Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine. 2020; 8(1): e48 CO M M E N TA RY Prone Position in Management of COVID-19 Patients; a Commentary Parisa Ghelichkhani1, Maryam Esmaeili2∗ 1. Department of Intensive Care Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. 2. Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Received: April 2020; Accepted: April 2020; Published online: 11 April 2020 Abstract: SARS-CoV-2 virus causes a pneumonia that was identified through fever, dyspnea, and acute respiratory symp- toms and named COVID-19. This disease exacerbates in a number of patients and causes pulmonary edema, multi-organ failure, and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Prevalence of ARDS among COVID-19 pa- tients has been reported to be up to 17%. Among the introduced treatment methods for management of ARDS patients, prone position can be used as an adjuvant therapy for improving ventilation in these patients. Here we reviewed the literature regarding the role of prone position in management of COVID-19 patients. Keywords: COVID-19; severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; sars-cov-2; prone position; respiratory distress syndrome, adult; pandemics Cite this article as: Ghelichkhani P, Esmaeili M. Prone Position in Management of COVID-19 Patients; a Commentary. Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2020; 8(1): e48. Dear editor: In late 2019, a new virus was introduced to the world, which caused COVID-19. The virus rapidly spread all over the world and led to a high rate of mortality and became a great challenge for the healthcare staff. SARS-CoV-2 virus causes a pneumonia that was identified through fever, dys- pnea, and acute respiratory symptoms and named COVID- 19. (1). This disease exacerbates in a number of patients and causes pulmonary edema, multi-organ failure, and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Prevalence of ARDS among COVID-19 patients has been reported to be up to 17% (2). ARDS was first introduced in 1968 with clinical presentations such as acute hypoxemia, non-cardiac pulmonary edema, decrease in pulmonary compliance, and increase in work of breathing. It was especially seen in patients who had an un- derlying sepsis, pneumonia, and aspiration or severe trauma and all of these patients were in need of positive pressure ventilation (3). 10% of patients who are admitted to the in- tensive care unit (ICU) develop ARDS (3) and despite all the treatment advances made, the rate of mortality is still high among these patients and has been reported to be between ∗Corresponding Author: Maryam Esmaeili; School of Nursing and Midwifery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Nosrat St., Tohid Sq.,Tehran, Iran. Email: esmaeiliem@yahoo.com; Tel: +982166937120, Fax: +9821669042521 30% and 40% (3). Among the introduced treatment methods for management of ARDS patients, prone position can be used as an adju- vant therapy for improving ventilation in these patients. It should be prescribed along with low tidal volume (6 cc per kg body weight) and infusion of neuromuscular blockers (cisatracurium for 48 hours). These 3 treatment strategies to- gether, lead to improvement in oxygenation and survival of ARDS patients (4). The main mechanisms of prone position in improvement of ARDS patients’ condition are affecting recruitment in dor- sal lung regions, increasing end-expiratory lung volume, in- creasing chest wall elastane, decreasing alveolar shunt, and improving tidal volume (5). Patients remaining in lengthy prone position sessions leads to decrease in mortality of pa- tients (6). However, correct selection of patients and applying the proper treatment protocol for prone positioning are key to its effectiveness. For instance, in a meta-analysis, Mun- shi et al. expressed that prone position can lead to a drop in the rate of mortality among patients with severe ARDS when applied to patients for least 12 hours a day (7). Addition- ally, in another meta-analysis it was revealed that prone po- sition can only reduce mortality due to ARDS when patients are ventilated with low tidal volume, the treatment is started within the initial 48 hours of initiation of the disease, and pa- tients have severe hypoxia. In other words, prone position This open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0). Downloaded from: http://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/aaem P. Ghelichkhani & M. Esmaeili 2 can reduce mortality only when prescribed for patients with severe impaired oxygenation, in the initial hours, and for long durations (8). Recently, in a multi-centered observational study, GuÃl’rin et al. showed that only 13.7% of patients with ARDS have been placed in prone position. Even in patients with severe ARDS, the rate of using this technique was 32.9%. In the mentioned study, 2 main reasons were given for the physicians’ reluc- tance to use this treatment method: 1- Based on the judg- ment of the physicians in most cases, the hypoxia in severe ARDS patients is not severe enough to justify using prone po- sition. 2- Most ARDS patients have hemodynamic instabil- ity, which prevents the physicians from deciding to use prone position (9). In addition to the effectiveness of this treatment method, caretaking aspects and the side effects of this position on ARDS patients should also be considered. Patients that un- dergo ventilation with ventilator in prone position face risks such as accidental removal of the tracheal tube, limited ac- cess to the venous route, bending or pulling of the catheters and chest tube, pressure wound, bruising around the mouth due to presence of the tracheal tube, edema around the eyes and facial edema, Gastroesophageal reflux, hyper-salivation and skin injuries (10). In prone position, the patient should face the ventilator and in patients with tracheostomy, a roll of fabric or pillow should be placed under the shoulders to pre- vent airway obstruction, these patients should receive mus- cle and nerve relaxant medications and high-dose sedation as infusion, eye pads should be used for closing the patients’ eyes to prevent corneal ulcers. Considering the condition of these patients and presence of pressure on their stomach, the probability of reflux after gavage is very high, so they must be closely monitored regarding aspiration of gastric contents (10). The position of patients placed in prone position should be changed every 2 hours and sides should be switched. At least 3 to 5 individuals should participate to correctly put intu- bated patients in prone position, which is a serious limita- tion for keeping the patient in this position for a long time. To solve this problem a tool called Vollman has been introduced for facilitation of moving patients placed in this position to prevent pressure wounds and deformity of joints (11). Overall, it seems that studies on the effectiveness of prone position in ARDS patients clearly point out that correct pa- tient selection, timely initiation and duration of patient’s placement in this position can all affect the effectiveness of this treatment method. Available meta-analyses show that prone position can decrease mortality in ARDS patients when performed in the initial hours of disease manifestation, in patients with severe impaired oxygenation and for a long time (8). The minimum suggested duration of prone position is 12 hours a day. 1. Declarations 1.1. Authors Contributions All authors met the criteria for gaining authorship based on the recommendations of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Authors ORCIDs Parisa Ghelichkhani: 0000-0003-3763-7999 Maryam Esmaeili: 0000-0002-4798-2270 1.2. Funding Support No fund has been received. 1.3. Conflict of Interest None. References 1. Ammirati F, Colivicchi F, Santini M. Diagnosing syn- cope in clinical practice. Implementation of a sim- plified diagnostic algorithm in a multicentre prospec- tive trial–the OESIL 2 study (Osservatorio Epidemio- logico della Sincope nel Lazio). European heart journal. 2000;21(11):935-40. 2. Chen N, Zhou M, Dong X, Qu J, Gong F, Han Y, et al. Epi- demiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study. The Lancet. 2020;395(10223):507-13. 3. Matthay MA, Zemans RL, Zimmerman GA, Arabi YM, Beitler JR, Mercat A, et al. Acute respiratory distress syn- drome. Nature Reviews Disease Primers. 2019;5(1):1-22. 4. Piehl MA, Brown RS. Use of extreme position changes in acute respiratory failure. Critical care medicine. 1976;4(1):13-4. 5. Kallet RH. A Comprehensive Review of Prone Position in ARDS. Respiratory care. 2015;60(11):1660-87. 6. Guerin C, Reignier J, Richard J-C, Beuret P, Gacouin A, Boulain T, et al. Prone Positioning in Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. New England Journal of Medicine. 2013;368(23):2159-68. 7. Munshi L, Del Sorbo L, Adhikari NKJ, Hodgson CL, Wun- sch H, Meade MO, et al. Prone Position for Acute Res- piratory Distress Syndrome. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Annals of the American Thoracic Society. 2017;14(Supplement_4):S280-s8. 8. Mora-Arteaga J, Bernal-RamÃŋrez O, RodrÃŋguez S. The effects of prone position ventilation in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. A systematic review and metaanalysis. Medicina Intensiva (English Edition). 2015;39(6):359-72. This open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0). Downloaded from: http://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/aaem 3 Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine. 2020; 8(1): e48 9. Guerin C, Beuret P, Constantin JM, Bellani G, Garcia- Olivares P, Roca O, et al. A prospective international ob- servational prevalence study on prone positioning of ARDS patients: the APRONET (ARDS Prone Position Net- work) study. Intensive care medicine. 2018;44(1):22-37. 10. McCormick J, Blackwood B. Nursing the ARDS pa- tient in the prone position: the experience of quali- fied ICU nurses. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing. 2001;17(6):331-40. 11. Klein DG. Prone positioning in patients with acute respi- ratory distress syndrome: the Vollman Prone Positioner. Critical care nurse. 1999;19(4):66-71. This open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0). Downloaded from: http://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/aaem Declarations References