173_184 Benedetti.pdf 173 ANNALS OF GEOPHYSICS, VOL. 46, N. 2, April 2003 Giorgio Fiocco: a jolly good fellow and his research Glauco Benedetti-Michelangeli (*), Marco Cacciani (1), Anna Capasso (2), Fernando Congeduti (3), Tatiana Di Iorio (1), Alcide G. di Sarra (1) (4), Daniele Fuà (1) (5), Gerald Grams (6), George Magyar (*), Giandomenico Pace (1) and Guido Visconti (7) (1) Dipartimeno di Fisica, Università di Roma «La Sapienza», Roma, Italy (2) Uffi cio Stampa, CNR, Roma, Italy (3) Istituto di Scienze dell’Atmosfera e del Clima, Sezione di Roma, Italy (4) ENEA, CLIM-OSS, S. Maria di Galeria, Italy (5) DISAT, Università di Milano-Bicocca, Milano, Italy (6) Atlanta University, Atlanta, GA, U.S.A. (7) Dipartimento di Fisica, Università dell’Aquila, Italy Abstract In celebrating the 70th birthday of Giorgio Fiocco we recall that his scientifi c production includes some pioneering work in a number of fi elds where he set important milestones. In particular, several of his papers represent the fi rst published evidence in certain fi elds and triggered such a large fl ow of research, new developments and new paper production that the original source is almost forgotten. Here the topics where his contribution was of pioneering importance are briefl y recalled and his original works cited. Mailing address: Prof. Daniele Fuà, Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Roma «La Sapienza», P.le Aldo Moro 2, 00185 Roma, Italy; e-mail: fua@g24ux.phys.uniroma1.it Key words atmosphere - lidar - aerosol 1. Introduction Since his thesis at the Faculty of Engineering of the University of Rome, Giorgio Fiocco has been extremely active in several fi elds of both Engineering and Physics. Here we do not need to acknowledge his already high visibility in the Italian and international academic and scientifi c community: his authority is well recognized by his participation in many committees and panels, as well as his affi liation in academies, scientifi c societies and, last but not least, his past positions as head of important research institutions (director of the former Institute of Atmospheric Physics, IFA, of the National Research Council, CNR, and president of the Italian Space Agency, ASI). Affi rming that most people involved in atmospheric physics all over the world know who Giorgio Fiocco is is not an overstatement. According to one of Fiocco’s basic teachings that «quality is more important than quantity», his paper production is not as heavy (in a literal sense) as that of other colleagues in the physical sciences although it still numbers an outstanding 300 or so. Here we recall that among his scientifi c production one can fi nd some pioneering work in a number of fi elds where he set important milestones. In particular, several of his papers represent the fi rst published evidence in some fi elds and triggered such a large fl ow of research, new developments and new paper production that the original source is almost forgotten.(*) «Retired». 174 Glauco Benedetti-Michelangeli et al. The main aim of this paper written for cele- brating his 70th birthday is to settle this point: to recall briefl y the topics where the contribu- tion of Giorgio Fiocco was of pioneering impor- tance and cite his original works which confi rm his primacy in order to reaffi rm the true paternity of some ideas and techniques accepted world- wide. 2. Great Britain Fiocco had just graduated as an Electrical Engineer in 1956; what could he become if not an employee of one of the «diamond tips» in the electronics industry at that time: the Marconi Company. The fact that i) going abroad for a job at that time was not common (during the Italian economic «boom» of the late fi fties, job opportunities at home were abundant), ii) the choice of the U.K. was even less com- mon for Italians and iii) the choice of working for the fi rm founded by a very famous and brilliant Italian inventor, may or may not be relevant. Surely it was the fi rst (and, probably not easy) step forward in view of his next big jump overseas. The facts are that he was right away involved in advanced research in Radar and navigation- al aid systems and his contribution was such that some of his discoveries were patented for Marconi (Fiocco,1958a-e, 1959a-e; Adam and Fiocco, 1959). Being in private industry, his contributions at that time are published as Internal Reports. Moreover, most of the discoveries and devel- opments which were the ultimate thing at that time, are probably nowadays outdated by any of the computer chips that control our kitchen appliances (on the relationship between the sci- entifi c knowledge of different generations of stu- dents, in this same issue, there is an interesting essay by L. Smullin, a teacher and good friend of Fiocco’s). Of his «science» there, we, friends and at- mospheric physicists, do not have much record. What we believe is that Marconi’s, like England, was the training entrancehall where Fiocco fi rst came in touch with the true, «dirty» world and its fascinating applied sciences after his book-based university years. Since then the enchantment of such devices as Radars, able to sense far objects, never left him and always spurred his knack for practical and brilliant solutions to new and challenging problems. In particular, he was interested in a deeper understanding of what professional radar people consider noise but is indeed the atmospheric signature. At that time it probably occurred to Giorgio Fiocco that studying the source of the radar noise could become a new branch of the geophysical sciences. 3. United States We must face it that to be successful in scientifi c research it is not often suffi cient to be talented, one needs certain amount of luck: to be at the right place at the right time. This was the case in the laser fi eld in the early sixties. The fi rst laser was constructed in 1960 in the U.S. During the next 2-3 years various types of lasers, laser effects and applications were discovered or invented, each of which became the foundation of a whole new research fi eld. Two of these were associated with the name of Giorgio Fiocco. He, like many young European researchers, went to the United States in order to perfect his research skills and learn the latest techniques. One of the outstanding professors of the Electrical Engineering Department at MIT was Louis Smullin, formerly a member of the Ra- diation Laboratory of the same university where the microwave Radar had been developed. Smullin chose young Fiocco to set up an active optical instrument able to measure the distance from the Moon: one of the fi rst optical radar or LIDAR (acronym for LIght Detection And Ranging, an obvious readjustment of the acronym RADAR, RAdio Detection And Ranging). When one considers how diffi cult is was to observe a few photons of laser light refl ected from the lunar surface without the benefi t of the retro-refl ector placed much later on the Moon by astronauts, everybody can appreciate the sense of humor in the chosen code name used for the lunar ranging program - «Project Luna See» sounds 175 Giorgio Fiocco: a jolly good fellow and his research like «project lunacy». After struggling with electronics that nowadays can be seen only in science museums, they got the fi rst light pulses echoed from a half Moon during three nights of May 1962. The news was soon highlighted in newspapers all over the world (it made the fi rst page in the New York Times); in particular, the scientifi c report was published in the outstanding journal Nature (Smullin and Fiocco, 1962). Next came the application of laser pulses to diagnose a plasma by Thomson scattering (Fiocco and Thompson, 1963). The advantages of laser light are: negligible disturbance of the plasma, high spatial and temporal resolution (a very short laser pulse is used), remoteness from the plasma. At the same time, the laser beam is suffi ciently powerful to produce observable effects. In the case of the Thomson scattering the originally narrow spectrum becomes broadened after interacting with the hot electrons of the plasma. The broadening is directly proportional to the temperature and the amount of light scattered depends on the plasma density, thus providing information on the two most important parameters of a plasma while the centroid of the spectrum provides a measurement of the radial bulk velocity of the medium. Lasers became the standard diagnostic tools for fusion plasmas all over the world, fi nding many other applications, but Fiocco’s was indeed the pioneering paper. In the experiments by Fiocco and Smullin (Fiocco and Smullin, 1963), laser echoes from the mesosphere were tentatively attributed to incoming micrometeorites (Fiocco and Colombo, 1964). The presence of aerosol layers near or below the mesopause has been established by numerous visual observations of noctilucent clouds. Fioc- co and Grams (1966, 1969) conducted lidar measurements at high latitudes where noctilucent clouds are observed. Observations of transient features of a noc- tilucent cloud were also obtained during that experiment. Fiocco and Grams (1971) related latitudinal and seasonal changes in the vertical distribution of extraterrestrial particles below 100 km to the general circulation of the upper atmosphere. Estimates of the mass fl ux of extra- terrestrial dust based on lidar data obtained at high latitudes (Fiocco and Grams, 1969) are in agreement with results obtained by other tech- niques (summarized, for example, by Parkin and Tilles, 1968). It is interesting to recall that volcano Agung was timely enough, in 1963, to explode and inject into the atmosphere dust and gases, that would form in the lower stratosphere the liquid and solid targets to be detected by Giorgio Fiocco’s lidars. The first application of lidars to study the stratospheric aerosol layer was the work of Fiocco and Grams (1964). The lidar could rapidly acquire backscattering profiles of the layer of aerosols found in the interval from 15 to 25 km. These observations permitted the study of short- term temporal variations in the aerosol layer. Stratospheric aerosol observations were made with a lidar operated at Lexington, Massachusetts, during 1964 and 1965 (Grams and Fiocco, 1967). Some observations were also conducted at College, Alaska, in the summer of 1964. Vertical profi les of aerosol concentration were obtained by dividing the backscattering coefficients measured with the lidar echoes by the expected return from a molecular atmosphere. The lidar «scattering ratios» introduced by Fiocco and Grams have been used extensively by other lidar groups since that time. Other large volcanoes (St. Helens, in 1980; El Chichón, in 1984, and Pinatubo, in 1991) exploded during the following years, all at the right time to be monitored by lidar, and to prompt important research on stratospheric composition, dynamic, chemistry and radiation. The work at Marconi’s with Doppler Radars probably also triggered the idea that such technique applied to lidars would have made it possible to detect the velocity of the small light scatterers present in the atmosphere. In case such scatterers were large and dragged by the air, their average velocity would be equal to the wind velocity; if the scatterers were air molecules, their velocity distribution would be directly related to the gas temperature. The theoretical treatment of such phenomenon is extensively developed in an often cited paper of Fiocco and a bright young student: Fiocco and De Wolf (1968). At the same time he started working at the way to measure such properties in the laboratory. The fi rst devices were built in the U.S. but soon he was called by ESRIN in the laboratory of Frascati and he was allowed to carry with him many of the already constructed devices. 176 Glauco Benedetti-Michelangeli et al. It is worth mentioning that in those fi rst years at MIT, Fiocco conceived and literally designed for the laboratory a sort of optical «Meccano» that all his co-workers know very well. With the aid of a score of different modular pieces (a compromise between metric and anglo-american sizes but always perfectly fitting) precisely machined in anticorodal, bronze and steel on the original drawings of Fiocco, it has been possible, since then, to construct any kind of optical system. Such versatility is hardly found even in catalogues of important optics producers. Several of his former co-workers, who have continued their work in atmospheric optics by themselves, are still using Fiocco’s «Meccano». 4. Italy, Frascati As mentioned above, in 1969 Fiocco was called back to Italy to set up a group of atmospheric physics at ESRIN, a child laboratory of ESRO, born with great auspices that soon faded under the weight of diplomatic-political questions. The fact that ESRIN was in the neighborhood of Rome, famous for an inexplicably too abundant production of low-quality wine, has probably nothing to do with what happened next, but the laboratory eventually turned out to be quite short lived. One of its merits is that its wealth of funds, space and facilities, was the defi nitive bait that brought Giorgio Fiocco back to Italy. If it were not for that outstanding laboratory, Fiocco would probably still be in the U.S. The Doppler effect on visible radiation had been known by astronomers since the begin- ning of the 20th century but the involved veloci- ties were very high and the famed «red shift» of the expanding universe was easily studied. Conversely, the velocities involved in atmos- pheric physics requires a quite high instrument resolution not easily achieved. The apparati like Radars which use radio frequencies that have the advantage of keeping their coherence, solve the problem by mixing the signal with a reference oscillator (homo- or hetero-dyne technique). Such technique shifts the frequency of the signal to be analyzed to a much lower range where the required resolution is more easily reached. Applying the same technique to optical frequencies is possible (and indeed is done) but has several limitations. Giorgio Fiocco at that time took the «ultimate decision» that put him for good on one of the two exclusive parties of the lidar community: on one side the «coherent» Doppler lidar guys who use the mixing technique and on the other, the «incoherent» Doppler lidar guys who perform the analysis of the raw signal without any mixing. The effort from the second party to discourage being nicknamed «incoherent» by demonstrating that their method utilizes somehow light coher- ence as well, has gone unheard to date. Here, for sake of impartiality (which is not the case because some of us belong to this very side), the denigrating defi nition «incoherent technique» is called «direct detection technique». The application of the direct detection technique for measuring the atmospheric tem- perature and wind, proposed and published for the fi rst time by Fiocco, is based on the spectral scanning of the lidar echo signal with a very high resolution interferometer. Fiocco’s idea was original also in proposing the use of an interferometer known in the hyperfi ne spectroscopy community but otherwise seldom used: the Fabry-Perot etalon. Typically a Fabry- Perot used to study hyperfi ne transition lines in laboratory experiments where there is abundance of signal has a diameter of 2'' or less; Giorgio Fiocco had special 4'' plates made and coated for him with very high precision by a U.K. glass manufacturer. He designed from scratch also the mechanics that held the plates and made possible the frequency scanning either piezoelectrically or by pressure change. In a search for the optimum light transmittance (although Fiocco, talking to his junior co-worker would often say that «optimum is the enemy of good»), with G. Benedetti-Michelangeli, he dug out of the books an even more obscure spectro- scopic device: the spherical Fabry-Perot invented and studied by Connes (1958). At very high resolutions needed for the Doppler technique it can be demonstrated that confocal mirror cavities have a great advantage over at mirror cavities. He and his team made a whole series of different spherical Fabry-Perot cavities with impressive resolutions that allowed the measurement of the wind velocity with such accuracy to compute 177 Giorgio Fiocco: a jolly good fellow and his research the turbulent eddy diffusion coeffi cient in the boundary layer. The papers written in those years are the fi rst record of utilizing the lidar Doppler technique in the atmosphere (Fiocco et al., 1971; Benedetti- Michelangeli et al., 1972, 1974). Many years later when the lidar Doppler technique became a fashionable sort of topic in the international scientifi c community, the main problems invol- ved were still the same and Fiocco had some solutions to suggest for following the drift of a laser line (Zuccheretti et al., 1992). As with the two kinds of Fabry-Perot inter- ferometers, he took another little known idea from the books and set it into use. An astronomer from Bologna Observatory, G. Horn-D’Arturo, had thought that instead of having a very ex- pensive large area telescope built, he could use an array of properly made small telescopes (Horn-D’Arturo, 1935). The idea comes from the observation that due to the extreme diffi culty of making large precise optical surfaces, the cost of many small mirrors was by far less than the cost of a large mirror with the same total area. At that time, mirror arrays were already used for solar furnaces or other non-optical grade applications, here the point was to obtain a tele- scope good for astronomers and, in the case of Fiocco, good for a lidar. Incidentally this idea is still valid and seems one of the better solutions for large telescopes in space. In 1973, the 3 m mosaic telescope made of 36 hexagonal mirrors in a 12 m high tower adjacent the ESRIN laboratory started to collect the fi rst lidar echoes from the stratosphere. A unique facility in the world. After going through few lifting jobs and passing from ESRIN to the Italian National Research Council (CNR), it worked and produced a fair amount of scientifi c results up to a few years ago (1999) when the laboratories were moved to a new site and the relocation of the tower was not considered economically viable. The building and some of the steel innards are still there like an old pharaoh’s monument. As previously mentioned, in 1980 Mt. St. Helens exploded, and in 1984 so did the volcano El Chichón. In the period following the eruptions, most of the lidars all around the world made measurements of the aerosol distribution and evolution in the stratosphere. The lidar in Frascati made measurements (Adriani et al., 1983), that were also used as ground truth for the Stratospheric Aerosol and Gas Experiment II (Ackerman et al., 1988). Studies on the interactions between aerosol and ozone in the stratosphere were also conducted (Adriani et al., 1987). In the early to mid-1970s, Fiocco was a fre- quent visitor at the National Center for Atmos- pheric Research (NCAR) at Boulder, Colorado, where he worked with the «ol’ good times» and great friend Gerry Grams on a series of papers involving the energetic equilibrium of small par- ticles in the Earth’s upper atmosphere. Aerosols absorb energy from the solar and planetary radiation fi elds, exchange energy by collisions with the ambient gas, and emit thermal radiation. Interactions with the atmospheric radiation fi eld is a function of size and refractive index of the particles and of the spectral density and anisotropy of the radiation fi eld. The heat exchanged through collisions is a function of the temperature and density of the ambient gas and of the temperature of the particles. Equilibrium conditions for any given particle size and composition are thereby functions of the altitude, time of day, season, and planetary albedo. Equilibrium particle tem- peratures can be substantially different from the ambient gas temperature; Fiocco et al. (1975) showed that the effects could be very large above 60 km where differences in excess of 100 K could be obtained in daytime. These differences could account for substantial increases in the sublimation rates of certain species (Fiocco and Visconti, 1973) and for a reduction in the altitude interval where ice particles could exist in the mesosphere (Grams and Fiocco, 1977). The identifi cation of the role of aerosol on the atmospheric heating and on the photodissociation rates treated in those years with different colleagues (Fiocco et al., 1974, 1976, 1978; Mugnai et al., 1978, 1979; Petroncelli et al., 1980) constitutes one of the many fun- damental contributions to the understanding of the atmospheric processes. At the same time, he dedicated some ef- forts to the development of acoustic sounders (Mastrantonio and Fiocco, 1982), to the charac- terization of the atmospheric boundary layer (Fiocco and Mastrantonio, 1983), and to the combination of different techniques (Congeduti et al., 1981). 178 Glauco Benedetti-Michelangeli et al. In his neverending search for literally «pioneering» challenging measurements, he deployed in person and with other adventurous co-workers an acoustic sounder on a ship cruising the Red Sea and, later, on one of the highest possible sites in Europe: Capanna Margherita on top of Mt. Rosa (4400 m a.s.l.). In the same years of ESRIN Fiocco, using his expertise in optical spectroscopy, stud- ied the properties of few minor atmospheric components such as OH (Fiocco et al., 1970; Visconti and Fiocco, 1970, 1973; Fiocco and Grams, 1971; Visconti et al., 1971; Fiocco and Visconti, 1973, 1974). 5. Italy take 2: Rome In 1984, Fiocco started a new laboratory in the Department of Physics of the University of Rome. The fi rst experiment in the laboratory was dedicated to the measurement of the ozone absorption cross section in the ultraviolet spectral range (Cacciani et al., 1989), and, later, in the visible (Amoruso et al., 1990). Of particular interest was the dependence on temperature. These measurements had been carried out by few groups previously. The small differences among the published measurements had a signifi cant impact on the ozone values retrieved from the surface and from space: the change of the ozone absorption, mostly in the Huggins bands, with wavelength, is used to derive total and vertical profi les of ozone by remote sensing. The apparatus developed at the University of Rome used a long absorption path and high ozone concentrations to measure very low absorption cross sections. One of the most challenging aspects of the experiment was the ability to produce a relatively large amount of ozone: it was produced by a high voltage discharge in a pure oxygen gas, and stored in the liquid phase at the liquid nitrogen temperature. Even the smallest impurity could start a fast reaction, leading to noisy explosions famous throughout the Department of Physics. The ozonizer had to be rebuilt several times before all the measurements could be completed. Later on, measurements were extended also to NO2, a gas easier to handle than ozone (Amoruso et al., 1993). At the same time, experiments on the detec- tion of small changes of the refractive index of air were carried out with a Michelson inter- ferometer (Crescentini and Fiocco, 1988). The spectroscopic measurements were then moved to the Gran Sasso Laboratory. This large laboratory, built in the inner part of the Gran Sasso Mountain, 100 km east of Roma, shielded by approximately 1000 m of rock, is mainly de- dicated to experiments in nuclear physics and astrophysics. At the time of the construction of the laboratory it was possible to foresee the use of some of the service tunnels for geophysical experiments (Fiocco et al., 1986). One of such experiments had to do with the deformation of rocks (Crescentini et al., 1997) and the detection of relatively slow phenomena like tides. For this purpose a Michelson 90 m long interferometer was ideal. The interferometer beams were to travel in a vacuum system. In addition to the geophysical metrology, the existence of a 90 m long pipe was useful for spectroscopy. To allow detailed measurements of very low absorption cross sections, a multi-pass cell was developed, and measurements of the O2 absorption in the Herzberg continuum were carried out (Amoruso et al., 1995, 1996). At the University, of Rome, Giorgio Fiocco started to develop the lidars that were later deployed to different parts of the world forming something half-jokingly dubbed as the «small but global lidar network». These projects will be described later in this paper. At the same time, different experiments, including measurements on the boundary layer with a combination of different techniques (sodar, lidar, radiometers, etc.) were carried out (Rao et al., 1995; Casa-dio et al., 1996a,b; Rao et al., 2002). In one of his pioneering studies, he suggested that clouds of different nature, possibly con- taining chemical compounds other than water (namely nitric acid), may form at the tropical tropopause (Crescentini and Fiocco, 1983; Hamill and Fiocco, 1988). Some of these stud- ies were done well before the discovery of the ozone hole, and of the different properties and compositions of polar stratospheric clouds. The possible role of the condensation of nitric acid in cloud particles in the tropical regions was then evoked much later. 179 Giorgio Fiocco: a jolly good fellow and his research 6. South Pole When the Italian government signed the Antarctic Treaty and offi cially joined the in- ternational program for research in Antarctica setting forth a call for proposals, Giorgio Fiocco did not wait long to deliver another original and challenging idea: the installation of a lidar at the Amundsen-Scott South Pole, station to monitor the presence of Polar Stratospheric Clouds (PSC’s) during the austral winter. The Antarctic «ozone hole» phenomenon had been just confi rmed by satellite measurements and theories implying the role of such clouds in the modifi cation of the chemical reactions in the stratosphere were being proposed. The project was not very simple; it implied the design of a reliable lidar system able to run without failures and as little as possible human attendance for several months. In particular, during the winter closure of the South Pole base, when the 10-20 personnel are mainly involved in staying healthy and safe, the only thing that can be required of the person in charge is throwing off and on a couple of switches. Any more technical intervention is out of the question. Such a sys- tem needs to be thoroughly tested in the labora- tory, disassembled, transported to the site, re- assembled, optically aligned and re-tested. The project started at the beginning of 1987 at the University of Rome with the aim of deploying the lidar around the following December; the lidar system was completely built from scratch, starting from the acquisition of the laser with a special cooling unit, to the construction of the telescope and the assembly of the electronics. In particular, the electronics, as was usual at that time, was made of a chain of different units originally designed for research in particle physics; the adjustment to a lidar system was not always simple. No need to say that it was a «tour de force» and not all the desirable tests were performed within the deadlines. Fiocco himself and his co-workers, within a collaboration with the U.S. National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and the National Research Council (NRC), brought along 400 kg of equipment to the South Pole just before Christmas 1987, spent memorable holidays in the «southernmost place on Earth» and set up the lidar ready for measurements during the austral winter of 1988. Flying to the Amundsen-Scott station with the well maintained but quite old C-130 propeller airplanes with skis as landing gear is itself a pioneering deed and, even if well sheltered, whoever experienced the Antarctic katabatic winds knows it well. Beside the extreme cold, the South Pole is remarkable also for its height above sea level: more than 2600 m of geometrical altitude but, at those temperatures, equivalent to more than 3000 m according to ambient pressure. Giorgio Fiocco liked the adventure very much but did not like the height feeling and in his worries he enjoyed, in particular, the friendly reassurance of the base doctor. Such a close and somehow «interested» reassuring friendship with a doctor was seen again in another remote base where Fiocco went to deploy another of his lidars: U.S. Air Force Base of Thule, Greenland. The fi rst Antarctic campaign was mainly a test for the instrument but still a few data were collected. In the following years the instrument was maintained and updated and was able to work till 1995 when the project was discontinued and the lidar was brought back to Rome. The collection of a rich and unique data set on PSC’s allowed the publication of a fair amount of papers on several related topics (Fiocco et al., 1989, 1991, 1992, 1996; Fuà et al., 1992; Cacciani et al., 1993, 1997a,b; Panegrossi et al., 1996). In particular the paper of 1991 that encountered a strong criticism from the referees but was eventually published, presented a rather original and controversial way of interpreting the temperature dependence of PSC’s to infer their chemical composition. Following the eruption of Mt. Pinatubo (1991), it was possible to study the impact of the presence of a large amount of sulfate aerosol in the lower stratosphere on the formation and properties of the PSC’s (Cacciani et al., 1997b). 7. Thule In 1990, within a collaboration with the Danish Meteorological Institute a lidar was installed at Thule, Greenland. The lidar was designed to observe the upper troposphere and 180 Glauco Benedetti-Michelangeli et al. the stratosphere. Later the capability to make daytime observations, and to measure temperature profi les in the middle atmosphere, was added. The observations at Thule allowed the increasing and subsequent decaying phases of the stratospheric aerosol load formed by the eruption of volcano Pinatubo to be studied (Di Girolamo et al., 1994; Larsen et al., 1994; Neuber et al., 1994; Di Sarra et al., 1998a). The aerosol backscattering shows an evident annual cycle, induced by the polar vortex but also the infl uence of the large scale stratospheric circulation, mainly the Quasi- Biennal Oscillation. Following previous studies conducted after the eruptions of Mt. Agung (Grams and Fiocco, 1967) and El Chichón (Adriani et al., 1987), an investigation of the relationship between volcanic aerosol and ozone in the lower stratosphere at Thule was also car- ried out (Di Sarra et al., 1992, 1995). The Arctic vortex strongly modulates the ozone and aerosol profi les, that display sudden changes with height, and an anti-correlated layered structure. A similar behavior had also been observed between PSC’s and ozone at the South Pole (Fiocco et al., 1989). PSC’s appeared occasionally also at Thule (Di Sarra et al., 2002). Starting from 1993, temperature measure- ments were also collected at Thule (Marenco et al., 1997) and later a study was dedicated to the effects of small cirri at the summer Arctic tropopause (Benedetti et al., 1997). 8. A lidar in the island of Lampedusa In 1999, the group led by Giorgio Fiocco installed a lidar for tropospheric aerosol studies at the Station for Climate Observations of the «Ente Nazionale per le Nuove Tecnologie, l’Energia e l’Ambiente» (ENEA) on the small and pleasant island of Lampedusa, placed between South Italy and Africa. The main objective of the measurements was the detection of desert dust transport over the Mediterranean. The desert dust strongly modifi es the atmospheric structure, with large loads of crustal particles, that may reach altitudes of 7-8 km. The lidar observations (Di Sarra et al., 2001a) were carried out in combination with an extended set of other instruments, leading to the identifi cation of the radiative effects (mainly in the ultraviolet spectral range) induced by the aerosol (Di Sarra et al., 2001b). 9. An airborne lidar As the South Pole project was approaching its completion, Giorgio Fiocco, in his search for new and challenging experiences, began to develop an airborne lidar which would be installed onboard the scientifi c version of the Myasishchev strato- spheric aircraft M-55, Geophysica. The lidar was named ABLE (AirBorne Lidar Experiment). ABLE is a completely automated, medium-power lidar capable of operating in an unpressurized, cold environment such as that of Geophysica, observing in the nadir and in the zenith direction. The development of this kind of instrument that works in very extreme ambient conditions requires considering different problems and constraints: weight, strength, thermal stresses, low pressure, humidity condensation are just few of the problems faced in the process. Giorgio Fiocco was totally at ease spending hours in front of the drawing board trying all kind of solutions or discussing with the ever present machinist on the way to fi nish a part of the lidar. Little by little, a jewel of aluminium looking like a fancy space object blossomed in the laboratory. We should mention also the frequent, tiring, neverending and babilonian (languagewise) meeting with the team of Russian engineers in charge of the aircraft. In summer of 1996, the mock-up of ABLE was installed for the fi rst time on the M-55, which took off from Zukhovsky airport, Russia, in order to check how ABLE would behave in real fl ight conditions. In fact, the Geophysica usually fl ies at 20 km forcing ABLE to work at pressure of 50 mb (one twentieth of atmospheric pressure at sea level) and at a temperature ranging between 190-200 K (approximately 80° below freezing point) (Fiocco et al., 1999). In winter 1996-1997, ABLE was fl own to Rovaniemi, Finland, which had been selected as the base for the fi rst measurement campaign of Geophysica. The campaign was named APE- POLECAT (Airborne Polar Experiment-Polar Ozone, Lee waves, Chemistry And Transport) (Stefanutti et al., 1999; Pace et al., 2003a). 181 Giorgio Fiocco: a jolly good fellow and his research Then other campaigns followed: APE-THESEO (Airborne Platform Experiment - THird European Stratospheric Experiment on Ozone) based at the airport of Victoria-Mahé, Seychelles (Pace et al., 2003b), APE-GAIA (Geophysica Aircraft In Antartica) based at the airport of Ushuaia in Terra del Fuoco, Argentina, EUPLEX (EUropean Polar stratospheric cloud and LEe wave Experiment) based at Kiruna (Sweden) and the ENVISAT (ENVironment SATellite) validation campaign based at Forlì (Italy) and at Kiruna (Sweden). The location of Ushuaia permitted the aircraft to fl y across the polar vortex down to the Antarctic peninsula approaching 70° south. It is noteworthy that during the campaign in the Seychelles, in order to support the operation of ABLE and acquire independent ground based lidar observations of high equatorial cirrus clouds also a twin lidar housed in a container was deployed: CABLE, a self contradicting acronym originating from the words «Container» plus «ABLE». The «small but global lidar network» still rising! Fiocco is now participating in the proposal to fl y a lidar in the International Space Station in a complex venture with Livio Scarsi called EUSO and described in one of the papers of this issue. Recently, the external and internal structure of the receiver of ABLE has been totally re- designed and built to reduce its weight and make it resemble more a submarine robot. We all believe that the fi nal goal of this small but complex lidar system is to fl y sometimes in a space payload, but nobody is offi cially stating it because changing the «A» with another meaningful utterable letter is too diffi cult. The ABLE project is still going on and absorbs much of Giorgio Fiocco’s time (and research funds): it is indeed the present enjoyable toy and needful thing of such a good ol’ fellow. REFERENCES ACKERMAN, M., C. BROGNIEZ, B. DIALLO, G. FIOCCO, G.P. GOBBI, M. HERMAN, M. JAEGER, J. LENOBLE, C. LIPPENS, C. MEGIE, J. PELON, R. REITER and R. SANTER (1988): European validation of SAGE II aerosol profi les, J. Geophys. Res., 94, 8399-8411. ADAM, A.M. and G. FIOCCO (1959): Automatic device for following an assigned course, Marconi’s Co., Baddow Res. Lab., ITM 598. ADRIANI, A., F. CONGEDUTI, G. FIOCCO and G.P. GOBBI (1983): One-year lidar observations of the stratospheric aerosol layer following the El Chichón eruption, Geophys. Res. Lett., 10, 1005-1008. ADRIANI, A., G. FIOCCO, G.P. GOBBI and F. CONGEDUTI (1987): Correlated behaviour of the aerosol and the ozone content of the stratosphere after the El Chichón eruption, J. Geophys. Res., 92, 8365-8372. AMORUSO, A., M. CACCIANI, A. DI SARRA and G. FIOCCO (1990): Absorption cross sections of ozone in the 590- to 610-nm region at T = 230 K and T = 299 K, J. Geophys. Res., 95, 20,565-20,568. AMORUSO, A., L. CRESCENTINI, G. FIOCCO and M. VOLPE (1993): New measurements of the NO2 absorption cros- section in the 440-to 460-nm region and estimates of the NO2-N2O4 equilibrium constants, J. Geophys. Res., 98, 16,857-16,863. AMORUSO, A., L. CRESCENTINI and G. FIOCCO (1995): Long- base-line multiple refl ection cell for UV and visible spectroscopy, Rev. Sci. Instrum., 66, 4824-4826. AMORUSO, A., L. CRESCENTINI, M.S. COLA and G. FIOCCO (1996): Oxygen absorption cross-section in the Herzberg continuum, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer, 56, 145-152. BENEDETTI, A., A. DI SARRA, G. FIOCCO and D. FUÀ (1997): Cirrus clouds at Thule, Greenland, during summer: lidar observations and infl uence on the planetary radiative budget, in IRS ’96, Current Problems in Atmospheric Radiation, edited by W.L. SMITH and K. STAMNES (A. Deepak, Hampton, Va), 23-26. BENEDETTI-MICHELANGELI, G., F. CONGEDUTI and G. FIOCCO (1972): Measurements of aerosol motion and wind velocity in the lower troposphere by Doppler optical radar, J. Atmos. Sci., 29, 906-910. BENEDETTI-MICHELANGELI, G., F. CONGEDUTI and G. FIOCCO (1974): Determination of vertical eddy diffusion parameters by Doppler optical radar, Atmos. Environ., 8, 793-799. CACCIANI, M., G. DI SARRA, G. FIOCCO and A. AMORUSO (1989): Absolute determination of the cross sections of ozone in the wavelength region 339-355 nm at tem- peratures 220-293 K, J. Geophys. Res., 94, 8485-8490. CACCIANI, M., P. DI GIROLAMO, A. DI SARRA, G. FIOCCO and D. FUÀ (1993): Volcanic aerosol layers observed by lidar at South Pole, September 1991-June 1992, Geophys. Res. Lett., 20, 807-810. CACCIANI, M., G. FIOCCO, P. COLAGRANDE, P. DI GIROLAMO, A. DI SARRA and D. FUÀ (1997a): Lidar observations of polar stratospheric clouds at the south pole. 1. stratospheric unperturbed conditions, 1990, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 12,937-12,943. CACCIANI, M., P. COLAGRANDE, A. DI SARRA, D. FUÀ, P. DI GIROLAMO and G. FIOCCO (1997b): Lidar observations of polar stratospheric clouds at the south pole. 2: stratospheric perturbed conditions, 1992 and 1993, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 12,945-12,955. CASADIO, S., A. DI SARRA, D. FUÀ, M.P. RAO and G. FIOCCO (1996a): Raman lidar and Doppler sodar observations of the nocturnal boundary layer at Rome, Italy, during 1994 and 1995, in Advances in Atmospheric Remote Sensing with Lidar, edited by A. ANSMANN, R. NEUBER, 182 Glauco Benedetti-Michelangeli et al. P. RAIROUX and U. WANDINGER (Springer-Verlag, Berlin), 27-30. CASADIO, S., A. DI SARRA, G. FIOCCO, D. FUÀ, F. LENA and M.P. RAO (1996b): Convective characteristics of nocturnal urban boundary layer observed with Doppler sodar and Raman lidar, Boundary Layer Meteorol., 79, 375-391. CONGEDUTI, F., G. FIOCCO, A. ADRIANI and C. GUARRELLA (1981): Vertical wind velocity measurements by a Doppler lidar and comparisons with a Doppler sodar, Appl. Opt., 20, 2048-2054. CONNES, P. (1958): L’etalon de Fabry-Perot sphèrique, J. Phys. Radium, 19, 262. CRESCENTINI, L. and G. FIOCCO (1983): Possible effects of stratospheric aerosol layers on the vertical transport of water, Nuovo Cimento, 6C, 337-349. CRESCENTINI, L. and G. FIOCCO (1988): Automatic fringe recognition and detection of subwavelength phase perturbations with a Michelson interferometer, Appl. Opt., 27, 118-123. CRESCENTINI, L., A. AMORUSO, G. FIOCCO and G. VISCONTI (1997): Installation of a high-sensitivity laser strainmeter in a tunnel in Central Italy, Rev. Sci. Instrum., 68, 3206- 3210. DI GIROLAMO, P., M. CACCIANI, A. DI SARRA, G. FIOCCO and D. FUÀ (1994): Lidar observations of the Pinatubo aerosol layer at Thule, Greenland, Geophys. Res. Lett., 21, 1295-1298. DI SARRA, A., M. CACCIANI, P. DI GIROLAMO, G. FIOCCO, D. FUÀ, B. KNUDSEN, N. LARSEN and T.S. JØRGENSEN (1992): Observations of correlated behaviour of stratospheric ozone and aerosol at Thule during winter 1991-1992, Geophys. Res. Lett., 19, 1823-1826. DI SARRA, A., M. CACCIANI, G. FIOCCO, D. FUÀ, T.S. JØRGENSEN, B. KNUDSEN, N. LARSEN and I.S. MIK- KELSEN (1995): Ozone and aerosol correlated obser- vations at Thule, Greenland, in the period 1991-1994, J. Geophys. Res., 100, 25,965-25,977. DI SARRA, A., L. BERNARDINI, M. CACCIANI, G. FIOCCO and D. FUÀ (1998a): Lidar observations of the Pinatubo aerosol at Thule, in Greenland: relationships with the polar vortex, in Atmospheric Ozone, edited by R. BOJKOV and G. VISCONTI, Parco. Sci. Tecnol. d’Abruzzo, L’Aquila, Italy, 197-200 DI SARRA, A., L. BERNARDINI, M. CACCIANI, G. FIOCCO and D. FUÀ (1998b): Stratospheric aerosol observed by lidar over Northern Greenland in the aftermath of the Pinatubo eruption, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 13,873-13,891. DI SARRA, A., T. DI IORIO, M. CACCIANI, G. FIOCCO and D. FUÀ (2001a): Saharan dust profiles measured by lidar at Lampedusa, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 10,335-10,347. DI SARRA, A., M. CACCIANI, M. CAMPANELLI, P. CHAMARD, C. CORNWALL, J. DELUISI, L. DE SILVESTRI, T. DI IORIO, P. DISTERHOFT, G. FIOCCO, D. FUÀ, P. GRIGIONI, W. JU N K E R M A N N, F. MA R E N C O, D. ME L O N I, F. MONTELEONE and B. OLIVIERI (2001b): Radiation, ozone, and aerosol measurements at Lampedusa during the PAUR II Campaign, in IRS 2000: Current Problems in Atmospheric Radiation, edited by W.L. SMITH and YU.M. TIMOFEYEV (A. Deepak Publishing, Hampton, Virginia), 1193-1196. DI SARRA, A., M. CACCIANI, G. FIOCCO, D. FUÀ and T.S. JØRGENSEN (2002): Lidar observations of polar stratospheric clouds over Northern Greenland in the period 1990-1997, J. Geophys. Res., 107 (AAC6), 1-16. FIOCCO, G. (1958a): Comparison of some published data on sea and land reectivity, Marconi’s Co., Baddow Res. Lab., ITM 299. FIOCCO, G. (1958b): Notes on integrated Doppler-inertia navigational systems, Marconi’s Co., Baddow Res. Lab., ITM 342. FIOCCO, G. (1958c): A method of evaluating and correcting for calibration errors in Doppler navigational systems, Marconi’s Co., Baddow Res. Lab., ITM 352. FIOCCO, G. (1958d): A method of range determination using FM, Marconi’s Co., Baddow Res. Lab., ITM 391. FIOCCO, G. (1958e): Echoes from rain in Doppler navigational systems, Marconi’s Co., Baddow Res. Lab., ITM 394. FIOCCO, G. (1959a): A note on the use of harmonic bands of high order in FM Doppler systems, Marconi’s Co., Baddow Res. Lab., ITM 434. FIOCCO, G. (1959b): FM altimeter; a preliminary investigation, Marconi’s Co., Baddow Res. Lab., ITM 555. FIOCCO, G. (1959c): British Patent 871656, improvements in or relating to Doppler Radar Systems, British Patent Offi ce. FIOCCO, G. (1959d): British Patent 869809, improvements in or relating to Radar Systems, British Patent Offi ce. FIOCCO, G. (1959e): British Patent 869808, improvements in or relating to Radar Systems, British Patent Offi ce. FIOCCO, G. and G. COLOMBO (1964): Optical radar results and meteoric fragmentation, J. Geophys. Res., 69, 1975. FIOCCO, G. and B.J. DE WOLF (1968): Frequency spectrum of laser echoes from atmospheric constituents and determination of the aerosol content of air, J. Atmos. Sci., 25, 488-496. FIOCCO, G. and G.W. GRAMS (1964): Observations of the aerosol layer at 20 km by optical radar, J. Atmos. Sci., 21, 323-324. FIOCCO, G. and G.W. GRAMS (1966): Observations of the upper atmosphere by optical radar in Alaska and Sweden during the summer of 1964, Tellus, 18, 34-38. FIOCCO, G. and G.W. GRAMS (1969): Optical radar observations of mesospheric aerosols in Norway during the summer 1966, J. Geophys. Res., 74, 2453-2458. FIOCCO, G. and G.W. GRAMS (1971): On the origin of noctilucent clouds: extraterrestrial dust and trapped water molecules, J. Atmos. Terr. Phys., 33, 815-824. FIOCCO, G. and G. MASTRANTONIO (1983): Characters of the air fl ow inferred from detailed spectral analysis of acoustic sounder echoes, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 74, 1861-1865. FIOCCO, G. and G. VISCONTI (1973): On the seasonal variation of upper atmospheric sodium, J. Atmos. Terr. Phys., 35, 165-171. FIOCCO, G. and G. VISCONTI (1974): Simultaneous meas- urements of the OH* nightglow in the (9-4), (8-3) and (5-1) bands and effects of quenching, J. Atmos. Terr. Phys., 36, 583-590. FIOCCO, G. and L.D. SMULLIN (1963): Detection of scattering layers in the upper atmosphere (60-140 km) by optical radar, Nature, 199, 1275-1276. 183 Giorgio Fiocco: a jolly good fellow and his research FIOCCO, G. and E. THOMPSON (1963): Thomson scattering of optical radiation from an electron beam, Phys. Rev. Lett., 10, 89. FIOCCO, G., G. VISCONTI and F. CONGEDUTI (1970): Nocturnal variation of the intensity and rotational temperature of the OH(8-3) band in the airglow, Nature, 228, 1079. FIOCCO, G., G. BENEDETTI-MICHELANGELI, K. MAISCHBER- GER and E. MADONNA (1971): Measurement of tem- perature and aerosol-to-molecule ratio in the troposphere by optical radar, Nature, 229, 78-79. FIOCCO, G., D. FUÀ and G. VISCONTI (1974): Origin of the upper Atmosphere Na from sublimating dust: a model, Annal. Geophys., 30, 517-528. FIOCCO, G., G. GRAMS and G. VISCONTI (1975): Equilibrium temperatures of small particles in the Earth’s upper atmosphere (50-110 km), J. Atmos. Terr. Phys., 37, 1327-1337. FIOCCO, G., G. GRAMS and A. MUGNAI (1976): Energy ex- change and temperature of aerosols in the Earth’s atmosphere (0-60 km), J. Atmos. Sci., 33, 2415-2424. FIOCCO, G., A. MUGNAI and W. FORLIZZI (1978): Effects of radiation scattered by aerosols on the photodissociation of ozone, J. Atmos. Terr. Phys., 40, 949-961. FIOCCO, G., G. VISCONTI and G.P. CATALANO (1986): Interferometria laser per la misura delle deformazioni della crosta terrestre: progetto della Stazione del Gran Sasso, Nuovo Saggiatore, 2, 25-27. FIOCCO, G., W. KOMHYR and D. FUÀ (1989): Is ozone destroyed during the Antarctic polar night in the presence of polar stratospheric clouds?, Nature, 341, 426-427. FIOCCO, G., D. FUÀ, M. CACCIANI, P. DI GIROLAMO and J. DELUISI (1991): On the temperature dependence of polar stratospheric clouds, Geophys. Res. Lett., 18, 424-427. FIOCCO, G., M. CACCIANI, P. DI GIROLAMO and D. FUÀ (1992): Stratospheric clouds at South Pole during 1988: 1. Results of lidar observations and their relationship to temperature, J. Geophys. Res., 97, 5939-5946. FIOCCO, G., M. CACCIANI, A. DI SARRA, D. FUÀ, P. CO- LAGRANDE, G. DE BENEDETTI, P. DI GIROLAMO and R. VIOLA (1996): The evolution of the Pinatubo stratospheric aerosol layer observed by lidar at South Pole, Rome, Thule: a summary of results, in The Effects of the Mt. Pinatubo Eruption of the Atmosphere and Climate, edited by G. FIOCCO, D. FUÀ and G. VISCONTI, NATO/ASI Series. FIOCCO, G., P.G. CALISSE, M. CACCIANI, S. CASADIO, G. PACE and D. FUÀ (1999): ABLE: development of an airborne lidar, J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol., 16, 1337-1344. FUÀ, D., M. CACCIANI, P. DI GIROLAMO, G. FIOCCO and A. DI SARRA (1992): Stratospheric clouds at South Pole during 1988. 2: their evolution in relation to atmospheric structure and composition, J. Geophys. Res., 97, 5947-5952. GRAMS, G.W. and G. FIOCCO (1967): The stratospheric aerosol layer in 1964 and 1965, J. Geophys. Res., 72, 3497-3542. GRAMS, G.W. and G. FIOCCO (1977): Equilibrium tempera- tures of spherical ice particles in the upper atmosphere and implications for noctilucent cloud formation, J. Geophys. Res., 82, 961-966. HAMILL, P. and G. FIOCCO (1988): Nitric acid aerosols at the tropical tropopause, Geophys. Res. Lett., 15, 1189- 1192. HORN-D’ARTURO, G. (1935): Primi esperimenti con lo specchio a tasselli, Pubbl. Oss. Bologna, Vol. III, n. 3. LARSEN, N., B. KNUDSEN, T.S. JØRGENSEN, A. DI SARRA, D. FUÀ, P. DI GIROLAMO, G. FIOCCO, M. CACCIANI, J.M. ROSEN and N.T. KJOME (1994): Backscatter measurements of stratospheric aerosols at Thule during January-February 1992, Geophys. Res. Lett., 21, 1303- 1306. MARENCO, F., A. DI SARRA, M. CACCIANI, G. FIOCCO and D. FUÀ (1997): Thermal structure of the winter middle atmosphere observed by lidar at Thule, Greenland, during 1993-94, J. Atmos. Terr. Phys., 59, 151-158. MASTRANTONIO, G. and G. FIOCCO (1982): Accuracy of wind velocity determinations with Doppler sodars, J. Appl. Meteorol., 21, 823-830. MUGNAI, A., G. FIOCCO and G. GRAMS (1978): Effects of aerosol optical properties and size distributions on heating rates induced by stratospheric aerosols, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 104, 783-796. MUGNAI, A., P. PETRONCELLI and G. FIOCCO (1979): Sen- sitivity of the photodissociation of NO2, NO3, and H2O2, to the solar radiation diffused by the ground and by atmospheric particles, J. Atmos. Terr. Phys., 41, 351-359. NEUBER, R., G. BEYERLE, G. FIOCCO, A. DI SARRA, K.H. FRICKE, C. DAVID, S. GODIN, L. STEFANUTTI, G. VAUGHAN and J.P. WOLF (1994): Latitudinal distribu- tion of stratospheric aerosols during the EASOE winter 1991/92, Geophys. Res. Lett., 21, 1283-1286. PACE, G., M. CACCIANI, P.G. CALISSE, A. DI SARRA, G. FIOCCO, D. FUÀ, L. RINALDI and S. CASADIO (2003a): Observation of polar stratospheric clouds with the ABLE lidar during the APE-POLECAT fl ight of January 9, 1997, Aerosol Sci. (in press). PACE, G., M. CACCIANI, A. DI SARRA, G. FIOCCO and D. FUÀ (2003b): Lidar observations of equatorial cirrus clouds at Mahé, Seychelles, J. Geophys. Res. (in press). PANEGROSSI, G., D. FUÀ and G. FIOCCO (1996): A 1D model of the formation and evolution of polar stratospheric clouds, J. Atmos. Chem., 23, 5-35. PARKIN, D.W. and D. TILLES (1968): Influx measurements of extraterrestrial material, Science, 159, 936-946. PETRONCELLI, P., G. FIOCCO and A. MUGNAI (1980): An- nual variation of the effects of diffuse radiation on the photodissociation of ozone, Pure Appl. Geophys., 118, 20-34. RAO, M.P., S. CASADIO, G. FIOCCO, F. LENA, M. CACCIANI, P.G. CALISSE, A. DI SARRA and D. FUÀ (1995): Ob- servation of lump structures in the nocturnal atmos- pheric boundary layer with Doppler sodar and Raman lidar, Geophys., Res. Lett., 22, 2505-2508. RAO, M.P., S. CASADIO, G. FIOCCO, M. CACCIANI, A. DI SARRA, D. FUÀ and P. CASTRACANE (2002): Estimation of atmospheric water vapor fl ux profi les in the nocturnal unstable urban boundary layer with Doppler sodar and Raman lidar, Boundary Layer Meteorol., 102, 39-62. SMULLIN, L.D. and G. FIOCCO (1962): Optical echoes from the Moon, Nature, 194, 1267. 184 Glauco Benedetti-Michelangeli et al. STEFANUTTI, L., A.R. MACKENZIE, S. BALESTRI, V. KHAT- TATOV, G. FIOCCO, E. KYROE and T. PETER (1999): Airborne Polar Experiment-Polar ozone, Leewaves, Chemistry, and Transport (APE-POLECAT): rationale, road map and summary of measurements, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 23,941-23,959. VISCONTI, G. and G. FIOCCO (1970): Sodium twilight emission measured with a tilting fi lter photometer, Pure Appl. Geophys., 9, 2517. VISCONTI, G. and G. FIOCCO (1973): Increase of Na twilight emission after the Earth’s crossing of the orbital planes of Comets Halley and Encke, J. Atmos. Terr. Phys., 35, 353-356. VISCONTI, G., F. CONGEDUTI and G. FIOCCO (1971): Fluc-tuations in the intensity and excitation tempera- ture in the OH airglow (8-3) band, in The Radia- ting Atmosphere, edited by B.M. MCCORMAC (D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland), 82-89. ZUCCHERETTI, E., D. FUÀ and G. FIOCCO (1992): A laser- slaved piezo-controlled Fabry-Perot interferometer, Rev. Sci. Instr., 63, 2940-2944.