25 Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis Studia Naturae, 6: 25–47, 2021, ISSN 2543-8832 DOI: 10.24917/25438832.6.2 Anna Sołtys-Lelek1*, Wojciech Gruszka2 1Ojców National Park, 32-045 Sułoszowa, Ojców 9, Poland; *ana_soltys@wp.pl 2Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Physical Culture in Gorzów Wlkp., Poznań University School of Physical Education, Estkowskiego 13, 66-400 Gorzów Wlkp., Poland Roses and hawthorns in an urban area: a case study of Gorzów Wielkopolski in Poland (NW Poland) Introduction A  record of the �ora in Gorzów, Poland, has not been coherently compiled. Scarce �oristic data are presented in only a few publications. A total of 898 species of vascular plants (518 apophytes and 380 anthropophytes) have been found thus far. Studying mainly synanthropic �ora and green areas of the city, the following species were iden- ti�ed: Crataegus monogyna Jacq., C. laevigata (Poir.) DC. (under the synonymic name Crataegus oxyacantha L.), C. laevigata ‘Paul’s Scarlet’ (under the synonymic name C. oxyacantha L. Paul’s Scarlet), C. punctata Jacq., C. crus-galli L., C. coccinea L., and C. ×carrieri Fauvel. In the genus Rosa, the following species were identi�ed: Rosa rugosa �unb., R. canina L. (under the synonymic name R. dumetorum �uill.), R. rubiginosa L., and R. multi�ora �unb. Misiewicz (1981, 1986). Data on rose and hawthorn species occurring in the study area are also included in Zając and Zając (2001, 2019), where the following species were listed (generally in ATPOL squares): Crataegus monogyna (AC67 square), C. rhipidophylla (AC57 square) and Rosa canina (squares: AC57, AC67). As shown in the publication of Sołtys-Lelek and Barabasz-Krasny (2015), areas in the north and east of Poland still require research and supplementation in terms of the occurrence of roses and hawthorns. �erefore, the aim of this research was to supple- ment the state of knowledge on the current distribution of the critical genera Crataegus L. and Rosa L. in this area, including presenting the full species composition and their distribution around Gorzów Wielkopolski. A nn a S oł ty s- Le le k, W oj ci ec h G ru sz ka 26 Study area � e city of Gorzów Wielkopolski, with an area of 86.3 km², is located on the Warta River in north-western Poland, in Lubusz Voivodeship. According to the physical and geographic classi� cation, it is situated within two mesoregions “Gorzów Plain” and “Gorzów Valley” (Kondracki, 2001). � e average annual air temperature is 7.9 °C. � e warmest month is July (17.2 °C), and the coldest month is January (–1.4 °C). � e av- erage annual precipitation is 500–600 mm (Studium, 2014). � e length of the growing season is 220 days (Misiewicz, 1981). � e city area is varied in terms of plant communities. Aquatic and rush communities occur primarily in the Warta River valley. Meadow-pasture and tall-herb vegetation appears in many places and constitutes an important natural and landscape element in the city. However, most of the area is occupied by anthropogenic segregated and ruderal communities. Moreover, there are 10 city parks and 24 larger arranged squares and green areas. � e city area is poor in forest areas. In the eastern areas of the city borders, there is one compact forest complex. Moreover, a small fragment of forest complex enters the city area from the north. Tree stands in this area are mainly pine, with some oak and birch. One of the most valuable natural areas of the city, where some remnants of naturalness have been preserved, is a mainstay of xerothermic � ora communities, which Fig. 1. Division of ATPOL (Atlas of Poland) squares into squares with a side of 1 km R oses and haw thorns in an urban area: a case study of G orzów W ielkopolski in P oland (N W P oland) 27 has been legally protected as the “Gorzowskie Murawy” reserve since 2006 (Studium, 2014; Pyszny et al., 2018). Materials and methods Floristic materials were collected in 2017–2019 using the �eld cartogram method, based on a  grid of 10 × 10 km ATPOL squares. Each square was divided into 100 smaller squares (1 km side) that were each treated as a single site. Details of the ATPOL grid were adopted in accordance with methodological assumptions of the “Distribution atlas of vascular plants in Poland – ATPOL” (Zając, 1978; Komsta, 2016; Verey, 2017 – Fig. 1, Appendix 1a, b). All herbarium materials were deposited in the Herbarium of the University School of Physical Education, Gorzow Wielkopolski (Poland). Data from the literature were also included. �e taxonomic approach and nomenclature were based on the works of Zieliński (1985, 1987), Christensen (1992, 1997), Popek (1996), and Henker (2000). �e number of habitats was the basis used to de�ne the frequency of taxa occurrence: 1–4 stands – very rare species, 5–15 – rare species, 15–30 – not so frequent, 31–50 – quite frequent, 51–80 – frequent, 81–100 – very frequent, > 100 – common. Abbreviations used in the list of species: (N) – new taxa for the study area, * – an- thropophyte, ◊ – cultivated species. Results �e list contains 11 hawthorn taxa, including 6 native taxa of the genus Crataegus L., belonging to 2 subseries Erianthae and Crataegus, and 5 classi�ed as cultivated or- namental taxa. Moreover, 14 taxa of the genus Rosa L. belonged to the sections Cin- namomeae DC. (1 species), Caninae DC. em. H. Christ (11 taxa), and Synstylae DC. (1 species). Among them, there were 10 native species, including 2 native hybrid forms at the rank of species; 2 anthropophytes; 1 cultivated species; and 1 hybrid form. A total of 13 taxa new to the �ora of the study area were found: 3 hawthorn taxa and 10 rose taxa. A detailed list of localities with GPS coordinates is provided in Appendix 1 for the genus Crataegus and in Appendix 2 for the genus Rosa. Genus Crataegus L. Ser. Crataegus Subser. Erianthae 1. Crataegus laevigata (Poiret) DC. Synon.: C. oxyacantha L. A nn a S oł ty s- Le le k, W oj ci ec h G ru sz ka 28 Rare species. �is species was reported in the study area by Misiewicz (1981) under the synonymic name Crataegus oxyacantha L., as generally rare on roadsides and in thickets and parks. It was not found by the authors of this paper. Misiewicz (1986) reported at 3 localities: AC6706, AC6715, AC6716 Subser. Crataegus 2. Crataegus rhipidophylla Gand. var. rhipipophylla Very rare species – 3 records from 3 localities. Species previously reported in ATPOL square AC57 (Zając, Zając, 2019) 3. Crataegus monogyna Jacq. var. monogyna Quite frequent species – 75 records in 45 stands. Species previously reported in ATPOL square AC67 (Zając, Zając, 2001) and generally, by Misiewicz (1981, 1986). 4. Crataegus ×macrocarpa Hegetschw nothovar. macrocarpa (N) [C. laevigata (Poiret) DC. × C. rhipidophylla Gand.var. rhipidophylla] Very rare hybrid – 2 records from 2 localities. 5. Crataegus ×subsphaericea Gand. nothovar. subsphaericea (N) [C. monogyna Jacq. × C. rhipidophylla Gand. var. rhipidophylla] Not so frequent hybrid – 19 records from 16 localities. 6. Crataegus ×media Bechst. (N) [C. laevigata (Poiret) DC. × C. monogyna Jacq.] Very rare hybrid – 1 record from 1 locality. Ornamental, cultivated taxa of hawthorns 7. ◊Crataegus laevigata ‘Paul’s Scarlet’ Rare variety reported by Misiewicz (1986) as C. oxyacantha L. ‘Paul’s Scarlet’ – 9 locali- ties: AC5797, AC6704, AC6705, AC6706, AC6707, AC6715, AC6716, AC6723, AC6726, and as element of urban street greenery. 8. *Crataegus punctata Jacq. Very rare species reported by Misiewicz (1986) – 1 locality: AC6726 9. *Crataegus crus-galli L. Very rare species reported by Misiewicz (1986) – 1 locality: AC6715 10. *Crataegus coccinea L. Very rare species reported by Misiewicz (1986) – 2 localities: AC6715, AC6716 and as element of urban street greenery. 11. ◊Crataegus ×carrieri Fauvel. Very rare hybrid reported by Misiewicz (1986) – 1 locality: AC6715 and as element of urban street greenery. R oses and haw thorns in an urban area: a case study of G orzów W ielkopolski in P oland (N W P oland) 29 Fig. 2. Rosa dumalis Bechst. var. caballicensis (Puget) Boulenger; A – part of fruiting short shoot, B – thorn, C – glandular fruit, D – fruit, styles of semi-circular head type, E – double-serrated leaf margin, F – part of leaf (underside), hairless. Solid bar = 1 cm (Photo. 2018, A. Sołtys-Lelek, specimen from Poland, Gorzów Wielkopolski city, leg. 2017, W. Gruszka) Genus Rosa L. I. Sect. Cinnamomeae DC. 1. *Rosa rugosa �unb. Very rare species (anthropophyte) – 5 records in 4 stands. Species previously reported by Misiewicz (1981, 1986) as occasional on escarpments, roadsides, and embankments. A nn a S oł ty s- Le le k, W oj ci ec h G ru sz ka 30 II. Sect. Caninae DC. em. H. Christ. 2. Rosa dumalis Bechst. (N) Syn.: R. afzeliana Fr., R. glauca Vill, R. caesia Sm., R. coriifolia Fr. Not so frequent species obtained from 25 localities as 4 varieties: a) var. afzeliana (Fr.) Boulenger Rare variety – 10 records from 9 localities. b) var. caballicensis (Puget) Boulenger (Fig. 2) Very rare variety – 1 record from 1 locality. c) var. dumalis Rare variety – 12 records from 11 localities. d) var. acharii (Billb.) Boulenger Very rare variety – 1 record from 1 locality. e) var. coriifolia (Fr.) Boulenger Very rare variety – 3 records from 3 localities. 3. Rosa villosa L. var. villosa (N) Very rare species – 1 record from 1 locality. 4. Rosa sherardii Davies (N) Very rare species, obtained from 4 localities as 2 varieties: a) var. sherardii Very rare variety – 3 records from 3 localities. b) var. collivaga (Cottet) Boulenger Very rare variety – 1 record from 1 locality. 5. Rosa tomentosa Sm. var. cinerascens (Dumurt.) Crépin (N) Very rare variety – 1 record from 1 locality. 6. Rosa rubiginosa L. Rare species, obtained from 10 localities as 2 varieties: a) var. rubiginosa Very rare variety – 1 record from 1 locality. b) var. umbellata (Leers) Dumort. Rare variety – 9 records from 5 localities. Species previously reported by Misiewicz (1981, 1986) as occasional in thickets and on roadside escarpments and buttresses. 7. Rosa inodora Fr. var. indora (N) Very rare species – 4 records from 4 localities. 8. Rosa canina L. Common species, formerly reported by Misiewicz (1981) as R. dumetórum �uill. Later, reported by Zając, Zając, (2001) from ATPOL squares AC57 and AC67. Currently found as �ve varieties at 115 localities: a) var. canina R oses and haw thorns in an urban area: a case study of G orzów W ielkopolski in P oland (N W P oland) 31 Rare variety – 9 records from 8 localities. b) var. andegavensis (Bastard.) Desp. Very rare variety – 4 records from 4 localities. c) var. dumalis Baker Frequent variety – 132 records from 57 localities. d) var. deseglisei (Boreau) Crépin Very rare variety – 2 records from 2 localities. e) var. corymbifera (Borkh.) Boulenger Not so frequent variety – 26 records from 19 localities. 9. Rosa jundzillii Besler var. jundzillii (N) (Fig. 3A – Appendix 2) Very rare variety – 3 records from 3 localities. 10. Rosa ×subcanina (H. Christ) Vok. (N) Hybrid originating from R. dumalis Bechst. × R. canina L. with bare leaves that are not hairy. It was reported here following Henker (2000) in species rank. Not so frequent taxon – 16 records from 16 localities. 11. Rosa ×subcollina (H. Christ) Vok. (N) Hybrid originating from R. dumalis Bechst. × R. canina L. with hairy leaves. It was reported here following Henker (2000) in species rank. Very rare taxon – 5 records from 4 localities. 12. Rosa canina L. × R. rubiginosa L. (N) Very rare hybrid – 1 record from 1 locality. III. Sect. Synstylae DC. 13. *Rosa multi�ora �unb. Very rare species (anthropophyte) – 5 records from 4 stands. Species previously reported by Misiewicz (1986) as planted in green areas. Old garden hybrids occurring as semi-wild 14. ◊Rosa ×francofourtana Muenchh. (N) (Fig. 3B – Appendix 2) Very rare hybrid – 1 record from 1 locality. Discussion Within the study area, the list of species in the genus Crataegus and Rosa comprised a total of 25 taxa, including 11 hawthorn species and 14 rose taxa. Among those identi�ed, as many as 13 taxa were new to the �ora of Gorzów Wielkopolski. �ese were: Crataegus ×macrocarpa, C. ×subsphaericea, C. ×media, Rosa dumalis, R. villosa, R. sherardii, R. to- mentosa, R. inodora, R. jundzillii, R. ×subcanina, R. ×subcollina, an old, cultivated variety of R. ×francofourtana, and the interspeci�c hybrid Rosa canina × R. rubiginosa. A nn a S oł ty s- Le le k, W oj ci ec h G ru sz ka 32 �e study also provided detailed data on both the distribution of localities (Ap- pendix 1, 2) and the number of localities of species already reported in the area. �is allowed a  more precise determination of the frequency of occurrence and provided a more accurate picture of their distribution in the study area. �is applies, for exam- ple, to Rosa rubiginosa or R. canina, which are common species in Poland, that were previously reported from a single or few localities (Misiewicz, 1981, 1986). �e data obtained during the study con�rmed the poor state of knowledge regarding this area thus far. As indicated previously, some regions, e.g., the northern part of the country, require additional research and supplementation in terms of the occurrence of roses (Sołtys-Lelek, Barabasz-Krasny, 2015) and hawthorns. Regarding the frequency of rose and hawthorn occurrence in the study area, 17 taxa were classi�ed as very rare and were found in 4 localities, at most. �e rarest taxa were those found at single localities: Crataegus ×media, C. crus-galli, Rosa tomentosa, R. villosa, R. ×francofourtana, and the hybrid Rosa canina × R. rubiginosa. �e most common species were Rosa canina (115 localities), Crataegus monogyna (45 localities), and Rosa dumalis (25 localities). �ese were also the most common species of hawthorns and roses growing wild in Poland. During �eld research, hybrid forms were found with characteristics that were intermediate between R. canina and R. dumalis. Additionally, forms that di�ered slightly in appearance from typical R. dumalis specimens were identi�ed. According to some authors (Henker, 2000), they are attributed to a  hybrid origin (R. dumalis × R. canina) and distinguished as separate taxa; R. ×subcanina had bare, non-hairy leaves, and R. ×subcollina had hairy leaves. According to other authors (Zieliński, 1985, 1987), these are only morphologically extreme groups of R. dumalis forms that, when combined with its typical specimens, comprise numerous intermediate individuals. In the present study, the concept by Henker (2000) was adopted to dis- tinguish them as separate taxa. �e highest intraspeci�c variation was recorded for Rosa canina and R. dumalis, within which 5 varieties each were found. Among them, the most noteworthy were Rosa canina varieties, which are uncommon in Poland (Popek, 1996). �ese includ- ed: R. canina var. andegavensis with glandular peduncles and bare non-hairy leaves or R. canina var. deseglisei with glandular peduncles and hairy leaves. R. canina var. andegavensis has thus far been known only in the Wielkopolska Lowland, the Sudeten Foreland, the Płock Upland, and Piła, and R. canina var. deseglisei from the Szczecin, Silesian and Cracow Uplands, the Nida Basin, the Silesian Beskid, and Piła (Popek, 1996; Sołtys-Lelek, 2011, 2012; Sołtys-Lelek, Gruszka, 2016). Other more interesting varieties of roses found in this area undoubtedly include Rosa dumalis. R. dumalis var. acharii has glandular peduncles and sepals, and its fruits and leaves are complexly glandular and saw-toothed. In contrast, R. dumalis var. R oses and haw thorns in an urban area: a case study of G orzów W ielkopolski in P oland (N W P oland) 33 caballicensis has glandular peduncles and sepals, but its leaves are singly or doubly saw-toothed. R. dumalis var. acharii has been reported in the Miechowska and Lubel- ska Uplands and the Pieniny Mountains. It also occurs sporadically in Central and Southern Europe (Popek, 1996). However, R. dumalis var. caballicensis is known only from Western Pomerania near Chojnice (Popek, 1996). Rosa sherardii var. collivaga, with leaves and peduncles that are not glandular, belongs to the group of rare taxa in Poland. It has been reported mainly from western and northern (near Kłodzko, Wałbrzych, Chojnów, Zielona Góra, Szczecin, and Piła) and southern Poland (Pieniny and Cracow-Częstochowa Upland; Popek, Szeląg, 1993; Popek, 1996; Sołtys-Lelek, 2011; Sołtys-Lelek, Gruszka, 2016). Furthermore, an interesting species found in the study area was Rosa jundzillii. It is a rare species in Poland, occurring mainly in the southern part of the country (Sudeten Foothills, Silesian Lowland, and Kielce-Sandomierska Upland), and is distributed in the central part of the country. In the Gorzów Upland, it has not been reported thus far (Zając, Zając, 2001; Popek, 2002). However, this site is located in a long-urbanized area; thus, its origin is not fully known. It is likely that it may be a remnant of former cultivation. Among hawthorns, the most interesting taxa are Crataegus ×subsphaericea and Crataegus ×macrocarpa, which are mainly reported in the south and east of Poland, while information about their occurrence in the northern part of the country is scarce (Christensen, 1992; Sołtys-Lelek, 2011, 2012; Oklejewicz, Vončina, 2012; Oklejewicz et al., 2013, 2014, 2015; Sołtys-Lelek, Gruszka, 2016, 2020; Zając, Zając, 2019). Crategus laevigata, which was previously reported by Misiewicz (1981, 1986), could not be found in this study. It is a common species in Poland, and the studied area is with- in its range. �e localities where it occurred may have been transformed due to urban development of the city. However, specimens of this genus may be found in the future. �e species of the studied genus are a valuable element of the city �ora. �e �ora that occurs here is characterised by speci�c conditions in areas that are urbanised to varying degrees. �e �ora of Gorzów Wielkopolski, on the one hand, is formed spontaneously, because of natural succession, and on the other hand, is also consciously cultivated by man. �e following plants were planted in the study area for their decorative value: Rosa rugosa, R. multi�ora, R. ×francofourtana, Crataegus laevigata ‘Paul’s Scarlet’, C. punctata, C. crus-galli, C. coccinea and C. ×carrieri. For rose and hawthorn species, the greatest number of localities was found in habitats described as wastelands. �ey also grow quite numerously on roadsides. �e two most common species in Poland – Rosa canina and R. dumalis – were found in all distinguished habitat types, such as wastelands, roadsides, forest edges, and urban green areas. Additionally, the localities of Crataegus monogyna and Crataegus ×subsphaericea were recorded in a wide range of habitats, mainly the anthropogenic ones mentioned A nn a S oł ty s- Le le k, W oj ci ec h G ru sz ka 34 above. Only Crataegus ×media was found in the natural habitat at the forest edge. �e results obtained in this study were consistent with the literature data, which con�rm the preference of roses and hawthorns in open, thermophilic, and heliophilic habitats (e.g., Zieliński, 1987; Christensen, 1996; Popek, 2002; Barabasz-Krasny, Sołtys-Lelek, 2011; Sołtys-Lelek, 2011, 2012; Oklejewicz et al., 2013, 2014, 2015; Sołtys-Lelek, Gruszka, 2016, 2020). In general, a set of native hawthorn species and more than half of the rose species reported in Poland (considering only native species) were found within the study area. Such a result indicates the high species richness of a small area and human-transformed study site. Acknowledgements �e authors of this paper would like to thank Mr. Krzysztof Witków and Mr. Tadeusz Gruszka for their help in �eld research. Con�ict of interest �e authors declare no con�ict of interest related to this article. References Barabasz-Krasny, B., Sołtys-Lelek, A. (2011). Wstępne badania nad rozmieszczeniem krytycznych taksonów z rodzaju Crataegus L. i Rosa L. na odłogach Pogórza Przemyskiego (Initial studies on the distribution of critical taxa of the genus Crataegus L. and Rosa L. in the fallow lands of the Przemyśl Foothills). Roczniki Bieszczadzkie, 19, 93–112. [In Polish] Christensen, K.I. (1992). Revision of Crataegus Sect. Crataegus and Nothosect. Crataeguineae (Rosace- ae-Maloideae) in the Old World. Systematic Botany Monographs, 35, 1–199. Christensen, K.I. (1997). Typi�cation of Crataegus kyrtostyla Fingerh. In: R. Wisskirchen, (ed.), Notulae ad Floram Germanicam I. Feddes Repertorium Berlin, 108(1–2), 1–104. Henker, H. (2000). Rosa. In: G. Hegi, H.E. Weber (ed.). Illustrierte Flora von Mitteleuropa. Band 4/2c. Berlin. Parey Buchverlag, 1–108. [In German] Komsta, Ł. (2016). Mathematical revision of the ATPOL geobotanical grid – proposed algorithms for the conversion of coordinates (Rewizja matematyczna siatki geobotanicznej ATPOL – propozycja algorytmów konwersji współrzędnych). Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, Sectio E – Agricultura, 71(1), 31–37. [In Polish] Kondracki, J. (2001). Geogra�a regionalna Polski (Regional geography of Poland). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN. [In Polish] Misiewicz, J. (1981). Research on the synanthropic �ora of Gorzów Wielkopolski (Badania nad �orą synan- tropijną Gorzowa Wielkopolskiego). Słupsk: WSP. [In Polish] Misiewicz, J. (1986). Tereny zielone Gorzowa Wielkopolskiego (Tereny zieleni Gorzowa Wielkopolskiego) (Green areas of Gorzów Wielkopolski (Green areas of Gorzów Wielkopolski). Gorzów Wielkopolski: Wydawca GOBiEN Gorzów Wlkp. [In Polish] Oklejewicz, K., Chwastek, E., Szewczyk, M., Bobiec, A., Mitka, J. (2013). Distribution of Crataegus (Rosace- ae) in S-E Poland along a gradient of anthropogenic in�uence. Polish Journal of Ecology, 61(4), 683–691. Oklejewicz, K., Chwastek, E., Szewczyk, M., Ortyl, B., Mitka, J. (2014). Chorologiczne aspekty występowania głogów w Karpatach Polskich (Chorological aspects of hawthorn occurrence in the Polish Carpathians). Rzeszów: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Rzeszowskiego. [In Polish] R oses and haw thorns in an urban area: a case study of G orzów W ielkopolski in P oland (N W P oland) 35 Oklejewicz, K., Szewczyk, M., Wolanian, M. (2015). Crataegus w Bieszczadach (Crataegus in the Bieszczady Mountains). Roczniki Bieszczadzkie, 23, 55–70. [In Polish] Oklejewicz, K., Vončina, G. (2012). Rodzaj Crataegus w Pieninach (Genus Crataegus in Pieniny). Przyroda i Człowiek, 12, 71–79. [In Polish] Popek, R. (1996). Biosystematyczne studia nad rodzajem Rosa L. w Polsce i krajach ościennych (Biosystematic studies on the genus Rosa L. in Poland and neighbouring countries). Kraków: Prace Monogra�czne WSP Nr 218. Popek, R. (2002). Polish wild roses. Key-Atlas. (Róże dziko rosnące Polski. Klucz–Atlas). Kraków: Plantpress. [In Polish] Popek, R., Szeląg, Z. (1993). Róże Pienin (Pieniny roses). Fragmenta Floristica et Geobotanica, 38(1), 227–235. [In Polish] Pyszny, K., Różyński, R., Sojka, M., Jaskóła, J., Binder, M. (2018). Opracowanie eko�zjogra�czne podstawo- we dla całego obszaru miasta Gorzów Wielkopolski. Ocena stanu i funkcjonowania środowiska (Basic ecophysiographic study for the entire area of the city of Gorzów Wielkopolski. Assessment of the state and functioning of the environment). Poznań: EnviMap Krzysztof Pyszny. [In Polish] Sołtys-Lelek, A. (2011). Chorologia krytycznych rodzajów – Crataegus L., Rosa L., Rubus L. na Wyżynie Krakowsko-Częstochowskiej (Chorology of critical genera – Crataegus L., Rosa L., Rubus L. in the Kraków-Częstochowa Upland). Prądnik. Prace Muzeum im. W. Szafera, 21, 5–109. [In Polish] Sołtys-Lelek, A. (2012). Crataegus and Rosa genera in the Solec Basin and southern part of the Pińczów Hummock (Southern Poland). Biodivesity Research and Conservation, 25, 55–66. Sołtys-Lelek, A., Barabasz-Krasny, B. (2015). Genera Rosa L. in Poland – current research and the per- spectives of future study on the subject. In: V. Kerényi-Nagy, O. Szirmai, L. Helyes, K. Penksza, A. Neményi (eds.), “1st Rose- and Hawthorn conference in Carpathian Basin” international conference 29–30th May 2015. Proceedings-Book. Hungary: Godollő. Sołtys-Lelek, A., Gruszka, W. (2016). Wild roses and hawthorns of urban area: a  case study of Piła in Poland. Biodiversity Research and Conservation, 43, 27–40. Sołtys-Lelek, A., Gruszka, W. (2020). Wild Rosa L. and Crataegus L. taxa of the Middle Noteć River Valley (NW Poland). Biodiversity Research and Conservation, 57, 13–22. Studium uwarunkowań i  kierunków zagospodarowania przestrzennego miasta Gorzowa Wlkp. (Study of the conditions and directions of spatial development in the city of Gorzów Wlkp.) (2014). Urząd Miasta Gorzowa Wielkopolskiego. [In Polish] Verey, M. (2017). Teoretyczna analiza i  praktyczne konsekwencje przyjęcia modelowej siatki ATPOL jako odwzorowania stożkowego de�niującego konwersję współrzędnych płaskich na elipsoidę WGS 84 (�eoretical analysis and practical consequences of adopting the ATPOL model mesh as a cone projection de�ning the conversion of plane coordinates to the WGS ellipsoid 84). Fragmenta Floristica et Geobotanica Polonica, 24(2), 469–488. [In Polish] Zając, A. (1978). Założenia metodyczne atlasu rozmieszczenia roślin naczyniowych w Polsce (Methodolog- ical assumptions of the atlas of the distribution of vascular plants in Poland). Wiadomości Botaniczne, 22(3), 144–145. [In Polish] Zając, A., Zając, M. (2001). Atlas rozmieszczenia roślin naczyniowych w Polsce (Distribution of vascular plants in Poland). Kraków: Pracownia Chorologii Komputerowej, Instytut Botaniki Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego. [In Polish] Zając, A., Zając, M. (2019). Atlas rozmieszczenia roślin naczyniowych w Polsce (Dodatek Distribution of vascular plants in Poland: Appendix). Kraków: Pracownia Chorologii Komputerowej, Instytut Botaniki Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego. A nn a S oł ty s- Le le k, W oj ci ec h G ru sz ka 36 Zieliński, J. (1985). Studia nad rodzajem Rosa L. – systematyka sekcji Caninae DC. em Christ (Studies on the genus Rosa L. – systematics of the section Caninae DC. em Christ). Arboretum Kórnickie, 30, 3–109. [In Polish] Zieliński, J. (1987). Rosa L. In: A. Jasiewicz (ed.), Flora of Poland, 5, 48 pp. Kraków: Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences, 5. R oses and haw thorns in an urban area: a case study of G orzów W ielkopolski in P oland (N W P oland) 37 Appendix 1 a) Stands of Crataegus species Crataegus monogyna var. monogyna 1. AC5771 (52°46ʹ02,4ʺ 15°09ʹ43,6ʺ) 2. AC5775 (52°46ʹ04,4ʺ 15°13ʹ23,2ʺ) 3. AC5781 (52°45ʹ41,4ʺ 15°09ʹ45,5ʺ) 4. AC5784 (52°45ʹ29,2ʺ 15°12ʹ41,1ʺ; 52°45ʹ38,7ʺ 15°12ʹ58,5ʺ) 5. AC5785 (52°45ʹ43,5ʺ 15°13ʹ27,7ʺ) 6. AC5786 (52°45ʹ26,1ʺ 15°14ʹ15,3ʺ) 7. AC5788 (52°45ʹ34,9ʺ 15°16ʹ33,0ʺ; 52°45ʹ43,2ʺ 15°16ʹ36,2ʺ; 52°45ʹ56,4ʺ 15°15ʹ58,1ʺ) 8. AC5789 (52°45ʹ31,7ʺ 15°14ʹ19,2ʺ) 9. AC5793 (52°44ʹ58,6ʺ 15°11ʹ42,8ʺ; 52°45ʹ09,6ʺ 15°12ʹ17,3ʺ) 10. AC5794 (52°45ʹ14,8ʺ 15°12ʹ34,8ʺ; 52°45ʹ16,1ʺ 15°12ʹ45,1ʺ) 11. AC5795 (52°45ʹ06,5ʺ 15°13ʹ30,6ʺ; 52°45ʹ23,9ʺ 15°13ʹ42,0ʺ) 12. AC5796 (52°45ʹ05,0ʺ 15°14ʹ17,0ʺ) 13. AC5797 (52°45ʹ12,5ʺ 15°15ʹ10,4ʺ; 52°45ʹ19,2ʺ 15°15ʹ21,3ʺ; 52°45ʹ20,8ʺ 15°15ʹ22,0ʺ) 14. AC5798 (52°45ʹ24,2ʺ 15°15ʹ58,1ʺ; 52°45ʹ25,4ʺ 15°16ʹ40,4ʺ) 15. AC6608 (52°44ʹ34,3ʺ 15°07ʹ56,9ʺ) 16. AC6629 (52°43ʹ20,5ʺ 15°08ʹ21,3ʺ) 17. AC6639 (52°42ʹ40,3ʺ 15°08ʹ46,5ʺ) 18. AC6700 (52°44ʹ17,7ʺ 15°09ʹ44,3ʺ; 52°44ʹ35,6ʺ 15°09ʹ18,2ʺ) 19. AC6703 (52°44ʹ22,0ʺ 15°12ʹ25,5ʺ; 52°44ʹ40,2ʺ 15°12ʹ02,4ʺ; 52°44ʹ44,5ʺ 15°12ʹ15,5ʺ) 20. AC6704 (52°44ʹ32,3ʺ 15°12ʹ39,7ʺ; 52°44ʹ45,3ʺ 15°12ʹ26,3ʺ; 52°44ʹ46,2ʺ 15°13ʹ16,5ʺ; 52°44ʹ46,3ʺ 15°12ʹ32,0ʺ) 21. AC6705 (52°44ʹ42,8ʺ 15°14ʹ07,0ʺ) 21. AC6706 (52°44ʹ47,7ʺ 15°14ʹ24,6ʺ) 22. AC6708 (52°44ʹ45,5ʺ 15°16ʹ24,1ʺ; 52°44ʹ51,6ʺ 15°16ʹ34,1ʺ) 23. AC6711 (52°44ʹ02,6ʺ 15°10ʹ28,9ʺ) 24. AC6712 (52°43ʹ54,1ʺ 15°11ʹ11,3ʺ; 52°43ʹ54,5ʺ 15°10ʹ43,0ʺ; 52°43ʹ55,1ʺ 15°11ʹ23,6ʺ; 52°43ʹ57,2ʺ 15°11ʹ34,6ʺ; 52°44ʹ00,3ʺ 15°11ʹ17,3ʺ) 25. AC6715 (52°44ʹ01,4ʺ 15°13ʹ37,8ʺ; 52°44ʹ04,4ʺ 15°13ʹ35,8ʺ; 52°44ʹ06,6ʺ 15°13ʹ36,6ʺ) 27. AC6716 (52°44ʹ00,0ʺ 15°15ʹ00,4ʺ; 52°44ʹ09,4ʺ 15°14ʹ52,3ʺ; 52°44ʹ19,1ʺ 15°14ʹ47,3ʺ) 28. AC6717 (52°44ʹ03,7ʺ 15°15ʹ57,8ʺ) 29. AC6718 (52°44ʹ20,3ʺ 15°16ʹ50,2ʺ) 30. AC6719 (52°44ʹ05,7ʺ 15°16ʹ57,4ʺ) 31. AC6722 (52°43ʹ24,8ʺ 15°11ʹ04,9ʺ; 52°43ʹ26,8ʺ 15°11ʹ01,0ʺ) A nn a S oł ty s- Le le k, W oj ci ec h G ru sz ka 38 32. AC6723 (52°43ʹ28,7ʺ 15°11ʹ39,6ʺ; 52°43ʹ42,1ʺ 15°11ʹ39,4ʺ) 33. AC6724 (52°43ʹ40,3ʺ 15°13ʹ07,1ʺ) 34. AC6727 (52°43ʹ22,8ʺ 15°15ʹ13,4ʺ) 35. AC6730 (52°42ʹ49,9ʺ 15°09ʹ06,0ʺ) 36. AC6731 (52°42ʹ41,9ʺ 15°10ʹ06,4ʺ; 52°42ʹ44,0ʺ 15°09ʹ59,4ʺ; 52°42ʹ44,8ʺ 15°10ʹ04,1ʺ) 37. AC6732 (52°43ʹ04,9ʺ 15°10ʹ54,2ʺ) 38. AC6736 (52°42ʹ47,9ʺ 15°14ʹ34,0ʺ; 52°43ʹ00,0ʺ 15°14ʹ37,6ʺ) 39. AC6739 (52°42ʹ50,7ʺ 15°17ʹ52,3ʺ) 40. AC6747 (52°42ʹ22,8ʺ 15°15ʹ37,8ʺ) 41. AC6749 (52°42ʹ40,1ʺ 15°17ʹ26,5ʺ) 42. AC6754 (52°41ʹ58,2ʺ 15°13ʹ14,4ʺ) 43. AC6756 (52°42ʹ00,7ʺ 15°14ʹ46,3ʺ) 44. AC6757 (52°42ʹ00,4ʺ 15°15ʹ47,5ʺ) 45. AC6769 (52°41ʹ40,6ʺ 15°17ʹ14,8ʺ) C. rhipidophylla var. rhipidophylla 46. AC5776 (52°46ʹ13,0ʺ 15°14ʹ07,3ʺ) 47. AC6619 (52°44ʹ09,0ʺ 15°08ʹ36,4ʺ) 48. AC6712 (52°44ʹ08,6ʺ 15°11ʹ25,0ʺ) C. ×media notha var. media 49. AC6729 (52°43ʹ52,8ʺ 15°17ʹ45,5ʺ) C. ×macrocarpa notha var. macrocarpa 50. AC5793 (52°45ʹ09,7ʺ 15°12ʹ13,7ʺ) 51. AC6745 (52°42ʹ13,8ʺ 15°14ʹ06,7ʺ) C. ×subsphaericea notha var. subsphaericea 52. AC5775 (52°46ʹ02,7ʺ 15°13ʹ44,9ʺ; 52°46ʹ16,5ʺ 15°13ʹ57,6ʺ) 53. AC5784 (52°45ʹ26,4ʺ 15°12ʹ45,8ʺ) 54. AC5788 (52°45ʹ57,1ʺ 15°16ʹ07,9ʺ) 55. AC5793 (52°45ʹ09,0ʺ 15°12ʹ19,7ʺ) 56. AC5796 (52°45ʹ02,7ʺ 15°14ʹ41,7ʺ) 57. AC6629 (52°43ʹ32,2ʺ 15°08ʹ33,4ʺ) 58. AC6701 (52°44ʹ16,9ʺ 15°10ʹ38,1ʺ) 59. AC6709 (52°44ʹ36,3ʺ 15°17ʹ03,0ʺ) 60. AC6712 (52°43ʹ54,5ʺ 15°10ʹ55,9ʺ) 61. AC6713 (52°44ʹ03,7ʺ 15°12ʹ07,4ʺ; 52°43ʹ48,7ʺ 15°12ʹ27,4ʺ) R oses and haw thorns in an urban area: a case study of G orzów W ielkopolski in P oland (N W P oland) 39 62. AC6714 (52°43ʹ55,0ʺ 15°13ʹ02,8ʺ; 52°43ʹ52,2ʺ 15°12ʹ44,6ʺ) 63. AC6722 (52°43ʹ24,2ʺ 15°11ʹ11,7ʺ) 64. AC6722 (52°43ʹ26,0ʺ 15°11ʹ23,8ʺ) 65. AC6724 (52°43ʹ40,3ʺ 15°12ʹ35,8ʺ) 66. AC6745 (52°42ʹ14,6ʺ 15°14ʹ07,4ʺ) 67. AC6747 (52°42ʹ30,2ʺ 15°15ʹ20,7ʺ) b) Stands of Rosa species Rosa canina var. andegavensis 1. AC5785 (52°45ʹ34,0ʺ 15°13ʹ43,3ʺ) 2. AC5795 (52°45ʹ06,5ʺ 15°13ʹ30,6ʺ) 3. AC6718 (52°44ʹ09,3ʺ 15°16ʹ13,7ʺ) 4. AC6757 (52°41ʹ54,7ʺ 15°16ʹ08,0ʺ) Rosa canina var. canina 5. AC5775 (52°46ʹ04,4ʺ 15°13ʹ23,2ʺ) 6. AC5794 52°45ʹ17,2ʺ 15°12ʹ44,0ʺ) 7. AC5797 (52°45ʹ16,8ʺ 15°15ʹ13,7ʺ) 8. AC6704 (52°44ʹ46,1ʺ 15°12ʹ26,4ʺ) 9. AC6706 (52°44ʹ49,5ʺ 15°14ʹ22,8ʺ) 10. AC6712 (52°43ʹ58,2ʺ 15°11ʹ29,9ʺ) 11. AC6715 (52°43ʹ58,7ʺ 15°13ʹ35,5ʺ) 12. AC6724 (52°43ʹ46,4ʺ 15°13ʹ22,0ʺ; 52°43ʹ43,5ʺ 15°12ʹ32,4ʺ) Rosa canina var. corymbifera 13. AC5771 (52°46ʹ02,4ʺ 15°09ʹ43,6ʺ) 14. AC5793 (52°44ʹ53,3ʺ 15°11ʹ31,9ʺ; 52°44ʹ58,6ʺ 15°11ʹ42,8ʺ; 52°45ʹ09,6ʺ 15°12ʹ17,3ʺ) 15. AC5794 (52°44ʹ51,4ʺ 15°13ʹ09,3ʺ) 16. AC5798 (52°45ʹ24,2ʺ 15°15ʹ58,1ʺ) 17. AC6609 (52°44ʹ32,1ʺ 15°08ʹ0,09ʺ) 18. AC6701 (52°44ʹ16,9ʺ 15°10ʹ36,1ʺ; 52°44ʹ16,9ʺ 15°10ʹ38,1ʺ) 19. AC6702 (52°44ʹ18,3ʺ 15°11ʹ24,2ʺ) 20. AC6703 (52°44ʹ40,6ʺ 15°11ʹ48,4ʺ; 52°44ʹ40,4ʺ 15°12ʹ18,3ʺ) 21. AC6705 (52°44ʹ44,2ʺ 15°13ʹ23,9ʺ) 22. AC6707 (52°44ʹ26,7ʺ 15°15ʹ19,1ʺ; 52°44ʹ36,6ʺ 15°15ʹ31,6ʺ) 23. AC6712 (52°43ʹ54,5ʺ 15°10ʹ55,9ʺ; 52°43ʹ58,1ʺ 15°11ʹ18,6ʺ) 24. AC6714 (52°43ʹ45,5ʺ 15°12ʹ30,4ʺ) 25. AC6715 (52°44ʹ03,1ʺ 15°13ʹ25,8ʺ; 52°43ʹ54,2ʺ 15°13ʹ28,4ʺ) A nn a S oł ty s- Le le k, W oj ci ec h G ru sz ka 40 26. AC6721 (52°43ʹ32,7ʺ 15°10ʹ38,9ʺ) 27. AC6722 (52°43ʹ20,4ʺ 15°11ʹ33,7ʺ) 28. AC6725 (52°43ʹ37,4ʺ 15°13ʹ47,3ʺ) 29. AC6730 (52°42ʹ58,9ʺ 15°09ʹ52,1ʺ) 30. AC6731 (52°42ʹ44,7ʺ 15°10ʹ27,8ʺ) 31. AC6747 (52°42ʹ30,2ʺ 15°15ʹ31,8ʺ) Rosa canina var. deseglisei 32. AC6709 (52°44ʹ38,8ʺ 15°17ʹ03,3ʺ) 33. AC6714 (52°43ʹ48,2ʺ 15°13ʹ02,9ʺ) Rosa canina var. dumalis 34. AC5699 (52°44ʹ48,1ʺ 15°08ʹ18,1ʺ) 35. AC5776 (52°46ʹ13,0ʺ 15°14ʹ07,3ʺ; 52°46ʹ04,2ʺ 15°14ʹ35,1ʺ) 36. AC5778 (52°46ʹ03,0ʺ 15°15ʹ57,9ʺ) 37. AC5781 (52°45ʹ41,5ʺ 15°09ʹ45,7ʺ) 38. AC5784 (52°45ʹ29,2ʺ 15°12ʹ41,1ʺ; 52°45ʹ26,4ʺ 15°12ʹ45,8ʺ; 52°45ʹ38,7ʺ 15°12ʹ58,5ʺ) 39. AC5785 (52°45ʹ43,5ʺ 15°13ʹ27,7ʺ) 40. AC5786 (52°45ʹ42,7ʺ 15°14ʹ58,0ʺ) 41. AC5788 (52°45ʹ56,4ʺ 15°15ʹ58,1ʺ; 52°45ʹ59,3ʺ 15°16ʹ19,1ʺ; 52°45ʹ35,6ʺ 15°16ʹ45,7ʺ; 52°45ʹ57,1ʺ 15°16ʹ07,9ʺ; 52°45ʹ34,9ʺ 15°16ʹ33,0ʺ) 42. AC5792 (52°44ʹ51,1ʺ 15°10ʹ58,8ʺ) 43. AC5794 (52°44ʹ50,5ʺ 15°12ʹ23,8ʺ; 52°45ʹ14,8ʺ 15°12ʹ34,8ʺ) 44. AC5795 (52°44ʹ59,4ʺ 15°13ʹ43,2ʺ; 52°45ʹ05,1ʺ 15°13ʹ24,0ʺ; 52°45ʹ19,7ʺ 15°13ʹ20,4ʺ; 52°45ʹ20,8ʺ 15°13ʹ14,7ʺ) 45. AC5796 (52°45ʹ08,4ʺ 15°14ʹ18,9ʺ) 46. AC5797 (52°45ʹ17,9ʺ 15°15ʹ49,5ʺ; 52°45ʹ09,6ʺ 15°15ʹ19,8ʺ) 47. AC5798 (52°45ʹ24,5ʺ 15°16ʹ23,6ʺ; 52°45ʹ14,0ʺ 15°16ʹ48,4ʺ; 52°45ʹ24,2ʺ 15°15ʹ58,1ʺ; 52°45ʹ28,8ʺ 15°16ʹ40,8ʺ; 52°45ʹ24,9ʺ 15°16ʹ37,6ʺ) 48. AC6608 (52°44ʹ34,3ʺ 15°07ʹ56,9ʺ) 49. AC6609 (52°44ʹ32,1ʺ 15°08ʹ0,09ʺ) 50. AC6619 (52°43ʹ57,2ʺ 15°08ʹ42,8ʺ) 51. AC6629 (52°43ʹ20,5ʺ 15°08ʹ21,3ʺ; 52°43ʹ32,2ʺ 15°08ʹ33,4ʺ) 52. AC6700 (52°44ʹ35,6ʺ 15°09ʹ18,2ʺ) 53. AC6701 (52°44ʹ16,9ʺ 15°10ʹ36,1ʺ; 52°44ʹ16,9ʺ 15°10ʹ38,1ʺ) 54. AC6702 (52°44ʹ43,0ʺ 15°11ʹ29,4ʺ) 55. AC6703 (52°44ʹ29,9ʺ 15°11ʹ48,2ʺ; 52°44ʹ37,1ʺ 15°12ʹ19,8ʺ; 52°44ʹ18,3ʺ 15°11ʹ38,1ʺ; 52°44ʹ33,8ʺ 15°12ʹ18,3ʺ) R oses and haw thorns in an urban area: a case study of G orzów W ielkopolski in P oland (N W P oland) 41 56. AC6704 (52°44ʹ31,0ʺ 15°12ʹ31,6ʺ) 57. AC6705 (52°44ʹ42,4ʺ 15°14ʹ04,6ʺ; 52°44ʹ44,2ʺ 15°13ʹ26,4ʺ; 52°44ʹ24,0ʺ 15°13ʹ50,9ʺ; 52°44ʹ41,9ʺ 15°13ʹ58,7ʺ; 52°44ʹ42,8ʺ 15°14ʹ07,0ʺ; 52°44ʹ45,8ʺ 15°13ʹ43,4ʺ) 58. AC6706 (52°44ʹ50,1ʺ 15°14ʹ44,9ʺ) 59. AC6707 (52°44ʹ33,4ʺ 15°15ʹ13,8ʺ; 52°44ʹ40,4ʺ 15°15ʹ12,1ʺ) 60. AC6708 (52°44ʹ31,1ʺ 15°16ʹ09,0ʺ; 52°44ʹ35,8ʺ 15°16ʹ29,8ʺ; 52°44ʹ51,6ʺ 15°16ʹ34,1ʺ) 61. AC6710 (52°44ʹ11,0ʺ 15°09ʹ38,8ʺ; 52°44ʹ05,6ʺ 15°09ʹ27,9ʺ) 62. AC6711 (52°44ʹ08,9ʺ 15°10ʹ25,3ʺ) 63. AC6712 (52°43ʹ58,9ʺ 15°10ʹ47,3ʺ; 52°44ʹ00,3ʺ 15°11ʹ17,3ʺ; 52°43ʹ52,7ʺ 15°11ʹ09,1ʺ; 52°43ʹ51,4ʺ 15°11ʹ22,2ʺ) 64. AC6713 (52°44ʹ03,7ʺ 15°12ʹ07,4ʺ; 52°43ʹ58,8ʺ 15°12ʹ21,9ʺ; 52°44ʹ06,1ʺ 15°12ʹ26,5ʺ; 52°44ʹ08,8ʺ 15°12ʹ03,5ʺ; 52°44ʹ03,0ʺ 15°12ʹ02,9ʺ) 65. AC6714 (52°43ʹ55,1ʺ 15°12ʹ59,0ʺ; 52°43ʹ53,6ʺ 15°13ʹ01,0ʺ; 52°43ʹ51,8ʺ 15°12ʹ44,2ʺ; 52°43ʹ51,9ʺ 15°12ʹ44,4ʺ; 52°44ʹ10,9ʺ 15°13ʹ05,3ʺ) 66. AC6715 (52°44ʹ06,6ʺ 15°13ʹ36,6ʺ; 52°44ʹ02,7ʺ 15°13ʹ24,8ʺ; 52°44ʹ04,6ʺ 15°13ʹ34,6ʺ; 52°43ʹ54,4ʺ 15°13ʹ55,4ʺ) 67. AC6716 (52°43ʹ51,0ʺ 15°14ʹ35,5ʺ; 52°44ʹ15,3ʺ 15°14ʹ52,8ʺ) 68. AC6717 (52°44ʹ06,2ʺ 15°15ʹ28,6ʺ) 69. AC6718 (52°44ʹ13,1ʺ 15°16ʹ26,0ʺ; 52°44ʹ05,1ʺ 15°16ʹ11,2ʺ; 52°44ʹ16,4ʺ 15°16ʹ37,1ʺ; 52°44ʹ11,9ʺ 15°16ʹ45,9ʺ) 70. AC6719 (52°44ʹ10,7ʺ 15°16ʹ55,2ʺ) 71. AC6721 (52°43ʹ13,8ʺ 15°10ʹ29,5ʺ; 52°43ʹ37,5ʺ 15°10ʹ36,5ʺ) 72. AC6722 (52°43ʹ26,8ʺ 15°10ʹ56,0ʺ; 52°43ʹ15,7ʺ 15°11ʹ06,5ʺ; 52°43ʹ29,6ʺ 15°11ʹ03,8ʺ; 52°43ʹ21,5ʺ 15°11ʹ08,2ʺ; 52°43ʹ22,6ʺ 15°11ʹ08,8ʺ; 52°43ʹ36,4ʺ 15°11ʹ05,4ʺ; 52°43ʹ36,1ʺ 15°10ʹ57,7ʺ) 73. AC6723 (52°43ʹ28,7ʺ 15°11ʹ39,6ʺ; 52°43ʹ33,7ʺ 15°11ʹ52,3ʺ; 52°43ʹ33,1ʺ 15°12ʹ21,0ʺ; 52°43ʹ39,5ʺ 15°12ʹ12,3ʺ) 74. AC6724 (52°43ʹ40,9ʺ 15°13ʹ06,5ʺ; 52°43ʹ36,1ʺ 15°12ʹ35,5ʺ; 52°43ʹ40,7ʺ 15°12ʹ36,1ʺ) 75. AC6727 (52°43ʹ39,6ʺ 15°15ʹ15,3ʺ; 52°43ʹ26,9ʺ 15°15ʹ34,5ʺ; 52°43ʹ24,1ʺ 15°15ʹ16,4ʺ) 76. AC6729 (52°43ʹ52,8ʺ 15°17ʹ45,5ʺ) 77. AC6730 (52°42ʹ49,9ʺ 15°09ʹ06,0ʺ) 78. AC6731 (52°42ʹ44,7ʺ 15°10ʹ27,8ʺ; 52°42ʹ44,8ʺ 15°10ʹ04,1ʺ; 52°42ʹ44,0ʺ 15°09ʹ59,4ʺ; 52°42ʹ41,9ʺ 15°10ʹ06,2ʺ) 79. AC6732 (52°43ʹ05,4ʺ 15°10ʹ55,1ʺ) 80. AC6733 (52°43ʹ10,5ʺ 15°12ʹ24,5ʺ) A nn a S oł ty s- Le le k, W oj ci ec h G ru sz ka 42 81. AC6736 (52°43ʹ16,7ʺ 15°14ʹ54,2ʺ; 52°42ʹ51,9ʺ 15°14ʹ39,7ʺ; 52°42ʹ51,9ʺ 15°15ʹ11,3ʺ; 52°42ʹ58,0ʺ 15°15ʹ12,8ʺ; 52°42ʹ47,3ʺ 15°14ʹ25,4ʺ) 82. AC6737 (52°42ʹ57,7ʺ 15°15ʹ17,4ʺ) 83. AC6745 (52°42ʹ15,1ʺ 15°14ʹ08,5ʺ) 84. AC6746 (52°42ʹ29,5ʺ 15°14ʹ22,9ʺ; 52°42ʹ35,5ʺ 15°15ʹ15,1ʺ) 85. AC6747 (52°42ʹ30,2ʺ 15°15ʹ31,8ʺ; 52°42ʹ22,0ʺ 15°15ʹ19,6ʺ; 52°42ʹ30,2ʺ 15°15ʹ20,7ʺ) 86. AC6756 (52°42ʹ00,7ʺ 15°14ʹ46,3ʺ;52°42ʹ08,4ʺ 15°14ʹ42,6ʺ) 87. AC6758 (52°41ʹ44,0ʺ 15°16ʹ44,4ʺ) 88. AC6765 (52°41ʹ36,6ʺ 15°13ʹ41,1ʺ) 89. AC6766 (52°41ʹ27,9ʺ 15°14ʹ59,3ʺ) 91. AC6769 (52°41ʹ40,4ʺ 15°17ʹ21,6ʺ) Rosa canina × R. rubiginosa 92. AC6703 (52°44ʹ18,3ʺ 15°11ʹ35,6ʺ) Rosa dumalis var. acharii 93. AC6715 (52°44ʹ06,6ʺ 15°13ʹ34,6ʺ) Rosa dumalis var. afzeliana 94. AC5793 (52°45ʹ09,0ʺ 15°12ʹ19,7ʺ) 95. AC5794 (52°45ʹ16,7ʺ 15°12ʹ44,4ʺ; 52°45ʹ17,7ʺ 15°12ʹ52,1ʺ) 96. AC6713 (52°43ʹ59,6ʺ 15°11ʹ51,4ʺ) 97. AC6717 (52°44ʹ00,2ʺ 15°15ʹ36,2ʺ) 98. AC6722 (52°43ʹ19,9ʺ 15°11ʹ21,2ʺ) 99. AC6725 (52°43ʹ31,1ʺ 15°14ʹ04,6ʺ) 100. AC6736 (52°43ʹ11,2ʺ 15°14ʹ30,6ʺ) 101. AC6746 (52°42ʹ43,5ʺ 15°14ʹ35,3ʺ) 102. AC6747 (52°42ʹ14,8ʺ 15°15ʹ41,8ʺ) Rosa dumalis var. caballicensis 103. AC5793 (52°44ʹ53,3ʺ 15°11ʹ31,9ʺ) Rosa dumalis var. coriifolia 104. AC5776 (52°46ʹ03,7ʺ 15°14ʹ40,1ʺ) 105. AC6724 (52°43ʹ13,4ʺ 15°12ʹ46,1ʺ) 106. AC6736 (52°42ʹ57,9ʺ 15°14ʹ41,4ʺ) R oses and haw thorns in an urban area: a case study of G orzów W ielkopolski in P oland (N W P oland) 43 Rosa dumalis var. dumalis 107. AC5797 (52°44ʹ58,8ʺ 15°15ʹ18,0ʺ) 108. AC6639 (52°42ʹ39,4ʺ 15°08ʹ47,2ʺ) 109. AC6703 (52°44ʹ30,2ʺ 15°12ʹ12,4ʺ) 110. AC6712 (52°43ʹ48,3ʺ 15°11ʹ21,6ʺ) 111. AC6714 (52°44ʹ13,5ʺ 15°13ʹ05,2ʺ) 112. AC6715 (52°44ʹ06,6ʺ 15°13ʹ36,6ʺ) 113. AC6722 (52°43ʹ26,8ʺ 15°10ʹ56,0ʺ; 52°43ʹ26,8ʺ 15°11ʹ01,0ʺ) 114. AC6723 (52°43ʹ33,1ʺ 15°12ʹ13,4ʺ) 115. AC6731 (52°42ʹ41,5ʺ 15°10ʹ07,1ʺ) 116. AC6749 (52°42ʹ31,9ʺ 15°17ʹ26,4ʺ) 117. AC6756 (52°42ʹ00,7ʺ 15°14ʹ46,3ʺ) Rosa inodora var. inodora 118. AC6702 (52°44ʹ17,9ʺ 15°11ʹ23,5ʺ) 119. AC6712 (52°43ʹ44,3ʺ 15°11ʹ33,5ʺ) 120. AC6731 (52°42ʹ41,4ʺ 15°10ʹ08,3ʺ) 121. AC6745 (52°42ʹ14,5ʺ 15°14ʹ06,1ʺ) Rosa jundzillii var. jundzillii 122. AC5788 (52°45ʹ35,7ʺ 15°16ʹ29,8ʺ) 123. AC5794 (52°45ʹ16,7ʺ 15°12ʹ44,4ʺ) 124. AC6722 (52°43ʹ20,7ʺ 15°11ʹ02,7ʺ) Rosa multi�ora 125. AC5793 (52°44ʹ50,5ʺ 15°12ʹ23,4ʺ) 126. AC5894 (52°45′12,2″ 15°12′27,3″) 127. AC6726 (52°43ʹ40,6ʺ 15°14ʹ42,3ʺ; 52°43′23,4″ 15°14′52,8″) 128. AC6739 (52°42ʹ50,7ʺ 15°17ʹ52,3ʺ) Rosa rubiginosa var. rubiginosa 129. AC6702 (52°44ʹ17,7ʺ 15°11ʹ12,8ʺ) Rosa rubiginosa var. umbellata 130. AC5795 (52°45ʹ23,7ʺ 15°13ʹ43,2ʺ) 131. AC6703 (52°44ʹ19,8ʺ 15°12ʹ22,6ʺ; 52°44ʹ27,2ʺ 15°12ʹ13,9ʺ; 52°44ʹ27,2ʺ 15°12ʹ13,4ʺ; 52°44ʹ30,2ʺ 15°12ʹ12,4ʺ) 132. AC6704 (52°44ʹ46,3ʺ 15°12ʹ32,0ʺ; 52°44ʹ44,1ʺ 15°12ʹ44,0ʺ) 133. AC6712 (52°43ʹ55,1ʺ 15°11ʹ23,6ʺ) 134. AC6757 (52°41ʹ49,5ʺ 15°15ʹ54,3ʺ) A nn a S oł ty s- Le le k, W oj ci ec h G ru sz ka 44 Rosa rugosa 135. AC5788 (52°45′33,5″ 15°16′41,1; 52°45′39,9″ 15°16′40,7″) 136. AC6716 (52°44′17,4″ 15°14′48,7″) 137. AC6731 (52°42′43,6″ 15°10′02,2″) 138. AC6732 (52°43′03,5″ 15°10′52,4″) Rosa sherardii var. collivaga 139. AC6714 (52°43ʹ52,2ʺ 15°12ʹ44,6ʺ) Rosa sherardii var. sherardii 140. AC6703 (52°44ʹ18,3ʺ 15°11ʹ38,1ʺ) 141. AC6747 (52°42ʹ32,2ʺ 15°15ʹ30,3ʺ) 142. AC6756 (52°42ʹ05,4ʺ 15°14ʹ32,6ʺ) Rosa tomentosa var. cinerscens 143. AC6736 (52°43ʹ07,9ʺ 15°14ʹ31,8ʺ) Rosa villosa var. villosa 144. AC5788 (52°45ʹ31,7ʺ 15°16ʹ44,2ʺ) Rosa ×francofourtana 145. AC6756 (52°42ʹ08,4ʺ 15°14ʹ42,6ʺ) Rosa ×subcollina 146. AC6707 (52°44ʹ32,4ʺ 15°15ʹ30,1ʺ) 147. AC6712 (52°43ʹ52,7ʺ 15°11ʹ9,1ʺ) 148. AC6722 (52°43ʹ20,6ʺ 15°11ʹ34,4ʺ) 149. AC6736 (52°43ʹ07,5ʺ 15°14ʹ31,1ʺ; 52°43ʹ00,7ʺ 15°14ʹ32,8ʺ) Rosa ×subcanina 150. AC5795 (52°44ʹ53,7ʺ 15°13ʹ42,3ʺ) 151. AC5796 (52°45ʹ02,5ʺ 15°14ʹ55,2ʺ) 152. AC5797 (52°45ʹ01,6ʺ 15°15ʹ21,6ʺ) 153. AC5798 (52°45ʹ22,9ʺ 15°16ʹ36,8ʺ) 154. AC5799 (52°45ʹ17,2ʺ 15°16ʹ51,4ʺ) 155. AC6629 (52°43ʹ27,9ʺ 15°08ʹ29,3ʺ) 156. AC6703 (52°44ʹ21,0ʺ 15°12ʹ23,3ʺ) 157. AC6705 (52°44ʹ46,6ʺ 15°13ʹ43,4ʺ) 158. AC6708 (52°44ʹ45,5ʺ 15°16ʹ24,1ʺ) R oses and haw thorns in an urban area: a case study of G orzów W ielkopolski in P oland (N W P oland) 45 159. AC6711 (52°44ʹ00,2ʺ 15°10ʹ25,7ʺ) 160. AC6717 (52°44ʹ19,7ʺ 15°15ʹ56,1ʺ) 161. AC6718 (52°44ʹ09,7ʺ 15°16ʹ22,4ʺ) 162. AC6722 (52°43ʹ24,2ʺ 15°11ʹ11,7ʺ) 163. AC6724 (52°43ʹ36,8ʺ 15°12ʹ37,6ʺ) 164. AC6736 (52°42ʹ55,0ʺ 15°14ʹ21,7ʺ) 165. AC6746 (52°42ʹ31,7ʺ 15°14ʹ29,0ʺ) A nn a S oł ty s- Le le k, W oj ci ec h G ru sz ka 46 Appendix 2 Fig. 3. Rosa jundzillii Besler var. jundzillii, specimen from Poland, Gorzów Wielkopolski city, Zwiadowców Street (A); Rosa ×francofourtana Muenchh., specimen from Poland, Gorzów Wielkopolski city, Podgórna Street (B) (Photo. 2018, W. Gruszka) R oses and haw thorns in an urban area: a case study of G orzów W ielkopolski in P oland (N W P oland) 47 Abstract �is paper presents the distribution of species of the genera Crataegus and Rosa in Gorzów Wielkopolski, Poland. Based on literature data and �eld research, 25 taxa were found to occur here, comprising 11 haw- thorn species and 14 rose taxa. Among the taxa of hawthorns, 6 were native taxa belonging to 2 subseries Erianthae and Crataegus, and 5 were classi�ed as cultivated ornamental taxa. Among the taxa of genus Rosa L., there were 10 native species (including 2 native hybrid forms at the rank of species), 2 anthropophytes, 1 cultivated species, and 1 hybrid form. Among those identi�ed, as many as 13 taxa were new to the �ora of Gorzów Wielkopolski. �ese were Crataegus ×macrocarpa, C. ×subsphaericea, C. ×media, Rosa dumalis, R. villosa, R. sherardii, R. tomentosa, R. inodora, R. jundzillii, R. ×subcanina, R. ×subcollina, the old, cultivated variety R. ×francofourtana, and an interspeci�c hybrid Rosa canina × R. rubiginosa. �e occurrence of Rosa jundzillii, a species rare in Poland and not previously reported in the Gorzów Upland, was noted during the study. �e following varieties of roses that are rare in Poland were also found: R. dumalis var. acharii, R. dumalis var. caballicensis, R. canina var. andegavensis, and R. canina var. deseglisei. �is study showed that although the city area is strongly transformed by man, there is a high diversity of taxa of the studied genera. Key words: Crataegus, distribution of critical species, list of species, Poland, Rosa, Rosaceae Received: [2021.09.02] Accepted: [2021.11.02] Róże i głogi obszarów zurbanizowanych: na przykładzie Gorzowa Wielkopolskiego (NW Poland) Streszczenie W artykule przedstawiono rozmieszczenie gatunków z rodzajów Crataegus i Rosa na obszarze Gorzowa Wielkopolskiego. Na podstawie danych z bibliogra�i oraz badań własnych stwierdzono tu występowanie 25 taksonów, w tym: 11 gatunków głogów i 14 taksonów róż. Spośród głogów, 6 taksonów to gatunki rodzi- me, należące do subserii Erianthae i Crataegus, a 5 zaliczanych jest do hodowlanych taksonów ozdobnych. Spośród gatunków rodzaju Rosa, 10 to rodzime elementy �ory (w tym 2 formy mieszańcowe ujęte w randze gatunku), a wśród pozostałych 2 antropo�ty: 1 tzw. starą odmianę hodowlaną i 1 formę mieszańcową. Wśród odnotowanych taksonów, aż 13 jest nowych dla �ory miasta Gorzowa Wielkopolskiego: Crataegus ×macrocarpa, C. ×subsphaericea, C. ×media, Rosa dumalis, R. villosa, R. sherardii, R. tomentosa, R. inodora, R. jundzillii, R. ×subcanina, R. ×subcollina oraz stara odmiana hodowlana R. ×francofourtana i mieszaniec międzygatunkowy Rosa canina × R. rubiginosa. W trakcie badań odnotowano tutaj występowanie rzadkiego w Polsce gatunku Rosa jundzillii, który z Wyżyny Gorzowskiej nie był do tej pory podawany. Znaleziono także rzadkie w Polsce odmiany róż, jak: dla Rosa dumalis: R. dumalis var. acharii i R. dumalis var. caballi- censis oraz dla Rosa canina: R. canina var. andegavensis i R. canina var. deseglisei. Przeprowadzone badania wykazały, iż pomimo że obszar miasta jest terenem silenie przekształconym przez człowieka, to występuje tu duże zróżnicowanie taksonów z analizowanych rodzajów. Słowa kluczowe: Crataegus, rozmieszczenie gatunków krytycznych, lista gatunków, Polska, Rosaceae, Rosa Information on the authors Anna Soltys-Lelek https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9595-3167 Author of numerous scienti�c and popular science studies in the �eld of botany and environmental protec- tion. Her research interests relate particularly to critical types of roses (Rosa) and hawthorns (Crataegus). Member of the Polish and Slovak Botanical Society. Wojciech Gruszka http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6229-8397 Author and co-author of scienti�c and popular science studies in lichenology and botany. His main rese- arch interests relate to the ecology and protection of lichens. In addition, he participates in research on the distribution of representatives of rose (Rosa) and hawthorn (Crataegus) species in Poland.