




































American International Journal of Business and Management Studies  

Vol. 2, No. 1; 2020 

ISSN 2641-4937     E-ISSN 2641-4953 

Published by American Center of Science and Education, USA 

 

1 

 

Impact of Monetary Policies on the Exchange Rate and Global 

Trade Evidence from Ghana 

 
 

Rabnawaz Khan 

School of Finance and Economics 

 Jiangsu University 

 Zhenjiang, Jiangsu, Zhenjiang 212013, People’s Republic of China 

 E-mail: khan.rab@stmail.ujs.edu.cn 

 

 

Abstract  
The impact of monetary policies and their implementation by the exchange rate covered the economic condition of 

Ghana. The social inclusion and conversion factors change the implemented policies of nations, where the real price, 

trade, technology, a price rate, and price level of ratio take an important part of growth. The reform of the financial 

sector favors the free-floating of the exchange rate and global trade under the premise of flexible exchange rates. 

The tragedy of country growth and exchange rate toward a trajectory of growth with the growth-enhancing effect 

through social inclusion, conversion factors, price level ratio, exchange rate, merchant rate, export, and trade 

services. The research study is based on the secondary study and social inclusion equity indicators with public 

resources, building human resources and social protection for economic development has determined. Different 

evidence and trade indicators classify the monetary policies. The significant influence of growth and internal 
policies has affected trade and exchange rates with growth and reserve policies. The results have computed by linear 

regression and it proved that social inclusion and alternative conversion factors impact on global trade and create 

short term binary relationships.  

 

Keywords: Trade, Conversion Factors, Price Rate, Economic Growth. 

  

1. Introduction  
The main aims of this study paper are to examine the importance of monetary policies and their implication on the 

growth level with the exchange rate, which showed by the trade, conversion factor, a price rate, and the growth level 

of GDP. The economic growth in Ghana determines the two different policies of patents and promoting. 30% 

Ghanaians deal with the financial sectors and hold the big flow of financial circumstance, will this effect on 

monetary policies and or just creating the big gap in economic principle. There are two macroeconomic policies 
implemented to control government budgets and financial flow. Such as fiscal and metering policy, that can use the 

economic manager to control the budgeting and fiancé. (Khanna, Greener, Straka, & Adams, 2019) The health of 

fiancé to manage by expanding economic growth (GDP). The monitoring and fiscal policies are complementary to 

each other in Ghana. The monitoring policies are being worked by a civil society along with the strong policy 

program and strategies. (Agusto& Khan, 2018; Ahmed et al., 2020). 

The insight policies and an agenda based on trade and fiscal policies. It is advance to understanding the 

policy agenda and trade sector pregame in Ghana. And, to determine the agenda of sector programs which 

influenced by how the national income level uses their sources of power to define the material of fiscal policies. 

(Adu, Marbuah, & Mensah, 2013) The power sources identified the structural authority; access by political 

influence, control, conversion factor, trade implementation, demographic change plan of trade, (Lin & Agyeman, 

2019; Uddin, Sjö, & Shahbaz, 2013) The policies should not the pursuit of transformative changes and improvement 
of economic system by low-income countries. According to Rochefort the frame of label issues of economic 

decision influences trade, a price rate in economic development. (Kong & Khan, 2019) The policy agenda setting 

and planning the subsequent issues labeling and policy sector with a problem. (Bond, Söderbom, & Wu, 2011; 

Mensah & Botchway, 2013) 

The importance of this research paper is showing the basic monetary policies under the state of social 

inclusion, conversion factors, economic growth, and global trade. However, prior research papers discussed the 

issues of global trade in a term of long term but not directly classify the issues of monetary policies under the above 



www.acseusa.org/journal/index.php/aijbms     American International Journal of Business and Management Studies   Vol. 2, No. 1; 2020 

2 

 

indicators, therefore this research study based on novelty. (Murtazashvili, Murtazashvili, & Salahodjaev, 2019; 

Traoré, 2019) The research data based on World Bank indicators and the financial department of Ghana. 2nd section 

of a research paper is based on literature and expert theories. We base the 3rd section on the research method and 

4th is an analysis and the last one shows the recommendation and conclusion of the research paper. 

  

2. Literature 
The prior work of research showed the financial development-economic growth with extensive attention in the 

development and have analyzed the finance-led growth hypothesis with the content of cal-innovation through the 

efficient allocation of resources from the trade and unproductivity sectors. (Adu et al., 2013) The development of 

robust financial factors can spur growth and services with non-financial sectors along a growth path. The content of 

this economic growth based on trade and implemented economic policies and financial sectors, and thus 

development financial sectors focus on the efficiency of trade and monitoring policies. (Amri, 2017) The financial 

development and efficiency of investment are important for financial liberalization in promoting domestic and hence 

investment. The works of the foundation for liberalization and developing countries including Ghana, as part of the 

IMF bank change program. (Herrerias, Cuadros, & Luo, 2016). 

We must emphasize that variant argument has been an advance in the literature between economic growth 

and financial development. (Acheampong & Maryudi, 2020) The empirical studies in the literature have investigated 

the relationship between financial depth and growth with the impact of causality. The most studies across on the 
panel data affirm the fact that financial development influence on growth and covariates of growth and the potential 

simultaneity, and unobserved country-specific growth. Likewise, the 71 countries period 1960-1995 using indicators 

of financial development by regarding different expects of trade and monitoring policies. (Adom & Kwakwa, 2014) 

They conclude on the positive influence between financial development on economic growth with trade and the 

implication of a change in policies and strategies with global tradition change. 

The non-tradable sector effect on the currency and different price issues similar to an export subsidy and 

import of tax by the foreign ministry of Ghana. We illustrate the literature from the great part of the exchange rate 

and the consequence of a different way of investment. There are several issues of the relationship between exchange 

rate and export value with misalignment and international trade. Hence, the part of the undervaluation of the 

exchange rate is different investing from which do not fully adjust their price of the evolution of the exchange rate. 

The vertical integration and importer currency network of large shapes in trade and investment. The final issue of 
the relationship between exchange rate and investment with trade and explored the effects of exchange with decision 

foreign ministry, especially they influence the investment rate and trade value of international trade. The prior 

research study is also showed the limited and largely focused contingency in the long period of overvalued. 

The trade policy may compensate for the different levels of currency and domestic firm exchange rate and 

lose competitiveness because of the exchange rate and an overvalued currency. The dispute of the exchange rate 

policies among trade partners creates the relationship between trade and investment. In more general, the countries 

use trade and substitute for the exchange rate with persistent disequilibria in a trade of business and investment. This 

paper main finding showed the exchange rate with a vitality which it does not affect international trade except in the 

occurrence of union and pegged exchange and trade rate in international market, the rate is not directly covert the 

country monitoring policy in the long term, its effect on the short term but the economy directly volatility the trade 

and investment for the long term. Second, the currency directly flows the relationship of the exchange rate and 

pegged the trade and investment in an international market by the misalignment which is directly affected on the 
cross of sustain issues. The currency undervaluation found and restrict import also effect on the investment policies 

with huge interaction of magnitude, and it across the currency and evidence of trade policy. Third, the fund evidence 

converts evidence of support and compensates for the overvalued currency policies. However, the policies seem to 

be the anti-dumping intervention of international trade and investment. (Amoako, Cobbinah, & Mensah Darkwah, 

2019) The recent persistence of the panel data affirms the fact that financial development influence on growth and 

covariates of growth and the potential simultaneity, and unobserved country-specific growth. Hence, the above 

countries indicators of financial development by regarding different expects of trade and monitoring policies and 

investment. (Frimpong Boamah & Sumberg, 2019) They conclude on the positive influence between financial 

development on economic growth with trade and the implication of change in policies and strategies with global 

tradition change. The recent imbalance in non-traditional trade and the effect of exchange rate restrictive measures 

international trade. (Brobbey, Pouliot, Hansen, & Kyereh, 2019) the presumption of investment indirectly in 
different public and private sectors are showed the presumption of the exchange rate with theoretical literature and 

trade investment. (Ayanoore, 2019; Gad et al., 2019) .    

We affect the volatility of the relationship of investment and trade and policy on the regression estimate on 

the panel datasets of these countries and in touch with other different countries whose policies only interact with 



www.acseusa.org/journal/index.php/aijbms     American International Journal of Business and Management Studies   Vol. 2, No. 1; 2020 

3 

 

misalignment affect trade policies decision. (Sovacool, 2019) we also discuss the method framework in the next 

section with a linear relationship of social inclusion and conversion factors change the implemented policies of 

nations, where the real price, trade, a technology, a price rate, and price level of ratio taking an important part of 

growth.  

The international trade could have driven by the different causality, which directly related to trade and their 

flow of exchange because we base the investment and trade on the proper finance policies with a legal interaction of 
foreign affairs. (Mullineux & Murinde, 2014) Therefore, the exchange rate compelling the argument of risk 

association of forwarding contact and currency option. Another critique of related sunk cost in export and 

investment. (Alhassan & Fiador, 2014) The higher fixed cost of investment and export are the volatility issues of 

international trade where the exchange rate is a critical issue of international trade. The cross-border transaction of 

the international firm in Ghana held and monitoring by under the private contract and the involvement of 

government also based on that private firms so international market the investment is a flow-on inside and not given 

directly benefit to individuals to the state.   

  

3. Methodology  
We base the paper method on World Bank indicators, which is undertaking in Ghana and focused on the critical 

issues of monitoring policies. In particular, the study sought to determine the influence of exchange rate and global 

trade evidence by Table 1, in which the trade policies have determined the social inclusion and equity with the 
public resource, building human resources and social protection for economic development has determined. We 

have analyzed the alternative DEC factors' annual exchange rate and also reported with the IMF’s international 

financial statistics by dollars. The exchange rate is determined by legally sanctioned an annual average income-

based. The purchasing power parity has been computed by a unit of the domestic market and the PPP conversion 

factor results got by the exchange rate of Ghana. The ratio also referred to the national level. The real price nominal 

effective rate and weighting average of several exchange rates are divided by a price deflator or index of cost. The 

merchandise trade as a share of GDP and merchandise exports with imports divided by the value of GDP in all 

current US. dollars. The high technology export targets the monitoring policies with high R&D intensity. The travel 

service determined the service economy which is used in one year and also include the good or services. Initially, by 

the linear state, we have computed the data in unit root and individually hypothesis each indicator.    

  
Table 1. Indicators 

 

Country 

Name 

Indicator  Indicator Name Indicator Code 

Ghana CPIA CPIA policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average 

(1=low to 6=high) 

IQ.CPA.SOCI.XQ 

Ghana DEC DEC alternative conversion factor (LCU per US$) PA.NUS.ATLS 

Ghana LCU Official exchange rate (LCU per US$, period average) PA.NUS.FCRF 

Ghana PLR Price level ratio of PPP conversion factor (GDP) to market 

exchange rate 

PA.NUS.PPPC.RF 

Ghana REX Real effective exchange rate index (2010 = 100) PX.REX.REER 

Ghana MT Merchandise trade (% of GDP) TG.VAL.TOTL.GD.ZS 

Ghana THE High-technology exports (% of manufactured exports) TX.VAL.TECH.MF.ZS 

Ghana TSC Travel services (% of commercial service exports) TX.VAL.TRVL.ZS.WT 

  

4. Results and Analysis 
  

Table 2. Mean deviation 

 

 CPIA DEC LCU MT PLR REX THE TSC 

 Mean 3.878571 0.829691 0.829399 54.82708 0.333163 335.0439 4.566921 25.94839 

 Median 3.9 0.18415 0.184172 54.08051 0.323188 109.9112 4.443817 8.795014 

 Maximum 4 4.5853 4.585325 93.19641 0.608276 3549.286 8.259932 77.20946 

 Minimum 3.7 0.000188 0.000115 25.3466 0.146365 64.66527 1.698087 0.347222 



www.acseusa.org/journal/index.php/aijbms     American International Journal of Business and Management Studies   Vol. 2, No. 1; 2020 

4 

 

 Std. Dev. 0.10509 1.248766 1.248978 15.22207 0.124527 676.9838 2.657452 27.5994 

 Skewness -0.387414 1.795421 1.794974 0.372768 0.184021 3.574841 0.363313 0.63838 

 Kurtosis 2.050271 5.268294 5.267016 3.177636 1.971886 15.61889 1.594373 1.676852 

 Jarque-Bera 0.876367 33.07204 33.04967 1.076859 1.440906 341.8259 0.730267 6.057327 

 Probability 0.645208 0 0 0.583664 0.486532 0 0.694104 0.04838 

 Sum 54.3 36.50641 36.49354 2412.391 9.66173 13066.71 31.96845 1115.781 

 Sum Sq. Dev. 0.143571 67.05493 67.07769 9963.595 0.434196 17415670 42.3723 31992.53 

 Observations 14 44 44 44 29 39 7 43 

  
They indicate table 2 the mean deviation with a standard deviation and shows the highest mean value of 

REX with CPIA, which shows a significant impact on monitoring policies. Table 3 analyzed the indicator summary 

with the different codes where the person test value shows 0. Table 4 is showing the test of equality. where the 

second-highest deviation in MT.  

  

Table 3. Tabulation summary of indicators 

 

Tabulation Summary    

     

Variable  Categories  

CPIA  5   

DEC  5   

LCU  5   

MT  4   

PLR  6   

REX  5   

THE  8   

TSC  5   

Product of Categories 600000   

     

Test Statistics df Value Prob 

Pearson X2 599964 6362469 0 

Likelihood Ratio G2 599964 420.7576 1 

  

Table 4. Test of equality 

 

Test for Equality of Means Between Series  

Sample: 1975 2018    

Included observations: 44   

     

Method  df Value Probability 

     

Anova F-test (7, 256) 7.279739 0 

Welch F-test* (7, 65.6711) 1364.163 0 

     

*Test allows for unequal cell variances  

     

     



www.acseusa.org/journal/index.php/aijbms     American International Journal of Business and Management Studies   Vol. 2, No. 1; 2020 

5 

 

Source of Variation df Sum of Sq. Mean Sq. 

     

Between  7 3475070 496438.5 

Within  256 17457804 68194.55 

     

Total  263 20932873 79592.67 

Category Statistics    

     

      

  

Std. Err. 

Variable Count Mean Std. Dev. of Mean 

CPIA 14 3.878571 0.10509 0.028087 

DEC 44 0.829691 1.248766 0.188259 

LCU 44 0.829399 1.248978 0.188291 

MT 44 54.82708 15.22207 2.294814 

PLR 29 0.333163 0.124527 0.023124 

REX 39 335.0439 676.9838 108.4042 

THE 7 4.566921 2.657452 1.004422 

TSC 43 25.94839 27.5994 4.208869 

All 264 63.4993 282.1217 17.36339 

  

         Table 5. Unit root test 

 

Null Hypothesis: Unit root (common unit root process)    

Series: CPIA, DEC, LCU, MT, PLR, REX, THE, TSC    

Sample: 1975 2018       

Exogenous variables: Individual effects     

Automatic selection of maximum lags     

Automatic lag length selection based on SIC: 0 to 4    

Newey-West automatic bandwidth selection and Bartlett kernel   

Total number of observations: 237     

Cross-sections included: 8      

        

Method    Statistic  Prob.**  

Levin, Lin & Chu t*   -6.41942  0  

** Probabilities are computed assuming asympotic normality   

Intermediate results on D(UNTITLED)     

 2nd Stage Variance HAC 

of  

 Max Band-  

Series Coefficient of Reg Dep. Lag Lag width Obs 

D(CPIA) -0.86486 0.0046 0.0037 1 1 1 11 

D(DEC) 0.54354 0.014 0.0148 4 9 2 38 

D(LCU) 0.54367 0.014 0.0148 4 9 2 38 

D(MT) -1.19398 133.81 6.8088 0 9 41 42 



www.acseusa.org/journal/index.php/aijbms     American International Journal of Business and Management Studies   Vol. 2, No. 1; 2020 

6 

 

D(PLR) -1.08333 0.0036 0.0005 0 5 13 27 

D(REX) -1.22533 281967 46476 0 9 26 37 

D(THE) -2.31254 0.4467 15.284 0 0 2 3 

D(TSC) -1.0286 122.17 24.487 0 9 10 41 

        

 Coefficient t-Stat SE Reg mu* sig*  Obs 

Pooled -1.13345 -13.579 1.318 -0.548 0.895  237 

  

It indicates table 5 the unit root test for the stationary factor individual and with 2nd coefficient determined 

the variance of HAC. The least-squares are shown in Table 6 with the dependent variable. The other two variables 

exclude a cause of a unit root. Fig 1 is showing the mean deviation of individual variables.  

 
Figure 1. Mean deviation 



www.acseusa.org/journal/index.php/aijbms     American International Journal of Business and Management Studies   Vol. 2, No. 1; 2020 

7 

 

Table 6. Least square 

 

Dependent Variable: DEC   

Method: Least Squares   

Sample (adjusted): 1990 2017   

Included observations: 28 after adjustments 

     

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.   

     

LCU 0.99996 1.35E-05 73956.32 0 

MT -1.71E-06 9.22E-07 -1.853493 0.0773 

PLR 2.33E-05 9.32E-05 0.250096 0.8048 

REX -1.19E-06 6.30E-07 -1.886635 0.0725 

TSC 4.07E-07 3.29E-07 1.238736 0.2285 

C 0.000249 0.000138 1.80822 0.0843 

R-squared 1     Mean dependent var 1.136611 

Adjusted R-squared 1     S.D. dependent var 1.21936 

S.E. of regression 3.61E-05     Akaike info criterion -17.4304 

Sum squared reside 2.87E-08     Schwarz criterion -17.14493 

Log likelihood 250.0257     Hannan-Quinn criter. -17.34313 

F-statistic 6.14E+09     Durbin-Watson stat 1.987947 

Prob(F-statistic) 0    

  

Table 7. Ramsey Test 

 

Ramsey RESET Test   

Equation: UNTITLED   

Specification: DEC LCU MT PLR REX TSC C 

Omitted Variables: Squares of fitted values 

    

 Value df Probability 

t-statistic 0.836358 21 0.4124 

F-statistic 0.699494 (1, 21) 0.4124 

Likelihood ratio 0.917463 1 0.3381 

    

F-test summary:   

 Sum of Sq. df Mean Squares 

Test SSR 9.27E-10 1 9.27E-10 



www.acseusa.org/journal/index.php/aijbms     American International Journal of Business and Management Studies   Vol. 2, No. 1; 2020 

8 

 

Restricted SSR 2.87E-08 22 1.31E-09 

Unrestricted SSR 2.78E-08 21 1.32E-09 

    

LR test summary:   

 Value   

Restricted LogL 250.0257   

Unrestricted LogL 250.4844   

  

Table 7 shows the test of restricted SSR and mean square with the 22 number of observations and tabulation of 

indicators has determined in Fig 2. T-test has computed in Table 8 and Table 9 is showing the ranger causality.The 

covariance relationship showing the relationship between indicators. Table 10 shows the residual factor individually 

determined in Fig 3.  

 
Figure 2. Tabulation of indicator 

  

Table 8. t-test 

 

Unrestricted Test Equation:   

Dependent Variable: DEC   

Method: Least Squares   

     

Variable Coefficient Std.Error t-Statistic Prob.   

     



www.acseusa.org/journal/index.php/aijbms     American International Journal of Business and Management Studies   Vol. 2, No. 1; 2020 

9 

 

LCU 1.000011 6.24E-05 16020.65 0 

MT -1.88E-06 9.50E-07 -1.976053 0.0614 

PLR -7.64E-05 0.000152 -0.503698 0.6197 

REX -8.22E-07 7.71E-07 -1.067055 0.2981 

TSC 1.26E-07 4.72E-07 0.267545 0.7917 

C 0.000232 0.00014 1.6555 0.1127 

FITTED^2 -9.89E-06 1.18E-05 -0.836358 0.4124 

     

R-squared 1     Mean dependent var 1.136611 

Adjusted R-squared 1     S.D. dependent var 1.21936 

S.E. of regression 3.64E-05     Akaike info criterion -17.39174 

Sum squared resid 2.78E-08     Schwarz criterion -17.05869 

Log likelihood 250.4844     Hannan-Quinn criter. -17.28992 

F-statistic 5.05E+09     Durbin-Watson stat 2.050199 

Prob(F-statistic) 0    

  

Table 9. Granger Causality 

 

Pairwise Granger Causality Tests 

Lags: 2    

    

 Null Hypothesis: Obs F-Statistic Prob.  

    

 DEC does not 

Granger Cause CPIA 

12 11.1375 0.0067 

 CPIA does not Granger Cause 

DEC 

1.35528 0.318 

    

 LCU does not 

Granger Cause CPIA 

12 11.137 0.0067 

 CPIA does not Granger Cause 

LCU 

1.35531 0.318 

    

 MT does not 

Granger Cause CPIA 

12 1.86558 0.2242 

 CPIA does not Granger Cause 

MT 

0.17201 0.8454 

    

 PLR does not 

Granger Cause CPIA 

12 2.28497 0.1723 

 CPIA does not Granger Cause 0.46151 0.6482 



www.acseusa.org/journal/index.php/aijbms     American International Journal of Business and Management Studies   Vol. 2, No. 1; 2020 

10 

 

PLR 

    

 REX does not Granger 
Cause CPIA 

12 7.15632 0.0203 

 CPIA does not Granger Cause 

REX 

1.32846 0.3243 

    

 THE does not Granger 

Cause CPIA 

3  NA  NA 

 CPIA does not Granger Cause 

THE 

 NA  NA 

    

 TSC does not Granger 
Cause CPIA 

11 2.14637 0.1981 

 CPIA does not Granger Cause 

TSC 

1.40867 0.3151 

    

 LCU does not Granger 

Cause DEC 

42 0.07055 0.932 

 DEC does not Granger Cause 

LCU 

0.06758 0.9348 

    

 MT does not Granger 

Cause DEC 

42 0.36388 0.6974 

 DEC does not Granger Cause MT 0.21054 0.8111 

    

 PLR does not Granger 

Cause DEC 

27 6.6503 0.0055 

 DEC does not Granger Cause 

PLR 

0.93937 0.406 

    

 REX does not Granger 

Cause DEC 

37 0.06702 0.9353 

 DEC does not Granger Cause 

REX 

0.0858 0.918 

    

 THE does not Granger 

Cause DEC 

3  NA  NA 

 DEC does not Granger Cause 

THE 

 NA  NA 

    

 TSC does not Granger 
Cause DEC 

41 2.30762 0.114 

 DEC does not Granger Cause 

TSC 

1.88969 0.1658 

    

 MT does not Granger 

Cause LCU 

42 0.35945 0.7005 

 LCU does not Granger Cause MT 0.20806 0.8131 



www.acseusa.org/journal/index.php/aijbms     American International Journal of Business and Management Studies   Vol. 2, No. 1; 2020 

11 

 

    

 PLR does not Granger 

Cause LCU 

27 6.65019 0.0055 

 LCU does not Granger Cause 

PLR 

0.93944 0.406 

    

 REX does not Granger 

Cause LCU 

37 0.06546 0.9368 

 LCU does not Granger Cause 

REX 

0.08564 0.9181 

    

 THE does not Granger 

Cause LCU 

3  NA  NA 

 LCU does not Granger Cause 

THE 

 NA  NA 

    

 TSC does not Granger 

Cause LCU 

41 2.31138 0.1137 

 LCU does not Granger Cause 

TSC 

1.89108 0.1656 

    

 PLR does not Granger 

Cause MT 

27 2.48218 0.1066 

 MT does not Granger Cause PLR 1.36785 0.2755 

    

 REX does not Granger 

Cause MT 

37 2.15837 0.132 

 MT does not Granger Cause REX 1.70868 0.1972 

    

 THE does not Granger 
Cause MT 

3  NA  NA 

 MT does not Granger Cause THE  NA  NA 

    

 TSC does not Granger 

Cause MT 

41 2.24547 0.1205 

 MT does not Granger Cause TSC 0.97516 0.3869 

    

 REX does not Granger 

Cause PLR 

27 2.37232 0.1167 

 PLR does not Granger Cause 

REX 

3.24392 0.0583 

    

 THE does not Granger 

Cause PLR 

3  NA  NA 

 PLR does not Granger Cause 

THE 

 NA  NA 

    

 TSC does not Granger 

Cause PLR 

26 1.39125 0.2708 



www.acseusa.org/journal/index.php/aijbms     American International Journal of Business and Management Studies   Vol. 2, No. 1; 2020 

12 

 

 PLR does not Granger Cause 

TSC 

2.49123 0.1069 

    

 THE does not Granger 

Cause REX 

3  NA  NA 

 REX does not Granger Cause 

THE 

 NA  NA 

    

 TSC does not Granger 

Cause REX 

36 0.20672 0.8144 

 REX does not Granger Cause 

TSC 

0.0816 0.9218 

    

 TSC does not Granger 

Cause THE 

2  NA  NA 

 THE does not Granger Cause 

TSC 

 NA  NA 

  
Figure 3: Residual 

Table 10. Covariance 

 

Covariance Analysis: Ordinary (uncentered)     

         

Covariance        

SSCP         

t-Statistic CPIA  DEC  LCU  MT  PLR  REX  THE  TSC  

CPIA  15.34833        



www.acseusa.org/journal/index.php/aijbms     American International Journal of Business and Management Studies   Vol. 2, No. 1; 2020 

13 

 

 92.09        

 -----         

         

DEC  9.66819 7.598494       

 58.00914 45.59096       

 4.493159 -----        

         

LCU  9.668307 7.598604 7.598713      

 58.00984 45.59162 45.59228      

 4.493104 117827.1 -----       

         

MT  225.082 131.755 131.7567 3439.153     

 1350.492 790.5298 790.54 20634.92     

 10.92232 3.145414 3.145399 -----      

         

PLR  1.875342 1.184778 1.184791 27.16776 0.232391    

 11.25205 7.108668 7.108743 163.0065 1.394348    

 18.76971 4.402432 4.402349 7.769044 -----     

         

REX  337.3352 203.5599 203.5624 5006.151 41.08372 7485.076   

 2024.011 1221.36 1221.374 30036.91 246.5023 44910.46   

 22.86413 3.6633 3.663269 13.56715 12.78949 -----    

         

THE  15.55299 9.702807 9.702915 232.7672 1.908802 335.1828 20.02387  

 93.31795 58.21684 58.21749 1396.603 11.45281 2011.097 120.1432  

 4.299181 2.848676 2.848651 4.29513 4.247352 3.868671 -----   

         

TSC  117.712 60.10517 60.10579 1801.242 14.37304 2685.906 112.8893 1053.608 

 706.2722 360.631 360.6348 10807.45 86.23826 16115.44 677.3357 6321.647 

 5.470541 2.027712 2.027697 6.542025 5.195568 7.325082 2.761902 -----  

  

 

5. Conclusion 
The results have been signifying the relationship and influence of monitoring policy on trade and foreign policies. 

We classify the above results in Table5-7. Therefore, the highly effected PLR has been creating an influence on 

THE, MT and TSC (Table 8) and showed a significant influence on the growth and internal policies of government 

issues. The method of the real price shows the nominal effective rate and weighting average of several exchange 

rates and it is divided by a price deflator or index of cost. Also, the monitoring policies with high R&D intensity. 

The travel service determined the service economy which used for one year and also includes goods or services. The 

expected outcomes of public policies and practice showed the influence of monitoring policies with comprehensive 

pioneering strategies of the exchange rate, the non-linarite and pass-through affect the volatility of Ghana’s. 2nd the 

economic growth and ramifications of global competitiveness are shows the significant effects on poverty reduction 

and growing economic wealth. The relevance of this study is to serve as powerful strategical tools showing the 
practicality effect on the sluggish growth rate.  However, the government has taken reserve, but the policies can 

change the magnitude of strength and policies. In we include last the exchange rate volatility to estimating growth 



www.acseusa.org/journal/index.php/aijbms     American International Journal of Business and Management Studies   Vol. 2, No. 1; 2020 

14 

 

under the control of endogenous and resulting in simulating lag dependency so, the yield estimation shows above the 

robustness and stability test by liner square and restricted with SSR and mean square. The tabulation of indicators 

determined the T-test computed in Granger causality. The prior most studies are showing the potential simultaneity 

and unobserved country-specific growth regarding the financial department and trade-in monitoring policies. 

Therefore, the tragic policies of government control the inflation situation by proper monitoring policies in exchange 

rates.    
  

References 

Acheampong, E., & Maryudi, A. (2020). Avoiding legality: Timber producers’ strategies and motivations under 

FLEGT in Ghana and Indonesia. Forest Policy and Economics, 111, 102047. 

doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.102047 

Adom, P. K., & Kwakwa, P. A. (2014). Effects of changing trade structure and technical characteristics of the 

manufacturing sector on energy intensity in Ghana. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 35, 475-

483. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.04.014 

Adu, G., Marbuah, G., & Mensah, J. T. (2013). Financial development and economic growth in Ghana: Does the 

measure of financial development matter? Review of Development Finance, 3(4), 192-203. 

doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rdf.2013.11.001 

Agusto, F. B., & Khan, M. A. (2018). Optimal control strategies for dengue transmission in pakistan. Mathematical 
Biosciences, 305, 102-121. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mbs.2018.09.007 

Ahmed, A., Korah, P. I., Dongzagla, A., Nunbogu, A. M., Niminga-Beka, R., Kuusaana, E. D., & Abubakari, Z. 

(2020). City profile: Wa, Ghana. Cities, 97, 102524. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.102524 

Alhassan, A. L., & Fiador, V. (2014). Insurance-growth nexus in Ghana: An autoregressive distributed lag bounds 

cointegration approach. Review of Development Finance, 4(2), 83-96. 

doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rdf.2014.05.003 

Amoako, C., Cobbinah, P. B., & Mensah Darkwah, R. (2019). Complex twist of fate: The geopolitics11Geopolitics 

is used in this paper to refer to the way that geography of vulnerable communities affects political 

interventions in terms of flood management regimes of flood management regimes in Accra, 

Ghana. Cities, 89, 209-217. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.02.006 

Amri, F. (2017). Intercourse across economic growth, trade and renewable energy consumption in developing and 
developed countries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 69, 527-534. 

doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.230 

Ayanoore, I. (2019). The politics of local content implementation in Ghana’s oil and gas sector. The Extractive 

Industries and Society. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2019.11.004 

Bond, S. R., Söderbom, M., & Wu, G. (2011). Pursuing the wrong options? Adjustment costs and the relationship 

between uncertainty and capital accumulation. Economics Letters, 111(3), 249-251. 

doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2011.01.020 

Brobbey, L. K., Pouliot, M., Hansen, C. P., & Kyereh, B. (2019). Factors influencing participation and income 

from charcoal production and trade in Ghana. Energy for Sustainable Development, 50, 69-81. 

doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2019.03.003 

Frimpong Boamah, E., & Sumberg, J. (2019). The long overhang of bad decisions in agro-industrial development: 

Sugar and tomato paste in Ghana. Food Policy, 89, 101786. 
doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2019.101786 

Gad, M., Lord, J., Chalkidou, K., As are, B., Lettered, M. G., & Ruiz, F. (2019). Supporting the Development of 

Evidence-Informed Policy Options: An Economic Evaluation of Hypertension Management in 

Ghana. Value in Health. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2019.09.2749 

Herrerias, M. J., Cuadros, A., & Luo, D. (2016). Foreign versus indigenous innovation and energy intensity: 

Further research across Chinese regions. Applied Energy, 162, 1374-1384. 

doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.01.042 

Khanal, P. N., Grebner, D. L., Straka, T. J., & Adams, D. C. (2019). Obstacles to participation in carbon 

sequestration for nonindustrial private forest landowners in the southern United States: A diffusion of 

innovations perspective. Forest Policy and Economics, 100, 95-101. 

doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2018.11.007 
Kong, Y., & Khan, R. (2019). To examine environmental pollution by economic growth and their impact in an 

environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) among developed and developing countries. PloS one, 14(3). 

doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209532 

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.102047
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.04.014
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rdf.2013.11.001
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mbs.2018.09.007
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.102524
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rdf.2014.05.003
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.02.006
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.230
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2019.11.004
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2011.01.020
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2019.03.003
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2019.101786
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2019.09.2749
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.01.042
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2018.11.007
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209532


www.acseusa.org/journal/index.php/aijbms     American International Journal of Business and Management Studies   Vol. 2, No. 1; 2020 

15 

 

Lin, B., & Agyeman, S. D. (2019). Assessing Ghana’s carbon dioxide emissions through energy consumption 

structure towards a sustainable development path. Journal of Cleaner Production, 238, 117941. 

doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117941 

Mensah, J. T., & Botchway, E. (2013). Ghana’s salt industry: A neglected sector for economic 

development? Resources Policy, 38(3), 288-294. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2013.06.002 

Mullineux, A. W., & Murinde, V. (2014). Financial sector policies for enterprise development in Africa. Review of 
Development Finance, 4(2), 66-72. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rdf.2014.05.001 

Murtazashvili, I., Murtazashvili, J., & Salahodjaev, R. (2019). Trust and deforestation: A cross-country 

comparison. Forest Policy and Economics, 101, 111-119. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.02.001 

Sovacool, B. K. (2019). Toxic transitions in the lifecycle externalities of a digital society: The complex afterlives of 

electronic waste in Ghana. Resources Policy, 64, 101459. 

doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.101459 

Traoré, S. (2019). Residential location choice in a developing country: What matter? A choice experiment 

application in Burkina Faso. Forest Policy and Economics, 102, 1-9. 

doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.01.021 

Uddin, G. S., Sjö, B., & Shahbaz, M. (2013). The causal nexus between financial development and economic 

growth in Kenya. Economic Modelling, 35, 701-707. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2013.08.031 

  
 

 

Copyrights  

Copyright for this article is retained by the author(s), with first publication rights granted to the journal. This is an 

open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license 

(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). 

 

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117941
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2013.06.002
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rdf.2014.05.001
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.02.001
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.101459
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.01.021
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2013.08.031

