




































Copyright © CC-BY-NC 2019, CRIBFB | AESR 

                       American Economic & Social Review; Vol. 5, No. 1; 2019 

                                       ISSN 2576-1269 E-ISSN 2576-1277 

Research Article               Published by Centre for Research on Islamic Banking & Finance and Business, USA 

 

     1 
 

Influence of Bank Credits on the Nigerian Economy 
 

 

 

Idachaba Odekina Innocent 

Department of Banking and Finance 

Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Kaduna State, Nigeria 

Email: innocentdaniel4grace@gmail.com 

Tel: +234 18633840 

 

Olukotun G. Ademola 
Department of Banking and Finance 

Kogi State University, Anyigba, Kogi State, Nigeria 

Email: olukgaby@yahoo.com         

Tel: +234 8062995674 

 

Elam Wunako Glory 

Department of Banking and Finance 

Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Kaduna State, Nigeria 

Email: elamglory5@gmail.com 

Tel: +234 7066480216 

 

 

Abstract 

The aim of this study is to examine the influence of bank credits on the Nigerian economy using time series data 

covering the period from 1980 to 2017.Gross domestic product was used as proxy for the economy while credits to 

the private sector, public sector and prime lending rate were used as proxies of Banks credits. Unit root test was used 

to test stationary which reveals that all the variables were stationary at first difference. The regression analysis result 

shows that credit to the private sector have positive effect on Nigerian economy while credit to public sector and 

prime lending rate have negative effect on the Nigerian economy. The result of co-integration test presented reveals 

that there exist among the variables co-integration which means long-run analysis. It is recommended that, policy 

makers should focus attention on long-run policies to promote economic growth such as development of modern 

banking sector, efficient financial market, infrastructures. 

  
Keywords:  Financial institutions, Bank credits, Economic Growth, Economic Development , Resources 

 

1. Introduction 

Globally banks in developing countries are expected to play vital and effective roles in financing their economic 

projects and activities as their contributions in ensuring sustainable economic growth and development. As financial 

institutions, banks perform intermediation roles by allowing funds to be channeled from people who might not put 

them to productive use to people who will definitely do so within an economy. The intermediary roles of bank can 

foster economic growth through rising of savings, improving efficiency of loan-able funds and promoting capital 

accumulation. The importance of bank credit in developing economy has been acknowledge in Schumpeter (1934) 

who argue that banking sector facilitate technological innovation through their intermediary role. He emphasized on 

the efficient allocation of savings through identification and funding of entrepreneur as well as implementation of 

innovative production processes that are the main tools in order to achieve real economic performance. In the same 
vein, Shaw (1967) and McKinnon (1973) also agreed the fact that financial development facilitates economic 

growth by increasing savings, efficient allocation and investment of financial resources. These studies further 

explained that development of financial markets is an essential condition for rapid economic growth. The level of 

development and sophistication of a country's financial sectors could be relied on as one of the valuable indicators of 

economic growth.  

Sustaining economic development has been the paramount objective of all successive government in the country 

since Nigeria independence in 1960. This led to the implementation of several national development plans and 

programmes aimed at boosting productivity and diversifying the economic base. The agenda necessitates the 



Copyright © CC-BY-NC 2019, CRIBFB | AESR 

www.cribfb.com/journal/index.php/aesr                                       American Economic & Social Review                                             Vol. 5, No. 1; 2019 

 

2 
                           

intervention of financial sectors especially banking industry by providing financial resources for large scale 

production of industries and provision of other credit facilities within the economy. The role of financial 

intermediation in sustaining economic development cannot be over-emphasized; the development of this sector 

determines how it can effectively and efficiently discharge its major role of mobilizing fund from the surplus unit to 

the deficit unit within the economy.  

According to Adekunle, Salami and Adedipe (2013), a well-developed financial system plays several roles to boost 
efficiency of intermediation through reduction of information, transaction and monitoring costs. It will also enhance 

investment by identifying and funding good business opportunities, mobilizes savings, encourage trading, hedging 

and diversification of risk as well as facilitating exchange of goods and services. All these resulted in more efficient 

allocation of resources, accumulation of physical and human capital and faster technological progress, which in turn 

leads to economic growth.  

The attempt to strengthen the private sector (manufacturing sector inclusive) by the government led to the 

implementation of financial liberalisation policy in 1986 as part of the Structural Adjustment Programme (SAP). 

The Structural Adjustment Programme (SAP) was an economic reform programme aimed at restructuring the 

economy and averting economic collapse. The key objectives of SAP are to lay the basis for sustaining non-

inflationary or minimal inflationary growth and improve the efficiency of the public and private sectors. Therefore, 

the financial liberalization (reform) policy entails the provision of an appropriate legal and regulatory framework for 

effective private participation in the economy.  
The country also adopted a medium-term strategy, called the National Economic Empowerment and Development 

Strategy (NEEDS) in 2004, as a response to the numerous challenges facing the nation. Recently, the government 

approved vision 20-2020 for transforming the country into a modern economy, among the 20 leading countries in 

the world by 2020 (The Times of Nigeria 2008). The objective of the vision 20-2020 is in line with various studies 

and projections by Goldman Sachs that Nigeria will be the 20th and 12th largest economy of the World by 2025 and 

2050 respectively ahead of Italy, Canada, Korea, among others(Skyscraper City 2006), and Africa biggest economy 

by 2050 (Business Economy, 2008). The vision 2020 is to be realized through the growth of the private sector.  

However, as Solanke (2007) argued, the state of the private sector, its characteristics, disposition and resilience 

would determine in substantial respects how far the lofty objectives of repositioning Nigeria’s economy can be 

achieved. Accordingly, the Nigeria government has also adopted the public private partnership (PPP) strategy. PPP 

schemes are designed to lead to dramatic improvement in quality, availability and cost-effectiveness of services. 
These include Service Contracts; Management Contracts; Leases; Build, Operate and Transfer; and Concessions. As 

a compliment to the various programmes of the government to accelerate the rate of growth of the economy, it has 

been suggested that the level of dependence on the oil sector should be reduced, while concentration should be on 

the manufacturing, energy, transport and agriculture (Hale, 2002). This means that efficient allocation of funds to 

the real sector have high tendency of improving the economy. 

In the mid-80s, the direct control of credit allocation and regulated interest rate structure was used to channel banks 

credit to the real sectors of the economy by that arrangement, banks were statutorily required to allocate most of the 

loan-able funds to the key sectors like agriculture, manufacturing, sold minerals, housing at low rate of interest 

which would result in high investments and outputs and invariably growth of the domestic economy, however, the 

weakness that characterized the policy in September 1986 to eliminate inefficiency and enhance effective 

mobilization and utilization of resources which ultimately would translate to a sound and stable banking system. 

Hence, the Central Bank of Nigeria has made concerted effort via several banks reforms especially from the wake of 
last decade through effective surveillance and prudential guidelines, a more stringent procedure for licensing and 

increase in the capitalization base among others to ensure a sound and stable banking system capable of providing 

effective intermediation that would stimulate growth, encourage medium and long-term lending to the real sectors 

capable of diversifying the productive base of the economy (Iwedi & Igbanibo 2015). It would be recalled that the 

banking crisis in Nigeria in the 1990s was associated with sharp increases in interest rate, large currency 

depreciation and devaluation and lasting decline in the supply of credit. It is worth knowing that access to bank 

credit allows firms to increase production, output and efficiency and in turn increases the profitability of banks 

through interest earned and improves economic growth (Adeniyi 2015). 

Abubakar and Gani, (2013) also agreed that the real sector in Nigeria still face difficulty in the accessibility of 

financial resources especially from the commercial banks that hold about 90% of the total financial sector assets and 

high rate of interest rate causing many firms to avoid bank-borrowing. Other formidable financing challenges 
include concentration of bank credit to the oil and gas, communication and general commerce sectors to the 

disadvantage of the core real sectors such as agriculture and manufacturing sectors. Also, banks are more disposed 

to financing government financial need as almost 50% of their assets are tied up by government debt.  



Copyright © CC-BY-NC 2019, CRIBFB | AESR 

www.cribfb.com/journal/index.php/aesr                                       American Economic & Social Review                                             Vol. 5, No. 1; 2019 

 

3 
                           

Basically, the Nigerian commercial banks dominate the financial sector and account for a large proportion (above 

90%) of transactions within the system. This is measured as percentage of total assets of the commercial banks to 

other financial institutions within the system. The above clearly shows that the deposit money banks dominate the 

Nigerian banking scene. It therefore becomes very important to study the effectiveness of these banks on the 

Nigerian economy. There has been a renewed interest globally into the study of credit and its ability to generate 

growth and the position of this country makes it somehow important to see the contribution of the financial sector to 
the spate of growth within the economy. This study shall examine the influence of bank credit on the Nigeria 

economy using credit to private sector, credit to public sector and prime lending rate as the  independent variables 

while real gross domestic products as dependent variables. 

Series of empirical studies has been conducted on the subject matter from both developed and developing countries 

for example; (Akpansung, 2011; Murty, Sailaja & Dismissie, 2012; Muhsin & Eric, 2000; Mishra, Das & Pradhan 

2009; Aliero, Abdullahi & Adamu, 2013; Hassan, Sanchez & Yu, 2011; Eatzaz & Malik, 2009; Debray, 2003; 

Aurangzeb, 2012; Ekpenyong & Ikechukwo, 2011;). However, some studies found positive relationship between 

commercial bank credit and the economy (Ahmed, 2008; Akpansung and Babalola 2011; Aurangzeb, 2012;) among 

others, while others found a negative relationship between commercial bank credit and economy (Nuno, 2012; 

Debray, 2003; Ekpenyong & Ikechukwo, 2011; Hassan et al. (2011), Levine (1997) and Levine, Loayza & Beck, 

2000). However, the divergence in previous findings may be attributed to differences in methodologies, economic 

factors and time frame among others. In the same way, the study by Mushin and Eric (2000) showed that the effect 
runs from economic growth to financial development and not otherwise. 

Atseye, Edim and Ezeaku (2015) highlight that despite the fact that credit influences the economy there still remains 

a gap in understanding the causal relationship between commercial bank credit and its impact in developing 

economies. The influence of such types of credit on economic growth has received little attention from researchers. 

Admitting the existence of such gap, Tuuli (2002) states that of course there have been a few empirical findings on 

the determinants of growth in developing economies, but the relationship between bank credit and the economy has 

however been neglected. For this reason, the need to fill this gap necessitated this empirical study on the Nigerian 

case. 

This study will be able to answer the following empirical questions; does bank credit to the private sector affect the 

Nigerian economy? Does bank credit to the public sector affect the Nigerian economy? Does prime lending rate of 

bank credit influence the Nigerian economy? 
The study sought to achieve the following specific objectives: to determine how bank credits to the private sector 

affects the Nigerian economy, to determine how bank credits to the public sector affects the Nigerian economy and 

to establish the extent to which prime lending rate of commercial bank credits affect the Nigerian economy. 

The outline of the study is as follows: section one discussed the introduction of the paper, section two discussed the 

literature review, section three outlines the methodology, section four presents the data analysis and discussion of 

results and lastly, section five recommendations and conclusion  

2. Literature Review 

2.1 Concept of Economic Growth 

According to Dewett (2005) as cited in Nwanyanwu (2010), economic growth is an increase in the net national 

product in a given period of time.  He explained that economic growth is generally referred to as a quantitative 

change in economic variables, normally persisting over successive periods.  He added that determinants of economic 

growth are availability of natural resources, the rate of capital formation, capital-output ratio, technological progress, 
dynamic entrepreneurship and other factors.  

2.2 Concept of Bank Credits 
CBN briefs (2003) define bank credits as the amount of loans and advances given by the banking sector to the 

various economic agents. CBN Monetary policy circular (2010) identifies such bank credit facilities to include 

loans, advances, commercial papers, bankers’ acceptance, bill discounted with a bank credit risk. Bank credit is 

often accomplished with some collateral that helps to ensure the repayment of the loan in the event of default. Credit 

channels savings into productive investment thereby encouraging economic growth. According to Nzotta (2004), it 

is generally accepted that bank credits influence positively the level of economic activities in any country; it 

influences what is to be produced, who produces it and quantity to be produced. 

Bank credit affects and alters the level of money supply in an economy or country. It is the most important source of 

bank income and it promotes the activities of banks and non-bank financial institution and this influences the level 
of growth of production, the level of entrepreneurship and the realization of aggregate economic performance, 

development and growth. It could thus be said with absolute assurance that banking industry credit is of crucial 

importance both to the bank, the monetary authorities, business community and the economy in general. 



Copyright © CC-BY-NC 2019, CRIBFB | AESR 

www.cribfb.com/journal/index.php/aesr                                       American Economic & Social Review                                             Vol. 5, No. 1; 2019 

 

4 
                           

Credit to private sector, credit to public sector and prime lending are used as independent variables for this study for 

the following reasons; One of the indications or signs (but not the only one), of economic development and 

prosperity is the development and increasing share (role) of private and public sector in the national economy or 

GDP of a certain country. Referring to data from the world Bank, an economic measure of so called domestic credit 

to private sector ( % to GDP ) means that financial resources like loans and non equity securities are provided to the 

private sector by financial institutions like banks and other financial corporation’s all measured as percentages with 
respect to GDP ( or national size of economy) . The higher this measure is, the higher financial resources or 

financing is to private sector in a country and so the greater opportunity and space for the private sector to develop 

and grow. The better the private sector gets and bigger role it has in national economy, the better is generally the 

health and development of the economy of this country. More so, public sector credit are needed to stimulate 

economic growth in spite of the deficiencies shown overtime in the public sector credit, private sector credit has 

been a good predictor of economic growth  

2.3 Empirical Literature review 
Most scholars have agreed that there is relationship between bank credit and economic growth. However, scholars 

have differed on the direction of causality between bank credit and economic growth (Oluitan, 2009). In order to 

examine the relationships that exist between bank credit and economic growth, previous studies have used several 

analytical approaches. 

Modebe, Ugwuegbe and Ugwuoke (2014) investigated the impact of bank credit on the growth of Nigerian economy 
for the period of 1986-2012; the result of the OLS regression showed that there is a negative and significant 

relationship between GDP and TBCPS in the long run. M2 which was used as control variable has a positive and 

significant impact on GDP at the long run. The short run dynamics of the variables indicates that TBCPS also have a 

negative and insignificant impact on GDP at the short-run. The result of the granger causality test reviles that 

causation runs from GDP to TBCPS and not the other way round, a case of unidirectional causality. The result also 

showed bidirectional causality between TBCPS and M2. Evaluating the relationship between financial development 

and economic growth (Eatzaz & Malik, 2009) found that bank credits to the private sector significantly increase the 

productivity of workers (output per worker) and as such, facilitates long-run economic growth with respect to 

Nigeria. In the same way, study by (Aliero, Abdullahi & Adamu, 2013) over the period 1974-2010 examined the 

impact of bank credit on economic growth. The result from Autoregressive distributed lag bound approach showed 

that private sector had significant positive effect on economic growth in Nigeria. Kiran, Yavus and Guris (2009) 
apply ratios of bank credits to the GDP and private sector credit to the GDP and find a positive and statistically 

significant relationship between bank credits and economic growth. Murty, Sailaya and Demissie (2012) by using 

multivariate Johansen co integration approach examined the long run impact of the bank credit on economic growth 

of Ethiopia. The study found a significant long-run relationship between bank credits and economic growth in 

Ethiopia. Nuno (2012) applies a dynamic panel data (GMM-System Estimator) technique to evaluate the nexus 

between bank credits and economic growth in the European Union. The study found that savings promotes growth 

while inflation and bank credits negatively impacts on economic growth. Akpansung and Babalola (2011) found 

significant long-run relationship between private sector bank credits and economic growth in Nigeria. The causality 

runs from GDP to private sector bank credits and also from industrial production to GDP, lending rate are found to 

impede economic growth. Hassan, Sanchez and Yu (2011) assert that rapid bank credit expansion negatively 

impacts on economic growth. The studies argue that rapid and uncontrolled expansion in bank credits has the 

tendency to discourage domestic savings and investments. Mulhsin and Eric (2000) carried out a study on Turkish 
economy; it was found that bank deposits, private sector credit or domestic credit ratios are alternatively used as 

proxies for financial development; causality runs from economic growth to financial development. Their conclusion 

was that growth seems to lead financial sector development. Shittu (2012) adopted unit root test, co-integration and 

error correction model to examine the impact of financial intermediation on economic growth in Nigeria, the study 

conclude that credit through deposit is a determinant of economic growth in Nigeria. This is in agreement with the 

study of Yakubu and Affoi (2014) which conclude that commercial banks credit impacts positively and significantly 

on the economic growth of Nigeria. Ogege and Boloupremo (2014) employ ADF, Johansen co-integration and 

ECM, the study concludes that only credit allocated to production sector is having a significant positive effect on 

growth.  Akpansung & Babalola (2009), examined the impact of bank credit on the growth of Nigerian economy for 

the period of 1970-2008, using two-stage least square and granger causality test, the result indicates that bank credit 

has a negative impact on the growth of Nigerian economy with causation running from GDP to bank credit. 
Marshal, Igbanibo and Onuegbu (2015) did study in Nigeria and found strong positive correlation between banks 

credit and GDP and concluded that there is unidirectional relationship running from GDP to banking sector credit. 

Orji, A. (2012) investigated the determinants of bank savings in Nigeria as well as examined the impact of bank 

savings and bank credits on Nigeria’s economic growth from 1970- 2006. The empirical results showed a positive 

http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/FS.AST.PRVT.GD.ZS
http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/FS.AST.PRVT.GD.ZS


Copyright © CC-BY-NC 2019, CRIBFB | AESR 

www.cribfb.com/journal/index.php/aesr                                       American Economic & Social Review                                             Vol. 5, No. 1; 2019 

 

5 
                           

relationship exists between the lagged values of total private savings, private sector credit, public sector credit, 

interest rate spread, exchange rates and economic growth.  

2.4 Theoretical Framework 

Few theories on credit have been propounded by scholars but for the purpose of this study, the Quantitative Easing 

theory propounded by Richard Andreas Werner was used to explain banking system credit. Richard Andreas Werner 

is a monetary and development economist, he proposed the term Quantitative Easing as well as the expression 
“QE2” referring to the need to implement true quantitative easing as an expansion in credit creation. He has 

developed a theory of money creation called the quantity theory of credit which is in line with Schumpeter’s credit 

of money. Werner has argued since 1992 that the banking sector needs to be reflected appropriately in the 

macroeconomic models since it is the main creator and allocator of the money supply, through the purpose of credit 

creation by individual banks. 

3. Methodology 

The aim of the research is to examine the effect of bank credits (such as credit to private sector, credit to public 

sector and prime lending rate) on the Nigerian economy (proxied by GDP) using annual data covering the period 

from 1980 to 2017. 

3.1 Research Design 

This study employed correlational research design. The choice of this research design is due to the time series nature 

of the data collected from the period 1980-2017, this types of research design studies the relationship between the 
dependent variable and independent variables. 

3.2 Study Data 

Study of this nature demands the use of time series secondary data, relating to each of the study’s variables – gross 

domestic product, credits to private sector, credits to public sector and prime lending rate, spanning a period of 37 

years (1980-2017). All data regarding the variables were obtained from the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) 

statistical bulletin and National Bureau of Statistics of various years under study 

3.3Empirical model 

The regression technique is an important tool in econometrics. In general, a regression is concerned with examining 

the linkages between a given variable and one or more other variables. It is an attempt to describe changes in a 

variable. It is an attempt to describe changes in variables by reference to changes in other variables. The regression 

model is stated as 
R= ∞ +B1X1+ B2X2+-----------BxXx  +ɛ ……………………………. (1) 

This regression model can be interpreted whether a set of bank credits factors has a linkage with economic growth, 

where R is economic growth proxies by GDP and X’s represents the bank credit variables used in this study. ∞ is the 

intercept of the regression that is, constant term, B1-Bx are the coefficient of variables, and ɛ is the error term.The 

model was modified as follows; 

Log GDP = ∞ +B1 Log CPS + B2 Log CPR + B3 Log PLR + ɛ ……………………………… (2) 

These variables were so chosen because they are majorly the key sectors that could spur economic development. As 

such, their positive contribution should lead to increase in Gross Domestic Product (GDP). 

 

Table 1: Operational definition of the variables and prior expectation 

VARIABLES MEASUREMENT SOURCE EXPECTATION 

GDP Real GDP at constant price CBN statistical bulletin NIL 

CPS Credits to private sector by 

banks 

CBN statistical bulletin  Positive 

CPR Credits to public sector by 

banks 

CBN statistical bulletin Positive 

PLR Prime Lending Rate CBN statistical bulletin Negative 

Source: Researchers’ Compilation, 2018 

4. Presentation and Discussion of Results 

Table 2: Summary result of Stationarity Test 

Variables 1st Difference (P-value) Null Hypothesis Integration Order 

Log GDP 0.0000 Rejected 1(1) 

Log CPS 0.0009 Rejected 1(1) 

Log CPR 0.0000 Rejected 1(1) 

Log PLR 0.0000 Rejected 1(1) 

Source: computation of result summary from E-view 10 student edition output. 



Copyright © CC-BY-NC 2019, CRIBFB | AESR 

www.cribfb.com/journal/index.php/aesr                                       American Economic & Social Review                                             Vol. 5, No. 1; 2019 

 

6 
                           

From the result, all the study variables are stationary after differencing once (P-values less than 5% significant 

level), this indicates that the variables are all integrated of order 1(1), a necessary and compulsory pre-condition for 

the use of VECM, at the first difference where the variables are stationary. 

4.1 Optimal Lag Selection 

In the adoption of econometrics approach such as co-integration test and VECM estimation, the choice of optimal 

Lag is non-negotiable for a reliable result. Optimal Lag selection can be done with the aid of several criteria 
individually or combined such as Final Prediction Error (FPE), Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), Schwarz 

Information Criterion (SIC). The AIC is adopted by this study because according to (Sarah, 2008), it yields better 

results. According to AIC selection Criterion, the lower the test statistics, the better the model, this study therefore 

selecting optimum lag of 2. 

4.2 Co-integration Test 

This is an important analysis that helps to test for a long-run stable relationship among the variables of interest in a 

study, when a linear combination of variables that is of order 1(1) produces a stationary series than the variables 

may need to be co-integrated (Olokoyo, 2011). 

 

Table 3: Trace Statistics and Max-Eigen Co-integration Test 

Unrestricted Co-integrated Rank Test (Trace)        

Hypothesized  

No. CE(s) 

Eigen Value Trace 

Statistics 

0.05 Critical 

Value 

Prob. Max-

Eigen 

Statistics 

0.05 

Critical 

Value 

Prob. 

None* 0.926858 117.7923 47.85613 0.0000 86.30680 27.58434 0.0000 

At most 1* 0.505747 31.48553 29.79707 0.0317 23.25536 21.13162 0.0248 

At most 2 0.148484 8.230172 15.49471 0.4411 5.304336 14.26460 0.7030 

At most 3 0.084845 2.925836 3.841466 0.0872 2.925836 3.841466 0.0872 

Trace test indicates two cointegrating equations at the 0.05 level     

Source: Output from Eview 10 Student Edition 

 

From Table 3 above, both trace and max-eigen criteria agree on the existence of a number of co-integrating 

equations, which is another necessary pre-condition for the estimation of VECM. The trace and max Eigen value 

suggested 2 co-integrating equations at the 5% significant level. These results imply that the variables of the study in 

the long run move together. 

4.3 Vector Error Correction Model Estimates 
With the variables confirmed to be integrated of order 1(1), optimal lag 2 selection made and results of co-

integration recommending two co-integrating equation, the estimation of the VECM, using the ordinary least square 

method to establish the influence of bank credit on the Nigerian economy. The results of the VECM are summarized 

in Table 4. 

Table 4: Vector Error Correction Estimates 

Variables Coefficient Standard Error t-statistics 

Log C 0.215603 0.08551 2.52150 

Log CPS 0.037639 0.27170 0.13853 

Log CPR -0.141843 0.24555 -0.57765 

Log PLR -15467.28 106279 -0.14553 

R-square 0.769828 

Adj. R-square 0.665204 

F-statistics 7.358058 
ECM (-1) -10.454 

Source: Output from Eview 10 Student Edition 

  

From the regression results in the Table 4 above, the adjusted R2 is 0.665204. This shows that independent variables 

(Log CPS, Log CPR and Log PLR) specified in the model explained only about 66.52% of the variations in the 

dependent variables (Log GDP) over the observed years while the remaining 33.48% are explained by all other 

factors that are not included in our model estimates. 

The ECT (error correction term) or the speed of adjustment towards long run equilibrium with the value given as 

104.54, the implication of this is that whenever there are deviations on the Nigerian economy (measured by GDP) 

from an equilibrium path, the model corrects itself at the rate of 104.54% annually. Long run causality from the 



Copyright © CC-BY-NC 2019, CRIBFB | AESR 

www.cribfb.com/journal/index.php/aesr                                       American Economic & Social Review                                             Vol. 5, No. 1; 2019 

 

7 
                           

three explanatory variables (CPS, CPR, and PLR) to the criterion variable (GDP) is deemed to have arisen where the 

ECT is both significant and the sign preceding it is negative. The result in table 4 indicates that ECT is negative, in 

other words there is a long run causality running from the bank credits to the Nigerian economy. 

The coefficient of credit to private sector (Log CPS) is 0.037639. This shows credit to private sector has positive 

influence on Nigerian economy measured by Log GDP. The result reveals that credit to private sector has significant 

influence on the economy given the value of t-statistic (0.13853< 1.96) at two tails. The finding further shows that a 
unit percent increase in credit to private sector will bring about 3.7639% increase in GDP holding all other factors 

constant. This finding is in line with the work of (Aliero, Abdullahi & Adamu, 2013) (Orji, 2012).   

The coefficient of credit to public sector (Log CPR) is -0.141843. This shows public sector credit has negative 

influence on Nigerian economy measured by Log GDP. It also revealed that credit to public sector has insignificant 

influence on the Nigerian economy, given the value of t-statistic (-0.57765<1.96) at two tails. The finding further 

shows that a unit percent increase in credit to public sector will bring about 14.1843% decrease in GDP holding all 

other factors constant. This finding is in line with the work of (Ibrahim, Akano & Kazeem, 2015). 

The coefficient of prime lending rate (Log PLR) -15467.28 shows that prime lending rate has influence of about 

15467.28% on the Nigerian economy measured by GDP during the observed years. This implies that a unit percent 

increase in prime lending rate will bring about 1546% decreases in the economy measured by GDP. This finding is 

in line with the work of (Akpansung & Babalola, 2011). The result further shows that tabulated t-statistic (-

0.14553<1.96) less than calculated value at 5% level of significance. 
 

Table 5:  Summary of Diagnostic test 

Test P-value Centered VIF 

VIF  2.85, 2.94, 1.21 

Jarque-Bera 0.29  

Source: Output from Eview 10 Student Edition 

The variance inflation factor was performed to support the validity of the regression results. Since the values 2.85, 

2.94 and 1.21 are less than 5, it was therefore concluded that there were no multicollinearity among the variables of 

the model. 

Jarque-Bera test was used to check for the normality of the data. The result shows that the study data are normally 
distributed given the p-value greater than 5% significance level. 

5. Recommendations and Conclusion 
Credit is an important link in monetary transmission as it finances production, consumption and capital formation, 

which in turn affect economic growth. Especially in developing countries like Nigeria, it caters resources need for 

economic growth. The Central Bank of Nigeria and the government have adopted many links and programs to 

increase economic growth through the use of bank credit. However, the relationships between private sector credit, 

public sector credit, prime lending rate and economic growth have not yet been assessed properly in the Nigeria 

context.  

Applying regression approach, the study found that the bank credit to private sector have positive influence on 

Nigeria economy while public sector credit and prime lending rate have negative influence on Nigeria economy and 

also exhibit two cointegration relationship i.e. long run relationship among the variables under study. The empirical 
results imply that, policy makers should focus attention on long-run policies to promote economic growth such as 

development of modern banking sector, efficient financial market, infrastructures so as to increase private sector 

credit and public sector credit which are instrumental to promote growth in the long-run. 

References 

Abubakar, A., & Gani, I. M. (2013). Impact of banking sector development on economic growth: Evidence from 

Nigeria. Journal of Business Management & Social Sciences Research (JBM&SSR), 2 (4), 47- 59. 

Atseye, F. A., Edim, N. O., and Ezeaku, H. C. (2015). An Empirical Investigation of the Impact of Bank Credit on 

Economic Growth in Nigeria. Indian Journal of Applied Research, 5, Issue 11. 

Akpansung, A. O. & Babalola, S. J. (2011). Banking Sector Credit and Economic Growth in Nigeria: An Empirical 

Investigation, CBN Journal of Applied Statistics, Vol. 2, No. 2. Pp. 51-62. 

Akpansung, A. O. & , M. O.(2009). Recent Banking Reform in Nigeria: Implication on Sectoral Credit Allocation 

and Economic Growth, International Journal of Business and Social Science. Vol. 5, No. 13 (Dec) Pp.91. 
Adekunle, O. A., Salam, G. O., & Adedipe, O. A. (2013). Impact of financial sector development on the Nigerian 

economic growth. American Journal of Business and Management, 2 (4), 347- 356. 

Azege, M. (2007). The impact of financial intermediation on economic growth: The Nigerian perspective. Research 

Paper, Department of Economics, Lagos State University 



Copyright © CC-BY-NC 2019, CRIBFB | AESR 

www.cribfb.com/journal/index.php/aesr                                       American Economic & Social Review                                             Vol. 5, No. 1; 2019 

 

8 
                           

Aliero, H. M., Abdullahi, Y. Z. & Adamu, N. (2013). Private Sector Credit and Economic Growth Nexus in Nigeria: 

An Autoregressive Distributed Lag Bound Approach, Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, Vol. 4, No. 

1, (Jan) Doi:10.5901/mjss.2013.V4nlp83. 

Ahmed, A. D. (2008). Financial Liberalization, Financial Development and Growth in Sub-Saharan Africa’s 

Economic Reform: An Empirical Investigation, Centre for Strategic Economic Studies, Victoria University, 

Austria.  
Aurangzeb (2012). Contribution of banking sector in economic growth: A case of Pakistan. Economics and Finance 

review volume 2 (6). 

Boyreau-Debray, G. (2003) “Financial Intermediation and Growth – Chinese Style.” Policy Research Working 

Paper 3027, The World Bank. 

Central Bank of Nigeria (2003), CBN Briefs, 2008-2009 Edition, Research Department, CBN, Abuja 

CBN report (2010). Central Bank of Nigeria monetary policy circular. 

Dewett, K. K. (2005). Modern Economic Theory. New Delhi: Shyan Lal Charitable Trust. 

Eatzaz, A. & Malik, A. (2009). Financial Sector and Economic Growth: An Empirical Analysis of Developing 

Countries, Journal of Economic Cooperation and Development, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 17-40. 

Ekpenyong B. & Ikechukwu A. (2011): Banks and Economic growth in Nigeria, European Journal of Business and 

Management. 

Hassan, M. K., Sanchez, B. & Yu, S. J. (2011). Financial Development and Economic Growth: New evidence from 
panel data. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 51(1), 88-104. DOI: 

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2010.09.001. 

Hale, B. ‘Nigeria’s economy dominated by Oil’. BBC News January, 16, 2002 

Ibrahim, A.O.B., Akano A.I & Kazeem H.S. (2015) To What Extent Does Banks’ Credit Stimulate Economic 

Growth? Evidence from Nigeria. JORIND 13(1) pp. 128-139. 

Kıran, B., N.C. Yavuz and B. Guriş (2009), “Financial Development and Economic Growth: A Panel Data Analysis 

of Emerging Countries,” International Research Journal of Finance and Economics 30, pp.87-94.  

Koivu, Tuuli. (2002). "Do efficient banking sectors accelerate economic growth in transition Countries," Bank of 

Finland, Institute for Economies in Transition, BOFIT Discussion Papers 14. 

Levine R. (1997), “Financial and Growth: Theory and Evidence” in the handbook of Economic Growth the Nether 

lands: Elsevier Science Press. 
Levine, R., Loayza, N. & Beck, T., (2000) “Financial Intermediation and Economic growth: Causes and Causality” 

Journal of Monetary Economics, vol. 46, p.31-77. 

Murty, K.S., K. Sailaja and W.M. Dimissie (2012.) "The Long-Run Impact of Bank Credit on Economic Growth in 

Ethiopia: Evidence from the Cointegration Approach", European Journal of Business and Management Vol 

4, No. 14.  

Marshal, I., Igbanibo, D.S. and Onuegbu, O.(2015) Causality modeling of the banking sector credits and economic 

growth in Nigeria. IIARD International Journal of Banking & Finance Res 1(7):1–12. 

Mishra, P.K., K.B. Das and B.B. Pradhan 2009. "Credit Market Development and Economic Growth in India", 

Middle Eastern Finance and Economics. 

Mckinnon, R. I. (1973). Money and capital in economic development. Washington D.C: Brookings Institute 

Muhsin, K. & Eric, J. P. (2000). “Financial Development and Economic Growth in Turkey: Further Evidence on the 

Causality Issue” Centre for International, Financial and Economics Research Department of Economics 
Loughborough University 

Modebe, N. J., Ugwuegbe, S. U. & Ugwuoke, R.O. (2014) The Impact of Bank Credit on the Growth of Nigerian 

Economy: A Co Integration Approach. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, Vol.5, No.10, pp.87-

95. 

Nuno, C. L. (2012). Bank Credit and Economic Growth: A Dynamic Panel Data Analysis, The Economic Research 

Guardian, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 256-267 

Nzotta, S.M.   (2004) Money, Banking and Finance, Theory and Practice Owerri Hudson Jude Publishers. 

Nwanyanwu, O.J. (2010). An analysis of bank credit on the Nigeria economic growth, 1992-2008.Jos Journal of 

Economics. 4: 4-58 

Ogege, S. and Boloupremo, T. (2014). Deposit Money Banks and Economic Growth in  Nigeria. Financial Asset and 

Investing, (1), 41-50. 
Olokoyo F.O. (2011) Determinants of Commercial Banks’ Lending Behavior in Nigeria. International Journal of 

Financial Research Vol. 2, No. 2; pp. 61-72. 

Orji, A.(2012) Bank Savings and Bank Credits in Nigeria: Determinants and Impact on Economic Growth. 

International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues Vol. 2, No. 3, 2012, pp.357-372. 



Copyright © CC-BY-NC 2019, CRIBFB | AESR 

www.cribfb.com/journal/index.php/aesr                                       American Economic & Social Review                                             Vol. 5, No. 1; 2019 

 

9 
                           

Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development. Cambridge: Havard University Press.  

Shittu, A. I. (2012), “Financial Intermediation and Economic Growth in Nigeria”, British Journal of Arts and Social 

Sciences, Vol.4 No.2. pp. 164-179. 

Solanke, O. ‘Vision 2020: Need for a Purposive Approach’, (2007), . Accessed on March 4, 2008. 

Shaw, E. (1973). Financial deepening in economic development .London: Oxford University Press. 

Yakubu, Z. and Affoi, A.Y. An analysis of commercial banks’ credit on economic growth in Nigeria.Current 
Research Journal of Economic Theory. June, 2014, 6 (2): 11-15. 

 

 

 

Copyrights 

Copyright for this article is retained by the author(s), with first publication rights granted to the journal. 

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 

license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) 

 


