Vol49,6,2006 1157 ANNALS OF GEOPHYSICS, VOL. 49, N. 6, December 2006 Key words hydrophones – Bragg fiber-laser – pres- sure sensors 1. Introduction In the field of acoustic detection, piezoelec- tric sensors are the most widely used devices. This well established technology offers high reli- ability and relatively low cost production. Sen- sors based on optical fibers have well known ad- vantages over conventional electro-mechanical sensors. They offer electrically passive operation and immunity from electromagnetic fields, since the fiber is realized entirely with dielectric mate- rials (glass and plastic). They have very small di- mensions (outer diameter ∼125 µm for a stan- dard fiber), and have multiplexing capabilities for a quasi-distributed measurement configuration, by using a single opto-electronic control unit. Re- mote measurement is also possible. Indeed, the very low signal attenuation (∼ 0.3 dB/km) of the fibers in the region around 1.55 µm makes it pos- sible to place the opto-electronic control unit sev- eral km far from the measurement point. More- over, high sensitivity and wide dynamic meas- urement range can usually be achieved. 2. Fiber Bragg Grating sensors A Fiber Bragg Grating (FBG) consists of a periodic perturbation of the optical fiber core refractive index. This grating acts on the radia- tion traveling in the fiber as a wavelength selec- tive mirror. If the grating pitch is Λ, the reflec- tion band is peaked at a wavelength (2.1) where λBragg is the so-called Bragg wavelength and neff is the effective refractive index. The width of the reflection band can be regulated by controlling the reflectivity of the mirror, that is by controlling the length of the grating (its total number of lines) and the depth of the reflection index modulation. Typical reflection bandwidth values are around 0.2 nm. Radiation outside the Bragg resonance condition will propagate in the fiber without perturbations (fig. 1). 2nBragg effλ Λ= Developing fiber lasers with Bragg reflectors as deep sea hydrophones Nicolò Beverini (1)(3), Riccardo Falciai (2), Enrico Maccioni (1)(3), Mauro Morganti (1)(3), Fiodor Sorrentino (1) and Cosimo Trono (1)(2) (1) Dipartimento di Fisica «E. Fermi», Università degli Studi di Pisa, Italy (2) Istituto di Fisica Applicata «Nello Carrara» (IFAC), CNR, Firenze, Italy (3) Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN), Sezione di Pisa, Italy Abstract The present paper will discuss the work in progress at the Department of Physics of the University of Pisa in col- laboration with the IFAC laboratory of CNR in Florence to develop pressure sensors with outstanding sensiti- vity in the acoustic and ultrasonic ranges. These devices are based on optically-pumped fiber lasers, where the mirrors are Bragg gratings written into the fiber core. Mailing address: Dr. Nicolò Beverini, Dipartimento di Fisica «E. Fermi», Università degli Studi di Pisa, Largo Pon- tecorvo 3, 56127 Pisa, Italy; e-mail: beverini@df.unipi.it 1158 Nicolò Beverini, Riccardo Falciai, Enrico Maccioni, Mauro Morganti, Fiodor Sorrentino and Cosimo Trono FBGs are fabricated using the phase-mask technique on special Ge-doped fibers (Hill and Meltz, 1997). A phase-mask is a diffractive opti- cal element which spatially modulates the UV writing beam (typically at λ = 248 nm, where the photosensitivity of the fiber is at its best). The near-field fringe pattern, which is produced be- hind the mask, photo-imprints a refractive index modulation on the core of the photosensitive fiber. These gratings are highly sensitive to exter- nal perturbations that affect the fiber. With regard to eq. (2.1), every strain and temperature or pres- sure variation on the fiber changes both the grat- ing pitch and the refractive index, producing a shift in the Bragg wavelength (fig. 2). The infor- mation is encoded on the wavelength, with the considerable advantage that a number of differ- ent gratings, with different Bragg wavelengths, can be inscribed on the same fiber and interro- gated by the same opto-electronic unit, thus en- abling a quasi-distributed measurement. The typical sensitivities of a fiber Bragg grating to strain, temperature, and pressure (which acts as an isotropic strain) are (2.2) (: )strain n p p p1 2Bragg Bragg eff 2 12 11 12λ λ ν ε ∆ − − −= 6 @& 0 Fig. 1. Fiber Bragg grating reflection and transmission properties. Fig. 2. Strain, temperature and pressure effects on a Bragg grating reflection spectrum. 1159 Developing fiber lasers with Bragg reflectors as deep sea hydrophones (2.3) (2.4) where neff is the fiber effective refractive index, ν is Poisson’s ratio, ε=∆L/L is the strain (Bragg grating length L), pij are Pockel’s coefficients of the stress-optic tensor, αΛ is the thermal expan- sion coefficient, αn represents the thermo-optic coefficient, and E is Young’s modulus. For silica fibers, at 1550 nm the strain sensitivity is ∼1.2 pm/µε, the temperature sensitivity is ∼10 pm/°C, and the pressure sensitivity is ∼ −3.6 pm/MPa. A typical FBG sensor device includes a broad-spectrum source (i.e. a superluminescent LED with ∼ 40 nm spectral emission width). Its radiation is coupled into the fiber, and interacts with the grating. The wavelength shift of the re- flection peak is then detected by means of spectro-photometric methods. FBGs sensors are robust, can have a wide dy- namic range, and can be easily multiplexed in or- der to realize multipoint detection at a low cost. Their ultimate sensitivity is limited, however, by the spectral bandwidth of the Bragg grating which at best can be of the order of 0.2 nm. A typical application for FBG sensors is the control of deformations in structures to which the gratings can be attached or within which P∆ ( ) ( )pressure: E E n1 2 2 1 2 Bragg Bragg 2 12 11 $ λ λ ν ν ∆ − − + −= $ )p p2 +( : F ( )temperature: T Bragg Bragg λ λ α α ∆ ∆+ νΛ= they can be embedded. The following is a sum- mary of FBG sensor applications made by the IFAC group: – Applications for the cultural heritage (Cas- telli et al., 2003): in situ measurement and con- tinuous monitoring of deformations in painted wood panels. − Automotive applications: monitoring of deformations in car windshields (Falciai et al., 2004). − Structural health monitoring: FBGs em- bedded in carbon fibers in composite strips for concrete beam reinforcement and monitoring (Falciai et al., 2005). FBGs show only a limited responsivity to variations in pressure (the typical wavelength resolution of FBG interrogation systems is ∼1 pm, which means approximately 0.3 MPa, or 3 atm). Therefore, their typical application is for high pressure sensing (Xu et al.,1993). 3. Fiber lasers A Distributed Bragg Reflector Fiber Laser (DBR-FL) consists of two Bragg gratings with identical reflection wavelengths (Ball and Glenn, 1992), which are directly inscribed in a single- mode erbium-doped optical fiber (fig. 3). When pumped with 980 nm radiation, this structure acts as an active medium inserted in a Fabry-Perot laser cavity, with an emission peak around 1530 nm. The power emitted is a function of the broad- band source pumping power, the length of the laser cavity and the Bragg gratings reflectivity, Fig. 3. Fiber laser pumping scheme. 1160 Nicolò Beverini, Riccardo Falciai, Enrico Maccioni, Mauro Morganti, Fiodor Sorrentino and Cosimo Trono but it is in any case some orders of magnitude higher than the power available on the reflected radiation from a passive FBG sensors. Cavity length is an important laser parameter. The emit- ted laser power increases with the cavity length, but a shorter length means a larger separation between the resonant longitudinal modes (λ= =λ2/2L). With a cavity length of a few cm, only one cavity mode lies inside the optical bandwidth of the Bragg gratings, and it becomes possible to operate with the laser in a stable single-frequency emission mode. In these conditions the laser line- width is very narrow (<5 kHz, equivalent to a co- herence length of over 30 km). The comparison between the performances of devices using the FBG and the DBR is provided in table I. The very narrow line-width means that the DBR laser sensor is intrinsically more sensitive than the FBG sensor; for this reason, it seems particularly suitable for very low-pressure meas- urements. DBR fiber lasers were fabricated in the IFAC laboratories. An excimer (KrF) UV laser, with emission at 248 nm, was used for Bragg gratings writing. We obtained a Bragg grating with λBragg ≅ 1532 nm by a phase mask with a nominal spatial period of 1059.9 nm on an er- bium doped fiber having an absorption coeffi- cient of 14 dB/m at 980 nm. The length of Bragg gratings was 1 cm, and we chose the distance be- tween the two FBG reflectors and the FBGs re- flectivity in order to obtain the maximum power emission in stable, single longitudinal mode regime. Typical values are: output FBG reflec- tivity: > 90%; back FBG reflectivity: > 99%; distance between the FBGs: 2 mm-2 cm; emis- sion power: 10 µW-1 mW with about 200 mW of 980 nm pumping power. The laser line-width was measured by het- erodyning on a fast photodiode the beams from two different lasers with slightly different emis- sion wavelengths, and then observing the result- ing beat note on a radio-frequency spectrum an- alyzer. We could estimate a line-width narrower than 5 kHz. It is possible to inscribe several laser struc- tures on a single doped fiber with the aim of mul- tiplexing a few sensors, by working at slightly different wavelengths on the same fiber with a common pump laser. In order to test multiplexing operation, we wrote two lasers on the same opti- cal fiber with a different grating pitch. Figure 4 Fig. 4. Emission spectrum of an array of two fiber lasers. Table I. Comparison of FBG and DBR perform- ances. Power Line-width Line-width (kHz) (nm) FBG (passive) 1-100 nW ∼ 107 ∼ 0.1 DBR (active) 100 µW-1 mW ~ 5 ∼ 5⋅10−8 1161 Developing fiber lasers with Bragg reflectors as deep sea hydrophones reports the emission spectrum of this two-laser array, acquired by means of an optical spectrum analyzer (wavelength resolution: 0.1 nm). 4. Fiber laser hydrophone In developing highly sensitive hydrophones for deep sea applications, the ultimate goal is to achieve a sensitivity at the level of the acoustic background noise of the quiet ocean, which is conventionally represented by the so-called Deep Sea State Zero (DSS0) (Wenz, 1962). At 1 kHz, the DSS0 level is 100 µPa/Hz1/2, which should correspond (eq. (2.4)) to a wavelength shift of approximately 10−12 nm, 11 orders of magnitude less than the typical FBG band- width. The DBR fiber laser emits monochro- matic radiation with a line-width of approxi- mately 4⋅10−8 nm, and an interferometric detec- tion technique provides the possibility of push- ing the sensitivity a factor 103-104 below the laser line-width, thus approaching the sensitivi- ty required by the DSS0 level. Figure 5 shows the scheme of an unbalanced Mach-Zender in- terferometer (MZI), which we used in our de- tection scheme. The interferometer converts the pressure-in- duced wavelength shift of the radiation emitted by the DBR fiber laser into a phase delay. The phase difference ∆ϕMZ at the MZI output is de- pendent on the fiber laser output wavelength shift ∆λ and on the Optical Path Difference (OPD= = nL), which is the length difference L of the two interferometer arms times the fiber core refractive index n. The following relationship holds: (4.1) With λ of the order of 10−12 nm (DSS0 condi- tions), an OPD of 300 m gives a value of ϕMZ ≈ 1 µrad, which is a resolution achievable with the present technology (Kersey et al., 1992). 5. Experimental tests We made a preliminary characterization of the sensor in our laboratory and tested the re- sponsivity of our lasers by using a MZI with OPDs of 150 m and 450 m. According to eq. (4.1), the MZI responsivity increases by in- creasing the unbalance, up to the limit given by the coherence length of the laser radiation, which for these lasers consists of many km. The monotonic operative range and the dynamic range are, however, reduced proportionally. In- deed, the phase detector signal is not univocal- ly related to the wavelength shift, when the phase difference grows over 2π radians, and the low frequency noise of the laser exceeds this limit, yet with a few meter of length unbalance. We were then obliged to lock the MZI phase to the laser frequency at low Fourier frequencies, with a cut-off of the order of several kHz, by us- ing a servo loop that acts on the length of one arm of the interferometer by stretching the fiber through a piezoelectric actuator. The interfer- ometer was used in the condition usually de- fined as «quadrature» detection (Kersey et al., 1992), with the MZI locked at one side of a fringe in the middle point, where the sinusoidal function is proportional to the phase and the re- sponsivity has its maximum value. The experimental apparatus is sketched in fig. 6. The fiber laser was sink in a 1 m3 water tank, close to a conventional Piezo-Transducer (PZT) hydrophone for calibration and valida- tion; a SDR HS/150 model was used with a nominal responsivity of 1.778 mV/Pa (29 dB . OPD2 MZ 2 $ ϕ λ π λ∆ ∆= Fig. 5. The Mach-Zender Interferometer. Fig. 7. Fiber laser spectral response to a 65 KHz test tone (OPD = 150 m). Top (A): the fiber laser response (output of the MZI) to a 65 kHz loud-speaker acoustic test note. Bottom (B): the laser output spectrum (without the MZI). 1162 Nicolò Beverini, Riccardo Falciai, Enrico Maccioni, Mauro Morganti, Fiodor Sorrentino and Cosimo Trono amplification). A PZT loud-speaker provided a cw sinusoidal uncalibrated acoustic signal. The laser emission wavelength modulation, induced by the acoustic signal, was converted into phase modulation by the Mach-Zender interferome- ter, and analyzed by means of an electronic spectrum analyzer (125 Hz resolution band- width). Fig. 6. Experimental setup. 1163 Developing fiber lasers with Bragg reflectors as deep sea hydrophones Figure 7 compares the MZI output with the laser output spectrum in the absence of the in- terferometer when the fiber laser was stimulat- ed with a 65 kHz acoustic wave. From these two spectra we deduced a limit for the perform- ance of a particular FL sensor, referred to a de- vice of a specific optical power (100 µW), and a fixed orientation with respect to the acoustic source. In fact the upper base line −80 dBV/Hz1/2 level, corresponding to about 56 mPa/Hz1/2, was produced by the actual environmental noise lev- el. The bottom −118 dBV/Hz1/2 level, which cor- responds to about 0.7 mPa/Hz1/2, represented the opto-electronic noise level, and thus the lowest Fig. 8. FL output signal versus pressure (measured with the calibrated reference hydrophone). FL optical pow- er 10 µW, test note frequency 40 kHz; OPD ∼ 450 m. Error bars represent the reading uncertainty. Fig. 9. FL responsivity for different test note frequencies; OPD ~ 450m; FL optical power 10 µW. 1164 Nicolò Beverini, Riccardo Falciai, Enrico Maccioni, Mauro Morganti, Fiodor Sorrentino and Cosimo Trono attainable limit for the minimum detectable sig- nal of the fiber laser. The acoustic level in mPa was estimated by means of a comparison with the readings of a calibrated PZT hydrophone. We measured the response of the device to in-water acoustic notes at several fixed frequen- cies in the region between about 15 and 100 kHz, for different intensities of loud-speaker excitation. By making a comparison with the calibrated PZT hydrophone, we observed a highly linear trend of the FL output signal ver- sus pressure (fig. 8). In this particular experi- mental condition, we measured a responsivity of 76 mV/Pa at 40 kHz, where the voltage val- ue refers to the photodiode signal at the MZI output. The reading error bars (± 0.5 db) on the single measurement are reported. However, the responsivity is changing signif- icantly as a function of the acoustic wave fre- quency. Figure 9 reports measured responsivities for a same FL and a same Mach-Zender OPD. The large spread for the responsivity values de- pends strongly on the particular set of experimen- tal parameters. In fact, it can be affected at some specific frequencies by the acoustic reflections between the walls of the water tank, due to its re- duced dimensions. Also mechanical resonances of the fiber laser holder, and of the fiber itself, may have caused a dependence of the frequency response. Moreover, the acoustic perturbation in water may act differently on the two Bragg grat- ings of the laser, because they are spatially sepa- rated. All these factors dictate that a true charac- terization of the sensors should be made only un- der better control of experimental conditions, op- erating in a large pool and in pulsed excitation regime, in order to avoid reflection effects. In par- ticular, it will be important to study the depend- ence of the response on the orientation of the sen- sor. In any case, we can say that the pressure dy- namic range for the FL sensor set-up shown in figs. 8 and 9 is roughly of four decades. In fact, the minimum detectable pressure in this experi- mental condition is of the order of 1 mPa/ Hz1/2 at every frequency; this is, for example, the meas- ured value of the first point on fig. 8. The output voltage of the device is linear with pressure up to about 1 V, that is, up to 10 Pa with minimum re- sponsivity in the 15-100 kHz range of approxi- mately 100 mV/Pa (fig. 9). 6. Conclusions The results of the study, development and experimental validation of a DBR fiber laser for acoustic sensing in marine environment, have been reported. Single mode lasers were fabri- cated by writing two Bragg gratings on an er- bium-doped fiber core. The very narrow line- width (< 5 kHz), combined with an interfero- metric detection, could make possible a wave- length resolution of ∼ 10−12 nm. The comparison with a calibrated PZT hydrophone (15-100 kHz frequency range) showed a highly linear trend of the fiber laser output signal versus pressure. On the other hand, FL responsivity was strong- ly frequency dependent. This fact was probably connected to the particular experimental set-up, such as the acoustic reflections between the walls of the water tank and the mechanical res- onance of the FL holder and of the fiber itself. The FBG hydrophones offer a wide range of applications, ranging from the marine environ- mental acoustic monitoring to the deep-sea study and the survey of dolphins and whales. In general, a network of multiplexed FBG hy- drophones could provide much information on what happens in the «under-the-sea world» in the acoustic and ultrasound regimes, whichever could be the origin of the propagating pressure wave. An interesting field of application could be the acoustic detection of particle showers produced in water by very high-energy neutri- nos, as an alternative method to the more con- ventional photo-detection. Acknowledgements This research was supported by the Italian University Ministry (MIUR), by the University of Pisa, by National Institute of Nuclear Physics (INFN), and by the Italian National Re- search Council (CNR). REFERENCES BALL, G.A. and W.H. GLENN (1992): Design of a single- mode linear-cavity erbium fiber laser utilizing Bragg reflectors, J. Lightwave Tech., 10, 1338-1343. CASTELLI, C., G. LANTERNA, R. FALCIAI and C. TRONO 1165 Developing fiber lasers with Bragg reflectors as deep sea hydrophones (2003): Continuous monitoring of wooden works of art using fiber Bragg-grating sensors, J. Cultural Heritage, 4, 285-290. FALCIAI, R., C. TRONO, P. CASTELLI, R. GALLI, N. MATTIUCCI and N. PALLARO (2004): Automotive applications of fiber Bragg grating sensors, in Proceedings of the 8th Confer- ence Sensors and Microsystems «Aisem 2003», edited by C. DI NATALE, A. D’AMICO, G. SONCINI, L. FERRARIO and M. ZEN (World Scientific Publisher), p. 545. FALCIAI, R., J.M. KENNY, A. TERENZI, C. TRONO and R. MEZZACASA (2005): Reinforcing and monitoring of concrete structures with composites and fiber optic sensors, in Proceedings of the 9th Conference Sensors and Microsystems «Aisem 2004», edited by C. DI NA- TALE, A. D’AMICO, G. MARTINELLI, M.C. CAROTTA and V. GUIDI (World Scientific Publisher), 329-336 HILL, K.O. and G. MELTZ (1997): Fiber Bragg Grating tech- nology fundamentals and overview, J. Lightwave Tech- nol., 15 (8), 1263 KERSEY, A.D., T.A. BERKOFF and W.W. MOREY (1992): High-resolution fibre-grating based strain sensor with interferometric wavelength-shift detection, Electron. Lett., 28 (3), 236-238. WENZ, G.M. (1962): Acoustic ambient noise in the ocean: spectra and sources, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 34, 1936-1956. XU, M.G., L. REEKIE, Y.T. CHOW and J.P. DAKIN (1993): Optical in-fibre grating high pressure sensor, Electron. Lett., 29, 398-399. (received September 6, 2005; accepted May 17, 2006)