Pa ge 1 Pa ge 70 American Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Innovation (AJMRI) An Empirical Study on the Social Intelligence of Student Teachers Among the Tribal Community Malsawmtluangi Vanchhawng1*, Lalhriatpuii1, Susan Lalthanpuii2, Lynda Vanlalruati3, Lalhruaitluangi Sailo3, Reuben Lalchuangkima4 Volume 2 Issue 5, Year 2023 ISSN: 2158-8155 (Online), 2832-4854 (Print) DOI: https://doi.org/10.54536/ajmri.v2i5.2023 https://journals.e-palli.com/home/index.php/ajmri Article Information ABSTRACT Received: August 25, 2023 Accepted: September 27, 2023 Published: October 06, 2023 The present study analysed the detailed dimensions of social intelligence of student teachers among tribal community in the northeast part of India. 451 (175 males and 276 females) were selected randomly as sample from the teacher training institutes in Mizoram. The research findings revealed that the student teachers of Mizoram had above average level of social intelligence and there was no significant difference in terms of gender. The findings of the present study revealed that there were no significant difference between male and female on their level of patience, co-cooperativeness, confidence and sensitivity, recognition of social environment, tactfulness and memory. The research findings also revealed that there was significant difference between male and female student teachers on their sense of humour, female student teachers showed higher level in their sense of humour as compared to the male student teachers. Keywords Gender, Mizoram, Social Intelligence, Student Teacher INTRODUCTION In the current era characterized by social confrontations by the withdrawal of social norms, it is difficult to lead a successful life in a society without social intelligence. Everyone needs intelligence in general and social intelligence in particular to survive. Only high I.Q level is not enough to make a man perfect for the society. According to Thorndike (1920), Social intelligence is the ability to understand others and act wisely in human relations. An aspect of a person’s mental capacity that allows for social adaptation is referred to as social intelligence. Social intelligence is crucial for teachers to connect with students in an efficient manner and to comprehend pupils in the classroom, in along with their social environment. The success of the students is significantly impacted by the professional and interpersonal skills of the teachers. Teacher who have strong interpersonal skills, verbal and non-verbal communication skills, empathy, problem solving skills, giving and receiving constructive feedback, reading social cues, understanding humour, active listening, assertiveness, deal effectively with conflict, co- operation and collaboration skills enables meaningful cooperation among students. Educators with high levels of social intelligence are able to mould individuals from different age groups to lead a wholesome life. A detailed analysis of various studies reveals the fact that research in the area of descriptive research in social intelligence has been conducted by many researchers worldwide. However, descriptive research to study the social intelligence of the teacher trainees among the tribal community has been largely unexplored. Especially, such a kind of study has not been taken up so far. The results from this study will, it is anticipated, offer further inputs to higher education institutions regarding the development and implementation of pre-service and in-service teacher training programs in Mizoram. LITERATURE REVIEW Jeloudar and Yunus (2011) explored social intelligence level among teachers in government secondary schools in Malaysia in light of some demographic variables and to know the correlation between teachers and classroom control strategies social intelligence. Their study results showed that teacher in government secondary schools had moderate level of social intelligence. Their study also showed that with the increase of teacher’s age in government secondary schools, their level of social intelligence also increases. Jeloudar et al. (2012) examined the influenced of social intelligence of secondary school teachers from India, Malaysia and China on classroom discipline strategies. The result of the study showed that school teachers from India, Malaysia and China had moderate level of social intelligence. Statistical analysis showed that there was a significant difference in their level of social intelligence among teachers from India, Malaysia and China, a comparison of their mean scores indicated that India had higher level of social intelligence as compared to Malaysia and China; Malaysia had higher level of social intelligence as compared to China. Arthi and Tamilselvi (2016) studied the social intelligence of B. Ed student teachers in Namakkal district. The sample consisted of 724 B.Ed. student teachers from ten Colleges of Namakkal District selected by random 1 Department of Education, Mizoram University, Mizoram, India 2 Department of Education, Pachhunga University College, Mizoram, India 3 Department of Education, Hrangbana College, Mizoram, India 4 Department of Education, Kawnpui College, Mizoram, India * Corresponding author’s e-mail: atei123@yahoo.com Pa ge 71 https://journals.e-palli.com/home/index.php/ajmri Am. J. Multidis. Res. Innov. 2(5) 70-75, 2023 sampling technique. The findings of the study revealed that there was no significant difference in the level of social intelligence of B.Ed. student teachers based on gender. There was significant difference in the level of social intelligence of B.Ed. student teachers based on locality. A comparison of their mean scores showed that the mean score of B. Ed student teachers belonging to urban area had higher mean score as compare to B. Ed student teachers belonging to rural area. Anbalgan and Kasirajan (2020) studied the relationship between social intelligence and social media among 300 student teachers from different B. Ed college from Tirunelveli district in Tamil Nadu. The result of their study revealed that 15.7% of student teachers had low level of social intelligence, 69% of student teachers had moderate level of social intelligence and 15.3% of student teachers had high level of social intelligence. The result also showed that there was no significant relationship between the level of social intelligence and competencies of social media of student teachers. Objectives of the Study 1. To find out the levels of social intelligence of student teachers among tribal community in Mizoram. 2. To find out the difference between male and female on the level of social intelligence among student teachers of tribal community in Mizoram. 3. To find out gender difference on the eight dimensions of social intelligence of student teachers among tribal community in Mizoram. Hypotheses 1. There is no significant difference in the level of social intelligence between male and female student teachers among tribal community in Mizoram. 2. There is no significant difference between male and female student teachers among tribal community in Mizoram on the eight dimensions of social intelligence. METHODOLOGY The present study is descriptive in nature. Primary data was used to assess social intelligence of student teachers of Mizoram. For the present study, student teachers of the academic year 2020- 2022 from Mizoram constituted the population. The sample of the study consisted of 451 (175 male and 276 females) pre-service B. Ed students were selected using stratified random sampling technique. In order to find out the level of Social Intelligence of student teachers of Mizoram, the investigator used Social Intelligence Scale (2013) standardized by N. K. Chadha and Usha Ganesan, published by National Psychological Corporation, Agra 1971.The scores of each individual were interpreted by using the following table (Table 1). Hence, for interpreting for the response, the score of each individual respondent were calculated and interpretation was made as per the z-score norms given in the Social Intelligence Scale. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Objectives No. 1: Level of Social Intelligence of Student Teachers among Tribal Community in Mizoram To find out the level of social intelligence of student teachers among tribal community in Mizoram the investigator made use of Social Intelligence scale developed by N. K. Chadha and Ms. Usha Ganesan. The scores of each individual student teacher were calculated and interpretation was made as per the z-score norms given in the Social Intelligence scale. The research findings of the overall mean, standard deviation and detailed classification into different categories of the student teachers are reflected in Table 2 and Table 3. Table 1: z- Score Norms for Interpretation of the level of Social Intelligence Range of Z score Level of social Intelligence +2.01 and above Extremely high +1.26 to2.00 High +0.51 to + 1.25 Above Average -0.50 to +0.50 Average -1.25 to -0.51 Below Average -2.00 to -1.26 Low -2.01 and below Extremely Low Table 2: Overall mean of social intelligence of student teachers among tribal community in Mizoram Parameter N Mean Std. Deviation Social Intelligence 451 102.79 9.05 It is perceptible from Table 2 that the mean score and standard deviation of the level of social intelligence of 451 student teachers among tribal community in Mizoram were found to be 102.79 and 9.04 respectively. Therefore, it may be inferred that student teachers of Mizoram were having above average level of social intelligence. The research findings that student teachers were having above average level of social intelligence might be because even from the early time, the Mizos were renowned for having an extremely close-knit society and a close-knit community life. They demonstrate solid communal bonds and a way of life that is typical of tribal culture. This culture still prevails in the present day to day activities through out Mizoram, and this helps in achieving positive results as a group in any stream including teacher trainees. Young boys had to undergo rather strict training and discipline at home and in the local community through the institution of the ‘Zawlbuk’ which served as a learning centre for young men, despite the fact that there was no formal education provided and there were no schools in existence during that time. For the purpose of instilling moral ethics based on tlawmngaihna (a term used to express the selfless service to others even at the cost of Pa ge 72 https://journals.e-palli.com/home/index.php/ajmri Am. J. Multidis. Res. Innov. 2(5) 70-75, 2023 student teachers falling on the extremely low level of social intelligence. Objective No. 2: Difference Between Male and Female on the Level of Social Intelligence among Student Teachers of Tribal Community in Mizoram To find out the level of social intelligence between male and female student teachers in Mizoram, descriptive statistics such as mean, standard deviation and t-test were used and the detailed study of the results are reflected in Table 4. one’s own sacrifice), the scope of activities engaged in, and the level of discipline upheld in the ‘Zawlbuk’ were all extremely stringent. As shown in Table 3, out of 451 student teachers, 9(1.99%) student teachers were having extremely high level of social intelligence, 22(4.88%) student teachers were having high level of social intelligence, 128 (28.38%) student teachers were having above average level of social intelligence, 161 (35.69%) student teachers were having average level of social intelligence, 80 (17.74%) were having low level of social intelligence and 16 (3.55%) Table 3: Overall level of social intelligence of student teachers in Mizoram Range of z-Score Range of actual score Level of social Intelligence f +2.01 and above 120 and above Extremely High 9 (1.99%) +1.26 to 2.00 109 – 119 High 22 (4.88%) +0.51 to + 1.25 98 – 108 Above Average 128 (28.38%) -0.50 to +0.50 82 - 97 Average 161 (35.69%) -1.25 to -0.51 71 - 81 Below Average 80 (17.74%) -2.00 to -1.26 60 – 70 Low 35 (7.76%) -2.01 and below 59 and below Extremely Low 16 (3.55%) Table 4: Overall mean of social intelligence of student teachers in Mizoram – gender wise Gender N Mean Std. Deviation SEM Male 175 101.81 9.69 0.73 Female 276 103.41 8.57 0.51 It is clearly seen from Table 4, the mean score and standard deviation of the level of social intelligence of male student teachers were found to be 101.81 and 9.69 respectively. Similarly, the mean score and standard deviation of the level of social intelligence of female student teachers were found to be 103.41 and 8.57 respectively. Therefore, it may be inferred that male and female student teachers among tribal community in Mizoram had average level of social intelligence. Although male and female student teachers fall on the same levels of social intelligence, a comparison of their mean scores revealed that the mean scores of male student teachers was slightly higher as compared to female student teachers but not statistically significant. The finding of the present study conducted in Mizoram can be further assimilated with the findings conducted by some studies which showed no significant differences between male and female student teachers in their level of social intelligence (Barbera et al. 2003, Gnanadevan 2007, Dixit & Kaur 2015, Rani 2016, Tiakala2016, Arthi & Tamilselvi 2016, Rani & Shaili 2017, Kharluni & Erigala 2018, Bhattacharyya & Sanghamitra 2018, Asghar et al. 2019, Jasleen et al. 2021, Kaur et al. 2021). Notwithstanding the findings of the present study, Uygun et al. (2020) in Turkey found that female pre-service teachers had higher level of social intelligence as compare to male pre-service teachers. Kamil and Bilal (2020) in Turkey found that the level of social intelligence of female pre-service social science teachers were higher as compare to male pre- service social science teachers. Detailed gender wise analyses of student teachers among tribal community in Mizoram falling on the different categories of social intelligence are shown in Table 5. Table 5 reflect the detailed analysis of the levels of social intelligence of student teachers in Mizoram – gender wise. Out of 175 male student teachers, 3 (1.71%) were having extremely high level of social intelligence, 6 (3.43%) student teachers were having high level of social intelligence. Out of 175 male student teachers 58 (33.14%) of male student teachers were having above average level of social intelligence, around one-fourth, 48 (27.43%) male student teachers were having average level of social intelligence and 32 (18.29%) male student Table 5: Overall levels of social intelligence of student teachers among tribal community in Mizoram – gender wise Gender N Extremely high High Above Average Average Below Average Low Extremely low Male 175 3 (1.71%) 6 (3.43%) 58 (33.14%) 48 (27.43%) 32 (18.29%) 22 (12.57%) 6 (3.43%) Female 276 6 (2.17%) 16 (5.79%) 70 (25.36%) 113 (40.94%) 48 (17.39%) 13 (4.71%) 10 (3.62%) Pa ge 73 https://journals.e-palli.com/home/index.php/ajmri Am. J. Multidis. Res. Innov. 2(5) 70-75, 2023 teachers were having below average level of social intelligence. 22 (12.57%) male student teachers were having low level of social intelligence and only 6 (3.43%) male student teachers were having extremely low level of social intelligence. Out of 276 female student teachers, 6 (2.17%) were having extremely high level of social intelligence and 16 (5.79%) student teachers were having high level of social intelligence. Out of 276 female student teachers, one-fourth of female student teachers 70 (25.36%) were having above average level of social intelligence, 113 (40.94%) of female student teachers were having average level of social intelligence, 48 (17.39%) of female student teachers were having below average level of social intelligence and 13 (4.71%) of female student teachers were having low level of social intelligence and 10 (3.62%) of female student teachers were having extremely low level of social intelligence. Difference in the Levels of Social Intelligence between Male and Female Student Teachers among the Tribal Community in Mizoram To find out the significant differences between male and female student teachers on their level of social intelligence, a hypothesis was framed and inferential statistic such as t-test was employed. Hypothesis 1 states that ‘There is no significant difference in the levels of social intelligence between male and female student teachers of Mizoram.’ Hypothesis 1 states that, ‘There is no significant difference among the social intelligence of student teachers among tribal community in Mizoram with reference to their gender.’ Table 6: Comparison of the levels of social intelligence between male and female student teachers among tribal community in Mizoram Gender N Mean Std. Deviation SEM df t-value Significant Level Male 175 101.81 9.69 0.73 449 1.78 NS Female 276 103.41 8.58 0.51 As shown in Table 6, the t-value for the significance of difference in the levels of social intelligence between male and female B. Ed students of Mizoram was found to be 1.78. Therefore, the hypothesis which was framed ‘There is no significant difference in the levels of social intelligence between male and female student teachers among the tribal community in Mizoram’ was accepted. Considering their mean score, a slight difference was found favouring female student teachers but not statistically significant. Objective No. 3: Detailed Study of Gender Difference on the Eight Dimensions of Social Intelligence of Student Teachers among Tribal Community in Mizoram An attempt was made to show the significant difference between male and female student teachers on the eight dimensions of social intelligence scale. The social intelligence scale was divided into five parts; the first part contains 36 questions to evaluate patience (8 questions), co-cooperativeness (11 questions), confidence (8 questions) and sensitivity (9 questions). The second part contains 3 questions to check recognition of social environment. The third part contains 7 questions to evaluate tactfulness. The fourth part contains 8 questions to evaluate sense of humour. The fifth part contains 12 pictures to check memory. The mean scores, standard deviation and t-value were calculated using descriptive statistics (Table 7). As indicated in Table 7, the t –value for the significant difference between male and female student teachers on their level of patience, co-cooperativeness, confidence and sensitivity was 0.06 which means there was no significant difference between male and female student teachers in their level of patience, co-cooperativeness, confidence and sensitivity. The t-value for the significant difference between male and female student teachers on their level of recognition of social environment was 0.39 which means there was no significant difference between male and female student teachers in their level of recognition of social environment. The t-value for the significant difference between male and female student teachers in their level of tactfulness was 0.60 which means there was no significant difference between male and female student teachers in their level of tactfulness. The t-value for the significant difference between male and female student teachers in their sense of humour was 3.90 which means there is a significant difference between male and female student teachers in their sense of humour. A comparison of their mean scores showed that female student teachers had higher mean score as compared to male student teachers which means that female student teachers had higher level of sense of humour. The t-value for the significant difference between male and female student teachers on their level of memory was 1.39 that showed us there is no significant difference between male and female student teachers on their level of memory. Similar study conducted by Arthi and Tamilselvi (2016) in Tamil Nadu found that there were no significant difference between male and female B. Ed student teachers in the social intelligence dimensions of co- cooperativeness, confidence, sensitivity, recognition of social environment, tactfulness, sense of humour and memory. The findings of their study also found that there was significant difference between male and female Pa ge 74 https://journals.e-palli.com/home/index.php/ajmri Am. J. Multidis. Res. Innov. 2(5) 70-75, 2023 B. Ed student teachers in the patience dimension, female student teachers had higher level of patience as compared to male B. Ed student teachers. Kaur et al. (2021) in Punjab found that there were no significant difference between male and female teacher trainees in their level of patience, confidence, sensitivity and tactfulness. The findings of their study found that there were significant difference between male and female teacher trainees in their cooperativeness, recognition of social environment, sense of humour and memory; male teacher trainees had higher level of memory, sense of humour and recognition of social environment as compared to female teacher trainees. The result of their study also revealed that female teacher trainees showed higher level in the dimension of cooperativeness. CONCLUSION The finding of the research study revealed that the student teachers of Mizoram had above average level of social intelligence. The people living of Mizoram were very closely knit society and led a close community life where an individual has an ample of opportunities to develop effective communication skills, interpersonal relationship, sympathy, empathy, cooperation and collaboration, assertiveness and problem solving skills. The present study also revealed that there was no significant difference between male and female student teachers of Mizoram in their social intelligence. There can be many possible reasons, Mizo society where women education have taken a backseat for so long are now given equal opportunity to female to learn and to grow side by side in the institutions; male and female co-operate, work together and mingle responsibly with one another. Both men and women had equitable access to opportunities in community, in social pursuits, and in the workplace. The findings of the present study also revealed that there were no significant difference between male and female in their level of patience, co-cooperativeness, confidence and sensitivity, recognition of social environment, tactfulness and memory. The research study also revealed that there is a significant difference between male and female student teachers in their sense of humour, female student teachers showed higher level in their sense of humour as compared to male student teachers. REFERENCES Anbalgan, S. & Kasirajan, V. (2020). Relationship between social intelligence and social media among student teachers. i-manager’s Journal on Humanities & Social Science, 2(1), 1-6. Arthi, S. & Tamilselvi, B. (2016). A study of social intelligence of B.Ed. student teachers in Namakkal district. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development, 3(9), 322-326. Asghar, A., Iqbal, A., & Adnan, K. (2019). Gender, age and locality based social intelligence differences of B. Ed. (Hons) students. Global Social Sciences Review, 4(1), 145-149. Barbera, K. L., Charoenchote, W., & Barchard, K. A. (2003). Relating emotional and social intelligence to sex and age. [Annual Meeting]. Nevada State Psychological Association, Las Vegas, 89154-5030. Bhattacharyya, S. & Sanghamitra, G., G. (2018). A relationship study on social intelligence and teachers’ behaviour in classroom. Online journal of Multidisplinary Subjects (Peer reviewed), 12(2), 285-290. Gnanadevan, R. (2007). Social intelligence of higher secondary students in relation to their social- economic status. Journal of Community Guidance and Research, 24(3) 340-346. Jasleen, K. and Mamta, R., & Rajesh, K. (2021). A study of social intelligence among prospective teachers of Punjab. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry.12(6), 8301- 8306. Jeloudar, y. S., Yunus, S. A., Roslan S, Sharifah, M., N. (2012). The influence of social intelligence of secondary school teachers on classroom discipline strategies. Journal of Psychology, 3(1), 39-45. Jeloudar, S., & Yunus, A. (2011). Exploring the Relationship between Teachers Social Intelligence and Table 7: Gender difference of student teachers among the tribal community of Mizoram on the eight dimensions of social intelligence scale Dimensions Gender N Mean Std. Deviation SEM t-value p-value Level of Significance Part 1 Patience, Co-cooperativeness, Confidence & Sensitivity Male 175 83.87 9.89 .74 .06 .95 NS Female 276 83.81 9.78 .59 Part II Recognition of Social Environment Male 175 1.64 .85 .06 .39 .70 NS Female 276 1.61 .98 .05 Part III Tactfulness Male 175 3.99 1.24 .09 .60 .54 NS Female 276 4.07 1.19 .07 Part IV Sense of Humour Male 175 3.18 1.49 .11 3.90 .00 S Female 276 3.72 1.48 .09 Part V Memory Male 175 7.78 2.75 .20 1.39 .17 NS Female 276 8.13 2.73 .16 Pa ge 75 https://journals.e-palli.com/home/index.php/ajmri Am. J. Multidis. Res. Innov. 2(5) 70-75, 2023 Classroom Discipline Strategies. International Journal of Psychological Studies, 3(2), 149- 155. Kamil, U. & Bilal, B. A. (2020).Examining the relationship between social intelligence levels and communication skills of prospective social studies teachers. Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 15(1), 232-252. Kaur, J., Roy., M & Kumar, R. (2021). A study of social intelligence among prospective teachers of Punjab. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 12(6), 8301- 8306. Kharluni, L. & Erigala, K., A (2018). Social intelligence and social competence of higher secondary students of Mylliem block in east Khasi hills district of Meghalaya. International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts, 6(2), 1378-1384. Rani, R. & Shaili. (2017). Study the relationship between social intelligence and adjustment among under graduate students. International Journal for Innovative Research in Multidisciplinary Field, 3(9), 56-58. Rani, P. (2016). Social intelligence of B.Ed. students in relation to their gender and locality. Scholarly Research Journal for Humanity Science & English Language, 6(26), 7732-7736. Tiakala. (2016). A study of the relationship of social intelligence with personality traits and life skills of the higher secondary school students of Nagaland. [Unpublished Ph. D. Thesis] Jamia Millia Islamia University, New Delhi. Uygan, Arbibas & Bilal, B. (2020). Examining the relationship between social intelligence levels and communication skills of prospective social studies teachers. Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 15(1), 232-252.