Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine. 2021; 9(1): e40 OR I G I N A L RE S E A RC H Awareness of Iranian Medical Sciences Students Towards Basic Life Support; a Cross-Sectional study Meisam Akhlaghdoust1,2, Saeid Safari1,2∗, Poorya Davoodi3, Shaghayegh Soleimani4, Maryam Khorasani4, Fatemeh Raoufizadeh4, Hosna Karimi5, Elahe Etesami5, Zeynab Hamzehloei4, Seyedeh Sara Sadeghi4, Ladan Heidaresfahani4, Tooba Ebadi Fard Azar4, Haniyeh Afshari Badrloo4 1. Functional Neurosurgery Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. 2. USERN Office, Functional Neurosurgery Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. 3. Pars Advanced and Minimally Invasive Medical Manners Research Center, Pars Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. 4. Islamic Azad University, Tehran Medical Sciences Branch, Tehran, Iran 5. Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran. Received: March 2021; Accepted: April 2021; Published online: 20 May 2021 Abstract: Introduction: Augmentation of the number of trained basic life support (BLS) providers can remarkably reduce the number of cardiac arrest victims. The aim of this study was to evaluate the level of BLS awareness among students of medical sciences in Iran. Methods: This multicenter cross-sectional study was performed on medi- cal students at the 4 major medical schools in Tehran, the capital of Iran, between Jan 2018 and Feb 2019, using convenience sampling method. The level of medical sciences students’ awareness of BLS was measured using an international questionnaire. Results: Finally, 1210 students with the mean age of 21.2 ± 2.3 years completed the survey (79% female). 133 (10.9%) students had CPR experience and none had received any formal train- ing. None of the responders could answer all questions correctly. The mean awareness score of participants was 11.93 ± 2.87 (range: 10.13 -17.25). The awareness score of participants was high in 49 (4.04 %) participants, moderate in 218 (18.01%), and low in 943 (77.93%) of studied cases. Conclusion: Based on the findings of this study, more than 70% of the studied medical sciences students obtained a low score on BLS awareness. Keywords: Awareness; cardiopulmonary resuscitation; heart arrest; attitude Cite this article as: Akhlaghdoust M, Safari S, Davoodi P, Soleimani S, Khorasani M, Raoufizadeh F, Karimi H, Etesami E, Hamzehloei Z, Sadeghi S S, Heidaresfahani L, Ebadi Fard Azar T, Afshari Badrloo H. Awareness of Iranian Medical Sciences Students Towards Basic Life Support; a Cross-Sectional study. Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2021; 9(1): e40. https://doi.org/10.22037/aaem.v9i1.1231. 1. Introduction Cardiac arrest is a fatal condition responsible for a large num- ber of deaths in the modern world, and it has remained com- mon worldwide (1–3). Deaths caused by cardiac arrest can be prevented via simple maneuvers and skills most of the time (5). Cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is a life-saving and valuable technique that was invented back in 1960 (6); it is indeed a facile procedure that permits almost everyone to sustain life and decreases mortality up to 50% in golden minutes after cardiac and respiratory arrests (7,8). ∗Corresponding Author: Saeid Safari; Functional Neurosurgery Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Email: safari.s@sbmu.ac.ir, Tel: +9822724211, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002- 5917-633X. Based on the place in which a cardiac arrest takes place, it is divided into two categories of out-of-hospital cardiac ar- rest (OHCA) and in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA). OHCA oc- curs approximately in 19-104 per 100,000 persons each year (0.019-0.104%), and 10% of them are said to be saved at the hospital (9). Statics present that 350,000 people in Europe die annually because of OHCA (9). In the USA, OHCA is respon- sible for 760,000 deaths per year (10). Augmentation of the number of trained basic life support (BLS) providers can remarkably reduce the number of car- diac arrest victims (16). Therefore, many countries world- wide have integrated these topics into the curricula of their educational centers or even workplaces believing that any in- dividual in the society should have sufficient knowledge and awareness to provide BLS when needed (18). Having this in mind, expectation from physicians and paramedical staff is This open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0). Downloaded from: http://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/aaem M. Akhlaghdoust and et al. 2 naturally higher as their career requires this knowledge. This study aimed to evaluate the level of BLS awareness among Iranian medical sciences students studying in four major Iranian medical schools. 2. Methods 2.1. Study design and participants This multicenter cross-sectional study was performed on medical students studying in the 4 major medical schools (Tehran Medical Sciences of Islamic Azad University, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, and Iran University of Medical Sciences) in Tehran, the capital of Iran, between Jan 2018 and Feb 2019, using convenience sampling method. The level of medi- cal sciences students’ awareness of BLS was measured us- ing an international questionnaire. The study protocol was approved by Ethics committee of Iran University of Medical Sciences (IR.IUMS.REC.1399.1291). 2.2. Participants Being a student in one of the fields of medical sciences (medicine, nursing, and midwifery) was the inclusion crite- rion. There was not any sex or age limitation in this study. In- complete questionnaires were excluded (29 questionnaire). 2.3. Data gathering Demographic data, age, CPR experience, sex, educational status, and attendance of BLS courses were collected using a checklist. In addition, an international questionnaire that measures the level of awareness about BLS was used for eval- uating the awareness level of participants regarding BLS. We used the Persian version of the international questionnaire measuring the awareness of participants regarding BLS. This questionnaire was designed by Özbilgin Ş et.al. based on the latest version of AHA guideline. The international question- naire measuring awareness of BLS has 20 multiple-choice questions and each question has 1 point (19). The range of scores of this questionnaire is 16-20 (high), 11-15 (moderate), and 0-10 (Low). Persian version of this questionnaire is vali- dated by Ziabari et al. 2019 (6). 2.4. Statistical analysis A required sample size of 1210 participants, was calculated using Rao soft software. For statistical analysis, SPSS software version 22 (SPSS Inc. Chicago, IL, United States) was used. The findings were presented as mean ± standard deviation or frequency and percentage. Table 1: Baseline characteristics of studied participants Variable Total Age (years) Mean ± SD 21.2 ± 2.3 Sex Female 956 (79.1) Male 254 (20.9) Educational status Medical student 643 (53.1) Nursing student 296 (24.5) Midwifery student 271 (22.4) Experience of CPR Yes 133 (11.0) No 1077 (89.0) Attendance of BLS courses Yes 194 (16.1) No 1016 (83.9) Data are presented as frequency (%). SD: standard deviation; BLS: basic life support; CPR: cardiopulmonary resuscitation. 3. Results Finally, 1210 students with the mean age of 21.2 ± 2.3 years completed the survey (79% female). Baseline characteris- tics of studied participants are presented in table 1. Among the participants, 133 (10.9%) had CPR experience and none had received any formal training. Table 2 shows the results of students’ responses to 20 questions regarding BLS aware- ness. None of the responders could answer all questions cor- rectly. The mean awareness score of participants was 11.93 ± 2.87 (range: 10.13 -17.25). The awareness score of partici- pants was high in 49 (4.04 %) participants, moderate in 218 (18.01%), and low in 943 (77.93%) of studied cases. 4. Discussion Based on the findings of this study, more than 70% of the studied medical sciences students obtained a low score on BLS awareness. Nowadays, with the growth of cardio- pulmonary diseases, the rate of cardiac arrest has been re- markably increasing (3-6). It is expected from a majority of community members to be efficiently aware of BLS (espe- cially CPR) (7). CPR is one of the essential skills that people of a society have to learn because it is a life-saving skill and can reduce the number of OHCA victims (8). Based on the reports, performing proper basic life support can reduce the mortality rate, especially in OHCA (3-5, 7, 9). The Findings in this cross-sectional study showed low aware- ness of BLS among medical sciences students. About 90% of cases had no experience of CPR, and more than 95% of par- ticipants had no idea about safety, and they did not know what they have to do when someone lies unresponsive on the street. Many people do not like to give mouth-to-mouth This open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0). Downloaded from: http://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/aaem 3 Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine. 2021; 9(1): e40 Table 2: Answers to basic life support awareness questions Question Answer Correct 1. What is the abbreviation of “BLS”? Basic Life Support 280 (23.1) 2. When you find someone unresponsive on the road, what will your first response be? (Note: You are alone there) Look for Safety 149 (12.3) 3. If you confirm somebody is not responding to you even after shaking and shouting at him, what will be your imme- diate action? Activate EMS 436 (36.0) 4. What is the location for chest compression? Mid Chest 331 (27.4) 5. What is the location for chest compression in infants? One fingerbreadth above the nipple line 230 (19.0) 6. If you do not want to give mouth-to-mouth CPR, the fol- lowing can be done EXCEPT No CPR 137 (11.3) 7. How do you give rescue breathing in infants? Mouth-to-mouth and nose 364 (30.0) 8. Depth of compression in adults during CPR 1 to 1/2 inches 137 (11.3) 9. Depth of compression in Children during CPR 1/2 to 1/3 depth of chest 85 (7.0) 10. Depth of compression in neonates during CPR 1/2 to 1/3 depth of chest 77 (6.4) 11. Rate of chest compression in adults and Children during CPR 100/min 184 (15.2) 12. Ratio of CPR is (single rescuer in the adult) 30:2 179 (14.8) 13. In a newborn, the chest compression and ventilation ra- tio is 3:1 79 (6.5) 14. What does abbreviation AED stands for? Automated External Defibrillator 61 (5.0) 15. What does abbreviation EMS stands for? Emergency Medical Service 188 (15.5) 16. If you and your friend are having food in a canteen and suddenly your friend starts expressing symptoms of choking, what will be your first response? Confirm foreign body aspiration by talking to him 401 (33.1) 17. You are witnessing an infant who suddenly started chok- ing while he was playing with the toy, you have confirmed that he is unable to cry (or) cough, what will be your first re- sponse? Back blows and chest compression of five cycles each, then open the mouth and remove foreign body only when it is seen 210 (17.4) 18. You are witnessing an adult unresponsive victim who has been submerged in fresh water and just removed from it. He has spontaneous breathing, but he is unresponsive. What is the first step? Keep him in recovery position 85 (7.0) 19. You noticed that your colleague has suddenly developed slurring of speech and weakness of right upper limb. Which one of the following can be done? Possibly stroke, he may require thrombolysis, and hence ac- tivate emergency medical services 100 (8.3) 20. You notice a 50-year-old gentleman with retrosternal chest discomfort, profuse sweating, and vomiting. What is next? Probably myocardial infarction, hence activate EMS, give him an aspirin tablet, and allow him to rest 436 (36.0) CPR due to health issues. According to the guideline of the American heart association, if someone does not like to give mouth-to-mouth or is not able to do it, that person should carry out Hands-Only CPR (13). The results demonstrated that only 11.3% of participants knew it. Based on these re- sults, medical students’ awareness of BLS is very low. Samiha Jarrah et al. had done research evaluating awareness and knowledge of BLS, and the results were similar to our study (3). They explained that the rate of knowledge and aware- ness of BLS is low. In another study, Neha Baduni et al. did a research on the knowledge and awareness of BLS among dental practitioners (20). 104 persons had participated in their study, and results showed that none of them had complete awareness regard- ing BLS. Singh et al. conducted a survey among 241 dentists (16). Approximately 53% of them had not participated in any course about CPR or BLS. In our study, none of the responders could answer all ques- tions correctly, and none had received any formal training. The awareness of BSL in infants and children was low among participants. Only 7% of participants knew the correct depth of compression during CPR in children and 6.4% in neonates. Since medical students make up the future of the country’s healthcare system, the results of this study should be taken seriously. This study has shown a need for supplementary BLS training in curricula of Iran’s medical universities. More comprehensive studies could be performed in the future by collaborating with other universities in Iran to evaluate the This open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0). Downloaded from: http://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/aaem M. Akhlaghdoust and et al. 4 awareness of medical sciences students regarding BLS. We suggest some new methods in medical students’ programs for teaching BLS including: VR-based serious games, teach- ing BLS to others, and reinforcing the students’ knowledge and awareness every year. 5. Limitations Our study has some limitations. One of them is that it was conducted only in the four Medical Universities in Tehran and did not involve the whole country. This study only demonstrates and evaluates the awareness, and the knowl- edge and practice regarding BLS was not evaluated in this study. The number of students who completed the survey is not enough to generalize the results to other medical schools in Iran. 6. Conclusion Based on the findings of this study, more than 70% of the studied medical sciences students obtained a low score on BLS awareness. 7. Declarations 7.1. Acknowledgments None. 7.2. Author contribution All authors made substantial contributions, revised the manuscript, and approved the final version for publication. 7.3. Funding sources The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. 7.4. Conflict of interest None to Declare. References 1. Ghanem E, Elgazar M, Oweda K, Tarek H, Assaf F, El- Husseny MWA, et al. Awareness of basic life support among Egyptian medical students; a cross-sectional study. Emergency. 2018;6(1). 2. Saquib SA, Al-Harthi HM, Khoshhal AA, Shaher AA, Al- Shammari AB, Khan A, et al. Knowledge and attitude about basic life support and emergency medical services amongst healthcare interns in university hospitals: a cross-sectional study. Emerg Med Int. 2019;2019. 3. Jarrah S, Judeh M, AbuRuz ME. Evaluation of pub- lic awareness, knowledge and attitudes towards basic life support: a cross-sectional study. BMC Emerg Med. 2018;18(1):1–7. 4. Zaheer H, Haque Z. Students’ Corner-Awareness about BLS (CPR) among medical students: Status and require- ments. J Pak Med Assoc. 2009;59(1):57. 5. Vural M, Koşar MF, Kerimoglu O, Kızkapan F, Kahyaoğlu S, Tuğrul S, et al. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation knowl- edge among nursing students: a questionnaire study. Anatol J Cardiol. 2017;17(2):140. 6. Ziabari SMZ, Kasmaei VM, Khoshgozaran L, Shakiba M. Continuous education of basic life support (BLS) through social media; a quasi-experimental study. Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2019;7(1). 7. Alanazi A, Bin-Hotan AlM, ALhalyabah H, Alanazi A, Al-oraibi S. Community awareness about cardiopul- monary resuscitation among secondary school students in Riyadh. World J Med Sci. 2013;8(3):186e9. 8. Gravesteijn BY, Schluep M, Voormolen DC, van der Burgh AC, Miranda DDR, Hoeks SE, et al. Cost-effectiveness of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation after in- hospital cardiac arrest: A Markov decision model. Resus- citation. 2019;143:150–7. 9. Duff JP, Topjian A, Berg MD, Chan M, Haskell SE, Joyner Jr BL, et al. 2018 American Heart Association focused update on pediatric advanced life support: an update to the American Heart Association guidelines for car- diopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovas- cular care. Circulation. 2018;138(23):e731–9. 10. Alimohammadzadeh K, Akhlaghdoust M, Bahrainian SA, Mirzaei A. Survey on Mental Health of Iranian Medical Students: A Cross-sectional Study in Islamic Azad Uni- versity. Shiraz E-Medical J. 2017;18(7). 11. Sangamesh NC, Vidya KC, Pathi J, Singh A. Awareness, attitude, and knowledge of basic life support among medical, dental, and nursing faculties and students in the university hospital. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2017;7(4):161. 12. Al-Shamiri HM, Al-Maweri SA, Shugaa-Addin B, Alaizari NA, Hunaish A. Awareness of basic life sup- port among Saudi dental students and interns. Eur J Dent. 2017;11(4):521. 13. Powers WJ, Rabinstein AA, Ackerson T, Adeoye OM, Bam- bakidis NC, Becker K, et al. Guidelines for the early man- agement of patients with acute ischemic stroke: 2019 up- date to the 2018 guidelines for the early management of acute ischemic stroke: a guideline for healthcare profes- sionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke . Stroke. 2019;50(12):e344–418. 14. Cheng A, Nadkarni VM, Mancini MB, Hunt EA, Sinz EH, Merchant RM, et al. Resuscitation education science: ed- ucational strategies to improve outcomes from cardiac arrest: a scientific statement from the American Heart This open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0). Downloaded from: http://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/aaem 5 Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine. 2021; 9(1): e40 Association. Circulation. 2018;138(6):e82–122. 15. Krammel M, Schnaubelt S, Weidenauer D, Winnisch M, Steininger M, Eichelter J, et al. Gender and age-specific aspects of awareness and knowledge in basic life support. PLoS One. 2018;13(6):e0198918. 16. Zaheer H, Haque Z. Awareness about BLS (CPR) among medical students: Status and requirements. J Pak Med Assoc. 2009;59(1):57–9. 17. Al-Turki YA, Al-Fraih YS, Jalaly JB, Al-Maghlouth IA, Al- Rashoudi FH, Al-Otaibi AF, et al. Knowledge and at- titudes towards cardiopulmonary resuscitation among university students in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Saudi med J. 2008;29(9):1306–9. 18. Alharbi MM, Horaib YF, Almutairi OM, Alsuaidan BH, Al- ghoraibi MS, Alhadeedi FH, et al. Exploring the extent of knowledge of CPR skills among school teachers in Riyadh, KSA. J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2016;11(5):497–501. 19. ozbilgin S, Akan M, Hancı V, Aygün C, Kuvaki B. Evaluation of public awareness, knowledge and atti- tudes about cardiopulmonary resuscitation: Report of Izmir. Turk Anesteziyoloji ve Reanimasyon Dern Derg. 2015;43(6):396–405. 20. Baduni N, Prakash P, Srivastava D, Sanwal M, Singh B. Awareness of basic life support among den- tal practitioners. Natl J Maxillofac Surg [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2021 Jan 31];5(1):19. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC4178349/?report=abstract 21. Chen M, Wang Y, Li X, Hou L, Wang Y, Liu J, et al. Public knowledge and attitudes towards bystander car- diopulmonary resuscitation in China. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017. 22. Abbas A, Bukhari SI, Ahmad F. Knowledge of first aid and basic life support amongst medical students: a compari- son between trained and un-trained students. J Pak Med Assoc. 2011;61(6):613–6. 23. Irfan B, Zahid I, Khan MS, Khan OAA, Zaidi S, Awan S, et al. Current state of knowledge of basic life sup- port in health professionals of the largest city in Pak- istan: a cross-sectional study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19(1):1–7. This open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0). Downloaded from: http://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/aaem Introduction Methods Results Discussion Limitations Conclusion Declarations References