




































American International Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences  

Vol. 1, No. 1; 2019 

Published by American Center of Science and Education, USA 

 

1 

 

 

 

United States, Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Middle East Politics After 

Khashoggi’s Murder 

 

Yusuf Ibrahim Gamawa 

Department of Political Science 

Bauchi State University, Nigeria 

Email: yusufgamawa@ymail.com   

 

Received: January 9, 2019      Accepted: January 13, 2019              Online Published: January 24, 2019      

   

Abstract 

There is no doubt that the murder of Jamal Khashoggi has brought about dramatic changes in the politics 

of the Middle East, and the key players; U.S., Saudi Arabia and Turkey are all playing different roles in 

shaping opinion in the region in the aftermath of the murder. While Turkey continues to push for justice 

for the murder of the journalist, the U.S. is seen to be divided between support for Saudi Arabia and call 

for justice, and Saudi Arabia on its part is pushing hard to see that it overcomes all attempts to undermine 

its government and leadership. This article argues that the murder of the journalist has pushed Saudi 

Arabia into taking steps that would ensure its survival and dominance in the region. The Saudi regime 

appears to be stepping up its power in the region and has reached out to neighbors and renewed its ties 

with its Gulf partners and wider Middle East, including Syria to neutralize all attempts by Turkey to 

undermine its regime. 

 

 Keywords: U.S.. Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Middle East, Politics 

The murder of Saudi U.S. based journalist at the Saudi Consulate in Istanbul has continued to generate reactions 

across the world. The murder itself has remained mysterious, especially since the journalist’s body is yet to be seen 

despite confirmation that he has actually been killed. The Saudi regime was blamed by Turkey and Crown Prince 

MBS was later fingered by the CIA to have ordered the killing [The Guardian, 17.11.2018]. Saudi Arabia has denied 

the involvement of MBS but has arrested people it considered responsible for horrendous crime. Turkey on its part 

has demanded the repatriation and trial of the suspects in Turkey, a request that was turned down by Saudi Arabia. 

And in all these, the U.S. is being looked up to by both Turkey and Saudi Arabia for justice. 

Since the killing, the U.S. Secretary of State was dispatched by President Trump to Saudi Arabia to verify and look 

into how the murder happened. And Mike Pompeo went to Ankara and then back to the U.S. without pointing any 

accusing fingers. Donald Trump emerged to say that MBS was not involved even though at some point it became 

clear that Saudi Arabia was responsible. Trump made clear that even if Saudi Arabia is culpable in the murder, the 

U.S. is not willing to jeopardize its age old relation with the Saudis. It was the U.S. Senate that pursued the matter 

and the CIA released its findings, saying MBS ordered the killing. The U.S. Senate issued a resolution that accussed 

MBS of the murder and threatened sanctions against Saudi Arabia not only for its role in the murder of the journalist 

but also for its involvement in the war in Yemen and its accompanying humanitarian crises [C. Foran, T. Barrett, M. 

Raju, 14.12.2018]. Saudi Arabia on its part criticized the U.S. Senate for accusing the Crown Prince of ordering the 

killing of the journalist. Saudi foreign ministry insisted that the claims by the U.S. Senate remain unsubstantiated 

mailto:yusufgamawa@ymail.com


www.acseusa.org/journal/index.php/aijhass            American International Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences     Vol. 1, No. 1; 2019 

 

2 

 

 

and saw such as dabbling into the affairs of the Kingdom and undermining its regional and international role [K. 

Smith, K. Sullivan, 17.12.2018]. 

Turkey has remained unhappy on the stance of the U.S. in the matter, and has continued its campaign for justice 

over the murder of the journalist who was engaged to a Turkish citizen Hatice before he was killed. Hatice herself 

had appeared in many television programs, including BBC, appealing for justice [https://m.youtube.com, 

29.10.2018]. The murder had been condemned by almost all countries across the globe, and particularly by western 

nations. Many European states threatened sanctions or travel ban on Saudi officials involved in the matter. The 

expectations and hopes of Turkey with regards to justice, is for the perpetrators to be brought and tried in Turkish 

courts. This is the justice that seems most fitting to the Saudi killers. However, the fact that the culprits had found 

their way out of Turkey after committing the murders seems highly unlikely that Saudi Arabia will accept a trial in 

Ankara. And from all indications there is no force that can force Saudi Arabia to comply with such demands and 

even if there is, it is not forth coming and so what do we expect? 

The Israeli Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu had while commenting on the matter reiterated the importance of 

Saudi Arabia and the special position its enjoys across the world as sacred place for Muslims. Netanyahu maintained 

that in the interest of peace, thought not supporting the murder, Netanyahu was quoted in the Haaretz news of 

12.12.2018 saying ‘what happened in Istanbul is nothing short of horrific. But it is balanced by the importance of 

Saudi Arabia’. Netanyahu insisted that destabilizing Saudi Arabia could destabilize the world [Noa Landau, 

12.12.2018]. There is absolutely no doubt about Netanyahu’s assertion that destabilizing Saudi Arabia would 

destabilize the world. And it is absolutely understood that nobody or nation will ever support such gruesome murder. 

However, international law itself has its flaws, and the idea of nation states, and of sovereignty, has given protection 

to states and as a result wisdom will have to be put to use to deal with certain issues in international politics. 

Saudi Arabia in trying to survive, has found itself taking certain measures and behaving a certain different ways. 

While Turkey continues with its campaign for justice across the globe, the Saudi regime began to undertake a 

proactive foreign policy, relying on soft power as seen in the tour of Arab states by MBS shortly before the G20 

meeting. MBS visited Bahrain, UAE, Egypt, Tunisia and Algeria before heading to Argentina for the G20 meeting 

[Seth J. F., 11.29.2018]. The tour by MBS was to gain support of Arab neighbors with regards to the international 

condemnation of Saudi Arabia by western nations.  After MBS’s return from Argentina, King Salman summoned 

the GCC countries to a meeting in Riyadh. It was at the meeting that a new Chief of the region’s joint military 

command was announced. Lt General Eid Awwad Al Shulawi, a former Commander of the  Saudi Royal Land 

Forces was announced as the new Chief and member states made a commitment to work together to achieve 

regional security and stability [Naser Al Wasmi, 9.12.2018]. 

 The summit lasted just a day and was attended by all GCC states. Qatar, a GCC member with close ties to Turkey 

and Iran was invited, and the invitation was seen as a move by Saudi Arabia to normalize relations with the state 

after a blockade on the Gulf state by Saudi Arabia in 2017. Turkey is said to have a military base in Qatar. And 

during the diplomatic row between Saudi Arabia and Qatar, Turkey’s parliament approved the deployment of about 

3,000 troops to Qatar [Al Jazeera, 26.12.2017]. The Riyadh meeting discussed the need for economic integration in 

the region and deal with other issues affecting the region, including the war in Yemen. All GCC states of Bahrain, 

Kuwait, Oman, Saudi Arabia and the UAE were represented by their rulers except Qatar, which was sent its foreign 

minister to represent its Amir. All the countries expressed full support to the measures taken by Saudi Arabia 

concerning the murder of Jamal Kahashoggi. And in response to the condemnation of Saudi Arabia, the GCC 

maintained that they reject ‘the exploitation of the issue to prejudice the sovereignty, security and stability of Saudi 

Arabia, an integral part of the security and stability of the Gulf Cooperation Council’ [Gulf News, 9.12.2018]. 

Saudi Arabia appeared to have reached out to its regional allies for support despite counting on U.S. support and 

specifically that of President Trump, which had been all too clear all along. However, by far, a step taken by Saudi 

Arabia diplomatically and that puts it in a position of advantage is its offer to rebuild Syria. Saudi Arabia had not 



www.acseusa.org/journal/index.php/aijhass            American International Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences     Vol. 1, No. 1; 2019 

 

3 

 

 

been involved in Syria. The U.S., Iran, Russia and Turkey have been the countries that have been involved in Syria, 

and struggled for influence and control in the country. U.S. President Donald Trump revealed on his twitter handle 

that Saudi Arabia has agreed to pay the necessary money needed to rebuild the war torn country [Al Jazeera, 

25.12.2018]. At the moment, the U.S. is pulling out its troops from Syria but is dealing with a problem that concerns 

its two allies in Syria; the YPG Kurdish fighters and Turkey, its NATO ally. The United States insists that its pull 

out must be backed by a guarantee of safety for the YPG Kurds by Turkey. Turkey on its part considers the YPG a 

terrorist group that is linked to the PKK, another Kurdish group in Turkey that it also considers a terrorist group. 

Turkey has disagreed with the U.S. demand for protection to the YPG and there has been a deadlock on the issue 

between Turkey and the U.S.  Turkey issued a statement on 10.01.2019 that it will go ahead with its planned 

offensive against the Kurds in North eastern Syria whether the U.S. pulls out or not [CNBC, 10.01.2019]. Clearly a 

confrontation or disagreement of some sort is developing between the two countries. And in all this, which country 

will have more influence in Syria in the aftermath of the Syrian war, especially between Saudi Arabia that will help 

rebuild the country and Turkey a military actor in the Syrian war? Is Saudi Arabia reasserting its power in the 

Middle East in the aftermath of the Khashoggi murder? 

References 

The Guardian, CIA Finds Saudi Crown Prince ordered Jamal Khashoggi Killing-Report, www.theguardian.com  

17.11.2018. 

C. Foran, T. Barrett, M.Raju, Senate Rebukes Trump, Condemns Saudi Crown Prince for Khashoggi Murder, CNN 

Politics, www.edition-m.cnn.com , 14,12,2018.  

K. Smith, K. Sullivan, Saudi Arabia Rebukes US Senate Resolution Condemning Saudi Crown Prince for 

Khashoggi Murder, CNN Politics, www.edition-m.cnn.com , 17,12.2018. 

Jamal Khashoggi’s Fiancee, Hatice Cengiz on Murder-BBC, https://m.youtube.com , 29.10.2018. 

Noa Landau, Netanyahu on Khashoggi Murder: Destabilizing Saudi Arabia Would Destabilize the World, 

www.haaretz.com, 12.12.2018. 

Seth J.F., All Eyes On Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed Bin Salman at G20, The Jerusalem Post, 11.29,18. 

Naser Al Wasmi, GCC Appoints New Chief of Joint Military Command at Riyadh Summit, The National, 9.12.18. 

Al Jazeera, Turkey Sends More Troops to Qatar, 26.12.18. 

Gulf News,, King Salman Inaugurates the 39th GCC Summit in Riyadh, 9.12.2018. 

Al Jazeera, Trump: Saudi to ‘Pay Necessary Money’ to Help Rebuild Syria, 25.12.18. 

CNBC, Turkey Will Attack Kurdish Fighters in Syria Regardless of US Withdrawal, Foreign Minister Says, 

10.01.19. 

 

 

 

 

Copyrights  

Copyright for this article is retained by the author(s), with first publication rights granted to the journal. This is an 

open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license 

(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). 

 

 

http://www.theguardian.com/
http://www.edition-m.cnn.com/
http://www.edition-m.cnn.com/
https://m.youtube.com/
http://www.haaretz.com/

