Book Reviews 125 

Book Review 

Sociology in Iran 

By Ali Akbar Mahdi and Abdolali Lahsaeizadeh. Bethesda, 
MD: Jahan Book Co., 1992, 141 pp. 

The book, with the help of empirical data, provides valuable information 
about the development of sociology as a discipline in Iran. It explains how 
the discipline was introduced in one of the colleges of Tehran in 1946 and 
gradually, over a span of twenty-five years, became a popular subject of 
teaching and research. The number of qualified students and staff is also 
steadily increasing. But more importantly, Iran now has a unifonn B.A. 
degree program consisting of 144 credit hours in eight 17-week semesters. 
Five categories of courses related to different areas and subareas are provided: 
general, base, main, elective, and specialized courses. In all of these courses, 
sociology and its various branches are mentioned. 

The M.A. degree program has been developed with the intention of pre­
paring a competent cadre of future teachers for the higher centers of learning. 
The program is similar to that found in European and American universities, 
with the exception of courses on the social thought of Muslim thinkers and 
the social ideas of Muslim philosophers, theologians, intellectuals, and his­
torians. A doctoral program has also been introduced for training university 
faculty and researchers. The program requires thirty credit hours over a period 
of seven semesters. Out of these credit hours, twenty-two are required courses 



126 The American Journal of Islamic Social Sciences 101 

and the remaining are electives. One survey lists thirty-two nxearch institu- 
tions, working under government agencies and various universities, that are 
actively engaged in studying various issues. Efforts have also been made to 
prepaw sociological literature to cater to the needs of students and re- 
searchers. According to one estimate, up until 1989 (i.e., both before and after 
the revolution), a total of 521 books of sociology had been translated and 
975 books had been written. 

One significant fact that is discussed in the book is the indigenization of 
sociology. The authors describe two aspects of the development of Iranian 
sociology: prerevolutionary and postrevolutionary. The first period is marked 
by three major trends: conventional, radical, and synthesized which, in one 
way or the other, are manifestations of Western intellectual ethos and its in- 
terpretation in the Iranian situation. They explained social phenomena from 
a Western viewpoint. The second period, however, brought about drastic 
change in the sociopolitical scene and influenced the minds and souls of 
people in general and of the educated in particular. Sociologists, influenced 
by these developments, found new strength and revitalized the efforts to in- 
digenize the discipline. They felt a strong need to reshape and restructure 
sociology’s conceptual and theoretical bases according to Imn’s sociocultural 
ethos, value system, normative perspective, and worldview. 

The process of indigenization was initiated in the prerevolutionary period 
by social scientists such as Al-i Ahmad who found Western perspectives and 
parameters to be inadequate and irrelevant to acquiring an understanding and 
then explaining the social realities of Third World societies. It was strength- 
ened and revitalized after the revolution by the patronage of a political elite 
committed to the Islamization of Iranian society. Indigenous social thinkers 
began to think anew and tried to develop models and paradigms according to 
the ideological framework of Islam. They found that any knowledge meaning- 
fully associated with the normative system, particularly in the case of the 
human and the social worlds, should be in consonance with the basic tenets 
of revealed knowledge, which constitutes an alternative ideological system. 

This intellectual effort led to the emergence of Islamic sociology. Shariati, 
the first to use this phrase in Iran, made rigorous effort to Islamize socio- 
logical knowledge. Social scientists in Iran found basic differences between 
Islamic and Western social thought. They thus demarcated the two views. 
Zarshanas and Surush are among the more prominent sociologists. Iranian 
sociologists have tried to define, explain, and elaborate Islamic sociology and 
concepts of sociological importance. Remarkably, three approaches to Islamic 
sociology have been developed. The first is the reconstructionist approach, 
which treats sociology as ”the science dealing with the laws of social life of 
humans . . . .” The second is Feqahati’s “New Sociology,” which is explained 
as the knowledge of society and its variables when under the control of the 
viluyet-e fuqih. The third stresses the study of classical and contemporary Is- 



Book Reviews 127 

lamic scholars. It highlights the issues with which they dealt, because later on, 
such issues became the subject matter of Western social thinking. 

The themes discussed above clearly indicate that Iranian sociologists have 
struggled to develop indigenous sociological thought in order to understand 
social issues and analyze human actions in their own sociocultural setting. 
They, of course, deserve praise for not blindly following the footsteps of 
Western sociologists and interpreting social realities in terms of Western ex- 
perience. The book, in this respect, is very significant, for it narrates the 
tedious journey that Iranian scholars have undertaken for intellectual trans- 
formation. It will be of great utility for social scientists and teseatchets of 
Third World countries who should learn from the Iranian experience and 
repeat it in their own region. 

Jamil FarooqUi 
Department of Sociology and Anthropology 

International Islamic University 
Selangor, Malaysia 

n 
RcMit a d s  i&e: 

Andrew Linklater The Question of the Next Stage in 
International Relotions Theory: 
A Critical Theory Point of Vim 

Once Again Into the Fray: International 
Relations ConJironts the Humanities 

British Sovereignly and the EC: What 
is the Risk? 

Sovereignty a t  Bay: Twenty Years AftU 

Global Environmental Change a n d  
Inkrnational Governance 

Pauline Rosenau 

Paul Taylor 

Raymond Vernon 

Oran R. Young 

MILLENfflUM offers an extensive Book Reviews section 
in each issue and regular Discussion and Review sections. 

PECIAL ISSUE 

suli*criptions: 

Individuals €16.00 per annum ( U S  $26.00: Canada $30.00) 
Institutions €35.00 (US $56.00: Canada $67.00) 1 Students flyou/ (US $16.00: Canada $20.00)