Vol 6 No 3 full text fix.indd


Althea Medical Journal. 2019;6(3)

115

Congenital Heart Disease Characteristics in Low Birth Weight Infants 
at Dr. Hasan Sadikin General Hospital in 2010–2014

Villia Damayantie,1 Sri Endah Rahayuningsih,2 Irvan Afriandi3
1Faculty of Medicine Universitas Padjadjaran, Indonesia, 2Department of Child Health Faculty 
of Medicine Universitas Padjadjaran/Dr. Hasan Sadikin General Hospital Bandung, Indonesia, 

3Department of Public Health Faculty of Medicine Universitas Padjadjaran, Indonesia

Correspondence: Villia Damayantie, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Padjadjaran, Jalan Raya Bandung-Sumedang 
Km.21, Jatinangor, Sumedang, Indonesia, Email: villia.damayantie@yahoo.co.id

Introduction

Congenital heart disease (CHD) accounts 
for nearly one-third of all major congenital 
anomaly and is known as one of the main 
causes of death in the first year of life. 
Congenital heart disease is defined as an 
anomaly in the macroscopic structure of the 
heart or the large blood vessel, which can cause 
functional disorders.1 Most causes of CHD are 
multi-factorial, which are a combination of 
genetic predisposition and environmental 
stimuli. Some CHD cases are associated with 
chromosomal abnormality.2 The other risk 
factors include maternal comorbidities, family 
history of CHD, being born as the first child, 
medications taken during the pregnancy, and 
the age of the mother.3 The incidence of CHD 
worldwide varies from year to year, with the 

estimation of 8 out of 1,000 (0.8%) live births. 
Several studies show that the incidence of 
CHD is more common in infants with low 
birth weight (LBW) than in the entire neonate 
population.4–6 Low birth weight is defined 
as birth weight less than 2,500 grams. The 
incidence of LBW infants is about 20.6 million 
and it accounted for 15.5% of all births globally 
and 95.6% has occurred in the developing 
countries. In Indonesia7, the prevalence of 
LBW infants is 10.2%, and 902 cases are found 
in Bandung, West Java.

A study conducted in Korea5 shows that the 
highest incidence of CHD has been found in 
a subgroup of infants born with 1,000–2,500 
grams of birth weight, which is 9.3%of the 
entire population. The most common type 
of lesions is ventricular septal defect (VSD), 
which comprises 48.9% of the total 7,245 

AMJ. 2019;6(3):115–22

Abstract

Background: Congenital heart disease (CHD) is a multifactorial disease defined as an anomaly in 
the macroscopic structure of the heart that may cause functional disorders. The incidence of CHD is 
reported higher in infants with low birth weight (LBW) than the entire population of neonates. This 
study aimed to describe the characteristics of CHD in infants born with LBW. 
Methods: This was a retrospective descriptive study with a cross-sectional design, performed in 
October–November 2015. Data were obtained from medical records of inpatients infants at Dr. 
Hasan Sadikin General Hospital, Bandung in the period of 2010–2014. The data presented were the 
characteristics of CHD in LBW infants.
Results: Of 364 LBW infants treated in the hospital within 5 years period, 21 infants (14 girls and 7 
boys) were diagnosed as CHD, with birth weight group predominantly (n18; 85.7%) in the range of 
1,500–2,499 gr. Non-cyanosis CHD was prevalent in 95.2% (n20),and patent ductus arteriosus (PDA)
was found in 76.1% (n16). Comorbid conditions mostly found in this study were preterm birth (n17), 
sepsis (n10), and neonatal hyperbilirubinemia (n9).
Conclusions: The most common type of CHD in low birth weight infants in Dr. Hasan Sadikin General 
Hospital is Patent Ductus Arteriosus. The presence of congenital heart disease should be considered in 
low birth weight infants, thus it is essential to perform screening for early recognition.

Keywords: Congenital heart disease, infants, low birth weight



Althea Medical Journal. 2019;6(3)

116     AMJ September 2019

cases.6 Lesions of CHD can lead to LBW due 
to the presence of hemodynamic disorders. 
Moreover, CHD in LBW infants may present 
with other comorbid conditions and could 
increase infant morbidity and mortality.8–13

In Indonesia, there are not many studies 
describing CHD in LBW infants, especially in 
West Java. This study aimed to describe the 
characteristics of CHD in infants born with 
LBW.

Methods

A descriptive method with cross-sectional 
research design was conducted. Data 
collections were obtained from medical 
records of hospitalized patients with CHD in 
infants born with LBW within 5-year, from 
January 2010 until December 2014. Data were 
taken from October to November 2015 from the 
Medical Records Installation of the inpatients 
of the Perinatology Room at Dr. Hasan Sadikin 
General Hospital. The study was approved by 
the Health Research Ethics Committee of Dr. 
Hasan Sadikin General Hospital. 

All data of newborn infants aged up to 
28 days with LBW who were admitted in 
the Perinatology Room at Dr. Hasan Sadikin 
General Hospital were collected (n 364). 
The inclusion criteria of this study were 
complete medical records of LBW infants aged 
0–28 days with CHD diagnosed through an 
echocardiography examination.

The selected data were categorized into four 
groups consisting of the infant characteristics, 
mother characteristics, type of CHD lesion 
that was classified into cyanosis and non-
cyanosis types of lesion, and comorbidity. In 
the infant characteristic category, the selected 
data included gender, birth weight, birthplace, 
and the 10-point Apgar score. Data on birth 
weight was categorized based on birth weight 
group of 1,500–2,499 grams, 1,000–1,499 
grams, and <1,000 grams. The Apgar score 
was divided into three categories, with 7–10 
points categorized as excellent condition, 
4–6 points as moderately depressed, and 
1–3 points as severely depressed.12 In the 
mother characteristic category, the selected 
data included mother parity, gestational age, 

 

No CHD diagnosis 
n=278 

CHD diagnosis 
n=86 

Study population: Medical Records of LBW infants 
n=364 

No Echocardiography 
n=43 

Incomplete  
Medical Records  

n=22 

Complete Medical records and 
Echocardiography 

n=21 

Suspects of CHD 

 
Incompleteresult: 

only echocardiography 
n=1 

Incomplete result: 
chest X-Ray and 

echocardiography,  
NO electrocardiography 

n=11 

Completed result: 
chest X-Ray, 

electrocardiography, and 
echocardiography 

n=9 

Figure 1 Flowchart Data Collection



Althea Medical Journal. 2019;6(3)

117Villia Damayantie et al.: Congenital Heart Disease Characteristics in Low Birth Weight Infants at Dr. Hasan 
Sadikin General Hospital in 2010–2014

frequency of antenatal care (ANC) visit, and 
medication history during the pregnancy. 
Gestational age was divided into pre-term for 
<37 weeks gestational age, a term for 37–42 
weeks gestational age, and post-term for >42 
weeks gestational age. The frequency of ANC 
visitwas divided into less than four times, and 
four times or more. In the type of CHD lesion 
category, the selected data included the type 
of lesion, both the cyanosis and non-cyanosis, 
and the presence of supporting exam results 
including chest X-ray, electrocardiography 
(ECG), and echocardiography. In the 
comorbidity condition category, the selected 
data included other diseases and other 
congenital abnormalities in the infants. The 
data were analyzed and presented in tables.

Results

There were 21 data obtained from 364 infants 
with LBW. Other 343 medical record data 
were excluded consecutively, 278 of them did 
not contain any CHD diagnosis, 22 of them 
were lost, and 43 of them were excluded 
because CHD was not confirmed through the 
echocardiography examination step. Data 
were included, only if CHD was confirmed by 
echocardiography (Figure 1).

In this study, 11 out of 21 samples were 
born in the hospital and the rest of 10 samples 
were born assisted by midwives. There were 

14 female infants and 7 male infants (Table 1).
In the birth weight group, the highest 

frequency was in those born with a birth 
weight of 1,500–2,499 grams and there was no 
infant born with a birth weight <1,000 grams 
found in this study.

The results of 1-Minute Apgar scores in 
this study were mostly found in the excellent 
category, however, there were 11 samples 
whose results of 1-minute Apgar scores were 
not recorded in their medical records (Table 
2). The results of 5-Minute Apgarscores in 
this study were mostly found in the excellent 
category, yet, there were 12 samples whose 
results of 5-minute Apgar scores were not 
recorded in their medical records. The results 
in 10-Minute Apgar scores in this study were 
mostly found in the excellent category(three 
samples). Meanwhile, there were 17 samples 
whose results of 10-minute Apgar scores were 
not recorded in their medical records.

As shown in Table 3, the highest frequency 
of parity status was multiparity mothers. 
Most of the mothers delivered the baby in the 
gestational age of fewer than 37 weeks and 
most of them had ANC visit frequency less than 
4 times. Unfortunately, only 6 of 21 mothers 
took vitamins such as iron and calcium tablets 
given by midwives or doctors at each ANC 
visit. Interestingly, only one mother received 
TT immunization during pregnancy of which 
there were 6 mothers with the first pregnancy. 

Table 2 Distribution of Apgar Scoresof  Infants with Low Birth Weight (n=21)

Apgar Scores
1-Minute 5-Minute 10-Minute
Total (n) Total (n) Total (n)

Severely depressed 2 1 -
Moderately depressed 2 2 1
Excellent condition 6 6 3
Without Information 11 12 17

Notes: 10-points APGAR score designated as Severely depressed: 1–3 points; Moderately depressed: 4–6 points;   
             Excellent condition: 7–10 points

Table 1 Distribution of Birth Weight Groups-for-Gender of Infants

Birth Weight Groups
Gender Total

(n)Male Female
1,500–2,499 grams 6 12 18
1,000–1,499 grams 1 2 3
<1,000 grams - - -
Total 7 14 21



Althea Medical Journal. 2019;6(3)

118     AMJ September 2019

However, 12 out of 21 samples did not record 
the history of medication during pregnancy in 
their medical records.

The highest frequency of CHD lesion in this 
study was non-cyanosis with patent ductus 
arteriosus (PDA) and found in 16 out of 21 
samples (Table 4). Interestingly five out of 21 

infants had more than one lesion whichwas 
PDA with a patent foramen ovale (PFO). 

The number of infants who were born with 
CHD lesion might be comorbid by the presence 
of other congenital abnormalities, such as 
Down syndrome and Labiognatapalatoschizis.
However, most of them had no other 

Table 3 The distribution of Characteristic from Maternal Factors 
Maternal Factors Total (n)

Parity
     Primiparous 6
     Multiparous 14
     Grandmultiparous 1
Gestational Age
     Preterm birth 17
     Aterm birth 4
     Post-term birth -
Frequency of Antenatal Care Visits
     <4 times 12
     ≥4 times 9
Medication History During Pregnancy 
     Herbal Medicine -
     Supplement 6
     Drugs for hypertension mother 2
     TT Immunization 1
     Without Information 12

Note: Preterm birth: <37 weeks; Aterm birth: 37–42 weeks; Post-term birth: >42 weeks. TT, tetanus toxoid

Table 4 The Distribution of Type Lesions of Congenital Heart Disease(CHD) 
Type of Lesions Amount (n)

Cyanosis CHD
   TGA 1
Non-CyanosisCHD
   ASD 2
VSD 3
   PDA>72 hours 16
Multiple Lesions
   ASD andVSD 1
   PDA andPFO 5
   VSD andPFO 1

Note: ASD: Atrial Septal Defect; PDA: Patent DuctusArteriosus; PFO: Patent Foramen Ovale; TGA: Transposition of Great 
           Arteries; VSD: Ventricular Septal Defect



Althea Medical Journal. 2019;6(3)

119Villia Damayantie et al.: Congenital Heart Disease Characteristics in Low Birth Weight Infants at Dr. Hasan 
Sadikin General Hospital in 2010–2014

Table 5 Distribution of Comorbidity
Comorbidity Total (n)

Other Congenital Abnormalities
   Down Syndrome 2
   Congenital Hypothyroid 1
Hirschsprung Disease 1
Labiognatapalatoschizis 2
   Without any congenital disorder 16
Other Diseases/Conditions
   Preterm Infants 17
   Sepsis 10
   Neonatal Hyperbilirubinemia 9
Omphalitis 5
   Pneumonia 5
   Anemia 4
   Respiratory Distress Syndrome 4
   Thrombocytopenia 4
   Hypoglycemia 3
   Small Gestational Age 3
Apneu of Prematurity 2
   Asphyxia 2
   G6PD Deficiency 2
   Dehydration 2
   Hypernatremia 2
Hyponatremia 2
   Bacterial Infection 2
   TORCH Infection 2
   Feeding Problem 2
   Bilirubin Encephalopathy 1
   Hyperkalemia 1
Hypercalcemia 1
IUGR 1
   Conjunctivitis 1
   Prolonged aPTT 1
   Phlebitis Dorsum Magnus 1
   Transient Tachypnea of Newborn 1

Note: G6PD deficiency: Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency; TORCH infection: Toxoplasmosis, Other, 
Rubella, Cytomegalovirus, and Herpes infection; IUGR: Intrauterine Growth Restriction; Prolonged aPTT: Prolonged 
activated-Partial Thromboplastin Time



Althea Medical Journal. 2019;6(3)

120     AMJ September 2019

accompanied congenital abnormalities. The 
most comorbid condition found in this study 
was preterm birth (17 out of 21) followed by 
sepsis and neonatal hyperbilirubinemia (Table 
5).

Discussion

This study describes an overview of therapeutic 
Congenital heart disease is generally caused 
by a fetal development disorder or structural 
failure in the embryogenesis process.14 The 
incidence of CHD worldwide varies from year 
to year, with the estimation of 8 out of 1,000 
(0.8%) live births.1,14 Congenital heart disease 
incidence in infants with LBW is found at a 
higher rate. Several studies have reported that 
infants with CHD are at higher risk of having 
small gestational age (SGA) condition which 
is closely related to LBW.4,5 This study found 
that 21 out of 364 LBW infants were born with 
CHD resulting in an incidence of 5.7% (Figure 
1). The study result showed that the CHD 
cases with LBW were predominantly in female 
infants (Table 1). This is consistent with a 
study, describing that the frequency of female 
infants is found higher than the male infants.6

Low birth weight defined as an infant 
with birth weightless than 2,500 grams.15 In 
Indonesia, according to the result of Basic 
Health Research (Riset Kesehatan Dasar, 
RISKESDAS) in 2013, the prevalence of infants 
born with LBW is 10.2%.7 On the other hand, 
902 infants are born with LBW in Bandung, 
West Java, while there are 438 infants born 
with LBW in Bandung Regency.16 Low birth 
weight is divided into three categories, referred 
as LBW for a birth weight ranging from 1,500–
2,499 grams, very low birth weight (VLBW) for 
birth weight ranging from 1,000–1,499 grams, 
and extremely low birth weight (ELBW) for 
birth weight ranging from less than 1,000 
grams. However, in this study, all categories 
were generally referred to as LBW. The study 
showed that CHD infants were mostly found in 
the birth weight range of 1,500–2,499 grams, 
which were 18 out of 21 samples (Table 1). 
A study conducted in Korea5 showed that 
when patients were being categorized based 
on their birth weight (≥2,500 grams, 1,000–
2,500 grams, and <1,000 grams), the highest 
CHD incidence was found in the birth weight 
subgroup of 1,000–2,500 grams, comprising 
of 9.3% (p<0.001), compared to the other two 
groups, thus the incidenceswere found higher 
in the LBW group than non-LBW.5

The birth of an infant with LBW occurs 
in those who are preterm birth or having 

intrauterine growth restriction.15 This concept 
is parallel to thestudy result that showedmost 
of the infants were born at <37 weeks of 
gestational age (Table 3). Moreover, the result 
showed someinfants had intrauterine growth 
restriction (IUGR) as a comorbid condition 
(Table 5). 

Several other factors affecting LBW include 
maternal factors, infant factors, and socio-
economic conditions. The relationship of 
mother characteristics and the incidence of 
LBW indicated significant relationships among 
pregnancy check-up of ANC, the number of 
parity, the interval between pregnancies of 
<12 months, mother weight gain, and bad 
obstetric history.17 Our study showed that the 
highest frequency of CHD infants with LBW 
was found in mothers who had more than one 
delivery, or multiparity (Table 3). Although 
other studies stated that the risk of infants 
born with LBW is threefold higher in those 
of primiparity than multiparity mother.17 The 
result of ANC visits in this study was similar 
compared to other studies, that mothers with 
less frequency of ANC visits have almost six 
times higher risk of having an LBW baby in 
comparison to mothers who have 5 or more 
ANC visits. The frequency of ANC visits is 
essential healthcare maintenance for pregnant 
women. During ANC nutritional status of the 
mother will be assessed, such a condition can 
also affect fetal nutrition. Early detection of 
congenital anomaly can be assessed through 
fetal monitoring during ANC visits. Thus, the 
less frequent mother received ANC, the risk of 
having infants LBW and/or any other anomaly 
condition will be higher.17

Since CHD is a multifactorial disease, 
a combination of genetic predisposition 
and exogenous factors such as maternal, 
gestational, and environmental conditions 
need to be considered. Some of CHD cases 
are also associated with chromosome 
abnormality, especially trisomy 21, 13, 18, and 
Turner syndrome.2 Several studies mentioned 
that the most common congenital disorder is 
Down Syndrome,3,18 in line with the result of 
this study that the most common comorbid 
congenital disorder is Down Syndrome and 
Labiognatapalatoschizis (Table 5). However, 
most of them are not accompanied by other 
congenital disorder.

Other risk factors include maternal 
comorbidities, family history of the disease, 
being born as the first child, medication 
taken during pregnancy, age of the mother, 
and gender of the infant.3 In this study, two 
mothers took hypertension and heart disease 



Althea Medical Journal. 2019;6(3)

121

medication during pregnancy (Table 3). A 
study showed that hypertension drugs may 
increase the risk of preterm birth, SGA, and 
infants suffering from an abnormality of 
cardiovascular system.19

Congenital heart disease is generally 
divided into two classes, the cyanosis, and non-
cyanosis. The cyanosis is characterized by the 
presence of central cyanosis due to the right-
to-left shunts. Some of the lesions are tetralogy 
of Fallot, transposition of the great arteries 
(TGA), and tricuspid atresia. While non-
cyanosis CHD is characterized by the presence 
of cardiac septum defect and followed by left-
to-right shunts, including VSD, ASD, or patency 
of some blood vessels that are supposed to be 
closed as in PDA. Furthermore, non-cyanosis 
CHD can also be found in an obstruction of 
the outflow tract of the ventricle like aortic 
valve stenosis, pulmonary valve stenosis, and 
coarctation of the aorta.2,20 Non-cyanosis was 
the most frequent type of lesion found in this 
study, in a ratio of 20:1 with the cyanosis one 
(Table 4).The most common lesion found 
in this study was PDA, 16 out of 21 samples, 
while TGA had the lowest frequency because it 
was only found in one out of 21 samples. Some 
of the previous studies usually excluded the 
PDA lesion due to prematurity which appears 
during <72 hours in infants who are born 
preterm. Meanwhile, in this study, samples 
with PDA were diagnosed in >72 hours in spite 
of their prematurity.

The diagnosis of congenital heart disease 
is based on anamnesis to see the risk factors 
and disease history, physical examination to 
determine the presence/absence of cyanosis 
and examination of heart sound and murmurs, 
and other supporting examinations. Basic 
supporting examinations for CHD is chest X-ray 
to see if there are any enlargement of the heart 
and vascular marking, electrocardiography 
(ECG) to see if cardiomegaly or any deviation is 
found in patients, and routine laboratory tests. 
Further supporting examinations are also 
conducted in the form of echocardiography 
and cardiac catheterization to confirm a 
CHD diagnosis. The combination of both 
examinations allow diagnosis for approaching 
one hundred percent of accuracy.2

Congenital heart disease lesion results in 
infants born with LBW due to hemodynamic 
disorders. This hemodynamic disorder can lead 
to increased metabolism, which consequently 
increases the energy consumption. A CHD 
infant cannot fulfill this increased energy 
consumption because he/she suffers from 

calorie intake impairment. This impairment 
is presumably caused by the inability of the 
body to use nutrition for metabolism due to 
malabsorption and asphyxia. Eventually, a 
manifestation will appear in the form of LBW 
and other comorbid conditions that contributed 
to the worsening state of the infants (Table 5).8 
Many infants require corrective or palliative 
surgery and hospitalization during the first 
year of life. Results of the surgery depend 
on the complexity of the lesions and infant 
characteristics such as lung development, 
prematurity, and body weight.4,13 Compared to 
infants born with normal weight, LBW infants 
with CHD who have undergone surgery are at 
higher risk of mortality and morbidity.11,13

Factors associated with CHD infant 
morbidity include LBW, prematurity and 
other conditions such as comorbid diseases. 
This study showed that the most common 
comorbid condition was preterm birth, 
followed by neonate sepsis. Moreover, 
there were metabolic disorders found, such 
as neonate hyperbilirubinemia, followed 
by pneumonia, umbilical cord infection, 
respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) and 
abnormality in blood systems such as anemia 
and thrombocytopenia.

The factors affecting mortality include a 
birth weight that is less than 1,500 grams, the 
current low body weight before surgery, and 
the Apgar score. Generally, the Apgar score 
is used to determine the level of asphyxia or 
how much apatient can lose the oxygen level 
in his/her circulation. These factors may 
determine the prognosis of a baby born with 
LBW and diagnosed CHD.12 The Apgar score in 
this study mostly belonged in a good category 
(Table 2). However, some Apgar score data 
were not recorded in the medical records, as 
the reasons were stated in the result part. As 
the Apgar score worsens, so did the infant 
prognosis, and it was marked by the increase 
in the morbidity and even mortality.

This study has several limitations; the 
study was carried out as a small regional study 
which may not reflect the actual number of the 
population. Therefore, research with a large 
number of samples is recommended. There 
were also missing and incomplete medical 
records data. Due to this, data collection from 
inpatients that were born or admitted should 
be more organized. Some Apgar scores were 
not recorded in the medical records due to two 
reasons; first, there were 10 deliveries handled 
by midwives and they did not perform the 
Apgar test post-delivery to the infants. Second, 

Villia Damayantie et al.: Congenital Heart Disease Characteristics in Low Birth Weight Infants at Dr. Hasan 
Sadikin General Hospital in 2010–2014



Althea Medical Journal. 2019;6(3)

122     AMJ September 2019

several samples already had excellent1-Minute 
Apgar score, thus, no further assessment was 
needed. 

In conclusion, the most common type of 
CHD in low birth weight infants in Dr. Hasan 
Sadikin General Hospital is Patent Ductus 
Arteriosus. The presence of congenital heart 
disease should be considered in low birth 
weight infants; thus, screening is essential for 
early recognition.

References

1. Van der Linde D, Konings EE, Slager MA, 
Witsenburg M, Helbing WA, Takkenberg JJ, 
et al. Birth prevalence of congenital heart 
disease worldwide: A systematic review 
and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 
2011;58(21):2241–7.

2. Setty HSSN, Patil SSG, Ramegowda RT, 
Vijaykumar, Vijayalakshmi IB, Manjunath 
CN. Comprehensive approach to congenital 
heart defects. J Cardiovasc Disease Res. 
2017;8(1):1–5.

3. Ul Haq F, Jalil F, Hashmi S, Jumani MI, Imdad 
A, Jabeen M, et al. Risk factors predisposing 
to congenital heart defects. Ann Pediatr 
Cardiol. 2011;4(2):117–21.

4. Malik S, Cleves MA, Zhao W, Correa A, 
Hobbs CA. Association between congenital 
heart defects and small for gestational age. 
Pediatrics. 2007;119(4):e976–82.

5. Cho SY, Oh J-H, Lee JH, Lee JY, Lee SJ, Han 
JW, et al. Recent incidence of congenital 
heart disease in neonatal care unit of 
secondary medical center: A single center 
study. Korean J Pediatr. 2012;55(7):232–7.

6. Lindinger A, Schwedler G, Hense HW. 
Prevalence of congenital heart defects 
in newborns in Germany: Results of the 
first registration year of the pan study 
(July 2006 to June 2007). Klin Padiatr. 
2010;222(5):321–6.

7. Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan 
Kesehatan Kementerian Kesehatan 
Republik Indonesia. Riset kesehatan 
dasar. Jakarta: Badan Penelitian dan 
Pengembangan Kesehatan Kementerian 
Kesehatan Republik Indonesia; 2013.

8. Hagau N, Culcitchi C. Nutritional support 
in children with congenital heart disease. 
Nutr Ther Metabol. 2010;28(4):172–84

9. Maramis PP, Kaunang ED, Rompis J. 
Hubungan penyakit jantung bawaan 

dengan status gizi pada anak di RSUP Prof. 
Dr. Rd Kandou Manado tahun 2009–2013. 
eCl. 2014;2(2):1–8.

10. Alam A, Sukadi A, Risan NA, Dhamayanti 
M. Preterm and low birth weight as risk 
factors for infant delayed development. 
Paediatr Indones. 2008;48(1):1–4.

11. Ades AM, Dominguez TE, Nicolson SC, 
Gaynor JW, Spray TL, Wernovsky G, et al. 
Morbidity and mortality after surgery for 
congenital cardiac disease in the infant 
born with low weight. Cardiology in the 
Young. 2010;20(1):8–17.

12. Dimmick S, Walker K, Badawi N, Halliday 
R, Cooper SG, Nicholson IA, et al. Outcomes 
following surgery for congenital heart 
disease in low-birthweight infants. J 
Paediatr Child Health. 2007;43(5):370–5.

13. Lechner E, Wiesinger-Eidenberger 
G, Weissensteiner M, Hofer A, Tulzer 
G, Sames-Dolzer E, et al. Open-heart 
surgery in premature and lowbirthweight 
infants–a single-centre experience. Eur J 
Cardiothorac Surg. 2009;36(6):986–91.

14. Bernier PL, Stefanescu A, Samoukovic 
G, Tchervenkov CI. The challenge of 
congenital heart disease worldwide: 
Epidemiologic and demographic facts. 
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Pediatr 
Card Surg Annu  2010;13(1):26–34.

15. Goldenberg RL, Culhane JF. Low birth 
weight in the United States. Am J Clin Nutr. 
2007;85(2):584S–90S.

16. Departemen Kesehatan Provinsi Jawa 
Barat. Profil kesehatan Provinsi Jawa 
Barat tahun 2012. Bandung: Departemen 
Kesehatan Provinsi Jawa Barat;2012.

17. Negi K, Kandpal S, Kukreti M. 
Epidemiological factors affecting low birth 
weight. JK Science. 2006;8(1):31–4

18. Freeman SB, Bean LH, Allen EG, Tinker 
SW, Locke AE, Druschel C, et al. Ethnicity, 
sex, and the incidence of congenital 
heart defects: A report from the national 
down syndrome project. Genet Med. 
2008;10(3):173–80.

19. Lennestål R, Olausson PO, Källén B. 
Maternal use of antihypertensive drugs 
in early pregnancy and delivery outcome, 
notably the presence of congenital heart 
defects in the infants. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 
2009;65(6):615–25.

20. Meberg A. Congenital heart defects through 
30 years. OJPed. 2012;2(3):219–227.