



































International Journal of Biological Engineering and Agriculture


American Journal of Science and  

Learning for Development 
 

Volume 1 | No 2 | Dec-2022 

 

 

 
Published by inter-publishing.com  |  All rights reserved. © 2022 
Journal Homepage: https://inter-publishing.com/index.php/IJISE    

Page 218 

 

 

 
Description of Linguistik Variation Derivation and Use in Russian 

from the Point of Linguopragmatics 

 
 

Sultanova Sevara Ruslanovna 
 

 
Lecturer, Department of Russian Philology, Ferghana State University, Uzbekistan 
  
  
 

Abstract: This study examines the active and productive process of changing word classes in 

Russian through derivation processes. This word formation process consists of a verb lexeme, noun, 

adjective, or adverb associated with a derived suffix. This is a descriptive study that follows the 

typological perspective of word class formation. 
 
Keywords: typology, word classes, word formation process. 

 
  
Introduction 

Russian, as a very inflectional and morphologically rich language, provides many variants of case 

properties. The case category in Russian is a complex and abstract grammatical system of contrasts 

with obscure semantics. In addition, it is complicated by opaque forms and connections between 

number (singular and plural), genus (three generic systems: male, female, and middle), and 

declension (three types of declension). Moreover, the acquisition of cases creates difficulties due to 

various other aspects. 

For example, the difference in the validity of signals associated with different cases is reflected in the 

order in which they are absorbed by children. Presumably, less frequent and less pronounced cases 

are acquired later in childhood than more frequent and pronounced ones. 

While different researchers agree that the acquisition of different cases occurs somewhat 

consistently, there is no consensus on the exact order in which cases are acquired in the literature. 

This study analyzes the main derivation types that change word classes in Mapuche. We will see that 

derivation possibilities in this language depend in part on its morphological richness, especially on 

the abundant number of existing suffixes used in this process, and that among their properties they 

show greater productivity by being multifunctional. output new word classes, for example, to mark 

the form, mood, and change the verbal structures, properties, and actions of derivatives that change 

word classes and between them, they represent cases of verbalization, nominalization, adjectives. 

There are various word formation procedures in which the lexical extension of the language is 

possible. According to G.V. Belyakov, "derivation is the most important and widely used procedure 

in the Russian language. It consists in creating a new word by obtaining it from a combination of 

root lexeme, noun, verb, adjective and suffix "[1]. 

According to typological analysis, the Russian language is inflective, which has a pattern of 

including affixes that make semantic, morphological and syntactic changes, including the inclusion 

of nouns, object signs, and a person to the verb root. 

The study of the communicative aspect of word formation and, in particular, the derivation process 

in media history has become one of the most important topics in the lexical sphere. In domestic and 

foreign linguistic literature, various approaches to the study of derived vocabulary are demonstrated: 



 

American Journal of Science and  Learning for Development Volume 1, No 2|    
Dec - 2022 

 

 
Published by inter-publishing.com  |  All rights reserved. © 2022 
Journal Homepage: http://inter-publishing.com/index.php/AJSLD    

Page 219 

 

structural-semantic (Fathutdinova, 2015; Ilyasova, 2016), linguoculturological (Erofeeva, 2014, 

Wendina, 1998), cognitive (Baranov, Dobrovolsky, 1996; Gorobets)., Kulsharipova, Novak, 2016), 

and methodological (Hashemi, 2011, Martyanov, Gorobets, Novak, 2016). The study of active 

derivational processes based on media and which are a kind of catalyst for language transformation 

allows us to identify critical changes in the word formation system of the Russian language and trace 

the trends in the development of word use in general. 

Research methodology 

The research methodology involves the use of means of linguistic description with elements of the 

interpretation of typical derived units, a continuous selection of lexical materials, structural-semantic 

word-forming analysis and contextual analysis - when describing the action of the noun derivation 

process. 

Study results 

The language of newspaper periodicals has recently become a sphere of increased word formation 

activity, as it illustrates a huge number of word derivatives obtained by conventional methods of 

word formation. The data revealed the following patterns of word formation, reflecting active 

processes in modern Russian: suffixing, prefixing and zero suffixation. 

As is known, morphological derivatives can be obtained by adding suffixes or prefixes. Suffixation 

is one of the most popular ways to form new words in Russian. 

It is in the suffix sphere that there is a more active interaction of 1) borrowed suffixes with both 

Russian and foreign-language word bases; 2) Russian suffixes with both borrowed and original 

producing bases; 3) stylistically heterogeneous morphemic parts: book suffixes and foundations in 

the original stylistically reduced words and vice versa. 

Progress in the productivity of some suffix models is noted within the following lexical groups: 

1. Names of persons with the meaning of the carrier (subject or procedural), formed by: 

A) Foreign language productive book suffixes -ист, -атор, -ант (-ист, -атор, -ант) combined with 

foreign-language and Russian fundamentals: лоббист, перформансист, нашиист (член 

организации «Наши»), подписант, номинант, номинатор, коммуникатор и монетизатор; 

B) Through Russian suffixes -ник, -чик/-щик, -ец/-ов/-овец (-ник, -чик/-щик, -ец/-ов/-овец) from 

non-native foundations: оффшорник, интернетчик, пиаровец, спамщик. The semantics of this 

subgroup of words are significantly expanding: in addition to naming a person by his occupation or 

interests, they can matter 'сторонник, последователь чего-либо: государственник (сторонник 

государственной власти), ЛДПР-овец (сторонник партии ЛДПР), ЕГЭшник (лицо, сдавшее 

ЕГЭ). The generating base here is often a proper name combined with a suffix ец (-овец): 

обамовец, порошенковец, зюгановец [2]. 

2. Names with a characteristic value formed by Russian suffixes - ск, -ов/-овск, -н (-ск, -ов/-овск, -

н) combined with borrowed basics: шенгенский, узерский, онлайновый, Пиаровский, творческий. 

3. Action designations formed by verbal suffixes - ирова, -ова, -и (-ирова, -ова, -и): a) from 

borrowed foundations of common names: брендировать, производить, литье, офшорить; 

b) from the foundations of proper names: гайдарить, чубайсить, навальничать, петросянить 

4. Names of abstract semantics with Russian suffixes: -ость/-есть, - ств (о)(-ост, -ест, -ств (о) and 

borrowed: -изм, -инг, (-изм, - инг), their appearance is associated with an increase in production 

foundations due to the expansion of the simple and slang foundations existing in Russian, foreign-

language foundations, as well as using the main proper names: показушность, ненашесть, 

жесткокизм, лоббизм [2]. 

 

 



 

American Journal of Science and  Learning for Development Volume 1, No 2|    
Dec - 2022 

 

 
Published by inter-publishing.com  |  All rights reserved. © 2022 
Journal Homepage: http://inter-publishing.com/index.php/AJSLD    

Page 220 

 

Conclusion 

The most productive affixal means of word formation include suffixation, prefix, zero suffixation, 

and affixoid word formation, with suffixation proving to be the most popular means. Therefore, one 

of the most effective ways of modern word formation is to attach the original Russian affixes to 

borrowed foundations, where suffixes are most demanding. At the current stage of development, 

word-forming types have become more adaptive. The system of affixation word-forming types is so 

stable that it can easily process borrowed bases, forming derivatives with Russian affixes. At the 

same time, Russian foundations are actively involved in word formation, that is, in creating new 

words according to effective patterns. 

Such words are a system-forming property of Russian word formation: word-forming morphology in 

productive samples is contextually conditioned and situationally dependent, and the data made it 

possible to note a noticeable activation of foreign-language affixes, the most productive of which are 

prefixes. 

Contributing to an increase in the personal criterion, word formation in the media resource performs 

not only a nominative function, but also an expressive-evaluative one, and the latter is more 

significant for modern journalism. The derivation process is an effective means of making the text 

more expressive, moreover, they have an evaluability or seek to acquire it, since their evaluative 

nature is syntagmatically and contextually conditioned. Word formation turns into an effective 

axiological manual and one of the tools of social assessment in the oral activities of media 

personalities. 

Thus, our study showed that real affixal word formation is one of the most important functional and 

dynamically developing mechanisms in the Russian derivation system. 

References used 

1. Belyakova G.V. Word-forming category of suffixal locative nouns in modern Russian. - 

Publishing house "Astrakhan University," 2007. 

2. Erofeeva I.V. Personal word formation in the language of Russian annals//dis.... Doctor of Philol. 

sciences. – 2010. - T. 10. – №. 01. 

3. Sultanova S.R. On the definition of the terms “Variology”,“Variation”,“Variability”. 

ACADEMICIA: An International Multidisciplinary Research Journal. 2307-2310 South Asian 

Academic Research Journals. 2021 

4. Sultanova S.R., Alimov T.E. GENERAL THEORY OF LINGUISTIC VARIATION. EPRA 

International Journal of Research and Development (IJRD) Volume: 6 | Issue: 1 | January 2021 

5. Sultanova S.R. Kurbanova M. THE ROLE OF NEOLOGISMS IN THE LANGUAGE OF 

MODERN MEDIA. CURRENT RESEARCH JOURNAL OF PHILOLOGICAL SCIENCES 

(2767-3758). JOURNAL OF PHILOLOGICAL SCIENCES (2767-3758 …, 2021) 

https://scholar.google.ru/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=ru&user=J4z2VZIAAAAJ&citation_for_view=J4z2VZIAAAAJ:9yKSN-GCB0IC
https://www.eprajournals.com/jpanel/upload/650pm_5.EPRA%20JOURNALS-6058.pdf
http://www.masterjournals.com/index.php/crjps/article/view/533
http://www.masterjournals.com/index.php/crjps/article/view/533

