id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentence	flesch	summary	cache	txt
app-746	Madad Ali Malik, Bushra; Noushad, Shamoon; Sheikh, Khansa; Rayyan, Ayesha; Riaz, Saman; Ansari, Basit	A Systematic Review: Manipulation vs. Mobilization for Mechanical Neck Pain	2025	38	.pdf	application/pdf	9218	367	41	Salom-Moreno, J. et al.19 (PEDro score=7), Cleland, J. A. et al.20 (PEDro score=7) and Dunning J.R. et al.11 (PEDro score=8) demonstrated that manipulation group showed statistically significant greater reduction in neck pain and disability, follow-ups ranging from immediately post-intervention (for neck pain p<0.001, between-group mean difference: 1.4; 95% confidence interval, 0.8-2.1)), 19 2-4 days on initial intervention and examination (reductions in disability p<0.001, between-group difference of 10% (95% confidence interval [CI]=5.3-14.7) and in pain p<.001, between- group difference of 2.0 (95% CI=1.4-2.7))20, and up to 48-hours after the initial examination (for disability p<0.001, between-group mean change (8.0 points [95% CI: 5.9, 10.2]) and for pain p<.001, between-group mean reduction (2.0 [95% CI: 1.5, 2.5]))11. But no significant improvement in CROM and pain between mobilization and manipulation group was found (For VAS p>0.05, mean difference (95% CI) –1.94 (–11.72– 7.84)).9 Loreto et al.2 (PEDro score=6) compared manipulation with mobilization and a control group of 36 patients.	cache/app-746.pdf	txt/app-746.txt