25 APP| Published By AEIRC| https://doi.org/10.29052/2412-3188.v7.i1.2020.25-30 Ann. psychophysiol. ISSN 2412-3188 (Online) | 2410-1354 (Print) Original Article Relationship of functional dyspepsia with mental and physical stress Prem Shankar, Nikeeta Mandhan, Syed Muhammad Hussain Zaidi, Muhammad Saad Choudhry & Akshay Kumar Dow Medical College, Dow University of Health Sciences (DUHS), Karachi-Pakistan. Abstract Background: Functional Dyspepsia is a globally prevalent illness, which although not life-threatening, displays a strong influence on the quality of life. Functional Dyspepsia is essentially chronic indigestion with no obvious physical cause. The objective of this study was to evaluate the frequency of functional dyspepsia and its association with mental and physical stress. It could have the same significant association as Irritable Bowel Syndrome has with stress. Methodology: The data were collected from 221 students from 3 medical colleges of Karachi, Pakistan. Subjects were asked to fill out questionnaires concerning demographics, lifestyle, and dietary habits. Rome III criteria was employed to identify functional dyspepsia and sub-sections of the Sadaf Stress Scale (SSS) was used to measure mental and physical stress. Results: Out of the 221 subjects majority were females (67.4%) with a mean age of 21.47 years. 34.8% of subjects were diagnosed to have functional dyspepsia, out of which around three quarters were females (68.5%). A moderate positive correlation was observed between functional dyspepsia and mental and physical stress. Conclusion: It is concluded from the study results that there is a high frequency of functional dyspepsia among individuals with mental and physical stress or functional dyspepsia might cause the stress. Keywords Functional Dyspepsia, Physical Stress, Mental Stress, Sadaf Stress Scale (SSS), Rome III Criteria. Citation: Shankar P, Mandhan N, Zaidi SMH, Choudhry MH & Kumar A. APP. 2020; 7(1):25-30 Corresponding Author Email: mohdzaidi06@hotmail.com DOI: 10.29052/2412-3188.v7.i1.2020.25-30 Received 16/02/2020 Accepted 02/09/2020 Published 01/10/2020 Copyright © The Author(s). 2020 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Funding: The author(s) received no specific funding for this work. Conflicts of Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) 26 APP| Published By AEIRC| Volume 7 Issue 1 ISSN 2412-3188 (Online) | 2410-1354 (Print) Introduction Functional Dyspepsia is a common gastrointestinal disorder characterized by chronic indigestion with no obvious physical cause1. It is usually referred to as a diagnosis of exclusion, which is made when all required investigations reveal no identifiable etiology1. The condition is multifactorial and therefore the etiological factors are diverse. Globally, the prevalence lies in between 11.3% age ≥ 60 years compared to 9.9% with patients aged below 60, whereas in Asian regions the reported frequency is in between 8% to 23%2,3. The prevalence among medical students is unknown. Pathophysiological abnormalities accompanying the condition include accelerated gastric emptying, impaired gastric accommodation, gastric or duodenal hypersensitivity to distension, and nutrients4. Literature confirms that stress affects the gut- brain communication, and induces pain, bloating and other gastrointestinal problems4,5. Stress either be physical or mental greatly influences the gut bacteria which in turn alters the mood, emotion and behaviour. Therefore, there is a direct impact of brain and gut activity over one another5. A study indicated that personality patterns including depression, anxiety and stress altered the individual’s gastrointestinal tract activity6. Significant exposure to stress increases the risk of gastrointestinal tract diseases7. It is proposed that the mood alterations are associated with Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) and functional dyspepsia6. Moreover, the young population is more likely to develop such gastric conditions as the current educational model imposes inadvertently opposing effects on the mental health of the learners and due to high frequency of depression and anxiety, they have increased susceptibility for disorders such as functional dyspepsia8. Although it is believed that a little stress makes a positive impact and always makes the immune system stronger. Individuals with moderate physical stress usually have improved cardiac health and their immune system performs better against infections. In addition, the progress after surgical procedures is also faster among individuals undergoing modest levels of stress9. It is said that physical stress is necessary for survival but within the optimal range. As chronic physical stress weakens the immune system and causes hypertension, anxiety, depression, fatigue, gastrointestinal, and cardiac difficulties9. Mental stress affects parts of the brain involved in memories, perception, thoughts and decision-making processes. Moderate stressful events enable the brain to perform better. But continuous academic stress and/or work stress involving increased cognitive functioning leads to psycho-somatic abnormalities which in turn affects the gastrointestinal system and function9. The Rome III criteria is frequently employed to establish the diagnosis of functional dyspepsia and other gastrointestinal disorders which includes postprandial fullness, early satiety, pain and burning sensation in epigastrium providing negative status on the required investigation including an upper GI endoscopy, with the onset of at least six months and the duration of at least three months10. A stress evaluation concept and specific stress evaluating tool for the local Pakistani population, Sadaf Stress Scale (SSS) has been developed and widely used for the evaluation of seven different types of stresses specifically among the Pakistani people11. The scale is divided into seven subcategories comprising of 114 items entitled physical, mental, psychosocial, traumatic, nutritional, emotional, and chemical stress. Preliminary data collected showed high variability and predictability. Cronbach reality test obtained a value between 0.945 and 0.916. Revises SSS use 95 items, employing Spearmen brown coefficient analysis with significant coefficient levels9. Although dyspepsia is not a life-threatening entity, it certainly has dreadful effects on the patient’s quality of life12. It is one of the 27 APP| Published By AEIRC| Volume 7 Issue 1 ISSN 2412-3188 (Online) | 2410-1354 (Print) diseases having a significant medical, economic, social, and political impact on the society. In Pakistan, information about epidemiology and risk factors for functional dyspepsia and related disorders specifically among university or medical students is scarce. The objective of the present study was to determine the frequency of functional dyspepsia and its association with mental and physical stress among medical students of Pakistan. Methodology A survey based study was conducted at 3 medical colleges (Karachi medical & dental college, Sindh Medical College, and Dow Medical College) of Karachi, Pakistan. We approached a total number of 240 medical students out of which 221 volunteered to participate in the study. Prior Informed consent was obtained from all subjects. Study participants were asked to fill a structured questionnaire comprising of demographics, lifestyle, and food intake information. Rome III criteria were used to identify functional dyspepsia10 and to measure the physical and mental stress, sub-section of Sadaf stress scale (SSS) was used11, this Likert scale consists of 5-point scale ranging 1 to 5 i.e., Never, Rarely, Sometimes, very often, always and the response scores were calculated and categorized into the level of stress i.e., Normal, Mild, Moderate, and Severe. Data analysis was performed using the SPSS version 22.0. The frequency was calculated for functional dyspepsia. Correlation with stress variables and gender differences were determined using Spearman’s rho and Mann Whitney U test, respectively. We also calculated the Mean rank for functional dyspepsia and physical and mental stress with the Kruskal Wallis H test. The p-values ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Result The data from 221 medical students was analyzed, of them, the majority were females (67.4%). The mean age of the sample population was 21.47 years. A total of 34.8% of subjects were diagnosed to have functional dyspepsia, out of which around three quarters were females (68.5%). A strong positive correlation was observed among functional dyspepsia and both mental (r=0.411; p=0.001) and physical stress (r=0.475; p=0.001) (Table 3). The difference in symptoms of dyspepsia was statistically insignificant between both genders (p- value=0.69). Table 1: Demonstrates the gender-based differences in the relative frequency of functional dyspepsia in the study population Variable Gender n(%) p-value Male (n=72) Female (n=149) Frequency of dyspepsia 25(32.4) 52(68.5) 0.69 *p-value<0.05 is considered significant As per the results obtained from Rome III Criteria, functional dyspepsia was more frequent among the 3rd year (32.4%) and 5th year (22%) medical students. Concerning physical and mental stress, the results were comparable in all years but it was observed that the 1st year students had relatively maximum physical and mental stress. Table 2: Demonstrates the yearly distribution of the sample population with reference to the frequency of dyspepsia and stress (mental & physical) 28 APP| Published By AEIRC| Volume 7 Issue 1 ISSN 2412-3188 (Online) | 2410-1354 (Print) Years Total n(%) Rome III Criteria (n) Dyspepsia n(%) SSS (Mean Ranks) Heartburn Epigastric Pain Abdominal Fullness Early Satiety Mental Stress Physical Stress 1st 31(14) 12 13 13 13 13(16.9) 136 140 2nd 26(11.8) 11 11 11 11 11(14.3) 111.5 130.8 3rd 75(33.9) 25 24 25 25 25(32.4) 106.6 98.8 4th 31(14) 11 11 12 11 11(14.3) 118.5 125.1 5th 58(26.2) 17 17 17 17 17(22) 97.6 93.3 Table 3 shows the correlation of physical and mental stress with functional dyspepsia, it was found to be significantly correlating with mental and physical stress among the studied population (p- value=0.001). Table 3: Correlation of functional dyspepsia with mental and physical stress. Variables Co-relation coefficient p-value Dyspepsia Mental Stress 0.411 0.001* Physical Stress 0.475 0.001* *p-value < 0.05 is considered significant Discussion Stress was determined as a positive risk factor for the development of functional dyspepsia among the local medical students, which is also supported by several previous studies13-16. The regular diagnostic rate of functional dyspepsia among the Pakistani population ranges between 11 to 15%, as reported by local physicians17. In our study population, the frequency of functional dyspepsia was found to be 34.8%. In comparison, an Indian study reported a lesser frequency than our estimated figure despite having similar demographics and lifestyle factors2. This inflated rate might be due to higher (moderate and severe) physical and mental stress in our study population. In support several studies confirmed the bi- directionality of the brain-gut pathway i.e. stress has detrimental effects on the quality of life of an individual, influencing mood, emotions and gut activity and hence leads to functional gastrointestinal disorders18,19. A higher frequency of functional dyspepsia is observed among individuals enduring high occupational stress, intense physical activity and those involved in cognitive activities, specifically students20,21. Other than stress, several other lifestyle factors including tobacco smoking, alcohol consumption and junk food consumption, etc. increase the likelihood of development of functional dyspepsia2,22,23. Although alcohol consumption is yet not common locally but smoking and junk food consumption remain at the forefront of doing the damage to the normal gut activity in addition to stress. Increased consumption of junk and fried food was found among the enrolled study participants with a high frequency of functional dyspepsia. People suffering from functional dyspepsia exhibit a greater rate of absence from work, reduction in productivity, and higher dependence on healthcare resources compared to general population24. For students, the symptoms associated with functional dyspepsia may cause a significant impact on the study habits, concentration span, class attendance, and test performance. 29 APP| Published By AEIRC| Volume 7 Issue 1 ISSN 2412-3188 (Online) | 2410-1354 (Print) To the best of our knowledge, none of the Pakistani universities currently have a students’ health counselling program particularly related to the students’ mental and psychological health. Campus-wide health seminars/workshops discussing and highlighting symptoms as well as management of stress-induced psychological and physical impairment, e.g. functional gastrointestinal disorders, can lead to a reduction in the overall prevalence of these disorders. Besides, one of the major limitations of the study was the unavailability of the Stool Antigen test for Helicobacter Pylori infection and upper GI Endoscopy, which should have been done as a screening protocol. Conclusion In conclusion, our findings indicated an alarming frequency of functional dyspepsia among medical students and its strong correlation with mental and physical stress. In order to devise better management of functional dyspepsia and to minimize the chronic depletion of resources, further large- scale extensive studies investigating the gut- brain communication among the subjects with functional dyspepsia must be carried out involving the local population. Acknowledgment The authors would like to acknowledge Momina Qureshi and Masharib Bashar for their support during the study conduction. References 1. Oustamanolakis P, Tack J. Dyspepsia: organic versus functional. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2012; 46(3): 175-190. 2. Basandra S, Bajaj D. Epidemiology of Dyspepsia and Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) in Medical Students of Northern India. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8(12): JC13- JC16.18. 3. Egloff N, Beer C, Gschossmann JM, Sendensky AH, von Känel R. Pathogenesis of functional gastrointestinal disorders – an interdisciplinary Perspective. Praxis (Bern 1994) 2010; 99: 419-427. 4. Camilleri M, Functional Dyspepsia and Gastroparesis. Dig Dis 2016; 34:491-499. 5. American Psychological Association. Stress Effects on the Body. Available at: https://www.apa.org/helpcenter/stress /effects-gastrointestinal 6. Huerta-Franco M-R, Vargas-Luna M, Tienda P, Delgadillo-Holtfort I, Balleza- Ordaz M, Flores-Hernandez C. Effects of occupational stress on the gastrointestinal tract. World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol. 2013; 4:108–118. 7. Konturek PC, Brzozowski T, Konturek SJ. Stress and the gut: pathophysiology, clinical consequences, diagnostic approach and treatment options. J Physiol Pharmacol. 2011; 62:591–599. 8. Altaf M, F.Altaf K, Zahid S, Sharf R, Inayat A, Owais M, Usmani H. Medical students bearing mental stress due to their academic schedule. IJEHSR. 2013;1(2):93- 97. 9. Ahmed S & Noushad S. Psychophysiology of Stress. Pakistan: Advance Educational Institute & Research Centre. 2014: 1-147. 10. Drossman DA, Corazziari E, Delvaux M, Spiller RC, Talley NJ, Thompson WG, Whitehead WE. Rome III: The Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders, Degnon Associates. Inc., McLean, VA. 2006:1-29. 11. Noushad S, Ahmed S. Novel stress evaluating tool; Sadaf Stress Scale (sss), tested so far on Pakistani population. IJEHSR. 2013;1(2):57-61. 12. Lee SW, Lee TY, Lien HC, Yeh HZ, Chang CS, Ko CW. The risk factors and quality of life in patients with overlapping functional dyspepsia or peptic ulcer disease with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Gut and liver. 2014; 8(2):160-164. 13. Mak AD, Wu JC, Chan Y, Chan FK, Sung JJ, Lee S. Dyspepsia is strongly associated 30 APP| Published By AEIRC| Volume 7 Issue 1 ISSN 2412-3188 (Online) | 2410-1354 (Print) with major depression and generalised anxiety disorder‐a community study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2012; 36(8):800- 810. 14. Devanarayana NM, Mettananda S, Liyanarachchi C, Nanayakkara N, Mendis N, Perera N, Rajindrajith S. Abdominal pain–predominant functional gastrointestinal diseases in children and adolescents: prevalence, symptomatology, and association with emotional stress. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2011; 53(6): 659-665. 15. Vanuytsel T, van Wanrooy S, Vanheel H, Vanormelingen C, Verschueren S, Houben E, Rasoel SS, Tόth J, Holvoet L, Farré R, Van Oudenhove L. Psychological stress and corticotropin-releasing hormone increase intestinal permeability in humans by a mast cell-dependent mechanism. Gut. 2014; 63(8):1293-1299. 16. De la Roca-Chiapas JM, Solís-Ortiz S, Fajardo-Araujo M, Sosa M, Córdova- Fraga T, Rosa-Zarate A. Stress profile, coping style, anxiety, depression, and gastric emptying as predictors of functional dyspepsia: a case-control study. J Psychosom Res. 2010; 68(1): 73-81. 17. Azam Z. Functional GI disorders include Functional Dyspepsia and Irritable Bowel Syndrome [Internet]. Karachi (Pakistan): Pulse International; [Updated 2015 May]. Available at: http://www.pulsepakistan.com/index.php/ main-news-july-1-15/1237-functional-gi- disorders-include-functional-dyspepsia-and- irritable-bowel-syndrome-dr-zahid-azam 18. Drossman DA, Li Z, Andruzzi E, Temple RD, Talley NJ, Thompson WG, Whitehead WE, Janssens J, Funch-Jensen P, Corazziari E, Richter JE. US householder survey of functional gastrointestinal disorders. Dig Dis Sci. 1993; 38(9): 1569– 1580. 19. El‐Serag HB, Olden K, Bjorkman D. Health‐related quality of life among persons with irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic review.Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2002; 16(6): 1171–1185. 20. Huerta-Franco MR, Vargas-Luna M, Tienda P, Delgadillo-Holtfort I, Balleza- Ordaz M, Flores-Hernandez C. Effects of occupational stress on the gastrointestinal tract. World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol. 2013; 4(4):108-118. 21. Ganasegeran K, Al-Dubai SA, Qureshi AM, Al-abed AA, Am R, Aljunid SM. Social and psychological factors affecting eating habits among university students in a Malaysian medical school: A cross- sectional study. Nutr J. 2012; 11: Article 48. 22. Shaib Y, El-Serag HB. The prevalence and risk factors of functional dyspepsia in a multiethnic population in the United States. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2004; 99: 2210-2216. 23. Tougas G, Chen Y, Hwang P, Liu MM, Eggleston A. Prevalence and impact of upper gastrointestinal symptoms in the Canadian population: findings from the DIGEST study. Domestic/International Gastroenterology Surveillance Study. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 1999; 94: 2845-2854. 24. Moayyedi P, Mason J. Clinical and economic consequences of dyspepsia in the community. Gut. 2002; 50 (suppl 4): iv10-2.