Sensitivities of surface wave velocities to the medium parameters in a radially anisotropic spherical Earth and inversion strategies ANNALS OF GEOPHYSICS, 58, 5, 2015, S0545; doi:10.4401/ag-6806 S0545 Sensitivities of surface wave velocities to the medium parameters in a radially anisotropic spherical Earth and inversion strategies Sankar N. Bhattacharya Lithosphere Study Centre, New Delhi, India ABSTRACT Sensitivity kernels or partial derivatives of phase velocity (c) and group velocity (U) with respect to medium parameters are useful to interpret a given set of observed surface wave velocity data. In addition to phase velocities, group velocities are also being observed to find the radial anisotropy of the crust and mantle. However, sensitivities of group ve- locity for a radially anisotropic Earth have rarely been studied. Here we show sensitivities of group velocity along with those of phase velocity to the medium parameters VSV, VSH, VPV, VPH, h and density in a radi- ally anisotropic spherical Earth. The peak sensitivities for U are generally twice of those for c; thus U is more efficient than c to explore anisotropic nature of the medium. Love waves mainly depends on VSH while Rayleigh waves is nearly independent of VSH. The sensitivities show that there are trade-offs among these parameters during inversion and there is a need to reduce the number of parameters to be evaluated independently. It is sug- gested to use a nonlinear inversion jointly for Rayleigh and Love waves; in such a nonlinear inversion best solutions are obtained among the model parameters within prescribed limits for each parameter. We first choose VSH, VSV and VPH within their corresponding limits; VPV and h can be evaluated from empirical relations among the parameters. The den- sity has small effect on surface wave velocities and it can be considered from other studies or from empirical relation of density to average P- wave velocity. 1. Introduction A transversely isotropic elastic medium with ver- tical axis of symmetry or radially anisotropic medium is described by the medium parameters: density t, wave velocity of horizontally and vertically travelling P-waves VPH and VPV, vertically and horizontally polarised S- waves VSV and VSH and the parameter h as described by Takeuchi and Saito [1972]. These parameters are linked with 5 elastic moduli as A = tV 2PH, C = tV 2 PV, L = tV 2 SV, N = tV 2SH and F = ht(V 2 PH − 2 V 2 SV). A seismic anisotropy is created by fabric induced from deformation in the crust and mantle; this causes dependence of local wave propagation on the direction and polarization of wave field [Chen et al. 2009]. A layer with VSH > VSV associ- ated with horizontal flow such as underneath plates; a vertical flow creates VSH < VSV as underneath spreading centres or subduction zones. Thus knowledge of seis- mic anisotropy allows us to understand the Earth’s dy- namic evaluation. Radial anisotropy in the uppermost mantle was considered to explain the fundamental modes of both Rayleigh and Love wave phase velocities, particularly, when isotropic structure failed to do so [Anderson 1961, McEvilly 1964]. Several such results led to incor- poration of radial anisotropy in the top 220 km of the mantle in Preliminary Reference Earth Model (PREM; Dziewonski and Anderson [1981]). Since then surface wave studies have confirmed such anisotropy in many regions [e.g. Villasenor et al. 2001, Bhattacharya et al. 2013] and might be deeper in some cases [Visser et al. 2008]. With the availability of broadband data globally, 3-D global maps of radial anisotropy of uppermost mantle have been prepared [Panning and Romanowicz 2006, Kustowski et al. 2008]. Radial anisotropy in the crust has also been ob- served in Himalaya and Tibet [Shapiro et al. 2004, Xie et al. 2013] and SE Europe [Raykova and Nikolova 2003]. Radial anisotropy in the crust has been noted in the extensional provinces such as, western United States [Moschetti et al. 2010] and off-coast of western India [Prajapati et al. 2011]. Sensitivity study of surface wave velocity to medium parameters is important to interpret a set of observed surface wave velocity data. Changes in period in a given mode of spheroidal and toroidal oscillations to medium parameters of a radially anisotropic Earth were shown by Anderson [1989] and Montagner [2007]. Sensitivities of phase velocity at different periods to such medium parameters were shown in a few studies [e.g. Takeuchi and Saito 1972]. Muyzert and Snieder [2000] compared Article history Received June 14, 2015; accepted September 23, 2015. Subject classification: Crust-mantle structure, Radial anisotropy, Surface waves. phase velocity sensitivities to Love parameters [mL] = [A,C,L,N,F, t] and those to Anderson parameters [mA] = [VSV, VSH, VPV, VPH, h, t]. Thus there are a few studies on sensitivities of phase velocities but rarely any study on those of group velocities. In recent years group velocities are also being used to find the radial anisotropy of the crust and man- tle [e.g. Shapiro and Ritzwoller 2002, Shapiro et al. 2004, Chen et al. 2009]. To fill up the gap we show here the sensitivities of group velocity along with those of phase velocity of fundamental mode to medium pa- rameters [mA] in a spherical Earth. We also suggest a few inversion strategies based on these sensitivities. 2. Computations of sensitivities For Rayleigh wave, Bhattacharya and Arora [1997] obtained dispersion equation in a radially anisotropic layered spherical Earth considering each layer to be het- erogeneous as [A, C, L, N, F,t] = [A0, C0, L0, N0, F0,t0 (r/a) -2] (r/a)-2 (1) where A0, C0, L0, N0, F0 and t0 are constants, a is the ra- dius of the Earth and r is the radial distance from the centre of the Earth. Considering the layer thickness to be small compared to the wavelength, the layer behaves nearly like a homogeneous layer [Bhattacharya 1976]. Advantage of such small heterogeneity is to get solutions of the equations of motions in terms of exponential functions making the dispersion equation as simple as that for a flat layered Earth. We call ‘exact flattening transformation’ since we use the exact solutions of equa- tion of motion in terms of exponential functions as in a flat Earth. The dispersion equation is obtained from that of a flat layered Earth by changing displacement- stress matrix [Bhattacharya and Arora 1997]. For Love waves, equation of motion is simple [Takeuchi and Saito 1972] and its solution is obtained in terms of exponential functions with same heterogene- ity as (1) in a layer. The dispersion equation of Love waves through exact flattening transformation can be obtained by changing displacement-stress matrix of a flat layered Earth as done for an isotropic case [Bhattacharya 2009]. The displacement-stress matrix of radially anisotropic spherical Earth with flattening transformation will be same as Bhattacharya ([2009]; Eq. (7) with p = −2) by replacing n0 by L0 and considering ob 2 as Let us consider the dispersion equation as f(k,~) = 0, where k is the wave number and ~ is the angular fre- quency. For a given value of period (T = 2r/~), phase velocity (c = ~/k) is obtained as a root of the disper- sion equation through bisection method. The group ve- locity (U) is obtained as [Stein and Wysession 2003] where the above partial derivatives in the numerator and denominator at a root are obtained from analyti- cal expressions of f. To compute the sensitivities or partial derivatives of c and U with respect to each model parameter of a given crust-mantle structure, we consider PREM, which represents an average Earth model. For a particular re- gion such sensitivities can be drawn in a similar man- ner. PREM has 3 km oceanic layer and crust extends down to 24.5 km. Between depths 24.5 and 220 km, the model is radially anisotropic; but we have made this zone isotropic with effective isotropic velocities as sug- gested by Dziewonski and Anderson [1981]. Thus we consider a radially anisotropic PREM with simplifica- tion that VSV = VSH, VPV = VPH, and h = 1 (Figure 1). Although such simplification makes the model to be isotropic, however the sensitivities each parameter of [mA] will show how c and U changes as each parameter changes from isotropic to radially anisotropic as done for c in Muyzert and Snieder [2000]; however, t changes show sensitivities for an isotropic PREM model. We change each element of [mA] in a layer of 1 km centred at a given depth to get the following dimensionless L L N k a a4 9 4 12 0 2 0 0 0 2 2 2o ~ t =- + - + b S X U dk d~ = =- /f /f , /f2 /f2 k kVf2 2 f2 2 ~ ~V Q Q ~V kV BHATTACHARYA 2 Figure 1. PREM with effective isotropic velocities at 100 s period [Dziewonski and Anderson 1981]. We change each elements of [mA] = [VSV, VSH, VPV, VPH, h, t] to get the corresponding partial de- rivatives in Figures 2 and 3. 3 partial derivatives for a given period T by numerical dif- ferentiation where v = either c or U; tm is the density in the mantle just below Moho and cT is the phase velocity at the pe- riod T. The Love wave is independent of VPV, VPH and h. We use tm = 3.38 gm/cm 3. We obtain partial deriv- atives of fundamental mode c and U at periods 20, 50, 100 and 200 s (Figures 2 and 3) 3. Discussions The sensitivities or partial derivatives shown in Fig- ures 2 and 3 allow us to find the depth to which we can explore and find a strategy to improve the exploration with a given set of observed surface wave velocity data. Both for Rayleigh and Love waves, peak partial deriva- tives of U are normally twice of those of c; this makes U more useful than c. However, measurement of phase velocity is more accurate than that of group velocity in a few cases [Suresh et al. 2015]. The partial derivatives of U to velocities have peaks in the positive and negative sides with a deepest zero crossing at a depth about m/2 for Rayleigh waves and about m/3 for Love waves, where m (= T * cT) is the wavelength; below this depth the partial derivatives are small. The deepest zero cross- ing depths of sensitivities for all the parameters are close to each other. At zero-crossing depth of a period, the medium parameters are explored by other periods for which sensitivities are non-zero at that depth. Thus with a given set of group velocity data, we can approx- imately explore down to the deepest depth of zero crossing of the highest period available in the set. For Rayleigh waves, depth of peak sensitivity increases with period; but for Love waves it slightly increases with pe- riod but mostly remains in the crust and close to Moho. In isotropic case, similar characteristics of sensitivities to VS were noted [Levedev et al. 2013]. In an isotropic Earth, Dahlen and Tromp [1998] noted that phase ve- locities feel perturbations of VS down to ~m/2 for Rayleigh waves and ~m/4 for Love waves. The large values of sensitivities of Rayleigh and Love waves to the model parameters of crust and close to Moho ne- cessitates us to evaluate parameters of this zone care- fully while exploring deeper part [Ferreira et al. 2010, Panning et al. 2010]. As is well known, Love waves do not depend on VPV, VPH and h. Sensitivities of Rayleigh wave velocity to VPV and VPH are substantial. These two sensitivities are generally of opposite signs at given depth; thus in- crease of one and decrease of other affect surface wave velocity as significantly as by change of VSV [Anderson 1989]. For an isotropic case, opposite signs of sensitivi- ties cancel approximately and sensitivity of VP is only about 10 per cent of that to VS [Suresh et al. 2015]. For Love waves, sensitivity to VSH is large but neg- ligible to VSV. Thus the velocities of Love waves com- puted in an isotropic medium with VS is nearly same as those computed in a radially anisotropic medium with VSH = VS and VSV may have any value and may be ob- tained from Rayleigh wave inversion. On the other hand, Rayleigh wave is nearly indifferent of VSH. Hence the velocities of Rayleigh waves computed in an isotropic medium with VS and VP will be nearly same as those computed in a radially anisotropic medium with VSV = VS and VSH may be have any value and may be obtained from Love wave inversion; here we assume VPV = VPH = VP and h = 1. This criteria have been used by a few authors while inverting radial anisotropy [Raykova and Nikolova 2003, Bjarnason and Schmeling 2009, Prajapati et al. 2011]. Although such computation using computational codes of a isotropic medium is nearly correct for Love waves, but for Rayleigh waves the assumption of an anisotropic medium with VSV ≠ VSH, VPV = VPH and h = 1 is not strictly correct [Babuska and Cara 1991, Xie et al. 2013]. In real mineral assem- blages, VS anisotropy would be accompanied by VP anisotropy with h ≠ 1. Further, assumption of VPV = VPH may over estimate of S-wave anisotropy because part of changes in phase/group velocities by changing VSV may be obtained by changing VPV and VPH. The sensitivity to the fifth parameter h is also sig- nificant. Figure 2 shows (^v/^h)/cT; the factor 1/cT has been considered to make the sensitivity dimensionless. Density t of the crust mainly influences Love wave ve- locities (c or U) at all periods. Sensitivity of Rayleigh wave velocity to t is small but significant; depth of peak sensitivity increases with period. However, it is felt that we should restrict the inversion to first five parameters and density can be obtained from gravity studies or from an empirical formula using average P-wave velocity. As stated above, observed Love wave velocities can be easily inverted to give VSH. For Rayleigh waves, the sensitivities of velocities c and U to VSV, VPV, VPH and h show trade-offs; i.e. increase or decrease of one will have nearly same effect on velocities by increase or de- crease of the others. So even independent evaluation of all VSV, VPV, VPH and h from Rayleigh waves may not give correct result. It is suggested that we can explore two parameters: VSV, and either VPV or VPH. The re- maining two may be obtained from empirical relations of real mineral assemblages such as [Xie et al. 2013] f ≈ 0.5c, h ≈ 1.0 − 4.2c , , , , , ,VS v VS v VP v VP v c v c v1 VSV VSH VPV VPHPH T T m 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 h t t # & SENSITIVITIES OF SURFACE WAVE VELOCITIES (2a,b) BHATTACHARYA 4 F ig u re 2 .S en si ti vi ty k er ne ls o r, p ar ti al d er iv at iv es o f R ay le ig h w av e fu nd am en ta l m od e ph as e ve lo ci ty c (l ef t si de ) a nd g ro u p ve lo ci ty U (r ig ht s id e) w it h re sp ec t to m ed iu m p ar am et er s of a r ad ia lly a ni so tr op ic m ed iu m . T he p ar ti al d er iv at iv es a re b as ed o n ef fe ct iv e is ot ro pi c P R E M ( se e te xt ). t m (= 3. 38 g m /c m 3 ) is t he d en si ty in t he m an tl e ju st b el ow M oh o an d c T is t he p ha se v el oc it y at p er io d T . ( a) T = 2 0 s, ( b) T = 50 s , ( c) T = 1 00 s a nd ( d) T = 2 00 s . 5 SENSITIVITIES OF SURFACE WAVE VELOCITIES F ig u re 3 .S am e as F ig u re 1 fo r L ov e w av es . where c = (VSH − VSV)/VS , f = (VPH − VPV)/VP and effective Voigt average speed [Babuska and Cara 1991] VS = √[(2V 2 SV + V 2 SH)/3] and VP = √[(V 2 PV + 4V 2 PH)/5]. We write (3b) as VPV = VPH − f VP We first consider values of VSH, VSV and VPH The pa- rameter h can be obtained from (2b) after obtaining c from (3a). We preferred first to consider VPH rather than VPV because as per Equation (4b), we may approximate VP ≈ VPH. Thus from (5) we get VPV ≈ (1 − f) VPH as a first approximation. Substituting this expression of VPV in (4b) we get second approximation of VP as VP ≈ (1 − f/5) VPH Substituting in (5), we get second approximation of VPV as VPV ≈ (1 − f + f 2/5) VPH . To evaluate radial anisotropy, Love and Rayleigh waves need to be inverted jointly with nonlinear inver- sion where the best solution are obtained among the model parameters within prescribed upper and lower limits for each parameter [Suresh et al. 2008, Prajapati et al. 2011]. For these model parameters, we first choose VSH, VSV and VPH within their corresponding limits and the remaining parameters VPV, h and t can be obtained as discussed above. 4. Conclusions (i) Love wave velocities in a radially anisotropic medium are close to those in an isotropic medium with VS = VSH. The VS, obtained from inversion of only Love wave velocities through isotropic code, is close to VSH, if the medium is radially anisotropic. (ii) However, Rayleigh wave velocities in a radially anisotropic medium can only be approximated by an isotropic code with VS = VSV under the assumption that VPV = VPH = VP and h = 1; this assumption is not strictly correct if VSV ≠ VSH. Further assumption of VPV = VPH may cause over estimation of S-wave anisotropy. (iii) Sensitivity being greater, group velocity is more efficient than phase velocity to explore anisotropic nature of the medium. The depth limit of inversion is ascertained by the deepest depth of zero crossing of the sensitivities at the highest period avail- able in the data set. This depth is about half the wave- length for Rayleigh waves and about one-third of wavelength for Love waves (iv) Through Rayleigh waves, both VPV and VPH in radially anisotropic medium are better explored than exploring VP in an isotropic medium. (v) VSH is evaluated from Love waves and this eval- uation is nearly independent of Rayleigh waves. It is evaluated well for the lithosphere below which the sen- sitivity of Love wave velocity to VSH rapidly decreases. (vi) To evaluate radial anisotropy, we need a joint nonlinear inversion of observed velocities of Rayleigh and Love waves. In such nonlinear inversion the best solutions are chosen among the model parameters, each within given upper and lower limits. We first choose VSH, VSV and VPH within their corresponding limits and VPV and h are obtained from empirical rela- tions. The density (t) has only small effect on surface waves and it can be considered from other studies or can be obtained using the empirical relation of density with average P-wave velocity at that depth. References Anderson, D.L. (1961). Elastic wave propagation in lay- ered anisotropic media, J. Geophys. Res., 66, 2953- 2963. Anderson, D.L. (1989). Theory of the Earth, Boston, Blackwell Scientific Publications; http://resolver. caltech.edu/CaltechBook:1989.001 Babuska, V., and M. Cara (1991). Seismic anisotropy of the Earth, Boston, Kluwer Acad. Bhattacharya, S.N. (1976). The extension of Thomson- Haskell method to non-homogeneous spherical lay- ers, Geophys. J. Roy. Astro. Soc., 47, 411-444. Bhattacharya, S.N., and S. Arora (1997). A flattening transformation for P-SV waves in a transversely isotropic Earth, B. Seismol. Soc. Am., 87, 1297-1304. Bhattacharya, S.N. (2009). Computation of surface wave velocities in an isotropic non-gravitating spherical Earth using an exact flattening transformation, B. Seismol. Soc. Am., 99, 3525-3528. Bhattacharya, S.N., S. Mitra and G. Suresh (2013). The shear wave velocity of the upper mantle beneath the Bay of Bengal, Northeast Indian Ocean from in- terstation phase velocities of surface waves, Geo- phys. J. Int., 193, 1506-1514. Bjarnason, I.T., and H. Schmeling (2009). The lithosphere and asthenosphere of the Iceland hotspot from sur- face waves, Geophys. J. Int., 178, 394-418. Chen, Y., J. Badal and Z. Zhang (2009). Radial anisotropy in the crust and upper mantle beneath the Qinghai- Tibet plateau and surrounding regions, J. Asian BHATTACHARYA 6 (3a,b) (4a,b) (5) (6) 7 Earth Sci., 36, 289-302. Dahlen, F.A., and J. Tromp (1998). Theoretical Global Seismology, Princeton, New Jersey, Princeton Uni- versity Press. Dziewonski, A.M., and D.L. Andersion (1981). Prelim- inary reference Earth model, Phys. Earth Planet. In., 25, 297-356. Ferreira, A.M.G., J.H. Woodhouse, K. Visser and J. Trampert (2010). On the robustness of global radi- ally anisotropic surface wave tomography, J. Geo- phys. Res., 115, B04313; doi:10:1029/2009JB006718. Kustowski, B., G. Ekström and A.M. Dziewonski (2008). Anisotropic shear-wave velocity structure of the Earth’s mantle: A global model, J. Geophys. Res., 113, B06306; doi:10.1029/2007B005169. Lebedev, S., J.M.C. Adam and T. Meier (2013). Mapping the Moho with seismic surface waves: A review res- olution analysis and recommended inversion strate- gies, Tectophysics, 609, 377-394. McEvilly, T.V. (1964). Central US crust-upper mantle structure from Love and Rayleigh wave phase ve- locity inversion, B. Seismol. Soc. Am., 54, 1997-2015. Montagner, J.P. (2007). Deep Earth structure - upper mantle structure: Global isotropic and anisotropic elastic tomography, Treatise on Geophysics, vol. 1, Elsevier. Moschetti, M.P., M.H. Ritzwoller, F. Lin and Y. Yang (2010). Seismic evidence for widespread western-US deep-crustal deformation caused by extension, Na- ture, 464, 885-889. Muyzert, E., and R. Snieder (2000). An alternative pa- rameterisation for surface waves in a transverse isotropic medium, Phys. Earth Planet. In., 118, 125- 133. Panning, M.P., and B.A. Romanowicz (2006). A three- dimensional radially anisotropic model of shear ve- locity in the whole mantle, Geophys. J. Int., 167, 361-379. Panning, M.P., V. Lekic and B.A. Romanowicz (2010). Importance of crustal correction in the development of a new global model of radial anisotropy, J. Geo- phys. Res., 115, B04313; doi:10:1029/ 2010JB007520. Prajapati, S., G. Suresh and S.N. Bhattacharya (2011). Crustal Structure of the Northwest Deccan Volcanic Province, India and the Adjoining Continental Shelf from Observed Surface Wave Dispersion, B. Seismol. Soc. Am., 101, 1488-1495. Raykova, R.B., and S.B. Nikolova (2003). Anisotropy in the Earth’s crust and uppermost mantle in south- eastern Europe obtained from Rayleigh and Love surface waves, J. Appl. Geophys., 54, 247-256. Shapiro, N.M., and M.H. Ritzwoller (2002). Monte- Carlo inversion for a global shear-velocity of the crust and upper mantle, Geophys. J. Int., 151, 88-105. Shapiro, N.M., M.H. Ritzwoller, P. Molnar and V. Levin (2004). Thinning and flow of Tibetan crust con- strained by anisotropy, Science, 305, 233-236. Stein, S., and M. Wysession (2003). An introduction to seismology, earthquakes, and Earth structure, Black- well Publishing. Suresh, G., S. Jain and S.N. Bhattacharya (2008). Litho- sphere of the Indus block in NW Indian subcontinent through genetic algorithm inversion of surface wave dispersion, B. Seismol. Soc. Am., 98, 1750-1755. Suresh, G., S.N. Bhattacharya and S.S. Teotia (2015). Crust and upper mantle velocity structure of the northwestern Indian Peninsular Shield from inter- station phase velocities of Rayleigh and Love waves, Annals of Geophysics, 58 (2), S0215; doi:10.4401/ag- 6674. Takeuchi, H., and M. Saito (1972). Seismic surface waves, In: B.A. Bolt (ed.), Seismology: surface waves and Earth oscillations (Methods in Computational Physics, vol. 11), New York, Academic Press. Villasenor, A., M.H. Ritzwoller, A.L. Levshin, M.P. Barmin, E.R. Engdahl, W. Spakman and J. Trampert (2001). Shear velocity structure of central Eurasia from inversion of surface wave velocities, Phys. Earth Planet. In., 123, 169-184. Visser, K, J. Trampert, S. Levedev and B.L.N. Kennett (2008). Probability of radial anisotropy in the deep mantle, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 270, 241-250. Xie, J., M.H. Ritzwoller, W. Shen, Y. Yang, Y. Zheng and L. Zhou (2013). Crustal anisotropy across eastern Tibet and the western Yangtze Craton, J. Geophys. Res., 118, 4226-4252; doi:10.1002/jgrb.50296. Corresponding author: Sankar N. Bhattacharya, Lithosphere Study Centre, New Delhi, India; email: sn_bhattacharya@hotmail.com. © 2015 by the Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia. All rights reserved. SENSITIVITIES OF SURFACE WAVE VELOCITIES << /ASCII85EncodePages false /AllowTransparency false /AutoPositionEPSFiles false /AutoRotatePages /None /Binding /Left /CalGrayProfile (Dot Gain 20%) /CalRGBProfile (sRGB IEC61966-2.1) /CalCMYKProfile (U.S. Web Coated \050SWOP\051 v2) /sRGBProfile (sRGB IEC61966-2.1) /CannotEmbedFontPolicy /Warning /CompatibilityLevel 1.3 /CompressObjects /Tags /CompressPages true /ConvertImagesToIndexed true /PassThroughJPEGImages true /CreateJobTicket false /DefaultRenderingIntent /Default /DetectBlends true /DetectCurves 0.1000 /ColorConversionStrategy /LeaveColorUnchanged /DoThumbnails false /EmbedAllFonts true /EmbedOpenType false /ParseICCProfilesInComments true /EmbedJobOptions true /DSCReportingLevel 0 /EmitDSCWarnings false /EndPage -1 /ImageMemory 1048576 /LockDistillerParams true /MaxSubsetPct 100 /Optimize false /OPM 1 /ParseDSCComments true /ParseDSCCommentsForDocInfo true /PreserveCopyPage true /PreserveDICMYKValues true /PreserveEPSInfo true /PreserveFlatness true /PreserveHalftoneInfo false /PreserveOPIComments false /PreserveOverprintSettings true /StartPage 1 /SubsetFonts true /TransferFunctionInfo /Apply /UCRandBGInfo /Preserve /UsePrologue false /ColorSettingsFile (None) /AlwaysEmbed [ true /AndaleMono /Apple-Chancery /Arial-Black /Arial-BoldItalicMT /Arial-BoldMT /Arial-ItalicMT /ArialMT /CapitalsRegular /Charcoal /Chicago /ComicSansMS /ComicSansMS-Bold /Courier /Courier-Bold /CourierNewPS-BoldItalicMT /CourierNewPS-BoldMT /CourierNewPS-ItalicMT /CourierNewPSMT /GadgetRegular /Geneva /Georgia /Georgia-Bold /Georgia-BoldItalic /Georgia-Italic /Helvetica /Helvetica-Bold /HelveticaInserat-Roman /HoeflerText-Black /HoeflerText-BlackItalic /HoeflerText-Italic /HoeflerText-Ornaments /HoeflerText-Regular /Impact /Monaco /NewYork /Palatino-Bold /Palatino-BoldItalic /Palatino-Italic /Palatino-Roman /SandRegular /Skia-Regular /Symbol /TechnoRegular /TextileRegular /Times-Bold /Times-BoldItalic /Times-Italic /Times-Roman /TimesNewRomanPS-BoldItalicMT /TimesNewRomanPS-BoldMT /TimesNewRomanPS-ItalicMT /TimesNewRomanPSMT /Trebuchet-BoldItalic /TrebuchetMS /TrebuchetMS-Bold /TrebuchetMS-Italic /Verdana /Verdana-Bold /Verdana-BoldItalic /Verdana-Italic /Webdings ] /NeverEmbed [ true ] /AntiAliasColorImages false /CropColorImages true /ColorImageMinResolution 150 /ColorImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleColorImages true /ColorImageDownsampleType /Bicubic /ColorImageResolution 300 /ColorImageDepth -1 /ColorImageMinDownsampleDepth 1 /ColorImageDownsampleThreshold 1.10000 /EncodeColorImages true /ColorImageFilter /DCTEncode /AutoFilterColorImages true /ColorImageAutoFilterStrategy /JPEG /ColorACSImageDict << /QFactor 0.15 /HSamples [1 1 1 1] /VSamples [1 1 1 1] >> /ColorImageDict << /QFactor 0.15 /HSamples [1 1 1 1] /VSamples [1 1 1 1] >> /JPEG2000ColorACSImageDict << /TileWidth 256 /TileHeight 256 /Quality 30 >> /JPEG2000ColorImageDict << /TileWidth 256 /TileHeight 256 /Quality 30 >> /AntiAliasGrayImages false /CropGrayImages true /GrayImageMinResolution 150 /GrayImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleGrayImages true /GrayImageDownsampleType /Bicubic /GrayImageResolution 300 /GrayImageDepth -1 /GrayImageMinDownsampleDepth 2 /GrayImageDownsampleThreshold 1.10000 /EncodeGrayImages true /GrayImageFilter /DCTEncode /AutoFilterGrayImages true /GrayImageAutoFilterStrategy /JPEG /GrayACSImageDict << /QFactor 0.15 /HSamples [1 1 1 1] /VSamples [1 1 1 1] >> /GrayImageDict << /QFactor 0.15 /HSamples [1 1 1 1] /VSamples [1 1 1 1] >> /JPEG2000GrayACSImageDict << /TileWidth 256 /TileHeight 256 /Quality 30 >> /JPEG2000GrayImageDict << /TileWidth 256 /TileHeight 256 /Quality 30 >> /AntiAliasMonoImages false /CropMonoImages true /MonoImageMinResolution 1200 /MonoImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleMonoImages true /MonoImageDownsampleType /Bicubic /MonoImageResolution 1200 /MonoImageDepth -1 /MonoImageDownsampleThreshold 1.08250 /EncodeMonoImages true /MonoImageFilter /CCITTFaxEncode /MonoImageDict << /K -1 >> /AllowPSXObjects false /CheckCompliance [ /None ] /PDFX1aCheck false /PDFX3Check false /PDFXCompliantPDFOnly false /PDFXNoTrimBoxError true /PDFXTrimBoxToMediaBoxOffset [ 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 ] /PDFXSetBleedBoxToMediaBox true /PDFXBleedBoxToTrimBoxOffset [ 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 ] /PDFXOutputIntentProfile (None) /PDFXOutputConditionIdentifier () /PDFXOutputCondition () /PDFXRegistryName (http://www.color.org) /PDFXTrapped /Unknown /CreateJDFFile false /SyntheticBoldness 1.000000 /Description << /ENU (Use these settings to create PDF documents with higher image resolution for high quality pre-press printing. The PDF documents can be opened with Acrobat and Reader 5.0 and later. These settings require font embedding.) /JPN /FRA /DEU /PTB /DAN /NLD /ESP /SUO /NOR /SVE /KOR /CHS /CHT /ITA >> >> setdistillerparams << /HWResolution [2400 2400] /PageSize [595.000 842.000] >> setpagedevice