Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine. 2019; 7 (1): e50 OR I G I N A L RE S E A RC H Risk Factors of Suicide Death Based on Psychological Au- topsy Method; a Case-Control Study Nafee Rasouli1, Seyed Kazem Malakouti1, Mohsen Rezaeian2, Seyed Mehdi Saberi3, Marzieh Nojomi4, Diego De Leo5, Abbas Ramezani-Farani6∗ 1. Mental Health Research Center, School of Behavioral Sciences and Mental Health (Tehran Institute of Psychiatry), Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. 2. Epidemiology and Biostatistics Department, Rafsanjan Medical School, Occupational Environmental Research Center, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran. 3. Legal Medicine Research Center, Legal Medicine Organization, Tehran, Iran. 4. Preventive Medicine and Public Health Research Center, Psychosocial Health Research Institute, Department of Community and Family Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. 5. Australian Institute for Suicide Research and Prevention, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. 6. Department of Clinical Psychology, School of Behavioral Sciences and Mental Health (Tehran Institute of Psychiatry), Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Received: June 2019; Accepted: July 2019; Published online: 1 September 2019 Abstract: Introduction: Investigation in each community can contribute to understanding the key factors involved in suicide death and its prevention. The present study aimed to investigate suicide death risk factors based on psy- chological autopsy method. Methods: The present case-control study was conducted from April to September 2017, in Tehran, Iran, to compare two groups of people; those who died by suicide and controls (over the age of 18 years). Data were collected by one interviewer via Structured Clinical Interviews (SCID-I), questionnaires used in the SUPREMISS study, and the Dickman impulsivity scale. Results: Each group consisted of 40 individuals. There was no significant difference between the case and control groups in terms of all demographic variables except for the level of education (p = 0.06) and occupational status (p = 0.009). The frequency of previous his- tory of suicide attempt (p = 0.001), family history of suicide (p = 0.003), DSM IV Axis I disorders (p = 0.006), and substance and alcohol consumption (p = 0.01) were significantly higher in the case group. The most commonly diagnosed disorders included MDD (45%) and substance use disorders (30%), respectively. The most common methods used in suicide included hanging (32.5%), and Aluminum phosphide poisoning (32.5%) known as rice tablet. The strongest predictor of suicide death was the deceased person’s Previous history of suicide attempt (OR= 9.3; p = 0.04), smoking (OR= 6.4; p = 0.006), unemployment (OR= 5; p = 0.02), and DSM IV axis I disorders (OR= 3.8; p = 0.04). Conclusion: Previous suicide attempt, smoking, unemployment, and suffering from at least one mental disorder were the significant predictors of suicide death. Among mental disorders, major depressive disorder and substance use disorder were the most prevalent mental health problems. Keywords: Suicide; risk factors; mental disorders; depression; psychological autopsy Cite this article as: Rasouli N, Malakouti S K, Rezaeian M, Saberi S M, Nojomi M, De Leo D, Ramezani-Farani A. Risk Factors of Suicide Death Based on Psychological Autopsy Method; a Case-Control Study . Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2019; 7(1): e50. 1. Introduction One person ends his/her life through suicide somewhere in ∗Corresponding Author: Abbas Ramezani-Farani; Department of Clinical Psychology, School of Behavioral Sciences and Mental Health, Iran Univer- sity of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Tel: 00989194543139, Email: ramezani- farani.a@iums.ac.ir, the world every 40 seconds; however, suicide is preventable. At least 6 people are directly affected by any suicide-related death (1). Since suicide is a very sensitive issue, and even ille- gal in some countries (2, 3), it is likely to be reported less than the actual rate. An increasing trend in suicide rate has been revealed in Iran through research in the last two decades (4). Suicides and attempted suicides have increased from 8.3 per 100,000 population in 2001 to 19.4 in 2005 (5, 6). The stated This open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0). Downloaded from: http://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/aaem N. Rasouli et al. 2 figure is smaller than most local reports that have been car- ried out as research studies (6); however, there is great vari- ation in the prevalence of suicide in different regions of the country. Western provinces of Iran had the highest rate of suicide, from 10 to 20 suicide cases, per 100,000 people be- tween 2006 and 2010. In 2012, the suicide rate per 100,000 people was 5.3 in both sexes, 3.6 in females, and 7.0 in males (1). Each day, more than 13 people take their own lives by suicide in Iran; most of whom are aged 15-35 years. The av- erage nationwide rate of suicide has risen from 4.25 to 4.88 (from 2006 to 2010) and from 5.4 to 5.8 (2012-2017) accord- ing to the Legal Medicine Organization (LMO) (7). Psychiatric disorders are considered very important risk fac- tors affecting suicidal behavior and earlier psychological au- topsy (PA) studies have reported a strong relationship be- tween mental disorders and suicide deaths. Previous stud- ies in developed countries showed that 60-90% of individu- als who died by suicide had been suffering from at least one mental disorder (8, 9), with mood disorders being consid- ered as the most commonly diagnosed conditions in most studies (10, 11). In addition, the prevalence of mental dis- orders varies based on gender in such a way that the preva- lence of substance use and personality disorders were signif- icantly higher in males, but mood disorders, especially major depressive disorder (MDD) were more common in females (8). Psychological autopsy is a process that involves rewriting the deceased’s biography through psychological information ex- tracted from personal records such as police records, med- ical records and interviews with family, friends, co-workers, and physicians. Today, the psychological autopsy method has broader applications including the less ambiguous sui- cide death cases. Risk factors, personality of the deceased person, and suicidal intentions and motives are investigated using different methods such as family interviews, suicide notes, etc. (12). Psychological autopsy studies using a strong methodology have not been carried out in Iran; therefore, in- vestigating risk factors of suicide death cases in Iran can help achieve a better understanding of these factors and be effec- tive in preventing future suicide attempts. 2. Methods 2.1. Study design and setting The present case-control study was conducted from April to September 2017 to compare two groups of people, those who died by suicide and the control group. The sample size con- sisted of 40 individuals for each group. Data were collected by one interviewer via Structured Clinical Interviews (SCID-I), questionnaires used in the SUPREMISS study, and the Dick- man impulsivity scale. The protocol of study was approved by the Ethics committee of Iran University of Medical Sci- ences (ethical code: IR.IUMS.FMD.REC1396.9411). 2.2. Participants The case group consisted of individuals over the age of 18 years, who died by suicide in Tehran, the capital of Iran. The controls were alive subjects homogenous with the sui- cide group in terms of age, gender, and place of residence. The study was performed initially by accessing the medical records of the deceased for six months from April to Septem- ber 2017, through coordination with the Legal Medicine Or- ganization (LMO) of Tehran. Around 800 medical records susceptible to suicide were introduced to the investigator, which were scrutinized carefully considering inclusion and exclusion criteria. Inclusion criteria included: 1) Individu- als who died by suicide at least 3 months before the study, 2) people over 18 years of age, 3) lack of ambiguity regard- ing the suicide cause of death as recorded in the medical records. The interval of 3 months was considered due to the following reasons: first, the mourning period has been par- tially passed and, second, there is lower risk of memory dis- tortion in survivors within 3 months. Using purposive and non-randomized sampling, eligible cases were contacted by telephone call (220 close relatives and families). The research objectives and manner of accessing the infor- mation were explained to each of the close relatives and fam- ilies who accepted to take part in the study, via telephone contact. If they were willing to do so, face-to-face interview was arranged at the participant’s home. Each interview lasted 2 hours, on average. The interviewees consisted of first- degree family members, including 22 parents (18 of whom were mothers), 2 sons aged above 30 years, 8 spouses and 5 sisters, and 3 brothers, who were well aware of the symp- toms and other characteristics of the deceased. The control subjects were selected purposively and non-randomly, and consisted of 30 males and 10 females who were selected from the accessible individuals who were living in Tehran trying to match cases by gender and age. Inclusion criteria were 1) Not having history of suicide attempt; 2) Being willing to cooper- ate in the project. 2.3. Data gathering Instruments SUPREMISS study protocol was used for collecting the data in this study. This protocol includes a set of input question- naire (items 1-14), demographic questionnaire (15-27), ques- tionnaire on history of previous suicide attempt (s) and sui- cide ideation in the family (28-40), anger scale (56-65), alco- hol and drug use questionnaire (66-77). Spielberger’s State-Trait Anger Scale (STAS) This scale measures the severity of anger and includes 10 items. Questionnaire on Anger was developed in 1980. This is a self-report instrument designed in the 1970s. This instru- ment has been validated in Iran in various studies including This open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0). Downloaded from: http://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/aaem 3 Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine. 2019; 7 (1): e50 those carried out by Khodayarifard et al., in which the in- ternal consistency and test-retest reliability coefficient of the above instrument were reported to be 0.60-0.93 and 0.72-0.93 (13). Dickman Impulsivity questionnaire This questionnaire was validated by Ekhtiari et al. (2008) in Iran. The internal consistency of Cronbach’s alpha was 0.69 in healthy subjects and 0.74 in substance abusers. The Cron- bach’s alpha of dysfunctional impulsivity subscale was 0.48 in healthy subjects and 0.42 in substance abusers (14). The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I (SCID- I) This provides a clinician administered semi structured scripted approach for evaluation of psychopathology and to determine current or lifetime presence of psychiatric diag- noses according to DSM-IV Criteria (15). The diagnostic agreement for most of the specific and general diagnoses ranged from moderate to good (kappa coefficient higher than 0.6). In one study, the total kappa coefficient was reported to be 0.55 and 0.52 for lifetime and current diagnoses, respec- tively (16). 2.4. Statistical Analysis Considering the minimum difference in the frequency of mental disorders in the suicide group (90%) with the control group (30%), based on the findings of Cavanagh et al.’s (9) meta-analysis, and type I error=5% and power= 90%, sam- ple size was determined as 20 cases. Chi-square and T-test were used to compare qualitative and quantitative variables between the two groups, respectively. Variables that were sig- nificantly different between the two groups were placed in the regression equation. Some variables that had very high confidence interval were excluded from the regression anal- ysis since they were significantly different between the two groups. 3. Results 3.1. Baseline characteristics of participants The suicide group consisted of 40 people (80% male; mean age = 39.4 ± 16; range =19-75); and the control group also consisted of 40 individuals who were homogeneous with the suicide group (75% male; mean age = 37.2 ± 13.7; range = 19-72). Table 1 shows the baseline characteristics of stud- ied subjects. There was no significant difference between the case and control groups in terms of all demographic vari- ables except for the level of education (p = 0.06) and occu- pational status (p = 0.009). The frequency of previous history of suicide attempt (p = 0.0010), family history of suicide (p = 0.003), DSM IV Axis I disorders (p = 0.006), and substance and alcohol consumption (p = 0.01) were significantly higher in the case group. The most commonly diagnosed disorders included MDD (45%) and substance use disorders (30%), re- spectively. The most common methods used in suicide in- cluded hanging (32.5%), and Aluminum phosphide poison- ing (32.5%) known as rice tablet. Opioids (22.5%) had the highest prevalence rate among the substances used, which included opium (10%), heroin (7.5%), methadone (5%), and tramadol (7.5%). Table 2 compares the frequency of mental disorders, anger, and impulsivity between case and control groups. 3.2. Predictive factors of suicide The results of regression analysis revealed that the strongest predictor of suicide death was the deceased person’s Previous history of suicide attempt (OR= 9.3; p = 0.04), smoking (OR= 6.4; p = 0.006), unemployment (OR= 5; p = 0.02), and axis I disorders (OR= 3.8; p = 0.04) (Table 3). 4. Discussion Based on the findings of the present study, previous sui- cide attempt, smoking, unemployment, and suffering from at least one mental disorder were the significant predictors of suicide death. Among mental disorders, major depressive disorder and substance use disorder were the most prevalent mental health problems. The present study is the first PA study of suicide in Iran with case-control methodology and using structured inter- view with the study samples. According to the demographic data, the percentage of married and divorced people was higher in the suicide group, which is in line with the results of some other research studies (17, 18). According to the results of some previous studies in Iran (19, 20), marital discord and parent-child generation gap, are the most prevalent stressors before attempting suicide. It may be concluded that, un- like some studies conducted in developed countries (21, 22), marriage is not necessarily a protective factor against suicide. In a review study, which included data from 16 provinces of Iran, marital discord and family problems were the most common causes of suicide attempts (23). Nevertheless, in developed countries, the risk of suicide in divorced men is twice that of single or widowers, but marital status was not influential in women in contrast with the finding of our study (24). The results of a study in Japan showed that unemploy- ment and divorce increase the risk of suicide by up to four times (25). However, studies in developed countries revealed that low marital integration was also associated with a higher risk of suicide (26). In Northern Ireland, the risk of suicide in single, divorced, and widowed men was greater and more significant than women (27). It seems that any change in marital status in terms of divorce, and widowhood in the first five-years of marriage can be a risk factor for suicide, which is related to the social, cultural, and family background of This open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0). Downloaded from: http://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/aaem N. Rasouli et al. 4 Table 1: Baseline characteristics of studied patients Variables Case (n=40) Control (n=40) P value Gender Male 32 (80.0) 30 (75.0) 0.2 Female 8 (20.0) 10 (25.0) Age (years) Mean ± SD 39.42 ±16.06 37.23 ±13.7 0.9 Education High school diploma and higher 18 (45) 26 (65) 0.06 Less than high school diploma 22 (55) 14 (35) Marital status Single 15 (37.5) 18 (45) Married 20 (50) 21 (52.5) 0.2 Divorced 5 (12.5) 1 (2.5) Living arrangement Lived alone 4 (10.0) 2 (5.0) With family members 35 (87.5) 34 (85.0) 0.2 With others 1 (2.5) 4 (10.0) Occupational status Unemployed 24 (60.0) 7 (17.5) 0.009 Employed 16 (40.0) 33 (82.5) SCID-I disorder No 7 (17.5) 30 (75.0) 0.006 Yes 33 (82.5) 10 (25.0) History Previous suicide attempt 17 (42.5) 1 (2.5) 0.001 Family history of suicide attempt 7 (17.5) - 0.003 History of substance and alcohol con- sumption 15 (37.5) 5 (12.5) 0.01 Tobacco use 30 (75) 10 (25) 0.001 Suicide method Hanging 13 (32.5) - Aluminum phosphide poisoning 13 (32.5) - Jumping from a height 6 (15) - Self-injury 5 (12.5) - NA Burning 1 (2.5) - Acid intake 1 (2.5) - Carbon monoxide poisoning 1 (2.5) - Drugs/substance abuse Tranquillizers 4 (10.0) - Opioid 9 (22.5) - Cannabis 2 (5.0) - Crystal 7 (17.5) - Other 1 (2.5) - Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) or frequency (%). SCID: The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis; NA: not applicable. the society (28). Regarding education, there was a signifi- cant difference between the two groups, which is consistent with previous studies (21, 29); suicide occurs more frequently among individuals with lower level of education and this is applicable in both genders and all age groups (30). Low ed- ucation can affect the chance of finding a suitable job and income, which has a significant impact on suicide attempts (31). Most suicide attempters have education level of high school diploma, but the education level is lower among those who died by suicide (32). In terms of family support, in the current study, 87.5% of indi- viduals lived with their family, 10% lived alone, and 2.5% lived with others. Although most of the individuals in the suicide group lived with their families, it seems that the family were not able to provide enough supportive environment to pre- vent suicide. Previous studies have shown that loss of fam- ily support significantly predicts suicide attempts before at- tempting suicide (33). Therefore, it can be inferred that posi- tive and supportive interpersonal relationships, and not just physically being together as a family, can play a more effec- This open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0). Downloaded from: http://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/aaem 5 Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine. 2019; 7 (1): e50 Table 2: Case-control comparisons of mental disorders, anger, and impulsivity Variables Case Control P value Major depressive disorder 18 (45.0) 2 (5.0) 0.003 Bipolar disorders 6 (15) 1 (2.5) 0.04 Anxiety disorders 7 (17.5) 7 (17.5) 1 Psychotic disorders 6 (15.0) - 0.01 Substance-related disorders 12 (30.0) - 0.001 SCID-I disorder** 33 (82.5) 10 (25.0) 0.006 Anger# 15.6 ± 8.4 9.9 ± 5.8 0.1 Impulsivity* 9.8 ± 5.5 7.6 ± 3.9 0.2 Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) or frequency (%). *: Based on Dickman impulsivity scale, #: based on Spielberger’s State-Trait Anger Scale (STAS);**The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I (SCID). Table 3: Risk factors of suicide based on logistic regression model Variables B S.E.* Wald df OR (95% CI) P value SCID-I disorder 1.3 0.6 4.2 1 3.8 (1.06 –13.9) 0.04 Unemployment 1.6 0.7 5.1 1 5 (1.2 – 20.2) 0.02 Tobacco use 1.8 0.6 7.5 1 6.4 (1.7 – 24.5) 0.006 Previous suicide attempt 2.2 1.1 3.9 1 9.3 (1.03 – 83.7) 0.04 *SE: standard error; OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval; SCID: The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis. Each of the variables predicting the suicide was reported at ≤0.05 based on the significance level tive role in preventing suicide attempts. The present study revealed that the deceased’s previous his- tory of suicide was a strong predictor of suicide (OR = 9). Also other studies referred to the history of suicide attempt as a predictor of suicide (OR = 2-24) (9, 29, 34). The present study also referred to unemployment as a strong predictor of sui- cide (OR= 5). Nevertheless, unemployment should be con- sidered with other social factors simultaneously, but unem- ployment can be considered an important factor in suicide attempts, particularly in low-income countries. Results of a study in Iran showed that the Human Development Index has negative correlation with suicide rate (7). Results of a study on suicide attempters revealed that unemployment increases the risk of dying by suicide by 2.5 times (19). Another study (35) also reported that unemployment along with other fac- tors such as disease, economic problems, and poor support- ive systems will affect suicidal behavior. Tobacco use, was significantly higher in the suicide group compared to the control group (OR = 6.4)(19). Results of an autopsy study on suicidal behaviors in smokers (36) showed that more than 70% of deceased subjects were smokers, while smokers made up 50% of the population in the control group. Previous research studies also showed a significant higher risk of suicide among heavy smokers than those who have rarely or never smoked (37), which may be due to the high in- cidence of other psychiatric disorders, and particularly major depression in smokers. Some studies have shown that smok- ing cigarette may be a type of self-healing in depressed peo- ple (38). This relationship can also be inverse. Also, some studies (39, 40) reported that smoking increases the risk of depression. In contrast to our expectation, impulsivity and aggression were not a good predictor of fatal suicidal behavior. Many studies have referred to impulsivity as a major risk factor (41, 42). Impulsive suicide attempts are usually seen in young, single, and aggressive type-B individuals. The average age of subjects participating in the present study was 39 years, which may justify such result (43, 44). Results of a study in Ilam, one of the western provinces of Iran, showed that do- mestic violence and impulsivity could increase the risk of suicide by 1.1 to 3 times (45). GarcÃŋa et al. (2005) exam- ined impulsivity in hospitalized patients and concluded that non-impulsive attempts increase the risk of death more than other attempts and are called ‘more fatal’ (46). However, if dangerous methods such as burning are used in impulsive at- tempts, the fatality rate is 80% (45)(47). In the present study, most of the subjects (around 50%) attempted suicide with prior planning, eleven had suicide notes and eight others had implicitly pointed to their suicide attempt, which could be considered as non-impulsive suicide attempt. This can be another reason for low impulsive and aggressive behavior among the subjects. Mental disorders are a strong predictor of suicide and the treatment of these disorders can be very important in preventing suicide. The strength of this research was the use of SCID to diagnose the disorders of deceased in- dividuals by interviewing the first-degree relatives who had the closest relationship with them. One uncontrolled psy- chological autopsy study carried out in Lorestan province, This open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0). Downloaded from: http://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/aaem N. Rasouli et al. 6 with high rate of suicide in Iran, showed that 85% of the in- dividuals had mental disorders at the time of death (48). Re- sults of a longitudinal study in Ilam province, south western Iran with high rate of suicide, showed that the rate of suicide caused by psychiatric diseases has increased from 17% to 26% over the past 16 years (49). Our study showed that 82.5% of the deceased people suffered from axis I disorders, while such disorder was prevalent among 25% of the individuals in the control group. The results of other studies indicate that a high percentage (70.4%-88.6%) of the suicide cases had at least one axis I disorder (8, 11, 50). The present study showed that major depression and substance use disorders were the most prevalent disorders among the deceased (with preva- lence of 45% and 30%, respectively), which is in line with some other studies (51, 52). A review study (8), which focused on high-income countries, reported that 87% of the suicide cases had at least one axis I disorder. However, this finding is not in line with some Asian countries such as Japan (65%, 72%), India (42%), Hong Kong (69%) and China (48%,63%) (10, 36, 50, 51, 53, 54); but, it is similar to Taiwan (97% -100%) (55) and Pakistan (96%) (56). The combination of multi-dimensional risk factors including suffering from mental disorder, unemployment, and smok- ing may cause a particular group of people with low edu- cation, married/divorced, with history of suicide attempt to end their own life by suicide. Regarding the contribution of multiple risk factors in suicide, a comprehensive suicide prevention program is required particularly for geographic regions with high prevalence of suicide. Conducting psy- chological autopsies in regions with high rate of suicide in Iran, will make clear understanding of risk factors for suicide in different geographical areas to tailor the national and re- gional suicide prevention program. 5. Limitation Obtaining the consent of the deceased’s families and inter- viewing them was one of the challenging issues of conduct- ing this study. Since the present study required a long, in- depth interview, there was a need for participants’ consent over their participation in the research and the provision of effective information on the deceased. 6. Conclusion Based on the findings of the present study, previous sui- cide attempt, smoking, unemployment, and suffering from at least one mental disorder were the significant predictors of suicide death. Among mental disorders, major depressive disorder and substance use disorder were the most prevalent mental health problems. 7. Appendix 7.1. Acknowledgements This study is Supported by the Legal Medicine Organization (LMO) of Tehran and financially supported by Iran University of Medical Sciences (IUMS). Also, we gratefully acknowledge the family members that participated in this study without any expectations. 7.2. Author contribution Nafee Rasouli: Design and drafting article, execution of the study Abbas Ramezani Farani: Design and execution of the study Seyed Kazem Malakouti: Design, training and drafting article Mohsen Rezaeian: Design of the study Seyed Mehdi Saberi: Execution of the study Marzieh Nojomi: Methodol- ogy and statistics Diego De Leo: Critical review of article and comment Authors ORCIDs Nafee Rasouli: 0000-0001-8148-5422 Abbas Ramezani-Farani: 0000-0001-6910-237X Seyed Kazem Malakouti: 0000-0003-4978-6449 Mohsen Rezaeian: 0000-0003-3070-0166 Seyed Mehdi Saberi: 0000- 0002- 5817-7701 Marzieh Nojomi: 0000-0003-4330-3522 Diego De Leo: 0000-0001-8255-6480 7.3. Funding/Support This study was financially supported by deputy of research, Iran University of Medical Sciences. 7.4. Conflict of interest The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest re- garding the present study. References 1. WHO. Preventing suicide: A global imperative. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2014. Available from: https://www.who.int/mental_health/suicide- prevention/world_report_2014/en/. 2. Khan MM, Asad N, Syed E. Suicide in Asia: Epidemiology, Risk Factors, and Prevention. The International Hand- book of Suicide Prevention. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2016. p. 524-40. 3. Adinkrah M. Criminal prosecution of suicide attempt survivors in Ghana. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2013;57(12):1477 97-. 4. Pritchard C, Amanullah S. An analysis of suicide and undetermined deaths in 17 predominantly Is- lamic countries contrasted with the UK. Psychol Med. 2007;37(3):421-30. This open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0). Downloaded from: http://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/aaem 7 Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine. 2019; 7 (1): e50 5. Mohammadi G, Saadati A. Epidemiology and etiology of suicide and its relationship with demographic variables among patients 22 Bahman Hospital Emergency Nisha- pur. The Quarterly Journal of Fundamentals of Mental Health. 2004;23 & 24:117-25. [Persian]. 6. Saberi-Zafaghandi MB, Hajebi A, Eskandarieh S, Ahmadzad-Asl M. Epidemiology of suicide and at- tempted suicide derived from the health system database in the Islamic Republic of Iran: 2001-2007. East Mediterr Health J. 2012;18(8):836-41. 7. Kiadaliri AA, Saadat S, Shahnavazi H, Haghparast-Bidgoli H. Overall, gender and social inequalities in suicide mor- tality in Iran, 2006-2010: a time trend province-level study. BMJ Open. 2014;4(8):e005227. 8. Arsenault-Lapierre G, Kim C, Turecki G. Psychiatric diag- noses in 3275 suicides: a meta-analysis. BMC Psychiatry. 2004;4:37. 9. Cavanagh JT, Carson AJ, Sharpe M, Lawrie SM. Psycho- logical autopsy studies of suicide: a systematic review. Psychol Med. 2003;33(3):395-405. 10. Phillips MR, Shen Q, Liu X, Pritzker S, Streiner D, Con- ner K, et al. Assessing depressive symptoms in persons who die of suicide in mainland China. J Affect Disord. 2007;98(1-2):73-82. 11. Fleischmann A, Bertolote JM, Belfer M, Beautrais A. Completed suicide and psychiatric diagnoses in young people: a critical examination of the evidence. Am J Or- thopsychiatry. 2005;75(4):676-83. 12. Bender-Horvat S, Zelic A, Filjak S, editors. Procedure of Psychological Autopsy in Suicide Cases in the Armed Forces of Republic of Croatia. Changing Mission for the 21st Century: Proceedings; 2001; Zagreb. 13. Khodayarifard M, Spielberger CD, Lavasani MG, Zard- khaneh SA. Psychometric Properties of Farsi Version of the Spielberger’s State-trait Anger Expression Inventory- 2 (FSTAXI-2). Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2013;82:325-9. 14. Ekhtiari H, Safaei H, Esmaeeli javid G, Atefvahid MK, Edalati H, Mokri A. Reliability and Validity of Persian Versions of Eysenck, Barratt, Dickman and Zuckerman Questionnaires in Assessing Risky and Impulsive Behav- iors. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychol- ogy. 2008;14(3):326-36. [Persian]. 15. APA. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disor- ders (DSM-5®). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing; 2007. 16. Sharifi V, Asadi SM, Mohammadi MR, Amini H, Ka- viani H, Semnani Y, et al. Reliability and Feasibility of The Persian Version of The Structured Diagnostic Inter- view for DSM-IV (SCID). Advances in Cognitive Science. 2004;6(1):10-22. [Persian]. 17. Vijayakumar L, Rajkumar S. Are risk factors for suicide universal? A case-control study in India. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1999;99(6):407-11. 18. Wong PW, Chan WS, Conwell Y, Conner KR, Yip PS. A psy- chological autopsy study of pathological gamblers who died by suicide. J Affect Disord. 2010;120(1-3):213-6. 19. Nojomi M, Malakouti S, Bolhari J, Poshtmashhadi M. A predictor model for suicide attempt: Evidence from a population-based study. Arch Iranian Med. 2007;10(4):452-8. 20. Hakim Shooshtari M, Malakouti SK, Panaghi L, Mohseni S, Mansouri N, Rahimi Movaghar A. Factors Associated With Suicidal Attempts in Iran: A Systematic Review. Iran J Psychiatry Behav Sci. 2016;10(1):e948. 21. Lesage AD, Boyer R, Grunberg F, Vanier C, Morissette R, Menard-Buteau C, et al. Suicide and mental disor- ders: a case-control study of young men. Am J Psychiatry. 1994;151(7):1063-8. 22. Appleby L, Cooper J, Amos T, Faragher B. Psychological autopsy study of suicides by people aged under 35. Br J Psychiatry. 1999;175:168-74. 23. Nazarzadeh M, Bidel Z, Ayubi E, Asadollahi K, Carson KV, Sayehmiri K. Determination of the social related factors of suicide in Iran: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health. 2013;13(1):4. 24. Kposowa AJ. Marital status and suicide in the National Longitudinal Mortality Study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2000;54(4):254-61. 25. Yamauchi T, Fujita T, Tachimori H, Takeshima T, Inagaki M, Sudo A. Age-adjusted relative suicide risk by marital and employment status over the past 25 years in Japan. J Public Health (Oxf ). 2013;35(1):49-56. 26. Stack S, Wasserman I. Marital Status, Alcohol Consump- tion, and Suicide: An Analysis of National Data. J Mar- riage Fam. 1993;55(4):1018-24. 27. Corcoran P, Nagar A. Suicide and marital status in Northern Ireland. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2010;45(8):795-800. 28. Roskar S, Podlesek A, Kuzmanic M, Demsar LO, Zaletel M, Marusic A. Suicide risk and its relationship to change in marital status. Crisis. 2011;32(1):24-30. 29. Chen EY, Chan WS, Wong PW, Chan SS, Chan CL, Law YW, et al. Suicide in Hong Kong: a case-control psychological autopsy study. Psychol Med. 2006;36(6):815-25. 30. Lee WY, Khang YH, Noh M, Ryu JI, Son M, Hong YP. Trends in educational differentials in suicide mor- tality between 1993-2006 in Korea. Yonsei Med J. 2009;50(4):482-92. 31. Khang YH, Kim HR. Relationship of education, occu- pation, and income with mortality in a representative longitudinal study of South Korea. Eur J Epidemiol. 2005;20(3):217-20. 32. Rostami M, Jalilian A, Rezaei-Zangeneh R, Salari A. Fac- tors associated with the choice of suicide method in Ker- This open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0). Downloaded from: http://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/aaem N. Rasouli et al. 8 manshah Province, Iran. Ann Saudi Med. 2016;36(1):7- 16. 33. Morano CD, Cisler RA, Lemerond J. Risk factors for ado- lescent suicidal behavior: loss, insufficient familial sup- port, and hopelessness. Adolescence. 1993;28(112):851- 65. 34. Giupponi G, Innamorati M, Baldessarini RJ, De Leo D, de Giovannelli F, Pycha R, et al. Factors associated with sui- cide: Case-control study in South Tyrol. Compr Psychia- try. 2018;80:150-4. 35. Gururaj G, Isaac MK, Subbakrishna DK, Ranjani R. Risk factors for completed suicides: a case-control study from Bangalore, India. Inj Control Saf Promot. 2004;11(3):183- 91. 36. Ruiz C, De la Vega D, Barranco E, Guija J, Blanco M, Giner J, et al. EPA-1209 – Consumption of cigarettes and suici- dal behavior. a psychological autopsy study. Eur Psychia- try. 2014;29:1. 37. Evins AE, Korhonen T, Kinnunen TH, Kaprio J. Prospec- tive association between tobacco smoking and death by suicide: a competing risks hazard analysis in a large twin cohort with 35-year follow-up. Psychol Med. 2017;47(12):2143-54. 38. Crone MR, Reijneveld SA. The association of behavioural and emotional problems with tobacco use in adoles- cence. Addict Behav. 2007;32(8):1692-8. 39. Boden JM, Fergusson DM, Horwood LJ. Cigarette smok- ing and depression: tests of causal linkages using a lon- gitudinal birth cohort. Br J Psychiatry. 2010;196(6):440-6. 40. Klungsoyr O, Nygard JF, Sorensen T, Sandanger I. Cigarette smoking and incidence of first depressive episode: an 11-year, population-based follow-up study. Am J Epidemiol. 2006;163(5):421-32. 41. Madsen T, Erlangsen A, Nordentoft M. Risk Estimates and Risk Factors Related to Psychiatric Inpatient Suicide-An Overview. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;14(3):253. 42. McGirr A, Renaud J, Bureau A, Seguin M, Lesage A, Turecki G. Impulsive-aggressive behaviours and com- pleted suicide across the life cycle: a predisposition for younger age of suicide. Psychol Med. 2008;38(3):407-17. 43. Zouk H, Tousignant M, Seguin M, Lesage A, Turecki G. Characterization of impulsivity in suicide completers: clinical, behavioral and psychosocial dimensions. J Af- fect Disord. 2006;92(2-3):195-204. 44. Lim M, Lee S, Park JI. Differences between Impulsive and Non-Impulsive Suicide Attempts among Individuals Treated in Emergency Rooms of South Korea. Psychiatry Investig. 2016;13(4):389-96. 45. Ahmadi A. Suicide by self-immolation: comprehensive overview, experiences and suggestions. J Burn Care Res. 2007;28(1):30-41. 46. Baca-Garcia E, Diaz-Sastre C, Garcia Resa E, Blasco H, Braquehais Conesa D, Oquendo MA, et al. Suicide at- tempts and impulsivity. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neu- rosci. 2005;255(2):152-6. 47. Laloe V, Ganesan M. Self-immolation a common suicidal behaviour in eastern Sri Lanka. Burns. 2002;28(5):475-80. 48. Nazari H, Mahmoudi G, Obeidavi Z, Garmsiri M, Pour- nia Y. Psychological autopsy of suicide completers in Lorestan Province: A cross-sectional study. The IIOAB Journal. 2016;7(8):68-73. 49. Babanejad M, Delpisheh A, Asadollahi K, Khorshidi A, Sayehmiri K. Attribution of mental disorders in suicide occurrence. Omega (Westport). 2014;69(3):311-21. 50. Vishnuvardhan G, Saddichha S. Psychiatric comorbid- ity and gender differences among suicide attempters in Bangalore, India. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2012;34(4):410-4. 51. Zhang J, Xiao S, Zhou L. Mental disorders and suicide among young rural Chinese: a case-control psychologi- cal autopsy study. Am J Psychiatry. 2010;167(7):773-81. 52. Milner A, Maheen H, Currier D, LaMontagne AD. Male suicide among construction workers in Australia: a qual- itative analysis of the major stressors precipitating death. BMC Public Health. 2017;17(1):584. 53. Wong PW, Chan WS, Chen EY, Chan SS, Law YW, Yip PS. Suicide among adults aged 30-49: a psychologi- cal autopsy study in Hong Kong. BMC Public Health. 2008;8:147. 54. Kodaka M, Matsumoto T, Takai M, Yamauchi T, Kawamoto S, Kikuchi M, et al. Exploring suicide risk factors among Japanese individuals: The largest case- control psychological autopsy study in Japan. Asian J Psychiatr. 2017;27:123-6. 55. Cheng AT. Mental illness and suicide. A case- control study in east Taiwan. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1995;52(7):594-603. 56. Khan MM, Mahmud S, Karim MS, Zaman M, Prince M. Case-control study of suicide in Karachi, Pakistan. Br J Psychiatry. 2008;193(5):402-5. This open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0). Downloaded from: http://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/aaem Introduction Methods Results Discussion Limitation Conclusion Appendix References