Althea Medical Journal. 2017;4(2)

192     AMJ June 2017

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Prevalence and Characteristics among 
Administrative Staff at Dr.Hasan Sadikin General Hospital Bandung

Andrian,1 Nushrotul Lailiyya,2 Novitri3
1Faculty of Medicine Universitas Padjadjaran, 2Department of Neurology Faculty of Medicine, 

Universitas Padjadjaran/Dr. Hasan Sadikin General Hospital, Bandung, 3Department of Physical 
Medicine and Rehabilitation Faculty of Medicine Universitas Padjadjaran/Dr. Hasan Sadikin 

General Hospital, Bandung

Abstract

Background: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is a neurologic disease affecting hands, which is closely related 
to work, and is the most prevalent nerve compression disease. The incidence of CTS quite often occur in 
people working with their hands, for instance the administrative staff, especially in a busy workplace such 
as Dr.Hasan Sadikin General Hospital Bandung. CTS causes reduction in work productivity, and consequently 
degrading family welfare and the quality of public service. For that very reason, the prevalence and 
characteristics of CTS among administrative staff at Dr.HasanSadikin General Hospital Bandung needed to 
be revealed.
Methods: This quantitative descriptive study involved 94 administrative staff in the Medical record 
department of Dr. Hasan Sadikin General Hospital using the Carpal-tunnel.net questionnaire and further 
examinations by neurologists. Variables involved in this study were the subject characteristics.
Results: Out of the 90 subjects, 22 stated having symptoms related to CTS (prevalence, 24.4%). On further 
clinical examination, 3 were diagnosed of suffering from CTS (prevalence, 3.3%). 
Conclusions: Carpal tunnel syndrome is found among the administrative staff at Dr. Hasan Sadikin General 
Hospital Bandung  and the prevalence is lower than in the general population. A further study is required to 
reveal ther specific division in the hospital with the most prevalent CTS case. 

Keywords: Administrative staff, carpal tunnel syndrome, Hasan Sadikin, prevalence

Correspondence: Tara Zhafira, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Padjadjaran, Jalan Raya Bandung-Sumedang Km.21, 
Jatinangor, Sumedang, Indonesia, Phone: +6281311349612 Email: tarazhafira@yahoo.com

Introduction

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS) is the most 
prevalent median nerve disease, and also the 
most prevalent nerve entrapment syndrome, 
with the estimation that 3.8% of the world 
population is affected.1 Risks for CTS are 
related to work, and CTS is often ascribed as an 
occupational disease.2,3 Administrative work, 
especially in busy workplaces, is one of the 
jobs with highest CTS occurrence, along with 
other jobs such as secretarial, construction 
work, and production.4

Aside from physical and functional loss, 
people with CTS also suffer financial loss. 
Furthermore, a study in Washington State 
affirmed a significant financial loss is suffered 
by people with CTS each year, and the study 
underlined the significance of CTS prevention 
in workplace.3,5,6 According to information from 
the Human Resources Division of Dr. Hasan 

Sadikin General Hospital Bandung, currently, 
there are approximately 3000 administrative 
staff working every day at Dr. Hasan Sadikin 
General Hospital, and a study stated that 3.8% 
of the general population are affected by CTS, 
which means, approximately 114 out of 3000 
administrative staff  have CTS and the number 
will increase if prevention is neglected.1,6

Prevention needs to be performed, 
otherwise CTS will cause reduction in the 
sufferer’s family well-being and downgrade 
public service efforts.3 Nevertheless, not one 
study has been conducted on CTS occurrence 
and characteristics among the administrative 
staff at Dr. Hasan Sadikin General Hospital 
Bandung. Due to  those reasons, this study was 
conducted.

Methods

This study used the quantitative descriptive 

AMJ. 2017;4(2):192–6

ISSN 2337-4330  ||  doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15850/amj.v4n2.1077



193

Althea Medical Journal. 2017;4(2)

method with cross sectional design. This 
study was approved by Dr. Hasan Sadikin 
General Hospital Bandung and the Health 
Research Ethics Committee Faculty of 
Medicine, Universitas Padjadjaran according 
to Ethical Clearance Letter No. LB.04.01/A05/
EC/263/VII/2015. The study population was 
all administrative staff working at Dr. Hasan 
Sadikin General Hospital Bandung. Sample was 
taken from all administrative staff working  
in the Medical Record Division, which is one 
of the busiest hand-involving administrative 
jobs in the hospital, making it a high risk job 
for CTS. There were 94 workers in the Medical 
Record Division; however four workers were 
inaccessible. Two of them were taking holiday, 
one was sick, and the last one was unwilling 
to participate in this study. This study was 
conducted at all medical record offices and the 
Department of Neurology, Dr. Hasan Sadikin 
General Hospital Bandung in September– 
December 2015.

The study was initiated by conducting 
interviews and educating all medical record 
administrative staff regarding CTS. Those 
who stated having symptoms related to 
CTS during the interview were reffered to  a 
further interviewed using the Carpal-tunnel.
net questionnaire. The questionnaire was a 
validated self-administered questionnaire, 
developed by Bland et al.7 to be used by people 
with hands symptoms that were related to 
CTS. The questionnaire was used as interview 
material in this study with the author’s 
consent.

The questionnaire contained questions 
regarding the subject’s characteristics such as 
gender, age, smoking history, computer use, 
and handedness. Symptom characteristics, 
such as presence of pain, numbness, tingling, 
muscle weakness, persistency of symptom, and 
bilateral symptom are also contained in the 
questionnaire. The result of the questionnaire 
was a probability score of the subject having 
CTS.

It was suggested by the creator of the 
questionnaire to use  a cut-off point of 20%, 
instead of 40% which was originally used 
by the author,  in this study, so the subjects 
who scored over 20% were referred to 
the Department of Neurology for further 
examinations which consisted of history 
taking and provocative tests. The provocative 
tests comprised Phalen test, Tinnel test, carpal 
compression test, and hand elevation test. The 
examination was conducted by neurologists 
and the positive result was established when 
at least one provocative test was positive.

Furthermore, Phalen test was conducted by 
asking the subject to bend both wrists so that 
the dorsal part of the hands were in contact 
with each other for 60 seconds, positive result 
was established if the subject experienced 
tingling or numbness in the part of the hand 
innervated by the median nerve. Tinnel test 
was conducted by performing percussion 
over the carpal tunnel. Positive result was 
established if the subject experienced tingling 
in the part of the hand innervated by the 
median nerve. Carpal compression test was 
conducted by pressing the part of the hand 
between thenar and hypothenar eminences 
of the wrist for 30 seconds. Positive result 
was established if the subject experienced 
any CTS symptoms during the test. The hand 
elevation test was conducted by requesting 
the subject to lift both hands upright for 2 
minutes. Positive result was established if 
the subject experienced any CTS symptoms 
during the test, which was later analyzed using 
percentage to discover the prevalence.

Results

Out of 94 subjects included in this studyt only 
90 subjects were accessible.

There was no significant difference in the 
number of male and female subject in this study, 
causing the gender variable  proportional in 
number. The numberof male subjects was 
higher than the female. The higher proportion 
of medical record administrative staff  was less 
than 40 years old , causing more staff members 
were not in the high risk age for CTS, and this 
may affect the result of CTS prevalence within 
the staff (Table 1).

Twenty two staff members who stated  
having hand symptoms were further 
interviewed using the Carpal-tunnel.net 
questionnaire. The rest of the subjects were 

Andrian, Nushrotul Lailiyya, Novitri: Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Prevalence and Characteristics among 
Administrative Staff at Dr.Hasan Sadikin General Hospital Bandung

Table 1 Distribution of Respondent’s 
  Characteristics

Variable Amount of Subjectn=90 (%)
Gender
    Male 46 (51.1)
    Female 44 (48.9)
Age (years old)
    < 40 69 (77.7)
    ≥ 40 21 (22.3)



Althea Medical Journal. 2017;4(2)

194     AMJ June 2017

taken as negative subjects because CTS is 
mainly a symptomatic disease, although a 
study by Naseer et al.8 stated that CTS may be 
asymptomatic.

Six males and sixteen females stated of 
having a hand symptom, with fifteen out of 
the twenty two subjects were below 40 years 
in age, which is not a high risk age for CTS. 
The bigger proportion of non-high risk age 
subjects can be resulted from the initial bigger 
proportion of non-high risk age subjects 
before the interview was conducted (Table 2).

Most of the subjects experienced bilateral 
symptoms. Nearly all subjects interviewed 
had intermittent symptoms, leaving only one 
subject with a persistent symptom.

The most prevalent symptoms experienced 
by the subjects were tingling, pain during the 
day, muscle weakness, pain during the night, 
and numbness respectively. Those symptoms 
are consistent with the symptoms described in 
a previous study by Atroshi et al.1

After the second interview, there were 
only three subjects with CTS probability score 
above 20% and needed to be referred for 
further examination (Table 3).

The examination by the neurologist verified 
the three subjects referred for having CTS, and 
it was concluded that the prevalence of CTS at 
Dr. Hasan Sadikin General Hospital Bandung 
was 3.3%.

All three subjects were diagnosed as having 
bilateral CTS and had intermittent symptoms, 
which is indicative for mild CTS.9 The main 
symptom from the three positive subjects 
was tingling. Two females were diagnosed as 
having CTS. The three subjects with positive 
CTS were over 40 years old (Table 4).

Discussions

The study discovered that 2 out of 3 subjects 

Table 3 Symptom Distribution of 
  Respondent’s Symptoms Related to 
  CTS

Variable
Amount of 

Subject/ 
Frequency

Bilaterality
Yes 13
No 9
Symptom persistency
Persistent 1
Intermittent 21
Symptom description
Pain during the day
Only right hand 5
Only left hand 2
Both hands 2
No pain during the day 13
Pain during the night
Only right hand 5
Only left hand 0
Both hands 2
No pain during the night 15
Numbness
Only right hand 3
Only left hand 2
Both hands 1
No numbness 16
Tingling
Only right hand 6
Only left hand 1
Both hands 12
No tingling 3
Muscle weakness
Only right hand 4
Only left hand 1
Both hands 2
No muscle weakness 15

Table 2 Characteristic Distribution of 
  Respondents with CTS-related 
  Symptoms

Variable Amount of Subject
Gender
    Male 6
    Female 16
Age (year)
    < 40 15
    ≥ 40 7

with CTS were female, although the initial 
portion of subject’s gender is proportional.1,10 
This is consistent with other literatures stating 
that CTS is more prevalent in women.1,6,10, 11



195

Althea Medical Journal. 2017;4(2)

Andrian, Nushrotul Lailiyya, Novitri: Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Prevalence and Characteristics among 
Administrative Staff at Dr.Hasan Sadikin General Hospital Bandung

Ninety four subjects in this study were 
mostly under 40 years old, which is a non-high 
risk age for CTS. This study discovered that 
all positive subjects were above 40 years old, 
although the initial proportion of subject’s age 
was higher in the age below 40 years .

Three subjects examined by a neurologist 
were all diagnosed as having bilateral CTS, 
although one positive subject did not report 
any symptom on the left hand, supporting the 
study stating the presence of asymptomatic 
CTS.8

A previous study by Atroshi et al.1 stated 
that bilateral symptom commonly occurs in 
CTS, it was supported by the finding of two 
out of the three subjects having bilateral 
symptoms and the diagnosis of all three 
subjects as bilateral CTS in this study.1The 
most prevalent symptom reported by positive 
subjects was tingling, and this was consistent 
with the previous study stated earlier.

The results showed the prevalence of CTS 
among administrative staff at Dr. HasanSadikin 
General Hospital Bandung was 3.3% (3 out of 
90 subjects) which  was close but lower than 

the general world population prevalence 
discovered by Atroshi et al.1 which is 3.8%. 
The prevalence in this study may be lower due 
to many factors. One important factor is age, 
77% of all medical record administrative staff 
were under 40 years old, making most of them 
excluded from the high risk age for CTS.

Other factors causing difference in the 
prevalence result may be the number of 
subject, design, and method. The study 
conducted by Atroshi et al.1 involved 2466 
subjects, which was a lot more than this study, 
causing the study to have a high variation in 
the subject variable, besides the design of the 
study conducted by Atroshi et al.1 was a case 
control, giving the study the ability to compare 
variables (between case and control), identify 
risk factors, and a giving the study a greater 
and broader case definition.

The study by Atroshi et al.1 was conducted 
by sending mails to the subjects containing 
inquiries about symptoms. Two months later, 
the responders with and without symptoms 
(as a control) were clinically examined 
and underwent Nerve Conduction Studies 

Table 4 Distribution of Respondent’s Characteristic, Symptom, & Physical Exam

Variable
Subject 1 Subject 2 Subject 3

Right Hand Left Hand Right Hand Left Hand Right Hand Left Hand
Examination
Tinnel + + + + + +
Phalen - + + - + +
Carpal compression + + + - + +
Hand elevation + + + - + +
Diagnosis Bilateral CTS Bilateral CTS Bilateral CTS
Symptom 
Description
Pain during the day - - - - + -
Pain during the night - - - - + -
Numbness - - - - + -
Tingling + + + + + -
Muscle weakness - - - - - -
Bilateral symptom Yes Yes No
Persistency Intermittent Intermittent Intermittent
Subject 
Characteristics
Gender Female Male Female
Age (year) 48 57 53



Althea Medical Journal. 2017;4(2)

196     AMJ June 2017

(NCS), which is a more sensitive and specific 
examination for CTS than provocative tests. 
In addition, the two months’ time given to the 
respondents to fill in the inquiries gave them a 
longer time for symptoms recall than a direct 
interview.

The limited sample taken only from the 
Medical Record Division was the limitation 
of this study, as it might not cover all kinds 
of administrative work in the hospital. In 
addition, the amount of time needed to 
complete the Carpal-tunnel.net questionnaire 
(approximately 30 minutes) might affect the 
answers of the subjects and bias the result 
of this study. With the informed limitations 
of this study, the researcher advises that 
future studies should cover more or all 
kinds of administrative work at Dr. Hasan 
Sadikin General Hospital Bandung and it  
recommends that a further study on revealing 
the administration division with the highest 
risk for CTS should be conducted. If the 
further study would use the Carpal-tunnel.
net questionnaire, the interviewer should be 
confident that the subjects are not answering 
perfunctorily.

This study concluded that CTS occurs 
among Dr. HasanSadikin General Hospital 
Bandung administrative staff, and it amplifies 
the evidence of other literatures regarding the 
characteristics and epidemiology of CTS.

References

1. Atroshi I, Gummesson C, Johnsson R, 
Ornstein E, Ranstam J, Rosén I. Prevalence 
of carpal tunnel syndrome in a general 
population. JAMA. 1999;282(2):153–8.

2. Dale AMP, Harris-Adamson CP, Rempel 
DMD, Gerr FMD, Hegmann KMD, Silverstein 
BP, et al. Prevalence and incidence of 
carpal tunnel syndrome in US working 
populations: pooled analysis of six 
prospective studies. Scand J Work Environ 
Health. 2013;39(5):495–505.

3. Foley M, Silverstein B, Polissar N. The 
economic burden of carpal tunnel 
syndrome: long-term earnings of CTS 
claimants in Washington State. Am J Ind 
Med. 2007;50(3):155–72.

4. Giersiepen K, Spallek M. Carpal Tunnel 
Syndrome as an Occupational Disease. 
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2011;108(14):238–42.

5. Roquelaure YMD, Ha CMD, Fouquet NM, 
Descatha AMD, Leclerc AP, Goldberg MMD, 
et al. Attributable risk of carpal tunnel 
syndrome in the general population - 
implications for intervention programs 
in the workplace. Scand J Work Environ 
Health. 2009;35(5):342–8.

6. Bardeesi A, Al-Twair A, Al-Mubarek A. 
Prevalence of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome 
(CTS) among medical laboratory staff at 
King Saud University Hospitals, KSA. BMC 
Proceedings. 2015;9(Suppl 1):A55.

7. Bland JDP, Rudolfer S, Weller P.  
Prospective  analysis of the accuracy of 
diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome using  
a web-based questionnaire. BMJ Open. 
2014;4(8):1–6.

8. Naseer, Sabah A-M, Thaier A-R, Al-
Husseiny. Electrophysiological changes 
of ssymptomatic carpal tunnel syndrome 
in Patients with rheumatoid arthritis: 
frequency distribution and correlation 
to disease-related factors. Med J Babylon. 
2014;9(2):267–280.

9. Gelberman RH, Rydevik BL, Pess GM, Szabo 
RM, Lundborg G. Carpal tunnel syndrome. 
A scientific basis for clinical care. Orthop 
Clin North Am. 1988;19(1):115–24.

10. Harris-Adamson C. Biomechanical risk 
factors for carpal tunnel syndrome: a 
pooled study of 2474 workers. Occup 
Environ Med. 2014;72(1):33–41.

11. Nathan PA, Istvan JA, Meadows KD. 
A longitudinal study of predictors of 
research-defined carpal tunnel syndrome 
in industrial workers: findings at 17 years. 
J Hand Surg Br. 2005;30(6):593–8.