683_698 Collettini 23_1.pdf


ANNALS OF GEOPHYSICS, VOL. 45, N. 5, October 2002

683

Hypothesis for the mechanics and seismic
behaviour of low-angle normal faults:
the example of the Altotiberina fault

Northern Apennines

Cristiano Collettini
Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Università degli Studi di Perugia, Italy

Abstract
Widespread mapping of low-angle normal faults in areas of former continental extension continues to prompt
debate as to whether such structures may be seismically active at very low dips (δ < 30°) in the upper continental
crust. The Northern Apennines provide an example where an active low-angle normal fault (Altotiberina fault,
ATF) can be studied. A set of commercial seismic reflection profiles plus deep boreholes have been used to
constrain the geometry of the fault at depth. These data have been integrated with a microseismic survey showing
that part of the microseismicity (M < 3.0) is consistent with the geometry of the ATF as imaged by depth converted
seismic reflection profiles. Frictional fault mechanics under Byerlee’s friction coefficient and vertical σ

1
 (constrained

from the inversion of the focal mechanisms) defines the peculiar condition for reactivation of the ATF: small
values of differential stress, σ

1
− σ

3
 < 28 MPa, relatively high value of tensile strength of the fault surrounding

rocks (T ~10 MPa) and tensile fluid overpressure P
f
 > σ3 (i.e. λv > 0.93). The short-lived attainment of Pf > σ3 along

small fault portions, in an area characterised by large amounts of CO2, account for the microseismic activity
located along the ATF, which occurs on rupture surfaces in the range of 10–1− 10–3 km2.

1.  Introduction

The Northern Apennines consist of a NE
verging thrust-fold belt formed as the result of
the collision between the European continental
margin (Sardinia-Corsica block) and the Adriatic
microplate (e.g., Alvarez, 1972; Reutter et al.,

Mailing address: Dr. Cristiano Collettini, Dipartimento
di Scienze della Terra, Università degli Studi di Perugia,
Piazza dell’Università 1, 06100 Perugia, Italy; e-mail:
colle@unipg.it

Key  words  Northern Apennines – friction – normal
faults – microseismicity – fluid pressure

1980). NE migration of compression is asso-
ciated with hinterland extension. Geological and
geophysical data locate the compressional front,
presently active close to the Adriatic coast and
the extensional active front near the axial zone
of the Northern Apennines (fig. 1). The presence
of adjacent sectors of compression and extension
(Lavecchia et al., 1994; Mariucci et al., 1999)
and the migration with time of the compression-
extension pair from the Tyrrhenian sea to the
present position can find a possible explanation
in the rollback and retreat of a subducting slab
(Reutter et al., 1980; Royden and Karner, 1984;
Doglioni, 1991; Keller et al., 1994).

The extending sector is characterised by a
widespread high heat flow, more than 90 mW/m2

(Mongelli and Zito, 1991), long-wavelength



684

Cristiano Collettini

positive Bouguer gravity anomaly, ~ 30-40
mGals, (Marson et al., 1998), a widespread flux
of CO

2
, likely to be related to mantle degassing

(Chiodini et al., 2000), a shallow lithosphere/
asthenosphere boundary, ~ 50 km deep (Suhadolc
and Panza, 1989) and a shallow Moho, 20-25
km deep (Ponziani et al., 1995).

The development of extensional deformation
within the Northern Apennines is well known
(Elter et al., 1975), but the asymmetric character
of extension has been only recently revealed. The
CROP 03 deep seismic reflection profile (Pialli
et al., 1998), which crosses the Northern Apen-
nines from the Tyrrhenian to the Adriatic coast,

shows that extension within the brittle upper crust
is accommodated by a set of major ENE-dipping
LANFs, bounding syntectonic basins, associated
with antithetic high-angle normal faults (fig. 1).
Continuous migration of extension from west to
east is well constrained by the age of the syn-
tectonic basins (fig. 1). Extension started in the
western part of Tuscany during the Tortonian,
then migrated eastward and now is active in the
axial zone of the Northern Apennines.

In this paper: 1) the easternmost of these
LANFs, the Altotiberina fault (ATF) which is
located in the seismically active Umbria region,
has been studied by using seismic reflection

Fig.  1.  Schematic crustal-scale cross section along the CROP 03 (Barchi et al., 1998a). The profile shows that
part of the extension is accommodated by upper-crust, east-dipping LANFs. The extensional processes in the
Tyrrhenian Sea and Tuscany have been active enough to favour exhumation accompanied with high heat flow,
positive Bouguer gravity anomaly, a shallow Moho, deep release of CO

2
. Migration of extension from the Tyrrhenian

coast to Umbria as calibrated by the time-space evolution of the syntectonic basins (data from seismic reflection
profiles Barchi et al., 1998b; Pascucci et al., 1999). In the active region crustal thinning is continuing. Crustal
structure is from the CROP 03 (Barchi et al., 1998a), heat flow (Mongelli and Zito, 1991), gravity anomaly
(Marson et al., 1998), CO2 release (Chiodini et al., 2000). The position of the Moho is calibrated by deep seismic
refraction profiles (Ponziani et al., 1995).



685

Hypothesis for the mechanics and seismic behaviour of low-angle normal faults

profiles and seismological data; 2) the Anderson-
Byerlee frictional fault mechanics along with the
debate related to the LANF argument is exten-
sively revisited; 3) a mechanical model, invoking
the local attainment of dramatic fluid over-
pressures is proposed to explain the microseismic
activity of the ATF.

2.   Active extensional faults in Umbria

Extensional tectonics has been affecting
the Umbria region since the upper Pliocene
(Ambrosetti et al., 1978). Extension is accom-
modated by NNW-SSE trending normal faults
which bound syntectonic basins (fig. 2). The
Tiber basin, infilled by fluvio-lacustrine upper
Pliocene-Quaternary syntectonic sediments, is
the wider basin of the area and has a longitudinal
continuity of more than 100 km. East of the
Tiber basin, the axial zone of the Northern
Apennines is characterised by intramountain
basins possessing sub-polygonal shape and
relatively little longitudinal continuity (Gubbio,
Gualdo Tadino, Colfiorito, Norcia, Castellucio).
In the intra-mountain area the SW dipping (50°-
70°) basin-bounding faults severely affect the
topography and show an extensional kinematics
close to pure dip-slip (Lavecchia et al., 1994;
Boncio et al., 1996; Collettini, 2001).

2.1.  Seismic images of normal faults

Seismic reflection profiles provide a powerful
tool to investigate the geometry of the faults up
to the seismogenic depth and comparison with
seismological data help much to discriminate the
active systems.

The subsurface setting of the area has been
studied by interpreting and converting to depth
a set of nine seismic reflection profiles (Barchi
et al., 1999): eight commercial profiles, provided
by ENI/AGIP division, and the CROP 03 deep
seismic reflection profile (see location in fig. 2).
The stratigraphy of the study area consists
schematically of four major lithological units,
from top to bottom: Miocene Turbidites, Jurassic-
Oligocene Carbonates, Triassic Evaporites,
Permian-Triassic Phyllitic Basement. The

seismic profiles show at least four main seismic
markers, calibrated on boreholes data (Bally et al.,
1986; Anelli et al., 1994), that can be traced
throughout the region and correspond to: Bisciaro

Fig.  2.  Schematic structural map of the Umbria re-
gion. The map is derived from the compilation of
available data and original geological surveys.
Instrumental seismicity 5.6 < M

w
 < 6.0: 1 - September

19, 1979, Norcia earthquake M
w
 = 5.8; 2 - April 24,

1984, Gubbio earthquake M
w
 = 5.6; 3 - September 26,

1997, 00.33, Colfiorito earthquake M
w
 = 5.7;

4 - September 26, 1997, 09.40, Colfiorito earthquake
M

w
 = 6.0; 5 - October 14, 1997, Sellano earthquake

M
w
 = 5.6. Focal mechanism solutions 1, 3, 4 and 5

CMT; 2 Westaway et al. (1989). Historical seismicity
(Boschi et al., 1999) with epicentral intensity greater
than IX on the Mercalli-Cancani-Sieberg scale (MCS):
a - April 30, 1279, Camerino earthquake; b - December 1,
1328, Norcia earthquake; c - October 7, 1639, Amatrice
earthquake.; d - January 14, 1703, Norcia earthquake;
e - July 27, 1751, Gualdo Tadino earthquake.



686

Cristiano Collettini

Fm. (at the base of the Miocene Turbidites),
Marne a Fucoidi Fm. (a marly interval within
the carbonatic sequence), top of Triassic Evap-
orites and top of Permian-Triassic Phyllitic Ba-
sement.

The main result of the interpretation of the
seismic profiles is that the major fault of the study
area is an ENE dipping LANF, named Altotibe-
rina fault, ATF, which bounds the Tiber basin
(Barchi et al., 1998a). A portion of the CROP 03
(Pialli et al., 1998) deep seismic reflection
profiles (fig. 3), and a line drawing, derived from
a commercial profile (fig. 4) are here reproduced
along with their geological interpretations.

In the CROP 03 profile (fig. 3) the trace of
the ATF is represented by the eastward dipping
alignments of the reflectors merging at surface

into the western margin of the Tiber basin. The
alignment of the reflectors deepens towards ENE
and reaches a depth of ~ 5 s (TWT), roughly
corresponding to 13 km, below the Apenninic
belt. In the shallower part of the profile, an
antithetic normal fault bounding the eastern part
of the Tiber basin can also be detected. Along
the ATF fault trace, at depth ranging between 2.5
and 3.5 s (TWT), a lens shaped, east-dipping
package of reflectors discloses a mature fault
zone, forming an extensional duplex. On the ATF
hangingwall the seismic markers effectively
depict the previously formed compressional
structures of the Apenninic thrust and fold belt,
dissected and down-thrown by the normal fault
activity. These reflections are strongly interrupted
against the eastward dipping reflections re-
presenting the ATF and they form sharp angles.

The geometry of the continental Tiber basin
(cf. also Collettini et al., 2000) is highlighted in
the western and shallower portion of seismic
profile of fig. 4. The asymmetrical shape of the
basin is consistent with movements along an
eastward dipping normal fault: the Tiber basin
results from the activity of a high angle synthetic
splay of the ATF, whose break away zone is
located 10 km westward (fig. 2). The structures
in the ATF hanging wall show the effects of the
compressional tectonics: in particular, the
geometry of the Gubbio anticline, with the frontal
thrust and the west-dipping normal fault dis-
placing its back-limb, can be recognised.

The tectonic framework of the area is well
evidenced in the geological cross section con-
structed by integrating geological and geo-
physical data (fig. 5).

The San Donato borehole (Anelli et al., 1994)
drilled the ATF close to its breakaway zone
where it superposes the Miocene Turbidites of
the Marnoso Arenacea Fm. above the Triasssic
Evaporites. The surface expression of the ATF is
represented by the complex normal fault system
mapped at surface in the Perugia Mts. (Minelli,
1992; Brozzetti, 1995) and interpreted as a do-
mino-like structure detached on the ATF (Boncio
et al., 1998). The easternmost high-angle splay
of the ATF, which bounds the syntectonic Tiber
basin, has a maximum throw of ~ 1.5 km. The
age of the sediments infilling the Tiber basin
constrain the initiation of the activity of the

Fig.   3.  Portion of the CROP 03 deep seismic reflec-
tion profile (see location in fig. 2) and geological inter-
pretation (after Barchi et al., 1998a). a -  Normal faults;
b - thrusts; c - Marne a Fucoidi Fm.; d - top Evaporites;
e - top of Phyllitic basement.



687

Hypothesis for the mechanics and seismic behaviour of low-angle normal faults

Fig. 4. Line drawing and geological interpretation of a seismic profile (modified after Barchi et al., 1999 see
location in fig. 1). a - Normal faults; b - thrusts; c - Marne a Fucoidi Fm.; d - top Evaporites; e - top of Phyllitic
basement.

Fig.  5.  Interpretative geological cross-section through the study area, based on seismic profile of fig. 4, integrating
borehole data (Anelli et al., 1994), seismic refraction profile (Ponziani et al., 1995), surface geology data (Minelli,
1992; Brozzetti 1995).



688

Cristiano Collettini

Fig.  6a-d.  a) Earthquake locations for the study area recorded by a detailed temporary microseismic survey May-
June 1987, focal mechanisms constrained by more than eight reliable P-wave first motion polarities. Hypocentral
errors < 2 km in the XY plane and < 4 km in the Z direction (Deschamps et al., 1989; Boncio et al., 2000).
b) Summary of stress analysis for the main population of the microearthquake focal mechanisms (n = 19)
homogeneously distributed in the study area (Boncio et al., 1996, 2000). Projected on the Wulff net are: seismic
planes, observed (arrows) and theoretical (dots) slip vectors: note some gently eastward dipping planes. Orientation
of the stress tensor, possessing vertical σ1, form inversion technique (after Boncio et al., 1996, 2000). Rose
diagram constructed for the main population of the microearthquakes. c) Plot of the microseismicity on a geological
cross section obtained from a depth-converted seismic reflection profile: the events plotted possess errors in focal
depths < 1 km and are located within a band with half-width of 5.0 km. d) 3D reconstruction of the ATF constructed
by using depth converted seismic reflection profiles.

c

a b

d



689

Hypothesis for the mechanics and seismic behaviour of low-angle normal faults

easternmost splay of the ATF to the upper-
Pliocene hence suggesting a time-averaged slip
rate of 1 mm/yr. The total displacement of the
fault ranges from 5 to 8 km.

With the exception of the shallower portion,
the ATF has a gently dipping attitude (20°); the
SW-dipping normal fault which bounds the
intramountain basins are antithetic to the ATF.
The ATF cuts and displaces the compressional
structures inherited by the compressional phase.
Seismic reflection profiles constrain the geo-
metry of the ATF over an area of 150 km2: the
fault trends NNW-SSE and has a constant dip
(~ 20°) toward ENE (fig. 6d)

2.2.  Seismotectonic setting

During the last two decades, three seismic
sequences have been recorded along the Umbria
Fault System (UFS in fig. 2): Norcia 1979, Gub-
bio 1984 and Colfiorito 1997-1998 (Deschamps
et al., 1984; Haessler et al., 1988; Westaway
et al., 1989; Amato et al., 1998). Improved tech-
niques in earthquake recording and location have
led to high resolution definition of the Colfiorito
sequence but the earlier seismic sequences are
less well defined.

The three sequences are characterised by
moderate earthquakes (5.6 < M < 6.0), epi-
centres located in the proximity of the intra-
mountain basins (fig. 2) and extensional focal
mechanism with one nodal plane parallel to the
normal faults that border the extensional basins
of the area, though this interpretation has
been questioned for the Norcia event (see Cello
et al., 1997). For each sequence, the aftershock
distribution seems to highlight SW dipping
nodal planes, with the mainshocks located at the
base of the aftershock sequence at depth ranging
from 5 to 15 km. The historical seismicity of
the region (Boschi et al., 1999), with the
strongest events that reach intensity I = X, also
follows the same NNW-SSE alignment (fig. 2).
These data identify the UFS as the active system
of the area where the strongest earthquakes
occur (e.g., Barchi et al., 2000). The faults
within the UFS dip in the range 50°-70° at
surface and are antithetic to the ATF in the
seismic profiles (cf. also Boncio et al., 2000).

During May-June 1987 a seismic survey
(fig. 6a) highlighted the area between Perugia
and the Apenninic chain (Deschamps et al.,
1989). In a short time interval (2 months), nearly
400 earthquakes, with local magnitude ranging
from 0.6 to 3.0, were recorded in the study area.
The focal mechanisms (fig. 6a) show the ex-
tensional character of the microseismicity, also
confirmed by stress inversion technique (Boncio
et al., 2000) that constrains a stress tensor with
vertical σ1 and a NE trending sub-horizontal σ3
(fig. 6b). The slip orientation inferred by seis-
mological data agrees with structural data
collected in the Perugia Mts. (Brozzetti, 1995)
and with the dip of the fault obtained from
seismic reflection profiles. The distribution of
the microseismicity plotted on a geological
cross section (fig. 6c) shows the hypocenters
deepen from west to east, from about 4 km
below the Tiber basin to about 14 km below
the axial zone of the Apenninic belt. Many
events fit fairly well with the ATF trace, whereas
other earthquakes nucleate in the ATF hanging
wall; only a few scattered events are located
in the ATF footwall.

Considering the focal mechanisms available,
it can be said that most of these earthquakes have
focal mechanisms with one nodal plane oriented
in the same direction as the ATF, and some of
these planes, though without being positively
discriminated, are gently eastward dipping
(fig. 6b).

Supporting evidence for the seismogenic
role of the ATF comes from: a) the hanging wall
block has been stretching toward NE since upper
Pliocene; b) the SW dipping normal faults
antithetic to the ATF are active and seismogenic
(5.0 < M < 6.0). These faults in the seismic
profiles do not cut the ATF. Recent seismological
data recorded in Northern Umbria by a temporary
network show again that the area is characterised
by abundant microseismicity (Piccinini, personal
comunication) consistent with the ATF trace and
its seismically active hanging wall.

It is worth noting that the observed micro-
seismicity is not controlled by temperature;
models based on heat flow data for the study area
(Pauselli and Federico, 2002) locate the brittle
ductile transition between 15 and 20 km. The
distribution of the microseismicity has to be



690

Cristiano Collettini

controlled by some lithological and/or structural
factors influencing frictional properties along the
fault zone.

3.  Initiation, reactivation and frictional
lockup of normal faults

In a fluid saturated rock-mass with pore-
fluid pressure, P

f
, effective principal stresses are

1  = ( 1 – Pf ) > 2  = ( 2 – Pf ) > 3  = ( 3 – Pf )
(Hubbert and Rubey, 1959). Within intact
isotropic crust brittle faults should form in
accordance with the Coulomb criterion for shear
failure

(3.1)

where  and 
n
 are, respectively, the shear and

normal stresses on the failure plane, and C (the
cohesive strength) and µ

i
 (the coefficient of

internal friction) are rock material properties.
Experimentally determined values for internal
friction generally lie in the range 0.5 < µ

i
 < 1.0

(Jaeger and Cook, 1979), leading to the expec-
tation that brittle faults should initiate at 32° > 

i
 >

22° to the maximum compressive stress 
1
.

For a simple ‘Andersonian’ extensional re-
gime with 

v
 = 1 (Anderson, 1951), normal

faults would thus be expected to form with initial
dips in the range, 58° <  < 68°. However, with
increasing displacement individual faults may
rotate within the stress field, especially if they
occur within a parallel-dipping set which may
‘domino-rotate’ to lower dips as regional exten-
sion proceeds. Continued reactivation (reshear)
of existing cohesionless faults is then governed
by Amonton’s law

(3.2)

where µ
s
 is the coefficient of sliding friction.

From an extensive series of laboratory friction
experiments Byerlee (1978) determined that for
most rocks µs typically lies in the range 0.6-0.85.
The only prominent exceptions is for material
rich in montmorillonite, where the coefficient
may be lowered to the range, 0.2 < µ

s
 < 0.4

(Morrow et al., 1992); montmorillonite, however,
is not stable at temperatures comparable with

seismogenic depths. Constraints for friction
coefficient, µ

s
 = 0.6, also come from recent inter-

pretation of deep boreholes stress measurements
(Townend and Zoback, 2000).

For the 2D case where an existing fault
containing the 2 axis lies at a reactivation angle,

r
, to 

1
, eq. (3.2) may be rewritten in terms of

the ratio of effective principal stresses as

(3.3)

defining the relative ease of shear reactivation
for faults oriented at varying angles to 

1
 (Sib-

son, 1985). The optimal orientation for friction-
al reactivation, when the stress ratio for reactiv-
ation is a positive minimum (fig. 7a) is given by

r

*
 = 0.5 tan–1(1/µ

s
). As 

r
 decreases or increases

Fig.  7a,b.  a) Stress ratio, R, for the frictional reac-
tivation of a cohesionless fault plotted against the
reactivation angle, 

r
, for µ

s
= 0.6 (after Sibson, 1985).

b) Histogram of active normal fault dips (after
Collettini and Sibson, 2001).

µ µ= = ( )s n s n fP'

  
µ

µ
1

3

1

3

1

1

'

'
=

( )
( )

=
+P

P

f

f

s r

s r

( )cot
tan

µ µ= + = + ( )C C Pi n i n f'

a

b



691

Hypothesis for the mechanics and seismic behaviour of low-angle normal faults

away from this optimal position, the stress ratio
required for reactivation increases. Frictional
lock-up (σ

1
′/σ

3
′ = ∞) occurs when θ

r
 = 2θ

r

* = tan−1

(1/µ
s
). In the field of severe misorientation,

beyond frictional lock-up, reshear is only
possible under the tensile overpressure condition
(Sibson, 1990) with σ

3
′ = (σ

3
 – P

f
) < 0.

For Byerlee’s (1978) range for rock friction,
optimal reactivation occurs when θ

r
 = 25-30°

(with faults close to their original ‘Andersonian’
initiation attitudes) and frictional lock-up is
expected at θ

r
 = 50-59°.

The Anderson-Byerlee frictional fault mecha-
nics (vertical σ1; µs = 0.6) agrees with the dip range
of active normal faults capable of generating big
ruptures (fig. 7b): compilation of dip estimates pre-
pared from focal mechanisms of shallow intra-
continental normal-slip earthquakes (M > 5.5;
slip vector raking 90 ± 30° in the fault plane)
where the rupture plane is unambiguously discri-
minated extends from 65° > δ > 30° (Collettini
and Sibson, 2001). Due to the impossibility of
sustaining P

f
 > σ3 no big ruptures occur on normal

faults dipping less than 30°.

4.  The debate on low-angle normal faults

The presence of low-angle normal faults,
LANFs, (dip < 30°) has been extensively docu-
mented in areas of continental extension. LANFs
were first recognised in the Basin and Range
province (Wernicke, 1981; Lister and Davis,
1989 for a comprehensive review) and then
documented in other areas: in Greece (Lister et al.,
1984; Rigo et al., 1996; Sorel, 2000); in the East
African Ridge System (Morley, 1999) in the
Northern Apennines (Carmignani and Kling-
field, 1990; Jolivet et al., 1998; Pialli et al.,
1998). Though the LANFs topics is well covered
in literature, it is still full of controversies.

First, how do LANFs form (i.e. is their low-
angle attitude an original feature or the result
of rotation)? According to Anderson-Byerlee
frictional fault mechanics, normal faults initiate
at dips ~ 60° than domino rotate to frictional
lockup angles, 40°-30° (Sibson, 1985). Dips
lower than lockup angle would be achieved by
domino rotation produced by successive normal
fault sets (Proffett, 1977), or isostatic adjustments

producing footwall flexure and uplift (Wernicke
and Axen, 1988). In marked contrasts some field
observations constrain initiation and movements
along LANFs at dips similar to their present attitude
(Scott and Lister, 1992; John and Foster, 1993).
Very low dips have been also explained as the result
of dramatic departures from the Andersonian state
of stress induced by severe topography (Abers
et al., 1997) or high shear stress at the base of the
brittle crust (Westaway, 1999).

Second, can displacement be accommodated
by LANFs and how (seismic, microseismic,
aseismic)? There are no definitive examples of
M > 5.5 normal slip earthquakes on fault dipping
less than 30° (fig. 7b). On the contrary three
possibly low-angle ruptures (10°< δ < 30°; 6.0 <
<M

w
< 6.8), though without positive discrim-

ination, have been adduced to a LANF active in
the Papua New Guinea (PNG) region (Abers,
1991; Wernicke, 1995): the lack in the con-
temporary seismic record of moderate and large
ruptures on LANFs has been suggested to be due
to their long recurrence intervals (Wernicke,
1995). In considering the PNG earthquakes as
genuine ruptures on LANFs two points must be
considered. Firstly, it can be said that depth
converted seismic profiles crossing the same area
show the seismogenic low angle detachment
dipping ~ 30° (Taylor et al., 1999). Secondly, it
should be noted that in some peculiar conditions
(i.e. areas of high extensional rates) shear stress
at the base of the brittle layer can be high enough
to perturb the stress field in the upper crust with
the consequent rotation of the σ1 trajectories
(Westaway, 1999); in this case a LANF is not
severely misoriented for reactivation and can
nucleate moderate earthquakes.

More recently, there have been suggestions of
a microseismically active low-angle detachment
dipping ca. 15° north beneath the rapidly exten-
ding Gulf of Corinth, Greece (Rietbrock et al.,
1996; Rigo et al., 1996), though this interpretation
has since been questioned (Hatzfeld et al., 2000).

5.  Mechanical consideration on ATF

In order to discuss the mechanical conditions
to explain the microseismic activity of the ATF
(dip 20°) within a regional stress field charac-



692

Cristiano Collettini

terised by a vertical σ1 (e.g., Boncio et al., 1996;
Chiaraluce et al., 2001), frictional fault mecha-
nics has been applied.

Since most of the earthquakes are due to local
frictional instability on existing faults (Scholz,
1998) and since the ATF shows a normal slip
kinematics, 2D reactivation theory has been
applied.

The analysis seeks to speculate on the con-
ditions for reactivation of the ATF, using Mohr
circles in a Coulomb Griffith failure diagram
integrated with the re-shear condition (e.g.,
Brace, 1960; Hancock, 1985). Under vertical
trajectories of σ1 it is analysed with Mohr circles
the state of stress necessary for reactivation of
the plane of weakness as a function of differential
stress (σ

1
– σ

3
), reactivation angle (θ

r
) and fluid

pressure (P
f
).

To do this, in the parametric equations of a
circle

(5.1)

(5.2)

it is written

   r = 1/2 (σ1 − σ3 )
and

          a = σ
3
′ + 1/2 (σ1 − σ3 ).

From eq. (3.3), the values of differential stress,
(σ1–σ3), and effective least principal stress, σ3′,
have been written (Sibson, 2000) as

(5.3)

(5.4)

By the eqs. (5.1)-(5.3) and (5.4), is possible to
evaluate with Mohr circles the conditions for
reactivation of the ATF as a function of the
reactivation angle θ

r
, depth and fluid pressure.

 For the intact rock failure envelope in the
compressional field µ

i
 = 0.75 has been assumed,

corresponding to the mid value for the internal

friction coefficient (0.5 < µ
i
 < 1.0) ( Jaeger and

Cook, 1979). For the re-shear condition the
friction coefficient µ

s
 = 0.6 has been assumed,

the lower end-member of the Byerlee (1978)
range.

The average density of the crust ρ is assumed
to be 2650 kg/m3 and g is the gravitational ac-
celeration. The pore fluid factor λ

v
 represents

the ratio between fluid pressure P
f
 and the

lithostatic stress (σ
v
 = ρgz) assumed to coincide

with σ1. Hydrostatic fluid pressure is repre-
sented by λ

v
 = 0.4 while lithostatic by λ

v
 = 1.0.

Figure 8a-c represents the computed Mohr
circles for a fault dipping 20°, corresponding to
θ

r
 = 70°, for different values of the pore fluid

factor, at 10 km of depth and for a tensile
strength of the rocks enclosing the fault T ~ 10
MPa.

Under these boundary conditions, the reac-
tivation of the ATF is met only for low values of
differential stress (σ

1
− σ

3
 < 28 MPa) and quasi

lithostatic fluid pressures (λ
v
 > 0.93), circle 1 not

intercepting neither the Griffith parabola nor the
Coulomb criteria.

For lower values of the pore fluid factor
(λ

v
 < 0.93) the differential stress is higher (eq.

(5.3)) and σ
3
′ is negative for θ

r
 = 70° (eq. (5.4));

under these conditions the ATF cannot be
reactivated. In fact, the situations represented by
circles 2 and 3 cannot be reached. Figure 8b
represents the fault loading, assumed to be
induced mainly by the increase in fluid pressure,
for a differential stress equal to the diameter
of circle 2. Before reaching the condition for
reactivation of the ATF (circle 2, fig. 8b), exten-
sional fractures or extensional-shear fractures
occur as soon as the Mohr circle intercepts
the Griffith parabola (e.g., point E on fig. 8b).
This occurs for all values 0.86 < λ

v
 < 0.93.

For greater values of differential stress (circle 3),
a new ‘Andersonian’ fault develops as soon as
the Mohr circle intercepts the Coulomb criterion
(point C on fig. 8c), and this happens for all
values λ

v
 < 0.86.

It has been tested the sensitivity of the calcu-
lations to the assumed friction coefficients, within
the «Byerlee law», and to different depths: under
the conditions required for reactivation of the
ATF, the simulations are modestly sensitive to
these parameters.

x a r= − cos2α

y r= ° sin                  0 < < 90     2α α

σ σ
µ θ θ

µ θ
ρ λ1 3

1
1−( ) =

+( )
+( )

−( )
s r r

s r

vgz
tan cot

cot

σ
µ θ
µ θ

ρ λ3
1
1

1' .=
−
+

−( )s r
s r

vgh
tan
cot

 



693

Hypothesis for the mechanics and seismic behaviour of low-angle normal faults

The mechanical analysis says that the ATF
can be reactivated only in peculiar circumstances:
low differential stress, T ~ 10 MPa and high fluid
pressure in particular. In the next two paragraphs

the specialised circumstances that in the study
area may lead to localised fluid overpressures
will be discussed.

5.1.  Local short lived attainment of tensile
        fluid overpressure a possible explanation
        for small ruptures

As discussed previously, the key issue for
reactivation of the ATF is the attainment of
the tensile overpressure condition P

f
 > σ

3
 (i.e.

λ
v
 > 0.93).

As a consequence of slip, which produces
grain comminution, porosity collapse and al-
teration of clay-rich material from the Phyllitic
basement, the ATF represents an impermeable
horizon trapping fluids coming from deeper
levels favouring fluid overpressures. Moreover,
the Phyllitic fault gouge itself can generate water
from dehydration reactions (Faulkner and Rutter,
2001).

It is unlikely, however, to sustain tensile fluid
overpressure, P

f
 > σ3, for wide fault portions.

First, fluid loss through hydraulic extension
fracturing limit the sustainability of the tensile
overpressure condition required for reactivation.
Second, an increase in permeability under low
effective stress has been documented by labo-
ratory experiments (Seront et al., 1998). Third,
the load-weakening behaviour for normal
faulting induced by the preseismic decrease of
the mean stress favours the increase in permea-
bility (Sibson, 1993).

These considerations suggest that the over-
pressure condition is likely to develop only in
small portions of the ATF (fig. 9) and for a short
time, being a possible explanation for the micro-
seismic activity (1 < M < 3) recorded along the
fault and involving rupture surfaces in the order
of 10–1 – 10–3 km2 (Sibson, 1989). The impos-
sibility of sustaining the tensile overpressure
condition over wide fault portions would prevent
the nucleation of big ruptures (M > 5.5; rupture
dimensions ca. 5 km) on normal faults dipping
less than 30° (cf. fig. 7a,b).

Dealing with the influence of fluid pressure
in rupture nucleation and propagation, Miller
et al. (1996) proposed a model coupling shear
stress and high fluid pressure; the increase in fluid

Fig.  8a-c.  a) Differential stress (σ1 – σ3), required for
reactivation of the ATF, θ

r
 = 70°, under a pore fluid

factor λ
v
 = 0.94, 0.90, 0.86, tensile strength of the rock

T = 10 MPa, plotted in a composite Coulomb-Griffith
diagram integrated with the re-shear condition of shear
stress, τ, against normal stress σ

n
. Only circle 1

represents the conditions for reactivation of the ATF.
b,c) Fault loading mainly induced by the increase of
fluid pressure starting from differential stress values
represented by circles 2 and 3. b) The Mohr circle
intercepts the Griffith parabola at point E, leading to
the formation of extensional fractures before reaching
the condition for reactivation of ATF (circle 2). c) The
Mohr circle intercepts the Coulomb criterion at point
C, leading to the formation of a new ‘Andersonian’
fault before reaching the condition for reactivation of
ATF (circle 3).

c

a

b



694

Cristiano Collettini

pressure within discrete cells creates zones of low
effective stress which produce slip. The pro-
pagation of ruptures toward the other cells and thus
the possibility to create earthquakes of different
magnitudes, is a function of the state of stress
of the surrounding areas. Pressurised (P

f
 > σ3 )

small portions of the ATF, characterised by very
low effective stress, can slip. When the slip takes
place, it is unlikely to propagate in the sur-
rounding regions because of: 1) strain hardening
and velocity hardening of the phyllitic gouge
(Faulkner and Rutter, 2001); 2) reduced rupture
propagation rates on low angle normal faults
(Ofoegbu and Ferrill, 1998).

5.2.  Why is there fluid overpressure in an
        extending crust?

Although fluid overpressures in extensional
environments are not the rule, the study area
represents a peculiar case. High flow rates of gas
emission have been documented in the western
sector of the Tiber basin with isotopic signatures
suggesting deep source (Vasselli et al., 1997;
Minissale et al., 2000). This non-volcanic man-
tle derived CO

2
 flux is widespread in Central

Italy (see also fig. 1) and extremely vigorous
(1-3 ⋅ 1011mol ⋅ yr–1) with maximum fluxes in the
order of 0.2 m3⋅m2⋅yr–1 (Chiodini et al., 2000).
The CO

2
 rich fluids on their ascent are likely to

be entrapped when encounter stratigraphical
(e.g., Evaporites or Phyllitic basement) or

structural seal (e.g., ATF). At the beginning, CO2
tends to be dissolved in the pore water present at
the base of the seal (fig. 10a). The increase in CO

2

concentration leads to the formation of a free gas
phase (Chiodini et al., 1999) as soon as the total
pressure of the reservoir (roughly corresponding
to pCO

2
) exceeds pore fluid pressure at the base

of the seal. This process produces gas bubbles
(fig. 10b) that add to pore pressure and favour the
attainment of the tensile overpressure conditions
required for reactivation. The consequent slip on
the fault creates permeability with post seismic
fluid and gas discharge. This process accounts
both for the presence in the western margin of the
Tiber basin of focussed vents and for the high
pressure gas pockets documented in the deep
drilling of the region (Chiodini et al., 1999). It is
worth noting that the San Donato borehole, before
being stopped for fluid overpressure, encountered
pCO2 of about 100 MPa at 4.7 km depth (Chiodini
and Cioni, 1989) corresponding to a pore fluid
factor at least λ

v
 = 0.85.

Other examples of high fluid pressures in
extensional environments have been documented
by fluid inclusion studies in correspondence with

Fig.  9.  Cartoon showing the rupture dimensions for
a M = 1, M = 3, M = 5.5 earthquake. The tensile fluid
overpressure condition is sustained only along small
fault portions capable of generating microseismicity.

Fig. 10a,b. Schematic model for the attainment of
tensile fluid overpressure. a) Deep emissions of CO2
rich fluids encounter a fluid rich reservoir below a
structural seal (e.g., ATF). At the beginning CO2 tends
to be dissolved within the fluid. b) Increasing con-
centration of CO

2
 leads to gas bubble formation within

the reservoir favouring the attainment of the tensile
fluid overpressure P

f
 > σ

3
.

a b

����

����

���

���	�

��




695

Hypothesis for the mechanics and seismic behaviour of low-angle normal faults

exhumed seismogenic normal faults in Nevada
and Utah (Parry and Bruhn, 1990), and a pore
fluid factor of 0.95 has been measured from well
data in extending crusts beneath shale sequences
in the Gulf Coast Basin (Bradshaw and Zoback,
1988).

6.  Discussion

In the study area, the strongest seismicity,
represented by moderate extensional earthquakes
(5.0 < M < 6.0), is related to a set of SW dipping
normal faults which border the Quaternary intra-
mountain basins of the area. These faults dipping
at the surface in the range of 50°-70° are anti-
thetic to an ENE-dipping LANF (ATF), whose
geometry has been reconstructed matching
surface geology with boreholes data and seismic
reflection profiles. The fault has an average dip
of 20° and shows a good correlation with the
microseismicity of the area. The application of
reactivation theory (Sibson, 1985, 1990) under
vertical trajectories of  σ1, suggests that the ATF
can be seismically reactivated only in specialised
circumstances, characterised by tensile fluid
overpressure, P

f
 > σ

3
, (i.e. λ

v
 < 0.93). This con-

dition is difficult to maintain and it is likely to
be sustained only for a small fault portion which
can produce microearthquakes.

Friction coefficient too may influence the dip
range of severely misoriented faults. If for some
reason (not well documented by laboratory or
borehole data, but see Townend and Zoback,
2001) the fault possesses very low friction
coefficient at seismogenic depths (e.g., µ

s
 ~ 0.35

at depth > 5 km), a 20° dipping normal fault is
not in the field of severe misoriented fault hence
in a condition to be reactivated without invoking
the tensile fluid overpressure condition (P

f
 > σ

3
).

In the peculiar situation of the Northern
Apennines, large emissions of fluids, probably
related to mantle degassing phenomena (Chiodini
et al., 2000), are likely to be the major cause for
the weakening mechanism of the ATF. When
these fluids in their ascent meet the ATF, they
can be entrapped in small fault portions. The
continuous CO

2
 flux forms gas bubbles that add

to pore pressure and favours the attainment of
localised overpressures which lead to the nu-

cleation of small earthquakes. In any case, the
microseismicity recorded along the ATF cannot
account for the displacement of the fault (2 km
for the easternmost splay of the ATF in the upper
Pliocene-Quaternary, i.e. ~ 1 mm/yr) part of
which is presumably accommodated aseis-
mically. According to these considerations, the
ATF would represent a creeping LANF, with
most of its trace within the Phyllitic basement,
producing part of its displacement aseismically
and in some peculiar circumstances, nucleating
microearthquakes as a consequence of local fluid
overpressures.

This seismic behaviour is in agreement with
the mode of failure for a phyllosilicate-rich gouge
found from laboratory experiments (Faulkner and
Rutter, 2001). Rubin et al., (1999) also docu-
mented that faults which creep largely aseis-
mically, simultaneously produce abundant
microearthquakes, and the total slip represented
by the earthquakes amounts to only a small
fraction of the long term observed slip rate.

Acknowledgements

I thank Massimiliano Barchi and Rick Sibson
for discussions, Carlo Cardellini and Giovanni
Chiodini for help on the CO2 topic. This research
was supported by MIUR 01 UR Perugia, Massi-
miliano Barchi grant.

REFERENCES

ABERS, G.A. (1991): Possible seismogenic shallow-dipping
normal faults in the Woodlark-D’Entrecasteaux
extensional province, Papua New Guinea, Geology, 1,
1205-1208.

ABERS, G.A., C.Z. MUTTER and G. FANG (1997): Shallow
dips of normal faults during rapid extension: Earthquakes
in the Woodlark-D’Entrecasteaux rift system, Papua New
Guinea, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 15301-15317.

ALVAREZ, W. (1972): Rotation of the Corsica-Sardinia
microplate, Nature, 248, 309-314.

AMATO, A., R. AZZARA, C. CHIARABBA, G. B. CIMINI, M.
COCCO, M. DI BONA, L. MARGHERITI, S. MAZZA, F.
ME L E, G. SE LVA G G I, A. BA S I L I, E. BO S C H I, F.
CO U R B O U L E X, A. DE S C H A M P S, S. GA F F E T , G.
BITTARELLI, L. CHIARALUCE, D. PICCININI and M.
RIPEPE (1998): The 1997 Umbria-Marche, Italy,
earthquake sequence: a first look at the main shocks and
aftershocks, Geophys. Res. Lett., 25, 2861-2864.



696

Cristiano Collettini

AMBROSETTI, P., M.G. CARBONI, M.A. CONTI, A. CO-
STANTINI, D. ESU, A. GADIN, O. GIROTTI, A. LAZ-
ZAROTTI, R. MAZZANTI, U. NICOSIA, G. PARISI and F.
SANDRELLI (1978): Evoluzione paleogeografica e
tettonica dei bacini tosco-umbro-laziali nel Pliocene e
nel Pleistocene inferiore, Mem. Soc. Geol. Ital., 19,
573-580.

ANDERSON, E.M. (1951): The Dynamics of Faulting
(Edinburgh, Oliver and Boyd), 2nd ed., pp. 206.

ANELLI, L., M. GORZA, M. PIERI and M. RIVA (1994):
Subsurface well data in the Northern Apennines (Italy),
Mem. Soc. Geol. Ital., 48, 461-471.

BALLY, A.W., L. BURBI, C. COOPER and L. CHELARDONI
(1986): Balanced sections and seismic reflection profiles
across the Central Apennines, Mem. Soc. Geol. Ital., 35,
257-310.

BARCHI, R.M., G. MINELLI and G. PIALLI (1998a): The
CROP 03 profile: a synthesis of results on deep structures
of the Northern Apennines, Mem. Soc. Geol. Ital., 52,
383-400.

BARCHI, M.R., A. DE FEYTER, M.B. MAGNANI, G. MINELLI,
G. PIALLI and M. SOTERA (1998b): Extesional tectonics
in the Northern Apennines (Italy): evidence from the
Crop 03 deep seismic reflection line, Mem. Soc. Geol.
Ital., 52, 527-538.

BARCHI, M.R., S. PAOLACCI, C. PAUSELLI, G. PIALLI and S.
MERLINI (1999): Geometria delle deformazioni
estensionali recenti nel bacino dell’Alta Val Tiberina fra
S. Giustino Umbro e Perugia: evidenze geofisiche e
considerazioni geologiche, Boll. Soc. Geol. Ital., 118,
617-625.

BARCHI, M.R., F. GALADINI, G. LAVECCHIA, P. MESSINA,
A.M. MICHETTI, L. PERUZZA, A. PIZZI, E. TONDI and E.
VITTORI (2000): Sintesi sulle Conoscenze delle Faglie
Attive in Italia Centrale, Gruppo Nazionale per la Difesa
dei Terremoti, pp. 62

BONCIO, P., F. BROZZETTI and G. LAVECCHIA (1996): State
of stress in the Northern Umbria-Marche Apennines
(Central Italy): inferences from microearthquake and
fault kinematics analyses, Ann. Tectonicae, 10, 80-97.

BONCIO, P., F. BROZZETTI, F. PONZIANI, M.R. BARCHI, G.
LAVECCHIA and G. PIALLI (1998): Seismicity and
extensional tectonics in the Northern Umbria-Marche
Apennines, Mem. Soc. Geol. Ital., 52, 539-555.

BONCIO, P., F. BROZZETTI and G. LAVECCHIA (2000):
Architecture and seismotectonics of a regional low-
angle normal fault zone in Central Italy, Tectonics, 19,
1038-1055.

BOSCHI, E., E. GUIDOBONI, G. FERRARI, D. MARIOTTI, G.
VALENSISE and P. GASPERINI (2000): Catalogue of strong
Italian earthquakes from 461 B.C. to 1997, Ann. Geofis.,
43 (4), pp. 268, with full database on CD-ROM (http://
www.ingv.it/).

BRACE, W.F. (1980): Permeability of Crystalline and
Argillaceous rocks, Int. J. Rock. Mech. Min. Sci. Geoch.
Abst., 17, 241-251.

BRADSHAW, G.A. and M.D. ZOBACK (1988): Listric normal
faulting, stress refraction, and the state of stress in the
Gulf Coast basin, Geology, 16, 271-274.

BROZZETTI, F. (1995): Stile deformativo della tettonica
distensiva nell’Umbria Occidentale: l’esempio dei

Massicci Mesozoici Perugini, Studi Geologici Camerti,
1, 105-119.

BYERLEE, J. (1978): Friction of Rocks, Pageoph., 116,
        615-626.
CARMIGNANI, L. and R. KLINGFIELD (1990): Crustal

extension in the Northern Apennines: the transition from
compression to extension in the Alpi Apuane core
complex, Tectonics, 9, 1275-1303.

CELLO, G., S. MAZZOLI, E. TONDI and E. TURCO (1997):
Active tectonics in the Central Apennines and possible
implications for seismic hazard analysis in Peninsular
Italy, Tectonophysics, 272, 43-68.

CHIARALUCE, L., W.L. ELLSWORTH, C. CHIARABBA and M.
COCCO (2001): Imaging fault geometries with high-
resolution seismicity data in a complex normal faulting
setting in the Central Apennines, Italy, Fall Meeting, San
Francisco 10-14 December 2001, Am. Geophys. Un.

CHIODINI, G. and R. CIONI (1989): Gas geobarometry for
hydrothermal systems and its application to various
Italian geothermal areas, Appl. Geochem., 4, 564-572.

CHIODINI, G., F. FRONDINI and F. PONZIANI (1995): Deep
structures and carbon dioxide degassing in Central Italy,
Geothermics, 1, 81-94.

CHIODINI, G., F. FRONDINI, D.M. KERRICK, J. ROGIE, F.
PARELLO, L. PERUZZI and A.R. ZANZARI (1999):
Quantification of deep CO

2
 fluxes from Central Italy.

Examples of carbon balance for regional aquifers and
soil diffuse degassing, Chem. Geol., 159, 205-222.

CHIODINI, G., F. FRONDINI, C. CARDELLINI, F. PARELLO and
L. PERUZZI (2000): Rate of diffuse carbon dioxide Earth
degassing estimated from carbon bilance of regional
aquifers: the case of Central Apennine, Italy,  J. Geophys.
Res., 105, 8423-8434.

COLLETTINI, C. (2001): Architecture, geometry and
mechanics of seismogenic normal faults in the Northern
Apennines, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Perugia, pp. 199.

COLLETTINI, C. and R.H. SIBSON (2001): Normal faults
normal friction?, Geology, 29, 927-930.

COLLETTINI, C., M.R. BARCHI, C. PAUSELLI, C. FEDERICO
and G. PIALLI (2000): Seismic expression of active
extensional faults in Northern Umbria (Central Italy),
in The Resolution of Geological Analysis and Models
for Earthquake Faulting Studies, edited by G. CELLO
and E. TONDI, J. Geodyn., 29, 309-321.

DESCHAMPS, A., G. IIANNACCONE and R. SCARPA (1984):
The Umbrian earthquake (Italy) of 19 September 1979,
Ann. Geophysicae, 2 (1), 29-36.

DESCHAMPS, A., R. SCARPA and G. SELVAGGI (1989): Analisi
sismologica del settore settentrionale dell’Appennino
umbro-marchigiano, GNGTS 8th Conference, 1, 9-15.

DOGLIONI, C. (1991): A proposal of kinematic modelling for
W-dipping subductions. Possible applications in the
Tyrrhenian-Apennines system, Terra Nova, 3, 423-434.

ELTER, P., G. GIGLIA, M. TONGIORGI and L. TREVISAN
(1975): Tensional and compressional areas in the recent
(Tortonian to Present) evolution of the Northern
Apennines, Boll. Geofis. Teor. Appl., 17, 3-18.

FAULKNER, D.R. and E.H. RUTTER (2001): Can the
maintenance of overpressured fluids in large strike-slip
fault zones explain their apparent weakness?, Geology,
29, 503-506.



697

Hypothesis for the mechanics and seismic behaviour of low-angle normal faults

HAESSLER, H., R. GAULON, L. RIVERA, R. CONSOLE, M.
FRONGNEUX, G. GASPARINI, L. MARTEL, G. PATAU, M.
SICILIANO and A. CISTERNAS (1988): The Perugia (Italy)
earthquake of 29, April 1984: a microearthquake survey,
Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 78, 1948-1964.

HANCOCK, P.L. (1985): Brittle microtectonics: principles and
practise, J. Struct. Geol., 7, 437-457.

HATZFELD, D., V. KARAKOSTAS, M. ZIAZIA, I. KASSARAS,
E. PAPADIMITRIOU, K. MAKROPOULOS, N. VOULGARIS
and C. PAPAIOANNOU (2000): Microseismicity and
faulting geometry in the Gulf of Corinth (Greece),
Geophys. J. Int., 141, 438-456.

HUBBERT, M.K. and W.W. RUBEY (1959): Role of fluid
pressure in mechanics of overthrust faulting, Geol. Soc.
Am. Bull., 70, 115-160.

JAEGER, J.C. and N.G. W.COOK (1979): Fundamentals of
Rock Mechanics (Methuen, London), 3rd ed., pp. 593.

JOHN, B.E. and D.A. FOSTER (1993): Structural and thermal
constraints on the initiation angle of detachment faulting
in the southern basin and range: the Chemehuevi
Mountains study, Geol. Soc. Am. Bull., 105, 1091-1108.

JOLIVET, L., C. FACCENNA, B. GOFFÉ, M. MATTEI, F.
ROSSETTI, C. BRUNET, F. STORTI, R. FUNICIELLO, J.P.
CA D E T, N. D’AG O S T I N O and T. PA R R A (1998):
Midcrustal shear zones in postorogenic extension:
example from the Northern Tyrrhenian Sea,  J. Geophys.
Res., 103, 12123-12160.

KELLER, J.V.A., G. MINELLI and G. PIALLI (1994): Anatomy
of late orogenic extension: the Northern Apennines case,
Tectonophysics, 238, 275-294.

LAVECCHIA, G., F. BROZZETTI, M.R. BARCHI, J. KELLER and
M. MENICHETTI (1994): Seismotectonic zoning in East-
Central Italy deduced from the analysis of the Neogene
to present deformations and related stress fields, Bull.
Geol. Soc. Am., 106, 1107-1120.

LISTER, G.S. and G.A. DAVIS (1989): The origin of
metamorphic core complexes and detachment faults
formed during Tertiary continental extension in the
Northern Colorado River region, U.S.A.,  J. Struct. Geol.,
11, 65-93.

LISTER, G.S., G. BANGA and A. FEENSTRA (1984): Meta-
morphic core complexes of Cordilleran type in the
Cyclades, Aegean Sea, Greece, Geology, 12, 221-225.

MARIUCCI, M.T., A. AMATO and P. MONTONE (1999): Recent
tectonic evolution and present stress in the Northern
Apennines, Tectonics, 18, 108-118.

MARSON, I., L. CERNOBORI, R. NICOLICH, M. STOKA, D.
LIOTTA, F. PALMIERI and I. VELICOGNA (1998): CROP03
profile: a geophysical analysis of data and results, Mem.
Soc. Geol. Ital., 52, 123-137.

MI L L E R, S.A., A. NU R and D.L. OL G A A R D (1996):
Earthquakes as coupled shear stress-high pore pressure
dynamical system, Geophys. Res. Lett., 23, 197-200.

MINELLI, G. (1992): Tectonic Evolution of the Perugia Massif
Area, Northern Apennines (Italy), Unpubl. Ph. D. Thesis,
Imperial College, London, pp. 158.

MINISSALE, A., G. MAGRO, G. MARTINELLI, O. VASELLI and
G.F. TASSI (2000): Fluid geochemical transect in the
Northern Apennines, (Central-Northern Italy): fluid
genesis and migration and tectonic implications,
Tectonophysics, 319, 199-222.

MONGELLI, F. and G. ZITO (1991): Flusso di calore nella
regione Toscana, Studi Geologici Camerti, special issue
1991/1, 91-98.

MORLEY, C.K. (1999): Marked along-strike variations in
dip of normal faults-the Lokichar fault, N. Kenya rift:
a possible cause for metamorphic core complexes,

       J. Struct. Geol., 21, 479-492.
MORROW, C., B. RADLEY and J.D. BYERLEE (1992):

Frictional strength and the effective pressure law for
montmorillonite and illite clays, in Fault Mechanics and
Transport Properties of Rock, edited by B. EVANS and
T.F WONG (Academic Press, London), 69-88.

OFOEGBU, G.I. and D.A. FERRILL (1998): Mechanical
analyses of listric normal faulting with emphasis on
seismicity assessment, Tectonophysics, 284, 65-77.

PARRY, W.T. and R.L. BRUHN (1990): Fluid pressure
transients on seismogenic normal faults, Tectonophysics,
179, 335-344.

PASCUCCI, V., S. MERLINI and I.P. MARTINI (1999): Seismic
stratigraphy in the Miocene-Pleistocene sedimentary
basins of the Northern Tyrrhenian Sea and Western
Tuscany (Italy), Basin Res., 11, 337-356.

PAUSELLI, C. and C. FEDERICO (2002): The brittle/ductile
transition along the CROP 03 seismic profile: rela-
tionships with the geological features, in Atti del
Convegno «Evoluzione Geologica e Geodinamica
dell’Appennino», in memoria di Giampaolo Pialli, Boll.
Soc. Geol. Ital., 1, 25-35.

PIALLI, G., M.R. BARCHI and G. MINELLI (1998): Results of
the CROP 03 deep seismic reflection profile, Mem. Soc.
Geol. Ital., 52, pp. 657.

PONZIANI, F., R. DE FRANCO, G. MINELLI, G. BIELLA, C.
FEDERICO and G. PIALLI (1995): Crustal shortening and
duplication of the Moho in the Northern Apennines: a
view from seismic refraction data, Tectonophysics, 252,
391-418.

PROFFETT, J.M. (1977): Cenozoic geology of the Yerington
district, Nevada, and implications for the nature of basin
and range faulting, Geol. Soc. Am. Bull., 88, 247-266.

REUTTER, K.J., P. GIESE and H. CLOSS (1980): Lithospheric
split in the descending plate: observations from the
Northern Apennines, Tectonophysics, 64, T1-T9.

RIETBROCK, A., C. TIBERI, F. SCHERBAUM and H. LYON-
CAEN (1996): Seismic slip on a low-angle normal fault
in the Gulf of Corinth: evidence from high-resolution
cluster analysis of microearthquakes, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 23, 1817-1820.

RIGO, A., H. LYON-CAEN, R. ARMIJO, A. DESCHAMPS, D.
HATZFELD, K. MAKROPOULOS, P. PAPADIMITRIOU and
I. KASSARAS (1996):  A microseismic study in the
western part of the Gulf of Corinth (Greece): implications
for large-scale normal faulting mechanisms, Geophys.
J. Int., 126, 663-688.

ROYDEN, L. and G.D. KARNER (1984): Flexure of the
litosphere beneath Apennine and the Carpathian foredeep
basins: evidence for an insufficient topographic load,
Am. Assoc. Petr. Geol. Bul., 68, 704-712.

RUBIN, A.M., D. GILLARD and J.L. GOT (1999): Streaks of mi-
croseismicity along creeping faults, Nature, 400, 635-641.

SCHOLZ, C.H. (1998): Earthquakes and friction laws, Nature,
391, 37-42.



698

Cristiano Collettini

SCOTT, R.J. and G.D. LISTER (1992): Detachment faults:
evidence for a low-angle origin, Geology, 20, 833-836.

SERONT, B., T-F. WONG, J.S. CAINE, C.B. FORSTER, R.L.
BR U H N and J.T. FR E D R I C H (1998): Laboratory
characterisations of hydromechanical properties of a
seismogenic normal fault system, J. Struct. Geol., 20,
865-882.

SIBSON, R.H. (1985): A note on fault reactivation, J. Struct.
Geol., 7, 751-754.

SIBSON, R.H. (1989): Earthquake faulting as a structural
process, J. Struct. Geol., 11, 1-14.

SIBSON, R.H. (1990): Rupture nucleation on unfavourably
oriented faults, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 80, 1580-1604.

SIBSON, R.H. (1993): Load-strengthening versus load-
weakening faulting, J. Struct. Geol., 15, 123-128.

SIBSON, R.H.  (2000): Fluid involvement in normal faulting,
in The Resolution of Geological Analysis and Models
for Earthquake Faulting Studies, edited by G. CELLO
and E. TONDI, J. Geodyn., 29, 469-499.

SOREL, D. (2000): A Pleistocene and still-active detachment
fault and the origin of the Corinth-Patras rift, Greece,
Geology, 28, 83-86.

SUHADOLC, P. and G.F. PANZA (1989): Physical properties
of the lithosphere-astenosphere system in Europe from
geophysical data, in The Lithosphere in Italy, edited by
A. BORIANI, M. BONAFEDE, G.B. PICCARDO and G.B.
VAI, Accad. Naz. Lincei, Roma, Adv. Earth. Sci. Res.,
80, 15-40.

TAYLOR, B., A.M. GOODLIFFE and F. MARTINEZ (1999): How
continents break up: insights from Papua New Guinea,

J. Geophys. Res., 104, 7497-7512.
TOWNEND, J. and M.D. ZOBACK (2000): How faulting keeps

the crust strong, Geology, 28, 399-402.
TOWNEND, J. and M.D. ZOBACK (2001): Implications of

earthquake focal mechanisms for the frictional strength
of the San Andreas fault system, Geol. Soc. London,
Spec. Pub., 186, 13-21.

VASELLI, O., F. TASSI, A. MINISSALE, B. CAPACCIONI, G.
MAGRO and W.C. EVANS (1997): Geochemistry of
natural gas manifestations from the upper Tiber Valley
(Central Italy), Miner. Petrog. Acta, 40, 201-212.

WERNICKE, B.P. (1981): Low-angle normal faults in the Basin
and Range Province: nappe tectonics in an extending
orogene, Nature, 291, 645-648.

WERNICKE, B. (1995): Low-angle normal faults and
seismicity: a review, J. Geophys. Res., 100, 20,159-
20,174.

WERNICKE, B. and G.J. AXEN (1988): On the role of isostasy
in the evolution of normal fault systems, Geology, 16,
848-851.

WESTAWAY, R. (1999): The mechanical feasibility of low-
angle normal faulting, Tectonophysics, 308, 407-443.

WESTAWAY, R., R. GAWTHORPE and M. TOZZI (1989):
Seismological and field observations of the 1984 Lazio-
Abruzzo earthquakes: implications for the active
tectonics of Italy, Geophys. J. Int., 98, 489-514.

(received June 18, 2002;
accepted October 21, 2002)