselves as the "actual living species" (marx, 1964:112). in our society, the human capacity of objectif ication turns against itself (marx, 1964:114): in tearing away from man the object of his production, therefore, estranged labor tears from him his species life , [emphasis added] his real objectivity as a member of the species and transforms his advantage over animals into the disadvantage that his inorganic body, nature, is taken away from him. in the very process of producing objects which will be controlled by others and used by others to enhance their life, man is alienated from his labour, the objects of his labour, himself and his fellows. his preparation for this has been lifelong, and his willingness is both the result and the cause of surplus repression, a surplus repression that has been fashioned by scarcity, real and controlled. for, in the course of renouncing many forms of bodily gratification, we renounce many pleasures to be found in our own company and in the company of others. this is true not just in directly sexual pleasures but in all the derivatives of sexuality including general sociability, affection 57 and in the activities arising from non-surplus repressive sublimation. we not only come to reflect upon ourselves, but also to experience a painful separation from self and from othersmarx's concept of alienation includes estrangement from self, other people and nature. its transcendence involves the reclamation of work and the productive process as the species activity of man. a psychoanalytic account informs us that our understanding of what constitutes 'work' must include all the activities in which we engage as we produce and reproduce our social world (williams, 1977:80, 91). its reclamation, therefore, must include the re-eroticization of the body, the retention of pregenital sexuality and the re-fusion of passive and active libidinal aims. such a perspective brings the struggles for sexual liberation away from the sidelines and into the centre of the struggle against capitalism and patriarchy. notes * an earlier draft of this paper was read at the annual meetings of the canadian sociology and anthropology association in saskatoon, june 1979. i would like to thank meg luxton (who was the discussant at that session) and, through her, heather jon m3roney, pat armstrong, john mcmillan and susan russell for their useful criticism of that draft. [1] mitchell, juliet; psychoanalysis and feminism , new york: pantheon books, 1974. there has been a debate in the new left review : richard wollheim (nlr 93 and 97), nancy chodorow and" eli zaretsky (nlr 96), the lacan study group (nlr 97). foreman, ann; femininity as alienation: women and the family in marxism and psychoanalysis , london: pluto press, 1977. chodorow, n=»ncy; the reproduction of mothering , university of california press, 1978. dinnerstein, dorothy, the mermaid and the minotaur . [2] morton, peggy, "women's work is never done," women unite toronto: women's educational press, 1972, pp. 46-68; smith, dorothy, "women, the family and corporate capitalism," women in canada , marylee stephenson, ed . general publishing co., 1977; hamilton, roberta, the liberation of women , london: allen and unwin, 1978. 58 [3] ada farber provides a thoughtful and sympathetic insight into freud's personal views on men and women through an analysis of his love letters to his fiance, martha bernays, in "freud's love letters: intimations of psychoanalytic theory," in the psychoanalytic review , vol. 65, no. 1, spring 1978, pp. 166-189. [4] see footnote 1. [5] it should be clear here, as throughout the paper, that i am talking only about the general case; the life history of any particular individual has its own specificity and requires its own analysis. it is equally important and interesting to investigate the conditions under which individuals depart from heterosexual ity and from societal concepts of masculinity and femininity but that is beyond the scope of this paper. [6] for example, the honey bee does not need to repress her desires in ordet for her to be willing to work until she dies of exhaustion. [7] nancy chodorow and ebrothy dinnerstein have both provided interesting accounts of the implications for human development of the universality of mothering as a gendered activity (footnote 1) . references armstrong, pat and hugh armstrong 1978 the double ghetto . mcclelland and stewart, toronto. boldt, edward d. 1979 "homo sociologicies" , society societe , 3, 1, pp. 1-4. brunswick, ruth 1948 "the preoedipal phase of the libido development", the psycho-analytic reader , robert fleiss (ed.), international universities press, new york. chodorow, nancy 1978 the reproduction of mothering . university of california press. engels, frederick 1948 the origin of the family, private property and the state . moscow: progress publishers. firestone, shulamath 1970 the dialectic of sex . new york: morrow. freud, slgmund 1965 new introductory lectures in psychoanalysis . new york: w.w. norton & co. 59 hamilton, roberta 1978 the liberation of women: a study of capitalism and patriarchy . london: george allen and unwin. horowitz, gad 1977 basic and surplus repression in psychoanalytic theory: freud , reich and marcuse . toronto: university of toronto press. lampl-de groot, j. 1948 "the evolution of the oedipus complex in women", in the psychoanalytic reader , robert fleiss (ed.) new york: international universities press. lasch, christopher 1975 "the family in history", new york review of books , november 13. marcuse, herbert 1955 eros and civilization . boston: beacon press. marx, karl 1964 the economic and philosophic manuscripts of 1844 . new york: international publishers. mitchell, juliet 1974 psychoanalysis and feminism . new york: pantheon books. robinson, paul a. 1969 the freudian left . new york: harper and row. williams, raymond 1977 marxism and literature . oxford university press. wrong, dennis 1961 "the oversocialized conception of man in modern sociology", american sociological review 26, pp. 183-93. zaretsky, eli 1976 capitalism, the family and personal life . new york: harper and row. 60 alternate routes comments by donald swartz when the organizers of this symposium gave me a copy of michael burawoy's stimulating examination of braverman's labour and monopoly capital , i found myself in a quandary as to whether i was expected to address michael's paper or braverman's book. as the time allocated didn't permit me to do both, i have decided to focus on michael's paper as i found some of his arguments quite questionable. my remarks will concentrate on three of burawoy's assertions which are, i believe, central to his critique of braverman. firstly, burawoy argues that the separation of conception and execution is an outcome of the division of labour and the scientific-technical revolution whereas braverman sees it as a consequence of the application of taylorism. secondly, burawoy disputes braverman's view that it was with the development of monopoly capital that it was possible to institutionalize this separation. instead, burawoy advances the periodization of capitalist development which essentially sees taylorism in its failure, giving rise to a scientific and technical revolution. the third assertion, which i will address myself to quite briefly, is burawoy's claim that braverman's analysis is pessimistic, as "he takes for granted the capacity of capitalism to survive class struggles and dismisses them as ineffectual outbursts". burawoy refers us to chapter six, "the habituation of the worker", with the comment "his title mirrors its content". in brief, i'm not persuaded by burawoy's analysis. it is important to note that part of the confusion stems from a certain weakness 26 symposium on braverman in braverman 's treatment of taylorism, which burawoy correctly picks up on. (i'll elaborate on this point in the course of my remarks). in general burawoy' s argument seems based on the view that braverman has not paid proper attention to working-class struggles in the course of american history (and elsewhere, insofar as braverman is talking about the development of monopoly capital generally). specifically, burawoy's analysis rests heavily on worker resistance to taylcrism. burawoy defines taylorism as the specification of task performance. he notes that it certainly gives rise to a management conception of the labour process but precisely because labour power can not be physically separated from labour, workers' conceptual faculties remain. thus burawoy asserts that taylorism simply results in a management as well as a worker's conception of the labour process. effective worker resistance historically to management's attempts to specify task performance means that the separation of conception and execution cannot be identified with taylorism. secondly, building on braverman and marx's argument that technological change is an attempt to increase efficiency and hence surplus value in the face of competition, burawoy argues first that efficiency, not control, is management's prime motive. to equate the two is to assume that taylorism generates efficiency, management knows this, and management has the power to impose taylorism on the work force. burawoy disputes these three assumptions. then, adding that the impetus to technological change can also come from class struggle (i.e: successful wage claims which render labour saving machinery profitable), suggests that taylorism, by intensifying class struggles, spurred the technicalscientific revolution which led to monopoly capitalism. taylorism is to be seen not as the hand-maiden of monopoly capitalism as braverman 27 alternate routes suggests, but as its mid-wife. and of course, the separation of conception and execution is a tendential result of the scientifictechnical revolution and the division of labour. now, it is important not to deny the control that workers exercise both over the method of performing their tasks and the pace at which it is performed, but to see taylorism only as the specification of task performance as burawoy does, is to misconceive, i think, what taylorism and scientific management were all about. as brian palmer has noted, referring to the united states, as late as the progressive era capital still lacked decisive control over the basic processes of work. what this lack of control involved is illustrated very well in the study by katherine stone of steelmaking prior to the homestead strike of 1892, which is an example contrary to many of those cited by montgomery, where the workers were decisively defeated. (among progressive historians seeking to reinterpret u.s. labour history, i think there is probably a tendency to confuse substantial and sustained working class resistance with victory). in essence, prior to that strike, the employers of the steel mills contracted with the unions to produce steel on a rate per ton basis. the organization of the labour process, the division of labour, the pace, manpower requirements, recruitment, wage differentials and training, were determined by the unions virtually unilaterally. quality levels, tools and techniques were substantially controlled by the union as well, and i quote from stone's study: "changes for the improvement of the mill required the consent of mill committees". the ground capital has covered since then is reflected in the public amazement when the postal workers demand the right to veto technological change. the key point here is that the scientific-technical revolution, 28 symposium on braverman just like taylorism, had to confront the control of workers over the production process. taylorism was no mere technique for specifying tasks but an expression of capital's demand for the control labour then exercised over the execution of the labour process; a demand that control rest with its hirelings, not those from whom surplus value was to be extracted. management would assume the responsibility to conceptualize the entire work process, decompose it into constituent task elements each geared to the capacities of "a first-class man", select and train workers to perform these tasks, determine wage rates and differentials based upon task requirements and performance, and control the progress of workers from task to task. in general terms, i am advancing a much more dialectical view of the relationship between conception and execution, and implying that there was a lot of conscious purpose in management's activities and thinking at the time. let us not forget marx's distinction of the human labour process and the way in which animals go about producing on an instinctual basis "--what distinguishes the worst of architects from the best of bees is precisely that the architect conceptualizes his structure in his imagination before he realizes it concretely". it is very important not to get lost in specific scientific management techniques, many of which were as farcical as those peddled by human relations experts today. scientific management, as palmer notes, was part of a general thrust for efficiency, whose proponents despite differences in technique found common ground in the objectives of specialization, standardization and simplification. to these points of consensus it should also be added that job hierarchies, and individual piece-rates (where possible) were also widely advanced to promote competition and individualism. this vertical structure had nothing to 29 alternate routes do with mechanization per se, as burawoy in quoting lukacs seems to imply, but rather was seen as necessary to the realization of surplus value in the context of conflicting objective interests between capital and labour. in taylor's words of earning to bosses preferring rules of thumb to 'scientific management', "when employers herd the men together in classes, pay all of each class the same wages, the only remedy for the men comes in combination". this broader view of taylorism is suggestive of the relationship between it and monopoly capitalism more generally. its implementation meant the development of the management cadre, responsible for conceptualizing the production process, production planning and control, personnel, etc.; in short, a large administrative component. it presupposes a certain scale of production and degree of market control without which taking on the substantial investment is not likely to seem feasible. the significance of the magnitude of the investment is reflected in statistics in the united states which show that between 1899 and 1923, the administrative component of manufacturing industries doubled from less than 8% to 15% of all employees, a tremendous increase in overhead. what i'm suggesting is that the division of labour, taylorism, and the scientific-technical revolution are not easily separable and pcriodizable but rather form a very integrated unity. this idea is reinforced when we consider the specific relationship between the growth of monopoly capitalism and taylorism in the united states. kolko, in his study of the progressive era, points out that the bulk of the merger movement which generated monopoly capitalism, began in the late 1880's and peaked between 1897 and 1901. the date most commonly associated with the beginnings of the movement to establish industrial 30 symposium on bravennan management as a profession subject to scientific laws was 1903, when taylor addressed the american society of mechanical engineers. in other words, when one looks at the timing of the transformation of the structure of industry and one looks at the tremendous growth in all forms of 'scientific management' organizations etc., one sees a very close, indeed inseparable, linkage between the two processes. finally, it is important not to overlook the significance of scientific management as an instrument of the bourgeoisie's struggle for ideological hegemony, by undermining the working class's selfconception and its sense of its own worth, much of which was bound up in the image of the craftsmen. as palmer notes, "called into being by the structural imperatives of the developing industrial capitalism which required to refine the division of labour, 'efficiency' fulfilled another more specific function. in relegating the labouring man and the capitalist to their respective positions in the hierarchy, the new managers buried the populist conception of labour and took a long forceful stride in the direction of lessening working-class autonomy on the shop floor". in a sense (to use one of burawoy's concepts), the whole thrust for efficiency, including scientific management, was directed toward the process of obscuring surplus by suggesting that surplus came not from direct productive labour but rather from the skills and abilities of management. now let me briefly turn to the question of braverman's pessimism. i will confine my remarks to the now-infamous chapter six, whose title in my view does not at all mirror its content. braverman, to me, is talking about the post-taylor evolution in management thought and practices to some extent, which to quote braverman "do not by and large concern themselves with the organization of work but rather with the 31 alternate routes conditions under which the worker may be brought to co-operate in the scheme of work organized by the industrial engineer". braverman begins by overviewing the various subtle manifestations of working class resistance: absenteeism, output restriction, sabotage, as well as overt hostility to management (i.e. strikes). he is derisive in his treatment of management efforts to gain labours' co-operation. in his conclusion he directs our attention not to the apparent acclimatization of the working class but beneath it, to "the hostility of workers to the degenerated forms of work which are forced upon them... this hostility renews itself in new generations, expresses itself in the unbounded cynicism and revulsion which large numbers of workers feel about their work, and comes to the fore repeatedly as a social issue". if anything, such assertions promote optimism (and perhaps even adventurism) . conversely, it is burawoy rather than braverman whom i find pessimistic. his analysis of games of habituation which focusses particularly on surface adaptation of workers to capitalism, it seems to me, contradicts his shouting of class struggle from the rooftops in criticizing braverman. moreover, his conclusion too is pessimistic -in looking to contemporary theories of capitalist crisis and breakdown to jolt labour into revolutionary action. crisis and breakdown are no automatic economic event but presuppose the working class strong enough to counter bourgeois efforts to resolve the contradictions of capitalism at the expense of the working class. without addressing the question of how to build that strength, there will be no revolutionary crisis, but poverty, unemployment, and loss of freedom. and i think, in conclusion, the way to build upon braverman is to build upon the various manifestations of class struggle which are very obviously often individualized, localized, union as opposed to community or 32 symposium on braverman industry or more broadly class-based, and to try to build out of those manifestations an understanding of how to generalize them and how to broaden them into the kind of consciousness which will give the working class the capacity to create the political crisis which may lead us to a new era. -end -33 the state of cultural theory: a review of past and present fashions debra clarke it is always important to situate distinctive theoretical developments within the historical conditions of their emergence, yet, in order to fully appreciate the substance of developments within cultural theory, the task seems imperative. there are several reasons. firstly, much of what can now, in retrospect, be identified as distinctive modes of cultural thought arose within and remained peculiar to a specific geographically-bound location, whether a nation or a continent -nowhere, for example, is there more apparent a fundamental rift between theoretical modes than that between north america and the european nation-states. secondly, and paradoxically, a close inspection of the essential propositions characteristic of each reveals some profound parallels, despite the diversity of their material origins. the points of interpenetration between and among new and old schools of cultural thought are sometimes considerable, and the analysis of relations between schools can often tell more about the way culture has been 'thought' than the analysis of any single case. thirdly, cultural theorizing is at the present moment so confused and unstable that any discussion of its material development can only aid understanding. the present discussion works towards that end. one of the more visible cases of cross-fertilization between modes is the relation between the frankfurt theorists and u.s. currents of the war and post-war periods. while the frankfurt theorists summoned a considerable authority in their own right (and, importantly, in their own place and time) , their work also later shaped nascent american modes of thought about culture: indirectly, through the export of whole propositions and cultural conceptions; and directly, through the exile of individual frankfurt theorists to the united states. their importance for the subsequent development of theoretical traditions in their adopted homeland, especially for the development of mass society theory, should not be underrated. the seeming novelty of mcluhanism in the 1960s supplied one of the few contrasts to the otherwise unilinear development of cultural theory in north america throughout the post-war era. these developments will be outlined first, while later discussion will look to the very different course traversed by european theorists, especially those in britain, a major site of the current theoretical struggles. it is here that more contemporary attempts to theorize culture have been vigorously pursued. a major concern will be to trace the origin and development of the new 'cultural studies', most closely associated with the centre for contemporary cultural studies at the university of birmingham. lastly, and relatedly, there will be a brief attempt to isolate some sources of the current divisions within "m.irxist cultural theory" and to assess, in light of these divisions, the 106 possibilities for a truly materialist analysis of culture. space limitations demand that a good deal be assumed, and that important facets of the literature be excluded. it will not, for example, be possible to outline with rigorous detail the major precepts that delineate each perspective. instead, our prime purpose is to demonstrate the operation and recurrence of several overriding weaknesses threaded through all of these attempts at theorization; among them, the absence of a well-integrated model of stratification or class conflict. it will be argued that the development and articulation of the assorted theoretical modes was in every case heavily conditioned by (1) the historical circumstances of the assorted cultural theorists, which in turn shaped (2) the means in which 'culture' was conceptualized: aesthetically, anthropologically, or as something more broadiy social. much of this is revealed through the treatment (or 'non-treatment', which is more often the case) of class conflict or even simply some notion of 'social' conflict devoid of class connotations. the failure to incorporate stratification models into their theories about culture led there various theorists to start with either a non-stratified or crudely stratified notion of the way that societies are organized, and hence left then illequipped to account for the place of culture therein. the radical pessimism of the frankfurt theorists established in 1923 as a (somewhat unique) centre for marxist studies, the institute for social research at frankfurt was concerned throughout the twenties with the problems of labour and the labour movement, and combined solid empirical work with serious theoretical analysis. anderson (1976: 32) claims that the institute occupied a pivotal point of juncture between "western" and "eastern" marxist currents during the twenties, and thus its trajectory was crucial to 107 the progression of marxist theory in intcr-war europe. the year 1950, however, threw doubt on its role when llorkheimer assumed control of the institute (following grunberg's retirement), at the same time that lukacs was exiled to austria and gramsci was censored, in the interests of his personal safety, even while in prison. horkheimcr was a philosopher whereas his predecessor was a historian. at the outset he established a new orientation to the institute's work, one that meant less concern with the science of historical materialism and a greater concern with "social philosophy". soon afterwards the institute ceased to publish the archives for the history of socialism and the workers' movement , and in its place introduced the new journal of social research . however tamed in its outward appearances, the 1933 n'azi victory drove most institute members to the united states, where a new institute was constituted at columbia university a year later. here it was transferred "into a political environment devoid of a mass working class movement even formally committed to socialism, or of any substantial marxist tradition" (anderson, 1976: 33). by the time of its return to frankfurt in 1949-50, the institute's period in the states, and the conditions of that period, had already circumscribed the character of the work. most of the formative work on aesthetic theory, however, was elaborated and shaped during the preand post -exile moments of the thirties, a time of titanic class struggles in austria, france, and germany. it was in the turbulent climate of this period that the frankfurt theorists concluded that marx's projection of capitalist development could no longer be sustained: massive state intervention in the market, the reification of the place of technology and science within the mode of production, and the growth of a consunptionist working class rendered, in their view, the classic marxist idea 108 of class struggle obsolete (see swingewood, 1977: 10-18). therborn argues that the impact of their experiences with fascism was so great that it'was reified in their subsequent critique of american society, preventing them from making a scientific analysis of american monopoly capitalism, or developing a revolutionary practice' (1970: 69). what is most problematic about the frankfurt defeatism is that it survived long enough to colour a good deal of later theoretical work (their own and that of others) . a theory of mass society or mass culture was worked out well before their exile to the united states, where it was transferred wholesale to the somewhat different social circumstances of a north american case. the historical sepcifics of 1930s germany were generalized to explain the underdevelopment of working class revolutionary potential throughout the western capitalist world, and it would not be much of a stretch to argue that their historical fatalism, born out of a complex and highly particularized historical moment, grew to underline and characterize both orthodox and unorthodox marxist analyses of culture. the original impetus to the construction of mass society propositions, complete with visions of "masses duped into false beliefs and bourgeois values", re-appears in later theories of "late capitalism" where, in the work of too many contemporary marxists, the very use of the phrases "implies that the historically necessary collapse of capitalism has been averted by the conscious ideological and cultural manipulation of the bourgeoisie over the proletariat" (swingewood, 1977: x) . while it is scarcely a widely held position, swingewood argues that the development of the capitalist mode of production has served to augment, and not destroy, civil society. its development has led to a highly complexified socia} structure where the key institutions of trade unions, political parties, professional associations, and 109 communications apparatuses arc not dominated by a massive and omnipotent state. on the contrary, these institutions exercise a tremendous and unprecedented mediating influence that has only now become fully realized in social practice. the emergence of a new and strengthened network of social relations (wherein, for example, working class organizations come to the fore) means that "a far more delicate balance of forces is now capitalism's most characteristic feature" (1977: ix-x) . those contemporary marxists who suffer the hangover of frankfurt-style defeatism operate with a monolithic concept of social structure that cuts short the dialectical movement: as swingewood expresses it, "of course the modern state grows in size and complexity, but as capitalism strengthens the sphere of direct domination so it necessarily creates the basis of a powerful civil society" (1977: x) . although swingewood never identifies his alignment explicitly, this is a more properly gramscian position. to briefly illustrate the kinship with gramsci, we can simply cite a statement from a 1917 av.int i ! article, titled, significantly enough, "towards a cultural association": at a certain moment in its development and its history, the proletariat becomes aware that the complexity of its life lacks a necessary organization. thus, it creates one for its own ends, with its strength, and with its good will ... this need will also come into being and be felt in other parts of italy (other than turin, where institutions like the co-operative alliance were already strong). and the proletariat movement will thereby grow in compactness and victorious energy (gramsci, 1975: 97). at the very least, then, there is a need to re -introduce a dynamic into theories about culture. tlainly, there is a good deal more to the process than some simple one-way (and therefore inevitable) domination from above; yet this one-sided and 'one-dimensional' account underlies and pervades the works of both the frankfurt theorists (notably adorno and marcusc) and later u.s. mass society theorists. 110 swingewood's argument also suggests that at the root of frankfurt and mass society conceptions lies the equally fundamental problem of agency (and with it, the problem of determination). the radical pessimism of the frankfurt theorists amounted to historicism, and traced to their own 'crisis of confidence' in the recalcitrant capacities of the working class. the problem of mediation was, at this early stage, resolved through elimination; the supposed "mass society" contained no mediatory or oppositional institutions, let alone working class institutions and organizations. once mediation is tossed out, notions of agency quickly follow; the working class was deemed somehow inherently unable to countervail the overpowering reifications brought about with the fascist regime. faced with a world that appeared beyond human control, a concept of human agency became difficult to digest, and hence the frankfurt theorists preferred to regard workers (or rather, masses) as resigned and passive, fully prey to powerful, emergent political movements like nazism (see swingewood, 1977: 11-12). the 'crisis of confidence' in working class potential and in the mediating possibilities of particular institutions is evident in the work of adorno, horkheimer, marcuse , and numerous others writing at much later points (see, for example, sallach, 1974). the notion of a weak civil society is re-affirmed in mills' influential work, the power elite , published in 1956. one might usefully ask how it is that gramsci managed to surpass the problem in his theorizations about culture and working class potential. is it possible to introduce a concept of agency without instantly inviting charges of voluntarism (to which gramsci is always subject)? the frankfurt kind of radical pessimism does not enter his thought, although gramsci pondered the same problems while subject to similar historical conditions. yet for adorno, horkheimer, and the others, 111 history was everything. during the thirties, these thinkers bore witness to the rapid rise of fascism and the complete collapse of european socialism; it seemed that the forces of total reaction had seized the working class and that neither liberal democracy nor the labour movement could withstand the pressures or respond with sufficient strength. many years later, horkheimer disclosed the reasoning behind their original affiliation with marxist thought: already near the end of the twenties, certainly by the beginning of the thirties, we were convinced of the probability of a national socialist victory, as well as of the fact that it could be met only through revolutionary actions. that it needed a world war we did not yet envisage at that time. we thought of an uprising in our own country and because of that, marxism won its decisive meaning for our thought (foreword to jay, 1973). * whatever 'decisive meaning' marxism might have had at that early stage was soon extinguished when it became apparent that the collapse of liberal democracy would come about "not in the way marx had predicted but rather from the combined forces of totalitarian politics (fascism) and totalitarian economics (the growth of giant monopolies and cartels and the fusion of banking and industrial capital)" (swingewood, 1077: 13). this made possible their desertion of orthodox marxist principles of determination and led ultimately to a more or less complete loss of commitment to a marxist account of capitalist development. there are parallels here with the theoretical results of similar disenchantments among british marxists of the 60s and 70s, and these will be discussed later. at this point it should simply be stressed that the absence of a spontaneous uprising, originating within the german people, led horkheimer and the others to dismiss the working class entirely as a potentially revolutionary force -not just the german working class, but the working class-in-general, and this in turn enabled them to easily transfer their conclusions to the american case, where the u.s. 112 'culture industry' (a concept preferred to 'mass culture') could be equated in its consequences with the german fascist state. within this account lies a crucial difference between their conclusions and those of gramsci. whereas the frankfurt theorists developed their notions about cultural potentials and about the future of capitalism itself on the basis of the historical specifics of their own time and place, gramsci took as his task the development of a whole theory of revolution and of the state through his analysis of 'what went wrong 1 in 1930s italy. this was the raw material of his analysis of 'late capitalism' and of the state, and on this basis gramsci attempted to specify the appropriate meterial-cultural conditions under which revolution might be possible and to formulate revolutionary strategies. the difference in theoretical outcomes also points to gramsci's position as simultaneously marxist theorist and key political actor of his period -not true of the frankfurt theorists, who chose to abandon the political struggles of their homeland and to make sense of these struggles only once safely in exile. apart from the kind of elitism contained in their dismissal of the working class, there is, in the work of adorno and horkheimer particularly, a familiar elitist conception of culture, though in a somewhat disguised form, where 'high' culture is the means to transform social order through the spread of a critical consciousness. 'critical' is used in a sense that echoes the appeals of matthew arnold (see later discussion). although the charge is always easy to level, there is also an idealism at work in their underlying theory (or 'non-theory') of social change, one that is later wholly adopted by mass society theorists in the united states. it is most apparent in their later analyses of 'modern* (i.e. u.s.) totalitarianism, where mass culture itself is seen to be the major dctcrmin.ir.t . 113 on the one hand, it is possible to draw at least a tentative epistemological parallel between the early frankfurt work (i.e. pre-1940) and so-called 'immanent structural analysis' (see slater's argument, 1974). one of the institute's official histories explained that "we interpret art as a kind of code language for processes taking place within society, which must be deciphered by means of critical analysis" (cited in jay, 1973: 177). on the other hand, jay suggests (1973: 178) that their sociology of art refused to reduce cultural phenomena to ideological reflexes of class interests. it is more certain that adorno, at least, refused to engage in a class analysis of culture; instead, he argued that "the task of criticism must be not so much to search for the particular interest-groups to which cultural phenomena are to be assigned, but rather to decipher the general social tendencies which are expressed in these phenomena and through which the most powerful interests realize themselves" (1967: 30). it seems that adorno and the others (perhaps including benjamin) were unable to glean anything more than a crude rudiment of cultural theory out of orthodox marxism, which, in their view, reduced all culture to 'a bourgeois swindle' and all art to false consciousness or ideology. exasperated by a vain serach for a theory of substance in marx, the frankfurt theorists substituted their own "dialectical or immanent critique of art" which "takes seriously the principle that it is not ideology in itself which is untrue but rather its pretension to correspond to reality" (adorno, 1967: 32). disastrously, it effectively turned marx and marxism upside down, and became inductively non -dialectical . one example of the attempt at a 'dialectical anti-reductionism' lies in adorno's treatment of one major marxist category, commodity fetishism. on this point (among others) adorno disagreed with benjamin, to whom he wrote on 114 2 august 1935 that "the fetish character of commodities is not a fact of consciousness, but dialectic in the eminent sense that it products consciousness" (cited in jay, 1973: 181; emphasis added). more evidence of the frankfurt antagonism to marxist orthodoxy can be found in their relations with benjamin, and particularly in their distrust of his relationship with brecht. brecht was admired by the institute members for his literary and theatrical accomplishments and simultaneously despised for his 'crude materialism 1 . there are important ways in which benjamin's work distinguishes itself from the work of adorno, horkheimer, and notably lowenthal, and significantly enough, benjamin's biography and his pre-war experiences set him considerably apart from the others. throughout the thirties, for example, he continually resisted the pleas of other institute members to join them in new york, arguing, as late as 1938, that 'there are still positions in europe to defend' (cited in jay, 1973: 197). benjairin never did rake it to the united states, and ultimately committed a tragically needless suicide when denied passage across the franco-spain border durinr a final, resigned effort to flee europe in 1940 (see jay, 1973: 197-198). the institute had not been "entirely enthusiastic about the brand of varxism benjamin adopted in the mid-twenties" (jay, 1973: 201). unlike the others , benjamin first encountered historical materialism immediately following the first war and, unlike the others, was active in the pre-wwii zionist movement, president for a time of the berlin free student association, and frequent contributor to the journal of gustav wynckcn's youth movement, per anfang (jay, 1973: 159). in addition to the institute's discorfort with his acceptance of brecht's 'crude materialism', adorno and others were disturbed th;it benjamin seemed to share brecht's optimism about the revolutionary 115 potential of popular art and technological innovation. on the other hand, brecht's attitude towards the institute was not altogether supportive; he regarded them all as 'tui-intellcctuals' who prostituted themselves for american foundation support (jay, 1973: 201-202). there is also considerable evidence to suggest that benjamin's essays (including the seminal piece, "the work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction") were often considered 'too radical for their taste' and substantially censored prior to their publication in the zeitschrift (jay, 1973: 206). benjamin, therefore, and his 'radical optimism' should be set apart from the general work of the institute pior to 1940 and from what is now referred to as 'the frankfurt school', since he alone reserved hope for the progressive nature of politicized, collectivized art that accompanied the (mass) mechanical reproduction of artistic and other cultural commodities. the contrast between benjamin and adorno is outlined by benjamin himself in a letter to the latter: "in my work i sought to articulate the positive moments as clearly as you brought the negative to the fore. i consequently see a strength of your work where a weakness of mine lay" (cited in jay, 1973: 211). his death in 1940 marked the end of any optimistic, revolutionary, or dialectical thrust in frankfurt cultural theory, and the institute's subsequent work on mass culture in the 1940s pursued and became limited to static, nondialectical, empirical studies of, for example, newspaper content. now fully settled in america, institute members proceeded to weld themselves more tightly into this mold by eradicating agency once and for all and by arguing that culture was now completely divorced from material production and life. horkheimer, for example, sowed the seeds for american mass society theory when he suggested, in a 1942 letter to lowenthal, that reception and absorption had fused into the 116 same moment, wiping out very definitively notions of subjectivity, voluntarism, or agency: you lay too much stress on activity vs. passivity, sphere of production vs. sphere of consumption. you say that the life of the reader is scheduled and governed by what he gets, not by what he does. the truth is, however, that doing and getting (have) become identical in this society (cited in jay, 1973: 213). and it was marcuse who argued in 1937 that "the segregation of cultural life from its material base serves to reconcile man to the inequalities implicit in the latter" (jay, 1973: 215). not only was any notion of agency discarded, but so also was any concept of mediation and therefore resistance. in light of these developments, the historical and intellectual background to marcuse's one-dimensional man of 1964 scarcely needs to be sketched. in so many ways, it marked the crescendo of all previous frankfurt work, complete with all of its endemic theoretical faults. radical pessimism and conservative optimism: the u.s. jay suggests that it was the institute's critique of mass culture and its related analysis of the american authoritarian potential that most strongly influenced the texture of american intellectual life (1p"3: 217); firstly, because a good portion of the work was available in english, and secondly, because it coincided with a growing distrust of mass culture on the part of indigenous american intellectuals. prior to world war ii, sociologists like robert park and his student herbert blumer had conducted relatively isolated and somewhat more optimistic studies of 'mass society'. the mid-forties, however, witnessed a new and renewed interest in the area, and it quickly became fashionable inside and outside the academy. riesman (the lonely crowd) and others popularized the fashion, and the work of the institute added substance and momentum to the attack (see jay, 1973: 117 217). swingewood argues, in response to all theories that first posit a 'mass' of undifferentiated non-persons, that 'consumer capitalism, rather than creating a vast, homogeneous and culturally brutalized mass, generates different levels of taste, different audiences and consumers. culture is stratified, its consumption differentiated' (1977: 20). yet so overpowering has been the impact of 'mass' theories on all areas of empirical and other work on culture and communication that only recently has it been possible to re-introduce, or perhaps posit for the first time, the notion of a stratified audience (see, for example, the work of morley, 1975 anj 1980). moreover, 'culture' itself was reified through the progressive, or rather regressive, articulation of mass society theories. '.vhere, for example, is there any careful, thoroughgoing discussion of what culture really means or any critical re-thinking of the traditional definitions? furthermore, and this is a condemnatory feature of both the mass society and 'culture industry' arguments, the concept of culture 'is severed from production in all but a general and superficial sense; culture is thus transformed into an independent, autonomous realm of human activity (or lack of activity) explicable in terms of its own norms and concepts' (swingewood, 1977: 25). finally, and perhaps most importantly, there is nothing intrinsically unifying about culture, just as there is nothing intrinsically functional about cultural or ideological state apparatuses; it seems at least as likely that culture can be a divisive force. indeed, if culture is 'a whole way of life', then there is clearly no such thing as a singular, all-embracing 'culture of capitalism'. there are many cultures, and many cultural forms, some of which are appropriated by class-bound groups and some of which are not -however, in the lonjrun , one's 'whole way of life' is, necessarily, heavily conditioned by 118 and intimately bound up with one's place within capitalist social relations of production ; consumption merely sumptomatizes this fundamental relation. the theories of mass society and mass culture that came to characterize much of cultural theorizing in the united states hark back much further than the frankfurt thinkers to tonnies' gemeinschaft/gesellschaft distinction and to the classical works of comte, spencer, durkheim, and weber on the general theme of the effects of industrialization and urbanization. in its contemporary formulations, the new 'mass' media are linked to 'mass' behaviour and then to a new 'mass' culture or mass society, and all this without benefit of historical analysis. the first major problem, then, with later and current versions of mass society theory is that the existence of media of mass communication is first taken as given, and not explained within an account of historical transformations within capitalism that initiated and fostered the rapid growth of mass market production and the mass reproduction of artistic and cultural commodities, which in turn transformed the media into a 'necessary' and 'natural' feature of class domination. overwhelmingly obvious is its underlying organic-functionalist model wherein all the pieces of the puzzle (mass media mass behaviour mass culture mass society) fit neatly into their allotted and expected roles, a fault made possible by the ahistoricism of the approach, which severely constrains a thorough de-mystification of the media 'effect'. among other things, the leap between 'mass media' and 'mass behaviour' is far too great, and, considering the obsession with 'doing empirical work" on the media, it is remarkable that few or no studies set out to establish this alleged relationship empirically. if anything, the volumes of (largely american) empirical studies of 'media effects' are, at best, inconclusive (see klapper, i960). 119 a second najor problem concerns the absence of a model of stratification, a silence characteristic of all the approaches discussed here and not unique to u.s. mass society theory, although more outstanding in its case. even writers situated on the left, like c. wright mills, operated with no more than a crude concept of stratification (i.e. one large mass and one small elite or elites), and wholeheartedly absorbed and reiterated the reportedly frightful consequences of mass media production. it was mills who argued, in the power elite , that 'the media, as now organized and operated, are ... a major cause of the transformation of america into a mass society' (1956: 315). in a thoroughly non-marxist fashion, mills proceeded to argue that the mass media 'created' new forms of dependence and made 'the (classless) masses' newly vulnerable to greater control under power-wielding elites. miliband reproduced a similar argument some time later in the state in capitalist society (1969) and again in marxism and politics (1977). the dependence of the individual is intensified by a lack of reciprocal, obligatory moral attachments to others, spurred on by rapid industrial expansion and the existence of disparate value systems, which in turn forced the individual to rely more on extraneous media of communication than on primary group or interpersonal relations in developing a world-view. the centralized authority of mass communication systems thus came to take precedence over micro-social forces in defining the social world for the individual. at a larger scale, the movement towards mass society creates the requisite conditions for totalitarianism by increasing the isolation of the individual by instilling a singular and all-pervasive ideology in the interests of the dominant elite(s), and by monopolizing media channels and thereby eliminating all contending ideological options (see clarke, 1978). 120 the contribution of the frankfurt theorists to the development of this powerful argument comes through in two senses. firstly, it is evident in the concentration on the individual and the psychosocial, which points to the relation between the aesthetic studies of the frankfurt theorists and their investigations of american authoritarianism conductrd in the forties, where the relation between culture and politics was thought to be best understood in psychosocial terras. mass society theorists, however, took up only the psychosocial and dropped any connection between culture and politics, as well as any hint that culture was or could be politicized. secondly, their influence can be seen in the denial of any remaining mediating forces that might have survived the rubble of mass society's rise to prominence. a third major problem with mass society or mass culture theories is the moralism that underlies the arguments. on the left, mills and marcuse bemoaned the one-directional and one-din.ensional flow of information and appealed to social democracy, defining inequality of access to the means of communication as the central problematic, since it obstructs the free flow of ideas and violates libertarian notions about press freedom: ideas flow freely from the elite(s) to the masses and not vice versa, and therefore are not representative of the general population. accordingly, there is a need to 'democratize' the communication process such that libertarian ideals can be realized in practice. the assumptive principles of their position were thus libertarian, while their proposals were reformist. at the politico-ideological centre, wirth (1948), warner (1962), and others modified the essence of mass society theory in a more positive or optimistic light. the development of mass communications and the unproblcmatically concomitant emergence of 'mass society' were welcomed and thought to be required integrative 121 forces, vital to social cohesion. along with the development of mass communications came a newly democratized culture that permitted the greater participation of subordinate social groups in the 'common life' of society. equality of access to the means of communication was simply assumed. on the right, blumer (1951), van den haag (1957), howe (1957), and others decried the emergence of mass society and its cultural vulgarities. their works were tainted with a romantic, nostalgic yen for 'tranditional values', a sense of 'community spirit', and a return to the stability of the extended family (see clarke, 1978). mcquail (1969: 35) notes some of the consequences of the latter version: ... the sociology of mass communications has not prospered under the shadow of mass society theory. not only have inappropriate questions been fostered and alternative ones discouraged, but the very weight of intellectual and ideological force behind these theories has discouraged competitors, and forced opponents to appear in the light of apologists for an existing social order, for capitalism and commercial exploitation, for ugliness and incipient totalitarianism. the parallels with english 'cultural criticism' are apparent here and will become more apparent through the course of later discussion. in the united states, it meant that much of the evidence for a new 'mass society' was based on the mass production of media commodities, notably radio, televesion, and film, which in turn fed the distinctively american brand of 'media sociology'. to understand how this particular specialized discipline took shape historically, we need to consider how the rise of a new 'mass culture' came to be ascribed. it was first necessary to ignore the historical prerequisites for the emergence of a 'popular' culture, and the economic changes that contributed to the growth of the middle class and the spread of literacy, each of which in turn presaged the creation of a truly 'mass' audience (see also bigsby, 1976). audience size was assumed to be the contingent, and, 122 just as the popular literature of the 19th century presupposed a literate public, so the media of the 20th seemed to require for their viability (and profitability) the capacity to satisfy the desires of a large and seemingly homogeneous audience. the new media of 'mass' communication became coterminous with 'mass' or popular culture. it is easy to see how this superficial account led, in the 'sociology of mass communications', to a narrowed concentration en audience studies and content analyses, to 'uses and gratifications' 4 research and 'effects' studies, many of which took their direction troir. lasswell's famous dictum: 'who says what, in which channel, to whon, with what effects?'. otto larsen complained in 1964 that this research "tended to viev persons as 'targets' of communications impact rather than as part of a total communication process" (1964: 368 569). most of the work fitted well within the tradition of post-war u.s. empiricism. by their very nature, therefore, these studies necessarily contributed little to a worthwhile or meaningful understanding of communication , and even less to the understanding of culture. canada, innis, and mcluhan innis' early analyses of the staples industries led, in his later years, to a special interest in the historical development of communications, and to the production of two major works, empire and ccr-.i.-'.icatior.s (1950) and the bias of communication (1951). while his commitment to 'technological determinism 1 is still arguable, it is plain in his hork on the communications industries that the developing complexities of communications technology were seen as central to understanding communications and to technological innovations in non-media industries. the predominance of the new 'mass' means of communication over 'pre-rrinting' 125 media (e.g. clay, papyrus, parchment) 3nd the decline of the oral tradition were both important elements in shaping potentially emergent forms of social organization. in other words, the types of media dominant ly featured in a society, once wholly developed, could be expected to determine the type and quality of human associations characteristic of a period. innis also argued that any given medium of communication is biased in terms of either time or space, and tends to 'bias' social organization by encouraging the emergence of particular types of institutions to the exclusion of others, and by imposing on these institutions a particular form of organization. 'space-biased' media, for example, are, according to innis, causal in the growth of the state, the military, and decentralized and expansionist institutions, whereas 'time-biased' media facilitate the growth of religion, of hierarchical forms of organization, and of contractionist institutions. thus for innis, it is the nature of the medium of communication (oral versus written, time-biased versus spacebiased) that determines the nature of social organization; a unique yet unverifiable premise that runs contrary to the bulk of sociological knowledge regarding the growth of particular forms of social organization. moreover, it would be difficult to make the claim that the argur.ent amounts to a distinctive moment in the development of cultural theory per se . since innis' concerns were largely limited to the development of a macro-theory of the general historical implications of 'landmark' innovations in communications technology. following very closely in innis' footsteps (if not treading directly on his toes) , mcl.uhan also stressed the nature of the mcdiuf as opposed to its content or the organization of production, and like innis, placed considerable emphasis on technological developments in the communication industries. however, in mcluhan's case, the effects of the medium were directly related to sensory organization, perception, and thought, rather than to social organization and culture. it seems pointless to fully elaborate mcluhan's notions in the context of this discussion. the utility of his formulations is limited for the same reasons that those of innis contribute little to the formation of a worthwhile theory of culture. furthermore, mcluhan's position is not at all internallyconsistent and has fluctuated considerably with time; more recently, his musings have included a fear of the forthcoming 'homogenization' of 8 the masses, which smacks of mass society theory and contradicts, in some very essential ways, his earlier arguments. u.k. developments : the foundations of 'cultural studies' a very different sequence of developments characterizes the field of cultural theory in european, especially british, social thought. the differences are exemplified in the work of the birmingham centre for contemporary cultural studies, work that will be referred to here as the 9 'cultural studies' approach. since, in large measure, the material represents both a culmination and a configuration of all past' theoretical legacies, it will be useful to outline the traditions out of which cultural studies emerged, and the succession of later 'influences' that penetrated their work, none of which (and this should be borne in mind) qualify as rigorously marxist approaches. at least five identifiable 'bodies of influence' account for the direction of the work: (1) the early english 'culture critics' (e.g. arnold and leavis) ; (2) hoggart, williams, and works of the 1950s; (3) at around the same time, another crucial initiative in the formation of cultural studies, thompson's 12s the making of the english working class , and the significance of cultural histories; (4) the later impact of the work of three neo-marxist theorists (althusser, gramsci , and poulantzas) ; and (5) structuralism and semiotics. the latter struck the centre in two successive waves: the first drew largely from the work of levi-strauss and barthes , and the second, more currently fashionable, takes its cues from lacan, kristeva, derrida, and others in france (now dubbed the 'post-structuralists'). the early influences of the english 'culture critics' (arnold, leavis, hoggart and williams) will be briefly traced, prior to a discussion of the development of the birmingham centre work itself. fi) arnold, leavis, and the 'culture critics' first, we need to look back a considerable historical distance to the origins of debate about popular culture (see burke, 1978, for a richly detailed analysis of the 'discovery' of popular culture in early capitalist europe). debates about popular culture, and notions abcut what it is, trace to early responses to the commercialization of culture in the first phase of european capitalism. the debate gathered r.orentum during the 19th century, and was spearheaded by literary critics and 'men of letters'. one of the most influential of the 19th century sources was matthew arnold's culture and anarchy , originally published in 1869. significantly, arnold emerged out of a tradition of literary criticism, was a poet and literary critic, held posts at oxford, and so forth. much of arnold's now classic formulations about culture grew out of his own disenchantment with the increasingly apparent implications of "the new industrial order', circa 1850. "i see", he wrote in 1848, "a wave of more than american vulgarity, moral, intellectual, and social, preparing to break over us ..." (cited in arnold, 1938). arnold's calls for the 126 establishment of formalized education under the wing of the state were intended to sophisticate the uncivilized masses made newly vulnerable to cultural deterioration, and parallel those of egerton ryerson in canada. culture, and especially the indoctrination of the new industrial working class into bourgeois culture, was to arnold the means to secure order, to inject self-discipline, and, in his words, "to do away with classes (read 'class-based cultures')" (1938: 70). culture was to occupy the new leisure time afforded to the working class through the arrival of industrialization and the mechanization of factory production. the state was to be cast in the role of cultural guardian, and, not unrelatedly, guardian of the new social order: we have not the notion, so familiar on the continent and to antiquity, of the state the nation in its collective and corporate character, entrusted with stringent powers for the general advantage, and controlling individual wills in the name of an interest wider than that of individuals (1938: 75; original emphasis). sometime later, once the full sway of industrialization was solidly in place, and it became clear that arnold's proposals for the administration of culture (and hence the containment of class conflict) through the state were insufficient, literary critics like t.s. eliot and.f.r. leavis -reflected on the cultural changes that had accompanied industrialization and were highly critical of both, more loudly of the former. their work features the same nostalgic longings for a pre-industrial , non-capitalist society that preoccupied howe and other american critics in the 1950s; in both cases, these sentiments provided the (weak) basis for a critique of industrial capitalism. the english critics held little stock in the capacity of the bourgeoisie to overcome the "pallid, mechanical, lifedenying civilization" that seemed part of the industrialization package (see swingewood, 1977: 2-10). 127 eliot's notes towards a definition of culture (1962) is exemplary. here eliot espoused the view that since culture is inevitably stratified, it ought to be stratified according to "a continuous gradation of cultural levels" (1962: passim). the concept of culture was organic, i.e. the culture of every individual flows from his/her membership of specific groups and classes, which in turn depend for their culture on the whole social order; culture is, therefore, a way of life and all societies witness some form of common culture. each national culture contains a variety of local cultures which therefore ensure unity and diversity within the whole. nevertheless, working class institutions and ideals, above all socialist ideals, must be assimilated by the dominant culture. this eliot made very clear. leavis, in mass civilization and minority culture , written in 1930, accepted that "culture was at a crisis" and blamed mechanization for destroying a genuine "common culture" with widely shared moral assumptions. like eliot, leavis stressed the importance of tradition in the life of a culture and its basis in the "organic community". he rued the demise of some pre-industrial , conflict-free period, the "old england" where work was meaningful and workers "could, without a sense of oppression, bear with long hours and low pay" (1930: 3-5); see also leavis and thompson, 1942: 68-91). in light of leavis' concern with folk culture, with a common culture that includes the everyday experience of common peorlc within a morally binding community, it is possible to see his legacy to the later concerns of cultural studies. it is also possible to see the theoretical links between leavis' 'critique of capitalism' and the postwar american 'critique of mass society'. williams argues, however, that leavis' concern with folk culture idealizes feudal, not modern, social relations and attempts to "attach humane feelings to pre-capitalist culture, whereas the historical reality 128 was of a hard and brutal world dominated by illiteracy, superstition, servility, squalor, and poverty" (1975: 48-51; see also bigsby, 1976: 16). williams' own critique of mass society theory and other bourgeois sociologies is most recently set forth in marxism and literature (1977), where he argues that the bourgeois concept of 'mass communications' and the related radical concept of 'mass manipulation' both need to be re-worked, if not completely replaced with terms that more cogently specify the movement of hegemony. it is suggested that the concept of the 'mass' has served to merely replace and neutralize the specificity of class structures, while the preoccupation with 'manipulation' has stifled any understanding of the phases of social consciousness that "correspond to real social situations and relations" (1977: 136-137). attention now turns briefly to the earlier work of williams himself and to one other equally important figure in the formation of the new cultural studies: richard hoggart. (ii) hoggart, williams, and the 1950s the importance of the literary criticism tradition carries through to the work of hoggart, which continued that "certain studied romanticism" (bigsby, 1976: 24) of the english literary approach. hoggart. replaced the conservative nostalgia of arnold and his descendants with a liberal nostalgia; although, like leavis, hoggart argued that a standardized mass culture had overtaken a fractured "urban culture of the people". to hoggart, working class culture (and he freely made this association) is precisely the same urban local culture of tightly knit communities, where myth, ritual, superstition, fatalism, and short-term hedonism occupy positions of centrality in everyday life. hoggart' s approach to culture is highly selective, impressionistic, and divorces the working class from its position within the division of labour and its place in production 129 relations. we might also note the absence of any discussion about the role of ideology in the configuration of popular consciousness. the concept of culture is static and passive, and denies culture its active, historical character. culture is reduced to a series or list of adaptive mechanisms adopted by the working class to ward off the alienation of urban capitalist life. moreover, the analysis in the uses of literacy (1957) deals strictly with superficial aspects of working class existence and is heavily imbued with hoggart's own romantic reminiscences of his working class youth. unlike hoggart , raymond williams (the early culture and society williams) offers a more radical approach, yet he still follows leavis and eliot and defines culture as an organic, co-operative, and collaborative activity. to williams, "culture is ordinary" and working class culture is "a basic collective idea, and the institutions, manners, habits of thought and intentions which proceed from this" (1958: 313-314). like leavis, this early williams argues explicitly against marxist interpretations when he suggests that working class institutions contribute to social growth through their contributions to the development of a cor.-.on culture. needless to say, this proposition eliminates all contradiction and conflict, and divests culture of any role in class domination. there is no theorization about cultures in conflict with each other, only "a destructured and static model (where) culture is defined in terms of meanings" (swingewood, 1977: 43). furthermore, culture obviously cannot be reduced to (or summed up in) a directory listing of habits, customs, and rituals. if culture is to be understood as a way of life, then it must indeed be understood, in williams* widelysubscribed phrase, as a whole way of life, and not merely a way of "coping with capitalism". 130 above all, culture needs to be understood inside a historical account of class struggle and explained vis-a-vis class interests, through the historical development of classes and class fractions. some evidence that williams has now come to recognize this inadequacy appears in marxism and literature where he attempts to sketch out the direction of his comparatively recent "embrace" of marxism for a "marxist cultural sociology" that would be "recognizable, in its simplest outlines, in studies of different types of institution and formation in cultural production and distribution, and in the linking of these within whole social material processes" (1977: 138). nevertheless, williams' embrace of marxism has yet to come full circle: a more faithfully marxist analysis should not feel it necessary to 'link' culture with material processes — it should start with the realization that culture is, itself, a material process. (iii) stuart hall, the birmingham centre, and 'cultural studies ' the importance of hoggart and the early williams to the work of the birmingham centre cannot be underestimated. sparks (1977), in fact, starts with hoggart and williams and takes their legacy as prime to the early and later centre work. cultural studies is usually associated with the work of the centre at birmingham (established in 1964) , although the late 1970s saw its influence blossom rapidly outward to what is now a whole network of centres (within britain and without) that follow or attempt to follow the approach. the kind of 'cultural studies' that came to be practiced at the birmingham centre was very much an outgrowth of the english tradition of literary criticism (tellingly enough, the centre was orignially subsumed within the department of english literature at birmingham university) and, in many ways, it still has not managed to get beyond the literary and the textual. sparks even suggests that 151 "cultural studies took over the total project of literary criticism" (1977: 18) with one crucial qualification; namely, the way in which the old opposition of high and low culture was overturned and now understood. while the early conceptualizations of culture remained largely intact, the reverence of arnold, leavis, et al . for bourgeois culture was supplanted with a new reverence for working class culture (heavily inspired by hoggart) that amounts to a kind of perverse elitism. otherwise, as sparks observes, there is not a great deal to distinguish the cultural conceptions of the centre and those of (classical) english literary criticism. one of the decisive developments at work was a rejection of oncedominant aesthetic definitions of culture (e.g. the 'sweetness and light' that constituted arnold's vision) and a movement towards anthropological conceptions, with a new focus on the community, especially the urban working class community, as the place where culture is practiced or 'lived' as a relation (note the althusserian reference) . the model represented in arnold and other liberal versions began with a sharp separation between •work' and 'culture', thereby discarding determination at the outset, and substituting the vague, empty, and non-contradictory notion of 'commodity'. according to sparks (1977: 18-22): that false resolution ... was in fact taken over wholesale by cultural studies. within that fundamental separation the conception of culture was once again reified to exclude any reference to social antagonism ... the ground was well prepared for a marxism which systematically evaded the squalid concerns of political parties, trade unions, and all the rest of the baggage of marxist orthodoxy, and which elevated debates on culture, epistemology, etc., to the centre of theoretical concern. similarly, as sparks argues, the centre's so-called 'encounter with marxism' (and this description seems appropriate) is highly problematic. at the surface level, it is evident in the rather marked changes in the 132 nature of the work produced at the centre throughout the late 60s and 70s (it's possible to trace these changes through the successive issues of the working papers in cultural studies , the centre's journal), whereas at a more fundamental level the transformation to a full-fledged legitimate marxism is still incomplete. indeed, one might well argue that such a total transformation can never be realized, that it was stymied at the start by the historical and epistemological traps that the centre inherited from literary criticism. this is not to say that cultural studies did not have its own very noble beginnings and intentions. take, for exar.ple, hall's early statement of the centre's objectives, part of the introduction to the first issue of the working papers : "it has been one aim of the centre to rescue the concept of "culture" itself from its reified form" (1971: 6). hall enlists the aid of williams to set in motion this "de-reification", enumerating williams' three meanings outlined in the long revolution (1965). the discussion is worth quoting at scr.c length, since it represents one of the few clear and precise statements of the centre's original (and, some would argue, still current) conceptualization of what culture is and where it is to be found: culture, (williams) suggested, can refer to 'the description , in lives and works, of those values which can be seen to compose a timeless order, or to have permanent reference to the universal human condition'; it can refer to the 'body of intellectual and imaginative work in which, in a detailed way, human thought and experience are variously recorded'; or it can refer to the 'description of a particular way of life, which expresses certain meanings and values, not only in art and learning but also in institutions and ordinary behaviour'. our own approach, while drawing on all three of those definitions, adheres most closely to the third. from this perspective, culture is the way social life is experienced and handled, the meanings and values which inform human action, which are embodied in and mediate social relationships, political life, etc. (1971: 6). this is all well and good, as it stands. it is quite another thing, however, to go on to argue, in the next breath, that this conceptualization "returns 133 culture to its root in the soil of specific historical and social situations (and) restores the dimension of meaning and praxis to the sphere of human action" (1971: 6). the meaning of culture that hall identified and adopts simply does not stand up to the grand claims of his next statement. there is a logical (or illogical) leap in the argument, one that carried disastrous results for the way that culture came to be approached through the centre's subsequent work, and one that facilitated their (false) claim to a marxist analysis of culture. the falsity of their claim can be at least partially understood through a consideration of the changed (and rapidly changing) politicopractical position of centre members, and more generally, of the dislocation of the intellectual through the course of the accelerated rationalization of british higher education during the 1960s and onward. no discussion here could do full justice to the complexities of these development:: or their implications for the state of british marxism. sparks' discussion of "the new mood of 1968" and " the creation of a new labour aristocracy structurally dependent upon the state machine" (19-77: 18-24), garnham's discussion of "the intellectualist fallacy" (1979), and anderson's broader discussion of changes within european marxism during the same period (1976), should all be consulted. briefly, it meant, in the work of centre members and others, a movement towards pure theoreticism (spelled out, for example, in the pages of the popular and extremely influential journal screen) ; a movement that signifies a very real obstruction to the development of a marxist cultural analysis (see later discussion). sparks concludes his account with the cleverly cryptic observation that "given this political and intellectual impasse the popularity of louis althusser in british was, one might say, overdetenmined" (1977: 22). 134 prior to the appropriation of althusser, however, there is a third influence that intervenes in the early centre work, namely edward thompson's 'cultural history' of the english working class (1963). it is particularly noticeable in their studies of "working class communities" (see, for example, lidia curtis et al., 1973), and was concretized in the formation of the "cultural history" sub-group during the mid-seventies. this work, too, started out with worthwhile intentions. there was the initial rejection of the abstract, ahistorical use of the word "culture" in the singular (since, among other problems, it implied some non-existent culture -in -general) and an attempt to give culture, or rather cultures^, "a more concrete historical reference" (cccs, 1976-78: 5-6). one such project, for example, detailed the evolution of post-war youth sub-cultures and was subsequently published in the form of resistance through rituals (hall and jefferson, 1976). curiously, though, the work reads more like the approacn of thompson in the making of the english working class (1963), where 'culture* (not 'cultures') is subjected to historical investigation, and where culture was viewed rather idealistically and class itself was said to happen "when some men, as a result of common experiences, feel and articulate the identity of their interests" (see the important preface, 1963: 9; emphasis added). while it is rightful to recognize that "a historical perspective lends a necessary specificity to the study of cultures" (cccs, 1976-78: 6), it is not enough to therefore pose "questions of cultural power and hegemony, of domination and subordination through the exercise of cultural power, and the transmission of cultural skills and competence" (cccs, 1976-78: 6-7). there is far more to the potency of bourgeois hegemony than simply things cultural, which points to their basic misappropriation of gramsci's writings (highlighted in their discussion 135 of the prison notebooks : see hall, lumley, fi mclennan, 1977). this type of approach to the study of cither culture or cultures necessarily elevates the object of analysis to the level of concerns about ideology and consciousness, and severs these concerns from things economic and broadly political; it consequently poses a serious contradiction between intent and result in the work of the centre. one can look more recently, for example, to richard johnson's comparative study of the traditions represented by the works of thompson and althusser, where johnson admits that "thompson's sole and explicit criterion for the existence of class concerns forms of consciousness and collective action or organization: in the making class is seen as a wholly political and cultural category" (1979: 65) and yet he still goes on, in conclusion, to "insist on the need to retain culture ideology as a couplet, where culture is understood as a ground or result of the work of ideologies" (1979: 75; emphasis added). while it is perhaps unfair to rob this conclusion of its context in the text of the article, it is nevertheless lucidly illustrative of what remains a fundamentally non-materialist conceptualization of culture in the work of the birmingham centre. a fourth and later influence in the development of cultural studies marks a strong attraction to work carried out in france and elsewhere on the continent. of the three neo-marxist thinkers (althusser, cramsci, and poulantzas) whose work touched off and accented the centre's concern about ideology theories (see, for example, working papers in cultural studies 10, 1977 and the more widely distributed version, on ideology , 1978), althusser's work, especially the "ideology and ideological state 12 apparatuses" or 'isas essay', occupied the most central place. importantly, the interest in althusser occurred not long after thompson's work had left its mark, and it is revealing to consider the similar 136 origins and motives of the two writers. both althusser and thompson set out to establish positions that would stand firmly opposed to stalinist and exonomistic tendencies in marxist work, both formulated their early arguments during a period of cold war hostility, and both attempted to transcend or evade that hostility by developing (in very different ways, of course) marxist work on non-economic questions (see johnson, 1979: 57ff). this last commonality is absolutely vital, for it came to be true, tragically, that these works set the direction for most subsequent work on culture and ideology. at this circumstantial moment in european intellectual history the concerns of at least the next decade were firmly grounded, even though the pressing need to polemicize against stalinist tendencies had long since been removed. somehow, through the course of later developments in cultural theory, the (ordinarily crucial) concern with the economic was never re-inserted into its proper place, and soon fell into a state of serious neglect. without engaging impractically in a full-scale treatise on the relation between althusserian structuralism and new currents in british marxism, it is at least possible to briefly summarize some of the most commonly identified weaknesses to be found in althusser's work on ideology. the usual complaints include the functionalist charges (particularly with respect to his discussion of the system-functions of the isas) , the internal inconsistencies, the too ominpotent role that is accorded to the state, and, notably, the over-emphasis on reproduction. a najor problem regarding the isas essay in particular is that, although subtitled "notes towards an investigation" and including althusser's own admission that "we are advancing in still poorly explored domains" (1971: 269), this single, crude and abbreviated 'exploratory' discussion has been appropriated as a fullyfledged 'theory of ideology'. not only 137 does althusser fail to provide a comprehensive, adequate or even workable theory of ideology, or of the state (although it may be unfair to assess his work against this misread intention), his 'notes' about the state and about ideology, taken together, contain some serious and by now wellacknowledged faults. sumner (1979) makes the point that the one-sided concept of ideological reflection has left a persistent perception of ideological transmission from above and only from above, such that, in order to proceed with his argument for the role of the state as the agent of ideological domination, althusser is compelled to deny the existence of contradictions or practices that might give rise to non-ruling class ideologies, which traps him inside a non-dialectical analysis. only later does althusser realize that the emergence of the isas and the dominance of ruling class ideologies within them, is possible only through class struggle within the isas (e.g. within legal and educational institutions). however, through the artificial insertion of contradictions into the analysis, althusser reduces ideologies to class ideologies, and hence short-forms the rich and complex ensemble of ideological formations. no longer is it possible to discuss class fractions or class alliances and their subscription to contending ideologies, a relation that becomes lost to analysis forever. to sumner (see, in particular, 1979: 25-so, 101-130), althusscr's class reductionisra is a serious theoretical limitation: it precludes the understanding of ideological differences that divide or cut across classes, and this is especially problematic since, according to sumner, these intra-class rivalries and ideological struggles holj the rreatest political import for contemporary marxist analysis. all of these inadequacies, intrinsic to althusser's theoretical 'notes' about ideology, are uncritically overlooked and hence systematically 'reproduced' in the 138 birmingham work on cultures and ideologies. the last important point to note about the absorption of althusser into cultural studies, however, is that their uncritical (mis) appropriation effectively and solidly wedged the centre further into the trap of abstract theoreticism. there is always a danger, in general discussions like the present one, that a review of a given body of literature can appear to attribute a monolithic character to the material. this is in fact somewhat justified in the case of the centre's work, which is largely collaborative and rarely authored by a single individual, reflecting the organization of the centre as a uniquely democratic collective and its preference for co-operative, rather than competitive, intellectual activity. (indeed, outside observers often comment on its 'cultlike 1 operation). in this sense, charges of theoreticism can be levelled at more than just this or that 'tendency' in the studies of one or more individuals. mention should be maae, however, of some peripheral and 'exiled' birminghar thinkers who do_ manage to escape the theoreticist trap. paul willis and dave morley exemplify the few who pursue more substantive questions: the relation between formalized education, cultural production, and the reproduction of labour power in willis' case (1977), and the stratification of audience readings in morley' s case (1975, 1980). willis, for example, acknowledges that trade unions are "by far the most important working lcass institution", and sparks notes that this acknowledgement alone "marks an important advance for an institution which, while dedicated to the study of working class culture has not, as yet , produced any major study, either theoretical or empirical, of the trade union movement" (1977: 27-28). regardless, sparks holds out little hope for an approach that disregards the contradictory nature of these sane working class institutions: "if it is agreed that the culture we are 139 studying is that of a subordinate class, and that this subordination is something which can be ended, then it follows that a great deal of contemporary working class culture is an historically transient formation" (1977: 28). one of the problems that rendered the birmingham and screen work openly susceptible to charges of theoreticism was its operation in a field traditionally weak in one important sense. cultural studies was, for some time during its formative period, an 'approach' without a methodology. literary criticism could offer little on that score, and so for its methodological impetus the centre turned once more to the continent and to european structuralism and semiotics, the fifth and latest influence that directs their work. this move, it can be argued, did little more than complicate or add to the existing problems of method. again, it is not possible to demonstrate the full consequences within the limits of this discussion; only a few illustrative points can be made. murdock and golding (e.g. 1977, 1978, 1979, 1980), sumner (1979: 131-203), and others have carried out sustained critiques of the methodological faults endemic to 'immanent structural' or semiotic analysis. the former, for example, concede that the approach has opened wide the field of potential objects of analysis to include art, literature, religion, cosmetic fashions, bodily gestures, and many other everyday symbolic forms: "in a field where people are still apt to regard contemporary culture as more or less synonymous with television programming, this contextualization represents a considerable gain in breadth" (1978: 348). problems arise, however, when one attempts to unravel the significance of these symbolic forms through the use of immanent strucutral analysis. murdock and colding argue that the epistemological and 140 methodological principles of the approach irrevocably lead to "a highly asymmetric analysis in which an elaborate anatomy of symbolic forms sits alongside a schematic and incomplete account of social processes" (1978: 349). in other words, there are degrees of contextualization, and cultural studies, however ambitious in its range, has not achieved the greatest degree that it might. to some, this potential is unrealizable: murdock and golding, operating within a more orthodox perspective, see no way out, and conclude that "textual and sociological analyses are rooted in fundamentally opposed approaches to the study of culture and ... eventually a choice must be made between the two" (1978: 351). the later, and very different, williams seems to opt for the latter. in a landmark new left review article (1973) that in many ways marks the point of his rupture with earlier theoretical affiliations, williams asserts that "we have to break from the notion of isolating the object and then discovering its components. on the contrary, we have to discover the nature of a practice and then its conditions" (1973: 16). and, in a 1974 work, television: technology and cultural form, williams reiterates the need for a greater degree of contextualization: to say that television is now a factor in socialization,, or that its controllers and communicators are exercising a particular social function, is to say very little until the forms of the society which determine any particular socialization and which allocate the function of control and communication have been precisely specified (1974: 120; emphasis added) . critiques of immanent structural or semiotic analysis most often cite the following major weakenesses of the method: (1) its insistence on the immanent revelations of cultural texts; (2) its inductive epistemological principles; (3) its impressionistic, 'subjective', and inferential nature; (4) its unreplicable (and hence unverifiable) character; (5) its too weighted reliance on the ingenuity of the 141 individual analyst; and (6) its necessary ahistoricism. sumner, however, argues that these weakenesses are not immutable, and attempts to salvage the more worthy traits of the approach through his proposals for a "historical materialist semiology" (1979: 207-245). although still tentative and cumbersome (see the four 'approximations' and their attendant empirical contingents, 1979: 238-245), sumner's approach contrasts sharply with the enthusiastic birmingham adoption of the study of the text for the sake of the text. indeed, the new currency of debates about authorship represents an alarming 'sign' of further and future over-subscriptions to french structuralism, and especially the new 'post-structuralism' (represented by derrida, kristeva, et^ al_. ) , which is content not only to decompose a text with blind disregard to its material sources and conditions, but to decompose the text for the sake of analysis itself, and not for the sake of revealing its politico-ideological implications. this is tantamount to "deconstruct ion for the hell of it", as norman snider so pointedly expressed it in, significantly, a recent edition of his 'trends' column (globe 6 mail , 20 september, 1980). even those who still perceive their work as part of and contributory to larger politico-practical objectives, still limit their analytical range to the text itself in their explanations (if included) of social process. murdock and golding rightfully question the capacity of social texts to reveal all that there is to cultural production and reproduction. their damning critique of semiotics suggests that what is at stake here is much more than a problem of method: ... it is not just a question of devising more adequate modes of textual analysis and applying them to a comprehensive range of media output ... there is a fundamental methodological difficulty in approaching social and structural relations 142 through the analysis of texts. however well conceived and executed, textual readings remain a variety of content analysis and as such they suffer from the familiar but intractable problem of inference. it is one thing to argue that all cultural forms contain traces of the relations of production underlying their construction, and of the structural relations which surround them. it is quite another to go on to argue that an analysis of form can deliver an adequate and satisfactory account of these sets of relations and of the determinations they exert on the production process. they can't. in our view the sociology of culture and communication has been seriously incapacitated by the tendency of over-privilege texts as objects of analysis (1979: 206-207; emphasis added). what is most alarming about the new 'trend* towards post-structuralist semiotics is that it represents a fundamental inversion of the principles of historical materialism, and yet it operates under the guise of 'marxist' cultural theory. rather than refer to these developments as 'neo-' or even 'post-' marxism, we might more properly identify the latest theoretical fashions as a kind of anti -marxism. who better to illustrate this point than marx himself: it is, in reality, much easier to discover by analysis the earthly core of the misty creations of religion, than, conversely, it is to develop from the actual relations of life the corresponding celestialized forms of those relations. the latter method is the only materialistic, and therefore the only scientific one (1967: 352n) . conclusions: towards a materialist analysis of culture despite the promise of the new conception of culture as 'a whole way of life', culture is still treated as a realm apart, both by literary-structural theorists and by more orthodox thinkers. or. one side, traditional notions have been extended to encompass a wide range of cultural commodities and symbolic forms; on the other, culture is still separated from work and reduced, in essence, to life styles and not life ways . both traditions have contributed to the further reificaticn of the concept, abstracted it from the web of social relations, ir.l transformed it into a monolithic notion of not just 'culture as a whole' but 'culture as a whole realm of social life' and therefore, somehow, separable 143 from other material productions. meanwhile, mass society theorists (including "culture industry' theorists) start with a moralistic observation that 'culture' is disintegrating, and proceed to centre entirely on their abstract, ungrounded notion of culture rather than on the specific determinations and historical configurations of cultures within capitalist. the result is "a crude "consumptionist" theory of culture in which subjective judgement and moral evaluation dominate to the exclusion of scientific analysis" (swingewood, 1977: xi). this underlines even more the need to locate culture by first looking towards production , and by conceptualizing culture itself as first and foremost a material production. in contrast, all of the approaches discussed start out with either a firm rejection of exasperation with, or sheer desertion of, the principles of materialist analysis, and some, as we have seen, arrive at either an implicitly anti-marxist or (at best) quasi-marxist stance. such categorizations, and the general profusion of lables that attempt to identify the various strands of thought, reflect the current state of theoretical confusion about culture. at least three critical and interrelated problems occupy the current debates: those of mediation, of agency, and of determination. the consequences of the first two of these have already been noted, and therefore greater attention must now be paid to the problem of determination itself. the conditions that led these problems to attain their acute significance for contemporary cultural theorists are suggested throughout the discussion. anderson (1976), however, more broadly contextualizes the developments. according to his account, the "organic unity of theorv and practice" realized in the generation of prc-wwi marxists suffered a serious rupture during the five decades between 1918 and 1968. the political forces that came into play following the first world war (e.g. 144 fascism and stalinism) served to sever the bond between theory and practice and to scatter and suppress certain key theorists like cramsci, korsch, and lukacs. from this point forward, the possibilities for a lively and dynamic exchange of marxist thought, one informed by concrete political practice, were seriously diminished. moreover, after 1920, most major theoretical works were produced in a context of political isolation and (often) defeatist despair, including: lukacs' history and class conscious ness (1923), written during his period of exile in austria; gramsci's notes, compiles during his imprisonment under mussolini's triumphant fascism; the early works of the frankfurt theorists, written under the conditions of german fascism; marcuse's eros and civilization (1954), produced in the era of mccarthyism in the united states; and sartre's critique of dialiectical reason (1960), which appeared following the gaullist coup of 1958. anderson concludes that "the hidden hallmark of western marxism as a whole is thus that it is a product of defeat" (1976: 42; original emphasis). one painful consequence of the impasse brought about by these conditions became "the studied silence of western marxism in those areas most central to the classical traditions of historical materialism" (1976: 44); notably, analysis of economic changes within the developing capitalist mode of production, of the significance of the growing state machine, and of the ongoing class struggles within capitalist societies. at the same time, the post-war capitalist economic boom, and with it the global consolidation of capital all around the industrialized world, signalled a new phase of capitalism that seemed to undermine the classical account of its inevitable decline, and posed instead a 'crisis' for marxist analysis. in light of these circumstances, the appearance of althusser's works during the 1960s, and their widespread influence, is 145 readily comprehensible. althusser's reformulations of the classic marxist precepts (e.g. the crucial concept of "structural causality" of a mode of production in reading capital , and the concept of a social totality "determined in the last instance" by one preponderant level within it, which in itself blew open the whole surge of functionalist attacks, and deservedly so) , undermined the already weakened vitality of classical political economy, and led to an inordinate amount of concentration on the study of superstructures , in which analyses of culture and ideology rose to unwarranted prominence. furthermore, there are those who argue (e.g. mrudock and golding, 1979) that ultimately the most dreadful implication of althusser's work was its final and definitive eradication of one of the core, distinguishing features of historical materialisir ; namely, the real and ever-present determination of the economic. the sole outstanding exception to these otherwise pervasive tendencies is represented in the work of one of the last great 'politically informed' marxist theorists: gramsci. it is particularly remarknble in that gramsci 's work also concentrated on the study of superstructures, yet "unlike any other theorist in western marxism he took the autonomv and efficacy of cultural superstructures as a political problem, to be explicitly theorized as such in its 'relationship to the maintenance or subversion of the social order" (anderson, 1976: 78; original emphasis). this is the critical difference, although popular misappropriations of his work have themselves 'subverted' the distinctiveness of his approach to culture, and the cryptic nature of his writings has obstructed a clear understanding of their theoretical significance. the construction of a comprehensive gramscian approach to the study of culture would no doubt be a massive, yet not impossible, project; it would need to take into acccint and piece together all of the observations about culture (and 146 ideology) dispersed throughout the voluminous prison notes. the project is made all the more massive by the recent availability of the first english translation of some of the early political writings (gransci, 14 1977, 1978). nevertheless, in order to fulfill the requirements of a materialist analysis of culture, we might usefully start with gramsci's seminal works. it is a tribute to his unique insights that gramsci, at a very early historical stage, recognized the dangers of and understood the developments behind the growth of idealist elements within marxist theory: the currents which have attempted combinations of the philosophy of praxis with idealist tendencies consist for the most part of 'pure' intellectuals, whereas the current which has constituted the orthodoxy consisted of intellectual personalities more markedly dedicated to practical activity and therefore more closely linked to the great popular mases (1971: 389). part of the explanation for this i^si^ht lies in gramsci'i frequent polemics against the idealism of croce , his chief opponent in the local italian debate. in a similar vein, gransci also recognized the overriding problem of determination, and insisted that "it is the problem of the relations between structure and superstructure which must be accurately posed and resolved if the forces which are active in the history of a particular period are to be correctly analyzed, and the relations between them determined" (1971: 177). with respect to this overriding problem, garnham (1979) has helpfully identified the roots of the debate about determination in his search for congruities between the work of screen and historical materialism. in the first place, the imbalanced concern with ideology and culture has placed traditional understandings of determination in doubt. ... the economic is determinant in certain historically specific ways, i.e. each one of us would literally starve 147 to death unless wc entered into this structure of economic relationships. the same cannot be said of many so-called superstructural activities which are in this sense, relatively autonomous, relatively matters of free choice (1979: 125). garnham argues that this straightforward distinction has been inflated beyond reason, and that this can be understood in terms of the relatively privileged position of intellectuals within modern relations of production; hence their susceptibility to confusions about determination. the argument suggests that, as a first step towards a materialist approach, we need to remove culture, or at least ideology, from its position of centrality in 'marxist' thought and work. it may mean, for example, looking for 'culture' in hitherto unlikely places, i.e. inside factories and offices and not just in working or middle class neighbourhoods, and making sense of the findings not with the dubious aid of althusserian 'theories', but with reference to substantive works like, for example, beynon's working for ford (1973) or thompson's research on the problems encountered in introducing the notion of regulated working hours in the early moments of industrialization (1967). a second source of the confusion about determination lies in the associated (and, some would argue, 'manufactured') problem of 'levels', brought on in part by althusser's re-reading of capital . in a valiant effort to "bring back the dialectic", garnham argues forcefully that the whole notion of levels is a false one. discussions of "levels of the social formation" tend to (incorrectly) specify "discrete areas of concrete social practice (e.g. the economic is material production and circulation, the ideological is concerned with ideas and cultural forms, the political concerned with political parties, the state and so on). on the contrary, levels are not actual social practices but analytically distinct perspectives upon concrete social phenomena which arc at one 148 and the same time economic, ideological, and political" (1079: 1 jo) . a third source of trouble traces to the widely pcrcicved limitations of the classic equation between ideology and false consciousness as well as the opposition between real relations and phenomenal foros , on the basis of which many cultural theorists instantly dismiss marx as a source of theoretical insight into the workings of ideology and culture. yet, as gamhara points out: all that historical materialism posits is that economic class positions produce one set of positions as an average or probabilistically, rather than another. it then sometimes goes on to argue that the gap precisely between the real and 'reality' or between economic relations and phenomenological forms makes possible a disjunction between the real interests and a false consciousness of those interests. it does not necessarily ... then make ideology merely 'the misleading phenomenal form of the real movement'. it claims that, because there is mediation (or relative autonomy or disjuncture or indeed whatever word or theoretical construct one uses to describe the manifestly obvious and anciently attested fact that there is a difference between the real and its representation) there is a possibility of misunderstanding. but it does depend . . . upon an assumption of the primacy and determinacy of the real ... marx certainly, and i believe, marxism, rests upon the ultimate primacy of the real (1979: 126-127). granham's defense is quoted at length here, since it marks a rare type of intervention into the current debates of marxist cultural theory. on a more optimistic note, there is some recent evidence that oppositions of this nature are on the increase (see, for example, the debate between coward (1979), and chambers et_ al_. (1979) . in the interests of a maturing materialist approach to the study of culture, such interventions must be heartily welcomed. 149 notf.s 1. the unique position of walter benjamin vis-a-vis other menbers of the institute for social research is still a subject of debate (see later discussion) , and hence the theoretical cohesion suggested by the phrase 'the frankfurt school' renders its usage somewhat inappropriate. 2. horkheimer died in 1973. the quotation derives from a letter written to martin jay in 1971, subsequently published as the forward to jay's account of the institute (1973). 3. a problematic feature of mass society theory is this limited attention to these three media and its relative neglect of other significant culture industries and cultural forms (literature, drama, newspapers, magazines, theatre, etc.). 4. the material imperatives that determined the direction of much american 'mass communications' research are by now well known. the needs of the u.s. private radio industry for some knowledge of its broadcast markets and the requirements of war-time propaganda each figured within the development of the dominant modes of media empiricism. several leading figures within this tradition were directly employed by private audience research agencies or private research foundations linked to the media industries. in addition, hovland directed the research branch of the u.s. army's information and education division (see golding and murdock , 1978). 5. innis' theory is introduced in empire and communications (19") and further developed in the bias of communication (1951). related works include ch anging concepts of tire (toronto: university of toronto press, 1952) and the strategy of culture (toronto: university of toronto press, 1952). 6. see carey (1968) for evidence that mcluhan's 'borrowings' i'ror. innis were more than substantial, verging on sheer plagiarisr. 7. their limited utility is illustrated in the fact that few studies have followed or attempted to develop the tradition further. a notable exception is carpenter's oh, htiat a blow that phantom cave me ! (1976). his idle musings, however fascinating to read, demonstrate the impressionistic and fundamentally non-analytical nature of mcluhan's formulations about culture. 8. keynote address, 11th annual conference of the canadian association for american studies, waterloo, ontario, .22-25 october 19". 9. the phrase 'cultural studies' is preferred to 'cultural mnrxisr.' (as some refer to the approach), for reasons that will become apparent. iso 10. hoggart shared the anxieties and lived the contradictions of other british working class academics of the 1950s who moved upward through the academy during the post-war expansion of higher education, and, like the others, was compelled by a need to 'settle accounts' with his class origins. the uses of literacy should be read in this light. 11. it is indicative of 'the new williams' that statements like the following appear in the latest text: "it is in practice impossible to separate the development of the novel as a literary form fror. the highly specific economics of fiction publication" (1977: 137) -a far cry indeed from the young literary critic of the 1950s. 12. in a revealing admission, johnson notes that the isas essay "has been massively influential, defining, for many readers, the actual terrain of "materialism"" (1979: 58). 13. that thompson's motives in the production of making were largely polemical is disclosed in the following excerpt from a recent interview: "the making of the english working class undoubtedly arose from a two-sided theoretical polemic. on the one hand it could not have been written without the extremely firmly, intellectually very well-based, discipline of economic history ... it is a tradition largely contaminated with capitalist ideoiogy ... on the other hand it was in a sense a polemic against abbreviated economistic notations of marxism..." (1976: 4-5). 14. cavalcanti and piccone, however, have usefully culled some of the salient writings on culture from these early articles (see crar-;sci, 1975: 9-49). 151 references adorno, theodor w. 1967 prisms . samuel weber 6 shierry weber, trans. london: neville spearman. althusser, louis 1971 "ideology and ideological state apparatuses". lenin and philosophy and other essays , b. brewster, transt london : new left books. anderson, perry 1976 considerations on western marxism . london: new left books. arnold, matthew 1938 culture and anarchy , j. dover wilson, ed. , cambridge: cambridge university press (orig. 1869). benjamin, walter 1970 "the work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction". illuminations . london: cape (orig. 1939). beynon, huw 1973 working for ford . harmondsworth: penguin. bigsby, c.w.e. 1976 "the politics of popular culture". approaches to popular culture , c.w.e. bigsby, ed. london: edward arnold, 3-26. blumer, herbert 1951 "the mass, the public, and public opinion". new outlines of the principles of sociology , a.m. lee, ed. new york: barnes 6 noble. burke, peter 1978 popular culture in early modern europe . london: temple smith, carey, james w. 1978 "harold adams innis and marshall mcluhan". mcluhan: pro and con . raymond rosenthal, ed. harmondsworth: penguin, 270-308. carpenter, edmund 1976 oh, what a blow that phatom gave me ! frogmore: paladin. centre for contemporary cultural studies (cccs) 1978 on ideology. london: hutchinson. 1976-78 report . chambers, iain, et al. 1979 "marxism and culture". screen 21 (summer): 109-119. 152 clarke, dobra 1978 "the significance of mass media ownership for the process of ideological reproduction: the canadian case". m.a. thesis, department of sociology, mcmaster university. coward, rosalind 1979 "class, "culture", and the social formation". screen 22 (fall): 75-105. eliot, t.s. 1962 notes towards a definition of culture . london. garnhajn, nicholas 1979 "subjectivity, ideology, class, and historical materialism". screen 20 (spring) : 121-133. golding, peter and graham murdock 1979 "ideology and the mass media: the question of determination". ideology and cultural production , michele barrett £t a_l, ecs. london: croom helm, 198-224. ]978 "theories of communication and theories of society". communication research 5 (july) : 339-356. gramsci, antonio 1975 history, philosophy, and culture in the young gransci , pedro cavalcanti and paul riccone, eds. saint louis: telos press. 1977 selections from political writings (1910-1920), john "ithews , trans., quintin hoare, ed. new york: international publishers 1978 selections from political writings (1921-1926). quintin hoare, trans, and ed. new york: international publishers. 1971 selections from the prison notebooks of antonio crn.-sci, quintin hoare and geoffrey nowell smith, trans, and eds. new york: international publishers. hall, stuart 1971 "introduction". working papers in cultural studies 1: 5-7. 1976 and tony jefferson, eds. resistance through rituals . london: hutchinson, (orig. working tapers in cultural studies 7/s, 1975). 1978 bob lumley, and gregor mclennan. "politics and ideology: gramsci". on ideology (cccs) . london: hutchinson, 43-76. 155 hoggart , richard 1957 the uses of literacy . london: chatto g windus. howe, irving 1957 "notes on mass culture". mass culture: the popular arts in america . bernard rosenberg and david manning white, eds. new york: free press, 496-503. innis, harold adams 1972 empire and communications . toronto: university of toronto press, (orig. 1950). 1951 the bias of communication . toronto: university of toronto press. jay, martin 1973 the dialectical imagination . boston: little, brown , 5 co. johnson, richard 1979 "histories of culture/theories of ideology". ideology and cultural production , michele barrett et al, eds. london: crooni helm, 49-77. klapper, joseph t. 1960 the effects of mass communication . new york: free press. larsen, otto 1964 "social effects of mass communication". handbook o:~ "odern sociology , r.e.l. faris, ed. chicago: university of chicago press. leavis, f. r. 1930 mass civilization and minority culture . cambridge: cambridge university press. 1933 and denys thompson. culture and environment . londcn: chatto 6 windus. lukacs , georg 197] history and class consciousness , rodney livingstone, trans. cambridge: mit press (orig. 1923). marcuse, herbert 1954 eros and civilization. boston: beacon press. 1964 one-dimensional man . boston: beacon press. marx, karl 1967 capita l , volume 1. new york:' international publishers. mcquail, denis 1969 towards a sociology of mass communication . london: colliermacmi llan. 154 miliband, ralph 1977 marxism and politics . oxford: oxford university press. 1969 the state in capitalist society . london: wcidenfckl ' nicolson. mills, c. wright 1956 the power elite . new york: oxford university press. morley, dave 1975 "reconceptuali-ing the media audience". university of birmingham: centre for contemporar; cultural studies stencilled occasional papers. 1980 "the television audience for nationwide" . prper prcse-.ted at the centre for mass communication research, university of leicester, february. murdock, graham and peter golding 1977 "capitalism, communication, and class relations". mass communication and society , james curran et al, eds. 'cr.don: edward arnold, 12-43. 1980 cultural capitalism: the political econony of mass communications . london: rout ledge f, kegan paul [forthconing 1981) peterson, t. 1965 the mass media and modern society . new york: holt, finehart, 5 winston. sallach, david i.. 1974 "class domination and ideological hegenon'". the sociological quarterly 15 (winter): 38-50. slater, phil 1974 "the aesthetic theory of the frankfurt school", koy-.-.r.v. papers in cultural studies 6, 172-211. snider, norman 1980 "how now structuralist criticism?". globe u mail , zc sertterbvr. sparks, colin 1977 "the evolution of cultural studies". screen educat:~:'. t2 (spring): 16-30. sumner, colin 1979 reading ideologies . london: academic tress. swingewood, alan 1977 the myth of mass culture . london: macmillan. therborn, goren 1970 "frankfurt marxism: a critique". new left re view i (september-october). 155 thompson, edward p. 1976 "an interview with e.p. thompson". radical history review 3 (fall). 1965 the making of the english working class . london : victor gollancz, (orig. 1963). 1967 "time, work-discipline, and industrial capitalism". past and present 38. van den haag, ernest 1957 "of happiness and despair we have no measure". vass culture : the popular arts in america , bernard rosenberg ar.d david manning white, eds. new york: free press, 504-556. warner, w.l. 1962 "mass media: a social and psychological analysis". american life . chicago: university of chicago press. williams, raymond 1973 "base and superstructure in marxist cultural theory". sew left review 82. 1958 culture and society 17s0-1950 . london: chatto s vindus, (see also 1963 penguin edition with postscript dated may 1p6" 1977 marxism and literature. london: oxford universif tress. 1974 television: technology and cultural form. london: fontana. 1965 the long revolution . harmondsworth: penguin. willis, paul 1977 learning to labour: how working class kids get workin g class jobs . london: saxon house. wirth, louis 1948 "consensus and mass communication". american soc i ological review 13: 1-15. 156 alternate routes a critical review editorial board: jim conley, joan st. laurent, eileen saunders alternate routes is an annual publication of graduate students in sociology and anthropology. manuscripts, subscriptions and communications should be addressed to: alternate routes department of sociology and anthropology carleton university ottawa* ontario, canada k1s 5b6 phone: 231-6634. the editorial board wishes to establish a genuine forum for the exchange of ideas. we welcome critical responses , commentaries or rejoinders, which we will endeavour to publish in subsequent issues. the editors gratefully acknowledge the financial assistance of the department of sociology and anthropology, carleton univere is chairperson, dennis forcese. we also wish to thank cruikshank for her administrative assistance. subscriptions : individuals and institutions: $2. 75. payable to alternate routes. copyright 1979, alternate routes, unless otherwise noted. alternate routes a critical review editorial board: jim conley, joan st. laurent, eileen saunders alternate routes is an annual publication of graduate students in sociology and anthropology. manuscripts, subscriptions and communications should be addressed to: alternate routes department of sociology and anthropology carleton university ottawa, ontario, canada k1s 5b6 phone: 231-6634. the editorial board wishes to establish a genuine forum for the exchange of ideas. we welcome critical responses, commentaries or rejoinders, which we will endeavour to publish in subsequent issues. the editors gratefully acknowledge the financial assistance of the department of sociology and anthropology, carleton university, and its chairperson, dennis foroese. we also wish to thank bev cruikshank for her administrative assistance. subscriptions : individuals and institutions: $2. ?s. make cheques payable to alternate routes. copyright 1979, alternate routes, unless otherwise noted. digitized by the internet archive in 2011 with funding from carleton university, department of sociology & anthropology http://www.archive.org/details/alternateroutesc03alte alternate routes a critical review vol. 3 1979 contents phil heiple 7 university of california, santa barbara the poxitios of probability ...1 gordon haas / carleton university claus offe and the capitalist state: a critique ...25 bonnie ward / queen's university the myth of autonomy in family farm production . . .49 sut jhally / university of victoria marxism and underdevelopment: the modes of production debate ...63 janice belkaoui / rosary college a critical assessment of media studies ...94 votes to contributors ...128 editorial statement alternate routes is a critical review of sociology and related disciplines. we strive to publish the critical work of graduate students which will inform, and be of interest to students and teachers of social science. in our view, sociologists must be critical, both of their own society and of the work of other social analysts. we seek, therefore, to publish work which challenges existing sociological and societal orthodoxies. to achieve this goal we require manuscripts. we encourage graduate students among our readers to submit essays, reviews, commentaries and rejoinders on a wide variety of subjects. we particularly welcome v^rk which treats some aspect of canadian society within the wider concerns of critical social science. isbn 0-7709-0061-5 john porter 1921 1979 the editors of alternate routed wish to acknowledge the contributions of the late john porter to carleton university, to canadian sociology, and to the academic community at large. his seminal work, the vertical mosaic (1965j, stands as a benchmark in the development of sociological analyses of canadian society, serving to encourage the continuing investigation of the nature of social inequality. while beet known for this book, dr. porter was also the author of numerous other works, including canadian social structure: a statistical profile, amd does money matter? (co-authored with marion porter and bernard bliehen). john porter will be keenly missed, as a scholar, as a member of the university community, and above all, for graduate students at carleton, as a teacher committed to his students and to their training as critical, skilled sociologists . the politics of probability phil heiple "statistics" was first used in the middle of the sixteenth century and related to matters concerning the state. statistics continued in this sense for the next two hundred years. these matters of state concern became more and more numerical and summary methods were used. these provided a framework for social policy and also played a rhetorical function of legitimation due to popular attitudes toward exact figures (kendall, 1972:196; clark, 1937:122-124). by the mid-seventeenth century, mathematicians, physicists, astronomers and other scientists adopted and advanced the summary methods of statistics. these advances were aided by the developing systems of rational accounting in use in business and by the philosophies of natural science developed by galileo, bacon, descartes, and newton (clark, 1937:79, 133-137; kendall, 1972:197). quantification was first being attempted as a form of social thought at this time. the general background was the rational spirit of rising capitalism and the increasing size of different countries which necessitated a more impersonal and abstract basis for public administration. specific attempts were related to concrete problems of refining the numerical bases of the new insurance systems and to the mercantilists' belief that population size was a crucial factor in the wealth and power of the state (douglas, 1971a:50; lazarsfeld, 1961:279). new economic conditions forced the new importance of recordskeeping for political assessment. changing modes of production led to prolonged depression and massive unemployment throughout europe. vagrancy laws and institutionalized houses of confinement were among the bureaucratic responses to these conditions (c.f., chambliss, 1964; foucault, 1965). these required systematic records as well as agencies charged with the execution of these tasks. this was the beginnings of the bureaucracies of official morality. the growing size and complexity of western societies created a need for some form of accountable information which could be legally and morally sanctioned as the basis for policy judgments (douglas, 1971b :51-52). the symbiosis of quantitative social thought with the analytical and calculating form of thought of the bourgeoisie had advanced by the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries to the point where social statisticians and official statistics helped promote a formal standardization of morality as justice and helped civil service and state interventionist power to grow and to become increasingly remote from the qualitative relations of a socially produced and understood world. this is compatible with what weber depicted as the rationalizing character of bureaucratic thought, which lukacs later depicted as fundamental to the process of capitalist reification. parallel with the late-nineteenth century transition from entrepreneurial capitalism to corporate capitalism and the administrative welfare state of the new deal, sociology in the united states abandoned early descriptive participant-observer methods (e.g. chicago school) in favor of survey methods and the analysis of official statistics. by the 1930's, sociological methods as represented by the increasing number of methods texts came to be synonymous with quantitative analysis (douglas, 1971a:55). articles in social science journals from 1895 to the present reveal an increasing use of quantification and statistical manipulation. snizek (1975:42—424) found that these methods tended to produce " a realist view of social reality, often associated with the fallacy of reification, ... one that focuses on group properties in hopes of discovering the structural laws that govern behavior" (1975:416). statistical reasoning's claim to validity in social analysis is that the calculus of probability adequately describes the relative likelihood of events occurring in the social world. or, as blalock (1960:509) negatively stated it: if probabilities are unknown, it will be impossible to make legitimate use of statistical inference. i am interpreting this to mean that probability theory is the philosophical (i.e., metaphysical) link between statistical measurement and the world of observables. this dichotomy is interesting. blalock (1960:19) himself evokes it in an anticipatory aside where he says, "this is a question of fact which is irrelevant to the question of whether or not there is a legitimate unit of measurement." to me, the irrelevant is relevant. my basic thesis is that methods and politics are inseparable because methods for social analysis always contain certain presuppositions about the nature of the social world. insofar as these presuppositions express or imply a concept or evaluation of social order, or an excuse or means to evaluate social order, they are metaphysical. these metaphysics are a metaphysics of normality. they delimit the scope of normal social relations and are therefore political in their implications for social life. antonio gramsci 's criticism of the law of large numbers illustrates this approach. in brief, the law of large numbers states that the larger the number of samples the greater the likelihood (probability) that their average will approximate the average of the population from which they were drawn. several times in the prison notebooks gramsci (1971:401, 412) mentions the usefulness of this concept for analysing the quantitative expressions of social phenomena. this is acceptable because it does not pretend to avoid selecting for specific characteristics of the sample. when dealing with human subjects, however, gramsci (1971:428-429) finds the law of large numbers (and the concept of statistical law generally) to be deeply flawed: but the fact has not been properly emphasized that statistical laws can be employed in the science and art of politics only so long as the great masses of the population remain (or at least are reputed to remain) essentially passive, in relation to the questions which interest historians and politicians. furthermore, the extension of statistics to the science and art of politics can have very serious consequences to the extent that it is adopted for working out future perspectives and programmes of action ... indeed in politics the assumption of the law of statistics as an essential law operating of necessity is not only a scientific error, but becomes a practical error in action ... it should be observed that political action tends precisely to rouse the masses from passivity, in other words to destroy the law of large numbers. gramsci is arguing that the law of large numbers contains an important presupposition about its unit of analysis. the presupposition is that the unit of analysis is a passive object. gramsci points out that the unit of analysis cannot be an active subject. it cannot be in a state of becoming i.e. , it cannot be in a state that is undergoing any kind of qualitative change. this is the metaphysic of normality for the law of large numbers. it delimits its units to static relations. even if stochastic measures are used, only quantitative changes are possible. in short, it systematically ignores the possibility of a revolutionary subject. gramsci did not attempt a study of probability theory to see if metaphysics of normality were only accidentally and occasionally present, or generally so. in the next several pages i will survey probability theory with a search for metaphysics in mind. first, let me delineate which issues in probability theory i will be addressing. three perspectives dominate modern probability theory: the "objective" or "frequentist" position, the "subjective" or "personalist" approach, and the "logical" theory of probability. putting aside the logical theory for a moment, the distinction between the objective and subjective theories can be posed by their different accounts of the relationship between the concept of probability and the nature of probable knowledge. according to the objectivist position, probability is an objective characteristic of a multi-leveled physical reality. probable knowledge is knowledge of one of those levels and is incomplete because of the incompleteness of our information. strict determinacy is assumed in the physical reality. statistical methods are used to bridge the gap between insufficient information and the strict determinacy of objective reality. the objectivist position is the predominant form of probability theory used in the social sciences. the less widely held subjectivist position holds that our knowledge of physical reality is inevitably limited in principle and that our knowledge is therefore only probably true. this is the interpretation of probability' predominant in orthodox quantum physics: the quantum level is the level of inseparability between the knower and the object known where the knower is nonetheless compelled to speak of the object as if it were not affected by the knower, which results in statements of only probable validity. statistical methods are employed to express the degree of certitude the knower attaches to these statements (suppes, 1969:238-242). quantum theory is, in part, a theory of the indeterminateness of knowledge. no such theory exists in the social sciences, although, to me, its adoption there is long overdue. the logical theory of probability is not in use in the social sciences, unsuccessful attempts have been made to formulate social probability along the lines of the logical theory. basically, the logical theory of probability directly addresses the problem of metaphysical content. it tries to avoid metaphysics witn a strictly inductive non-demonstrative mathematical logic of self-evident maxims. in this it is hoped that all subjective judgments will be precluded. my basic thesis on probability is that it is in essence metaphysical and all attempts to remove the metaphysical content are doomed to fail. further, i will argue that it is precisely because of the metaphysical content that probability theory has been useful to quantitative social scientists. this usefulness is in large part a function of the degree to which the mataphysics of probability are compatible with the hegemonic ideologies of social science. i will try to illustrate this thesis with a few brief looks at the origins and development of the modern theory of probability. byrne (1968:292-293) provides the following thumbnail sketch of the development of the calculus of probability: in the course of time, cardano and then pascal and fermat came to recognize that gambler's rules already in existence might provide a more effective instrument with which to deal with the contingent. these gambler's rules they and then others developed and systematized. that this more or less systematic instrument of the nonsystematic came to be known as a calculus is due not only to its character as a mathematical instrument but to imitation and adulation of the great new instrument of the systematic, the calculus of leibnitz and newton ... ... the new instrument thus inaugurated was eventually systematized by laplace according to standards of his day. but it is important to bear in mind that what is now a demonstrative system in its own right began as an instrument to deal with the non-systematic on the basis of a new theory about how to express the non-systematic: not disjunctively but in terms of a continuum of values between what happens always and what never happens. the "notion of non-systematic" needs clarification. byrne (1968:285) writes: notion is here taken in a general sense broader than that of concept and is meant to imply, without further precision, awareness of or consciousness of. non-sy s temat ic is also taken in a broad sense and is meant to imply non-necessity, or non-certain, or non-demonstrated, or even non-scientific in the thomlst sense which is not unrelated to the modern 'indeterminate'. being negative non-systematic is meant to imply also 'with respect to a given system. ' thereby what one calls non-systematic will depend on one's conception of a system. for example, if newtonian mechanics is taken to be the system, then the non-systematic will be all the relevant phenomena not explained by newtonian mechanics. this was, in fact, the original relation of the non-systematic: the first probabilists were trying to develop an instrument to handle specifically what was non-systematic with respect to the newtonian system of celestial mechanics. whereas the newtonian mechanics replaced medieval cosmology, the founders of proability theory sought to replace medieval disputational means of discerning the probability of judgments. the medieval concepts of probability as (1) probabilis : an argumentatively supported proposition, and (2) contingens : events that occur either ut in pluribus or ut in paucioribus were carried over into the new probability theory as (1) the logical interpretation: probability or degree of confirmation of a proposition, and (2) mathematical interpretation: probability or relative frequency of a class of variables (byrne, 1968:302). now let us take a look at the leading models and see what manifestations these concepts have once fully articulated. the logical theory of probability, as i mentioned earlier, is not in use in the social sciences, but it does indicate the culmination of a particular line of probabilistic thinking and is noteworthy in this respect. following a theme initiated by leibniz, attempts have been made to develop a general logic combining formal logic and the calculus of probability. john venn, c.s. peirce, richard von mises, hans reichenbach, and j.m. keynes all made contributions toward this project, and the work of rudolf carnap represents its most successful formulation (byrne , 1968:20-21; nagel, 1939:42-43). carnap distinguished between probability as (1) degree of confirmation, and (2) relative frequency over time. taking the former as his problematic, he says, "a definition of an explicandum for probability must not refer to any person and his beliefs but only to the two sentences and their logical properties within a given language system" (carnap, 1950:43; quoted in byrne, 1968:21). hence, a deliberate attempt is made to control opinionative (metaphysical) content. carnap 's approach to probability is part of his project to develop a wholly non-demonstrative inductive logic. the basic problem lies in consistently assigning numerical values to the degrees of confirmation for opinionative judgments. carnap believes that quantification is the only guarantor of this needed consistency (1950:220-226). as a general logic, all this could be constructed on the basis of elementary set theory, which carnap proceeds to do. however, the effectiveness of the construction is problematical. it is already disputable whether opinionative judgments about contingent events are in any sense quantitative and hence mathematically formalizable. carnap suggests that this issue is merely technical: if the logic can be constructed, then it will be effective (1950:242). yet, as byrne (1968:22) points out, that a formal logic can ever be capable of such a task is seriously challenged by two important theorems of meta-logic: craig's and godel's. craig's theorem is for replacing a formal linguistic system of theoretical terms with another with the same empirical content but no theoretical terms. nagel (1961:135-137) shows that this method of replacement becomes unworkable when the subject axioms (in this case opinionative judgments) are very numerousand that in order to specify, the replacement axioms the set of true statements about the subject axioms must be closed (i.e., known in advance). byrne (1968: 22-23) adds that opinionative judgments are at least numerous and in principle unlimited and that the very notion of opinionative judgments entails openness for the set of true statements about them. godel's theorem shows that formal axiomatic systems such as catnap's are necessarily incomplete in that proof of internal consistency (in this case, effectiveness) cannot be made within that system. instead, such proofs must come from without — a requirement that puts carnap' s entire project of a non-demonstrative inductive logic into serious question (nagel and newman, 1958:96-97). in sum, although the issue is not yet closed, there appear to be insurmountable 8 obstacles confronting a non-metaphysical logic of probability at levels both material (craig's theorem) and formal (gtidel's theorem). the mathematical theory of probability is like the logical theory of probability in that it can be constructed out of elementary set theory but would be subject to the critique of gbdel's theorem if metaphysical assumptions were not acknowledged. as with carnap's logical theory, the question being posed of the mathematical theory is not the adequacy of the formal system, but rather the interpretation of that system. while there are numerous ways that a mathematical theory of probability could be built upon the arithmetic of proper fractions (nagel, 1939:40-41), the linkages between the formal system and physical events would have to be drawn extra-mathematically. as venn (1962:87; quoted in byrne, 1968: 31) observes: when probability is ... divorced from direct reference to objects, as it substantially is by not being founded upon experience, it simply resolves itself into the common algebraical or arithmetical doctrine of permutations and combinations . emil borel and george polya suggest that the link is to be established by the practical certitude of the user. borel is distrustful of the opinion of a single individual, because it is too likely to be subjective. objective certitude arises through the common agreement of many prudent individuals. borel (quoted in byrne, 1968:18) states: the only reason why we regard as certain some well demonstrated mathematical facts ... is that the demonstrations have been reconsidered and verified by a large number of persons. it is fair to infer that these persons are assumed to be mathematicians, thus creating an elite consensus theory of truth (to which i will return in my examination of polanyi's views). it is also fair to make a strict logical rejection of this view on the grounds that it is tautological: borel seeks to justify practical applications of the mathematical theory of probability, which would include the law of large numbers, through reference to a practical situation in which the law of large numbers is 9 apparently assumed to be valid a priori. polya avoids the errors of carnap and borel by admitting that a formal system is neither selfjustifying nor connected to an observable reality in a non-mediated way. according to polya, we can, nonetheless, approach a formal system as if it were integrally connected to observable reality, insorfar as it is plausible to do so. polya (1954a: 198-199) outlines the grounds of plausibility: ... the credence that we place in a conjecture is bound to depend on our whole background , on the scientific atmosphere of our time ... in dealing with the observable reality, we can never arrive at any demonstrative truth, we have always to rely on some plausible ground. i think polya points in the right direction. why does probability theory have credibility as a deductive system? it has credibility only because it conforms to our background expectations about what a deductive system is like. why is there such confidence in the applicability of probability theory to social phenomena? because our background assumptions about the nature of social phenomena makes such application entirely plausible (though non-demonstrable). in this, polya is making tacit reference to what i have been calling a "metaphysics of normality." the only thing he has not done is put this into its historical and political context. i hope that the first part of this essay succeeded in establishing some of this context: (1) probability theory was adopted as a technique for use within the general method of quantitative social thought, wherein the conception of social phenomenon employed necessitated the assumptions that social reality had a pre-categorical facticity, that human behavior was quantifiable, and that these quantities had corresponding elements in number theory; and (2) this development was instrumental (a) to the rising bourgeoisie's interest in the rational planning of society through bureaucracies of official morality, and (b) to the ability to legitimate bourgeois rule through rhetorical reference to hard, numerical, quantitative science. in sura, 10 probability theory is plausibly applied to social phenomena because we have historically arrived at reified conceptions of what tocial phenomena are like and how to study them. of all the probabi lists surveyed thus far, some have acknowledged the presence of metaphysics in their conceptions of science and others have asserted its absence. of those who recognize the incompleteness or impossibility of logical and/or mathematical formulations of social probability without metaphysical presuppositions, none have tried to specify the use of metaphysics in this enterprise. micheal polanyi is an exception. polanyi provides a strong but ultimately circular critique of the myth of scientific objectivity. against the view of the relationship between science and its object as being impersonal and dispassionate, polanyi (1964) presents a wealth of evidence from the history of science to show that in all forms of knowing there is a tacit dimension which is ultimately more important than any established scientific method, evidence, or explanation. this dimension is the "personal participation of the knower in all acts of understanding" (1964:xiii). this participation is the effect of the opinions, prejudices, and preconceptions (i.e., metaphysics) of the knower upon the act of knowing. for the scientist, these would include "personal obligations to universal standards" (1964:17). with regards to probability, a probability statement is an incomplete and personal commitment according to one's framework of personal judgment (1964: 29). probability statements are thereby partially formalized within certain maxims understood to be no more than "rules of the art" (thus utilizing the strengths of an internally-consistent system without the weaknesses of extra-systemic truth claims) (1964 : 30-31) . polanyi recognizes that the scientist acts in dialogue with other scientists and with the traditions and norms of scientific practice, i.e., the social nature of science and, 11 hence, the social character of personal commitment. this means that a scientist's personal commitment to "universal standards" is influenced by factors outside the scientist. polanyi (1964:375) considers the influence on scientists to be "superior knowlege," which he defines, as "beside the systems of science and other factual truths, all that is coherently believed to be right and excellent by men within their culture." this "network of confidence" enables science to survive as a "coherent system of superior knowledge, upheld by people mutually recognizing each other as scientists, and acknowledged by modern society as its guide." full of post-enlightenment optimism, polanyi becomes a propagandist for a hegemonic elite technocracy. well aware of the horrors of stalinist and nazi scientism (1964:224-245), polanyi nonetheless opts for an elite consesus theory of truth. despite his sympathy for galileo, mesmer, d.c.miller, and other victim s of elite hegemony, nowhere does polanyi question the ability of the present scientific community to make the right decisions at the right times. he improves probability theory by including metaphysics in the creative act of probability assertion, but capitulates to bourgeois hegemony by not institutionalizing any means to critically reflect upon the metaphysics received. polya (1948: 208-209) recognizes this as a procedural necessity: "no idea is really bad, unless we are uncritical ... don't let your suspicion, or guess, or conjecture grow without examination till it becomes ineradicable. at any rate, in theoretical matters, the best of ideas is hurt by uncritical acceptance and thrives on critical examination." in contradistinction, polanyi is advocating what i warn against : technocratic planning by scientists uncritical of their own metaphysical presuppositions. some of the general problems of probability theory have been demonstrated. more difficulties arise when it is used in social science. this can be demonstrated by examining the ways it is used there. one way probability theory enters the methods of social research is 12 as an aid to sampling statistics. there it is used to ensure the selection of a representative sample. the problem it solves is the problem created by purposive sampling — maybe we can control for all extraneous variables we can anticipate, but what about extraneous variables ve have not anticipated? ford (1975:271) describes fisher's solution through probability sampling: his idea was to go about the whole business of casting for samples the other way around. if you can select imaginary variables to render them systematic, then, he reasoned, perhaps you can unselect the unimaginary ones to render them unsystematic. if you can be reasonably sure that their variation is indeed unsystematic from the point of view of your theory, then you can assume that any biases in your sample are also unsystematic, so these biases can be regarded as irrelevant from all conceivable points of view and thus can be ignored. the key to this is randomization. through randomization it is hoped that there will be no relevant differences between the sample and the universe from which it is drawn, and therefore any differences present are irrelevant. once you have a sample whose members were as equally likely to have been drawn as all those in the universe from which they came,, the calculus of probability may be employed to calculate the probability that your sample is biased in any relevant respect (ford, 1968:273). this is all well and good as long as one is dealing with experimental data hut, as selvin (1957) has pointed out, when non-experimental data are used certain problems arise. since the data are non-experimental, the researcher has no grounds for believing that there are no correlated biases greater than the random errors in the sample. these biases may have even an undetectable supressor effect. this rules out the calculus of probability (in this case, tests of significance). according to selvin (1957:522), "... only when all important correlated biases have been controlled is it legitimate to measure the possible influence of random errors by statistical tests of significance." of course, in order to control "all 13 important correlated biases" it is necessary to know what they are. this sounds to me like purposive sampling. if selvin is right, then probability sampling is randomly-collected purposive sampling with the assumption that there are no correlated biases greater than the random errors (a metaphysic of normality). while finding value in selvin, ford takes a different route to the same conclusion. she looks at the formal mathematics involved, specifically the requirement that "whenever the separate probability values of all mutually exclusive units are added together at the same time, che result must add up to 1" (1975:290). that this is impossible to link with events has been recognized in some statistical circles. in 1948 g.a. barnard criticized h. jeffreys' social statistics on this point (it is equally applicable to the school of r.a. fisher): the snag in professor jeffreys' theory is that to work it one has to specify a probability distribution for a class of alternative hypotheses and the whole of the probability has to be distributed. one must when interpreting one's experiments be able to think of all possible explanations of the data, and that, i think, none of us believe that we can do. it is always possible for someone to produce later an entirely new explanation we had never thought of, and which would not be represented in the hypothesis nor in the alternatives we had tested, (quoted in hogben, 1957:25.) ford (1975:291) sees this as a severe restriction of the applicability of probability statistics in general: for, unless the cases under consideration at any particular level of analysis may be properly regarded as derivable from a precisely defined and logically exhaustive set of nonoverlapping (i.e., mutually exclusive) units, then none of the impressive methods and techniques of probability theory will be applicable. the case against probability sampling is especially strong, for instead of solving the problems of purposive sampling, the formal requirements of the calculus of probability mean that they can only be employed "within a clearly defined set of units, that is, within a purposive sample" (ford, 1975:291, her emphasis). 14 an illustration of latent political bias is provided by an extension of neuberg's (1977:4-5, 20) critique of objectivist probability on the grounds of the unique character of a social event. he argues that social-level events (such as france becoming a monarchy) occur in a manner which cannot be recreated by replicating the circumstances. this is equally true for individual elements of a random sample. neuberg (1977:5) argues: the usual situation in a social-statistical study is a population model . . . the a priori assumption is that each element of the sample has been drawn at random, under similar circumstances, from the same population. if this assumption is not fulfilled the meaningfulness of the resulting explanation is open to question. one area, for example, where the assumption appears systematically doubtable is in .econometric time-series analysis. here the sample points are, originally, possibly distant from each other in social-level time. it is difficult to conceive a sense in which the elements of such a sample have been "drawn at random, under similar circumstances, from the same population". hence the uniqueness of social-level events is the basis of an explanation of the explanatory unreliability of econometric time-series models over longer periods of time. neuberg (1977:19-20) briefly notes that this may be because of the"special quality of soc.al-level («* historical) time" and cites lukacs' (.1971:89-90) argument that reified thought "degrades time to the dimension of space." in this way "time sheds its qualitative, variable, flowing nature; it freezes into an exactly delimited, quantifiable continuum filled with quantifiable 'things' ... in short, it becomes space." i would extend this argument somewhat to underscore the a priori assumption that social time is quantitative (newtonian). gurvitch (1964: 27-38) argues that social time is a conceptual derivative of a world-view and varies considerably within world-views according to need. husserl (1964:29, 77) argues that social time is wholly constituted by the experiential subject and that phenomenal time (e.g. standard time) has nothing more than an ascriptive status. both of these positions seriously challenge the assumption that time frames between unique events are comparable in any quantitative sense. this assumption has three additional features — the metaphysics of normality — which make the theorem politically 15 conservative : (1) the social subject cannot be an active participant in social time, either physically (e.g., intervening in such a way as to cause changes within the time frame) or cognitively (reflecting upon, interpreting, or reconstituting the experience of social time) ; (2) no part of the time frame can be anything other than a quantitative development of earlier parts (e.g., quantum leaps in time are precluded as well as any concept of determinism other than a linear causal model. the possibilities/probabilities for the future are wholly limited to quantitative developments of the present.) ; (3) if social time is viewed as newtonian space, then motive forces to change states woi.ld have to be extrinsic to the subjects at hand. this makes it possible for the subjects to be wholly quantifiable, i.e., for all behavior to be subsumed by and understood through number theory. to assume that social behavior can be subsumed by number theory is to believe that the limitations of numerical formulations do not apply to social analysis or social behavior. this metaphysics of normality is also the logical error of affirming the consequent because the second premise affirms the consequence of the hypothetical first premise. probability theory is only for the testing of judgments. it is when probability is seen as referring to material occurrence, i.t., events, that the confusion of causality and probability comes about. while i have no sympathy for any causal models in social research, probability in no way fits into a causal model. the concept of a probabilistic law is only possible when the unknown, a feature of judgments, is viewed as a material force in social events. this is one of the most common errors of bourgeois thought: to equate one's way of thinking about the world with the way things happen in the world (mistaking epistemology for ontology). in this way probability theory could be viewed as a source for social theory inductively drawn from frequency distributions (recall snizek's (1975) finding that mode of analysis determines theoretical perspective). logical grounds for rejecting inductively obtained explanations are given by hempel, who finds probabilistic laws to have nothing other than analogic credibility (1966:67). i think the most explicit dismissal of any connection between causal laws and probabilistic reasoning is provided by 16 polya (1954b; 100), who imagines a doctor trying to comfort a patient with the remark, "you have a very serious disease. of ten persons who get this disease, only one survives. but do not worry. it is lucky you came to me, for i have recently had nine patients with this disease and they all died of it." my final remark on probability theory as a method in social science deals with several small points made previously about the conflation of events with judgments and about the closed and unambiguous set of transformations available to probability. it has been suggested that graduate study in the social sciences is chiefly a process of indoctrination which occurs surreptitiously through the acquisition of a new language (pozzuto, 1975:20-21, 166-171). the notion that social probability is a language unto itself is plausible. in wittgenstein's view, language is a socially shared and practiced activity through which we learn and know what things are: "we predicate of the thing what lies in the method of representing it" (wittgenstein, 1953:46). that the truth claims of a language cannot be made within that language, but rather must be established through a richer language, is demonstrated by tarski (1944:341-376). what this means for the problem at hand is that if it is true that social probability is a language or like a language, then it constitutes a picture of the world whose validity cannot be established within its own logic. instead, validation must come from without, and i think i know where. consider the plausibility of the following experiment. go back in mnemonic time to your first indoctrination session into the secret meta-language of statistical probabilistic social analysis. remember all the examples about coins, dice, cards, and roulette wheels which made the case for the applicability of probability to social analysis so strong. those examples mystified us. the problem is that social-level events simply do not occur within 17 the same conditions necessary to say anything meaningful about the coins, dice, cards, and roulette wheels. in the case of the latter, it is not by chance that one knows the total distribution of probabilities, i.e., that a coin has two faces, that dice have six sides, and so on. in fact, the key concept of the latter is that everyone has full and complete knowledge of the total set of possibilities. it is in terms of this knowledge that meaningful frequencies can be calculated because everything relevant is known about them. the basic law of social statistics is that you must have a representative sample. powerful andef fective randomizing techniques are available to ensure this. but in ensuring representation, they also ensure that the parameters of the sample are unknown. nothing is known about the sample except that it is unknown and that anything discovered about it will be new data, i.e., everything relevant is unknown about it . this difference between dice, etc., and random samples, is irreducible and prevents transferability from one system to the next. nonetheless inductive leaps are frequently made between the two levels because of common sensical habits of mind, gramsci (1971:419) said that common sense is "the conception .of the world which is uncritically absorbed by the various social and cultural environments in which the moral individuality of the average (person) is developed," the inductive leap is facilely made because of the pre-ref lective habit of mind to think quantiatively and probabilistically about social events as a way of using human foresight in planning one's day. life u'ider capitalism predisposes people to pervasive habits of this sort in that every part of one's day can be fractured into discrete units, the manipulation of which is rarely reflectively regarded. the dominant ideas in social reasoning (commonsensical or quantitative-probabilistic) conform to the ideology of the ruling class. 18 in sum, probability theory is a logic, a language, a set theory, or a way of comraonsensical reasoning; the connection of which to social events can only be inductively (metaphysically) established. rather than making the link to the social world for statistical methods, probability theory is a stalking horse with which we can be ideological and confirm our commonsensical presuppositions about the social world while appearing to be scientific and anti-metaphysical. (perhaps the discipline selects for people who are predisposed to this sort of reasoning; just the fact that all these people at some time in their lives decided to go to graduate school indicates they are all gamblers to a certain extent). finally, i wish to conclude by returning to a point raised previously: the connection between quantitative social thought and the "analytical and calculating form of thought of the bourgeoisie." douglas (1971b ;58-59) believes that there are two major points of confluence : first, (bureaucratic rationality) contributed the view of men and their actions as absolute categories (or absolute typifications) . that is, rather than see men and their actions as the continuous, situation-bound, concrete persons we normally assume for our purposes of everyday interaction, it saw them as discrete, discontinuous phenomena that are independent of time and situations. it is this set of properties which is necessary before one can validly apply real numbers and mathematical analyses to human beings and their actions; it is this assumption that generates the pigeon-hole perspective on man known to all students of introductory methods in the social sciences ... second, this calculative attitude was fundamental to the development of the rational policy orientation of officials and rulers that made official information the means of 'testing' and 'proving' the effectiveness of official policies . . . the calculation of the effects of official action relative to the policy-determined practices (i.e. , effectiveness) was fundamental to the development of all official information. quantitative methods have a legitimating function. despite the undermining of the rhetorical claim to absolute rationality by twentieth century physical scientists themselves, mathematical formulations still evoke an ideology of absolute rationality in social science and the public 19 sphere (c,f. mumford, 1967). in this way, the official bureaucracies of social planning are invulnerable to any criticism that does not transcend quantitative reasoning, i.e., that does not reject the rhetorical appeal of mathematical formulations as absolute rationality. weber (1947:184-185) describes formal rationality as resting upon quantification and calculability . he views it as the mode of reasoning for modern science and industrial capitalism, especially in planning. without it, a capitalist economy could not be rationally (efficiently) administered (1958:26-27). in addition to being indispensable, it is absolutely unavoidable as the fate of the west and will pervade every apsect of social life from the administration of state bureaucracies to everyday life (1946:228-229). his scenario closes with a whole society completely rationalized by capitalism and experiencing "the absolute and complete dependence of its existence, of the political, technical and economic conditions of its life on a specially trained organization of officals" (1958:16). these ideas are very useful, but incomplete. lukacs (1971:99) expands upon weber (1946:228) to show that the members of the bureaucracy are themselves subject to rationalization and become dehumanized and mechanized as their service becomes a commodity form. schroyer (1973:184) adds that what weber calls formal rationalization is also the rising organic composition of capital, or in other words, increasing value production or growth of the capacity to create value. this is at the same time the growth of the capacity to extract surplus, i.e. material exploitation. developing themes inaugurated by kant, marx, weber and lukacs, are the recent observations of horkheimer (1947:8-9), mills (1959: 165-176), and kosik (1976:56-60) on the spread of irrationality simultaneous with and caused by advancing rationalization. rather than making individual everyday life more understandable and easier to control, rationalization 20 makes social reality more opaque and less subject to control — irrational in these senses. finally, buried within schlltz's social phenomenology is a theory of the invisibility of the expert. as experts become both more specialized and more important in the successful concentration of power in society (monopolization) t their role as constructors of world views and as corroborators of taken for granted social knowledge becomes "nearly completely invisible" (schlltz, and luckmann, 1973:315) and "entirely hidden in its anonymity" (schlltz, 1964:133). i think this is an important addition to marx's concept of reification as the domination of living human potentiality by dead, objectified labor (marx, 1969:17-18). what these additions do to weber's formulation is to turn it into a crisis theory. if this is a meaningful description of the tendencies associated with my subject, then the fundamental question to ask is what are the implications for our practical activity — as people trying to understand social reality (perhaps as critical social scientists) , and as people who have everyday lives in that social reality? there are partial answers to the first question. investigations need to be conducted into the available methodologies of social research to see (1) if they are in fact able to do what they are conceived to do, (2) if there are unacknowledged limitations on the picture of social reality they create, and (3) if these limitations have political consequences, particularly if bureaucracies of official planning are empowered to make social policy on the basis of their picture of social reality. for example, if the view of social reality is a reified one, then their policy will presuppose reification, and the "guns and butter" they impose will correspond best to the reified needs of society, and, hence, be materially constitutive of further societal reification (which is then studied and — lo and behold — confirms the presupposed reified picture 21 of social reality). my criticisms q f quantitative reasoning, statistics, and social probability can be summed up as a critique of reification. the details of the criticism can be included in lukacs' (1971:104, passim ) more general critique of reification in science for (1) losing contact with the totality by becoming a "formally closed system of partial laws", (2) ignoring the world-manufacturing effect of its work ("ontological problems of its own sphere of influence") , and (3) losing history through a freezing of the given to produce apodictically certain facts. although it is necessary to develop alternative methodologies, the answer is not a categorical rejection of quantitative methods. some of the techniques, like ordinal variables, probability sampling, probabilistic laws, and certain features of analysis, inference, and significance, must be cast on the junkheap forthwith. other techniques are not inappropriate in that they can be useful as long as one does not pretend that they are capable of dealing with anything other than appearances. what this means is that reified substitutes for real knowledge (quantified observables) are important and necessary means of apprehending and describing indicators of phenomena which as yet cannot be accounted for in any superior manner, as long as the reified status of the observables is acknowledged. this may seem like an overly simplistic solution but in practice it means an active struggle with the makers of social policy over the legitimacy of their research methods. this implies a struggle for social policy. this struggle (if the efforts of working peoples, the third world, and all others disenfranchised from the decision-making that effects them are unsuccessful) is a struggle for the future. if unsuccesful, there may be no basis for social policy other than the truncated visions of the technocrat. department <->f sociology, university of california, santa barbara. bibliography blalock, herbert m. social statistics , new york: mcgraw-hill. 1960 byrne, edmund f. 1968 carnap, rudolf. 1950 probability and opinion: a study in the medieval presuppositions of post-medieval theories of probability . the hague: martinus nijhoff. logical foundations of probability , chicago: university of chicago press. chambliss, william. "a sociological analysis of the law of vagrancy," 1964 social problems , 12, 1. clark, sir george, science and social welfare in the age of newton , 1937 oxford: clarendon. douglas, jack d. "the rhetoric of science and the origins of statistical 1971a social thought: the case of durkheira's suicide," in edward a. tiryakian (ed.) the phenomenon of sociology : a reader in the sociology of sociology, new york: appleton-century-crof ts . 1971b american social order: social rules in a pluralistic society, new york: macmillan. ford, julienne, paradigms and fairy tales: an introduction to the 1975 science of meanings. london: routledge & kegan paul. foucault, michael. madness and civilization , new york: pantheon. 1965 gramsci, antonio. selections form the prison notebooks , new york: 1971 international. gurvitch, georges. the spectrum of social time , dordrecht, holland :d.reidel 1964 hempel, carl g. philosophy of natural science , englewood cliffs, 1966 new jersey: prentice-hall. hogben, lancelot. statistical theory: the relationship of probability , 1957 horkheimer, max. 1947 husserl, edmund. 1964 kendall, m.g. 1972 credibility, and error , new york: w.w. norton. eclipse of reason , new york:seabury. the phenomenology of internal time consciousness, bloomington, ind.: indiana university press. "the history and future of statistics: in t.a. bancroft (ed.) statistical papers in honor of george w. snedecor , ames, iowa: iowa state university press. 23 lazarsfeld, paul f. "notes on the history of quantification in sociology 1961 trends, sources, and problems," isis, 52:2, lukacs, georg. 1971 marx, karl. 1969 (1863) history and class consciousness: studies in marxist dialectics , cambridge, mass.: mit resultate des unwittelbaren produktionsprozesses , franfurt: verlag neue kritik. mills, c. wright, 1959 the sociological imagination , new york: oxford university press. mumford, lewis, 1964 the pentagon of power ,' new york: harcourt-brace-jovanovich. 1967 "quality in the control of quantity," in s.v.ciriacwantrup and james j. parsons (eds.), natural resources: quality and quantity , berkeley, california university of california press. nagel, ernest. principles of the theory of probability , chicago: 1939 university of chicago press. 1961 the structure of science: problems in the logic of scientific explanation , new york: harcourt, brace & world. nagel, ernest and james r. newman. godel's proof , new york: new york 1960 university press. neubert.leland gerson. "the limits of statistics in planning analysis" 1977 polanyi, michael. 1964 quality and quantity , 11. personal knowledge: towards a post-critical philosophy , new york: harper & row. polya, george 1948 how to solve it , princeton, n.j.: princeton university press. 1954a induction and analogy in mathematics : volume one of mathematics and plausible reasoning , princeton, n.j. princeton unviersity press. 1954b patterns of plausible inference : volume two of mathematics and plausible reasoning , princeton, n.j. princeton unviersity press. pozzuto, richard. 1975 schroyer, trent. 1973 scientific sociology, alienation and community, phd dissertation, sociology department, university of oregon, eugene, oregon. the critique of domination: the origins and development of critical theory , new york: george braziller. 24 schutz, alfred. "the well-informed citizen: an essay on the social 1964 distribution of knowledge," in collected papers, volume ii, the hague: martinus nijhoff. schutz, alfred and thomas luckmann. structures of the life-world , 1973 evanston, illinois: northwestern university press. selvin, hanan c. "a critique of tests of significance in survey research,^ 1957 american sociological review , 22:4. snizek, william e. "the relationship between theory and research: 1975 a study in the sociology of sociology, sociological quarterly , 16:3. suppes, patrick. "the role of probability in quantum mechanics," 1969 in studies in the methodology and foundations of science , dordrecht, holland: d. reidel. tarski, alfred. "the semantic conception of truth and the foundations 1944 of semantics,: philosophy and phenoroenological research , 4. venn, john. 1962 logic of chance, new york: chelsea. weber, max. from max weber: essays in sociology , h.h. gerth and 1946' c. wright mills ceds.), new york: oxford university press 1947 the theor • of social and economic organization . new york: macmillan. 1958 the protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism, new york: scribners. wittgenstein, ludwig. philosophical investigations , new york:macmillan. 1953 25 the myth of autonomy in family farm production bonnie ward agricultural practice on family farms throughout ontario history provides an example of independent commodity production. according to this description, farm producers own, operate and control the means of production (hedley, 1976:415; johnson, 1979:91). the autonomy of farm producers is derived from their ability to determine the conditions of production, for example, the type and quantity of commodity produced and application of technological innovation. the capacity of producers to influence the conditions of the sale and purchase of agricultural goods significantly influences the degree of productive autonomy characteristic of farming. in a capitalist society where private ownership prevails, and the autonomy of owners is seen as providing scope for the expansion of production and innovation, the real relation between ownership and autonomy mi_st be made explicit. it will be argued that the real relationship between ownership and autonomy in farm practice is an historical relationship which is determined and conditioned by: 1. the transformation of the mode of production in society, 2. the transformation of the relations of production immediate to farming, 3. the role of the state in these transformations. through the examination of these historical processes it appears that the autonomy of small farm producers at present is a myth. farm production seems to be increasingly characterized not by autonomy but by dependency; dependency among members of farm families and of small farmers on the state. the transformation of the mode of production may be more precisely described as the process by which a particular mode of production emerges as dominant in a society. in ontario history, the most significant transformation in this regard is the emergence of the * revised version of a paper presented to the canadian sociology and anthropology association, saskatoon, june, 1979. capitalist mode of production. the rise of capitalism has two effects: capitalist relations may replace previously existing relations of production, or previously existing relations of production may be retained but in a new relation to the capitalist market. in ontario farm history both effects can be observed. at present, in ontario, there is evidence that the production of agricultural commodities is increasingly organized by capitalist relations (warnock:123; johnson, 1979:94). the replacement of the family farm by corporate (capitalist) farming occurs after the incorporation of family farm production into the capitalist market. in fact, it is incorporation of the family farm into capitalist market relations which results in the eventual elimination of increasing numbers of small farms. the process by which family farm production is transformed by the emergence of capitalism is the context for the analysis of the relation between ownership and autonomy. h. saffioti, describing the emergence to dominance of the capitalist mode of production, states: a mode of production is dominant insofar as it interferes vertically in other modes of production thus provoking the latter's loss of autonomy and redefining their specific activities . . . hence they are only able to survive thanks to a process of redefinition governed by the capitalist mode of production ... what remains are precapitalist work relations which now have new connotations. (1977:30) vertical interference by the capitalist mode of production describes the process which has transformed independent commodity production in agriculture. the family farm persists but under conditions substantially altered by the capitalist market. competitive conditions for marketing agricultural produce confront the farmer as pressure for specialization, with consequent risks of overproduction, and loss in real income in addition to the natural/biological risks of agricultural production 50 (smith, 1978:19-23; mitchell, .1975:18-21; hedley, 1976:417). what is clearly suggested by the vertical interference of capitalism is the possibility of retaining individual ownership while experiencing significant alteration in other conditions of production. the alteration of market conditions and pressure for specialization with its concomitant risks, result in risk minimizing practices which may in themselves limit productivity (hedley, 1976:418). the double bind that emerges with transformed productive conditions limits the autonomy of the farmer in terms of the type and quantity of goods produced, the scale of operation and the necessity of adopting technological innovations in order to remain competitive. vertical interference of the capitalist mode of production limits autonomy further in the sphere of ownership of the means of production. the necessity of greater investment in land and machinery in order to maintain competitive levels of production leads to ever increasing dependence on credit and corporate controlled production and marketing of farm machinery, fertilizer and fuel. that is, there emerges a dependence of the farmer on capitalist relations for the necessities of productive consumption. the increasing determination by capitalist market relations of not only the type and quantity of product but also the costs of production continually narrows the sphere of autonomy of agricultural producers. is the integration of independent commodity production in agriculture into capitalist market relations simply a precursor to the eventual demise of all "family farm" production? evidence of the increasing corporatization of agriculture and the decrease in small farms have led some to conclude that this is the case (johnson, 1979:98). there are, however, factors and conditions which mediate the tendency to corporatization and the erosion of small farm production. 51 it appears that certain types of agricultural production (e.g. fruit, tobacco) are particularly amenable to organization on capitalist lines, whereas other sectors retain more traditional forms of productive organization. region also appears to be a mediating factor in the corporatization process. the comparison of the rate of corporatization of agriculture in ontario and quebec reveals that quebec agricultural practice may be more resistant to change (johnson, 1979:98). protective legislation and tax concessions which benefit individual farmers may be understood as legitimating activities of the state which affect the corporatization process. to the extent that tradition, region and ideology may influence the rate of corporatization of agriculture, their relationship to the transformation of the mode of production needs clarification. saffioti, in her analysis of the process of vertical interference with precapitalist forms of productive organization by the capitalist mode of production, postulates that this process has the effect of retaining only the economic aspect of precapitalist work, relations and eliminating their ideological aspect, which it replaces with bourgeois ideology (saf fioti :30) . such a hypothesized replacement of one ideology with another does not appear to adequately reflect the way in which world views change. while it seems likely that new productive relations generate new ideological counterparts, some aspects of traditional world views persist and continue to be reproduced. if ideas are viewed as singularly determined by productive relations, then the transformation of productive relations ought to lead directly to the transformation of ideas. however, this appears not necessarily to be the case. in the preceding discussion it was suggested that the conditions of farming have been significantly transformed such that the margin of autonomy of the small producer is increasingly reduced. in spite of the altered 52 conditions of production, autonomy persists ideologically as the counterpart of private ownership. belief in the autonomy of individual owners may persist as a result of the reluctance of individuals to alter their beliefs in accordance with changes in the world. alternately, this belief may be reproduced ideologically and serve to justify practices related to capitalist expansion. (owners of capitalist enterprises may have considerable autonomy) . ideological reproduction of the relation of ownership to autonomy in the context of capitalist development mystifies the real effects of that development for small agricultural producers. the latter explanation can be examined by reference to the degree of autonomy which existed in family farming historically. the myth of autonomy in agricultural production has its historical origins in the notion of the self sufficient agriculture of pioneer families. v. fowke has argued that self sufficiency is itself a myth "which is an integral part of canadian folklore" (fowke, 1962:23). far from self sufficiency, pioneer agriculture was characterized by the need for capital as a precondition for settlement, barter and the extension of credit as a means to provide for domestic and productive consumption, and the need for markets for surplus products (fowke, 1962). settlement of the canadian frontier was not the culmination of the pioneering dream of daring individuals. it was rather, a means to escape industrial labour, famine and political revolution (loyalists) and for some, the chance to acquire greater wealth and position. ontario pioneer settlements were not located by chance but were a product of british interest in providing defense for trade routes and for the provisioning of military personnel and traders (fowke, 1946:118). from the outset, it became apparent that settlement provided an excellent investment opportunity, not through agricultural production but in the movement of settlers. "there were profitable investment opportunities 53 associated with the original transfer and installation of prospective farm populations" (fowke, 1946:118). this relation is further evidenced by the responsibility of the bureau of agriculture established in 1852, for immigration policy (fowke, 1946:121). the combination of the dependence of farmers on market conditions (capital, barter, credit) and on the state for acquiring land is evidence of the interconnectedness of agricultural production with political and economic interests from its inception. while this interconnectedness does not necessarily imply a lack of autonomy, it does create a basis from which historical relations of dependence may be seen to emerge. v. fowke, in identifying the historical pattern in canadian agricultural policy states: the clearest and most significant uniformity regarding canadian agriculture for more than three hundred years has been its deliberate and consistent use as a basis for economic and political empire. (1978:3) while economic and political interests are significant in the determination of agricultural settlement, it would appear that at least for a time, a period of relative autonomy of agricultural producers could be said to have existed. this is in part due to periods of favourable market conditions and minimally due to the protective actions of the state (jones: 196, 307). in addition, it could be argued that productive relations organized on the basi6 of collective labours of family members contributed to the possibility of a relative degree of autonomy in agricultural production. the family constitutes a basis for production from which a considerable number of benefits can be derived. the division of labour among family members facilitated the diversification of production which contributed both to domestic consumption and to the production of commodities. the work of women, often associated with production closer 54 to the home, could be drawn upon at times when additional labour was required in the fields. the contribution of children to agricultural production beginning at an early age provided additional necessary labour (johnson, 1974:17). when inadequate resources were available for establishing a farm, family members worked for wages before or during the early years of settlement (fowke, 1962:32-33). the intense labour required and the need for financial resources in agriculture prior to 1850 necessitated a co-operative productive unit like the family for survival (johnson, 1974:15-22). however, these conditions would change. the introduction of mass education and use of technology in agricultural production were significant in the change in participation of family members (johnson, 1974:23). with increasing specialization and transformation of productive relations, women (and children) became increasingly separated from the production of commodities. this separation was enhanced ideologically by the emergent role of 'chatelaine 1 , the wife of the 'better class' of entrepreneur. the agricultural practice of the wealthiest settlers was thus set up as the model for all agricultural practice. this point is illustrated by the tendency for the wealthiest settlers to be the organizers of agricultural societies and the initiators of technological innovation (jones :157, 174). similarly, the separation of the "chatelaine" from the production of commodities may have exerted ideological pre-eminence over relations of interdependence of family members which characterized most farming. at this point i would like to note that i am somewhat skeptical about historical accounts of the time and degree of separation of women from agricultural commodity production. it is unclear whether the productive relations described are those of the majority of farmers or of "ideal" (affluent) farmers. for the moment, this question must be 55 suspended pending further investigation. what is clear however, is that while there may be evidence of the decreasing role of women in commodity production (hedley, 1977:6; johnson, 1974:24) the work of women in creating conditions for continued commodity production is significant. women have often taken on tasks of bookkeeping and business management (kohl, 1978:52). women's role in reproduction and domestic work also provides the basis for long and short run production of labour power required by the enterprise. further, the efforts of the family, particularly of women, toward decreasing consumption of commodities and the production of use value offers a measure of protection in "lean" times. more relevant in recent times would be the contribution by family members of wages. as input of capital comes to have ever increasing importance, family members more frequently have off-farm employment. it may be argued that the shift from interdependence of family members in agricultural labour to dependence on family members for wage inputs is a qualitative change. analysis of the significance of wage inputs to the persistence of many family farm operations in ontario warrants further investigation and evidence. in all of the above ways, the productive interdependence of family members has contributed greatly to creating conditions of flexibility in an enterprise vulnerable to "acts of god", of the market and of the state. this flexibility could be said to account for the relative degree of autonomy differentially experienced by farm producers historically. as is implicit in the foregoing discussion, the capacity of internal relations of family farm production to offer protection from transformed market conditions is limited. m. hedley states, "the significance of the involvement of domestic producers in commodity production is that reproduction of the mode of production is unavoidably 56 dependent on the process of exchange" (hedley, 1977: a). this dependency is at present mediated by the state through agricultural policy, trade policy, supervision of marketing boards, and tax, succession and zoning laws, to name a few examples. fowkes' thesis of the dependence of farm producers on dominant economic and political interests, extended into the present, suggests there is little basis for believing that small producers will, in the long run, be offered any measure of protection. this skepticism is well founded, as an examination of the report of the task force on agriculture, (1967) reveals. the recommendations of this report include : 1. reduction of the number of farms with about 2/3 of farm families removed. 2. increase in farm size. 3# greater rationalization of farming with an increase in "backward, forward, horizontal integration" with agricultural business interests. 4. "a clearcut separation of welfare and commercial farm policy". (summarized from warnock, 1971:126) my emphasis the government disowned this report without providing a substitute policy (cayley, 19.73:8). however, a detailed analysis of the historical conditions which give rise to recommendations of this sort is required. points like the emergence of an overlap in "welfare and commercial policy" obviously need to be examined. these recommendations are indicative of the extensive involvement of the state in the reproduction and transformation of agricultural production and certainly suggest the emergence of dependency and the almost complete erosion of the autonomy of small producers. some further, and perhaps less obvious, characteristics of the role of the state may be suggested. if in fact an appropriation of ideologies of pre-capitalist modes of production occurs, what is the concrete 57 character of that appropriation? one example would be the continued affirmation of individual patriarchal ownership (see hedley, 1977:7). this clearly denies the history of productive interdependence of family members in favour of a definition which reproduces an individualistic ideology and the legal subordination of women. at the interpersonal level, this relation is reproduced in the reluctance of federal and provincial bureaucratic agents to deal with farmers' wives in business matters (kohl, 1978:51). kohl states: "the formal definition of the male role as the official 'producer' in north american society is based on and reinforced by the embodiment of that status in law" (1978:51). in marketing, the state has played a primary mediating role in the establishment and control of production quotas through marketing boards. the protection offered to farmers through these agencies is useful only insofar as increases in productivity and conditions of the purchase of quota facilitate the expansion necessary for survival. this places the small producers in an increasingly vulnerable position (cayley, 1973:5). it appears that autonomy in agricultural production has been progressively eroded by the transformation of market conditions. the internal relations of production of the family farm offer a limited amount of protection from these tendencies. the state, while periodically offering limited protection to individual producers, ultimately functions to facilitate that development and expansion of capitalist interests. in spite of these developmental tendencies, the ideology of autonomy derived from private ownership of the means of production persists and is reproduced. in terms of highly visible cultural tendencies, the "back to nature" movement and the purchase of hobby farms by members of high income groups reaffirm the myth of autonomy. loss of ownership (the final loss of autonomy) is explained in terms of the "inefficiency" of producers. this explanation serves to 58 transpose a characteristic defined by the mode of production to a statement of the inadequacy of an individual producer. as long as the loss of autonomy of individual producers can be explained in terms of their individual shortcomings, changes at the level of the social organization of production remain unexamined. the framework for analysis outlined in the preceding discussion yields several areas requiring further investigation: 1. the persistence of farm based independent commodity production in certain sectors delimited by type of production, geography and culture needs to be examined. to what extent does independent commodity production in these sectors serve the interests of capitalist expansion? that is, to what extent are the risks borne by the producers such that corporatization of that sector would be a poor investment? a further question raised is the extent that corporatization of agriculture is impeded by traditional practices and by cultural considerations. research into these questions would contribute greatly to an understanding of the transformation of farming which occurs with the emergence of capitalism in ontario. 2. the relations of production on the family farm, i have argued, offer certain limited protection to the enterprise by providing some flexibility. in the present day, the most significant contribution of family members residing on small farms may be the income they derive from other sources. a work-farm pattern is emerging in canadian agriculture. in ontario, it would be worthwhile to look at the wage contributions of farm wives as i suspect they may be significant for the persistence of many small farm operations. the transformation from interdependence in production of family members to dependence on wage inputs for security of the farm is a phenomenon which remains unexamined. 3. a third area requiring elaboration is the role of the state. 59 critical analyses of the state are fairly recent and the complexity of thia task makes it formidable. such analyses as applied to farming would have to encompass the mediating role of the state in the market, the ideological function of the state and political parties* and the history and impact of agrarian protest movements, to mention only several aspects. this task is central to work in agricultural history because of the peculiar relation of political practice to agriculture from the first settlements. while the scope of the analytic task here outlined is broad, a more comprehensive analysis of the determinants of agricultural production is required. it is essential that analyses cease to focus on "inefficiency" and "traditionalism" of individual producers and become recast at the level of explaining individual practice in terms of the social relations of production. the relation between autonomy and individual ownership must be demystified in order that the collective interests of farm producers can be articulated. the realities of productive organization rather than their ideological representations are the only adequate basis for political action of farm producers. department of sociology/ queen's university 60 references cayley, david 1973 "the rise of the national fanners union." this magazine , vol. 7, no. 3. fowke, vernon c. 1946 canadian agricultural policy the historical pattern . toronto: university of toronto press. 1962 "the myth of the self sufficient canadian pioneer." transactions of the royal society of canada , vol. lvi , series iii. hedley, max j. 1976 "independent commodity production and the dynamics of tradition." canadian review of sociology and anthropology , 13, 4. 1977 "transformation of the domestic mode of production." paper presented at the annual meetings of the canadian sociology and anthropology association, fredericton. johnson, leo. 1972 "the development of class in canada in the twentieth century," in g. teeple, ed., capitalism and the national question in canada . toronto: university of toroi.to press. 1974 'the political economy of ontario women in the nineteenth century," in women at work ontario 1850-1930 . toronto: canadian women's educational press. 1979 "precapitalist economic formations and the capitalist market in canada 1911-1971," in j. curtis and w. g. scott, eds., social stratification: canada . scarborough: prentice-hall. jones, robert l. 1977 the history of agriculture in ontario 1613-1880 . toronto: university of toronto press. kohl, seena b. 1976 working together: women and the family in south western saskatchewan . toronto: holt, rinehart and winston. 1978 "women's participation in the north american family farm." women's studies international quarterly , vol. 1, no. 1. mitchell, don. 1975 the politics of food . toronto: james lorimer and co. saffioti, heleieth i. b. 1977 "women, mode of production and social formations." latin american perspectives , vol. 4, nos . 1 § 2. 61 smith, pamela 1978 "comments on the analysis of the political economy of canadian agriculture." paper presented at the political economy session, learned societies meetings, london, ont. taylor, norma 1976 '"all this for three and a half a day': the farm wife," in g. matheson, ed., women in the canadian mosaic . toronto: peter martin associates. warnock, john w. 1971 "the farm crisis" in l. lapierre, e_t. al . , eds., essays on the left. toronto: mcclelland and stewart. 62 claus orfe and the capitalist state: a critique gordon haas claus offe's work may be regarded as a synthesis between certain marxist concepts and systems theory and has broad implications for marxist theories of the state. this paper will present and criticize offe's ideas with special regard to the status of historical materialism in his work. the historical materialist method (the analysis of production and appropriation of surplus) is not immune to improvement. however, the borrowing of concepts specific to historical materialism for use in a synthesis serves only to vitiate the method. this occurs because the differing background assumptions of the concepts utilized are contradictory and thus render the conclusions incomprehensible. offe's synthesis is an exemplar of the problems inherent in synthesizing approaches. offe's work blends functional ism, marxian political economy, and systems theory. the characteristic teleology of functional analysis is established on the basis of a 'marxian' analysis of the commodity. we shall demonstrate that the concepts which offe borrows from marxism are not utilized in a valid fashion and that logical inconsistencies exist in his work even if the former is ignored. in the first section of the paper, offe's thesis is presented; the second section will provide a critical assessment. the paper concludes with an evaluation of offe's contribution to marxist research. offe's theory of state and society from the outset of his argument offe dispenses with the marxist revised version of a paper presented to the canadian sociology and anthropology association, saskatoon, june, 1979. base/superstructure distinction and instead portrays capitalist society as three functionally related sub-systems: the economic, the political, and the normative. a sub-system is defined as a set of relationships and processes having a specific coherence based in an 'organizing principle' specific to the sub-system. the principle of the economic system is exchange, the political system is organized on the basis of power, while the normative system is neglected by offe and, aside from an indication of its normative nature, does not have a principle defined for it (1976:. 34,53).* offe argues that sub-system relations are concerned with the creation and maintenance of the conditions of economic dominance as the economic system is dominant (in that its stability is crucial to general system stability). for this reason, the non-economic systems are cast as 'flanking' systems as their operation must uphold the dominance of the exchange principle (1976: 34,35). adding that a system is inherently unstable offe is able to reduce the question of general system equilibrium to the inter-play of the three organizing principles. to be precise, however, system instability is not the result of the principles themselves but rather is due to the processes based on the principles. in this view, over-all system crisis consists of processes based in one principle coming to control processes organized by another principle. given that three unstable sub-systems are linked in an over-all unstable system we can see that offe's intent is to investigate the nature and conditions of equilibrium for each sub-system as well as the general system. through such an investigation an over-all social dynamic may be found. for each system offe must ask: 'what is it about the processes within the system that produces instability, what •unless otherwise noted, all references are to offe. 27 are the implications of this instability for the other systems, and how is stability regained in all systems?'. simply stated then, offe's object consists of the conditions of the maintenance of economic dominance. note, however, that offe reduces each system to an organizing principlethus, maintenance of the economic system is seen by offe as maintenance of the exchange principle. further, as the organizing principle actually refers to processes, the conditions under investigation must also be processes. thus, offe's object is made up by the processes which maintain the dominance of the exchange principle in capitalist society. primary amongst these processes are those involving the noneconomic systems. offe conceptualizes the flanking relationships of these systems as being one of either positive or negative subordination. positive subordination concerns: ...the adjustment of the content of those sub-systems not organized and formed by exchange to conform to economic processes. . .(1976: 35). negative subordination is a relationship where non-economic systems are related to the economic systems: ...in such a way that they are limited and are insulated from the economic system, without, however, being able to contribute to the content of its ability to function... (1976: 35). negative subordination is not the opposite of positive subordination and is best understood as a relation of exclusion. either type of subordination may be regarded as a system state, i.e. we may analyze inter-system relations and reach a conclusion concerning the type of subordination that describes the system. the dynamic which operates here is called 'system autonomy'. this is the '...partial emanc ipa(t ion) .. .from the relationship of positive subordination' (1976: 48) and refers to the functionally necessary 28 'freedom of system' (my term) which is required for maintenance of economic dominance when the very maintenance is so problematic that processes subject to non-economic principles are required to uphold it. autonomy is a system response to economic instability, its meaning embedded in the economic processes which it functions to maintain. offe's understanding of capitalist society thus rests upon his analysis of the economic processes. . offe argues that economic instability is a product of the developmental tendency f capital accumulation, a process which engenders '...the relative decline in the organizing potential of the wagelabour/capital pattern with regard to the total social labour power ...' (1976: 34). the characteristic instability of the economic system is that it makes its own dominance problematic. the decline of the exchange principle means that less labour is organized as a commodity whereas economic stability depends on labour in this form. a four sector model of labour power utilization illustrates this conclusion (1976: 40). the monopoly, competitive, public, and residual (all other labour power) sectors represent proportions of labour organized according to specific principles. as commodity relationships exist only on the basis of exchange offe argues that only in the monopoly sector is labour power organized solely on the basis of that priniciple. the dependency of the competitive sector (made up mainly of firms which are integrated with the monopoly sector via, for example, input or output dependency) on the monopoly sector means that the vast proportion of its labour power is organized on the basis of administered decisions rather than exchange. as the state sector cannot make reference to the market (as its services are not marketable as commodities) offe concludes that labour power is here organized 29 on the basis of administered decisions while the dependence of the residual sector (eg. welfare, schools, etc.) on the state sector means that its proportion of labour power is also administered. offe's point is that the expansion of the monopoly sector causes more and more labour to be administered. the systemic response is the autonomy of the political system. however, because of its specific organizing principle (i.e. power) political intervention is, in itself, a cause of de-commodification as it requires utilizing labour on the basis of power rather than exchange. due to the nature of its flanking relationship, offe can argue that : . . .what the state protects and sanctions is a set of rules and social relationships which are pre-supposed by the class rule of the capitalist class. the state does not defend the interests of one class, but the common interest of all members of a capitalist class society (1975a: 139). the state then is defined not as a set of institutions but in terms of '...the way it is functionally related to and dependent upon the accumulation process' (1975a: 125). this functional relation excludes the state from direct participation in production processes but mandates the state to create the conditions of accumulation. as this functional relation is also an historical one offe can cast the question of the rise of state intervention as one of 'modes' of intervention. the modes of intervention are 'allocative' and 'productive' (1975a: 128). allocative strategies are policy measures which stabilize accumulation by use of strictly political resources, i.e. the state allocates resources which are under its direct control (eg. education policy, trade tariffs, etc.). in pursuing productive strategies the state takes direct responsibility for the provision of inputs required by the accumulation process in the case where units of the economy will 30 not undertake production of the input because of low profit potential (1975a: 128-132). the difference between the two modes of intervention is that for productive intervention: ...what is needed in a given situation is not already at the disposal of the state but must be 'produced' by the state in the first place. the state-owned resources... are...merely the raw materials out of which certain outputs have to be manufactured according to decision rules ...that the state cannot take from its environment but has to generate for itself (1975a: 134). but as the state can only operate as a political entity we can say that its economic intervention must meet conditions defined by the economic system. the state must, because it is not a capitalist enterprise, direct its economic related activities on the basis of a defined'general capitalist interest*. the content of this definition is the forum of state/capitals conflict. the distillation oi a general capitalist interest from the narrow interests of individual capital units is seen as a question of policy determination. the concept of 'system selectivity' allows offe to conceptualize the nature of the capitalist state as a question of policy formation. 'selectivity' refers to a set of 'filtering mechanisms' which, in their functioning, result in '...the systematic restriction of the scope of possibility...' of the policy process (1974: 37). offe argues that the selectivity of the state structure is such that only interests which correspond to the state-defined 'general interest' are allowed representation (1974: 34). as a corollary of this, anti-capitalist interests are denied articulation (1974: 38). capitalist interest is guaranteed by the conditions of interest representation. to be articulated in the political arena, a group 'need' must meet two conditions: it must be capable of conflict (i.e. it must 31 have a collective ability for refusal to perform), and it must also be capable of being organized. the ultimate effect is that groups with access to large amounts of resources have a better chance of gaining interest representation (1972: 85-87). thus: the pluralistic system of organized interests excludes ...all articulation of demands which are general in nature and not associated with any status group; that are incapable on conflict because they have no functional significance for the utilization of labour power, and that represent utopian projections beyond the historically specific system, (1972: 89). offe's intent is to define the nature of the class state, not of the state ruling in response to external demands, and it is argued that such a difference may be explored in the selectivity which results in policy generation. this is why the concept of selectivity has the status of a set of hypotheses for offe. investigation of these hypotheses is, however, problematic because '...state power in capitalist industrial societies is the method of class rule whijh does not disclose its identity as such' (1974: 46); thus, concealment of the state's relation to the accumulation process is seen as one of the pre-conditions of the capitalist state. this 'concealment' is revealed only in 'crisis' situations, i.e. in those situations where the state acts directly and incontrovertibly as a class state. offe's functional definition of the state illustrates this. as the state has the role of maintaining both the legitimacy of the overall system and directing the economy offe argues that these two roles are contradictory in terms of their effects on system stability. while 'direction' is subject to external demands (demands from individual capitals, sectors of capital, and other pressure groups), the attainment of legitimacy involves the fulfilling of specific demands (to a greater or lesser extent), i.e. policies are created which do not 32 satisfy everyone. thus, the contradiction is that meeting demands will cause groups whose demands are not met to withhold legitimacy (1973: 245-248). the state's problem is balancing these two roles. the conditions of the balance are: ...achieved if (a) the acceptance of legitimating rules of democratic and constitutional regimes is reinforced by the material outcomes of governmental policies and measures, and (b) if these measures and policies are 'efficient' in the only way a capitalist state can be efficient, namely in succeeding to provide, to restore, and to maintain commodity relations for all citizens and for the totality of their needs (1973: 252). thus, legitimacy is tied to the attainment of economic stability. further, legitimacy is now a function of the commodity form as the method by which the state can gain legitimacy is dictated by the state's relation to economic processes. we can now appreciate the logic behind offe's statement that: 'the commodity form is the general point of equilibrium for the capitalist state'. (1975a: 140) we are also in a position to appreciate offe's ideas regarding subordination, system autonomy, and the intrusion of foreign organizing principles. because of its functional role the state faces what offe calls a 'crisis of crises management'. offe presents an illustrative diagram: * regulatory welfare ^^ services state economic political/ normative system administrative system system fiscal ^ ^ mass absorption *^ ^ loyalty (1976: 52) 2 the problems which the state must 'balance' are 1) maintaining the balance of input/output within each separate system, and 2) maintaining the balance of the system as a whole (1976: 53), 33 offe's principal argument is that as the state is the central actor in society the social bases of conflict are restructured because of the intrusion of the political organizing principle into the economic sphere. the basic conflicts are now political rather than economic in nature. this may be seen in the dramatic effects of political intrusion on class relationships: as politically manipulable variables now intervene extensively between labour and income, and between the latter and the concrete structures of life chances, the new forms of social inequality are no longer directly reducible to economically defined class relationships which they are assumed to reflect (1972: 95). thus, the real issues of conflict in capitalist society are now derived from the mechanisms of political intervention which generate a '...horizontal system of disparities between vital areas...' (1972: 96) . vital areas are defined as such by virtue of their functional relevance for the accumu^tion process. in late capitalist societies then, a dominance of functions now exists rather than class dominance, and conflict now occurs between groups having differing degrees of 'functional relevance' and not differing relations to the means of production. offe argues that it is this conflict which is the driving force of social change (1972: 98,101) as the 'horizontal privilege distribution' is not necessarily related to class, even if the effects of both class and functional privilege inequality tend to accumulate '...on the lower levels of the income scale' (1972: 102). offe concludes that the final outcome of the functionally required state intervention is the autonomy of the political system from a relation of subordination. the political system has come to dominate the economic system. thus: the decisions and actions which are the output of the labour of the civil service and other categories of employees are no longer deducible from criteria of their relevance for 34 capital accumulation, but, on the contrary, themselves determine exchange relations between commodities (1973: 114) . due to the dominance of political control, the need for legitimacy is amplified. that is, not only must the political system as such be legitimated but also the intrusion of the political into the economic system must be legitimated. capitalist domination is now so bound with the political system that only the legitimacy of the political system makes the domination possible (1973: 74). offe's general thesis of crisis in capitalist society is that: ...the increasing utilization of the regulatory medium of state power a medium external to the market leads, cumulatively, to the production of breaches that enable intrusions into the (economic) system by non-capitalist structures; the closing of these breaches through mechanisms of 'negative subordination' consequently becomes the main problem of late capitalist social systems (1976: 47). the basic problem in resolving this crisis is that its resolution rests on the action of the system (the political) which is responsible for the crisis. critical assessment our critique will first address offe's characterization of crisis 3 in capitalist society ;then, having demonstrated the shortcomings of his approach to the problem,we shall show that offe's economic analysis is seriously flawed by an inadequate understanding of the commodity. we will conclude with a brief discussion of legitimacy and of the political system. that the concept of the commodity is crucial to offe's analysis is proven by (a) the reduction of system stability to economic stability and (b) the reduction of the economic system to the exchange principle, where the 'commodity form' is taken as the indicator of the proper 35 functioning of the principle. we shall now turn to offe's concept of the totality. as we have seen, the totality is conceived as a system composed of three functionally related sub-systems. here we can ask of offe what laclau asks of althusser: 'why only three? what has been the method of their deduction? does there exist any logical link between them?' (laclau, 1975: 104). offe's answer is 'silence to the first two and functional to the third'. offe does not present any reasons as to why there are three systems or why it is these three particular systems. we argue here that the three systems are identified as such as a function of offe's over-riding concern with system crisis. the concept of crisis is the first point of analysis. as offe states: ...one conceptualizes crises not at the level of events but rather at the super-ordinate level of mechanisms that generate events (1976: 32) . offe points out that '...such a definition predisposes one to favour a processual concept of crisis...' as '...crises would be processes which violate the "grammar" of social processes' (1976: 32). the view of crisis as a super-ordinate mechanism is compatible with offe's reduction of all systems to organizing principles; in this usage, crisis becomes the failure of an organizing principle. the concept of crisis is therefore contained within the concept of organizing principle because the principle involves the crisis-prone processes. as the processes must follow the pre-defined functional imperative of economic stability offe has only to define those processes which are of functional importance to the economic system and which are capable of being described as based in an organizing principle. if such a principle can be formulated then, ipso facto , crisis pertains within the processes referred to by the principle. as we can see however, offe is able to do 36 this only for two systems. there are implications here for offe's theory of the state. a tenet of the systems theory employed by offe is that if crisis exists then a 'crisis-resolving mechanism' mast also exist. in offe's work, this mechanism is found in the state. such a view of the state dovetails with a functional definition of the state such as the one used by offe. referring now to the organizing principles we argue that while offe holds that processes are of basic importance in his formulation, the 'logic of crisis' exists only at the level of the principles. however, the derivation of a principle involves not an abstraction of system content (i.e. the processes) but, rather, a reduction of the content to a statement of form. this reduction is severe enough to expel content,* for instance, the reduction of the economic system to the principle of exchange means that offe cannot approach the specificity of capitalism as exchange characterizes any economic system. the reduction is, however, functional for offe's analysis as it facilitates the extension of the idea of crisis to the functional relations between sub-systems. another problem connected to the functional relations of the systems is that in a formal sense either of the two flanking systems can achieve autonomy and so come to dominate the economic system. but the absence of a defined principle of the normative system means that offe cannot account for the hypothetical case of normative system autonomy. offe would argue that the issue here is one of substantive content, the point being that hypothetical problems are best left as such. we agree but offe cannot argue 'content' as a resolution because the problem actually exists in the pre-conditions of his argument, in 37 the reduction to the organizing principle that facilitates the concept of crisis. the point here is that offe's model of capitalist society is based on reductions of content. the reductions lend coherence to the theory but offe is unable to account for the potential relationships which could pertain in the model. if we ask why these potential relationships are not explored the answer will also tell us why the political system has the role described by offe. however, the only answer that offe provides rests upon the assumption of functional necessity and thus the analysis of system relations becomes teleological. turning now to the specific analysis of the economic system we recall that a basic system problem is the tendency for less and less social labour to be organized in the commodity form (where this form is the 'natural' basis of the exchange principle). offe argues that: the pre-requisite for the conversion of ever larger qu?ntities of labour power into the commodity form inherent to the wagelabour relation was, from the emergence of capitalist society, the organization of labour power within a noncommodity form, that is, the existence of the bureaucratic worker (1973: 109). this formulation clearly states the relationship of functional necessity between the political and economic systems. offe holds that capital accumulation is functionally dependent on the state in that the state has the role of '...creating the conditions under which values can function as commodities' (1975: 143). offe's view of the developmental processes of late capitalist societies is that within them '...values cease to operate in the commodity form' (1975: 141). in these societies, the state (upon which the existence of the commodity form is dependent) is not a part of the economic system as it is organized on the basis of a principle foreign to exchange. by virtue of this offe concludes that labour performed 'in' the state is not of the commodity form. 38 in the above formulation, 'noncommodity' labour is a form of labour which is, in some way, not determined by the exchange principle. a closer examination of the 'commodity form of labour' is required here. offe holds that 'commodified' labour is only that labour which is directly productive of surplus value for capital accumulation ,i .e. only labour organized on the basis of the exchange principle exists as a commodity (1973: 109). thus, as the state does not accumulate surplusvalue its 'workers' must not exist in the commodity form. we have located the problem. offe has confused the commodity with productive labour. as laclau points out, the commodity and productive labour (the latter being an aspect of the labour process) are two different sets of abstract conditions of the theory of the capitalist mode of production, and are entirely different theoretical and empirical categories (1975: 106). offe says of state labour power: such labour is not abstract, it is not a commodity and produces no commodities. the social utilization of this kind of labour is determined by its concrete results; it is deployed with regard to its use-value and to the use-value of its performance and not, as is the case of abstract labour, with regard to its exchange value, where use-value is not the primary factor but only a necessary by-product (1973: 109) • here the use-value and the exchange-value of labour as the producer of commodities (which have both use and exchange value) is confused with the use-value and exchange-value of a commodity in itself. offe has totally misunderstood capitalist production. just because labour power is not productive of surplus value does not imply that such labour power does not exist in the commodity form. the 'productivity' of labour is a matter of '...the definite social form, the social relations of production, within which the labour is realized' (marx, 1963: 157). the productivity of labour (that is, productive labour) cannot be 39 identified with the existence of labour power as a commodity because labour power in the capitalist mode of production is a commodity by virtue of the value of labour being a function of socially necessary labour time. offe has missed the crucial role of the relations of production which serve to constitute labour as productive or unproductive of surplus value. we may see this as an effect of the reduction of the economic system, as this reduction dispenses with the concept of relations of production upon which the concept of productive labour rests. therefore, to say 'commodity form of value' and apply the term to the labour force is to state a redundancy and then to look for precise differentiations within it. the real question is (as we shall see) one concerning productive labour, but offe's invalid equation of the commodity and productive labour prevents him from seeing ihis.as he cannot differentiate between the two. returning now to offe's argument regarding system relations, we see that he cannot proceed from an analysis of production as his approach to the economic system expunges production and replaces it with a flawed analysis of the commodity, an analysis which is then incorporated into the functional logic of system relations. we can see the pernicious effects of offe's misunderstanding of the commodity in his model. in offe's usage, for labour to be a commodity it must (a) be directly productive of surplus-value and (b) have its value determined solely on the basis of exchange. this double definition makes it easy to discover a decline in the organizing potential of the exchange principle as any indication that labour value is determined by non-economic forces is sufficient to disqualify that labour from existence as a commodity. 40 labour which is organized through the exchange principle is characterized by the fact that: ...all coercion to which labour power is subjected emanates from an organization with which it is simultaneously linked through the relationship of exchange. .. (1976: 41). to say 'exchange relationships' means that '...all determinants of the individual's chances in life... 1 are based in exchange (1976: 40). as offe says: ...labour power is here incorporated into a relationship of coercion (namely the structure of domination of the large scale industrial establishment) that is in all aspects the object of the exchange relationship. . .here labour power is in all its aspects a 'commodity' and not the object of administrative coercion (1976: 40-41; offe's emphasis) . as offe's argument is that the amount of labour existing in such a relationship tends to decline, a direct implication is that the amount of labour given over to the production of surplus value is declining, the corollary being that the amount of labour which drains surplus value grows. clearly then, offe points to the need of late capitalist societies to increase the amount of surplus value and this is the real issue. offe's concern, because of his usage of the concepts of labour power and the commodity can only approach the question of how many people are producing surplus value. this involves an underutilization (if not misunderstanding) of the concept of surplus value. offe's idiosyncratic understanding of labour power as a commodity makes it easy for him to argue its decline when that understanding is conjoined to the argument that political intervention represents •administrative coercion' and therefore the 'de-commodifi cation' of labour. this coercion refers to the effects of state intervention and alters exchange relationships in that competition is no longer the basis of determination of exchange. thus, in offe's view, the material conditions of exchange are no longer directly linked to exchange. but here offe demonstrates his misunderstanding of the determination 41 of labour value. offe does not imply that exchange relationships no longer obtain; he has correctly identified some of the dynamics of the determination of exchange in late capitalist societies. if we see, following marx, that all labour power is a commodity and that offe is actually dealing with the problem of productive and unproductive labour, then we can see the 'administered coercion' does not alter the nature of value determination. offe, however, thinks that the return to labour is strictly an economic process, hence, the importance of establishing exchange in his analysis. we may conclude that offe utilizes a neo-classical meaning of the economic system. leaving aside the intracacies of marxist economics, we see that the value of labour power is the result of the social process of class struggle, and this process has never been concerned solely with exchange as it is a social as well as an economic process. this calls into question offe's understanding of class and transformation of class struggle. offe states: because the lines of conflict are no longer drawn between classes but between vital areas affecting the same individuals, disjunctions in living standards are no longer a fit basis for the organization of conflicts of broad social relevance (1973: 103). given our demonstration that offe's theory points to the continued importance of the pool of surplus value and that (from marxist theory) surplus depends on productivity, we suggest that offe's contention is misinformed. the surplus value pool is drained through strictly economistic strategies on the part of trade unions. the immediate object of such a strategy is the living standard. as well, in offe's argument, the level of labour process (labour power as a 'commodity') and the level of state/economy relations are mixed. if we are to follow offe's logic to its conclusion then we must say, by virtue of the functional definition of the state, all capitalism 42 is 'de-commodified' . obviously we have the problem of drawing boundaries here. our point is that the simplicity of the reductions employed by offe in order to establish his analysis make the drawing of such boundaries intensely problematic. even if we accept the pssibility of boundaries, certain problems still pertain. for example, a monopoly sector firm may exist by virtue of government contracts. now while the exchange relation may exist within the firm, is this existence not the product of an administrative coercion? further, the boundaries make it impossible to analyse the social determination of labour value; thus even if offe's political economy refers to new forms of the determination of the value of socially necessary labour, he cannot elaborate on these forms because of his concern with the interaction of principles. as mentioned previously, offe sees the attainment of legitimacy (as a minimum of mass loyalty) as the basic problem facing the capitalist state. as our previous lemarks show, offe's analysis does not always deal with what he thinks it does and this is the case for legitimacy. offe holds that legitimation problems arise as a function of state intervention (1975c: 107). as intervention causes the ideology of equivalent exchange to decline (the fetishism of commodities is broken and the new social relations are easily comprehended), a new basis of integration is required to legitimate the intervention. as shown, because of the central ity of the state in the argument, offe reduces legitimacy to the provision of material goods and so turns his theory into one concerned with economic stability—given stability, the legitimacy will, somehow, follow naturally. in this sense, offe treats legitimacy in a'residual' fashion. thus, instead of being the crucial problem we see instead that when offe's economic analysis is combined with his 'basic material level' approach to legitimacy, the problem of legitimacy actually disappears from offe's work. contrary to his own statement, the real problem is one of 43 economic stability. in any case, the concept of legitimacy as such is problematical. offe's normative system does not seem to be an active process in the same way that the economic and political processes are. additionally, given offe's argument about legitimacy and his argument that crisis is seen only in open conflict we can say, following giddens 1 critique of functionalism (1976), that the very operation of the social system indicates that the minimum level of legitimacy is met. thus, the concept and the attainment of the empirical state to which legitimacy refers, is unimportant. even if one accepts offe's analysis to this point, some further problems exist. for example, like the analysis of the economic system, offe's treatment of the political system involves sweeping simplifications. proceeding from his definition of systems and principles, we can ask offe to identify processes within the political system whic'.produce strictly political instability. however, aside from a discussion of policy determination we are not informed as to such processes and must be satisfied with an indication of externally caused political instability (i.e. the instability of the economic system to which the policies are a reaction). in this case, however, apart from being told of the reaction of the political as a system we are, again, not given clarification as to the internal determination of this reaction. symptomatic of this denial of internal processes is the amcept of the state defining a general capitalist interest. we are not told how this comes about and are given only the clue of policy formulation. we suggest that while the concept of selectivity seems fruitful, offe has presented a view of the state which takes the apparent unity as a homogeneity. by this we mean that the processes which operate so as to create, in their apparent unity, the state as such (or in a specific sense, a general capitalist interest) 44 may be sources of conflict (instability?) internal to the state. but because offe begins his analysis with the 'apparent unity' he cannot approach the internal workings and this detracts from his work. conclusion our critique has avoided the supposition that offe is a firmly entrenched member of the critical school. an argument of this nature implies the existence of a clearly defined discourse known as 'critical theory' , whereas at most we can identify a 'critical tradition' and see offe's work as a part of this tradition. the contemporary fount of the critical tradition is, of course, habermas. but our interest here is to analyse the work of offe in and of itself and not to 'locate' offe in relation to habermas. a comparison of the two theorists would have turned a critique of offe into an enumeration of the similarities and differences with habermas. at most we will express our agreement with woodiwiss that habermas' theory of the state (or rather, aspects of habermas' theory of politics) clearly draws upon concepts developed by offe (woodiwiss 1978: 175). nonetheless, a summary of the critical tradition sensitizes us to offe's concerns. generally, critical theory may be seen as a response to the classical marxist emphasis on production at the expense (so perceived) of an analysis of the superstructure. it is argued that historical materialism must be reformulated in order that, for example, political and cultural phenomena may be accommodated. one fashion of establishing this accommodation involves the claim that the transition of capitalism from a competitive to monopoly form has seen the collapse of base and superstructure. in this view, the production process is no longer the locus of the class struggle. the argument is that the class struggle has expanded to encompass all of society. 45 offe's analysis is within this tradition. his object is the change wrought by state intervention into the accumulation process. we may thus see offe as exploring the relations of a totality where the classic base/ superstructure distinction does not pertain. offe may thus be seen as presenting a theory of post-capitalist society (this being quite apropos to his critical school heritage) . offe's conclusions are not, however, linked to his theoretical approach. offe is free to argue that the attainment of a state of negative subordination is the basic problem facing capitalist society but it can be just as easily argued that the system autonomy which offe identifies means that we are beyond capitalist society. if this is so then offe's project of identifying the true class state is virtually meaningless. the issue hangs on the meaning and direction of 'system autonomy'. it is entirely plausible to think that a state of system autonomy will operate in ^ fashion which actually redefines functional imperatives. offe's whole analysis points in this direction but he is prevented from pursuing this argument because his assumption of the nature of economic dominance forces him to view capitalist society as obeying only a particular matrix of functional relations. the problem is twofold. offe's analysis is both ahistorical and abstract; his functional approach can be applied to the soviet union as easily as it is to any capitalist social formation. this is to say that offe's statement of functional relations cannot specifically identify capitalist society. in addition the analysis of capitalism is, as demonstrated, confused and this makes offe's treatment of the outcome of functional relations within capitalist society problematic as a basis of research. we conclude with the observation that offe may be seen as presenting an unsophisticated economic reductionism . offe's political economy is at 46 once simplistic and confused; the integration of historical materialism and systems theory fails miserably because offe's systemic approach to the economy involves stripping the concept of relations of production from the economic . the systems approach requires that a system be seen as somehow insulated from its environment, but the concept of relations of production (which gives coherence to historical materialism) is 'inter-systemic' and cannot, strictly speaking, be used in a systems approach. the use of marx'scategories of political economy in conjunction with a systems approach requires that one or the other be massively simplified. in offe's case, marx is simplified to the point where errors are made which could have been avoided had offe used the concept of relations of production. department of sociology and anthropology/ carleton university notes 1) legitimacy is a source of political power; its nature is one of a minimum loyalty engendered through the normative system (1975a: 126). 2) the rather obvious resemblance to parsons is noteworthy but will not be pursued. our interest in offe's ideas about functional relations lies in his economic reductionism. 3) the basis of critique in this section will be laclau's contention that: a theory is false only to the extent that it is internally inconsistent, i.e. if in the process of construction of its concepts it has entered into contradiction with its postulates. (laclau, 1975: 94) 47 references connerton, p. 1976 giddens, a. 1976 (ed) critical sociology . harmondsworth: penguin. new rules of sociological method . new york basic books. laclau, e. 1975 marx, k. 1963 offe, c. 1972 1973 1974 1975a 1975b 1975c 1976 woodiwiss, t. 1978 "the specificity of the political", economy and society , vol. 4, no. 1. theories of surplus value vol. 1 . moscow: progress publishers. "political authority and class structures", international journal of sociology , vol. 2, no. 1 "the abolition of market control and the problem of legitimacy", kapitalistate , no. 1,2 . "structural problems of the capitalist state", german political studies , vol. 1, no. 1 . 'the theory of the capitalist state and the problem of policy formation", in lindbergh, l. (ed.) stress and contradiction in modern capitalism . lexington: lexington books . "thesis on the theory of the state", new german critique , no . 6 . "comments on muller and neususs", telos , fall . "crises of crisis management: elements of a political crisis theory", international journal of politics , vol. 6, no. 3 . "critical theory and the capitalist state", economy and society , vol. 7, no. 2. 48 microsoft word document3 references acheson, t.w., david frank and james d. frost. 1985. industrialization and underdevelopment in the maritimes, 1880-1930. toronto: garamond press. allen, sheila and carol wolkowitz. 1987. homeworking: myths and realities. london: macmillan education. amin, samir. 1994. re-reading the postwar period. new york: monthly review press. amin, samir. 2004. the liberal virus: permanent war and the americanization of the world. new york: monthly review press. bell, daniel. 1973. the coming of post-industrial society. new york: basic books. braverman, harry. 1974. labor and monopoly capital: the degradation of work in the twentieth century. new york: monthly review press. broad, dave. 1988. “peripheralization of the centre: w(h)ither canada?” alternate routes, vol. 8, pp. 1-41. broad, dave. 1991. “global economic restructuring and the (re)casualization of work in the centre: with canadian illustrations,” review, vol. 14, no. 4 (fall), pp. 555-94. broad, dave. 1995a. “globalization, free trade and canadian labour,” critical sociology, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 19-41. broad, dave. 1995b. “globalization and the casual labour problem: history and prospects,” social justice, vol. 22, no. 3 (fall), pp. 67-91. broad, dave. 1995c. “globalization versus labour,” canadian review of social policy, no. 36 (winter), pp. 75-85; monthly review, vol. 47, no. 7 (december), 20-31. broad, dave. 1997. “the casualization of the labour force,” in ann duffy, daniel glenday and norene pupo (eds.), good jobs, bad jobs, no jobs: the transfromation of work in the 21 st century. toronto: harcourt brace & company, pp. 53-73. broad, dave. 2000a. hollow work, hollow society? globalization and the casual labour problem in canada. halifax: fernwood publishing. broad, dave. 2000b. “the periodic casualization of work: the informal economy, casual labour and the longue duree,” in faruk tabak and michaeline a. crichlow (eds.), informalization: process and structure. baltimore: johns hopkins university press, pp. 23-68, 190-195. broad, dave and wayne antony (eds.). 2006. capitalism rebooted? work, welfare and the new economy. halifax: ferwood publishing. broad, dave and garson hunter. 2009. “work, welfare and the new economy: the commodification of everything,” in norene j. pupo and mark thomas (eds.), interrogating the new economy: restructuring work in the 21 st century. toronto: university of toronto press, pp. 21-42. brym, robert j. and r. james sacouman (eds.). 1979. underdevelopment and social movements in atlantic canada. toronto: new hogtown press. clement, wallace. 1975. the canadian corporate elite: an analysis of economic power. ottawa: carleton university press. clement, wallace. 1977. continental corporate power: economic linkages between canada and the united states. toronto: mcclelland and stewart. ecc (economic council of canada). 1990. good jobs, bad jobs: employment in the service economy. ottawa: economic council of canada. ecc (economic council of canada). 1991. employment in the service economy. ottawa: economic council of canada. frank, andre gunder. 1980. crisis: in the world economy. new york: holmes & meyer. frank, andre gunder. 1981. crisis: in the third world. new york: holmes & meyer. frobel, folker, jurgen heinrichs and otto kreye. 1980. the new international division of labour: structural underdevelopment in industrialized countries and industrialization in developing countries. cambridge: cambridge university press. henwood, doug. 2003. after the new economy. new york: the new press. jackson, andrew. 2009. work and labour in canada: critical issues (second edition). toronto: canadian scholars’ press. klaren, peter f. and thomas j. bossert (eds.). 1986. promise of development: theories of change in latin america. boulder: westview press. kotz, david. 2003. “neoliberalism and the us economic expansion of the ‘90s,” monthly review, vol. 54, no. 11 (april), pp. 15-33. la botz, dan. 2010. “unions representing workers in canada, mexico and u.s. explore merger,” mrzine, http://mrzine.monthlyreview.org/2010/labotz280610.html. loxley, john and salim loxley. 2010. public service, private profits: the political economy of public/private partnerships in canada. halifax: fernwood publishing. mcbride, stephen. 2005. paradigm shift: globalization and the canadian state (second edition). halifax: fernwood publishing. mies, maria, veronoka bennholdt-thomsen and claudia von werlhof. 1988. women: the last colony. london: zed books. olsen, dennis. 1980. the state elite. toronto: mcclelland and stewart. panitch, leo and donald swartz. 1985. from consent to coercion: the assault on trade union freedoms. toronto: garamond press. panitch, leo and donald swartz. 2003. from consent to coercion: the assault on trade union freedoms (third edition). toronto: garamond press. peck, jamie. 1996. work-place: the social regulation of work. new york: the guilford press. porter, john. 1965. the vertical mosaic: an analysis of social class and power in canada. toronto: university of toronto press. portes, alejandro, manuel castels and lauren a. benton (eds.). 1989. the informal economy: studies in advanced and less developed countries. baltimore: johns hopkins university press. pupo, norene j. and mark p. thomas (eds.). 2009. interrogating the new economy: restructuring work in the 21 st century. toronto: university of toronto press. rinehart, james w. 2006. the tyranny of work: alienation and the labour process. toronto: thomson nelson. rosenberg, dorothy. 1991. “the colonization of east germany,” monthly review, vol. 43, no. 4 (september), pp. 14-33. ross, andrew. 2004. no-collar: the humane workplace and its hidden costs. philadelphia: temple university press. ross, andrew. 2009. nice work if you can get it: life and labor in precarious times. new york: new york university press. sassen, saskia. 1994. cities in a world economy. thousand oaks, ca: pine forge press. smith, adam. 1776. the wealth of nations. london: penguin books. tabak, faruk and michaeline a. crichlow (eds.). 2000. informalization: process and structure. baltimore: johns hopkins university press. teeple, gary. 2000. globalization and the decline of social reform: into the twenty first century. toronto: garamond press. vosko, leah f. 2000. temporary work: the gendered rise of a precarious employment relationship. toronto: university of toronto press. wallerstein, immanuel. 1995. after liberalism. new york: the new press. notes 1 to give credit where credit is due, my original alternate routes article began life as a doctoral paper for a graduate seminar led by professor dennis olsen. while absolving him of any blame for the final product, i wish to thank dennis for providing a stimulating educational environment, and will put in a plug for his excellent book the state elite (olsen, 1980), which needs to be ranked along with books by john porter (1965) and wallace clement (1975; 1977) as one of the seminal publications from the carleton school of sociology. 2 the post-world war ii era of the cold war resulted in the terminology of first world to describe the developed capitalist countries, generally found in the northern hemisphere, second world to describe the nominally socialist countries of the so-called eastern bloc, and third world to describe the underdeveloped countries, found mostly in the southern hemisphere. hence the terms north and south are sometimes applied to the first world and third world. dependency theorists have also used the term subimperialism to describe the larger countries of the third world, such as brazil and south africa. world-systems theorists have used the term semi-periphery to describe these countries, which lie between the centre and periphery in economic and political power. some authors (e.g., amin, 2004) now refer to certain countries in africa, which have been largely marginalized from the world economy, as the fourth world. this term has also been applied to the situation of many of the world’s indigenous populations. 3 dependency theorists writing in canada and elsewhere have applied the concept of centre-periphery relations to political-economic relations within as well as between countries. 4 with the breakup of the soviet union in 1989, we witnessed the same process with the re-peripheralization of countries in eastern europe by the west (see, e.g., rosenberg, 1991). 5 in my article i had quoted frobel et al. (1980: 45) as saying that the nidl “should be understood as an ongoing process, and not a final result.” 6 see page 12 of my alternate routes article (broad, 1988). 7 panitch and swartz’ book from consent to coercion: the assault on trade union freedoms was updated and expanded twice, most recently as panitch and swartz, 1993. 8 the child care resource and research unit at the university of toronto is a good source for materials on child day care. see www.childcarecanada.org. 9 the canadian centre for policy alternatives provides useful studies on employment, poverty and other social issues in canada. see www.policyalternatives.ca. 10 the four governments were canada, the united states, australia, and new zealand, but with the subsequent election of a labour government australia ratified the declaration. when resistance isn’t futile | 109 when resistance isn’t futile: understanding canadian labour’s fight for decent pensions — joel davison harden1 in recent years, the canadian labour congress (clc) – the political voice for over 3.2 million union members in english canada – waged a “retirement security for everyone” campaign. at the core of the campaign were three demands: doubling future canada pension plan (cpp) benefits; eliminating retiree poverty; and creating a federal insurance system for workplace pensions. from 2009-2010, the campaign was the top priority for canadian unions with most allocating significant attention and resources to the effort. many consider this the best work canadian unions have done since the “free trade” battles of the late 1980s (wilson, 2011). during the height of the clc’s pension campaign, employers and governments were compelled to acknowledge union perspectives. important legislative reforms were introduced while thousands of ordinary union members shared common demands articulated through their own experience. this article describes how the campaign took shape, and its lessons for progressive strategy. of any, the importance of bottom-up, inclusive activism was reinforced by this example, far more of which must happen if unions want effective anti-austerity campaigns in tough political conditions. despite the many challenges facing unions, effective resistance isn’t futile with an educated, empowered, and confident union membership. there are four distinct phases to the clc’s pension campaign explored here. the first involved the years preceding the 2008 financial crisis when unions were hamstrung by an expert-led focus on pension 1 joel davison harden is an ottawa-based writer and activist. he was the previous registrar of the labour college of canada, and director of the labour education department at the canadian labour congress. i sincerely thank the following reviewers who offered helpful advice and comments: alan zuege, govind rao, rebecca schein, and ingo schmidt. any mistakes that remain are mine alone. 110 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism issues, and stymied by a stalemate in canada’s pension debate. this period then gave way to a second “discovery phase” from 2006-2008 as the clc grappled with the complexity of pension issues on the one hand, and the need for inclusive pension activism (of relevance to union and non-union workers) on the other. by the autumn of 2009, with an effective campaign in place, the clc entered into a third “capacity development phase” where hundreds (perhaps thousands) of activists received training on pension issues. once a critical mobilization point was achieved, substantial momentum developed for pension reforms, with a wide array of observers crediting the clc for driving the discussion. by the end of 2010, however, the clc pension campaign entered a tough fourth phase of limited opportunity for activism on pension issues. a key factor was the federal government’s decision to withdraw interest in cpp expansion, but the clc also suffered from a drop in bottom-up pension activism. what follows is an attempt to grasp the lessons learned over the entirety of these four campaign phases. canada’s pension stalemate ends (2005-2006) the years preceding the clc’s pension campaign are best understood against the “tech wreck” of 2000-2002, when dot com firms became investor nightmares. robert brown, an actuary and academic from the university of waterloo, reflected on canada’s pension debate at the height of this crisis. his conclusion was instructive: the key issue in canada was an unwillingness from unions to exchange defined benefit (db) workplace pensions for individual account arrangements (2001). the biggest reason was the simplicity and security of db plans, which allowed workers to predict their future pension based on years of service, best average or career salary, and a certain percentage of earnings. with this in mind, the rest of this article refers to db plans as “decent pensions”, unlike rrsps, 401k’s, or so-called “defined contribution” plans where retirement benefits are based on the performance of pension investments and prevailing interest rates at the moment of a worker’s retirement. db pensions are decent because of the pension promise that underpins them; benefits, at least in theory, are predictable, and union negotiators were reluctant to let them go (though some felt compelled to make that choice). as a result, the number of workers covered by db plans in canada, unlike other countries, increased from the mid 1970s to 2004 (even as the percentage of workers enjoying db plans dropped by 7 percent from 1992 to 2005) (statscan, 2005; townson, 2009). a major source of db plan growth came from women in the canadian public sector. when resistance isn’t futile | 111 by 2004, bob baldwin – then a clc pension specialist – wrote about a stalemate produced by these conditions (2004). one end of this stalemate was the failure of pension industry lobbyists to succeed in major campaigns of privatization. in the 1990s they had campaigned unsuccessfully to transform the cpp/qpp into a system of individual accounts. industry lobbyists took a further hit when the tech wreck devastated pensions, particularly market-linked individual accounts. it was hardly a time to suggest that canadians should fend for themselves. but if conditions were not ideal for canada’s pension industry, they were more troublesome for unions. by 2005, a third of workingage canadians (18-64) had no personal retirement savings, and only 30 percent contributed to registered retired savings plans (or rrsps, the canadian version of the american 401k) (statistics canada: 2006). of the 17 million workers in paid employment in 2005, almost 11 million (or 62 percent) were not part of any workplace pension plan (statistics canada, 2005). organized labour had negotiated pensions for union members, but decent coverage had not spread widely outside the public sector. by 2005, barely 20 percent of private sector workers had decent pensions, and this had much to do with the growth of precarious, non-union work, and the stalled position of union organizing in general. this regrettable situation posed major problems for unions’ intent on advancing the progressive side of canada’s pension debate. the pension industry was first in attempting to break this stalemate. in the summer of 2005, the association of canadian pension management released a paper entitled back from the brink: securing the future of defined benefit pension plans (acpm, 2005). its key demand was control of the surplus that accrued on a yearly basis when pension investments performed well, and a call for less stringent pension funding rules. without question, these arguments were made at an opportune time. by 2005, the u.s. housing market was in full stride, and finance capital was building a new speculative bubble. in 2005 and 2006, as employers sought control of pension surplus, this bubble was peaking. any financial organization (or employer with the access to pension fund investments) was freeing up available cash to get in on the game, either through listed trades on stock markets or via the shadow banking system of over-the-counter derivatives trading (blackburn, 2007). the fight over pension funding and surplus was therefore a fight over a lucrative source of profit, among the most generous in all of global capitalism. what frustrated canadian employers were regulations and court rulings that made ownership of pension surplus unclear, and therefore 112 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism subject to extensive legal battles. in a unionized environment, collective bargaining agreements often specified ownership of pension surplus be negotiated or shared. it faced a similar challenge in efforts to weaken pension funding rules. by 2005, unions were in no mood to offer that consent, and politicians were nervous about being perceived as advocates of an insecure pension system. nonetheless, the intensity of the moment forced governments to intervene, and facilitate discussion on this issue. in november 2005, the canadian federal government hosted a “work to retirement roundtable” at wilson house (where the meech lake accord constitutional negotiations were once held in 1987). what transpired there spoke to the status of canada’s pension debate. following a brief introduction by federal government facilitators, both union and industry leaders staked out positions. employer executives wanted more “fairness” and “flexibility” to facilitate the growth of decent pensions. union leaders insisted that meant strengthening (not weakening) the existing pension system, notably the well-being of db plans. government facilitators looked on with increasing unease – there was no clear consensus on the key issues. both sides were dug in, with no apparent appetite for compromise. industry was attempting to break the 2004 stalemate, but unions were not budging. at the same time, the stalemate was already unraveling under the force of other pressures. in the private sector, many employers were following through on threats to convert db plans into less secure arrangements. the cost of public sector worker pensions was (and remains) a frequent source of banter among the usual pundits. to effectively counter these attacks, the clc needed a vision for change that could compete with the industry-employer view, and unite a broad coalition for progressive reform. but first, the clc needed its own analysis of the pension industry, and a better sense of the industry’s role in the architecture of global capitalism. as the next section explains, a series of important research discoveries would allow this to happen. 2006-2007: the clc in discovery mode on pensions starting in early 2006, research surfaced which undermined industry arguments, and helped clarify the clc’s positions in canada’s pension debate. since the acpm’s back from the brink paper, industry lobbyists claimed (to some degree of success) that funding rules restricted the growth of decent pensions. curiously enough, an article for an industry magazine, the pensions and benefits monitor (by greg hurst, an influential pensions consultant from vancouver), demolished this position (2006). when resistance isn’t futile | 113 what stood in the way of decent pension coverage, hurst argued, were employers who viewed pension plans as “cash management tools”. in the 1980s and 1990s, high interest rates generated huge windfalls for pension funds, often to the point where most were fully funded from investment returns alone. in these situations, pension rules in canada allow employers to pursue “contribution holidays”, an unfortunate practice that continues to this day. research from elsewhere confirmed hurst’s analysis. quebec’s pension regulator has estimated that over $2.9 billion was taken in contribution holidays by employers from 1991 to 2000 (gold, 2006). bernard dussault, the former chief actuary of the canada pension plan from 1992-1998, insists this led to the hobbled funding condition of pension plans in general, and their lack of preparation for the leaner years of 2001-2003 and 2008 (2009). thanks to contribution holidays, employers did not maintain a “rainy day” fund to cushion the blow of market slumps. instead, they could redirect pension surplus for other purposes – the details for which will never be known. hurst painted a picture that did not fit with the industry’s explanation, and it gave rise to lively debate in progressive circles. union researchers soon questioned whether “cupboard is bare” arguments by employers on pensions had any merit, and they quickly found grist for their mill. in april 2006, non-financial employers enjoyed a “net lending position” (or balance sheet surplus) of $80.6 billion, and the international monetary fund documented a similar trend worldwide (tomas, 2006; cardarelli et al, 2006). two years later, a report from desjardins securities, a financial services firm, explained canadian employers had operating profits 18.3 times the size of their pension liabilities (gibson et al, 2008). an averagesized employer, the report argued, could pay down pension liabilities with just one to two months of profit, or a year’s worth of operating cash flow. the april 2006 issue of benefits canada (a widely-read industry magazine) noted the pension industry had grown to a size of $1.3 trillion, larger than the total of all goods and services sold in canada the previous year (cakebread, 2006). the following month, a british study posed more ambitious questions. according to the authors, the industry push for pension privatization (in canada and elsewhere) was part of a more ambitious effort: “pension privatization is not really about pensions at all, but about extending capital markets, the free movement of capital, and changing the role of the state. the philosophy of [pensions] has changed over the twentieth 114 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism century because politics has changed ... the critical issue is not a choice between the state and the private sector, nor the precise balance between a basic pension and a supplemental one, nor non-funding versus funding, nor general taxation versus contributions based on income. instead, it is the question of whether financial institutions, financial markets and the “free movement of capital” should play leading roles in social welfare. debates about pensions cannot ignore the effects pension schemes have on relationships between finance and industry, investment, and the broader social and economic implications of the stock-market approach to welfare or social security.” (minns and sexton, 2006, p.35-36). robin blackburn, a british historian, took this analysis even further (2007). for him, the attack on decent pensions was not just about creating freer reign for global finance, it was primarily an attempt to restore employer profitability which had gradually slipped since the mid-1970s. if employers and finance executives could access retirement savings, these substantial funds could be diverted to the lucrative paper chase of stock traders and ticker boards. empowered by a new political context, employers could siphon off money meant for pensions to invest in various financial products, earning a tidy sum in the process. over time, many did precisely this, but the perks were temporary if employers remained on the hook for a workers’ pension. hence the industry-employer preference to close decent pensions, and opt for schemes where workers bear the risk of market slumps. seen in this light, the attack on decent pensions was part of what blackburn called the “financialization” of capitalism in general. in the course of a few short decades, pension funds were no longer sources of “patient capital”, facilitating the lending of money to create investment and jobs. instead, in a relatively short period of time, they became enmeshed in a paper chase where rampant speculation and fee extraction trumped reasonable judgement. as this happened, precious little went to genuine economic expansion, or what jim stanford has called the “real economy” (1999; 2008). in fact stanford explains that, at the height of recent financialization, every dollar of investment in real production was eclipsed by a hundred dollars in pure speculation (stanford, 2008). such speculative activity was permitted by loose financial regulation in us stock markets, the heart of the system. stock traders and ticker boards, propelled by the heavyweights of global finance, were ballooning a bubble of massive proportions, and often using workers’ retirement savings to supply the hot air. the attack on pensions, while when resistance isn’t futile | 115 profitable, also had the additional benefit of disciplining unions, and taking back much of the postwar compromise in which workplace pensions emerged. soon enough, as the clc grasped this bigger picture, they began challenging the framework for pension discussions in general. in a submission to finance canada on pension reform, clc president ken georgetti made this explicit: “in a letter to minister flaherty dated march 27, 2005, i expressed the clc’s deep regret that the federal review of defined benefit pensions was taking place in a context where corporate lobbyists were guiding the discussion. this has been confirmed in recent months with the government’s proposed [pension funding] regulations, which read like a wish list for the pension industry. the federal debate on defined benefit pensions – and retirement security for all canadians – must be refocused, and reflect the cooperative values most canadians share. in the twenty-first century, after eight decades of federal pension policy, it should no longer be acceptable for any working canadian to retire into insecurity. a secure, enjoyable retirement should be the reward for decades of contributions to one’s community and canada’s economy.” (georgetti, 2006, p.7). at a federal government “pension policy dialogue” in 2007, the clc also came out swinging. why should unions, they asked, take hits in pension rights after years of employer contribution holidays? why should consumers be charged ridiculous fees (so-called “management expense ratios”) for the mutual funds sold by canada’s financial sector (see: korma et al, 2006)? and, above all, given most workers are without decent pensions or significant retirement savings, what is the government’s vision to ensure retirement security for everyone? the clc soon realized that power brokers were ignoring such questions. instead, debate remained focused on one thing: closing decent pensions, increasing employer access to pension surpluses, and weakening pension funding rules. at government pension consultations in 2006-2007, these objectives were repeatedly sought. finance minister jim flaherty wrote to the congress of union retirees of canada responding to their concerns about canada pension plan benefits. at that time, minister flaherty insisted the cpp status quo was acceptable, and that current contribution rates “will remain unchanged” (2007). the letter confirmed what the clc already knew: in 2007, there was little appetite to expand the modest cpp benefits available to all in paid employment. 116 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism given these realities, the clc faced tough conditions. it had gone through a valuable discovery phase, gained a broader awareness of pension issues, and expressed it well to reporters and politicians. these interventions made an impact, but they had not shifted the industry and employer framework that defined canada’s pension debate. through polling research, the clc had confirmed union members wanted action on pension reform, but the kind of reform was unclear. most union activists, while an important voice in communities across canada, were not informed players in the pension debate. given this situation, union leaders and researchers were labour’s political action team, and that limited group ensured less political influence. for that to change the clc needed a “capacity development phase” that could empower union activists to engage in pension activism; this activist core could then recruit others, and apply pressure to waverers and opponents. but for that to happen, a clear and compelling vision was required. if this was done well, politicians would face constituent anger (and electoral consequences) for not championing a more adequate, fair and secure pension system. as many have explained, canadian history had seen this happen before, particularly when pensioners were involved (finlayson, 1989; deaton, 1989; morton, 1987). a golden opportunity soon presented itself: the clc had pledged to hold a pension conference in late 2007, and union activists were motivated to participate. but what kind of conference would this be? would it feature technical workshops of use to pension specialists, or a clear and compelling vision for pension reform? between these two choices, unions leaders picked the latter, and at times to the dismay of their pension specialists. the 3rd clc pension conference theme was move forward together or fend for yourself? the future of canadian pensions, and offered a clear indication that labour had grasped the bigger picture. the conference was structured around political demands and aimed to refocus the clc’s pension work. a discussion paper was circulated that prioritized cpp expansion, improved public pensions, and a federal system of pension insurance (clc, 2007). three hundred and thirty-five delegates participated, making it the most successful event the clc had held in some time. all delegates were registered on a “clc pension activism” email list, which proved useful given mobilizations that happened later. one could sense union confidence on pensions was building. debbie marantz, a pension representative for the communications, energy, and paperworkers union, captured this in a report to her executive board: when resistance isn’t futile | 117 “the 3rd annual clc pension conference from november 1 to 3 in ottawa was meant to energize those attending and to assist them in focusing on labour’s campaign to protect pensions and retirement security. and, may i say, for myself and everyone else who had the opportunity to attend, it did that and a lot more.” (2007, p. 5). 2008-2010: crisis and opportunity for labour on pensions by 2008, the clc shifted into action on pensions, and not a moment too soon. in april, the viral impact of wall street’s defective investments was clear, setting off a chain of events well documented by others (ferguson, 2012; mcnally, 2010). the resulting slump, at its worst, caused stock markets to plummet by 52 percent and pension funds worldwide lost $5 trillion usd in assets (over three times the size of canada’s economy in 2008) (oecd, 2009). at first, canada’s federal government denied these problems seeped north of the 49th parallel. in his economic and fiscal update of november 21, 2008, finance minister jim flaherty announced a budget surplus, and prime minister stephen harper speculated about “buying opportunities” in plummeting stock markets (as cited in palmer, 2008). in a further bizarre move, a clawback on party financing was also announced (canceling, among other things, the $1.75 per vote federal political parties had received since 2003) which forced the hand of the government’s opposition. a constitutional crisis followed, with a coalition of opposition parties threatening to oust the federal government from power. to avoid that outcome, the federal government introduced a range of economic measures (which now meant forecasting a deficit of $64 billion) (harper, 2008). among these measures were new rounds of consultations on pension reforms, which the clc rightly saw as an opportunity to advance its agenda for progressive change. after organizing an initial round of public forums on the economic crisis in january 2009, the clc began a nationwide process of pension education sessions empowering union activists to attend federal pension consultations en masse. this proved to be challenging given details for consultations were often released a week before they were held, but the member response was unlike anything the clc had seen in decades. the first consultation took place in ottawa on march 13, 2009, and union activists accounted for most of the 150 people in attendance. this hardly surprised officials who were aware of labour’s focus on pension issues. what shocked them, however, were ideas that came from the front 118 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism of the room. bernard dussault, the chief actuary of the canada pension plan and old age security from 1992-1998, had been invited as an expert to share his thoughts on specific reforms to federally-regulated pension plans. but dussault, a major player in the cpp debates of the 1990s, did not restrict his comments to such narrow parameters. he instead proposed a dramatic expansion of cpp benefits that would eventually see all canadians earn 70 per cent of their salary in retirement (dussault, 2008). it was a case to shift the canadian pension system to a “medicare” model, and away from its largely “fend for yourself” design. the direct losers would be banks and financial services companies who would almost certainly forego rrsp clients. dussault’s vision shook the pension establishment, and labour now realized it had a powerful ally in the case for pension reform. as the consultations moved to six other canadian cities, halls were filled with angry union members and retirees. soon after, a conference room in halifax meant for eighty participants was swamped by 150 people. loretta kent, a worker based at av pulp and paper in nackawic, new brunswick, shared one of many compelling pension stories heard that day. loretta’s employer had declared bankruptcy in 2004 after underfunding the pension plan for five years. as a result, her pension went from 92 per cent funded to 48 per cent funded. when the employer emerged from bankruptcy protection, loretta and her co-workers realized how much they lost given canada’s unfair bankruptcy rules, which rank workers’ pensions at the bottom of an employer’s list of creditors. for loretta, it meant $400 in pension after sixteen years of service. not $400 a month, or $400 a year, but a one-time post-bankruptcy payout of $400 (kent, 2009). after she spoke, the entire room (industry experts included) stood and applauded her courage in sharing this story. in toronto, a room for 150 was packed by over 300 participants. one after another, they berated the government for failing to adequately protect their pensions, and provide decent options for the next generation. as len wallace, a retiree leader for the canadian autoworkers union (caw) spoke, heads nodded around the room: “why should politicians and ceos,” he fumed, “get amazing pension plans, but not fight to ensure everyone else gets the same? what’s the message to young people there? do our kids have to be politicians and ceos to retire with dignity?” (wallace, 2009). in vancouver, a room meant for 225 was filled well beyond capacity, and once again retirees in particular made their presence felt. art kube, past-president of the council of senior citizens organizations of b.c., reminded government officials not to use consultations to delay reform. “consultation is fine, and talking is fine,” kube said, “but we’ve had when resistance isn’t futile | 119 many years of that. we want action. and let me remind you of the obvious: seniors vote and we vote for people who care about pensions. you get this issue wrong, and you could be out of a job” (kube, 2009). the 2009 federal pension consultations confirmed what union leaders had said all along: pension anxiety was wide and deep, and action was required to fix the system. the clc had prepared briefings and materials for union participants in the consultations, and these proved useful for the predictable deflections that came from the front of the room. a joint submission by seven federal employers (employing over 50 percent of all federal sector workers) once again demanded greater access to pension surplus and weaker pension funding rules (air canada et al, 2009). as they made these demands, the pension stories shared by workers and retirees became a powerful source of resistance. it was difficult to seek concessions in rooms filled with people facing an insecure pension future. on april 23, 2009, yet another event added to labour’s pension momentum. following a call from the caw, over 15,000 people demonstrated at the ontario legislature in toronto to “protect our pensions.” rally participants included angry nortel networks workers and pensioners (facing significant concessions from a bankrupt employer), irate caw members, and several concerned citizens who came for their own reasons. a toronto “stewards assembly” held two weeks later (called by the toronto and york region labour council) drew over 1800 participants, from rank and file union stewards and elected union officials, and pensions were a hot topic. the globe and mail – a widely-read newspaper in english canada among intellectuals and policymakers – took close notes at both events, capturing several compelling stories for an influential series than ran six months later (entitled “retirement lost”). union activists realized that politicians could no longer, after bailouts for finance companies in 2008, ignore pleas to fix canada’s pension system. momentum for change was starting to build — pension anger and anxiety had traction in the mainstream press and public mind. in the midst of these opportune conditions, the clc released its latest vision for pension reform (clc, 2009b). its july 2009 discussion paper — entitled adequacy, security, fairness: labour’s proposals for the future of canadian pensions – proposed three core demands: 1. doubling future cpp benefits through a phased-in increase of 60% to worker and employer contributions; 2. a 15 percent increase to the guaranteed income supplement to federal old age security pensions (amounting to a $100 per month boost for low-income pensioners at a yearly cost of $1.2 billion); 120 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism 3. implementing an insurance system to protect workplace pensions should an employer declare bankruptcy, to a value of $2500 per month (pp. 6-8). these demands formed the backbone of the clc’s retirement security for everyone campaign launched on september 7, 2009, and elements of this vision were soon evident well beyond progressive circles. on september 11, 2009, the provinces of saskatchewan, alberta and british columbia threatened to “go it alone” on pension reform in the absence of coordinated action from ottawa, and referenced cpp reform among other options (d’alliesio, 2009). on september 15, the financial post ran a lead story entitled “pensions loom as election issue” that featured angry nortel retirees, and quoted clc chief economist andrew jackson on labour’s plan to expand the cpp (mazurkewich, 2009). the following day, david dennison, president and ceo of the cpp investment board (cppib), commented on the public debate over the fund’s future (dennison, 2009). the cppib had usually restricted its public relations to investment issues, but dennison confirmed the depth of canada’s pension problems, and acknowledged a range of potential cpp reforms (including the clc’s proposal). on october 16, the globe and mail’s “retirement lost” was released, beginning with these words: “canadians can no longer assume they will retire with security. many are seeking increasingly scarce work while others flail as their onceflush retirement accounts hemorrhage. a globe and mail series beginning today shows that the crisis in canadian pensions is not looming; it is here, and has been for some time. a concerted national effort, involving changes in policy, behaviour and mindset from governments, businesses, unions, pension overseers and individual canadians, is needed to repel the crisis.” (mcnish et al., 2009). a week later, over three thousand nortel workers and retirees joined union activists on parliament hill, demanding justice for a company once thought to the jewel of canada’s “silicon valley north”. earlier that month, nortel ceo mike zafirovski appeared before the house of commons finance committee, and was forced to account for demanding a 30 percent reduction in pensioner cheques while authorizing a $45 million bonus plan for top executives (cbc, 2009). this was a “hairshirt” moment for corporate canada, and the clc did much to publicize the exuberant heights to which executive pay and pensions had soared. when resistance isn’t futile | 121 politicians promised reforms due to an unrelenting wave of negative publicity, mobilizations, and appeals for change. after being ignored or dismissed by the pension establishment, the logjam that kept progressive options off the table had been broken. almost immediately, canada’s federal political parties began jostling for position on pension issues. the new democratic party and bloc quebecois supported the clc’s demands, while the liberal party proposed an expansion of the cpp through a private sector model. the ruling conservatives, however, were cool to any ambitious plans. reacting to the liberal proposal, federal finance minister jim flaherty accused his opponents of a “knee-jerk reaction to a serious issue”, while his staff warned against policy ideas that might “saddle taxpayers with big obligations” (cited in chase, 2007). this was the first sign of a counter-attack to the clc’s new momentum on pensions, with more to come soon. as provincial, federal and territorial finance ministers prepared to meet in december (in whitehorse, yukon territory), similar appeals continued from government reports and spokespersons. jack mintz, a public policy professor based at the university of calgary, wrote a report for the whitehorse meeting which emphasized the strength of the existing pension system (2009). bob baldwin, the former pension clc expert, produced a study for the ontario government which downplayed ambitious reform, preferring instead to suggest “key subordinate questions”, and hint at “mixing and matching” various policy ideas (2009, p. 76, 78). “fend for yourself” advocates seized on the ambiguity produced by these claims. the canadian bankers association released a paper calling for raised rrsp limits (2009), while the c.d. howe institute published a study attacking federal public service pensions (using, critics charged, questionable assumptions to balloon the perceived costs) (laurin and robson, 2009). david dodge, former governor of the bank of canada, likened an expansion of the cpp to a “nanny state solution”, and urged finance ministers to embrace policy options that allow “choice” in retirement planning (as cited in scoffield, 2009). these arguments gave politicians an excuse to deflect appeals for substantial reform, but they confirmed the clc’s pension campaign had traction. the province of british columbia said as much through its own independent study (also shared with finance ministers) that discussed cpp reform in positive terms (2009). nevertheless, the whitehorse talks ended with no commitment to reform, and most space given to dismissals from mintz and others. the positive outcome was a pledge 122 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism to hold further public hearings, leave “no policy option off the table”, and articulate a clear direction on pension reform at the next finance ministers meeting in june 2010. if whitehorse was a tough moment for the clc campaign, it was also clear that momentum for progressive options had not stalled. in fact, the clc’s lesson from whitehorse was that more grass-roots mobilization was needed to push politicians in the right direction. so, from january to april 2010, the clc worked with others in organized labour to host large pension forums, many of which invited attendees to share their own pension anxieties and concerns. the anger expressed at these forums generated more political action as labour activists pressed local politicians, held rallies and occupied constituency offices of pension industry supporters. this second wave of bottom-up pension activism quickly morphed into a movement for pension justice. the movement’s climax happened in march 2010, when the clc and ontario federation of labour hosted a “pension summit” in toronto that offered space to divergent perspectives to debate the way forward. almost six hundred delegates attended, including federal finance minister jim flaherty, canadian federation of independent business ceo catherine swift, pension consultant keith ambachtscheer, and influential employer-side actuary malcolm hamilton. these voices, unlike usual, did not dominate the proceedings. union delegates posed tough questions, and soon realized how brittle the “fend for yourself” establishment was. it was a moment where organized labour discovered a sense of its power, and one could feel received wisdom starting to shift. incredibly, this shift was also on display a month later at an elite pension conference hosted by jack mintz at the university of calgary. ken georgetti was invited to speak on a panel with industry heavyweights (who, we can presume, were expected to lay waste to the clc pension campaign). but when robert brown (a former top executive for price waterhouse coopers) spoke after georgetti, he told a stunned audience that expanding the canada pension plan was likely the “best of all available options” (georgetti, personal interview, 2010). georgetti nearly tumbled from his chair, and that reaction was modest compared to mintz’s gaping jaw. without question, the clc notched a minor victory in the heart of canada’s conservative policy establishment. in june, this was followed by a resolution passed at the federation of canadian municipalities convention, where delegates when resistance isn’t futile | 123 (including the mayors of canada’s large cities) backed he clc’s call to expand the cpp. the call for pension reform was making an impact at the highest official levels of canadian politics. this was confirmed in june 2010 when federal finance minister jim flaherty announced a new consensus among his colleagues for pension reform. the policy direction, he argued, would involve a “modest expansion of the canada pension plan”, while encouraging the financial sector to offer new retirement savings products (as cited in curry, 2010). alberta stressed its objections to the cpp reform, but it emerged as a lone voice doing so (with, perhaps, some support from right-leaning saskatchewan as well). union activists celebrated the result, and took pride in creating an historic moment in canada’s long-running pension debate. the rest of the summer, however, was unkind to organized labour. by the time union activists returned for labour day weekend, cpp reform was sputtering in the top levels of the federal government. in november, the federal government unveiled legislation enabling pooled registered pension plans (prpps), the latest “fend for yourself” policy option (department of finance, 2010). prpps would be voluntary in nature, and did not even require employer contributions. critics from across the political spectrum argued prpps would do little to expand the scope of workplace pension coverage. the clc fumed about prpps receiving higher priority than cpp reform, and this fact was confirmed a month later when prime minister stephen harper confirmed the latter was officially off the table. “canadians”, harper insisted, “are looking for options ... not a hike in their cpp premiums” (as cited in scoffield, 2010). the union reaction was furious: flaherty’s constituency office was occupied by enraged protesters, and the clc would later announce two access-to-information requests aimed at exposing who undermined cpp reform. prior to a meeting of finance ministers in late december, a joint letter from the governments of british columbia, ontario, prince edward island, new brunswick, manitoba, and nova scotia urged the federal government to re-commit to cpp expansion, but this overture was rebuffed by flaherty at a meeting the following week. the window of opportunity evident months earlier was abruptly closed. looking forward: how did it happen? how can it happen again? despite this unfortunate result, the clc’s pension campaign is a good news story in otherwise tough times for unions. as observers sift through the tea leaves of this experience, it will be important to under124 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism stand where the clc’s clout on pensions came from, and how it can be restored. at a time when many question the political capacity of organized labour, this was an example of collective action winning positive results. not mentioned in the above narrative, for example, were legislative changes canadian governments felt compelled to make given widespread pension activism. these included guaranteed wage payouts in the event of corporate bankruptcies, strengthened rights for pension plan members, and guidelines to prevent federal sector employers “walking away” from unfunded liabilities in their pension plans. these were not the specific objectives the clc sought, but significant in their own right, and more than could have been won without any activity at all. they also offer important lessons about what kind of activism is effective in today’s challenging times. the first is the necessity for unions, where possible, to pursue broad and inclusive campaigns. in 2007, the clc made the crucial decision to depart from an expert-led focus on pensions, and embrace demands that bridged the concerns of union and non-union workers. in this vein, the decision to champion cpp reform and public pensions was important; industry critics could not easily criticize unions for being “self-interested”, and non-union workers could be credibly told the clc was fighting for everyone. the opposite would have happened if the focus had been protecting the pensions of unionized workers. such defensive campaigns do not appeal to a wider public grown weary from decades of “fend for yourself” economic policy (in pensions and elsewhere). if organized labour is unable or unwilling to mount broad campaigns, employers will do so, and redirect public anger against “privileged unions”. this is why us labour’s recent pursuit of the employee free choice act was doomed to fail, and the clc learned a similar lesson after a vigorous pursuit of federal “antiscab” legislation in 2007 (harden, 2007). these goals, while important, will not appeal to a broad enough base, and will cater to the perception that unions are driven by self-interest. to regain momentum, unions must demonstrate their capacity to win victories for all workers. this was the first strength of the clc’s pension campaign — it offered a compelling vision of “retirement security for everyone”, and forced opponents to defend a flawed status quo. the second strength of the clc pension campaign was its efforts to harness the fears, energies, and dreams of everyday union members. when it first realized an opportunity to mobilize on pension issues, the clc could have simply presented its spokespersons to “multiwhen resistance isn’t futile | 125 stakeholder” meetings and media opportunities. instead, following the advice of marshall ganz (2001; 2009) and others, the clc did that and much more. it recognized the power of workers’ stories, and invited them into a focused campaign. for that to happen, the clc financed an extensive, two-year process of pension education, at first to intervene in federal government hearings, but later to ensure inspired advocacy took place in every region possible. as clc campaigners criss-crossed the nation, they empowered union members to argue the merits of improved public pensions through the realities of a retiree on their street. the argument for pension insurance, likewise, was articulated locally as a backstop to prevent more nortels, abitibi-bowaters, or av pulp and papers (as referenced in loretta’s story above) from tearing communities apart. the costs of cpp expansion were explained as a sacrifice of a few take-out coffees or magazine subscriptions per month. from these local, accessible perspectives, union activists could speak from a position of strength, recruit supporters, and apply significant pressure to intransigent decision-makers. to this the clc added an array of attractive materials which activists would colour with local stories (which were often more difficult for politicians to dispute). this was a welcome departure from clc’s earlier pension education efforts – intermittent regional courses, and research papers published for a specialist audience. solid research would remain a key element of the campaign, but a newly-mobilized layer of pension activists gave the clc renewed agency on pension issues. this vindicated those who insist that “staffing up” or “hyper-professionalizing” takes unions away from their source of strength: the activism of union members (clawson, 2008). if the grassroots of organized labour take ownership of campaigns, mass participation can happen, and much is possible. if union activists are compelled to act as a stage army, far less enthusiasm can be expected. for genuine success, labour’s rank and file must be the authors of change. relatedly, the need to sustain local activism is third and final lesson from the clc’s campaign and it is likely the most challenging to understand. during the clc’s capacity development phase, it was never clear how bottom-up mobilizations would continue beyond appeals to politicians or mobilizations for various events. and yet, many of the campaign’s most impressive moments came because activists themselves scored blows against the forces of pension austerity. the mass meetings, rallies, and sit-ins happened because union members gained a sense of their power, and focused it against a common adversary. 126 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism by june 2010, an apparent victory (through cpp reform) caused many to think change was coming. the truth, of course, was otherwise — and blame is hard to allocate about why this perception was widespread. the clc leadership urged vigilance following flaherty’s june 2010 announcement, and called on local pressure to “get the job done”. pension activists sent in numerous requests for additional campaign materials and further trainings, many of which came to fruition. however one interprets the federal government’s final decision, they clearly believed that betraying an earlier pledge would not entail significant political consequences. as it happened, this turned out to be true – in canada’s may 2011 federal election, the ruling conservatives won their first majority government. clc supporters (particularly the ndp) also did well, but not well enough to ensure greater adequacy, fairness, and security for canada’s pension system. that weighty task remains, and it is one organized labour must take seriously. if capitalism’s crisis-prone history portends anything, it is more economic slumps and major assaults on the living conditions of workers. when (and not if) that happens, unions must present a vision of change that inspires action, rather like the 99 percent visionaries whose protest encampments challenged the world’s financial elite, or the quebec student movement who (as these words were written) held fast in the face of enormous pressures. canada’s unions, despite their many challenges, can be a similar political force. this is possible, even probable, but only likely with the active involvement of labour’s rank and file; their activism is the best means of ensuring resistance isn’t futile, both for today and numerous battles ahead. references air canada et al. (2009, march 5). joint submission to the department of finance canada on its january 2009 pension plan consultation paper. http://www.fin.gc.ca/consultresp/pdf/040-joint-submissiondepartment-offinance-march5th-final.pdf. allemang, j. (2012, may 2). the sorry state of our unions. globe and mail. p. f1. association of canadian pension management (acpm). (2005). back from the brink: securing the future of defined benefit plans. http://www. acpm.com/resources/7/pdf/acfd2b.pdf bakvis, p. (2005). social security models and the neoliberal challenge. http://library.fes.de/pdf-files/gurn/00019.pdf. baldwin, b. (2004). pension reform in canada in the 1990s. what was accomplished, what lies ahead? ottawa: canadian labour congress. when resistance isn’t futile | 127 baldwin, b. (2009, october). research study on the canadian retirement income system [prepared for the ministry of finance, government of ontario]. http://www.fin.gov.on.ca/en/consultations/pension/ dec09report.html. blackburn, r. (2003). banking on death or investing in life: the history and future of pensions. london: verso. blackburn, r. (2007). age shock: how finance is failing us. london: verso. blackburn, r. (2006, may/june). finance and the fourth dimension. new left review. 39, 39-70. government of british columbia (2009, december). options for increasing pension coverage among private sector workers in canada [report prepared for the steering committee of provincial/ territorial finance ministers on pension coverage and retirement income adequacy]. http://www.fin.gov.bc.ca/pension_plan_options_ paper.pdf. brown, r. (2001). the shift to defined contribution pension plans: why did it not happen in canada? north american actuarial journal, 5(3), 65-77. cakebread, c. (2006, april). top 40 money managers report: trillion dollar baby. benefits canada. http://www.hfconferences.ca/top40/pdfs/ top40reportapril.pdf. canadian bankers association. (2009, november 23). modernizing canada’s retirement savings system. http://www.cba.ca/contents/files/ submissions/sub_20091209_pension_en.pdf. canadian labour congress. (2007). move forward together, or fend for yourself? the future of canadian pensions. http://www. canadianlabour.ca/newsroom/publications/move-forward-togetheror-fend-yourself-future-canadianpensions-3rd-clc-pensi. canadian labour congress. (2009a). response by the clc to the department of finance pension consultation paper. http://www. canadianlabour.ca/sites/default/files/pdfs/2009-03-26-federalpensionreview-en.pdf. canadian labour congress. (2009b). security, adequacy, and fairness: labour’s proposals for the future of canadian pensions. http://www. canadianlabour.ca/news-room/publications/security-adequacy fairness-labour-s-proposals-future-canadian-pension. canadian broadcasting corporation (cbc). (2009, november 26). nortel approves more exec raises. cbc news business. http://www.cbc.ca/ news/business/story/2009/11/26/nortel-raises-document.html. cardarelli et al. (2006). awash with cash: why are corporate savings so high? world economic outlook. new york: international monetary fund. 128 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism chase, s. (2009, october 27). parties square off on federal pension reform: liberals vow they would take a more activist role and expand cpp, tories warn of spiraling costs. globe and mail. http://www. theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/federal-parties-square-off-on pension-reform/article4215126/. chevreau, j. (2009, november 5). canadians get the mers they deserve. financial post.http://www2.canada.com/victoriatimescolonist/news/ business/story.html?id= 1de8b905-d81e-4f4c-a772-f9d296e736ff. clawson, d. (2008). the next upsurge: labor and the new social movements. ithaca, ny: cornell university press. curry, b. (2010, june 13). flaherty pushes for expanded cpp. globe and mail. http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/flahertypushes-forexpanded-cpp/article1602737/. d’aliesio, renata. (2009, september 11). western provinces pitch regional pension program. calgary herald. http://www.canada.com/ vancouversun/news/business/story.html?id=747fca14170d-4de3-9e43982626f37e3d&k=9970. deaton, richard. (1989). the political economy of pensions: power, politics and social change in canada, britain, and the united states. vancouver: ubc press. department of finance, government of canada. (december 2010). framework for pooled registered pension plans. http://www.fin.gc.ca/ activty/pubs/pension/prppirpac-eng.asp. dennison, d. (2009, september 16). the canadian model: moving from affordability to sufficiency [remarks made to the 16h annual conference of social security actuaries and statisticians]. http://www. cppib.ca/files/cppib_speech__issa_conference__sept_16_2009_.pdf. dussault, b. (2009). global solution to the canadian pension crisis: expansion of the cpp. presentation to the department of finance, government of canada, on “federal regulation of private pension plans, ottawa, on, canada. ferguson, c. (2012). predator nation: corporate criminals, political corruption, and the highjacking of america. new york: random house. finlayson, d. (1989). whose money is it anyway? the showdown on pensions. toronto: viking. flaherty, j. (2007, march 18). debate on cpp reform [letter to the congress of union retirees of canada]. ganz, m. (2001, august). the power of story in social movements [presentation to the annual meeting of the american sociological association]. anaheim: california. http://www.hks.harvard.edu/ organizing/tools/files/mg%20power%20of%20s tory.pdf. ——— (2009, march). why stories matter. sojourners. http://sojo.net/ magazine/2009/03/why-stories-matter. when resistance isn’t futile | 129 georgetti, k. (2006, march 16). it’s time to refocus canada’s pension debate [open letter to the hon. jim flaherty, federal minister of finance, government of canada]. gibson, p. et al. (2008). research comment: could a pension crisis be next? an analysis of pension shortfalls in canada and the us. toronto: desjardins securities. gold, m. (2006). current pension issues and trends. http://www.share.ca/ files/current_pension_issues_and_trends_m._gold.pdf. harden, j. (2007, may/june) unions learn from defeat of anti-scab bill. relay, 17, 18-19. harper, s. (2008). sound foundations and open doors: canada’s blueprint for short and long-term success [remarks to the asia pacific economic cooperation ceo conference]. http://www.pm.gc.ca/eng/media. asp?id=2323. harvey, d. (2005). a brief history of neoliberalism. new york: oxford. hurst, g. (february 2006). lies, damned lies, and canada’s private pensions funding crisis. pension and benefits monitor. http://www. bpmmagazine.com/02_archives/2006/february/lies_canada_private_p ension_funding.html. kent, l. (2009, march 21). my story about a/v pulp and paper. presentation to the department of finance, government of canada, on “federal regulation of private pension plans. halifax, ns, canada. korma et al. (2006, may). mutual fund fees around the world. http:// randsco.com/_img/blog/0702/fees.pdf. kube, a. (2009, april 12) oral remarks made to the department of finance, government of canada, on “federal regulation of private pension plans”. vancouver, bc, canada. laurin, a. and robson, w. (december 2009). supersized superannuation: the startling fair-value cost of federal government pensions. backgrounder no 122. toronto: c.d. howe institute. marantz, d. (2007). report from the 3rd clc pension conference [letter to cep national executive board]. mazurkewich, k. (2009, september 15). pensions loom as election issue. financial post, p. a4. mccullough. m. (2009, november 22). why there is no retirement crisis. canadian business. http://www.canadianbusiness.com/article/11403— why-there-is-noretirement-crisis. mcnally, d. (2010). global slump: the economics and politics of crisis and resistance. san fransisco: pm press / spectre. mcnish, j. et al (2009, october 16). beyond the illusion of security. globe and mail. p. f3. 130 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism minns, r. and sexton, s. (2006). too many grannies? private pensions, corporate welfare and growing insecurity. london: the corner house. http://www.thecornerhouse.org.uk/sites/thecornerhouse.org.uk/ files/35grannies.p df. mintz, j. (2009, december 18). summary report on retirement income adequacy research [prepared for he research working group on retirement income adequacy of federal-provincial-territorial ministers of finance]. retrieved from http://www.fin.gc.ca/activty/ pubs/pension/riar-narr-eng.asp. morton, d. (1987). resisting the pension evil: bureaucracy, democracy, and canada’s board of pension commissioners, 1916-1933. canadian historical review, 68(2),199-224. national advisory council on the status of aging (naca), government of canada. (2005). seniors on the margins: aging and poverty in canada. retrieved from http://publications.gc.ca/collections/ collection/h88-5-3-2005e.pdf. organization of economic cooperation and development (oecd). (2009, october). pension markets in focus. issue 6. paris: oecd. retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/30/40/43943964.pdf. palmer, r et al. (2008, october 7). canada’s harper sees possible stock market bargains. reuters. retrieved from http://www. reuters.com/article/2008/10/07/financial-canada-opportunities idusn0747329620081007. scoffield, h. (2009, december 17). cut standard of living now for comfortable pension later: dodge. the canadian press. retrieved from http://www.capebretonpost.com/business/personal-finance/2009-12-18/ article777748/cut-standard-of-living-now-for-comfortable-pensionlater%3a-dodge/1. scoffield, h. (2010, november 17). prpp: ottawa launches new pooled registered pension plans to boost retirement savings. the canadian press. http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2011/11/17/prpp-pooledregistered-pensionplans_n_1099456.html. stanford, j. (2008) economics for everyone: a short guide to the economics of capitalism. toronto: fernwood. stanford, j. (2001). paper boom: why real prosperity requires a new approach to canada’s economy. toronto: lorimer. statistics canada. (2006). survey of financial security. ottawa: government of canada. statistics canada. (2005). pension plans in canada. ottawa: government of canada. tomas, a. (2006). recent trends in corporate finance. canadian economic observer. ottawa: statistics canada. when resistance isn’t futile | 131 townson, m. (2001). pensions under attack: what’s behind the push to privatize pensions. ottawa: canadian centre for policy alternatives. ——— (2009). what can we do about pensions? ottawa: canadian centre for policy alternatives. van riesen, g. (2007, february 12). oral remarks made to the government of ontario expert roundtable on pensions. wallace, l. (2009, april 16). oral remarks made to the department of finance, government of canada, on “federal regulation of private pension plans, ottawa, on, canada. wilson, f. (2011, may 27). how the ndp gave unions a new opportunity to organize. rabble.ca. http://rabble.ca/blogs/bloggers/fwilson/2011/05/ how-ndp-gavecanadas-unions-new-opportunity-organize. | 147 québec solidaire: a québécois approach to building a broad left party richard fidler1 a number of attempts have been made in recent years to launch new parties and processes, addressing a broad left or popular constituency, that are programmatically anti-neoliberal if not anti-capitalist, some of them self-identifying as part of an international effort to create a “socialism of the 21st century.” they vary widely in origins, size, social composition, and influence. the process has gone furthest in a number of latin american countries; among the best known are the united socialist party of venezuela (psuv), led by hugo chávez, and the bolivian movement towards socialism–political instrument of the sovereignty of the peoples (mas-ipsp), led by evo morales. efforts in western europe, such as italy’s refoundation party, germany’s die linke, or france’s parti de gauche originated in part in splits in the traditional parties of “20th century socialism,” in avowed rejection of both stalinism and social democracy. many of these parties include members who in the past were associated with one or another of the marxist currents identified historically with trotsky’s anti-stalinist legacy. in france, the nouveau parti anti-capitaliste (npa) was initiated under their aegis. parallel developments have not yet occurred in the united states or canada, where anticapitalist ideas and movements have less presence in the political landscape today than they had a century ago. however, as it does in so many respects, quebec constitutes something of an exception. a new left party, québec solidaire, created during the past decade, is attracting considerable interest and growing support as an anti-neoliberal alternative to quebec’s three capitalist parties. while not explicitly anti-capitalist or socialist, it defines itself 1  richard fidler is an independent researcher and writer who publishes the blog life on the left (www.lifeonleft.blogspot.com). he is based in ottawa and can be reached at: rfidler_8@ sympatico.ca. thanks are due to john riddell and david mandel for their critical comments on an earlier draft. the usual caveats apply. québec solidaire: a québécois approach to building a broad left party 148 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times as a party “resolutely of the left, feminist, ecologist, altermondialiste,2 pacifist, democratic and sovereigntist.” this paper will outline how this party originated, describe how it functions, and explore some major challenges it faces and how it is confronting them. the quebec exception quebec’s political evolution has always followed a distinct trajectory within the canadian social formation. a crucial determinant has been the province’s character as the homeland of a distinct nation, with its own territory, language, culture, historical tradition and a well-defined national consciousness as a minority people within canada and north america. until well past the mid-20th century, french-canadian nationalism was essentially defensive, focused on protecting the autonomy of quebec, the last major enclave of the francophone presence in canada, against involvement in imperialist wars and the increasing encroachment on the province’s constitutional jurisdiction by the federal state with its expanding economic and social functions. industrialization and the concomitant urbanization and growth of trade unions aggravated these tensions, disrupting the social and political culture of a francophone population long dependent on church and parish for the provision of basic social and community services. in the 1960s a new, more assertive nationalist dynamic gained force as quebec rapidly moved to modernize its industrial infrastructure, nationalized hydro-electric power resources and expanded and secularized its education, health and social welfare systems. a large provincial state bureaucracy developed, increasingly directed to stimulating the expansion of a skilled labour force and the growth of a francophone bourgeoisie through the provision of financial and other assistance. quebec pushed increasingly — but unsuccessfully — for constitutional changes that would give it greater autonomy within the federation, especially in areas crucial to its national identity and development. union membership expanded exponentially. a veritable cultural revolution occurred with the appearance of many new radical publications and other media, many of them raising the demand for quebec autonomy, political sovereignty or independence. on the left, pro-independence movements sprouted, their members inspired by the post-war afroasian decolonization and, closer to home, the socialist ideology of the cuban revolutionists. 2  in french, those who advocate “another world” of global justice and solidarity. | 149 national consciousness and class consciousness have maintained a close and reciprocal relationship in quebec in recent decades. but this social ferment, both a product and promoter of rising québécois national consciousness, largely bypassed the parties of the existing “20th century” canadian left. their historical failure to sink mass roots in quebec was directly related to their programmatic orientation toward strengthening the canadian state and their indifference to quebec’s national oppression and/or hostility to québécois nationalist sentiment. the regina manifesto, the founding document of canadian socialdemocracy, omitted any reference to the quebec national question.3 the communist party expelled québécois members who developed a proautonomy interpretation of the party’s formal support of quebec’s right to self-determination.4 the labour-based new democratic party, founded in 1961, has been unwilling to embrace any fundamental alteration to canada’s existing institutional structure that would reflect quebec’s national character, or even to develop a coherent approach that differed significantly from the constitutional priorities of the federal government of the day.5 soon after its founding, its quebec section voted to form a distinct parti socialiste du québec (psq). the psq advocated that quebec and canada be constitutionally recognized as “associated states.” if such an agreement proved impossible, it said, “quebec should declare its independence.”6 but the psq was upstaged on its nationalist flank by the pro-independence rassemblement pour l’indépendance nationale (rin), while the quebec trade unions were still unprepared to drop their longstanding support of the quebec liberals in favour of independent labour political action. the psq dissolved in the late 1960s. in the absence of a viable left-wing alternative sympathetic to québécois national aspirations, this consciousness was politically channeled into support for the pro-sovereignty parti québécois. founded in the late 1960s, the pq came to hegemonize the national movement as its political expression. moreover, its increasing attraction for the leaderships of quebec’s three big union centrals — which gradually shifted to seeing the pq, and not the liberals, as their preferred vehicle for political 3  regina manifesto, 1933. the manifesto was adopted by the first “national” convention of the co-operative commonwealth federation (ccf). 4  henri gagnon, n.d. 5  for a summary of ndp positions in this regard, see cooke, 2004. for a critique of the ndp’s sherbrooke declaration, its most complete and recent statement on the quebec national question, see fidler, 2011b. see also fidler, 2011d. 6  parti socialiste du québec, 1966 québec solidaire: a québécois approach to building a broad left party 150 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times influence and reform — tended to eclipse early attempts by some union militants to found independent and anticapitalist political formations. a notable effort, the front d’action politique (frap), a radical municipal party initiated in part by the montréal section of the csn, foundered in the wake of the october 1970 crisis and repression. an upsurge in mass nationalist and pro-sovereignty sentiment fueled a radicalization in the labour movement that in the early 1970s saw all three labour centrals7 issue and debate anticapitalist manifestos. but the capitalist pq was the primary political beneficiary, although a nationalist left within the party that included some prominent union officials often had a problematic relationship to the party hierarchy. the pq project was, and remains, to achieve a bourgeois-nationalist form of state sovereignty associated — the political context permitting — with canada outside quebec, or if necessary functioning as a fully independent (but thoroughly capitalist) quebec state. the pq’s popular support derived from its advocacy of sovereignty, its strong defense of the french language, culture and national identity and, initially at least, its promise of social reforms. during its first term in office, the pq enacted some important reforms, particularly in the area of french-language rights, although its legislation in this regard has been subject to constant challenges and adverse court rulings over the years. but after a total of 18 years in government (1976-1985, 1994-2003), the party no longer inspires the hopes for change that it once did. pq governments have on occasion viciously attacked unions, as in 1982 when the lévesque government legislated a 20% reduction in the salaries of government workers. the pq has consistently supported anti-worker “free trade” and investment agreements and its governments have imposed harsh austerity programs. although opinion polls have registered high and remarkably consistent support for quebec independence,8 the pq has failed to win its two sovereignty referendums. equally important, ongoing developments in bourgeois politics — such as the 1982 unilateral patriation of canada’s constitution without quebec’s consent; the 1990 defeat of the meech lake accord; or the federal parliament’s enactment of the clarity act in the wake of the narrow 1995 referendum defeat — have signalled the 7  the three centrals were the quebec federation of labour (ftq), the confederation of national trade unions (csn) and the teachers’ union, the ceq (now the centrale des syndicats du québec, or csq). 8  opinion polls indicate that even today more than 40% of québécois support independence (more than those who declare support for the pq), and a substantial majority favour greater autonomy for quebec. | 151 lack of sympathy in canada’s ruling circles not only for quebec sovereignty but for any meaningful constitutional recognition of quebec’s national identity, let alone unfettered provincial autonomy in jurisdictions essential to that identity. the new francophone bourgeoisie that has developed since the sixties, with state support (both provincial and federal), functions largely as a subset of the canadian bourgeoisie and no major component favours quebec sovereignty. today the parti québécois has less appetite for independence, although the goal of “sovereignty” is still article one in its program. doubts are growing about the party’s ability to capture enough popular support for its program to create the “winning conditions” for a successful referendum vote on sovereignty. the pq’s commitment to working within the neoliberal order, which has often brought it into sharp conflict with the unions, has fueled disenchantment with the party among the very social layers that are the driving force of the national movement. however, a credible left alternative to the parti québécois was slow to emerge within the broad québécois nationalist and left milieu. until the early 1980s, when they unceremoniously collapsed, the mao-stalinist currents that largely dominated the far left for a decade opposed quebec sovereignty, which they regarded as a purely bourgeois objective dividing the “canadian” working class. and although they opposed the pq, they also opposed proposals within the trade unions in favour of establishing an independent working-class party, advocating instead, in true sectarian fashion, the constitution of their own “proletarian party.”9 like the ccf and pro-moscow cp before them, this “far left” was ideologically defined around international events and alliances that had little or no resonance in the conditions of quebec, where the class struggle tends to unfold within a nationalist framework of opposition to linguistic and cultural oppression. there was always, of course, a smaller left that favoured independence and rejected the pq and its capitalist program. sporadic attempts were made in the 1980s to build new parties of the left, but without lasting success. the trade unions remained resistant to proposals to engage in political action independent of the pq. and during the 1980s and 1990s, the major labour centrals initiated — with political support and generous tax breaks from both levels of government — investment funds that have enmeshed the unions in the financial industry, company management structures and other strategic “partnerships” with capital. 9  for a critical analysis of this experience, see moreau, 1986. for a more extended analysis, see dubuc, 2003, especially chapters 3 and 4. québec solidaire: a québécois approach to building a broad left party 152 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times during the late 1990s, however, some cracks began to appear in the edifice of bourgeois sovereigntist hegemony in the left. feminists, the one broadly-based social movement that had largely survived the neoliberal onslaught of the 1980s — waging a successful defense of abortion rights, for example — organized a mass “march for bread and roses” that directly challenged lucien bouchard’s pq government and its “zero deficit” austerity program. they followed up with further demonstrations and, in 2000, sponsored a world march of women that mobilized tens of thousands in quebec and elsewhere. when the government rejected their modest demands for an increase in the minimum wage, women’s federation leader françoise david publicly mused on the need to create a “feminist left-wing political alternative” to the parti québécois. then, in 2001, tens of thousands mobilized at the quebec summit in opposition to the proposed free trade area of the americas. opponents of neoliberal globalization — “altermondialistes” as they are known in quebec — were soon joined by hundreds of thousands more in massive demonstrations in the lead-up to the 2003 u.s. invasion of iraq, the largest antiwar mobilization in quebec history. for the first time in decades, there was now a realistic potential for a new configuration of progressive forces. regroupment and fusion the initiative was taken — first separately, then in combination — by three far-left groups:10 the parti de la démocratie socialiste (pds) originated as the quebec section of the federal ndp. in 1995 it broke definitively from the ndp; adopted its new name; defined itself as “anti-capitalist, anti-neoliberal, feminist, internationalist and independentist”; and campaigned for a yes to sovereignty in the referendum. the pds was joined by some independent left-wing nationalists who had left the pq. members of gauche socialiste, a section of the trotskyist fourth international, were prominent in the pds leadership. the rassemblement pour une alternative politique (rap) was founded in 1998, in response to a public appeal for a “political alternative” issued in november 1997 by prominent left-wing personalities including former psq leader and union militant michel chartrand; pierre dubuc (editor of the popular independentist monthly l’aut’journal); and paul cliche, a journalist who in 1970 had led the left-wing municipal party 10  the following chronology borrows in part from dostie et al., 2006. see also lavallée, 2011, p. 202-14. | 153 frap in montréal. the rap later (in november 2000) voted to change its name to rassemblement pour l’alternative progressiste. the parti communiste du québec (pcq), the quebec section of the canadian cp, now led by individuals who had once been prominently associated with quebec’s mao-stalinist parties.11 in the 1998 general election, the rap ran seven candidates while the pds contested 97 ridings; their overall vote was small (36,000), although in jonquière the rap candidate michel chartrand took 15% of the popular vote against the pq’s premier lucien bouchard. in 2000, a joint public meeting in montréal organized by the pds, rap and pcq attracted some 650 persons to discuss “unity of the political left and progressive forces.” a liaison committee was set up by the three groups along with the bloc pot (a marijuana legalization group) and the quebec section of the green party of canada, with the objective of establishing common positions and actions. in april 2001, just days before the huge protest demonstrations at the pro-free trade québec summit of the americas, independent candidate paul cliche won 24% of the popular vote in a by-election in montréal’s mercier riding. his campaign, supported by the liaison committee, some trade unions and community organizations, indicated the positive potential of left unity. the liaison committee then became the coalition of the union des forces progressistes (ufp). in december 2001 the rap voted by a narrow majority at its congress to join the ufp.12 at a convention in june 2002 the ufp was founded as “a federated party that seeks to become a mass alternative to the parties of neoliberalism.” those attending included a large number of independent activists in addition to members of the pds, rap and pcq.13 at a subsequent policy convention in february 2003 the new party adopted a radical platform opposing free-trade agreements and calling for international solidarity (palestine, cuba, iraq), cancellation of third-world foreign debts, 11  the pcq separated from the canadian cp in 2005 when a majority of its members voted to support quebec independence. some members of the reconstituted quebec section of the canadian cp are members today of québec solidaire, but they do not constitute a recognized “collective” within qs. 12  rap founder pierre dubuc, in the minority, abandoned the project of building a political alternative to the pq. in june 2005, he joined with some trade union leaders and “left” pq members (péquistes) to found syndicalistes et progressistes pour un québec libre (spqlibre), which for a time was officially recognized as a “club” within the pq. 13  according to an internal ufp study cited by amir khadir, 56% of the members were under the age of 35 and 29% were under 29; 50% of them were first-time party members; there was a minor yet real presence of anglophone activists as well as several members of montreal’s cultural communities (amir khadir, interview by pascale dufour, march 2006), cited in dufour, 2003. québec solidaire: a québécois approach to building a broad left party 154 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times defence of the environment, extensive social and educational reforms, electoral reform, labour rights, first nations self-determination, and a constituent assembly to draft a constitution for a “progressive, republican, secular and democratic quebec.”14 the ufp adopted a pluralist structure recognizing the right of organized tendencies (“political entities”) to “promote specific orientations compatible with the platform and statutes of the ufp.” the pds was now a political entity called démocratie socialiste (later québec socialiste), although it soon dissolved as such. the rap, for its part, simply dissolved into the ufp, while the pcq became a recognized political entity within the new party. in the april 2003 general election the ufp, now registered as an official party, ran 73 candidates (26% were women) and obtained just over 40,000 votes — barely attaining the 1% of the popular vote required to qualify for partial rebate of expenses under the elections act. the highest vote was amir khadir’s 18% in mercier riding. this campaign was considered a success; some ufp candidates were endorsed by unions, and a post-election report noted that a considerable number of students had been recruited. the party now claimed a membership of some 1,800 members, almost double its membership in 2002. at a june 2003 meeting, the ufp council adopted an ambitious agenda of social movement participation, antiwar mobilizing, unification talks with the parti vert (a resuscitated green party), and fighting for an electoral regime of proportional representation to help overcome quebec’s “democratic deficit.” the members voted to investigate possible participation in municipal elections and creation of a “youth organization... both independent of and in solidarity with the ufp.” meanwhile, during the fall and winter of 2002-03, d’abord solidaires, a “non-partisan collective” of activists from the women’s and other social movements, had been formed independently of the ufp to mount a public campaign against a rise in right-wing politics that was aimed primarily against action démocratique du québec (adq), a party that split from the provincial liberals in the early 1990s on a pro-autonomy program and at one point in the months before the 2003 election was registering 40 percent support in public opinion polls on a platform centered on “family values” and “old-stock” québécois identity issues. d’abord solidaires was officially indifferent between the governing pq and the opposition liberals, not opposing a vote for either as a “lesser evil” to the adq. as it turned out, the adq polled just 18%, the pq was 14  see fidler, 2003. | 155 defeated — its vote dropped by 10 percentage points from its previous result — and the liberals led by jean charest formed the government.15 in may 2004, one of the three component collectives in d’abord solidaires, led by feminist leader françoise david and social housing activist françois saillant, founded option citoyenne (oc–citizens’ choice). it favoured political action to the left of the pq but initially rejected an invitation to join the ufp.16 david toured quebec promoting her book bien commun recherché (“seeking the common good”) and probing support for a new left party. david encountered much support for uniting the political forces to the left of the pq, and considerable openness to the idea of joining with the ufp in a new party — notwithstanding the reservations of many of her supporters, and david herself,17 about the ufp’s strong commitment to quebec independence. in december 2004 option citoyenne began negotiations with the ufp to explore the possibility of forming “a single progressive, ecologist and feminist party.” the year-long fusion process posed some major challenges to both groups. each had its distinct constituency or corporate culture. the ufp’s membership included young people from the global justice movement — internationalist and strong supporters of quebec independence, which they saw as essential to their anti-capitalist politics — along with an older layer of members, many with long experience in left and far-left politics. oc members, on the other hand, were primarily active within feminist and community organizations (60% were women) and in local grass-roots organizing around tenants’ rights, food and housing co-ops and the like, a milieu in which the politics of consensus and accommodation of conflicting views and interests are valued. oc members tended to radicalize around anti-poverty concerns, and were less likely to be concerned with quebec’s national question. but the ufp was adamant that the new party must advocate quebec independence. over a year, beginning in november 2004, option citoyenne held three “national [quebec] meetings” of its membership to develop a programmatic basis for negotiations with the ufp. draft position papers were circulated and resolutions adopted on feminism, democracy, plu15  in the 2007 election, the adq managed to displace the pq as official opposition until the following year’s election, when it was reduced to 7 seats. 16  ufp leader pierre dostie later explained that his party would have preferred that oc simply join the ufp. “but reality is very often more complex than we imagine. once we found that this political movement, given its composition and what it represented, had to comply with its own process, we sought areas of convergence and we entered into a dialogue.” à bâbord !, february-march, 2005. 17  david was once a member of en lutte, a mao-stalinist group that opposed quebec independence. québec solidaire: a québécois approach to building a broad left party 156 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times ralism and economic questions.18 a typical resolution declared that “a party of the common good, inspired by feminism” should be oriented around “values of social justice, equality, peace, solidarity, respect for the integrity of individuals and the environment, while recognizing the importance of struggles against forms of exclusion, racism, discrimination and violence, including those that continue to be exercised against women in the private and public sphere.” a resolution on economic issues, adopted unanimously, proposed that the “private-public” economic model be replaced by a “plural model” based on “the domestic economy” of family and gratuitous or volunteer services, the “social economy” of non-profit community or cooperative agencies, in addition to “private undertakings... that agree to function in accordance with collective (social, environmental, etc.) rules,” and a “public, state and parastate” sector providing equal and accessible services to the entire population. these positions differed substantially from the explicit anti-capitalism of the ufp’s program. the most contentious issue among oc members was the national question, and it was not resolved until the last oc national meeting in october 2005, when the 300 delegates voted overwhelmingly in favour of quebec sovereignty, thus fulfilling a key condition for ufp consent to a merger. the coordinating committee’s position paper justified its position largely on the basis that there was no credible or workable perspective for a renewed federalism that would allow quebec the additional powers it needed in order to resolve its social problems, but insisted that the defining characteristic of the new party should be its “social agenda” (projet social) and not its position on the national question. the delegates then voted unanimously to join with the ufp to form a new pro-sovereignty party. just three days earlier, on october 19, a right-wing manifesto had been published by former pq premier lucien bouchard, some other prominent péquistes, and equally prominent liberals. entitled pour un québec lucide (for a clear-eyed vision of quebec), it castigated “big unions” and called for lifting the freeze on university tuition fees, raising electricity rates and consumption taxes, focusing on debt reduction, opening the doors further to private sector investment in public infrastructures and ending the “unhealthy suspicion of private business that has developed in some sectors.” the important challenges facing quebecers, it proclaimed, were declining demographics and increasing global competition from asia — not sovereignty. the manifesto reflected 18  option citoyenne, 2004. | 157 a strong rightward drift of both the neoliberal pq and its federal counterpart the bloc québécois.19 thus, while the traditional pro-sovereignty parties were shifting further to the right and some prominent péquistes like bouchard were retreating from their previous commitment to a sovereigntist perspective, there was a perceptible trend developing in the opposite direction on the left, which now tended overwhelmingly to see a sovereign quebec as the framework for its social agenda. during 2005 option citoyenne and the ufp participated in some common actions and published joint briefs on sustainable development and electoral reform. and in response to the lucides’ manifesto, they initiated a counter-manifesto, pour un québec solidaire, that garnered more than 2,500 signatures.a special convention of the ufp in november 2005 voted unanimously in favour of a fusion with option citoyenne, and in february 2006 the two organizations held a joint congress to establish the new party, québec solidaire. the founding declaration of principles defined it as a party “resolutely of the left, feminist, ecologist, altermondialiste, pacifist, democratic and sovereigntist.” it was an impressive achievement — uniting leading activists in the women’s movement, some prominent trade-union militants, grassroots community organizers and long-standing leftists around a project to build a new québécois political movement based on popular and national sovereignty grounded in general principles of solidarity with the oppressed and exploited. a work in progress québec solidaire celebrated its fifth anniversary in february 2011. how has it fared? the balance sheet is uneven. during its first year, québec solidaire’s membership rose from 3,000 to just over 5,000, about 50% of them women, but since then has remained fairly stable. the party has just over 70 local associations organized on the basis of their respective electoral ridings as well as some university campus sections. about one third of these associations are considered “very active,” another one third less so, while the remainder function only minimally.20 in the last 19  at its convention in october 2005, the bloc voted to support nato membership, an eu free-trade (and investment) agreement, and the development of a quebec army and air force that would participate actively in international “peacekeeping”, as in canada’s occupation of haiti. at about the same time, pierre dubuc, the left-wing spq-libre candidate, received barely 1% support in his campaign for the pq leadership. 20  information provided at the party’s fifth convention, november 2009. québec solidaire: a québécois approach to building a broad left party 158 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times election, in 2008, the party nominated candidates in almost all of quebec’s 125 electoral counties, or ridings. québec solidaire strives for male-female parity in its structures and representation at all levels, and is headed by two “co-spokespersons”: françoise david, the party president, and amir khadir, currently its sole member of the quebec legislature, the national assembly. the party has an office with a small full-time staff, a web site and members’ intranet, and makes ample use of modern communications media such as twitter, facebook, blogs and videos. however, it has no newspaper, although this deficiency is partially compensated by various independent alternative media published by members and sympathizers of the party.21 the party lacks an internal discussion bulletin or email list, so there is little horizontal communication at the general membership level apart from organized pre-convention discussions, which are held in general assemblies in areas of greater membership density such as montréal and quebec city. a national (i.e. quebec-wide) policy commission is composed of a dozen or so theme committees, responsible for drafting papers and proposals for program development. a national women’s commission is composed of delegates from the various regions of quebec, and is charged with ensuring adherence by the party to the values of feminism. in the december 2008 general election, québec solidaire scored a major breakthrough. despite an undemocratic first-past-the-post electoral system, it managed to elect a member to the national assembly. the election of amir khadir in mercier riding brought welcome media attention to the party. his effective interventions in the national assembly have given the party considerable media exposure, and he has been able to speak out on many issues not previously associated with the left.22 however, his high media profile and popularity — opinion polls recently rated him the “most popular” mna in quebec! — have not translated into corresponding support for the party as a whole. although some recent polls have attributed 8-10% or more support to qs among the electorate, the overall score of its candidates in the two general elections since its founding (2007 and 2008) has been just under 4%. a handful of individual candidates, including david, have won electoral scores of between 10% and 30%, however; in each such case they are well-known activists in trade unions or other social movements. 21  presse-toi a gauche, http://www.pressegauche.org/ (on-line webzine), à bâbord! http:// www.ababord.org/ (bimonthly magazine), and nouveaux cahiers du socialisme, http:// www.cahiersdusocialisme.org/ (semi-annual journal, which also hosts a webzine). 22  to see khadir’s interventions in the assembly (there are hundreds of them since his election), see: http://www.assnat.qc.ca/fr/deputes/khadir-amir-25/interventions.html. | 159 although it styles itself “a party of the ballot-box and the streets” — a party of mass action as well as elections — this has not been an easy balance to establish or maintain. the political context, at least until khadir’s election, has been a difficult one in which to find opportunities to establish a visible presence in quebec’s political landscape. as in other parts of north america, quebec experienced a general downturn in extra-parliamentary mobilizations after 9-11, with the notable exception of the massive antiwar actions prior to the iraq war. added to this was the political demoralization of many militants following almost a decade of neoliberal austerity under a parti québécois government that for many discredited the very idea of quebec “sovereignty” as envisaged by the pq. the trade union movement has suffered major defeats in the face of an antilabour offensive orchestrated since 2003 by the liberal government. the student movement has been relatively quiescent since a successful mobilization against tuition fee increases in 2005. although antiwar sentiment remains high, mass actions are fewer and smaller. thus, québec solidaire has had to build itself in a period of general retreat for the very movements that generated its existence. in addition, québec solidaire has found its attention, energy and finances absorbed by election organizing, often to the detriment of extra-parliamentary mobilization. in its first three years the party faced two general elections and more than a half-dozen by-elections. besides meeting the demanding legal requirements of a registered party, it had to find and train candidates, raise funds, and hold successive delegated conventions to cobble together interim election platforms. the 2007 election platform,23 was limited to modest reforms that (as the party admitted) could be implemented within the “neoliberal and provincial framework.” it featured proposals for modest social reforms, free education, a publicly-owned pharmacare (prescription drugs insurance) agency, repeal of antilabour legislation, electoral reform through institution of proportional representation, tax reform, nationalization of wind power and expansion of public transit. however, this platform did not even reflect the minimal basis of agreement between the party’s founding components. for example, it called for a constituent assembly to determine quebec’s political and constitutional future, but did not call for sovereignty or independence. 23  http://www.quebecsolidaire.net/files/25engagementsqs.pdf. summarized in fidler, 2006. québec solidaire: a québécois approach to building a broad left party 160 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times the 2008 platform24 was much more elaborate. it called for “making quebec a country by way of popular sovereignty,” and included detailed proposals on language rights, intercultural secularism and international solidarity (for example, replacing free trade agreements with “new international treaties based on individual and collective rights, respect for the environment and a widening of democracy (such as the alba25).” but it also contained some notable omissions; for example, it opposed “canadian imperialist intervention” in the war in afghanistan but did not mention nato or canada’s other military alliances. in the 2008 election, more than half of québec solidaire’s 122 candidates were women — a first for a party in quebec and possibly in canada. the party was endorsed by the montréal council of the csn, and some candidates were endorsed by other unions. adopting a program in 2009 the party launched a lengthy process aimed at producing a formal program setting out québec solidaire’s proposals for a “democratic transformation of the whole of society over the medium and long term.” the program is distinguished from an election platform, which applies to a single government mandate, or an emergency program, a plan of action addressed to a specific context or issue.26 over a three-year period, culminating before the next quebec election, a series of delegated conventions are being held, each to debate and adopt sections of the program organized according to subject matter. the first convention, in november 2009, adopted resolutions on the national question, electoral reform, immigration policy and secularism. a second convention, held in march 2011, was addressed to the economy, the environment, and labour. other topics — health and social services, education, social and formal justice, culture, agriculture, and international solidarity and altermondialisation — will be addressed in subsequent conventions. under the complex procedure the party has chosen for conducting its program debates, initial written submissions by the members (or by “citizens’ circles” composed of both members and non-members) must 24  http://www.quebecsolidaire.net/files/qs-commitments-2008.pdf (in english). discussed in fidler, 2008. 25  alianza bolivariana para los pueblos de nuestra américa (bolivarian alliance for the peoples of our america), a progressive economic and social alliance for fair trade and mutual assistance initiated by venezuela and cuba, which now comprises eight countries of latin america and the caribbean. 26  see québec solidaire, 2009b. | 161 not exceed 800 words in length. the policy commission then compiles a “perspectives booklet” presenting concise demands based on what it considers the “principal orientations” in these submissions. these are discussed and amended or added to by qs local associations and general assemblies, following which the policy commission produces a “synthesis booklet” that arranges the revised demands by topic and, where appropriate, lists differing resolutions addressed to a particular issue as “options” (a half-dozen or so, in some cases) for debate and decision at the convention — first in topic workshops, then in plenary session, where delegates are limited to two or three minute interventions from the floor.27 at each stage the draft documents are published on the members’ intranet. (in the lead-up to the first convention, written contributions to the debate by individual members or groups of members were published on the qs web site; however, it appears this practice is no longer being implemented.) whatever the democratic merits of this procedure– and there are some, to be sure–it effectively precludes lengthier written contributions within the party structures that could outline a general strategic or programmatic framework on the given subjects and allow a broader debate among opposing approaches. as noted earlier, the party has no public or internal discussion bulletin or even an email discussion list that would allow such debates. the main topics for debate at the first program convention, in november 2009, were the national question and reform or creation of “democratic institutions.” the three hundred delegates agreed, by large majorities:28 that the quebec “nation” includes all residents of quebec, and is based not on ethnic origin but on voluntary membership in the political community, with french as the common language of public communication; this nation being composed historically by the successive integration of people originating from other communities, including the anglophone community. qs also acknowledges the sovereignty of “the ten amerindian peoples and the inuit people who also inhabit quebec territory,” and their fundamental right to national self-determination, however they choose to exercise that right. 27  in the most recent discussion, prior to the sixth convention held in march 2011, the policy commission received about 150 submissions. following publication of the perspectives booklet, members submitted about 600 amendments and new proposals or comments from about 40 local associations or committees entitled to representation at the convention. (introduction to the cahier synthèse–programme) this suggests that most of the internal preconvention discussion was on the basis of the perspectives document, with its succinct specific demands. 28  for a full report, see fidler, 2009. québec solidaire: a québécois approach to building a broad left party 162 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times that “canadian federalism is basically unreformable. it is impossible for quebec to obtain all the powers it wants and needs for the profound changes proposed by québec solidaire.” a new relationship with the rest of canada can only be negotiated once the québécois have clearly established their intent and ability to form an independent state. that independence should be achieved through a process of participatory and representative democracy, through election of a constituent assembly composed equally of women and men, with “proportional representation of tendencies and the various socio-economic milieus within quebec society.” the assembly would conduct an extensive consultation of opinion and, following its debates, its conclusions — in effect, a draft constitution — would then be put to a popular vote in a referendum. these positions mark a major advance in the party’s understanding of the national question, when compared with the minimal agreement on this question at its founding. and they clearly delimit it from the pq’s sovereignty-association and ethnic nationalism, as well as its referendum strategy which limits popular input to a vote on a question negotiated between the parties in the national assembly. the convention also addressed another of québec solidaire’s founding “values” — laïcité, or secularism — basically, separation of church and state. this is a hot-button issue in quebec, where right-wing ideologues, narrow nationalists, and some leftists and feminists have campaigned in recent years against “reasonable accommodation” of ethnic minority practices. those particularly targeted include muslim women wearing “ostentatious symbols” of their religious faith such as the hijab, or scarf, which are deemed threats to national identity or challenges to women’s rights. the qs delegates ratified the party leadership’s concept of “open” and “intercultural” secularism and opposed proposals for state-enforced dress codes that would effectively outlaw the wearing of symbols of religious belief. debate continues in the party on some related issues such as the growing demand by many nationalists and feminists that the government adopt a “charte de laïcité,” a charter to control more generally the expression of religious beliefs in the public sphere. the convention also adopted progressive proposals on measures to integrate immigrants into quebec society and on democratic reform of electoral institutions. in regard to the latter topic, qs advocates a system of proportional representation that would elect 60% of mnas as individual riding representatives, the other 40% of the seats being allocated to the various parties in proportion to their respective shares of the popular vote. | 163 the second program convention, held in march 2011, focused on environmental, economic and labour issues.29 environment. the 350 delegates voted for a major turn to “green energy,” including: a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by at least 40% by 2020 compared with 1990 levels, and by 95% by 2050. abandonment of fossil fuels by 2030. opposition to carbon taxes, carbon trading and storage schemes, biofuels, and geo-engineering. “public control” over energy firms, defined as majority participation of the state up to and including 100% nationalization as needed. prohibition of any new hydro-electric development. production of renewable energies: solar, geothermal, wind, to limit to the maximum any supplementary resort to hydro-electricity. an end to all exploration and development of fossil fuels, such as petroleum in the gulf of st. lawrence (old harry), shale gas, and lng ports. elimination of quebec’s nuclear reactor system, and an end to the exploration and development of uranium mines. development of electrified transportation to ensure the accessibility, universality “or even gratuity” of public transit. support for a new, legally binding international agreement, and participation in the world movement linking climate and social justice. it was noted that this movement is inspired by the alternative peoples’ summit on the environment held at cochabamba, bolivia in april 2010. natural resources. the convention voted by large majorities that the mining and forestry industries should be placed under “public control,” with up to 100% nationalization “as needed.” in addition: all resource industries to be subject to strict environmental regulations, and no project to be approved without meaningful public consultation in the communities concerned and a veto by local or regional authorities over development plans. mining royalties to be increased and shared equitably between the resource region and the government. in the forest industry, elimination of laws allowing clear cutting and cutting in the boreal forest north of the 49th parallel. a reduction in disparities between natural and managed forests, and a need for prior agreements with the indigenous people in all regions under aboriginal treaties or land claims. fresh water, whether surface or underground, to be considered a 29  see fidler, 2011a. québec solidaire: a québécois approach to building a broad left party 164 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times “non-commodified common good accessible to all but the property of no one,” with the state as guardian. water used by industry and businesses to be considered a “loaned” public property subject to royalties and post-treatment controls. trade union and labour rights. among the programmatic demands adopted by the convention — usually by large majorities, in some cases unanimously — are the following: constitutional protection of the right to join unions, bargain and strike, including the right to political and solidarity strikes (strikes for political objectives and in solidarity with striking workers and students). prohibition of lockouts, and strict controls on layoffs and shutdowns — including mandatory justification before a government agency, protection of company pensions, compulsory retraining and re-employment in similar jobs, etc. state assistance to employees wishing to form local worker coops when companies relocate. union rights for farmworkers and self-employed workers, and the right to multi-employer certifications. right of full employment in safe, stable, socially useful, ecologically sound work free of discrimination, with social protection in case of loss of employment, incapacity and ageing. affirmative action for women, disabled, visible minorities and indigenous. immediate reduction in the workweek to 35 hours, and “gradual” transition to 32 hours with no loss of pay, compensatory hiring and no speed-up in workload or pace. legal restrictions on the use of overtime work. an immediate increase in the minimum wage to the low-income (poverty) threshold for a person working full time, with a “gradual” increase to 50% over this threshold, indexed to the cost of living. this would mean a gradual increase from $10.66 to $15.99 per hour. expanded public employment in social services, construction, infrastructures maintenance and environmental clean-up. accessible programs for job retraining, free and funded by employers and government. virtually all of these demands have been raised by the unions and social movements; québec solidaire sees itself as their political and electoral representative. beyond capitalism? introducing the preconvention debates, the policy commission asked qs members to consider a question that goes to the very heart of | 165 the party’s conception of its overall objective: “as we work on our program, we should spell out the nature and limits of the system, and ask ourselves the following question: isn’t the capitalist system, based as it is on maximizing profit and irresponsible exploitation of nature, the main obstacle to social progress and a healthy relationship to the environment? we need a serious debate on the question so we can determine whether our social problems can be corrected by reforms that respect the logic of the system or if we need to adopt the perspective of going beyond the system.”30 this was also the question put by the québec solidaire leadership in a manifesto issued for may day 2009, entitled “to emerge from the crisis, should we go beyond capitalism?”31 the manifesto’s anticapitalist rhetoric met with a very favourable response in qs ranks.this defining issue was debated briefly during the preconvention period, although not in official party publications. some members argued that qs should remain a “rainbow coalition,” fighting “for immediate changes realizable within the framework of the present capitalist state and system.” others, however, argued for a more radical perspective: “ecosocialism,” and an explicit attention to “the class interests of the workers’ movement.”32 judging from the debates at the march convention, these questions remain open for “serious debate” in québec solidaire. in the plenary session on “general orientations,” delegates voted by a large majority for a statement declaring that “qs ultimately intends to go beyond capitalism,” and calling for a “plural economy” and “an eventual socialization of economic activities, based on a strengthened public economy (state-owned companies and nationalization of major enterprises in some strategic sectors), a greater role of the social economy (cooperatives, community-owned firms), and a controlled private sector, with much greater emphasis on promoting small and medium enterprises (smes).” no relative weight was assigned to any of these sectors. a number of delegates objected that many smes are low-wage sweatshops, the proprietors being bitter opponents of trade unions. their alternative motions were outvoted after brief debate. delegates voted as well that: nationalized enterprises are to be operated in a framework of national and democratic planning, with decentralized management including 30  québec solidaire, 2010, p.5 31  québec solidaire, 2009a. 32  for excerpts, see fidler, 2011a. québec solidaire: a québécois approach to building a broad left party 166 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times representatives of employees, the community, and first nations where applicable. forms of self-management are to be promoted in place of bureaucratic oversight. economic growth must cease to be considered an objective in itself. a qs government will take immediate legal, regulatory, fiscal or other measures to discourage over-production, over-indebtedness, and overconsumption. the emphasis on the “social economy” is not surprising, perhaps, given the traditional prominence within quebec society of farming co-operatives, the caisses populaires (originally, parish-based credit unions), and similar service-based not-for-profit organizations, with selfdefined “social missions” and relatively democratic decision-making structures.33 the attention to the “domestic economy” reflects as well the traditions and roots of many qs members in the feminist movement and its recognition that many important economic functions of society go unpaid or underpaid relative to other economic sectors. however, many of these undertakings operate in low-wage ghettos, and they often serve to legitimize the privatization of public services. and although some sectors, as in the childcare industry, have managed to unionize, some major proponents of quebec’s “social economy” are heavily implicated in collaborating with the trade union-sponsored investment funds such as the ftq’s solidarity fund or the csn’s fondaction, which have served as a major economic and ideological bulwark for the conservative union bureaucracy.34 the “social economy,” as it actually functions in quebec society, is an integral part of its capitalist economy. and some of its components, such as the massive desjardins movement, a dominant player in retail banking and insurance in the province, are major institutions of “québec inc.,” the new francophone corporate elite. a packed agenda did not allow time for debate on important resolutions on banking and the financial industry — where some draft proposals called for complete expropriation — and taxation, where pro33  in quebec as a whole, the “social economy” comprises more than 7,000 “collective enterprises (cooperatives and non-profits)” employing 125,000 workers and accounting for 8% of the province’s gdp. see: http://www.chantier.qc.ca/?module=document&uid=871. a recent study of the “social economy” in montréal alone lists close to 4,000 establishments with $2 billion in revenues and employing more than 65,000 salaried workers (women occupying about 59% of full-time and 66% of part-time jobs). they encompass a wide variety of undertakings: housing cooperatives, child-care centres, caterers, domestic care agencies, as well as some major operations in the retail, finance and insurance sectors. see université du québec à montréal, 2008. 34  see, for example, neamtam,2010. | 167 posals included, inter alia, rejection of consumption taxes and radically shifting the tax burden from individuals to corporations. these topics were left for future debate and decision. a party of the ballot boxes... and the streets? aware that “politics” is conventionally viewed as electoral and parliamentary activity, québec solidaire has established itself as an officially recognized party under quebec law. since its founding, and particularly since khadir’s election in 2008, the focus has been increasingly on a strategy of building the party through the ballot box, to the neglect of extra-parliamentary action “in the streets.” a “development plan” adopted at a national council meeting, in june 2010, summarized the objectives for the next two years as “advancing our ideas in the population, gaining a greater presence in public debates, electing more mnas and appreciably increasing our percentage of the vote in the next general elections.” a draft resolution of the qs policy commission, still to be debated and adopted in a future convention, addresses “the relations between québec solidaire, the trade-union movement and the social movements in general.” the draft text outlines a strategy by which qs, “as a party and as a government, should seek to strengthen the capacities of the social movements, encourage their unity in action and participate in them on the basis of a program of social transformation.” it proposes that qs members who belong to the various social movements be encouraged to “network” within the party — that is, coordinate their activities within the unions and other movements around a strategy of reciprocal reinforcement of the movements and the party while respecting “the organizational and political autonomy of the social movements.” this draft text addresses an important lacuna in québec solidaire’s activities. québec solidaire works alongside the unions and some social movements in a number of coalitions, such as the pro-independence conseil de la souveraineté. but its modest campaign in relation to the public-sector unions’ negotiations with the quebec government last year, labelled “courage politique,” failed to mount a clear defense of the unions’ demands and was largely confined to arguments in support of existing social programs and opposition to privatization. the party has no organized presence as such in the unions. as the policy commission puts it, the conquest of political power requires “a structured political organization whose program integrates québec solidaire: a québécois approach to building a broad left party 168 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times the demands of the social movements and an overall projet de société [program for society].” and thus it is important to think in particular about the party’s relation with “the trade-union movement, which occupies a central place within quebec’s social movements.” the undemocratic first-past-the-post system in quebec (as in every other jurisdiction in canada) poses some formidable obstacles to a new party with radical ideas facing a hostile mass media in a multiparty environment. québec solidaire promotes a detailed proposal for a system of proportional representation, but recognizes that there is no early prospect of its adoption. with this in mind, the party leadership asked delegates to the march convention to consider whether qs should seek electoral agreements with other parties under which each party would agree not to contest certain ridings in which the other stood a better chance of electing its candidate. two options were on the table: (a) a possible tactical agreement with the parti québécois and/or the verts (a small green party); or (b) a possible tactical agreement with the verts alone, a “strategic alliance” with that party being deemed conceivable if based on the global greens charter, but ruled out for “practical reasons pertaining to internal decisions of the verts in quebec.” after an intense debate, the delegates rejected any such alliances, despite appeals from both amir khadir and françoise david, among others, in support of either option. opponents noted that such alliances would blur québec solidaire’s programmatic differences from the other parties, particularly the pq, and in any case were impractical — the pq is apprehensive of the growing popularity of qs among many of its traditional supporters, and pq governments have always resisted implementing any form of proportional representation. the vote also reaffirmed the members’ determination to build québec solidaire as an independent left-wing political alternative to the parti québécois. a ‘country of projects’ the unexpected surge in support for the new democratic party in the may 2 federal election, and the sharp decline in the bloc québécois vote,35 have underscored the volatility of the quebec electorate and stimulated hopes in québec solidaire, which does not run for federal office, for major gains in the next provincial election. it has also given 35  the ndp took 43% of the popular vote in quebec, electing 59 of the province’s 75 mps. in 2008 it had polled only 12.2%, electing one mp. the bloc vote fell from close to 40% in 2008 to less than 24%, and it elected only 4 mps, although it had elected a majority of quebec’s mps since 1993. see fidler, 2011b. the bloc’s collapse has touched off a profound crisis within the parti québécois and traditional pro-sovereignty movement: see fidler, 2011e | 169 a powerful boost to the party’s campaign “for a country of projects,” launched in mid-april of 2011 pursuant to a resolution adopted at its november 2009 convention.36 the campaign web site sets out the party’s vision of sovereignty and the approach it favours for achieving it. it also outlines the party’s approach to strengthening the status of the french language, especially in montréal. as the web site explains: “some of these projects can be achieved here and now, without affecting quebec’s constitutional status. however, the people’s ambition to realize many other projects will soon be hobbled by the total or partial absence of any latitude for quebec in areas as fundamental as the environment, foreign policy, foreign trade and even language. the full mastery of our destiny is therefore indispensable for achieving all of the projects of our dreams.” associated materials (all on-line) include a historical survey that dates a québécois quest for sovereignty back to the 18th century, a critique of canadian federalism and the failure of past efforts to reform the system, and a critique of “the impasse of the pq and its referendum strategy,” to which it counterposes québec solidaire’s proposed grassroots campaign to build support for sovereignty and, eventually, the election of a democratic non-partisan constituent assembly to adopt a constitution for an independent quebec. associated articles describe parallel “inspiring experiences” in bolivia, ecuador and, most recently, in tunisia. in the fall of 2011, the campaign will feature a tour of quebec by qs president françoise david and public meetings “on themes chosen by local party associations.” this campaign has the potential to boost québec solidaire’s profile as the left wing of the independence movement, with a “project for society” and a “country of projects” that points toward an anticapitalist alternative vision that breaks sharply with the pq-bloc strategy for independence — a strategy “based on alienation from canada,” and “fuelled by resentment,” as amir khadir described it in a recent analysis of the federal election results.37 21st century socialism? the rightward evolution of the traditional sovereigntist parties, the pq and bq, has left a very broad space to their left, one that québec soli36  see fidler, 2009. the interactive campaign web site may be accessed at: quèbec solidaire 2011. 37  le devoir, may 14, 2011. translated in fidler, 2011c québec solidaire: a québécois approach to building a broad left party 170 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times daire aspires to fill. the party has managed to cast a wide net, encompassing leading activists from the women’s movement and community social action groups, veterans of previous but unsuccessful attempts to found viable parties of socialism and a marxist left, and some trade unionists. it cannot (yet) be classified as anti-capitalist, or a party of 21st century socialism as that concept has generally been conceived. but it is clearly much more than a québécois version of the federalist ndp, notwithstanding hopes expressed by qs leaders that the ndp will some day prove a valuable canadian interlocutor for quebec as it moves to independence. québec solidaire’s support of quebec independence means that its strategic framework is not limited to the existing form of the state; it opens the party’s imagination and perspectives to conceiving another, very different quebec based on the “values” or principles upheld by the party. this is not a line of march that facilitates accommodation with the canadian bourgeoisie or its quebec component. this independentism is one of québec solidaire’s strongest programmatic assets, offering it the potential to build a party that encompasses and represents the driving forces for progressive social transformation within the quebec social formation. there are other important features of the party, however, that underscore its sui generis nature in the quebec, and indeed canadian, political landscape and that offer hope for its evolution and development into a mass socialist party with deep roots among quebec working people. the party’s strong commitment to feminist principles has given it a compass in navigating through the shoals of the public debate over quebec identity and “reasonable accommodation.” despite some backsliding by the party leadership,38 qs has generally stood firm behind its support of “open secularism” in the face of harsh criticism from some on the left. the near parity of women with men in the party’s membership and structures is unique in quebec, and in canada. québec solidaire’s internationalism has been given limited expres38  qs has given critical support to the charest government’s bill 94, which would deny government-funded health care, education and child care services to all whose clothing prevents disclosure of their face, and would bar them from government and public-service employment. the bill patently targets a tiny number of muslim women who wear niqabs or burqas. and when some sikhs sought to appear before a parliamentary committee to express their opposition to bill 94, amir khadir added his vote on a pq motion, supported by the other parties, to exclude them from the national assembly because they were wearing their ceremonial dagger, the kirpan. this action is arguably inconsistent with the resolutions on laïcité adopted a year ago, mentioned in this paper. | 171 sion in its opposition to capitalist trade and investment deals, its opposition to the war in afghanistan, and in its sympathy toward progressive governments in latin america. the party has been harshly attacked in the mainstream media for its participation in the boycott, divestment and sanctions campaign against israeli apartheid, which the delegates to its november 2009 convention voted unanimously to endorse — a position that demarks québec solidaire from the ndp’s strong support of the zionist state.39 the party’s commitment to defence of the environment, if adhered to consistently, points it toward anti-capitalist solutions and the formulation of a radical ecosocialism that can link up with the worldwide movement developing in the wake of bolivia’s cochabamba conference of 2010. last but not least, the pluralism of québec solidaire, its desire to include within its ranks all those in quebec who wish to fight for another, better world, opens space for revolutionary socialists and marxists to join the party and to fight for their perspectives within the party as organized “collectives” democratically recognized by the party’s statutes although not represented as such in its leadership bodies. although they have maintained a rather low profile so far, some of these collectives could play a leading role in helping to bring theoretical understanding and clarity to the evolving debates on the party’s program and its activities. perhaps more importantly, they could help to overcome a glaring deficiency in the party: its lack of any coherent organized educational effort among its members and the larger left constituency. this paper has described in considerable detail the process of formation of québec solidaire because it has features that can serve as guides for other processes in other settings. the left groups that initiated the process recognized a shift in the objective situation — in this case the growing disillusionment with the pq, the new vibrancy of the women’s movement, and the appearance of a new altermondialiste movement mobilizing young people in opposition to capitalist oppression and injustice. they laid down a minimal set of principles for regroupment and consolidation: a strategic framework of striving for the independence of quebec; feminism, both programmatically and organizationally (as in male-female parity in party structures); pluralism, inclusion of all who agreed to support and work to implement the party’s “values” and general orientations, and respect for minority opinions including the right 39  québec solidaire was a strong supporter of the recent “boat to gaza” solidarity project, delegating a qs leader, manon massé, to participate personally on the party’s behalf in the international attempt to breach the israeli blockade of the palestinian statelet. québec solidaire: a québécois approach to building a broad left party 172 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times of members with particular perspectives to organize within the party in support of their views; internationalism — placing anti-imperialism, solidarity and global justice at the core of the new party’s politics. and throughout, they were willing to let the process follow its own rhythm. as pierre dostie said, in describing the ufp’s approach to fusion with option citoyenne, the latter “had to comply with its own process, [so] we sought areas of convergence and we entered into a dialogue.” (note 15, supra) the goal is to build a party that encompasses and represents the leading militants in all those movements that are, in various ways, engaged in struggles against capital. the future of québec solidaire is closely linked to its ability to become more integrated in quebec’s broad labour-radical subculture, and to develop the “reciprocal relationship” with the trade union and popular movements that is outlined in the policy commission proposal. to the degree that it does this, the social and ethnic composition of the party will change. qs is still a “white” party, for example. neither its membership nor its leading bodies reflect the diverse ethnic and immigrant composition of quebec. it is no accident that its major achievements so far, the election of amir khadir, an iranian-quebecois with deep roots in the independence movement, was scored in one of montréal’s most ethnically diverse constituencies. québec solidaire cannot yet be characterized as an anticapitalist party. but it is fair to say that it is much more than a québécois version of, say, the federal ndp. some important features of the party underscore its sui generis nature and offer hope for its evolution and development into a mass socialist party with deep roots among quebec working people. references à bâbord ! (february-march 2005). négociations ufp-option citoyenne: go! go! gauche!. chantier de l’économie sociale (march 28, 2011). définition. retrieved from http://www.chantier.qc.ca/?module=document&uid=871. cooke, m. (2004). constitutional confusion on the left: the ndp’s position in canada’s constitutional debates. retrieved from http://www.cpsa acsp.ca/papers-2004/cooke.pdf dostie, p. et al . (2006) .quelques repères dans l’histoire de la gauche politique québécoise. (website of the union des forces progressistes, no longer available). dubuc, p. (2003). l’autre histoire de l’indépendance (éditions trois-pistoles, | 173 éditions du renouveau québécois). dufour, p. (2009). from protest to partisan politics: when and how collective actors cross the line. sociological perspectives on québec solidaire, canadian journal of sociology/cahiers canadiens de sociologie 34(1), page range. fidler, r. (december 10, 2003). quebec’s new united left party. retrieved from http://www.greenleft.org.au/node/28531 –-. (december 10, 2006). québec solidaire adopts a program for government. retrieved from http://www.socialistvoice.ca/?p=142 –-. (december 15, 2008). québec solidaire scores major breakthrough in quebec election. retrieved from http://lifeonleft.blogspot.com/2008/12/qubecsolidairescores-major.html –-. (december 4, 2009). quebec left debates strategy for independence. retrieved from http://lifeonleft.blogspot.com/2009/12/quebec-left-debatesstrategy-for.html –. (2011a). beyond capitalism? québec solidaire launches debate on its program for social transformation. retrieved from http://www .socialistproject .ca/ bullet/491 .php –-. (2011b). the federal ndp’s electoral breakthrough in quebec: a challenge to progressives in canada. retrieved from http://lifeonleft.blogspot. com/2011/05/federal-ndps-electoral-breakthrough-in.html –-. (2011c).more on that election. retrieved from http://lifeonleft.blogspot. com/2011/05/more-on-that-election.html –. (2011d). layton chooses supreme court, clarity act over ndp’s sherbrooke declaration. retrieved from http://lifeonleft.blogspot.com/2011/05/layton chooses-supreme-court-clarity.html –-. (2011e). behind those resignations from the parti québécois. retrieved from http://lifeonleft.blogspot.com/2011/06/behind-those-resignations-fromparti.html gagnon, h. (n.d.). les militants socialistes du québec. retrieved from http:// www.pcq.qc.ca/dossiers/pcq/histoire/lesmilitantssocialistes.pdf lavallée, j, (2011). du parti de la démocratie socialiste à québec solidaire,” in la gauche au québec depuis 1945, (bulletin d’histoire politique, 19, 2, winter 2011), p. 202-14. moreau, f . (1986) . balance sheet of the quebec far left. retrieved from http://socialisthistory.ca/docs/history/bilan-moreau-english.htm neamtam, n.. (2010). interview: integration with trade unions is key to the success of social/solidarity economy initiatives. retrieved from http:// www.chantier.qc.ca/?module=document&action=get&uid=1059 option citoyenne. (2004). document préparatoire à la rencontre nationale. retrieved from http://www.lagauche.com/lagauche/spip.php?article1078 parti socialiste du québec. (1966). programme 66. longueil: les presses québec solidaire: a québécois approach to building a broad left party 174 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times sociales. québec solidaire (2009b). définition du programme politique. retrieved from http://programme.quebecsolidaire.net/definition –-. (2009a). pour sortir de la crise: dépasser le capitalisme? manifeste de québec solidaire . retrieved from http://www.quebecsolidaire.net/ files/2009-05manifeste-crise.pdf –-. (2011). pour un pays de projets. retrieved from www.paysdeprojets.org –-. (2010). pour une société solidaire et écologique....cahier de participation au programme, enjeu 2.retrieved from http://programme. quebecsolidaire.net/documents/cahier_de_participation corrige.pdf#page=5 regina manifesto. (1933). title (italics) retrieved from http://www. saskndp.ca/assets/file/history/manifest.pdf université du québec à montréal. (2008). chaire de recherche en économie sociale . portrait statistique de l’économie sociale de la région administrative de montréal. retrieved from http://www.credemontreal.qc.ca/ publications/developpement%20economique/p ortrait%20 statistique%20economie%20sociale.pdf alternate routes a critical review editorial board : marybelle myers, erika van meurs distribution and promotion : brian mckee alternate routes is a multi-disciplinary journal published annually by graduate students in the department of sociology and anthropology at carleton university in ottawa. it is not, however , restricted to work from students at carleton. we are interested in receiving papers written by graduate students (or co-authored with faculty) in any university . editorial emphasis is on provocative analysis of contemporary issues and we particularly welcome papers dealing with debates within canadian society. the theme of volume 7, to be published in 1984 is class and ethnicity . ve also welcome critical responses to articles published and we occasionally publish review articles of important works. two copies of your typewritten manuscript should be sent to: alternate routes, department of sociology and anthropology , carleton university , ottawa, ontario, kls sb6 the editors gratefully acknowledge the financial assistance of the carleton university community : the department of sociology and anthropology and its chairperson, gordon irving; the dean of social sciences , dennis forcese; the graduate students ' association and the sociology and anthropology graduate students ' caucus. we also wish to thank eva hegmann, jennifer davidson and kim mitchell for their assistance . subscriptions : individuals and institutions : $4.50. make cheques payable to a iternate routes . copyright 1983 alternate routes printed in canada editorial statement the papers in this special issue reflect both the versity of perspectives which have been applied to eminist issues and the wide range of substantive problems eing addressed. armstrong and armstrong examine quantitative data ollection by statistics canada. they argue that the onceptualizations and operationalizations employed reflect male bias. the authors suggest changes to remedy this ias, and in addition to this, emphasize the need for a reater use of qualitative techniques . in a second paper, written from a psychoanalytic erspective , hamilton contributes to the ongoing feminist ebate on the oppression of women by capitalism and atriarchy . saunders focuses on the roles of women during '.iffevent stages of post revolutionary china. she argues hat since revolution is an engineered process , the status f women is to some extent, determined by those who have the ower to direct this process . morris examines the history , structure and operation f the national action committee on the status of women (nac) lather than simply endorsing the popular view that the organization is elitist and ineffective , the author stresses he structural constraints which prevent it from realising it< pal cf representing azz women. in the last contribution , bourgeault deals v'.z'-. the ~ub$ugation of native (indian and half-breed) women in lorthern and western canada since the development of the k-r trade. be emphasizes that an analysis of the rac' . , colonial and class divisions which came into being is crucial por our understanding of the process of oppression cf native oomen . biographical sketches hugh armstrong obtained his b.a. (political science and history) and his m.a. (sociology ) from carleton university . his ph.d. thesis was recently 'deposited' at the universite de montreal . he now teaches sociology and humanities at vanier college , montreal. most of his research is conducted with pat armstrong on women and work. their book, a working majority : what women 'lust do for pay , was published earlier this year and they are at present revising the double ghetto canadian women and their segregated work , first published in 1978. he is a manuscript editor for studies in political economy . pat armstrong obtained her b.a. (sociology) from the university of toronto and her m.a. (canadian studies) from carleton university . her m.a. thesis formed the basis of the double ghetto . she now teaches sociology and women's studies at vanier college, montreal and is a ph.d. candidate in sociology at carleton university . her thesis is on women and the economic crisis. she has been on the executive of the canadian sociology and anthropology association and is now on the editorial boards of perception and of australia/ canada studies . ron bourgeault currently works for the association of metis and nor:status indians of saskatchewan (amnsis) and the gabriel dumont institute of native studies and applied research, regina, saskatchewan. his current research deals with the modern history of the indian and metis of western and northern canada. roberta hamilton received her b.a. (sociology ) from carleton university in 1963 and her m.a. from concordia university in 1975. she is now completing a doctoral thesis in humanities at concordia university and has just been appointed assistant professor in the faculty of arts and sciences at queen's university . she is the author of the liberation of women: a study in patriarchy and capitalism . cerise morris worked for several years as an activist in the women's movement in montreal , co-ordinating a women's centre and focussing on women ' s issues in social work practice . her graduate work was done at mcgill university where she obtained a msw in 1971 and a ph.d. (sociology ) in 1982. her research interest is in how the demands and issues of feminism get translated into policy. eileen saunders is presently employed as an assistant professor in the school of journalism, at carleton university , she obtained her m.a. at queen's and recently completed her ph.d. (in sociology) at carleton university. her doctoral dissertation was entitled feminist theory and socialist revolution. carleton university ottawa, ontario offers programs of study leading to the master's degree in • anthropology • geography • international affairs • public administration • social work • soviet and east european studies • canadian studies • management studies and to the master's and ph.d. degrees in • economics • political science • psychology • sociology generous support is available to qualified candidates. further information may be obtained from the graduate studies and research office, 15th floor, arts tower, carleton university, ottawa, ontario k1s 5b6. a critical review vol. 6, 1983 contents pat and hugh armstrong 1 beyond numbers: problems with quantitative data roberta hamilton 41 the collusion with patriarchy: a psychoanalytic account eileen saunders 61 socialist feminist theory: the issue of revolution cerise morris 87 pressuring the canadian state for women's rights: the role of the national action committee on the status of women ron bourgeault 109 the development of capitalism and the subjugation of native women in northern canada graduate studies in sociology and anthropology carleton university the department of sociology and anthropology offers the following programs of advanced study and research: m.a. and ph.d. degrees in sociology, with specialization in comparative social organization social demography ecology theory methodology m.a. degree in anthropology, with specialization in north american studies theory methodology information regarding admission requirements and financial support may be obtained from: coordinator of graduate studies department of sociology and anthropology carleton university ottawa, canada k1s 5b6 beyond numbers: problems with quantitative data pat and hugh armstrong using statistics canada as an example , the authors argue that statistical data collection must be sex-conscious where it is now sex-blind. it must take the different work, location , bodies and experiences of women and men into account . the theoretical assumptions behind the numbers must be examined from the perspective of women; the claim to truth and the monopoly of fact challenged. supported by examples from interviews conducted by them for other research , the authors go on to argue that qualitative techniques can expose the holes in, as well as complement and check, the data collected by more quantitative means. introduction as c. wright mills pointed out many years ago, "social research of any kind is advanced by ideas; it is only disciplined by fact" (1959:71). ideas, particularly the systematic organization of ideas into theory, are, however, too often forgotten in social research. facts are frequently identified with numbers and numbers with neutrality or, even, truth. this is especially the case when the numbers are collected by a state agency such as statistics canada. in this paper, we argue that numbers, and the methodology used to gather them, cannot and should not, be separated from their social context, nor from the ideas that direct their selection, toreover, numbers cannot be viewed as the sole, nor even necessarily the most accurate and relevant kind of fact. the inadequacy of numbers for a full understanding of the position of women is camouflaged by reference to "scientific" methodology, by the adoption of non-sexist language, by the use of similar questions for both sexes and by the tabulation, according to sex, of most data. but for the most part, women and men do different work, in different places, for different pay. given this segregation, as well as the different reproductive capacities of the sexes, many questions are women's questions, many answers are women's answers, many categories are women's categories, many omissions primarily affect women. from this perspective, we begin with a critical examination of statistics canada, the chief source of the numbers so often taken as the facts. explicit and, more often, implicit assumptions are built into the collection and tabulation of these data, assumptions which may serve to conceal or to distort important aspects of 2 women's work. moreover, some information which is crucial for understanding the nature and conditions of women's work is inaccessible to, or lost from, quantitative measures, however carefully structured the questions and explicit the ideas. building on this critique of statistics canada in particular and quantitative approaches in general, we go on to suggest how qualitative techniques can expand and correct our view of women's work, complementing and acting as a check upon information gathered by quantitative means. in conclusion, we recommend, first, that more funds be allocated to theory development, that is, to the ideas which advance social science research. secondly, we recommend that a thorough examination of the assumptions, methodology and presentation of data by statistics canada be initiated from the perspective of women, with a recognition of the sex-segregated nature of women's work. finally, financial support should be directed towards research which goes beyond surveys and the limited data available from statistics canada to connect these with the qualitative aspects of women's work, to the nature and conditions of their jobs in and out of the labour force. in what follows, examples from statistics canada are used only to illustrate the argument. a comprehensive and systematic examination of this important agency's approach still needs to be done. assumptions and concepts according to mills (1959:67), all empirical research involves "a choice as to what is most real." but the basis of these choices, the theoretical assumptions inherent in the collection and tabulation of data, are often obscure, sometimes even to the 3 statisticians themselves. as john irvine, ian miles and jeff evans (1979:5) explain in their introduction to demystifying social statistics : it is not enough, however, merely to make the case that statistical data cannot be interpreted without reference to their underlying theoretical assumptions. all data, whether produced in the course of academic research or by state bureaucracies, are structured by the conceptual framework that is applied as well as by the technical instruments used in their production. it is the precise nature of these practical and theoretical commitments that needs investigating for each set of data. while the technical instruments are usually clearly described in statistics canada material, the theoretical commitments are seldom discussed. few publications explore the assumptions behind the research or the specific selection of questions, responses and techniques of analysis. [1] this alone suggests a perspective which considers its theoretical approaches unimportant or absent, its methods scientific, and its numbers objective reflections of reality. as a result, it is not always a simple task to determine what is being measured and why, let alone what is being ignored and for what reasons. explicit statements outlining theoretical approaches are rare but an examination of concepts and how they are operational ised does reveal some of the assumptions behind the data. for women, probably the most obvious example is the definition of work: it includes working for wages, salary, tips or commission, working in their own business, farm or professional practice, or working without pay in a family business or farm owned or operated by a relative in the same household. "work" excludes housework or other work around the house, and volunteer work (statistics canada, 1982a :17). what statistics canada is interested in counting is not all the ways people spend their days or their energy, not how they survive on a daily basis, not how food gets to their tables, nor even how they improve 4 their standard of living. ch the other hand, interest is not limited to paid employment, to work that brings individuals money income. rather, the focus of concern is work which results directly in profit and exchange. as the guide to labour force survey data explains: the concepts of employment and unemployment are derived from the concept of the supply of labour as a factor of production measured over a short interval of time. the production referred to is in turn defined as those goods and services included in the national accounts (statistics canada, 1979:15). the interests served are not those of women, since the work most women do at home for their families, as well as the important volunteer work they do in hospitals, schools, playgrounds and a wide variety of other institutions disappears. this is not to suggest that counting housework or volunteer work would change the nature of that work. that they are not considered reflects the perspective of statistics canada. the omission indicates that there are assumptions behind the data, assumptions which produce a picture that excludes much of the work most women do and dramatically underestimates the labour involved in daily survival. less obvious than the assumptions about the kind of work that counts are the assumptions related to the structure of families. mien collecting data on households, statistics canada seems to assume that each household has one person primarily responsible for financial support, that this person is normally male if there is a man in the house and that women by themselves have the babies. here too, the concern seems to be with the connection of the household to the economy outside the home rather than with what happens within this domain. largely in response to feminist protests, statistics canada has dropped the term "head of the household" and replaced it with "person 1". for the 1981 census, respondents were instructed to: 5 choose one of the following as person 1: either tre husband or wife in any married couple living here either pertner in a common-law relationship the parent, where one parent only lives with his or her never-ferried son(s) or daughter(s) of any age if none of the above applies, choose any adult member of this household. but in spite of the introduction of non-sexist terminology, little change in the data was anticipated. indeed, alterations in other sections of the census helped ensure that this would be the case. according to the 1981 census dictionary : in 1981, the criterion for determining family type was changed. a new question was added to the census questionnaire to determine a person responsible for paying the rent, or mortgage, or taxes, or electricity, and is used to identify primary and secondary families. in previous censuses, the primary family was defined as the family of the head of the household. while we anticipate that in the majority of cases the person responsible for household payments will also be considered as the household reference person (person 1) , this will not always be the case (statistics canada, 1982a:63). research in the united states (vickery, 1979) and in canada (armstrong and armstrong, 1983) suggests that the income of employed women who live with men pays for food, clothing and services rather than shelter and energy. thus, the criteria selected to determine the family maintainer favour men, even though the actual amount allocated for mortgages, taxes and electricity may be lower than that spent on food (canada department of finance, 1981:13). the primary family, then, becomes another way of getting men beck as the head of the household. men's headship is further reinforced by the decision to record only one family maintainer. if respondents write in that these expenses are jointly paid, one will be selected by the statistician. maintenance, the census assumes, cannot be shared. according to a statistics canada spokesperson, it is not possible to obtain the financial contributions and expenditures of each member of the household 6 because "household income is not important data." not important for whom? once again, it is women's contribution which is the most likely to disappear. one aspect of the household, however, does seem to be recorded for women alone. census question number 37 asks: for women [emphasis in the original] who are married or have ever been married: how many children were ever born to you? furthermore, according to the 1981 census dictionary , "childless families refers to those families where the wife has reported that no children were ever born to her" (statistics canada, 1982a:62). biological reproduction does require male participation, ferriage is not required for conception. yet the census records the fertility of ever-married women only. wnile women always know how many babies they produce and while some men may be in doubt, the lack of male precision hardly seems large enough to warrant their exclusion from these parenting records. in the absence of a clear justification for this approach, it is tempting to assume that women's childrearing responsibilities — the social extension of biological reality — are the focus of concern. however, given that some men retain alone the responsibility for their children and given that some never-married women also keep their children, the data obscure actual child care arrangements. the same is true of the practice of counting only never-married children living at home.f2] divorced and separated offscrinq may, however, be returning to their parents' homes, seeking financial and emotional support as well as babysitting and other family care services. failing to record these dependencies, like the omission of data on the financial and work contributions of each member, hides the actual 7 economic relationship within the family. it also conceals the additional work such dependencies may mean for women. moreover, given the growing unemployment and inflated housing costs facing young people, it seems plausible that more and more young marrieds will be looking to their parents for financial support and for accommodation. statistics canada seems ready to provide little assistance in monitoring these growing dependencies. the conceptualisation and operational isation of work, maintainer, and fertility illustrate the importance of assumptions to findings, of choices to the selection of facts. the development of the problem, of the hypothesis, takes place at least as much before the information is collected as after statistics canada publishes its numbers. however, in the absence of explicit theoretical justification for these choices, it is possible only to speculate about the theoretical framework guiding the data collection. consequently, debate has focused on the techniques, which are explicit, rather than on the hypotheses, which are obscure. but, as e. p. thompson (1978:231) said of historical research, scientific investigation "consists in a dialogue between concept and evidence." wien one half of the dialogue is missing, it is difficult to evaluate the results. in canada, theoretical work has been divorced from, and has taken second place to, empirical research. both suffer in isolation. the theoretical assumptions behind the data should be brought to light for examination and the development of theory should be strongly supported as legitimate social science work. collection of data the methods used to gather data both reflect the assumptions behind the research and affect the information collected. techniques cannot be fully evaluated nor understood outside the social and economic structure or their particular historical period. who is interviewed , how they are interviewed, the information sought, the alternative responses offered and the consequences of the answers are all significant factors in the production of statistics. here, too, choices are necessary and the choices have important consequences for our view of women's work as is shown below. the point, of course, is not to argue that everything is relative; it is not to deny the existence of the 'real' world in some phenomenological sense. rather, it is to advocate theoretically-informed and sceptical caution in the use of data as we, quite reasonably, seek more reliable knowledge about the world. 1. deskilling harry braverman (1974) , in his perceptive analysis of work in the twentieth century, describes how the pursuit of profit has encouraged the separation of manual and mental labour as well as the progressive deskilling of both white collar and blue collar jobs. in these times of government restraint, a similar process seems to be taking place in the collection of statistics. many of the tasks are simplified to allow their completion by untrained persons. while the labour force survey continues to employ trained enumerators, the census now depends heavily upon self-enumeration. however, as statistics canada (1980a:14) points out in the social concepts directory , "the questions are usually phrased to be suitable for self-enumeration for a reasonably well-educated respondent." the assumption of "reasonably well-educated" respondents can be made neither about the population covered by the census nor about those included in the more comprehensive questions of the 1/5 sample. not only does this procedure encourage the simplification, and perhaps 9 even the omission of important questions, it also means that errors in the interpretation and responses to questions are much more likely. those many women who have not had the opportunity to learn to read and write one of our major languages cannot be sure that they are counted in (and many of those viio have, in previous censuses, earned money administering the questionnaire are counted out of those paid jobs) . 2. restraining legislation even if the respondents clearly comprehend the questions, they may be unwilling to expose their position to government scrutiny, in spite of assurances about confidentiality. according to the women we interviewed, a range of government programmes and regulations discourage them from reporting their employment and earnings (armstrong and armstrong, 1983). for example, veterans' allowances, disability pensions and welfare payments set a low maximum on family income. reporting employment and pay often means, then, a reduction in much needed benefits. low maximum earnings set for day care subsidies have a similar effect. for those relatively low-income families, the effective tax rate on paid employment may well be 100 per cent. and the income tax regulation wiich sets a low maximum on the amount a spouse may earn and still be claimed as a deduction also frightens some away from declaring their employment to any government representative conducting a survey. employers may discourage their employees from reporting income, wishing to evade regulations and contributions to government programmes. rules related to contributory plans such as unemployment insurance and canada/quebec ftension also encourage women to hide their employment, sacrificing their future and current protection in order to take home a little more money at the end of the week. many of these people are 10 unwilling to take the chance on promises of secrecy. that such factors can have a significant effect on data collection has not been entirely ignored by statistics canada. the 1981 census dictionary (statistics canada, 1982a :13) notes that tax changes allowing for the deduction of spouse's wages as expenses "may have changed the status of some self-employed persons from 'without paid help' to 'with paid help' if they decided to pay wages to their spouses." few of those disappearing from and appearing in the unpaid spouse category are male. that this hidden economy, this invisible workforce, is composed primarily of women is, of course, difficult to prove. our research suggests, however, that many of them are women who do hairdressing or typing at home, look after children in their ovn or other people's houses, scrub floors and do errands for pay, sew baby clothes and stick labels on bottles, or sell their sexual services on the street. it seems likely, then, that labour force data fail to capture many of the women vino work for pay, especially those who are employed in the lowest paid and least protected work. employers as well as individuals may be influenced in their responses by government regulations. for example, the statistics canada monthly publication employment , earnings and hours which provides the current information in this area, is based on employers' answers to survey questions. but laws related to minimum wages and equal pay, to hours and overtime, to piece rates and benefits may discourage some employers from accurately filling in the blanks. it should also be noted that the survey includes only those establishments with twenty or more employees. since many women are employed in smaller workplaces, this information may not only count some women inaccurately but also exclude entirely many of those in the lowest paid jobs. ii 3. sampling financial and geographical considerations frequently make sampling techniques necessary. however, important data can be lost through the choice of sample over comprehensive methods, or through the choice of a small sample size. when many people are in a category, they are accurately picked up by sampling techniques but the method is much less precise when few people fit into the group. with women highly concentrated in some occupations and industries and virtually absent from others, the use of samples in collecting labour force data in both the monthly surveys and the 1981 census means that some women will not show up in non-traditional occupations and industries, because the estimates are unreliable. trie female electricians in prince edward island, for example, are extremely unlikely to become visible, although the female professors in ontario have a better chance. 4. machine processing when large numbers of responses must be processed quickly, the tendency is to rely on those questions and responses which can be read by machine and easily categorised into neat tables. as c. wright mills (1959:57) pointed out, "the kinds of problems that will be taken up and the way in which they are formulated are quite severely limited by the scientific method. methodology, in short, seems to determine the problems." it is difficult, of course, to tell what is left out as a result of being difficult to measure numerically, or to determine the extent to which questions are structured by methodological as against theoretical considerations. but the two kinds of consideration are clearly linked, and the consequence is that we miss out on some important issues. for example, the absence of questions on the labour 12 process is perhaps a result of both theoretical and technical considerations. the absence of statistics on the nature and conditions of work influences our understanding of the employment situation of women since it is on the shop floor, and in the bank, the restaurant, the hospital and the grocery store that sex segregation and inequality become reality. 5. the wbrding of questions statistics canada argues in its social concepts directory , that "the key consideration to be borne foremost in mind, when constructing questions, is the viewpoint of the respondent with the needs of the survey sponsor in the background" (1980a:15). while the viewpoint of the respondent is certainly important, sponsor needs are seldom explicitly revealed to those using the data. moreover, it is not simply the viewpoint of the respondent which should be thought about but also the structural constraints influencing the answers. in developing the wording of questions, more than their clarity, brevity and simplicity should be considered; sex segregation of work should also be taken into account . the census asked, for example: "last week, how many hours did you work (not including housework or other work around the house)?" cxir research suggests that such questions are answered in a variety of ways, depending upon the nature and conditions of the work. women who work part-time frequently have short daily hours of steady work, with few if any paid breaks. the hours they report working are fully spent at the desk, behind the counter or on the line. with few, if any, paid holidays, the days per week they report may also not be comparable to those with full-time jobs. moreover, those who work in non-unionised 13 establishments often work without breaks, have short lunch periods and stay late to finish up. yet they calculate their hours from when they are required to be at work until the formal quitting time. not only are they not paid overtime, but they do not view these extra minutes as time on the job. finally, those who work in homes as domestics, babysitters, cleaners and piece workers normally have very long, but inaccurately recorded, hours. the point, of course, is that these part-time, non-unionised and/or home workers are disproportionately women. the recorded sex differences in hours worked are only in part the result of actual differences. they also reflect the way in which the question is asked and answered. to ignore the sex segregation of the labour force is to produce faulty data on issues such as hours worked. 6. excluded questions it is not only the questions that are asked but the ones that are not asked which should be considered in light of women's structural segregation in and out of the market. for instance, the monthly survey of employment, earnings and hours requests information on the total number of female employees as well as the proportion that are wage and salary earners. employers are not questioned, however, on how much they pay these female wage and salary workers. nor are they asked about turnover rates, about which people leave which jobs after what period of time for what reasons. once again, it is women who are most concerned about revealing wage differentials. it is women who are accused (in the absence of evidence) of having high turnover rates resulting from their low level of commitment to their paid jobs. fofriile people are asked about their formal education, they are not 14 asked about their skills. in assuming competence can be measured by formal certification, statistics canada fails to measure the actual skills people employ in their jobs. women's skills, in particular, disappear because as one woman explained to us about the requirements of her job, "it's what every woman knows how to do." furthermore, the absence of such a question means that there is no real assessment of the resources available for coping with the new micro-electronic technology. because these skills are new and constantly changing, many are learned on the job and cannot, therefore, be measured by questions on formal education. and many more women are learning how to use this equipment on the job than are acquiring these skills in credit courses. although fringe benefits are an increasingly important part of workers' incomes, the sex differences in this field are virtually ignored by statistics canada. various factors — such as the ineligibility of some part-time, salaried and young workers, not to mention the wage and salary basis of most benefits — may mean that female employees receive fewer rewards in this area as well. yet the monthly survey reported in employment , earnings and hours does not cover fringe benefits. and between 1967 and 1975 several surveys of labour costs in various industries were conducted and then jointly published by statistics canada and the department of labour, but with no data on the benefits by sex. finally, only in saskatchewan are workers' compensation records published by sex of claimants, and these figures indicate significantly lower claims for women (statistics canada, 1980b:27). in part because statistics canada produces so little information on occupational health and safety, it is difficult to learn just why this is the case. the failure to ask a question about relatives requiring special is care has a similar effect. information is collected on the number and ages of children but not on aging grandparents or disabled younger people who make up part of the "personal or family responsibi] ities" fulfilled by women as part of the invisible work that reduces their labour force participation. in general, by not asking these questions, and by not collecting information by sex, significant aspects of women's, and men's, work are hidden from view. 7. selecting alternative responses the data are not only conditioned by the questions asked, or not asked, but also by the choices of response that are offered. in the census question on major source of income, for instance, one choice was "working for wages, salaries, tips or commissions." that statistics canada asks employers answering their monthly survey to distinguish between wage and salary earners clearly indicates that these differences are seen to be significant, yet they disappear from the census, from what is supposed to be the more complete source of information. workers may well be concentrated by sex into each of these categories, but this is impossible to tell, given the choices offered. perhaps the problem is more obvious in another possible response to this question. the "other income from government sources" choice includes, "alimony, child support, periodic support from persons not in the household, net income from roomers and boarders, noninvestment income such as retirement income from abroad, scholarships, etc." (statistics canada, 1982a:24). by lumping together these diverse sources, statistics canada does not facilitate the analysis of income sources by sex and occupation. in not offering technological change as a reason for leaving last 16 job, the labour force survey is missing the opportunity to monitor the effect of micro-technology on employment. since the research to date (eg. menzies, 1981) suggests that women will be hit first and most, omitting this alternative conceals important factors influencing female labour force work. 8. denying history if the purpose is to understand what is happening to women today and what will happen to them in the future, it is necessary to examine the changes that have been taking place, to take an historical perspective that exposes the factors influencing these changes. but statistics canada makes such analysis difficult by failing to ask historical questions and by changing questions or categories. few historical questions can be found in the census. in the questionnaire distributed to the 1/5 sample, those designated "person 1" are asked how long they have lived in their current dwelling. everyone is asked where they lived five years ago. ever-married women are asked how many children were ever born to them. labour force information is collected only for the last year or at most for the last year and a half, and job search for the last four weeks. for personal history, then, the only information available from the census is ever-married women's life-long fertility, most people's residence change from five years ago, and some people's recent labour force experience. nor does the monthly labour force survey collect much historical data, although some occasional publications do look at labour force activity over time. for example, in 1976 statistics canada published earnings and work histories of the 1972 canadian labour force . based on the 1973 survey of consumer finances, the study reported data on male 17 and female earnings differentials and work history between 1967 and 1972. respondents to the sample were asked what their main activity was while not working for periods of one year or more, with "kept house, raised children" as one possible answer. they were not asked why they left their last job. the analysis of the data suggests that the higher turnover and lower wages reported for women were related to their decision to stay home with the house and children, to their choice of dropping out of the labour force to do their unpaid women's work. yet, since most women continue to do the housework and child care work whether or not they have paid employment, it seems unlikely that many women without a paid job would not be mainly keeping house and raising children. with the rare historical investigations based on such questions and alternative responses, it is difficult to find out what is happening to women over time and what factors influence these patterns. little, if any, information is available on the historical impact of new technologies, particularly of the micro-electronic technology now so important to women's work. nor is it possible, from statistics canada data, to examine the effect over time of different kinds of work on the health of men and women. it is also extremely difficult to relate alterations in the resources and structure of families to labour force changes. if the data followed some families, recording the hours, duration, type and wages of work for both spouses and for children, as well as their health situation, their skills and their reasons for entering or leaving specific jobs, it might be possible to understand the factors structuring people of different ages and sexes into and out of labour force jobs. without such information, any explanation is necessarily partial and superficial, focused on individuals outside their historical, familial and even much of their economic context. 18 changes in the collection and categorization of data also make historical investigation difficult. of course, the alterations may reflect primarily changes that are taking place in the labour force. this was the case, for example, in the separation of file clerks and receptionists from the secretarial category and in the new definition of part-time work (a reduction in weekly hours from less than 35 to less than 30). in other cases, the changes may result in part from new government policies and programmes. for farm workers, (statistics canada, 1982a: 12) : the data between 1971 and 1981 may not be strictly comparable because of small changes in definitions. females who were unpaid family workers, worked as farm labourers and did less than 20 hours of unpaid work a week were excluded from the labour force according to the 1971 definitions. these persons are now included in the employed labour force. cue to changes in the tax laws and census procedures, some persons formerly identified as unpaid family workers may now be classified as paid workers. the tax changes permitted for the first time, in the 1980 tax year, the deduction of a spouse's wages as expenses. this may have resulted in some changes in the status from unpaid family workers to paid workers. as well, census editing of this category was more stringent in 1981. some alterations, such as the switch from "head of household" to "person 1," may be related to pressure from feminist groups. but some changes seem unrelated to any of these concerns. for example, the census dictionary reports that: in all the 1981 tables on "occupation based on the 1980 classification", the 1971 "not stated" category will no longer appear. this category has been redistributed by imputation into new "imputed groups" within each minor group (statistics canada, 1982a: 37). since clerical employees, part-time workers, unpaid employed spouses, workers with unstated occupations and people not heading households are usually women, these new definitions and categories primarily affect the analysis of women's work. whatever the reasons for the changes, the need for historically comparable data should be a central concern. in 19 explaining the objectives of the labour force survey revision project, statistics canada (1977:19) indicated an awareness of the problem, noting a ...demand for new information on the dynamic aspects of the labour force to supplement the monthly "snapshots" the new survey provides, much more information is required on the gross movements between various labour force categories each month, along with somewhat longer term longitudinal data covering the six month period over which the respondents are surveyed. the problem is, however, far from solved. 9. comparing data sources the problem of comparable data is not confined to history. many government agencies and departments collect statistics but the definitions, categories, responses, techniques, time periods and tabulations are often different, making comparisons difficult. even within statistics canada, these differences sometimes exist. miile statistics canada is working to eliminate these discrepancies, some do remain, obscuring the actual situation of women at work. for example: for the unemployed and the not in the labour force groups, data from the labour force survey refer to the last job held by persons who have worked in the last five years. since no question is asked on the most important activities or duties in the job held, as in the census, the labour force survey may classify more persons to the "managerial" group on the basis of job titles than would be the case with the census (statistics canada, 1982a: 37) . itfiile the numbers are probably not large, the discrepancy makes comparison difficult. and once again, it is most likely women who are the extra persons classified by the labour force survey into the managerial group, since they are the ones most likely to have jobs that are labelled managerial but whose actual tasks would place them lower on the hierarchy of census occupational categories. 20 tabulation of data not only the collection but also the tabulation of data can influence the view of women at work. as statistics canada points out in its guide to labour force survey data (1979:13) "virtually any combination of questionnaire values can be cross-tabulated on request, subject to a 'reliability' criterion which is related strictly to the sampling variability and size of the estimate." however, such extra tabulations often cost money, limiting their access to those with research funds. and of course, the information available for tabulation is restricted by the problems with data collection cited above. furthermore, the tabulations that are published, since they are the most accessible, are the most widely used, especially by the media. thus, although most information is now collected by sex and could be tabulated for men and women, the published compilations form the basis for most of the public commentary on women as well as much of the research. these tabulations therefore deserve particular attention for the view of women they present. tabulations may both reflect and confirm assumptions about women. the proposed tables on census families to be drawn from the 1981 census are a case in point. according to statistics canada's products and services of the 1981 census of canada (1982b:32-36) , tables will be published on husband-wife families in private households by the wife's age and highest level of schooling. these are the only listed tables on husband-wife families in private households which use the wife's characteristics as the basis for compilation. data will be tabulated for these households by both the husband's and wife's highest level of schooling, labour force activity and age. the rest of the tables for these households will be compiled primarily on the basis of the husband/pa rent's characteristics. in particular, this is the case for 21 the income data which will be tabulated by husband/parent's age, highest level of schooling, work activity and period of immigration. that income tables are not based on the wife's characteristics indicates a particular view of women's place as well as reinforcing the perspective which sees the economic contribution of wives as secondary. perhaps their childbearing and childrearing responsibilities account for the concern about their age and schooling. the categories used in tables also influence the perception of women's work. the labour force survey's "managerial, professional, etc." category, for example, lumps together laboratory technicians and neurosurgeons, library technicians and full professors, managers of small shops and senior executives from general fotors.r3] trie wide differences in power and pay, as well as the sex segregation, disappear. indeed, the growth in the proportion of women in this category has helped to create the false impression that there has been a significant improvement in the position of women. in publishing tables by occupation and industry separately, the labour force survey data also creates the impression that women have been moving into prestigious management jobs and into traditional male fields such as construction work. cross-tabulations of industry and occupation data indicate, however, that, in 1980, three-quarters (74.8%) of female managers worked in the service industries while less than half (42.8%) of the male managers were employed there. in the construction industry, less than ten per cent (9.3%) of the women actually did construction work; over seventy per cent of the women employed in that industry held clerical jobs (armstrong and armstrong, 1983: tables 3 and 10). wien such cross-tabulations are unpublished, segregation is camouflaged. furthermore, change may be suggested where little has, in 22 fact, taken place. theory and methodology in quantitative research counting women in means much more than including a question on sex and tabulating the results separately for women and men. it requires not only an awareness that people come in two sexes but, also, a recognition that the experiences of women and men are segregated in many ways, that policies, programmes, concepts and questions have a differential impact on women and men, that some questions are women's questions while others ignore or denigrate their contribution. the intention here is not to attack statistics canada. indeed, it should be noted that statistics canada has been willing to alter some concepts to bring them more in line with the actual contributions of women and men. note, for example, its abandonment of the census policy permitting respondent's paternal ancestry only to be recorded. nor is the intention to draw up a shopping list of changes required in established techniques. the examples provided here are designed merely to illustrate problems with its methodology and thus to indicate that official data collection and the funding of research need to be re-examined if women's work is to be counted in. but to begin such a re-examination, it is necessary to start with theory, with the systematic organization of ideas, both because theory is the major way of advancing our understanding and because methodology is inseparable from the perspective which guides the choice of what is real. the assumptions behind the data should be drawn out for critical appraisal. however concretely the questions surrounding the collection and tabulation of statistical information are posed, the methodological answers must be theoretically informed if they are to be useful. in 23 order for statistical information to be improved, theoretical work, as well as theoretically informed methodological work, must be undertaken. this in turn entails that theoretical work be financially supported. in particular, problems of deskilling, restraining legislation, sampling, machine readability, the wording and avoidance of specific questions, the selection of possible response choices, the denial of history, the comparability of data sources, and the choices about what to tabulate and what tabulations to publish need to be examined from a theoretical perspective which takes the sexual division of labour into account. and that theoretical perspective itself needs to be refined. no matter how finely tuned and sex conscious the theory and techniques are, however, some information will continue to evade quantitative approaches, whether based on sample or universal surveys. some of the information collected through such methods, no matter how carefully the questionnaires are structured and the data collected and tabulated, may create an inaccurate view of women's work. at best, such techniques can produce only a partial picture of the daily working lives of canadian women. quantitative data miss, and may misrepresent, many aspects of women's experiences in and out of the labour force. in the final section of this paper, we draw on material and lessons learned from lengthy interviews conducted with women in working class jobs to argue that qualitative data are at least as important as quantitative data in developing an accurate view of women's work. qualitative research from horace miner's 1939 study of a french canadian parish to v>eg luxtor ' s 1980 examination of women's work in the home, qualitative research has provided valuable insights into women's daily experiences. 24 such studies are rare, however, in part because they are expensive and time-consuming, but mainly because they are considered somehow less legitimate than statistical analysis. as a recent letter to the public from the 1981 census manager makes clear, statistics canada views itself as producing "facts," profiles which are "useful, convenient, complete." and many social scientists would agree that these facts, these numbers, are more reliable and accurate than data collected from lengthy hours spent and conversations with women in flin flon. but the bias in favour of 'hard' data is seldom based on a rigorous comparison of the findings of quantitative methods with those of qualitative research, or of their value in explaining or predicting women's actions. nor is the bias often based on respondents' assessnent of the accuracy of the facts, on the ability of these facts, in lillian rubin's (1976:13) phrase, "to generate an 'aha' experience." nor is the bias gender-neutral , as pauline bart has so eloquently pointed out: we speak of hard data as being better than soft data, hard science better than soft science, hard money better than soft money. in the fifties, one was criticised for being "soft on communism." this is of course a male sexual metaphor, so since discovering this, i have substituted a metaphor based on female sexual experience and refer to wet and dry data (quoted in roberts, 1981:22) . the bias is not, however, simply a matter of metaphor. it reflects the priority given to the collection of some kinds of data, those which are easily counted, frequently repeated and amenable to statistical analysis. but, as feminists have long made clear, the personal is political. daily work and family relationships have a profound impact on work activity; physical and social conditions influence ideas and actions, lb leave them out — and many are difficult or impossible to include in sample survey and statistical analysis — is to create not only huge gaps in the data but, often, inaccurate information as well. 25 our experience in interviewing women about the nature and conditions of their work suggests that gualitative research provides a necessary complement to quantitative analysis because it can test the reliability of quantitative data, can collect information not accessible to survey techniques and can indicate areas that should be included in quantitative analysis. t4] 1. checking the facts keeping questions clear, simple and direct does not necessarily guarantee the accuracy of responses. because the approaches used in gathering qualitative information take many aspects of the individual's life and relationships into account, and because the less rigid and more informal style of data collection often encourages a more open exchange, these qualitative "facts" can frequently be used to test the results of quantitative research. interview procedures which are flexible, unstructured or partially structured, and wide ranging, permitting people to offer their own responses and views, frequently draw out quite different information than that collected through highly structured , official sounding questionnaires which allow only machine-readable choices. in our experience, direct questions may elicit responses which are often contradicted by information gathered through more probing and indirect techniques. for example, when we asked women if they knew of any health dangers in their jobs, some simply said no. yet, when describing in detail an average day on the job, various work related problems emerged. a clerical worker who uses visual display terminals (vdt's) in a trust company responded negatively to the health question but earlier had told us that during the day, "sometimes i'll go dovn to 26 the lounge and fall asleep, my eyes are so sore." a factory worker who offered a similar response also told us that, with her right foot operating the sewing machine, her right hand adding cloth, and her left hand guiding the material as quickly as possible all day to ensure a survival wage from her piece work job, her arms, feet and legs hurt: "sometimes when i come home, i can't make more job in my house." various explanations were offered for this discrepancy. they expect work to hurt, so sore arms, legs, heads and hands may not be defined as health hazards but simply as part of the job. many of the dangers women face are invisible and have a slow, cumulative effect. thus, they are less likely to be associated with the job than are the broken toes or burnt hands that men more often suffer. and a few do not want to think about the dangers, because they have to go back there to work tomorrow. wiatever the reasons for these seemingly contradictory responses, they indicate that simple, direct questions will not always reveal the simple truth. like the questions on health and safety, those on sexual harassment also suggest that direct questions provide only limited, or inaccurate, pictures of the situation. v^en we asked women if they had ever been sexually harassed, some had difficulty answering the question — even when examples were given — often, because they had come to accept this behaviour as part of the job. some defined such treatment as a problem only if they could not resist. one woman offered a very definite no to the question . when reminded, however, that she had said, in describing her work history, "that was something else — if you could keep out of the boss's hands," she explained that she had made it clear to "knock it off." therefore, she felt "you don't have to write a book about it." some said it was unlikely, given they worked with women only or had a lone male boss. what this evidence suggests is that, if a question on sexual harassment were asked of all employed women, there would probably be an overwhelmingly negative response because of the way women perceive and respond to advances and because many women are segregated into jobs where there are few men to do the harassing. i^oreover, if the only answers recorded were those given for this question — as is the case with most machine-readable questionnaires — then much of the counter-evidence would disappear. there are also often quite valid reasons for women to hide information from official government statisticians or from written questionnaires they fill out for the government . when we asked one woman for her age, she requested that the tape recorder be turned off so she could tell us her real age. her boss, she explained, thought her below retirement age. she could not live without her employment income and thus she could not risk exposure. this woman not only had our assurances that we would not link her age to her name, job or employer, she also lived in a large metropolitan area where any identification was extremely unlikely (as was the possibility that her employer would read a book on work by a couple of sociologists writing for the canadian advisory council on the status of women) . however, she was not alone. barely making ends meet, one woman collects a small unemployment insurance cheque, takes in foster children, babysits on weekends and does odd clerical jobs while the children are in school. although willing to exchange this information over coffee in the kitchen, she made it very clear that, since her survival was at stake, there was no way she would write that information down on a questionnaire. thus, even on such seemingly straightforward questions as age and employment, 28 the facts may not be accurate. the qualitative date can help us become more accurate and become more sceptical about the supposedly hard data. in other cases, the answers given may be literally correct but hide a significantly different reality. one waitress, for instance, is paid the required minimum wage, but her employer then forces her to sign the cheque back to him. the taxes are paid, the law is obeyed to the letter; however, her real income is low and irregular. a similar problem is evident in data on segregation and wage differentials. as one clerical worker explained, the difference in wages can be justified on the basis of different job categories but conceals both segregation and unequal pay: ("there used to be] rnale accounting clerks. they promoted all those male accounting clerks to management and left the women in accounting, and they hired nothing but women in accounting since. so they're hiring women to work for lower jobs than the men and the excuse is that [the men] have a family. women don't have families? plus, when there were men in accounting they always got paid higher than the women and the excuse they use is because they're men. women don't live any more cheaply than men... it was a pretty sick excuse but to fight it wasn't worth it. ..the manager was called in and twe] bluntly asked , "why are the men getting paid more than us?" we're not saying we're doing any more work but we are equal in work, we should be equal in pay. we know as much, maybe even sometimes more. he said, "if the men are married and if they're not, men always get paid higher." i couldn't believe it! at least find a decent excuse. don't use that one on me. whatever the excuse, such inequality is unlikely to appear in the survey data. rather, evidence for equality and for conformity to the law is more likely to show up. these examples are designed to illustrate how qualitative data can be used to check quantitative data. but this methodology can do more than suggest where the figures do not measure what they are supposed to measure. this approach can also indicate where there are holes in the data, where information could be, but is not, collected in 29 quantitative research. 2. exposing the holes whole areas of women's lives remain virtually untouched by government and other quantitative research and it would be impossible to do an inventory here. in the course of our interviews, however, many conditions were exposed which could be measured by existing quantitative techniques, and thus serve to illustrate the oft-complementary nature of these approaches. for example, some women indicated that they could not join the company pension plan until they had been with the organization for a specified period of time or until they had reached a certain age. general questions on persons covered by pensions overlook policies like these which have the effect (and perhaps the purpose) of preventing women from adequately protecting themselves in their old age. the wcmen we interviewed also drew attention to sick pay policies. simple to measure but seldom enquired about, sick leave is not covered by most labour codes. for many women, "if you sick, you sick." no work means no pay. given their meagre earnings, most simply cannot miss work if they are ill. "clerks cough in your face because they can't afford to be sick. i know i do." the significance of workers' health to the transmission of disease was recognized many years ago when special labels were attached to homework goods to warn potential customers that they might spread contagious diseases from workers' homes (johnson and johnson, 1982:47). but today, women who are not well may process food, sew clothes, care for other people's children, and serve meals in restaurants because they cannot miss a day's wages. gnce again, the interview response indicated an important issue easily measured by quantitative methods but all too often ignored. 30 another example of the contribution qualitative research can make to the collection of quantitative data comes from the investigation of procedures for promotion. niany of the women we interviewed told us, "i don't think there's such a thing there as promotion," suggesting that enquiries into women's upward mobility should begin by examining whether or not such movement is possible. although many people have pointed out that women are often locked into dead end jobs, few have exposed another difficulty mentioned by these women. some refused promotions because a move to a higher position meant little, if any, increase in power or pay and because it would eliminate the only satisfying aspect of their work — companionship with other women. oie woman turned down a promotion because it meant working at night, with more responsibility and virtually no increase in pay. here too, questions on what rewards are offered by promotion, if promotion is possible, are not difficult to get at through survey techniques but the researcher must first be aware of such possibilities. in quantitative research, the problems revealed are likely to be technical. in qualitative research, the difficulties exposed are more frequently substantive, suggesting new areas for investigation, ones which are often amenable to quantitative techniques. the examples of pensions, sick pay and promotions serve to indicate some ways qualitative data can improve the collection of facts in quantitative research, and can aid in the selection of what is real. 3. collecting efeta inaccessible to quantitative techniques qualitative research can do more than merely indicate ways to improve quantitative techniques. it can provide complementary (or contradictory) information that brings life to the statistics, fills in 31 the numbers and explores relationships, moreover, such methods can look at the meanings of experiences in a way that cannot be measured by multiple-choice questionnaires that generate machinereadable answers. they can permit the investigation process to be an exchange which allows those being studied to participate actively in the description and definition of their lives. how could a survey of worker skills take into account the kind of conscientious performance revealed in a fish packer's description of her work? for my job, i don't think it requires too much skill. it takes energy. it takes common sense to try to keep doing your work properly so it doesn't slow down production. if you have no interest and no common sense... you know that the bosses are going to stop you and the machine is not going to take it and there you're going to stop production. there are some girls that just don't care. i'm not saying i'm perfect 'cause i'm not and i do lots of blunders myself but i do respect my job. after all, it can do something to your job if you're not going to pack good fish that the public will want to buy, and if the people are not going to buy from the plant that's going to be bad for your job. or the pride of a home worker who is paid by the number of skirts she sews? my sister-in-law says, "i don't know how you work so fast," but i have to do fast. everything i have to do fast. on thursday i have 74 skirts. my husband said, "you don't finish this week." i said, "sure".. . .and i finish on friday night. or the sound of an office? the noise level is unreal because we have— 11 phones in a small area. they ring constantly. all of the typewriters going... 10 typewriters and usually 4 or 5 more for the casuals. ..by 3 o'clock, i can't stand it and my nerves are really bad. or the reality of working on a line? basically, i stand there all day and slash the necks of the chickens. you make one slash up on the skin of the neck and then you cut around the base of the neck so the next person beside you can crop it... the chickens go in front of you on the line and you do every other chicken or whatever. and you stand there for 8 hours on one spot and do it. on a regular day tfive people] can do maybe about 30,000 fryers. 32 or the dangers that many women face? one day the propane dryer caught on fire. they never evacuated the plant. they just tried to put the fire out. i think when a propane dryer that size catches on fire, it's a big fire. the plant should have been evacuated. that's my opinion now. and there are people working right by that dryer. if you die, you die. if you don't, you get the work done. such things cannot be easily measured, tabulated and fed into a computer for the analysis of statistical relationships. it is not only descriptions that emerge from qualitative analysis. often, some of the most important processes at work, some of the most potent forces, are missed in quantitative data collection. for example, the implied threat of firing and the awareness of a huge reserve of women desperately searching for work have a powerful influence on women's performance on the job. according to one clerk: to get fired from office staff, all you gotta do is look sideways. it's got to the point where everybody knows that you've got to do your work to keep your job. there's always another person ready to take your job. close supervision also has an impact that is difficult to measure. a supervisor of proof-readers ... ...used to time us with his stopwatch behind your back... you can imagine what it was like. i came home on friday night and my husband, he had to give me two good slaps in the face because i was knocking my head on the wall. i wanted to kill the foreman. the structure of work, too, strongly influences performance, as a chicken slasher explained: basically, the reason that you don't make too many mistakes is because one job relies so much on the other. if you don't slash it and if they can't crop it, then it can't be drawn. so you can't miss a chicken because then further down the line they bring it back or they holler, "hey, what are you doing?" so this pretty well means you stay awake. these relations with other workers both ensure that the pace is maintained and help women get through the day — that is, if they are permitted to talk: 33 if you were standing there all day and you wouldn't talk, well you go right bananas— a. friend by me, she always says, "for goodness sakes...say something, say something," 'cause it breaks up the time if you have a little conversation. you're not allowed to stand and talk but. ..you can talk as much as you like as long as your hands go. such research can also show that women are not merely passive but actively participate in shaping their working conditions. from the women who adjust the thermostat when the boss is not looking, to the women who develop elaborate strategies to vary their tasks and eliminate boredom, there are many examples of women individually resisting the structure of their work. women also get together to slowdown the line when it is going too fast, or to force changes in their work environment, as was the case in one plant: when i'm working, it is hot. ..we don't have ventilation enough. where i'm working, there are three big fryers and the fat is hot and when that fish strikes the fat, it gives smoke. and there's times when you go in there, you can just about see through the place. now, we're inhaling this all day. now, we don't have no ventilation. there's no windows. when you're in there you don't know if it's raining, snowing, hurricane or whatever outside. when you go in, you're there; when you come out, then you see what kind of day it is. they have fans and half the time they are not working for the simple reason that it's the fat that clogs them. we have walked out already and i was the head one on our line too. i told my supervisor, "there's no way i can stand it in there. i'm choking and i cannot stand it. i'm going out 'till it's cleared up." and the girls followed us... they got it fixed the next day. although justified by the conditions, this woman was frightened: "t*y heart pounded like you'd never believe. i hate doing anything like that 'cause i'm scared of getting fired." it was not her sex but her lack of job security that had discouraged this kind of resistance in the past. qualitative research can also capture, in a way that is impossible in quantitative investigations, what it is like to be an employed woman. for example, the women we interviewed reported that they were frequently asked to do extra tasks that were unrelated to 34 their job description but fell into that all too broad category "women's work." as a woman hired to fill mail orders explained, "i hate dusting and cleaning. i don't go to work to do these things. i can do them at home. ..yeah, i do it." most women go home to yet more of these same kinds of tasks: all i have to say is that a working mother, when she has to work and leave her kids at home, it's pretty hard whether she's married or single. a mother that works and raises a family has to be pretty strong, very strong. i really feel sorry for the mother with the little kids — have to bundle them up in the morning and take them to the day care center and pick them up again at night. i wouldn't go through that again that way. it's too hard. in our research, we were unable to explore the relationship between home and work in any detail, but the recent case study of an east coast fishing village (cbnnelly and maceonald, 1983) clearly illustrates the importance of relating domestic and wage labour to each other and to the wider economic structure. such relationships and such an integrated approach are missing from quantitative data which usually measure individual activity, for short periods of time, in a restricted context. and quantitative research misses what technological change means to the workers: "before, everyone was a typesetter. now everyone works on a typesetting machine." "i went through tests two years ago and they found out that my hearing is poorer in one ear than the other. mien i started there they told me that my hearing was very good." perhaps even more elusive are the silent, psychological firings that never appear in the statistics. che long-time secretary described how she was refused training on the new electronic equipment, how her job slowly disappeared, how she spent hours at her desk with nothing to do, how she had to stay at her desk in order to get paid and how staying there meant it was difficult to look for alternative work. finally she quit and was therefore not defined as a victim of the new technology. 35 qualitative data are often dismissed as anecdotal, as unscientific, as unrepresentative because they do not include a statistically selected sample of the target population. researchers often respond to this criticism by resorting to statistical analysis alone or by transforming their information into numbers. komarovsky (1962:204), for instance, takes a group of fifty-eight marriages and tells us that "among the older couples. . .only three per cent of the less-educated husbands" complained that "we have nothing interesting to talk about." yet, the way our examples resonate in the lives of women suggests that they tap many shared experiences. they may provide not only a fuller, more humane, picture of women's daily lives, but a more accurate one as well. conclusion theory, statistics and qualitative data are all necessary for rigorous research. theory guides the selection of the real, the techniques employed to expose it, and the explanations used to understand it. statistics can help to establish the broad outline of the picture, a picture that can only be fully developed with the aid of qualitative data. we have argued that, like all methodologies, those of statistics canada reflect a perspective, one that better serves the interests of men and the economy than those of women and the home. available data do not permit a thorough examination of the sex-segregated labour force; they offer little assistance in examining the labour process, health and safety, hiring, promotion, wages and benefits, job security — to mention only a few issues — as they affect women. the priorities of the agency thus allow only a partial, and sometimes distorted, view of 36 women's work. we have also argued that statistics are not all they have been cracked up to be. the way data are collected and tabulated, the way questions are asked and not asked, the way government programmes and policies are structured and the way in which history is considered, all influence the data and in the process often leave out and sometimes misrepresent the position of women. qualitative data, while not free of faults, can provide an effective complement to quantitative techniques, checking the results, suggesting alternative areas and methods for research and filling in the numbers with the actual experiences of women. what is required is, first, a more thorough evaluation of statistics canada from a perspective which acknowledges that, given the sexual division of labour, most structures, processes and programmes have a particular impact on women. second, more theoretical work should be done to aid this critical evaluation and to promote the development of other ideas. third, more funding for qualitative research is necessary if we are to understand, and change, what it is like to be a woman in canada today. notes * this is a slightly revised version of a paper appearing in mary kinnear and greg mason (eds.) , women and work: proceedings of a conference on data requirements to support research into women and the canadian economy (winnipeg: university of manitoba institute for social and economic research for the social sciences and humanities research council of canada, 1983). our thanks to pat grainger, bob stirling and maryanne webber for comments on the original version. [1] statistics canada does explain its methodology but the justification 37 for particular kinds of techniques rests on the assumption that these are primarily scientific and practical rather than theoretical issues. the tools are not related consistently to the theoretical framework. for example, statistics canada's methodology of the canadian labour force survey (1977:23) offers the following justification for the use of a stratified sample: though the main advantage of stratified sampling is the possible increase in efficiency per unit cost in estimating the population characteristics, stratification also introduces considerable flexibility in the sense that, depending upon the information available, sampling and estimation procedures may differ from stratlm to stratum. further, in a continuous survey like the lfs, stratification provides an added flexibility of updating or redesigning the sample of a specified stratum or groups of strata, without affecting the design in the remaining strata. see also the tool-kit orientation of statistics canada's (1980a) social concepts directory . for a contrary example, however, see kim farrell7^ (1975) article on the impact of keynesian and post-keynesian developments in economic theory on labour force survey measures. [2] the census does publish data on additional persons in the household (see, for example, statistics canada, 1982c:table 6) but the nature of this relationship and, particularly, the consequences for the household economy and domestic labour are difficult to determine from such figures. the assumption seems to be that only never-married children are dependent. [3] some lfs occupational data are now available at the minor group (three-digit) level of detail, at which the broad "managerial, professional, etc." category is broken down into 26 distinct occupations. shortcomings remain, however. this information can be obtained in unpublished form only, and, because of the 'reliability' criterion, as part of only a few, general cross-tabulations. [4] the 65 interviews included in our study (armstrong and armstrong, 1983) were conducted by 7 researchers selected for their expertise in interviewing techniques, knowledge of feminist issues and familiarity with a particular area of canada. the interview schedule was designed as an outline of areas to be covered rather than as specific questions to be asked. interviewers were instructed to gather as much information as possible on each area, to record conversations on tape and to view the work site. we wish to acknowledge the assistance of sonja greckol , sharon kirsh, judy mosoff , shirley pettifer and martha tracey in the interview stage of the project. 38 references armstrong, pat and hugh armstrong 1983 a working majority . ottawa: supply and services canada. canada department of finance 1981 economic review . ottawa: supply and services canada. connelly, m. patricia and martha maceonald 1983 "women's work: domestic and wage labour in a nova scotia community", studies in political economy 10. farrall, kim 1975 "theories, concepts and the art of measurement: economic theories' relationship to the labour force survey concepts," notes on labour statistics 1973 (statistics canada cat. no 72-207) 20-28. ottawa: information canada. irvine, john, ian miles and jeff evans (eds.) 1979 demystifying social statistics . london: pluto press. johnson, laura c. and robert e. johnson 1982 the seam allowance: industrial home sewing in canada . tbronto: the women's press. komarovsky, mirra 1962 blue-collar marriage . new york: random house. luxton, meg 1980 more than a labour of love. three generations of women's work in the home . tbronto: the women's press. menzies, heather 1981 women and the chip: case studies of the effects of informatics on employment in canada . montreal: the institute for research on public policy. mills, c. wright 1959 the sociological imagination . new york: grove. miner, horace 1939 st. denis: a french-canadian parish . chicago: university of chicago press. roberts, helen (ed.) 1981 doing feminist research . london: routledge and kegan paul. rubin, lillian breslau 1976 worlds of pain . new york: basic books. statistics canada employment, earnings and hours , monthly (cat. no. 72-002). ottawa: supply and services canada. the labour force , monthly (cat. no. 71-001). ottawa: supply and services canada. 3.9 1976 earnings and work histories of the 1972 canadian labour force . (cat. no. 15-55"). ottawa: industry, trade and commerce. 1977 methodology of the canadian labour force survey 1976 (cat. no. 71-526). ottawa: industry, trade and commerce. 1979 guide to labour force survey data (cat. no. 71-528). ottawa: supply and services canada. 1980a social concepts directory (cat. no. 12-560). ottawa: supply and services canada. 1980b workmen's/workers' compensation: social security, provincial programs (cat, no. 86-501). ottawa : supply and services canada. 1982a 1981 census dictionary (cat. no. 99-901). ottawa: supply and services canada. 1982b products and services of the 1981 census of canada . ottawa: supply supply and services canada. 1982c 1981 census, volume 1. census families in private households . (cat. no. 92-955) . ottawa: supply and services canada. thompson, e.p. 1978 the poverty of theory . london: merlin press. vickery, clair 1979 "women's economic contribution to the family," in ralph e. smith (ed.) the subtle revolution: women at work . washington: the urban institute. 40 socialist feminist theory: the issue of revolution eileen saunders this paper explains the reproduction of sexual inequality in socialist systems with the argument that an emancipated role for women is strategic during the phase of revolutionary mobilisation but, given the productive priorities of the new state, equality will be downplayed during the period of consolidation. the case of china is used to illustrate the tension between female productive and reproductive roles and to support the argument -hat, since revolution is an engineered process, female status is partially determined by the priorities of the engineer . introduction socialist feminists are beginning to arrive at some common understanding of the role of women under capitalism, at least at a general level of analysis. we agree that we must focus on the interconnections between patriarchal relations and the historicallysituated interests of capitalism, supporting our arguments with research detailing the relationship between the exigencies of evolving capitalism and the socio-political position of women. the position, however, on the relationship of women to socialism is less clear. while juliet mitchell was calling for the "articulation" of our relationship to socialism over a decade ago, our response has been uneven, at times contradictory, and, above all, limited at the theoretical level. as with the proverbial donkey, we dangle the carrot of socialist revolution in front of our collective noses, with the implicit knowledge that its consumption may alleviate the hunger without eliminating it. we know that which we negate, but are not as sure of that which we affirm. but, that said, we still fall back on a precarious "after-the-revolut ion-trust" fweinbaum, 1978:8) . accordingly, confronted by feminists who point to existing sexual inequalities in various contemporary socialist states, the response, though varied, contains one unifying theme, the attempt to 'explain avey' the inequalities. this occurs in several ways: ch the one hand, there are those who would deny that inequality persists in socialism, citing bourgeois propaganda, liberal distortions, and north american ethnocentric standards as the sources of such conclusions. essentially, they argue that female emancipation can be demonstrated through a comparison of pre-social ist and socialist female status. oi the other hand, there are those who would argue that 62 persisting inequality is a consequence of cultural lag, the remnants of a feudal tradition which will eventually disappear. finally, a similar strand focuses on technological underdevelopment, arguing that full emancipation must await sufficient development in the forces of production. wiile obviously different in terms of their focus of analysis, each category of response assumes a processual transition from the pre-revolutionary period through to the post-revolutionary period. in other words, there is an implicit acceptance of the linear rationality of socialist revolution; namely, that ideology of women's role developed during the concrete revolutionary process is a pre-figurative version of the post-revolutionary regime's policy toward the role of women in the 'new' society. underlying this assumption is an expectation of gradual elevation in female socio-political status as the socialist regime extends its control over the entire society. if the expectation remains unrealized, we are locked into either examining the prefigurative version (i.e. where did engels go wrong?) or arguing that the transitional process has not fully evolved (i.e. give us another ten years to get the 'kinks' worked out) . essentially, the motivation for this paper lies in a dissatisfaction with the socialist feminist response to the feminist dismissal of socialism. what appears to have happened is that socialist feminists have felt we must either deny the 'accusations' or argue for patience in the face of impending cultural/economic development for the 'accused' regime. wiat i would argue is that neither approach sheds light on the role of women within a socialist revolution, lb deny the reality of the phenomenon is as meaningless as to apologize for history by promising a better future. 63 the real theoretical problems are to account for the context of the participation of women relative to men, and to articulate the mechanisms of change . female emancipation under socialism is not an all-or-nothing phenomenon; it is a process which has taken on different dimensions in different historical periods. it is precisely this fluctuating nature of progress and retrenchment in women's issues under socialist revolution which must be explained, lb accomplish this, one must look at the historical process involved in the development of socialist revolution. in other words, we must use history to determine the mechanisms of change, not merely to "compare the present to the past and see progress" (sidel, 1974:123). a starting point in this task is to treat as problematic the assumption of a processual transition from prerevolutionary ideology to post-revolutionary praxis. in other words, i will begin by treating as analytically separate the period of revolutionary insurgency and the period of post-revolutionary consolidation of power. the problem is to examine the interaction of the revolutionary party/state exigencies in each period and policies concerning the productive and reproductive roles that women play in each period, d] hopefully this approach will avoid the error of treating ideology as determining praxis, by arguing that historical material realities necessitate a praxis which may have little to do with the ideology of liberation. in the following, i will attempt to suggest how one can proceed to investigate the interaction of socialist revolutionary requisites and policies regarding women, and how one can use the 'model' to make sense of certain developments in the chinese revolution. 64 revolution: the process and the product as suggested in the introduction, the analysis of socialist revolutions must take account of two distinct phases: the process of attempting seizure of the incumbent state apparatus; and the process of consolidation of the new state apparatus (in marx's terms, the insertion of a 'dictatorship of the proletariat') . [2] the problem is that there is a void within marxism in terms of a political theory which addresses either process in any detail (see miliband, 1977 and boggs, 1977) . although there is a general framework with which to approach the issue of socialist revolution and transition (i.e. the notion of a proletariat achieving self-anancipation with the aid of an organizing party) , the problem of how, and the problem of transition to a new stage was never fully worked out by marx. the emphasis on the historical inevitability of the transition has subordinated the question of how a revolutionary movement actually brings about the process. this problem becomes even more acute when an industrial proletariat is either weak or non-existent, and when capitalism is at an early stage of development (and often inserted from outside) . the general framework, as mapped by marx and engels and modified by lenin, seems even more remote in these cases, cases which become important vshen one looks at the growth of socialist movements in the third wbrld. the fundamental question becomes: how does a revolutionary socialist movement build socialism under those conditions? in other words, what is required of the organizing revolutionary party? and , how can those requisites affect policy toward women? i turn first to the process of seizure of power. 65 a. phase of insurgency lb begin, one can isolate two clear tasks of a revolutionary party at this stage. first, the movement, through the direction of the party, must seize effective control of the state apparatus from the incumbent elite. thus, through force , the movement can remove a regime from power. this is essentially a military question concerning the strategic mobilization and deployment of armed forces. i am not concerned with the relation of this task to the role of women, other than to point out the necessity of replacing labour power displaced by military mobilization. second, the movement, through the direction of the party, must destroy loyalties to the old regime. this task is essentially a question of dealing with the impact of traditionalism, an obstacle which cannot be dealt with by force alone. as mliband (1977:47,50) argues, it involves a "battle for consciousness": the problem, for victorious revolutions, is to prevent tradition from corroding them and ultimately defeating them from within. . .traditions are sustained and mediated by a network of particular institutions, which are actively involved in the performance of a process of transmission. it is in terns of this task that the relationship of women to revolutionary goals may be understood. what role do women play in the 'institutions of tradition' and how may a revolutionary party overcome this obstacle? a significant contribution can be made to this set of questions by drawing upon the work of gregory massell (1974). massell's intention was to study a ' revolution-from-above' in this case, the soviet union's extension into central asia (between 1919-1929), with the following questions in mind : ...how and to what extent, political power may be deliberately used in the revolutionary transformation of societies, especially those we call 'traditional' societies; conversely, how, and to what extent, traditional structures and life styles may serve as obstacles to engineered revolution, (p.xx) 66 the problems faced by the soviets in central asia were typical of traditional society: no industrial proletariat to speak of and the minimal presence of a capitalist mode of production. massell (75, 76) argues that their solutions essentially broke down into two possible responses: on the one hand, the use of force to 'excise' the traditional elites and coerce the population into compliance and, on the other, the discovery of "a weak link in society, a relatively deprived and hence potentially subversive stratum susceptible to militant appeal, a surrogate proletariat where no proletariat in the real marxist sense existed". both responses were used by the soviets in central asia, but what is interesting for the issues at hand is their perception of the weak link and its strategic contribution to the subversion of traditionalism. through an analysis of soviet documents, massell (76) demonstrates that women in these traditional moslem societies were defined as "crucial actors" whose mobilization would severely weaken the key institutions. this plan of action obviously assumes that class position was not the sole basis for expression of social conflict; rather, patriarchy vested in a range of authority relations was a key element (87-88) . chce the decision to mobilize women was taken, the task of the revolutionary party became to "maximize female discontent" and "channel" it into directions optimal to the revolutionary movement (massell, 1974:131-132). the source of the discontent was fairly clear; a quick scan of female status in traditional moslem societies gave clues as to the potential tension inherent in their roles. thus, the 'payoffs' for women in mobilization were the wide range of citizen rights not 67 previously open to them (ranging from rights to education to protection from sentence of death for illegitimate loss of virginity) . the payoffs for the revolutionary movement were not as obvious. the links between the mobilization of women and the demise of traditionalism were more implicit than explicit. this is exactly where the significance of tessell's argument to the issues raised at the beginning of this paper emerges. he articulates those linkages by demonstrating the expectations the soviets expressed through their policies and action regarding women. his analysis illustrates the leverage gained by the soviet state through the strategic use of women to destabilize the traditional regime. briefly summarized, the "payoffs of female mobilization" are (133-181): 1. liberation and humanitarian implications: the moral legitimation of the soviet movement on humanitarian grounds become an important rallying point for both appeals to foslem women (who gained personal benefits) and for the recruitment of cadres to work for the cause. 2. implications for traditional authority relations: the role network links between authority, kinship, lineage and male superiority become vulnerable when the political cohesion afforded through the female role is removed. 3. implications for kinship and community: the increased opportunities to women, the liberalization of divorce, and the stress on public participation subordinates local traditional loyalties based on clan, family and custom ties. in addition, the disruption of kinship control over sex and marriage strengthens loyalties to the new regime among women and young people. to undercut primary social units and induce 'fragmentation' makes individuals more accessible to mobilization and the society more open to penetration. 4. implications for religion and custom: to challenge the legitimacy of religious control over daily life through the subversion of islamic custom regarding women is a key to weakening the overall control of these religious institutions and their elites. 68 5. implications for property relations: the importance of the links between customs involving the female role and certain 'institutions of property* (arranged marriage, bride-price, etc.) suggests that mobil izat ion of women can weaken patterns of property controlthis is compounded with challenge to lack of control over property, including land. moreover, the new accessibility of poor males to marriage increases the latter' s attraction for the new regime. 6. implications for recruitment of labour and technical cadres: the mobilization of women involves the provision of a large, previously untapped labour pool which increases the scope of economic development and the optimal productive potential of the society. 7. implications for recruitment of political cadres: the recruitment of indigenous cadres through appeals to moslem women is useful not only in expanding party influence but also in their serving as prefigurative models of the role of women in the new society. 8. implications for revolutionary potentials abroad: this theme, more historically tied to the nature of the soviet 'satellite' system, involves the expectation that the ofttern set for women in central asia could serve as a revolutionary model for societies on its borders. the importance of massell's analysis to socialist feminists lies in his focus on the strategic use of feminist issues both to weaken the traditional regime and to strengthen loyalties to the emerging regime. again, this is not to say that 'liberation' motives played no part in their policies on women, only that these were secondary to the priorities of gaining a foothold in the society. this fact becomes even more apparent when massell documents the retrenchment and, even, reversals in policies of mobilization within two and one half years of their origin (1974:322-389). however, it is concerning the problem of explaining the retrenchment that i think massell fails. he notes that the "imperatives of insurgency are not easily reconciled with imperatives of incumbency" 69 (1974:407-408) but, when faced with the elaboration of the latter imperatives, he falls back on the idealist argument that the threat posed by radical policies of liberation to male identity , vested in tradition, created a situation of tension which was unhealthy for a regime seeking stabilization. wiile one cannot ignore this dimension of resistance, to give it causal status is, i think, misleading. it obscures the question of what set of conditions emerges when a revolutionary party is transformed into a legitimate state apparatus. it is necessary to specify the conditions under which the 'payoffs' became too costly. to do that one needs to question the role of the state in socialism, its tasks, and how they interact with the role of women in the new regime. in other words, is the new regime forced to retrench its position on women (for reasons of resistance, cultural lag or whatever) or, are there payoffs to the socialist state for retaining or reproducing particular elements of patriarchal relations? b. phase of consolidation/development as i discussed earlier, there is a lack of analysis by marxists of the role of the state in socialism. the explanation of the socialist state apparatus cannot be found, though, by merely equating the state's role in capitalist and socialist states as some convergence theorists would seek to do. the conditions within which the state operates cannot be ignored. collective ownership of the means of production and the absence of an appropriating class cannot help but have an effect on the concrete operations of the socialist state. vfriat then can one say of the requisites the socialist party faces at this phase? on a general level, what is required is the replacement 70 of the seized state apparatus with a new organ of planning and control and the replacement of engineered separation from old regime loyalties with popular support and loyalty to the new regime. moreover, it is important to recognize the broad constraints on the state in terms of its ability to meet those requisites. ch this point, miliband's discussion of the 'functions' of a state is incisive. essentially, he argues that every state must carry out the following functions, although the conditions of doing so will vary (1977:90): 1. the repressive function (the state must maintain social order within its boundaries) 2. the idealogical-cultural function (the state must engineer and maintain consent to the form of the system) 3. the economic function (used in the broadest sense, the state must sustain the population and foster productive growth) 4. the international function (the state must foster and protect the 'national* interest in international matters) the important question is how the 'nature' of socialism affects the role of the state in carrying out these functions. while it is fairly clear how the capitalist state operates as a class instrument (although we may debate its degree of autonomy) in the performance of these functions, the matter is complicated in the analysis of socialism by its economic context. as miliband (1977:114, my emphasis) notes: . . .the collectivist character of the society precludes it from being such an instrument .. .instead, the state may be taken to 'represent' the collective society or system itself, and to have as its function the service of its needs as these are perceived and defined by those who control the state . the role of the party/state (in socialism the terms are realistically interchangeable in terms of actual control) is, then, to define needs and the strategy for dealing with them. this is not to suggest that the state becomes an instrument for bureaucratic class 71 privilege although one cannot deny that privilege can accrue in this manner. rather, the state is still constrained by the "rationality of state action" in a socialist context; i.e. "statefostered economic growth... and statefostered provision of social services and cultural developments" (miliband, 1977:113-114). but, a factor which _is significant is the degree of power wielded by the apex of the socialist state in the interpretation of needs and allocation of resources to meet them. this does not imply a purposeful conspiracy of those individuals who hold the reins of state power but it does recognize the place of the state in intersecting historical material conditions through planning direction and implementing policy . certainly, one must recognize the genuine role of mass parties in socialist states, but these are parties which are "distinguished by their pyramidal structures, with an extreme concentration of power at the top of the pyramid" (miliband, 1977:115). lb return to the issue of women in this process of consolidation and development: the above discussion focuses attention on the interplay of the historically situated material conditions which socialist regimes inherit; the role of the state in intersecting the material conditions and the necessity of growth and provision of services; and the policies regarding women in the consolidation of socialism as a reflection of the conditions proceeding from the first two factors rather than from a prefigurative ideology or their role in the insurgency phase. my argument is that to talk about women's relationship to socialism is a complex matter. it requires that we first look at the conditions of taking power , its requisites and the strategic role women can play, and, secondly, look at the conditions of replacing and consolidating power , its requisites and the strategic role women can 72 play. this mode of analysis does not assume the party/state as an a_ priori monolith. quite the opposite. it suggests, to rework an old marxist adage, that socialist parties/states make history, but not under conditions of their own choosing. in other words, socialist ideology concerning women does not necessarily transform into socialist praxis towards women. case application: china i have been attempting to suggest that a focus on the stages or phases in the building of socialism in traditional societies and on their parallel requisites can lead to a better understanding of the unfulfilled promise of socialism for women. i would now like to suggest how one might make sense of particular developments in china with respect to policies regarding women. cbviously, in a paper of this scope, i cannot mount a full historical analysis of the role of women in china from the prerevolutionary period through the present. what i will attempt is a selective discussion of the broad policies of the chinese communist party (c.c.p.) relevant to the role of women. i will focus specifically on the phase of insurgency and the phase of consolidation/development. a. the phase of insurgency keeping in mind the two periods of alliance between the c.c.p. and the guomindang nationalist party (1923-27 and 1938-45), the important periods of insurgency are 1927-37 and 1945-49. tne period of 1927-33 is important as the time during which the initial collectivist soviets were established as rural bases in central and southeast china. they are especially important as a 'testing ground' for development of party policies regarding women, policies later expanded in the liberated 73 areas of northern china following the long march of 1934. mule there are many policies of significance in the insurgency period, those regarding marriage are of particular relevance. i will focus on these policies, and also make brief reference to labour and land policies. two key marriage policies in the insurgency period are the ferriage regulations (1931) and the marriage law (1934). t3] both policies contained an emphasis on: 1) freedom of choice in marriage by individuals involved 2) freedom of choice in divorce by individuals involved 3) registration of marriage and divorce with local party officials 4) responsibility of the male in divorce action to provide for wife and children (the latter remaining in custody of wife) the law of 1934 seems to have taken a qual ifed stand on divorce. [4] the restrictions placed on women who were seeking divorce from males serving in the red army are particularly interesting since such a suit required the husband's consent. as croll notes, several documents appeared during this period viiich stressed the difference between freedom and 'absolute' freedom in marriage and divorce. this was, apparently, a response to negative reaction to the law (1978:195) on the part of peasants. vrtiile recognizing that the implementation of the law was uneven, what can we say about its links to revolutionary goals at large? following is a brief summary of what i think are some of the important linkages: (i) the c.c.p. policies on marriage most certainly reflected liberation and humanitarian themes. their recognition of the impact of such practices as marriage, bride-price and widow suicide on women as individuals became an important inducement for the feminist organizations in china at that time to join with the communist cause. 74 (for discussion of this engineered alliance, see croll, 1978:117-152). (ii) the impact of the marriage law on traditional authority relations is particularly significant in china where a women was subject to three authorities in her lifetime: that of her father, her husband, and her son. the granting of unprecedented female rights disrupted that entire role network. with respect to the attack on an arranged marriage system, the law significantly affected the practice of the land-holding classes to use marriage as a mechanism for social mobility (see wolf, 1969:107). the disruption of traditional authority is particularly evident with respect to the role of confucian ideology in sustaining a hierarchy of authority. at the root of the confucian system of 'proper relations' was the notion of patriarchy, vested in the dominance of the male 'yang' over the female 'yin.* indeed, to challenge the legitimacy of this domination was to challenge the whole confucian system of authority relations. (iii) the granting of equal rights to women in marriage and divorce seriously undermined the control of the kinship system over such processes. in so doing, it undermined a crucial link between the peasants and the ruling class; namely, the clan system. as barrington moore notes (1966:207), peasant conservatism in feudal china can largely be explained through the extended kin groups, the clan. it was the one binding link between ruled and ruler and it was determined by patrilineal descent. to 'equalize' women as partners in a freely-chosen marital arrangement (including the retention of maiden name) is a direct challenge to the lineage system and the control exercised by the clan. this is even more significant when the locus of 'approval' is transferred to the c.c.p. through registration of marriage and divorce. the local officials had significant discretion in the recognition of 75 such arrangements. also important is the fact that it was the middle and upper class members of a clan who really controlled the clan itself, generally because of the importance accorded to literacy as a requisite of political poter (wblf, 1966:108-109). thus, the undermining and subordination of clan authority to party control was a blow against class authority as well. in this manner, radical reform in marriage custom provided important leverage for the c.c.p. in breaking the strong clan ties, ties which often encompassed entire villages. in addition, the new accessibility of the sexes encouraged the loyalty of poor male peasants (known as 'bare sticks') vho previously could not afford brides, and of young people in general. (iv) the impact of the marriage law on religious tradition is important with respect to the place of confucian ideology in sustaining traditional authority, as discussed above. not only did the law i challenge the legitimacy of confucian beliefs and values in relation to i women, it extended the challenge to the fundamental axis of filial duty j and to ancestoral worship (again based on patrilineal descent). (v) the links between the marriage law and property relations are quite clear. the former fundamentally challenged the tradition of females as property to be used and disposed of at will by father or husband. in outlawing arranged marriage and bride-price, it took away significant control from fathers. in liberalizing divorce, it eroded the control of husbands over their wives. in both cases, it increased the accessibility of women to the revolutionary movement, a significant consequence vhen a party is seeking the quick mobilization of individuals for revolutionary tasks. in addition to marriage policies, the linkages of land and labour 76 , reform policies to female mobilization are significant. the land reform laws[5] formulated during the period of the early soviets, withdrawn during the 2nd lhited front and expanded during the civil war period, contained one important theme, the equal right of all individuals to land allotments, and went so far as to issue separate deeds to husband and wife to specify the share of each. the impact of this law was clear in one respect. redistribution of land on an individual basis rather than on a family unit basis broke the village network apart at its base by undermining the crucial link between property and kinship and forging a new link between the individual and the c.c.p. thus, while c.c.p. documents of this time contain explicit reference to the equation of land reform and female liberation (see eavin, 1976:26-27) the more obvious consequence was the subversion of the traditional property network. this becomes clearer when one notes the refusal of the c.c.p. to extend allotments to all 'landless' women. class position of the husband was a determinate boundary. policies regarding the labour of women in the insurgency phase contained one dominant aim: the mobilization of women for the war effort. in a society dependent upon labour-intensive agriculture for subsistence, the ability to recruit military forces was directly tied to the ability to provide for the dependents left behind. tack of financial resources for 'welfare support' leaves but one choice, to replace the lost labour power. this was the primary role of chinese women in the revolutionary process, engaging in support activities for the red army. they were not recruited into combat activity. we know, for example, that only fifty women went along on the long march of 50,000 (salaff and terkle, 1970:82). in contributions other than agricultural labour, their tasks were 77 consistently of a domestic nature. this selectivity of participation was reflected in the issues dealt with by the women's congresses of this period. davin summarizes the major subjects of debate of the 1933 women's district congress as: enlarging and giving aid to the red army, caring for dependents of the latter, learning to plough, and selling personal valuables to finance the movement (1976:26). issues such as literacy, health care, footbinding, and feudal marriage were relatively ignored by these 'ffminist' organizations in the pursuit of the party priorities. for those feminists, like ding ling in 1941, who protested the subordination of these questions, the party response was that sexual liberation was already established and further feminist action was harmful to the cause (see davin, 1976:36). apparently, the strategic use of women had its limitations, imposed by party priorities. trie general labour law of this period, modelled after the soviet union labour code, did not have much impact on women's labour due to its emphasis on industrial workers, a significant minority in the liberated areas. it _i£ significant as a prefigurative version of protective legislation restricting women's labour, limiting certain industries, night work, and 'heavy' labour (see croll 1978:263-264 and davin 1976:31). also included was a policy to arrange day care services at the female's place of employment so that she might better organize her dual responsibilities. the above discussion provides, i think, some clues as to the relationship of women and revolutionary requisites in the insurgency phases in china. certainly, there were payoffs for chinese women and to ignore this fact is to do a gross injustice to the real successes of the revolution. trie equally interesting question, however, is the degree to which these payoffs were in keeping with party requisites in seizing 78 power and combatting traditionalism. the admittedly brief summary of certain policies and their links to revolutionary goals seems to suggest that feminism had its value, but only to a point. the retrenchment in divorce during the civil war, the emphasis on the war effort over particular female-specific reforms, the segregation of women from active military participation, and the extension of domestic-type tasks indicate some of the boundaries of patriarchy that the party was not willing to cross. b. the phase of consolidation/development as elaborated earlier, the essential requisites of the socialist state in this phase are the fostering of economic growth and the provision of necessary services to the population. these are carried out under the restraints of particular material conditions which the state intersects through the implementation of policies defined as necessary by those in control of 'problem perception 1 . to understand the role of women in the chinese socialist state, one must first examine the conditions under which policies regarding their role emerged. again, there is a significant body of literature addressing various developments in post-revolutionary china which time does not permit me to pursue here. rather, i will attempt to summarize what seem to have been the major shifts in policy regarding women. i will restrict the time period in question to 1953-1960, for reasons involving the 'statistical blackout' of 1961 and policy shifts and factional struggles in china since 1960 which reflect the competing models (the "two roads to socialism") which emerged in the first decade. two quite different approaches to economic development emerged in china following the demise of the new democratic period in 1953 and the 79 break with a capital isr mode of production. the first was a soviet-modelled, urban-oriented and capital-intensive strategy, the first five year plan (1953-1957). the second model was really mao zedong's version of a dual approach to economic development, the great leap forward (1958-196c) . based on mass mobilization of labour power, it stressed the simult< neous development of small-scale and large-scale industry, employing labour-intensive means in the former and capital-intensive means in the latter. these alternative strategies for promoting growth led to differing and sometimes contradictory policies on women. 1. the first five year plan the problems facing post-war china were severe: a fragmented, war-torn economy, a weak industrial base, technological backwardness and low labour productivity in agriculture, and a population of about five hundred million (see eckstein et al., 1968). with soviet guidance and support, the c.c.p. attempted a massive industrial drive by increasing the state capital investment by sixty percent by 1956, by sharply increasing industrial output, and by creating a massive in-flow to urban areas ;see yeh, 1968). the difficulties contained in this approach were the inordinate share of fixed investment in heavy industry, about eighty-six percent in the 53-57 period according to cheng (1974:55), and stabilization of the agricultural sector at low growth levels. the impact of these conditions on women was a significant retrenchment of previous policies. during the contraction of the urban market in 1955-1957, the "whole apparatus of persuasion and propaganda was mobilized to keep women out of the labour force" (howe, 1971:97). it was also in 1955 that davin notes a significant increase in women's 30 organizations known as dependents' associations, groups whose purpose was to encourage the participation of women, not as productive workers, but as wives and mothers (1976:59-61). an additional consequence of the focus on heavy industry was a decline in the state's investment in consumer goods to about nine percent of total investment (cheng, 1974:55). as weinbaum argues, the slack led to inflated consumer prices and thus to higher wage demands by state workers, lb deflect rising wage costs, the state encouraged women to engage in domestic production of consumer goods for use (weinbaum, 1976:42-43). again, women's organizations played an important role in implementing this policy. indeed, the slogan of the women's congress of 1957 became "build up the country economically; manage the household thriftily; and struggle for socialist construction" (davin, 1976:65). finally, family solidarity was an important theme in this period and divorce became increasingly difficult to obtain (see kristeva, 1975:65). the overall thrust was a resurgence in traditional female roles (including arranged marriage) during the period of urban-centered industrial expansion. by the end of the plan, industrial growth was impressive, but it was not in any way matched by growth in agriculture. intersectoral imbalances led to raw material shortages, supply bottlenecks and inadequate consumer goods provision (eckstein et al . , 1968:6). it was in the context of these conditions that the leap policy was implemented. the problem they faced was that of maintaining industrial growth in addition to fostering agricultural growth. 2. the great leap forward mao's solution, that of 'walking on two legs' was the 81 simultaneous development of agriculture and industry, heavy and light industry, and modern and traditional technology (hou, 1968:379). in a context of scarce capital, the state's solution was to use capital-intensive means in heavy industry and substitute labour for capital in other development (hou, 1968:381). the impact on the policies regarding women was clear. mass mobilization of labour power for socialist development demanded the large scale entrance of women into production. vt\at is interesting, however, is the context of their entrance. in rural areas, where male cadres significantly controlled the production process, women were overwhelmingly represented in seasonal labour and in sectors of traditional technological organization such as irrigation, reclamation and flood-control (see andors, 1976:91 and hou, 1968). in urban areas there were several consequences of significance. first, between 1958 and 1960, the state set up a state-controlled sector of urban commune cr 'street' industry. this sector employed a total of two million workers, of whom eighty-five percent were women (hou, 1968:381). organized for small-scale production of consumer goods, this sector allowed several advantages: it alleviated the state's need for consumer goods production given its low rate of investment; it brought private supplementary income into the household, lowering the necessary wage bill to the state, and, finally, it was a means of absorbing a large supply of labour in the urban area (weinbaum, 1977:43). in addition, a sectoral division of labour by sex tended to peripheral ize women into either service sectors or the traditionally organized , low investment sectors of industry (see hou, 1968) . finally, in 1959 the birth control campaign of earlier periods was halted (hou, 1968:383). apparently the strategy of using labour as 82 a primary form of capital implies a renewed emphasis on the role of women as reproducers. unfortunately, the state expected women to serve both productive and reproductive roles with no compensation and little service support for the latter. the leap period was a dismal failure for several reasons, not the least of which were a variety of natural disasters. in the years to follow, what occurred was really a power struggle concerning approaches to development. while right-wing strategists controlled the state, a reversion to social conservatism and material incentives was accompanied by a retrenchment in the role of women, including the revival of feudal customs such as bride-price in certain areas (£ndors, 1976:94). when mao regained control, a re-anphasis on leap strategies led to policies on women similar to those of 1958-60. while historical conditions obviously differed, the real patterns for fluctuating state policies on women in socialism stem from the first decade of chinese development. while an in-depth historical treatment of these periods is required to fully explore the role of the state and its manipulation of female status, i think the above discussion is suggestive of the linkages. essentially, it indicates that women are used to 'absorb 1 the costs of production in socialism. i emphasize that the tenor of this analysis is not to suggest that socialist revolution is, therefore, a dead-end for socialist feminists. certainly in china, the position of women has progressed remarkably relative to pre-revolutionary conditions. what i am suggesting is that there have also been blocks in that process toward liberation, blocks which do not seem to wither away with time or technology. the task seems to be that of articulating the process of revolution, the process of transition to socialism, and above all, our place in these processes. glib references to historical 83 inevitability can only bind us to a naive faith in the historical ocnent. ultimately, it is necessary to realize that revolution is an engineered process and, consequently, that female status is partially determined by the priorities of the engineer. notes fl] the distinction as employed here refers to the type and organization of labour performed. 'productive' refers to labour performed in the public sphere and 'reproductive' refers to labour (including actual reproduction) performed in the private sphere of the family unit. [2] it is perhaps important to note at this point that i am not concerned in this paper with the issue of conditions leading to socialist revolution in the pre-revolutionary period. rather, i am interested in the point at which the revolutionary movement is already in progress and, subsequent to success, is transformed into a socialist regime. [3] documents available in english in meijer (1972). [4] for extended discussion, see croll (1978:194-196) or davin (1976:28-29). [5] for extended discussion, see wong (1973) and hsiao (1969). hsiao also contains english translations of documents. references andors, phyllis 1976 "politics of chinese development: the case of women, 1960-1966", signs , 2(1):89-119. boggs, carl 1977 "revolutionary process, political strategy, and the dilemma of power", theory and society , 4(3) :359-393. cheng , chu-yuan 1974 china's allocation of fixed capital investment, 1952-1957 . ann arbor: michigan papers in chinese studies, no. 17. croll, elizabeth 1978 feminism and socialism in china . london: routledge and keagan pau! 84 davin, delia 1976 women work . oxford: clarendon press. eckstein, a. 1968 economic trends in communist china . w. galenson and ta-chung liu (eds.) , edinburgh: edinburgh university press. hou, chi-ming 1968 "manpower, employment and unemployment", economic trends in communist china , a. eckstein, w. galenson and t. liu (eds.) , edinburgh: university of edinburgh press. howe, christopher 1971 employment and economic growth in urban china: 1949-1957 . cambridge: cambridge university press. howe, christopher 1973 wage patterns and wage policy in modern china: 1919-1972 . cambridge: cambridge university press. hsiao, tso-liang 1969 the hand revolution in china, 1930-1934: a study of documents. seattle: university of washington press. kristeva, j. 1975 "ch the women of china", signs , (1):57-81. massell, gregory j. 1974 the surrogate proletariat . princeton, new jersey: princeton university press. meijer, m.j. 1972 marriage law and policy in the chinese people's republic . hong kong: hong kong university press. miliband, ralph 1972 marxism and politics . oxford: oxford university press. moore, earrington 1966 the social origins of dictatorship and democracy . new york: harper and row. salaff, j. and j. merkle 1970 "women in revolution", berkeley journal of sociology , xv: 166-191. sid el, ruth 1974 families of fenshang: urban life in china. london: penguin books. ?5 weinbaum, eatya 1976 "wor.e.n in transition to socialism: perspectives on the chinese case", the review of radical political economics , (1) : 24-58. weinbaum, batya 1977 "redefining the question of revolution", the review of radical political economics , 9(3):54-78. weinbaum, batya 1978 the curious courtship of women's liberation and socialism . boston: south end press. wolf, eric ?. 1969 peasant wars of the twentieth century . new york: harper & row. wong , john 1973 land reform in the people's republic of china . new york: praecer publishers. yeh, k.c. 1968 "capital formation", economic trends in communist china , a. eckstein, w. gslenson and t. liu (eds.) , edinburgh: university of edinburgh press. 86 accountable to whom? trends in managementlabour relations in local government miriam edelson this paper 'begins with a discussion of the growing financial problems facing local governments at a time when senior levels of government are intent upon following policies of fiscal restraint. it looks at the connection between the labourintensive character of services in this sector and the attempt by local government employers to reduce costs through the development of new collective bargaining strategies . public sector accreditation in legislation and the establishment of a public sector employ ers ' council in british columbia are examined in detail. the argument is that labour conflicts provoked by recent changes in the bargaining structure require unions to take a new approach which entails the building of alliances between civic workers and the consumers of public and social services . cet article s'ouvre sur une discussion des problemes financiers auxquels font de plus en plus face les gouvernements locaux au moment ou les niveaux superieurs de gouvernement appliauent des politiques de restriction fiscale . le lien entre le caractere intensif du travail dans ces secteurs et la tentative des gouvernements locaux de developper de nouvelles strategies de negociation collective afin de reduire les couts, est mis en evidence. l'examen detaille de la legislation sur i 'accreditation et de i ' etablissement d'un conseil des employeurs du secteur public en colombie-britannique , amene i 'argument que les conflits de travail provoques par les changements recents dans la structure de negociation imposent aux syndicats d 'adopter une nouvelle approche favoricant les alliances entre les employes de ces secteurs et les consommateurs de services publics et sociaux. alternate routes vol. 5 1982 96 introduction in late january of 1981, civic workers in british columbia's lower mainland region went on strike. public employers asserted that they could not meet workers' demands because of inadequate funding. private employers complained of potential spill-over effects to their enterprises if the workers' demands were met. neither protest was without some justification. they did little, however, to illuminate the issues which were really at stake. in recent years, pressure for the restraint of government spending has grown dramatically. cutbacks have occurred in a wide range of public services. restraint policies have also had a profound impact on public sector labour relations. it is the purpose of this paper to examine developments which have taken place in state workers' bargaining as a result of the changing economic and political climate of the past decade. what constraints do employers face? what interests are actually served via public sector settlements? how should public sector bargaining evolve in the future? a satisfactory answer to questions such as these would require a comprehensive historical and economic analysis of public sector bargaining. such a study might include, for exarcile , an investigation into labour legislation and the impact of widespread unionization. further, it would have to look at the development of the state sector and at how certain responsibilities have been shifted between jurisdictions. the focus of the present text is, of necessity, more modest. in an attempt to assess more precisely what changes public 97 sector collective bargaining has undergone, the paper begins with an investigation of local state finances and the constraints facing employers at this level. two trends exemplified in british columbia, toward employer accreditation and public sector employers' councils, are then considered. specific reference is made to why, in political, ideological and economic terms, the state and capital have initiated changes in the bargaining system. of particular interest is how the balance of class forces has conditioned the state's ability to transform its structures. the paper concludes with an inquiry into the 1981 civic strike in british columbia and some speculation as to how public sector workers and their unions may respond to the disturbing trends highlighted in this study. the crisis of local government finance while all levels of government have experienced financial problems in recent years, it appears that such problems have been most severe at the municipal level, a major reason for this being the disparity that exists between the constitutional responsibility of local school boards and municipalities to provide public services and their ability to raise revenues. local governments are expected to provide a wide variety of services, including primary and secondary education, police, fire and ambulance services, social services and daycare, among others. unlike provincial and federal governments, however, local taxes are derived from only two sources: corporate and property taxes and school taxes. in 1978, these taxes accounted for 39 per cent of the total gross general revenue. another alternate routes vol. 5 1982 98 source of municipal revenue is the sale of goods and services, especially water, license and permit fees, and fines. in 1978, these accounted for some 10.5 per cent of total gross general ] revenues . the major source of revenue to municipal governments, accounting for over half of total revenue, is transfers from higher levels of government. in 1980, the federal government transferred 296 million dollars directly to municipal governments, primarily as payment in lieu of local property taxes. the provinces transferred 11,475 million to local governments, part of which came indirectly from federal transfers to the provinces. the provinces also transferred an additional 7,741 million dollars to pay for the hospital system (statistics canada, 1977). during the same year, local government expenditures amounted to 21,335 million dollars. the combined federal and provincial transfers accounted for 55.2 per cent of local government expenditure. this figure has risen since 1970, when federal and provincial government transfers as a proportion of total local government expenditure was 47.8 per cent (statistics canada, 1977:12). even with an increasing proportion of total local expenditure paid for by transfers from higher levels of government, local governments have consistently faced budget deficits. in 1978, the local government deficit (for all canada), even including intergovernmental transfers, was 565 million dollars. if the intergovernmental transfers are excluded from the deficit calculation, the figure would be 10,062 million dollars ( prov incial and municipal finances , 1979:4). clearly, 99 even with substantial support through transfers from other levels of government, local expenditure far outstrips revenues. the share of total government spending by local governments has decreased in recent years. in 1965, local government expenditures constituted 27.3 per cent of total government expenditures. fifteen years later, in 1980, they accounted for only 21.3 per cent. at the local government level, education is by far the largest expenditure item. in 1978, it accounted for almost 42 per cent of total gross general municipal expenditure. expenditure on health and welfare amounted to 7.4 per cent in the same year ( provincial and municipal finances , 1979:46). these services fulfill a function which is not of a particularly "local" nature. schools and health clinics, for example, are among the public institutions for which local governments are particularly responsible. although administered by the local state, they meet economic, political and social requirements not limited by municipal boundaries. the logic of the capitalist system requires that the state, at some level, provide these services because they play a central role in reproducing the labour force. in essence, state-funded programs amount to costs incurred by the public for private benefit. they ensure the stability of the system and perpetuate labour's subordinate position to capital. that education, health and welfare are among the services most dependent upon funding from senior levels of gevernment is not surprising, given their general importance to the system. in 1976, they represented 63.5, 80.3 and 54.5 per cent, respectively, of local governments' specific purpose transfers. alzevnate routes vol. 5 1982 100 the degree to which these services are funded by the provincial governments points to one of the most difficult problems facing local governments. as demand for local services has increased, higher levels of government have had to step in to help fund these programs. in addition, local government has been used to implement programs, especially social services, initiated at the provincial level. as policy and funding is increasingly centralized at higher levels of government, local officials find themselves inundated with extensive policy guidelines. although local representatives are charged with providing their communities with certain services, they have less and less autonomy in terms of program design and the specific details of their operations. yet, it is precisely the locally elected municipal councils and school boards which are seen as responsible for the extent and quality of services and which feel the pressure most directly from local residents. for example, provincial governments' decisions to reduce the level of daycare spending have serious repercussions for local communities; yet, public protests are most often directed at municipal and regional councils which administer the actual cutbacks in services. this fact points to two problems: first, under current cost-sharing arrangements, there is a great deal of confusion as to who is responsible for providing what services and, moreover, where the political "buck" ultimately stops. second, because it is most accessible to community residents and is viewed as responsible for local services, the local state is open to considerable public criticism for decisions over which it has little control. 101 local governments are, then, caught in a financial squeeze. even, -where the will to do so exists, they have a limited ability to raise the revenue they need to fund programs properly. they do not control the levels of grants made available by the provincial and federal governments. to raise additional revenues, they must increase local property taxes, something they are reluctant to do for fear of repercussions from the electorate and the business community. even councils not entirely controlled by developers and small business interests tend to be fearful of increasing taxes since they do not want to discourage private investment in their communities. the resulting revenue shortfall, coupled with the structural problems outlined above, points to the serious nature of the fiscal crisis facing the local state. 1. the local state as employer the fact that a considerable number of decisions regarding local government services are made by senior levels of government has a profound impact upon municipal budgets. it also has a direct effect upon the size and composition of the local labour force. this is because appoximately 70 per cent of canadian local government revenues (excluding spending requirements for debt service and education) are devoted to the employment of personnel (mcallister ,1979 : 13) . since 1976, federal and provincial governments across canada have been following restraint policies and, by reducing the level of transfers to municipalities, they have been able to enforce these policies at the local level as well. keeping down wage costs is one way that public administrators try alternate routes vol. 5 1982 102 to keep expenditure levels in line with revenues. public sector bargaining becomes an arena in which governments attempt to "manage" the crisis. employers face many constraints peculiar to the state sector. these constraints, or, more precisely, structural problems, are two-fold: first, unlike private companies, public institutions are unable to pass on the cost of wage increases by raising prices. their revenues originate primarily in the form of taxes and raising taxes is a delicate undertaking, particularly in terms of a potential electorate backlash. public officials tend to consider such repercussions during contract negotiations with their employees. second, work in this sector is largely labour intensive. productivity increases tend to be low and unit labour costs high. it is very difficult to bring about significant increases in productivity or to reduce spending on wages and benefits by introducing new technology. teaching is not readily automated. health and social services require human contact. consequently, the cost of public services tends to rise faster than in the private sector where technology can more easily be substituted for labour. public employers at all levels face these constraints in attempting to meet their labour costs. widespread unionization of public employees has had a double-ed^ed impact upon municipal management practices. although workers unionize in order to improve their wages and conditions of employment, unionization has also entailed certain advantages for public employers. formalized labour relations, generally, ensures a degree of standardization which may be helpful to the elected officials' 103 task of managing public funds. for example, collective bargaining in the canadian legal framework (e.g. the grievance procedure and job evaluation and reclassification) leads to certain forms of workplace regulation which promotes labour discipline. bargaining at regular intervals according to predetermined rules also provides public officials with reliable and centralized administrative procedures. at the local state level, however, the advantages which unionization affords employers are mitigated by the very character of the services workers provide. if we distinguish between the traditional services provided by local government (e.g. sewage systems, roads, land-use planning and public utilities) and the more recent expansion of services directed more precisely to community residents (e.g. welfare programmes, recreation and child care facilities) this point becomes especially meaningful. the explicitly reproductive character of this latter group of services presupposes a substantial amount of direct contact between employees and the public they serve. the parent who drops her/his child off at the community daycare centre each morning, for example, is likely to be familiar with the problems which the staff and centre face. it is less likely that an unemployment insurance recipient would be aware of the problems confronting workers in the unemployment insurance commission offices. this kind of contact creates the possibility for the people who provide services to work together with those who use them against threats to their community's social programs. further, local politicians have traditionally been responsive alternate routes vol. 5 1982 104 to interest groups represented in their communities due, in part, to the short length of their terms of office. the combined effect of these two factors is that the elected officials, as employers, are potentially vulnerable to pressures from public service workers in coalition with users of services. this is not to suggest that municipal employers are at the mercy of the unions, although it would be a mistake to underestimate the potential of campaigns organized by public employees in conjunction with the public they serve. the existence of such "pressure points" within the local state reflects its distinct quality among public employers. it is this distinctive quality, however, which poses a further problem for both union and management. when the workers are able to force local governments to accede to their demands, the latter must often attempt to obtain additional funding from higher levels of government. where this has been possible, substantial gains have been made (e.g. ottawa-car leton battles for daycare funding during 1980). but, where no additional funding is forthcoming from provincial or federal coffers, or where funding has been cut, demands by workers and the users of services are less likely to be acceded to by locally-elected representatives. during the last five years, the latter pattern has become increasingly common. yet, the challenge presented bv well organized union and community political campaigns remains a potent one. the task of attempting to manage the fiscal crisis, coupled with labour's access to certain pressure points, has forced public emplover? to develop new collective bargaining strategies. 105 contract negotiations have been more coordinated and centralized. new structures have been established to assist local government employers in resisting campaigns mounted by unions. the effects which unionization of the canadian municipal sector have had on public budgets and labour relation practices, explored briefly below, will provide a basis for analyzing the character of the state's response. 2. canadian municipalities public employers have developed a more sophisticated approach to labour relations as part of their attempt to manage the fiscal crisis. centralizing compensation data and coordinating bargaining strategies for employers in certain sectors has been part of the effort to rationalize public services. as early as 1962, the canadian federation of mayors and municipalities (cfmm) conducted a wage survey of employees in that sector. their findings emphasized municipal employers' need for better negotiating information. the unionization of many of their employees had required that they be better prepared. as the forword to the cfmm wage survey (1962:12) outlined : the widespread introduction of collective bargaining in the municipal public service has, from the point of view of municipal governments, made the matter of municipal personnel administration infinitely more complex. questions relative to wages, salaries and conditions of employment, formerly decided by unilateral action, must now be resolved through the process of collective bargaining. this development has made it necessary for municipal governments to become fully conversant with the skills and techniques involved in negotiations between employer and employee organizations. moreover, the nature of this bargaining process is such that municipal governments, as employers, must have available a wide variety of comparative information alternate routes vol. 5 1982 106 on wages, salaries and working conditions. evidently, municipal employers were aware that they would encounter more formidable opposition with the advent of widespread collective bargaining. what was perhaps less clear then was how increased labour costs, combined with their inability to raise revenues independently, would affect their budgets. by 1971, the cfmm was calling upon the federal government for substantial increases in municipal funding. in a brief presented to the prime minister that year it argued: a general goal must be to attain a proportionately larger allocation of the nation's revenue resources for municipal governments. where municipal governments have attained the capacity to initiate, plan and carry out comprehensive community building programs -programs aimed at a sound balance of social, economic and physical development -substantial increases in unconditioned grants should become general practice. its message was clear, if unheeded. rising expenditures and increasing directions from senior levels of government as to how monies were to be spent were becoming a source of contention. the creation of new bureaucratic labour relations structures is one means by which the state has attempted to lessen the impact which fiscal constraints have had on local governments and communities. how the state responds: the british columbia example british columbia is the canadian province in which the state and capital's strategy for managing the economic crisis has been least subtle. this is especially cbvious with respect to public sector bargaining. british columbia's economic and historic background explain in large part why the struggle there between labour and capital is so little disguised. 107 the province's economy is primarily resource -based , with canadian, american and japanese ownership of the mining and forest industries. in 1979, these two industries accounted for just over 40 per cent of the provincial gross domestic product. markets in the united states, japan and europe are supplied with coal, indrustrial metals and paper. labour has historically been powerful with 49.2 per cent of the nonagricultural work force unionized as of 1980. in the same year, the total for all of canada was only 37.6 per cent (wood and kumar, 1980). that capital's moves to counter workers' bargaining power would be most sophisticated in the north american jurisdiction with the most highly organized workforce comes as no surprise. during the 1970's, for example, two significant additions were made to the public sector bargaining scene in british columbia: public employer accreditation and the establishment of an employers' organization for the public sector. each of these attest to the seriousness with which both capital and the state have responded to labour's challenge. i will comment on each of these initiatives in turn, with specific reference to how and why new bargaining structures have emerged in the present political and economic context. 1. accreditation british columbia is the only canadian province which has legislation providing for employer accreditation outside the construction industry. accreditation means that workers no longer bargain exclusively with their own employer. rather, the legal relationship in a collective agreement is between alternate routes vol 5 1982 108 the employers' organization and the employees of each of its members. an accredited organization has the right to make policy which is binding on all of its members. individual employers may even decide to relinquish the day-to-day enforcement and administration of their collective agreements to the "expertise" of the accredited body. british columbia is the only province where public sector employers may form accredited organizations. unions such as the canadian union of public employees (cupe) have argued that employer accreditation is inappropriate for the public sector. they suggest that public sector officials abdicate all responsibility for decision-making when they join an accredited organization (cupe, 1978) . labour relations is removed from local jurisdiction and taken over by a body created expresslv for that purpose. that accredited body, staffed by hired labour relations experts, is one step further removed from the electorate. as such, it is less susceptible to public concern or pressure. one of the most vocal advocates for employer accreditation to be generalized beyond the construction industry was the british columbia employers council. formed in 1965, this association is composed of both private and public sector members >.cupe , 1 978 : 51) . in november 1979, it had about 150 members in total, including 110 corporate members, crown corporations, and 27 major bargaining associations (list, 1979: 88). it makes no attempt to conceal the fact that accreditation enhances the bargaining strength of employers. the council's 1970 annual report was blunt: 109 early in the year the council strongly supported legislation to enable employers' accreditation. subsequently enacted in the b.c. legislature it has resulted in considerable strengthening of the bargaining position of many of our member associations (cupe, 1978 : 51) . for the public sector specifically, the implications of accreditation are profound. accreditation of public employers has one central objective, the establishment of bargaining structures designed to strengthen employers, especially those historically weak due to lack of negotiating expertise or their responsiveness to public opinion. the state, by adopting labour legislation to allow public employers to form accredited bodies, effectively maximizes the employer's advantage. the private sector's ability to influence municipal and school board bargaining through accreditation is evident in the following ways: first, the establishment of centralized, professionally administered accredited organizations enhances its ability to place pressure on public employers to keep public sector settlements in line with or below those in the private sector. private sector employers want to keep public sector wages depressed as this will improve their competitive position in the labour market making it easier for private employers to attract skilled people. more important is the determination of capital to keep the global costs of public services down. it seeks to avoid increased tax burdens which might erode its profits. low public settlements, in the view of capital, contribute to minimizing the drain on public coffers and they have a significant impact on the overall level of wage settlements, some tending to depress private sector increases as well. by restructuring public alternate routes vol. 5 1981 no sector bargaining, accreditation served to meet these objectives . public employer accreditation, with its explicit antiworker bias, is not, however, always easily achievable in political terms. in certain communities the result of extensive union campaigns bringing public pressure on municipal councils has been that councils have refused to participate in accredited bodies. in november 1978, for example, vancouver city council voted 8 to 1 against the greater vancouver regional district (gvrd) labour relations committee proposal to join an accredited organization. vancouver's decision followed similar actions taken in burnaby and surrey (cupe.1978 : 1) . elected officials were made accountable for their decisions regarding labour relations. local councils, vulnerable to pressure brought to bear upon them by their constituents, were forced to reject proposals which might have proven useful in the short term. this example is interesting because it illustrates how pressure points within the local state may be manipulated. moreover, it demonstrates the contradictions which rest within "the state", most broadly defined. in this specific instance, popular pressure forced the municipal government to take an autonomous stand by rejecting initiatives emanating from the private sector and higher levels of government (i.e. the gvrd). in essence, it shows how the state's ability to adapt its structures, even when bolstered by the demands of capital, is conditioned by the balance of class forces. 2. public employers of british columbia a second illustration of how the state adapts its ill structures to meet challenges posed by a highly organized labour force was the creation by the british columbia government in june, 1977 of the council of public sector employers (calvert, 1979:165-167). established just before the 1975 wage controls program ended, the council's main function was to keep public sector wage settlements in line with those in the private sector. modelled along the lines of the british columbia's employers council, it was the first (and remains the only) provincial council of public employers in canada. on june 7, 1977, british columbia finance minister, evan wolfe, announced that the new council would be given a budget of 1.25 million dollars and would command a staff of fifty people (vancouver sun , july 28, 1977:21). it would be a voluntary organization, including the greater vancouver regional district, the british columbia school trustees association, health labour relations association and british columbia hydro, in addition to provincial government employees. in a speech given in january 1977 wolfe stated: in the area of wage increases, governments have a special responsibility to ensure that compensation levels for public employees do not run away from those in the private sector... i wish to announce the establishment of a new organization -the british columbia council of public sector employers -to provide better coordination and exchange of information of public sector wages among public service employers in the province. this is not a new bargaining agency. its purpose is to encourage the development of a fair and equitable correlation between private and public sector compensation packages in b. c . " fcupe , 1977 : 25) ? 3 by april of 1979 the council boasted that its members employed 200,000 workers or 45 per cent, of the province's unionized workforce (calvert , 1979 : 165167) . in addition to the direct grant of public funds, they were given unlimited access to alternate routes vol. 5 1982 112 government -paid computer facilities. brian foley, who had worked as director of the job evaluation department for the public service alliance of canada, and then headed the public sector compensation division of the ant i -inflation board, was hired as executive director of the council (calvert , 1979 : 165) . the council has three main functions: to conduct research on collective bargaining, to coordinate the negotiating strategy for its members and to foster cooperation between public and private employers. in its research capacity, data on every public sector wage settlement in british columbia is collected. in cooperation with the british columbia employers council, it also collects data on key private sector settlements. settlements are analyzed, using the average comparability on total compensation (actc) , a concept devised by the federal anti inflation board to help employers compare the costs of everv component of their collective agreement with other agreements throughout the province. in its coordinating capacity, the council holds regular monthlv meetings to exchange information, conducts training programs to ensure that their negotiators are conversant with the latest bargaining techniques, and formulates a provincewide bargaining strategy for its members. it also attempts to coordinate the timing of negotiations so that the strongest employers establish pace-setting agreements (calvert , 1979: 165-167) . it is not surprising that employers would seek to strengthen their position in anticipation of demands they expect labour to make during the post -controls period. that the british columbia government took explicit steps in that direction, 113 demonstrates their cognizance that british columbia labour had some ability to make its demands stick. the decision to set up the council also reflects, in two ways, the state's capacity to adapt its structures to meet the corporate sector's unmitigated demand for conditions favourable to the accumulation of capital. first, the notion of employers councils relies fundamentally upon pluralist ideology which assigns equal strength to labour and management. in this framework, the two sides confront one another with the same resources and authority. bargaining is merely a technical exercise, with equally-matched opponents vying for points. the british columbia government's decision to devote public funds to the creation of such an organization was publicly justified in terms of the need to rectify an alleged imbalance between the two sides, an objective broadly embraced as beneficial to society at large. a closer look at the logic employed suggests, however, that the two sides are not equal. labour does not control public budgets, set taxes, dictate production standards or working conditions. neither does it make investment decisions, control how the workplace is organized or decide how new technology is implemented. in all of these areas, and most others with the exception of what the union is able to explicitly limit through the terms of the collective agreement, management alone has control. the notion of management control is at present no different in the public sector than that exercised by private employers. acting (not surprisingly) without any critique of alternate routes vol. s 1982 114 the dominant pluralist ideology, the british columbia government set up a council which could only serve to institutionalize and further entrench habitual managerial practices. its primary effect was that public employers were urged, and indeed compelled, to drive hard bargains with public service workers. all conceivable research and negotiating techniques were placed at the employer's disposal. the government's readiness to devote public funds to the council, apparently without any regard for its questionable effects in terms of labour relations, demonstrates clearly how the state socializes costs in order to guarantee private benefits. the state's penchant for incurring public costs to ensure private benefits and its readiness to adapt its structures in order to bring this about is revealed in a second way. the existence of a public sector employers' council means that locally-elected representatives no longer make decisions at the bargaining table. instead, labour relations decisions are shifted to a purely technocratic realm. hired experts, appointed rather than elected, make crucial decisions regarding the disposition of community funds. one result is that a local government's accountability to its constituents is severely undermined. the council's experts, rather than elected officials, may decide to minimize labour costs and significantly alter the character of public services which a community offers. creating a publiclyfunded , but unaccountable, organization of public employers constitutes a transference of authoritv within the state, away from elected officials into administrative hi or technocratic hands. in the process, local officials are stripped of an important governing function. the long term repercussions, in terms of local control over the quality of social programs are considerable. once again the state's policy, motivated by its preparedness to act on behalf of private over public interest, contributes to the weakening of local democracy. with labour relations removed to a strictly technical level, the local community's ability to put pressure on elected officials is eroded. relieving the local state of its vulnerable position vis-a-vis the electorate is an effective means of forestalling the potential threat that labour wields. in effect the british columbia government had committed itself, at public expense, to erect a more sophisticated collective bargaining system for the public sector. judging from its structure, mandate, and choice of executive director, the council's purpose was obvious: to place pressure on employers to keep public sector settlements in line with, or below, those in the private sector. using the same rationale outlined in the previous section regarding comparability of the two sectors and the determination to keep the global costs of public services down, this aspect of the council's thrust was paramount. employer's positions would be bolstered at the bargaining table and the threat posed by a highly organized labour force reduced. labour's ability to represent its members effectively would be minimized, thereby encouraging disillusion in the ranks and threatening union solidarity. acting with such a pernicious mandate, it could only be expected that the alternate routes vol. 5 1982 116 council would dramatically affect the negotiating process. in february 1979, executive director, brian foley, suggested in the council's newsletter that public employers be wary of unions' ability to produce "colourful and eyecatching comparison charts/graphs that 'demonstrate' the inferior position 'suffered' by their membership" (foley ,1979 : 18 , 1 9) . foley, writing with more than a bit of cynicism, was familiar with these practices from his days at the public service alliance. he went on to explain that the public employer must not "be swayed by the simplicity of the data presented and he must especially not allow his elected representatives to develop opinions based solely on the data presented by the union" (foley ,1979) . his obvious intent was to counter the ability of the union to educate and thus, to influence, local state representatives. in 1979, the council changed its name to the "public employers of b.c." early that year, the minister of finance for the province, evan wolfe, sent a memorandum to all public sector employers in the province in which he reiterated council's purpose of devising coordinated bargaining strategies and centralized collective bargaining information and research. he emphasized the need to rationalize employers' labour relations activities and to avoid unnecessary duplication. wolfe also stipulated that council would receive full funding of 400,000 dollars in 1979 but would be urged to move to a cost-sharing arrangement to ensure that it be "fully effective, responsible and accountable to its members" (olsen, 1979) . the letter ended with a reaffirmation of the minister's support 117 of council's mandate to "enable public sector employers ... to attain fair and equitable levels of compensation relative ^to the private sector and to each other" (wolf e , 1978) . stated explicitly in a covering letter from the pebc chairperson, j.n. olsen, was the government's desire to: "allay mistaken fears that the council (would) function either as a post controls monitoring agency, or participate in the collective bargaining process" (olsen, 1979) . the 1979 decision by the british columbia government, ostensibly to withdraw as council's funding source, points to some interesting trends. the impact of the pebc in terms of shifting responsibility for labour relations decisions and the effect on local democracy is not unlike that of the accreditation legislation described previously. the council, due to its facilitating role and voluntary nature, was perhaps more palatable in political terms but, in a fashion similar to the controversy surrounding public sector accreditation, the pebc was unable to escape criticism. the british columbia canadian union of public employees research bulletin documents specific cases in which municipal councils, subject to extensive union and public pressure, rejected requests that they affiliate to the pebc. cupe further suggested that council was trying to reduce its dependence upon the provincial government for fear that, under a future new democratic party government, it would be dismantled (cupe, 1979:4). on one level, such fears may have constituted ample reason for the government's decision to reduce its funding commitment. more significantly, however, is the state's alternate routes vol. 5 1982 118 demonstrated tendency to withdraw itself from any role which might leave it isolated in political terms. reacting in part to public pressure, the state had to create the appearance that it was not culpable. once again, such trends illustrate how state initiatives to establish bargaining structures designed to strengthen employers are conditioned by the ability of the working class to effectively press its own interests. like employer accreditation, the creation of the pebc was a means by which the bargaining power of local state employers, in particular, could be expanded. as suggested above, maximizing advantage for public employers fulfills certain objectives held dear in the private sector. that the provincial government established the council is testimony both to the challenge posed by a highly organized workforce and to the heightened stakes between iabour and capital in a period of economic crisis. 3ritish columbia lower mainland civic strike, 1981 the main concern of this paper has been to demonstrate how the state has had to adapt its approach to public sector labour relations in order to counter both labour's bargaining power and its potential for engaging in explicitly political struggles. the 1981 british columbia lower mainland civic strike illustrated many aspects of the trends pointed to in the foregoing analysis. in the following pages we will explore the main strike issues and evaluate their significance in terms of the exigencies of capital and their consequent impact upon the local state's negotiating position. 119 1. the demands in late january, 1981, more than 11,000 civic, library and school board workers went on strike. lasting up to 15 weeks in some jurisdictions, the strike revolved around three main issues. the first was a substantial wage increase for all employees. the second issue was a much more radical demand for "equal pay for work of equal value" between the predominantly female clerical workers and mainly male outside municipal workers. the union argued (but did not, with a few exceptions win) , that the base rate for outside and clerical workers be the same. they demanded further that the current practice whereby clerical workers have to pass through extensive increment steps to reach full pay be abolished (cupe,1980). the third issue was put forward by the employers. it was to replace the existing sick leave plan with a weekly indemnity plan. this would have had. the effect of forcing employees to pay for short term sick leave costs. and it would have allowed private insurance companies to profit from providing insurance coverage . "equal pay for work of equal value" (epwev) is an issue which has, in recent years, reached the forefront of human rights legislation. its supporters argue that work traditionally performed by women is low-paid and will continue to be, so long as women are crowded into a few occupational ghettos and employers can offer low salaries with the knowledge that women will take these jobs. especially in a period of high unemployment, the ghettoization of women in low-paid work will continue. at this time, only the federal and quebec governments have alternate routes vol. 5 1982 120 enacted legislation that requires employers to pay workers epkev. the contentious element of the issue is the basis on which "equal value" is determined. the canadian human rights act, section ii (2) stipulates that: in assessing the value of work performed by employees employed in the same establishment, the criteria to be applied is the composite of the skill, effort, and responsibility in the performance of the work and the conditions under which the work is performed. job evaluation systems can be used to assess value according to these criteria, but such systems are not, themselves, free of bias. they were not established with an aim to eliminate sex discrimination. for example, a system may give skill points for driving a car, but not for preparing food, though both skills are learned off the job (bell, 1981). further, as long as employers retain the right to define and modify what tasks and responsibilities are included in particular jobs, attempts to compare dissimilar jobs may be easily thwarted. the union's demand, supported by both clerical and outside workers, was to redress the discrimination where it begins, at the entry level to the workforce. the employer's proposal that the workers' benefit plan be restructured was a "take-away" demand. in effect, the gvrd requested that workers give up their severance pay and sick leave banks in return for a combination of three insurance plans; medium term sick leave, long term sick leave, and long term disability insurance. the employer offered to increase the coverage of these insurance plans and to pay the full cost of the latter two. in return, workers would have to pay the 121 full costs of short term sick leave. the gvrd estimated, but could not guarantee, that the new sick leave fund would cost employees approximately two per cent of their gross earnings. research by the canadian union of public employees claimed that the cost to workers would be closer to six per cent of their gross earnings. cupe argued further that the loss of the present sick leave plan, whereby workers receive full payment of wages from the first day of illness, would be a major disadvantage not outweighed by the other components of the employer's benefit proposal. specifically, the real cost of sick leave is the replacement cost of workers hired to fill in for ill employees. since employers frequently do not replace absent workers, however, the actual cost is often zero. under the gvrd scheme workers would automatically pay an absent employees' wages, even if the employer did not hire a replacement. in financial terms the employers would stand to make substantial gains. in non-monetary terms, the employer would also benefit from having engineered a system whereby workers would end up policing each others' use of sick leave (cupe, 1981 : 4-6) . management's control would be enhanced and union solidarity effectively threatened. that cupe completely rejected the gvrd proposal is not surprising. it seems possible that the employer, aware that the union would never give in on sick leave, left it on the table until the very last minute in order to ensure that the strike was prolonged. 2. what was really at stake a careful examination of these demands suggests that more was at stake in this strike than first meets the eye. alternate routes vol. 5 1982 122 in both cases, the extent to which private business articulated its interests and thereby influenced public employers' deliberations was notable. equally striking was the provincial ministry of labour's virtual silence during the controversy. further, the pebc had a relatively low profile during the strike, even though it was one of the most significant public sector disputes since the council's inception. observations such as these raise important issues in terms of management practices in the public sector and the question as to whom local state representatives are actually accountable. with respect to the sick leave demand, two problems stand out. first, central to the gvrd benefit proposal was the fact that private insurance companies stood to make substantial profits because a great deal of new business would be generated. the gvrd stated explicitly in a memo drafted on october 29, 1981, that total administrative control over benefits would be placed in the hands of the employer. they also would decide which insurance carriers to use (cupe , 1981 : 11 ) . second, one of the major public justifications for the restructured benefits package was the gvrd's own estimate that it would save taxpayers 1.3 million dollars (vancouver sun , jan. 29 , 1981) . by means of a high profile advertising campaign in the local media, the employer used its budgetary woes to justify regressive bargaining demands. in essence, the employer's sick leave demand amounted to two things: the taxpayers were promised savings and the insurance companies were promised profits. private interests were also at stake in the dispute over "equal pay for work of equal value". cupe's strongest 123 opposition came from the british columbia employers' council. william hamilton, president and chief executive officer of the council, sent letters to municipal and school board employers throughout the lower mainland area. in a letter to gvrd labour relations committee member, john parks, dated march 12, hamilton made clear his organization's concern over the epwev issue. he was quite frank in writing: to grant these inside workers similar starting rates as outside workers without having an exhaustive examination (of whether the jobs are equal) will have a serious rippling effect throughout your administration and thereby a negative impact upon taxpayers and other employers. he closed by offering the gvrd (and other public employers) any assistance they might require and reaffirming "the support of the members of (the) council in rejecting this union demand" (hamilton, 1981) . it is not surprising that the private sector feared epwev. no doubt the potential costs involved gave impetus to the direct involvement of the employers' council. disseminating their views widely in a high profile campaign, the council was the union's single most vocal opponent. they strongly endorsed the gvrd position, notwithstanding broad -based support for cupe's demand among trade unions and women's organizations. constant pressure through letters and newspaper advertisements was put on public employers not to enshrine the epwev principle in their settlements. the stance taken by the gvrd and ably supported by the province's representative of capital is interesting in two ways. as mentioned earlier, the federal government and the province of quebec have already legislated (if imperfectly) alternate routes vol. 5 1982 124 equal pay for work of equal value. other provincial and local governments have been reluctant to follow suit. it seems that state employers, divided in terms of jurisdiction, lack a cohesive position on the question. this point is instructive in that it belies the notion that the state sector "at large" operates in a homogeneous fashion. in the case of public sector labour relations, the interplay of class forces with the limits set by employers' fiscal constraints, is critical. in certain instances, pressure applied by unions may bring about progressive changes in legislation. in others, workers are unable to compel their employers to accede to similar demands. while it is likely that gains made in certain sectors eventually become generalized, the timing of such a process is not predetermined, equal pay for work of equal value legislation is currently inconsistent from one jurisdiction to another. the civic workers in the lower mainland did not fully succeed in this strike. their ability to make employers confront the issue directly during the next round of negotiations will depend in part upon whether the union decides to sustain a broad-based campaign dealing with the issue. moreover, labour's ability to force capital to pay the costs involved directly out of their own surpluses, and not through some scheme that socializes the cost of their wage bill, is even less predictable. the second point of speculation regarding the epwev controversy deals more with the mechanics of the negotiations. the gvrd is a member of the british columbia employers ' council . it is also a member of the pepc. representatives of the gvrd 225 labour relations committee normally attend weekly negotiators' coordinating meetings sponsored by the private sector council (thompson, 1981). during the strike, these meetings would have provided for valuable informationsharing and strategy discussions. clearly evident is the intimate involvement of representatives of private capital in public employers' deliberations. moreover it suggests a plausible explanation as to why the gvrd ' s negotiating stance was so consonant with managerial practices typical of the private sector. as discussed in a previous section of this paper, normal managerial practices can serve to deny the uniqueness of the public employer's role. the accountability of the gvrd labour relations committee (an appointed body) to its constituents is uncertain. at minimum, the close interplay between the gvrd's negotiators and the british columbia employers' council during the strike raises the question as to whom the civic officials were really answerable . the rather autonomous role played by the employers' negotiators had very specific effects on the character of negotiations. in one case, evidence suggests that gvrd negotiator graham leslie, intervened directly in one municipality's negotiations. surrey, which is not a member of the gvrd was poised for a settlement in early march which would have enshrined the epwev principle. at the last moment, management's proposal was pulled from the table (ward, 1981; thompson , 1981b) . the fact that an independent municipality which was prepared to accede to the union's demands would be subjected to such pressures is a graphic revelation of the most pernicious aspect alternate routes vol. s 1982 126 of local state's new bargaining's character. elected representatives, stripped of the political responsibility integral to their function as employers, were hindered from taking a progressive step in meeting the union's demands. in jeopardy, as a result, was the representative character of the civic government. considering the trends outlined throughout this paper such threats to local state democracy can only be expected to increase. in closing this discussion of the civic strike, a series of questions emerge. why was the pebc virtually silent on the epwev issue during the strike? what positive role might the provincial government have played in resolving the dispute? could the provincial human rights commission have been instructed to intervene? would a new democratic party government have taken the same (non) position as the socreds? the answers to these questions are not, for the moment, obvious. what i£ clear is that the stakes involved in the civic strike were considerable. as the pebc's reference report of may 29, 1981 stated : the issue of equal pay for work of equal value will certainly cause changes in the economic, and no doubt, the social fabric of the country ... unions are not waiting for legislation but are demanding action already. the issue is upon us. the time for preparation is now. the character which the preparation will take, for either labour or capital, is not entirely predictable. but in light of the present fiscal crisis and its consequent impact upon the nature of public sector bargaining, the struggle can be expected to be a bitter one. 127 conclusion throughout this paper, public sector collective bargaining has been viewed in terms of its location in the struggle between labour and capital. forces giving impetus to state initiatives and those provoking popular protest have also been considered from this perspective. in each instance, our central concern has been to demonstrate the existence of a dynamic relationship between the hegemony of capital and the ability of workers to advance their interests successfully. if we judge labour relations in the state sector as a coherent or static process, it is difficult to foresee many improvements for public sector members. although there has been no paucity of defeats in recent years, as suggested above, such a pessimistic judgement would be a mistake. since the state does not operate in strict accordance with some infallible internal logic struggles against attempts to dismantle the public sector must have many independent, if related, facets. in the current context, british columbia labour was unable to block the establishment of the public employers of british columbia. neither were they effectively able to counter the british columbia employers' council's highly-orchestrated onslaught during the civic strike. such josses need not remain etched in stone. earlier in this paper, i posited the notion of "pressure points" within the local state. these may be manipulated toward specific reforms by popular movements. though admittedly circumscribed, the local state does command a degree of political leverage. popular -based struggles in alternate routes vol. 5 1982 12". defense of public services can be generalized beyond city limits. in the absence of an alternate economic strategy, such efforts will have only limited consequences. in conjuction, however, with a broader program for reform including specific measures to overhaul the municipal tax structure and the election of municipal officials who are critical of senior governments' restraint policies, conflicts at the local state level would take on greater meaning. unions may not be prepared to extend their sights beyond narrowly-defined collective bargaining issues. clearly, technical approaches to bargaining are not exclusive to the management contingent. reforms sought through political action, demanding both quality public services and improved conditions for workers, can be threatening to a union's own entrenched bureaucracy. but the presence of such resistance (and it i_s there) does not make such struggles inconceivable. campaigns for equal pay for work of equal value, for example, will require systematic pressure on many fronts. employers must continue to be confronted at the bargaining table. human rights commissions in all provinces must be pressured to develop enforceabl e policy. unions will have to devote substantial resources to building active and broadbased colalitions including woking people, women's organizations and citizen groups. governments must be compelled not to assume through public funds the costs of correcting sex-based wage discrimination. there is no guarantee that strategies to defend the public sector designed along these lines will be successful. 129 in fact, the odds in the short run seem pretty heavily stacked. as the examples cited in this study have suggested, however, the state's ability to adapt its structures is not absolute. the process of transforming public sector bargaining, just one aspect of the state's attempt to manage the present economic crisis, is not invulnerable to counter vailing pressures. how, in precise terms, labour will exploit the potential avenues open to it is not yet certain. as the losses at stake for public service workers and their organizations become even more ominous, it can only be hoped that they will not retreat from a most formidable challenge. postscript: april, 1982 in the period since this paper was written, the situation facing british columbia labour has become more acute. most noteworthy, of course, is the provincial government's imposition of wage controls on public sector workers. it is no accident that such a move coincides with the attempt by large numbers of female workers to achieve substantial "catch-up" wage increases, based on the principle of equal pay for work of equal value. the hospital employees union, representing some 24,000 workers across the province, has made the issue a central bargaining demand in its current round of negotiations. the 40 , 000-member british columbia government employees union is also entering negotiations with a similar demand for its lowest paid clerical workers (the pacific tribune .march 5,1982:3). also, the gvrd workers' contract expires at the end of this year. with controls holding wage increases below the rate of alternate routes vol. 5 1982 130 inflation and no provision for allowing settlements that would end wage discrimination, it is unlikely that these demands from workers will be met in the short term. initial indications from the unions, however, are that they will continue to fight for equal pay for work of equal value, wage controls notwithstanding. the direction and form that this struggle takes will warrant our attention in the coming months. notes 1. figures based on calculations from data found in provincial and municipal finances (toronto, canada tax foundation, t579) , table 3-7 "gross general revenue estimates of local governments by province, 1978:45. 2. excluding a very small amount (.03 and .01 per cent of total local government expenditure) paid by local governments to provinces and hospitals, respectively. 3. department of finance, economic review (ottawa: ministry of supply and services, april 1981), reference table 70, "allocation of expenditures by level of government before and after transfer payments 1926-1980: 194. 4. my calculations are based on provincial and municipal finances (1979 ed . ) tables regarding education, heal th and welfare spending by local governments: 216,202 and 243. 5. publicly-owned corporations and the institution of user-fees are exceptions to this. in addition, local utilities exercise some discretion with respect to hydro-electric power and the sale of water. 6. central statistics bureau, ministry of industry and development of small business, victoria, british columbia . 7. research department, canadian union of public employees, "employer accreditation in the public sector", submitted to the british columbia ministry of labour (february, 1978). cupe has a series of briefs dealing with this subject which provide historical data concerning accreditation, in addition to critical analysis. 131 references bell, gail 1981 "equal pay: nothing to do with need". vancouver sun , april 15, 1981. calvert, john 1979 "b.c. council of public sector employers: using our money to cut our wages". the facts , canadian union of public employees, ottawa, april, 1979, vol. 1, no. 10: 165-167. canada t?x foundation 1979 provincial and municipal finances 1979 . toronto . canadian federation of mayors and municipalities 1962 survey of wages and working conditions of municipal employees . 1971 brief to the government of canada . april 26, iwtt. canadian union of public employees 1977 employer accreditation in the public sector . 1978 employer accreditation in the public sector . 1979 b.c. council of public sector employers gets facelift , but policies renain the same . june, 1979, vol.2, no. 4. 1981 "raises not roses: vancouver clerical workers strike for equal pay." the public employee , spring, 1981. foley, brian 1979 "the problem faced by the public sector employer -determining where he really stands." newsletter , b.c. council of public sector employers, february 2, 1979, vol.2, no . 4 . hamilton, william 1981 lette r to john parks . march 12, 1981. list, wilfred 1979 "b.c. employers' council: model of co-operation' the globe and mail, october 12, 1979:38. 17,2 mcallister, anne 197 9 an approach to manpower planning and management development in canadian municipal government. toronto., trie fnsti tute for public administration in canada. olsen, j.n. 1979 memorandum to all publ j c sector employers , province of british columbia . janunary , t979. public employersof british columbia fpebc) j 981 reference report , no. 67, may 29, 1981. statistics canada 1977/1981 national income and expenditure accounts . catalogue 13-001, ottawa , ministry of supply and services, august, 1977 and april 198]. the pacific tribune 1982 equal pay a victim of bennett wage control . march, 5, 1982:3. the vancouver sun 1977 new government group rapped by volrich . july, 1977:21. 1981 cupe hints at b.c. -wide strike january 29, 19jtt 1981 the facts about the civic workers ' strike . gwd advertisement, february 10, 198t~: thompson, joey 1981a "gvrd strikers gear for long fight". vancouver province , february 17, 1981. 1981b "talks fail and civic dispute drags on." vancouver province , march ]7, 1981. wolfe, evan 1978 concerning the goals and objectives of the british colunusia council of ' public sector employers . letter to all british columbia publ ic sector employers. december, 1978. wood, w.d and pradeep kumar (eds) 1980 the canadian industrial relations scene. kingston, queen's university press . 133 community colleges and the division between mental and manual labour david robinson poulantzas ' (1978) analysis of the contribution of the educational apparatus to the reproduction of the division between mental and manual labour is elaborated upon to provide a theoretical framework for examining community colleges in terms of their relationship to the capitalist labour process. the thesis is that community colleges legitimize political relations in the labour process by defining the knowledge of graduates as inferior to the knowledge of university-educated workers trained in comparable specialities . community college programs designed for engineering technicians are discussed in seme detail and a number of suggestions for future research are advanced. alternate routes vol. 5 1982 288 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times book review state power and democracy: before and after the presidency of george w. bush, by andrew kolin. new york, new york: palgrave macmillan, 2010. $85.00 u.s., paper. isbn: 978-0-230-10935-3. 262 pages. reviewed by: brandon tozzo1 did america under george w. bush become a police state? andrew kolin’s book traces the centralization of control in the presidency at the expense of congress and american democracy. kolin argues the extreme security measures taken during the bush administration are not unique in american history, but part of a longer trend to limit democratic institutions and curtail individual rights and freedoms. according to kolin, under the bush presidency america became a police state. the administration used measures to quell opposition through the usa patriot act, and tortured enemy combatants in military prisons. while kolin provides a compelling account of the immoral and–under american law–illegal policies before and during the presidency of george w. bush, the book makes a less persuasive argument that this led to the elimination of domestic american democracy. the first chapters provide a brief historical account of the consolidation of political power in the executive branch. starting in the 19th and early 20th century, the american government used the police to investigate political opponents, such as black rights groups, communists, and women’s rights advocates. with ascendancy of the united states after world war ii, this increased in scope with the formation of the federal bureau of investigations (fbi) and the central intelligence agency (cia). the external threat of the cold war and the conflict in vietnam led to the american executive using the cia and fbi to infringe on the legal rights of american citizens. though many facets of the police state started with nixon in order to repress protest, it has culminated with george w. bush’s response to the terrorist attacks of september 11th, 2001. the strongest part of the book is the evidence that the american executive is allowed free rein to conduct foreign policy. other domestic institutions and social forces such as congress, the media and the public 1  brandon tozzo is a ph. d. candidate in political economy at queen’s university (kingston, ontario, canada). book review: state power and democracy | 289 ignore or are indifferent to the extreme measures taken by american presidents dating back to richard nixon. among the most alarming recent abuses were the use of torture in guantanamo bay and the iraqi abu ghraib prison, and the policy of extraordinary rendition to kidnap foreign nationals. all the while, the presidency insulated itself from criminal liability and congressional oversight. kolin goes into great detail to outline the lack of accountability for the military and the cia when it carries out presidential orders, and the need for substantial changes in the way america conducts its foreign policy. moreover, kolin outlines how american institutions failed to limit the actions of the bush administration in fighting the war on terror, a problem that continues under president obama. however, kolin’s argument that the bush administration has instituted a police state in america is less persuasive. a significant issue is that several key concepts are left unclear throughout the book, such as ‘police state,’ ‘democracy’ and ‘mass democracy’. this is not necessarily problematic–terms and concepts can vary depending on time and location–but there needs more discussion why concepts shift throughout the book. since the definitions are vague, it often obscures their meaning. for example, there is no discussion of why mass democracy movements such as the black panthers and the socialist party are favourable to american democracy, while others such as the religious right and tea party are not, since they are both mass movements albeit with different agendas. also, there is little comparative historical analysis of police states. if the united states has developed into a police state under george w. bush, then some caparison between it and other obvious police states such as maoist china, stalinist russia, and north korea under kim ilsung would have strengthened the book’s analysis and provided a more explicit conceptual framework. more substantively, the bush administration’s elimination of american internal democracy and subversion of the constitution is less convincing when examining contemporary resistance movements in the united states. kolin argues the bush administration took radical measures to eliminate formal democracy in reaction to the september 11th terrorist attacks through the usa patriot act for warrantless wiretaps, and imprisoned and deported over 6000 muslim non-citizens. however many muslims detained after 9/11 returned to the united states and sued the bush administration for compensation. even some of the more controversial pieces of legislation –such as the warrantless wiretaps -have been struck down by the courts showing that formal democracy 290 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times may not have been entirely subverted. such legal recourse does not exist in guantanamo bay or in abu gharib. moreover, despite the actions of the bush presidency to limit dissent, there were mass social movements against the invasion of iraq and throughout his presidency. the book shows the bush administration did go too far restricting liberties in the war on terror against enemy combatants, but there was more domestic dissent than presented. many social groups and formal institutions such as activist groups, the courts, congress and the media combated the extremism of the bush presidency. so unlike foreign policy, domestic political forces in the united states had the ability –albeit with varying degrees of successto contest the extreme policies of the american president. kolin’s book is an effective warning to readers that the media, congress and the courts, and social forces must work to prevent the executive from abusing its power and control over america’s foreign policy. without the public forcing american institutions to keep watch, the president can commit illegal or immoral acts in the name of security. this book is recommended for those interested in a comprehensive, and thorough, overview of covert actions taken by the cia and fbi before and during the bush presidency, particularly in reaction to the september 11th terrorist attacks. book review: the people’s lawyer | 273 book review the people’s lawyer by albert ruben. new york: monthly review press, 2011. $17.95 us paper. isbn: 978-1-58367-237-2. pages: 1-200. reviewed by rania tfaily1 “my job is to defend the constitution from its enemies. its main enemies right now are the justice department and the white house.” (bill goodman, legal director of the center for constitutional rights, 2001) for about five decades, the center for constitutional rights (ccr) has waged significant legal, educational and public awareness battles to defend marginalized communities and to uphold rights guaranteed by the u.s. constitution and the universal declaration of human rights. since its inception, it was dedicated to progressive politics, social justice and social change. it branded itself as being in the service of the people’s movements whether it is civil rights, women’s rights, war against vietnam, and more recently campaigns against torture, renditions and indefinite detention. the ccr cases often set legal precedents. however, the impact of the ccr varied with times. during the 1990s, it suffered from a financial crunch that intensified tensions between the board and staff. these tensions which have been brewing for a number of years culminated in the staff’s seven weeks long strike. after a period of decline, the ccr saw its fortunes and profile increase following 9/11 and the war on terror which resulted in human rights violations of thousands of arabs and muslims. the center’s decision to defend the right to habeas corpus of guantanamo detainees was a turning point given that the crc often focused on civil cases, and it tended to represent people with whom it usually shared a common (leftist) political vision. the ccr’s decision to take on the government of the u.s. during a time of high patriotic fever was not without its risks, and a number of individuals and organizations withdrew their financial support. after a definite defeat in two lower courts, the center’s legal effort culminated in a surprising and significant win in 1 rania tfaily is an assistant professor of sociology in the department of sociology and anthropology at carleton university, ottawa. 274 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism rasul vs. bush in which the u.s. supreme court ruled 6 to 3 that guantanamo detainees have the right to access the federal courts. the ccr’s budget rose from $1.2 million in 2001 to $5.5 million following this crucial victory. albert ruben takes us through a condensed history of the ccr, from its humble beginnings to help lawyers in the south who were challenging racial segregation and the disenfranchisement of the voting rights of african americans, to its involvement in women’s rights movement, antiwar activism and more recently its defense of victims of the war on terror. ruben shows how the ccr pioneered the creative use of the law by adopting novel and often untested arguments to launch legal battles along with educational campaigns with the purpose of facilitating social change. the ccr defined success not only in terms of winning cases and setting legal precedents but also in terms of its ability to raise public awareness and galvanize social movements. ruben provides us with detailed synopsis of the lives of the center’s four founding fathers – arthur kinoy, morton stavis, william kunstler, and benjamin smith. he shows the significant impact that a handful of hardworking, motivated and committed professionals and activists can make. ruben’s book includes a detailed chapter about the ccr’s most significant cases classified under “international human rights and solidarity”, “government misconduct”, and “attacks on dissent”. it is obvious that ruben highly values the ccr and the fighting spirits, motivation and dedication of its founding fathers and staff. nevertheless, he exposes the struggles and the difficulties encountered in running the ccr. he does not shy away from including unflattering characteristics of the founding fathers. “the people’s lawyer” is a valuable contribution detailing the history of one of the most progressive american organizations. it also depicts work-related challenges that face progressive organizations that do not wish to conform to the capitalist/ corporatist work model. these include monetary compensation, decision-making process, board-staff relations, and gender and generational tensions. the book raises the important question of how best to facilitate social change and whether channeling the struggle through the courts and its lengthy litigation defuses and sets back social movements. on this point, however, it fails to provide a clear assessment and position. the book is written in a lively and engaging manner. it is definitely an interesting read for lawyers, activists and social scientists. however, the narrative of the book goes back and forth between different time book review: the people’s lawyer | 275 periods and different issues. in addition, it does not adequately address the social, political and legal context that prevailed in the united states at various periods. i would have appreciated a more chronological history coupled with an analysis of whether the ccr’s successes in the 1960s, 1970s and 1980s were byproduct of the social and political turmoil engulfing the united states at that time. this is relevant as one ponders the future of the ccr and the ability to challenge oppressive laws through the courts given the changing social and political environment. the dramatic (and negative) changes in the u.s. justice system have included draconian sentencing, expansion of state surveillance, increased prosecutorial power and particularly diminished judicial authority and oversight. the increase in the power of prosecutors (often at the expense of judges) coupled with draconian sentencing means that the accused (often poor and marginalized) are almost always compelled to accept plea bargains even if they were innocent since the consequences of convictions are severe. about 90% of criminal cases end in plea bargains without trials. recent journalistic articles in the new york times and the washington post paint a very dim picture of the u.s. justice system which is characterized by concealing exculpatory evidence, framing and entrapment, evidence manipulation, incompetent and flawed forensic analysis, and prosecutorial misconduct. as we contemplate the future of progressive organizations such as the ccr, it is important to take into account that the u.s. justice system is becoming increasingly repressive and that it is becoming harder to achieve significant social change through the courts. alternate routes science as capitalist ideology: the sociology of max weber reconsidered randle w. nelsen abstract max weber's sociology is viewed within the conteat of the changing socio-economic arrangements of his time. in attempting to develop a value-neutral sociology by creating a superhuman sociologist, weber in fact creates the persistent capitalistic valuebias of a sociology which reproduces the major characteristics of socio-economic reforms initiated by bismarck and his immediate successors. this bias makes capitalism interchangeable with bureaucracy, and the crucial "social-political problem" becomes the development of independent political leadership rather than the unequal distribution of profits among socio-economic classes. as with his super scientist, weber creates as problem-solver a super agent of change, the charismatic political leader, whose charisma becomes routinized to help ensure the continued capitalistic domination which weber's sociology supports. introduction max weber's sociology, in order to be most fully understood, should be viewed within the context of the changing socio-economic arrangements of his time. in germany, as in the united states, the transition from laissez faire to corporate capitalism contributed to, and was accomplished during, a period (c. 1865-1900) of severe 34 capitalist ideology economic disturbances (engels 1887-88; williams 1966). l the task of bringing stability to the german economy during the last third of the nineteenth century became in large part the responsibility of one man — germany's most charismatic leader prior to adolph hitler, chancellor otto von bismarck. this paper argues that the sociology developed by weber can be linked to the socio-economic reforms initiated by bismarck and his successors -reforms which were, like weber's sociology, favorable to the development of capitalism in its new corporate form. bismarck's reforms joined the interests of the more liberal professional and middle classes into which weber was born and the more conservative upper-class junkers with the interests of german workers. he promised direct universal vote in the election of parliament and worker security with a government-sponsored insurance program. he also endorsed and protected limited incorporation and trade combinations. the combined effect of these reforms was to provide bureaucratic support for an emerging corporate capitalism made synonymous with allegiance to the fatherland --a combination of factors that constitutes the central focus of weber's scientific sociology. 4 ironically, in his attempt to eliminate value bias by creating a superhuman sociologist capable of separating scientist from citizen (political) self, weber in fact creates the persistent capitalistic value bias that characterizes his sociology. in attempting to neutralize his analysis by maintaining a distinction between the 35 alternate routes socio-economic policy of politics and the objective requirements of science, weber attempts to provide scientific respectability for a sociology harmonious with, and subservient to, the new corporate arrangements of bismarck's nationalistic capitalism. specifically, weber's science serves as an attempt to legitimize capitalism because it makes bureaucracy as a form of social organization equivalent to, and interchangeable with, the existent division of labor produced by modern capitalism (giddens 1972). thus, through a process of substitution, bureaucracy rather than capitalism, the development of independent political leadership rather than the fact that one class profits by the labor of another, becomes the central problem of the german socio-economic order (see cohen 1972 and wright 1974-75) scientist weber provides citizen weber with a solution to this problem, the leader with charisma. however, in the final analysis, even this agent of change -the charismatic political leader -attempts to provide individualistic opposition to the status quo by working from within bureaucracy/capitalism, cooperating with the privileged social strata in cooling (routinizing) charisma. weber's faith in the charisma of a super change agent -the logical extension of, and counterpart to, his super scientist -is transformed into a faith in prevailing socio-economic arrangements. in brief, the salvation urged by weber's sociology helps ensure the continuation of capitalistic domination. 36 ' capitalist ideology bismarck, the junkers, and weber: an emphasis upon administrative efficiency bismarck created governmental policy without bothering to consult the great majority of the governed; he simply made decisions for them. the german tradition had long supported leadership of this type. in his summary of the germans' "war of liberation" against napoleon in 1813, a. j. p. taylor refers to this legacy of executive rule: . . . thus germany passively endured the war of liberation, just as previously it had endured conquest by the french and before that the balance of the system of westphalia. the allies defeated the french, but they could not undo the effects of french rule; and they had to devise a new system for germany which would serve the interests of europe, as previously the napoleonic system had served the interests of france. the people of germany were not consulted. they could not be consulted. as a political force they did not exist. [taylor 1945, p. 46] fifty years later bismarck was engaged in developing an increasingly self-serving power with which he could make sure that most germans still "did not exist" as a political force -a power that was soon to make him, as imperial chancellor, the chief administrator of his "new system for germany." during bismarck's rule weber, born in 1864, was maturing as a liberal intellectual. weber's father, who came from a financially secure family of textile manufacturers in western germany, was a successful lawyer and national-liberal parliamentarian; his mother, "a woman of culture and piety whose humanitarian and religious interests were not shared by her husband" (bendix 1962, p. 1). what weber's parents did share was their active involvement in attempting 37 alternate routes to increase the political influence of a declining liberalism. their house served, for the first twenty-nine years of weber's life, as a meeting place for the coalition of prominent politicians and professors from the university of berlin responsible for developing liberal opinion -that opinion which was so easily dominated by the autocratic rule of bismarck. this domination was made possible by skillful administration of a tariff system that restored the financial security of prussia's aristocratic landowners, the junkers. bismarck's administrative skill permitted him to develop what appeared to be a policy of national unity, while in actuality he was fashioning an economic reality in accordance with his now-famous statement to one of the liberals in 1848: "i am a junker and mean to benefit by it." the junkers were somewhat unique as an aristocratic class of landholders in east prussia. in contrast with the landowners of western europe, they were not a leisured class (see shuster and bergstraesser 1944, pp. 58-59). as owners of colonial lands they worked their estates themselves, without tenants: . . . the junker estates were never feudal; they were capitalist undertakings, which closely resembled the great capitalist farms of the american prairie -also the result of a colonial expropriation of the american indians. the junkers were hardworking estate managers, thinking of their estates solely in terms of profits and efficiency, neither more nor less than agrarian capitalists. [taylor 1945, pp. 28-29] in brief, the prussian junkers were "too poor to afford the aristocratic luxury of unbalanced accounts; and they brought to the 38 capitalist ideology affairs of state the same competence as was demanded on their own estates" (taylor 1945, pp. 60-61). thus, it is not surprising that the prussian tariff of 1818, which gave at least moderate protection to the junkers, marked the beginning of the first tariff system in all of europe. to return to the description of the junkers offered by taylor (1945, p. 61), "it was their application at the office desk which kept them afloat" as europe's most durable, hereditary governing class. the junker emphasis on administrative efficiency was the distinguishing characteristic of the professional and intellectual middle classes into which weber was born. it was these classes that still dominated the relatively small towns of germany in 1848, the year the german masses revolted against the military monarchies in vienna and berlin. these uprisings, the response of the unemployed to germany's first general economic crisis in winter 1847-48, led to a centralizing of power and the calling of a national assembly at frankfort. the work of this assembly revealed and strengthened the administrative tie that permitted the liberal, middle-class professionals to unite with the more conservative, upper-class junkers to dominate the german masses. the bonds of this liberal union -a union to which weber was later to lend scientific legitimation in his writings on social science methodology and bureaucracy -were cemented by force. the frankfort liberals, lawyers and professors, wanted to create a united germany by consent. however, as the class analysis of karl 39 alternate routes marx (1851-52, especially p. 71) clearly shows, they were frightened of the "disorder" being created by the revolutionary masses; consequently and paradoxically, the liberals increased their own vulnerability to the decisive power of the armed state by turning away from politics of consent to support the repressive activities of the armed forces as being essential to their cause of national security. as a commissioned officer, weber also considered the armed forces essential to this cause. his reliance on persuasion by force was made clear in a speech delivered to the 1907 congress of the verein fur sozialpolitik . speaking of the future of the social democratic party weber issues this warning: ... if the party seeks political power and yet fails to control the one effective means of power, military power , in order to overthrow the state, its dominance in the community and in public corporations and associations would only show its political impotence more distinctly, and the more it thought to rule simply as a political party and not objectively , the sooner it would be discredited. [mayer 1955, p. 65] weber's year of military training in 1883-84 had turned his initial condemnation into objective admiration of the requirements of military discipline. converted by his training experience to believe that the body works more precisely when all thinking is eliminated, weber apparently found considerable appeal in this partitioned view of men; taking leave from his university studies, he returned to strassburg for summer exercises in 1885 and again in •87, and participated in more military maneuvers a year later in posen (see gerth and mills 1946, p. 8). some twenty-five years 40 capitalist ideology later he was anxious to march at the head of his company in a world war about which he said: "in spite of all," it was " a great and wonderful war" (gerth and mills 1946, p. 22). while his health would not permit his participation as a leader of a company, he did serve from august 1914 to the fall of 1915 as a disciplinary and economic officer in charge of operating nine hospitals in the heidelberg area. with the peace of 1918, weber called upon "the designated war criminals" among germany's political leaders to offer their heads to the enemy as compensation for the mistakes they had made in conducting the war. his hope was that this offering would restore prestige to the german officer corps he so dearly loved -a love clearly shown in this answer to a favorite student's question concerning his post-war political plans: "i have no political plans except to concentrate all my intellectual strength on the one problem, how to get once more for germany a great general staff" (mayer 1955, p. 107). weber's emphasis on the importance of developing this general staff supported the cause of the liberals, which was also that of the junkers -namely, the protection of the capitalistic socioeconomic arrangements by which they were profiting. thus, the frankfort assembly's answer to the riots of the unemployed in the cities, and the more widespread general uprisings which followed, was a government without power to change existent socio-economic conditions. the central power legitimized by the frankfort assembly, 41 alternate routes referred to by marx (1851-52, p. 56) as "the parliament of an imaginary country," gave every appearance of having all the qualities of government; however, the imperial constitution creating this government was "a mere sheet of paper, with no power to back its provisions" (marx 1851-52, p. 114): ... as to the legal force of the decrees of the assembly, that point was never recognized by the larger governments, nor enforced by the assembly itself; it therefore remained in suspense. thus we had the strange spectacle of an assembly pretending to be the only legal representative of a great and sovereign nation, and yet never possessing either the will or the force to make its claims recognized. . . . thus the pretended new central authority of germany left everything as it had found it. [marx 1851-52, p. 54] when bismarck became the central power he, like the frankfort liberals of 1848, created a hollow government. however, it was a hollowness of a different kind in that it stemmed not from a lack of centralized power, but rather, precisely the opposite condition -that is, bismarck's administrative ability to efficiently consolidate and concentrate power which flowed from his own position as imperial chancellor. bismarck's socio-econoraic reforms: the administration of corporate economic unity the government fashioned by bismarck provided an illusion of power widely-dispersed. it was based on bismarck's 1866 proposal to establish a german parliament elected by direct universal vote, the junkers, perhaps the weakest and most reactionary group in 42 capitalist ideology germany at that time, were forced to accept this proposal in order that they might appear to be aligned with policy that was both powerful and progressive; thus, they were placed in a "ruling" position by bismarck while at the same time, they were being made accountable to him. so too were both the professionals and merchants of the middle classes and the working class who endorsed the proposal and accepted junker rule; the former were promised continued prosperity through the reinforcement of ties that strengthened their bond with the junkers, while the latter was convinced that the vote would bring social security. "the only loss was freedom, and that is not an item which appears in a balance sheet or in a list of trade union benefits" (taylor 1945, p. 108). 9 freedom to the liberals of the middle classes became transformed, under junker rule, from a desire for "liberal government" into a wish for "liberal administration." thus, the administrative talent of the prussian general staff that directed the war of 1870, became, under bismarck's direction, ever more efficient at achieving liberal demands without relinquishing power. as with the parliamentary proposal of 1866, bismarck initiated reforms designed to maintain the reality of his autocratic rule by retaining the image or appearance of pluralism. this was accomplished, as the following description makes clear, by encouraging development of the corporate capitalism upon which the liberal-junker alliance was based. the bismarckian order of 1871 had a simple pattern: junker prussia and middle-class germany, the coalition which sprang from the 43 alternate routes victories of 1866 . . . between 1867 and 1879 the german liberals achieved every liberal demand except power: ;ind in germany the demand for power had never bulked large in the liberal programme. never have liberal reforms been crowded into so short a period. . . . germany was given at a stroke uniform legal procedure, uniform coinage, uniformity of administration; all restrictions on freedom of enterprise and freedom of movement were removed, limited companies and trade combinations allowed. it is not surprising that in face of such a revolution the liberals did not challenge bismarck's possession of power: he was carrying out their programme far more rapidly than they could ever execute it themselves. [taylor 1945, pp. 122-123] endorsing limited incorporation and trade combinations, bismarck tied his own position of power and the security of the liberals' middle-class status position ever more closely to the development of capitalism in its new corporate form. thus, the end of the free trade era -heralded by the 1873 financial panic which marked the beginning of severe depression in germany and the rest of europe, and in the united states as well -was met by bismarck's policy favoring development of the kartells that fixed prices and regulated production during the 1880s. while the liberals received governmental support for industrial consolidation, the new capitalism required bismarck -somewhat against his will, because it was a step towards the greater germany he was resisting *" _-to further stabilize emerging socio-economic arrangements by implementing a policy that would protect the junker position. the moderate tariff of 1879, and the much higher tariffs of the 1880s, lessened the possibility that the newly-built railways of russia and the american continent could provide enough cheap grain to destroy german agriculture. in brief, 44 capitalist ideology it was a policy that not only made secure the junker position, but it also created allegiance to bismarck on the part of small farmers in east prussia; they, much more than the junker managers of large estates, needed protection. this protection, the method by which bismarck retained and strengthened his control over the liberals, junkers, and small farmers, was soon extended to the working class -the wage laborers. in exchange for their liberty -their freedom to oppose bismarck -between 1883 and 1889 he established for german workers a compulsory insurance program against sickness, accident, and old age. this program of social security was yet another indication of bismarck's administrative genius; not only did he manage to organize worker security at no expense to the state -it was subsidized for the state by employers and the workers themselves -but he also used the good will engendered by the program to collaborate with his rivals and eventual successors, the social democrats (see roth 1963, especially pp. 212-248). bismarck's administrative legacy : the bethmann conscience and weber's sociology the new chancellor of 1890, general leo von caprivi, carried on the bismarck tradition by giving empha; is to efficient organization and administration. while caprivi 's integrity was incorruptible, he was also politically inexperienced. his government, often ignoring the fact that power remained centralized in relatively few hands, 45 alternate routes was barely able to avert several potential economic crises -the army law renewal of 1893 is probably the most well-known example -by administering at least temporary unity among the various socioeconomic classes. caprivi's successors, prince chlodwig hohenlohe and then prince bemhard von bu'low, placed even more emphasis upon, and were considerably less discreet about, creating economic unity. bulow's germany of 1900 was searching for "world policy" that would provide an outlet for the overproduction of a rapidly maturing industrial capitalism; and the chief accomplishment of bulow's administration was that his minister of finance, johannes von miquel -a frequent guest in weber's parents' house -quite simply was able to buy, with the high tariff of 1902, the support of the prussian junkers for the reich. bulow's successor in 1909, theobald von bethmann-hollweg, was, even more markedly than bismarck and his other predecessors, an administrator. the descendent of a frankfort family that had for generations supplied the state with bureaucrats, bethmann became a civil servant who exemplified the "objective" bureaucrat-statesman that weber's sociology idealized. thus, while bethmann has been described by taylor (1945, p. 160) as "cultured, sympathetic, honest, he ran over with good intentions," it was his administration that most truly fulfilled bismarck's "blood and iron" promise of 1862 by leading germany into world war one and military rule. . . . all he lacked was any sense of power; and so it came about that this 'great gentleman' became, through his very irresponsibility, 46 capitalist ideology responsible for the agadir crisis, for the military violence at saverne, for the violation of belgian neutrality, for the deportation of conquered peoples, and for the campaign of unrestricted submarine warfare -crimes a good deal beyond bismarck's record, all extremely distasteful to bethmann, but all shouldered by his inexhaustible civil servant's conscience. it was useless, one night say dishonest, for him to have a high character: his sin was to belong to a class which had failed in its historic task and had become the blind instrument of power which it could not itself master. bismarck had said in 1867: 'let us put germany into the saddle. she will ride'; but in reality he had been the rider and germany the horse. now bethmann threw the reins on the horse's back. [taylor 1945, p. 160] the bethmann conscience that helped shape max weber's germany is precisely what weber advocates and encourages as he develops his sociology. the violence that resulted from bethmann' s attempt to be value neutral is herein viewed as nothing more nor less than weber's attempt to transfer the supposed objectivity of his science to bureaucracy. the result was a scientific equation that attempted to link the social organization of bureaucracy with the socio-economic arrangements of a nationalistic corporate capitalism -to make capitalism as value-neutral as weber believed bureaucracy was. such objectivity was, among other things, to form the core of the kind of education weber thought necessary to reconstruct war-torn germany. in a 1918 letter addressed to a frankfort colleague he writes: " 'objectivity' (sachlichkeit) as sole means to achieve pureness and the feeling of shame against the disgusting exhibitionism of those who are morally broken down --only this will provide us with a firm attitude ..." (see mayer 1955, p. 65). for weber, this objective 47 alternate routes attitude was fostered by the supposedly value-neutral social organization of bureaucracy and he celebrated, patterning his science after, the increasing efficiency with which modern government from bismarck to bethmann was able to exclude "love, hatred, and every purely personal . . . feeling from the execution of official tasks" (see bendix 1962, p. 483). l2 weber's objectivity: scientific schizophrenia in his essay on " 'objectivity' in social science and social policy" weber argues that "it can never be the task of an empirical science tc provide binding norms and ideals from which directives for immediate practical activity can be derived." [weber (1904) 1949, p. 52] "existential knowledge" is to be distinguished from "normative knowledge" -what "is" must be separated from what "should be." [weber (1904) 1949, p. 51] for weber, scientific analysis cannot directly evaluate the appropriateness of a given goal or end, but only the appropriateness of the means for achieving that end. [see weber (1904) 1949, pp. 52-54] in order to maintain this view that social science ("the analysis of f.icts") cannot directly address questions of social policy ("statement of ideals") weber introduces a scientific rationality that permits the sociologist to detach, at least partially, science from its cultural context. thus, weber's sociologist is allowed to consider, and be influenced by, cultural surroundings only in the initial stages of research and only on the condition that motives and afi capitalist ideology values remain "scientifically oriented." ... in social sciences the stimulus to the posing of scientific problems is in actuality always given by practical "questions." hence the very recognition of the existence of a scientific problem coincides, personally, with the possession of scientifically oriented motives and values. . . [weber (1904) 1949, p. 61] as research progresses, this cultural influence that initially helps to determine the scientific problem can be, in weber's view, carefully controlled by the social scientist. capable of distinguishing between "scientifically oriented" values and "normative standards," weber's sociologist uses scientific wisdom to separate empirical from normative self -the objective-scientist self leaves questions concerning social policy to be answered by sentimental-citizen self: ... it should be constantly made clear to the readers (and -again we say it -above all to one's self!) exactly at which point the scientific investigator becomes silent and the evaluating and acting person begins to speak. in other words, it should be made explicit just where the arguments are addressed to the analytical understanding and where to the sentiments . . . [weber (1904) 1949, p. 60] in this manner weber reasons a scientific schizophrenia that permits the sociologist to develop a value-relevant understanding of social reality without making value judgments, [see weber (1904) 1949, pp. 55-56] the result is a sociology that is shaped by weber's efforts to be value neutral -to separate his scien:ific from his political (citizen) self. this separation can be viewed as an important heuristic device aiding weber in exploring and explaining the rationality of his scientific methodology. this separation can also be viewed as 49 alitknait kuuitb being largely responsible for prohibiting weber from sufficientlyexploring and explaining the logic of the way in which value judgments influence the practice of social scientists. in failing to attend to this matter of value rationality weber is unable to adequately understand either the content of, or be clear about when he is moving between, the two selves and their respective worlds which he creates. ironically, then, it is precisely the movement between these two worlds, a separation weber made with the intention of eliminating bias, which accounts for the persistent value bias that characterizes his sociology -namely, his scientific support of capitalism. schizophrenic objectivity and weber's capitalism = bureaucracy equation the science that allows weber to distinguish between and separate means from end, fact from value, objective knowledge from emotional action as he moves between his scientist and citizen worlds also facilitates a separation sf the economic from the political. this dichotomy permits weber in defining power--"the possibility of imposing one's will upon the behavior of other persons" (see rheinstein and shils 1954, p. 323) -to make a further distinction between voluntary agreement and authoritative imposition. [weber (1925) 1947, pp. 148-149] it is this split which in turn forms the basis for weber's distinction between interest groups, the primary focus of his economic sociology, and types of authority, 50 capitalist ideology the major concern of his political sociology. [see weber (1925) 1947] 1s the result of this bifurcation of reality is that weber obscures the interrelationships between the agreements of interest groups and the imposition of authorities; as jean cohen (1972, p. 65) and more recently, erik olin wright (1974-75, pp. 94-95) have argued, domination becomes the "authoritarian power of command" as weber locates power not in economic relations of class, but in the political relations of bureaucracy. for weber, the primary characteristic of bureaucratic social organization is the rationalized specialization of tasks, the development of a hierarchy of authority. as anthony giddens (1972) points out, this characteristic is also the most important, the most essential, feature of weber's rational capitalism -an economic system he defines as being "identical with the pursuit of profit, and forever renewed profit, by means of continuous, rational . . . enterprise." [weber (1904-05) 1958, p. 17] weber argues -to follow the giddens thesis -that the labor of administrative officials is like the labor of the workers whom they administer (control), "expropriated" from the means of production by the bureaucratic form of social organization. this separation of administrative staff from the material means of administrative organization allows weber to equate managers with workers; similarly, it also serves to equate bureaucracy with, and to legitimate, the existent division of labor produced by modern capitalism. (see giddens 1972, pp. 34-36) much of weber's work, in addition to his writing on bureaucracy, 51 is concerned with the development of capitalism in germany. his doctoral dissertation of 1889 examined the various legal principles by which medieval trading companies were allowed to combine in order to minimize the risk of private enterprise. subsequently, he studied the junker estates of east prussia and worker-motivation in his grandfather's linen factory in westphalia. his several speeches to the congresses of the verein fur sozialpolitik in 1905, 1907, 1909 and 1911, touched upon such topics as cartels and the state, economic communal enterprises, the growth of bureaucracy, and the problems of productivity and psychology of the working classes. in none of this work does weber ever seem to 18 fundamentally question the sanctity of capitalism. however, he is careful to promote a particular kind of capitalism. accordingly, in his 1909 speech weber decries the addiction to order produced by "the unquestioning idolization of bureaucracy." he argues that this "predilection for bureaucracy" is "a purely moral sentiment." therefore, he urges that this "belief in the unshakability of the undoubtedly high moral standard of german officialdom" be replaced with a more objective system. although this system would be based upon "the expansion of private capital, coupled with a purely business officialdom which is more easily exposed to corruption," it would help germany increase her 'power value', "the ultimate value," among the nations of the world. 19 [weber (1909) in mayer 1955, pp. 125-131] ten years later, amidst the post-war clamor for socio-economic arrangements that 52 capitalist ideology were more socialistic, weber again offers an "objective" defense of an "objective" capitalism: we have truly no reason to love the lords of heavy industry. indeed, it is one of the main tasks of democracy to break their destructive political influence. however, economically their leadership is not only indispensable, but becomes more so than ever now, when our whole economy and all its industrial enterprises will have to be organized anew. the communist manifesto quite correctly emphasized the economically (not the politically) revolutionary character of the work of the bourgeois-capitalist entrepreneur. no trade union, least of all a state-socialist official, can carry out these functions for us. we must simply make use of them, in their right place: hold out to them their necessary premium -profits -without, however, allowing this to go to their heads. only in this way today'. -is the advance of socialism possible. [giddens 1972, pp. 24-25] once again, weber's scientific schizophrenia permits him to posit a fragmented world -a world in which the development of a science that is objective links weber's sociology to a capitalism built upon the objectivity of bureaucracy. the value neutrality that supposedly results, in fact, creates the value bias of his impotent sociology. it is a sociology that can be nothing else but a legitimation of prevailing socio-economic arrangements -the arrangements of a german capitalism that weber himself referred to as "the fate of our time" (see loewith 1970, p. 119). thus, in perceptively criticizing those who mistake state-controlled cartel lization (monopolization) of profit and wage interests for the ideal of a "democratic" or "socialist" future, weber proceeds to characterize a viable alternative moving in the direction of 53 alternate routes this ideal, the organization of consumer interests, as a "pipe dream." [weber (1918) 1968, p. 1454] for weber, then, the development of a workable socialism must wait upon the capitalism of a refined state bureaucracy. in weber's sociology, capitalism becomes equated with, interchangeable with, bureaucracy. through a process of substitution the central problem of the german socio-economic order becomes bureaucracy, rather than capitalism; the problem is no longer economic, the fact that one class profits by the labor of another, but political -that is to say, bureaucratic. people do not dominate (control) one another; instead, hierarchical offices (bureaucratic roles) dominate each other (see cohen 1972; giddens 1972, p. 36). people "alienate" each other not because of the way in which interaction is affected by their relationship to the means of production, but because of their "objective" relationship to bureaucratic hierarchies. thus, weber focuses considerable attention on what he referred to as "the leadership 20 problem" (see wright 1974-7s, pp. 96-97). bureaucratic social change: the routinization of charismatic leadership weber was early aware that it was the political leaders elected by the people, and not the people or masses themselves, who safeguard capitalism, and the economic leaders "necessary premium 21 profits --", against "the dictatorship of the official." i bismarck regime had left germany with a strongly centralized s4 capitalist ideology bureaucracy unable, in weber's view, to provide the independent political leadership to carry out the "tasks of the nation" 22 (giddens 1972, p. 35). thus, in his 1895 inaugural lecture (antrittsrede) as professor of ecoromics at the university of freiburg, he speaks of the necessity for developing the political leadership of the economically prosperous bourgeoisie -leadership which would, without becoming despotic, "place the political power interests of the nation above all other considerations" (see giddens 1972, p. 17). the threatening thing in our situation ... is that the bourgeois classes, as the bearers of the pflkfirinterests of the nation, seem to wilt away, while thete are no signs that the workers are beginning to show the maturity to replace them. the danger does not . . . lie with the masses. it is not a question of the economic position of the ruled , but rather the political qualification of the ruling and ascending classes which is the ultimate issue in tn~e social-political problem. [giddens 1972, pp. 17-18] scientist weber provides citizen weber with a solution to this problem, the leader with charisma. this extraordinary individual, like weber's superhuman sociologist, is able to put his fragmented world back together again, protecting both the wilting bourgeoisie and the immature workers from the political dangers of bureaucracy/ capitalism. that these dangers, in weber's view, have little or nothing to do with class differences, the economic relationship between the rulers and the rulec, logically anticipates his particular kind of "voluntarism." in brief, it is a freedom of action that becomes rationally reserved for the super individual, the charismatic leader, whose personal magnetism "preaches, creates, 55 alternate routes or demands new obligations" [weber (1925) 1947, p. 361] of bureaucracy/capitalism. for weber, charismatic domination is, at least initially, the very opposite of bureaucratic domination. "pure" charisma is antithetical to all ordered economy. "it is the very force that disregards economy . . . where its 'pure' type is at work, it is the very opposite of the institutionally permanent" (gerth and mills 1946, p. 248). however, it is precisely this instability of charismatic authority which according to weber permits it to be fitted into the reality of socio-economic relations: . . . genuine charisma rests upon the legitimation of personal heroism or personal revelation. yet precisely this quality of charisma as an extraordinary, supernatural, divine power transforms it, after its routinization, into a suitable source for the legitimate acquisition of sovereign power by the successors of the charismatic hero. routinized charisma thus continues to work in favor of all those whose power and possession is guaranteed by that sovereign power, and who thus depend upon the continued existence of such power. [gerth and mills 1946, p. 262] charisma, then, becomes routinized to answer the "need of social strata, privileged through existing political, social, and economic orders, to have their social and economic positions 'legitimized'" (see gerth and mills 1946, p. 262). in the final analysis, even weber's super individual, the charismatic leader, must eventually cooperate in tailoring (routinizing) 'irrational" and "revolutionary' passions to fit the bureaucracy (the capitalism) of prevailing socio-economic arrangements. weber writes: "the routinization of charisma, in quite essential respects, is identical with adjustment to the conditions of the economy, that is, to the continuously 56 capitalist ideology effective routines of workaday life. in this, the economy leads and is not led" (see gerth and mills 1946, p. 54). 23 weber's antidote for this deadening effect of bureaucracy/ capitalism, is, as both cohen (1972) and wright (1974-75) point out, individualistic opposition -an opposition which is to be based upon acceptance of the prevailing normative definitions of the existent socio-economic system. even weber's chosen agent of change, the charismatic political leader, has no other alternative but to work from within bureaucracy/capitalism, cooperating with the privileged social strata in cooling charisma. the passions which initiate change are to be carefully monitored (routinized) to fall considerably short of that "carnival we decorate with the proud name of •revolution'." [weber (1919) 1946, p. 115] for weber, the point is not to alter the bureaucracy/capitalism that allows some individuals to dominate at the expense of others; rather, "the point is to salvage the soul against the impersonal, calculating formal rationality of domination" (cohen 1972, p. 82). 24 super leaders, superman sociologists, and weber's ideal type as stereotype the salvation urged by weber's sociology helps ensure the continuation of bureaucratic/capitalistic domination. both weber's "mildmannered daily reporter," the superman sociologist, and his charismatic leader can , like clark kent, "leap tall buildings at a single bound" -providing the appearance of transcending reality, while actually preserving it. weber's faith in the charisma of a 57 alternate routes super agent of change -the logical extension of, and counterpart to, his super scientist -is transformed into a faith in prevailing socio-economic arrangements. thus, while his charismatic leader and sociologist alike are able to momentarily transcend their cultural surroundings -the former at the outset, prior to the routinization of charisma, and the latter nearer the completion of value-relevant, but not value-biased, scientific work -they resign themselves to cultural influences at that point in their work most crucial to the maintenance of the established socio-economic system. in brief, the charismatic leader's' personal magnetism creates a passion that, in falling short of revolution, becomes locked into (routinized by) the prevailing socio-economic system. similarly, the superman sociologist's objectivity creates a science in which his problem-producing reality becomes locked into the "phone booth" 25 of weber's imagination -a science that leaves him incapable of emerging to observe how his sociology is changed by, but unable to change, existent socio-economic arrangements . weber's phone booth is the ideal type. it is this methodological technique that permits the transformation of citizen weber's empirical reality into the "mental constructs" cf scientist weber. he describes the ideal type as a research procedure in both negative and positive terms. it is not ideal in the sense of advocating something which ought to be. neither is it average in either the sense of a mediation or a summary of all traits common to a given phenomenon. it is not a 58 capitalist ideology proposition about reality which can be empirically verified as reality's "true" essence. thus, the ideal type is neither a hypothesis, nor can it be construed as an end in itself. rather, the ideal type is a technique, a means for constructing and testing hypotheses in order to facilitate comparisons of various aspects of the empirical world. according to weber: ... an ideal type is formed by the one-sided accentuation of one or more points of view and by the synthesis of a great many diffuse, discrete, more or less present and occasionally absent concrete individual phenomena, which are arranged according to those one-sidedly emphasized viewpoints into a unified analytical construct (gedankenbild) . in its conceptual purity, this mental construct (gedankenbild) cannot be found empirically anywhere in reality. it is a utopia . . . [weber (1904) 1949, p. 90] however, while the ideal type is never actually found in reality, it must be "objectively possible." [weber (1904) 1949, p. 80] logical soundness, then, is the basis upon which such a type is to be accepted as a reliable tool for use in research designed to check its validity. emphasis on logic to construct abstractions which neither are fully realized in, nor are accurately representative of, the material world is often characteristic of another type, the stereotype. both the ideal type and the stereotype involve exaggerating certain key features, while ignoring certain other features, of a phenomenon for the purpose of organizing observation into categories. it is usually argued by weber's many current disciples that such a comparison is unfair, not legitimate. the ideal type, they contend, 59 alternate routes is a "scientific" tool used to guard against the tendency to stereotype -to type emotionally, using both preconceived beliefs and varied empirical data gathered from biased sources to emphasize negative characteristics. [weber (1904) 1949, especially pp. 90-91] such reasoning is, however, extremely weak protest, as it fails to dismiss the fact that both types can be formulated so as to meet weber's primary criteria of abstractness and logical soundness leading to objective possibility. the result of typing in both instances is often a "picture in the mind -a preconceived (i.e., not based on experience) standardized, group-shared idea" which has been oversimplified (hoult 1974, p. 319). the phenomenon examined is logically cleansed of its contradictions — made into "a pure abstraction of the understanding" (see mueller 1959) . the world becomes a matter of competing interpretations -definitions of the situation -with the appellation "scientific" used to distinguish among various typologies, withholding credibility from some and lending it to others. in sun, in constructing his sociology, weber carefully overlooks the primary fact concerning this competition: namely, that both the ideal type of the scientist and the stereotype of the citizen are, like all other abstractions, given a fixed form in the reality of everyday living by the powerful -usually at the expense of the less powerful. weber's inability to see that it is the powerful 's desire to replace symbols (definitions of the situation) no longer effective in dominating the less powerful which constitutes 60 capitalist ideology the new knowledge necessitating the construction of fresh ideal types, is scientific blindness attributable to the "objectivity" of his sociology. this objectivity, residing in the sociologist's scientific and not citizen self, is supposed to produce a science that is value neutral; instead, it encourages development of a body of knowledge that is subjective and biased -a sociology that permits weber to live in both his worlds without adequately understanding either one. it is a sociology that, like the ideal type which provides its basic insights, confuses appearances with the actualities of the social world it attempts to describe and analyze. thus, bureaucracy appears to be equatable with capitalism, manager with worker, people with offices, power with politics, political leadership with change. such confusion is characteristic of a science most concerned with preserving rather than changing the reality of prevailing socio-economic arrangements; a science that enlists the superhuman qualities of charismatic leaders and scientific sociologists to create a sociology which supports that which is, as opposed to that which might be. conclusion and present-day implications the sociology of max weber, above all else, is a science oriented towards preserving the rapidly maturing german capitalism of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. his justification of existing socio-economic arrangements was accomplished "objectively." for weber, the socio-economic arrangements of german capitalism at the turn of the century were not only "the fate" of his time, but also the facts "the truth is the truth," spoke weber from his deathbed in munich -61 alternate routes his last attempt to support the objective sociology which could alone give credence to these final words. since that june day in 1920 the many and varied implications of weber's objective science have been explored by his disciples and critics alike. there is one major implication which continues to be of primary importance: the "executive privilege" that has welded nationalistic passions to the developing multi-national economic system from bismarck to bethmann to pierre eliott trudeau, richard m. nixon and gerald r. ford, can be more readily extended to bureaucratic sociologists if scientific work is thought to exist in a realm of reason set apart from a sphere of sentiment. for modern social scientists this apparently objective sociology capable of separating values from facts, the political economy from science, has; been most appealing. it becomes even more appealing when combined with weber's bureaucracy-equals-capitalism analysis which gives considerable impetus to a trend he bemoaned -namely, the increasingly narrow range of choices open to most individuals as capitalism matures. such analysis makes it easier for modern sociologists to take a "factual" view of the dominant socio-economic arrangements of their day that is in harmony with weber's description of german capitalism in 1900 as "the fate of our time." in developing this view, they may be able to gain a measure of security for themselves by reproducing the curious paradox which makes it appear that weber's sociology mourns the decline and replacement of the cultivated and well-rounded individual by the technician, while it actually 62 capitalist ideology encourages a role of growing importance for the specialized expert -a professional. in sum, the most potentially dangerous suggestion implied by weber's legacy to present-day social scientists involves the possibility of their continued emphasis upon, and the consequent growth in importance of, objective sociology as the focal point of the professionalism which guides their scientific practice. dangerous, because it is a professionalism that encourages weber's social scientists to see themselves as members of interest groups of a particular kind -interest groups which they view as being somewhat autonomous from other groups in a society supposedly made more pluralistic ("democratic") by their presence. with objective training in a specific discipline, social scientists in the weberian mold claim the capability to stand apart from and control the passions that sway the masses. like weber, their "constellations of interest" give way to both charismatic leaders and superhuman sociologists who transcend the ordinary by pacifying passion in a professional manner. these educated and relatively autonomous professionals know the truth as weber saw it. also, their sociologies continue to develop arguments reiterating the most fundamental paradox characteristic of his science: the objectivity that is supposed to preserve the pluralism of choice among conflicting values, results instead in a value-partisanship -a partisanship that further strengthens the dominating position of a wealthy and privileged elite engaged in fashioning a capitalism that is increasingly one-dimensional. 63 alternate routes notes 1. the riots of unemployed germans and the nearly continual depression suffered by the americans from 1873 to 1898 called into question the central assumptions of laissez faire capitalism. the transition to corporate capitalism questioned the harmony between self-interests and the interests of the larger society, the "natural law" of supply and demand as automatic balance, and the state's role of non-interference with this natural law. as the state moved from its role of referee to that of regulator of economic activity, it repeatedly intervened to extend the limits of the marketplace and further concentrate industrial wealth in the holdings of a relatively few corporate capitalists. this process proceeded somewhat more rapidly in the united states than in germany. even so, the concentration of available german capital in banks, to take an important indicator of corporate development, was occurring at the same time (the last quarter of the nineteenth century), if not a little earlier, in germany than it was in the united states. by 1900 both countries were characterized by comparatively well-developed corporate economies. mann (1968, especially pp. 200-203) provides more details concerning the growth of corporate socio-economic arrangements in germany, and williams (1966) does the same for the united states. 2. the adjective charismatic is used here to indicate the fact that "specifically exceptional qualities," to borrow from weber's own definition of charisma, of bismarck's personality had important effects on the german masses. its use is not meant to suggest, however, that bismarck (or hitler) derived the power with which he ruled by personal magnetism alone. on the contrary, the governmental administration bismarck created is a near-perfect example of social organization designed to routinize charisma by legitimating power within the confines of bureaucratic routine. 3. with reference to the american economy, this link between socio-economic reforms which marked the transformation from laissez faire to corporate capitalism and the origins of a scientific sociology has been traced by smith (1965; 1970). with reference to the socio-economic reform of the german economy in relation to political leadership and the development of a scientific sociology, it should be noted that weber at times spoke against bismarck. [weber (1918) 1968, pp. 138s-1392; gerth and mills 1946, pp. 31-33; bendix 1962, pp. 443-444] however, the fact that weber sometimes denounced eismarck for his intolerance of independent-minded political leaders and his reliance upon advisors who were nothing more than docile and obedient servants of governmental bureaucracy, does not alter and should not overshadow the equally important, if not more important, fact that weber's sociology was a powerful reinforcement for -essentially an imitation of -bismarck's 64 capita n sx. laeoiogy bureaucratic administration. bendix (1962, p. 451) includes a brief note to the effect that weber exempted bismarck from his "wholesale indictment" of monarchical and bureaucratic absolutism. 4. this combination of factors constituting the central focus of weber's sociology was not new among german intellectuals. weber's notion of an "objective" science dates back at least to kant and hegel, as well as being clearly evident in the beliefs and actions of johann fichte. professor fichte of the university of berlin was an outspoken advocate of german nationalism -believing that the superiority of the german people made it imperative that the germans not only govern themselves, but also the french and all the other peoples of europe as well. fichte's nationalism was strongly supported by his conceptions of the nature of science and of the university setting within which it was taught. nearly 100 years before weber wrote about separating reason from emotion, fichte, evidently fearing that the outbreak of war in 1813 might bring emotional bias into his classroom, dramatically cancelled his lectures and retired to his study "until the liberation of the fatherland" (see taylor 1945, pp. 44-45). 5. the general point emphasized here has been well-made by blackburn (1969). he, like myself, emphasizes the interconnections between prevailing socio-economic arrangements and bureaucratic fatalism, charismatic leadership, and social change. the present paper attempts to elaborate these interconnections by offering a more detailed examination of weber's value-neutral methodology, the fundamental scientific base upon which weber's sociology rests. 6. for an excellent elaboration of the way in which bismarck attempted to create economic reality that would be in accord with this statement, see engels (1887-88, especially pp. 89-108). despite bismarck's close identification with the junkers, many biographers suggest that he was not raised as one (see, for example, taylor 1955, especially pp. 13-14). 7. some scholars claim that friederich engels and not marx was primarily responsible for writing the series of new york tribune articles bearing the title germany: revolution and counterrevolution . however, whether one chooses to cite engels as does leonard krieger, and link revolution and counter-revolution with engels' earlier work, the peasant war in germany , in order to demonstrate that they are continuous sections of a single theme, or whether one cites marx as is done here, is of li.ttle matter. • the important point is the marx-engels emphasis on analysis which focuses upon the composition and interactions of the different socio-economic classes before and after the revolution of 1848 in germany (see marx 1851-52, especially pp. 4-11, 13, 30-31, 37, 39, 65 alternate routes 41, 43, 46-47, 51-52, infra.) . it should be noted here that historian taylor (1945, p. 77) makes an attempt to disclaim class as a motivating factor in liberal activities during this period; however, this disclaimer does not alter either the essential correctness of the marx-engels analysis, or the fact that these liberals, as professionals, were a part of the emerging middle classes. 8. military power is mayer's emphasis, objectively is mine. earlier weber had supported the naval program of secretary of state for the imperial navy, admiral von tirpitz. as mann (1968) points out, weber "surrendered as much to the cult of power as the imperial admiral" and most other germans by urging the development of sea power as an essential part of world politics designed to protect the german economy. weber writes: only complete political dishonesty and naive optimism can fail to recognize that, after a period of peaceful competition, the inevitable urge of all nations with bourgeois societies to expand their trade must now once more lead to a situation in which power alone will have a decisive influence on the extent to which individual nations will share in the economic control of the world, and thus determine the economic prospects of their peoples and of their workers in particular, [see mann 1968, p. 262] 9. for another historian's view concerning the conservative and reactionary policy developed by bismarck, see eyck (1948, especially pp. 15-18). 10. this was the paradoxical irony of the bismarck administration: that in order to protect his own power, bismarck was continually forced to support a policy of unification which moved the nation ever closer to the greater germany he did not desire. 11. biilow's "world policy" had been developing for some years under his predecessors. caprivi, especially, was very active in foreign affairs (see mann 1968, pp. 255-256). for more details on the way in which biilow directed germany's international relations see mann (1968, pp. 265-270, especially pp. 266 and 268). 12. evidently, weber had no small measure of success in training many of his closest friends and relatives to exclude such sentiment. thus, writing his wife-to-be, marianne, weber cautions: "we must not tolerate within us vague and mystical attitudes. if feelings run high, you must tame them, to steer your life soberly" (mayer 1955, p. 37). later, marianne, in a biography of her 66 vop i (.a i i o fa i ucu i uyj husband, would wtite in the third person (speaking of herself as "she" and of her husband and herself as "they") ; in short, "the indestructible barriers against yielding to passions" (even such "passion" as writing in the first person when speaking about oneself), which marianne notes that weber's mother had developed in him, are also readily observable in marianne herself (see green 1974, pp. 119-120). 13. it should be made clear at the outset of this discussion and analysis that i appreciate the breadth, and realize the several lasting contributions of weber's work. accordingly, only a small portion of his work has been scrutinized, focusing in particular on weber's conceptions of objectivity and bureaucracy, in order to show the way in which his writings on scientific method and social organization have made a lasting impact upon present-day sociology. further, the criticism of weber's notion of "objectivity" presented herein is not meant to undermine or destroy the idea that science as logical method can be of value in comparing several arguments, one to another, in order to attempt a determination of the validity of each. the judgment implied in this determination is recognition of the reality that some arguments make a stronger case then others. the stronger arguments constitute better interpretations of the material world because, to borrow a phrase from c. wright mills, they are closer to "the run of fact." this fact is interpreted by human beings who, rather than possessing as individuals two independent selves, are whole persons whose beings are shaped by a value configuration that results from the intersection of historical influences, the milieu of present social structure, and individual biography. it is within this framework that some arguments and analyses can be considered to be more "objective" than others. for elaboration of this conception of objectivity, the relationship between fact and value, see mills (1961, pp. 76-79, 129-131, and 178). 14. this is not to argue that weber was not acting in "good faith" by emphasizing this separation; he was well aware of the abuse of power and privilege that results when prejudice predominates fact as the major determinant of policy decisions. it is to argue that in moving between his separate worlds weber developed a science, the logic of which could do little other than to offer support for prevailing socio-economic arrangements. it is to argue against the view that the development of sociology by weber which supported and/or paralleled capitalist interests is in the main attributable to accident. 15. the attempt by bendix (1962, p. 289) to apologize for weber's inability to adequately relate his analytical abstractions to the material world cannot make weber's fragmented conception of reality whole. 67 alternate routes 16. for further elaboration see weber (1904-05, p. 19 and chapter ii, "the spirit of capitalism," especially pp. 62-69). also, see gerth and mills (1946, "social structures and types of capitalism," pp. 6s-69); and weber (1925, "the principal modes of capitalistic orientation of profit making, " pp. 278-280). 17. a fuller appreciation of the way in which weber's understanding of the close relationship between bureaucracy and capitalism helped to unite them in his sociology may be gained from further examination of his own writings. [see weber (1918) 1968, pp. 1381-1469, especially pp. 1393-1395] 18. weber [(1918) 1968, pp. 1423-1424] gives further and later evidence of his consistency in protecting capitalistic socioeconomic arrangements. for a complete list of weber's several speeches to the verein fur sozialpolitik see mayer (1955, p. 67). 19. see green (1974) for an excellent study showing the ways in which this split between the moral sentiment of ethics and the objectivity of science affected weber's most intimate relationships. when it comes to drawing out the connections between weber's science and his daily round of activities, the green analysis is superior to any i have read. 20. this focus upon leadership has been carried from weber's work into the present-day by those modern sociologists who develop a pluralistic view of the structure of authority. among the pluralists listed by gillam (1971, pp. 191-198), the "veto group" theory of riesman (1950) and the "dispersed inequalities" thesis of dahl (1961) are two of the most well-known arguments traceable to weber's concern with leadership. in contrast, the legacy left by marx with his "ruling class" model of the structure of power is exemplified today in the "power elite"thesis of mills (1956) and the "governing class" argument of domhoff (1967; 1970) . 21. both giddens (1972, pp. 17-19) and mayer (1955, pp. 44, 94-96) provide short, but excellent, reviews of weber's thinking on the relationship between bureaucracy and democracy. for a more lengthy treatment of similar high quality which compares weber's analysis of this relationship to that of v.i. lenin, see wright (1974-75). 22. weber's emphasis upon leadership has been accurately summarized as follows: "it was weber as much as anyone who made imperialism a respectable political cause in germany" (green 1974, p. 155, also see pp. 149-150, 153). 23. weber thought that "of all those powers that lessen the importance of individual action, the most irresistible is rational discipline" (see gerth and mills 1946, p. 253). for weber, it is 68 capitalist ideology clear that even the charismatic leader must, at some point, submit to the dictates of rationality. thus, weber was able to create and practice a science that could routinize the charisma of a bismarck, supporting he and his successors by separating doctrine from the person who advocates it. he attempted to do this in his own life even when the person involved, otto gross, was openly loved by weber's lover, else von richthofen, and lived a style of life disapproved of by weber (see green 1974, especially pp. 56, 129). 24. the term "superman" should be thought of in a generic sense, for its use is not intended to exclude women. superhuman activities are not limited to the male sex alone, as comic book readers and television viewers who follow the super feats of "wonder woman" are well aware. 25. for those readers who are unfamiliar with superman comics, radio and television programs, public phone booths, as well as restrooms were locations often used by clark kent for his transformation from "mild-mannered daily reporter" into superman. 26. it should be pointed out that the material quoted here is only part of a more complete definition which seems to support weber's notion of the ideal type. 69 alternate routes references bendix, reinhard. 1962. max weber: an intellectual portrait . garden city: doubleday. blackburn, robin. 1969. "a brief guide to bourgeois ideology." pp. 37-46 in student power , edited by alexander cockburn and robin blackburn. baltimore: penguin books. cohen, jean. 1972. "max weber and the dynamics of rationalized domination." telos (winter) : 63-86. dahl, robert a. 1961. who governs? democracy and power in an american city . new haven: yale university press. dcmhoff, g. william. 1967. who rules america?. englewood cliffs: prentice-hall. . 1970. the higher circles . new york: random house. engels, friedrich. (1850, 1851-52) 1967. the german revolutions ( the peasant war in germany and germany: revolution and counter-revolut ion) . leonard krieger, ed. chicago: the university of chicago press. (1887-88) 1972. the role of force in history: a study of bismark's policy of blood and iron , translated by jack cohen and edited by ernst kangermann. new york: international publishers. eyck, erich. 1948. bismarck after fifty years . london: george philip 5 son. gerth, hans h., and c. wright mills. 1946. from max weber: essays in sociology . new york: oxford. giddens, anthony. 1972. politics and sociology in the thought of max weber . toronto: macmillan. gillam, richard, ed. 1971. power in postwar america . boston: little, brown and company. green, martin. 1974. the von richthofen sisters: the triumphant and the tragic modes of love . new york: basic books. 70 capitalist ideology hoult, thomas ford. 1974. dictionary of modern sociology . totowa, new jersey: littlefield, adams $ company. loewith, karl. 1970. "weber's interpretation of the bourgeoiscapitalistic world in terms of the guiding principle of •rationalization*." pp. 101-122 in max weber , edited by dennis wrong. englewood cliffs: prentice-hall. mann, golo. 1968. the history of germany since 1789 . new york: frederick a. praeger. marx, karl. (1851-52) 1952. revolution and counter-revolution or germany in 1848 . eleanor marx ave ling, ed. london: george allen and unwin ltd. mayer, j. p. 1955. max weber and german politics . london: faber and faber. mills, c. wright. 1956. the power elite . new york: oxford. . 1961. the sociological imagination . new york: oxford. mitzman, arthur. 1970. the iron cage: an historical interpretation of max weber . new york: grosset 6 dunlap, inc. mueller, gustav emil, tr. 1959. g.w. f.hegel in encyclopedia of philosophy . new york: philosophical library. rheinstein, max, ed. (edward shils and m. rheinstein, trans.). 1954. max weber on law in economy and society . cambridge: harvard university press. riesman, david. 1950. the lonely crowd . new haven: yale university press. roth, guenther. 1963. the social democrats in imperial germany: a study in working-class isolation and national integration . totowa, new jersey: bedminster press. shuster, george n., and arnold bergstraesser. 1944. germany: a short history . new york: w.w. norton. smith, dusky lee. 1965. "sociology and the rise of corporate capitalism." science and society 29: 401-418. . 1970. some socio-economic influences upon the founding fathers o f sociology in the united states (unpublished ph.d. dissertation) . buffalo: state university of new york. 71 alternate routes taylor, a. j. p. 1945. the course of german history: a survey of the development of germany since 1815 . london: hamish hamilton. . 1955. bismarck: the man and the statesman . new york: alfred a. knopf. weber, max. (1904) 1949. '** objectivity' in social science and social policy." pp. 49-112 in the methodology of the social sciences , translated and edited by edward a. shils and henry a. finch. new york: the free press. . (1904-05) 1958. the protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism , translated by talcott parsons. new york: charles scribner's sons. . (1909) 1955. "max weber on bureaucratization in 1909." pp. 125-131 in max weber and german politics , j. p. mayer. london: faber and faber. . (1918) 1968. "parliament and government in a reconstructed germany." pp. 1381-1469 in economy and society , edited by guenther ross and claus wittich. new york: bedminster. (1919) 1946. "politics as a vocation." pp. 77-128 in from max weber , translated, edited and introduced by gerth and mills. new york: oxford. . (1925) 1947. the theory of social and economic organization , talcott parsons, ed.(a.m. henderson and t. parsons, trans.). new york: oxford. williams, william a. 1966. the contours of american history . chicago: quadrangle books. wright, erik olin. 1974-75. "to control or to smash bureaucracy: weber and lenin on politics, the state, and bureaucracy." berkeley journal of sociology 19: 69-108. 72 the myth of canadian exceptionalism | 19 the myth of canadian exceptionalism: crisis, non-recovery, and austerity —jim stanford1 since the onset of the global financial crisis and resulting worldwide recession in 2008, canadian political leaders have consistently boasted (to both domestic and international audiences) about canada’s supposedly superior record in avoiding the worst effects of that crisis, and then quickly repairing the damage and getting back to previous trajectories of growth and prosperity.2 indeed, at first federal leaders (led by finance minister jim flaherty) even denied that canada would be caught in the global conflagration at all – illustrated most strikingly by mr. flaherty’s ill-fated fiscal update of october 2008, which denied the existence of a recession which in fact had already hit the country (department of finance, 2008).3 once it became obvious that this could not be true, the government changed tack, and – in cooperation with other countries, as agreed at the g20’s emergency summit meeting in washington in november 2008 – launched a powerful but temporary series of emergency fiscal, monetary, and financial measures. the recession that then hit canada was quick and sharp, but shortlived (by technical economic definitions, anyway): real gross domestic product (gdp) bottomed out in july 2009 and began to grow again. by the autumn of 2010 real gdp had regained its pre-recession peak (reached two years earlier). a few months later (by january 2011), total employment also regained its pre-recession peak, and the government crowed that the damage from the recession had thus been fully repaired. political 1 jim stanford is an economist with the canadian auto workers. he can be reached at stanford@caw.ca. the author acknowledges very helpful comments on an earlier draft from stephen mcbride. 2 this work extends and updates previous research by the author. see stanford, 2012; 2012b. 3 the glaring sense of denial which infused that document sparked the subsequent political crisis during which the opposition parties united to vote non-confidence in the minority conservative government, followed by the prorogation of parliament by the governorgeneral. 20 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism figures naturally credited their own economic management for this purported recovery – including, variously, tax cuts (implemented before and during the recession), canada’s relatively lower public debt, the emergency fiscal and financial measures taken during the crisis, and canada’s more stringent banking regulations. economic conditions may be suboptimal, it was acknowledged, but canadians should be grateful that the country survived the crisis so much better than the rest of the world. this argument was a potent weapon in the conservatives’ successful campaign to win a majority mandate in the election of spring 2011. the traditional “rule of thumb” of economists in canada is that a recession occurs when real gdp declines for two consecutive quarters, and a “recovery” commences when real gdp begins to expand again. by this definition, the recession lasted for three quarters beginning in the autumn of 2008, and recovery began in the summer of 2009. real gdp has continued to edge ahead (albeit unspectacularly and unsteadily), employment has increased (also fitfully), and the economy seems headed in a forward direction. so has the canadian economy indeed been “exceptional” in how the crisis was experienced and managed here? it turns out that both components of the government’s dual boast – that canada fared much better than other countries, and that the damage from the recession has already been repaired – are false. and both claims founder on the same underlying empirical fact: canada’s population grows over time, and relatively quickly. trends in absolute levels of output and employment need to be considered in the context of that population growth. on average over the last five years, canada’s total population has increased by about 1.2 percent per year. the working age population (aged 15 years and over, by canadian statistical definitions) has been growing slightly faster than that: about 1.3 percent per year. with a growing population, therefore, the economy must continuously generate new employment opportunities, and new output and income, simply to support a constant standard of living and a steady degree of labour market utilization. comparisons of the total number of jobs, or the total volume of output, over time require adjustments for this ongoing expansion in the canadian population. in fact, canada’s population growth is among the fastest in the industrialized world. canada’s population growth rate is faster than any other g7 economy (including the u.s.), faster than mexico’s, and nearly twice the organization for economic cooperation and development (oecd) average. strong population growth generates a certain underlying economic momentum (since growing population naturally stimulates underlying growth in consumer spending and other variables). but it also sets the myth of canadian exceptionalism | 21 a higher “bar” in order to maintain a steady-state economic standard: the canadian economy must generate hundreds of thousands of new jobs each year, and tens of billions of dollars in new gdp, just to maintain existing economic and labour market conditions. when canadian officials boast that the pace of job-creation or gdp growth is relatively high compared to other countries, they neglect to mention that canada’s economy must generate more growth and jobs, just to stand still. other industrialized countries (like japan or germany), where population is stagnant or even declining, do not need to generate such significant annual expansion in order to protect existing benchmarks. similarly, when political leaders claim that the absolute level of employment or production has regained and surpassed pre-recession peaks, they neglect to consider the impact of ongoing population growth in the several years since those pre-recession peaks were reached. any comparisons of economic and employment performance, therefore, whether over time or across countries, must take account of the impact of population growth on measures of utilization or prosperity. once those adjustments are made, then the tone of self-congratulation which typifies so many official pronouncements on canada’s recent economic performance is shown to be thoroughly unjustified. this paper will consider in turn the twin claims made by canadian political leaders: namely, that the damage done by the recession to the canadian economy and labour market has now been repaired, and that canada did much better than other industrialized countries in traversing the difficult economic conditions of the last few years. section i indicates that after adjusting for population growth, the recovery in neither gdp nor employment since the recession has yet to recoup the ground lost during the 2008-09 downturn. in the labour market, in particular, the pace of employment-creation has lagged far behind the pace of population growth. after adjusting for population growth, just one-fifth of the damage done by the recession had been repaired by mid-2012 – fully three years after the official onset of the recovery. moreover, this key labour market indicator has not improved since the spring of 2010, highlighting the stalling of the canadian recovery since that time. as discussed in section ii, canada’s international economic reputation similarly loses considerable lustre when the data are adjusted for canada’s faster-than-average population growth. in per capita terms, the change in canada’s real gdp since 2007 ranks an uninspiring 16th among the 34 countries of the oecd. similarly, after adjusting for growth in the working age population, canada’s employment performance has been equally middling: once again ranking 17th (out of 33 22 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism reporting countries) in terms of the change in the employment rate since 2007. if there is one word to summarize canada’s economic standing among its industrialized peers, it should be “mediocre.” section iii provides further comment on another factor that has been suggested as contributing to canada’s economic performance during and after the global financial crisis: the relative stability of the canadian banking system. while canadian financial markets experienced significant stress during the worst moments of the global crisis, no canadian banks failed, and credit conditions did not experience the same degree of contraction as in u.s. and european markets. this relative stability certainly constituted a canadian “advantage” in recent years. the reasons for this stability are considered, with special emphasis on the role of powerful stabilizing state interventions – both long-standing policies and regulations, and emergency measures implemented during the crisis. the exceptionalist claim that canadian banks were somehow inherently immune from the global meltdown is refuted; the success of the canadian financial system in traversing the global meltdown reflects state policy, not any embedded advantages of canadian banks. part i: historical comparisons canada’s economy (measured by real output) began to shrink in the third quarter of 2008, and declined close to 4 percent by summer 2009, when the official recession ended and real gdp began to recover. in per capita terms, however, the downturn began somewhat earlier: at the beginning of 2008, when slowing economic expansion began to lag behind ongoing population growth. real per capita gdp then fell by over 5 percent by summer 2009. the decline in the per capita measure was worse than the fall in total gdp, because of the impact of ongoing population growth that continued even as the economy was in recession. as indicated in figure 1, real per capita gdp has improved fairly steadily but slowly since mid-2009, with the exception of the second quarter of 2011 when total gdp (and, of course, per capita gdp) declined. however, those 9 quarters (over two years) of economic progress have repaired only about 70 percent of the reduction in real per capita gdp that occurred during the downturn. real per capita gdp remains 1.4 percent lower as of the third quarter of 2011, than it was at the beginning of 2008. in fact, real per capita gdp is still lower in canada than it was at the beginning of 2006 (when the harper conservative government first took power); during almost six years of conservative “stewardship,” therefore, canadians have experienced no economic progress (by this measure) whatsoever. the myth of canadian exceptionalism | 23 put differently, real gdp declined by some $2,100 per canadian (measured in 2002 dollar terms) during the 9 months of the official recession. the subsequent 27 months of recovery recouped some $1,500 of that loss, leaving gdp per person $600 lower than before the recession. of course, trends in average real gdp per capita are not an adequate portrayal of actual living standards of the majority of canadians anyway, for several well-known reasons. average gdp per capita takes no account of the distribution of income, so at a time of growing income polarization, the average measure is an increasingly misleading indicator of the actual material standards experienced by the growing share of marginalized canadians. and many components of gdp (including corporate profits, depreciation, and others) are never fully reflected in individual incomes or living standards. for this reason, the decline in average real per capita personal incomes has been slightly worse than the decline in real per capita gdp. in fact, the lasting damage from the recession is considerably worse than that. it is normal for an economy to demonstrate rising real per capita output over time, as a result of technological improvements and productivity growth. the pre-recession trend in canada was for real per capita gdp to increase by around 1.5 percent per year (reflecting capital accumulation, productivity growth, and innovation). trend potential output has continued to grow during the years of recession and subsequent slow recovery (as indicated in figure 1). relative to that potential,4 current real per capita gdp (of about $39,400 per person, in 2002 dollar terms) is at least 6 percent (or $3,000) below the level it would have reached if the prerecession trend had been sustained. in this regard, the fact that canada’s economy continues to operate well below its productive potential costs each canadian thousands of dollars in foregone income each year. and the modest rebound in real per capita gdp experienced since summer 2009 has not been strong enough to begin to close that gap with potential output that was opened up during the recession. this is different from most previous recoveries, which featured periods of above-trend growth which allowed the economy to catch up to potential output.5 4 the canadian economy was not fully-employed even before the crisis and recession hit in 2008, so even that pre-recession trend does not capture the true full-employment potential of the economy. 5 for example, as canada exited the painful recession of 1981-82, real gdp began to grow at an annual average rate of 5.6 percent during the first three years after the trough of the recession –more than twice as fast as the average gdp growth experienced in the first three years of the present recovery (author’s calculations from statistics canada cansim table 380-0002). the recovery after the 1990s recession, however, was also initially halting and uncertain; only by the last five years of that decade was the economy growing at a fast enough clip (almost 5 percent on an average annual basis) to absorb excess capacity still being carried from the 1990-91 recession. 24 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism adjusting employment statistics for population growth results in an even starker comparison to pre-recession benchmarks. because the potential labour force (represented by the working age population) grows by some 1.3 percent (or around 350,000 canadians) each year, it is not enough for the canadian economy to simply create new jobs. it must produce enough new jobs to keep up with ongoing population growth; in fact, during a recovery job creation must be even faster, in order to repair the damage done by the recession (as well as offsetting ongoing population growth). the best statistic for comparing the pace of job creation with ongoing population growth is the employment rate, which is the ratio of total employment to the working age population. especially during periods of sustained labour market slackness, the employment rate is a more appropriate indicator of labour market well-being than the unemployment rate; in particular, it is unaffected by factors such as the decline in formal labour force participation which results when discouraged workers simply give up looking for work.6 falling labour force participation reduces the unemployment rate, making it seem like the labour market is strengthening, when in fact discouraged workers are simply throwing in the towel. in this context, the employment rate provides a more accurate reading on labour market conditions than the unemployment rate. like real per capita gdp, canada’s employment rate peaked some months before the official onset of recession. the employment rate peaked at 63.8 percent of the working age population in february 2008, after which point the decelerating pace of job creation no longer kept up with ongoing population growth. during the next 17 frightening months, the employment rate plunged by 2.5 percentage points, reaching a trough of 61.3 percent of the working age population in july 2009. that represented the fastest decline in the employment rate of any recession since the 1930s. the subsequent bottoming and recovery of real output in canada has hardly recouped any of this sharp downturn. from july 2009 through mid-2010, the employment rate recovered by about one-half of a percentage point, representing one-fifth of the damage that was done to canadian labour markets by the recession. after summer 2010, however, further labour market progress ground to a halt, as governments shifted from stimulus to austerity and private business investment stagnated. 6 as will be discussed, even the employment rate does not capture the deterioration in the quality of work (represented by trends such as increased part-time, contract, and precarious work) that is another feature of a chronically depressed labour market. the myth of canadian exceptionalism | 25 during the two years from mid-2010 through mid-2012, the employment rate stagnated at an average of 61.8 percent. the employment rate remains 2 full percentage points below the pre-recession peak. regaining that pre-recession peak would require the creation of an incremental 570,000 jobs, doubling the number of actual net jobs created in canada between fall 2008 and mid-2012. this analysis is rooted solely in the quantity of employment in canada’s labour market, not its quality. but since 2008 there has also been a significant deterioration in the quality of employment in canada, measured by the incidence of part-time, temporary, and lowwage work. from october 2008 (the pre-recession peak in canadian employment) through summer 2012, over one third of net new jobs created in canada were part-time. the share of part-time employment has declined slightly since the recovery formally began in july 2009, but is nevertheless considerably higher than before the recession began. similarly, there has been a net reallocation of employment toward lower-wage industries since the recession began. employment in those sectors of the economy (defined at the two-digit level) which pay higher-than-average wages was still lower in mid-2012 than in october 2008 (mostly due to the net loss of over 200,000 jobs during this time in manufacturing). that means that new jobs in lower-wage sectors account for more than 100 percent of all net new jobs created since the pre-recession peak. this has reinforced the continuing longer-run decline in the average quality of jobs in the canadian labour market. this decline in employment quality means that the quantitative data on the employment rate described above (properly adjusted for population growth) understates the true extent of weakness in the canadian labour market. whether measured by output or employment, therefore, it is clear that canada is still grappling with the after-effects of the 2008-09 downturn. in an interesting public opinion poll conducted in late 2011 by the pollara (2011) firm for the economic club of canada, a full 70 percent of canadians believed the country was still in an economic recession – even though, according to economists, the recession had officially ended two-and-a-half years earlier. from the perspective of a labour market that was hammered by the recession, and has barely recouped any of that damage since, it is quite understandable why average canadians could be forgiven for concluding that the recession is still with us. in terms of the employment rate, it clearly still is. 26 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism part ii: international comparisons failing to take account of population growth also distorts international comparisons of economic and employment performance, just as it distorts comparisons over time. for example, canada experienced the 9th fastest rate of gdp expansion in the oecd, on average, since 2007. however, canada has a higher-than-average rate of population growth, and hence must generate faster gdp growth simply to “stand still” in terms of per capita standards. if we adjust for differential population growth rates, then canada’s gdp performance is only mediocre within the sample of industrialized countries. table 1 reports the cumulative evolution of real per capita gdp across the oecd from 2007 through 2011. of the 34 countries in the oecd, canada ranks only 16th – almost exactly in the middle. real per capita gdp for 2011 was still 1.4 percent lower than in 2007. twelve oecd countries have regained and surpassed their pre-recession levels of real per capita gdp (including germany, korea, australia, and several others). these countries might more honestly be able to claim to have repaired the economic damage from their recessions.7 canada, in contrast, can make no such claim. other countries (including sweden, the netherlands, belgium, and new zealand) have yet to regain their pre-recession real per capita gdp benchmarks, but have experienced smaller declines in that measure than canada has. of the countries which have experienced a worse decline in real per capita gdp since 2007 than canada, several experienced full-blown financial crises, complete with bank failures and large losses of apparent wealth. this group includes ireland, greece, and iceland (the worst-hit countries), along with the u.k. and the u.s. the fact that canada’s more strongly regulated banking system avoided these worst-case manifestations of the global crisis clearly contributed to canada’s avoidance of those very large declines in living standards (and the reasons for this outcome are discussed below). however, among the sub-set of countries which did not experience bank failures and associated consequences, canada’s gdp performance has been relatively poor. of course, there are many factors affecting each country’s performance during and after the crisis (in addition to the stability of their respective financial institutions). canada’s international standing is similarly mediocre in terms of our labour market recovery. canada’s economy must generate some7 as noted in section i, however, simply regaining a pre-recession peak in per capita gdp does not take into account the problem that real output, in the intervening years, has continued to lag far behind potential output. the myth of canadian exceptionalism | 27 thing like 225,000 new jobs per year just to keep pace with the ongoing expansion of the working age population.8 it is not sufficient, then, for politicians to point out that the total number of jobs now exceeds the prerecession peak. in the nearly four years since that time, the working age population has grown by 1.3 million. a much faster pace of job creation would have been needed in order to create opportunity for new labour force entrants, as well as re-employ those who were displaced by the downturn. many other industrialized countries, in contrast, do not face that same challenge. population in some oecd countries (like japan, germany, much of eastern europe, and several others) is stagnant or growing very slowly. in that context, total employment might not grow much at all – yet a given employment rate could still be sustained. table 2 reports the change in each oecd country’s employment rate from 2007 (the last full year before the recession) to 2011.9 canada’s average employment rate for 2011 was 0.8 points below its average level for 2007.10 that ranks canada 17th out of the 33 reporting oecd countries included in table 2. eleven countries (including germany, korea, and australia) achieved a higher employment rate by 2011 than was experienced before the recession. these countries, then, can more genuinely claim to have fully repaired the labour market damage of the recession. in france and japan, the employment rate is still lower than in 2007, but the decline was not as steep as in canada. as with table 1, the hardest-hit countries in terms of the decline in the employment rate include those (such as greece, ireland, iceland, and the u.s.) where banks collapsed and vast amounts of credit were destroyed. among a peer group of oecd economies which did not experience such extreme financial shocks, however, canada’s employment performance (like the evolution of gdp) has been relatively poor. part iii: understanding canadian financial stability an influential stream within the broader ideology of canadian exceptionalism is the myth that canadian banks were blameless in the events of the 2008-09 financial crisis and the resulting recession. canadian banks are strong and safe, the argument goes; they were prudent, 8 this estimate represents the product of the annual absolute growth in the working age population times the pre-recession employment rate. 9 chile does not report this data and hence is excluded from table 2. 10 table 2 reports the decline in canada’s employment rate between 2007 and 2011 as 0.8 percentage points, compared to the full 2-point decline in that rate illustrated above in figure 2. the reason for the difference is because table 2 reports the difference in full-year averages (in order to facilitate international comparisons), whereas figure 2 illustrates the more dramatic evolution in the monthly series. 28 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism and above all they (unlike u.s. banks) were not bailed out.11 this argument is invoked in order to deflect critical attention away from canadian financial players, even as other countries (like the u.k. and u.s.) debate how to strengthen financial regulation, and indeed challenge the general political and cultural legitimacy of financial elites. in actuality, canadian banks were bailed out – and powerfully so. at the end of 2008, and the beginning of 2009, federal finance minister flaherty and other federal officials implemented a new program called the extraordinary financing framework (eff). this package of measures consisted of several different ways to assist canadian banks, enhancing their liquidity and shifting risks off their balance sheets, during their hour of need. the major components of the eff included: • using the public mortgage insurance company (canadian mortgage and housing corporation) to buy securitized mortgages from the banks in order to inject cash into the banks’ coffers. • providing large loans, at near-zero interest rates, from the bank of canada, when commercial lenders would not do so. • providing other lines of credit from the bank of canada and other agencies, including in u.s. dollars. • even the u.s. federal reserve bank supported the canadian banks with major assistance offered through its emergency liquidity program. these loans and other liquidity injections were backed up with very unusual forms of collateral – or sometimes with no collateral at all. for example, the bank of canada was willing to accept asset-backed commercial paper (abcp) from the banks to back up some of these emergency loans. this was just a year after the entire abcp market froze up in canada, even before the global meltdown, as a result of growing investor concern regarding the true nature and value of some of the securitized assets contained in abcp products. individual abcp owners were left 11 federal government officials boasted about the relative stability of canadian banks right through the crisis – even as they were channeling unprecedented sums of emergency assistance to those institutions. for example, the government claimed in 2009 that “canada’s financial system has shown exceptional stability throughout the crisis and has become a globally noted leader in best banking practices.” (government of canada, 2009, p.165). the president of the canadian bankers’ association (cba) stated baldly that “not one bank in canada …required a cent in taxpayer-funded bailouts” (anthony, 2010, p.11). some of the debate hinges on a matter of semantics: when is a bail-out not a bail-out? as another cba spokesperson put it, bank critics “seem to be implying that liquidity support is the same as a bank bailout and this is not the case” (tencer, 2012). whether it is called a “bailout” or “liquidity support,” it is a matter of record that over $100 billion of public funds were injected into the private banks in their moment of need. the myth of canadian exceptionalism | 29 holding illiquid paper. but banks with abcp were able to convert it into liquid cash, courtesy of the bank of canada, when they needed it. in total, various federal agencies offered the banks a maximum of up to $200 billion in cash and short term low-interest loans, at a point in time when the banks could not attain this financing from normal commercial sources because of the global crisis. at peak, it is estimated that canadian banks tapped $114 billion of this potential line of credit (macdonald, 2012). incredibly, canadian banks remained profitable right through the dramatic events of 2008 and 2009. every one of the five largest banks declared an annual profit, and only one of them (the cibc) declared even a quarterly loss during the darkest days of the crisis. as credit and economic conditions stabilized, profits strengthened further, and the banks were able to quickly repay the government assistance, with interest in some cases. nevertheless, there is no denying that canadian banks received unprecedented financial support from government in order to survive the crisis, and that without that support there is considerable likelihood that one or more major canadian banks would have failed.12 in this regard, canadian banks were clearly “saved” (or “bailed out”) by powerful public intervention. moreover, quite distinct from the emergency support offered up during the moment of crisis in 2008-09, the canadian financial system has benefited in a longer-term sense from a public policy regime which is accommodating, supportive, and protective. these long-standing protections and subsidies have served to create a domestic financial industry that is more stable and profitable than those in other countries. it was this policy context (not the good judgment or “prudence” of canadian bank executives) which explains why canada’s financial system withstood the storms of 2008-09 more safely than banks in the u.s., the u.k., or europe did.13 deposits up to $100,000 per person per bank are fully guaranteed by the canadian deposit insurance corporation. this eliminates the incentive for a “run” on the bank, and stabilizes the whole system. most home mortgages are insured by the canadian mortgage and housing corporation. this eliminates most of the risk for banks in 12 macdonald’s (2012) study notes that at various times the estimated extent of public lending to three of the big five canadian banks exceeded the market value of the banks; without government support, then, those banks would have been fully “under water.” 13 a very useful summary of the history and nature of canadian bank regulation, and the continuing risks associated with leveraged private banking even in that more stable context, is provided by russell, 2012. 30 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism writing new mortgages, and also makes it easier for them to “collateralize” their mortgages (packaging them into bonds which are sold to financial investors).14 by attaching conditions to the mortgages it ensures (such as requiring minimum down payment ratios or maximum amortization timetables), the cmhc contributes to higher quality in mortgage loans, further reducing risk. the federal government prohibits foreign takeovers of canadian banks. this prevented any major bank from being swallowed up in the mid-2000s when u.s. banks (riding high on the bubble) were scouring the world for acquisitions. earlier in the 200s, the previous liberal federal government also vetoed mergers between the major canadian banks, which also likely contributed to their relatively lower leverage ratios as they headed into the crisis. canadian bank services are heavily subsidized by the canadian tax system, including through the partial taxation of capital gains and dividends, the deductibility of carrying charges, and a plethora of tax shelters for financial investments (such as registered retirement savings plans, registered education savings plans, tax-free savings accounts, and now pooled registered pension plans. both during the global financial crisis, and in a longer-term perspective, the canadian financial industry benefits from a multidimensional framework of government support, subsidy, and stabilization. it is certainly true that the relative stability of canadian banks has been a positive feature of canada’s economic experience since 2008. but that relative stability can be ascribed neither to the judgment or acumen of canadian bankers (who were heavily engaged in leveraged, speculative activities like their counterparts around the world), nor to the specific policy actions of the current canadian government (which inherited the structure of canadian bank regulation from much-earlier predecessors). conclusion since the onset of the global financial crisis and subsequent recession, canadian political leaders have stressed that while things may be difficult for canadians, they are getting better, and the ground lost in the recession has been quickly recovered. moreover, canada is said to have escaped the worst effects of the recession, which hit home 14 this practice also meant that the incremental risk shifted to government by the purchase of mortgages from the banks during the crisis was modest, since those mortgages were already insured by the public agency. the myth of canadian exceptionalism | 31 more painfully in other industrialized countries. many canadians accepted this argument (perhaps due more to the power of sheer repetition, rather than empirical validity), and this contributed to the conservative party’s successful campaign for a majority mandate in may 2011. this mantra of canadian exceptionalism is refuted by an analysis of appropriate measures of economic performance. the damage of the recession is still very much with canadians – and is especially visible in the labour market. real per capita gdp is still below its pre-recession peak, and several thousand dollars per person below its potential level (given pre-recession trends). and the labour market is still much weaker (measured by the employment rate) than before the recession. indeed, measured by the employment rate, only one-fifth of the damage has been repaired, and no further progress has been made on this measure in the last two years. internationally, canada’s performance according to both standards is at best mediocre. certainly, canada has done better than those countries which experienced major banking and financial crises during the 2008-09 downturn (such as the u.s., the u.k., ireland, iceland, greece, and italy). but among the broader set of industrialized countries, canadian performance in terms of output and employment ranks exactly at the mid-point of the sample. instead of allowing politicians to claim credit for doing better than america or italy, they should be challenged to explain why canada’s performance during this time has lagged so far behind many other industrial countries (including germany, korea, australia, and others). in short, the self-congratulatory and triumphalist tone of so many official economic pronouncements in canada is clearly unjustified. in terms of its implications for economic and fiscal policy, the incomplete and relatively weak state of canada’s economic recovery should give considerable pause to policy-makers before embarking on a campaign of fiscal austerity – a campaign which will clearly further undermine output and employment which are still weak. instead, top priority needs to be placed on expansionary measures to strengthen a recovery that has been slow, incomplete, and unsteady. 32 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism references anthony, n.h. (2010, june 30). the facts on banks. winnipeg free press, p.11. department of finance canada. (2008, november 21). protecting canada’s future: economic and fiscal statement. ottawa: department of finance. government of canada. (2009). canada’s economic action plan: a fourth report to canadians. ottawa: government of canada. macdonald, d. (2012). the big banks’ big secret: estimating government support for canadian banks during the financial crisis. ottawa: canadian centre for policy alternatives. pollara. (2011). the economic club of canada. http://www.pollara.com/ eclub2012/report.pdf russell, e. (2012). no more swimming naked: the need for modesty in canadian banking. ottawa: canadian centre for policy alternatives. stanford, j. (2012). canada’s incomplete, mediocre recovery. ottawa: canadian centre for policy alternatives. ——— (2012). a budget for the rest of us: alternative federal budget 2012. ottawa: canadian centre for policy alternatives. tencer, d. (2012, april 30). canada bank bailout cost $114 billion at peak. huffington post. http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2012/04/30/canadabank-bailout-costccpa_n_1464398.html canada’s conservative class war | 59 canada’s conservative class war: using austerity to squeeze labour at the expense of economic growth —toby sanger1 introduction this time was different. in contrast with previous post-war recessions, the 2008/9 economic crisis was unquestionably caused by an internal crisis of capitalism. canada’s two previous recessions in the past half-century were directly caused by the federal government hiking interest rates to slow economic growth and reduce the pace of wage increases, ostensibly to reduce inflation. while the recent economic crisis was not caused by similar higher interest rate policies, reactions to it with an austerity agenda and other measures to suppress wages were designed to accomplish the same thing: a weakening of the power of workers in relation to capital and a further shrinking of labour’s share of national income. this is despite the fact that the negative impacts of these economic policies on the distribution of national income and economic growth are now quite broadly accepted among economists. even the international monetary fund (imf) and the organization for economic cooperation and development (oecd) have publicly stated that a more equitable distribution of income would lead to stronger economic growth (imf, 2011; oecd, 2011; 2012). however, canadian and other governments have largely rejected these policies. the question is why? this paper argues that the conservative federal government’s macroeconomic cyclical policies, characterized by austerity and additional neoliberal measures, are designed not to respond to short-term economic problems but to further entrench a shift in the national income away from labour to capital at the expense of stronger economic growth. this is evident in an analysis of the 2012 conservative budget, which not only cut public spending, but also put in place measures that will 1 toby sanger is senior economist for the canadian union of public employees. 60 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism lead to a corrosion of wages, thereby reducing economic demand and making the state of household finances more treacherous. the absence of a political counter-weight to capital has meant that the half-hearted attempts at structural reform to reduce the likelihood of further financial crises have been overtaken by business-as-usual economic policies that will increase inequality, weaken economic growth and ultimately result in another cycle of economic crises. history suggests there will be little prospect of even moderate progressive change without increased social and political mobilization and the emergence of more radical threats to challenge the power of capital. this recession was different in the three years prior to the start of the 1981/2 and 1990/1 recessions, the bank of canada almost doubled its short-term interest rate, which also pushed up mediumand longer-term rates (see figure 1). this hiking of short-term interest rates to over 10 percent reduced investment, increased personal and business bankruptcies and pushed the unemployment rate to over 10 percent for four years after these recessions (statistics canada, 2012). the economic decline, lower government revenues, higher social spending and these higher interest rates also caused large increases in government deficits and deficit ratios (finance canada, 2012). coming out of these recessions, canadian governments embarked on deficit-cutting crusades, largely through cuts to program spending along with public sector wage freezes and constraints to “share the pain” with public sector workers. despite contractionary fiscal policies, canada’s economy was ultimately able to grow at reasonable rates coming out of these previous recessions because of expansionary monetary policies. as figure 1 illustrates, the bank of canada cut its key interest rate by more than half following both the 1981/2 and 1990/1 recessions, providing a very large monetary stimulus for the economy. lower interest rates relative to the united states also helped reduce the value of the canadian dollar in the years following these recessions, providing a big boost to canada’s net exports.2 canada faced a completely different situation in the 2008/9 recession. instead of hiking interest rates, the bank of canada steeply cut its key lending rate going into the downturn. as the economic crisis 2 in the years following the early 1980s recession, the value of canada’s dollar declined from over us $0.86 in 1980 to us $0.71 in early 1986. following the early 1990s recession, the value of canada’s dollar declined from a high of over us $0.88 in october 1991 down to below us $0.70 by 1998 (statistics canada, 2012). canada’s conservative class war | 61 progressed, the bank of canada further reduced its lending rate to record lows and has remained at close to historical lows since, with further monetary stimulus provided through “quantitative easing” and other extraordinary financial market measures.3 consequently, the canadian economy has had little capacity to grow through further monetary stimulus as it did in the recoveries following previous post-war recessions. instead, interest rates are widely expected to be increased, which will not only slow economic growth with lower investment, but are also likely to precipitate a long overdue ‘correction’ for canada’s housing market. while canada’s federal conservative government engaged in stimulus measures in its 2009 and 2010 budgets to bring the economy out of the financial and economic crisis, most of these measures were time-limited to two years only. since then, the harper government has strongly promoted contractionary fiscal policies both domestically and internationally, with successive spending cuts at the federal level and advocacy of fiscal austerity through the g20. these measures are causing unnecessary economic harm, particularly without the potential for offsetting monetary stimulus to mitigate the damage. as a result of austerity budgets, countries around the world including canada are suffering from slow economic growth, with the u.k. and a number of other european countries forced into secondary recessions in 2012. with their economies weakening, these spending cuts have perversely increased the debt burdens of many countries instead of reducing them (thomas and jolly, 2012). as a result, even the imf called for countries to focus on policies to strengthen growth over “fiscal consolidation” in its october 2012 world economic outlook (imf, 2012). while the 2008/9 financial and economic crisis was the result of internal crises of capitalism, these secondary recessions and resulting slow growth have been by design. as even traditionally neoliberal organizations such as the imf have advised against these policies because they will slow economic growth, it is becoming ever more apparent that they are being implemented for political economy reasons: to strengthen the power of capital and weaken the power of labour as part of the longer term project of capital. 3 “quantitative easing” involves central banks creating money to directly purchase assets such as bonds on financial markets. this is usually focused on longer-term assets in order to reduce longer-term interest rates. 62 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism labour’s declining share successive contractionary fiscal policies together with other forms of direct and indirect wage suppression led to a steep decline in the rate of wage increases in both the private and public sectors following the post-war recessions. figure 2 shows the rate of private and public wage increases in large collective agreements, illustrating sharp declines following both the 1981/2 and 1990/1 recessions. while inflation was also reduced, wage increases were lower, leading to real wage declines. these real wage declines took up to a decade of economic growth to recover from, especially for public sector workers. these periods of wage suppression ushered in a long-term shift in the share of national income from labour to capital. neoclassical economic growth models generally assume that labour and capital’s shares of national income stay roughly constant over time: this was one of kaldor’s “stylized facts” about long-term economic growth (kaldor, 1957). fluctuations over the economic cycle are expected to occur – with more volatile corporate profits reducing capital’s share and labour’s share increasing during recessions – but over the long term these shares were expected to be fairly constant. instead the past three decades have brought a longer-term decline in labour’s share together with a long-term increase in capital’s share of national income in both canada and many other industrialized countries (oecd, 2012). the cyclical decline for profits in the recent recession was a short-lived blip in the long-term trend toward increasing shares of national income going to capital and diminishing shares going to labour (oecd, 2012). in the united states, labour’s share recently reached its lowest recorded level since numbers were first kept in 1947, and more than 10 percent below its pre-2000 level (federal reserve bank of st louis, 2012).4 within the household share of national income, inequality has also reached levels not seen since the 1930s, with a high share of the income gains going to the top one percent of the income distribution. the share of national income going to the top one percent reached 14 percent in 2007, almost double their share of the 1970s and 1980s (veall, 2012). the shrinking share of labour in national income has become so significant 4 these figures underestimate the decline because much executive compensation, bonuses and stock options are actually included in labour income. the share of this top 1 percent recently escalated to the highest share of labour income since the 1930s (hein, 2011, p.11-16). if the top 1 percent of income earners are excluded, the drop in labour’s share of national income in canada is close to double the rate when the wealthiest are included, from 1990 to the mid-2000s (oecd, 2012, p.115). canada’s conservative class war | 63 that even neoliberal organizations such as the oecd and the imf have recently raised concern. the oecd included a chapter on “labour losing to capital: what explains the declining labour share” in its 2012 employment outlook (oecd, 2012), following the imf’s chapter on “the globalization of labor” in their 2007 world economic outlook (imf, 2007). a recent oecd paper states clearly that declining labour shares and growing inequality are likely to slow down the economic recovery as well as endanger social cohesion. together with the imf’s previous analysis on this issue, the oecd argues that the main factor reducing labour’s share of national income has been technological change and capital deepening. in particular, the spread of information and communication technologies has led to the elimination of jobs involving routine tasks with machines leading to much greater polarization of employment and pay within the labour market. this report (oecd, 2012) now acknowledges that neoliberal economic policies – those they have advocated for for decades – have had a significant impact in reducing labour’s share of income. these include increasing trade and globalization, outsourcing, privatization, reduction in workers bargaining power and changes in collective bargaining. in terms of collective bargaining structures, it notes that governments and employers have used both centralized and decentralized bargaining structures – whatever works, often imposing settlements – to constrain wages, thereby reducing labour’s share of pay and income. increasing financialization of the economy – switching from the principle of “retain and invest” to “downsize and distribute” – has also significantly weakened workers’ bargaining power (lazonick and sullivan, 2000), as well as eroded economic growth. other studies have found that levels of government spending and employment protection also have a strong impact on the distribution of national income between capital and labour (harrison, 2002) numerous studies have found that increasing globalization led to lower shares for labour in higher wage countries (guscina, 2007). labour’s share in most other regions of the world also declined following increased globalization (rodriguez and jayadev, 2010; tytell and jaumotte, 2008). increased openness to trade has been associated with higher income inequality in industrialized countries by many (guscina, 2007), while employment protection policies are associated with lower rates of inequality. inequality has also increased in most emerging countries, with the exception of some countries with antipoverty programs and strong social and employment protections, such as brazil and indonesia (oecd, 2011, p.51-64). 64 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism the shifts between these sectors are far greater when one considers accumulated capital rather than income. following keynesian national income accounting frameworks, analysis of our macro-economy focuses more on income than on capital measures. this is problematic (especially for a system called “capitalism”) and is no doubt why so many economists remained blind to the growing imbalances of accumulated capital and the precariousness of a consumer debt-fuelled asset boom. the balance sheets of corporate and household sectors reflect these shifts. public attention is usually focused on the annual balance – deficits or surpluses – of the government sector. a more remarkable trend is the unprecedented shift in savings and surpluses from the household sector to the corporate sector in the 2000s. from at least 1960 until the late 1990s, the household sector recorded surpluses year after year which were invested in corporations to finance their capital investments. this relationship completely changed at the turn of this century. as figure 4 shows, from 2000 onwards canadian non-financial corporations have run massive surpluses (profits in excess of their capital investments), accumulating an additional $500 billion in cumulative surpluses. the total is even higher if the surpluses of banks and other financial corporations are included. these funds have been put into financial investments, used to reduce debt or buy back stock, or are sitting as excess cash or “dead money” as they were notably described by bank of canada governor mark carney (carmichael, 2012). by 2011, canadian corporate debt-to-equity ratios reached record lows. meanwhile, slow wage and income growth together with rising house prices resulted in unprecedented deficits for individuals and households and record rates of household indebtedness.5 the economic crisis and the crisis in neoliberal economics while most western governments continued to implement supply-side economic policies, these growing imbalances and inequalities created an ever more unstable economy. an overgrown and under-regulated financial sector, large pools of speculative financial investments and growth financed by household debt masked a stagnant underlying economy. 5 in the fourth quarter of 2011, the credit market debt of canadian non-financial corporations had dropped to below 54 percent of the value of their equity, down from over 90 percent in 1994. on the other hand, the credit market debt of canadian households reached a record high of over 163 percent in the second quarter of 2012, almost double the 85 percent rate it was in 1990 (statistics canada, 2012). the ratio of household debt to disposable income is now at record highs in canada while these ratios have declined in other countries. for instance, in the united states household credit market debt has declined by about 7 percent in gross terms from 2007 to 2012 (federal reserve bank of st louis economic research data, 2012). canada’s conservative class war | 65 when the financial house of cards finally started to collapse in 2007/8, it sparked a financial crisis, credit crunch, evaporation of business credit and an economic crisis, marking the first downturn in global gdp since the 1930s. fortunately, governments around the world had learnt from the great depression and responded relatively swiftly and in a coordinated fashion, providing extraordinary sources of credit to business, bailing out the financial industry, reducing interest rates to all-time lows (in some cases negative) and introducing fiscal stimulus spending measures to counteract the economic downturn and prevent an even deeper economic decline. the almost complete reversal of neoliberal supplyside policies that had ruled for decades belied previous claims that that they were impossible or would be damaging for the economy. the fact that neoliberal organizations like the imf and the oecd now acknowledge that growing income inequality is damaging for the economy is a significant reversal for these organizations after decades of advocating supply-side trickle-down economic policies (imf, 2011; oecd, 2011, 2012).6 it also reflects a growing crisis within neoliberal economics. in canada, don drummond, former chief economist of td bank and former federal associate minister of finance, recently confessed that, despite governments implementing most of the public policy changes he had advocated – including tax cuts, free trade, competition, labour market flexibility deregulation, etc – productivity in canada had actually deteriorated (drummond, 2011). this confession followed just five years after he claimed all economists agreed on these policy measures – and after advocating that ontario cut its public spending at twice the rate as during the 1990s! (drummond, 2011; sanger, 2011). also notable, the former chief and deputy chief economist of canada’s department of foreign affairs and international trade, dan ciuriak, recently co-authored a paper publicly questioning the alleged benefits of trade policy and other conventional wisdoms of economics, including supply-side economic measures, privatization, labour market flexibility, and other market-based incentive measures in their provocatively entitled paper, “what if everything we know about economic policy is wrong?” (ciuriak and curtis 2011). despite this very fundamental questioning and repudiation of neoliberal economic policies by former advocates (even if they did not offer 6 while these organizations have reflected similar concerns in some of their other policy prescriptions for canada and other countries, they may not be reflected in more extensive reconsiderations of their approach. often their concern is focused on how inequalities in the distribution of personal income might threaten “social cohesion” rather than on how changes in the distribution of national income are affecting economic and political relations. 66 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism alternatives), there has been no such questioning of these policies by canada’s federal conservative government. instead, they accelerated the implementation of these policies despite ample evidence that some of these measures will likely weaken economic growth. canada’s conservative government initially denied that the country was in recession in late 2008. only when a coalition of opposition parties threatened to replace them as government did they acknowledge there was a real problem, proroguing parliament and implementing stimulus spending measures. the discretionary fiscal policy that resulted was far more expansionary than in previous recessions in canada, and in particular government capital investment increased at a far faster pace.7 still, stimulus measures were unbalanced: spending measures and those benefiting workers or households were time-limited and temporary while tax cuts for business were made permanent. neoliberal austerity and manufactured recessions following this close brush with worldwide depression and questioning of the validity of neoliberal economics, many hoped it would lead to some positive structural measures to stabilize the economic system and at least marginally reduce inequalities, as had eventually happened after both the 19th century “long depression” and the 1930s great depression. by 2012, such hopes had pretty much evaporated. instead, crude keynesian policies drove up deficits, which were subsequently used to justify austerity budgets, cuts to employment protection, retirement security, social spending, other government programs and the weakening of environmental regulations. at the same time, businesses had not used their accumulated and growing surpluses to make productive investments, exacerbating the problem of stagnation. the conservative government’s focus on spending cuts belies the fact that the federal government is in a much better fiscal situation than after previous recessions. while government deficits increased as a result of the economic crisis and stimulus measures, as a ratio of gdp they are still far below the rates they reached during the 1990s. with low borrowing rates, debt servicing costs for canadian governments are about half of what they were during the mid-1990s (figure 5). 7 statistics canada figures show that general government gross fixed capital formation (investment) increased to a share of 4.75 percent of canada’s economy (gdp) in the fourth quarter of 2010 from a low of below 3 percent a decade earlier, an increase of over 50 percent. in contrast, during the recessions of the early 1980s and 1990s, government capital investment increased to no more than 4 percent of the economy, hikes of only about 10 percent (statistics canada, 2012). canada’s conservative class war | 67 the on-going shift in national income and accumulated surpluses towards capital mean that canada’s non-financial corporations were, by 2012, sitting on over $526 billion in excess cash, up 42 percent since the recession ended in mid-2009. this amount is equivalent to 30 percent of gdp: just a small proportion could provide a significant boost to the economy and to household incomes. as bank of canada governor mark carney stated, canadian companies are in “historically rude health, have the means to act -and the incentives,” calling their surpluses “dead money” (carney, 2011; carmichael, 2012). despite exhortations from carney and finance ministers in the provinces and federally, corporations have done little to invest their surpluses back into the economy (isfeld, 2012). in response, the obvious route would be for governments to tax this excess cash and use it to undertake productive investments, redistribute income and reduce household debt and inequality through the expansion of public services or direct transfers. while public spending quite appropriately increased during the recession, it remains a relatively small share of the economy. in fact, total public spending of all governments in canada as a share of gdp dropped to at least a 30 year low just prior to the economic crisis (figure 6). the increase during the past few years is as much a result of the shrinking of the underlying economy as it is of increased public spending: with a growing economy, this ratio will gradually decline. with existing fiscal policies, the federal government would be in a structural surplus of over $25 billion, as the parliamentary budget officer demonstrated in his september 2012 fiscal sustainability report (parliamentary budget officer, 2012b). in other words, as the economy grows to its full capacity, the federal deficit would soon be eliminated. in addition, federal and provincial deficits could be eliminated much faster with a few fair tax measures, there is no need for deep spending cuts and austerity measures to balance these budgets. instead, we should see public spending cuts as politically-driven, constituting “janus” or two-faced austerity (fanelli and hurl, 2010). fanelli and hurl examined how conservative budgets between 2006 and 2010 had constitutionalized neoliberalism and used austerity arguments to weaken labour and social protections while at the same time fuelling capital accumulation through tax cuts, privatization and increased neoliberalism. after winning a majority in the 2011 federal election, the conservatives’ political and economic agenda became even more transparent in what some described as their “transfor68 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism mative” 2012 budget (ibbitson, 2012). extending fanelli and hurl’s analysis, i now examine the 2011 and 2012 budgets and their impact on the distribution of national income between capital and labour.8 conservative budgets, the attack on workers’ wages and labour’s share the 2011 and 2012 federal conservative budgets have focused on constraining public and private sector wages, reducing employment protections and weakening workers’ bargaining power; expanding free trade and corporate property rights; increasing resource extraction and weakening environmental protections; reducing taxation of capital; and implementing selective austerity and increased privatization. as we have seen above, each of these is associated with shrinking labour’s share of national income, increasing capital accumulation and increasing inequalities. constraining public and private sector wages public sector wage constraints and freezes have been politically justified for fiscal reasons, garnering public support as a fair way for public sector workers to “share the pain” along with private sector workers suffering from the economic crisis. this is despite evidence that wages and salaries in the public sector are, on average, very similar to wages for similar jobs in the private sector but are much more equitable, with less of a wage gap for women and lower paid workers, and less excessive compensation at the top (sanger 2011b). much less overtly disclosed was one of the federal government’s reasons for constraining public sector wages, which was to suppress wage increases in the private sector as well. in a court affidavit, in response to a court challenge of the federal government’s wage constraint measures by the association of justice counsel, canada’s associate deputy minister of finance, paul rochon (2011, p.20), stated: “the era’s [expenditure review act] policy objectives were complementary elements of the government’s larger economic and fiscal policy. these objectives were threefold: 1. to help reduce upward pressure on private sector wages and salaries; 2. to provide leadership by showing restraint and respect for public money; and 3. to manage public sector wage costs in an appropriate and predictable manner that would help ensure the ongoing soundness of the government’s fiscal position.” 8 the focus here is very much on the federal government, although some provincial governments have also implemented similar measures. canada’s conservative class war | 69 this was a rare admission of the government’s broader economic objectives: to squeeze private sector wages and ultimately reduce labour’s share of national income; but canada is of course not alone on this. the european central bank previously published a number of studies urging governments to squeeze public sector wages so that private sector wages would also be reduced “in order to enhance economic stability and competitiveness in the economic and monetary union” (holm-hadulla et al, 2010, p.4; afonso and gomes, 2010; fernàndez-de-córdoba et al., 2009; lamo et al., 2008). the subsequent policies of many governments in europe to cut public sector wages were developed and implemented with this in mind. after winning a majority government in the 2011 federal election, the conservatives made their objective of squeezing workers’ wages much more transparent in their 2012 budget. while some measures were rationalized for fiscal reasons, others were focused at more directly limiting wage growth in the private sector. first, the government announced new rules to allow employers to pay temporary foreign workers wages 15 percent below the prevailing rate, and fast-tracked approvals for skilled workers to no more than ten days (less time than it takes canadian banks to clear cheques on foreign banks). second, the conservatives eliminated employment insurance (ei) benefits for claimants who fail to take jobs at up to less than 30 percent below their previous wage. as well, they abolished the employment insurance tribunal and delegated ei appeals to a much smaller centralized social services tribunal also responsible for dealing with canadian pension plan and old age security (oas) appeals, with members directly appointed by the federal government, thereby eliminating balance and local input into the appeals process and directly enforcing the government’s directives. third, the government eliminated the federal fair wage and hours of labour act, meaning that contractors on federal construction jobs can pay their workers as little as the minimum wage, accelerating the proverbial race to the bottom (cupe, 2012). these measures follow the harper government’s repeated curtailment of the right to strike by legislating workers under federal jurisdiction back to work with little hesitation, including rail workers at canadian pacific, airline workers at air canada and postal workers at canada post. in the case of postal workers, they also directly intervened to reduce wage increases below the rates previously offered by their employer. these actions sent a strong message that this federal government would not allow workers to exercise their right to collectively withdraw their labour through strikes, thereby undermining canada’s system of free collective bargaining (fanelli and lefebvre, 2011). 70 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism one of the most controversial measures in the 2012 budget – the increase in the retirement age to 67 to qualify for oas benefits – was rationalized and promoted by the harper government as a necessary change required to ensure that public pensions would be fiscally sustainable. as the finance minister jim flaherty (2012, p.6) stated in his budget speech, “today it is clear we must take action to ensure the sustainability of the old age security program, which is the largest spending program of the federal government.” however the increase in the age of retirement was made much more for political and labour market reasons – to increase the supply of labour by requiring workers to work longer before collecting retirement benefits – than for fiscal reasons. canada’s parliamentary budget officer, kevin page, released a report in 2012 demonstrating that the federal government’s oas and guaranteed income supplement (gis) programs are already on a fiscally sustainable path. while the costs of these benefits are forecasted to rise to a peak of 3.2 percent of gdp by 2031 from the current level of 2.2 percent of gdp, they are then set to ultimately decline to 1.8 percent of gdp – below current rates (parliamentary budget officer, 2012a, p.ii). the federal conservative government’s move to increase the age of retirement was introduced together with other measures to directly increase incentives for later retirement followed lobbying by the canadian chamber of commerce (ccc) for changes to get seniors to work more, but went further than the ccc was prepared to publicly advocate (canadian chamber of commerce, 2011). layoffs of public sector workers and cuts in the 2012 federal budget will reduce employment by approximately 40,000. job losses increase to well over 100,000 when taking account of cuts in the previous two budgets and spending cuts by provincial governments wages (parliamentary budget officer, 2012a; 2012b). together with cuts to public services, these job losses will also weaken workers’ bargaining power and lead to a broader erosion of wages. expansion of free trade agreements and corporate property rights the conservative government’s relentless pursuit of free trade deals with countries and trading blocs around the world are also a major factor in strengthening the power of corporate capital, weakening labour and limiting the democratic powers of governments. the federal government now has eighteen different sets of free trade agreements in negotiation or discussion and has concluded six others in the past three years (canada department of foreign affairs and international trade, 2012). gaining canada’s conservative class war | 71 better access for trade of goods is actually a minor element of most of these deals: the real interest is in eliminating “non-tariff barriers” – such as local content provisions and marketing boards – and expanding corporate property rights, including patent protection. in fact, canada’s trade balance with countries that it has signed major trade deals has become worse than with countries that it doesn’t have trade deals with. as jim stanford has noted, “if the policy goal (sensibly) is to boost exports and strengthen the trade balance, then signing free trade deals is exactly the wrong thing to do” (stanford 2012, n.p.). increasing resource extraction and weakening of environmental protections the conservatives’ 2012 federal budget bill also significantly expanded the power of corporate capital over canada’s natural or environmental resources through numerous measures that roll-back environmental protections and accelerate resource extraction (sierra club of canada, 2012). these included the elimination of and deep cuts to environmental protection programs and protective legislation to the extent that it was even criticized by a former conservative minister of fisheries (halifax chronicle herald, 2012). it has also gone on the attack against environmental organizations, denouncing them as “extremists” funded by foreign money, threatening their charitable status and, in a move redolent of the mccarthy and bennett era, adding some of them to the list of potential terrorists along with anti-capitalist groups. this follows the harper government’s leadership in scuttling the kyoto accord and resistance to any significant measures to address climate change. weakened environmental protections and increased resource extraction significantly increases capital accumulation by speeding the appropriation of natural resource rents. reducing taxation of capital capital accumulation has also been significantly increased through cuts to corporate and capital taxes at the federal level and strong pressure and billions in support from the federal government to provinces to reduce corporate tax rates and remove sales taxes from business inputs. corporate tax rates have been cut even further despite evidence that these tax cuts have not stimulated investment but, on the contrary, have been associated with declining rates of business investment (figure 7). instead, these corporate tax cuts have been far more successful at increasing capital accumulation at the expense of labour, in addition to increasing deficits to provide a rationale for selective austerity measures. 72 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism selective austerity and privatization selective austerity measures have included elimination of funding for civil society organizations, including any involved in “advocacy”. many of these measures have been discussed elsewhere (see, for example, fanelli and hurl 2010). however, recent measures expanded the involvement and control of capital over public services and public policy in some notable ways beyond the traditional scope of commercialization, contractingout, public-private partnership and asset-sale privatizations beyond that already being implemented. these include providing business employers with much greater say over the selection of permanent immigrants (in addition to the often exploitative power they have over temporary foreign workers), use of development assistance funds to help promote canadian mining firms abroad, exploring the use of social impact bonds and introducing legislation to allow private ownership of first nations land (mendleson, 2012; leblanc, 2012; wingrove, 2012). concluding remarks with current economic policies in place, prospects for a healthy recovery will remain meager in canada. lower interest rates cannot provide the stimulus for economic recovery they did following previous recessions. household debt is at record levels and a housing price bust is imminent. business is failing to reinvest its growing surpluses into productive capital investments and export expansion is largely limited to resources. with canadian governments slashing public spending, contractionary fiscal policy is creating the conditions for another lost decade. the federal conservative government has not only used the economic crisis as an opportunity to impose selective austerity measures which are slowing the economy, but are also using it to accelerate neoliberal economic policies that will further shrink labour’s share of income and increase that of capital. this is being done at a time when the economic crisis has provoked a number of high profile neoliberal economists to question their fundamental economic policies and prescriptions. with the bankruptcy of neoliberal economic policies, it is difficult to reach any other conclusion except that the conservative government is continuing to aggressively implement neoliberal policies for political reasons: to expand the power of capital and to weaken the power of labour in a continued class war. as warren buffett, one of the wealthiest men in the world, once stated: “there’s class warfare, all right, but it’s my class, the rich class, that’s making war, and we’re winning.” (stein 2006). canada’s conservative class war | 73 one of the great achievements of neoliberal economic theory was the perpetuation of the illusion that economics is a science and that its analysis can be divorced from consideration of economic and political power, as well as human and social behavioral considerations. while some in the economics profession may continue to cling to these illusions, many are moving beyond it. for example, joseph stiglitz, the prominent new keynesian economist and nobel-prize winner, is only one of many who are now declaiming how appropriation of political and economic power by a small elite is endangering our future but also entreating them to support new policies (stiglitz, 2012). but entreaties to the one percent to embrace different economic policies will likely have little effect unless the alternatives are starker and they feel more threatened. it may be largely forgotten now but at the time of the last major global crisis of capitalism, john maynard keynes felt compelled to address the power of vested interests in his conclusion to the general theory (keynes, 1936, n.p.) “the ideas of economists and political philosophers, both when they are right and when they are wrong, are more powerful than is commonly understood. indeed the world is ruled by little else. practical men, who believe themselves to be quite exempt from any intellectual influences, are usually the slaves of some defunct economist. madmen in authority, who hear voices in the air, are distilling their frenzy from some academic scribbler of a few years back. i am sure that the power of vested interests is vastly exaggerated compared with the gradual encroachment of ideas. not, indeed, immediately, but after a certain interval; for in the field of economic and political philosophy there are not many who are influenced by new theories after they are twenty-five or thirty years of age, so that the ideas which civil servants and politicians and even agitators apply to current events are not likely to be the newest. but, soon or late, it is ideas, not vested interests, which are dangerous for good or evil.” these concluding comments of keynes were clearly made in a different world. the threats to capital and the elite were far more present with the strength of the soviet union and growing appeal of socialism in the west. his ideas and approach provided a much more palatable alternative for the vested interests than the other threats they were facing in the world of ideas and politics at that time. 74 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism while conventional, keynesian, new keynesian and even postkeynesian economic solutions may appear convincing to some on their own, even their marginal changes have little chance of being adopted unless the growing power of the “vested interests” also considers them in their interests – or at least, a lesser threat than the alternatives. for some in this class, the occupy movement is starting to have that effect. american billionaire jeff greene recently warned (pressier, 2012, n.p.): “there are all these people in this country who are just not participating in the american dream at all. right now, for some bizarre reason, a lot of these people are supporting republicans who want to cut taxes on the wealthy. at some point, if we keep doing this, their numbers are going to keep swelling, it won’t be an obama or a romney. it will be a hollande. a chávez.” while neoliberal economic policies are being increasingly questioned and abandoned by economists, politicians – including canada’s conservative federal government – continue to implement them for purely political and ideological reasons: to further concentrate economic and political power among the owners of capital and to weaken the power of labour. with these conditions, it should be increasingly apparent that there will be little prospect of even moderate change without increased social and political mobilization and the emergence of more radical threats to challenge the power of capital. canada’s conservative class war | 75 figures figure 1 source: bank of canada interest rates: bank of canada rate. http://www.bankofcanada.ca/rates/interest-rates/ 76 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism figure 2 sources: statistics canada consumer price index (cansim table 326-0021); human resources and skills development canada annual wage settlements. http://www.hrsdc.gc.ca/eng/ labour/labour_relations/info_analysis/datas/wages/in dex.shtml figure 3 source: statistics canada gdp income-based (cansim table 380-0001). canada’s conservative class war | 77 figure 4 sources: statistics canada, financial flows (cansim tables 378-0018, 378-0019 and 378-0040). 78 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism figure 5 source: statistics canada, fiscal reference tables, http://www.fin.gc.ca/pub/frt-trf/index-eng.asp canada’s conservative class war | 79 figure 6 source: statistics canada provincial and territorial economic accounts data tables 1 and 6. (publication #13-018x). http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/13-018-x/2011001/tab-eng.htm 80 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism figure 7 sources: statistics canada, gdp expenditure-based (cansim table 380-0002); oecd tax database (part ii, table ii.1). http://www.oecd.org/tax/taxpolicyanalysis/oecdtaxdatabase.htm canada’s conservative class war | 81 references afonso, a. and gomes, p.m. (2010). interactions between private and public sector wages. iza discussion papers 5322, institute for the study of labor (iza).http://ftp.iza.org/dp5322.pdf canadian chamber of commerce. (2011, december). incenting seniors to continue working. http://www.chamber.ca/images/uploads/reports/201 1/1112incentingseniors_to_ continueworking.pdf carmichael, k. (2012, august 22). free up ‘dead money,’ carney exhorts corporate canada. the globe and mail. http://www.theglobeandmail. com/report-on-business/economy/free-up-deadmoney-carneyexhorts-corporate-canada/article4493091/ carney, m. (2011, december 12). growth in the age of deleveraging. speech to the empire club of canada/canadian club of toronto. http://www. bankofcanada.ca/2011/12/speeches/growth-in-the-age-ofdeleveraging/ ciuriak, d. and curtis, j.m. (2011, april 1). what if everything we know about economic policy is wrong? http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1839647 canada department of foreign affairs and international trade. (2012). negotiations and agreements. http://www.international.gc.ca/tradeagreements-accords-commerciaux/agracc/index.aspx?view=d canadian union of public employees. (2012, march 29). conservative’s small-minded budget kills jobs and fails canadians: cupe’s analysis of the 2012 federal budget. http://cupe.ca/budget/federal-budget-analysis decloet, d. (2009, october 24). civil servants: it’s time to share the pain. globe and mail. http://advisor1.dynamic.ca/servlet/articlenews/story/ gam/20091024/rdecloet 24art1922 drummond, d. (2006). the economists’ manifesto for curing ailing canadian productivity. international productivity monitor, centre for the study of living standards, 13, 21-26. http://www.csls.ca/ipm/13/ipm-13drummond-e.pdf drummond, d. (2011). confessions of a serial productivity researcher. international productivity monitor, centre for the study of living standards, 22, 3-10. http://www.csls.ca/ipm/22/ipm-22-drummond.pdf fanelli, c. and c. hurl. (2010). janus-faced austerity: strengthening the ‘competitive’ canadian state. in fanelli, c., c. hurl, p. lefebvre and g. ozcan (eds.), saving global capitalism: interrogating austerity & working class responses to crises, alternate routes 2011 (pp. 29-50). ottawa: red quill books. fanelli, c. and p. lefebvre. (2011). the ottawa and gatineau museum workers’ strike. precarious employment and the public sector squeeze. in fanelli, c. and p. lefebvre (eds.), uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times, alternate routes 2012 (pp. 121-146). ottawa: red quill books. 82 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism flaherty, j. (2012, march 29). the budget speech. government of canada. http://www.budget.gc.ca/2012/rd-dc/speech-eng.pdf guscina, a. (2007).effects of globalization on labor’s share in national income. international monetary fund working papers 06/294. http://www. imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2006/wp06294.pdf hein, e. (2011). distribution, ‘financialisation’ and the financial and economic crisis – implications for post-crisis economic policies. mpra paper 31180, university library of munich, germany. http://www.ipeberlin.org/fileadmin/ downloads/working_paper/ipe_working_paper_ 09.pdf federal reserve bank of st louis economic research data. (2012). nonfarm business sector: labor share (prs85006173). http://research.stlouisfed. org/fred2/series/prs85006173?rid=47&soid=22 fernàndez-de-córdoba, g. (2009). public and private sector wages interactions in a general equilibrium model. working paper series 1099, european central bank. http://www.ecb.int/pub/pdf/scpwps/ecbwp1099.pdf finance canada. (2012). fiscal references tables. http://www.fin.gc.ca/frt-trf/2012/frt-trf-12-eng.asp halifax chronicle herald. (2012, june 10). ex-ministers assail changes to fisheries protection. halifax chronicle herald. http://thechronicleherald.ca/thenovascotian/105518-ex-ministers-assailchangesto-fisheries-protection harrison, a.e. (2002). has globalization eroded labor’s share? some crosscountry evidence. university of california at berkley and nber, mimeo. http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/39649/1/mpra_paper_39649.pdf holm-,” h. (2010). public wages in the euro area towards securing stability and competitiveness. occasional paper series 112, european central bank. http://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/scpops/ecbocp112.pdf ibbitson, j. (2012, march 29). flaherty’s plan forces you to expect less from ottawa. globe and mail. http://www.theglobeandmail.com/ news/politics/flahertys-plan-forces-you-toexpect-less-from-ottawa/ article627560/ imf. (2007). world economic outlook. http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/ weo/2007/01/data/index.aspx -----(2011, september). why inequality throws us off balance, finance and development. 48(3). http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/2011/09/index.htm -----(2012, october). world economic outlook,. http://www.imf.org/ external/pubs/ft/weo/2012/02/index.htm isfeld, g. (2012, september 25). flaherty urges businesses to open wallets, forge partnerships with emerging economies. financial post. http:// www.ottawacitizen.com/mobile/business/fpbusiness/flaherty+urges+ businesses+open+wallets+forge+partnerships+with/72 97401/story.html canada’s conservative class war | 83 kaldor, n. (1957). a model of economic growth. the economic journal, 67(268), 591-624. keynes, j.m. (1936).the general theory of employment, interest and money. cambridge: cambridge university press. http://www.marxists.org/ reference/subject/economics/keynes/generaltheory/ch24.htm lamo, a. (2008). public and private sector wages co-movement and causality. working paper series 963, european central bank. http://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/scpwps/ecbwp963.pdf leblanc, d. (2012, september 6). cida funds seen to be subsidizing mining firms. globe and mail. http://m.theglobeandmail.com/ news/politics/cida-funds-seen-to-be-subsidizingmining-firms/ article1360059/?service=mobile mendleson, r. (2012, april 20). canada immigration: jason kenney’s reforms will see employers selecting newcomers. huffington post. http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2012/04/20/canada-immigrationemployers-picknewcomers_n_1439992.html oecd. (2011, december). divided we stand: why inequality keeps rising. http://www.oecd.org/els/socialpoliciesanddata/49170475.pdf oecd. (2012, july). employment outlook 2012. http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/ employment/oecd-employment-outlook2012_empl_outlook-2012-en parliamentary budget officer. (2011, february 8). federal fiscal sustainability and elderly benefits. office of the parliamentary budget officer. http://www. parl.gc.ca/pbo-dpb/documents/sustainability_oas.pdf parliamentary budget officer. (2012a, april 24). pbo economic and fiscal outlook. http://www.parl.gc.ca/pbo-dpb/documents/efo_april_2012.pdf parliamentary budget officer. (2012b, september 27). fiscal sustainability report. http://www.pbo-dpb.gc.ca/files/files/fsr_2012.pdf pressier, j. (2012, july 29). the other barbarians at the gate. new york magazine. http://nymag.com/news/business/themoney/jeffgreene-2012-8/ radice, h. (2011). cutting government deficits: economic science or class war? in fanelli, c., c. hurl, p. lefebvre and g. ozcan (eds.), saving global capitalism: interrogating austerity & working class responses to crises, alternate routes 2011 (pp. 87-102). ottawa: red quill books. rochon, p. (2011, april 11). rochon affidavit at para. cited in respondents factum. ontario superior court of justice, cv-10-404604, p. 20. http:// ajc-ajj.net/files/library/02_-_agc_factum_part_1_of_3.pdf rodriguez, f. and a. jayadev. (2010).the declining labor share of income. human development research papers (2009 to present) hdrp2010-36, human development report office, united nations development programme. http://hdr.undp.org/en/reports/global/hdr2010/papers/ hdrp_2010_36.pdf 84 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism sanger, t. (2011a). fair shares: how banks, brokers and the financial industry can pay fairer taxes. ottawa: canadian centre for policy alternatives. -----(2011b). battle of the wages: who gets paid more, public or private sector workers? ottawa: canadian union of public employees. -----(2012). austerity doesn’t work: ontario can balance its budget while improving public services and tax fairness. ottawa: canadian union of public employees. sierra club of canada. (2012). the harper budget: assault on the environment for big oil profits: roundup of canadian environmental ngo responses. http://www.sierraclub.ca/en/main-page/harperbudget-assault-environment-bigoil-profits-roundup-canadianenvironmental-ngo-respo stanford, j. (2012, may 21). the troubling truth about free trade. globe and mail. http://www.theglobeandmail.com/commentary/the-troublingtruth-about-freetrade/article4186695/ statistics canada. (2012). cansim database. (labour force cansim table 282-0002; exchange rates cansim tables 176-0049; debt ratios cansim tables 378-0123 and 378-0124; investment shares of the economy cansim table 380-0064) http://www5.statcan.gc.ca/cansim/ stein, b. (2006, november 26). in class warfare, guess which class is winning. new york times. http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/26/ business/yourmoney/26every.html stiglitz, j. (2012). the price of inequality. new york: w. w. norton & co. thomas, l. jr. and d.jolly. (2012, october 22). despite push for austerity, european debt has soared. new york times. http://www.nytimes. com/2012/10/23/business/global/despite-push-for-austerityeu-debthas-soared.html?_r=0 tytell, i. & f. jaumotte. (2008). how has the globalization of labor affected the labor income share in advanced countries? imf working papers 07/298, international monetary fund. http://www.imf.org/ external/pubs/ft/wp/2007/wp07298.pdf veall, m. (2012). top income shares in canada: recent trends and policy implications. canadian journal of economics, 45(4), 1247-1272. wingrove, j. (2012, august 6). ottawa’s plan to allow private property on reserves reignites debate. globe and mail. http://www.theglobeandmail. com/news/politics/ottawas-plan-to-allow-privateproperty-onreserves-re-ignites-debate/article4466019/ telecommunication policy for whom? an analysis of recent crtc decisions vanda rideout carleton university structural theoretical considerations this paper critically examines political and sociological relations in public telecommunication policy by arguing that the canadian state has and continues to play an important role in forging and shaping a competitive telecommunication environment. federal telecommunication decisions approved by the state regulator, the canadian radio-television and telecommunications commission (crtc), are examined from the years 1977 to 1990. the pro-competitive policies approved by the crtc reflect the state's shift from regulating rates and capital expansion programs by monopoly telecommunication providers (bell canada and bc tel), toward permitting competition for an array of business services supplied by monopoly, as well as new, telecommunication providers. competition in telecommunication business services has, paradoxically, resulted in a more regulated telecommunication environment; one in which there is less regulation in the public interest but more regulation to manage market forces. structural theory (poulantzas, 1973, 1978; offe, 1984; mahon 1980, 1984; jessop, 1991) best allows us to analyze the role that the crtc takes in formulating pro-competitive telecommunication policy. to get a more complete picture of this it is necessary to interpret and analyze the state's responses to changes in the nature of capitalism. structural state theory reveals that the primary function of the state in a capitalist society is to serve the interests of the ruling class by creating and maintaining conditions favourable for capital accumulation. the state must also reduce the inherent conflicts between fractions of capital, the working class, and forces within civil society'. furthermore, the state has to create and maintain conditions of social harmony by producing policies which legitimize capitalist social relations. structural theory, therefore, explains how the relationship between the ruling class and the state is a complex one in which the state serves the capitalist class without appearing to do so. as part of its ideological function, the state re-defincs workers. alternate routes, volume 10, 1993 27 alternate routes. volume 10. 1993 civil society groups, and capitalists politically as individual subjects, a process that carnoy (1984:99) calls 'individualization'. this process of individualization, realized through legal and political ideology, isolates workers and capitalists from their respective class positions. this is why, in poulantzas' view, the capitalist class chooses a 'democratic state' as an expression of class power. the process of capitalist production defines the formation of classes, but the state reconstitutes buyers and sellers of labour politically as individual subjects, subjects free of any 'classbelongingness'. the state reinforces this belief by presenting itself "as representing the general interest of the competing groups" (carnoy, 1984:100). the dominant power bloc, capitalist fractions and relative a utonomy: poulantzas' (1973, 1978) work shows how the state provides the framework for struggles between dominant and subordinate classes, both reintegrated as 'individuals' detached from any class position. at the same time, the state provides the political arena for and is itself shaped by the class struggle. the state unifies the reintegrated dominant class and subordinate class so that capitalist society is reproduced in a class structure. nonetheless, contradictions arise through the relationship between the state and the dominant class, and through the state's relationship to the working class and civil society groups. poulantzas (1973:43-4) explains that the state plays a principle role in organizing and unifying the dominant class. he argues that the capitalist class is itself internally divided into a number of competing elements, substructures, or fractions. members of the dominant class compete among themselves, forging alliances in the process. frequently, alliances function under leadership of one of the fractions. the power alliance that these capital fractions make is called the power bloc. the leadership which unites the power bloc under its stewardship is the hegemonic fraction which guarantees that the general interest of the ruling class is realized through the state. structural theory moves beyond the notion that the state is the captive agent of the capitalist class, arguing instead that the state is relatively autonomous. as poulantzas (1978: 313) notes, this implies that there is a relative separation of economic power from political power hence, political struggles tend to conceal their economic and class basis. the state thus tends to constitute class unity for the capitalist class in isolation from the economic struggle. moreover, the relative autonomy 28 rideout/telecommunication policy of the state sanctions the unity of individual capitalists, reconstituted into fractions and a dominant bloc, to further their political ideological operation and to constitute their political interests. poulantzas's concept of the relative autonomy of the capitalist state is used to underline how the operations of the state correspond to the political interest of the dominant class. this means that the degree, extent, and form of the state's relative autonomy can only be examined with reference to the class struggle. both poulantzas (1973) and mahon (1984) argue that the concept of relative autonomy also means that other forces can advance and realize their interests. for example, as will be shown below, the crtc encourages a compromise of competing interests, but this does not mean that bell canada and bc tel are forced to make unlimited concessions to other dominant class fractions or to the subordinate class in order to maintain their privileged hegemonic position. according to jessop (1991:92), it is also important to examine the infra-structural power of the state in this context — the manner in which the state shapes the spatial, temporal, corporeal and social order of capitalist society. using the telecommunication regulatory process as an example, one can see that those 'closest' to state power benefit the most (i.e. bell canada, bc tel, unitel, bc rail/lightel, and the large telecommunication users), while those furthest away benefit the least. this process helps to further fragment the subordinate class's resistance. state regulation and unequal representation: mahon's (1980:160) contribution to structuralist theory is her explanation of how the state politically organizes the strategies and compromises necessary to maintain the capitalist system, while at the same time develops policies that benefit the leading fraction. she maintains that a regulatory agency's role is a dual one. first, it represents the interests of the regulated and it subordinates their interests to the long term interests of the hegemonic fraction. second, the regulatory agency is a special case because it is independent of regular state departments and the political apparatus. hearings are adversarial and are open to competing private inputs. furthermore, the agency's authority is linked to its capacity to make politically neutral technical judgements. a regulator)' agency is an "unequal structure of representation" (1980:159), a structure of bias that organizes the interests of various social forces around the core interests of the hegemonic fraction, thus creating an "equilibrium of compromises" 29 alternate routes, i olume 10, 1993 (1980:159). similarly, the state arranges and reorganizes the political relations of class domination through its policy agenda. in this way, the state supports and maintains political struggle through its function as a political organizer of various dominant fractions, non-dominant capitalists and subordinate classes. resulting compromises may give access to, and representation for, the subordinate class. all members of the subordinate class have been and continue to be, active participants in the regulatory process. while the conditions won by the subordinate class must be more than symbolic if their consent is to be secured, the regulatory process and policy compromises, on the whole, help to disorganize and fragment this class. the state also provides suitable conditions for the organization of capitalist fractions into a power bloc, while aiding in the reproduction of capitalist hegemonic domination. for example, compromises reached between bell/bc tel and the new telecommunication providers were created by the crtc in order to neutralize the threat to hegemony that could not be contained by normal functioning of the political apparatus of the state. the crtc is an instrument of hegemony because it arranges compromises that reflect a combination of the demands of the regulated (bell and bc tel), other capitalist fractions (the larger user groups and the new telecommunication providers), and subordinate classes. by applying structural analyses to crtc decisions, i will argue below that the settlement of these disputes and demands entails more than regulating telecommunication monopoly pricing and limiting competition. the crtc's decision to permit telecommunication competition in key areas furthers the interest of the whole capitalist class, not just a dominant fraction. pro-competition telecommunication decisions also serve dominant economic interests by facilitating the international integration of economies, a process reflected most notably by the canadau.s. free trade agreement. the state as crisis manager: when problems arise in the accumulation process the state responds with specific policies in order to maintain this process. responding to economic crisis through policy intervention, the state acts as a crisis manager (offe and range. 1982:253). state policy is an attempt to neutralize economic contradictions. such policies arc designed to enhance stability of the 30 rideoutatelecommunication policy whole capital accumulation process, rather than advance the interests of one dominant fraction. some policies are geared towards continental or global accumulation, such as the telecommunication enhanced service decisions. other policies reorganize the importance of exchange relationships among capital fractions. as offe (1982:254-6) argues, policy shifts subject the dominant bloc to new rules in order to provide for economic growth and the survival of the larger capitalist class. with its renewed role as crisis manager, the state shifts the focus of public policy to meet the competitive demands of private sector market criteria. at the same time, the policy shifts intensify class conflict by reinscribing these social and political struggles to the state administrative apparatus, such as the crtc. in canadian telecommunication, the dominant bloc (bell canada and bc tel) has been subjected to new rules. the old 'natural monopoly' has been changed in a number of specific areas: mobile telephone services; interconnection and private line voice service, terminal attachment, enhanced services; resale and sharing; rate rebalancing and the new resale and sharing application that permits existing and new telecommunication service providers to meet the demands of the large telecommunication users. structural telecommunication relations a structural model of state telecommunication relations is presented in figure 1. the model identifies the major participants in the power bloc, organized according to their structural position within the federal telecommunication system. the model helps to explain the relations evident in the telecommunication field as well as the policy strategies by capitalist fractions, the state, and subordinate classes. this section describes how each capital fraction and the subordinate class attempt to influence and change these relations. the dominant power bloc: (i) the established powers. it is useful to begin telecommunication policy analysis by identifying the dominant power bloc because the interests of these organizations set the pattern for other forces in the system. bell canada and bc tel are the established powers in telecommunication. until recently, their dominant position was met with only minor challenges from other capitalist fractions and from the 31 i liemate routes, volume 10, 1993 federal government. bell canada and bc tel held a virtual monopoly on local and long distance residential and business telephone communications. responding to earlier conflicts, the state regulated this bloc to meet the social demands of subordinate classes by holding the companies publicly accountable for rate increases and capital expansion plans (babe, 1990:91-101).' (ii) telecommunication domestic challengers. the major challenger to the hegemony of the established powers within the telecommunication industry has been cncp communications. cncp recently amalgamated with rogers communications and is now known as unitel. in 1979 cncp petitioned the crtc to allow it to connect to bell canada's network in order to provide voice service to its private line customers; cncp launched a similar challenge to bc tel's monopoly position in 1981 (telecom decisions crtc 79-11 and 81-24). 2 both crtc decisions allowed cncp customers dial-up access for its voice and data business services. similar challenges came from would-be telecommunication service providers such as challenge communications, harding communications, and call-net. they also lobbied the state for a 'liberalized' terminal attachment policy similar to the one granted cncp. the crtc responded with an interim decision followed by a final decision permitting terminal attachment to bell's telephone network (telecom decisions crtc 80-13 and 82-14). moreover, it was decided to permit residential customers to own their phones, rather than being obligated to rent them from the telephone companies. cncp communications made a second challenge to the dominant bloc in 1985. their application to the crtc requested approval to interconnect to bell canada and bc tel in order to provide long distance telephone services for their business customers. the subsequent crtc ruling (telecom crtc 85-19) is considered by many to be a watershed decision (janisch, 1986; stanbury, 1986; woodrow and woodside, 1986). although the crtc denied cncp's request to compete in long distance voice services and private voice services such as mts, wats and pbx, 3 telecom decision crtc 85-19 encouraged the formation of more powerful telecommunication-user affiliations, coalitions and lobby groups. 32 c3 c/3 u if £ b -z u v — 02 o 2 s— 3 -i 2 c 2 gfl 1 'e. r. u 4/ en o a c s 3 e e o o jj co e -1 3 cq en u.—. 13 en „^^ s=3< o*^ «c1cue o .§3.2 iu -s o ml« -3 s =s-3« 3 3 c_ teo^/b^ 0-0*3 <3 ft c^*3 co cj c-oo © § en g? g-2 « g c^u 3 « r9 y « «-3 3 o 3 »*s "—.si g 3 3 3 3 3 3-3 ojffi'g-^ ;!f co co co co co co • ai e-i <— c±333333332 e.o iy co co co co co c0"o o 3 c "3 e-ooooooosoume u 3 o en j 3 co o e"3 "3 ^ 3 a»rv-3 3 en 6 cj co d-co 3--: .; u c m («-h mr , «— 2(-h ohco co 3 3 3 ut-1 -u-3^ — •it h*«37j oh 37; o cjx) >-3 o >3§.-eoor, « p „ co s3 en o> o g s-'s 3 o3 3 e<_ w r ) o e o h j r;x5 e e 3 oi 3,3 o c ucr-}2u~ 3 '£ co 3 co ft on g-s ^oft 2"3 cm ^ c 2 c 1 5 3 3 .2 co d e 8 o -£u >^= !> en § cmgc ok •3 co. b0h 5^ 3^ « -v,2^ ._: 2 ^— 3 en c^ ft o . 3 u co ^.2^-2 ^3 «> 3 i e e-5 o « 5 cmo •2 3 e u u o.-2c e x. x. as — — 3 co co— — n x. as 73 < 3 e alternate routes, volume 10, 1993 the second major challenger, bc rail telecommunications lightel inc. (bcrl), participated in the recent crtc hearings for permission to provide long distance service (telecom public notice 199073). bcrl is a joint venture company operated by bc rail ltd., callnet, and lightel inc. it is not presently operational except as a legal paper organization. bc rail ltd. operates a microwave network. lightel, owned by call-net, operates a fibre route from toronto to fort erie and is also presently negotiating a right of way agreement with cn rail. call-net and lightel form a facilities-based reselling service. what is significant about the bcrl application is that call-net, as a re-seller of enhanced services and value added services, interconnects its switches to facilities leased from unitel. it also connects with the u.s. carrier, sprint, and has an exchange agreement with rochester communications inc. (interrogatories bcrl (bell) 14 sept 90100-105 1c2). bcrl plans to build a number of facilities in canada and another supplier (perhaps sprint) is to build facilities along the canadau.s. border. the bcrl application thus represents the creation of a potential bypass network. 4 as a microwave fibre network, bcrl could provide a private mts/wats-like service, selling only to large business users. rather than develop their own private networks, it would benefit the large telecommunication users to have one approved by the crtc in place. (iii) policy recommendations by telecommunication user associations. the list of telecommunication users in figure 1 reveals that a number of broad-based associations and coalitions have been formed. these act to unite competing capitalists into a counter-hegemonic bloc. the associations and coalitions, all heavy communication users, have combined into these lobby groups to influence and promote telecommunication competition in the state policy-making process. the members of the associations and coalitions represent various capital fractions such as finance, manufacturing, and service industries. they form the lion's share of the large corporate and business telecommunication users. the telecommunication users formed these umbrella associations to get cheaper, efficient, flexible, integrated, and specially designed telecommunication services. the large users and the new telecommunication providers recognize the importance and significance of telecommunication. telecommunication is no longer simply a business operating cost recent technological advances in the industry 34 rideout/telecommunication policy have generated new services which can be sold as commodities. unlike other goods, however, telecommunication service commodities have an never-ending life; they may be (re)commodified into various additional services and re-sold. cheaper and specialized services are, in the users' view, necessary in order to take advantage of competitive markets domestically, continentally, and internationally. canadians for competitive telecommunications (cct) includes the following groups and associations: canadian association of data and professional service organizations, canadian bankers association, canadian business equipment manufacturers association, canadian business telecommunications alliance, canadian federation of independent business, canadian organization of small business, canadian radio common carriers association, hotel association of canada, and the ontario hotel and motel association. formed after the crtc rejection of cncp's application in 1985, the coalition expected their united views to influence federal policy outcomes. their report. the crisis for canadian business: telecommunication rates and the public interest (1986), argues that policy makers should reduce long distance rates for the business community because industries involved in the distribution of goods and sen ices cannot improve their productivity in the face of excessive long distance rates. in canada, long distance rates represent the third highest business operating cost, after wages and capital expenditures. for example, long distance and private bulk line rates for teleordering and telemarketing are 50 to 100 percent higher in canada than in the united states. the cct report warns that if telecommunication rates are not lowered canadian businesses will simply bypass the canadian system and use american systems. two policy reports were prepared by the canadian bankers association (taylor, 1989) and the canadian business telecommunication alliance (cbta, 1989). the canadian bankers association, and specifically the royal bank, recommended that telecommunications should be set more firmly under federal jurisdiction and that policy should be centrally regulated. 5 the canadian business telecommunication alliance, following the position taken by the business council on national issues (langille, 1987:43-44), favoured a market driven telecommunication environment with less or no government regulation. both the canadian bankers association and cbta are ideologically aligned with neo-liberal demands for a return to tree enterprise'. 35 alternate routes, 1 olume 10. 1993 the communications competition coalition (ccc) was formed in november 1989 to lobby and influence the department of communications, the crtc, and other government departments and agencies. membership includes company presidents and corporate executive officers of 150 canadian corporations. 6 the ccc supports an economic policy model of telecommunications, one which relies on the market rather than a regulated duopoly. finally, the information technology association of canada (itac) represents approximately sixty members from information and technology companies. itac supports the free trade agreement, and argues that canadian businesses must be internationally competitive and that telecommunication policy must be restructured to meet these challenges (itac, 1989). these large telecommunication users have concentrated and consolidated their positions by forming these powerful pro-competition lobby groups in order to influence the federal government to pass telecommunication decisions which reflect their position. user coalitions and associations have made policy recommendations suggesting how the state should: (a) formulate general national policy; (b) ensure that all telecommunications fall under federal regulation; and (c) determine that there be little or no state regulation of telecommunications. (iv) bell canada's response. bell canada responded to the issue of what was, in their view, excessive state regulation by reorganizing itself into bell canada enterprises (bce). the reorganization was approved by the federal government's bill c-19 and telecom decision crtc 83-10. prior to bill c-19 bell was almost entirely state regulated; after the bce reorganization only telephone services were regulated. bell has also responded to increased competition by introducing major discounts for both residential and business users who call canadian and/or american destinations. the discount packages, 'between friends' and 'teleplus canada', are part of a large offensive mounted by bell to counter the various challengers (telecom decision crtc 88-19). other discount packages have been filed with the crtc for special purposes business long distance lines. one package, called megalink, is based on the international standard for integrated sen ices digital network (isdn) (surtecs, december 3, 199():b4). this discount package is aimed at medium and large corporate customers. a second response by bell canada is their plan to rebalance telephone rates it is claimed that if competition is permitted in long distance services, local rates will have to be rebalanced to counter the 36 hideout/telecommunication policy current subsidy they receive from long distance revenues (telecom decision crtc 88-4). bell's rate rebalancing proposal, and the phase iii costing study, reveals that in order to reduce long distance and mts/wats charges, subsidization would have to stop and local usage would have to increase (telecom decisions crtc 88-4; 89-17; 85-19). bell's proposal to increase residential subscribers' local rates is coupled with its support of some form of targeted subsidies for needy subscribers. targeted subsidies are part of the current discourse of telecommunication policy liberalization, a discourse that camouflages the effects of competition on low and fixed income subscribers. targeted subsidies do not address the needs of those subscribers who are currently barely able to maintain their services. similarly, they ignore regional disparities as well as the differences between urban and rural subscribers. bell has argued in various rebalancing proposals that long distance revenues subsidize local rates. yet, critical telecommunication writers (babe, 1990; mosco, 1990 a,b,c; roman, 1990) question bell's accounting allocation practices. tinker, leham and neimark (1988:188216) explain that, like other forms of information, accounting is a set of social practices that reflect and reinforce a dominant ideology. 7 they argue that accounting standards and terminology produce what is considered to be the objective reporting of business activity. they maintain that when accounting applications, standards and definitions are accepted and used by the state in a rational manner their importance is heightened. business accounting practices are legitimized by the state via taxation legislation and the acceptance by state regulators of business accounting practices audited by the private sector but not by the state. roman (1990:96-1 1 0) questions the whole accounting premise for rate rebalancing and costing in the telecommunication industry. he argues that the crtc has been making decisions based on accounting hypotheses used by bell and bc tel; hypotheses which are largely untested. the crtc does not provide independent audits. for example, an argument can be made that bell canada's claim that long distance rates subsidize local service is based on a particular costing method which justifies their request for rate rebalancing. babe (1990:121-6) reveals that bell does not have separate accounting practices for long distance and local services. consequently, it is difficult to identify which costs and expenses should go to which services. at best, the argument that local service is subsidized is an arbitrary assessment. others also question the premise that long distance rates subsidize 37 alternate routes, volume 10, 1993 local telephone service. melody (1982) claims that the reverse is true. huber (1987) argues that allocating true common costs is arbitrary and mysterious. hills (1989:131) suggests that telephone rates tend to be distance-related, making long distance calls more expensive than local calls, although in terms of costs to the enterprise they are cheaper. according to oettinger (1988), current pricing policies are 'fairy tales'; 'subsidies' are accounting constructs that allow for changes in political relationships. selecting a particular costing method helps to determine final corporate outcomes for tax purposes, shareholders return on investments, and the equitable position of business. the particular accounting methods a business chooses are not neutral, but are chosen to reflect the best position of the corporation to shareholders, the tax department, state regulators and/or stock market investors. the capitalist state and the crtc: an analysis of crtc telecommunication decisions from 1977 to 1990 is provided in figure 2. these decisions are pro-competitive, reflecting a 'liberalized' environment for canadian telecommunications. new telecommunication policy has been approved by the crtc to meet the demands of large telecommunication users and the new telecommunication providers. nonetheless, the crtc must also mediate the conflicts and compromises between the large user groups, would-be telecommunication providers, and bell canada and bc tel. in order to ensure economic survival of the larger capitalist class, the crtc has permitted competition in some key areas, thereby denying the telecommunication power bloc their monopoly position. by permitting more competition in mobile and cellular telephone service, the crtc allowed more companies to provide similar services to those offered by bell and bc tel. the crtc also approved cantel (rogers communications) as the national cellular radio service carrier (telecom decisions crtc 77-16; 84-10; 84-29; 87-13). considered a watershed decision. telecom decision crtc 791 1 , permitted cncp to interconnect to bell canada's network, allowing cncp to set up their own private business network. a second decision (telecom decision crtc 81-14) allowed cncp to interconnect with bc tel. the commission also permitted cncp to set its private line service rates 5 to 10 per cent lower than bell and bc tel. one exception to the pro-compctitivc rulings during this period 38 rideout/telecommunication policy figure 2 crtc pro-competition telecommunication decisions from 1977 to 1990 mobile and cellular radio telephone seivice telecommunication decision crtc 77-16 challenge v. bell canada telecommunication decision crtc 84-10 mobile/cellular interconnect to bell and bc tel telecommunication decision crtc 84-29 follow up to decision 84-10 telecommunication decision crtc 87-13 cantel national cellular radio telephone service interconnection and private line voice service telecommunication decision crtc 79-1 1 cncp interconnection with bell telecommunication decision crtc 81-24 cncp interconnection with bc tel telecommunication decision crtc 83-10 cncp rates for private line service telecommunication decision crtc 85-19 cncp denied competition in long distance service terminal attachment telecommunication decision crtc 80-13 telecommunication decision crtc 81-19 telecommunication decision crtc 81-21 telecommunication decision crtc 81-23 telecommunication decision crtc 82-14 telecommunication decision crtc 84-11 telecommunication decision crtc 84-12 telecommunication decision crtc 84-13 telecommunication decision crtc 84-14 telecommunication decision crtc 85-5 interim terminal attachment requirements bell interim terminal attachment requirements bell pre-hearing on terminal attachment competition standards for terminal attachment to bell attachment of subscriber terminal equipment terminal attachment tariffs by bell and bc tel terminal attachment to northwestel terminal attachment to terra nova terminal attachment for telex and twx equipment paradyne attachment for telex & twx equipment enhanced services telecommunication decision crtc 84-18 regulatory policy for enhanced services telecommunication decision crtc 85-17 identity & classification enhanced services telecommunication decision crtc 87-5 call-net's service only basic service telecommunication decision crtc 87-14 call-net's review of decision 87-5 telecommunication decision crtc 89-17 call-net illegal resale & sharing basic service resale and sharing telecommunication decision crtc 85-19 some resale & sharing permitted telecommunication decision crtc 87-1 resale & sharing of primary exchange voice telecommunication decision crtc 87-2 resale & sharing classifications and tariffs telecommunication decision crtc 90-2 resale & sharing teleglobe international service telecommunication decision crtc 90-3 resale & sharing of private line service source: adapted and extended from janisch et. al., 1987. 39 alternate routes, volume 10, 1993 was the denial of cncp's application to provide long distance public telephone services (telecom decision crtc 85-19). retreating from its former position, the crtc was concerned that cncp would not be able to provide universal service or offer the price discounts it forecasted in its business plan. 8 the crtc noted that cncp's net income would be negative for its first four years of operation, yet the next six years would provide a rate of return of 20.6 percent. hence, the crtc's refusal to permit cncp to compete in long distance telephone service appears to be primarily influenced by questions concerning the economic feasibility of cncp's plan. faced with challenges to its monopoly position, bell canada applied to the crtc to be given permission to liberalize its corporate rules (telecom decision crtc 80-13). the subsequent decision gave the telephone subscriber the choice of purchasing or leasing their phone sets. after five years the crtc followed this decision by extending terminal attachment to telex and twx equipment (telecom decisions crtc 81-19,21, 23; 82-14; 84-11, 12, 13, 14). in the area of enhanced services, the crtc permitted more competitors with less regulation. only bell's and bc tel's enhanced services would be regulated by the crtc. bell and bc tel had to make sure there would be no cross subsidization from their phone monopolies to lower their enhanced service rates. the crtc held both carriers accountable to make sure they would not participate in unfair competition practices. finally, the commission established a dispute resolution mechanism placing onus on the carrier to justify a denial of the resale and sharing of enhanced services to would-be providers (telecom decisions crtc 84-18; 85-17; 87-5, 14; 89-17). the rulings reached by the crtc on enhanced services helped to intensify disputes throughout the 1980s. bell and cncp denied the resale of enhanced services to call-net communications ltd. accepting bell's argument, the crtc concluded that except for voice mail and the routing of calls, all other call-net services were not enhanced but basic services (telecom decision crtc 87-5). accordingly, the crtc directed both bell and cncp to stop supplying call-net with their mts/wats facilities. call-net responded by having decision 87-5 reviewed. in telecom decision crtc 87-14 call-net claimed that the crtc had made a number of errors. the crtc's investigation of its decision found that no errors had been made. call-net applied directly to the 40 rideout/teucommunication policy government and through an order-in-council the government permitted call-net to extend its access to bell and cncp for almost one year. the order-in-council overruled the crtc decision, giving callnet time to restructure its business operations to conform with the commission's ruling in decision 87-5. in 1988 (telecom decision crtc 88-11) call-net reapplied to the crtc to examine its new enhanced services, cdar. the commission ruled that except for incoming call identification and voice recording storage and retrieval, all other cdar services were basic and not enhanced services. moreover, call-net's wide area telephone services (wats) did not meet the definition for enhanced services (telecom decisions crtc 84-18; 87-2, 5; 88-11). these events were repeated as call-net tried to organize its customers into sharing groups so that private lines could be used jointly. the crtc considered this reorganization an illegal way to re-sell enhanced sendees (telecom letter decision 88-9). however, a second order-in-council extended call-net's cut-off from bell and cncp. these disputes were resolved when the crtc relaxed its rules governing the resale and sharing of private network services (telecom decision crtc 90-3). until telecom decision crtc 85-19, federally regulated carriers were prohibited from re-selling and sharing their services, except via a special agreement approved by the crtc. 9 the crtc concluded that resale and sharing would benefit through more competition. nonregulated suppliers would not be regulated. the rational offered by the commission was that the new competitors would rely on competitive pricing. in other words, the environment would be governed by market forces rather than government regulation. meanwhile, the resale and sharing services offered by bell and bc tel would continue to be regulated. the subordinate class: telecommunication trade unions: in a commissioned study (mosco and zureik, 1987), the communication, energy and paper workers union of canada (cep), formerly the communication and electrical workers of canada (cewc), note that technological modernization in the telecommunication industry leads to job losses, deskilling, the computerized monitoring of work performance, and increases in part-time and contract work. aside from these issues, the cep has also been active in sharing information with the canada 41 alternate routes. i olume 10. 199j public on the effects of deregulation and long distance competition. part of their campaign in 1985 to defeat cncp's bid to compete in long distance services involved the distribution of petitions and pamphlets, the creation of toll free phone information, and the launching of a national media campaign. along with the telecommunication workers union (twu) and other civil society organizations, the cep was successful in preventing cncp from competing in long distance services (telecom decision crtc 85-19). more recently, the cep has spoken out against similar applications filed by unitel and bcrl (cewc, 1989). the cep supports a single regulated monopoly network, arguing that the creation of more long distance networks would involve an expensive capital outlay that would result in substantial telephone rate increases. the cep also supports a single future broadband network. the cep favours a single network because it would help create and protect jobs. it is also felt that it would be easier to set policy over one network. ironically, this leaves the cep in a contradictory position, supporting similar policies to those of bell. the telecommunication workers union (twu), like the cep, has been actively involved in the telecommunication policy process. the twu has made policy recommendations to the department of communications and the crtc (schniad, 1990). they argue that competition in long distance voice and data services would not be in the public interest, but would only benefit the business community. instead, the union supports a state-of-the-art unitary network governed by strict regulatory requirements. civil society groups and organizations: (i) first nations organizations. koebberling (1990:22) notes that as early as 1970 the inuit presented their telecommunication needs to the department of communications. the inuit tapirisat of canada (itc) lobbied for reliable and inexpensive interactive services suitable for the harsh conditions of the arctic. often the whole inuit community participated and spoke at hearings (telecom decision crtc 77-16). along with complaints about a system that did not work for up to three or four weeks at a time, the itc expressed concerns with disconnections that resulted because bills were received late or written only in english. service problems were resolved in the late 1970s, but this was followed in the 1980s by fewer specialty services and increased rates. mcnulty (1980:1-15) argues that northern telecommunication expansion 42 rideout/telecommunication policy and control was geared to meet the needs not of the inuit, but particular northern development projects (for example, mining exploration), the major telephone companies, and the federal government. the itc challenged bell's rates at a number of hearings, arguing that remote northern areas should have specialized flat rates and be able to take advantage of the special discount packages offered to southern subscribers. the crtc rejected the itc's recommendation for a 24 hour flat rate (koebberling, 1990:25). however, the inuit are not only interested in the economic advantage of telecommunication services but, more importantly, in the capabilities for education, health and transportation as well as social and cultural applications. (ii) disabled people's groups. the canadian hearing society and the canadian coordinating council on deafness have participated in a number of crtc hearings on rate rebalancing, resale and sharing, and interconnection. both organizations urged the crtc to introduce technical standards to ensure that all telephones are compatible with a hearing aid device called a telecoil can. bc tel, the canadian manufacturers association and the canadian business manufacturers association argued that it would cost too much ($10 per telephone) to convert single line phones. the crtc ruled that canada is committed to disabled groups and that telephone devices for the hearing impaired should be as low as possible. nonetheless, the crtc did not change the standards rule for hearing aid compatibilitv (telecom decision crtc 8214). it was only after further standards hearings and additional participation by other disabled organizations such as the advocacy resource centre for the handicapped and the british columbia old age pensioners organization, that the crtc approved the changes for telephone sets for federally regulated carriers in 1987 (telecom decision crtc 87-1). (iii) anti poverty groups and public interest advocacy organizations. the national anti-poverty organization (napo) has and continues to participate in the telecommunication policy process. napo was an active participant in the liberalization of terminal attachment hearing and in cncp's long distance bid in 1985. permitting competition in telecommunication services, according to napo, benefits business users and the new telecommunication providers at the expense of ordinary canadian telephone subscribers. the public interest advocacy centre (pia), a non-public law 43 alternate routes. x olume 10, 1993 organization, represents various civil groups before regulatory tribunals, the courts, and legislative committees. past hearing involvement includes those concerning interim terminal attachment, rate rebalancing (telecom decisions crtc 85-19, 88-4), and the recent hearing on competition in long distance telephone service (crtc telecom public notice 1990-73). pia agreed with the federal provincial territorial task force (1988) that if competition is permitted and long distance rates are reduced, economic supply and demand theory predicts that long distance calling would increase, consequently increasing long distance revenues. hence, pia argues that local rates would not have to increase. pia also notes that bell and bc tel's modernization programs are subsidized by residential subscribers, even though most of the programs only benefit the business subscribers (todd, 1990:iii-iv). (iv) senior citizen groups and coalitions. various senior citizen coalitions, such as the british columbia old age pensioners' organization (bcoap) have taken part in a number of hearings. bcoap's position in rate rebalancing and long distance competition is that if local phone rates increase, numerous seniors on fixed incomes would be adversely affected. seniors consider telephone services to be a necessity for emergency and social use. such groups hold the view that it is the telephone system's social aspect which increases its service value to all subscribers. if competition is permitted in long distance service and local rates go up, a number of subscribers would drop off the system. it is interesting to note that in 1985 (telecom decision crtc 8519) bell estimated that 160,000 subscribers, or 400,000 individuals, would drop of the system if rates were rebalanced. similarly, bc tel forecasted that 30,000 of its subscribers would have to leave the network and 70 percent of its population would pay higher prices. in the recent long distance competition hearing bell, bc tel, unitel and bcrl as well as the large telecommunication user groups all supported 'targeted subsidies' to alleviate the drop-off of subscribers. targeted subsidies, however, is simply another name for telephone welfare programs. mosco (1991:4), in evidence presented before the crtc on long distance competition, emphasizes that there are important lessons to be learned from the american experience with telephone welfare programs: by 1990, 49 states, the district of columbia, and the federal government operated a wide range of programs to subsidize the cost of telephone installation. 44 rideout/telecommunicat'wn policy admittedly the names of these programs avoid identification with traditional social assistance. link-up america, which subsidizes installation, and lifeline, which provides service discounts have replaced earlier reference to phone stamps. included in these programs are not only federal subsidies, but state run programs each with varying criteria for welfare eligibility, including income verification tests that are often administered by the phone companies. moreover, the welfare programs have failed to reach the majority of the eligible subscribers. 10 (v) consumers association of canada. the only organization which claims to represent all canadian residential telephone subscribers, the consumers association of canada (cac), occupies a shifting ideological position which is increasingly difficult to identify. in numerous hearings, the cac supported competition on behalf of business users (see the terminal attachment decisions 80-13, 82-14, and enhanced services decision 84-10, etc.), but often ignored the interests of residential subscribers. the cac's (1991) evidence in the 1990-91 long distance competition hearings recommends that the consumer price index would be a good measure of affordability if applied to telephone bills. according to the cac, residential subscribers can afford to pay more for their services. 11 further, the cac (1991:24) emphasizes the importance of developing economic and technical criteria for meeting the needs of medium and small business. what is noteworthy about the cac is that their position is unlike that presented by american consumer organizations during at&t hearings; the cac has virtually abandoned the non-business subscriber. this position is a good example of how a group within the subordinate class can become fractionalized and serve the interest of the power bloc. conclusion telecommunication services have been and continue to be created to meet the demands of large users and the business sector. the crtc has contributed to the process by permitting more competition and liberalizing telecommunication policy. this shift has meant that many business services are no longer placed under public supervision or regulation. 45 alternate routes. volume 10. 199 i conversely, the submissions offered by unions, anti-poverty organizations, the hearing impaired, seniors organizations, and native peoples reveal that recent policy shifts come at the expense of public interest and universality. in canada, the concept of universality is increasingly approached from an economic and/or technical point of viewby the telecommunication industry and the crtc. universal service simply means the ability to reach more consumers. however, as garnham (1989:125) explains, this approach is limiting because it regards telecommunication service solely as an economic good to be consumed like any other commodity. hence, the distribution of telecommunication welfare becomes an important policy consideration for suppliers, the state, unions and various civil society groups and organizations. policy objectives are translated into reasonable costs (affordability) for consumers, ignoring the vital issue of the needs of citizens. targeted subsidies' are also part of the current discourse of telecommunication policy liberalization. this discourse is an attempt to camouflage the effects of telecommunication competition on low and fixed income subscribers, but it does not address subscribers who value telephony for its social/cultural usefulness. the shift away from public service also increases the problems of regional disparity, the differences between northern and southern, urban and rural subscribers. until the late 1940s telephone service in canada discriminated against many canadians on a class basis. service was considered to be a business tool or a luxury (mosco and pike, 1986). the evidence presented in this analysis suggests that a shift to liberal policies is eroding the social principles associated with public policy, generating a two tiered system; one for basic services and one for privileged and business users. in the process, the telephone could be transformed back into the luxury item it was fifty years ago. an alternative to a two tiered telecommunication system is a telecommunication environment influenced and guided by social regulation. mosco (1990c:30-32) offers important suggestions for social regulation, breaking it into short term and long term goals and objectives. in the short run, a commitment to universality requires a stronger focus on the social regulation of the telecommunication industry. this would mean stronger regulation of accounting, pricing and investment practices of all the carriers, including the telecommunication canada consortium. unitcl. bc rail/lightel. and call-net. stronger social regulation also means that issues with significant social implications must receive 46 rideoiu/telecommunic&ion policy heightened attention. this includes informing and educating the public about the social, cultural, and economic implications of new services. in the long term, it is necessary to examine the values, network types, forms of governance, and pricing mechanisms that can frame another vision of a transformed telecommunication system. what this means is that rather than building on a market frame-work, as workers and citizens we need to determine the real communication and information needs of people. we need to begin with a broader commitment to universality; one which includes the fundamental right of access to the production, distribution and use of information services in general. further, the fundamental right to universal access to telecommunication networks needs to include a wide range of voice, information, and signalling services. longer range values involve developing a strong and democratic policy process which defines issues for the policy agenda by soliciting and organizing public participation in policy decision making and implementation. postscript since this research was conducted, significant developments have occurred which warrant further comment. in 1992, the crtc permitted competition in long distance services, breaking up the monopoly held by bell canada and bc tel. although new long distance telephone service suppliers such as unitel and bc rail/lightel will be able to compete with telecommunication canada members, the process is far from over and the telecommunication arena continues to change. bell canada has unsuccessfully contested the crtc ruling. more recently, bell has applied to the crtc to increase its residential and business local rates. these rate increases range from 10 to 65 per cent. bell maintains these increases are necessary so that it can now compete effectively in canadian telecommunications. call-net, a partner with bc rail/lightel, is in the process of acquiring other telecommunication companies as it strengthens its position through consolidation to compete in the public long distance market. similarly, significant changes are occurring at unitel which recently sold a 20 per cent share of its corporation to at&t. this is the first step in breaking a hundred-year tradition in which decision-making and control of the telecommunications industry was overseen by the canadian public. 47 alternate routes, volume 10, 1993 notes 1. babe (1990:90) explains that in 1880 bell telephone company of canada was given a charter to incorporate a national company. the charter was a de facto monopoly for early telecommunicationmunications. bell's charter permitted the company to manufacture and develop a telephone system with a guarantee from the federal government that there would be no interference from other competitors. from 1880 until 1906 bell's "monopolistic price gouging, over predatory business practices, and over service deprivation in rural areas" (babe, 1990:90) led to a public outcry. numerous petitions were sent to the government demanding that the company be nationalized. the federal government responded to public pressure by subjecting bell to a very loose form of regulation in 1906 by a state agency known as the board of railway commissioners for canada. their mandate was extremely vague, dealing only with the issue of rates; their only criteria was that rates be just, reasonable and applied to all people at the same rate. in 1976 federal telecommunication regulation was assigned to the canadian radio-television and telecommunication commission. 2. cncp is the monopoly producer of telegraph services such as teletex and telex. the organization also provides a wide range of private telephone services. more recently cncp offers private line voice, video, facsimile and data services. it is also the exclusive supplier of canada's broad band data services (datapro, 1989). 3. private branch exchanges (pbx) are terminal and switching devices. when located on the customer's premises, they are called terminals but when they are provided by a telephone company on its premises, they are refereed to as centrex exchanges (babe, 1990:28). 4. the term by-pass' refers to the capability of the new communication technology and the new telecommunication networks to redirect (by computer or networks) telecommunication traffic to other networks. 48 rideout/telecommunication policy 5. until the supreme court decision of august 14, 1989, telecommunication regulation and policy was split between federal, provincial and a few municipal governments. the federal regulator, the crtc, regulated the private telecommunication providers, bell canada and bc tel. provincial governments were responsible for regulating the public telecommunication sector. a few municipalities such as edmonton own, operate and regulate their own telecommunication systems. 6. as part of this research project a written request was made to the ccc for a list of its members. gloria schpales, mr. richardson's executive assistant, informed this researcher on july 13, 1990 that the ccc was "unable to send a list of its members." 7. in canada, the canadian institute of chartered accounts (cica), the national body of chartered accounts, is responsible for accounting and auditing standards. its recommendations are used by public accountants, small businesses, commerce and industry, governments, finance, etc., are published in the cica handbook (smith et. al., 1978). the accounting profession, business and the state accept the legality and legitimacy of these practices. the critique of accounting methods and practices offered in this paper is an attempt to show that within a class analysis accounting practices are not neutral. it is common practice, for example, for trade unions, when negotiating collective agreements with business, to scrutinize the audited annual corporate reports for various legal ways to defer taxation through depreciation, reserved funds, shareholder's equity, contingency funds, etc. 8. cncp's application proposed that it would obtain a market share of mts/wats service of approximately eight per cent over 10 years, make contribution payments equal to 1 1.5 cents per minute, and offer prices 20 to 30 per cent below the existing telephone rates. the crtc noted that in order to make cncp's mts/wats services profitable, a large discount would be required from bell and bc tel. the commission was concerned that requesting such a discount would result in higher local rates (telecom decision crtc 85-19 and interrogatory cncp (crtc) 05 october 84-1302). 49 alternate routes, volume 10, 1993 10. as of 1990 in the united states only 3.06 percent of eligible link-up subscribers have enroled in the program and 31.8 per cent of life-line eligible subscribers have signed up in 48 states (mosco, 1991:4). 11. after applying the consumer price index to telephone bills from 1986 to 1990, the cac argues that bills have declined by 7.9 per cent, whereas other residential bills increased by 16.0 per cent. references babe, robert. (1990) telecommunications in canada: technology, industry and government. toronto: university of toronto press. bell canada. (1990) evidence of bell canada. crtc telecom public notice 1990-73, november. canada. (1990) interrogatories bcrl (bell). 14 sept. 90 100 105 1c2. crtc public hearing re. notice 1990-73. . (1990) resale and sharing ofprivate line services. telecom decision crtc 90-3. ottawa, 1 march. . (1990) unitel communications inc. and b.c. rail telecommunications/lightel inc. applications to provide long distance telephone services and related resale and sharing issues: scope and procedure. crtc public notice 1990-73. ottawa, j august. ^ . (1989) re: call-net telecommunications ltd. application tor an order requiring british columbia telephone company to provide 129 pbx trunks. telecom letter decision crtc 89-17. ottawa, 9 august. _ . (1988)5e// canada and british columbia telephone company'-introduction of between friends and teleplus subscription services'. telecom decision crtc 88-19. ottawa, 10 november. . (1988) federal provincial territorial task force on telecommunication competition in public long distance telephone services in canada. ottawa: supply and services. ( 1 98 8 ) /f ebalancing and r evenue settlem ent issues. telecom decision crtc 88-4. ottawa, 17 march. . (1988) re: call-net telecommunications ltd. v. bell. canada telecom letter decision crtc 88-9, ottawa, 6 september. 50 rideout/telecommunication policy (1988) resale to provide enhanced services. telecom decision crtc 88-11. ottawa, 16 august. __^ . (1988) bell canada and british columbia telephone company: introduction of between friends and teleplus subscription services. telecom decision crtc 88-19. ottawa, 10 novemoer. (1987) interexchange competition and related issues. telecom decision crtc 87-1. ottawa, 12 february. . (1987) bell canada application to deny the resale by call-net 1 elecomm unications ltd. ofservices and facilities provided by bell canada and cncp ' crtc 87-5. ottawa, 22 may. . (1987) call-net telecommunication ltd. application to review and v arv telecom decision crtc 87-5. telecom decision crtc 87-14. ottawa, 23 september. (1987) cellular radio adequacv of structural safeguards. telecom decision crtc 87-13. ottawa, 23 september. _^ (1987) tariff revisions related to resale and sharing. telecom decision crtc 87-2. ottawa, 12 february. (1985) interexchange competition and related issues. telecom decision crtc 85-19. ottawa, 29 august. . (1985) enhanced services. telecom decision crtc 85-1/. ottawa, 12 july. . (1984) enhanced services. telecom decision crtc 84-18. ottawa, 12 july. . (1984) interrogatories bcrl (bell). 5 oct. 84 1302. . (1984) northwestel inc. implementation of decision perm itting attachment of subscriber-provided terminal equipment. telecom decision crtc 84-12. ottawa, 24 april. . (1984j bell canada and british columbia telephone company^ implementation of decision permitting attachment of subscriber-provided terminal equipment. telecom decision crtc 84-11. ottawa, 30 march. . (1984) cellular radio service. telecom decision crtc 84-29. ottawa, 19 december. . (1984) implementation of decision permitting 51 alternate routes, volume 10. 1993 a ttachment ofsubscriber-provided telex and twx terminal equipment. telecom decision crtc 84-14. ottawa, 27 april. . (1984) radio common carrier interconnection with federally regulated telephone companies. telecom decision crtc 84-10. "ottawa, 22 march. . (1984) terra nova telecommunications incimplementation of decision permitting a ttachment of subscriber-provided terminal equipment. telecom decision 84-13. ottawa, 24 april, nected . (1983) cncp telecommunications: rates for the provision of interconprivate line voice service. telecom decision crtc 83-10. ottawa, 26 july. (1982)^4 ttachm ent ofsubscriber-provided term inal equipment. telecom decision crtc 82-14. ottawa, 23 november. __^_^__, (1981) bell canada interim requirements regarding the a ttachment of subscriber-provided terminal equipment. telecom decision crtc 81-14. ottawa, 29 july. . (1981) british columbia telephone company interim terms ana conditions regarding the attachment' of subscriber-provided terminal equipment. telecom decision crtc 81-19. ottawa, 22 october. ( 198 1) cncp telecomm unications: interconnection with the british columbia telephone company. telecom decision crtc 81-24. ottawa, 24 november. . (1981) subscriber provided terminal equipment interim technical standards. telecom decision crtc 81-23. ottawa, 16 november. . (1981) terminal attachment proceeding pre-hearing conjerence. telecom decision crtc 81-21. ottawa, 2 november. . (1980) bell canada interim requirements regarding the a ttachment of subscriber-provided terminal equipment. telecom decision crtc 80-13. ottawa, 5 august. 52 rideouttelecommunication policy . (1980) bell canada interim requirements regarding the a ttachment of subscriber provided terminal equipment. telecom decision crtc 80-13. ottawa, 5 august. . (1979) cncp telecommunications-interconnection with bell canada. telecom decision crtc 79-11. ottawa, 17 may. _^^ (1977) challenge communications ltd. v. bell canada telecom decision crtc 77-16. ottawa, 23 december. canadian business telecommunication alliance. (1989) "the cbta looks at long distance competition in canada.' in donald cruikshank (ed.) the long distance competition debate. toronto: donald j. cruiksnank, associates inc.; 12-15. canadians for competitive telecommunications. (1986) the crisis for canadian business telecommunications rates ana the public interest. february, 1-27. carnoy, martin. (1984) the state and political theory. princeton, nj: princeton university press. communications and electrical workers of canada. (1989) "local distribution telecommunication networks." comments by cwc to department of communications of canada notice no. dgtp-09-89. consumers association of canada. (1991) "residential telephony." evidence of consumers association of canada submitted to crtc telecommunication public notice 1990-73. april. datapro. (1989) it10-050 (301-12) "canada the commercial and regulatory environment: regional overview." deirn, nj: datapro research group; october. garnham, nicholas. (1989) "universal service in european telecommunications." in n. garnham and a. aksoy (ed.), european telecommunications policy research. amsterdam: ios; 123-174. hills, jill. (1989) "universal service: liberalization and privatization of telecommunications." telecommunications policv. june, 129-144. huber, peter. (1987) the geodesic network. washington, dc : u.s. department of justice. information technology association of canada. (1989) telecommunications regulation in canada: a patchwork of policies. itac, may. 53 alternate routes, volume 10. 1993 janisch, h.n. (1986) "winners and losers: the challenges facing telecommunications regulation." in w.t. stanbury (ed.), telecommunications policy and regulation: the impact of competition and technological change. montreal: the institute for research on public policy, 307-400. jessop, bob. (1991) "the legacy of poulantzas." studies in political economy. 34 (spring): 75-107. koebberling, uschi. (1990) "extending telephone to canada's north: experiences with service availability, quality and rates." canadian journal of communication. 15 (2): 216-32. langille, david. (1987) "the business council on national issues and the canadian state. ' studies in political economy. 24: autumn. mahon, rianne. (1984) the politics of industrial restructuring: canadian textiles. toronto: university of toronto press. ___^ . (1980) "regulatory agencies: captive agents or hegemonic apparatuses." in j. paul grayson (ed.), class state ideology and change. toronto: holt, rienhart and change. mcnulty, jean. (1988) " the political economy of canadian satellite broadcasting." canadian journal of communication. 13(2), spring, 1-15. mcphail, thomas and brenda mcphail. (1988) telecommunication 2001: a strategic forecast. toronto: kagan and woo. melody, william h. (1981) report to the canadian radio-television and telecommunication commission cost inquiry, phase hi. ottawa: ministry of supply and services, july 16. mosco, vincent. (1991) "canadian radio-television and telecommunications commission crtc telecommunication public notice 1991-73. evidence on behalf of the communications and electrical workers of canada." march. . (1990a) "toward a transnational world information order: the canada-us. free trade agreement." the canadian journal of communication. (15) 2. may; 46-63. (1990b) "transforming telecommunications: political economy and public policy" paper presented for the conference on canadian political economy in the era of free trade, carleton university. 54 rideout/teucommunication policy ~-~. (1990c) "transforming telecommunications in canada". ottawa: canadian centre for policy alternatives. . (1982) pushbutton fantasies: critical perspectives on videotex and injormation technology. norwood, new jersey: ablex publishing. mosco, vincent and elia zureik. (1988) "deregulating telecommunications: the workers view". telecommunication policy. september. mosco, vincent and robert pike. (1986) "canadian consumers and threats to universal telephone service' . telecommunication policy. march. offe, claus. (1984) "social policy and the theory of the state". in contradictions of the welfare state. cambridge, mass: mit. offe, claus and volker range. (1982) "theses on the theory of the state". in a. giddens and d. hold (ed.) classes, power, "and conflict. berkeley: university of california press. poulantzas,nicos. (1978) state, power, socialism. london: newleft books. . (1973) "on special classes". new left review. 78, 27-5^ oettinger, anthony g. (1988) the formulais everything: costing and pricing in the telecommunications industry. cambridge, ma.: harvard university program on information resources policy. roman, andrew j. (1990) "the telecommunications policy void in canada". canadian journal of communication. 15 (2): 96-110. schniad, syd. (1990) "a national strategy for the information age: the telecommunications workers union "response to doc". submission notice #dgtp-09-89. local distribution telecommunications network. the telecommunication workers of british columbia, may. smith jay, skousen, k. fred, and parker, john r. e. (1978) intermediate accounting: canadian edition. toronto: gage publishing. stanbury. w.t. (1986) "decision making in telecommunications: the interplay of* distributional and efficiency considerations", (ed.) telecommunications policv and regulations. montreal: the institute for research on public policv, 481-509. 55 alternate routes, volume 10, 1993 surtees, lawrence. (1990) "megalink discounts for medium and large business" globe and mail. december 3: b4. taylor, allan. (1989) "the new national dream: a telecommunications policy for the 21st century." ceo of royal bank of canada. a speech presented to the canadian club of toronto. tinker, tony, leham, cheryl and neimark, marilyn. (1988) "bookkeeping for capitalism: the mystery of accounting for unequal exchange . in mosco and wasko (ed.)' the political economy of information. madison, wisconsin: university of wisconsin press; 188-216. todd. john. (1990) "paying for what you need: technological advances and competition in telecommunications. " paper prepared for the public interest advocacy centre; june. woodrow. r. brian and woodside, kenneth b. (1986) "players, stakes and politics in the future of telecommunications regulation in canada". in stanburv (ed.) telecommunications policy and regulation. montreal: the institute for research on public policy; 101-288. 56 rural manufacture in lower canada: understanding seigneurial privilege and the transition in the countryside * david schulze the paper is a discussion of the theoretical implications of capitalist production based on seigneurial privilege in late eighteenth and early nineteenth century quebec. this phenomenon is evaluated in the context of the marxist analysis of the transition to capitalism. while earlier interpretations have characterized such production as essentially mercantile and/or feudalistic, the author considers that it matches marx's description of the transitional phenomenon of manufacture , the form of capital's first appearance. l'article est une discussion des implications theoriques de la production capitaliste basee sur le privilege seigneurial au quebec, a la fin du dix-huitieme et au debut du dix-neuvieme siscles. ce phenomene est apparent dans le contexte de l'analyse marxiste de la transition au capitalisme. tandis que les interpretations anterieures ont traite cette production d'essentiellement marchande et/ou feodaliste, elle se range a la description par marx du phenomene de transition qui est la manufacture , la forme de la premiere apparition du capital. theory: the transition the nineteenth century saw the emergence of industrial capitalism in quebec (lower canada); that much is acknowledged by any historian of the period. this implied a transition from a predominantly rural society specializing in agricultural production to a predominantly urban one, characterized by industrial production. marxist analyses offer a clear and precise characterization of this transition, seeing it as a change in the mode of production; that is, in the social existence of labour. the change was from a primarily agrarian society of petty producers, whose surplus "whether in direct labour or in rent in kind or in money, is transferred under coercive sanction" to "a society producing commodities for exchange in the market, whose principal classes were capital owning entrepreneurs and propertyless wage-earners," the surplus of the latter being appropriated by the former through the sale of labour-pcwer as a commodity. * the historical context within the marxist school, no fully satisfying work of synthesis has been published which enables us to place early nineteenth century lower canada in context. tom naylor's thesis is that "anglo-canadian merchants, factors and representatives of british joint-stock mercantile companies, in collaboration with a franco-canadian landed class, intermediated flows of primary staples from the u.s. [sic] to britain along the st. lawrence route. "^ stanley ryerson suggested that capitalist industry developed along three paths: first, via the timber trade; secondly, manufactories and machine shops as a more direct outgrowth of the industrial revolution in england and, thirdly, a rural french canadian industrial capitalism. capitalist development was then blocked by land monopolies and seigneurial tenure which impedea settlement, 135 the spread of communications, and the growth of a home market, as well as by the imperial trade favoured by the english canadian merchant-landowners. •* these analyses strike me as being at once too pessimistic and too simplistic, for reasons which will be made clearer below. i suggest that lower canada is not usefully thought of as belonging to ernest mandel's category of "less developed countries" in the period of freely competitive capitalism (for him, roughly from the beginning of the industrial revolution to 1860). i quote at length: the concrete articulation between these countries, which were at that time capitalist 'developing nations', and the capitalist world market was two-fold. on the one hand, the import of cheap machine goods from abroad with the accompanying "artillery of cheap prices' was the great destroyer of traditional domestic production. [ . . . ] but . . . local machine industry was able to take the place of local domestic industry in about ten years, i.e., the foreign products simply cleared the ground for the development of "national' capitalism. on the other hand, the rapid specialization in their foreign trade was able to secure important sectors of the world market as outlets for these rising capitalist economies. the profits thus realized became, in their turn, the main source for the local accumulation of capital. it is also true, of course, that integration into the world market and conditions of relative underdevelopment in this phase had very negative effects on primitive accumulation of capital in these countries. the exchange of commodities produced in conditions of a lower productivity of labour was an unequal one: it was an exchange of less against more labour, which inevitably led to a drain, an outward flow of value and capital from these countries to the advantage of western europe. the presence of large reserves of cheap labour and land in these countries logically resulted in a capital accumulation with a lower organic composition of capital than in the first industrialized countries. but the extent of this drain and of this lower organic composition were not sufficient to pose a serious threat to the indigenous and independent accumulation of capital — at least not in those countries where social and political class forces were already capable of replacing the destruction of an artisanate by the development of national large-scale industry. the most important point, with reference to quebec's economy is that it was decidedly not "underdeveloped" (as in much of latin america, for instance), nor was its development chiefly "mercantile," in the sense of being 136 predominantly oriented toward circulation as such rather than (capitalist) production. for instance, it is true that production in this period was affected by increased british demand for canadian wheat and timber, created by napoleon's continental blockade which greatly affected lower canada's development, but the growth of the population (estimated at 65,000 in 1765 and over 1,000,000 one hundred years later^) also had an effect since production was for both an export and a domestic market. crucial to an understanding of pre-industrial quebec is the fact that the major part of the land occupied by european petty producers was not owned "free-hold," but, in the words of lord durham, had "feudal burthens" attached to it.° land, the principal means of production, was held under seigneurial tenure and the privileges of the seigneurs included the right of concession, the right to an annual rent ("cens et rentes"), the right to one-twelfth of the price of sale or exchange of land, the "droit de banalite" (the seigneurs provided a mill which their censitaires were obliged to use at the price of one-fourteenth of their grain) as well as having rights over hunting and fishing. in addition, certain privileges were attached, depending upon the contracts between the seigneur and the first censitaire: "corvee" (obligatory labour), the right to retain concessions which changed hands through the reimbursement of the buyer, and the "servitudes," including the censitaires' obligation to maintain the roads and the right of the seigneur to take or reserve wood, stone, minerals, or land for the construction and placement of churches, manors, farms, mills or public works, as well as the right to forbid the construction of mills or manufactures by others, subject to his conditions.' 137 louise dech'ene has described the seigneuries of new france not as a "cadre de production," but a "systeme fiscal, cree pour des structures economiques et sociales quasi-immobiles, qui a survecu a l'extension du marche."° seigneurial tenure was ended in 1854 through a reimbursement of the seigneurs for these privileges by the government and the censitaires, and the conversion of the rights over unconceded land to outright property. there has been considerable debate on the state of agricultural production in early nineteenth century lower canada which i cannot adequately survey here. generally speaking, i adopt the analysis presented by serge courville: that that was no crisis in agricultural production, though the habitant reoriented his production to better meet the changing demands of the market: en 1844, cette transformation est completee, l'agriculture etant tout a fait integr§e dans l'espace. ce qui laisse croire que les malaises enregistres par les chroniqueurs temoignent plus d'une crise du monde rural que d'une crise agricole comme telle, mettant ainsi en cause davantage les conditions dans lesquelles evolue l'agriculture que les techniques de production de l'habitant . . . * using 1831 census data, courville was able to make the nature of this "malaise" quite clear: "d'un rang a l'autre, d'une paroisse a l'autre, les taux [de cens et rentes] varient du simple au double ou au triple, parfois plus, pour atteindre sur les fronts pionniers des seuils sans precedents, lies "a l'augmentation des tarifs en numeraire et an produits a l'insertion, dans les contrats de concession, de servitudes et de reserves nouvelles (sur le bois notamment) qui grevent d'autant les conditions de detention des censives. " '^ in their frequent petitions to the house of assembly, the censitaires themselves eloquently described the general state of the administration of the seigneuries in the early nineteenth century: "that the petitioners [the 138 freeholders of the parish of st. nicholas] complain of the seigniorial rents which have been raised to three or four times what they originally were, and which may be, as in fact they daily are, raised still higher; [...] of numerous unjust and vexatious reserves, the principal of which are, the reserve of all the timber fit for the saw mill or the lumber market... "** most important, in the context of the population increase mentioned earlier, were the difficulties in acquiring land. a group of "divers censitaires possessors of land en roture in this province" in 1825 observed that "vast quantities of these lands [i.e., "of this province"] are at this day lying in a state of nature" due to "an unwillingness on the part of the present proprietors to concede these lands, being willing to avail themselves of the present rapid increase in the value of landed property in order to be enabled to exact hereafter more lucrative rents and duties, thereby perverting royal munificence into a land speculation."^ the problem: theoretical considerations this essay's real starting point is barthelemy boliette, the seigneur of lavaltrie from 1822 until his death in 1850, whose biography was published in 1972 in the revue d'histoire de l'amerique francaise by jean-claude robert. 1 -^ joliette was a notary who, in 1822, inherited a quarter of the seigneury of lavaltrie through his wife. his uncle, mill-owner and notary at l'assomption with whom joliette had apprenticed, had administered the seigneury for ten years previously. joliette administered the seigneury for his brother-in-law and his sister-in-law's husband, the co-inheritors. within the first two years of his administration, the majority of arrears on the part of the censitaires were paid off by them, partly in the form of labour and wood. joliette then established the village d'industrie by 139 building a complex of saw mills at a cost of 128,467 livres on one of the two seigneurial domains (which also provided much of the wood at first). by 1842, these mills employed approximately thirty people. he obtained the wood from his own seigneury (in part through the "droit de retrait"), from property in the neighbouring township of kildare and by buying the rights to wood on neighbouring seigneuries, apparently running the lumber shanties himself. later on, he built a distillery which he sold to an associate and which burned to the ground shortly afterwards. he also made plans for glass manufacturing, but these were never carried out. at the end of his life, he had a twelve-mile railroad built to expedite the shipment of wood from joliette to quebec city (financed, in part, by shares sold to his censitaires ; . 14 robert's article has not gone unnoticed in the literature, but the commentaries which are available have not solved, to my satisfaction, the problem of how to understand the economic activity of a man who was a "capital owning entrepreneur" employing "propertyless wage-earners" — with funds and resources accumulated through a form of coercive sanction, however modified. robert himself chose to analyze a canadian seigneur and the village he founded using the concepts of urbanization and the entrepreneur. the concept of a transition between modes of production, characterized by different means of appropriating surplus (and, by implication, the dynamic of class conflict) are absent from his study. fernand ouellet, historian of early nineteenth century quebec, saw seigneurs like joliette as "int§ressants dans la perspective de la mise en place du conflit entre capitalisme et propriete seigneuriale" but concludes that it is chiefly anglophone bourgeois seigneurs who thus put the seigneurial system in question, while among the bourgeois francophones "la primaute va d6cid6ment dans l'ensemble aux considerations sociales. " '-> 140 joliette received considerable attention from gerald bernier and daniel salee, two political scientists attempting a neo-marxist analysis of the economy of lower canada, whose over-all analysis is similar to naylor's and which cites his work. they define lower canada as an "§conomie marchande" whose essential characteristics are: a "hypertrophic" in circulation at the expense of production, the dominance of capital accumulated and recycled through exchange ("capital marchand"), the exploitation of land for speculative purposes and/or mercantilist ones (i.e., the categories of goods produced are determined by external demand), and the enlarged reproduction of dominant, non-capitalist relations of production. "forme de production insolite s'il en est, elle revet certaines allures capitalistes, mais procede d'une logique fondamentalement feodaliste." the manufacturing potential of lower canada was largely ignored by the "bourgeoisie marchande" and the expansion of capitalist relations of production finally came through a gradual passage from artisanal production to manufacturing. ^ in a manner not unlike ouellet, who mentions joliette only to put him aside since he has already decided that for francophone bourgeois seigneurs "l'attrait des valeurs nobiliaires" is prime, bernier and salee decide his activities are not genuinely capitalist: dans le cadre d'une economie a dominante marchande, la capitalisation de la rente fonciere est essentiellement tributaire des imperatifs du capital marchand; tant que persiste, a tout le moins, le caractere mercantiliste dominant des fonctions economiques. la construction de canaux ou l'erection de moulins a scie sont d'abord motivses par la nature des activitss commerciales en cours dans la colonie. elles sont directement fonction des echanges avec la metropole; d'une part, les nouveaux canaux dans beauharnois sont essentiels a l'amelioration des echanges marchands, et , d'autre part, le developpement de l'industrie du bois dans lavaltrie est completement dependant de la demande britannique pour ce produit . *' this is further supported with the following: 141 ainsi done, bien que les initiatives economiques de certains seigneurs puissent revstir une apparence typiquement capitaliste, elles s 'accomplissent en realite non pas sur la base d'extorsion de plus value, ce qui est le propre du capitalisme, mais sur la base de corvees obligatoires , du travail gratuit en remboursement de dettes et de rapports de soumission/exploitation de nature essentiellement feodaliste. ^ the assertion that the labour for the seigneurs' seemingly capitalist activity was provided by corvee and as repayment of debts is simply untrue. joliette did receive some of the arrears due to him in the form of labour, 1' just as at least one other seigneur, joseph drapeau at la baie-du-ha!ha! , built his moulin banal (but never anything else) with corvee labour in 1844-45.20 however, neither arrears nor, especially, corvee, could have guaranteed enough labour for undertakings like joliette's, nor was it necessary, given that the population was increasing while land for settlement became more inaccessible. as the cure wrote of the village d'industrie's first inhabitants: gens inconnus qui viennent deja assaillir nos portes le sac au dos. [...] ces gens sans le sou s 'etablissent dans le voisinage du moulin. . . ** it could, perhaps, more reasonably be objected that the work-force of many of the capitalist seigneurs' enterprises may sometimes have been part-time farmers and thus not yet a proletariat in the sense of subsisting only through the sale of its labour-power, though not for joliette it appears. much more important, however, is bernier and salee's insistence that production responding to demand in the metropole, conditioned by exchange, is not genuinely capitalist, but merely another incarnation of merchant capital. this results from a fundamental misconception of the nature of merchant capital, shared by authors such as naylor. to cite marx: "...merchant's capital is penned in the sphere of circulation ... its function consists exclusively of promoting the exchange of commodities"" 142 (emphasis added). joliette's activity in large part was in fact intimately connected to production: his mills, for instance, match marx's formula for capital, "in which living labour stands in the relation of non-property to raw material, instrument and the means of subsistence required during the period of production."" for bernier and salee, the introduction of new, capitalist relations of production seems to be only directly attributable to a gradual passage from "artisanat" to manufacture.^ this suggests a misunderstanding of marx's description of the two forms of transition to capitalism: first , the merchant becomes an industrial capitalist. this is true in crafts based on trade . . . second , the merchant turns the small masters into his middlemen, or buys directly from the independent producer, leaving him nominally independent and his mode of production unchanged. third , the industrialist becomes merchant and produces directly for the whole market." 26 marx calls the last way "the really revolutionising path," in which "the producer becomes merchant and capitalist, in contrast to the natural agricultural economy and guild-bound handicrafts," but he does not put in doubt the extent to which the first path (merchant capital taking over industrial production) fully constitutes industrial capitalism. moreover, he recognizes the connection to circulation as crucial to that transformation, not somehow non-capitalist. perhaps the example of barthelemy joliette does not make this theoretical point sufficiently clear. a better example would be simon mctavish, fur trader and seigneur of terrebonne from 1802 until his death in 1804 after which the executors of his will administered the seigneury until it was sold to joseph masson in 1832. the fur trade was indeed merchant capital, with only an incidental use of wage-labour relative to over-all activity; namely, the exchange of commodities between two different modes of production. a 143 portion of mctavish's merchant capital became industrial capital at terrebonne, from where voyageurs departed for the interior and had to be supplied with provisions: [mctavish] ran a store and two very modern flour mills, built a bakery that made biscuit for the northwest, set up a sawmill and encouraged the manufacture of barrels. he was not content just to collect the seigneurial rents but tried to channel the region's surplus production to his mills. the wheat he processed was intended for the local market and for export. " it seems that, as with joliette's developments, those of mctavish attracted a pool of labourers, giving birth to the village of terrebonne . 2° in this form, then, merchant capital had invested in industrial capitalist production, albeit in a subsidiary function, having provided a market through trade. it should be noted that the technology most important in the capitalist production discussed here, the mill, was itself in the midst of a transition. "merchant milling" for commercial purposes, using a technology that increasingly required a small labour force, was displacing the "custom milling" for local use (often merely the farmer's personal use) that had been artisanal, needing only a master miller, his journeyman and apprentice. in this sense, then, seigneurs like joliette were also following the non-revolutionary path in terms of a« transition to capitalist milling operations. i7 the activity of capitalist seigneurs does not, however, merely raise the theoretical issue of merchant capital. marx explicitly deals with the type of enterprise in which joliette and mctavish were involved. we quote him here at length because his remarks are so directly relevant: the original historical forms in which capital appears at first sporadically or locally, side by side with the old modes of production, but gradually bursting them asunder, make up manufacture in the proper sense of the word (not yet the factory). this arises, where there is mass-production for export — hence on the basis of large-scale maritime and overland trade , and in the centres of such 144 trade ... manufacture does not initially capture the so-called urban crafts , but the rural subsidiary occupations , spinning and weaving, the sort of work which least requires craft skill, technical training. apart from those great emporia, in which it finds the basis of an export market, and where production is, as it were by its spontaneous nature , directed towards exchange-value — i.e. manufactures directly connected with shipping, including shipbuilding itself, etc. — manufacture first establishes itself not in the cities but in the countryside, in villages lacking gilds, etc. the rural subsidiary occupations contain the broad basis of manufactures, whereas a high degree of progress in production is required in order to carry on the urban crafts as factory industries. such branches of production as glassworks, metal factories, sawmills, etc., which from the start demand a greater concentration of labour-power, utilise more natural power, and demand both mass-production and a concentration of the means of production, etc.: these also lend themselves to manufacture. similarly papermills, etc. [...] for its first prerequisite is the involvement of the entire countryside in the production, not of use values, but of exchange values. glassworks, papermills, ironworks, etc. cannot be conducted on gild principles. they require mass-production, sales to a general market, monetary wealth on the part of the entrepreneur. not that he creates the subjective or objective conditions; but under the old relations of property and production these conditions cannot be brought together. (after this the dissolution of the relations of serfdom and the rise of manufacture gradually transform all branches of production into branches operated by capital.)-^ for marx, rural manufacture is a preliminary form of capital production, appearing in the countryside before the transformation has fully taken place in the town — where it later leads to a concentration of production which subordinates the countryside and enforces rural backwardness.-^ it requires a concentration of labour and of the means of production, needs natural power and mass production, and requires monetary wealth (the latter, by marx's definition, "accumulated through mercantile profits"-"). could there be a more succinct summary of the essential elements of joliette's activity? in fact, it is virtually a list of the potential resources offered by the canadian seigneury. moreover, regarding the role of monetary wealth and the connection between the question of rural manufacture on the one hand, and the question of merchant to industrial capital on the other, it is useful to cite marx on 145 one more point: "[capital's] original formation occurs simply because the historic process of the dissolution of an old mode of production allows value, existing in the form of monetary wealth to buy the objective conditions of labour on one hand, to exchange the living labour of the now free workers for money, on the other." by establishing a strict definition of capitalism which joliette does not match, bernier and salee have missed the point: we are dealing here with an inherently transitional form. the presence of semi-feudal elements is not proof of its non-capitalist nature, but an indication of its position relative to the eventual full development of a capitalist mode of production in quebec. characterizing the phenomenon in discussing capitalist production by seigneurs, most authors have been content to deal with joliette and, occasionally, joseph masson. there has been no real attempt to enumerate the use of seigneurial privilege such as joliette's, nor is there any reason to if one does not view them in terms of control of the means of production — that is, class relations — nor if, like bernier and salee, one regards the phenomenon as somehow illegitimate. 3a unfortunately, the most likely source for a quantitative analysis of the phenomenon, the census, is of only minimal use since, for the three major censuses before commutation (1831, 1842, 1851), neither ownership of mills, nor numbers of employees are listed with any regularity. for at least the 1851 census the printed totals are, in my experience, unreliable, so that the larger picture would have to be reconstructed from a tabulation of the manuscript. moreover, since there is reason to believe that the enumerators 146 35 of the 1851 census missed many of the ontario mills, there is a strong possibility their quebec counterparts did the same, so that even the manuscript would be inaccurate. in all likelihood, a roughly reliable quantitative portrait of this phenomenon could only emerge after exhaustive searches of the notarial, judicial and (remaining) seigneurial records, a project not within the scope of this analysis. in spite of these difficulties, certain aspects of the industrial capitalist use of seigneurial privilege are readily apparent, even after an analysis of only the secondary and printed primary sources. to begin with, the question must be posed not in terms of seigneurs, but of seigneurial privilege, or it becomes a study of biographies rather than of relations of production. when thomas mears and peter mcgill (jr.) ran saw mills and shanties in the seigneury of la petite nation, they rented mills built by the papineaus, paid for the privilege of "coupe de bois" and used a labour force provided by the papineaus' concession of marginal land. by 1851, one of the saw mills employed ten men, the other forty. the former was sold to alanson cook in 1852; but louis-joseph papineau reserved the land and the rights over its use, including the power of the chaudiere falls.-'" their fully capitalist activity took place using the pre-condition of seigneurial privilege, fully exploited by both the papineaus (in terms of contractual rights and collection of revenue) and joliette." for mears and mcgill, as for edouard scallon, a partner of joliette whose access to lavaltrie's productive possibilities always required payment to joliette or his widow, 38 the use of seigneurial privilege was an essential part of their institution of capitalist production. 147 significantly, it was the privilege perhaps more than the activities of the specific seigneurs (since control would often pass from their heirs to others, as from joliette's widow to scallon) which continued to influence the development of rural industry after the commutation of seigneurial tenure. the etchemin mills, for instance, were one of lower canada's largest complexes of saw mills, built in the seigneury of lauzon by henry caldwell who had used his privileges as seigneur to assemble the land and ensure a steady supply of timber.-" they were bought at a sheriff's sale in 1856 by the merchant, henry atkinson, whose family kept them producing various wood-related products until 1935. they remained of such importance that in 1958 one local wrote "la plupart [des gens de st _romuald] ont des parents qui y ont travaille, s'ils n'y ont pas travaille eux-mtmes. . . "^ the most striking feature of the phenomenon we are analyzing — albeit through an inevitably incomplete search for evidence — is its pervasiveness, precisely because it stems not from mentalites (as in ouellet's psycho-social analysis), nor individual characteristics (as in robert's entrepreneurialbiographical approach), but from the nature of seigneurial privilege itself. capitalist production on the basis of seigneurial privilege was introduced by francophones such as joliette and anglophones such as mctavish, by political reactionaries such as caldwell and by no less a political figure than the patriote dr. wolfred nelson, who operated a distillery at st-denis-sur-richelieu in partnership with the seigneur louis deschambault ("burned to the ground by british soldiers during the 1837 rebellion he helped to lead).** eustache-nicolas lambert-dumont , the seigneur of mille-isles (division du chene), was a direct descendant of the original seigneur (he was the fifth generation) and ran six flour mills, five saw mills and a carding and fulling u8 42 mill there. his grandson, godroy laviolette, inheritor of the augmentation des mille-isles, carried on this capitalist tradition in the period 1850-1881: "ii fut pour les travailleurs de saint-jerome une vraie providence, s'inggniant sans cesse, de longues annees durant, a creer des industries qui employaient quantite d'ouvriers. "^ if any seigneurs belonged to ouellet's dubious category of canadian "noblesse" (dubious since being a seigneur carried no privileges not attached to the seigneury), it would be dumont and laviolette yet, this did not make their activity any less capitalist than that of an "enrichi" like nicolas montour who built iron forges and furnaces on the seigneury of pointe-du-lac which he bought in his forties, after having made his fortune in the fur trade . ^ by the same token, this phenomenon occurred in the district of montreal (mille-isles, terrebonne), of trois-rivieres (montour), quebec (george allsopp ran a paper mill and a large flour milling and biscuit-baking operation on his jacques-cartier seigneury^-*) . it also occurred to a large extent in the gaspssie, where seigneuries were acquired by fish merchants to complete their control over their fishermen clients, but where they also organized lumber shanties, operated saw mills and used the lumber for shipbuilding. ^" in addition to existing in every region and under the auspices of seigneurs of varying backgrounds, it should be emphasized that this incipient capitalist production did produce for a local market, distilling, for instance, and, in some cases, woollen and textile manufacturing, as in montarville in the 1820s where american industrialists rented a seigneurial flour mill and used it for carding and textile manufacturing or, in beauharnois in the 1850s where montreal entrepreneurs bought water-power rights from the seigneur and formed the dominion woolen manufacturing 149 47 co. many kinds of production were of course complementary: a mill receiving grain might easily use it for distilling, which might also require glass production; one producing flour might use it for biscuits and, if it received timber as well, add a cooperage to produce barrels in which to store the flour. iron manufacturing took place via seigneurial privilege, both at the st. maurice forges, where the lease from the crown carried the privileges of a seigneury"*° and at ste-genevieve-de-batiscan , where the batiscan was leased from the crown and neighbouring champlain bought by the. group of merchants running them.^' it involved both the production of bar iron for export and of stoves for local use. 50 the st. maurice forges at least (the batiscan forges failed after a short time) were of considerable importance in terms of their use of wage labour. in 1843, their lessee, mathew bell, called the attention of the government "to the destitute situation of workmen and their families, residents at the works, should the [lease] be discontinued:" these people, four hundred and twenty-five souls, (mr. bell adds,) are nearly all canadians, born and brought up at the post, and several of the families are descendants of the workmen found there at the conquest, who never left the establishment; and there are besides about three hundred more people fed at the works at particular seasons of the year; and the farmers in the neighbourhood have always had a ready market for hay and oats, etc., etc., thus showing the vast importance which these works have hitherto been to the town and district ... ^ capitalist production through seigneurial privilege can thus not be easily dismissed: though the cursory evidence assembled here shows a predominance of production for export, it also produced for the domestic market, and while it used a system of production as primitive as the lumber shanty or as limited as a mill with a half-dozen employees, it could be as large and sophisticated as the st. maurice forges. 150 the phenomenon in comparative perspective the involvement of landed nobility and gentry in capitalist production in europe is already well-known to historians . " of particular interest for this study are guy richard's articles on nobility's involvement in industry in normandy after the french revolution. 53 even after the revolutionary abolition of feudal tenure, noble families—old and new--were able to use their control of natural power (streams and rivers running through land they still owned) to introduce mass production. in the eighteenth century in the british colony of new york, the manorial system (left from the dutch regime) allowed the landlords, many of whom were also merchants, to establish saw mills, grist mills, bolting houses, bake houses and iron manufacturing, using the exclusive milling and mining rights which conveyances (contracts with tenants) gave them, presumably financed through the annual rent and the sale rights paid to them by their tenants. ^^ on prince edward island, in the early nineteenth century, the land monopolies used their resources to develop a lumber and shipbuilding industry: the land being rich with timber, the landlords brought out new settlers from britain, rented them land, and offered them the "opportunity" of paying their rents by cutting lumber and working in shipyards. the value of this labour was rated so low however that it was insufficient -to pay the rents. the landlords demanded additional payments in cash, which the tenants seldom had. consequently they sank into debt to the landlords . ^ the most interesting comparisons, however, can be made with other regions of lower canada, those settled under the free-hold system. to begin with, however, it should be noted that free-hold tenure (applied to new lands conceded after the conquest) was not necessarily as free as has often been assumed. the seigneurs of lavaltrie, for instance, controlled a large part of the neighbouring township of kildare (township land was assigned through a 151 leader system which granted vast portions of townships to individuals or land companies who were then responsible for further granting lots to settlers). robert maintains that free and common soccage "impliquait un achat pur et simple de la terre, libre par la suite de tout lien", but writes elsewhere that the contracts of concession joliette made for land in kildare included the obligation to have wood sawed at his mills. thus, the township lands "§taient dans la realite partie integrante de la seigneurie de lavaltrie et etaient consideres comme tels par les seigneurs."-5" there is reason to believe that this was not an isolated case: the 1851 reports of the special committee appointed to inquire into the causes which retard the settlement of the eastern townships reproduced in its entirety a contract of concession with an impressive list of obligations, between charles turgeon, esq., "merchant, residing in the city of quebec, proprietor of certain lands situate in the township of maddington" and jacques dion, farmer. the sale was made "in consideration of an annual, perpetual and irredeemable ground-rent, rent fonciere, non rachetable , of one shilling currency" payable after redemption of a constituted rent of l 112. 10s; payment of consituted rent could be delayed in return for an annual and perpetual ground rent of 20 shillings during the purchaser's personal occupation which upon any transfer of the property would "be increased by the said change of title, until it be equivalent to the legal interest upon the said capital sum of i 112." the vendor and his heirs also had the right of pre-emption over the land in whole or in part. he reserved the rivers and brooks, mines, mineral lands, minerals, quarries of stone or slate, and limestone, timber, "as also the proprietorship of a land of six arpents in superficie, fit and proper for the construction and erection of one or more ?rist or saw mills, or any other mills or manufactories whatsoever; as also 152 for a road, as a means of communications therewith" subject only to payment of "the value of the clearing or improvement." it was also "expressly agreed, by and between the said parties, that neither the said purchaser, his heirs, nor any of their successors whomsoever .. .shall ever in any case construct any grist-mill or saw-mill upon the said land."-'' this was a set of servitudes as complete as any seigneurial contract might include. not surprisingly, then, there are cases of township land grantees who operated manufactures on their land grants. in his 1815 topographical description of lower canada , for instance, joseph bouchette described hyat's mills, "a valuable property" at the foot of the great fall at the forks of the st. francis, township of ascot, belonging to gilbert hyat, one of ascot's original grantees, and its largest landowner. ^° when ascot came under the domination of the british american land company in the mid-nineteenth century, the town of hyat's mills was renamed sherbrooke. another interesting case is that of paul holland knowlton, who was appointed agent to dispose of unsold land in brome township in 1827 and had purchased much of the land himself in a few years' time. at his first farm, on brome lake, settled in 1815, he had operated a store and distillery. in 1834 he moved to a stream flowing into the lake, over which he took up water rights, and set up a saw mill to produce building materials, as well as "a large house with offices attached, a smithy and its shop, a pearlashery and, later, a store and grist mill which became the nucleus of the village of knowlton ... these facilties enhanced the value of the wild land in the neighbourhood, much of which either belonged to him or passed through his hands. "->' more important to this analysis than the fact that even township land sometimes included the expropriation of the producer's surplus through legal 153 coercion (i.e., rent, milling obligations) is the exploitation by grantees of their control over resources such as land, motive power and raw materials to establish manufactures. in nations such as france, where feudal tenure had been almost universal, the control of such resources was historically connected to coercive surplus extortion. in north america, however, once the aboriginal population was eliminated there was an abundance of unsettled, unoccupied land, and these resources could be monopolized by an elite under a variety of legal forms. thus, the capitalist activity of seigneurs in lower canada must be seen as growing out of the institutionalization of the control and exploitation of resources in a land in large part not yet settled (by europeans) during the transition to capitalism, not merely a capitalistic transformation of the exploitation of feudalistic privilege. "0 rural manufacture was a transitional phenomenon which no longer required the outright control over land and labour exercised by feudal lords but, merely, the coercive power of the law and market relationships. this coercive power or de facto control could be exercised through bourgeois property (as in post-revolutionary france or in prince edward island) or through a semi-feudal system such as that in lower canada. a final qualification worth making is that, berthelemy joliette notwithstanding, the relationship between seigneurial privilege and the development of capitalist production was not necessarily simple nor smooth, the former by no means automatically facilitating the latter. to begin with, a seigneur could very profitably exploit his seigneury in an essentially rentier fashion: simply using his various privileges (such as the rents, banalitfis, corvee, right of concession and retrait and, thus, of speculation) to extract the maximum amount of surplus from his censitaires without "ever introducing new, capitalist productive relationships.^ moreover, the 154 agitation by the montreal bourgeoisie for an end to the sulpician seminary's privilege over their seigneury of montreal as early as the 1820s demonstrates that the existence of those privileges could also conflict with capitalist development. °^ the "commutation" of seigneurial tenure in 1854 suggests that it eventually did become incompatible with further capitalist development. it was legislated by a liberal-tory coalition in the assembly, under the influence of the lieutenant-governor, suggesting a high degree of consensus on the issue among various elements of the dominant classes. the result was a profoundly non-revolutionary transformation of land tenure, in which seigneurs kept unconceded land as private property and were indemnified by the state for their privileges, while the cens et rentes were paid off to them by the censitaires in either a lump sum or over time."-' this transformation was necessary, however, for the consolidation of capitalism in quebec. rural manufacture under whatever form was, as i have pointed out, inherently transitional. the full development of capitalism required the elimination of urban crafts in favour of factory production. fully capitalist production in the cities required "la dif ferenciation de la masse paysanne et sa polarisation entre le capital et le travail salarie,""^ which the "commutation" of the older, pre-capitalist relations of production in the countryside ensured. conclusions the most important aspect of nineteenth century quebec history is its transition from a rural society dominated by agricultural production to an urban one characterized by industrial production. in marxist terms, this was the transition to capitalism, from a population of petty producers whose 155 surplus was expropriated under coercive sanction (as well as through exchange), to one of property-less wage earners whose surplus was expropriated by those in control of the means of production to whom they sold their labour-power. earlier marxist and neo-marxist analyses have emphasized the importance of merchant capital ("penned in the sphere of circulation") and of the burdens imposed on agricultural production by seigneurial tenure and land monopolies in lower canada, implying some form of "underdevelopment" in the (capitalist) economy (which eventually resulted). the only such analysis which has examined industrial production which emerged on the basis of seigneurial privilege (and often in connection with merchant capital )rejected such production as essentially mercantile and feudalistic. in fact, not only was such industrial production capitalist, in the sense of the sale of labour-power by property-less wage earners to persons monopolizing the means of production but, other characteristics of this production matched marx's description of the transitional phenomenon of manufacture ("not yet the factory"), the form of capital's first appearance, manufacture transforms the rural subsidiary occupations, requiring a concentration of labour-power, natural power and of the means of production as well as "mass-production, sales to a general market, [and] monetary wealth on the part of the entrepreneur." moreover, the fact that such production followed the "non-revolutionizing path" of capitalist development ("the merchant becomes an industrialist") did not make it any less capitalist. the ensemble of privileges which constituted seigneurial tenure for the seigneur (and were sometimes found even under free-hold tenure) steadily increased during this period at the expense of the petty producers and included many of the requirements of manufacture, particularly concentration 156 of natural power and the means of production. speculative practices in the concession of land increased the available labour power, just as upward pressure on cens et rentes provided a growing source of monetary wealth. thus, while barthelemy joliette and his village d'industrie at lavaltrie is the best-known example in the historical literature, a survev of the secondary and printed primary sources quickly reveals that the institution of capitalist production on the basis of seigneurial privilege was widespread in lov?er canada, occurring in all regions, under seigneurs of varying backgrounds and with a variety of products, including some for domestic consumption as well as export and sometimes using quite sophisticated technology. manufacture developed similarly (under the direction of landlords or their lessees) in other parts of north america where land tenure allowed a monopolization of motive power and natural resources and sometimes, in addition, the coercive extortion of surplus from producers in the form of rent. profitable exploitation of seigneurial privilege did not necessarily result in manufacture, nor did manufacture always develop out of seigneurial privilege and, in the case of montreal, seigneurial privilege came into conflict with nascent capitalist production early on. yet, in louise dech§ne's words: loin d'etre un repoussoir, les diverses fonctions et contraintes extra-economiques autorisees par la loi des fiefs constituaient une forme ideale de prelevement sur la petite production. la bourgeoisie de toutes origines trouvait provisoirement son compte a oaintenir les rapports sociaux existants, un type de propriete qui n'entre pas en contradiction avec le developpement general du pays avant la seconde moitie du xixe siecle." this is in sharp contrast to mediterranean france, for instance, where, by 1788, the bourgeoisie had already concluded that seigneurial property— in particular the "moulin banal"—was an obstacle to growth end to progress in production. 66 157 this analysis has included only a discussion of the theoretical implications of capitalist production based on seigneurial privilege, as well as its broadest characteristics. a quantitative portrait of the phenomenon over time is needed, though it may prove elusive in view of the available sources. beyond that, however, the very fact of capitalist development growing out of seigneurial privilege in lower canada places the institution of seigneurial tenure and its eventual "communtation" , the political and social struggles surrounding it, at the top of the historical agenda if we are to understand quebec's transition to capitalism. notes * the author gratefully acknowledges the help stet professors richard rice, brian young, and louise dechsne, and by alexander wright and vince masciotra, through their comments and criticism, and most especially richard rice's inspired teaching. responsibility for any errors rests, of course, with me. 1. rodney hilton, "introduction," p. 30; "capitalism—what's in a name?", p. 148; in hilton, et al, the transition from feudalism to capitalism , london: verso, 1980. 2. r.t. naylor, "the rise and fall of the third commercial empire of the st. lawrence," in gary teeple, ed., capitalism and the national question in canada , toronto: university of toronto press, 1972, p. 35. 3. stanley b. ryerson, unequal union: confederation and the roots of conflict in the canadas, 1815-1873 , toronto: progress, 1973, p. 30-31, 39-40. 4. ernest mandel, late capitalism , london: verso, 1978, p. 53-54. the historical materialist analysis of canada's social and economic evolution is in its infancy. what follows is an examination of a single aspect of quebec's transition to a capitalism still poorly understood. 5. serge courville, "la crise agricole au bas-canada, elements d'une reflexion geographique , " (2 parts) cahiers de geographie du quebec , vol. 24, nos. 62 and 63 ("septembre, decembre 1980), p. 391. 6. c.p. lucas, ed., lord durham's report on the affairs of british north america, vol. 2, p. 24; cited in ryerson, p. 30. 158 7. louise dechine, "l'evolution du regime seigneurial au canada: le cas de montreal aux xviie et xviiie siecles," recherches sociographiques , vol. 12, no. 2 (mai-aotit 1971), p. 151-73. 8. dechene, p. 181. seigneurial tenure in quebec was, after all, the creation of the seventeenth century french absolutist state, a state perry anderson characterized as "accompanied not by a decrease in the economic security of noble landownership, but by a corresponding increase in the general rights of private property"; perry anderson, lineages of the absolutist state , london: rilb, 1974, p. 428-29. 9. courville, p. 221. 10. serge courville, "rente declaree payee sur la censive de 90 arpents au recensement nominatif de 1831: methodologie d'une recherche," cahiers de geographie du quebec , vol. 27, no. 70 (avril 1983), p. 59. 11. journals of the house of assembly of lower canada , vol. 42, 1832-33, 12th december. 12. ibid ., vol. 34, 1825, 16th march. 13. j.c. robert, "un seigneur entrepreneur, barthelemy joliette et la fondation du village d'industrie (joliette), 1822-1851," revue d'histoire de l'amerique francaise , vol. 26, no. 3 (decembre 1972), p. 375-97. 14. for this essay we have used robert's thesis: "l'activite economique de berthelemy joliette et la fondation du village d'industrie (joliette), 1822-1850," m.a. these, universite de montreal, 1971. 15. fernand ouellet, "propriete seigneuriale et groupes sociaux dans la vallee du st-laurent (1663-1840)," in melanges d'histoire du canada francais offerts au professeur marcel trudel , ottawa: ed. de l'universite d'ottawa, p. 206, 212. 16. gerald bernier and daniel salee, "appropriation fonciere et bourgeoisie oerchande: elements pour une analyse de l'economie aarchande du 3as-canada avant 1846," rhaf , vol. 36, no. 2 (septembre 1982), p. 165, 191, 192. 17. ibid ., p. 179-80. 18. ibidem , p. 180. 19. robert, p. 30. 20. j.w.m. (sic), "notes sur les seigneuries du district de rimouski," bulletin des recherches historiques , vol. 17 (1911), p. 243. 21. robert, p. 92-93. in this essay i do not explicitly consider class struggle, either between censitaires and seigneurs (courville is useful on this point) or seigneur-capitalists and wage-labourers. this is because most of the sources used (local histories, parliamentary papers) refer co it only rarely and even these references would require a separate and cotaplex analysis. 159 22. karl marx, capital , vol. 3, moscow: progress, 1959 ed., part iv, chapter xx, p. 325. 23. karl marx, pre-capitalist economic formations , new york: international, 1964, p. 99. 24. sernier and salee, p. 192; naylor .also suggests this, p. 3 and p. 34, n. 7. 25. marx, capital , vol. 3, p. 335. 26. ibid ., p. 334. 27. fernand ouellet, "simon mctavish," dictionary of canadian biography v (1801-1820), toronto: university of toronto press, 1983, p. 566. 28. l'tle des moulins , quebec city: ministere des affaires culturelles, direction general du patrimoine, 1979, p. 15. 29. felicity l. leung, grist and flour mills in ontario , ottawa: parks canada, national historic parks and sites branch, 1981 ("history and archaeology," no. 53), p. 24-25, 72, 92-101. 30. marx, pre-capitalist. . , p. 116,117. 31. john merington, "town and country in the transition to capitalism," in rodney hilton, et al, p. 190. 32. marx, pre-capitalist. . . , p. 107. 33. ibid ., p. 110. 34. in fact, both bernier and salee's and naylor's articles are less the presentation and analysis of historical processes, than of what failed to happen, on the basis of an inexplicit construct of what should have taken place. for a non-marxist survey of the tradition from which they proceed, see: l.r. macdonald, "merchants against industry: an idea and its origins," canadian historical review , vol. 56, no. 3 (september 1975), p. 263-81. 35. leung, p. 73. 36. claude bar beau, la seigneurie de la petite-nation, 1801-1854 , hull: ed. asticou, 1983, p. 101-108. 37. ibid . , p. 66. 38. roger barrette, "edouard scallon," dictionary of canadian biography ix (1861-1870), toronto: university of toronto press, 1976, p. 703-704. 39. marcel cava, "henry caldwell," dcb v , p. 131. 160 40. paul de saurel, "les moulins atkinson," la seigneurie de lauzon: bulletin de la societe d'histoire regionale de levis, no. 14 (ete 1984), p. 8-14. (originally published in le foyer , st-roouald, 16, 23, 30 janvier, 13 fevrier 1958). 41. l'abbe jean-b. allaire, histoire de la paroisse de saint-denis-sur-richelieu , st .-hyacinthe : impr. du "courrier de st.-hyacinthe", 1905, p. 346. ryerson is clearly mistaken in using this distillery as an example of "indigenous industrial capitalism" opposed to the "imperial-mercantile framework" upheld by merchants, clergy, landowners and seigneurs (p. 40-41). for our part, we are assuming that as manufacture taking place within a seigneury, the establishment of the distillery necessarily involved seigneurial privilege. 42. mcgill university library special collections. documents of the lambert-dumont family. ch 230.s208; document concerning the demarcation of the eustache dumont and j. brassier properties near st. eustache. 43. cited in l'abbe elie-j. auclair, saint-jerome de terrebonne , st-jerome: v impr. -photogravure j.-h.-a. labelle, 1934, p . 297. 44. l'abbe albert tessier, "deux enrichis: aaron hart et nicolas montour," les cahiers des dix , vol. 3 (1938), p. 219-21. a catholic chauvinist, tessier's presentation of a jewish and of a protestant seigneur is marked by anti-protestant and anti-senitic bigotry. 45. david roberts, "george allsopp," dcb v p. 20-23; w. stewart wallace, the macmillan dictionary of canadian biography , toronto: macmillan of canada, 1978 (4th ed., rev.), ?. 13. 46. jules belanger, et al , histoire de la gaspesie , montreal: boreal express, 1981, p. 162-65, 186-89, 210-12. 47. montarville boucher de la bruere, "le "livre de raison' des seigneurs de montarville," les cahiers des dix , vol. 4 (1939), p. 257; r.p. augustin leduc , beauharnois: paroisse saint-clement: histoire religieuse: histoire civile , ottawa: cie. d'imprimerie d'ottawa, 1920, p. 193. it is important to note that carding and fulling mills merely performed parts of the process of preparation of wool and could easily be integrated into domestic production, simply making it easier. woolen and textile manufacture , by contrast, necessarily displaced domestic production. 48. "copy of a report of the honourable the executive council on the subject of the forges of st. maurice, dated the 15th of september, 1843...," appendix 0, appendix to the fourth volume of the journals of the legislative assembly of the province of canada , 1844-45, 14th january. the st. maurice forges were not the only example of this: shipbuilding began at sorel on the seigneurial domain (including saw mills), first leased ana then sold by the crown, which had retained the seigneury after the conquest; l'abbe e. couillard despres, histoire de sorel: des origines a nos jours , sorel: ed. beaudry et frappier, 1980 (reprint of the 1926 edition), p. 309. 161 49. l'abbe albert tessier, les forges saint-maurice (1729-1883) , montreal: boreal express, 1974, p. 140; e.-z. massicotte, sainte-genevieve-debatiscan , trois-rivieres : ed. du "bien public", 1936, p. 79. interestingly, thomas dunn and george allsopp, with others, first leased the st. maurice forges from 1767 to 1782, then lost the lease and set up the forges at batiscan. 50. pierre toussignant and jean-pierre wallot, "thomas dunn," dcb ix , p. 289; massicotte, p. 80-81. 51. "copy of a report..." 52. see for example, guy richard, noblesse d'affaires au xviiie siecle , paris: a. colin, 1974; jerome blum, the end of the old order in rural europe , princeton, n.j.: princeton university press, 1978, p. 295-301. from a marxist perspective, see witold kula's, "l'origine de l'alliance entre la bourgeoisie et les proprietaires fonciers dans la premiere moitie du xixe siecle," in la pologne au xe congres international des sciences historiques a rome , warsaw: academie polonaise des sciences/institut d'histoire, 1955, p. 217-36; and, r.s. neale presents an argument for the english gentry as the economically revolutionary class, in ""the bourgeoisie, historically, has played a most revolutionary part,'" in e. kamenka and r.s. neale, eds . , feudalism, capitalism and beyond , canberra: a.n.u. press, 1975, p. 85-102. 53. i have consulted richard's "du moulin banal au tissage mecanique: la nobless dans l'industrie textile en haute-normandie dans la premiere moitie du xixe siecle," revue d'histoire economique et sociale , vol. 46, dos. 3 and 4 (1968), p. 305-38, 506-49. of related interest are: "les nobles metallurgistes dans le departement de l'eure de 1789 a 1850," in actes du 87e congres des societes savantes , poitiers, 1962, and "les fonderies romilly-sur-andelle et let debuts de la tnetallurgie non ferreuse en normandie," in actes du 88e congres des societes savantes , clermont-ferrand, 1963. 54. sung bok kim, landlord and tenant in colonial new york: manorial society, 1664-1775 , chapel hill: university of north carolina press, 1978, p. 142-61; irving mark, agrarian conflicts in colonial new york, 1711-1775 , new york: columbia university theses, 1940 (vol. 1), p. 64. 55. errol sharpe, a people's history of prince edward island , toronto: steel rail, 1976, p. 63, 65. 56. robert, p. 33,83,38. joliette also conceded a number of lots to himself and to his brother-in-law, p. 83. 57. first and second reports of the special committee appointed to inquire into the causes which retard the settlement of the eastern tounships of lower canada , quebec city: printed by order of the legislative assembly of canada, 1851, p. 132-38. 58. joseph bouchette, a topographical description of lower canada , st-lambert: canada east reprints, 1973 (reproduction of the 1815 edition), p. 354-55. 162 59. marion l. phelps, "paul holland knowlton," dcb ix , p. 434. 60. for a fascinating testimonial to the possibilities of a new seigneury, see john macnider's description of how he settled mitis, in appendix t, appendices to the journals of the house of assembly of lower canada , vol . 32, 1823, 17th march. macnider's establishment of farming, fishing and lumbering was made possible not just by seigneurial privilege, but also by his judicious generosity, which left settlers with just enough supplies to have to work for him and that, in turn, just enough money to be able to buy from his store. his considerable expenditures seem to have bankrupted him, however; j.w. m. , "notes..." p. 357. 61. for a clear, albeit urban, example of this, see: louise dechene, "la rente du faubourg saint-roch a quebec, 1750-1850," rhaf , vol. 34, no. 4 (mars 1981), p. 569-96. 62. brian young, "the commutation of property privilege from seigneurial to free tenure on the seigneury of montreal, 1340-1870," paper presented at the meetings of the canadian historical association, june 7, 1983, p. 19-20. note, for example, the molsons' commutation of valuable land holdings, p. 16. 63. ryerson, p. 290. 64. albert soboul, "la revolution francaise dans l'histoire du monde contemporain (etude comparative)," recherches internationales a la lumiere du marxisme , no. 62 (1970), p. 18. 65. l. dechene, "la rente du faubourg...," p. 569-70. 66. antoine casanova, techniques, societe rurale et ideologie en france a la fine du xviiie siecle , paris: annales litteraires de l'universite de besancon, 1977 ("les belles lettres," vol. 203), p. 39-40. bibliography allaire, l'abbe jean-b.-a. histoire de la parcoisse de saint-denis-surrichelieu . st-hyacinthe : impr. du "courrier de saint-hyacinth", 1905. anderson, perry. lineages of the absolutist state . london: nlb, 1974. auclair, l'abbe elie-j. saint-jerome de terrebonne . st-jerome: impr. -photogravure j.-h.-a. labelle, 1934. baribeau, claude. la seigneurie de la petite-nation, 1801-1854: le role economique et social du seigneur . (preface de fernand ouellet) hull: ed. asticou, 1983. barrette, roger. "edouard scallon." dictionary of canadian biography ix (1861-1870). toronto: university of toronto press, 1976, p. 703-704. 163 belanger, jules, marc desjardins, jean-yves frenette, with pierre dansereau. histoire de la gaspesie . montr&al: boreal express/institut quebecois de recherche sur la culture, 1981. bernier, gsrald, and daniel salse. "appropriation fonciere et bourgeoisie marchande: elements pour une analyse de l'economie marchande du bas-canada avant 1846." revue d'histoire de l'amerique francaise , vol. 36, no. 2 (septembre 1982), p. 163-94. casanova, antoine. techniques, societe rurale et ideologie en france a la fin du xviiie sie*cle: recherches sur les rapports entre les possibilities technologiques , banalites du moulin 3 huile en france mediterraneenne et critique de l'ancien rggime vers 1789: la critique des banalitgs d'aprgs le "msmoire pour servir a l'histoire naturelle de l'olivier" de bernard . paris: annales litt?raires de l'universite de besan§on ("les belles lettres", vol. 203), 1977. cava, marcel. "henry caldwell." dcb v (1801-1820). toronto: university of toronto press, 1983, p. 130-33. cothart, james m. "edward ellice." dcb ix , p. 234-39. courville, serge. "la crise agricole au bas-canada, elements d'une reflexion gsographique. " cahiers de geographie du quebec , vol.24, nos. 62-63 (septembre, decembre 1980), p. 193-223, 386-428. "rente d?claree payee sur la censive de 90 arpents au recensement nominatif de 1831: methodologie d'une recherche." cahiers de geographie du quebec , vol. 27, no. 70 (avril 1983), p. 43-61. cyr, celine, and pierre dufour. "joseph drapeau." dcb v , p. 269-72. dech£ne, louise. "l'evolution du regime seigneurial au canada: le cas de montreal aux xviie et xviiie siecles." recherches sociographiques , vol. 12, no. 2 (mai-aout 1971), p. 143-83. "la rente du faubourg saint-roch a quebec, 1750-1850." rhaf , vol. 34, no. 4 (mars 1981), p. 569-96. despres, l'abbi e. couillard. histoire de sorel: des origines a nos jours . sorel: ed. beaudry et frappier, 1980. (reprint of the 1926 edition). hilton, rodney, et. at. the transition from feudalism to capitalism . london: verso edition, 1980. (new left books, 1976) l'ile des moulins . quebec city: ministere des affaires culturelles du quebec, direction generale du patrimoine, 1979. j.w. m. (sic) "notes sur les seigneuries du district de rimouski." bulletin des recherches historiques , vol. 17 (1911), p. 237-46, 257-67, 312-20, 331-38, 353-68. kim sung bok. landlord and tenant in colonial new york: manorial society, 1664-1775 . chapel hill, n.c.: university of north carolina press for the institute of early american history and culture, 1978. 164 de la bruere, montarville boucher. "le "livre de raison' des seigneurs de montarville. " les cahiers des dix , vol. 4 (1939), p. 243-70. leduc , r.p. augustin. beauharnols : paroisse salnt~clement : hlstoire religleuse; histolre civile; fetes du centenalre . ottawa: impr. d'ottawa, 1920. leung, felicity l. grist and flour mills in ontario . ottawa: parks canada, national historic parks and sites branch ("history and archaeology," no. 53), 1981. macdonald, l.r. "merchants against industry: an idea and its origins." canadian historical review , vol. 56, no. 3 (september 1975), p. 263-81. mandel, ernest. late capitalism . london: verso, 1978. (new left books, 1975; german language edition, 1972). mark, irving. agrarian conflicts in colonial new york, 1711-1775 . new york: columbia university these , vol. 1, 1940. marx, karl. pre-capitalist economic formations . introduction by eric j. hobsbawm. new york: international publishers, 1965. capital: a critique of political economy . volume i. moscow: progress publishers, 1954 edition. capital . volume iii. moscow: progress publishers, 1959 edition. massicotte, e. z. sainte-genevieve de batiscan . trois-rivieres: ed. du "bien public", 1936 (pages trifluviennes , serie a-no. 18). naylor, r.t. "the rise and fall of the third commercial empire of the st. lawrence." in gary teeple, ed. capitalism and the national question in canada . toronto: university of toronto press, 1972. ouellet, fernand. "propriete seigneuriale et groupes sociaux dans la vallee du saint-laurent (1663-1840)." in melanges d'histoire du canada franc,ais offerts au professeur marcel trudel . ottawa: ed. de l'universite d'ottawa, 1978 (cahiers du centre de recherche en civilisation canadienne-francaise , no. 14), p. 182-213. "simon mctavish." dcb v , p. 559-66. phelps, marion l. "paul holland knowlton." dcb ix , p. 433-35. richard, guy. "du noulin banal au tissage mecanique: la noblesse dans l'industrie textile en haute-normandie dans la premiere moitie du xixe siecle." revue d'histoire economique et sociale , vol. 46, no. 3-4 (1968), p. 305-338, 505-49. robert, jean-claude. "l'activite economique de barthelemy joliette et la fondation du village d'industrie (joliette), 1822-1850." m.a. thesis: universite de montreal, 1971. 165 robert, jean-claude. "un seigneur entrepreneur, barthelemy joliette et la fondation du village d'industrie (joliette), 1822-1851." rhaf , vol. 26, no. 3 (decembre 1972), p. 375-97. roberts, david. "george allsopp." dcb v , p. 19-23. ryerson, stanley b. unequal union: confederation and the roots of conflict in the canadas, 1815-1873 . toronto: progress books, 1973. (2nd ed.) de saurel, paul. "les moulins atkinson." la seigneur ie de lauzon: bulletin de la societe d'histoire regionale de levis , no. 14 (ete 1984), p. 8-14 (originally published in le foyer , st. romuald, 16, 23, 30 janvier, 13 fevrier 1958). sharpe, errol. a people's history of prince edward island . toronto: steel rail publishing, 1976. soboul, albert. "la revolution frangaise dans l'histoire du monde contemporain (etude comparative)." recherche internationales a la lumiere du aarxisme , no. 62 (1970), p. 3-40. tessier, mgr. albert. "deux enrichis: aaron hart et nicolas montour." les cahiers des dix , vol. 3 (1938), p. 217-42. les forges saint-maurice (1729-1883) . montreal: boreal express, 1974. toussignant, pierre, and jean-pierre wallot. "thomas dunn." dcb ix , p. 2wallace, w. stewart, ed. the macmillan dictionary of canadian biography . revised, etc. by w.a. mckay. toronto: macmillan of canada, 1978. (4th edition) young, brian. "the commutation of property privilege from seigneurial to free tenure on the seigneury of montreal, 1840-1870." paper delivered at the canadian historical association meetings, june 7, 1983, vancouver, 3.c. primary sources mcgill university library special collections. documents of the lambert-dumont family. ch 230.s208. legal documents of the lambert-dumont family, 1780-1838. bouchette, joseph. a topographical description of lower canada... st. lambert: canada east reprints, 1973. (reproduction of the 1815 edition) the british dominions in north america... london: logman, rees, onne, brown, green and longman, 1832. appendix t., appendices to the journals of the house of assembly of lower canada , 1823, vol. 32. testimony of john macnider. 166 "a petition of divers censitaires possessors of land en roture in this province..." journals. . . , 1825, vol. 34, 16th march. "a petition of divers inhabitants censitaires and resident in the seigniory of lotbiniere. . . " journals. . . , 1832-33, vol. 42, 20th november. "a petition of divers proprietors censitaires of the seigniory of beauharnois . . . " journals . . . , 1832-33, vol. 42, 5th december. "a petition of the freeholders of the parish of st. nicholas..." journals. . . , 1832-33, vol. 42, 12th december. "a petition of the inhabitants, censitaires and proprietors of the seigniory of lotbiniere..." journals . . . , 1834, vol. 43, 24th january. "copy of a report of the honourable the executive council on the subject of the forges of st. maurice, dated the 15th of september, 1843..." appendix 0. , appendix to the fourth volume of the journals of the legislative assembly of the province of canada , 1844-45. pveport of the commissioners appointed to inquire into the state of the laws and other circumstances connected with the seigniorial tenure in lower canada, and appendix . laid before the legislative assembly, 4th october, 1843, and ordered to be printed. kingston: desbarats and derbishire, 1844. first and second reports of the special committee appointed to inquire into the causes which retard the settlement of the eastern townships of lower canada . printed by order of the legislative assembly. quebec city: rollo campbell, 1851. 167 marxism and underdevelopment the modes of production debate sut jhally there can be little doubt now, in any circles, as to the complete inadequacy of the development perspective that rose to prominence in the 1950's under the title of the "modernisation" approach and which found its main apologists in american social science (see the critique by frank, 1970). the events of the 1970' s (latin america, vietnam, angola, rhodesia, iran, chile) have illustrated the importance of marxist analysis, and its use as the ideological base of liberation movements. but increasingly, as more and more work has been produced on this particular subject so it .-as become clear that it is impossible any longer to talk of a single marxist perspective on the issue of underdevelopment and imperialism (see foster-carter, 1973). beginning with the frank/laclau debate in the 1960's marxist theory has been increasingly divided within itself as to developing a coherent and practically useful paradigm. what this paper will attempt to do is to review the main body of literature that has grown up around the central theme of 'mode of production' and the process of transition between different modes, and will tentatively suggest future lines of analysis that could prove useful. in particular we will look at the work of frank, laclau, rey and dupre, banaji and hamza alavi and suggest that the latter's approach is the most convincing. to apply the main features of the debate to contemporary underdevelopment we will argue that we need to reintegrate discussion in terms of a true marxist social formation that is a complex unity, combining relations of exploitation, relations of production, circulation, distribution, reproduction and other elements of the traditionally economic side of mode of production. in addition an integration of the superstructures and especially the role of the state into a marxist perspective of the colonial and post-colonial reality is necessary. history, process and totality become the key terms, as well as the theoretical relationship between modes of production and social formations. (for parts of the ensuing argument we have drawn on foster-carter, 1978, especially his exposition of rey's general theory.) i the critique of frank at the root of most radical analyses of underdevelopment we find the name of andre gunder frank and it is with his most influential essay that we will start here. "the development of underdevelopment" (frank, 1970) posited the theory of metropolis-satellite relations between the advanced capitalist countries and the underdeveloped periphery. in his work on chile (frank, 1967) frank introduced two important concepts that underlay his whole work. the first one was the rejection of the theory of the 'dual society' where latin america is divided into capitalist (developed) and feudal (underdeveloped) sectors. from its very first contact with mercantile capitalism latin america has been incorporated into a capitalist world system. he writes, the expansion of the capitalist system over past centuries effectively and entirely penetrated even the apparently most isolated sectors of the underdeveloped world (frank. 1970:5). thus there were only seemingly feudal remnants that were created by the process of underdevelopment. we shall come back to this important point later with laclau. the second concept that he introduced was the contradictions of capitalism that 'caused' underdevelopment. the first contradiction was that of the "expropriation/appropriation of economic surplus" and involved 64 the distinction made by paul baran (to whom frank owes an enormous intellectual debt) between 'actual' and 'potential' surplus. 'actual' surplus is that part of the economic surplus that is saved and invested. 'potential* surplus is that which is not available to society because of the monopoly structure of power. as david booth has pointed out this is a different usage of the term 'surplus' than other marxists have used. (in oxall et al, 1975:68). the second contradiction that led to underdevelopment was 'metropolis-satellite polarisation' . other analysts have termed this phenomenon unequal development (amin, 1976). so, one and the same historical process of the expansion and development of capitalism throughout the world has simultaneously generated and continues to generate both economic development and structural underdevelopment. rather than being stages of evolution (or 'stages of growth' as rostov has labeled them) underdevelopment and development are dialectically related and interdependent . this polarisation between metropolis/ satellite takes place on the national as well as the international level. the third contradiction was that of continuity in change. he referred to the continuity and ubiquity of the structural essentials of economic development and underdevelopment throughout the expansion and development of the capitalist system at all times and places (frank, 1967:12). so the emphasis was on structures of dominance rather than on other historical changes that latin america had experienced. this very basically is frank's model. latin america is and always was capitalist. the response to frank has come in two main stages, both of them marxist. firstly a group of latin american marxists argued that the metropolis/satellite model was overschematic and that what needed to be emphasized was the relations of dominance between the social classes internal to the colony. dos santos argued, the process under consideration, rather than being one 65 of satellizatton as frank believes, is a case of the formulation of a certain type of internal structure conditioned by international relationships of dependence, and weaver has stated, the use of economic surplus, not merely its quantity, must be the centre of attention and this necessitates class analysis. frank has agreed himself that such a focus is vital and in one of his later works, lumpenbourgeoisie; lumpendevelopment , he writes, this colonial and neo-colonial relationship to the capitalist metropolis has formed and transformed the economic and class structure , as well as the culture of latin american society. . these changes in national structures have occurred as a result of periodic changes in the form of colonial dependence. . . . this colonial and class structure establishes very well defined class interests for the dominant sector of the bourgeoisie. using government cabinets and other instruments of the state, the bourgeoisie produces a policy of underdevelopment in the economic, social and political life of the 'nation' and the people of latin america. when a change in the forms of dependence modifies the economic and class structure, this in turn generates changes in the p licy of the dominant class which further strengthens the same bonds of economic dependence which produced the policy and thus aggravate still further the development of underdevelopment in latin america (frank, 1972). what this suggests then is an alliance between different bourgeoisies in the world system and while they may be structured in an hierarchy their collective interests are such as to ensure the active participation by the 'junior' members in perpetuating relations of exploitation that subjugate the mass of the people in the colonial countries so that the march of capital goes unimpeded. although we would argue that frank has got the essence of the relationship, in terms of marxist theory it is not expressed in a coherent and sound manner. we will see one aspect of this below. the most wideranging critique to emerge of frank has been from e. laclau in his article ."feudalism and capitalism in latin america" (laclau, 1971). he agrees that to view latin america as a dual economy 66 is wrong. but instead of frank's all-embracing and homogeneous capitalism laclau suggests we view a structured and differentiated whole which is capitalist (i.e. the economic system). but within this are placed modes of production which are principally identified with relations of production and which are feudal and capitalist. thus for laclau a mode of production is not characterized by exchange (as for frank) but by relations of production , and he goes to great lengths to point out the sections in marx's work where he also identifies relations of production as the central element in mode of production. he suggests that frank's difficulties in his definition (or non-definition) of what capitalism is start from his failure to recognize the difference between what marx called 'capitals' and 'capitalism'. so in marxist terms the mere existence of capital does not mean the existence of capitalism. (the essence of this critique of frank is a point which laclau himself would be as well to examine in his own work.) merchant capital standi as a precursor of the capitalist mode of production . indeed both marx and weber recognize the necessity of mercantile capital for the development of capitalism 'proper'. for laclau then the mere existence of capital in the realm of exchange in the agrarian sector in latin america is no proof that it is "developed capitalism's" capital, and explains frank's basic mistake by reference to translation difficulties of marx's german (i.e. translating 'capital' into 'capitalism'). laclau defines a mode of production as an integrated complex of social productive forces and relations linked to a determinate type of ownership of the means of production (laclau, 1971) . ownership of the means of production is recognized as the essential element in the definition of a mode of production which consists of (1) a determinative type of ownership of the means of production; (2) a determinative form of appropriation of the economic surplus; (3) a 67 determinative degree of development of the division of labour; (4) a determinative level of development of the productive forces. feudalism exists in latin america because on these levels there can be observed a difference between the agrarian sector and the urban sector. the agrarian sector is characterized by: extra-economic pressures that subject the labour force to produce a surplus (feudal dues and obligations); that surplus is then appropriated by someone other than the direct producer (appropriated by the landlord from the peasant) ; the means of production remain the property of the direct producer (the peasant owns the instruments of production as well as 'owning' the land a share cropper). laclau writes, in the capitalist mode of production, the economic surplus is also subject to private appropriation, but as distinct from feudalism, ownership of the means of production is severed from ownership of labour power; it is that which permits the transformation of labour-power into a commodity, and with this the birth of the wage relation. i believe it is possible within this theoretical framework to situate the problem of dependence at the level of relations of production (laclau, 1971). having thus established to his theoretical satisfaction the existence of different modes of production laclau then has to theorize the relations between the different modes. as already mentioned the context in which relations between feudal and capitalist take place is the 'economic system' (others have called it the social formation) which designates the mutual relations between different modes. again marx is used to differentiate between the concepts of 'mode of production' and 'economic system'. when marx talked of the production of surplus value he was talking of a mode of production. but when he was theorizing the relations between different modes of production, or different sectors of the same mode, then he was talking about an economic system. so the level of exchange and circulation, which is the level that frank is operating on, is only the level of the economic system and not that of the mode of 68 production. for laclau, far from capitalism being contradictory to feudalism, the effect it has is to actually accentuate and consolidate the 'subordinate' mode. rather than capital destroying feudalism it strengthens it. examples are given from the history of chile which show that capitalist entrepreneurs strengthened servile and traditional exploitation in the countryside to maximize profits. thus far from the dualist thesis which maintains that two modes of production in an economic system exist independently of each other laclau emphasizes the ' indissoluble unity ' between them. ii modes of production in indian agriculture although laclau' s critique of frank has provided invaluable insights into the problem of theorizing the nature of dependence, his own work also has serious weaknesses which until recently were not really recognized. indeed the influence he has had on development field work has been immense but because of some theor. tical deficiencies in his model these have also been problematic. a little publicized debate that went on in the pages of the economic and political weekly between 1970 and 1973 on the characterization of the mode of production of indian agriculture illustrates some of the problems. doug mceachern has neatly summarized this debate (mceachern, 1976) in considering the questions that arose within the debate (what are the defining features of capitalism? how do we recognize them in agriculture? how do we define feudalism and its associated forms?). we have to focus on the following issues concerning the transition from "feudalism to capitalism". (1) the extent to which commodity production was generalised. (2) the extent to which landless labourers constituted a force of free wage-labourers. (3) the extent of capitals' involvement in circulation and relations of production. 69 (4) the significance of tenancy relations in agrarian production. firstly, on the question of the extent to which commodity production was generalized, the main protagonists were agreed as to the existence of general commodity production during the colonial period but a failure to specify when it became dominant in the mode resulted in a difference as to its significance. patnaik argued that generalized commodity production was essentially a graft onto the traditional mode and that it did not alter existing conditions of production. chattopadhayay, on the other hand, argued that generalized commodity production had to entail the existence of capitalist relations of production. that is, something (relations of production) must have changed to alter the status of non-commodities to commodities. but as banaji argues, and as we agree below, relations of production are more than just the immediate relations apparent at the point of production. so even if the relations of production at the point of production remain the same it is possible that this could cocaal a change in the effective relations of production (as compared to the relations of exploitation ) within the context of a much wider definition of mode of production that includes a whole host of other elements. this is one of the major problems with laclau and we will expand on this later. secondly, is thequestion of the extent to which landless labourers constituted a force of free wage-labourers. again the argument centred on the extent to which landless labourers were free. patnaik argued along the thoroughly unmarxist lines that the landless labourers were not really free (although they were free to sell nothing but their labour) because they were bound by poverty, numbers, lack of alternative employment and extra-economic pressures more in common with feudalism. but this is similar to arguing that the working class of new york is not really free (in the strictly marxist sense of course) because of their lack of educational qualifications, their domination through t.v., etc.. 70 chattopadhyay, treating the landless labourers as a capitalist workforce was able to connect this to the generalization of commodity production as capitalism. again we would emphasize the need to examine this in an overall context. thirdly, the debate focussed on the extent to which capital in the countryside remained in the sphere of circulation and did not actively affect the production relations in agriculture. this is the main focus of the frank-laclau debate and the debaters on india are tied up with very similar types of questions. for patnaik the distinguishing feature between the feudal landlord and the capitalist was that the surplus be reinvested in improved techniques of agricultural production. this issue of reinvestment raised the very difficult question which mceachern identifies as "the extent to which the experience of colonialism served to intensify various forms of exploitation without capital entering the sphere of production " (mceachern, 1976: 449). patnaik reiterated laclau's perspective that the existence of capital in circulation does not entail capitalism. but then chattopadhyay does not argue that. again as in the first two cases the context in which this capital operates is all important, and neither element on its own can be used to justify a characterization one way or the other. fourthly, the debate centred on the significance of tenancy relations in agrarian production. it is assumed that tenancy is incompatible with capitalism but both patnaik and chattopadhyay agreed that there were possible examples where tenancy was compatible with capitalism. thus landlords can develop as representatives of landed capital, with tenancy thus transformed as a consequence or they can continue to live through the exploitation of rent. there was also the case whereby the tenant farmed through the use of wage labour and paid the landlord ground rent. we introduced the indian debate here as an important example of the 71 tendencies in development work since laclau's critique and the kinds of difficulties it leads to. hamza alavi has written ,"the indian debate accepts too readily the assumptions and arguments advanced by laclau having dismissed frank's problematic totally " (alavi, 1975). alavi is not concerned with identifying whether indian agriculture is capitalist or feudal, for it is clearly neither but in identifying its inbetween nature. he does so by integrating the type of issues examined above into an overall historical process which is reflected in the place of india in the development of a world system and her present role in such. he is positing a new mode of production, a colonial mode of production , which arises directly out of india's colonial relationship with britain. that will be examined in more detail below. here we wish to point out two further problems in laclau's critique (in addition to the above). firstly, there is the issue of banaji's distinction between 'relations of exploitation' and 'relatirns of production'. relations of exploitation are the particular form in which surplus is appropriated from the direct producer. relations of production, on the other hand, are the specific historically determined form which particular relations of exploitation assume due to a certain level of development of the productive forces, to the predominance of particular property forms and so on.... thus capitalism cannot be defined in terms of the existence or non-existence of wage labour, for the latter is only transformed into a capitalist relation of production under certain historical conditions, in the first place its insertion into a framework of extended reproduction where 'unlimited expansion, perpetual progress, becomes the law of production' in contrast to all pre-capitalist modes of production where production was every time resumed in the same form and on the same scale as previously ... thus the error which deduced feudalism from the prevalance of serfdom and the one which deduces capitalism from the existence of wage labour are symmetrical; they both confuse relations of production with relations of exploitation (banaji, 1972, p. 2498). thus both laclau and frank are guilty of abstracting from a complex model and process elements that do not make sense except within that framework. but at least frank is aware of some of the difficulties. 72 how, for example, would laclau handle a single worker who is simultaneously "(1) owner of his own land and house; (2) sharecropper on another's land; (3) tenant on a third's land; (4) wage worker during harvest on all these lands; and (5) independent trader of his own home produced commodities " (frank, 1967, pp. 271-2). the second problem with laclau which has been pinpointed with great accuracy by alavi concerns the problem of contradiction . laclau posits relations between the two modes as coexisting within the economic system. but if they were separate modes then in a marxist sense the only relation between them would be one of contradiction and not coexistence. although he speaks of an "indissoluble unity" it is a unity in an hierarchy, which is a feature of a single mode of production. what seems to be missing in laclau' s account is a notion of process from coexistence to domination. contradiction implies process and because there is no contradiction there is no process. at least in frank there is -.rocess even if it is of the very simple pre-capitalist to capitalist variety. we will come back to the work of alavi and banaji later but we now wish to focus on a european writer, pierre-phillipe rey, who is dealing with similar types of problems, (the transition from primitive to modern) but uses entirely different language in their conceptualization. as such he is, we believe, more theoretically developed than either frank or laclau, although we will argue that his work has serious shortcomings which must be dealt with. ill rey and the articulation of modes of production for frank the issue of contradiction does not arise because we are dealing with a single mode of production. for laclau contradiction is negated by 'indissoluble unity'. for rey, contradiction and coexistence are not seen as total opposites but as conflicting features of a historical process in which the althusserian notion of 'articulation' is vital to 73 his work. one of the defining features of the seminal work undertaken by louis althusser is a redefinition of the classical base/superstructure metaphor from one where the superstructures are a mere reflection of the economic base to a model where the superstructures have their own indices of effectivity (althusser, 1977) (i.e. they have a determinate role in relation to the base and the other superstructures) both internally, and externally in relation to the base. what rey and his colleagues have done is to apply this internal articulation between different levels of a mode of production to the articulation between modes of production. so the central notion of contradiction becomes a much more theoretically useful concept because articulation can define and specify the nature of that contradiction. foster-carter has written. ...just as simmel observed 'conflict is a form of sociation' so contradiction among modes of production ±s^ a form of articulation. each concept needs the other: articulation without contradiction would indeed be static and anti-marxist, but contradiction without articulation (or transition without articulation) fallaciously implies that the waxing and waning of modes of production are quite separate activities, each internally determined, whereas in fact they are linked as are wrestlers in a clinch (foster-carter, 1978, p. 73). this concept thus brings closer the mutual determining effects of contact between different economic units than certainly either frank or laclau managed, and even clearer than that 'articulated' by alavi. rey, who is the most theoretically advanced of those influenced by althusser, seeks to explore the place of exchange in the relations between modes of production and the effect of this on relations of exploitation and production especially on the dominance of one mode over another. rey, after introducing the notion of capitalism in europe as developing not out of a contradiction in feudalism but in fact as feudalism protecting capitalism in its infancy (so that ground rent is identified by rey as being part of feudalism and appearing as an integral part of 74 capitalism because of the articulation between the two modes), then goes on to examine the articulation of capitalism with pre-capitalist modes. post has pointed out that the notion of articulation has two meanings, both of which give a clear definition of the process of articulation. firstly it means to join together . secondly it means to give expression to . so as two modes interact they are both affected by their interaction with the other. it is not a case of pure domination. as rey writes , capitalism can never immediately and totally eliminate the preceding modes of production, nor above all the relations of exploitation which characterize these modes of production. on the contrary, during an entire period it must reinforce these relations of exploitation since it is only this development which permits its own provisioning with goods coming from these modes of production, or with men driven from these modes of production and therefore compelled to sell their labour ' power to capitalism in order to survive (foster-carter, 1978, p. 59 ) rey identifies three main stages in the process of articulation, (a) capitalism reinforces the pre-capitalist modes; (b) capitalism subordinates the pre-capitalist whilst still using it; (c) the precapitalist totally disappears. as stated before such a labelling gives articulation a process as well as approaching the notion of the problematic of the contradiction which it negates. rey writes of the articulation of two modes of production, one of which establishes its dominance over the other... not as a static given, but as a process , that is to say a combat between two modes of production, with the confrontations and alliances which such a combat implies: confrontations and alliances essentially between the classes which these modes of production define (foster-carter, 1978, p. 56 ) • so articulation is not just an abstract concept. it is about the basic essentials of imperialism labour power and raw materials. it is also about alliances between classes with mutual interests of exploitation in the two modes. this notion of exploitation in the pre-capitalist mode is another important advance by rey. 75 to illustrate the above types of concepts, rey (in conjunction with dupre) chose the case of west african lineage societies and the process of their articulation with capitalism. they start off by examining the role of exchange between elder groups in reproducing the conditions of production in the pre-capitalist mode. we are back again on frankian territory. rey and dupre use meillassoux's work and set out to examine why goods produced by one group (cadets unmarried, young, male) can be entirely controlled by another group (the elders). after rejecting a number of conventional explanations based on physical coercion and control of technical knowledge, they argue that the vital element is that they reserve for themselves control of social knowledge and control of the cadets' access to women, which they guarantee by possessing the elite goods which are essential for marriage. so reproduction is achieved, in a sense, both materially and 'ideologically'. elders in different groups within the mode of production form an alliance to protect their authority and power. the control of matrimonial exchanges is one of the means by which the elders as a group guarantee the control of the demographic reproduction of the lineages. the reproduction of the cadets' dependence in relation to the elders is correlatively guaranteed (rey and dupre, 1973, p. 146). for a cadet to become an elder he has to follow certain prescribed behaviour. thus the elders had control of demographic reproduction and they in addition exercised control over the exchange of slaves , which entailed controlling the redistribution of men from demographically strong lineages to weak ones . this demographic reproduction is identified by rey and dupre as the essential condition for the reproduction of the conditions of production. the place of exchange (of slaves) is vital in reproduction. so what we have is the exchange of slaves between exchange partners as far as the coast; an exchange which is controlled by the elders of neighbouring groups to guarantee demographic reproduction and 76 which is based on these elders collectively controlling the elite goods which guarantee their dominant role in relation to the cadets. having now an idea of the traditional mode of production with which capitalism articulates we can now look at the precise process of that relationship. in the first period capitalism makes use of the exchange networks which allowed the movement of slaves from the interior to the coast and also the movement of products in the same direction. factories are then set up on the coast which make use of both labour and raw materials supplied through the traditional mode and protected by the local chiefs. there is an alliance between the elders and the western traders and 'industrialists'. in addition to the installation of factories we can identify the 'tagging on' to the end of the lineage slave exchange, the slave trade of the west, this initial contact with capitalism served to reinforce the pre-capitalist mode of production. but, of course, it was no mere co-existence, for the slave trade could only survive by exploiting the internal contradictions of the lineage societies. the demographically strong lineages which traditionally had no interest in reintegrating slaves as nominal cadets formed between themselves chains of exchange which excluded weak lineages in which slavery was no longer able to play the role of demographic corrective to more than a minimal extent (rey and dupre, 1973, p. 146) . the contradiction between the social function of exchange and the control by elders was further reinforced by this move towards hierarchization. but there is stability for a time. the dominant instance between the two modes is that of exchange . this first phase of articulation thus reinforces the existing mode while heightening and concentrating the contradiction. the second phase of articulation is the colonial period where capitalism has taken root and become the dominant mode. for rey and dupre, colonialism arises because, when commodity exchange replaces slave and trade exchange, the political power of the local power holders (where the 77 changes of exchange terminated,) collapsed. as a result political protection for trade has to be recreated from 'outside'. the period of trade in products, as opposed to the period of slave trade, is an unstable period which goes by the name of colonialism (rey and dupre, 1973, p. 146) . to destroy the pre-capitalist mode rey and dupre state that violence is a necessity . where capitalism is dominant but where pre-capitalist modes still exist and where they are needed by capitalism, violence has to take place on more than the economic level and must enter the superstructural level as well. capitalism must have a legal and institutional framework to protect its naked economic violence. this mode is described as a ' transitional mode of production' and will dissolve when the time comes to give way to capitalism proper. we will question below the validity of this notion of the development of capitalism proper. by uniting different relations of exploitation under one unity rey is working on the same ground as alavi. the third phase, the complete destruction of pre-capitalist modes by capitalism) has not as yet happened anywhere (and as we shall argue below it cannot structurally happen anywhere). what we would want to stress is that rey. and dupr^'s approach seems to us to offer a much clearer picture of the actual process by which capitalism relates to other forms of society which it encounters in its expansion. it is not a mere imposition but a dialectical relationship that is taking place under the notion of articulation. it was mentioned earlier that rey and dupre saw the use of violence between the first and second stage as a universal necessity in the articulation between capitalist and other modes. but it is this colonial relationship and its impact which they do not fully integrate into their otherwise sound theoretical scheme. the problems occur principally when we carefully study the role of the homoficence of 78 capitalism, the inside/outside distinction on the development of capitalism and the role of the colonial period in characterizing the nature of contemporary underdevelopment. rey has insisted vociferously his opposition to voluntaristic notions of the development of capitalism (as in kay's "capital created underdevelopment not because it exploited the underdeveloped world but because it did not exploit enough") and the need to view capitalism as homoficient i.e. its internal structures and economic laws only allow one form of development. again we are back in frankian polemics (frank, 1975). thus articulation will have as its final stage the development of capitalism in all the colonies. but this is to leave out of the analysis of capitalist development the role played by active human beings. as foster-carter observes, we have heard a lot in the past few years of the latter part of marx's dictum that "men make their own history but not in conditions of their choosing" and not enough of the former. as he points out, rey is prepared to make an exc-ption to this homoficence of capitalism in the case of france between 1871 and 1958. the theoretical question is, if it can happen in france then why not elsewhere? this insistence on homoficence is all the more irritating in that he has been one of the few marxist development theorists to fully appreciate the impact the traditional mode of production has on capitalism. leading from this problem is his view on the distinction (or lack of it) between capitalism emerging from outside or inside . again foster-carter has provided the most illuminating insights into this issue. that rey is aware of the distinction is clear from some of his statements: thus is the transitional social formation subject to a double history, where the contradiction bursts forth between two orders of necessity: on the one hand the history of capital itself, which for the most part is written outside such social formations; on the other hand the history of the transition, specific to the modes of production which are there articulated (foster-carter, 1978, p. 64). 79 but although he is prepared to allow the transitional form this double history he does not seem to see it as significant in terms of the overall development of capitalism. regardless of its history (indigenous, colonial) capitalism will finally only have one form. but the deficiency in his work of such a distinction leads to the third problem identified above the role of the colonial period in characterizing the contemporary state of underdevelopment. the important point is that capitalism in the third world has not taken a course similar to its development in the west. it is precisely because of tnis that we can talk of underdevelopment. foster-carter has written, and we quote at length, the 'extraverted' nature of the third world's original insertion in the capitalist world economy is not just of historical interest: it is a continuing and defining feature, not to be abstracted from, of the very essence of what we mean by 'underdevelopment'. certainly we may see the thrust of, and indeed accept, rey's basic claim that at one level the action of capitalism must be homoficent (else we would not be right to call it by a singular name, capitalism). but this must be complemented by analysis at the level of the social formations and their interrelationships, in a world system which gives analytical pride of place to what rey blithley grants en passant : that capitalism comes to the 'third world' from the outside, as foreign capital, indeed as colonial capitalism, and the extraversion thus created persists defining the character of contemporary underdevelopment, viz. as an externally oriented , distorted and indeed disarticulated 'part-economy' subordinated (now as ever) to metropolitan capital (foster-carter, 1978, pp. 65-66). so the history of capitalism in the colonies continues to be written from outside the social formation. it is this that rey misses but that alavi captures. the development of a world system perspective has been a response to this phenomenon, as of course has the work of frank. balibar has summed up this problem of colonialism as the event in their (the colonies) history is produced in the time of their diachrony without being produced in the time of their dynamics : a limit case which brings out the conceptual difference between the two 80 times, and the necessity of thinking their articulation (balibar and althusser, 1970, p. 301). as far as rey is concerned, despite the serious problems that were discussed, we feel that the theoretical basis of articulation is such as to suggest that some of the more recent attempts to characterize the process of underdevelopment would greatly benefit from their insertion into such a perspective and would prove to have greater historical incisiveness , as well as helping to pin down the nature of contemporary underdevelopment. alavi' s work is a case in point. iv alavi and the colonial mode of production alavi is clearly dealing with the same problematic, although the word 'articulation' does not arise in the precise sense that was used by the french school. banaji is the first to see the value of a new mode of production that arises as a result of capitalism's articulation with traditional modes, and as a solution to the confusion surrounding frank's basic "mistake". that is the process of integration of particular areas of the globe into a world market dominated by the capitalist mode of production was confused with the installation of the capitalist mode within these areas (banaji, 1972, p. 2499). for him the distance between the concepts of installation and integration can only be overcome by an adequate theory of colonialism, and in particular a colonial mode of production . arguing against the coexistence of modes and using the distinction made above between relations of exploitation and production he sees no reason why a single mode of production may not contain a variety of relations of exploitation . we have to try and develop in terms of a colonial mode of production why capitalism did not take its 'logical' course in the colonies. the reason of course is that the colonies suffered from the part that they played as they were initially integrated into the world-wide pattern of capital accumulation under british domination. and because of the nature of the transition from colony to 81 independence some colonies still play a subordinate role in relation to the metropolis, which has shifted westwards from britain to the u.s.a. between the sixteenth and nineteenth centuries the dominant form of accumulation remained colonial plunder, which was largely used to finance the industrialization and development of the white colonies as well as aiding industrialization in britain itself. banaji writes, the colonial modes transmitted to the colonies the pressures of the accumulation process in the metropolis without unleasing any corresponding expansion in the forces of production. .. the mode of production installed in the colonies reduced the entire process of production to an immense superexploitation of variable capital (banaji, 1972, p. 2500) (our emphasis). thus the original and continuing colonial relationship "mutated" the "pure development" of capitalism in the colonies. certainly development in india did not take the path forseen by marx, who saw colonialism as a revolutionary force that destroyed the traditional mode, which was enclosed and static (a strange thing for marx to be saying considering his stress on dialectics and contradiction), and opened the way for an eventual development of socialism. although marx was correctly able to pinpoint the truly revolutionary nature of the impact of capitalism, the installation of private ownership (instead of possession) of land, he did not fully comprehend the nature of india's insertion into a developing world system (marx, 1976, chapter 33). to examine the precise 'inbetween' nature of the colonial mode we shall now turn to alavi and his penetrating analysis of indian agriculture. we have to examine the notion of a colonial mode in the context of the class relationships and class alliances that manifested themselves in the period before and after independence. the landlords before independence lined up alongside the british rulers but even after independence they were able to retain power at the vital points, namely in the state 82 and the villages . thus the populist ideology and rhetoric of the nationalists was considerably toned down when it finally came through as legislation. land reforms were a failure in india because attempts to create a small peasant economy along the chinese lines could not be successful without a basic upheaval in the rural structure (alavi, 1975, p. 163). the impetus to develop a small peasant economy was provided not just by populist ideology but by the desires of the dominant bourgeoisie (indigenous and foreign) to derive a greater marketable surplus of agricultural produce.. they were not directly concerned with the productivity of the peasant but with an increase in the marketable surplus. clearly the small peasant strategy was failing and a new policy would be based on the re-alignment of class forces that took place in the 1950' s. before independence the indigenous bourgeoisie had been on the nationalist side against the landed class and the imperialist bourgeoisie. but after independence universal adult suffrage conferred on the rural power holders (the landlords) a new political role for it was they who dominated village politics. thus the nationalist leadership, the indigenous bourgeoisie, allied with the traditional rural power holders, and landed families which before independence had supported the pro-british justice party joined the congress party. while at the national level the indigenous bourgeoisie and the imperialist bourgeoisie influenced the strategic decisions of the government, the main body of the congress party machine was taken over by the land-owning classes. there was no more any question of the indigenous and foreign bourgeoisie attacking the interests of the landowning classes who were now their allies (alavi, 1975, p. 163). the new policy placed an emphasis on technological solutions within the confines of the existing class structure and it is this complex situation and process that led to the coining of a colonial and post-colonial mode of production. 83 alavi attempts to conceptualize the main elements of a colonial mode by comparing it to the pure forms of feudalism and capitalism, but particularly in relation to the former. as such it emerges as a powerful critique of laclau's thesis. one of the defining features of precapitalist modes is that they exhibit a low level of technology in the exploitation of the land and tend to small commodity production. another feature is that the feudal economy is geared towards 'conspicuous consumption' by the landlords in a system of 'simple reproduction'. there are a couple of things to note in relation to these factors. firstly, the scale of investments (i.e. the green* revolution) in the last few decades have only been possible because of the installation and encapsulation of the colonial agrarian economy within the industrial world imperialist economy. secondly in the colonial mode there is a system of expanded reproduction in contrast to the simple reproduction of pre-capitalist modes, but of a deformed nature that characterizes the colonial mode, because a substantial part of the surplus generated in the colonial agrarian economy (as well as that generated in colonial industry) is appropriated by the imperialist bourgeoisie and enters into expanded reproduction not directly within the colonial economy but rather at its centre. .. (it) benefits the imperialist bourgeoisie rather than the colony (alavi, 1975, p. 163). so it is a deformed extended reproduction neither capitalist or feudal. in pre-capitalist modes there is also an absence of generalized commodity production (although one of the elements in the transition from feudalism to capitalism in europe was the development of simple commodity production). in india generalized commodity production was created and nurtured by imperialism and is at its precise service. indeed the generalized commodity production is also of a deformed type. arain terms the economies of the colonies as disarticulated internally so that different sections of the economy do not trade with each other directly but only through the imperialist centre, to which they are 84 subordinated. referring back to the distinction between relations of exploitation and production we have to understand the former as the latter only within an overall context that includes the legal and institutional frameworks within which such relations occur. so the distance between the political system of feudalism and the colonial state points to the different impact the relations at the point of production will have within different modes of production. thus the localized power structure of feudalism was transformed in the colonial mode to a dialectic between central authority and local power which perry anderson has called the "parcellization of sovereignty" (anderson, 1974, p. 148). so the colonial power subordinated the power of local power holders to its own power and the 'bourgeois revolution' in the "colonies (overseen by the imperalist bourgeois) created a bourgeois state and bourgeois property and a bourgeois legal and institutional apparatus precisely as an integral and necessary component to its economic domination (alavi, 1975, p. 163). one of the most refreshing parts of alavi 's overall work is his stress on the superstructures and specifically the role of the state in the colonial mode. just as most other features of the colonial mode are a deformed form somewhere in between feudalism and capitalism so the colonial state is a deformed caricature of its capitalist model, whereas in the metropolis the state oversees the affairs of the bourgeoisie and retains a relative autonomy in relation to the different fractions of the ruling class, in the colonies the state accomplishes this in relation to a wider range of interested classes, although still with the same interest (the maintenance of the colonial mode). the notion of a colonial state will become increasingly important when we start discussing alavi' s conceptualization of a post-colonial mode of production, and the need to 85 use some of the theoretical constructs of 'articulation'. so the colonial state has to mediate relations between the three dominant classes; the indigenous bourgeoisie, the imperialist bourgeoisie, and the landed classes. and the instruments of this mediation are the state/ military oligarchy that retain state power at the moment of independence because the indigenous bourgeoisie is too weak to wrest it from them. without a fundamental break in the class structure of the colony metropolitan domination would continue, only under another guise and with the help of interested indigenous classes. alavi writes, the bourgeois revolution in the colony... is characterized by the imposition of colonial rule by the metropolitan bourgeoisie. in carrying out the tasks of the bourgeois revolution in the colony, however, the metropolitan bourgeoisie has to accomplish an additional task that was specific to the colonial situation. its task is not merely to replicate the superstructure of the state which it has established in the metropolitan country; it must also create a state apparatus through which it can exercise dominion over all the indigenous social classes in the colony. it might be said that the 'superstructure' in the colony is therefore 'overdeveloped' in relation to the 'structure' in the colony, for its basis lies in the metropolitan structure itself, from which it is later separated at the time of independence. the colonial state is therefore equipped with a powerful bureaucratic-military apparatus and with governmental mechanisms that enable it, through routine operations, to subordinate the native social classes. the post colonial society inherits that overdeveloped state apparatus... (alavi, 1973, p. 147). the political level is also brought into his analysis. but again the important thing to note is the deformed character of the colonial state in relation to the pure capitalist form. before we examine the post colonial mode it would be as well here to review alavi 's enormous contribution to the debate of modes of production and the problematic elements in his work that could be improved with reference to some of the other literature we have been discussing. what alavi has ingeniously accomplished is the reversal of the proposal of the articulation theorists, i.e. the articulation of several modes of production within a single social formation, into a single mode of 86 production which is inserted into numerous social formations. as mentioned before, for him the notion of contradiction precludes a conceptualization of the problem in terms of a number of modes of production within a social formation. but we have suggested that rey is very aware of the problem and in fact gives contradiction a concrete process. but in the end we have to ask the question: is the reformulation of laclau's 'indissoluble unity' into "a hierarchical structural relationship within a single mode of production, namely the colonial mode of production" any advance beyond the world system perspective? as alavi himself asks, "should we not speak instead of an imperialist mode of production that embraces a global unity"? (alavi, 1975, p. 190). this leads to a whole set of unanswered questions. what is the relationship of the colonial mode to the capitalist mode? obviously it is a product of capitalism yet is it only a transitional form or the final form? but alavi talks of a postcolonial mode so in some way it is not the final form. yet it seems to be getting nearer the pure form all the time. or can structural change only take place within certain capitalist defined limits? and if it is only a transitional form, alavi is giving a lot of substance to shifting criteria. so the colonial mode of production is not a self contained unity. is it then possible or legitimate to talk in terms of a mode of production? it seems the problems could be endless. but the articulation literature could help out here. transition, process and articulation are vital ingredients to a coherent marxist theory of underdevelopment and social change. so is alavi 's emphasis on the structures of dominance that operate within the colony, and between the colony and the metropolitan centre. it is just such a synthesis that is required at present. a proper conceptualization of the problem of modes of production as an abstract theoretical tool to help analyze the concrete reality of the social formation which is made up of many conflicting 87 elements. in other words what is being suggested is a shift of emphasis from the problematic notion of a mode of production to the level of the social formation. both concepts still play a vital role but it seems easier to integrate the superstructures into a coherent analysis at the level of social formation rather than at the level of modes of production. so in a sense the superstructures and the role of exchange are easier to situate at the level of the formation, mediating as they do relations of exploitation. we wish to conclude here with an exposition of alavi's notion of a postcolonial mode of production and a discussion of the issues that this raises. we will try to supplement his theory with elements from the articulation school. the basic question here concerns the nature of the indigenous development of capitalism and its precise relation to metropolitan capitalism. also it deals with the internally disarticulated nature of the colonial economy. alavi states that a new kind of struct.ral dependence between the indian bourgeoisie and the imperialist bourgeoisies has been developing in the field of research intensive industries which has led to technical collaboration and a further convergence of interests between the two bourgeoisies. so with the consolidation of their relationship, the relationship between the dominating classes and the subordinated classes is even more acute. the structural exploitation of the indian peasantry and proletariat by the metropolitan bourgeoisie is still present. what seems difficult to conceptualize is this change occurring within the confines of alavi's previous theoretical schema, which seemed to imply that the colonial mode was such because of the structural role it played in relation to the industrialized world. process was a vitally needed term. just as structure is a term which rey needs. as stated before, process without structure is thoroughly unmarxist. 88 because of this change in the relationship between the two bourgeoisies the nature of the internal disarticulation of the economy has also changed. the deformed generalized commodity production and the deformed extended reproduction have been partially altered. firstly, the pattern of generalized commodity production is now more internalized so that the internal disarticulation is less acute. however, "the external dependence is increasingly in the field of capital goods and research intensive technology, and not with regard to industrial commodities in general as before " (alavi, 1975, p. 192). secondly, there is an increased proportion of the surplus that is appropriated internally so that the process of extended reproduction is more internalized than before. because the articulation approach includes the notions of contradiction and process it is easier to conceptualize this transformation in those terms. in alavi' s colonial mode it seemed that indigenous development was being held in a stranglehold by metropolitan capital. but the contradictions that were manifest on the economic and political level between indigenous and metropolitan were given room for expression as a result of class conflict and political changes and this has led to some kind of "independent" indigenous development. articulation can still hold the distinction between outside and inside and integrate it into a process. yet the structural component of alavi' s analysis is just as important for a coherent conceptualization of contemporary underdevelopment. a true synthesis is what is required. conclusion as is clear from the above exposition, we believe that a global perspective to the issue of the development of underdevelopment is essential, incorporating as it does the history of imperialism, colonialism, domination and underdevelopment. but such a perspective should also transcend a theory of geographical domination of one area by another by placing 89 firmly in the centre of the analysis the vital notion of class and class alliances . the frankian model needs a clarification and extension that is suggested by the work of rey where the precise nature of the articulation between capitalism and the pre-capitalist form is specified. it was suggested in the analysis that alavi is the most theoretically advanced of the recent theorists but that there existed various problems in his work which although it captured the vital colonial relationship and the structural changes that this instituted, as well as the effects of those structures on contemporary underdevelopment, was somewhat lacking in the notion of process and contradiction within what he terms a colonial mode of production. thus what was suggested was an application of some of rey's theoretical concepts to alavi's work, i.e. a true synthesis which would advance marxist theory. a distinction between the types of relationship between capitalist and pre-capitalist societies is much needed. one of the major cc ceptual problems that we dealt with was the distinction between modes of production as theoretical entities and social formations . rey and laclau refer to the social formation within which separate modes articulate, although they differ on the nature of the articulation. alavi on the other hand identifies a single mode of production within which exist several social formations (an essentially correct position). the problem with alavi's (and frank's and wallerstein' s) work is that the mode of production is so gigantic in scope (international and global) that in a practical sense there is a need to conduct the debate at a slightly lower level, whilst still working with a world perspective. we need to find a middle road between the micro notion of laclau' s relations of production (exploitation) and frank's macro exchange systems. and if we want to include within our units of analysis elements of both the base and superstructures and remember marx's adage that 90 production, distribution, exchange and consumption ...all form the members of a totality, distinctions within a unity (foster-carter, 1978, p. 76). then it seems at a practical level that the social formation is the easiest and most fruitful level at which to conduct debate, whilst at the same time using the abstract notion of mode of production to inform the details of the debate. social formations can deal better with an incorporation of superstructural elements into the discussion. thus, the political and state levels are easier to define and identify on the level of the social formation, enclosing as they do, and refering to, distinct cultural and national boundaries. foster-carter warns against a narrow economism that has dogged the modes of production debate: reification aside, too little attention has been paid to other 'instances' and 'practices' than the economic: notably the political, not to mention those areas (ideology, religion, kinship ideas) which correspond to people's own consciousness of their position. this is not a plea for ethnomethodology but it is certainly above all a clarion call for class seen as the key mediator between (to oversimplify) modes of production and human action (foster-carter, 1978, p. 72). thus, the study of the colonial state can only make sense within a study of the world system. yet it makes little practical sense to talk about a single mode of production with a single set of superstructures. the state in the nation-state of the colony plays a different role than the state in capitalist societies. to talk about them as elements of a single superstructural framework is not at all fruitful. in a practical sense the social formation within which it immediately functions seems a useful place to start the debate. all the elements we have discussed have to be integrated into an overall complex of relationships and structures of action and in the end we have to acknowledge as basically correct frank's shadow across the whole literature. department of sociology/ g. university of victoria references alavl.hamza 1973 1975 althusser ,louis 1977 "the state in post-colonial society" in gough and shanna eds. imperialism and revolution in south east asia . mrp . "the colonial mode of production" in miliband and saville eds. socialist register 1975. for marx. nlb . athusser, louis and balibar.e. 1970 amin,s. 1976 banaji.j. 1972 baran.p. 1973 foster-carter ,a. 1973 reading capital . nlb. unequal development . mrp. 1978 "for a theory of colonial modes of production", economic and political weekly (bombay) vol 8 no 2 the political economy of growth . penguin. "neo-marxist approaches to development and underdevelopment" , journal of contemporary asia vol 3 no 1. "the modes of production debate" new left review 107 frank, a. g. 1967 1970 1972 1975 kay.g. 1975 laclau.e. 1971 capitalism and underdevelopment in latin america .mrp latin america underdevelopment or revolution .mrp . lumpenbourgeoisie -.lump end eve lopment . mrp . "development and underdevelopment in the new world" , in theory and society 2 . development and underdevelopment . macmillan "feudalism and capitalism in latin america", new left review 67 . marx.k and engels.f. 1968 selected works. lawrence and wishart . marx.k. 1976 mceachern.d. 1976 capital penguin "the mode of production in india", journal of contemporary asia. 92 oxall,i.barnett,t.booth,d. eds. 1975 beyond the sociology of development . rkp. rey,p. and dupre.g. 1973 "reflections on the pertinence of a theory for the history of exchange',' economy and society vol 2 no 1. 93 a rough climate for migration | 59 a rough climate for migration elaine kelly1 “understanding climate change as a security issue risks making it a military rather than foreign policy problem and a sovereignty rather than global commons problem .” (barnett, 2003, p .14) “this is the double law of hospitality: to calculate the risks, yes, but without closing the door on the incalculable, that is, on the future and the foreigner . it defines the unstable site of strategy and decision .” (derrida, 2005, p . 6) introduction in 2010, writer and director michael nash released a film detailing the impact of climate change and environmental degradation in terms of mass migration. nash’s film, titled climate refugees has since gone around the world, gaining official selection into countless film festivals. according to information contained on the official website http://www.climaterefugees. com, the film has made its way across much of the united states, presumably in an effort to educate americans about the global nature of climate change as well as possible impacts at a domestic level with regard to displacement and migration. a call for political action, the film places emphasis on the negative implications of neglecting climate issues, casting this in terms of threats to national security. given its dominant market (so far), its cover imagery of the u.s. and south america across a face, and its inclusion of prominent american academics, scientists and politicians, such as al gore, paul ehlrich and lester brown, it is not unreasonable to assume that u.s. national security is an important theme of the film. in fact, approximately two minutes into ‘trailer two’ is the following quote from navy vice admiral lee f. gunn: 1 elaine kelly is chancellor’s postdoctoral candidate at the university of technology, sydney, australia. her work examines the political, ethical and scientific issues associated with the climate-migration nexus. she is particularly interested in the works of jacques derrida and the concept of hospitality in the context of climate-migration. she can be reached at: elaine.kelly@uts.edu.au 60 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times addressing the changes in the earth’s climate is not simply about saving polar bears and preserving the beauty of the mountain glaciers. climate change is a threat to our national security. “climate change is a threat to our national security”. such a statement reveals some potentially important implications for policy directions in relation to international or cross-border climate-induced migration. an issue that has no formal recognition or (inter)national structures2, environmental migration remains in a policy vacuum. this leaves it open to be being absorbed by a security platform. thus the contention of this paper is that if work is not done to assert an ethical foundation for responding to climate-induced migration, law and policy will be dominated (in and for the global north) by a national security paradigm. this is already an emerging trend with countries such as australia deploying the navy in ‘deter and deny’ migration strategies, and the us drawing heavily upon the military following the devastating earthquake in haiti in 2010, an example i will return to later in this paper. while the nation-state is usually assumed in security studies to be the bedrock for stability, i argue that it can be viewed as an active agent in producing insecurity when we examine the north-south divide and the ways in which in the global north disaster narratives promote apocalyptic visions of environmental migration which in turn perpetuate racialised discourses of invasion and fear. for instance, one article warns of the 50 million environmental refugees who are set to “flood the global north by 2020” (smh, 2011) or another which reports that ‘mexican “climate migrants” predicted to flood us’ (naturenews, 2011). this nightmarish narrative functions in the global north to stall policy development, while in the global south many states continue to deal with the reality of regional and internal mass migration. against the logic that posits this as a regional problem, i agree with warner et al ., who argue that solutions must be thought through at a global level (warner et al, 2009). from here, i consider the privileged nation-state as bound up with the production of insecurity in numerous ways. firstly, in relation to the ongoing complicity of many privileged states in the emission of the 2 legal scholarship on climate refugees and environmental migration is available, but has not been put into action by the international community at present. see: bierman and boas, 2008; warner et al ., 2009. moreover there is a debate amongst legal scholars as to what mechanism and definitional system would be most appropriate. this paper is concerned with the dominance of national securisation and the impact of having no protective framework rather than with outlining the positions within this debate. a rough climate for migration | 61 very pollutants that contribute to environmental and climate displacement and migration. in 2007, namibian’s representative to the united nations, kaire mbuende, reportedly referred to the continued levels of greenhouse gas emissions by developed nations as equivalent to “low intensity biological and chemical warfare” (cited in brown et al ., 2007, p. 1142). secondly, in relation to the policing of borders and the militaristic management of ‘mass migration’ and, thirdly, in reference to the ways in which these more dominant states may override another state’s sovereignty or decision-making capacity in the event of natural disaster (or in the future, climate change disaster). this shifts the discourse away from positioning the privileged nation-state as a potential victim, in the position of impeding insecurity from waves and floods of migration, and toward an understanding of its active role in sustaining the conditions of instability and indeed insecurity for vulnerable states and populations. throughout, i shift between examples of more broadly understood environmental disaster such as the 2010 earthquake in haiti, and more specific climate change issues. this shifting is not to be understood as a conflation of environmental disasters with climate-related events. rather, haiti is drawn upon because it exemplifies the manner in which existing policy patterns toward specific forms of migration will contribute to, if not determine, potential responses to climate-related disasters in the future. moreover, because the effects of climate change on migration are difficult to determine in advance, it is useful to “use past and current experiences as analogous” (tacoli, 2009, p. 517). by calling into question the logic of security at play, this paper attempts to disrupt the dominant political vocabulary of national security and securitisation more generally in relation to matters of migration and climate. securitisation refers to the copenhagen school’s paradigm which regards security as the “social practice” of constructing an issue as a threat (trombetta, 2008, p. 588). this in turn permits the suspension of the normal order of things and the deployment of a “‘decisionist’ attitude which emphasizes the importance of reactive emergency measures” (trombetta, 2008, p. 588). heeding mark neocleous’ call for an “alternative political language” to contend with the dominance of securitisation (neocleous, 2008, p. 186), i present the concept of hospitality as one way that we may be able to ethically engage with and prepare for climateinduced migration; to engage at the “unstable site of strategy and decision” (derrida, 2005, p. 6) without shutting out the foreigner or reducing politics to the identification of enemies, as in schmitt’s logic.3 derrida’s 3 see huysman, 2006. 62 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times double law of hospitality refers to the notion that a fundamental unconditional openness must negotiate with the imperative to condition gestures of hospitality via programmes, rights discourse, and other policies, and vice versa, that the latter cannot be closed off. using derrida i argue that the concept of hospitality provides us with greater scope for ethical engagement with the issue. in so doing, i compare the mobilisation of the military by the us following the earthquake in haiti to the gesture of radical hospitality put forth by senegal president abdoulaye wade. rather than bracketing ‘hospitality’ off as a utopian or unrealistic ideal, i argue that it must contest the political vocabularies that constitute the climate-security discourse. securitising climate-migration literature dealing with issues of security tends to be interdisciplinary in scope and thus encompasses a wide range of approaches. it is consequently impossible to generalise about the ‘field’. a dominant area of research however concerns national security which is, according to lester brown, “as old as the nation-state” itself, but took on greater significance post-wwii when it was reduced, from this period until the end of the cold war, to military might with a “policy of continual preparedness” (brown, 1977, p. 4). underpinning the operation of national security is a belief that the political and economic structures of the nation-state provide stability and protection, and that threats external may undermine this (traditionally this specified war/military threats). before i get to an analysis of the potential response to climate migration to the global north, it seems imperative to outline and analyse the ways in which security is tied to the nation-state and the development of this field to encompass the environment, migration and more recently, climate change.4 this discussion is important in order to contextualise issues of migration and demonstrates the dominance of the security model when discussing the environment and climate change. lester brown’s foundational piece, redefining national security (1977), marks a discursive shift away from national security as a military issue and toward understanding the relationship between man and nature in terms of security. brown outlines the environmental basis of much polit4 anthropocentric climate change has and will continue to result in the increased frequency, duration and force of harsh weather events (storms, hurricanes and droughts for example), as well as rising sea levels. such events occur in addition to more broadly understood environmental problems such as desertification, soil erosion, resource depletion, an expanding population and natural disasters such as earthquakes. a rough climate for migration | 63 ical conflict, the importance of energy and resources, and the manner in which the economy is dependent upon the biosphere for its raw materials. it stands to reason then that if domestic political and economic stability is the objective of national security imperatives, the environment would need to be accommodated under such an umbrella. brown concludes that “the purpose of national security deliberations should not be to maximize military strength but to maximize national security” (brown, 1977, p. 37). over fifteen years later, joseph j. romm likewise notes that the broadening of security outside of traditional military concerns and into areas like the environment witnesses the diminishing import of military security (romm, 1993, p.1). in this sense, widening the concept acknowledges the diversity of issues that may impact the nation-state’s sense of wellbeing as well as the variety of possible ways of responding to problems. theoretically, ‘human security’ goes a step further, shifting the emphasis away from the state and toward the individual.5 however, even as the discourse of security is now recognisable in discussions outside of traditional military concerns, the alignment of the environment as a defence issue has become increasingly apparent. as richard a. matthew tells us, while many, especially environmentalists, saw the defence industry as inextricably bound up with the problems of ecological disaster, the environment soon emerged as an aspect of national security and, from the 1980s onward in the united states, continued to be included in its agenda (matthew, 2000, p. 105). despite some reservations on the left side of political activism, many fought for the inclusion of environmentalism in the national security policy domain (matthews, 2000, p. 107). with this move, matthew marks precisely what is at stake: while inclusion may have initially been desired as a result of a fear that without any recognition of the problem at a national level the response would be one of neglect and continued environmental degradation, the contemporary context reveals to us the costs of such inclusion. in the decision to include environmental security into its defence agenda, a large range of economic, social and political issues could now be interpreted utilising the rubric of defence and the apparatus of the military. 5 roland paris’ much cited text “human security: paradigm shift or hot air” (2001), suggests that the umbrella term human security is too broad to assist policy makers or academic researchers alike. in a different manner, migel de larrinaga and marc g. doucet in “sovereign power and the biopolitics of human security” (2008), argue that the paradigm of human security extends the reach of sovereign and biopolitical modalities of power. in this sense, taking an approach popularised by giorgio agamben they contend that human security is simply another means via which sovereign power takes hold of life. 64 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times drawing diverse issues under the same umbrella of securitisation has the effect of, as jef huysmans notes regarding migration, determining the operation of the political as the identification of an “existential” threat, in the tradition of politics handed down since schmitt (huysmans, 2006, p. 126). across the global north–for instance, in the eu6, australia, and the us–unexpected migration has witnessed the deployment of the military, something which united states naval war college associate professor paul smith writes, “partially reflects a paradigm shift in how international migration is being considered. what was once a social or labor issue has now transformed often into a security matter” (smith, 2007, p. 628). following this, smith argues that while this may present a workable short-term solution for the ‘host’ state, in the long-term, states must confront the “dilemma” of “how to accommodate the predicated surge in environmental migrants” (smith, 2007, p. 633). the dominance of the security paradigm can be seen in recent efforts to lock down a concept of climate security which can then be effectively mobilised by policymakers, extending its reach from environmental and migration discourse into climate change. steen nordstrom has suggested that even though climate change is an “odd security problem to address” (nordstrom, 2010, p. 6), because it is a “threat multiplier” it needs to be more tightly tied to national security and multilateral discussion forums (nordstrom, 2010, p. 9). again the language of threat dominates. because migration is a knock-on or one of the threats multiplied by unstable climatic conditions, one can only assume then that it should be subsumed under the umbrella of national security. indeed, joshua w. busby has contended that the “spillover from neighbours” may in turn require “military mobilization to contain the population movement or provide essential services” (busby, 2008, p. 477). in the following section, this blurring of humanitarian aid and military mission in the interests of national security will be discussed. marie julia trombetta recognises the difficulty of implementing climate security, arguing that its complexity arises in the paradoxical need to both transform and protect “the existing economic structure and way of life” (trombetta, 2008, p. 591). while environmental security takes account of the entire biosphere, climate security concerns the “maintenance of stable climatic conditions as a prerequisite of all human enterprises” (trombetta, 2008, p. 595). the ambition to secure stable climatic conditions is central to the issues of displacement and migration 6 smith (2007, p.628) notes that the eu’s border protection agency, frontex, utilises the military regularly. a rough climate for migration | 65 which arise when climatic conditions are destabilised and chaotic. and yet, the desire to tie political action to a notion of climate security reads ambiguously. how would this be achieved? normative questions of responsibility arise: if a nation-state has benefited historically from high carbon emissions should it take on more migrants/refugees? how can we weigh this against the host nations own sustainability needs? how can we think through hospitality in this setting? it is at this juncture–of sustainability and social justice–that states need to do ethical work. even as the difficulties, paradoxes and oddities of merging climate and security are signposted by academics, the coupling of climate change with security, and thus the association to “potential or real threat” (liotta, 2005, p. 49) can be seen in the establishment of major government and non-government bodies such as the cia’s centre on climate change and national security in late september 2009.7 indeed this development builds on what john tirman has highlighted as the ways in which security discourse has taken a leading role in the administration and regulation of immigration post 9/11 in the us (tirman, 2006). in addition to the formation of national bodies, the united states department of defence quadrennial defence review report 2010, which provides an overview of the strategic framework for its national defence force, includes the subsection “creating a strategic approach to climate and energy”. in this brief section we are told that that climate change, alongside energy, will play a key role “in shaping the future security environment” (p. 84). taking a holistic approach, the document notes that “climate change, energy security and economic stability are inextricably linked” (p. 84). this echoes brown, writing almost 40 years earlier, rhetorically tying national security to sustainability (even the defence force is involved in making its operations more ecologically sustainable!). the preservation or defence of the environment and climate is crucial for continued economic prosperity. the conclusion is drawn that the military as well as civil bodies will be required to deal with “instability or conflict” resulting from climate change (p. 85). interestingly, mass migration is mentioned once briefly and cautiously–pointing to the possibility that national responses will privilege national security over other possible modes of engagement. the move toward heightened border protectionism8 is crucial to scrutinise given the role of such privileged nation-states in the emergence of anthropocentric climate change as well as the uneven burden 7 see https://www.cia.gov/news-information/press-releases-statements/center-on-climatechange-and-national-security.html. 8 see paul smith (2007) for an overview of the various ways in which military security paradigms have been employed against migrants. 66 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times the global south will be dealt in terms of migration (tacoli, 2009, p. 515).9 in the context of climate change and migration the apparatus of security extends in two directions: one, it simultaneously, and from afar, contains migratory movements by positing responsibility as a local or regional issue, rather than a global concern, a point reflected in the failure to generate an international definition of a climate and/or environmental migrant or refugee. as simon dalby has noted, “spatial strategies of containment” have always been part of security discourse (dalby, 2002, p. 38). even as pre-established migration routes suggest a local or regional trajectory, there needs to be a global focus to policy outlook and an appreciation of “mobility...as part of the solution rather than the problem” (tacoli, 2009, p. 514). part of this solution needs to be the reintroduction of hospitality into the debate. this would challenge the current practice of “warehousing” refugees, or what u.s committee for refugee’s executive director, levinia limón, referred to as “coercing people who have fled persecution to live in crowded, destitute and dangerous encampments” (limón cited in fernandes, 2007, p. 142). secondly, as outlined above, in the global north, securitising migration promotes the deployment of the military in the event of mass migration, setting security against hospitality or ethics, and short-term reactionary politics against long term legislative and policy development. while there seems to be an acknowledgement of the difficulty yet urgency of defining climate-induced migration, there is little argument over the fact that numbers are increasing (kalin, 2010, p. 82). according to norman myers, a conservative estimate of environmental migrant numbers in the 1990s was 25 million, more than the figure of traditional refugees at the time (myers, 2002, p. 609). current figures put this between 50 million and as high as one billion by 2050 (christian aid, 2007), with 200 million often repeated (iom). many of these migrants come from “impoverished communities” (myers, 2002, p. 612) where the environment has exceeded its carrying capacity and can no longer sustain life. scholars indicate that when migration occurs it is usually regionally focused, leaving neighbouring countries in the position of having to negotiate large numbers of new arrivals (matthews, 1989; myers, 2002; ramlogan, 1996; swain, 1996; fernandes, 2007; tacoli, 2009). as feldman and hsu have pointed out, it is not simply a matter of chance that the effects of environmental damage, destruction and harm are unevenly 9 as tacoli (2009) indicates, only a small proportion of movement is global in scope, with most migration occurring regionally or even within the same state (rural to rural, urban to urban or rural to urban). a rough climate for migration | 67 distributed. they argue that the “distribution of environmental burdens and risks reflects the legacies of racialisation and colonialism” (feldman & hsu, 2009, p.199; also see dalby, 2002). when the political response by states such as the us, australia and the european union to the migration of peoples characterises their movement as illegal through, in the case of climate-induced migration, a failure of recognition, it could be argued that a model of security is reiterated in which racial privileging protects some at the expense of others (feldman and hsu 2009, p. 199). ashok swain reveals to us the fact that for years marginal peoples have called for an expansion of the concept of refugee beyond the post-wwii definition, which can be viewed as somewhat eurocentric in nature. swain informs us that the organisation of african unity as well as central american bodies have lobbied for change and greater inclusion (swain, 1996, p. 964). more recently, bangladesh’s finance minister, abul maal abdul muhith, noted that “the convention on refugees could be revised to protect people. it’s been through other revisions, so this should be possible” (grant, randerson and vidal, 2009). stalled political action and legal implementation forces us to question the reasons for such reluctance to either re-define refugee or open up new categories of protection. p.h liotta suggests that when threats are not deemed to be immediate and undeniable the political response is often one of refusal followed by reactive action: given the uncertainty, the complexity, and the sheer non-linear unpredictability of creeping vulnerabilities, the frequent–and classic– mistake of the decision maker is to respond with the ‘gut reaction’: the intuitive response to situations of clear ambiguity is, classically, to do nothing at all . the more appropriate response is to take an adaptive posture. (liotta, 2005, p. 52) a reactive reaction can be juxtaposed to “an adaptive posture”, which i suggest can be read as one open to the uncertainty inherent to hospitality (unconditional hospitality) while also preparing in advance–adapting–to changing circumstances (conditional hospitality). a security apparatus is mobilised in a reactive manner by global north states and forecloses or dramatically restricts both a conditional economy of hospitality, and unconditionality. moreover, in the movement from reaction to adaptation, a ‘threat’ can be re-signified. in this instance, while legal recognition has its limits, a more ethically informed conditional hospitality can be attained which responds to the needs outlined by vulnerable countries. 68 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times for the global north then, the failure (or refusal?) to adapt protocols for protection or regulation leads then to the adoption of military tactics when confronting migration and reproduces a racialised apparatus of security in which privileged states must be protected from potential mass migration, while poorer states are left to deal with growing numbers of displaced peoples. here i draw again on feldman and hsu who understand “racialisation as, in part, a function of differentially distributed vulnerabilities” (feldman & hsu, 2009, p. 204).10 while there is an acknowledgment that some locales are more vulnerable to the impact of climate change, for instance the works of myers and others brings to light the uneven effects of climate change; legacies of racialisation and colonialism are not fleshed out for their ongoing significance. in fact, the language deployed by myers in his book ultimate security re-inscribes the sorts of racial fear invoked more casually in mainstream media. the rhetoric of flooding, spreading and waves, of poverty and destruction, has the effect of portraying such peoples in homogenising ways with the logic of ‘us’ and ‘them’ implicitly apparent. for example, take the following excerpt from myers: we could eventually (or soon?) witness multitudes of despair-driven migrants heading from tropical asia toward “empty” australia, from china toward siberia, from latin america toward north america, and from africa toward europe… the repercussions would be profound. refugees often arrive with what is perceived by host communities as “unwanted luggage” in the form of alien customs, religious practise, and dietary habits, plus new pathogens and susceptibility to local pathogens. resettlement is generally difficult, full assimilation is rare. economic and social dislocations would proliferate, cultural and ethnic problems would multiply, and the political fallout would be extensive if not explosive (myers, 1993, p. 200-1). 10 at the time of writing this paper, a humanitarian catastrophe is occurring in the horn of africa, where at least 10 million people are affected by drought with many moving toward large refugee camps in the region. while i cannot do justice to this issue in this paper, the emergency presents us with an example of what limón refers to as “warehousing”. near the borders of ethiopia and somalia, the dadaab camp usually holds 90,000 people at capacity, but currently has 400,000 people with more waiting to be processed. while not all of these people may be requesting resettlement in another country, all are moving because their homelands are at least temporarily unable to nourish them. in response, the british are leading the way with aid packages, pledging firstly £38 million and then another £52.25 million. a rough climate for migration | 69 although potentially well-intentioned (as a call for action to mitigate environmental destruction), myers’ disaster narrative positions the racialised ‘other’ as a bringer of disease, disorder, and incompatible cultural differences which may lead to conflict and political breakdown. the global north faces invasion by “multitudes of despair-driven migrants”. dalby expresses this well when he writes that such representational strategies highlight “the modern impulse to control and the medical tropes of endangerment and disease, abnormality and threat” (dalby, 2002, p. 154). myers’ scenario negatively overemphasises the risks and dangers of extending hospitality. such framing is unhelpful to any constructive efforts to understand the necessary and inevitable role that migration and resettlement will play in the future.11 from this we can see that from the representational economies perpetuated in media, academic texts and so on, to the positions held by governments, security is privileged over hospitality; they are, in fact, placed in opposition to one another. in this section, i have traced the way in which environmental, migration and climate issues have been included in security debates. these debates have attempted to move beyond the national paradigm. by introducing a discussion of climate-induced migration, i have suggested that despite this conceptual development, the nation-state continues to hold enormous power over the scope of policymaking with a policy vacuum at the international level in relation to climate and environmentally-induced migration. this in turn reiterates a racialised north-south divide, with the global south carrying most of the impacts of environmental migration. finally, i have started to highlight the potential for military models of security to become the norm in privileged states in response to the possibility of environmental and climate-induced disaster migration. in the next section, i will focus on the us response to the haiti earthquake in 2010 in order to develop this line of argument. 11 that hospitality is not on the agenda for the global north is evidenced in the unfolding horn of africa humanitarian crisis where emergency aid tops the international agenda (and rightly so), but the possibility of global gestures of hospitality in terms of resettlement is not addressed. while it is undeniably important to restore homelands, to provide funding for infrastructure and local resilience strategies, the plight of hundreds of thousands of peoples demands measures which extend beyond the maintenance of refugee camps. 70 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times a rough climate for migration “border security–and the ability to decide who comes in and who is excluded–is an essential aspect of state sovereignty .” (smith, 2007, p . 621) it has almost become a truism to say that humans have for thousands of years moved in response to climate, either opportunistically or as a result of circumstance (see carto et al ., 2009; mcleman and smit, 2006). with the system of nation-states firmly established since the treaty of westphalia in 1648, movement has been read through a paradigm of sovereign rights and responsibilities. the logic that paul smith expresses– that border security is central to state sovereignty–has been echoed in politics and law with, for instance, the former australian prime minister stating that “[w]e will decide who comes to this country and the conditions in which they come” (howard, 2001) following an influx of asylum seekers arriving by boat from iraq, afghanistan and iran between 1999 and 2001.12 this mode of politics, one which barnett–in the quote which opens this paper–refers to as a security paradigm tying military efforts and sovereignty together (barnett, 2003, p. 14), contains an extremely conditional version of hospitality reliant upon invitations. barnett contends that a paradigm change is needed in which climate change should be put under the banner of foreign policy and regarded as a global commons concern. what this means is that it must look outward instead of inward; it must understand the nation-state as in-relation with other states and non-state actors. in our current political environment and imagination turning to foreign policy may only confirm the priority of the nation-state even as it demands global engagement and puts into question traditional understandings of responsibility, ownership and sovereignty. while this shift in perspective has potential, its relationship to security discourse needs to be carefully thought through. part of this demands that we disentangle hospitality from discourses of insecurity and threat. in ‘the case against linking environmental degradation and national security’ (1990), daniel deudney carefully thinks through the ramifications of linking the environment with security. writing in response to figures such as jessica t. matthews and lester brown, deudney contests the relevance of national security–as concerned with interstate violence–with the environment. there are two other points deudney highlights that have importance for this paper. firstly, deudney points out that national security has traditionally been understood as imposing a form of “organised violence” (deudney, 1990, p. 462) 12 see pugliese, 2002; perera, 2002. a rough climate for migration | 71 and secondly, nationalism is always coupled with national security. indeed, deudney argues that “[n]ational security thinking and action is all premised upon a relatively sharp distinction between ‘us’ and ‘them’, between friend and foe” (deudney, 1990, p. 467). thus, if we continue to promote a national security approach to climate change and environmental migration, the baggage of nationalism comes along too, with strong racialised distinctions between ‘us’ and ‘them’, between ‘citizen’ and ‘foreigner’, and ‘friend’ and ‘enemy’. before considering ways in which we can intervene ethically into this complex political issue, ways that break down the reliance on national security, the case of the 2010 haiti earthquake will be discussed. is there a form of organised violence functioning in the actions of the us government, despite its humanitarian guise? is there a nationalistic sense of ‘us’ and ‘them’ evident in the response? what understanding of hospitality does this entail? is hospitality even possible within security regimes, or do we need an entirely different language? haiti: ‘compassionate invasion’? a compelling example of the use of a national security paradigm by the us is the event of the haitian earthquake of january 2010.13 the response to this crisis provides insights into ways in which climate security across national borders or in the name of defending one’s borders may in the future be militarised. the use of the us defence force for humanitarian aid following natural disaster is not something new. indeed in 2005, following hurricane katrina in new orleans, the us military was deployed to ‘restore order’ and assist with aid, with a ‘public health emergency’ declared, effectively placing new orleans under martial law.14 for the american critical theorist, henry giroux, hurricane katrina revealed a “politics of disposability” in which some us citizens were blatantly “abandoned” by the us government (giroux, 2006, p. 180). this systematic neglect, according to giroux, reflected larger racial and class divides in america, which came to determine a differential response in the event of disaster. the case of haiti takes on several additional troubling dimensions. although i am not focusing on the biopolitical dimensions of national security, it is possible to adjust and apply giroux’s critical framework to the situation in haiti and argue that a “politics of disposability” has been operational. departing from giroux, i am interested in the ways in 13 ‘compassionate invasion’ was how one times editor put it for mark thompson’s piece “the u.s. military in haiti: a compassionate invasion’, 12 january 2010. available online at: http:// www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1953379_1953494_1954326,00.html . 14 see giroux 2006, for a critical analysis of hurricane katrina. 72 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times which us national security measures contained any possible migratory movements out of haiti as well as the ways in which haitian sovereignty has been completely undermined in the year following the tragedy. this, in and of itself, may be considered an exercise of biopower as distinct from biopolitics (esposito, 2008, p. 15). according to roberto esposito, biopolitics, or “politics in the name of life” is sometimes conflated with “biopower” which refers to “life subjected to the command of politics” (esposito, 2008, p. 15). this is not what giroux does, preferring the term necropolitics derived from achille mbembe to discuss life negatively affected by politics–disposable life–and deploying the term biopower in relation to the operation of racialised and classed neoliberalism: given the increasing perilous state of the those who are poor and dispossessed in america, it is crucial to re-examine how biopower functions within global neoliberalism and the simultaneous rise of security states organised around cultural (and racial) homogeneity . this task is made all the more urgent by the destruction, politics, and death that followed hurricane katrina (giroux, 2006, p. 182, my emphasis). giroux’s inclusion of security states defined here as enforcing a “cultural (and racial) homogeneity” is a useful way to frame the response of the us to the haitian earthquake, and ties in with deudney’s argument concerning nationalism. the security apparatus around migration in the us-caribbean region has been developing since the 1980s, increasingly reinforcing national sovereignty and the right to protect its borders, and culminating in operation vigilant sentry introduced in 2007: this plan provides guidance for four, broad mass-migration activities: (1) at sea rescue and interdiction operations in response to a mass migration from cuba, haiti, or other caribbean nations; (2) deterrence and dissuasion; 3) land-based-law enforcement operations; and (4) migrant processing, protection, and detention procedures (homeland security fact sheet, 2007). deepa fernandes argues that haitians in particular have been “disproportionately targeted” by us immigration and homeland security measures (fernandes, 2007, p. 123). for instance, fernandes brings our attention to the automatic denial and deportation of haitians arriving by boat while historically refugees from neighbouring nations like cuba are provided the opportunity to apply for asylum (fernandes, 2007, p. a rough climate for migration | 73 133), a point overturned with the passage of vigilant sentry. that haitians occupy a particular place as a security threat in the us imaginary is highlighted by two things in particular. firstly, it was in 1972 with the arrival of haitians fleeing political violence that indefinite detention was introduced, and secondly, the us government’s funding of the haitian coast guard (fernandes, 2007, p.135-138). it is against this background that the response to the 2010 earthquake must be read. on 12 january 2010, an earthquake of 7.0 magnitude struck the small island state of haiti leaving its major city, port-au-prince, in ruin and resulting in the death of 300, 000 locals.15 the response of the us government was swift and significant, with a massive deployment of military personnel issued within hours; “one of the globe’s biggest warships” in addition to 10,000 troops (thompson, 2010). in the words of times journalist mark thompson, “haiti for all intents and purposes, became the 51st [american] state…[or] ward of the state” (thompson, 2010). while this is certainly true in terms of the liberties the us government took with haitian state sovereignty, the us government did not extend all of the benefits of us citizenship to haitian victims of the earthquake.16 thompson’s language is of import here: to become a ward of the state is to be placed under the state’s care, to be regarded as unfit to govern oneself, a condition usually placed upon minors who are deemed to no longer have adequate parental supervision. this move has been discussed with reference to colonisation across a range of contexts, with designated populations being under the control of the coloniser’s law while not offered citizenship. that the us sought to dominate aid and, later, reconstruction efforts, undermines the political independence of haiti, the ‘first black republic’ in the world (overthrowing its french colonisers in the late 18th/early 19th century). repeating the phrase “only the u.s. military” throughout the second half of the article, thompson’s nationalistic piece gives the impression that the us government has taken on the responsibility of a big brother, compassionately pouring resources into the vulnerable region, taking the lead–even outnumbering the international community efforts with only 9,000 un peacekeepers initially sent out (thompson, 2010). the actions of the us government to this natural disaster were, from the outset, framed in terms of national security even as they sought to provide essential aid. the use of such a paradigm for an environmental 15 the haitian population is approximately 10 million. 16 the us government did provide temporary rights to undocumented haitians in the us at the time of the disaster, but this ended in february 2011 when the us started deporting 4,000 undocumented haitian immigrants back to haiti. 74 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times catastrophe makes it a relevant example for more speculative discussions of climate security and migration to the global north. the us government did not make any secret of its security imperatives, immediately deploying its national security team led by deputy national security adviser, denis mcdonough (thompson, 2010). the us gained air traffic control at the major airport in port-au-prince, regulating the arrival of aid and international personnel and, perhaps equally importantly, who could leave haiti (afp, 2010). the impact of this was heavily scrutinised in the media when a group of critically ill patients scheduled to be flying out of haiti to florida for immediate care, were delayed treatment for four days (padgett, 2010). it has been reported that the majority of us money was spent on military endeavours with only a small amount allocated to the haitian government to spend on food for its displaced population (which exceeded one million in the capital city). haitian president rene preval’s comments were paraphrased by democracy now! journalist in the following manner: “his government is receiving less than a penny for each dollar the us spends on aid efforts in haiti. thirty-three cents of every dollar goes to us military aid, over three times the nine cents spent on food” (democracy now!, 2010). aid and defence worked hand in hand with a large navy hospital anchored off the coast of haiti. thus, in addition to securing the right to control the airport, the us government’s deployment of a navy hospital in conjunction with coast guard worked to prevent passages across the sea to miami, only 681 miles away from the small island. the show of force was clear: us coast guard commander christopher o’neal saying that “the goal is to interdict them at sea and repatriate them” conforming to the directives of operation vigilant sentry outlined above (cited in rezouni, 2010, p.12; waterfield, 2010). salaheddine rezouni has noted that immediately following the earthquake, “us soldiers in guantanamo bay have already set up tents and beds as a prudent measure to prepare for possible refugees” (rezouni, 2010, p. 12). thus, guantanamo bay, a site of exception from us law whilst firmly under its jurisdiction, would function as an ad hoc emergency detention camp in the event of mass migration. this provision had been initiated in the early 1990s by george bush senior, who set up guantanamo bay for use “as a refugee camp exclusively for haitians” (fernandes, 2007, p. 136). if we are to understand biopower as the subjugation of life to the demands of political power, in this instance a foreign sovereign force has effectively sought control over movement of bodies out of another sovereign territory, as well as blocking off the avenues for migration across the a rough climate for migration | 75 sea. the decision to intervene in haiti and assume a degree of sovereign right perhaps signals a changing conception of sovereignty in the era of climate change and natural catastrophe. such changes are not geared toward recognising interdependence and forming cooperative forms of responsible action or “shared identity”, a movement toward globalism (matthews, 1989, p.175); rather this example illustrates the vulnerability of another’s state sovereignty in the interests of us national security and us biopower. this occurred under the seemingly more ethical umbrella of humanitarian aid, but it is useful to recall deudney’s warning that “taken to the absurd extreme–as national security threat sometimes are–seeing environmental degradation in a neighbouring country as a national security threat could trigger various types of interventions, a new imperialism of the strong against the weak” (deudney, 1990, p. 468). writing twenty years ago, deudney’s fear can be seen unfolding in haiti at least, most explicitly, until the us military withdrew in late april 2010 and, implicitly, in the internationally organised reconstruction process which has followed. haitian writer and activist jean saint-vil argues that this reconstruction effort is “mobilizing resources to maintain the status quo” with all but two of the construction contracts given to us contractors (democracy now!, 2011). against this sort of response “[f]or those countries already dealing with large influxes of migrants, and for those likely to receive increasing numbers of migrants as a consequence of climate change, forward looking assessments and forward planning for climate immigrants should be a policy priority” (barnett, 2003, p. 12). moving beyond security: hospitality and the climate-migrant/refugee following the devastation in haiti, a gesture of hospitality shone through the wreckage and systematic organised violence of us national security. amidst the blurring of humanitarianism and militarism and the firm commitment to us power, the president of senegal, abdoulaye wade, offered land to haitian victims: “the repeated calamities that befall haiti prompt me to propose a radical solution: to take measures to create somewhere in africa, the conditions for haitians to return”. such a gesture of goodwill recognised an historical context of colonialism and slavery: “they did not choose to go to that island. it is our duty to recognise their right to come back to the land of their ancestors” (abc, 2010). more than this, on offer was fertile land, to ensure the sustainability of any potential community. while there was no mass permanent migration from haiti to senegal, by october 2010, 163 haitian students had been granted full 76 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times scholarships to study in senegal. even this gesture is exceptional given the economic backdrop in senegal where half the population is unemployed and literacy rates remain low (39.3%).17 in a speech to the students, president wade invoked the language of hospitality: “your ancestors left here by physical force...you have returned through moral force... you are neither strangers nor refugees. you are members of our family” (cited in bojang, 2010). this message was reinforced by iba der thaim, vice-president of senegal’s national assembly, when he spoke of giving the world “a lesson in humanity”: “senegal has shown that it’s in the hearts of the poor that you can find the gift of generosity...a country that is neither rich nor developed has agreed to share the little it has with its brothers” (cited in bojang 2010). while both officials deploy the language of brotherhood and familial ties, thus “introducing the circles of conditionality” (derrida, 2000a, p. 8), it was under the dominance of security discourse that this act of radical hospitality was put forward. i call this gesture radical because it goes beyond determined rights and responsibilities and speaks to the particularities of the situation. what are the solutions, radical or otherwise, that we in the global north, are willing to put forward? in the global north, it is necessary to re-think our conditional modes of hospitality (as well as our inhospitable responses) and learn to more ethically adapt to the unconditionality of hospitality. while it may read strangely to say that we must prepare for what we cannot know in advance, for the unexpected, this is precisely what much action in the realm of climate change requires. in so doing, there is an ethical necessity to move beyond the notion of security. while some have pointed out that the constructed nature of the discourse gives it the capacity to work in the name of progressive outcomes (see trombetta (2008) for instance, as well as the acceptance of the term ‘human security’), others have argued that the term is irredeemable (neocleous, 2008). trombetta’s claim that “[s]ecuritization is not about applying a fixed meaning of security as exceptionality that inscribes enemies in a context... it is ‘an always (situated and iterative) process’ [citing stritzel, 2007, 366] of generating meaning” (trombetta, 2008, p. 591), is correct. however, introducing hospitality as the lens through which we should plan for movements of people holds moral appeal and seeks to shortcircuit dominant security discourse. while security is discursively maintained, the dominance of militarisation in the realm of migration is evident in the ways in which many privileged nation-states are deploying deterrence techniques. 17 see: https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/sg.html a rough climate for migration | 77 as we have seen, in the context of climate change paul smith acknowledges the need to move beyond the security paradigm and in the direction of morally defensible positions, while jef huysmans’ analysis of migration demands that we rethink our understandings of the political, security and the relationship between the two. dalby also argues that a shift away from “exceptional measures” and toward “routine political and economic” procedures is important in de-securitising a range of issues (dalby, 2006, p. 10). barnett and tacoli both state the need to include mobility as part of any solution to climate-induced migration. however, such dispositions are not available from within the logic of militarisation which inherently requires the violent closure of the border and thus denies the question of ethics or a more pluralistic notion of politics (huysmans, 2006, p. 127). nor, i would argue, are they available within the discourse of security even if it does not automatically infer the use of the military. because security produces “a practice of exclusion: a practice of identity and being through exclusion” (burke, 2008, p. 5), the logic that motors policy and discourse around (national) security perpetuates a form of identity that is separate from the ‘other’ or, when pushed, views alterity as a threat to selfhood/statehood. a politics of (in)security assumes that a fully protected state can be realised through force, and the re-establishment of borders, something pursued under the rubric of national security. the need to root sovereignty in forms of national securitisation denies what butler thinks of as a preexisting interdependency and vulnerability, “an impressionability and violability that are ineradicable dimension of human dependency and sociality” (butler, 2004, p. xiv). as noted above, hospitality is a double law, requiring the movement between the unconditional and the conditional. this movement is deconstructive in the sense that rather than taking an either/or position, hospitality arises out of the negotiation of the two poles. this process is also bound up with the construction of subjectivity and statehood. hospitality involves the negotiation rather than reconsolidation of identity. as derrida writes it is “the foreigner...the one who, putting the first question, puts me in question” (derrida, 2000b, p. 3). why is this significant? returning to burke, we saw that security imposes a mode of identity premised upon exclusion. deconstructive reasoning challenges the possibility of discrete identities by emphasising the interdependent relationship between self/other, host/guest and so on. for derrida, the performance of hospitality is not merely the reiteration of the categories of host and guest, but demonstrates how they rely upon and challenge 78 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times one another. in this way, notions of interdependency and sociality are compatible with deconstructive engagements with hospitality and provide a theoretical foundation for ethically informed practice. i opened this paper with a quote from derrida which suggests that hospitality contains an inherent riskiness and incalculability. this has two central implications for proposing a political vocabulary of hospitality in the context of climate-migration. firstly, the acknowledgement of risk as something needing recognition could potentially be read as re-imposing the language of security, or justifying its presence (security is, after all, one strategy for eliminating or reducing potential risks). this raises the following questions: outside of security measures how can risk be responded to ethically? does hospitality as a conceptual alternative provide a way to take account of risk without returning us to a political space of threat and danger, characteristic of securitisation? it is at this critical intersection that further work is needed, work which exceeds the scope of this paper. secondly, in spite of every effort to calculate and prepare in advance, the incalculable remains. what this means is that even if we create protocols and legal frameworks of recognition, something will remain excessive to these measures and disrupt them. in this sense, derrida’s double law gives space for hospitality outside of legal imperatives. the implication for our concern is that the currently undefined nature of climate migration should not result in a default defensive reaction; rather, it is a chance for hospitality. this philosophical reorientation is where a new discussion of practices of hospitality can be generated, where perhaps we can “reorient the politics of the state” (derrida, 2001, p. 4). jon barnett’s argument, captured in the other quote opening this paper, suggests that we shift away from a military-sovereignty response to a foreign policy-global commons framework. this may provide us with a starting point for such a reorientation and is certainly compatible with the concept of hospitality. however, in order to avoid the exclusionary logic of security, this would need to renegotiate the binary relations of ‘us’ and ‘them’ or ‘inside’ and ‘outside’ and ‘host’ and ‘guest’ which tend to underpin foreign policy considerations. it is precisely by privileging a deconstructive language of hospitality that this may be achieved. in the domain of migration, this would require co-operative action and equitable responsibilitysharing at the level of programs, as well as rethinking concepts of identity and belonging at a conceptual level. it is here that the theoretical approach of a global commons discourse may be useful in conjunction with discourses of hospitality. if global commons regards a rough climate for migration | 79 ownership, sovereignty and responsibility in ways that stretch the dominant western tradition, understandings of host and guest and of citizen and foreigner may be able to be rethought. conclusion despite efforts to expand the security discourse beyond the state and to mark it as constructed, the “national referent dominates discussions of security” (barnett, 2003, p. 2). if national security inherently excludes the concerns of non-citizens by privileging national priorities, the protection of citizen rights and the “classic national security burden–ensuring its territorial inviolability” (romm, 1993, p. 4), i have asked if it is the most appropriate paradigm to utilise in response to climate-induced migration. my critical intervention is not an attempt to argue for the dissolution of the state in the name of a world of open borders. rather it seeks it highlight limitations and point toward the importance of ethical models that might help re-orient the response of privileged states to climateinduced displacement and migration. if our critical work has to take place within the context of nation-states, then it needs to imagine ethical solutions to major problems. part of this will involve making more central the language of hospitality. as such, this paper has offered a review of the dominant security literature and its inclusion of the environment, climate change and migration. from here, i sought to unpack and scrutinise the implications of tying climate-migration to a security paradigm. in response to the limitations of this coupling, i introduced the concept of hospitality, drawing particularly on jacques derrida’s interventions. references abc. (2010, january 18). senegal offers haitians a new home. abc news online. retrieved from: http://www.abc.net.au/news/ stories/2010/01/18/2794995.htm. afp. (2010, january 15). us takes over port-au-prince airport after haiti earthquake. news .com .au. retrieved from http://www.news.com.au/ breaking-news/us-takesover-port-au-prince-airport-after-haitiearthquake/story-e6frfku0-1225819945319. barnett, j. (2003). security and climate change. global environmental change 13: 7-17. bierman, f and boas i. (2008). protecting climate refugees: the case for a global protocol. environment. 50 (6): 8-16. bojang, s.(2010, october 14). senegal takes in haitian student refugees. the guardian. retrieved from: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/ oct/14/senegal-haiti-earthquake-student-refugees. 80 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times brown, l. (1977, october). redefining national security. worldwatch paper14 . washington d.c. worldwatch institute. brown o., hammill, a., mcleman, r. (2007). climate change as the ‘new’ security threat: implications for africa. international affairs, 83:6, 1141-1154. busby, j.w. (2008). who cares about the weather? climate change and u.s. national security. security studies, 17:3, 468-504. burke, a. (2008). in fear of security: australia’s invasion anxiety. port melbourne. cambridge university press: 1-14 (introduction only). butler, j. (2004). precarious life: the powers of mourning and violence. london and new york. verso. butler, j. (2010). frames of war: when is life grievable? london and new york. verso. carto, s.l, weaver, a. j, hetherington, r, lam, y, wiebe, e.c. (2009). out of africa and into an ice age: on the role of global climate change in the late pleistocene migration of early modern humans out of africa. journal of human evolution. 56: 139-151. climate refugees. (2010). retrieved from: http://www.climaterefugees.com/. dalby, s. (2002). environmental security. minneapolis. university of minnesota press. de larrinaga, m., and doucet.m.g. (2008). sovereign power and the biopolitics of human security. security dialogue. 39(5): 517-537. demoracy now! (2010, january 28). us military spending in haiti more than triples assistance to haitian government. retrieved from: http:// www.democracynow.org/2010/01/28/headlines#3. democracy now! (2011, january 12). haitian writer jean saint-vil: one year after earthquake, haitian population treated as a threat, not an asset. retrieved from: http://www.democracynow.org/2011/1/12/haitian_ writer_jean_saint_vil_one. derrida, j. (2000a). hostipitality. angelaki: journal of theoretical humanities, 5(3), 3-18. derrida, j., and dufourmantelle, a. (2000b). of hospitality. (trans. rachel bowlby). california. stanford university press. derrida, j. (2001). on cosmopolitanism and forgiveness. london. routledge. deudney, d. (1990). the case against linking environmental degradation and national security. millennium: journal of international studies, 19: 461-479. esposito, r. (2008). bios: biopolitics and philosophy, (t. campbell. trans.). minneapolis and london. university of minnesota press. feldman, m. b., and hsu, h. l. (2009). introduction: race, environment, and representation’, discourse, 29(2&3): 199-214. fernandes, d. (2006). targeted: national security and the business of immigration. new york. seven stories press a rough climate for migration | 81 homeland security fact sheet. (2007, march 2). fact sheet: operation vigilant sentry. retrieved from: http://www.hstfse.com/go/ doc/1038/148670/fact-sheetoperation-vigilant-sentry. howard, j. (2001, october 28). transcript of the prime minister. (speech delivered at the federal liberal party campaign launch, sydney). available online at: http://www.australianpolitics.com/news/2001/01-10-28.shtml. huysmans, j. (2006). ‘de-securitising migration: security knowledge and concepts of the political’, in the politics of insecurity: fear, migration, and asylum in the eu. usa and canada. routledge. giroux, h.a. (2006). reading hurricane katrina: race, class, and the politics of disposability. college literature. 33.3: 171-196. grant, h., randerson, j., vidal, j. (2009, december 4). uk should open its borders to climate refugees, says bangladeshi minister. the guardian. retrieved from: http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/nov/30/ rich-west-climate-change international organisation of migration. retrieved from: http://www.iom. int/jahia/jahia/complex-nexus. kalin, w. (2010). conceptualising climate-induced displacement. in climate change and displacement: multidisciplinary perspectives. ed. jane mcadam. oxford and portland, oregon. hart publishing. kelly, e. (2006). white hospitality: a critique of political responsibility in the context of australia’s anti-asylum seeker laws. continuum: journal of media and cultural studies. 20:4, 457-469. liotta, p.h. (2005). through the looking glass: creeping vulnerabilities and the reordering of security. security dialogue. 36(1): 49-70. mcleman, r, and smit, b. (2006). migration as adaptation to climate change. climatic change. 76, 31-53. matthew, r.a. (2000). the environment as a national security issue. journal of policy history. 12(1), 101-122. matthews, j.t. (1989). redefining security. foreign affairs. 68(2), 161-177. moon, b. k. (2007, september 24). ‘address to high-level event on climate change’. un news centre. retrieved from: http://www.un.org/apps/ news/infocus/sgspeeches/search_full.asp?statid=121. myers, n. (2002). environmental refugees: a growing phenomenon of the twenty-first century. philosophical transactions of the royal society of london b. 357, 609613. myers, n. (1993). ultimate security: the environmental basis of political instability. new york and london. w. w. norton & company, inc. nordstrom, s. (2010, march). climate security: from agenda-setting to policy. royal danish defence college. neocleous, m. (2008). critique of security. edinburgh. edinburgh university press. 82 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times padgett, t. (2010, january 31). who’s to blame for suspending haitian medevac flights? time. retrieved from, http://www.time.com/time/ specials/packages/article/0,28804,1953379_19534 94_1957926,00. html. paris, r. (2001). human security: paradigm shift or hot air. international security. 2(fall), 87-102. perera, s. (2002). a line in the sea: the tampa, boat stories and the border. cultural studies review. 8(1), 11-27. pugliese, j. (2002). penal asylum. borderlands e-journal. 1(1). states of america. retrieved from: http://www.defense.gov/qdr/images/ qdr_as_of_12feb10_1000.pdf. ramlogan, r. (1996). environmental refugees: a review. environmental conservation. 23, 81-88. rezouni, s. (2010). illegal immigration: causes, consequences, and national security implications. strategy research project. carlisle barracks, pa. army war college. retrieved from, http://www.stormingmedia. us/59/5902/a590225.html. romm, j. r. (1993). defining national security: the nonmilitary aspects . new york. council on foreign relations press. sydney morning herald. (2011, february 22). 50 million ‘environmental refugees’ by 2020, experts say. sydney morning herald. retrieved from, http://www.smh.com.au/ environment/climate-change/50-million-environmentalrefugeesby-2020-experts-say-20110222-1b31i.html smith, p. (2000). transnational security threats and state survival: a role for the military? parameters . army war college. us. 30(3). smith, p. (2007). climate change, mass migration and the military response. orbis, 51(4), 617-633. swain, a. (1996). environmental migration and conflict dynamics. third world quarterly. 17(5), 959-973. tacoli, c. (2009). crisis or adaptation? migration and climate change in a context of high mobility. environment and urbanisation, 21, 513-525. thompson, m. (2010, january 16). the u.s. military in haiti: a compassionate invasion. time. retrieved from, http://www.time. com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1953379_1953494_ 1954326,00.html. tirman, j. (2006, july 28). immigration and insecurity: post 9/11 fear in the united states. border battles: the u .s immigration debates . retrieved from, http://borderbattles.ssrc.org/tirman/ trombetta, m, j. (2008). environmental security and climate change: analysing the discourse. cambridge review of international affairs, 21:4, 585-602. a rough climate for migration | 83 warner, k & ehrhart, c, de sherbinin, a, adamo, s. & chai-onn, t. (2009). in search of shelter: mapping the effects of climate change on human migration and displacement . cooperative for assistance and relief everywhere. waterfield, b. (2010, january 19). haiti earthquake: us ships blockade coast to thwart exodus to america the telegraph. retrieved from, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/ centralamericaandthecaribbean/haiti /7030237/haiti-earthquake-usships-blockade-coast-to-thwart-exodus-toamerica.html. westing, a. h. (1992). environmental refugees: a growing category of displaced person. environmental conservation. 19, 201-207 84 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times 142 implications of the domestic role of women eileen saunders the feminist movement has posed a fundemental challenge to social scientists, a challenge reflected in the necessity of providing an analysis of the causes of the oppression of women. the response has been varied, with available models ranging from a focus on biological explanations to class analysis. i would argue, however, that we have not yet reached the point where we are able to integrate these various positions into an adequate analysis of the forms of oppression women have experienced and continue to experience, the sources of their oppression, the mechanisms by which it is maintained, and the means to eliminate it. the resolution of this "impasse" requires that we begin to fully examine the spheres of female activity and attempt to integrate our understanding of the social forces which shape female participation in society. as juliet mitchell has shown in her criticisms of socialist movements, we have failed to look at woman's role through the structures that compose it i production, reproduction, sexuality and socialization (mitchell, 1966). the value of her analysis i3 its ability to examine the position of wom«n historically in terms of their variable role within each structure. the difficulty, on the other hand, emerges in treating these categories as independent structures which are unrelated in origin. for this reason, r. bridenthal has argued that it is possible to fuse mitchell's latter three 143 structures into one, each representing an aspect of the reproduction of the species (bridenthal, 1976:3-5). one is then able to examine the situation of women through an analysis of their position in the productive sphere (as workers) and the reproductive sphere (as housewives and mothers). through an historical examination, one can discover the nature of the relationship between these spheres, and the implications this holds for the societal position of women. a beginning point in such an attempt is an examination of the structure of the reproductive sphere and the position it occupies under capitalist relations. using a marxist framework, w. seccombe has questioned toe role of household labour (i.e., reproductive) in the creation of value, and examines its linkages to the overall wage-relation system (seccombe, 1973). seccombe* s thesis is that sexual oppression emerged, with the advance of capitalism, due to the sexual division of labour: a division into an "industrial unit" and a "domestic unit" (1973»6). moreover, this development required the physical seperation of this workplace and the home (i will return to a discussion of this "division" in my discussion of the transition from a precapitalist mode to a capitalist mode of production). seccombe argues that the labour of the domestic unit has a dual nature. on the one hand, domestic labour is necessary labour because the commodities of capital require 1w additional labour (i.e., housework) before consumption. in the preparation of food for family consumption, the housewife's labour creates a use-value insofar as the product of her labour directly serves certain consumption needs. such labour also allows for the reproduction of the wage earner's labourpower (i.e., capacity for work, 1973»l /0« domestic labour thus creates value because "all labour produees value when it produces any part of a commodity that achieves equivalence in the market place with other commodities" (seccombe, 1973'9)domestic labour helps produce and reproduce labour power as a commodity. on the other hand, and here is where we begin to approach the dual nature of domestic labour, the marxist "law of value" cannot apply to labour in the reproductive sphere. there are two reasons for thisi first, domestic labour is not engaged in an exchange relation with capital, and second, it is unproductive because it produces no surplus value . in other words, because domestic labour has only a use-value, it has no direct relation to capital. it then becomes difficult to measure the value of such labour. for other commodities, this is unproblematic. for example, labour power as a commodity achieves its equivalence through the wage relation. but, since domestic labour is not exchanged on a market, it has no apparent exchange value . seccombe 's solution is to argue that the value of domestic labour is equivalent to that part of the worker's wage that goes to the maintenance of 1*5 domestic labour (1973«8-10). its value, in this sense is mediated by the wage transaction between capital and the wage earner. it is also for this reason that seccombe argues that one cannot speak of surplus value creation in reference to domestic labour. because the value of this labour is seen as equivalent to its maintenance costs, the possibility of an extraction of a surplus value from household labour by capital is rendered impossible under seccombe* s scheme. the housewife is assumed to receive the value she creates. he recognizes that a "mystification" of the wage relation occurs under capitalism. whereas wages are equivalent to the value of labour power, not the value produced by labour power, this is not the case with the relation between capital and 'the housewife. the value she produces is contained in the wage received by the wage earner. seccombe* s analysis is valuable in several respects. it represents needed insight into an area which marxists have tended to ignore in theoretical endeavors. moreover, his analysis of the mediation of the relation between capital and domestic labour by the wage transaction contains important implications regarding the "political potential" of housewives (1973 ! 21-23) . the problem however is that he does not really develop his argument tothe necessary point. it is useful to explicate the structure of domestic labour under capitalism, but this in itself is not sufficient. one must question the motivation behind the continuing reproduction ik6 of that structure in its present form. in other words, does domestic labour, in its privatized and unwaged form, serve a value to capital in addition to the simple use value it creates? i am really seeking to question the conception of household labour as non-productive, in the sense of creating no surplus value. a strict marxist application of the term surplus value blinds us to the value extracted by capital from domestic labour. the structure of the domestic sphere allows for the reproduction of class relations in various forms. these must be explicated before one can attempt to account for the reproduction of sexism in contemporary society. what i am suggesting is a reconceptualization of our understanding of surplus value creation so that we are not forced to deal only with those exchange transactions which occur on an open market. if one can demonstrate a value served by domestic labour in the direct reproduction of class relations, and the extraction of that value by capital, then it becomes possible to discuss the productivity of domestic labour. i will now discuss the role of domestic labour in the satisfaction of certain of capital's needs. first, capitalism cannot satisfy all a worker's needs through commodity production. these needs must however be met in order to maintain a passive working force. domestic labour becomes the forum for the satisfaction of these needs in that it has personal value which cannot be reproduced by socialized domestic labour. 147 the family and the role of the housewife provide an area where the male worker can achieve some sense of authority and control (which is otherwise lacking in his relation to capital). secondly, domestic labour realizes a higher standard of living for the worker than is realized in his actual wages. workers are paid a wage to cover the cost of maintaining their labour power. domestic labour is the activity which transforms that wage into usable goods. obviously, there are alternative methods of maintaining labour power: restaurants, laundries, tailors, etc. but it is cheaper for capital to maintain domestic labour than to give workers higher wages so that they can buy these services on a competitive market. the wage labour system is sustained by the socially necessary, but private, labour of housewives and mothers. child rearing, cleaning, laundry, maintenance of property, food preparation, reproduction, etc. are all necessary elements in the maintenance of life and the reproduction of the work force. in this sense, they are all aspects of the mode of reproduction. this sphere produces daily and generationally the labour needed by capital. fianlly, by maintaining an economically dependent, and therefore passive, individual within the family the industrial sector creates an individual who is easier to manipulate. historieally this has been the casei women have functioned as a cheap and passive reserve work force. this is reflected in their unequal wages, narrow choice of occupations, and ikb underrepresentation in trade unions. it is a situation which has been relativiely easy to maintain. she has no structural responsibility in the waged labour force. rather, her participation is seen as transitory, depending on the labour needs of the industrialized sector. reserve labour power is stored in the family, drawn upon when necessary, and then reabsorded when no longer needed. the position of women as unwaged privatized labourers in the family is reproduced outside of the family. they have traditionally been located in low wage positions in more or less marginal occupations. however, one must be careful not to view female wage labour as only transitory in nature. this is a problem in seccombe's analysis, as well as in that of other marxists who only deal with the housewife and ignore women as workers. the error is compounded when marxists attempt to find a ba;is for the unity between the working class and housewives. to see only her domestic labour or her position as wage earner as the source of unity is to ignore that women are often both domestic labourers and wage earners. the central feature of women under capitalism is not their position as domestic labourers, but rather their dual role . the task is to relate these two roles in a coherent fashion -something which marxists have not yet done. when marxist feminists deal with the issue of wage labour, they assume that their interests are synonymous with working class interests. this is not the case however, due to the contradictory nature of wage labour and 1^9 domestic labour, a contradiction contained in the female role. female wage labour is not synonymous with male wage labourj the former's economic position as domestic labourers has transformed their economic position as wage labourers. their increased proletarianization has not eliminated the gap between female and male workers. it is a question again of the specific oppression of women: this is an issue which is not dealt with by merely recognizing that women serve two roles. the key is to see the integration of these two roles, and the contradiction that integration poses for women. female labour is both privatized and socialised: she is both a domestic and an industrial unit. her status as worker reduces her isolation, but has done nothing to reduce the oppression of her privatized labour at home. her domination within the family is controlled by the male worker. granted, it was originally based on his relation to the means of production, but it has been maintained, even with the entry of women into industry. the solution is to look for the interplay of this dual role of women, a situation which has given rise to a tension between the productive sphere and the reproductive sphere. women are positioned historically in the center of this dialectic, and with advanced capitalism the opposing forces of production and reproduction have posed contradictions for women which demand a resolution. if one can isolate these 150 contradictions, then perhaps one can build a base for a successful feminist movement. the women's work study group (1976) has argued that these contradictions do in fact reflect "stress points" in the capitalist system. one needs to examine the historical emergence of these contradictions and the changing nature of the productive and reproductive spheres. i will ' briefly discuss three historical phases and the impact the changing roles of production and reproduction has had on the position of women. the historical phases are the stages of precapitalism, industrialization, and monopoly capitalism. in precapitalist societies, the family was the major productive unit in the economy. the female performed tha tasks of the rpproductive sphere (reproduction, health care, laundry, and so on), as well as the tasks associated with the material production of necessities. production was generally for immediate consumption, but also involved the market exchange of goods. there was a sexual division of labor at work, both categories of sexually divided tasks being regarded as valuable and socially necessary. moreover, both forms of labour were performed within the family unit. in fact, one could say that the productive and reproductive spheres maintained a symbiotic relationship, in that each sphere was dependent to a great extent on the labour which occured within the other sphere (bridenthal, 1976:5). it is only with capitalism that material production, organized socially in the form of wage labour, 151 became seperated from the reproductive tasks within the family. with this seperation of production and reproduction, the family relinquished its economic functions, and the household was devalued in terms of its socio-economic contribution. it was devalued precisely because it became isolated from the socialized production of surplus value. in the nineteenth century, with the rise of industry, commodity production shifted increasingly to the factory system. the shift fundementally altered the position of women. it shifted the nature of demand from skilled workers to low wage unskilled workers who could perform the tasks of running the machines. since physical strength was no longer as important a variable for this task, women were increasingly brought in as a cheap and readily available source of unskilled labour. however, the increased entry of women posed a serious threat to the bargainning position of the skilled male worker. it waa during this period that the ideology of the family unit was transformed. the focus shifted from its value as a productive unit to its value as an institution for securing personal happiness and fulfillment (zaretsky, 1976:^7-57). females were regarded as the key figures in that unit, thereby reinforcing motherhood as the feminine ideal. at the same time, the ideology defined the labour undertaken by women in this sphere as economically unproductive. such an ideology served two purposes. first, by upholding motherhood and the household as the "natural" and "true" position of women, the male worker 152 was able to restrict the entry of a large number of women into the labour market. at the same time, capital's needs were met. for those women who could not afford the "luxury" of remaining in the home, their ideological position as unproductive domestic labourers left them in a weak bargaining position upon entry into socialized production. capitalists were then able to maintain a cheap supply of labour, which could be easily laid off during economic recessions. women workers are the first to go when jobs are scarce. part of this is due to the ideology that a male worker has a family to support, whereas a female probably has a husband to support her. the sexist ideology of this period crossed classboundaries as well. whereas the vote was extended to all white men, regardless of social position, in the mid 1800's in north america, women , regardless of their economic standing, were refused the franchise (women's work study group, 1976:31). the increasing socialization of production, and its seperation from the more privatized reproductive sphere posed visible contradictions for women in this period. female workers were doubly exploited, both as domestic and as wage labourers, while bourgeois women were increasingly isolated in their separate sphere. the result was an upsurge of feminist protest. as zaretsky notes, the protest took two forms. first, the bourgeois women organized a protest against the enforced idleness of their domestic lives, and demanded access to middle class occupations. protest from working class women was focused 153 on a call for reforms in the industrial sphere so as to lessen the hardships of their working position (zaretsky, 1973s 37). unfortunately, both movements placed their hopes solely on the granting of the franchise; they assumed that contradictions could be resolved through legal means. as they quickly came to realize, this was not the case. the oppression of women was too integrally connected to the specific mode of production. the monopoly phase of capitalism which began to emerge in the early twentieth century is characterized by several developments: an increasing concentration of capital, a shift away from labour intensive industry, and a rise in profit rates which is accompanied by a need to maintain high consumption rates. it is a period marked by a rise in wages, which is controlled for by capitalists by a corresponding rise in commodity prices (see braverman, 197*0. furthermore, monopoly capitalists reorganized corporate facilities to spread the ideology of consumerism, and thereby ensure a market for their commodities. the family unit took on a new value for capital as a market for products. with increasingly sophisticated forces of production and ideological manipulation at their control, capitalists were able to cultivate that family market through an ideology of mass consumption. a cheap yet educated work force was required to perform the task of marketing the increasing mass of commodities. the result was a rapidly expanding white collar sector for which women provided an ideal source of labour. however, the rising expectations imposed by mass 15* consumerism often could not be met by a single wage earner in the family unit. to facilitate the entry of married women into the work force, the technology of capitalism produced new labour saving devices (automatic washers, dryers, freezers, tv dinners, and so on) which decreased the time spent on household tasks. these devices undoubtedly have had an impact on domestic labour; at the same time there has been a qualitative expansion of woman's work. due to the increased emphasis on consumption and standard of living, women have had more tasks to perform. her responsibilities in the reproductive sphere were not reduced: if anything, they were redefined in order to widen their scope. women now have to be child psychologists, aware consumers, and "efficient" housekeepers. what has occurred with monopoly capitalism is the development of a larger group of women who are engaged in labour in both the productive and reproductive spheres. women have entered the productive sphere largely in work tasks which are part of the reproductive sphere (i.e., teaching, nursing, social work, domestic service sectors). bridenthal argues quite convincingly that this phenomenon is indicative of an increasing shift of the mode of reproduction from the personal to the public forum (1976«6-8). while the labour within the family remains privatized, decisions and policy concerning the form and use of that labour are no longer in the woman's control. bridenthal 's discussion focuses on the increasing intervention of the capitalist system 155 into the reproductive sphere in order to ensure the control of the reproduction of the labour force. the increased entry of the female into socialized production transformed the area of reproductive labour. this in turn threatens the maintenance of the specific mode of production unless the former is controlled by capital. in other words, capital must on the one hand maintain the stability of the nuclear family (to ensure the personal happiness of the worker and obscure his alienation on the job), and on the other hand, it requires women as an available source of reserve labour. the structural contradiction of these needs has left women in advanced capitalism both socialized and privatized in their labour; both waged and unwaged. the contradictory nature of capitalist ideology becomes only too evident. the family unit is portrayed as a separate entity from the economic sphere. but in fact, the household as a productive and consumptive unit is integrally tied to certain economic needs of the system. the myth of the family as independent of the productive sphere is necessary if society is to maintain the notion that the personal life of the worker has an entirely self controlled meaning. because the family is organized around reproduction and consumption however, it is impossible to speak of family organization without considering the labour needs of capital. as already noted, monopoly capital relies on high rates of consumption and high commodity prices. these needs, in turn, force women into the work force 156 on an increasingly permanent basis in order to maintain the standard of living demanded by mass consumerism. this poses a challenge to the traditional position of the male as the wage earner, and to the authority that position has given him over the female. the result is an erosion of the traditional ideology of the family unit, though the demand by capital for such a unit remains. this is not to say that capital has reorganized its sexist ideology. on the contrary, it is reproduced as long as women receive lower wages and are concentrated in low-skilled occupations. however the transformation in the reproductive sphere (it is becoming less and less the primary position for women as greater numbers join the work force) makes visible the need for a transformation in the productive sphere. women are now both regular participants in the wage labour force and in the domestic labour force, yet still the ideology defines them in terms of housewives and mothers. the tension and contradiction inherent in their dual role is masked by a false separation of the two spheres. capital has mystified the place of women within capitalist production. it thus becomes the task of a revolutionary movement to "demystify" their position, and organize on the basis of an understanding of both spheres of female labour. 157 references braverman, harry 197^ labor and monopoly capital. new york: monthly review press. bridenthal, renate 1976 "the dialectics of reproduction and production in history." radical america 10 ( march-april ) . mitchell, juliet 1966 "women: the longest revolution." new left review uo(november-december) . seccombe, wallace 1973 "the housev/ife and her labour under capitalism. new left review 83( january-february) . women's work study group 1976 "loom, broom and womb: producers, maintainers and reproducers." radical america 10(marchapril) . zaretsky, eli 1973 "capitalism, the family and personal life." socialist revolution, 1 3lk{ january-april) , and 1 5 ( may-june ) . commentary indigenous women and capitalist exploitation: ron bourgeault replies to jesse russell what follows is a response to jesse russell's commentary in alternate routes, vol.7 on my article "the development of capitalism and the subjugation of native women in northern canada'" (ar, vol.6). i hope that this response will lead to an ongoing discussion, which would be useful in addressing certain "myths" that are constantly perpetrated against indigenous (indian and metis) people. i would like to begin by stating why i wrote the article and then address russell's criticisms of my approach to culture and class. the article was written in response to a heated discussion between myself and a "white" feminist at a "third world" benefit in ottawa. the discussion centred on indian women and the indian act. i argued then and continue to argue that the "dominant" white women's movement has to go beyond simple criticism of the indian act as obviously sexist legislation when dealing with aboriginal women. to dwell only on the indian act is too convenient and too liberal. the realities facing aboriginal women today (race, sex and class oppression) far exceeded the politics of the indian act. this reality is predicated on the fact that the subjugation of indigenous women has occurred in a manner unlike that of white women, and the indian act serves only to exacerbate historic differences between indian and metis women. the white women's movement has not 144 really made an attempt to understand how indigenous women have become oppressed, and especially to understand the nature of the similarities and differences which exist between themselves and other women. recognizing that class differences do exist between women, manifest themselves within the women's movement and, at the same time, influence feminism as an ideology, i suggest that aboriginal women (the majority of whom are working class) align themselves with white working class women on the basis that they do have a great deal in common. russell, in her critique of my paper and position, focuses on two points. first, according to russell, i advocate that indigenous women would benefit from participation i_n the white feminist movement. she adds that to do so would assimilate aboriginal women into white culture, claiming that i advocate assimilation as a solution to the problems of indigenous women. second, russell says that i argue the feminist movement should be a working-class movement that would echo the struggles of indigenous women. concerning the first point, russell states that aboriginal women are not ready to participate in the white women's movement primarily because of profound cultural differences. whites, according to russell, are homo-centric, which means they are divorced from nature and possess a world view based on individualism. indians, on the other hand, are eco-centric. they live in harmony with nature and are not individualistic. on the second point, russell maintains that the feminist movement does not seek class-based solutions. finally, 145 russell contends that i portray indian women as apathetic, ignorant, and physically unaggressive. in response i would first like to restate my argument, and then reply to russell's major points of criticism. at the outset i would like to say that russell has read opinions into my article that are absolutely not there. since the 1600's northern indians have been drawn into and deeply involved in capitalism as a system, which means their social organization, and culture, has been seriously altered over the centuries. capitalism was imposed through colonial relations of domination. that is, there was the imposition of foreign cultural, social, economic and political relations and institutions for the express purpose of exploitation. accordingly, the subjugation of indian women, and later metis women, is external in its origin and directly linked to the expansion of european capitalism. today, women's oppression is a world-wide condition of the development and expansion of capitalism as a system, but with marked material differences between the developed and underdeveloped world. nevertheless, women world-wide are all victims of the same system. in canada indigenous and white women meet in the same society under similar, but specific, conditions. white women can trace the roots of their oppression to the initial stages of capitalism in europe. indian and metis women owe their subjugation to capitalism and its socio-economic structure as it unfolded in what is now north america. the main points of my article are the following: 146 1. the hunting-gathering (communal) societies of the north were in general egalitarian, which means indian women held autonomy over their lives in terms of what they produced and distributed within the gender division of labour. 2. capitalism, in the form of the fur trade, required that indian societies be drastically altered so that production and exchange of the commodity fur could be undertaken. 3. the destruction of communalism meant the destruction of the communal family and the autonomy of indian women. this destruction was a lengthy process associated with the development and expansion of capitalism. 4. the destruction of communalism was predicated on capital gaining access to and control over indian labour for the purpose of exploitation. 5. the destruction of communal society could not be accomplished by imposing exploitative relationships just on indian men, but required the destruction of indian women's autonomous role within the respective communal societies. indian men were caused to interfere with and later to dominate the labour tasks of indian women. in short, indian society was dominated, and in turn indian men were caused to dominate indian women. 6. as relations of exploitation were imposed, and continued to develop, northern indians (women and men) were drawn into a class society and the international division of labour (capitalism as a world system). the mercha destroying production ) labour-powe indian's co labour-powe became a f exploited . traditional perpetuatio distorted a nt bourgeoisi indian "cult their fu " in the ntinued subsis r to be obt acilitating me what appe indian soci n of pre-capi nd altered for was not interested in totally ure" (pre-capitalist relations of ndamental interest was in "cheap ommodity production of fur. the tence from the land allowed their ained cheaply. natural subsistence chanism by which indian labour was ars to be the continuation of ety (culture) is in fact the talist relations of production in a m for the purpose of exploitation. indian women were caused to be exploited as support labour for indian men, with the imposition of capitalist relations on their society by europeans. also, with the imposition of dependent relationships on european men, indian women were exploited both sexually and as support labour. the birth of the half-breed stands as a direct symbol of the subjugation of the indian and the sexual exploitation of indian women. 147 9. the labour of indian and metis women, and men, has been exploited over the centuries in different capacities by different forms of capital. the breakdown of pre-capitalist relations has culminated, in the present period of imperialism, in their incorporation into the universal wage labour force. presently, as historically, the majority of indian and metis women are members of the working class. it must be acknowledged, however, that there is a racial and gender division of labour today that manifests itself in the marg inal izat ion and under-employment of indian and metis women . now, i will return to russell's criticism and her insinuation that i am naive. to suggest that i was advocating assimilation as a solution to indigenous women's problems is in fact her own misinterpretation and misconception of what i was saying. what i suggested was a semi-autonomous alliance between working-class indigenous women, and working-class white women on the basis of their common interests, so that they can deal more effectively with what divides them. i should add that such an alliance should also include ethnic and immigrant women. class, race and gender divisions have been intentionally imposed, viciously and effectively, on people for economic reasons. to call for an alliance between people who are being discriminated against is not advocating assimilation. russell seems to believe that if aboriginal and white people were to have a democratic relationship with each other it would automatically lead to the assimilation of aboriginals into "white society". such a conclusion is not only superficial, it is also irresponsible. besides, i do not believe aboriginals are being assimilated into "white" canadian society. assimilation cannot take place so long as there are serious divisions based on race. 148 1 would argue instead that, since the second world war, there has been a process of homogeni zat ion of people through the universal izat ion of the wage-labour market. in canada, since wwii, indian and metis men and women have been drawn into the wage-labour market, but without proportional jobs. in this sense, the capitalist socialization process is becoming complete, but with inequalities. concerning culture, i do not believe that what separates indigenous and white people today is a question of cultural differences, including the illusion of different "mind sets". what separates indigenous and white women today is historicallybased differences in the nature of their oppression. aboriginal women are subject to racism and national oppression. this is not the case for white women. it is important to note that racism operates in the women's movement, as a broad movement, just as it operates in the trade-union movement. in the women's movement, middle-class women are only interested in seeing aboriginal women as "our sisters in culture". i do not believe culturalism to be the case with working-class women. racism and its institutionalization, including a racial division of labour, which is more obvious and distinct in some areas of the country than in others, is dividing people, especially the broad working class . to simply ascribe cultural difference to indigenous women is nothing more than a poor excuse to prevent understanding of the historic and current basis for their oppression. in a society 149 where racism is very profound, russell would do well to understand the differences between culturalism and racialism, since the former is often used to justify the latter. what russell alludes to in terms of culture and living in harmony with nature, albeit rationalized as indianness, is a current misrepresentation of communalism. culture must be seen in terms of present material reality. indian culture today is not the homogeneous and autonomous culture which existed as an expression of communalism. communalism is dead . class and exploitation are alive. now, before i am misinterpreted again, i am not advocating the total destruction of culture to be replaced by assimilation. indian culture, and metis for that matter, must be liberated from the conditions of its distortion, just as the people must be liberated from the conditions of their oppression and explo i tat ion . my response to russell's second point of criticism will be brief, since part of my response is contained in the above reply. russell contends that the feminist movement does not contain class struggle. i think that close examination will show there are differences in the conditions and issues affecting working class women and middle class women, although gender (and race) discrimination and oppression does cut across class lines. women are not a class unto themselves but, at the same time, they are not classless. women belong to classes. the women's movement does have as its basis class, and feminism as an ideology is 150 influenced by class. there is a great deal of information which shows that indigenous women, for over three hundred years, nave been involved in and exploited through class relationships. all classes have a tendency to see the world in their own image, t.ne middle class being no exception. perhaps this is why russell sees cultural differences being a reason for not having relationships between indigenous and white working-class women, and views the white feminist movement as being a coalition of individual women against sexist discrimination and oppression. i agree with elanor leacock when she states that the women's movement has historically been middle-class and oriented toward parity with middle-class men in the capitalist system. i think russell has been caught by these contradictions, which operate in the women's movement. i anticipate that, in the future, workingclass women of all races will exert themselves and establish' hegemony over the women's movement, and direct it towards the transformation of the system. in response to russell's final point of criticism, i admit i did not deal explicitly with the resistance of indian women to the conquest. the intention of the article was to show how class, race and gender relationships were created in the early period of capitalism. i agree with russell that indian women have not been, at any time, passive. as i stated above, communal society could not be conquered without destroying women's role within their respective societies. in other words, there were systematic acts of aggression directed against indian women in 151 order to destroy communal 1 sm . i think that russell's criticism is more applicable to arthur ray, sylvia \ an kirk and jennifer brown, who portray indians (women and men i as succumbing to the exigencies of trade, with the passive acceptance of material dependency ( economi sm ) . i repeat, indian women were not passive, and to portray their resistance in terms of assimilation is e rroneous . if debate arises at all from this exchange, i would prefer to see it directed at how class, race and gender divisions have been created as a consequence (dialectical outgrowth) of the development and expansion of capitalism globally. i am posing this position against what i consider to be the eurocentrist nature of western feminism, which assumes the subjugation of women to be universal, based on the manner in which it occurred within western capitalism, and not as a consequence of the global spread of capitalism. i think any debate based on cultural differences addressed to inequalities is fruitless. 152 book review: first as tragedy then as farc | 279 book review first as tragedy then as farce by slavoj žižek, london, united kingdom: verso press, 2009. $12.95 u.s paper. isbn 978-1-84467-2. pages 1-157 reviewed by: aaron henry1 the best way into this review is to start with slavoj žižek’s opening premise of first as tragedy than as farce: liberalism has died twice in the 21st century. following 9/11, the retrenchment of democratic rights, the construction of new models of containment and exclusion marked the death of liberalisms promised “liberal-democratic political utopia”. the 2008 economic meltdown further revealed that prosperity, contrary to the claims of neoliberal ideologues, could not be delivered through free market mechanisms. as such, using “ the ongoing crisis as a starting point” (5) žižek asks the following: how does ideology function to maintain capitalism as the only option when the inherent irrationality and authoritarian tendencies in the system have been unmasked by liberalisms failures as political and economic ideology? žižek ’s diagnosis is this: the death of liberal ideology leaves us with no other belief, no other imagination of our social bonds other than the non-ideological. this non-ideology maintains or exists in capitalist society through a very cynical functioning, “we only imagine that we do not really believe in our ideology”which makes it all the more pervasive (3). as such, perception, action and, therein what is politically possible, are now structured by the other of ideologynon-ideology; and, thus, non-ideology is itself the ruling ideology. the logical question that follows is how does an ideology that is constituted by the fact that we imagine that we do not really believe in it, function and how does it function differently from its twin-form, ideology? the entire first half the book is devoted to this question. at a glance, this non-ideology is in many ways more of less consistent with how ‘ideology’ functions regularly in marxist thought (i.e. it normalizes the status quo by positing that existing institutions and relations are directly analogous to human nature or de-historicizes the existence of the 1  aaron henry is a ph.d. candidate at the department of sociology and anthropology, carleton university (ottawa, canada). 280 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times established order ) the departure, however, is in the specific role nonideology and the suppression of the possibility of alternatives within a given historical moment. ideology suppresses the “possibility immanent to the situation”: it does this not by fighting actual political opponents but by closing down the “possibility (the utopian revolutionary-emancipatory potential) which is immanent to the situation” (27). žižek argues that in the 2008 economic crisis this suppression was made through a number of interventions ranging from pope benedict’s claim “that all is vanity” to jacques alain-miller’s assertion that things must be terrible but eventually trust in the monetary system would be restoredby an all ‘knowing subject’ (28). it is tempting to level the critique that the suppression of immanent possibilities is not unique to our current moment of capitalist society. after-all, voltaire’s candide character professor pangloss’s declaration that “this is the best of all possible worlds” seems to be jib at this very function of ideology. there is a subtle difference though. the idea of the current order being the best of all possible world’s and the idea that things are ‘bad but are the least bad’ do both serve to suppress the possibility of an alternative. however, where the former functions through a utopian optimismthere is nothing better than capitalismthe latter operates through a disavowal of its own cynicism of the existing order (i.e the existing order of relations are broken, miserable and destructive and we no longer believe in this order; and yet things will only be worse without it). žižek is, arguably, quite convincing here about this shift to cynical suppression of alternatives. after-all was this not the sort of reflex-action behind the financial bail-outs contained within the sentiment, ‘the global economy is broken but what can we really do but save it?’ the argument gets somewhat reductive, however, as žižek traces the function of cynicism of non-ideology into working class and liberal bourgeois forms of consciousness, in the forms of fundamental populism and permissive cynicism, respectively. žižek argues that the bourgeois liberal (largely in the form of social democrat) clings to the ‘symptom’ of the repressed truth of the existing order whereas the working class subject fetishizes some other relation in place of the direct truth of its relations. put concisely, žižek argues that permissive-cynicism functions insofar as the subject is not aware of the content that belies the form of its initial claim (68). the liberal, for instance, may claim, “i believe everyone has equal opportunity” but they make this claim as something guaranteed by the political sphere; and, thus, the subject here book review: first as tragedy then as farc | 281 overlooks the unjust social relations that actually underpin the political sphere they articulate their belief of ‘equality’ through (see marx’s “on the jewish question”). in this sense, the political sphere, operates within this form of consciousness as the content (the materiality of the right to equal opportunity) when in fact it is nothing more than the symptom (one could use the word abstraction) of actual existing social relations that are in fact unequal. populist-fundamentalism, in contrast, operates through a fetishization of something in place of the immediate antagonistic relations one confronts (e.g when canadians say they worry about immigrants taking all of the jobs, the immigrant is standing in place of capital, de-industrialization and outsourcing etc). for žižek, the point of this comparison of the different class relations attached to symptom and fetishism seems to be this: the permissive-cynical subject is the easier of the class positions to mobilize because the form of the subjects ideological belief (i.e equality) can be recognized to be rooted in its content (i.e unequal relations) and as such the subject can simply integrate the content further into the form (i.e we will not be equal politically until we transform our economic relations therefore, let’s change economic relations). conversely, the populist fundamentalist must be told that what they take as the truth of their relations is in itself untrue (e.g. your ‘enemy’ is not the immigrant but capital). the paradox is that the opposing class position (liberal bourgeois thinkers) is easier to demystify and mobilize than those who ‘the left’ is actually suppose to support, workers and the down-trodden (68). in this sense, žižek attempts here, using lacanian psychoanalysis, an indirect answer to the infamous question that has occupied marxism since the 20th century: why has their not been a working class revolution? i think there are two questions though that arise with žižek’s explanation. first, and most importantly, i think the idea that fundamental populism can be simply characterized as a movement that puts the fetishized object in place of the real relations it encounters misses the mark on why the ‘second death of liberalism’, the opening premise of the book, is potentially so dangerous. the death of liberalism has created the opportunity for social forces, previously discredited or marginalized in liberal society, to provide a new narrative on the economy. in particular, take the british national party (bnp) in the england, this is a perfect example of a fundamentalist-populist force insofar as the bnp pledges to defend working class england from immigrants and ‘islamization’ and, thus, obscures real exploitative social relations in english society. however, this movement has also critiqued, no doubt with anti-semitic under282 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times tones, the bailouts to the big banks and the power of london’s financial sector. the point being, žižek’s analysis seems to suggest fundamentalpopulism simply functions by putting false objects in place of actual relations, the problem though, as gramsci noted long ago, is that right wing ideology does not simply displace ‘true’ relations with ‘false’ relations; rather, it combines them so that one cannot tell one from the other; and, as such, common sense, the mainstay of fascist ideology, always contains some kernel of good sense; thus, common sense contains some form of truth (gramsci, 2007, 329). in this sense, the problem with fundamental populism is not merely that one displaces the truth of relations with fetishisms but that real relations can be represented (i.e. big bail outs, the privilege of finance capital over labour) and articulated alongside false objects. arguably, with the death of liberalism is not only that of cynicism but that one now has a situation where a dissatisfaction with the actual relations in liberalism is not only possible to articulate but can be articulated by social forces that liberalism as an ideology previously maligned or discredited; such movements do not displace discontent with real relations with false objects, they merge them. second, if we buy žižek’s analysis of fundamental-populism and the cynical permissive subject, we are left with the following question: if the working class is locked in its own modes of populist fetishisms and increasingly we are trapped within the political and economic systems of capitalist society precisely because we imagine we do not believe in them, and thus continually reaffirm them in our actions, how are we to overthrow the system? while zizek does directly confront the paradox he has constructed around the difficulty of mobilizing the working class his answer is “fidelity to the communist idea” (97). in particular, for žižek the communist idea is understood here as eternal idea (one that pivots around the ending the injustice relations between the included and excluded) that needs to be reinvented in each historical period. žižek argues that in our present day we have four main antagonisms which despite being integral to the reproduction of capital are at the same-time the sites of possible disruption to its functioning: ecological catastrophe, “private property in relation to so-called intellectual property”, the science of bio-genetics and “new forms of apartheid, new walls and slums” (91). for žižek, the relations between excluded and included are fundamentally different from the other antagonisms in that the latter are issues of human survival that can be resolved “through authoritarian measures which will simply intensify existing social hierarchies, divisions and exclusions” (98). as such, book review: first as tragedy then as farc | 283 the relation of exclusion and inclusion will not just be unresolved by the measures but the relation itself will become the dominant mode of social control. the antagonism of exclusion and inclusion, in contrast, is a relation of justice or rather the injustice of the human condition in its current form; and, as such, because the relation is a question of justice rather than the survival of the species, it is the only antagonism “that justifies the use of the term communism” (96). as such, žižek makes the case that we should in fact be wary of ‘progressive’ political projects that attempt to overcome these antagonisms from a vantage point that does not take the relation of the injustice of exclusion and inclusion as its fundamental starting point. in this regards, žižek targets the ‘progressive’ environmental movements that treat the environment as something akin to the christian tale of the fall from eden, with simply the industrial revolution sitting in the place of original sin as the event in which we lost our “roots to mother earth”, a relationship that must be restored through a deification of nature and the disavowal of modern technology (97). in addition to this he also casts doubt on the maoist perspective as these approaches have a tendency to “attack the modern subjectivity” as it is understood in western political thought and society. while these may seem like disparate progressive movements to target, they are united, for žižek, by the fact that both movements actually destroy the possibility of the communist ideal insofar as the former seeks to abolish the technical productive forces wrought by the industrial revolution, while the latter calls into question the very notions of freedom capable of harnessing the technological forces of capitalism for a project of human emancipation. in this sense, neither project has the capacity to come to terms with the social conditions produced by capitalist society let alone to posit how very possibilities inherent to these conditions could be used to establish an order outside capital. this critique is made quite apparent in žižek’s discussion of the hegelian mode of subtraction from the situation as the mode of praxis the ‘left’ must adopt. in particular, subtraction here is meant to operate simultaneously on three dimensions: withdrawal from a situation in such a way that the relations sustaining the situation itself are exposed so as to see their points of contact (the minimal difference between them) and thus, in exposing these relations, to disintegrate the situation itself (129). such a process is stillborn without the modern subjectivity insofar as the modern subjectivity posits the critical distance between itself as a reasoning being and the relations of the existing order (benjamin’s notion 284 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times of the ‘stilled present2). in other words, to withdraw from the situation, which is in itself to presuppose the possibility of critical distance from the situation itself, is to see the situation as something external to one’s own social being. as such, then, subtraction from the situation, a process that requires the critical reflection of the modern subjectivity, reveals the fundamental antagonism of included/excluded, which alone presents the context to reinvent communism in our historical period. so in the end what are we to make of all this? while žižek weaves together starbuck’s ads, hotel policy on smoking and export processing zones into an impressive analysis of ideology, one cannot help that the question of the nature of ideology in first as tragedy then as farce is only partially examined. indeed, while žižek uses psychoanalysis to try to come to terms with the consciousness of the subject in capitalist society, at times, given that zizek has introduced his concept of nonideology in his previous works, it is hard pinpoint what is unique about ideology in capitalist society following the economic death of liberalism. moreover, the discussion of the working class as a subject that has fallen under the sway of fundamental-populism simply fetishizing false objects is one dimensional and, subsequently, overlooks the complex relations between truth and false objects, the power of the latter arguably needs to be considered in terms of the degree to which ideology allows it to reconcile, rather than displace, itself to the former. in this sense, žižek delivers an important analysis of ideology in capitalist society, whether this analysis comes to grips with our current situation, however, is another question. references: benjamin, walter. (1968). “theses on the philosophy of history.” in hannah arendt, trans. harry zohn. (ed.), illuminations. new york: schocken books. gramsci, antonio. (2007). “philosophy, common sense, language and folklore.” in david forgacs (ed.), the antonio gramsci reader, selected writings 1916-1935. new york: lawrance and wishart. 2  as benjamin states in theses on the philosophy of history, “a historical materialist cannot do without the notion of a present which is not a transition, but in which time stands still and has come to a stop” (1968, p. 265). book review: rosa luxemburg: ideas in action | 261 book review rosa luxemburg: ideas in action by paul frölich, translated by johanna hoornweg. chicago, illinois: haymarket books, 2010. $18 u.s., paper. isbn 97-1-60846-074-8. pages: 1-311. reviewed by tiffany hall1 rosa luxemburg: ideas in action is the intellectual biography of rosa luxemburg and her role in socialist party movements in poland, russia, and germany at the turn of the 20th century. author paul frolich sketches a portrait of a woman who greatly shaped the composition and direction of socialist ideology. the author was himself once a member of the german socialist democratic party and, like luxemburg, was a founding member of the german communist party. these positions allowed for an intimate relationship with luxemburg, giving him access to her incredible character before she died. frölich combines what few writings of luxemburg still exist with other personal and political writings from other party members during that time. by doing so, he constructs a vivid account of luxemburg’s progression through the socialist party system up until her murder in january of 1919. while reading frölich’s book it becomes questionable whether he should have created two separate pieces instead of one: only chapters one and ten speak specifically to luxemburg’s personality and life in a biographical manner. the other chapters, which make up a substantial part of the book, alternatively may have been presented as a history of the socialist party. several chapters are more focused on the relationships between luxemburg, kautsky, mehring, and liebknecth, party members and writers who worked closely with luxemburg and held key positions in the party, and many chapters describe the intricate details large events, such as the russian revolution and the first world war. yet there are few mentions of clara zetkin, who was known to be luxemburg’s most intimate friend. frölich’s decision to create the book as it appears is a testament to the dedication of luxemburg to the socialist cause; separating the two would be disingenuous. thus, those looking specifically for information on luxemburg the individual may be slightly disappointed; her life was too much a part of politics to ignore 1 tiffany hall is an ma candidate in sociology and anthropology at carleton university, ottawa. 262 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism any of her political endeavors in attempting to understand the person she was. for this reason, the book is a much more substantial contribution to understanding the creation and progression of the socialist party. due to her role in the changing nature of the party, luxemburg could not help but have a heavy presence in the discussion of party politics. frölich’s strongest aspect is his detailing of the progression of socialist ideas and movement during the most intense times. for instance, the chapter on the outbreak of the first world war is a substantial contribution to the understanding of the socialist position in germany and prussia at the time. frölich integrates aspects from luxemburg’s writing for pamphlets and articles to highlight the parallels and progression of her ideology. his discussion of her piece the accumulation of capital reveals luxemburg’s process in her own understanding of marxism. he describes the effect it had on understanding imperialism and capitalism and how it changed the approach of the party toward policies for the working class. although the entirety of the book is informative and succinct, the real beauty of frölich’s writing as an author comes to fruition during the last two chapters of the book; the final two months of the german revolution leading up to luxemburg’s murder. frölich describes the creation of the “spartakusbund” and provides many excerpts from the rote fahne, the journal in which luxemburg would write for the final time. frölich points to this time period as the clearest indication of a direct extension of karl marx’s ideas, particularly the communist manifesto. this adds greater emphasis on the importance of luxemburg and her socialist advocacy within historical marxism. in final chapter, frölich reveals the little known facts about luxemburg’s life and character, as well as provides his own opinion on the events leading to her death. the strength of the counter-revolution is seen by frölich as a ‘diabolical plan’ in which luxemburg and her spartans were deliberately dismantled through political guises. frölich’s witness of the decline in mental health following her weakening physical state provides enough speculation for him to ask whether luxemburg was the great leader they believed her to be: “…did her physical strength simply not suffice for the necessary tasks, or did this great leader, who as a theoretician and as a strategist of class struggle moved ahead with such unshakeable inner strength and tenacity, lack that crowning touch of the party leader who can make realistically sound judgments at critical moments irrespective of his mood book review: rosa luxemburg: ideas in action | 263 and who knows how to see to it that his decisions are carried out that crowning touch which became lenin’s second nature. this question, of course, can never be answered” (p.293). frölich’s question is somewhat sorrowful, as he acknowledges that the events led to the rise of the counter-revolution, and to the eventual rise to power of hitler in 1933. overall, frölich’s piece allows for an extensive yet clear description of the creation of the socialist party in prussia, russia, and germany at the turn of the 20th century. this newly translated edition provides greater detail of luxemburg’s life as well as excerpts from her most influential writings, particularly those that had great impact on the socialist party. frölich’s book provides a significant contribution to understanding the progression of the socialist party and, more importantly, to understanding the role luxemburg had in advocating for socialism and the power of the working class. frölich’s book is an important historical contribution to marxist literature and an important tool for understanding past socialist ideologies and the current political landscape. alternate editorial board: dan gl alternate routes is an a dents in socio, unicatic department subscript: ; | the unite payable to alternate rou' copyright, 1976, alternate routes, unless o vol. 1 contents i977 macrosociological approaches toward a 1 'canadian sociology' wallace clement the dominion government as gatekeeper to the 38 canadian ethnic mosaic, the case of quebec, 1867-1885 dan glenday embourgeoisement or proletarianization? 58 stan marshall social mobility: current thrusts (and non87 thrusts) :a critical approach to the analysis of mobility jan mayer toward a marxist theory of transition 103 chuck smith commentary class analysis and technological determinism 131 ken campbell implications of the domestic role of women 1^2 eileen saunders editorial statement this, is the first issue of a canadian graduate students journal dedicated to the dissemination of theoretical and empirical problems in the disciplines of sociology and anthropology. we have had to rely on our colleagues within the carleton university community due, in part, to our feeling of isolation from other centers of intellectual activity in canada. i believe it can be safely said that we, here at carleton, are not alone in this perception. we hope the publication of this journal will help to 'break the ice"* and in the years to cone contribute to a dialogue between our friends and colleagues, not only in the province of ontario but throughout canada. isbn 0-7709-0012-7 macrosociological approaches toward a 'canadian sociology ' * wallace clement there is an element of truth to the analogy between the blind men and an elephant and the sociologist and a society. this paper is no more than an attempt to move toward a wider perspective, a macrosociological approach to canadian society, by examining some models and theories of modern national societies. it attempts to contribute to the development of what will be called a 'canadian sociology' approach. as a topic of substantive inquiry, canading society needs to be informed by many disciplines, encompassing history, economics, political science (or more generally political economy), social pyschol°gy» social geography, anthropology and sociology. because of its breadth the latter seems suited, more than the others, to encompass each of these disciplines— at least potentially it can. there is little evidence of a general movement in englishspeaking canada toward a 'canadian sociology' approach in the sense of a holistic analysis generated from an understanding of distinctive characteristics, relations and patterns within canada. many approaches have been 'imported', largely by way of the united states, using canada simply as another data source or experimental situation without developing a national society perspective. however, in quebec the situation is exceptional since a 'total society' or societe globale viewpoint is common and the analysis has been indigenous to quebec , thus recognizing the obvious: quebec is not a miniature replica of the united states— something english-speaking counterparts often find hard to comprehend for the rest of canada*. levels of analysis following georges gurvitch, guy rocher suggests three classif icatory levels of analysis: the first is the macrosociological plane of total societies, which includes social groups that are sufficiently complete to satisfy all the needs of their members— such as a country, or western civilization. these groups are considered as wholes or units. the •canada's 'two solitudes' are suggested by guy rocher, "it must be recognized that among many differences, canadian sociology separates clearly into two major categories: frenchlanguage sociology and english-language sociology. they are almost airtight entities. two almost impermeable worlds live side by side in almost total, mutual ignorance" (1974:501). ignorance of the societe glohale perspective used by quebec sociologists has impeded others from developing a perspective on canadian society as a whole while quebec sociologists seldom venture into the res* of canada to apply their perspective, maintaining a somewhat understandable but narrowed inward focus. see also claude gousse's, "reflexions sur l'avenir de la sociologie au quebec" in loubser (editor), 1970. second is the plane of partial groupings which form part of total societies, such as the family, lineal groupings, voluntary associations, social classes, and so forth. finally, there is the microsociological plane of different types of social links... the various social relationships which are established between the members of a collectivity and the different ways in which these members are linked to and by the total society (1972:3-4). these are various points of perception for the analyst but are meant to "interpenetrate" and "link" with one another. for rocher, the macrosociological plane is both the place to begin and end; it is the context for all other investigation and the level towards which all investigation is directed (5). the goal is the "total context" or a holistic analysis.* however, rocher's meaning of macrosociology is much more precise than others. usually macrosociology refers to "largescale social systems and patterns of interrelationships within and between these systems, including, for example, national and international forms of social organization" in contrast to microsociology as "the study of small groups".** thus many of the aspects classified by rocher on the second plane are often referred to as macrosociological, serving to impose a very large gap between macro and micro levels without any mediating levels. for this reason the rocher-gurvitch classification is more useful. classif icatory problems are different from analytical ones. to provide an analysis of canadian society it will be necessary to distinguish three types of macrosociological terms. the first may be called 'macrogroupings ' and corresponds to rocher's second plane and what is usually referred to as macrosociology. the other two aim at a holistic perspective and may be referred to as 'total society' and 'national society' approaches. a 'total society' approximates the first plane identified by rocher in the sense that common social and cultural bonds prevail, as exhibited in common identity, values and traditions, usually carried in a common language and organizations which serve to preserve a particular culture. the conditions for a 'total society' are much stronger than those for a 'national society' in terms of the degree of cultural integra•this approach may be contrasted with a social -psychological one like manzer who turns his analysis towards 'human needs' or the microsociological level (1974:5-22). •*these definitions are provided in george and achilles theodorson's modern dictionary of sociology , thomas y. crowell: new york, 1969. tion evident since the latter is delineated simply by territory and legal-political perimeters commonly referred to as a 'state'. in the former, the degree of social integration is much more important in terms of setting 'boundaries' for analysis while in the latter, the extent of integration within states is left problematic. to demonstrate that a 'national society' is at the same time a 'total society', it would be necessary to show that its members share a common identity, common values and traditions and that these members are bounded by a political-legal state which they command. it may be that in some cases the two coincide at particular historical junctures--although it appears this seldom occurs--wh ile in other cases they do not. this distinction is particularly relevant to canada but elsewhere as well.* the primary defining characteristic of macro units is the scale of their implications for the total society and the scope of their inter-relationships within the total social structure. thus, s.z. klausner has adopted the term "total society", to refer to: an ecologically delimited, more or less interdependent set of human collectivities. the student of a total society could inquire into the spatial and/or organizational interdependence of events. he could report the impact of a society's northern upon its southern region, of its army upon its factories, and of its ethnic groups upon its political parties. the term 'total' indicates an intent to consider all of the people in that particular area (1967:3). as this suggests, what is of central importance is the relationships, or as klausner prefers "links", which mediate between various dimensions. as he says, "a model of a 'total society', while recognizing the distinctness of various theoretical levels, must be concerned with statements which link a term on one level with a term on another" (6) . he remarks that many attempts at 'total society' analysis have failed to specify these 'links' between different aspects and levels. these 'mediating mechanisms* are the critical component for models of 'total societies' because they specify how relationships occur and provide direction to correlations. this parallels the •see, for example, jan szczepanski' s , polish society , where he says, "in the years 1795-1918, poland was a nation without statehood, and, because it lacked its own independent political organization, culture constituted the very basis of national existence ....this distinction must always be kept in mind when dealing with eastern and central europe, where the ethnic and cultural areas have never been the same as the political-state demarcations" (1970:4). jews and israel may be a further example. earlier point by rocher but just as with rocher does not distinguish between a 'total' and 'national' society as two distinct ways of delineating tht-perimeters of study. in canada it may be that les quebecois have a 'total society', as may some english-speaking canadians, but les que becois do not have a 'national society' (although some are striving to achieve this); moreover, it may be that for some the english-speaking 'total society' extends beyond canada as a state into the united states and possibly the west as a whole. these are both empirical propositions which could be explored. language is a problem here because in french, nat ion has the connotation given here to 'total society', as in lord durham's famous caricature of "two nations warring in the bosom of a single state".* the tension between the lack of coincidence between a 'total' and 'national' society in quebec has been one of the major motor forces explaining developments in that society and accounts for many of the reasons why quebec sociologists have been so intimately concerned with this issue. however, in the rest of canada a similar problem has also emerged in the for« of nationalism which attempts to identify a distinctiveness vis 1 vis the united states. the native peoples in canada experience a similar dilemma vis a vis the white world, while there are runblings of similar contradictions between western, eastern and central canada. to th cify focus refer socio note indee the n later does pi ica ter-^s devel final e majo the pa is on red to logy, this d d, the at iona in th not ig t ions of th opment ly, in r dist rticul what earli this oes no exter 1 leve e pape norc t of int e impl s. terms of inction in ar level o may be cal er as a 'n being sai t mean tha nal impact 1 and will r . s i m i 1 a he interna ernal phen ications o leve thi f an led atio d, h t th is rec riy. 1 le omen f th is of s pape alysis the na nal so owever e e x t e crucia eive a a foe vel , e on on e nati analy r, it bein t iona ciety . it rnal 1 to good us on ither the n onal sis , is i g pur 1 lev ' app is im level an un deal the in t ation level befo mpor sued el o roac port can ders of nati erms al 1 for re proceeding tant to spehere. the r what w3s h to macroant to be ignored; tandinc of emphasis onal level of the imevel or in internal 'the distinction between 'total' and 'national' society adds a necessary analytical distinction to macrosociological theory. this problem is pointed to by anthony giddens when he says, "the primary unit of sociological analysis, the sociologists' 'society', in this sense, has never been the isolated, 'internally developing' system which has normally been implied in social theory" (1973:264-265). it is only a 'total society' which is really a 'society' in this sense, yet it too must be placed in the context of other societies which compose its environment. the ultimate level of analysis in macrosociology would be the study of a wide range of total societies and national societies. but it will be argued later that a prerequisite to this is a solid base in a number of national society analyses, and particularly here, to develop such an analysis for canada. a 'sociology of canada 1 and a 'canadian sociology* a 'sociology of canada' is restricted to the level of 'macrogroupings ' at best, and at a microsociological level at worst. on the other hand, a 'canadian sociology' attempts to move between the analytical levels of 'national' and 'total' societies, both of which inform the type of analysis being promoted here, and be informed by a holistic perspective. there have been some recent attempts to develop a 'canadian sociology' approach, an analysis of the enterprise as a whole and the formation of canada as a state, but a variety of 'sociology of canada' perspectives continue to dominate; that is, most sociological studies are of individual aspects of canadian society viewed either in isolation or compared with similar phenomenon elsewhere. each approach is important but essentially different. a 'canadian sociology' focuses on major structural features of the country--such as regionalism, ethnic relations, foreign and indigenous investment patterns, political-legal formations and class structures--as they relate in a national context, especially as they unfold and transform historically. 'canadian sociology' is not a theory about canadian society, although it implies a series of models for organizing information, rather, it is a synoptic perspective which conceptually links together a variety of theories and data on canada while making the analyst aware of other factors which may affect or be affected by the particular aspect of society under study. for example, if the subject under study is education, it would be fruitful to know the linkage this has with immigration and the canadian practice of importing highly qualified manpower rather than creating indigenous educational institutions or the linkage between the type of economy canada has and demands this creates for particular training. similarly, it is important to know the type of class structure canada has if education is to be related to class inequalities or the type of sex roles if it is to be related to sexual inequalities. the point is selfevident. the implication being that there emerges from these linkages a broader understanding of various developments by removing them from a narrow view common to a great deal of sociology. similarly, it is concerned about aggregating data on canada into meaningful units of analysis. all that makes it a ' canad ian sociology' perspective as distinct from a 'japanese, american, polish, british, french, australian, russian, etc. sociology' is the substantive focus. this does not mean that various key features such as regionalism, ethnicity, class, etc. will be identical or even similar in each nation. the similarity is that what is being pursued here is simply a specific case of a more general 'national society' perspective. the key is the holistic analysis of a variety of important social phenomenon within a national context. a 'sociology of canada 1 perspective, on the other hand, focuses on particular aspects of the society, such as those listed above or others like education, immigration, sex roles, deviance, voting patterns, urban studies, etc. but does not relate each to other developments within canada. it may compare them with other countries, a la lipset or alford, but is not essentially concerned about the way they combine, emerge and affect one another. if rocher's point about the macrosociological plane being both the place to begin and end is accepted, then the problematic is the extent to which several 'sociologies of canada 1 could be turned into a 'canadian sociology' by transcending individual studies and relating them to one another.* while the individual models and frameworks used in ' soc iolc gies of canada' do not facilitate this end, the information and theories generated may be able to inform a 'canadian sociology'. the idea of a 'canadian sociology' is not based simply on a series of microsociological or macrogrouping studies or even an enumeration of national statistics, but hinges on the relationships and combinations of various elements which crystallize into a unique whole. rather than dealing with each substantive aspect of canadian society discretely, it attempts to tie them into a total framework on the development, structure and operation of the society. a recent book by ronald manzer, canada: a socio-pol i t ical report (1974), will illustrate the distinction being drawn here. although covering a very wide range of topics and providing abundant empirical data on canada, manzer does not organize his analysis or direct himself to the question of a national society, rather, he tends to deal with a wide range of rather specialized topics without attempting to bring them together in a comprehensive national statement in the way, say, john porter did in the vertical mosaic (1965) where he elaborated relations between *as amitai ltzioni metaphorically points out, it may be "that the study of the trivial fruit fly led to the understanding of some general laws of genet ics .... but just as the anatomy of elephants cannot be studied by dissecting fruit flies, so, too, the morphology of macroscopic social units cannot be effectively explored by studying the structure of small groups" (196r:4r). the themes of class, power and ethnicity within the context of canada as a national society. manzer provides a 'sociolocy of canada', porter a 'canadian sociology'. this is not to sav porter produced the complete analysis of canada as a national society; this probably could never be accomplished in one book (and even if possible, it would certainly become dated). for instance, porter focused his analysis of canada on indigenous national elites and tends to by-pass regional differences which a national framework could have paid more attention to, particularly asking why some regions tend not to produce elites or elites of different types. similarly, he had a tendency to bvpass in some senses the external impact on canada and also overlook the historical specificity of some of the many studies recorded in his book. but what he did do was analyse the interaction between class, power and ethnicity as they form canada's social structure and 'the vertical mosaic'. manzer's report, however, has no real theme or theory about the operation or organization of canadian society.* he provides an evaluation based on the ideals of fraternity, equality and liberty, hut not a national society approach which would be addressed to a total set of conditions explaining why these ideals have not been achieved, if indeed, they are the ideals of canadian society. in this paper there is no attempt to provide a sociology of sociology for canada, nor a survey of sociological findincs themselves. rather, the attempt is to examine a series of models and approaches which may prove useful in developing a 'canadian sociology', particularly those which may expand the analysis of canadian society already provided by porter's pathbreaking work and some issues relevant to such an analysis. but first, a larger context is necessary. macrosociology and the 'classical tradition' macrosociology** focuses on structures, types of relationships, and their degree of dependence or independence; in short, how social systems work***. it is in the tradition of sociolo*for example, in a book of well over 300 pages, manzer devotes less than 10 pages to his introduction and conclusion combined, while his first chapter on "human needs and political goods" has only a passing reference to canada. the remainder of the book is devoted to reporting on important statistical comparisons with other countries. **for a recent discussion of macrosociology, see paul f. lazarsfeld's main trends in sociology . harper & row: ny, 1973:22-36. ***c. wright mills provides a series of questions in his sociol og ical imagination which represent some areas a national society approach could explore: "(1) what is the structure of this par8 gists like marx and weber who attempted, in the words of gerth and mills, "to grasp the interrelations on all institutional orders making up a social structure" (1946:49). but what is meant by 'structure'? a social structure is a stable set of relationships among the various parts or elements making up the totality of a society. however, to say these relationships are stable does not discount their continuous transformation. as z.a. jordan has said in his summary of marx, "macro-sociological structures and laws can claim validity only within a specified period of time and, therefore, must be considered historically" (1971:66). "to analytically 'weave' various institutional orders into a whole from the perspective of national societies requires a historical dimension which seeks to comprehend the interactive effects between different orders, their exchanges— both of decision-makers and resources— and their relative strengths or weaknesses vis a vis each other and different orders. for example, someone examining present-day canada may tend to dismiss the religious order in the overall pattern of power but historically it has had_an enormous effect, particularly in ouebec, but elsewhere as well, in helping to shape the current orders. in quebec it could be argued that the church was important in retarding indigenous capitalism but effective in increasing the power of the strte and unions vis a vis capital. the impact of religion thus could be detected only through a historical analysis.* thus the call for a 'canadian sociology 1 is not meant as a replacement for the 'classical tradition'** in sociology; exticular society as a whole? what are its essential components and how are they related to one another? how does it differ from other varieties of social order? within it, what is the meaning of any particular feature for its continuance and for its chance? (2) where does this society stand in human history? what are the mechanics by which it is changing? what is its place within and its meaning for the development of humanity as a whole? how does any particular feature we are examining affect, and how is it affected by, the historical period in which it moves? and this period—what are its essential features? how does it differ from other period? what are its characteristic ways of history-making? (3) what varieties of men and women now prevail in this society and in this period? and what varieties are coming to prevail? in what ways are they selected and formed, liberated and repressed, made sensitive and blunted? what kinds of 'human nature' are revealed in the conduct and character we observe in this society in this period? and what is the meaning for 'human nature' of each and every feature of the society we are examining?" (1959:6-7). •see hubert cuindon's, "the social evolution of quebec reconsidered" (1964: 154ff) . "for an important collection of some major works in the 'classical tradition' of sociology, see c. wright mills (editor), images actly the opposite. it is the application of classical approaches, such as those used by marx and weber, to macrosociological issues of canadian society. it is within the tradition of 'holistic' analysis which maintains that the whole cannot be reconstructed from the parts; the parts can only be understood in light of the whole. rather than a separate focus on theory and methodology, it calls for a reflexive relationship between theorv and research and the development of sociologies at several levels of analysis, especially as the/ relate to one another, including an understanding of the past, toeling for the present and an eye to the future. a 'canadian sociology' approach is consistent with what irving zeitlin sees as the main task of theory construction, 'a problem oriented approach to social science'. he argues th3t, "if one is generally interested in empirical social systems, one ought to have questions a^out thcii workings that one would like to answer. to do this, oie does n< t begin with 'society' in the abstract but with a specific society (or several of them) and with an interesting problem" (1973:23). one major guiding question t^r a 'canadian sociology' already posed is how do major inequalities such as class, regionalism, ethnicity education, occupation, income distribution, foreign control, etc., affect and reinforce one another? of the few national society studies now available, most seem to present their analysis around a particular theme or euidinc value. ralf dahrendorf writes in 'is society and democracy in germany that "the analysis of total societies requires an attempt to relate the structures of mi=ny specific areas of society to an underlying political problem" (1967:ix). he identifies his problem as follows: good analyses of total c ocieties require... a problem that removes all s'. <*tements from the tedious fog of arbitrariness an i provides the whole with a beginning and an end. tocqueville had a problem of this kind: 'democracy , however, we mean something different from tocque\ille, to wit, liberte rather than 6gal ite , a liberal political community rather than an egalitarian society (viii). there need not bei agreement with the particular problem of liberty chosen by darendorf but few would disagree that this is a of man , george braziller: new york (i960], where he says, "classteal sociology contains an enormous variety of conception, value, and method, and its relevance to the life-ways of the individual and to the ways of history-making in our epoch is obvious and immediate. this is why it is central to contemporary cultural work, and among the most valuable legacies of western civilization" (17) 10 macro level problem and an interesting guiding question. in the vertical mosaic , john porter also uses a guiding, theme, that or* inequal i ty , aimed at the image of a 'middle class society'. similar problems are posed by sol encel in his equal ity and authority: a study of class, status and power in aus tralia ! these are also some of! the types of problems which could be posed by a 'canadian soc iology' --problems not constrained by either theory or methodology, but problems which use theories and methodologies to resolve problems. as c. wright mills has said, "for the classical social scientists, neither method nor theory is an autonomous domain; methods are methods for some range of problems; theories are theories for some range of phenomenon" (1959:121).* the first task of the analyst is to provide the macro problem whether these are liberty, equality, democracy, efficiency or whatever will depend on each researcher's values. as has been argued, one of the most important units of analysis is the nation state within which is encompassed a national society**. within this framework the focus is on major structural components and their relationships as they interact to form the whole. many macro studies have used the nation state as a unit of comparative analysis but this is not the same as analysing a national society. stein rokkan has pointed to what he calls the "whole nation bias" in comparative studies and the weakness inherent in taking aggregates rather than components. he says, "most comparisons have been limited •following this, mills offers some advice to those concerned about substantive problems: "in actual practice, every working social scientist must be his own methodologist and his own theorist, which means only that he must be an intellectual craftsman. every craftsman can of course learn not much more than a general kind of awareness" (1959:121), going on to add that, "the classic focus, in short, is on substantive problems. the character of these problems limits and suggests the methods and the conceptions that are used and how they are used" (128). **a case for using the nation state as the key level of analysis is made by c.w. mills, "in our period, social structures are usuallv organized under a political state. in terms of power, and in many other interesting terms as well, the most inclusive unit of social structure is the nation-state. the nation-state is now the dominating form in world history and, as such, a major fact in the life of every man.... in choosing the national social structure as our generic working unit, we are adopting a suitable level of eenerality: one that enables us to avoid abandoning our problems and yet to include the structural forces obviously involved in many details and troubles of human conduct today. moreover, the choice of national social structures enables us most readily to take ud the 11 to institutional or aggregate statistical data for each nation as a unit and have tended to neglect highly significant variations in the rates of growth among competing economic, political or cultural centres and between such centres and the rural peripheries" (1970:49). in other words, to overcome the "whole nation bias" in comparative studies requires the apriori analysis of the national society which in turn may then be compared in terms of the types of relationships found within the national society and the processes* of developing to this stage. it may seem unusual that a paper on canadian society would have this concern about comparative studies but it is to be understood that each nation has its differences as well as similarities and much can be learned from these. indeed, c. wright mills has noted, "it is only by comparative studies that we can become aware of the absence of certain historical phases from a society, which is often quite essential to understanding its contemporary shape" (1959:157). moreover, it is not merely a theoretical or academic exercise but many canadians themselves engage in just such comparisons— principally with the united states, but with europe and other industrialized nations as well, although typically limiting these to other liberal democracies. aside from the outstanding work of john porter, there are only a handful oi sociologists in english-speaking canada who have taken a total or national society approach--such as, at times, s.d. clark, kasper naegele, a . k. davis and, to some extent, frank vallee and don whyte. but in quebec there are many more, such as hubert guindon, maurice pinard, guy rocher, marcel rioux, jean-charles falardeau, jacques dofny, gerald fortin, phillipe garigue, pioneer quebec sociologist leon geerin and fernand dumont,** to name but a few. as suggested earlier, major issues of public concern, for it is within and between the nation-states of the world that the effective means of power, and hence to a considerable extent of history-making, are now, for better or worse, tightly organized" (1959:135). •john porter has commented, "there is no comparative analysis, for example, when six scholars produce separate papers on the educational systems of six different countries. each study may as well have been published separately rather than bound together since they draw nothing from each other" (1970a: 144). the same, of course, may be said for readers which are called canadian society but lack any internal unity aside from the common subject matter of canada. they might more appropriately be called 'sociologies of canada'. **see especially dumont's, "the systematic study of french-canadian total society" (original, 1962) along with the 14 articles in the section on 'sociological interpretations on the social evolution of french canada', 'economic structure and social stratification 1 and 'social organization and culture' in marcel rioux and yves martin (cds.), french-canadian society (1964). see also nock (1974). 12 however, quebec sociologists have limited themselves to a 'total society' analysis of quebec and have not engaged in a 'national society' analysis of canada. these contributions cannot be minimized because they represent necessary starting points, but their lead must be expanded, elaborated and developed if a reasonable sociological understanding of canadian society is to be achieved. this emphasis, it needs to be stressed, is not parochial. it should be seen as a necessary requisite to national comparative analysis, as rokkan suggested above. ncr should it be abstracted from sociological theories and methodologies developed elsewhere; rather, these should be adapted to the canadian experience, if and when they fit. vallee and whyte, in their paper "canadian society: trends and perspectives", have argued that "sociologists are too busy making up for the backlog of sheer information about canadian society to worry about the enterprise as a whole and to engage in much soul-searching concerning the theoretical and methodological aspects of this enterprise" (1968:849). in terms of the distinction presented earlier, they are arguing that most of what has been occurring is a 'sociology of canada' rather than a 'canadian sociology'. in fact, they argue that, with a few notable exceptions, "canadian sociologists have rarely adopted a holistic perspective, one in which the system-as-a-whole is the universe of study" (849).* this does not mean that every piece of research must cover all aspects of canadian society and address every issue. it does mean that regardless of the particular focus of study--be it ethnicity, regionalism, immigration, class, or whatever--a central question is what this means for the national society, that is, how each part relates to the whole. similarly, it is important to stress again that the focus on a national society suggests that the differences with in society are important as differences between one society and* others. thus ethnic differences, regional splits and class relations within canada go a long way to understanding that society. at the same time aspects such as these cannot be abstracted from an analysis of canada's international context. this means more than simply a 'comparative perspective', which itself is interesting and informative, but an international framework of analysis placing canada's internal developments in the context of external ones. •similarly, a.k. davis argues, "by and large anglophone academic sociology in canada has failed to present a realistic and holis' tic picture of the evolution of canadian society" fl*>7f>:31). 13 some frameworks for the study of national societies* (i) regional power relationship frameworks recently there have emerged some frameworks, developed mainly for latin america's relationship with advanced capitalist nations, based on regional power relationships. these models integrate both national and international dimensions and are built on both a national society and total system perspective. that is, they analyse each nation state in terms of the indigenous regional and class power structures while simultaneously analysing the relationships between these structures and external centers of power. central to all of these models is an unequal relationship between interdependent units which form a set of asymmetrical associations either within national societies or between nation states.** according to andre gunder frank and his 'development of underdevelopment' model, "contemporary underdevelopment is in large part the historical product of past and continuing econ*in the canadian corporate elite (1975:345-353), i d i ?cussed a national society framework which will not be presenttd here, except to say ralph miliband's distinction between the state system and political system suggests a fruitful organizing framework. **barrington moore, jr., although applying an interesting analytical scheme to various societies, is a suoject to a 'large society bias'. he writes, "the fact that smaller countries depend economically and politically on big and powerful ones means that the decisive causes of their politics lie outside their own boundaries. it also means that their political problems are not really comparable to those of larger countries" (1966:xiii). is canada a 'small country' in moore's terms? in some respects, but not in all, nor is it an underdeveloped nation, nor totally politically or economically dependent. but it is also not a 'large country' in international terms. the 'decisive causes' are not totally outside canada and to the extent they are, it is in large part a result of internal policy or non-policy, as the case may be. theda skocpal has made a similar point in her critique of moore, emphasizing the relationship between "intersocietal" and "intrasocietal structures and processes", suggesting his focus is intrasocietal. she writes, "variations of ultimate political outcomes of the modernizing process (moore's dependent variable) are explained by a combination of the strength of the 'commercial impulse' and the type of class structure through which its effects are channeled ... .moore was anxious to establish his cases as societies free from 'foreign influences'. but, of course, no society is free from foreign influences, and, in his case accounts, moore is repeatedly forced to refer to 'external' conditions or events in order to explain 'internal' states or chanc es" ("a critical review of barrington moore's, social origins of dictatorship and democracy", politics and society, vol. 4, no. 1. 1973:28-29). l 14 omic and other relations between the satellite underdeveloped and now developed metropolitan countries" (1969:4). the model is not restricted to international relations; rather, it attempts to link internal developments to relationships within as well as outside of nations, or what he refers to as "a whole chain of constellations of metropoles and satellites" (6). his central hypothesis is that "within this world-embracine metropolis-satellite structure the metropoles tend to develod and the satellites to underdevelop" (9). in other words, there is a chain of exploitive relations between various levels from the local to' the regional to the national and international which serve to accumulate power and resources at the highest levels and drain them from the lowest. johan galtung presents a variation on the themes of prank. he begins, as did frank, by focusing on "inequality within and between nations" and specifically analyses the interactive relations contained therein. the key linking or mediating mechanism he defines as ".coupling" which means "some type of social causation in interaction relations and interaction structure" (1971:83). using the imagery of 'center' and 'periphery'*, galtung argues "there is a disharmony of interest between the center nation [metropolitan nationj as a whole and the periphery nation [satellite nationj as a whole" but maintains that this misses an important refinement "because it blurs the harmony of interest between the two centers, and leads to the belief that imperialism is merely an international relationship, not a combination of intraand inter-national relations" (84). the key mediating party in the galtung model is the "bridgehead" in the center of the periphery nation. inequality results from the way interaction takes place and can be identified in terms of sets of elites. in what he calls the "multinational, asymmetric stage", galtung argues, "elites have emerged in the periphery nations, strongly identified with and well harmonizing with the center elites" (96). one final refinement galtung introduces has particular relevance to canada and that is the 'go-between' status of some nations, mediating between center and periphery nations in much the same way the center in the periphery nation mediates in the general model (104) because of the type of imagery used, a problem with the regional power structure models is their emphasis on geographical distinctions rather than class distinctions; for example, the bourgeoisie may be located in metropolitan areas but so is much of the proletariat. while keeping the overall perspective •the terms 'periphery' and 'center' as images of international economic relations have been used since at least 1949 by raul prebish in his the economic development of latin america and its principal probl erns" ]j siew york , united nations department of social and economic affairs, 1950:1 (original published in spanish in 1949). 15 of international relationships and their intra-nat ional implications, recent analysts have paid much more attention to the class structures within these nations and have argued that some elements of these class structures have become ' internationalized' . these types of analyses norman girvan has classified as "historical/ institutional/structural" approaches.* the most impressive example of such an approach is the work of osvaldo sunkel in "transnational capitalism and national disintegration in latin america". using five inter-related concepts of "development, underdevelopment, dependence, marginality and spatial imbalances", sunkel argues: a realistic analysis of latin america development should therefore be based on a conception which assumes our socio-economic system to be formed by two groups of structural elements: internal and external. among the internal factors are: the pattern of natural resources and population; political institutions, especially the state; sociopolitical groups and classes; the ideologies and attitudes of different groups and classes; the specific policies followed by the government; etc. the complex of internal and external structural elements, and the interrelations among them, define the structure of the system, and constitute, therefore, the framework within which the functioning of the national system and its processes of structural transformations take place (1973:135). more specifically, there are three dimensions of the analysis-' process, structure and system--whereby "it is postulated that underdevelopment is part and parcel of the historical process of global development of the international svstem, and therefore, that underdevelopment and development are simply two faces of one single universal process" (135-136). the most recent phase in these relationships maintains the overall structural asymmetry between nations but now that they have become "ever more closely integrated— it is necessary to take into account that this new model of international economic relations is based operationally on the transnational conglomerate, a new kind of business organization that has experienced an enormous growth during the last decades" (139). there now appears an "internationalized" sector in both the center and periphery nations built on the institution of the multinational corporation. for the periphery nation this likely means that "international mobility will correspond to the internal •for an important overview of the types of analysis which have been performed in third world countries, see girvan's, "the development of dependency f.conomics in the caribbean and latin america: review and comparison", social and economic studies , vol. 22, no. 1 (1973: 1-33) . 16 nobility particularly between the internationalized sectors of developed and under-developed countries, which, as we have indicated before, constitute the nucleus of the international capitalist system, and, therefore, probably also constitutes an international market for skilled resources" (170). sunkel's model thus focuses on developments within center and periphery nations but, in addition, adds an international category because of his 'global perspective'. from this wider perspective, analogous with the continental system between canada and the united states, two basic components can be identified: a) a complex of activities, social groups and regions in different countries which conform to the develooed part of the global system and which are closely linked transnationally through many concrete interests as well as by similar styles, ways and levels of living and cultural affinities; b) a national complement of activities, social groups and regions partially or totally excluded from the national developed part of the global system and without any links with similar activities, groups and regions of other countries (146) . thus the imagery used by sunkel is of a "transnational kernel or nucleus" at the "heart" of the international system which tends to be integrated plus national segments which tend to be "segregated or marginal" to the core of the dominant national and international system. the importance of these segregated sectors in both the center and periphery is their relationship with the transnational integrated sectors in terms of the types of demands they may make and conflicts which may occur. it is important to recognize that in sunkel's model class relationships are of crucial importance but do not correspond to the ' integrated-marginalized ' dichotomy. rather, there is a 'core' of international capitalism into which some segments of the periphery bourgeoisie, middle class and a portion of the working class or even agricultural classes are incorporated while some parts of all classes are marginalized. there is still an overall international hierarchy between nations based on an asymmetrical relationship but above this is an integrated multinational segment 'transcending' this in an international capitalist system. the effect of integrating galtung's idea of 'go-between' nations with sunkel's 'integrated and marginalized' segments of the class structures of center and periphery nations means that a rather integrate model of international and internal economic relations could be developed. mediating between the various structural components of the model would be the institution of the multinational corporation and the elites who control them 17 and others who work for them. to turn this general model into a theory of international and regional capitalism would require a great deal of empirical work but as a guide to this system requires a model somewhat more developed than that for latin american nations because of canada's unique role of mediator for foreign controlled capital plus its own foreign investment and the extensive foreign investment within canada itself.* although there has been some discussion of various regional power structure frameworks within canada, very little empirical work has actually been done. what has been undertaken is at the level of the frank 'development of underdevelopment' thesis and not in terms of more recent models such as c-altune's or sunkel's. mel watkins, for instance, suggests using a "center-margin framework" similar to frank's model for examining the national bourgeoisie and "its relationship of dependency or independence with respect to the imperial business class or the imperial bourgeoisie" (1970:35). in so doing, he recognizes the importance of the "metropolis-satellite chian" used by frank (37-39), arguing that in the international framework, "canada would lie above the line as one of the exnloiting nations rather than an exploited nation" (40). but at the same time the internal relationships must also be taken into account and it is in this context that arthur k. davis' paper, "caradian society and history as hinterland versus metropolis" (1971), is important**. however, these humble beginnings have led to very little in the way of model building or theories, not to mention the absence of empirical research. while this is somewhat better in the case of regional analysis within canada, there is virtually nothing published about the continental context . *** •see wallace clement, "the canadian bourgeoise: merely comprador?", a paper presented at the marxist study institute, toronto, feb., 1975 and the section on "absentee ownership and 'linkages'" at the end of the next section. **the importance of the boundaries selected for study is also noted by keyfitz when he writes, "if we study any institution in canada, for example, trade unions or an automobile plant, our conclusions will come out one way if we treat it as autonomous, as though anv links with the united states can be disregarded, and another way if we treat it as part of a larger continental entity" (1974:34). ***to comprehend the nature of the relationship between canada and the united states at any given time, it is necessary to understand what is happening within each. milner and milner are amonc the few who have actually practiced this, writing, "the united states behaves toward other nations in ways which are to a great extent a reflection and outgrowth of the economic structures and social system inside its borders... in order to understand many of the most important aspects of everyday experience in quebec, we must understand 18 these frameworks have a particular promise for canadian social science as models because they reflect a centralist tradition important in canada's development, particularly in terms of its early colonial links and the early development of central canada as exemplified in innis's staple theory and the lower/creighton 'laurentian thesis'. each has been built on an analysis of structural power links binding them into a whole founded on geography, regionalism, and resource extraction. one of the differences between most elite models, such as that used by john porter in the vertical mosaic , and the regional power structure frameworks outlined here is the force of opposition built into the latter. they see the relationship as one of running conflict whereby canadians are placed in a 'doublebind' between the united states and canadian business interests, both of whom have turned toward the regional hinterlands for their surplus extraction. replicated in canada are the beginnings of a model of a national society in its international context.* although these have not as yet been developed sufficiently or applied adequately to canadian society, there are clearly beginnings in this direction. many more specifications are required in such a model, some of which are suggested in the international models, before it can address some particular characteristics of canadian society. it would seem important to specify more clearlv the dimensions such as regionalism, class or ethnicity being analysed and recognizing some of the differences and clusterings which may occur. for instance, there may be an important difference in french-english relations with respect to the economic domain as compared to the state. indeed, this has recently been shown to be the case (clement and olsen, 19741. also, the links between various levels must be more clearly specified and the mechanisms of mediation examined more carefully. furthermore, the relationships between the various 'parties' in both the 'center' and 'periphery' must be examined more thoroughly. this means, for instance, examining relations based on economic and state power in terms of the ethnicity of the power holders and their regional location. it may be that there is uniformity within the 'center' but diversity in the •periphery' which affects the types of resistences davis suggests should exist. finally, the international dimension must be explored more thoroughly for the internal implications of some of the crucial facts of life in the united states--beg inning with its internal class structure and the culture which sustains this structure" (1973:9). •while the international context has been stressed here, internal relations can also be examined within this model. for example, frank vallee notes, "one cannot understand situations and trends among the native people without taking into account the nonnative people who form part of the social environment" (1171:149) 19 these structures. these preliminary points arising from various regional power structure models may prove useful in the attempt to develop a 'canadian sociology' . they would clearly allay any criticism of such an undertaking as parochial. indeed, they would bring the analysis of canada into an international framework in a more meaningful fashion than could anv series of 'sociologies of canada'--or traditional comparative studies— because they demand that relations between various institutions in canada and other national societies be specified, not simply as they compare. for example, rather than comnaring political, judicia], economic, or educational institutions and policies in 'canada, the united states and the united kingdom, the researcher would ask what implications the institutions and policies of one nation have for others--both in terms of models that have been adapted after being established in one place as well as the impact of policies and institutions from other nations and their implications for the nation under study*. some of these questions will be returned to later but first the consociational democracy model will be examined. (ii) consociational democracy there has been an attempt to present a model of certain types of nationa*. societies characterized as 'segmented' in terms of ethnicity, religion, language, or political .tructure. this approach has been presented and applied specifically to canada and other nations in a collection of papers edited by kenneth mcrae, consociational democracy: political accomoda tion in segmented societies (1974). although variously called "segmented plural ism" , and "contradictarian democracy", mcrae suggests that the term "consociational democracy' is most convenient (3-4) . he distinguishes three perspectives in the general consociational literature: 1) as a pattern of social structure, emphasizing the degree of religious, ideological, cultural or linguistic segmentation in the society itself; 2) as a pattern of elite behavior and mass-elite relationships emphasizing the processes of decision-making and conflict regulation; 3) as an underlying characteristic of the political culture arising from historical circumstances that may antedate the period of mass politics (5) . mcrae* s summary of the literature suggests that one element stands out as most important and is a prerequisite for a society being 'on the relationship between 'endogenous' and 'outside* factors on development, see giddens (1973:265). 20 considered consociat ional ; he says, "the cleavage in question should be sufficiently intensive and durable to rive members of the respective groups a distinctive and persistent outlook or cultural orientation that is different from that of other sectors, a raison d'etre for maintaining organized segmentation" (6). underlying the entire model, but not made explicit, is the assumption that these cleavages will become organized and be manifest in the political system so as to stabilize the society as a whole. this is apparent, for example, in lijphart's definition: "consoc iat ional democracy means government by elite cartel designed to turn a democracy with a fragmented political culture into a stable democracy" (1974:79). while the model explicitly deals with cleavages based on regional, religious, linguistic and ideological splits, it does not attempt to incorporate social classes as possible subcultures. similarly, the consociat ional model stresses the role of the political system but does not take into account others such as the bureaucratic, economic, labour, or mass media in terms of representing population segments. mcrae has made a cautioned application of the consociat ional model to canada, albeit limited to the political system hecause of the bias contained within the general model. his main findings are that, "the primary lines of segmentation in canada are difficult to identify with precision on account of (.sicj the reinforcing but not completely overlapping effects of province, language and religion", especially because there is not one government in canada but eleven, including the provinces and federal government thus creating a "distorting forum" for the segments. using a comparative method to place canada's segmentation in a relative position to 'classic' segmented societies, the results are "inconclusive" since "by any of these criteria province, religion and language canada must he ranked significantly lower". probably most significant, given the political orientation of the model, is his finding that "because of the nature of the party system and the electoral system, modern political parties in canada have not divided alon^ any of the axes of subcultural cleavage—accommodations between subcultures must take place within the governing party" (260-261). while there may be some resemblance between canada and the consociational model, it does not adequately explain developments even within the political system. some of the preconditions for the development of a consociat ional political system mav in fact exist but they have not become organized and represented in the political system in the way the consociat ional model suggests. in his book, elite accommodation in canadian politics (1973), robert presthus has adopted a consoc iat ional approach , part icularly as developed by lijphart. his use of the model, however, is more metaphoric than real because he adapts it to the study of interest groups rather than the study of cleavages based on so21 cial segments. in fact, what he does abstract from the general model are those elements related to "elite accommodation" as "an integral part of the larger process of national integration" (4). this is simply another way of saying "elite pluralism" (see bachrach, 1967). but what is made quite explicit in presthus' analysis is that he regards this not only as a desirable way to organize a 'democratic' society but as the only way. he says, "elite accommodation may be regarded as a structural requisite of any democratic society in which political decisions are the result of negotiation and consultation among the elites concerned ... -.el ite accommodation is inherent in the process of democratic government" (4). while presthus' account of "elite accommodation" may be an interesting ideology* as a "way to overcome pervasive modern schisms between labour and capital, social classes, and indeed, between government and the governed" (25), it is not an adequate base upon which to build a theory or model of the way canadian society operates. it is subject to the same limitations mcrae pointed out for the consociational model and confines the analysis to the role of the state system, virtually ignoring the operation of other power domains in the society and not providing any insight into such issues as regionalism or class structures.** while the consociational model does not address sufficient issues necessary to develop a 'canadian sociology' it does provide at least some potential in terms of the two major segments of canadian society. these are the 'two nations' of french and english canada. language, religion, political units and regional centralization are all elements serving to reinforce this major cleavage, as is economic position and, at least to some extent, political parties with the liberals dominant in quebec and the conservatives and ndp almost totally absent. however, the issue of social class is not integrated in the model and for this it is necessary to turn to a long standing debate over the place of the concepts 'class 1 , 'nation' and 'ethnicity' in canadian society. (iii) the problems of class, nation and ethnicity*** although the theoretical debate has been centered mainly in quebec, the issue has relevance for all of canadian society, *see, for example, w.l. mackenzie king's, industry and humanity . macmillan: toronto, 1913. **in a highly critical reveiw of the book, john meisel has noted that presthus introduces the idea of elite accommodation but fails to integrate it, saying, "the book makes only a marginal contribution to this still open issue", canadian forum , may-june, 1974:44-46. ***this question will be discussed again shortly in terms of dominant issues in canadian society. hubert guindon's work, especially "two cultures: an essay on nationalism, class, and ethnic tension" (1968), as john porter's extensive analysis has demonstrated. bourque and laurin-frer.ette h3ve analysed the relation between the concents 'class' and 'nation' within quebec, raintaining that "a diversified class structure has existed within the two nations present in quebec's social format ion ... the stri-.ctuve <'.oes not prevent, on the one hand, the collaboration between the elates whose members are in the main from different nations, and on the other hand, the class struggle, within e^ch nation". while they see the two concepts as related they are by no means identical, nor should they be merged into such hvbrids as 'ethnicclass'. they define and analyse the concepts as fellows: an ethnic group forming a single dominated social class cannot therefore constitute a nation. we can only analyse it as a social class within the social formation and, in the case of the capitalist mode of production, the nation to which it belongs. in the case of an ethnically differentiated class, the ethnic character may be the vestigial result of another social formation; an earlier social formation in the case oi conquest; another nation, where large-scale emigration is involved (1972: 192) . the distinction _s put more simply by stanlev p.yerson when he says, "the concepts of class anil nation are not equatable. classes enbody relationships of property and work, in the context of a mode of product ion .. .nat ion-communi ty embodies an identity linguistic and cultural, that is not simply an 'effect' of class, however closely its evolution may he interwoven with the shifting patterns of class relations" (1972 : 224 ) . for some time now, quebec sociologists have been relating the issues of class and nation to a total society analysis. more than other sociologists in canada, they have ilso given a 'richer' meaning to the concept of class.* this can be seen, for exairple, in the use given the term by dofny and xioux: on the role of the middle class in french canada is a total society analysis which takes into account its larger context and the interplay between 'class' and 'nation'. tie clearly relates class developments and political movements within the context of ethnic differentiation. see also maurice pinard's paper on this topic, "working class politics: an interpretation of the quebec case", canadian review of sociology and anthropology , vol. 7, no. 2 (may 1970) . •contrast dofnv and rioux with porter's use of class (1965:9:s). 23 the concept of social class is intrinsically related to the concept of 'total society'; unless social and cultural phenomena are placed in the context of the total society, there is the risk of confusing social classes with groups based on occupation or socio-economic interests ... .social classes are very large groups, real rather than nominal, that appear in those societies where the economic structure predominates and determines the congruence between the other sub-systems of the society. these groups we call -social classes are mainly differentiated according to economic inequalities. social classes appear in heterogeneous societies and tend to form subcultures, in other words, cultural systems which are relatively coherent (1964:307-308). later dofny and rioux raise the problem of the "truncated" nature of the class system in quebec, a problem also raised by rocher when he speaks of "a double system of classes, permeating each other at certain leve'ls, but relatively autonomous in relation to each other" (1964:336). while porter is generally noted for his 'nominal' use of the term class, it is apparent in the following comment on quebec that he iz using the term as more than statistical categories. he says, "because british and french live as largely separate groups there are two class systems, each bearing the stamp of its own culture. both french and british have their old aristocratic families as well as their lower classes. however, these two class systems while operating side by side are also firmly interlocked in the economic system" (1165:91). unfortunately, there has not been a major attempt to provide a class analysis for the national society in the way this has been done for quebec. leo johnson's article (1972) is the closest there is to analysing classes as large, active groups on a national scale. this may be because they are not real or associational groups on this level but research has not been done to either confirm or deny this. aside from their importance in terms of 'class' and 'nation' , what is important in the way these concepts have been related analytically is the use of a historical perspective. this is particularly true for bourque and laurin-frenette, ryerson and guindon, but is also evident in porter, who says, "to understand the interplay between ethnic inequalities and class inequalities it is important to look at how ethnic differentiation within a society develops. in most historical instances it has been through conquest or migration" (1974:5). porter differs from others mentioned in one other important respect; he analyses the relationship between 'ethnicity' and 'class' 2k rather than 'nation' and 'class'.* this allows him to deal more broadly with canadian society as a whole because it extends the analysis to cover 'third' ethnic groups, representing about one quarter of the canadian population. a recent book by david hughes and evelyn kallen, the ana tomy of racism: canadian dimensions (1974), has expanded^ trie study of ethnicity well beyond earlier attempts. although they begin with one central problem, that of racism in canada, they expand their analysis to include a wide range of inter-related phenomenon, such as conquest, immigration, individual, institutional and structural racism, ethnic group boundaries, the role of education, religion and language, and the effect of state policies, as they affect and are affected by their central problem. of particular note is the way they are able to relate ethnicity and power, privilege and prestige in canada in a wav not evident since the vertical mosaic . hughes and kallen systematically deal with many problems at the core of a 'canadian sociology' by searching out the linkage between inequalities in each of these phenomenon. thus there are two fairly distinct issues; one concerning the place of quebec in confederation and another the relationship between class and other relatively fragmented eihnic eroups the first may be analysed in terms of conquest; the second is better understood in terms of selective migration and other factors . to summarize this discussion before examining some dominant issues in canadian society, it may be said that there is much that is suggestive in regional power struggle models, the consoc iat ional democracy model and the "class ''nation' distinction but they have not been developed into what could be called a model of canadian society. a number of sub-theories or models are available in the literature but they have not been brought together into a coherent and comprehensive 'canadian sociology ' . some issues in canadian society the preceding sections have discussed the idea of a 'canadian sociology' and some approaches which may prove useful in the attempt to develop this perspective. this final section will provide a few dominant issues (for illustrative purposes) which could be addressed in such an undertaking. the conclusion will provide some suggestions about how these issues could be related and expanded. •on the relationship between ethnicity, cultural groups and territory, see hughes and kallen (1974:88). (i) national identity and the social psychology of canadians the literature in canadian sociology on 'national identity 1 is probably more extensive than on any other single tonic*, particularly one at the national level, yet little consensus has emerged in terms of what this means in canada or -hat it? implications are for a 'canadian sociology'. some have argued canada is conservative because of its 'tory' origins and reiection of the american revolution, others that it is liberal because of its american orientation, still others that canadians are engaged in a love-hate relation with themselves and the united states. whatever the case may be, the 'national character 1 route to understanding canadian society seems a 'dead end' not a place to begin but a place to arrive. the onlv conclusion seems to be that there are a number of social forces affecting the way canadians act and believe. it seer.s -nore reasonable to first identify these social forces and the", address the consequences for the canadian consciousness. one of these social forces is ethnic diversity, the struggle between the french and english plus the ethnic pluralism of the other one quarter of the population. in the absence of alternative identities, the canadian state has pursued policies of ' biculturalism ' , and more recently, 'mult icul tural i? v , which serve to reinforce these atomized 'organized' mir orities . ' it is difficult to tell if these are identities arisinc from the canadian 'mosaic' or ideologies projected by the canadian state elite (see clement and olsen, 1974). sociologists themselves are not free from responsibility on this matter, as vallee and whyte have said: sociologists who have written on national character and values in canada have based their conclusions on impressions, introspection, and on inferences from such disparate sources as literature, historical developments, and statistics on a variety of subjects. the framework within which these studies are carried out and presented is almost always a comparative one in which canadians are •see, for example, kasper naegele (1968); s.d. clark (1974); george grant (1965); mildred schwartz (1967); j. m.s. careless (1969); john porter (1967, 1971, 1974); g. horowitz (1971); s. m. lipset (1964, 1971); don whyte (1973). ••examining the consequences of these policies porter says, "it really seems questionable that we seek our psychic shelters through ethnic identification. there is no doubt that ethnic groupings can play this role, but at the cost of perpetuating ethnic stratification" (1974:10). 26 viewed as not quite as american as the americans, not quite as british as the british, not quite as australian as the australians, not quite as french as the french. in this way, sociologists reinforce a folk impression of long standing that canada is a hyhrid product arid an intermediary between the united states and europe (1968:836). religion, ethnicity, linguistic groups, class, sex and region all compete with a sense of national identity but it seems an understanding of how and why these operate can best follow from the studv of the structure of canadian society. a study of regionalism using the framework outlined earlier would suggest some of the reasons why there are several identity references operating simultaneously. in the west, for example, there is one pull to central canada and another north-south pull to the united states. nations need not be monolithic or highly integrated; indeed, precisely the way the parts (be they ethnic, regional, class, etc.) relate to the whole is one of the most important and interesting variables. only very recently with the appearance of patricia marchak ' s ideological persp e ctive on canada has the weakness of the 'canadian character literature begun to be overcome an j this has been done by using a methodology different from the earlier studies. she has chosen to do her macrosocioloi;v of canada by counterposi ng "two versions of the canadian reality" --dominant and counter ideologies (1975:viff). the method is to contrast ideology and reality and see why some classes adopt one or another, and evaluate which 'fits' an understanding of canadian society. marchak is able to weave an analysis of history, class, nation, foreign ownership, sovereignty, regionalism, french canada, ethnicity, native peoples, sexual inequality, professions, unions, political parties, institutional arrangements--publ ic and private, education, wealth and income distribution into her theme of dominant and counter ideologies, and this is all done at the national society level. although they are not as yet related in such a way that it could be said that they constitute a model or theory of canadian society, the beginnings of such an attempt are apparent. an analysis using the regional power structure discussed earlier which attempted to integrate the findings of rex lucas' study, minetown, milltown, kail town , john porter's study of the national power structure anh other work on the international level* is another approach worth exploring. the number of such 'in a paper, "econfomic elites in ontario: a broader perspective on regionalism" (presented to the canadian studies institute, university of waterloo, november, l (->74), i attempted to show the linkages between the local, regional, national and international levels. this approach is particularly useful for illustrating the implications of broader powei structures on the day to day activitites of canal ians. 27 links as education, corporate control, regionalism, urban-rural migration, social mobility, unions anil others, are innumerable.* a study which tried to examine national identities based on these types of linkages would probably have more to say about how people develop 'identities' than those undertaken within the 'national identity' approach thus far. indeed, studies such as the impressive work of lucas have done a great deal to link the social psychological level of analysis into broader social forces and structures. it is likely that studies such as his or marchak's would be the primary way that a 'canadian sociology' approach could tap this level of analysis yet still retain its broad national focus. (ii) french canada as a hinterland model it was mentioned earlier that hubert guindon's analysis of french canada provides an analysis of a total society which could be expanded to the whole of canada. guindon links the "increase in the political and economic relevance of the provincial governments at the expense of the federal government" to changes which have occurred in the class structure of quebec (1968:33ff). this could also be related to postwar transformations in the prairies, particularly oil in alber*a, which have catalysed ;.imilar developments there.** althougi all of the parallels and points of analysis cannot be developed here, it is worthwhile to suggest some of the more obvious. guindon says, the vulnerability of the traditional elite set the stage for an easy introduction of industrialization even if it meant dependence on foreign capitalists. the capitalists transformed the french canadians into urban dwellers. to service the needs of the recently urbanized masses, the traditional power elite had to transform its institutions into large scale bureaucracies, giving birth in the process to the new middle class of french-canadian society (44). in these few sentences guindon has introduced and integrated a historical framework for the study of industrialization, bureaucratization, foreign investment, class transformations and the study of elites. later he discusses social mobility, saying, "french-canadian bureaucratic pyramids have a narrow base --geographically, socially, and organizat ionally--because of their small scale. this means that upward mobility is more re•these linkages will be returned to in the final section. *see john barr and owen anderson (editors), the unfinished revolt , mcclelland and stewart: toronto, 1971. stricted, less diversified, and less extended" (51). all of this resembles closely the experience of other regional hinterlands in canada.* it places the analysis within its canadian and international context, shows the limitations of attempting to create parallel mobility structures alongside dominant ones (and the need to do this because of exclusion from dominant ones) it explains the role local elites have in mediating with outside rower centers and where their interests are located. vallee and whyte have commented: compared to the total canadian nation-state, the distinctive entity called french-canadian societv is easy to grasp in its totality. the inter-dependence of the parts that make up the socio-political entity called quebec can be traced historically and synchronical ly in a way which it would be extremelv difficult to do for canada as a whole, except at the most abstract level (1968:850). perhaps it is not so much the size or complexity of canadian societv as the lack of attempting to develop such an approach anong english-speaking sociologists that explains this failure. surely the same ;ind of analysis can be done for the rest of canada; it even has the model of such analyses as guindon's to start with. . absentee ownership and 'linkages' since i have discussed the international setting of canada's economy elsewhere in "the changing structure of the canadian economy" (1974), only a few aspects of national level absentee ownership will be provided for illustrative purposes of some of the 'linkages' necessary to develop a 'canadian sociology'. canada's economy has two types of elites, comprador and indigenous, which are centered in relatively distinct economic sectors. the '.dor elites are the canadian counterpart of foreign controlled multinationals. in terms of the galtung model, they are the 'go-between' elites in the periphery nation. some modifications to this model are necessary because, in addition to the comprador or 'go-between' economic elites, there exist independent indigenous elites. aside from this amendment, the fragmented economic system in canada can be related to the fragmented political system, particularly in the context of the above re*the case studies of philip mathias', forced growth , james lewis and samuel: toronto, 1971 are interesting illustrations. all five cases are located within the weakest provinces. see also garth stevenson, "continental integration and canadian unity" in andrew airline, et al, editors, continental community ?, mcclelland and stewart: toronto, 1974. 29 marks on the relationship between foreign investment and regional hinterlands. that is, the fragmented political system has encouraged the development of foreign direct investment within various provinces which compete with each other thus encouraging differential patterns of growth between provinces and higher rates of foreign investment. this, in turn, has resulted in an increase in provincial power in the postwar period, particularly in the oil rich prairies, which has also weakened the federal system. these brief remarks suggest that it is important to establish relationships between various developments a*nd places them within their international context. absentee ownership on the national level has had important economic, political and regional implications but these represent only one side of the relationship. if the full implications for a 'canadian sociology' are to be explored, then other aspects must also be taken into account. absentee ownership may be defined in terms of the distance from a particular center, similar to the metropolis-hinterland chain discussed earlier. the boundaries under consideration must be specified; for example, at the national level foreign ownership is absentee and the economic boundaries do not coincide with the nation state. on the community or regional level, absentee ownership refers to the branches of firms which are not locally owned but are part of larger corporations, themselves either canadian or foreign owned. the consequences of foreign ownership at the national level and local level exhibit similar characteristics, including lack of autonomy from outside control and decision-making, withdrawal of capital and resources, as well as a higher degree of uncertainty about the continuation of the branch plant at both levels since by definition they are peripheral to the overall operation. another consequence of importance is the effect on the class structure and mobility of the indigenous population, either local or national. with a branch plant system, management is typically recruited outside the community and frequently transferred thus creating a system of 'transient managers'. this means local people have a lower probability of upward mobility and participation within this type of structure. on the national level the matter is more complex. if management is brought in from outside, as has often been the case in the past, the opportunity structure for indigneous canadians is blocked. however, if foreign firms recruit within canada to fill these positions, this opens the possibility for middle class canadians who are university educated. given the high degree of blockage which occurs within canadian controlled firms, this may be desirable from the perspective of individual mobility, but must be weighted against other consequences of absentee ownership suggested above plus the fact that this may be a way that indigenous entrepreneurial talent is drained off within canada, thus inhibiting the creation of indigneously controlled activity. 30 in some respects it does make a difference whether the absentee owners are canadian or foreign. these would be with respect to the retention of profits within canada which could be used to expand industrial activity thus creating greater surplus and more jobs. it would also mean that many of the secondary and tertiary spin-offs such as technological development could be supported and encouraged within canada. being based within canada may also mean the firms would be subject to greater regulation by the canadian state. in other respects it makes little difference whether the branch plant is canadian or foreign controlled, particularly for the regional or local level. in either case the major access points to occupational mobility, the major accumulation of surplus, and the sources of decision-making, occur outside the area. the community or region within which the branch plant is located is equally vulnerable to decisions taken at head office, be it in toronto or new york. this discussion is the result of taking several levels of analysis such as the local or regional level represented by rex lucas' minetown, mill town , rail town , john porter's analysis of national economic elites and tying them all together in a variation of regional power structure model. while tnis discussion is very brief and only illustrative, as well as being confined mainly to economic dimensions, it does provide some indication of the type of analysis that could be developed into a national society framework. the key analytical points are in the linking mechanisms between each level and a concern with the entire scope of the society, including the frequently missing local level. several other types of analyses could be provided which link external and internal developments; for example, the relationship between immigration and retaining a french-speaking population base for the purposes of political power as evident in the recent bill 22 controversy in quebec or the relationship between foreign control of industry, the occupational structure of the labour force and the implications this has for postindust rial ism. while these cannot be developed here, they give some indication of other types of studies which could be related to a national society analysis. conclusion the future of canadian sociology will depend upon its keepin? up with current trends and being able to place them within the context of the national society. in canada there is a double dilemma of trying to catch up empirically and theoretically by developing the basis for a 'canadian sociology' while at the sane time staying abreast of current developments and remaining relevant. moreover, there are many areas that have been almost totally neglected, not only in a substantive sense hut in the sense of the types of perspectives used in the analysis. for 31 example, there has never been in canada a macrosoc iological approach by a marxist on the scale of, say, charles ii. anderson (1974) for the united states, although elements of such an analysis exist such as leo .johnson (1972) on the decline of the petite bourgeoisie or in some respects davis' metropolishinterland analysis (1971) following the town-country dichotonv in marx. more work needs to be done even with existing studies. for instance, an important undertaking would be tying the analysis of class, power and elites together empirically; put crudely, this means tying part i of the vertical mosaic , 'the structure of class", into part ii, 'the structure of power', by maintaining the national perspective and adding an historical analvsis. there do exist a number of theories, models or at least themes about the nature of canadian society, some of which have already been mentioned. porter, for instance, has identified the relationship between class, power and ethnicity, and this has now been expanded by hughes and kallen; a.k. davis' hinterland-metropolis relationship based on regional inequalities; a. richmond's relationship between immigration and ethnic inequalities, following, in part, from porter's 'two stream model' of migration; leo johnson's changing occupational structure and the decline of the petite bourgeoisie; pat marchak's two competing versions of social reality; and i have suggested the relationship between foreign and indigneous economic development . together, and with others, it may be possible to form these into a 'canadian sociology 1 . social life is highly complex and experiments in types of societies have been varied. the task of social studies is to 'make sense 1 out of the variety of experiences and experimentations by identifying major processes, structures and relationships. therefore, the study of canadian society can and should be approached from a number of perspectives, using a variety of methodologies and data sources. but ultimately, to have relevance for the study of the national society, they have to be tied into an overriding framework and presumably be aimed at a common concern--such as improving the lot of canadians, which could mean being concerned about the decline of inequalities of all sorts and the increase and redistribution of the society's resources. it has been argued that the focus of a 'canadian sociology' should be on an array of substantive problems in canadian society but these in turn must also be worked out in terms of the priorities of each researcher. this means an evaluation of what are considered important or significant social issues and concerns, an analysis of them and reporting these results. the process of reporting to other scholars and the public is intended to have others re-examine what they consider to be social issues and to re-order their priorities accordingly. this goal would be one of the major tasks of such an undertaking, and one of its most important rewards. 32 one important question remains: is there a uniqueness to canadian society that makes it a valuable topic beyond its intrinsic interest to its residents? the answer offered in this paper has been in the affirmative. canada lends itself for comparison to probably a wider range of nations than does any other single country. it encompasses a number of problems such as its industrial development, ethnic diversity and regionalism, comparable with, yet distinct from, other countries. its rolr as a 'mediator' or 'go-between' generates a number of unique internal developments different from most other nations. for these reason's and more, it seems a worthwhile undertaking to continue to develop a 'canadian sociology'. postscript 1977 in the two years since this paper was written there has been a maturing of my thinking about models and theories of canadian societyt although i continue to accept the paper's central direction. i would now adopt the political economy tradition as the most fruitful approach; in my view, it has the strongest historical roots and the greatest insights int:> canada's social structure. it is a tradition represented in different ways in the works of such diverse people as donald creighton, harold innis, tom naylor and stanley ryerson. it encompasses scholars from c.e.macpherson to h. claire pentland to john porter. broadly contained within this tradition is the tasis for a distinctive canadian social science which would make sense of and give meaning to the development and current structure of canadian society. the following are what i regard as the most central components of a model of canada as develops 1 within the political economy tradition. these features of canadian society give direction to the most appropriate questions to be asked and relationships to be explained: 1. the implications of external relations for internal development, especially early colonial ties with france and the united kingdom and current dependence on the united states in many economic, political and military activities. 2. the. persistently active role of the canadian state in the economy and its fragmented federal-provincial structure . 3the continued survival of two nations within a single state--the conquered french and the conquering ;lish--and the demise of the native population. '* . the role of immigration in filling the west during t-arly stages ol pment (1879 to 191^) and the urban centres of too; alternate routes, volume12, 1995 gender parody reveals only that there is no original gender identity on which gender "fashions" itself. what we think is an original is really a copy, a failed "ideal that no one can embody" (butler, 1 990: 139). she concludes from this that gender is merely "a stylized repetition of acts," a performance, neither real nor true, played out by cultural and political discursive regimes. 2 since she has already collapsed sex and gender into a single performance, we can only presume then that the body is also neither real nor true. hence butler has succeeded in removing our flesh from any considerations of identity, subjectivity, and voice. sex and gender are merely effects of discourse, despite butler's lip-service to reconceiving the body "no longer as a passive medium or instrument awaiting the enlivening capacity of a distinctly immaterial will" (1990:8). from these brief examples, and many others, 3 it is clear that feminist discussions ofembodiment reveal a relentless rejection ofthe "literal," "real," "biological," "p re-discursive," or "referent." indeed, the search for a way to separate the flesh from speech, consciousness, and subjectivity, can be thought of as seeking to position women's bodies somewhere else. as vicki kirby argues: ffo although rethinking essentialism marks an avowed return to the body, the reunion is always be-ing deferred. it is certainly not an easy homecoming. perhaps commerce with the body is considered risky business because the border between the mind/body split... just cannot be secured. (1992:6) the problem facing feminist attempts to envision a re-embodied subject arises out of the assumption of the very terms they are struggling to destabilize: the notion of a fixed universal body that must be rejected as an inaccessible pre-discursive reality. in effect, as kirby claims, it is assumed that "ifthe ground isn't solid then it isn't a ground—if it moves and changes, then it must bejust the representation ofa ground" ( 1 992: 1 4). in other words, the feminist anti-essentialist stance is ironically founded on an essentialist notion of the body, nature, or biology, that is absolute and immutable (kirby, 1992:14) we cannot continue to talk about a female embodied subject that is rooted in the traditional notion of the body alienated from consciousness and the world while there are several feminist intellectuals currently engaged in such a critical project, most notably grosz and kirby, ' what i think is missing in even the most eloquent and persuasive invitations to rethink the body, is a sustained conceptualization of the body as flesh, as inseparable from consciousness and actively interacting with the surrounding world. 5 once we accomplish this, it will no longer be necessary to speak of the body as though it were some entity isolated from minds, others, and the world we share. the urgency of such a project is evident in grosz's assumption of the "bedrock" that is the body; that while viewed as interacting with social inscription and thereby accounting for all the contingencies and particularities of life, it is nevertheless conceived of as a "whiteness." sidonie smith is right to remark that the discourse of embodied woman is comprised of the subjectivities of those "angels in houses": the bourgeois women. as the universal, male subject is formed through the discourses of identities such as race, class and sexuality, "so those angels take shape through the discourses of various kinds of contaminated women, those even more 'colorful' others who are denied the possibility of escaping the drag of the body" (smith, 1993:17). notes 1. see teresa de lauretis, sexual difference: a theory of socio-symbolw practice, (1990) for a description of her differentiation between "woman" as cultural imago, and women, /ft) as real agents of change. 2. for example, the practice of drag, butler suggests, "plays upon the distinction between the anatomy of the performer and the gender that is being performed," thereby exposing the imitative and contingent structure of gender itself (1990:137). 3. elsewhere i have included the work of elspeth probyn who makes distinctions between a "natural" body and a "discursive" body (see "this body which is not one: speaking an embodied self," hyparia 6:, no. 3, 1991). see also feminist responses to irigaray, whose discussions of female embodiment provoke enormous ambivalence and anxiety in anglo-american feminist writing: maggie berg (1988), diana fuss (1989), toril moi (1985), margaret whitford (1989). 4. tania modleski and moira gatens should also be noted here. modleski convincingly argues against an "as if' position in her first chapter of feminism without women (1991), appropriately entitled "post-mortem on post-feminism," where she asks "could we... say of anti-essentialist feminists that only those possessing vastly wider options than the majority of women living in the world today can play at 'being if while theorizing themselves into the belief that they are not it?" (1991:22). gatens points to the split between representation and reality, and the "impotence of our political vocabulary" for articulating bodily difference ("corporeal representation in/and alternate routes, volume 12, 1995 the body politic,'' cartographies: poststructuralism and the mapping of bodies and spaces, north sydney: allen & unwin, 1991: 85). 5. i am thinking here of the work of maurice merleau-ponty as well as the novels of toni morrison: two examples of writers who ignore the dualities of flesh and consciousness, flesh and object, and flesh and word, and move on to an understanding of what it means to be sentient beings references braidotti, rosi 1989 'the politics of ontological difference." pp. 89-105 in teresa brennan (ed), between feminism and psychoanalysis. new york: routledge 1993 "embodiment, sexual difference, and the nomadic subject." hypatia 8 (1):1-13. butler, judith 1 990 gender trouble: feminism and the subversion ofidentity. new york: routledge 1992 "contingentfoundations:feminismandthequestionof"postmodernism." pp. 3-2 1 in judith butler and joan w. scott (eds.), feminists theorize the political. new york: routledge 1993 bodies that matter: on the discursive limits of "sex". new york: routledge eagleton, terry 1993 "it is not quite true that i have a body, and not quite true that i am one either," london review ofbooks 15 (10):7-8. grosz, elizabeth 1990 "inscriptions and body-maps: representations and the corporeal." pp. 6274 in terry threadgold and anne cranny-francis (eds), feminine, masculine and representation. sydney: allen & unwin 1991 "introduction." hypatia 6 (3): 1-3. hooks, bell 1 990 yearning: race, gender and cultural politics. toronto: between the lines kirby, vicki 1992 "addressing essentialism differently... some thoughts on the corporeal." i niversityof'waikato women \s studies occasional paper series. new zealand: university of waikato, 4: 1-23. smith, sidonie 1 993 subjectivity, identityand the body: women 'sa utobiographical practices in the twentieth century. bloomington: indiana university press alternate routes a critical review editorial board: jim conley, joan st. laurent alternate routes is an annual publication of graduate students in sociology and anthropology. manuscripts, subscriptions and communications should be addressed to: alternate routes department of sociology and anthropology carleton university ottawa, ontario, canada k1s 6b6 the editorial board wishes to establish a genuine forum for the exchange of ideas. we welcome critical responses, commentaries or rejoinders, which we will endeavour to publish in subsequent the editors gratefully acknowledge the financial assistance of the department of sociology and anthropology, carleton university, and its chairperson, gordon irving. we also wish to thank bev cruikshank for her administrative assistance and karen bouris for for speedy and expert typing. subscriptions : individuals and institutions: $3.50. make cheques payable to alternate routes. copyright 1980, alternate routes, unless otherwise noted. editorial statement alternate routes is a critical review of sociology and related disciplines. we strive to publish the critical work of graduate students which will inform, and be of interest to students and teachers of social science. in our view, sociologists must be critical, both of their own society and of the work of other social analysts. we seek, therefore, to publish work which challenges existing sociological and societal orthodoxies. to achieve this goal we require manuscripts. we encourage graduate students among our readers to submit essays, reviews, commentaries and rejoinders on a wide variety of subjects. we particularly welcome work which treats some aspect of canadian society within the wider concerns of critical social science. isbn 0-7709-0108-5 a critical review vol. 4 1980 contents robert alford (u. of california, santa cruz) elections, state policy and the marxian tradition in political sociology: an interview 1 stella lord (carleton university) the struggle for equal pay for work of equal value: a case study 21 robert white (australian national university) knowledge and power: determinations of educational curriculum 53 john malcolmson (simon fraser university) the limits of keynesianism: some theoretical observations 87 debra clarke (carleton university) the state of cultural theory: a review of past and present fashions 105 digitized by the internet archive in 2011 with funding from carleton university, department of sociology & anthropology http://www.archive.org/details/alternateroutesc04alte elections, state policy and the marxian tradition in political sociology: an interview robert alford introduction like the discipline in general, political sociology in north america has undergone considerable change since the early 1960s. in his career and publications, robert alford reflects many of those changes, which are of more than merely historical interest for scholars working in political sociology. alford is probably best known in canada for the published version of his doctoral thesis, party and society: the anglo-american democracies , in this comparative study of "class voting" in great britain, australia, the united states and canada, he found that canada scored lowest on the index of class voting. although not always welcomed or accepted by them, this seminal work has provided subsequent canadian scholars with an agenda for debates on the methods, conceptions, indicators and explanations concerning the presence of class in canadian elections. from these early pluralist beginnings, alford went on to study the development of health policy in new york, from what might be called an elite perspective, and liter to studies of political participation and urban politics from a broadly marxian perspective, critical of both elite and pluralist approaches. along the way, an article on paradigms in political sociology summarized some of the differences among these approaches. the transformations represented by robert alford' s career, which reflect and are part of broader changes in political sociology, are of more than historical interest because he has attempted to combine the insights, levels of analysis and concepts of pluralist, elite and marxist approaches into a perspective able to deal with the complexities of politics in liberal democracies. the interview is presented in the hope that it will stimulate thought and discussion on the relationships among voting, the operations of state agencies, capital accumulation, and social class. directions for further work are indicated tentatively in the interview, but they need to be developed in theoretical reflection and empirical research on politics in canada and elsewhere. that the interview ends abruptly, with loose ends left dangling, is thus appropriate. robert alford was interviewed at carleton university on march 20, 1980, by jim conley. 1. e.g. r. ogmundson, "party class images and the class vote in canada," american sociological review 40 (1975): 506-512. 2. see the interview for references. j.c. to start from the beginning, you are probably best known in canada for party and society , where you compare class voting in canada, the united states, great britain, and australia. as you no doubt know, it continues to inspire work by canadians such as john myles and others. your recent work seems to take a starting point that's a long way from the pluralist assumptions that were behind party and society . that change seems to reflect wider trends in political sociology in north america. how do you explain this change in north american sociology, and perhaps in robert alford? second, do you consider the kind of voting study you did in party and society to be worthwhile still? if it is and you were to do it today, would you do it differently? in what ways? how would you analyse the electoral system and elections in liberal democracies? r.a. those are large questions and it is a little hard to formulate a coherent and well-developed answer on the spur of the moment. i suppose the quick and easy, but basically accurate answer to the first one is that the change in my own perspective does reflect certain trends in north american political sociology. old problems have persisted and new crises have emerged which cannot be theoretically understood or politically dealt with in the framework of existing political theories or mechanisms for liberal reform. that's the quick answer. i think the change in sociology is more marked than in other social sciences partly because of the more diverse intellectual traditions within sociology. historically, sociology always has been more 1 (chicago: rand mcnally, 1963) influenced by marxist or neo-marxist ideas. even people who have been pluralists have always included some aspects of analysis of the class structure. lipset is the best example. i think his agrarian socialism is a very important work. whatever criticisms you can make of sociology, many in the field recognize the importance of class interests and the class structure for state policy. the critical tradition is not alien to sociology; it remains dormant under some historical conditions and re-etierges under others. with respect to the second part of your question, elections and voting are not merely devices to control or co-opt popular struggles. they are important democratic institutions, however much they are biased and distorted through the ways in which participation is rendered fictitious and despite the pact thct voting and party competition have relatively little effect on major developments. my answer is that voting studies are important, and i don't think they have to be done within a pluralist perspective. i haven't really thought about the issue of how i would do party and society differently. that book differed from the classic pluralist analyses of voting in the sense that i was analyzing class voting as an attribute of the system, rather than examining the factors predisposing individuals to vote in a certain way. the "columbia" and "michigan" traditions were primarily interested in the determinants of the voting decision. you have on the one hand the concern of the michigan school with issues, candidates and party identification as the triple determinants of individual behavior. the classic studies respectively are: bernard berelsen, et al.. voting (chicago: univ. of chicago press, 1954) and angus campbell, et al . , elections and the political order (ny: wiley, 1966). on the other hand, you have the more institutional concern of the columbia school with cross-pressures and the impact of religion versus class in the earliest studies. because i was a student of lipset's i drew more upon the columbia tradition in my dissertation, but i transformed it into a structural analysis of an attribute of the system and not of a set of individual variables predicting individual voting. i still think that was the right way to do it. with different measures, in the light of john myles' critique of the index of class voting and with more theoretically self-conscious and empirically adequate indices of the social base of parties in different regions and nations, such studies can still be useful. now given the line of development of my more recent work, i would look for the links of voting much more with state policy, the political strategies of elites and the changing class situation in particular political units. i now would use a much broader theoretical framework for the analysis of elections and voting. j.c. i found what you said earlier about elections being important a bit surprising. although it may simply be my reading of it, the paper on 4 political participation and public policy you did with roger friedland gives me the impression of a concentration on the symbolic effects of voting and similar forms of political participation, and an emphasis on the social control aspects rather than the policy effects of political participation. r.a. i absolutely agree; i think you stated the point of that article correctly. but elections have both aspects: they are genuine democratic john myles, "differences in the canadian and american class vote: fact or pseudo-fact," american journal of sociology 84, no. 5, march 1979, pp. 1232-1237. "political participation and public policy," annual review of sociology , vol. i, 1975, pp. 429-479. institutions because they provide equal rights to participate to all citizens and because their outcome installs a regime with great potential power over important decisions. the fact that they are genuine gives them great symbolic power as an instrument of social control. that's the paradox. elections have an impact: proposition 13 in california is a good recent example. it was an overwhelming demonstration of the electoral power oi the people. this particular decision had reactionary consequences, but the referendum shows people that their vote has an impact. elections and the machinery of voting, and the biennial and quadrennial spectacles of party competition around congressional and national elections in the united states do absorb the political attention of the population. in that sense they are like sports events: the symbolic function of elections that murray edelman and ike balbus, among others, have emphasized. but they wouldn't have that effect if they did not have genuine and real political import as well. if elections were purely spectacle and thus only symbolic, they would not have that impact. j.c. in a recent paper on the urban fiscal crises, or better, on urban fiscal strains and the way crises are created out of them, you and your co-authors try to analyse the forces making for a rise in public expenditures. in the context of neo-conservative or reactionary attacks on public expenditures (particularly social services) exemplified by proposition 13, which seem to be able to mobilize many people against the visible sources of their personal fiscal strains of taxes, etc., that sort of analysis seems 'roger friedland, frances fox piven, and robert r. alford, "political conflict, urban structure and the fiscal crisis," intl. journal of urban and regional research , vol. 1 #3, oct. 1977, pp. 447-471. an important topic for left sociologists. they are politically important, but as you and your co-authors note at the end of that article, in the absence of any mass movements of political change, they seem also to be politically impotent. do you see that sort of analysis connecting up in any way to political movements, and in more general terms, what role does sociological analysis have in this kind of situation? r.a. well, you're asking three or four related but somewhat different questions. i do think that our point was an important one, namely that there is a potential political basis for challenges to the cuts in public and social services. but i don't see that our analysis or others like it have had much direct impact in mobilizing a reaction to them. the connection between research and intellectual analyses and political movements has always been a highly indirect and mediated one, so that the role of critical analyses of particular policies and their impact in enlivening a movement or providing ammunition for it is quite unclear. j.c. it is also a question that seems to have plagued sociologists. they usually seem to have been particularly concerned about the social and political effects of their work and often try to give what they do some political relevance. it is very obvious in the case of piven and cloward's poor people's movements , where the analysis is intended to inform the strategy of that sort of movement. it is less clear in the case of most other work, but there still seems very often to be some political impetus. r.a. of course piven and cloward are among the few left social scientists who have been actively involved in the movements that they write (new york: vintage books, 1979) about. as you know they were instrumental in helping to shape the welfare rights movement and earlier cloward helped form mobilization for youth in new york city. but it is unclear what their analyses contributed as opposed to their own presence as organizers. it may be that sociologists have to participate directly in order to have an impact, like anybody else. j.c. we've already spoken indirectly about a flowering of marxist sociology in north america. as a paradigm in sociology, is marxism a fragile flower always in danger of fading, or is it a fairly hardy young weed that will strongly resist any attempts to get rid of it? what are the strengths and weaknesses of marxist theory and research in sociology? r.a. that question presupposes an answer to a question that you didn't ask. i think it's a mistake to talk about marxist sociology, because i think that implies that "arxism is a sufficiently comprehensive and adequate theory by itself on which to base an analysis of sorietv. marxist concepts are intrinsically interdisciplinary, and for marx they belong to a "critique of political economy." even that currently popular phrase— "political economy"—seems to me in some ways to be untrue to the spirit of marxism as a critique of the partial theories that derive from the arbitrary disciplinary boundaries of the social sciences and history. there is also another reason why speaking of "marxist sociology" is not a good idea. i think such a usage reinforces and maintains lines of antagonism within political and theoretical debates that are not healthy. that is, it tends to set up a polarization between people who are willing to include themselves as marxists and those who are then willy-nilly in a non-marxist camp, i think that is politically and theoretically dangerous. to answer your question rephrased, i would regard marxism as an intellectual tradition that should be available and dealt with seriously by all sociologists as a very important component both of the education of students and available for people to deal with regardless of the problem they are working on. given that, i would say that the marxist theoretical tradition is developing and likely to have more and more influence, if it avoids the double tendencies towards self-ghettoization and repression: the exclusion of people who use the marxist tradition from jobs, or the intimidation of those who have jobs. while political repression is certainly not created by sectarianism, it is at least made possible to some extent by the tendency of the left to fragment and become hostile sects. you asked about the strengths and weaknesses of marxism as a paradigm in political sociology. let me speak to the strengths first. first, in a marxist analysis crises of the state are not simply exogenous phenomena that burst upon the scene like a storm but are explainable within the structure of the theory and of the society. second, class relations and class conflict are recognized directly and centrally as having an independent causal impact on state policies and state structures. organizations of both capital and of the working class are regarded as among the fundamental forces at work in society, both to shape its structure and to bring about change. to start from those premises as starting points of analysis i think is a contribution of fundamental importance. the main deficiencies of marxism in political sociology are that marxism has no satisfactory theory of the state or of democracy. the recent attempts to develop a concept of the relative autonomy of the state do not go far enough in recognizing the internal dynamics of the state. once institutionally established, separated by the very requirements of capitalist rule, the state 9 cannot be understood in any direct way as representing the interests of the capitalist class. that is recognized in general by the formula "relative autonomy of the state" but not in practical analysis. in concrete analyses these tend to fall back on either an "instrumentalist" or a "structuralist" perspective, either to discover to what extent agents of the capitalist class are directly present in the making of state decisions or to assume that the structure of the state in the "last instance" serves or represents the interests of capital as a whole. neither of these assumptions is a good starting point for analysis. j.c. if i'm not mistaking your position, your solution to that problem is basically to look at the consequences of state policy, at who benefits from state policy. that leaves the question of who is served by state policy open, but it doesn't avoid the functionalist trap of going from who benefits to an implied causal mechanism. the only way to avoid that is to go back and look at the causes of state policies, and it seems to me that the so-called structuralist theory of the state is at least starting to do that. you're correct that there is still this assumption that in the last analysis (a nice loophole) the state will serve the capitalist class or a fraction of the capitalist class. but there is starting to be a recognition, e.g., in poulantzas' state, power, socialism , ' that you have to look at the mechanism by which that happens and an implicit question of whether that is always going to happen. r.a. well, it is certainly inadequate to say "to look at the mechanism" because that formulation still accepts the assumption that "that happens" (i.e. the function for capital) in the normal political process. that assumption is precisely what has to be questioned. that is thr theoretical inadequacy of the marxist tradition at 7 lxmdon: nlb, 1978. 10 this time. i'm obviously gliding over the significant differences among marxists with respect to this question, e.g., among miliband, poulantzas, and o'connor .that leo panitch and others have been trying to specify and which are very important. in talking about the consequences of state policy i wasn't saying that approach will solve all the problems because that is not really a theoretical position but rather an "entry point," the point where you analytically enter this complex system and develop a research question which will enable you to ask something quite concrete. the opposite approach is somewhat easier—to postulate, and be right, incidentally—that the causes of state policies and state structures are constrained in some broad way by the fact that the state exists within the capitalist context. but if one examines the consequences of state policies then i think it's harder tc accept that theoretical postulate. both for causes and consequences, the form and level of class conflict—among other factors—have an impact. i think that in the famous poulantzas-miliband debate they're both right. what i mean by that is that poulantzas is right in arguing that the direct participation of members or agents of the capitalist class is indeed as he puts it "chance and contingent," that it's not necessary for the capitalist class always to be present in order for their interests to be served. but i think miliband was right in sayina that we have to specify the concrete conditions under which specific political elites function and in whose interests they function. you can't postulate that the structure of the state is organized in such a way as to serve capitalist interests either in the short run or in the long run. j.c. there's a difference of levels then. 11 r.a. that's right. the issue must be defined as one about the historical conditions under which different class agents must be mobilized to serve their interests. it has to become a historically concrete problem. i would even argue that if you find members of the capitalist class directly present, it is a sign that they are either losing or in danger of losing. that is, only in political and economic crisis must they become active in order to influence policy. if the state is running smoothly, then in effect they don't have to be active (it is even better that they are not active) to have their interests served. i'm not arguing this empirically; this is a theoretical speculation. now look at what this theoretical position leads to. certain kinds of issues are likely to become public, visible, and then politically open to the participation of more groups. in such instances of crisis the situation has the appearance of pluralism, that is, the outcome is genuinely uncertain. therefore ruling elites and dominant class interests are vulnerable in those moments and must mobilize if the outcome is indeed vital to their interests. yet the outcome is problematic, because the issues have become public and visible and therefore politicized. that's why "mapping" the whole range of state decisions and state policies is important. otherwise you. tend to have a biased sample of either those issues and decisions which are insulated from popular and democratic influence or those which are highly politicized and in which the outcome is genuinely doubtful. j.c. in the article about the urban crisis that we've already referred to, the argument is made that there is a seqreqation between public and o politicized issues dealing with what o'connor calls legitimation and you call political integration, and the insulated ones, out of public view and a the fiscal crisis of the state . new york: st. martin's, 1973. 12 concerned with accumulation. are you saying then that in cases of crisis the ones that are ordinarily insulated become public issues? r.a. no, not necessarily, but if they do then the balance of political and class forces has shifted and the outcome becomes problematic. we are assuming that we are dealing with capitalist societies that are democratic in the sense that mechanisms of participation do make a difference, if popular interests get mobilized. i'm not at all assuming that the balance of power always shifts in moments of crisis, quite the contrary. 9 j.c. both in health care politics and in this urban crisis article, and in contrast to much marxist writing that tends to see crises as more or less automatic results of tendencies of the system, you appear to be arguing that crises are created by elites as a way of resolving strains that exist within the state. r.a. i guess this might be looked at as the transposition into the state of what marxists used to call in the economy a "shakeout," i.e., the destruction or elimination of the less efficient firms in the economic crisis. maybe political crises have that same character, as a way of getting rid of the less efficient state agencies. j.c. it sounds awfully conspiratorial. r.a. no, not necessarily. i don't think we intended to imply (although we may have come close to it) that crises were that free floating and could be created by political elites almost at their will. certainly not. different interests are strategically located at different places to take advantage of crises and to exacerbate them, to define them ideologically in certain ways 9 (chicago: university of chicago press, 1975) 13 or to use them to get leverage in different ways. once a situation like that is in existence, the outcome is to some extent open. they may not be able to control the outcome. popular interests may mobilize and have an impact that could not be foreseen or controlled. and not all crises are created by elites in any direct sense, for example the sort of thing discussed by piven and cloward in poor people's movements . j.c. in party and society you did a comparative study, and in the urban crisis article called for more comparative studies of such phenomena. it seems very often that marxists and left sociologists haven't done that, often i suppose because they find that a lot of very basic work has to be done in their own society before any attempt is made to be comparative (such is the case in canada, i'd say). do you see much prospect for real comparative work that takes account of the different levels of analysis in political sociology? r.a. i think this is a general problem for people working in the marxist tradition and for others. perhaps it is more difficult for people working in the marxist tradition because of their refusal to see different levels or different units of analysis as autonomous. the best marxist analyses are both multi-level and historical, so the problems of comparative analysis are compounded. i'm not sure that it's a good starting point to say that much of the fundamental work has to be done in one society, because you don't know what the criteria for relevance are until you have some sense of comparison. if you're doing a case study of one country, you can quickly get enmeshed in the details which may be unique so that they are not general izable. if the specific family alliances among elites, say, in canadian society are completely idiosyncratic and yet have decisively influenced some rather : i critical investment decisions, you may not know that unless you've started out with a comparative framework using the economic consequences of ruling class family networks as your problem. it's a chicken and egg problem to some extent. you don't know what the relevant factors are until you've done the comparative study, but you don't know how to do the comparative study unless you know enough about each case to make the comparison. it depends on the state of knowledge in a particular area as to whether it's better to get the facts straight history of a particular institution or state policy. a lot of groundwork like that certainly has to be done in many areas. on the other hand, it may be better to start out comparatively, if you are able to develop a comparative framework using theoretical guidelines as to what is relevant. this rather important issue of research design underlines the importance of creating a research group where it's possible to have a genuine division of labour, not necessarily collective work but at least a genuine intellectual division of labour on some of these problems. j.c. in the sense of people working on different problems or people working in different areas? r.a. both. i recommend this approach highly. people in france, britain, the united states and canada may be working on pension policy, for example. they get together for an initial conference where they compare notes in a kind of gestalt about the general pattern of the policy making and history of pensions. the process will sensitize them to the dimensions of variability as well as about factors each person is not aware of because some process is absent in their own country. if the research process becomes a quasi-collective division of labour both detailed case studies and systematic comparisons can be done at once in some sense. is i advance that vision of the ideal research process as theoretically desirable but in practice i haven't done any mors comparative work than most other people. but i have been involved in an international group trying to work on urban crises. we want to analyze the differences in the specific structures of the state which deal with these problems. in canada, for example, you could look at the centralization and de-centralization of the state as a rolitical strategy, not as the iron boundaries within which political struggle occurs. the very structure of the state is an object of political and class conflict. j.c. one question that lies behind some of the questions i've already asked concerns r. paper you did on paradigms in political sociology several years ago. in that paper, you appear to simply set out the alternative paradigms without really taking a stand on any of them. in the work you've done since then you do seem to take some position. what i would like you to do is not so much to say that one is better than another (although i want you to do that too) , but rather to state the grounds on the basis of which you would say that you should use one paradigm in preference to another. perhaps you'd have to take all three in any concrete problem. r.a. the essay you refer to was written in 1973 and it certainly did not take a stand on any of them. it attempted to state the assumptions of the class, elite and pluralist paradigms and contrast their distinctive assumptions and power to explain different aspects of social reality. to some extent i would still take that position, i.e. , that there is no adequate general theory. as "paradigms of relations between state and society," in leon lindberg, et al., editors. stress and contradiction in modern capitalism (lexington: lexington books, 1975), pp. 145-160. 16 i said earlier in the interview, marxism has no satisfactory theory of either the state or of democracy and can only with great effort be extended to cover some phenomena. they tend to be regarded as residual or unique features of the "social formation" or of the "conjuncture." i don't object to that mode of theorizing as long as it's clear what limited realms of experience and historical evidence the person who is making that statement realizes they are explaining, that other historical processes and factors remain open for investigation and interpretation. but you're also certainly right that in later writings i come closer to containing what i would now describe as the insights of pluralism within a combination of elite and class perspectives. if i had to describe the nature of a position or a synthesis i would put it that way. the autonomy of groups and the free formation of preferences as in the classic pluralist approach to politics i regard as a useful mode of explanation only within a very narrow range of real political issues. i think there are certain parameters or conditions under which you can describe the outcomes of political conflict using a pluralist model, but those conditions then have to be specified using concepts drawn from essentially a theory which specifies the autonomy of the state structure and the autonomy of the class structure. i realize that's a cryptic statement. you're raising one of the most fundamenta epistemological issues, that is, how (if it is possible) to integrate alternativi paradigms or perspectives. in effect you're asking me to give you a brief and almost glib synthesis, which is a very difficult thing to do, but i will try. first, the requirements of legitimation and accumulation in the capitalist state requires that the state be institutionally separated from the economy, that is the state cannot be under the direct and visible control of the capitalist class for various reasons that the neo-marxists have specified. 17 second, once the state is institutionally separated, it becomes internally differentiated into a politicized and de-politicized sector. this differentiation does not happen in ways which necessarily serve the interests of capital. this is the elite component and it is not the same as either an instrumentalist or a structuralist marxist prediction of the structure. now the pluralist element is that the politicized sectois genuinely open to change brought by the demands of diverse social groups. the political energies of the mobilized groups and parties are absorbed in attempts to influence state decisions largely in the politicized sector of the state. you could call it the sector of pluralist politics, which consumes the political energies of the population in certain kinds of reforms. the issues arour.d which it is possible to mobilize, or to have an impact are quite limited. this interpretation is quite consistent with the whole pluralist position. for example, the whole argument of dahl in who governs? (in different language) is that the impact of political action is limited to the political consensus at any given time, to a quite limited set of issues. now the plural ists do not theorize political consensus: that's their residual category. what accounts for those constraints on the effective range of issues? very briefly, i think both the internal differentiation of the state structure at any given time and the way in which the state is organized in a larger sense to meet certain kinds of requirement for a capitalist economy limit the impact of political mobilization. what i have just given is a structural description , not a prediction of any particular outcomes. i've attempted to state the ways in which each theory (hew haven: yale university press, 1961) 18 locates a particular aspect of reality and explains it with distinctive factors. again, that's only an approach, only a starting point, bat i think it enables one to take into account the incredibly complex and diverse panoply of political actors that get involved in a particular situation, without saying that all the sound and fury of pluralist politics is all of reality, or even the most important part. the other levels still exist at which issues are being decided and benefits allocated. (incidentally, 1 an currently struggling with a book which will expand this argument, with many illustrations from the empirical literature.) j.c. the way you've done it is to go from structures to be analysed in class terms, to the more specific structures of states, such as the segregation of agencies, and finally to the sound and fury of pluralist politics. presumably you car. trace it back then to the effects of pluralist politics on transforming the other levels. r.a. that's precisely right. if you take seriously the idea that the outcomes of the actual issues that emerge into political conflict are not completely determined by the structure of the system, then one can develop a more adequate explanation for the incredibly internally contradictory and fragmented structure of the state and the diverse public policies it produces. j.c. and it would account then for circumstances where it seems that the state is not serving the needs of the capitalist class. r.a. that's correct. this approach argues that if you look at a "cross-section" of the state at any given point in time it will be a reflection simultaneously of the impact of popular mobilization, of working class and other group interests as reflected in various organizations, of the outcomes of the internal strategies of state elites struggling to build bureaucratic empires 19 and of the direct impact of capitalist class interests either mobilized or not mobilized depending on the existing policy of the relevant state agency. because the state depends upon economic growth and tax revenue, it's internal processes are biased (in ways the structuralists have stated) toward the interests of capital. the sum total is a highly internally contradictory apparatus. the implication of this approach is that one cannot and should not leap to quick and easy judgments about the overall function of the state. nationalism and ideology stephen blight the purpose of this paper is two fold. it seeks firstly to place the concepts of "nation" and nationalism firmly within a materialist framework and, secondly, to analyze the relationship between nationalism and class. various forms of nationalism are discussed and the implications of nationalism for socialist strategy are considered. cet article a deux buts. premierement , il tente a placer les conceptes de "la nation" et la nationalisme firmement dans un contexte materialiste et, deuxiemement, il tient a analyser la relation entre la nationalisme et la classe. des formes variees de la nationalisme sont discutees, et les implications de la nationalisme pour la strategie socialiste sont considerees. historical materialism posits the primacy of the relations of production in society, with class struggle constituting history's motive force. accordingly, marxists tend to become bellicose when confronted with assertions (such as tudjman's (1981:233)) that "nationalism [rather than class) is the most important determinant in the course of history." modern nationalism is surely a momentous political fact, and there is good reason for approaching it with caution. socialist revolutions have met with success only in conjunction with nationalist movements and, in every capitalist crisis, the working class has displayed a stronger national than class identity. while some marxists have tried to accommodate these realities by reducing nationalism to class interests, others have conceded that nationalism is a mysterious independent force. in this paper, i shall situate the concepts of "nation" and "nationalism" within a materialist framework and, secondly, attempt to analyze the relationship between class and nation. it is my belief that recent theories of ideology will throw light on these two key problems and provide us with an understanding of nationalism which is both innovative and comprehensive. illustration will be provided through a discussion of nationalism in its various forms: state, sub-state, anti-imperialist and socialist. the nation: real or ideal? in order to have a clear understanding of the ideology of nationalism, we must first apprehend its relationship with, and the meaning of, the concept of "nation" itself. are the terms "nation" and "nationalism," as rosa luxembourg asserts, no more than empty husks into which each historical epoch and system of class relations deposit their particular material content? or 36 does the nation have some constitutive essence? does it refer to any discernible material factors? the philosophy of idealism locates the nation in the consciousness, with external symbols and practices being merely the outcome, the realization of the inner effect. according to ernest renan (1954:659): nation is the embodiment of a spiritual principle... land provides the substratum, the field of battle and work; man provides the soul; man is everything in the formation of that sacred thing that is called a people. nothing of material nature suffices for it. for renan, the nation is based on "collective consciousness" and "active will." symbols and practices associated with nationality become completely subjective products of the human mind. marxist theory emphasizes that consciousness itself is a social product, rooted in the material conditions of life. yet, an examination of marxist thought on this matter will reveal a strong tension between material factors and subjective consciousness in defining the nation. more often than not, however, an understanding of nations as "ideas" seems to take priority over objective factors. this reliance on subjective factors was implicit in some of the texts of austro-marxism. otto bauer (1907:107), for instance, maintained that the nation was essentially an idea, a "community of character awakening from a community of destiny" while renner (1917:123) advanced the startling concept of a "national spirit." lenin identified these abstract notions as an "idealist theory," and stalin polemicized against the austro-marxists in his 1913 essay, "marxism and the national question." in this essay, stalin summed up bauer's concept of nation as nothing but the "mystical national spirit of the spiritualists" (1953:310). he put forth his own definition 37 of the nation as "an historically constituted, stable community of people formed on the basis of a common language, territory, economic life and psychological make-up manifested in a common culture" (301). in order for a community to qualify as a nation, it must possess that "specific spiritual complexion of the people," otherwise known as the "national character," which distinguished one nation from another but was intangible to the observer (306). stalin has of course, resorted to the same type of language for which he will, a few pages later, chastise bauer. his definition seems to concede the priority of subjective consciousness over the mere operation of material factors in the make-up of the nation. tom nairn likewise stresses subjectivity in his analysis of nationalism in the break-up of britain (1977). for nairn, nationalism is an idea originating in the european "enlightenment" and spread to the rest of the world along with capitalist development. the uneven development of capitalism stimulates envy and frustration among peripheral elites who seize upon the idea of nationalism in order to mobilize the masses to right the balance. it is thus seen as a purely psychological construct; its materiality is denied: to say the assorted phenomenon and bric-a-brac of nationalism have a "material' basis is akin to saying that individual neurosis has a sexual explanation. .. "nationalism' is the pathology of modern developmental history, as inescapable as a "neurosis' in the individual, with a similar built-in capacity for descent into dementia, rooted in the dilemmas of helplessness thrust upon most of the world (the equivalent of infantilism for societies), and largely incurable. (1977:359) here, nairn localizes nationalism in the consciousness, a conglomeration of psychological reactions resulting somehow in a unified functional ideology. it is severed from it»s^foundation in reality. (8 psychological reactions resulting somehow in a unified functional ideology. it is severed from its foundation in reality. the work of regis debray (1977) and nicos poulantzas (1978) may prove to be helpful in dealing with the nation from a materialist standpoint. the striking similarities which characterise the theoretical perspectives of both authors on this particular issue allows us to lump them together here. both view the nation as substantial, transhistorical, and inscribed in the conceptual matrices of space and time. while the form of the modern nation is seen as historically transient, an invariable "something else" has cut across pre-existing modes of production. (for the sake of simplicity, i shall refer to all such spatially and temporally defined formations as "nations" ) . temporally, the nation's materiality is manifest in "ritual repetition, ritualisation of memory, celebration and commemoration" (debray, 1977:27) or what is generally designated by the term "common historical tradition" (poulantzas, 1978:107). spatially, we are dealing with territory, "from the growth of towns through communications, transport and military apparatus, to the emergence of borders" (poulantzas, 1978:99) or what debray calls "enclosed space" (1977:27). what these authors seem to be getting at is that what is conventially seen as indicative of the nation — economic unity, territory, tradition and the like — now must be viewed as the very constitutive essences of nationhood. the nation emerges out of the concrete practices of each social formation as it works to transform nature. at this level, it is no superstructure. along with the productive forces and social relations, the practices which constitute the nation hinge upon the determinant ecological and geographical conditions which make up the infrastructure. 39 the organization of people into politico-territorial structures is the result of many factors. the early superstructural forms of kinship or religion provided groups with identical objects of worship or common practices such as totem or taboo. the modern nation is, however, the creation of capitalism. most significantly, capitalism entails the separation of direct producers from their means of production and the creation of a mass of people free to sell their labour power, providing the material basis of modern "citizenship" (navari, 1981:13). capitalism created new classes tied together by an intricate division of labour, cast over vast territories and bringing together distant regions into immediate and functional relationships. it created the need to preserve and expand a system of domination and exploitation of complex interdependencies . the state is not a product of the nation; rather, the nodern nation is constructed by the state through a process of unification and homogenization. to return to poulantzas (1978:105): the state marks out the frontiers of this serial space in the very process of unifying and homogenizing what these frontiers enclose... the exact configuration and topography followed by this territory will, of course, depend on a whole series of historical factors (economic, political, linguistic, and so on). but what matters here is the appearance of territory and frontiers in the modern sense of the terms. the territory becomes national, and, by means of the state, constitutes an element of the modern nation. the tendency to substantialize and reify the nation on the part of poulantzas and debray is not without its dangers. for instance, according to debray (1977:27): "we must locate the nation phenomenon within the general laws regulating the survival of the human species... against death. against entropy." similarly, the poulantzean nation is an "object both theoretical and real," possessing "transhistorical irreducibil i ty" (1978:94). as james 31aut (1982) has pointed out, these kinds of arguments are derived from 40 german idealist theories of the state, especially the theses of herder and fichte. here, the view is that all people and the land upon which they reside form a metaphysical whole, a superorganic nation destined to become a unified state. as such, these recent contributions are seen by blaut as essentially a throwback to conservative thought. more serious, however, is the conceptualization of the nation itself as an active force in history. there is a danger of viewing it as prior to, more basic than, and autononouus from the class struggle: "the state is rooted not in class but in a deeper and more abiding substance, the nation" (blaut, 1982:12). while stressing the material basis of nationhood, it is not my purpose to substantialize and reify the nation on its own terms. further, it is necessary to avoid that idealism by which national phenomena are reduced to consciousness. how, then, are we to understand the ideology of nationalism? here, the work of althusser on ideology is instructive. for althusser, ideology has a material existence and is not ideal because it is always inscribed in social practices and expressed in objective social forms, such as languages, rituals. for the single subject, the existence of the ideas of his belief is material in that his ideas are his material actions inserted into material practices governed by material rituals which are themselves defined by the material ideological apparatus from which derive the ideas of that subject (1971:169). althusser is arguing against those who would overemphasize the role of men and women as creative agents, whose ideas determine the actions that he or she performs. instead, he inserts actions into practices, which are in turn governed by the rituals in which these practices are inscribed. in graphic form: ideal ist schema althusser •ideas ijsubjcct, consciousness, belief, actions -•practices, rituals, ideological apparatus thus, consciousness itself can arise only as a reflection of material practices. this supports my earlier contention that those items that are conventionally viewed as symptomatic elements of the nation (territory, tradition, and so on) may be seen precisely as the very constitutive essences of nationhood. these common objective factors lie outside of national consciousness; meaning is applied to them externally. but without these elements, there can be no ideology of nationalism. in other words, at the infrastructural level the materiality of the nation is the effect of concrete practice on its own terms. it is only through this understanding that we may comprehend the ideology of nationalism, which lies in the realm of superstructures. nationalism and class what is the relationship between nationalism and class? we can identify several tendencies within the marxist tradition concerning this question. the first tendency is most closely associated with lenin. here, the ideology of nationalism is reduced to the class interests of the bourgeoisie. for lenin, the historico-economic basis of national movements was that in order to achieve complete victory for commodity production, "the bourgeoisie must capture the home market, and there must be politically united territories whose population speak a single language, with all obstacles to the 42 development of that language and to its consolidation in literature removed" (1970:46). bourgeois-democratic national movements were confined to the "period of the collapse of feudalism and absolutism) (1970:46) and as such, should be given only conditional support by the proletariat. this view is entirely consistent with lenin's emphasis upon the existence of "paradigmatic" class ideologies. in his world of highly polarized political struggles, "the only choice is — either bourgeois or socialist ideology. there is no middle course (for mankind has not created a ~third' ideology and, moreover, in a society torn by class antagonisms, there can never be a non-class or an above-class ideology)" (1975:48). each concrete ideology has a necessary class belonging, and nationalism was the ideology of the bourgeoisie during a particular historical epoch. the second tendency is to view nationalism as prior to and autonomous from the class struggle. 1 this is, of course, the view which predominates in mainstream social science. the appearance of ethnic conflict is enough for such authors to dispense with class analysis. but what is disturbing is the trend in this direction among numerous marxists. for example, it is affirmed that the class struggle has been "eclipsed" by nationalism in nairn's subjectivist formulations (1977:351). furthermore, as we have seen, the inclination on the part of debray and poulantzas to invest the nation with an actual existence indicates a view of nationalism as being independent of the class struggle (as shall be clear later, however, poulantzas is somewhat ambiguous). this trend is entirely consistent with the current overemphasis on the "relative autonomy of superstructures" characteristic of much of neo-marxist theory. a third tendency is that of viewing nationalism as an empty concept. according to hobsbawm (1977:3), for instance, nationalism is a fuzzy 43 ideological construct "devoid of any rational theory." the decline of the economic role of the nation-state due to the internationalization of capital has resulted, he says, in the proliferation of "neo-nationalisms . " these nonsensical "neo-nationalisms" do not in themselves require any special theoretical effort by marxists. in taking this approach, hobsbawm is practically conceding the irrelevance of class analysis in dealing with this concrete form of political movement. although it may be no more than an illusion, we would still, however, have to explain the illusion. finally, i shall return to poulantzas, whose position, as i have indicated earlier, is ambiguous. in state, power, socialism , the book that is of most interest to us here, the nation appears as substantial, transhistorically irreducible, and likely to persist long after the end of class society (1978:94). nationalism can have a progressive character; it encompasses both the struggle of the bourgeoisie against the working class and the struggle of the working class against the bourgeoisie (119). nationalism, it would seem, has no history and is not tied to the interests of any one class. elsewhere, however, poulantzas (1974) breaks down ideology into constitutive elements which necessarily have a class belonging. deriving from lenin's conception, social classes are seen as possessing paradigmatic ideologies. concrete historical ideologies are an amalgam of heterogeneous elements, each with a necessary class belonging. thus, the dominant bourgeois ideology has both petty bourgeois and working class elements contained within it. poulantzas considers nationalism an ideological element of the bourgeoisie; as such, it is not subject to transformation in a socialist direction. how can we reconcile these two views? has nationalism remained the ideological element of the bourgeoisie, perhaps now belonging to relatively 44 more progressive sectors of this class? or, is nationalism free of any necessary class belonging and, by implication, not fundamentally a product of the class struggle? this is the kind of ambiguity which has plagued marxist discourse on nationalism for too long. we are faced with two momentous realities: class struggle and national struggle. how may we reaffirm the primacy of the former without falling into reductionism? fortunately, recent analyses of ernesto laclau (1977) will help to extricate us from this dilemma. although laclau focuses upon different phenomena (he is concerned with populism and fascism), we may, with caution, apply the thrust of his analysis to our problem. laclau begins by rejecting the notion of paradigmatic class ideologies, specifically the poulantzean version which stresses that ideological elements have a necessary class belonging. conversely, he argues that "ideological elements taken in isolation have no necessary class connotation, and that this connotation is only the result of the articulation of those elements in a concrete ideological discourse" (99). how are these neutral ideological elements incorporated into class discourse? here, he cites althusser: ideology "acts' or "functions' in such a way that it recruits subjects among individuals (it recruits them all), or "transforms' the individuals < it transforms them all) by the very precise operation that i have called interpellation or hailing, and which can be imagined along the lines of the most common police (or other) hailing: "hey, you there!' ... (100-101). interpellation is the mechanism by which individuals, who are simply bearers of structures, are transformed by ideology into subjects. the ideological level of society is made up of different types of interpellations. for laclau, then, the unifying principle of an ideological discourse is the "subject" interpellated and thus constituted through this discourse. this approach constitutes a real step forward over traditional marxist theories of ideology. laclau transcends the problem of paradigmatic class ideologies, which often tend to fall into abstract reductionlsm (i.e. "marxism-leninism is the ideology of the working class"). the idea that neutral ideological elements are articulated into class discourse through interpellation, which cuts across class boundaries, is a far more satisfactory way of accounting for spontaneous popular traditions and empirical forms of consciousness. next, laclau makes a distinction between class struggle and "classes-in-struggle. " class struggle is intelligible at the abstract level of the mode of production: the production relation that constitutes its two poles as classes in an antagonistic relation. "classes-in-struggle," however, is an antagonism distinct from the former in that it is only intelligible at the level of a concrete social formation, and only apparent in the ideological and political sphere. thus, in addition to the overdetermining class struggle, in any class society, there is a second contradiction, that between the "power bloc" and the "people." this kind of contradiction characteristically takes the form of dominated classes or class fractions struggling for hegemony against the dominant class or class fraction. "if the first contradiction. .. is expressed on the ideological level in the interpellation of agents as a class, this second contradiction is expressed through the interpellation of the agents as the people. the first contradiction is the sphere of class struggle; the second, that of popular-democratic struggle" (1977:107). how can laclau's formulation shed light on the kind of struggles we are concerned with here; namely, national struggles? in addition to the interpellation of agents as a class, attendant upon the contradictions at the level of the mode of production, we may also imagine the interpellation of agents as "the nation". in this kind of struggle, the dominated sectors would not identify themselves as a class but as "the nation," counterposed to the dominant power bloc which exists external to this nation. the people/power bloc struggle may thus be transformed into a national struggle, specifically where there exists (a) a territorial separation between the "people" and the power bloc and (b) a cultural, linguistic, and/or ethnic distinction between the "people" and the power bloc. it becomes apparent just how potentially volatile national interpellations can become when we consider first the antagonisms wrought by the uneven development of capitalism, (which tend to fall along national lines), and second, the reservoir of easily recognizable, immediate, and neutral ideological raw materials, such as language and symbols. along with john saul (1979:401), we can recognize that the centre-periphery contradiction may be articulated with the class contradiction and become the primary non-class interpellation in a significant proportion of the world. furthermore, laclau asserts that "classes do exist at the ideological and political level in a process of articulation and not of reduction" (1977:161). he is able to make this assertion by distinguishing between the form and content of an ideology: "the class character of an ideology is given by its form and not by its content" (1977:160). the elements which constitute the nation have a real existence in time and space, but these elements in themselves are neutral. they have no necessary class connotation. class determination is applied to them by means of an articulating principle. i shall now turn to an examination of its various articulations in detail. nationalism and hegemony nationalism is one of the primary forces of unification and integration in capitalist society. the process of nationalist socialization masks class antagonisms, absorbs contradictions, and legitimates the rule of the dominant class. nationalism here is the ideology of the dominant class and, to paraphrase laclau, it is dominant precisely because it is able to interpellate not only members of that class but, also, members of the dominated classes. "a class is hegemonic not so much to the extent that it is able to impose a uniform conception of the world on the rest of society, but to the extent that it can articulate different visions of the world in such a way that their potential antagonism is neutralized" (1977:161). this conception is reminiscent of antonio gramsci's notion of hegemony. for gramsci, hegemony refers to the ability of the dominant class to secure the consent and cohesion of the broad masses; ideology serves to cement and unify the entire social bloc: "the development and expansion of the particular group which has imposed its hegemony are conceived of, and presented, as being the motor force of a universal expansion, of a development of all "national' energies" (1971:182). the dominant ideology, he says (12), is able to "propagate itself throughout society — bringing about not only a unison of political and economic aims, but also intellectual and moral unity, posing all the questions around which the struggle rages not on a corporate but on a "universal' plane, and thus creating the hegemony of a fundamental social group over a series of subordinate groups." thus gramsci recognized the necessity of the dominant class to interpellate subjects by appealing to non-economic sentiments in order to transcend the limits of a single economic class. as miliband (1969) has shown, the dominant class that articulates national consciousness in its ideological discourse has articulated a particularly potent legitimizing force. "narrow" class interests are subordinated to the "national interest," a convenient state of affairs for the national bourgeoisie and the national state. the state, organic intellectuals, and various apparatuses in civil society are involved in the fostering and propagating of nationalist ideology. it is only through a highly developed national consciousness that the dominant class may go so far as to lead the working class into its imperialist adventures. the current terminological confusion between "state" and "nation" is symptomatic of this dominant ideology. according to common usage, the nation is synonymous with the state, and the state with its "subjects" (e.g. "united nations"). this misnomer is not the result of sloppiness; for, politicians are generally cunning in their use of words. rather, it is one of the basic strategies in the modern legitimation of regimes. for new post-colonial states (such as those in africa), created within territorial boundaries which appear artificial once the authority of the colonial power is removed, the creation of a national consciousness plays a much more urgent role (saul, 1979:170). this would explain the concern with "nation-building" which characterizes bourgeois development literature. part of the reason for the preponderance of military regimes in many post-colonial states becomes clear when examined in this light. should the hegemony of the dominant class in these countries falter, the state's repressive power is there to legally enforce the social order. 49 sub-state nationalism as ambercrombie , hill and turner (1980) contend in their critique of the "dominant ideology thesis," however, ideology is more than a mere "social cement" which unambiguously incorporates subordinate classes. rather, ideology has a fundamentally dialectical character. through the interpellation of subjects, it sets up a self/other opposition. national interpellations, therefore, have a dual function: on one hand, as i have outlined in the previous case, nationalism can be synthetic; on the other, nationalism can position subjects in antagonism to the dominant power bloc. the phenomenon of sub-state nationalism is an example of the latter case. earlier, in my discussion of laclau, i concluded that, in addition to class struggle (which is fundamental in any capitalist society) there exists a second contradiction, only intelligible at the level of a concrete social formation, that between the "people" and the power bloc. here the dominated sectors in society would be interpellated not as separate classes but as the "people," counterposed to the dominant power bloc. further, i hypothesized that the people/power bloc struggle may be transformed into a national struggle in situations where there exists (a) a territorial separation between the power bloc and the "people" and (b) a cultural, linguistic, and/or ethnic distinction between the "people" and the power bloc. when this struggle occurs within the boundaries of a single state, it is manifest in the phenomenon of sub-state nationalism. the eritrea-ethiopia conflict will serve as a good illustration of this. eritrea, colonized by the italians in 1896, was quickly transformed into a predominantly capitalist political economy. meanwhile, ethiopia has remained a feudal autocracy, at least up until the 1974 revolution which deposed emperor haile selassie. the federation of these two distinct social 50 formations in 1952 and the subsequent annextion of eritrea by ethiopia in 1962 has resulted in a situation in which the feudal landowning class has remained dominant within the power bloc. this hegemonic fraction not only directly exploits the peasantry at the level of the mode of production, but also subordinates the eritrean workers, petty bourgeoisie, and budding indigenous bourgeoisie. this contradiction has sought expression on the ideological level through the interpellation of agents as the "nation." the leading eritrean factions set about constructing the idea of an eritrean "nation," based upon historical, cultural and territorial attributes — and emphasizing its inherent "right of self-determination" — in order that they might become hegemonic within their "own" state (c.f. tseggai , 1976) . the following example of sub-state national struggle will highlight the role of the petty bourgeoisie, the group most often associated with modern nationalism. i refer again to laclau. he considers the basic feature of the petty bourgeoisie to be its separation from the dominant relations of production in society. its struggle takes place, therefore, not at the level of the dominant relations of production, but at the level of the political and ideological relations that make up the system of domination in that social formation. thus, "...in these sectors, the identity as the "people' plays a much more important role than the identity as a class" (1977:114). moore and latouche (1976) have emphasized the role of the petty bourgeoisie in their examination of quebec nationalism. for these authors, the roots of modern nationalism are found in the "quiet revolution" of the 1960s. under the slogan of maitres chez nous , the liberal government of quebec initiated a process of state nationalization, repatriation, and modernization. by subordinating the church, the dislocation that had existed between the political and ideological institutions was eliminated. in addition to consolidating the role of the petty and middle bourgeoisies of 51 the private sector, state intervention also created a "real" bureaucracy with a technocratic outlook. these fractions saw the logical prolongation of the quiet revolution to be the establishment of a mixed economy in which state capitalism would play a major role. lacking a firm economic base of their own, they sought to use the quebec state as a source of economic power; in doing so they came into conflict with the canadian hegemonic system. they saw political sovereignty as the only solution. the classes-in-struggle here are the quebec petty-bourgeoisie (led by its technocratic fraction) and the canadian bourgeoisie. each class sought to give coherence to its ideological discourse by presenting its class objectives as the consummation of popular objectives rather than narrow economic interests. the result was quite striking. the interpellations of the canadian bourgeoisie, with pierre trudeau as its mouthpiece, took on a distinctly liberal-democratic character and, of course, the petty-bourgeois parti quebecois incorporated nationalism into its ideological discourse, the interpellation to which the leading fractions could best appeal in order to establish their own hegemonic system. nationalism in the periphery the centre-periphery contradiction alluded to earlier presents a new set of problems. this contradiction, attendant upon the uneven development of capitalism, is manifest at the superstructural level in situations of structural dependency as well as direct colonial exploitation. it will obviously leave indigenous classes and fractions in a subordinate position in relation to the metropolitan bourgeoisie. it is not for this reason, however, that it is a contradiction. commonly, in colonial situations, parts of the autochthonous superstructure are instrumentalized for the interests of 52 the colonial power during the conquest and administration of the colony. local leaders had their power considerably enhanced in this manner. furthermore, in post-colonial situations, comprador classes benefit significantly from their role as intermediaries. in these instances, the leading indigenous classes and fractions are incorporated within the power bloc. contradictions inevitably emerge, however, when the indigenous fractions seek to impose their own hegemony but are unable to do so because of the (neo-) colonial structure of the power bloc. in the resultant ideological struggle, the indigenous contenders would certainly not interpellate individuals as class conscious subjects; for this would threaten their own privileged positions within the social formation. rather, they will draw upon the easily recognizable ingredients of territory, tradition, and race in recruiting subjects. the experience of kenya is an interesting case in point. here, as colin leys (1978) has shown, a class of indigenous accumulators had existed from pre-colonial times, based upon the concentration of land and livestock. the colonial state launched a number of these precolonial accumulators on a fresh path of accumulation by appointing them "chiefs" who were enabled to tax and fine their "subjects" and to further accumulate land within the restricted african land areas by engaging in costly litigation. however, their drive toward embourgeoisiement was thwarted by the contradiction with the european estate farmers who had the monopoly over surplus labour, agricultural commodities, and markets, and secondly, with the metropolitan bourgeoisie and its intervention in commodity production. 53 this indigenous class of capital had several strengthening features. it was heavily concentrated in the kikuyu, the largest ethnic group, located at the political and economic centre of kenya. confounded in their bourgeois aspirations as accumulators, the members turned increasingly to education. as a result, kikuyu elites were heavily represented in the state apparatus and, naturally, came to the forefront of the nationalist movement. out of concern for maintaining their central leadership position, and anxious that the nationalist movement, which by now had a mass base of landless peasants, might be transformed into a revolutionary movement, the kikuyu elites articulated an ethnic interpellation. mass oathings, cultural nationalism, culminating in the militancy of "mau-mau," all served to consolidate kikuyu consciousness and strengthen the kikuyu organizational ability to challenge the colonial state. 2 at independence, as leys has observed, the kikuyu capitalist class was in a "position of strategic control over post-colonial re-alignments needed for the next phase of accumulation" (1978:250). since independence, the kenyan bourgeoisie has continued to struggle against the neo-colonial structure of the power bloc. "african socialism," "kenyanization, " and often openly racist policies directed against the asian comprador class have been invoked in order to enlist consent and support from the subordinate classes for the dominant indigenous fractions in their assault upon the barriers of international capital. thus the national interpellation attendant upon the centre-periphery contradiction is not necessarily progressive in spite of the anti-imperialist rhetoric. more often than not, it serves only to replace one form of class rule with another. 54 amilcar cabral (1969), on the other hand, saw national consciousness as a progressive force in the african context. for him, imperialism entailed the negation of the historical process of the dominated sectors through the subjugation of the national productive forces. national struggle was viewed as ...the phenomenon in which a given socio-economic whole rejects the negation of its historical process. in other words, the national liberation of a people is the regaining of the historical personality of that people, its return to history through the destruction of the imperialist domination to which it was subjected (83). in the neo-colonial context, where the petty bourgeoisie is allied with imperialist capital, nationalism is clearly identified as part of the international class struggle. cabral recognized the possibility of the petty bourgeoisie "committing class suicide" and emerging as the revolutionary vanguard of workers and peasants. national interpellations here are revolutionary; they seek to destroy the very structures upon which the exploitation of workers and peasants are built. nationalism and socialism what is the relationship between nationalism and socialism? under what circumstances can nationalism be considered a progressive force? two extreme points of view can be identified in regard to these questions. the first is represented by eric hobsbawm (1977). marxists cannot be nationalists, he claims, since nationalism, by definition, subordinates all other interests to those of the "nation." he advocates the need for marxists to distance themselves from it. a contrary position is taken by regis debray (1977), who argues that marxists must acknowledge their own popular-national roots. communists will never win in france or elsewhere unless they capture national heritage for their own ends. any contradiction 55 between the french tricolour and the red flag is denied. it appears that the disagreement here is one between idealism and pragmatism. while hobsbawm is concerned with the tainting of working class ideology with nationalist infusions, debray sees nationalism as a necessary device for furthering the revolutionary cause. as i have argued, no class can be hegemonic on the basis of class interpellations alone; a hegemonic class must incorporate the "people" into its ideological discourse. national traditions crystallized into immediate and easily recognizable symbols represent a potent force in which the subjects interpellated by them find a strong principle of identity. their relative continuity is in contrast to the historical discontinuities that characterize class structures (laclau, 1977:166). this last point may be useful in an examination of the successes of socialist revolutions. significantly, they have taken place only in countries with low levels of capitalist development and always in conjunction with nationalist movements. russian, chinese, cuban, vietnamese, and mozambican political economies, among others, were characterized in their pre-revolut ionary periods by the simultaneous existence of both capitalist and pre-capitalist modes of production. is it any wonder that the class interpellations of proletarian ideology alone proved to be an insufficient device for mobilizing the masses without the simultaneous interpellation of subjects through nationalist ideology? lenin understood the tactical significance of this and sought to capture nationalist aspirations for revolutionarv ends. this explains all the rhetoric concerning the "right of self-determination. " lenin's assurance of this right to finns, poles and ukrainians allowed him to enlist their support while ensuring that their complacency would prevent their pressing for it (lenin, 1970). 56 the nation will not go away, but has a real existence in time and space. it is, both literally and figuratively speaking, the terrain of class struggle. figuratively, the elements which constitute the nation (territory, tradition, ethnicity and so on) provide a quarry of immediate and easily recognizable ideological raw materials. in themselves, these elements are passive. they receive meaning externally, through articulation into class discourse. hegemony is not achieved at the level of the relations of production, but at the level of political and ideological relations. the working class must present its class interests as the "national interest," and dis-articulate national interpellations from the dominant bourgeois ideology. nationalism is a potent ideology and an important resource for popular mobilization. literally speaking, in spite of internationalism, the masses live in circumscribed national communities. only a national transition to socialism is possible, through the capture of the national state. herein lies an important point of coincidence for socialists and nationalists; for, nationalism often involves a struggle for state power, whether through succession or independence. nationalism may thus lead to a radical break with the interests of the dominant class and develop into an ideology seeking to destroy the fundamental structures of domination in society. nationalism should not, however, be welcomed uncritically into working class discourse. by definition, it subordinates all interests to those of the nation. as such, it is, as hobsbawm (1977) argues, incompatible with marxism. nationalism is, above all, the ideology of class collaboration. its primary historical function has been to mask class antagonisms, absorb contradictions, and legitimate the rule of the dominant class. the ideology of nationalism confronts socialists with serious dilemmas and without a 57 proper understanding of the opportunities and dangers it presents, appropriate political strategies will remain obscure. notes 1. see james blaut's 1982 critique. 2. following connor (1972), "tribalism" is here considered to be a form of nationalism. for more on kikuyu nationalism, see nottingham and roseberg (1966). 3. hobsbawm (1983) argues, however, that nationalism, when combined with working class radicalism, can be a powerful force for progressive social change. he cites the examples of britain during the chartist period and immediately following the second world war. references abercrombie, n. , s. hill and b.s. turner 1980 the dominant ideology thesis . london: allen unwin. althusser, l. 1971 lenin and philosophy . new york: monthly review press. bauer, 0. 1907 "the concept of the "nation"', in bottomore, t.b. and p. goode (eds.), austro-marxism . oxford: clarendon, 1978:102-109. blaut, j. 1982 "nationalism as an autonomous force", science and society 45(l):l-23. cabral, a. 1969 revolution in guinea: an african people's struggle . london: stage 1. connor, w. 1972 "nation-building or nation-destroying?", world politics 24(3):319-355. debray, r. 1977 "marxism and the national question: interview with regis debray", new left review 105:25-41. gramsci, a. 1971 selections from the prison notebooks . new york: international publishers. 58 hobsbawm, e. 1977 "some reflections on "the break-up of britain'", new left review 105:3-24. 1983 "falklands fallout", marxism today , january. laclau, e. 1977 politics and ideology in marxist theory . london: nlb. lenin, v.i. 1970 "the right of nations to self-determination", in questions of national policy and proletarian internationalism . moscow: progress publishers . 1975 what is to be done? peking: foreign languages publishing house. leys, c. 1978 "capital accumulation, class formation and dependency — the significance of the kenyan case", in miliband, r. and j. saville (eds.), the socialist register 1978 . london: the merlin press: 241-266. miliband, r. 1969 the state in capitalist society . london: weidenfeld and nicolson. moore, m-f, and d. latouche 1976 "from cultural time to political space: quebec nationalism as an instrument of hegemonic control". international political science association (unpublished). nairn, t. 1977 the break-up of britain: crisis and neo-nationalism . london: nlb. navari, c. 1981 "the origins of the nation-state", in l. tivey (ed.), the nation-state: the formation of modern politics . oxford: martin robertson: 13-38. nottingham, j. and c.g. roseberg, jr. 1966 the myth of mau-mau: nationalism in kenya . nairobi: east african publishing house. poulantzas, n. 1974 fascism and dictatorship: the third international and the problem of fascism . london: nlb. 1978 state, power, socialism . london: nlb. renan, e. 1954 "what is a nation?", in w. ebenstein (ed.), modern political thought: the great issues . new york: rinehart : 753-766. renner, k. 1917 "the development of the national idea", in bottomore, t.b. and p. goode (eds.), austro-marxism. oxford: clarendon, 1978:118-125. saul, j. 1979 "the dialectic of class and tribe", in the state and revolution in eastern africa . london: heinemann:391-a23. 1979 "the state in post-colonial societies: tanzania", in the state and revolution in eastern africa . stalin, j. 1953 works , vol. ii. moscow: foreign languages publishing house. tseggai, a. 1976 "the case for eritrean national independence", black scholar 7:20-27. tudjman, f. 1981 nationalism in contemporary europe . new york: columbia university press. 60 | 99 power, the state and global politics after the great freeze:towards a new articulation? randall germain1 introduction in the social sciences, scholarly disciplines can be prompted to re-evaluate the analytical traction of their central concepts by abrupt changes in how the object of their scholarship is organized. the disciplines of international relations (ir) and international political economy (ipe) have long faced such pressure. for example, some see the interwar years and the great depression as the precursor not only to the empirical development of american hegemony, but also as a key spur to the emergence of realism as a central method of apprehending power (carr, 1946; schmidt, 1998; cox, 2000). several decades later, scholars took the breakdown of the bretton woods system as a prompt both to re-evaluate the utility of realism as a theoretical lens for ir and ipe, and as a signal that the post-war structure of the global political economy was itself entering a period of ‘after hegemony’, to use the title of a significant text from that era (keohane and nye, 1977; keohane, 1984). this last debate over american decline of power was seemingly resolved in the closing years of the 20th century, amid the aftermath of the end of the cold war, the collapse of the soviet union and the re-assertion of american power (cox, 2001). the uni-polar era had arrived even as governance was becoming increasingly globalized (scholte, 2000; ikenberry, mastanduno and wohlforth, 2009). the financial crisis of 2007-2009 has brought this paradoxical resolution into question. the central features of the crisis include both domestic and international dynamics: regulatory failure among leading 1  randall germain is professor and chair of the department of political science at carleton university (ottawa, canada). he is the author of global politics and financial governance and the international organization of credit: states and global finance in the world-economy. he can be reached at: randall_germain@carleton.ca power, the state and global politics after the great freeze: towards a new articulation? 100 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times financial powers (most critically the united states (u.s.) but others as well); financial innovation among banks, investment banks and nonbank financial institutions that built up significant systemic risk; macroeconomic imbalances at the global level that included trade and capital account disequilibria alongside currency misalignments; inappropriate monetary policies; high sovereign debt loads; and ultimately massive institutional failure. i have elsewhere labelled this crisis the great freeze, because one of its principal consequences was a steady constriction of credit markets from the summer of 2007 that ultimately resulted in a near total blockage–or flash freeze–after lehman brothers went bust in september 2008 (germain, 2010). the twelve months following this spectacular bankruptcy saw the harshest contraction of global economic activity since the worst days of the great depression. indeed, 2009 is the only year since 1945 that the global economy as a whole has been in recession (imf, 2009). this article uses this crisis as the occasion to explore the changing global articulation of power. power in ir and ipe is usually viewed in relational terms, as the ability to effect change in actor’s behaviour, where actor a gets actor b to do what it might not otherwise would (baldwin, 2002; schmidt, 2005). power here is understood as the capacity–derived most often from control over material capabilities that translate into instruments of pressure–of one actor to influence (directly or indirectly) the decisions of another actor. in contrast, i deploy an understanding of power that is more structural in orientation, derived from the work of susan strange, who argues that it is the structural determinants of power that are more important to understand than the relational determinants (strange, 1988b). on this basis, strange disagreed with those who, in the mid-1980s, viewed the global political economy to be entering a period marked by american decline (strange, 1987). the argument i advance below takes it cue from her framework to argue that the new global articulation of power suggested by the great freeze is both highly fluid and relatively opaque or ambiguous. this is so because even as some key structural determinants of power have become hollowed out, other elements remain intact while yet more have yet to emerge fully. the result will be a period of struggle waged around and through the principal organizational pillars of the global political economy for control over the very foundations of political order. the outcome of this struggle will not be resolved any time soon. | 101 power, the state and global politics the idea that we can measure power in global politics has long been attractive to scholars, even as they have acknowledged the immense difficulties of the task (knorr, 1975; kirshner, 1995; hardt and negri, 2000; andrews, 2006). here i wish to follow the british ipe scholar susan strange in asking how changes in the structural determinants of power help us to understand select contemporary trends. strange developed her understanding of power against prevailing views, largely american in origin, that saw in the 1980s a sharp and steep decline in the ability of the u.s. to shape the international economic order. at the time, ir and ipe scholars were concerned primarily with the ability of the u.s. to compel its long-time allies to follow american preferences and accommodate themselves to american interests as they had for much of the bretton woods period. from across the theoretical spectrum, this was most often articulated as the erosion of international regimes, whose main cause was a decline in american power (block ,1977; gilpin, 1981; krasner, 1983). in contrast, strange argued that such measurements of american power were at the very least inaccurate, and at worst entirely misleading (strange, 1983; 1987). she noted that even as the share of american gross domestic product (gdp) in relation to global gdp had declined, the control of american corporations over key international markets remained high and was even (in certain industries such as services) growing. for strange, the key question was not the weight of the american economy in the global economy, but the control exerted by american corporations and lawmakers over global markets (strange, 1988; cf nizan and bichler, 2009). here she pointed out that this control was not under threat from global competition; in fact, global competition was defined and shaped inexorably by the demands, preferences and resources of american corporations. in short, the structure of global competition was determined (or controlled) by american interests, even if these interests were themselves no longer expressly related to the territorial borders of the u.s. she sometimes styled these interests in the form of a ‘transnational’ or ‘american’ empire’ (strange, 1988b; 1989). it was this structural capacity to control the global economic agenda which counted in the power sweepstakes, not where widgets were actually produced. and such power at its heart was constituted by a complicated amalgam of public and private authority. at one level, for strange, the global articulation of power in the 1980s was constituted by an iron triangle of inordinate (american) military power, an inter-state system that refracted and radiated america’s govpower, the state and global politics after the great freeze: towards a new articulation? 102 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times ernmental power throughout its most important elements, and the dominance of an ideational framework that privileged american principles and ideals. here strange disagreed with two of the strongest proponents of the argument that america was no longer ascendant. from a realist perspective, robert gilpin argued that american power, measured as its ability to compel its allies to make contributions to the pax americana, was in terminal decline (gilpin, 1981). and from a critical historical materialist perspective, robert cox argued that the u.s. was no longer able to direct a hegemonic structure of world order (cox, 1987). both gilpin and cox, albeit for quite different reasons, pointed to the inability of the u.s. to fashion consensus or accommodate its allies’ needs as part of the negotiations necessary to maintain a benevolent (from an american point of view) global economic system. for them, a neo-liberal (or hyper-liberal, to use the term initially coined by cox) world signalled the end of american dominance. strange had a different answer to the question of american decline, relying instead on a careful distinction between relational and structural power. relational power was of course above all about the u.s. being able to coerce or compel its allies and competitors to undertake particular courses of action. here she acknowledged that this form of power waxed and waned with global economic circumstances, and was entirely dependent upon very specific and particular contexts. on this reading, from the early 1970s until the late 1980s it did appear that u.s. relational power was in retreat. the instrumental capacity of the u.s. to exert its willpower seemed to have eroded, or at the very least to be under severe stress.2 however, what was significant for strange’s counter-intuitive analysis was the capacity of some states to set the rules by which others would have to play the ‘great power’ game. in other words, for strange the key to understanding who actually ‘had’ power lay not in determining who could prevail in specific decisions, but who could set the rules by which such decisions were made in the first place (strange, 1988b). in her estimation at the time, it was still american political leaders who had it within their grasp to provide such leadership. even though not all decisions went america’s way, they were made under american rules that reflected american interests. this social fact also called attention to the global reach of american domestic political conflicts, which had a disproportionate impact on international regulatory developments. beyond 2  for strange, however, this decline in relational power was predominantly caused by u.s. domestic politics, by an inability on the part of the american political system to organize itself effectively so as to project and use its (structural) power appropriately (strange, 1987). | 103 this, there were also some decisions that were simply not taken because the u.s. in effect blocked the way; such ‘non-decisions’ as she called them were also the product of american structural power (strange, 1986). in strange’s view, this ability to set the rules derived from several sources, some public or state-centred and some centred more in the operation of the (capitalist) economic system. the american state still maintained a considerable military edge over its closest rivals, which was bolstered by the continued reluctance of european states to devote adequate resources to defending themselves. but equally importantly, american corporations continued to dominate transnational production systems, which were a principal source of high value profits. the superior innovative capacities of these firms, bolstered by statesponsored military research, bestowed onto certain segments of america’s ‘private’ economy an unalloyed competitive advantage. as well, american ideas about how to organize economic activity (and its associated set of political values and ideals) complemented these advantages, and held a global appeal. and finally, and for her critically, the u.s. (through its government, its markets and its private institutions) had a lock-grip over the organization and operation of the world’s monetary and financial system (strange, 1987; 1988; cf may, 1996). for strange, all that was required for america to actually exercise its structural power was a willingness to act politically in a manner congruent with its underlying power capacities.3 this understanding of power ties together the capacity of the state with the operation of private institutions and the inter-state system to provide for strange a structural reading that suggests where power actually resides in the global political economy. because power is about the capacity to decide agendas, it is not directly related to the ability of a to compel b to undertake a particular course of action; rather, it is related to the context of agency, which has two levels: (1) the capacity of a to convince b that its menu of choice involves x, y and z and nothing else; and (2) the capacity of a to influence this menu of choice either directly, through its own ability to compel the acceptance of the menu, or indirectly, because the majority of the elements of the menu remain in a dependent relationship to a. this kind of power, which she called structural power, belonged as a property to the u.s. throughout the period of supposed american decline. to highlight the exercise of such power, strange (1988b) considered the example of the international debt crisis of the early 1980s, when several countries ran into significant debt repayment problems. instruc3  by the end of her life, strange had finally concluded that the u.s. was in fact unwilling to act in a manner congruent with its own ‘structural’ interests (strange, 1998). power, the state and global politics after the great freeze: towards a new articulation? 104 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times tively for her, only those countries with close ties to the u.s. were able to work towards a resolution that involved creditors booking losses on their assets within the framework of an overall imf-sanctioned debt recovery scheme. crucially, it was the u.s. which was able to dictate these rules of engagement, and it was these rules which all indebted countries had to follow if they wanted debt relief on a multilateral scale. american power here was omnipresent but structural, reflecting its pole position within the inter-state system rather than a calculated exploitation of its own instrumental power. strange’s view of structural power–and indeed power in general–is not of course without problems, many of which are connected to her idiosyncratic view of theory in ir and ipe. some of these are noted in a volume dedicated to engaging with the corpus and legacy of her work (lawton, rosenau and verdun, 2000). we could, for example, take her to task for developing taxonomies rather than theoretical insights (cohen, 2000); for not working through the tension in her work between materialism and idealism (guzzini, 2000); for failing to overcome the de facto analytical barriers between economics and politics (cutler, 2000); and for refusing to socialize adequately her fundamentally empiricist reading of knowledge, ideology and ultimately power itself (tooze, 2000). what these critiques of strange’s view on power suggest is that she offers an insightful but yet truncated conception of power, which only partially connects the foundations of power to the way in which it is exercised. most importantly, strange seems oddly reluctant to reflect theoretically on her insights, and determined to restrict her theoretical reflections to the terrain of empirical falsification. this is perhaps due to her ambiguous acceptance of the place of positivism within the social sciences, and to her ultimate unwillingness to modify its evidence-based evaluative precepts (may, 1996; palan, 1999; cutler, 2000; tooze, 2000). even with these caveats, however, her conception of structural power offers a useful framework to consider how the global articulation of power has been affected by the great freeze. this is because it directs our attention to two key developments: (1) the changing role of the state in regulating financial markets; and (2) the rise of emerging market economies and their new role in setting the agenda of global economic decision-making. on both counts, what emerges from such a consideration is a recognition that established patterns of decision-making are unravelling, even if new patterns have yet to be firmly established. each development will be reviewed below. | 105 power and the state: financial regulation the key authorities involved in global financial regulation are american and european officials together with their counterparts in international regulatory institutions. this should not be surprising, as historically these states sit astride the world’s deepest and most liquid financial markets. what is noteworthy from the perspective of considering the effects of the great freeze is to observe how systematically these states are moving forward to intervene more forcefully in the operation of financial markets under their jurisdiction. states are renewing their authority to set the agenda of global finance. in the u.s., two major directions of change are developing: in the organization and logic of supervision; and in the range and extent of supervision. each of these regulatory changes will increase the degree of state intervention in its financial system, and thereby encourage other states to intervene more forcefully in their financial systems. the first major change concerns the organization of financial supervision and in particular the question of whether such supervision should be sectoral or unified in scope and scale. while the u.s. may be an extreme case with its plethora of financial regulatory bodies, the logic of sectoral supervision has a considerable historical record (russell, 2008).4 the great freeze has brought into sharp relief how problematic such a fragmented regulatory apparatus is when set within the context of an integrated set of financial markets. here the great freeze has unquestionably tipped the balance in favour of a more strongly unified supervisory framework. in the u.s., the obama administration’s efforts to recalibrate u.s. financial regulation have resulted in the passage of the dodd-frank bill, which among other things identifies the federal reserve board (fed) as the principal overseer of systemic risk. a combined council of regulators will further close many of the remaining gaps within the u.s. system. equally important are new powers given to regulators to wind-up insolvent firms, and to compel banks to limit or restrict their proprietary treading units under the so-called volcker rule. this rule prescribes how banks are to capitalize their special investment vehicles, and how much they are allowed 4  financial markets have historically been differentiated by the kinds of instruments that comprise them and their institutional makeup. regulation has evolved in line with how these markets operate and what kinds of products they generate. this has traditionally been understood in terms of key pillars, most importantly banking, equities, insurance and pensions. almost everywhere each pillar has spawned its own regulatory apparatus, together with a few more recent developments such as organized futures markets. see germain (2010) and porter (2005) for an historical account. power, the state and global politics after the great freeze: towards a new articulation? 106 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times to invest in hedge funds and private equity firms. together with the vetting powers which the new consumer protection agency will have for financial instruments, the dodd-frank bill will push the government to cast a much heavier footprint over the organization and operation of the american financial system.5 a heavier footprint is also taking shape in europe, where british and e.u. authorities are moving to give the state a much stronger presence within their respective financial systems. in the u.k., a major reorganization of financial supervision has been undertaken to strip the financial services authority of its supervisory role and to relocate it within the bank of england.6 this has been further supported by the recommendations made by an independent commission struck by the new british government to examine how to strengthen the british financial system in light of the great freeze (economist 2011: april 16th–22nd). this commission–known as the vickers’ commission–has recommended that british banks organize themselves to insulate or ring fence their domestic u.k. retail arms from their investment and commercial banking operations. in other words, the (british) state looks set to intervene more forcefully in how financial institutions active in the u.k. are actually run. similar albeit weaker trajectories are underway in the e.u.7 of course, none of these developments have yet to be fully implemented as of the time of writing of this manuscript, and there are some who doubt that their impact will be as argued here. such scepti5  other provisions in the ‘wall street reform and consumer protection act’ include bringing all major financial institutions–whether bank or non-bank–within the purview of federal regulation, more closely regulating derivatives trading and hedge funds, limiting the proprietary trading prerogatives of banks, and providing the federal government with a more clearly specified way of closing down insolvent financial institutions. see http://www. opencongress.org/bill/111-h4173/show (accessed august 6th, 2010). 6  among the proposals published by the british government in july 2010 were to return both macroand microprudential supervisory responsibilities to the bank of england, and to create a new consumer protection agency to absorb the institutional responsibilities of the financial services authority (which will effectively be gutted). these proposals arise out of the turner review–the official enquiry into how the uk’s supervisory arrangements failed to contain the fallout from the great freeze–as well as the political preferences of the conservative and liberal-democrat partners in the new coalition government. see http:// www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/other/turner_review.pdf (accessed may 04, 2009) and http://www. hm-treasury.gov.uk/consult_financial_regulation.htm (accessed august 06, 2010). 7  the e.u. struck a high-level committee to examine the crisis and how to respond to it, chaired by jacques de larosière, a former managing director of the imf who also played a leading role in preparing the e.u. for monetary union. in addition to proposing e.u.-wide risk and supervisory councils, this panel recommended reviewing accounting standards and basel ii (especially its capital adequacy requirements), tighter regulation of derivatives trading and the shadow banking system, and the harmonization of deposit insurance schemes on an e.u.-wide basis. see http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/finances/docs/ de_larosiere_report_en.pdf (accessed on july 29, 2009). | 107 cism however should be treated with caution, for two reasons. first, across europe and the u.s., banks have been recapitalized and are being forced to hold much more capital in relation to their lending and proprietary operations than prior to 2008. swiss banks, for example, are being compelled by their government to hold nearly 20% capital buffers whereas prior to 2008 they were capitalized at nearer to 7%.8 the british and dutch governments are arguing strenuously with the e.u. that they should be allowed to impose higher capital requirements than the new basel iii rules. here, minimum tier 1 capital ratios are being raised from a pre-crisis requirement of 4% to at least 7%, with a further tranche of easily accessible capital at 3%. furthermore, somewhere between 20 and 30 globally-active financial institutions are about to be categorized by the basel committee on banking supervision as ‘systemically important financial institutions’, or sifis, which will need to hold extra capital buffers above and beyond normal operating guidelines of between 1.5-2.5%, due to their perceived systemic importance. no one should doubt that increased capital ratios, which influence how much banks can lend, are on the way, and that these will have an impact on banking operations. it is through the mechanism of increased capital ratios that major banks are having their activities more closely supervised, and similar consequences are in train for other regulatory developments.9 the second reason why sceptics should be cautious relates to the politics of financial regulation. for much of the post-war period, financial regulation in the rich economies has been debated and conducted in a kind of segregated, insulated bubble, removed for the most part from popular (and democratic) pressures (helleiner, 1994; strange, 1998; porter, 2005; wood, 2005; germain, 2010). this is no longer the case. from the tea party phenomenon in the u.s. to the role played by populist and nationalist political parties in scandinavia in addressing the 2010-2011 european debt crisis to the refusal of icelandic voters to sanction an imf bailout, financial supervision and the politics of finance have moved to centre stage in national politics. and while this development has yet to fully play itself out, all indications are that the relatively insulated nature of financial politics has for the moment become impossible to maintain (thirkwell-white, 2009). 8  see http://online.wsj.com/article/sb10001424052748704631504575531222507779044.html (accessed october 15, 2010). 9  a summary of the basel iii can be found at http://www.bis.org/press/p100912.htm (accessed october 15, 2010). power, the state and global politics after the great freeze: towards a new articulation? 108 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times and yet a word of caution is in order. the state that is at the centre of this reassertion of authority is not itself entirely distinct from private authority. in all three jurisdictions examined here, private financial institutions have over the 1990s won a strengthened degree of involvement in the debate over how the financial system should be regulated. in the u.s. this is because of the porous and fragmented nature of the american political system, which has long been open to lobbying efforts from private firms. in the u.k. this is because of the historic ties between the city, the exchequer and the bank of england, and the single-minded determination of successive governments to maintain london’s role as a leading international financial centre. and in the e.u., although the influence of the private sector is not as strong as in the u.s. or u.k., it has grown over the years due to the sheer increase in the weight of financial affairs in the overall economy of europe, as well as the organizational efforts of europe’s leading banks to lobby on their own behalf in brussels (underhill and zhang, 2008; king and sinclair, 2003). geoffrey underhill (2000) is surely correct to note that there is a growing condominium between state and market in today’s global political economy. here, it is helpful to follow susan strange’s understanding of the intimate relationship between public and private forms of authority, as she recognizes that this relationship is part of a continuum whose balance changes over time. in her last major publication, she argued that markets and private authority had outrun state authority to the point where only an almost complete collapse of confidence in the capacity of private authority to effectively organize global finance could catalyze state authorities to reassert their traditional grip on financial systems (strange, 1998, p. 190). this collapse came upon us in 2008, when it fell to public authorities alone to stem the tide, which was estimated by one respected analyst to cost nearly us$14 trillion (haldane and alessandri, 2009). so, while the precise nature of the new balance between public and private authority has yet to be stabilized, there should be no questions about the direction of change: in each of the world’s major financial markets, the role of the state is being up-scaled, with the result that state authority is being re-articulated to exert more structural power over how financial markets are organized. we may say that the agenda-setting capacity of the state has been re-asserted over financial markets, even if this reassertion is uneven and subject to private sector push-back. | 109 power and the state system: emerging market economies and the balance of power many scholars and commentators have observed that global politics, understood primarily through the lens of the inter-state system, has been in a period of transformation (e.g. jacques, 2009; halliday, 2009). on the debit side of this ledger is the weakening grip of western powers, symbolized by the economic troubles of the u.s. on the credit side of this ledger are the emerging market economies, symbolized most importantly by the rise of the bric countries but including other non-g7 countries whose economies and international profiles have been growing rapidly. for these countries the early years of the 21st century have at last brought dynamic economic growth and public sector reform that has enabled them to acquire the material vestiges of real power: their economies have hummed; their trade has skyrocketed; their companies have gone global; their reserves have been bolstered; and their armies have become better equipped. in short, enough emerging market and other non-g-7 economies have grown in relation to the historically-powerful countries that talk of a new and emerging international balance of power is warranted. following from our earlier analysis, however, we can ask whether scholars are not committing the same analytical error that strange reprimanded her peers for making over two decades ago? a critical example is the accumulation of international reserves by the bric countries, which is often considered a key barometer of the growing power of emerging market economies. for strange, this would be a clear example of how structural power works, because the stockpiling of foreign currency reserves denominated in u.s. dollars confirms three important features of american structural power: (1) america still has the world’s confidence as the pre-eminent provider of global liquidity; (2) there are at this time no serious rivals to accumulating and using u.s. dollars as an international reserve currency, even if those accumulating such reserves complain about the injustice of it; and (3) whereas bric and other countries have to earn their liquidity (which are what such reserves represent), america can simply create its liquidity. it is hard to think of a better indicator of structural power than this, what strange (1987, p. 569) in her own time called super-exorbitant privilege. nevertheless, since 2009 chinese officials (often but not always supported by other bric countries) have stepped up calls for the development of a non-dollar-denominated international reserve currency unit. what would be needed for such a development to occur? on the governpower, the state and global politics after the great freeze: towards a new articulation? 110 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times ment side, it would require holders of large dollar-denominated reserves to make their own currencies completely convertible in order to allow for their use abroad as trade and investment vehicles. in other words, emerging market economies such as china, russia, india and brazil need to liberalize their current and capital accounts to the point where others will have the necessary confidence to diversify into these currencies and use them as genuine reserve currencies. as these governments tighten their hold on undesired movements of capital into and out of their economies (as indeed many emerging market economies are doing), such a possibility seems more remote today than at any time in the past twenty years.10 indeed, one only has to look back to the experience of japan during the 1980s and its antipathy towards internationalizing the yen to understand the deep political forces that constrain governments which otherwise might challenge existing reserve currencies.11 but on the private or market side of the equation the forces supporting the continuing use of the u.s. dollar are equally powerful. private firms and market actors demand not just that governments relinquish control over currencies in order that they may be used for purposes dictated by the interests of private accumulation, but also that there be ample liquidity in order that the temporary use of a currency (as a store of value, for example) does not become a permanent and unwanted longterm investment. for this condition to obtain, governments need to adopt a liberal view of their currencies, most importantly by freeing their use abroad and by abjuring their use as a developmental tool. there also needs to be an adequate supply of the currency in question. absent suitable liberalization and an ample supply, private firms and markets will not have the confidence to use a currency (or facilitate its use), and will therefore minimize how they employ it. 10  over the past two years, countries including china, south korea, singapore, brazil and turkey have joined russia and india to implement controls on the inflow of capital as an important tool in the battle to protect their economies from currency appreciation and, to a lesser extent, over-heating. these controls are now supported by the imf, which has shifted its long-standing blanket opposition to capital controls. see for example http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/11/business/global/11capital.html?_r=1&ref=business (accessed december 5, 2010). 11  the basic problem faced by a country possessing an international reserve currency is that it loses its ability to hold onto direct control of its exchange rate, and thereby the ability to use its currency as a developmental tool. by its very nature an international reserve currency is widely dispersed and intensely traded, and this compromises the ability of its issuing government to control its value. of course, there are significant advantages to the issuer of an international reserve currency, most importantly the ability to fund its government’s activities cheaply because of the international demand for its government bonds (which are the chief component of international reserves). to most developing and emerging market countries, however, the benefits of issuing a reserve currency are far outweighed by the disadvantages, hence their reluctance to allow their currency to act as such. | 111 and this is where we are in 2011 with respect to the future of the american dollar as an international reserve currency. many countries (and not just bric countries) are uncomfortable with the international role of the u.s. dollar. by making it cheap for the u.s. to fund its budgetary and current account deficits (what economists often call seigniorage), using the dollar as the international reserve currency retards the adjustment process the u.s. needs to undertake to bring its trade, current and capital accounts into a more sustainable balance. it also prolongs the vulnerability other countries experience with respect to having to follow or react to america’s monetary policies. yet, the world is not rushing out to adopt the rouble or the rupee or the yuan as reserve currencies, simply because they cannot. and neither can they freely use the pound sterling, japanese yen, swiss franc or, most significantly, the euro. there are simply not enough of the former to be thrust into this role, while the political mismatch between the issuance of euro-denominated debt and who controls its value ultimately means that an enormous question mark hangs over precisely how robust an international role the euro can play. by default, the dollar will be required for use as an international reserve currency until well into the middle decades of the 21st century.12 so, the accumulation of a mountain of u.s. dollar-denominated reserve assets by bric and other countries such as japan does not prima facie indicate the decline of american power. in relational terms, to return to susan strange’s argument, it may indeed appear that the u.s. now has serious rivals to its monetary power. however, in structural terms, its challengers are hobbled by the framework of practices that have developed over the past decades that have been entirely cantered on american interests and needs. the u.s. has held a firm grasp on monetary and financial power since 1945, and this has allowed it to build up 12 the problems of the euro zone in 2010-11 have clarified how significant the political mismatch is in europe, possibly dealing a fatal blow to a global role for the euro. two developments could conceivably undermine the future role of the u.s. dollar. one development might be a genuine budgetary (and therefore political) crisis in the u.s., involving both default and devaluation. if this happens all bets are off. the august 2011 downgrade u.s. debt by standard and poor’s sets up an interesting confrontation between the u.s. government and american credit rating agencies in this respect, but it is difficult to see quite what the practical outcome of this move will be, since a large part of these agencies’ role in the global financial system derives in part from their explicit (american) government sanctioned role in rating government and private debt (sinclair 2005). moreover, it is difficult to identify america’s budgetary woes as a ‘debt’ problem when in fact its effective tax rate is less than 25% of gdp, well below the oecd average of 35%. the other development might be the development of sdrs into a kind of proper international reserve currency. even if this were to happen it would still not address the needs of private firms and market actors for an internationally-tradable currency, which an sdr is most manifestly not. international reserve currencies need to be accepted and used by both public and private agents; this accounts for how difficult they are to establish as well as why they take so long to fade. power, the state and global politics after the great freeze: towards a new articulation? 112 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times an historic reservoir of influence and power that will not be easily dislodged.13 yet, the balance of economic power has not been entirely static over the post-war era, and even though american firms and indeed the american government together constitute a significant element of the world’s monetary and financial system, they are not as ubiquitous an element as they once were. the u.s. has been to a certain extent decentred from the structure of financial governance over the past decade and a half, so that even though it is still an immensely powerful actor it must now negotiate the framework of this structure with other actors and their concerns (germain, 2010). it is this political fact which marks out the salience of current governance developments, where the interaction of international political relations with the demands of regulatory change are generating a set of issues whose importance is both novel and potentially long-lasting. structural power and political order two important sets of long-term structural consequences have been set in motion. one set of consequences revolves around the role of the state in the global financial system. as states–in both the developed and developing economies–move to re-calibrate how they intervene in the organization and operation of financial systems, their centrality within the globalized structure of financial governance will grow. the nationstate is not simply important here because it is the instrument through which all regulation actually gets implemented. even more critically, it is the only institution which can generate financial regulation that is appropriate and suitable for its own economy. emerging market economies–and the bric countries in particular–will here take their cue from what the u.s. and e.u. states actually do to impose tighter regulations on financial institutions; a slightly less globalized financial system is most likely to be the outcome. this is so because higher capital requirements, more capital controls and more tightly circumscribed operating environments will inevitably generate a global financial system less hospitable 13  many of the themes canvassed in the above paragraphs can be found also in a recent volume on the future of the u.s. dollar (helleiner and kirshner, 2009). interestingly, the experts in that volume agree to disagree on the future of the dollar. | 113 to what i elsewhere describe as deep globalization.14 this does not mean that globalization as we know it is coming to an end, merely that there will be less of it going forward. we will move from a highly globalized world to a world in which the pull of the nation-state away from deep globalization is more clearly felt. intersecting with the strengthening of the state is the second set of consequences, namely the refashioning of the inter-state balance of power. we have seen how this works in terms of the role of the u.s. dollar as an international reserve currency: its role is being eroded and brought into question, yet with no alternative in sight. in other words, one of the critical foundations of political order for the global political economy is entering a period of intense uncertainty. we have not witnessed such a situation since the inter-war period. strange might have observed here that the structural power of the u.s. is changing only very slowly, while its instrumental power to shape decisions directly is increasingly haphazard, reflecting the volatility of circumstances (including significantly an increasingly unstable domestic political landscape). what is especially important at the current moment, however, is that the global economic decision-making agenda does not yet appear to have ceded substantial power to emerging market economies, despite for example their accumulation of enormous reserves of u.s. dollars. structural power remains asymmetrically concentrated in american institutions and subject to american rules. how much longer will this remain so? if we return to strange’s conceptual formulation of structural power, we can recall that it relied on american military dominance, the continuing dominance of american ideals and values, and the place of american financial institutions, markets and government in the global financial system. if these fundamental elements of the global political order become further constrained or even undermined, then those adopting strange’s position would have to concede that the structural power of the u.s. is weakening. what is the status of these elements of global political order? the u.s. continues to outspend the rest of the world combined on defence, and it continues to be the only state with the military capacity 14  deep globalization here refers to the intensity of liberalization efforts which have driven economic growth since the end of the bretton woods era in the early 1980s. globalization– understood as increasing levels of economic integration among major economies together with the emergence of a global political consensus organized around neo-liberal principles– has been sustained by the global reach of liberalization, and it is precisely this which is coming unstuck as a consequence of the great freeze. this theme is explored below and in some detail in germain (2010: ch. 6). power, the state and global politics after the great freeze: towards a new articulation? 114 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times to fight a two-front war. yet, its military might is no longer unrivalled, and the build up of military assets by china could be viewed by some as a significant challenge. but it must be acknowledged that the only potential military rival to the u.s. is china, and so long as european states continue to rely disproportionally on american security via nato it is unlikely that the military dominance of the u.s. will collapse any time soon. while the idea of a uni-polar moment may be overstating the case, we are in many respects well short of a genuine multi-polar inter-state system (ikenberry, mastanduno and wohlfarth, 2009). what should be of more concern to scholars of global power is the condition of american values and ideals, which support in so many ways the entrenched american-centred global economic agenda. here it is interesting that one of the consequences of the great freeze has been the severe questioning of liberalization as the default ideational template for global capitalism. there are still no serious alternatives to organizing the global economy along capitalist lines. what has changed, however, is the degree to which capitalism needs to be organized along liberal (or neo-liberal) lines. here liberalization as an ethos is now subject to two important charges: (1) it is unsustainable as a form of economic regulation; and (2) that state-organized capitalism is in fact more stable than liberal capitalism. and while neither of these charges are categorical or themselves without controversy, they have undermined the persuasive power of liberalization’s ideologues to spread their gospel. from europe to asia to latin america and africa, liberalism is in retreat, and this has undermined the ideational supports for the operationalization of american structural power. finally, the great freeze began in the u.s. financial system, even if it was aided and abetted by global forces and dynamics. has it also challenged the centrality of the american financial system to the global financial system? this question is difficult to assess at this moment in time. on one hand, even with the carnage wreaked by the great freeze, american financial markets remain the deepest and most liquid in the world. and while american banks and financial institutions no longer remain the world’s largest by many ratios, they continue to be among the most profitable and innovative, and equally important they continue to provide unparalleled access for foreigners to american capital markets. their centrality to the organization and operation of the global financial system will not soon disappear. and because both u.s. markets and financial institutions remain key components of the global financial system, so too does the american government. its image and halo may | 115 be tarnished and dented, but it continues to possess a definite and considerable weight in how the global financial system runs. this sets up an interesting scholarly debate between those, like myself, who now emphasize the extent of change in the landscape of global political economy, and those who remain impressed by the continuity of capitalist relations as the key factor that explains current trajectories. at one level this is a debate about the relative weight to assign to competing explanatory variables: are we focusing on state versus class; public versus private; or global versus national? at another level it is about the grounds of adjudication: does more regulatory control also mean that state authorities are somehow in ascendancy, when in fact the dividing line between public and private authority may be impossible to identify? and at still another level, it is about the means used to understand and verify the categories we are using: do we appeal to ‘evidence’ or ‘theory’ (‘beliefs’?) when it comes to establishing the fundamental basis of our arguments? there are no easy or clear answers to these questions; thus such debates will long maintain their traction. yet here again it is worthwhile to return to the work of susan strange, for she offers at the very least a way of negotiating some of the hurdles thrown up by these debates. for strange, who understood that there were several ways of apprehending all important events, the question of the significance of current changes would need to be addressed within the context of cui bono, or for whose advantage? this context almost always provides a clear causal chain to follow, even if the measurement of ‘advantage’ can be a bit messy. in the case of changes to financial regulation, it appears that the biggest beneficiaries of higher capital requirements, increased capital controls and less liberalization are states in general and major developed states in particular, because it is they who will have to spend less to bail out their financial institutions if regulatory reforms are successful. of course, private financial institutions should also benefit from these reforms, but the weight of advantage lies with states. similarly, the unevenness of the changes outlined above regarding the inter-state balance of power, while not directly challenging the structural power of the u.s., certainly begin to undermine the ideational core of that power. over time, this will have the effect of eroding from within the dominant position of the u.s. in the global political economy. it is for these reasons that i can argue that the global articulation of power within the global political economy is entering a period of power, the state and global politics after the great freeze: towards a new articulation? 116 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times uncertainty as established patterns of power erode and new patterns emerge unevenly. there is no question that the relational power of the u.s. is eroding: firms from emerging market economies are challenging american firms in some areas, while the ability of the u.s. state to dictate its preferences onto a pliant world no longer holds. at the same time, the agenda setting ability of american authorities, both public and private, has not entirely deteriorated, and in some areas remains substantial. this is what continues to generate america’s continuing structural power. the interesting aspect of this situation, from the perspective of scholars of ir and ipe, will be how it plays out over the medium term, when the economic and security capabilities of the u.s. seem to be moving in opposite directions. the prediction i would make in late 2011 is that as nation-states reassert their authority over their financial systems and intervene to blunt the advance of globalization, the entire fabric of the global political economy is becoming rebalanced, ushering in a new inter-state balance of power and a new era in the history of global politics that is no longer centrally defined by the hegemonic position of the u.s. references andrews, david m., (ed). (2006). international monetary power. ithaca: cornell university press. baldwin, david. (2002). “power and international relations,” in walter carlsnaes, thomas risse and beth a. simmons (eds.), handbook of international relations. london: sage. block, fred. (1977). the origins of international economic disorder. berkeley: university of california press. carr, e.h. (1946). the twenty years crisis. london: macmillan. cox, michael (ed.) (2000). e .h . carr: a critical appraisal. basingstoke: palgrave. ___________. (2001). “whatever happened to american decline? international relations and the new united states hegemony,” new political economy, 6 (3), 311-340. cutler, a. clair. (2000). “theorizing the ‘no-man’s-land’ between politics and economics,” in lawton, rosenau and verdun (2000). economist. london: various dates. germain, randall. (2010). global politics and financial governance. basingstoke: palgrave. gilpin, robert. (1981). war and change in world politics. princeton: princeton university press. | 117 ____________. (1987). the political economy of international relations. princeton: princeton university press. guzzini, stefano. (2000). “strange’s oscillating realism: opposing the idealand the apparent,” in lawton, rosenau and verdun (2000). haldane, andrew and piergiorgio alessandri. (2009). “banking on the state,” bis review, no. 139. accessed at www.bis.org/review/r091111e. pdf on november 17 2009. halliday, fred. (2009). “international relations in a post-hegemonic age,” international affairs, vol. 85, no.1: 37-51. hardt, michael and antonio negri. (2000). empire cambridge: harvard university press. helleiner, eric. (1994). states and the re-emergence of global finance. ithaca: cornell university press. ____________ and jonathan kirshner (eds.). (2009). the future of the dollar. ithaca: cornell university press. ikenberry, john g., michael mastanduno and william c. wohlforth. (2009). “unipolarity, state behaviour and systemic consequences,” world politics, vol. 61, no. 3: 1-27. imf. 2009 world economic outlook, july. washington: international monetary fund. jacques, martin. (2009). when china rules the world: the end of the western world and the birth of a new global order. london: penguin press. keohane, robert o. (1984). after hegemony: cooperation and discord in the world political economy. princeton: princeton university press. keohane, robert o. and joseph s. nye, jr. (1977). power and interdependence: world politics in transition. boston: little, brown. king, michael r. and timothy j. sinclair. (2003). “private actors and public policy: a requiem for the new basle capital accord,” international political science review, vol. 24, no. 3: 345-62. kirshner, jonathan. (1995). currency and coercion: the political economy of international monetary power. princeton: princeton university press. knorr, klaus. (1975). the power of nations: the political economy of international relations. new york: basic books. krasner, stephen (ed.). (1983). international regimes. ithaca: cornell university press. lawton, thomas, james rosenau and amy verdun (eds.). (2000). strange power: shaping the parameters of international relations and international political economy. aldershot: ashgate. may, christopher. (1996). “strange fruit: susan strange’s theory of structural power in the international political economy,” global society, 10 (2), 167-89. nitzan, jonathan and shimshon bichler. (2009). capital as power: a study of order and creorder. london: routledge. power, the state and global politics after the great freeze: towards a new articulation? 118 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times palan, ronen. (1999) “susan strange 1923-1998: a great international relations theorist,” review of international political economy, 6 (2), 121-32. porter, tony. (2005). globalization and finance. cambridge: polity press. russell, ellen d. (2008). new deal banking reform and keynesian welfare state capitalism. london: routledge. schmidt, brian c. (1998). the political discourse of anarchy: a disciplinary history of international relations albany: state university of new york press. ______________. (2005). “competing realist conceptions of power,” millennium, 33 (3), 523-549. scholte, jan aart. (2000). globalization: a critical introduction. basingstoke: macmillan. sinclair, timothy. (2005). the new masters of capital: american bondrating agencies and the politics of creditworthiness. ithaca: cornell university press. strange, susan. (1983). “cave! hic dragones: a critique of regime analysis,” in krasner (1983). ____________. (1986). casino capitalism. oxford: basil blackwell. ____________. (1987). “the persistent myth of lost hegemony,” international organization, vol. 41, no. 4: 551-74. ____________. (1988a). “the future of the american empire,” journal of international affairs, 42 (1), 1-17. ____________. (1988b). states and markets. london: pinter. ____________. (1989). “towards a theory of transnational empire,” in ernst-otto czempiel and james rosenau, eds, global changes and theoretical challenges: approaches to world politics in the 1990s. lexington: lexington books. ____________. (1998). mad money. manchester: manchester university press. thirkwell-white, ben. (2009). “dealing with the banks: populism and the public interest in the global financial architecture,” international affairs, vol. 85, no. 4: 689711. tooze, roger. (2000). “ideology, knowledge and power in international relations and international political economy,” in lawton, rosenau and verdun (2000). underhill, geoffrey r.d. (2000). “state, market and global political economy: genealogy of an (inter-?) discipline,” international affairs, 76 (4), 805-24. ____________________ and xiaoke zhang. (2008). “setting the rules: private power, political underpinnings, and legitimacy in global monetary and financial governance,” international affairs, vol. 84, no. 3: 536-54. | 119 wood, duncan. (2005). governing global banking: the basel committee and the politics of financial globalization. aldershot: ashgate. power, the state and global politics after the great freeze: towards a new articulation? myths on the left: the narrative and discursive practices of the aflcio news francois huot university ofiviassaciiusetts at amiierst the question that presents itself is what, if any, differences are there between the ultimate objectives of organized industry and those of organized labor? suppose we pierce through the flaming slogans, noble writings and dramatic stories and look into the purposes and the philosophy of the organized labor movement in terms ofits contrastto the character oforganized capital . (alinsky, 1969:26) maybe it is because progressive academics can always remember a verse or two from a woody guthrie song or because they cannot make old images of striking wobblies disappear, but the number of studies of the ideological practices ofthe labour movement remains surprisingly low. even if a general mistrust of labor organizations exists in left-wing circles, tradeunions are often constructed as fundamentally 'good' organizations in which little ideological or symbolical manipulation is actually taking place. the defense of the oppressed, the nobleness of purpose and the trade-unions' democratic pretension are seen as saf(^;uards preventing this evoituality (guerard, 1987:1994). i believe, however, that ideological work is taking place 'on the left' and that alinsky's question still needs to be asked. are the american tradealternate routes, volumell, 1994 alternate routes, volume 1 1, 1994 unions really different from organized industry? which forms ofideological and symbolical manipulation are being used mside the labour movement? i mtendto bnnga preliminary answerto these questions by looking at a cultural production ofamerican labour and by conducting an analysis ofthe narrative and the discursive practices of the afl-cio news, 21 biweekly newspaper distnbuted to the unions' officers, employees and subscribing members.^ however, before going any further, it is important to introduce the theoretical perspectives on ideology which allow for the examination of 'left-wing' practices and justify the selection of a labour newspaper as the object of analysis. ideology: from representation to socul practices when rene descartes defined thefundamental dichotomy between the mental process and the natural world (mind and body, subject and object), he also laid the groundwork that allowed for the conceptualization of ideology as a set of ideas or, to borrow from althusser (1971), "representations." in classical marxist thought, which must be situated inside this cartesian paradigm, ideology can only be defined as the imaginary (false) representation of real (extenor) conditions of existence. from this perspective, two basic assumptions emerge: first, the discovery of a true or valid representation is possible and second, ideology cannot exist 'on the left' because what is created there, according to marxist theory, is an exact representation ofone's conditions of existence. in the semiological formulation, on the contrary, meamng never simply reflects the 'real.' meaning is earned by the sign which is created when persons, connect a signifier and a signified (de saussure, 1 959). the creation of meaning appears as an individual process, but this does not imply a guarantee of total freedom: "we are not free to determine these relations [between signifier and signified] as we please: we are a part of a prearranged semiological world" (lewis, 1991:30). as angus and jhally( 1989:2) point out: "people create their own meaning, but as marx noted, 'not in conditions of their own choosing'." huot/myths on the left the mobilization of this prearranged world of signification is the domain of ideological work. thus, as thompson (1984: 13 1) suggests, "[t]o study ideology is to study the ways in which meaning (or signification) serves to sustain relations of domination." this connection ofmeaning to the social order permits the transformation ofthe notion of ideology from a concept of internal ideas, into one of social practices. as althusser notes, "certain notions have purely and simply disappeared from our presentation, whereas others on the contrary survive, and new terms appear...practices, rituals, ideological apparatus" (1971:159). these concepts open the door to the examination of the influence of cultural and ideological practices on the creation of meaning. ideological practices must be connected to discursive and narrative practices and brought into the realm ofthe everyday, for they are a part of "a complex series ofmechanisms whereby meaning is mobilized in the discursive practices of everyday life" (thompson, 1984:63). ideological practices and the trade-unions the production of a labour newspaper, the organization of a strike, the training of newly elected officers, the negotiation encounters, the rallies, the conventions, the meetings and even the informal tete-a-tete around a well deserved drink, all become occasions ofcreation, enactment and reproduction of ideological practices. these practices interact and are mobilized in every phase of union life: the proceedings of a meeting are printed in the union's newspaper, which is studied in a training session and in turn, the knowledge produced there helps to solve an interpersonal problem that occurs in a local committee. through these ideological practices, the leadership ofthe tradeunions will attempt to develop and maintain a hegemonic control of the organization. however, i believe that these ideological practices are better conceptualized as a set ofresources used by relatively autonomous parts (sub-systems) ofthe trade-union than as a set oftruths imposed upon the organization by the leadership. the 'control room' metaphor (collins, 1 989) fails to explain the observed ideological coherence.^ as a resource, ideological practices will be m alternate routes, volume 11, 1994 aiacted by various actors in the everyday life ofan organization. in his work asylum, which decribes the characteristics of total institutions, erving goflfman crafted the notion of institutionalized motives, or frames of referqice, which "may nevertheless function to restrain other types of interpretation" ( 1 96 1 :9 1 ). these frames of reference are ideological practices that will be used to regulate the organizational life. nevertheless, even if such social actors can oijoy a relative autonomy, the battle for the hegemonic control of labour organizations persists. in this struggle, a newspaper like the afl-cio news remains a crucial apparatus that needs to be controlled by the union leadership . in the everyday life ofthe american trade-unions, the afl-cio news provides the assorted stories, narratives and meta-narratives needed to interpret the social world. it presents the main social actors, describes their accomplishments and their predicaments, and constructs a totalizing representation of the world. the texts pnnted in this newspaper reflect the trade-union life and cannot be dissoaated from thepractices ofproduction and decoding (reading). because of this connection between the texts and the organizational practices, an analysis of the afl-cio news will allow for the discovery of the forms of ideological and symbolical manipulation that are taking place inside the organization. each and every story that is printed becomes a battleground in the quest for hegemony. when barthes (1988b) discusses the nature of the text, he opposes the concept of a writerly text with the notion of a readerly one. the reader of a writerly text will be allowed to construct a variety of meanings from this source; the text is characterized by its openness. "we knownow that a text is not a line of words releasing a single 'theological' meaning, but a multi-dimensional space in which a variety ofwritings, none ofthem original, blond and clash" (barthes, 1988b: 146). the cultivation of this hegemonic control is performed through multifarious efforts to close texts, to transform the wnterly into the readerly and to limit the possibilities of meaning creation/^ huot/myths on the left the objective ofthis paper is to examine which stories are told, to find outwho tells us these tales and to uncover which world view is promoted. the analysis will highlight the narrative and discursive elements that support three key ideological practices: practices of transformation, practices of commodification and practices of definition. the afl-cio news performs a transformation of the social actors' nature and characteristics: members who occupy an active social position as workers are transformed into the passive baieficiaries of the union's victories. the battles of the past—^the worker's struggles and victories—are reduced to simple discursive commodities that are mobilized to support labour's image of continuity and radicalness. finally, the newspaper defines, for the purposes of the internal debate, certain key political or organizational concepts: it establishes what are democratic practices, progressive attitudes and important issues. through these practices, ideological structures that contribute to the perpetuation of the existing social and organizational systems are constructed, maintained and reproduced. sources of data and methods for the analysis the afl-cio news was founded in 1 955 at the time ofthe merger between the afl's trade-based unions and the cio's industry based ones,^ most probably out of a necessity to create some sense of organizational cohesiveness in the renewed partnership. the publication evolved, slowly replacing articles constructed around formal statements of the labour's policy with stories more in tune with a modem 'journalistic' style. nowadays, a rapid glance at any issue ofthe afl-cio news evokes images ofthe usa today: colour on the first page, bold graphics, colour photographs and relatively short stories. each story printed in the afl-cio news reproduces the name of the writer and this practice suggests the existence of mainstream media concepts such as the objectivity of the press. the studywas conductedthrough an analysis ofthree issues ofthe aflcio official newspaper: the afl-cio news. these issues were randomly selected over a one year period (1990). each story and photograph was alternate routes, volume 11, 1994 constructed as a basic unit of analysis, using the concq)t oflexia defined by barthes (1974:13): "the best possible space in which we can observe meaning." this method produced 131 different items for the analysis (89 articles, 35 photographs and 7 graphics/tables). the social actors ''qiii est le donateur du recit?"" (barthes, 1971:25). when he asks who gives us the tale, barthes implicitly states the importance ofthe identification ofthe story's narrator. according to the framework developed in l 'analyse stnicturale du recit, the tale can either be narrated by a single individual (the expression of a personal subjectivity), or attributed to a total consciousness (a diffuse and godlike authority). it is also possible for the characters of a story to give an account of their own actions. in the case of the afl-cio news, the second option seems to be the rule: a diffuse authority, the consaence of the union movement, describes a complex world in which r^ vanous protagonists aigage m social actions. the photographic evidence in the modem newspaper, the text is still an essential element, the photograph an optional one. yet photographs, when they appear, add new dimensions of meamng to a text. as roland barthes has observed, "pictures ...are more imperativethan writing, they impose meaningat one stroke, without analyzing or diluting it." (hall, 1972:53) leaders members politicians others total men 46 35 3 4 88 women 1 11 1 3 16 children 2 2 total 47 46 4 9 106 figure 1: the representation of persons according to gender and stated occupation with only one exception' the 35 photographs included in the selected issues of the afl-cio news represent persons taking part in various huot/myths on the left activities. figure 1 identifies the represented persons according to their gender and their stated occupation. the obvious situation revealed bythese numbers is that men outnumber women on a 5:1 ratio. the unions are descnbed as places where men take control ofthe action and occupy the roles of protector ofwomen and owners ofthe public life. this description reinforces the dominant values of struggle, brute force and violence. in union life, women participate in protests or in membership meetings; the union allows some place forwomen but only ifthey assume a pre-defined role as a member. there is no place here for specificity, as the following story demonstrates: "for 114 years, conventions of the marine engineers have been a men only function. . . . the tradition ended this year... two women delegates were present... they received a round of applause from the 46 male delegates" (afl-cio, 1990b:4). even if the presence oftwo womoi is acknowledged the story will quickly reduce them totheirnormal status—simple delegates. in addition to this split alonggender lines, a second division is established between the members and the leaders of the unions: the latter roughly equal the number of the former, but there is only one woman among the 47 leaders depicted. furthermore, the distinction between leadership and membership is deepened, usingthecntena of vanety and senousness ofthe activity. figure 2 describes the activities in which the leaders engage. men who are leaders. . . are taking part in a meeting or in a discussion 17 stand or speak on a podium to a crowd 12 talk to or listen to a politician 9 lead a rally or a protest 3 inspect a factory 2 attend training sessions 2 portrait of. . . 1 figure 2: activities of trade-union leaders. alternate routes, volume 11, 1994 the leaders are active. they take part in meetings and discussions with other union leaders or with important individuals such as technical experts, politiaans, public agenaes managers or company chairpersons. the representation of this activity simultaneously produces an opposition between the nature of the work performed by the officers and ordinary workers, and creates a theatrical opposition/relation between union and society's leaders. the dramatic action will be charactenzed by the exchanges between these important social actors, thus excluding the members from the definition and the resolution oftheir own problems. a second oppositional/relational pair is defined between the leaders and the union's members when the officers are represented standing on a podium, addressing a crowd or leading a rally. each of these performances requires an audience and the members fulfill that function and contribute to the construction of a dynamic relation between the leaders' activity and the members' passivity. on the other hand, the members represented in the photographs of the afl-cio news act as good union members, holding signs, protesting or picketing. figure 3 offers a complete tally ofthe pictured activities. workers are represented almost exclusively as participants in union activities, emphasizing their identity as members. this implied definition relates directlyto the needs of the organization and to those of its leaders. it also excludes from labour's scene the non-unionized workers (unemployed persons, welfare reapients). the political and ideological life of the afl-cio and its social projects refer only to the world of the members. men who are members.. . protest, picket or hold signs 26 talk and chat with other members 3 work at their usual jobs 2 take care of a child while protesting 1 inspect the site of an accident 1 sit on a couch with wife and child 1 portrait of. . . 1 figure 3: activities of trade-union members. huot/myths on the left outside the organization the members simply do not exist as significant social actors in the public sphere, outside the organizational realm. this public world belongs to the unions' leaders. labour's action, an essentially collective process, are individualized and reduced in the afl-cio news' reports to the union leader's activities. leaders are named and their functions and responsibilities are always spelled out. "afl-cio vice-president lenore miller... vicepresident owen bieber of the uaw... charles b. dale president of the newspaper guild... alfred di tolla, president of the stages employees..." (afl-cio, 1990c:8). this techniquetransforms the benefits ofthe collective action into the results of the hard work of certain individuals, a direct connection to the dominant ideological values ofindividuality. the unions are successfiil because they have effective leaders. in addition, the trade-unions are transformed into tools or resources personally owned by the officers. in the following story a reader may believe that the leaders are pledging their own money to support the new york daily news strikers. vice-president morton bahr of the communication workers pledged $50 000, while vice-president john j. sweeny of the service employees and john kelly ofthe office and professional workers each pledged $30 000..." (afl-cio, 1990c:8) in the social world, labour's leaders interact with various politicians who are always referred to as representatives of one political party. in the description of the politicians, there are no surprises: the democrats are the good guys "...an amendment was offered by sen. robert byrd (d-w.va.). supported by the afl-cio, it would have granted supplemental benefits. . . " (afl-cio, 1990b:3) and the republicans the bad ones "...symbolic of the scraps left over for working people under the bush capital gains tax plan" (afl-cio, 1990b:3). the leaders also meet with employers (the real producers of wealth') and appeal to judges (who protect society from the actions of the greedy captains of industry). o alternate routes, volume 11, 1994 a study of the narratives now that the key actors that inhabit the world of the afl-cio news have been identified, an analysis ofthe narrative structures used in the newspaper may reveal how they act and what is the nature of the relations between the protagonists. the organization of the narrative constructs an internal structure into the text and, in so doing, limits the reader's abilityto create meaning. eco ( 1 981) illustrated how such configurations organize the decoding of a specific story. however, the influence of the narratives goes beyond this internal effect: the repetition of specific structures produces an ideological effect by limiting the range of possible decodings oftexts. the interpretation pattern thus created will be transferred and used in the interpretation of a wider range of social events. the study of the labour movement's publications reveals the existence of a central narrative and the presence of a series of secondary narratives used as supporting stones. the main narrative the main narrative is reproduced in a number of stories and it can be used to integrate the remaining articles inside a coherent ideological framework. an effective way to introduce this narrative is to examine a story constructed around it: local 802 also won a first contract for the musicians who perform with the concert pops of long island. those members overwhelmingly ratified a first contract with the new york brass choir inc., the parent group ofthe concert pops. the three year accord provides job secunty for the 39 musicians who were organized in july 1990. complaints of late payment ofwages and of arbitrary dismissals had prompted the organizing dnve. the contract addresses those issues. (afl-cio, 1990c:7) the basic narrative structure displayed here consists of a succession of three different moments: the union won a contract, the members approved it huot/myths on the left and finally, the contract provided benefits to the union's members. two preliminary stages usually appear before this dramaticprogression: the union knows how to act and, using this knowledge, it initiates the action. if these initial phases are included in the basic framework, the completed sequence of action unfolds in the order illustrated in figure 4. the afl-cio news main narrative union knows what to do i , union takes action i union wins agreement i members accept the aggrement i society benefts from union action figure 4: the afl-cio news main narrative structure. the first moment ofthe sequence is characterized by the construction ofthe union as a legitimate organization: the unions know what to do. this legitimation is performed through a series ofstories that promote thepersonal qualities of the union leaders. a recurring column, appearing in every issue oftheafl-cionews, is entitled "newsmakers." inside this feature information regarding the whereabouts of the movement's leaders is published. "robert t. mclntyre, executive vice-president ofthe pennsylvania aflcio. . . recently was presented the first annual williame. cockerill sr. award by the umted way of lackawanna county..." (afl-cio, 1990c:9). in addition, the unionists will appear in photographs that represent them working, often early in the morning, in the company of important public personages. "sen, john glenn (d-ohio) addresses nuclear concerns at a breakfast meeting with conference delegates" (afl-cio, 1990b:4). at a second level a valorization of the technical skills mastered by the union officers is produced when the afl-cio news promotes the organization's o alternate routes, volume 1 1, 1994 training program: " the craft ofnegotiation. negotiation and writing contract language. advanced arbitration and working with the news media..." are several of the showcased skills (afl-cio, 1990c:7). however, this fabncation of the unions' legitimacy depends for the greater part on the appropnation (reinterpretation) of the past and on the continuous demonstration of the justness of the orgamzation's cause. in the first issue of the year the afl-cio news ran a three-page story oititled "amencan labour in the 80's" (afl-cio, 1990a: 1012). this article presctits a senes of cases in which the persistence displayed by the workers lead to important victories. the clothing and textile workers won a contract at j. p. stevois after a 17-year struggle. t&n years after the uaw began an organizing drive, the tenacity of its members finally yielded a contract with ortner freight car co. (afl-cio, 1990a: 10) the survey ofthe previous battles is used to construct the image ofthe 'noble worker.' it associates this image with the american trade-unions and creates a reservoir of tales that will be slowly added to labour's mythology. the article moves forward and gives the reader the official history of the preceding decade. the 1 980 's were marked by another phenomenon: the emergence of the two-tier contract, which permitted lower wage scales for new entrants. . this management demand was less than palatable for workers and their unions. but the double-digit unemployment rate of the reagan recession was taking its toll on workers and their families, and unions reluctantly bowed to this economic necessity. (afl-cio, 1990a: 11) ttiis reinterpretation ofthe past will be etched in stone and will become as definitive, within the movement, as is the story of the great depression. union members or officers who opposed this political line ofconcessions will not be able to refer back to their own interpretation of what is now labelled as the 'reagan recession.''' the bottom line is that the labour movemait huot/myths on the left survived the reagan years and business can go on as usual. "a union card remains the worker's best friend" (afl-cio, 1990a: 12). this commodification ofthe workers' past struggles through ideological practices does not stop there as selected worker's biographies are used to intimate the union's actions. a series of articles on the issue ofoccupational health and safety accomplishes this task bypresenting several cases ofinjured workers. "harold gallegos, a soft-spoken man, has endured two years of untold pain and suffering since being contaminated by a chemical soup mixture..." (afl-cio, 1990b:7). this is the classical appeal to a higher moral ground: ifthe unions are fightingto protect the sick and even to prevent death, how can one oppose its actions? the second stage of the narrative sequence occurs when the union initiates action. this narrative moment reifies the union itself and presoits it as the real initiator ofvarious actions. as a consequence, workers and umon members are excluded from the key moments of collective action, the elaboration ofthe strategy and the deci sion to act. ifthe union can be identified as the source ofthe action, the future benefits will be attributed to the union, thus justifying its existence. this process is used in the body ofthe various stories. "the arkansas afl-cio joined in a complaint to the federal communication commission claiming that a major television station slanted its coverage on a state ballot question" {afl-cio news, 1990c:5). but most often it operates in the headlines' text. "unions seek right to act to save workers lives" (afl-cio, 1990c:2). the other technique used to produce this effect is to credit the union's leader with the initiation of the action. a typical illustration of this method can be found in the caption of one photograph: "union presidents vincent sombrotto, left, and moe biller rally members of the letter carriers and postal workers outside the usps headquarters" (afl-cio, 1990c:6). the members disappear from the scene as the union leads the way: "afl-cio vice-president lenore miller of the retail, wholesale and department stores umon, said rwdsu pledged $75 000, with $55 000 coming from its local 1 199." (afl-cio, 1990c:8) the alternate routes, volume 11, 1994 fact that real members contnbuted their own money in solidarity for thenew york daily news strikers becomes irrelevant. the natural consequence of any action on the part of the union is that the union wins an agreement, this constitutes the third stage ofthe narrative. the union gains new benefits for its members, "food and commercial workers (ufcw) at three arizona supermarket chains won wage increases andlump-sum payments under anewfive-year contract" (afl-cio, 1990a:2); signs agreements with employers, ". . the uaw has won agreements that the companies will join in the effort for a national solution to the u. s . health care problem" (afl-cio, 1 990c: 1 ) or wins court battles, "actwu legal action wins retiree center for 20 000" (afl-cio, 1990b: 13). once again, the contribution made from the workers becomes an element ofthe background. sometimes the workers have to strike: "a week long stnke by 1 1 000 members of the services employees local 399..." (afl-cio, 1990b: 15). however, even ifthis action was staged by the union's members, the headline of this article reads: "seiu local wins contract at hmo." the reified union becomes the true social actor. the fourth stage ofthe narrative begins when the members accept the agreement which the union obtained for them. the role reserved for the members is quite limited, essentially they will have the opportunity to cast a ballot to approve the results ofthe bargaining between the union ' s rep resentatives and the employer. "lam members at mcdonnell douglas aircraft co. ratified a three-year agreement that provides a 1 1.5% wage increase plus lump-sum bonuses over the contract term" (afl-cio, 1990a:2). in this article, the percentages of the approval vote are emphasized. this provides a clear indication of the democratic structure of the union and, especially when the result of the ratification vote is overwhelming, gives an indication of the approval rating of the union performance. to give an impression of being a democratic organization seems to be important. another story explains that a union organized a ratification vote through a mail-in ballot. what can be more democratic than a vote in which every member had the opportunity to express his/her opinion in the pnvacy ofhis/her own home? no huot/myths on the left membership meetings where anti-democratic practices may take place, no debate and no pressure. the kind ofdemocracy promoted by the trade-unions bears a striking resemblance to the mainstream american practice of voting once every four years without taking part in any kind of public debate. the last part of the central narrative describes how the workers and society in general benefit from the trade-union's actions. the workers' gains are presented in every article reporting on the settlement ofa negotiation. the descriptions ofthe benefits are usually very detailed so that everyone can have a precise idea ofthe gains reaped by the union. moreover, the effects of the union's action reach not onlytheworkers but also members ofsociety at large. in a report ofa conference on nuclear safety this is stated in a straightforward manner: "concerned activity by the various unions have helped reduce risks in recent years, but the greed ofprivate contractors and the lax administration ofthe doe has added to those risks" (afl-cio, 1990a:4). but sometimes the connections are far more subtle. one article runs under the following headline: "umawwins right to work navajo repeal" (afl-cio, 1990c:5). the story explains how the navajo tribal council, under pressure from the united mine workers of america, removed a right to work disposition in favour ofthe navajo workers from the local l^slation. the result ofthe vote was 34-33. "[s]aid eugene badonie, president ofumwa local 1924. 'from now on, the navajo people will have good labour laws'" (afl-cio, i990c:5). one man's notion ofprogress is another man's notion ofgenocide. the power of the main narrative the basic form ofthis main narrative is so predominant in the articles ofthe afl-cio news that it will be used to report the 'not so successful ' contract negotiations. "the united transportation urnon reached agreement with the csx corp. railroad subsidiary to reduce crew sizes. about 375 workers will be affected bythe change. . . . another 1 75 furloughed brakemen will not return to their jobs under the accord. they may have either a $5000 separation allowance or the relocation money ($20 000 if jobs are available)" (aflcio, 1990a:4). in this story, the main narrative sequoice is used and its alternate routes, volume 11, 1994 ideological dominance allows for the presentation of this defeat (375 eliminatedjobs) as an ordinary bargaining report. the employer bargained in good faith and reached an agreement, the union did its job and the employees will be awarded a separation allowance. a defeat becomes a victory. the narrative structure clearly limits the possibility to look for global explanations outside the typical pattern. if it cannot be explained, then it becomes an act of god. the narratives for action in the second stage of the main narrative the unions organize and engage in various social actions. the examination ofthe different conceptions of social action displayed in the afl-cio news reveals a strong preference for legal action, political action and collective bargaining. figure 5 shows the articulation of these different modes of action. negotiation with a 'good' capitalist union wins an agreement union takes action negotiation with a 'bad' capitalist union organizes a strike legal action lobbying society benefits from union action figure 5: the narratives for union action initiating legal action is one of the preferred tactical avenues used by amencan trade-unions. a labour organization instigates l^al action to gain huot/myths on the left gaieral benefits for its members or to solve a complex bargaining process. legal action is important for the labour movemait mostly because its conception ofthe interrelations between the social system and the legal world is similar to the point ofview usually promoted in the american society. the possibilities for individual and collective action are embodied in 'rights' which are created by laws. "that includes the right to refuse life-threataiing work without suffering recrimination for the employer, and the right for the workers' representative to participate fully..." (afl-cio, 1990c:2). in consequence, pressing to get new legislation passed is constructed as an important activity because this action results in further protection for members and society. "the communication workers urgedthe swift passage of legislation to curb workplace violations of privacy by employers and to protect the rights ofworkers and consumers" (afl-cio, 1 990c: 11). getting new l^slation is the way to reform society and to use such tactics demonstrates complete agreement of the labour movemait with the actual 'rules of the game.' "orgamzed labour is completely committed to gettmg reform l^slation introduced in the next congress and 'we will do everything we can do to get it passed' donahue said" (afl-cio, 1990c:2). whenthelaw is constructed as the prime ruling force of society and when the u.s. constitution provides 'justice for all,' appealing to the courts to obtain justice becomes the legitimateway to act. "a union and human rights alliance is suing the bush administration..." (afl-cio, 1990b:4) or "the lawsuit was brought by civil service employees association local 830, on behalf of 7000 public workers" (afl-cio, 1990a:3). even if the courts are portrayed as neutral bodies, the union prefers to keep a firm control over their actions. "biller said that the unions still would like to settle negotiation without proceedingto arbitration, 'where anything can happen'" (afl-cio, 1990c:l). in this context, the activity of lobbying becomes an appealing way to press for new legislative protection. union leaders perform this mission whai they schedule meetings with state or federal politicians. " georgia building trades delegation calls on rep. bai jones (d-ga.) dunng the bctd alternate routes, volume 1 1,1 994 legislative conferoice in washington" (afl-cio, 1990 b:3). the promotion of members' interests is also acxx)mplished through public lobbying, when unions stage press conferences in which the leaders present their policy proposals on vanous topics. "in a white paper titled 'legacy of neglect: amenca's decaying roads and bndges' iron workers' president jake west warns that the decaying road system also would undercut productivity, jobs and even global competitiveness" (afl-cio, 1 990c:3). yet, a more effective way to exert influence is for the union officers to become accepted members ofthe 'old boys network.' the afl-cio's officers excel in this trade. "cochairs of the event included afl-cio secretary-treasurer thomas r. donahue, general motors corp. chairman robert stempel and richard j. schmeelk, chairman of c.a.i. advisors" (afl-cio, 1990c:7). nevertheless, even if l^al action and lobbying remain important activities, the negotiation of collective agreements remains the afl-cio raison d'etre. "through contract negotiation where possible and through legislative action when necessary, labour will ..." (afl-cio, 1 990a: 12). the examination of contract bargaining stories reveals the basic ideological assumptions of american labour and a fundamental community of interest existing between the employers and the unions. "in every sector of our society, there is a growing commitment to consider a new national approach..." (afl-cio, 1990c: 1). this is not only expliatly stated in the articles but also suggested by the kind of treatment reserved for the good capitalist, the employer who chooses to play within the good faith bargaimng scenano proposed by the unions. these rational employers are praised for their actions: "exel, a subsidiary of cargill inc., undertook the agreement out of enlightened management philosophy that a company that is not part ofthe solution is part ofthe problem" (afl-cio, 1990a:3). the ideal narrative for the bargaimng stories is built around the idea that a senous and intensive bargaining taking place between a union and an enlightened employer will yield an agreement both parties will find beneficial. a small dose ofcommon sense then proves that the economic system works for everyone. "[r]apid conclusion ofour negotiations was possible only because both parties entered huot/myths on the left the process with a firm commitment to move forward and to avoid the kind ofadversarial labour relations we had seen at eastern" (afl-cio, 1 990a: 2). ultimately, this construction goes beyond the bargaining process itself and becomes the metaphor upon which society should be organized: a negotiation of interests and advantages in which each party enters in good faith is seen as the only civilized way to work in a capitalist society. if everyone agrees to abide by this general rule, no one should lose and the emergence of conflict becomes rare, if not impossible. however, a small number of employers, because of bad faith or mere ineptitude, reject the model proposed bythe labour movement. ifthe employer displays an improper behaviour, theafl-cionews will compare its actions to those ofmore responsible managers. "theatrical stage employees local 1 voted strike authorization against cbs inc., after successfully bargaining new agreements with rival networksnbc and abc" (afl-cio, 1 990b: 1 5). the workers had to give the union a strike authorization, but this kind of action is always the consequence ofthe employers' position in the bargaining process. "the news management made a cold, deliberate decision to work against unions and their employees..." (afl-cio, 1990c:l). if, later in the process, the employees have to walk out, it will be in response to the employer's bad faith: either management delayed too long to initiate the bargainingprocess or demanded unreasonable concessions fromthe workers. "the 1700 miners walked offthejob after 17 months of stalled negotiations. pittston was seeking to eliminate or sharply cut health benefits. . . " (afl-cio, 1 990a:2). at this point, it is important to stress that the afl-cio will never describe an ongoing strike as a success, the decision to initiate this pressure tactic is always a result of the employer's action and a major failure of the bargainingprocess. onlywhen the strike is over will its memories and images be transformed and become part of the union's mythology. the union continually works for a quick termination of the strike and tries to convince the employer of the losses caused by this ordeal. "but the company's own financial reports...show that an end to the strike would be in the interests of all parties: workers, creditors and management" (afl-cio, 1990b:2). the alternate routes, volume 1 1, 1994 aid ofa labour dispute is always presented as the end ofa nightmare, and both labour and management wish for a different scenano when thetimeto bargain a new contract arrives. "pittston chairman paul w. douglas saluted the miners and their families. . . he expressed hope that labour and management could develop a long term solution..." (afl-cio, 1990a:2). the mythical discourses the utilization ofmyth can be related to a series of discursive practices that support the narratives and strengthen the worldview presented in the aflcio news. however, the existence and the effects ofmyth remain subtle and difficult to detect and this is why its investigation bears such a weight in the discovery of ideological practices. according to barthes (1988a), myth naturalizes the association of determinate meanings with specific signifiers and performs this association in an ambiguous manner: it can be donethrough a simplejuxtaposition oftwo different sets of signifiers or through displacement (or substitution) of usual meaningful associations. the impact of the myth is instantaneous in nature: "...myth essentially aims at causing an immediate impression—it does not matter if one is later allowed to see through the myth, its action is assumed to be stronger than the rational explanations which may later belie it... that is all and that is enough" (barthes, 1988a: 130). because of its naturalness, the ideological effects of the myth will survive its unravelling. "a more attentive reading of the myth will in no way increase its power or its ineffectiveness: a myth is at the same time imperfectible and unquestionable; time or knowledge will not make it better or worse" (barthes, 1988a: 130). a demonstration of a mythical creation of meaning by a juxtaposition of signifiers can be found in the article entitled "unions seek right to act to save workers' lives" (afl-cio, 1990c:2). the first step used here descnbes the safety conditions existing in the american factones as similar to those of wartime conditions: "...the war in the american workplace daily claims victims. workers pay the toll, employers pocket the profits and 20 years of attempts by the osha to diminish the sacrifice have failed" (aflhuot/myths on the left cio, 1990c:2). the juxtaposition is completed, a paragraph later, recalling the vietnam war: "for 1 6 years the bloodshed in vietnam appeared in nightly newscasts and the tally is inscribed on a memorial black granite walls—58 175 names..." (afl-cio, 1990c:2). this association yields a predominant meaning: the killing that takes place in the workplace produces real deaths, as serious as the ones occurring in combat. still, it goes beyond the obvious; comparison between the workers and the soldiers, between the trade-unions and the nation, between the employers and the enemy, and finally, an association between the workers' struggle and the plight of the american soldiers forced to fight with 'a hand tied behind their back' are created. in some cases, the discursive strat^es become more subtle and involve a succession of associations and substitutions that foster the desired effect. several days before thanksgiving, this complex technique is displayed in a feature headlined "children are the victims of foreign toymakers" (aflcio, 1990c:3). the title of the article builds on an ambiguity; at the first glance it can be deciphered as 'american kids arethe victims oiunsafe foreign made toys' during the christmas season, every parent or adult wishes to protect the safety of his/her children, nephews and nieces. this headline creates an enigma and the reader seeks to know which toys to avoid in order to fiilfill his/her mission and bring joy and pleasure to american childr^i. readingthe article resolves this aiigma by creating an additional mystery, the story describes the conditions of exploitation of child labour in overseas factories located in asia. "the young workers slept in dormitories, two or three to a bed, and earned $10 to $3 1 a month. twice a month, children as young as 10wereforcedtowork24-hours shifts" (afl-cio, 1990c:3). five countries are named in the first two paragraphs of the story: taiwan, hong kong, the philippines, thailand and china, but in the rest ofthe article, only china is mentioned. this feature is constructed on three main arguments: first, capitalists who exploit childroi are 'evil ' capitalists and must not be encouraged, second these exploiters are foreign nationals or evai communists (the multiple references to china), and finally, to stay on the safe side, all foreign-madetoys alternate routes, volume 1 1, 1994 should be avoided. the myth is created when the american trade-unions cast themselves in the role ofthe defender ofchildren and implore the reader tojoin them in the boycott offoreign made toys. this illusion is completed by a side story entitled "buy these toys," in which the american corporations are named and a list ofthe appropriate and safe products is displayed. now, the consumer knows how to act and can alleviate his/her guilt by enacting a dominant bourgeois myth, the ideal of a good consumer. not only does this story negate the fact that exploitation and domination thrive in amencan factories and conceal the connection between overseas sub-contractors and u.s. companies, but it also contributes to the support ofone ofthe /ifl-c/o news ' main narratives: that the trade-unions are the best defense against exploitation in general. the techniques of myth in the last pages of mythologies, barthes describes a group of rhetorical practices (that he situates 'on the right') used in everyday discourse in the creation of myths: inoculation, the privation of history, identification, neither-norism, the quantification of quality, tautology and the statement of fact are some of these discursive figures. examples of several of these rhetorical techniques can be found in the afl-cio news. for the purposes ofthis article only inoculation, identification, and the quantification ofquality shall be discussed. inoculation works by admitting into the narratives a small quantity of opposing stories, tying in with notions of freedom of speech, plurality and democracy. this nominal dose of evil awakens the ideological immune system and in so doing supports a gaieral claim that the system as a whole functions well. more oftai than not, theafl-cio news uses this method by opposing a small number of 'bad' capitalists to a group of employers who accqdt the rules of the game and bargain with the trade unions. the construction of eastern airiines as such an antagonistic employer starts in january (afl-cio, 1990a:2), continues in apnl (afl-cio, 1990b: 1) and is still going on at the end of november (afl-cio, 1990c:2); a surpnsing huot/myths on the left continuity ifthe randomness ofthe selection ofthe material for the analysis is taken into account. naming the individuals involved contributes to the attribution of the responsibility for the system's mishaps to individual behaviour. the trustee (martin shugrue) is presented as a misbehaving administratorwho is overoptimistic, who lies and refuses totalktothe unions. "[a] trustee be appointed to replace former eastern boss frank lorenzo.... instead ofbargaining with the iam, shugrue conducted a 'smoke and mirror' campaign to rebuild ndership..." (afl-cio, 1990c:2). the reader is asked to remember the irrational actions of frank lorenzo, those that led to the demise ofeastern airlines: "...the latest chapter in the downward spiral ofan airlinethat oncewas a major force inthe industry" (afl-cio, 1 990c:2). this presentation of 'evil' capitalists ultimately reinforces the belief that the system can work well if everyone contributes; the whole society benefited from the existence of eastern airlines and now, it no longer exists. identification relates to the representation ofthe other; its conventions enablethe readerto deal with the question ofdifference and similaritybetween individuals or groups and, in so doing, to construct a sense of identity. depending on what the preferred effect is, the manipulation of identity that takes place in the afl-cio news revolves around the opposition between being an american and being a worker. to a union member, being a worker is important when he/she is confronted with other workers having different identities or a different set ofsocial problems, and thecommon bond oflabour will be stressed by a number of articles. union leaders from different countries are presented in the pages of the paper: a bulgarian leader meets with the amencan labour president (afl-cio, 1990b: 13), a polish sohdarity member expresses support for u.s. miners (afl-cio, 1990b: 15), salvadorian unionists are portrayed as participants in a peace conferoice (afl-cio, 1990b:6) and the plight of cuban workers will be the angle used to discuss the social and economic situation in that country (afl-cio, 1990c:4). however, stressing the similarities between workers of diflferait nations is always balanced by an appeal to american values or interests. an interesting angle on this can be found in an article oititled "union, right alternate routes, volume 11, 1994 group sue bush over trade preference." (afl-cio, 1990b:4). in this, the afl-cio appears to be preoccupied with the human rights violations that happen in foreign countries and where employers " . . take advantage ofcheap, exploited labour" (afl-cio, 1990b:4). in fact, this article develops side by side narratives: the first one tells the members that american jobs can be protected by revertingto protectionist measures and the second storypretaids that something is done to promote the cause of human rights in foreign countries. in this case, the labour movemait is not asking the administration to put pressure on the nations v^th bad records but rather to cut trade, thus removing unfair competition for afl-cio's members. suddoily, the foreigners are not workers any more and the good foreigners are the ones who imitate american values. "geraldo aroyo, president ofthe afscme local 3345, delivered a remarkable soliloquy that ranged from his six-mile swim to freedom 25 years ago to his vietnam war service, to his fight for justice for thegroundskeepers at florida international university" (afl-cio, 1 990c:4). for the american trade-unions, international solidarity still translates in the export ofthe u. s . model ofunions : free unions, capitalism and democracy are included in the same package. the quantification ofquality is an operation that reduces an aesthetic or a political quality to mere numbers. "by reducing any quality to quantity, myth economizes intelligence" (barthes, 1988a: 153). the afl-cio news returns to this practice whai dealing with the concepts of rq)resctitativaiess and democracy. a trade-union is representative and efficient whoi it rqjresents an important number of persons and many stories will leave no doubt of the importance of afl-cio's unions in the mind of the reader: "the apwu andnalc representing 568 000 employees formed thejoint bargaining committee..." (afl-cio, 1990c:l) or "...is a 22 minutes documentary video tape describing rwdsu local 1 199's recent contract victory for 50 000 health care workers..." (afl-cio, 1990c:7). the sheer force of numbers can also be expressed in actions of solidarity: "a coordinated campaign by 8000 steelworkers at 23 plants in the u s . and canada. . . " (aflcio, 1 990b:4). this method also serves to establish the democratic character of the unions: the number of actual voters or percentages are disclosed in huot/myths on the left numerous stories and are used to qualify the approval vote on a contract agreement. "steelworkers at 13 ltv steel plants overwhelmingly ratified a new agreement. . .uswa members approved the settlement by a 1 0261131 margin" (afl-cio, 1990b:2). on these grounds, it becomes impossible to use a different criteria to judge the quality of the agreement; one just has to look at the numbers. the fact that the union was unable to organize a strike, that the pattern of negotiation was set in a similar factory or that the bargaining committee sold out, are transformed into useless arguments. in a way, this line taps in the argument developed by the rock the vote media blitz:^ ifyou do not vote, you cannot criticize the results ofthe election or the actions of the elected officials. the world according to the afl-cio this description ofthe social actors, narrative structures and myths created in the afl-cio news can be summarized along two axes of opposition presented in figure 6. ulion leaders £xpo5c brok«ik bad eaitk scpu'blicanf prot«c< i«moent5 a^r««mcnt5 ixploftalioil "^^ lossts court* arlitration i>eir±e>l-*e:irelx±jza.-fc.±c3« of the centre: w(h)ither canada? dave broad this paper offers a conceptualization of canada 's social, economic and political (toes in terns of a peripheralization of the centre or, core colloquially, latinamericanization of canada. drawing on literature which deals with the "new international division of labour", the author argues that current problems of so-called deindustrialization , high unemployment , state and corporate attacks on trade unions and cuts in welfare-state funding may not simply be symptoms of economic crisis in general, but phenomena related to a much larger process of global industrial restructuring. this restructuring could drastically alter the capital/wage-labour relation, processes of production and the role of the state in the reproduction of canada s social relations. there are foreboding signs that this transformation is one which will bring canadian society closer to the third morld norm. but there are also signs that the process of peripheralization is breeding resistance. introduct ion the purpose of this essay is to ascertain how world systems analysis might help us to understand current social changes in canadian society. and i must state from the outset that this essay is more a theoretical elaboration and illustration than an empirical demonstration. there are two sets of literature in world systems scholarship which are germane to this enterprise. the first is that literature which deals with the "restructuring" of the international division of labour (jonas and dixon, 1980), or the tendency toward a "new international division of labour" ( frobel et al . 1980). the second is that which deals with the "peripheral ization of the centre" (dixon et al . , 1983), or what barnet and muller (1974) have discussed as the "latinamericanization of the united states." 1 in what follows i wish to explore the fruitfulness of suggesting that, given the context of a restructuring of the international division of labour (idl) toward a globalization of production, there is the tendency toward a peripheralization of canadian society -such that canadian society is coming to look more like what we expect to find in the so-called third world. this essay was presented to the annual meeting of the canadian sociology and anthropology association, mcmaster university, hamilton, ontario, june 2-5, 1987. the author wishes to thank lori foster, dennis olsen and two anonymous reviewers for their comments on an earlier draft while remaining culpable for the final product. this implies contextual izing high unemployment, state and corporate attacks on trade unions, cuts in welfare state funding, and so forth not simply as symptoms of depression or economic decline, but as phenomena related to a much larger process of global industrial restructuring which is drastically altering the relation between capital and wage labour, the process of production and the role of the state in the reproduction of canadian social relations. foreboding signs can be found in the present tory free-trade initiative, the privatization binge, the review of unemployment insurance benefits, the growth of food banks, and rumblings about a larger "security" role for the canadian state. but there are also signs that the process of peripheral izat ion is breeding resistance through; canadianization of the united auto workers and labour struggles against all that the free-trade initiative implies; through church struggles against increasing immiseration of the population; through aboriginal people's struggles against intensified exploitation of their resource heritage, et cetera. the world system there are liberal and marxist variants of world systems analysis. for both, nation-states are conceived to be part of an international division of labour and are ranked hierarchically according to their mode of insertion into the world economy. host developed are centre, or core states, followed by semiperipheries and peripheries. 2 interstate relations are typified 3 by domination and exploitation. historically, centre states have benefited from their exploitation of periphery and semi-periphery economies. various forms of imperialist exploitation have distorted the development of non-centre state productive forces, leaving them dependent on export to the world market. international divisions of labour (idl) have changed since the inception of the so-called european world economy 3 , with changes in power relations between states and with the development of world capitalism. but the idl has continued to be characterized by the centre-periphery axis. for marxist world systems analysts, these nation-state relations are based on and crosscut by class relations and exploitation. with the advancing transnationalizat ion of the capitalist production process there is some indication that centre-periphery relations of exploitation are changing. the freedom with which transnational corporations can move many factors of production over the globe is making state boundaries less significant. if production conditions are more profitable in one area than another, the transnat ionals can pick up and move. labour unions in the centre perceive this as a direct threat to wage levels and job security. this threat is compounded by the fact that production processes are being both deskilled and parcelled over the globe. thus labour's still localized struggles are weakened. current high rates of unemployment and lower skill requirements make recalcitrant workers relatively easy to replace. and globally-parcelled and internationally-duplicated production make local and national walkouts less of a threat to transnational capital . according to dixon et al (1983:190) these changes, "at the theoretical level, point toward a redefinition of the concepts of core, periphery, and semi-periphery." they suggest that, because of deskilling and transnat ional izat ion of the production process, working and living conditions in the centre of the world system are coming to replicate those of the periphery. discussing the u.s. case, dixon et al . (1983:176) state that: in their effort to become more competitive, u.s. capitalists have sought ever cheaper. ever more productive (but deskilled and degraded), ever more vulnerable sources of labour. for the u.s. working class this results in ever-increasing unemployment among unionized blue-collar workers. further irowth of the permanently unemployed underclass, and an increasing demand for the low-paid, unskilled labour of superexploited 4 , undocumented immigrants (cf. barnet and muller, 1974). for the canadian case, holmes and leys (1987:9) argue "that a shift is occurring from highly paid, full-time, male employment in manufacturing to lower paid, part-time. female, and youth employment in the service sector." this is all part of the process i am calling the "peripheral ization of the centre" -the transformation of high-wage liberal-democratic societies, into low-wage authoritarian societies. though canada may not share all the features of per ipheral ization which dixon et al . attribute to the u.s., i think that their conceptualization of this process of social transformation can be fruitfully applied to canada. i will begin with a discussion of changes in the international division of labour and the contemporary crisis of global capital accumulation. this will be followed by a look at canada's role and place in the world economy, and a discussion of tendenciessocial, economic and political -at work in canadian society which support the peripheral ization thesis. i will conclude by pointing to countertendencies which might mitigate the deleterious effects of the per ipheral i zat ion process on working and middle-class sectors, and by discussing current labour and social struggles against increasing austerity and authoritarianism. restructuring the international division of labour the modern world system is the product of the transition from feudalism to capitalism in western europe and the birth of the european world economy at the end of the fifteenth century. until the 1960 's the world economy has witnessed three phases of what frobel et al (1980:11) refer to as the "classical" international division of labour. these phases have been characterized by the creation of centres and peripheries "both intraand international ly ... with different forms of control over labour for different types of production in different regions of the capitalist world economy" (frobel et al . . 1980 : 32 ) . what has typified the classical idl is that the centre countries have developed through production of manufacturing exports by highwage labour, while the periphery has been relegated to the production of agricultural and resource exports by superexploi ted labour . the three phases of the classical idl correspond roughly to the three phases of the capitalist world system: 1) merchant capitalism -1500-1780; 2) industrial capitalism -1780-1880; and 3) monopoly capitalism -1880-present . the growth of the transnational corporation and advances in technology under the monopoly phase lay the basis for a new international division of labour (nidl) which began to gel in the 1960's. according to frobel et al . (1980:45), this nidl is the result of the transnationalization of the capitalist production process: we use the term 'the new international division of labour' to designate that tendency which: a) undermines the traditional bisection of the world into a few industrialized countries on one hand, and a great majority of developing countries integrated into the world economy solely as raw material producers on the other; and b) compels the increasing subdivision of manufacturing processes into a number of partial operations at different industrial sites throughout the world, where the division of labour should be understood as an ongoing process, and not as a final result. how did it come about that this nidl was possible? frobel et al . suggest three conditions which were necessary for the restructuring of the idl: a) "the development of a worldwide reservoir of potential labour power" (1980:34). this condition resulted from social and technological transformations in the third world which are closely related to the second condition: b) "the development and refinement of technology and job organization makes it possible to decompose complex production processes into elementary units such that even unskilled labour can be easily trained in quite a short period of time to carry out the rudimentary operations" (1980:35). this process of deskilling, which braverman (1974) refers to as "the degradation of work," allows capital to use the cheapest, most docile, labour available -often female labour. the third condition necessary for a nidl allows capital to wander the globe in search of that low-wage labour: c) "the development of a technology which renders industrial location and the management of production itself largely independent of geographical distances" (1980:36). vuskovic (1980:10) summarizes the impact of these changes: in at least three areas, technological developments now exist that were not available earlier. first, even in relatively more complex activities there is a growing technical ability to "break-up" the productive process, separating out "segments" which require a higher input of skilled labour from those which, though highly capitalintensive, can be undertaken by unskilled or semiskilled workers. second, a more efficient transportation system ( containerizat ion , air freight, etc.) permits the geographical dispersion of those segments without prohibitive cost increases. and third, advances in communication, information and control techniques allow for centralized direction and administration of industrial complexes despite dispersed plant locations. these changes have resulted in what frobel et al . term "world market oriented industrialization" and the world market factory." production in world market factories is highly vertically integrated into the transnational operations of the individual companies and involves non-complex production operations; as regards the processing of each product or product group, the production process is largely confined to part operations: the manufacturing of parts, assembling of parts, or final assembly (1980:22). transnational capital has begun to spread its operations over the globe not only in search of cheap labour, but also to avoid militant labour struggles, environmental protection laws, 8 taxes, et cetera. operations are being set up wherever costs for each aspect of production are lowest. not only is there a division of labour in production -that division of labour itself is global. the beauty of this for capital is that it is now often possible to escape labour demands by running away ( thus the "runaway shop") or by threatening labour with that possibility (cf. barnet and muller , 1974 : 303f f , on "the obsolescence of american labour"). frobel et al . use the case of german transnational textile capital to illustrate these trends. but others have noted the same trends in transnational automobile production. monopoly capital has been attracted to third world countries where wages are 10-20x of those in the centre, where the working day (week or year) is longer, and where productivities are now comparable to those in the centre. this means that labourers worldwide can now more easily be discarded and replaced, and that capital can pick and choose its labour force (increasingly young, third world women ) . consequently, there has been a proliferation of so-called "free production zones" 5 in the third world. periphery states have been vying with one another to offer capital premium conditions for accumulation. frobel et al . (1980;22) tell us that since the mid-1960's literally thousands of world market factories have set up shop in the third world. and far from improving the lot of third world workers and peasants as some writers have projected, transnational industrialization has worsened living and working conditions in the periphery (cf. amin, 1984). so far the trade unions have more or less succeeded in preventing the large-scale penetration of these adverse conditions into the 'centre.' however, the competition on the world labour market, and the large amount of structural unemployment in the traditional industrialized capitalist countries which results from it, are increasingly undermining this not inconsiderable achievement... workers in the already industrialized countries are now placed on a worldwide labour market and forced to compete for their jobs with their fellow workers in the developing countries. today, with the development of a worldwide market in production sites, the traditional industrialized and the developing countries have to compete against one another to attract industry to their sites (frobel et aju.1980:35,13). while some (e.g. petras, 1981) dismiss the notion of a nidl, the theme has gained popularity in development literature, including canadian literature, as we shall see. and it forms the basis for dixon et al . ' s (1983) study of the peripheralization of the u.s. centre (cf. jonas and dixon, 1980). dixon et al^. note three tendencies which are beginning to affect american society: 1) the relocation of industries to the third world (runaway shops); 2) increasing employment of migrant labour -meaning low-wage, unskilled, third world labour -and the creation of a transnational labour force; and 3) the re-industrialization of the united states. the first of these tendencies has been outlined above. given the united states' common border with mexico and close proximity to the caribbean, the use of migrant (often illegal) labour by u.s. capital has been easy to facilitate. since wwii the use of migrant labour has increased not only in the u.s., but 10 in other centre nations -for example, west germany's importation of "guest workers" from the middle east and africa ( frobel et al . . 1980). the incidence of immigrant labour in canada has been a consistent feature -especially, in recent years, in less capital-intensive manufacturing sectors such as textiles where third world women are often used. however, the employment of migrant labour is not as extensive as in the u.s. capital's need to re-industrialize in the centre is a subject that is receiving increasing attention in the u.s. and canada. re-industr lal izat ion is seen to be more of a burning issue in the u.s. and canada than in, for example, germany and japan. this is so because the latter countries have experienced a re-industrialization in the post-wwii period which makes their industry more competitive on the world market. dixon et al . (1983:184-5) suggest that there are three routes for industrial restructuring: the first option, at least theoretically, would be to modernize and upgrade the technology of existing plants in major heavy industries such as auto and steel, in part through government subsidies... the second route is through investment in the "high-tech" world of microchips, computers. and robotics (silicon valley), using the research and development programs created and subsidized by defense and space-related government investment. high technology industries are fundamentally capital intensive... but there is a third option or route. an alternative for those u.s. industries that must remain labour intensive and cannot be automated ... this is the route of investment reviving primitive forms of superexploi tat ion : garment industry sweatshops, putting-out svstems. and the like. so-called "urban enterprise zones" -the counterpart to 11 third world free production zones -are the main setting for the third option. in these zones. and throuffhout the restructured industries, low-wage and semior unskilled labour will become the norm. high technology production dortenrfs the necessity of only a few highly-skilled positions. von werholf (1984) makes the point that low-skilled (in capital's terms), low-wage labour is not becoming the norm, but has been the norm throughout the history of the capitalist world system. this fact has simply been obscured by eurocentrist notions that capitalism is not a world svstem. von werholf (1984:135) notes: "eighty to ninety percent of the world population consists of women, peasants, craftsmen, pettv traders, and wage labourers whom one cannot call 'free' or 'proletarian.'" she goes on to say: the solution of the puzzle is verv simple: everything is just the opposite of what it appears to be. not the 10x free wage labourers but the 90% unfree non-wage labourers are the pillar of accumulation and growth, the truly exploited, the real 'producers.' the 'norm,' and represent the general condition in which human beings find themselves under capitalism. and now this is also threatening the proletariat to their great horror (1984:138). von werholf contends that the "pillar" of accumulation and the "vision of the future" are the third world and the housewife, and that labour is becoming "femalized." her "thesis is that the principles of organization of housework will determine our future and not, as assured until now, the principles of organization of proletarian wage labour" (1984:158). this is a provocative, though not surprising, contention. and it dovetails nicely with dixon et al . ' s (1983:189-90) thesis that 12 we are seeing a process of semi-per lpheral izat ion of certain sectors of the i' . s . labour force, and the importation of the periphery and the semi-per lphery into the heart of the united state -tnat is, the increasing imposition of forms of exploitation on sectors of the u.s. working class that have previously been imposed primarily on third world populations and, within the united states, on the transnational labour force. in short, this suggests that in increasing proportion of the u.s. working class (though certainly not the u.s. working class as a whole) will fail under the technical definition of superexplo itat ion . but the consolidation of this tendency is not a foregone conclusion. the outcome will depend upon what direction class struggles take us. and these struggles promise to be fierce because industrial restructuring and per ipheral izat ion of centre societies must include heavy doses of "austerity." dixon e t al ( 1983: 183 ) tell us that the social, and eventually, the economic cost of austerity policies are high: aggravation of the social crisis and the creation of rising social unrest, and aggravation of the economic crisis by contracting the consumer market. von werholf (1984:132) asks: "if there is a worldwide economic crisis, then it means that everywhere economic changes will take place. but can these be implemented without the application of violence?" she goes on to make a foreboding comparison: from the countries that were the first and the quickest to set out for this change we hear daily of the brutal consequences: first chile, then great britain, then the united states. pinochet, thatcher, and reagan are applying the new medicine, the drastic treatment of the chicago boys of milton friedman. in discussing "austerity capitalism" dixon et al (1983:130) such a scenario portends potentially explosive conditions in u.s. cities. the response of the bourgeoisie must almost certainly involve greatly increased and institutionalized repression. in its most 13 extreme form, as we have written elsewhere, we are facing the implosion of empire -the beginning of an era in which the people of the united states will begin to see the democratic veils stripped away from the face of i. s. power; they will begin to experience what has been the fate of the colony. before i turn to a discussion of the implications of the restructuring of the international division of labour for the transformation of canadian society -a note on the possibility that this restructuring is not the panacea which will pull the capitalist world system out of its post-1960's economic depression is in order. magdoff and sweezy, writing in monthly review in recent years, foresee the renewal of dynamic accumulation as a shaky prospect. their analysis is based on a theory of stagnation formalized by baran and sweezy (1966). baran and sweezy note a long-run tendency toward stagnation in the capitalist accumulation process. they also note, however, that secular tendencies in the world economy have promoted renewed accumulation in the past. the post-1873 depression was overcome by the rapid spread of railway-building activity, and by the burst of colonial expansion referred to as the "new imperialism." the depression of the 1930's was overcome by war production, followed by the "automobi 1 izat ion" of the developed societies, and by the increasing transnational izat ion of the production process under u.s. hegemony. although there may be room for a global extension of these processes, magdoff and sweezy see no countertendenc ies on the order of those which pulled capital out of previous crises. 14 on the other hand wallerstein, writing in recent issues of review about cyclical rhythms of the world economy, suggests that if we can depend on past experiences, we may see the renewal of global accumulation as early as the 1990's. wallerstein bases his projections on the apparent regularity of 45-60 year waves of alternating boom and bust in the capital accumulation process-so-called long, or kondratieff waves ( kondrat ief f , 1926). longwave logic would suggest a boom based on the further extension of transnational capitalist production arising from innovations in transportation, communication and other technological "grey matter . " magdoff and sweezy, for their part, caution against ready reliance on long waves as a basis for economic projection. amin, going a step further, tells us that the current crisis has a twofold source: the challenge which the peoples and states of the periphery are posing to the conditions that fostered [the] "prosperity" [of the centre in the past] (energy and raw material crises, international division of labour, etc. ) and the resistance by the working classes in the west to a "readjustment" at their expense ( 1977b:35) . the present crisis is therefore a crisis of imperialism, and not of capitalism in general. it can be superseded only by socialist revolutions, or by a new stage of centralization of capital and of the international division of labour which would tend to bring the western world very much closer to the soviet (statist) mode [of production] (1977a:116). 15 canada in the new international division of labour canada is a country that resists ready classification within conventional taxonomies. its status as what might be aptly called a 'rich dependency' puts it at the interstices between the advanced industrial countries and the dependent capitalisms of the 'third world'. in terms of per capita income, patterns of consumption, social structure, and levels of education, as well as form of political regime, canada clearly resembles the former countries. in terms of the extent of foreign ownership and control over the economy and of canada's international trade pattern (export of resources and import of manufactured goods), canada looks more like belonging in the company of venezuela or nigeria ( panitch, 1985 : 1 ) . radical academics have not settled on a single explanation of the canadian anomaly. nay lor (1972) refers to "canadian branch plant quasi-imper ialism . levitt (1970) calls canada a "rich, industrialized, underdeveloped economy"; livingstone (1985) identifies it as a "secondary advanced capitalist formation"; and williams (1976) discusses canada as "the case of the wealthiest colony." panitch (1981) refers to canada as a "rich dependency" and critiques "neo-mercant il ist " and "high-wage proletariat" explanations for that status. in a recent discussion of so-called semi-peripheral zones 6 , arrighi and drangel (1986:55,62) classify canada as a centre country on the basis of "core-like industrial activities" and "the distribution of rewards in the world economy and the approximate position of states in relation to that distribution." but given the degree of canada's dependence on first britain and then the u.s., i find it hard to classify canada as a centre in its own right. here it seems useful to note clement's (1977) discussion of "continental corporate power" and lipietz' (1982:37) reference to the "process whereby systems of production 16 tend to 'overstep' national boundaries i leading 1 to the formation of huge blocs (the u.s.a. and canada, the e.e.c.)" (cf. teeple , 1 986 ) . whether one sees canada as a centre in its own right, or as a part of a "bloc" of continental corporate power, the important point for the present discussion is that canada has had a "high-wage" working class. however, over the last couple of decades that status has been threatened. in the 1960's left and liberal politicians and academics began to decry the "deindustrialization" of canada. caloren (1978) and laxer (1973) have presented data on plant shutdowns and worker layoffs -enough to show that the phenomenon of the "runaway shop" has hit canada with a vengeance. canada is especially vulnerable in this area because so much of canada's industry is foreign-owned. calvert (1984) tells us that. of canada's ten largest private corporations, six have three quarters or more foreign ownership, and a seventh is half foreign-owned. he also notes that there is a high degree of corporate concentration in manufacturing. it must be noted, of course, that foreign control of canadian manufacturing decreased from 59% in 1970 to 49% in 1979 (williams, 1986 ) . but this is more a sign of the deindustrialization process than an upsurge in nationalization. the point to be made of all this is that canada's manufacturing sector is particularly vulnerable to rationalization and shut-down trends in the present crisis because it is foreign-controlled. not only is it foreign17 controlled but, as williams (1986) and others have noted, canada has experienced import -substi tut ion industrialization over the last century -in canada's case branch plant industrialization. much "canadian" manufacturing was set up by foreign capital to serve primarily the domestic market. moreover, there is only a weak national grid of capital and commodity goods production. canada is locked into a canada-u.s. (continental) grid. control over most investment decisions and research and development are retained in the american head office. so the move toward a nidl, commencing with high-technology operations for the centre and low-skilled more labour-intensive .jobs for the periphery, leaves canada even more open to peripheral izat ion trends than the u.s. proper . while the more autocentric economies allow industrial restructuring for competition on the world market, canada's disarticulated, foreign-controlled economy is shown to have little resilience. williams (1983:9) cites one canadian state bureaucrat's note of "considerable evidence that canada-based subsidiaries of foreign-controlled companies are not aggressively seeking export opportunities abroad. because of corporate policy, many firms are either unable or unwilling to pursue projects abroad". and, to add insult to injury, williams (1983:42) notes how some bureaucrats in the department of industry, trade and commerce have "been concerned that branch plants in canada have used federal export assistance as a foot in the door for the sale of products from their foreign parents or 18 from associated subsidiaries in third countries" -a telling statement on canada's "independence"' laxer (1981:89) presents the findings of a government of ontario brief on problems in canadian manufacturing: the brief concluded that canada's manufacturing sector was 'not only weak but in a state of fundamental structural disequilibrium' . this disequilibrium was evidenced in the following symptoms : a process of deindustrial izat ion ; the decline in international competitiveness that has led to a deteriorating merchandise trade performance; the erosion of technological strength and capability in the manufacturing sector; and the persistence of a substantial productivity gap vis-a-vis the u.s. for moore and wells (1977:45): de-industrialization is, then, a myth. ... international capitalism in decline brings stagnation to all advanced countries -not just canada. american domination of canada is only a manifestation of a larger problem-the instability of world capitalism. i would suggest that so-called deindustrial izat ion is simply an aspect of the restructuring of the international division of labour (idl) and the peripheral ization of the centre. contributors to a recent volume on canada and the nidl have suggested that the process of de-industrialization is directly tied to the restructuring of the idl (cameron and houle, 1985). in this context the canadian state has felt the pressure to promote national industrial restructuring. recent liberal governments adopted nationalist policies which pointed in this 19 direction. but the present aovernment is placing all of its eggs in the basket of freer trade with the u.s. ( hi 11 lams , 1 986 ) . some left critics contend that the latter initiative simply removes the last impediments to the complete incorporation of canada into the l' . s . -dominated continental bloc, and portends a gloomy future for canadian manufacturing and any remaining vestiges of canadian independence ( teeple , 1 986 ) . in terms of the thesis being developed in this essay, canada-u.s. "free trade" deal is a subterfuge behind which the peripheral izat ion of the center will be accelerated -for the future of labour, both in canada and the u.s., promises to be even more gloomy than the future of some capitals ( gudmundson , 1986 ) . houle (1983) contends that industrial restructur ing-increasing organic composition of capital, deskilling and low wages -is the logic of transnational capital and the basis for the nidl. moreover, this logic is being applied to the canadian economy's mainstay -the resource sector. to remain competitive in the nidl, monopoly capital and the state have begun dispensing with the so-called fordist wage labour relationship -i.e. maintenance of high wages to ensure a consumer market. houle (1983:135-6) accounts for this change as follows: if the future of accumulation is based on energy resources, and the manufacturing sector upstream from them, a situation is created similar to that of the regime of extensive accumulation, where the prime mover of accumulation was first of all the sector of the means of production. the dominant form of production of surplus-value will remain, however, relative surplus-value. the development of this type of accumulation in canada would facilitate the integration of the canadian economy into a restructured world-capitalist economy, would respect what seem to be the 20 tendencies of the new international division of labour, and would not require the maintenance of the present growth model, nor, therefore, the maintenance of the fordist wagelabour relationship. in fact, the elimination of the latter, or at least its contraction, is a prerequisite for the submission of the canadian economy to the demands of the world market. to maintain the fordist wage-labour relationship the state would have to take over a sizeable share of surplus-value, and this seizure would endanger the place on the world market of canadian energy resources and of some branches of the sector of the means of production upstream from these. the question of the non-maintenance of the fordist-wage-labour relationship appears therefore to be inseparable from the crisis and from the restructuring of the regime of accumulation in relation to the international division of labour. according to houle this is the path down which the liberal government of prime minister trudeau began to tread in the 1970's. and the conservative government of prime minister mulroney has not strayed from this path. both governments have begun and continue cuts in social services and an assault on labour apparently recognizing that, as houle (1983:133) puts it, "to be worthwhile for capital, an end to the crisis must involve a major defeat of the popular classes by provoking a sizeable and lasting increase in the rate of exploitation." labour's acquiescence in the destruction of the welfare state has, until recently, been sought through tripartism and further integration of the workers' movement into liberal ideology. "when these measures are not sufficient to make wageearners accept a restructuring of the wage-labour relationship, the state resorts to the apparatus of repression (the judiciary and the police) to inflict defeats on the workers or to invalidate some of their gains" ( houle , 1983 : 1 35 ) . such moves are not new to canadian history. but their incidence has increased 21 since the crisis of the 1970's. calvert 11984) notes, for example, that there have been seventeen separate pieces of federal legislation directed against public sector unions alone since 1980. panitch and swartz (1985) see this as part of a general shift from "consent" to "coercion" in state/capitallabour relations. both capital and the state are pushing "austerity capitalism". laxer (1981:40) cites the prestigious business council on national issues' representative w.o. twaits' suggestions for renewed accumulation: a freeze on social programs; revisions to the unemployment insurance commission ( uic ) plan to make unemployment "less attractive"; restraint on new net government borrowing to release dollars to the private sector; -elimination of double taxation in the resource industries and decisions on critical energy projects, without which the economy has little prospect. these proposals were presented to a 1977 conservative party conference when the liberal party was still in power. twaits, a former chief executive officer of imperial oil, must be gratified that the new conservative government was not long in moving on his last proposal. but conservative and liberal governments alike are increasingly succumbing to the ideology of the new conservatism and attempt to legitimize the need for austerity and high 22 unemployment rates. according to gingrich (1978:97): "the state in most capitalist countries is in the process of instituting austerity programs against the working class". reducing expectations "is the means by which the politics of austerity is translated into practice at the individual or group level" (1978:98). the aim of propaganda is to persuade each family or individual to expect less, and as workers, demand less in wages. this is consciously stated by those like [liberal] finance minister chretien who trumpet the need for reduced inflationary expectations on everyone's part. they hope that wage demands will be voluntarily moderated, thus making it easier to reduce labour costs. wage controls, unemployment or increased taxation are used to actually reduce wages. the main purpose of impressing on workers the need for reduced expectations is a psychological one, that is, to change the perception of problems in such a way that austerity can be imposed with minimal amounts of dissent (1978:98-9). so while the state leads an attack on first inflation, then the state deficit as public enemy number one, politicians and bourgeois academics try to convince us that present high rates of unemployment are "normal". in the post-wwii boom years, the accepted wisdom was that unemployment rates of 3-4% were normal. now that official rates of unemployment are in the 10-12% range, new right economists and their political counterparts are telling the public that 10% unemployment is normal. but even keeping unemployment figures that low requires that whole sectors of the unemployed be "fudged" off the list -those employed part-time who wish full-time employment, those who have become discouraged and stopped looking for work, and those who, for one reason or another, have never made it onto the official rollcall 23 ( gingrich, 1 978 ) . officially canada's unemployed number about one and one-half million. unofficially, more like two million are unemployed l calvert , 1 984 ) . high levels of unemployment and underemployment are coming to be structured into the socioeconomic system. in this sense, we see the rise of the so-called underclass that prevails on the periphery. periods of unemployment grow longer, work alternatives are of increasingly lower status, and the myth of the male as family "breadwinner", already challenged in feminist literature, is even less certain. the family unit may survive, but more along third world lines where not just husband and wife, but all able family members must work to provide for subsistence. this will entail an increase in output by the "household economy" -part of the growing "informal economy." here goods and services are produced not only for the family, but for sale in the "underground" or "black economy." these variations of informal economy may not be new to residents of less-developed parts of canada (e.g. the maritime provinces) but they are a new and psychologically debilitating experience for residents of many areas. this is part of the experience that von werlhof (1984) refers to when she says that housework and the third world are the vision of the future. 7 this is the flipaide to the neo-conservat ive world of market freedom. but apparently, only the formally sanctioned market will be "free." canada's present conservative government, shortly after taking office, announced that it was "cracking 24 down" on earners of unreported income. an amnesty was announced in 1984 so that those who had received income from the informal economy could declare that income without recrimination. thereafter, the government's revenue and taxation department would "get tough." in a sea of free enterprise rhetoric, this was an obvious sign that the market is free for capital, but not for labour, and also a sign that the informal economy is expanding . the neo-conservative onslaught neo-conservat i ve rhetoric of free enterprise, free markets, and free trade has spread across canada. this is the rhetoric, though not the full reality, of the new federal conservative government. in announcing a new energy deal with alberta in the house of commons on march 28, 1985, the federal energy minister stated that "under deregulation the market will decide what crude oil prices should be." the code word here is "deregulation" -ostensibly the ideology of the new conservative government. the new defrocked minister of industry, trade and commerce sinclair stevens promised to get government out of the marketplace. he moved to do this by transforming the foreign investment agency ( fira a liberal government response to nationalist pressures of the 1960's and early 1970's) into investment canada -with a mandate not to monitor but to entice foreign investors. (foreign investment has more than doubled since the conservatives came to office.) and we now have a minister of privatization, whose sole 25 purpose is to promote economic renewal by turning crown corporations back to the "magic of the market." havemann (1986:14-5) asserts: arrogant, aggressive capital enmeshed in the high-tech indust r ial -mi 1 i tary complex, supported by elements in the bureaucracy, the media, federal and provincial governments, and sections of the churches and universities, seeks to dismantle even this (weak) version of the welfare state. their goal is to erode the hegemony of canada's seemingly liberal democratic ideology to build a state requiring 'exceptional' coercive powers over the working class. only bennett's social credit government in british columbia has come out with this as an overt policy, but a polarization of class interest will occur elsewhere as more canadians experience the forms of state-sponsored immiseration perpetrated by reagan, thatcher, and bennett in their support of the 'revolt of the rich.' havemann (1986:25) adds that "british columbia now has all the characteristics of an 'exceptional state' which blends neoconservative economic policy, new right social policy, and neofascist repression." and the recently elected social credit government of bill vander zalm does not appear likely to break out of this mold -campaign promises to the contrary notwithstanding. marchak (1984:31-2) commenting on the neo-conservati ve programs of premier bennett's government in b.c. states: "the ideology of this government is promoted in words such as restraint. incentives. productivity. efficiency. downsizing, privatization, free enterprise, high technology, the new economic real itr and our international competitive position. " marchak notes that two words are missing from the b.c. government's vocabulary -"unemployment" and "democracy." she says that the "omission of unemployment is a means of neglecting the 26 consequences of 'downsizing', 'restraint' and 'privatization'" (1984:36). to "delete the ideology of democracy is to provide the ground for deleting the forms as well... along with the welfare state" (1984:37). in recent years, thousands of public sector workers in b.c. have been fired. welfare services have been axed and hospitals and educational institutions across the province have been closed down or have lost state funding (magnusson et al . . 1984 ) . in addition to cutting social services spending, the b.c. government has closed its human rights and rentalsman's offices. "at the same time, greater expenditures have been directed toward private capital in the form of grants for technological changes, tax incentives, subsidies, infrastructure, marketing arrangements, etc." (marchak: 1985:4 ) . marchak (1985) contends that b.c.'s woes result largely from dependence, and that resource-rich b.c. is now becoming a periphery of japan as well as the u.s. she says "that b.c. has been developed as a resource periphery, and is fast becoming an underdeveloped country at the mercy of international corporations seeking low-wage labour" (ibid.:5). vancouver is beginning to earn itself the title of "hong kong west." the b.c. government has teamed up with b.c.'s rightwing "think" tank, the fraser institute, to advance this "newreality. " the institute, in its publications (e.g. grubel , 1983 ) , has been advocating the construction of "free market zones" (frobel et. al . ' s "free production zones" by another name), not 27 only in b.c. but across canada. according to a recent report in the globe and mail (november 29, 1984), the b.c. government has been negotiating with ottawa on plans to promote such zones (called "special enterprise zones" by the b.c. government itself). for its part, the federal government has recently proposed making montreal and vancouver international banking centres. but anyone familiar with examples such as panama knows this promises nothing but increasing hardship for the canadian masses . the free zones are proposed as a politically expedient alternative to a completely free market (i.e. per ipheral izat ion snuck in through the back door). but it is envisioned that the "demonstration effect" produced by free-zone successes would prompt the spread of the free market approach through the economy -a dubious proposition if judged by third world indicators. 8 one commentator ( 01 iver , 1985 ) contends that de facto free zones have already been initiated in b.c. -the expo (world trade fair) production site being one example. that site, and vancouver in general, was the scene of a militant labour struggle in 1984, in which the state legislated workers back to work and paved the way for no-union (and therefore low-wage) work sites. in the process, the bennett government adopted margaret thatcher's tactic of dividing the populace into two -in this case "good" british columbians who favour the "new economic reality" of restraint and restructuring, and "bad" british columbians who do not. 28 the question, 'who can work on the expo site?' is easilyanswered in the bennett code: "good" british columbians, of course. expo is the most ambitious of the new reality projects, not only because it exhibits the capacity of the "good people" to plan, organize, and build a world-class trade fair, but also because it is the testing ground for bennett's new reality union-busting strategy. by law, the expo site is open, an economic zone where anyone has the right to work except "bad" british columbians like union members. but even they can be redeemed. they can become "good" by going to work for a "new" and "real" construction company which is certain to bid $20,000 under union contractors on every tender ( 01 iver , 1985 : 7 ) . despite the recent re-election of the social credit party, labour and popular opposition to the peripheral izat ion process in b.c. (and now saskatchewan) suggests that there is a limit to which canada's heretofore high-wage population can be pushed. programs of economic restructuring and social service cuts in b.c. called forth a massive opposition in the form of b.c.'s "operation solidarity" -a coalition of labour (public and private sector -blue and white-collar), community organizations, feminist groups, etc. the fight-back developed an enormous base of popular support. in the lower mainland alone, three massive demonstrations occurred after july 7 [1983]: 25,000 marched the week following the budget introductions, 50,000 rallied at empire stadium in august (many walking off the job to attend). finally, exceeding all expectations, 60,000 marched around the socred convention on october 14, some carrying general strike placards and many chanting "socreds out." many people have become active for the first time and have developed a concern for a wide number of issues (larkin, 1984:4 ) . b.c.'s solidarity coalition demonstrates that there is a popular base for opposition to the peripheral izat ion trend (cf. havemann, 1986). the long-range potential, however, of solidarity-type coalitions clearly hinges on the problem of 29 leadership. many in b.c. were unhappy when reformist labour leaders "caved-in" to premier bennett and cancelled a provincewide general strike planned for november 14, 1983 (larkin, 1984). while the canadian labour congress (clc) has officially called for a "total mobilization" against neo-conservat i ve attacks on labour, the capacity of the presently reformist clc leadership and structure to affect such a mobilization must be questioned. in their march 1984 editorial, the editors of canadian dimension commented : this is the third consecutive issue in which dimension has covered the activities of b.c.'s operation solidarity and solidarity coalition. our coverage will continue, not only because of the importance of solidarity's struggle in b.c., but because we expect it to recur elsewhere in canada... the aggression with which capital and the state have responded to the crisis in capitalism necessitate a new form of trade union politics -a politics of confrontation in which the organization and mobilization of membership and creation of coalitions take on added importance. some leaders of trade unions and popular organizations have not yet made this adjustment. conclusion--w( h) ither canada? in this essay i have attempted to set present trends in canadian society into the context of a changing world economy-with an emergent new international division of labour and a peripheral ization of centre societies. in this light, we see that phenomena such as deindustrial izat ion and state attacks on welfare are not peculiar to canada. they are part of a restructuring of the world economy and a redefinition of the social status of workers of centre and periphery. amin 30 (1981:xvi) contends: "there is still a qualitative difference between centres and peripheries." but this is not to deny that there is a move afoot to restructure social relations as part of the transnational izat ion of the production process itself. most important, for the majority of centre workers, is the restructuring of the fordist wage-labour relationship to turn relatively privileged sectors into a low-skilled, low-waged labour force attractive to transnational capital. this is the logic of transnational capital. but as marchak (1984) points out in her discussion of b.c., there is absolutely no guarantee that peripheral i zat ion of the centre will bring "high-tech" investment . yet eric trigg, chairman of alcan aluminum, and thomas bata, president of bata shoes, speaking on cbc radio's "ideas" (april 3, 1985), tell us that canadian industry must be restructured for world market production or it will wither away. this may be true for transnational corporations like alcan and bata, but small and medium capitals in canada are suffering because their mainstay-the domestic market -is being eroded by unemployment and low wage settlements. calvert (1984:8) note3 that from 1978 to 1982, real wages dropped by ix. from 1977 to 1983, business and consumer bankruptcies rose by 122% (ibid.:"). most bankruptcies are in small business. small and medium capitals thus wither up and are absorbed by large capital as centralization and concentration accelerates. 9 monopoly banks and oil companies make exorbitant profits. 31 all of this should serve to emphasize a point which has been made at least since marx and engels' time -that capitalism is fraught with contradictions. the logic of transnational capital may be toward a peripheral izat ion of the centre. but reducing labour costs to improve competitive ability on the (hardly competitive) world market is certainly not logical when we consider that the basis for that market is the same high-wage labour which is under attack. this contradiction immediately strikes small and medium national capitals. the state, for its part, is caught in a bind of trying to organize the demands of labour and the various capitals in such a way as to ensure hegemonic class domination. canadian rulers must be sensing the possibility of social upheaval. in recent years, our popular media began to pick up signs that the canadian state is preparing for increased internal "instability". at the turn of the decade, the canadian military began to acquire vehicles with the sole purpose of "crowd control". in 1982, the canadian government announced that it was readying plans for "internment (concentration) camps". this news came to light because then solicitor general robert kaplan did not feel it politically expedient to acquiesce in such a plan. prime minster trudeau had no qualms about the plan, but then he had no qualms about a hasty institution of the war measures act to "solve" the quebec crisis of 1970. frank (1980) has noted that the chinese word for "crisis" can also be translated as "opportunity." certainly the present 32 conjuncture presents canadian labour with the opportunity of coalescing with other popular sectors and small business in opposition to the pe r lphe ral 1 zat ion of the centre. panitch, noting recent events such as the canad iani zat ion of the united auto workers, suggests that canadian labour as a whole is confronted with the opportunity of overcoming its regionallyand sectorally-div ided past. "the prospects for socialist advance in canada are by no means rosy, but one of the preconditions for it -the forging of greater national identity and unity of the working class -stands a better chance today than at any time in the past" ( panitch, 1985 : 12 ) . dixon et al . (1983:190-1) go so far as to assert that: the future presents great dangers and great opportunities for the u.s. working c lass . . . . [ f ] or the first time since the 1930's, the possibility of a revolutionary situation is emerging at the center of traditional core power, in the heart of the united states. in light of the per ipheral izat ion of the centre, this conclusion has some logic -if we accept that the centre of world revolution is in the periphery (cf. amin, 1977a; cwg , 1986). there is reason to argue that the extreme social dislocation and superexplo i tat ion that accompanies the per ipheral izat ion process will provide the "objective" conditions for revolution. 10 however, workers in the u.s. and canada have been steeped in 1 iberalindividual ism in the post wwii period (o'connor, 1984). some argue that centre working classes in general have been bought into imperialist superexplo l tat ion of workers in the periphery through reformism and social democracy (cwg, 1986). 33 at any rate, given amin's above noted contention that the present crisis is a crisis of imperialism, workers' struggles in the centre would have to be ant iimperial ist struggles to be part of a socialist solution to that crisis. and a look at third world revolutions themselves should tell us that socialist struggles in the centre must be broad-based popular struggles and not the sort of pure working-class struggles that marxists have long expected. progressive church, community and women's struggles are essential ingredients (cf. havemann, 1986). we must conclude with the hope that the trend toward a per ipheral i zat ion of the centre is simply part of a long-range world-socialist transformation, not a slide into barbarism. notes 1. debates on the "new international division of labour" and on the "peripheral izat ion of the centre" can be found in the journals, contemporary marxism and review . and in the political economy of the world-system annuals. 2. i must note that i think " semi -per iphery" is more a static category than a relational concept. amin (1983:56) contends: "the category ' semi-periphery '... seems to me misleading for the following reasons: 1) the major distinction between the centre and the per iphery ... concerns wage trends; 2) on the whole wages in the centre tend to rise with productivity, while in the periphery wages stagnate or lag behind productivity increases; 3) to the extent that wages in the 'semi-periphery' behave in a fashion similar to that of the periphery, despite other differences that may exist there is no such thing as a semiperiphery. " 3. the capitalist world economy is often referred to as the european world economy because of its birth in northwestern europe -despite the fact that non-european states such as japan and the u.s. now hold core status in the world economy (cf. wallerstein, 1979). 34 4. "superexploitation is the appropriation by capital of so many of the fruits of the workers' labour that the workers cannot maintain themselves or reproduce their labour power. in each major crisis of accumulation, capital has resorted to increased exploitation and superexploitation somewhere in the world" ( frank, 1981 : 157 ) . 5. "free production zones are industrial areas which are separated off from the rest of the country, located at places where labour is cheap and designated as sites for world market oriented industry; world market factories are factories which are built on these sites, but can also be situated elsewhere, and intended for the industrial utilization of the available labour and the processing of goods destined essentially for the markets of the industrialized countries. in 1975, seventy-nine free production zones were in operation in twenty-five underdeveloped countries; eleven of these countries were in asia, five in africa and nine in latin america" (frobel et al . , 1 980 : 22 ) . since that time, the free-zone "craze" has spread, with even "socialist" china getting into the act by designating fourteen free zones in coastal areas [marshall, 1984). though free zone exports have hardly taken over the world market as yet, the growth trend for free-zone areas is clear (cf. hall iday, 1980 ) . 6. see note two above. 7. women are being particularly hard hit by the neoconservative onslaught. havemann (1986:20) speaks of british columbia "legislation to encourage women to return to the private realm of the family in order to fulfill their 'rightful' place", noting: "the burden of care has been shifted to families and in particular to women." but all too often women's "rightful place" also includes new forms of degraded and often dangerous contract work which is done in the home. 8. as to the "demonstration effect" of the third world free zone "export-led" growth model, frank (1981:103-107) has the following to say: 1. not external balance, but foreign debts are promoted because foreign exchange earnings are limited while import expenditures and indebtedness to finance them seems to grow without limit . . . 2. the promise that manufacturing for export will result in technical training of the labour force and technological development of the economy is belied by the logic of and extensive experience with such manufacturing throughout the third world. . . 3. the promise of increased employment and the elimination or amelioration of unemployment through export of even all industry is an illusion at best, and more likely a 35 delusion. . . 4. the summary claim that "export substitution" and "export promotion" of manufacture lead to "export-led growth and economic development " is belied by many of our findings with regard to the more specific claims about export earnings, technical and technological development, and employment. but manufacturing export promotion has many other drawbacks . . . the other drawbacks which frank goes on to discuss are the human costs incurred through the superexploitation of labour and violent repression of human rights upon which the transnational production process has come to depend. (ostensibly, the charter of rights and freedoms in the new canadian constitution would preclude such human rights abuses in canada. but civil rights activists claim that the charter "has no teeth.") when all is said and done, it is not even certain that the t ransnat ional izat ion of production will pull capital out of its global crisis. 9. the economic council of canada (1984:104) argues that "the manufacturing sector has not withered and is not withering in the face of increased compe t i t ion . . . [ t ] he upshot of this is that canada is a far cry from deindustrial izat ion . in our considered judgement, there is no evidence of this process even beginning." but holmes and leys (1987:21) note "that this conclusion, while denying that canada is experiencing deindustrial izat ion does not preclude (and in fact strongly implies) that canadian manufacturing nevertheless has been, and is, experiencing a period of significant industrial reorganization and restructuring. 10. should this notion require pedigree, see marx and engels' comments on the "silesian weavers revolt" of 1844 (cf. draper, 1977: 174ff). references amin, samir 1977a imperialism and unequal development . new york: monthly review press. 1977b "capitalism, state collectivism, and socialise. " monthly review . vol. 29, no. 2 (june 1977). 1981 "preface" in f. clairmonte and j. cavanagh, the world in their web . london: zed press, 1981. 1983 "a.g. frank and the crisis". monthly review. vol. 35, no. 6 (nov. 1983). 36 1984 "income distribution in the capitalist system," review , vol. 8, no. 1 (summer 1984). arrighi, giovanni and jessica drangel 1986 "the stratification of the world economy: an exploration of the semiperi pheral zone," review, vol. 10, no. 1 (summer 1986). baran, paul and paul sweezy 1966 monopoly capital . new york: monthly review press. barnet, richard and ronald muller 1974 global reach: the power of the multinational corporal ions . new york: simon & schuster. braverman, harry 1974 labor and monopoly capital . new york: monthly rev iew press . caloren, fred 1978 "the logic of layoffs and factory closures: cases occurring when 'times were bad'", in f. caloren et al . , is the canadian economy closing down . montreal: black rose books, 1978. calvert , john 1984 government, limited: the corporate takeover of the public sector in canada. ottawa: canadian centre for policy alternatives. cameron, duncan and francois houle (eds. ) 1985 canada and the new international division of labour . ottawa: university of ottawa press. clement, wallace 1977 continental corporate power: economic linkages between canada and the united states. toronto: mcclelland and stewart. cwg (communist working group) 1986 unequal exchange and the prospects of socialism. copenhagen: manifest press. dixon, marlene, susanne jonas and ed mcgaughan 1983 "changes in the international division of labor and low-wage labor in the united states," in a. bergeser, ( ed . ) , crises in the world-system . beverly hills: sage publications, 1983. 37 draper. hal 197" karl marx's theory of revolution: state and bureaucracy new york: monthly review press. economic council of canada 1984 the bottom line . ottawa: economic council of canada, frank, andre gunder 1980 crisis: in the world economy . new york: holmes and meier publishers. 1981 crisis: in the third world. new york: holmes and meier publishers. frobel, folker, jurgen heinrichs and otto kreye 1980 the new international division of labour . cambridge: cambridge university press. gingrich, paul 1978 "unemployment and capitalist crisis," in f. caloren et al . , is the canadian economy closing down? . montreal: black rose books, 1978. grubel , herbert 1983 free market zones: deregulating canadian enterprise . vancouver: the fraser institute. gudmundson, fred 1986 "free trade: the real agenda," canadian dimension . vol. 20, no. 5 (sept. -oct. 1986). halliday, jon 1980 "capitalism and socialism in east asia," new left review . no. 124 (nov. -dec. 1980). havemann, paul 1986 "marketing, the new establishment ideology in canada," crime and social justice , no. 26. holmes, john and colin leys (eds. ) 1987 frontyard/backyard : the americas in global crisis . toronto: between the lines. houle, francois 1983 "economic strategy and the restructuring of the fordist wage-labour relationship in canada," studies in political economy . no. 11 (summer 1983). 38 jones, susanne and marlene dixon 1980 "proletarianization and class alliances in the americas," in t, hopkins and i. wallerstein (eds. i, processes of the world-system . beverly hills: sage publications, 1980. kondratieff, nikolai 1926 the long wave cycle . new york: richardson 4 snyder, 1984. larkin, jackie 1984 "the generals didn't strike," canadian dimension , vol. 18, no. 1 (march 1984). laxer, james 1973 "canadian manufacturing and u.s. trade policy," in r. laxer ( ed . ) , (canada) ltd. toronto: mcclelland and stewart, 1973. 1981 canada's economic strategy . toronto: mcclelland and stewart . levitt, kari 19 70 silent surrender: the multinational corporation in canada toronto: macmillan of canada. lipietz, alain 1982 "towards global fordism?", new le ft review . no. 132, (march-april 1982). livingstone, d. w. 1985 social crisis and schooling . toronto: garamond press . magnusson, warren et al . (eds.) 1984 the new reality: the politics of restraint in british columbia . vancouver: new star books. marchak, patricia 1984 "the new economic reality: substance and rhetoric," in w. magnusson et al . (eds.), the new reality . vancouver: new star books, 1984. 1985 "the ideology of restraint," canadian dimension . vol. 18, no. 6 (dec. 1984-jan. 1985). marshall , jane 1984 "china extends open door trade policy," manchester guardian weekly, july 29, 1984. 39 moore, steve and debi wells 197" "the myth of canadian deindus tr iai i zat ion , " in c. heron ( ed . ) , imperialism. nationalism and canada . toronto: new hogtown press, 1977. say lor, tom 1972 "the rise and fall of the third commercial empire of the st. lawrence," in g. teeple ( ed . ) , capitalism and the national question in canada. toronto: university of toronto press, 1972. o'connor, james 1984 accumulation c risis. oxford: basil blackwell. oliver, thelma 1985 "the bennett code: a beginner's guide to b.c.," canadian dimension . vol. 18, no. 6 (dec. 1984-jan. 1985). panitch, leo 1981 "dependency and class in canadian political economy," studies in political economy . no. 6 (autumn 1981). 1985 "class and power in canada," monthly review . vol. 36, no. 11 (april 1985). panitch, leo and donald swartz 1985 from consent to coercion: the assault on trade union freedoms toronto: garamond press. pet ras , james 1981 class. state and power in the third world . montclair: allanheld, osraun. teeple, gary 1986 "north american free trade: the last debate," two thirds . vol. 7, no. 3 (fall 1986). von werlhof, claudia 1984 "the proletarian is dead: long live the housewife " in s. smith et al . (eds.), households in the world economy . beverly hills: sage publications, 1984. vuskovic, pedro 1980 "latin america and the changing world economy," nacla report on the americas . vol. 14, no. 1 (jan. -feb. 1980) . wallerstein, immanuel 1979 the capitalist world-economy . cambridge: cambridge university press. 40 williams, glen 1976 "canada-the case of the wealthiest colony," this magazine , vol. 10, so. 1 (feb. -march 1976). 1983 "still not for export," canadian forum, vol. 63, no, 732 (oct. 1983). williams, glen 1986 not for ex port : toward a political economy of canada's arrested industrialization . toronto: mcclelland and stewart. 41 71 european capitalism: varieties of crisis ingo schmidt abstract: the article rejects the notion that countries of the eu periphery, some of which were recently labelled as piigs, are prone to fiscal and sovereign debt crises because of spend-thrifty governments and their negative impact on private investments. as an alternative to such views, the article argues that the eu periphery is prone to crisis because its economies can’t successfully compete with exports from core countries, especially germany. it will also be argued that world market integration in a time of economic stagnation, combined with an explosion of debt, speculation and recurrent financial crisis, is no way to overcome a country’s peripheral position. these arguments will be developed on the basis of some mini case studies on core and peripheral eu member states. keywords: european capitalism, centre-periphery relations, fiscal crisis, sovereign debt crisis introduction in the midst of the 2008/9 crisis of the world economy (european commission 2009), a new term crept into financial parlance: piigs, short for: portugal, ireland, italy, greece, spain. at that time, the broader public was still trying to understand the meaning of cdos (collateralized debt obligations), cdss (credit default swaps), and other fancy financial products including their role in the financial crisis. governments and central bankers were busy working to contain a sharp recession and save private profits with huge infusions of zero-interest credit, government spending and bank bailouts. as a result of these efforts, the crisis of private finance and capital more generally was transformed into a fiscal crisis of the state. neoliberal economists and media pundits happily used their chance to point at rapidly rising levels of public deficits and debt but downplayed the share european capitalism: varieties of crisis 72 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research of bank-bailouts in rising deficits. at the same time, they constructed the piigs to show how spend-thrifty governments run the risks of capital flight and state bankruptcy. the old familiar message: states, not markets, are the problem. since states can’t be totally abolished—after all, they serve capital interests quite well as protectors of private property and spenders of last resort—one has to carefully distinguish between good and bad. good states turn the fiscal tap off as soon as big money asks them to do so. bad states are either unwilling or too weak to turn to austerity once big money sees that as a necessity. bad states need to be punished by disinvestment that will deplete their finances and drive them into the arms of financial parole officers like the imf who offer urgently needed credit at high interest rates and unwanted policy advice. retired government officials from around the world, from then socialist eastern europe through the global south to the asian tigers and post-soviet russia can tell of their experiences with fiscal and sovereign debt crisis and imf-intervention. yet, the wall street crash and its aftermath offered an ironic turn of capitalist history. when the dow jones was plunging and investment banks were defaulting, a number of european governments used the chance to advocate their variety of regulated capitalism as superior to the american model of free market capitalism. then german finance minister steinbrück, a third way social democrat and usually a good atlanticist, went so far as to proclaim the end of dollar-supremacy. but then the piigs destroyed the european dream of a multilateral world in which american great power politics would be replaced by european multilateralism. rising levels of public and foreign debt, the neoliberal argument went, put the piigs at risk of state bankruptcy. in the spring 2010, greece, apparently the weakest member of this group, came close to bankruptcy, indeed. however, the reason was neither an uncontrollable explosion of debt, nor runaway inflation that neoliberal theory presents as an inevitable by-product of government debt. the risk of the greek state defaulting was produced by international financiers who, fired up by the neoliberal piigs-story, denied credit to the greeks at a rate of interest that would have allowed continuing circulation of capital within the country and beyond its borders. a €110bn credit from the eu, which the imf co-sponsored and enriched by a structural adjustment program, solved this acute fiscal and sovereign debt crises, momentarily at least. this intervention, which essentially represents another case of throwing public money at private finance, certainly satisfies the short-term interests of international financiers. whether it helps to avoid recurrent crises in the future is another question though. in this article, it will be argued that the reasons for the greek crisis (moschovis, servera 2009) were not the ones presented in the piigs-story. 73 this story neglects three factors that are crucial for an understanding of the greek crisis. first, it does not recognize that the current account deficits of one country are matched by respective surpluses of other countries. second, poor countries are not the only ones who produce deficits (european commission 2010). current accounts and public households in the us and britain, to name just the most two outstanding examples, are as deep in the red as those of the average piigs-state. third, governments and central banks can’t freely choose to either run deficits or surpluses; they may try either way but the ultimate outcome of their efforts will be determined by the competition for world market share. this competition has considerably stiffened during the neoliberal era. during that era, some states, like britain and the us, found out that they can afford to run deficits and actually make them part of their accumulation strategy while greece and countless other peripheral countries, were pushed into deficits by stronger competitors and then found structural adjustment policies imposed onto them. presenting experiences from a number of eu countries, this article will look at centre – periphery relations, macroeconomic imbalances and the design of the emu as key factors that can explain why speculative attacks against an economically small country like greece, contributing about 2.5% to the eu’s total gdp, translated into a severe crisis of european capitalism (european central bank 2010). these case studies will show how neoliberal capitalism could successfully be established in the west, in some cases against left strategies of socialist transformation, and invade eastern europe after the collapse of the soviet empire. they will also show that the crisis of neoliberal capitalism in europe takes on a variety of different forms, which depend on a countries’ position in the hierarchy of states and world markets. case studies on the crisis of european capitalism the country sample under consideration here connects the core countries france, germany, and the uk, to the peripheral country greece, ireland, and hungary. italy is included in this sample because its position as part of the eu core was recently challenged by its inclusion into the piigs-group. in this sample, germany is the bullying powerhouse that puts weaker economies under competitive pressure through the export-orientation of many of its companies and the hardcore neoliberalism its political class managed to inscribe into eu-institutions. german export success is often presented as the result of high savings, hard work, and long-term perspectives as opposed to the allegedly wasteful way of short-term speculation in the anglo-saxon world. however, while it is true that the financial markets in the us play a key role in neoliberal capitalism, and the city of london can certainly be seen as the european outpost of the dollar-wallstreet-regime (gowan 1999), it is also true that german capitalists happily funnel european capitalism: varieties of crisis 74 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research their money through the financial centres in london and new york. thus, the picture of european capitalism would be incomplete without understanding how the uk, once the workshop of the world, developed into such a powerful centre of world finance. the recurrent quests of france to complement the european central bank (ecb) and its political impact on accumulation with some sort of economic government on the eu level is often understood as a keynesian alternative to the combined powers of germany’s export economy and british financial markets. yet, it will be shown that french keynesianism was defeated by the interplay of domestic and international forces in the early 1980s. since then, french governments have embraced, not always as successfully as they were hoping, neoliberalism and seek to institute european economic policies in such a way that would compensate french capital for its competitive disadvantages vis-à-vis german export companies and british financial firms. the italian experience represents the significance of centre-periphery relations within the eu. on the one hand, italian governments are constantly struggling to keep the country’s place in the core group of eu powers, which didn’t stop international finance from classifying italy as part of the piigs. on the other hand, centre – periphery divisions within the country have posed a key problem of internal cohesion which has undermined italy’s position within the eu. the inability to overcome such divisions domestically contains some lessons for the future of the eu with its even deeper divisions between centres and peripheries. another variation of this theme is the irish case. for a while, ireland seemed to prove neoliberal claims according to which free trade within the eu would allow poor countries to catch-up to the rich countries. however, neither a temporary spurt in foreign direct investment nor a housing boom could prevent a us-style financial crisis in ireland. hopes to catch up with the rich were not only dashed in ireland but in hungary, too. like other eastern european countries after the collapse of the soviet empire, hungarians had to recognize that a place in the periphery was all the eu had for them. the last of the mini case studies in this article looks at greece, which is obvious because this was the first target among the piigs. apart from that, greece shows that even a country that could never aspire to escape its peripheral position can play key roles for the core countries. greece’s enormously big merchandise fleet and its strategic position as a nato-outpost on the borders to the muslim and arabic worlds are indispensible for european capitalism and its american allies. germany: export über alles in the early 1990s, when the terms and conditions of european monetary union (emu) were negotiated, the german export-model, which was established 75 with us-support after wwii and maintained its dominant position in world markets even during the crisis-ridden 1970s and the growth slowdown of the 1980s, was under stress. accession of formerly socialist east germany to capitalist west germany in 1990 had boosted domestic demand including government spending significantly and produced current account and public deficits that reminded the german bourgeoisie of the much despised twin deficits their american friends and mentors were running under reagan and bush senior. germany’s balance on current accounts deteriorated from a 4.2%-surplus 1986-90 to a -1.2%-deficit in 1991-95, public deficits increased from -1.4% to -2.8% over the same period.1 in an attempt to reign in its deficits, regain current account surpluses and extend its mercantilist model of accumulation (schmidt, 2007) to all prospective emu members, the german government pushed for tight limits on public deficits and debts, 3% and 60% of gdp respectively, and a maximum inflation rate of 2% as a precondition of emu membership. the institutionalization of austerity policies in the maastricht treaty, 1992, and the stability and growth pact, 1997, helped germany to re-start its export-oriented growth machine (see tables 1&2) after recessions in 1993 and 2002/3. constant pressures on government spending and wages kept inflation and unit labour costs low. yet, the same means that spurred exports put a lid on domestic growth. as a result, current account surpluses were soaring, producing complementary deficits on the side of most of germany’s trading partners, and increasing the german economy’s dependence on demand created elsewhere (lapavitsas, 2010, ch. 2-4). this dependence on foreign markets notwithstanding, the german ruling class is clinging to its export-orientation and keeps on pointing at other countries’ deficits as a source of financial instability, although they are largely a result of german export surpluses. france: european integration as a means against german domination french governments used european integration in the post-war period as a means to contain germany’s real or perceived appetites for dominance (parsons, 2003). this was true for the 1950s european steel and coal community that subordinated german heavy industries, the long-time economic backbone behind german imperialism, to multilateral control. french consent to the emu, including germany’s austerity prescriptions, was also motivated by an attempt to tie postunification germany into multilateral institutions. german governments agreed to this kind of political containment by integration because they clearly understood that the us, the unchallenged though sometimes unloved leader of the western bloc, supported germany’s transformation from a great political power into an economic export power. 1 all data in the text: european commission. european capitalism: varieties of crisis 76 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research hosting the world’s largest corporations and controlling the world’s money, the us found it easier to cope with german export competition than the french. however, this does not mean that the french bourgeoisie was necessarily hostile to the monetarist principles that germany used, even in the keynesian era from the 1950s to the 1970s, to fuel its export machine. faced with a socialist-communist coalition government that tried to stem the general tide from keynesianism to monetarism in the early 1980s, french capitalists were quite happy that the german bundesbank’s tight monetary policies put pressure on the french balance of payments. a perfect invitation to capital flight, which was then used to urge the socialists in the government to abandon their left-keynesian program and offend their communist coalition partners (lombard, 1995). the french bourgeoisie was as eager as their german, american and other counterparts to embrace neoliberalism. thus, french quests for eu-wide coordination of macroeconomic policies are not inspired by attempts to pursue keynesian policies but are a recognition of the superior competitiveness and market power of german export industries. policy coordination, from this angle, is meant to contain current account deficits and its negative impact on domestic growth and employment. considering how much the french balance on current account deteriorated since the introduction of the euro in 1999, which eliminated the possibility to limit imports through currency devaluations (see table 2), it is understandable that the current euro-crisis was accompanied by french complaints about germany’s beggar-thy-neighbour policies and new quests for macroeconomic policy coordination within the emu. britain: euro-dollars in the city rather than euros all over britain while the post-war boom allowed germany to emerge as an export powerhouse, british industries were struggling with underinvestment and permanent current account deficits. unlike france, where similar deficits were caused by the late development of large corporations, compared to its main competitor germany, british deficits were the result of relative industrial decline (kitson, michie, 1996). and whereas the french ruling class eventually decided to follow the german way of promoting national champions as core of their neoliberal model, the british bourgeoisie not only accepted but furthered industrial decline in favour of its financial sector (radice, 1995). the shift from industrial production to financial industries was so successful that britain—the city of london, to be more precise—could emerge as the european outpost of the dollar wall street regime (gowan, 1999; gowan, 2009). obviously the city never enjoyed the close connections and support that the us treasury offered, and still offers, to wall street. yet, in one respect, the city was even more attractive to profit-hungry investors than wall street: its euro-dollar markets bypassed us regulations and thus offered the least political control over financial flows and holdings. naturally, the british government was 77 eager to maintain this competitive advantage and thus rejected emu right from the start. ironically, a number of multinational corporations that discovered britain as a low cost and union free location in the 1990s advocated for british membership in the emu in order to limit the costs and risks associated with exchange rate fluctuations. emu membership would have helped to turn britain into a major site of transplant production to serve eu markets. yet, the city’s successful resistance against such plans made ireland a more attractive destination for foreign direct investments in the late 1990s and early 2000s. just as in the us, britain’s dominant position in international financial markets went hand in hand with a depletion of household savings, a surge in real estate prices and debt-financed consumption. though the tories had paved the way, the british bubble economy really took off under new labour. private household savings declined from 4.7% of gdp in 1991-95 to 2.2% in 1996-2000 to -0.1% in 2001-5 (see also table 3), while gdp growth went from 1.6% to 3.4% and 2.5% over the same period. though not impressive, this is more than the german combination of exports and domestic austerity had accomplished (respective growth rates for germany are: 2.2%, 2.0%, and 0.6%; see also table 1). because of britain’s leading position in international financial markets, the financial crisis hit the british economy earlier and harder than other countries. crisis containment consequently needed much higher doses of fiscal stimulus, which brought the british deficit close to the levels reached by the financial superpower america and peripheral countries in europe, such as greece and ireland (see table 2). italy: subordination to euro-austerity to escape regional disparity from its early days, italian capitalism developed in a highly uneven way that led to a deep polarization between the industrial north and the rural south (goldstein, 1998). in the 1960s, the italian bourgeoisie thought about the use of the keynesian state to overcome this north – south divide. yet, because the bourgeoisie was fractured as the country was divided economically, no consensus towards such an industrial policy extension of keynesian demand management could be reached. in the 1970s, the italian communists picked up this project as a building bloc towards the historical compromise with the conservatives who had dominated italian politics in the post-war period but were thrown into a crisis of legitimacy and strategic reorientation by the class struggles and economic crisis of the late 1960s and 1970s. like in france and britain, key organizations of the left sought to use industrial policies as a means of a gradual transformation from the keynesian welfare state towards socialism. however, the italian version of this strategy, euro-communism, failed as much as the common program of the french socialist and communist parties and the alternative economic strategy of the british labour party. european capitalism: varieties of crisis 78 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research the neoliberal turn in italy abandoned attempts to overcome the north – south divide by political means and put praise for regional economies and industrial districts in its place (piore, sabel, 1984). however, while northern italy was integrated into emerging international supply chains, the italian south remained as dependent on fiscal transfers from rome as ever. continuing divisions between the northern core and its southern periphery were a source for right-wing regionalism, political tensions, a clientele state and the concomitant accumulation of public debt. eventually, export-oriented factions of the italian bourgeoisie, in conjunction with the post-keynesian socialist party, saw emu as a chance to escape the negative impact that political instability, accumulation of debt and recurrent currency devaluations had on their strategy of integration into international supply-chains. the outcomes of italy’s subordination to emu’s policy guidelines were mixed. public deficits were reduced from -11.5% in 1986-90 to -9.0 in 1991-95 to -3.0 in 1996-2000, but growth also slowed from 3.1 to 1.3 and 1.9, respectively, over the same period. unemployment went from 9.4 to 9.8 and 11.0, respectively. slow growth since the introduction of the euro helped to keep imports and thus current account deficits lower than in other countries that had higher growth rates. thus, dependence on capital imports to finance such deficits is lower than in many of eu’s peripheral member states, modest public deficits make the country a lesser target for speculative attacks like the one greece experienced in the spring of 2010 (see table 2). however, emu membership was anything but a way to solve italy’s long-time problem of uneven development. ireland: showcase of neoliberal development gone bust most, if not all, core and peripheral countries in europe experienced a growth slowdown after the crisis-ridden 1970s. in this respect, they resemble core countries and peripheries in other parts of the world. however, at any point in time there were also countries that could escape the tendency to economic stagnation: japan in the 1980s, the so-called asian tigers in the 1990s, and china from the 1980s until today. ireland earned the title of celtic tiger because its growth accelerated from 3.8% in 1974-85 to 4.6% in 1986-90 to 4.7% in 1991-95 to a peak level of 9.6% in 1996-2000. everything neoliberals ever said about free trade as a means to promote growth seemed to be true in ireland. the european single market program, which was launched in the mid-1980s and completed in the 1990s, coincided with a surge of foreign direct investments (fdis) and growth. neoliberal economists see enhanced possibilities to move capital across borders as a key to higher growth rates. yet, if this would be true, irish growth in the 1980s and 1990s should have been the european rule rather than its exception. arguably, the irish experience owes more to the accumulation strategies of us79 corporations than to the growth-effects of free trade (o’hearn, 2001). parallel to britain’s transformation into the european outpost of the dollar wall street regime, ireland became a prime location for low cost production within the european single market and, later, the emu. production in ireland allowed us-corporations to bypass import restrictions that goods coming from outside the single market are still facing. moreover, irish membership in the emu eliminated the risks associated with fluctuating exchange rates. yet, the ensuing foreign investment boom led to increasing control of foreign corporations over ireland’s economic and social development and was also accompanied by increasing social polarization (kirby, 2004). even in purely economic terms, fdis had questionable results. first, the high volatility of fdi-flows translates into an unstable process of capital formation (see table 1). second, a significant share of foreign and domestic capital fuelled a us-style housing and consumption boom that used up much of ireland’s private household savings (see table 3). third, though fdis massively contributed to the build-up of export production capacities they also led to high levels of parts imports. together with the import of consumer goods that were spurred by the combined booms in housing speculation and consumption, ireland was barely able to run current account surpluses at the height of its boom in the late 1990s. in the early 2000s, its current account turned negative. the boom in ireland was dependent on fdi-inflows, soaring house prices and debt-financed consumption. the world economic crisis in 2008/9 led to netoutflows of fdis and a collapse of the housing market that had been so vital in propping up consumption. the combined effect of fdi-outflows and a plunging housing market made the crisis in ireland much more severe than in the us or britain, two countries that were also confronted with housing bubbles going bust but weren’t dependent on fdi-inflows like ireland was (kanda, 2010). as a result, unemployment doubled from 4.7% in 2007 to 11.9% in 2009. fiscal stimulus and a collapse of tax revenue drove public deficits to levels higher than in greece (see table 2) and led to an explosion of public debt from 25% of gdp in 2007 to 64% in 2009. to contain the ensuing fiscal crisis and avoid outside intervention from the eu and/or imf, the irish government turned to pre-emptive austerity as early as late 2008 (imf 2009). most likely, these policies will trigger a period of stagnation, during which the government won’t be able to successfully consolidate public finances because of insufficient tax revenues. no western european country was flying as high as ireland before the crisis, but no other country was affected as badly by the crisis either. european capitalism: varieties of crisis 80 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research hungary: lost between the soviet empire and the empire of capital the implosion of the soviet empire in the early 1990s led to a period of economic downturn and political instability across eastern europe. these were the conditions under which new capitalist classes struggled to constitute and consolidate themselves. eu membership appeared as one of the ways to achieve this goal (green & petrick, 1999). in this respect, hungary is just one case in point (andor, 2000). like other eastern european countries who found themselves on the periphery of world capitalism after the state socialist system was gone, the new hungarian ruling class thought of eu membership not just as a way to gain political stability but also to attract foreign capital and promote economic growth (barnes & randerson, 2007). this strategy to ‘import’ stability and growth through eu, and possibly emu, membership is actually similar to italian attempts of overcoming a domestic deadlock of the political system through subordination to emu policy guidelines and irish efforts to use the european single market as a springboard for fdi-led growth. such attempts failed in hungary as they failed in italy and ireland. in the early 2000s, hungary did achieve growth rates of gdp and capital formation that were significantly higher than the respective rates in core countries of the eu (see table 1). thus, it seemed as if hungary, along with some other eastern european countries, had taken the road towards european integration and catch-up growth as successfully as ireland had done two decades earlier. however, the period of high growth was short and followed a sharp and prolonged downturn in the 1990s. moreover, the integration of hungary into the capitalist world market went hand in hand with massive imports. hungary’s new rich were keen on western luxuries to demonstrate their new status, and capital formation on the ruins of the former state socialist economy created a market for western makers of investment goods. as a result, hungary’s current account was deep in the red until 2008, when the combined effects of imf-intervention (imf 2010), which the government called for in november 2008, and recession led to import reductions that were significantly higher than the crisis-triggered decrease of exports (see table 2). another reason for the improvement of hungary’s current account position was the return to currency devaluations. the forint had massively depreciated against the euro and its predecessor-currencies during the 1990s and could be stabilized in the earlyand mid-2000s when hungary’s rulers were hoping to move from eu membership, which they achieved along with nine other eastern european countries in 2004, to the introduction to the euro. the current crisis dashed such hopes. at this point, the hungarian government is busy enough to deal with imf policies and may actually be quite happy that it doesn’t also have to deal with emu policy advice. failure to join the emu and catch up with the per-capita incomes of eu core countries are not the only disappointments for hungary’s rulers and ordinary 81 citizens. measures taken to achieve these goals have led to the country’s domination by western corporations and international organizations like the imf and the eu. there was just a short moment of independence between the collapse of the soviet empire and hungary’s integration into the western empire of capital as a subordinate state and peripheral economy. greece: weak economy in a strategic location greece didn’t experience a phase of accelerated growth since the 1980s like some other countries of the european peripheries. its growth pattern is more like that of core countries with a strong post-war boom, a growth slowdown in the 1970s and 1980s and a limited resurgence of growth in the 1990s and 2000s (maniatis, 2005). consumer spending that used up household savings drove this resurgence—the savings rate deteriorated from 3.9 in 1996/2000 to -5.8 in 2001/5 (see also table 3)—and was increasingly dependent on credit financing. because of a lack of domestic funding sources and production, consumption-driven growth was accompanied by increasing foreign debt and extraordinarily high current account deficits (see table 2). thus, greece showed all symptoms of a peripheral country whose hopes for prosperity are long gone. yet, this macroeconomic picture should not conceal greek’s strategic importance for european and other core countries of world capitalism. during the cold war, greece served as nato-outpost on the balkans and today it balances turkish influence in the middle east. though the latter is also a nato member because of its strategic location on the borders of the soviet union, now georgia, and oil-rich iran and iraq, western governments see turkey with suspicion because of its mostly muslim population. greece’s strategic role partly explains continuing public deficits and current account deficits: relative to gdp, greece spends more than double the amount of money on the military than the nato average, which includes the chief-military spender us (kollias & rafailidis, 2003). moreover, greece shipping companies operate the largest merchandise fleet of any eu member by far (unctad 2007). they own and control 40% of eu’s and 15% of the world’s carrying capacity and contribute around 8% to the greek gdp. control over merchandise trade has become increasingly important since world market integration and international supply chains became key ingredients of neoliberal capitalism. the media campaign that accompanied speculation against greece’s sovereign debt in the spring of 2010, presented the country as one that is run by spend-thrifty and corrupt governments who faked deficit and debt figures to sneak into the emu without actually matching its macroeconomic accession criteria. corruption is certainly not a privilege of governments in athens and the faking of economic data has been an integral part of high-flying stock markets in the centres of world capitalism before the crisis revealed the poor performance behind much fancy-fake data. european capitalism: varieties of crisis 82 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research what media commentators fail to mention is that eu core countries were eager to get greece on board the emu to underscore the country’s strategic position and get some level of control over its merchandise fleet. so important were these goals that even germany’s chief monetarists didn’t ask too many questions when they approved greece’s emu membership. of course, these days the germans happily use the chance to use speculative attacks against greece as a pretext to reinvent austerity as the sole means to overcome economic crisis. conclusions some conclusions can be drawn from the ‘mini case studies’ above. the first one is that macroeconomic imbalances within the emu, and the eu more generally, are largely caused by germany’s efforts to spur exports and growth through wage restraint and other anti-inflationary policies. the downside of these export-boosting measures is that they limit domestic demand so that export-growth didn’t translate into growth of overall-gdp but into increasing current account surpluses. this was only possible because demand growth in other countries was high enough to absorb german export surpluses without their governments turning towards protectionist measures to reign in their current account deficits. this group of foreign deficit countries includes not only peripheral countries like greece, hungary and ireland but also the eu core countries britain and france. the difference between core and periphery is not that the former are, with regards to their current accounts, surplus countries and the latter are deficit countries; the difference is that, in times of economic crisis, core countries have the power to intervene politically, either directly or through international organizations like the eu or the imf, in the periphery. this is the reason why crisis-management in high-deficit countries like britain and the us is left to the respective ruling and political classes of these countries, whereas peripheral countries with similar or even lower deficits are either faced with direct euor imf-intervention, for example greece and hungary, or are threatened with such interventions if their governments shy away from pre-emptive austerity policies like the ones adopted by ireland during the 2008/9 crisis. the second conclusion is that the integration of peripheral countries into international supply chains and world markets did not allow them to gain the same strength that germany could acquire through the making of its export economy during the post-war prosperity. the build-up of additional capacities for export production can contribute, in a world economy that is already plagued with overcapacities, to short-lived investment booms like the ones ireland and hungary experienced. but this neither helped their economies to gain any significant share in world markets nor their states to climb up in the international hierarchy of states. 83 the significant share of construction in ireland’s investment boom—one of the reasons why the irish boom lasted longer than the one in hungary—leads to the third conclusion that can be drawn from the case studies above. ever larger overcapacities can only be avoided if consumer demand keeps up with increasing production capacities. housing construction, concomitant surges of house prices and the expansion of consumer credit based on rising property values have been key for the growth of consumer demand over the last two decades. the us, though most prominent for its housing bubble and subprime crisis, was not the only country witnessing such housing-speculation and debt-driven increases in consumer demand. the same is true for britain, ireland, spain and japan. to be sure, the financial instruments used to prop up house prices and consumer-demand are largely ‘made on wall street’. the city of london was crucial in making them available to european countries including those of the euro-zone. far from representing an alternative to the unregulated and speculative world of the dollar wall street regime (schmidt 2009a), emu is well integrated into the us-dominated system of world finance. without the bubble economies in the us, britain and a number of peripheral economies, german export success would have been impossible. monetarist economists are right, and surprisingly close to many of their keynesian counterparts, when they point at the instability that such bubbles produce. yet, this was the way neoliberal capitalism solved the problem of insufficient demand after a decade of crises in the 1970s—until another ‘great crisis’ hit the world in 2008 (schmidt 2009b). references andor, l. (2000). hungary on the road to the european union: transition in blue. westport: praeger. barnes, i; randerson, c. (2007): eu expansion and the political economy of former communist states’ accession: the case of hungary’s ‘convergence’. capital and class, vol. 93, 179-197. bonacich, e.; wilson, j. (2008): getting the goods – ports, labor, and the logistics revolution. ithaca, london: cornell university press. european central bank (2010): monthly bulletin, june 2010, frankfurt. european commission (2009): economic crisis in europe: causes. consequences and responses. european economy 7/2009, brussels. european commission (2010): intra-euro-area competitiveness and imbalances. european economy 1/2010, brussels. european capitalism: varieties of crisis 84 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research goldstein, a. (1998): recent works on italian capitalism: a review essay. journal of modern italian studies, vol. 3, 175-184. gowan, p. (1999): the global gamble – washington’s faustian bid for world dominance. london, new york: verso. gowam, p. (2009): crisis in the heartland – consequences of the new wall street system. new left review, jan-feb 2009, 5-29. green, d.; petrick, k. (1999): the eastward expansion of the european union and the transformation of the financial system. review of radical political economics, vol. 31, 78-90. international monetary fund (2009): ireland: 2009 article iv consultation, imf country report no. 09/195, washington. international monetary fund (2010): hungary: fifth review under the stand-by arrangement, imf country report no. 10/80, washington. kanda, d. (2010): asset booms and structural fiscal positions: the case of ireland. imf working paper, washington. kirby, p. (2004): development theory and the celctic tiger. european journal of development research, vol. 16, 301-328. kitson, m.; michie, j. (1996): britain’s industrial performance since 1960: underinvestment and relative decline. economic journal, vol. 106, 196-212. kollias, c.; rafailidis, a. (2003): a survey of the greek defence industry. defence and peace economics, vol. 14, 311-324. lapavitsas, c. et al. (2010): eurozone crisis: beggar thyself and thy neighbour, research on money and finance, occasional report, march 2010, london. lombard, m. (1995). a re-examination of the reasons for the failure of keynesian expansionary policies in france, 1981-1983. cambridge journal of economics, vol. 19, 359-372. maniatis, t. (2005): marxian macroeconomic categories in the greek economy. review of radical political economics, vol. 37, 494-516. moschovis, g.; servera, m. (2009): external imbalances of the greek economy: the role of fiscal and structural policies. ecfin country focus, vol. vi, issue 6. o’hearn, d. (2001): the atlantic economy: britain, the us, and ireland. manchester: manchester university press. parsons, craig (2003). a certain kind of europe. ithaca, london: cornell university press. piore, m. j.; sabel. c. f. (1984): the second industrial divide: possibilities for prosperity. new york: basic books. 85 radice, h. k. (1995). britain in the world economy: national decline, capital success? in: david coates and john hillard (eds.): uk economic decline. englewood cliffs: prentice hall, 233249. schmidt, i. (2007): atlantic capitalism – one world or more? state of nature – online journal on radical ideas, autumn 2007, http://www.stateofnature.org/atlanticcapitalism.html. schmidt, i. (2009a): new institutions, old ideas: the passing moment of the european social model. studies in political economy, vol. 84, 7-28. schmidt, i. (2009b): große krisen seit den 1930er jahren. prokla – zeitschrift für kritische sozialwissenschaft, vol. 157, 523-540. united nations conference on trade and development (2007): review of maritime transport 2007, geneva. european capitalism: varieties of crisis 86 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research 87 social mobility: current thrusts (and non-thrusts) a critical approach to the analysis of mobility jan mayer "...the most important thing. ..that we can know about a man is what he takes for granted, and the most elemental and important facts about a society are those that are seldom debated and generally regarded as settled." (louis v.'irth, preface to karl mannheim's ideology and utopia, 1936, xxii, cited in pease, form and rytina, 1970: 127) in the sections which follow, various aspects of mobility research will be examined, beginning in section ii with a orief summary of various approaches which have been taken. the discussion of the sources and functions of social mooility in industrial societies leads to a discussion of the relationship between mobility and industrialization trends, including changes in the occupational structure. the paper ends with a critique of some of the dominant assumptions and lacks of attention in mobility research. the title of the paper indicates a certain skepticism with regard to any progression to date towards shedding light on the "taken for grantedness" of the mobility researcher's world, which encourages a narrow focus on some elements to the exclusion of others. some reasons why this is so are suggested in the concluding section. i introduction: the meaning of mobility the theory of social mobility, goldhaner informs us in the international encyclopedia 0? the social sciences, attempts to account for the frequencies in movements of individuals, families and groups from one social position to another. as moore (1966: 19?) notes, such movements may he in terms of location, relative position, sector or industry, in terms of lateral or occupational moves, or in terms of employer. movements may be intra-generational (career mobility) or intergenerational (change from father's to offspring's status). clearly, some types of mobility will be of more importance than others when such questions as degrees of opportunity or social inequality are raised. the subject of social mobility is an element in the more general study of "social selection"--the distribution of people into positions in social structures, with positions in turn varying in terms of three major "scarce and desirable" social rewards: income (or material goods), prestige, and power. thus, there is a relationship between the stratification system of a society and mobility within it--an "open" class system produces a certain kind and degree of mobility distinct from more closed "estate" systems or nearly rigid caste systems. different mechanisms or processes 88 are said to operate in each type, and these types have a relationship to the type of society—agrarian or industrial, and within industrial, whether "market" (capitalist) or "command" (soviettype) systems. industrialism and its impact on the stratification system and implications for mobility will be examined in section iv. at this point, however, it is important to note a number of general features of social structures which determine forms mobility will take in different societies. smelser and lipset (1966: £-11) identify three such features: (1) "ascription" or "achievement" as the institutionalized basis of legitimation for movement, implying collective and individualistic bases respectively; (2) the degree to which differentiation in the kinship, religious, economic, and political institutions makes for differential status of individuals among the dimensions of wealth, power and prestige (a high degree of formal segregation existing in highly institutionally differentiated social structures making it easier for individuals to move on the basis of a single role); and (3) the locus of control of sanctions ( rewards) --and if in the hands of a few, the degree to which these concentrations coincide in various institutional orders. smelser and lipset (:2) also make the point that economic development (specifically, industrialization) requires more movement, or at least different forms of movement, and that the ease or difficulty of such moveients will depend on the social structure of that society—there is an "emerging tension" between the "demands" of the developing structure and the characteristics of traditional structures. social systems, in their view, have certain "directional tendencies" and certain resources, which are linked by social structure in terms of basic units: roles and social organization (clusters of roles). systems have "functional imperatives" which must be met if systems are to survive: the economic, political, and "integrative" (norms, values, culture) are basic. these imperatives are interrelated, both in terms of interdependence and also in terms of the way in which sanctions produced in one may be used or involved in complex interchanges in another context, to produce other sanctions (e.g. wealth transformed as power, or education as inforration) . thus the stratification system must be seen in terms of roles characterized by different (and differential) receipts of sanctions; roles, organizations, individuals or classes may oe seen as stratified on the basis of these distributions ( :2-7) . to the functionalist, stratification (and hence inequality) is both necessary and inevitable if efficiency and survival of the social system are to be assured. historical and empirical data have at least confirmed the ubiquitousness of stratification. parkin (1973: 49) states that "as a rough general estimate, between a quarter and a third of those born into tne manual working class in modern western countries will move into the ranks of the middle class."—and for most of these, as blau and duncan (ls>67) have found, mobility will involve only short-range changes, such as to low white-collar positions, with the less usual cases, parkin notes, becoming mobile by entry into middle-class professions. 89 mcroberts' (1975) survey of the literature shows that mobility, whether up or down, occurs in sin£le "steps" (i.e. to adjacent categories) ( :7) . lipset and zetterberg (1966: 566; first published 1956), using only the statistically crude comparative tools available at the time, concluded that most western industrial societies revealed roughly the sane "high" rate as the u.s., but perhaps it would be preferable to say "low" (for ooviously, what one regards as evidence of an acceptable rate of mobility will be a normative judgment). (rates of mobility, however, were not related to differences in income inequality^ these findings have been confirmed by more recent comparisons which show that there is little difference in mobility between countries at different levels of economic development, having different normative orientations or class structures (kcroberts, 1975: 7; from muller and kayer, 1973). as for the united states over time, for example, duncan (196?) concludes that the data to the 19oo's tell a "monotonously repetitive story"--no regular increases or decreases in the magnitudes of correlations to be expected if stratification were becoming less rigid since about world war i, that is. no trend either towards increasing or decreasing mobility ( :711) . moreover, hlau an i duncan's (1967: 424) findings indicate that manual workers are less likely than others to achieve an occupational status different from that of their fathers. they identify the three major class divisions in terms of manual/non-raanual and blue-collar/farm as manifested in intergenerational and intragenerational mobility matrices; the lowest white-collar and lowest blue-coliar categories, located just above the class boundaries, apparently serve as channels for upward mobility, while self-employed groups are largely "self-contained" (:422). ii approaches to the study of mobility perhaps the most striking aspect of mobility research over the decades is how little it has progressed. duncan, as cited in the introductory section, concluded that the results of his research were "monotonously repetitive" ; the same could be said about mobility research in general. research has been dominated by the questions "v.'hat factors affect mobility?" and "how 'open' a society is this?" (or more often, "v.'hat is the rate of mobility?"). some different kinds of questions have recently been raised, but as will be shovm in the concluding section, even these have fallen short of the mark in terms of a contriuution to a more encompassing understanding of the mechanisms, consequences, and structural causal roots of lack of mobility, the other side of the coin which comes closer to the heart of questions of inequality, "relative deprivation," and the like. goldhamer highlights one objection to the mobility-measurement enterprise: "...moral and political critiques of society must rest not on distributions of children's status by parents' status., but on the nature of the processes that produce these distributions." (inter! atiokal encyclopedia..; :430) 90 obviously, such questions are not contained within the limits of statistical inference—they r.ust be placed there through theory which guides data-gathering and interpretation, and what is included in theory as relevant depends upon the researcher's bias and the bias of the dominant mode of thinking he accepts. what is absent in the theory will not magically appear in the statistics. duncan (1962) dates the methodological emphasis on measurement from the 1940's with the publication of an article by sibley (1942). up to that time only cooley and sorokin had made some contribution to an understanding of mobility. but even sibley's work had no data on vertical mobility per se , only on net shifts in the occupational structure as presumed evidence for past mobility. sibley's focus was on structural factors—demography, in terms of immigration and differential fertility, and on the educational system as a mechanism facilitating selection of talent and merit. between that time and about 1952, most writers were concerned with the "rigidification" thesis--that the opportunity structure of america had rigidified or that people had "lost the belief" in the possibility of mobility. it was not until natalie kogoff's 1953 study, with its "methodological elegance," that any significant data was brought forward, according to duncan; her finding was that there had been no significant changes in mobility rates between 1910 and 1940. mcroberts (1975: 2-6) defines three main approaches to the study of mobility. these are all approaches at the "macro," societal level, as distinguished from much rarer "micro" approaches such as that of harrison white in chains of offohtui.'ity (1970), in which a mathematically sophisticated "systems" analysis is applied to the mechanisms of mobility within organizational settings involving populations within them. all three "macro" models, the "matrix," "status-attainment," and "life-history" approaches, are essentially mathematical models, relating variables together and searching out statistical associations. the. earlier approach uses a matrix of father's occupation and son's current occupation (father's occupation represented at approximately mid-career by specifying his occupation at the point when the son was 16) ; the matrix describes the amount of mobility in a society intergenerationally. the status-attainment approach goes further. initially developed by blau and duncan (1967), the model introduces the variables of father's education, respondent's education, and respondent's first job on completion of education. it attempts to account for factors which contribute to the transformation of son's origin status into son's present status, but also allows for an examination of the relationship between educational attainment and status attainment independent of origin, through the statistical method of path analysis, which also allows the introduction of other factors thought to be relevant (mcroberts :2-6) . as duncan (1966: 681) explains it: 91 "the rigidity of stratification, in this sense l i.e. intertemporal predictability greater than chance] , is measured by the intergenerational correlation or coefficient of association. . .to be distinguished from the degree of inequality, which refers to the extent of differentiation on a relevant scale of rewards...". the analysis "places" the present generation on an occupational scale relative to placement of the father, but little more. aside from the limitations of the model, a number of methodological problems come to mind: first, the impact of structural change on occupational categories (this is addressed in section iv) ; second, the question of scaling of positions in terms of whether a "step" from one occupation to another always has the same significance (a point raised by goldhamer :430 and also by smelser and lipset, 1966: ib, particularly in terms of the autonomy and social relations connected with jobs) . the elau and duncan model appears to be able to deal with the first but not the second objection. the life-history approach (which kcroberts thinks of not as distinct from but as an extension of the status-attainment model) places its emphasis not so much on inter-generational movement but on the process of intra-generational (career mobility) movements and factors in the opportunity structure (1975: 7). as developed in the later work of hatalie rogoff (now ramsey) in the norwegian occupational life-history study (1974), the focus is on "the socio-economic life cycle of a cohort" and on the distances between groupings in terms not only of societal goods but "bads" (the distribution of negative rewards such as unemployment, illness, work discomforts, and factors usually labelled "quality of life"). ramsey questions "how effective the occupational system is as a transmitter of the rewards involved in the stratification system." (:14), noting that occupational status has been found to account for "relatively little of the variance in income in the united states." ( :15) . the norwegian study found it accounted for only 22$ of the variance in income (:1£). education and occupational status correlated .70 (slightly less than half of the variance), the highest correlation obtained (:19). ramsey also pointed to the possibility in there being a trend towards education bringing a lower monetary return than it did in the past (:22). although she did not raise the question, a relevant concern of research would seem to be the variance unaccounted for—what is there in the structure of industrial (specifically, capitalist) societies which perpetuates inequality and lack of mobility? ill sources and function s of mobility as mentioned in section i, sibley's (1942) analysis of mobility focussed on structural conditions, including the demographic "clues" of immigration, which aided mobility of native americans by injecting a large number of unskilled workers into the bottom end of the labour force, and fertility differentials between the 92 lower and higher occupational clas.-es, which created a surplus at the lower end who could r.ove up the social ladder to fill places left vacant there due to lower rates of reproduction. two other sources of upward mobility sibley identified were continuing technological progress, and the ability of the educational system to outfit people for positions of skill and responsilility. as sibley suspected immigration and differential fertility might eventually be "dwindling sources of upward mobility," he placed great erphasis on the educational system rather than on the effects of technology for upgrading the labour force, since he also noted the appearance of the offsetting effects of unemployment. he saw the future of technological progress as depending on the "ability of the nation's leaders to readjust political-economic institutions so as to produce a genuine 'economy of plenty.'" ( :32 5 ) , thus preventing political unrest and polarization into distinct classes. an important mechanism of stratification is intergenerational transmission of status including not only those parental statuses which influence offsprings' opportunities and orientations, such as parental occupational status ana educational attainment, but also, as duncan (l$t>8: 683) points out, such ascribed statuses as racial, ethnic, cultural, or religious group membership. other factors which affect nobility are inheritance of property, wealth or "intangibles," genetics, socialization, access to opportunities, advantages or handicaps of environment, and something which duncan calls "differential association," which includes items such as assortive mating, which place constraints on the socialization field or act as limits on access to opportunity ( :685) . causes of mobility identified in the literature may be divided into two types—those whicn are structural in nature such as demographic factors and occupational structure as related to industrial development, the creation of vacancies; and those which are "individual" in nature: genetic (intelligence, native ability) conditioned by environment, education, training, motivational factors (aspirations to achieve and to oe mobile), and variational (cultural orientations and belief in mobility as a good end) (see lipset and bendix, 1959; goldhamer; lipset and zetterberg, 1966; blau and duncan, 1967). it can be argued that much of the latter concern constitutes an "individualistic bias" in the literature, inasmuch as it places a great deal of responsibility for success or failure on tne individual rather than on social conditions (as, for example, lipset and bendix' s 1959: 286-7 statement that "the cumulation of disadvantages at th» bottom of the social scale is in large part the result of a lack of interest in educational and occupational achievenents" which cannot be attributed solely to the environment but to individuals' defence mechanisms against psychological burdens of mobility) . by focussing undue attention only on the characteristics of mobile versus non-mobile individuals qua individuals, attention is drawn away from characteristics of social structures and of social groupinrs relative to one another--that is, from the relationship between existing social arrangements and social classes, in the v/eberian and marxian senses. 93 smelser and lipset (1966) argue that "status values"—a "strong concern for social mobility in a society"—will contribute to economic growth because those desiring mobility success "will seek ways to maximize resources" ( :2u). their distinction, cited earlier, between ascriptionand achievement-oriented societies is important here—in societies where enphasis is on ascribed status of people based on kin groupings, "particularistic" rather than "universalistic" standards will tend to prevail, and so impede the workings of meritocratic principles to seek out and elevate talent--principles which are applicable to individuals and not to like groupings. thus, according to these theorists, "this phenomenon of increasing individual nobility appears to be one of the universal consequences of industrialization" ( :12) . blau and duncan (1967: 430) also express a belief that "expanding universalism" (the prevailing of objective criteria of evaluation of individuals over particularistic and subjective bases of evaluations) are causes of mobility, since such criteria become tied to a concern of individuals with materialistic values and hence to an interest in achievement and efficiency. for technological progress and efficiency to continue, the social system has to be such that "the great potential of society's human resources can be more fully exploited in a fluid class structure with a high degree of mobility" ( :43d . hence class lines which restrict mobility are a waste of human talent. the assertion of the democratizing and politically stabilizing effects of industrialization and hence mobility has been expressed by many writers, among them blau and duncan (1967: 439), and also by lipset and bendix (1959) , although the latter also remark that it is a strong belief in mobility, aside from the actual rate, which has the stabilizing influence (:260). lipset and zetterberg (1966: 571) observe that it is strains introduced by thwarted mobility aspirations which predispose individuals towards more extreme political views. they see a consequence of economic development being a potential tension in contradictions between the aristocratic and egalitarian sentiments, where egalitarianism is a characteristic of mature industrial societies. the functions of mobility are also taken up by lipset and bendix (1959: 260-265) in connection with the impact of rapid industrialization creating structural instabilities and disrupting orderly political processes through such factors as conflicts between individual aspirations and kin loyalties, or between emphasis on personal achievement and the management of failure; they speak of the "social and psychic costs" of high rates of mobility. this concern is also expressed by tumin (1970), who views the enphasis of mass societies on mobility strivings and the success ethic as creating: (1) fragmentation of the social order into statuscompeting groups each striving to emulate higher groups and shut out lower ones, (2) a move away from the belief in the dignity of work and work for its own sake to a cynical instrumental use of work as a means to the ends of social and financial success, and (3) a "cult of gratitude" among those who are mobile, blunting social criticism and reinforcing an acceptance of the ''status quo" ( :335-33#) • tumin's overriding concern, however, does not appear to be for individuals or for social classes, but rather for social 9* stability and cohesion of society. tumin's functionalist (and conservative) concern for the social system makes of individuals merely means for the ends of "system needs," it would seem. although blau and duncan (1967: 40?) identified social origins, career preparation, and first job as important conditions for occupational success, they also argued that it is the "basic structural features" of industrial society which are the source of high rates of occupational nobility, and expressed a faith that technological progress would continue to improve chances for upward mobility by making possible the shift from primary and secondary to tertiary industry (especially in professional and semi-professional services) , thus expanding the occupations at the top of the hierarchy, contracting the bottom, and acting as a vehicle for upward mobility ( :426-429) . this is the thesis of the general upgrading of the labour force which many writers have seen as basic to the process of industrialization, and these remarks will thus serve as a suitable introduction to the critical issues raised in the next section. iv industrialization. social structure. amd mobility the assertion of the occupational upgrading of the labour force as a result of advanced industrialism^ and the assertion of the increasing homogenization of class groupings arise from two kinds of social structural analysis which are closely related: the "logic of industrialism" model as exemplified by clark kerr (see goldthorpe, 1966: 649; see ossowski's statement cited in lipset and bendix, 19^9: 281), and the "post-industrial society" thesis as exemplified by daniel bell (see rinehart, 1975: 83-88). both of these approaches have been much criticized for their lack of accord with empirical facts, and they will not be dealt with here. however, they both share the "upgrading" thesis in common and it is this aspect which has important implications for mobility theory. although goldthorpe (1966: 651-3) agrees that in general, industrial societies appear to have higher rates of mobility than non-industrial societies, it does not follow that industrial society is in essence "open" or "meritocratic" or that high rates of mobility are inevitable consequences of technology, increasing specialization and the need for talent expressed in the division of labour. he cites two sources of counter-argument: after kolko and myrdal, goldthorpe argues that levelling in some ranges of the income distribution (as, for example, a swelling of the middle ranks) does not mean more equality, since other trends may be operating—the gap between top and bottom may have remained the same or have widened (indeed there is evidence that in some nations, this latter appears to be the case). moreover, goldthorpe points out, increased inter-generational mobility as indicated by the data may be associated with an actual limitation on intra-gene rational, or career, mobility. lipset and zetterberg (1966: 567) argue that the expansion in whitecollar positions at the expense of manual creates a "surge of upward occupational mobility to the extent that new industrial labour is 95 drawn from farm areas." although they cite a study by bendix which shows a parallel trend in a number of western industrial countries towards an increase in adninistrative employees per 100 production workers since the beginning of this century, they give no evidence to support the argunent that i_n general whitecollar work represents upgrading, or that a move from farm work to industrial manual work represents upward mobility. far from representing upgrading, rinehart {1975: 86) argues that the swelling of white-collar ranks has not occurred at the expense of manual work but at the expense of farm, and that in 1971 the over-whelming majority of white-collar workers (six out of ten in clerical and sales) were engaged in low-level white-collar work, and that within the category "professional and technical," 70$ were semi-professional or technical workers not involved in the complex and challenging "knowledge-work" attributed to them by post-industrial society theorists. moreover, he indicates there is evidence that people are becoming over-educated for their jobs (:#7). an extended argument is made by braverman (1974) for the increasing "deskilling" of much work which previously demanded higher amounts of skill and thought, through the process of subdivision of tasks and the separation of conceptualization from execution of tasks, with control of conceptualization and execution in the hands of high-ranking members of hierarchies or their agents. thus, in effect, much of what may appear to resemble mobility from blue-collar to low-level white-collar and the proliferation of low-level technicians is in actuality a process of "proletarianization" of increasing proportions of the labour force. these arguments would point to a form of downward mobility as more blockages are introduced into the occupational structure, or at minimum, that relative position in terms of class distribution has remained the same despite changes in the nature of work. despite the fond hopes of some of the structural theorists cited here, attempts at measuring structural (occupational) trends also lend support to the interp retation that the progression of industrialism has not resulted in increased mobility—as for example is shown by natalie rogoff's 1953 finding that when changes in the occupational structure were "standardized out", a major factor in mobility changes between 1910 and 1940 was accounted for (cited in koore, 19o6: 1^0). although moore recognizes that skill dilution rather than upgrading is a possibility of structural change ( :197) and that it is not clear why seme white-collar occupations are termed "head" work (such as typists) while some bluecollar' jobs are "hand" work (such as linotypists) (:206), he argues that "it is generally true that occupations commonly classified as non-manual require somewhat higher educational levels and... yield higher incomes." ( :206) . the question of certification through education will be addressed shortly. arguments for upgrading (and hence, sources of mobility) tend to take on a curiously circular cast. occupations which require more education often do so as a result of decisions by employers and may have nothing to do with job content. a listing of occupations in some kind of rank-order says little about differences in authority or job-content between two adjacent categories and may in fact be 96 a reflection of other factors, such as income differentials which may be the result of unionization or its absence. status rankings on which objective rankings are in part based have experienced little change in consensus over the years or from country to country because they are part of the dominant definition of reality. the last point refers to parkin's insight that through socialization into or by dominant-class ideologies, people learn not the placement of every occupation in the scale but rather, "the criteria by which positions are to be ranked. . .certain criteria become institutionalized as 'relevant' fcr ranking purposes, while other criteria are excluded or defined as 'irrelevant'." so that technical expertise, skill, or responsibility are accepted by subordinate classes as relevant fur high prestige, and not physical effort, danger, or dirtiness (1973: 42). if the assertion of occupational upgrading is based upon upgrading in status, and status is a subjective dimension, then a serious point of confusion is introduced into what is purported to be an attempt to measure objective phenomena. since blau and duncan's task was to measure the extent to which a man's occupational achievements depended on occupational status of his father, the question of occupational changes was a crucial one. the issue, as duncan sees it, is "whether occupational status... is sufficiently stable over time as to permit meaningful intertemporal comparisons..." (196?: 70}). duncan's "strong presumptive evidence" of stability was based on income positions and on prestige rankings, and he concluded that the occupational status structure is subject to such snail "random shocks" that changes cumulatevery slowly and have thus not affected the statistics to an appreciable degree ( :709) . it could be argued equally as well, following parkin, that after all, there has been no major overturning of the criteria by which the dominant view accords status, and no major questioning of its legitimacy. the question of whether or not an occupational structure has been "upgraded" cannot be answered by reference to a scale but involves other criteria and other kinds of observations. if upgrading cannot be shown, then one is left only with data which indicates there has at best been no change in the occupational structure, however much it may have changed in other ways, to make any difference to mobility. before proceeding to some general critical comments, it will be in order to discuss one other aspect of the industrialization arguments which pertains to what night be described as "the myth of increasing rationality" and "the myth of increasing universalism." since a highly sophisticated industrial society needs efficiency and rational means for allocating ability, so blau and duncan's argument went, "objective criteria of evaluation that are universally accepted increasingly pervade all spheres of life and displace particularistic standards of diverse ingroups, intuitive judgments, and humanistic values not susceptible to empirical verification." (1967: 429). however, in "strategies of social closure in class formation," parkin (1974) puts forward a different interpretation of the use of universalistic criteria. he distinguishes between two historically distinct ways in which dominant groups exclude others 97 from claims to social rewards: "classes of nomination" are the product of rules of exclusion "that single out the specific attributes of individuals rather than the generalized attributes of social collectivities" (:o) which are the historically older "classes of reproduction." he points out that individualistic rules of exclusion operate within societies dominated by the "liberal ideal." the establishing of universal criteria for evaluating individuals in the form of "credent ialism" is a way of controlling entry to valued positions to those qualified, using eeemingly impersonal means, but universalism is distorted when the "means of credentialism" are monopolized by one social group, and by the transmission of "cultural capital" which introduce "socially inherited handicaps and easements" that are de facto types of collectivist exclusion ana class reproduction ( :7-8) . certain desired social qualities (that is, desired by groups in control of occupational recruitment and selection) come to be more predominant in some groups than others—the nebulous quality of "character" is one such that is sufficiently loose to be used by dominant groups subject to their own definition. there are many such "intangibles"which go into the selection process of potential new elites, for example, by established elites, such that through the recruitment of people "like" tnemselves and through co-optation, existing social arrangements are perpetuated. v critiques of the kceility-measurement enterprise what follows is not a critique of measurement per se , but of the way it has been used, particularly its lack of including any other methods of data-collection. the attempt at making statistical connections usually begins or ends with a nod to social structure and accepts the dominant theories and assumptions about industrial societies as put forward by structuralists who are often functionalists in one guise or another. the fact remains that statistics do not tell a story in ther.selves—they are subject to interpretation and they are only as reliable as the operationalization of variables that went into them. the selection of variables in turn is only-as good as the theory behind them. a number of reasons will be suggested for why this theory may be found lacking. the study of mobility over the years has been largely an enterprise based on variations of the same themes; it has utilized mathematical models of increasing sophistication which have nevertheless been premised on an oversimplified view of the social system, one aspect of which they purport to account for. their variables have been few, their assumptions lacking in tneoretical inclusiveness—many have fallen easily into the "individualistic" trap and have hence been overly psychologistic in their explanations of the sources and mechanisms of mobility; many, often the same, have also fallen into the "logic of industrialism" trap. it is perhaps no accident that the two types of explanation are not unrelated in their minds: that is, the belief in the overriding effect of meritocratic and universalistic principles operating impersonally in the selection system means that the burden of responsibility for mobility is upon the indiviuual, and that if there are any 98 imperfections in the system, "tinkering" with the system to increase equality of opportunity will make the race more fairly run. duncan (196?: 6£>) notes that "from a normative standpoint" one could be concerned with whether the race is fairly run, given the rules, or whether changes should be made in the rules— but the problem with mobility studies is that they rarely get around to explicating the implications of their findings in even the first instance, let alone the second. although some studies (particularly the work of blau and duncan) have noted the differential rates of mobility between the two broad occupational (and societal) groupings centering around the manual/nonmanual "divide," to my knowledge few if any have spent much time on intra-group differences, and none has related these differential rates to dominant class-configurations in society: that is between different categories of manual or of white-collar workers and their differing relationship to the dominant value and resource centres of the society. the one exception is that of elite studies, which have made exhaustive analyses of social origins, career patterns, and mechanisms of exclusion and cohesion which mark off elites from non-elites—but the studies have not been linked to the mainstream of mobility research. it would appear from this lack of connection that the reality of the elite world is not thought to have repercussions for the non-elite world in terms of opportunity structure at lower points on the ladder, in terms of the locus of control and power, and the basis of elite dominance. this is particularly curious considering the concern expressed by elite researchers about the economic and institutional consequences of concentration of power. the notion of dominant and subordinate classes and of the property system around which their relations revolve in capitalist societies have been conspicuously absent in the mobility theoristresearchers' kit of concepts and explanations. it appears not to occur to them that, as parkin (1973: ch. 2) sees it, some degree of mobility in capitalist societies not only assures the infusion of talent when needed but also serves to legitimate the existing set of relations by reinforcing the belief in the rise of merit regardless of origins. both parkin (1973: ch. 1) and anderson (1974: 121-122) criticize the use of the "multidimensional" framework for the analysis of social class common not only to stratification theorists in general, but to those cited here. v/hen wealth, status and power are treated as separate variables with little relationship to one another, or at least, with some disjunctions, attention is drawn away from what is the major societal underpinning in capitalist systems: control of productive property. anderson argues that property classes or ownership must occupy the first and central part of any theory of stratification, as was held by marx and weber, and that from the fact of property other dimensions of stratification can then be examined in proper context. he goes beyond parkin's view that the occupational order is the "backbone" of the class structure and reward system in modern western societies, stating that occupation has always been an important and usually only source of sustenance for the masses; 99 the shift from self-employment to salaried employment is due not to the demise but to the "increasing preponderanc e of property in shaping industrial society" (:122; his err.phasist^ anderson also argues that what is at issue is not the operation of the mobility system but "why such a stepladder society exists in the first place and how and why it is perpetuated." ( :140) . mobility researchers have been obsessed with establishing the rate of mobility, and with the existence of stratification systems almost (if not completely) universally as an important fact—but one may ask whether it is the fact of stratification which is the important concern of research once the fact is established, or whether it ought to be the basis of stratification, its underpinnings, and its meaning. this venture has not gone far enough, and the reason it has not within "mainstream" sociology a; pears due to the limitations imposed by theory and behind that, of an ideological inclination which impedes it. strauss (1971: 1) has concluded that sociological theory is "shot through with rhetoric and ideological commitment"—he has found from an analysis of clusters of images in american stratification literature that the dominant themes of the frontiers as "seedbeds of democracy," the honest workman, the "rugged individualist," the emphasis on personal character, "destiny and civilization" and the "just rewards" of social mobility contained in social theories about industrialization "reflect and are virtually inseparable from their views about social mobility." (:10>). the conviction that americfn stratification literature has been dominated by notions of "evolutionary liberalism" and functionalism has also been expressed by pease, form and rytina (1v70). they trace dominant themes and assumptions in the research to the present, and find that in the postwar period, despite the critique of functionalism and the discovery of some merit in the theories particularly of weber (and to a lesser extent marx), only a perfunctory nod has been made in their direction. social mobility researchers have trivialized weber's work by separating out status from its theoretical brothers; by the 19>0's interest evolved into a concern for "mass middle-class society" with consumption patterns of more importance than income patterns. the authors give three reasons why stratification research seems to have steered clear of hard-hitting issues: the dominant american ideology of individualism which has seeped into sociological theory despite the sociological perspective on "social" explanations for phenomena; the public ideology which conceives of any theoretical debt to i-.arx as implying marxism ; and the struggle of sociology to achieve scientific status, hence its emphasis on improving quantification procedures and choosing variables like status which are easier to operationalize than power (: 132-133). in summary, the sociological enterprise as it is represented in the vast majority of north american stratification and mobility 100 studies is aptly characterized by pease, form and rytina thus: "sociologists who view stratification as a matter of individual occurrences rather than social structure, who study consumption to the neglect of distribution and production, who study the labor market but not the credit and commodity markets, who emphasize status, oversimplify class, neglect wealth, define power as being outside stratification, and who fail to see 'race relations,' minority status, and poverty in the context of stratification confirm robert lynd's observation that when it ccmes to matters of class stratification, 'the social sciences tiptoe evasively around the problem' ." ( :134) . 101 bibli ography anderson, charles h., the political economy of social class, 1974 englewood cliffs, n.j.: prentice-hall blau, peter h. , duncan, otis dudley, the american occupational 1967 structure, new york: john v/iley &. sons brave rman, harry, labor and monopoly capital, new york and london: 1974 monthly review press duncan, otis dudley, "problems in the measurement of trend," in 1968 e. b. sheldon and w. e. moore (eds.), indicators of social change, new york: russell sage foundation goldhamer, herbert, "social mobility," international encyclopedia of the social sciences goldthorpe, john h., "social stratification in industrial society," 1966 in reinhard bendix and seymour martin lipset (eds.) class, status and fower, new york: the free press lipset, seymour martin; bendix, reinhard, social mobility in 1959 industrial society, berkeley and los angeles: university of california press lipset, seymour martin; zetterberg, hans l., "a theory of social 1966 mobility," in bendix and lipset (eds.) class, status and pov.'er, new york: the free press mcroberts, hugh a., social stratification in canada: a prelimin1975 ary analysis, doctoral dissertation, carleton university moore, wilbert e., "changes in occupational structures," in smelser 1966 and lipset, (eds.) social structure and mobility in economic development, chicago: aldine parkin, frank, "strategies of social closure in class formation," 1974 in parkin (ed,), the social analysis of class structure, london: tavistock , class inequality and political order, paladin (u.k.) t973 pease, john; form, william h.; rytina, joan huber, "ideological 1970 currents in american stratification literature," the american sociologist (may), pp. 127-137 ramsey, natalie rogoff, "social equality in the here and now," 1974 institute of applied social research, oslo raimeo rinehart, james w., the tyranny of work, don mills: longman canada 1975 102 sibley, elbridge, "some demographic clues to stratification," 1942 american sociological review, vol. 7, pp. 322-330 smelser, neil j.; lipset, seymour kartin, "social structure, 1966 mobility and development," in smelser and lipset (eds.), social structure and mobility in economic development, chicago; aldine strauss, anselra, the contexts of social mobility, chicago: 1971 aldine tuilin, melvin m. , "some unapplauded consequences of social mobility 1970 in a mass society," in tumin (ed.), readings on social stratification, englewood cliffs, n.j.: prentice-hall digitized by the internet archive in 2011 with funding from carleton university, department of sociology & anthropology http://www.archive.org/details/alternateroutesj09alte alternate routes presentation and editorial policy alternate routes is a ref ereed mul ti-disciplinary journal published annually by graduate students in the department of sociology and anthropology at carleton university in ottawa. we hope to make ar a forum for debate and exchange among graduate students throughout the country and are therefore interested in receiving papers written by graduate students (or co-authored with faculty), regardless of their university affiliation. the editorial emphasis is on the publication of critical and provocative analysis of theoretical and substantive issues which clearly have relevance for progressive political intervention. although we welcome papers on a broad range of topics, members of the editorial board work within a feminist and/or marxist tradition. therefore, we encourage submissions which advance or challenge questions and issues raised by these two broadly defined perspectives. we also welcome responses to and reviews of recent publications . alternate routes a journal of critical social research editorial collective: behnam behnia, veronica vazquez garcia, cristina gheorghe, david hubka , paul label le, brigitte malenfant, valerie norlen, paul shreenan, edith smith, barbara sussenberger . the editors gratefully acknowledge the financial assistance of the carleton university community: the department of sociology and anthropology and its chairperson, stephen richer; the dean of graduate studies and research, j.w. apsimon; the dean of social sciences, marilyn marshall. we also thank all the anonymous reviewers and mary-anne kandrack. subscriptions (1 year) students and unemployed $10.00 regular $12.00 foreign $12.00 (u.s.) institutions $18.00 foreign $18.00 (u.s.) make cheques payable to: alternate routes department of sociology and anthropology carleton university ottawa, ontario k1s 5b6 alternate routes is printed by 1 ' imprimerie gauvin in hull contents contributors and introduction v gramsci , women and the state veronica vazquez garcia 1 public broadcasting in canada: subordinate service david skinner 2 6 on the devaluation of women's labour: hegemonic and local ideological practices paul shreenan 44 historical materialism by cross-sectional survey design: the limits of e.o. wright's study of class structure david hubka 64 book reviews parker, r.g. bodies, pleasures and passions : sexual culture in contemporary brazil, boston: beacon press, 1991. (michel turcotte) 78 aronowitz, stanlezy & henry a. giroux. postmodern education: politics , culture and social criticism, minneapolis, minnesota: university of minnesota press, 1991. (george a. fogarasi ) 80 research notes la folie au declin du moyen-age paul label le 82 studying psychotherapeutic knowledge: notes toward a working definition of ideology mary-anne kandrack 90 contributors and introduction the cultural studies approach was imported to canada through the birmingham school and more recently has been enriched by scholarship coming from france and the united states. today the approach is even broader than the sum of these international traditions because canadians have brought to cultural studies a unique historical perspective. this new generation of canadian trained social scientists cut their teeth in english canadian political economy. what results are syntheses of these two very different approaches. class, along with gender and ethnicity remain important shapers of the lives of people and bring a richer and deeper understanding of canadian social reality. the articles in this issue are representative of the breadth of interests that contribute to our knowledge of canadian social practices and institutions. the uniqueness of the canadian historical experience is evident in the papers included in this volume. veronica vazquez garcia is a graduate student at the department of sociology and anthropology at carleton university, ottawa. her research focuses on the impact of cattle and oil industries on nahua communities in veracruz, southeastern mexico. her article in this issue explores the potential contribution that the marxism of antonio gramsci , and in particular his concepts of ideology, hegemony, civil society and the state can make to the neo-marxist current within feminist theory. the exploration of these concepts is located in the context of the absence of concepts of the sexual division of labour and of women's oppression in gramsci 's work. the paper concludes that gramsci's innovative theoretical and political contributions can be reformulated to deal with the contemporary concerns of socialist feminism. david skinner is a graduate student at the department of communications at simon fraser university, british columbia. focusing on the historical relations between the state and private capital, his paper argues that broadcasting regulations in canada have generally subordinated the interests of public broadcasting to those of private capital since the advent of these regulations. paul shreenan is a graduate student at the department of sociology and anthropology at carleton university. his research is on the development of the maritime fhishermen's union with specific focus on the impact of acadian culture on the union in different sub-regions of the maritimes. his article in this issue addresses the invisibility and undervaluation of women's labour among small boat fishers in atlantic canada. his basic contribution is the discussion of the role played by what the author terms "the ideological practice of independence" in reproducing the subordination of women in fisher households. this local ideological practice articulates with liberal, capitalist and patriarchal practices to legitimate the oppression of women. david hubka is a graduate student at the department of sociology and anthropology at carleton university. his area of interest is the construction of canadian national identity through the media. in his paper in this issue, e.o. wright's project is reviewed with respect to history and class structure. it is argued that wright's treatment of historicity has been neglected within the debates generated by his project, and that, taken out of historical context, his conceptualization of class loses its explanatory power regarding marxist theoretical integration and emancipatory strategies. alternate formulations of marxist theory and method for understanding class and history and offered, as well as directions for future research. we hope that our readers will respond to this issue by sharing their ideas and critiques with the editorial collective. gramsci , women and the state veronica vazquez garcia carleton university introduction the "unhappy marriage" between marxism and feminism has given rise to an extensive debate. however, the feminist scholarship dealing with ideology and consciousness has not worked within a marxist framework but rather has turned to psychoanalytic and poststructuralist theories to conceptualize consciousness, particularly the relationship of the body, sexuality and consciousness (sandra morgen, 1990). the purpose of this paper is to locate the feminist discussion of ideology within a neo-marxist framework by arguing the usefulness of some aspects of gramscian theory to feminist theory and to consider its implications for feminist politics. the paper is divided into four sections. in the first section i discuss some key concepts of gramscian thought. the second section involves an assessment of gramsci's work and suggests that he failed to account for both the sexual division of labour and women's oppression. the third and fourth sections focus on the use of key concepts of gramscian thought from a feminist theoretical perspective aiming to address this failure. finally, i outline some suggestions for feminist cultural critique and feminist politics drawing on gramsci's idea of counter-hegemony. i will organize my discussion of gramsci around his concept of hegemony as it relates to his conception of civil society. i will then seek to explore the implications of these two concepts for his political strategy in relation to the state. i will argue that gramsci's project for the construction of socialism and the revolution in the west neglects gender issues and as such can be located within the mainstream of marxist thought which leaves the sexual division of labour untouched. however, gramsci's concern with ideology allows for the theorization of the reproduction of patriarchy through cultural and ideological processes. more importantly, he helps us to understand the structures underpinning patriarchal ideology. similarly, feminist political agenda can be read as counter-hegemonic practices facing the type of state that gramsci had in mind. the focus of this paper is the reconceptualization of gramscian tools of analysis from a feminist perspective . gramsci: hegemony, civil society amd the state. the nature of gramsci' s texts has given rise to numerous problems. the prison notebooks were produced under difficult physical and intellectual conditions, and gramsci considered them "unfinished fragments, elements and indications for further study" (anne showstack sassoon, 1980:12). he used the same terms in different ways and created a code to deal with censorship. the development of his thought has been difficult to trace in terms of its continuity and change. consequently, there is a large variety of readings of gramsci. showstack sassoon refers to two types of readings. the first one, the "textual reading", "can attempt to trace the history of a concept internal to gramsci's theoretical work, examining gaps, contradictions, coherence, advances", while neglecting the historical context from which gramsci's work emerged (ibid:15). the second possible type of reading emphasises this context, namely, "the debates and the experiences of the second international and of the working-class movement in post-first world war europe" (ibid:16). showstack sassoon bel ieves that reference to this context is necessary to understand gramsci's major theoretical concerns. hence, gramsci's work can be read as dealing with the construction of socialism in the ussr as well as in terms of the "revolution in the west", which had to take into account special conditions of advanced capitalist societies. gramsci's major contribution to marxist theory is his departure from the economistic version of marxism which sees the relationship between the material relations of production and the superstructure (ideological, legal, and political practices) as a mechanical one, where the latter are determined by the former. for gramsci, "'popular beliefs' and similar ideas are themselves material forces" (gramsci, 1971: 165). ideas "are not spontaneously 'born' in each individual brain", but rather have "a centre of formation, of irradiation, of dissemination, of persuasion..." (ibid:192). ideology "is the more general term for the ways in which certain sets of ideas and assumptions become dominant forces in society" (tony bennett et al , 1981:207). these ideas are contained in 1. -language itself, which is a totality of determined notions and concepts and not just of words grammatically devoid of content; 2. -"common sense" and "good sense","3.popular religion and, therefore, also in the entire system of beliefs, superstitions, opinions, ways of seeing things and of acting, which are collectively bundled together under the name of 'folklore' (gramsci, 1971:323) . the implication of gramsci 's conception of ideology is fivefold: focus is shifted from the intellectual plane of philosophical systems to the formation of popular consciousness or common sense. second there is less emphasis on ideology as "system", as integrated or coherent. third ideological struggle is viewed, not as titanic struggles between rival weltanschauung, but as practical engagements about shifts and modifications in "common sense" or popular consciousness. fourth is the emphasis on ideologies as active processes which "'organize' human masses and create the terrain on which men (sic) move, acquire consciousness of their position, struggle, etc." (1971:377). fifth his conception of ideology is positive whilst marx's was negative. for marx ideology blocked and distorted, whilst for gramsci it provided the very mechanisms through which any participation in social life was possible (alan hunt, 1990:5) . gramsci 's conception of ideology as a non-unitary bloc where the interests of subordinate classes are constantly negotiated, allows us to trace the constitution of a social class as politically dominant in particular historical circumstances. gramsci calls hegemony the mobilizing capacity of a social class to both dominate subaltern classes and lead allied ones. he suggests that a class must exercise "leadership before winning governmental power", and when it becomes dominant "it must continue to 'lead' as well" (1971:58). a particular historical bloc emerges from the various processes of conflicts, negotiations and compromises among different classes and social groups. the hegemony that this historical bloc exercises "must necessarily be based on the decisive function exercised by the leading group [class] in the decisive nucleus of economic activity", but this nucleus is far from being the only determinant, since hegemony must also be "ethical -political" (ibid:161). hence, the political hegemony of a social class depends on its ability to generate "the 'spontaneous' consent given by the great mass of the population to the general direction imposed on social life by the dominant fundamental group [class]" (ibid:12). a new way of looking at the relationship between civil society and the state stems from gramsci 's conception of hegemony. for gramsci, civil society is no longer the private realm of mere economic relations, as in marx, but rather it is "the ensemble of organisms called "private'", where hegemony of the dominant class is exercised (idem). in other words, civil society is the social space where consent is generated and resistance to dominant hegemony may be built upon. as ralph dahrendorf puts it, civil society is "the intermediate world" between the state and the individual (1990:18). civil society is constituted by institutions whose degree of autonomy from the state vary from case to case. gramsci defines the state in modern societies as "the entire complex of practical and theoretical activities with which the ruling class not only justifies and maintains its dominance, but manages to win the active consent of those over whom it rules" (1971:244). by insisting that "by 'state' should be understood not only the apparatus of government, but also the 'private' apparatus of 'hegemony' or civil society" (ibid: 261), gramsci avoids an overemphasis on either the coercive or consensual elements of the state. he conceives the state as having a possible historical existence between the two poles of coercion and consent, and the relationship between civil society and the state takes a special form in every historical conjuncture. therefore, the distinction between civil society as the realm for consent and political society or the state as the realm for coercion is for gramsci a "methodological" rather than an "organic one". the relationship between civil society and the state is the major difference between the "east" and the "west": in russia the state was everything, civil society was primordial and gelatinous; in the west there was a proper relation between state and civil society, and when the state trembled a sturdy structure of civil society was at once revealed. the state was only on outer ditch, behind which there stood a powerful system of fortresses and earthworks (ibid:238). gramsci's new strategy for socialist revolution in the west stems from this distinction between the "east" and the "west". the fact that in the west there is a "sturdy structure of civil society", or a complex network of institutions, makes crucial the battle for hegemony. gramsci refers to this battle as the war of position. the success of the working class in this battle is the pre-condition for securing its political power. as anne showstack sassoon suggests, "the key phrase is gramsci's specification that once the war of position is won, it is won definitively. or, in other terms, only when the working class has won the battle of hegemony will it have triumphed definitively" (1980:196). this battle must continue during the building of socialism; it is never won once and for all. the war of position is a battle for hegemony in which intellectuals play an essential role. although gramsci believes that "all men [sic] are intellectuals" (1971:9) in the sense that all individuals make sense of their world, he makes clear that only some of them "have in society the function of intellectuals" (idem). this function is mainly on "organisational" and "connective" one. the intellectual's relationship with "the world of production" is "'mediated' by the whole fabric of society of which the intellectuals are, precisely, the 'functionaries'" (ibid:12). hence, intellectuals articulate social hegemony not only in the field of production, but also in that of culture and political administration (ibid:97). the degree of connection between intellectuals and "a fundamental social group" varies for each case, and gramsci suggests that a whole range of "organicity" of intellectual strata can be established depending on this connection. gramsci calls organic intellectuals those created together with a social class and responsible for giving this class homogeneity and an awareness of its own function not only in the economic but also in the social and political fields. the capitalist entrepreneur creates alongside himself the industrial technician, the specialist in political economy, the organisers of a new culture, of a new legal system, etc (ibid:5). traditional intellectuals, by contrast, are those "already in existence" when a new social class emerges. since they belong to a previous historical time, and have links with previous dominant classes, they remain unconnected with the emerging mode of production. traditional intellectuals "represent an historical continuity uninterrupted even by the most complicated and radical changes in political and social forms" (gramsci quoted by showstack sassoon, 1980) . since the nature of the relationship both between intellectuals themselves and between intellectuals and the various social classes affects the very nature of hegemony, it is essential that the working class creates its own organic intellectuals. it is within the party that these intellectuals are to be formed, since the party is the central organizer of the working class hegemony. gramsci compares the political party to the state in its role of articulating an hegemonic project: the political party... is precisely the mechanism which carries out in civil society the same function as the state carries out, more synthetically and over a larger scale, in political society. in other words it is responsible for welding together the organic intellectuals of a given group -the dominant oneand the traditional intellectuals. the party carries out this function in strict dependence on its basic function, which is that of elaborating its own component parts those elements of a social group which has been born and developed as an "economic" groupand of turning them into qualified intellectuals, leaders and organisers of all activities and functions inherent in the organic development of an integral society, both civil and political (gramsci, 1971:15-16). in order to turn the working class as an "economic group" into "qualified intellectuals, leaders and organizers", the party must exercise some leadership. this leadership must not be an "abstract" one but rather must apply itself to real men [sic], formed in specific historical relations, with specific feelings, outlooks, fragmentary conceptions of the world, etc., which [are] the result of "spontaneous' combinations of a given situation of material production with the * fortuitous' agglomeration within it of disparate social elements (ibid:198). the role of the party is to "educate", "direct", "purge of extraneous contaminations" this element of "spontaneity", in order to "bring it into line with modern theory -but in a living and historically effective manner" (idem). hence, the "unity between "spontaneity' and "conscious leadership' or "discipline' is precisely the real political action of the subaltern classes, insofar as this is mass politics and not merely an adventure by groups claiming to represent the masses" (idem). gramsci: a feminist critique gramsci 's originality is mainly due to his emphasis on the reproduction of forms of ideological domination through social practices at a daily level. from this conception of ideology, a paramount need is to look at civil society as a major site where dominant hegemony can be contested. however, the fact that gramsci wrote the prison notebooks thinking of a working class project somehow narrows the applicability of his categories to other kinds of analysis. gramsci's starting point is the assumption that the working class is being oppressed by the place it occupies in the relations of production, and therefore the working class is its own agent of liberation in the sense that it is capable of "leading" other classes towards revolutionary change. in the organization of working class hegemony, other social groups and classes can only work as either allies or enemies, and gramsci gives no indication about how to articulate the struggle against class oppression with other kinds of oppression other than under the working class and the party's leadership. hence, the whole set of categories of gramsci emerges from the centrality that the working class has in his project for socialist revolution. for example, although dominant hegemony is articulated at different levels of the superstructure by organic intellectuals, "it must be based on the decisive function exercised by the leading group [class] in the decisive nucleus of economic activity" (ibid:161) and therefore is closely linked to material relations of production, or "the factory" (ibid:285). this does not have to be a problem per se, except for the fact that gramsci also assumes that all the members of the working class are male, and in doing so he obscures women's oppression not only as members of the working class but also as women. this problem becomes relevant in gramsci's discussion of fordism, which deals with gramsci's exposure of monogamy among the working class as functional for capitalist profit. gramsci draws the link between a discipline of the instincts in the assembly-line and a regimentation of sexual life and in so doing he shows how capitalism has generated a civilta or a way of living beneficial to capitalist production. however, only the classes tied to production are subjected to puritanical morality, since the ""puritanical' initiatives simply have the purpose of preserving, outside of work, a certain psycho-physical equilibrium which prevents the physiological collapse of the worker, exhausted by the new method of production" (gramsci quoted by buci -glucksmann , 1980:84). concerning the morality of classes other than the working class, gramsci argues that 8 the most noteworthy fact in the american phenomenon in relation to these manifestations is the gap which has been formed and is likely to be increasingly accentuated, between the morality and way of life of the workers and those of other strata of the population (1971:304). thus, gramsci's claim that "the new industrialism wants monogamy" (idem) refers only to the working class' family where monogamy as a repression of sexual needs can be explained by the link of the worker to the relations of production. however, this repression applies only to male workers who cannot afford "a night of 'excess'" after work because it affects their performance at work the following day. gramsci does not speak about the repression of women's sexuality, and so we have to assume that there is not such thing, or that it is similar to that of their husbands (which, needless to say, is quite unlikely) if women are also working in the assembly line. moreover, gramsci leaves unproblematized the availability of women to meet men's sexual needs, when equating the (male) worker's impossibility "to dedicate himself to the pursuit of drink or to sport or evading the law" (idem) to his lack of time for "womanizing", since all these activities demand too much leisure. gramsci does not talk about the male worker's wife nor does he problematize the existence of prostitutes with whom working class men can have a "night of excess" whereas their wives cannot. the only type of prostitutes gramsci speaks of are the wives of american mil lionaires who go to europe to "contract 'marriages' for a season" as a way of escaping boredom and a mere form of entertainment (ibid: 306). gramsci's discussion of puritanical morality precludes the possibility of analysis of the family as a realm where a different type of relations of subordination of women by men takes place. gramsci does not examine the sexual division of labour and the power relations between men and women resulting from this division, and therefore the little insight that he sheds in the nature of women's oppression is an appendix of the relations of production, where women's situation is defined by their husbands' link to these relations. women whose husbands are closely tied to these relations do not represent a problem (repression of sexuality in gramsci refers only to male sexuality), while women whose husbands are millionaires are "luxury mammals" and can afford behaving like prostitutes as a way of entertainment. what is even more striking is that gramsci speaks of these millionaires as hardworking men whose wealth make their wives passive, and so the "loose" morality of upper classes is applicable only to women. gramsci presents the "prostitution" of women of the upper classes as resulting from their own will ("the women, with nothing to do, travel" [idem]) rather than from men's financial power, while the prostitution of women in the lower classes is not even dealt with. gramsci's assumption that all members of the working class are male translates into his agenda for cultural critique and therefore the scope of this critique is a limited one. the critique of culture involves for gramsci "a critique of capitalist civilization" in order to form "the unified consciousness of the proletariat" (gramsci quoted by buci-glucksmann, 1980:39); he refers to his own work in the cultural field as a battle for a culture that would be "an instrument and form needed for the political emancipation of a class" (ibid:79). accordingly, the intellectuals who organize a counter-hegemonic project "have to be oriented towards the revolutionary proletariat" (ibid:28) and must work with the political party. when gramsci talks about the role of the party as articulator of a new civilta he clearly refers to the working class as the generator of these new ways of life and calls them "proletarian culture". hence, although it is true that there is great novelty in gramsci's political strategy for social change, the new hegemony he refers to is a working class hegemony which leaves untouched other forms of oppression. the key issue now is to examine the extent to which gramsci's failure to account for women's oppression and his project of emancipation for the working class obscures gender inequality and precludes women's own emancipatory practices. in other words, the usefulness of gramscian analysis for feminist politics has to established. i think that the possibility exists for a dialogue between gramsci and feminist theory in order to expose women's oppression and explore how it interweaves with class oppression. however, this is not a matter of just "adding on" women to the gramscian project in terms of political struggle, but rather of giving centrality to the relationships of oppression of women by 10 men in theoretical analysis. this kind of work has to be done if we want to create critical awareness and problematize works produced by progressive intellectuals, such as paul willis' learning to labour , (1977) where patriarchal attitudes and assumptions of working class "lads" are uncritically viewed as forms of resistance to dominant hegemony (angela mcrobbie, 1981). women and civil society as pointed out in the previous section, gramsci's assumption that all members of the working class are male leads to a failure to theorize women's oppression in the work place and in other spheres of their lives. in this section, i will discuss the socialist feminist approach to women's subordination in capitalist society in order to broaden the gramscian project of counterhegemony by incorporating into the analysis two points traditionally overlooked by marxist class analysis: a)the notion of a gendered working class (and labour force) and b)the sphere of reproduction. i will mainly refer to alison m. jaggar's (1983) account of socialist feminist theory. socialist feminists believe that "a full understanding of the capitalist system requires a recognition of the way in which it is structured by male dominance and, conversely, that a full understanding of contemporary male dominance requires a recognition of the way it is organized by the capitalist division of labour" (alison m. jaggar, 1983:125). hence, the socialist feminist approach utilizes the method of historical materialism to explore "the social relations that constitute humans not only as workers and capitalists but also as women and men" (ibid:132). in order to achieve this, socialist feminist theory attempts to reconceptual ize both the private sphere of human reproduction and the public sphere of human production. socialist feminists argue that human reproduction is a form of labour and that the prevailing system of organizing reproduction is alienating and exploitative for women. this theory provides a way of understanding the segregation by sex of the labour force as well as sexuality, childbearing and personal maintenance in political and economic terms. 11 socialist feminists' major divergency with traditional marxism is their conception of what sets of relationships constitute the economic base of a mode of production. they claim that the economic foundation of society includes a characteristic system of organizing procreation [reproduction] which, in historical times, has been defined in part by a characteristic sexual division of labour. this system of procreation is among the most pervasive influences on the culture of a society, understood in the sense of its "legal, political, religious, aesthetic and philosophic ... forms" and is important in setting limits to what forms can ultimately exist in that society. much feminist theory consist precisely in tracing connections between the sexual division of labour and procreation, the sexual division of labour in the market and the ideological sexism embodied in law, politics, religion, aesthetics and philosophy (ibid:142). thus, socialist feminists believe it is misleading to think of the public and private as two distinct spheres: "production" and "reproduction", work and the family, far from being separate territories like the moon and the sun of the kitchen and the shop, are really intimately related modes that reverberate upon one another and frequently occur in the same social, physical, and even psychic spaces... not only reproduction and kinship, or the family, have their own, historical ly determined, products, material techniques, modes or organization and power relationships, but reproduction and kinship are themselves integrally related to the social relations of production and the state, they reshape these relations all the time (rosalind petchesky quoted by alison m. jaggar , ibid : 146) . 12 similarly, joan kelly believes that we can no longer focus upon productive relations of class, suppressing those of consumption (sexuality/family) as marx did, or focus on sex and family arrangements (freud, and juliet mitchell in psychoanalysis and feminism ) without those of class, any more than we can place one sex in the category of sexuality/family and the other in that of society. to do so violates our social experience and the new consciousness that is emerging out of it. a more complex pattern of sociosexual arrangements is called for and is appearing in feminist social thought. feminist thought regards the sexual /f ami 1 ial organization of society as integral to any conception of social structure or social change. and conversely, it sees the relation of the sexes as formed by both socioeconomic and sexual-familial structures in their systematic interconnectedness (ibid:147) . by including childbearing and sexual activities into the socio-economic foundation of society, socialist feminist theory broadens the set of institutions that shape civil society. from a socialist feminist perspective, civil society is not, as in marx, the realm of mere relations of production. nor is it "the ensemble of organisms called 'private'", as in gramsci , since he did not see the specificity of relations of subordination of women by men in some institutions of civil society. as pointed out by mary o'brien: gramsci's notion of civil society is . . . circumscribed by his fixation on education and his neglect of family relations. he speaks of civil society as local culture centred on school and family but ... has little to say about family. he is more interested in the birth of organic intellectuals than in the birth of real babies (1984:92) . by contrast, socialist feminist theory demonstrates that sexuality and reproduction are organized through institutions such as 13 marriage and the family, which have a historical development, are subject to state regulation and are closely interconnected with the relations of production. sexuality and reproduction are a part of the socio-economic foundation of society or the public sphere, and civil society is constituted by institutions that channel women into motherhood and childbearing and the sex-segregated job market. accordingly, the conception of dominant hegemony implies not only class domination but also male supremacy. an analysis of dominant hegemony must explore the relationship between, on the one hand, women's lack of access to resources and economic as well as political power and, on the other hand, the social constructions of motherhood and "women's work". the conception of dominant hegemony can illuminate the processes through which male supremacy is accepted as common sense and as part of the natural order in order to explore women's consent to patriarchal practices or, in jaggar's words, women's "internalization" of their oppressive "external" reality. finally, gramsci's notion of counter-hegemony allows us to see patriarchal ideology as' a non-unitary bloc where women may constantly open up spaces for negotiation. women and the state a feminist approach to the state must explore the processes through which the whole set of interconnections between the division of labour in the domestic sphere, the labour market and state policy reproduce male supremacy and capitalist relations of production while also creating new contradictions in people's lives and hence new spaces for negotiation. this analysis is essential because the fact that today most women combine formal paid work with full adult domestic responsibilities or (as in the third world) perform several activities as a source for extra income (i.e. the informal sector) coupled with domestic work at home has generated a whole new set of policies which directly affect women. state policies have the power to construct categories of women as workers and mothers. state legislation sets the limits within which women control their own sexuality in terms of birth control, abortion law, maternity leaves and child care services. it also establishes the legal means and implications of forming or dissolving a family unit. in other words, the state has a lot of 14 say in the organization of reproduction, in the sense that it reinforces existing familial forms where women are responsible for taking care of the family needs. this fact creates constant contradictions in women's lives and opens up new spaces for negotiation . the expansion of the welfare state aiming to respond to emerging women's needs is a process that can be traced from a gramscian perspective. concomitantly, possibilities for social change can be explored in the articulation of these new needs which the state decides to either act or not act upon. gramsci helps to see pieces of legislation on women's needs as resulting from pressures that the women's movement puts on a capitalist state and at the same time as an attempt of this state to intervene into a new area of civil society in order to avoid possible social explosion and reorganize a social base of consent. thus, gramsci is useful to see the changes of state practices as a positive "sign of ideological change in the wider society and a measure of the strength of women's mobilizations", while keeping in mind that "the ideological consensus into which feminist demands are integrated is not only one that balances gender oppression, but is fundamentally conservative, part of managing a society by a capitalist state" (heather jon maroney, 29). gramsci then offers the theoretical guidelines for a "third way" in feminist politics. his notion of historical bloc highlights the relationship between women and the state, an overlooked area of study in feminist literature (jane jenson, 1986; drude dahlerup, 1987). from a gramscian perspective, women's needs can be seen as partially represented in the dominant hegemony in a particular historical conjuncture. this representation can be viewed as resulting from processes of negotiation between different social groups and interests, among them women's organizations. the notion of historic bloc allows us to escape from an instrumental view of the state (i.e. men control the state and use it to keep women in a subordinate position) or a functionalist one (i.e. the state is a patriarchal state and in all ways contributes to women's oppression). since the historic bloc is not reducible to a ruling class or group (i.e. men), it allows to see the state as a structure where various groups and interests are unevenly organized 15 rather than as an entity with its own will (i.e. "the state is at present looking for new forms of patriarchal control", zillah eisenstein quoted by dahlerup, 1987). consequently, the state becomes an arena of negotiation where some battles can be "won" by subordinate groups, in this case women. however, gramsci's emphasis on both sides of domination (coercion and consent) keeps us away from the danger of overestimating these triumphs. indeed, gramsci's war of position allows us to overcome the difficulty of considering the same state action as either oppressive of women or liberating, if we place it within a context of constant negotiation. more importantly, gramsci reminds us of the importance of civil society as a major arena where consensus occurs and a counter-hegemonic project must be built upon. in her analysis of women's dual role and the british welfare state, anne showstack sassoon argues that there is a contradiction between the domestic sphere, the world of work and the welfare state, in that the institutions and practices of the welfare state are organized around the same traditional model of work and domestic life, where women remain the backbone of domestic labour, and the world of work is organized round a "male model" which assumes one human being at work for, say, forty hours a week (plus commuting and possible overtime) with a partner available fulltime for domestic tasks (1987:160). showstack sassoon describes these conflicts as "part of a long-term development, what gramsci would have called an organic crisis" (idem). accordingly, she points out that "a battle on all fronts, a war of position in gramsci's terms, a strategy of reforms" (ibid:174) is the solution to the problem. hence, she suggests that the struggle should involve not only the negotiation over "caring and servicing responsibilities" between civil society and the state, but also the emergence of "post-male models of work", that is, a structural change in the organization of people's time. this change would imply the abolition of particular conceptions of male work and female work, both in the labour market and the family, as well as a total restructuration of the sexual division of labour at 16 all levels of society. in order to do so, showstack sassoon states that a "cultural revolution" both in the part of women and men is needed. in other words, state legislation favouring child care and parental leaves are a necessary but not sufficient condition to achieve equality between women and men. civil society as a whole should be involved in the implementation of changes in the organization of all spheres of work. the logic of work in the productive sphere as well as that of state provided services should be transformed in order to meet the social needs of concrete individuals . the socialist feminism's goal of human emancipation involves not only the full development of human potentialities through free productive labour, but also "for free sexual expression, for freely bearing children and for freely rearing them" (alison m. jaggar, 1983:131). this ideal of human well-being also calls for change in all institutions in civil society: to restructure how we come to know self and others in our birthing, growing up, loving and working, feminist politics must reach the institutions that fatefully bear upon sexuality, family, and community. schools and all socializing agencies will have to be rid of sex and sexual bias. work and welfare will have to be placed in the humane context of the basic right to all to live, work, and love in dignity. and there will have to be a genuine participation by all in shaping the modes and purposes of our labour and distributing its returns. a feminist politics that aims at abolishing all forms of hierarchy so as to restructure personal relations as well as relations among peers has to reach and transform the social organization of work, property and power (joan kelly quoted by alison m. jaggar, ibid:147) socialist feminism's conception of social change underpin the necessity of new types of organizations to bring about this change. showstack sassoon suggests that organizations such as trade unions should be concerned not only with the protection of people's work but also with the organization of their domestic needs in relation 17 to their paid work and vice versa, and break with the assumption "that people should adjust their lives to the job and not the other way around" (1987:176). analogously, jaggar argues that the organizations advocated by socialist feminists are not only dedicated to overthrow the capitalist mode of production but also to struggle against the way through which men perpetuate their dominance: rape, sexual harassment, domestic assault, refusal to take equal share of household responsibilities and sexism within the organizations themselves (1983:331-332). socialist feminists advocate the need for a cultural revolution and believe that the creation of a women's culture is an important way in which women can develop political selfconsciousness. jaggar argues that a socialist feminist culture is part of a wide range of political activity which has not clearcut priorities; socialist feminists struggle on all fronts and constantly pursue to create alternative institutions. however, they are aware of the limits that the larger society imposes on the possibilities of alternative ways for living and working. there is a great similarity between gramsci's idea that the working class has to ensure hegemony before winning political power and the socialist feminist approach to social change: socialist feminists expect that there will be a distinctive revolutionary period, characterized by acute social turmoil, but they also expect that the outcome of this turmoil will be determined by the kind and quality of the pre-revolutionary activity that preceded it. to this extent, they see themselves not so much as living the revolution as preparing for it and attempting in limited ways to prefigure it (ibid:340). before the social turmoil reaches us, i shall give an example of the type of institutional change socialist feminists are aiming for. in her study on the effects that the work of feminist teachers has for social change, kathleen weiler combines three major themes of feminist methodology with some of the premises of what she calls critical educational theory, of which gramsci is considered an essential contribution. the first theme is that "feminist researchers begin their investigation of the social world from a 18 grounded position in their own subjective oppression", what "leads them to a sensitivity to power that comes from being subordinate". second, "feminist research is characterized by an emphasis on lived experience and the significance of everyday life". finally, "feminist research is politically committed". these two last themes imply that feminist research has to shed light in women's personal experiences of subjugation within a male dominated society and that this research is committed to search for ways to change women's situation (1988: 58-59). from critical educational theory weiler retains gramsci's "analysis of the power of hegemonic ideas to shape consciousness coupled with his unshakable belief in the power of critique and political activism" (ibid:17). accordingly, weiler argues that the gramscian concept of counter-hegemony has to be applied to feminist work, because counter-hegemony "implies a more critical theoretical understanding and is expressed in organized and active political opposition" (ibid:54). weiler concludes that the in the school , which she considers an "institution for social control", the attitudes of feminist teachers can be viewed as counter-hegemonic in that they encourage students to explore the forces acting upon their own lives and to understand their own history and culture: in their work, these feminist teachers raise issues of sexism and racism directly in texts, but also in classroom relationships with students. as feminists they make the gendered subjectivities of themselves and their students part of the texts they teach. and at the same time, they ground a critical inquiry in a deep respect for their student's lives and cultural values (ibid:149). the points of intersection between gramsci and feminism can be clearly drawn upon in this last paragraph: both gramsci and feminism stress the importance of daily lives and cultural values (or, in gramsci's words, "popular beliefs"); both of them believe that these values reproduce power relations (or, in gramsci's words, dominant hegemony) and therefore they require critical inquiry (or, in gramsci's words, the struggle between "common sense" and "good sense" has to be carried out), which in turn opens up spaces for negotiation. and finally, the work of inquiry is undertaken both at the level of texts, and at the level of social 19 relationships between teachers and students and the students themselves. in gramsci's words, ideology is not a set of ideas but rather a set of material practices and social relations. once the central role of a male working class in instigating social change has been problematized, the question still remains of which social group or class is more likely to bring about social change, or where is it going to come from. evidently, the socialist feminist answer to this question is that women must play an essential role in bringing about social change. in fact, it can be argued that there has been an increasing role of women's participation in socialist revolutions, with nicaragua as the best example of a crucial women's involvement in the revolutionary as well as in the post-revolutionary period (maxine molyneux, 1985, 1989). it is clear now that, after nicaragua, there cannot be a socialist revolution without women, or in other words, a real revolution must be not only a socialist but rather a socialist feminist one. interestingly, women's involvement has been determined not only by their concern to protect specific women's interests, but also to defend popular-democratic or national interests, like in nicaragua, where a long anti-american tradition rooted in a popular movement existed long time before the sandinistas took power in 1979. in that particular case, women were struggling not only against their subordinate status in society but also against a dictatorship backed up by american intervention. correspondingly, women were benefited by post-revolutionary policies not only as women but also as members of a particular class, since these "policies were targeted in favour of the poorest sections of the population and focused on basic needs in the areas of health, housing, education and food subsidies" (maxine molyneux, 1985:248). obviously, poor women benefited more than other women, although needless to say, women formed more than 60 percent of the poorest nicaraguans (idem). thus, the case of nicaragua is useful to see how factors of class, gender, race, ethnicity and nationality intersect in a particular historical conjuncture, so that it becomes difficult to establish the role of a particular class or group to "lead" the revolution. my suggestion here is that, rather than establishing a priori the revolutionary agent, we have to emphasize the idea that 20 counter -hegemony involves the articulation of the interests of various classes and groups, and that this articulation depends on the visibility of these classes and groups in a particular historical moment. again, the gestation of counter-hegemony has to be looked at as an ongoing process of negotiation. however, this is not to say that class or group interests are indistinguishable from one another or equally valid, or that the articulation is an easy one and goes without struggle between and within the groups. rather, the case of nicaragua demonstrates that women must constantly put pressure on the revolutionary government to defend women's interests and, more importantly, that women must have their own independent organizations. in this sense, a distinction between different levels within a counter-hegemonic project regarding women's interests can be established, similar to the different stages that alan hunt describes for the "incorporative hegemony" of the working class (1990:7-10). molyneux's distinction between strategic gender interests and practical gender interests is an useful one for this purpose. molyneux grounds her distinction on the recognition that "there is no theoretically adequate and universally applicable causal explanation of women's oppression from which a general account of women's interests can be derived" (231). hence, "a theory of interests that has an application to the debate about women's capacity to struggle for and benefit from social change must begin by recognizing difference rather than by assuming homogeneity" (232). molyneux's distinction helps us to explain how the intersection among different factors other than gender that affect women -class, ethnicity, nationality and so onproduce different ways of defining women's interests. according to molyneux, strategic gender interests are those derived in the first instance deductively, that is, from the analysis of women's subordination and from the formulation of an alternative, more satisfactory set of arrangements to those which exist . . . such as the abolition of the sexual division of labour, the alleviation of the burden of domestic labour and childcare, the removal of institutionalized forms of 21 discrimination, the attainment of political equality, the establishment of freedom of choice over childbearing , and the adoption of adequate measures against male violence and control over women . . . the demands that are formulated on this basis are usually termed "feminist" as is the level of consciousness required to struggle effectively for them ( ibid: 232-233) . in contrast , practical gender interests are given inductively and arise from the concrete conditions of women's positioning within the gender division of labour ... [they ] are formulated by the women who are themselves within these positions rather than through external interventions. practical interests are usually a response to an immediate perceived need, and they do not generally entail a strategic goal such as women's emancipation or gender equality (ibid:233) hence, women's special interest in domestic provision and public welfare is a practical gender interest which does not necessarily promote gender equality, since it may eventually strengthen women's role as the primary responsible for the household daily welfare. the two levels of gender interests can be articulated differently into what alan hunt refers to as "incorporative hegemony". according to him "for a hegemony to be dominant it must address and incorporate, if only partially, some aspects of the aspirations, interests and ideology of subordinate groups" (1990:6). just as the working class has to give up some of its interests when articulating this "incorporative hegemony" in order to transcend the "economic-corporate" stage and reach that of "hegemonic consciousness", women may also have to give up temporarily the final goal of complete abolition of gender inequality (a strategic gender interest) whilst still struggling for gender practical interests. however, this is not to say that women should substitute the male working class or any other group in the leadership of a counter-hegemonic project; rather, the complexity of social reality and the intersection of different factors influencing social change call for a more pluralistic 22 conception of agency, where, as stated before, different social groups have more or less weight and say in a counter-hegemonic historical bloc depending on their visibility at a particular moment in history. in this sense, it is essential to stress again the necessity of women's own independent organizations whose final goal must be to overcome women's subordination; needless to say, the initiative to achieve this goal must come primarily from women. conclusions in this paper i have argued that gramsci's assumption that all members of the working class are male leads to a failure to theorize women's oppression in the work place and other spheres of their lives. consequently, gramsci's working class hegemony is a male hegemony and his project for socialist revolution does not include per se women's emancipation. the socialist feminist approach to women's subordination brings the organization of reproduction into the agenda and inserts the significance of gender into the labour process. this allows us to explain not only the constitution of people as capitalists and workers but. also as women and men. thus, gramsci's project of counter-hegemony should include changes in the sexual division of labour at all levels of society. in this sense, gramsci is useful to grasp the processes of articulation of women needs within a historical bloc as well as women's responses to the existing contradictions in their own lives through the negotiation with the state over servicing and caring responsibilities, which are deeply shaped by the sexual division of labour. finally, i discussed some similarities between gramsci's suggestion to organize a new alternative hegemony at the level of civil society before gaining political power and the feminist claims that "the personal is political" and "a woman's place is everywhere". gramsci's conception of the relationship between civil society and the state and his notion of war of position over civil society provide the theoretical guidelines for feminist politics in order to keep on thinking of the personal as political and seek to change people's ideas of a socially constructed femininity which is oppressive for women, search for alliances in the process of gestation of counter-hegemony and dismiss as irrelevant the dilemma to struggle either "within or outside the state". 23 references bennett, tony,et al.(ed) culture, ideology and social process. london: the open university press, 1981. buci-glucksmann, christine. gramsci and the state. london: lawrence and wishart, 1980. dahlerup, drude. confusing concepts -confusing reality: a theoretical discussion of the patriarchal state, in anne showstack sassoon, women and the state . london: hutchinson, 1987. gramsci, antonio. selections from the prison notebooks . new york: international publishers, 1971. hunt, alan. rights and social movements: counter-hegemonic strategies . february 1990. jaggar, alison m. feminist politics and human nature . sussex: the harvester press, 1983. jenson, jane. gender and reproduction, or babies and the state. studies in political economy 20 , summer 1986. la sociedad civil amenazada. una entrevista con ralph dahrendorf . nexos 154 , mexico city, october 1990. maroney, heather jon. using gramsci for women: feminism and the quebec state, 1960-1980. rfr/ drf vol ume 17 number 3 . mcrobbie, angela. setting accounts with subcultures: a feminist critique, in tony bennett (ed.), culture, ideology and social process , london: the open university press, 1981. molyneux, maxine. mobilization without emancipation? women's interests, the state and revolution in nicaragua. feminist studies 11. no. 2 , summer 1985. 24 -. women's role in the nicaraguan revolutionary process: the early years. promissory notes n.y.:monthly review press, 1989. morgen, sandra. conceptualizing and changing consciousness: socialist-feminist perspectives, in women, class and the feminist imagination . philadelphia: temple university press, 1990. o'brien, mary. hegemony and superstructure: a feminist critique of neo-marxism. in mccalla vickers, gill taking sex into account ottawa: carleton university press, 1984. showstack sassoon, anne. gramsci's politics. london: croom helm ltd, 1980. . women's new social role: contradictions of the welfare state, in women and the state, 1987. weiler, kathleen. women teaching for change. gender, class and power . mass.: bergin & garvey publishers, inc., 1988. willis, paul. learning to labour . westmead, england: saxon house, 1977. 25 sujet de droit et sujets de droit: de la pratique juridiquc au pluriel daniel sansfacon cet article s ' adresse au droit. ii y est question de discours juridique mais aussi de discours marxiste sur le droit. par i'analyse d'un exemple conoret de discours juridique, i'auteur explore quelques problemes d'une theorie marxiste de droit, suggerant principalement une decentration du discours marxi3te , et propose une recherche ulterieure. alternate routes vol. 5 1982 68 this article deals with law and some problems in a marxist theory of law. although many marxian theorists treat the law as being concerned with a uniform subject, the argument here is that law, as a complex practice , creates different subjects, not all of which may be equated with homo economicus , a topic for future research i3 proposed. l'analyse marxiste de l'univers jurdique se contente souvent de l'articuler a l'etat conune forme necessaire de la domination de la forme marchande fetichisee et par la de la bourgeoisie. inversement, les jurisprudences offrent un discours idealiste, coupe de la materialite des pratiques sociales, qui presente le droit comme un ensemble de regies se developpant sur la base de relations evoluant vers la raison. le droit lui-meme par ailleurs rebute, par son langage formel, ses technical ites , sa complexite'. pourtant, le juridique est de toutes les relations sociales. pourtant aussi, l'imagerie juridique la plus vehiculee, et apparemment la plus simple, 1 ' idee de justice, est aussi, peut-etre, l'une des notions les plus complexes. dans le droit, de facon indelebile, il y a d'abord le sujet de droit. si l'on peut dire "nulla crimen, nulla poene 69 sine lege", a plus forte raison peut-on dire sans sujet point de droit. or cette question du sujet est elle-meme rien moins que fort complexe. et si 1 'analyse marxiste du droit et de son sujet a certes permis des propres, elle n'en demeure pas moins gravement fautive. c'est du moins ce que pretend cette courte et bien partielle etude, ou il sera question non plus de sujet de droit mais bien des sujets du juridique. l'univers juridique le juridique occupe une place particuliere dans la formation sociale capitaliste. ii se place a la fois dans la societe, ou il regie les differends qui opposent les individus entre eux ou individus et institutions; mais il se situe aussi au-dessus d'elle en ce qu'il se veut le rempart de la legitimite (e.g. la constitution) et la representation (ideale) d'un ordre ultime a atteindre. qui plus est, le droit ne se limite pas a regler un champ donn§ d'activites mais s'etend a toutes les spheres de la vie sociale: depuis les relations economiques jusqu'aux formes politiques, en passant par le fonctionnement des institutions et appareils d'etat jusqu'au comportement individuel. le juridique ne constitute done certes pas un champ monolithique qui se pourrait aborder dans son ensemble d'un coup d'oeil global et general. bien au contraire la sphere juridique ressemble a un molosse eclate. pourtant, la systematisation et la technique juridiques, dans la forme du droit et de la loi, presentent un caractere unifie sous les principes d'equite, de justice et de "due process". ainsi, il n'est pas rare d'entendre parler de faqon equivalente de droit et de justice, comme de deux cotes inseparables d'une alternate routes vol. 5 1982 70 meme piece. les reglements de litiges ou les assurances juridiques a la legitimite deviennent justice: que justice soit faite ! et le ce*lebre symbole de la balance juridique de reapparai tre . ii y a la une premiere confusion: celle du droit et de la loi, dont il sera question plus loin. mais il faut ici souligner qu'entre la loi adoptee par le legislateur dans une enceinte democratique et la loi prononcee par le juge qui, dans 1 'enceinte de la cour, devient droit, se glissent, a prime abord, des differences. une premiere se trouve dans l'acte lui-meme: l'elu du peuple qui accorde son appui i un texte le fait au nom, dit-il, de ses commettants . le juge qui se prononce sur un texte et l'evalue "a sa juste valeur" le fait au nom de la justice, dont un tiers l'a imparti. une seconde tient i 1 ' impact et au contenu de la decision: l'elu accorde ou refuse son appui, c'est-a-dire qu'il se pose publiquement en faveur ou en defaveur d'un texte. le juge qui tranche un litige accorde un droit et/ou refuse une pretention de droit ou de fait: il departit done des odposants. une troisieme difference apparente tient a la division des pouvoirs: l'elu appartient au corps l€gislatif et le juge au corps judiciaire, et si l'un et l'autre travaillent de concert a batir l'ordre social, ils n'en restent pas moins independants ; le premier travaille a ^laborer une politique de bien commun, le second al'appliquer i la transformer en "common law" du moins a 1 'experience de la realitg. ces differences ne sont rien moins qu ' apparences ce qui ne signifie pas que pour concretes qu'elles soient elles 71 n'aient une efficace propre dans la formation des pratiques sociales et individuelles . d'abord 1'acte. l'elu avons-nous dit le conjugue a 1 'opinion publique, le juge au texte du droit dans lequel se decouvre la justesse du legislateur, et la justice par extension. de deux actes d'abord differencies il ne reste qu'un, celui de l'expression sociale d'un pouvoir. ii pourrait bien ne pas s'agir du meme douvoir cependant puisque , selon la seconde difference l'elu tranche pour exposer publiquement ses convictions, alors que le juge decide impartialement de la justice. encore que justice et convictions ne soient pas si eloignees au sens ou les convictions du juge decideront du lieu ou se situe la justice. mais surtout , il s'agit du meme exercice social du pouvoir en ce que l'un et 1 'autre produisent, via des moyens divergeants certes , une discrimination. discrimination, nous dit la troisieme difference entre le bien commun et les inte'rsts specifiques pour le legislateur et entre justice et injustice pour le juge. dans un cas comme dans 1' autre cependant, cette discrimination s'exerce a partir des representations faites devant l'autorite par les parties antagonistes defendant chacune leur conception de ce qui est et de ce qui doit etre. voila justement ce qui unit davantage juge et legislateur que ce qui ne les separe: l'etre et le devoir-etre. parce que munis chacun d'un mandat sur l'origine duquel nous ne nous attarderons pas , elu et juge decident de ce qui est et de ce qui doit etre. et au nom de qui, sinon, en derni^re instance, du "sujet"? car dans l'un et l'autre cas, c'est le meme sujet qui git au centre des preoccupations du legislateur et du juge. ici, sujet politique alternate routes vol. 5 1982 72 et suiet de droit se confondent, indif ferencies et pourtant sollicites di f fgremment , qui au nom du bien commun, qui au nora de la iustice. en somme, le sujet est a la fois le sujet de 1 ' ir.teret general et des interets particul iers . apparemment done , et apparemment de fagons distinctes, le legislateur et le judiciaire investissent le sujet. mais quel suiet? le politique dit l'un; le justiciable dit l'autre; et en derniere instance ils ne font qu'un. ii y a la un discours commun. discours qui curieusement est commun aussi a certains marxistes analysant le juridique. ainsi, pashukanis (1978), bien que cherchant une analyse de la forme juridique dans les relations objectives qui la fondent et qu'elle vient ensuite regler, constate-til que le forme juridique correspond en derniere analyse a la forme marchandise de l'schange capitaliste. en d'autres termes , la forme marchandise fetichisee par la valeur acquise dans le processus d' exploitation du travail est transoosee dans le domaine juridique via le marche. dans la forme iuridique, se revele le fetichisme du sujet porteur de droits qui est libre d'echanger et de s'echanger, a valeur egale, sur le marche. de meme , miaille (1976) soutient un raisonnement similaire. selon lui, seul le concept d'une personnalite' iuriiique pourvue de droits et libre de participer au marche' pouvait permettre la realisation globale du processus de production capitaliste: en effet, le suiet de droit est sujet de droits virtuels, tout a fait abstraits: anim6 par sa seule volont6, il a la possibility, la liberty ie s'obliger, notamment de vendre sa force de travail a un autre sujet de droit (miaille, 19^6:132) . 73 ainsi, la ou les relations de production capitalistes se developpent, et la ou l'echange marchand est fetichise, il y aura necessairement creation d'un sujet de droit. en somme , la categorie de sujet de droit permet "la realisation des echanges marchands generalises" (miaille, 1976:132). bien que de maniere differente, et inspire plus particulierement des travaux d'althusser, edelman soutient aussi la centralite du sujet dans le discours juridique: l 1 ideologic juridique se denonce en dressant son acte de naissance. et son acte de naissance, c'est la postulation que l'homme est naturellement un sujet de droit, i.e. un proprietaire en puissance, puisqu'il est de son essence de s'approprier la nature (edelman, 1973:17). c'est de la qu'edelman developpe son essai sur le droit et la photographie . dans ce processus ou, en un premier temps le droit nie le suj et photographe en niant son activite comme artistique pour la releguer au plan d'une technique, et ou en un second temps, le capital investissant le champ photographique et cinematographique , le droit reconnait un sujet de droit qui cependant est le producteur, i.e. le capitaliste, et non plus le "createur" i.e. le photographe ou le realisateur on reconnait ici les effets de denegation et de deplacement althusseriens il faut voir, nous dit edelman, le cycle du capital se refermer sur lui-meme. ce a quoi on assiste ici, c'est done a une "sur-appropriation du reel", e'est-a-dire a 1 ' appropriation d'un reel "deja investi par la propriete" (1973:29-30). de dire edelman, dans ce proces, "le droit fixe et assure la realisation, comme donne naturel, de la sphere de la circulation" et simultanement "il rend possible la alternate routes vol. 5 1982 74 production" [1973:37). le sujet de droit est done encore 1 ' incarnation privilegiee de son interpellation par le processus de circulation, puisqu'il est constitue libre, volontaire, propr ietaire , en mesure de contracter, e'est-a-dire de se vendre comme objet sur le marche . le problemat ique du sujet de droit n'appartient done pas qu'au juridique lui-meme. bien sur, elle y est posee en des termes fort differents: en termes idealistes, theologiques ou "socioloqiques" " . ainsi, le sujet juridique y est ici un sujet naturel, i.e. naturellement donne pour le droit soit par la volonte divine, soit par la nature des choses. ou si le sujet est socialement cree, il sera dans l'ordre des choses qu'une juridicite vienne regler les interactions humaines. que se soit dans la perspective marxiste ou autre, le sujet occupe done une position centrale dans le droit. mais plus particul ierement pour la perspective marxiste, le sujet juridique se confond avec le sujet economique. on essentialise ainsi la forme juridique, e'est-a-dire qu'on lui donne une essence qui est celle de correspondre aux pratiques economiques, et encore plus, de les permettre meme. d'autre part, on reduit la forme juridique \ son expression fetichiste du sujet comme sujet libre et possedant une valeur (d'6change) egale. comme le souligne hirst (1979:111), ce genre d'analyse inverse en les repliquant les perspectives idealistes. de meme, ces approches presupposent une efficace au droit non seulement dans la creation du sujet juridique mais dans la regulation des pratiques economiques . enfin, ces positions ont deux autres effets complementaires : elles fetichisent la forme juridique, 75 i.e. en font une superstructure ideologique qui en soi n'est qu'un "derive" des conditions in frastructurales , mais paradoxalement, elles accordent au droit une legitimite qu'il se pretend, a savoir sa capacite de definir le sujet et ses comportements . debusquer le discours juridique ne doit pas signifier le reduire a un discours exterieur ni lui faire dire ou faire ce qu'il ne dit ou ne fait pas. ii ne s'agit pas davantage de chercher derriere le discours juridique comme si l'on cherchait a soulever un voile qui cacherait la "vraie" realite, bien que ce qui est derriere le juridique serve sans doute a le comprendre dans sa pratique. nous en donnerons ici un exemple, a partir d'une realite juridique, celle du "nul n'est cense ignorer la loi", exemple qui ne se veut ni exhaustif de la question ni necessairement novateur, mais qui cherche plutot a introduire a une preoccupation plus vaste. la connaissance du juridique le code criminel canadien' 3 dit expressement que "1 ' ignorance de la loi chez une personne qui commet une infraction n'excuse pas la perpetration de cette infraction" f a-19) . c'est dire que tout individu est repute connaitre la loi. mais c'est aussi signifier que la loi ne se preoccupe de cette connaissance que chez 1 ' infracteur : chacun est un infracteur en puissance, mais la structure juridique institutionnelle n'a pas a s 'assurer de cette connaissance chez tous les individus, a priori, sans parler du fait bien connu qu'on n'enseigne pas la loi a l'ecole. certaines regies viennent limiter 1 ' appl ication de ce principe general: l'age de juvenile par example 1 'enfant alternate routes vol. 5 1982 76 de moins de sept ans ne peut "etre declare coupable a l'e'gard d'un acte ou d'une omission de sa dart" (a-12); l'enfant entre sept et quatorze ans doit etre "en etat de comprendre la nature et les consequences de sa conduite et de juger qu ' i 1 agissait mal" (a-13) , ou les cas d'alienation mentale (a-16) ou de deficience mentale (a-2) . hormis ces restrictions, le principe de la connaissance du droit est assuietti a certaines contraintes. on doit d'abord distinguer les formes de connaissance et ensuite s'assurer de la possibilite materielle, pour 4 l'individu, de connaitre. 1. les formes de connaissance la connaissance constitue bien sur un evenement factuel, mesurable. ou bien l'individu connait, ou bien il ne connait pas. cette dichotomie ne rend certes pas compte des niveaux de qualite" de la connaissance. le droit ne demande pas a l'individu de connaitre les subtilit^s, les interpretations de la loi. pourtant , on le sait, ces memes subtilites ou interpretations peuvent decider de la culpabilite ou de 1' innocence. le droit n'est-il pas d'ailleurs ainsi fait que le r£sultat d'un litige n'est jamais connu a 1 ' avance ? quoiqu'il en soit, le droit n'exige du sujet que l'effort diligent qu'il est en mesure de faire, pour connaitre les lois que le parlement adopte. a l'aide d'une situation quelque peu diff€rente, on peut decouvrir les formes de connaissance que souleve le tribunal. le code criminel prevoit a l'article 21, qu'"est partie a une infraction quiconque... b) accomplit ou omet d'accomplir quelque chose en vue d'aider quelqu'un a la commettre" (nous 77 soulignons d.s.). cet article peut etre invoque pour signifier que l'accuse aurait du, avait les moyens de connaitre la loi, et que son ignorance a permis la commission d'une infraction. r. v woolworth souleve ce point. sans entrer dans les details de l'affaire, precisons qu'une infraction a ete commise par deux individus qui avaient conclu une entente avec un magasin woolworth de toronto, pour vendre, dans le magasin, des stylos a bille, moyennant une ristourne de trente pour cent a la compagnie. condamnee en premiere instance sous pretexte, entre autres, que la compagnie "aurait du savoir" ce qui se passait dans son magasin, le tribunal d'appel rejette les motifs, recoit l'appel et casse le jugement. ii stipule dans son jugement que l'on doit distinguer entre une connaissance de fait qu'une infraction est commise, une connaissance irresdonsable ou, malgre sa connaissance, le sujet ne s'assure pas de ses fondements ni n'informe d'autres autorites competentes de cette connaissance, et finalement une connaissance constructive, ou l'individu ne savait pas mais avait la possibility, sinon le devoir, de connaitre. si les deux premieres formes relevent immediatement de la norme juridique, la troisieme, la "connaissance constructive" ne constitue tout simplement pas un cas de droit ( r. v woolworth, loc . cit.: 30) . c'est cette seule forme de connaissance qu'aurait pu avoir woolworth des delits commis sur sa propriete et le tribunal affirme ne pouvoir en tenir compte. dans le cas de la connaissance de la loi, seules les deux premieres formes existent. la connaissance de fait est une connaissance postulee chez tous les individus, sous respect alternate routes vol. 5 1982 78 des contraintes d'ordre legal. ouant 1 la connaissance irresponsable, on parlera ici d'un sujet qui, croyant qu'existe une loi, commet un acte, sans s'etre assure qu'existe cette loi, et l'enfreint ainsi. z. la connaissance rip la lni le cas de r. v catholique (1980) expl ique 1 ' element materiel de la connaissance et renferme aussi la question de la connaissance constructive. ici, un individu est condamne a la peine maximale (six semaines d' emprisonnement) , pour avoir enfreint un reolement local le ''snowdrift liquor prohibition regulations act" concernant la nossession de boissons alcoolisees sur le territoire de snowdrift aux territoires du n'ord ouest .pendant son emprisonnement , 1' individu rencontre un avocat oui lui suggere d'en apneler de la sentence. la cour d'aupel constate alors que cette legislation n'a pas ete propremer.t oubliee par le conseil leqislatif, et qu'il est, des lors, inacceptable en droit, "qu 'une personne soit condamnee, punie, et derde sa liberte personnelle par une sentence d'emprisonnement , pour avoir enfreint un reglement dont elle q n'avait ni connaissance ni avis a ce moment." ii appert clairement ici qu'un individu doit faire des efforts nomaux dour connaltre la loi, la connaissance du droit, a contrario de celie d'une infraction, est done necessairement constructive mai? jue ceci implique aussi que le legislateur s'assure que les lois sont publiees correctement et qu'une p£riode temps est accordee aux individus pour prendre connaissance de la loi .ivant qu'elle ne prenne effet. nous avons done la totality du principe: ignorantia 79 facti excusat, ignorantia juris non excusat. d'une part, le sujet ne peut construire sa connaissance de la loi que si les circonstances le lui permettent. le legislateur doit fournir au sujet la possibilite de prendre connaissance des lois: par une publication dans une gazette officielle par exemple. ce qui nous met ici en presence du sujet-etat, qui devient sujetde-droit. de plus, le suj et-individu beneficie d'une autre possibilite: s'il a fait effort diligent pour connaitre la loi, peut-on lui tenir rigueur d'une infraction commise, autrement dit, y a-t-il infraction? r. v maclean (1974) repond par la negative. dans ce cas en effet, la cour maintient que l'individu, ayant demontre sa bonne volonte, ayant tente de construire, par les canaux usuels, sa connaissance de la loi, ne peut etre accuse d'une infraction puisque depourvu de mens rea, d'inten9 v v tion coupable. cette autre exception a la regie generale ne peut etre invoquee constamment sous peine de rendre inoperant le droit, ni ne peut etre invoquee en toutes circonstances; certaines infractions ou une responsabilite generale suffit a demontrer la culpabilite ne pretent pas a une telle excuse. cette autre exception souleve ici le probleme de 1' interpretation du droittc'est par le travail interpretatif des juges que la loi devient droit, i.e. que les intentions du legislateur sont accordees aux conditions concretes de la volonte collective. autrement dit, les individus, meme connaissant une loi, peuvent commettre une infraction qui n'en sera finalement une qu ' a la loi et non au droit, en raison d'une part de leur volonte de connaitre la loi et d'autre part de 1 ' interpretation du droit. ce qui aioute force au precepte imperieux pour le alternate routes vol. 5 1982 le-islateur de divulguer ses prescriptions, c'est done dire que l'acte legislatif, s'il definit les bornes de l'interet general, ne peut , en droit commun, specifier toutes les regies et toutes les applications de ces regies qu'il adopte. le travail de la cour pourvoiera justement & ces lacunes qui n'en sont pas. et c'est dans ce travail juridique que la loi devient droit. c'est aussi dans ce travail que le sujet politique devient sujet de droit, pour utiliser le langage theorioue deja mentionne. nous verrons , 4 nartir d'un extrait d'un discours juridique, que la coherence interne de ces raisonnements logiques n'est pas de toute rigueur, que le discours apparemment evident contient sa propre opacite, et surtout que le sujet de droit n'est plus un mais multiple. les sujets du juridique le juridique parle. ii se parle k lui-meme d'abord: il definit, dans sa pratique, les conditions de sa reproduction. ii parle aux sujets: a l'etat qu'il interpelle comme son fondateur, lui rappelant aussi les bornes a respecter; aux suiets qu'il pretend souverains et qu'il limite. ii parle enfin d'un sujet: celui de l'ordre a maintenir comme ordre publique indispensable. mais ces locuteurs ne sont pas identiques. pas davantage d'ailleurs que les sujets (matieres) de 12 leurs discours. ainsi cet extrait de r. v maclean: it is true that on occasion the word legis has been substituted for juris and the maxim (ignorantia... d.s.) does apply to that kind of law, but only when the lex, i.e. the positive command of the prince or legislature, has entered into the realm of jus, i.e., the realm of legal right 81 and obligation generally. this distinction... has become obscured in common law countries by the lack of appropriate legal terminology and the consequent use of "law" for the entire field. lex becomes part of jus by promulgation and assimilation. for if an enactment is notably at odds with general notions of justice it usually suffers considerable attrition in judicial and other leeal interpretations until its rough edges have been smoothed down enough to fit into the general plan. the point of noting this however is that it again accentuates the need in justice to give publicity to an enactment ... if the subject is to be required to conform himself to it. un discours demembre les acteurs sont campes , ici, comme membres d'un seul et meme processus: d'une part les elements abstraits, lex et jus, la loi et le droit, d'autre part les sujets qui sont determines et determinants de ces elements, a savoir l'etat, le tribunal, l'individu. la loi, lex, c'est la volonte du prince, son activity legislative democratique en tant qu'elu par le peuple; la loi devrait done exprimer la volonte du peuple. le droit, jus, c'est la justice faite, c'est l'activite juridique rendue conforme a la volonte du peuple, ce "plan general" ou s'exercent les grandes idees d'egalite, de liberte. d'une certaine fa<;on, le discours pose ici le probleme de l'etre et du devoiretre. peut-on dire que "lex" est l'etre, le fait, et que "jus" est le devoir-etre? une reponse affirmative est tentante puisqu'en effet, la loi demeure un outil imparfait en face du devoir-etre, la valeur ,realise"e dans le droit. mais le devoiretre realise dans le droit devient fait, et le tribunal nous dit justement que l'activite du juge consiste a effectuer ce passage. de plus, ce devoir-etre, le jus, correspond-il vraiment a la volonte collective, aux valeurs des individus qui forment alternate routes vol. 5 1982 82 une society donnee, regie par un corps juridique donne? de meme, une volonte collective est-elle possible; de quoi s'agitil? enfin, le juridique, de par sa nature ici decrite, d'etreen-devenir, peut-il jamais etre donne? ces questions, le juridique ne les pose pas. et ces questions ne s'imposent pas, sinon justement, par leur absence. les acteurs que sont le prince, le tribunal et le sujet, le discours les isole. d'un cote, le politique qui decide pour les sujets. de 1 'autre les sujets qui sont agis dans le droitjus. au centre le juge, qui mediatise les deux poles, muni d'une sorte de super-conscience, capable de comprendre le message de prince et de connaitre la volonte du peuple que d'ailleurs le pouvoir voulait exprimer, bien que parfois gauchement si l'on peut dire. la boucle apparait: le sujet collectif, expression de la valeur, porte au pouvoir un politique qui emet des regies, transformees par le juridique pour que le sujet "s'y con forme'. premiere question: le suj.et qui elit le politique est-il le meme que celui qui doit se conformer? autrement dit, notre sujet politique egale-t-il sujet de droit? bien que d ' importance , cette question sera laissee sans reponse ici. seconde question: ce passage de la loi au droit n ' exprime-t-il qu'un probleme terminologique comme le pretend le tribunal? nous suggererons quelques responses. 1. contradictions et repression premiere possibility, le probleme ne releve que d'une question terminologique , dans le corps juridique lui-meme. mais pourquoi cette confusion, deja au moins bi-centenaire devrait-elle persister? le juge n'aurait-il pu suggerer, dans 83 le meme effort, une solution a cette navrante situation? les linguistes competents en langue anglaise feraient-ils defaut? fut-elle aussi technique et concise, cette langue doit tout de meme permettre de resoudre de telles embuches. s'il s'agit d'un probleme terminologique , nous pouvons supposer qu'il est entretenu par le droit lui-meme qui ne fait pas d'effort diligent afin de le solutionner. mais encore faudrait-il savoir pourquoi cette confusion particuliere et pas une autre est entretenue. si le droit, comme le dretend la theorie de la division des pouvois, est en relation d'independance et de collaboration tout a la fois avec le legislatif, il se trouve peut-etre la une explication. nous avons deja entame cette question. ii s'agit de tenter ici d'aller un peu plus loin. nous avons vu plus haut que, dans les differences apparentes entre le travail legislatif et le travail judiciaire se trouvent des similitudes certaines. mais il y a plus encore: il y a peut-etre le fait, comme le pretend miaille (1978: 70-87; 105-124) que le systeme juridique s'est eleve, dans l'etat, a l'epoque de l'extinction du feodal isme ,en accord avec la transformation du fief en bien economique, permettant ainsi "la privatisation de toute la vie sociale ' de sorte que "les rois purent, par la suite, donner 1' image d'un interet "public"" fl 978: 60-61) . de sorte encore que l'etat liberal a pu se specifier "sur une double separation: separation entre la societe civile et l'etat...; separation des pouvoirs dans l'etat..." (1978:87), qui ne constituent que les "figures" de l'autonomie de l'etat. figures recouvrant done en fait la nature de classes de l'etat et la cachant sous le voile juridique. ainsi, le droit alternate routes vol. 5 1982 84 et la loi seraient deux figures d'une seule realite: "law". mais alors, comment se fait-il que le droit anglais n'ait pas exige cette meme distinction et n'ait pas cree sa propre figure de style? s'agit-il des conditions historiques sur lesquelles s'est eleve l'etat anglais? ii appert pour sur que le droit de la common law et que le droit continental existent bien ... et non pas comme simples figures de style. faudraitil supposer des lors que ce sont des differences propres aux systemes iuridiques d'abord, systemes qui eux originent de conditions materielles particuli&res , qui expliquent ici l'absence et la la presence? nous sommes enclins a penser qu'avant de chercher du cote des fonctions de ce manque et de sa relation avec d'autres pratiques, il y aurait lieu de chercher d'abord a le saisir dans le juridique lui-meme. seconde possibility, le probleme n'est pas terminologique. ou bien l'habitude est tellement bien ancree, qu'on a renonce, dans la profession, a combler cette lacune. la encore, on ne repondrait qu 1 imparfaitement a la question puisque ce qui est ici en jeu c'est bien la raison de cette habitude. ou bien alors c'est que de lacune il n'y a que dans les subtilites juridiques, c'est-a-dire que lorsque le droit est confronts a lui-meme. et de fait nous assistons bien, dans ce cas-ci, a une reflexion du droit sur lui-meme: place dans une situation ou il y a erreur dans la loi, le tribunal doit eviter une erreur de droit. l'erreur de loi, c'est celle du politique, qui, par son pouvoir impositif, pour assurer la dissuasion et la conforrute, instaure a la fois une responsabi 1 i t€ legale universelle: la connaissance de la loi, et une defense contre 85 cette responsabilite , au nora de la volonte lihre. l'erreur de droit serait done de condamner un individu qui ne pouvait savoir comme dans la cause r. v catholique ou qui croyai t savoir comme dans la cause r. v maclean bafouant alors les idees generales du citoyen quant a la justice. le juriste se doit done de creer une difference, pour fins de resoudre une contradiction temporaire. d ' ou une troisieme possibility deja suggeree: il n'y a pas, comme le pretend le juge, confusion juridique ou terminologique. a contrario, il y a la une situation qui est caracteristique au droit commun, e'est-a-dire une situation qui correspond au developpement historique de la pratique juridique britannique. et avec cette pratique juridique, en elle et derriere elle, une evolution historique particuliere qui ne se resume pas a une determination en derniere instance ou autrement, mais qui possede sa propre signification. et si l'on accepte 1 'argument presente plus tot sur le role du juge comme mediateur entre le sujet-etat et le suj et-individu, ce qu'on constate ici e'est bien plus une repression par le juge de son role mediateur, ou par une inversion, le juge desoriente ce role. en effet, le juge remet le fardeau au legislateur, son collaborateur gemellaire, de faire en sorte que le sujet-individu reconnaisse le sujet-etat et se reconnaisse ensuite dans le droit (law) comme suj et-de-droit . un discours decentre ce que le juge signifie ici, explicitement , e'est son inquietude comme mediateur, devant les incongruences des deux protagonistes que sont l'etat et 1' individu. ce qu'il ne sigalternate routes vol. 5 1982 86 ni f ie das clairement, c'est la nature de ce role de mediateur. dans le premier cas , il propose un moyen de sortir de 1 ' impasse, et cree la division loi-droit. dans le second cas, il s'instaure comme centre du processus juridique, mediateur neutre, parfait interpr^te de deux ensembles de volontes. l'un ne peut aller sans l'autre. le juge ne peut se donner comme medium sans l'existence de deux poles qu'il relie. ii ne deut se donner comme exercant ce passage de la loi au droit, que comme medium neutre, sujet central. c'est done a soi-meme que s'adresse le juridique. puisqu'en effet, en s'adressant au lecislateur, comme a son double, le juriste s'adresse en ^ait au juridique comme ne pouvant en fa\t se contenir tout entier. car de meme que le droit n'est pas dans la loi mais est obtenu par un processus de transformation (et de denlacement?) que le juge appelle promulgation et assimilation, de meme, le juridique ne peut contenir tous les suiets de droit. le juridique s'adresse ainsi aux sujetsde-droit qui sont pourvus en droit d 'obi igat ions et de droits, et de ce fait, il les cree. mais il les cree de facon imparfaite et provisoire. imnarfaite tant que lex ne devient pas ius; provisoire tant que lex n'est pas connue, ou changee par le legislateur. ainsi done, cette categorie de sujet de droit que visent aussi bien le juriste que certains marxistes n'estelle pas fixe ni stable ni uniaue mais au contraire mouvante, chanqeante et multinle. celui qu'on nomme theor iauement ou i ur idiquement sujet de droit apparait rlutot multiple qu'uniiue. la boucle nui origine du sujet collectif sujet de droit pour se refermer sur lui , pose, dans sa circularite meme, des 87 sujets qui ne sont pas necessairement sujets-de-droit . le sujet politique, on l'a deja mentionne, n'egale pas de facto le sujet de droit. l'etat on le sait, peut etre hors le droit, il peut meme etre contre le droit. mais il demeure sujet de droit au moins dans certaines de ses functions. le juridique d'autre dart, se parle avons-nous dit. en ce sens, il se cree lui-meme comme sujet de ses propres transformations. et le sujet economique pourrait aussi etre mentionne. en somme, d'une sujet unique il faut bien plutot passer a une multiplicity de sujets dans le droit. ce qui par ailleurs, ne signi^ie pas que la categorie sujet de droit soit eclatee a tel point qu'elle ne permette plus de comprendre le fonctionnement du droit. ii semble au contraire que c'est bien a un processus de creation de sujets de droit que s 'affaire, entre autres, le droit, et en ce sens, 1 'analyse de la pratique juridique implique un recours a cette categorie. ii faut cependant se garder de reduire cette categorie a une expression simpliste. conclusion: l'analyse de la pratique juridique la question de jus et lex, et devoir-etre et etre, souleve done avec acuite la nature sociale du droit, sa materiality comme corps normatif formel, et son ideologie comme ensemble deja oriente, dans une certaine mesure, par une pratique discursive de classe, au sens ou se laisse percevoir le droit, e'est-a-dire comme relation sociale sp€cifique, inscrite dans une formation sociale historique, celle de la societe bourgeoise, et non pas comme simple reflet de la volonte bourgeoise. alternate routes vol. s 1982 88 a travers la categorie sujet de droit, c'est non settlement toute une pratique mais aussi toute une pratique theorique qui sont en cause. ii ne s'agit plus ici, de concevoir le juridique a travers les categories qu'il presente pour le demasquer comme une absence ou un reflet, fut-il speculaire. le juridique peut bien etre une persona (au sens grec du terme) , tout comme il instaure une "personne" juridique. mais c'est justement a travers cette personnalite qu'il faut le decouvrir et 1 ' analyser . de plus, le juridique se presente dans l'etat et dans une formation sociale donnee. mais les liens qui l'unissent a ces autres pratiques ne peuvent etre reduits a des determinismes formels. le juridique a une histoire plus lonpue que l'etat et que le caditalisme , faut-il le rappeler. faut-il souligner aussi que le juridique n'est pas soumis aux memes crises que l'etat ou que le mode de production economique. oue le juridique puisse servir certaines fonctions et, comme 18 le suggerent par exemple les auteurs d'un recent ouvrage , oarticiper dans l'etat a assurer la domination hegemonique, et en temps de crise, a s'affirmer comme le rempart de l'ordre etabli, ne saurait resumer tout le juridique. ne serait-ce ^ue parce que le juridique vehicule une pratique ideologique rart icul ierement vivace, ramifiee et £scterique, il ne se resume pas, selon nous, a quelques liens mecaniques ou expressifs . ce sont la du moins quelques principes generaux a partir jesquels nous travaillons presentement a une recherche jur la privaute au canada. la loi sur la vie privge au canada 89 loi c-l 7 6 adoptee en 1974 par le parlement canadien se situe justement au carrefour d'une pratique juridique apparemment centree sur le sujet de droit puisque son objectif est, of f iciellement , de delimiter les zones publiques et les zones privees via les pratiques policieres. l'analyse de cette loi tentera de deboucher non seulement sur une comprehension historique de la pratique juridique mais aussi sur une vision theorique plus globale de 1 ' articulation du juridique dans 1 'etat . notes 1. c'est aussi ce que soutient par example, vincent (1973: 40-41) : la societe syllanagmatique , c'est-a-dire fond6e sur la reciprocity des obligations, apparalt en realite comme une societe* de la division et de la domination dans laquelle 1 ' independance personnelle est construite sur la dependance materielle ... le droit trouve par consequent sa validite dans la f&rantie et l a defense de la separation ... au sein de la socialisation..., d'oii son caractere d'obligation opposable a tous . en ce sens il ne se confond pas immediatement avec les interets des classes dominantes tout en traduisant les valeurs profondes qui les inspirent. indispensable aux rapports sociaux capitalistes , il en est inseparable. sur le formalisme juridique inspire de pashukanis, voir aussi hirsch,1978: blanke e_t al_,1978; kinsey, 1979; et jessop,1980. 2. on nourrait citer ici presque toute la jurisprudence. contentons-nous , pour la perspective idealiste, de renvoyer 4 villey (1968; 1969), pour la perspective theologique, qui est une section de la precedente, a schwarz-lieberman (1978) et nour la perspective ''sociologique ', a poun-' (1942; 1959) et a podgorecki (1974). on en trouvera une excellente critique dans poulantzas (1965) et dans miaille (1976). 3. code criminel, s.r.c.,1970, chap. c-34, et lois connexes par l. saintonge-poitevin. montreal: wilson et lafleur, 1978. 90 4. ii s'agit en somme des deux aspects d'une definition de la connaissance . l'aspect formel, abstrait, correspond aux elements conceptuels de la connaissance: l'acte de volonte, la curiosite aussi de l'individu, entrent ici en jeu. dans l'aspect concret-materiel , ce ne sont plus les capacites volitives ou intellectuelles de l'individu que le droit evalue, mais la mater ialite des documents legaux disponibles. dans le premier cas on demandera: le sujet veut-il connaitre? et dans le second cas, le sujet peut-il connaitre? 5. cf. long v state (delaware) (1949), cite dans r. v maclean, 104 (1974) . 6. r. v f.w.woolworth co. ltd. (1974) 24 cf. aussi roper v taylor's central garage (exeter) ltd. (1951) et r. v kester (1980) entre autres. 8. r. v catholique, loc. cit , : 69, nous traduisons. cf. lim chin aik v queen (1963) , ou le juge note que la connaissance concrete d'une regie est un element essentiel de 1' intention criminelle, du princip de "mens rea". voir aussi r. v michelin tires manufacturing (canada) ltd., (1976), et r. v dry bones (1970). 9. voir aussi r. v de marco (1973), ou le iuge reintroduit la notion "d ' apparence de droit", qui signifie que la ou un individu a agi honnetement en se croyant dans le bon droit, ou ik ou l'individu croit honnetement que les faits sont legaux, il ne peut etre tenu responsable, meme si, en droit, il a illegalement agi. voir aussi r. v howson (1966). 10. cf. r. v villeneuve (1968). voir aussi long v state (delaware) in r. v maclean, loc . cit . : 105: "the reasons for disallowing it are practical considerations dictated by deterrent effects upon the administration and enforcement of the criminal law. which are deemed likely to result if it were allowed as a general defence 11. cf. miaille, op . cit . 127-158. voir aussi sala-molins l. 197-7 : 101-126 et 131-146. 12. r, v maclean, loc . cit . : 104; nous laissons en langue anglaise cette citation puisque, telle quelle, elle est au coeur de ce qui suit. 15. le terme "law" en effet est herite du droit brit annique 14. on constatera ici 1 ' importance que prendrait une analyse du sujet qui elit et du sujet qui se conforme. 13. voir entre autres poulantzas, 1978. ii ne s'agit pas ici que des etats "spe'ciaux" ou "anormaux" mais bien de situations part iculieresdans l'etat "normal". 91 16. nous renvoyons le lecteur a la these de poulantzas (1965), pour un expose detaille de cette question. 17. dujardin p., j. michel (1978), qui deplorent en premier lieu la trop longue periode "stal inienne" de 1 'economisme , "cette conception lineaire et unilateral du developpement historique concu comme entierement determine par un schema economique" (15) et qui "aboutit... a une non-analyse "( 15) du droit entre autres. cependant, il n'en reste pas moins que "la transformation du rapport economique en rapport juridique, done 1 ' occultat ion du premier sous le second, sont permises par 1 ' idee d'autonomie du suiet de droit et renvoient encore une fois aux categories politiques bourgeoises fondamentales" (22), de sorte "qu'il n'y a plus de place que pour une anthropologic economique ou le droit trouve la position qui est la sienne" (23) et que finalement "rapporter le droit a la circulation permettrait d'eclairer l'un par 1' autre" (27) en tant qu'ils sont tous deux "entremetteurs" entre le capital realisation de la valeur et le travailleur moyen de cette realisation (cf. 24-26). c'est, dans le cas du droit, poursuivent-ils , le passage incessant du suj et-de-droit a 1 'objet-de-droit du proprietaire (potentiel) a la propriete de soi-meme. ainsi 1' ideologic n'est pas "mensonge sur-ajoute au reel, mais mensonge de la realite elle-meme" (28) . et s'il faut aller plus loin, c'est a la reproduction qu'on s'adressera. en some, malgre une pretention d'eviter un mecanicisme(economiste) , les auteurs retrouvent une vieille "verite" essentialiste , celle de la "realite" sur l'ideologie, dans laquelle ils donnent a pleines pages. s'il est autorise, par la "nature des choses" (poulantzas, op „ cit.) de parler de droit bourgeois, qu'on ne lui enleve pas sa logique, sa "verite" interne. 18. hall et al 1978: chap. 2 et 7 particulierement . 92 bibliographie blanke.b., j. jurgens , h. kastendiek 1978 "on the current marxist discussion on the analysis of form and function of the bourgeois state." state and capital , holloway j., and s. picciotto, eds . london: arnold. code criminel 1978 s.r.c., 1970, chap. c-34, et lois connexes par l. saintonge-poitevin. montreal: wilson et la^leur. dujardin.p., j. michel 1978 "marx et la question du droit : raisons d'une approche et d'un detour. " pour une critique du droit : du juridique au politique , collec t i f . presses universitaires de grenoble et maspero. edelman, b 1973 le doit saisi par la photographie . paris : maspero . hall.s et al 1 _ 9"7s — policing the crisis: mugging, the state and law and order" london : macmillan . hirsch, j. 1978 "the state apparatus and social reproduction: elements of a theory of the bourgeois state." state and capital , holloway, j., s .• picciotto, eds . london: arnold. hirst, p.o. 1979 on law and ideology . atlantic highlands, new-jersey: humanities press jessop, b. 1980 "on recent marxist theories of law, the state, and juridico-political ideology." internatio nal journal of the sociology of law 8, 51 339-368. kinsey, j. 1979 "despotism and legality in national deviancy conference." capitalism and the rule of law . london: hutchinson. lim chin aik v queen 1963 1 all e.r. : 223-237 . long v state (delaware) 1949 65 a. (2d) 489, 5 terry 262. 93 miaille, m. 1976 miaille, m. 1978 pashukanis, e.b, 1978 poulantzas, n. 1965 poulantzas, n. 1978 pound, r. 1942 pound, r. 1959 r. v catholique 1980 r. v de marco 1973 r. v dry bones 1970 r. v howson 1966 r. v kester 1980 r. v maclean 1974 une introduction critique au droit paris : maspero . l'etat du droit paris : maspero . law and marxism: a general theory . edited and introduced by chris arthur , translated by b. einhorn. london: ink links nature des choses et droit . paris : pichon et durand auz i a s . l'etat, le pouvoir, le socialisms . paris: maspero. social control through law . new york: yale university press jurisprudence . st .paul (minn.) : west publishing c. 5. vol 49, c.c.c. (ad) 65-77. 13 c.c.c. (2d) 369, 22 c.r.n.s. 25! 3 c.c.c. (3d) 355, 9 d.l.r. (3d). 3 c.c.c. (3d) 348, 55 d.l.r. (2d) 582, 2 d.r. 63. 58 c.c.c. (2d) 219, 17 c.c.c. (2d) 84-107 r. v michelin tires manufacturing (canada) ltd, 1976 15 n.s.r. (2d) . r. v villeneuve 1968 1 c.c.c. (2d) 267, 2 c.r.n.s. 301 94 r. v r.w. woolworth co. ltd. 1974 18 c.c.c. (2d) 24 roper v tavlor's central garage (exeter) ltd. 1951 2 t.l.r. 284. sala-mol ins , l. 1977 la loi: de quel droit? paris : flammarion. schwartz-lieberman von wahlendorf, m.a. 1 9 " s les dimensions du droit . paris: lgdj. villey, m. 1968 la formation de la pensee juridique moderne paris : montchrestien . 1969 seize essais de philosophic du droit . paris: dalloz. vincent, j.m. 19"3 fetichisme et societe . paris: anthropos . re-thinking cultural policy: critical approaches in the era of privatization david skinner simon fraser university david c. robinson^ carleton university long established practices of cultural policy are rapidly changing throughout the world. indeed, it might not be overstating the issue to say that we are approachingthe end ofan era in which nation-states played the central role in managing the production, distribution, and consumption of cultural products. where once cultural policies were developed to serve a broadly defined 'public interest,' todaywe are witnessing the introduction ofpolicies that are primarily geared to serve private accumulation. throughout the aitire global cultural sector, the private market, not the state, is now being promoted as the preferred mode forthe allocation ofcultural resources. thus, as gamham (1992:362-363) notes, cultural products today are viewed less as a public good than as a privately appropriable commodity. what forces are underlying this dramatic shift? while researchers may debate the extent and the speed by which changes are taking place, it is generally agreed that cultural policy i s under pressure from four broad fronts : 1) technological—such as the developmait of alternative distribution systems in broadcasting; 2) economic—^the creation of a 'global market' in ^g^ alternate routes, volume 1 1, 1994 response to nsing production costs and the need to expand markets; 3) political—assaults on the intimacy of the soaal democratic state and the rise of a neo-liberal agaida; and 4) socio-cultural—demands from various constituencies for cultural mstitutions that serve not just a 'mass public,' but supply a wider range of views and tastes which respond to a 'cultural pluralism' that postmodern theorists have long stressed. these forces and pressures have been particularly evident in canada. while cultural policy was until recaitly implemented to serve a national or 'nation-building' agenda (clarkson, 1 99 1 ), contemporary state poliaes, on the contrary, appear to be contributing to the progressive destruction of national publicly-funded cultural institutions. canada's trade agreement with the united states and mexico seems to take yet more powers away form national state agencies and place them under the auspices of international regulatory bodies that are controlled by transnational businesses. the postmeech era has dramatically exposed the illusion of any univocal myth of 'nationhood' as provinces, regions, and soaal movements all vie for constitutional representation. finally, the recent emergence ofpopulist and regional politics suggests a fundamental realignment of traditional political alliances and class forces. in this climate, unifying themes traditionally employed in cultural policy—such as 'nationalism,' 'thepublic,' and even 'sovereignty' — seem to be losing their force. what arethe implications ofthese developments for those ofus working within a critical tradition of policy studies? does our current theoretical framework allow us to adequately assess these changes and confront these problems'j' or is there a need to re-think the terrain upon which our traditional lines of analysis have been drawn? if so, how do we begin to 're-theorize' cntical policy studies in light of the profound realignments that are taking place? it is clear that any answers to these questions will at best be contingent and provisional given the rapidly shifting balance of forces and political struggles currently being waged with that caveat in mind, however, it is our view that traditional frameworks do not seem able to adequately assess the skinner and robinson/rethinking cultural policy complexity of the current forces at play, nor do they offer any effective alternative model that might aid in the construction ofa more democratic and pluralistic cultural order. responses to current problems have continued to be posed in terms ofwhat we view as a simple dichotomy ofthe 'free market' versus 'state control,' a division that has long dominated much research in the area. it is our belief, on the contrary, that both the oligopolistic capitalist market and the intervaitionist welfare state threaten the development and expansion of a democratic cultural order. as critical researchers, therefore, we need to avoid the prevailing tendaicy to retreat to a 'left keynesian' or 'statist' position whereby we oid up defending the very institutions and practices that not so long ago we soundly criticized as devilish instrumaits of 'social control.' while we recognize that state intervention, often at the behest of social movements, has many positive and even 'emancipatory' baiefits, it is also the case that these interventions are limited and can even be potentially detrimental for democratic cultural expression. welfare state intervaition, inhabermas's (1987) saise, can lead to the "colonization ofthe lifeworld"—the bureaucratization and normalization of public culture that |^| undercuts community-based self-expression and solidarity. in other ways, state agencies can actively censor public expression. as keane (1991) has demonstrated inthe case ofpublic broadcasting, the democratic state can take on leviathan colours by influencing the range of media output through appointmoits, funding, the granting or with-holding of state advertising contracts, and the establishmait of 'policy guidelines. ' in our current research, we want to explore these issues by outliningthe pressures that are guiding cultural policy-making today and by suggesting alternatives that might lead toward a more democratic cultural order. while we remain absolutely convinced that state intervention in the broadly-defined 'public interest' remains an important vehicle by which boiefits can be had by a wide population, we also recognize that the state should not be the only instrumoit in this goal . in pursuing options forthe democratization ofcultural production, critical research must also look beyond the market/state dichotomy andtoward the creation of institutions within civil society, insulated alternate routes, volume 1 1, 1994 from both the market and the state, that will help ensure democratic accountability in an era of increasing conc«itrations oftransnational corporate power. the shifting tide of cultural production in canada within the federal arena, the era ofmandating cultural agencies with a nationbuilding agenda appears to be drawing to a close. while the removal of the 'national unity' clause from the cbc's mandate is perhaps the most dramatic indication of this, it is simply illustrative of a general erosion in support for a state-drivai cultural policy. in its absaice, market forces have come to dominate the allocation of cultural resources. since the early 1980s, the canadian economy has been increasingly subject to the pressures of transnational capital accumulation. these competitive pressures have radically transformed the economic landscape ofthe country as capital has shifted to take advantage of international wage differentials andnew trading opportunities. while the federal government has claimed that the cultural sector has been exempt from trade agreements, canadian media markets have nevertheless been pressured into taking on commercial and transnational flavours in the wake of these deals (mosco, 1990). drivenbythepromiseofgreatereconomiesof scale, the state, which once pursued policies that encouraged small and diverse nationally-oriented units ofproduction, has now developed polices that favour the concentration of ownership and transnational marketing opportunities. other symptoms of this regulatory shift include the market-directed expansion of new tv delivery services (such as video cassettes and cable) on an international basis, the progressive deregulation ofnational telecommunications monopolies, the 'rationalization' of cultural agencies to conform with commeraal imperatives, and the growing tendency, as reflected in new international copyright laws, to treat information and cultural resources as a pnvately appropnable commodity (schiller, 1994). the effect of these changes on policy initiatives has been dramatic in the publishing sector, for instance, the withdrawal of the postal subsidy and skinner and robinson/rethinking cultural policy the imposition ofthe goods and services tax (gst) has reinforced distribution inequities between national and transnational producers, thus erodingthe already marginal profitability of canadian book and magazme publishers. while the film industry has experienced some success with both international co-productions and hollywood branch-plant productions, national production remains underdeveloped in the face of transnational strangleholds on distribution and exhibition. as their markets fragment and revenues shnnk, radio broadcasters are turning to programming formats that minimize production costs and maximize advertising revenue at local levels. television broadcasters, threatened by direct-broadcasting satellites and the proliferation of cable channels and video cassettes, are moving to develop regional markets and patterns of ownership concentration that extract as much as possible from their economies of scale. and in the newspaper industry, plummeting readership and lost advertising revenues are forcing concentration of ownership between daily and weekly newspaper producers. accompanying these political and economic changes, the 'politics of difference' and 'place' have swept through the social fabric ofthe nation and y^ fractured the political spectrum. as the charlottetown accord defeat signalled, 'new' social movements based on regional, ethnic, racial, gender, and environmental concerns have challenged the very possibility of constructing a univocal 'national culture.' these 'new' political forces have greatly influenced the field of cultural policy. provinces and regions are seeking stronger regional representation in formulating policy. the canadian radio television and telecommunications commission (crtc), the federal regulatory broadcasting agency, has been challenged by a number of minority groups who have disagreed with recent licensing decisions. television networks are also under pressure to better balance gender and ethnic representation within programming. finally, public funding agencies are being asked to improve representation on their juries and in their granting patterns. the combination of such forces—^technological, economic, political, and socio-cultural—may be read, on one level, as the emergence of a 'new ^ alternate routes, volume 1 1, 1994 pluralism' in cultural politics. the breaking up of state monopolies and the fracturing of the 'mass' audience into segmented niches has been seen, by commentators from both the left and the right, as evidence ofan increase in consumer power and a proliferation of cultural difference and choice.^ such optimism, however, appears to be premature, if not misguided. with declining state-sponsored support ofthe cultural mdustries, oligopolistictransnational commercial interests are increasingly governing the operation of cultural production. despite the promises of a '500 channel universe,' audiaice demands and interests that are not commercially viable will continue to find it difficult to have their voices heard. challenges for the field the new directions being pursued in the structure of cultural markets bring into focus some of the difficulties that critical policy analysis faces in forwarding progressive interventions. the changes noted above raider many traditional terms of reference within the field incomplete and inadequate. thelongcherishedprinciple of 'cultural nationalism'—^the state-driven promotion of a shared and indigenous form of cultural production—appears caught betweenthedemandsofafracturedpublic andthetransnationalization of capital. as a policy-guiding creed, it appears to have been put to rest. for many critics, the response to this untimely death has been muted at best. there are many reasons for this apparent lack of mourning. in quebec, the repressive tendencies of a pan-canadian national culture have long given the idea little currency (raboy, 1 992). in english canada, mainstream critics have traditionally viewed the idea of 'cultural nationalism' with suspicion, reading within it the protection and promotion of a narrow elite culture at the expense ofconsumer sovereignty and choice (globerman, 1 983 ; woodcock, 1 985) for neo-marxists, on the other hand, the concept of nationalism has sparked little interest outside of its relationship to questions of ownership of the cultural industnes (clement, 1975; smythe, 1981). similarly, theterms 'public' and 'public interest' which havebeen atthe heart of policy debates are proving problematic. a new generation of skinner and robinson/rethinking cultural policy 'postmodernists' have argued that the 'pubhc interest' is httle more than a stand-in for the interests of white, male, urban, middle-class canadians. in creating an imagined community of the 'public,' postmodernists suggest, traditional cultural policyhas effectivelyneutralized identities and collectivities based on gender, class, and ethnicity (lee, 1992:406). finally, the concept of 'cultural sovereignty' also appears to be losing its efficacy. at thepolicy level, this principlehad been traditionally expressed in state commitments to providing the necessary infrastructure to support indigenous cultural production. policies governing telecommunications monopolies, media content regulations, and the simultaneous substitution of canadian broadcast signals over cable have been enacted and defended according to the principle of 'cultural sovereignty. ' however, the decline of the nation-building mandate coupled with newly emerging communication technologies and transnational pressures are making such interventions difficult to maintain. whiletheprinciples of 'nationalism, 'the 'public interest,' and 'cultural sovereignty' have in all cases been nghtly criticized, it is also important to |||{^ recognize the uneven and contradictory nature of such terms. despite their problems, policies enacted under these banners have also served the purpose ofproviding a rallying point around which disparate social groups have been able to coalesce their interests and demands. consequently, the collapse of such 'meta-narratives' signals important changes in the dynamics of cultural policy. if the idea of 'cultural nationalism' no longer carnes currency, ifwe can no longer speak confidently of the 'public interest,' and if the pnnciple of 'cultural sovereignty' has been eclipsed by new forces and interests, thai what analytic frames of reference are we as cntical researchers left with? some critics have faced this dilemma by retrenching and defending old principles and state forms of intervention. others have been content to abandon the field ofculture to the logic oftransnational capital accumulation. in our view neither approach will do. instead, we propose that research aimed at progressive interventions must more thoroughly engage with what bennett (1992:25) notes are "the institutional conditions which regulate different alternate routes, volume 1 1, 1994 fields of culture." this involves a recognition that policy and governmental processes informing cultural practices give rise to specific political relations that regulate access to symbolic forms. in other words, how do specific cultural policies and structures—within both the market and the state—work to systematically exclude/include particular social interests at the expaise of others. on the one hand, these exclusionary/inclusionary practices can be defined as discursive—forms of exclusion or inclusion that arise from the normative agenda embedded within particular cultural policies. for instance, how do policy distinctions between pnvate and public, commercial and nonprofit cultural institutions regulate access to cultural practices? how do such distinctions define what is legitimate and what is not? on the other hand, structural forms of exclusion and inclusion can be identified. these refer to the broad social pressures and limits that influence the production, distribution, and consumption of cultural products. in canada, such structural factors to be considered include technology, econo1^ mies of scale, market size, and ownership patterns. in the case oftechnology, for instance, little research has been done that examineshow thenew relations of technology in the cultural sector might actually influence the structure of symbolic forms and to whom they are made available (gamham, 1 990: 1 1 ). discursive and structural practices, as fields that regulate access to cultural resources, are interdependent. historically, discursive forms have impacted upon the structure of the market, and vice versa. these practices, moreover, are both enabling and constraining. pnnciples of 'nation-building,' for instance, enabled some social groups to organize to advocate forms of intervention in the name of the 'public,' yet in the process other social interests were excluded. an analysis of this kind paves the way for a renewed interrogation of how state practices structure the field of cultural production. as such, this research will allow us to propose progressive interventions aimed at expanding the cultural field to include more voices and interests. at one level, this involves, in bennett's (1992:32) terms, 'talking to' and 'working with' what skinner and robinson/rethinking cultural policy used to be pejoratively called the 'ideological state apparatus. ' rather than simply writing offthe state as a repressive instrument of control, we need to think about more strategic interventions, addressing specific cultural institutions in order to openly engage with the policy-making process. at another level, however, we need to be aware ofthe limitations of state administration, its propensities to alienate certain constituencies and 'police' cultural activities. in an era when nation-states are increasingly cedingpower to unelected transnational bodies, the political benefit of relying solely on state-sponsored cultural support is also suspect. while we cannot ignore the nation-state, we must nevertheless seek out new social spaces in which cultural practices can be developed and insulated from the tyranny of the market. theneedto find such 'spaces' i s critical giventhe rapidcommodification of contemporary culture. information and cultural products that were once readily accessible through public libraries and other institutions, are increasingly privatized and inaccessible (schiller, 1 989). in the current climate, how can we ensure that developments within the cultural industnes do not ^^ exacerbate differential access to symbolic forms? to answer this question, as melody ( 1 990 : 1 7) notes, requires that we develop a renewed defimtion ofthe 'public interest.' one potentially fruitful way to approach this, without fallingback to some repressivenormative and totalizing vision ofthe 'public, ' is to think about the kinds of cultural goods various constituencies or 'publics' need in order for their members to participate as full and active citizens within the larger community. the goal of cultural policy studies then is to think about these basic citizenship needs and to propose progressive interventions that can ensure that these needs are met. without such intervoitions, as mosco (1993:22) suggests, a great many people are in danger of becoming 'culturally-illiterate.' alternate routes, volume 11, 1994 notes 1. david robinson wishes to acknowledge the financial support provided through a doctoral fellowship award granted by the social sciences and humanities research council of canada. 2. for discusaons of the 'cultural poutics of consumption/ see mort (1989) and mcrobbie (1990). references bainett, tony 1992 "putting policy into cultural studies." in l. grossberg, c. nelson, and p treichler(eds.) cultural studies . new york; routledge; 2337. clarkson, stephen. 1991 "disjunctions: free trade and the paradox of canadian development." in d. drache and m.s. gertler (eds.) the nem era /wv ofglobal competition: state policy andmarket power. montreal ; ^^ mcgill-queen^s press; 103-125. clement, wallace. 1975 77?^ canadian corporate elite: an analysis ofeconomic power. toronto: mcclelland & stewart. gamham, nicholas. 1990 capitalism andcommunication : global culture and the economics ofinformation london: sage. gamham, nicholas. 1992 "the media and the public sphere." in c. calhoun (ed ) habermas and the public sphere. cambndge, ma: mit press; 359-376. globerman, steven. 1 983 cultural regulation in canada. montreal : institute for research in public policy. habermas, jurgen. 1987 the theory of communicative action, volume 2: lifeworld and system—a critique offunctionalist reason (trans. )t. mccarthy. boston: beacon press. skinner and robinson/rethinking cultural policy keane, john. 1991 the media and democracy . cambridge, uk: polity press. lee, benjamin. 1992 "textuality, mediation, and public discourse." in c. calhoun (ed.) habermas and the public sphere. cambridge, ma: mit press; 402-418. melody, william. 1 990 "communication policy intheglobal information economy: whither the public interest?" in m. ferguson (ed.) public communication: the new imperatives. london: sage; 16-39. mcrobbie, angela. 1990 "new times in cultural studies." new formations . (spring): 1-17. mort, frank. 1989 "the politics ofconsumption." in s. hall andm. jacques (eds.)new times: the changing face of politics in the 1990s. london: lawrence &wishart; 160-172. mosco, vincent. tfti 1990 "towards a transnational world information order: the canadaus. free trade agreement." canadianjournalofcommunication. 15 (2): 46-53. mosco, vincent. 1993 "communication, culture and power: an interview with vincent mosco." alternate routes. (10): 7-25. raboy, marc. 1992 "canadian broadcasting, canadian nationhood: two concepts, two solitudes, and great expectations." in h. holmes and d. taras {eds.)seeingourselves:mediapowerandmediapolicy in canada. toronto: harcourt, brace, javanovich; 156-173. schiller, dan. 1 994 "from culture to information and back again: commoditization as a route to knowledge." critical studies in mass communication. 11(1): 93-115. alternate routes, volume 1 1, 1994 schiller, herbert. 1989 culture inc. : the corporate takeover ofpublic expression. new york: oxford university press. smythe, dallas. 1981 dependency road: communications, capitalism, consciousness and canada. norwood, nj: ablex. woodcock, george 1 985 strange bedfellows: the state and the a rts in canada. vancouver: douglas & mclntyre. d^ on knowledge production, learning and research in struggle | 175 on knowledge production, learning and research in struggle aziz choudry1 [t]he most powerful, visionary dreams of a new society don’t come from little think tanks of smart people or out of the atomized, individualistic world of consumer capitalism, where raging against the status quo is simply the hip thing to do. revolutionary dreams erupt out of political engagement; collective social movements are incubators of new knowledge (robin kelley, 2002, p. 8). introduction in his book, freedom dreams: the black radical imagination, historian robin kelley (2002) points out that social movements generate new knowledge, questions, and theory.2 he also emphasizes the need for concrete and critical engagement with the movements confronting the problems of oppressed peoples. in this article i discuss the politics of learning, knowledge production and research “from the ground up”– that which takes place in social action/social movement contexts. while on the one hand, scholarship on social movements owes significant intellectual debts to the learning, knowledge production and theorizing which occur in the course of social struggles, on the other, the intellectual work, ideas and analysis which emerge from concrete engagement in these struggles are often overlooked and undervalued by the dominant theorizing practices of the academy. further, drawing firstly from the author’s involvement with research and activism around montreal’s 1  aziz choudry is assistant professor, international education, in the department of integrated studies in education, mcgill university (montreal, canada). he recently co-edited organize! building from the local for global justice, learning from the ground up: global perspectives on social movements and knowledge production, and fight back: workplace justice for immigrants . he can be reached at: aziz.choudry@mcgill.ca 2  an earlier draft of this paper was presented at “varieties of socialism, varieties of approaches”, organized by the critical social research collaborative (www.csrcproject. ca), carleton university, ottawa, 5 march 2011. 176 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times immigrant workers centre and wider struggles for immigration/labour justice, and secondly from global justice/anti-colonial organizing in aotearoa/new zealand and the asia-pacific region, for this discussion, this paper argues that critical scholarship should strive to be engaged concretely with social struggles and the knowledge produced in these contexts for both political and intellectual reasons. a growing interdisciplinary body of literature explores the politics and processes of knowledge production from within social movement and political activist milieus. in their article on “movement-relevant theory,” doug bevington and chris dixon (2005) note that just as few activists read social movement theory, important debates inside movement networks often do not enter the scholarly literature about social movements. they contend that social movement scholars do not have a monopoly on theory about movements. they call for recognition of existing movement-generated theory and of dynamic reciprocal engagement by theorists and movement activists in formulating, producing, refining and applying research. they hold that: “[m]ovement participants produce theory as well, although much of it may not be recognizable to conventional social movement studies. this kind of theory both ranges and traverses through multiple levels of abstraction, from everyday organizing to broad analysis” (p. 195). as flacks (2004) asserts, much social movement theory is being driven by attempts to define and refine theoretical concepts which are likely to be “irrelevant or obvious to organizers” (p. 147). kelley (2002) notes that “too often, our standards for evaluating social movements pivot around whether or not they ‘succeeded’ in realizing their visions rather than on their merits or power of the visions themselves” (p. ix). there are dominant tendencies–even among those on the left, within the university and outside–to make assumptions in relation to the relative value and significance of the location of intellectual work (in universities or in a myriad of everyday social action settings), what processes of knowledge production are recognized, and what counts as knowledge, theory or research. as alan sears (2005) puts it, deeper theoretical work is crucial, but “is not simply the property of specialized theorists with lots of formal education.” (p.151). the historian staughton lynd (2011) reminds us that “of the principal luminaries of …marxism, no onenot marx, not engels, not plekhanov, not lenin, not trotsky, not bukharin, not rosa luxemburg (who has a particular contempt for professors), not antonio gramsci, not mao-tse tung–put bread on the table by university teaching…without exception the most significant contribuon knowledge production, learning and research in struggle | 177 tions to marxist thought have come from men and women who were not academics, who passed through the university but did not remain there” (p.144). in addition, there are many located outside of universities who, as maori educationalist linda smith (1999) notes “are referred to as project workers, community activists or consultants, anything but ‘researchers’. they search and record, they select and interpret, they organize and re-present, they make claims on the basis of what they assemble. this is research” (p.17). the voices, ideas, and, indeed, theories produced by those engaged in social struggles are often ignored, rendered invisible, or overwritten with accounts by professionalized ‘experts’ or university-based intellectuals. in the realm of academic knowledge production, original, single authorship is highly valued, which can contribute to a tendency to fail to acknowledge the intellectual contributions of activism, or to recognize the lineages of ideas and theories that have been forged in struggles largely outside of universities, often incrementally, collectively, informally, and sometimes incidentally. an example of scholarly work which has explored the impact of anti-colonial struggles on an influential academic theoretical tradition is the attention that tavares (1992) and buck-morss (2009) have brought to the way in which the haitian revolution (the first and only successful slave revolution in the americas) influenced hegel’s theorizing–in particular the master-slave dialectic. marx (1984) rewrote his theory of the state under the impact of the paris commune. raya dunayevskaya (1958) points out that the spur to finishing the first volume of capital came from the revival of the british working class movement in the context of the u.s. civil war. many examples of feminist, anti-racist, and indigenous scholarship have also arisen and benefited from mass mobilizations challenging patriarchal, racist, colonial–and often capitalist–relations. yet within the university, there remains relatively little awareness of the many important debates and thinking occurring within those networks of activists, social movements, trade unions, community organizations and ngos that take more critical stances in relation to state power and capital. further, we should be aware of the importance of drawing from those who have sought to extend marx, firstly, in terms of thinkers who have emerged from, and been closely tied to anti-colonial and other left democratic struggles in the global south, such as fanon (1968), aijaz ahmad (2000), c.l.r. james (1963), and many others. how, where and in which forms social struggles take place may differ greatly from context to context and challenge some of the dominant lenses applied to 178 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times typologizing/categorizing them as both bayat (1997, 2010) and eschle (2001) remind us. in thinking through the challenges of theorizing social relations and struggles in both global south and north, himani bannerji (2011) contends that “historical and social realities of the world are neither macro-spaces of free-floating imaginaries and abstractions nor bounded within micro-formations and spaces of geographically discrete cultural identities” (p.3). equally, these diverse contexts can be important sites of knowledge production and conceptual tools for other struggles. biju mathew (2005) suggests that “[m]aybe our collective task …is to look carefully as the resurgent left social movements all across africa, asia and latin america and comprehend the ideas of justice that inhere within these movements and the historical memory they are rooted in” (203). david austin (2009) describes theory as being “congealed experience, which, in a concentrated form, can bring years of accumulated knowledge to bear on a particular issue or cause and help to prevent strategic mishaps” (p.115), while kelley (2002) also reminds us of the importance of drawing conceptual resources for contemporary struggles from critical readings of histories of older movements. theorizing social movements, ngos, community organizations and ‘civil society’ at a level which is too abstracted from the very real differences, contradictions and particularities on the ground, especially the geo-historical context, has severe limitations. as adult educationalist paula allman (2001, p.165) puts it, “our action in and on the material world is the mediation or link between our consciousness and objective reality. our consciousness develops from our active engagement with other people, nature, and the objects or processes we produce. in other words, it develops from the sensuous experiencing of reality from within the social relations in which we exist (marx and engels, 1846).” analysis of social movements need to be situated in social dynamics and concrete conditions. bannerji (2011) reminds us that “all meaningful, useful generalizations need to be shown as having a material, a social/ existential and an historical ontology. to think otherwise is to indulge in the absurdity of separating human consciousness from existing human beings and detaching both from lived time. thus micro-histories are part of history or history’s mode of existence, they are inconceivable without each other, and subjugated knowledges are the pedestals of the dominant knowledge” (p.4). thus, in order to understand social movements we need to carefully attend to the political, historical, cultural and economic forces that are at play in any one place, and explicate how they relate to the state, to capital, and to each other. the dominant strands on knowledge production, learning and research in struggle | 179 of social movement theory tend to be reductionist, eurocentric, and disconnected from the social movements and organizations that are the objects of its study. some movements are overlooked or ignored simply because they do not conform to a model or typology through which the researcher approaches the subject (eschle, 2001). inadequate attention is given to questions of geo-history, political economy, and to the politics of knowledge production, both in terms of constructing theory, and of the knowledge(s) emerging from movements. i suggest that a sounder analytical framework might draw from knowledge and theory arising from movements themselves. it would recognize the importance of “history from below” rather than seeking to only interpret movements and mobilizations solely through an imposed interpretative framework or set of variables. close attention must be paid to analyzing the trends of bureaucratization and professionalization in these movement and ngo networks. so theory is not merely created from above to be imposed on material conditions of struggle–it is also born out of practice. just as d. smith (1987, p. 80) notes “the basis for a political economy from the standpoint of labour, according to marx, is precisely that it is grounded in the work and activity of actual individuals producing their existence under definite material conditions,” so too does theory and analysis about ngo and social movement networks require such a concrete grounding in our everyday activities in the world. learning from the ground up in his work on social movements and radical adult education, john holst (2002) refers to the “pedagogy of mobilization” to describe the learning inherent in the building and maintaining of a social movement and its organizations. through participation in a social movement, people learn numerous skills and ways of thinking analytically and strategically as they struggle to understand their movement in motion…. moreover, as coalitions are formed people’s understanding of the interconnectedness of relations within a social totality become increasingly sophisticated (holst, 2002, pp. 87–88). both holst and griff foley’s (1999) work on learning in social action highlight and value the incremental learning and building of knowledge, which arises from actual and dialectical engagement in our everyday world. located in a historical materialist framework, foley’s (1999) book, learning in social action: a contribution to understanding informal education makes a vital contribution to theorizing and making explicit the 180 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times incidental learning processes arising from and contributing to engagement in a range of social struggles. foley emphasizes the importance of “developing an understanding of learning in popular struggle” (p.140). his attention to documenting, making explicit, and valuing incidental forms of learning and knowledge production in social action is in keeping with others who understand that critical consciousness, rigorous research, and theory can and do emerge from engagement in action and organizing contexts, rather than as ideas developed elsewhere by movement elites and dropped down from “above” to “the people” (smith, 1999; shragge, 2003; carroll, 2004; bevington & dixon, 2005; kelley, 2002; kinsman, 2006; newman, 2006). in doing so, foley cautions that although learning through involvement in social struggles can indeed transform power relations, it can also be contradictory and ambiguous. critical alternatives arise from struggle, active engagement, reflection and action. there remains much work to be done in thinking through what kinds of social relations, contexts and circumstances help people move from learning only to adapt to learning that supports resistance, and which can generate theoretical insights and more complex understandings about the world. for foley (1999) this involves theorizing experience, standing back from it, and reordering it, using categories like power, conflict, structure, values and choice. novelli (2010) highlights the dialectics of strategic learning through struggle and contestation which includes incidental, formal, informal, and non-formal education. this implies an engagement in “strategic analysis, which in turn leads to strategic action, and then to intended and unintended consequences of action, and to further reflection/analysis and action” (p.124). foley suggests that we need to make case studies of learning in struggle which make explanatory connections “between learning and education on the one hand, and analysis of political economy, micropolitics, ideology and discourse (or ‘discursive practices’) on the other (p.9). he highlights the importance of embracing a broad conception of education and learning, the relationship between struggle and learning, and an analytical framework which connects learning to its context. i turn now to discuss two examples of activist learning, knowledge production, research and theorizing in social action contexts to further illustrate the significance of these sites and their contributions to intellectual work. firstly, i reflect upon questions of knowledge production, research and theorizing in the context of ‘global justice’ struggles against trade and investment liberalization in networks of ngos, trade unions and social movements opposing the asia pacific economic cooperaon knowledge production, learning and research in struggle | 181 tion (apec) forum during the 1990s. secondly, i discuss aspects of the learning and knowledge production in contemporary immigrant and migrant workers’ struggles. finally, i share some critiques of ngoization which have emerged from within activist milieus engaged in struggles against global capitalism in recent decades. research, knowledge production and activism as noted earlier, social movements and activist milieux can be important sites of research which takes place outside of formal and/or professionalized research settings such as universities. effective research can help move activist practice beyond reacting only to the immediate, and inform longer-term strategy and vision. this is not to claim that all ‘activist research’ is inherently progressive or rigorous anymore than all university research can claim to be rigorous and immaculately constructed. nor is it argued that academic and activist research necessarily exist in finite, separate worlds, although sometimes this might seem to be the case. much activist research of the kind that i have engaged in involves an ongoing process of research in which information has to serve a purpose, is ongoing, and not usually channeled towards the production of one particular research output. taking the time to “get the research right” is crucial–whether in the case of adequately researching details of a meeting venue in order to mount an effective protest action, or in the more formal sense of research on a corporation, policy or practice, which, if poorly researched, can be easily, and publicly discredited by a far better-resourced protagonist and media outlets. this in turn can have serious effects on efforts to build a campaign through reaching and mobilizing a broader base of people. a central aspect of effective activist research is the relationship of trust and engagement built up with social struggles and movements. articulating or explicating activist research methodologies from our own practices (and those of colleagues) is an interesting, and perhaps challenging task which falls outside of the scope of this article. but the notion that there is some kind of natural separation between what some have called the ‘brain’ and the ‘brawn’ of movement is to be challenged since intellectual work, knowledge production, and forms of investigation/research which take place within activism are often inextricably linked to action in many mobilizations, although sometimes overlooked or unrecognized (see choudry and kuyek, forthcoming, 2012). kinsman (2006) warns: “sometimes when we talk about research and activism in the academic world we replicate distinctions 182 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times around notions of consciousness and activity that are detrimental to our objectives. we can fall back on research as being an analysis, or a particular form of consciousness, and activism as about doing things “out there”, which leads to a divorce between consciousness and practice” (p.153). in turn, we should also be wary of replicating such dynamics in activist milieux. political activist ethnography, which builds on dorothy smith’s (1987) work on institutional ethnography, offers useful tools for activist research and knowledge production. george smith (2006) suggests that for activist researchers, there is a wealth of research material and signposts derived from moments of confrontation to explore the way that power in our world is socially organized. he contends that being interrogated by insiders to a ruling regime, like a crown attorney for example, brings a researcher into direct contact with the conceptual relevancies and organizing principles of such regimes. moments of confrontation with ruling regimes were crucial to uncovering aspects of their social organization in global justice activism and research which i have been part of, before entering the university as a student, and, more recently, as faculty. during the 1990s, i was an organizer, educator and researcher for two small aotearoa/new zealand-based activist groups, gatt watchdog and the aotearoa/new zealand apec monitoring group which focused on building opposition to free trade and investment agreements, at domestic and regional (asiapacific) levels. a major focus was the asia pacific economic cooperation (apec) process that included 21 governments in the region, with a goal to advance trade and investment liberalization. apec’s highest profile event was a leaders’ summit, which rotated among apec member countries each year, and had become a target for mobilizations against neoliberal globalization. an important goal for anti-apec activism has been to delegitimize the apec forum and to expose apec governments’ claims of ‘civil society’ involvement and consultation as a sham. analysis of official texts was a key aspect of practice that informed strategy for the opposition to the hosting of apec 1999 in aotearoa/ new zealand. in 1998, well in advance of the start of new zealand’s chairing of apec the following year, i obtained a new zealand cabinet strategy committee paper “apec 1999–engagement with ngos” (new zealand government, 1998) for gatt watchdog under new zealand’s official information act (access to information act). from analyzing this document, it became evident that government intentions were to co-opt ngos and harness them to promote apec domestically, and on knowledge production, learning and research in struggle | 183 also to project to international audiences an image of a democratic government which valued differing opinions. deletions in the document clearly refer to managing the risks (militant opposition to apec), since there are several references to risk management and preparedness for “a protest element”, but gave no specific details to what this entailed, corresponding to sections that have been withheld. what remains in the document is instructive. on the positive side, the government has a real opportunity to develop a wider sense of ownership and participation. ensuring constructive participation by ngos in the apec process will be a critical part of the overall strategy of communicating the what, why and how of apec to the new zealand community. it would serve to demonstrate to the international community new zealand’s ability, as a participatory democracy, to accommodate debate and dissent among a variety of ngos… on the other hand, as the experience of chogm and the mai indicated, there is significant risk of disruption and protest at apec events. in particular we are likely to see a protest element around the leaders’ meeting in auckland in september (p.3). the document also advised that “new zealand’s chairing of apec should reflect the values of an open and participatory democracy where ngos have an opportunity freely to express their views” (p.5). “we propose a dual strategy of constructive engagement: [paragraph deleted]” and then: the target audience in this strategy is not just ngos per se, but also the wider group of “middle” new zealand who will want to see ngo voices given a fair hearing. [deletion] this will require engaging effectively with responsive groups and helping to meet, as far as possible, their own objectives of being seen to influence outcomes…the requirement for cost-effectiveness suggests there will be limits to the extent of outreach that may be possible. it will be important to avoid getting bogged down in long, resource-intensive consultations (p.6). the strategy “involves building broad support for apec and actively managing the risk of disruption” (my italics) (p.7). the new zealand government’s ngo engagement strategy paper was a clear example of a document which operates in the state’s interest in drawing up a plan to contain dissent and manage the government’s image, rather than being a background paper to inform a dialogue among equals. by its use of the term “responsive groups”, the government assumed the right to determine who was in and who was out in new zealand ‘civil society’. it also clearly sought to divide and rule ngos (and other groups) into supposedly constructive and disruptive elements. 184 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times for gatt watchdog and aotearoa/new zealand apec monitoring group activists, our reading of the document was accomplished because of our own confrontation with the government over apec, experience of being targeted by new zealand state security forces for lawful dissent against apec in 1996, involvement in previous years’ anti-apec mobilizations in several countries, and interactions with police at demonstrations and increased surveillance during 1999. having these experiences and analysis was important, but collecting, analyzing and disseminating these documents was essential to building an effective strategy to counter the government’s promotion of apec to ngo networks and community organizations. drawing from these documents, a key part of our anti-apec strategy of 1999 was to explicitly and publicly denounce the new zealand government’s apec taskforce communications strategy, and to politicize attempts to co-opt or silence critics through ‘dialogue’ in a similar fashion to that revealed in canadian official documents relating to the vancouver apec summit. this included a picket of the first dialogue on apec 1999 with ngos outside the office of the ministry of foreign affairs and trade in wellington in january 1999, and a rejection of approaches made by the official apec ngo liaison officer (hired by the new zealand government’s apec taskforce) to discuss apec matters. through media work and dissemination through ngo and community group mailings and meetings, we publicly revealed the government strategy of containment and propaganda through limited dialogue and state surveillance and harassment of the more radical critics. our strategy involved politicizing the disjuncture between stated intentions for dialogue, the calculated actual rationale expressed by the official documents obtained under the official information act, and past actual experience of state practice of criminalization of lawful dissenters who were critical of free trade and investment. after we circulated the cabinet papers to a wide range of ngos and trade unions, the government’s plan to co-opt ngos and harness them to do their work of selling apec to “middle” new zealand failed dismally, with few attending their ngo consultation sessions. the operation of the official information act, and broader questions of transparency, state power and claims of democracy became politicized in this research activism work when various government ministries either refused to divulge or release information, or insisted on imposing expensive processing fees before even considering a request. in turn, we publicized this through mainstream and independent media, finding some journalists sympathetic on this issue for their own reasons of frustration over obstacles to accessing official information, and willing to write critical articles on the matter. on knowledge production, learning and research in struggle | 185 learning and knowledge production in im/migrant workers’ struggles i turn now to focus on aspects of the politics of learning and knowledge production in migrant and immigrant workers’ struggles both in canada and in international networks. defilippis, fisher and shragge (2010) argue that for community organizations to be part of a broader longer-term movement for social change, social analysis and political education are vital. they argue that “[b]oth contribute to understanding that the specific gains made and the struggles organizations undertake are part of something larger, but so is the broader political economy that structures organizational choices” (p.177). montreal’s immigrant workers’ centre (iwc) was set up in 2000 as a community-based workers’ organization in the diverse, working-class neighbourhood of côte-des-neiges by some filipino-canadian union and former union organizers, and other activist and academic allies.3 the iwc engages in individual rights counseling and casework, as well as popular education and political campaigns that reflect the general issues facing immigrant and temporary foreign workers–dismissal, problems with employers, and sometimes inadequate representation by their unions. often these arise from individual cases and form the basis for campaigns and demands which are expressed collectively. labour education is a priority, targeting organizations in the community and increasing workers’ skills and analysis. workshops on themes such as the history of the labour movement, the labour standards act and collective organizing processes have been presented in many organizations that work with immigrants as well as at the iwc itself. for example, the “skills for change” program teaches basic computer literacy, while incorporating workplace analysis and information on labour rights and supporting individuals in becoming more active in defending those rights in their workplaces. the iwc strives to develop leadership among immigrant workers in order to take action on their own behalf. support for self-organizing, direct action, coalition-building and campaigning are used to win gains for workers and to build broader awareness of and support for systemic change in relation to their working conditions and, often, immigration status. as iwc organizer mostafa henaway (forthcoming 2012) puts it, the centre: tries to build from an organizing model that incorporates radical traditions, going back to basics, focusing on outreach, collective organizing, casework, and education. at times, there are many challenges faced in balancing all of these facets in the organization; but each facet 3  immigrant workers centre website: http://iwc-cti.ca 186 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times has proven to be critically important to the political work of the centre, such as weekly outreach outside metro [subway] stations, building relationships with both communities and individual immigrant workers, or attempts to collectivize the casework and individual issues faced by workers, and to respond in a politicized way. the foundation of this organizing has come from these principal organizing methods, in addition to a flexibility in tactics and strategy, due to ever-changing economic conditions in montreal, and globally. significantly, organizations such as the immigrant workers centre, and the workers’ struggles that they support can be key sites of informal and non-formal learning and knowledge production for labour justice struggles. this process occurs through workers’ struggles and contestation of their conditions and rights and is important in winning gains for workers. a recent study on immigrant workers’ struggles in quebec, which conducted extensive interviews (choudry et al. 2009, p. 112) notes: individuals that did eventually take action always did so with the support of others, who provided information and other resources to help them in a dispute with an employer. these others can be unions, community organizations or co-workers or friends with whom they have informal relationships. ‘street smarts’ and small victories are shared between people: this in turn encourages others to take action. such learning most often grows out of pre-existing relations with other individuals, peers or friends. however, organizations play a key role. this study found that learning to question or to resist exists in tension with learning to cope, adapt or ‘get by’–as indeed it does in workplace industrial relations since the emergence of capitalism. sometimes, as rodriguez (2010) notes, such knowledge forms contest not only the power (and knowledge) produced by governments, but also that of professionalized non-governmental organizations (ngos) which purport to speak on behalf of migrant workers. but building alliances with trade unions, through education and supporting internal debates occurring within organized labour to encourage unions to more meaningfully represent the needs and concerns of immigrant and migrant workers is an important aspect of these local and global struggles for justice. as mathew (2005) and others note, migrant and immigrant workers can and do bring their own histories of struggle and organizing strategies from their countries of origin to the new countries in which they labour. for those of us located in universities and engaged in research on im/ migrant workers this work requires some careful reflection and political commitment. commenting on the role of a growing number of ngos on knowledge production, learning and research in struggle | 187 and think-tanks which purport to represent migrant workers’ interests at national and international levels, yet exclude workers themselves, rodriguez (2010) argues that it is vital to pay attention to the knowledge production of those excluded from official venues and who cannot participate in the circuits, virtual and otherwise, frequented by others in the ‘global justice movement’. she says (p. 67), in order to be able to document the kinds of struggles engaged in by migrant worker activists…requires some level of political investment on our part as scholars, for it is in spaces outside of the seats of power, like the space of the street, where migrants can come together not only to narrate their experiences, but also to articulate radical alternatives to the contemporary global order. we must also be aware of the politics of which campaigns, organizations and movements are documented, and which are not. for, as rahila gupta (2004, p. 3) of southall black sisters, a long-established organization supporting asian and african-caribbean women against violence in britain notes, it is not easy for activists “to sit down and record their work, but in this age of information overload you need to record in order almost to prove that you exist.” indeed, for engaged academics working on immigration and labour issues, and for organizers on the frontlines of struggles for social justice, the analyses and knowledge produced in the course of such struggles can be seen as not only important intellectual contributions, but as rich conceptual resources for understanding and challenging the continued exploitation and commodification of migrant workers and immigrants, locally and internationally. the politics of activist research are inevitably impacted by challenges related to mobilizing and maintaining support, continuity and accountability among (and between) activist researchers and broader social struggles. funding and institutional recognition of movement research is not necessarily proportionate to the utility of such work, especially if it is disconnected from the task of building and supporting movements, but rather oriented towards outputs intended to influence decisionmakers in government, private sectors or international organizations. indeed, some ngo research is driven by project-centric cycles and/or compartmentalized logics that are disconnected from social struggles, and more reflective of tensions around funding priorities (petras and veltmeyer, 2001; bazan et al ., 2008). in the above examples, small activist groups which operated on a shoestring budget were able to uncover, analyze and disseminate their research through popular education and relationships with other organizations. 188 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times ngos, ngoization and the ‘global justice’ movement the past decades have seen the ascendancy of non-governmental organizations (ngos) and the widespread valorization of the notion of “civil society” at global and local levels. fowler (2000) sees a number of factors which account for the growth of ngos involved in third world development, and their increased relationships with governments and the private sector. he sees the rightwards shift in northern politics during the reagan-thatcher era as key to “the start of the rise in official finance to, and number of ngos that continues today” (p. 2). this was due to the move away from government to the market as the engine of growth and progress, and “meant more responsibility to citizens and their organizations” (ibid). although funds used to flow primarily from northern governments or financial institutions to southern governments, ngos have increasingly become channels for, and direct recipients of this ‘development assistance’ (hancock, 1989; biel, 2000; petras and veltmeyer, 2001; wallace, 2003; hewson, 2005). there has been an enormous amount of celebratory and triumphalist writing about “civil society”, and both development and advocacy ngos as being inherently “good” forces for progressive change. such claims often fail to consider who is included in and excluded from “civil society”, and pay inadequate attention to the power and role of the state, private sector and international institutions in relation to ngo/community organization milieus which, many argue, are complicit with, and dependent upon the state. even before the fiscal austerity and public sector cuts of the reagan-thatcher era, united nations conferences, increasing intergovernmental forums, agreements, treaties and negotiations had been accompanied by a parallel process of international ngo meetings, campaigns and other activity. besides the institutionalization of ngo involvement in the various arms of the united nations, the policies and statements of intergovernmental organizations such as the world bank (2008) and the asian development bank (asian development bank, 1998) and their representatives have also set parameters for which kinds of ngos will be validated by dialogue or other forms of engagement. alongside this, for many years, a number of critiques of ngos and “ngoization” have been advanced by feminist, marxist, critical race and other critical scholars. these include jad’s (2004) work on the ngoization, cooptation and undermining of the women’s movement and other parts of palestinian “civil society”, kamat’s (2002, 2004) work on the impacts of ngoization and the growth of ngos on political space and development in india and internationally, and incite! women of color on knowledge production, learning and research in struggle | 189 against violence’s (2007) recent analyses of the “non-profit industrial complex” in the americas. for petras and veltmeyer, (2005), and others, the professionalization of community-based ngos and their depoliticization works well for neoliberal regimes, keeping “the existing power structure (vis-à-vis the distribution of society’s resources) intact while promoting a degree (and a local form) of change and development” (p.20). indeed, neoliberal states have often downloaded, privatized and individualized responsibility for social welfare and ‘development’ via ngos and community organizations. in turn, if we trace the lineage of existing scholarly critiques of ngos and institutionalization/demobilization, such analyses of ngoization often owe a debt to collective forms of critical knowledge production, learning and debates emerging from within social movements and activist networks committed to progressive social change. often these tensions and critiques are raised and even worked out in practice before being subjected to academic inquiry. there is a relationship between the ngoization of social change and its impact on knowledge production, and the disciplining of dissent at national and global levels. elsewhere (choudry, 2009, 2010a, 2010b, choudry and shragge, 2011), i interrogate how, within supposedly ‘alternative’ global justice networks, a relatively small ngo elite attempts to claim positional superiority for forms of professionalized knowledge and advocacy that attempt to sideline, filter, or erase more critical positions opposed to capitalism and colonialism. while emphasizing the importance of context-specific approaches to understanding ngos and social movements, i contend that the dominant tendency of ngos is to compartmentalize the world into ‘issues,’ and ‘projects’, and the practice of an “ideology of pragmatism” (choudry, 2010b, p.20) which entails an unwillingness to name or confront capitalism. a form of colonial amnesia seems particularly entrenched in many social justice networks in settler colonial-states like aotearoa/new zealand, canada and australia. a liberal “white economic progressive nationalist” (choudry, 2010b, p.27) nostalgia underpins the framing of alternatives to neoliberalism, entailing the erasure or writing out of canada’s own ongoing colonial injustices and struggles by indigenous peoples for self-determination, and rendering invisible the historical and presentday experiences and struggles of racialized communities. these positions, which replicate, rather than challenge dominant national practices, serve to undermine and contain more critical forms of knowledge production and action in relation to confronting global capitalism. but these processes are also being challenged by ideas and mobilization strategies arising from past and present anti-imperialist and anti-colonial struggles. 190 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times in sum, even within movement networks purportedly committed to ‘global justice’, one finds hierarchies and dynamics around power and knowledge similar to that found in the academy. frequently, for example, questions of immigration, indigenous sovereignty, racism and colonialism are viewed as separate, unrelated issues by ngos and activists critical of neoliberal globalization in the north, while they are often seen as intimately connected by movements in the south (sivanandan, 1982; petras and veltmeyer, 2001; mathew, 2005). many ngos in the north and south replicate dominant approaches to hierarchies of knowledge by favouring academic, professionalized forms over learning developed in social struggles. conclusion: a call for reengagement of academics there is a danger that the conventional processes of production of academic scholarship, and assumptions or claims that such activity constitutes the apex of intellectual rigour and inquiry, can in fact overlook the complexities and dynamics of activism, and the intellectual contributions of activist practice (bevington & dixon, 2005; frampton et al., 2006). i do not imply that these various epistemologies of knowledge (academic and activist) and processes of knowledge production and learning (formal, non-formal, and informal) exist in completely separate universes. yet it seems important to consider how critically engaged scholars located in universities can avoid replicating the tendency to ignore or misconstrue forms of social action and the knowledge produced therein, because they do not fit neatly within a pre-established theoretical framework? academic work on activism and social movements requires some level of political investment on our part as scholars. it also requires an acknowledgement of the intellectual debts that many of us have to knowledge and theory arising from conversations, debates, discussions, dilemmas in the everyday worlds of organizing for social change, reconnecting with ideas and action and the importance of context/dynamics of institutionalization. if we are to play a role in creating a future in a world marked by devastating economic and ecological crises, militarized violence, war and occupation, in which canada is complicit, we need to urgently direct some thought and energy towards building social movements. we now face a period of global economic and political crisis–to be addressed by austerity measures which download the social costs onto the poor and marginalized (mcnally, 2011). we need movements to create counterpower and radical alternatives to the prevailing world order which is on knowledge production, learning and research in struggle | 191 steeped in colonialism, imperialism and war, by building upon, and in dialogue with the intellectual/conceptual resources produced in the course of social movement activism. perhaps one of the most important challenges in the early part of the 21st century for those of us who are privileged to work in universities and are committed to social justice, is to connect, reconnect, renew and ground our scholarly work with/ in continuing struggles here in canada, and around the world. and to make our work count. for, as marx (1968) noted nearly two hundred years ago, “the philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways; the point is to change it”. in theses on feuerbach (ibid), he further reminds us: “all social life is essentially practical. all mysteries which lead theory to mysticism find their rational solution in human practice and in the comprehension of this practice.” references: ahmad, a. (2000). lineages of the present: ideology and politics in contemporary south asia. london: verso. allman, p (2001). critical education against global capitalism: karl marx and revolutionary critical education. westport, ct.: bergin and garvey. asian development bank. (1998, april). cooperation between the asian development bank and nongovernment organizations. manila: asian development bank. retrieved january 20, 2008, from http://adb.org/ documents/policies/cooperation_with_ngos/default.asp?p=polici es austin, d. (2009). education and liberation. mcgill journal of education, 44(1), 107-117. bannerji, h. (2011). demography and democracy: essays on nationalism, gender and ideology. toronto: canadian scholars’ press. bayat, a. (1997). street politics: poor people’s movement’s in iran. new york: columbia university press. bayat, a. (2010). life as politics: how ordinary people change the middle east. stanford, ca: stanford university press. bazan, c., cuellar, n., gómez, i., illsley, c., monterroso, i., pardo, j., rocha, j.l., torres, p., bebbington, a j.. (2008). producing knowledge, generating alternatives? challenges to research oriented ngos in central america and mexico. in bebbington, a. j., hickey, s., and mitlin, d.c. (eds.). can ngos make a difference? the challenge of development alternatives (pp. 174-195). london and new york: zed books. bevington, d., and dixon, c. (2005). “movement-relevant theory: rethinking social movement scholarship and activism,” social movement studies 4(3), 185-208. 192 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times biel, r. (2000). the new imperialism: crisis and contradictions in north/south relations . london and new york: zed books. buck-morss, s. (2009). hegel, haiti and universal history. pittsburgh: university of pittsburgh press. carroll, w.k. (ed.). (2004). critical strategies for social research. toronto: canadian scholars’ press. choudry, a, and kapoor, d. (eds). (2010) learning from the ground up: global perspectives on social movements and knowledge production. new york: palgrave macmillan. choudry, a. (2009). challenging colonial amnesia in social justice activism. in kapoor, d (ed). education, decolonization and development: perspectives from asia, africa and the americas (pp. 95-110). rotterdam: sense. choudry, a. (2010a). what’s left? canada’s ‘global justice’ movement and colonial amnesia. race and class, 52(1), 97-102 . choudry, a. (2010b). global justice? contesting ngoization: knowledge politics and containment in antiglobalization networks. in choudry, a, and kapoor, d. (eds). (2010) learning from the ground up: global perspectives on social movements and knowledge production (pp.17-34). new york: palgrave macmillan. choudry, a. and kuyek, d. (2012, forthcoming). activist research: mapping power relations, informing struggles. in choudry, a., hanley, j., and shragge, e. (eds.). organize! building from the local for global justice . oakland: ca.:pm press. choudry, a. and shragge, e. (2011). disciplining dissent: ngos and community organizations. globalizations, 8:4, 503-517. choudry, a., hanley, j., jordan, s., shragge, e., and stiegman, m. (2009). fight back . workplace justice for immigrants. blacks point, n.s.: fernwood. defilippis, j., fisher, r., and shragge, e. (2010). contesting community: the limits and potential of local organizing. new brunswick, nj.:rutgers university press. dunayevskaya, r. (1958). marxism and freedom: from 1776 until today. new york: bookman associates. eschle, c. (2001). globalizing civil society? social movements and the challenge of global politics from below. in hamel, p., lustiger-thaler, h., nederveen pieterse, j., and roseneil, s. (eds.). globalization and social movements (pp. 61-85). basingstoke: palgrave. fanon, f. (1968). concerning violence. in the wretched of the earth (pp. 35-106). new york: grove press. foley, g. (1999). learning in social action: a contribution to understanding informal education london and new york: zed books. on knowledge production, learning and research in struggle | 193 fowler, a. f. (2000). introduction — beyond partnership: getting real about ngo relationships in the aid system. in fowler, a. f. (ed.). questioning partnership: the reality of aid and ngo relations — special issue of institute of development studies bulletin, 31 (3), 1–13. gupta, r. (2004). some recurring themes: southall black sisters 1979–2003 and still going strong. in from homebreakers to jailbreakers: southall black sisters, ed. r. gupta, pp. 1–27. london: zed books. hancock, g. (1989). lords of poverty. london: macmillan. henaway, m. (2012, forthcoming). immigrant worker organizing in a time of crisis: adapting to the new realities of class and resistance. in choudry, a., hanley, j., and shragge, e. (eds.). organize! building from the local for global justice . oakland: ca.: pm press. hewson, p. (2005). ‘it’s the politics, stupid’. how neoliberal politicians, ngos and rock stars hijacked the global justice movement at gleneagles…and how we let them. in harvie, d., milburn, k., trott, b, and watts, d. shut them down! the g8, gleneagles 2005 and the movement of movements. (pp. 135-149). leeds: dissent! and new york: autonomedia. holst, j. d. (2002). social movements, civil society, and radical adult education. westport, ct.: bergin and garvey. incite! women of color against violence. (eds.). (2007). the revolution will not be funded: beyond the non-profit industrial complex boston, ma.: south end press. jad, i. (2004), the ngo-isation of arab women’s movements. ids bulletin, 35: 34–42. james, c.l.r. (1963). the black jacobins: toussaint l’ouverture and the san domingo revolution. new york: vintage . kamat, s. (2002). development hegemony: ngos and the state in india. oxford: oxford university press. kamat, s. (2004). the privatization of public interest: theorizing ngo discourse in a neoliberal era. review of international political economy, 11 (1) (february), 155-176. kelley, r. d. g. (2002). freedom dreams: the black radical imagination. boston: beacon press. kinsman, g. (2006). “mapping social relations of struggle: activism, ethnography, social organization” in sociology for changing the world: social movements/social research, ed. frampton, c., g. kinsman, a.k. thompson, and k tilleczek. black point, n.s.: fernwood. lynd. s. (2010). from here to there: the staughton lynd reader. oakland. ca.:pm press. marx, k. (1968). theses on feuerbach. in karl marx and frederich engels: selected works. new york: international. accessed online at: http:// www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1845/theses/theses.htm 194 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times marx, k. (1984). the civil war in france: the paris commune. new york: international publishers. mcnally, d. (2011). global slump: the economics and politics of crisis and resistance. oakland, ca.: pm press. new zealand government, cabinet office. (1998, 24 august). “apec 1999. engagement with ngos”, str (98)203. newman, m. (2006). teaching defiance: stories and strategies for activist educators. san francisco, ca.: jossey-bass. novelli, m. (2010). learning to win: exploring knowledge and strategy development in anti-privatization struggles in colombia. in choudry, a, and kapoor, d. (eds.). learning from the ground up: global perspectives on social movements and knowledge production (pp. 121-137). new york: palgrave macmillan. petras, j. and veltmeyer, h. (2005). social movements and state power: argentina, brazil, bolivia, ecuador . london: pluto press. petras, j., and veltmeyer, h. (2001). globalization unmasked: imperialism in the 21st century. new delhi: madhyam. rodriguez, r.m. (2010). on the question of expertise: a critical reflection on “civil society” processes. in choudry, a, and kapoor, d. (eds.). learning from the ground up: global perspectives on social movements and knowledge production (pp. 53-68). new york: palgrave macmillan. sears, a. (2005). a good book, in theory: a guide to theoretical thinking. toronto: broadview press. shragge, e. (2003). activism and social change: lessons for community and local organizing. toronto: university of toronto press. smith, d.e. (1987). the everyday world as problematic: a feminist sociology. toronto: university of toronto press. smith, g. w. (2006). political activist as ethnographer. in sociology for changing the world: social movements/social research, ed. g. kinsman, a. k. thompson, & k. tilleczek, pp. 44–70. black point, ns: fernwood. smith, l.t. (1999). decolonising methodologies: research and indigenous peoples. london: zed books. tavares, p. (1992). hegel et haiti, ou le silence de hegel sur saintdomingue”, chemins critiques 2 (may 1992): 113-31. wallace, t. (2003). ngo dilemmas: trojan horses for global neoliberalism? in panitch, l., and leys, c. (eds.). socialist register 2004: the new imperial challenge (pp. 202-219). london: merlin. world bank. (2008, january). world bank civil society engagement newsletter. retrieved 4 february 2008, from http://web.worldbank.org/ wbsite/external/topics/cso/0,,contentmdk:216 14446~pagepk:220503~pipk:220476~thesitepk:228717,00.html on. stabilizing privatization | 85 stabilizing privatization: crisis, enabling fields, and public-private partnerships in canada — heather whiteside1 public-private partnerships (p3s) – or “cooperative ventures between the state and private business” (linder, 1999, p.35) – are now commonly used in canada to deliver public infrastructure such as hospitals, highways, water treatment facilities, and schools. however, despite their growing popularity, p3 arrangements are seldom able to provide better value for money than traditional public procurement given the higher costs associated with private financing and for-profit service delivery. problems of this sort were only further compounded during the recent global financial crisis as private financing became more expensive and difficult to secure, leading to several project delays and cancellations across the country (mackenzie, 2009). with the onset of a new round of fiscal austerity as of late, one might reasonably expect that this policy would be scrapped in favour of lower cost public procurement. instead, as of 2010, the p3 model is flourishing once again. this is particularly problematic given that these arrangements link important public services to highly volatile global financial markets and poorer value for money leads to additional unnecessary costs over the long run. the relatively quick recovery of the p3 model in the face of recent and longstanding concerns requires explanation. one obvious driver is neoliberal ideology and its dogged commitment to privatization. yet however accurate this explanation may be, on its own it is inadequate since it tells us very little about the specific policy forms that these normative commitments take. to this end, attention is paid here to the changes in public infrastructure decision-making that have occurred 1 heather whiteside is a ph.d. candidate in the department of political science at simon fraser university. she is the co-author of private affluence, public austerity: economic crisis & democratic malaise in canada (with stephen mcbride), and has published articles in journals such as studies in political economy, health sociology review, and socialist studies. 86 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism over the past decade which shore up the ideological underpinnings of privatization via p3. this is not to suggest that the normatively-based preference for p3s has disappeared, but it does point to its normalization within a public sector reoriented toward greater market dependence. this has helped to promote p3s over the long run and to stabilize their use more recently despite the growing list of drawbacks. this article makes two interrelated arguments. first, in canadian jurisdictions most enthusiastic for p3s – ontario and british columbia – p3 proliferation is encouraged through important changes within government made to capital planning procedures and bureaucratic decision-making, and new forms of institutional support for privatization. this constellation of new arrangements will be referred to here as a ‘p3 enabling field’.2 these provincial enabling fields normalize p3 use through the routinization, institutionalization, and depoliticization of this policy. routinizing p3 implementation involves the creation of infrastructure planning protocols and routines that deeply embed the language and calculus of the private for-profit sector into the heart of public policy making. institutionalizing support for p3s has been advanced through the creation of new capital planning procedures and public authorities, both of which create an air of permanency for this policy. finally, depoliticization through provincial p3 enabling fields helps to obscure the normative basis of p3 use by making it appear as though privatization is merely a pragmatic decision. depoliticization also occurs through the actual shift from public to private authority, making it both a strategy and a reality. however, given that p3 markets are vulnerable to the volatility of global finance, existing problems with the model (such as poor value for money) are exacerbated during times of crisis which can readily lead to collapsed/abandoned deals and crises of faith on the part of policy makers. this recently occurred when newly initiated projects – those in the high risk bidding or construction stages – were hard hit in 2008/9 when access to capital markets narrowed significantly. thus the second argument made here flows from the first: the subsequent stabilization and recovery of p3 use in canada after 2009 relates in large part to the routinizing, insti2 the use of this term has been inspired by, though differs from, jooste and scott’s (2012) discussion of p3 enabling fields. for them an enabling field is composed of a “network of new ‘enabling organizations’ (public, private, nonprofit)” (2012, p.151). these organizations include specialized p3 units, auditors general, private consultants, and advocacy organizations. while these actors are no doubt crucial to the maturation of p3 markets, by focusing only on organizations (essentially the ‘institutional support’ category of the enabling field as conceptualized here) their concept of an enabling field ignores legislation, capital planning frameworks, and supportive secondary reforms which are particularly important for p3s in canada. stabilizing privatization | 87 tutionalizing, and depoliticizing effects of provincial p3 enabling fields. this has led to the curious condition that p3s are now increasingly the new ‘traditional’ mode of public infrastructure procurement despite their longstanding inability to live up to the promises made by proponents.3 these arguments will be substantiated through a series of steps. first, the article discusses the (misleading) basis on which p3s are often justified in canada, and how problems with the private financing component in particular were compounded by the recent financial crisis. second, it describes the principal features of the p3 enabling fields that have been set up in ontario and bc, and examines how they routinize, institutionalize, and depoliticize privatization policy. public-private partnerships the canadian public sector is becoming increasingly reliant upon capitalist markets to deliver ‘public’ infrastructure and support services at all levels of government, and p3s are a leading way in which this occurs. p3 policy is typically passed off as a new and innovative approach to ‘alternative service delivery’ (e.g., see hodge and greve, 2005, p.7-8), as though partnering with for-profit partners is simply one innocuous option among many. however, p3s contribute to a transformation in the social relations of power, and therefore they should be more precisely understood to be a form of what david harvey (2003) calls ‘accumulation by dispossession’. reminiscent of ‘original accumulation’ as described by marx, dispossession involves the expansion of capitalist market relations in a number of ways, namely through the creation of new opportunities for profit making and by redistributing assets, thereby enhancing the breadth and depth of capitalist accumulation (harvey, 2003). this form of market expansion is achieved by incorporating into the realm of private accumulation that which has come to exist ‘outside’ of these circuits of capital (ibid). through this predatory mechanism, privatization opens up new investment and profit-making opportunities in three distinct ways. as discussed by ashman and callinicos (2006), privatization can involve commodification, recommodification, and/or state restructuring. their qualification of harvey’s argument is an important contribution as 3 this applies to hospital re/development in particular. though the numbers fluctuate over time, hospital p3s make up the majority of all p3 projects in bc and ontario, particularly with projects that cost in excess of $50 million (for up-to-date project lists see partnerships bc, n.d.; infrastructure ontario, n.d.). this has been relatively consistent over the past decade due to the strategic targeting of health care infrastructure in provincial infrastructure renewal plans. 88 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism privatization is not a homogenous process. commodification turns assets that were not previously commodities into private property which can be bought and sold in capitalist markets; recommodification converts what was once produced privately but subsequently taken over by the state back into a commodity; and restructuring creates a reliance upon private for-profit provision (ibid, p.121-123). p3s can involve commodification and/or recommodification, depending on the project, as well as state restructuring. the latter feature is of principal interest here and its key elements (routinization, institutionalization, and depoliticization) will be examined in subsequent sections.4 like other forms of privatization (e.g., selling state assets), p3s create new markets for capital through re/commodification. restructuring via p3s intensifies market dependence and awards greater authority and decision-making over public policy to private for-profit investors. sometimes labeled ‘privatization by stealth’ (e.g., cupe, 2003), p3s also allow for dispossession within potentially unprofitable or especially sensitive areas which would not otherwise be suitable candidates for more overt privatization initiatives. however, an important distinguishing characteristic of the p3 model is that while it features dispossession, state obligations to provide that particular good or service are not severed (grimsey and lewis, 2004, p.55). in other words, should the purported benefits of a p3 project fail to materialize, the public sector (i.e., taxpayer) ultimately remains on the hook. policy makers make several misleading claims to justify p3 use. transferring projects risks away from taxpayers and onto the shoulders of private partners is often touted as the central advantage of the p3 model (hodge and greve, 2005). the most common risks attributed to infrastructure projects are those relating to the site (tenure, access, suitability), design and construction (delays, weather, cost overruns), operation and maintenance (cost overruns), and financing (interest rate fluctuation, inflation). while these are indeed important concerns, the risks addressed in p3 contracts are restricted to those which can be insured against through market actors, thus excluding other forms of risk relevant to the public sector.5 for instance, this involves ignoring social concerns related to privatization (e.g., more precarious working conditions and lower quality services) and the creation of long run risk when the public sector is locked in to more 4 other aspects of p3s as accumulation by dispossession, particularly as this relates to the canadian public health care system, are addressed in whiteside, forthcoming 2013. 5 furthermore, the auditor general of ontario argues that a well-designed public procurement contract can adequately protect the public from many of these risks (especially cost overruns, delays, and design flaws). see ontario auditor general, 2008. stabilizing privatization | 89 expensive, inflexible, multi-decade p3 agreements. further, in practice risk transfer is often illusory given that private consortia build these costs into the price of their bids, and thus acceptance of risk translates into the anticipated profit margin of the private partner. this essentially cancels out public sector gains whilst the private partner is fully compensated by the state (cohn, 2004, p.8). risk transfer is a very lucrative arrangement for the private partner, with investors earning real rates of return of roughly 15-25 percent per year (gaffney et al., 1999, p.116; hodge, 2004, p.162). financial risk transfer played a large role in the justification of early p3s in canada (see loxley, 2010). these arguments rely on the belief that infrastructure ought to be funded by private firms, and financed by loans, particularly when government funds are scarce. in canada this rationale is in part ideological (i.e., the perception of public debt as a sign of mismanagement) and in part practical due to fiscal austerity. however p3s cannot actually reduce the financial obligations of the state, they are only able to mask costs since traditional infrastructure tends to be paid for upfront while p3s tend to be structured as lease arrangements, spreading payments out over time. whether or not p3s can actually deliver value for money and cost savings over the long run therefore becomes of primary concern. proponents base value for money (vfm) arguments on risk transfer as well as the neoclassical assumption that competition (in this case for the p3 contract) combined with the profit-maximizing behaviour of the private sector will result in lower overall project costs (loxley, 2010, p.2-3).6 there are a number of problems with these claims, the most important being the suggestion that private sector cost superiority will actually lead to lower public sector costs rather than being absorbed by the private partner in the form of higher profit (vining and boardman, 2008, p.15). these arguments also do not take into account social concerns produced by reducing labour costs and through a relaxation of standards (e.g., environmental, design, hiring and training). finally, claims that value for money is achieved through ‘on time’ and ‘on budget’ delivery must, of course, be confirmed through the empirical record. in canada like elsewhere many p3s have been delivered late and there have been serious cost overruns (e.g., see edwards and shaoul, 2002; mckee et al., 2006; mehra, 2005). compounding these more straightforward financial concerns is the methodological deception that occurs with vfm calculations. a central component of any vfm assessment is a comparison between the cost 6 see spronk, 2010 for a discussion of the normative assumptions used to justify privatization on the basis of ‘economic efficiency’. 90 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism of a p3 in relation to a public sector comparator (psc) – a hypothetical model created to represent the traditional delivery method. a key part of this process involves the application of a discount rate to the project costs in order to estimate the “cost of capital over time” which allows for considerations such as interest and inflation (partnerships bc, 2005, p.19). yet the choice of which discount rate to use is not a neutral decision, it is both political and controversial. the higher the discount rate, the more attractive the p3 option becomes since it favours expenditure in later years relative to that which is spent now (gaffney et al., 1999, p.117). as loxley (2012; 2010) indicates, even though there is no universally agreed upon discount rate, rates used to calculate vfm in ontario and bc are well above the uk’s best practice rate of 3.5%, often by 1-3 percent respectively. this practice makes it appear as though a p3 offers better value even in cases where cost savings fail to materialize. public-private partnerships and the 2008/9 global financial crisis many of the long-standing problems that accompany p3 projects were made even worse by the recent global financial crisis. the most obvious impact was the ratcheting up of costs associated with the private finance portion of newly initiated partnerships. prior to 2007 government borrowers in canada were able to secure interest rates that were, on average, 2 percent lower than those charged to private borrowers, but between 2007 and 2009 this increased to an average of 3 or 4 percent – making p3s nearly 70 percent more expensive than publicly funded infrastructure (when measured in present value terms) (mackenzie, 2009, p.2). transaction costs also increased as the timeframe for negotiations was lengthened due to financial market instability (drapak, 2009). this impacted p3 value for money as any unbiased assessment would have to favour the traditional procurement model on these grounds alone. along with increased costs came the implications of the credit crunch and changes in financial market dynamics. when the option to secure monoline wrapped bonds disappeared during the subprime meltdown, the main source of private financing used by p3s was suddenly eliminated.7 together these developments posed serious challenges for newly initiated projects (those that were in the bidding and construction stages) and led to a series of delays, renegotiations, and collapsed deals in 2008/9. 7 a monoline wrapped bond refers to when companies take out insurance against the risk that they will default on their debt (‘monoline’), and by using a high quality insurance group (‘wrapped’) debtors are able to secure very high credit ratings, leading to lower interest rates (see tett, 2007 for further detail). stabilizing privatization | 91 in canada the effects of the financial crisis began to show in mid-2008 and most projects that reached financial close at this time were smaller in scope and required only short term financing (canadian council for public-private partnerships [ccppp], 2009, p.1). several high profile and high cost deals also faced serious challenges during this time. with the port mann bridge p3, one of the private partners (macquarie infrastructure group) was unable to come up with the requisite $700 million and as a result the province of british columbia was forced to renegotiate the agreement in order to keep the project going (hunter, 2009). this renegotiation occurred just weeks before construction was scheduled to begin. with the fort st. john hospital p3 project, also in bc, financial market instability meant that a new private partner was needed to bailout the original private equity partner that had been contracted to finance the $268 million hospital (mackenzie, 2009, p.11). further, although the bc provincial government remained committed to actively pursuing p3 projects throughout the crisis, stimulus fund spending targeted speedier traditional infrastructure projects and decision makers suspended the requirement that p3s be first considered for all large infrastructure projects (mackenzie, 2009, p.10).8 other pro-p3 provinces faced similar problems. in ontario, for example, the niagara health systems p3 project, originally scheduled to begin construction in spring 2009, was delayed for several months when the private financing portion fell through (mackenzie, 2009, p.12). a new private financing partner then stepped in. rather than abandon p3 policy altogether, the province temporarily moved away from partnerships which relied on private financing. equally troublesome were the problems posed for operational projects. based on the assumption that projects could be refinanced periodically at projected rates, many existing p3s have secured financing for a shorter term than the life of the project. as mackenzie (2009) suggests, the rationale underpinning privately financed p3s therefore had a builtin expectation that the credit-fueled bubble would continue indefinitely. there was little prudence demonstrated despite p3-proponents often justifying partnerships on the basis of fiscal austerity, and promoters ignored the possibility of a looming financial crisis. fiscal recklessness such as this led scotland’s finance minister john swinney to label the use of private financing associated with p3s “one of the worst excesses of the age of financial irresponsibility” (fraser, 2009). 8 the requirement that p3s must be first considered for all large infrastructure projects has since been re-imposed. 92 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism crises of faith began to emerge in canada’s public sector as well. while labour unions and public service advocacy groups have long been vocal and determined opponents of p3s, the global financial crisis and its immediate aftermath also led several policy makers to publicly question their use. for instance, quebec health minister yves bolduc stated in 2009 that “p3s were not a religion” for his party (canadian union of public employees, 2009). the treasury board president, minister of transport, and minister of municipal affairs also cast doubt on the future of p3s in that province, and several proposed p3s were scrapped in favour of public procurement (ibid). altogether, the new and longstanding problems and widening opposition could have easily nurtured a movement away from the p3 model. that it has since rebounded was never inevitable, but rather the legacy of the p3 enabling fields created nearly a decade earlier. this constellation of initiatives stabilized the p3 model during the darkest days of the financial crisis and helped it subsequently recover given the reorientation of public policy and public sector decision-making that had been initiated several years earlier. p3 enabling fields in light of their troubled track record, governments seeking not to abandon p3 policy but to normalize its use have restructured and reoriented certain key elements of their public sectors. in addition to the expansion of, and enhanced public sector dependence on, capitalist markets that accompanies dispossession, p3s have also come to entail the application of private sector logic and rationale to public infrastructure and service delivery. these new rules, and the institutions that have been created to enforce and promote them, are conceptualized here as forming a ‘p3 enabling field’. over the long run, enabling fields promote dispossession through state restructuring, and on a more immediate level they help stabilize p3 policy during times of crisis – as witnessed in the wake of the 2008 global financial crisis. the p3 enabling fields set up by canada’s key p3 enthusiasts – the bc and ontario provincial governments – are composed of several crucial elements, including new capital planning frameworks, and new forms of institutional support for privatization.9 the capital planning changes relevant to these provinces are: bc’s capital asset management frame9 there are other legislative and supportive secondary reforms which have also been implemented although these contain elements unique to particular sectors (e.g., transportation and health) and therefore will not be addressed here. stabilizing privatization | 93 work (camf) and ontario’s infrastructure planning, financing and procurement framework (ipfp) and alternative financing and procurement (afp) model. new institutional support for p3s is now provided by specialized p3 units, named partnerships bc and infrastructure ontario. p3 enabling fields bc ontario capital planning frameworks camf (2002) ipfp (2004); afp (2004) institutional support partnerships bc (2002) infrastructure ontario (2005) capital planning frameworks in may 2002, the capital asset management framework (camf) was introduced in bc to serve as new “rules of the road” for public infrastructure development, governed by five best-practice principles: sound fiscal management, strong accountability, value for money, protecting the public interest, and competition and transparency (bc ministry of finance, 2002, p.1-2). the camf applies province-wide and all ministries, public sector agencies, and public organizations must now comply with these rules when seeking approval and funding for infrastructure projects. when it was first introduced, the ministry of finance made an effort to present the camf as being pragmatic, claiming that it “does not predetermine that every project will be a public-private partnership” (bc ministry of finance, 2002, p.1). the value for money camf document furthermore states that: “the framework does not assume that any one sector [public or private] is inherently more efficient in building and operating public assets. instead, it emphasizes that capital decisions will be based on a practical, project-specific assessment of a full range of options” (bc ministry of finance, n.d., p.5). yet pragmatism is more rhetorical than real since the camf also dictates that all capital project proposals in excess of $50 million must first be considered as p3s.10 cohn (2008, p.89) suggests that the camf shifts the bias away from traditional public procurement by “chang[ing] the terms of debate regarding p3s. instead of explaining why a p3 was justified, it [is now] necessary to explain why a p3 (or some other form of alternative service delivery) [is] not being employed”. less obvious but equally important are the implications of its focus on market-oriented notions of risk and the heavy emphasis placed on 10 from 2002-2008 this stipulation applied to all proposals above an even lower threshold of $20 million (since 2008 those in the $20-$50 million range are subject to a p3 screen which is used to determine whether a more comprehensive p3 evaluation should proceed) (bc ministry of finance, 2008). 94 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism identifying and valuating risk throughout the camf procedures. before a project can move beyond the initial proposal stage it is subjected to a risk-based assessment which assumes that additional responsibilities bring greater risks, and thus risk can be mitigated and minimized through partnership agreements. this creates an innate bias against public financing and ownership given that any new infrastructure project taken on by a public sector agency is assumed to generate risk. risks are then monetized and added onto publicly delivered projects, penalizing public procurement even though these risks may be entirely hypothetical. reliance upon the private sector to reduce risk also ignores the potential for cost savings that can be achieved through risk pooling (i.e., publicly financing a large number of projects), which can amount to a huge loss for the citizen and taxpayer. mackenzie’s (2007, p.iv) study of alberta p3 schools found that “for every two schools financed using the p3 model, an additional school could be built if they were all financed using conventional public sector financing.” the camf also enshrines a market-based notion of what defines the public interest. under the camf this feature of policy making is to be determined through criteria such as assessing service outcomes (mediated by monetary relations) and monitoring the performance of service providers (using market-based contracts). this is an extremely narrow conception of the public interest and does not take into consideration other concerns such as the contradiction that exists between profit-making and commercial confidentiality on the one hand, and democratic oversight and local control on the other (see wood 1995 for more on this tension). initiated in july 2004, ontario’s infrastructure planning, financing and procurement framework (ipfp) is similar to bc’s camf given that it outlines the strategies that will be used when developing (planning, building, financing and managing) new public infrastructure projects across the province. like the camf, the ipfp framework enshrines five key principles in the planning, financing, and approval of project proposals submitted by ministries, municipalities, and other public sector entities: the public interest is paramount, value for money must be demonstrated, appropriate public ownership/control must be preserved, accountability must be maintained, all processes must be fair, transparent, and efficient (ontario ministry of public infrastructure renewal [mpir], 2004, p.9). these are presented as a pragmatic, technocratic approach to infrastructure investment but there is an explicit emphasis on “innovative engagement of the private sector to leverage expertise and capital” (mpir, 2004, p.17); and p3s must be considered stabilizing privatization | 95 for all projects over $20 million. of the nine infrastructure and procurement models discussed in the ifpf, eight are p3s (mpir, 2004, p.21-22), and the public procurement option is only recommended for very minor investments (mpir, 2004, p.24). a risk-focus is present here too, as is an emphasis on value for money which incentivizes private financing and procurement. in 2003 dalton mcguinty, while campaigning for premier of ontario, vowed to scrap the province’s first p3 hospitals which had been recently initiated by his predecessor mike harris. however, not only did these particular deals go forward (although some renegotiation did take place), but attempts to depoliticize p3s were soon initiated when the newly elected mcguinty government rebranded them as ‘alternative financing and procurement’ (afp) projects. though improvements have been made when compared to how p3s were previously developed (e.g., see ontario auditor general, 2008), there is no specific legislation in place to ensure that ipfp principles are upheld and in practice afp projects are still p3s. both involve partnering with for-profit private consortia for the design, construction, financing, and operation of public infrastructure and support services. p3 industry insiders and advocates also confirm that they see no substantial difference between the p3 and afp models (e.g., see ontario standing committee on government agencies, 2008, p. 1530), as did the minister of health when initially presenting afp to the private sector (ccppp, 2005). an important feature of afp as it applies specifically to ontario’s health sector which is worth highlighting here is the 2006 decision by the ministry of health and long term care to exclude what they call ‘soft support services’ from future hospital deals (block, 2008, p.2). this means that p3 hospitals in ontario now involve only hard facility services such as maintenance, security, and operation of the physical plant but not care-related services like housekeeping, dietary, and laundry services. there is no such exemption in bc though some recent p3 hospital deals have excluded cleaning services. why exactly soft services were excluded in ontario is a multifaceted issue. the canadian union of public employees (cupe) and the ontario health coalition (ohc) claim that this was largely the result of a series of community-initiated plebiscites organized by the ohc which indicated overwhelming community support for the proposition that new hospital projects be kept fully public. a plebiscite in hamilton, for example, returned a vote of 98% in favour of this proposition (ohc, 2006). from a more cynical perspective, soft support services may have been exempted 96 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism from p3 hospital project agreements not due to community activism but instead because of the serious and ongoing problems that have resulted from their incorporation within early project agreements in that province (see ontario standing committee on public accounts, 2009, p.1340). it is therefore likely that this exemption serves two purposes: assuaging some public concerns whilst helping to make p3s run smoother in the future. by serving as both a concession offered to opponents and a pragmatic modification to the p3 model, overall this development has helped ensure the longevity of the p3 model in ontario’s public health care sector. there is also no guarantee that this exemption of soft services will be maintained in the future. new forms of institutional support new forms of institutional support for p3s are the backbone of the enabling field. the creation of specialized government agencies, or ‘p3 units’, best exemplifies this component. p3 units promote and evaluate these projects and act as repositories of knowledge which facilitates policy learning by building government expertise surrounding the complex bidding, negotiation, and operational phase of p3 projects (rachwalski and ross, 2010). the presence of these p3 units has been essential to the entrenchment of privatization within the public sector. the role of the p3 unit extends beyond the more prosaic activities outlined on their websites and in policy documents as they must translate global policy models and dispossession imperatives, ensuring that this unfolds in ways which meet local needs whilst simultaneously ensuring profitability for global investors. without the institutional support that p3 units provide, problems experienced with individual projects would not readily transform into a sophistication of the local p3 model but instead could easily lead to its abandonment. dispossession via p3s is relatively unique from other types of privatization since even though individual projects are locked in through multi-decade contracts, the model itself must be continually renewed through new projects and thus it contains a future-oriented component. this means that committed policy makers must take into consideration the long run implications of decisions made today. p3 units are currently the central way to ensure that this happens in bc and ontario. as jooste and scott (2012, p.150) put it: “the move toward private participation in infrastructure does not simply substitute private sector capacity for public sector capacity, it requires new forms of public sector capacity to be developed to overcome [p3] challenges” (emphasis added). stabilizing privatization | 97 the need for new forms of public sector capacity to facilitate dispossession was resolved in bc and ontario through the creation of crown corporations (in 2002 and 2006, respectively). this organizational form is significant given that in some countries greater political control is retained through the development of expertise and p3 unit-like roles within line departments (e.g., mission d’appui aux ppp in france and parapublica in portugal; see farrugia et al., 2008). the use of crown corporations, an arm’s length quasi-public organizational form, has a long history in canada and has been used for many different purposes ranging from economic development to cultural preservation (whiteside, 2012). yet something entirely new appears to have occurred in the past decade with p3 units: the use of crown corporations to facilitate dispossession. this occurs not through their sale but through their very existence – they are developed by the state to manage and encourage privatization in other areas of the public sector. thus the crown corporation is now being used to extend market-led restructuring in canada’s public sector. these crown corporations also help root market rules and norms within the public sector, and this is role appears to be expanding as their purview grows. with partnerships bc this expansion is both internal and external to the province. within the province, greater use of p3s means that partnerships bc has been gradually taking over the roles previously played by the bc building corporation (bcbc) (mckellar, 2006). created in 1977 to manage public sector real estate, land, and infrastructure, bcbc is thus being increasingly replaced with a commercialized crown corporation oriented toward privatization. further, as indicated in its 2011 annual report (partnerships bc, 2011), its future strategy includes diversifying its client base. this involves selling its expertise to other jurisdictions without p3 units and pushing the p3 model into new sectors within the province. the roles assigned to infrastructure ontario have also been greatly expanded over the years and it is now responsible for many different aspects of infrastructure and land development in the province: from large p3 infrastructure development and operation in 2005 to small infrastructure loans (offered to municipal borrowers only) in 2006 when it absorbed the ontario strategic infrastructure financing authority (osifa), and more recently in 2011 it took on the responsibilities of the ontario reality corporation (orc) (the manager of government owned and occupied land and buildings) (see infrastructure ontario, 2011). this has not only given infrastructure ontario a greater degree of permanence within the province but it also means that its p3-specific tasks are increasingly normalized within the day-to-day operations of government. 98 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism in order to assist jurisdictions without a p3 unit, in 2007 the federal government has also increased its commitment to p3s through the creation of ppp canada inc. as a way of promoting and assisting p3 development across the country (especially at the municipal level). once the p3 market deteriorated sharply with the financial crisis in 2008, ppp canada inc. also began to engage in ‘extensive discussions’ throughout 2008/9 with the provinces/territories, private sector stakeholders and other federal organizations to gauge the nature and extent of public sector support needed to ensure that new projects were started and that recently initiated projects reached financial close. through these efforts ppp canada determined its priority would be to help ease the “significant roadblock” to p3 projects posed by the financial crisis (ppp canada, 2009). in furtherance of its mandate to “develop the canadian market for public-private partnerships,” it has received funding commitments from the federal government of $2.8 billion per annum for 2011-2013 (ppp canada, 2009). ppp canada also teamed up with export development canada to provide surety, bonding support, and co-lending to enable troubled p3 projects to proceed (ibid). in contrast, fiscal austerity is making a comeback in most other areas of government. enabling field support cannot ultimately resolve all the problems associated with p3s but it does make them easier to implement, smoothes out and regularizes the process, and promotes privatization. and to the degree that some policy learning takes place then p3s may in fact perform slightly better – or at least appear to. the real significance of the enabling field is thus the way in which it creates a ‘common sense’ that permeates public sector processes and decision-making. this insulates the p3 model from crises through routinization, institutionalization, and depoliticization. routinization routinizing dispossession within the public sector involves the development and normalization of protocols which facilitate the selection of p3s. there are two important components here: the language of the enabling field (and an entrenchment of risk, derived through calculations of relatively short term costs and value for money, as the primary focus of decision-making) and the normalization of a market-based and market-reliant view of how the ‘public interest’ is to be conceptualized and upheld. this is accomplished not through grand overt offenses but instead through mundane, technocratic procedures. given the market-oriented nature of this form of decision-making, the language of the enabling field is part rhetoric and part reality. the rhetoric of public provision as being inherently riskier and of poorer value stabilizing privatization | 99 for money demonizes traditional projects and incentivizes privatization. for this reason p3 development remains a highly normative process as adherence to, and support for, logics of dispossession require a strong ideological commitment to privatization. however, even though the establishment of routines surrounding p3 selection may initially be normatively-based, once enabling fields are up and running normalization can proceed through its everyday routines. thus normalized and normative processes are not mutually exclusive. rhetoric is further transformed into reality when, as larner (2000, p.33) describes, discourse comes to constitute the institutions and practices of decision makers. after nearly a decade of developing most/many large infrastructure projects as p3s, and of placing an importance on particular conceptions of risk, the public interest, and value for money, the normative basis of the p3 option is shored up in ways that transcend narrow ideological dogma. self-referentiality also characterizes p3 policy as assumptions and biases are recirculated and used to justify future p3 selection. this is paradoxical given that p3s remain, on the face of it, superior only when judged against a public sector comparator (psc). yet since a psc is merely a hypothetical scenario and values alien to privatization policy (such as public provision in order to allow for collective decision-making and democratic accountability) are inherently penalized, the role of the psc is not actually that of engaging with alternatives to p3s – instead it is often a device used to mask these normative aspects through technocratic procedures. reinforcing this is the presumption that large infrastructure projects ought to be first considered as a p3. even when improvements are made to overcome past problems, p3 policy innovations (e.g., exempting some services, standardizing contracts and bidding procedures) involve moving the privatization agenda forward, not searching for public alternatives. institutionalization an important element in the shift to p3s as the new ‘traditional’ is the institutionalization of this model as the de facto standard way in which large infrastructure projects are delivered in bc and ontario (especially hospital projects). the term ‘institutionalization’ is used here to denote a number of different things. first, the root word – institution – should be taken to literally represent the creation of new public sector agencies (p3 units) which act as centres of expertise for p3 development protocols. another way to think of institutionalization is the way in which new ‘rules of the game’ are formalized through the enabling field and come to shape future decisions, connoting a new system of action and a reori100 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism entation of standards and decision-making.11 p3 units and new capital planning procedures tailored to privatization therefore lead to a change in the rules of the game, the norms of the public sector, and the social processes and actions repeated by decision-makers. an increasing permanence is also suggested by the use of the term institutionalization: these agencies and protocols are no longer expendable and temporary, but are indicative of a regulatory shift. as captured by selznick (1957, p.16-17), “institutionalization is a process… to ‘institutionalize’ is to infuse with value beyond the technical requirements of the task at hand”. when p3 development begins to shed its reliance upon external validation through reference to previous traditional methods, it begins to take on a life of its own (as the new ‘traditional’). institutionalization should therefore be conceptualized in process-based terms. in selznick’s (1957) description, institutionalization is something which happens to an organization over time but with the enabling field it is obvious that increasing permanence can also be sped up by state policy. in fact both evolution and entrenchment are visible with p3 units and the norms and procedures they embody and reproduce. this is not to say that processes relating to the evolution of the enabling field are unidirectional and heading ineluctably toward a situation where p3s are the hegemonic model for all public sector infrastructure projects. this category of institutionalization equally captures how different moments of p3 policy are crystallized (i.e., the ways in which challenges are dealt with, created, and absorbed). these challenges come from many directions: neutralizing and accommodating p3 opponents; making good on election promises (or at least appearing to – i.e., afp in ontario); dealing with the inherent problems and conflicts associated with privatization and economic crises; and adjusting to the tensions associated with marketized state restructuring. as larner (2000, p.20) suggests, “the emergence of new forms of political power does not simply involve the imposition of a new understanding on top of the old … [it] involves the complex linking of various domains of practice, is ongoingly contested, and the result is not a foregone conclusion”. in other words, p3 development and the ‘lock-in’ of the privatization model is not a foregone conclusion by any stretch; the argument being made here is that the whole purpose behind enabling fields and institutionalization is to provide for some semblance of permanency even though dispossession via p3s requires constant renewal and therefore ongoing political/ideo11 see burnham, 1999 on rules-based forms of state management and depoliticization. stabilizing privatization | 101 logical commitment. as mentioned above, efforts by cupe and the ohc to politicize p3 use in ontario’s public health care sector clearly stand out as an example of how effective, targeted resistance can lead to tangible changes in p3 policy. depoliticization depoliticizing privatization policy, or how dispossession now proceeds largely through technocratic decision-making rather than grand normative gestures, is another key implication of the p3 enabling fields in bc and ontario. peter burnham (2001, p.127) connects depoliticization to a particular governing strategy which “plac[es] at one remove the political character of decision-making”. this benefits state managers by redirecting blame and dampening expectations whilst still allowing them to retain control. more than merely rhetoric, depoliticization also relies on new bureaucratic practices and a shift from discretion-based to rules-based regimes in particular (burham, 2001, p.130-1). the routines of the new capital planning and procurement frameworks and p3 units correspond to this conceptualization. it is also suited to describing the p3 enabling field as it deals with the internal transformations that occur with state restructuring, and indicates that depoliticized decisionmaking remains simultaneously political in nature in addition to burnham’s (2001) version of depoliticization (which deals mainly with internal state restructuring) we must specifically add the privatization dimension. colin hay (2007, p.80-87) provides this in his description of three forms of depoliticization: when issues are demoted from the governmental to the public sphere, from the public sphere to the private sphere, and from the private sphere to the realm of necessity. depoliticization is therefore a process with many faces. changes that have occurred with p3s and the creation of enabling fields generally fall within the first two categories of depoliticization. most obviously it involves shifting decision-making from the public sphere into the profit-oriented private sphere. this moment captures the new authority and influence awarded to the private consortia representatives who now influence individual projects, and the private consultants, accountants, auditors which form the private technocracy that informs policy and evaluates projects. in addition, when issues are demoted from the governmental sphere to the public sphere it means that public infrastructure and service decisions are no longer primarily managed through the formal democratic arena (where decision-makers are accountable and public deliberation takes place), but instead are 102 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism shifted into the far less transparent realm of bureaucratic management (conducted by public or quasi-public agencies). this is the realm of the public technocracy and where officials become fairly insulated from public accountability (i.e., p3 units). like with routinization, depoliticization can become a reality in the sense that decisions are actually shifted into the private sphere, however it is also remains a powerful rhetorical tactic used by policy makers attempting to duck responsibility for, or reduce the visibility of, privatization. as ascoli and ranci (2002, p.14) suggest, marketization will always remain politicized since it “changes the direction in which [government] policies are developing” making it “an eminently political process, which redistributes rights and power, modifies policy networks and the institutional context in which [public] policy is made, and influences the ways in which welfare needs are defined.” furthermore, since public infrastructure delivered via a p3 remains a political responsibility (with the governmental sphere ultimately on the hook for funding, procuring, and broadly overseeing the operation of new public infrastructure and support services), this form of privatization cannot be truly depoliticized given that issues are never entirely demoted to the private sphere. conclusion routinizing, institutionalizing, and depoliticizing p3 development is an ongoing process, not a stationary state. it is increasingly ‘lockedin’ through various changes and innovations in the p3 enabling field. provincial enabling fields have become more sophisticated over time, leading to p3 project proliferation and the entrenchment of privatization particularly in the area of large infrastructure projects. since this process requires policy learning and p3 program evolution, elements of these p3 enabling fields in ontario and bc have been altered in response to market changes and community activism. however, so long as this involves changes made to how p3s proceed and not whether p3s proceed, adaptations have ultimately strengthened the model overall. nothing presented here should be taken to suggest that jurisdictions without enabling fields are not, or have not been, developing p3s. whether at the provincial or municipal level, most provinces in canada have developed at least one p3 in the past, although outside of bc and ontario these efforts have been far more sporadic. at the federal level there are also several operational p3s and the harper conservatives have implemented a p3 screen (federal funding through the building stabilizing privatization | 103 canada initiative is tied to the use of p3s) and a p3 unit (ppp canada). however, due to the constitutional division of powers, the sectors with projects most suitable for partnership agreements are mainly located within provincial jurisdiction (e.g., hospitals, schools, highways, water treatment facilities) which inherently limits the number of federal p3s. furthermore, the argument made here is not that enabling fields unequivocally force ministries and other public authorities to choose the p3 procurement model. mainly what enabling fields do, as the name would suggest, is enable p3s by simplifying processes, and encouraging, supporting and promoting their use. some items compel public authorities to consider p3s (i.e., camf and ipfp) but even these are mere frameworks which could be easily altered, transcended, or ignored if the political will to do so existed. instead it is the sheer bulk of the enabling field which acts as a form of soft lock-in by shifting the bias away from traditional public procurement. soft lock-in also helps depoliticize these activities just as p3s themselves depoliticize dispossession through technocratic decision-making. enabling fields also help p3s weather crises, whether the crisis is related to financial market volatility or a loss of faith in the model. we have recently seen this in action as routinizing and institutionalizing p3 adoption played an important role in helping to avert widespread p3 abandonment after the 2008/9 crisis. this has allowed the p3 model to retain its privileged policy position in ontario and bc, despite all of its drawbacks. changes in p3 markets and policy have nonetheless occurred over the past five years. it is likely that the global volume of annual p3 deals will not return to the heyday of 2002-7 given that this was an era of cheap credit and euphoric financialization (ccppp, 2009, p.1). concerns around debt refinancing have also led to the inclusion of clauses within ontario’s p3 hospital project agreements which stipulate that financial gains reaped through debt refinancing must now be shared with the relevant public hospital board (loxley, 2010, p.110). a reversal of some elements of privatization enabling legislation has also occurred. most notably, in 2007 the supreme court of canada sided with bc’s hospital employees union, and other health sector unions, in their fight against bc bill 29-2002 (the health and social services delivery improvement act) which unilaterally rescinded provisions in signed collective agreements and paved the way for unprecedented privatization of health care support staff in the province. this forced changes to similar unconstitutional provisions in p3-related legislation (bc bill 94-2003 the health sector 104 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism partnerships agreement act) as well. more recently, in 2011/12 the province of manitoba took an important step toward expanding protections for the public with its bill 34 (the public-private partnerships transparency and accountability act) which requires greater public consultation and involvement of officials such as the provincial auditor general and fairness monitors. these victories and initiatives help dampen the more deleterious effects of dispossession but they do not entirely counter it, nor do they root out the specific elements of privatization-driven state restructuring that have occurred over the past decade. a greater focus on p3 enabling fields would be useful for opponents as it helps to uncover the ways in which privatization by stealth proceeds through the support of even more obscure changes being made to public sector decision-making in some jurisdictions. resistance must therefore be not only directed at the outcomes of p3 use (i.e., dispossession) but also at the processes encouraging and supporting p3 selection (i.e., enabling fields). this includes politicizing the institutionalization, routinization and normalization of the market-based rationale that informs p3 policy and reorients public sector decision-making. stabilizing privatization | 105 references ascoli, u., & ranci, c. (2002). the context of new social policies in europe. in u. ascoli, & c. ranci (eds.), dilemmas of the welfare mix. ny: kluwer. ashman, s., & callinicos, a. (2006). capital accumulation and the state system. historical materialism, 14(4), 107-131. bc ministry of finance. (n.d). overview. capital asset management framework. http://www.fin.gov.bc.ca/tbs/camf_overview.pdf bc ministry of finance. (2002, may 30). new framework, agency to guide public building. news release. http://www2.news.gov.bc.ca/nrm_news_ releases/2002fin0001-000023.htm bc ministry of finance. (2008, november 7). province raises capital standard threshold for ppps. information bulletin. http://www2.news. gov.bc.ca/news_releases_2005-2009/2008fin0019-001677.htm block, s. (2008). from p3s to afp. ontario: canadian centre for policy alternatives. http://www.policyalternatives.ca/sites/default/files/ uploads/publications/ontario_office_pubs/2008/from_p3s_to_afps.pdf burnham, p. (1999). the politics of economic management in the 1990s. new political economy. 4(1), 37-54. burnham, p. (2001). new labour and the politics of depoliticization. british journal of politics & international relations, 3(2), 127-149. canadian council for public-private partnerships (ccppp). (2005). ontario infrastructure minister announces new infrastructure agency & financing method. for the record. http://www.pppcouncil.ca/pdf/ caplanftr2.pdf canadian council for public-private partnerships (ccppp). (2009). the impact of global credit retraction on the canadian ppp market. toronto: canadian council for public-private partnerships. http://www. pppcouncil.ca/pdf/credit_retraction_report_summer2009.pdf canadian union of public employees (cupe). (2003). exposing ppps. http:// cupe.ca/public-private-partnerships/exposingppps canadian union of public employees (cupe). (2009). quebec government backs away from p3s. http://cupe.ca/privatization-watch-june-09/ quebec-backs-away-from-p3s cohn, d. (2004). the public-private partnership “fetish”: moving beyond the rhetoric. revue gouvernance, 1(2), 2-24. cohn, d. (2008). british columbia’s capital asset management framework: moving from a transactional to transformative leadership on public-private partnerships, or a “railroad job”? canadian public administration, 51(1), 71-97. dimaggio, p.j., & powell, w.w. (1991). introduction. in w. w. powell, & p. j. dimaggio, (eds.) the new institutionalism in organizational analysis. chicago: university of chicago press. 106 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism drapak, f. (2009). how the financial crisis has changed the market for ppps. http://www.slideshare.net/filipdrapak/financial-crises-and-publicprivate-partnership-by-filip-drapak edwards, p., & shaoul, j. (2002). partnerships: for better, for worse? accounting, auditing & accountability journal, 16(3), 397-421. farrugia, c., reynolds, t., & orr, r. j. (2008). public-private partnership agencies: a global perspective. collaboratory for research on global projects, stanford university. working paper #39. http://crgp.stanford. edu/publications/working_papers/farrugia_etal_pppagencies_ wp0039.pdf fraser, i. (2009, april 19). john swinney slams pfi legacy. the sunday times. http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/economics/ article6122170.ece gaffney, d., pollock, a. m., price, d., & shaoul, j. (1999.) the private finance initiative. british medical journal, 319(7202), 48-51. grimsey, d., & lewis, m. k. (2004.) public private partnership. uk: edward elgar. harvey, d. (2003). the new imperialism. oxford: oxford university press. hay, c. (2007). why we hate politics. cambridge: polity press. hodge, g. (2004). risks in public-private partnerships: shifting, sharing or shirking? asia pacific journal of public administration, 26(2), 155-179. hodge, g., & greve, c. (eds). (2005). the challenge of public-private partnerships: learning from international experience. uk: edward elgar. hunter, j. (2009, january 29). province takes on larger share of toll-bridge project. globe and mail, p. s1. infrastructure ontario. (n.d.) projects. http://www.infrastructureontario.ca/ templates/projects.aspx?id=36 infrastructure ontario. (2011). 2010-2011 annual report. http:// www.infrastructureontario.ca/workarea/downloadasset. aspx?id=2147488402 jooste, s. f., & scott, w. r. (2012). the public-private partnership enabling field: evidence from three cases. administration & society, 44(2), 149182. larner, w. (2000). neoliberalism: policy, ideology, governmentality. studies in political economy, 63, 5-25. linder, s.h. (1999). coming to terms with the public-private partnership. american behavioral scientist, 43(1), 35-51. loxley, j. (2010). public service, private profits. black point: fernwood. loxley, j. (2012). public-private partnerships after the global financial crisis: ideology trumping economic reality. studies in political economy. 89, 7-37. stabilizing privatization | 107 mackenzie, h. (2007). doing the math: why p3’s for alberta schools don’t add up. alberta: canadian union of public employees. http://cupe.ca/updir/ cupe_alberta_doing_the_math.pdf mackenzie, h. (2009). bad before, worse now. ontario: hugh mackenzie and associates. http://www.cupe.bc.ca/sites/default/files/bad%20before%20 worse%20now%20_final_%20_2_.pdf mckee, m., edwards, n., & atun, r. (2006). public-private partnerships for hospitals. bulletin of the world health organization, 84(11), 890-896. mckellar, j. (2006). alternative delivery models: the special purpose corporation in canada. in o. kaganova, & j. mckellar (eds.), managing government property assets: international experiences. washington, d.c.: the urban institute press. mehra, n. (2005). flawed, failed, abandoned. ontario: ontario health coalition. http://cupe.ca/updir/flawed.failed.abandoned.p3s.pdf north, d. c. (1990). institutions, institutional change and economic performance. cambridge: cambridge university press. ontario auditor general. (2008). brampton civic hospital public-private partnership project. 2008 annual report of the auditor general of ontario. http://www.auditor.on.ca/en/reports_en/en08/303en08.pdf ontario health coalition. (2006, march 27). hamilton joins more 50,000 ontarians in saying no to privatized p3 hospitals. http://www.web. net/~ohc/hamiltons/march272006hamiltonrelease.pdf ontario ministry of public infrastructure renewal (mpir). (2004). building a better tomorrow: infrastructure planning, financing and procurement framework for ontario’s pubic sector. ontario: queen’s printer. ontario standing committee on government agencies. (2008, september 17). agency review: ontario infrastructure project corp. (infrastructure ontario). hansard committee transcripts. http://www.ontla. on.ca/web/committee-proceedings/committee_transcripts_details. do?locale=en&date=2008-09-17&parlcommid=8859&billid=&business =agency+review%3a+ontario+infrastructure+projects+corp.+%28infr astructure+ontario%29&documentid=23205 ontario standing committee on public accounts. (2009, march 25). 2008 annual report, auditor general: ministry of energy and infrastructure, ministry of health and long-term care. hansard committee transcripts. http://www.ontla.on.ca/web/committee-proceedings/ committee_transcripts_details.do?locale=en&date=2009-03-25&par lcommid=8861&billid=&business=2008+annual+report%2c+au ditor+general%3a++ministry+of+energy+and+infrastructure%2c++ministry+of+health+and+long-term+care&documentid=23744 partnerships bc. (n.d.) projects. http://www.partnershipsbc.ca/files/ projects.html 108 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism partnerships bc. (2005). project report: achieving value for money. abbotsford regional hospital and cancer centre project. victoria: partnerships bc. http:// www.partnershipsbc.ca/files_2/documents/020705_pbcabbotsford.pdf partnerships bc. (2011). 2010/2011 annual report. victoria: partnerships bc. http://www.partnershipsbc.ca/files/documents/pbc-annualreport15jun2011.pdf ppp canada. (2009). annual report 2008-2009. ottawa: ppp canada. www. p3canada.ca/_files/file/ppp-annual-report_en.pdf rachwalski, m. d., & ross, t. (2010). running a government’s p3 program: special purpose agency or line departments? journal of comparative policy analysis, 12(3), 275-298. scott, w. r. (1995). institutions and organizations. london: sage. selznick, p. (1957). leadership in administration. ny: harper & row. spronk, s. (2010). water and sanitation utilities in the global south: re-centering the debate on “efficiency”. review of radical political economics, 42(2), 156-174. tett, g. (2007, november 16). how monoline market works. financial times. http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/4465d6c8-93e5-11dc-acd00000779fd2ac.html#axzz1v8mvqfao vining, a. r., & boardman, a. e. (2008). public-private partnerships in canada: theory and evidence. canadian public administration. 51(1), 9-44. whiteside, h. (2012). crises of capital and the logic of dispossession and repossession. studies in political economy, 89, 59-78. whiteside, h. (forthcoming 2013). tarnished yet tenacious: examining the track record and future of public-private partnership hospitals in canada. in y. atasoy (ed.), global economic crisis and the politics of diversity. london & new york: palgrave macmillan. wood, e. m. (1995). democracy against capitalism: renewing historical materialism. cambridge: cambridge university press. 115 free transit and social movement infrastructure: assessing the political potential of toronto’s nascent free transit campaign rebecca schein abstract: this article examines the movement-building potential of a campaign for free and accessible public transit in the city of toronto. the campaign, launched by the newly formed “greater toronto workers’ assembly,” calls for the de-commodification of toronto’s transit system, arguing that mass transportation is a public good that should be paid for by fair taxation. the demand for free transit represents a positive, concrete anti-capitalist vision for the future of the city, which could open a space for a broader public dialogue about public goods and public control over resource allocation. the process of developing and organizing a free transit campaign will present a productive set of challenges to the newly formed assembly, pushing it to develop the relationships, skills, and internal processes necessary for nurturing a broad-based anti-capitalist movement. keywords: g20; transit; public sector; social movements; “right to the city” the demonstrations surrounding the g20 summit in toronto unfolded more or less as scripted. the state spent obscene amounts of public money to install security cameras in toronto’s streets, build an enormous fence, and augment the capacities of the local, provincial, and national police forces, both logistically and legally. demonstrators marched peacefully along a designated route through deserted downtown streets. a few people broke windows and set fire to abandoned police cars. police made full use of their brand new riot gear and special legal powers. steve paiken of tvo was shocked, shocked, to see police aggression directed at journalists and, as he put it, “middle class people” peacefully assembling. a thousand arrests. the keynesian revival: a marxian critique 116 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research denunciations of police lawlessness and brutality. calls for a public inquiry. denunciations of vandalism. calls for solidarity. and of course, the perennial lament that the voices and messages of labour and civil society were lost in the clamor. to say the events were scripted is not to say that the violence and rights violations were not serious, or that people’s anger, shock, and frustration are not real, righteous, and deeply felt. the problem with this script is that our side loses. we get bogged down in the postmortem, denouncing each other, and then denouncing the denouncers. we pour scarce resources of time and money into mobilizing for legal defense: we are literally put on the defensive. we react with renewed outrage to the predictable “over-reaction” of the state and continue to mourn the movements we should be working to build. the aftermath of the g20 summit will be an important test for a newly formed activist organization called the greater toronto workers assembly (www.workersassembly.ca). formally convened in january 2010, the assembly is comprised of individual members from a diverse array of unions, leftist political groups, and grassroots community organizations1. the assembly’s organizational culture is still very much a work in progress, and it has not yet proven its capacity to sustain over the long haul the diligent, principled non-sectarianism that it has begun to cultivate over the past year. but coming out of the g20 summit, the analysis and political ambitions that have driven the assembly’s formation seem all the more urgent and necessary. the impetus behind the assembly, as i see it, is the idea that “changing the script” will require a new form of organization, one deliberately geared to gain traction against the contours of contemporary capitalism. at a time when unions have largely stopped acting like organs of a labour movement, and when workers increasingly identify their own fate with the fate of capital (and not without reason, given the financialization of many pensions), we need an organization capable of confronting the specific ways in which neoliberalism divides, demobilizes, and demoralizes its potential opponents. since joining the workers assembly, i have often been asked about the use of the word “worker” in the organization’s name. my answer has been that the work of the assembly is to rebuild the meaning of “working class.” that meaning will not be realized by fiat, and no organizational vision statement, however comprehensive or inclusive, will generate the cultural meanings that give shape and power to political identities. to rebuild the meaning and political potency of working class identities, we need an organization that will foster sustained relationships and sustained political dialogue—not as a precursor to movement-building, but as an intrinsic feature of the movement itself. 1 for a list of members’ organizational affiliations see http://www.workersassembly.ca/links 117 in the weeks since the g20 summit, i have had many conversations debating the need for various organizations to weigh in on the question of property destruction, “diversity of tactics,” and the meaning of solidarity in the face of state repression. although i was dismayed that broken windows played their part in the g20 drama, it was hard for me to feel that a movement had been discredited, or that the messages of “legitimate protestors” had been undermined. in the absence of a movement with clear ambitions, an ostensibly tactical debate quickly becomes unmoored from strategy and devolves into a discussion of principles—principles of non-violence, solidarity, opposition to police violence, etc. as long as we are neither harnessed by the practicalities of building a mass movement nor oriented towards a vision we really believe we can win, these debates are unlikely to generate productive disagreement and dialogue on the broader left. the greater toronto workers’ assembly, however, has embarked on a project that has real potential to develop into the kind of movement in which impassioned debates over tactics will be inspiring and energizing, rather than defeatist and moralizing. at its general meeting in april, 2010, the assembly voted to dedicate significant energy to a campaign for free, fully accessible public transit in the city of toronto. many of our members have been inspired by recent efforts to elaborate the “right to the city” as a rubric organizing demands for public services and city infrastructure (harvey, 2008; world charter on the right to the city, 2004). in toronto, recent fare-hikes, strikes, provincial funding cuts, cancelled or delayed construction projects, insufficient service, piecemeal and inadequate accessibility infrastructure, and public relations debacles have made our transit system the target of considerable public anger, much of which has been channeled into generalized anti-union resentment and calls for privatization. the assembly began to see a role for itself here—not only to respond to rhetoric pitting transit riders and transit workers against each other, but to popularize an analysis of public goods and an argument for democratic control over city resources. mass transit is an essential pillar of toronto’s public infrastructure, yet its transit system is among the least “public” public systems in the world. estimated at between 70 and 80 percent, toronto’s “fare-box recovery ratio”—the percentage of the system’s operating budget paid for by individual riders at the fare-box—is among the highest in the north america and more than doubles that of some other large cities around the world (toronto environmental alliance, 2009; toronto board of trade, 2010). many other transit systems in comparable cities “recoup” less than half of their operating budgets from fares, relying more heavily on subsidies from multiple levels of government. according to the toronto board of trade (2010), “essentially no north american or european transit systems operate in [the] manner [of toronto]” with respect to transit funding. the keynesian revival: a marxian critique 118 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research riders rarely think about rising “fare-box recovery ratios,” but few have failed to notice that fares have increased from $1.10 in 1991 to $3.00 in 2010—the last fare-hike in january 2010 arriving in the context of high unemployment and rising demand for emergency food and shelter services in the city. the fare-box recovery ratio represents a rough quantification of the efficiency with which neoliberal governments have divested from the public sphere and downloaded costs to the most vulnerable individuals. the failure to invest seriously in mass transit in recent decades has meant, moreover, that many toronto residents outside the downtown core pay high fares for service that is inconvenient and inefficient. while the operating subsidies that support other transit systems reflect an understanding of mass transit as a public good, yielding benefits to entire communities and ecosystems, toronto’s system increasingly treats transit as a commodity, consumed and paid for by individual riders. the funding structure of toronto’s transit system is effectively a form of regressive taxation: although all of toronto’s residents benefit from transit infrastructure—including the car-owners who never ride a bus—our “public” system is funded disproportionately out of the pockets of the lowand middle-income people who rely on mass transportation in their daily lives. the demand for free and accessible public transit has the potential not only to develop into a broad-based movement, but also to drive the development of the new kind of organization that the assembly aspires to become. the assembly is committed to its call for the outright abolition of transit fares, not merely a fare-freeze or fare-reduction. what is exciting to me about the free transit campaign is that the expression of a radical anti-capitalist principle—the outright de-commodification of public goods and services—actually serves in this instance to invite rather than foreclose genuine political dialogue about values, tactics, and strategies. while still in its early stages, the free transit campaign is already pushing us to elaborate both analytical and strategic links between commodification, environmental justice, the limits and capacities of public sector unions, and the interlocking forms of exclusion faced by people marginalized by poverty, racism, immigration status, or disability. free transit could represent a site of convergence between many distinct activist circles in the city and foster greater integration and collaboration between environmental advocacy, anti-poverty work, and diverse human rights organizations. if the free transit campaign does succeed in bringing diverse and distinct activist cultures into conversation with each other, it will force the assembly to grapple with strategic questions about its relationship to less radical organizations in the city. given the marginalization and isolation that have long plagued leftist groups in toronto and elsewhere, this should be a welcome challenge, particularly if the assembly hopes to become an effective left pole in a broad alliance. 119 among the strengths of the free transit campaign is the concreteness of vision. within the left, efforts to elaborate a broad anti-capitalist vision too often run aground at the level of abstractions, generalities, and platitudes. most toronto residents would draw a blank if asked to “imagine a world without capitalism,” but what torontonian who has ever waited for a bus can’t begin to imagine an alternate future for the city, built on the backbone of a fully public mass transit system? the invitation to imagine free transit is an invitation for transit riders to imagine themselves not simply as consumers of a commodity, but as members of a public entitled to participate in conversations about the kind of city they want to live in. without devolving into abstract and alienating debates over the meaning of, say, socialism, the call for free transit invokes the things we value: vibrant neighbourhoods; clean air and water; participatory politics; equitable distribution of resources; public space where we are free to speak, gather, play, create, and organize. even the most skeptical response to the idea of free transit—“how will you fund it?”—is the opening of a productive conversation about taxation and control over public resources. the call for free transit can effectively open a space for an unscripted political dialogue about the meaning of fair taxation, public goods, collective priorities, and public accountability for resource allocation. but perhaps more fundamentally, the free transit campaign is a rare example of a political project on the left that is not reactive, defensive, nostalgic, or alarmist, but hopeful, proactive, and forward-looking. “crisis talk” is pervasive in much of contemporary culture, but in left circles, it has become difficult to imagine a mode of organizing that is not oriented around predicting or responding to punctuated calamities of various kinds—whether a financial meltdown, an un/natural disaster, the latest wave of layoffs and service cuts, or the systematic violation of basic civil liberties on a weekend in downtown toronto. in the case of free transit, however, we are free to move ahead with the campaign on our own timeline, to seek out and develop the kinds of relationships and democratic spaces that are necessary to sustain grassroots movements over the long term. for the assembly, this will mean having the space and time to realistically assess its own capacities and to organically develop its own strategies and priorities. the assembly does not have modest ambitions: it hopes to nurture a broadbased anti-capitalist movement and to vitalize a new working class politics (rosenfeld & fanelli, 2010; dealy, 2010). its members are, i think, tired of listening to militant rhetoric unanchored to any genuine hope of winning. the push for an excellent, fully public and accessible transit system is a radical demand with immense popular appeal, an ambitious, long-range goal for which clear, achievable interim political victories are possible along the way. free transit is not a crazy idea. arguments in favour of free transit have surfaced sporadically in toronto over the the keynesian revival: a marxian critique 120 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research years, whether in an editorial by caw economist jim stanford in the globe and mail or in a cbc interview with deborah cowen, a professor of geography at the university of toronto (stanford, 2005; cowen, 2010). some cities already have free transit systems, and many have partially free systems—in the downtown core, during holiday seasons or off-peak hours, or on “spare the air” days when smog levels are high. but in toronto there has not yet been an initiative focused on building a broad-based movement dedicated to the eventual abolition of transit fares in the name of social, economic, and environmental justice. without abandoning or compromising its radicalism, the assembly can push for concrete steps in the direction of de-commodified transit and build productive relationships with individuals and organizations who do not necessarily identify themselves as anti-capitalist. it will be in the process of pushing for interim reforms along the way to a de-commodified transit system that the assembly will most need to articulate its political principles and its analysis of the spatialization of race and class in toronto. free transit in the downtown core may, for instance, be good for toronto’s tourism industry, but will it benefit the immigrant and working class communities in transit-poor areas of the inner suburbs, who spend proportionately more of their income to access poorer quality services than those available downtown? proposals to pay for free transit through suburban road tolls will similarly hit hardest those working class communities whose neighbourhoods are so underserved by transit that they have no choice but to drive into the city for work. the process of developing interim priorities will not, in other words, postpone the challenge of articulating and popularizing a class-based and anti-racist argument for public infrastructure. instead, the assembly will be forced to pursue its most radical aspirations by cultivating a sustained dialogue about the interim remedies and strategies that will both address real needs in our communities and help build a broad-based movement over the long term. it will be through this process of dialogue, i hope, that a new articulation of a politicized working class identity might emerge. our earliest discussions of the free transit campaign are already pushing us to think about the social complexities that will need to be navigated if we are to build an effective free transit movement. success will depend on our capacity to carve out and sustain a space for dialogue and negotiation among transit workers and riders, within unions, and across neighbourhoods and communities that have been unevenly affected by fare hikes and inadequate services. questions of tactics and strategy cannot be divorced from the process of identifying, developing, and strengthening the complex connections between the people who need and use public goods and services and the workers who provide them. we will need to recognize the different ways in which our various constituencies are powerful and vulnerable and learn how to defend and 121 protect each other. the free transit campaign lends itself to the kind of intensely local organizing through which honest dialogue, trust, and long-term relationships can be developed and nurtured—within and across neighbourhoods and among transit riders and workers. and of course, without these things, the campaign will go nowhere. among the strengths of the free transit campaign is its potential to foreground and develop an analysis of our collective stake in the protection of public goods. it is not difficult to talk about public goods in the context of mass transportation infrastructure. the shared benefits of public transportation are difficult to deny, particularly in a city as large and as sprawling as toronto. even setting aside the obvious ecological imperatives that should be driving public investment in greener infrastructure, there are powerful economic reasons to support a massive re-investment in ontario’s transportation sector. a serious effort to expand the reach and accessibility of the public transit system would serve not only to ease the burden of toronto’s most vulnerable residents and reduce the economic and health costs associated with air pollution and traffic congestion: such an investment could re-direct the wasted skills and resources embodied in ontario’s laid-off auto-workers and silent auto-plants, which could be converted to the production of high efficiency mass transit vehicles. as sam gindin and leo panitch (2010) argued recently in the toronto star, public borrowing to finance such investments represents not a wasteful burden on future generations, but a commitment to securing them a future. the real squandering of our collective resources lies not in public borrowing or benefits packages for public employees, but in our failure to direct existing skills, knowledge, and material capacities into a coherent strategy for building sustainable communities. the idea of a free transit movement immediately foregrounds a number of thorny strategic questions for the left in toronto: how to build trust, dialogue, and support for a free transit movement within the transit union; how to address and re-focus the widespread anger, mistrust, and resentment directed at the public sector in the current climate; how to sustain and advance anti-capitalist principles while building productive relationships within broader progressive milieux. navigating these questions will be challenging, and the assembly is still a long way from a coherent and systematic approach to answering them. but the fact that these questions surface so quickly and urgently is a positive sign of the ambition and seriousness with which the assembly is approaching the organization of a free transit movement. the free transit campaign will push the assembly to develop further its internal organizational and decision-making capacities, but it will also demand an outward-looking, inclusive process, in which the assembly’s role is to open space for debate, dialogue, and collective strategizing. the keynesian revival: a marxian critique 122 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research in fact, the transit system itself can provide the venue for us to stage public discussions about our collective resources and to share alternative visions for our city: the transit system is a readymade classroom, theatre, and art gallery, attended every day by people who could come to recognize their stake in the de-commodification of public goods of many kinds. my hope is that toronto’s buses, streetcars, and subway platforms could be places for experimentation, places to develop the new tactics, organizing skills, and relationships that might permit us to really depart from the prevailing script. references dealy w. (2010). the greater toronto workers’ assembly: building a space of solidarity, resistance, change. relay, 30, 27-28. gindin s, and l. panitch. public sector austerity unreasonable and irrational. toronto star. retrieved on august 25, 2010 from, http://www.thestar.com/opinion/editorialopinion/ article/837616--public-sector-austerity-unreasonable-and-irrational. greater toronto workers assembly. retrieved on september 9, 2010 from, www.workersassembly.ca harvey d. (2008). the right to the city. new left review. 53, 23-40. rosenfeld h, and c. fanelli. (2010). a new type of political organization? the greater toronto workers assembly. mr zine: a project of the monthly review foundation. retrieved on august 23, 2010 from, http://mrzine.monthlyreview.org/2010/rf050810.html. stanford j. (2005). free public transit on the dirty brown horizon? the globe and mail. retrieved on august 12, 2010 from, http://freepublictransit.org/jim_stanford.php. toronto board of trade. (2010). the move ahead: funding ‘the big move’. retrieved on september 12, 2010from, http://www.bot.com/am/template.cfm?section=growing_the_ economy&template=/cm/contentdisplay.cfm&contentid=4702. toronto environmental alliance. (2009). transit commission briefing note ttc operating budget 2010: fare increase. retrieved on september 8, 2010 from, http://www.torontoenvironment. org/campaigns/transit/fareincrease2010. transit funding challenges for toronto’s communities -interview with deb cowen. metro morning. canada: canadian broadcasting corporation march 29, 2010: runtime 8:03; http:// www.cbc.ca/metromorning/2010/03/transit-funding-challenges-for-torontos-communitiesruns-803.html world charter on the right to the city. (2004). social forum of the americas, quito, ecuador. retrieved on september 12, 2010 from, http://v1.dpi.org/lang-en/events/details.php?page=124. 326 | climate change and its discontents book review josé carlos mariátegui: an anthology by harry e. vanden and marc becker, editors and translators. new york, ny: monthly review press, 2011. $29.95 us, paper. isbn: 978-1-58367245-7. pages: 1-480. matthew hawkins1 carleton university josé carlos mariátegui, the noted peruvian marxist activist and intellectual, wrote in 1925 that “each era wishes to have its own sense of the world” (p.386-387). to create a ‘sense of the world’ – achieved through a contextual and historical analysis of the contemporary reality – for mariátegui is the opening for transforming the dominant social relations. harry e. vanden and marc becker in their introduction to the anthology put forward mariátegui as an important non-dogmatic marxist thinker worth our attention amidst unfolding global political and economic crises. as a major influence on latin american heterodox approaches to marxism as well as other critical intellectual trends including decolonialist, dependency, and liberation theology perspectives, mariátegui has been an important reference for many movements and political actors from the region in their challenges to neoliberalism and global capitalism. mariategui’s seven interpretive essays on peruvian reality (first published as a collection in 1928), representing one of the first comprehensive marxist text from a latin american perspective, is an examination of the racial and class relations and the underlying vestiges of colonial feudalism in peru’s political economy. beyond this publication, much of mariátegui’s writing appears in the form of short articles and essays that were printed in newspapers and popular critical journals, as well as printed discourses to unions and political organizations. many of these texts, rarely translated into english, provide the basis for much of this anthology. mariátegui was born on june 14th, 1894 in moquegua, peru, a small southern provincial capital, and raised in a working-class household by his single-mother. he began a career in journalism at the lima news1 matthew hawkins is a phd candidate at the department of sociology and anthropology, carleton university. book review: josé carlos mariátegui | 327 paper la prensa where he eventually began writing on high society, literature and art. in 1919, mariátegui and césar falcón founded the political paper la razon. both falcón and mariátegui were exiled to europe by the military government of augusto leguía in october 1919 for their radical and critical viewpoints. in the following four years, mariátegui spent time in barcelona, paris and northern italy where he was exposed to the revolutionary-focused writing of georges sorel and italian critical thinkers in turin and became a committed marxist. returning to peru in 1923, he was invited to lecture at the universidad popular and interacted with organized labour in lima. mariátegui continued to be a target of surveillance and political imprisonment by the leguía government, which exacerbated his already poor health. mariátegui’s intellectual endeavours increased in this period: he founded the socialist-focused journal amauta – meaning “teacher” in kichwa – in 1926, participated in the formation of the partido socialista del peru (socialist party of peru) in 1928, and published the seven interpretative essays in the same year. deteriorating health and ongoing political pressure encouraged mariátegui to consider leaving peru once again in 1930; mariátegui died that year on april 15th from health complications that had persisted for most of his life. one of mariátegui’s greatest contributions to a revolutionary marxist perspective stems from his emphasis on mutual interactions of the working class and indigenous people as potentially creative producers of new social realities. mariátegui argued that in peru the “indian problem” – better understood he argues as the “problem of land” –emerged not from racial or cultural differences but the inequalities created by the colonial political economy and its particular vestiges left by an incomplete liberal revolution (p.69-115). mariátegui noted the resistance and resilience of indigenous people throughout the colonial process: the history of indigenous struggles against colonialism (p.147) and the continued reproduction of alternative non-capitalist and non-feudalist relations of production in contemporary indigenous communities (p.97). challenging marxist scepticism of rural ‘peasantry’, mariátegui encouraged the urban proletariat to form an engaged relationship with indigenous activists as equal participants in the revolutionary transformation of the peruvian political economy (p.142; 239; 322). for mariátegui, a socialist revolution only emerges by a process of creative and collective engagement of people acting with an understanding of their historical realities. vanden and becker have selected and organized selections in the anthology into thematic categories including sections on indigenismo, 328 | climate change and its discontents myth, imperialism, women, and marxism and socialism – which is based on a large selection from mariátegui’s defence of marxism. academics may find that mariátegui’s brief articles individually rarely achieve theoretical or conceptual depth. through the organization of the anthology, however, each theme develops into a more holistic perspective demonstrating the peruvian’s complex and nuanced marxist understanding. the trade off in this organization is that the chronological development of mariátegui’s thought is obscured. as an activist intellectual, mariátegui’s writing often responded to and engaged with particular historical moments and organizational relationships – particularly with other anti-imperialist movements in peru and the developing influence of the comintern in south america. a pragmatic intellectual engagement that responded to the immediate political situation underlined important parts of mariátegui’s thought. while reading this anthology the reader should reflect on the contextual development of his arguments. mariátegui’s prose in rare moments suffers from the translation, which leads to awkward phrasing and the loss of some of the nuances. unfortunately notes were not written by the translators to explain their difficulties and translation choices. in the context of exposing an englishreading audience to mariátegui, however, the anthology is very readable and fairly precise. in the 1928 anniversary and balance sheet at the end of amauta’s second publication year mariátegui wrote: “history is endurance. the isolated cry, no matter how large its echo, is not valid; the constant continual persistent sermon is what matters. ideas that are perfect, absolute, abstract, indifferent to the facts, to changing and moving reality do not work; ideas that are germinal, concrete, dialectic, workable, rich in potential and capable of movement do” (p.127). mariátegui is a powerful example of an engaged intellectual whose ideas have contributed to latin america’s political transformations; greater attention by english readers is long overdue. vanden and becker’s anthology is an encouraging start. alternate routes a critical review editorial board: marybelle myers, daniel sansfacon, erika van meurs the previous editors jim conley and joan st. laurent were involved in selecting papers for this issue. distribution and promotion: joseph cooper, brian mokee illustrations: alwin and erika van meurs a iternate routes is an annual publication of graduate students in sociology and anthropology . manuscripts , subscriptions and communications should be addressed to: alternate routes department of sociology and anthropology carleton university ottawa, ontario, canada k1s sb6 the editioral board wishes to establish a genuine forum for the exchange of ideas. we welcome critical responses , commentaries or rejoinders , which we will endeavour to publish in subsequent issues. the editors gratefully acknowledge the financial assistance of the carleton university community : the department of sociology and anthropology and its chairperson, gordon irving; the dean of social sciences, dennis forcese; the graduate students ' association and the sociology and anthropology graduate students' caucus. ue also wish to thank bev cruikshank for : iministrative assistance . subscriptions : individuals and institutions: $3.50. make cheques payable to alternate routes. copyright 1982, alternate routes, unless otherwise noted. prin:nada. alternate routes vol 5 1982 editorial la revue alternate routes est publide par les etudiants gradues du departement de soaiologie et d'anthropologie de i'universite carleton. la revue se veut une alternative offerte aux etudiants desireux de developper une connaissance critique et de partiaiper aux debats actuels dans la societe canadienne . reconnaissant les contradictions inherentes a cette societe aussi bien qu'aux sciences sociales, nous rejetons d' emblee les divisions traditionnelles du savoir. notre objectif est done de contribuer au developpement d'une pensee originale qui ne s'enferme plus dans les orthodoxies du pouvoir mais ouvre sur une vision radicale de la societe canadienne. nous invitons done les etudiants que concernent ces questions a nous soumettre leurs articles . dans ce volume, les deux premiers articles 8 'adressent au probleme des petits producteurs independants . christensen analyse la crise de la production fruitiere dans la vallee de i'okanagan en colombie-britannique; myers, de son cqte, etudie le dsveloppement des cooperatives d'etat chez les inuit suite a i 'extinction du marche de la fourrure . dans le premier article publii en francais dans la revue, sansfacon explore quelques-uns des problemes relies a une lecture marxiste du droit, en analysant une decision juridique . s 'attardant aussi aux luttes en colombie-britannique , edelson relate les tendances dans les relations de travail au niveau des gouvernement8 locaux et soutient qu'une alliance entre les travailleurs des services publics et les consommateurs de ces services est essentielle au syndicalisme dans ce secteur . enfin, robinson s 'insere dans le debet marxiste sur la division entre travail manuel et travail intellectuel pour defendre i'argument que les colleges communautaires idgitiment les relations politiques de domination dans le procea de travail. soulignons enfin, que dans la veine de notre editorial, le prochain volume de la revue sera consacre aux articles touchant les questions feminines . editorial statement a iternate routes is a journal published by the graduate students in the department of sociology and anthropology at carleton university . the journal offers an alternative to students attempting to develop critical knowledge and to participate in continuing debates in canadian society. acknowledging the inherent contradictions in this society, as well as in the social sciences , we reject the traditional division of knowledge . it is our purpose to contribute to the development of thought which is critical of conventional science and open to a radical vision of canadian society and we invite papers from graduate students concerned with these issues . in the current issue, two contributions deal with independent commodity production. christensen addresses the crisis in fruit farming in the okanagan valley in british columbia and myers looks at the rise of state-sponsored co-operatives among the inuit after the collapse of the fur trade. in the first french paper published by a iternate routes , sansf'aeon explores some of the problems related to a marxist reading of law by way of a concrete analysis of a juridical decision. yet another paper dealing with struggles in british columbia comes from edelson who looks at trends in management-labour relations in local government and argues .for an alliance between civic workers and consumers of their services . finally, robinson enters the marxist debate on the division between manual and mental labour to argue that community colleges legitimize political relations in the labour process. in line with our emphasis on provocative analysis of contemporary issues, our next volume will be devoted to papers on women. biographical sketches erling christensen obtained his b.a. (sociology and political science) from simon fraser university and his m.a. (sociology ) from carleton university . he worked as a research coordinator with the canadian farmworkers' union. he is presently finishing a dissertation on the political economy of agriculture at simon fraser university . miriam edelson completed her b.a. hon. (political science) at mcmaster (1980). she is currently studying for an m.a. in political science at carleton university . she is president of cupe 2222, carleton'8 student assistants' union. the paper presented here is based on ongoing research on public sector unionization. marybelle myers obtained her b.a. (eng lit) in 1962 from trinity college, university of toronto. she taught in the northwest territories for two years, from 1965 to 1967 and was manager of project development for arctic quebec co-operatives from 1970 to 1980. her m.a. (sociology ) was obtained at mcgill university in 1978 and she is now a doctoral candidate at carleton university . david robinson obtained his b.a. hon. (sociology ) from st. francis xavier university in 1980. he is currently writing his m.a. thesis in sociology , on community colleges , at carleton university . daniel sansfaeon received his b.a. (psychology ) and m.a. (criminology ) from ottawa university in 1976 and 1981 respectively . he is presently a graduate student in the doctoral program in sociology at carleton university . his "tain research interests focus on the sociology of law and on the organization of social control . a critical review vol. 5, 1982 contents erling v. christensen aspects of the crisis in petit commodity production in the okanagan valley 1 marybelle myers beyond the fur trade: the rise and fall of the eskimo co-operative 27 daniel sansfacon sujet de droit et sujets de droit: de la pratique juridique au pluriel 67 miriam edelson accountable to whom? trends in managementlabour relations in local government 95 david robinson community colleges and the division between mental and manual labour 133 fiasfjusou jb. itz-ite (x6lst&q&j /d.l-zs aspects of the crisis in petit commodity production in the okanagan valley erling v. christensen petit commodity production in agriculture has been undergoing changes since 1945, with the general trend being towards increased capitalization of production. co-operative organization of production and distribution has enabled producers in the okanagan valley to resist, to a certain extent, the encroachment of capital. a crisis exists, nonetheless , in petit commodity production due to a pending breakdown of the co-operative structure as well as rising land prices due to speculation. les changements intervenus dans la petite production agriculturale depuis 1945 ddnotent une tendance croissante vers la capitalisation de la production. l' organisation cooperative de la production et de la distribution a permis aux producteurs de la vallee de i 'okanagan de resister, jusqu'a un certain point, a cet envahissement du capital. toutefois , en raison de sdrieuses difficultes dans la structure cooperative et des hausses du prix des terres dues a la speculation, la petite production indspendante traverse prisentement un etat de arise. alternate routes vol. 5 1982 2 introduction petit commodity production has, historically, been the basis of agricultural production in canada. although this basis has been transformed into larger capitalist units in some spheres of agricultural production, it has persisted in others. consequently, much debate has developed in recent years over the concept of petit commodity production and its role in canadian agriculture. in this paper, i focus on petit commodity production as a specific form of production. my argument is that, in the okanagan valley of british columbia, this form of tree fruit production persists, not as an isolated instance that exists in spite of a changing capitalist economy, but rather as a part of it. its persistence is due, in part, to the collective action of independent producers and their complementary roles in the larger capitalist economy. however, as independent producers in a capitalist economy they cannot escape the imminence of class struggle. it is, in fact, the contradictions inherent in their participation in the dominant capitalist economy that are responsible both for their persistence as independent producers and the severe crisis in their ability to continue as such. these contradictions are both external and internal. the internal contradictions become manifest, in part, by a crisis in collective responses to stave off transformation. the external contradictions become manifest, in part, by the pressures on agricultural land by state and capital. the most important structural element of independent commodity production in the tree fruit industry in the okanagan 3 valley has been the co-operative structure known as the british columbia fruit growers association (bcfga) . this co-operative structure developed as an attempt to protect and rationalize an industry dominated by independent producers. it has enabled producers to band together and to put some logic into both production and marketing. the bcfga has, however, been unable to control marketing. it has to compete with imports for the same market and, consequently, some producers have split from the organization and gone completely independent or have set up competing corporate structures. this split in the protective umbrella of the co-operative structure has created a crisis in both production and marketing in the industry as a whole. another important factor has been the limited land available in the okanagan, a narrow valley, affected by favourable climatic conditions not existing elsewhere in the province. some land has become available with increased technological advances in irrigation and fertilizing, but, as a whole, suitable land for tree fruit production remains limited. since land is at a premium for the agricultural industry, as well as the recreation industry , reproduction and/or transformation of petit commodity producers is contingent upon the availability and price of land. in turn, these factors affect the returns of agricultural production. there have been attempts to keep the price of agricultural land at artificially lower prices by putting a freeze on non-agricultural development, in spite of land protection, however, speculation and rising prices are reappearing, due to the pressure of recreational alternate routes vol. 5 1982 development as well as to. the inconsistency of the social credit government in removing certain parcels of land from the agricultural land reserves. these important aspects of independent commodity production -co-operative structure and land availability and price -have undergone some critical changes which have created a crisis in both the industry and in the viability of petit commodity producers to reproduce themselves as an economic unit. as i argue, this crisis will accelerate the contradictory forces affecting independent commodity producers in a capitalist dominated mode of production. the outcome of this accelerated class struggle is dealt with at the end of this paper. petit commodity production agricultural production in british columbia is generally organized into small independent production units, relying primarily upon family, as opposed to wage labour, a crucial distinction in the production of commodities (marx, 1967b: 548). in family production units there is virtually no distinction between capital and labour. the producer owns the means of production and is directly engaged in labour as one aspect of the relations of production. consequently, petit commodity production has been seen as constituting an independent mode of production. the conditions of petit commodity producers are, however, such that one cannot talk of an independent mode of production existing within a dominant capitalist mode of production (marx, 1967a:713). the merging of labour and capital is generally thought of as a transitory stage of development from feudalism to capitlaism, not expected to persevere in any significant form under the onslaught of capitalist development within an increasingly dominant capitalist mode of production (marx, 1967a : 7 13-716; 1971:810,812-813). herein lies the crux of the problem: why has petit commodity production persisted in agriculture for over a hundred years of capital development? or, to put it differently, why has agricultural production not been fully "rationalized" within the capitalist mode of production? there have been a number of recent attempts to develop a theoretical explanation of the persistence of independent commodity production and its varying rates of transformation. for, while it is true that it has per sisted, especial] y in agricultural production, it has also been changed and, even, transformed, in certain areas and spheres of production. petit commodity production persists, changes and transforms, 'then, in reaction to pressures and changes in the dominant capitalist mode of production. it has been argued by some that petit commodity production in agriculture, or "the family farm" is an apparition, or fossilized left-over from a previous time, and as such, must be understood in isolation (hedley, 1976:414). others argue that it is inevitable that small independent holdings will become part of a large corporate or capitalist structure (burbach and flynn,1980; hedley ,1976a) . such analyses, however, have found it difficult to explain the persistence of petit commodity production. they have been even less successful at explaining the small holding's contribution to and role in the larger economy. some have even argued that alternate routes vol. 5 1982 scale is of primary importance and that "... large farm units are necessary to allow efficient production of agricultural commodities" (flynn and buttel, 1980:949). agricultural organization in japan, denmark and france, as well as certain sectors in canadian agriculture, however, serves to refute that argument. one of the more insightful attempts to analyze the role of petit commodity production in agriculture is that of susan mann and james dickinson, who argue that the persistence of petit commodity production is due to "... an excess of production time over labour time..., labour recruitment problems, a lower rate of profit, and complications in the smooth realization of value in the sphere of circulation (1978:478)." this appears to be the first clear attempt to provide answers to why such forms persist. mann and dicikinson argue that it is the nature of agricultural production which creates the obstacles for capitalist development. in agriculture, much time is devoted to "natural processes" of growth before labour time is expended to produce value. during the intervals between planting and harvesting, for example, neither value nor surplus value is created (1978:472). they make a strong argument, separating "unproductive" ("of value) production time from "productive" (of value) production time. in computing value, they take into account labour invested in activities such as fertilizing and pruning, which create increases in production, hence, in value, but they eliminate activities such as tractor maintenance and shed building, which they consider to be nonvalue producing labour. such labour may be necessary to 7 production but it does not "create" value. the authors go on to link the possibilities of agricultural production with the problems of circulation, agreeing with marx that, although the circulation sphere produces no value, it is necessary in order that surplus value may be realized. the speed of circulation, for instance is important to capital; for, the quicker the turn-over, the quicker capital is required to renew the process. in canada, however, this process is determined, to a large extent, by climate which necessitates quick start-up of a new production cycle. nonetheless, circulation time is still of utmost importance, especially in the sphere of fresh fruit production. certain agricultural commodities, such as fresh fruits and vegetables, do not store well and require a quick turn-over in order to realize the full potential surplus value. purchasers of such commodities are not likely to buy at prices reflecting the cost and profit if the commodity is in the process of spoiling. while other agricultural commodities have benefitted by increased technology in cold storage facilities and transportation systems, fresh products still pose a firm or "absolute" limit for the circuit of commodity capital (mann and dickinson, 1987:475; marx, 1967b:131). as a consequence, capital has been slow to move into the production sector in most spheres of agricultural production. this limitation does not, of course, affect food grown for processing and in that sector there is already substantial involvement of capital. another attempt to analyze the persistence of petit commodity forms of production in agriculture has been undertaken alternate routes vol. s 1982 by carol maclennon and richard walker, who argue that the number of "family-owned and operated" farms has been declining and that the rural class structure is undergoing dramatic changes (1980:22). their contention is that a new "agrarian bourgeoisie with roots in the traditional family farms" will emerge from this crisis to create "a polarized structure, dominated by a small but powerful agrarian bourgeoisie" f 1980: 20) . the reason they give for the lack of corporate or "agribusiness" development is, however, superficial. they simply state that industrial corporations do not want to be bothered with direct agricultural production. big capital... has found it more advantageous in certain crops to contract with small farmers for their products rather than to invest directly in production (1980:3). they offer no explanation as to why this is so but, if their argement is put into the context established by mann and dickinson, there is, i believe, the possibility of further theoretical development. the major focus of the argument made by maclennon and walker is the changing rural class structure. illustration 1 is an attempt to graphically expand their argument, the crux of which is that family farm production is doomed to become a capitalist unit of production with a number of these farmers/owners being proletarianized into a combination of owner/of f -farm labourers. as we shall see later, however, family farm production has options which will delay this transformation, if not stop it altogether in certain spheres such as fresh fruit production. maclennon and walker argue further that increased labour productivity with increased debt to meet the cost price squeeze (where the costs of production, including heavy finance charges to banks and other lending agencies, greatly outdistance returns to the producer) will generate an increased reliance on wage labour at which point the "farm is pushed to become a capitalist unit of production" (1980:36). the difference between the development of a new "agrarian bourgeoisie" and the integration of agribusiness into industrial capital is not exlained sufficiently. illustration 1 the changing rural class structure (proletarianization of farm classes) family owner operators combination owner/wage earner in town sion small medium farmer edged out family farm production maintained through increases in family labour productivity + an attempt to solve the debt-income squeeze by combining increased debt with exploitation of a low wage labour force growth of agribusiness + increased mechanization as a way of increasing profits \r vertical integration with processors, distributors and retailers to maximize surplus value .v horizontal integration 4at this point the family farm is pushed to become a capitalist unit of agricultural production again, this argument could be made more attractive if combined with the argument made by mann and dickinson. this would help to clarify the dynamics of production which encourages expansion and integreation in certain spheres of production and alternate routes vol. 5 1982 10 consolidation and change, which maintains smaller "independent" units in other spheres. at any rate, both argue that capital integration is not inevitable (at least into the industrial sectors) for reasons which lie in the peculiarities of agricultural production which puts obstacles in the way of capital's need and development. while it is true that petit commodity production has persisted, it is also true that it. is in a state of constant turmoil. petit commodity producers are pressured and hemmed in in every direction. capital has developed control of production at both the input and the output side of agricultural production. the input level is dominated by capital in the areas of seed and fertilizer production, pesticides, farm machinery, etc. the output level is dominated in such areas as processing, wholesaling and retailing, as well as in the provision of transportation and storage facilities. this squeeze on the "independent" producer has the effect of increasing their dependence to the point where they can no longer control costs and prices or returns on their production. in fact, in certain instances and in certain spheres of petit commodity production in agriculture, it can be argued that the producer, far from being in control, is, rather, in possession of "sham property". as marx argues (the merchant) buys their (the independent producer's) labour and takes their property first in the form of the product, and soon after that the instrument as well, or he leaves it to them as sham property in order to reduce his own production costs (1973:510). this argument has been developed by hegedus in his distinction between ownership and possession of the means of production 11 (1976:95). the producer may "own" his property but the corporations which sell and buy from the producer may enjoy a"restricted-ownership exercise" or possession of the producer's means of production, labour power and product. the producer has often been forced to take conventional steps in order to survive such as increasing debt and attempts to increase productivity. as bernard bernier has so convincingly shown in his analysis of quebec agriculture, however, scale is "not a guarantee of rising income; for, the increase in productivity is more than offset by larger increases in expenses" (1976: 431). the same can be said of increased labour exploitation. as the percentage of labour costs goes up, so do management costs. at a certain level, the economic unit will either transform into a "capital" unit or it will have to increase labour productivity by further mechanization which, in turn, increases debt. this debt is not necessarily met with an increase in the price of the commodity. increases in debt are, in fact, often an important stage in the transformation of petit commodity producers or proletarianized labour (marx, 1971:435-441). other attempts which have been more successful in maintaininj independent units of production have been the development of marketing boards and co-operative structures as mechanisms to rationalize costs, production and price. these attempts help to develop a solution to the pressures of capital upon agricultural production. as marx argues: the moral of history... is that the capitalist system works against a rational agriculture, or that a rational agriculture is incompatible with the capitalist system . . . and needs either the alternate routes vol. 5 1982 12 small farmer living on his own labour or the control of associated producers (1971:121). what works specifically against a "rational" agriculture for capitalism is the long periods of "non-productive" (of value) time where large amounts of capital are tied up but create no value as well as factors such as climate and soil conditions which affect the production process and restrict the circulation of capital. it has also become increasingly difficult to exist strictly by one's own labour, due to the control over the input levels by capital and to land prices which do not reflect agricultural productivity. in response, many producers have formed associated organizations or co-operatives. petit commodity production in the okanagan valley tree fruit production in the okanagan valley has long been organized along co-operative lines. since 1939, singledesk selling (marketing control by one agency) through the grower owned british columbia tree fruits limited (bctf) has controlled the marketing of tree fruits in that province. as well as marketing control, the bctf has expanded into processing under the name of sun-rype limited and into controlled atmosphere storage under the name of british columbia fresh storage limited. these companies all come under the nominal control of the british columbia tree fruit growers association (bcfga). the 2200 members of the bcfga constitute the vast majority of the tree fruit producers in the okanagan valley. in the valley there are 2703 farms under crops and 91.6 per cent of these farms are classified as individual or family owned and operated farms. of the total number of crop producers 65.4 per cent are engaged in tree fruit production. 13 table 1 farms in the okanagan valley type acres % of growers % of land part-time 2-5 22 6 small commercial 5 -25 58 57 medium commercial 25 -60 8 24 large commercial 60 plus 1 11 these farms are generally small in size and, for the purpose of this study, are broken into four distinct categories (table 1) with 80 per cent of all tree fruit producers farming less than 25 acres, petit commodity production is the most common type of enterprise. these farms rely primarily upon family labour. the average small commercial farm will hire five to seven pickers at various times over a four month period to pick fruit as it ripens. it is estimated that wage labour constitutes 20 to 30 2 per cent of the total yearly labour. of the two larger categories, medium commercial farms rely to a greater extent on wage labour (estimated at 30 to 60 per cent of the total labour depending upon a number of variables such as family size and type of crop produced) , while the large commercial farm is a capitalist unit of production with more than 60 per cent reliance on wage labour. in my study, any farm requiring over 50 per cent wage labour is not considered a family owned and operated farm (mann and dickinson, 1978:477). the majority of production is destined for the fresh fruit market, a crucial market if small independent producers are to realize a price for their produce sufficiently high to allow them to continue production. fruit destined for processing is alternate routes vol. 5 1982 14 designated as "culls", and realizes only one third of the price of fresh fruit. the returns on processed fruit are, however, beginning to climb, comparatively, due to huge increases in packing costs of fresh fruit. for example, in 1972, packing costs represented 37.4 per cent of the total returns on all fruit commodities. this proportion of the cost has risen steadily and, by 1976, it constituted over 50 per cent of total returns (table 2) . table 2 british columbia tree fruits limited distribution of the sales dollar all commodities % 30grower — return to naked fruit packinghouse operation costs igencr «ium1 • fwoooctiom cott» taiiui acaimst iu.1 197« source: british columbia tree fruits limited annual reports. 15 this has created a problem for the grower in that the price of the commodity has not risen accordingly. the returns on apples and pears, for example, have remained constant in terms of sales value, and grower returns have decreased from approximately five cents a pound to less than three cents a pound (select standing committee on agriculture, 1978:10). the combined effects of climbing costs and diminishing returns has put the independent producers into a precarious position. this problem is exacerbated by the bctf's inability to generate fresh fruit markets capable of absorbing the majority of fruit produced. in certain commodities, the bctf has been unable to market even 50 per cent of the production. a case in point is cherries. in 1978, only 30 per cent of all cherries produced could be marketed through the association. consequently, much of the cherry production was marketed independently on roadside stands, the alternative being to have them designated as culls receiving a lower return. vast quantities were also sold to "fruitleggers" , or, directly, to wholesalers and retailers. the developing crisis in the industry's inability to market all of the fruit production through the bctf exploded in 1974. after numerous demonstrations and battles with the police, dissident growers put enough pressure on the provincial ndp government to have marketing restrictions lifted. this was done by instituting a farm income assurance program which would pay all farmers who stayed in the bcfga the difference between production and marketing quotas when the need arose. the only criterion for benefit would be marketing through the bctf. alternate routes vol. 5 1982 16 this development gave growers the legitimate right to sell independently, but as a consequence they would be struck from the bcfga and thus not be eligible for assurance benefits. even though most growers did not opt out of the bcfga, independent sales were, however, not curtailed. many farmers play both sides of the fence, selling to the bctf , in order to claim assurance benefits from the government, and then selling the remainder to "fruitrunners" from the lower mainland and alberta. according to government figures, more than 20 per cent of fruit production is sold outside agency control (select standing committee on agriculture, 1978:24), although some estimates are that up to 50 per cent of all producers are involved in this scheme (vancouver sun : june 19,1978:3). certainly, fruitlegging has become a lucrative business in the valley. in the 1960's it was common for a few people to arrive with half -ton trucks, buy fruit and then travel to alberta to sell if from roadside stands. by the mid-1970' s, fleets of semi -trailers were arriving to purchase 100 per cent of some farmers' production in commodities such as cherries. the fruitrunners would then travel throughout british columbia and the prairies, undercutting major retailers. this had the effect of pressure being put on the bcfga by major wholesalers and retailers, who threatened not to purchase through them if they did not control or clean up the industry. in fact, one of the major wholesalers and retailers in western canada is already being supplied outside the bctf. kelly douglas and super-valu (a part of the weston chain) is now purchasing from a newly formed, independent corporation. 17 two dissident growers, ronald fournier and graeme nelson, broke away from the bcfga and set up their own corporation, black sage orchards, which sells directly to kelly douglas. in 1979, this new corporation was being supplied by 75 orchardists and marketedin excess of 3/4 million pounds of apples to the weston empire. they undersold the bctf by a sufficient amount to enable super-valu to sell apples at twenty cents per pound below its competitors' price ( the province , october 5,1979:a2). safeway, the other major retailer in western canada, is contemplating following suit. the major saving that these "independents" have achieved is in the packaging of the fruit. since, for example, they do not wax and individually pack apples, they can realise a higher profit than they can on the returns they receive from the bctf. they can still sell cheaper to the wholesalers and retailers than the bctf can. the long term effect of this trend will be to erode industry protection of single-desk marketing. this, in turn, will allow large wholesalers and retailers to play producers off against each other. potentially, this situation may create a severe economic crisis among petit commodity producers in the valley, one from which they may not recover. at this stage, larger productive units will become increasingly viable and necessary. and, with larger productive units, mechanization and production for processing become possible. the advantages of discord in the industry for capital, whether processors, wholesalers or retailers, are obvious. discord allows increasing control and the merging of okanagan tree fruit production into a capitalist organized and alternate routes vol. 5 1982 18 controlled market. this may allow the producers to remain owners of their property but they will have lost more of what they possess as a result of their production by losing the ability to even partially determine price by control over marketing. in order for that to occur, the protection that petit commodity producers have provided for themselves must be eroded. a second factor creating pressure on petit commodity producers in the okanagan valley is that of agricultural land prices. the price of farm land in the okanagan has been going up rapidly, in spite of the freeze put on agricultural land bv the creation of the agricultural land reserves. these reserves were created to protect agricultural land for future use and thus to aid the survival of viable farm units. this was seen as an important step in protecting british columbia agriculture. prime agricultural land in the province occupies less than 1 per cent of the total land area. land suitable for fruit production occupies only l/100th of 1 per cent of the land area (british columbia land commission, 1975 : 5) . agricultural land is generally "lost" through three related processes (environment canada, 1978 : 4-4) . the first is through direct conversion to urban, commercial, industrial, or transport use. the second is through indirect urban impacts such as recreational development. the third is through economic decline and uncertainty in the agricultural industry. in the okanagan, pressures to take over farm land are generally related to growth in the recreation industry and urban growth. unfortunately for the agricultural industry in the valley, 19 lake frontage, the most desirable land, is also prime agricultural land. although the vast majority of producers support legislation protecting farm land (environment canada, 1978:73), organizations such as the okanagan mainland real estate board, various construction firms, and municipal councils frequently put pressure on the provincial cabinet to "unfreeze" certain land. others, such as private entrepreneurs with known social credit affiliation, have put pressure on the government to take land out of the reserve. a prime example is that of tom capozzi, a long-time social credit party supporter, who attempted to remove 1400 acres for subdivision into "ranchettes" to be sold to retiring albertans. he was so confident about the successful outcome of his application that he went ahead with subdivision and roadbuilding before a formal decision was made. while still under protection, the price of his land rose from $350 an acre in 1972 to $1750 an acre in 1979 (vancouver sun , october 27 , 1979 :a10) . this speculation in reserve land is not unusual in the okanagan valley, nor in the province as a whole. the implementation of land reserves has had two immediate effects: a rise in land prices for non-reserve land and demands for exclusion of certain lands from reserve protection. this also had the effect of increasing the price of protected land since the government has been amenable to passing orders-incouncil to release land, upon request, bypassing the protective commission. this made speculating in agricultural reserve land, for eventual removal, quite lucrative. alternate routes vol. 5 1982 20 two related pressures developed on agricultural petit commodity production. further growth through the acquisition of more land was stunted, and secondly, younger or new producers were discouraged from entering agriculture. a number of producers, being squeezed by an increasing price/debt trap, became quite amenable to selling out. the only way a number of producers stood to gain from their enterprise was to sell out and reap the benefits of rapidly rising land prices. rather than attempting to discourage speculation in agricultural land, the provincial government fed the uncertainty of land protection through erratic approval of apllication for land reserve removals. conclusion the net effect of problems in the co-operative organization of tree fruit production and the protected today/ >;one tomorrow land policies of the provincial government is a crisis in petit commodity production in the okanagan. it is a crisis that has very real consequences for the maintenance and reproduction of petit commodity production as the basis of agriculture in the valley. in terms of maintenance and reproduction, land prices ire too high to encourage the upcoming generation of producers to enter farming. land prices further encourage the selling of agricultural land to reap the benefits of high prices. this may suit present growers, but it will have devastating effects on future agricultural production. if the land is not removed from production through sales, then it will likely be transformed into larger capital units, either directly 21 controlled by a newly developing agrarian bourgeoisie or controlled by a hired manager on behalf of a non-farming owner or corporate enterprise holding the land for speculation. in either case, the land is removed from fresh fruit production. the so-called "new agrarian bourgeoisie" will likely mechanize and grow crops for processing since fresh fruit production is too labour intensive to be profitable. non-farming owners may be expected to remove agricultural land from production and turn it into more profitable parking lots or condominium projects geared to the tourist industry. the second aspect of the crisis in petit commodity production, that of strains in the protective umbrella of single-desk selling, has accentuated the attractiveness of selling out. this occurs w"hen sufficient income cannot be generated through' production. the crisis in co-operation in the valley has the potential of accelerating the transformation of production to larger units of production. it likewise has the potential to increase the necessity of having to augment family income by off -farm labour, if complete bankrupcy is to be avoided. there is, of course, also the possibility that the petit commodity producers will weather this storm, as they have others in the past. this time, however, they are beset by other problems. the importation of cheap fresh and processed products has cut into the industry's share of the market and farm labour problems are increasing and will lead to higher labour costs. last year, the newly formed canadian farmworkers' union started organizing in the valley. this will alternate routes vol. 5 1982 22 put pressure on the small producer and help accelerate the transformation of the industry away from petit commodity based productive units. also, the costs of increasing productivity through technology are growing at a faster rate than are the returns on production. in conclusion, the basis of the crisis of continued existence of petit commodity producers lies in the relationship between petty commodity producers and the larger capitalist economy. numerous pressures, two of which are dealt with in this paper, are brought to bear on these producers. as a class, they are waging a constant struggle with the larger capitalist economy to avoid being swallowed up or proletar ianized. their long-term survival prospects seem bleak. they have always been bleak. historically, they have played a role compatible with the needs of the larger capitalist economy and it is far from clear that this role has ceased. independent producers have persevered, creating new solutions to contradictions which in turn generate new contradictions requiring new solutions. their survival is due, in part to the nature of agricultural production, and, in part, to the needs of capital. it is not always beneficial for corporate capital to enter all spheres of production. 23 notes the same climatic conditions which make tree fruit production possible, also make this area a very desirable place for recreational activities, including a commodified tourist industry. farmers and speculators in the tourist industry are competing for the same land, the price of which increasingly reflects the higher prices that the investors in the recreation industry can offer. it is difficult to compare the exact amount of wage labour with family labour due to the lack of compatible statistical dat a .however , the small commercial and part-time farms hire wage labour only at peak picking times and during the rest of the year rely upon family labour . the estimate of 20 to 30 per cent hired labour comes from a comparison of farm labour pool data, census data and interviews with farmers. the estimates for the larger units were somewhat easier due to more permanent employment of wage labour and clearer statistical data. "fruitleggers" and "fruitrunners" are terms given to private entrepreneurs who come into the valley, buy fruit directly from the producers and then sell the fruit to small retailers and on roadside stands throughout the western provinces. since this bypasses the marketing control of the bctf, it is seen as an illegal activity. references bernier, bernard 1976 "the penetration of capitalism in agriculture." canadian review of sociology and anthropology 13, 4: 422-434. flinn, william and frederick h.buttel 1980 "sociological aspects of farm size: ideological and social consequences of scale in production." american journal of agricultural economics 1980: 946-953 . hedley, max , . .. 1976a "independent commodity production and the dynamics of tradition." canadian review of sociology and anthropology 13, 4: 413-4zj>gy and anthropology alternate routes vol. 5 1982 24 1976b "the social conditions of production and the dynamics of tradition: independent commodity production in canadian agriculture." doctoral dissertation, university of alberta, edmonton . hegedus, andras 1976 socialism and bureaucracy . london: allison and busby. maclennan, carol and richard walker 1980 "crisis and change in u.s. agriculture: an overview." agribusiness in the americas . burbach, roger and patricia flynn, edit. new york: monthly review press: 21-40. mann, susan and james m. dickinson 1978 "obstacles to the development of a capitalist agriculture." journal of peasant studies 5: 466-481. manning, edward w. and sandra s. eddy 197 8 agricultural land reserves of british columbia: an impact analysis . ottawa: environment canada. marx, karl „ «.«., ». 1967a capital , vol. 1. moscow: progress publishers. 1967b capital , vol. 2. moscow: progress publishers. 1971 capital , vol. 3. moscow: progress publishers. 1973 grundrisse . new york: vintage books. okanagan historical society 1964 "british columbia fruit growers association." the twenty -eighth report of the okanagan historical society . kelowna : 149-191 . raup, p. 1978 "some questions of value and scale in american agriculture." american journal of agricultural economics 60 : 503 -308 . select standing committee on agriculture 1978 the british columbia tree fruit industry . victoria : government of british columbia. shaw, paul 1979 canada's farm population . ottawa: statistics canada. 25 statistics canada 197 3 1971 census of canada, agriculture: british columbfa t ottawa : statistics canada. 197 8 1976 census of canada, agriculture: british columbia"! ottawa : statistics canada . the peoples food commission 1979 are your oysters ready dear? vancouver: the peoples food commission report to british columbia. 1980 the land of milk and money . canada: the alger press. veltmeyer, henry 1979 "the capitalist underdevelopment of atlantic canada." underdevelopment and social movements in atlantic canada . brym, r. j . and r. james sacauman , edit . toronto: new hogtown press: 17-35. warnock, j. 1971 "the farm crisis." essays on the left . lapierre, l e_t al, edit . toronto : mc lei land and stewart. alternate routes vol. 5 1982. graduate studies in sociology and anthropology carleton university the department of sociology and anthropology offers the following programs of advanced study and research: m.a. and ph.d. degrees in sociology, with specialization in comparative social organization social demography ecology theory methodology m.a. degree in anthropology, with specialization in north american studies theory methodology information regarding admission requirements and financial support may be obtained from: coordinator of graduate studies department of sociology and anthropology carleton university ottawa, canada k1s 5b6 historical materialism by crosssectional survey design : the limits of e.o. wright's study of class structure david s. hubka carleton university introduction few sociological debates have generated as much interest as those dealing with marxist or neo-marxist class analysis. the most discussed and critiqued contribution to this area in the past decade has been that of e.o. wright (e.g. wright, 1978; wright, 1986a). wright's project has undergone a number of significant revisions and reformulations, as wright has continually acknowledged and incorporated suggestions by his critics (see wright, 1989). this discussion will first review wright's attempts to extend marx's analysis of class. though the author is supportive of wright's general project to seek high levels of marxist theoretical integration (1989, p. 277), it is argued that this integration is limited by a theory of history based on a flawed thesis of structural determinacy with respect to class. while wright's efforts are specifically and admirably in the interests of 'grand theorizing' (i.e. viewing class structures as macro-level societal properties), his research focus is on microlevel mechanisms related to individual class positions (pp. 274278). though much discussion elsewhere deals with this and other issues related to marxist theories of history, the work of marxist historian derek sayer is presented as an example effective in emphasizing the shortcomings of wright's analysis. in sum, wright's practice of placing class position as causally prior to other variables related conceptually to authority, autonomy and property in a cross-sectional survey design provides less of a basis for emancipatory strategy than do traditional marxist attempts to explain class through historical analysis. the most optimistic prospects for wright's efforts are finally argued to be in repeating his research in the future, thereby providing a basis for addressing historical evolutions in capitalist class relations. in his most recent work, wright (1989) considers a full range of the many criticisms directed at his conceptualization and analysis of class structure. his first assertion is that class as a fundamental determinant of social change is "at the core of marxian class analysis" (p. 269). theoretical impulses arising from this core feature are, as wright sees it, torn between developing either simple or complex models of class structure in order to enhance its explanatory power. to occupy class location is thereby for wright to be affected by a set of mechanisms which limit 64 individual capacities to make choices and act (p. 275). these mechanisms for wright generate empirically observable effects, one of which is the capacity for collective action (p. 280). this derives partially from a model of class in which individual consciousness comes about through commonly lived experiences (in this case jobs) and the theoretical assumption that class structure shapes class conflict (p. 286). wright seems limited in many ways to describing how, in a single historical instance of class relations, classes represent exploitative relations. marxist emancipatory strategy, on the other hand, can be argued as best achieved by explaining class relations through historical analysis, rather than by explaining various individual conditions by class position through a cross-sectional survey design. wright (1986a) contends that marx's original theory is polarized between analysis of abstract structural maps and concrete conjunctural maps (p. 6). the first of these is a structural account of class positions, while the second is concerned with the collective struggles of individual actors. marx, according to wright, failed to systematically define and elaborate a concept of "class" (ibid.) and thus provided little basis for linking these polarized elements of structure and action. despite this, recent theory and research has attempted to bridge this gap between the concrete and the abstract. wright (1986a) describes the first of these neo-marxist attempts as dealing directly with the problem of the "new middle class" (p. 8). the second of these attempts has focused on processes of class formation. these processes have been characterized through institutional mechanisms which are largely autonomous from class structure, for example, political ideology (ibid.). in general, neo-marxist theory has attempted to reconcile traditional marxism with contemporary sociological class theory. wright's work (e.g. 1978; 1989) has also focused on this reconciliation, and has in this way made significant contributions to neo-marxist debate. it is in this spirit of theoretical integration that the present discussion weighs wright's approach with that of a more historically oriented method. wright's class theory (1978, 1986a) motivated the design of the survey used in the machine-readable data file: class structure and class consciousness: merged multi-nation file (1986b). this project was intended to provide data for comparative research of relational dimensions of inequality with special emphasis on authority, autonomy, and property. while providing the basis for scores of interesting studies, it can be argued that these data provide wright little basis for asserting macro-level theoretical claims. it is argued in the present paper that this limitation is a result of wright's failure to adequately specify historicity within the context of class formation and the potential for large scale social change. wright's theory of history is next reviewed, and counter-arguments are presented. 65 the history of empty places wright (1986a) typifies marx's analysis of class as elaborating 1) abstract structural maps: the determination of a structure of empty places in class relations which are devoid of people and 2) concrete conjunctural maps: the manner in which the people occupying these empty places organize in class struggle. he argues that marx emphasized only the second of these analyses: "while he gives us a list of descriptive categories, corresponding to the actual actors in the conflicts, he does not provide a set of precise concepts for decoding rigorously the structural basis of most of those categories" (p. 7). wright's purpose is thus to carry on marx's work, 'filling in' the elaboration of these abstract structural maps, in order to develop an 'effective correspondence' between the two levels of analysis (p. 8). wright thus proceeds to apply concepts derived from historical analysis, without himself carrying out historical analysis. he contrasts poulantzas and skocpol , claiming that while poulantzas argues that the level of abstraction of mode of production is sufficient to characterize the historical association of class and state, skocpol rejects the validity of this level of abstraction, and argues for a "strictly historical (i.e. conjunctural)" analysis of the relationship of the state to class structure (1986a, p. 12). both, claims wright, are theorizing on the same level of abstraction that of the level of social formation. in marxist analysis, according to wright, social formation equates to mode of production. for wright, mode of production is hence at the core of the marxist theory of the "developmental stages" of capitalism (p. 17). given that these stages are in fact "a specific kind of general structural property" (ibid.), the level of abstraction of the mode of production is, for wright, effective in analyzing historical stages of development. by combining conceptually four historic modes of production, wright develops a typology of interpenetrated forms of production. he is then able to identify divergent phases of capitalism, and to thereby provide a range of possible immanent phases (wright, 1983). wright furthermore discredits marx for failing to develop this so-called 'legitimate' form of historical materialism. in focusing on the historical conditions of the formation of "concrete class organizations, parties, shop floor organization unions," marx is argued to have 1) neglected the structural conditions of class: "institutional variability in class relations in given jobs" (p. 9), and furthermore to have 2) failed to develop a link between theorized conjunctural class formation and undertheorized conjunctural class structure (p. 13). in proposing a 'theory of history' wright (1986a) provides a "typology of class structures, exploitation, and historical transitions" (p. 115). the types of social formation in this typology are sequentially feudalism, capitalism, statism, socialism 66 and communism. wright also provides the 'historical task of revolutionary transformation'. these in "turn represent respectively increasing levels of emancipation: individual liberty, socializing means of production, democratization of organizational control, substantive equality, and sel f -actualization. these increasing levels of emancipation, he claims, represent the conditions by which successful transition to the next stage may be made. the probability of achieving his tasks depend directly on the level of the development of productive forces on each level (p. 116). his trajectory of future societies is thus probabilistic, as it is contingent on a set of preconditions (ibid.). the historical transitions outlined by wright's version of historical materialism are consequently not 'iron laws', but rather provides a range of possibilities which depend on the class structure at each given stage. this is claimed to be an effective modification of traditional historical materialism, which argues: "whenever a transition from one form of class relations to another becomes historically possible, forms of class struggle will develop that guarantee that some transitions will occur" (wright, 1986a, p. 117). in developing a thesis specifically of "capitalism's futures'", wright takes to task rescuing historical materialism from this iron-clad law of history: "one of the central thrusts of historical materialism has always been that historical development occurred along a single developmental trajectory... it is for this reason that historical materialism is often considered a teleological philosophy of history with one final state inexorably pulling social change towards it" (wright, 1983, p. 122). arguing for a new structural mode of production: "statism", wright claims to effectively show that there is not one future to capitalism (socialism), but in fact two (socialism and statism). the structural determination of capitalism's futures thus becomes a probabilistic determination rather than an inexorable determination. not only does wright claim to rescue historical materialism from its surfeit of determinacy, but also increases the revolutionary strategist's level of certainty. the primacy of productive relations remains the key to social change, given that this power structure determines the manner in which essential resources can be used: "the decisive alternatives that are historically possible revolve around the system of production and appropriation" (p. 123). thus, in the event of "revolutionary rupture", an active, conscious effort must be made to prevent a restoration of both capitalist power and statist power. invaluable to the revolutionary is this guide to the 'actual patterns of social change' not readily provided by an unmodified historical materialism (p. 123). it can be argued, on the other hand, that marx's method supports neither an iron-clad law of history, nor a probabilistically contingent one. the charges that marx's 67 interpretation of history promotes iron-clad laws, resulted partially from the fact that his method of presentation differs from his method of inquiry (eg. sayer, 1979, pp. 96-103). marx notes: "(inquiry) has to appropriate the material in detail, to analyze its different forms of development, to trace out their inner connections. only after this work is done, can the actual movement be adequately described. if this is done successfully... it may appear as if we had before us a mere a priori construction" (marx quoted in sayer, 1989, p. 92). "what is designated with the words 'destiny', 'goal', 'germ', or 'idea' of earlier history is nothing more than an abstraction from later history, from the active influence which earlier history exercises on later history" (ibid., p. 74). there is evidence that marx was hostile toward interpretations of his work as advocating a generalized model of historical determinacy. in rebutting such an interpretation, marx charges the author with taking out of context incidental texts and "transforming (his) historical sketch of the genesis of capitalism in western europe into a historico-philosophical theory of the general course fatally imposed on all peoples, whatever the historical circumstances in which they find themselves placed..." (marx quoted in sayer, 1989, pp. 69-70). gramsci's criticisms of bukharin are also suggestive here. bukharin's division of marx into two components: 1) "a theory of evolution appearing as sociology" and 2) "a philosophy which amount to crude materialism", leads to an empty typology of historical forms. "separated from the theory of history and politics, philosophy cannot be other than metaphysics, whereas the great conquest in the history of modern thought, represented by the philosophy of praxis, is precisely the concrete historicization of philosophy and its identification with history" (gramsci, 1971, p. 436). if one accepts this as a viable interpretation, marx's methods and conclusions seem opposed to rather than elaborative of those suggested by wright. production as an historical abstraction is a theme common among marxist scholars, but is itself "multiply divided and diverges into different determinations", and as such facilitates the identification of divergent, more concrete features of these abstract continuities (marx quoted in sayer, 1989, p. 74). while all historical epochs have different determinations of production, they also have certain common determinations. this is given by the very nature of production as an historical continuity (p. 74-75). the labour process is the production of use-value, which is necessary for affecting exchange of matter between people and nature. this necessity implies that the production of use-value is common to every phase of human existence. this continuity, however, is not the entire picture and indeed, is not even the most crucial part, in that it fails to provide the differing social conditions of the production of use-value (for example slavery, capitalism or hunting and gathering). from this position, one can assert that marx's method involves somewhat more 68 than identifying a rigid model of production relations and that, in fact, such models could only form a single level of abstraction useful only in defining a common aspect from which essential differences can be further concluded. marx claims: "success will never come with the master-key of a general historico-philosophical theory, whose supreme virtue consists in being supra-historical" (ibid., p. 73). yet three traditional marxist theses are redefined according to wright's "sympathetic" modifications. the first rejects the traditional view (marx's own) that "socialism is the immediate imminent future capitalism", given that such a transition would necessitate the equalization of two "exploitation assets": means of production and organization (1986a, p. 117). there is clearly no logical necessity for these to simultaneously occur, and hence wright concludes that both statism and socialism are possible futures to capitalism. second, wright argues that other classes have the potential to carry out revolution, and hence refutes the marxist opinion that "the proletariat are the only bearers of a revolutionary mission within capitalism" (ibid.). third, wright claims to show that socialism, contrary to marx, has a "distinctive form of exploitation". marx, he claims, argued that socialism is not a mode of production and merely constituted an intermediate step to communism (p. 118). these three modifications do not, according to wright, undermine the important notion of progression in marx's view of historical trajectory, and consequently supposes to retain support for marx's claims (p. 118). wright (1986a) provides a typology of exploitation relations which correspond to specific class structures, described as "essentially a typology of modes of production" (p. 109). he admits, however, that no society has only one form of exploitation. in order to better characterize the form of exploitation observed in societies, wright provides three "axes of variabilities", which typify the unique combinations of types of exploitation: 1) "relative weight" of exploitation, 2) the degree of linkage of exploitation to "internal" or "external" relations, and 3) the degree to which various exploitations "overlap" or are "distinct" from each other in a given society. given the possible combinations of four modes of production, which necessarily involves four types of exploitation (feudal, capitalist, statist, or socialist), wright attempts to operationalize the "relative weight" of these exploitations. he first rejects the marxist notion that one or another form of exploitation must remain the "dominant mode", on the basis that two or more forms may in fact carry equal weight in a single society (p. 109). possible operationalizations of relative weight are then identified as 1) "the relative, aggregate magnitudes of... appropriations of social surplus based on property rights by owners of different exploitation-generating assets", 2) "a measure of the 'class power' of those who appropriate surplus", 3) the degree to 69 which the dominant mode is functionally associated with subordinate modes and 4) the "dynamic effects of different exploitations" (p. 109-111) . wright then proceeds to argue for the fourth approach, but claims that due to the "theoretical underdevelopment of our understanding of the dynamics rooted in each of the forms of exploitation other than capitalism, let alone the possibility of distinct 'laws of motion' forced by distinct combinations of these forms of production" it is overly difficult to operationalize this notion of exploitation (p. 112). wright provides no means of identifying the degree to which types of exploitation overlap, or are distinct from one another. he does assert, however, that in societies where an overlap occurs, a higher degree of class polarization exists. implied in this is the notion that multiple forms of exploitations, as reflected in class structure, can have an additive effect on class struggle when combined in the same society . wright's form of structural causality is neither linear (historic), nor expressive (i.e. reducing the constituent parts to an essence of totality), but rather represents a causality "imminent" in its effects. though supposing to contribute to con junctural , historical analysis through survey method, wright is limited by the historical specificity of cross-sectional data. his model of class structure derives from marx' s historical analysis of the development of capital, but is reduced to expressing the constituent elements of capital (e.g. class structure, class struggle, class consciousness) within a recursive, cross-sectional causal model . cohen (1982) comments on the demise of marxian sociology: "despite the variety of theoretical strategies and political positions that make up the spectrum of neo-marxian class theory, an unreflective relation to the marxian original is characteristic of them all" (p. 2). in contesting the theory of class boundaries advocated by poulantzas and wright, she remarks: "the analysis always proceeds from the side of 'structure', juggling and elaborating categories ad infinitum in order that they might mesh with the 'realities' of social stratification. yet it is unclear whether these realities are simply given, or, worse, derived from the structures themselves. since the old class concepts and prejudices are presupposed from the onset, the key dilemma endemic to any class theory based on das kapital cannot even be posed" (p. 10). schmidt (1981) represents another opposition, and identifies the dominant lack of interest in history as not simply the demise of current western sociology, but also as a function of the progress of bourgeois society (pp. 1-2). a generalized loss of historical consciousness, leads to a failing conception of the nexus of past and future. this further undermines a comprehension 70 of the causes of present conditions, and delimits the role of individual agency in effecting future states. wright's analysis of cross-sectional data permits no explanation of the causes of present class structure, and provides no evidence that present exploitative relations are not in fact natural and eternal. wright attempts in this sense not even a crude historiographic analysis, but rather proposes a series of hypotheses to be tested within historically decontextualized data. wright relies on historical analysis only to the point that marxist analysis has already provided him with static class categories. failing to incorporate historical data, wright's form of statistical method is not justified by, but rather tends to require the causal determinacy of class structure. wright ' s method in effect does not conform to, but rather opposes the logic of historical materialism. class struggle by class structure the criteria for developing his model of class structure, claims wright (1986a, pp. 27-37), is based on six constraints: 1) class structure imposes limits on class formation, class consciousness and class struggle. this constraint does not imply that class structure exclusively determines class formation, class consciousness, and class struggle (p. 29), but does necessitate the conception of a causal association of class structure on these other elements of class: "the argument that class structure imposes basic limits on class formation, class consciousness, and class struggle is essentially a claim that it constitutes the basic mechanism for distributing access to resources in a society, and thus distributing the capacity to act" (p. 28). this mechanism of distribution is a qualifier placed by wright on the claim made by 'most marxists' that class structure is identified one way or another as the basic determinant of the other three elements (ibid.). while deeming class structure to be the basic mechanism determining these elements, wright acknowledges that he is unable to provide a description of the precise manner in which this determination occurs. though offering that the precise mechanisms are cognitive, or psychological, wright proposes to inform as to the more important, 'real' social mechanisms of determination. class struggle, in wright's schema, provides the 'transformative principle' of class, but is ultimately determined by class structure (p. 30). his second conceptual constraint is thus: 2) "class structures constitute the essential qualitative lines of social demarcation in the historical trajectories of social change" (ibid.). not only does class structure determine class formation, class consciousness, and class struggle, but it also "limits the possibility for other aspects of social structure" (p. 31). class structure, in this way "constitutes the central organizing principles of societies" and within the area of classical marxism "the crucial historical line of social demarcation remains class relations" (p. 31). from these premises, 71 wright is able to claim that "class structure is the central determinant of social power" (p. 31). organizational status is hence for wright, a function of class structure, which in turn imposes limits on an individual's or a collectivities' capacity to act. consciousness is the "realization by the subordinate class that it is necessary to transform the class structure if there is to be any basic changes in their capacities to act, and the realization by the dominant class that the reproduction of their own power depends on the reproduction of the class structure" (1986a, p. 28). though acknowledging that class struggle constitutes the central transformative principle of class structure, wright argues that this process is itself determined by class structure. wright's third constraint is simply 3) the concept of class is a relational concept. this argument simply dissociates marxist, relational class concepts from gradational , typically income determined class concepts. wright argues that gradational class concepts could not possibly provide the necessary "demarcations" upon which a theory of history could be developed (p. 35). 4) the social relations which define classes are intrinsically antagonistic rather than symmetrical. stated simply, classes constitute opposing interests. consequently, 5) the objective basis of these antagonistic interests is exploitation, and hence results in exploitative relations. finally, 6) the fundamental basis of exploitation is to be found in the social relations of production. here, wright argues that marxist class models are necessarily production-centred. in studying a cross-section of class structure, consequently, wright limits his approach to testing hypotheses in which class position is causally prior to other variables measured in his survey. while he identifies this ?.s a distinct contribution fundamentally opposed to other types of class analysis (1989, p. 269-78), he also claims to be committed to a high level of marxist theoretical integration (ibid., p. 277). the impetus for this commitment comes partly from marx's untimely death during his work on class categories in the last chapter of capital volume iii: "what constitutes a class" (see tucker, p. 441). marx identifies the three "big classes" of modern society as: 1) wage labourers 2) capitalists and 3) land owners. though marx views the class divisions of his england as "obliterated" by middle and intermediate strata, he views the process of capital as one of increasing polarization or "the (concentration) of scattered means of production into large groups" (p. 441). answering what constitutes a class, marx responds (at first glance) "the identity of revenues and sources of revenues" (p. 442). this, however, is seen as far too simplistic, given that, for example, physicians and officials also constitute separate classes with this criteria. marx hence proposes that each class further involves an "infinite fragmentation of interest and rank into which the division of 72 labour splits labourers as well as capitalists and landlords" (p. 442). this suggests again that marx's concept of class should not be reduced to crude analytic categories, but as a continuing process of polarization and concentration of class interests. sayer (1979) describes the paradox of althusserian interpretations of marx, which seems relevant in addressing wright's specific approach. they attempt to overcome marx's difficulty by ensuring a correspondence of concept and reality. the "mystif actory mechanism" which corresponds to ideological and phenomenological forms could not be located as a subjective error of experience, but must rather be seen as a subjective falsehood. in other words, reality is not misinterpreted, but rather misrepresents itself. if consciousness itself was to be doubted, a scientific interpretation of reality would be impossible. marx could not begin to promote the "falsity of ideology (through a) materialist theory of consciousness" if he were to accept that this falsity is only subjective (p . 31) . emancipation, could not, for marx, be promoted through such an investigation as is prescribed by wright (1989, p. 16). it is not the subjective illusions of capital, but rather the illusory function of the objective forms of capital which promote human alienation. it is an empirical analysis of the historical development of these objective forms that provides the historical revelation that capital is not given by nature, but is rather imposed on people, by people. sayer (1979) argues: "fetishism involves a two-fold transgression of proper categorical boundaries... on the one hand, properties which distinguish phenomena as individual members of classes and hence ought properly to be the object of historical categories are subsumed under transhistorical categories and explained by theses logically capable of accounting only for the characteristics of the classes to which they belong... and on the other hand, the historical attributes of the phenomena are thereby falsely universalized (p. 46). wright's analysis of class categories does not avoid the fetishized nature of class, but in fact contributes to it. for instance, the class distribution of respondents appears to wright only as a cross-sectional description, not as historically contingent on capitalist forces of production. "fetishism presents a dehistoricized, desocialized world whose makers are reduced to passive spectators in a mystery not of their making. marx's critique points behind this, to a history. this is how marx promotes the overcoming of human self-alienation" (sayer, 1979, p . 47 ) . 73 conclusion wright (1986a) claims to defend what he identifies as "the core theses of marxism" (p. 2). he terms his segment of the academic community "analytic marxism"; "the systematic interpretation and clarification of basic concepts and their reconstruction into a more competent theoretical structure" (ibid.)in reference to marx's unfinished section of capital, volume 3 "what constitutes a class", wright proposes that classes (1986a) represents an extension of marx's theory of class structure and class formation "faithful both to the theoretical agenda forged in marx's work, that is, understanding the development of the contradictions of capitalism, and the political goals that agenda was meant to promote" understanding the conditions for the revolutionary transformation of capitalist society (p. 16). historical materialism can be viewed as an approach wherein the various forms of exploitation as manifested in certain historical instances are studied. this materialist conception thus generates a higher level of theoretical abstraction whereby specific, less abstract societal forms can be understood. the key to marx's analysis is not the generalized mode of economic exploitation as prescribed by wright, but rather the specific historical forms or manifestations of this universal fact. wright's empiricism fails to move beyond describing existing structures, and is never conditioned by an awareness of the diachronic. this implies that to understand a structure, one must also understand both its transformations, and the range of its possible transformations. though wright (1989) admits that his method of class analysis "risks losing the dialectical and dynamic character" of marxist explanations, he claims that these risks are worth taking (p. 16). admitting further that his empirical operationalizations of marx's theory of class have generated only modest insights, they have nonetheless served to "clarify a range of dilemmas" (ibid.). given, however, serious departures from both marx's methods and observations, wright possibly reifies a questionable version of marx's classes, rather than extend his explanations . wright admits that while progress has been made in the conceptualization of class through his project in the past decade, "nevertheless the goal of producing a class structure concept which is at one time theoretically coherent and empirically comprehensive remains elusive" (1989, p. 270). his approach remains, however, that of increasing the complexity of his various class structure typologies as a means of enhancing their explanatory power. in discussing advances made in his project, wright alludes to the value of a general marxist theory of history. his new structural typology, wright argues, has a "much stronger connection to the general marxist theory of history than did the earlier framework. the structural typology on which the class structure map was based 74 had a clear standing within the general theory of the historical trajectory of social forms" (p. 306). however, conceptually basing a class typology on a generalized notion of epochal forms of material relations is no more than paying a lip service to the logic of historical analysis. the transformative principles providing the means to emancipation at each stage can only be implied, and not directly accessed through wright's micro, ahistorical research focus. this is not to say that wright's project is not valuable, for it is in fact highly valuable. the survey has provided data for a wide range of interesting and important studies (e.g. clement, 1990; hubka and gillespie, 1989; baer et al , 1987; black and myles, 1986; winn, 1984) and has made significant inroads to combining classical social theory with contemporary quantitative research methods. however, as i have argued above, class is more interesting as a dependent variable than as an independent variable and, in the interests of social change, is best seen as a process rather than as a structure. this opposition, on the other hand, is a fact of meta-theory, and is not to be resolved presently, if at all. the most valuable contribution of wright's work will possibly be made, ironically, at the point that his project itself becomes a part of history data of a past phase in capital relations. historians, for example, often rely on centuries old church records to understand past demographic compositions. marx's 18th brumaire is a now famous schematic of class interests and material relations. erich fromm's survey of class consciousness among the working class in weimar germany is a fascinating and insightful study during an important period in world history (fromm, 1984) . the value of these sources of data to the social researcher today lies in the capacity to observe an historical trajectory. the rise of quantitative social research has involved a number of ongoing survey projects (eg. the general social survey conducted by statistics canada) enabling for the first time study of changes in survey data over time. given recent changes in the world order, the predicted decline of u.s. economic strength and the continuing rise of global capital, it seems likely that wright's in depth study of class structure will increase in value in the coming decades . 75 references althusser, l. (1971) lenin and philosophy and other essays. middlesex: new left books. baer, d., e. grabb and w. johnston. (1987) "class, crisis, and political ideology in canada: recent trends." canadian review of sociology and anthropology, 24, 1, pp. 1-22. black, don and john myles. (1986) "dependent industrialization and the canadian class structure: a comparative analysis of canada, the united states and sweden." canadian review of sociology and anthropology, 23, 2, pp. 157-181. bottomore, tom. (1981) modern interpretations of marx. oxford: basil blackwell. clement, wallace. (1984) "comparative class analysis: locating canada in a north american and nordic context." canadian review of sociology and anthropology, 27, 4. cohen, jean l. (1982) class and civil society: the limits of the marxian approach. university of massachusetts press, amherst . fromm, erich. (1984) (bonss b. weinberger trans.) the working class in weimar germany. london: berg publishers inc. gandy , d. ross. (1979) marx and history. austin: university of texas press. gramsci , antonio quinton hoare. (1971) (geoffrey novell smith trans.) antonio gramsci: selections from the prison notebooks. new york: international. hubka, david s. and michael gillespie. (1989) "a comparison of two marxist class typologies." presented at the western association of sociologists and anthropologists conference. banff, alberta. poulantzas, nicos. (1973) "on social classes." new left review, 78, pp. 27-54. poulantzas, nicos. (1975) classes in contemporary capitalism. london: new left books. sayer , derek. (1979) in mephan, john and d.h. ruben (ed) issues in philosophical marxism. sussex: harvester press. sayer, derek. (1987) the violence of abstraction: analytic foundations of historical materialism. oxford: basil blackwel 1 . 76 sayer , derek. (1989) readings from karl marx. london: routledge. schmidt, alfred. jeffrey herf (trans). (1981). history and structure: an essay on hegelian -marxist and structuralist theories of history. massachusetts: mit press. tucker, robert c. (ed) (1978) the marx-engels reader. w. w. norton and company, new york. winn, s. (1984) "class and income in sweden." social forces, 62, 4, pp. 1027-1034. wright, erik olin. (1976) "class boundaries in advanced capitalist societies." new left review, 98, pp. 3-11. wright, erik olin. (1978) class, crisis and the state. london: new left books. wright, erik olin. (1979) class structure and income determination. new york: academic press. wright, erik olin. (1980) "varieties of marxist conceptions of class structure." politics and society, 9, pp. 323-370. wright, erik olin. (1983) "capitalism's futures'." socialist review, 13, pp. 77-126. wright, erik olin. (1986a) classes. london: verso books. wright, erik olin. (1986b) "class structure and class consciousness: merged multi-nation file: united states survey, 1980, sweiien survey, 1980, norway survey, 1982, canada survey, 1983, finland survey, 1981." (machine readable data file). principal investigator: erik olin wright. institute for research on poverty (distributor). inter-university consortium for political and social research (distributor). ann arbour michigan. wright, erik olin. (1989) "the comparative project on class structure and class consciousness: an overview." acta sociologica 32, 1, pp. 2-33. wright, erik olin et al . (1980) "the american class structure." american sociological review, 47, pp. 70-726. wright, erik olin et al . (1989) the debate on classes. london: verso books . 77 on the devaluation of women's labour: hegemonic and local ideological practices paul shreenan carleton university introduction the atlantic region of canada has a history of underdevelopment beginning shortly after confederation and which continues to the present . the particular form of capitalist underdevelopment which has occurred in the region is one characterized by a heavy reliance on the government sector and also on resource extraction industries like fishing and forestry. the fishing industry presents a complex of relations between levels of state regulatory mechanisms , class conflict, and gender inequality. one particular division, that between inshore and offshore fishing, is important in this paper. offshore fishing is carried out on large vessels (65 feet and over) owned by large fishing and fish processing companies (e.g., national sea products or fisheries products international). small boat fishers with boats under 45 feet in length pursue inshore fisheries including lobster, herring, mackerel, cod and other groundfish when conditions permit. they are versatile, multi-purpose fishers. small boat fishers operate out of the household unit of production and comprise the mainstay of hundreds of small fishing communities on the whole of canada's east coast. in fishing communities, the focus of this paper, women contribute to the family economy through a variety of productive strategies including subsistence production, the informal economy and waged labour (connelly and macdonald, 1983:46), yet women's work has consistently been devalued, undervalued or simply ignored by both the scholarly and broader community (porter, 1987:48). it is in the sphere of domestic labour, both productive and reproductive, that women's work is most undervalued because it is not public/visible and because its contribution has been systematically ignored in terms of the enduring cultural production surrounding the fishing industry and related sea-going cultures. in brunton et al . (1981) we see, for example, an extensive compilation of song and poetry about the lives of working class (including fisher) atlantic canadians over the past century or more. unfortunately, as the authors are well aware, the material is practically devoid of the presence of women and women's experience except where they are mentioned in a sexist and derogatory way. cultural production, thus, reflects the kinds of ideological practices which legitimate certain kinds of discourse and render alternate voices inaudible. in this paper i will be concerned, mainly, with the question of how the invisibility of 44 much of women's labour and its under-valuation is reproduced through ideological practices which legitimate female subordination . i will examine the ways in which three hegemonic ideological practices (capitalism, liberalism, patriarchy) together legitimate and reproduce this subordination. then moving from the general to the specific i will introduce an exploratory discussion of a local ideological practice which, though not unheard of in other industries or regions, has manifestations peculiar to small boat fishers. the purpose of this paper is thus modest; to begin to recognize particular, local forms of knowledge and practice which articulate with other hegemonic practices hence contributing to the reproduction of the subordination of women. i offer an analysis of those ideological practices integral to the reproduction of unequal gender relations in the maritimes. in particular the focus is on the culture in which small boat fisher families are immersed. it should be stated at the outset that my analysis is an exploratory discussion of gender relations in maritime fishing communities rather than a comprehensive examination. the analytical focus is, therefore, admittedly theoretical and self-consciously lacking in detailed empirical material. in addition this discussion should not be read as an attack on small boat fishers, their communities, or their ways of surviving. instead, it is advanced in an effort to recognize gender inequality in this historically specific material and cultural context; to begin to explicitly define one such local ideological practice, what i call the ideological practice of independence; and to make some tentative suggestions pertaining to possibilities for social action and social change. few studies articulate the actual labour processes of the women of fisher households in the contemporary context. however, in an important case study on women of small boat fisher households in gloucester, massachusetts, clark shows how women's labour is integral to the overall labour processes of small boat fishing. in some circumstances, for example, women may represent the fisher household's interests at the level of political organizing activities, whether these are formally established or not. this may entail lobbying at the local level or at other state regulatory sites. clark also explains how some women have initiated creative marketing of the catch through marketing a cookbook which spreads the knowledge of local seafood cookery. women, acting as "land agents" for the household fishing enterprise work to get the best deal possible for the catch by negotiating with more than one buyer; they are, in other words, sales agents for the catch. fisher women have often stayed in school for significantly longer than their partners, their reading and writing skills are better than their partners' thus enabling them to be more effective managers of particular organizational tasks involved in the fishery. they have been responsible for the negotiation of loans, equipment purchases, bills payment, crew payment, repair arrangements, mortgages, insurance policies and licences (clark, 45 1988:264-8). each of these tasks merits close examination in order to articulate the nitty gritty of household production in the age of monopoly capitalism. as already mentioned my goal here is more modest -to move toward the recognition of local ideological practices and the development of a theoretical framework which may assist in this area of research. to that end the concepts of hegemony and ideological practice must be introduced. the concept of hegemony borrowed from gramsci and developed by others serves as a corrective to the exclusively class determined analysis of orthodox marxists (mouf f e, 1987 ) . hegemonic domination in present day capitalist society, or the way in which capital establishes and reproduces its rule is not accomplished through force. hegemonic rule is always precarious or unstable. consent or hegemony is produced and reproduced through the institutions and practices of civil society as opposed to being solely enforced through the repressive state apparatus. the concept of ideological practice is central to the present analysis; practices are ideological when they legitimate relations of inequality . as dorothy smith points out ideological practices "are pervasive features of the organization of the juncture between the relations of ruling and the actualities of people's lives they organize and govern" ( smith, 1990 : 43) . these practices make social relations intelligible to us although they are systematically selective and incomplete. they tell partial truths, thereby obfuscating the major contradictions that characterize power relations. these concepts will be more fully developed below, but will nevertheless be illuminated here. what makes certain practices ideological is that they embody highly selective representations of reality. for example, liberal philosophy posits free and equal individuals; by doing so it defines out of existence a vast array of social structural elements like gender, class, ethnicity or sexual orientation. furthermore the philosophy posits that all individuals are equal before the law; yet when confronted with the reality of the law, individuals who bring to the court vastly different economic and social resources predictably get vastly different outcomes. in fact, given an historically informed theory of social relations it would indeed be odd if all groups had similar experiences vis a vis the law . formally equal individuals also freely compete for places in the world of paid work. if we systematically ignore the above mentioned structural differences we can look, for example, at the labour market and assume that any individual is free to take up any occupation given the proper motivation. the divergence between ideological practice and reality is readily apparent. we know that it is neither happenstance, poor individual choices nor biological 46 programming that push and pull women disproportionately into particular occupations (armstrong and armstrong , 1978) . hegemonic practices amd women's subordination in this section i will discuss liberal, capitalist, and patriarchal ideological practices each of which includes important constituent relations that contribute to the reproduction of the subordination of women in general. it is, however, only for heuristic purposes that i separate these hegemonic practices; in everyday life they are inextricably intertwined. liberalism ideological practices make the contradictions between lived experience and the theory disappear by not addressing them. as a later example will illustrate in more detail, the pervasive liberal conception of equality carries a highly specific meaning which is much narrower than other conceptions of equality. one common illustration of the breadth in the potential meaning of equality is posed as the difference between equality of opportunity and equality of condition. the everyday experience of people often points up the contradictions between the purpose of ideological practice and reality, but there remains albeit a limited and selective "truth" to the practice nevertheless. the liberal subject is thus formally free and formally equal; these formalisms are supported by selectively chosen examples (the fords, horatio alger and other dead white males that are part of the cultural baggage of the americas) which are used to illustrate that "anyone can make it". it is true that these individuals have succeeded; what is ideological in the use of the examples is that the vast majority of hard working people do not make it, and cannot, for structural reasons. pervasive though it is, liberalism should be understood as having developed out of a particular historical conjuncture and as a result it embodies a set of practices which are historically specific. so often today analyses utilise a totalizing discourse which confers an almost transhistorical status to the liberal status quo. one of the main tenets of liberalism is that all individuals are equal before the law; this postulate establishes the grounds for another liberal principal, that of, equality of opportunity. in our society, however, the belief in not only the ideal but also the practice of equality of opportunity (and this practice has some major flaws) has served to both obscure and legitimate in significant ways inequality of condition. since liberal theory posits that all people are free individuals abstracted from society and history, as it were, anyone can simply be or do anything one wants given the proper motivation. women's oppression in this case may be conceived of as their own fault and the familiar practice of blaming the victim is reinforced. 47 liberal feminists contend that women's subordination is reproduced through traditional (i.e. non-western and therefore by definition non-rational or illiberal) values and their concomitant social structures. this position has certain idealist tendencies which have important consequences for the kinds of political strategies or policy goals that are suggested. in her discussion of liberal feminism (in particular the wid school) , asoka bandarage makes reference to the kinds of social and economic strategies of this kind of analysis, similar to liberal thinkers in the west, wid thinkers seek this [primarily economic] integration [of women] through legal measures and changes in attitude. to this end many conferences, declarations and legislation including the un decade for women (1984:498). there is a problem with these strategies; to the extent that they spend a great deal of time and energy on the changing of attitudes they neglect the more fundamental problem of material conditions. even legislation, in and of itself, does little to address this problem as has been seen throughout the world where women in industrialised liberal democracies who enjoy de jure equal rights remain marginal in terms of ownership and control of resources . capitalism capitalism is a mode of production which entails a variety of ideological practices. my discussion of capitalism is very much tied to the preceding section on liberalism because the two are inextricably linked historically, as such, in this section i make frequent reference to both liberalism and capitalism. the point of departure for critical, gendered analyses of capitalist society is engel's treatment of gender inequality in the origin of the family, private property and the state . in this work engels drew from notes written by both he and marx while reflecting on the work of lewis henry morgan who wrote extensive empirical researches on the iroquois in new york (leacock, 1973:9). while morgan was interested in how change occurred in terms of social relations and ultimately developed a typology of stages of human history supporting the unilinear evolutionary theory of his day, engels had quite a different use for morgan's empirical data. he used morgan's work as a basis upon which to develop a more consistent and theoretically informed, materialist understanding of the question of the social change from so-called primitive society onward. leacock points out that the issues raised by both morgan and engels remain the concern of many scholars today. socialist feminist scholars like mies (1982;1986) and eisenstein (1979:43) acknowledge the importance of many of engels' insights, but reformulate his question about the origins of gender inequality in such a way that it serves to explain the ongoing problem of women's subordination. that is, they ask how women's subordination is 48 reproduced and attempt to get at questions of reproduction, and the legitimation of subordination. in a context of regional underdevelopment, distinct from, but in many ways similar to, that experienced by women and the broader working class in the third world, connelly and macdonald make the another important link between capitalism and women's subordination, working class households here always required more than the male wage and [...] women here always contributed to the family household either by intensifying their domestic labour in the home, by earning money through an informal econojny, or by participating in the labour force and earning a wage themselves (in porter , 1987 : 47 ) . since in many cases women's work has been in the home it has remained invisible (and was considered private, domestic and nonproductive). when they have gone, or do go, from the household to sell their labour power women's work has, however, been devalued. it has become apparent that this enabled capitalists to exploit women's labour to an even greater extent than has traditionally been the case with men's. the most important international example of this is found in the burgeoning maquiladoras of mexico; however, the same strategies are in evidence around the world (elson and pearson, 1981:92). in part this is where the practice of patriarchal relations is important, but this is the focus of an ensuing section. in terms of the focus on capitalist production what the above quotation leaves out is the fact that women contribute directly to what is generally thought to be their husband's fishing enterprise. the fact that this is largely ignored may be a result of the structural invisibility of the woman's contribution to what i and others argue must be recognized as the household's fishing enterprise -not just that of the male fisher (see klein and davis, 1988:31-33). this broader perspective on the fishing operation, one that is based in the household unit of production, would be a positive step in challenging the false dichotomy of the public/private work worlds where one is viewed as productive and the other is regarded as natural (mies, 1982:2-3). in canada, for example, the public/private split only occurred with the development of capitalism and eventually with the de facto privatization of land across the country. popular knowledge of this is, however, limited and there seems to be the broad based perception that the public-male/private-female split has always been the way social life has been organized. once the land was claimed immigrants could no longer go out and enter subsistence production where men and women living in households worked together or separately, but almost always from the household (household production for use-value). they were forced to find work as 49 labour for capitalist enterprises or government inf rastructural projects which ultimately were built to the great benefit of capital . several of the characteristics of liberalism were taken up and utilized in the development of capitalism. one example of the interconnectedness of capitalism and liberalism is the particular usage or definition of the concept of equality. capitalist practice and its ideological use thus overlaps with liberalism (they are in agreement). each shares the ideal of equality, but as mina davis caulfield points out, the conception of equality which they share has a culturally specific and consequently a very limited meaning. equality, was inextricable from the concept of individual achievement in 'free' competition, and never included (except among socialist theorists) the idea of any kind of equal sharing of societal products (1981:202-203). caulfield elaborates further on how this cultural ideal of equality (and the widespread belief in this particular definition of equality as the only possible one) acts to conceal the extreme inequality inherent in capitalist society. she offers an important critique of the capitalist definition of equality. what caulfield does not bring out is the connection between the capitalist and liberal definitions of equality. fundamentally they rely on a definition of equality which targets equality of opportunity and not that of condition. equality of opportunity focuses, as caul field makes ,clear , on the freedom of individuals to compete for unequal rewards'. the individualist emphasis in capitalism is in many ways an outgrowth of the same emphasis in liberalism which conceives of individuals as existing prior to, or as jaggar says, "in abstraction from" a society. this leads to the faulty assumption that individuals' needs can be fulfilled without any real impact on others (1983:29). another contradiction between capitalism and liberalism is apparent when we look at the idea that, in liberal theory, inequality can be eliminated or minimized through reform. from this conceptualization, liberal theory legitimates inequality by suggesting that inequality is an aberration that can be eliminated through education, attitudinal changes, legal reforms and intervention projects (bandarage, 1984:499) none of which broach the problem of inequality as a structural imperative of capitalism (bandarage, 1984 : 500) . both caulfield and bandarage bring out important criticisms of liberal theory and capitalism which illustrate how each established beliefs and practices which, understood in culturally specific ways, serve to legitimate the structure of inequality. mies points out several major contradictions of capitalism when she discusses the approach which she advocates (socialist feminism) in opposition to the dominant, capitalist and patriarchal 50 practices. first she points out the ideological nature of the dominant definition of work. it is thus necessary, regarding the concept of the productivity of labour, to reject its narrow definition and to show that labour can only be productive in the sense of producing surplus value as long as it can tap, extract, exploit, and appropriate labour which is spent in the production of life or subsistence production which is largely non-wage labour done by women (mies, 1982:3). what mies argues here and elsewhere is that traditionally defined "women's work" is the fundamental precondition of all other work including that involved in capital accumulation. women, then, can be conceived of as productive and exploited even though they appear external to the direct processes of capital accumulation. in fact they are not external, but are intimately connected to the system through their labour. to the extent that women's work is considered private and nonproductive their subordination under capitalism is reproduced through a systematic ignorance of the material base of the actual system; it therefore becomes, as mies points out, "a mystification" (1982:4) which legitimates women's subordination, thus the practice is ideological. classical or orthodox marxist accounts of productive work also offer little room for analyses of work which does not take place under the classical capitalist relations of production: where surplus value is directly extracted from the labour of the dispossessed worker. other forms of work which do not directly produce surplus value as a result fail to pass the test of the definition of "productivity". as has been pointed out this is often the bulk of the work done by women. the effect of defining work in this way is important in terms of reproducing the subordination of women because it reinforces the widespread dualistic notion of private and public work stratified by gender. there are those who argue that the underlying use of dualisms (i.e., as in the work of levi-strauss) is itself a product of male modes of analysis (daly , 1978: 11) . however, the use of dualisms often relies on naturalistic explanations of gender differences which see, for example, the family and women's traditional role within it as products of biological differences and therefore their legitimation relies on a functional analysis of nature shaping the human social order (barrett ,1985 : 199) . the ideological practice of patriarchy in the broadest terms, patriarchal ideological practices may be defined as social relations in which women tend to exist in an unequal and subordinate power relation vis a vis men. in explaining patriarchal relations the view that male dominance is biologically determined is widespread among both anti-feminists and feminists. anti-feminists see women's subordination (although they 51 would not call it that) as designed by nature; therefore; it cannot even be conceived as oppressive ( jaggar , 1983 : 88-89) . antifeminists often adopt a scientific discourse to explain women's inequality as natural. in gough's analysis she unmasks the implications of such naturalistic, and biologically determinist, theories ; a "scientific" argument which states that all such features of female inferiority are instinctual is a powerful weapon in maintaining the traditional family with male dominance (gough, 1975:58). gough is critical of anthropologists who attempt to establish a scientific basis for a theory of gender inequality in humans; however, the critique works equally well when applied to capitalism because it is under capitalism that the rational, scientific model heavily influenced by the ideological practice of patriarchy, has been largely developed and tested. radical feminists like firestone (1970) and brownmiller (1976) also consider biology to be the determining factor in their own analyses of, for example, the division of labour by sex and rape respectively. a variety of criticisms have been levelled at analyses which favour biological determinism. among the most problematic assumptions made by those who accept biological determinism is the fact that such a position makes social change highly unlikely if not impossible because of the "fact" of this biological or natural inequality. in her discussion of the lacemakers of narsapur, maria mies shows how the system of capitalist production built upon previously existing patriarchal practices and beliefs to transform the lives of the kapus , a peasant agricultural caste, and some christian women. as the industry developed women became segregated in the production jobs while men captured the jobs of agents -which gave them access to the actual site where the value of the women's labour was realized. in this way the women's labour was exploited. the reason that was given for women's exclusion from the activity of agent was that they were not mobile enough since, among other things, they could not ride bicycles due to local social traditions (1982:10). such beliefs about what is socially acceptable are effective ideological and material barriers to women's emancipation, the tenacity with which women cling to these oppressive [patriarchal] norms, because they are symbols of a bygone higher status ... is the ideological and psychological base on which a new phase of exploitation can be built (mies, 1982:13). similar methods of social control and gender oppression are evident in the fisher society of atlantic canada. one researcher 52 relates how women in the fishing communities of newfoundland formerly had a higher status because their work was more directly related to production, the older women are guided by the past in much the same way as the men, and they too defer to the identity of "fisherman" ... their role as fishermen's wives has vanished. not only are there no fish to be dried on flakes [drying racks], but virtually all other aspects of their past lives have gone as well (porter, 1988:175). the tendency to want a return to the old norms which guided life is evident as porter indicates. we must recognize, however, that such practices offer hierarchical, gender inegalitarian based definitions of women and men. for example, the idea that the man is the head of the household in fisher society, as in india, legitimates such things as the knowledge that women's sphere of activity is in the house, and more broadly, it can legitimate the unequal gender division of labour. finally, it is in evident that material interests underlie these ideological practices. although porter makes useful reference to the desire to maintain the norms of a bygone era, i think she over-states the case when she says that "virtually all other aspects of their lives have gone as well". in the past women's labour may have been more visibly a part of the fisher household's production . in contrast to porter what i am emphasizing here is the extent to which women's labour remains an indispensable, albeit ignored, component of contemporary household production. women in small boat fisher households are not left with nothing to do, rather with the concentration on production for exchange-value, women's labour (connected to the household's fishery activities) has become less visible, but it has not ended. to expand on this, i would suggest that the development of capitalism has distorted the labour processes of women such that the content of their labour has changed, but not necessarily the amount. they have in some cases been left with a much less public role within the family of the fishing household; for example, most fish processing is now done in specialized processing plants -that job, as a productive household or community -based activity, is no longer available. since processing work is almost always seasonal women's public exposure through this sort of work changes accordingly. the point here is that while the demands of capitalism have changed the process of production immensely, it has left women in a less powerful position, but not a less integral one. 53 southwest nova scotia's "independent" small boat fishers: culture and class in a harsh environment in this section i will examine another ideological practice which helps to legitimate and reproduce the subordination of women in various parts of the atlantic provinces. the sub-region of southwest nova scotia is of interest here as a kind of precursory case study. the dominant ideological practice in southwest nova scotia, especially prevalent in the powerful fishing community (fishers, processors and suppliers inclusive), comprises a brand of laissez-faire capitalist and petty bourgeois production (clement, 1986). this practice is distinctly free enterprise in relation to the rest of the province and the region. in practice however, even southwest nova scotia's fishers analyze the system based on their own constellation of interests and objectives. like other groups they selectively reject laissez-faire policies when it is in their interests to do so. in instances where fishers have felt threatened by a particular group or perhaps a state policy they have mobilized in order to circumvent the strictly laissez-faire operation of the market. special social programs represent the most obvious state interventions taken at the behest of fishers; examples include, special loans for vessel replacement and unemployment insurance considerations, but virtually all state policies affect the market in some way. under such circumstances fisher families, like many other actors in the economy, are often unwilling participants in a hegemonic practice, namely capitalism and they attempt to make the best of their situation -sometimes successfully, sometimes not. as explained earlier, small boat fishing tends to be gender stratified activity with men tending to do the fishing and women being involved in a variety of on-shore labour processes. typically, a male fisher has formal ownership of the boat and crews are made up of family members whenever possible. otherwise close friends or neighbours crew boats on a share of the catch basis (clement, 1986:27,29,32; brym and sacouman, 1979). in his discussion of some of the contradictions between fishers' view of their work and the reality of their work, davis clearly gives his analysis of the contribution that the fishing labour process makes toward the fisher's ideological practice of independence, fishing boats and gear are formally the property of their users. the units of production are self-contained smallscale and individually operationalized in an often risky environment. all of the work tasks in each unit of production are generally completed by its crew members. fishing incomes are solely derived from the production strategies and the expenditures of each unit of production. in short, small boat fishing is in many ways characterized by the independence and the individuality of each crew. moreover, attributes of production strategies lend a sense of inter-boat competition to some 54 of the activities, e.g., lobster fishing. the fishermen's ideology of self reliance and rugged individualism is in these ways reflective of aspects of their real experiences (1984:435). fishers clearly have a material basis for the ideological practice of individualism and "independence". however, it has been constructed on a highly selective basis. the influence of patriarchal practice is evident in davis' quotation in that the work task description has excluded virtually all work that does not take place at sea. again, in the highly gender stratified society of the fishing communities this, by definition, excludes most, if not all, of the work women do. by ignoring the contribution of women the ideological practice of independence is reproduced along with women's subordination. the labour process, as just outlined, is one characterized in some instances by autonomy or "selfdependence", but not independence. it is true that fishers decide when, how, where, and how hard to work. they do not make, however, these "autonomous" decisions as though they were extracted from the exigencies of daily survival as fishers or as members of households -outside forces affect their decisions and these include the need to turn a profit which in practice translates into catching enough fish, and selling it, at the going rate of fish per kilogram or tonne to reproduce the enterprise. women's role in affecting the decisions that fishers make have also traditionally been ignored by scholars (porter, 1987:45) as well as by the state and capital. at the level of the market where oligoponistic and paternalistic relations abound (kearney, 1983) between fishers (sellers) and merchants (buyers/processors) the ideological practice of independence ceases to function. in that context the bases of the fisher's sense of independence, the product of their labour, and the romantic, idealist notions of fisher "independence" produced in patriarchal culture and folklore are unmasked before the harsh material forces of market exchange. the glorification of the male culture of fishers is an important part of the ideological practice in the maritimes where the male culture is often characterized as engaged in a taming the natural "she-world". the peculiar strain of the ideological practice characteristic of southwest nova scotia, with its perhaps more adamant than average free enterprise position, is more completely understood when we also consider the cultural ties or the historical linkages between the area and new england. the local adherence to the individualism of laissez-faire capitalism is, in effect, a function of these two primary influences -the material base of fishers at the level of labour process and the new england connection. new england's historical economic and cultural \ideological domination of southwest nova scotia established conditions which clearly fostered a cultural climate amenable to their free enterprise practice. 55 in the market exchange the unequal and antagonistic nature of relations (fishers dependent on a few buyers for the purchase of their catch) is de-emphasized in the local culture; instead, paternalistic relations between them often legitimate these inequalities in conjunction h^-th the hegemonic ideological practices: capital ism/ 1 iberalism. fishers are relevant here in two particular respects. first, fishers' labour is commodified in the fish that is caught, consequently when they sell their fish they are actually, at some level, selling their labour power. in the same labour process women's organizational labour is also commodified in the fish which is caught; this is so because their labour is socially necessary. socially necessary labour or abstract labour, as opposed to individual labour in any given firm, is defined in terms of units of time and entails "the labour time required to produce any use-value under the conditions of production normal for a given society" (marx, 1986:46-47). we also know that marx and many others regard certain practices as productive which at first glance do not seem to be. consider, for example, the case of manufacturing. actual manufacturing is proceeded by organizational labour processes in which raw materials must be purchased, the labour that goes into this is thus socially necessary, as is women's organizational labour in the fisher household. furthermore the distribution of the product is regarded as productive. so too i would argue is organizational labour in fishing which is broader than the simple labour process of casting nets or laying traps and later pulling them in. nevertheless, the value of a commodity appears only as the exchange ratio between the commodity in question and the money commodity in a particular exchange and at the time of sale the social relations which produced the commodity are not readily apparent, except to the producer. in this way women's labour is obscured through a form of commodity fetishism. that is, the sales transaction is allowed to reify relations between commodities, while relations between producers and buyers are conceptualized as free transactions uncumbered by enduring social relations of either a classed or gendered character. secondly, because of the oligoponistic nature of the fish markets, which are inextricably linked to and are part of the capitalist system, "freedom" is limited to such an extent that it is equated with coercion, i.e., sell on the oligoponistic market, even if you are not being paid the real value for your fish, or get out of the industry. the fisher, and for that matter the entire household, is in a position similar to that of any other worker under capitalism. they are freely compel led to sell their labour (commodified in the fish they catch) or not sell it and take no income . one other important characteristic of the ideological practice of independence is the underlying misogyny which structures the gendered division of labour. for a variety of local cultural reasons women rarely take part in the fishing (porter, 1988:170; 56 davis, 1984). several instances of this are noted in faris (1972:73). for example, women may not be permitted to set foot on the boat for fear of "polluting" the vessel for the day. such social prohibitions additionally serve to perpetuate women's devalued and subordinated status within the household by clearly situating the means of production in the hands of the male. the fact that women's contribution to their household's fishing enterprise is minimized or ignored completely is, as i have argued, partly a manifestation of the hegemonic ideological practices discussed in the first section and also the local fisher variant. there is relatively little work done on what i have termed here the "ideological practice of independence" specific to atlantic fishers. one of its most striking facets is the exclusion of women from its analysis and the lack of attention to women's work which contributes directly to the fishing enterprise of the household. it is slowly becoming recognized that, historically, women's labour was important in the mercantilist (or salt-cod) era of fishing. ellen antler wrote an important piece on women's historical, though often hidden contribution, to production in the newfoundland fisheries as well as producing a wide variety of use values for subsistence. in it she estimated, that the process of drying fish added $2400 (1950 values) to the value of the seasons catch in labrador, and $15002000 (1969 values) in conception bay. in all antler suggested women contribute around 35% of the family income in direct, measurable economic values (porter;1987:45) . equally important as porter indicates is the fact that antler's analysis finally made visible the economic activity of rural women which, to that point, had been ignored by male analysts. however recognizing past sins is easier than admitting those of the present. nevertheless recognition is slowly emerging as to the extent of the contribution to the fisher household by women today (connelly and macdonald, 1990). since there is little research that deals specifically with the issue of women's labour in fishing, empirical evidence of their participation is difficult to locate. my own research points to some trends already mentioned. during field work in the summer of 1989 i was able to discuss with a lobster fisher, albeit superficially, the question of the household as a unit of production and the gendered division of labour that existed therein. in this discussion, the male fisher while admitting that his spouse's labour was important attempted to minimize it by making light of it: ps: when you do your income tax or your inventory of how much you've spent on equipment ... does your wife do that? 57 fisher: oh yeah she does it ... in fact she gets paid year round for doing it ... she gets to live with me. (southwest nova scotia interviews, june 23, 1989). the underlying relations of ruling are made apparent and the ideological practice of independence is shown to be in effect even at the level of casual conversation. unfortunately what barely gets recognized in the informal context of casual conversation is ever more difficult to recognize and legitimate in public discourse . subsistence activities were undertaken by each partner during other times of the year, but during the fishing season both partners, not only the male, contributed to the fishing enterprise. the woman i spoke with did what she modestly called "book-keeping" and was therefore instrumental in terms of budgeting, maintenance decisions, crew payment and outfitting (i.e. equipment purchasing). the problem of recognition, however, requires discussion in a theoretical light which will make visible that which much past theoretical and empirical work made invisible. additional fieldwork is planned to explore this. women's labour is commodified in the fish they make it possible to catch. what i attempt to highlight is the diversity of labour processes which are included in the term "domestic labour"; and the way in which this term slides women's decidedly productive labour into the category of unproductive or domestic labour. through this i attempt to problematize fisher women's productive and reproductive labour and sketch the kinds of considerations that must inform a fully developed analysis. the requirement therefore is to begin to recognize and value women's decidedly productive labour and to formally differentiate it from other domestic labour while at the same time attempting to change the fact of women's sole responsibility for domestic labour. in terms of the ideological practice of independence, the women of fisher households are caught in a difficult position. their unpaid work is not recognized as contributing to fishing and as long as their work is not recognized as productive they remain subordinate in the household unit of production. conclusion at the level of praxis, women are developing strategies which may begin to break down the exploitative elements of the ideological practice of independence. one such strategy would be to take an active part in gaining recognition of their work. this might be done at the individual level by encouraging more women to go to the dock side to be part of the fish sales process. in this way women would be part of the process in which the value of the catch is realized; their contribution would be concretized. i think this might be a significant material change in circumstances. it would perhaps change the woman's role from that of isolated, 58 powerless and dependent worker in the household domain to that of equal partner/actor in the realization of the household's material well-being. initially such a transformation would have to be negotiated at the level of the individual . notwithstanding some imminent structural transformation in both gender and class relations it seems to me to merit some consideration. this practice of course has been happening in some areas (clark, 1988:267) and it has an admittedly double-edged characteristic. while it would help to concretize the labour of the women it adds yet another task to women's already double-burdening responsibility for reproductive labour in the home. another facet of this strategy would have to include a redistribution of reproductive domestic labour -not an easy challenge. as in the gloucester example, women may establish their own organization where they could act at a political level in their own and their household's interests. another possible strategy might be for women to struggle for a place within the local fisher's associations or the maritime fishermen's union (mfu). at present the mfu only allows certain types of fishers in the union and all of them actually have to be "doing fishing"; however, some other fishing unions encompass both "shore/plant" and "at sea" workers (e.g., nffawu -newfoundland fisherman, food and allied workers union). if this approach were adopted the union would have a greatly expanded membership. on the other hand it would have to begin to address the very real issue of women's subordination in fisher households. 59 endnotes 1. thanks are due to jared keil and mary-anne kandrack for comments on early and later drafts respectively. 2. for a variety of positions discussing the meaning of underdevelopment in atlantic canada see brym and sacouman, 1979. 3. things ideological here are defined in a way that has been termed critical by thompson who points out that ideology "is essentially linked to the process of sustaining asymmetrical relations of power that is the process of maintaining domination" (1984:4). 4. dorothy smith (1990) calls these "relations of ruling" and others have different names for such relations. see armstrong and armstrong (1990); thompson (1984). 5. women in development (wid) . 6. jaggar (1983:62) points out the contradiction inherent in the liberal focus on equality of opportunity; equal opportunity to compete for unequal rewards is impossible to achieve as long as rewards are conspicuously unequal. 7. initial fish processing work used to be organized and controlled by women in a community based labour process. 8. although the capitalist mode of production and its many underlying practices derived from the practice of the theory of liberalism this is not to say that the two are, in fact, unproblematical ly compatible. see for example mcpherson on the contradictions between capitalism and democracy. in practice liberalism has clearly served as a legitimating force for capitalism. 9. as noted in a previous example mies gives of the prohibitions that certain women should not ride bicycles. 60 references armstrong, pat and hugh armstrong. the double ghetto: canadian women and their segregated work . toronto: mcclelland and stewart, 1978. bandarage, asoka. "women in development: liberalism, marxism and marxist feminism." development and change , 15 (october ): 495-515, 1984. brownmiller, susan. against our will: men, women and rape . new york: bantam, 1976. brunton, r., j. overton, and j. sacouman. "uneven underdevelopment and song: culture and development in atlantic canada." in l. salter (ed.), communication studies in canada . toronto: butterworth, 1981. brym, robert j. and r. james sacouman eds . underdevelopment and social movements in atlantic canada . toronto: new hogtown press, 1979. clark, margaret-elwyn. "managing uncertainty: family religion and collective action among fishermen's wives in gloucester, massachusetts." in jane nadel-klein and dona lee davis, to work and to weep: women in fishing economies . st. john's, nfld.:iser, 1988. connelly, patricia and martha macdonald. "women's domestic work and wage labour in a nova scotia community." studies in political economy , (10):45-72, 1983. "class and gender in fishing communities in nova scotia." studies in political economy , (30):61-85, 1990 daly, mary. gyn/ecology: the metaethics of radical feminism . boston: beacon, 1978. davis, anthony. " 'you're your own boss: an economic anthropology of small boat fishing in port lameron harbour, southwest nova scotia." ph.d. thesis. halifax: dalhousie university, 1984. eisenstein, zillah, r. (ed.). capitalist patriarchy and the case for socialist feminism . new york: monthly review press, 1979. elson, diane and ruth pearson. "'nimble fingers make cheap workers': an analysis of women's employment in third world manufacturing." feminist review 7 (spring) : 87-107 , 1981. engels, frederick. the origin of the family, private property and the state . eleanor leacock ed., new york: international publishers, 1973. 61 faris, james c. cat harbour: a newfoundland fishing settlement . memorial university of newfoundland: printed by university of toronto press, 1972. firestone, shulamith. the dialectic of sex: the case for feminist revolution . new york: william morrow, 1970. gough, kathleen. "the origin of the family." in rayna r. reiter (ed.) toward an anthropology of women . new york: monthly review press, 1975. gramsci, antonio. in mouffe, "hegemony and ideology in gramsci." in tony bennet et al . , culture, ideology and social process . london: batsfords, 1987. hartmann, heidi. "capitalism, patriarchy, and job segregation by sex." in zillah eisenstein (ed.). capitalist patriarchy and the case for socialist feminism . new york and london: monthly review press, 1979. jaggar, alison m. feminist politics and human nature . sussex: the harvester press, 1983. kearney, john. "common tragedies: a study of resource access in the bay of fundy herring fisheries", unpublished master's thesis, department of environmental studies, dalhousie university , halifax, nova scotia, 1983. leacock, eleanor ed., "introduction" in frederick engels the origin of the family. private property and the state . new york: international publishers, 1973. marx, karl. capital . moscow: progress publishers, 1986. mcpherson, c.b. democratic theory: essays in retrieval . oxford: clarendon press, 1973. mies, maria. patriarchy and accumulation on a world scale: women in the international division of labour . london and atlantic highlands, n.j.: zed books, 1986. _"the dynamics of the sexual division of labour and integration of rural women into the world market." in lourdes beneria (ed. ) women and development: the sexual division of labour in rural societies . new york: praeger, 1982. mouffe, chantal . "hegemony and ideology in gramsci." in culture. ideology and social process . london: batsford, 1987. porter, marilyn. "women and old boats: the sexual division in a newfoundland outport." in arlene tigar mclaren ed . gender and society: creating a canadian women's sociology , 1988. 62 "peripheral women: towards a feminist analysis of the atlantic region." studies in political economy , (23):41-71, 1987. smith, dorothy. conceptual practices of power: a feminist sociology of knowledge . toronto: university of toronto press, 1990. thompson, john b. studies in the theory of ideology . berkeley: university of california press, 1984. 63 978-1-926958-01-9 159 reviews book review about canada: animal rights, by john sorenson. black point, nova scotia and winnipeg, manitoba: fernwood publishing company limited, 2010. $17.95 can, paper. isbn: 978-1-55266-356-1. pages: 1-192. reviewed by priscillia lefebvre1 about canada: animal rights is one in a series of books that critically examines vital issues pertaining to social justice, healthcare, and public services in canadian society. john sorenson delivers an extensive analysis of animal rights in canada, which is both extremely disturbing and informative. in his exploration of this important and controversial topic, sorenson provides us with numerous examples of the exploitation and abuse of animals within industry, as well as the sad shortcomings of canadian legislation intended to regulate it. he explains the issue of animal rights in a comprehensive and yet extremely accessible way. because of its broad nature, sorenson does not delve into an exhaustive analysis of any one topic but provides the reader with an excellent overview of the legal, historical, and social issues surrounding animal rights in canada as well as the arguments, misconceptions, and industry propaganda embedded within it. sorenson begins with a discussion of animal rights within the broader social justice movement by remarking that all too often animal rights are disregarded by many otherwise progressive people as a legitimate concern. for many, he explains, animal rights are considered inferior to the widely accepted notion of the hierarchical order of nature in which human beings dominate and take priority over concerns of other species. labeled as pretentious or sentimental, animal rights issues are placed at odds with other struggles instead of being considered central to many sites 1 priscillia lefebvre is a ph.d candidate in the department of sociology & anthropology with a concentration in political economy. she can be reached at plefebvr@connect.carleton.ca about canada: animal rights 160 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research of oppression. sorenson takes issue with this by stating that to view a compassion for the suffering of animals as somehow indicative of a disregard for the suffering of humans is nonsensical and creates a false dichotomy between the two, as if systemic violence towards animals and the environment does not also include an attack on human labour and health under patriarchal capitalism. animal rights activists, to a great extent, are also accused of extremism and called terrorists, mainly pointing to groups such as the animal liberation front, by those who would defend animal exploitation and cruelty under the present system. sorenson likens this socially constructed bifurcation to racism and sexism, ideologies which have been historically used to justify the oppression of marginalized others. sorenson readies his audience for this discussion with the following passage (p.11): capitalism involves exploitation of animals as well as humans and the profit-motive extends suffering to a broader scale: billions of animals are killed each year in the food, vivisection, fashion, hunting, and entertainment industries. mistreatment of animals is shaped by systems of oppression that developed over time to maintain profit, privilege and power. sorenson’s abolitionist perspective is based first and foremost on the premise, outlined by gary francione, that animals are to be recognized as having one basic right—the right not to be considered property. all animals are sentient beings who deserve respect and are not to be seen as at the disposal of humans, and for this he makes no apologies. sorenson maintains that the commodification of animals enables their usage by humans to attain whatever ends deemed fit by the owner, be it for profit, labour, experimentation or otherwise. he details accounts of the gruesome activities taking place in industrial meat production, factory farming, and in the slaughter of cows, pigs, chickens as well as the production of more so-called upscale delicacies such as duck foie gras, marine animals, and exotic meats. he explores animals being tortured and abused for entertainment purposes and sport such as in hunting, rodeos, horse-racing, circuses, and zoos. sorenson also speaks of the ugliness of the pet industry in his examples of puppy mills, as well as cases of extreme animal cruelty on the part of pet owners and individuals. he also refers to and provides examples of the redundancy and ineffectualness of animal research in canada. although reading numerous accounts of violence and excruciating pain being inflicted on animals does not make for an enjoyable read per se, it is an important one for those willing to confront the truly horrible production methods of what we, as a society, consume on a daily basis. sorenson reestablishes the links between animal and human suffering through a survey of the detrimental role that animal exploitation and the killing of animals for profit plays in capitalist colonial expansion. he argues that animal rights issues 161 must be integrated as part of the greater ecological and economic crisis by interrogating the animal industry’s contribution to serious threats to human survival such as global warming and starvation. corporate interests will never allow for animal rights as that would interfere with their profits. to combat this, corporations have invested millions of dollars, a significant portion of which comes from taxpayers awarded through government subsidies, in public relations propaganda. for example, sorenson outlines the opportunistic use of indigenous people by the fur industry as marketing tools to promote themselves as preserving canada’s rich cultural heritage and supporting traditional ways of living by paying aboriginal fur-trappers next to nothing for the bloody work of killing animals. many would say this relationship is far more representative of canada’s tradition of colonization and genocide of indigenous people than it is of respecting or preserving aboriginal culture. lending to the strength of his arguments, particularly when speaking of canada’s indefensible seal hunt, he also lays out the irrationality of much of the animal industry’s practices not only in moral, but economic terms. in doing so, he calls into question the sustainability of such practices and explores who really profits from them. in most cases, such as the seal hunt, it is fur industry corporations who lobby the federal government’s department of fisheries and oceans to continue defending the mass killing of seals under the guise of job creation for off-season fishermen and animal population control, even in the face of embarrassing international public anger and costly boycotts. ironically, this also follows the same orwellian logic that conservation through culling initiatives propagate in that in order to preserve animals we must kill them. sorenson also points out that, in reality, these brutal annual practices only account for a tiny fraction of income for labourers, while producing hazardous consequences for the ocean’s ecosystem and costing governments several times more money to orchestrate than it generates. in fact, one gets the impression that it would be cheaper to cancel the hunt altogether and just give sealers the money they make during this mass killing outright. as the fur market declines, it would seem that the seal hunt, referred to by many as ‘canada’s shame,’ is only lucrative for the commercial fur industry. in the final chapter, sorenson presents veganism as the only ethical choice when facing an industry bent on such cruelty and total disregard for the wellbeing of both animals and humans; an industry inflicting countless long-term harms on the environment in search of profit. however, his call for veganism as a (at least partial) solution fails in part due to the lack of addressing the shortcomings of following a vegan lifestyle without examining other forms of exploitation that, on its own, veganism does not address. problems surrounding grain production and other foods under capitalist industrial agriculture that are not animal based, for example. about canada: animal rights 162 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research where does veganism situate itself, in the resistance of not only animal exploitation but human exploitation as well, in the import of fruits and other foods from countries such as the philippines and costa rica grown under extremely oppressive, dangerous, and environmentally harmful conditions, not to mention the use of migrant labour in canada’s own fruit and vegetable production? sorenson’s call for veganism would have been much stronger had he clarified this point. nor does sorenson problematize his call for eco-tourism as an alternative to safari-style vacationing as a colonial practice in itself which often requires the appropriation and ‘clearing’ of land already in use by indigenous people in order to prepare it for viewing as a pristine wilderness. in my opinion, these are vital topics for discussion if we are not to simply trade one oppression for another in an attempt to, as sorenson himself would say, “salve our consciences.” that said, about canada: animal rights provides an excellent overview of this issue, as well as its far-reaching implications and vital place within the broader movement for social justice for all. whole book pdf book review: missing women, missing news | 291 book review missing women, missing news: covering crisis in vancouver’s downtown eastside, by david hugill. black point, ns: fernwood publishing, 2010. $17.95 cad., paper. isbn: 9781552663776. pages: 1-111. reviewed by ryan boyd1 in missing women, missing news, david hugill offers an insightful and critical study of the national newspaper coverage of the crisis of missing women in vancouver’s downtown eastside that followed through the proceedings against robert pickton, a critique of police responses to the crisis, and an analysis of the roles of the federal, provincial, and municipal governments in creating the socioeconomic conditions of the downtown eastside. hugill charges journalists and police as missing in action after sixty women, most of them sex workers, from this neighbourhood were murdered between 1978 and 2002. on the one hand, he criticizes journalists because mainstream news coverage of the crisis did not appear until 1998. on the other hand, he criticizes police for their contempt and negligence: “at best, they failed to notice. at worst, they failed to care” (p. 10). hugill argues that the narrative combining down on their luck women, a psychotic serial killer, and bad policing cannot satisfactorily explain why this crisis was ignored for so long. this prudent and topical study reveals the complexity of what was presented as a simple narrative and reassigns the culpability of the crisis to the state. the crux of hugill’s argument is that news coverage generally offered uncomplicated reasons why these women were neglected and victimized. media reasoning positioned the local vancouver police as the negligent party and the women as victims of pickton alone. hugill’s focus is to reconsider these partial yet dominant explanations by examining additional layers of complexity (p. 22). hugill explores the historically, politically and culturally pervasive reasons why this crisis was ignored for so long. the state should be implicated as structuring and perpetuating the vulnerability of these women through the lingering impact of 1  ryan boyd is a master’s candidate at the department of sociology and anthropology, carleton university (ottawa, canada). 292 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times colonialism, prostitution laws and policing patterns, the lack of a federal housing plan, and continued funding cutbacks for social programs directly impacting vancouver’s downtown eastside. his consideration of ideology as the primary force of shaping the logic of these narratives is his contribution to several studies already covering the mishandling of the crisis. chapter 1 examines the initial limitations of the media coverage and explanations for the crisis, as well as their lasting effects. hugill’s research reveals that newspapers reported that the crisis was largely neglected for two decades because of the negligence of the local vancouver police department (p. 24). this emerged as the central theme for explaining the crisis in the media. drawing from stuart hall, hugill suggests that local police negligence became the “primary interpretation” of the crisis, thereby limiting the physical space and parties responsible for the crisis at the local level. this is problematic for hugill as this interpretation defines both the sources and solutions at the local level, meaning “the narratives of newspapers mask the larger contradictions about the universality of state protection” (p. 24). this primary interpretation sets an ideological limit for the other narratives that would follow. while hugill commends journalists for implicating local authorities and their role in perpetuating the crisis, he argues that ultimately these groups were the only ones held accountable and that the structural conditions set by the state were neglected. chapter 2 is devoted to the role of the state in fostering the conditions that both produced and imperiled marginalized women in british columbia. hugill writes that the state is responsible for producing the structural conditions that put these women in danger in three central ways: (1) sweeping retrenchments of state systems of social solidarity beginning in 1983; (2) amendments to the criminal code targeted at curbing street prostitution; and (3) the persistent effects of state colonial policy (p. 32). the retrenchment of the state occurred in three distinct periods, beginning in 1983 with provincial budget cuts that “hollowed out social services” (p. 35). the liberal federal government attacked social services again during the 1990s. hugill argues that declining federal support both forced and inspired provincial liberals to further reduce spending beginning in 2001, resulting in the “single deepest cuts to social spending in canadian history” (p. 37). with this information in hand, hugill engages with his media analysis and discovers that newspapers report overwhelmingly that women engage in prostitution to support their drug addictions. despite the reality that many women book review: missing women, missing news | 293 engage in sex work as a way to supplement reduced or precarious incomes, this reporting has helped produce an ideological conflation with “drug addict” and “prostitute” (p. 39). changes to the canadian criminal code under brian mulroney in 1985 resulted in pushing already vulnerable women into the unseen margins of the downtown eastside and forcing them to work in relative isolation from one another. these changes impeded sex workers from forming cohesive community that could share information about bad dates and pressured them into making quicker, less-informed decisions about their clients. yet, only six out of 157 articles studied covering the crisis were critical of these sanctions.2 hugill’s layered work has the potential to inform current debates in prostitution laws, in which the federal government and provincial government of ontario are appealing an ontario superior court ruling that dismissed laws against keeping a common bawdy house, communicating for the purposes of prostitution and living on the avails of the trade (jones 2011). in a critical analysis of the racial component of the state’s culpability of endangering sex workers, hugill’s study finds that only thirteen of 157 newspaper articles acknowledged that a significant proportion of missing women were aboriginal (p. 47). despite coverage that goes beyond just-the-facts reporting, trying to invoke some deeper meaning to the crisis, journalists overlooked an abundance of research and statistics from well-established authorities that “clearly demonstrates the disproportionate burden of social suffering carried by aboriginal people in this neighbourhood” (p. 47). hugill questions why this central factor was neglected despite a number of credible sources for answers. his answer is in canadian commonsense ideology. our image of canada as a fair, democratic, and tolerant society creates “race blindness” as a by-product of commonsense. this commonsense reasoning posits that racism cannot possibly exist in this type of society, so it is ignored almost outright. with this layer being ignored, newspaper coverage focused mainly on the exotic nature of violence and drugs, the self-imposed risky lifestyle in society’s seedy underbelly, and the presence of a serial killer to add to the well-established coverage of police negligence. chapter 3 focuses on reported images of the missing women and sex workers from the downtown eastside. hugill pays special attention to who is speaking on behalf of missing women and prostitutes and their perceived credibility. hugill suggests that credibility is based on per2  while this is mainly a qualitative study, hugill uses several numerical representations as another way to illustrate the themes in newspaper coverage. 294 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times sonal relationships to victims rather than an understanding of the systemic issues facing the downtown eastside. his study finds that family and friends of missing women were quoted 109 times, advocates and allies of street women were quoted 25 times, and sex workers themselves were quoted 10 times (p. 62). this is indicative of vastly differentiated access to discourse and shows that sex workers were not in the position to describe themselves, but were rather described by others. one critique is that while it is implied, access to discourse is not something that hugill writes about in detail. a second critique is that this analysis also would have been more nuanced if details of quotes from police officers and their role in describing the women and the crisis had been included. when prostitutes were allowed to define themselves it was only to describe their one-dimensional drive for narcotics. hugill notes that each paper reminds its readers that these murdered women were “real people,” but describes them more like caricatures. conflating prostitution with crime makes it appear self-inflicted or self-selected—especially with drug addiction. drawing on hall, hugill suggests that through conflation with drug use, prostitution is criminalized and therefore depoliticized (p. 75). chapter 4 is where hugill’s work in human geography shines through. the aim of this chapter is to detail the ways in which coverage mapped the downtown eastside, using a multitude of images on streetlevel chaos that set the neighbourhood as symbolically distinct and disconnected from the rest of the city. hugill writes, “[t]hough seemingly disconnected, patterns of divestment in the dtes and patterns of geographically specific tolerance of illicit activity offer potent ways to interrogate the hollowness of the claim that vancouver’s inner city has been “taken over” by a degenerate population” (p. 83). here hugill is pointing to the ways in which capital and state interest had slowly disappeared from the area. furthermore, differentiated police presence and enforcement created a zone of tolerance that ultimately neglected missing women, suggesting that their disappearances were part of the transient nature of the job. the coverage of the downtown eastside is described through text and photographs as if it were ground zero of a zombie apocalypse, where the undead exchange sex for drugs with human beings instead of simply eating them. the neighbourhood is framed as “a horrifying hobbesian enclosure where the war of all against all is waged with unyielding fury” (p. 92). no one can be trusted and political intervention is seen as futile. however, hugill’s conclusion suggests that all is not lost. the book review: missing women, missing news | 295 downtown eastside has shown a great deal of leadership, bottom-up resistance, ground-level support, and ingenuity in a number of groundbreaking programs, such as insite, canada’s first safe-injection venue (p. 98). he suggests that sex workers must make changes even if they are not officially sanctioned by the state, such as collective work environments, networks that share bad-date lists, or sex worker unions. they must also push for a venue for safer sex work. these suggestions have partially come to fruition in the aforementioned ontario superior court case ruling, which has seen current and former sex workers advocate for safer conditions. work like missing women, missing news questions commonsense ideology and urges critical thinking. while hugill focuses on vancouver’s downtown eastside, his work is relevant in current debates surrounding prostitution laws, spatial identities of other urban areas with concentrated poverty3, and the residual effects of colonialism in an aboriginal population. the aboriginal population faces structural issues such as systemic poverty, high rates of incarceration, mental health concerns, and loss of culture, among many others, because of canada’s racist history. this history cannot be ignored because of the contemporary commonsense of tolerance. in the case of vastly disparate birthrates, without developing strategies that problematize and work to resolve the negative impacts of colonialism, institutionally and culturally disenfranchised aboriginal communities will continue to grow in a culture of contempt and indifference. references: aboriginal peoples in canada in 2006: inuit, métis and first nations, 2006 census (2008). ottawa: ministry of industry statistics canada. jones, a. (2011, may 4). “sex-trade workers say ottawa trivializing their serious claims in appeal”. maclean’s .ca. retrieved may 18, 2011 from www.macleans.ca/article.jsp?content=n6755746. walks, r. and l. bourne. (2006). “ghettos in canada’s cities? racial segregation, ethnic enclaves and poverty concentration in canadian urban areas”. canadian geographer, 50(3), 273-297 . 3  walks and bourne (2006) report a growing trend of racialized concentrated poverty that suggests a ‘ghettoization’ in major canadian cities, such toronto, saskatoon, and winnipeg. 978-1-926958-01-9 133 culture political poetry lyle daggett1 “political” poetry. all human activity is political because it takes place in a context — the context of history. sending someone a recipe for crab meat salad is one thing if you work food prep in a restaurant kitchen. it means something else if you’re nancy reagan. poets have been political, in some sense of the word, from the earliest beginnings to the present. enheduanna, sumerian poet, priestess of the moon goddess inanna, the earliest poet whose name is known. the chinese government compiled collections of popular folk songs — for example, the shih ching, the book of songs — as a way of learning something about what the people were thinking. (did nixon listen to bob dylan or joan baez or pete seeger? does george bush listen to billy bragg or tracy chapman or rap music?) homer was political. (george bush on the walls of troy.) the bhagavad gita (which j. robert oppenheimer quoted as he watched the first atomic bomb explode in the new mexico desert) was and is political. the plays of aeschylus and sophocles and euripedes were defining forces in greek society. dante and shakespeare were all political. (if dante were writing today, who would he consign to the ninth circle of hell?) the great flowering of art and culture in medieval spain grew originally from the founding of a new umayyad dynasty in exile by survivors of the conquest of damascus by the abbasids. the trouveres and troubadours of medieval france lived in a time of constant upheaval and displacement and continuously shifting political alliances, in which most if not all of them were intimately involved. (many died during the wholesale slaughter that took place during the albigensian crusades, following which troubadour poetry essentially came to a halt.) 1 this work was first published by pemmican press. political poetry 134 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research chaucer was political, tu fu (or du fu) was political, murasaki shikibu was political. andrew marvell, william blake, shelley, keats, byron, whitman, rubén darío, josé martí, yosano akiko. political, in at least some sense of the word. what we’re talking about here is something more specific. we’re talking about poetry that expresses or reflects — either explicitly or at least by suggestion — politics that are left-wing, working-class, populist, or of a similar character. how to combine politics with creative work remains an unsettled question on the political left. this is not simply a question of socialist or communist realism versus whatever else. the widespread stereotype of socialist realism emphasizes the huge public portraits and statues of lenin, stalin, mao, etc., and maybe allows for some murals and poster art of muscle-bound workers in factories and rosy-cheeked starry-eyed young men and women gazing off at the bright horizon of the future. this, again, is the stereotype. but it should be patently obvious that public portraits and monument sculpture, poster art, and so on, comprise only a portion of (and not necessarily the best) of a culture’s art. we cannot judge the effectiveness of socialst realism (or any other artistic movement or tendency of the political left) based only on the more mediocre or homogenized examples. should we judge the art of capitalist societies based only on norman rockwell and mount rushmore? should we judge american literature based on mcguffey’s reader? are these the basis for the prevailing critical standards advocated by the literature and art departments at leading universities? for every norman rockwell there’s a diego rivera, a david siqueiros, a walter crane, a sue coe; for every edgar guest and joyce kilmer there’s a thomas mcgrath, a muriel rukeyser, a hugh macdiarmid. some people argue that there is much badly written political poetry — that much of it reads like a political pamphlet chopped into line breaks, or sing-song rhyming doggerel — and that this proves that political subject matter is not suited to poetry. but there is also much badly written love poetry, badly written poetry about religion, nature, and every other subject. do we then conclude that love, religion, nature, etc., are also unsuitable subjects for poetry? do hallmark greeting cards invalidate the work of dante and shakespeare and shelley and wordsworth? journalism reports facts; poetry tells the truth. in our time much political discourse in english — including discourse on the political left — is weighted with high-sounding rhetoric, with the greco-roman vocabulary of philosophy, psychology, and the other social sciences. one of our tasks, when writing about political subject matter (or any other subjects) is to make decisions about the vocabulary we use. 135 there is nothing wrong with using, in a poem, words such as “capitalism,” “working class,” “imperialism,” “revolution,” etc. the challenge is to ground such language in the concrete physical texture and detail of the world we live in from day to day, to reclaim it from the bourgeois abuse and alienation it has suffered, to give it the life and meaning it can actually have. we are not talking about merely taking a political speech or pamphlet, or a set of theoretical statements, and simplistically grafting them onto the skeleton of a poem — as if writing a poem were an act of taxidermy. it’s difficult to write a love poem if you’ve never been in love, or to write a poem about nature if you’ve never touched a tree. similarly, it can be difficult to write a good political poem if you’ve never marched in an anti-war demonstration, or faced a platoon of police in riot gear preparing to charge, or tried to pay rent or medicals when you’ve been unemployed for six months. the best examples of good left-wing political poetry are written out of an organic understanding of the politics, and out of a passionate involvement in the political movements of the time and place in which the poet lives. poetry of the political left from the twentieth century has developed along several currents or tendencies. my intention here is not to define rigid categories but to give examples of some of the possibilities poets have explored. though one or two of the poets i’ve named below might not strictly be considered politically left, all have at least shown a general outlook in their work that is populist, workingclass, anti-fascist, radically democratic, or of a similar character. 1. poetry rich in metaphor and imagery, poetry that works mainly be evoking feeling and sensory experience (rather than by elaborating intellectual argument or rhetorical appeal). example poets might be pablo neruda (usually), paul éluard, lorca, yosano akiko, mahmoud darwish, dale jacobson, rené depestre. sometimes verging on surrealism, as with éluard and lorca and depestre. 2. poetry that is agitational in tone, spare in imagery and metaphor, working by the kinetic energy of public speech. examples are bertolt brecht, mayakovsky, sol funaroff, langston hughes, césar vallejo in spain, take this cup from me. 3. poetry similar to the second type above but with a quieter voice, more personal, direct face-to-face speech rather than public oratory. examples are nazim hikmet, otto rené castillo, roque dalton, claribel alegría, maria aliger, anna swir, joy harjo sometimes, carl sandburg, luis j. rodríguez often, faiz ahmed faiz. 4. poetry that derives from or consciously imitates folk song. examples include brecht (sometimes), thomas mcgrath (sometimes), josé martí, hugh macdiarmid occasionally, langston hughes, naomi replansky at times. 5. poetry that is essentially traditional or classical lyric in tone (whether or not employing the external forms — sonnets, quatrains, etc.). examples are thomas political poetry 136 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research mcgrath (most characteristically), louis aragon, miguel hernández, rafael alberti, mao tse-tung [or mao zedong], william blake (in the shorter lyric poems), rubén darío, yannis ritsos, nancy morejón, don gordon, olga cabral, nelly sachs. 6. poetry that communicates by its rhetorical strength, poetry of ecstatic utterance. similar to type 2 above but with more elevated language. examples are william blake (in the “prophetic” poems), léopold senghor, walt whitman, kenneth fearing, yannis ritsos in some of his longer poems, anuradha mahapatra, joy harjo sometimes, dennis brutus, janice mirikitani, muriel rukeyser. 7. poetry that communicates mainly by intellectual argument or statement. examples are w. h. auden, edwin rolfe, jack beeching. 8. poetry that is documentary or journalistic in tone and method. examples are agostinho neto, javier heraud, leonel rugama, zöe anglesey (often), yannis ritsos (sometimes), anna swir (sometimes), nazim hikmet especially in his booklength poem human landscapes from my country. 9. poetry that works by humor or satire, or by an overall humorous or satirical tone. examples include kenneth patchen (often), thomas mcgrath now and then, kenneth fearing from time to time, mayakovsky often. obviously none of the poets named above wrote purely in the manners or styles outlined here. all have written poetry that fluidly combines the various approaches described above, and are certainly not limited to the possibilities given here. the above list is, again, intended to suggest some of the existing possibilities, not to limit or define rigidly. let us state here for the record that political correctness, understood properly, is a good thing. the expression “politically correct” originally meant “politically (and/or ethically/morally) the right thing to do.” it became a little confusing, sometimes, to talk about what was “politically right” because it sounded a little bit like “the political right” (who are, of course, politically wrong). so people got into the habit of saying “politically correct” instead, which sounded a little pompous sometimes but tended to be less confusing. to write poetry with political content that is left-wing, working-class, populist, or of a similar nature, is the right thing to do. the examples above make it clear that it is thoroughly possible to write poetry that has progressive political content and that is well-written. the fact is that leftwing political poetry, taken as a whole, is better poetry than poetry in which the poet has tried to leave politics out of it, or in which the poet has deliberately written from a right-wing perspective (i suppose a few examples of the latter do exist). we should have no hesitation about saying this — not, obviously, as absolute decrees from olympus, but as acts of affirmative belief: carl sandburg wrote better poetry than ezra pound. muriel rukeyser wrote better poetry than t. s. eliot. thomas mcgrath wrote better poetry than robert lowell. langston hughes 137 wrote better poetry than wallace stevens. gwendolyn brooks wrote better poetry than marianne moore. mayakovsky wrote better poetry than akhmatova or mandelstam. brecht wrote better poetry than rilke. otto rené castillo and leonel rugama wrote better poetry than octavio paz. etheridge knight wrote better poetry than john berryman. sharon doubiago and joy harjo and dale jacobson and luis rodríguez and nellie wong write better poetry than jorie graham or marvin bell or c. k. williams or billy collins or sharon olds. we don’t need the ruling class (or its representatives in arts and letters) to tell us whether or not we’re good poets. the record of our poetry, and the history from which it arises, speaks for itself. we reject “literary” standards that preclude politics as acceptable or essential subject matter. we belong in the real world of the living — breathing, changing, revolutionary — and the real world (and the poetry that grows from it) is the only answer we need to give. political poetry 138 alternate routes: a journal of critical social research whole book pdf global village chic: multicultural fashion" and the commodification of pluralism nicole bennett "i wanted to point out the tribal roots of body art and offer a little history lesson. "-fashion designer jean paul gaultier (cited in vogue, 1994:321) "blending primitive accessories, eighteenth-century shapes and stocking-sheer layers printed with ancient motifs, gaultier presents a startling vision of cross cultural harmony." {vogue, 1994:321) 1. introduction in his 1994 "global village chic" collection, jean paul gaultier, a french designer known for his eccentricities, and often labelled one of the 'bad boys' of paris fashion, brings together an eclectic combination of clothes meant to celebrate ethnic plurality. 1 the outfits which make up the global village chic collection, combine various prints, cuts, fabrics, and accessories which borrow heavily from a variety of different cultural styles in order to produce a "multicultural effect. " gaultier's global village chic is arguably the quintessential example of a recent trend within the fashion industry which expresses a concern for cultural pluralism. this interest in pluralism is characteristic of the contemporary revival of exoticism within designer fashion in which elements associated with 'nonwestern' 2 cultural styles are incorporated into 'western' haute alternate routes, volume 14, 1997 © ^) couture lines. this renewed influence of 'ethnic' styles in the high fashion industry seemed to have reached its peak as gaultier's global village chic hit the runways. the trend is evident in the large number of fashion magazine articles and tv fashion spots which note the turn to ethnicity, exoticism, cultural blending, and multiculturalism in fashion in the 1990s. as flare proclaims: at the moment, it seems, nothing is more fashionable than being a woman of culture. . .designers are sewing up a cultural mosaic, with threads of roman, greek, african, asian and indian influence. the result is a multiethnic celebration of dress... (flare, 1994c:70). dubbed "ethnic," "exotic," or "multicultural" fashion, this most recent appeal to non-western styles was presented as one of the main trends of the 1994 season (flare, 1994b:74). in this paper, i explore some of the meanings and messages associated with multicultural fashion as it is exemplified by gaultier's work. 3 1 am particularly interested in the way in which gaultier and other designers— including giorgio, donna karan, rifatozbek, christian lacroix, emanuel ungaro, romeo gigli and oscar de la renta—present themselves and are presented by others as commentators on racial and ethnic pluralism. i explore the ways in which their perspectives on pluralism resonate with discourses on race and ethnicity which take place in other fields. gaultier's work, and the larger trend of which it is a part, is of interest to me because of the way in which it incorporates, and responds to, current discourses on racial and ethnic tolerance. global village chic, as part of a larger fashion trend in which ethnicity becomes a central element of fashion collections, provides us with a glimpse of the possibilities both opened up and foreclosed when ethno-cultural difference becomes commodified; when notions of racial and ethnic difference, tolerance, and blending are presented in commodity form. in examining the way that the fashion industry describes its most recent turn to non-western influences, i begin with an understanding of fashion systems as culturally embedded; as both reflecting upon and contributing to contemporary cultural politics. like other cultural products, fashion systems can be seen as responses to, or representations of, contemporary cultural politics, and also as component parts of those politics. while it can be argued that multicultural fashion is primarily a response to broader debates concerning ethno-cultural difference and plurality, it also makes some contribution to those debates. we should remain open to the possibility that, in presenting fashion which resonates with particular strands of the ongoing debates and dialogues concerning how we should understand and manage plurality and difference in contemporary western nation-states, multicultural fashion makes modest interventions into those debates. having said this, i should stress that i do not want to over emphasize the influence of high fashion in shaping our understandings of racial and ethnic difference. clearly, the influence of ethnic fashion is limited by its structural location within the larger systems of meaning-making which serve to £$% produce and reproduce our cultural understandings of ethnic and cultural differences. my interest in ethnic fashion is primarily as a case in which we can begin to examine the limitations of racial and ethnic pluralism as commodity forms. one point which this paper makes, through its examination of how cultural pluralism is expressed in fashion, is that the location of different contributions or interventions may also set boundaries on how difference is conceptualized within them. pluralism expressed in the fashion industry in commodity form is, i suggest, inherently limited such that it is unable to move beyond particular ways of understanding of ethno-cultural difference. though designers may genuinely be seeking to promote cultural understanding throughout their collections, ultimately their work cannot help but incorporate ethnicity in stereotypical ways reproducing exaggerated, reified, and over simplified notions of ethnic distinctions. i suggest that ethnicity, once commodified, is unable to engage with the more radical strands of multiculturalism, as to do so would require understandings of difference which are simply incompatible with the needs of the commodity market. 2. ethnic fashion in the 1990s: eastern influences and cultural pluralism two distinct and somewhat contradictory trends are discernible within the turn to ethnic fashion in the 1990s. the first trend is characterised by a focus upon 'the east' 4 as a source of inspiration, as asian (and occasionally middle eastern) cultural forms are incorporated into western fashion collections. here, the turn to ethnicity is one in which designers have appropriated elements from styles associated with particular asian or middle eastern cultures (for example indian saris, or japanese cuts and prints) and used these in constructing collections which interpret and transform these supposedly 'exotic' costumes into western fashion collections. as toronto live fashion, states: you can ^^ tell that "the west's top designers have got the global spirit... by the eastern influences in so many of their collections" (1994:42emphasis in original). the cover story of flare's january 1994 issue, entitled "what's hot and what's not in 1994," also attests to the turn to "eastern influences" in contemporary collections. amongst those things listed as "hot" in canadian fashion for 1994 are, "a passage to india" (referring to styles which get inspiration from the sari), "fine china" (referring to collections which incorporate both the silhouettes and fabric patterns inspired by 'traditional' chinese designs) and "asian beauty" {flare, 1994a:52). while overall a fairly wide variety of eastern cultural products are drawn upon, the normal pattern here is one in which a single cultural source of inspiration for each line. the second trend associated with ethnic fashion in the 1990s foregrounds cultural plurality and is represented by the mixing or blending of different ethno-cultural elements. jean paul gaultier's and rifat ozbek's collections may be the clearest examples of this trend in which designers bring a number of different cultural influences together. sometimes referred to as "multicultural fashion," these collections are described by the designers themselves and by those who comment on their work as both reflecting and commenting on contemporary ethno/racial politics. multicultural fashion can be distinguished both from earlier appeals to non-western fashion and from the work of other contemporary designers who use a 'touch of ethnic' in their lines or who focus on a single non-western influence, by the way it brings many disparate elements together as a type of global fashion pastiche. the "multicultural effect" of each of the global village chic outfits is produced by combining elements which evoke cultures from disparate historical periods and geographical regions. in one example pictured in vogue, the caption reads: "around the world in one outfit" (vogue, march 1994). the photo itself shows fih a model donning a skin tight "tattoo" tube dress which is made of a combination of translucent elastic and opaque fabrics with a complicated print which reproduces parts of the patterns found on a number of eastern european paper currencies, including both border and background designs and also denomination numbers. her left wrist and forearm are tattooed with a swirly geometric pattern reminiscent of the more complicated henna patterns worn on the hands and feet of brides and young women in a number of regions of india (vogue, 1994:332). the themes of this outfit are repeated in altered forms in the other photographs which represent gaultier's collection. the models sport a variety of clothes ranging from a bustier and leggings to a scarf-like sarong skirt matched with a see-through, skin tight, one armed, cropped top. each is heavily jewelled with a combination of necklaces, ear, nose, and finger rings, wrist and ankle bracelets and headgear, all apparently influenced by non-western traditions. body tattooing in swirling abstract patterns, stick on jewels (reminiscent of the more fancy dress'b indies' worn by indian women, but placed in rows either along the bone of the nose or at the upper outside edges of the eyebrows) and a broad vertical shimmering grey line pained in the centre of the brow complicate the outfits and add a further layer of exoticism (vogue, 1994:334-338). within each outfit of the global village collection, gaultier's combining of elements, drawn from a variety of different cultural "inspirations," effectively foregrounds both pluralism and exoticism. together the use of eastern influences and the emergence of multiculturalfashion exemplified by the global village chic collection, form the dominant trends which characterise the appeal to exoticism in contemporary western high fashion systems. we should not, of course, be surprised that high fashion designers have recently rediscovered exoticism. in the fashion industry context, exoticism is one of a large number of variables &% which are drawn upon by designers in an industry which is continually searching for ways to move beyond, build upon, or otherwise transform last year's look into something new. as elizabeth fox-genovese (1987:11) has noted, the "first criteria" of the fashion industry is "newness or nowness." fashion, she rightly points out "derives an important part of its everyday existence . . . from change" (1987:11). in order to create designs which are reflective of the "nowness" of a particular period, which stand for, reflect, and in part define different historical moments, designers draw upon and combine in different ways all sorts of themes of which 'ethnicity' is one: ...designers are constantly searching for new ideas, themes and motifs from historical dress, non-european dress, popular culture and subcultures. like birds of prey, they rob the nests of other fashion systems in a process of appropriation and cannibalization. these stylistic motifs are then reconstructed in a process of bricolage, the creation of new patterns and modes from the kaleidoscopic pits and pieces of cultural debris. (craik, 1994:ix-x) though the passage above may be read as suggesting that the process of selection and appropriation of 'non-western' fashion elements is more or less arbitrary, this is not altogether the case. as both the designers themselves and fashion industry commentators note, the use of different 'ethnic' elements should be seen in terms of industry responses and interventions into contemporary cultural politics. 3. meanings and messages: how difference is/can be understood in multicultural fashion what messages are designers such as gaultier making with their multicultural fashion collections? what do they and the fashion commentators who interpret their collections say about ethnicity and racial and ethnic tolerance in their explanations of the various ethnic and multicultural fashion collections? (a) celebrating pluralism with the global village chic collection, gaultier is implicitly responding and contributing to current debates on cultural pluralism, and cultural border-crossing. in global village chic, he presents a 'celebration' of pluralism by combining elements associated with different ethno-cultural groups, and making them speak to each other in the various outfits that make up the collection. the repetition of styles and colours in the various elements of each outfit allow the viewer to see each as an outfit rather than as an assembly of clashing or incompatible parts. as a metaphor for the peoples whose cultural products were the inspiration for the various elements of each outfit, gaultier's global village chic presents a clear statement about the ability for different ethno-cultural groups to come together © in harmony without losing their specificity. as vogue (1994:333) states, in reference to the global village chic line, "gaultier presents a starling vision of cross-cultural harmony." through the global village collection, gaultier responds (and contributes) to debates about the heterogeneity of contemporary societies in a way which celebrates cultural plurality and cross cultural experiences. rather than responding by appealing to rhetorics of ethnic purity, separation, or assimilation, gaultier presents consumers with a series of outfits that bring a number of different cultural products together in a celebration of diversity. this celebration of diversity can also be witnessed in the work of rifat ozbek who, along with gaultier, is described as being representative of the "multicultural slant" found in nineties fashions (vogue, 1993:471). ozbek's "culture club" collection which incorporates indonesian prints, cavalry cut jackets, and nepalese inspired hats trimmed with mongolian fir, is described ^^ in vogue as a style which is "truly a global cocktail:" like a posse of vagabonds, [ozbek's] eclectic group of girls decked out in wild mixes of mongolian-furtrimmed nepalese hats and nylon taffeta trenches lend new meaning to the term global village (vogue, 1993:471). the models who pose in ozbek's collection in vogue embrace each other as they walk together in a line down a park lane. in ozbek's image of the "global village" it is not conflict but rather harmony that results from crossing the borders that exist in diversity. (b) on the nature of ethnicity: geographical and temporal distinctions what of the nature of ethnicity as it is presented in the fashions of gaultier, ozbek and others? in examining the descriptions of ethnic fashion in the 1990s, it is clear that the celebration of diversity expressed in the recent turn to ethnicity in fashion is one which is consistent with understandings of ethno-cultural difference in which the term ethnic is associated with non-western and 'pre-modern' influences. ethnicity is defined in terms of both geographical and temporal distinctions. (i) ethnicity as non-western it is quickly evident from the descriptions of ethnic and multicultural fashion that ethnic refers to fashion which draws upon any l non-western' cultural product. 5 ostensibly a geographical categorisation, in fact, the term ethnic is used as a banner under which fashion elements associated with any and all of the west's cultural "others" are grouped. ethnic fashion refers to fashion whose designs (either in terms of cut, silhouette, type of apparel, accessories, prints, or details) are influenced by any cultural product not associated with the western cultural norm. incorporating any 'non-western' influence seems to be sufficient for a collection to be grouped under the ethnic fashion ^^ banner. thus we see christian lacroix's gilt embroidered silk %& kimono house dresses, franco mirabelle's crumpled linen nehru suits, and the eclectic mixing of gaultier, all described as part of the recent re-emergence of ethnic fashion. while the ethnic fashion collections introduced in the 1990s contain messages about celebrating cultural diversity, they also make clear distinctions between that which is ethnic and that which is non-ethnic fashion. while claiming to celebrate cultural and racial tolerance and border crossing, the collections also serve to maintain long held beliefs about the normality or universality of euro-american cultural products by setting off all other cultural products as 'ethnic,' and/or exotic. this positioning of some cultures as the norm and some as different is a common element in many of the liberal appeals to cultural, racial, and ethnic pluralism. though the liberal approach seems to strive towards laudable goals such as recognition and celebration of diversity, it has been criticised by more radical theorists for its failure to significantly challenge status quo conceptions of race and ethnicity. the liberal approach is criticised firstly for limiting the social contribution of 'ethnic' communities to that of being providers of cultural spice; livening up, but not fundamentally altering western cultural norms. secondly, it is stressed that the liberal celebration of diversity serves ultimately to reproduce the privileged space of the (supposedly non-ethnic) norm and to maintain existing power hierarchies related to racial and ethnic differences. as homi bhabha (1990:208) states in his critique of liberal notions associated with the celebration of diversity, "it is commonplace of plural, democratic societies to say that they can encourage and accommodate cultural diversity;" that, in fact, "the sign of the cultured civilised attitude is the ability to appreciate cultures in a kind of musee imaginaire; as though one should be able to collect and appreciate them." however, while this approach encourages or celebrates plurality on one level, bhabha also notes that there is ff!% an element of containment ever present with such appeals to cultural diversity, for there remains a transparent (often unarticulated) norm "given by the host society or dominant culture, which says 'these other cultures are fine, but we must be able to locate them within our own grid"' (1990:208). radical multicultural ists such as bhabha suggest that it is not only the refusal to recognise difference which creates and maintains hierarchical dualities. as bhabha points out, the liberal appeal to cultural pluralism also serves to contain difference and reproduce associated hierarchies through the continued reference to an imagined cultural norm (or grid as he puts it) as it celebrates cultural diversity. as he states "the universal ism [of liberal multicultural societiesl that paradoxically permits diversity masks ethnocentric norms, values and interests" (bhabha, 1990:208). bhabha's critique of the "liberal relativist perspective" echoes critiques of early multiculturalism in canada, which claimed that the celebration of diversity reflected in federal multicultural policies and programs was one which forever relegated many groups to the position of second class "multicultural" citizens whose role was to add cultural spice to the apparently otherwise bland canadian cultural landscape. the celebration of diversity promoted by multiculturalism, it was argued, while acknowledging plurality on one level, ultimately reproduced existing ethno-cultural hierarchies. 6 both the global village chic collection and the overall turn to ethnic fashion of which it is a part are grounded in the same liberal understandings of ethnic and racial difference described and criticised above. the turn to ethnic fashion remains very much within a "celebration of diversity" approach to racial and ethnic tolerance as it is described by bhabha. though they appear to acknowledge and promote pluralism, they do so in ways which reproduce ethnocentric norms by positioning those that differ from the norm as ethnic others. the appeal to ethno-cultural diversity found in the fashion industry's turn to ethnicity is similar in this respect to the ways ^h in which other industries have commodified ethnicity in the contemporary period. world beat music provides another example of commodified ethnicity whose emergence and popularity roughly coincide with the contemporary return to ethnic fashion. as goodwin and gore (1990:65) note, while the term world beat was originally "adopted by a loose aggregation of san francisco musicians...who wanted a convenient label for their fusion of rock, funk, african and afro caribbean musics," its current meaning is significantly broader in scope. more recently, they note, "the term world beat has become a fashionable label for the musical traditions of regions other than north america and europe" (goodwin and gore, 1990:65) 7 . in this respect, the term world beat incorporates and highlights "ethnicity" using a similar categorisation of norm and other as that reproduced by ethnic fashion. 8 as with ethnic fashion, the defining characteristic of world beat music is based upon an oversimplified distinction between western cultural products and non-western cultural products, a distinction that ultimately rests upon discourses of exoticism. el i i lester's work on the use of discourses of the exotic in fashion advertising presents a critical assessment of the way in which these discourses serve the purpose of a "global material culture" (1992:75). the ethnic fashion example which i am examining here, is similar to the case which lester examines in the way in which ethnicity and exoticism are set off from the norm defined in terms of western european and north american traditions, and in the way in which stereotypical images serve to objectify the ethnic other. lester relates the banana republic catalogue to other texts in which the "costumed 'native,' is abstracted from his or her setting, and re-created as a metaphor for exotic difference." through the strategies of (a) "the creation of the subject through the construction of a preferred reader," (with the exclusive use of white models) (b) the "uses of history and 'invented tradition' from the point of view £f% of the preferred reader" (not from the point of view of the 'natives' in other words), (c) "the jumbling of spatial and temporal images" using collage and montage, and (d) "the construction of authenticity," lester argues that the banana republic text accomplishes the "creation of the exotic other" (1992:77-79). while there are similarities between the banana republic catalogue's strategic use of images of exoticism and the way in which the exotic is presented in ethnic fashion, lester's analysis also brings to light a number of differences. for one thing, in ethnic fashion (in keeping with more recent trends in the fashion industry) the models who present the clothing are more often than not both white and women of colour. thus, while there is a distinction between western and non-western which reproduces notions of which cultures are considered 'ethnic' in contemporary societies, there is also a space provided for western women of colour to be interpellated by this fashion. as well, the appeal to ethnicity is very different given the fact that within ethnic fashion, ethnicity becomes an integral part of the product being sold, not simply a background image as in the banana republic catalogue. with ethnic fashion, consumers are encouraged to appropriate and play with ethnicity in much more intimate ways than anything being suggested by the banana republic catalogue which reproduces ethnicity at a distance from its preferred audience. the most striking difference, however, is that of the issue of cross-cultural blending. within the contemporary turn to ethnic fashion in general, and especially within multicultural fashion as exemplified by the work of gaultier and ozbek, we can see appeals to cultural blending which resonate with contemporary calls for racial tolerance, and multiculturalism. i should stress, however, that despite these appeals to ethnocultural plurality, the commodification of ethno-cultural difference in contemporary ethnic fashion allows little room for representations which address the complexities and tensions surrounding ethno-cultural difference as it is actually lived by individuals and groups in contemporary societies. this sometimes results in rather odd representations of different ethno-cultural dcjcfc groups. again, gaultier's work provides an interesting example. in an earlier collection which combines elements inspired by street punk styles and the outfits worn by hasidic jewish men, models are dressed in outfits reminiscent of the long black coats worn by hasidic men, with their hair made up to resemble the men's "payees" and donning imitation sabbath "platter" hats. gaultier, reflecting on his collection states that "fashion always reflects society and what's going on in the world... right now you can't ignore the mix of cultures and religions; you have to respond" (vogue, 1993:471). he also describes the collection as a "homage to the jewish religion" (vogue, 1993:484). his choice of a hasidic jew-street punk fusion as his response to cultural and religious mixing and as "homage" to judaism is rather perplexing. hasidic communities are well known for their self-segregating practices. as communities, they support neither the mixing of cultures, nor the mixing of religions. attempts to establish institutional completeness, with separate schools, stores, and community centres attest to the hasidic communities' desire to remain distinct from other groups with whom they often share neighbourhoods. they are also generally hostile to the "immodesty" of contemporary fashion maintaining rather strict gendered dress codes. (in recent years publicity has been garnered by hasidic jews in jerusalem who have torched bus shelters with posters of "immodestly" dressed women.) it is unlikely given this, that the hasidic communities would respond favourably to gaultier's punk/hasidic collection. they would, i think, neither see it as an appropriate homage to their faith nor would they likely endorse its message of cultural blending. rather than paying homage to their faith, gaultier's collection ends up making light of it in order to present a new flavour of exoticism for western fashion consumers. ultimately, gaultier's lofty punk-hasid collection can in no way communicate the importance and meaning that hasidic communities associate with their dress (nor for that matter does ^^ it likely communicate the importance and meaning of dress for street punks). the consumers of gaultier's hasid-punk outfits will likely have no greater understanding after their purchase of either the hasid or punk sub-cultures and how their experiences and perspectives might differ from (and perhaps challenge) their own. instead of promoting greater understanding, gaultier's hasid-punk collection simply slaps two very different images together in a series of outfits which reduce culture to exotic flare. (ii) ethnicity as a temporal distinction besides the western/non-western dichotomy, there is a second defining characteristic of ethnicity as expressed in ethnic fashion. ethnicity is presented within global fashion as pre-rnodern or at the very least aspre-present. while vogue credits gaultier with having created wardrobe for a "futuristic globe-trotting tribe," this is achieved by "blending primitive accessories, eighteenthcentury shapes, and stocking sheer layers printed with ancient motifs" (vogue, 1994:333-my emphasis). that which is ethnic is clearly represented here and elsewhere as being located frozen in some moment prior to the present. this, despite the fact that the ethnic groups whose cultural products are being 'borrowed" exist very much in the present; despite the fact that the currencies which make up the "ancient motifs" on gaultier's tube dresses were still being used in people's every day transactions even as gaultier's models were posing with their designs hugging their bodies. in representing non-western cultures as things of the past, western linear notions of the 'evolution' of cultures are reproduced and/or reinforced. this representation of non-western cultures as existing in some pre-present moment resonates with what james clifford has called the "salvage paradigm" in anthropology in which "most non-western peoples are [perceived as] marginal to the advancing world system" (1987:122). the role of anthropology in the salvage paradigm, as clifford describes it, is to salvage or collect the authentic identities and artefacts of £% these 'untouched' non-western groups before they are assimilated into the "modern world: " authenticity in culture or art exists just prior to the present—but not so distant or eroded as to make collection or salvage impossible. marginal, non-western groups constantly (as the saying goes) enter the modern world. and whether this entry is celebrated or lamented, the price is always this: local, distinctive paths through modernity vanish. these historicities are swept up in a destiny dominated by the capitalist west and by various technologically advanced socialisms. what's different about peoples seen to be moving out of 'tradition' into 'the modern world' remains tied to inherited structures that either resist or yield to the new but cannotproduce it (1987: 122—emphasis in original). clifford's discussion is applicable to the ethnic fashion example which tends to highlight ethnic elements as artefacts from the past, and which relies primarily on the designer to take these 'historical' elements and transform them for present (or future) consumers in the west. 9 as one article notes, "even ralph lauren, the king of aristocratic style" has embraced ethnic fashion with a collection of outfits that "conjure up images of nomadic immigrants adapting their own customs to a new world" (vogue 1993:471) 10 . in representing non-western cultures as existing in the past, and in reducing their cultural products to signifiers of exoticism, western designers are in fact dehistoricising and decontexualizing the communities whose products have inspired the various elements of different ethnic fashion collections. this being the case, it is particularly odd that gaultier would claim as quoted above, that with the global village chic collection, he wanted "to offer a little history lesson." global village chic dsl cannot provide us with a history lesson. rather, what it presents us with is merely a collage of easily recognised symbols of exoticism. while non-western cultures are presented as things of the past, their products are nonetheless fused by designers into "the latest fashion trend. " in this way ethnic fashion is presented as a celebration both of the blending of culture and also of the blending of times. (hi) ethnicity as exoticism ethnic fashion which appeals to the idea that ethnic cultural products "come from" a specific (foreign/ancient) cultural context are presented to potential consumers primarily through the discourses of exoticism. in describing the elements of ethnic fashion collections, commentators highlight the idea that these products have 'come from' some cultural context other than the western norm. however, few of the descriptions of ethnic fashion mention the various cultures and groups whose cultural products have been used by designers to create their collections; often the influences remain completely unnamed. when descriptions do name influences, the references are often quite broad. vogue, for example, notes that gaultier's face jewellery borrows from "the far east" but leaves it at that. while we are told that the patterns of the tube dress "duplicate. . .snippets of eastern european currency" {vogue, 1994:333), we are not told which currencies. despite the fact that the detailed henna painting from which gaultier draws inspiration is a regionally specific cultural product, with different communities producing distinct patterns and using the paintings for different occasions, these specificities are lost as the body painting is appropriated and transformed by gaultier for his collection. in uprooting cultural products, gaultier and others are unable to communicate to the consumer anything of the specific cultural purpose or meaning previously attached to them as they are transformed into markers of exoticism. the reduction of the elements of ethnic fashion to markers of exoticism, enables consumers to engage with ethnic plural^ft ism in commodified forms without taking on any of the more difficult issues of power, hierarchy, privilege and oppression related to ethno-cultural difference as it is experienced both here in canada and elsewhere. it is only through this process of simplification that ethnicity can appear as something that can be bought and sold. in this respect, the contemporary turn to ethnic and multicultural fashion is consistent with the fashion industry's earlier appeals to exoticism. as craik points out in reference to yves saint laurent's peasant dress collection of 1976, the collection "enabled the rich to 'play act' at being peasants" at the same time as it appealed to "ordinary women" who "felt an affinity with the humble origins of . . .the new style. " the recent turn to exoticism, like saint laurent's peasant collection, allows individuals who can afford it, to take on, and to play with the ethnicity of the other at a superficial level without their having to engage with the true complexities of ethnicity as it is experienced by individuals in the cultures whose products they have ^) appropriated in altered forms. this is fashion which presents ethnicity as something that one can take up and then alter as easily as we change our clothes: a russian gypsy swathed in a paisley chiffon scarfskirt today could very well turn up as a sexy italian bombshell in a transparent black evening dress tomorrow. call it a new democracy of style. (vogue, 1993:471) as bell hooks rightly notes, there is nothing in this type of appropriation and play with ethnicity which will necessarily lead to greater respect for ethno-cultural differences. the pleasure which commodified ethnicity brings, she argues, does not challenge people to re-examine their own positionalities within hierarchies of power. it does not even require that we acknowldege that such hierarchies exist. hooks' discussion of the commodification of otherness both highlights the recent fascination with other cultures and their products, and shows how this trend does little to challenge the existing order: within current debates about race and difference, mass culture is the contemporary location that both publicly declares and perpetuates the idea that there is pleasure to be found in the acknowledgement and enjoyment of racial difference. the commodification of otherness has been so successful because it is offered as a new delight, more intense, more satisfying than normal ways of doing and feeling. within commodity culture, ethnicity becomes a spice, seasoning that can liven up the dull dish that is mainstream white culture, (hooks, 1992:21) hooks argues that within contemporary north american and british popular culture, otherness is exploited by mainstream social forces, and that this exploitation serves to maintain the inequalities and structural relations which are associated with ethno-cultural difference. as she states, from the standpoint of white supremacist capitalist patriarchy, the hope is that desires for the "primitive" or fantasies about the other can be continually exploited, and that such exploitation will occur in a manner that reinscribes and maintains the status quo (1992:22-emphasis in original). the commodification of otherness which hooks describes is engaged in similar processes of othering as that represented by global village chic and other fashion lines incorporating "ethnic flavour" into western fashion. hooks stresses that the commodification of otherness which perpetuates the idea that "there is pleasure to be found in the acknowledgement and enjoyment of racial difference," in no way challenges the existing social hierarchies: to make one's self vulnerable to the seduction of difference, to seek an encounter with the other, does not require that one relinquish forever one's mainstream positionality. when race and ethnicity become commodified as resources for pleasure, the culture of specific groups, as well as the bodies of individuals, can be seen as constituting an alternative playground where members of dominating races, genders, sexual practices affirm their power-over in intimate relations with the other (1992:23). although ethnic fashion does not usually involve the sort of intimate relations between the dominating consumer and the ethnic other which hooks is describing in the passage above, her comments are nonetheless relevant. the affirmation of the belief that there is pleasure to be found in an encounter with the other, that there is pleasure in ethno-cultural diversity, is part of the message projected with multicultural fashion. like the commodification of otherness to which hooks refers, the celebration of ethno-cultural diversity found in global village chic, is, ultimately, incompatible with the more radical understandings © of contemporary ethno-cultural difference proposed by bhabha, hooks and other cultural theorists, who challenge us to take note not only of the existence of ethno-cultural differences, but to also critically explore how these differences are maintained and constructed and how they relate to the ways in which groups and individuals are symbolically and materially positioned within hierarchical societies. the appeal to exoticism found in ethnic fashion fails to involve the questioning of positionalities or privilege. whether the possibility exists of alternative constructions within the fashion industry which do allow for and perhaps even promote more critical re-evaluations of difference is doubtful, given the designers' needs to present clear, easily marketed images of exoticism for the consumer market. 4. conclusion in adorned in dreams, elizabeth wilson argues that fash£$% ion is "a cultural phenomenon... an aesthetic medium for expression of ideas, beliefs and desires circulating in society" (1985:9). as i have shown, ethnic fashion as an aesthetic medium expresses particular ideas, particular beliefs, and particular desires about ethno-cultural difference and ethno-cultural tolerance. while there is clearly room within the descriptions of designers and fashion commentators for some differences in interpretation, it seems clear that some strands of the ongoing debates and dialogues on ethno-cultural difference will likely remain beyond the scope of commodified ethnicity such as exists in ethnic fashion. while fashion designers such as gaultier can claim to be encouraging racial and ethnic understanding, their type of work, drawing as it does upon discourses of the exotic, does not lead to greater cross-cultural understanding. rather, their collections simply reproduce in different forms stereotypical images which serve to further objectify groups and individuals positioned as 'ethnic' notes. 1. i would like to thank jacob bakan, alan hunt and two anonymous reviewers for critical comments on earlier drafts of this paper. 2. the author seeking to explore how stereotypical categories are evoked and used quickly encounters a difficulty: on the one hand there is a desire to challenge the existence of such categories, on the other hand it is difficult to describe and explore their use without adopting and thereby reproducing them. though this appears to be a rather straight forward problem, it is one with which i continue to struggle. here i have tried to follow what i think are two useful academic norms developed to deal with this issue—when introducing a term which i feel is problematic, i have highlighted this with the use of scare quotes. as well, i have tried where convenient to point out to the reader how/why i think the term is problematic. 3. this paper is part of a larger, ongoing project which seeks to explore and analyze how multicultural and pluralistic ideals are taken up in a variety of social settings by individuals and groups. 4. the classification of fashion as ethnic and/or exotic relies heavily upon a whole series of questionable assumptions about what are 'normal' western cultural forms and what are not. references to the east and eastern influences which are common in representations of ethnic fashion in the 1990s serve to reify and artificially divide cultural forms into an oversimplified western/eastern dichotomy. in categorizing fashion in this way, individuals in the fashion industry treat cultures and cultural products as static, distinct classifications. in so doing they necessarily ignore hundreds of years of cultural influence and exchange. the ongoing movement of peoples and cross fertilization of cultural forms is such that to speak in terms of western and eastern fashion elements is necessarily somewhat of an oversimplification. 5. once again, i should stress that these are highly problematic terms. as it is used, non-western cultural products can be understood here to refer to products associated with cultures which lie outside of the euro-american industrial, capitalist imagined norm. as such they include cultural products associated with the majority of the world's population including people from asia, africa, the middle east, and south america. also included in this classification of non-western are products from the west's internal others such as the aboriginal communities which have long inhabited regions such as north america and australia and the western communities who have immigrated from or whose ancestors came from o © non-european regions. 6. for examples of this line of critique in the canadian multicultural context, see the work of lupul (1982, 1983, 1989), bullivant (1981), and peter (1981). 7. as goodwin and gore note (1990:65), this has resulted in the recategorization as world beat of music such as la mystcre de voix bulgares (a bulgarian women's choir), whose "largely traditional music... which would once have been categorized under the older label of 'international music' was considered, in 1988, to be on the cutting edge of 'new' music." 8. there are, of course, a number of differences between how ethnocultural difference is dealt with by world beat and ethnic fashion. for example, with many traditional musical forms recategorised as world beat music, the world beat genre does not necessarily involve the same transformative processes through which non-western cultural products are packaged for western consumption as that which is characteristic of ethnic fashion. under the category of world beat we can find not only a wide variety of different musical fusions, and transformed styles but also nonwestern cultural products which are not significantly transformed before being marketed to western consumers. 9. for a discussion of the transformative processes through which 'authentic' ethnic costumes are appropriated and incorporated into western fashion collections see eric cohen's case study of the "boutiquisation" of textiles from the hill tribes of northern thailand (1988). 10. representations of non-western people's cultural products as 'ancient' are consistent with the belief that those cultures themselves come from the past. in the canadian context the combination of the geographical and temporal assumptions about ethnicity underlie the continued belief that rather than ever-changing dynamic human creations which are part of the present canadian experience, 'ethnic' cultures are something brought to canada (usually through the immigration process) with people from "the old country." references bhabha, homi k. 1990 "the third space: interview with homi bhabha" pp. 207-221 in identity, community, culture, difference jonathan rutherford (ed.) london: lawrence and wishart. bullivant, brian m. 1981 "multiculturalismpluralist orthodoxy or ethnic hegemony?" canadian ethnic studies. 13(2). clifford, james 1987 "of odier peoples: beyond the salvage paradigm" pp. 121-130 in discussions in contemporary culture. hal foster (ed.) seattle: bay press. craik, jennifer 1994 the face offashion: cultural studies in fashion. new york: routledge. cohen, eric 1988 "from tribal costume to pop fashion: the 'boutiquisation' of the textiles of the hill tribes of northern thailand." studies in popular culture. 11(2): 49-59. flare 1994a "what's hot and what's not for 1994. " january, 1994: 52. 1994b "spring '94 trends. " march, 1994: 59-76. 1994c "fashion advisor. " may, 1994: 70. fox-genovese 1987 "the empress's new clodies: the politics of fashion. " socialist review, 17(1)): 6-30. goodwin, andrew and gore, joe 1990 "world beat and the cultural imperialism debate. " socialist review. 20(3) 63-80. hooks, bell 1 992 " eating the other" pp. 2 1 -39 in black looks: race and representation. toronto: between the lines: lester, elli 1992 "buying the exotic other: reading die 'banana republic' mail order catalogue" journal ofcommunication inquiry. 16(2): pp. 74-85. lupul, manoly r. 1982 "the political implementation of multiculturalism." journal of canadian studies. 17: 93-102. 1983 "multiculturalism and canada's white edmics." canadian ethnic studies. 15: 99-107. 1989 "networking, discrimination and multiculturalism as a social philosophy. " canadian ethnic studies 21(2). © peter, karl 1981 "the myth of multiculturalism and other political fables" pp. 5667 in ethnicity, power and politics in canada. jorgen dahlie and tisa fernando (eds.) toronto: methuen. toronto life fasliion 1994 no title toronto life fashion. november, 1994: 42. wilson, elizabeth 1985 adorned in dreams: fashion and modernity. berkeley: university of california press. vogue 1 993 " independents' day. " september 1 993 : 47 1-487 . 1 994 "the independents: jean paul gaultier . " (fashion editor: grace coddington). march 1994, pp. 332-337. © 133 community colleges and the division between mental and manual labour david robinson poulantzas ' (1978) analysis of the contribution of the educational apparatus to the reproduction of the division between mental and manual labour is elaborated upon to provide a theoretical framework for examining community colleges in terms of their relationship to the capitalist labour process. the thesis is that community colleges legitimize political relations in the labour process by defining the knowledge of graduates as inferior to the knowledge of university-educated workers trained in comparable specialities . community college programs designed for engineering technicians are discussed in seme detail and a number of suggestions for future research are advanced. alternate routes vol. 5 1982 134 cet article utilise i 'analyse de poulantzas (1978) sur la contribution de i 'appareil educatif dans la reproduction ie la division entre travail manuel et travail intellectuel -our elaborer un cadre theorique permettant i ' examen de la relation entre les colleges communautaires et le proces du travail aapitaliste . l'auteur soutient que les colleges communautaires legitiment les relations politiques dans le proc"es de travail en accordant un statut infirieur au savoir de leurs gradues face aux universitaires formes dans des domaines comparables . ii analyse en detail les programmes des colleges communautaires des techniciens en genie et suggsere quelques avenues de recherche . few theoretical or empirical analyses of community college systems have been conducted by canadian sociologists of education. as pike's (1981) recent review of canadian literature on postsecondary education makes very clear, canadian sociologists have devoted far less attention to the area of higher education then they have to elementary and secondary education. the most obvious reason for the paucity of literature on community colleges is that their emergence has been a very recent development in the history of postsecondary education in canada. in fact, most community colleges first opened their doors to students in the early sixties. in spite of their late inception in canada, community colleges currently serve a surprising proportion of postsecondary students, although universities continue to maintain the largest share of graduates, in 1978, community colleges awarded 62,443 135 certificates and diplomas compared to 103,738 degrees awarded by universities (clark and zsigmond , 1981 : 62 , 66) . in the united states, where the genisis of community colleges can be traced to the turn of the century, some sociological work has been carried out. this literature emphasizes the extent to which community colleges have contributed to a stratification process in postsecondary education in the united states as well as the implications of this process for individual mobility (pincus , 1978 , 1980; karabel , 1977 ; mayes, 1977; bowles and gintis,1976; zwerling , 1976) . 1 in this paper, i will depart somewhat from this emphasis, to focus on the role of community colleges in the transmission of skills which are employable in the workplace. while the stratification process is not the immediate concern here, it is, however, an important one at a more general level. in raising the issue of community colleges and work skills, various perspectives which focus on the relationship between schools and the workplace will be examined. after identifying some of the shortcomings of this literature, an alternative position will be proposed, one which focuses on the ideological role of the educational system in the transmission of skills. the work of nicos poulantzas on the contribution of the educational apparatus to the reproduction of the division of mental and manual labour will be utilized since it is particularly helpful in understanding the relationship between community college education and the capitalist workplace. one of the most salient features of community college systems in canada is their emphasis on vocational training or alternate routes vol. 5 1982 136 educational programs which are designed to prepare individuals to assume particular positions in the work world (martin and macdonell , 1978 : 28) . unlike postsecondary education at the university level, which is typically more general, community college programs are often geared toward specific work destinations. as the designation "community college" conveys, many of these institutions are perceived as responding to particular labour market demands arising in the communities in which they are situated. a variety of career -or iented programs are offered to students: training in numerous engineering and medical technologies, nursing studies, clerical and business education, and various other vocational programs which evoke images of skilled positions in the realm of work. the term "community college" is normally associated with larger educational establishments offering a comprehensive range of postsecondary programs. in addition, a variety of more specialized institutions such as schools of technology, agriculture, and nursing, can be included under the broad category of "community college". in comparison to the type of credential conferred by the university, community colleges offer no degrees, although, in some provinces, studies may be continued at the university level. community college programs usually lead to certificates and diplomas, with courses varying 2 in length from one to three years of study." although the "training for skills" function is often explicitly claimed by community colleges, recent "conflict" interpretations of schooling call such an assertion into question (bowles and gintis,1976; shecter , 197" ; collins , 1979; 137 harp, 1980). for example, sociologists who have investigated the origins of public education in canada have advanced the view that the need for technical skills was never a major impetus in the development of canadian educational policy. nor, as its proponents implied, was universal public education designed to provide mobility for the masses. the schools were depended upon to constitute "a successful program of integration" which "would lead to a passivity on the part of people towards the inequality of society" (harp , 1980 : 222) . according to shecter (1977:379), the school system was fashioned to train workers who would be sufficiently disciplined to perform the function of labour in industrial capitalism. bleasdale (1978:14) writes: "the social organization of the school was, in its early form, an almost exact replica of factory organization." with specific regard to technical and vocational training in canada, after examining the historical record, shecter (1977:390-398) and harp (1980: 222-224) arrive at similar judgements. they conclude that the real goal behind such education reflected its social control potential rather than a desire to deliver technical skills. a number of theoretical stances concerning the school's ability to supply technical skills can be isolated. the perspective which views the education system as primarily engaged in training students to fulfil the technical requirements of work has been identified as "technological functionalism" in the sociological literature on education. adherents of this position, perhaps best represented by burton clarke (1962), argue that the skills marketed by the school are tailored to alternate routes vol. 5 1982 138 the exigencies of a technologically complex and advanced societies. in contrast thecentral argument running through the neo-marxist stance put forward by bowles and gintis (1976) is that the chief role of the school is to turn out students whose non-cognitive personality traits and attitudes are conducive to acquiescence in a capitalist work world. in this view of the manner in which educational activities are related to the workplace, the ostensible function of the school in the delivery of cognitive or* technical skills camouflages its role in producing students who will adapt easily to the social relations of production. in this way, the education system aids in the smooth reproduction of capitalist society. randall collins amplifies on bowles and gintis' position that the school's forte is not in the realm of technical training. writing in a neo-weberian conflict vein, collins portrays the school as an agency for producing and distributing status cultures, suggesting that status groups manipulate educational policy in order to regulate entrance into their particular ranks. the myriad types of knowledge which the school produces are understood as contributions to the identity and exclusiveness of status groups rather than to the need for skilled workers. while collins shares bowles and gintis' indictment of technological functionalist theories, his analysis does not proceed from a critique of capitalist society. bowles and gintis have influenced conceptions of the relationship between schools and work more than any other recent writers in the sociology of education. for this reason, the 139 tenets of their thesis and the criticisms which have been leveled against them will be explored further. in their celebrated schooling in capitalist america , bowles and gintis (1976:47) assert that, in the past, theorists have incorrectly perceived work in capitalist society as essentially a technical process requiring an education system which prepares individuals for mastery of technical skills. alternatively, they point to work under capitalism as being principally a social process demanding schools which equip students with the social dispositions necessary for the success of the capitalist system of production. bowles and gintis provide examples of how the evolution of the education system in the united states has been shaped by interests which have primarily reflected capital's need for control over the labour process, rather than for the technical expertise of workers (1976:73-81). in their formulation of what has been 4 labeled the "correspondence principle", they describe how the education system accomplishes its task: the educational system helps integrate youth into the economic system, we believe, through a structural correspondence between its social relations and those of production. the structure of social relations in education not only inures the student to the discipline of the work place, but develops the type of personal demeanor, or modes of self -presentation, self-image, and socialclass identifications which are the crucial ingredients of job adequacy (1976:131). beyond correspondence at the aggregate level, the social relations at varying levels in the education system correspond to the social relations at different layers in the hierarchical division of labour. kence, emphasis on rule following at lower levels of the education system (e.g., junior and senior high alternate routes vol. 5 1982 140 school) parallels the capitalist imperative of tight control over workers at lower levels in the workplace. at higher levels in the education system (e.g., university), the social relations are arranged to prepare students for roles in higher levels of the workplace where dependability and internalization ot the norms of tne enterprise are expected. in their application of the correspondence principle to the educational processes of community colleges, bowles and gintis draw attention to the heavy vocational orientation there compared to four-year universities. they suggest that community colleges have evolved in response to the needs generated by the expansion of corporate capital for new kinds of workers which they define as "skilled sub-professional white-collar workers" (1976:205,206). with regard to social relations, their impression is that the general milieu of the commmunity college classroom bears more resemblance to the high school than to the university. community colleges have often been described as "high schools with ashtrays" (1976: 2] 2). more guidance and control is operative in the community college, there is much less room for individual decisionmaking regarding selection of courses, and the student is restrictd in the pursuit of a liberal education. bowles and gintis also remark that discipline is stressed much more in the community college than in the university, with specific assignments and deadlines more likely to be employed in evaluation procedures. bowles and gintis' work has been helpful in identifying elements of the education system which had previously escaped 141 the attention of sociologists. their contribution has, however, met with a critical reception from neo-marxists as well as sociologists of other theoretical persuasions. the most pervasive objection to their analysis is that it over-estimates the fit between education systems and the capitalist workplace. shapiro (1980), while defending the position that schools assist in the maintnance of the capitalist system, allows the school much more autonomy from the direct influence of capital on educational policy. he suggests that, far from being completely malleable, education systems experience much conflict and contradiction. gorlick c1977) and apple (1980) join in this criticism, contending that students do not merely submit passively to the social relations of the classroom. moreover, worker resistance to the social relations in the workplace is ubiquitous. the implication is that the correspondence principle may not be functioning as bowles and gintis believe. another major problem is that bowles and gintis' approach neglects a large area of investigation which may be crucial in explicating the ideological role of education systems in capitalist society. the concern here is that bowles and gintis have taken for granted the formal or overt curriculum of the school by focusing almost exclusively on what has been feferred to as the "hidden curriculum" (white , 1980 : 56 , 57 , 81) . in the sociology of education literature, the "hidden curriculum" pertains to the mechanisms by which values and norms are promoted by the school. as opposed to the formal content of the explicit curriculum (i.e., such school subjects as alternate routes vol. 5 1982 142 mathematics and reading) , the "hidden curriculum" operates through "the organization of the classroom and the rewards and punishments schools employ to regulate student behavior" (. hum, 1978 : 192) . in this context, because bowles and gintis view the relationship between the education system and the workplace almost exclusively in terms of how the former reproduces the social relations of work, they omit analysis of what is transmitted to students through the overt or explicit curriculum. recent developments in the perspective emerging in britain "the new sociology of education", have challenged this convention of taking the school curriculum as a given. this work points to the importance of examining the nature of school knowledge, an area which has previously remained o unexplored by sociologists. bowles and gintis' assumption that the capitalist system does not rely upon the school for technical skills appears to have prevented them from considering the fact that students at all levels of the education system spend most of their school hours learning and being taught what is presented as "objective knowledge". even if it is conceded that the school's role in reproducing the social relations of production supercedes its contribution to the technical forces of production, it would not be safe to assume that the school has no contribution to nake in training workers to perform specific skills. many workers arrive at the workplace ready to carry out tasks which rhey would be unprepared to conduct successfully if it were not for their educational experience. for example, the computer programmer must learn the skills necessary to command particular 143 computer operations, the draughtsman must be proficient in executing designs on the draughtboard, and the medical practicioner must know the appropriate treatments to prescribe for given illnesses. that the educational system at various levels has the capacity to equip individuals with skills which are, to some extent, applicable in the workplace cannot be q debated. what can be questioned is the logic by which these skills are organized or divided in the capitalist workplace and, subsequently, how the education system succeeds or fails in responding to such logic. it is in this respect that it becomes important to closely scrutinize the overt curriculum which pertains to the delivery of technical skill , and how it relates to the capitalist workplace. from this vantage point, what warrants study is not only the varying social relations at different levels of the education system but, also, the types of knowledge which are peculiar to particular levels. the sociological investigation of classroom knowledge is particularly important when it is considered that the education system is purported to be an agency which generates and dispenses "knowledge". this is not intended to suggest that the elements of the hidden curriculum are of no significance. as apple proposes (1979:40), there is a complementary interplay between the social relations of the classroom and the formal corpus of school knowledge. nevertheless, it is certainly true that sociologists need to know much more about classroom knowledge and its affinity to the workplace. before proceeding to an examination of the relationship between the community college curriculum and the organization alternate routes vol. 5 1982 144 of the capitalist labour process, it is necessary to review some of the primary characteristics of the latter. the owners of the means of production organize and control the labour process to correspond to their interests. work under capitalism is not arranged and modified according to the needs of the workers who perform the labour. braverman's (1974) work has been useful in identifying features of the division of labour in monopoly capitalism. a central theme in his writing is that the capitalist labour process separates the functions of conception and execution: "the separation of hand and brain is the most decisive single step in the division of labour taken by the capitalist mode of production" (braverman, 1974 : 126). this separation results in a small number of managers becoming responsible for the mental labour involved in planning and organizing production while the majority of workers simply carry out the work which has been conceived by management. effectively, capital's monopolization of the technical knowledge of the labour process is ensured and workers are prevented from initiating any changes in the organization of production. poulantzas (1978) has given more rigorous theoretical attention to the notion of the separation of conception from execution, which he speaks of as the mental/manual division of labour. he is emphatic on the point that the division of mental and manual labour is essentially an ideological division rather than one inherent in the actual technologies of capitalist production. it is in this context that he writes (1978:225): "in the actual organization of the labour process, the social division of labour, directly dependant on the relations of 145 production, dominates the technical division." echoing braverman, poulantzas asserts that this division takes place as a condition for ensuring that knowledge is monopolized by capital, through its agents, and removed from the direct producers or manual labourers. the work of mental labour is more precisely delimited in the following manner (1978:238): we could thus say that every form of work that takes the form of a knowledge from which the direct producers are excluded, falls on the mental labour side of the capitalist production process, irrespective of its empirical/natural content, and that this is so whether the direct producers actually do know how to perform this work but do not do so (again not by chance) , or whether they in fact do not know how to perform it (since they are systematically kept away from it) , or whether again there is quite simply nothing that needs to be known. the management and supervision of workers, which constitutes political relations in the capitalist labour process, are legitimized by the division of mental and manual labour. the functions of management and supervision in their capitalist form are justified by the concentration of knowledge or technical expertise in the hands of those individuals who carry out these functions. poulantzas describes this monopolization as a "secrecy of knowledge" which excludes manual labour and is a further step in the capitalist compulsion to detach the direct producers from their means of production. manual labourers are ideologcally dominated by capital in the sense that the knowledge they are supposed not to possess is depicted as the basis for their preclusion from participation in the organization of production. poulantzas elaborates (1978:241) it is not by chance that the various categories of foreman who perform direct supervisory tasks also alternate routes vol. 5 1982 146 present thenselves as bearers of a particular knowledge in relation to the workers whom they control. this is precisely how this work of management and control that is necessary to every "co-operative process" falls to mental labour within the capitalist social division of labour. gorz (1976:175,176) provides a good example of how the possession of knowledge is used to defend political relations, citing the reflections of a technician who justified his supervisory role over manual workers on the basis of his aquisition of training in calculus. the technician admitted he did not use calculus in his job and that workers could gain comparable knowledge through practical experience. he maintained, however, that his calculus set him apart from other workers because he had gained a more comprehensive theoretical knowledge of the work supervised. most of poulantzas' discussion of mental and manual labour is specific to his theory of the political and ideological determinants of the "new petty bourgeoisie". the "new petty bourgeoisie" are agents of capital who perform unproductive labour (economic determination), carry out the functions of supervision and management in the labour process (political determination) , and are located primarily on the mental side of the division between mental and manual labour (ideological determination). it is not necessary, however, to view the division between mental and manual labour only as it pertains to the class determination of the new petty bourgeoisie. the division between mental and manual labour has wider applications. it exists in varying degrees within mental and manual labour and can be understood as a process tendential to 147 1 2 alj levels of the labour process (1978:255). on the side of manual labour, poulantzas notes that the division between mental and manual labour is manifested in the various partitions of skill that exist in the labour process (unskilled, semi-skilled , etc. ) . understood as a monopolization of knowledge which legitimates political relations, the division between mental and manual labour can also be detected in work categories which have traditionally been perceived as mental in orientation. braverman (1974:243-258) illustrates this point in his treatment of how the functions of conception and execution are separated in clerical work as management takes possession of the knowledge involved in the technology of office work. the same holds true for scientific workers who perform supervisory and management functions. braverman (1974:236-247) portrays their work as being divided in such a manner that knowledge is concentrated in varying measures at different levels within their ranks. poulantzas devotes considerable attention to the contribution of the capitalist education system to the reproduction of the division between mental and manual labour (1978:259-270). although based upon observations of the french educational system, his basic propositions may be reworked and applied to the role played by community colleges in the division between mental and manual labour. first, poulantzas considers the major role of the school to be the preparation of mental labour for its function in capitalist production. at the level of higher education, this is achieved through the provision of a general knowledge of the symbols and rituals of technical expertise appropriate to mental labour. alternate routes vol. 5 1982 148 at levels ir the system charged with preparation for manual labour, interest is mainly in teaching "discipline, respect for authority, and the veneration of mental labour that is always "somewhere else" in the educational apparatus" (1978: 266). poulantzas assigns no weight to the ability of the educational system to transfer specific skills to students who will carry out manual work. all components of the educational process in elementary and secondary schools are dismissed as having no utility, with the exception of the hidden curriculum. similarly, poulantzas proposes that the education of mental labour is so general that it is not geared toward providing specific technical skills. again, he emphasizes that the primarv educational transmission at this level entails the ideological "secrecy of knowledge" which elevates mental labour above manual labour. poulantzas' position is well summarized in the following statement (1978:266): the main role of the capitalist school is not to "qualify" manual and mental labour in different ways, but far more to disqualify manual labour (to subjugate it) , by only qualifying mental labour there is no doubt that, in expounding his position on education, poulantzas has exaggerated the role of the division between mental and manual labour. in dichotomizing the education system in terms of preparation for mental and manual labour, he ignores subtle variations at different levels in the system. in one sense, it could even be argued that poulantzas' analysis of the training of manual labour brings us no further than the correspondence principle, in that he reduces the schooling process to the operation of the hidden curriculum. what is seminal about poulantzas' thinking on the school, however, is 149 that he credits the education system with the capacity to inculcate particular conceptions of mental and manual labour which aid in the legitimation of the capitalist division of labour . elements of the division between mental and manual labour are visible in the way in which the education system fragments knowledge to reflect different levels of skills. this is evident in the categories of credentials for many professional specializations, each purporting to correspond to a particular concentration of knowledge or technical expertise. the community college system plays a crucial role in this fragmentation of knowledge. in many cases, the programs available to students relegate them to places in the labour process which are associated with lower or intermediate rungs in the hierarchy of knowledge. graduates of university programs, on the other hand, are placed in the upper reaches of the hierarchy^ if we refer to the division between mental and manual labour in terms of the propensity for knowledge to be monopolized at certain levels in the labour process, it is not difficult to locate community college graduates on the manual side of the division in contrast to university graduates. the discrepancy between the places occupied by the two groups in the workplace is demonstrated in table 1, which presents the most frequent occupational categories of students who graduated from community colleges and universities in 1976. the figures are based on the 1978 statistics canada employment outcome survey, involving a sample of 29,609 postsecondary graduates (clark and zsigmond ,1981) . alternate routes vol. 5 1982 iso table 1 most frequent occupations of 1976 university and college graduates senior § middle managers management support (accountants, auditors, financial 5 personnel officers, etc.) architects 5 engineers architecture s engineering technologists, draughting occupations, surveyors salespeople (commodities) elementary 5 secondary school teaching 5 related occupations vocational § community college, § specialized teachers mathematicians, statiticians, computer scientists physicians, dentists, veterinarians pharmacists, dieticians, optometrists, medical 5 dental technologists nurses, therapists lawyers 5 other law occupations social welfare, community service workers finance 5 statistics clerks stenographers 5 typists general office clerks other » university average annual salary $ 5 college average annual salary $ 7.4 17,200 4.5 12,600 6.9 14,500 3.1 13,100 4.8 18,200 5.5 13,500 2.8 13,900 4.6 11,000 29.5 15,8-2.7 8,900 4.1 16,000 2.7 16,100 2.4 18,800 6.5 12,400 20.0 13,000 3.2 16,000 2.8 14,100 4.2 9,600 6.8 9,100 2.6 10,000 33.4 13,500 39.7 12,500 100.0 100.0total source: table 1 is taken from tab]e 6 and 7 of clark and zsigmond (1981:63,67). the figures represent estimates based on the total sub-sample of 18,849 university graduates and 10,790 college graduates. data on the occupations of 4,629 respondents (15.61 of the total sample) were not available. only the ten most frequent occuptional categories for each group are indicated. consequently, emptv cells do not imply freqencies of zero. the actual frequencies for many of the emptv cells, however, would be too small to permit statistical reliability sub-sample sizes and missing data documentation arp derived from the statistics canada 1976 employment outcome survey data file maintained by the social science data archives, carleton university, ottawa. 151 the sample was designed to represent the 1976 canadian cohort of 26,250 "college", and 66,481 university graduates from nine provinces (qubec was excluded). the tabulations reveal that, relative to university graduates, community college graduates have a much lower rate of participation at the managerial decision-making level. moreover, the large differences in salaries imply that community college graduates who are employed in this category are likely to be assigned to the lower echelons. their representation in the "management support" category leads to a similar conclusion about their position in the workplace relative to university graduates. the clerical occupations, where a large number of community college graduates are clustered, suggest roles comprised of little control over the direction and organization of work. it is also notable that, in the classifications related to engineering and health services, community college graduates fulfil support or assistant functions to higher level positions which are linked to university training. a range of occupational specializations, such as business administration, engineering, and health sciences, may be pursued at both the university and community college levels. what often distinguishes community college programs from university programs within the same specialization, however, is that recruits of the former are prepared for positions which are frequently subject to the supervision of university graduates in the political relations of the labour process. titles such as "assistants", "technicians"., and "technologists" abound in the course offerings of community colleges and are alternate routes vol. 5 1982 152 indicative of the positions community college graduates occupy vis-a-vis workers who have completed university degrees. the specific tasks which its graduates are and are not qualified to perform in the actual work setting are often made quite explicit by the community college. for instance, in an academic calendar for one of ontario's colleges of applied arts and technology (caats) , the roles of graduates are often negatively defined in terms of what the graduate cannot expect to do. it is not uncommon for course descriptions to declare that certain work duties are reserved only for individuals who possess the kind of advanced training provided by universities. in turn, students are alerted to the fact that these superiorqualified workers will be responsible for supervising the work of community college graduates. one is left with the distinct impression that this community college wished to allay any illusions about the scope of the training it provided, and to establish that the knowledge it had to offer was inferior to that of the university. a good example of how the community college circumscribes the range of students' work skills in relation to "advanced" university education is provided in the training of engineering technicians and technologists. accounting for about 16.2 per cent of community college graduates in 1976 (clark and zsigmond, 1981:54), the case of technicians and technologists is worth chronicling in some detail. a unesco document which reports on an international comparison of the education of technicians and technologists, describes the work of this group as "middle men". according to the report, their activities fall between 153 lower level "craftsmen" and university trained engineers, "top level personnel" (french. 1981 : 16-17 ) . braverman (1974: 236-247) has noted that, under monopoly capitalism, the separation of conception from execution has penetrated the work of engineers and other scientists. he atttributes the appearance of a middle layer cadre of technical workers to this phenomenon within the engineering profession. referring to the new group of technical workers, he writes (1974:245,246): there is generally no accepted definition of the term but the distinguishing characteristic of the technician is that he or she functions as a "support" for the engineer or scientist; the routine which can be passed to a lower-paid and slightly trained person goes to the technician. the two to three year community college training period undergone by canadian technicians and technologists would 17 suggest that they are more than "slightly" trained. utilizing poulantzas' criterion, however, it is clear that this group would incline towards the manual side of the division between mental and manual labour, in light of their relationship to engineers. in the province of ontario, materials promoting technician and technologist careers in the various engineering specialities emphasize that training in such fields offers challenging opportunities in the labour force, where comprehensive practical and theoretical skills will be demanded. the accompanying enumerations of routines in which graduates are expected to show competence, point, however, to very specific work skills. the materials intimate that more creative work is the preserve of professional engineers who will summon the services of alternate routes vol. 5 1982 technicians and technologists to implement the practical operations necessary to test their ideas. when more stimulating responsibilities are delegated, aspiring technicians and technologists are assured that engineers will often be available to provide direction. it is not unreasonable to speculate that engineering technology students are reminded daily of the relative merits of their knowledge to that of engineers. frequently, their instructors are professional engineers who have had several years of industrial experience before teaching. not only is educational experience presented as the basis for the exclusion of technicians and technologists from much of the work of engineers, but, within the area of engineering technology itself, there is a further differentiation. the training of technicians, which normally lasts for two years in the community college, is designed to develop skills which are more manual in nature than those of the technologist. the technologist, whose schooling is extended to an additional year, is supposedly certified for more theoretical pursuits. as an electronics engineering technology instructor in an ontario caat put it, the work of the technician is a "hands-on operation" while the technologist's duties require more "thinking". in turn, just as the engineer's training justifies the supervisory role over technicians 3nd technologists, the technologist will sometimes be responsible for overseeing the work of technicians. in ontario, many of the technician and technology programs share a common core of courses during the first four semesters of study, with technologists remaining for a fifth and sixth semester. eight months' of supplementary 1ss training apparently equips technologists with the necessary knowledge to enable them to take a superordinate position to technicians. the role of the educational system in the legitimation of political relations in the labour process is particularly evident in this example. the argument has additional cogency when we consider that the schooling of most engineers, whose knowledge is reputed to be "advanced" in comparison to the knowledge of technicians and technologists, takes place in four years of university training. the education system makes a very definitive contribution to the reproduction of the division between mental and manual labour as it applies to the case of engineers and the engineering technology coterie. in fact, the education system appears to have been structured to permanently maintain the sharp division between the two groups. to take the example of ontario again, the terminal quality of community college credentials prevents technicians and technologists from building on their educational experience to become engineers. the only course open to themis to enrol in a university engineering program. clement (1981: 213-214) provides a good example of this educational barrier in one of the inco mining company's research and development department where engineers and technicians worked closely together in a team environment. in spite of a fair degree of autonomy and input into the research process, the only strategy for career mobility available to the community collegetrained technician was a return to school to pursue a university degree. because the diplomas and certificates awarded by caats are not transferable to university programs, to attain the status of alternate routes vol. 5 1982 is6 engineer the technician or technologist must return to "square one" in the postsecondary system. while i have focused on the training of engineering technicians and technologists, it would not be difficult to expand the analysis to other community college programs. as alluded earlier, a large number of programs are geared towards preparing graduates for roles in the workplace which are subordinate to positions filled by individuals with university training. with its many skill distinctions, the health sciences field provides parallels to the engineering speciality in terms of the division between mental and manual labour. community college programs related to dental, laboratory, and pharmacy technology are also comparable to engineering technician and technologist programs. the field of nursing comprises the largest segment of community college graduates. this is clearly a field subservient to medical careers reserved for university graduates, including nurses trained in four-year bachelor of science programs. finally, community college courses that provide training for cartographic, survey, architectural, museum, and library technicians, and assistants in the legal and accounting professions, can be situated within this 19 discussion. theorists influenced by the technological functionalist paradigm might, argue that the various divisions in postsecondary education reflect the need to arrange the education system in a manner which efficiently transmits technical skills. included in this tradition would be the insistence that advances in science and technology have made it necessary to organize 157 training so that certain individuals master the practical skills required to execute technical advances made in production. at a more theoretical level, the education system is requested to supply a cadre of experts who posses the esoteric knowledge needed to introduce improvements and innovations, as well as to supervise workers who are involved in more rudimentary facets of production. implicit in this view is the assumption that the arrangement of technical roles in production emanates naturally from the progress of technology, and that the labour process is rationally organized to guarantee that production proceeds at maximum efficiency. it is not reconcilable with the marxist premise that the technical division of labour is shaped by the social division of labour. the ideological components of the education system, which operate to maintain the technical division of labour endemic to capitalism, are undiscovered because the technical knowledge disseminated by the school and its application to production are taken for granted. the thesis of this paper also contradicts some of the tenets of bowles and gintis' neo-marxist approach. they do not include an analysis of the formal curriculum of the school and it will be recalled that they perceive the education system as engaged chiefly in the preparation of workers for the social relations of production rather than the training of students for technical competence in the field of work. i submit, however, that the transmission of work skills is central to the role of the community college system. this training function is relevant not so much for its technical alternate routes vol. 5 1982 158 contribution to production, as for its ideological role in the reproduction between mental and manual labour. this position has a number of implications for further research. several questions arise regarding mechanisms within the community college curriculum which serve to mould students' conceptions about their role in the labour process. it is important to focus on how the knowledge presented in the community college classroom is compared to the knowledge university graduates are believed to possess. the promotional literature which the community college prepares to attract its clientele seems to convey the notion that the community college is more elementary than the university. the actual dynamics of how this view is imparted to students, however, requires examination. answers to these questions may revolve primarily around an appraisal of the overt curriculum. the problem of how constituents of the hidden curriculum interact and conform with the overt curriculum may also be relevant. in this connection, it would be appropriate to consider how the modes of social control and organizational structures within the two main branches of postsecondary education reinforce the division between mental and manual labour. in focusing on particular programs, careful attention must be given to the way in which community college curricula vary from university programs in comparable specialities. it may be that community college and university students in related fields share similar curriculum content. if so, an identification of the efforts made to legitimize these similarities will become an essential part of the investigation. an integral component 159 of the overall inquiry would be an examination of the responses of community college students to their anticipated roles in the workplace as well as their perceptions of the positions they will assume in relation to university students. more particularly, such an analysis would be remiss if it failed to probe the possible forms of resistance which community college students exhibit toward the school's assignment of their position in the labour process. the research concerns posed above coincide with many of the questions which have been generated by the "new sociology of education" and methods which have predominated in research being carried out within this perspective may be borrowed. qualitative approaches aimed at uncovering elements of the curriculum which assist in the reproduction of the division between mental and manual labour would have great utility in addressing these questions empirically. this would entail lengthy observations in classrooms in order to assess the content of the curriculum as it relates to the labour process, its mode of presentation and the student response to it. further insight could be gained through informal discussions with students, instructors and administrators. without doubt, such a research programmatic would demand tremendous resources of time and commitment from investigators. in this way, much could be learned, however, not only about the role played by the school in the reproduction of the division between mental and manual labour, but also about the wider ideological processes in which the community college is immersed. alternate routes vol. 5 1982 notes various authors point to the fact that community college students are recruited from lower income and education groups than are students in universities. in addition, the positions which community college graduates eventually occupy in the work world are inferior to those of university graduates in terms of prestige and financial reward. canadian data on the background characteristics of university and community college students show a similar trend for canada (pike, 1980:130; porter, porter and blishen, 1979; dennison et al.,1975). supplementary to the family background data, a statistics canada (clark and zsigmond, 1981) report on 1976 postsecondary graduates confirms that community college graduates command lower salaries than their university trained counterparts. it should be stated at the outset that the nature of community colleges varies by province in canada. some community colleges offer only terminal career programs (ontario) while others offer a mixture of terminal programs and programs which may be continued or transferred to studies at universites (british columbia, quebec'. at the same time, community colleges have in common a non-degree granting status. for more detailed accounts of the diversity of community colleges in canada, consult martin and mcdonell (1978:28-32) and harvey [1973:57-60). see karabel and halsey's (197") review of theoretical work in the sociology of education, where the tenets of technological functionalism and other competing theoretical perspectives in the sub-discipline are delineated . several other american educational theorists have posited similar versions of bowles and gintis' 'correspondence principle" (behn, et al. ,1976; carter, 19"6; levin, 1976). it is interesting to note that they draw attention to the fact that the carnegie commission on higher education in the united states has had a significant impact on the patterning of the community college system in the united states. their insinuation is that capital's interests have been represented in the development of policy on community college education. they also note, as has karabel (1977), that the needs of capital in the area of curricula are represented on an ongoing basis by members from local business communities on community college advisory boards. paul willis' (1977) important british study gives empirical support to this contention. 161 7. in some instances, it is difficult to separate the hidden and overt curricula, since both have the ability to impart norms and values. for example, mcdiarimid and pratt (1971) have demonstrated that the presentation of canadian history in elementary schools (which would be identified as part of the overt curriculum) has often encouraged negative values and beliefs about trade unions, racial groups, and certain political systems, etc. 8 advocates of this perspective prescribe a sociology of education which takes as problematic "what counts as educational knowledge and how it is made available" (young, 1971: 2) . although much of this work focuses on classroom knowledge as negotiable between teachers and students and has been faulted for failing to take into account the external structural constraints on the school (sharp and green, 1975 : 16 -35) , it has stimulated research in the area of curriculum. for a review of the major theoretical positions of the "new sociology of education" see hum (1976). 9 this remark must be qualified with the acknowledgement that we may question how well the education system prepares individuals. collins (1979) has argued persuasively that the education system is less efficient as a training ground for workers than on-the-job training. he contends that workers must supplement their educational training with much practical work experience before they become successful at their work. 10. braverman (1974:114) notes that the designation "separation of conception from execution" and "the separation of mental and manual labour" are roughly equivalent. however, he favours the use of the "separation of conception from execution" since it applies not only to the removal of conception (brain workl from the work of those who perform manual labour (hand work), but also to mental labour itself. 11 in making use of poulantzas' concept of the division between mental and manual labour it is not imperative to accept his theorizing on the determination of class boundaries in toto. for example, wright (1978a:53) questions the validity of using the division between mental and manual labour as the ideological determinant of class boundaries when there are many forms of ideological domination in the labour process. notwithstanding this reservation, wright (1978b : 196-197) concurs that the division is an important form ot ideological domination. 12 poulantzas suggests that it is not appropriate to think of the division between mental and manual labour in 162 terms of "clean jobs" and "dirty jobs", and reminds us that no work can be conceived of as totally devoid of a mental or intellectual component (1978:325,254). 13. see shapiro (1980) for an excellent exposition of the major insights of poulantzas on education. 14. in one of his last essays, john porter (1979:263-280) cites braverman's analysis of "the degradation of work in the twentieth century". porter noted that the education system has spawned an "elite" of highly educated experts whose university training places them in a powerful position in production. in spite of the inflated qualifications needed to procure positions under the experts, porter suggested that many of these subordinate roles involved routinized work that really required little training. while he hesitated to lay the blame on the technical division of labour unique to capitalism, porter was andamant in his assessment that our esteem for credentials represented a misplaced respect that contributed to inequality in access to material privileges and input in the shaping of future society. 15. the statistics canada report grouped all non-university postsecondary graduates under the category of "colleges" (clark and zsigmond , 1981 : 38) . included in this grouping were graduates of colleges of applied arts and sciences, community colleges, institutes of technology, and all other postsecondary institutions which do not offer degree programs (e.g. surveying, agriculture, and nursing schools). the term "college" is equivalent to the term "community college" used throughout this paper . 16. american writers have recognized other features of the community college which are inferior to the university in the united states (zwerling , 1976 ; aronowitz , 1973 : 90-91). these authors call attention to the disparity between the two types of institutions with regard to the funds at their disposal for physical and cultural resources, and point to a cultural poverty of community college campus life. 17. french (1981:87-89) gives a brief overview of canada's system for training technicians and technologists. 18. in ontario, community college instructors are required to have work experience in an area other than teaching. 19. for a more comprehensive list of similar courses of instruction available at the community college level in ontario see horizons 1981/82 (ontario ministry of colleges and universities, 1981:10-17). 163 references apple, michael, w. 1979 ideology and curriculum . london: routledge and kegan pau 1 . 1980 "the other side of the hidden curriculum: correspondence theories and the labour process." interchange , ll(3):s-22. aronowitz, stanley 197 3 false promise: the shaping of american worjcing class consciousnesti new york: mcgraw-hill book company. behn, william h. et al. 1976 "school is bad; work is worse" .martin carnoy and henry m. levin (eds) , the limits of educational reform . new york: david mckay company, inc . : 219244. bleasdale, graham 1978 "towards a political economy of capitalist educational values". randle w. nelson and david a. nock (eds), reading, writing and riches: education and the socio-economic order in north america . toronto : between the lines:ll-39. bowles, samuel and herbert gintis 197 6 schooling in capitalist america: educational reform and the contradictions of economic li f e . new york: basic books inc. braverman, harry 197 4 labour and monopoly capital: the degradation of work in the twentieth century . new york: monthly review press. carter, michael a. 1976 "contradiction and correspondence: analysis of the relation of schooling to work.", martin carnoy and henry m. levin (eds) , t he limits of educational reform . new york: david mckay company, inc . : 219244 . clark, burton r. 1962 educating the expert society . san francisco: chandler publishing company. clark, w and z. zsigmond 1981 job market reality for postsecondary graduates: employment outcome by 1978, two years after graduation"! ottawa: statistics canada . 164 clement, wallace 1981 hard rock mining: industrial relations and technological change at inco . toronto: mcclelland and stewart limited . collins, randall 197 9 the credential society: an historical sociology of education and stratification . new york: academic press. dennison, john d. et al. 197 5 the impact of community colleges: a study of the college concept in british columbia . vancouver : btc. research. french, h.w. 1981 engineering technicians: some problems of nomenclature and classification . paris :unesco . gorlick, sherry 1977 "undermining hierarchy: problems of schooling in capitalist america." monthly review 29(5): 20-36. gorz, andre 1976 "technology, technicians and class struggle." andre gorz fed), the division of labour: the labour process and class struggle in modern capitalism . sussex: the harvester press limited: 159-189. harp, john 1980 "social inequalities and the transmission of knowledge: the case against the schools." john harp and john r. hof ley (eds) , s tructured inequality in canada . scarborough, ontario: prentice-hall of canada: 219-246. harvey, edward 1974 educational systems and the labour market toronto : longman canada limited. hurn, christopher j. 1976 "recent trends in the sociology of education in britaid." harvard educational review 46(1): 105-114. 1978 the limits and possibilities of schooling . boston: allyn and bacon, inc. karabel, jerome 1977 "community colleges and social stratification: submerged class conflict in american higher education." jerome karabel and a.h. halsey eds), power and ideology in education .new york: oxford university press: 232253 . 165 karabel, jerome and a.h. halsey 1977 "educational research: a review and interpretation." jerome karabel and a.h. halsey (eds) , power and ideology in education . new york: oxford university press: 1-85. levin, henry m. 1976 "educational reform: its meaning?" martin carnoy and henry m. levin (eds) , the limits of educational reform . new york: david mckay company, inc . : 23 51 . martin, wilfred b. and allan j. macdonell 197 8 canadian education: a sociological analysis scarborough, ontario: prentice hall of canada ltd. mayes, sharon s. 1977 "the increasing stratification of higher education: ideology and consequence." the journal of educational thought 11 f 1 ) : 16-27. mcdiarmid, garnet and david pratt 1971 teaching prejudice . toronto: ontario institute for studies in education. ministry of colleges and universities 1981 horizons 1981/82 . toronto: ministry of colleges and universities . pike, robert m. 1980 "education, class, and power in canada." richard ossenberg (ed) , power and change in canada . toronto: mcclelland and stewart ltd. 1981 sociological research on higher education 1970-1980: a review of some main" themes in the english language literature . paper presented at the annual meetings of the canadian society for the study of higher education, halifax, nova scotia. pincus, fred 1978 "tracking and community colleges." randle w. nelson and david a. nock (eds), reading , writing and riches .toronto : between the lines:171-211. 1980 "the false promises of community colleges: class conflict and vocational education." harvard educational review 50 (3) : 332361 . 166 porter m.r. and j.porter and b.r.blishen 1979 does money matter? toronto: macmillan of canada . porter, john 1979 the measure of canadian society: education , equality, and opportunity"! toronto : gage publishing limited. poulantzas, nicos 1978 classes in contemporary capitalism . london: verso . shapiro, h. svi 1980 "education and the state in capitalist society: aspects of the sociology of nicos poulantzas." harvard educational review 50 (3) : 3 21 -331"! sharp, rachel and anthony green 197 5 education and social control: a study in progressive primary education . london: routledge and kegan paul. schecter, stephen 1977 "capitalism, class and educational reform in canada." leo panitch (ed) , the canadian state . toronto: university of toronto press: 373-416. white, robert 1980 "knowledge and power: determinants of educational curriculum." alternate routes 4:53-85. willis, paul 1977 learning to labour . westmead, england: saxon house. wright, erik olin 1978a class, crisis and the state . london: verso. 1978b "intellectuals and the class structure of capitalist society." pat walker (ed) , between labour and capital. montreal: black rose books: 191 -211. young, michael r.d. (ed) 1971 knowledge and control: new directions for the sociology of education" london: coll i ermacmillan publishers. zweling, l.s. 197 6 second best: the crisis of the community college . new york: mcgraw hill. indigenous takes on environmentalism: | 259 indigenous takes on environmentalism: an interview on the front lines of indigenous land defense megan kinch1 in conversation with giibwanisi, anishinaabek nation2; kaikakons, anishinaabek naiton3; sleeping grizzly, haudenosaunee nation4 background and context doing an interview with someone who is currently doing a land reclamation meant that the usual email method had to be modified a bit. as giibwanasi is currently on location at the site, answering my emailed questions would have meant typing out essays on a smartphone. so instead, after a long day chopping wood and doing work, he read my questions to himself and his friends kaikaikons and sleeping grizzly, and they answered in the form of a conversation by the fire. the oshkimaadiziig unity camp is a land occupation and cultural revitalization project: the anishinabek confederacy to invoke our nationhood (action). what follows, is a shortened and condensed version of their discussion. discussion megan kinch (mk): mainstream environmentalism has been hopelessly sidetracked into greenwashing, environmental capitalism and tokenistic gestures. when even david suzuki is writing essays about the failure of environmentalism, we know that something has gone wrong. people 1 megan kinch is a journalist and activist in toronto with the toronto media co-op and basics community news service. 2 giibwanisi, bear clan of the anishinaabek nation, and is a co-founder of the oshkimaadziig unity camp and action. 3 kaikaikons, loon clan of the anishinaabek nation, is also a co-founder of the oshkimaadziig univty camp and action. 4 sleeping grizzly, bear clan of the haudenosaunee nation and a member of the oshkimaadziig unity camp. 260 | climate change and its discontents affiliated with “environmental justice” movements in canada have been trying to address previous shortcomings by putting solidarity with indigenous people at the forefront, but it hasn’t gathered the kind of support that mainstream environmentalism used to enjoy, nor has it been able to define what exactly that solidarity means. do you see your struggle as relating to environmentalism? is there an “environmental movement” that you feel could support struggles like yours? or does a new movement have to be built from the ground up? kaikaikon: if you want to call our struggle “environmentalism” yes, sure, but at the same time we are much more than that. it’s a spiritual struggle, it’s a political struggle. [our struggle is] a different kind, we have a way of life. its environmentalism, its spiritualism, its matriarchy. environmentalism is just one aspect of it. we are so much more. its [limiting it to just environmentalism is] kind of like bastardizing who we are. giibwanasi: to answer that question i think you have to look at the medicine wheel and you have to look at the physical, the emotional, the mental, the spiritual. the land, the air, the fire, the water. it is all one. one and the same. we cannot look at it as just one aspect of, one category... kaikaikon: its not under one genre or ideology of struggle or fight, you can’t categorize our fight as anishinaabe liberation movement and resistance. even the annishinaabek indigenous resistance movement where there’s our people who have security culture and i guess warrior-ism, for lack of a better word, what we’re doing is trying to achieve every aspect of who we once were and trying to bridge the gap with trying to live in this society with using the technology of everybody who is in that medicine wheel. when you go back and classify our individual struggle as environmentalism, then we got to say no. people have their own definition of ‘environmentalism’. greenpeace has their own view of environmentalism, and they are against seal hunts, which is people’s traditional diet and right to feed themselves from the land. if you want to start utilizing who you are, there are some things our allies may not agree with. hunting, trapping. and that’s not, in their eyes, environmentalism (laughs). indigenous takes on environmentalism: | 261 sleeping grizzly: it is not really environmentalism, it’s more of us living with the land with what the land provides. but don’t take from the land more than you need. when you take from the land you have to make sure that what you’re taking, like when we want firewood or we want to build a box or a canoe or something we’re going to take from the dead. we’ll only take from the living when we need to build something with structure, something that can dry over time and provide a lot of strength. something we can manipulate to the way that we need, but not take more than we need, just take what we need. giibwanasi: i have not seen an environmental movement that could support struggles like us because, as we said before, there are so many different genres of environmental “activism”, whether its fracking or tar sands or pipeline or nuclear or ‘save the water’ or ‘save the trees’ or ‘save the air’ or anything like that. there is not a single organization that i have seen that encompasses it all. so if you want to consider anishinaabekism or haudenosaunee-ism who stands against all of these things then i think that maybe if there is one of those things out there maybe, i don’t know, i have not seen it. “idle no more” seems to be about the water and some of bill c-38 and bill c-45 but at the same time they have their own view of liberation and they’re very exclusive. so a lot of the times we were not included into their liberation agenda. because at one time they were adamantly and vehemently opposed to blockades and land reclamations and they distanced themselves from them. sleeping grizzly: there is a group down in kansas city right now that are living off of 180 acres, they are planning to build and right now gathering supplies to...live off the land and what they can grow and gather themselves. kaikaikon: look at the different camps, like the unist’ot’en camp and all these similar actions who are living off the land. under the definition of what an “environmentalist” is i’m not too sure if it is, or is not, other indigenous nations (laughs). giibwanasi: ya, i think i’d have to agree with the unist’ot’en… kaikaikon:. because, first, under our teachings it says we have to concentrate on the south, the family, community, nation, the people of our turtle island, our continent. then we start making alliances with these 262 | climate change and its discontents other folks. and i think our ideas and teachings can really benefit this person whose asking these questions, but they could learn a lot from our people. even, all these questions, if they have some humility that they can adapt and just observe. because our people have been observing for thousands of years and survived, we’re still surviving. they can just observe from the people who’ve been here first and lived through a lot. a lot of environmental disruptions and we’re still here surviving. mk: your occupation at oshkimaadiziig unity camp is on the site of a council fire. it’s been an ongoing debate on the left as to how different peoples should relate to each other in struggle. some would argue that everyone should be in the same organizations and struggle on a class basis, others that nationally oppressed peoples need their own separate organizations which should relate to others. today, there is also the theory that settler organizers need to ‘take direction’ from native organizers, but this is more useful as a guideline for settlers participating in native struggles rather than as a directive for social movements as a whole. what do you think should be the organizing relationships between native and non-native people? kaikaikon: [in] my own opinion, what we’re trying to achieve here is we’re trying to create a confederacy, we’re trying to rebuild our confederacy. we had alliances with other indigenous nations like the haudenosaunee and the cree and the wendat, so we’re trying to build or own, reassert our own laws, our trade alliances and through that came the two-row [wampam]. and the settler society, we have an agreement with them we’re trying to uphold here. i don’t want to sound racist (laughs), i have to be careful about how i answer this. but our nations have been dealing with euro-centric people for too damn long. and we need to start any kind of agreement. it comes to a point [where] we need to drop out of these treaties and even the 1764 niagara covenant chain belt and reestablish something new [with] the other people who are oppressed from all over the world, something has to come representative of the 1764 niagara chain covenant belt, but something that is more representative of the minorities and the oppressed people. and when the question is asked “non-native people’ you have to ask “what non-native people’. i think we have to have an equal relationship but it has to be with people of struggle who come from other nations. and they have to maybe start a new government. indigenous takes on environmentalism: | 263 giibwanasi: so what should be the organizing relationship? kaikaikon: until that happens all lands come back to us! (chuckles) we can establish zones like their cities and shit where they can remain but we’re still the landlords. this is kind of radical but those people they need to overthrow their friggen governments. but we need to work with these people whoever are out there to overthrow the governments and the police and the military which is a damn hard thing to do, but we need to do that. and reestablishing our governance, our agreements, our relationships. and that i believe is the other minorities who come here. they don’t even know the relationship that exists and i think we’d find common ground to unite stronger. giibwanasi: going back to the two-row wampum, it says that we’re not supposed to steer each other’s boats. but the way that i perceive things is that the canoes have been hijacked and is actually aboard the settler ship. and we are basically trying to live our canoe way of life on top of that settler ship. so, saying that i’m not supposed to steer the settler ship. well you know what, my fucking canoe is sitting in that fucking settler ship. so national liberation for native people and organizing is like saying, you know what, i don’t want to tell you how to run your own fucking ship but you’re ship and the people that run it, the captains, they are not listening to the workers or to whoever, the deckhands and whatnot. so i guess the way to answer that question is, if you are not actively trying to overthrow the captain, then i think that maybe its time that we are in a position to say, you know what, in order to save humanity, to save ourselves, save turtle island, that ya, i think at some point, because the original agreements have been so intertwined and entangled, that i think at times that native people are, do have to be in a position to tell non-native people what to do. kaikaikon: we were just talking about this last night. and i was thinking about this all day to how to write this because its been on my mind for a while, because it needs to be said without hurting peoples 264 | climate change and its discontents feelings. because it needs to be said and it needs to be brought out amongst our brothers and sisters out there who are working with these activists in the different organizations. we’ve been colonized for so long, that some of us, even on the front line struggles and even back at home in our communities have developed a kind of syndrome that we’re kind of, all these fears and intimidations and feeling inferior to white people, is something that is internal and we’re dealing with. so when we’re working with these people how they come and ‘help’ there’s little subtle ways and different ways that they make our people feel inferior. me, i feel like i’m kind of like, were dependent on their help. so no matter how they’re trying to help, its funny but, they’re still the colonists, the white people are the colonists. because they’re helping to “decolonize,” but that word “colonize” is still in there. they are ‘decolonizing,” so they’re still the indian agents running around trying to do what’s best for indians. because they’re’ the ones who think they know it all so they’re helping us. even by answering these questions, even though we use the english language and their ideology we’re using everything that’s theirs. even their marxism. somewhere there’s our own war chiefs and our own ideas that answers these questions and that we should be using. we’re still finding out ourselves, but we need to utilize other peoples, the revolutionary schools of thought, i guess, marxism? mk: do you think that that their agreements such as the dish with one spoon and the two-row wampum are relevant here? do they apply to the state or do they apply to peoples including western revolutionaries? kaikaikon: what we’re trying to accomplish here is to rebuild ourselves and rebuild our alliances with other indigenous nations. our responsibility is to our people first and to our communities and our families. so it applies to the state and it applies to them. because what you said, we can’t answer that, its up to them. its up to these newcomers to settle that and fight amongst themselves on that. because we have our own fight to do trying to be with our people who are trying to speak and represent us, who are going against these original agreements, so we’re trying to liberate ourselves from what they’re doing to us, what our chief-and-council and these peoples are doing. so we’re trying to liberate ourselves so we gotta work together with our common allies to remove this shit in our own communities. so it is relevant. indigenous takes on environmentalism: | 265 giibwanasi: personally, i think that the two-row, the two relationships between settlers and native people that the two row is, is relevant because of the entire context … its fundamental principles. and the fundamental principals is the relationship, from an indigenous perspective, with the two-row wampum with everything. with the creator, the earth, the sun, the moon, the stars, the two leggeds, the four leggeds, the wingeds, the crawleds, the ones that go in the water, and i think that, ya, the founding principles of the two-row wampum, we could use those things. but at the same time, the two-row wampum was never entered into the one good mind from the settlers point of view. they did not use their one good mind to make this relationship. i think it can be applied if people come with that one good mind and they want to work together, i think that can be. but also understanding the two-row wampum with the settlers, that was made with mostly white people. and now we find that we live in a society out there where there are many people of many different colours. and if we go back to that settler ship there is class division on that settler ship. there is the captain, there was his lieutenants, there was the deckhands. there was indentured servants, and there were slaves stuffed in the back, stuffed in the bottom of those ships. so i think that the two-row wampum has to be inclusive of the other nations that are here. and i truly believe that had our people known that there were slaves stuffed into the bottom of those ships i truly believe that we probably never would have entered into those agreements, knowing how they treat other humans. because if we were to look and see those slaves, how could someone enter into one good mind with that? kaikaikon: the one dish one spoon is an agreement between indigenous nations that others right to live on a territory without interfering with each others right to eat. and to provide from those resources. gibwanasi: so basically you could apply that to organization kind of? kaikaikon: right, yes definitely. mk: to what extent do you find western philosophies of struggle – things like marxism, anarchism, social democracy – to be useful to you? i’ve seen you identify capitalism as a central force to struggle against, in addition to colonialism, does western analysis like marxism help in understanding those forces? what are the limits of these philosophies for your struggle? 266 | climate change and its discontents giibwanasi: from my own perspective, i have to be open-minded to everything, to all sorts of struggles including those mentioned above. but there are things that are useful and there are things that are not useful. i don’t ascribe to anarchism because i do not believe in disorganization. i like some of the things that are said about marxism, especially the scientific approach to understanding economy, political science, and all of that. but, at the same time, there are a lot of things that i do not agree with marxism. such as, they often omit two parts of the medicine wheel. marxism focuses on specifically ideology which is the mental, and probably the physical, like taking physical action of revolution. but they omit the emotional and the spiritual context of how we think and operate. 258 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism book review 500 years of indigenous resistance by gord hill. oakland, california: pm press, 2009. $10.00 us, paper. isbn: 978-1-60486-106-8. pages: 172. reviewed by kevin partridge1 gord hill originally published this work as part of a revolutionary indigenous newspaper in 1992 in order to provide a brief history of the colonization of the americas from 1492. it is aimed at a broad audience of people who are interested in reading a historical narrative that is often suppressed and excluded from many discussions of the colonization of the americas. it is well crafted for this purpose with its clear writing, brief length and interesting graphics by the author as well as the inclusion of some archival photographs. the arguments in the book are supported by a variety of citations and references that provide the reader with a good grasp of the field of research in which the author is locating his research. however, he does not reference many written sources and the book does not contain the sort of voluminous bibliographic information that is common to books aimed at a more academic audience. the author claims that this book is just a plain historical chronology, yet it is clearly guided by a theoretical understanding of colonization and historical development that is well developed and considerably at odds with much of history that is written from a eurocentric perspective. hill seems apologetic when he writes about his own lack of knowledge of “authentic indigenous philosophy” (p.5) but he provides a reflexive awareness of his own position as a member of the kwakiutl (kwakwaka’wakw) nation on the west coast, as well as his position as a political activist within a globalized system that continues to encroach upon indigenous lands. this is a book with a political purpose and it is useful for its qualities as a polemic and also for its straightforward explanation of the beliefs and motivations that lie behind the strong commitment shown by many people in indigenous activist communities around the globe. 1 kevin partridge is a ph.d. candidate in the department of sociology and anthropology at carleton university in ottawa. book review: 500 years of indigenous resistance | 259 this book should not be seen as a corrective to the current mainstream construction of the history of the americas a sort of liberal attempt to provide a balance of viewpoints but is instead an outline of a historical narrative that is created from the experiences of people who have often been eliminated from the historical record. the author is particularly interested in challenging the argument that colonization in the americas is a process that will eventually be of benefit to the colonized as well as the colonizer. he bluntly states that the colonization process has been an “american indian holocaust” (p.6) that resulted in the deaths of millions of people and the destruction of entire nations and their respective cultures and histories. he then goes on to provide some of the stories and evidence both of this destruction and the resistance that has accompanied it from the time of the first contact with europeans to current conflicts involving indigenous peoples. since the book was originally written in the early 1990s, the conflicts he describes include the oka confrontation in quebec, the lil’wat blockade in bc and an assault on logging operations on lubicon cree land in alberta. the book is composed of fifteen very short chapters that are organized in a broadly chronological order. they begin with a brief description of the multitude of peoples, nations and languages that were spread over the americas before columbus’s ship, the santa maria, landed somewhere in the caribbean region in 1492. the four pages allotted to this era is nowhere near enough space to do justice to the variety of histories that hill is trying to cover but he does convey a sense of the cultural richness of the americas. unfortunately, as he points out, there was little understanding of this cultural wealth on the part of the europeans who quickly grasped the material opportunities to finance their voyages by seizing goods and people using both deceit and superior weapons. this exploitation was rapidly formalized by the creation of colonial administrative structures guided by the expanding economic needs of european imperial countries. hill describes almost constant warfare and exploitation of labour, land and resources since european settlers first arrived. these struggles completely alter the social landscape of north america by bringing in people from many other places in the world as well as contributing to the deaths of many millions of indigenous people, the profound alteration of social structures that survived, and the export of a huge amount and variety of resources. hill provides a number of examples such as the brutal campaign to seize gold from the americas for shipment to spain (p.14). he also argues that there is a parallel history of resistance to these 260 | great recession-proof?: shattering the myth of canadian exceptionalism changes. he shifts his focus in the last two chapters to more specific struggles as he cites examples of confrontations at oka, oldman river and in the lil’wat nation in british columbia to show that indigenous resistance is still an active and viable force within the political landscape of canada in particular. this book was originally written as a response to the 500th anniversary of the landing of the santa maria. hill is presenting a history of resistance to this silencing of voices that is both still present and still relevant within our current political environment. he is successful in putting forward a narrative that illustrates both continuity and complexity. there is no attempt here to create a comprehensive story of the many nations that have been involved in this process and the focus of this book is primarily on canadian history. nor is he trying to argue the ‘truth’ behind the narratives. the length of the book does not allow for a great deal of discussion of the history that he presents. it appears that the point of the book, however, is not just to talk about history but to help change it. this book is successful in contributing to both the political dialogues and the struggles in which it is located. despite hill’s own doubts about his place amongst an ‘authentic’ indigenous philosophical tradition, this book shows that he has a definite and unique contribution to make to that history and this book is useful for those who are looking for alternative historical narratives and for people who may be trying to understand the motivations and understandings that lie behind apparently widely separated expressions of indigenous resistance that repeatedly crop up in the mainstream news with little explanation. this work is a valuable contribution that could be very useful for teachers, activists and others who are interested in challenging the often complacent acceptance of the colonization of the americas. symposium on brave rman between marxist orthodoxy and critical theory: comments on brave rman' s labor and monopoly capital michael burawoy one of the remarkable features of harry brave rman' s labor and monopoly capital has been its appeal to a wide range of different groups. it is used for courses in universities at both graduate and undergraduate level and in a variety of departments. it is used in community colleges, in trade union schools, in all sorts of study groups among workers and professionals. it is clearly destined to emerge as one of the giants of the marxist tradition. but it will not be confined to this tradition, since it has caught the imagination of non-marxists as much as of marxists. not surprisingly, therefore, labor and monopoly capital can be read in many different ways, and today i want to place it in the context of marxist debate. it is curious to note that widely divergent forms of marxism have embraced labor and monopoly capital as a pillar in their own tradition. in this book they have all found confirmation of their own position. in part this may reflect the fact that labor and monopoly capital is one of the first attempts to rewrite volume one of capital in the light of a century of development in both marxism and capitalism. however, an equally important reason for its appeal among divergent marxisms lies in its combination of themes from orthodox marxism with themes from critical theory. thus paul sweezy a relatively orthodox marxist can write that in terms of theory there is very little that is new in this book, while critical theorists have embraced it as a major theoretical contribution in the tradition of lukacs, adorno, horkheimer, marcuse and others. in this talk i propose to argue, like critical theorists, that the novelty of labor and monopoly capital lies in alternate routes harnessing their ideas to the understanding of monopoly capitalism through the examination of the labor process. but i shall also argue that this novelty is the very feature that poses an obstacle to braver-man's understanding of the nature of monopoly capitalism. what is this critical component in braverman? the subtitle of the book "the degradation of work in the twentieth century" indicates a critique in the obvious sense of the negative connotation of "degradation." but it involves another element, namely the notion of an alternative to the nature of work as we know it today. this refers not merely to an alternative in the past but more significantly to an alternative for the future. to critique, then, is to seek out the unrealized potential in the present and to point to the gap between what is and what could be. critique declares that what exists is not natural, inevitable or necessary but the product of very definite conditions which are not themselves immutable. thus, braverman attributes the degradation of work and the commodifi cation of life in general to the domination of capital. it is not only that work under monopoly capitalism becomes fractionalized into meaningless tasks but market forces invade all arenas of life turning relations among people into relations among things. even the family is "stripped for action in order to survive in the market society." in the remainder of this talk i shall argue that this critical component in braverman's analysis, while offering an appealing and plausible description of monopoly capitalism, only expresses rather than reveals the forces at work in an advanced capitalist society. first, his critique tends to interfere with the understanding of control characteristic of the capitalist labor process. second, it allows him to leave out of his analysis the political and ideological aspects of work. third, the form of critique allows him to ignore j symposium on braverman different forms of struggles as forces shaping the labor process. fourth, his conception of the capitalist totality prevents him from understanding how it reproduces itself. fifth, his point of critique leads him to portray socialism as a reversion to the past. sixth, and finally, braverman misses the specificity of the conditions of which labor and monopoly capital is a product, namely the specificity of monopoly capitalism in the united states. in all these respects, i shall argue, braverman 's analysis is limited by his critique but let me stress it is not critique per se but the particular critique which braverman adopts that poses as an obstacle to the understanding of monopoly capitalism. 1 . capital ist control to engage in critique is to evaluate and this involves the adoption of a standpoint, that is a point of critique. there was a time when marxists were unanimous in taking the standpoint of the proletariat. the position and interests of the proletariat provided a unique basis for understanding the capitalist totality. this optimism has lapsed as the working class of the advanced capitalist society has appeared to lose the revolutionary potential it may have had and as it has become involved in various forms of reactionary politics. critical theory has been left equivocating over its standpoint. in contrast to this studied skepticism braverman makes his point of critique unambiguously clear. it is the craft worker. moreover, it is not the craft worker dislocated from any historical context but the craft worker of early capitalism that braverman takes as a point of departure. with the rise of monopoly capitalism skill is expropriated from the craft worker and placed in the hands of the agents of capital. mental and manual labor are systematically divided or more precisely, as braverman puts it, there is a systematic separation of alternate routes conception and execution. braverman constitutes this development as the organizing principle of the labor process and social structure of monopoly capitalism. the separation of conception and execution is identified as the control peculiar to the capitalist labor process in general. however, one cannot get at what is fundamental to the capitalist labor process or capitalist control by looking at variations within capitalism as braverman does. what is fundamental to capitalist control is what all forms of capitalist control share and this can only be understood by contrast to forms of control under non-capitalist modes of production. there are a number of possibilities. one could examine the labor process under some pre-capitalist mode of production or pre-capitalist modes of production in general or one could draw upon notions of "control" or absence of control under socialism. unfortunately, but not surprisingly, our notions of socialism tend to be vague and too restricted by what we don't like about capitalism to be of much use as an analytical tool. rather 1 prefer to turn to the feudal mode of production and to begin from a conventional understanding of its labor process. while there is no time to enter into details here, by adopting feudalism as a point of departure the significant feature of capitalist control becomes the simultaneous obscuring and securing of surplus. whereas under feudalism surplus is pumped out of the direct producers through rent, is transparent and therefore has to be legitimated, under capitalism the existence of that surplus is obscured and this poses the problem of ensuring its existence. only when one has posed the question of capitalist control in such a general way can one return to the issue of the relationship of the separation of conception and execution to the capitalist labor process. we can ask, for example, about the limits on the separation 6 y symposium on braverman of conception and execution. thus, one might argue that if this separation is pushed too far then the securing of surplus becomes problematical, whereas if it is not pushed far enough the obscuring of surplus becomes problematical. in addition, the precise limits on the separation of conception and execution will themselves depend on certain historical conditions, revolving around the level of political and ideological as well as economic struggles. my first point, then, is that in taking the particular standpoint of the craft worker, braverman mistakes what is but a particular expression of the capitalist labor process for its essence. 2. the political and ideological aspects of the labor process in his concern for critique braverman quite deliberately restricts his analysis to the objective aspects of the labor process. the elimination of subjectivity is part and parcel of his critical analysis. under capitalism we lose control over the labor process, indeed over our lives in general and history is made behind our backs according to the imperatives of capital accumulation. but braverman not only speaks of control in this negative sense. he also speaks of it in the positive sense of extracting surplus labor time, compelling or persuading people to work hard enough to produce not merely the equivalent of their wage but in addition a surplus which can then be realized by the capitalist as profit. such control, however, presupposes the existence of a minimal consent to capitalist relations and this can be only understood through the study of the "subjective" components of the labor process, or what i shall call its ideological and political aspects. in other words, the very objective braverman sets for himselfto explain the generation of surplus under capitalism is incompatible with a critique that restricts the analysis of work to its "objective" component. alternate routes what, then, are the political and ideological dimensions of the labor process? again i cannot enter into details now, suffice to say that the political dimension refers to maintenance or reproduction of what i call the relations in production, that is the immediate production relations or the relations at the point of production among workers, supervisors, etc. on the shop floor. the ideological dimension refers to the production of experience, in particular the experience of the relations in production, how workers experience their position in the productive process and how their interests emerge out of the organization of work. in other words, the study of the political and ideological aspects of the labor process allows us to understand how surplus is produced through the organization of struggles and consent at the point of production. it is precisely in this area that industrial sociology sheds light on the labor process and the experience it produces. yet, braverman dismisses this excellent body of literature because it concerns itself with subjective responses to work, with modes of adaptation to the objectifying features of industrial labor. he rejects industrial sociology, therefore, because it illuminates the very processes which are crucial to the understanding of capitalist control. for it is in the attempt to cope with, to compensate for the inherent deprivation in capitalist work that laborers generate a world of their own which shapes the ideological effects of work, which explains how workers submit to or resist the separation of conception and execution on the one hand and consent to the production of surplus on the other. to dismiss industrial sociology, as braverman does in the name of his critique, is to miss the fact that it not only conceals but also expresses an underlying reality. it is for marxists to appropriate the "rational kernel" of sociology by placing it in a marxist framework. 8 symposium on braverman 3. struggles and competition it is not only that braverman gives short shrift to day to day adaptation but he also allows little room for the types of struggle which shape the movement of capital. instead capital flows from one arena to the next with its own inexorable logic and similarly the separation of conception and execution invades all aspects of social life. resistance is reduced to a mere friction a derivative and ineffectual response which does not affect the direction or pace of change. insofar as braverman does point to a motor of this movement, it is the unilateral power of the capitalist class. this would appear to rest on three assumptions. first, it presumes that the capitalist class identifies its interests as lying in the separation of conception and execution. second, it presumes that the capitalist class or its agents have the power to implement those interests, that is they have the power to enforce the separation of conception and execution against resistance from other classes. third, it presumes that the separation of conception and execution as a mode of "control" is actually in the interest of all or at least some of the fractions of the capitalist class. i find all three assumptions to be problematical. historically, there have been occasions when capitalists have not identified their interests as lying in the separation of conception and execution; they have not always had the power to expropriate skill and there have been times when such expropriation was at odds with their interests, when it created more trouble than it was worth. an alternative approach would be to look upon changes in the labor process as the outcomes of struggles between capital and labor on the one hand and competition among capitalists on the other. it is the particular constellation of struggle and competition that shapes managerial strategies and leads to the introduction of new forms of alternate routes control in the labor process. it is only in this way that we can begin to explain why taylorism or mechanization are introduced in different places at different times. moreover, such changes have had the effect of reorganizing struggle and competition and hence to further changes in the labor process. at the same time one should not make the mistake of regarding the managerial class or managerial group within a single firm as a monolithic entity. it is itself composed of different levels (shop floor, middle and top management) as well as different fractions (departments) which compete with each other with immediate effects on the organization of work. in avoiding the study of changing patterns of competition and struggle braverman has difficulty in developing an adequate notion of the periodization of the capitalist labor process. what he offers is the coincidence of the emergence of monopoly capitalism, taylorism and the scientific-technical revolution. however, it is by no means clear that they all occurred at once. rather it has to be posed as a question for historical research as to when taylorism and mechanization appeared and where and how their timing related to the rise of the large corporation. to do this it is also necessary to have an adequate picture of the labor process prior to the rise of the large corporation, that is the labor process under competitive capitalism. at best braverman presents a false comparison between monopoly capitalism as characterized by the systematic separation of conception and execution and competitive capitalism as the lost paradise of craft autonomy. obviously neither picture is adequate even as an approximation. the transition from competitive to monopoly capitalism refers to the emergence of the "monopoly" sector of the large corporations. what was the nature of the labor process during this transitional phase and to what extent was the labor process itself responsible for the 10 symposium on braverman capital and so on, that offe, habermas, o'connor, man del , castells and others find the sources of various crises. while this is no place to enter into a discussion of their studies, it is important to note that it is in the analysis of the conditions of. existence of capitalism, how it persists, how it is at all possible that braverman offers nothing and thereby gives the impression of the permanence of capitalism. the alternative to braverman's expressive totality is to examine how the different parts of a social formation are functionally interrelated to ensure its continuity over time. moreover, in pursuing such a "reproduction" analysis one can also explore the reproduction of contradictions that are inherent in the social formation. one is led to view parts not merely as expressions of a single dominant principle but, in addition, as possessing a certain coherence and logic of their own. however, just as braverman's critique, as reflected in the expressive totality, is by itself inadequate so the reproduction analysis of the structured totality is equally unsatisfactory in that it disguises itself in some neutral garb without posing the problem and potential of socialism. 5. socialism so what shall we mean by socialism? braverman's notion of socialism stems from his point of critique and therefore involves the reunification of conception and execution. although he vehemently denies it, his critique taken as it is from within capitalism leads in the direction of the resurrection of his lost paradise of the craft worker. perhaps it might have been more useful if braverman had distinguished between the reunification of conception and execution at the individual level job control and at the collective level. the latter notion is more compatible with the idea of society in which history is made consciously through a genuine collective organization 11 alternate routes of production, distribution and consumption. braver-man's somewhat limited vision of socialism is linked to his notion of technology as neutral. it is in connection with the role of forces of production in the development of capitalism and the transition to socialism that braverman rejects critical theory at its most powerful and embraces orthodoxy at its weakest. although there are places which suggest the opposite, he tends to argue that there is nothing inherent in capitalist technology and machines which prevents the realization of socialism. to the contrary, with a few exceptions such as the assembly line, advanced capitalist machines can be harnessed to relations of production under socialism. capitalist relations of production make themselves in the factory not through the imperatives of machine technology but through the organization of relations around machines. this view is at odds with a stream of thought associated with critical theory, that capitalist machines themselves embody capitalist relations of production; they themselves carry with them technical imperatives incompatible with the notion of emancipatory work. thus, for marcuse socialism must inaugurate its own technology and machinery and not import that which is most advanced under capitalism. having said that, then we can no longer assert that the major contradiction and developmental tendency of capitalism rests in the expansion of the forces of production. to the contrary under such view the forces of production rather than undermining the relations of production, reinforce those relations. in marxist literature this is now a common place observation. 6. the specificity of capitalism in the united states labor and monopoly capital is a product of a particular time and place. it reflects the very real power of capital in the united states during the third quarter of the twentieth century. but this domination 12 symposium on braverman of capital is not something to be taken as given but, as i have already suggested, its presuppositions should themselves become the object of study. indeed, the more powerful that domination appears to be, the more important it is to unmask it, to reveal its premises and to place it in its political and economic context. in other words we must examine the specificity of capitalism in the united states its origins, development and reproduction rather than projecting its attributes as the attributes of the capitalist mode of production in general. there are a number of conventional explanations for the distinctive strength of capital in the united states. the supposed absence of a feudal mode of production also meant the absence of what gramsci referred to as viscous sedimentations that might resist capitalist hegemony. the corporate liberal thesis argues for the existence of an enlightened bourgeoisie, constituted during the progressive era, which cemented the dominant classes and organized the incorporation of the working classes. other theories focus on the open frontier or the successive waves of immigrants that divided the working class into antagonistic ethnic and racial segments thus facilitating the domination of capital. here i want to suggest an alternative approach which might be of more use in understanding the specificity of the labor process in the united states. the critical factor, i would suggest, in shaping the development of the labor process in different capitalist social formations is the relative timing of unionization and mechanization. in contrast to the united states, where mechanization preceded large scale unionization, in britain mechanization could only proceed in the face of powerful resistance presented by an already organized working class. indeed, to this day workers on the shop floor are more militant and exercise a greater control over the labor process than 13 alternate routes their counterparts in the united states who never built a strong trade union movement to resist mechanization. in exploring the relative timing of unionization and mechanization one is examining the specific constellation of competition and struggle as it shapes the development of the labor process. in this way one can begin to explain variations in the labor process over time both within and between different countries. rather than attributing variations to positions on a continuum of becoming or to some spiritual lag we explore the very real political and economic forces that determine variations in the labor process and in this way gain a sense of the limits of the possible and the conditions for the transcendence of capitalism. 14 | 121 the ottawa and gatineau museum workers’ strike: precarious employmentand the public sector squeeze carlo fanelli and priscillia lefebvre1 nearly five years removed from what would later come to be known as the great recession, a large amount of critical writing has sought to show how a private sector-led economic crisis has been thoroughly displaced into the public sphere (mcnally, 2011; mcbride and whiteside, 2011; panitch et al ., 2010; fanelli et al ., 2010). having taken on private capital’s debts, supplied new subsidies and undertaken a stimulus program in order to offset the recession, the economic downturn has been redefined as one originating in overgenerous social services, an inefficient government bureaucracy, unions and just about any user or producer of public services. paradoxically, but perfectly logical in capitalist terms, the banks, corporations and capitalist classes that caused the crisis are now demanding austerity. as david camfield (2011, p. 96) has recently written: “there is evidence that governments and other public sector employees are beginning to conduct an intensified offensive against public sector unions. this offensive will likely feature not only freezes for wage and benefit costs but also other concessionary demands and job cuts, along with new efforts to restructure the public sector.” in line with camfield’s contention, in this paper we seek to add to the growing body of literature examining the changing nature and content of government political economic intervention, social welfare provision, growing attacks against labour unionism and general restructuring of the federal public service. 1  carlo fanelli is a ph.d. candidate at the department of sociology & anthropology, carleton university, with interests in critical political economy, labour studies, canadian public policy, social movements, urban sociology and education. carlo serves as editor of alternate routes: a journal of critical social research, and recently co-edited capitalism & confrontation: critical perspectives . priscillia lefebvre is a collaborative ph.d. student at the department of sociology and anthropology/institute of political economy, carleton university. the ottawa and gatineau museum workers’ strike: precarious employmentand the public sector squeeze 122 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times we overview the transition from keynesian to neoliberal public policy prescriptions, with a focus on precarious work and shifting labour market conditions. our research is empirically grounded in an analysis of striking museum workers in the ottawa and gatineau region. as will be shown, the public service alliance of canada (psac) local 70396’s efforts in achieving job security and fair wages for its members offer valuable insights from which to learn in the continued struggles against precarious work and neoliberal public policy. the psac strike illustrates how increasing trends in non-standard, temporary, and contract work are making inroads into the public sphere. we conclude with some cursory projections as to the hardening relationship between employers and employees, particularly those unionized and in the federal public service, followed by some general observations on the in/adequacy of union responses. canada’s keynesian compromise as the political economic malaise and social devastation wrought by the great depression and wwii came to an end, decades of strife had transformed the class dynamics of canadian society. describing the depression years of the 1930s, an excerpt from pierre burton’s (2001, p. 9) study of the period is quite informative: “nobody could tell exactly when it began and nobody could predict when it would end. at the outset they didn’t even call it a depression. at worst it was a recession, a brief slump, a “correction” in the market, a glitch in the rising curve of prosperity. only when the full import of those heartbreaking years sank in did it become the great depression.” as rampant financial speculation, plunging primary resources extraction and industrial production coalesced in the turmoil of the 1930s, nearly one-third of canadians were out of work and half the population had become reliant on some form of social relief. as berton (2001, p. 10) noted, “balancing the budget was more important than feeding the hungry. the bogey of deficit was enlisted to tighten the purse strings,” while “[t]he bondholders enjoyed a free ride on the backs of the people.” unfortunately, it was only with canada’s entrance into wwii that the canadian economy began to see some so-called recovery. with social turmoil mounting, the canadian state began introducing and expanding welfare provisions assuming a greater responsibility for social reproduction (mckeen and porter, 2003). indeed, the following years were an intense period of labour-capital disputes, marred by ideological, political and philosophical contestation. panitch and swartz (2003) suggest that due to swelling union membership and mass political | 123 mobilization, the 1940s represented an unparalleled shift in the balance of class forces. commonly referred to as the ‘keynesian compromise’, harvey (2005, p. 10) describes the period thus: “states actively intervened in industrial policy and moved to set standards for the social wage by constructing a variety of welfare systems (health care, education and the like)...[m]arket processes and entrepreneurial and corporate activities were surrounded by a web of social and political constraints and a regulatory environment that sometimes restrained but in other instances led the way in economic and industrial strategy. state-led planning and in some instances ownership of key sectors (coal, steel, automobiles) were not uncommon” (harvey, 2005, p. 10). this social pact formed the basis from which the canadian state enlarged and developed its active and interventionist provision of social services, while laying the groundwork for rising real wages and improved working conditions. symbolic of the newfound ‘compromise’ was privy council order 1003 which ‘recognized the rights of private sector workers across canada to organize, bargain collectively and strike... and backed these rights with sanctions against employers who refused’ (panitch and swartz, 2003, p. 3). canada’s experiment with keynesian demand-side macroeconomic policy was guided by certain key commitments: full employment; active fiscal and monetary policy; public works projects (e.g. roads, bridges, general infrastructure); progressive taxation (particularly income and corporate); universal social programs; some degree of capital controls and a commitment to domestic reinvestment (mcbride, 1997; evans and shields, 1998; burke et al ., 2000). as canadian governments and their provincial counterparts implemented–to varying degrees–the aforementioned policies, two federal programs were central to the development of canada’s welfare state: unemployment insurance (1940) and family allowances (1944). this was followed over the next two decades with the expansion of pension and health care coverage, for example, as well as the introduction and extension of federal-provincial cost-sharing arrangements and direct income transfers to individuals. in the quarter-century following the second world war, growing militancy on the part of labour unions, anti-racist and women’s’ movements radically revamped the contours of work, labour market conditions and social reproduction. what has come to be known as the standard employment relationship (ser) became the normative “white the ottawa and gatineau museum workers’ strike: precarious employmentand the public sector squeeze 124 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times male breadwinner/family wage” model upon which legislation, labour laws, public policy and union organizing strategies were based (vosko, 2006, 2007; pupo, 1997. the ser refers to a work arrangement based on a single employer, full-time, year-round employment, often under direct supervision with benefits and expectations of indefinite employment. throughout this period, inequities along the lines of race, gender, sexuality and ethnicity marred the shifting landscapes of work, with many of those deviating from the white male breadwinner model excluded from the ser (teelucksingh and galabuzi, 2005; bezanson and luxton, 2006; das gupta, 1996). as the 1960s progressed, most federal and provincial employees were finally granted the right to strike with the passage of the public service staff relations act, something most private sector workers obtained more than a decade earlier (panitch and swartz, 2003). however, just as many gained these rights, economic recession would once again put many workers, working conditions and general labour market security under duress. after three decades of uneven, though gradual improvement in the provision of social entitlements and working conditions, growing regional uncertainty and international economic turmoil would come to radically halt the expansion of canada’s social programs and public goods and works investments. as inflation and unemployment mounted, postwar keynesianism began to unravel in the 1970s “re-exposing all that had been learned about market failures and monopoly provision a century ago” (albo, 2009, p. 5). neoliberalism with canadian characteristics the 1970s would witness a significant transformation in the form and function of public policy, labour relations and social services. as the making of global capitalism stumbled amid the deep recession of the 1970s, collective efforts on the part of the capitalist classes would seek to refashion the institutional configurations and social provisions of the previous thirty years. neoliberalism emerged in this context as a means to discipline the growing power of labour militancy and return to capitalist profitability. as three decades of unprecedented economic growth came to a standstill, social expenditures increasingly came under attack as unaffordable. the 1970s saw rising unemployment and inflation, increased foreign competition, the doubling of international oil costs and rising resource prices (mcbride, 1992; carroll and shaw, 2001). contending that the keynesian welfare state cultivated dependency on the government for social security and interfered with the so-called natural machinations of the free market, | 125 emerging neoliberal models reoriented public policy toward fiscal restraint, the cultivation of a competitive business climate, enhanced capital mobility and individual responsibility. the state’s role came to be seen as ensuring the institutional preconditions for free trade, private property and “flexible” labour market conditions. neoliberal work arrangements sought to intensify the profit motive with the use of shift work, short-term contracts, workplace speed-ups, evening and overnight work, part-time labour, weekend work, rotating and split shifts, variable schedules, as well as casual and seasonal employment (shalla and clement, 2007; pupo and thomas, 2010). it was at this point, roughly in the mid-1970s, where the ser began to crumble. in its place has arisen what some have identified as atypical, non-standard, contingent and casualized forms of work, but which we prefer to characterize as “precarious” (vosko, 2006, 2007; pupo and thomas, 2010; braedley and luxton, 2006; camfield, 2011). four key indicators are often taken as measures of precarity: the degree of certainty in employment; control over the labour process (linked to the absence or presence of trade unions); the degree of regulatory protection through union representation or law (e.g. against unfair dismissal, discrimination); and income level (as even ‘secure’ jobs can be low-paying) (rogers and rogers, 1989). however, not all contract or part-time work is precarious: “sometimes it is progressive, sometimes regressive, and it can be both precarious and permanent” (clement et al., 2010, 57). as such, the concept of precarious employment remains a multidimensional and heterogeneous concept (vosko, 2006). in an effort to reduce production costs and maximize profitability, many employers have adopted a neoliberal approach to employment, which is achieved through unionbusting, the temporary and discretional use of employment, layoffs, labour intensification, the denial of benefits and retrenchment of wages. the results of which have brought median real wages to a near stand-still for more than three decades amid the growing discrepancy between the intensification of worker productivity and the compensation that follows (clement, 2007). for instance, it is estimated that real median wages in canada peaked in 1982, while productivity grew more than 35 percent between 1981-2008 (gonick, 2009; iow, 2009). businesses now openly regard workers as disposable commodities. for example, take a senior manager at at&t: “in at&t, we have to promote the whole concept of the workforce being contingent, though most of our workers are inside our walls. “jobs” are being replaced by “projects” and “fields of work” are giving rise to a society that is increasingly “jobless but not workless.”... the ottawa and gatineau museum workers’ strike: precarious employmentand the public sector squeeze 126 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times people need to look at themselves as self-employed, as vendors who come to this company to sell their skills” (cited in perelman, 2011, p. 31). as such, central to the new reality of work in the twenty-first century are insecure labour arrangements, low-pay, the absence of benefits or entitlements, and growing work-life incongruities. in this regard, central to canadian neoliberalism was a deepening integration with american economic policy; the de/ re-regulation of foreign direct investment, including a steadfast emphasis on free trade agreements, particularly with the u.s. and later latin america; corporate and personal income tax reductions; new subsidies to capital in the form of loans, grants and tax exemptions; increases in consumption taxes; public sector reform through new public management strategies; the replacement of welfare with workfare; and the movement away from universal social programs toward market-based models (broad and hunter, 2010; mcbride, 2001; evans and shields, 1998; workman, 2009; burke et al., 2000; mckeen and porter, 2003). this was joined by an increasingly authoritative turn by corresponding canadian governments, notably the liberal government of trudeau (1968-79, 1980-84) and conservative government of mulroney (1984-1993), which sought to dismantle the regulatory gains and protections afforded by keynesian-era social protections. both the trudeau and mulroney governments intensified neoliberal policy prescriptions by serving injunctions on unions, jailing prominent union leaders (notably the federal government’s showdown with the canadian union of postal workers and public service alliance of canada), freezing wages for federal workers, the increasing designation of unionized workers as “essential”, and the growing use of backto-work legislation, while laying off workers under the auspices of fiscal responsibility. for some commentators this signaled a return to a more open reliance of the state and capital on coercion to secure the subordination of labour, including the consolidation of a state of “permanent exceptionalism” (panitch and swartz, 2003, p. 25). but it was in the 1990s with the election of the chretien liberals, who “adopted the neoliberal fiscal agenda much more vigorously than mulroney” (mcbride, 2001, p. 99), that the most sustained welfare state restructuring took place. mcbride (2001) has come to describe this period, particularly the 1995 federal budget, as one when erosion ended and demolition began. the primacy of deficit reduction over social welfare coupled with inflation-targeting over full-employment, characterized this period as expenditure restraint and supply-side arguments dominated the political economic arena. a wave of privatization measures | 127 also swept over the federal and provincial landscapes as the most lucrative crown corporations were dismantled and sold off piecemeal. social services also became increasingly subject to public-private-partnership (p3) delivery models, as in health care and education (armstrong et al., 2001; fisher et al., 2006; loxley and loxley, 2010). the notion that unemployment was more a result of individual failure as opposed to market failure came to dominate public policy debates, as the principle of private responsibility over collective responsibility transformed the parameters of the welfare state. neoliberal policies also reproduced and intensified patterns of racialized and gendered labour market segmentation and inequality by ignoring socio-historical structural relations and transformations in the breadth and depth of protective regulations. for instance, as social services became ever-more market-dependant, the burden increasingly fell on historically racialized groups, women and immigrants to occupy the most precarious labour market positions (braedley and luxton, 2010; teelucksingh and galabuzi, 2005; arat-koc, 1997; bakan and stasiulus, 1997). by the mid-2000s, the neoliberal project had thoroughly remodeled the canadian welfare state. the election of conservative prime minister stephen harper in 2006 is perhaps the most comprehensive attempt to embed a particularly aggressive form of neoliberal market dogma. since his election in 2006, prime minister harper has methodically worked to entrench a market-led revamping of the federal public service. this includes: cutting federal social services programs, especially those that would fall under the auspices of the provinces; freezing federal wages; cutting the federal goods and services tax (gst) from seven to five percent; mandating provinces to consider the p3 route in order to receive federal grants; increasing defense spending by nearly 40 percent; allocating $9 billion to build new ‘super jails’; easing environmental regulations in the arctic for oil and mining companies; fast tracking development project’s in the alberta tar sands; weakening canada’s internationally admired long-form census; defunding equity seeking groups; intensifying free trade talks with the european union; and leading the largest militarization, and subsequent mass arrests, in canadian history at the june 2010 g20 summit in toronto (evans and albo, 2010; fanelli and hurl, 2010; hussey and leclerc, 2011; mcbride and whiteside, 2011). despite being found in contempt of parliament, stephen harper has been clear about his intensions “to make conservatism the natural government philosophy of the country” (whittington, 2011). moreover, although already one of the most tax-friendly regimes for corporations the ottawa and gatineau museum workers’ strike: precarious employmentand the public sector squeeze 128 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times in the world, harper’s conservatives will provide over $10 billion in corporate welfare for 2011-12. while corporate tax rates were 30 percent in 2000, they had fallen to 21 percent in 2004, 19.5 percent in 2008, 16.5 percent in 2011 and 15 percent by 2012 (ibid). in just twelve years corporate tax rates will have been cut exactly in half, with prime minister harper’s conservatives overseeing the bulk of corporate subsidies and the undermining of federal revenue streams. altogether, tax cuts enacted by the conservatives since 2006 will result in $220 billion in foregone revenue by 2013-14; that’s money that could have gone toward expanding and improving health care and education, pension plans, early learning and child care programs, tackling poverty and fighting climate change. such changes in the nature and content of public policy have had significant implications for the transformation of labour market conditions with some important differences in the public and private sectors. as stinson (2010, 94) has argued: “the key difference is that casualization in the public sector has taken place primarily through the growth of temporary full-time employment between 1997-2007, whereas in the private sector the growth in casualization has been mainly in temporary parttime work. over this period, temporary full-time work has squeezed out permanent part-time employment as the main form of casualized labour in the public sector.” given significant structural forms of discrimination, such as those historically linked to the female gender wage gap and racialized exclusions, transformations in the quality and form of work and working conditions remains important given that nearly one in four canadians, 61 percent of which are women, work in the public sphere. moreover, these transformations will also have grave implications for the strength and vitality of canada’s highly unionized public sector (75 percent), and its relationship to the shrinking union density of the private sector (19 percent) (ibid). recent scholarship regarding the growing spread of precarious work is also revealing new insights. lewchuck et al . (2011) propose that we may be in the early stages of a major shift in the interrelationship between production and social reproduction in the last century. their data suggests that men and women’s employment experiences are becoming increasingly similar, due in part to the downward convergence of wages and working conditions –i.e. those historically associated with “feminized labour”– characterized by dual precarious earner households. as they argue (lewchuck et al ., 2011, p. 94), “white male workers can no longer assume that secure labour market positions are theirs, while new opportunities for hidden forms of both gender and racial privileging/discrimination have merged in the less secure segments of the labour market, in the pay | 129 differences, constant scheduling, and rehiring/firing of temporary and contingent work.” on the whole, then, while in the preceding keynesian period the public sector often set the general standards for working conditions and wages, due in good part to unionization, under neoliberalism the weakened private sector has become the benchmark, often at the detriment of public sector workers today. as our analysis of the 2009 strike by museum workers in psac local 70396 illustrates, their struggle over decent working conditions and fair wages may be a sign of things to come as neoliberal public policy seeks to undermine free collective bargaining in a renewed age of austerity. preparing for a strike: background and context after seven months of negotiations without a contract, on september 21, 2009, 375 public service alliance of canada (psac) members with local 70396 took job action against the canadian museum of civilization corporation (cmcc), which operates both the canadian museum of civilization (cmc) and canadian museum of war (cmw). 2 psac local 70396 is separated into two main groups: (1) the floor staff, public hosts, tour guides, client services and animators, (2) and about one-third work in administration, collections and exhibition (psac, 2009a). the union is composed of approximately 60 percent women, with 5 percent from historically racialized groups, 2 percent from first nation communities, and 6 percent persons with disabilities. at the time of the strike there were only 6 permanent tour guides at both museums, while 49 positions remained temporary and part-time. with 92 percent of the voting membership choosing to exercise their right to strike, members took to the picket lines over job security, wages and contracting-out. as one of the striking workers stated, “this is a frightening time in which people who have full-time, permanent status still feel they could be laid off or replaced by a private firm at any time. it’s incredibly difficult on the psyche” (personal communication, 2009). using the recession as an excuse to freeze wages and contractout employees, the strike pitted the crown corporation against psac workers striking in the bordering cities–one in ontario and the other in 2  since its beginning in 1966, psac has grown into one of the largest labour unions in canada representing over 172,000 canadian workers, many from the federal public sector. with representation in the private sector also growing, the majority of psac members remain federal government workers in agencies such as postal communications, agriculture, customs and immigration, national defense, and heritage canada. psac also represents workers in the broader public sector including teaching and lab assistants in universities, casino workers, and employees in women’s shelters. the ottawa and gatineau museum workers’ strike: precarious employmentand the public sector squeeze 130 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times quebec–of ottawa and gatineau. central to the strike was the crown’s efforts to increase the use of contractual and temporary work, which already accounted for nearly 38 percent of the workforce. as part of maintaining this level of casual employment, the cmcc regularly terminated temporary positions days before they would reach the level at which they would become eligible for a permanent position as then stated by the collective agreement. after enforcing a three-week waiting period, the employer would unashamedly offer the former employee a new contract. the newly re-hired worker was then forced to start from the bottom of the pay scale without any seniority. where lay-offs and promotions were concerned, management possessed the power to terminate temporary contracts at their discretion thus making it impossible for casual workers to become permanent employees and union members. one such termination involved an employee who had twenty years of employment experience with the cmcc. examples are abound of workers with nearly two decades of experience still considered temporary by the corporation, and could therefore be let-go at any time. likewise, an important element of the strike was significant pay differences among workers. it was not uncommon for employees in similar positions to make anywhere from twenty to forty percent less than their colleagues working at other crown museums, despite similar levels of training, education and experience. for example, at the time of the strike a host working at the museum of war was paid an hourly wage of $13, while one at the museum of nature was paid $24 per hour, despite near equal levels of experience, training and education. similarly, in an effort to avoid providing benefits to its employees, the cmcc sought to extend benefit eligibility requirements for sick leave and vacation pay from a six month probationary period to twelve. in fighting to end the unfair treatment and casualization of labour at the museums, job security, control over the labour process and wages on par with other workers at cmcc museums was a sticking point throughout negotiations (ibid). on strike throughout the first four weeks of the strike few discussions were held between psac local 70396 and the cmcc bargaining committee. aware of the impasse, then-minister of labour rona ambrose offered to send the labour dispute to binding arbitration; however, while local 70396 was open to the idea, the cmcc refused, perhaps fearful that an arbitrator would rule in the union’s favour given precedent at other cmcc museums. seeking to avoid arbitration, and after nine weeks | 131 of refusing to meet with psac members unless their demands for job security and the end of casualization were taken off the table, the corporation finally agreed to meet with the union on november 20, 2009. however, bargaining failed to provide any concrete movement as censorship and intimidation became the preferred approach of the cmcc. for instance, psac was presented with a letter from cmcc’s legal counsel threatening that immediate action would be taken if so-called defamatory comments and photos were not deleted from a facebook page set up to provide strike support entitled “fairness and justice for museum workers.” psac responded by saying that they were not of the opinion that the material on this page was offensive or inaccurate and in turn accused the corporation of attempting to suppress the voice of the workers who were exposing the unfair work practices and experiences they had endured. maria fitzpatrick, the regional executive vice-president for the national capital region, described this attempt at censorship as “acts of desperation” and went on the say at the time that “we are appalled that a crown corporation is spending taxpayers’ money to attempt to intimidate workers into silence, rather than getting back to the bargaining table to negotiate a fair settlement” (blatt, 2009).3 nevertheless, the cmcc’s bargaining committee refused to address issues related to workplace insecurity, staffing procedure and wage disparities, using the rationale that the public service needed to be “flexible” like their private sector counterparts. private security surveillance was subcontracted by the cmcc to constantly videotape the strikers, at times from only a few feet away. also, records of employment were sent to the homes of those on strike without explanation as part of a rather bold intimidation strategy. psac did not take kindly to such tactics and indicated that their lawyers would be demanding an explanation for this offense. this proved to be the first time an employer has ever sent such documents to the homes of striking employees in the forty four years of the union’s existence. in 3  psac also presented the cmcc with a letter of their own referring to a web publication entitled “union activities counterproductive to negotiations.” in an attempt to sway public support away from the strikers, the cmcc document stated: “the public service alliance of canada and some of the strikers have taken their labour dispute from the work site to the private residences of employees of the canadian museum of civilization corporation. these employees, their spouses and children were frightened, and felt intimidated and harassed by these questionable tactics. we believe that the majority of striking staff and canadian citizens would find such activities reprehensible and not conducive to a timely resolution of the current labour dispute”. the “reprehensible” activity in question was a pancake breakfast, which psac describes as “in no way intimidating, frightening, harassing or otherwise improper or questionable.” if the corporation refused to remove the document psac was ready to pursue legal action for damages and sue for defamation on grounds of its own. the ottawa and gatineau museum workers’ strike: precarious employmentand the public sector squeeze 132 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times response, psac reassured its members that there was no legal cause for the sending out of such documents and advised them to ignore the records of employment. at the time, psac (psac, 2009b) reminded management that “section 94 of the canada labour code clearly states that no employer may terminate, layoff, discipline, transfer, suspend, intimidate, threaten or otherwise discriminate against an employee for participating in a legal strike” and threatening to do so would result in charges of unfair labour practices. yet, despite the corporation’s attempts to scare workers into concessions and forcefully impose upon them a state of permanent precarity, striking psac workers held the line. strong bonds were formed while picketing and a newfound sense of courage amongst workers left them anxious for talks to resume. throughout, strikers stressed that the dispute was not with the public, but with the cmcc. unlike the resentful memory of the ottawa public transit strike over late 2008 and early 2009, including bitter civic workers’ strikes in nearby windsor and toronto (fanelli and paulson, 2010; noonen, 2009), striking museum workers in gatineau and ottawa continued to gain public support as the strike went on. walking a picket line for weeks with no obvious end in sight can be extremely demoralizing. as anyone who has ever been on strike or been effected by a strike can attest, the financial and personal/familial strains this puts on picketers can easily fracture a common front. one useful way museum workers fought this was by putting together regular cultural events that normally would have taken place inside the museum, but holding them outside on the picket line instead. these events were open to the public and provided the workers with an opportunity to organize and work together on the picket line in a fulfilling way. the successful execution of these events, such as one honouring veterans on remembrance day (cbc news, 2009a) and picket line tea parties held in celebration of prince charles’ visit to canada (psac, 2009c) contributed in a substantial way to workers’ ability to maintain their spirits throughout the strike. the events also demonstrated to the public an effort on the part of workers to make the best out of a difficult situation while informing them of their issues. this was especially evident when the museum of civilization opened the “afghanistan: hidden treasures” exhibit and workers on the picket line created their own exhibit featuring 200 photographs of museum workers engaged in strike action entitled “striking treasures.” to quote a striking employee who worked on this project, “the purpose was to show people the real treasures of the museum… unfortunately on the sidewalk” (cbc news, 2009b). | 133 holding events such as these on the picket line made workers extremely visible to the community and showcased the skills of the striking workers and their work as valuable contributors to the community. it encouraged dialogue between the picketers and the public, providing an opportunity for workers to express their legitimate concerns and reasons for being on strike, as well as garnered positive media attention and political support. picketers were also visited by fellow artists and musicians as every bit of encouragement counted. this included the support of politicians marcel proulx (member of parliament hullaylmer, liberal party) and paul dewar (member of parliament ottawacentre, ndp), public supporters and other prominent figures such as barry blake (national councilor for the alliance of canadian cinema, television and radio artists) and douglas cardinal (architect of the cmc), which provided the workers with positive reinforcement and confidence (psac, 2009d). other unions and labour affiliates also came forward in support of psac local 70396, such as the professional institute of public service and the canadian union of public employees. at the same time, the canadian labour congress (clc) met in ottawa and agreed that the cmcc “has blatantly abandoned their responsibility by failing to negotiate a fair collective agreement” (clc, 2009). the clc also asked the canadian government, then a harper minority, for a public showing of support for the employees in their struggle by applying pressure to the cmcc, and in particular its chief executive officer victor rabinovitch, to begin a new round of talks that would put an end to the strike. cognizant that back-to-work legislation would not make it passed a conservative minority government, the harper government did not intervene. outcome negotiations with the cmcc finally resumed on december 11, 2009, but it took a meeting between victor rabinovitch, then psac president john gordon, the deputy minister of labour canada, and a senior official of the federal mediation and conciliation service to make it happen. to sum a long and bitter labour dispute, in the end some important improvements to the working conditions of psac local 70396 employees were won. four improvements were central: first, the cmcc agreed to provide full-time temporary workers with the opportunity of permanent status; second, internal applicants were granted preference to available jobs, providing they possess the necessary skills and experience; third, new language was introduced in the collective agreement that guaranthe ottawa and gatineau museum workers’ strike: precarious employmentand the public sector squeeze 134 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times tees no existing temporary position will be involuntarily eliminated as a result of the contracting out of the same position; and fourth, improvements in maternal and parental leave benefits were gained, which are now on par with the quebec insurance plan (emploi et solidarité sociale québec, 2011).4 also, gained in negotiations were salary protections for those who are reassigned to different positions. as a step toward recognizing seniority among casual employees, the cmcc offered seven newly created permanent part-time positions filled internally based on experience and years of service. after 86 days on strike, on december 15 2009, psac local 70396 workers voted to accept the tentative agreement reached with the cmcc (psac, 2009e). of course, there are other aspects of the strike that were not quite as successful. for instance, workers with psac local 70396 were unsuccessful in their quest for wage parity with museum workers at other crown corporations, such as the museum of nature. likewise, after nearly three months on strike, relations with management remained obviously strained, as do tensions between non-union and union members who crossed the picket lines. rather than resorting to unjust terminations, the cmcc now uses attrition as a way of reducing staff numbers, while in the event of layoffs employees are offered a severance package that both the employee and the union local must approve. the above aside, however, reflecting on the strike’s relative success, one striking worker mused that building solidarity among the rank-andfile of the two museums and the bargaining executive played a major role in psac’s optimism over the long haul (personal communication, 2009). tensions among the classic divide between francophone and anglophone workers were few, if any, perhaps due to the recognition that they were–as one striker remarked–“in this together.” all union communications were issued in french and english, ensuring the free flow of necessary information. regular updates were communicated to the membership by the negotiating team and the demands of the workers were presented in a clear and consistent way. feelings of camaraderie were fostered within the union throughout the negotiating process. also, important to striking workers was support from other psac locals and unions. indeed, some workers attributed the overwhelming refusal of the cmcc’s “final offer” by the membership to their new4  the quebec parental insurance plan is perhaps the strongest in the country providing paid leave for wage-earning birth or adoptive parents. benefits can be shared by parents or taken separately as maternal/paternal leave and include a 55-70% income replacement for a maximum of 18 to 37 weeks depending on the chosen option. see: http://www.rqap.gouv. qc.ca/travailleur_salarie/choix_en.asp | 135 found politicization and solidarity. in interviews conducted during and after the strike, they suggested that their resounding “no” sent a clear message to the corporation that “workers remained fiercely united, were not prepared to back down, and were to be taken seriously” (psac, 2009f; psac, 2009g). a sign of things to come even though the strike ended in what may be considered a relatively small victory with gains in the protection of employees against contracting-out and improvements to parental leave, the spectre of increased private sector penetration into the cmcc looms large. for instance, shortly after the strike the cmcc’s ceo victor rabinovitch stated that he intended to focus his energies on “attracting private sector support to supplement government funding” (cmcc, 2009). as disconcerting as such comments are, the psac local 70396 strike over the winter of 2009 is one small success in what may, unfortunately, be an increasingly aggressive federal conservative, now majority, government. workers at the national gallery of canada and museum of civilization are once again being threatened with continued cuts to heritage institutions. without a contract since june 2010, the gallery’s management has announced plans to trim its budgets by privatizing its book store and terminating nine employees. commenting on the situation, local 70397 president david bosschaart said: “we just want a fair contract that provides service pay, improved job security and some protection against inflation” (psac, 2011). since gaining a majority in the house of commons, the conservatives have been unhesitant in their quest to remake the public sector in the image of the private sector. for instance, over the next three years 6000 full-time jobs in the public service are set to be cut. national vice-president of psac, patty ducharme, commenting on the cuts, said: “they are chipping away at services they consider have no value. arts, culture, heritage, language [and the] environment…” (cobb, 2011). likewise, in an effort to further shrink public sector employment, workers are being offered buyout packages, the option of taking early retirement and, ultimately, layoffs should attrition fail to produce the desired results. indicative of this trend, from 1990 to 2009, as a percentage of the total labour force government employment experienced a decline from 21 percent to 18 percent (mcbride and whiteside, 2011). in addition to making the public sector market-dependent, the federal conservatives are flexing their majority power with the growing use of back-to-work legislation. the ottawa and gatineau museum workers’ strike: precarious employmentand the public sector squeeze 136 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times after seven months of negotiations without a contract, on june 2, 2011, nearly 50,000 workers at the canada post corporation (cpc) took job action against employer efforts intent on downgrading their wages, benefits and working conditions.5 rather than launching an allout strike, the canadian union of postal workers (cupw) decided on rotating job action, while continuing to deliver pension and social assistance cheques. canada post’s intentions were unambiguous: introduce new machinery and workplace reorganization in an effort to intensify productivity; increase the volume of mail carried by each letter carrier; cut well-paying, full-time positions; introduce more evening and overnight shift work; replace sick leave rights with an inferior short term disability plan; and, most contentiously, introduce a lower pay scale and replace the defined benefit pension plan with the unstable fluctuations of a market-dependent defined contribution plan. after twelve days of rotating job action, however, on june 14, 2011, the cpc locked out the workers. just one-day later labour minister lisa raitt tabled back-towork legislation imposing a wage scale that was lower than the cpc’s last offer (ctv news, 2011). but, as david camfield (2011b) has written, that wasn’t the worst part: “the law dictates that the new collective agreement for urban postal workers will be determined by an arbitrator appointed unilaterally by the minister of labour, using a method called final offer selection (fos). fos is uncommon in canada, and is very rare in back to work legislation. in this case, the union and the employer are each required to submit a final offer covering the many disputed issues. the arbitrator will then select one offer or the other in its entirety. in addition to allowing the conservatives to handpick whoever they want as the arbitrator, the law includes guidelines that the arbitrator must follow in choosing a settlement...this puts intense pressure on cupw officials to submit a final offer that includes concessions they would never have agreed to in bargaining, in the hope that the arbitrator will pick their offer rather than an even-worse one from the employer.” like canada post workers, on june 14, 2011, 3,800 call-centre staff and check-in workers unionized with the canadian automobile workers (caw) at air canada took job action against employer efforts to reduce 5  the impending commentary on the 2011 air canada strike and canada post lockout were written just as the strikes were coming to an end and are therefore cursory at best. | 137 wages, benefits and the quality of working conditions. central to the job action was air canada’s efforts to implement a two-tiered wage system, increase the minimum retirement age by five years and, like the cpc, impose a defined contribution pension plan over the much more secure defined benefit plan. a private company, unlike the cpc, it must be recalled that for the majority of air canada’s rank and file workers, wages had been cut and frozen in 2003 amidst bankruptcy proceedings. this has not, of course, stopped executive compensation from rising excessively. in 2010, for example, air canada’s ceo pay increased forty percent for a total compensation worth $4.5 million. nevertheless, just two hours into the strike labour minister lisa raitt, vowing not to put at risk “canada’s fragile economic recovery,” motioned that she would be tabling back-to-work legislation (kane, 2011). with the threat of backto-work legislation looming large, air canada and the caw were able to reach an agreement soon after the minster of labour tabled legislation forcing striker’s back-to-work. details of the agreement are few at the time of writing, but the contract includes a nine percent wage increase over four years, while the contentious issue of pensions will be dealt with through arbitration (murphy and godfrey, 2011). the newfound aggressiveness of the harper conservatives in employing coercive back-to-work legislation signals what is likely a disturbing precedent for future collective bargaining. the question moving forward, then, is whether or not unions, social justice and community activists can match the aggressiveness and organization of their counterparts? toward a militant, class unionism writing in an era much different than the twenty-first century, though in many ways similar, it is worthwhile recalling the words of one of the u.s.’s most celebrated labour activists who reminds us that “...the struggle in which we are engaged today is a class struggle; and labour unionism to be of any real value to the working class must be organized, not along craft lines, but along class lines” (debs, 1905, n.p.). current labour struggles under the new conservative majority of prime minister harper are about more than workers’ rights to job security, health and safety, benefits and pensions; it is also about defending public services, democratic control over resources and decision-making power, and the rights of all persons to chart out a future without the ever-present fear that capital will at any moment abandon them. in short, it is about recognizing the tory attacks as acts of class war. like debs, marx and engels recognized long ago that improvements the ottawa and gatineau museum workers’ strike: precarious employmentand the public sector squeeze 138 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times in working conditions for those organized also helped raise the basic legislative floor for others. but they also recognized that the benefits accrued through unionization and legislation would always be under attack and likely provisional. consequently, they stressed that “the unions must convince the world at large that their efforts, far from being narrow and selfish, aim at the emancipation of the downtrodden millions” (marx, 1866, n.p). if unions were to become a substantive force of movement–rather than reactionary, even if defensive, opportunists–this meant building unions as expressions of working class unity. all in all, for marx and engels, as for debs, if organized labour was going to have a progressive future it would need to be anchored in a politics that oriented its struggles toward the emancipation of the working class as a whole and, therewith, the abolition of class privileges. this ineradicably meant challenging the very existence and legitimacy of capitalism. while striking psac workers in local 70396 were certainly not, on the whole, anti-capitalist in their aims and efforts, important seeds were revealed in the strike toward a turn to class-struggle unionism. this included, as we outlined above, generalizing their specific qualms into broader social issues, connecting with the general public, seeking to break down the arbitrary distinction between public and private sector workers, challenging the division of labour within the employment structure, communicating with their members and the public in a clear and consistent manner, and confronting management prerogatives. as workers learned and struggled together confidence and optimism became contagious among members. indeed, while the ottawa and gatineau museum workers’ strike may be one, albeit relatively small but successful trade union struggle, it is becoming ever-more apparent that trade unions must go beyond their role as mediators between workers and management. this requires, in our view, transforming trade unionism into class-struggle unionism.6 as likewise argued by panitch and swartz (2003, 237), “union activists and leaders would need to engage directly–not just as surrogates who issue statements to support the vital issues taken up today by social movements–in many spheres of working people’s lives, from education and housing to racism and sexism, and the nature of the work they do… unions need to open themselves up to the broader community to become centres of workingclass life and ultimately vehicles through which working people develop 6  there is valuable research examining the importance of union renewal. however, just what such changes are required is a matter of continuing discussion. while we do not have the space to provide an exhaustive literature review, for strong starting points see kumar and schenk, 2006; ross, 2008; and camfield, 2011c. | 139 the capacity and confidence to lead society.” furthermore, a call to a more inclusive working class resistance model brings attention to the “false logic of competitiveness” of neoliberal capitalism as the collective fight takes place at the community level, which requires the cooperation of those who live and work in shared spaces (radice, 2010, p. 39). for this strategy to be effective, cooperative efforts must be made between unions representing working people as well as renewed union outreach to people without jobs and non-unionized labour with the goal of building class consciousness. to do so requires that unions step beyond formal membership and offer support to the broader community of working class people including the unemployed, non-unionized, migrant labour, the disabled and the poor. considering the brashness of prime minister harper’s newfound conservative majority, and the coordinated responses of the capitalist class, it is conceivable that the worst for federal public service workers (and the users of those services) is yet to come. as psac local 70396 members showed, fighting back matters. conclusion to conclude, in this paper we have sought to trace the trajectory of neoliberalism in canada, with a focus on precarious labour and public services through an analysis of the ottawa and gatineau museum workers’ strike over late 2009. we situated in historical perspective the coercive mechanisms employed by consecutive federal governments’ since the 1980s, drawing attention to the most recent maneuverings by the current government of stephen harper. as we have argued, unions and oppressed persons generally can no longer, if they ever could, put their unbridled faith in the courts, laws or governments to enforce and protect workers’ fundamental human rights. since at least the 1970s, canadians have witnessed the progressive dismantlement of keynesian-era social programs amidst an increasingly militant and recalcitrant capitalist class offensive. while psac local 70396’s struggle with the cmcc may be considered a victory, scores of losses in the decades preceding and since then mar the political landscape. the attacks against the collective bargaining rights of workers should unmistakably be understood as acts of class war. a twenty-first century unionism, then, must come to terms with an increasingly aggressive capitalist class-state nexus and the limits of unionization as an end in itself; only then may the political potential of a working class unionism rekindle the struggle for realizing a world without capitalism. the ottawa and gatineau museum workers’ strike: precarious employmentand the public sector squeeze 140 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times references: albo, g. (2009). challenges for urban social justice movements, neoliberal urbanism, the canadian city and toronto. toronto: centre for social justice. albo, g. (2010). the ‘new’ economy and capitalism today. in n. pupo and m. thomas (eds.), interrogating the new economy: restructuring work in the 21st century. toronto: university of toronto press. armstrong, p., carol amaratunga, jocelyne bernier, karen grant, ann pederson and kay wilson (eds.). (2001). exposing privatization: women and health care reform in canada. aurora, on: garamond press. arat-koc, s. (1997). from mothers of the nation to migrant workers. in a. bakan and d. stasilus (eds.), not one of the family: foreign domestic workers in canada. toronto: university of toronto press. bakan, a and d. stasilus (eds.). (1997). not one of the family: foreign domestic workers in canada. toronto: university of toronto press berton, p. (2001). the great depression: 1929-1939. toronto: anchor. bezanson, kate, and meg luxton (eds.). (2006). social reproduction: feminist political economy challenges neoliberalism. montreal & kingston: mcgill-queen’s university press. blatt, s. legal communication, october 30, 2009. http://www.psac-afpc.org/ documents/bargaining/oct30letter_facebook_issue-e.pdf braedley, s., and m. luxton (eds.). (2010). neoliberalism and everyday life. montreal & kingston: mcgill-queen’s university press. brassard, r. (2009). interview with priscillia lefebvre on november 15, 2009. brenner, n. (1999). globalization as reterritorialization: the rescaling of urban governance in the european union. urban studies 36, 3, 431-451. broad, d. and g. hunter. (2010). work, welfare, and the new economy: the commodification of everything. in n. pupo and m. thomas (eds.), interrogating the new economy: restructuring work in the 21st century. toronto: university of toronto press. burke, m., c. mooers and j. shields. (2000). restructuring and resistance: canadian public policy in the age of global capitalism. halifax: fernwood. c news. murphy, j. & godfrey, t. air canada workers back at work friday. canoe .ca, june 16, 2011, http://cnews.canoe.ca/cnews/ canada/2011/06/13/18277961.html camfield, d. (2011). the ‘great recession’, the employers’ offensive and canadian public sector unions. socialist studies, 7 (1/2), 95-115. camfield, d. (2011b). lessons from the canada post lockout. rabble, http://rabble.ca/blogs/bloggers/behind-numbers/2011/07/lessonscanada-postlockout | 141 camfield, d. (2011c). canadian labour in crisis: reinventing the workers’ movement . halifax, ns: fernwood publishing. carroll, w. k., & shaw, m. (2001). consolidating a neoliberal policy bloc in canada, 1976– 1996. canadian public policy, 27, 195–217. cbc news. (2009a, november 12). “war museum pickets honour remembrance day.” cbc .ca, http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa/ story/2009/11/11/war-museum.html cbc news. (2009b, october 22). “striking museum workers spoof exhibit.” cbc .ca, http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa/story/2009/10/22/ ottawa-museum-workers-spoof-exhibit.html clement, w. (2007). “methodological considerations: thinking about researching work” in work in tumultuous times. v. shalla and w. clement (eds.). montreal, qc: mcgill-queen’s university press. clement, w. and g. williams (eds.). (1989). the new canadian political economy. montreal & kingston: mcgill-queen’s university press. clement, w., s. mathieu, s. prus and e. uckardesler. (2010). restructuring work and labour markets in the new economy: four processes. in n. pupo and m. thomas (eds.), interrogating the new economy: restructuring work in the 21st century. toronto: university of toronto press. clc. “clc supports striking museum workers.” canadianlabour .ca, october 28, 2009, http://www.canadianlabour.ca/national/news/ clc-supports-striking-museum-workers-asks-union-members-not-visitcivilization-and-war cmcc. “dr. victor robinovitch renewed as head of the canadian museum of civilization corporation.” civilization .ca, december 18, 2009, http://www.civilization.ca/cmc/media/press-releases/2009/dr-victorrabinovitch-renewed-as-head-of-the-canadian-museum-of-civilizationcorporation cobb, c. “psac to mount campaign against federal job cuts.” the vancouver sun, june 17, 2011, http://www.vancouversun.com/news/ psac+mount+campaign+against+federal+cuts/4966648/story.html ctv news. “angry postal workers rally before returning to work.” ctv . ca, june 27, 2011, http://www.ctv.ca/ctvnews/topstories/20110627/ strike-canada-post-mail-delivery-resuming-tuesday-110627/ das gupta, t. (1996). racism and paid work. toronto: garamond press. debs, e. (1905). class unionism. retrieved june 21, 2011 from, http://www. marxists.org/archive/debs/works/1905/classunionism.htm engels. f. (1881). trade unions. retrieved june 22, 2011 from, http://www. marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1881/05/28.htm evans, b. and g. albo. (2010) “permanent austerity: the politics of the canadian exit strategy from fiscal stimulus.” in c. fanelli, c. hurl, p. lefebvre, and g. ozcan (eds .) saving global capitalism: interrogating the ottawa and gatineau museum workers’ strike: precarious employmentand the public sector squeeze 142 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times austerity and working class reponses to crises (pp.7-28). ottawa: red quill books. evans, b. and j. shields. shrinking the state: globalization and public administration . halifax: fernwood. fanelli, c. and c. hurl. (2010). “janus-faced austerity: strengthening the ‘competitive’ canadian state.” in c. fanelli, c. hurl, p. lefebvre and g. ozacan (eds.), saving global capitalism: interrogating austerity and working class reponses to crises (pp.2949). ottawa: red quill books. fanelli, c. and j. paulson. (2010). municipal malaise: neoliberal urbanism and the future of our cities. the bullet, 357, http://www. socialistproject.ca/bullet/357.php fanelli, c. and m. thomas. (2011). austerity, competitiveness and neoliberalism redux: ontario responds to the great recession. socialist studies, 7 (1/2), 141170. fisher, d., rubenson, k., bernatchez, j., clift, r., jones, g., lee, j., macivor, m., meredith, j., shanahan, t., & trottier, c. (2006). canadian federal policy and postsecondary education. vancouver: centre for policy studies in higher education and training. galabuzi, g.e. (2006). canada’s economic apartheid: the social exclusion of racialized groups in the new century. toronto: canadian scholars press. gonick, c. (2009). “a great leap forward?” in j. guard and w. antony (eds.), bankruptcies and bailouts (pp. 8-17). halifax: fernwood. government of canada. (2011). a low-tax plan for jobs and growth. retrieved june 12, 2011 from, http://www.budget.gc.ca/2011/plan/ budget2011-eng.pdf harvey, d. (2005). a brief history of neoliberalism. oxford: oxford university press. hussey, i. and p. leclerc. (2011). “the big smoke” screen: toronto’s g20 protests, police brutality, and the unaccountability of public officials. socialist studies, 7 (1/2), 282-302. institute of wellbeing. (2009). “how are canadians really doing?” retrieved june 17, 2011 from, www.ciw.ca/en/ thecanadianindexofwellbeing.aspx kane, l. “feds table legislation to end air canada strike.” the vancouver sun, june 15, 2011, http://www.vancouversun.com/business/feds+table +legislation+canada+strike/4948582/story.html kumar, p. and chris schenk (eds.). (2006). paths to union renewal: canadian experiences. peterborough: broadview langille, d. (1987). the business council on national issues and the canadian state . studies in political economy, 24, 41-85. | 143 lewchuk, w. m. clarke and a. de wolff. (2011). working without commitments: the health effects of precarious employment. montreal and kingston: mcgill-queen press. loxley, j. and s. loxley. (2010). public service private profits: the political economy of public-private partnerships in canada. halifax, ns: fernwood publishing. marx, k. (1866). the different questions. retrieved june 11, 2011 from, http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/iwma/documents/1866/ instructions.htm#06 –– (1871). r . landor, interview with karl marx . retrieved june 22, 2011 from, http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/bio/media/marx/71_07_18.htm –– (1990). capital . vo .1. london: penguin. marx, k. and f. engels. (2002). the communist manifesto. london: penguin. mcbride, s. (2001). paradigm shift: globalization and the canadian state. halifax: fernwood. mcbride, s. and h. whiteside. (2011). public austerity, private affluence: economic crisis and democratic malaise in canada. halifax: fernwood. mcbride, stephen, and john shields. (1997). dismantling a nation: the transition to corporate rule in canada. halifax, ns: fernwood. mckeen, w. and a. porter. (2003). politics and transformation: welfare state restructuring in canada. in w. clement and l. vosko (eds.), changing canada: political economy as transformation (pp. 109-134). montreal & kingston: mcgill-queen’s university press. mcnally, d. (2011). global slump: the economics and politics of resistance. oakland: pm press. noonen, j. (2009). the windsor cupe stike: implications for the labour movement and the left. the bullet, 236, http://www.socialistproject.ca/ bullet/bullet236.html panitch, l. and s. gindin. (2004). global capitalism and american empire. london: merlin press. panitch, l., g. albo and v. chibber (eds.). (2010). the crisis this time, socialist register 2011. london: merlin press. panitch, leo and donald swartz. (2003). from consent to coercion: the assault on trade union freedom, 3rd edition. toronto: garamond. peck, jamie. (2001). workfare states. new york & london: the guilford press. perelman, m. (2011). the invisible handcuffs of capitalism: how market tyranny stifles the economy by stunting workers. new york: monthly the ottawa and gatineau museum workers’ strike: precarious employmentand the public sector squeeze 144 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times review press. personal communication. (2009). interview with priscillia lefebvre on november 22, 2009. psac. (2009a, august 21). “museum workers deserve respect on the job.” psac .com, http://www.psac.com/news/2009/bargaining/20090821-e. shtml. psac. (2009b, october 10). “update for striking museum workers concerning unusual correspondence from cmcc.” psac .com, http:// psac.com/news/2009/bargaining/20091010-e.shtml psac. (2009c, november 9). “striking museum workers to throw picket line tea party in honour of prince charles.” psac .com, http://www. psac-afpc.com/news/2009/releases/72-1109-e.shtml psac. (2009d, december 11). “rally and concert to support striking museum workers.” psac .com, http://www.psac-afpc.com/news/2009/ releases/84-1209-e.shtml psac. (2009e, december 15). “museum strike is over.” psac .com, http:// www.psac-afpc.com/news/2009/releases/87-1209-e.shtml psac. (2009f, november 26). “negotiated settlement impossible museum reject final offer.” psac .com, http://www.psac-afpc.org/news/2009/ releases/77-1109-e.shtml psac. (2009g, december 2), “why we voted no.” psac .com, http://www. psac-afpc.org/documents/bargaining/why_we_voted_no-e.pdf psac. (2011, june 15). “psac members show support for their negotiating team at the national gallery of canada.” psac .com, http://www.psac afpc.org/news/2011/bargaining/20110615-e.shtml pupo, n. (1997). always working, never done: the expansion of the double day. in a. duffy, d. glenday and n.pupo (eds.), good jobs, bad jobs, no jobs: the transformation of work in the 21st century (pp. 144165). toronto: harcourt brace & company pupo, n. and m. thomas (eds.), interrogating the new economy: restructuring work in the 21st century. toronto: university of toronto press. québec parental insurance plan. (2011). emploi et solidarité sociale québec . retrieved june 21, 2011, from http://www.rqap.gouv.qc.ca/index_ en.asp radice, h. (2010). confronting the crisis: a class analysis. in l. panitch, g. albo, and v. chibber (eds.), socialist register 2011: the crisis this time (pp. 21-43). halifax, ns: fernwood publishing. rogers, g. and j. rogers (eds.). (1989). precarious jobs in labour market regulation: the growth of atypical employment in western europe. belgium: international institute for labour studies. ross, s. (2007). varieties of social unionism: towards a framework for | 145 comparison. just labour, 11, 16-34. ross, s. (2008). social unionism and membership participation: what role for union democracy? studies in political ecomony, vol .81 . retrieved from http://spe.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/spe/article/ view/4957 shalla, v. and w. clement (eds.). (2007). work in tumultuous times: critical perspectives. montreal & kingston: mcgill-queen’s university press. siltanen, j. (2007). “social citizenship and the transformation of paid work: reflections on possibilities for progressive change” in work in tumultuous times. v. shalla and w. clement (eds.). montreal, qc: mcgill-queen’s university press. stinson, j. (2010). labour casualization in the public sector. in n. pupo and m. thomas (eds.), interrogating the new economy: restructuring work in the 21st century. toronto: university of toronto press. teelucksingh, cheryl, and grace-edward galabuzi. (2005). “working precariously: the impact of race and immigrants status on employment opportunities and outcomes .” in t. das gupta, c. james, r. maaka, g.e. galabuzzi and c. andersen (eds.), race and racialization: essential readings (pp. 202-208). toronto: canadian scholar’s press. vosko, l (ed.). (2006). precarious employment: understanding labour market insecurity in canada. montreal & kingston: mcgill-queen’s university press. vosko, l. f. (2007). “gendered labour market insecurities: manifestations of precarious employment in different locations” in work in tumultuous times. v. shalla and w. clement (eds.). montreal, qc: mcgill-queen’s university press. warskett, r. (2007). “remaking the canadian labour movement: transformed work and transformed labour strategies” in work in tumultuous times. v. shalla and w. clement (eds.). montreal, qc: mcgill-queen’s university press. whittington, l. (2011, january 19). tax cuts drive harper’s rightwing agenda. toronto star, http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/ article/924121–taxcutsdrive-harper-s-rightwingagenda?bn=1 workman, t. (2009). if your in my way, i’m walking: the assault on working people since 1970. halifax, ns: fernwood. the ottawa and gatineau museum workers’ strike: precarious employmentand the public sector squeeze 146 | uniting struggles: critical social research in critical times problematizing the issue of cultural appropriation janice hiadki ontario institute for studies in education as a feminist cultural worker, i consider the subject of cultural appropriation a fundamental one for me to address. yet i do so hesitantly. first, appropriation continues to be a 'hot' topic in the white-dominated media, and since the discussion often focuses on the imaginative 'freedom' of whiteartists, thereis the danger ofperpetuating white concerns and obscuring h^emonic relations (hill, 1992a). second, when cultural workers from non-dominant groups argue for autonomy and self-determination, my political mstinct is to immediately support such a demand. to speak simply in agreement with and on behalf of marginalized voices can, however, be an attitude ofarrogance, and it does not help me, as a white woman, to question aspects of privilege in my own subjectivity and to challenge colonialist and hegemonic practices in the dominant culture. furthermore, un-interrogated support neither enhances my project of developing a political cultural practice focusing on transformation nor informs a politics of coalition and collaboration. third, questions about appropnation interpenetrate other complex issues that floodthe field ofcultural studies such as identity, difference, voice, representation, universality, and political correctness. none of these issues, either singly or in relationship—do they ever work singly?—are manifested intheory/practiceina simpleway. tryingto problematize appropriation feels like a formidable task; it is a highly contested, and possibly overworked terrain. in terms of my own entry into the issue, i think about what alternate routes, volume 11, 1994 alternate routes, volume 1 1, 1994 complications i will forget, omit, obscure, and have time and/or space for in this paper. finally, while i am conscious oftrying to avoid closure and conclusions in this essay, i will offer critiques, suggest approaches, and inevitably finish the marks of writing on some page to come. i want and need to insert some lucidity and cogency to my wrestling with the issue of cultural appropriation as i also attempt to make space for continuous/contiguous questioning and an ongoing state of mulling and puzzlement. i want to both hold 'appropriation' still and shake it up and shake it down, avoid it and confront it, and to settle in to an opinion and to hold on to a state of ongoing revisions and shifting perspectives. it is within this arena of contradictory toisions that i begin this paper. with the above cautions, contradictions, and hesitancies shadowingmy words, i will discuss two approaches to the issue of appropriation, and thai i will consider a third theoretical position that is a more complex reading of the issue in its problematizing ofpower relations. this latter approach draws on feminist and post-structuralist theories^ and is implicated in my ongoing revisionings/reversionings ofmy position as a feminist cultural worker. the term 'appropriation' and questions of resistance before turning to viewpoints on appropriation, i will briefly address a few of the varied understandings oftheterm as it is used in cultural studies. my intent is to indicate the range and complexity ofterminology rather than to catalogue the many contexts and meanings ofappropriation. in discussing 'resistance,' i emphasize the importance ofan analysis ofpower relations and demonstrate the imbrication of resistance, subversion, and opposition with issues of appropriation and cultural politics. my focus is on cultural appropriation as it has been addressed inthepast three to four years in the context of canadian cultural production. there has been an emphasis on issues of race, rq)resentation, abonginal self-determination, and the concerns ofnon-dominant cultures whose works and artifacts are appropriated by the dominant culture. in this regard, a number of hiadki/ problematizing cultural appropriation toronto-based cultural studies publications including ftas'^', border/lines, and parallelogramme, have foregrounded the concern with cultural appropriation.^ todd (1990), for example, has described appropriation through a strat^y of opposition: the 'inversion' of cultural appropriation is cultural autonomy. her emphasis is on origins and self-determination or unmediated native cultural production. according to todd, the appropriation of native culture is an abrogation of difference and a fetishization of the 'other' such that native sources become commodities to be desired and valorized with consequences of profit and acclaim for those appropriating. similarly, browning (1992) understands appropriation as taking the experiences of 'others,' interpreting them, and materially benefiting from them. in addition to the ongoing attention to appropriation in the various cultural studies journals mentioned above, toronto-area newspapers have also focused on appropriation,^ often with a link to the political correctness debate. popular cultural studies demonstrates different usages of the term 'appropriation.' some theorists consider appropriation in the context of resistant or oppositional reading practices of audiences. according to shoue %g^ (1990: 90), this 'trend' in popular cultural studies considers "the complex relation ofaudience pleasures to dominant social structures." drawing upon brecht's work, kipnis (1993) posits a notion of "refunctioning" whereby elements from the dominant culture are appropriated and transformed. this position shares similarities with ideas of pastiche, pirating, and pilfering (berland, 1993; hartnett, 1990; willis, 1990). lipsitz (1990:99) applies bakhtin's concept ofthe dialogic and the importance of social and historical contexts to popular music and suggests that the influence of the past on current rock music is "a dialogic process, one embedded in collective history and nurtured by the ingenuity of artists interested in fashioning icons of opposition." simon and giroux (1989:228) associate empowerment and opposition with the appropriation of popular cultural forms: popular forms have to be renegotiated and represented in order to appropriate them in the service of self and social empowerment. this suggests a critical pedagogy disrupting the unity ofpopular alternate routes, volume 11, 1994 culture in order to appropriate those elemoits which enable the voice of dissait while simultaneously challenging the lived expenences and social relations of domination and exploitation. these approaches are linked by an emphasis on transformation, opposition, and resistance. this notion of 'resistance,' however, needs to be problematized and some of its suppositions require questioning.'' sholle ( 1 990) suggests that the relationship of power, knowledge and resistance is often confused in popular cultural studies. the dominant culture allows for certain forms of resistance but there are also forms that "remain uncoopted bythe hegemonic culture" or that ''authentically [emphasis added] break with the dominant culture" (sholle, 1990:96). shoue's intent is to emphasize the need for popular cultural studies to differentiate and analyze forms of resistance. while a consideration of what kinds of resistance are possible within discourses is crucial, setting up a hierarchy of resistance requires coherent and determinate definitions of resistance such that boundaries are fixed and possibilities for opposition are limited and contained. shoue's point that "the question is not whether or not there is resistance but rather what it is and when it is significant [italics added]" also depends on definition ( 1 990: 97). but what is significant? for whom? who gets to decide? what does/ might resistance look like in specific socio-historic conditions? are there, for instance, 'openings' that point to the possibility of resistance, of producing ourselves as subjects dififerently? might resistance be understood as operating on a continuum? sholle's critique of willis's and corrigan's "trivial" examples of resistance is lodged in what sholle understands as an unspecified and unproblematized notion of political transformation. willis's and corrigan's possibilities for change are read as emotional reactions to regulation rather than as rewritings of discourses. sholle critiques this work in order to bring a channelled politicization to resistance and to emphasize that shifts in discursive formations are not initiated by emotional reactions stressing an analysis of power relations for resistance is important, but dichotomizing affective response from focused resistance does not recognize the complex hiadki/ problematizing cultural appropriation interplay of emotion, sensory experience, and corporeality in subversion and opposition (giroux and simon, 1989). i agree with sholle that it is not enough to merely affirm resistance and understand it as inherently political; it must be historicized and politicized. nevertheless, i would prefer to hold on to a more open concept of what constitutes "political significance" than that found in sholle' s insistence on locating resistance within a commitment to radical democracy. in what follows i will critique two fixed and competing views on appropriation that have been at the centre of the cultural appropriation debate, and i will offer more complex and open perspectives that present the possibility of challenging the limits ofthese first two approaches. i will not address questions about appropriation by focusing on a specific cultural form. rather, i will reflect on discussions that speak to the issue as it inheres in various forms of cultural production, and i will draw on the responses of writers who, from diverse subject positions, consider appropriation. i remain aware that issues are not identical for all non-dominant groups and in all forms of cultural production. in fact, i will argue for specificity and historicization—^how cultural producers and readers are invested in a text at particular socio-historic moments. cultural appropriation: concerns about authenticity and self-determination the first view of appropriation is expressed in the following manner: if any dominantgroup 's form ofcultural production uses the 'voices ' or experiences or materials of an oppressed group, it constitutes appropriation. one ofthe difficulties ofthis view is the underlying assumption that only the oppressed have authenticity. such a position suggests that "the oppressed express a truth that will win out. . . [and] language is seen as simply representing reality rather than constructing it" (razack, 1993:61). as lather (1991:164) points out, "there i s no ' correct' line knowablethrough struggle; " the concerns and the conditions of struggle in any community are constantly shiftingand "any useful theories ofsocial change must deal with this fluidity. " alternate routes, volume 1 1, 1994 the meanings oftexts are lodged in specific historical contexts and cannot be transferred into generalized conclusions about oppressed peoples: "whilewe need texts that affirm marginalized subject positions, however, it is important to be constantly wary ofthe dangers offixing subject positions and meanings beyond themomentwhen they are politicallyproductive"(weedon, 1987:172). it is important to stay alert to "how our multiple identities are constructed and played out at any one time in any one context" (razack, 1993:69). another aspect ofthis view is the implied understandingthat marginalized groups will automatically speak to issues of oppression. there are two problems that this raises. the first difficulty is the danger of reducing a work "to theme, to its about-ness'' since it may be ''about racism but is not reducible to it" (srivastava, 1991 :30-3 1). the work of a cultural producer from a non-dominant group is then considered according to how that work speaks to or for the issues of that group. as weedon (1987: 168) points out, however, "the race and ethnic background of a writer does not guarantee the race politics of a text." trinh (1991 :75) also indicates that "there can hardly be such a thing as an essential inside that can be homogeneously represented by all insiders." concomitant with this view is the demand and expectation to produce work that takes up issues of oppression. in referring to film and video by people of colour,' verjee (1992:42) notes: [e]vents are so sporadic and visibility so scarce, artists of colour are received mainly as political representatives, that is, they are expected to speak for and be accountable to their communities. structural and institutional exclusion and marginalization have meant that people of colour and their work must always bear the weight and burden ofthe concerns of race and racism. the public role for artists of colour and their work carries this burden of representation regardless of audience. this burden of representation, a condition of the historical marginalization, often means that questions of representation, gender and sexuahty are brought forward in reductive ways which foreclose the possibility for cntical dialogue. hiadkj/ problematizing cultural appropriation adopting the view that appropriation occurs whenever a dominant group uses the 'voice' of an oppressed group demands a confinement to instituting a prescriptive approach with rules and guidelines. a poliang that continues a colonialist perspective is then required. prescriptions, bemg unaiforceable, do nothing to challenge systemic racism and do not guarantee opportunities for the works ofnon-dominant cultural producers to be heard. furthermore, the policing approach provides a convenient hook for white, middle-class writers to vent their outrage about censorship, shout for artists' rights, and ignore racism issues (philip, 1990a). in addition, cultural producers with various privileges of access and acclaim can conveniently ignore any critical analysis when they take on the role of ally or adopt a simplistic form of support for those marginalized peoples struggling against appropnation. this is reflected in 'offenng' a space for the 'other' to speak, or unproblematically gettmg caught up in "waves ofbenevolence" (spivak, 1990:63). trinh (1991:72) illuminates this point: this is akin to saying that a non-white view is desirable because it would help to fill m a hole that whites are now willing to leave more or less empty so as to lessen the critical pressure and to give the illusion of a certain incompleteness that needs the native's input to be more complete, but is ultimately dependent on white authority to attain any form of 'real' completion. such a 'charity' mission is still held up with much righteousness by many, and despite the many changing appearances it has taken through the years, the image of the white colomal saviour seems more pernicious than ever since it operates now via consent. furthermore, when white artists dismiss charges of appropriation by responding with an 'i'm-on-your-side' response, they conveniently ignore their place in white cultural domination. in articulating this pomt. hill (1992a: 14) refers to an artist's letter m fuse: ^^ alternate routes, volume 11, 1994 conditions which are necessary to transform some or to abolish others. for to say that there cannot be a society without power relations is not to say either that those which are established are necessary, or, in any case, that power constitutes a fatality at the heart of societies, such that it cannot be undermined. instead, i would say that the analysis, elaboration, and bringing into question ofpower relations and the 'agonism' between power relations and the intransitivity of freedom is a permanait political task inherent m all social existence. appropriation occurs within a social context that reaps rewards for some and disenfranchises others. benefits accrue to those in the dominant culture who view knowledge as universal, who ignore the painful complexities ofhegemonic relations. giroux (1992:234) has noted that it is important to mterrogate "how dominant configurations of power privilege some cultures over others, how power works to secure forms of domination that marginalize and silence subordinated groups." delpit's ( 1 988) notion ofthe rules which encode the "culture ofpower" is helpful here. for those 'outside' this field, learning the rules makes for the possibility of acquinng power. arguing for strategies of access is a recommaidation to learn rules; change rules; break rules; and create new, multiple, non-rule possibilities for change. it is also a recognition ofthe importance of analyzing forms of regulation and resistance in discursive formations. neither delpit northose theorists positing a need for a consideration ofaccess are advocating a worid where all cultural groups should learn the codes and rules of the dominant culture. rather, their point is to remain aware of, and alert to, the shifts and changes in power relations in the field of cultural politics and to ask about who gets to speak, under what conditions, and with what consequences (black and morns, 1992; fung, 1992-93; hill, 1992a; philip, 1990a).'* kulchyski (1992:177-178) illuminates this issue in his discussion of the subversive practices of native peoples: hiadki/ problematizing cultural appropriation resistance involves constructing enclaves of culture within the established order, offinding space within the interstices ofpower, ofcontrollingthe pace and nature oflinks with the dominant social organization and culture, of adapting western technology to precapitalist soaal relations, of taking the tools offered by the state and capital and using them to stroigthen rather than destroy primitive culture. an examination ofwhere concerns about 'voice' lie, andhow power and privilege are positioned to serve the 'right' ofthe dominant culture are issues that must be considered. it is imperative to ask why the 'ability' to use the 'voice' of non-dominant cultures is usually an ability of those from a dominant culture and not the reverse. it is also important to note that the ability to do so is fuelled by racist, sexist, and capitalistic practices and is accompanied by privilege: it is an ability which serves that privilege. it is, m fact, that very privil^e that is the enabling factor in the transformation ofwhat |tj|?^ is essaitially an exercise of power into a right. that right in turn becomes enshrined and privileged in the ideology servicing the soaety in general. the 'nght' to use the voice of the other has, however, been bought at great price—the silencing of the other; it is, in fact, neatly posited on that very silencmg. it is also a nght that exists without accompanying obligation, and a right without an accompanying obligation can only lead to abuse. (philip, 1990a:212) what i find useful in philip's discussion ofracism and censorship is her clarity about how a racist society serves to support individualized notions of cultural production and how racism will inevitably be reflected in cultural work (philip, 1990a; 1990b). appropriation is not about individual rights. philip wrestles with questions about whose discourse is served, and asks what, where, why, andhow "techniques and tactics ofdomination" (foucault, 1980: 102) are at work. alternate routes, volume 1 1, 1994 drawing upon thework of said, lather ( 1 99 1 :33) also links oppression with questions of representation: it is "the formidable difficulties of empire" that are at the root of the crisis of representation and the consequent paradoxes of producing and intimating knowledge in a post-foundational context. to challenge canons, to expose systems of power which authorize some representations while blocking others—^this has beai part of the self-proclaimed task of the uprising of the marginalized, the silenced, the ex-centrics. issues of representation require a complex analysis concomitant with questions of access and an imbncation of anti-racist issues with those of gender, sexuality, and ethniaty. all of these concerns require specificity: a consideration of their interplay at particular socio-historic momaits can suggest transformative possibilities for the future. further layeringand complications are introduced with a problematizing of notions of 'absolute reality' and an 'authentic outsider' such that a space is provided whereby rigid definitions of insider/outsider can be questioned, locations of difference can be understood as fluid rather than fixed, and definitions or categories of cultural identity can be interrogated. as trinh (1991 : 76) asserts: "t is not unitary, culture has never been monolithic, and more or less is always more or less in relation to a judging subject." a difficulty with the position that insists on all-encompassing notions of self-determination and community is its link to essentialism, identity politics based on rigid parameters, and a search for and belief in autonomy. in the call for a fixed, determined, and defined position, another 'truth' is offered up to replace other fixed approaches. there is an assumption that this position can stand autonomous from the complex imbncation of discursive formations. but any theoretical approach both produces, and is produced by, various discourses that intersect at particular historical moments. a fixed notion of community is at stake when a political space is demarcated such that any dominant group's form of cultural production that hiadki/ problematizing cultural appropriation uses the material of a non-dominant group is understood as cultural appropriation. anumber ofquestions then emerge. ifthi s response to appropnation requires a cx)nsistent and unified community 'voice,' is there any space for questioning and dissenting positions? who has the authority to name the parameters of appropnation and decide if a work 'fits' or not? are voices of disagreement silenced when, with so much at stake, a community is in struggle to challenge painful inequities in cultural areas such as education, funding, dissemination, and critical attention? are there multiple ways to make meaning m collectivity rather than merely representing unity? can contradiction, dissent, and tension enhance and create, rather than threaten political possibilities? how can political alliances be shaped that avoid a collapse into unified identity? how can coalition, collaboration, and community politics encourage multiple points of entry? while engaged in the concrete struggles of everyday life, can an approach of ongoing critical attention be emphasized such that "a single discourse does not become the locus of certainty and certification" (giroux and simon, 1989:24)? in order for communities and groups to engage in counter-hegemonic t|ff and resistant cultural practices and make claims on the economic and cultural monopolies ofthe dominant culture, the idea of 'appropriation' requires acts of definition. there is always the inherent danger, however, that parameters will be established whereby what fits or does not fit becomes determined and policed, and what is legitimate and can be promoted becomes fixed and enshrined. a helpful strategy is to adopt "a willingness to recognize that a representation may 'mean' differently in place, in moment, and in particular minds" (lubiano, 1991:159).^ an analysis of cultural appropriation needs ongoing complication, restructuring, and refocusing. in her consideration of appropriation, verjee (1992:46) argues for movement "forwardthrough critical dialogue ratherthan revertingto reductive analyses." i understand critical dialogue as that which emphasizes the interrogation of social and historic conditions and examines relationships of power and knowledge (foucault, 1980; weedon, 1987). weedon's descripalternate routes, volume 1 1, 1994 tion ofa feminist post-structuralist framework is pertinent for problematizing the issue of cultural appropnation. such an approach ...addresses subjectivity, discourse and power in an attempt to show that we need not take established meanings, values and power relations for granted. it is possible to demonstrate where they come from, whose interests they support, how they maintain sovereignty and where they are susceptible to specific pressures for change. (weedon, 1987:74-75) with the above considerations in mind, how might bases of power be shifted? keeshig-tobias ( 1 990 : 1 77), for example, suggests that "there comes a time whai.all white supporters of native causes will have to stqj back...and let the real native voices be heard." remembering trinh's cautions raised around the 'authentic' subject, i question how a 'real' native 'voice' can be unproblematically identified. concomitantly, however, i am suspiaous of plunging into a wave of circular questions while avoiding actions that might aigage the possibility of transforming power relations. however, to conclude with only an open call to action here would be an inappropriate gesture. this propels me to introduce two reservations about the conceptual shifts i am attempting to map out in this paper, and i would suggest that they are related. first, while i am problematizingthe notion of cultural appropnation and reworking its theoretical frames of reference, i am also holding on to the strategic use of the term for cultural politics. appropnation has concrete matenal effects for particular groups of people engaged in cultural practices at the beginning of this paper, i mentioned that i was altering its terrain from sites of contradictory tensions, and one ofthe tensions is situated in my investmaits in both sustaimng and problematizing 'cultural appropnation ' second, although i have pointed to the importance of attending to the speafic histoncal relations, conditions, and possibilities of cultural production, i have not focused on one particular case in detail . attention to cultural appropnation in terms of one cultural text and the specific configurations of hiadki/ problematizing cultural appropriation its production and recqjtion would provide a concrete way to think through the dilemma of both problematizing and sustaining 'cultural appropriation.' in conclusion, the issue requires ongoing questions and a layered critique rather than quick-draw solutions . instead of avoiding or erasing the term 'cultural appropriation,' i choose to underline its contested meanings and provisional uses: to think of the term as "a site of permanait opainess and resignifiability" (butler, 1992: 16). impropriation "has to be kept alive as a/7ro6/e/w [italics added]" (spivak, 1990:63): as a theoretical and political problem. wrestling with the queries of this paper is not an abstract exercise. in terms of my own practices, i wonder how to establish a political subject, 'feminist cultural worker, ' that does not foreclose notions ofwhat constitutes 'feminist' and 'cultural worker.' iwanttobuildatransformative, oppositional cultural politics'*^ based on collaboration, collectivity, and community that rewrites potentialities for the future. in doing so, i want to stay open to ongoing shifts in, and challenges to, notions ofresistance, identity, difference, and coalition. if fluidity and complexity in meaning-making are erased, |||(f possibilities and potentialities for social diange and transformation will be diminished. notes 1. 1 am not suggesting that i have drawn from a singular and coherent body ofwork in these fields. both feminism and post-structurahsm are highly varied and contested terrains and their interplay is complex. but it is their interplay that interests me for thinking through questions of subjectivity, discourse, the production of knowledge, power relations, resistance, and social change. 2. fuse, in particular, has published numerous articles that either focus on, or pay some attention to, cultural appropriation. a recent issue (summer, 1993) takes cultural appropriation as its theme. 3. see, for example, conlogue (1992), godfrey (1992), and ross (1991). 4. this discussion is, of necessity, brief and it does not take into account how ae category of 'resistance' is used in analyses other than that of cultural studies, such as in feminist and (^ alternate routes, volume 11, 1994 post-structuralist theories. for the latter, see alonso (1992: 404-425), foucault (1982), game (1991). macleod (1992), mohanty (1992), and pathak and rajan (1992). an attention to resistance, however, is significant for theorizing poutical cultural practices as well as the relationship of audiences to cultural texts. 5. in his essay, fung (1992-93) discusses the problems associated with the phrase 'people of colour' and refers to a number of sources for an examination of terminology. i use the phrase here in the context of verjee's use of it. 6. for a comprehensive analysis of arts councils, see bailey (1992) who also includes letters by faith nolan, alan gotheb, marlene nourbese phihp, and anne collins. 7. a recent issue of the journal ofcommunication (1992) focuses on pohtical correctness and the impucations for communication studies. lawrence grossberg, everette dennis, and a number of other writers point out that pohtical correctness does not have a fixed, coherent or consistent interpretation and that diverse understandings and questions inform the terrain of this term. 8. paul wilhs (1990:3) suggests that non-dominant groups may also engage in resistance to strategies of access: it may be that certain kinds of symbolic creativity in the expressive and communicative activity of 'disadvantaged' groups exercise their uses and economies in precisely eluding and evading formal recognition, pubhcity and the possible control by others of their own visceral meanings. 9. as fung (1992-93:50) points out, "there is no absolute representational remedy." 10. as 1 write this, 1 feel a need to interrogate my understandings of 'transformation,' 'cultural politics,' and my engagement in a struggle for social transformation. that project and its theorization and embodiment is continual and will have to be tiie subject of other writings. references alonso, a.m. 1992 "gender, power, and historical memory: discourses of serrano resistance." in j. butler and j.w. scott (eds.) feminists theorize the pohtical. new york: routledge; 404-425. hiadki/ problematizing cultural appropriation bailey, c. 1 992 "fright the power: arts councils and the spectre ofracial equity." fuse \5 (5): 22-34. berland, j. 1993 "bodies oftheory, bodies ofpain: some silences. '' harbour. 2 (2): 14-21. black, a., and r. morris. 1992 "more back talk: race, sex, differaices and literal methods." fuse, 15(6): 18-21. browning, j. 1 992 "self-determination and cultural appropnation." fuse 1 5 (4): 3 135. butler, j. 1992 "contingent foundations: feminism and the question of 'postmodernism'." in j. butler and j.w. scott (eds.) feminists theorize the pohtical. new york: routledge; 3-21. churchill, w. ^ 1992 "colonialism, genocideandtheexpropriationoflndigenous spiritual traditions in contemporary academia." border/lines. (23): 39-4 1 . conlogue, r. 1 992 "artists must resist political pieties of left and right." the globe and mail. june 6 : c 1 3 . delpit, l.d. 1988 "the silenced dialogue: power and pedagogy in educating other people's children.'' harvardeducational review. 58(3): 280-298. fastwiirms. 1992 "letter to the editors." fuse. 15 (6): 4. foucault, m. 1980 "two lectures." in c. gordon (ed.) power/knowledge: selected interviews and other writings 1972-1977. new york: pantheon; 78-108. foucault, m. 1982 "the subject and power." critical inquiry. (8): 777-795. alternate routes, volume 11, 1994 fung, r. 1992-93 "colounng the screen: four strategies in anti-racist film and video." parallelogramme . 18 (3): 38-53. game, a. 1 99 1 undoing the social: towards adeconstructive sociology. toronto: university of toronto press. giroux, ha. 1992 "cultural workers and the pedagogy of cultural politics: writing against the empire." in ha. giroux, border crossings: cultural workers and the politics ofeducation. new york: routledge; 230250. giroux, h.a., and r. i. simon. 1989 "schooling, popular culture, and a pedagogy of possibility." in ha. giroux and r. simon {oas.) popular culture, schooling and everyday life. toronto: oise press; 219-235. godfrey, s. ^••s 1 992 "canada council asks whose voice is it anyway?" ttie globe and^^ mail. march 21: ci, c15. grossberg, l. (ed.) 1992 "symposium: communication scholarship and political correctness." journal ofcommunication. 42 (2). hartnett, s. 1990 "cultural postmodernism and bobby mcferrin: a case study of musical production as the composition of spectacle." cultural critique. (\6):6\-s5. hill, r. 1992a "one part per million: white appropriation and native voices." fuse. 15(3): 12-22. hill, r 1 992b "response to letter to the editors." fuse 15 (6): 5-6. keeshig-tobias, l. 1990 "the magic of others," in l. scheier, s. sheard, and e. wachtel (eds.) language in her eye: views on writing and gender by hiadki/ problematizing cultural appropriation canadian women writing in english. toronto: coach house; 173177. keeshig-tobias, l. 1991 "lenore keeshig-tobias." in h. lutz, contemporary challenges: conversations with canadian native authors. saskatoon: fifth house; 79-88. kipnis, l. 1993 "repossessing popular culture." in l. kipnis, ecstasy unlimited: on sex, capital, gender, and aesthetics . minneapolis: university ofminnesota press; 14-32. kulchyski, p. 1992 "primitive subversions: totalization and resistance in native canadian politics." cultural critique. (21): 171-195. lather, p. 1991 getting smart: feminist research and pedagogy with/in the postmodern. new york: routledge. lipsitz, g. 4^ 1990 "against the wind: dialogic aspects of rock and roll." in g. lipsitz, time passages : collectivememory andamerican popular culture. minneapolis; university of minnesota press; 99-132. lubiano, w. 1991 "shuckin' offthe african-american native other: what's po-mo' got to do with it?" cultiiral critique. (18): 149-186. macleod, a.e. 1 992 "hegemonic relations and gender resistance: the new veiling as accommodating protest in cairo." signs. 17 (3): 533-557. maracle, l. 1990 "native myths: trickster alive and crowing." in l. scheier, s. sheard, and e. wachtel (eds.) language in her eye: views on writing and gender by canadian women writing in english. toronto: coach house; 182-187. alternate routes, volume 1 1, 1994 martin, b., and c.t. mohanty. 1986 "feminist politics: what's home go to do with it?" in t. de lauretis (ed.) feminist studies/ critical studies. bloomington: indiana university press; 191-212. mohanty, c.t. 1992 "feminist encounters: locating the politics of experience." in m. barrett and a. phillips (eds.) destabilizing theory: contemporary feminist debates . stanford, ca: stanford university press; 74-92. pathak, z., and r.s. rajan. 1992 "shahbano." in j. butler and j.w. scott (eds.) feminists theorize the political. new york: routledge; 257-279. philip, m.n. 1 990a "the disappearing debate: racism and caisorship." in l. scheier, s. sheard, and e. wachtel (eds.) language in her eye: views on writing and gender by canadian women writing in english. toronto: coach house; 209-219. ^ijs phihp, m.n. ^^ 1990b "the 6% solution." fuse. 14 (1-2): 28-29. razack, s. 1993 "story-telling for social change." genderandeducation. 5(1): 5570. ross, v 1991 "appropriation-of-voice issue 'an absurdity' author says." the globe and mail. october 21: ci. schulman, b. 1991 "feminists, political correctness, and tree' speech." sojourner: the women 's forum. 17 (2): 19-20. scott, j.w. 1992 "experience." in j. butler and j.w. scott (eds.) feminists theorize the political new york: routledge: 22-40. sholle, d 1 990 "resistance: pinningdown a wandering concept in cultural studies d\scoutse.'' journal ofurban and cultural studies. 1 (i): 87-105. hiadki/ problematizing cultural appropriation spivak, g.c. 1988 "explanation and culture: marginalia." in g.c. spivak, in other worlds: essays in cultural politics. new york: routledge; 103117. spivak, g.c. 1990 "questions ofmulti-culturalism." in g.c. spivak, the post-colonial critic: interviews, strategies, dialogues. new york: routledge; 59-66. srivastava, a. 1991 "imag(in)ing racism: south asian canadian women writers." fuse. 15 (1-2): 26-34. todd, l. 1990 "notes on appropriation." parallelogramme . 16 (1): 24-33. trinh, m.t. 1991 when the moon waxes red: representation, gender and cultural politics. new york: routledge. verjee, z. ^q) 1992 "the colours of culture: film and video by people of colour." parallelogramme. 17(4): 38-47. weedon, c. 1987 feminist practice and poststructuralist theory. oxford: basil blackwell. wiuis, p.e. 1 990 common culture: symbolic work atplay in the everyday cultures of the young. boulder, co: westview press. apitalism ature ocialism a journal of socialist ecology edited by james o'connor university of california, santa cruz cns is the only serious red-green theoretical journal in die world. it is edited by a distinguished group of scholars and scholar activists, half ofwhom are north american, the other half from a variety of countries. cns seeks to meld the traditional concerns of labor movements with the ecological struggles in particular, and demands of the new social movements in general. to this end, it publishes articles, reviews, interviews, documents, and poems that locate themselves at the site between history and nature, or society and the environment. the result is a publication that explores such topics as historical ecology, marxism and ecology, sustainable development, philosophy of nature, political economy of ecology, socialist eco-feminism, environmentalism and the state, and ecological racism. articles include: • strategies to advance labor and environmental standards: a north-south dialogue, john cauaruugh • political philosophy and environmentalism in britain, david pepper • sustainable development through the development of the non-farm sector, surul ray • ecology and the critique ofmodem society, herbert marcuse sample copies availablei subscription information issn 1045-5752, volume 5,1994(4 issues) individuals: $22.00, outside u.s.: $27.00 (sur^e mail), $37.00 (airmail) institutions: $65.00, outside u.s.: $80.00 (airmail) also available in better bookstores. guilford publications, inc. 72 spring street, new york, ny 10012, attn: joutn.ii> oopi. call tollfrcc 1-800-365-7006, 9 am to s pm est (in area codes 212, 718, 516 & 914. call 212-431-9800), fax 212-966-6708 the dominion government as gatekeeper to the canadian ethnic mosaic : the case of quebec, 1867-1885 dan glenday introduction social scientists concerned with the study of ethnic relations have made use of many concepts to describe the forms ethnic interaction have taken. in the vast american literature on the subject; assimilation, prejudice, discrimination and pluralism have had the longest history (wirth: 1956; rose: 1968; simpson and yinger: 1972). criticisms of all these approaches are bountiful, but need not concern us here since this essay will address itself to only one of these processes, namely, the dynamics of ethnic pluralism as it has historically manifested itself in canada between the two "charter groups" (for a definition of "charter group", see hughes (1952: 23)1. we begin with louis kirth's classic statement on minority aims entitled "the problem of minority groups" (1956: 237-60). wirth defined minorities as objectively occupying a disadvantageous position in society (1936: 238). their subordinate status within society translates into "their unequal access to educational opportunities and in their restricted scope of occupational and professional advancement" (1956: 258). as to their social origins, wirth noted that most minorities were indigenous or earlier arrivals to the territory than were the dominant group. through conquest the dominant group achieved its position of power in the society. in referring to canada, wirth remarked that "the earlier french settlers are a minority in relation to the more recent english migrants. in almost all colonial countries it is the "foreigners" who are dominant and the indigenous populations who are subordinate" (1956:239). therefore, any discussion of ethnic relations must begin with the differential access to power and resources as experienced by different ethnic groups within the nation-state. what is more, when analysing power relations between ethnic groups, we must also admit the significance of powerful individuals and yo m.g. smith (1965) and l. kuper and m.g. smith (1969), derek smith emphasizes "that conflict or confrontation within the plural society is between distinctly separate, culturally differentiated sections each pursuing its own institutional arrangements and, at least in the extreme limiting case, have no value consensus between them or common participation in core institutions of the society as a whole (1975: 16; emphasis added mine). the important point to note in smith's summary is the significance of internally generated forces for change. what we wish to add is any concrete situation can give rise to structural strains whose cause may be isolated in a sphere other than the economic and political. as a result, there may well be political and economic consequences to both the dominant group and subordinate minority. a word or two should be mentioned concerning our acknowledgement of the significance accorded to political and economic factors for any analysis of social change. what is more, these factors can be analytically divided into external and internal influences on the total social system. our concern for the moment though is to stress the importance of one internal factor to a rural based social system demographic change within the subordinate ethnic group. to summarize, pluralism denotes one way in which different ethnic groups have created their own sets of institutions in the face of an assymetrical allocation of resources within a particular nation. in colonial societies, the indigenous population is likely to be located in a structurally subordinate position vis-a-vis the dominat ethnic group. within the subordinate ethnic, population change can have significant repercussions for the total social system. 31 families that make up the elites within ethnic communities (schcrmerhorn : 1970; rex: 1970; blauner: 1972). further on in the article, wirth divides minority aims into four types; assimilationist , secessionist, militarist and pluralist (1956: 2451. assimilation is the aim of a minority when its members desire absorption and like treatment with the dominant ethnic group. but, in order for such a strategy to be even moderately successful, the dominant group must accept their (ie. minority) participation in the society at large. secessionist aims are characterized by wirth as the struggle for cultural and political independence from the dominant group. a minority that seeks domination over a one time dominant group is defined as militant. finally, pluralism "is the conception that variant cultures can flourish peacefully side by side in the same society" (1956: 245). the operative verb in that sentence is "can". the effectiveness of "peaceful co-existence" between dominant and subordinate ethnic "roups is contingent on numerous circumstances such as the size of the ethnic minority, the differences in race, language and/or religion between the dominant and subordinate ethnics and the nature of the social relationship between the dominants and the subordinates such as master-slave or exploiter and exploited. one must remember that the balance is precarious and can collapse at any particular moment. wirth's typology is exhaustive but does not explain under what circumstances minority aims can change. a contemporary canadian writer on the subject of ethnic pluralism, perck smith, began his investigation by cataloguing pluralism into two general types pluralism as a political theory of 'open' or democratic societies and an anthropological theory stressing culture contact and conflict. basing his analysis of conflict in plural societies on the works of furnivall ( 1942 ; 1948) . m population decrease could lead to cultural or linguistic assimilation into the dominant group. population growth would result in structural pressures toward the expansion of occupational and social service institutions within the community. population growth within the subordinate ethnic group will put pressure on the minority elites to seek ways of expanding its political, economic and social frontiers. these demands will lead to conflict between the subordinate minority and the dominant ethnic group. demands for a greater share in jobs, services or even physical space caused by population, growth will be interpreted by the dominant group as a threat to their own appropriation of these resources and services. we base this hypothesis on the assumption that at any particular historical moment, power contests are a 3cro-sum game. this essay then will be concerned primarily with the internal structural and historical factors that account for the loss of dualism in canada as a whole but resulted in the quebec provincial boundaries becoming the sole territorial and political domain within which linguistic and cultural rights for french -canadians could be effectively guaranteed. in other words, we are addressing ouselves to the processes that have led to the isolation of the province of quebec as the "patrie" for french-canadians living within confederation. what we are about to describe represents one of the necessary conditions from which an analysis of the contemporary secessionist movement in quebec can be understood. hopefully, this essay may also provide some indicators as to how plural societies can give rise to secessionist movements. 12 ethnic pluralism in quebec hubert guindon (1964;1968) argues that ethnic pluralism in quebec historically has taken the form of "self-satisfying, self-segregated institutions' in all spheres of social life except at work and in politics. yet, even in the work-world, "ethnic contact was established (only) with the introduction of industrialization" in rural quebec (1968: 56). previous to this period, which guindon benchmarks with confederation, the rural french-canadian was "busily involved in reproduction and parochial settlement (196s: 52). guindon argues that as a rural society, quebec, by the third quarter of the nineteenth century was faced with a structural crisis. "the stability of the (rural) system" had been maintained "by handing down the family farm to one inheriting son" which ne3nt that "thj system required an ever expanding geographi al base in order to absorb the suplus population" (1968: 43-44; emphasis auded mine). a rural system based on (1) a single-son farm inheritance scheme and (2) the availability of enough arable land within a given territorial unit proved to be an unstable arrangement. once arable land became a scarce resource in the equation, the traditional society was faced with an internal ly generated source of strain. unless suitable farm land outside of quebec could be found and colonized under the leadership of the traditional elites the political leaders and the roman catholic church, or new means for rural surplus population absorption found inside quebec, the system faced a structural crisis. according to guindon, by confederation the rural system was faced with surplus rural population seeking arable land (1968: 53). *3 ethnic pluralism outside quebec by accepting guindon's explanation of ethnic pluralism and the basis for structural strain in quebec society for the period leading up to confederation, we might well ask what happened to this surplus rural population since we know that the rural system 'survived' until well into the mid-twentieth century. industrialization "from above" by "foreign" capitalists has been one explanation offered to account for the source of rural surplus population abosrption. anglo-saxon industry moved into a society faced with an acute population surplus, a distinctive political and religious elite, and a developing set of institutions anchored in the rural parish . . . they could invest their capital, open industries, and be supplied with an abundant source of unskilled labour seeking employment. the managerial and technical levels were filled, with no protest, by the incoming group, who also brought along their own set of institutions servicing their own nationals . . . industry was relieving the economic burden of the demographic surplus of french-canadian rural society. the local elite's leadership was not being challenged (1968: 56-57). industrialization "from above" though did not have a sufficiently profound impact on rural quebec society until well into the second decade of the twentieth century. what happened to the surplus population in the years between confederation and the first world war? geographic expansion became the only alternative open to both the traditional elites and the young men and women seeking land on which to settle. the routes that could be taken were (1) westward into the canadian prairies, (2) south to the industrial towns in new england and the american mid-west, or (3) internally generated efforts on the part of the catholic church towards colonizing new lands in the quebec hinterland. kk quebec, the manitoba act and the l.ouis riel rebellion of is85 : ethnic marginal ity in the canadian prairies the worst option for the traditional elites (political and religious), but an excellent opportunity for the rural sons and daughters was to work in the industrial towns of new england (macdonald; 1966: 183-85). writing in 1891, p. hamon estimated that over 400,000 french canadians had become workers in american factories (1891: 173). the number of emigrants from quebec between 1875 to 1890 had tripled (1891: 174). nathan keyfitz has reported that by 1921 a conservative estimate of emigrants from quebec to the usa was 1 and 3/4 millions (kade; 1960: 136-37). we can summarize that from 1891 to 1921 over 1 1/4 million french canadians emigrated to the u.s.a. the lack of sophistication in these statistics due to the fact that neither the canadian nor the american government kept accurate emigration records still does not erase the trend that a remarkable number of french canadians left quebec during the decades from 1880 to 1920. we might conclude that many more people left during this forty year period than in the previous 120 years. this trend was also evident in english canada, especially ontario. donald creighton, quoting from the toronto mail in 1887 states that 'there is scarcely a farm house in the older provinces where there is not an empty chair for the boy in the states' (1957: 354). even though this trend can rightly be seen as a phenomena that gripped all of canada, the seriousness with which it was greeted in quebec was as a crisis of the social system. the social basis from which an important segment of the traditional elite, the roman catholic church drew its authority was located in the farming communities of rural quebec. ajiy threat to the social stability of the rural system would at the same time directly jeopardize their authority and indirectly affect the power base of *5 the political leaders. what conditions precipitated this option over emigration to manitoba or colonizing isolated regions within quebec? what forces were responsible for such a vast exodus of french canadians out of the country? in part, i am sure that the lure of a better standard of living in the united states contributed to this exodus. certainly, this ideological factor cannot be seriously treated as the necessary and sufficient condition that explains the location of frenchcanadian emigration. well-established classic sociological tradition holds that ideological and cultural formations can only be adequately understood by reference to the material structures of society. besides, the depression of the seventies and the eighties did not result in repatriation to quebec or to manitoba. what structural factors can we begin to isolate that may provide a fuller picture? we could begin by concluding that a lack of historically developed links between the quebec elites and the population towards the canadian west would have eliminated this alternative for the rural quebecers. norman macdonald has made the opposite point in that: "the lure of the west had been in the blood of the french canadians ever since the days of the fur traders, and the metis figure prominantly in its colourful history. in the hope of arresting their exodus to the u.s.a., sir john a. macdonald and george e. cartier favoured extensive settlement in the west and it has been hinted that 'the manitoba constitution was purposely made bilingual in the hope of deflecting the french canadians from the united states to the west" (1966: 189-90). the west appeared as an attractive alternative to the overpopulated parishes of rural quebec. we turn to the history of colonization in the canadian west up to confederation in order to get a clearer picture of its ethnic composition and how the settlers viewed their colonies. u6 the first settlement in the territory was the selkirk colony founded in 1818. over 2/3 of the original settlers were scottish. the remainder were french canadians. in time, the french canadians equalled the number of scottish and english settlers and "because of this ethnic mixture the colony was described as ' un petit quebec '" (wade; 1955: 393). the ethnic division of labour in the colony was divided into three tiers. the most influential group were the english who dominated both trade and government, followed by a homogeneous scottish agricultural group and the more numerous french canadian and metis groups who followed an agricultural and semi-nomadic hunting life. chester martin has observed that "the policy of building up a smaller quebec upon the bar.ks of the red river had been patiently and successfully pursued for more than fifty years" (1920: sbo) . quoting sir stafford northcote at the time of the manitoba act, creighton records that "the french are earne:tly bent upo". the establishment of a french and catholic power in the north-west to counteract the great preponderance of ontario". their purpose was to fix the character and institutions of the new province at a time when frenchspeaking roman catholics formed a large part of its population, and therefore at the nost favourable moment for preparing defences against the approaching influx of protestant, english speaking settlers " (creighton; 1969: 6; emphasis added mine) . let us take a closer look at the macdonald-cartier proposal for a bilingual manitoba. referred to by norman macdonald as "deflecting french canadians fror the united states to canada", it may be recalled that the manitoba xct ensured equality for the english and french languages in the legislature and the courts and provided for separate or confessional schools in the newl\. created province. *7 to the claim that the provisions of the manitoba act of 1870 represented the westward extension of the philosophy of "cultural compact", creighton in his important article entitled "john a. macdonald, confederation and the canadian west" (1969: 1-9), counters with the argument that the bicultural and bilingual clauses of the act which dealt with equality of the english and french languages in the legislature, courts and separate (confessional) schools, resulted from riel's "dictatorship", from the necessity of a quick settlement at red river and security for canada's continental destiny. they did not represent, he says, "the carrying out of a solemn commitment to biculturalism which had been made at confederation". they were imposed by an "exceptional and transitory" set of circumstances and not by an ideal conception of what canada should be, (1969: 6-7). what were some of the measures that macdonald and the conservative federal government took to insure that the west would never become "un petit quebec". in 1873, only three years after the manitoba act and in the same year as his french-canadian partner george e. cartier died, sir john a. macdonald introduced a bill into parliament which founded the north west mounted police. in july 1874, three hundred men set out for the northwest. the "fundamental purpose" of the police and the government officials who were soon to follow "was to ake ready the land of the west for the coming of settlers. the older order was gone forever" (creighton; 1957: 360). what was meant by "the old order"? which settlers would be enticed to coae and would be welcomed in manitoba? were the n.w.m.p. sent to manitoba simply to 'protect' the indians and metis from bootleggers or were they also sent as the extension of the federal government whose aim was to inaugurate "a new order" in which the french canadians living there would become margi-.al to the political life of the province? creighton's interpretation of macdonald's concessions to the red river rebels can be understood as a temporary hindrance to the overall policy of immigration from outsice canadian borders. an immigration policy that would emphasize the english-fact in canada, especially that part of canada west of ontario, was to be the tacit design of the canadian federal government. obviously, for such a scheae to be successful emigration from quebec to manitoba would not be encouraged. and yet there were men who could read the true intentions of the federal governeent . one such man was bishop tache. as early as 1869, this roman catholic leader of the metis and the french-canadians living in manitoba on his return to rome recorded his bitter feelings on the imminent disappearance of the french fact in the northwest and the role of the canadian government as contributing to the demise of french-canadian society in that territory west of ontario. writing to george e. cartier, he laments his having always feared the entrance of the north west in confederation, because i have always believed that the french canadian element would be sacrificed; but i tell you frankly it had never occurred to me that our rights would be so quickly and so completely forgotten (martin; 1920: 367). we turn to the colonization efforts by french canadian political and religious elites to locate french canadian settlers in manitoba. what obstacles did they face? the efforts of one man, senator girard, are instructive in this regard. in march, 1875, the federal government awarded girard as head of the colonization society of manitoba, four townships in the red river. there was, however, a major condition: within two years seventy settlers must be located ^9 on them. girard ran into trouble immediately when he attempted to relocate expatriate french canadians who had been living in new england onto this manitoba soil because "so many orangemen had settled on its reserve that in one township (alone) there was no room for anyone else, with the result that sixty french canadians repatriates were reported to have returned to new england. the society accused the orangemen of indulging in a racial and religious war, in order to disrupt its work of repatriation". no matter how many protestations were made by the society to the federal government "the orangemen were left in possession of the field" (macuonalj; 1966: 190). indications of a policy of foreign immigration into manitoba as the preferred policy can be gleaned from the account of the government and cpu's efforts to attract southeastern european to manitoba. from the year/ 1880 to 188s, the canadian government had spent thousands of dollars in vain to entice settlers from south-eastern europe to come to canada. in the spring of 18ss, agents of the canadian pacific railway in the united states discovered a hungarian nobleman named count paul de esterhazy who was more than willing to use his influence to attract his compatriots living and working in the united states to come to manitoba. most of these immigrants were under contract labour to work in the pennsyvannia coal mines. but, the u.s. had abolished contract labour in 1882 so that these immigrants could freely move, if they so desired. esterhazy believed that his countrymen would be well disposed to the idea of settling in the canadian west as farmers instead of the status of poorly paid mine workers in the united states. andrew marchbin records the first encounter between representatives from the canadian government and count esterhazy. 50 the canadian pacific railway, greatly interested in the colonization of the company's lands in the west, invited esterhazy to the dominion . . . after a personal audience with the governor-general, esterhazy made his formal request on may 9, 1885, for the formation of mi 1 itary settlements in the canadian west; settlements which would be colonized with hungarians then living in the united states, who, while being trained farmers had also had military experience and could be used in case of rebellion or invasion to defend british interests . the proposal was highly interesting to the government and especial ly to the minister of agriculture the hon. f.h. pope. the department was willing to extend some financial assistance as its officials had long been interested in finding suitable settlers for manitoba and the north west territories. (1934: 112; emphasis added mine). why would any one man make such a proposal unless he believed, especially after having spoken with the xovemor-general , that such an idea would be appealing to certain influential members of the canadian federal government? why would men within the federal government approve of such a plan unless they felt that the danger posed by french-canadians in manitoba was not only a serious internal matter but contrary to their vision of the west as a unilingual territory. had the federal government not been influenced by considerations of ethnicity and language (i.e. an english-speaking nation), the logical decision would have been to invite (and even subsidize) quebec farmers to settle the west. for what better way of appeasing the anxious red river valley french canadians than by forging a cohesive nouveau quebec, and alleviating quebec's over-populated parishes as well? the canadian government had clearly not 1 favored such a development. the first succssful settlement was called hun valley which was under the leadership of gcza de dory who "not only showed them how to break the land and level the forest but also taught them the english language" ( 1 93-t : 115). 51 the quebec reaction how did quebec view the red river rebellions and the manitoba act of 1870? laurier lapierre has succinctly captured the feeling of quebec during the years immediately following confederation when he says: "in spite of cartier's presence, french canadians had begun to experience the pangs of political and racial insecurity almost immediately after 1867. viewing with alarm the agitation (in ontario) over the granting of an unconditional amnesty to the french-speaking metis who had participated in the ricl insurrection of 18t>970, many french-canadians wondered if confederation was not already a failure. they became even more concerned when in 1871 the government of new brunswick ended government subsidies to roman catholic schools in the province. in both cases all attempts to force the federal government to redress what french canadians considered infringements on their rights failed. tartc echoes these sentiments 'l'on serait tente de croire qu'il y a une immense conspiration contre la race francaise dans la dominion'" (1962: 9] . cartier had died in 1873, the same year macdonald founded the m.w.m.p. and many french-canadians at the federal level now felt uncertain as to the degree of their political influence. such concerns were soon to lead the frenchcanadian elites to a drastic change in political allignments. the main concerns of many french canadians in both the liberal and the conservative parties prior to 1885 was to forge a co-operative effort at the federal and provincial levels in order to arrest the emigration of frenchcanadians from their parishes in quebec. as we have seen, the attempts to settle repatriated french-canadians on western soil could not be considered a success. lapierre echoes the concern of the french-canadian political elite when he remarks "only seven years after confederation (1874) , french canadian politicans of every persuasion were viewing the position of their province with dissatisfaction and alarm" (1962: 19). 52 the riel rebellion of 1885 was to seal the fate of french-canadian aspirations of westward expansion into the canadian prairies. it forecast the demise of french-canadian political influence at the federal level. the reaction in quebec was at once quick and decisive and "increased in intensity after riel was captured and french-canadians increasingly saw his fate as an indication of their own hope of national survival" (1962: 148). the federal government was now faced with the "dual .problem of choosing between the demands of quebec and those of ontario and then of reconciling quebec to its decision" (lapierre; 1962: 146). the consequences of the hanging of riel were such that "the (frenchcanadian) political leaders would not forget the limit of their power which the affair had revealed. the french-canadian ministers had not been able to influence their colleagues" (lapierre; 1962: 169). george stanley also remarks that as a result of the "crisis of 1885, the most conservative province in canada swung over to the liberal party, a position which was consolidated by the selection of a french -canadian, wilfred laurier, as leader of that party in 1887" (1960: 381). in the autumn of the same year (1887), five provincial delegations from nova scotia, new brunswick, quebec, ontario and manitoba, four of whom were liberals, met in quebec to work our proposals for increased provincial powers (creighton; 1957: 365-66). 53 conclusion the social history of ethnic pluralism in canada as it affected frenchcanadians reveals the emaciation of their society and confinement to the quebec provincial boundaries. the hypothesis explored in this essay suggests that the events leading up to the riel rebellion of 1885 represent the watershed in the westward expansionary hopes of french-canadians. we have also noted that the federal government's role can be interpreted as one of complicity in the outcome. this essay has argued that the increase in quebec's population is a singularly important factor in the relations of a subordinate ethnic group (the french) to the dominant 'charter' group (the english). whereas the quebec elites the roman catholic clergy and hierarchy in particular attempted to influence les jeunes francais to remain within the dominion and within the established french roman catholic church in manitoba, the english political elite deemed otherwise. the death of riel signalled the end of ethnic dualism, not only in manitoba, but in all the western provinces. the finality to the process came with the enactment of the manitoba school act of 1916 which established english as the sole official language and created a secular public school system for the province. only in quebec would the principle of ethnic dualism be enshrined in law and in fact. the quebec reaction to the role of the federal government in guaranteeing french-canadian rights in the nation'as a whole from confederation to the rebellion of 1885 was one of uncertainty but hope. as we have pointed out, the manitoba act of 1870 represented a temporary political compromise. the federal government had been caught off-guard and therefore had to submit to the rebels' 5^ demands until such time as it could extend and consolidate itself in the western hinterland. the cpr and nwmp represented such structural links. the only recourse left to the political and religious elites in quebec was to turn inwards. the political elite would demand greater provincial autonomy from the federal government. the claims for more provincial autonomy which it held in common with the other provinces who sought greater freedom of action gave it added strength to realize these demands. the roman catholic church also turned inward and began to sponsor colonization efforts in the hinterland regions of the province. (ryan: 1966). the internal demographic factor the surplus quebec population confronted both the dominant and minority group. the political elite of the former effectively prevented dispersion of french-canadian institutions and culture within the dominion. the latter political and religious elites have pushed respectively for increased provincial autonomy and up to the second world war fostered the migration of surplus population within quebec itself as one way of alleviating the internally generated structural crisis. the intransigence of the federal government towards a preferred british and unilingual manitoba was carried to that province with the election of thomas greenway as premier in 1888. greenway ended the use of the french language in government and stopped public support to catholic schools. t. peterson has convincingly argued that manitoba took on a decidedly british character in the period froc the riel rebellion until well into the twentieth century (1972: 69115; . as a direct consequence of these historical forces the french-canadians outside quebec would be relegated to a marginal position in the political sphere. the power of numbers and the roman catholic church as a pressure group would be the only countervailing factors that the french-canadians outside quebec could 55 count on to help preserve their cultural and linguistic rights. what is more, these historical forces set in motion a collective feeling of distrust by french-canadians within quebec towards the federal government. they also evinced the conviction that only by effectively manipulating the provincial against the federal political structures could a form of "special status' for quebec be realized. unlike the other provincial governments where the demand for increasing autonomy was rooted solely in economic motives, such a demand from quebec was also linked to cultural and linguistic survival and would be aggressively pursued throughout the twentieth century. 56 references blauner, robert creighton, donald furnivall, j.s. guindon, hubert hamon , p. hughes, everett c. lapicrre, lauricr macdonald, norman marchbin, andrew a. martin, chester morton, k.l. racial oppression in america , (new york: harper and row, 1972). dominion of the north: a i i i s tory of canada , (toronto: macmillan: 1957), new edition "john a. macdonald, confederation and the canadian west", in craig brown (ed.), minorities, schools and politics , (toronto: university of toronto press: 1969), pp. 1-9 colonial policy and practise: a comparative study of burma and netherlands india , (cambridge : at the univers i ty press, 1948). "two cultures", in r. leach, contemporary canada , (durham: duke university press: 1968), pp. 53-59. les canadiens francais de la nouvelle angleterre, xquct>cc: 1891) , volume i, pp. 7-10 as quoted in georges langlois, historic de la population canadiannefrancaise , (montreal: alberta levesque: 1934) . rhe sociological eye , (chicago: aldine atrerton, 1971). "politics, race and religion in french canada: joseph israel tarte", unpublished ph.d. dissertation, history, university of toronto, 1962. canada immigration and colonisation, 1841-1903 , (toronto: macmillan, 19t>8) . "the origins of migration from south-eastern europe to canada", canadian historica l association annual reports , 1934, pp. 110-120. "the first 'new province' of the dominion", canadian historical review , vol. i, 1920, pp. 360-380. "our 'kingdom for a horse': the railway land grant system in western canada", canadian historical association , annual reports , 1934, pp. 73-79. "manitoba schools and canadian nationality, 1890-1923", in craig brown (ed.), op. cit . , pp. 10-18. 57 peterson, t. rex, john rose, peter i . ryan, w.f. schermerhorn, r.a. simpson, george e. yinger, j. milton smith, michael g. smith, michael g. kuper, leo stanley, george f.g. wade, mason (ed.) wirth, louis "ethnic and class politics in manitoba", in martin robin (ed.). canadian provincial folitics: the party system of the ten provinces , (toronto: prenticehall, 1972) , pp. 69-115. race relations in sociological theory , (new york: schocken, 1970) the subject is race , (new york: oxford, 1968). the clergy and economic growth in quebec (1896-1914) , (quebec: university of laval, 1966) comparative ethnic relations , (new york: random house, 1970). racial and cultural minorities: an analysis of prejudice and discrimination , (new york: harper and row, 1972), 4th edition. the plural societies in british west indies , (berkeley: university of california, 1965). pluralism in africa , (berkeley: university of california, 1969). the birth of western canada , (toronto: university of toronto press: 1960) . canadian dualism . (toronto: university of toronto press, 1960). the french canadians, 1760-1945 , (toronto: macmillan, 1955). "the problem of minority groups", in l. wirth (ed.), community life and social policy: selected papers , (chicago: university of chicago press, 1956). free trade and social policy reform: the hidden dimension? «/. rachel macdonald school of social work carleton university current debates in canada about the merits or shortcomings of free trade have been framed in a number of different ways. both the canada-u. s . free trade agreement (cusfta) and the north amencan free trade agreement (nafta) have been addressed and assessed in terms of job creation or loss, the possibihty of increased environmental degradation, and the potential threats to political and cultural sovereignty. despite all the seemingly disparate claims and arguments that are made, however, the free trade debate has at its base a fight between essentially two competing visions ofthe canadian economy. on the one hand, there are those who oppose free trade and argue for a strong national industnal policy that commits the state to policies of full employment, national instruments of accumulation (i.e. crown corporations), demand-side management, and universal welfare rights. on the other hand, proponents of free trade see the proper role of state policy as promoting market innovation, enhancing structural competitiveness through supply-side intervention, and subordinating welfare policy to the demands ofthe 'free' market (see jessop, 1 993 : 9). given the contours of this debate, one ofthe more intriguing questions about the issue of free trade is how the curroit agreemaits will affect the ^ alternate routes, volumel 1, 1994 development and implementation of social welfare policy under a regime committed to the dommance of the free market. indeed, the uncertain future of canada's social programs—family allowances, old age security, public pensions. medicare, education, and social assistance—was a central concern dunngthecusftaandnafta discussions. inmy currait research, i argue that free trade has three detrimental impacts on canada's social welfare policy. first, free trade encourages a shift from 'universal' to 'selective' or 'residual' social programs, thus undermining any real social commitment to the redistribution of wealth and income. second, free trade encourages 'policy harmonization,' thus threateningto reduce canada's social programs to american and mexican levels. finally, trade agreements bind the nationstate, both directly and indirectly, from pursuing social policies that may be mterpreted as restricting access to markets or as discouraging profit-making. rec«it changes to the definition of poverty, cutbacks to medicare, and proposals aimed at replaang canada's social safety net with wage supplementprograms illustratethe degreeto which the ideological underpinnings of free trade have already dramatically altered social policy in canada. the ideology of free trade: its origins and growth the present rush toward continental 'free trade' represents the culmination of over two decades of debate on developmental strategies for the canadian economy. bnefly, the ongin ofthis debate can be traced to the economic crisis confronting all western capitalist economies in the mid 1970s. rising inflation coupled with increasing levels of unemployment produced a phenomenon of 'stagflation' that threatened to stall the growth engine of the west. in canada, as in other countries, this challenge was most commonly addressed bytwodifferentprescnptionsforthe future. one, drawing upon the tradition of keynesianism, argued that the solution to canada's economic woes lay with increased state intervention. proponents of this view argued that the state needed to play a more active role in promoting scientific research and development in order to boost a declimng manufactunng sector. this argument was advanced by a number of academics and think-tanks, such as macdonald/free trade and social policy reform the science council of canada, and taken up by elements of the left, the labour movement, and english canadian nationalists who believed that a national industrial strategy would help reduce american corporate power (brodie, 1989:176-177). a very different vision of economic development, however, was put forth by an increasingly powerful coalition of neo-liberal think-tanks and influential elements of the business community (see richardson, 1992:321322). these actors argued that the post-war policies ofkeynesian economics and welfarism had produced a mammoth and cumbersome state bureaucracy that was choking off private investment and growth. to alleviate this problem, the size and activities ofthe state needed to be scaled down and the control ofthe economy returned to the allegedly more efficient private sector. these neo-liberal economic views were translated mto electoral victones in the united states and in britain (brodie, 1 989: 177). free trade has been from the start a key component of neo-liberal economic philosophy. in fact, the idea itself stems from the work of the classical economist, david ricardo, who in the early nineteenth century ^j^ developed the 'law of comparative advantage.' briefly, ricardo believed that with free trade between nations, all countries would prosper as each began to specialize in an area of production in which it held a competitive advantage over the others . rather than tryingto produce everything for itself, the nation which is best suited to produce a certain product, because of some natural or other advantage, should specialize in the production ofthat product and export the surplus. for example, ricardo suggested that because of its climate and soil, portugal would excel at the production ofgrapes and wine. on the other hand, because ofits industrial infrastructure, britain could excel at textile manufactunng (watkins, 1992:93-94; mcgaughey, 1992:36).' according to classical liberal economists, the only way that the real 'benefits' of free trade could be realized is if the protectionist and interventionist tendencies of the state could be curtailed. that is, free trade abroad needed to be balanced by a policy oflaissez-faire economics at home. lurking inside ofarguments for free trade, as watkins ( 1 992 : 94) convinangly argues. alternate routes, volumel 1, 1994 is the ideology of the new right, an ideology that advocates deregulation, pnvatization, and cutbacks to soaal spending. the emergence and dominance of this economic vision has forced a dramatic restructunng of the canadian state and soaal policy over the past 20 years. throughout the 1970s, for example, canada pursued an aggressive nation-building approach with respect to economic and social policy. the trudeau govemmait introduced such programs as fira (foreign investmoit review agency), the national energy plan (1973), and the canadian development corporation. these programs and agencies were designed to channel national capital into canadian-owned corporations and reduce foreign control over the nation's economy (clarkson, 1991 : 107). during this penod, the state also pursued an ambitious policy aimed at strengthaiing social welfare programs; the development ofmedicare as well as progressive reforms to old age security, unemployment insurance, and the canada pension plan underlined the state's commitment to universality. however, dunngthis period of nation-building, canadian capital had been consolidating and continentalizing at a rapid pace. canadian banks, real estate corporations, and media industries were particularly successful in expanding their reach into the united states and abroad.canada's corporate powers thus had little need or patience for the 'protectionist' and 'interventionist' canadian state. instead, they wanted fewer rules and regulations so that they could further extend their reach into the global market (clarkson, 1991:115-116; richardson, 1992:316; deblock and rioux, 1993:27-28). such structural changes in canada's political economy, coupled with an aggressive lobby-campaign launched by the business council on national issues (bcni), led to the signing ofthe canada-u s . free trade agreement (cusfta) in 1987 almost immediately after the agreement's ratification, the number of plant shut-downs, layoffs, and corporate mergers rose at an alarming rate. public opinion remained firmly against the deal, yet by 1990 the conservative government was entenng yet another round of free trade negotiations, this time a tnlateral deal with mexico and the united states. i macdonald/free trade and social policy reform it is clear that free trade is about much more than trade only—it is a wide-sweepmg prescnption for the creation of a society modeled stnctly on the 'laws' of laissez-faire economics. indeed, the discourse of 'free trade,' much like the discourse of 'free markets,' is inextricably attached to a long and complex intellectual tradition of individualism, and specifically to the rights of individual investors and entrepreneurs to move their capital around as they see fit (marchak, 1 989). free trade, moreover, is clearly presented in terms of national competitive advantage, and thus draws upon vulgar chauvimsms and crude forms of patnotism. there are other deeper supporting cultural conditions to the social vision offered by proponents of free trade. free trade is a high risk economic program and is thus easily presented in masculine terms of aggression ('capturing markets') and conflict ('beating the competition'). it is also a mode of assessing odds and determining outcomes, like gambling and sport spectacles—activities that underline its masculine bias. free trade, like the vision of 'community' offered by classical economists, is the brutal world where relations of competition and domination prevail, a world in which im nations and people are in perpetual conflict and struggle with one another (see hartsock, 1983:38-40). given that free trade, as it is proposed by neo-liberal economists, represents such a sweeping social vision, it is clear that its influence will extend throughout all elements of society. in particular, the ideology of free trade threatens to drastically alter the role the canadian state plays in the economic well-being of its citizens. by submitting ourselves to the 'law' of comparative advantage, we may be unwillingly subverting the very social programs and services that canadians have fought hard to achieve. indeed, one ofthe first 'victims' of free trade may be the very notion of universality itself. alternate routes, volumel 1, 1994 free trade and 'universality': toward a poucy of residuausm? universalityhas clearly been one ofthe most cherishedprinciples in canada's modest system of social security. it is a principle that sees social welfare as a citizqiship right by which all members of the nation, regardless of income or market power, are entitled to certain goods and services such as health care and education. this vision, however, is clearly jeopardized by the ideology and practice of free trade. free trade is part of a neo-liberal package that favours principles of 'selectivity' and 'residualism' in social welfare policy. suchpnnciples affirm the centrality of the family and private institutions in aiding those who have an inadequate income. 'selective' public relief should only be the last resort after all otherpnvate avenues ofsupport have been exhausted. inthismanner, as muszynski (1992:8-9) notes, a residual approach to social policy reinforces the belief that it is the market that is responsible for allocating social rewards. the market will reward those who have the motivation and desire to work and will punish those who 'choose' to remain idle. social policy, according to advocates of this position, must reinforce the 'justice' of the market by ensuring that the recipient of social assistance is kept as motivated as possible to enter the labour market. welfare programs can secure this only if they have long qualifying periods, long waiting periods, low benefit payments, or are admimstratively stigmatizing. a commitment to 'universalism,' on the other hand, paints a very different picture of the capitalist marketplace. universal social programs represent an attempt to provide a collective response to counter what is recognized as the inherent instability ofthe marketplace. from this perspective, it is assumed that the market is not 'just,' that it necessanly creates winners and losers, and that the responsibility for those who fail in the market is something to be shared by all of society. while residualism thus defines the objective of social policy in terms of temporarily alleviating poverty, universalism sees social policy goals more broadly in terms of building a sense of community through the redistnbution of wealth and power theremacdonald/free trade and social policy reform fore, while universalism may concede that markets are important mechanisms for the allocation of wealth, other criteria such as need, rights, age, residence, and citizenship are also seen as legitimate bases for the distribution of wealth and power (muszynski, 1992:9-10). the nature of free trade agreements, however, is such that mcreasmg pressure is applied to the state to shift its social policy agenda away from universalism and toward residualism. unrestncted competitive pressures between nations force the state to protect domestic capital by lowering the 'tax burden' on businesses. government spending on universal social programs, therefore, comes to be seen as a threat to canada's ability to compete in the continental marketplace. as such, pressures are applied to revamp or cut existing social programs and replace them with policies that are more cost-efficient, that induce people back into the labour force, and that target benefits only to those 'truly' in need. these policies have been a^ressively pursued by the canadian state since the signing of cusfta and nafta. the former conservative government ended the universal family allowance program and withdrew all ^q) federal support from social housing projects. new qualifying conditions have been attached to the unemployment insurance program that seriously undermine its universal accessibility. social assistance has also been seriously eroded by limitations placed upon the amount of federal money transferred to the provinces (swanson, 1 993 : 1 2). nowhere has the shift from universalism to residualism been more apparent than in the attempts to re-define poverty to include fewer, and ostensibly 'more needy,' people. drawing upon the work of christopher sarlo, the former house of commons committee on poverty recommended that the poverty line be 're-adjusted'—in one quick stroke, the number of canadians living before the poverty line could be reduced by as much as 90 per cent (murphy, 1 993 : 19). underlyingthis desire to re-define poverty is the thinly veiled beliefthattoo many canadians who do not really require benefits are receiving social assistance. alternate routes, volumel 1, 1994 by identifying the 'deserving poor,' the state is able to justify cuts and reforms to the social welfare system, reforms that threatai the principle of universality. as such, universal social programs are being turned into selective and residual programs, all in the name of cutting govemmoit expenditures in order to lessaithe 'tax burden' of transnational businesses. free trade and social poucy harmonization: whither medicare? a related danger inherent within free trade is that competitive pressures may force canada to 'harmonize' its social policies with those ofthe united states and mexico. unrestricted freetrade may compel the canadian stateto reduce social programs in order to 'match' its policies with that ofits tradingpartners (hum, 1988:25-26; drover, 1988:49-50). in the process, social programs such as medicare may be revamped in such a way as to mirror systems south of the border. while the issue of 'policy harmonization' amongst free-trading nations remains the subject of much debate, recent evidence suggests that there is indeed a linkage between trade liberalization and social policy harmonization (see drover, 1988). under free trade agreements, nation-states struggle to create, at the very least, a 'level-playing field' so that domestic capital is not encouraged to moveto areas wherewages are lower, environmental standards less stnct, labour policies more anti-union, and taxes lower. this situation thus creates a downward pressure on social policy as a country like canada is forced to compete with the united states and mexico where programs are much more pro-business. in canada, recent changes in the health-care system reflect the real dangers of policy harmonization. since the signing of the cusfta, healthcare workers have seen an increase in layoffs, privatization, and the contracting-out of services, while the public has witnessed hospital closures, cuts in services and the elimination ofmany procedures from public health insurance plans. the federal government has slashed health-care funding in an effort to macdonald/free trade and social policy reform cut its deficit, and 'user-fees' have been introduced by several provincial governments (fuller, 1 993 : 1 61 7). policy harmonization in the area ofhealth-care means that canada may be moving to a multi-tiered american-style system in which some services will be privatized, some doctors will opt-out, and user fees will be the norm. private specialized clinics already exist in alberta and it may not be long before other provinces pursue such policies as a way of dealing with rising health-care costs. the move to a privatized, decentralized and fragmented system, moreover, will help serve the needs of large health corporations and insurance companies who favour a competitive health care 'market' in which there is room, free from 'intrusive' state management, to reap profits. in the process, however, a two-tiered medical system may soon emerge: a hollowedout publicly financed one for the poor, and a capital-rich privately controlled system for the wealthy. free trade and the future of the nation-state debates around free trade pacts have also noted that such agreements tend to undermine the sovereignty ofnations, placing political power in the hands of transnational corporations or non-elected transnational agencies controlled by corporations. with the increasing ability of capital to move from one jurisdiction to another, nation-states are more than ever pressured to appease the interests ofcorporations, often to the detriment oftheir citizens . in the age offree trade, then, the ability ofthe nation-state to pursue progressive social policies may be curtailed by the growing political and economic power of capital. consequently, when the canadian state develops social welfare policies in the future, such policies will not only have to abide by the rules set out in the text ofcusfta and nafta, but they will also have to be structured in a way that benefits and promotes capital accumulation. for canadians to become more competitive in the 'global economy,' social programs may increasingly be seen as a way to entice foreign investment. for example, recently there has been some discussion about proposals, initially tabled by