Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine. 2022; 10(1): e73 OR I G I N A L RE S E A RC H Attitudes of Emergency Nurses and Patients’ Family Mem- bers Towards the Presence of Family Members During Car- diopulmonary Resuscitation; a Cross-sectional Study Zohreh Hosseini Marznaki1, Samad Karkhah2∗ Mehdi Mohammadian Amiri3, Håkan Källmen4, Azadeh Moradi5, Maede Najjarboura6 1. Department of Nursing, Amol Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery Sciences, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran. 2. Department of Medical-Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran. 3. Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran. 4. Centre for psychiatry research Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. 5. Emam Reza Hospital, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran. 6. Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran. Received: June 2022; Accepted: July 2022; Published online: 6 September 2022 Abstract: Introduction: Family presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is one of the elements where family-centered care is practiced. This study aimed to investigate the attitudes of Iranian emergency nurses and patients’ family members regarding the presence of family during CPR. Methods: In a cross-sectional study, 350 emergency nurses and 254 family members of patients admitted to the emergency department of an ed- ucational hospital in Iran were enrolled. Data were collected from May to November 2020 using convenience sampling and using a 27-item questionnaire of participants’ attitudes towards family presence during CPR. Results: The mean attitude scores of nurses and family members of patients regarding family presence during CPR were 86.79 ± 7.50 and 92.48 ± 6.77, respectively (p < 0.001). The highest and lowest mean scores of nurses’ attitude towards family presence during CPR were related to "CPR performance will be negatively influenced" and "Family members have the right to be present during CPR of their relatives/ Allows relatives to stay with the patient until the end/ Makes the patient less worried ", respectively. The highest and lowest mean scores of fam- ily members’ attitude towards family presence during CPR were related to "Family members may interfere with CPR" and " May be beneficial to the relatives’ grieving process ", respectively. Conclusion: Overall, the results of this study showed that the attitude of emergency nurses and patients’ family members towards family presence during CPR was positive. Of course, the mean attitude score of nurses in this regard was significantly lower. Keywords: Family; Resuscitation; Cardiopulmonary resuscitation; Nurses; Attitude; Emergency Service, Hospital Cite this article as: Hosseini MZ, Karkhah S, Mohammadian AM, Källmen H, Moradi A, Najjarboura M. Attitudes of Emergency Nurses and Patients’ Family Members Towards the Presence of Family Members During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation; a Cross-sectional Study . Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2022; 10(1): e73. https://doi.org/10.22037/aaem.v10i1.1679. 1. Introduction Cardiac arrest occurs when a person’s heartbeat stops (1). Ac- cording to the American Heart Association, 475,000 people in the United States experienced cardiac arrest in 2018 (2). Car- ∗Corresponding Author: Samad Karkhah; Department of Medical-Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Guilan University of Medical Sci- ences, Rasht, Iran. Email: sami.karkhah@yahoo.com, Tel: +989032598167, OR- CID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9193-9176. diopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is an emergency lifesaving procedure that can reverse cardiac arrest (3). When cardiac arrest occurs for patients, their family members in the wait- ing room are informed of the patient’s condition by an emer- gency nurse (4, 5). Patient and family-centered care have substantial benefits for the family, patients, and health care providers. Family presence during CPR is one of the elements where family- centered care is practiced. Family presence during CPR ben- efits the family and patients, and indeed healthcare profes- This open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0). Downloaded from: http://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/aaem HM. Hosseini et al. 2 sional guidelines exist on the implementation of CPR during family presence (6). An integrative review showed that family members would like to be present during CPR. However, the practice is rarely implemented by healthcare professionals (7). Qualitative research in Brazil found that the perspectives differ across family members, patients, and healthcare pro- fessionals about family presence during CPR. However, en- vironmental, sociocultural, and care-related factors predict perspectives towards family presence during CPR (4, 8-10). In Iran, the family is very valuable in culture and religion, and the presence of family members in the final moments of life is important (11). On the other hand, family pres- ence during CPR is a challenging issue in Iran (9). How- ever, previous evidence in Iran has shown that emergency nurses are not prepared for the presence of family members during CPR (4, 9, 12). For example, a study in Iran showed that the attitudes of most emergency nurses and most pa- tients’ family members towards family presence during CPR were negative (12). However, there is limited information on the attitudes of emergency nurses and patients’ family mem- bers towards family presence during CPR (13). Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the attitudes of Iranian emergency nurses and patients’ family members regarding the family presence during CPR. 2. Methods 2.1. Study design and setting In a cross-sectional study, 350 emergency nurses and 254 family members of patients admitted to the emergency de- partment of an educational Hospital in Amol, affiliated to Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Mazandaran were studied regarding their attitude towards the presences of patients’ family during CPR. Data were collected from May to November 2020 using convenience sampling. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Mazandaran Uni- versity of Medical Sciences (IR.MAZUMS.REC.1399.7820). The objectives of the study were explained to participants and informed consent was obtained from them. Participants completed the questionnaires in a private room without the presence of a research team. 2.2. Participants Participation in this study was voluntarily. The nurses with the experience of caring for a patient who underwent CPR were included. In addition, family members of patients that underwent CPR, who were over 18 years old were included. Participants who did not consent to participate in the present study were excluded. 2.3. Data gathering Data were collected using a two-part questionnaire includ- ing 1) participants ’demographic characteristics and 2) par- ticipants’ attitudes towards family presence during CPR. De- mographic characteristics of nurses such as age, sex, marital status, level of education, clinical work experience, employ- ment status, shift work, tendency to work in a non-nursing profession, and work in a non-nursing profession were col- lected. Also, baseline characteristics of family members of patients such as sex, marital status, level of education, and family member’s relationship to the patient, as well as the age of the patient who was resuscitated, and survival of the resus- citated relative were collected. The attitude towards family presence during the CPR ques- tionnaire was designed by Leung and Chow (2012) (14). This tool consists of 27 items in four areas, including 1) attitudes towards patient and family member rights for family pres- ence during the CPR (3 items; range of scores: 3 to 15), poten- tial advantages of family presence during the CPR (8 items; range of scores: 8 to 40), potential disadvantages of fam- ily presence during the CPR (12 items; range of scores: 12 to 60), and opinions about supportive requirements for the implementation of family presence during the CPR (4 items; range of scores: 4 to 20). Participants rate the items of this tool on a five-point Likert scale from strongly disagree (score of 1) to strongly agree (score of 5) for the first 23 items and from very unimportant (score of 1) to very important (score of 5) for the last four items. This tool is scored between 27 and 135. In Iran, the reliability of the present question- naire was confirmed by Zali et al., with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.763 (12). The questionnaire was pilot-tested on ran- domly selected nurses (10 in number) and family members (15 in number), and minor modifications were made (to re- solve confusing wording) based on their feedback about the content, sentence structure, and clinical relevance. Reliabil- ity was assessed, resulting in a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.80, indi- cating high internal consistency. Trained nurses contacted the family members of deceased patients by phone six months after the death and interviewed them. An individual interview was requested with the ex- planation of its purpose and an appointment in the hospital was made where appropriate specialists were informed and called for support (12). 2.4. Statistical analysis The sample size of the family members was calculated us- ing the formula of Z 2 1−α/2×δ2 /d 2 with d=10% and 1-α =0.95. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS for Win- dows, version 16.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Descriptive statistics were presented as mean ± standard deviation for continuous variables and frequency with percentage for cat- This open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0). Downloaded from: http://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/aaem 3 Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine. 2022; 10(1): e73 Table 1: Baseline characteristics of nurses and their correlation with the mean attitude score regarding the presences of family during car- diopulmonary resuscitation Variables Nurses (n=350) Attitude score p-value Age (year) 20-25 35 (10.00) 87.65 ±6.30 26-35 227 (64.86) 86.45 ±7.50 0.029 36-45 65 (18.57) 85.82 ± 6.00 46-55 23 (6.57) 87.86 ± 8.48 Gender Male 56 (16.00) 85.19 ± 7.30 0.081 Female 294 (84.00) 87.10 ± 7.50 Marital Status Single 171 (48.86) 86.84 ± 7.33 0.470 Married 179 (51.14) 86.74 ± 7.64 Level of Education in nursing Bachelor of Science 315 (90.00) 87.00 ± 7.66 0.110 Master of Science 35 (10.00) 84.94 ± 5.59 Working experience (year) 7.11 ± 5.09 ≤10 296 (84.57) 86.71 ± 7.40 0.750 >10 54 (15.43) 87.25 ± 8.09 Employment Status Temporary 192 (54.86) 86.65 ± 7.28 0.148 Official 158 (45.14) 86.95 ± 7.45 Work shift Fixed 77 (22.00) 86.62 ± 7.44 0.320 Rotational 273 (78.00) 87.77 ± 8.24 Tendency to work in a non-nursing profession Yes 143 (40.86) 87.07 ± 7.72 0.880 No 207 (59.14) 86.30 ± 7.17 Working in a non-nursing profession Yes 33 (9.43) 86.87 ± 7.60 0.260 No 317 (90.57) 86.09 ± 6.44 Data are presented as frequency (%) and mean ± standard deviation. Attitude score ranges from 27 to135. egorical variables. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to check the normality of data distribution. The association between attitudes of the two study groups was assessed using the Pearson correlation test. Independent t-test and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used to compare groups. Statistical significance was set to p < 0.05. 3. Results 3.1. Participants’ characteristics In the present study, 350 emergency nurses and 254 family members of patients were included. Of the nurses, 64.86% had an age of 26-35 years, 84% were female, 90% had a Bach- elor of Science in Nursing (BSN) degree, and 84.57% had less than ten years of work experience. Of the family members of patients, 59.45% were male, 79.13% were married, 38.19% had a degree less than a high school diploma, and 33.07% were children of patients. The baseline characteristics of par- ticipants are presented in Tables 1 and 2. 3.2. Attitude towards family presence during CPR The mean attitude score of nurses and family members of pa- tients towards family presence during CPR were 86.79 ± 7.50 and 92.48 ± 6.77, respectively (p < 0.001). The highest and lowest mean scores of nurses’ attitude towards family pres- ence during CPR were related to " CPR performance will be negatively influenced " and "Family members have the right to be present during CPR of their relatives/ Allows relatives to stay with the patient until the end/ Makes the patient less worried ", respectively. The highest and lowest mean scores of family members’ attitude towards family presence dur- ing CPR were related to "Family members may interfere with CPR" and " May be beneficial to the relatives’ grieving pro- cess ", respectively (Table 3). 4. Discussion The results of this study showed that the attitude of emer- gency nurses and patients’ family members towards family This open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0). Downloaded from: http://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/aaem HM. Hosseini et al. 4 Table 2: Baseline characteristics of family members and their correlation with the mean attitude score regarding the presences of family during cardiopulmonary resuscitation Variables Family members (n=254) Attitude score P-value Age of patient (year) 10-20 9 (3.54) 97.11 ± 6.77 21-30 38 (14.96) 89.60 ± 6.48 31-50 145 (57.09) 92.73 ± 6.60 0.019 51-70 57 (22.44) 92.92 ± 6.83 71-90 5 (1.97) 93.80 ± 8.13 Gender Male 151 (59.45) 93.00 ± 6.43 0.140 Female 103 (40.55) 91.72 ± 7.21 Marital Status Single 53 (20.87) 91.72 ± 7.07 0.363 Married 201 (79.13) 92.74 ± 6.59 Level of Education < high school diploma 97 (38.19) 92.60 ± 6.90 0.927 High school diploma 93 (36.61) 92.55 ± 6.64 College education or higher 64 (25.20) 92.20 ± 6.88 Relationship to patient Spouse 82 (32.28) 92.67 ± 7.11 Child 84 (33.07) 92.35 ± 6.92 Father 37 (14.57) 91.67 ± 6.64 0.702 Mother 26 (10.24) 92.84 ± 5.48 Sister or brother 25 (9.84) 94.11 ± 6.68 Survival after resuscitation Yes 34 (13.39) 91.73 ± 6.33 0.488 No 220 (86.61) 92.60 ± 6.85 Data are presented as frequency (%) and mean ± standard deviation. Attitude score ranges from 27 to 135. presence during CPR was positive. Of course, the mean atti- tude score of nurses in this regard was significantly lower. This finding was not in line with the results of studies from Brazil, (8) Trinidad and Tobago, (15) and Iran (9). A study in Brazil (8) found that health care providers had a negative attitude towards family presence during CPR. They believed that changes should be made to the hospital infrastructure to accommodate family members and train staff to meet the emotional needs of families during CPR (8). Another study in Trinidad and Tobago found that families experienced psy- chological damage from CPR and that family presence dur- ing CPR prolonged the resuscitation process (15). Also, a study in Iran showed that emergency nurses have a negative attitude towards family presence during CPR, which can be improved through workshops (9). The attitude of nurses to- wards family presence during CPR is more positive in West- ern countries compared to Middle-Eastern countries (16). A study in the USA found that nurses had a more positive atti- tude towards family presence during CPR than other health care workers (17). However, a study in Singapore found that health care workers had a negative attitude towards family presence during CPR (6). This difference may be due to dif- ferences in the culture and religion of nurses (18). There- fore, emergency nurses need to be prepared through work- shops and effective policies in this area. Also, well-designed interventions are essential to improve the attitude of emer- gency nurses towards family presence during CPR. The at- titude of patients’ family members towards family presence during CPR was positive. Consistent with this finding, a study in China (14) found that 80% of patients’ family members had a positive attitude towards family presence during CPR. A study in Iran (12) showed that the presence of family mem- bers during CPR reduces their anxiety. Also, another study in Iran (19) found that family presence during CPR helps those present accept patients’ deaths more easily than their fami- lies. However, there is limited evidence regarding the attitude of family members of patients related to family presence dur- ing CPR, and there is no policy to support it. Therefore, it is recommended that Iranian researchers pay special attention to the attitude of family members of pa- tients related to family presence during CPR in future stud- ies. Also, well-designed interventions to reduce the gap be- tween the attitudes of nurses and family members and devel- oping policies and workshops can help improve the attitude of emergency nurses regarding family presence during CPR. This open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0). Downloaded from: http://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/aaem 5 Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine. 2022; 10(1): e73 Table 3: Comparing the attitudes of nurses and family members regarding family presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) Statement Nurses (n=350) Family (n=254) Family members have the right to be present during CPR 2.02 ± 0.75 3.73 ± 1.05 Permission should be obtained in advance, if possible, from the patient prior to witnessed CPR 2.47 ± 1.01 3.98 ± 0.89 I would be present during CPR of my relative if allowed 2.90 ± 1.24 3.73 ± 1.10 Presence of family members would benefit the patient 2.85 ± 1.36 3.19 ± 1.32 Allows relatives to ensure everything was done 2.18 ± 1.11 3.75 ± 1.11 Allows relatives to stay with the patient until the end 2.02 ± 0.91 3.79 ± 1.09 Makes the patient less worried 2.02 ± 0.91 2.51 ± 1.51 Family members provide support to the patient 2.73 ± 1.21 3.85 ± 1.07 Would benefit the family members 2.36 ± 1.03 3.88 ± 1.03 May be beneficial to the relatives’ grieving process 2.43 ± 1.02 1.87 ± 0.94 Improves relatives’ understanding of CPR 2.86 ± 1.24 3.93 ± 1.00 May impair patient dignity 2.30 ± 0.97 3.79 ± 1.10 Relatives may have a bad last impression of patient 4.18 ± 0.97 3.73 ± 1.16 Process of CPR is too distressing to relatives 3.93 ± 1.24 2.76 ± 1.15 Relatives may have long-term psychological sequel 4.02 ± 1.11 3.78 ± 1.03 Family members may interfere with CPR 4.32 ± 0.89 4.40 ± 0.92 Will prolong the CPR, making the decision to stop more difficult 4.06 ± 1.23 2.54 ± 1.19 Increases the emotional stress of physicians 3.66 ± 1.30 2.05 ± 0.99 Negatively influences the physicians’ performance 3.88 ± 1.20 1.96 ± 0.93 Increases the emotional stress of nurses 3.84 ± 1.21 3.46 ± 1.23 Negatively influences the nurses’ performance 4.38 ± 0.88 3.33 ± 1.20 CPR performance will be negatively influenced 4.44 ± 0.78 3.12 ± 1.19 May increase litigation or complaint 4.18 ± 1.15 4.12 ± 0.87 Should be supported by a member of staff 2.15 ± 0.74 3.82 ± 0.96 Facilities must be available to screen off the area where the CPR takes place to allow privacy 3.57 ± 1.22 3.60 ± 1.08 The physician should speak with or write to the relatives afterwards to discuss the CPR 3.40 ± 1.25 3.58 ± 1.17 If required, the doctor should arrange appropriate referrals for witnessing relatives 3.54 ± 1.05 4.12 ± 0.85 Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. The range of score for each question was 1 to 5. 5. Limitation The present study had several limitations. The main limita- tion of this study was the lack of evaluation of patients’ atti- tudes towards family presence during CPR. The study also as- sessed the attitudes of emergency nurses and patients’ family members using a self-report questionnaire that may lead to a response bias. All responses were from one department at one single hospital, which may have a negative impact on ex- ternal validity. 6. Conclusion The results of this study showed that the attitude of emer- gency nurses and patients’ family members towards family presence during CPR was positive. Of course, the mean atti- tude score of nurses in this regard was significantly lower. 7. Declarations 7.1. Acknowledgments None. 7.2. Authors’ contributions Study concept and design by all authors; Data acquisition by all authors; Data interpretation by all authors; drafting of the manuscript by all authors; Revision of the manuscript by all authors; the final version of the manuscript is approved by all authors. 7.3. Funding and supports None. 7.4. Conflict of interest The authors declare no conflict of interest. 7.5. Availability of data The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reason- able request. References 1. Sawyer KN, Camp-Rogers TR, Kotini-Shah P, Del Rios M, Gossip MR, Moitra VK, et al. Sudden cardiac arrest This open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0). Downloaded from: http://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/aaem HM. Hosseini et al. 6 survivorship: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2020;141(12):e654-e85. 2. Zègre-Hemsey JK, Grewe ME, Johnson AM, Arnold E, Cunningham CJ, Bogle BM, et al. Delivery of automated external defibrillators via Drones in simulated cardiac ar- rest: users’ experiences and the Human-Drone interac- tion. Resuscitation. 2020;157:83-8. 3. Tanaka H, Ong MEH, Siddiqui FJ, Ma MHM, Kaneko H, Lee KW, et al. Modifiable Factors Associated With Sur- vival After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in the Pan- Asian Resuscitation Outcomes Study. Annals of emer- gency medicine. 2018;71(5):608-17.e15. 4. Atabaki P, Mehryar HR, Aghazadeh J, Zeinali M, Hasani L, Nouri GH. Evaluation of attitude of doctors and nurses of emergency department toward presence of patients’ rel- atives during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in selected emergency department centers in Urmia, Iran. J Anal Res Clin Med. 2018;6(3):115-20. 5. Bellali T, Manomenidis G, Platis C, Kourtidou E, Galanis P. Factors Associated With Emergency Department Health Professionals’ Attitudes Toward Family Presence During Adult Resuscitation in 9 Greek Hospitals. Dimensions of critical care nursing : DCCN. 2020;39(5):269-77. 6. Lederman Z, Baird G, Dong C, Leong BS, Pal RY. Attitudes of Singapore Emergency Department staff towards fam- ily presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Clin Ethics. 2017;12(3):124-34. 7. Toronto CE, LaRocco SA. Family perception of and expe- rience with family presence during cardiopulmonary re- suscitation: an integrative review. J Clin Nurs. 2019;28(1- 2):32-46. 8. Barreto MS, Garcia-Vivar C, Mitchell M, Marcon SS. Fam- ily presence during resuscitation in emergency depart- ments: professionals’ attitudes in Brazil. International nursing review. 2018;65(4):567-76. 9. Abdar ME, Rafiei H, Amiri M, Tajadini M, Tavan A, Rayani F, et al. Iranian nurse attitudes towards the pres- ence of family members during CPR. Br J Card Nurs. 2016;11(9):438-43. 10. Hassankhani H, Zamanzadeh V, Rahmani A, Haririan H, Porter JE. Family Presence During Resuscitation: A Double-Edged Sword. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2017;49(2):127- 34. 11. Al-Mutair AS, Plummer V, Copnell B. Family presence during resuscitation: a descriptive study of nurses’ atti- tudes from two Saudi hospitals. Nurs Crit. 2012;17(2):90- 8. 12. Zali M, Hassankhani H, Powers KA, Dadashzadeh A, Rajaei Ghafouri R. Family presence during resuscita- tion: A descriptive study with Iranian nurses and pa- tients’ family members. International emergency nurs- ing. 2017;34:11-6. 13. Hassankhani H, Zamanzadeh V, Rahmani A, Haririan H, Porter JE. Family Presence During Resuscitation: A Double-Edged Sword. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2017;49(2):127- 34. 14. Leung NY, Chow SK. Attitudes of healthcare staff and patients’ family members towards family presence dur- ing resuscitation in adult critical care units. J Clin Nurs. 2012;21(13-14):2083-93. 15. Mahabir D, Sammy I. Attitudes of ED staff to the pres- ence of family during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a Trinidad and Tobago perspective. Emergency medicine journal : EMJ. 2012;29(10):817-20. 16. Sak-Dankosky N, Andruszkiewicz P, Sherwood PR, Kvist T. Integrative review: nurses’ and physicians’ experi- ences and attitudes towards inpatient-witnessed resus- citation of an adult patient. Journal of advanced nursing. 2014;70(5):957-74. 17. Ferrara G, Ramponi D, Cline TW. Evaluation of Physi- cians’ and Nurses’ Knowledge, Attitudes, and Com- pliance With Family Presence During Resuscitation in an Emergency Department Setting After an Educa- tional Intervention. Advanced emergency nursing jour- nal. 2016;38(1):32-42. 18. Dabiriyan A HS, Majd HA, Ezati Z. Attitudes of Physi- cians and Nurses toward family presence during resus- citation in emergency rooms of hospitals affiliated with Tehran, Iran and Shahid Beheshti Universities of Medical Sciences. Adv Nurs Midwifery. 2010;20(69):1-4. 19. Taraghi Z, Ilail E, yaghoobi T, noroozinejad F, Naseri F, Baghernejad SK, et al. A Comparison between Physi- cians, Nurses and the Immediate Families of Patients‘ At- titudes towards Family Members Presence during CPR. Hospital. 2013;12(3):65-74. This open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0). Downloaded from: http://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/aaem Introduction Methods Results Discussion Limitation Conclusion Declarations References