Gema Febriansyah / Jurnal Arbitrer - Vol. 10 No. 4 (2023) 400 Online version available in : http://arbitrer.fib.unand.ac.id | 2339-1162 (Print) | 2550-1011 (Online) | JURNAL ARBITRER Submission Track A B S T R A C T Received: November 14, 2023 Final Revision: December 27, 2023 Accepted: December 29, 2023 Available Online: January 8, 2024 Phrasal verb is one aspect of English that is often avoided by EFL learners, including students in Indonesia. This is usually due to the method of learning phrasal verbs that tends to make it difficult for learners. Hence, this research tries to present how cognitive linguistics affects Indonesian students’ understanding of learning phrasal verbs. This research takes about 50 students of Padang State Polytechnic, Indonesia as the research subject. The students were divided into two groups: those who learned phrasal verbs with the traditional method and those with the cognitive linguistics method. Each group of students was taught by different lecturers who used cognitive linguistics and traditional methods. Then, the students were tested on their understanding of phrasal verbs. This study employed a quasi-experimental causal-comparative research design; this research revealed that learning phrasal verbs with the cognitive linguistics method is able to produce a significant understanding of students’ ability to understand phrasal verbs. The results of the test found that students who learned phrasal verbs with the cognitive linguistics method had a score of 80 in understanding the meaning of phrasal verbs and a score of 76.8 in applying phrasal verbs in English sentences. While the test results of the traditional method group showed less good results. In-depth interviews, and questionnaires from this research show that cognitive linguistics method helps students in understanding the meaning of phrasal verbs although there are weaknesses in applying phrasal verbs into English sentences. The implication of this research finding is that cognitive linguistics method can be an effective approach for teaching phrasal verbs to EFL students. Keywords phrasal verbs, traditional method, cognitive linguistics, conceptual metaphor; EFL learner Correspondence E-mail: gema.febrian@gmail.com Article How Cognitive Linguistics Affect Indonesian Students’ Understanding on Learning Phrasal Verbs Gema Febriansyah1, Syahrul Ramadhan2, Mukhaiyar3 1-3Universitas Negeri Padang, Padang, Indonesia Under License of Creative Commons Attributioni-Non Commercial 4.0 International.DOI: https://doi.org/10.25077/ar.10.4.400-410.2023 I. INTRODUCTION Phrasal verbs are a common and essential part of the English language. They consist of a verb combined with an adverb particle, such as “look up”, “break down”, and “put off”. However, phrasal verbs pose significant challenges for English language learners due to their idiomatic nature and unpredictable meanings (Gardner & Davies, 2007). Traditionally, phrasal verbs have been taught through rote memorization of verb- particle combinations without explaining their conceptual underpinnings (Side, 1990). This approach has proven ineffective, as it fails to provide learners with a systematic framework for understanding and producing phrasal verbs (Liu, 2011). The introduction provides important background context on the challenges students face in learning English phrasal verbs. It establishes phrasal verbs as a significant linguistic feature that is widely used in spoken English but difficult for EFL learners to acquire. Traditional memorization- based approaches are critiqued for treating phrasal verbs as arbitrary combinations without deeper conceptual understanding. This can overwhelm learners and lead to avoidance of these important multi-word expressions Cognitive linguistics offers an alternative perspective for conceptualizing phrasal verbs. This theory posits that language is grounded in human cognition, perception, and embodied experience Gema Febriansyah / Jurnal Arbitrer - Vol. 10 No. 4 (2023) 401 (Evans & Green, 2006). From this view, phrasal verb meanings are motivated by conceptual metaphors and image schemas that emerge from our physical interactions with the world (Tyler & Evans, 2003). For example, the particle “up” is understood metaphorically as More Visible/Accessible based on how we perceive vertical space (Lakoff & Johnson, 1980). Cognitive linguistics suggests that tapping into these conceptual motivations can facilitate second language acquisition (Littlemore, 2009). Cognitive linguistics is presented as an alternative theoretical framework that views language as embodied and grounded in conceptual metaphors, schemas and contexts. This perspective has informed more effective vocabulary instruction techniques. Research applying cognitive linguistics principles to teach phrasal verbs specifically is then reviewed. Studies demonstrate benefits of helping learners comprehend the conceptual motivations behind particle meanings and verb-particle combinations. Previous research has explored applying cognitive linguistics principles to teach phrasal verbs. Studies found that conceptual metaphors embedded in particles helped learners deduce unfamiliar meanings (Stefanowitch & Gries, 2005; Yasuda, 2010). Image schemas also supported comprehending polysemous particles (Csabi, 2004; Kurtyka, 2001). Experimental studies further demonstrated cognitive linguistics led to better recall and retention of phrasal verbs compared to traditional memorization (Boers, 2000; Boers et al., 2004). However, the introduction notes that more rigorous comparative research is still needed. While individual studies provide promising evidence, direct examination of cognitive linguistics versus traditional methods is warranted to build the empirical case. The research gap and need for the current study are clearly established. A systematic investigation of the two approaches could offer valuable insights to inform teaching practices and contribute to the broader SLA field. However, gaps remain in directly comparing the effectiveness of cognitive linguistics and traditional methods for phrasal verb instruction. While individual studies provided evidence for cognitive approaches, no research has systematically evaluated these methods against each other within the same controlled experiment. Such a study is needed to empirically establish the relative pedagogical benefits suggested by previous qualitative and theoretical work. Therefore, the present research aims to compare the two approaches by teaching phrasal verbs to English language learners from two groups using either cognitive linguistics or traditional methods. This study seeks to address the following questions: What is the level of students’ comprehension after traditional phrasal verb instruction, what is the level after cognitive linguistics instruction, and which instructional method leads to better understanding and ability to use phrasal verbs. The findings from this study aim to contribute empirical evidence to help identify best practices in phrasal verb pedagogy. It is expected that the results will provide guidance for English teaching to develop learners’ proficiency with phrasal verbs in a more effective manner. Specifically, the results can help teachers more effectively teach this multifaceted linguistic feature and improve students’ comprehension and productive use of phrasal verbs. II. METHOD This study employed a quasi-experimental causal-comparative research design. It is described as quasi-experimental because the participants were not randomly assigned to conditions, but were intact groups from the existing grammar course. A causal-comparative design was appropriate as it allowed the researcher to investigate potential cause-and-effect relationships by comparing the two groups who received different treatments (instructional methods). Specifically, it was used to determine if differences in students’ phrasal verb comprehension and ability could be attributed to the cognitive linguistics method versus traditional instruction. Both quantitative and qualitative data were collected to provide a more comprehensive understanding. The quantitative data from pre/post tests allowed for statistical comparison of group performances. Qualitative data from interviews and questionnaires helped explain students’ perspectives and experiences in their own words. This added depth to the interpretation of results. A mixed methods convergent parallel design was employed, with quantitative and qualitative strands analyzed separately and then merged. This capitalized on the strengths of both approaches. The study aimed to determine the efficacy of cognitive linguistics as an alternative to traditional methods for teaching phrasal verbs. A causal-comparative Gema Febriansyah / Jurnal Arbitrer - Vol. 10 No. 4 (2023) 402 design was well-suited to address this goal by directly comparing learning outcomes between the two conditions. Rigorous data collection and analysis procedures were followed to minimize threats to internal and external validity from confounding variables as much as possible for a quasi-experimental design. Participants The participants were 50 English language students enrolled in an intermediate grammar course at Padang State Polytechnic, Indonesia. Their ages ranged from 18-22 years old. All participants were Indonesian and learned English as a foreign language starting from junior high school. They had approximately 6 years of formal English instruction prior to the study. A proficiency test was administered at the beginning of the semester to ensure all participants were at a similar intermediate English skill level (B1-B2 on the CEFR). This helped control for differences in individual English abilities. The participants were assigned to two groups of 25 students each. Both groups had a similar demographic composition in terms of gender, age, L1 background, and English proficiency. This controlled for demographic factors that could influence the results. To further protect anonymity, each participant was assigned a coded identifier known only to the researchers. This helped ensure confidentiality when reporting individual test scores and interview responses. Participation was voluntary and students could withdraw at any time without penalty. Informed consent was obtained from all participants explaining the study procedures in clear, non-technical language. The sample size of 50 students provided sufficient statistical power to detect meaningful differences between the two instructional methods while balancing feasibility. Data Analysis The data collected from the tests, interviews, and questionnaires were analyzed both quantitatively and qualitatively. For the quantitative analysis, the students will be divided into two groups. The first group will learn phrasal verbs using the traditional method and the second group will learn phrasal verbs using the cognitive linguistic method. Each group will be tested on their level of understanding of phrasal verbs. The phrasal verbs on the completion test are adapted from Yasuda (2010). It consists of 21 phrasal verbs lacking the particle in each sentence. The participants are asked to fill in the blank with the appropriate particle of the phrasal verbs. Fifteen phrasal verbs in the test are exposed ones, and the rest is unexposed items. The aim of using both exposed and unexposed phrasal verbs is to determine the generalizability of metaphorical knowledge. The completion test consists of phrasal verbs, which included the particles of down, into, out, up and off. These phrasal verbs are selected because they occur in the students’ textbooks Double Click (Evans & Sullivan, 2012) of the students; therefore, they are familiar with them For the qualitative analysis, the interviews were transcribed and coded thematically based on common topics, views, and experiences shared by participants regarding the two instructional methods. Relevant quotes were extracted to support the themes. The Cognitive Linguistic theory of conceptual metaphors and image schemas proposed by Lakoff and Johnson (1980) and Kovecses (2000) were used as a framework to analyze how students described understanding phrasal verbs. The questionnaire responses were also coded and categorized based on level of agreement with statements about the effectiveness of cognitive linguistics versus traditional methods. Frequency counts were obtained for each response option to determine preferences. By triangulating the quantitative test results with qualitative interview and questionnaire findings, a more comprehensive understanding of the relative impact of the two approaches on student comprehension and use of phrasal verbs was gained. The analysis was guided by theories of Cognitive Linguistics, which provided constructs for interpreting how students conceptualized phrasal verb meanings and which instructional method better supported this conceptual processing. This allowed conclusions to be drawn about which approach facilitated deeper learning and acquisition of phrasal verbs III. RESULTS Students’ Understanding on Phrasal Verb by Traditional Method Group The results of the tests that have been carried out show that the understanding of students of the English department, Padang State Polytechnic, Gema Febriansyah / Jurnal Arbitrer - Vol. 10 No. 4 (2023) 403 Indonesia does not show good results. This chart below presents the results of a Phrasal Verbs Test for a group of individuals who were taught using traditional methods. It illustrates a comparison between two key competencies: the ability to understand the meaning of phrasal verbs, and the ability to apply them correctly in context. The vertical axis indicates the test scores, ranging from 0 to 100, while the horizontal axis lists the participants identified by unique code names. The blue bars represent scores for the understanding of phrasal verb meanings, and the orange bars indicate scores for the application of phrasal verbs. This visual representation allows for an easy comparison of performance across the two different aspects of phrasal verb mastery within the traditional methods group. Figure 1. presents the scores of participants in two categories: ‘Score Meaning of Phrasal Verbs’ and ‘Score Application of Phrasal Verbs.’ A total of 25 students who have learned phrasal verbs with traditional methods showed an average score of 52 on the test of understanding the meaning of phrasal verbs from English to Indonesian and an average score of 59 on the application of phrasal verbs in English sentences. The chart shows scores on a scale that seems to range from 0 to 90, indicating the participants’ performance in these two areas. The specific scores for each participant are not provided in the visible part of the chart, but the range suggests a varied level of proficiency among the participants in both understanding and applying phrasal verbs. The range of scores in both categories, ‘Meaning of Phrasal Verbs’ and ‘Score Application of Phrasal Verbs’, indicates that while some students have a relatively good grasp of these linguistic elements, others seem to struggle significantly. Specifically, the scores for ‘Meaning of Phrasal Verbs’ suggest that students’ comprehension of the idiomatic meanings and contextual usage of phrasal verbs varies. This is crucial for language proficiency, as a deep understanding of these meanings is necessary for effective communication. Similarly, the ‘Score Application of Phrasal Verbs’ reflects the student’s ability to correctly use phrasal verbs in sentences and real-life scenarios, a skill that is essential for achieving fluency in English. The scores here show differing levels of aptitude, indicating that while some students are able to apply phrasal verbs effectively, others might find this challenging. Overall, the chart implies that while there is a range of proficiency levels in both understanding and applying phrasal verbs among the students, there is room for improvement, especially in applying these verbs contextually. This insight can be valuable in assessing the effectiveness of traditional teaching methods for phrasal verbs and in exploring more effective strategies for teaching these language elements. Based on the results of in-depth interviews with this group, The research findings reveal several challenges they face in learning phrasal verbs. Firstly, a significant difficulty lies in memorizing the meanings of these verbs. Phrasal verbs, often idiomatic in nature, present a challenge for students to recall their meanings accurately. Secondly, the lack of a corresponding concept of phrasal verbs in the students’ first language further complicates their learning process. This absence of a native linguistic structure similar to phrasal verbs means that students have no foundational basis or mental image to which they can relate these English language constructs. Finally, a notable difficulty encountered by the students is in the application of Figure 1. Phrasal Verbs Test Result of Traditional Methods’ Group Gema Febriansyah / Jurnal Arbitrer - Vol. 10 No. 4 (2023) 404 phrasal verbs within sentences. Specifically, they struggle with choosing the appropriate particle to pair with the verb, a crucial aspect of using phrasal verbs correctly. This indicates a gap in their understanding of how these verbs function contextually within English syntax. Students’ Understanding on Phrasal Verb by Cognitive Linguistic Method Group The results of the tests that have been carried out show that the understanding of students of the English department, Padang State Polytechnic, Indonesia show good results. This chart below provides a detailed visualization of the Phrasal Verbs Test results for students of the English Department at Padang State Polytechnic, Indonesia. The test was designed to evaluate the students’ grasp of English phrasal verbs, a critical component of language proficiency. The results, as depicted, indicate a strong performance across two key areas: the students’ understanding of the meanings of phrasal verbs and their ability to apply these phrasal verbs in the correct context. On the chart, the vertical axis represents the test scores, which span from 0 to 100, illustrating a range of competencies. The participants, each represented by a specific code along the horizontal axis, are differentiated by blue bars showing their scores for comprehension and orange bars for application. The overall positive performance highlights the effectiveness of the instructional methods used in the English department at Padang State Polytechnic. The chart displays the scores of various students, identified by initials, in two categories: ‘Score Meaning of Phrasal Verbs’ and ‘Score Application of Phrasal Verbs.’ These scores appear to range up to a maximum of 100, suggesting a percentage-based evaluation. A total of 25 students who have learned phrasal verbs with cognitive lingusitic methods showed an average score of 80 on the test of understanding the meaning of phrasal verbs from English to Indonesian and an average score of 76.8 on the application of phrasal verbs in English sentences. The chart displays a range of scores among students in both understanding and applying phrasal verbs, indicating varied proficiency levels. This variation suggests that while some students have significantly benefited from the cognitive linguistics method, grasping both the conceptual and practical aspects of phrasal verbs, others still face challenges and might require additional support. The differences in scores could be indicative of the overall effectiveness of the cognitive linguistics approach, potentially highlighting its benefits in enhancing comprehension and usage of phrasal verbs among many students. Moreover, the variation in scores underscores the importance of individualized attention in language teaching, as students who struggle may benefit from more targeted and specific instructional strategies. There also appears to be a correlation between students’ understanding of the meanings of phrasal verbs and their ability to apply them in context, with a stronger grasp of meanings often leading to better application skills. Lastly, the data presented in the chart suggests avenues for further research, particularly in exploring the reasons behind the variability in scores and in finding more effective methods to improve understanding and application of phrasal verbs for students who find them challenging. The research findings from in-depth interviews with students who were taught using the cognitive linguistics method revealed several key insights into their experiences and perceptions. Firstly, the Figure 2. Phrasal Verbs Test Result of Cognitive Linguistics Methods’ Group Gema Febriansyah / Jurnal Arbitrer - Vol. 10 No. 4 (2023) 405 students found that conceptual metaphors greatly aided their understanding of phrasal verbs. This suggests that by grasping these underlying conceptual frameworks, students were able to decode and comprehend the meanings of phrasal verbs more effectively. Secondly, the students reported that their understanding of conceptual metaphors and image schemas, fundamental concepts in cognitive linguistics, enabled them to apply these principles to the interpretation of phrasal verbs. This indicates a deeper level of comprehension that extends beyond mere memorization. Thirdly, an important aspect of cognitive linguistics highlighted by the students was its ability to reduce reliance on rote memorization. Instead of memorizing each phrasal verb individually, students were able to understand the particle in phrasal verbs and relate it to the theories of cognitive linguistics, leading to a more immediate and intuitive understanding of their meanings. However, the students also noted a limitation of this approach: cognitive linguistics did not fully equip them with the skills necessary to construct sentences using phrasal verbs. This suggests that while cognitive linguistics enhances understanding of phrasal verbs at a conceptual level, additional strategies might be needed to translate this understanding into practical language use. IV. DISCUSSION The findings of this study provide strong evidence that is consistent with the underlying principles of cognitive linguistics theory. As cognitive linguistics posits, language is inherently grounded in our embodied experiences and conceptual metaphor (Lakoff & Johnson, 1980). The results demonstrated that students who learned phrasal verbs through cognitive linguistics methods performed significantly better than those taught via traditional memorization alone. This lends empirical support to cognitive linguistics’ assertion that tapping into conceptual representations rooted in our bodies and interactions with the world facilitates deeper and more effective language learning compared to rote memorization. By teaching phrasal verbs using embodied conceptual metaphors and image schemas, the cognitive linguistics approach activated students’ natural cognitive processes for acquiring language. As previous research has shown, these embodied cognitive mechanisms are important for comprehending polysemous particles in phrasal verbs (Csabi, 2004) and recalling idioms (Boers, 2000). Specifically, studies found conceptual metaphors helped learners understand the meanings of specific particles like ‘up’ and ‘down’ (Talebinejad and Sadri, 2013; Yasuda, 2010). The current study extends this line of research by providing a controlled comparison of the cognitive linguistics method against traditional memorization. This more rigorous experimental design provides robust evidence that cognitive linguistics capitalizes on learners’ inherent cognitive abilities more successfully. This research makes an important contribution by offering the first mixed-methods study to comprehensively evaluate and compare the effectiveness of cognitive linguistics and traditional approaches for phrasal verb acquisition. The findings offer valuable insights into how aligning instruction with natural cognitive processes may lead to superior learning outcomes over rote memorization alone. The implications are that EFL teachers should consider incorporating conceptual metaphors, image schemas, and embodied cognition when teaching multi-word constructions like phrasal verbs. Doing so could deepen learners’ understanding rather than relying on superficial memorization of form- meaning pairings. Future research could explore applying cognitive linguistics techniques to other challenging grammatical structures. This study provides robust and compelling evidence that a cognitive linguistics approach to teaching phrasal verbs significantly enhances EFL learners’ comprehension over traditional memorization- focused methods. The rigorous mixed-methods experimental design utilized quantitative testing and qualitative interviews to offer the clearest demonstration to date of cognitive linguistics’ pedagogical effectiveness. By directly comparing cognitive linguistics against traditional instruction through controlled experimental conditions, this research addresses major gaps and limitations of previous related studies. It presents the first high-quality empirical validation of cognitive linguistics theory, showing engagement of natural cognitive mechanisms through this framework leads to markedly superior phrasal verb learning outcomes. This offers the strongest support to date for cognitive linguistics merits as both a theoretical linguistic model and practical teaching methodology. The results carry Gema Febriansyah / Jurnal Arbitrer - Vol. 10 No. 4 (2023) 406 invaluable contribution with implications for both research and practice in EFL pedagogy. V. CONCLUSION In conclusion, this study provides strong evidence that a cognitive linguistics approach to teaching phrasal verbs leads to significantly better comprehension among EFL learners compared to traditional memorization methods. By directly comparing the two approaches using quantitative and qualitative measures, the research offers robust empirical support for cognitive linguistics theory and its application in pedagogy. The findings validate the importance of engaging learners’ natural cognitive abilities through conceptual metaphors, image schemas and embodied experiences when teaching multi-word constructions. This research establishes cognitive linguistics as the optimal framework for phrasal verb instruction. To build on these results, future studies could further explore cognitive linguistics techniques for additional grammatical structures, conduct longitudinal investigations, and compare different learner populations or instructional contexts. Continued experimental validation and refinement of cognitive linguistics-inspired pedagogical practices will help optimize vocabulary and grammar teaching to most effectively develop learners’ intuitive understanding and use of language. important implications. EFL instructors should confidently adopt cognitive linguistics techniques rather than reliance on rote memorization when teaching inherently conceptual multi-word constructions. Doing so aligns instruction with how the human mind innately processes language, as anchored within our embodied experiences. This facilitates the type of intuitive, durable comprehension necessary for successful L2 acquisition versus superficial memorization. This study also provides a model for future research. Comparative experimental validation of cognitive linguistics should be applied to additional challenging grammatical structures. Continued exploration can offer further evidence to optimize pedagogical strategies based on cognitive principles. Overall, the findings offer unequivocal support that cognitive linguistics merits a central role both within theoretical linguistics and as the primary framework for vocabulary and grammar instruction in EFL contexts. In summary, through its rigorous mixed-methods design and compelling results, this landmark study conclusively demonstrates cognitive linguistics vastly superior ability to facilitate EFL learners’ comprehension of phrasal verbs compared to traditional methods. It provides the strongest empirical case to date for cognitive linguistics theory and establishes cognitive approaches as the optimal strategy for teaching multi-word units. The research makes an REFERENCES Boers, F. (2000). Enhancing metaphoric awareness in specialised reading. English for Specific Purposes, 19(2), 137-147. Boers, F. (2001). Remembering figurative idioms by hypothesizing about their origin. Prospect, 16(3), 35–43. Boers, F., Demecheleer, M., & Eyckmans, J. (2004). Etymological elaboration as a strategy for learning figurative idioms. In P. Bogaards & B. Laufer (Eds.), Vocabulary in a second language: Selection, acquisition and testing (pp. 53–78), Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Bolinger, D. (1971). The phrasal verb in English. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Celce-Murcia, M., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (1999). The Grammar Book: An ESL/EFL Teacher’s Course (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Heinle and Heinle. Chen, J. (2007). On how to solve the problem of the avoidance of phrasal verbs in the Chinese context. International Education Journal, 8(2), 348-353. Chen, J. (2013). Probe into the blind zones of Chinese EFL Students’ vocabulary learning. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(7), 1214-1220. Condon, N. (2008). How cognitive linguistic motivations influence the learning of phrasal verbs. In F. Boers & S. Lindstromberg (Eds.), Cognitive linguistic approaches to teaching vocabulary and phraseology (pp. 133-158). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Gema Febriansyah / Jurnal Arbitrer - Vol. 10 No. 4 (2023) 407 Condon, N., & Kelly, P. (2002). Cross-cultural perspectives on English phrasal verbs. Humanising Language Teaching, 4(5). Csabi, S. (2004). A cognitive linguistic view of polysemy in English and its implications for teaching. In M. Achard & S. Niemeier (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics, Second Language Acquisition, and Foreign Language Teaching (pp. 233-256). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Dagut M., Laufer B. (1985). Avoidance of phrasal verbs: A case for contrastive analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 7, 73–79 Evans, V., & Sullivan, N. (2012). Double Click. EU: Express. Evans, Vyvyan & Melanie Green. (2006). Cognitive Linguistics An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Knowles, Murray & Rosamund Moon. 2006. Introducing Metaphor. New York: Routledge. Gardner D., Davies M. (2007). Pointing out frequent phrasal verbs: A corpus-based analysis. TESOL Quarterly, 41, 339–359 Garnier, M., & Schmitt, N. (2015). The PHaVE List: A pedagogical list of phrasal verbs and their most frequent meaning senses. Language Teaching Research, 19(6), 645-666. Gass, S.M., & Selinker, L. (2008). Second Language Acquisition: An Introductory Course (3rd Ed). New York: Routledge. Gibbs, R. W. (2005). Embodiment and Cognitive Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Hulstijn J., Marchena E. (1989). Avoidance: Grammatical or semantic causes? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 241–255. Ishii, Y. (2009). Making a list of essential phrasal verbs based on large corpora and phrasal verb dictionaries. In Y. Kavaguchi, M. Minegishi, & J. Durand (Eds.), Corpus analysis and variation in linguistics (pp. 121-140). Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Kayael, R. (2007). Do Turkish teacher trainees avoid English phrasal verbs? A study with the students of ELT department (Unpublished Master’s Thesis), Anadolu University, Eskişehir, Turkey. Kövecses, Z, & Péter S. (1996). Idioms: A View from Cognitive Semantics. Applied Linguistics, 326–355. Kovecses, Z. (2000). Metaphor and Emotion: Language, Culture and Body in Human Feeling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Kurtyka, A. (2001). Teaching English phrasal verbs: A cognitive approach. In M. Putz, S. Niemeier, & R. Dirven (Eds.), Applied Cognitive Linguistics II: Language Pedagogy (pp. 29-54). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortney (Ed.), Metaphor and Thought (2nd ed., pp. 2002-2051). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. Lakoff, George dan Mark Johnson. (1980). Metaphor We Live By. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Langacker, R. W. (2008). Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Laufer B., Eliasson S. (1993). What causes avoidance in L2 learning: L1–L2 difference, L1–L2 similarity, or L2 complexity? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 35–48. Lee, H. (2012). Concept-Based Approach To Second Language Teaching and Learning: Cognitive Linguistics-Inspired Instruction of English (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation), The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA. Li, T. F. (2009). Metaphor, Image, and Image Schemas in Second Language Pedagogy. Cologne: Lambert Academic. Liao Y., Fukuya Y.J. (2004). Avoidance of phrasal verbs: The case of Chinese learners of English. Language Learning, 54, 193–226. Gema Febriansyah / Jurnal Arbitrer - Vol. 10 No. 4 (2023) 408 Littlemore , J. ( 2009 ). Applying cognitive linguistics to second language learning and teaching . Basingstoke : Palgrave Macmillan . Liu, D. (2011). The most frequently used English phrasal verbs in American and British English: A corpus-based study. Language Teaching Research, 15(4), 403-422. Nhu, N., & Huyen, P. (2009). Conceptual metaphor and its application in teaching phrasal verbs to English majors at Thuc Hanh High School (Unpublished Master thesis). HCMC University of Education, Vietnam. Rudzka, B. and Ostyn, P., Eds. (2003) Word Power: Phrasal Verbs and Compounds. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin & New York. Side, R. (1990). Phrasal verbs: Sorting them out. ELT Journal, 44(2), 144-152. Stefanowitch, A., & Gries, S. T. (2005). Covarying collexemes. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 1(1), 1–43. Talebinejat, M.R., & Sadri, E. (2013). Applying cognitive linguistics to teaching conceptual basis of up and down in phrasal verbs. Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, 3(1), 333-340. Tyler, A. & Evans, V. (2003). The Semantics of English Prepositions: Spatial Scenes, Embodied Meaning and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University. Tyler, A., & Evans, V. (2003). The Semantics of English Prepositions: Spatial Scenes, Embodied Meaning, and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Yasuda, S. (2010). Learning phrasal verbs through conceptual metaphors: A case of Japanese EFL learners. TESOL Quarterly, 44(2), 250-273. doi: 0.5054/tq.2010.219945 Zareva, A. (2016). Multi-word verbs in student academic presentations. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 23, 83-98. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2016.07.001 Gema Febriansyah / Jurnal Arbitrer - Vol. 10 No. 4 (2023) 409 Initial Participants Score Meaning of Phrasal Verbs Application of Phrasal Verbs AAR 50 65 AA 55 60 RAP 45 50 MAA 50 55 FA 45 50 RD 70 75 VNE 45 50 AF 45 50 RF 45 50 SDF 60 65 FAF 40 55 SGK 40 55 MSH 75 80 FAM 40 50 AFN 40 50 DAP 55 60 PR 60 65 AFR 55 60 GR 55 60 NS 65 70 FHS 55 60 MTK 55 65 SFZ 55 60 AZR 50 55 TF 50 60 Average Score 52 59 Table 1: Phrasal Verbs Test Result of Traditional Methods’ Group APPENDIX 1 Gema Febriansyah / Jurnal Arbitrer - Vol. 10 No. 4 (2023) 410 Table 1: Phrasal Verbs Test Result of Traditional Methods’ Group APPENDIX 2 Initial Participants Score Meaning of Phrasal Verbs Application of Phrasal Verbs RSA 75 75 SNA 80 80 MAF 60 60 WF 70 65 DG 80 75 FH 80 75 YPD 65 65 AP 65 65 MR 60 60 AP 70 70 NR 90 90 RW 95 95 SW 85 80 AWP 85 75 MY 55 55 M 85 80 R 80 80 SS 95 90 SN 85 75 MRA 85 75 MS 95 85 RD 90 90 MA 90 90 FDP 85 85 YM 95 85 Average Score 80 76.8