id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentence	flesch	summary	cache	txt
azojete-314	Kundiri, A.M; Audu, I. ; Kundiri, A.M. 	Comparison of different methods for determining saturated hydraulic conductivity	2004	7	.pdf	application/pdf	2685	147	52	Comparison of different methods for determining saturated hydraulic conductivity 20 Table 2: Saturated hydraulic conductivity measurements (mmh -1 ) using different methods at different sites Site number Depth (cm) Guelph permeameter Velocity permeameter Disk permeameter Laboratory core 1 20 2.32 10.22 6.19 1.10 40 0.82 1.42 31.10 4.82 80 1.00 1.16 5.69 2.96 2 20 0.14 0.30 5.51 0.49 40 0.01 5.90 9.36 8.43 80 25.2 19.68 5.34 9.47 3 20 2.19 1.42 19.30 0.73 40 4.61 11.56 36.70 27.65 80 0.11 17.56 16.88 14.18 4 20 0.14 0.94 36.00 0.58 40 1.07 1.53 7.04 1.32 80 0.03 9.94 11.52 9.47 5 20 1.23 2.03 6.16 2.10 40 0.15 1.12 14.83 10.00 80 0.27 4.39 11.12 2.43 The statistical significance and multiple mean comparison of the different methods using the log10 transformed saturated hydraulic conductivity methods is presented in Table 3. The Guelph permeameter method gave the lowest estimates of saturated hydraulic conductivity, possibly because of small sample size, whereas the Disk permeameter method gave maximum values for saturated saturated hydraulic conductivity with minimum variability, possibly due to large sample size.	cache/azojete-314.pdf	txt/azojete-314.txt