Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine. 2019; 7 (1): e19 REV I EW ART I C L E Serum and Cerebrospinal Fluid Levels of S-100β Is A Biomarker for Spinal Cord Injury; a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Gholamreza Faridaalee1, Fatemeh Keyghobadi Khajeh2 ∗ 1. Department of Emergency, Maragheh University of Medical Sciences, Maragheh, Iran. 2. Department of Community Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran. Received: November 2018; Accepted: December 2018; Published online: 12 February 2019 Abstract: Introduction: There is controversy regarding the value of serum or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) levels of S100 calcium-binding protein B (S-100β) in spinal cord injury (SCI). For reaching a general conclusion, the present meta-analysis was designed aiming to evaluate the value of serum and CSF levels of S-100β protein in detecting the presence of SCI in animal studies. Methods: An extensive search was performed in Medline, Embase, Scopus and Web of science databases. Screening articles, summarizing them and entering data to checklist and quality assessment of the mentioned articles were done by 2 independent reviewers. Data were analyzed and a pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were presented. Results: Finally, the data of 7 articles were included in the meta-analysis. Serum level of S-100B had increased as a result of SCI. Dur- ing the first 6 hours after injury, the level of this protein was very high (SMD=3.8; 95% CI: 2.6 to 5.1; p<0.0001), but as time passed the serum level of the protein had decreased (SMD=0.4; 95% CI: -1.2 to 2.0; p=0.65). In addition, CSF level of the mentioned protein was very high during the initial 6 hours after injury (SMD: 5.8; 95% CI: 3.6 to 8.0), and this elevated level was still observed until 12 hours after injury (SMD: 6.5; 95% CI: 3.7 to 9.3; p<0.0001). Conclusion: The results of the present systematic review and meta-analysis show that measuring the level of S-100β protein in serum and CSF has a potential value in diagnosis of SCI in animal models. This biomarker increases during the initial 6 hours following injury and remains high until 24 hours after that. However, more than 24 hours after the injury, serum level of this protein returns to the level of animals without SCI. Keywords: S100 Calcium Binding Protein beta Subunit; Spinal Cord Injuries; Animals; S100b protein, rat Cite this article as: Faridaalee Gh, Keyghobadi Khajeh F. Serum and Cerebrospinal Fluid Levels of S-100β Is A Biomarker for Spinal Cord Injury; a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2019; 7(1): e19. 1. Introduction T raumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) is among the most serious injuries that deeply affect the health of an in- dividual. Prevalence of SCI has been reported as 11 to 53 cases for each million population (1). Epidemiologic stud- ies performed in the past 3 decades have clearly shown that SCIs primarily affect young individuals (with the mean age of 29 years) and then impact the 30-45 years age group (2-4). In all age groups, the highest rate of spinal cord injury belongs to incomplete tetraplegia, and after that, complete paraple- ∗Corresponding Author: Fatemeh Keyghobadi Khajeh, Community Depart- ment of Faculty Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Golgasht Street, Tabriz, Iran; Email: f.keigobadi@yahoo.com; Tel/Fax: 04133829540- 09149135765 gia, complete tetraplegia, and incomplete paraplegia are the most common, respectively (5). Despite extensive research in the field of SCIs no effective treatment has been found for restoring motor and sensory functions, yet (6), but consider- able advances in looking after and providing care for SCI pa- tients has led to a significant decrease in the rate of mortality due to SCI (7). After stabilizing the clinical condition in the initial days after spinal cord injury, the family of the patients and the patients themselves want to know if they can walk again or if they will be able to carry out their personal obliga- tions such as eating, taking a bath, and wearing clothes or not (8); therefore, a correct evaluation of the severity and classifi- cation of SCI for predicting the functional status after spinal cord injury is of importance. Currently, classification of SCIs is done based on American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale (AIS) (9). Although AIS is currently a gold This open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0). Downloaded from: http://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/aaem Gh. Faridaalee et al. 2 standard in classification of SCI, this system has some limita- tions too (10). Therefore, in order to create a more compre- hensive classification, the researchers have tried to use vari- ous tools such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (11-13), electrophysiological evaluations (14-16), and biomarkers (17, 18). Biomarkers are secreted to the serum or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) at various stages and in different types of SCI. One of the biomarkers, which has received much attention in pre- diction of presence and severity of the injury is S-100β pro- tein, as studies have shown a rapid increase in its serum level after spinal cord injury (19, 20). Yet, there is still no data re- garding optimum timing of measuring this protein or the ef- fect of injury severity on its serum or CSF level. For reaching a general conclusion, the present study was designed aim- ing to evaluate the diagnostic value of serum and CSF levels of S-100β protein in detecting the presence of SCI in animal studies. 2. Methods: The present study was designed based on MOOSE guideline, which is a guide for performing systematic review and meta- analysis on observational studies (21). Defining PICO in the present study is as follows: The problem or the study population includes animals with SCI; the intended factor (index test): the level of S-100β pro- tein in serum or cerebrospinal fluid; comparisons (C): com- parison is done with a control group free of injury; and the studied outcome (O) includes the severity of injury and pres- ence or absence of SCI. 2.1. Search strategy For reaching the aims of the present study, an extensive search was performed in the electronic databases and ref- erences of related articles. Search in grey literature is an- other strategy used in the present study. Search in electronic databases was performed using the systematic method un- der the guidance of a librarian and supervision of an expert in the field of SCI. At this stage, related keywords were selected using MeSH and Emtree databases, consulting with experts in this regard, and searching in the titles and abstracts of re- lated articles. Then search strategy for each database was de- fined using the guidelines of the same database. Methods of search and summarizing data have been reported in previ- ous meta-analyses (22-34). It should be noted that electronic databases of Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched until the end of 2017. Search strategy in Med- line database is presented below as a template. 3. Selection criteria In the present research, experimental studies performed with the aim of determining the diagnostic accuracy of serum and cerebrospinal fluid levels of S-100β protein in detecting spinal cord injury were included. Only the studies that had a control group were included. Exclusion criteria consisted of absence of a control group, not reporting the protocol of measuring the biomarker and review articles. 3.1. Quality assessment and Data Extraction Screening articles, summarizing them and entering data to checklist and quality assessment of the mentioned articles were done by 2 independent individuals. Any disagreement was resolved via discussion with a third researcher. The ar- ticles were summarized using a checklist that was designed based on the guidelines of PRISMA statement (35). Extracted data included information regarding study design, character- istics of case and control groups (age, mechanism of spinal cord injury induction), the number of studied cases, and serum and CSF levels of S-100β protein. If 2 or more articles were published from the same dataset, the study which had the biggest sample size or the longest follow up was included. If the required data were not presented in the paper, the cor- responding author was contacted and asked for the required data. When the evaluated variables were presented based on various subgroups (such as sex and etc.), data were recorded separately. If the results were given as charts, the method of data extraction from charts introduced by Sistrom and Mergo was used (36). 3.2. Quality control of the study The quality was assessed using the criteria proposed by Yousefifard et al. (37) and Hassannejad et al. (38). For as- sessing the agreement between the 2 researchers, inter rater reliability was evaluated in quality assessment of the studies (agreement rate: 88%). In case of any disagreement, it was resolved by discussion with a third researcher. 3.3. Statistical analyses Analyses were done using STATA 14.0 statistical software. All studies were summarized and classified based on the stud- ied variables. In the mentioned statistical software, analyses were done using the “metan” command and forest plots of serum and CSF levels of S-100β protein in detection of spinal cord injury were drawn. In the present research, depend- ing on the presence or absence of heterogeneity, random ef- fect model or fixed effect model were used, respectively, for performing analyses. For evaluating heterogeneity between the studies, chi square and I2 tests were applied. In cases that heterogeneity was present, subgroup analyses were per- formed to determine the cause of heterogeneity. This open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0). Downloaded from: http://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/aaem 3 Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine. 2019; 7 (1): e19 Figure 1: PRISMA flow diagram of the present meta-analysis. 4. Results: 4.1. Study characteristics The search performed in databases yielded 1798 non- redundant records. After screening, finally the data of 7 ar- ticles were included in the meta-analysis (39-45) (Figure 1). These studies consisted of 136 healthy animals and 128 ani- mals with SCI. 6 studies were performed on rats (39-44) and only 1 study was performed on pigs (45). Injury severity was moderate to severe. The model of spinal cord injury used was contusion in 4 studies (39-41, 44), compression in 2 studies (42, 43), and Armor blunt trauma in one study (45). Time of sampling and evaluation of S-100β protein varied from 30 minutes to 240 hours. For performing analyses, time to sam- ple was classified into 4 groups of 0 to 6 hours after injury, 12 hours after injury, 24 hours after injury and more than 24 hours after injury. It should be noted that 4 studies had as- sessed serum levels of S-100β protein (40-43), one study had evaluated CSF level of this protein (39) and two had evalu- ated both (44, 45). Summary of the mentioned variables are reported in table 1. 4.2. Source of bias In quality control of the studies, the method suggested by Hassannejad et al. and Yousefifard et al. was applied. Find- ings of this section have been presented in figure 2. As can be seen, no study had attempted to calculate sample size, none had presented findings regarding the mortality of the animals, and quality of the studies regarding post-operative care of the animals was poor. It should be noted that con- flict of interest was reported in only one study. Out of the 19 items being evaluated in the quality assessment of the arti- cles, 11 items were desirable in almost all studies. Hetero- geneity test showed that in evaluating both the diagnostic value of serum level (I2=86.3; p<0.0001) and diagnostic value of CSF level (I2=79.5; p<0.0001) of S-100β protein, significant heterogeneity was present. Therefore, subgroup analysis was performed. 5. Meta-analysis 5.1. Serum value of S-100β protein in detection of SCI The findings showed that SCI can be detected via serum level of S-100β protein. In other words, serum level of this pro- This open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0). Downloaded from: http://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/aaem Gh. Faridaalee et al. 4 Table 1: Characteristics of included studies Author; year; coun- try Species Sample size (no-SCI / SCI) Weight Severity SCI-model Time to sample (hours) Method of S-100β analysis Location of biomarker Cao F; 2008; China (39) Sprague- Dawley rat 40 / 40 200 gr Moderate to severe Contusion 0.5 to 24 ELISA CSF Ersahin; 2011; Turkey (40) Wistar albino rat 8 / 8 250-300 gr Moderate Contusion 168 ELISA Serum Ma; 2001; Sweden (42) Sprague- Dawley rat 48 / 40 200-300 gr Moderate Compression0 to 240 ELISA Serum Loy; 2005; USA (41) Sprague- Dawley rat 12 / 12 190-230 gr Moderate to severe Contusion 6 to 24 ELISA Serum Schultke; 2010; Canada (43) Wistar rat 9 / 9 286-310 gr Moderate Compression6 to 24 ELISA Serum Yang; 2017; USA (44) Fischer rat 5 / 5 220-250 gr Moderate to severe Contusion 4 to 68 ELISA CSF and serum Zhang; 2011; China (45) White pig 14 / 14 41.5-61 kg Severe Armor Blunt Trauma 0.5 to 3 ELISA CSF and serum CSF: Cerebrospinal fluid; ELISA: Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay Table 2: Subgroup analysis of S-100β level in traumatic spinal cord injury Variable Heterogeneity P for heterogeneity Effect size P Serum level of S-100β Severity of injury Moderate 78.5% <0.0001 1.6 (0.8 to 2.4) <0.0001 Severe 91.0% <0.0001 3.4 (1.6 to 5.4) <0.0001 Significance level between groups 0.040 Injury model Contusion 73.9% <0.0001 1.8 (1.0 to 2.6) <0.0001 Compression 82.8% <0.0001 1.6 (0.3 to 2.9) <0.0001 Significance level between groups 0.122 Time to sample after injury 0 to 6 hours 86.3% <0.0001 3.8 (2.6 to 5.1) <0.0001 12 hours 40.1% 0.196 2.7 (0.5 to 4.9) 0.018 24 hours 68.8% 0.007 1.5 (0.5 to 2.5) 0.003 More than 24 hours 86.6% <0.0001 0.4 (-1.2 to 2.0) 0.652 Significance level between groups 0.003 CSF level of S-100β Severity of injury Moderate 70.1% <0.0001 4.1 (2.4 to 5.8) <0.0001 Severe 85.1% <0.0001 4.1 (2.1 to 6.2) <0.0001 Significance level between groups 0.925 Time to sample after injury 0 to 6 hours 79.6% <0.0001 5.8 (3.6 to 8.0) <0.0001 12 hours 0.0% 0.420 6.5 (3.7 to 9.3) <0.0001 24 hours 0.0% 0.777 2.7 (1.7 to 3.7) <0.0001 More than 24 hours 87.4% 0.005 0.8 (-2.2 to 3.8) 0.584 Significance level between groups 0.051 This open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0). Downloaded from: http://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/aaem 5 Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine. 2019; 7 (1): e19 Figure 2: Quality assessment of the included studies. tein increases as a result of SCI (figure 3). During the first 6 hours after injury, the level of this protein was very high (SMD=3.8; 95% CI: 2.6 to 5.1; p<0.0001), but as time passed the serum level of the protein had decreased and after more than 24 hours had passed, its measure was almost the same as the animals without a spinal cord injury (SMD=0.4; 95% CI: -1.2 to 2.0; p=0.65). It should be noted that the serum level of this protein in severe injuries (SMD=3.4; 95% CI: 1.6 to 5.4; p<0.0001) was many times more than moderate in- juries (SMD=1.6; 95% CI: 0.8 to 2.4; p<0.0001) (p=0.04) (table 2). 5.2. CSF value of S-100β protein in detection of SCI Just like the serum level, CSF level of S-100β protein had sig- nificantly increased following spinal cord injury. CSF level of the mentioned protein was very high (SMD: 5.8; 95% CI: 3.6 to 8.0), and this increased level was still observed until 12 hours after injury (SMD: 6.5; 95% CI: 3.7 to 9.3; p<0.0001). However, 24 hours after injury this rate had decreased (SMD: 2.7; 95% CI: 1.7 to 3.7; p<0.0001) and after more than 24 hours, CSF level of this protein in animals with SCI was not different from the healthy animals group (SMD: 0.7; 95% CI: -2.2 to 3.8; p=0.584) (Figure 4). 6. Discussion Most studies in the field of biomarkers related to SCI are per- formed on NSE and S-100β, but since these two biomarkers have low specificity in patients who have multiple traumas simultaneously (18) (these biomarkers also increase in trau- mas other than SCI), performing a systematic review seemed necessary for reaching a definite conclusion regarding the ef- fectiveness of these biomarkers in detection of SCI; therefore, the present systematic review evaluated the diagnostic value of serum and cerebrospinal fluid levels of S-100β protein in detection of SCI for the first time. The results of this study This open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0). Downloaded from: http://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/aaem Gh. Faridaalee et al. 6 Figure 3: Forest plot of serum S-100β in spinal cord injury. Animal studies showed that the mean level of serum S-100β is higher in an- imals with spinal cord injury during the first 24 hours after trauma. CI: Confidence interval; SMD: Standardized mean difference. Figure 4: Forest plot of CSF S-100β in spinal cord injury. Animal studies showed that the mean level of CSF S-100β is higher in ani- mals with spinal cord injury during the first 24 hours after trauma. CI: Confidence interval; SMD: Standardized mean difference. show that S-100β protein levels in serum and CSF increase in animals following SCI induction and have diagnostic value. During the initial 6 hours of SCI, the level of this protein is very high in CSF and serum, but with time passing, the serum level of this protein decreases and at times after 24 hours, its rate does not differ from animals without SCI. S-100β pro- tein, which is a calcium-binding protein, is mostly present in the cytoplasm of glial cells. Since the blood-brain barrier (BBB) is not permeable to this protein, the measure of this protein in serum and CSF is normally zero and therefore, fol- lowing injury to the central nervous system and damage of BBB, the level of this biomarker increases in CSF and serum depending on the severity of injury (46, 47). The present sys- tematic review has evaluated the level of S-100 protein in animal models of SCI. In the systematic review performed by Salehpoor et al. in 2015, the level of various biomarkers including S-100 has been evaluated in traumatic brain in- juries (TBIs) in clinical studies and it has been shown that the serum level of S-100 in children and adults strongly cor- relates with TBI diagnosis and prediction of its outcome (48). The systematic review by Thelin et al. in 2017 showed that serum level of biomarkers such as S-100 is effective in mon- itoring brain injuries in adults (49). A systematic review by Lugones et al. in 2018 presented the same results in children (50). Since spinal cord is a part of the central nervous sys- tem just like the brain and has BBB, the results of our study can also be in line with the existing studies and damage to BBB following SCI can be a logical explanation for the re- sults of our study. Various methods such as standard scor- ing system, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and electro- physiologic techniques are used for detection and classifica- tion of SCI. With the invention of diagnostic methods with high accuracy, such as enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), immunoblotting, proteomics and genomics, one di- agnostic method for SCI is evaluating the level of biomarkers in blood and CSF (51). The most famous study in the field of assessing the correlation between biomarkers and diagno- sis of SCI might be the study by Guez et al. in 2003. This re- search team proposed and evaluated the idea of assessing the level of biomarkers in CSF as a diagnostic tool for SCI (52). In that study, the level of NFL and GFAP was evaluated in CSF of patients with acute SCI and it was revealed that measur- ing these biomarkers in CSF can be used as a tool for quanti- tative classification of injured neurons following various de- grees of SCI. In 2010, for the first time, in addition to CSF, these biomarkers were measured and assessed in blood of patients with various SCI severities and with acceptable sam- ple size by Kwon et al. The results of the study expressed that measurement of IL-8, S-100β, and GFAP in CSF during the initial 24 hours following SCI is effective in determining the severity of injury and monitoring improvement process (53). Kwon et al. also extensively assessed the value of measur- ing biomarkers in CSF and serum following SCI in a review in 2011 and finally stated that considering the scarcity of stud- This open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0). Downloaded from: http://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/aaem 7 Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine. 2019; 7 (1): e19 ies to date, reaching a final conclusion regarding the value of measuring biomarkers in serum and CSF for classification of SCI severity and monitoring of the improvement process is not possible yet (17). In addition to their diagnostic value, biomarkers are also useful in choosing a strategy for selecting a treatment plan in SCI. Since the outcomes of the primary phase of SCI are unavoidable, the main goal of treatment in SCI is preventing the secondary phase during which many things happen on the molecular level and the level of neural biomarkers is extremely mutable. Therefore, these biomark- ers can be studied in the second phase for following the in- terventions performed (54, 55). 7. Limitations High level of heterogeneity was among the limitations of the present study. One of the sources of the high heterogene- ity was the time of measuring serum and CSF levels of this protein. However, other factors such as difference in tech- niques used for evaluating the level of S-100β, difference be- tween various species and etc. might be among other factors causing heterogeneity. In this study, all efforts were made to also include clinical studies that had evaluated the diagnos- tic value of S-100β in diagnosis of SCI. Yet, due to the small number of these studies, various methodologies for perform- ing the study and a high level of diversity in the studied SCI patient population, this could not be done. 8. Conclusion The results of the present systematic review and meta- analysis show that measuring the level of S-100β protein in serum and CSF has diagnostic value in diagnosis of SCI in animal models. This biomarker increases during the initial 6 hours following injury and remains high until 24 hours after it. However, more than 24 hours after the injury, serum level of this protein returns to the level of animals without SCI. 9. Appendix 9.1. Acknowledgements We are pleased to acknowledge Dr. Mahmoud Yousefifard as the third reviewer of the present work. 9.2. Authors Contributions Study concept and design: both authors Reading and selection of appropriate aticles: both authors Analysis and interpretation of data: Gholamreza Faridaalee Drafting of the manuscript: Gholamreza Faridaalee Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: both authors Authors ORCIDs Gholamreza Faridaalee: 0000-0002-9990-4936 Fatemeh Keyghobadi Khajeh: 0000-0003-0257-289X 9.3. Funding Support Maragheh University of Medical Sciences. 9.4. Conflict of Interest No conflict of interest. References 1. Wyndaele M, Wyndaele J-J. Incidence, prevalence and epidemiology of spinal cord injury: what learns a world- wide literature survey? Spinal cord. 2006;44(9):523. 2. Norton L. Spinal Cord Injury, Australia, 2007-08: Aus- tralian Institute of Health and Welfare Canberra; 2010. 3. Van Middendorp J, Hosman A, Pouw M, Van De Meent H. Is determination between complete and incomplete traumatic spinal cord injury clinically relevant? Valida- tion of the ASIA sacral sparing criteria in a prospective cohort of 432 patients. Spinal Cord. 2009;47(11):809. 4. Lopez AD, Mathers CD, Ezzati M, Jamison DT, Murray CJ. Global burden of disease and risk factors: Oxford Univer- sity Press New York; 2006. 5. van Middendorp JJ, Goss B, Urquhart S, Atresh S, Williams RP, Schuetz M. Diagnosis and prognosis of traumatic spinal cord injury. Global spine journal. 2011;1(01):001-8. 6. Tator CH. Review of treatment trials in humanspinal cord injury: issues, difficulties, and recommendations. Neu- rosurgery. 2006;59(5):957-87. 7. van Middendorp JJ, Sanchez GM, Burridge AL. The Edwin Smith papyrus: a clinical reappraisal of the oldest known document on spinal injuries. European Spine Journal. 2010;19(11):1815-23. 8. Burns AS, Ditunno JF. Establishing prognosis and max- imizing functional outcomes after spinal cord injury: a review of current and future directions in rehabilitation management. Spine. 2001;26(24S):S137-S45. 9. Kirshblum SC, Burns SP, Biering-Sorensen F, Donovan W, Graves DE, Jha A, et al. International standards for neuro- logical classification of spinal cord injury (revised 2011). The journal of spinal cord medicine. 2011;34(6):535-46. 10. Kwon BK, Streijger F, Fallah N, Noonan VK, Belanger LM, Ritchie L, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers to stratify injury severity and predict outcome in human traumatic spinal cord injury. Journal of neurotrauma. 2017;34(3):567-80. 11. Selden NR, Quint DJ, Patel N, d’Arcy HS, Papadopoulos SM. Emergency magnetic resonance imaging of cervical spinal cord injuries: clinical correlation and prognosis. Neurosurgery. 1999;44(4):785-92. This open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0). Downloaded from: http://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/aaem Gh. Faridaalee et al. 8 12. Mahmood N, Kadavigere R, Avinash K, Rao V. Magnetic resonance imaging in acute cervical spinal cord injury: a correlative study on spinal cord changes and 1 month motor recovery. Spinal Cord. 2009;47(6):504-. 13. van Middendorp J. On the injuries of the vertebrae and spinal marrow: prognostic factors & classifications: [Sl: sn]; 2010. 14. Jacobs SR, Yeaney NK, Herbison GJ, Ditunno JF. Future ambulation prognosis as predicted by somatosensory evoked potentials in motor complete and incomplete quadriplegia. Archives of physical medicine and rehabil- itation. 1995;76(7):635-41. 15. Curt A, Keck ME, Dietz V. Functional outcome following spinal cord injury: significance of motor-evoked poten- tials and ASIA scores. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 1998;79(1):81-6. 16. Curt A, Dietz V. Electrophysiological recordings in pa- tients with spinal cord injury: significance for predicting outcome. Spinal cord. 1999;37(3). 17. Kwon BK, Casha S, Hurlbert RJ, Yong VW. Inflamma- tory and structural biomarkers in acute traumatic spinal cord injury. Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine. 2011;49(3):425-33. 18. Yokobori S, Zhang Z, Moghieb A, Mondello S, Gajavelli S, Dietrich WD, et al. Acute diagnostic biomarkers for spinal cord injury: review of the literature and preliminary re- search report. World neurosurgery. 2015;83(5):867-78. 19. Wolf H, Krall C, Pajenda G, Leitgeb J, Bukaty AJ, Hajdu S, et al. Alterations of the biomarker S-100B and NSE in patients with acute vertebral spine fractures. The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine So- ciety. 2014;14(12):2918-22. 20. Mazzone GL, Nistri A. S100beta as an early biomarker of excitotoxic damage in spinal cord organotypic cultures. Journal of neurochemistry. 2014;130(4):598-604. 21. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. Jama. 2000;283(15):2008-12. 22. Hassanzadeh-Rad A, Yousefifard M, Katal S, Asady H, Fard-Esfahani A, Moghadas Jafari A, et al. The value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomogra- phy for prediction of treatment response in gastroin- testinal stromal tumors: a systematic review and meta- analysis. Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology. 2016;31(5):929-35. 23. Yousefifard M, Baikpour M, Ghelichkhani P, Asady H, Nia KS, Jafari AM, et al. Screening Performance Char- acteristic of Ultrasonography and Radiography in De- tection of Pleural Effusion; a Meta-Analysis. Emergency. 2016;4(1):1. 24. Hosseini M, Yousefifard M, Aziznejad H, Nasirinezhad F. The Effect of Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation on Allodynia and Hyperalgesia in Neuropathic Animals: A Systematic Review with Meta- Analysis. Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation. 2015;21(9):1537-44. 25. Hosseini M, Ghelichkhani P, Baikpour M, Tafakhori A, Asady H, Ghanbari MJH, et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasonography and Radiography in Detection of Pulmonary Contusion; a Systematic Review and Meta- Analysis. Emergency. 2015;3(4):127. 26. Higgins JP, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions: John Wiley & Sons; 2011. 27. Hosseini M, Yousefifard M, Baikpour M, Rahimi- Movaghar V, Nasirinezhad F, Younesian S, et al. The efficacy of Schwann cell transplantation on motor function recovery after spinal cord injuries in animal models: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of chemical neuroanatomy. 2016;78:102-11. 28. Ebrahimi A, Yousefifard M, Kazemi HM, Rasouli HR, Asady H, Jafari AM, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of chest ultrasonography versus chest radiography for identifica- tion of pneumothorax: a systematic review and meta- analysis. Tanaffos. 2014;13(4):29-40. 29. Yousefifard M, Rahimi-Movaghar V, Nasirinezhad F, Baikpour M, Safari S, Saadat S, et al. Neural stem/progenitor cell transplantation for spinal cord injury treatment; A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuroscience. 2016;322:377-97. 30. Yousefifard M, Baikpour M, Ghelichkhani P, Asady H, Darafarin A, Esfahani MRA, et al. Comparison of Ultra- sonography and Radiography in Detection of Thoracic Bone Fractures; a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Emergency. 2016;4(2):55. 31. Rahimi-Movaghar V, Yousefifard M, Ghelichkhani P, Baikpour M, Tafakhori A, Asady H, et al. Application of Ultrasonography and Radiography in Detection of Hemothorax: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. EMERGENCY-An Academic Emergency Medicine Jour- nal. 2016;4(3):116-26. 32. Rahimi-Movagha V, Yousefifard M, Ghelichkhani P, Baikpour M, Tafakhori A, Asady H, et al. Application of ul- trasonography and radiography in detection of hemoth- orax: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Emergency. 2015;4(0):9681-. 33. Izadi A, Yousefifard M, Nakhjavan-Shahraki B, Baikpour M, Mirzay Razaz J, Hosseini M. Diagnostic Value of Uri- nary Neutrophil Gelatinase-Associated Lipocalin (NGAL) in Detection of Pediatric Acute Kidney Injury; a System- atic Review and Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Pediatrics. 2016;4(11):3875-95. 34. Izadi A, Yousefifard M, Nakhjavan-Shahraki B, Baikpour This open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0). Downloaded from: http://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/aaem 9 Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine. 2019; 7 (1): e19 M, Mirzay Razaz J, Ataei N, et al. Value of plasma/serum neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin in detection of pediatric acute kidney injury; a systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Pediatrics. 2016;4(11):3815-36. 35. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred re- porting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Annals of internal medicine. 2009;151(4):264-9. 36. Sistrom CL, Mergo PJ. A simple method for obtaining original data from published graphs and plots. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2000;174(5):1241-4. 37. Yousefifard M, Rahimi-Movaghar V, Nasirinezhad F, Baikpour M, Safari S, Saadat S, et al. Neural stem/progenitor cell transplantation for spinal cord injury treatment; A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuroscience. 2016;322:377-97. 38. Hassannejad Z, Sharif-Alhoseini M, Shakouri-Motlagh A, Vahedi F, Zadegan SA, Mokhatab M, et al. Potential vari- ables affecting the quality of animal studies regarding pathophysiology of traumatic spinal cord injuries. Spinal cord. 2016;54(8):579-83. 39. Cao F, Yang XF, Liu WG, Hu WW, Li G, Zheng XJ, et al. Ele- vation of neuron-specific enolase and S-100beta protein level in experimental acute spinal cord injury. Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgi- cal Society of Australasia. 2008;15(5):541-4. 40. Ersahin M, Toklu HZ, Erzik C, Akakin D, Tetik S, Sener G, et al. Ghrelin alleviates spinal cord injury in rats via its anti-inflammatory effects. Turkish neurosurgery. 2011;21(4):599-605. 41. Loy DN, Sroufe AE, Pelt JL, Burke DA, Cao QL, Talbott JF, et al. Serum biomarkers for experimental acute spinal cord injury: rapid elevation of neuron-specific enolase and S-100beta. Neurosurgery. 2005;56(2):391-7; discus- sion -7. 42. Ma J, Novikov LN, Karlsson K, Kellerth JO, Wiberg M. Plexus avulsion and spinal cord injury increase the serum concentration of S-100 protein: an experimental study in rats. Scandinavian journal of plastic and recon- structive surgery and hand surgery. 2001;35(4):355-9. 43. Schultke E, Griebel RW, Juurlink BH. Quercetin admin- istration after spinal cord trauma changes S-100 levels. The Canadian journal of neurological sciences Le journal canadien des sciences neurologiques. 2010;37(2):223-8. 44. Yang Z, Bramlett HM, Moghieb A, Yu D, Wang P, Lin F, et al. Temporal Profile and Severity Correlation of a Panel of Rat Spinal Cord Injury Protein Biomarkers. Molecular neurobiology. 2017. 45. Zhang B, Huang Y, Su Z, Wang S, Wang S, Wang J, et al. Neurological, functional, and biomechanical character- istics after high-velocity behind armor blunt trauma of the spine. The Journal of trauma. 2011;71(6):1680-8. 46. Fassbender K, Schmidt R, Schreiner A, Fatar M, MÃijhlhauser F, Daffertshofer M, et al. Leakage of brain-originated proteins in peripheral blood: temporal profile and diagnostic value in early ischemic stroke. Journal of the neurological sciences. 1997;148(1):101-5. 47. Woertgen C, Rothoerl R, Holzschuh M, Metz C, Brawan- ski A. Comparison of serial S-100 and NSE serum mea- surements after severe head injury. Acta neurochirurgica. 1997;139(12):1161-5. 48. Salehpoor F, Meshkini A, Shokouhi G, Aghazade J, Lotfinia I, Shakeri M, et al. Prognostic serum factors in traumatic brian injury: a systematic review. Iranian jour- nal of neurosurgery. 2015;1(1):10-22. 49. Thelin EP, Zeiler FA, Ercole A, Mondello S, Buki A, Bellan- der BM, et al. Serial Sampling of Serum Protein Biomark- ers for Monitoring Human Traumatic Brain Injury Dy- namics: A Systematic Review. Frontiers in neurology. 2017;8:300. 50. Lugones M, Parkin G, Bjelosevic S, Takagi M, Clarke C, Anderson V, et al. Blood biomarkers in paediatric mild traumatic brain injury: a systematic review. Neuro- science & Biobehavioral Reviews. 2018. 51. Chen A, Springer JE. Neuroproteomic methods in spinal cord injury. Neuroproteomics: Springer; 2009. p. 57-67. 52. Guez M, Hildingsson C, Rosengren L, Karlsson K, Toola- nen G. Nervous tissue damage markers in cerebrospinal fluid after cervical spine injuries and whiplash trauma. Journal of neurotrauma. 2003;20(9):853-8. 53. Kwon BK, Stammers AM, Belanger LM, Bernardo A, Chan D, Bishop CM, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid inflam- matory cytokines and biomarkers of injury severity in acute human spinal cord injury. Journal of neurotrauma. 2010;27(4):669-82. 54. Dumont AS, Dumont RJ, Oskouian RJ. Will improved un- derstanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms in- volved in acute spinal cord injury improve the potential for therapeutic intervention? Current opinion in neurol- ogy. 2002;15(6):713-20. 55. Oyinbo CA. Secondary injury mechanisms in traumatic spinal cord injury: a nugget of this multiply cascade. Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars). 2011;71(2):281-99. This open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0). Downloaded from: http://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/aaem Introduction Methods: Selection criteria Results: Meta-analysis Discussion Limitations Conclusion Appendix References