Cop+Ed+fisse 2006 177Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia 2020; 92, 3 ORIGINAL PAPER No conflict of interest declared. DOI: 10.4081/aiua.2020.3.177 The role of Protopine associated with Nuciferine in controlling adverse events during hyperthermic intravesical chemotherapy instillations. A nutraceutical approach to control adverse event during intravesical instillations Francesco Chiancone, Maurizio Carrino, Maurizio Fedelini, Marco Fabiano, Francesco Persico, Clemente Meccariello, Paolo Fedelini Department of Urology, A. Cardarelli Hospital, Naples, Italy. Objectives: The aim of this study was to analyse the role of two alkaloid, Protopine and Nuciferine, in the prevention and the treatment of the low and mild grade adverse events related to the use of HIVEC® (Hyperthermic IntraVEsical Chemotherapy) instillations. Materials and methods: From September 2017 to September 2019, 100 patients were prospectively randomized into two groups: Group A = Protopine and Nuciferine syrup, 10 ml, once a day, for 8 weeks; Group B = placebo (flavoured coloured water), 10 ml, once a day, for 8 weeks. The primary endpoint was the evaluation of the efficacy of the therapy with Protopine and Nuciferine in controlling of the irritative symp- toms. The secondary endpoint was the evaluation of the influ- ences of the treatment on the uroflowmetric parameters. Results: The patients of Group A showed a better International Prostatic Symptoms Score (IPSS) score, a better control of urgency symptoms (PPIUS) and tolerate well the pain (VAS score). The treatment doesn’t modify Uroflow-Qmax and seems to improve the Uroflow-Voided Volume (ml) without influenc- ing the Uroflow-Post Void Residual volume (PVR). Moreover, the treatment with Protopine and Nuciferine has been proven to be effective in the treatment of overactive blad- der (OAB) symptoms. Patients’ evaluation of the two different treatments assessed with Patient Global Impression of Improvement questionnaire (PGI-I), demonstrated improve- ments in the Group A, while the Group B showed a lower sat- isfaction. Conclusions: Protopine and Nuciferine can be interesting nutraceutical compounds useful to control irritative and pain related symptoms of intravesical chemo/immunotherapy. KEY WORDS: Complementary medicine; Bladder cancer; LUTS; Chemotherapy; Overactive bladder; Urodynamics. Submitted 6 January 2020; Accepted 13 March 2020 INTRODUCTION In recent times, Hyperthermic IntraVesical Chemotherapy (HIVEC®) instillations has been added to the existing regimens as adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatment of bladder cancer (1). Most of the side effects were low grade and 97% of patients completed the HIVEC® pro- tocol (2). In a population of 55 BCG (Bacillus Calmette- Guérin) unresponsive non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) patients, 5% of the patients did not complete at least 5 HIVEC® instillations because of facial swelling, urticaria and urinary tract pain Grade 3 according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). Despite this, 7% of patients reported CTCAE Grade 1 bladder spams, 11% CTCAE Grade 1 urinary frequency/urgency, 24% CTCAE Grade 2 urinary fre- quency/urgency, 4% CTCAE Grade 1 urinary tract pain, 9% CTCAE Grade 2 urinary tract pain and 2% CTCAE Grade 3 urinary tract pain (3). Despite the low number of adverse events, the patients treated with HIVEC® were significantly more likely to develop urinary frequency, haematuria and bladder spasm than passive mitomycin-C (4). The aim of this study was to analyse the role of two alka- loid, Protopine and Nuciferinein the prevention and the treatment of the low and mild grade adverse events relat- ed to the use of HIVEC® instillations. MATERIALS AND METHODS From September 2017 to September 2019, 100 patients with Bacillus of Calmette Guerin (BCG)-failure (including BCG-refractory tumour, BCG-relapsing tumour and BCG unresponsive tumour) NMIBC whose underwent HIVEC® Chemotherapy were prospectively enrolled in this study. The patients (pts) were randomized into two groups using block randomization in order to obtain two groups of equal sample size. In group A, we enrolled 50 patients who received Protoves M1® (Protopine and Nuciferine) syrup, 10 ml, once a day, for 8 weeks. In group B, we enrolled 50 patients who received placebo (flavoured coloured water), 10 ml, once a day, for 8 weeks. They started the therapy two weeks before the beginning of HIVEC® treatment. Inclusion criteria covered all the patients with intermediate-and high-risk NMIBC patients who were planned to receive HIVEC® treat- ment. Patients with uncontrolled underlying diseases (ASA III or IV), post void residual urine ≥ 100 ml, bleed- ing tendency, drug abuse, chronic pelvic pain, urinary tract infection, neurological disease, bladder lithiasis, renal or liver failure, tachycardia and heart failure were Summary 04Chiancone_Stesura Seveso 24/09/20 14:13 Pagina 177 Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia 2020; 92, 3 F. Chiancone, M. Carrino, M. Fedelini, M. Fabiano, F. Persico, C. Meccariello, P. Fedelini 178 excluded from the study. Male patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) were not excluded from the study if they had nor- mal values of uroflowmetry and they did not assume any medical treatment for BPH. At the baseline, data on demographic and anthropometric features (age, weight, height, BMI [body mass index]), lifestyle characteristics (smoke, alcohol), any comorbidities (hypertension, dia- betes mellitus, etc.) were collected. All patients under- went a clinical evaluation (comprised general, genital and urologic examination). Before starting the treatment, the following measurements were collected: prostate vol- ume by transrectal ultrasound, prostate specific antigen (PSA), uroflowmetry parameters (Uroflow-Qmax, Uroflow- Voided Volume, Uroflow-PVR [Post-Void Residual]), International Prostatic Symptoms Score (IPSS) question- naire, OverActive Bladder questionnaire-short form (OABq- SF) 6 and 13, patient perception of intensity of urgency scale (PPIUS), and visual analogue scale (VAS). PSA and IPSS were investigated only in male pts. In addition, the patient impression of improvement was assessed. Improvement was evaluated with the Patient Global Impression of Improvement questionnaire (PGI-I), a vali- dated tool to estimate the improvement or the deteriora- tion associated to the treatment. The primary endpoint was the evaluation of the efficacy of the therapy with Protopine and Nuciferine in controlling irritative symp- toms, including nocturia, urinary frequency, bladder pain, urgency and urge incontinence related to the chemo-hypertermia treatment. The secondary endpoint we evaluated was the influence of the treatment on the uroflowmetric parameters. Evaluation was performed after 1 week and after 6 weeks of therapy. Statistical analyses were conducted using SAS version 9.3 software (SAS Institute, Inc., NC). Mean values with standard devi- ations (± SD) were computed and reported for all items. Statistical significance was achieved if p-value was ≤ 0.05 (two-sides). RESULTS Table 1 depicts patients’ demographics and baseline characteristics. The two groups showed no difference in terms of patients’ demographics as well as tumour char- acteristics in all variables. Of all 100 patients enrolled, 2/50 (4%) of group B with- drew the study for adverse events of HIVEC treatment. In Table 2 and 3 we show a comparison of uroflowmet- ric parameters and questionnaires from baseline and one and six weeks follow up of treatment in the cases (group A) and in the controls (group B). The uroflow parameters (Uroflow-Qmax, Uroflow-Voided Volume, Uroflow-PVR) did not show statistical significant difference from baseline in the group A and one and six weeks follow-up. Otherwise IPSS total significantly increase at one week from base- line (p < 0.001), but this difference was not significant at six weeks when IPSS total was not significantly worse from baseline (p = 0.09). In group A the quality of life showed a significant worsening from baseline after one week and six weeks of treatment in all parameters and questionnaires analyzed (OAB-q SF6, OAB-q SF13, PPIUS, VAS Scale) but after six weeks of treatment a significant- Table 1. Demographics and baseline characteristics of the 50 cases and 50 controls. Variable Value (cases) Value (controls) p N° (%) Males 40 (80%) 39 (78%) p = 0.8061 Females 10 (20%) 11 (22%) p = 0.8061 Smokers 12 (24%) 11 (22%) p = 0.8122 Non-smokers 38 (76%) 39 (78%) p = 0.8122 Diabetes (Yes) 5 (10%) 7 (14%) p = 0.5383 Diabetes (No) 45 (90%) 43 (86%) p = 0.5383 C.I.S. (Yes) 11 (22%) 8 (16%) p = 0.4444 C.I.S. (No) 39 (78%) 42 (84%) p = 0.4444 Mean ± SD Age at surgery (years) 58.52 ± 5.28 57.64 ± 5.38 p = 0.4138 BMI (kg/m2) 26.754 ± 1.96 26.916 ± 1.91 p = 0.6764 T.U.R.B. (N°) 1.86 ± 1.18 2.08 ± 1.16 p = 0.3495 Tumors (last T.U.R.B.) (N°) 3.5 ± 2.44 4.08 ± 2.25 p = 0.2195 PSA (ng/ml) 2.33 ± 0.95 2.13 ± 0.95 p = 0.2951 Prostate volume (cc) 42.43 ± 13.39 41.38 ± 13.56 p = 0.6977 Uroflow-Qmax (ml/s) 17.49 ± 2.39 17.39 ± 2.21 p = 0.8285 Uroflow-Voided Volume (ml) 250.6 ± 39.8 242.2 ± 41.2 p = 0.3023 Uroflow-PVR (ml) 15.4 ± 10.6 14.9 ± 10.1 p = 0.8097 IPSS total 7.05 ± 3.88 7.79 ± 4.55 p = 0.3837 QOL score 2.22 ± 1.23 2.34 ± 1.26 p = 0.6310 OAB-q SF 6 11.48 ± 5.18 11.92 ± 5.30 p = 0,6755 OAB-q SF 13 25.12 ± 11.50 26.02 ± 11.39 p = 0.6950 PPIUS 0.94 ± 0.79 0.96 ± 0.78 p = 0.8989 VAS scale 0.08 ± 0.27 0.18 ± 0.87 p = 0.4395 CIS: In Situ Carcinoma; BMI: Body Max Index; TURB: Trans Urethral Bladder Resection; PSA: Prostate Specific Antigen; PVR: post-void residual; IPSS: International Prostatic Symptoms Score; QOL: quality of life; OAB: overactive bladder; PPIUS: patient perception of intensity of urgency scale; VAS: visual analogue scale. Table 2. Comparison of uroflowmetry parameters and questionnaires from baseline and between one and six weeks of treatment (cases). Variable Value (baseline) Value (one-week) Value (six-weeks) Uroflow-Qmax (ml/s) 17.49 ± 2.39 16.99 ± 2.55 16.62 ± 2.43 p (from baseline) p = 0.3142 p = 0.0742 Variable Value (baseline) Value (one-week) Value (six-weeks) Uroflow-Voided Volume (ml) 250.6 ± 39.8 239.7 ± 40.10 250.9 ± 39.22 p (from baseline) p = 0.1756 p = 0.9698 p (from 1 and 6 weeks) p = 0.1611 Uroflow-PVR (ml) 15.4 ± 10.6 18.18 ± 12.46 19.7 ± 12.01 p (from baseline) p = 0.2324 p = 0.0606 p (from 1 and 6 weeks) p = 0.5360 IPSS total 7.05 ± 3.88 11.18 ± 4.84 8.35 ± 3.81 p (from baseline) p < 0.001 p = 0.0941 p (from 1 and 6 weeks) p = 0.0016 OAB-q SF 6 11.48 ± 5.18 17.16 ± 4.82 14.46 ± 5.60 p (from baseline) p < 0.001 p = 0.0069 p (from 1 and 6 weeks) p = 0.0112 OAB-q SF 13 25.12 ± 11.50 36.42 ± 10.67 31.16 ± 11.57 p (from baseline) p < 0.001 p = 0.0102 p (from 1 and 6 weeks) p = 0.0201 PPIUS 0.94 ± 0.79 2.26 ± 0.88 1.66 ± 0.66 p (from baseline) p < 0.001 p < 0.001 p (from 1 and 6 weeks) p = 0.0002 PGI-I 4 ± 0 4.2 ± 0.60 2.46 ± 0.86 p (from baseline) p = 0.1161 p < 0.001 p (from 1 and 6 weeks) p < 0.001 VAS scale 0.08 ± 0.27 3.38 ± 1.35 2.34 ± 0.96 p (from baseline) p < 0.001 p < 0.001 p (from 1 and 6 weeks) p < 0.001 PVR: post-void residual; IPSS:International Prostatic Symptoms Score; OAB: overactive bladder; PPIUS: patient perception of intensity of urgency scale; PGI-I: Patient Global Impression of Improvement questionnaire; VAS: visual analogue scale. 04Chiancone_Stesura Seveso 24/09/20 14:13 Pagina 178 ly improvement of quality of life was demonstrated with respect of the values at one week. PGI-1 did not signifi- cantly show any change at one week but showed a sig- nificant decrease at six weeks follow-up with a greater satisfaction for the treatment. In the group B the uroflow parameters did not show a statistical significant differ- ence from baseline at one and six weeks follow-up except for a significant reduction of Uroflow-Voided Volume (p = 0.0118) at one week. A significant worsening of IPSS score was seen at one and six weeks of follow-up (p < 0.001). In this group the quality of life showed a sig- nificant worsening after one week and six weeks of treat- ment from baseline in all parameters and questionnaires analyzed (OAB-q SF6, OAB-q SF13, PPIUS, VAS Scale). At six weeks follow-up a significantly worsening of qual- ity of life was demonstrated from the values at one week. PGI-1 showed a significantly increase from baseline at one and six weeks of follow-up with a worse perception of the response to the therapy. VAS scale also showed a significantly increase from baseline at one and six weeks of follow-up. In both cases an increase of values was seen from the one and six weeks of follow-up without reach- ing a significant difference. Table 4 shows a comparison of uroflowmetric parameters and results of questionnaires between cases and controls at one and six weeks. No differences were seen in the Uroflow-Qmax and in the Uroflow-PVR at one (p = 0.8846) and six weeks (0.3951) while the Uroflow- Voided Volume was significantly reduced in the controls at one (p = 0.0234) and six (p = 0.0002) weeks follow- up. The IPSS questionnaire significantly get worse in the group B instead of group A at one (p = 0.0222) and six (p < 0.001) weeks of treatment. Group A showed a sig- nificantly better OAB-q SF 6 and OAB-q SF 13 at one and six weeks of follow-up, while the PPIUS and the VAS scale were significantly worse in the group B only at six weeks. PGI-1 showed a worst perception of the condi- tion post-therapy in the group B both after one and six weeks of treatment. No adverse events were reported in both groups. DISCUSSION Several clinical trials have demonstrated a benefit for chemo-hyperthermia over intravesical chemotherapy alone for treating NMIBC (5-6). Neoadjuvant HIVEC consisted of intravesical chemotherapy with Mitomycin-C (MMC) combined with bladder hyperthermia, which was achieved in our cases with the Bladder Recirculation System (BRS) system from Combat Medical. The Combat BRS device is an external device that heats fluid (MMC in this case) in a sterile disposable bag and recirculates it to the urinary bladder at a constant and controllable tem- perature and flow rate through a three-way Foley catheter. Hyperthermia increases drug uptake into the cancer cells, affects drug metabolism, and impairs cellular DNA repair mecha- nisms that normally counteract drug effect (7-9). This treatment might be a feasible option in BCG unresponsive NMIBC patients, potentially avoiding or postponing the need for radical sur- gery in a proportion of these patients (3, 10, 11). Nevertheless, this treatment can increase the rate of local adverse events than passive mitomycin-C like urinary frequency, haematuria and bladder spasm (4). Protopine has a demonstrated anti- 179Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia 2020; 92, 3 Protopine and nuciferin for hyperthermic intravesical chemotherapy Table 3. Comparison of uroflowmetry parameters and questionnaires from baseline and between one and six weeks of treatment (controls). Variable Value (baseline) Value (one-week) Value (six-weeks) Uroflow-Qmax (ml/s) 17.39 ± 2.21 17.06 ± 2.25 17.02 ± 2.15 p (from baseline) p = 0.4611 p = 0.3982 p (from 1 and 6 weeks) p = 0.9278 Uroflow-Voided Volume (ml) 242.2 ± 41.22 220.4 ± 43.66 218.8 ± 43.21 p (from baseline) p = 0.0118 p = 0.0067 p (from 1 and 6 weeks) p = 0.8543 Uroflow-PVR (ml) 14.9 ± 10.13 13.8 ± 10.08 15.9 ± 9.98 p (from baseline) p = 0.5875 p = 0.6201 p (from 1 and 6 weeks) p = 0.2977 IPSS total 7.79 ± 4.55 13.64 ± 5.71 14.62 ± 5.92 p (from baseline) p < 0.001 p < 0.001 p (from 1 and 6 weeks) p = 0.4016 OAB-q SF 6 11.92 ± 5.3 20.58 ± 6.29 24.34 ± 6.3 p (from baseline) p < 0.001 p < 0.001 p (from 1 and 6 weeks) p = 0.0036 OAB-q SF 13 26.02 ± 11.39 43.78 ± 13.02 49.44 ± 12.65 p (from baseline) p < 0.001 p < 0.001 p (from 1 and 6 weeks) p = 0.0298 PPIUS 0.96 ± 0.78 2.12 ± 0.69 2.54 ± 0.64 p (from baseline) p < 0.001 p < 0.001 p (from 1 and 6 weeks) p = 0.0021 PGI-I 4 ± 0 4.82 ± 0.96 5.22 ± 1.02 p (from baseline) p < 0.001 p = 0.0462 p (from 1 and 6 weeks) p = 0.2719 VAS scale 0.08 ± 0.27 3.68 ± 1.88 3.92 ± 1.93 p (from baseline) p < 0.001 p < 0.001 p (from 1 and 6 weeks) p = 0.5302 PVR: post-void residual; IPSS:International Prostatic Symptoms Score; OAB: overactive bladder; PPIUS: patient perception of intensity of urgency scale; PGI-I: Patient Global Impression of Improvement questionnaire; VAS: visual analogue scale. Table 4. Comparison of uroflowmetry parameters and results of questionnaires between cases and controls at one and six weeks. Variable Value (Group A Value (Group B p Value (Group A Value (Group B p 1-week) 1-week) 6-week) 6-week) Uroflow-Qmax (ml/s) 16.99 ± 2.55 17.06 ± 2.25 0.8846 16.62 ± 2.43 17.02 ± 2.15 0.3951 Uroflow-Voided Volume (ml) 239.7 ± 40.10 220.4 ± 43.66 0.0234 250.9 ± 39.22 218.8 ± 43.21 0.0002 Uroflow-PVR (ml) 18.18 ± 12.46 13.8 ± 10.08 0.0562 19.7 ± 12.01 15.9 ± 9.98 0.0611 IPSS total 11.18 ± 4.84 13.64 ± 5.71 0.0222 8.35 ± 3.81 14.62 ± 5.92 < 0.001 OAB-q SF 6 17.16 ± 4.82 20.58 ± 6.29 0.0029 14.46 ± 5.60 24.34 ± 6.3 < 0.001 OAB-q SF 13 36.42 ± 10.67 43.78 ± 13.02 0.0026 31.16 ± 11.57 49.44 ± 12.65 < 0.001 PPIUS 2.26 ± 0.88 2.12 ± 0.69 0.3782 1.66 ± 0.66 2.54 ± 0.64 < 0.001 PGI-I 4.2 ± 0.60 4.82 ± 0.96 0.0002 2.46 ± 0.86 5.22 ± 1.02 < 0.001 VAS scale 3.38 ± 1.35 3.68 ± 1.88 0.3616 2.34 ± 0.96 3.92 ± 1.93 < 0.001 PVR: post-void residual; IPSS: International Prostatic Symptoms Score; OAB: overactive bladder; PPIUS: patient perception of intensity of urgency scale; PGI: Patient Global Impression of Improvement questionnaire; VAS: visual analogue scale. 04Chiancone_Stesura Seveso 24/09/20 14:13 Pagina 179 Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia 2020; 92, 3 F. Chiancone, M. Carrino, M. Fedelini, M. Fabiano, F. Persico, C. Meccariello, P. Fedelini 180 cholinergic- antimuscarinic (11, 12) and GABAergic (12- 15) action and it is able to influence some neurological systems responsible of bladder functions. Moreover, its anti-acetylcholinesterase action give it an antiamnesic property that may hold significant therapeutic value in alleviating certain memory impairments observed in dementia (15, 16). Protopine increase the p53-mediated transcriptional activ- ity, resulting in stabilization of p53 protein. It exerts an antiproliferative activity and may have potential effect as a chemopreventive agent for human colon cancer (16, 17). Nuciferin is a partial antagonist of D2-like receptor and has a demonstrated regulatory action on the dopaminer- gic system (responsible of urination onset (17, 18) and seems to reduce states of tension and anxiety on a psy- chological level (18-20). Nuciferine significantly inhibit- ed the lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced inflammatory cytokine IL-6 and TNF-a production in RAW 264.7 cells having potential anti-inflammatory activities (20, 21). Its use significantly decrease the expression of TLR4 in a dose-dependent manner and potently ameliorates LPS- induced mastitis by inhibition of the TLR4-NF-kB sig- naling pathway (21, 22). In addiction nuciferine alleviat- ed fructose-induced inflammation by inhibiting TLR4/PI3K/NF-kB signaling and NLRP3 inflammasome activation in rat renal cortex and HK-2 cells, which may contribute to the improvement of renal injury (22, 23). This molecule is an aporphine alkaloid of lotus leaf extract which can induce relaxation in contracted tra- cheal rings. It induce relaxation in tracheal rings mainly by inhibition of extracellular Ca2+ influx through the blockade of voltage-dependent L-type Ca2+ channels and/or nonselective cation channels, showing therapeu- tic effect on respiratory diseases associated with the aber- rant contraction of airway smooth muscles and/or bron- chospasm (23, 24). In our experience the patients who underwent Protopine and Nuciferine syrup treatment, showed a better IPSS score, a better control of urgency symptoms (PPIUS) and tolerate well the pain related to the chemo-hyperthermia treatment (VAS score) compared to control group. The treatment doesn’t modify Uroflow-Qmax at 1 and 6 weeks and seems to improve the Uroflow-Voided Volume (ml) withouth influence the Uroflow-PVR. Moreover Protopine and Nuciferine syrup treatment has been proven to be effective in the treatment of OAB symptoms with a significant reduction of the symptoms assessed with Overactive Bladder Symptoms Score question- naire (OAB-q SF6, OAB-q SF13) after six weeks of treat- ment but not after one week of treatment. This underline the need to start the treatment with Protopine and Nuciferine as soon as possible in order to enhance the effect of the treatment. Patients’ evaluation of the two different treatments (Protopine and Nuciferine vs Placebo) assessed with PGI-I, demonstrated improvements in the group of cases with a greater satisfaction expressed by patients at six weeks, while the control group showed a lower satisfaction at one and six weeks. Moreover, the treatment with Protopine and Nuciferine syrup was well tolerated by all patients, none of them showing any side effect during the period study. The study is a double-blind randomized study but is lim- ited by the small number of patients and monocentric nature. CONCLUSIONS Protopine and Nuciferine syrup can be an interesting alternative to antinflammatory and antimuscarinic agents to treat irritative and pain related symptoms of intraves- ical chemo/immunotherapy. More studies should be carried out to clarify the precise role of the active ingredients of Protopine and Nuciferine syrup and their interactions. REFERENCES 1. Sousa A, Inman BA, Piñeiro I, et al. A clinical trial of neoadju- vant hyperthermic intravesical chemotherapy (HIVEC) for treating intermediate and high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Int J Hyperthermia. 2014; 30:166-70. 2. Sousa A, Piñeiro I, Rodríguez S, et al. Recirculant hyperthermic IntraVEsical chemotherapy (HIVEC) in intermediate-high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Int J Hyperthermia. 2016; 32:374-80. 3. de Jong JJ, Hendricksen K, Rosier M, et al. Hyperthermic Intravesical Chemotherapy for BCG Unresponsive Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Patients. Bladder Cancer. 2018; 4:35-401. 4. Tan WS, Palou J , Kelly J. Safety and tolerability analysis of hyperthermic intravesical mitomycin to mitomycin alone in HIVEC I and HIVEC II: An interim analysis of 307 patients Eur Urol. 2017; 16;e1150. 5.Colombo R, Da Pozzo LF, Lev A, et al. Neoadjuvant combined microwave induced local hyperthermia and topical chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for superficial bladder cancer. J Urol. 1996; 155:1227-32. 6.Lammers RJ, Witjes JA, Inman BA, et al. The role of a combined regimen with intravesical chemotherapy and hyperthermia in the management of non- muscle-invasive bladder cancer: A systematic review. Eur Urol. 2011; 60:81-93. 7. Ahmed K, Zaidi SF. Treating cancer with heat: Hyperthermia as promising strategy to enhance apoptosis. J Pak Med Assoc. 2013; 63:504-8. 8. Kampinga HH. Cell biological effects of hyperthermia alone or combined with radiation or drugs: A short introduction to newcom- ers in the field. Int J Hyperthermia. 2006; 22:191-6. 9. Hildebrandt B, Wust P, Ahlers O, et al. The cellular and molecu- lar basis of hyperthermia. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2002; 43:33-56. 10. Babjuk M, Burger M, Compérat E, et al. EAU Guidelines on non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer, 2019. 11. Gözen AS, Umari P, Scheitlin W, et al. Effectivity of intravesci- cal thermo-chemotherapy prophylaxis for patients with high recur- rence and progression risk for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2017; 89:102-105. 12. Ustunes L., Laekeman GM, Gözler B, et al. In vitro study of the anticholinergic and antihistaminic activities of Protopine and some derivatives. J Nat Prod. 1988; 51:1021-2 13. Kardos J, Blaskó G, Simonyi M. Enhancement of gamma- aminobutyric acid receptor binding by protopine-type alkaloids. Arzneimittelforschung. 1986; 36:939-40. 04Chiancone_Stesura Seveso 24/09/20 14:13 Pagina 180 181Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia 2020; 92, 3 Protopine and nuciferin for hyperthermic intravesical chemotherapy 14. Fedurco MJ, Gregorová K, Šebrlová J, et al. Modulatory Effects of Eschscholzia californica Alkaloids on Recombinant GABAA Receptors. Biochem Res Int. 2015; 2015:617620. 15,Häberlein H, Tschiersch KP, Boonen G, et al. Chelidonium majus L.: components with in vitro affinity for the GABAA receptor. Positive cooperation of alkaloids. Planta Med. 1996; 62:227-31. 16. Kim SR, Hwang SY, Jang YP, et al. Protopine from Corydalis ter- nata has anticholinesterase and antiamnesic activities. Planta Med. 1999; 65:218-21. 17. Son Y, An Y, Jung J, et al. Protopine isolated from Nandina domestica induces apoptosis and autophagy in colon cancer cells by stabilizing p53. Phytother Res. 2019; 33:1689-1696. 18. Fowler CJ, Griffiths D, de Groat WC. The neural control of mic- turition. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008; 9:453-466. 19. Kang M, Shin D, Oh JW, et al. The anti-depressant effect of Nelumbinis semen on rats under chronic mild stress induced depres- sion-like symptoms. Am J Chin Med. 2005; 33:205-13. 20. Farrel MS, McCorvy JD, Huang XP, et al. In vitro and in vivo char- acterization of the alkaloid nuciferine. PLoS One. 2016; 11:e0150602. 21. Zhang C, Deng J, Liu D, et al. Nuciferine inhibits proinflamma- tory cytokines via the PPARs in LPS-induced RAW264.7 cells. Molecules 2018;23: pii: E2723. 22. Chen X, Zheng X, Zhang M, et al. Nuciferine alleviates LPS- induced mastitis in mice via suppressing the TLR4-NF-kB signaling pathway. Inflamm Res. 2018; 67:903-911. 23. Wang MX, Zhao XJ, Chen TY, et al. Nuciferine alleviates renal injury by inhibiting inflammatory responses in fructose-fed rats. J Agric Food Chem. 2016; 64:7899-7910. 24. Yang X, Yu MF, Lei J, et al. Nuciferine Relaxes Tracheal Rings via the Blockade of VDLCC and NSCC Channels. Planta Med. 2018; 84:83-90. Correspondence Francesco Chiancone, MD (Corresponding Author) francescok86@gmail.com Maurizio Carrino, MD Maurizio Fedelini, MD Marco Fabiano, MD Francesco Persico, MD Clemente Meccariello, MD Paolo Fedelini, MD Urology Department, A. Cardarelli Hospital, Via Antonio Cardarelli 9, 80131 - Napoli (Italy) 04Chiancone_Stesura Seveso 24/09/20 14:13 Pagina 181