







































Copyright © CC-BY-NC 2020, CRIBFB | AIJSSR 

 

                      American International Journal of Social Science Research; Vol. 5, No. 1; 2020 
                                       ISSN 2576-103X   E-ISSN 2576-1048 

Published by Centre for Research on Islamic Banking & Finance and Business, USA 

 

     33 
 

 

Effects of Storytelling on Improving EFL Students’ Critical Thinking and 
Reading Comprehension  

 
 

Javed Sahibzada  
Senior Teaching Assistant 

English Language and Literature Department 
 Kandahar University 

Kandahar, Afghanistan  
 E-mail: sahibzada.javed@gmail.com  

 
Yar Mohammad Bahrami Ahmadzai    

Associate Professor                                                                                                              
English Language and Literature Department 

 Kabul University 
Kabul, Afghanistan  

E-mail: yarm.bahrami@gmail.com     
 

Azadkhan Niaz  
Teaching Assistant 

English Language and Literature Department 
 Kabul University 

Kabul, Afghanistan  
 E-mail: azadkhan.niaz@gmail.com   

 
Susan Hussein Laftah  
Assistance Lecturer  

Department of English Language and Literature Department 
Dhi Qar Education Directorate  

Thi-Qar, Iraq  
E-mail: samesoul.jan@gmail.com 

Abstract 
The purpose of this study is to find the effects of storytelling (ST) on improving critical thinking and reading comprehension of 
EFL students at Kandahar University. The design of the study was quasi-experimental with critical thinking and reading 
comprehension pre and posttests. Total 27 Afghan EFL students were selected based on their performance on Placement test.  
The participants of experimental group listened to their teacher telling the story. In order to find the improvement and different 
between these variables is significant the Paired Sample T-Test was administrated and the result indicates that there is significant 
improvement in post-tests in areas of reading comprehension and critical thinking in group of storytelling. However, improvement 
is higher in reading comprehension section than critical thinking.   
 
Keywords:  Critical Thinking, EFL, Reading Comprehension, Storytelling.   
 

1. Introduction  
As human being we all have somehow experiences of listening to other people telling or narrating us their own or other stories. 
Stories have been an attractive and interesting way of getting attentions. The long-life effects of our parents’ stories still existed as 
unforgettable memories of our childhood. They were telling us different types of stories for various purposes such as; fairy tells to 
entertain us, bed time tales to make us sleep or in forms fables and parables to motivate us for positivity and avoid us from negative 
deeds. Stories are playing significant role in personality development of individual or groups and their impact shouldn’t be ignored. 
The constructive parents’ advices in the form stories, have always brought the aptitude and attitudinal change into the lives of 
children. Attempting to take advantage of the undeniable fun and enjoyment in stories, teachers try to include stories in different 
classroom activities.   

mailto:sahibzada.javed@gmail.com
mailto:yarm.bahrami@gmail.com
mailto:azadkhan.niaz@gmail.com
mailto:samesoul.jan@gmail.com


Copyright © CC-BY-NC 2020, CRIBFB | AIJSSR 

 

www.cribfb.com/journal/index.php/aijssr             American International Journal of Social Science Research                 Vol. 5, No. 1; 2020 

 

34 
                         
 

 Storytelling is one of the effective ways of presenting a story and reading aloud is the second way. For different reasons, 
teacher may prefer one over the other.  Abrahmsen (1998) has found that storytelling is a very important foundation of the 
teaching profession and it can be beneficial in improving students’ speaking as well as listening skills. Sharing experiences through 
the device of storytelling enable individuals to build understanding between one another. Al-Mansour & Al-Shorman (2011) have 
found that listening to stories, read aloud helped the students developed sound listening habits and at the same time paved the way 
to promote comprehension through consistent exposure to the interesting and meaningful content of the stories. He found that 
reading story aloud has positive impact on language skills.  Storytelling may increase students’ language comprehension in quite 
remarkable ways. It can also provide moralistic lessons, long life learning and push the learners to be in touched with past 
experiences. 

 

1.1 Definition of Terms  
Storytelling:  Storytelling specifically refers to the presentation of a story without the presence of a picture book. Movements, 
sound effects, and the use of props often accompany the oral elements of the story presentation Gallets (2005). 

Critical thinking is defined as the intellectually disciplined process of actively and skillfully applying, analyzing, 
synthesizing, and or evaluating information gathered from, or generated by, observation, experience, reflection, reasoning, or 
communication, as a guide to belief and action Saadati, Tarmizi & Bayat (2010). 

Reading Comprehension: Meaning arrives because we are purposefully engaged in thinking while we read. It does not 
arrive because we have highlighted text or used sticky note or answered the comprehension worksheet Tovani (2000). 
 

1.3 Statement of Problem 
Most of the students enrolled in English language learning classes of Afghan context have difficulty in reading. Research conducted 
by Sahibzada, Saeedi & Hussaini (2018) to find out the causes of poor language skills. Their findings indicated that 83% of the 
teachers are not happy about their students’ language skills improvement. They have found that students had problems in language 
skills while entering EFL classes and after they have been taught for years, they still had problem in their foul language skills. 
However, they have more problem in their reading and listening comparing to speaking and writing.  

There is a misconception among EFL teachers that telling the stories and reading aloud are only habits confined to the 
early stages, but they are in fact vital tools used to improve literacy and improve learning skills. Reading comprehension is not only 
problem in Afghan context but it also be found in different countries and various areas. For instance, those who are taking TOFEL 
or IELTS are complaining about their week performance in reading section. Since reading required much practice and extensive 
reading habits. Haycock & Huang (2001) findings suggest that the half of all white seventeen-year old students, and about less 
than one-quarter of Latin seventeen years and less than one-fifth of African-American seventeen years old students can read at the 
level assessed by National assessment of educational progress.  

As the important element of effective reading is linked to the positive interdependence of students on comprehension, 
improving critical thinking skills that are developed through storytelling and story reading. Through storytelling, one can improve 
speaking ability, listening skills and reading strategies because storytelling relies on both the listener and the teller. This strategy 
utilizes the social element of language. Researchers have found that literacy instruction is most effective when developed through 
social interaction and collaboration with others Dugan’s (1997). 

Through storytelling teachers engage learners actively in class participation. They also make learners to construct their 
own understanding, by building upon their previous knowledge. Promoting students’ social instruction on meaningful tasks 
enhances learning. Finally, Storytelling offers unlimited opportunities for developing students’ authentic awareness and respect for 
children with diverse language and cultural backgrounds.  

On the other hand, impacts of storytelling on critical thinking and comprehension on adult learning needed to be 
comparatively studied with the intermediate learners is a gap exists to be tasted on students with different level, age and different 
context. It should be highlighted whether storytelling increase the students’ comprehension and critical thinking. According to 
Eisner, as citied in Miller & Pennycuff (2008) “The enduring outcomes of education are found in…the joy of the ride, not merely 
arriving at the destination.”  Miller & Pennycuff (2008) further suggested that Eisner’s vision will be embraced as teachers find 
ways to implement storytelling in the classroom and researchers continue to study the benefits of this pedagogical strategy on 
reading and writing achievement. Beside this, one cannot be a successful teacher using the same method in every context or every 
course. In order to cause learning, a teacher needs to adopt Eclecticism (efficient principles from different method).  

 

1.4 Objectives of the Study 
This study aims to compare the effectiveness of storytelling in improving reading comprehension and critical thinking on adult 
EFL learners.  However, if there is difference existed in the effect of storytelling on reading comprehension and critical thinking 
such difference is significant or insignificant will be another main objective of this research.  
 



Copyright © CC-BY-NC 2020, CRIBFB | AIJSSR 

 

www.cribfb.com/journal/index.php/aijssr             American International Journal of Social Science Research                 Vol. 5, No. 1; 2020 

 

35 
                         
 

1.5 Research Question 
▪ What is the effect of Storytelling on improving reading comprehension and critical thinking on EFL students? 
▪ Is there any significant difference between in Storytelling with regards of improving critical thinking and reading 

comprehension among EFL students?  

 
1.6 Importance of the Study  
Institutions around the world are working to change their traditional classes which are more passive and teachers-centered where 
only teachers are carrying responsibilities on their shoulders. Consequently, it leads their graduates having poor performance in 
markets and lack of job ready skills. They are now shifting into modern approaches which are more active where students are 
responsible to carry work done by them and term teacher is no more in use and has been replaced to the term facilitator.  One of 
the main responsibilities of a facilitator is to create a stress-free environment where students are enthusiastic for active engagement 
in the learning process and internalize it through constructivism. Thus, the facilitators in institutions should adopt the new teaching 
methodologies and adopt the new approaches used around the world to help their students bring changes into their lives. Using 
traditional methods and concepts cannot grantee the accomplishment of desired outcomes or to walk in clearly defined world of 
achievements.  

The study will open a passage for storytelling to be consider as an important tool in language teaching. It will create 
positive attitudes in students towards extensive reading and developing dispositions like curiosity, playfulness, perseverance, 
confidence, resourcefulness, and risk-taking. Although it is famous around the world, but unlike the general awareness on the 
importance of reading books, the importance of verbal storytelling is not almost emphasized in Afghan culture. Yet, the stories 
make a great contribution to teaching techniques. Stories have been used as an effective tool for developing competence in language 
learning both in acquiring native language and learning foreign languages.  

The educational value of story reading is widely accepted, especially compared to the acceptance accorded to storytelling. 
There is need for investigating the effect of storytelling. The reason adults read to children for the hope that reading exciting 
stories to children might help them in turning children in getting excited in learning in order to read books for themselves. Students 
are searching their memories for details of events they are orally presenting them and it will be easy for them to produce it as 
written form later National Council of Teachers of English (1992). They further suggest to develop cooperative class and 
instructive way, teacher and students should use storytelling to improve learning.  

The study will provide teachers with effective teaching methods based on students’ needs, interests, levels and desires. 
Storytelling is the only tool which can able us transcending into other people’s lives and evokes feelings of empathy in a way that 
a story can become alive and mind changing experience for us. It will give chance to students to express their feelings and acquire 
the second language as their first language into natural process, because storytelling and reading is a kind of natural process. We 
are usually busy in storytelling as every day routine. We are telling our busy day’s story at home and our commuting story to our 
colleagues and classmates. The study will encourage teachers to use storytelling as part of curriculum activities because of it has 
great effects on students learning outcome.  

So, the analysis of it will pave a way to the curriculum designers and instructors to include it into their curriculums and 
specially the language instructors for enhancing the language ability. The current study will pave the way for adding storytelling as 
an important tool of learning for improvement of critical thinking and reading compression which are not only helpful for reading 
but also for all language skills. 

 

2. Literature Review 
The story storytelling, as important tools for the development of students’ language ability, is widely accepted in the field of 
education and much of the study has been conducted in the effects of it on children and adult learning. The researchers have 
attempted in section of literature review to summarize the conducted studies on the effect of storytelling on learning of students 
in various geographical locations, scholars’ different view regarding storytelling and comparative researches that investigate the 
effects of storytelling and story reading on learnings and literacy development.     

2.1 Impacts of Storytelling 
Many researchers have investigated effects of storytelling on improvement literacy development through storytelling and also find 
it as tools for teaching and improving literary skills on various areas. Mello’ (2001) has found through meta-analysis eight aspect 
regarding the use of storytelling as a pedagogical strategy through students’ retellings, measures of fluency, and writing samples 
from the students.  He has found with the use of pre and posttest interview that the literacy improves through storytelling in 
academic areas including vocabulary acquisition, fluency, recalling information writing skills, self-awareness cultural knowledge 
and imagery. In addition to that, Eisner as citied in Miller & Pennycuff (2008) stated that with use of oral descriptive language, 
students’ experience of literature is developed. As it provides opportunities to develop students’ ability to increase in value and 
know the qualities conveyed in learning which in turn it develops their literacy skills in the classroom. According to Remenyi 



Copyright © CC-BY-NC 2020, CRIBFB | AIJSSR 

 

www.cribfb.com/journal/index.php/aijssr             American International Journal of Social Science Research                 Vol. 5, No. 1; 2020 

 

36 
                         
 

(2005) using storytelling as the medium of the performing arts is a key way of sharing knowledge among people as it makes 
participants to go to another setting and time place. Haven & Ducey (2007) also have found that storytelling is an effective tool 
for developing early literacy and it helps reading comprehension skills of the students.  

Besides that, storytelling is an effective means of developing students’ literacy and reading comprehension researchers 
have found them as tools to improve various language skills. The studies by the studies by Millo (2001); Phillips (1999) suggested 
that storytelling is an effective way of developing reading comprehension and literacy skills of the students.  Storytelling is a great 
way which bridge “cultural divides” providing different interpretations of the main story that teacher is telling. It assists children 
connect their previous experiences with larger world provided in the text and it promote reading comprehension in proper way of 
developing capacity of all children academically. Ta'amneh (2018) has also investigated effects of storytelling in development of 
reading comprehension skills of EFL students. He has found storytelling as an effective method for developing students' different 
language skills. He further discussed storytelling as a teaching activity, can attract the students in the teaching process and facilitates 
the learning process. He also acknowledged that students should be given stories for reading or telling those which are particularly 
close to their real-life contexts. He found out that storytelling by the EFL teachers should be promoted as it helps as an effective 
teaching technique in developing the students' reading comprehension.  

 Storytelling can be used as an effective strategy for students’ comprehension, especially for the students having reading 
comprehension problem. To boost up comprehension, teachers can help students monitor their own understanding as they read. 
One common strategy teacher often use in a whole-class format is to think-aloud (Goudvis & Harvey 2000).  

Traditional method of using text for stories which is not helpful in all contexts and every level of learners. Method of 
storytelling and story reading is effective for the children in many ways and its various impacts had been researched. Stories have 
enormous potential to help students overcome barriers that may be interfering with their learning processes. It is necessary not to 
consider them only as a fun teaching device that helps the students to feel relax but they can be used as a means to improve the 
quality of learning in the classroom. Stories are highly motivating and can help develop positive attitudes towards the foreign 
language and language learning.  They can create a desire to continue learning, raise the imagination, link fantasy and the 
imagination with the child’s real-world Ellis & Brewster (2014, P1). 

Apart from storytelling improved literacy, reading comprehension and its used as a tool for teaching various areas, 
researchers have also investigated how storytelling have contributed to the critical thinking, vocabulary development as Soleimani 
& Akbari (2013) investigated the effect of storytelling on children's learning English vocabulary. As a result, they have 
recommended that storytelling is a method that is suitable to increase English vocabulary learning among children. Their study 
showed that student’ vocabulary mastery increased accordingly. 

Listening and speaking was the interested issue for the researchers. Miller & Pennycuff (2008) concluded that storytelling 
is an effective method that combines the aesthetic ways of understanding instruction and developing the academic performance of 
learner in the areas of reading and writing. It also has the ability to promote the arts in education and motivate children to connect 
with their learning for pursuing lifelong literacy. Abrahmson (1998) has explained that storytelling is a very foundation of the 
teaching profession which can be beneficial in improving students’ speaking as well as listening skills. Sharing of experiences 
through the device of storytelling enable individuals to build understanding between one another. In addition, Furlong (2013) 
stated that storytelling is universal characteristic and it is important for everyone for their daily lives that helps in fostering 
commination. He further indicated that storytelling is effective tool for developing and creating communication in group of 
students which can elect classroom participation of reluctant reader/writers and disenchanted English students who have only see 
English class as a place of large novels with little discussion of stories are meaningful to them. Moreover, Straková, (2011) wrote 
that   storytelling belongs to language classroom as a valuable form of education and learning resource that enable and improve 
students’ speaking skills. according to Gallets (2005), storytelling enables learners’ speaking skills and it can be used as an intensive 
story reading to motivate adult students for reading in English in their spare time. Storytelling and story reading are the oldest 
form of education. Students are searching their memories for details of events they are orally presenting them and it will be easy 
for them to produce it as written form later National Council of Teachers of English (1992). They further indicated that to 
develop cooperative class and instructive way, teacher and students should use storytelling to improve learning. On the other hand, 
listening comprehension was also investigated by Al-Mansour & Al-Shorman (2011) who asserted that listening to stories, read 
aloud helped the students developed sound listening habits and at the same time paved the way to promote comprehension through 
consistent exposure to the interesting and meaningful content of the stories. He further found that reading story aloud has positive 
impact on language skills.  

Storytelling improve writing and play major role in development of writing in different ways. Since Writing requires 
thinking and can be crossed through cognitive processes.  Craig, Hull,  Haggart,  &  Crowder (2001);   Eisner as citied in Miller 
& Pennycuff (2008).  Since Writing requires thinking and can be crossed through cognitive processes. It is considered, the most 
complex skill because it goes through different stages i.e., prewriting writing and editing to reach its final product. As writing is an 
individual process which requires thinking strategies that allows individuals to express themselves competently in the other 



Copyright © CC-BY-NC 2020, CRIBFB | AIJSSR 

 

www.cribfb.com/journal/index.php/aijssr             American International Journal of Social Science Research                 Vol. 5, No. 1; 2020 

 

37 
                         
 

language. It is also a complex activity that requires a certain level of linguistic knowledge, writing conventions, vocabulary and 
grammar. Writing is a continuous process of thinking and organizing, rethinking, and reorganizing. 

Alkaaf & Al-Bulushi (2017) found out that storytelling as effective strategy that benefit teachers when they want to 
advance students’ writing skills. They further stated that learners often find it difficult to process and organize written information 
and when writing stories, they cannot always retrieve the information required for the development of the story. Besides that, they 
proposed generating relevant ideas for their stories is another dimension which they may regard as challenging.  They suggest and 
emphasized on this strategy for it works efficiently in language learning.  

As children grow and their language develops, they use storytelling in their plays to imagine events and create world.  
Even when students become more engaged in reading and writing processes, teachers can continue to use storytelling as a powerful 
classroom instrument. Children can try out their ideas, and orally rehearse before they commit their ideas to paper, thus improving 
“the flow, fluency and feel of their writing” Cremin, Mottram, Collins, Powell & Safford (2009). A study by Nicolini as citied in 
Miller & Pennycuff (2008) report a high correlation between good readers and good writers, as well as poor readers and poor 
writers. They stated that even when students become more engaged in reading and writing processes, teachers can continue to use 
storytelling and story reading as a powerful classroom instrument.  

Some researchers investigated the effects of storytelling on critical thinking. For instance, Belet & Dala (2010) have 
conducted qualitative research   on 53   the primary education pre-service teachers’ opinions about the use of storytelling to develop 
the primary school students’ critical reading skills. Their result indicated that 52 of the participants had positive opinions about 
the use of storytelling can develop critical reading skill. They also had positive opinions about the contribution of this method 
was well-suited with the skills explained in literature within the context of critical reading. The study further suggested that this 
method can develop the primary school students’ prediction skill. Besides that, Chan (2019) acknowledges that storytelling 
enhances students’ critical thinking and it allows them to explore their imaginations, practice their listening skills and experience 
new vocabulary as well as giving them the opportunity to spend quality time together. His study explained that storytelling is also 
useful for children to develop the ability to think critically; being able to interpret and reflect on information. He described that 
critical thinking skills are required in later school life, and also help with problem solving and forming opinions about various 
topics. Another study by Palmer, Harshbarger & Koch (2001) who have investigated the effect of storytelling through 
observational method and have find out that storytelling is as a vehicle for expanding children's existing oral language and 
developing their literacy abilities. They further asserted that storytelling is rich in interaction process that facilitates imagination, 
creative thinking, language abilities, and cooperative learning. Through storytelling teachers engage learners actively in class 
participation. They also make learners construct their own understanding, by building upon their previous knowledge. Promoting 
students’ social instruction on meaningful tasks enhances learning. Finally, Storytelling offers unlimited opportunities for 
developing students’ authentic awareness and respect for children with diverse language and cultural backgrounds.  

 

2.2 Research on Effects of Storytelling and Story Reading 
In this part of literature, researchers have documented comparative studies which indicate effects of storytelling and story reaching 
in academic achievements of students in various areas.  Sanaeifar (2018) investigated the effect of word exposure frequency through 
story reading and storytelling on learning collocations. He has found that the word exposure frequency through story reading and 
storytelling have statistically significant effect on collocation learning and also the story reading group performed better than the 
story telling group in learning collocations. In addition to that, the study by Gallets (2005) supports the notion that both story 
reading and storytelling can be used as part of an effective program for emerging readers. His finding suggests that storytellers are 
engaging in an activity that is enjoyable for students, and at the same time it can contribute to the educational process. His finding 
asserted that story reading and storytelling can both help children learn differently. Children who hear through story telling tend 
to remember more of the information than they hear from story reading. On the other hand, students who hear through telling 
stories appear to be more likely to show an understanding of formal elements of story structure. In both groups story reading and 
storytelling of students displayed a similar shift towards more slight types of understanding story meaning.  His study shows the 
students in the story reading group improved more than the students in the storytelling group on three of five measures. 

In addition to that, Isbell, Sobol, Lindauer & Lowrance (2004) studied the impact of storytelling and reading stories on 
development of language and comprehension of three and five years old children through the experiential group of storytelling 
and story reading group. Their findings indicated improvement in both groups. However, the storytelling group have better 
comprehension which showed through their retelling of heard stories. They also suggest that storytelling need a greater use of the 
visual imagination than in story reading. They further indicated storytelling as an effective tool for engaging students in listening 
skills development. Another study by Rivera (2016) who found Storytelling and story reading the tools to enhance reading 
comprehension. He suggests that English learning and category of Storytelling and story reading help most of the students to write 
their own productions. Her finding indicates that the use of storytelling for interaction and through listening to classmates the 
improvement of students’ own work productivity. She adds, that by using storytelling students may demonstrate and show progress 
in comprehension, recalling information, and arrangement of events in the correct order.   



Copyright © CC-BY-NC 2020, CRIBFB | AIJSSR 

 

www.cribfb.com/journal/index.php/aijssr             American International Journal of Social Science Research                 Vol. 5, No. 1; 2020 

 

38 
                         
 

On the other hand, Al-Mansour & Al-Shorman (2011) found that there is no significant difference exist in students’ achievement 
in terms of storytelling and story reading.  

Comparative study on the effect of reading story aloud and storytelling on intermediate EFL learners’ listening 
comprehension was conducted by Hemmati, Gholamrezapour & Hessamy (2015) their findings indicate that that both Storytelling 
and story reading aloud groups had positive effects on the students’ listening comprehension. However, the exact comparison of 
these two groups shows Storytelling group better performed than story reading group in posttests. They further suggest that story 
telling without aid of the printed page helps the storyteller and listener to have more connection. They have found evidence for 
storytelling as being more effective than reading aloud.  The study also found that students who listen to a story they in fact learn 
ways of listening ability.  Furthermore, the study also found out improvement of storytelling on oral skills strategies. Beside this 
storytelling promote language development and span listening skills.  

Thus, the story reading and storytelling have been studied and tested its various effects and much of the studies are 
conducted on children. The literature above is generally summarized the comparative study done on story reading and storytelling, 
its effects on students learning and developing aptitude. There was need to study on the effects of storytelling on adult intermediate 
EFL learners mainly to investigate critical thinking and comprehension effects.   

 

3. Methodology   
▪ Participants A total number of 27 intermediate junior Afghan EFL undergraduate students from the English departments 

of Languages and literature faculty and Education Faculty of Kandahar University have taken part in this study. They 
shared the same first language Pashtu and Dari and were selected through performance in placement test.  

▪ Research Design and Materials: The study is a quasi-experimental research with one experimental group. An objective 
test that contained 23 questions for measuring reading comprehension and critical thinking aspects was used as a 
placement test for selecting samples from the papulation. It was developed from reading book by Mikulecky & Jeffries 
(2003). The second instrument was used for pre and posttests to test reading comprehension and critical thinking skills. 
It had two parts and contained 38 multiple choice questions, 19 for critical thinking and 20 for reading comprehension. 
The first part aim to test critical thinking skills through 19 multiple choice questions among which 9 were by Watson 
(1980) for making inference from the given text and 10 were for critical thinking to select best ending taken from Free 
Practice Critical Thinking Test (n.d). The second part was to test reading comprehension skills which contained passages 
followed with comprehensions multiple choice questions taken from Test Prep Review (2019). The Reliability of 
instruments were tested before use through test-retest method of reliability and scores result showed stability over time 
used. The part of validity was checked for content and construct validity of all questions required for testing critical 
thinking and reading comprehension dimensions. Besides these instruments, a story collection, A World of Fiction by 
Marcus (2005) was used to present stories in group of storytelling. 

▪ Procedures: In the first phase of the study, the volunteer junior students of both English departments including Pre-
service, In-service and Night-shift took part in a placement test inside university campus. Then the qualified subjects 
who got higher marks were shifted to experimental group that contains 30 students.  They took the pretest in stress free 
environment and attend 10-week sessions of treatment in which the storytelling group listened to stories told by their 
teacher without providing them stories in hand. There was concern for ethical dimension and also to reduce possible 
confounding variables that may affected the study outcome, participants were assured about their identity to be kept 
confidential. Since the participant were given the choice of withdrawing their participation at any time and during ten-
week session some of the students withdraw their participations and some did not attend posttests and 27 remained 
took parts in posttest. After ten-week treatment 90 minutes for week the students who answered the questions of the 
posttest in equal time provided to each individual in group. 

▪ Data Analyzing Procedure: Both pre and post test score were administrated in Microsoft Excel, SPSS 24 version and 
Graph pad prism. The result was analyzed for showing percentage, mean and standard deviation. Paired Sample T-test 
was used to show the significant improvement and difference. The result for all presented in tables and graphs.    

4. Findings  
As mentioned before, the experiential study was conducted in a treatment group of storytelling to find out comparative results on 
the improvement of critical thinking and reading comprehension. The findings presented based on each research questions and for 
the questions “What is the effect of storytelling on reading comprehension and critical thinking of EFL students?” The data was 
collected in order to find the effect of storytelling on improving critical thinking and reading comprehension.  

 

 



Copyright © CC-BY-NC 2020, CRIBFB | AIJSSR 

 

www.cribfb.com/journal/index.php/aijssr             American International Journal of Social Science Research                 Vol. 5, No. 1; 2020 

 

39 
                         
 

Table 1. Storytelling Pre- and Post-Test Result 

Number  
  

Name  F/Name Critical Thinking  Reading 
Comprehension 

Pre- 
test  

Post- 
test  

Pre-test Post- test 

1 Shamsullah Gulam Muhidin 25 20 0 6 

2 Naeemullah M.Farooq 35 65 16 37 

3 Muhibullah Mayeengul 25 45 27 27 

4 Khudad Awaz 30 65 27 37 

5 Shabmum Abdul Ghani 50 70 32 37 

6 M. Zia M. Nazeem 30 50 27 37 

7 M Deen Khuridin 30 35 6 32 

8 Nooria M. Aqbaal 45 55 27 32 

9 Sayedullah Jan Gulam Jailani 35 80 27 74 

10 Sumia Qurban Ali 65 75 27 58 

  11 Khushal Abdul Salam 25 30 0 26 

12 Hamidullah Nida Mohammad 35 35 43 53 

13 Wali Mohammad Gul Mohammad 30 55 16 26 

14 Shamudin Gulam Muhidin 0 10 27 16 

15 Subhanullah Anargul 10 15 32 42 

16 Mujeburahman Gulamudin 40 45 27 32 

17 Khan Mohammad Ali Jan 25 35 16 37 

18 Hayatullah M. Esaa 30 25 11 42 

19 Zahir Shah  Sayeed Hakim 25 30 11 26.3 

20 Ahmadullah Naqeebullah 55 30 32 21 

21 Farid Ahmad Mukhtar Ahmad 25 30 16 26 

22 Sheer Zamaan  M.Zaman 45 25 6 21 

23 Naseer Ahmad Shan Gul 30 35 16 21 

24 Ezatullah  Abdul Baqi 20 35 27 42 

25 Habiudin Nasrudin 35 40 11 26 

26 Najeeullah  Akhatar Mohammad 15 30 32 47 

27 Shafiqullah  Malang 30 25 27 26 

          
Table1 above indicates pre and post results of the participants in storytelling group for reading comprehension and 

critical thinking aspect and the mean scores of them. The group of storytelling contains 27 students who attended 10 weeks’ 
course designed to find out wither story reading help in improving critical thinking and reading comprehension. Their result in 
pre and posttest indicates majority of the students who participated in storytelling course their test scores have increased in critical 
thinking and reading comprehension. Among them only few students’ marks have either decreased or did not improve. For instance, 
student one who got 25% marks in critical thinking pre-test but his marks in posttest are 20% on the other hand his score in 
posttest has increased in reading comprehension from 0% to 6% Also student three who got 27% marks in pre-test of reading 
comprehension section but his posttest contains 26%on the other hand his post test in critical thinking section increased from 
25% into 45%. In addition to that student 18 who got 30% marks in pre-test of critical thinking section his posttest decreased 



Copyright © CC-BY-NC 2020, CRIBFB | AIJSSR 

 

www.cribfb.com/journal/index.php/aijssr             American International Journal of Social Science Research                 Vol. 5, No. 1; 2020 

 

40 
                         
 

to 25% marks yet his marks have improved in reading comprehension section from 11% into 42%. Similarly, student 20 who got 
55% in critical thinking pre-test his marks deceased into 30% in posttest. His marks also decreased in reading comprehension 
into 21% from 32%. Likewise, student 22 who got 45% marks in critical thinking pre-test has decreased into 25% in post but 
on the other hand his marks improved in reading comprehension section from 6% into 21% in reading comprehension section. 
in addition to that student 27 who got 30% marks in pre-test of critical thinking his posttest result decreased into 25% and there 
is also decrease in his reading comprehension section from 27% into 26%.  

 

 

Figure 1. Pre-Test and Post-Test Result of Critical Thinking Section in Storytelling group 

Figure 1 above shows pre and post test result of critical thinking section in storytelling group. Orange color shows 
pretest result while yellow color represents post test result. Among 27 students who participated in ten-week program of 
storytelling course have improved in posttest of critical only five students’ marks decreased rather than increased in posttest which 
have been highlighted with yellow color in table 1.1.  Comparing overall majority of students’ performance have been improved 
in posttest of critical thinking section.  

 

Figure 2. Pre and Post Test Result of Reading Comprehension Section in Storytelling group 

25

35

25
30

50

30 30

45

35

65

25

35
30

0

10

40

25
30

25

55

25

45

30

20

35

15

30

20

65

45

65
70

50

35

55

80
75

30
35

55

10
15

45

35

25
30 30 30

25

35 35
40

30
25

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27

Critical Thinking Pre and Post Test Result

critical thinking  pre test critical thinking  post test

0

16

26
32

27

5

26 26 26

0

43

16

26
32

37

16
11 11

32

16

6

16

26

11

32
26

6

37

27

37 37 37
32 32

74

58

26

53

26

16

42

37
37

42

26
21

26
22 21

42

26

48

26

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27

Reading Comprehenstion Pre and Post Test Result 

Comprehension prestest Comprehension post test



Copyright © CC-BY-NC 2020, CRIBFB | AIJSSR 

 

www.cribfb.com/journal/index.php/aijssr             American International Journal of Social Science Research                 Vol. 5, No. 1; 2020 

 

41 
                         
 

Figure 2 above shows pre and post test result of reading comprehension section in storytelling group. Green line 
represents pretest result while the maroon color represents post test result. Among 27 students, only three students got lowered 
marks in post than pretest. Overall majority of students’ marks have been increased in posttest from the marks they got in pre-test.  

 

Figure 3. Comparison of Post Test Results of Critical Thinking and Reading comprehension in Storytelling group: 

Figure 3 above represents posttests result of reading comprehension and critical thinking sections of storytelling group. 
Yellow color indicates critical thinking posttest while maroon colors shows reading comprehension post test result. Students who 
participated in story telling group, their result shows they have improved in reading comprehension as well in critical thinking 
section while their results also indicate they have got higher scores in critical thinking section than reading comprehension section.  

 

 
Figure 4. Mean Scores of Reading Comprehension and Critical Thinking Pre and Post Test in Storytelling Group 

 
Figure 4.  above indicates mean scores of reading comprehension and critical thinking pre and posttest of storytelling 

group. Result shows students who participated in story telling group their mean score in pretest of critical thinking section is 
31mean score while their mean score has improved to 40 mean score. On the other hand, they have got the mean score 20 mean 
score in pretest of reading comprehension section which have been increased into 34 mean score in posttest. The means scores 
result shows there is improvement in posttests from pre-tests in both areas of critical thinking and reading comprehension. 

31.30

40.37

20.47

33.53

0.00

10.00

20.00

30.00

40.00

50.00

pretest post test pretest pst test

critical thinking Comprehension

Mean Scores of Reading Comprehension and Critical Thinking Pre 
and Post Test of Storytelling Course

20

65

45

65
70

50

35

55

80
75

30
35

55

10
15

45

35

25
30 30 30

25

35 35
40

30
25

26

37

27

37 37 37
32 32

74

58

26

53

26

16

42

32
37

42

26
21

26
21 21

42

26

48

26

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27

Comparing Critical Thinking and Reading Comprehension Post Test 
Result of Story Telling Course

critical thinking  post test Comprehension post test



Copyright © CC-BY-NC 2020, CRIBFB | AIJSSR 

 

www.cribfb.com/journal/index.php/aijssr             American International Journal of Social Science Research                 Vol. 5, No. 1; 2020 

 

42 
                         
 

However, the result also indicates there is more improvement in reading comprehension aspects of students who participated in 
story telling course than reading comprehension.   

Table 2. Mean and Standard Deviation of Story Telling Group for Pre and Post Result in Critical Thinking and Reading 
Comprehension 

Statistics 

 Critical Thinking 
in Storytelling 

Pre-test 

Critical Thinking 
in Storytelling 

Post-test 

Reading 
Comprehension in 

Storytelling Pre-test 

Reading Comprehension 
in Storytelling Post-test 

N Valid 27 27 27 27 

Missing 0 0 0 0 

Mean 31.2963 40.3704 20.4700 33.5244 

Std. Deviation 13.34401 18.39345 10.76121 13.856 

 

Table 2 above indicates mean and standard deviation of storytelling group for pre and post result of critical thinking 
and reading comprehension. M represent the mean score while SD shows standard deviation. Result indicates students in 
Storytelling group in Pre-test of critical thinking section, they got M score 31.3 and SD 13.3 and its increased into M score 40.4 
and SD 18.4 in post-test. However, in reading comprehension pre-test students got M score 20.5 and SD 10.8 which have been 
increased into M score 33.6 and SD13.9.  

Means and S.D

S.T.C
. P

RT

S. T
.C

. P
OT

S.T. R
.C

. P
RT

S. T
. R

. C
. P

OT
0

10

20

30

40

50

Pre and post test

Sc
or

e

 

Figure 5. Mean and Standard Deviation of Pre and Post Test Result of Story Telling Course for Its Critical Thinking and Reading 
Comprehension Section 

Figure 5 above represents standard deviation of pre and post test result of storytelling course for its critical chinking and 
reading comprehension section. The abbreviation S.T. stand for storytelling, C for critical thinking PRT stand for pre-test, POT 
for posttest, RC for reading comprehension. The blue color on the lift indicates mean score and SD of pretest result of critical 
thinking section in storytelling course while blue on the right represent M and SD of post-test result.  On the green on the lift 
represent pre-test result of reading comprehension and storytelling group while green on the right represent M and SD for the 
post-test of reading comprehension.  



Copyright © CC-BY-NC 2020, CRIBFB | AIJSSR 

 

www.cribfb.com/journal/index.php/aijssr             American International Journal of Social Science Research                 Vol. 5, No. 1; 2020 

 

43 
                         
 

Table 3. T-Test Mean Comparison of Reading Comprehension Pre and Post Test Result in storytelling course: Paired Samples 
Statistics 

 Mean N Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean 

Pair 1 Reading Comprehension 
Pre-test  

20.4700 27 10.76121 2.07100 

Reading Comprehension 
Post-test  

33.5244 27 13.85573 2.66654 

 

Paired Samples Correlations 

 N Correlation Sig. 

Pair 
1 

Reading Comprehension 
Pre-test & Reading 
Comprehension Post-test in   

27 .494 .009 

 

Paired Samples Test 

 Paired Differences t d
f 

Sig. (2-
tailed) 

Mean Std. 
Devia
tion 

Std. 
Error 
Mea

n 

95% Confidence 
Interval of the 

Difference 

 

Lower Upper 

P
ai
r 
1 

Reading 
Comprehension 
Pre-test - 
Reading 
Comprehension 
Post-test 

-
13.054

44 

12.67
051 

2.43
844 

-
18.066

73 

-
8.042

16 

-
5.3
54 

2
6 

.000 

 

Table 3. above indicates T-Test Mean Comparison of Reading Comprehension Pre and Post Test Result in storytelling 
group. Students at pretest of reading comprehension got the mean score of 20.5 and they got the mean score 33.6 in posttest 
which shows the difference -13.0 mean score between pre and posttest and P value .000 shows the significant improvement in 
students’ posttest.  

Table 4. Paired T-Test Mean Compression for Critical Thinking 
 

Paired Samples Statistics 

 Mean N Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean 

Pair 1 Critical Thinking Pre-test 31.296
3 

27 13.34401 2.56806 

Critical Thinking Post-test 40.370
4 

27 18.39345 3.53982 

 

Paired Samples Correlations 

 N Correlation Sig. 

Pair 1 Critical Thinking Pre-test & Critical 
Thinking Post-test 

27 .590 .001 



Copyright © CC-BY-NC 2020, CRIBFB | AIJSSR 

 

www.cribfb.com/journal/index.php/aijssr             American International Journal of Social Science Research                 Vol. 5, No. 1; 2020 

 

44 
                         
 

Table 4 above indicates paired T-Test mean compression of storytelling for critical thinking. Students in storytelling 
group in pretest of critical thinking got the mean score 31.3, however they got in posttest 33.6 and the difference between pre and 
posttest mean is -9.0 the P- value is .004 a significant improvement in posttest of storytelling group. 

Table 5. Paired T-Test Mean Compression of Posttests of Critical Thinking and Reading Comprehension  

 

Paired Samples Correlations 

 N Correlation Sig. 

Pair 
1 

Critical Thinking Post-
test & Reading 
Comprehension Post-test 

27 .564 .002 

 

Paired Samples Test 

 Paired Differences t df Sig. (2-
tailed) Mean Std. 

Deviation 
Std. 

Error 
Mean 

95% Confidence 
Interval of the 

Difference 

Low
er 

Upper 

P
ai
r 
1 

Critical Thinking 
Post-test - 
Reading 
Comprehension 
Post-test 

6.845
93 

15.57
574 

2.99755 .68
437 

13.00748 2.28
4 

26 .031 

 
Table 5 Paired T-Test Mean comparison of posttests of critical thinking and reading comprehension. Students in story 

telling group in critical thinking posttest got the mean score 40.4 while they got 33.5 mean score and there is 6.9 mean difference 
that indicated by P- value.031 less different between posttests of reading comprehension and critical thinking in storytelling course.  
 

4. Discussion  
Result of the current study shows that there is improvement in reading comprehension and critical thinking of the students in 
storytelling. However, participants’ in reading comprehension improved from 20 mean score into 34. These findings are supported 
by Phillips (1999); Ta'amneh (2018); Goudvis & Harvey (2000) who wrote that storytelling improve reading comprehension. 
The critical thinking aspect of students is also improved from 31 mean score into 40 mean score. This finding is supported by 
Belet, & Dala (2010); Chan (2019); Palmer, Harshbarger & Koch (2001) who assert that storytelling improves critical thinking.  

This study is also aligned with Rivera Pinzón (2016) who found out that storytelling and story reading as the tools to 
enhance reading comprehension. Though there is improvement in the areas of critical thinking and reading comprehension, there 
is over all mean improvement of 13 from pretest in critical thinking section in. have improved 13.0. Result of descriptive means 
shows improvement is higher in reading comprehension.  

Paired Samples Test 

 Paired Differences t Df Sig. (2-
tailed) 

Mean Std. 
Devia
tion 

Std. 
Error 
Mean 

95% Confidence 
Interval of the 

Difference 

 

Lower Upper 

Pair 1 Critical 
Thinking Pre-
test  - Critical 
Thinking Post-
test 

-
9.07
407 

15.06
633 

2.8995
2 

-
15.034

12 

-
3.1140

3 

-
3.1
30 

26 .004 



Copyright © CC-BY-NC 2020, CRIBFB | AIJSSR 

 

www.cribfb.com/journal/index.php/aijssr             American International Journal of Social Science Research                 Vol. 5, No. 1; 2020 

 

45 
                         
 

Thus, the result further needed to be tested through Paired Sample-Test for mean comparison in order to find out the 
existed difference and improvement is significant or not. It was found out there was significant improvements which indicated 
with P value .000 in the area of reading comprehension among pre and posttest and also in critical thinking areas with P value 
.004 in pre and posttest respectively. Paired Samples T-Test was used to find out with in the group difference in term of reading 
comprehension and critical thinking posttest comparison and the result indicated that, there was P value.031 that indicated less 
significant difference existed in critical thinking post-test and reading comprehension post-test.  

It is also supporting the findings by Gallets (2005) who find that Children who hear through story telling tend to 
remember more of the information. The similar findings reveled by (Isbell, et at., 2004) as improvement in comprehension aspect 
in both groups yet the storytelling group have better comprehension which showed through their retelling of heard stories. 
 

5. Conclusion and Recommendation  
Storytelling is playing a significant role in literacy development and its role in language development is vital. It empowers reading 
comprehension and critical thinking which is important for students in any major and especially for EFL students. It is important 
for individual who want to learn English he or she should think in English and thinking is improved through storytelling 
techniques. Stories contains elements as (inferences, suspense, exploring themes, genera, symbols thinking and literary terms) lead 
learners to think for the meaning and comprehension. Thus, thinking for these elements increase critical thinking. It’s through 
critical thinking one can improve language and presentation skills. Thinking clearly and systematically can advance the way we 
express our ideas.  It helps us in learning how to scrutinize the rational structure of texts and through critical thinking one can 
develop his/her comprehension aptitudes. A critical thinker has the self-awareness of logic to recognize the difference between 
rational views and careful expression.   

The findings of this study show that there is significant improvement in areas of critical thinking and reading 
comprehension through storytelling. However, the students’ achievements vary in terms of critical thinking and reading 
comprehension. That is, improvement is higher in reading comprehension which indicates 9% improvement. EFL Departments 
should include Storytelling in their curriculum which helps students in literacy development for it is plying important role in 
language skills development in various areas. The critical thinking and reading comprehension aspect have been proved through 
the current study and its impacts on development of writing, listening comprehension vocabulary building can be acknowledged 
from previous studies discussed in literature review.  

 
References 
Abrahamson, C. E. (1998). Storytelling as a pedagogical tool in higher education. Education, 118(3), 440-452. 
Alkaaf, F., & Al-Bulushi, A. (2017). Tell and Write, the Effect of Storytelling Strategy for Developing Story Writing Skills among 

Grade Seven Learners. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 7(02), 119. 
Al-Mansour, N. S., & Al-Shorman, R. E. A. (2011). The effect of teacher’s storytelling aloud on the reading comprehension of 

Saudi elementary stage students. Journal of King Saud University-Languages and Translation, 23(2), 69-76. 
Belet, S. D., & Dala, S. (2010). The use of storytelling to develop the primary school students’ critical reading skill: the primary 

education pre-service teachers’ opinions. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 1830-1834. 
Chan, C. (2019). Using digital storytelling to facilitate critical thinking disposition in youth civic engagement: A randomized 

control trial. Children and Youth Services Review, 107, 104522. 
Craig, S., Hull, K., Haggart A., & Crowder, E. (2001). Storytelling: Addressing the Literacy Needs of Diverse Learners. Teaching 

Exceptional Children. 43 (5), 46-51. Retrieved 
fromhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/004005990103300507?journalCode=tcxa 

Cremin, T., Mottram, M., Collins, F., Powell, S., & Safford, K. (2009). Teachers as readers: building communities of readers. 
Literacy, 43(1), 11-19. 

Dugan, J. (1997). Transactional literature discussions: Engaging students in the appreciation and understanding of literature. The 
Reading Teacher, 51(2), 86-96. 

Ellis, G., & Brewster, J. (2014). Tell it again!: the storytelling handbook for primary english language teachers. London: British 
Council. Penguin Books. 

Free Practice Critical Thinking Test. (n.d). Retrieved October 10, 2018, from https://www.testpartnership.com/free/critical/1/ 
Furlong , R. (2013, February) 21st Century English Education Remixing the Teaching of English for a New Generation retrieved 

28,Junavery, 2019, from http://21stcenturyenglisheducation.blogspot.com/2013/02/oral-narratives-and-story-
telling-in.html 

Gallets, M. P. (2005). Storytelling and Story Reading: A Comparison of Effects on Children's Memory and Story 
Comprehension. Retrieved from https://dc.etsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2180&context=etd 

Goudvis, A., & Harvey, S. (2000). Strategies that work: Teaching comprehension to enhance understanding. York, ME: Stenhouse. 
 

https://www.testpartnership.com/free/critical/1/
http://21stcenturyenglisheducation.blogspot.com/2013/02/oral-narratives-and-story-telling-in.html
http://21stcenturyenglisheducation.blogspot.com/2013/02/oral-narratives-and-story-telling-in.html


Copyright © CC-BY-NC 2020, CRIBFB | AIJSSR 

 

www.cribfb.com/journal/index.php/aijssr             American International Journal of Social Science Research                 Vol. 5, No. 1; 2020 

 

46 
                         
 

Haven, K. F., & Ducey, M. (2007). Crash course in storytelling. Boston: Greenwood Publishing Group. 
Haycock, K., & Huang, S. (2001). Are today's high school graduates ready? A closer look at college students: Self-efficacy and 

goal orientation. Journal of Advanced Academics, 18, 454-476. 
Hemmati, F., Gholamrezapour, Z., & Hessamy, G. (2015). The effect of teachers’ storytelling and reading story aloud on the 

listening comprehension of Iranian EFL learners. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 5(7), 1482-1488. 
Isbell, R., Sobol, J., Lindauer, L., & Lowrance, A. (2004). The effects of storytelling and story reading on the oral language 

complexity and story comprehension of young children. Early Childhood Education Journal, 32 (3), 157-163. 
Marcus, S. (Ed.). (2005). 2nd edn. A world of fiction: Twenty timeless short stories. Boston: Allyn & Bacon. 
Mello, R. (2001). Building bridges: How storytelling influences teacher and student relationships. In Proceedings, storytelling in 

the Americas conference. St. Catherine, ON: Brooks University Press ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 
ED457088) retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED457088.pdf 

Mikulecky, B. S., & Jeffries, L. (2003). 2nd edn. More reading power. New York: Longman Pearson. 
Miller, S., & Pennycuff, L. (2008). The power of story: Using storytelling to improve literacy learning. Journal of Cross-

Disciplinary Perspectives in Education, 1(1), 36-43. 
National Council of Teachers of English: Position Statement from the Committee on Storytelling. (1992). Teaching Storytelling. 

Retrieved June 27, 2019, from http://www2.ncte.org/statement/teachingstorytelling/ 
Palmer, B. C., Harshbarger, S. J., & Koch, C. A. (2001). Storytelling as a constructivist model for developing language and literacy. 

Journal of Poetry Therapy, 14(4), 199-212. 
Phillips, L. (1999). The role of storytelling in early literacy development. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 

ED444147). Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED444147.pdf 
Reading Comprehension Practice Test 1 - Test Prep Review. (2019) Retrieved October 10, 2018, from 

https://www.testprepreview.com/modules/reading1.htm 
Remenyi, D. (2005). Tell me a Story–A way to Knowledge. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methodology, 3(2), 

133-140. 
Rivera Pinzón, M. X. (2016). Storytelling & Story-Reading: A way to Enhance EFL Students' Literacies.(Master’s Thesis) 

Retrieved from University Distrital Francisco José de Calda.(Access No. 19. 1988-177). 
Saadati, F., Tarmizi, R. A., & Bayat, S. (2010). Assessing critical thinking of postgraduate students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral 

Sciences, 8, 543-548. 
Sahibzada, J., Saeedi, K.H., & Hussaini, M. A.(2018) The Causes of English Language and Literature Students’ Poor English 

Skills at Kandahar University. International Journal for Innovative Research in Multidisciplinary Field, 4(10),1-14. 
Sanaeifar, S. H. (2018). The Effect of Word Exposure Frequency through Story Reading and Story Listening on Learning 

Collocations. Language Education Studies, 4(4),1-8. 
Soleimani, H., & Akbari, M. (2013). The effect of storytelling on children's learning English vocabulary: A case in Iran. 

International Research Journal of Applied and Basic Sciences, 4(11), 4005-4014. 
Straková, Z. (2011). Using Storytelling with Intensive Reading in Adult Classes (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from University 

Masarykova). (Access No. 104497). 
Ta'amneh, M. I. (2018, September) The Effect of Using Storytelling on Developing Saudi EFL University Students' Reading 

Comprehension. Journal of Education and Practice, 9, 80-87. 
Tovani, C. (2000). I read it, but I don't get it: Comprehension strategies for adolescent readers. Portland: Stenhouse Publishers. 
Watson, G. (1980). Watson-Glaser critical thinking appraisal. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation. Retrieved October 

10, 2018, from https://www.assessmentday.co.uk/free/watson 
glaser/freetest1/Inferences/index.php?extratime=999999999999999999999 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

http://www2.ncte.org/statement/teachingstorytelling/
https://www.testprepreview.com/modules/reading1.htm
https://www.assessmentday.co.uk/free/watson%20glaser/freetest1/Inferences/index.php?extratime=999999999999999999999
https://www.assessmentday.co.uk/free/watson%20glaser/freetest1/Inferences/index.php?extratime=999999999999999999999


Copyright © CC-BY-NC 2020, CRIBFB | AIJSSR 

 

www.cribfb.com/journal/index.php/aijssr             American International Journal of Social Science Research                 Vol. 5, No. 1; 2020 

 

47 
                         
 

Acknowledgement 
This article involves many peoples’ efforts and assistance, so it would be time take this chance to express our deep gratitude to 
them.  we would give our gratitude to all participants who actively contributed through their involvement in teen week session and 
provide data for findings of this research. To the advisor Yarmommad Bahrami Ahmad Zai for his efforts and supervising the 
writing of this project with great love and patience which enabled us to complete this research. we feel that his enlightening 
suggestions, incisive comments and constructive criticism have contributed greatly to the completion of this research work. To 
have worked with him, proved to be a highly rewarding experience for us. we owe him special thanks for the time and trouble he 
had to go over the drafts. A vote of thanks to Assistant professor Khadim Hussien Saedi for his patient guidance of scholarly 
touch, Associates professor Dr. Najeebullah Rafiqi and Associates Professor Dr. Zargoon Tareen for their helps in data analysis. 
This article could never have reached its present form without their guidance.  In short, the completion of the project should be 
attributed to joint efforts of thereof.  
 
 
 
Copyrights  
Copyright for this article is retained by the author(s), with first publication rights granted to the journal. This is an open-access 
article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license 
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). 


