Emergency (****); * (*): *-* This open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0). Copyright © 2015 Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences. All rights reserved. Downloaded from: www.jemerg.com 155 Emergency (2015); 3 (4): 155-158 ORIGINAL RESEARCH Non-Judicial Hanging in Guilan Province, Iran between 2011 and 2013 Vahid Monsef Kasmaee, Behzad Zohrevandi*, Payman Asadi, Negar Shakouri Road trauma Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran *Corresponding Author: Behzad Zohrevandi; Road trauma Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran. Tel: +989188523847. Fax: +981313238373; Email: bzohrevandi@yahoo.com Received: January 2015; Accepted: March 2015 Abstract Introduction: Hanging is one of the most commonly used way to commit suicide in many countries. This method used in suicide is considered a problem in Iran too, but no clear data exists regarding hanging in different regions or the country as a whole. Because of the epidemiologic differences in non-judicial hanging in different regions, this study aimed to assess it in Gilan province, Iran between 2011 and 2013. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, profiles of hanging cases registered in Poorsina hospital in Gilan, Iran between 2011 and 2013 were evaluated. Age, sex, marital status, place of residency, level of education, occupation, history of suicide, history of clinical illness, season of suicide and hanging outcome were evaluated. Results: 59 cases of hanging (mean age 31.4 ± 13.1 years and 83.0% male) were evaluated. 12 (20.34%) suffered from psychological disorders, and 9 (15.2%) confessed to substance abuse. 7 (11.9%) had a history of suicide attempts by hanging. Hanging was significantly higher in men (p<0.001), people with an education level of less than high school diploma (p=0.02) and the unemployed (p<0.05) patients. In the end, 20 (33.9%) of these attempts resulted in death. Conclusion: The results of this study showed that in 2 years, 59 cases committed suicide by hanging themselves, 33.9% of which finally died. Committing suicide by hanging was significantly more prevalent in men, people with an education level of less than high school diploma and the unemployed. Key words: Suicide; outcome assessment; hanging Cite this article as: Monsef Kasmaee V, Zohrevandi B, Asadi P, Shakouri N. Non-judicial hanging in Gilan province, Iran between 2011 and 2013. Emergency. 2015;3(4):155-8. Introduction: uicide is one of the most complex aspects of human life, many features of which is still not fully identi- fied. This phenomenon seems to be restricted to the human race and has not been seen in any other being. It is a conscious move that leads to ending one’s life (1- 4). About 1 million people commit suicide worldwide each year and it is predicted that this number will reach 1.5 million people a year by 2020 (5). World health or- ganization (WHO) estimates that for each suicide, 10-20 cases of suicide attempt occurs with the most prevalence in the youth and women (6). In Iran, the rate of suicide has changed from 1.3 in 100,000 people in 1984 to 6.4 in 100,000 people in 2003 (7). Also estimations in 19 prov- inces of Iran have shown that in the 10-14 age group, for each recorded suicide there has been 80 cases of suicide attempt (8). Hanging is one of the most commonly used methods for suicide as it is a simple but effective way. As Gunnellet et al. have expressed, the mortality rate is at least 70% (9). A study based on the data from WHO in 56 countries showed that 53% of the suicides in men and 39% in women is by hanging. In England and Wales, about half of the suicides in men aged 15-44 are carried out this way. In Iran, reports by forensic service showed that the most common method used among men who died from suicide was hanging (56.05%) (10). Though the preva- lence of this method is low compared to other countries such as the United States, it is still high. It is considered a problem in Iran’s health system but no clear data exists regarding hanging in different regions or the country as a whole (11-13). Because of the mentioned points and the epidemiologic differences in non-judicial hanging in different regions, this study aimed to assess non-judicial hanging in Guilan, Iran between 2011 and 2013. Methods: This cross-sectional study assessed the epidemiological pattern of suicide cases with the hanging method who were admitted to Poorsina Hospital, Rasht, Iran from 2011 to 2013. The study protocol has been approved by S This open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0). Copyright © 2015 Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences. All rights reserved. Downloaded from: www.jemerg.com Monsef Kasmaee et al 156 the ethics committee of Guilan University of Medical Sci- ences. The patients have participated voluntary and the written consent form was signed by either the patient or their guardian. The researchers abided by the principles of Helsinki convention over the course of the research and patients’ data were kept confidential. All the patients that had attempted to hang themselves were included. Exclusion criteria included not willing to take part in the study and judicial hanging. Data were gathered using a checklist. Age, sex, marital status, place of residency, level of education, occupation, history of suicide, history of illness, season of suicide, hanging outcome (death or Survived). The data were gathered by a physician who had been trained to fill out medical research checklists. Sample size was calculated to represent the general pop- ulation on the basis of 50% hanging resulted in death, 10% precision, and 95% confidence interval. Thus, sam- ple size was estimated at 49. Data were analyzed using SPSS 21.0. Quantitative data were reported as mean ± standard deviation and qualitative data were expressed as frequency and percentage. In evaluating the relation- ship between sex, marital status, level of education, place of residency, and occupation with committing suicide, multinomial logistic regression test was used. In the end, to assess the relationship between the outcome (death or Survived) with the demographic characteristics, Mann-Whitney (for quantitative and ordinal qualitative data), chi square and the fisher exact test (for nominal qualitative data) were used. P < 0.05 was considered as significance. Results: Finally, 59 cases of hanging were referred to the hospi- tal. Mean age of the patients was 31.4 ± 13.1 years (age range of 12-80 years). 83% were male. 30 (50.8%) pa- tients were married and 35 (64.3%) cases lived in the city. 12 (20.34%) patients suffered from psychological disorders, and 9 (15.2%) patients confessed to sub- stance abuse. 7 (11.9%) subjects had a history of com- mitting suicide and 22 (37.3%) of the suicide attempts were done in fall (Tables 1 and 2). Suicide attempts by hanging was significantly higher in men (p<0.001), peo- ple with an education level of less than high school di- ploma (p=0.02), and the unemployed (p<0.05). In the end, 20 (33.9%) cases of these attempts resulted in death. Table 3 shows the relationship between demo- graphic factors of the patients with suicide outcome. None of these factors had any correlation with the out- come (p > 0.05). Discussion: The results of this study showed that in 2 years, 59 peo- ple attempted suicide by hanging. Hanging was more prevalent among men, people with an education level of less than high school diploma and the unemployed pa- tients. In the end 33.9% of these attempts resulted in death. Hanging is a way of suicide with a mortality rate of at least 70% as Gunnellet et al. have shown. These re- searchers stated that the reason for the high prevalence of this method is that the materials for hanging are highly accessible. Therefore it is considered a method which is hard to prevent (9). Akhlaghi et al. express that hanging constitutes 22.1% of suicide deaths (14). In the present study, mean age of patients was 31.4 years, half of which were under 28 years old. 83.1% were male which means the frequency of suicidal males has been 5 times more than the females. Sharija et al. have also shown that 71.3% of the suicide by hanging cases were male and 82.1% were either young or middle aged (15). A study based on the data from WHO in 56 coun- tries showed that 53% of the suicides in men and 39% in women is by hanging. In England and Wales, about half of the suicides in men aged 15-44 are carried out this Table 1: Demographic and basic factors of the patients in- cluded Factor Frequency (%) P Sex Female 10 (17.0) Male 49 (83.0) <0.001 Marital status Single 30 (50.8) Married 29 (49.2) 0.9 Place of living Rural area 23 (39.7) The city 35 (60.3) 0.12 Level of education Under diploma 37 (64.9) High school diploma 20 (35.1) 0.02 Occupation Unemployed 27 (49.1) Worker 14 (25.4) 0.04 Student 6 (10.9) 0.001 Self-employed 6 (10.9) 0.001 Retired 2 (3.6) <0.001 Table 2: Factors related to suicide in the studied patients Substance abuse status Frequency (%) Negative 50 (84.8) Positive 9 (15.2) History of psychological disorders Negative 47 (79.7) Positive 12 (20.3) History of suicide Negative 52 (88.1) Positive 7 (11.9) Season Spring 13 (22.0) Summer 13 (22.0) Fall 22 (37.3) Winter 11 (18.7) This open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0). Copyright © 2015 Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences. All rights reserved. Downloaded from: www.jemerg.com 157 Emergency (2015); 3 (4): 155-158 way (14). Also Höfer et al. showed that the ratio of sui- cide by hanging in men and women is 7 to 1 (16). The prevalence of psychological disorders in this study was 20.3%. The prevalence of psychological disorders in Iran in cities and rural areas were 20.9% and 21.3%, re- spectively (17). Therefore, there is no different between our study and the national average rate for general pop- ulation. However, the prevalence of substance abuse in Iran has been reported to be 4-7% (18-20). In this study, the prevalence of substance abuse was 15.2%, which was about twice the national average rate for general population. This result is in line with those of similar studies which express that suicide is more prevalent in People with substance use disorders (21, 22). Limitations of this study include the low number of cases, which was due to the nature of the subject of study and the low number of hanging cases that reach the hos- pital. Other limitations include not evaluating the clinical characteristics and medical interventions, history of al- cohol abuse, and type of opium abused. Conclusion: The results of this study showed that in 2 years, 59 cases committed suicide by hanging themselves, 33.9% of which finally died. Committing suicide by hanging was significantly more prevalent in men, people with an edu- Table 3: The relationship between the patients’ demographic and basic factors with their suicide outcome Factor Outcome p Death Survived Sex Male 17 (34.7) 32 (65.3) 0.99 Female 3 (30.0) 7 (70.0) Marital status Single 11 (36.7) 19 (63.3) 0.65 Married 9 (31.0) 20 (69.0) Place of living Rural area 8 (34.8) 15 (65.2) 0.97 The city 12 (34.3) 23 (65.7) Level of education Less than high school diploma 9 (45.0) 11 (55.0) 0.25 High school diploma 11 (29.7) 26 (70.3) Occupation Unemployed 10 (37.0) 17 (63.0) 0.36 Worker 5 (35.7) 9 (64.3) Student 3 (50.0) 3 (50.0) Self-employed 0 (0.0) 6 (100.0) Retired 1 (50.0) 1 (50.0) Substance abuse status Negative 19 (38.0) 31 (62.0) 0.12 Positive 1 (11.1) 8 (88.9) History of psychological disorders Negative 16 (34.0) 31 (66.0) 0.96 Positive 4 (33.3) 8 (66.7) History of suicide Negative 0 (0.0) 7 (100.0) 0.08 Positive 20 (38.5) 32 (61.5) Season Spring 5 (38.5) 8 (61.5) 0.18 Summer 7 (53.8) 6 (46.2) Fall 4 (18.2) 18 (81.8) Winter 4 (36.4) 7 (63.6) This open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0). Copyright © 2015 Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences. All rights reserved. Downloaded from: www.jemerg.com Monsef Kasmaee et al 158 cation level of less than high school diploma, and the un- employed Conflict of interest: None Funding support: None Authors’ contributions: All authors passed four criteria for authorship contribu- tion based on recommendations of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. References: 1. Pompili M, Gonda X, Serafini G, et al. Epidemiology of suicide in bipolar disorders: a systematic review of the literature. Bipolar disord. 2013;15(5):457-90. 2. Alvaro-Meca A, Kneib T, Gil-Prieto R, Gil de Miguel A. Epidemiology of suicide in Spain, 1981–2008: A spatiotemporal analysis. Public Health. 2013;127(4):380-5. 3. Kashani P, Yousefian S, Amini A, Heidari K, Younesian S, Hatamabadi HR. Effect of Intravenous Ketamine in Suicidal Ideation in Emergency Department Patients. Emergency. 2014;2(1):36-9. 4. Salman S, Idrees J, Hassan F, Idrees F, Arifullah M, Badshah S. Predictive Factors of Suicide Attempt and Non-Suicidal Self- Harm in Emergency Department. Emergency. 2014;2(4):166- 9. 5. Bertolote JM, Fleischmann A. A global perspective in the epidemiology of suicide. Suicidology. 2002;7(2):6-8. 6. World Health Organisation. World health report on violence and health. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organisation, 2002. 7. Malakouti SK, Nojomi M, Poshtmashadi M, et al. Integrating a Suicide Prevention Program into the Primary Health Care Network: A Field Trial Study in Iran. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:1-9. 8. 'Zangi M, Saadat S, Nahidi S, Svanström L, Mohammadi R. Epidemiology of injuries in metropolitan Tehran, Iran: a household survey. Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot. 2014;22:1-8. 9. Gunnell D, Bennewith O, Hawton K, Simkin S, Kapur N. The epidemiology and prevention of suicide by hanging: a systematic review. Int J Epidemiol. 2005;34(2):433-42. 10. Bridge JA, Greenhouse JB, Sheftall AH, Fabio A, Campo JV, Kelleher KJ. Changes in suicide rates by hanging and/or suffocation and firearms among young persons aged 10–24 years in the United States: 1992–2006. J Adolesc Health. 2010;46(5):503-5. 11. Farmer R, Rohde J. Effect of availability and acceptability of lethal instruments on suicide mortality an analysis of some international data. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1980;62(5):436-45. 12. Nazarzadeh M, Bidel Z, Sayehmiri K. Estimate the prevalence of physical methods used in attempted suicides in Iran: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Saf Promot Inj Prev. 2013;1(1):25-44. [Persian]. 13. Moradi S, Khademi A. Survey of suicides led to death in Iran and comparison with the global rates. Sci J Forensic Med. 2002;27:21-16. 14. Akhlaghi M, Okazi A, Ghorbani M, et al. Causes of Death Accompanying by Soft Tissue Neck Hemorrhage. Int J Med Toxicol Forensic Med. 2013;3(1):10-9. 15. Sharija S, Sreekumari K, Geetha O. Epidemiological profile of suicide by hanging in southern parts of Kerala: an autopsy based study. J Indian Acad Forensic Med. 2011;33(3):237-40. 16. Höfer P, Rockett IR, Värnik P, Etzersdorfer E, Kapusta ND. Forty years of increasing suicide mortality in Poland: Undercounting amidst a hanging epidemic? BMC Public Health. 2012;12(1):644. 17. Noorbala A, Yazdi SB, Yasamy M, Mohammad K. Mental health survey of the adult population in Iran. Br J Psychiatry. 2004;184(1):70-3. 18. Siam S. Drug abuse prevalence between male students of different universities in Rasht in 2005. Tabib-E-Shargh. 2007;2(8):279-85. [Persian]. 19. Heydari G, Yousefifard M, Hosseini M, Ramezankhani A, Masjedi M. Comparison of Cigarette Smoking, Knowledge, Attitude and Prediction of Smoking for the Next Five Years and Their Association between Students, Teachers and Clergymen. Int J Prev Med. 2013;4(5):557-64. 20. Heydari GR, Ramezankhani A, Hosseini M, Yousefifard M, Masjedi M. Evaluation of knowledge, attitude and practice about smoking among male teachers in Tehran, Iran. Payesh. 2010;9(4):355-61. [Persian]. 21. Fowler RC, Rich CL, Young D. San Diego Suicide Study: II. substance abuse in young cases. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1986;43(10):962-5. 22. Kim HM, Smith EG, Stano CM, et al. Validation of key behaviourally based mental health diagnoses in administrative data: suicide attempt, alcohol abuse, illicit drug abuse and tobacco use. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12(1):18-22. Introduction: Methods: Results: Discussion: Conclusion: Conflict of interest: Funding support: Authors’ contributions: References: