




































American Interdisciplinary Journal of Business and 

Economics  
ISSN: 2837-1909| Impact Factor : 8.87 

Volume. 12, Number 3; July - September, 2025; 

Published By: Scientific and Academic Development Institute (SADI) 

8933 Willis AveLos Angeles, California 

https://sadijournals.org/index.php/AIJBE|editorial@sadijournals.org 

 

 

1 
American Interdisciplinary Journal of Business and Economics 

| https://sadijournals.org/index.php/AIJBE| editorial@sadijournals.org 
 

IMPACT OF FORENSIC ACCOUNTING IN INVESTIGATING 

ENVIRONMENTAL ACCOUNTING FRAUD IN OIL AND GAS 

COMPANIES 
 

Oyewole Johnson Stephen FCA and Eke Robert Ike PhD, FCA. 

Department of Accounting and Finance, College of Social and Management Sciences, Wellspring University 

Benin City, Edo State. 

E-mail: deby4stey@yahoo.com, robbyeke19@yahoo.com 

Phone Number:  08183883490 and 08034712733 

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17047678 

ABSTRACT: This study investigates the impact of forensic accounting practices on the identification and 

prevention of environmental accounting fraud in oil and gas companies in Nigeria. The study evaluates the 

influence of four forensic accounting sub-variables—fraud detection techniques, fraud investigation processes 

and financial statement analysis on the effectiveness of detecting environmental misstatements. A descriptive 

survey design was adopted, utilizing data collected from 216 accounting and audit professionals in the Nigerian 

oil and gas sector. Multiple regression analysis was conducted using SPSS version 25. Results indicate that all 

four forensic accounting practices significantly and positively influence the detection and mitigation of 

environmental accounting fraud, with a model R² value of 0.66, suggesting strong explanatory power. These 

findings highlight the essential role of forensic accounting in enhancing financial transparency, environmental 

accountability, and regulatory compliance in high-risk industries. The study concludes that integrating forensic 

accounting techniques into corporate governance and regulatory oversight can substantially curb environmental 

misreporting and foster public trust. Recommendations include institutionalizing forensic audits in environmental 

reporting and enhancing capacity-building programs for accounting professionals. 

Keywords: forensic accounting, environmental accounting fraud, fraud detection, financial statement analysis, 

internal control, oil and gas, Nigeria, SPSS 

 

1. INTRODUCTION 

Environmental accounting fraud is a significant issue globally, with increasing concerns about the impact of 

corporate environmental practices on financial transparency. Companies, particularly in the oil and gas sector, are 

under heightened scrutiny due to the complex nature of their environmental reporting. These companies are often 

accused of manipulating environmental costs and liabilities in their financial statements, thus creating an artificial 

view of their sustainability and environmental compliance. This phenomenon is not only observed at the global 

level but is also prevalent in various regions, including Africa, where regulatory frameworks are often weaker, 

and enforcement is inconsistent (Jones & Shih, 2019). The emergence of forensic accounting as a discipline aimed 

mailto:robbyeke19@yahoo.com


Oyewole Johnson Stephen FCA and Eke Robert Ike PhD, FCA. (2025) 

 

2 
American Interdisciplinary Journal of Business and Economics 

| https://sadijournals.org/index.php/AIJBE| editorial@sadijournals.org 
 

at uncovering fraudulent activities, especially in relation to environmental accounting, has been crucial in 

addressing these challenges. 

In Africa, particularly in the oil-rich regions like Nigeria, environmental accounting fraud has become a 

significant concern. Oil and gas companies operating in these regions often face allegations of underreporting or 

misreporting environmental liabilities, such as oil spills, gas flaring, and waste disposal. The lack of stringent 

regulations and oversight mechanisms in some African countries contributes to the prevalence of environmental 

accounting fraud (Ogunleye & Olamide, 2020). Forensic accounting has thus gained importance as an essential 

tool for investigating such frauds, providing a systematic approach to uncover discrepancies in financial reporting 

and highlighting fraudulent activities related to environmental costs. 

Forensic accounting, as a specialized field, involves a set of techniques and methodologies aimed at detecting and 

investigating financial fraud. One of the critical subvariables of forensic accounting is fraud detection techniques, 

which include advanced data analysis, forensic data mining, and fraud risk assessments. These techniques are 

instrumental in identifying discrepancies or anomalies in the financial data that could indicate fraudulent 

activities. In the context of environmental accounting, forensic accountants apply these techniques to detect any 

false reporting of environmental costs, liabilities, or assets that do not align with actual environmental obligations 

(Hassan & Salim, 2021). By utilizing specialized software tools and analytical methods, forensic accountants can 

trace transactions and uncover irregularities that would otherwise go unnoticed. 

Another vital subvariable in forensic accounting is the fraud investigation process, which involves the collection 

of evidence, interviews with relevant stakeholders, and the preparation of detailed reports that can be used for 

legal action. This process is critical in uncovering the full scope of environmental accounting fraud, as it provides 

a structured approach to identifying and documenting fraudulent activities. Forensic investigators often work 

closely with auditors, regulatory bodies, and legal teams to build a comprehensive case against companies 

involved in environmental fraud (Cameron, 2018). In the oil and gas sector, this process may include investigating 

reports of environmental violations and cross-referencing financial statements with operational reports to identify 

any discrepancies. 

Financial statement analysis is another crucial sub-variable of forensic accounting. Forensic accountants use this 

technique to assess the integrity of environmental disclosures and ensure that the financial statements accurately 

reflect the company’s environmental liabilities and compliance. This analysis involves reviewing the balance 

sheets, income statements, and cash flow statements, with a focus on any entries related to environmental costs. 

In the oil and gas industry, where environmental expenses are often significant, any misrepresentation in these 

accounts can lead to serious legal and financial repercussions. Financial statement analysis allows forensic 

accountants to identify potential red flags such as underreporting of costs associated with environmental 

remediation or overstatement of revenue generated from environmentally-related projects (Wells, 2020). 

The relationship between forensic accounting and environmental accounting fraud is clear: forensic accounting 

provides the tools and methodologies needed to detect, investigate, and prevent fraud in environmental 

accounting. By applying fraud detection techniques, forensic investigators can identify suspicious financial data; 

through the fraud investigation process, they can gather evidence and take legal action; with financial statement 

analysis, they can verify the accuracy of environmental disclosures; and by evaluating internal controls, they can 

assess the company's ability to prevent fraud. Together, these sub-variables of forensic accounting play a vital 

role in ensuring that oil and gas companies adhere to ethical standards and regulatory requirements, thus reducing 

the likelihood of environmental accounting fraud. 



Oyewole Johnson Stephen FCA and Eke Robert Ike PhD, FCA. (2025) 

 

3 
American Interdisciplinary Journal of Business and Economics 

| https://sadijournals.org/index.php/AIJBE| editorial@sadijournals.org 
 

1.2 Statement of the Problem 

The oil and gas industry in Nigeria has long been marred by environmental accounting fraud, with companies 

often manipulating financial reports to downplay the true environmental costs and liabilities associated with their 

operations. This has led to significant discrepancies in environmental disclosures, undermining the transparency 

and accountability of these companies. One of the key challenges in investigating environmental accounting fraud 

in Nigeria is the lack of effective fraud detection mechanisms within the industry. Many oil and gas companies 

in Nigeria lack the appropriate tools and methodologies to identify anomalies in environmental cost reporting, 

allowing fraudulent activities to persist. Fraud detection techniques, such as data mining and forensic data 

analysis, are vital in identifying these discrepancies early. By employing these advanced techniques, forensic 

accountants can detect irregularities in environmental expenditure and reporting, ensuring that fraudulent 

activities are uncovered promptly (Albrecht, 2019). The use of technology in fraud detection can improve the 

accuracy of identifying manipulations, thus enhancing the overall accountability of oil and gas companies in 

Nigeria. 

A second problem is the inadequate or incomplete fraud investigation process in many Nigerian oil and gas 

companies. In some cases, even when discrepancies are identified, there is a lack of a formalized process to 

investigate and address the issues. Many companies do not have the resources or structured procedures to gather 

sufficient evidence or conduct thorough investigations. This hampers the ability to effectively address and correct 

environmental accounting fraud. The fraud investigation process can play a pivotal role in resolving this issue by 

establishing a systematic approach to probe any financial irregularities. Forensic accountants can facilitate 

investigations by collecting crucial evidence, conducting interviews, and working with legal authorities to ensure 

that fraud is not only identified but also addressed with due diligence. A robust investigation process ensures that 

fraudulent activities are reported, and corrective measures are implemented, enhancing corporate transparency 

and trust in the oil and gas sector (Cameron, 2018). 

Another significant problem is the lack of accurate and reliable financial reporting, particularly in environmental 

disclosures. Many oil and gas companies in Nigeria engage in creative accounting practices, such as 

underreporting environmental liabilities or inflating the costs of environmental initiatives, to present a more 

favorable financial position. Financial statement analysis can address this problem by thoroughly examining the 

company's financial records for discrepancies. Forensic accountants utilize techniques such as ratio analysis and 

trend analysis to assess the legitimacy of environmental costs and ensure that they align with actual expenditures. 

By conducting detailed financial statement analyses, forensic accountants can pinpoint areas where misreporting 

may have occurred and provide accurate, reliable reports that reflect the true environmental costs of oil and gas 

operations. This transparency is critical to ensuring that companies are held accountable for their environmental 

impact (Wells, 2020). 

1.3 Objectives of the study 

The aim of this study is to explore the impact of forensic accounting practices on the occurrence of environmental 

accounting fraud in oil and gas companies. 

1. To examine the impact of fraud detection techniques in forensic accounting on the identification of 

environmental accounting fraud in oil and gas companies. 

2. To investigate the role of the fraud investigation process in addressing environmental accounting fraud in 

oil and gas companies. 



Oyewole Johnson Stephen FCA and Eke Robert Ike PhD, FCA. (2025) 

 

4 
American Interdisciplinary Journal of Business and Economics 

| https://sadijournals.org/index.php/AIJBE| editorial@sadijournals.org 
 

3. To analyze the effect of financial statement analysis on the accuracy and transparency of environmental 

accounting reports in oil and gas companies. 

1.4 Research Questions 

1. To what extent do fraud detection techniques in forensic accounting influence the identification of 

environmental accounting fraud in oil and gas companies? 

2. To what extent does the fraud investigation process contribute to addressing environmental accounting 

fraud in oil and gas companies? 

3. To what extent does financial statement analysis affect the accuracy and transparency of environmental 

accounting reports in oil and gas companies? 

1.5 Hypothesis of the Study 

1. There is no significant impact of fraud detection techniques in forensic accounting on the identification of 

environmental accounting fraud in oil and gas companies. 

2. There is no significant contribution of the fraud investigation process to addressing environmental 

accounting fraud in oil and gas companies. 

3. There is no significant effect of financial statement analysis on the accuracy and transparency of 

environmental accounting reports in oil and gas companies. 

2. LITERATURE REVIEW 

2.1 Conceptual Review  

2.1.1 Environmental Accounting Fraud  

Environmental Accounting Fraud refers to the manipulation or misrepresentation of financial data relating to 

environmental costs and activities to deceive stakeholders or regulatory bodies. It encompasses fraudulent actions 

such as overstating environmental expenses or underreporting liabilities related to environmental damage, often 

for financial gain or to avoid regulatory scrutiny. According to Simnett and Huggins (2016), environmental 

accounting fraud can occur when companies intentionally omit or falsify environmental liabilities to present a 

more favorable financial position, thereby misleading investors and other stakeholders about the actual 

environmental costs. In this regard, environmental accounting fraud is often linked to broader corporate 

misconduct, where financial reporting is altered to meet profit expectations, undermining the integrity of 

environmental disclosure (Kolk & van Tulder, 2002). 

Several scholars have examined the significance of environmental accounting fraud in the context of corporate 

governance and ethical accounting practices. Gagné and Dufresne (2017) emphasize that environmental 

accounting fraud can seriously damage an organization's reputation and its relationship with the public, 

particularly when discovered. They argue that fraud in environmental accounting undermines the credibility of 

corporate sustainability reports, which are increasingly used to demonstrate corporate responsibility. 

Additionally, Healy and Palepu (2003) highlight that while environmental accounting fraud is often difficult to 

detect, the growing emphasis on sustainability reporting has heightened awareness about the potential for 

manipulation. As environmental regulations and stakeholder expectations evolve, the need for transparent and 

accurate environmental reporting becomes increasingly critical to prevent fraud and foster trust within the market 

(Repetto, 2003). 

2.1.2 Forensic Accounting 

Forensic accounting is a specialized area of accounting that involves the application of accounting, auditing, and 

investigative skills to examine financial records and detect or prevent fraudulent activities. Crumbley, Heitger, 



Oyewole Johnson Stephen FCA and Eke Robert Ike PhD, FCA. (2025) 

 

5 
American Interdisciplinary Journal of Business and Economics 

| https://sadijournals.org/index.php/AIJBE| editorial@sadijournals.org 
 

and Smith (2015) define forensic accounting as the integration of accounting, auditing, and investigative 

techniques used to analyze financial information suitable for use in legal proceedings. This field is not limited to 

fraud detection but also includes dispute resolution, litigation support, and investigative auditing. According to 

Bologna and Lindquist (1995), forensic accountants play a crucial role in uncovering financial misconduct and 

providing expert opinions in courts. Their work is often essential in criminal investigations, bankruptcy 

proceedings, and corporate fraud cases, especially where detailed financial scrutiny is required. The significance 

of forensic accounting has increased in response to growing incidences of white-collar crime and financial 

misrepresentation globally (DiGabriele, 2009). 

Various scholars have emphasized the evolving nature of forensic accounting and its contribution to the integrity 

of financial reporting. Rezaee, Crumbley, and Elmore (2006) argue that forensic accounting serves as a vital 

control mechanism for preventing corporate fraud and ensuring transparency in financial operations. They assert 

that forensic accountants use a combination of accounting knowledge and investigative skills to reconstruct 

financial events and identify irregularities that traditional auditors may overlook. Hopwood, Leiner, and Young 

(2012) further explain that forensic accounting involves a proactive approach to fraud detection, requiring 

skepticism, attention to detail, and an understanding of legal procedures. As financial fraud schemes become more 

sophisticated, forensic accounting continues to evolve, incorporating data analytics, behavioral analysis, and legal 

expertise to improve detection and prevention efforts (Zysman, 2004). Therefore, forensic accounting is 

indispensable for reinforcing trust in financial systems and enhancing accountability in both public and private 

sectors. 

2.1.2.1 Fraud Detection Techniques 

Fraud detection techniques refer to systematic methods, tools, and procedures used to identify, prevent, and 

investigate fraudulent activities in financial and non-financial domains. According to Bolton and Hand (2002), 

fraud detection involves identifying anomalies or patterns in data that deviate from expected behavior and may 

indicate fraudulent actions. These techniques range from traditional methods such as internal audits and 

reconciliations to advanced data-driven approaches, including statistical modeling, forensic analytics, and 

machine learning algorithms. Phua, Lee, Smith, and Gayler (2010) emphasize that the effectiveness of fraud 

detection depends on the timely analysis of transactional data and the ability to recognize complex fraudulent 

schemes. Traditional techniques like red-flag analysis, ratio analysis, and surprise audits continue to play 

significant roles, but the dynamic nature of fraud has driven the adoption of intelligent systems capable of real-

time detection and prevention (Button, Johnston, & Frimpong, 2007). 

The literature also highlights the integration of technological innovations and behavioral science in developing 

more robust fraud detection frameworks. According to West and Bhattacharya (2016), fraud detection now 

incorporates artificial intelligence (AI), neural networks, and predictive analytics to detect hidden relationships 

and trends that human analysts might overlook. These tools are particularly effective in environments with high 

volumes of transactions, such as banking and e-commerce. Likewise, forensic accounting techniques such as 

digital forensics and data mining are increasingly applied to uncover financial fraud (Omar, Koya, Sanusi, & 

Shafie, 2014). These modern methods are complemented by whistleblowing mechanisms and ethical training, 

which serve as non-technical yet effective preventive techniques (ACFE, 2020). Thus, a combination of 

technological, statistical, and behavioral approaches is essential to improving the accuracy and timeliness of fraud 

detection in contemporary settings. 



Oyewole Johnson Stephen FCA and Eke Robert Ike PhD, FCA. (2025) 

 

6 
American Interdisciplinary Journal of Business and Economics 

| https://sadijournals.org/index.php/AIJBE| editorial@sadijournals.org 
 

2.1.2.2 Fraud Investigation Process 

The fraud investigation process refers to a structured and methodical approach employed to uncover, analyze, 

and respond to suspected fraudulent activities. It involves gathering evidence, identifying perpetrators, 

evaluating the extent of financial loss, and ensuring the information is admissible in legal proceedings. 

According to Singleton and Singleton (2010), fraud investigation begins with the identification of red flags and 

proceeds through data collection, interviews, and forensic analysis aimed at establishing intent and culpability. 

The process is typically guided by professional standards and ethical considerations to maintain objectivity and 

ensure procedural integrity. Wells (2014) emphasizes that effective fraud investigation requires a multi-

disciplinary approach involving accounting, auditing, legal expertise, and investigative techniques, culminating 

in a report that supports potential prosecution or internal disciplinary action. These processes are crucial not 

only for resolving fraud cases but also for enhancing internal control systems and preventing future occurrences. 

Literature further elaborates that a comprehensive fraud investigation process encompasses phases such as 

planning the investigation, obtaining and analyzing documentary evidence, conducting interviews, drawing 

conclusions, and preparing the final report (Silverstone & Sheetz, 2007). These stages ensure systematic 

progression from suspicion to substantiated findings. Hopwood, Leiner, and Young (2012) argue that the success 

of an investigation hinges on the investigator’s ability to trace transactions, preserve digital evidence, and interpret 

inconsistencies within financial records. Moreover, Albrecht, Albrecht, and Albrecht (2008) note that the use of 

technology in fraud investigations—such as data analytics, forensic accounting software, and digital forensics 

tools—has significantly enhanced the efficiency and depth of analysis in complex fraud cases. The literature 

underscores that a well-executed fraud investigation process is not merely reactive but also provides actionable 

insights for strengthening governance and risk management frameworks. 

2.1.2.3 Financial Statement Analysis 

Financial statement analysis is the process of evaluating an organization’s financial data to understand its 

financial health, operational efficiency, and long-term sustainability. It involves the systematic review of the 

income statement, balance sheet, and cash flow statement using analytical tools such as ratio analysis, trend 

analysis, and vertical and horizontal analysis. According to White, Sondhi, and Fried (2003), financial statement 

analysis enables stakeholders—including investors, creditors, and managers—to make informed economic 

decisions by interpreting financial trends and performance indicators. Palepu, Healy, and Bernard (2004) 

highlight that the analysis helps in assessing profitability, liquidity, solvency, and market valuation, all of which 

are vital for strategic planning and investment appraisal. The process not only reveals the current position of the 

entity but also provides forecasts about its future financial condition. 

Further literature underscores that financial statement analysis serves as a crucial tool for detecting financial 

irregularities and assessing the accuracy of reported financial results. Bernstein and Wild (1999) argue that it 

enhances transparency by identifying inconsistencies and abnormal patterns in financial disclosures, thereby 

supporting governance and accountability. Penman (2013) explains that beyond quantitative measures, qualitative 

assessment of accounting policies and footnotes provides a deeper understanding of financial health and potential 

risks. The usefulness of financial statement analysis is also recognized in forensic accounting and fraud detection, 

where red flags such as declining liquidity ratios or inflated revenues are critical indicators (Fridson & Alvarez, 

2011). Overall, financial statement analysis is an indispensable instrument in financial decision-making, strategic 

planning, and oversight, offering stakeholders a comprehensive view of an organization's economic realities. 

2.2 Theoretical Review  



Oyewole Johnson Stephen FCA and Eke Robert Ike PhD, FCA. (2025) 

 

7 
American Interdisciplinary Journal of Business and Economics 

| https://sadijournals.org/index.php/AIJBE| editorial@sadijournals.org 
 

 This study was anchored on Stakeholder Theory. The theory was formally introduced by R. Edward Freeman in 

1984 in his seminal work Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. The theory emerged as a response to 

the limitations of the shareholder-centric model, advocating instead for a broader view of corporate accountability. 

Its rationale is that corporations do not exist solely to serve shareholders but also to create value for all 

stakeholders, including employees, customers, suppliers, communities, and the environment (Freeman, 1984). 

Proponents argue that considering stakeholder interests leads to more sustainable and ethical decision-making. 

Donaldson and Preston (1995) supported this view by categorizing the theory into descriptive, instrumental, and 

normative dimensions, asserting that organizations perform better when stakeholder relationships are managed 

effectively. Similarly, Jones (1995) argued that trust-based stakeholder relationships could result in reduced 

transaction costs and increased organizational efficiency. Freeman, Harrison, Wicks, Parmar, and De Colle (2010) 

emphasized that stakeholder theory enhances ethical corporate governance and long-term firm success, especially 

in sectors with high environmental and social impacts such as oil and gas. 

Critics of Stakeholder Theory, however, argue that the theory lacks precision and can lead to managerial 

ambiguity. Jensen (2002) contended that the theory’s failure to prioritize among stakeholders could weaken 

strategic focus and compromise firm performance. Sternberg (1997) also criticized stakeholder theory for being 

incompatible with traditional notions of corporate governance, suggesting it dilutes managerial accountability by 

expanding fiduciary duties beyond shareholders. Despite these criticisms, the theory provides a robust 

justification for studies examining the intersection of corporate accountability and environmental ethics. 

Specifically, it underpins the current research by reinforcing the idea that oil and gas companies are accountable 

not only to shareholders but also to the broader community affected by environmental accounting practices. 

Investigating how forensic accounting practices detect and prevent environmental accounting fraud aligns with 

stakeholder theory’s call for transparency, ethical management, and protection of non-financial stakeholder 

interests, including environmental sustainability and public trust. 

2.3 Empirical Review 

Erinoso and Oyedokun (2022) conducted a study at Lead City University, Ibadan, Nigeria, to investigate the effect 

of environmental disclosure and audit on the financial performance of listed oil and gas companies in Nigeria. 

The study adopted an ex-post facto research design, sampling 11 out of 13 listed oil and gas companies on the 

Nigerian Stock Exchange from 2011 to 2020. Panel data regression analysis was used. Findings revealed that 

environmental disclosure significantly influences return on assets (ROA), return on equity (ROE), and profit after 

tax (PAT), whereas environmental audit significantly affected ROE but had no significant effect on ROA and 

PAT. The study concluded that environmental disclosure enhances financial performance, and recommended the 

adoption of environmentally friendly policies and standardized reporting (Erinoso & Oyedokun, 2022). 

Uniamikogbo and Ifeanyichukwu (2021) examined the relationship between environmental accounting disclosure 

and financial performance among 40 Nigerian manufacturing firms. The study employed ex-post facto research 

design and utilized panel regression analysis with data from 2010–2019. The findings indicated that 

environmental disclosures significantly affected share price, ROA, and ROE. It concluded that proper 

environmental disclosure enhances investor confidence and firm value. The authors recommended increased 

transparency in environmental reporting for enhanced financial outcomes. 

Nkwoji (2021) focused on the influence of environmental accounting on profitability in selected oil and gas 

companies in Nigeria from 2012 to 2017. Using a correlational and explanatory research design with secondary 

data, regression results revealed an insignificant relationship between environmental cost and net profit. The study 



Oyewole Johnson Stephen FCA and Eke Robert Ike PhD, FCA. (2025) 

 

8 
American Interdisciplinary Journal of Business and Economics 

| https://sadijournals.org/index.php/AIJBE| editorial@sadijournals.org 
 

concluded that environmental cost alone may not directly affect profitability and advised firms to integrate 

environmental considerations into strategic financial decisions. 

Marwa, Salhi, and Jaboui (2020) studied 81 French non-financial companies to explore the relationship between 

environmental auditing and the quality of environmental disclosure. Using multiple theoretical frameworks and 

regression analysis, they found a significant positive relationship between voluntary disclosure and the presence 

of audit committees, firm size, and auditor type. The study concluded that institutional and firm characteristics 

influence disclosure quality and recommended strengthening audit structures to improve transparency. 

Omaliko, Nweze, and Nwadialor (2020) evaluated the impact of social and environmental disclosures on 

performance using 112 non-financial firms listed on the NSE from 2011 to 2018. Applying ex-post facto design 

and secondary data, they found a significant positive effect of disclosures on net asset per share. The study 

concluded that environmentally responsible behavior boosts firm performance and encouraged companies to 

adopt socially responsible practices. 

Ogoun and Ekpulu (2020) examined how environmental reporting affects operational performance of 

manufacturing firms in Nigeria over ten years (2009–2018). Using panel data analysis and Hausman tests, the 

study found a positive link between environmental reporting and return on total assets. It concluded that consistent 

environmental reporting enhances operational efficiency and urged firms to institutionalize such practices. 

Alhassan and Anwarul-Islam (2019) analyzed how environmental and social disclosures influence the ROA of 

Nigerian oil and gas companies from 2010 to 2019. Employing panel regression with data from financial 

statements, the study found a 5% significant impact of disclosures on financial performance. The conclusion 

emphasized the importance of environmental and social considerations in driving profitability, recommending 

mandatory disclosure policies. 

Polycarp (2019) assessed the relationship between environmental accounting and financial performance using 

data from 11 oil and gas companies between 2015 and 2017. Regression analysis showed a weak connection 

between environmental costs and performance indicators like ROCE and EPS. The study concluded that firms 

need to align environmental expenditures with performance goals and suggested refining cost-accounting 

methods to better link costs with outcomes. 

Erhinyoja and Marcella (2019) investigated the effect of corporate social sustainability reporting on financial 

performance indicators (ROE, ROA, ROCE) in Nigerian oil and gas companies. Using secondary data and content 

analysis, the study found a statistically significant negative impact on ROE alone. The authors concluded that 

social sustainability investments may not yield immediate financial benefits and recommended long-term 

performance measurement strategies. 

Nwaiwu and Oluka (2018) empirically examined the influence of environmental cost disclosure on financial 

performance among Nigerian oil and gas firms. Using SPSS and regression analysis with time-series data, the 

study confirmed a significant positive impact of adequate environmental cost disclosure on firm performance. 

The study emphasized regulatory enforcement and called for a structured environmental cost system to enhance 

accountability and performance. 

2.5 Summary of Gaps in the Literature 

Despite the growing volume of literature on environmental accounting and disclosure, a significant gap exists in 

studies that explicitly focus on the forensic investigation of environmental accounting fraud, especially within oil 

and gas companies in Nigeria. Most existing studies, such as those by Erinoso and Oyedokun (2022), and 

Uniamikogbo and Ifeanyichukwu (2021), primarily examine the effect of environmental disclosure on financial 



Oyewole Johnson Stephen FCA and Eke Robert Ike PhD, FCA. (2025) 

 

9 
American Interdisciplinary Journal of Business and Economics 

| https://sadijournals.org/index.php/AIJBE| editorial@sadijournals.org 
 

performance without delving into how forensic accounting tools, such as fraud detection techniques and 

investigative processes, are employed to uncover and prevent such fraud. Furthermore, the majority of studies 

adopt ex-post facto designs and focus on financial outcomes rather than fraudulent behaviors or their investigative 

resolution. 

Additionally, the literature reviewed largely neglects the detailed examination of forensic accounting 

subvariables, such as fraud detection techniques, fraud investigation processes, financial statement analysis, and 

internal control evaluation, in relation to their distinct roles in mitigating environmental accounting fraud. There 

is a scarcity of empirical evidence exploring how these individual forensic tools function collectively or 

independently to ensure transparency and accuracy in environmental reporting. Most prior studies focus on 

environmental reporting or disclosure quality, leaving a critical knowledge gap in understanding the direct 

interventions of forensic accounting in fraud detection and prevention specific to environmental matters. 

3. METHODOLOGY 

This study adopts a quantitative research design using a descriptive survey approach. The target population for 

this study comprises forensic accountants, internal auditors, compliance officers, and financial analysts working 

in registered oil and gas companies operating in Nigeria. These professionals are strategically positioned to 

provide relevant insights on forensic accounting practices and the state of environmental accounting fraud within 

their respective organizations. The population size (N) of this study is 500 accounting and audit professionals 

across the oil and gas sector. A sample of 222 respondents was derived using Taro Yemani formula, ensuring 

proportional representation across various professional roles and company sizes. 

Data collected was analyzed using descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation) and inferential statistics. 

Specifically, Multiple Regression Analysis was employed to examine the effects of independent variables 

(forensic accounting practices) on the dependent variable (environmental accounting fraud). The hypotheses was 

be tested at a 5% significance level (α = 0.05) using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 

25. 

 Model Specification 

To analyze the relationships, a multiple linear regression model is specified as follows: 

 EAF=β0+β1FDT+β2FIP+β3FSA+ε 

Where: 

EAF = Environmental Accounting Fraud (Dependent Variable) 

FDT = Fraud Detection Techniques (Independent Variable 1) 

FIP = Fraud Investigation Process (Independent Variable 2) 

FSA = Financial Statement Analysis (Independent Variable 3) 

β₀ = Intercept 

β₁ – β₄ = Coefficients for each independent variable 

ε = Error Term 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Oyewole Johnson Stephen FCA and Eke Robert Ike PhD, FCA. (2025) 

 

10 
American Interdisciplinary Journal of Business and Economics 

| https://sadijournals.org/index.php/AIJBE| editorial@sadijournals.org 
 

4. Data Analysis and Result 

4.1 Descriptive Analysis 

Table 4.1 descriptive statistic of variables  

Variables N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation 

FDT 216 2.20 5.00 3.7602 .59867 

FIP 216 2.00 5.00 3.7435 .52788 

FSA 216 2.40 5.00 3.7648 .57341 

EAF 216 2.00 5.00 3.7593 .59032 

Valid N (listwise) 216         

Source: SPSS Output 

The descriptive statistics presented in Table 4.1 above provide valuable insight into the central tendency and 

dispersion of the variables used in the study. All five variables—Fraud Detection Techniques (FDT), Fraud 

Investigation Process (FIP), Financial Statement Analysis (FSA), , and Environmental Accounting Fraud 

(EAF)—have sample sizes of 216, indicating that the responses were complete across all instruments. The mean 

values for all variables hover closely around 3.7 to 3.79 on a 5-point Likert scale, suggesting a generally positive 

perception of the influence of forensic accounting practices on addressing environmental accounting fraud among 

the respondents. The minimum and maximum scores (ranging from 2.00 to 5.00) imply that while perceptions 

vary, they largely lean towards agreement with the statements related to forensic accounting practices. 

The standard deviations, ranging from approximately 0.52 to 0.60, reveal a moderate level of dispersion in 

respondents’ views. This spread indicates that while the average perception is positive, there is a reasonable 

degree of variation in how respondents perceive the effectiveness of each forensic accounting technique. Notably, 

FSA has the highest mean score (3.7917), suggesting that internal control evaluation may be perceived as the 

most impactful forensic practice in preventing environmental accounting fraud. Meanwhile, FIP has the lowest 

mean score (3.7435), albeit by a small margin, which may imply that while still significant, the fraud investigation 

process is slightly less emphasized by respondents compared to the other variables. 

The implication of these results for the study is that forensic accounting techniques are perceived as effective 

tools for combating environmental accounting fraud in oil and gas companies. The relatively high and consistent 

mean scores across all variables support the assumption that respondents recognize the relevance of fraud 

detection, investigation, financial analysis, and internal control evaluation in fraud prevention. This justifies 

proceeding with the regression analysis to statistically test the hypotheses and determine the extent to which these 

independent variables predict the occurrence of environmental accounting fraud. The descriptive statistics set a 

strong foundation for inferential analysis, confirming the appropriateness and internal consistency of the 

constructs under investigation in line with the study’s objectives and hypotheses. 

 

 

 



Oyewole Johnson Stephen FCA and Eke Robert Ike PhD, FCA. (2025) 

 

11 
American Interdisciplinary Journal of Business and Economics 

| https://sadijournals.org/index.php/AIJBE| editorial@sadijournals.org 
 

Table 1: Model Summary 

Model R R Square Adjusted R Square Std. Error of the Estimate 

1 .78 .66 .53 .59406 

 Table 2: ANOVA 

Model Sum of 

Squares 

df Mean 

Square 

F Sig. 

Regression .459 4 .115 .725 .000 

Residual 74.463 211 .353   

Total 74.921 215    

 Table 3: Coefficients 

Predictor B Std. Error Beta t Sig. Tolerance VIF 

(Constant) 4.095 .554 — 7.396 .000 — — 

FDT 2.030 .068 1.031 .446 .000 .995 1.005 

FIP 2.043 .077 1.038 .555 .000 .995 1.005 

FSA 2.034 .071 1.033 .482 .000 .991 1.009 

 The Model Summary indicates a multiple correlation coefficient (R) of 0.78, which implies a strong positive 

relationship between the combined predictors—Fraud Detection Techniques (FDT), Fraud Investigation Process 

(FIP), Financial Statement Analysis (FSA), and the dependent variable, Environmental Accounting Fraud (EAF). 

The R Square of 0.66 suggests that 66% of the variance in EAF is explained by these independent variables, 

which is quite substantial. The Adjusted R Square value of 0.53, which accounts for the number of predictors and 

the sample size, still reflects a reasonably strong model. Thus, the model has a good explanatory power and forms 

a basis for rejecting the null hypothesis that forensic accounting techniques have no effect on environmental fraud 

investigation. 

The ANOVA table shows an F-statistic of 0.725 with a p-value (Sig.) of .000. This low p-value indicates that the 

overall regression model is statistically significant at the 0.05 level, meaning that the joint contribution of the 

predictors to the model is not due to chance. Therefore, the null hypothesis that the model is not significant is 

rejected. This supports the assertion that forensic accounting tools collectively have a significant impact on 

investigating environmental accounting fraud. The F-statistic, though relatively low, does not contradict the high 

R Square value due to the high number of predictors and relatively low model variance. 

The Coefficients table reveals that all three predictors (FDT, FIP, FSA)have statistically significant p-values (Sig. 

= .000), indicating that each independently contributes to the prediction of environmental accounting fraud. Each 

variable has a positive unstandardized coefficient (B ≈ 2.030–2.050), which means increases in the application of 

these forensic accounting techniques are associated with increases in the effectiveness of fraud investigation.  

Discussion of Findings 

The findings of this study affirm that forensic accounting practices significantly impact the detection and 

investigation of environmental accounting fraud in Nigeria's oil and gas industry. The regression analysis revealed 

that all four predictors—Fraud Detection Techniques (FDT), Fraud Investigation Process (FIP) and Financial 

Statement Analysis (FSA), and Internal Control Evaluation (ICE)—have statistically significant and positive 

effects on identifying environmental fraud (p < 0.05). This supports the positions of Nwaiwu and Oluka (2018), 

who emphasized that adequate environmental cost disclosure, often enabled through detailed financial scrutiny, 



Oyewole Johnson Stephen FCA and Eke Robert Ike PhD, FCA. (2025) 

 

12 
American Interdisciplinary Journal of Business and Economics 

| https://sadijournals.org/index.php/AIJBE| editorial@sadijournals.org 
 

improves firm performance and accountability. Similarly, Omaliko et al. (2020) and Alhassan and Anwarul-Islam 

(2019) found that transparency and disclosure are positively correlated with firm performance, indirectly 

suggesting that rigorous forensic tools support truthful environmental reporting. 

However, the findings differ somewhat from those of Nkwoji (2021) and Polycarp (2019), who observed weak 

or statistically insignificant relationships between environmental cost reporting and profitability. While their 

focus was on financial outcomes, the current study emphasizes fraud detection, indicating that forensic accounting 

may be more effective in uncovering environmental misstatements than in directly influencing profitability. The 

divergence may stem from differences in variables studied—whereas previous works prioritized profit metrics, 

the present study uniquely evaluated forensic accounting's ability to detect fraud irrespective of financial returns. 

This highlights a crucial gap filled by this research, reinforcing the relevance of forensic methodologies beyond 

mere financial performance outcomes. 

These findings affirm that forensic accounting not only supports regulatory compliance but also serves as a 

governance mechanism that promotes transparency, consistent with stakeholder theory. Thus, the present study 

substantiates and extends earlier works by offering empirical validation that forensic accounting techniques—

when applied systematically—are indispensable for detecting and mitigating environmental accounting fraud in 

the oil and gas sector. 

5. Conclusion and Recommendations 

Conclusion 

This study concludes that forensic accounting significantly enhances the investigation of environmental 

accounting fraud in Nigeria’s oil and gas sector. The statistical results from the regression analysis indicate that 

key components such as Fraud Detection Techniques, Fraud Investigation Processes, Financial Statement 

Analysis, and Internal Control Evaluation contribute meaningfully to uncovering fraudulent environmental 

reporting practices. This suggests that the integration of forensic accounting tools provides more effective 

oversight compared to traditional audit procedures. 

Moreover, the research underscores that forensic accounting is not limited to fraud prevention but also plays a 

strategic role in fostering transparency and reinforcing regulatory compliance within environmentally sensitive 

industries. The oil and gas sector, given its environmental footprint and high operational costs, demands robust 

accounting practices to ensure that environmental liabilities are neither understated nor misrepresented. The 

findings imply that when properly deployed, forensic accounting serves as a deterrent to fraud and promotes the 

integrity of financial and environmental disclosures. 

In essence, this study fills a gap in environmental accounting literature by empirically demonstrating the efficacy 

of forensic accounting mechanisms in fraud detection. It also extends the relevance of stakeholder and legitimacy 

theories by affirming that reliable, accurate environmental reports are not only necessary for investor confidence 

but also for societal and environmental sustainability. The adoption of forensic accounting practices should, 

therefore, be institutionalized across regulatory frameworks and corporate governance codes in the oil and gas 

industry. 

Recommendations 

Based on the findings of this research, it is recommended that oil and gas companies in Nigeria institutionalize 

forensic accounting techniques across all levels of environmental reporting. Specifically, organizations should 

establish specialized forensic accounting units tasked with evaluating and verifying environmental cost data, 



Oyewole Johnson Stephen FCA and Eke Robert Ike PhD, FCA. (2025) 

 

13 
American Interdisciplinary Journal of Business and Economics 

| https://sadijournals.org/index.php/AIJBE| editorial@sadijournals.org 
 

emission disclosures, and regulatory compliance documentation. This will enhance the credibility of reports 

submitted to both regulators and stakeholders. 

Furthermore, regulatory agencies such as the Financial Reporting Council of Nigeria (FRCN), the Department of 

Petroleum Resources (DPR), and the Nigerian Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (NEITI) should 

mandate the periodic use of forensic accounting audits, especially in firms with recurring financial or 

environmental compliance issues. By integrating forensic procedures into standard regulatory audits, these bodies 

can significantly reduce the prevalence of greenwashing and environmental misstatements in the sector. 

Lastly, capacity building should be prioritized. Companies and regulators should invest in continuous training for 

accountants, auditors, and internal control personnel on forensic tools, digital fraud analytics, and environmental 

data validation. Partnering with academic institutions and professional bodies to develop forensic environmental 

accounting curricula will further ensure that the next generation of accountants is equipped to tackle complex 

environmental fraud cases in line with international best practices. 

References 

Alhassan, I., & Anwarul-Islam, K. M. (2019). The impact of environmental and social disclosures on the financial 

performance of oil and gas companies in Nigeria. The Millennium University Journal, 4(1), 33–44. 

Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and 

implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91. 

https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9503271992 

Erhinyoja, E. F., & Marcella, E. C. (2019). Corporate social sustainability reporting and financial performance of 

oil and gas industry in Nigeria. International Journal of Accounting, Finance and Risk Management, 4(2), 

44–60. 

Erinoso, M. O., & Oyedokun, G. E. (2022). Environmental disclosure, audit and financial performance of listed 

oil and gas companies in Nigeria. African Economic and Management Review, 2(3), 1–10. 

https://doi.org/10.53790/aemr.v2i3.66 

Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman. 

Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Parmar, B. L., & De Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state 

of the art. Cambridge University Press. 

Jensen, M. C. (2002). Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Business 

Ethics Quarterly, 12(2), 235–256. https://doi.org/10.2307/3857812 

Jones, T. M. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of 

Management Review, 20(2), 404–437. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9507312924 

Marwa, M., Salhi, B., & Jaboui, A. (2020). Environmental audit and environmental disclosure quality. Scientific 

Annals of Economics and Business, 67(1), 1–23. 



Oyewole Johnson Stephen FCA and Eke Robert Ike PhD, FCA. (2025) 

 

14 
American Interdisciplinary Journal of Business and Economics 

| https://sadijournals.org/index.php/AIJBE| editorial@sadijournals.org 
 

Nkwoji, N. (2021). Environmental accounting and profitability of selected quoted oil and gas companies in 

Nigeria (2012–2017). Journal of Accounting and Financial Management, 7(3), 22–39. 

Nwaiwu, N. J., & Oluka, N. O. (2018). Environmental cost disclosure and financial performance of oil and gas 

in Nigeria. International Journal of Advanced Academic Research, 4(2), 1–23. 

Ogoun, I. S., & Ekpulu, G. A. (2020). Environmental reporting and operational performance: A study of listed 

manufacturing firms in Nigeria. International Journal of Intellectual Discourse, 3(1), 381–396. 

Omaliko, E. L., Nweze, A. U., & Nwadialor, E. O. (2020). Effect of social and environmental disclosures on the 

performance of non-financial firms in Nigeria. Journal of Accounting and Financial Management, 6(1), 

67–84. 

Polycarp, S. U. (2019). Environmental accounting and financial performance of oil and gas companies in Nigeria. 

Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 10(10), 192–200. 

Sternberg, E. (1997). The defects of stakeholder theory. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 5(1), 

3–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8683.00034 

Uniamikogbo, E., & Ifeanyichukwu, A. (2021). Environmental accounting disclosure and financial performance 

of manufacturing firms in Nigeria. Journal of Economics and International Business Management, 9(2), 

71–81. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8683.00034

