Emergency. 2017; 5 (1): e24 OR I G I N A L RE S E A RC H Predictive Factors of Survival and 6-Month Favorable Out- come of Very Severe Head Trauma Patients; a Historical Cohort Study Karin Vathanalaoha1, Thakul Oearsakul1, Thara Tunthanathip1∗ 1. Neurosurgical unit, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Songklanagarind Hospital Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand. Received: March 2016; Accepted: July 2016; Published online: 10 January 2017 Abstract: Introduction: Very severe head trauma cases, defined as Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores of less than 6, have a higher mortality rate and poorer outcome. The purpose of this study was to recognize factors associated with survival and 6-month favorable outcome of very severe head trauma patients presenting to emergency depart- ment. Methods: In this historical cohort study, the authors retrospectively reviewed medical records of head trauma patients who were admitted to the emergency department with post-resuscitation GCS scores of less than 6. Both univariate and multivariate analyses were used to test the association between various parameters with survival and 6-month outcome. Results: 103 cases with the mean age of 39 ± 16.5 years were studied (80% male). The overall survival rate was 41.7% and the rate of 6-month favorable outcome was 28.2%. In multivariate analysis, brisk pupil light reaction on admission and patent basal cistern on brain computed tomography (CT) scan were significant factors associated with both survival (OR 5.20, 95% CI 1.57-17.246, p = 0.007 and OR 3.65, 95% CI 1.22-10.91, p=0.02 respectively) and favorable outcome (OR 4.07, 95% CI 1.35-12.24, p=0.01 and OR 3.54, 95% CI 1.22-10.26, p 0.02), respectively. Conclusion: Based on the results of present study, the survival rate of patients with very severe head trauma (GCS < 6) was 41.7%. The strong predictors of survival and 6-month favor- able outcome of these patients were brisk pupillary reactivity and patent cistern on brain CT scan. It seems that very severe head trauma patients still have a reasonable chance to survive and aggressive management should be continued. Keywords: Glasgow coma scale; head injuries, closed; prognosis; treatment outcome; outcome assessment © Copyright (2017) Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences Cite this article as: Vathanalaoha K, Oearsakul Th, Tunthanathip Th. Predictive Factors of Survival and 6-Month Favorable Outcome of Very Severe Head Trauma Patients; a Historical Cohort Study. Emergency. 2017; 5 (1): e24. 1. Introduction Accidents are among the top three causes of death in Thai- land. The incidence rate of traffic accident mortality in Thai- land was 21.61-23.16 per 100,000 people and the trend of mortality gradually increased between 2010 and 2013. Phe- unpathom et al. reported that 15.8-29% of trauma patients in the emergency room had head injuries and the most com- mon mechanism of head injury was road traffic accidents (1). Generally, the severity of head injury was categorized ∗Corresponding Author: Thara Tunthanathip; Neurosurgical Unit, Depart- ment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Hatyai, Songkhla, Thailand, 90112. Phone: +66-85-8203334 Fax: +66-74-429384 Email: tsus4@hotmail.com, tthara@medicine.psu.ac.th into 3 categories using Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores, mild head injury (GCS scores 15-13), moderate head injury (GCS scores 12-9) and severe head injury (GCS scores 8-3). Gennarelli et al. reported that patients with GCS scores of 3 to 5 had a higher mortality rate than patients with GCS scores of 6 to 8 (2). Very severe head injury was defined as cases of head trauma with GCS scores of less than 6 (3) because the high- est mortality rates have been reported 42-87.5% in this group (2-4). These patients were subject to limited use of resources and even treatment in several facilities (3, 5-7). A small num- ber of studies have involved patients with GCS scores <6 and have reported that, <60 years of age, adequate spontaneous respiration, brisk pupillary reactivity, increase in GCS score by at least 2 within 24 hours of admission and the appear- ance of basal cistern on first brain computed tomography (CT) scan were significant predictors of outcome in very se- This open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0). Downloaded from: www.jemerg.com K. Vathanalaoha et al. 2 vere head injury (3-8). The purpose of this study was to rec- ognize factors associated with survival and 6-month favor- able outcome of very severe head trauma patients presenting to emergency department. 2. Methods 2.1. Study design In this historical cohort study, the authors retrospectively re- viewed computer-based medical records of all head trauma patients who were admitted to Songklanagarind Hospital be- tween January 1, 2008 and March 31, 2011. Songklanakarind Hospital is the tertiary care center serving both direct trans- fers from the accident scene and transfer from 14 provinces in the Southern region of Thailand (1). The authors adhered to all principles of Helsinki declaration and confidentiality of patient records during the study period. The Human Re- search Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Songk- lanagarind Hospital, Prince of Songkla University approved the study. 2.2. Participants The patients who had post-resuscitation GCS scores of less than 6, which persisted for at least 6 hours were selected to participate in the present study. However, patients with penetrating mechanism and pediatric cases were excluded. Documented data including the demographic data, mech- anism of injury, physical examination, neurological exam- ination, neurological imaging findings, types of intracra- nial hematoma, treatments, and types of surgery were gath- ered from computer-based medical records by a neurosur- geon. Additionally, the 6-month outcome of injury was doc- umented by telephone call with patient/caregiver. Also, brain CT scans of all patients were assessed regarding intracranial lesions and the appearance of the basal cisterns according to the Marshall classification (9) by a neuro-radiologist. 2.3. Definitions The pupillary reaction to light on admission was classified into 2 groups; the poor pupils group included patients who had sluggish/no reactivity to light on both sides and with any size of pupils, while the brisk pupil/pupils group con- sisted of those who had at least one side of pupil to briskly response to light. Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) was used for outcome measurements. GOS consists of good recov- ery (GR), moderated disability (MR), severe disability (SD), vegetative stage (VS), and death (D) (10). Finally, based on GOS, patients were dichotomized into 2 groups. The favor- able outcome group included GR and MR, while the unfa- vorable outcome group consisted of all others. The Marshall classification categorized brain CT scans into 6 groups us- ing some intracranial features. This system is composed of diffuse injury I (no visible intracranial pathology), diffuse in- jury II (cistern are present with midline shift < 5 mm, and no high/mixed density lesion > 25 cm3), diffuse injury III (basal cisterns compressed or absent with midline shift 0-5 mm, and no high/mixed density lesion > 25 cm3), diffuse injury IV (midline shift > 5 mm, no high/mixed density lesion > 25 cm3 ), evacuated mass (V ) (any lesion surgically evaluated), and non-evacuated mass lesion (VI) (no high/mixed density lesion > 25 cm3 and not surgically evacuated) (9). Motor response is one of the three tests in Glasgow Coma Scale. The motor response is comprised of 6 grades: obeys com- mands (M6), localizes to pain (M5), withdrawal from pain (M4), decorticate posturing (M3), decelerate posturing (M2), and no motor response (M1) (11). 2.4. Statistical analysis All analyses were performed by the R and Epical program 2.9.1 version (12).Mean and standard deviation were cal- culated for descriptive purposes. The Chi-square test and Fisher’s extract test were performed for comparison of di- chotomous parameters between groups. Univariate logistic regression analysis was used to compare the odds of sev- eral parameters to predict the outcome and survival. Finally, multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to adjust the odds to predict outcome and survival of the patients. A p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. 3. Results: 3.1. Demographic data 103 cases with the mean age of 39 ± 16.5 years (range: 16.5- 82) were studied (80% male). Table 1 shows the demographic data and baseline characteristics of the patients. Two-third of patients had GCS 3. The median time of pre-hospital trans- fer was 30 minutes (IQR 20, 90) and pre-hospital hypoxia and hypotension were observed in 17.5% and 44.7%, respectively. Seventy-nine individuals (76.7%) were in poor pupil groups. The median time of injury to brain CT scan was 77.5 minutes (IQR 41.2). The most common brain CT scan findings were subdural hematomas (75.7%), calvarial skull fracture (58.3%), basal skull fracture (59.2%), and basal cistern obliteration (56.3%). Two-third of patients (65.4%) were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) and the remainder were admitted to the trauma (28.2%) or neurosurgical units with intensive care (6.4%). During acute hospitalization, the median length of hospital stay was 9 days (IQR 2, 29 days). Forty-seven individ- uals (45.6%) required emergency surgery and decompressive craniotomy with clot removal was the most common surgical procedure that the patients underwent. This open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0). Downloaded from: www.jemerg.com 3 Emergency. 2017; 5 (1): e24 Figure 1: Classification tree for predictive variables associated with survival. * The number of patients was 101 patients because 2 patients with severe periborbital swelling on both sides could not have their pupils evaluated. Abbrevation; NA: Not availiable. 3.2. Survival rate and outcome The overall survival rate in the present study was 41.7%. Twenty-seven patients (26.2%) observed desirable recovery after acute hospitalization and 2 patients recovered to a fa- vorable group by 6 months after injury. On the other side, sixteen patients (15.6%) were dependent and no patient died during the 6-month follow-up. 3.3. Factors associated with survival rate Table 2 shows the univariate analysis to identify factors asso- ciated with survival rate. The authors found that brisk pupil- lary reactivity, hypotension on admission, hydrocephalus, patent basal cistern, Marshall Classification, and performing operation were factors that associated with survival in uni- variate analysis. Table 3 shows the results of multivariate analysis in this regard. Brisk pupillary reactivity and patent basal cistern on brain CT scan were factors that significantly associated with survival. 3.4. Survival rate and outcome Table 4 shows the univariate analysis to identify factors as- sociated with 6-month favorable outcome. Brisk response to light of pupil or pupils, epidural hematoma thickness less than 1.5 cm, patent basal cistern and Marshall Classification were factors associated with 6-month favorable outcome in univariate analysis. Table 5 reveals the results of multivari- ate logistic analysis in this regard. Accordingly, brisk pupil- lary reactivity and patent basal cistern on brain CT scan had a statistically significant association with 6-month favorable outcome. 3.5. Survival classification tree Figure 1 describes the survival chances of very severe head trauma patients in a classification tree. A higher survival rate was observed in the group with GCS scores of 5 compared to patients with GCS scores of 3-4 when they had similar poor pupil response and obliterated cistern on brain CT scan. 4. Discussion: Based on the results of present study, the survival rate of patients with very severe head trauma (GCS < 6) was 41.7%. The strong predictors of survival and 6-month favorable outcome of these patients were brisk pupillary reactivity and patent cistern on brain CT scans. The use of GCS is a universal method to classify the severity of patients with head injury; patients with GCS scores of 3-4-5 have limited survivability. These patients have poor prognosis. Prior studies reported an overall mortality of 42-87.5% (2-6). In literature, clinical characteristics and imaging findings have been shown to correlate with outcome in the very severe group. Nevertheless, limited numbers of studies have examined the outcomes of patients with GCS scores of 3-5. Bilateral fixed dilated pupils (BFDP) are a significant predictor in concordance with several studies (4, 13-16). Lieberman et al. studied 137 trauma patients with a GCS score of 3. Mortality was 100% in the BFDP group whereas the non-BFDP group had 77% mortality (14). Sakas et al. This open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0). Downloaded from: www.jemerg.com K. Vathanalaoha et al. 4 Table 1: Baseline characteristics of studied patients Characteristic N (%) Sex Male 83 (80.6) Female 20 (19.4) Age (year) 16-20 11 (10.7) 21-40 50 (48.5) 41-60 31 (30.1) >60 11 (10.7) Underlying disease None 83 (80.6) Hypertension 10 (9.9) Neurological 1 (1.0) Gastro enteric 1 (1.0) Respiratory 1 (1.0) Other 5 (4.9) Drug None 92 (92.0) Unidentified drug 3 (3.0) Aspirin 1 (1.0) Other 4 (4.0) Mechanism of trauma Falling 7 (6.8) Vehicle accident 8 (7.8) Motorcycle accident 78 (75.7) Pedestrians 3 (2.9) Body assault 2 (1.9) Other 5 (4.9) Glasgow coma scale 3 64 (62.1) 4 28 (27.2) 5 11 (10.7) Pupillary reactivity* Poor pupils 79 (76.7) Brisk pupil/pupils 22 (21.8) Motor response M1 68 (66.0) M2 24 (23.3) M3 11 (10.7) Hypoxia episode 18 (17.5) Hypotension episode 46 (44.7) Calvarial skull fracture None 42 (40.8) Linear 57 (55.3) Depressed 3 (2.9) Compound 1 (1.0) Basal skull fracture 60 (58.3) Intracranial findings Cerebral contusion 56 (54.4) Intracerebral hemorrhage 48 (46.6) Subdural hemorrhage 78 (75.7) Epidural hemorrhage 19 (18.4) Intraventricular hemorrhage 20 (19.4) Hydrocephalus 17 (16.5) Brainstem hemorrhage 4 (3.9) Appearance of basal cistern Patent 44 (43.1) Obliteration 58 (56.3) Table 1: Baseline characteristics of studied patients (continued) Characteristic N (%) Marshall classification Grade I 5 (4.9) Grade II 19 (18.4) Grade III 32 (31.1) Grade IV 1 (1) Evacuated mass lesion 39 (37.9) Non-evacuated mass lesion 7 (6.8) Operation No 56 (54.4) Craniotomy with clot removal 8 (7.8) Decompressive craniotomy with clot removal 33 (32.0) ICP monitoring 6 (5.8) GOS at discharge Dead 60 (58.3) Vegetative state 12 (11.7) Severe disability 4 (3.9) Moderate disability 16 (15.5) Good recovery 11 (10.7) GOS at 6 months Dead 60 (58.3) Vegetative state 10 (9.7) Severe disability 4 (3.9) Moderate disability 9 (8.7) Good recovery 20 (19.7) Outcome at 6 months Unfavorable (GOS 1-3) 74 (71.8) Favorable (GOS 4-5) 29 (28.2) * 2 patients could not be categorized into groups because of periorbital swelling on both sides. GOS: Glasgow out- come scale. studied 40 trauma patients with BFDP. Mortality was 100% if patients presented any of the following features: surgery 6 or more hours after bilateral loss of pupil reactivity, age more than 65 years, or absent motor response (15). Tien et al. compared trauma patients with a GCS of 3 and BFDP with patients with a GCS score of 3 and reactive pupils. Mortality was 100% versus 42%; hemodynamic instability, midline shift, and herniation were observed in the BFDP patients (4). Generally, the neuronal pathway of pupillary light reflex is located in the intrinsic brainstem. Light re- flex is conducted by optic tract fibers, which synapse in the pretectal area. The pretectal neurons synapse to the Edinger-Westphal complex. Finally, the ciliary nerve serves pupillary constrictor responses (16). Pupillary dilatation and no response to light are caused by a compressed ipsilateral oculomotor nerve and brainstem ischemia. Ritter et al. reported that brain stem blood flow (BBF) was 30.5+/-16.8 ml/100 g/min in BFDP patients whereas it was 43.8+/-18.7 ml/100 g/min (p< 0.001)(17). Therefore, the present study has quite a different classification in pupillary reactivity. Previous studies assessed light reflex of both pupils. We hypothesized that brisk reactivity of either one pupil or both This open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0). Downloaded from: www.jemerg.com 5 Emergency. 2017; 5 (1): e24 Table 2: Associated factors of 6 months survival based on univariate analysis Factor Death Survival OR (95%CI) P Age (year) < 55 47 (78.3) 37 (86.0) Ref 0.32 ≥ 55 13 (21.7) 6 (14.0) 0.58 (0.20-1.69) Sex Male 49 (81.7) 34 (79.1) Ref 0.74 Female 11 (18.3) 9 (20.9) 1.17 (0.44-3.15) Glasgow coma scale 3 40 (66.7) 24 (55.8) Ref 4 16 (26.7) 12 (27.9) 1.25 (0.50-3.08) 0.26 5 4 (6.7) 7 (16.3) 2.91 (0.77-11.01) Pupillary reactivity Poor pupils 53 (89.8) 26 (61.9) Ref 0.001‡ Brisk pupil/pupils 6 (10.2) 16 (38.1) 6.16 (2.22-17.07) Motor response M1 42 (70.0) 26 (60.5) Ref M2 14 (23.3) 10 (23.3) 1.15 (0.44-2.97) 0.28 M3 4 (6.7) 7 (16.3) 2.82 (0.75-10.60) Hypoxia No 47 (78.3) 38 (88.4) Ref 0.18 Yes 13 (21.7) 5 (11.6) 0.49 (0.15-1.43) Hypotension No 27 (45.0) 30 (69.8) Ref 0.01‡ Yes 33 (55.0) 13 (30.2) 0.33 (0.15-0.81) Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) No 32 (53.3) 22 (52.4) Ref 0.92 Yes 28 (46.7) 20 (47.6) 1.03 (0.42-2.28) Contusion No 29 (48.3) 18 (41.9) Ref 0.51 Yes 31 (51.7) 25 (58.1) 1.29 (0.59-2.86) Posterior fossa ICH No 59 (98.3) 40 (95.2) Ref 0.36 Yes 1 (1.7) 2 (4.8) 1.26 (0.11-14.54) Subdural hematoma thick- ness (cm) < 1 41(68.3) 30 (71.4) Ref 0.73 ≥ 1 19 (31.7) 12 (28.6) 0.86 (0.36-2.04) Epidural hematoma thick- ness (cm) < 1.5 58 (96.7) 38 (90.5) Ref 0.19 ≥ 1.5 2 (3.3) 4 (9.5) 3.05 (0.53-17.49) Intraventricular hemorrhage No 45 (75.0) 37 (88.1) Ref 0.10 Yes 15 (25.0) 5 (11.9) 0.40 (0.13-1.22) Hydrocephalus No 46 (76.7) 39 (92.9) Ref 0.03‡ Yes 14 (23.3) 3 (7.1) 0.23 (0.68-0.94) Midline shift (mm) <5 39 (66.1) 27 (64.3) Ref 0.85 ≥ 5 20 (33.9) 15 (35.7) 1.08 (0.42-2.48) Basal cistern appearance Obliteration 40 (66.7) 18 (42.9) Ref 0.01‡ Patent 20 (33.3) 24 (47.1) 2.66 (1.18-6.01) * p value of Chi-square test, † p value of Fisher’s exact test, ‡ Statistical significant. OR: odds ratio, CI: confidence interval. This open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0). Downloaded from: www.jemerg.com K. Vathanalaoha et al. 6 Table 2: Associated factors of 6 months survival based on univariate analysis (continued) Factor Death Survival OR (95%CI) P Brainstem hemorrhage No 58 (96.7) 40 (95.2) Ref 1.45 Yes 2 (3.3) 2 (4.8) 1.45 (0.19-10.72) Operation No 39 (65.0) 17 (39.5) Ref 0.01‡ Yes 21 (35.0) 26 (60.5) 2.84 (1.24-6.28) * p value of Chi-square test, † p value of Fisher’s exact test, ‡ Statistical significant. OR: odds ratio, CI: confidence interval. Table 3: Associated factors of 6 months survival based on multivariate analysis Variable OR (95%CI) P Pupillary reactivity Poor pupils Ref 0.007 Brisk pupil/pupils 5.20 (1.57-17.26) Basal cistern appearance Obliteration Ref 0.02 Patent 3.65 (1.22-10.91) Hypotension No Ref 0.63 Yes 1.31 (0.42-4.07) Hydrocephalus No Ref 0.82 Yes 1.18 (0.26-5.29) Operation No Ref 0.36 Yes 0.58 (0.18-1.86) OR: odds ratio; CI: confident interval. pupils is sufficient to indicate the function of the brainstem. In addition, we found that only one pupil showing good response to light directly related to the chance of survival and favorable outcome. In our study, another factor, the appearance of basal cistern on brain CT scan, has been determined to correlate with survival and outcome. Absence of obliterated basal cistern had an independent association with survival and good outcome. Toutant et al. studied 218 patients with severe head injury and found a strong rela- tionship between mortality rate and death. In detail, death rate in patients with compressed cisterns was approximately twice as high compared with normal cistern (39% and 22%, respectively) (18). On the other hand, Mauritz et al. investi- gated outcomes of very severe head injury cases that had a GCS score of 3. The opening cistern on the first brain CT scan was one potential predictor of survival and good functional recovery (13). The strength of the present study includes more detailed assessment of statistically significant factors affecting survival such as pupillary reactivity. However, the present study has limitations including retrospective study design and assessment of early outcome. Firstly, the quality of data and bias may be affected by study design. The sec- ond limitation is only assessing early outcome. Long-term outcome is an uncommon aspect to assess in these patients. Interestingly, late outcome assessment of survivors who had very severe head injuries in other studies has shown that physical and psychological impairment remains in many cases (19). For studying clinical implications, we suggest a prospective study design for better data quality. Long-term outcome assessment should also be considered in the future. It seems that very severe head trauma patients still have a reasonable chance to survive and management should be continued. The results of this study may guide physicians to decide whether to continue treatment in patients or not. 5. Conclusion: Based on the results of present study, the survival rate of pa- tients with very severe head trauma (GCS < 6) was 41.7%. The strong predictors of survival and 6-month favorable outcome of these patients were brisk pupillary reactivity and patent cistern on brain CT scan. It seems that very severe head trauma patients still have a reasonable chance to survive and management should be continued. This open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0). Downloaded from: www.jemerg.com 7 Emergency. 2017; 5 (1): e24 Table 4: Associated factors of 6 months favorable outcome based on univariate analysis Factor Unfavorable Favorable OR (95%CI) P Age (year) < 55 58 (78.4) 26 (89.7) Ref 0.26 † ≥ 55 16 (21.6) 3 (10.3) 0.41 (0.11-1.56) Sex Male 58 (78.4) 25 (86.2) Ref 0.36 Female 16 (21.6) 4 (13.8) 0.58 (0.17-1.91) GCS 3 48 (64.9) 16 (55.2) Ref 4 19 (25.7) 9 (31.0) 1.42 (0.53-3.76) 0.63 5 7 (9.5) 4 (13.8) 1.71 (0.44-6.62) Pupillary reactivity Poor pupils 64 (87.7) 15 (53.6) Ref 0.001‡ Brisk pupil/pupils 9 (12.3) 13 (46.4) 6.2 (2.22-17.07) Motor response M1 51 (68.9) 17 (58.6) Ref M2 16 (21.6) 8 (27.6) 1.50 (0.54-4.12) 0.60 M3 7 (9.5) 4 (13.8) 1.71 0.44-6.58) Hypoxia No 60 (81.1) 25 (86.2) Ref 0.53 Yes 14 (18.9) 4 (13.8) 0.68 (0.25-2.28) Hypotension No 39 (52.7) 18 (62.1) Ref 0.59 Yes 35 (47.3) 11 (37.9) 0.68 (0.28-1.63) Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) No 41 (56.2) 13 (44.8) Ref 0.30 Yes 32 (43.8) 16 (55.2) 1.57 (0.66-3.74) Contusion No 36 (48.6) 11 (37.9) Ref 0.32 Yes 38 (51.4) 18 (62.1) 1.55 (0.64-3.72) Posterior fossa ICH No 71 (97.3) 28 (96.6) Ref 0.84* Yes 2 (2.7) 1 (3.4) 1.3 (0.11-14.54) Subdural hemorrhage thick- ness (cm) < 1 49 (66.2) 22 (78.6) Ref 0.22 ≥ 1 25 (33.8) 6 (21.4) 0.5 (0.19-1.48) Epidural hemorrhage thick- ness (cm) < 1.5 72 (97.3) 24 (85.7) Ref 0.02‡ ≥ 1.5 2 (2.7) 4 (14.3) 6.0 (1.03-34.84) Intraventricular hemorrhage No 57 (77.0) 25 (89.3) Ref 0.16 Yes 17 (23.0) 3 (10.7) 0.40 (0.10-1.49) Hydrocephalus No 60 (81.1) 25 (89.3) Ref 0.18 Yes 14 (18.9) 3 (10.7) 0.51 (0.13-1.94) Midline shift (mm) <5 46 (62.2) 22 (75.9) Ref 0.18 ≥ 5 28 (37.8) 7 (24.1) 0.52 (0.19-1.38) Basal cistern appearance Obliteration 49 (66.2) 9 (32.1) Ref 0.02‡ Patent 25 (33.8) 19 (67.9) 4.1 (1.6-10.5) * p value of Chi-square test, † p value of Fisher’s exact test, ‡ Statistical significant. OR: odds ratio, CI: confidence interval. This open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0). Downloaded from: www.jemerg.com K. Vathanalaoha et al. 8 Table 4: Associated factors of 6 months favorable outcome based on univariate analysis (continued) Factor Unfavorable Favorable OR (95%CI) P Brainstem hemorrhage No 71 (95.9) 27 (96.4) Ref 0.91 Yes 3 (4.1) 1 (3.6) 0.87 (0.08-8.79) Operation No 40 (54.1) 16 (55.2) Ref 0.98 Yes 34 (45.9) 13 (44.8) 0.95 (0.40-2.26) *p value of Chi-square test, † p value of Fisher’s exact test, ‡ Statistical significant. OR: odds ratio, CI: confidence interval. Table 5: Associated factors of 6 months favorable outcome based on multivariate analysis Variable OR (95%CI) p value Pupillary reactivity Poor pupils Ref 0.01 Brisk pupil/pupils 4.07(1.35-12.24) Basal cistern appearance Obliteration Ref 0.02 Patent 3.54 (1.22-10.26) Epidural hematoma thickness (cm) <1.5 Ref 0.13 ≥ 1.5 4.46 (0.64-31.15) OR: odds ratio; CI: confident interval. 6. Appendix 6.1. Acknowledgements The authors would like to offer their special thanks to Dr. Nuttha Sanghan for brain CT scan assessments. 6.2. Author’s contribution All authors passed four criteria for authorship contribution based on recommendations of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. 6.3. Conflict of interest None. 6.4. Funding and supports: The authors declare that they have no affiliations with or in- volvement in any organization or entity with any financial in- terest. References 1. Phuenpathom N, Tiensuwan M, Ratanalert S, Saeheng S, Sripairojkul B. The changing pattern of head injury in Thailand. Journal of clinical neuroscience. 2000;7(3):223- 5. 2. Gennarelli TA, Spielman GM, Langfitt TW, Gildenberg PL, Harrington T, Jane JA, et al. Influence of the type of in- tracranial lesion on outcome from severe head injury: a multicenter study using a new classification system. Journal of neurosurgery. 1982;56(1):26-32. 3. Jain S, Dharap SB, Gore MA. Early prediction of outcome in very severe closed head injury. Injury. 2008;39(5):598- 603. 4. Tien HC, Cunha JR, Wu SN, Chughtai T, Tremblay LN, Brenneman FD, et al. Do trauma patients with a Glas- gow Coma Scale score of 3 and bilateral fixed and dilated pupils have any chance of survival? Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. 2006;60(2):274-8. 5. Quigley MR, Vidovich D, Cantella D, Wilberger JE, Ma- roon JC, Diamond D. Defining the limits of survivor- ship after very severe head injury. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. 1997;42(1):7-10. 6. Demetriades D, Kuncir E, Velmahos GC, Rhee P, Alo K, Chan LS. Outcome and prognostic factors in head in- juries with an admission Glasgow Coma Scale score of 3. Archives of Surgery. 2004;139(10):1066-8. 7. Chaudhuri K, Malham GM, Rosenfeld JV. Survival of trauma patients with coma and bilateral fixed dilated pupils. Injury. 2009;40(1):28-32. 8. Brazinova A, Mauritz W, Leitgeb J, Wilbacher I, Majdan M, Janciak I, et al. Outcomes of patients with severe trau- matic brain injury who have Glasgow Coma Scale scores of 3 or 4 and are over 65 years old. Journal of neuro- trauma. 2010;27(9):1549-55. This open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0). Downloaded from: www.jemerg.com 9 Emergency. 2017; 5 (1): e24 9. Marshall L, Marshall SB, Klauber M, Van Berkum CM, Eisenberg H, Jane J, et al. The diagnosis of head injury requires a classification based on computed axial tomog- raphy. Journal of neurotrauma. 1992;9:S287. 10. Jennett B, Bond M. Assessment of outcome after se- vere brain damage: a practical scale. The Lancet. 1975;305(7905):480-4. 11. Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment of coma and im- paired consciousness: a practical scale. The Lancet. 1974;304(7872):81-4. 12. Free software of the R-Project group from the De- partment of Statistics and Mathematics of the Vienna University of Economics and Business Administration [cited 2006 1 March]. Available from: https://www.r- project.org/. 13. Mauritz W, Leitgeb J, Wilbacher I, Majdan M, Janciak I, Brazinova A, et al. Outcome of brain trauma patients who have a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 3 and bilateral fixed and dilated pupils in the field. European Journal of Emer- gency Medicine. 2009;16(3):153-8. 14. Lieberman JD, Pasquale MD, Garcia R, Cipolle MD, Li PM, Wasser TE. Use of admission Glasgow Coma Score, pupil size, and pupil reactivity to determine outcome for trauma patients. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. 2003;55(3):437-43. 15. Sakas DE, Bullock MR, Teasdale GM. One-year outcome following craniotomy for traumatic hematoma in pa- tients with fixed dilated pupils. Journal of neurosurgery. 1995;82(6):961-5. 16. Hultborn H, Mori K, Tsukahara N. The neuronal path- way subserving the pupillary light reflex. Brain Research. 1978;159(2):255-67. 17. Ritter AM, Muizelaar JP, Barnes T, Choi S, Fatouros P, Ward J, et al. Brain stem blood flow, pupillary response, and outcome in patients with severe head injuries. Neu- rosurgery. 1999;44(5):941-8. 18. Toutant SM, Klauber MR, Marshall LF, Toole BM, Bowers SA, Seelig JM, et al. Absent or compressed basal cisterns on first CT scan: ominous predictors of outcome in se- vere head injury. Journal of neurosurgery. 1984;61(4):691- 4. 19. Thomsen IV. Late outcome of very severe blunt head trauma: a 10-15 year second follow-up. Journal of Neu- rology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 1984;47(3):260-8. This open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0). Downloaded from: www.jemerg.com Introduction Methods Results: Discussion: Conclusion: Appendix References