SCANDONE_final_Layout 6 ANNALS OF GEOPHYSICS, 56, 4, 2013, S0455; doi:10.4401/ag-6461 S0455 Volcanic precursors in light of eruption mechanisms at Vesuvius Roberto Scandone*, Lisetta Giacomelli Università di Roma Tre, Dipartimento di Matematica e Fisica, Rome, Italy ABSTRACT Vesuvius entered a quiescent stage after the eruption of March-April 1944. The eruption was not much different or larger than other before, like for example the one of 1906, but it occurred at the end of a long period dur- ing which it was observed a decreasing trend of explosivity of eruptions [Scandone et al. 2008]. The parallel increase in the frequency of slow ef- fusive eruptions, with respect to violent strombolian eruptions, point out to a process of average slower rate of magma ascent possibly due to a pro- gressive sealing of the ascent path of magma to the surface. The small caldera collapse following the 1944 explosive phase effectively sealed the upper conduit, and since then the volcano entered a quiescence stage that was unusual with respect to the pattern of activity of the previous 300 years when the maximum repose time had been of 7 years (after the erup- tion of 1906). Most of the uncertainty on the duration of the present stage and character of a future renewal of activity derives by the basic questions regarding the nature of the current repose: due to a diminished supply of magma, related with structural condition or a sealing of the upper ascent path to the surface? Possibly the variation of structural con- ditions caused average slower ascent rates of magma favoring its cooling in the upper part of the crust, and effectively sealing the ascent path. Introduction Mount Vesuvius is presently in a quiescent stage that lasts since the eruption occurred 68 years ago, in March 1944. The current repose is the longest since 1631 when the volcano ended a centuries long quies- cence, even if dubious reports of activity refer to an eruption in 1500 [Alfano and Friedlander 1929] or some kind of activity or unrest in 1571 [Guidoboni and Boschi 2006]. The majority of sources suggest that the repose may have begun as back as 1347 or 1139. During the period 1631-1944, the longest repose period (7 years) had occurred after the eruption of 1906. Signifi- cantly, the longest reposes occurred immediately after Violent Strombolian Eruptions as defined by Macdon- ald [1972] and classified by Walker [1973], which, ac- cordingly, were termed “final” by Alfano and Friedlander [1929] and Carta et al. [1981] (Figure 1). The peculiari- ties of such eruptions were the rapid emission of a fast- moving lava flow, which eventually attained the nearby villages, a following explosive phase with high incan- descent lava jets and fountains transitional to a sus- tained buoyant column, and the collapse of the summit cone with the formation of a small caldera of hundreds of meters depth [Scandone et al. 2008] (Figure 2). This occurrence was noted several times, and the formation of a small caldera was correctly interpreted already by Breislak and Winspeare [1794] during the lateral eup- tion of 1794. They explained the decapitation of the summit of the volcano, following the explosive phase of the 1794 eruption, as caused by a collapse due to the fast emission of lava flows because in the proximity of the cone there were not enough detrital deposits justi- fying an erosion of the crater. Such an explanation put forward much of the de- bate on caldera formation of the following two centuries. It is worth mentioning that during the lateral eruptions of 1760, 1794, and 1861, the explosive phases occurred at the summit cone, and were followed by the caldera collapse thus suggesting that, even in these cases, the eruptions were fed by a central feeder dyke. We emphasize that the caldera collapse is triggered by the rapid drainage of magma residing at very shallow depth (<2 km) [Mari- anelli et al. 2005] under the cone of Vesuvius. The magma resided at shallow depth for period ranging 0-10 years [Morgan et al. 2006], before being erupted either with slow effusion or during a violent strombolian event. The sequence of the violent strombolian eruptions are driven by the arrival of fast ascending, and gas-rich magma batches that act as a piston on the shallow reservoir, giv- ing rise first to the fast lava flow, and the following explo- sive activity [Morgan et al. 2006, Scandone et al. 2008]. As mentioned before, after the most violent such episodes, the volcano entered a complete quiescence, eventually lasting for several years, and the renewal of activity, usu- ally occurred with mild strombolian activity at the bot- Article history Received May 9, 2012; accepted November 21, 2012. Subject classification: Eruption, Precursors, Vesuvius, Earthquakes. Special Issue: Vesuvius monitoring and knowledge tom of the caldera and slow lava effusion, that eventu- ally filled the caldera. These mild renewals of activity were possibly due to an incomplete sealing of the as- cent pathway following the “crater” collapses after the Violent Strombolian Eruptions. The volcano structure and the current repose The stratigraphy below Vesuvius is characterized by a sharp density transition at 2 km b.s.l. from limestone (with a density of 2500-2700 kg/m2) to loose volcanic, al- luvial and marine sediments (with an average density of 2300 kg/m2) [Berrino et al. 1998, Bruno et al. 1998]. The sedimentary fill of the Campanian plain represents a low- density barrier to the ascent of dense magma and there are strong evidences that shallow magma accumulation below this barrier provides the source for medium-sized reservoirs, which fed the plinian and sub-plinian eruptions [Delibrias et al. 1979, Barberi and Leoni 1980, Belkin and De Vivo 1993]. Hydrothermal circulation, mineral depo- sition and repeated intrusions of dykes and their rapid cooling tend to reduce the density barrier and build up a structure favourable to magma ascent. Bouguer gravi- metric anomalies of the volcano, nowadys, provide evi- dence of a shallow denser structure without very deep roots [Cassano and La Torre 1987]. A prominent high- density core has been also identified by seismic tomog- raphy [Zollo et al. 1996] concentric with the caldera structure. Seismic tomography evidenced also an ex- tended low velocity layer at about 8-10 km depth, in- terpreted as the top of a magma reservoir, having a surface area of at least 400 km2 [Auger et al. 2001]. Gravity inversion [Berrino and Camacho 2008] suggest the the upper part of Vesuvius is characterized by an high density body (density = 2450 Kg/m3) simi- lar to that of cooled lava. Such body has also a strong magnetization [Fedi et al. 1998], thus confirming the idea of a cooled magma intrusion. A shallow reservoir residing near the surface fed the persistent activity between 1631 and 1944 [Mari- anelli et al. 2005]. During this period, violent strombo- lian eruption occasionally caused small caldera collapses, and a following short repose. The caldera, formed after the eruption of 1944, was smaller than that formed after the eruption of 1906 (25×106 m3 versus 80×106 m3, reduced to 50×106 m3 after the landslides occurred be- fore the renewal of activity in 1913). Also the erupted volume was smaller than that of 1906 [Imbò 1949], even if recent estimates suggest a much larger estimate [Cole and Scarpati 2009]. There is however a strong sug- gestion that in both cases, the shallow reservoir, that had fed the strombolian activity in the previous period, was almost completely evacuated [Scandone et al. 2008]. The reservoir was located above 3 km depth from the summit (between 10 and 100 Mpa pressure) [Fulignati et al. 2004] that means immediately above the lime- stone basement that floor the sedimentary cover of the campanian plain. It is tempting to suggest that the caldera collapses cause a density decrease in the central part of the volcano with respect to the surrounding rocks, thus preventing the buoyancy ascent of degassed magmas until the condition for magma ascent are re- established by repeated intrusions and the deposition of hydrothermal minerals. After the 1944 eruption, signs of possible renewal of activity were observed in two occasions. The first significant anomalies were observed from 1952 to 1954 with an increase in the temperature of fumaroles within the crater from 350 to 600 °C [Imbò et al. 1964a] and on May 11, 1964, an earthquake swarm with a widely felt shock (Imax = 5-6 Mercalli Scale) and the for- mation of a funnel depression within the crater. [Imbò et al. 1964b] Since then, the temperature of the fu- maroles has decreased [Nazzaro 1997], but occasional earthquake swarms have been observed in 1978-80, when there was a swarm of moderate earthquakes (M<3). The most significant earthquake since 1964 oc- SCANDONE AND GIACOMELLI 2 Figure 1. Scheme of the eruptive activity between 1631 and 1944. The horizontal bars indicate periods of permanent activity. The height of the vertical bars indicate the VEI of the eruptions; F indicates the major Violent Strombolian Eruptions eventually causing a small collapse of the “crater” and a subsequent short quiescence (modified after Scandone et al. [1993]). 3 curred in 1999 with Md = 3.6, accompanied by a rela- tively small number of earthquakes with Md>1.8. Caliro et al. [ 2011] detected a significant variation in the chemical composition of fumaroles over the 1999- 2002 period, which accompanied the seismic crisis of autumn 1999, with a continuous increase in the relative concentrations of CO2 and He and a general decrease in the CH4 concentrations which were interpreted as the consequence of an increment in the relative amount of magmatic fluids in the hydrothermal system. Since 1985-86, there has been a progressive de- crease of the b-value of the earthquakes of the Guten- berg-Richter law, an alternating sequence of seismic quiescence and activity, and an increase in the observed earthquake magnitude [De Natale et al. 2004]. The source mechanisms of the major earthquakes are com- patible with isotropic components that indicate volu- metric expansion [De Natale et al. 2004]. The average depth of the earthquakes is comprised between 2 and 6 kilometers [De Natale et al. 1998, Lomax et al. 2001, De Natale et al. 2004]. The recurrence rate of seismic swarms and other unrest phenomena in the past 50 years is = 0.14 y-1, similar to the average rate of paroxistic eruptions eval- uated until 1944 (0.13 y-1) [Scandone et al. 2008]. Scandone et al. [2008] suggested that the violent strombolian eruptions were caused by fast ascending magma batches, which unplugged the upper conduit of the cooler and crystal-rich magma, and caused the following collapse of detrital material into the evacu- ated conduit. The number of violent strombolian erup- tion decreased with time and gradually made this process less effective. The volcano finally entered a qui- escent stage because the slow ascending magma was not able to reach the surface and crystallized extensively before the arrival of the next energetic magma batch (1964). The crystallized magma and the mineral depo- sition caused by the hydrothermal circulation in the upper part of the volcano formed an extensive barrier [Bons et al. 2001] which further grew because of sub- sequent intrusions (e.g. 1999-2002). Collectively these data indicate the lack of any rel- evant shallow magma chamber in the first two kilome- ters depth, like the ones feeding the persistent activity in the period between 1631 and 1944, and at the same times suggest the existence of a rigid structure with den- sity higher than the surrounding rocks, that represent a physical, unfractured barrier to the ascent of magma. We suggest that below such structure, magma has continued to intrude, occasionally with batches rising with higher velocity thus causing episodic seismic swarms. The eruptable magma depends on the ratio between the intrusion rate and the cooling rate which varies with depth and the surrounding temperature. Precursory signals for an eruption at Vesuvius Eruptions are commonly preceded by a number of precursors signalling an “anomalous” state of the vol- cano. Precursors are generally observed in the last stages of processes that lead to an eruption when magma finally approaches the surface. According to Dsurisin [2003], the absence of measurable precursors until magma begins its final ascent, is mainly a consequence of: (1) the brittle-ductile transition relatively shallow beneath most volcanoes; (2) the lack of monitoring in the types and amounts of volcanic gases emitted over time; (3) the most classical geodetic techniques are not sensitive enough to detect subtle ground deformation that might occur when magma accumulates near the brittle-ductile transition, especially if the intrusion oc- curs gradually or episodically in a series of small events. In particular, it is highly probable that the processes leading to the occurrence of an eruption of a quiescent volcano, may occur on time scales of the order of hun- dred of years, as has been proved, for example, for the Monte Nuovo eruption of Campi Flegrei in 1538, where the early signs of unrest dated back more than a century [Giacomelli and Scandone 2012]. It is otherways true, that we are more capable of detecting signs of unrest in calderas than in central volcanoes. Based on this assumptions it is likely that we are: either uncapable of detecting slow magma accumula- tion in a crustal reservoir, or we are overlooking the weak signals that the volcano may display. As mentioned in the previous paragraph, the occa- sional seismic swarms observed at Vesuvius in the last 50 years may represent a weak signal of magma accumula- PRECURSORS AT VESUVIUS Figure 2. Oblique view of the Vesuvius crater (Gran Cono) formed during the eruption of 1944. The steep walls of the crater suggest that it was formed by a collapse inside the evacuated portion of the shallow magma reservoir (<2 km) feeding the permanent activity between 1913 and 1944. On the background, the border of the Somma caldera, formed as a result of the collapses following the main plinian eruptions of the last 17,000 years. (Photo Scandone). tion. Within this frame, the renewal of volcanic activtiy may only be signalled by the fracturing of the rocks above an inferred magma accumulation zone 3-5 km deep, similar to that which fed the 1631 eruption after the last prolongued period of repose [Scaillet et al. 2008]. In this respect it is unlikely that we may observe significant changes of ground deformation or seismic- ity until the process is well underway and unlikely to stop (like for example in Campi Flegrei). In some respect, the start of precursory earth- quakes may be not much different from a “normal” seismic crisis like that observed, for example in 1999, with the main difference that it may continue with a swarm of magnitude 4 earthquakes. Roman and Kashmann [2006] suggests that two main processes dominate the seismic swarms preced- ing an eruption: – failure within the walls of inflating dikes with a local 90° stress field rotation with respect to to the axis of maximum compressive stress, – failure at the dike tip with hypocenter propaga- tion, although in some cases dike propagation may be effectively aseismic and in other cases dike inflation may be effectively aseismic. In the case of Vesuvius, Bianco et al. [1998] suggest that there are two main NNE–SSW and ESE–WNW- trending extension directions with the first one related with the regional stress field and the second, local, act- ing inside the Somma caldera. Basing also on the last renewal of activity of Vesu- vius in 1631, when the early phase of the eruption was fed by a lateral vent we may envisage a precursor sce- nario possibly into two stages: 1) Magma ascent filling a dike along the central axis of the volcano perpendicular to the local ESE– WNW-trending extension direction 2) Possible migration of hypocenters toward the SSW flank of the volcano with a possible opening of a lateral vent. Within this frame, we may expect an early swarm of VT earthquakes with mostly strike-slip mechanism oriented along an ESE–WNW trending direction, fol- lowed by a possible migration of hypocenters toward the SSW flank of Vesuvius. The depth of the earth- quakes should be in the uppermost 3 km of crust. The duration of such swarm may be as short as a few hours, as the one occurred in the night of December 16, 1631, and with an high seismic destructive potential, expe- cially in the environment of Torre del Greco as this city lies along one of the main fault systems feeding the ac- tivity of Vesuvius A short duration of the swarm and lack of LP events are likely in the case of a sudden rupture of a shallow magma reservoir and rapid magma ascent. The lack of LP earthquakes may be due to an insuffi- cient time to allow efficient degassing from the as- cending magma batch [Scandone et al. 2007]. In such case it is likely an explosive eruption with kilometers high lava-fountain and the formation of a plinian erup- tion cloud. Rapid rupturing of a crustal reservoir and the lack of efficient degassing make unlikely early de- tection of extensive geochemical anomalies within fu- maroles and water wells. A longer duration of the swarm and the occur- rence of LP earthquakes and possible lateral migration of hypocenters could be suggestive of very shallow res- idence of the ascending magma and of extensive de- gassing. This could possibly result in an early lateral effusive eruption, eventually followed by an explosive phase from the central vent, as soon as conditions for fast magma ascent are attained (e.g. 1631 or 1794 eruptions). Extensive degassing may allow detection of geochemical anomalies in fumaroles. Shallow intrusion may be also evidenced by deformation of the flank of the volcano. This picture however, does not ensure that the outbreak may be only effusive, as the opening of the ascent path may be operated by several ascending magma batches each one utilizing the path of the previous one and dis- placing or intruding the stationary early degassed magma (like in the case of Pinatubo eruption where the early degassed dome was rapidly diplaced by faster as- cending batches) [Hattori and Sato 1996]. Conclusions The analysis of the past pattern of activity, as well as recent unrest episodes at Vesuvius, suggest that the volcano is in a sort of dynamical repose where episodic input of new magma in the shallow crust (3-5 km) are not allowed to reach the surface because of a solidified plug. The lack of evidence of an extensive magma chamber in the shallow crust, suggests that most of the new magma arrivals cool rapidly. Relevant accumula- tion of enough hot magma, capable of eruption may eventually occur with an increase of the episodic supply rate. Such occurrence should be eventually detected by a higher frequency of seismic crises and possible in- crease of magmatic gas emission. We do have a relative good record of the phe- nomena preceding the last renewal of activity of 1631, after a long repose period [Alfano and Friedlander 1929, Bertagnini et al. 2006, Guidoboni 2008, Scandone and Giacomelli 2008, Guidoboni and Mariotti 2011]. The suggestion that a two-step scenario occurred at Vesuvius, in 1631, is suggested by the sequence of ob- served precursors, which records a months-week long, succession of “low intensity precursors”, not raising par- SCANDONE AND GIACOMELLI 4 5 ticular alarm, and then a climax of seismic activity in the day before the outbreak of the eruption [see for ex- ample: Braccini 1632, Guidoboni and Mariotti 2011]. The idea that high intensity, short-term precursors may be followed by an explosive eruption is based on the suggestion that short ascent times are required to prevent extensive degassing from the ascending magma batches [Scandone et al. 2007]. This requirement may be obtained also late, in the development of the erup- tion process, if precursory magma batches prepare the ascent path for later fast ascent and eventually full con- nection between the magma chamber and the surface. In this case, it is likely that a sustained plinian eruption may develop like the one of 1631 or even 79 A.D., if a large enough magma chamber formed at depth below the volcano and became connected to the surface. Such case has been observed for the eruption Pinatubo, in 1991. In that case, a slow ascending magma produced months-long precursors to the extrusion of a dome. The following explosive climax was preceded by a se- quence of of subplinian eruptions, which started three days before the cataclysmic event. The short term precursors to the climactic phase, as often occurs in many explosive eruptions, generally causes a self-evacuation of the area, and reduces the im- pact of the eruption. A self-evacuation of the area oc- curred during the 1631 eruption, but the relative, high number of casualties was due to the prohibition to the evacuees to enter Naples because the fear of plague [Giuliani 1632]. We are conscious of the multiple possibilities that may develop when a volcano come backs into activity, so that, risk scenarios cannot be based only on a single case, but must take into account also an unlikely suc- cession of events. We suggest that the population should be aware of this potential, and be made capable of reacting to unforeseen events. Acknowledgements. We acknowledge the useful suggestions provided by two anonymous referees, which greatly improved the manuscript. References Alfano, G.B., and I. Friedlaender (1929). La storia del Vesuvio illustrata da documenti coevi, Ulm, Karl Hohn Verlag, 69 pp. Auger, E., P. Gasparini, J. Virieux and A. Zollo (2001). Seismic evidence of an extended magmatic sill under the Mt. Vesuvius, Science, 294, 1510-1512. Barberi, F., and L. Leoni L. (1980). Metamorphic carbon- ate ejecta from Vesuvius plinian eruptions: evidence of the occurrence of shallow magma chambers, Bull. Volcanol., 43 (1), 107-120. Belkin, H., and B. De Vivo (1993). Fluid inclusion stud- ies of ejected nodules from plinian eruptions of Mt. Somma-Vesuvius, J. Volcanol. Geoth. Res., 58, 89-100. Berrino, G., G. Corrado and U. Riccardi (1998). Sea grav- ity data in the Gulf of Naples: a contribution to de- lineating the structural pattern of the Vesuvian area, J. Volcanol. Geoth. Res., 82, 139-150. Berrino, G., and A.G. Camacho (2008). 3D Gravity In- version by Growing Bodies and Shaping Layers at Mt. Vesuvius (Southern Italy), Pure Appl. Geophys., 165, 1095-1115; doi:10.1007/s00024-008-0348-2. Bertagnini, A., R. Cioni, E. Guidoboni, M. Rosi, A. Neri and E. Boschi (2006). Eruption early warning at Vesuvius: The A.D. 1631 lesson, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L18317; doi:10.1029/2006GL027297. Bianco, F., M. Castellano, G. Milano, G. Ventura and G. Vilardo (1998). The Somma-Vesuvius stress field: seis- mological and mesostructural data, J. Volcanol. Geoth. Res., 82, 199-218. Bons, P.D., J. Dougherty-Page and M.A. Elburgh (2001). Stepwise accumulation and ascent of magmas, J. Metamorph. Geol., 19, 625-631. Braccini, G.C. (1632). Dell’Incendio fattosi al Vesuvio a’ XVI Dicembre 1631, e delle sue cause ed effetti, Napoli, per Secondino Roncagliolo, 224 pp. Breislak, S., and A. Winspeare (1794). Memoria sul- l’eruzione del Vesuvio accaduta la sera de’ 15 giu- gno 1794, Napoli, 87 pp. Bruno, P.G., G. Cippitelli and A. Rapolla (1998). Seis- mic study of the mesozoic carbonate basement around Mt. Somma-Vesuvius, Italy, J. Volcanol. Geoth. Res., 84, 311-322. Caliro, S., G. Chiodini, R. Avino, C. Minopoli and B. Bocchino (2011). Long time-series of chemical and isotopic compositions of Vesuvius fumaroles: evi- dence for deep and shallow processes, Annals of Geophysics, 54 (2), 137-149; doi:10.4401/ag-5034. Carta, S., R. Figari, G. Sartoris, E. Sassi and R. Scan- done (1981). A statistical model of Vesuvius and its volcanological implication, Bull. Volcanol., 44 (2), 129-151. Cassano, E., and P. La Torre (1987). Geophysics, In: R. Santacroce (ed.), Somma-Vesuvius, Quaderni de “La Ricerca Scientifica”, CNR, 114 (Progetto finalizzato Geodinamica, Monografie finali, 8), 175-196. Cole, P.D., and C. Scarpati (2009). The 1944 eruption of Vesuvius, Italy: combining contemporary ac- counts and field studies for a new volcanological re- construction, Geol. Mag., 147, 391-415; doi:10.1017/ S0016756809990495. Delibrias, G., G.M. Di Paola, M. Rosi and R. Santacroce (1979). La storia del complesso eruttivo Somma- Vesuvio ricostruita dalle successioni piroclastiche del Monte Somma, Rend. Soc. It. Mineral. Petrol., PRECURSORS AT VESUVIUS 35, 411-438. De Natale, G., P. Capuano, C. Troise and A. Zollo (1998). Seismicity at Somma-Vesuvius and its implications for the 3D tomography of the volcano, J. Volcanol. Geoth. Res., 82, 175-197. De Natale, G., I. Kuznetzov, T. Kronrod, A. Peresan, A. Saraò, C. Troise and G.F. Panza (2004). Three Decades of seismic activity at Mt. Vesuvius: 1972-2000, Pure Appl. Geophys., 161, 123-144. Dsurisin, D. (2003). A Comprehensive approach to mon- itoring volcano deformation as a window on the erup- tion cycle, Reviews of Geophysics, 41, 1-29. Fedi, M., G. Florio and A. Rapolla (1998). 2.5D model- ling of Somma-Vesuvius structure by aeromagnetic data, J. Volcanol. Geoth. Res., 82, 239-247. Fulignati, P., P. Marianelli, N. Metrich, R. Santacroce and A. Sbrana (2004). Towards a reconstruction of the magmatic feeding system of the 1944 eruption of Mt. Vesuvius, J. Volcanol. Geoth. Res., 133, 13-22. Giacomelli, L., and R. Scandone (2012). History of the exploitation of thermo-mineral resources in Campi Flegrei and Ischia, Italy, J. Volcanol. Geoth. Res., 209, 19-32; doi:10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2011.10.004. Giuliani, G. (1632). Trattato del monte Vesuvio e de’ suoi incendi, Napoli, appresso Egidio Longo. Guidoboni, E., and E. Boschi (2006). Vesuvius before the 1631 Eruption, EOS, 87 (40), 417-423. Guidoboni, E. (2008). Vesuvius: A historical approach to the 1631 eruption “cold data” from the analysis of three contemporary treatises, J. Volcanol. Geoth. Res., 178, 347-358. Guidoboni, E., and D. Mariotti (2011). Vesuvius: Earth- quakes from 1600 up to the 1631 eruption, J. Vol- canol. Geoth. Res., 200, 267-272; doi:10.1016/j.jvolg eores.2010.11.021. Hattori, K., and H. Sato (1996). Magma evolution recor- ded in plagioclase zoning in 1991 Pinatubo eruption products, Am. Mineral., 81, 982-994. Imbò, G. (1949) L’attività eruttiva vesuviana e relative osservazioni nel corso dell’intervallo 1906-1944 ed in particolare del parossismo del Marzo 1944, An- nali dell’Osservatorio Vesuviano, Ser. V (single vol- ume), 185-380. Imbò, G., L. Casertano and V. Bonasia (1964a). Attività vesuviana negli ultimi anni dell’attuale riposo, An- nali dell’Osservatorio Vesuviano, Ser. VI, 6, 189-204. Imbò, G., L. Casertano and V. Bonasia (1964b). Con- siderazioni sismo-gravimetriche sulle manifestazio- ni vesuviane del maggio 1964, Annali dell’Osserva- torio Vesuviano, Ser. VI, 6, 177-188. Lomax, A., A. Zollo, P. Capuano and J. Virieux (2001). Precise, absolute earthquake location under Somma- Vesuvius volcano using a new 3D velocity model, Geophys. J. Int., 146, 313-331. Macdonald, G.A. (1972). Volcanoes, Englewood Cliffs (New Jersey), Prentice-Hall Inc., 510 pp. Marianelli, P., A. Sbrana, N. Metrich and A. Cecchetti (2005). The deep feeding system of Vesuvius in- volved in recent violent strombolian eruptions, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32 (2), L02306; doi:10.1029/20 04GL021667. Morgan, D.J., S. Blake, N.W. Rogers, B. De Vivo, G. Rolandi and J.P. Davidson (2006). Magma chamber recharge in the century prior to the eruption of A.D. 79, Geology, 34, 845-848; doi:10.1130/G22604.1. Nazzaro, A. (1997). Il Vesuvio: Storia Eruttiva e Teorie Vulcanologiche, Napoli, Liguori Editore, 374 pp. Roman, D.C., and K.V. Kashmann (2006). The origin of volcano-tectonic earthquake swarms, Geology, 34, 457-460; doi:10.1130/G22269.1. Scaillet, B., M. Pichavant and R. Cioni (2008). Upward migration of Vesuvius magma chamber over the past 20,000 years, Nature, 455, 216-219; doi:10.1038/ nature07232. Scandone, R., L. Giacomelli and P. Gasparini (1993). Mount Vesuvius: 2000 years of volcanological ob- servations, J. Volcanol. Geoth. Res., 58, 5-25. Scandone, R., K. Cashman and S.D. Malone (2007). Magma Supply, Magma Ascent and the Style of Vol- canic Eruptions, Ea. Plane. Sci. Lett., 253, 513-529; doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2006.11.016. Scandone, R., and L. Giacomelli L. (2008). Precursors of eruptions at Vesuvius (Italy), J. Volcanol. Geoth. Res., 171, 191-200; doi:10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2007. 11.018. Scandone, R., L. Giacomelli and F. Fattori Speranza (2008). Persistent Activity and Violent Strombolian Eruptions at Vesuvius between 1631 and 1944, J. Volcanol. Geoth. Res., 170, 167-180; doi:10.1016/j. jvolgeores.2007.09.014. Walker, G.P.L. (1973). Exlposive volcanic eruptions – a new classification scheme, Geol. Rund., 62, 431-446. Zollo, A., P. Gasparini, J. Virieux, H. Le Meur, G. de Na- tale, G. Biella, E. Boschi, P. Capuano, R. de Franco, P. dell’Aversana, R. de Matteis, I. Guerra, G. Ian- naccone, L. Mirabile and G. Vilardo (1996). Seismic evidence for a low-velocity zone in the upper crust beneath Mount Vesuvius, Science, 274, 592-594. *Corresponding author: Roberto Scandone, Università di Roma Tre, Dipartimento di Matematica e Fisica, Rome, Italy; email: scandone@uniroma3.it. © 2013 by the Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia. All rights reserved. SCANDONE AND GIACOMELLI 6 << /ASCII85EncodePages false /AllowTransparency false /AutoPositionEPSFiles false /AutoRotatePages /None /Binding /Left /CalGrayProfile (Dot Gain 20%) /CalRGBProfile (sRGB IEC61966-2.1) /CalCMYKProfile (U.S. Web Coated \050SWOP\051 v2) /sRGBProfile (sRGB IEC61966-2.1) /CannotEmbedFontPolicy /Warning /CompatibilityLevel 1.3 /CompressObjects /Tags /CompressPages true /ConvertImagesToIndexed true /PassThroughJPEGImages true /CreateJobTicket false /DefaultRenderingIntent /Default /DetectBlends true /DetectCurves 0.1000 /ColorConversionStrategy /LeaveColorUnchanged /DoThumbnails false /EmbedAllFonts true /EmbedOpenType false /ParseICCProfilesInComments true /EmbedJobOptions true /DSCReportingLevel 0 /EmitDSCWarnings false /EndPage -1 /ImageMemory 1048576 /LockDistillerParams true /MaxSubsetPct 100 /Optimize false /OPM 1 /ParseDSCComments true /ParseDSCCommentsForDocInfo true /PreserveCopyPage true /PreserveDICMYKValues true /PreserveEPSInfo true /PreserveFlatness true /PreserveHalftoneInfo false /PreserveOPIComments false /PreserveOverprintSettings true /StartPage 1 /SubsetFonts true /TransferFunctionInfo /Apply /UCRandBGInfo /Preserve /UsePrologue false /ColorSettingsFile (None) /AlwaysEmbed [ true /AndaleMono /Apple-Chancery /Arial-Black /Arial-BoldItalicMT /Arial-BoldMT /Arial-ItalicMT /ArialMT /CapitalsRegular /Charcoal /Chicago /ComicSansMS /ComicSansMS-Bold /Courier /Courier-Bold /CourierNewPS-BoldItalicMT /CourierNewPS-BoldMT /CourierNewPS-ItalicMT /CourierNewPSMT /GadgetRegular /Geneva /Georgia /Georgia-Bold /Georgia-BoldItalic /Georgia-Italic /Helvetica /Helvetica-Bold /HelveticaInserat-Roman /HoeflerText-Black /HoeflerText-BlackItalic /HoeflerText-Italic /HoeflerText-Ornaments /HoeflerText-Regular /Impact /Monaco /NewYork /Palatino-Bold /Palatino-BoldItalic /Palatino-Italic /Palatino-Roman /SandRegular /Skia-Regular /Symbol /TechnoRegular /TextileRegular /Times-Bold /Times-BoldItalic /Times-Italic /Times-Roman /TimesNewRomanPS-BoldItalicMT /TimesNewRomanPS-BoldMT /TimesNewRomanPS-ItalicMT /TimesNewRomanPSMT /Trebuchet-BoldItalic /TrebuchetMS /TrebuchetMS-Bold /TrebuchetMS-Italic /Verdana /Verdana-Bold /Verdana-BoldItalic /Verdana-Italic /Webdings ] /NeverEmbed [ true ] /AntiAliasColorImages false /CropColorImages true /ColorImageMinResolution 150 /ColorImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleColorImages true /ColorImageDownsampleType /Bicubic /ColorImageResolution 300 /ColorImageDepth -1 /ColorImageMinDownsampleDepth 1 /ColorImageDownsampleThreshold 1.10000 /EncodeColorImages true /ColorImageFilter /DCTEncode /AutoFilterColorImages true /ColorImageAutoFilterStrategy /JPEG /ColorACSImageDict << /QFactor 0.15 /HSamples [1 1 1 1] /VSamples [1 1 1 1] >> /ColorImageDict << /QFactor 0.15 /HSamples [1 1 1 1] /VSamples [1 1 1 1] >> /JPEG2000ColorACSImageDict << /TileWidth 256 /TileHeight 256 /Quality 30 >> /JPEG2000ColorImageDict << /TileWidth 256 /TileHeight 256 /Quality 30 >> /AntiAliasGrayImages false /CropGrayImages true /GrayImageMinResolution 150 /GrayImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleGrayImages true /GrayImageDownsampleType /Bicubic /GrayImageResolution 300 /GrayImageDepth -1 /GrayImageMinDownsampleDepth 2 /GrayImageDownsampleThreshold 1.10000 /EncodeGrayImages true /GrayImageFilter /DCTEncode /AutoFilterGrayImages true /GrayImageAutoFilterStrategy /JPEG /GrayACSImageDict << /QFactor 0.15 /HSamples [1 1 1 1] /VSamples [1 1 1 1] >> /GrayImageDict << /QFactor 0.15 /HSamples [1 1 1 1] /VSamples [1 1 1 1] >> /JPEG2000GrayACSImageDict << /TileWidth 256 /TileHeight 256 /Quality 30 >> /JPEG2000GrayImageDict << /TileWidth 256 /TileHeight 256 /Quality 30 >> /AntiAliasMonoImages false /CropMonoImages true /MonoImageMinResolution 1200 /MonoImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleMonoImages true /MonoImageDownsampleType /Bicubic /MonoImageResolution 1200 /MonoImageDepth -1 /MonoImageDownsampleThreshold 1.08250 /EncodeMonoImages true /MonoImageFilter /CCITTFaxEncode /MonoImageDict << /K -1 >> /AllowPSXObjects false /CheckCompliance [ /None ] /PDFX1aCheck false /PDFX3Check false /PDFXCompliantPDFOnly false /PDFXNoTrimBoxError true /PDFXTrimBoxToMediaBoxOffset [ 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 ] /PDFXSetBleedBoxToMediaBox true /PDFXBleedBoxToTrimBoxOffset [ 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 ] /PDFXOutputIntentProfile (None) /PDFXOutputConditionIdentifier () /PDFXOutputCondition () /PDFXRegistryName (http://www.color.org) /PDFXTrapped /Unknown /CreateJDFFile false /SyntheticBoldness 1.000000 /Description << /ENU (Use these settings to create PDF documents with higher image resolution for high quality pre-press printing. The PDF documents can be opened with Acrobat and Reader 5.0 and later. These settings require font embedding.) /JPN /FRA /DEU /PTB /DAN /NLD /ESP /SUO /NOR /SVE /KOR /CHS /CHT /ITA >> >> setdistillerparams << /HWResolution [2400 2400] /PageSize [595.000 842.000] >> setpagedevice