American Journal of Research in Humanities and Social Sciences ISSN (E): 2832-8019 Volume 29, | October - 2024 P a g e | 115 www.americanjournal.org PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF THE FORMATION OF MORAL CONSCIOUSNESS IN STUDENTS Akramov Mirmuxsin Rustamovich, Associate Professor of the Department of "Psychology and Pedagogy of Religion" of the International Islamic Academy of Uzbekistan, Doctor of Psychology A B S T R A C T K E Y W O R D S In the article there is considered the issue of moral ideas of students during their study in higher education institution. Behaviour, moral consciousness, moral problems, moral scales, discriminant, analyses. Introduction All changes being happened in the Republic of Uzbekistan were directed to provide with developing social and economic steadiness of our country, people’s spirituality soon, that is to say, the increasing of consumerists’ mood is being observed in society. At that time the attention to the natural attitude to the matter which surrounds with people turned to the attention center of the public. Behavior (Arabian “the great number of people’s words”) is the totality of regulating relations among the people. In the behavior “kindness” and “good customs” give a chance to adapt people’s blessing to the society’s blessing, sometimes to change their living aims and boons for society’s blessing [2,36]. After Uzbekistan had achieved independence, it began to pay attention to the moral problems. Within people’s relations and mutual treatment forgettable religious customs in oriental style behavior, traditions, ceremonies are being restored. Behavior depends on people’s freedom and creation. Person chooses, assimilates, adapts and develops moral customs and traditions in society. Moral appraising is supported by the public opinion. Behavior finds expression in the criterion of people’s character, the relations which its responsibility concerning to society and all beings. The people’s attitude to nature wasn’t assessed according to the moral point of view, their condition wasn’t learnt in connection with the people’s character, because people were subordinated to nature formerly and they were protected by its influence. People took necessary things for themselves from nature. The nature of history was invented by the nature of people. So, nature changed the object of people’s relations which demands of economic materials for satisfying people’s requirements. This condition gives a chance to talk about people’s moral and moral contrary relations to nature and behavior surrounds ecologic departures The development of people’s responsible relation to nature consists of the main content ant subject of ecologic component in moral behavior. We decided to use the methods concerning to learning moral problems because the relations may be defined by problems. This method was examined by I.G.Dubov and A.A.Xvostov. It gives a chance American Journal of Research in Humanities and Social Sciences Volume 29 October - 2024 P a g e | 116 www.americanjournal.org to learn the moral manners of determinants which are in the large groups of life consciousness [4,49]. But we came across some problems in the process of adaptation of method. The main problem includes the differences between Uzbek and Russian people’s imagination about behavior. That is to say, it depends on mental peculiarities. In the method which was examined by authors 54 notes concerning to the moral determinants were reflected 16 factors. But we generated 17 factors with to poles, not 16 factors when we was analyzed the taken information in the process of pilotage research, such kinds of position the keys of original analyses which were given by the creator of method may be noted to having come across transformation in our national environment. B.M.Botirov says that this event may be defined with Uzbek people’s cognitive difficulty. That is to say, analyzing this method by itself causes of contently mistaking. We decided to recycle 54 notes according to the method of discriminant analysis. Discriminant analysis helps to solve the problems bearing on two kinds of groups: 1.Making interpretation opinions among different classes answers the questions:how exact to be different from the group of mutabilitiy in using condition which group was given by other group:which of this mutability to became clear importance to distinguish. 2.In the classification of objects that is to say every special object to define which depends on the groups in coming conditions from the value of discriminant changes. We chose the courses which this students were studying in the capacity of nominative variance of the discriminative analyses(1,2,3,4 courses ) . In the view of this, each of 54 emphasis were looked through as the special scale. The emphasis which depends on the first canonical factor was consisted of the fallowings (the tasks of factor are counted beginning from the top). In positive pole; “because you needn’t feel mental anguish for your fault” (0,918), “because it depends on your position in society” (0,521). In negative pole; “because if all people are well-bred, people won’t have place for evil harm” (-0,505). The special analysis of these foctors show that students have external circumstances; if you try within sphere of behaviour ,it won’t be damaged to your position in society and subsequently you needn’t feel mental anguish. But it should be noted that the negative pole of factor shows that people may use moral conduct for the purpose of harm. Behviour is for being agreement to life there won’t be place for evil harm,although all people try on the sphere of behaviour. We called this factor; “behaviour is in the capacity of introyect”. The emphasis which depends on the second factor consists of the fallowing. The functions concerning to the centre of the groups: Courses Functions 1 2 3 1-course -1,007 -0,180 0.121 2-course 0,905 -,0422 0,183 3-course 0,284 0,906 0,258 4-course 0,147 0,097 -0,954 American Journal of Research in Humanities and Social Sciences Volume 29 October - 2024 P a g e | 117 www.americanjournal.org We think that this situation may be defined with students’moving to other environment which differ from cultural environment with students’moving (family, school, academic lyceum and collage) and their desire is being passed from this environment.This situation means being happened heavy students’ process of cordination to new life. Because students approached balanced point of the factor at three and four courses (according to condition 0,284 and 0,147). We are witness that students’imagination about behaviour which are at two and three courses came across transformation sharply; they were near negative pole of the second factor at the second course but their idea approached positive pole of this factor at the third cource.That is to say they thought when they were studying at the second course; If everybody undertakes according to the position in society, they won’t be place for evil harm in his life. But they changed their idea at the third course. Person may demonstrate relations with other poeople “appreciating” or estimated for striving define blessing at the third course. Students came to the conclusion;if behavior is appreciating the relations with other people, it is useless respecting such relations. According to the fallowing factors students’ may be devided into estates; Students are called “in horror” at first course, “being adapted” at the third course, “became cultured” at the fourt course. In the content analysis of the third factor behavior consists of good deed,it is human duty, so, it means that observing the behavior is wise work. As a matter of fact, the negative pole of the factor takes up different respect from the former two factors of the falloving factor; “Behavior is wise work,that’s why it admits that it doe not influence the being relations with other peoples”. We called the third factor conditionally “Behavior is as an individual responsibilty criterion”. If discriminant analysis takes into consideration to carry out deserving the classification of certain nominativ value, we shall observe what to be reflected the imagination as regards moral determinant within courses. The analysis results are reflekted on the following table. At first course the canonic discriminant function of students were near the negative pole of the first factor but they changed their idea completely and moved to positive pole if the following factor (0,905) at second course. That’s to say, they thought when they were studying at the first course if you tried in Course Functions 1 -1,007 Functions 2 -0,18 Functions 3 0.121 American Journal of Research in Humanities and Social Sciences Volume 29 October - 2024 P a g e | 118 www.americanjournal.org the sphere of behavior, it would not be damaged to your postion in society and subsequently you would not have been felt mental anguish but thay subsenbed this idea at second course. Behavior is the means of adapting to life because they will be place for evil harm in life, although all people try in the sphere of behavior. The aim off carrying out this tipology consists of defining the speciality who depends on the religious sect of people in their ecologic consciousness. In other words the changing of relation fccording to both natural and social environment clears up how to influence their ecological imagination. In fact, the word “nature” means “the point of the thing” and the people. Thus, the conclusion, person is a part of nature, the changes in it may be stimulated the changes in nature. In positive pole “because if all people are well-bred, people won’t have place for evil harm” (0,590), “because it depends on your position in society” (0,516). In negative pole “because behavior has benefits for every person” (-0,408). The content analysis of this factor shows that students have the following idea about “behavior”; if every person undertakes according to their position in society, they won’t be place for evil harm in this life. In fact, (the negative pole of factor) the people who doesn’t respect the relations with other people think that behavior doesn’t derive no benefits for all people. We called this factor conditionally “behavior is as the criterion of being relations with other people”. If it includes the following emphasis which is situated on positive pole of the third factor; “because kindness is your human duty” (0,843), “because you think that behavior is wise thing” (0,506) but its negative pole consists of the following emphasis “because you think that you should respect the relations which depends on other people” (-0,462). Summarizing we would like to say that acccording to research work concerning learning the changes which comes true in students’ moral consciousness in the process of life and education: - the moral consciousness forming peculiarities in their time as a student are defined with moving from narrow family circumstances: - during student days moral consciousness of the students get into sharp deformation under the pressure of life and education: - the dynamics of students’ moral consciousness development gives some chances to carry out classification in the capacity of research object in the process of educational subject: - looking through the moral consciousness of students as static event may be reason for the misunderstanding which are in phsychological diagnostics results. References 1. Акрамов. М. Р. Психологические механизмы формирования экологического сознания личности. in proceedings of international conference on modern science and scientific studies (vol. 2, no. 12, pp. 527-532). 2. Акрамов, М. Р. (2023, September). Психологические вопросы изучения экологического сознания при формировании здоровой среды «зеленое пространство». In Proceedings of International Conference on Modern Science and Scientific Studies (Vol. 2, No. 9, pp. 50-55). 3. Акрамов, М. Р. (2023). Экoлoгик oнг шaкллaниши пcиxoлoгик фeнoмeн cифaтидa: Образование и инновационные исследования международный научно- методический журнал, (1), 319-323. American Journal of Research in Humanities and Social Sciences Volume 29 October - 2024 P a g e | 119 www.americanjournal.org 4. Акрамов М. Р. Экологическое сознание как особенность развития //вестник интегративной психологии. – с. 31. 5. akramov m. r. inson tabiat munosabatlarida ekologik ong xususiyatlarining shakllanishi //Academic research in educational sciences. – 2022. – №. Conference. – С. 80-83. 6. Акрамов М. Р. Психологические проблемы изучения формирования экологического сознания //Международный научно-практический электронный журнал «Моя профессиональная карьера». выпуск № 33 (том 1)(февраль, 2022). Дата выхода в свет: 28.02. 2022. – С. 97. 7. Акрамов М. Р. Психиканинг ривожланишига бўлган экопсихологик ёндашувнинг асосий қоидалари //Oriental renaissance: Innovative, educational, natural and social sciences. – 2021. – Т. 1. – №. Special Issue 2. – С. 199-202. 8. Акрамов М. Р. Психологические аспекты формирования экологического сознания личности //Наука и мир. – 2020. – №. 11. – С. 80-81. 9. Акрамов, М. Р. (2023, February). Формирование характеристик экологического сознания в отношении человека с природой. In Proceedings of International Conference on Scientific Research in Natural and Social Sciences (Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 113-118). 10. Falsafa: ensiklopedik lug‘at/O‘zR FA, I.Mo‘minov nomidagi falsafa va huquq in-ti.- T.: “O‘zbekiston milliy ensiklopediyasi” Davlat ilmiy nashriyoti, 2010.- 35 b 11. Falsafa qisqacha izohli lug‘at / M.N.Abdullaeva, M.Abdurashidov, U. Abilov va boshq.: T.: “SHarq”, 2004 y. 49 b. 12. Хвостов Андрей Анатолевич. Структура и детерминанты моралного сознания личности : Дис. ... д-ра психол. наук: М., 2005 496 c. 13. Botirov B.M. “O‘zbek mentalitetining psixologik xususiyatlari”- Toshkent, TDPU, 2011y. 64 b