



































International Journal of Biological Engineering and Agriculture


American Journal of Science and  

Learning for Development 
 

Volume 1 | No 2 | Dec-2022 

 

 

 
Published by inter-publishing.com  |  All rights reserved. © 2022 
Journal Homepage: https://inter-publishing.com/index.php/IJISE    

Page 137 

 

 

 
Taxis Category and Sphere of Temporary Influence 

 
 

Saidova Zakira Tolibovna 
 

 
Bukhara State Pedagogical Institute teacher 
  
  
 

Abstract: The reflection of the temporal picture of the world by linguistic consciousness occurs 

through a system of concepts in which it is objectified in the language on the basis of grammatical 

and lexico-grammatical semantics. Real time, conceptualized and objectified by a person in 

accordance with the general laws of cognition, forms the basis for the formation of the conceptual 

category of time (CT). 
 
Keywords: explicit, implicit, category of time, grammatical category, morphological and non-

morphological unit, conceptual category, fuctional-semantic category. 

 
  
At the level of linguistic semantic categorization, the conceptual category (CC) of time correlates 

with the functional-semantic category of temporality (FSC). Temporal FSK is a localization of 

movement in time. Under the temporal localization of movement, we have I.V. Reznik, we 

understand the definition of the place of action in the time continuum on the time-deictic axis. The 

temporal FSK is based on the corresponding FSM, which includes a group of multi-level linguistic 

means, united by a common semantic function related to the field of temporal relations, that is, 

relations whose content is the transfer of the localization of movement in time. Here are some 

examples: 

Morphological unit: specific forms of the verb. 

Non-morphological unit. 

1) Explicit: 

a) words with a temporary meaning: 

 adverbs (later, soon); 

 expressions with circumstantial adverbs (soon); 

 nominal phrases (with and without a preposition) (every other day, in the morning); 

 numerical phrases (preposition) (by 5, in 1975); 

b) phrases that do not contain words with the meaning of time as a leading component (the 

temporality component is expressed by a preposition): 

 expressions with a noun (after the meeting); 

2) Implicit: 

a) the place of work; 

b) the person performing the labor action; 

c) “semantic repetition” (an action in objective reality receives several names in the text for a more 

complete disclosure of its characteristics). 

The temporal GC, which constitutes the grammatical (morphological) core of the temporal FSM, is 

“a system of opposed grammatical forms (more precisely, a set of systems)." 



 

American Journal of Science and  Learning for Development Volume 1, No 2|    
Dec - 2022 

 

 
Published by inter-publishing.com  |  All rights reserved. © 2022 
Journal Homepage: http://inter-publishing.com/index.php/AJSLD    

Page 138 

 

The tense structure of the GC in English, that is, whether it should be considered as a two- or three-

term formation, has long been one of the most controversial issues in the English language. 

The main disagreements are based on two points: 

1. To include or not to include the grammatical form of the future tense (combination / will + 

infinitive) in the paradigm of morphological forms of the tense category. 

2. Inclusion in the morphological system of temporary forms of the complex of forms "Past Future" 

and in general - determination of the state of compounds "should/would + infinitive" in the 

grammatical system of the English language. 

In particular, the concept of the binomial nature of the temporal GC in English is stated, which is 

expressed in the opposition of the categorical forms of the present and past tenses: 

Many researchers believe that the temporal paradigm has a tripartite structure. So, A.I. Analyzing the 

structure of tenses in English, Smirnitsky notes the following: “The category of tenses in modern 

English primarily consists of the present and past tenses, because these tenses are synthetic. Also, 

historically, the category of time is based on the opposition of these two forms and goes back to 

ancient times. The categorical form of the future is always analytic and does not differ so clearly 

from them. It is difficult to doubt the existence of genetically related free combinations. With the 

meaning of the future, this form "is inserted into the system of tenses of the corresponding verb as an 

analytic form, which turns out not to be two-membered, but three-membered." Thus, "the category of 

time is represented by two sets of synthetic forms: the present and past tenses and a number of 

analytical forms of the future tense" 

At the conceptual level, the concepts of the taxi category and temporality interact. Facts 

characterized by the relation of simultaneity and non-simultaneity (onset or sequence) occur in real 

(objective) or fictitious time. As for the level of linguistic semantics, we are talking about the 

interaction of FSK-taxis and FSM temporality. Taxis expressed conjugation of actions (components 

of the polypredicative complex) in a certain time plan, i.e. observed in the past, present or future 

(preterite or futurum). 

As for the grammatical system of the language, on the one hand, we are talking about the interaction 

of the semantics of the grammatical categories of time and temporal relation (spot/relativity or phase 

category), which form the grammatical basis of the corresponding language. . Functional-semantic 

fields, on the other hand, interact between central and peripheral means of representing taxis and 

temporality. 

The list of literature: 

1. Dependent taxis: Semantic features and methods of expression in English D. Izzatilloevna, S.Z. 

Tolibovna ASIAN JOURNAL OF MULTIDIMENSIONAL RESEARCH 10 (5), 318-321 

2. THE ORIGIN AND JUSTIFICATION OF THE TERM TAXIS IN LINGUISTICS D.I. 

KHODJAYEVA, Z.T. SAIDOVA E-Conference Globe, 375-379 

3. Taxis-Relative Time¬-Evidentiality D.I. Khodjayeva, Z.T. Saidova Proceedings of International 

Scientific-Theoritical Webinar. Bukhara, 38-43 

4. TAXIS AND THE GRAMMATICAL CATEGORY OF TEMPORAL REFERENCE S.Z. 

Tolibovna EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INNOVATION IN NONFORMAL EDUCATION 2 (2), 

277-280 

5. Dependent and independent taxis S.Z. Tolibovna ―Dependent and independent taxis‖, 

IPFTSLTP, pp 293-295 

6. Taksis Kategoriyasi: Turli Qarashlar Va Yondashuvlar Kh.D. Izatilloevna, S.Z. Tolibovna 

"ONLINECONFERENCES" PLATFORM, 234-238 

7. TAXIS AS A CONCEPTUAL AND FUNCTIONAL-SEMANTIC CATEGORY. S.Z. Tolibovna 

ЦЕНТР НАУЧНЫХ ПУБЛИКАЦИЙ (buxdu. Uz) 8 (8) 

 


