Vol48/04/2005def 775 ANNALS OF GEOPHYSICS, VOL. 48, N. 4/5, August/October 2005 Key words SiF4 – vapour crystallisation – silica – degassing 1. Introduction Silica minerals are frequently found as vesi- cle fillings in recently erupted volcanic products, and are commonly interpreted as late or post- magmatic secondary phases. In a study of Mont- serrat it was reported that groundmass silica phases occur in slowly cooled (dome) lavas only and not in pumice from explosive eruptions, in- dicating that crystalline silica was produced by vapour-phase crystallisation and devitrification within the lava dome (Baxter et al., 1999). As crystalline silica may pose a serious health threat to humans if it enters the respiratory system, it was suggested that volcanoes with lava domes may pose a greater risk for silicosis than other types of volcanoes (Baxter et al., 1999). Silica enrichment in hydrothermal aureoles around magma chambers is commonly interpreted as the result of crystallisation from silica-saturated so- lutions, and leaching of other elements by acidic hydrothermal fluids (e.g., Giggenbach, 1984). However, these processes are typical of post-in- trusive alteration and it is unlikely that such processes act in erupting lava flows and domes. The importance of F species such as HF and SiF4 in mass transport during degassing was demon- strated by White and Hochella (1992), who de- scribe the depletion of weathering surfaces of basaltic lava flows in SiO2 and enrichment in Ca, Vapour-phase crystallisation of silica from SiF4-bearing volcanic gases Jan C.M. de Hoog, Manfred J. van Bergen and Michel H.G. Jacobs Department of Earth Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands Abstract Thermodynamic modelling of magmatic gases shows that SiF4 may be an important F-bearing species at the high pressures typical of magma reservoirs. Upon decompression during degassing, SiF4 will react with water vapour to form HF and silica. Common magmatic gases of high-T fumaroles seem to contain too little SiF4 to be a sig- nificant source of silica, except if extremely large amounts of gas percolate through a small volume of rock, as is the case in lava domes. Only if fluorine contents of the gases exceed 1 mol% detectable amounts of silica may be formed, but such high fluorine contents have not yet been observed in natural gases. Alternatively, silica may be formed by heating of cool SiF4-rich gases circulating in cooling lava bodies. We suggest that these mecha- nisms may be responsible for the deposition of crystalline silica, most probably cristobalite, observed in vesicles in lavas from Lewotolo volcano (Eastern Sunda Arc, Indonesia). Silica occurs as vapour-crystallised patches in vesicles, and is sometimes associated with F-phlogopite, which further supports F-rich conditions during depo- sition. Because of the connection between F-rich conditions and high-K volcanism, we propose that late-stage gaseous transport and deposition of silica may be more widespread in K-rich volcanoes than elsewhere, and long-term exposure to ash from eruptions of such volcanoes could therefore carry an increased risk for respira- tory diseases. The dependence of SiF4/HF on temperature reported here differs from the current calibration used for temperature measurements of fumarolic gases by remote sensing techniques, and we suggest an updated cal- ibration. Mailing address: Dr. Jan C.M. de Hoog, Department of Earth Sciences, Gothenburg University, Guldhedsgatan 5A, 413 20 Göteborg, Sweden; e-mail: cees-jan@gvc.gu.se 776 Jan C.M. de Hoog, Manfred J. van Bergen and Michel H.G. Jacobs Al, and Mg during post-eruptive degassing of cooling magma bodies. Here we present thermodynamic calculations that indicate that silica phases may form as a re- sult of decompression of HF-rich gas during as- cent of vapour-saturated magma, but also during heating of SiF4-bearing gases. SiF4 is a highly volatile compound at ambient pressures and tem- peratures (sublimation point = − 86°C at atmos- pheric pressure), which at elevated temperatures readily reacts with water vapour to form HF and silica. The reaction is very sensitive to tempera- ture and is shifted in favour of SiF4 at low tem- peratures (< 400ºC; Rosenberg, 1973), whereas in high-temperature fumaroles HF is the dominant fluorine-bearing species. The results will be used to explain the presence of small patches of a crys- talline silica phase, associated with fluorine-phl- ogopite, in vesicles in lavas from Lewotolo vol- cano (Eastern Sunda Arc, Indonesia). Fig. 1. Back-scatter electron images of a vesicle filling containing several patches of crystalline silica (cr), in- ferred to be cristobalite. The dashed lines indicate the approximate outline of the vesicle and interconnecting veins before the vesicle-filling assemblage was formed. Note the radial growth texture of the silica patches. The small needles sticking into the open space are F-phlogopite. Inset shows detail of one of the silica patches. 777 Vapour-phase crystallisation of silica from SiF4-bearing volcanic gases 1.1. Geological background Lewotolo volcano is located at Lomblen Is- land (8°27′S, 123°59′E) in the Nusa Tenggara (Lesser Sunda) Islands region of Indonesia. Strong fumarolic action at the summit produces a continuous outflow of hot (≤ 490°C) gases rich in H2O, CO2, H2S, SO2, HCl and HF (Poorter et al., 1991), pointing to the presence of a degassing magma chamber at shallow depth. Lewotolo has erupted porphyritic, high- K calc-alkaline rocks over a wide range of sili- ca contents from basalts to trachyandesites (47- 62 wt% SiO2; Stolz et al., 1990; Hoogewerff, 1999). High fluorine contents of bulk rock (up to 800 ppm; Vroon, 1989), groundmass glass (up to 6000 ppm), apatite and phlogopite (De Hoog, 1995) indicate that the Lewotolo mag- mas are relatively rich in fluorine. 1.2. Petrography of vesicle fillings A detailed description of the vesicle fillings was presented in De Hoog and Van Bergen (2000), in which the authors describe the pres- ence of the rare mineral zirconolite in these fill- ings. We will summarize the relevant parts here. Vesicles in about half of the lavas from Lewotolo volcano are partially to completely filled with an assemblage of mainly alkali feldspar, plagioclase and a silica phase. In addi- tion the vesicles contain small amounts of cli- no- and orthopyroxene and magnetite, and trace amounts of zirconolite, ilmenite and apatite. These partially filled former vesicles will be re- ferred to as vesicle fillings (fig. 1). The fillings have sieve-like textures and can be distin- guished from the groundmass by a coarser grain-size, higher porosity, and the absence of glass. In samples with large amounts of vesicle fillings the whole network of former vesicles is interconnected. If the assemblage fills veinlets, the texture is denser, with a lower porosity close to that of the groundmass. A crystalline silica phase grew as isotropic to low-birefringent patches with a radial struc- ture into voids, or occupies interstitial spaces, e.g., between crystals or near cracks (fig. 1). In- dividual patches can reach sizes up to 200 µm; the total volume in the rock is small, however, and does not exceed 0.02 vol%. Optical mi- croscopy did not conclusively distinguish be- tween cristobalite and tridymite, but the com- mon anisotropy and textures typical of shrink- age features point to cristobalite. Thin whiskers of phlogopite occasionally intrude into the left- open space within the former vesicles. The vesicle fillings were probably deposited from a migrating fluid phase, possibly derived from deeper parts of the magma chamber, dur- ing a very late stage of magmatic evolution (De Hoog and Van Bergen, 2000). The morphology of later-stage minerals (crystalline silica, phlo- gopite) suggests that these may have crys- tallised from a less dense vapour phase. 2. Thermodynamic modeling We studied the formation of silica phases as a result of decompression of SiF4-rich phases using the equilibrium reaction (2.1) Although equilibrium between a vapour phase and silica is a valid assumption for the forma- tion of silica from a SiF4-bearing gas, reaction (2.1) is only an approximation of equilibrium between vapour and siliceous melt. In the un- derlying paper we follow the deductions of White and Hochella (1992) that the net free-en- ergy differences between silica and siliceous melt are negligible compared to temperature and pressure effects. In the calculations it is assumed that the rest gases SO2, H2S, CO2 and HCl do not participate in the equilibrium reaction given by reaction (2.1). However H2S will react with H2O to form SO2 and H2 following the reaction (2.2) The equilibrium of the reaction shifts to the right with decreasing pressure, thus consuming H2O. However, because the amount of S in vol- canic gases is much smaller than the amount of H2O, the effect of reaction (2.2) on reaction (2.1) will be negligible. ( ) ( ) .g gO( ) ( )g gH S 2H SO 3H2 2 2 2D+ + .( )gOH2+( ) ( ) ( )s g gSiO 4HF SiF2 4 2D+ 778 Jan C.M. de Hoog, Manfred J. van Bergen and Michel H.G. Jacobs Applying the equilibrium condition to reac- tion (2.1) by setting the Gibbs energy of the re- actants equal to that of the products results in (2.3) (2.4) where P represents pressure, T thermodynamic temperature, R the gas constant, K the equilibri- um constant and the superscript «o» refers to the reference pressure Po=1 bar and Pj represent the partial pressures of the substances j = SiF4, H2O and HF. The Gibbs energies of the pure substances, Gj o(T), at 1 bar pressure are expressed in terms of the enthalpy of formation, ∆Hf, jo , absolute entropies, Sjo, and heat capacities CP, jo, as (2.5) The enthalpies of formation and absolute en- tropies refer to a common reference tempera- ture T0 = 298.15 K and are found in thermody- namic tables (JANAF, 1985; Barin, 1989). The heat capacity data in these tables were fitted with polynomial functions with an accuracy better than 0.1%. The Gibbs energy of solid SiO2 at arbitrary pressure and temperature conditions is calculat- ed using (2.6) where j=SiO2 and Vj, the molar volume of SiO2. The molar volume of a solid substance is calculated using a Murnaghan equation of state (2.7) ( ) ( )V V K K P P1 ( )K o o o o 1 o = + - l l : D S +T $-+H∆=, T + ( )G P C dT T C dT V dP , , , j f j P j T T j P j T T j P P o o o o 0 0 o + * 4 # # # .$T-+H∆ C dT=( )G T S T C dT, , , j f j P j T T j P j T T o o o o o 0 0 +* 4# # +G-G4+( ,G P T)=( ,G P T T T G T2 SiO HF o SiF o H O o 2 4 2 - ∆ ) ] ] ] g g g ( )lnRT K=lnRT=( ,G P T P P P P HF 4 SiF H O 2 o4 2∆ ) c m where Ko represents the isothermal bulk modu- lus and (Ko)′ its pressure derivative at 1 bar pressure. The molar volume at 1 bar pressure, Vo, is calculated using the expression (2.8) where αo represents the thermal expansivity at 1 bar pressure. Polynomial expressions for Ko, (Ko)′ and αo as function of temperature and the molar volume of SiO2 were taken from the work of Swamy et al. (1994). Depending on pressure and temperature, SiO2 may exist in the forms α-quartz, β-quartz, tridymite, cristobalite, coesite and stishovite. From these six forms of SiO2 we considered on- ly α-quartz, β-quartz and tridymite because our study was limited to a pressure range between 0-2.5 GPa and temperature range between 1100-1400 K. Note that cristobalite is not a sta- ble phase at the pressure and temperature con- ditions of our investigation, although it is often observed to be the most common crystalline sil- ica phase in volcanic rocks (e.g., Baxter et al., 1999). The crystallisation of cristobalite, in- stead of a stable silica form, has a negligible ef- fect on the results of the thermodynamic calcu- lations compared to effects associated with er- rors in thermodynamic data. The calculations of the partial pressures of HF, SiF4 and H2O and the partial pressure of the rest gas at arbitrary pressure and temperature conditions proceeds as follows. When a pressure is applied to the system or when the temperature of the system is changed, the partial pressures of HF, H2O and SiF4 change and an amount of SiO2 is consumed. At the condition (Po,T), the number of moles noHF, noSiF4 and n o H2O of each gas phase species is calculated from the measured partial pressures. According to eq. (2.1) at arbitrary con- ditions (P, T′ ) an amount, m, of SiO2 reacts with 4m moles of HF to form m moles of SiF4 and 2m moles of H2O. The amount of moles in the gas phase changes from noHF + noSiF4 + n o H2O + n o restgas to noHF + noSiF4 + n o H2O + n o restgas−m. The partial pressures of the substances in the gas phase are P N n m P P N n m P4 2 HF HF o H O H O o 2 2 = - = +] ^g h T T( ) ( ) ( )expV V T dT T T o o o o 0 = af p# 779 Vapour-phase crystallisation of silica from SiF4-bearing volcanic gases (2.9) Inserting these relations into eqs. (2.3) and (2.4) leads to (2.10) The Gibbs energy difference ∆G(P,T) is calcu- lated by eq. (2.4). It is constrained by thermo- dynamic data of the gas phase species and the solid forms of SiO2. With noHF, noSiF4, n o H2O and norestgas measured at the experimental condition (Po,T), the amount m is calculated with eq. (2.10), leading to calculated partial pressures of the gas phase species at arbitrary pressure and temperature conditions. The algorithm of the computational procedure is included in the pro- gram XiPT, which is a successor of the program TXY-Calc (Jacobs et al., 1996; Jacobs and Spencer, 1996). ( , .exp n m n m n n n n m n m P P RT G P T 2 4 SiF o H O o HF o SiF o H O o HF o restgas o o 2 4 4 2 4 2 + + + + + - + - = ∆ ) ^ ^ ^ ] b h h g h l . P N n m P P N n P N n n n n m SiF SiF o restgas restgas o HF o SiF o H O o restgas o 4 4 4 2 = + = = + + + - ^ ^ h h The calculations were performed using the compositions of hot (up to 490°C) summit fu- maroles from Lewotolo volcano (Poorter et al., 1991). Equilibrium compositions and tempera- tures were recalculated by an iterative gas- restoration procedure (Poorter et al., 1991) and are given in table I. HCl, HF and H2 values are in the normal range of volcanoes related to sub- duction zones, but CO2 and SO2 values and HF/HCl ratios are high compared to world- wide high-temperature fumarole data given by Symonds et al. (1994). We note that, because of differences in solubility of the various volatiles, the composition of gases at higher pressures is potentially different from those at atmospheric pressure, but these effects are difficult to quan- tify and therefore not considered in the paper. 3. Results and discussion 3.1. Temperature dependence of HF/SiF4 The variation of HF/SiF4 with T for various partial pressures of HF in the system SiO2-HF- H2O-SiF4 is plotted in fig. 2. Note that the x-ax- is in fig. 2 is a log scale, so that the increase in HF/SiF4 between two markers (2 units) corre- sponds to a 100-fold increase of HF/SiF4. The temperature dependence of reaction (2.1) at 1 bar has been documented earlier by Rosenberg (1973) and White and Hochella (1992), and SiF4 and HF are also included in the GAS- WORKS program used to calculate equilibrium compositions of volcanic gases (Symonds et al., 1992). As shown in fig. 2, our results closely match those of Rosenberg (1973), except for a slight deviation at lower temperatures. A few data points published by Symonds et al. (1992) are consistent with these trends. However, the calculations of White and Hochella (1992) devi- ate, showing a straight line with a slope which is considerably less steep than the curves pre- dicted by Rosenberg (1973) and our data. As largely the same thermodynamic databases were used in all cases, we hypothesize that the trends of White and Hochella (1992) were based on models or assumptions that are not documented in their paper, which makes it dif- ficult to verify their calculations. The agreement Table I. Recalculated compositions of Lewotolo gas samples in mol% (after Poorter et al., 1991). Average 1σ (n = 4) H2O 73.5 4.4 CO2 15.9 4.4 SO2 7.76 2.5 H2S 0.86 0.51 HCl 0.169 0.106 HF 0.0465 0.0175 N2 1.39 1 H2 0.34 0.355 Equilibrium temperatures are 950 ± 50°C; sampling temperatures were ∼ 490°C at 50 cm depth. Ar, He and CH4 are present at ppm-level. Calculated oxygen fugacities are ± 10−11 bar, slightly higher than the QFM-buffer. 780 Jan C.M. de Hoog, Manfred J. van Bergen and Michel H.G. Jacobs with the data of Rosenberg (1973) and Symonds et al. (1992) supports that our model is valid for 1 bar, and can be used to predict equilibria at higher pressures (see below). The curves in fig. 2 show the variation of HF/SiF4 with T for a fixed value of PHF and at a total vapour pressure of 1 bar. As production of SiF4 consumes HF, PHF is not constant, and the curves do therefore not represent cooling paths. However, HF consumption by production of SiF4 is important only if PSiF4 is close to PHF, so that in fig. 2 only the bottom part of the curves would be noticeably influenced. Reaction (2.1) is strongly dependent on temperature and on partial HF pressure. For ex- ample, a drop in temperature from 1400 to 800 K will decrease HF/SiF4 by over 3 log units (∼1250 times). The amount of SiF4 will be higher than HF below 500 K if PHF = 0.01 bar. Therefore, at atmospheric pressure, SiF4 does occur only in significant amounts at high partial pressures of HF and low temperatures. Dilution of HF-rich gas with HF-poor gas of the same temperature will have a strong effect on SiF4, e.g., diluting a gas 10 times will decrease PSiF4 by a factor 10000. Dilution of volcanic with at- mospheric gases will lower T and PHF, two pa- rameters with opposing effects on SiF4 produc- tion. Modelling shows that conservative mixing of high-T volcanic gases with air will increase the relative amount of SiF4, because the tem- perature effect outweighs the dilution effect. Fig. 2. Variation of SiF4/HF (expressed as log[PHF/PSiF4]) with T (in K) at different partial pressures of HF, and 1 bar total vapour pressure (PHF+PSiF4+PH2O = 1). Continuous lines are from our own calculations, whereas dot- ted lines are data from Rosenberg (1973), dashed lines are after White and Hochella (1993), and the two circles are data points from Symonds et al. (1992) with PHF = 10−3.07 bar. Uncertainties in our data due to uncertainties in heat of formation and enthalpy of SiO2, HF, H2O and SiF4 are about 25° and 0.2 log units. Note that the rel- ative importance of SiF4 increases both with total amount of F in the system (i.e., PHF), and with decreasing tem- perature. White and Hochella (1992) trends are clearly offset and predict HF/SiF4 variations with temperature that are much larger than other models. 781 Vapour-phase crystallisation of silica from SiF4-bearing volcanic gases 3.2. Pressure dependence of HF/SiF4 Figure 3 illustrates the variation of PHF/PSiF4 with pressure at P*HF = 10−2.5 and 10−1.0 and tem- peratures typical of magmatic gases (where P*HF is the partial pressure of HF(PHF/Ptotal); P*HF = =PHF at atmospheric pressure). The ratio PHF/ /PSiF4 increases strongly with decreasing pres- sure, especially in the low-pressure part of the system. The various curves that were calculated for different temperatures between 1100 and 1400 K are close to parallel. Applying a pres- sure of 860 bar to a system initially at atmos- pheric pressure will shift the equilibrium by 3 log units, equivalent to a 10-fold increase in PHF in fig. 2. Therefore, at this pressure the fig- ure is similar to the one at 1 bar, except that the continuous lines are valid at P*HF values that are ten times lower than indicated at 1 bar. Even though the relative amount of SiF4 in- creases at high pressure, the absolute quantities are still very low in volcanic gases, as HF con- centrations are generally low (PHF < 10−2) and the total amount of SiF4 is even smaller than HF (as PHF/PSiF4 > 10 5 at magmatic temperatures, see fig. 2). However, if gases would be more HF-rich, SiF4 would become a significant com- ponent even at moderate pressures (fig. 3). For example, if P*HF = 10−1 then SiF4 contains more than 1% of the total amount of fluorine over the whole temperature and pressure interval stud- ied here, except at pressures lower than ∼100 bar, and at 1100 K it is the dominant fluorine species at pressures higher than 500 bar. We Fig. 3. Variation of log (PHF/PSiF4) with total pressure for various temperatures at P * HF = 10−2.5 and P*HF = 10−1.0, respectively. The importance of SiF4 increases with decreasing temperature, increasing PHF, and increasing pres- sure. The circles represent data at 1 bar, and are equivalent to the values in fig. 2 at the same temperature and P*HF . 782 Jan C.M. de Hoog, Manfred J. van Bergen and Michel H.G. Jacobs note, however, that such high partial HF pres- sures have never been observed in nature. 3.3. Formation of SiO2 3.3.1. Pressure-release induced crystallisation of SiO2 Because of the temperature and pressure de- pendence of the SiF4/HF ratio, SiO2 can be pro- duced in two ways: 1) by an increase of the temperature of the system, or 2) by a decrease of pressure. As pressure decrease is common during magmatic degassing, whereby exsolved vapour rises through a magma column, we will discuss this process in more detail. When magma becomes volatile saturated, e.g., in response to decompression or fractional crystallisation, a separate fluid phase forms in which volatile components, including HF, will be concentrated. HF is a very reactive gas, and it will react with the melt to form SiF4, follow- ing reaction (2.1), and other less volatile species, such as MgF2, CaF2 and AlF3 (White and Hochella, 1992). This way, appreciable amounts of silica may be entrained in the volatile phase, the exact amount being deter- mined by thermodynamic equilibrium and by the solubility and concentration of fluorine in the system. Here we assume that thermodynam- ic properties during reaction with siliceous melt are not significantly different from reaction with pure SiO2 (White and Hochella, 1992; see Methods). If the magma starts or continues to rise, vapour pressure decreases and Reaction 1 will shift to the left resulting in precipitation (sublimation) of silica from the vapour. If we assume a magma which contains a vapour phase with PHF = 10−2.6 bar, an isothermal pressure decrease from 1000 to 1 bar at 1400 K would cause a shift in logPSiF4 from −8.5 to −11.6, and would result in the production of SiO2. However, as the total amount of SiF4 in the system is very small, the amount of SiO2 formed during pressure release is limited. Un- der the assumed conditions 1 mol SiO2 would be formed from ∼794 kmol HF, or, expressed in weight, ∼260 kg HF is needed to form 1 g sili- ca. This amount of HF is equivalent to ∼105 000 kg magmatic vapour. A dynamic model in which large amounts of gas percolate through a relatively small rock volume is therefore need- ed to deposit significant amounts of silica. In our example from Lewotolo, a gas/rock ratio of 1300 is needed to deposit 0.2‰ silica by vol- ume (the estimated amount of silica in some of the samples). However, while such as scenario might work for dome lavas, it is difficult to rec- oncile with the presence of silica patches with- in vesicles in lavas on the flanks of Lewotolo volcano. If we apply the model to Mt. Etna (Sicily, Italy), which is one of the larger gas- producing volcanoes on Earth, with an average HF production of 100-300 ton per day (Francis et al., 1998; Pennisi and Le Cloarec, 1998), the amount of silica formed during decompression of SiF4-bearing gas could be about 1 kg per day, depending on assumptions regarding P*HF at depth. Clearly, these amounts are exceedingly small. 3.3.2. The effect of changing temperatures In the above calculations we assumed that the temperature of the magmatic gas phase is constant. Because the HF/SiF4 ratio is strongly temperature dependent, a temperature decrease during degassing will counteract the formation of SiO2 induced by pressure release. Thermody- namic calculations on ascending magma-gas mixtures (Mastin and Ghiorso, 1998) for water- saturated magmas decompressing from 50 MPa to 1 atm suggest that temperature changes may vary between a 50°C decrease to an almost 10°C increase, depending on whether degassing takes place below the fragmentation depth and whether the magma is mafic or silicic. In the case of passive degassing (no fragmentation) the process is isenthalpic for silicic magmas (temperature may increase) and isentropic for basaltic magmas (temperature decreases). However, the temperature effect is small com- pared to the pressure effect (fig. 3). For exam- ple, in order to balance PHF/PSiF4 in a 1400 K vapour during decompression from 1 kbar to at- mospheric pressure, a simultaneous tempera- ture decrease of almost 600°C would be need- ed. We conclude therefore that any tempera- Vapour-phase crystallisation of silica from SiF4-bearing volcanic gases tures variations during decompression and de- gassing have an effect on the formation of SiO2 that is negligible compared to that of pressure release. 3.3.3. The effect of PHF As almost all SiF4 is converted to SiO2 dur- ing decompression, the amount of SiO2 formed is essentially limited by the amount of silicon initially present in the gas phase. At partial pressures of HF common in high-T fumaroles the amount of SiO2 formed is extremely small. Increasing the amount of SiF4 in the gas phase in response to 1) a higher fluorine activity in the vapour, or 2) lower gas temperatures would in- crease the amount of SiO2 formed. A tempera- ture decrease of about 350 K would result in a ten times higher SiO2 production, which is still rather insignificant. The effect of P*HF , howev- er, is much stronger: an increase of P*HF from 0.001 to 0.01 results in a decrease of 3 log units of PHF/PSiF4. In other words, while the amount of HF increases by a factor of 10, the amount of SiF4 increases by a factor of 10000. If we as- sume an initial P*HF = 0.05 and T = 1250 K, the amount of SiO2 formed during decompression is about 2.5 mol% (or 7.5 wt%) of the amount of HF present in the gas. The validity of such a scenario is difficult to evaluate, as little is known about the concentration of fluorine in late-stage magmatic vapours at high pressures. It is of interest to note that silica patches in the vesicles in Lewotolo lavas are often associated with thin whiskers of F-phlogopite that stick out of the silica mass. This suggests a common origin of both phases and a very high fluorine activity during crystallisation (De Hoog and Van Bergen, 2000). Although such F-rich com- positions have yet to be observed in volcanic gases, the co-existence with F-phlogopite makes crystallisation of silica from F-rich vapour an attractive hypothesis. As an alternative, silica may have been de- posited from within the lava flow, i.e., not in re- sponse to depressurisation but as a result of the large temperature gradients in the cooling lava. Although in cooling gases SiF4/HF will in- crease and therefore the lava surface may be- come depleted in silica (White and Hochella, 1992), the heating of SiF4-rich gases is an effi- cient way of producing silica because of the large SiF4/HF ratios of these gases compared to hot, pressurized magmatic vapour. For exam- ple, SiF4/HF ratios of up to 0.2 and SiF4 fluxes of up to 1 kton have been measured in the plume of Popocatepetl (Love et al., 1998), and because of the steep slope of SiF4/HF ratios with temperature at low T (fig. 2), heating of these gases by only 100°C would convert most SiF4 to SiO2. In a similar manner, silica may be deposited locally by gas circulating in cooling lava bodies. It is of interest to emphasize that Lewotolo is a high-K volcano, as K-rich magmatic sys- tems are considered to be often enriched in flu- orine as well (e.g., Edgar et al., 1996; Strecher, 1998). Therefore, silica deposited during vapour decompression might be relatively com- mon in volcanoes with high-K characteristics. We discovered silica patches (without F-phlo- gopite) similar in texture and appearance to those of Lewotolo, in lavas from Rinjani, a K- rich volcano on Lombok, which supports this supposition. Exposure to ash from eruptions of high-K volcanoes could therefore pose an in- creased risk for respiratory diseases, in a simi- lar manner as eruptions from dome-forming lavas raised concerns about adverse health ef- fects because of their high contents of crys- talline silica (Baxter et al., 1999). We note that Lewotolo does not form lava domes, yet crys- talline silica is present in many of its lavas. 3.4. Implications for measurements of fumarole temperatures by remote sensing Figure 2 shows that the equilibrium temper- ature can be calculated if PHF and PSiF4 are known. This relation was used by Francis et al. (1996) to remotely determine fumarole temper- atures at Vulcano (Italy). The authors calculat- ed that fumarole temperatures were 200-450°C, which was in good agreement with directly measured temperatures of 210-690°C. Francis et al. (1996) used the thermodynam- ic calculations of White and Hochella (1992), which, as discussed above, are inconsistent with 783 784 Jan C.M. de Hoog, Manfred J. van Bergen and Michel H.G. Jacobs the results of Rosenberg (1973), Symonds et al. (1992) and the calculations presented here (fig. 2). Our thermodynamic model (cf. reaction (2.3)) predicts the temperature dependence of SiF4/HF as follows: (3.1) in which it is assumed that PH2O = 0.8 bar and PHF, PSiF4 << PH2O , which are common condi- tions in volcanic plumes and fumaroles. Repeating the calculations of Francis et al. (1996) with our thermodynamic data yields equilibrium temperatures around 100°C, with a maximum of ∼180°C. These values are much lower than the findings of Francis et al. (1996) and directly measured temperatures of 250- 600°C. In addition, the calculated range of temperatures for the different fumaroles is much smaller than observed. We hypothesize that the initial match between remotely meas- ured and observed fumarole temperatures was fortuitous, and suggest that more work is need- ed to confirm that the remote-sensing ap- proach can be reliably used to estimate fuma- role temperatures. The discrepancy might be due to the absence of equilibrium between the gas components (which is more likely for het- erogeneous equilibria, in which case one of the phases in the reaction is a solid, here silica). Alternatively, in view of our inferred tempera- ture of ∼100°C, the remote-sensing results may represent the temperature of condensing water vapour (steam), as water is the main component of the gases. Irrespective of these considerations, the strong influence of PHF on calculated temperatures implies that errors in remote-sensing thermometry will be large un- less HF can be measured simultaneously with SiF4. Acknowledgements We thank Marie Edmonds and particularly Mike Burton for insightful reviews, and Mike Carroll and Roberto Moretti for editorial han- dling of the manuscript. ( ) . T P P logP C log 3 4 755 5574 273 SiF HF HF 4 = + - - -c c m REFERENCES BARIN, I. (1989): Thermochemical data of pure substances, Part II. VCH Verlagsgesellschaft GmbH, D6940 Wein- heim (FRG). BAXTER, P.J., C. BONADONNA, R. DUPREE, V.L. HARDS, S.C. KOHN, M.D. MURPHY, A. NICHOLS, R.A. NICHOLSON, G. NORTON, A. SEARL, R.S.J. SPARKS and B.P. VICKERS (1999): Cristobalite in volcanic ash of the Soufriere Hills Volcano, Montserrat, British West Indies, Sci- ence, 283, 1142-1145. DE HOOG, J.C.M. (1995): Magma evolution and volatile be- haviour at Lewotolo volcano, Lesser Sunda Islands, In- donesia, M.Sc. Thesis (Utrecht University, The Nether- lands), (unpublished). DE HOOG, J.C.M. and M.J. VAN BERGEN (2000): Volatile-in- duced transport of HFSE, REE, Th and U in arc mag- mas: evidence from zirconolite-bearing vesicles in potassic lavas of Lewotolo volcano (Indonesia), Con- trib. Mineral. Petrol., 139, 485-502. EDGAR, A.D., L.A. PIZZOLATO and J. SHEEN (1996): Fluo- rine in igneous rocks and minerals with emphasis on ultrapotassic mafic and ultramafic magmas and their mantle source regions, Mineral. Mag., 60, 243-257. FRANCIS, P., C. CHAFFIN, A. MACIEJEWSKI and C. OPPEN- HEIMER (1996): Remote determination of SiF4 in vol- canic plumes; a new tool for volcano monitoring, Geo- phys. Res. Lett., 23, 249-252. FRANCIS, P., M.R. BURTON and C. OPPENHEIMER (1998): Re- mote measurements of volcanic gas compositions by solar occultation spectroscopy, Nature, 396, 567-570. GIGGENBACH, W.F. (1984): Mass transfer in hydrothermal alteration, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 48, 2693-2711. HOOGEWERFF, J.A. (1999): Magma genesis and slab-wedge interaction across an island arc-continent collision zone, East Sunda Arc, Indonesia, Ph.D. Thesis (Utrecht University), Geologica Ultraiectina 178, pp. 199. JACOBS, M.H.G. and P.J. SPENCER (1996): A critical thermo- dynamic evaluation of the systems Si-Zn and Al-Si-Zn Calphad, Computer Coupling of Phase Diagrams and Thermochemistry, 20 (3), 307-314. JACOBS, M.H.G., R. JELLEMA and H.A.J. OONK (1996): TXY-Calc, a program for the calculation of thermody- namic properties and phase equilibria in ternary sys- tems. An application to the system (Li, Na, K) Br, Cal- phad, Computer Coupling of Phase Diagrams and Thermochemistry, 20 (1), 79-88. JANAF (1985): JANAF Thermodynamic Tables, Parts I and II. NBS Natl. Std. Ref. Data Syst. (NSRDS-NBS), 3rd edition. LOVE, S.P., F. GOFF, D. COUNCE, C. SIEBE and H. DELGADO (1998): Passive infrared spectroscopy of the eruption plume at Popocatépetl volcano, Mexico, Nature, 396, 563-567. MASTIN, L.G. and M.S. GHIORSO (1998): Adiabatic temper- ature changes of magma-gas mixtures during volcanic eruptions, in AGU Fall Meeting, San Francisco, U.S.A., abstr. V22C-05. PENNISI, M. and M-F. LE CLOAREC (1998): Variations of Cl, F, and S in Mt. Etna’s plume, Italy, between 1992 and 1995, J. Geophys. Res., B103, 5061-5066. POORTER, R.P.E., J.C. VAREKAMP, R.J. POREDA, M.J. VAN BERGEN and R. KREULEN (1991): Chemical and iso- 785 Vapour-phase crystallisation of silica from SiF4-bearing volcanic gases topic compositions of volcanic gases from the east Sunda and Banda arcs, Indonesia, Geochim. Cos- mochim. Acta, 55, 3795-3807. ROSENBERG, P.E. (1973): HF/SiF4 ratios in volcanic and mag- matic gases, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 37, 109-112. STOLZ, A.J., R. VARNE, G.R. DAVIES, G.E. WHELLER and J.D. FODEN (1990): Magma source components in an arc-continent collision zone: the Flores-Lembata sector Sunda Arc, Indonesia, Contrib. Mineral. Petrol., 105, 585-601. STRECHER, O. (1998): Fluorine geochemistry in volcanic rock series: examples from Iceland and Jan Mayen, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 62, 3117-3130. SWAMY, V., S.K. SAXENA, B. SUNDMAN and J. ZHANG (1994): A thermodynamic assessment of silica phase diagram, J. Geophys. Res., 99 (B6), 11787-11794. SYMONDS, R.B., M.H. REED and W.I. ROSE (1992): Origin, speciation and fluxes of trace-element gases at Augus- tine volcano, Alaska: insights into magma degassing and fumarolic processes, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 56, 633-657. SYMONDS, R.B., W.I. ROSE, G.J.S. BLUTH and T.M. GER- LACH (1994): Volcanic-gas studies: methods, results, and applications, in Volatiles in Magmas, edited by M.R. CARROLL and J.R. HOLLOWAY, Rev. Mineral., 30, 1-66. VROON, P.Z., M.J. VAN BERGEN, J.C. VAREKAMP and R.P.E. POORTER (1989): Fluorine geochemistry of tholeiitic to potassic-alkaline arc volcanics from the Banda Sea re- gion, Eastern Indonesia, in IAVCEI Meeting on Conti- nental Magmatism, Santa Fé, New Mexico, p. 283 (ab- str.). WHITE, A.F. and M.F. HOCHELLA JR. (1992): Surface chem- istry associated with the cooling and subaerial weath- ering of recent basalt flows, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac- ta, 56, 3711-3721.