Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine. 2022; 10(1): e26 OR I G I N A L RE S E A RC H Potential Impact of 3% Hypertonic Saline Infusion on Tra- madol Poisoning-Induced Electrocardiogram Changes; a Randomized Clinical Trial Ali Omraninava1, Ahmad Mehdizade1, Ebrahim Karimi1∗, Amir Ghabousian2 1. Emergency Department, Besat Hospital, AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. 2. Road Traffic Injury Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran. Received: February 2022; Accepted: March 2022; Published online: 13 April 2022 Abstract: Introduction: Tramadol is a synthetic analgesic with weak mu-opioid receptor agonist activity. Tramadol over- dose is associated with adverse cardiac effects due to inhibiting cardiac Na+ and K+ channels. This study aimed to investigate the potential ameliorative role of 3% hypertonic saline on the electrocardiogram (ECG) changes in patients presenting with tramadol poisoning. Methods: This was a single-center, controlled, randomized, single-blind clinical trial. Patients were randomized into the case (received hypertonic saline) and control (re- ceived placebo) groups. ECG was obtained twice in each group (upon arrival and following the intervention). Response to therapeutic interventions was evaluated using Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test. Results: A total of 76 patients were included. The mean age of patients was 24.88 ± 4.29 years, and 62 (81.6%) were male. The mean ingested dose of tramadol was 1673.68 ± 608.85 (range: 550-2750) mg. The number needed to treat and the absolute risk reduction of 3% hypertonic saline in the treatment of wide QRS were 1 (95% CI: 1.00 – 1.00) and 100%, respectively. In the treatment of long QTc, these measures were 1.9 (95%CI: 1.2 – 4.5) and 53.85% (95%CI: 22.00 – 85.69), respectively. Conclusion: Given that hypertonic saline infusion can significantly amelio- rate tramadol-mediated ECG changes, including QRS prolongation and QT lengthening, it can be regarded as a potential therapeutic strategy to prevent the development of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias caused by tramadol toxicity. Keywords: Poisoning; tramadol; saline solution; infusions, intravenous Cite this article as: Omraninava A, Mehdizade A, Karimi E, Ghabousian A. Potential Impact of 3% Hypertonic Saline Infusion on Tramadol Poisoning-Induced Electrocardiogram Changes; a Randomized Clinical Trial. Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2022; 10(1): e26. https://doi.org/10.22037/aaem.v10i1.1567. 1. Introduction Tramadol is a synthetic analgesic with weak mu-opioid re- ceptor agonist activity and is commonly used to mitigate moderate to severe pain (1). It is well-established that tra- madol hinders the reuptake of several neurotransmitters, including serotonin and norepinephrine (2). Even though tramadol has illustrated a low risk for dependence and abuse compared to other opioids, the incidence of tramadol- mediated toxicity and its complications have been on the rise over the past decades (3). Tramadol poisoning can ad- ∗Corresponding Author: Ebrahim Karimi; Emergency Department, Besat Hospital, Afsariyeh Avenue, Basij Highway, Tehran Iran. Tel: +989124544838, Email: ebrahimkarimi86@gmail.com, ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002- 3542-9099. versely affect multiple organs throughout the body. One of the most fearsome ramifications of tramadol toxicity is its catastrophic impact upon cardiac action potential (4). Ac- cording to the available studies, at high doses, tramadol can interfere with cardio-myocyte depolarization and repolariza- tion via inhibiting voltage-gated Na+ and delayed rectifier K+ channels, respectively (5). Electrocardiogram (ECG) findings in patients with tramadol poisoning are mainly consistent with the Na+ channel blockade activity (6). The mainstay of tramadol toxicity treatment is general sup- portive care and possible seizure management (7). However, there is a lack of evidence with regard to reversing poten- tially life-threatening ECG changes in this regard. The use of hypertonic saline (HS) with the aim of sodium loading has been identified as a potential alternative method to sodium bicarbonate use in patients with tricyclic antidepressants This open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0). Downloaded from: http://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/aaem A. Omraninava et al. 2 (TCA) intoxication, which also associates with Na+ channel blockade (8). However, the impact of hypertonic saline on tramadol-induced ECG abnormalities has never been stud- ied. This study aimed to investigate the potential impact of 3% HS on the ECG changes and associated complications in patients presenting with tramadol poisoning. 2. Methods 2.1. Study design and setting This is a controlled, randomized, single-blind clinical trial in- tending to evaluate the potential therapeutic role of 3% HS in ameliorating ECG changes and associated complications followed by tramadol toxicity. The study was conducted on patients presenting to Besat General Hospital, Tehran, Iran, from March through October 2021. The local ethics commit- tee (Biomedical Research Ethics Committee) approved the protocol of present study (IR.AJAUMS.REC.1400.126) and it was registered in Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT: 20220213054017N1) Written informed consent was obtained from patients or their next of kin and researchers acted solely based on the Helsinki Declaration. 2.2. Participants Tramadol poisoned cases with at least one of the following ECG abnormalities were included: right bundle brunch block (RBBB), long QTc, Tall R wave, prolonged QRS interval, and right axis deviation. These parameters were selected based on the available data regarding the ECG manifestations of Na+ and K+ channel blockers (9, 10). Patients not willing to participate, those under 18 years of age, pregnant women, and patients with underlying cardiovascular disorders, in- cluding heart failure and cardiomyopathy, patients on antiar- rhythmic or arrhythmogenic drugs, and those with liver fail- ure, electrolyte disturbance (hypo- and hypernatremia), and chronic kidney disease, were excluded from the present study (Figure 1). 2.3. Data gathering and therapeutic interven- tion The demographic characteristics (age and sex), medical his- tory, physical findings upon arrival, drug dosage, and rel- evant complications (seizure, falling, shoulder dislocation, head trauma, and loss of consciousness) were gathered us- ing a predesigned checklist. Eligible patients were randomly allocated to either case (intervention) or control (placebo) group using a simple randomization method. All patients were treated according to the current standard of care for acute tramadol poisoning. Patients in the control group, re- ceived 3 ml/kg (maximum dose:150 ml) of 3% dextrose wa- ter over 20 minutes as a placebo. However, patients in the intervention group received the intravascular infusion of 3% hypertonic saline (3 ml/kg over 20 minutes; maximum dose: 150 ml) in addition to the standard of care. ECG was ob- tained twice in each group (upon arrival and after complet- ing the intervention). A 12-lead ECG was acquired by a reg- istered nurse under the supervision of a senior emergency medicine resident using a Carewell Digital 12-channel ECG- 1112M electrocardiograph. The interpretation of ECG was carried out by a cardiologist blinded to the study protocol. To this end, heart rate, QRS axis (normal between -30 to +100), QRS duration (normal< 110 ms), QTc interval (normal<0.44 ms), bundle branch block, and the presence of dominant R wave in aVR (R wave height greater than 3 mm or R/S ratio more than 0.7) were documented. Right bundle branch block (RBBB), long QTc, Tall R wave, wide QRS, and axis deviation were the studied ECG abnormalities. 2.4. Outcomes The primary outcome of the current study was the effects of 3% HS on ECG changes and the secondary outcome was its effect on other complications of tramadol poisoning. 2.5. Statistical analysis The study analyses were performed using IBM®SPSS®Statistics 26. Normal distribution was assessed using Kolmogorov-Smirnov method. Data were presented as mean ± standard deviation or frequency (%). Taking into account normality, we used Independent-Samples T-Test and Mann-Whitney U Test to compare quantitative characteristics between the two groups, while we employed Chi-Square test for qualitative ones. Response to therapeutic intervention was evaluated using Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test. In any case, we considered p-value less than 0.05 as significant. 3. Results 3.1. Baseline characteristics of studied cases A total of 76 patients with tramadol intoxication and ECG ab- normality were enrolled during this clinical trial and were included in final analysis. The mean age of patients was 24.88 ± 4.29 years, and 62 (81.6%) were male. The mean in- gested dose of tramadol was 1673.68 ± 608.85 (range: 550- 2750) mg. Aspiration pneumonia was detected in 2 (2.6%) pa- tients, signs of head trauma in 1 (1.3%), altered mental status upon arrival in 31 (32.3%), seizure in 37 (38.5%), and shoul- der dislocation in 25 (32.9%). There was no statistically sig- nificant relationship between tramadol dosage and seizure occurrence (1657.14 ± 654.29 mg in patients who developed seizure and 1683.33 ± 587.66 mg in those who did not, p= 0.858). Out of 76 patients, 1 (1.3%) patient died despite resus- citation efforts. This patient had been randomly allocated to the control group. The intervention and control groups were This open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0). Downloaded from: http://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/aaem 3 Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine. 2022; 10(1): e26 Table 1: Comparison of baseline and post-intervention electrocardiogram (ECG) findings between case (3% hypertonic saline) and control (placebo) groups ECG findings Case (n=40) Control (n=36) P-value Baseline RBBB 3 (7.5) 6 (16.7) 0.217 Wide QRS 5 (12.5) 6 (16.7) 0.606 Long QTc 13 (32.5) 13 (36.1) 1.00 Tall R wave 14 (35.0) 14 (38.9) 1.00 Axis deviation 17 (42.5) 16 (44.4) 0.864 Post-intervention RBBB 1 (2.5) 3 (8.3) 0.255 Wide QRS 0 (0) 6 (16.7) 0.007 Long QTc 4 (10.0) 11 (30.6) 0.025 Tall R wave 9 (22.5) 10 (27.8) 0.596 Axis deviation 11 (27.5) 9 (25.0) 0.805 Data are presented as number (%).; RBBB: right bundle branch block. Figure 1: Flow diagram of patient allocation. ECG: electrocardiogram. similar regarding the mean age (24.53 ± 4.03 vs. 25.28 ± 4.58, respectively; p = 0.449), male/female ratio (33/7 vs. 29/7; re- spectively; p = 0.827), and ingested tramadol dose (1548.75 ± 635.43 vs. 1812.50 ± 553.86; respectively; p = 0.059). 3.2. ECG features Table 1 summarizes abnormal ECG findings upon arrival and after intervention in both study groups. The two groups had similar frequency of RBBB (p = 0.217), long QTc (p = 1.00), This open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0). Downloaded from: http://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/aaem A. Omraninava et al. 4 Tall R wave (p = 1.00), wide QRS (p = 606), and axis deviation (p = 0.864) in baseline ECG, while the frequency of wide QRS interval (p = 0.007) and long QTc (p = 0.025) was significantly lower in patients who received 3% hypertonic saline in the second ECG (table 1). The number needed to treat and the absolute risk reduction of 3% hypertonic saline in the treat- ment of wide QRS were 1 (95% CI: 1.00 – 1.00) and 100%, re- spectively. In the treatment of long QTc, these measures were 1.9 (95%CI: 1.2 – 4.5) and 53.85% (95%CI: 22.00 – 85.69), re- spectively. 4. Discussion Based on the results of this clinical trial, 3% hypertonic saline administration in addition to the routine standard of care in patients with tramadol poisoning can ameliorate potentially life-threatening ECG changes, including QRS prolongation and QTc lengthening. Routine standard of care itself can- not result in statistically significant changes in the aforemen- tioned parameters. It is noteworthy that after receiving hy- pertonic saline, the absolute risk reduction for QRS prolon- gation and QTc interval was 100% and 53.85%, respectively. This gap between the absolute risk reduction for QRS and QT interval, in part, is due to the fact that tramadol-induced car- diotoxicity is a combination of Na+ and K+ channels block- ade. The QRS duration stands for the ventricular depolarization time and QTc interval mainly represents ventricular repo- larization. However, given that QT interval comprises QRS complex, ST segment, and T wave, a widened QRS duration can give rise to QT prolongation without inducing any repo- larization delay (11). An acquired prolonged QTc interval, which mostly occurs owing to the inhibition of the inward potassium rectifier (IKr) channels, is associated with a high risk of developing life-threatening arrhythmias, such as tor- sades de points (TdP)(12). Currently, magnesium sulfate is used for treating and preventing the recurrence of TdP. On the other hand, a widened QRS duration due to inhibition of Na+ channels, can also increase the possibility of develop- ing ventricular arrhythmia (10, 13). Although the pros and cons of hypertonic saline administration in the setting of tra- madol poisoning have not already been explored, its amelio- rative role has been proven to be equal or superior to sodium bicarbonate in animals with TCA toxicity, which also leads to Na+ channel blockade (14, 15). Moreover, in our study, the administration of hypertonic saline did not contribute to any significant adverse effect. At present, the Drug Enforcement Administration has placed tramadol into Schedule IV of controlled substances, implying that it contains a low risk for dependence and abuse. How- ever, opioid poisoning and abuse are not thin on the ground, particularly when it comes to the Middle East (16, 17). Pub- lished studies have demonstrated conflicting results regard- ing dose-dependency of seizure in patients with tramadol poisoning. A recent meta-analysis, in which 51 studies were included, has found that among patients presenting with tra- madol overdose, not taking tramadol abusers into account, the drug dose was not significantly different among patients with or without seizure development (pooled Standardized Mean Difference: 0.27, CI 95%:0.15 to 0.7) (18). These find- ings were consistent with the current study results, which in- cluded patients with tramadol overdose. In harmony with our results, in a prospective study conducted on 1402 pa- tients with tramadol poisoning, the most frequent abnormal ECG findings were sinus tachycardia (33%), QRS right axis deviation (24.2%), QRS widening (6.5%), long QTc interval (18.4%), and RBBB (5.2%) (19). Nonetheless, the management of cardiotoxicity induced by tramadol is complex, given the involvement of both Na+ and K+ channels. Furthermore, there is no consensus regard- ing the best approach to manage this condition. Our study shows that hypertonic saline infusion is an effective thera- peutic strategy to mitigate tramadol-mediated ECG abnor- malities. Lastly, our study had several limitations. It was carried out in a single center setting and included a limited number of patients. Further multicenter studies are neces- sary to prove the generalizability of these findings. 5. Conclusion Given that hypertonic saline infusion can significantly ame- liorate tramadol-mediated ECG changes, including QRS pro- longation and QT lengthening, it can be regarded as a poten- tial therapeutic strategy to prevent the development of ven- tricular arrhythmias caused by tramadol toxicity. 6. Declarations 6.1. Acknowledgments None. 6.2. Authors’ contributions All the authors meet the standard authorship criteria based on the recommendations of international committee of med- ical journal editors. 6.3. Funding None. 6.4. Conflict of interest None. This open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0). Downloaded from: http://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/aaem 5 Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine. 2022; 10(1): e26 References 1. Bakr MH, Radwan E, Shaltout AS, Farrag AA, Mahmoud AR, Abd-Elhamid TH, et al. Chronic exposure to tramadol induces cardiac inflammation and endothelial dysfunc- tion in mice. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):18772. 2. Grond S, Sablotzki A. Clinical pharmacology of tramadol. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2004;43(13):879-923. 3. Beakley BD, Kaye AM, Kaye AD. Tramadol, Pharmacol- ogy, Side Effects, and Serotonin Syndrome: A Review. Pain Physician. 2015;18(4):395-400. 4. Hafezi Moghadam P, Zarei N, Farsi D, Abbasi S, Mofidi M, Rezai M, et al. Electrocardiographic changes in patients with tramadol-induced idiosyncratic seizures. Turk J Emerg Med. 2016;16(4):151-4. 5. Mert T, Gunes Y, Guven M, Gunay I, Gocmen C. Differ- ential Effects of Lidocaine and Tramadol on Modified Nerve Impulse by 4-Aminopyridine in Rats. Pharmacol- ogy. 2003;69(2):68-73. 6. Emamhadi M, Sanaei-Zadeh H, Nikniya M, Zamani N, Dart RC. Electrocardiographic manifestations of tra- madol toxicity with special reference to their ability for prediction of seizures. Am J Emerg Med. 2012;30(8):1481- 5. 7. Nakhaee S, Hoyte C, Dart RC, Askari M, Lamarine RJ, Mehrpour O. A review on tramadol toxicity: mechanism of action, clinical presentation, and treatment. Forensic Toxicol. 2021;39(2):293-310. 8. Eken C. Hypertonic saline: an alternative therapy in TCA overdoses failed to respond sodium bicarbonate. Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2008;46(5):488. 9. Niemann JT, Bessen HA, Rothstein RJ, Laks MM. Elec- trocardiographic criteria for tricyclic antidepressant car- diotoxicity. Am J Cardiol. 1986;57(13):1154-9. 10. Delk C, Holstege CP, Brady WJ. Electrocardiographic ab- normalities associated with poisoning. Am J Emerg Med. 2007;25(6):672-87. 11. Shahsavarinia K, Ghojazadeh M, Ghabousian A, Hatefnia F, Soleimanpour M, Soleimanpour H. An Umbrella Re- view of Clinical Efficacy and Adverse Cardiac Events As- sociated with Hydroxychloroquine or Chloroquine with or Without Azithromycin in Patients with COVID-19. Anesth Pain Med. 2021;11(4):e115827. 12. Ghabousian A, Alizadehasl A, Ansari N, Haghazali M. The Potential Ameliorating Role of Spironolactone in Trastuzumab Mediated Cardiotoxicity: A Narrative Re- view. Int J Med Toxicol Forensic Med. 2021:36127. 13. Wellens HJJ. Ventricular tachycardia: diagnosis of broad QRS complex tachycardia. Heart. 2001;86(5):579. 14. Paksu MS, Zengin H, Ilkaya F, Paksu S, Guzel H, Ucar D, et al. Can empirical hypertonic saline or sodium bicar- bonate treatment prevent the development of cardiotox- icity during serious amitriptyline poisoning? Experimen- tal research. Cardiovasc J Afr. 2015;26(3):134-9. 15. McCabe JL, Cobaugh DJ, Menegazzi JJ, Fata J. Experi- mental tricyclic antidepressant toxicity: a randomized, controlled comparison of hypertonic saline solution, sodium bicarbonate, and hyperventilation. Ann Emerg Med. 1998;32(3 Pt 1):329-33. 16. Alavi-Moghaddam M, Parsa-Mahjoub M, Ghodssi- ghassemabadi R, Bitazar B. Association of Admission Blood Glucose Level with Major Adverse Cardiac Events in Acute Coronary Syndrome; a Cohort Study. Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2019;7(1):e26. 17. Dehghani K, Shojaie M, Pourdavood AH, Khajouei M. Stress Cardiomyopathy (Takotsubo syndrome) Following Accidental Methadone Poisoning; Report of Two Pedi- atric Cases. Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2019;7(1):e22. 18. Nakhaee S, Amirabadizadeh A, Brent J, Miri-Moghaddam E, Foadoddini M, Farrokhfall K, et al. Tramadol and the occurrence of seizures: a systematic review and meta- analysis. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2019;49(8):710-23. 19. Alizadeh Ghamsari A, Dadpour B, Najari F. Frequency of Electrocardiographic Abnormalities in Tramadol Poisoned Patients; a Brief Report. Emerg (Tehran). 2016;4(3):151-4. This open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0). Downloaded from: http://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/aaem Introduction Methods Results Discussion Conclusion Declarations References