






































 

05-19                 Annals of Applied Psychophysiology December 2024 Volume 11                    

_______________________________________________________________________ 

A Cyberphysiologic Technique for Stress Control Through a 

YouTube Video Channel Useable Anytime, Anywhere 

Duke PhucDuc Do1 
Published online: December 2024 

© The Author(s) 2024 

Abstract 

Background: This research aimed to empower individuals to take charge of their daily stress. 

Unlike traditional stress relaxation sessions, which often involve prolonged in-person sessions 

over multiple appointments, the cyberphysiologic protocol of this research addressed challenges 

associated with coaching availability, client-coach interaction, and communication of healing 

objectives, often sources of uncertainty and ambiguity for the clients. While Cyberphysiology on 

YouTube is not currently available, the overwhelmingly positive feedback from the public on the 

relaxation video channels demonstrates its potential. Its practicality and convenience, particularly 

during periods of isolation like the COVID-19 pandemic, vacations, or remote work, make it a 

welcome relief in the often-burdensome process of stress management. This practicality can help 

individuals feel less overwhelmed by their stress.  

Methodology: In this research, the new protocol, cyberphysiology, used an objective stress 

measurement of the cortisol level in the hair of the two groups of subjects. The treatment group 

learned acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) concepts using mindful meditation self-

hypnosis. The control group engaged in traditional stress reduction exercise videos.  

Results: The Mann-Whitney U test from SPSS revealed a significant level of p value = 0.019. The 

results showed that practicing the cyberphysiologic (treatment) technique significantly improved 

stress levels compared to the common relaxation technique implemented in the videos for the 

control group.  

Conclusion: This research reveals another practical approach to stress management through the 

cyberphysiologic method, which integrates self-regulation techniques such as autogenic training, 

imagery/visualization, meditation, and self-hypnosis (Olness,1989). In addition, it includes 

teaching acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) principles via YouTube videos that can be 

accessed anytime, anywhere. 

Keywords: stress, cyberphysiology, self-regulation, autogenic training, imagery, visualization, 

mindfulness meditation, self-hypnosis, ACT, YouTube 

 

1. Duke Do   ddo@saybrook.edu 

Saybrook University, Pasadena, CA USA 

 

 

 



6 
 

Introduction 

 

This research was built upon a randomized controlled pilot study published in the 

International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis (IJCEH) in 2020 (Olendzki et al., 

2020). The study focused on the integration of hypnosis with mindfulness. Dr. Gary Elkins, a key 

researcher in this study, highlighted the potential of this combination for providing practical and 

user-friendly stress treatment. The unique approach aims to improve user experience and ensure 

effectiveness and accessibility in stress treatment, instilling confidence in its practicality. 

Additionally, this research explored the use of guided imagery, an essential component of 

traditional hypnosis, through the widely accessible platform YouTube. This research aimed to 

induce altered states of consciousness and maximize the benefits of mindful self-hypnosis. 

 

Mindfulness aims to promote non-judgmental present-moment awareness, which 

complements the techniques used in hypnosis to prepare individuals for suggestions of change. 

Positive results from Baylor University’s pilot study (Goodrich, 2020) demonstrated the potential 

of integrating mindfulness and hypnosis in stress treatment. This research seeks to explore the 

feasibility of self-hypnosis at home further using pre-recorded sessions on a YouTube channel. 

Participants can follow the instructions in the video to induce a relaxed and focused state, with the 

potential for self-regulation using readily available mobile devices. The practical implications of 

this research could significantly enhance stress treatment research. 

 

Methodology 

 

Theory 

 

This research was triggered by Sigmund Freud’s delineation of three levels of the mind: 

the conscious, preconscious, and unconscious. The conscious mind encompasses all awareness 

processes, the preconscious mind holds thoughts and feelings that are not currently within 

conscious awareness, and the unconscious mind is the primary reservoir of human behaviors 

influenced by past experiences (Freud, 1915). The unconscious mind, which operates beyond the 

individual’s conscious awareness, plays a significant role in shaping their behaviors and well-

being. It stores memories, emotions, and desires that are too painful or unacceptable to be 

consciously acknowledged, yet they influence the individual’s actions and feelings. Zeig (1980) 

stated, “The unconscious mind is made up of all your learnings over a lifetime, many of which you 

have completely forgotten, but which serve you in your automatic functioning. Now, a great deal 

of your behavior is the automatic functioning of these forgotten memories” (p. 66). This automatic 

functioning, which includes processes such as regulating bodily functions and responding to stress, 

operates without conscious attention, functioning at an unconscious level, regulated by the 

autonomic nervous system. However, Milton H. Erickson theorized that hypnosis is the tool for 

establishing communication with the unconscious mind and effecting behavioral change through 

reprogramming (as cited in Rossi, 2010). 

 

Mindfulness can be a powerful gateway to empowering people with a non-judgmental, 

accepting, and adaptable approach to thoughts, emotions, behaviors, and situations. Engaging in 

mindfulness practices effectively lowers muscle tension (Ganjeali et al., 2020). It reduces 

autonomic arousal, including symptoms such as increased heart rate and sweating. Hypnosis, in 



7 
 

turn, can harness the hypnotic trance state induced by mindfulness, utilizing heightened 

suggestibility, relaxation, and vivid imagination to reprogram our automatic functioning. This 

automatic functioning operates without conscious attention, functioning at an unconscious level, 

regulated by the autonomic nervous system, which governs numerous automatic bodily processes, 

including triggering the fight-or-flight response and managing stress and threats to restore 

equilibrium. 

 

With its focus on self-hypnosis explicitly tailored for stress reduction, cyberphysiologic 

techniques did not require the role of a professional in the field. However, the participant’s 

eagerness to learn was integral to its success. 

 

Method 

 

In this cyberphysiologic research, the protocol integrated multiple self-regulation 

techniques into a single self-taught playlist spanning six training sessions. These sessions 

incorporate the core principles of acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) and offer self-guided 

instruction through the user-friendly platform of the “Cyberphysiology” video communication 

channel on YouTube.  

 

The primary goal of this research study is to investigate the potential impact of YouTube-

based cyberphysiological interventions on stress reduction outcomes. To achieve this goal, this 

study was based on a quasi-experimental design. Subjects are assigned to groups based on non-

random criteria that rely on a researcher’s judgment, convenience, or specific characteristics of the 

selected individuals. However, like a true experiment, a quasi-experimental design seeks to 

establish a cause-and-effect relationship between an independent variable, cyberphysiologic 

technique, and a dependent variable, stress level. 

 

Participants 

 

From Alhaque et al. (2019) and Paleri et al. (2023)’s experiences, this experiment utilized 

the quasi-experiment, which compares two groups of volunteers using a YouTube channel. The 

experimental group included participants who received the intervention via Cyberphysiology 

videos on YouTube. Meanwhile, the control group did not receive the experimental techniques 

and watched the common relaxation videos, which were standard relaxation videos commonly 

available on YouTube and similar platforms. These videos were the same as their usual YouTube 

watching activities. This study evaluated the experimental and control groups’ stress levels before 

and after the experiment.  

 

Instruments 

 

The study required participants to have access to and knowledge about YouTube video 

channels before beginning the experiment. An initial remote session was conducted to explain the 

process, help with setup, and configure their devices for the study. Following this initial session, 

participants received detailed instructions and a designated point of contact to assist them during 

each session. The research compared two stress level measurements: the hair cortisol stress kit and 

the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS). Only the cortisol test was taken both before and after the 



8 
 

experiment, and the PSS scored did not show adequate results initially to continue collecting at the 

end. 

 

Results 

 

By means of giving an overview of the data collected for this study, the data in Table 1 

comprises the original 27 participants (Column A - Participant ID) who signed the consent form 

and agreed to submit the hair sample to the Advanced Food Intolerance Labs (AFIL) for stress test 

by cortisol level measurement. These participants were screened to meet adequate stress levels for 

the experiment and divided into treatment and control groups. The hair sample was analyzed using 

AFIL’s state-of-the-art biotechnology, which assesses cortisol in the body to help the experiment 

identify the subject’s stress levels. The stress level was recorded within range levels (0%–50%) 

and out of range (50%–100%). The baseline stress level is recorded based on these percent values 

in column J. 

 

Table 1 

Participants Summary 

  

 



9 
 

Legend: 

Color Meanings 

Red Participation excluded from the experiment due to the low stress level. 

Yellow Two experiment groups divider. 

Orange Participant status excluded from the experiment. 

Green Participant status participated with stress level improvement. 

Blue Participant status participated with stress level decline. 

 

In Table 2, the subjects only needed to submit the hair sample for the post-experiment 

stress level measurement indicated in column K. Column L shows the stress level differences with 

a positive value indicating improve and a negative value indicating decline, as indicated in column 

O for the initial assessment.  

 

Table 2 

Experiment Results 

 

 



10 
 

These data were subsequently prepared and analyzed using SPSS and online tools for 

statistical analysis. The experiment compared the stress level of 18 subjects’ stress scores before 

and after in two different groups: (1) cyberphysiology techniques as a treatment group and (2) 

relaxation as a control group. These scores presented the participant’s stress levels from 0 to 100; 

the high number showed high stress levels, and the low number showed low stress levels. The 

collected stress level data can be checked for normality to determine suitable statistical analysis 

methods.  

 

Sample Characteristics 

 

The null hypothesis for this normality test is that the data does not meet the normal 

distribution assumption. Reject the null hypothesis if the p-value is below 0.05. In a normal 

distribution, the mean, median, and mode should all be equal, or the skewness and kurtosis values 

should be as close to zero as possible, falling within the range of −1.96 to +1.96. Hence, not all the 

calculations indicated that the data from the Cyberphysiology group followed a normal distribution 

(see Table 3). 
 

Table 3 

Cyberphysiology Group Descriptive Normality Analysis From SPSS 

Statisticsa 

 Stress (Before) Stress (After) 

N Valid 9 9 

Missing 0 0 

Mean 61.6667 27.0000 

Median 66.0000 30.0000 

Mode 66.00b 18.00b 

a. Group = Cyberphysiology 

b. Multiple modes exist. The smallest value is shown 

 

The significant column under the Shapiro-Wilk test (last column in Table 4) indicates the 

significance of the normality test is larger than 0.05 and failed to reject the null hypothesis. This 

finding has significant implications for the stress levels in the Cyberphysiology group, as they 

were not distributed normally, which is a matter of concern (see Table 4). 

 

 
 

 



11 
 

 

Table 4 

Cyberphysiology Group Tests of Normality From SPSS 

 

As indicated in the rules for normal distribution above, not all the calculations indicated that the data from 

the Control group followed a normal distribution (see Table 5). 

 

Table 5 

Control Group Descriptive Analysis From SPSS 

Statisticsa 

 Stress (Before) Stress (After) 

N Valid 9 9 

Missing 0 0 

Mean 73.3333 71.0000 

Median 78.0000 72.0000 

Mode 69.00b 45.00b 

a. Group = Control 

b. Multiple modes exist. The smallest value is shown 

 

Similarly, the significant column under the Shapiro-Wilk test in Table 6 indicated the 

significance of the normality test is larger than 0.05 and failed to reject the null hypothesis. That 

means the subjects’ stress levels in the control group were not distributed normally. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



12 
 

Table 6 

Control Group Tests of Normality From SPSS 

 

In summary, this experiment analysis used non-parametric statistical tests for analysis 

because the collected data did not distribute normally and small samples size = 18. The calculation 

values presented in the subsequent tables from SPSS outputs and the statistical analysis utilized 

included: Mann-Whitney U test and The Wilcoxon signed-rank test. 
 

Mann-Whitney U Test (Compare the Treatments) 

 

The first analysis involved comparing the treatments and encompasses the null hypothesis 

(H0): there is no difference in stress reduction between the cyberphysiology (treatment) and 

relaxation (control) group. The question was, “Is there a difference in stress levels between 

individuals who practice cyberphysiology and those who do not?” 

The key findings of this analysis are as follows: 

(1) As the Hypothesis test summary (Table 7) clearly indicated, the significant level is p 

value = 0.019, which is less than α = 0.05. Therefore, the decision was confidently 

made to reject the null hypothesis, confirming that the stress change is indeed 

significantly different between the cyberphysiology (treatment) and the relaxation 

(control) group.  

(2) Furthermore, the table and chart (see Table 7) clearly showed a significant difference 

in the mean ranks of both groups. The cyberphysiology (treatment) group demonstrated 

a substantial improvement, standing out with a Mean Rank of 12.44 and a Sum of 112, 

compared to the relaxation (control) group with a Mean Rank of 6.56 and a Sum of 59, 

from the 9 test subjects in each group. 

(3) The effect size, a crucial measure in this analysis, is calculated using the formula: r = 

(Z / Sqrt (N) = −2.342/Sqrt (18) = −0.552. This value, larger than 0.5, indicated a 

significant effect. It provided a clear understanding of the magnitude of the difference 

between cyberphysiology and relaxation techniques, demonstrating a substantial effect 

size value. 

 

 



13 
 

 

 

Table 7 
Mann-Whitney U Test Results From SPSS 

 

Hypothesis Test Summary 

 Null Hypothesis Test Sig. Decision 

1 The distribution of Stress Change 

is the same across categories of 

Group. 

Independent-Samples Mann-

Whitney U Test 

.019a Reject the null 

hypothesis. 

Asymptotic significances are displayed. The significance level is .050. 



14 
 

a. Exact significance is displayed for this test. 

 

 

Test Statisticsa 

 
Stress 

Change 

Mann-

Whitney U 

14.000 

Wilcoxon W 59.000 

Z -2.342 

Asymp. Sig. 

(2-tailed) 

.019 

Exact Sig. 

[2*(1-tailed 

Sig.)] 

.019b 

a. Grouping Variable: 

Group 

b. Not corrected for 

ties. 

 

 

Ranks 

 

Group N 

Mean 

Rank 

Sum of 

Ranks 

Stress 

Change 

Cyberph

ysiology 

9 12.44 112.00 

Control 9 6.56 59.00 

Total 18   

 

 

Report 

Median 

Group 

Stress 

Change 

Cyberph

ysiology 

45.0000 

Control 6.0000 

Total 18.0000 
 

 



15 
 

 
 

A Mann-Whitney U test revealed that stress scores were statistically significantly lower in 

the cyberphysiology (treatment) group (Md = 45.0000, n = 9) compared to the relaxation (control) 

group (Md = 6.0000, n = 9), Z = −2.342, p value = 0.019, with a large effect size, r = 0.552. 

 

Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test (Compare the Effectiveness of Each Treatment) 

 

The second analysis, comparing the results within the group, covered the effectiveness of 

intervention with repeated measurement (before and after) of the same subjects within the 

cyberphysiology (treatment) and relaxation (control) groups. It answered these questions: (1) Did 

the cyberphysiologic technique reduce stress levels more effectively than the standard relaxation 

techniques? and (2) Was there a significant difference in stress levels before and after a 

cyberphysiologic intervention? Supporting evidence is provided in the following two sections for 

cyberphysiology (treatment) and relaxation (control) of the corresponding SPSS tables and figures. 

 

Cyberphysiology (Treatment) Group 

The experiment with the cyberphysiology (treatment) group compared the stress level of 

nine subjects’ stress scores before and after watching the six cyberphysiology videos to learn how 

to manage their daily stress (see Table 8).  
 



16 
 

Table 8 

Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test Results from SPSS for Cyberphysiology Group 
 

Hypothesis Test Summary 

 Null Hypothesis Test Sig. Decision 

1 The median of differences 

between Stress (Before) and 

Stress (After) equals 0. 

Related-Samples Wilcoxon 

Signed Rank Test 

.015 Reject the null 

hypothesis. 

Asymptotic significances are displayed. The significance level is .050. 

 

Statisticsa 

 Stress (Before) Stress (After) 

N Valid 9 9 

Missing 0 0 

Mean 61.6667 27.0000 

Median 66.0000 30.0000 

Mode 66.00b 18.00b 

a. Group = Cyberphysiology 

b. Multiple modes exist. The smallest value is shown 

 

Test Statisticsa,b 

 
Stress (After) - 

Stress (Before) 

Z -2.431c 

Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .015 

a. Group = Cyberphysiology 

b. Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test 

c. Based on positive ranks. 

 

A Wilcoxon signed-rank test revealed that stress scores were significantly lower after the 

Cyberphysiology intervention (Md = 27.0000, n = 9) compared to before (Md = 61.6667, n = 9), 

z = −2.431, p value = 0.015, with a large effect size, r = 0.810. 

 

Relaxation (Control) Group 

The experiment with the relaxation (control) group also compared the stress level of nine 

subjects’ stress scores before and after watching the six relaxation videos to manage their daily 

stress (see Table 9).  

 

 
 



17 
 

Table 9 

Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test Results from SPSS for Control Group 
 

Hypothesis Test Summary 

 Null Hypothesis Test Sig. Decision 

1 The median of differences 

between Stress (Before) and 

Stress (After) equals 0. 

Related-Samples Wilcoxon 

Signed Rank Test 

.766 Retain the 

null 

hypothesis. 

Asymptotic significances are displayed. The significance level is .050. 

 

Statisticsa 

 Stress (Before) Stress (After) 

N Valid 9 9 

Missing 0 0 

Mean 73.3333 71.0000 

Median 78.0000 72.0000 

Mode 69.00b 45.00b 

a. Group = Control 

b. Multiple modes exist. The smallest value is 

shown 

 

Test Statisticsa,b 

 

Stress (After) - 

Stress (Before) 

Z -.297c 

Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .766 

a. Group = Control 

b. Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test 

c. Based on positive ranks. 

 

 

A Wilcoxon signed rank test revealed that stress scores were not significantly lower after 

the control intervention (Md = 71.000, n = 9) compared to before (Md = 73.333, n = 9), z = 

−0.297, p value = 0.766, with a small effect size, r = 0.099. 

 

Discussion 

Findings 

 

This research aimed to measure stress levels and evaluate the effectiveness of stress 

reduction techniques. The results, including skewness and kurtosis, a Shapiro-Wilk’s test (p > .05), 

and a visual inspection of the histogram and normal Q-Q plots, revealed the stress levels recorded 



18 
 

were not normally distributed for both the cyberphysiology group and the control group, 

necessitating the use of nonparametric tests for a statistically significant analysis. Eighteen 

randomly sampled subjects (dots in Figure 1) were asked to watch a YouTube channel for stress 

reduction. The channel featured both cyberphysiology (treatment) and relaxation (control) 

techniques. The dots in Figure 1 vividly illustrate the effectiveness of these techniques, with a 

positive number indicating an improvement in stress levels and negative values showing the 

opposite result. 

 

Figure 1 

Stress Level Change by Group 

 

The results showed that practicing the cyberphysiology (treatment) technique significantly 

improved the stress level compared to the common relaxation technique implemented in the videos 

for the control group, highlighting the importance of these findings. The results also showed that 

the common relaxation intervention did not significantly influence participants’ stress levels in 

this experiment, further emphasizing the superiority of cyberphysiology in stress management. 

 

Limitations 

The findings are indeed remarkable, but it is crucial to acknowledge the following 

constraints and potential sources of bias that may have influenced the results. For instance, even 

though the sample size of 18 is acceptable for this experiment, there may be more accurate 

representations of the population. Especially in neuroscience, small sample sizes can also lead to 

low statistical power, inflated false discovery rates, and low reproducibility. The samples are 

primarily female and only cover a small area of the country, which could potentially impact the 

generalizability of the results and underline the need for further research. 

 

 

 



19 
 

Future Directions 

The limitations outlined in this study offer valuable insights for future research. By directly 

addressing these limitations, subsequent studies could provide a comprehensive and critical 

evaluation of the study’s validity and reliability. Expanding on the findings and constraints 

discussed, future research could explore the potential of cyberphysiology in managing various 

mental health conditions, including chronic anxiety, depression, and sleep disorders. Additionally, 

investigating the integration of biofeedback and neurofeedback techniques could optimize the 

effectiveness of the cyberphysiologic approach. Moreover, future studies involving a more 

extensive and diverse pool of research participants can help address the limitations highlighted in 

this study. 

 

Intervention Evaluation 

This study successfully introduced a stress management technique aimed at helping 

individuals align their actions with their core values through self-regulation of their minds to 

overcome stress feelings. The two concepts at hand are: (1) meditation, which is deeply rooted in 

ancient traditions and centers around mindfulness and present-moment awareness; and (2) ACT, a 

modern therapeutic approach that emphasizes acceptance, cognitive defusion, and commitment to 

values-based actions (Gloster et al., 2020). By incorporating mindfulness, acceptance, and values-

based actions, it becomes possible to enhance psychological flexibility, reduce stress and anxiety, 

and cultivate a more meaningful and fulfilling life. However, this combined approach also brings 

about challenges, such as the intricacy of integration, time commitment, potential resistance, 

individual differences, and measurement of outcomes. 

 

Conclusion 

Stress is a widespread issue that impacts individuals in various aspects of their lives, 

including work, education, and personal relationships. While traditional stress management 

methods like cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) and mindfulness are effective, they often 

demand significant time and dedication. A new approach called mindful hypnosis, which combines 

mindfulness and hypnosis, has recently gained attention as a promising stress management 

technique. According to a pilot study conducted by Baylor University, this intervention has shown 

promise (Goodrich, 2020). Additionally, this research reveals another effective approach for stress 

management through the cyberphysiologic method, which integrates self-regulation techniques 

such as autogenic training, imagery/visualization, meditation, and self-hypnosis (Olness,1989). In 

addition, it includes teaching acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) principles via YouTube 

videos that people can access anytime, anywhere.  



20 
 

References 

1. Alhaque, A., Joefiani, P., & Wungu, E. (2019). Trial application of acceptance and 

commitment therapy principles to reduce the degree of stress experienced by adolescents 

with down syndrome sibling(s). Psychological Research and Intervention, 2(1), 1–10. 

https://doi.org/10.21831/PRI.V2I1.24339 

2. Elkins, G. R., Roberts, R. L., & Simicich, L. (2018). Mindful self-hypnosis for self-care: 

An integrative model and illustrative case example. The American Journal of Clinical 

Hypnosis, 61(1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/00029157.2018.1456896  

3. Freud, S. (1915). The unconscious (Standard ed., Vol. 14, pp. 159–204). Hogarth. 

4. Ganjeali, S., Farsi, Z., Sajadi, S. A., & Zarea, K. (2022). The effect of the demonstration-

based progressive muscle relaxation technique on stress and anxiety in nurses caring for 

COVID-19 patients: A randomized clinical trial. BMC Psychiatry, 22, Article 791. 

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-04456-3  

5. Gloster, A. T., Walder, N., Levin, M. E., Twohig, M. P., & Karekla, M. (2020). The 

empirical status of acceptance and commitment therapy: A review of meta-

analyses. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 18, 181–

192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2020.09.009 

6. Goodrich, T. (2020, June 15). Mindfulness combined with hypnotherapy aids highly 

stressed people, Baylor University pilot study finds. Baylor University Media and Public 

Relations. 

https://baylor.edu/mediacommunications/news.php?action=story&story=219258 

7. Olendzki, N., Elkins, G. R., Slonena, E., Hung, J., & Rhodes, J. R. (2020). Mindful 

hypnotherapy to reduce stress and increase mindfulness: A randomized controlled pilot 

study. The International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 68(2), 151–166. 

https://doi.org/10.1080/00207144.2020.1722028 

8. Olness, K. (1989). Hypnotherapy: A cyberphysiologic strategy in pain 

management. Pediatric Clinics of North America, 36(4), 873–884. 

https://doi.org/10.1016/s0031-3955(16)36726-8 

9. Paleri, R. J., Meena, K. S. M., Sharma, M. K., Ravish, H., Krishnamurthy, L., Joshi, R. K., 

& Lepcha, R. (2023). Efficacy of video-based relaxation technique to minimize stress in 

young adults during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Neurosciences in Rural Practice, 

14(3), 544–546. https://doi.org/10.25259/JNRP_68_2023 

10. Rossi, E. (2010). The collected works of Milton H. Erickson, Vol 5. Classical hypnotic 

phenomena, part 1: Psychodynamics (E. L. Rossi, K. L. Rossi, & R. Erickson-Klein, Eds.). 

The Milton H. Erickson Foundation Press. 

11. Sim, S., Maldonado, I. L., Castelnau, P., Barantin, L., El-Hage, W., Andersson, F., & 

Cottier, J. P. (2024). Neural correlates of mindfulness meditation and hypnosis on magnetic 

resonance imaging: Similarities and differences. A scoping review. Journal of 

Neuroradiology, 51(2), 131–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurad.2023.11.002 

12. Zeig, J. (1980). A teaching seminar with Milton Erickson. Brunner-Mazel. 

https://doi.org/10.21831/PRI.V2I1.24339
https://doi.org/10.1080/00029157.2018.1456896
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-04456-3
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2020.09.009
https://baylor.edu/mediacommunications/news.php?action=story&story=219258
https://doi.org/10.1080/00207144.2020.1722028
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0031-3955(16)36726-8
https://doi.org/10.25259/JNRP_68_2023
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurad.2023.11.002

