Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine. 2023; 11(1): e47 OR I G I N A L RE S E A RC H Basic Life Support (BLS) Knowledge Among General Pop- ulation; a Multinational Study in Nine Arab Countries Nour Shaheen1, Ahmed Shaheen1, Rehab Adel Diab2,9∗, Abdelrahman Mohmmed1, Abdelraouf Ramadan3, Sarya Swed4, Muhannad Wael5, Mrinmoy Kundu6, Sama Soliman7, Mohamed Elmasry1, Sheikh Shoib8,10,11,12 1. Alexandria University, Alexandria Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria, Egypt. 2. Al-Azhar University, Al-Azhar Faculty of Medicine, Cairo, Egypt. 3. Helwan University, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo, Egypt. 4. Faculty of Medicine, Aleppo University, Aleppo, Syria. 5. An Najah National University, Faculty of Medicine, Nablus, Palestine. 6. Institute of Medical Sciences & SUM Hospital, Bhubaneswar, India. 7. The Pavlov First State Medical University of St. Petersburg, Faculty of Medicine, St. Petersburg, Russia. 8. Department of Psychiatry, Jawahar Lal Nehru Memorial Hospital, Srinagar, Jammu & Kashmir, India. 9. Medical Research Group of Egypt, Cairo, Egypt. 10.Department of Health Services, Srinagar, 190001 India. 11.Sharda University, Greater Noida, India (SSh). 12.Psychosis Research Centre, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Received: May 2023; Accepted: June 2023; Published online: 11 July 2023 Abstract: Introduction: Basic Life Support (BLS) is a medical treatment used in life-threatening emergencies until the sufferer can be properly cared for by a team of paramedics or in a hospital. This study aimed to assess the level of knowledge regarding BLS and the contributing factors among the Arab non-medical population. Methods: An online survey-based cross-sectional study was conducted among non-medical populations in nine Arab countries between April 13, 2022, and June 30, 2022. The utilized questionnaire consisted of two parts: part one included socio-demographic charac- teristics and part two measured knowledge of BLS through an online survey. Results: The research included a total of 4465 participants. 2540 (56.89%) of the participants were knowledgeable about BLS. The mean basic life support knowl- edge scores of participants who received training were higher than those who had not (20.11 ± 4.20 vs. 16.96 ± 5.27; p< 0.01). According to the nations, Yemen scored the highest, while Morocco had the lowest levels of BLS knowledge (19.86 ± 4.71 vs. 14.15 ± 5.10, respectively; p< 0.01). Additionally, individuals who resided in urban areas scored on average higher than those who did in rural areas (17.86 ± 5.19 vs. 17.13 ± 5.24, p= 0.032) in understanding basic life support. Age, information sources, and previous training with theoretical and practical classes were significant predictors of BLS knowledge. Conclusion: The level of BLS knowledge among non-medical people in Arab nations is moderate but in- sufficient to handle the urgent crises that we face everywhere. In addition to physicians being required to learn the BLS principles, non-medical people should also be knowledgeable of the necessary actions to take in emergency events. Keywords: Awareness; basic life support; cardiopulmonary resuscitation Cite this article as: Shaheen N, Shaheen A, Adel Diab R, Mohmmed A, Ramadan A, et al. Basic Life Support (BLS) Knowledge Among General Population; a Multinational Study in Nine Arab Countries. Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2023; 11(1): e47. https://doi.org/10.22037/aaem.v11i1.1975. ∗Corresponding Author: Rehab Diab; Al-Azhar University, Al-Azhar Fac- ulty of Medicine, Cairo, Egypt. Tel: +20 127 245 1274Postal code: 44718, Email: radledeab@gmail.com; rehab_diab97research@outlook.com, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6552-4900. 1. Introduction Basic Life Support (BLS) is the first line of management for an illness or injury, generally by any bystander, until medi- cal intervention can be started (1). Patients’ survival prob- ability depends on early detection of symptoms, early ac- cess to emergency medical services, and early BLS provided This open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0). Downloaded from: https://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/aaem/index.php/AAEM/index N. Shaheen et al. 2 by bystanders. Additionally, studies have shown that BLS can reduce recurrence and complications of the disease (2). BLS standard includes recognition of sudden cardiac arrest (SCA), heart attacks, strokes, and foreign body airway ob- structions, as well as the use of automated external defibril- lators for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and defibril- lation (3). Certain illnesses or minor injuries can be treated with appropriate BLS without requiring medical consultation or risk of life loss (4). So, BLS knowledge should be adequate for individuals to deliver lifesaving measures in emergencies (5,6). In different communities, sudden cardiac arrest, the leading cause of death worldwide, is associated with vary- ing survival rates (7,8). Early recognition of cardiac arrest and initiating CPR reduce morbidity and mortality (7,9,10) In a previous study conducted in Arizona, bystander CPR rates increased from 28.2% to 39.9%, and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) survival rates increased from 3.7% to 9.8% following a statewide hands-only CPR campaign (11). In the United States, there are approximately 300,000 cases of OHCA, with a 92% mortality rate (11). BLS is performed by the first person to intervene, and using an AED doubles the chances of survival (11). There are several reasons by- standers have difficulty performing CPR: inadequate knowl- edge or training, a lack of skill or confidence, and a fear of le- gal action (11). In a study conducted in Saudi Arabia, which included 301 participants, only 39.2% passed the test that valued the theoretical knowledge of BLS even though the per- centage of participants with bachelor’s degrees exceeded 60% (12). Researchers conducted an observational study with 121 participants, including dental personnel, house officers, and nurses, and found that the average health care worker lacked adequate CPR and BLS knowledge (13). The same results were found in another study conducted at a medical school in Oman. Of 304 medical students, 53.6% had insufficient knowledge, and 64.5% had no previous BLS training. How- ever, the study stated that the students showed positive atti- tudes toward BLS training and were not hesitant to provide BLS to a stranger if needed (14). The community requires adequate training on BLS, either in person or online, to pro- vide proper care (15). Increasing public awareness and un- derstanding of how BLS works is essential for a successful outcome following an emergency. The knowledge and per- ception of BLS among the Arab community have not been assessed. In general, non-medical individuals do not receive formal training in BLS, leading to lack of knowledge. This study aimed to assess the level of knowledge regarding BLS and the contributing factors among the Arab non-medical population. 2. Methods 2.1. Study design and setting An online survey-based cross-sectional study was conducted among the non-medical population in most Arab coun- tries across social media ( Jordan, Iraq, Egypt, Palestine, Bahrain, Yemen, Syria, Sudan, Algeria, and Morocco) using an internet-based approach to communication (social me- dia) such as Facebook and Twitter from April 13, 2022, to June 30, 2022, to assess their knowledge about BLS. Two national collaborators distributed the survey, and a secure platform was used (Microsoft Forms Forms). Only the lead investiga- tor had access to the data; all responses were anonymous and devoid of identifying information. Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval was also obtained from the Research Ethics Clearance Committee of Gadarif Teaching Hospital. Consents were obtained from all partic- ipants before starting to fill out the online survey on the first page. All participating universities were provided with a re- port of data results and their interpretation, which may be used for educational program development. Furthermore, the study was performed adhering to the ethical principles introduced in the Declaration of Helsinki. 2.2. Participants The sample population was chosen through a convenience sampling method. Only Arab individuals over 18 who lived in the included countries and were not members of the med- ical field were included in our study; however, we excluded individuals under the age of 18 who did not reside in the in- cluded countries and members of the medical sector. After removing the duplicate entries, only fully completed replies were considered. 2.3. Data gathering The study questionnaire was adopted from a similar study conducted in Gondar Town (16). The questionnaire was translated into Arabic by a translator with a master’s degree. After three experts evaluated the Arabic and original versions, the translation was finalized. Cardiology professionals eval- uated the questionnaire’s clarity and validity, followed by a pilot study with a 10% sample size (approximately 300 partic- ipants). The whole data set did not include the pilot study’s sample data. As determined by Cronbach’s Alpha, internal consistency was 0.841 (0.8 to 0.9: good reliability). Partici- pants could go back and change their answers. The questionnaire (supplementary file 1) was divided into two sections: A socio-demographic section: Consisted of questions about personal information, including age, gender, nationality, ed- ucation, marital status, residence, job status, and whether the participant had previously received BLS training. This open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0). Downloaded from: https://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/aaem/index.php/AAEM/index 3 Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine. 2023; 11(1): e47 Knowledge of BLS: This section comprised general questions related to BLS definition and its principles including, the ad- equate time and person for performing it, knowledge of and recognizing the signs of cardiac arrest, such as being uncon- scious, absence of breathing, and absence of circulation, as well as the essential components of basic life support such as moving patients from accident site, stopping bleeding, ap- plying splinting for fractures, contacting emergency medical service, and transporting patients to hospitals, and the signs of airway problems, including noisy breathing, fast breath- ing, slow breathing, and no breathing, and the procedures to open airway or giving breath, including jaw thrust, head tilt and chin left, mouth to mouth, mouth to nose, and the signs of bleeding, including bleeding from the injured site, victim collapsing, weak and fast pulse, and increase in respiratory rate, and preventive measures to stop the bleeding including, applying tourniquet, applying pressure and dress, and lift the injured part above the body level, and finally, the preventive measures that should be performed during transporting the patient from the accident site to the hospital. The right answer was coded as "1," whereas the wrong an- swer or “I don’t know” answer was coded as "0." Following the addition of the right responses, individuals with scores above the mean were classified as having adequate knowl- edge of basic life support. In contrast, those with scores be- low the mean were categorized as having poor knowledge of basic life support. 2.4. Statistical analysis A single population proportion formula [n = [(Za/2)2. P (1- P)]/d2] was used to estimate the minimum sample size. P = percentage of non-medical people in Gondar Town, Ethiopia, who were knowledgeable about basic life support (44.4%) (16), assuming a 95% confidence level (Z a/2 = 1.96), a margin of error of 5%, and a 5% addition for non-response rate. The recommended sample size was 380 individuals. Participants were urged to fill out the online survey on Microsoft Forms, which received 4499 responses in total. After 34 participants indicated that they would not answer the questionnaire, the final sample size was 4465. After data collection, we used Excel to check the data and convert the string into codes. Then we exported the Excel sheet to SPSS version 28. We ran a descriptive analysis to de- scribe the frequency and percentages, and check if the data were normally distributed. Statistical tests such as the Shapiro-Wilk test were used to test normality. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to investigate the difference in BLS knowledge between groups defined by the independent variables. We used to compare the means between the dependent and independent vari- ables to calculate the mean and standard deviation. Finally, we used a stepwise multiple linear regression to define the best predictors of BLS knowledge and the variables used were age, gender, residence (rural vs urban), education, marital status, nationality, information source, whether respondent faced an emergency, whether received training or not, type of training and number of sessions of training. A P-value below 0.05 was considered a statistically significant value. Missing data is a common problem when conducting cross-sectional studies. Therefore, we used complete case analysis method where we excluded participants with missing data from anal- ysis. But to avoid bias that may occur if the missing data were not missed completely random, we conducted sensitiv- ity analysis to evaluate the potential impact of missing data on our study results to avoid bias as much as possible and in- crease the validity of our finding. In order to minimize the impact of different bias to the re- sults we took the following measures: firstly, we used a repre- sentative sampling method to select participants from a di- verse range of socioeconomic backgrounds and geographic locations. This helped to reduce selection bias by ensuring that the study population was as representative as possible of the target population. Second, we used standardized mea- surement tools and data collection procedures to ensure that all participants were evaluated in a consistent and uniform manner. This helped to reduce measurement bias and en- sure that the results were comparable across participants. Third, we carefully considered and controlled for potential confounding variables that may have influenced the relation- ship between the exposure and outcome variables. For ex- ample, we controlled for age, gender, education level, and other relevant demographic factors that may have impacted our results. Finally, we conducted a sensitivity analysis to evaluate the potential impact of any unmeasured or residual confounding variables that may have influenced our results. 3. Results 3.1. Socio-demographic characteristics of par- ticipants Among a total of 4465 study participants, the most frequent age group was 12-24 years (n= 2143 (48.0%)), while the least frequent age group was >65 years (n= 65 (1.5%)). Study in- cluded 2657(59.5%) females, 3561(79.8%) urban residents, and 2867 (64.2%) single participants. A large proportion of study participants (3404 (76.2%)) did not take any training regarding BLS. Among participants, 2110 (47.3%) had heard about BLS. Furthermore, 1113 (29.2%) participants faced a case that required BLS. The study included more than nine Arab countries, with the largest proportion of respondents coming from Jordan, 850 (19.0%) (Table 1). This open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0). Downloaded from: https://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/aaem/index.php/AAEM/index N. Shaheen et al. 4 3.2. Knowledge of Basic Life Support (BLS) Among 4465 participants who took part in the study, 2540 (56.89%) were knowledgeable about BLS. Trained partici- pants possessed higher BLS knowledge scores than those who had not been trained (20.11 ± 4.20 vs. 16.96 ± 5.27; p =0.01). Moreover, participants who resided in urban ar- eas had a significantly higher mean score of BLS knowledge than those from rural areas (17.86 ± 5.19 vs. 17.13 ± 5.24; p= 0.03). Yemeni participants scored the highest mean score on BLS knowledge, while Morocco scored the least (19.86 ± 4.71 vs.14.15 ± 5.10; p <0.01). Health-sector employees scored the highest mean of BLS knowledge (20.27 ± 4.28). Also, previous BLS training sessions affected their score greatly to be signif- icantly higher than those who did not get any previous train- ing (20.11 ± 4.20 vs16.96 ± 5.27- p= 0.02; Table 2 and Figure 1). Furthermore, the individuals that are knowledgeable about the BLS were mostly Yemeni (19%) and Jordanian (17%) par- ticipants (Figure 2). 3.3. Factors associated with knowledge of par- ticipants about BLS A stepwise multiple linear regression analysis was performed to build a significant model with a p-value <0 .001 and an R- squared value of 0.91, which means the model can explain 91% of the variance in the BLS knowledge score. No viola- tions of linearity were detected. Age, information sources, and previous training with theoretical and practical classes were significant predictors of BLS knowledge. Receiving information about BLS from reading sources and health professionals was associated with better BLS knowl- edge scores than other information sources. Additionally, age groups 45-54 and 55-64 are better predictors of a higher BLS knowledge score than other age groups (Table 3). 4. Discussion The present study aimed to evaluate the knowledge of BLS among the general public in several Arab countries. A total of 4465 participants were included in the study, represent- ing a diverse range of socio-demographic characteristics. Re- sults of the study revealed that 56.89% of the participants had adequate knowledge about BLS, with prior training and age being the most significant factors impacting the degree of knowledge. The study found that a large proportion of participants (76.2%) did not receive any training regarding BLS, and only 47.3% of participants had previously heard about BLS. Addi- tionally, only 30.1% of participants had faced a case that re- quired BLS. These findings suggest that there is a significant gap in the knowledge and understanding of BLS among the general public in the Arab countries included in the study. The results also revealed that urban dwellers and those who had previously received BLS training had higher mean scores than those who did not. Furthermore, being an employed male participant and residing in age groups (45-54) and (55- 64) were the factors contributing most to BLS knowledge. Older male participants and those who had more exposure to such situations had higher knowledge scores in BLS. In terms of country-specific results, participants from Yemen scored the highest mean score on BLS knowledge, while par- ticipants from Morocco scored the lowest. This suggests that there may be significant variation in the knowledge and un- derstanding of BLS among different Arab countries, high- lighting the need for targeted interventions to improve BLS knowledge in specific countries. The study also found that receiving information about BLS from reading sources and health professionals was associ- ated with better BLS knowledge scores than other informa- tion sources. This highlights the importance of providing ac- curate and accessible information about BLS to the general public through various media sources. Training raises awareness, which contributes to raising the degree of knowledge compared to individuals who never get training, as documented in previous research, and this may be confirmed by the fact that trained personnel performed better than untrained personnel in the study (12,15,17-20). A crucial argument is that, despite certain participants’ exper- tise and experience, it is unfair for them to get involved in the situation or administer CPR unless they have a legal obliga- tion to do so (20). Study results showed that older participants who aged more than 45 years had higher knowledge scores than younger participants. This finding is consistent with the findings of the Saudi Arabia research, which revealed that older partic- ipants had greater knowledge scores than younger partici- pants, even though the majority of the samples gathered are from younger age groups. Older persons have been exposed to more cases that need BLS as they have aged (18). In this research, male participants had greater knowledge scores than females. even though there were more women than men in the population. The findings of this research may be attributed to the cultural and societal factors present in the Middle Eastern nations where the study was conducted. Specifically, the conserva- tive nature of these societies may have led to a higher level of knowledge and exposure to relevant scenarios among males, as compared to females. This is supported by the findings of a previous study conducted in Portugal, which also highlighted the role of work environments in providing opportunities for exposure and the exchange of information related to these situations among males (21). The present study found that knowledge of Basic Life Support (BLS) is greater among urban inhabitants as compared to ru- ral ones. This difference may be attributed to the fact that ur- This open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0). Downloaded from: https://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/aaem/index.php/AAEM/index 5 Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine. 2023; 11(1): e47 ban populations tend to have higher levels of education and better access to educational resources, including BLS train- ing programs. Conversely, rural populations may have lim- ited access to educational resources, and poor educational abilities, which can impede their ability to learn from various sources such as reading. Furthermore, urban communities have greater access to shareable information, including me- dia sources, which may have contributed to their increased knowledge of BLS. Additionally, the study found that individuals who were em- ployed performed better on the BLS knowledge test than those who were unemployed. This is likely due to the fact that those working earn greater wages, which allow them to afford to attend BLS courses and receive training. However, the high tuition for these courses may prevent unemployed individ- uals from enrolling, highlighting the need for government- funded initiatives to provide BLS training to fill the gap cre- ated by discrepancies in wages and educational levels (22). The study also found that participants in the healthcare in- dustry performed better than those in other occupations, which may be due to the nature of their work and its impact on their knowledge of BLS. Furthermore, the study found that having access to the media and the internet may be a key factor in determining the response rate, which could explain why the response rate was greater in Jordan and lower in Iraq. However, Yemen had the highest mean score, with only 8% of participants coming from Yemen classified as having poor knowledge of BLS. Conversely, participants from Egypt, Jordan, and Syria comprised 51% of this total. Additionally, Yemen had a higher mean score than any other nation be- cause it is a war-torn nation with a greater need for basic life support than other nations (23). This study showed a higher percentage of the population who had knowledge regarding the BLS compared to some stud- ies conducted on non-medical staff such as those performed in Addis Ababa (17) among kindergarten teachers, Iran (24) within a school environment, and Saudi Arabia over the gen- eral population (18), which reported 40.0%, 45.8%, 40.3% knowledgeable population, respectively; closer to percent- ages reported in other studies conducted in Addis Ababa (25) among medical and non-medical students and Saudi Arabia among rural mothers (26), which reported 50.3% and 50.0% knowledgeable population, respectively; in line with results reported in a study conducted in China among elderly pop- ulation (27) with 57.3%; and lower than the percentage re- ported in Egypt among rural mothers (19) with 74.3% of par- ticipants showing a considerable knowledge regarding BLS. The variations are caused by different tools and cut-off points. Variations in the educational backgrounds of in- cluded individuals also play an essential role in their aware- ness. 5. Recommendations Based on the findings of the present study, recommendations for improving BLS knowledge and understanding among the general public in Arab countries include: • Providing affordable and accessible BLS training courses to the general public • Raising public awareness of the importance of BLS through various media sources • Targeted interventions to improve BLS knowledge in spe- cific countries with lower scores • Encouraging health professionals to provide information and education on BLS to the general public • Promoting policies and initiatives that make it easier for people to access BLS training. The present study highlights the need for targeted interven- tions to improve the knowledge and understanding of BLS among the general public in Arab countries. By making BLS training more accessible and affordable, raising public awareness of the importance of BLS, and providing accurate and accessible information about BLS through various me- dia sources, it is possible to improve BLS knowledge and un- derstanding among the general public, ultimately leading to better outcomes in emergency situations. 6. Limitations The present study has several limitations that should be ac- knowledged. Firstly, the study was conducted solely in Arab countries and may not be generalizable to other populations or regions. Additionally, the study relied on self-reported data, which may introduce bias and inaccuracies in the re- sults. Furthermore, the study did not assess the practical skills and abilities of the participants in performing BLS, only their knowledge and understanding of the subject. It would be important to conduct further research to evaluate the practical skills and abilities of the general public in perform- ing BLS. Additionally, the study only measured the knowl- edge and understanding of BLS among the general public and did not assess the knowledge and understanding of BLS among healthcare professionals. Future research could also focus on evaluating the knowledge and understanding of BLS among healthcare professionals in Arab countries. Fi- nally, the study relied on online surveys, which may not have reached individuals without internet access or those who were not comfortable taking online surveys. This could have resulted in a selection bias and may have affected the repre- sentativeness of the sample. 7. Conclusion Results showed that 56.89% of participants had adequate knowledge about BLS, and that factors such as previous This open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0). Downloaded from: https://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/aaem/index.php/AAEM/index N. Shaheen et al. 6 training and age were associated with higher BLS knowl- edge scores. The study also found that urban residents and those who had received BLS training had higher mean scores than those who had not. Additionally, being an employed male participant and belonging to the age groups of 45-54 and 55-64 were found to be factors that contributed most to BLS knowledge. The study highlights the need for measures such as making BLS courses more accessible and affordable, and raising public awareness about the importance of BLS through various media sources in order to increase the num- ber of people with adequate knowledge about BLS. Over- all, the study suggests that while the level of BLS knowledge among non-medical individuals in Arab countries is moder- ate, it is still insufficient to handle emergency situations, and there is a need for further education and training to ensure that individuals are prepared to respond in emergency situa- tions. 8. Declarations 8.1. Acknowledgments We would like to express our gratitude to the Data Collection group for their valuable contribution to this project. Their efforts in collecting and organizing the necessary data have been instrumental in the success of our research. We greatly appreciate their assistance and dedication throughout the data collection process. 8.2. Conflict of interest The authors declare that they have no competing interests. 8.3. Funding and support None. 8.4. Authors’ contribution Nour Shaheen: Conceptualization, Methodology, Formal Analysis, Writing-Original draft, review, and editing. Ahmed Shaheen, Rehab Adel Diab, Abdelrahman Mohmmed, Ab- delraouf Ramadan, Sarya Swed, Muhannad Wael, Mrinmoy Kundu, Sama Soliman, Mohamed Elmasry, Sheikh Shoib: Writing-Review and editing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. 8.5. Data Availability The data supporting this study’s findings are available from the first author, [Nour Shaheen], upon reasonable request. 8.6. Ethical Approval The study was performed in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Ethical approval was also obtained from the Research Ethics Clearance Committee of Gadarif Teaching Hospital. Con- sents were obtained from all participants before starting to fill out the online survey. 8.7. Data collection group Moyasar Awad, Mostafa K. Abd El-Aziz, Yasmeen Abouainain, Mohammed Amir Rais, Assia Salah, Heba Cheikh Othman, M. Ali Farho, Buthaina Albalta, Mohammad Ghannam, Zainab Ayoob, Amina Qambar, Amal Fakhoury, Mahmoud Douden, Mohammad Alzu’bi, Sara Hosny, Amani Lutf. References 1. Kleinman ME, Goldberger ZD, Rea T, Swor RA, Bo- brow BJ, Brennan EE, Terry M, Hemphill R, Gazmuri RJ, Hazinski MF, et al. 2017 American Heart Association Fo- cused Update on Adult Basic Life Support and Cardiopul- monary Resuscitation Quality: An Update to the Amer- ican Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Cir- culation. 2018; 137(1):e7–13. 2. Jarrah S, Judeh M, AbuRuz ME. Evaluation of public awareness, knowledge and attitudes towards basic life support: a cross-sectional study. BMC Emerg Med. 2018; 18(1) :1–7. 3. 2005 American Heart Association Guidelines for Car- diopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovas- cular Care. Circulation. 2005;112(24_supplement):IV-1- IV-5. 4. Woyessa AH, Dibaba BY, Hirko GF, Palanichamy T. Spec- trum, Pattern, and Clinical Outcomes of Adult Emer- gency Department Admissions in Selected Hospitals of Western Ethiopia: A Hospital-Based Prospective Study. Emerg. Med. Int. 2019(12):1-10. 5. Bhanji F, Donoghue AJ, Wolff MS, Flores GE, Halamek LP, Berman JM, Sinz EH, Cheng A. Part 14: Education: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Car- diopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovas- cular Care. Circulation. 2015 Oct 20 ;132(18): S561–73. 6. Aroor AR, Saya RP, Attar NR, Saya GK, Ravinanthanan M. Awareness about basic life support and emergency med- ical services and its associated factors among students in a tertiary care hospital in South India. J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2014 ;7(3):166. 7. Sasson C, Rogers MA, Dahl J, Kellermann AL. Predictors of survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a system- atic review and meta-analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Out- comes. 2010 Jan ;3(1):63–81. 8. Eckstein M, Stratton SJ, Chan LS. Cardiac Arrest Resusci- tation Evaluation in Los Angeles: CARE-LA. Ann Emerg Med. 2005;45(5):504–9. 9. Bobrow BJ, Spaite DW, Berg RA, Stolz U, Sanders AB, Kern This open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0). Downloaded from: https://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/aaem/index.php/AAEM/index 7 Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine. 2023; 11(1): e47 KB, Vadeboncoeur TF, Clark LL, Gallagher JV, Stapczynski JS, et al. Chest compression-only CPR by lay rescuers and survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Jama. 2010 Oct 6 ;304(13):1447–54. 10. Roger VL, Go AS, Lloyd-Jones DM, Adams RJ, Berry JD, Brown TM, Carnethon MR, Dai S, de Simone G, Ford ES, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics–2011 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2011; 123(4): e18-e209. 11. Mori S, Whitaker IY, Marin HDF. Evaluation of an ed- ucational website on First Aid. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2013;47(4):950–7. 12. Subki AH, Mortada HH, Alsallum MS, Alattas AT, Almalki MA, Hindi MM, Subki SH, Alhejily WA. Basic Life Support Knowledge Among a Nonmedical Population in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia: Cross-Sectional Study. Interact J Med Res. 2018 Nov 28 ;7(2): e10428. 13. Roshana S, Kh B, Rm P, Mw S. Basic life support: knowl- edge and attitude of medical/paramedical professionals. World J Emerg Med. 2012 ;3(2):141. 14. Albadi S, Al-Hadi H, Nadar SK. Knowledge and Attitudes toward Basic Life Support among Medical Students in Oman. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2020;24(7):599. 15. Arbon P, Hayes J, Woodman R. First aid and harm mini- mization for victims of road trauma: a population study. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2011;26(4):276–82. 16. Mekonnen CK, Muhye AB. Basic Life Support Knowledge and Its Associated Factors Among a Non-Medical Pop- ulation in Gondar Town, Ethiopia. Open Access Emerg Med. 2020; 12:323–31. 17. Ganfure G, Ameya G, Tamirat A, Lencha B, Bikila D. First aid knowledge, attitude, practice, and associated factors among kindergarten teachers of Lideta sub-city Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. PLoS One. 2018;13(3): P03012–P03012. 18. Midani O, Tillawi T, Saqer A, Hammami MB, Taifour H, Mohammad H. Knowledge and attitude toward first aid: A cross-sectional study in the United Arab Emirates. Avi- cenna J Med. 2019;9:1-7. 19. Khalil N. Knowledge, attitude and practice of rural moth- ers towards home injuries among children under 5 years of age in Menouf District- Menoufia Governorate, Egyp- njuries paper. MMJ. 2016;29(4):1033. 20. Kuah BT. Medico-legal issues in cardiopulmonary resuscitation and defibrillation. Singapore Med J. 2011;52(8):642-3. 21. Dixe MDACR, Gomes JCR. Knowledge of the Portuguese population on Basic Life Support and availability to at- tend training. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2015;49(4):636–44. 22. Gad S. Health awareness campaigns on the Egyp- tian Ministry of Health pages on social media. The Egyptian Journal of Media Research. 2021 Oct 1;2021(77):1059–113. 23. Gulland A. MSF calls for urgent help for war torn Yemen. Bmj. . 2015 Aug 11;351:h4366. 24. Adib-Hajbaghery M, Kamrava Z. Iranian teachers’ knowl- edge about first aid in the school environment. Chin J Traumatol. 2019;22(4):240. 25. Alsayali Rm, Althubaiti AQA, Altowairqi RM. Awareness, Knowledge, Attitude and Practices of First Aid Skills among Medical and Non-Medical Students at Taif Uni- versity. WFM/ MEJFM. 2019 ;17(11):34–43. 26. Eldesouky R. Home-related injuries among children: Knowledge, attitudes and practice about first aid among rural mothers. East Mediterr Health J. 2012 Oct;18(10):1021-7. 27. Sun W, Liu Y, Yan G, Meng W, Dong F. Research on present situation of pre-hospital first-aid knowledge of the el- derly in community in Jilin. BIO Web of Conferences. 2017;8:01010. This open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0). Downloaded from: https://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/aaem/index.php/AAEM/index N. Shaheen et al. 8 Table 1: Socio-demographic characteristics of the studied samples (N=4465) Variables Values Variables Values Age (years) Nationality 12-24 2143 (48.0) Jordanian 850 (19.0) 25-34 1213 (27.43) Egyptian 553 (12.4) 35-44 570 (12.8) Palestinian 473 (10.6) 45-54 344 (7.7) Bahraini 420 (9.4) 55-64 130 (2.9) Yemeni 633 (14.2) Above 65 65 (1.5) Syrian 488 (10.9) Gender Algerian 401 (9.0) Male 1765 (39.5) Sudani 490 (11.0) Female 2657 (59.5) Moroccan 60 (1.3) Residency Other 97 (2.2) Urban 3561 (79.8) Job status Rural 904 (20.2) Unemployed 511 (11.4) Education Entrepreneur/freelancer 992 (22.2) PhD 9 (0.2) Employed 1338 (30.0) Masters 52 (1.2) Health-sector employee 631 (14.1) University degree 3759 (84.2) Student 898 (20.1) Professional diploma 31 (0.7) Retired 75 (1.7) High school 5 (0.1) BLS training Secondary education 582 (13.0) Yes 1061 (23.8) Primary education 17 (0.4) No 3404 (76.2) Other 10 (0.2) Ever heard about BLS Marital status Yes 2110 (47.3) Married 1514 (33.9) No 2355 (52.7) Single 2867 (64.2) Facing a person in need of BLS Widowed 84 (1.9) Yes 1344 (30.1) Data are presented as frequency (%). PhD: Doctorate of Philosophy; BLS: basic life support. This open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0). Downloaded from: https://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/aaem/index.php/AAEM/index 9 Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine. 2023; 11(1): e47 Figure 1: Point-plots of association between age groups and score in the study taking into account whether the participant received training in (A) and faced an emergency requiring BLS or not (B). This open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0). Downloaded from: https://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/aaem/index.php/AAEM/index N. Shaheen et al. 10 Figure 2: Countries of people who had sufficient knowledge of basic life support among studied Arab countries. This open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0). Downloaded from: https://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/aaem/index.php/AAEM/index 11 Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine. 2023; 11(1): e47 Supplementary Table 1: English version of the questionnaire PART ONE: Socio-Demographic and General Information Q1. Age ————— Q 2. Gender 1. Male 2. Female Q3. Residence? 1. Urban 2. Rural Q4. Educational status 1. No formal education 2. Formal education Q 5. Marital status? 1. married 2. Single 3. Widowed 4. Divorced Q6. Religious? 1. Muslim 2. Christian 3. Jewish 5. Others Q 7. Did you take basic life support training before? 1. Yes 2. No Q8. Type of training? 1. Theoretical training 2. Practical training 3. Both Q9. The number of training sessions before? 1. One 2. Two 3. Three or more Q10. If your answer to question no - 9 ’is yes, ’where were you trained? Q11. Did you hear about basic life support? 1. Yes 2. No Q12. If yes, for Q-11 source of information? 1. Reading materials 2. Media 3. Health professionals 4. Friends and relatives Q13. Did you get an emergency case that needs basic life support? 1. Yes 2.No PART TWO: Knowledge Questions Q1. When should basic life support be given during an accident? 1. Immediately 2. In Hospital. 3. I don’t know Q2. Who should give basic life support during an accident? 1. Health care worker 2. Community policy 3. Scene bystanders including Community. 4. I don’t know Q3. Is being unconscious a sign of cardiac arrest? 1. Yes 2. No 3. I don’t know Q4. If you answered yes for Q-3, how can you have recognized unconsciousness? 1. No reaction to voice 2. No reaction to touch 3. No movements 4. Don’t know Q5. Is the absence of breathing a sign of cardiac arrest? 1. Yes 2. No Q6. If you yes for Q-5, how can you recognize the absence of breathing? 1. No breathing moves 2. No breathing sound 3. No expired air 4. Mirror in front of victim’s mouth 5. Don’t know Q7. Is the absence of circulation a sign of cardiac arrest? 1. Yes 2. No Q8. If Yes for Q-7, how can you recognize absence of circulation? 1. Palpation of neck arteries 2. Palpation of arm arteries 3. I don’t know Q9. Moving patients from accident sites is a component of basic life support 1. Yes 2. No 3. I don’t know Q10. Stopping bleeding is a component of basic life support. 1. Yes 2. No 3. I don’t know Q11. Applying to splint for fractures is a component of basic life support 1. Yes 2. No 3. I don’t know Q12. Communicate to emergency medical service -939 is a component of basic life 1. Yes 2. No 3. I don’t know Q13. Transporting patients to hospitals is a component of basic life support 1. Yes 2. No 3. I don’t know Q14. Noisy breathing is a sign of airway problem for the victim 1. Yes 2. No 3. I don’t know Q15. Fast breathing is a sign of an airway problem for the victim 1. Yes 2. No 3. I don’t know Q16. Slow breathing is a sign of airway problem for the victim 1. Yes 2. No 3. I don’t know Q17. No breathing is a sign of an airway problem for the victim 1. Yes 2. No 3. I don’t know Q18. Jaw thrust is a procedure used to open the airway of victims 1. Yes 2. No 3. I don’t know Q19. Head tilt and chin left is a procedure used to open the airway for accident victims 1. Yes 2. No 3. I don’t know Q20. Mouth to mouth is used for giving breath 1. Yes 2. No 3. I don’t know Q21. The mouth to the nose is used for giving breath 1. Yes 2. No 3. I don’t know Q22. Keep the person’s neck and back straight with your hand while shifting a patient to the hospital, a thing you should always assume if the cervical injury is present 1. Yes 2. No 3. I don’t know Q23. Keep the person’s neck and back straight with a hardboard while shifting a patient to the hospital, a thing you should always assume if the cervical injury is present 1. Yes 2. No 3. I don’t know Q24. If there is only a limb injury, the patient is transferred in a sitting position while shifting a patient to the hospital, a thing you should always assume if the cervical injury is present 1. Yes 2. No 3. I don’t know Q25.Bleeding from the injured site is a sign of hemorrhage 1. Yes 2. No 3. I don’t know Q26.Victim becoming collapse is the sign of bleeding from the injured site 1. Yes 2. No 3. I don’t know Q27.Weak and Fast pulse and increased respiratory rate is the sign of bleeding from the injured site 1. Yes 2. No 3. I don’t know Q28.Applying tourniquet is important to stop bleeding 1. Yes 2. No 3. I don’t know Q29. Applying pressure and pressing are important to stop bleeding 1. Yes 2. No 3. I don’t know Q30. Lifting the injured part above the body level is important to stop bleeding. 1. Yes 2. No 3. I don’t know This open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0). Downloaded from: https://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/aaem/index.php/AAEM/index N. Shaheen et al. 12 Table 2: The mean knowledge score of participants regarding ba- sic life support (BLS) based on different socio-demographic variables (N=4465) Variables Values P-value Age (years) 18-24 17.38 ± 5.22 25-34 18.25 ± 5.30 35-44 17.53 ± 5.23 <0.001 45-54 18.03 ± 4.86 55-64 18.42 ± 4.70 ≥65 17.25 ± 4.58 Gender Female 17.54 ± 5.06 Male 17.97 ± 5.35 <0.026 Rather not say 17.63 ± 7.48 Residency Urban 17.86 ± 5.19 <0.001 Rural 17.13 ± 5.24 Education University degree 17.77 ± 5.20 Secondary education 17.22 ± 5.08 Master 17.96 ± 5.17 <0.222 Professional diploma 17.32 ± 7.11 Primary education 19.29 ± 6.36 Other 18.20 ± 3.74 PhD 19.56 ± 5.21 High school 19.60 ± 3.20 Marital Status Single 17.62 ± 5.22 Married 17.89 ± 5.19 <0.272 Widowed 17.65 ± 4.77 Country Jordan 17.12 ± 4.92 Yemen 19.86 ± 4.71 Egypt 16.32 ± 5.55 Sudan 18.60 ± 4.90 <0.001 Syria 16.79 ± 5.00 Palestine 17.33 ± 5.36 Bahrain 18.74 ± 5.53 Algeria 17.68 ± 4.52 Other 16.82 ± 5.45 Morocco 14.15 ± 5.10 Job Status Employed 17.42 ± 5.31 Entrepreneur/freelancer 17.32 ± 5.34 Student 17.26 ± 5.21 Health-sector employee 20.27 ± 4.28 <0.001 Unemployed 16.88 ± 5.02 Retired 17.48 ± 4.13 Other 18.32 ± 2.15 BLS training No 16.96 ± 5.27 <0.001 Yes 20.11 ± 4.20 Training Type Both 20.57 ± 3.95 Theoretical training 19.07 ± 4.49 <0.001 Practical training 19.36 ± 4.63 Sessions of training Three or more 20.68 ± 4.13 One 19.77 ± 4.30 Two 19.70 ± 4.04 Table 2: The mean knowledge score of participants regarding ba- sic life support (BLS) based on different socio-demographic variables (N=4465) Variables Values P-value Heard about BLS before No 16.25 ± 5.41 <0.001 Yes 19.35 ± 4.43 BLS information source Health professionals 20.12 ± 3.91 Media 18.18 ± 4.99 <0.001 Reading materials 20.09 ± 4.10 Friends and relatives 18.46 ± 4.35 Facing a person in need of BLS No 17.19 ± 5.32 <0.001 Yes 18.92 ± 4.71 Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. This open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0). Downloaded from: https://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/aaem/index.php/AAEM/index 13 Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine. 2023; 11(1): e47 Table 3: Linear logistic regression analysis of the independent predictive factors regarding knowledge of basic life support among the studied participants Variables Coefficient 95 % CI P value Lower Upper Information source Friends and relatives 2.0545 1.407 2.702 <0.001 Health professionals 2.6418 2.148 3.136 <0.001 Age (year) 18-24 16.1967 15.946 16.447 <0.001 25-34 16.6735 16.342 17.005 <0.001 35-44 16.4983 16.051 16.945 <0.001 45-54 17.0346 16.463 17.606 <0.001 55-64 17.2053 16.282 18.129 <0.001 Reading materials 3.3382 2.817 3.860 <0.001 Training mode 1.9145 1.419 2.410 <0.001 Data are presented with 95% confidence interval (CI). This open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0). Downloaded from: https://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/aaem/index.php/AAEM/index Introduction Methods Results Discussion Recommendations Limitations Conclusion Declarations References