





































 1 

 

CLEMENT, TANYA ELIZABETH, 2024. Dissonant Records: Close Listening to Literary 

Archives, 1st ed., Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press., ISBN 0-262-37922-8 

 

In Dissonant Records: Close Listening to Literary Archives, Tanya E. Clement argues that spoken 

word audio recordings are underrepresented in archival institutions and neglected in literary 

scholarship. It is evident that there is an overabundance of textual records in libraries and archives 

– a preference of archivists and scholars which trickles down into the discursive spaces of 

scholarship and the public imaginary (xi). In her book, Clement engages with ‘silence,’ both the 

literal pauses in sound recordings which constitute “active absences” that can be rich with 

meaning, and the ‘silencing’ power of the archive that denies alternative forms of knowledge 

production (xiii, 7).  

 

Clement succinctly presents why there is a scarcity of sound recordings in literary archival 

institutions and a general apathy for audio archives amongst scholars (12-13). This disparity can 

be explained by economic and social realities (e.g., the fragility of media types, limited resources 

for digitization, the privacy concerns of their subjects, inconsistent metadata, the lack of playback 

machines in reading rooms, etc.). The lack of engagement with sound recordings in literary 

scholarship is not only a detriment to historical inquiry, but a hindrance to our critical engagement 

with the past through new paths of interpretation, including the ‘close listening’ methodology for 

which the book is advocating.    

 

What sets this book apart from other work on audio-visual archives is Clement’s focus on the 

“hermeneutics of media,” particularly the use of resonance as an engine of meaning-making (3). 

Her hermeneutic approach requires a consideration of the dialogical nature of the recording, 

between the recorder and recorded and the compression of the past recording and the present 



 2 

researcher, as well as the audio-materiality of sound media, such as grain, distortion, and 

amplification. (8). Clement also examines the entelechy of audio records that capture traces of 

multiple voices, silences, and liminal sounds, allowing for fluid and diverse interpretation and 

meaning making within the archival interaction (9-10).  

 

The counter-term to resonance is ‘dissonance,’ the concept which provides the book’s title. 

Clement draws our attention to the unwieldy nature of audio recording as a medium with technical 

limitations in both recording and playback. The “messiness” of sound recordings, defined by 

various technical issues such as amplification, interference, distortion, and compression, are the 

‘dissonant’ noises which grounds Clement’s analysis. Clement explores these concepts with five 

case studies, each comprising a chapter of the book.  

 

In Chapter 1, the author ‘close listens’ to oral histories of survivors of the 1921 Tulsa Race 

Massacre, recorded fifty years after the event by Ruth Sigler Avery, a White, Tulsan woman who 

herself was present at the event as a young child. In the oral history recordings, Clement pays 

attention to non-verbal paratextual moments (silence, laughter, and tone) which complicate and 

subvert Ruth’s conversations with her subjects. For example, laughter plays a significant role in 

the oral history testimony. In the testimony of a Black female participant, her laughter signals the 

warm and friendly relationship between interviewer and subject. With the white male participants, 

laughter signals moments of discomfort, including when one subject recalls overhearing a Black 

woman being asked for her husband’s name by an on-duty member of the American Legion and 

that her reply was that she did not know it. The subject takes the statement at face-value and laughs 

at the woman, taking her to be ignorant. Meanwhile, the modern reader interprets the comment as 

a purposeful evasion intended to secure her family’s safety. (32).  

 

In Chapter 2, Clement compares recordings of Zora Neale Hurston’s ethnographic study of Black 

communities in the American South with similar recordings created by the Work Projects 

Administration in the 1930s. She focuses on distortions and inaudibility created by the technical 

limitations of the original recording and subsequent digitization. Chapter 3 focuses on recordings 

made of Ralph Ellison during the 1953 Harvard Summer School Conference on the Contemporary 

Novel. She listens for what Ellison does not say during his lecture to a mostly white audience, 



 3 

particularly about race and the burgeoning tensions of the civil rights movement (73-75). These 

silences are “interferences” that make “resonant the unknown, the unseen, and the unheard” (70).  

 

It is surprising that the psychoanalytic elements of ‘close listening’ are not made explicit in the 

book. Her concept of ‘resonance’ is defined as the researcher’s awareness of their own reactions 

and feelings within the interviewer-subject relationship. She traces the concept to Margaret Mead’s 

1949 conference paper “Possible Mechanism of Recall and Recognition,” and not further back to 

Sigmund Freud’s theory of countertransference, of which Mead was assuredly aware (Howard, 

360). It is possible that the ‘close listening’ methodology would benefit from a deeper engagement 

with psychoanalytic concepts, or at least the recognition that it already resembles aspects of 

Freudian theory. To draw a comparison to a concept articulated by Otto Kernberg, “psychoanalytic 

listening” includes listening for what is unwittingly communicated by the unconscious, listening 

to one’s own emotional response to what is being communicated, and allowing for a multiplicity 

of meaning within communication (Kernberg, 193). Had her study drawn upon these 

psychoanalytic concepts, it may have garnered a deeper understanding of the interiority of her 

subjects. For example, Ellison’s “resonant silences” during a speech to a primarily white audience 

may have also reflected what Frantz Fanon describes as “a collapse of the ego [wherein] the Black 

man stops behaving as an actional person” and acts only in “reaction” to white society, or ‘the 

Other’ (Fanon, 132). If the purpose of ‘close listening’ is to look past the surface-level content of 

communication and gain insight into the interiority of the historical subject, captured and preserved 

outside of time by the recording, it would achieve its goals better by using the tools of 

psychoanalytic inquiry.  

 

The last two chapters focus on a more unusual set of recordings not typical in literary studies: 

personal therapy sessions recorded by the poet Anne Sexton; and recordings of Tarot-readings by 

the queer feminist scholar Gloria Anzaldúa. The recordings capture expressions of contested 

identity. In Sexton’s case, Clement describes how an exploration of one’s “true self” in the 

therapeutic context leads to a determination that the self is always mediated; and for Anzaldúa, 

listening to her own non-verbal reactions to the Tarot readings allows her to discover her spiritual 

identity (91, 111). Both Sexton and Anzaldúa interact with their recordings and subsequently 

record their reactions, creating a dialogical process between creator and creation, complicated by 



 4 

the presence of the archival researcher in the present and future. Although these stories are very 

compelling and make the case for her overall argument, I wonder how relevant these case studies 

might be for future scholarship given the atypical circumstances of the recordings. Due to the 

privacy issues inherent in recordings such as therapy tapes, which are legally protected personal 

health information, it is unlikely that similar sets of audio records exist in public archives. 

Therefore, these case studies arguably lack demonstrative value for future research.  

 

While the book’s case studies are insightful and make an argument for the potential benefit of her 

methodology, it is limited by the selectiveness of its analysis spread across mostly unrelated 

literary and historical events. A book-length study of any one of these case studies would better 

showcase the benefits of ‘close listening.’ For example, what might a cross-sectional study of the 

oral history of the Tulsa Race Massacre reveal about that event’s perpetrators, victims, and 

witnesses? Or how would a comparison of Ellison’s 1956 speech and his later speeches given 

under different circumstances illuminate our understanding of his interior life across time? 

Dissonant Records is perhaps best appreciated as a form of advocacy for the epistemological 

potential of the hermeneutics of media. That full potential – and the potential of transformative 

and critical engagement with sound recordings in literary study and beyond – has yet to be realized.  

 

Works cited 

Fanon, Frantz. 2008. Black Skin, White Masks. New York: Grove Press.  

Howard, Jane. 1984. Margaret Mead, a Life. New York: Simon and Schuster. 

Kernberg, Otto F. 2008. Contemporary Controversies: In Psychoanalytic Theory, Techniques, 

and Their Applications. New Haven, CT : Yale University Press.  

 

Christopher A. Long (CAL) is the archivist of the University of Toronto Mississauga Library. 

He is a graduate of York University (HBA ’13, MA ’16) and the University of Toronto (MI ’18). 

His research interests include oral history, audiovisual archives, and the intersection of 

biography, life-writing, and archival work.  

 



 5 

 

 

© 2024 Christopher A. Long 


