10Vogt.qxd 465 ANNALS OF GEOPHYSICS, VOL. 47, N. 2/3, April/June 2004 Key words West Indies – historical seismology 1. Introduction This contribution presents a short glimpse at the historical seismology of the West Indies (fig. 1). Some personal experience of the area leads to a tentative appraisal of the state-of-the- art. While methodological and source problems are stressed, mostly from the author’s own ex- perience, no effort has been made to provide an up-to-date inventory of catalogues of different types or specific papers, the discussion being limited to a more or less representative sample of both. Indeed available information, often new, could fill a book. Actually, the historical seismology of the West Indies is not a field of over-research as some parts of the world are sometimes thought to be. While parts of the Caribbean area partic- ipated in the renaissance of historical seismolo- gy, mostly Venezuela and Central America, parts of it escaped it, aside from sweeping cat- alogues, often inspired by former ones, and considering only publications founded on gen- uine research with a renewal of knowledge and/or interpretation. Indeed the history of West Indian earthquakes forms a patchwork not easi- ly mastered. It should not be forgotten, in a general way, that research often must be under- taken in not always easily accessible deposito- ries, archives and libraries, in Europe and the United States. 2. Catalogues and studies of West Indies seismicity, and associated problems Leaving aside classical seismological compi- lations, such as Perrey (1846), Poey (1857), Scherer’s papers on the seismicity of Haiti A glimpse at the historical seismology of the West Indies Jean Vogt Rue du Docteur Woehrlin 1, Strasbourg, France Abstract This contribution describes the state-of-the-art of historical seismology in the West Indies. An overview of the current parametric earthquake catalogues shows that historical earthquakes in the Greater and Lesser Antilles are less well known compared to those which affected the Venezuelan and Central American regions. Problems are still numerous and hard to solve for most former earthquakes, known from the mid 16th century on. The analy- sis of the catalogues shows that they are incomplete, and that their reliability also should be reconsidered. In re- cent years, the author has investigated locally stored primary historical sources as well as those in foreign archives and libraries, for instance in France and the United States. The paper deals with some case histories, the 1692, 1751, 1767, 1770, 1830, 1842, 1852, 1860, 1887, 1892 earthquakes in the Greater Antilles, the 1690, 1727, 1839, 1843, 1867 and 1897 in the Lesser Antilles. The examples highlight that there is still a need for further improving our knowledge on the historical seismicity of the West Indies, and that the investigation of the sources and repositories located outside this region is an open way to fruitfully approach this task. Mailing address: Dr. Jean Vogt, Rue du Docteur Woehrlin 1, 67000 Strasbourg-Robertsau, France. 466 Jean Vogt (Scherer, 1911; Scherer, 1912), half a century lat- er, emphasizing major events of the 18th century and mid 19th century (1751, 1770, 1842), should be hailed as a landmark. He encompasses in a modern way, not always attained nowadays, the many facets of historical seismology even if seis- motectonic interpretation is still in its infancy. At the same time Taber and others investigate spe- cific past and contemporaneous events with the same state of mind (e.g., Reid and Taber, 1920). However a slump followed, with different time spans from one island or cluster of islands to another. While seismotectonic discussion went on, more or less, often in a straightforward way, historical seismology was neglected to a large extent, sometimes in a paradoxical way. While Taber skilfully uses arguments from well-mastered historical seismology for an overall view of «the seismic-belt of the Greater Antilles» (Taber, 1922), the pages devoted to the West Indies by Sieberg’s Erdbebengeogra- phie in Gutenberg’s famous Handbuch are a disaster, misleading as much by the choice of events as, it seems, by the short information given for them. Major events escape it, e.g., the well known 1842 earthquake in northern Haiti or the major Cuban events of 1766 and 1852, while less important ones are nevertheless con- sidered as wichtigere Erdbeben (strong earth- quakes). In several cases sweeping information on damage should be carefully checked. For in- stance, it would be interesting to know if there is really any substance to the Küstenabbruch (coastal cliff fall) reported for the 1751 earth- quake in Haiti, an event I know fairly well. Later, a paradoxical message is delivered by Rutten and Raadshooven (1940). Quoting sev- eral older catalogues, Perrey (1846), Poey (1857), Salterain y Legarra (1884), they state that «they are [...] of no great use to modern re- searches as the combination of macroseismic and seismographic data, necessary for a good Fig. 1. Greater and Lesser Antilles: places mentioned in the text. 467 A glimpse at the historical seismology of the West Indies ones have since been produced for the greatest part of the West Indies, also with shortcomings. It seems that the trend begins with the early cat- alogue devoted by Robson (1964) for the east- ern Caribbean. It is mostly based on informa- tion easily available in Trinidad and neighbour- ing islands, using, besides Mallet (1853-1855) and, partly, Perrey (1846), information given by newspapers. He himself writes that «no attempt has been made to examine the source material from which these catalogues (Mallet, Perrey) [but not Poey] were compiled, a costly under- taking..., sources whose reliability it has not been possible to assess» (Robson, 1964). On the whole, assessments of intensities, some times clearly conventional, are not reliable. In most cases, macroseismic areas and epicentres are not discussed. Even Trinidad is not mas- tered, at least for events of the 18th century. Nevertheless this catalogue is useful for collect- ing a wealth of local, hardly interpreted infor- mation that can be used for a wider regional discussion. Data banks uncritically fed by Rob- son’s (1964) catalogue would be misleading, with the exception of the use of such basic ma- terial. Personally I plan to exploit my files to provide a more balanced view of Trinidad’s his- torical seismicity, mostly linked to earthquakes at some distance, which nevertheless are some- times destructive. Jamaica, a larger island, with better possi- bilities of comparison with other islands at sim- ilar scales, and with a larger background of his- torical seismology, is better mastered by Tomblin and Robson’s (1977) catalogue, once more fed to a large extent by a systematic search in West Indian, chiefly Jamaican news- papers. While no thorough catalogue seems to have been recently devoted to Haiti, several re- gional or global catalogues, including of course the Haitian seismic activity, have been prepared for the Dominican Republic in a more or less repetitive way. Martinez Barrios’ catalogue (1946) in the mid 20th century is followed in 1978 by Utrera (1978), adding information to Scherer’s fundamental work (covering also the Eastern part of the island) and by a succession of catalogues by Acosta Segura (1987; n.d.). Sometimes these do not always meet expected standards, for example, with regard to sources. understanding of the phenomena, is only possi- ble since about 30 years». Casually they also mention Scherer and some others. While short- comings of catalogues, old as well as recent, are numerous, the authors clearly underestimate, as a kind of postulate, the value of historical seis- mology on the whole. Limiting their efforts to the instrumental period, from 1913 to 1938, they however have to admit many shortcomings of seismographical data. They are disturbed by the «remarkable fact that in the West Indies dur- ing the past 27 years quite a number of earth- quakes with rather large intensity and spreading have been felt which are not registered in seis- mograms» (Haiti, Dominican Republic, Ja- maica, Puerto Rico). Also «as far back as 1914 the strong Jamaica earthquakes have not been recorded at other observatories than St. Mar- tial» (Haiti). Besides, a lot of strong events «have not found a place in the International Seismological Summary». Despising historical macroseismology in a general way, they never- theless have to stress the importance of con- temporaneous macroseismology evolving, of course, into the former. Later, look, for in- stance, at the Caribbean sketch of a paper de- voted in 1973 to prediction criteria of major plate boundaries (Kelleher et al., 1973). In a symptomatic way you will find a lot of question marks, not all easily identified and understood, for events of Lesser Antilles (1831, 1834) and Haiti (1751, 1770, 1860, 1887, 1911). Clearly the authors are not at ease with events of the past. We read: «Estimated rupture zones of Caribbean shocks since 1800; three great shocks of the 18th century are also included». What about other events with similar intensi- ties, seemingly also important for such discus- sion? So the performance of historical seismol- ogy, a quarter of a century ago, seems poor at first glance. While question marks are still pres- ent for a lot of 19th century events, major events of the 18th century were rather well known at that time, with, of course, a steady im- provement since. Of course problems are still numerous and hard to solve for most former earthquakes, known from mid 16th century on- wards. After a lot of more or less specific cata- logues, with more or less shortcomings, new 468 Jean Vogt Most interesting are the maps devoted by Nuevo Atlas Nacional de Cuba (1989) to the seismicity of the Caribbean and the country. While magnitudes are stressed from 1904 on- wards (Alvarez Gomez, 1989), a map of epi- centres is proposed from 1551 to 1983 (Chuy Rodriguez, 1989). Without discussing its con- ception from other points of view, even loca- tions raise questions. Strikingly, a set of impor- tant towns appears, Trinidad, Bayamo, Baracoa, etc. Once more a frequent urban fixation ap- pears. Furthermore, some isoseismal maps are provided, the oldest being for the western Cuban 1880 event. Isoseismals of major earth- quakes of the area can be found elsewhere, no- tably for the 1842 Haitian event, encroaching on Cubas’s Oriente, used for the preparation of an «isoseismal model» by Alvarez and Chuy Rodriguez (1985). The same authors (Chuy Ro- driguez and Alvarez, 1988) also supply data on the 1751 and 1770 earthquakes in the Española island. Satisfactory standards are attained by Feuil- lard’s (1988) catalogue of the French islands, using not only former catalogues, like Poey (1857), famous French authors for several time- spans and specific events (like the many books and papers by Moreau de Jonnès, e.g. 1822), and newspapers (to a limited extent), but also a range of original sources, at least the more eas- ily available ones in French archives. While most assessments of intensities seem reliable, there are once more some shortcomings in ap- praisals of macroseismic areas, mostly for smaller events, not only from the end of the 17th and the beginning of the 18th century but also from the 19th century. It should be stressed that this effort has been made by a specialist of instrumental seismology, convinced of the need of a better knowledge and a better use of his- torical information. It is one of the reasons why this pioneering work won wide approval, first, of course, in the French islands. Personally I made intensive research over the years, a costly undertaking indeed, in archives and libraries not only in Santiago de Cuba, Port-au-Prince, Santo Domingo, Sainte- Croix, San Juan, Martinique, Barbados and Cu- raçao, with some results, although mostly limit- ed to events of the second part of the 19th and the first half of the 20th centuries. Most of the research was made in European and North American depositories storing a wealth of not easily accessible or forgotten sources for for- mer events. Most information (some of it could be called «discoveries») was gathered in France and the United States, while a lot of work has still to be done in Great Britain, Copenhagen, etc. Besides other harvests, major events have been revised for Haiti and the Dominican Re- public (1751, 1770, 1842) and the Lesser Is- lands (1690, 1727-1928, 1839, 1843, 1851, 1870, 1897) partly published (Vogt, 1994), for the major part unpublished. Besides, many for- gotten smaller events have been identified, pos- sibly filling «gaps». In a more general way I tried to discuss shortcomings of catalogues for some years, chosen at random, of the mid 19th century (Vogt, 2001a), a complex work going on, al- though slowly, avoiding, of course, poor and/or misleading data banks using to a large extent uncontrolled secondary information. It is too early to assess the degree of craft- manship and originality of a recently announced French data bank for the West Indies and the Caribbean sea (SisFrance-Antilles, 2002), de- scribed as containing 1600 events with their epi- central intensity, 4900 observations and 400 «références documentaires», the latter being a rather small number compared with the figures given for the data bank for France, respectively 5000, 9000 and 9800. Although the fields are not at all comparable, the gap between the figures for «références documentaires» is nevertheless striking, considering the wealth of material available for the West Indies. One can ask, to what extent are these cata- logues, learned papers and the like leading to reinterpretations of events, or to the discovery of forgotten ones? We all should admire people able to propose epicentral intensities of so many events, many of which are reported from only one town or even by one ship’s captain. It should really be an outstanding achievement earning worldwide fame. Here and there it seems that specialists proceeded straight from their stock of catalogues, monographs, newspa- pers, etc., to rather summary data banks, with- 469 A glimpse at the historical seismology of the West Indies major pieces of information. First they should systematically give appraisals of reliability, for the location of epicentres, epicentral intensi- ties, etc., from a judgement founded on an inti- mate knowledge of sources and their where- abouts. In other words it should be the un- avoidable task of those responsible for research and not left to somebody else, with talents for computer work. Furthermore, sources should always be identified in a proper way, to enable checking and possibly reinterpretation by oth- ers. Nowadays I could still echo the following words written about the absence of sources in the mid 19th century by Poey dealing at that time with Cuban earthquakes and storms: «Malheureusement cet abandon a trop souvent lieu parmi les auteurs. On dirait qu’ils craig- nent qu’on puisse y recourir» (Unfortunately, researchers too often abandon sources. It seems that they fear to find new information) (Poey, 1855). Too often data banks escape revision like, in many cases, geological maps. Money spent, work done, epicentres located, intensities as- sessed, magnitudes calculated, etc. New infor- mation brought by historical seismology should not only be incorporated in a rough way, but should sometimes lead to drastic reinterpreta- tion, with, possibly, consequences for seismotec- tonic discussion and appraisal of seismic risk. Besides, let’s insist on the correct sense of two words, among others, that are widely used in a haphazard and misleading way. The word «source» should apply to original records or their faithful copies, translations, summaries and to contemporaneous or later echoes using disappeared or inaccessible primary sources, to be exploited, of course, in a most critical way. Too often unreliable second-hand records and even catalogues are listed under this heading, in a most deceiving way. Similarly the word «archives» too often designates no more than some corpus of documentary material of any kind, including once again, catalogues, while it should be used in a strict sense to indicate gen- uine archive material with its specific problems of research. In a paradoxical way it is some- times used by people without the least idea of what a depository is. In these matters, seismol- ogists need to learn from historians. out bothering with any intermediate stage, at least any accessible one. Actually the main interest is often for major quakes, for instance from intensity VII on, as also in some cases in other parts of the world. A recent discussion of the seismic potential of a part of Cuba takes into account only eight events from 1692 to 1913, a sharp contrast with a wealth of instrumental information for the pe- riod 1979-1989 (Alvarez and Bune, 1978; Chuy et al., 1988; Cotilla et al., 1997). In a large part of the West Indies, as elsewhere, it seems that less important historical earthquakes, even with question marks, could bring suggestions for a better informed seismotectonic discussion and for a better appraisal of the seismic potential at scales different from those of major earth- quakes. Besides, events now considered as mi- nor, e.g., less than degree VII from available in- formation, could in fact turn out, from further research, to be of higher intensity and a kind of Damocles’ sword. Such a remark could apply to events known only from some town and not from the countryside, with possibly, in fact probably, a higher epicentral intensity. In a paradoxical way, even the most impor- tant events are not always fully exploited from a proper seismological and a seismotectonic point of view. Most catalogues and data banks consider only the main shock and possibly one or another important aftershock. It is easily for- gotten that the wealth of sources for several earthquakes is such that whole sequences can be followed, sometimes for months, in a rather precise way. Fine examples are, for instance, the famous earthquakes of 1751, 1770 (Haiti), 1852 (Cuban Oriente) and 1860 (Haiti). Such sequences deserve attention not only for a proper assessment of damage and intensity, but also for a tentative discussion of the migration of epicentres in paleoseismic areas and for the knowledge of types of sequences possibly by comparison with instrumentally known se- quences in the same areas. Such remarks apply mostly to large islands. It is not always easy to distinguish in the Lesser Antilles, with their «island-hopping» problems, shocks belonging to such sequences from specific nearby events. Whatsoever, catalogues and data banks should provide, besides other basic requirements, two 470 Jean Vogt 3. Sample case histories Luckily we know more and more examples of well-balanced convergent efforts by histori- cal seismology and seismotectonic discussion with, in between, instrumental seismology. On- ly two examples from the French islands are given here. Once more we should mention Feuillard’s (1988) «catalogue» with its broad perspective. Later a harmonious collaboration of Bernard and Lambert (1988) led to sizable results, although mostly classical sources, like Sainte-Claire Deville (who produced a lot of publications, e.g. 1861), have been used, with of course unavoidable minor disagreements, here and there, with other sources. But we should avoid general optimism. After a first «renaissance», at the beginning of the 20th century, a long slump, over half a century or even a century, has been described, followed by another «renaissance». Some people think that historical seismology is coming to an end, that most work has been done, with wonderful data banks, while some strange elderly people are going on in a stubborn way. The trend is to jump from micro-seismology to bulldozer work relying, between these extremes, on often hasty, uncritical listings, with sometimes a paradoxical preference for important events. In some parts of the world such workmanship would satisfy the needs of seismotectonic overall interpreta- tion. Actually, despite a lot of achievements, the West Indies are not ready for such a state of mind. While historical seismology question marks have diminished since the seventies they are still numerous, requiring intensive work to gather down-to-earth information and to (re)in- terpret numerous events and their setting. Historical seismology is often used in a nar- row, subordinate way, with a tendency to quan- titative abstraction illustrated by several data banks, while qualitative informations should be of foremost interest, first of all for mastering the complex field of seismo-geological fea- tures. In some cases, in regions with large in- tervals between major events, only centuries- old earthquakes provide arguments for the as- sessment of this essential part of the discussion of seismic risk, the indirect one. Actually, per- sonal work has been devoted to the identifica- tion of cases of liquefaction, rockfalls, etc. in the different geological and geomorphological settings of the Greater and Lesser Antilles, with a wealth of information, still to be located pre- cisely by fieldwork. Many examples were giv- en at the workshop devoted to historical seis- mology at Perpignan in 2002 (Vogt, 2001b; Vogt, 2001c). Besides, specific papers have been devoted to such features for two major earthquakes of the Lesser Antilles (Vogt, 1993a; Vogt, 1995). So only a few examples are given here, with some references. Widespread fissuring and liquefaction oc- curred during the major Jamaican events, fore- most in 1692, with fine, easily interpreted in- formation. So we read in a classical descrip- tion: «... the earth opened in my own parish in multitudes of places and through these chasms spew’d out water to a considerable heigth above ground, in such quantities in some places that it made our gullies run on a suddain, tho’ before exceeding dry... these gaping mouths being no less than 12, 20 or more foot deep under the earth and above two miles up the country, these, especially nigh the river, in the purest mould which had no clay or other consolidating matter beneath to oppose the force of the fountyains of the deep breaking up for where that was we do not find any cracks of the earth at all...» (Anony- mous, 1693). Widespread cracking and liquefac- tion occurred in 1751 and 1770 in the wide Cul- de-Sac plain of Southern Haiti while such fea- tures are described in 1842 in the plain round Le Cap in Northern Haiti. Under different geologi- cal conditions such processes occur only locally, nevertheless in an impressive way. So we hear in 1842 from the mountains of Northern Haiti, near Chatard, that «[...] the earth opened and a clean stream of water spouted forth to the elevation of four feet like an artesian well» (Jamaica Stan- dard, 1842). They are described similarly in 1843 from Nevis, St. Christopher, etc. Some- times the lesson has been heard. So a «liquefac- tion potential map» has been prepared for Puer- to Rico (Windeler et al., 1995). Rockfalls are widespread in many geologi- cal settings, once more in southern Haiti, in the 18th century, also in the Cuban Oriente, but mostly in the Lesser Antilles, for instance in Redonda in 1690, Monserrat in 1843, etc. 471 A glimpse at the historical seismology of the West Indies Further we have a fine knowledge of dis- astrous tsunamis, e.g., in the Virgin Islands in 1867, with a wealth of information, and in northern Haiti in 1842 with precise informa- tion from towns, mostly from Le Cap. Be- sides this, more modest movements of the sea are often reported, for instance on the same coast in 1897. From Saint-Louis-du-Nord we hear that «la mer s’est retirée très loin lais- sant beaucoup de poissons à sec, elle n’est revenue que bien doucement et est entrée jusqu’au milieu du bourg» (Les Antilles, 1887). Many sources discuss the behaviour of dif- ferent types of buildings, the most interesting being the case of mamposteria buildings, a technique using a mixture of materials includ- ing irregular fragments of stone, brick or clay tile with soil and sand. While stone buildings, easily destroyed, are forbidden here and there, timber-built towns are easily burnt during earth- quakes. To my knowledge, a specific paper has not yet been devoted to such discussions and events, although historians have published background information (Luopiès, 1986; Geg- gus, 1990). As an example let’s quote instruc- tions given in 1767 for a Saint-Domingue (nowadays Haiti) sugar plantation: «vous êtes instruit... des malheurs causés dans presque toutes les Antilles par les tremblements de terre. Ce fléau doit vous engager donner à tout ce que vous avez en pierre la plus grande solidité pos- sible. Si les bois étaient plus communs je préférerais cette construction à toute autre, par cette raison qui me fait croire qùelle plus durable et plus propre à y résister...» and, fur- ther: «Je vous réitère la prière que je vous ai déja faite de ne rien épargner pour la sûreté et la solidité...» (Debien, n.d.). Of course psychological and social prob- lems, most important in the Caribbean, arise in earthquake-prone areas. In 1770 prophetic words uttered by a monk, soon expelled, led to some unrest among slaves at Port-au-Prince (Debien, 1979). In 1842 people from the coun- try-side rushed into the destroyed town of Le Cap (Haiti) for systematic robbing, not easily stopped. After such a prediction made in 1906 in Santiago de Cuba a slight shock, seemingly confirming it, and possibly announcing a major earthquake, produced a panic. Even the helpful intervention of the United States Marines in Ja- maica in 1907 led to a political problem. Ultimately these numerous facets of histori- cal seismology could be important contribu- tions for enlarged discussions of earthquake risk and earthquake potential including socio- economic perspectives (Marques et al., 1983). However, earthquakes, whatsoever their cost, whatsoever their potential, are not always the major problem of the Caribbean area. They should be considered in a wider frame includ- ing, most of all, hurricanes. On the other hand sweeping appraisals of natural risks on the whole do not always master major earthquake problems (Cross, 1992). 4. Source materials for future studies Finally let’s have a glimpse at some types of records and depositories, already hinted at here and there, with some examples. They have been discussed in a wider range - West Indies, Central America and some South American countries - at the Trujillo (Venezuela) workshop in 1997 (Vogt, 2002). We will proceed here in a most summary, down-to-earth way, with random ex- amples, among a surprising wealth of hitherto partly unexploited sources of all possible kinds. In the West Indies themselves, archive sources, manuscript or in later editions, are mostly not available for the 18th century. As an example the Records of San Juan’s Cabildo give here and there hints of earthquakes, e.g., in 1786. Most work has to be undertaken in far-off depositories, first of all in Britain and France. So French archives, mainly Archives Na- tionales, keep a wealth of reports on major 18th century earthquakes of Saint-Domingue (Haiti) and the lesser French Islands. Some sources have been printed, officially, for the major Ja- maican event of 1692 (Fortescue, 1901) or oth- erwise, for the 1727 Martinique earthquake (Bruneau-Latouche, 1991), or the 1751 Es- pañola event, from Audiencia de Santo Domin- go files (Archivo Nacional de Cuba, Havana, 18th century). For the 19th century, West Indian deposito- ries are sometimes rewarding. As an example not precisely known (Anonymous, 1830). Sim- ilarly the sequence of April-May 1860, in the South-Western part of Haiti, is best known from such a source, at Les Cayes: «... im Ganzen hat- ten wir 68 deutliche Stösse, ungerechnet die Schwankungen...» (Anonymous, 1860). Even later testimonies are useful. Years after the 1842 event in northern Haiti, a traveller still describes rents, «larges crevasses» in the Vallières moun- tains (Maris, 1860). After many years, sou- venirs are recalled. So a former resident of Mar- tinique, describing the 1776 Oléron (France) earthquake, makes a comparison with his West Indian experience: «... j’ai fait ma résidence pendant vingt ans à la Martinique; j’en ai ressenti quelque fois jusqu’à deux ou trois chaque année, mais je me suis jamais aperçu que les mouvements aient été aussi violents et aussi vifs...» (Journal Historique et Politique, 1776). Clearly he stayed there during a «gap». Similarly a Corsican, a former resident of Haiti, conveys in 1887, the year of the famous Liguri- an earthquake, felt in northern Corsica, these West Indian reminiscences: «J’ai habité longtemps Port-au-Prince... où les tremble- ments de terre sont fréquents et les habitants sont prévenus de ces évènements lorsque les cloches, mises en branle, sonnent d’une cer- taine façon» (Petit Bastiais, 1887). The most informative and precise travellers are often ship’s captains describing shocks felt either in some West Indian harbour or at sea, bringing news to European or North American harbours. A number of such reports are printed by the newspapers of Liverpool, Bordeaux, Le Havre, Bremen, Charleston, Portland, etc., for instance in 1842 and 1843. First-hand reports, often reprinted else- where in extenso, abound in local newspapers with, in the Lesser Antilles, a steady problem of comparison between them, by «island-hop- ping». Unfortunately in the West Indies them- selves, such newspapers, Affiches Américaines (Saint-Domingue, now Haiti), Le Patriote, Sainte-Croix Avis, Saint-Christopher Advertis- er, Dominican, Palladium (St. Lucia), Antigua Weekly Register, Les Antilles, etc., in many cas- es have either disappeared or are not easily con- sultable. It is often preferable and less consum- ing of time and money to look for (of course, 472 Jean Vogt the archives of the Netherlands West Indies in Curaçao have valuable reports on the effects of the 1843 earthquake, for instance on St. Eusta- tius. Of course, official reports are numerous in major British and French depositories. Once more, some of them are printed, for example by the British Parliamentary Papers, for 1843. Most important are consular reports, which, for example, are enlightening for the 1842 Haiti event and the 1867 earthquake and tsunami in Saint-Thomas. Archives of families and traders easily es- cape attention and investigation by specialists. Luckily Debien, a historian, undertook for years a systematic and fruitful search in the archives of French planters families of former Saint-Domingue, bringing precise and useful information on a number of events (Debien, 1941). The diary of a French family from Mar- tinique is a useful source for the 1839 earth- quake (Fremont and Elisabeth, 1984). Surprising finds are possible here and there. So we had the luck to find in a Philadelphia de- pository a fine report by a Leogane notary on damage produced there by the major 1770 Saint-Domingue earthquake. Of course, many such sources have disap- peared. While gaps are sometimes filled in complex, indirect ways other sources are clear- ly lost. As an example let’s quote a seismologi- cal manuscript written by Courgerolles at Le Cap (now Haiti): «... un ouvrage fort étendu, perdu dans le premier incendie du Cap» gath- ering his numerous observations «tant par mes voyages que par mes recherches» (Courg- erolles, 1803). Doubtless he had a fine first- hand knowledge of Saint-Domingue’s seismic activity at the end of the 18th century. Reports by travellers should be exploited in a systematic way. Several describe Saint- Domingue events from the end of the 18th cen- tury. One of them states, at Le Cap: «... se firent sentir graduellement les secousses de l’Est à l’Ouest pendant 39 secondes; plusieurs murs tombèrent et quelques maisons furent lèzardées, des sources furent arrêtées, d’autres parurent; l’église paroissiale fut lègèrement endom- magée...» (Wimpffen, 1797). From a sailor we have a fine knowledge, from Port-au-Prince, of the sequence of March-April 1830, otherwise 473 A glimpse at the historical seismology of the West Indies maica earthquake (Cadbury, 1971). Several newspapers, Church Missionary Gleaner, Mis- sionsblatt, Calwer Missionsblatt, etc., have been exploited. Informing even on mid-18th century events, the Moravian Brothers’ publi- cations are most rewarding. Unfortunately Herrnhut’s German headquarters did not allow access to their archives, which may be a rich resource. Even for well documented events of the beginning of the 20th century, religious echoes are of some interest. Salesians and Je- suits provided papers on the major 1907 Ja- maican earthquake. Reporting on the 1918 Puerto Rico event Die katholische Mission stresses the fact that only the Catholic church was destroyed in Bayamo while the Protestant ones were intact, with comments on the wealth and rivalry of the Protestants. Finally, more or less learned papers, con- temporaneous or later, are of foremost interest. Reports were immediately compiled on the major earthquakes of Haiti 1842 and Cuban Oriente 1852 by local authors, the first being reedited a century later (Márquez, 1842). Be- sides it should not be forgotten that several pa- pers in scientific publications are mainly copies, more or less commented, of informa- tion from newspapers, consular reports, etc., e.g., in Comptes-Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences. Century-old seismological mono- graphs now belong partly to the field of his- torical seismology. A fine example is of course Reid and Taber’s (1919) pioneering paper on the 1918 Puerto-Rican earthquake, a chef d’oeuvre thanks to their broad and modern views. While many reliable sources often give isolated information on minor events, felt for instance at sea, thick files are filled by mate- rial for major earthquakes. Comparison of in- formation of different origin and kinds al- lows a balanced appraisal of different facets of an event, discarding utter catastrophist and misleading views, and allowing modern in- terpretations. A fine example of such a «portfolio» is the 1842 Northern Haiti earthquake, mentioned several times above, with a wealth of reliable sources. These include: testimonies by wit- nesses, for instance by a Haitian general writ- often fragmentary) collections in British, French and North American libraries and/or archives. Luckily the Barbados press has been exploited, partly, by an earthquake researcher, with a fine file left in the island’s archives. Of course historical publications, mainly those of local scope, should be sifted for information given here and there, mostly incidentally, on earthquakes, sometimes from unknown or not easily accessible sources, often filling gaps of knowledge, their authors being not always aware of the worth of their findings. As an ex- ample, chronicles of Santiago de Cuba proved useful despite shortcomings (Baccardi y More- au, 1924), among others, for instance, from Puerto Rico and the French Islands. For a long time proper historical research, in many cases, mentions earthquakes only ca- sually, despite the fact that they act as a kind of catalyst for the knowledge of the wide field of economic and social history. Typically indexes sometimes skip the very word «earthquake». Even the history of art should be consid- ered. So a classical work on the monuments of Santo Domingo is helpful, not only from the proper architectural view of real or possible earthquake effects, but also for tracing sources (Palm, 1955). More or less imaginative pic- tures sometimes illustrate leaflets and learned papers, for instance for the major 1692 Ja- maican event (Cundall, 1936). Later newspa- pers provide illustrations, for instance for the 1867 Saint-Thomas earthquake and tsunami (Illustrated London News, 1867). Works of a more or less encyclopaedic kind also forward valuable information. For Saint- Domingue (now Haiti) the famous Moreau de Saint Méry’s printed or unpublished life-work is a treasure box for hunters of 18th century earthquakes although the information is wide- ly dispersed. Whatsoever the kind of material, archives, newspapers, reminiscences, monographs, his- torical sketches, reports from missionaries and clergy are of particular interest. While psycho- logical and specific religious reactions are of course dealt with at length, numerous valuable and sometimes unique earthquake data are for- warded, mostly from smaller islands. A fine example are quakers’ letters on the 1692 Ja- 474 Jean Vogt ing down reminiscences from his youth (De- lorme, n.d.), the dramatic experience of a British missionary writing an informative «earthquake poem» (Bird, 1870; Eldin, 1878; Monthly Chronicle, 1842), local newspapers like Le Patriote, Le Télégraphe, Le Temps, not easily located, consular reports, foreign news- papers, for instance Portland Adviser and Hamburgischer Correspondent printing ship’s captains reports, etc. Even for small islands like the Turks we are informed in a satisfacto- ry way. Such «portfolios» have been gathered for 1751, 1770, 1843, etc. (Grases, 1990; Vogt, 1997) and partly exploited. 5. Conclusions While specific problems arise in the West Indies (far-off sources, «island hopping», generations of research, different conceptions of catalogues and data banks, too often unsat- isfactorily) their historical seismology illus- trates in a sometimes extreme way more gen- eral issues. A cultural problem is often pres- ent (Vogt, 1993b; Vogt, 1996a; Vogt, 1996b). Authors with a narrow scientific or rather technical mind are not always able to master such a mysterious field, sometimes using un- reliable information with an incredible credulity, not even always using the best, most critical, data banks in a proper way. For instance, one finds epicentral locations mapped indiscriminately from information with different degrees of reliability; barycen- tres are plotted irregardless that they are prone to drastic relocation from a newly dis- covered source or a reinterpretation. Further it should not be forgotten that here and there da- ta banks are elaborated by people unable to master either genuine historical seismology, with cases of drastic misinterpretation, or ad- vanced seismology. Besides the weight of shortcomings, not all of the numerous valu- able arguments and suggestions given by his- torical seismology are properly implemented for the needs of seismology as a whole, for in- stance the analysis of earthquake sequences. Consequences could be disastrous in the case of the West Indies, with their major events, often at large intervals, easily forgotten, and seismic gaps. Despite the work done so far, over-research is not yet a problem for the his- torical seismology of the West Indies. REFERENCES ARCHIVO NACIONAL DE CUBA, HAVANA (18th century): Audi- encia Real de Santo Domingo, documents reproduced in a publication edited by Sociedad Dominicana de Sis- mología e Ingeniería Sísmica, s.d., Santo Domingo. ACOSTA SEGURA, R. (1987): Terremotos en República Do- minicana: causas, consecuencias y medidas preventi- vas, Santo Domingo, pp. 218. ACOSTA SEGURA, R. (n.d.): Actividad sísmica de la falla de San José de Ocoa y sus influencias en la frecuencia sís- mica de la región sur de la Isla de Santo Domingo (Universidad de Santo Domingo). ALVAREZ, L. and T. CHUY RODRIGUEZ (1985): Isoseismal model for Greater Antilles in Proc. of the 3rd Interna- tional Symposium on the Analysis of Seismicity and Seismic Risk, Liblice Castle, Czechoslovakia, 17-22 June, 134-141. ALVAREZ, L. and V. I. BUNE (1978): Seismic risk estimation of SE Cuba, Phys Solid Earth, 13, 10, 712-721. ALVAREZ GOMEZ, J. L. (1989): Epicentros de terremotos; 1904-1982, in Nuevo Atlas Nacional de Cuba, (Acad. Cienc. Cuba, Havana, Cuba). ANONYMOUS (1693): Truest and largest account of the late earthquake in Jamaica, 7 June 1692, London, pp. 26. ANONYMOUS (1830): Tremblement de terre à Saint- Domingue, Nouvelles Annales des Voyages et des Sci- ences Géographiques, voyageurs français et étrangers, Paris, Tome Troisième, 125-126. ANONYMOUS (1860): Erdbeben in Haiti. Zeitschrift für all- gemeine Erdkunde, Gesellschaft für Erdkunde zu Berlin. BACCARDI Y MOREAU, E. (1924): Crónica de Santiago de Cuba, Madrid (2nd edition, 1973). BERNARD, P. and J. LAMBERT (1988): Subduction and seis- mic hazard in the Northern Lesser Antilles: Revision of the historical seismicity, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 78, 1965-1983. BIRD, M. B. (1870): The earthquake: in memory of depart- ed worth. Illustrating ... the great doctrine of a partic- ular providence in the entire overthrow of the city of Cape Haytien... May the 7th, 1842, etc. [in verse.] (C. Le Feuvre, Jersey), pp. 114. BRUNEAU-LATOUCHE, E. (1991): Après le tremblement de terre de novembre 1727 à la Martinique, Cahiers du Centre de Genéalogie et d’Histoire des Isles d’Amérique, Paris. CADBURY, H.J. (1971): Quakers and earthquakes at Port- Royal 1692, Jamaica Hist Rev. CHUY RODRIGUEZ, T. J. and L. ALVAREZ (1988): Sismicidad Histórica de la Española, Comunicaciones Cientificas sobre Geofísica y Astronomía, Instituto de Geofísica y Astronomía, Academia de Ciencias de Cuba, pp. 22. CHUY RODRIGUEZ, T. J., B. GONZALEZ and B. POLO (1988): Algunos criterios sobre la peligrosidad sísmica de la 475 A glimpse at the historical seismology of the West Indies región occidental de Cuba, Comunicaciones sobre Ge- ofísica y Astronomía, 5, pp. 19. CHUY RODRIGUEZ, T. J. (1989): Epicentro de terremotos por datos macrosismicos 1551-1983 y isositas de terremo- tos, in Nuevo Atlas Nacional de Cuba (Acad. Cienc. Cuba, Havana, Cuba). COTILLA, M., L. ALVAREZ, H. J. FRANZKEE and M. RUBIO (1997): Potenciales sísmicos del arco de las Antillas Mayores, Revista Geofísica del Instituto Panamericano de Geografia e Historia, 46, 129-150. COURGEROLLES, M. (1803): Addition aux observations sur les tremblements de terre et la position des volans, Journal de Physique, de Chimie, d’Historie Naturelle et des Arts, Paris ,Tome LVII, An XI, 119-125. CROSS, J. A. (1992): Natural hazards within the West Indies, J. Geog., 91 (5), 190-199. CUNDALL, F. (1936): The Governors of Jamaica in the Sev- enteenth Century (The West India Committee, Lon- don), pp. 177. DEBIEN, G. (1941): Une plantation de Saint-Domingue: la sucrerie Galbaud du Fort, 1690-1802, Notes d’Histoire Coloniale, Cairo, 1, pp. 136. DEBIEN, G. (n.d.): Plantations et esclaves à Saint- Domingue-Sucrerie Cotineau, Notes d’Histoire Colo- niale, Port-au-Prince, n. 66. DEBIEN, G. (1979): La crainte des assemblées d’esclaves à Port-au-Prince au lendemain des tremblements de terre de 1770 (Conjonctures). DELORME, D. (n.d.): 1842 au Cap-Tremblement de Terre (Port-au-Prince). ELDIN, F. (1878): Haiti: Treize ans de Séjour aux Antilles (Toulouse), pp. 246. FEUILLARD, M. (1988): Macro-sismicité de la Guadeloupe et de la Martinique (Observatoire Volcanologique de la Soufrière, Guadeloupe). FORTESCUE, J. W. (1901): Calendar of State Papers. Colo- nial Series, America and the West Indies, 1689-1692 (London). FREMONT, P. DE and L. ELISABETH (1984): Pierre Dessalles ... La vie d’un colon à la Martinique au XIX e siècle. Journal 1837-1841. GEGGUS, D. P. (1990): Urban development in 18th century: Saint-Domingue, Bulletin du Centre d’Histoire des Es- paces Atlantiques. GRASES, J. (1990): Terremotos Destructores del Caribe, 1502- 1990 (UNESCO-RELACIS, Montevideo), pp. 132. Illustrated London News (1867). Jamaica Standard (1842), June 6. Journal Historique et Politique (1776). KELLEHER, J., S. LYNN and O. JACK (1973): Possible criteria for predicting earthquake locations and their applica- tion to major plate boundaries of the Pacific and the Caribbean, J. Geophys. Res., 78 (14), 2547-2585. Les Antilles (1887), November 26: News from Saint-Marc. LUOPIÈS, P. (1986): Le modèle urbain colonial au XVIIIe siècle - La maison et l’habitat au Cap Français et à Port-au-Prince, in Proc. of the Fourth French-Irish Seminar of Social and Economic History, edited by P. BUTEL and L.M. CULLEN (Dublin). MALLET, R. (1853-1855): Catalogue of recorded earth- quakes from 1606 B.C. to A.D. 1850, Brit. Ass. Rep., 1853, 1-176; 1854, 118-212; 1855, 2-236. MARIS, M. (1860): Souvenirs d’Amerique, Relation d’un voyage au Texas et en Haiti, Bruxelles. MARQUES, M.E., J. R. HERNANDEZ, T. CHUY and A. VENEREO (1983): The geodynamic polygon of Santia- go de Cuba; a scientific and socio-economic perspec- tive (Abstract), Tectonophysics, 97 (1-4), 17. MÁRQUEZ, J. R. (1842): Terremoto en la Isla de Haiti o Suce- sos Memorables del Día 7 de Mayo 1842 (reprinted by Sociedad Dominicana de Bibliofilos, 1976, Santo Domin- go). MARTINEZ BARRIOS, D. (1946): Consideraciones sobre la historia sísmica de la República Dominicana, Publica- ciones de la Universidad de Santo Domingo, vol. 44, pp. 26. Monthly Chronicle (1842): Earthquakes at St. Domingo. MOREAU DE JONNÈS, A. (1822): Histoire physique des An- tilles Françaises, savoir: la Martinique et les Iles de la Guadeloupe, etc. (Paris), vol. 1. NUEVO ATLAS NACIONAL DE CUBA, (1989): Acad. Cienc. Cuba, Havana, Cuba. PALM, E.W. (1955): Los Monumentos arquitectónicos de la Española, Editora de Santo Domingo, Sociedad Do- minicana de Bibliófilos, Colección de cultura domini- cana, Santo Domingo, 53, pp. 630. PERREY, A. (1846): Sur les tremblements de terre aux An- tilles 1530-1846, Mém. Acad. Des Sciences de Dijon, 325-392. Petit Bastiais (1887), February 24. POEY, A.M. (1855): Supplément au tableau chronologique des tremblements de terre ressentis à l’île de Cuba de 1551 a 1855, Nouvelles Annales de Voyages, de la géo- graphie, de l’historie et de l’archéologie, Paris, Tome Troisième, 286-325. POEY, A.M. (1857): Catalogue chronologique des tremble- ments de terre ressentis dans les Indes-Occidentales de 1530 à 1857, accompagné d’une Revue bibli- ographique contenant tous les travaux relatifs aux tremblents de terre des Antilles, Annuaire de la Société Météorologique de France, t.5, 2 partie, Bullettin des Séeances, 75-127. REID, H.F. and S. TABER (1919): The Porto Rico earth- quakes of October-November 1918 [Puerto Rico]; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 9, 95-127. REID, H.F. and S. TABER (1920): The Virgin Islands earth- quakes of 1867-1868, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 10, 9- 30. ROBSON, G.R. (1964): An earthquake catalog for the East- ern Caribbean, 1530-1960, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 54, 785-832. RUTTEN, L. and B. RADSHOOVEN (1940): On earthquake epi- centers and earthquake shocks between 1913 and 1938 in the region between 0° and 30°N and 56° and 120°W, Verhandelingen del Nederlandsche Akademie van Wetenschappen, Afdeeling Natuurkunde, 2e Sectie, XXXIX, n. 4. SAINTE-CLAIRE DEVILLE, C. (1861): Recherches sur les principaux phénomènes de metéorologie et de physique terrestre aux Antilles. SALTERAIN Y LEGARRA, P. (1884): Ligera reseña de los tem- blores de tierra ocurridos en la Isla de Cuba, Anales Acad., Ciencias de Cuba, vol. 21, 203-218. SCHERER, J. (1911): Les grands tremblements de terre de l’île d’Haiti, Bulletin Sémestriel de l’Observatoire Météorologique du Séminaire-Collège St. Martial, 476 Jean Vogt Port-Au-Prince, Haiti, Janvier - Juin, pp. 58-75. SCHERER, J. (1912): Great earthquakes in the island of Haiti, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 2, 161-180. SISFRANCE-ANTILLES (2002): Histoire et caractéristiques des séismes ressentis aux Antilles Françaises et dans l’archipel des Caraïbes, in SISFRANCE (on line: www.sis- france.net). TABER, S. (1922): The seismic belt of the Greater Antilles, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 12, 199-219. TOMBLIN, J. M. and G. R. ROBSON (1977): A catalogue of felt earthquakes for Jamaica, with references to other islands in Greater Antilles, 1564-1971, Special Publication – Ja- maica, Mines and Geology Division, 2, pp. 243. UTRERA, C. DE. (1978): Santo Domingo – Dilucidaciones Históricas, vol. 1. VOGT, J. (1993a): Effets naturels des séismes; l’exemple du séisme antillais de 1690, Rev. Géomorphol. Dyn., 42 (1), 11-14. VOGT, J. (1993b): Historical seismology – Some notes on sources for seismologist in Historical investigations of European earthquakes-Materials of the CEC Project Review of Historical Seismicity in Europe, Milano, vol. 1, pp. 15-24. VOGT, J. (1994): Révision de deux séismes des Petites An- tilles: 1839 et 1951, Rev. Géomorphol. Dyn., 43 (4), 135-143. VOGT, J. (1995): Les effets sur la nature du séisme antillais de 1843, Cahiers d’Outre-Mer. VOGT, J. (1996a): The weight of pseudo-objectivity, Ann. Geofis., XXXIX (5), 1005-1011. VOGT, J. (1996b): Insuffisances flagrantes de la transmis- sion du savoir en matière de sismologie historique, in La Transmission des Savoirs Scientifiques (Comité des Travaux Historiques et Scientifiques). VOGT, J. (1997): Deux séismes majeurs de Saint- Domingue au XVIIIe siècle (1751 et 1770), in Primeras Jornadas de Sismicidad Histórica en Venezuela, Trujillo (Venezuela), 15-16 May 1997 (oral communication). VOGT, J. (2001a): Sismicité historique des Petites Antilles. Un test pour quelques années du milieu du XIXe siècle, in The Use of Historical Data in Natural Hazards As- sessment, edited by T. GLADE, P. ALBINI and F. FRANCES, Adv. Nat. Technol. Hazards Res. (Kluwer, Dordrecht), vol. 17, 29-33. VOGT, J. (2001b): Les Effets sur la Nature de Seismes Majeurs des Grandes et des Petites Antilles, APS (in press). VOGT, J. (2001c): Natural features of major Hispaniola eathquakes, in 2nd Workshop of the ESC Working Group «Historical Seismology», Vienna (Austria), 22- 23 June 2001 (oral communication). VOGT, J. (2002): Types de sources de sismologie historiques du Nord de l’Amérique du Sud, d’Amérique centrale et des Antilles, in Workshop «Investigating the records of past earthquakes», 21st Course of the Int. School of Geophysics, EMFCSC, Erice (Italy), 1-7 July 2002, (oral communication). WIMPFFEN, Baron de (1797): Voyage à Saint-Domingue pendant les années 1788, 1789 et 1790 (Paris), vol. 1. WINDELER, D.S. et al. (1995): Seismic zonation in Puerto Rico, in Proceedings of the 5th International Confer- ence on Seismic Zonation, Nice.