




































AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH 15(2) (2024), 1-11 

 

1 

 

MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH  
AIJMSR VOL 15 NO 2 (2024) P-ISSN 2638-1249   E-ISSN 2638-1273 

Journal homepage: https://www.cribfb.com/journal/index.php/aijmsr 

Published by American Multidisciplinary Scientific Society, USA 

AN ANALYSIS ON THE ROLE OF STOCK BROKERAGE HOUSES 

IN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT                                    
            

 Tahrima Haque Beg (a)1  Taskin Afrina  (b)  Miftahul Hridoy (c)  Md. Abir Hossen  (d )   Rashel Hossain  (e) 

            
 

 (a)Assistant Professor, Department of Agricultural Finance and Management, Sher-E-Bangla Agricultural University, Bangladesh; E-mail: 

tahrima.beg.fin@siu.edu.bd 
 (b)Assistant Professor, Department of Agricultural Finance and Management, Sher-E-Bangla Agricultural University, Bangladesh; E-mail: 

taskin_mgt@sau.edu.bd 
 (c) Bachelor of Business Administration, Daffodil International University, Bangladesh; E-mail: hridoy11-1801@s.diu.edu.bd 
 (d) Bachelor of Business Administration, Daffodil International University, Bangladesh; E-mail: abir11-6434@diu.edu.bd 
 (e) Bachelor of Business Administration, Daffodil International University, Bangladesh; E-mail: rashel11-1088@diu.edu.bd 

 

 
A R T I C L E I N F O 

      
 

Article History: 
 

Received: 31st March 2024 
Reviewed & Revised: 1st April  

to 12th June 2024 

Accepted: 15th June 2024 

Published: 24th June 2024 

 
Keywords: 

Stock Brokerage House, Community 

Development, Capital Market, Socio-

Economic Impact. 

 
       JEL Classification Codes:  

 

       G20, G23, O16, R51 

 
      Peer-Review Model:  

 

      External peer-review was done through  

      double-blind method 

        

 
A B S T R A C T 

 

This study investigates the role of stock brokerage houses in community development within the context 
of Bangladesh's capital market. Data and information are sourced from a variety of secondary sources, 
encompassing financial platforms like the Dhaka Stock Exchange (DSE) and Chittagong Stock Exchange 
(CSE), credible news websites such as Investing.com, published literature, and official reports from 
regulatory authorities such as the Bangladesh Bank and the Bangladesh Securities and Exchange 
Commission (BSEC). Quantitative data spanning the period from 2010 to 2019 are meticulously 
extracted from stock exchange databases as well as the IMF World Economic Outlook database. These 
datasets are meticulously structured and analyzed using tables, charts, and graphs. Amidst challenges 
such as market collapses and the COVID-19 pandemic, the resilience and growth of Bangladesh's capital 
market are evaluated. The results reveal that brokerage houses have a significant impact on community 
development in Bangladesh. For instance, the total traded volume reached Tk. 2,169,597 million in 2017, 
marking an 82.08% increase from the previous year. Sector-wise turnover data showed consistent 
investment trends, particularly in manufacturing, financials, and pharmaceuticals. These investments 
have led to job creation and infrastructure development, highlighting the role of brokerage houses in 
fostering employment and socioeconomic advancement. Additionally, the adoption of online trading 
platforms has driven technological advancement and financial inclusion. The findings of this study 
suggest that brokerage houses are crucial intermediaries in the capital market, contributing to economic 
growth, financial inclusion, and community development through their investment activities and 
corporate social responsibility initiatives. 

 
 

© 2024 by the authors. Licensee American Multidisciplinary Scientific Society, USA. This article is 
an open-access article  distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons 
Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).  

 

INTRODUCTION 

In the vibrant economic landscape of Bangladesh, the capital market stands as a beacon of financial growth and opportunity, 

catalyzing the nation's journey toward prosperity. It serves as a critical pathway for directing funds from investors to 

businesses, fueling growth, fostering entrepreneurship, and contributing to the nation's overall prosperity. At the heart of 

this bustling marketplace are the brokerage houses, integral intermediaries that facilitate the smooth functioning of the 

capital market, connecting investors with opportunities and providing essential services to both individual and institutional 

clients. (Bazaluk et al., 2024). The roots of Bangladesh's capital market trace back to the mid-20th century when the Dhaka 

Stock Exchange (DSE) was established in 1954. This historic milestone marked the beginning of a journey towards creating 

a robust financial ecosystem that could cater to the evolving needs of a growing economy. Over time, the capital market 

expanded its horizons with the establishment of the Chittagong Stock Exchange (CSE) in 1995, adding another layer of 

richness to the nation's financial infrastructure. Since its inception, the capital market has played a pivotal role in mobilizing 

savings, allocating capital efficiently, and promoting corporate governance. It provides a platform for companies to raise 

funds through the issuance of securities such as stocks and bonds, enabling them to finance expansion, undertake new 

projects, and innovate. Simultaneously, it offers investors a diverse array of investment opportunities, ranging from stocks 

and bonds to mutual funds and derivatives, allowing them to diversify their portfolios and optimize returns. (Bazaluk et al., 

                                                      
1Corresponding author: ORCID ID: 0000-0003-0149-5968 

© 2024 by the authors. Hosting by American Multidisciplinary Scientific Society. Peer review under responsibility of American Multidisciplinary 
Scientific Society, USA.  

https://doi.org/10.46281/aijmsr.v15i2.2218 

 
To cite this article: Beg, T. H., Afrina, T., Hridoy, M., Hossen, M. A., & Hossain, R. (2024). AN ANALYSIS ON THE ROLE OF STOCK BROKERAGE 

HOUSES IN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT. American International Journal of Multidisciplinary Scientific Research, 15(2), 1-11. 

https://doi.org/10.46281/aijmsr.v15i2.2218 

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
https://www.openaccess.nl/en
https://doi.org/10.46281/aijmsr.v15i2.2218
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0149-5968
https://orcid.org/0009-0003-7202-8029
https://orcid.org/0009-0003-7679-6332
https://orcid.org/0009-0005-7105-0608
https://orcid.org/0009-0009-1834-4331


Beg et al., American International Journal of Multidisciplinary Scientific Research 15(2) (2024), 1-11

  

2 

 

2024). At the heart of the capital market's operations lie the brokerage houses, often referred to as stockbrokers or brokerage 

firms. These entities act as intermediaries between investors and the market, facilitating the buying and selling of securities 

on behalf of their clients. They provide a range of services, including trade execution, investment advice, research, and 

portfolio management, catering to the diverse needs of investors across different risk profiles and investment horizons. 

Brokerage houses serve as the primary point of contact for investors looking to participate in the capital market. Whether 

individuals seeking to invest their savings for long-term growth or institutional investors managing large portfolios, 

brokerage houses play a crucial role in helping clients navigate the complexities of the market, make informed investment 

decisions, and execute trades efficiently (Zayed et al., 2022e; Ali et al., 2020; Ali et al., 2021). Beyond their facilitative role, 

brokerage houses also enhance market liquidity, price discovery, and market efficiency. Their active participation in trading 

ensures smooth market functioning, transparent pricing, and fair trading of securities, thereby attracting investors and 

fostering market development. Furthermore, brokerage houses promote financial literacy and investor education through 

various channels such as workshops, seminars, publications, and online resources. By educating investors about investment 

options, risk management, and market dynamics, they empower individuals to make informed financial decisions aligned 

with their goals and risk tolerance, thus contributing to a more knowledgeable and confident investor base. (Rubi et al., 

2022). Despite their pivotal role in the capital market ecosystem, the specific contributions of brokerage houses to 

community development initiatives have received limited attention in existing research. While numerous studies (Mia et al., 

2023) have explored the broader impact of financial institutions on economic development, however, there is a lack of 

research on the role of brokerage houses in community development in Bangladesh. This research seeks to address this gap 

by conducting a comprehensive analysis of the role of brokerage houses in community development in Bangladesh. This 

study aims to shed light on the mechanisms through which brokerage houses influence community development efforts and 

contribute to inclusive growth and sustainable development by examining their operations, strategies, and impact within the 

broader context of socioeconomic development. Through a comprehensive utilization of secondary data sources, including 

financial platforms such as the Dhaka Stock Exchange (DSE), Chittagong Stock Exchange (CSE), and Investing.com, news 

websites, publications, and official documents like monthly reviews from the DSE spanning the period from 2010 to 2019, 

this research endeavors to explore the multifaceted role of brokerage houses in community development within the context 

of Bangladesh's capital market. It aims to identify best practices, challenges, and opportunities for brokerage houses to 

enhance their positive impact on local communities and contribute to the socio-economic advancement of Bangladesh. In 

essence, this study not only endeavors to advance knowledge in the field but also strives to provide valuable insights for 

policymakers, practitioners, and stakeholders in the financial sector. By addressing these objectives, it aspires to foster a 

deeper understanding of the intersection between finance and community development, ultimately contributing to 

Bangladesh's ongoing journey toward economic prosperity and social well-being. 

The paper is structured as follows: after an introduction highlighting the importance of brokerage houses in 

Bangladesh's capital market and the gap in research on their role in community development, a literature review is conducted 

to establish a theoretical context. Next, the methodology for investigating brokerage houses' impact on community 

development is detailed. Findings are presented and discussed, followed by a concise conclusion summarizing key insights 

and suggesting future research directions. Finally, the references section provides a comprehensive list of sources cited 

throughout the paper, ensuring transparency, and facilitating further exploration of the topic. 

 

LITERATURE REVIEW 

Community development is a multifaceted endeavor aimed at improving the social, economic, and environmental well-

being of a place and its residents (Shaw, 2008). Financial institutions play a crucial role in this process by providing access 

to capital, a key driver of economic growth and opportunity (Wu et al., 2010; Zayed et al., 2021b; Zayed et al., 2022a; 

Zayed et al., 2022b; Zayed et al., 2022c; Zayed et al., 2022d; Zayed et al., 2022e., Bhuiyan et al., 2022; Shayery et al., 

2022; Khan, et al., 2023; Edeh et al., 2023). However, the specific role of stock brokerage houses in fostering community 

development remains an under-researched area (Al-Imran et al., 2023). This literature review delves into existing 

scholarship on community development, acknowledges the limited focus on stock brokerages, and explores potential 

avenues for their contribution. Extensive research highlights the importance of various factors in fostering community 

development (Mohamed et al., 2022). Access to capital, as facilitated by financial institutions, sits at the heart of this 

discourse (Al-Imran et al., 2023). Studies by (Haini, 2019) emphasize how financial inclusion, enabling individuals and 

small businesses to access loans and investments, fuels economic activity and job creation (Ayanle et al., 2022; Kabir et 

al., 2021; Nayeen et al., 2020; Nahar et al., 2021; Rahman et al., 2021a; Rahman  et al., 2021b; Shahriar 2021a; Shahriar 

2021b). Additionally, research (Shamsa Kanwal et al., 2020) underlines the role of infrastructure development and social 

services offered by various institutions in creating a thriving community. While the contribution of financial institutions to 

community development is well-established, the specific role of stock brokerage houses remains relatively unexplored 

(Mohamed et al., 2022). Existing research primarily focuses on traditional institutions like banks and credit unions (Al-

Imran et al., 2022). A notable exception is the work by (Benjamin et al., 2004) who explore the concept of Community 

Development Financial Institutions (CDFIs) specializing in providing financial services to underserved communities. 

Despite limited research, stock brokerage houses hold significant potential to contribute to community development 

(Mridha et al., 2023; Chowdhury et al., 2020; Chowdhury et al., 2021a; S. Chowdhury et al., 2021b; Iqbal et al., 2021; 

Kader et al., 2019; Kader et al., 2021a; Kader et al., 2021b). This potential can be realized through various avenues, 

including Stock brokerages can offer educational programs on financial planning and investing to community members, 

empowering them to make informed financial decisions and potentially participate in the stock market. (Groth et al., 1979). 

Brokerages could facilitate investments in local businesses and real estate projects, directing capital towards community 



Beg et al., American International Journal of Multidisciplinary Scientific Research 15(2) (2024), 1-11

  

3 

 

development initiatives (Chowdhury et al., 2022; Zayed et al., 2021a; and Zayed et al., 2021b; Ahmed et al., 2022; Al-

Quraan et al., 2022; Faisal-E-Alam et al., 2022; Mia et al., 2022; Rubi et al., 2022; Zayed et al., 2021a). Stock brokerages 

could direct a portion of their profits or partner with existing organizations to support community development projects 

such as educational programs or infrastructure upgrades. (Hasan, 2023). This literature review highlights the centrality of 

community development and the role of financial institutions. While existing research explores traditional institutions, 

(Groth et al., 1979) the role of stock brokerage houses remains largely unexamined. This study aims to fill this gap by 

investigating potential avenues for stock brokerages to contribute to community development. By furthering our 

understanding of these linkages, we can pave the way for more inclusive and impactful community development strategies. 

 

MATERIALS & METHODS 

Study Design  

This study employs a multi-source approach to ensure comprehensive data collection and analysis. The primary objective 

is to investigate the role of stock brokerage houses in community development within the context of Bangladesh's capital 

market. The following subsections outline the data sources and methodology utilized in this study: 

 

Sample Procedure  

Data and information pertinent to the research objectives are gathered from secondary sources. The selection of sources is 

guided by their relevance, reliability, and accessibility. The primary sources include:  

 

Financial Platforms: Data from reputable financial platforms such as the Dhaka Stock Exchange (DSE), Chittagong Stock 

Exchange (CSE), and Investing.com are leveraged to obtain real-time market data, company profiles, and financial 

performance metrics.  

 

News, Websites, and Publications: Information regarding market trends, regulatory changes, and industry developments is 

sourced from credible news websites and publications. This includes articles from financial news outlets, research studies, 

and reports from regulatory authorities such as the Bangladesh Bank and the Bangladesh Securities and Exchange 

Commission (BSEC).  

 

Official Publications: Monthly reviews and publications released by the DSE are consulted to access historical market data, 

performance summaries, and regulatory update. 

 

Data Organization and Analysis 

Quantitative data are extracted from reliable sources, including stock exchange databases, the IMF World Economic Outlook 

database, and Investing.com. These data encompass various indicators related to market performance, financial trends, and 

community development initiatives. To facilitate interpretation and analysis, the data are organized using tables, charts, and 

graphs.  

 

Tables: Key data points are summarized in tabular format to provide a concise overview of relevant metrics, such as 

brokerage house performance, market indices, and community development initiatives.  

 

Charts and Graphs: Visual representations, including line graphs, bar charts, and pie charts, are utilized to illustrate trends, 

patterns, and relationships within the data. These visual aids enhance the clarity and accessibility of the findings. 

 

RESULTS 

Capital Market Analysis: 2010-2019 

This section provides a comprehensive analysis of the capital market dynamics in Bangladesh spanning the period from 

2010 to 2019. 

 

Market Overview 

 

2010 
In December 2010, Bangladesh's capital market predominantly revolved around equity-based transactions. The introduction 

of the DSE General Index (DGEN) on November 27, 2001, marked a pivotal moment, with an initial base index of 817.62 

points, excluding z-category companies. Notably, the month witnessed a trading volume of 2,275.48 million shares, valued 

at Tk. 387,174.09 million. Despite a 1.89% increase in volume, there was a notable 17.92% decrease in value compared to 

the previous month. The average daily transactions stood at 117.54 million shares and Tk. 18,436.86 million in volume and 

value, respectively. Additionally, the market capitalization of all listed securities decreased to Tk. 3,508.01 billion from Tk. 

3,598.33 billion in the preceding month. 

 

2011 
Despite market fluctuations, the performance of listed securities, particularly in terms of simple average dividends, 

showcased improvement in 2011 compared to the preceding five years. Noteworthy sectors such as Tannery Industries, 



Beg et al., American International Journal of Multidisciplinary Scientific Research 15(2) (2024), 1-11

  

4 

 

Pharmaceuticals, Fuel & Power, Mutual Funds, Miscellaneous, and Banking offered significant corporate benefits to 

investors. However, the dividend performance of ten sectors fell short of the overall market performance. 

Furthermore, the performance of listed securities in terms of earnings per share (EPS) percentage exhibited strength 

over the five years, with Tannery Industries leading the pack, followed by Miscellaneous, Food & Allied, Pharmaceuticals, 

Fuel & Power, and Cement sectors. Remarkably, nine sectors outperformed the overall market performance in terms of EPS. 

The growth trajectory of the DSE General Index displayed volatility, with varying percentages of (7.35), 62.25, 

82.79, and (36.58) for the years 2008, 2009, 2010, and 2011, respectively. Despite fluctuations, EPS growth remained 

positive, indicating consistent income growth. However, the comparison between the price-earnings ratio and EPS 

showcased inconsistencies over the years. Dividend growth percentages were also notable, with a positive growth trend. 

 

2012 

The year 2012 witnessed market fluctuations, reflective of investors' wavering confidence. The Benchmark DSE General 

Index (DGEN) recorded a negative change, starting at 5351.75 and ending at 4219.31, marking a decline of 1132.44 points. 

Tannery Industries emerged as the top performer in 2012, followed by Telecommunication, Miscellaneous, Food & Allied, 

Fuel & Power, Cement, and Pharmaceuticals sectors. 

Despite the market volatility, EPS growth remained positive. However, the comparison between the price-earnings 

ratio and EPS did not exhibit consistent trends. Dividend growth percentages depicted a highly positive relation between 

earnings and corporate benefits. This discrepancy between earnings and prices contributed to the market turmoil witnessed 

in 2011 and 2012. 

 

2013 

The introduction of two new indices by the DSE, namely the DSE Broad Index ("DSEX") and DSE 30 Index ("DS30"), 

based on free float and S & P methodology, marked a significant development in January 2013. The DSEX serves as the 

Broad Index, reflecting approximately 97% of the total market capitalization, while the DS30 comprises 30 leading 

companies, representing around 51% of the total market capitalization. These indices are constructed based on free float and 

S & P methodology, enhancing market transparency and providing investors with comprehensive benchmarks for 

performance evaluation. 

 

2014 

In 2014, the Bangladesh capital market rebounded from the downturn of 2010, showcasing stability throughout the year. 

Market trends predominantly inclined upwards, with significant increases observed in the index, trade volume, and market 

capitalization compared to 2013. Notably, IPOs and rights issues contributed to capital formation, while foreign trade 

reached new milestones, reflecting growing investor confidence. 

Additionally, regulatory measures implemented by the Bangladesh Securities and Exchange Commission (BSEC), 

including a policy to expedite the IPO timeframe, facilitated quicker refund processes and company enlistments, fostering 

market efficiency. 

 

2015 

In the fiscal year 2014-15, the Dhaka Stock Exchange (DSE) witnessed significant growth in both its index and market 

capital compared to the previous fiscal year. Despite a slight decrease in trade volume, industrial entrepreneurs raised Tk. 

12,469 million through Initial Public Offerings (IPOs) and Tk. 14,458 million through rights issues. Additionally, 130 

companies increased their capital by Tk. 26,638.80 million through bonus share issuances. Foreign trade also increased, 

totaling Tk. 69,912 million, with Tk. 41,450 million in securities bought and Tk. 28,457 million sold. Despite the trade 

decrease, Dhaka Stock Exchange Limited contributed Tk. 1,124 million to the Government fund, collected from brokerage 

houses as tax per income tax ordinance 1984 section 53 B88, and Tk. 609 million from the sale of sponsor and placement 

securities per income tax ordinance 1984 section 53M. 

 

2016 

In 2016, the performance of listed securities, measured by earnings per share (in %), showed improvement compared to 

2015. Telecommunication Industries emerged as the top performer, followed by Food & Allied, Pharmaceuticals, Tannery, 

Fuel & Power, and Cement sectors. However, thirteen sectors exhibited earnings per share performance below the overall 

market in 2016. 

By the end of December 2016, the market closed at 5,036.05 points, marking an increase of 8.78% from the 

previous year. Earnings per share (in %) grew by (23.07), (3.14), 2.59, and 10.51 in 2013, 2014, 2015, and 2016 respectively. 

The comparison between price-earnings ratio and EPS revealed varying trends over the years, with an inverse relationship 

observed in 2014 and 2015 but a positive correlation in 2016. 

Corporate benefit growth percentages were (19.30), (4.14), (1.46), and (21.68) in 2013, 2014, 2015, and 2016 

respectively, indicating a positive relationship between earnings and corporate benefits except for 2013 and 2016. 

 

2017 

In 2017, the total trade volume of Dhaka Stock Exchange Limited reached Tk. 2,169,597.12 million, marking an 82.08% 

increase or Tk. 978,025.85 million higher than the previous year, the highest recorded trade volume since 2010. Over 248 



Beg et al., American International Journal of Multidisciplinary Scientific Research 15(2) (2024), 1-11

  

5 

 

working days, the average daily trade amounted to Tk. 8,748.38 million, compared to Tk. 4,944.28 million over 241 working 

days in 2016. 

The DSE Broad Index (DSEX) surged by 1,208.47 points or 24% to reach 6,244.52 points in 2017. The highest 

and lowest points recorded were 6,336.88 and 5,083.89, respectively. Since its inception on January 28, 2013, with a starting 

point of 4,090.47, this closing index marked the highest level achieved after its launch. 

 

2018 

In 2018, the Bangladesh capital market witnessed a historic transformation with the inclusion of strategic investors. The 

consortium of the world's leading stock exchanges, Shenzhen Stock Exchange and Shanghai Stock Exchange, acquired a 

25% ownership stake in the Dhaka Stock Exchange, approved by the Government of Bangladesh and the Bangladesh 

Securities and Exchange Commission. This partnership is poised to bring significant benefits, including capital formation, 

SME market development, product diversification, information disclosure, investor relationship services, human resources 

development, and technological advancements, contributing to high-quality growth in both the capital market and the 

economy. 

However, despite this landmark development, the total trade volume of the Dhaka Stock Exchange in 2018 

decreased by 38.43%, amounting to Tk. 133,591.33 crore, compared to Tk. 216,959.71 crore in 2017. The number of 

working days in 2018 was 242, with an average turnover of Tk. 552.03 crore, whereas in 2017, the total trade turnover was 

Tk. 216,959.71 crore, with 248 working days and an average trade of Tk. 874.83 crore. 

 

2019 

In 2019, listed securities had a slight decrease in average dividend payments compared to 2018. The Telecommunication 

sector led in distributing corporate benefits, followed by Pharmaceuticals, Tannery, and others. Earnings per share showed 

positive growth, with the Jute sector leading. However, eighteen sectors fell below the overall market in earnings. The DSE 

Broad Index closed at 4452.93 points, down 17.32% from the previous year. Earnings per share growth ranged from 0.62% 

to 10.51%, while corporate benefit growth fluctuated, ranging from (21.68) % to 2.41%. 

 

Capital Market Statistics: Securities Turnover 

The term 'turnover' denotes the aggregate value of securities exchanged during a defined timeframe, typically assessed daily, 

monthly, or annually. It encapsulates the total quantity of shares transacted within a specific market or exchange over a 

given period. 

Stock exchange turnover serves as a vital gauge of trading activity and market liquidity. It is computed by 

multiplying the number of shares or securities traded by their respective prices during the specified duration. The turnover 

formula is commonly represented as: 

 

Turnover = Number of Shares Traded × Price per Share 

The securities turnover of the Dhaka Stock Exchange (DSE) from 2010 to 2019 is delineated below: 

 

Table 1. Securities Turnover 2010-2019 

 
Year Trading Days No. of Shares and Debentures in 

Mn 

Amount Tk. in 

Mn 

Changes in Share 

Volume 

Changes in 

Share Value 

2010 244 16,974.52 4,009,912.67 - - 

2011 235 16,967.15 1,560,912.09 -0.04% -61.07% 

2012 238 21,688.68 1,001,084.90 27.83% -35.87% 

2013 238 22,988.53 952,742.80 5.99% -4.83% 

2014 238 25,996.17 1,188,521.54 13.08% 24.75% 

2015 244 26,106.07 1,031,398.64 0.42% -13.22% 

2016 241 34,912.00 1,191,571.27 33.73% 15.53% 

2017 248 65,605.00 2,169,597.12 87.92% 82.08% 

2018 242 33,563.00 1,333,683.19 -48.84% -38.53% 

2019 237 32,759.00 1,138,402.81 -2.40% -14.64% 

 



Beg et al., American International Journal of Multidisciplinary Scientific Research 15(2) (2024), 1-11

  

6 

 

In 2010, trading occurred on 244 days, with 16,974.52 million shares & debentures valued at Tk. 4,009,912.67 million 

traded. In 2011, trading occurred on 235 days, with 

16,967.15 million shares & debentures worth Tk. 

1,560,912.09 million traded.  

In 2012, trading occurred on 238 days, with 21,688.68 

million shares & debentures valued at Tk. 1,001,084.90 

million traded. In 2013, trading occurred on 238 days, 

with 22,988.53 million shares & debentures worth Tk. 

952,742.08 million traded.  

In 2014, trading occurred on 238 days, with 25,996.17 

million shares & debentures valued at Tk. 1,188,521.54 

million traded.  

In 2015, trading occurred on 244 days, with 26,106.07 

million securities worth Tk. 1,031,398.64 million 

traded. 

 

Compared to 2015, total traded volume and value 

increased by 33.73% and 15.53% in 2016. The 

highest daily traded value was Tk. 9,358 million in 

December 2016.  

In 2017, total traded volume and value increased by 

87.13% and 82.08% respectively. However, in 

2018, total traded volume and value decreased by 

48.84% and 38.53% respectively.  

In 2019, trading occurred on 237 days, with a total 

traded volume and value decreasing by 48.84% and 

38.53% respectively compared to 2018. The highest 

traded value in 2019 was Tk. 1,138,402.81 million, 

with a total of 32,759.00 shares traded. 

 

 

Overall, the highest traded volume was 65,605.00 securities in 2017, and the lowest was 21,688.68 securities in 

2012. Similarly, the highest trading value was Tk. 4,009,912.67 million in 2010, and the lowest was Tk. 952,742.80 million 

in 2013. 

 

Sector-Wise Turnover Performance 
Sector-wise turnover denotes the evaluation of trading activity within distinct sectors or industries of the stock market over 

a specific period. It entails assessing the total value of shares traded within various sectors, offering insights into the relative 

trading volumes and investor interest across different segments of the economy.  

 

Table 2. The sectorial turnover of DSE from 2010 to 2019  

 
Sector 2010 2011 2012 

Total Turnover in Million Total Turnover in Million Total Turnover in Million 

Volume Value Volume Value Volume Value 

Financial Sector 

Banks 4753.29 1147621.32 4915.13 391144.6 5268.47 156,870.04 

Financial Institutions 1132.54 607695.22 629.24 176118.8 1490.43 81,367.75 

Insurance 435.36 326724.36 608.76 128689.3 1014.03 63,355.03 

Mutual Fund 3182.91 76363.17 3854.69 54512.46 2478.87 33,053.76 

Total 9,504.10 2,158,404.07 10,007.82 750,465.16 10,251.80 334,646.58 

Manufacturing Sector 

Engineering 834.67 275034.1 681.62 128873.1 1122.67 86,081.48 

Foods 505.26 70472.32 467.13 36061.56 442.05 20,897.44 

Jute 0.29 481.75 1.16 791.75 4.07 528.62 

Textile 2201.76 241269.15 2140.9 150558 2643.76 95,735.62 

Pharmaceuticals 906.14 204959.66 746.67 99894.12 1368.19 75,557.80 

Paper & Printing 7.83 512.89 3.79 184.76 2.2 63.46 

Cement 159.52 108350.82 259.81 57967.35 656.72 44,395.69 

Tannery 41.72 32961.17 19.66 9099.79 40.92 3,866.77 

Ceramics 482.57 60955.36 341.43 37,881.89 387.79 16,153.13 

Total 5,139.76 994,997.22 4,662.17 521,312.32 6,668.37 343,280.01 

Miscellaneous & Service 

Fuel And Power 882.9 461298.63 622.02 124040.8 1 ,561.07 149,640.43 

Service & Real Estate 132.78 69290.26 75.36 15813.84 139.64 8,234.70 

 -

 500,000

 1,000,000

 1,500,000

 2,000,000

 2,500,000

 3,000,000

 3,500,000

 4,000,000

 4,500,000

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Figure1. Securities Turnover 2010-2019

 -

 10,000

 20,000

 30,000

 40,000

 50,000

 60,000

 70,000

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Figure 2. No. of Shares and Debentures in Million



Beg et al., American International Journal of Multidisciplinary Scientific Research 15(2) (2024), 1-11

  

7 

 

IT 288.8 17006.55 242.23 8815.9 423.77 14,840.45 

Telecommunication 299 83932.47 192.31 34171.24 362.39 53,658.17 

Travel And Leisure 53.73 25917.22 750.95 34848.64 1 ,831.26 57,534.05 

Miscellaneous 680.63 213787.83 413.2 69930.34 448.54 38,677.46 

Total 2,337.84 871,232.96 2,296.07 287,620.76 1,374.34 322,585.26 

Bond 

Corporate Bond 1.3 1,144.17 1.07 967.17 0.58 546.02 

 
Sector 2013 2014 2015 

Total Turnover in Million Total Turnover in Million Total Turnover in Million 

Volume Value Volume Value Volume Value 

Financial Sector 

Banks 4,018.09 79,471.06 5,662.01 109,009.36 4,480.66 80,152.24 

Financial Institutions 1,420.04 47,196.72 1 981.16 62,916.03 1,777.41 42,762.14 

Insurance 830.05 51,420.11 802.63 51,507.39 479.14 19,461.25 

Mutual Fund 3,259.00 38,946.17 1,994.43 19,933.59 1,839.71 13,474.96 

Total 9,527.18 165,613.95 6,464.64 191,858.98 6,737.21 155,850.59 

Manufacturing Sector 

Engineering 1,200.29 82,552.98 2.528.94 146,283.84 2,956.80 159,312.98 

Foods 755.64 41,824.65 951.97 66,521.16 789.22 46,301.67 

Jute 6.75 861.88 6.32 864.19 10.14 1,498.73 

Textile 4,475.23 152,081.59 3,478.77 111,995.85 4,151.42 100,418.01 

Pharmaceuticals 1,462.34 96,549.57 2, 192.92 160,217.60 2,017.23 164,522.46 

Paper & Printing 4.5 137.07 224.68 7,170.13 170.16 3,861.87 

Cement 438.81 38,727.39 694.53 71,573.31 387.55 43,773.07 

Tannery 69.86 9,529.09 79.06 15,424.32 100 9,754.88 

Ceramics 259.38 7,150.21 293.93 9,898.63 337.64 15,299.85 

Total 6,010.17 305,036.80 5,729.26 443,665.19 7,963.36 385,430.54 

Miscellaneous & Service 

Fuel And Power 1,654.38 141,434.57 1,941.11 176,957.69 2,135.21 170,375.57 

Service & Real Estate 165.61 7,337.66 369.02 21,421.90 545.57 36,177.20 

IT 516.32 14,936.43 517.85 15,602.97 563.25 16,277.07 

Telecommunication 281.05 57,740.06 258.92 64,768.24 168.78 36,778.09 

Travel And Leisure 1,698.95 53,170.14 1,032.18 22,541.87 1,758.36 23,147.43 

Miscellaneous 453.15 30,287.54 985.46 53,743.99 1,407.60 47,826.38 

Total 3,115.08 163,471.83 3,163.43 178,078.97 4,443.56 160,206.17 

Bond 

Corporate Bond 0.29 274.12 0.17 166.58 0.23 214.13 

 
Sector 2016 2017 2018 2019 

Total Turnover in Million Total Turnover in Million Total Turnover in Million Total Turnover in Million 

Volume Value Volume Value Volume Value Volume Value 

Financial Sector 

Banks 6109.67 105644.15 20726.49 491991.58 6086.76 137255.61 6178.92 123564.35 

Financial Institutions 3030.58 76075.13 6316.74 225540.57 2306.2 60150.72 2423.11 48312.62 

Insurance 1041.74 27399.22 1,313.53 39320.61 1119.64 45381.06 4485.79 139291.59 

Mutual Fund 1809.91 11504.2 4643.75 37878.68 1316.17 10578.09 2818.83 22493.16 

Total 11991.9 220622.7 31686.98 794731.44 10828.77 253365.48 15906.65 333661.72 

Manufacturing Sector 

Engineering 3874.09 199794.73 4799.7 275803.38 3446.56 206399.61 2471.27 148634.88 

Foods 991.68 65645.54 1,566.20 69849.69 1,227.96 58223.33 663.87 45342.61 

Jute 15.04 2830.69 15.17 5276.44 20.22 7431.6 8.85 5587.65 

Textile 6753.15 130293.78 11689.61 257684.51 8014.42 218177.91 5666.68 128911.1 

Pharmaceuticals 3140.83 165846.97 4831.6 237790.25 2957.5 164115.19 2398.19 134973.8 

Paper & Printing 80.43 2334.23 119.35 4053.92 169.21 13002.82 98.06 5170.57 

Cement 509.27 44848.37 519.4 49021.31 253.03 23342.74 197.37 12218.75 

Tannery 206.5 15617.01 405.08 26873.26 490.03 29425.76 816.6 40588.43 

Ceramics 546.78 14593 653.01 25826.42 375.77 27942.76 258.43 33851.29 

Total 16117.77 641804.32 24599.12 952179.18 16954.7 748061.72 12579.32 555279.08 

Miscellaneous & Service 

Fuel And Power 2117.27 167273.49 2517.57 186526.05 1749.34 147597.62 1239.06 109402.09 

Service & Real Estate 510.68 25435.19 768.16 37915.62 301.14 10289.43 261.79 9450.47 

IT 931.49 27924.21 1393.43 49531.36 948.87 37279.29 723.48 29662.1 

Telecommunication 130.6 22323.17 122.48 34564.51 92.56 31994.2 199.08 39353.38 

Travel And Leisure 1267.59 16641.14 879.49 21509.37 703.16 21482.48 469.36 7933.74 

Miscellaneous 1781.54 66738.28 2323.2 91816.93 1981 .65 83462.28 1379.77 53595.15 

Total 6739.17 326335.48 8004.33 421863.84 3795.07 332105.3 4272.54 249396.93 

Bond 

Corporate Bond 0.13 126.69 822.66 822.66 0.11 105.67 0.07 65.07 

 

In 2010, the financial sector led the DSE turnover, representing 63.36% of the total turnover, with bank stocks at 

the forefront. Manufacturing followed, contributing 22.16%, led by the textile industry, while fuel and power accounted for 

7.00%. This trend continued in 2011, with the financial sector dominating at 48.07%, manufacturing at 33.40%, and fuel 



Beg et al., American International Journal of Multidisciplinary Scientific Research 15(2) (2024), 1-11

  

8 

 

and power at 7.95%. In 2012, manufacturing took the lead with 34.29%, driven by engineering stocks, followed closely by 

the financial sector at 33.43%. Fuel and power also showed growth at 14.95%. This trend persisted in 2013 and 2014, with 

manufacturing dominating and fuel and power showing significant contributions. By 2015, manufacturing still led with 

52.82%, followed by financials at 15.11%. This trend continued in 2016 and 2017, with slight variations in sectoral 

contributions. In 2018, manufacturing maintained its dominance at 56.09%, with miscellaneous and service sectors also 

contributing significantly. The trend persisted in 2019, with engineering leading at 13.06% and pharmaceuticals following 

closely at 11.86%, and textile sector making notable contributions. 

 

DISCUSSIONS 

Brokerage houses are integral players in the capital market ecosystem, facilitating the buying and selling of securities. Over 

the past decade, their impact on community development in Bangladesh has been notable. In 2017, total traded volume 

reached Tk. 2,169,597.12 million, marking an 82.08% increase from the previous year, indicating a broader engagement in 

the capital market, facilitated by brokerage houses. Sector-wise turnover data revealed consistent investment trends, with 

sectors such as manufacturing, financials, and pharmaceuticals attracting significant investments over the years. For 

example, in 2018, manufacturing maintained its dominance with a turnover share of 56.09%, reflecting investor confidence 

nurtured by brokerage houses' educational initiatives. Investments directed towards key sectors, such as manufacturing and 

financial services, drove economic growth and development. These investments led to tangible outcomes like job creation 

and infrastructure development. The surge in trading activity in 2017, with a peak trading volume of 65,605.00 securities, 

correlates with increased economic activity and opportunities for communities. Capital inflows facilitated by brokerage 

houses translated into job opportunities across industries. The peak trading volume in 2017 signifies heightened economic 

activity, contributing to job creation and socioeconomic advancement. This highlights the role of brokerage houses in 

fostering employment and supporting community livelihoods. Investments in infrastructure sectors contributed to 

community development, as reflected in the surge in trading activity and capital formation. For instance, increased 

investments in critical infrastructure like transportation and energy enhance connectivity and improve quality of life for 

communities. Brokerage houses leverage technology to enhance market efficiency and accessibility, fostering broader 

participation in the capital market. The adoption of online trading platforms has enabled remote access to markets, driving 

technological advancement and financial inclusion. Brokerage houses contribute to social welfare through CSR activities, 

investing in community development projects, education, healthcare, and environmental sustainability. These initiatives 

contribute to improving the well-being of communities and fostering inclusive growth. In summary, brokerage houses 

contribute significantly to community development by facilitating investment activities, promoting economic growth, 

fostering financial inclusion, and engaging in corporate social responsibility initiatives. Their role as intermediaries in the 

capital market is crucial for the holistic development of society. 

 

CONCLUSIONS  

In conclusion, this study has illuminated the vital role of stock brokerage houses in Bangladesh's capital market and their 

potential impact on community development. Through an exploration of historical milestones, market dynamics, and 

regulatory oversight, we have uncovered key insights into the challenges and opportunities facing brokerage firms in 

fostering inclusive growth and economic prosperity. Our findings underscore the importance of understanding the specific 

contributions of brokerage houses to community development within the broader context of Bangladesh's capital market. 

By filling a notable gap in existing literature, this study provides valuable insights for policymakers, practitioners, and 

stakeholders in the financial sector. The implications of this research are far-reaching. Recognizing the potential of 

brokerage houses to drive community development can inform strategic initiatives aimed at promoting market inclusivity, 

integrity, and resilience. Moreover, addressing the limitations identified in this study, such as the absence of derivative 

instruments and challenges related to market manipulation, can guide future research and policy interventions. Looking 

ahead, there are exciting opportunities for further exploration. Future research could delve deeper into specific strategies for 

enhancing the role of brokerage houses in community development and explore the impact of regulatory reforms and market 

innovations on market efficiency and inclusivity. In this study, we recognize certain limitations that deserve 

acknowledgment. Firstly, our expertise in the capital market of Bangladesh is limited, which may affect the depth of analysis 

and interpretation. Secondly, the study's focus on the period from 2010 to 2019 might lead to oversight of historical trends 

and events crucial for contextual understanding. Lastly, the dynamic regulatory environment and macroeconomic influences 

could potentially impact the relevance and generalizability of our findings. Despite these limitations, our study offers 

valuable insights into the role of stock brokerage houses in community development, laying a foundation for future research 

and policy interventions aimed at fostering inclusive growth and economic prosperity. In essence, this study contributes to 

a deeper understanding of the intricate dynamics between stock brokerage houses and community development within 

Bangladesh's capital market. By recognizing the pivotal role brokerage firms play in shaping market outcomes and fostering 

socio-economic progress, we can pave the way for a more equitable and prosperous future for all stakeholders involved. 

 

 
Author Contributions: Conceptualization, T.H.B., T.A., M.H., A.H. and R.H.; Methodology, T.H.B.; Software, T.H.B.; Validation, T.H.B.; Formal 

Analysis, T.H.B., T.A., M.H., A.H. and R.H.; Investigation, T.H.B.; Resources, T.H.B.; Data Curation, T.H.B.; Writing – Original Draft Preparation, 

T.H.B., T.A., M.H., A.H. and R.H.; Writing – Review & Editing, T.H.B., T.A., M.H., A.H. and R.H.; Visualization, T.H.B.; Supervision, T.H.B.; Project 
Administration, T.H.B.; Funding Acquisition, T.H.B., T.A., M.H., A.H. and R.H. Authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. 

Institutional Review Board Statement: Ethical review and approval were waived for this study because the research does not involve vulnerable groups 



Beg et al., American International Journal of Multidisciplinary Scientific Research 15(2) (2024), 1-11

  

9 

 

or sensitive issues. 

Funding: The authors received no direct funding for this research. 

Acknowledgements: Not applicable.  

Informed Consent Statement: Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study. 
Data Availability Statement: The data presented in this study are available upon request from the corresponding author. Due to restrictions, they are not 

publicly available. 

Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   

 

REFERENCES 

Al-Imran, M., Chowdhury, M. S., Arafin, S., Hridoy, M. Z., & Rahman, M. M. (2023). The Impact of Material's Price Hike 

on Theproduction Cost: A Case Study of Summit Communications Ltd. American International Journal of 

Multidisciplinary Scientific Research, 4(3), 1-10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.46281/aijmsr.v14i3.2063 

Al-Imran, M., Chowdhury, M. S., Ayanle, A. D., & Masum, A. A. (2022). Assessment of Micro Insurance as an Emerging 

Microfinance for the Poor: A Study on Somalia. American International Journal of Business and Management 

Studies, 4(1), 12-21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.46545/aijbms.v4i1.280 

Al-Imran, M., Hossain , M. S., Mridha, M. M., & Islam, M. A. (2023). Social Media as a Tool for Brand Promotion: A 

Content Analysis of Three Fashion Brands' Facebook Page. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 48(1), 

28-36. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2023/v48i11036%20 

Ayanle, A. D., Chowdhury, M. S., Al- Imran, M., & Rahman, S. (2022). The Role of Microcredit and Micro Savings for 

Raising Microfinance Sustainability in Somali. Bangladesh Journal of Multidisciplinary Scientific Research, 6(1), 

30-39. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.46281/bjmsr.v6i1.1925 

Ali, M. C., Islam, K. M. A., Chung, S. J., Zayed, N. M., & Afrin, M. (2020). A Study of Green Human Resources 

Management (GHRM) and Green Creativity for Human Resources Professionals. International Journal of 

Business and Management Future, 4(2), 57-67. https://doi.org/10.46281/ijbmf.v4i2.857 

Ali, M. C., Islam, K. M. A., Chung, S. J., Zayed, N. M., & Islam, M. R. (2021). The correlation between job-hopping 

attitude and turnover behavior: A job satisfaction perspective in Bangladesh. International Journal of Business 

and Management Future, 5(1), 14-26. 

Ahmed, S. F., Zayed, N. M., Islam, K. M. A., & Nitsenko, V. (2022). Investigating the impact of re consumption on co2 

emissions: evidence from the saarc countries. Natsional'nyi Hirnychyi Universytet. Naukovyi Visnyk, 3, 107-111. 

https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2022-3/107 

Al-Quraan, T. M., Vovk, O., Halko, S., Kvitka, S., Suprun, O., Miroshnyk, O., ... & Islam, K. A. (2022). Energy-Saving 

Load Control of Induction Electric Motors for Drives of Working Machines to Reduce Thermal Wear. Inventions, 

7(4), 92. https://doi.org/10.3390/inventions7040092 

Bazaluk, O., Kader, S. A., Zayed, N. M., Chowdhury, R., Islam, M. Z., Nitsenko, V. S., & Bratus , H. (2024, April 24 ). 

Determinant on Economic Growth in Developing Country: A Special Case Regarding Turkey and Bangladesh. 

Journal of the Knowledge Economy. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-01989-8 

Bazaluk, O., Rahman, M. A., Zayed, N. M., Alam, M. F.-E., Nitsenko, V., & Kucher , L. (2024, February 07). 

Crowdsourcing review: the crowd workers’ perspective. Journal of Industrial and Business Economics. 

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s40812-023-00295-9 

Benjamin, L., Rubin, J., & Zielenbach, S. (2004). Community Development Financial Institutions: Current Issues and 

Future Prospects. Journal of Urban Affairs, 26(2), 177-195. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0735-

2166.2004.00196.x 

Bhuiyan, K. H., Jahan, I., Zayed, N. M., Islam, K. M. A., Suyaiya, S., Tkachenko, O., & Nitsenko, V. (2022). Smart 

Tourism Ecosystem: A New Dimension toward Sustainable Value Co-Creation. Sustainability, 14(22), 15043. 

https://doi.org/10.3390/su142215043 

Chowdhury, M. S., Al-Imran, M., Faisal-E-Alam, M., Hoque, M. E., & Parvin, T. (2022). Investigating the Financial 

Strength in the Energy Sector: A Study on TGTDCL. American International Journal of Humanities, Arts and 

Social Sciences, 4, 15-24. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.46545/aijhass.v4i1.285 

Chowdhury, S., Islam, K. M. A., Rahman, M. M., Raisa, T. S., & Zayed, N. M. (2020). One Day International (ODI) 

Cricket Match Prediction in Logistic Analysis: India VS. Pakistan. Journal of Human Movement and Sports 

Sciences, 8(6), 543-548. https://doi.org/10.13189/saj.2020.080629 

Chowdhury, F. N., Mustafa, J., Islam, K. M. A., Hasan, K. B. M. R., Zayed, N. M., & Raisa, T. S. (2021a). Social Business 

in an Emerging Economy: An Empirical Study in Bangladesh. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and 

Business, 8(3), 931–941. https://doi.org/10.13106/JAFEB.2021.VOL8.NO3.0931 

Chowdhury, S., Meero, A., Rahman, A.A.A., Islam, K. M. A., & Zayed, N. M., Hasan, K.B.M. R.  (2021b). AN 

EMPIRICAL STUDY ON THE FACTORS AFFECTING ORGANIC FOOD PURCHASING BEHAVIOR IN 

BANGLADESH: ANALYZING A FEW FACTORS. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 20(4), 1-12. 

Retrieved from https://www.abacademies.org/articles/An-empirical-study-on-the-factors-affecting- 

Edeh, F. O., Zayed, N. M., Darwish, S., Nitsenko, V., Hanechko, I., & Islam, K. M. A. (2023). Impression Management 

and Employee Contextual Performance in Service Organizations (Enterprises) Emerging Science Journal, 7(2), 

366-384. http://dx.doi.org/10.28991/ESJ-2023-07-02-05 

Faisal-E-Alam, M., Meero, A., Rahman, A. A. A., Zayed, N. M., Islam, K. M. A., & Imran, M. A. (2022). Social Media 

and Tourists’ Decision in Bangladesh: An Empirical Study on Travelling Cox’s Bazar. Journal of Environmental 

Management and Tourism, 13(4), 925-934. Retrieved from 

https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2022-3/107
https://www.abacademies.org/articles/An-empirical-study-on-the-factors-affecting-


Beg et al., American International Journal of Multidisciplinary Scientific Research 15(2) (2024), 1-11

  

10 

 

https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jemt/article/view/7050organic-food-purchasing-behavior-in-bangladesh-

analyzing-a-few-factors-1939-6104-20-4-815.pdf 

Groth, J., Lewellen, W., Schlarbaum , G., & Lease, R. (1979). An Analysis of Brokerage House Securities 

Recommendations. Financial Analysts Journal, 35(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v35.n1.32 

Iqbal, M. M., Islam, K. M. A., Zayed, N. M., Beg, T. H., & Shahi, S. K. (2021). IMPACT OF ARTIFICIAL 

INTELLIGENCE AND DIGITAL ECONOMY ON INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION 4: EVIDENCE FROM 

BANGLADESH. American Finance & Banking Review, 6(1), 42-55. https://doi.org/10.46281/amfbr.v6i1.1489  

Kader, S. A., Zayed, N. M., Khan, S., Islam, K. M. A., & Siddiki, M. N. A. (2019). An Analysis of Socio-Economic 

Condition of Female Readymade Garments’(RMG) Workers in Dhaka City. The Millennium University Journal, 

4(1), 12-20. Retrieved from http://www.themillenniumuniversity.edu.bd/journal/index.php/TMUJ/article/view/26 

Kader, S. A., Rahman, A. A. A., Meero, A., Islam, K. M. A., Zayed, N. M., Hasan, K. B. M. R. (2021a). COVID-19: 

AFTER EFFECTS OF CORONAVIRUS AND ITS IMPACT ON GLOBAL ECONOMY. Academy of Strategic 

Management Journal, 20(1). 1-9 Retrieved from https://www.abacademies.org/articles/covid19-after-effects-of-

coronavirus-and-its-impact-on-global-economy-11472.html 

Kader, S. A., Kulsum, U., Islam, K. M. A., Siddiki, M. N. A., Zayed, N. M., & Raisa, T. S. (2021b). Present Situation of 

the Field Workers in the Development Sector: A Social, Financial and Employment Aspect in Bangladesh. Journal 

of Southwest Jiaotong University, 56(2). https://doi.org/10.35741/issn.0258-2724.56.2.29 

Kabir, M. R., Khan, S., Chowdhury, S., Jahan, S., Islam, K. A., & Zayed, N. M. (2021). Corruption Possibilities in the 

Climate Financing Sector and Role of the Civil Societies in Bangladesh. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 

56(2). https://doi.org/10.35741/issn.0258-2724.56.2.6 

Khan, S., Zayed, N. M., Darwish, S., Nitsenko, V., Islam, K. M. A., Hassan, M. A., & Dubrova, O. (2023). Pre and Present 

COVID-19 Situation: A Framework of Educational Transformation in South Asia Region. Emerging Science 

Journal, 7, 81-94. https://doi.org/10.28991/ESJ-2023-SPER-06 

Haini, H. (2019, December 09 ). Examining the relationship between finance, institutions and economic growth: evidence 

from the ASEAN economies. 53, 519–542. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-019-09257-5 

Hasan, Z. A. (2023, November 16). Empowering Investments: The rise of smart brokerage ecosystems. The Business 

Standard. Retrieved from https://www.tbsnews.net/economy/corporates/empowering-investments-rise-smart-

brokerage-ecosystems-740498 

Mia, M. M., Shamsudin, M. F., Zayed, N. M., Mirzoieva, T. V., Shtuler, I. Y., & Bogma, O. S. (2023). Crowdsourcing for 

business strategy and sustainability: a partial least square structural equation model. Naukovyi Visnyk 

Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2023-3/184 

Mohamed, I. S., Chowdhury, M. S., Al- Imran, M., Ali Imran, M., & Mimi, A. (2022). The Components Impacting 

Customer's Bank Determination Choice In Mogadishu, Somalia. Asian Finance & Banking Review, 6(1), 25-32. 

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.46281/asfbr.v6i1.1890 

Mridha, M. M., Hossain, M. S., Chowdhury, M. S., Imran, M. A., & Debnath, D. (2023). Factors influencing consumers’ 

attitude towards online shopping in Rangpur City. International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 13, 16-26. 

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.25081/imrj.2023.v13.8324 

Mia, M. M., Zayed, N. M., Islam, K. M. A., Nitsenko, V., Matusevych, T., & Mordous, I. (2022). The Strategy of Factors 

Influencing Learning Satisfaction Explored by First and Second-Order Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). 

Inventions, 7(3), 59. https://doi.org/10.3390/inventions7030059 

Nayeen, C. J., Islam, K. M. A., Chowdhury, F. N., & Zayed, N. M. (2020). Testing Communicative Language Teaching 

(CLT) through English for Today (EFT) in Bangladesh: Challenges Faced by Tertiary Students Initially. American 

International Journal of Education and Linguistics Research, 3(2), 19-27. 

Nahar, S., Meero, A., Rahman, A. A. A., Hasan, K. B. M. R., Islam, K. M. A., Zayed, N. M., Faisal-E-Alam, M. (2021). 

ANALYSIS ON THE MARKETING STRATEGY AND COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE OF BANKING 

INDUSTRY IN BANGLADESH: AN ENTREPRENEURIAL CASE STUDY OF HSBC BANK. Academy of 

Entrepreneurship Journal, 27(4). 1-7. Retrieved from https://www.abacademies.org/articles/Analysis-on-the-

marketing-strategy-and-competitive-advantage-of-banking-industry-1528-2686-27-4-552.pdf 

Rahman, A. A. A., Meero, A., Zayed, N. M., Islam, K. M. A., Rabban, M. R., Bunagan, V. D. R. (2021a). IMPACT OF 

LEVERAGE RATIOS ON INDICATORS OF FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE: EVIDENCE FROM BAHRAIN. 

Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 20(3). Retrieved from https://www.abacademies.org/articles/impact-

of-leverage-ratios-on-indicators-of-financial-performance--evidence-from-bahrain-11166.html 

Rahman, A. A. A., Darwish, S., Meero, A., Zayed, N. M., Islam, K. M. A., Raisa, T. S. (2021b). EMERGING 

STRATEGIES AND ECONOMIC IMPACT OF COVID-19: A CASE STUDY OF GULF COOPERATION 

COUNCIL COUNTRIES (GCC). Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 20(1). 1-10 Retrieved from 

https://www.abacademies.org/articles/emerging-strategies-and-economic-impact-of-covid19-a-case-study-of-

gulf-cooperation-council-countries-gcc-11270.html 

Rubi, M. A., Chowdhury, S., Rahman, A. A. A., Meero, A., Zayed, N. M., & Islam, K. M. A. (2022). Fitting Multi-Layer 

Feed Forward Neural Network and Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average for Dhaka Stock Exchange Price 

Predicting. Emerging Science Journal, 6(5), 1046-1061. https://doi.org/10.28991/ESJ-2022-06-05-09 

Rubi, M. A., Chowdhury, S., Rahman, A. A., Meero, A., Zayed, N. M., & Islam , K. M. (2022, October 5). Fitting Multi-

Layer Feed Forward Neural Network and Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average for Dhaka Stock Exchange 

https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jemt/article/view/7050
https://doi.org/10.3390/inventions7030059
https://www.abacademies.org/articles/Analysis-on-the-marketing-strategy-and-competitive-advantage-of-banking-industry-1528-2686-27-4-552.pdf
https://www.abacademies.org/articles/Analysis-on-the-marketing-strategy-and-competitive-advantage-of-banking-industry-1528-2686-27-4-552.pdf
https://doi.org/10.28991/ESJ-2022-06-05-09


Beg et al., American International Journal of Multidisciplinary Scientific Research 15(2) (2024), 1-11

  

11 

 

Price Predicting. Emerging Science Journal (ESJ). Retrieved from 

https://www.ijournalse.org/index.php/ESJ/article/view/998/pdf 

Shamsa Kanwal, Muhammad Imran Rasheed, Abdul Hameed Pitafi, Adnan Pitafi , & Minglun Ren. (2020,, April ). Road 

and transport infrastructure development and community support for tourism: The role of perceived benefits, and 

community satisfaction. Tourism Management. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2019.104014 

Shaw, M. (2008). Community development and the politics of community. Community Development Journal, Volume 

43(1), 24–36. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsl035 

Shahriar, M. S., Islam, K. M. A., Zayed, N. M., Hasan, K. B. M. R., & Raisa, T. S. (2021a). The Impact of COVID-19 on 

Bangladesh’s Economy: A Focus on Graduate Employability. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and 

Business, 8(3), 1395–1403. https://doi.org/10.13106/JAFEB.2021.VOL8.NO3.1395 

Shahriar, M.S., Hasan, K.B.M.R., Hossain, T., Beg, T.H., Islam, K.M.A., & Zayed, N.M.  (2021b). Financial decision 

making and forecasting techniques on project evaluation: a planning, development and entrepreneurial 

perspective. Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal, 27(4), 1-7. Retrieved from 

https://www.abacademies.org/articles/Financial-decision-making-and-forecasting-techniques-on-project-

evaluation-a-planning-development-1528-2686-27-4-553.pdf   

Shayery, A. J., Zayed, N. M., Islam, K. M. A., Hossain, M. F., Nitsenko, V. S., & Imran, M. A. (2022). THE IMPACT OF 

INTERNATIONALIZATION TO IMPROVE AND ENSURE QUALITY EDUCATION: A CASE STUDY OF 

DAFFODIL INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY (BANGLADESH). Natsional'nyi Hirnychyi Universytet. 

Naukovyi Visnyk, 6, 160-169. https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2022-6/160 

Wu, J.-L., Han Hou, & Han Hou. (2010, September). The dynamic impacts of financial institutions on economic growth: 

Evidence from the European Union. Journal of Macroeconomics, 32(3), 879-891. 

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmacro.2009.09.003 

Zayed, N. M., Mohamed , I. S., Islam, K. M. A., Perevozova, I., Nitsenko , V., & Morozova, O. (2022e). Factors Influencing 

the Financial Situation and Management of Small and Medium Enterprises. Journal of Risk and Financial 

Management, 15(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15120554 

 Zayed, N. M .Z., Meero, A., Rahman, A. A. A., Islam, K. M. A., Shahiduzzaman Khan Shahi, Shama Tasnim. (2021a). 

Demand and Supply-Side Analysis of Dhaka Based Online Business during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence 

from Bangladesh. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 56(3). https://doi.org/10.35741/issn.0258-

2724.56.3.47  

Zayed, N. M., Islam, K. M. A., Shahi, S. K., Rahman, M. S., & Raisa, T. S. (2021b). AN ANALYSIS ON THE EFFECTS 

OF CORONAVIRUS (COVID-19) ON THE FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT OF MULTINATIONAL 

CORPORATIONS. Australian Finance & Banking Review, 5(1), 43-53. https://doi.org/10.46281/afbr.v5i1.1015 

Zayed, N. M., Edeh, F. O., Darwish, S., Islam, K. M., Kryshtal, H., Nitsenko, V., & Stanislavyk, O. (2022a). Human 

Resource Skill Adjustment in Service Sector: Predicting Dynamic Capability in Post COVID-19 Work 

Environment. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15(9), 402. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15090402. 

Zayed, N. M., Edeh, F. O., Islam, K. M. A., Nitsenko, V., Dubovyk, T., & Doroshuk, H. (2022b). An Investigation into the 

Effect of Knowledge Management on Employee Retention in the Telecom Sector. Administrative Sciences, 12(4), 

138. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci12040138 

Zayed, N. M., Edeh, F. O., Islam, K. M. A., Nitsenko, V., Polova, O., & Khaietska, O. (2022c). Utilization of Knowledge 

Management as Business Resilience Strategy for Microentrepreneurs in Post-COVID-19 Economy. 

Sustainability, 14(23), 15789. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142315789 

Zayed, N. M., Rashid, M. M., Darwish, S., Faisal-E-Alam, M., Nitsenko, V., & Islam, K. M. A. (2022d). The Power of 

Compensation System (CS) on Employee Satisfaction (ES): The Mediating Role of Employee Motivation 

(EM). Economies, 10(11), 290. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies10110290 

 

 
Publisher’s Note: American Multidisciplinary Scientific Society stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and 

institutional affiliations. 

 

 
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee American Multidisciplinary Scientific Society, USA. This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms 

and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). 

American International Journal of Multidisciplinary Scientific Research (P-ISSN 2638-1249 E-ISSN 2638-1273) by American Multidisciplinary 

Scientific Society is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. 

https://doi.org/10.35741/issn.0258-2724.56.3.47
https://doi.org/10.35741/issn.0258-2724.56.3.47
https://doi.org/10.46281/afbr.v5i1.1015
https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15090402
https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci12040138
https://doi.org/10.3390/su142315789
https://doi.org/10.3390/economies10110290
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

