Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine. 2022; 10(1): e85 OR I G I N A L RE S E A RC H Association of Echocardiographic Findings with in- Hospital Mortality of COVID-19 Patients and Their Changes in One-Month Follow-Up; a Cohort Study Seyed Morsal Mosallami Aghili1, Mehran Khoshfetrat1, Ali Asgari2, Reza Arefizadeh1, Aboulfazl Mohsenizadeh1, Seyyed Hossein Mousavi1∗ 1. Department of Cardiology, School of Medicine, AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. 2. Department of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Received: July 2022; Accepted: August 2022; Published online: 24 October 2022 Abstract: Introduction: Evidence showed that cardiac complications may occur in coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) during the acute and post-infection phases. This study aimed to evaluate the association between the echocar- diographic characteristics and in-hospital mortality of COVID-19 patients as well as the changes after one- month follow-up. Methods: All adult (≥18 years old) hospitalized COVID-19 patients in need of echocardiogra- phy based on the guideline of the Iranian Society of Echocardiography for performing various types of echocar- diography during the COVID-19 pandemic were included in this study. An expert cardiologist performed the echocardiography on all patients and also on all available patients one month after discharge. Results: 146 hos- pitalized cases of COVID-19 and 81 cases available for 1-month follow-up echocardiography were studied in this prospective study. Left ventricle wall hypokinesia, aorta valve stenosis, dilated Inferior Vena Cava (IVC), and Pul- monary Artery Systolic Pressure (PASP) of more than 35 were associated with 3.59 (95% CI: 1.19-10.79, p = 0.02), 11 (95% CI: 3.3 – 36.63, p = 0.001), 5.58 (95% CI: 1.04-29.41, p = 0.041), and 2.91 (95% CI: 1.35 – 6.3, p = 0.001) times higher odds of mortality than healthy subjects. In 1-month follow-up of patients, deterioration in LVEF (p = 0.03) was detected in the not-fully vaccinated patients, and a significant decrease in PASP was observed in all cases (p = 0.04); but these changes were not clinically important. Conclusion: Left ventricle wall hypokinesia, aorta valve stenosis, dilated IVC, and PASP ≥ 35 were predictors of in-hospital mortality in our study. There were not any potential clinically significant differences in one-month echocardiographic follow-ups of the studied patients. Keywords: COVID-19; Echocardiography; Prognosis; Mortality; SARS-CoV-2 Cite this article as: Mosallami Aghili SM, Khoshfetrat M, Asgari A, Arefizadeh R, Mohsenizadeh A, Mousavi SH. Association of Echocardio- graphic Findings with in-Hospital Mortality of COVID-19 Patients and Their Changes in One-Month Follow-Up; a Cohort Study. Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2022; 10(1): e85. https://doi.org/10.22037/aaem.v10i1.1787. 1. Introduction Since the start of the coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic in late 2019, to August 5, 2022, the virus has spread to 228 countries and territories and caused 6 million deaths in less than 3 years (1). Iran was one of the first countries to become involved in this pandemic and is one of the top 20 countries with the greatest number of COVID-19 patients ∗Corresponding Author: Seyyed Hossein Mousavi; AJA University of Medi- cal Sciences, Etemadzadeh street, Fatemi-Gharbi Street, Tehran, Iran. Postal Code: 1411718541, E-mail: dr.shmusavi@ajaums.ac.ir, Tel: +9821- 86096350, ORCID: 0000-0002-0026-2989. (2, 3). Although the respiratory system is the main organ in- volved in COVID-19 infection, there is strong evidence that the virus responsible for this disease (SARS-CoV-2) can af- fect various organs, such as the heart, due to its receptor, an- giotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) (4). The cardiac manifestations of COVID-19, as important causes of its morbidity and mortality (5), vary from asymp- tomatic increases in cardiac biomarkers (6). The virus could injure the heart directly, due to myocarditis or infarction, or indirectly, due to shock or pulmonary complications (6). Also, previous studies introduced cardiac complications such as myocardial fibrosis and arrhythmia as sequelae of long- term COVID-19 (7). This open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0). Downloaded from: http://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/aaem SM. Mosallami Aghili et al. 2 Echocardiography is a valuable tool for assessment of the cardiovascular system during COVID-19 infection, because it is generally available, affordable, and can provide useful clin- ical information that could even impact the treatment strate- gies of the patients (8). Most previous echocardiographic studies assessed the cardiac characteristics of infected pa- tients during hospitalization. They demonstrated a range of cardiac complications, including left ventricular (LV ) and right ventricular (RV ) dysfunctions during the acute phase of COVID-19 (6, 8-11). These characteristics have been demon- strated to be potential independent predictors of progno- sis (7, 9). Also, few studies evaluated post-infection car- diac complications and their related changes in echocardio- graphy (12-14). Evidence shows individuals with COVID-19 are more likely to develop cardiovascular diseases of various types after the first 30 days following infection (15). Due to the need to assess baseline echocardiographic characteristics of the patients as a significant factor in prognosis and the lack of follow-up studies in Iran, we conducted this study to eval- uate the association between the echocardiographic charac- teristics and in-hospital mortality of COVID-19 patients as well as the changes after one-month follow-up. 2. Methods 2.1. Study design and setting This prospective cohort study was conducted from January 2022 to July 2022 at Imam Reza Educational Hospital, Tehran, Iran. The data of each COVID-19 patient was checked from hospitalization to discharge or in-hospital mortality. Also, one month after discharge from the hospital, patients were referred to the hospital’s cardiology clinic for follow-up echocardiography. All diagnostic and treatment processes were based on the latest version of the national COVID-19 protocol. Before the start of data gathering, the Ethical Com- mittee of AJA University of Medical Sciences approved the study protocol (IR.AJAUMS.REC.1400.261). The researchers acquired written informed consent and followed the recom- mendations in Helsinki Declaration. 2.2. Study population All adults (≥18 years old) hospitalized due to COVID-19 in the COVID-19 ward or intensive care unit (ICU) were included in this study if they had an indication for echocardiography ac- cording to “the guideline of the Iranian Society of Echocar- diography for performing various types of echocardiography during the COVID-19 pandemic” (16). The indications in- clude being in shock state or presentation of new arryth- mia (except for Premature atrial contraction (PAC) or isolated premature ventricular contraction (PVC)), cardiomegaly in the chest CT-scan, moderate or severe pericardial effusion in the chest computed tomography (CT) scan, rise of car- diac biomarker, new or significant echocardiography (ECG) changes, generalized edema, persistent chest pain or dysp- nea unexplained with pulmonary involvement, and exacer- bation of the previous heart disease. COVID-19 infection was confirmed using reverse transcription–polymerase chain re- action (RT-PCR) in all cases. Pregnancy, out-of-hospital mor- tality, and personal request for withdrawal from the project were the exclusion criteria. After the request of cardiology consultation from the in-charge physician of the ward or ICU, if the inclusion criteria were fulfilled, echocardiography would be performed. The inclusion criteria were checked for all of the patients by an expert cardiologist. Follow-up echocardiography was performed on all of the available pa- tients one month after discharge at the hospital cardiology clinic. 2.3. Outcomes The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Study data was described in two groups of deceased and survived pa- tients based on the in-hospital incidences. Secondary out- come was one-month follow-up changes in the echocardio- graphic findings, considering the vaccination as a moderator factor. 2.4. Data gathering A checklist was developed for the purpose of gathering pa- tients’ data. Demographic characteristics (age and gender), medical history (diabetes mellitus, hypertension, ischemic heart disease, neurological disease, and cancer), and the his- tory of COVID-19 vaccination (0-dose, 1-dose, and 2-dose) and time of vaccination were recorded on the checklist from hospital medical records initially. Patients with a history of no vaccination, 1-dose vaccination, or 2-dose vaccination in less than 2 weeks from the hospital administration against COVID-19 with any of the confirmed vaccines (by the Min- istry of Health of the Islamic Republic of Iran) were consid- ered as the not-fully vaccinated group, and patients with a history of 2-dose vaccination within two weeks or more be- fore the hospital administration were considered the fully vaccinated group. Neither the patients nor the assessor were blinded to vaccination states. All of the echocardiograms were performed by an expert car- diologist with more than 10 years of clinical experience in the intensive care unit (ICU). Follow-up echocardiography was performed by the same expert cardiologist. To reduce the measurement bias, an expert cardiologist who had a fel- lowship in echocardiography designed the study and chose the variables with the lowest dependence on the operator. Echocardiography was performed using the Vivid 3 set device (General Electric Company). All abnormalities discovered during an echocardiogram were evaluated and reported. The American Society of Echocardiography’s guidelines for inter- This open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0). Downloaded from: http://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/aaem 3 Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine. 2022; 10(1): e85 Table 1: Comparing the baseline characteristics of the hospitalized COVID-19 patients between survived and non-survived cases Variable In-hospital mortality P No (n = 98) Yes (n = 48) Age (year) Mean ± SD 60.94 ± 16.68 70.52 ± 14.10 0.002 Gender Male 54 (66.67) 27 (33.33) 0.89 Female 44 (67.69) 21 (32.31) Underlying disease DM 25 (59.52) 17 (40.48) 0.21 HTN 41 (65.08) 22 (34.92) 0.64 IHD 20 (58.82) 14 (41.18) 0.24 ND 6 (46.15) 7 (53.85) 0.09 Cancer 9 (60.00) 6 (40.00) 0.53 Length of hospitalization Mean ± SD 9.98 ±9.07 8.08 ±6.84 0.11 Vaccination No 24 (48.00) 26 (52.00) 1 dose 24 (58.53) 17 (41.46) <0.001 2 doses 50 (90.90) 5 (9.09) Data are presented as mean ± Standard Deviation (SD) or frequency (%). DM: Diabetes Mellitus; HTN: Hypertension; IHD: Ischemic Heart Disease; ND: Neurologic disorders. preting echocardiography were followed (17). All of the cate- gorical echocardiographic variables including cardiac valves (mitral, aortic, tricuspid, pulmonary) abnormalities (steno- sis or regurgitation), high Pulmonary Artery Systolic Pres- sure (PASP) (≥35mmHg), Left Ventricle Hypertrophy (LVH), Inferior Vena Cava (IVC) dilation, left ventricle wall motion (normal, hypokinesia, akinesia), pericardial effusion (nor- mal, mild, moderate, severe), enlargement of ventricles (bi- lateral, right, left, none), Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunc- tion (LVSD), Left Ventricular Diastolic Dysfunction (LVDD), and Right Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction (RVSD), and also quantitative variables including left ventricle ejection frac- tion (%), left ventricular (LV ) end-diastolic diameter (cen- timeter), LV end-systolic diameter (centimeter), and PASP were extracted from the echocardiographic reports. Length of stay (days), in-hospital mortality, and ICU admis- sion were extracted from hospital medical records after dis- charge of the patients. In-hospital mortality, and ICU admis- sion were considered as prognostic factors and the main out- comes in this study. 2.5. Statistical analysis SPSS version 25 was used for all statistical analyses. Based on the findings of Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for normality, none of the variables showed a normal distribution, so we used non-parametric tests for the analysis. Two quantitative groups were compared using Mann-Whitney U test. The as- sociation of two categorical variables was assessed using the chi-square test and, when necessary, the Fisher’s exact test. Logistic regression was performed to calculate Odds ratio (OR) of echocardiographic parameters for in-hospital mor- tality. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare echocardiogram parameters at the baseline and 1-month follow-up. Statistics were considered significant for P-values under 0.05. 3. Results 3.1. Baseline characteristics of patients 146 confirmed cases of COVID-19 with the mean age of 64.09 ± 16.46 (range: 21-92) years were studied (55.5% male). The most frequent underlying diseases were hypertension (43.2%), diabetes mellitus (28.8%), ischemic heart disease (23.3%), cancer (10.3%), and neurological disorders (8.9%). The mean duration of hospitalization was 9.36 ± 8.4 days. 90 (61.6%) cases were admitted to the ICU, and also, 48 (32.9%) cases died during hospitalization. 37.7% of cases were fully vaccinated against COVID-19, 28.1% had received their first dose of vaccine, and 34.2% had not been vaccinated by the time of admission to the hospital. Baseline characteristics of the patients are described in table 1 and compared between survived and non-survived cases. 3.2. Echocardiographic findings and in-hospital mortality The characteristics of the in-hospital echocardiograms of the studied COVID-19 patients are compared between survived and non-survived cases in table 2. There was a significant correlation between aortic valve stenosis/regurgitation (p < 0.001), hypokinesia in the left ventricle wall motion (p = This open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0). Downloaded from: http://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/aaem SM. Mosallami Aghili et al. 4 Table 2: Echocardiographic characteristics of the patients based on their mortality status Variable In-hospital mortality OR (95% CI) P No (n = 98) Yes (n = 48) Left ventricle wall motion Normal 91 (70.54) 38 (29.46) ref - Hypokinesia 6 (40.00) 9 (60.00) 3.59(1.19-10.79) 0.02 Akinesia 0 (0.00) 1 (100.00) NE - Mitral valve Normal 20 (74.07) 7 (25.93) constant 0.43 Mild Regurgitation 71 (66.98) 35 (33.02) 1.05 (0.09-11.82) 0.567 Moderate Regurgitation 4 (44.44) 5 (55.56) 1.48 (0.15-14.74) 0.271 Stenosis 3 (75) 1 (25) 3.75 (0.27-51.37) 0.269 Tricuspid valve Normal 32 (69.57) 14 (30.43) constant 0.08 Mild TR 60 (69.77) 26 (30.23) 0.27 (0.08-0.99) 0.126 Moderate/severe TR 5 (38.46) 8 (61.54) 0.27 (0.08-0.91) 0.475 Aorta valve Normal 88 (77.19) 26 (22.81) ref - Stenosis 4 (23.53) 13 (76.47) 11 (3.3 – 36.63) 0.001 Regurgitation 6 (40) 9 (60) 2.17 (0.47-9.95) 0.32 Pulmonary Artery Systolic Pressure 35 80 (73.39) 29 (26.61) ref - ≥35 18 (48.65) 19 (51.35) 2.91 (1.35-6.3) 0.001 Pericardial effusion No 81 (68.64) 37 (31.36) 1.37 (0.57-3.3) 0.66 Mild 16 (61.54) 10 (38.46) NE - Severe 1 (100) 0 (0) NE - Left Ventricle Hypertrophy No 74 (64.91) 40 (35.09) 0.54 (0.21-1.36) 0.2 Yes 24 (77.42) 7 (22.58) NE - Inferior Vena Cava Normal 96 (69.06) 43 (30.94) ref - Dilated 20 (38.46) 32 (61.54) 5.58 (1.04-29.41) 0.041 Enlargement of ventricles No 90 (66.67) 45 (33.33) constant 0.86 Bilateral 2 (66.67) 1 (33.33) 1 (0.09-11.32) 1 LV 3 (60) 2 (40) 1.33 (0.22-8.27) 0.76 RV 3 (100) 0 (0) NE - Left ventricle Ejection fraction, mean, SD 53.36 ± 5.75 47.28 ± 12.5 - <0.001 End-diastolic diameter, mean, SD 5.11 ± 0.7 5.41 ± 0.75 - 0.02* End-systolic diameter, mean, SD 3.09 ± 0.55 3.74 ± 1.31 - <0.001 Left Ventricular Dysfunction Normal 79 (73.15) 29 (26.85) ref - Mild systolic 3 (75) 1 (25) 0.91 (0.09-9.08) 0.94 Significant systolic 6 (33.33) 12 (66.67) 5.45 (1.87-15.86) 0.75 Mild diastolic 10 (66.67) 5 (33.33) 1.36 (0.43-4.32) 0.6 Moderate diastolic 0 (0) 1 (100) NE - Right Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction Normal 96 (68.57) 44 (31.43) 2.59 (0.06-117.32) 0.07 Mild 0 (0) 2 (100) NE - Moderate 0 (0) 1 (100) NE - Data are presented as mean ± Standard Deviation (SD) or frequency (%). NE: not estimated; ref: Reference; OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval; TR: Tricuspid regurgitation. This open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0). Downloaded from: http://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/aaem 5 Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine. 2022; 10(1): e85 Table 3: Comparing the echocardiographic parameters of COVID-19 patients at the time of admission and 1-month follow-up (F/U) between vaccinated and non-vaccinated cases Variable Total P Full vaccination P Incomplete vaccination P Left ventricle ejection fraction Baseline 53.27 ± 6.08 0.02 54 ± 5.09 0.28 52.56 ± 6.9 0.03 F/U 52.41 ± 5.65 53.50 ± 4.11 51.34 ± 6.71 Left ventricle end-diastolic diameter Baseline 5.14 ± 0.71 0.79 5.17 ± 0.85 0.03 5.11 ± 0.57 0.11 F/U 5.14 ± 0.66 5.12 ± 0.78 5.16 ± 0.53 Left ventricle end-systolic diameter Baseline 3.14 ± 0.53 0.17 3.09 ± 0.50 0.68 3.19 ± 0.55 0.11 F/U 3.16 ± 0.48 3.11 ± 0.44 3.21 ± 0.52 Pulmonary artery systolic pressure Baseline 28.93 ± 7.11 0.04 28.28 ± 5.91 0.23 29.56 ± 8.13 0.93 F/U 27.93 ± 4.11 27.62 ± 4.02 28.22 ± 4.22 Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). 0.017), higher levels of PASP (≥35) (p = 0.008), dilated IVC (p = 0.039), LV ejection fraction (p = 0.00), LV end systolic diam- eter (p = 0.001), LV end-diastolic diameter (p = 0.018), and left ventricular dysfunction (p = 0.007) with in-hospital mortality. Logistic regression analysis showed that participants with hy- pokinesia of the left ventricle wall had 3.59 times (95% CI: 1.19–10.79, p = 0.02) higher odds of mortality than partici- pants with normal left ventricle wall motion. Also, having an aortic valve stenosis was associated with 11 times (95% CI: 3.3–36.63, p = 0.001) higher odds of mortality than sub- jects with a healthy aortic valve. A dilated IVC was associated with 5.58 times (95% CI: 1.04-29.41, p = 0.041) higher odds of mortality than subjects with normal IVC. Subjects with PASP ≥35 had 2.91 times (95% CI: 1.35-6.3, p = 0.001) higher odds of mortality than subjects with PASP<35. Data of Pulmonary valve evaluation was not included in regression due to low incidence of abnormalities (1 deceased patient with stenosis and 3 patients with regurgitation, out of which 2 died). 3.3. Follow-up echocardiography After one month, 81 of the 98 survived cases were available for a follow-up echocardiographic evaluation. We compared some echocardiography parameters in three groups of pa- tients: all cases, fully vaccinated, and not-fully vaccinated (table 3). LVEF decreased significantly after one month in all cases (p = 0.02). This decrease was not significant among pa- tients who had a history of full vaccinations against COVID- 19. Furthermore, we detected a significant decrease in LV end-diastolic diameter in the vaccinated group (p = 0.03) and decrease in PASP in all cases (p = 0.004) after one month. Al- though these changes were statistically significant, none of these differences are clinically important. 4. Discussion Based on the findings of the present study, echocardiography could be considered as a useful tool for detection of high-risk COVID-19 patients. Our analysis showed that left ventricle wall hypokinesia, aorta valve stenosis, dilated IVC, and PASP ≥ 35 were associated with 3.59 (95% CI: 1.19-10.79, p = 0.02), 11 (95% CI: 3.3 – 36.63, p = 0.001), 5.58 times (95% CI: 1.04- 29.41, p = 0.041), and 2.91 (95% CI: 1.35 – 6.3, P=0.001) times higher odds of in-hospital mortality. In this study, we could find abnormalities in LV parameters in patients hospitalized due to COVID-19, which is in line with previous studies (8, 11). Direct injuries such as myocarditis due to binding of SARS-CoV-2 to ACE2 receptors or indirect injury due to shock and systematic involvement could lead to these complications (6, 18-21). Also, we could establish a sig- nificant correlation between these abnormalities and prog- nosis, supporting previous evidence (9, 22). Cardiac parameters also changed in the post-infection pe- riod, especially the decrease of LVEF in patients who were not fully vaccinated. Other follow-up studies reported LV dys- function, similar to our study (12, 14, 23). The underlying mechanisms of the post-acute phase abnormalities are not well understood. However, a long-lasting inflammatory re- sponse brought on by persisting viral reservoirs in the heart after the acute infection (24) or an immunological reaction to cardiac antigens through molecular mimicry (25) are two po- tential mechanisms of delayed injury. PASP was introduced as an independent prognostic factor in the study by Pishgahi et al. (9). In this study, we found that a higher level of PASP (≥35) had a significant association with in-hospital mortality (2.91 times higher odds). In our follow- up, PASP decreased significantly in comparison to the base- line, supporting the findings of previous studies (13, 14). This outcome may be due to the drop in pulmonary artery pres- This open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0). Downloaded from: http://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/aaem SM. Mosallami Aghili et al. 6 sure caused by the end of the acute phase of COVID-19 and its effects on the pulmonary system (23). Researchers are currently working hard to identify COVID-19 prediction parameters that are more reliable (26). Evidence shows that cardiovascular complications are important pre- dictors of mortality in COVID-19 patients (27-29). A study in Iran demonstrated that EF under 30%, RV dysfunction, col- lapse of the IVC, and higher levels of PASP are independent factors of death in patients with COVID-19 (9). We had sim- ilar results in our logistic regression analysis. Left ventricle wall hypokinesia, aortic valve stenosis, dilated IVC, and PASP ≥ 35 were predictors of in-hospital mortality in our study. Our study, in-line with previous studies (10, 22, 30), reported valvular dysfunction, mostly mild regurgitation of mitral and tricuspid valves. Importantly, patients with aortic valve stenosis had 11 times higher odds of mortality than patients with a normal aortic valve. The correlation between these dysfunctions and COVID-19 is still vague, but they are likely related to a previously diagnosed or undiscovered disease or ventricular dilatation (8). They are not the/considered an exact indication for echocardiography, but we suppose they should be. They could be diagnosed with an exact ausculta- tion of the heart and then referred to echocardiography. Like in previous studies (11, 22, 30, 31), mild pericardial effusion (PE) was a common finding in our study, but we could not establish a significant correlation between PE and the prog- nosis of patients. It has been established that vaccination can prevent severe COVID-19 cases, hospitalization, and mortality (32). Yet more research is needed to fully understand its capacity to prevent secondary complications like cardiac complications. In the follow-up phase, we could only find a significant de- crease in LVEF in non-fully vaccinated patients. Non-fully vaccinated patients might experience a different compen- satory pattern of cardiac recovery than vaccinated patients; further long-term follow-ups are needed to investigate this matter. In-line with our study, a recent study in South Ko- rea revealed that full vaccination against COVID-19 is corre- lated with a lower risk of acute myocardial infarction follow- ing COVID-19 infection (33). 5. Limitation There are some limitations in our study that should be men- tioned. In this study, we only included patients hospitalized due to COVID-19. Therefore, our inclusion criteria would limit the generalizability of the results to patients with mod- erate or severe diseases that need hospitalization. Echocar- diography is an operator-dependent tool and a potential source of bias. However, to reduce the measurement bias, an expert cardiologist who had a fellowship in echocardio- graphy designed the study and chose the variables with the lowest dependence on the operator. Also, all of the echocar- diograms were performed with the same device model and by the same person. Echocardiograms were performed on different days of hospitalization, and changes in echocardio- grams on different days are unclear. We performed follow-up echocardiograms only one month after discharge. Further studies to evaluate serial changes in echocardiograms after COVID-19 infection are recommended. 6. Conclusion Left ventricle wall hypokinesia, aorta valve stenosis, dilated IVC, and PASP ≥ 35 were predictors of in-hospital mortality in our study. While we did not see any potential clinically sig- nificant differences in one-month echocardiographic follow- ups of our patients, non-fully vaccinated patients might ex- perience a different compensatory pattern of cardiac recov- ery than vaccinated patients; yet, further long-term follow- ups are needed. 7. Declarations 7.1. Acknowledgments We appreciate all the medical staff at the department of cardiology, the department of infectious disease, COVID-19 ward, and ICU, including doctors, nurses, health care ex- perts, and staff. We also acknowledge the patients and their families for their cooperation. 7.2. Author contribution Study design and data gathering: All of authors. Analysis: SMMA Interpreting the results: All of authors Drafting: SMMA, SHM Critically revised: SHM, MK, AA, RA, AM All authors read and approved the final version of the paper to be submitted. 7.3. Conflict of interest The authors declare no conflict of interest. 7.4. Data Availability The datasets created and analyzed during the current study are accessible upon reasonable request from the correspond- ing author. 7.5. Funding None. This open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0). Downloaded from: http://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/aaem 7 Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine. 2022; 10(1): e85 References 1. Worldometers. COVID-19 CORON- AVIRUS PANDEMIC 2022 [Available from: https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/. 2. Habibi Z, Mosallami Aghili SM, Javadi SAH, Seifi A, Karimi Yarandi K, Dehghan Manshadi SA, et al. Clinical guideline of neurosurgical practice during the COVID-19 pandemic. Tehran Univ Med J. 2021;79(2):85-92. 3. Zare Dehnavi A, Salehi M, Arab Ahmadi M, Asgardoon MH, Ashrafi F, Ahmadinejad N, et al. Clinical, Laboratory and Imaging Characteristics of Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients with Neurologic Involvement; a Cross-Sectional Study. Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2022;10(1):e10. 4. Wang T, Du Z, Zhu F, Cao Z, An Y, Gao Y, et al. Comorbidi- ties and multi-organ injuries in the treatment of COVID- 19. Lancet. 2020;395(10228):e52. 5. Giustino G, Pinney SP, Lala A, Reddy VY, Johnston-Cox HA, Mechanick JI, et al. Coronavirus and cardiovascular disease, myocardial injury, and arrhythmia: JACC focus seminar. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76(17):2011-23. 6. Bavishi C, Bonow RO, Trivedi V, Abbott JD, Messerli FH, Bhatt DL. Acute myocardial injury in patients hospital- ized with COVID-19 infection: a review. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2020;63(5):682-9. 7. Abbasi J. Researchers investigate what COVID-19 does to the heart. JAMA. 2021;325(9):808-11. 8. Carrizales-Sepúlveda EF, Vera-Pineda R, Flores-Ramírez R, Hernández-Guajardo DA, Pérez-Contreras E, Lozano- Ibarra MM, et al. Echocardiographic Manifestations in COVID-19: A Review. Heart Lung Circ. 2021;30(8):1117- 29. 9. Pishgahi M, Karimi Toudeshki K, Safari S, Yousefifard M. Echocardiographic Abnormalities as Independent Prog- nostic Factors of In-Hospital Mortality among COVID-19 Patients. Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2021;9(1):e21. 10. Szekely Y, Lichter Y, Taieb P, Banai A, Hochstadt A, Merdler I, et al. Spectrum of cardiac manifestations in COVID-19: a systematic echocardiographic study. Circu- lation. 2020;142(4):342-53. 11. Dweck MR, Bularga A, Hahn RT, Bing R, Lee KK, Chap- man AR, et al. Global evaluation of echocardiography in patients with COVID-19. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020;21(9):949-58. 12. Chaturvedi H, Issac R, Sharma SK, Gupta R. Progressive left and right heart dysfunction in coronavirus disease- 19: Prospective echocardiographic evaluation. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022;23(3):319-25. 13. Fayol A, Livrozet M, Boutouyrie P, Khettab H, Betton M, Tea V, et al. Cardiac performance in patients hospitalized with COVID-19: a 6 month follow-up study. ESC Heart Fail. 2021;8(3):2232-9. 14. Moody WE, Liu B, Mahmoud-Elsayed HM, Senior J, Lalla SS, Khan-Kheil AM, et al. Persisting adverse ven- tricular remodeling in COVID-19 survivors: a longitu- dinal echocardiographic study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2021;34(5):562-6. 15. Xie Y, Xu E, Bowe B, Al-Aly Z. Long-term cardiovascular outcomes of COVID-19. Nat Med. 2022;28(3):583-90. 16. Iranian Society of Echocardiography. The Guideline of the Iranian Society of Echocardiography for Perform- ing Various Types of Echocardiography During COVID- 19 Pandemic. 2020. 17. Pellikka PA, Arruda-Olson A, Chaudhry FA, Chen MH, Marshall JE, Porter TR, et al. Guidelines for Performance, Interpretation, and Application of Stress Echocardiog- raphy in Ischemic Heart Disease: From the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2020;33(1):1-41.e8. 18. Aghili SMM, Ebrahimpur M, Arjmand B, Shadman Z, Pejman Sani M, Qorbani M, et al. Obesity in COVID- 19 era, implications for mechanisms, comorbidities, and prognosis: a review and meta-analysis. Int J Obes. 2021;45(5):998-1016. 19. Sharifi Y, Payab M, Mohammadi-Vajari E, Aghili SMM, Sharifi F, Mehrdad N, et al. Association between car- diometabolic risk factors and COVID-19 susceptibility, severity and mortality: a review. J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2021;20(2):1743-65. 20. Chung MK, Zidar DA, Bristow MR, Cameron SJ, Chan T, Harding III CV, et al. COVID-19 and cardiovascular dis- ease: from bench to bedside. Circ Res. 2021;128(8):1214- 36. 21. Sahranavard M, Akhavan Rezayat A, Zamiri Bidary M, Omranzadeh A, Rohani F, Hamidi Farahani R, et al. Car- diac Complications in COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Arch Iran Med. 2021;24(2):152-63. 22. Rath D, Petersen-Uribe Á, Avdiu A, Witzel K, Jaeger P, Zdanyte M, et al. Impaired cardiac function is associated with mortality in patients with acute COVID-19 infection. Clin Res Cardiol. 2020;109(12):1491-9. 23. Raman B, Bluemke DA, Lüscher TF, Neubauer S. Long COVID: post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 with a cardio- vascular focus. Eur Heart J. 2022;43(11):1157-72. 24. Pollack A, Kontorovich AR, Fuster V, Dec GW. Viral myocarditis—diagnosis, treatment options, and current controversies. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2015;12(11):670-80. 25. Blagova O, Varionchik N, Zaidenov V, Savina P, Sarkisova N. Anti-heart antibodies levels and their correlation with clinical symptoms and outcomes in patients with con- firmed or suspected diagnosis COVID-19. Eur J Immunol. 2021;51(4):893-902. 26. Dehghanbanadaki H, Aazami H, Shabani M, Amighi D, Seif F, Zare Dehnavi A, et al. A systematic review and This open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0). Downloaded from: http://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/aaem SM. Mosallami Aghili et al. 8 meta-analysis on the association between lymphocyte subsets and the severity of COVID-19. Immunopathol Persa. 2022;8(2):e29303-e. 27. Klok F, Kruip M, Van der Meer N, Arbous M, Gommers D, Kant K, et al. Incidence of thrombotic complications in critically ill ICU patients with COVID-19. Thromb Res. 2020;191:145-7. 28. Lippi G, Lavie CJ, Sanchis-Gomar F. Cardiac troponin I in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID- 19): Evidence from a meta-analysis. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2020;63(3):390-1. 29. Shi S, Qin M, Shen B, Cai Y, Liu T, Yang F, et al. Associa- tion of cardiac injury with mortality in hospitalized pa- tients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China. JAMA Cardiol. 2020;5(7):802-10. 30. Jain SS, Liu Q, Raikhelkar J, Fried J, Elias P, Poterucha TJ, et al. Indications for and findings on transthoracic echocardiography in COVID-19. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2020;33(10):1278-84. 31. Mahmoud-Elsayed HM, Moody WE, Bradlow WM, Khan- Kheil AM, Senior J, Hudsmith LE, et al. Echocardio- graphic findings in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. Can J Cardiol. 2020;36(8):1203-7. 32. Mohammed I, Nauman A, Paul P, Ganesan S, Chen K- H, Jalil SMS, et al. The efficacy and effectiveness of the COVID-19 vaccines in reducing infection, severity, hospi- talization, and mortality: a systematic review. Hum Vac- cin Immunother. 2022;18(1):2027160. 33. Kim Y-E, Huh K, Park Y-J, Peck KR, Jung J. Association Between Vaccination and Acute Myocardial Infarction and Ischemic Stroke After COVID-19 Infection. JAMA. 2022;328(9):887-9. This open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0). Downloaded from: http://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/aaem Introduction Methods Results Discussion Limitation Conclusion Declarations References