









































Pa
ge

 
1



Pa
ge

 
44

American Journal of  Financial 
Technology and Innovation (AJFTI)

Fintech’s Impact on the Digital Transformation of  the Qatar Insurance Sector: 
Opportunities and Challenges

Raed Elomari1*

Volume 2 Issue 1, Year 2024
ISSN: 2996-0975 (Online)

https://doi.org/10.54536/ajfti.v2i1.2387
https://journals.e-palli.com/home/index.php/ajfti

Article Information ABSTRACT

Received: June 15, 2024

Accepted: July 17, 2024

Published: December 31, 2024

This study provides a comprehensive analysis of  Qatar’s digital insurance industry using a 
conceptual framework based on established theories. The study aimed to assess different 
challenges and opportunities, including the regulatory environment, market dynamics, 
competitive strategies, and digital payment and financial inclusion in Qatar, and also fill 
a critical gap in the literature. The study uses a positivist perspective and deductive 
methodology to explore Qatar’s digital insurance sector, revealing diverse demographics and 
strong correlations between variables like regulations and competitive rivalry, highlighting 
the positive attitude towards digitization in the industry. The regression model, elucidating 
61.7% of  the variance, accentuates the pivotal role of  “Competitive Rivalry and Enhanced 
Digital Insurance Sector.” Nevertheless, non-significant contributions from “Security 
Challenges for Digitization” and “Market Competitiveness” beckon further exploration. 
The study concludes with insightful recommendations for transparency enhancements, 
digital tool exploration, and addressing new entrant barriers, offering invaluable guidance to 
industry stakeholders navigating Qatar’s dynamic digital insurance landscape.

Keywords
Competitive Rivalry, Digital 
Insurance, Financial Inclusion, 
Insurance Regulation, Qatar 
Insurance Industry, TAM

INTRODUCTION
The worldwide Fintech environment has seen remarkable 
growth, with investments reaching $34.5 billion by the 
end of  2019 (Skoric et al., 2022). However, the Middle 
East and North Africa (MENA) area, including Qatar, 
fell behind, accounting for less than 1% of  worldwide 
Fintech investments (Opportunities await: How 
InsurTech is reshaping insurance, 2016). The COVID-19 
epidemic expedited global digital transformations, 
providing the stage for significant growth in the 
MENA area (Ibrahim et al., 2020). Particularly because 
of  the National FinTech Strategy and the creation of  
the Qatar FinTech Hub (QFTH), Qatar, has become a 
prominent participant in promoting Fintech innovation 
(Hub, 2021). The country’s proactive regulatory strategy, 
demonstrated by the FinTech Office and the Qatar 
Central Bank (QCB), establishes it as a possible leader in 
Islamic FinTech (Ramiah et al., 2023). By introducing the 
National FinTech Strategy in 2019 and establishing the 
Qatar FinTech Hub (QFTH) in 2020 (Villegas-Mateos, 
2022), Qatar has made significant strides towards creating 
a strong FinTech ecosystem (Alkhazaleh, 2021; Allen, 
2021). Qatar’s potential to flourish in Islamic Fintech by 
harnessing its Islamic financial experience is significant 
(AlNasr, 2022; Cherqaoui, 2022). Digital payment 
solutions are made possible by Qatar’s expanding 
e-commerce sector, and digital wallets are becoming vital 
instruments for advancing financial inclusion as well as 
financial transactions (Dahdal et al., 2020).
Concurrently, the COVID-19 pandemic has sped up 
the digital revolution in Qatar’s insurance industry. 
Conventional insurance structures are changing as a 

result of  the move towards customer-centric strategies 
and online distribution channels (Feghali et al., 2022). 
Digital innovations such as smart contracts and telematics 
devices are transforming claims processing, product 
creation, and risk assessment (Łyskawa et al., 2019). 
The insurance industry in Qatar is expected to develop 
at a 4.7% compound annual growth rate (CAGR) and 
reach $1.9 billion by 2026 (Al Malkawie, 2020). As part 
of  this progression, Qatar Insurance Company (QIC) 
has introduced Insurtech platforms such as Anoud+. 
The Qatar Financial Centre (QFC), Qatar FinTech Hub 
(QFTH), and QIC are working together to make it easier 
for Insurtech startups to enter the Qatari market (El-
Masri et al., 2019).
The COVID-19 epidemic has driven insurtech businesses 
to take the lead in the global insurance market, which is 
exceeded $7 trillion in 2022 and expected to reach 9.91 
trillion by 2028 (Njegomir & Demko-Rihter, 2023; Statista 
& , 2023; Tripathy). Fintech has emerged as a viable 
alternative for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) 
that are facing financial difficulties. Despite the MENA 
region’s lack of  Fintech investment, Qatar’s National 
FinTech Strategy portrays the country as an innovator, 
laying the groundwork for digital transformation (Eckert 
& Osterrieder, 2020). Even though the country’s Fintech 
ecosystem is still in its early stage, it has a lot of  room to 
develop if  infrastructure and regulations are strengthened 
(Khan et al., 2023).
Understanding the potential and difficulties that come 
with this digital transition is essential as Fintech and 
digital insurance continue to grow in popularity in 
Qatar (Hujaimi et al., 2022). Addressing this gap in the 

1 MetLife Gulf, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
* Corresponding author’s e-mail: dr.raed_elomari@outlook.com



Pa
ge

 
45

https://journals.e-palli.com/home/index.php/ajfti

Am. J. Financ. Technol. Innov. 2(1) 44-56, 2024

existing research, this study presented a synthesized 
conceptual framework that integrates relevant ideas to 
comprehensively analyze the possibilities and challenges 
in the digital insurance business. The rationale lies in 
the necessity for a systematic, theoretical investigation 
to guide the development of  the insurance industry 
through digitalization in the context of  Fintech (Eling & 
Lehmann, 2018).
Furthermore, this study aimed to thoroughly analyse 
the benefits and difficulties associated with the Fintech 
landscape’s digitization of  the insurance sector, with 
a particular emphasis on Qatar. The study used a 
grounded conceptual framework to examine several 
aspects, such as the adoption of  technology, legal 
frameworks, cybersecurity nuances, market dynamics, 
and the development of  digital payment systems. The 
main objective is to give policymakers, academics, and 
stakeholders an enlightened perspective on the changing 
environment of  digital insurance. Through this, the study 
has made a significant contribution to the constantly 
changing Fintech and digital insurance sector. Given that 
the insurance business growth in Qatar, it is critical to 
comprehend the prospects and obstacles in this field. 
Policymakers may use the results to develop regulatory 
frameworks, industry participants can use the insights 
to make strategic decisions, and scholars can add to 
the academic discussion on digitalization’s disruptive 
potential in the insurance business.

LITERATURE REVIEW
Global Fintech Acceleration and Qatar
The worldwide fintech business has grown at an 
exponential rate over the last decade, with investments 
reaching $34.5 billion by the end of  2019. The Middle 
East and North Africa (MENA) area, on the other hand, 
accounted for less than 1% of  worldwide investments 
(Pant, 2020). The COVID-19 epidemic has, therefore, 
expedited the global financial institutions’ digital transition 
and laid the groundwork for digital growth in the Middle 
East and North Africa (MENA). The MENA area, which 
includes Qatar, has seen a notable shift towards online 
commercial activity and contactless payments throughout 
the COVID and post-COVID periods (Abidi et al., 2022). 
Financial regulators in developing fintech countries, such 
as Qatar, have taken a proactive approach to fintech 
regulation, assuring consumer safety and financial system 
stability (Sadigov et al., 2020). In addition, the growing 
dependence on digital platforms has sparked worries 
about cyber security threats (Lallie et al., 2021), driving up 
cyber security expenditures and necessitating coordinated 
plans to drive digital transformation aggressively (Wilson, 
2020).
Furthermore, Qatar has advanced significantly in creating 
a strong fintech environment. The National FinTech 
Strategy of  Qatar was released in December 2019 and 
was based on the work of  the National FinTech Taskforce 
that was formed in 2017 (Hub, 2021). Through support 
from the Qatar Central Bank (QCB), the plan calls for 

the creation of  the Qatar FinTech Hub (QFTH) in April 
2020. Applications for QFTH’s incubator and accelerator 
programs come from all around the world. Additionally, 
the QCB formed its FinTech Office, whose duties include 
enacting rules and carrying out fintech goals (Khan et al., 
2023).
Consequently, Qatar has an intriguing opportunity 
to harness its Islamic financial knowledge and gain 
a competitive advantage in Islamic technology. 
Opportunities for Qatar to flourish in the Islamic 
fintech sector include shariah-compliant venture 
capital investments and Islamic RegTech. Qatar might 
encourage Islamic venture capital investments in 
fintechs by providing incentives and collaborating with 
Islamic investment banks (Muneeza & Mustapha, 2021). 
Additionally, alternative lenders and Internet banks can 
reach the SME sector by offering specialized financial 
facilities and affordable small company loans (Gopal & 
Schnabl, 2022).
In addition, the expanding e-commerce market in 
Qatar presents opportunities for providers of  payment 
solutions to meet the growing need for contactless 
and digital payment gateways (Haron, 2016). With the 
ability to conduct banking, make payments, and send 
money without requiring a traditional bank account, 
digital wallets can also benefit low-income workers who 
are underprivileged or haven’t financed at all (Hassan 
& Shukur, 2019). Nonetheless, sustained endeavors 
in regulatory structures, cybersecurity protocols, and 
global partnerships will be imperative for the expeditious 
advancement of  Fintech in Qatar.

Digitalization in the Insurance Sector
The COVID-19 crisis has catapulted the insurance sector 
into a critical stage of  digital transformation, elevating 
digitization from a strategic choice to an absolute must. 
The insurance industry is seeing a transformation in its 
conventional business structures and value chain due to 
digitization (Cherqaoui, 2021). Prior to the pandemic, the 
shift to digital technology was underway, with an emphasis 
on online distribution channels and customer-centric 
strategies. Advanced digital technologies, however, aim to 
enhance market dynamics and competitiveness through 
openness, comparability, reduced transaction costs, and 
the expanded reach of  online platforms, going beyond 
efficiency advantages (Aidrous et al., 2021). M. Eling and 
M. Lehmann assert that the effects of  digitization may 
be seen at every stage of  the value chain, from sales and 
customer service to claim reporting (Eling & Lehmann, 
2018).
Furthermore, online platforms and aggregator tools have 
changed the power balance, allowing customers to access 
information and evaluate items independently. Conversely, 
risk assessment, product innovation, and claims 
processing have seen substantial changes as a result of  
digital technologies, including telematics devices, big data 
analytics, and smart contracts (Doss, 2020). The obstacles 
associated with the insurance sector’s digitalization include 



Pa
ge

 
46

https://journals.e-palli.com/home/index.php/ajfti

Am. J. Financ. Technol. Innov. 2(1) 44-56, 2024

the requirement for large-scale, unstructured dataset 
analysis, ethical and regulatory issues surrounding the 
use of  big data, and the introduction of  new and current 
insurance products (Cappiello & Cappiello, 2018; Eckert 
& Osterrieder, 2020). The move towards on-demand 
insurance markets, cyber risk insurance, and telematics 
insurance is indicative of  how digitalization can change 
industries completely. To guarantee sustainable growth in 
the digital age, issues with data privacy, cybersecurity, and 
the moral use of  consumer information must be resolved 
(Bohnsack et al., 2022).
Swiss Re’s World Insurance Report projects that by the 
end of  2022, insurance premiums reached $8.89 trillion 
globally, offering a substantial opportunity for insurance 
companies operating around the globe (Bohnsack et al., 
2022). The worldwide COVID-19 epidemic has expedited 
insurers’ digital transition, elevating Insurtech firms to 
the fore. The insurance market in Qatar is projected to 
develop at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of  
4.7% from 2021 to 2026 when it is expected to reach 
$1.9 billion (Eckert & Osterrieder, 2020). In an effort 
to improve operational effectiveness, Qatar Insurance 
Company (QIC) has also created Insurtech platforms and 
subsidiaries. The Anoud+ platform is provided by Anoud 
Technologies, a QIC company that provides IT services 
with headquarters in QFC. It includes a variety of  features, 
including reinsurance administration and customer 
relationship management. QIC’s endeavors, such as 
organizing an Insurtech Hackathon and introducing a 
comprehensive online platform for insurance policies, 
exhibit a dedication to promoting creativity within the 
Insurtech domain (Sharar & Earley, 2018).
Furthermore, to facilitate Insurtech businesses’ entry into 
the Qatari market, The Qatar Financial Centre (QFC), 
Qatar Fintech Hub (QFTH), and QIC work together. 
These organizations organize seminars and activities 
that highlight Insurtech’s potential in Qatar’s finance 
scene. Qatar has substantial development potential for 
Insurtech businesses, given its 1% insurance penetration 
rate. This may be attributed to many factors, such as 
rising consumer awareness, regulatory laws that facilitate 
growth, and government initiatives delineated in the 
National Fintech Strategy (Lynn et al., 2019). The global 
insurance landscape is changing due to the digitalization 
of  the insurance business, with Insurtech being a key 
player in this change. Driven by factors including internet 
penetration, technological acceptance, and government 
assistance, Qatar’s emerging Insurtech business is primed 
for tremendous development. To guarantee the sustainable 
expansion of  Insurtech in Qatar and throughout the 
world, the critical evaluation highlights the necessity to 
address issues with data privacy, cybersecurity, and ethical 
considerations (Xu & Zweifel, 2020).

Use-Cases and Challenges of  Digitization in the 
Insurance Sector
The insurance sector is currently experiencing a digital 
transition that presents a range of  possibilities and 

difficulties for industry participants. The insurance 
industry is becoming more digitally connected, but there 
are drawbacks as well (Cappiello & Cappiello, 2018; 
Svetlana, 2016). For example, there is a need to integrate 
big data and artificial intelligence (AI), two important 
technical enablers. Order to transform consumer 
relationships, boost operational effectiveness, and change 
the competitive environment, it also entails digging into 
important numerical data. Its capabilities for gathering, 
processing, and evaluating vast volumes of  client data 
highlight big data’s importance for insurers (Nguyen et al., 
2023).
The value of  capital invested in insurance tech startups, 
for example, increased significantly globally throughout 
2012–2017, from $326 million to $2.134 billion, and 
the number of  acquisitions increased from 86 to 247 
(Statista, 2019b; Nicoletti & Nicoletti, 2021). According 
to Eling and Lehmann (2018), big data analytics improves 
insurers’ comprehension of  their clientele by offering 
insightful information gleaned from semi-structured and 
unstructured data, including social media. This capacity is 
essential for producing insights and enhancing decision-
making procedures (Eling & Lehmann, 2018).
Moreover, the utilization of  artificial intelligence, 
including machine learning and deep learning, is crucial 
in obtaining advantages from large and customer data 
sets. Digitalization of  insurance is receiving significant 
attention from insurance businesses, as seen by the rapid 
rise in global expenditures on machine learning algorithms 
and their iterative training procedures (Łyskawa et al., 
2019). According to Brenner (2019), artificial intelligence 
(AI) gives insurers tools for predictive analytics, such as 
Extreme Gradient Boosting approaches and helps them 
better segment their consumer base (Brenner et al., 2022).
Consequently, insurers employ AI and big data for an 
array of  applications to improve client experiences and 
optimize workflows. Authorization procedures are made 
simpler by facial recognition, which improves client 
satisfaction in both sales and service. By automatically 
analyzing photographs, claims management uses image 
recognition to speed up operations. Insurance companies 
may evaluate consumer emotions during interactions 
by using convolutional neural networks for emotion 
identification, which leads to increased customer 
engagement (Pomazan et al., 2023). However, identifying 
a single metric for gauging digitalization in insurance 
firms remains a difficulty, even in light of  the sharp 
increase in worldwide expenditures in this area. Bohnert, 
Fritzsche, and Gregor (2019) state that insurance firms 
are investigating new avenues in information technology, 
including drones, satellites, telematics, voice biometrics, 
big data analytics, omni-channels, and the Internet of  
Things (Bohnert et al., 2019).
Both revolutionary possibilities and difficulties are 
brought about by the insurance industry’s overall 
digitalization, which is fueled by big data and AI. The 
use cases that were presented highlight the potential 
advantages of  digitalization, and these include client 



Pa
ge

 
47

https://journals.e-palli.com/home/index.php/ajfti

Am. J. Financ. Technol. Innov. 2(1) 44-56, 2024

segmentation, Robo-advisory, and enhanced consumer 
experiences (Eckert & Osterrieder, 2020). For digital 
technologies to be used in the insurance industry in a 
way that is both sustainable and successful, issues like the 
absence of  standardized procedures must be addressed 
(Bandyopadhyay & Sen, 2011). The data presented 
suggests that there is a strong and increasing emphasis on 
the transformative potential of  digital technology within 
the insurance business. Global patterns in insurance 
digitization are noteworthy (Hanafizadeh & Amin, 2023).

Literature Gap
The presented literature analysis provided an in-depth 
analysis of  global fintech and insurance digitalization 
trends, with an emphasis on Qatar (Göll & Zwiers, 
2018). The lack of  a synthesized conceptual framework 
that incorporates pertinent theories to methodically 
analyze the potential and difficulties posed in the digital 
insurance sector, however, creates a significant vacuum in 
the literature. Closing this gap is essential to a systematic, 
theoretical investigation of  the topic.

Conceptual Framework 
The study develops an integrated conceptual model 
drawing from several established theories to both examine 
challenges and opportunities within the emerging digital 
insurance sector as well as guide survey design. However, 
an overreliance on conceptual abstraction risks limiting 
the model’s practical relevance and ability to generate 
actionable insights (Johnson et al., 2019).  The study 
applies Rogers’ Diffusion of  Innovations theory and 
the Technology Acceptance Model to analyze customer 
and insurer adoption of  digital technologies. While 
these provide a foundational understanding of  adoption 
drivers, they may only partially capture disruption in 
immature industries (Ching et al., 2020). 
Furthermore, Porter’s Five Forces is used to assess 
competitive dynamics but could overlook issues in 
rapidly evolving digital landscapes (Ching et al., 2020). 
The Resource-Based View helps identify capabilities for 
competitive advantage but also struggles with dynamic 
markets (Zahra, 2021). Regulatory compliance theories 
and the TOE framework aim to understand compliance 
difficulties and cybersecurity measures’ organizational/
environmental aspects (Zahra, 2021). However, more 
than these may be needed to anticipate the regulation of  
novel technologies or future threats.
Lastly, financial inclusion and ethical decision-making 
theories also inform related opportunities and challenges. 
While useful baseline perspectives, such established 
theories alone need to be more incremental to guide 
disruption. Overall, leveraging diverse conceptual 
frameworks offers a structured starting point. However, 
overreliance on established theories could constrain the 
model’s capacity to explore truly disruptive scenarios 
and generate pragmatic strategy recommendations for 
navigating ongoing transformation in this complex, 
uncertain industry domain (Zahra, 2021).

Research Design
The study adopts a quantitative research design to 
investigate the opportunities and challenges in developing 
the insurance industry through digitalization in the context 
of  Fintech. A positivist philosophical perspective guides 
the research, utilizing a deductive approach for hypothesis 
testing and drawing precise conclusions (Casula et al., 
2021). The chosen quantitative methodology ensures 
objectivity and facilitates the collection of  extensive data 
from a large population (Casula et al., 2021).

Data Collection
Primary data is collected through the distribution 
of  structured survey questionnaires among digital 
insurance professionals in Qatar. The survey employs 
a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from “Strongly Agree” 
to “Strongly Disagree,” to gauge perspectives on the 
opportunities and challenges associated with Fintech 
and digitalization in the insurance sector (Kimberly et 
al., 2022). The survey methodology is cost-effective, 
enabling the collection of  diverse opinions from a broad 
population, thereby minimizing bias in the outcomes 
(Nayak & Narayan, 2019).

Sampling and Analysis
A purposive sampling technique, a non-probability 
approach, is employed to select participants with expertise 
in digital insurance and Fintech within the Qatari context 
(Tohang et al., 2021). The sample comprises 264 digital 
insurance professionals, out of  which 250 participants’ 
responses were selected for final analysis, ensuring 
participants possess relevant knowledge and competence 
related to the study’s subject.
SPSS software is utilized for statistical analysis, 
encompassing descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, 
and regression analysis to explore variable relationships 
and test hypotheses (Manzoor et al., 2019). Ethical 
considerations, including confidentiality and informed 
consent, are strictly followed throughout the research 
process (KANG & Hwang, 2021). The final dataset 
ensures a robust and representative sample for drawing 
meaningful conclusions regarding the impact of  Fintech 
on the digital insurance landscape in Qatar. 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Results
Demographics 
The results are illustrated in Figure 1. shows the gender 
distribution indicates a predominantly male representation 
(70.5%), while females make up 29.1%. In terms of  
professional experience, the majority fall within the 3-5 
years category (43.8%), followed by 6-7 years (23.5%), 
1-2 years (19.1%), and more than 8 years (13.1%). These 
demographics highlight a diverse range of  experience 
levels within the digital insurance industry, providing 
valuable insights from professionals with varying tenures 
in Qatar’s Insurance sector.



Pa
ge

 
48

https://journals.e-palli.com/home/index.php/ajfti

Am. J. Financ. Technol. Innov. 2(1) 44-56, 2024

Compliance and Digital Integration in Qatar’s 
Insurance Sector
Figure 2. Illustrated survey responses regarding 
regulatory compliance’s role in the growth of  the 
digital insurance industry in Qatar, a noteworthy 64% 
of  participants agree or strongly agree that insurance 
companies adhere to digital practices as per regulatory 
frameworks. Moreover, a substantial 71.6% believe that 
regulatory compliance significantly influences decision-

making processes for digital technology initiatives 
in the industry. Additionally, 74.4% of  respondents 
acknowledge a good understanding of  digital regulations 
imposed by authorities among insurance professionals, 
while 62.8% perceive that regulatory compliance 
enhances the credibility of  digital insurance services. 
These findings emphasize the pivotal role of  regulatory 
frameworks in shaping and enhancing digital practices 
within Qatar’s insurance landscape.

Figure 1: Demographics

Figure 2: Compliance and Digital Integration 



Pa
ge

 
49

https://journals.e-palli.com/home/index.php/ajfti

Am. J. Financ. Technol. Innov. 2(1) 44-56, 2024

Building Trust through Data Security and Ethical 
Practices in Qatar’s Insurance Industry
The results are presented in Figure 3. Showing the 
participant’s perceptions on data security and ethical 
practices, it is evident that a majority (76.8%) strongly 
agree or agree that insurance companies in Qatar prioritize 
robust cybersecurity measures. However, concerns arise 
regarding transparency, with only 14% strongly agreeing 
that there is transparency in how customer data is handled 

and 72.8% agreeing. Moreover, 74% of  participants 
emphasize a strong industry emphasis on ethical 
considerations in digital practices, while 77.2% believe 
that ethical practices positively impact customer trust in 
digital insurance. These results highlight the imperative 
need for enhancing transparency in data handling 
processes to foster trust, even as ethical considerations 
are acknowledged as pivotal in building trust in Qatar’s 
digital insurance landscape.

Figure 3: Data Security and Ethical Practices in Qatar’s Insurance Industry

Market Dynamics and Digital Competitiveness
Figure 4. Illustrated the impact of  market dynamics and 
competitiveness in Qatar’s insurance sector, which reveals 
a positive perception toward digitalization. A significant 
portion (74%) believe that digitalization enhances market 
competitiveness, emphasizing a transformative influence. 
Furthermore, 65.1% strongly agree or agree that 
insurance companies actively leverage digital technologies 
for a competitive edge, showcasing an industry-wide 
commitment to digital innovation. Participants (58%) 

strongly agree that market dynamics have fundamentally 
changed due to digital transformation, highlighting the 
profound impact on the insurance landscape. However, 
respondents express some reservations, with 90.8% 
acknowledging the need for further exploration of  how 
digital tools enable the delivery of  unique and innovative 
services. These findings underline the industry’s evolving 
nature and the ongoing quest for innovative digital 
solutions.



Pa
ge

 
50

https://journals.e-palli.com/home/index.php/ajfti

Am. J. Financ. Technol. Innov. 2(1) 44-56, 2024

influence the bargaining power of  both customers 
and suppliers, indicating an intricate relationship with 
stakeholders. Additionally, 67.2% recognize digital 
resources as contributors to a competitive advantage 
in the digital insurance market. However, there are 
reservations, with 88.8% neutrally or affirmatively 
agreeing that digital advancements pose barriers for new 
entrants. These results underscore the nuanced dynamics 
of  digitalization, showcasing both its potential benefits 
and challenges in fostering competitive environments.

Navigating Competitive Realities in Qatar’s 
Insurance Sphere
Figure 5 shows insight into participant perceptions 
on the impact of  digital advancement and increasing 
competitive rivalry in Qatar’s insurance sector and unveils 
insights into industry perceptions. A significant majority 
(56.8%) acknowledge that digitalization has a substantial 
impact on competitive rivalry, reflecting an awareness 
of  the transformative effects of  digital technologies. 
Respondents (58.8%) believe that digital technologies 

Figure 4: Market Dynamics and Digital Competitiveness



Pa
ge

 
51

https://journals.e-palli.com/home/index.php/ajfti

Am. J. Financ. Technol. Innov. 2(1) 44-56, 2024

Co-Relation Analysis
The correlation analysis reveals strong and significant 
relationships among key variables in Qatar’s digital 
insurance landscape. Challenges and adoption of  
digitization exhibit positive correlations with the 
impact of  regulatory frameworks (r = 0.443, p < 0.01) 
and competitive rivalry in the digital insurance sector 
(r = 0.717, p < 0.01). Notably, security challenges for 

digitization are strongly correlated with challenges and 
adoption (r = 0.516, p < 0.01) and competitive rivalry 
(r = 0.719, p < 0.01). Furthermore, competitive rivalry 
shows a significant positive correlation with market 
competitiveness (r = 0.602, p < 0.01). These robust 
correlations underscore the interconnectedness and 
interdependence of  factors influencing the digital 
insurance landscape in Qatar.

Figure 5: Navigating Competitive Realities in Qatar’s Insurance Sphere

Table 1: Correlations

C
ha

lle
ng

es
 a

nd
 

A
do

pt
io

n 
of

 
D

ig
iti

za
tio

n

Im
pa

ct
 o

f 
R

eg
ul

at
or

y 
Fr

am
ew

or
ks

Se
cu

ri
ty

 
C

ha
lla

ng
es

 F
or

 
D

ig
iti

za
tio

n

C
om

pe
tit

iv
e 

R
iv

al
ry

 A
nd

 
E

nh
an

ce
d 

D
ig

ita
l 

In
su

ra
nc

e 
Se

ct
or

M
ar

ke
t 

C
om

pe
tit

iv
en

es
s

Challenges and Adoption of 
Digitization

1 .443** .516** .717** .429**
250 250 250 250 250

Impact of Regulatory 
Frameworks

.443** 1 .270** .189** .228**
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .003 .000
N 250 250 250 250 250

Security Challanges For 
Digitization

.516** .270** 1 .719** .811**
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000
N 250 250 250 250 250

Competitive Rivalry And 
Enhanced Digital Insurance 
Sector

Pearson Correlation .717** .189** .719** 1 .602**
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .003 .000 .000
N 250 250 250 250 250

Market Competitiveness Pearson Correlation .429** .228** .811** .602** 1
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000
N 250 250 250 250 250

** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

Model Fit
The model demonstrates a good fit, with a substantial 
R-square value of  0.617, indicating that approximately 

61.7% of  the variance in challenges and adoption of  
digitization is explained by the included predictors, as 
presented in Tables 2,3 and 4. The ANOVA results are 



Pa
ge

 
52

https://journals.e-palli.com/home/index.php/ajfti

Am. J. Financ. Technol. Innov. 2(1) 44-56, 2024

highly significant (p < 0.001), suggesting that the model 
is a meaningful improvement over the null model. The 
reliability statistics reveal a Cronbach’s Alpha of  0.823, 

indicating a high level of  internal consistency among 
the 20 items, enhancing the overall reliability of  the 
model.

Table 2: Reliability 
Model Variables Entered Variables 

Removed
Method

1 Market Competitiveness, Impact of Regulatory Frameworks, Competitive Rivalry 
And Enhanced Digital Insurance Sector, Security Challanges For Digitizationb

. Enter

a. Dependent Variable: Challenges and Adoption of Digitization
b. All requested variables entered.

Table 3: Model Summary 
Model R R Square Adjusted 

R Square
Std. Error of  
the Estimate

Change Statistics
R Square 
Change

F 
Change

df1 df2 Sig. F 
Change

1 .785a .617 .610 .448 .617 98.496 4 245 .000
a. Predictors: (Constant), Market Competitiveness, Impact of  Regulatory Frameworks, Competitive Rivalry And Enhanced Digital 
Insurance Sector, Security Challanges For Digitization

Table 4: ANOVAa

Model Sum of  Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
1 Regression 79.214 4 19.804 98.496 .000b

Residual 49.260 245 .201
Total 128.474 249

a. Dependent Variable: Challenges and Adoption of  Digitization
b. Predictors: (Constant), Market Competitiveness, Impact of  Regulatory Frameworks, Competitive Rivalry And Enhanced Digital 
Insurance Sector, Security Challanges For Digitization

Regression Analysis
The regression analysis is in Table 5.  indicates that the 
model is statistically significant (F(4, 245) = 98.496, p < 
0.001), suggesting that the included predictors collectively 
contribute to explaining the variance in challenges 
and adoption of  digitization. Among the predictors, 
“Competitive Rivalry and Enhanced Digital Insurance 
Sector” has the most substantial impact (Beta = 0.721, p < 

0.001), followed by “Impact of  Regulatory Frameworks” 
(Beta = 0.331, p < 0.001). However, “Security Challenges 
for Digitization” and “Market Competitiveness” do 
not significantly contribute. The constant term is not 
significant (p = 0.090). Overall, the model underscores 
the importance of  competitive dynamics and regulatory 
influence in shaping digitization challenges in the 
insurance sector.

Table 5: Coefficientsa

Model Unstandardized 
Coefficients

Standardized 
Coefficients

t Sig.

B Std. Error Beta
1 (Constant) -.254 .149 -1.701 .090

Impact of  Regulatory Frameworks .474 .059 .331 8.064 .000
Security Challanges For Digitization -.068 .073 -.074 -.942 .347
Competitive Rivalry And Enhanced Digital 
Insurance Sector

.651 .051 .721 12.653 .000

Market Competitiveness -.023 .073 -.021 -.314 .754
a. Dependent Variable: Challenges_and_Adoption_of_Digitization

Discussion 
The study’s conceptual framework, grounded in 
established theories, provides a robust foundation for 
exploring the complexities of  the digital insurance sector 

in Qatar. Drawing on Technological Acceptance and 
Innovation Adoption Theories, the framework illuminates 
how customers and insurers embrace digital technology, 
emphasizing strategic innovation opportunities and 



Pa
ge

 
53

https://journals.e-palli.com/home/index.php/ajfti

Am. J. Financ. Technol. Innov. 2(1) 44-56, 2024

addressing resistance factors (Schilling, 2013). Regulatory 
Environment and Compliance variables are integrated 
to comprehend the impact of  regulatory frameworks 
on industry practices, allowing insurers to conform to 
changes proactively (Grima et al., 2020). Cybersecurity 
and Ethical Considerations, informed by the Technology, 
Organization, and Environment (TOE) framework, 
tackle data privacy and ethical digital behavior, which is 
essential for sustainable growth (Ullah et al., 2021). Market 
Dynamics and Competitive Strategies are incorporated 
into the survey to analyze competitive dynamics and 
identify internal capabilities for a digital edge (Wang & 
Gao, 2021). This comprehensive assessment set enables 
us to empirically validate, enhance, or expand these 
theoretical underpinnings.
Furthermore, the study adopted a quantitative approach, 
aligning with a positivist paradigm and employing 
deductive reasoning as its research design. This method 
ensures objectivity and extensive data collection from 
digital insurance professionals in Qatar (Al-Qurashi, 
2017). The study has utilized a diverse sample, enriching 
the study’s insights with varying experience levels within 
Qatar’s digital insurance industry (Maouchi et al., 2022). 
The findings on compliance underscore the industry’s 
adherence to digital practices and the pivotal role of  
regulatory frameworks in shaping digital practices (Maouchi 
et al., 2022). Furthermore, examining data security and 
ethical practices, the majority recognize the industry’s 
emphasis on robust cybersecurity measures is positive. 
However, concerns about transparency in customer data 
handling reveal a critical need for improvement. The 
positive correlation between ethical practices and customer 
trust underscores their interconnectedness, emphasizing 
the imperative for transparent data processes in fostering 
trust (Halim et al., 2023).
The study findings also reflect that market dynamics 
and digital competitiveness reflect a positive industry 
outlook on digitalization, highlighting its transformative 
influence (Halim et al., 2023). Acknowledging the need 
for further exploration indicates an industry aware 
of  ongoing challenges and committed to innovative 
solutions; navigating competitive realities reveals industry 
awareness of  digitalization’s substantial impact on rivalry, 
bargaining power, and competitive advantage. However, 
concerns about barriers for new entrants signal a nuanced 
understanding of  digital advancements’ potential 
challenges (Nicoletti, 2020).
The positive correlations identified in the study between 
challenges and the adoption of  digitization, the impact 
of  regulatory frameworks, and competitive rivalry are 
consistent with Kimwaki’s work, underscoring the 
intertwined dynamics in the digitalization landscape. 
These findings reinforce the idea that challenges in 
adopting digitization are not isolated but influenced by 
regulatory frameworks and the competitive environment 
(Kimwaki, 2023).
Ibrahim et al. (2021) suggest that stringent regulatory 
frameworks can both catalyze and hinder digital 

adoption(Ibrahim & TrubyJon, 2021). The significant 
correlation between challenges and regulatory impact (r 
= 0.443, p < 0.01) suggests that navigating regulatory 
complexities is a substantial hurdle in the digitalization 
journey. This aligns with studies emphasizing the pivotal 
role of  regulatory environments in shaping organizational 
practices during technological transitions(Knight & 
Wójcik, 2018; Park & Kim, 2020). However, the lack 
of  significance for security challenges and market 
competitiveness in the regression analysis prompts 
further exploration. While security challenges may not 
have a direct impact on digitization challenges in the 
model, their real-world importance is well-documented 
(Kshetri, 2018). Future research should delve into the 
nuanced ways security concerns influence digitalization 
strategies.
Moreover, the non-significant contribution of  market 
competitiveness in the model contradicts existing 
literature on the transformative impact of  digital 
strategies on market dynamics (Ali et al., 2023; Rodríguez-
Espíndola et al., 2022). This discrepancy necessitates 
a more nuanced investigation into the specific market 
conditions influencing the adoption of  digital initiatives 
within the insurance sector. Critically assessing the 
findings, the positive correlation between challenges 
and adoption of  digitization, impact of  regulatory 
frameworks (r = 0.443, p < 0.01), and competitive rivalry 
(r = 0.717, p < 0.01) aligns with literature highlighting the 
interconnected nature of  these factors in digitalization 
processes (Demeter et al., 2023; Kumar & Bhatia, 2021). 
However, the lack of  significance for security challenges 
and market competitiveness in the regression analysis 
calls for a nuanced exploration of  these aspects in future 
research, considering their potential significance in real-
world scenarios.
The high R-square value indicates a substantial proportion 
of  variance in challenges and adoption of  digitization 
is explained by the included predictors, suggesting the 
model’s reliability. Nonetheless, the study could benefit 
from further exploration of  additional variables, such 
as customer perceptions and external market forces, 
to enhance its explanatory power. The research design, 
while robust, could strengthen its theoretical grounding 
by incorporating qualitative elements to provide a more 
holistic understanding in future research (Sreedharan V 
& Saha, 2021; Wiegard & Breitner, 2019). The survey 
methodology’s reliance on self-reporting introduces 
potential biases, necessitating cautious interpretation of  
the results. Future studies could employ mixed-methods 
approaches for a more comprehensive exploration of  the 
digital insurance landscape (Kirkpatrick et al., 2019).
Overall, the study’s findings contribute valuable insights 
into the digital insurance sector in Qatar. The positive 
industry outlook, coupled with identified challenges, 
provides a nuanced understanding of  the dynamic digital 
landscape (Ghosh et al., 2022). Based on the study results, 
transparency improvements, further exploration of  digital 
tools, and addressing barriers for new entrants should 



Pa
ge

 
54

https://journals.e-palli.com/home/index.php/ajfti

Am. J. Financ. Technol. Innov. 2(1) 44-56, 2024

be prioritized by industry stakeholders in navigating 
the evolving terrain. Building on this foundation, future 
research could delve deeper into customer perceptions, 
emerging technologies, and the interplay of  external 
market forces.

CONCLUSION 
In conclusion, this study addressed a critical l gap by 
providing a synthesized conceptual framework that 
incorporates established theories to comprehensively 
examine the complexities of  the digital insurance sector 
in Qatar. The adoption of  a quantitative research design 
and a robust theoretical foundation allowed for a nuanced 
exploration of  challenges and opportunities. The high 
R-square value attests to the model’s reliability, revealing 
that approximately 61.7% of  the variance in challenges 
and adoption of  digitization is explained by the included 
predictors. The positive correlations among challenges, 
regulatory impact, and competitive rivalry align with 
existing literature, emphasizing the interconnected nature 
of  these factors. However, the non-significant contribution 
of  security challenges and market competitiveness calls 
for further exploration in future research. The study’s 
findings offer valuable insights for industry stakeholders, 
guiding efforts to enhance transparency, explore digital 
tools, and address barriers for new entrants in the ever-
evolving digital insurance landscape in Qatar.

REFERENCES 
Abidi, N., El Herradi, M., & Sakha, S. (2022). Digitalization 

and resilience: Firm-level evidence during the COVID-19 
pandemic. International Monetary Fund.

Aidrous, I. A., Asmyatullin, R. R., & Glavina, S. G. 
(2021). The development of  the digital economy: 
GCC countries’ experience. In Industry competitiveness: 
Digitalization, management, and integration: Volume 2.

Al-Qurashi, H. A. (2017). Investigating the impact of  
aligning accreditation, performance, and quality 
management on hospital improvement: The case of  
Saudi Arabia (Doctoral dissertation, Brunel University 
London).  

Al Malkawie, D. (2020). Bank-specific and macroeconomic 
determinants of  Islamic banks’ profitability: The 
case of  GCC countries (Master’s thesis, The British 
University in Dubai).  

Ali, I., Aboelmaged, M., Govindan, K., & Malik, M. 
(2023). Understanding the key determinants of  IoT 
adoption for the digital transformation of  the food 
and beverage industry. Industrial Management & Data 
Systems.  

Alkhazaleh, A. M. K. (2021). Challenges and 
Opportunities for Fintech Startups: Situation in The 
Arab World. Academy of  Accounting and Financial Studies 
Journal, 25(3), 1-14.  

Allen, F. (2021). Globalization of  Finance and Fintech in the 
MENA Region.  

AlNasr, N. J. N. (2022). The Adoption of  Fintech: The 
Fintech Ecosystem in Qatar With a Comparison 

to Other Emerging Markets Hamad Bin Khalifa 
University (Qatar)].  

Bandyopadhyay, D., & Sen, J. (2011). Internet of  things: 
Applications and challenges in technology and 
standardization. Wireless Personal Communications, 58, 
49–69. 

Bohnert, A., Fritzsche, A., & Gregor, S. (2019). Digital 
agendas in the insurance industry: The importance of  
comprehensive approaches. The Geneva Papers on Risk 
and Insurance - Issues and Practice, 44, 1–19. 

Bohnsack, R., Bidmon, C. M., & Pinkse, J. (2022). 
Sustainability in the digital age: Intended and unintended 
consequences of  digital technologies for sustainable development. 
Wiley.  

Brenner, W., van Giffen, B., & Koehler, J. (2022). 
Management of  artificial intelligence: Feasibility, 
desirability, and viability. In Engineering the transformation 
of  the enterprise: A design science research perspective (pp. 
15–36). Springer.  

Cappiello, A., & Cappiello, A. (2018). Digital disruption 
and insurtech start-ups: Risks and challenges. In 
Technology and the insurance industry: Re-configuring the 
competitive landscape (pp. 29–50).  

Casula, M., Rangarajan, N., & Shields, P. (2021). The 
potential of  working hypotheses for deductive 
exploratory research. Quality & Quantity, 55(5), 1703-
1725.  

Cherqaoui, S. (2021). COVID-19–The Catalyst for Digital 
Transformation in Financial Services and Islamic 
FinTech: Evidence from Qatar. Financial Management, 
14(12), 602.  

Cherqaoui, S. (2022). Islamic finance growth as a catalyst for 
financial development (Doctoral dissertation, Hamad Bin 
Khalifa University, Qatar).  

Ching, K. H., Teoh, A. P., & Amran, A. (2020). A 
conceptual model of  technology factors to insurtech 
adoption by value chain activities. In 2020 IEEE 
Conference on e-Learning, e-Management and e-Services 
(IC3e)  

Dahdal, A., Truby, J., & Botosh, H. (2020). Trade finance 
in Qatar: Blockchain and economic diversification. 
Law and Financial Markets Review, 14(4), 223–236.  

Demeter, K., Losonci, D., Szalavetz, A., & Baksa, M. (2023). 
Strategic drivers behind the digital transformation of  
subsidiaries: a longitudinal approach. Post-Communist 
Economies, 35(7), 744-769.  

Doss, S. (2020). Digital disruption through data science: 
Embracing digital innovation in insurance business. 
Bimaquest, 20(3).  

Eckert, C., & Osterrieder, K. (2020). How digitalization 
affects insurance companies: Overview and use 
cases of  digital technologies. Zeitschrift für die gesamte 
Versicherungswissenschaft, 109, 333–360.  

El-Masri, M., Al-Yafi, K., & Samir Sherif, K. (2019). The 
digital transformation of  FinTech: Disruptions and 
value paths.  

Eling, M., & Lehmann, M. (2018). The impact of  
digitalization on the insurance value chain and the 



Pa
ge

 
55

https://journals.e-palli.com/home/index.php/ajfti

Am. J. Financ. Technol. Innov. 2(1) 44-56, 2024

insurability of  risks. The Geneva Papers on Risk and 
Insurance - Issues and Practice, 43, 359–396.  

Feghali, K., Matta, J., & Moussa, S. (2022). Digital 
transformation of  accounting practices and behavior 
during COVID-19: MENA evidence. Accounting and 
Management Information Systems, 21(2), 236-269.  

Ghosh, S., Hughes, M., Hodgkinson, I., & Hughes, P. 
(2022). Digital transformation of  industrial businesses: 
A dynamic capability approach. Technovation, 113, 
102414.  

Göll, E., & Zwiers, J. (2018). Technological trends in 
the MENA region: The cases of  digitalization and 
information and communications technology (ICT). 
In MENARA Istanbul.

Gopal, M., & Schnabl, P. (2022). The rise of  finance 
companies and fintech lenders in small business 
lending. The Review of  Financial Studies, 35(11), 4859–
4901.  

Grima, S., Spiteri, J., & Romānova, I. (2020). A STEEP 
framework analysis of  the key factors impacting 
the use of  blockchain technology in the insurance 
industry. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance-Issues 
and Practice, 45, 398-425.  

Halim, Z., Durya, N. P. M. A., Kraugusteeliana, K., 
Suherlan, S., & Alfisyahrin, A. L. (2023). Ethics-Based 
Leadership in Managing Information Security and 
Data Privacy. Jurnal Minfo Polgan, 12(2), 1819-1828.  

Hanafizadeh, P., & Amin, M. G. (2023). The 
transformative potential of  banking service domains 
with the emergence of  FinTechs. Journal of  Financial 
Services Marketing, 28(3), 411-447.  

Haron, A. (2016). E-commerce innovations and customer 
perceptions in Qatar. International Journal of  Economics 
and Management Sciences, 4, 310.  

Hassan, M. A., & Shukur, Z. (2019). Review of  digital 
wallet requirements. In 2019 International Conference on 
Cybersecurity (ICoCSec)  

Hub, Q. F. (2021). From Qatar to the world: A report on the 
state of  FinTech in Qatar (2021).  

Hujaimi, S. A.-Z., Khalaf, S. T., & Muslim, H. S. (2022). 
Smart insurance and the missing contribution to 
sustainable development in Iraq. Webology, 19(1), 
4213-4231.  

Ibrahim, H., Kamour, A. M., Harhara, T., Gaba, W. H., 
& Nair, S. C. (2020). Covid-19 pandemic research 
opportunity: Is the Middle East & North Africa 
(MENA) missing out? Contemporary clinical trials, 96, 
106106.  

Ibrahim, I., Antoine, & TrubyJon. (2021). Governance in 
the era of  Blockchain technology in Qatar: a roadmap 
and a manual for Trade Finance. Journal of  Banking 
Regulation, 1-20.  

Johnson, S. L., Gray, P., & Sarker, S. (2019). Revisiting IS 
research practice in the era of  big data. Information and 
Organization, 29(1), 41-56.  

KANG, E., & Hwang, H.-J. (2021). Ethical conducts 
in qualitative research methodology: Participant 
observation and interview process. Journal of  Research 

and Publication Ethics, 2(2), 5-10.  
Khan, S., Khan, H. U., & Nazir, S. (2023). Utilizing the 

collective wisdom of  fintech in the gcc region: A 
systematic mapping approach. Measurement and Control, 
56(3-4), 713-732.  

Kimberly, P., Grima, S., & Özen, E. (2022). Perceived 
Effectiveness of  Digital Transformation and 
InsurTech Use in Malta: A Study in the Context 
of  the European Union’s Green Deal. In Big Data: 
A Game Changer for Insurance Industry (pp. 239-263). 
Emerald Publishing Limited.  

Kimwaki, A. (2023). Non-financial factors affecting the 
performance of  life insurance companies in Kenya (Master’s 
thesis, Strathmore University).  

Kirkpatrick, S. I., Baranowski, T., Subar, A. F., Tooze, 
J. A., & Frongillo, E. A. (2019). Best practices for 
conducting and interpreting studies to validate self-
report dietary assessment methods. Journal of  the 
Academy of  Nutrition and Dietetics, 119(11), 1801-
1816.  

Knight, E., & Wójcik, D. (2018). Geographical linkages 
in the financial services industry: a dialogue with 
organizational studies. In Transitions in Regional 
Economic Development (pp. 204-226). Routledge.  

Kshetri, N. (2018). The economics of  cyber-insurance. IT 
Professional, 20(6), 9-14.  

Kumar, S., & Bhatia, M. S. (2021). Environmental 
dynamism, industry 4.0 and performance: Mediating 
role of  organizational and technological factors. 
Industrial Marketing Management, 95, 54–64.  

Lallie, H. S., Shepherd, L. A., Nurse, J. R., Erola, A., 
Epiphaniou, G., Maple, C., & Bellekens, X. (2021). 
Cybersecurity in the age of  COVID-19: A timeline 
and analysis of  cyber-crime and cyber-attacks during 
the pandemic. Computers & Security, 105, 102248.  

Lynn, T., Mooney, J. G., Rosati, P., & Cummins, M. (2019). 
Disrupting finance: FinTech and strategy in the 21st century. 
Springer Nature.  

Łyskawa, K., Kędra, A., Klapkiv, L., & Klapkiv, J. (2019). 
Digitalization in insurance companies. In International 
Scientific Conference: Contemporary Issues in Business, 
Management and Economics Engineering 

Manzoor, F., Wei, L., Bányai, T., Nurunnabi, M., & 
Subhan, Q. A. (2019). An examination of  sustainable 
HRM practices on job performance: An application 
of  training as a moderator. Sustainability, 11(8), 
2263.  

Maouchi, Y., Charfeddine, L., & El Montasser, G. (2022). 
Understanding digital bubbles amidst the COVID-19 
pandemic: Evidence from DeFi and NFTs. Finance 
Research Letters, 47, 102584.  

Muneeza, A., & Mustapha, Z. (2021). Islamic fintech and 
financial inclusion. Islamic FinTech: Insights and Solutions, 
173-190.  

Nayak, M., & Narayan, K. (2019). Strengths and 
weaknesses of  online surveys. Technology, 6(7), 0837–
2405053138.  

Nguyen, D. K., Sermpinis, G., & Stasinakis, C. (2023). 



Pa
ge

 
56

https://journals.e-palli.com/home/index.php/ajfti

Am. J. Financ. Technol. Innov. 2(1) 44-56, 2024

Big data, artificial intelligence and machine learning: 
A transformative symbiosis in favour of  financial 
technology. European Financial Management, 29(2), 517-
548.  

Nicoletti, B. (2020). Insurance 4.0: Benefits and challenges of  
digital transformation. Springer Nature.

Nicoletti, B., & Nicoletti, B. (2021). Future of  Insurance 
4.0 and Insurtech. In Insurance 4.0: Benefits and challenges 
of  digital transformation (pp. 389–431). Springer 
Nature.  

Njegomir, V., & Demko-Rihter, J. (2023). InsurTech: 
New Competition to Traditional Insurers and Impact 
on the Economic Growth. In Digital Transformation of  
the Financial Industry: Approaches and Applications (pp. 
133-150). Springer.  

Opportunities await: How InsurTech is reshaping 
insurance. (2016). Global Fintech Survey.  

Pant, S. K. (2020). Fintech: Emerging Trends. Telecom 
Business Review, 13(1).  

Park, H., & Kim, J. D. (2020). Transition towards green 
banking: role of  financial regulators and financial 
institutions. Asian Journal of  Sustainability and Social 
Responsibility, 5(1), 1-25.  

Pomazan, V., Tvoroshenko, I., & Gorokhovatskyi, V. 
(2023). Development of  an application for recognizing 
emotions using convolutional neural networks.  

Ramiah, V., Pereira, V., Dasgupta, B., Frino, A., & Pham, 
H. (2023). Banking and Financial Institutions in the 
Gulf  Cooperation Council Region. Doing Business in 
the Middle East: A Research-Based Practitioners’ Guide.  

Rodríguez-Espíndola, O., Chowdhury, S., Dey, P. K., 
Albores, P., & Emrouznejad, A. (2022). Analysis 
of  the adoption of  emergent technologies for risk 
management in the era of  digital manufacturing. 
Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 178, 
121562.  

Sadigov, S., Vasylieva, T. A., & Rubanov, P. M. (2020). 
Fintech in economic growth: Cross-country analysis. 
Varazdin Development and Entrepreneurship Agency; 
University North.

Schilling, M. A. (2013). Strategic management of  technological 
innovation (4th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.  

Sharar, D. Z., & Earley, M. (2018). The Qatar International 
Court: Judicial updates. LEXIS NEXIS/The MENA 
Business Law Review.

Skoric, M. M., Tse, C. H., Kasadha, J., & Jeremy, P. (2022). 

Fintech, data, innovation and privacy in Hong Kong. 
Sreedharan V, R., & Saha, R. (2021). An integrated 

framework for service quality, choice overload, 
customer involvement and satisfaction: Evidence 
from India’s non-life insurance sector. Management 
decision, 59(4), 801-828.  

Statista. (2023). Forecast of  the global insurance market 
2028. Statista. https://www.statista.com/
statistics/1192960/forecast-global-insurance-
market/  

Svetlana, V. (2016). InsurTech: Challeges and 
development perspectives. International Journal of  
Innovative Technologies in Economy, 3(5), 39-42.  

Tohang, V., Ramadhan, A. S., & Djajadiningrat, V. (2021). 
An empirical study on customer acceptance of  
FinTech 3.0 in private banking. In 2021 International 
Conference on Information Management and Technology 
(ICIMTech).

Tripathy, A. (2020). COVID-19 triggers a paradigm shift 
in technology for the insurance industry.  

Ullah, F., Qayyum, S., Thaheem, M. J., Al-Turjman, 
F., & Sepasgozar, S. M. (2021). Risk management 
in sustainable smart cities governance: A TOE 
framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 
167, 120743.  

Villegas-Mateos, A. (2022). Toward a Sustainable 
Entrepreneurial Ecosystem in Qatar. Sustainability, 
15(1), 127.  

Wang, L. L., & Gao, Y. (2021). Competition network 
as a source of  competitive advantage: The dynamic 
capability perspective and evidence from China. Long 
Range Planning, 54(2), 102052.  

Wiegard, R.-B., & Breitner, M. H. (2019). Smart services 
in healthcare: A risk-benefit-analysis of  pay-as-you-
live services from customer perspective in Germany. 
Electronic Markets, 29, 107-123.  

Wilson, S. (2020). The pandemic, the acceleration of  
digital transformation and the impact on cyber 
security. Computer Fraud & Security, 2020(12), 13–15.  

Xu, X., & Zweifel, P. (2020). A framework for the 
evaluation of  InsurTech. Risk Management and Insurance 
Review, 23(4), 305-329.  

Zahra, S. A. (2021). The resource-based view, 
resourcefulness, and resource management in 
startup firms: A proposed research agenda. Journal of  
Management, 47(7), 1841-1860.


