Emergency. 2017; 5 (1): e40 BR I E F RE P O RT Protocol Adherence in Prehospital Medical Care Provided for Patients with Chest Pain and Loss of Consciousness; a Brief Report Mostafa Mehrara1, Nader Tavakoli1, Marzieh Fathi1∗, Babak Mahshidfar1, Mohammad Amin Zare1, Azita Asadi1, Saeedeh Hosseinzadeh1, Mehdi Safdarian1 1. Department of Emergency Medicine, Hazrat-e-Rasoul Akram Medical Centre, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Received: May 2016; Accepted: August 2016; Published online: 11 January 2017 Abstract: Introduction: Although many protocols are available in the field of the prehospital medical care (PMC), there is still a notable gap between protocol based directions and applied clinical practice. This study measures the rate of protocol adherence in PMC provided for patients with chest pain and loss of consciousness (LOC). Meth- ods: In this cross-sectional study, 10 educated research assistants audited the situation of provided PMC for non-traumatic chest pain and LOC patients, presenting to the emergency department of a tertiary level teach- ing hospital, compare to national recommendations in these regards. Results: 101 cases with the mean age of 56.7 ± 12.3 years (30-78) were audited (55.4% male). 61 (60.3%) patients had chest pain and 40 (39.7%) cases had LOC. Protocol adherence rates for cardiac monitoring (62.3%), O2 therapy (32.8%), nitroglycerin administration (60.7%), and aspirin administration (52.5%) in prehospital care of patients with chest pain were fair to poor. Pro- tocol adherence rates for correct patient positioning (25%), O2 therapy (75%), cardiac monitoring (25%), pupils examination (25%), bedside glucometery (50%), and assessing for naloxone administration (55%) in prehospital care of patients with LOC were fair to poor. Conclusion: There were more than 20% protocol violation regarding prehospital care of chest pain patients regarding cardiac monitoring, O2 therapy, and nitroglycerin and aspirin administration. There were same situation regarding O2 therapy, positioning, cardiac monitoring, pupils exam- ination, bedside glucometery, and assessing for naloxone administration of LOC patients in prehospital setting. Keywords: Emergency medical services; protocol adherence; chest pain; unconsciousness; medical audit © Copyright (2017) Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences Cite this article as: Mehrara M, Tavakoli N, Fathi M, Mahshidfar B, Zare M, Asadi A, Hosseinzadeh S, Safdarian M. Protocol Adherence in Prehospital Medical Care Provided for Patients with Chest Pain and Loss of Consciousness; a Brief Report. Emergency. 2017; 5 (1): e40. 1. Introduction Prehospital medical care (PMC) is a vital component of med- ical care system which affects the outcome of whole health system by saving the patient’s golden time-to-treatment and changing his prognosis especially in patients with po- tentially life-threatening complaints like chest pain (1-3). Because of the importance of providing on-time high-quality PMC, several national and international evidence-based guidelines are prepared for emergency medical services (EMS) staff which advocate a particular course of action in clinical care and help to choose and perform the most ∗Corresponding Author: Marzieh Fathi; Emergency Department, Hazrat- e-Rasoul Akram Hospital, Satarkhan St, Niyayesh St, Tehran, Iran. Email: marziehfathi@yahoo.com effective interventions as prompt as possible (4). While pre-determined consensus instructions are available widely, there is still a notable gap between protocol based directions and applied clinical practice of EMS staff (5-7). This gap may result in incomplete or inappropriate care providing and increased morbidity and mortality. Thus measuring the rate of protocol adherence is a useful tool for evaluating the quality and comprehensiveness of medical care delivered in prehospital settings and probing the protocols to find the potential defects and insufficiencies which may lead to pro- tocol violation by care providers. There are different studies evaluating the rate of protocol adherence in prehospital and hospital environments and patients with different clinical situations (like cardiac arrest, traumatic brain injury, sepsis, myocardial infarction, seizure, asthma and etc.) (7-12). In our knowledge this is the first study in our country which This open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0). Downloaded from: www.jemerg.com M. Mehrara et al. 2 measures the rate of protocol adherence in prehospital care provided for patients with chief complaints of chest pain and loss of consciousness in an urban public referral system. 2. Methods 2.1. Study design and setting This cross-sectional single-center study was conducted in a tertiary level teaching hospital with total annual census of 40,000 adult patients in May-June 2013. Study was approved by the institutional ethics committee (faculty of medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences) and carried out in accor- dance with Declaration of Helsinki (1989). Informed written consent was obtained from patients or their legal guardians to use their data. 2.2. Participants We enrolled conveniently the ≥18 year old patients with chief complaints of non-traumatic chest pain and loss of con- sciousness who was transferred to hospital by public EMS and admitted in our emergency department. Patients who had taken any medical care in other facilities before trans- ferring to our hospital and patients who had used any med- ications before the arrival of EMS were excluded from study. Patients who had experienced cardiac arrest and needed the use of prehospital cardiac arrest protocol and patients with specific known or highly probable causes of loss of con- sciousness (like head trauma and intoxications) were ex- cluded from study. 2.3. Procedure For evaluating the protocol adherence 10 research assistants who were medical students were educated and informed about the national protocols for essential medical care which should be delivered to patients in prehospital setting in a 4-hour didactic course. In this course they became famil- iar with a checklist consisted of questions about the basic elements of protocol(s) which should be used by EMS care providers in approaching the patients with chest pain and loss of consciousness. Then they completed the checklist for 15 EMS transported patients under supervision of an emer- gency physician. These 15 patients were not included in study. After completing the preliminary checklists, these re- search assistants attended in different clinical day and night shifts in emergency department and evaluated the protocol adherence in provided prehospital care by checking the items considered in checklists. In challenging cases or items, they consulted with on-duty emergency physician. In patients with chief complaint of non-traumatic chest pain the most important items of our national protocol which should be evaluated were: measuring and documenting the blood pres- sure, beginning the cardiac monitoring and oxygen-therapy, maintaining a peripheral intra-venous line, administrating nitroglycerine and aspirin in cases suspicious to acute coro- nary syndrome, assessing the probability of pneumothorax (by auscultation the lung sounds) (14). In patients with chief complaint of loss of consciousness the most important items of our national protocol which should be evaluated were: as- sessing the airway and the patient’s need to airway manage- ment and performed interventions in this domain including the use of manual maneuvers to orotracheal intubation, be- ginning the cardiac monitoring and supplemental oxygen, putting the patient in anti-aspiration position, performing bedside glucometery, examining the pupil size, administrat- ing the naloxone and 50% dextrose (if indicated) (14). 3. Results: PMC of 137 patients were studied (80 patients with non- traumatic chest pain and 57 patients with loss of conscious- ness). 36 cases were exclude because of following criteria: 2 patients had experienced prehospital arrest and resuscitated by EMS staff, 16 patients had received medical care in an- other facility before calling EMS, 11 patients had used sub- lingual nitroglycerine before calling EMS, 3 cases with loss of consciousness were very suspicious to opium overdose, 1 case was suspicious to have tri-cyclic antidepressant over- dose (depending on their history), and 3 cases had suspicious history of head trauma. Finally 101 cases were enrolled for analysis. 3.1. Baseline characteristics PMC of 101 cases with the mean age of 56.7 ± 12.3 years (30- 78) were audited (55.4% male). 61 (60.3%) patients had chest pain and 40 (39.7%) cases had LOC. 35 (34.6%) of patients had previous history of ischemic heart disease, 27 (26.7%) di- abetes mellitus, 30 (29.7%) hypertension, 12 (11.8%) hyper- lipidemia, 6 (5.9%) drug/substance abuse. 3.2. Data Analysis Minimum needed sample size was calculated as 101 patients according to “n=t2pq / (p*δ)2” formula. All data analyses were performed with SPSS version 18 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Continuous numerical data were reported as mean ± standard deviation and categorical variables were presented with frequency and percentage. The adherence rates were categorized into five groups based on Likert scale: ≥ 90% as excellent, 80-90% good, 70-80% fair, 60-70% weak and < 60% poor. 3.3. Protocol adherence Table 1 and 2 summarize the results of analysis regarding the protocol adherence rates of provided PMC for patients This open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0). Downloaded from: www.jemerg.com 3 Emergency. 2017; 5 (1): e40 Table 1: Protocol adherence rate of provided prehospital medical care for patients with chest pain (n=61) Protocol based instruction Adherence rate Assessing the probability of pneumothorax 61 (100.0) Beginning the cardiac monitoring 38 (62.3) Measurement of vital signs 58 (95.1) Beginning the oxygen therapy 20 (32.8) Peripheral intravenous line 59 (96.7) Line is open and working 54 (91.5) Line does not work 5 (8.4) Administration of nitroglycerine 37 (60.7) Administration of aspirin 32 (52.5) Data were presented as frequency and percentage. Table 2: Protocol adherence rate of provided prehospital medical care for patients with loss of consciousness (n=40) Protocol based instruction Adherence rate Airway management 36 (90.0) Correct patient positioning 10 (25.0) Beginning the oxygen therapy 30 (75.0) Beginning the cardiac monitoring 10 (25.0) Measurement of vital signs 40 (100.0) Examining the pupils 10 (25.0) Peripheral intravenous line 40 (100.0) Line is open and working 38 (95.0) Line does not work 2 (5.0) Bedside glucometery 20 (50.0) Assessing the indication of naloxone 22 (55.0) Data were presented as frequency and percentage. with chest pain and LOC. Protocol adherence rates for car- diac monitoring (62.3%), O2 therapy (32.8%), nitroglycerin administration (60.7%), and aspirin administration (52.5%) in prehospital care of patients with chest pain were fair to poor. Protocol adherence rates for correct patient posi- tioning (25%), O2 therapy (75%), cardiac monitoring (25%), pupils examination (25%), bedside glucometery (50%), and assessing for naloxone administration (55%) in prehospital care of patients with LOC were fair to poor. 4. Discussion: Based on the results of present study, protocol adherence regarding cardiac monitoring, O2 therapy, and nitroglycerin and aspirin administration in prehospital care of chest pain patients were fair to poor. Regarding pre hospital care of LOC patients, there were fair to poor protocol adherence for patient positioning, O2 therapy, cardiac monitoring, pupils examination, bedside glucometery, and assessing for nalox- one administration. Except some limited items like assess- ing the probability of pneumothorax and airway manage- ment, other protocol based instructions are not followed by EMS staff. Even vital signs measurements are not done com- pletely and available simply-provided cares like oxygen ther- apy are not provided satisfactorily. Our study showed also that the interventions both in monitoring and treatment sec- tors are under-mentioned by EMS staff and beginning car- diac monitoring is as neglected as administration of nitro- glycerine and aspirin in patients with chest pain. Accord- ing to our results, patients in loss of consciousness group re- ceived less medical care in prehospital setting than patients with chest pain. This is while the approach to patients with both complaints are illustrated in available step-by-step well established protocols which are taught tremendously in al- most all clinical courses implemented for EMS staffs. Our findings about oxygen therapy is compatible with the find- ings of Hale et al who showed in their study that although oxygen use in ambulances is a very common daily proce- dure, protocol adherence in its use in suboptimal especially in some patients like patients with chronic obstructive pul- monary diseases (13). The protocol violation has been is- sued in other studies too. For example a retrospective study on paramedic compliance with advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) epinephrine guidelines in 75 out-of-hospital cardiac arrest showed that only 14% of patients received epinephrine in accordance with current ACLS guidelines (13). Another study by Johansson et al showed that in the majority of out- of-hospital cardiac arrest cases epinephrine is not adminis- This open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0). Downloaded from: www.jemerg.com M. Mehrara et al. 4 tered according to current ACLS guidelines and the adher- ence to guidelines is lower in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest than in in-hospital ones (13). Similar studies on quality of out-of-hospital resuscitation showed similar results. As the Wik et al showed in their study on out-of-hospital resuscita- tion that chest compressions were not delivered half of the time, most of delivered compressions were too shallow and patients’ golden time was wasted without trying to do the chest compressions, electrocardiographic analysis, defibril- lation or any other interventions (6). This is while most stud- ies on this era have shown that protocol adherence can im- prove the management and clinical outcomes of patients (14- 16). Protocol violation is not a problem only in prehospi- tal setting and it is also seen in emergency department and other inpatients settings (17). Some efforts (like presence of a pharmacist on the resuscitation team, simplification of pro- tocols, changing the protocols, etc.) have been done to im- prove the compliance with guidelines but none of them are approved in this era (18). For better conclusion in this re- gard performing a complete KAP (knowledge, attitude, prac- tice) study with larger sample size could be helpful. There- fore, more attention in this field and theoretical and practical training courses in this field seems to be helpful. 5. Conclusion There were more than 20% protocol violation regarding pre- hospital care of chest pain patients regarding cardiac moni- toring, O2 therapy, and nitroglycerin and aspirin administra- tion. There were same situation regarding O2 therapy, po- sitioning, cardiac monitoring, pupils examination, bedside glucometery, and assessing for naloxone administration of LOC patients in prehospital setting. 6. Appendix 6.1. Acknowledgements Authors would like to thank all the staff of Emergency Depart- ment of Shohaday-e 7 Tir Hospital, Tehran, Iran. 6.2. Authors contribution Mostafa Mehrara, Nader tavakoli, Babak Mahshidfar: study design. Azita Asadi, Saeedeh Hoseinzade, Mahdi Safdarian: case enrollment. Marzieh Fathi, Mohammad Amin Zare: data analysis and preparing the manuscript for publication. All authors declare that they had been read the final draft and their responsibility for all part of study. 6.3. Conflict of interest There is no conflict of interest between authors. 6.4. Funding This study has not been funded any institution. References 1. Mathew T, Menown I, McCarty D, Gracey H, Hill L, Adgey A. Impact of pre-hospital care in patients with acute my- ocardial infarction compared with those first managed in-hospital. European heart journal. 2003;24(2):161-71. 2. Cantor WJ, Hoogeveen P, Robert A, Elliott K, Goldman LE, Sanderson E, et al. Prehospital diagnosis and triage of ST-elevation myocardial infarction by paramedics with- out advanced care training. American heart journal. 2012;164(2):201-6. 3. Quinn T, Johnsen S, Gale CP, Snooks H, McLean S, Wool- lard M, et al. Effects of prehospital 12-lead ECG on pro- cesses of care and mortality in acute coronary syndrome: a linked cohort study from the Myocardial Ischaemia Na- tional Audit Project. Heart. 2014:heartjnl-2013-304599. 4. Lugtenberg M, Burgers J, Westert G. Effects of evidence- based clinical practice guidelines on quality of care: a systematic review. Quality and Safety in Health Care. 2009;18(5):385-92. 5. Kirves H, Skrifvars MB, Vahakuopus M, Ekstrom K, Mar- tikainen M, Castren M. Adherence to resuscitation guide- lines during prehospital care of cardiac arrest patients. European Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2007;14(2):75- 81. 6. Wik L, Kramer-Johansen J, Myklebust H, Sorebo H, Svensson L, Fellows B, et al. Quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Jama. 2005;293(3):299-304. 7. Scliopou J, Mader TJ, Durkin L, Stevens M. Paramedic compliance with ACLS epinephrine guidelines in out- of-hospital cardiac arrest. Prehospital Emergency Care. 2006;10(3):394-6. 8. Francke AL, Smit MC, de Veer AJ, Mistiaen P. Fac- tors influencing the implementation of clinical guide- lines for health care professionals: a systematic meta- review. BMC medical informatics and decision making. 2008;8(1):1. 9. Muayqil T, Rowe BH, Ahmed SN. Treatment adherence and outcomes in the management of convulsive status epilepticus in the emergency room. Epileptic disorders. 2007;9(1):43-50. 10. Hale K, Gavin C, O’Driscoll B. Audit of oxygen use in emergency ambulances and in a hospital emer- gency department. Emergency Medicine Journal. 2008;25(11):773-6. 11. Franschman G, Peerdeman S, Greuters S, Vieveen J, Brinkman A, Christiaans H, et al. Prehospital endo- This open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0). Downloaded from: www.jemerg.com 5 Emergency. 2017; 5 (1): e40 tracheal intubation in patients with severe traumatic brain injury: guidelines versus reality. Resuscitation. 2009;80(10):1147-51. 12. Lee P, Luo J, Shieh W, Nien C, Yang P, Kuo S-H, et al. Hospital-based management of acute asthmatic exacer- bation: an assessment of physicians’ behavior in Taiwan. Journal of Asthma. 2001;38(7):575-83. 13. Johansson J, Hammerby R, Oldgren J, Rubertsson S, Gedeborg R. Adrenaline administration during car- diopulmonary resuscitation: poor adherence to clin- ical guidelines. Acta anaesthesiologica scandinavica. 2004;48(7):909-13. 14. Charpentier S, Sagnes-Raffy C, Cournot M, Cambou J-P, Ducasse J-L, Lauque D, et al. Determinants and prognos- tic impact of compliance with guidelines in reperfusion therapy for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: results from the ESTIM Midi-Pyrenees Area. Archives of cardiovascular diseases. 2009;102(5):387-96. 15. Sandouk A, Ducasse J-L, Grolleau S, Azema O, Elbaz M, Farah B, et al. Compliance with guidelines in pa- tients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction after implementation of specific guidelines for emer- gency care: Results of RESCA+ 31 registry. Archives of car- diovascular diseases. 2012;105(5):262-70. 16. Goldstein P, Wiel E. Management of prehospital throm- bolytic therapy in ST-segment elevation acute coro- nary syndrome (< 12 hours). Minerva anestesiologica. 2005;71(6):297-302. 17. Pham JC, Kelen GD, Pronovost PJ. National study on the quality of emergency department care in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction and pneumonia. Academic Emergency Medicine. 2007;14(10):856-63. 18. Draper HM, Eppert JA. Association of pharmacist pres- ence on compliance with advanced cardiac life support guidelines during in-hospital cardiac arrest. Annals of Pharmacotherapy. 2008;42(4):469-74. This open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0). Downloaded from: www.jemerg.com Introduction Methods Results: Discussion: Conclusion Appendix References