Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine. 2022; 10(1): e20 OR I G I N A L RE S E A RC H Skin Cooling to Reduce the Pain Associated with Local Anesthetic Injection; a Randomized Controlled Trial Saeed Majidinejad1, Farhad Heidari1, Amirhosein Famil Chitgarian1∗ 1. Department of Emergency Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran. Received: January 2022; Accepted: February 2022; Published online: 10 March 2022 Abstract: Introduction: Different methods have been proposed for the reduction of the pain caused by the injection of lo- cal anesthetics. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of skin cooling on reduction of pain associated with local injection of lidocaine buffered with sodium bicarbonate. Methods: This randomized controlled trial included 108 adult patients with arm/forearm wounds who referred to the emergency departments. Participants were randomly allocated to two equal groups. Patients in both groups received subcutaneous injection of buffered lidocaine. In the intervention group, an ice cube measuring 2 × 2 × 2 cm (at 0 ◦ C) in sterile gloves was placed on the wound for 2 minutes before the injection of buffered lidocaine. The primary outcome was severity of pain during lidocaine injection using a visual analog scale (VAS). Results: One hundred and eight patients were enrolled in the study, 54 in each group. There was no statistically significant difference in age (p = 0.777), sex (p = 0.466), and length of laceration (p = 0.410) between the two groups. The pain scores during lidocaine injec- tion were significantly lower in the intervention group compared to control group (2.39 ± 1.14 vs 4.26 ± 0.94, p < 0.001). Conclusion: Skin cooling prior to the injection of local anesthetics can significantly reduce the pain caused by local anesthetic infiltration Keywords: Lidocaine; Wounds and Injuries; Injections; Anesthesia, Local; Pain; Emergency Service, Hospital Cite this article as: Majidinejad S, Heidari F, Famil Chitgarian A. Skin Cooling to Reduce the Pain Associated with Local Anesthetic Injection; a Randomized Controlled Trial. Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2022; 10(1): e20. https://doi.org/10.22037/aaem.v10i1.1562. 1. Introduction Primary repair of wounds is usually performed in the emer- gency department (ED). Wounds of arms/forearms can occur frequently since the upper extremities are quite often used to ward off serious injuries. The skin of arm/forearm is thin, with densely distributed nociceptors resulting in the lower threshold of pain in these areas; therefore, even uncompli- cated surgical procedures such as suturing of simple lacera- tions may require subcutaneous injection of local anesthetics (1, 2). Lidocaine, as the most popular anesthetic agent, is used to al- leviate procedural pain, but paradoxically it can cause pain or discomfort during subcutaneous injection (3-5). For patients undergoing minor surgery such as wound repair, it is often the lidocaine injection that is the most painful part of proce- dure (2, 3). Administration of local anesthesia for wound re- ∗Corresponding Author: Amirhosein Famil Chitgarian; Department of Emergency Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran. Email: amirchitgarian@gmail.com, Tel: 00989185479835, ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3687-7176. pair appears to be the seventh most uncomfortable ED pro- cedure (2). Various methods have been used for relieving the pain caused by local anesthetics injection in previous studies, including warming lidocaine or mixing it with sodium bicar- bonate (3). Buffering with sodium bicarbonate or warming will reduce the shelf life of lidocaine from 14 to 7 days, re- quiring additional equipment for storage (2, 3). Cooling has been used for analgesia and pain management (6). Ice cubes and cooling sprays have been reported to effec- tively reduce the pain caused by arterial or venous punctures (7, 8). Pain alleviation for bruises, fractures, bites, sports in- juries, sprains, and burns has been achieved with this tech- nique as well (9). Cryotherapy has also been demonstrated to be effective for postoperative pain management when ap- plied preoperatively (10, 11). Pre-cooling for pain reduction in dental procedures is also well described (12). Preemptive cryotherapy for relieving the pain caused by sub- cutaneous injection of lidocaine for the repair of simple lac- erations has shown to be effective in wounds occurring in dif- ferent parts of the body, including upper and lower extrem- ities, trunk, and face (2). This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of skin cooling on the reduction of pain asso- This open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0). Downloaded from: http://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/aaem S. Majidinejad et al. 2 ciated with local injection of lidocaine buffered with sodium bicarbonate. 2. Methods 2.1. Study design and setting This prospective randomized controlled trial was con- ducted in the emergency department (ED) of Alzahra and Kashani Hospitals in Isfahan, Iran, in 2021. The Ethics Committee of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences (IR.MUI.MED.REC.1398.278) approved the study protocol and it complies with the statements of the Declaration of Helsinki. The trial was registered in the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials under the number IRCT20180129038549N14. All patients provided written informed consent for participa- tion in the study. 2.2. Participants All adult patients with acute arm/forearm wounds referred to the ED were enrolled in the study. Inclusion criteria were 18- 70 years of age, superficial wound/laceration of arm/forearm (a laceration not involving the fascia or muscle and requiring a one-layer suture), wound surface area ≤5 cm2, being alert, and willing to participate in the study. Patients with visual, mental, or verbal disorders, multiple trauma, unstable vital sign, a history of peripheral neuropathy, and a history of an allergic reaction to local anesthetics were excluded. Patients experiencing agitation or irritability caused by cooling during the study were also excluded. 2.3. Interventions Then patients were divided into two equal groups (interven- tion group and control group) using the Random Allocation software and simple random sampling method. In the inter- vention group, an ice cube measuring 2 × 2 × 2 cm (at 0 ◦ C) in sterile gloves was placed on the wound for 2 minutes and then buffered lidocaine injection was performed. In the control group, no ice cube was used before injecting buffered lidocaine. Patients in both groups received approximately 10 ml of buffered lidocaine that were fitted with 27-guage needles. 1% lidocaine hydrochloride mixed with 8.4% Sodium bicarbon- ate with a ratio of 9 to 1 was used for this study. Since the buffered solution has increased pH, its half-life in room tem- perature decreases; therefore, the solution was made right before the injection. The buffered lidocaine was injected by an assistant who was blinded to the allocation. Immediately after injection, each patient was asked to rate the pain using the visual analogue scale (VAS) from 0 to 10 by marking a vertical line (0: no pain, 10: the worst possi- ble pain imaginable). In the beginning of the study, patient characteristics (age and sex) and length of the laceration were recorded. All measurements and data gathering were per- formed by investigators blinded to randomization. 2.4. Data analysis The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) soft- ware (version 25.0, Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.) was used for data analysis. Mean, standard deviation, frequency, and percent- ages were used to describe the results. The chi-squared test was used to compare sex distribution between groups. Inde- pendent t-test was used to compare age and pain scores be- tween groups. P-values ≤0.05 were regarded as statistically significant. The sample size was determined as at least 54 participants in each group using the formula for comparison of two means with α=0.05, β=0.2, δ1=3.5, δ2=7, µ1=2, and µ2=5 based on the mean of pain scores in two groups form the study by Song et al. (2). 3. Results A total of 198 patients were evaluated, 108 of whom were in- cluded in the analysis; 54 patients in the intervention group, and 54 patients in the control group (Figure 1). The mean age was 43.95±13.14 (19-68 years) years (80.6% male). There was no statistically significant difference regarding age (p = 0.777), sex (p = 0.466) and length of laceration (p = 0.410) be- tween the two groups (Table 1). The pain scores during lidocaine injection were significantly lower in the intervention group compared to control group (2.39 ± 1.14 vs 4.26 ± 0.94, p < 0.001). No wound complica- tions occurred in either group. Shivering was observed in 2 patients in the intervention group who did not need treat- ment. 4. Discussion Based on the findings of the present study; skin cooling prior to the injection of local anesthetics can significantly reduce the pain caused by local anesthetic infiltration. Local anes- thetic injection is regarded as one of the most painful compo- nents of minor procedures such as superficial wound repair (2-4). The health care providers’ efforts to effectively con- trol pain have been associated with improved patient out- comes, and it is important to find strategies to reduce all pain-related elements of the procedure (13). Pain and anx- iety are thought to prevent some patients from receiving any care, including local anesthetic injections (11). There are sev- eral factors that can reduce the pain caused by the anesthesia itself and increase patient satisfaction, including selection of the most appropriate solution, proper preparation of the so- lution, careful selection of the required equipment, prepara- tion of the site of injection, and procedural techniques (14). This study demonstrated that local pre-cooling with ice cube This open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0). Downloaded from: http://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/aaem 3 Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine. 2022; 10(1): e20 Table 1: Comparing the baseline characteristics of studied cases between groups Variables Skin cooling (n=54) Control (n=54) P-value Sex Male 42 (77.8) 45 (83.3) 0.466 Female 12 (22.2) 9 (16.7) Age (years) Mean ± SD 44.31 ± 12.97 43.59 ± 13.41 0.777 Laceration size (cm) Mean ± SD 3.72 ± 0.25 3.95 ± 0.33 0.410 Pain severity* Mean ± SD 2.39 ± 1.14 4.26 ± 0.94 <0.001 Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation or frequency (%). *Based on VAS, visual analogue scale. Figure 1: CONSORT flow diagram of the study. can significantly reduce the pain associated with local anes- thetic injection. Similarly, Song et al. showed that the me- dian of subjective numeric rating (0-10 scale) was signifi- cantly lower in the cryotherapy group compared to the con- trol group (2). Their study was comparable with ours in many aspects including the purpose of local anesthetic injection, the tool used for evaluation of the perceived pain, and the type of local anesthetic. Nevertheless, they assessed the ef- This open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0). Downloaded from: http://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/aaem S. Majidinejad et al. 4 fect of pre-cooling on local anesthetic injection pain at differ- ent sites while we only included patients with arm/forearm wounds. Mahshidfar et al., in their study on patients with superficial lacerations, showed that cooling the injection site prior to local anesthetic injection can significantly reduce the pain and discomfort caused by the injection (5). Their results are consistent with the results of the present study. Soft tissue cooling has also been found to help decrease pain during injection of local anesthetics in children for dental procedures (15). Furthermore, cryotherapy has been shown to be effective for pain reduction in many surgical fields in- cluding obstetrics, ophthalmology, orthopedics, otorhino- laryngology, and plastic surgery (9-11). A previous study showed that cryo-analgesia with ice cubes was effective in reducing the pain of local anesthetic infiltration for eyelid surgery (9). It is not clear exactly how cooling reduces this pain, but it is thought that vasoconstriction and reduced nerve conduc- tion may play an important role (2, 16-19). Generally, non- myelinated C fibers and myelinated A-delta fibers are re- sponsible for rapid transmission of pain. Since pain trans- mission consists of a set of electrochemical reactions and all chemical reactions are slowed down at lower tempera- tures, nerve conduction velocity can decrease with reduced tissue temperature. In fact, signal conduction through A- delta fibers stops at 10◦C (6). Hence, cooling would pro- vide analgesia by decreasing nerve conduction and increas- ing pain threshold (10, 16). Other underlying mechanisms of cryotherapy that may contribute to pain reduction are reduced inflammation, decreased oxygen demand, limited production of free radicals, and preventing neural plasticity through reducing free nerve ending sensitivity (17, 18). 5. Limitation A limitation of the current study may be the injection of buffered lidocaine instead of lidocaine alone, because adding sodium bicarbonate to lidocaine has been demonstrated to significantly reduce pain from anesthetic injection based on the belief that the acidity of lidocaine is responsible for the pain caused during its local injection (2). Therefore, the ap- plication of buffered lidocaine may have decreased the true effect of pre-cooling. Because of the nature of the interven- tions, blinding of patients was not possible. Evaluation of pain severity via a subjective method (VAS) can be consid- ered as a limitation of the present study. 6. Conclusion According to the results of the current study, pre-cooling ap- proximately 2 minutes prior to the injection of the local anes- thesia with lidocaine, buffered with sodium bicarbonate, in arm/forearm wounds can reduce the pain caused by injec- tion. However, further studies with larger sample sizes are required to confirm the findings of the current study. 7. List of abbreviations • ED: emergency department • VAS: visual analogue scale 8. Declarations 8.1. Acknowledgments We would like to express our sincere gratitude towards the personnel of the emergency departments of Alzahra and Kashani Hospitals, Isfahan, Iran. 8.2. Authors’ contributions S.M., F.H., and A.F.C.; Contributed to conception, study de- sign, and data collection and evaluation. F.H. and A.F.C.; Contributed to statistical analysis, and interpretation of data. F.H. and A.F.C.; Drafted the manuscript, which was revised by S.M.. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. 8.3. Funding This study was financially supported by Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. 8.4. Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests. 8.5. Availability of data and materials The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. References 1. Eshkevari L, Trout KK, Damore J. Management of postpartum pain. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2013;58(6):622-31. 2. Song J, Kim H, Park E, Ahn JH, Yoon E, Lampotang S, et al. Pre-emptive ice cube cryotherapy for reducing pain from local anaesthetic injections for simple lacerations: a ran- domised controlled trial. Emerg Med J. 2018;35(2):103-7. 3. Finsen V. Reduced pain when injecting lidocaine. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2017;137(9):629-30. 4. Azizkhani R, Sani MS. Topical Lidocaine plus Diclofenac as a Local Anesthetic Agent in Central Venous Catheter- ization; a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2021;9(1):e63. 5. Mahshidfar B, Shevi SC, Abbasi M, Kasnavieh MH, Rezai M, Zavereh M, et al. Ice Reduces Needle-Stick Pain Asso- This open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0). Downloaded from: http://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/aaem 5 Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine. 2022; 10(1): e20 ciated With Local Anesthetic Injection. Anesth Pain Med. 2016;6(5):e38293. 6. Trescot AM. Cryoanalgesia in interventional pain man- agement. Pain Physician. 2003;6(3):345-60. 7. Hijazi R, Taylor D, Richardson J. Effect of topical alkane vapocoolant spray on pain with intravenous cannulation in patients in emergency departments: randomised dou- ble blind placebo controlled trial. BMJ. 2009;338. 8. Bastami M, Azadi A, Mayel M. The Use of Ice Pack for Pain Associated with Arterial Punctures. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015;9(8):JC07-9. 9. Goel S, Chang B, Bhan K, El-Hindy N, Kolli S. “Cryoanal- gesic preparation” before local anaesthetic injection for lid surgery. Orbit. 2006;25(2):107-10. 10. Watkins AA, Johnson TV, Shrewsberry AB, Nourparvar P, Madni T, Watkins CJ, et al. Ice packs reduce postopera- tive midline incision pain and narcotic use: a random- ized controlled trial. J Am Coll Surg. 2014;219(3):511-7. 11. Gostimir M, Hussain A. A systematic review and meta- analysis of methods for reducing local anesthetic injec- tion pain among patients undergoing periocular surgery. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019;35(2):113-25. 12. Bhadauria US, Sandesh N, MISHRA P, GODHA S. Effect of injection site pre-cooling on pain perception in patients attending a dental camp at life line express: a split mouth interventional study. Clujul Med. 2017;90(2):220. 13. Patel BK, Wendlandt BN, Wolfe KS, Patel SB, Doman ER, Pohlman AS, et al. Comparison of two lidocaine ad- ministration techniques on perceived pain from bed- side procedures: a randomized clinical trial. Chest. 2018;154(4):773-80. 14. Strazar AR, Leynes PG, Lalonde DH. Minimizing the pain of local anesthesia injection. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132(3):675-84. 15. Bose S, Garg N, Pathivada L, Yeluri R. Cooling the soft tis- sue and its effect on perception of pain during infiltration and block anesthesia in children undergoing dental pro- cedures: a comparative study. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2019;13(3):159. 16. Yoon WY, Chung SP, Lee HS, Park YS. Analgesic pretreat- ment for antibiotic skin test: vapocoolant spray vs ice cube. Am J Emerg Med. 2008;26(1):59-61. 17. Nadler SF, Weingand K, Kruse RJ. The physiologic ba- sis and clinical applications of cryotherapy and ther- motherapy for the pain practitioner. Pain physician. 2004;7(3):395-400. 18. Muldoon J. Skin cooling, pain and chronic wound healing progression. Br J Community Nurs. 2006;11(Sup1):S21-S5. 19. East CE, Dorward ED, Whale RE, Liu J. Local cool- ing for relieving pain from perineal trauma sus- tained during childbirth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;10(10):CD006304. This open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0). Downloaded from: http://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/aaem Introduction Methods Results Discussion Limitation Conclusion List of abbreviations Declarations References