


































 

Two Perspectives on Decolonizing Ethnography

Review by Hussein Masimbi and Paula Uimonen

Carolina Alonso Bejarano, Lucia Lopez Juarez, Mirian A. Mijangos Garcia, and Daniel M. 

Goldstein. Decolonizing ethnography: undocumented immigrants and new directions in social 

science. Durham, NC, Duke University Press. 2019, xiii + 183pp, ISBN 1478003626.

Let us start with a perspective that takes careful note of the words “dominant anthropology—like 

all academic disciplines—remains part of a larger colonial project” to underline “the inscription 

of coloniality in anthropology’s DNA” (19). Responding to such statements, some readers may 

mumble something about flogging dead horses, or smirk at yet another passing trend in 

anthropology, and possibly stop reading any further. Yet there is something to be said for a 

growing number of voices calling for the decolonization of the discipline, urging for new ways 

of doing anthropology. At the prestigious American Anthropological Association (AAA) 

conference in Vancouver in 2019, decolonization had as many as 44 entries in the conference 

program index, more than any other keyword, and one of the fifteen executive sessions was 

entitled Decolonial Methods: Changing Anthropological Climates Through Methodological 

Disruptions. It seems high time to take the inscription of coloniality in dominant anthropology 

seriously and explore alternatives. 

The co-authored book Decolonizing Ethnography aims to “offer a guide for those wishing to 

expand the potential of ethnography to serve as a means for social transformation and 

decolonization,” as stated on the back cover. Decolonizing ethnography is of course a tall task, 



which the authors address succinctly, not only in theory, but also in practice. The authors situate 

their work in the epistemic trajectory of decolonial feminist theory, foregrounding alternative 

anthropologies such as feminist anthropology, collaborative ethnography, world anthropology 

and activist anthropology. Their critical overview of the discipline’s history and alternatives to 

dominant anthropology provides a solid introduction to decoloniality, which is not to be confused 

with postcolonialism, while their own research project offers insights into how decolonial 

ethnography can work in practice. Although their project focused on undocumented immigrants 

in the United States, their approach is applicable to many other research topics and research 

contexts, emphasising techniques of collaborative and participatory research. 

The authors argue convincingly that decolonizing ethnography is about working with and for 

people, from collective research design and active involvement of interlocutors as research 

collaborators to recognizing the subjects of anthropological research as knowledge producers and 

theory builders in their own right. This is a far cry from the extractive anthropology that relies on 

theory from the global North and data from the global South for career building in elite academic 

environments, with little or no benefit to the people cast as objects rather than subjects.  

From another perspective, anthropology being a study based on people and their culture uses 

different approaches, and has a good chance of playing a major role to bring out the voices of 

marginalized groups, the other, thus advancing decolonization. 

The authors make a good contribution to raising awareness among anthropologists and other 

social scientists to treat their subjects fairly and help them to be the change they want to be, 

rather than making them victims of academics’ interpretations and misconceptions. The authors 

show how their co-authors have helped them shift their approach, as they acknowledge them as 

co-authors based on their work and the role they played, instead of research assistants.

Decolonizing anthropology is a challenge, especially developing enough studies that are not 

biased or based on colonial interpretations and approaches of the so-called West. 



The authors have chosen music and theatrical performances for disseminating their findings and 

engaging the research subjects directly. That was a very good approach for presenting results, 

especially to reach more people. This may not apply to some topics, but it is the anthropologist’s 

responsibility to think of the best approach to bring the feedback and share the results of their 

study with the locals/subjects, rather than only focus on their own personal academic benefits 

and status. Activism and advocacy in anthropology is also addressed in this book. The authors 

spend the first four chapters educating us about their approach, methodology and analysing the 

situation in relation to their project. 

We think this will be an important book for those interested in becoming anthropologists as well 

as for established anthropologists. It will help them understand their role better not only as 

academics but also in engaging their subjects in the research process. The book is encouraging us 

to open our minds, addressing the colonial impact in academia, to decolonize and liberate 

ourselves from intellectual and academic colonization. This is a call for anthropologists to 

empower others to speak for themselves, to interpret, theorize and work on developing 

themselves, as per their own interests and to contribute their local knowledge to the rest of the 

world.

Hussein Masimbi is a musician and teacher at the national arts institute TaSUBa in Tanzania, 

with an MA in music education from Texas Tech University. 

Paula Uimonen is professor of social anthropology at Stockholm University, Sweden, with 

fieldwork experience from Nigeria and Tanzania.

Hussein Masimbi and Paula Uimonen are research collaborators in a new project on Swahili 

Ocean Worlds, which explores sea sustainability with fishing communities in coastal Tanzania.

© 2021 Hussein Masimbi & Paula Uimonen 


